alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30537]



[[Page 76038]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-74.467]


Zach System Corporation a Subdivision of Zambon Company, SPA 
Including On-Site Leased Workers of Turner Industries and Go Johnson, 
La Porte, TX; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on October 1, 2010, applicable to workers of Zach System Corporation, a 
subdivision of Zach System SPA, La Porte, Texas, including on-site 
leased workers from Turner Industries and Go Johnson, La Porte, Texas. 
The Department's notice of determination was published in the Federal 
Register on October 15, 2010 (75 FR 63511).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in the manufacture of pharmaceutical catalysts and active ingredients.
    The investigation revealed that Zach System Corporation is a 
subdivision of Zambon Company, SPA, not Zach System SPA.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to correct the parent company name of the subject firm to 
read Zambon Company, SPA.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-74,467 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Zach System Corporation, a subdivision of Zambon 
Company, SPA, including on-site leased workers of Turner Industries 
and Go Johnson, La Porte, Texas, who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after August 3, 2009, through 
October 1, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total 
or partial separation from employment on the date of certification 
through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the 
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of November 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-30537 Filed 12-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# 52.227-12 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.227 [Reserved]
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 36-2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 36-2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### Mitchell *v.*Commissioners Court of Coosa County.

*Application for Writ of Certiorari or Supersedeas.*

1. *Commissioners’ court has power to vacate void order.*— A-commissioner’s court has power and authority, *ex mero motu,*to set aside a void order made by it at a former term changing a public road.

*651Appeal from the Circuit Court of Coosa.

Heard before the Hon. J. M. Carmichael.

The commissioners court of Coosa county, upon a petition by the appellant and other named citizens of said county, made and entered on the minutes of the .court an order or decree changing a public road. At a subsequent term, the court entered an order declaring the former decree void, and *ex mero motto*set aside said decree and ordered the road which was changed to be re-established. The original petitioner then filed his application, addressed to the judge of the circuit court, asking for a writ of *certiorari*to review and to have the last order of the commissioners set aside, and that the overseer of the road be restrained from complying with'the order of the court.

On the submission of the cause, the circuit court held that the decree of commissioners court at a subsequent term, setting aside the former void decree, was correct, and, therefore,- ordered that the *certiorari*issued in accordance with the petition be quashed. From this judgment of the court the present appeal is prosecuted, and its rendition is assigned as error.

Felix L. Smith, for appellant.

The void order of the court could .only be set aside on the application of the party *interested.*— Baker *v. Barclift,*76 Ala. 414 ; *Glass v. Glass,*76 Ala. 368 ; *Buchanan v. Thomason,*70 Ala. 4Q1.

E. V. Jones and J. E. Cobb, *conPra,*

cited *Glass v. Glass,*76 Ala. 370.

COLEMAN, J.

It seems to be conceded by counsel for appellant that the judgment or order of the commissioners court changing the public road was void on its face, upon the ground that the judgment did not affirmatively show the jurisdictional facts. In this aspect of the record, the only question presented for revision, and the only one argued by counsel, is whether the commissioners court, at a subsequent term, had the power and authority, *ex mero motu,*to set aside the void order or judgment. We do not think the question admits of a doubt. The fact that in the cases cited on brief of appellant’s counsel, the void orders were set aside upon the motion of some party interested, furnishes no argu*652ment in favor of the proposition that without such motion, the court had no jurisdiction to set aside its former void order. In a case like the present, where the public are directly interested, it was the duty of the court to have proceeded as it did, and vacate its former order, by which the public road was illegally changed. *Moore v. Easley,*18 Ala. 619; *Commissioners Court v. Hearn,*59 Ala. 371; *Pettus v. McClannahan,*52 Ala. 55; *Glass v. Glass,*76 Ala. 368; *Commissioners Court v. Thompson,*18 Ala. 694.

Affirmed.
#### § 760.1200 Administration.

FSA will administer a limited 2005-2007 CGP to provide assistance to catfish producers in eligible counties that suffered catfish feed and related losses between January 1, 2005, and February 28, 2007, that is after January 1, 2005, and before February 28, 2007. Under the 2005-2007 CGP, FSA will provide grants to State governments in those States that have catfish producers that are located in eligible counties and that have agreed to participate in the 2005-2007 CGP. The amount of each grant will be based on the total value of catfish feed and related losses suffered in eligible counties in the subject state. Each State must submit a work plan providing a summary of how the State will implement the 2005-2007 CGP.
#### § 61.40 Reports of licensed samplers.

Each licensed sampler, when requested, shall make reports on forms furnished for the purpose by the Division bearing upon his activity as such licensee.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2760 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2760

   To suspend the duty on imports of ethanol, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2006

Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. Kyl, and Mr. Sununu) introduced the 
        following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
        Committee on FinanceYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend the duty on imports of ethanol, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DUTY FREE TREATMENT FOR IMPORTED ETHANOL USED FOR FUEL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter I of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking heading 
9901.00.50 and any U.S. note relating to that heading.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this subsection applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 51.2126 Particles and dust. *Particles and dust* means fragments of almond kernels or other material which will pass through a round opening 8 ⁄ 64 of an inch (3.2 mm) in diameter.
#### § 60.113 [Reserved]
ex1012.htm


    Exhibit 10.12

     

    

     

    


    ELEMENT
21 GOLF COMPANY

    


    


    Element
21 Golf Co. (Element) agrees to employ John T. Grippo as its Chief Financial
Officer. Mr. Grippo will work part time as an independent contractor, while
serving as Chief Financial Officer. The term of employment will begin January 1,
2008 for one year, renewable for an additional term. The total term of this
contract is two years. During the term of this agreement Element will pay Mr.
Grippo $4,500 in cash per month and $7,500 in Element common stock per month.
The amount of stock to be issued will be based upon the average closing price of
Element common stock during the month. The Element common stock will be issued
within 30 days of the end of each month and will be registered stock. Element
will reimburse Mr. Grippo’s expenses incurred on behalf of Element. Element will
not require Mr. Grippo to relocate.

    


    Element
will be able to terminate Mr. Grippo at any time with complete repayment of any
outstanding obligations to Mr. Grippo, a cash payment of the balance due on his
contract.

    


    All stock
will be issued in whatever name Mr. Grippo and in whatever denominations Mr.
Grippo requests. All stock issuances will be adjusted for stock splits,
dividends or other changes to the common stock. All stock issued will be freely
tradable and issued without restriction. Element will extend any and all
indemnification rights and D and O insurance (if any) coverage to Mr. Grippo in
his capacity as Chief Financial Officer as allowed by law.

    


    


    /s/Benton
Wilcoxon

    
      
        

      

    

    Benton
Wilcoxon

     

    
 

    /s/
Sergei Bedziouk

    
      

    

    Sergei
Bedziouk

     

     

    /s/ Mary
Bryan

    
      

    

    Mary
Bryan

    


     

    /s/ Nataliya
Hearn

    
      
 Nataliya
Hearn
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 4 of 4
#### VIC FRANCK’S BOAT CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. YACHT SUNCHASER III, Official No. 510373, her engines, tackle, appurtenances, etc., in rem; and Jonathan T. Garrett, Individually, in personam, Defendants.

No. C80-417B.

United States District Court, W. D. Washington.

Jan. 20, 1981.

*610Douglas M. Fryer and Richard M. Slagle of Moriarty, Mikkleborg, Broz, Wells & Fryer, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff.

James P. Moynihan of Bergman, Bauer & Freise, Seattle, Wash., for defendants.

BEEKS, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action in rem and in personam seeking to foreclose a maritime lien and collect the balance due under an oral contract to repair, and remodel defendant’s yacht SUNCHASER III. Defendant denied owing any further sums under the contract and brought an in personam counter-claim for overpayments made on the contract, lost profits for breach of the contract’s due date, and damages resulting from alleged unfair trade practices.

The vessel was arrested and later released following the posting of adequate security on the plaintiff’s claim by defendant, who now, in turn, has moved to require plaintiff to post security on its counterclaim under Rule E(7) of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims.

A built-in discretion exists within Rule E(7) to allow individual case determination of the propriety of security on a counter-claim. Under old Admiralty Rule 50, the forerunner to Rule E(7), it has been held that this discretion also allows a district court to determine the amount of the bond as long as it is just and reasonable. *Spriggs*v. *Hoffstot,*240 F.2d 76, 80 (4th Cir. 1957). The purpose of Rule E(7) is to place the parties on a basis of equality as regards security. *Seaboard & Caribbean Transport Corp. v. Hafen-Dampfschiffahrt A.G. Hapag-Hadac Seebaderdienst,*329 F.2d 538 (5th Cir. 1964).

In the exercise of my discretion, I find on the facts before me that no security is necessary to equalize the positions of the parties and that good cause exists to deny defendant’s motion for security.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Particle DrillingTechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, J. Chris Boswell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ J. Chris Boswell                     |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| J. Chris Boswell                         |
| Chief Financial Officer                  |
|                                     |
| Date:   May 11, 2005 |

 

----
Exhibit 31(ii)
                               --------------


                               CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-32CB (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
            information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
            covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2007


      /s/ Steve Bailey
      ----------------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For thequarterly period ended September 30, 2008

 

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number0-14369

 

 

SHELTER PROPERTIES VIILIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

   SouthCarolina                                          57-0784852

(State or other jurisdictionof                               (I.R.S. Employer

 incorporation ororganization)                              Identification No.)

 

55Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant's telephonenumber, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to

Small Business Subcontractors.

As prescribed in 32.009-2 , insert the following clause:

Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors (Mar 2023)

(a)

(1) In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3903 and 10 U.S.C. 3801, within 15 days after receipt of

accelerated payments from the Government, the Contractor shall make accelerated payments to its

small business subcontractors under this contract, to the maximum extent practicable and prior to

when such payment is otherwise required under the applicable contract or subcontract, after receipt

of a proper invoice and all other required documentation from the small business subcontractor.

(2) The Contractor agrees to make such payments to its small business subcontractors without any

further consideration from or fees charged to the subcontractor.

(b) The acceleration of payments under this clause does not provide any new rights under the

Prompt Payment Act.

(c) Include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all subcontracts with small

business concerns, including subcontracts with small business concerns for the acquisition of

commercial products or commercial services.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.232 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LAVAROS DAVIS 

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 3:20cv5935-MCR-HTC

MARK S. INCH, et al. 

Defendants. 

__________________________/ 

 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCEED WORD LIMIT FOR 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

 Defendants Vaughn, Nousiainen, Daniels, and Newcomb (“Defendants”), 

through undersigned counsel, respectfully move for leave to exceed the word limit 

proscribed by Northern District Local Rule 7.1(F) for Defendant’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment (Doc. 90), and provide the following in support of: 

STATEMENT OF FACTS

1. Plaintiff is a pro se prisoner in the custody of the Florida Department of 

Corrections. (Doc. 1). 1

 Plaintiff’s allegations are based on a use of force 

incident conducted on Plaintiff on August 6, 2020, while he was in custody at 

the Santa Rosa Correctional Institution (SARCI). (Doc. 1). 

1

Each document filed in this case as part of the Electronic Case File will be referenced 

as “Doc.” followed by the document number. 

Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 95 Filed 08/31/22 Page 1 of 3
2. Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 93). That Motion 

exceeds the 8000 word limit proscribed by Northern District Local Rule 7.1(F) 

by a margin of 461 words for a total of 8,461words throughout the Statement of 

Material Facts and arguments presented in support of the motion. 

3. Defendants respectfully request that this Court permit Defendantsto exceed the 

word limit and accept Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as filed. 

CONCLUSION

 Wherefore, for the foregoing reasons, Defendants’ respectfully request that 

this Court grant Defendants leave to exceed the word limit and accept Defendant’s 

Motion as filed (Doc. 93). 

 Respectfully submitted,

ASHLEY MOODY

ATTORNEY GENERAL 

/s/Ravi N. Sharma 

Ravi N. Sharma 

Assistant Attorney General

Florida Bar No.: 1019119 

Office of the Attorney General 

The Capitol, Suite PL-01 

Tallahassee Florida 32399-1050 

Telephone: (850) 414-3300 

Facsimile: (850) 488-4872 

 Ravi.Sharma@myfloridalegal.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been e-filed on 

August 31, 2022, and furnished by U.S. Mail to: Lavaros Davis, DC#M63150, Santa 

Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 95 Filed 08/31/22 Page 2 of 3
3

Rosa Correctional Institution, 5850 East Milton Road, Milton, Florida 32583-7914, on 

September 1, 2022. 

 /s/ Ravi N. Sharma

Ravi N. Sharma, Esq.

Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 95 Filed 08/31/22 Page 3 of 3
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH

                       1122(d)(2)(vi) and 1122(d)(4)(xi)

                      of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA


American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and
Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc.,
collectively the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance as
of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006 through December
31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in
1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, 229.1122(d) of
the Code of Federal Regulations, which the Asserting Party has concluded are
applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs with
respect to all mortgage loan-tracking transactions covered by this report.
The transactions covered by this report include all mortgage loan-tracking
transactions for which the Asserting Party served as a Vendor on behalf of
Servicers for such asset-backed securities transactions that were registered
after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"). The scope of the Asserting Party
assertions excludes 1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, 229.1122(d) of the Code of
Federal Regulations, which relates to servicing activities that are performed
by the Asserting Party with respect to the Platform, but are not reported on
herein.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with 1122(d)(2)(vi) and
1122(d)(4)(xi) ("the Applicable Servicing Criteria") for the Reporting Period
and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material
respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with
respect to the Platform taken as a whole. The Asserting Party used the criteria
set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period ending
December 31, 2006 as set forth in this assertion.

    American Security Insurance Company
    Standard Guaranty Insurance Company
    Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.

By: /s/ John Frobose
--------------------
     John Frobose
     Senior Vice President

Date: February 23 2007
----------------------