T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and m a ynotbe * c i t e d t o orbythe c ourt s of thi s c i r c ui te xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. T he H onor abl e R ona l d B . L e i ght on, U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge f or ** the W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof

W a s hi ngt on, s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E N IN T H C IR C U IT R OB E R T O C AR L OS GA R C I A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 74569 A ge nc yN o. A 092- 104- 762 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r5, 2010 S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B e f o r e : R YME R a n d N. R . S MI T H, C i r c u i tJ u d g e s , a n dL E I GH T ON , D i stri ct ** J udge R ob ert o C ar l os G ar ci a, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f E l S al vado r, appeal s the B oard o f Im m i g rat i o n A p p eal s’ (B IA ) o rd er u p h o l d i n g th e i m m i g rat i o n j u d g e’ s (IJ) deci si on denyi ng hi s app l i ca t i on for w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al and p rot ec t i on un der 

# FI LED OC T 19 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSA c onvi c t i on of a c c e s s orya f

t e rthe f a c tunde rS e c t i on 10851( a ) doe s not 1 q u a lif ya s a n a g g r a v a te d f

e lo n y . U ni te d State s v . V

i dal , 5 0 4 F .3 d1 0 7 2 , 1 0 8 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) ( e n b a n c ) . 2 th e C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e , a n do r d e r in g h im r e m o v e dto E l S a lv a d o r . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252, a nd gr a ntthe pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w a nd v a c a te th e r e m o v a l o r d e r , w ith in s tru c tio n s to th e D e p a rtm e n t o f H o m e la n dS e c u r ity t o t erm i n at e th e rem o v al p ro ceed i n g s. G a r c iaa r g u e s th a t th e B I A e rr o n e o u s lyru le dth a t h is C a lif o rn iaV e h ic le C ode § 10851( a ) c onvi c t i on c ons t i tut e d a n a ggr a va t e d f e l ony . W e a gr e e . T he gove rnm e ntc onc e de s tha tthe B I A e rr e d. E ve n i f the gove rnm e ntha d not conceded, the B IA cl earl y e rr ed because G ar ci a’ s c on vi ct i on do es no tqu al i fyas an a ggr a va t e d f

e l onyunde rthe m odi f

i e d c a t e gor i c a l appr oa c h. T he r e c or d of c o n v ic tio n d o e s n o t p r o v id e e n o u g h f a c ts to d e te rm in e w h e th e rG a r c iap le dg u ilty a s apr i nc i pa l ora s a n a c c e s s orya f t e rthe f a c tt o the the f

tc r i m e . T he f

e l ony 1 c om pl a i ntm e r e l yr e c i t e s the l a ngua ge of the s t a tut e , w hi c h i s i ns uf f i c i e ntt o s how th a t th e c o n v ic tio n w a s o f th e g e n e r ic a llyd e f

in e dc r im e . P enul i ar v. Mukasey , 528 F .3 d 6 0 3 , 6 1 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . T h e p le ac o llo q u yd o e s n o t c o n ta in e n o u g h f a c ts to s h o w th a t th e c o n v ic tio n w a s o f th e g e n e r ic a llyd e f

in e dc r im e e ith e rb e c au s e it m er el y s ho w s thatG ar ci a pl ed gu i l ty t o an u nd ef i ned “ C ou nt1. ” T hu s, the B IA3

coul d n othave kn ow n w hether G ar ci a w as conv i ct ed as a pri nci pal i n the theft cr i m e. T he gove rnm e nta r gue s tha tthe C ourts houl d r e m a nd the c a s e ba c k t o the B I A . W e di s a gr e e . R e m and i s notappr opr i a t e f orthr e e r e a s ons : ( 1) the i s s ue of wh e th e rac r i m e c o n s t i tu t e s a n a g g r a v a t e df e l o n yi s p u r e l yl e g a l f

o rwh i c h we o we th e B I A n o d e f

e r e n c e , Ferna ndez -R uiz v . G on zales , 4 6 6 F .3 d1 1 2 1 , 1 1 2 6 n .7 ( 9 th C i r. 20 06 ) ( en banc); (2) there has bee n n o chang e i n cas e l aw because P e nul i ar w a s d e c id e d b e f

o r e th e B I A m a d e its ru lin g ; a n d( 3 ) th e g o v e rn m e n t h a da m p le opportuni tyt o s ubm i tw ha t e ve rdoc um e nt s i tc oul d f orthe r e c or d a nd the g o v ern m en t co n ce d es th at ad d it io n al ev id en ce d o es n o t ex ist t o en h an ce G ar cia’s c om pl e t e r e c or d of

c onvi c t i on upon w hi c h the B I A ba s e d i t s de c i s i on PETI TI O N G R A N TED ; O R D ER O F R EM O VA L VA C A TED W I TH I N STR U C TI O N S TO TH E D EPA R TM EN T O F H O M ELA N D SEC U R I TY TO TER M I N A TE R EM O VA L PR O C EED I N G S.