alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 56.10 Who may be licensed and authorized. ( a ) Any person who is a Federal or State employee, the employee of a local jurisdiction, or the employee of a cooperating agency possessing proper qualifications as determined by an examination for competency and who is to perform grading service under this part, may be licensed by the Secretary as a grader.
( b ) All licenses issued by the Secretary shall be countersigned by the officer in charge of the shell egg grading service of the AMS or any other designated officer.
( c ) Any person, who is employed at any official plant and possesses proper qualifications, as determined by the Administrator, may be authorized to candle and grade eggs on the basis of the “U.S. Standards for Quality of Individual Shell Eggs,” with respect to eggs purchased from producers or eggs to be packaged with official identification. In addition, such authorization may be granted to any qualified person to act as a “quality assurance inspector” in the packaging and grade labeling of products. No person to whom such authorization is granted shall have authority to issue any grading certificates, grading memoranda, or other official documents; and all eggs which are graded by any such person shall thereafter be check graded by a grader.
[71 FR 42008, July 24, 2006]
# C_2014180EN.01000301.xml

| 13.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/3

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 June 2014

appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

(2014/C 180/04)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof

1

Having regard to the nomination submitted by the French government,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015.

2

| (2) | A member’s seat is available for France on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives as a result of the resignation of Mr Jean-Marc HUART. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat is available for France on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives as a result of the resignation of Mr Jean-Marc HUART.

| (3) | The members of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2015, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The members of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2015,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Sole Article

The following person is hereby appointed as a member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2015:

GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

| FRANCE | Ms Brigitte DORIATH |
| --- | --- |

FRANCE

Ms Brigitte DORIATH

Done at Luxembourg, 12 June 2014.

For the Council

The President

Y. MANIATIS

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 228, 31.7.2012, p. 3.

2

---
- /app03/pdfs/499cv/002/42/2921t/00114001.tif
- /app03/pdfs/499cv/002/42/2921t/00114002.tif
- /app03/pdfs/499cv/002/42/2921t/00114003.tif
25.200 Scope of subpart.       (a)                    This subpart implements-                                                         (1)                         41 U.S.C. chapter 83, Buy American;                                                            (2)                          Executive Order 10582, December 17, 1954;                                                            (3) Executive Order 13881,                         July 15, 2019;                                                            (4)                         Executive Order 14005, January                            25, 2021;                            and                                                            (5) Waiver of the domestic                         content test of the Buy American statute for acquisitions of commercially                         available off-the-shelf (COTS) items in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1907, but                         see 25.201(b)(2)(ii).                                                                             (b)                    It applies to contracts for the construction, alteration, or repair of any public building or public work in the United States.                                          (c) When using funds appropriated                   or otherwise provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub.                   L. 111-5) (Recovery Act) for construction, see                       subpart  25.6.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 25.2 - Buy American-Construction Materials
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice 136026 & (18) Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, J ustices

v SC: 136026 COA: 282578 Wayne CC: 94-005006-01-FC DAVID KORAS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 30, 2008 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G ). The motion to amend the defendant’s pl eading is GRANTED.

s0828 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2008

Clerk
#### § 62.100 Administrator.

The Administrator is charged with the administration of official assessments conducted according to the regulations in this part and approved program procedures.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-2530

LT Case No. 2022-310338-MMDB

_____________________________

GRANT HUNTER LAMIE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Volusia County.

Judith D. Campbell, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Zachary Wiseman, 

Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. 

Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

September 13, 2024

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand for 

a corrected judgment striking the $50 cost of investigation because 

it was not requested by the State or orally pronounced. See

Richards v. State, 288 So. 3d 574, 576 (Fla. 2020).
2

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

MAKAR, HARRIS, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Exhibit 33.3


[LOGO]                                                  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
                                                        Document Custody
                                                        1015 10th Avenue SE
                                                        Minneapolis, MN 55414

                                                        Appendix I

          ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are
applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006, for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the
Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The
Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform, the Company provides the following assessment of
compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has complied,
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.


                                WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

                                By:    /s/ Shari L. Gillund
                                   -----------------------------------
                                       Shari L. Gillund

                                Its:   Senior Vice President

                                Dated: March 1, 2007
§ 611.10 Standards, guidelines, and plans. ( a ) NRCS conducts soil surveys under national standards and guidelines for naming, classifying, and interpreting soils and for disseminating soil survey information.
( b ) A soil survey Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is prepared prior to the start of each soil survey project, or a work plan is prepared for soil survey maintenance activities. These documents provide specific details and technical specifications to support the interpretive and data needs of the area to be surveyed. The MOU is signed by representatives of NRCS, land grant universities, and in some States representatives of other State agencies. Federal land administering agencies also sign the MOU if federal lands are included in the survey.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of KCAP Financial, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Report), I, Dayl W. Pearson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 18, 2013

          

          By:/s/ Dayl W. PearsonDayl W. PearsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
52.246-15 Certificate of Conformance.       As prescribed in 46.315, insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for supplies or services when the conditions in 46.504apply:          Certificate of Conformance (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            When authorized in writing by the cognizant Contract Administration Office (CAO), the Contractor shall ship with a Certificate of Conformance any supplies for which the contract would otherwise require inspection at source. In no case shall the Government’s right to inspect supplies under the inspection provisions of this contract be prejudiced. Shipments of such supplies will not be made under this contract until use of the Certificate of Conformance has been authorized in writing by the CAO, or inspection and acceptance have occurred.                                          (b) 						            The Contractor’s signed certificate shall be attached to or included on the top copy of the inspection or receiving report distributed to the payment office or attached to the CAO copy when contract administration (Block10 of the DDForm250) is performed by the Defense Contract Administration Services. In addition, a copy of the signed certificate shall also be attached to or entered on copies of the inspection or receiving report accompanying the shipment.                                          (c) 						            The Government has the right to reject defective supplies or services within a reasonable time after delivery by written notification to the Contractor. The Contractor shall in such event promptly replace, correct, or repair the rejected supplies or services at the Contractor’s expense.                                          (d) 						            The certificate shall read as follows:                I certify that on ______ [*insert date*], the ____ [*insert Contractor’s name*] furnished the supplies or services called for by Contract No._____ via ____ [*Carrier*] on ________ [*identify the bill of lading or shipping document*] in accordance with all applicable requirements. I further certify that the supplies or services are of the quality specified and conform in all respects with the contract requirements, including specifications, drawings, preservation, packaging, packing, marking requirements, and physical item identification (part number), and are in the quantity shown on this or on the attached acceptance document.                Date of Execution: ________________________________ Signature: _______________________________________ Title: ____________________________________________                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.246 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CARLTON X. MATTHEWS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:21-cv-57-TKW-MAF

SERGEANT G. BURKE, et al.,

Defendants.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 20). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed under the “three 

strikes statute,” 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§1915(g).

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close 

the case file.

Case 4:21-cv-00057-TKW-MAF Document 24 Filed 09/13/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE and ORDERED this 13th day of September, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:21-cv-00057-TKW-MAF Document 24 Filed 09/13/21 Page 2 of 2
§ 7.20 Prohibition on dual office. ( a ) A member of the county committee cannot, during the time they are a committee member, also serve as: ( 1 ) The secretary to the county committee;
( 2 ) A member of the State committee; or
( 3 ) A county executive director or any other county office employee.
( b ) [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6828
MARC S. CASON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. M.D.P.S.C.S.; C.M.S., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01108-CCB) Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 28, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marc S. Cason, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Marc S. Cason, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cason v. M.D.P.S.C.S. , No. 1:08-cv-01108-CCB (D. Md. May 15, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
§ 636.20 Equitable relief. ( a ) If a participant relied upon the advice or action of any authorized NRCS representative and did not know, or have reason to know, that the advice or action was improper or erroneous, NRCS may grant relief in accordance with 7 CFR part 635. Where a participant believes that detrimental reliance on the advice or action of a NRCS representative resulted in an ineligibility or program violation, the participant may request equitable relief under 7 CFR 635.3. The financial or technical liability for any action by a participant that was taken based on the advice of a NRCS certified non-USDA TSP is the responsibility of the certified TSP and will not be assumed by NRCS when NRCS authorizes payment.
( b ) If during the term of a WHIP cost-share agreement a participant has been found in violation of a provision of the cost-share agreement, the O&M agreement, or any document incorporated by reference through failure to fully comply with that provision, the participant may be eligible for equitable relief under 7 CFR 635.4.
162 So.2d 573

#### STANDARD CASUALTY COMPANY et al. v. The FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK et al.

No. 47196.

April 17, 1964.

In re: Standard Casualty Company et aL applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 162 So.2d 26.

Writ denied. No error of law under the facts found by the Court of Appeal.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          14,872
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,954
<INVENTORY>                                      8,873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,168
<PP&E>                                         342,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                 124,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 457,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          411,458
<BONDS>                                         39,692
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       216,045
<OTHER-SE>                                    (228,515)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   457,430
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               186,123
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                91,910
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,584
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,225
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,667)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,667)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.30)







</TABLE>
52.252-3 Alterations in Solicitation.

As prescribed in 52.107(c), insert the following provision in solicitations in order to revise or

supplement, as necessary, other parts of the solicitation that apply to the solicitation phase only,

except for any provision authorized for use with a deviation. Include clear identification of what is

being- altered.

Alterations in Solicitation (Apr 1984)

Portions of this solicitation are altered as follows:

_____________________________________________ _____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.252 [Reserved]
52.222-25 Affirmative Action Compliance.

As prescribed in 22.810(d), insert the following provision:

Affirmative Action Compliance (Apr 1984)

The offeror represents that-

(a) It □ has developed and has on file, □ has not developed and does not have on file, at each

establishment, affirmative action programs required by the rules and regulations of the Secretary of

Labor (41 CFR 60-1 and 60-2); or

(b) It □ has not previously had contracts subject to the written affirmative action programs

requirement of the rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]