alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ERIC NORDQUIST,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5800-TKW-HTC

WILLIAM EDDINS,

LAWRENCE KEEFE,

and JOHN MILLER,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 4). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that Plaintiff’s complaint is due to be dismissed 

with prejudice because it is largely incomprehensible and fails to state a plausible 

claim for relief against any of the named Defendants. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by 

reference in this Order.

Case 3:20-cv-05800-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 10/09/20 Page 1 of 2
2

2. Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice, and

the Clerk shall close the file.

DONE and ORDERED this 9th day of October, 2020. 

T. Kent Wetherell, II

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05800-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 10/09/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 58.43 Fees for inspection, grading, sampling, and certification. ( a ) Unless otherwise provided in this part, the fees to be charged and collected for any service performed, in accordance with this part, on a fee basis shall be based on the applicable formulas specified in this section. For each calendar year, AMS will calculate the rate for grading, certification, or inspection services, per hour per program employee using the following formulas: ( 1 ) *Regular rate.* The total AMS grading, certification, or inspection program personnel direct pay divided by direct hours, which is then multiplied by the next year's percentage of cost of living increase, plus the benefits rate, plus the operating rate, plus the allowance for bad debt rate. If applicable, travel expenses may also be added to the cost of providing the service.
( 2 ) *Overtime rate.* The total AMS grading, certification, or inspection program personnel direct pay divided by direct hours, which is then multiplied by the next year's percentage of cost of living increase and then multiplied by 1.5 plus the benefits rate, plus the operating rate, plus an allowance for bad debt. If applicable, travel expenses may also be added to the cost of providing the service.
( 3 ) *Holiday rate.* The total AMS grading, certification, or inspection program personnel direct pay divided by direct hours, which is then multiplied by the next year's percentage of cost of living increase and then multiplied by 2, plus benefits rate, plus the operating rate, plus an allowance for bad debt. If applicable, travel expenses may also be added to the cost of providing the service.
( b ) For each calendar year, based on previous fiscal year/historical actual costs, AMS will calculate the benefits, operating, and allowance for bad debt components of the regular, overtime and holiday rates as follows: ( 1 ) *Benefits rate.* The total AMS grading, certification, or inspection program direct benefits costs divided by the total hours (regular, overtime, and holiday) worked, which is then multiplied by the next calendar year's percentage cost of living increase. Some examples of direct benefits are health insurance, retirement, life insurance, and Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) retirement basic and matching contributions.
( 2 ) *Operating rate.* The total AMS grading, certification, or inspection program operating costs divided by total hours (regular, overtime, and holiday) worked, which is then multiplied by the percentage of inflation.
( 3 ) *Allowance for bad debt rate.* Total AMS grading, certification, or inspection program allowance for bad debt divided by total hours (regular, overtime, and holiday) worked.
( c ) The calendar year cost of living expenses and percentage of inflation factors used in the formulas in this section are based on the most recent Office of Management and Budget's Presidential Economic Assumptions.
[79 FR 67323, Nov. 13, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         887,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,166
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      10,521,887
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,362,823)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,208,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,954,550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,208,922
<SALES>                                      1,144,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,162,359
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               929,744
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             274,151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (41,536)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,536)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                         5

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Nov-30-1999

<PERIOD-END>                      Aug-31-1999
<CASH>                            836,180
<SECURITIES>                      000
<RECEIVABLES>                     31,328
<ALLOWANCES>                      (31,328)
<INVENTORY>                       000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  924,867
<PP&E>                            000
<DEPRECIATION>                    000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    924,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             120,635
<BONDS>                           000
<COMMON>                          000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             000
<PREFERRED>                       000
<OTHER-SE>                        480,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      924,867
<SALES>                           241,652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  462,058
<CGS>                             000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  687,155
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (225,097)
<INCOME-TAX>                      000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (225,097)
<DISCONTINUED>                    000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,672,651
<CHANGES>                         000
<NET-INCOME>                      2,447,554
<EPS-BASIC>                     41.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                     41.32


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 16, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 16, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21A1404. YEN CHUN JAN et al. v. WOOIYI YIN.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion the hereby GRANTED, and 

jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
# C_2014044EN.01000201.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 28 January 2014

appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

(2014/C 44/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),

1

Having regard to the nomination submitted to the Council by the Commission in the category of employees' representatives,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015.

2

| (2) | A member's seat is available for Spain on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of employees' representatives, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat is available for Spain on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of employees' representatives,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following person is hereby appointed as a member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2015:

| REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES' ORGANISATIONS: |
| --- |
| SPAIN | Ms Gema TORRES |

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES' ORGANISATIONS:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES' ORGANISATIONS:

SPAIN

Ms Gema TORRES

Done at Brussels, 28 January 2014.

For the Council

The President

G. STOURNARAS

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 228, 31.7.2012, p. 3.

2

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:96-cr-00020-MP-AK

MICHAEL PHILLIP TELEMAQUE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 536, a copy of a motion captioned for a circuit

court in Arkansas, filed by Michael Phillip Telemaque. The motion is incomprehensible and

does not appear to ask for any relief in this Court. To the extent that it was intended to ask for

relief, that relief is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of March, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
# L_2014010EN.01001701.xml

| 15.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 10/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 10/17

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 13 January 2014

appointing a Swedish member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2014/10/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Swedish Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1).

| (2) | A member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Ellen NYGREN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Ellen NYGREN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Lise-Lotte LENBERG is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 13 January 2014.

For the Council

The President

D. KOURKOULAS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MEMORANDUM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

-vsJESUS RIVERA

Case No. 3:21mj003

DATE: 1/20/2021

 Your Case No. 1:21mj118

TO United States District Court

 District of Columbia

 333 Constitution Avenue NW Room 1225

 Washington, DC 20001

 

FROM: Sylvia Williams, United States District Court

 Courtroom Deputy for

Roger Vinson, Senior United States District Judge

Elizabeth M. Timothy, Chief United States Magistrate Judge

United States Courthouse

One North Palafox Street

Pensacola, Florida 32502

SUBJECT: Rule 5 Proceedings

The above-styled case originated in your division. Enclosed please find copies of

documents regarding proceedings held in the Northern District of Florida in Pensacola, Florida

wherein the following action was taken:

INITIAL APPEARANCE: 1/20/2021

DETENTION: Initial Appearance; Commitment to another District

Enclosures

Case 3:21-mj-00003-EMT Document 10 Filed 01/20/21 Page 1 of 1
52.247-18 Multiple Shipments.       As prescribed in 47.207-6(c)(5)(i), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for transportation or for transportation-related services when multiple shipments are tendered at one time to the contractor for transportation from one origin to two or more consignees at the same destination:          Multiple Shipments (Apr 1984)          When multiple shipments are tendered at one time to the Contractor for movement from one origin to multiple consignees at the same destination, the rate charged for each shipment shall be the rate applicable to the aggregate weight.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
(January 31, 1967)

#### In the Matter of the Application of Catherine E. Dougherty, as Clerk of the City Court of the City of Glens Falls, Petitioner.

Application for an order pursuant to section 89 of the Judiciary Law directing the destruction of specified records granted. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
§ 621.23 Conditions for approval. ( a ) USDA floodplain management studies are authorized by the Director of the Basin and Area Planning Division. Priority for starting floodplain management studies is based on the same factors as for USDA Cooperative Studies as described in § 621.13.
( b ) A study for an individual community may be started upon completion of a plan of work in which the Director of the Basin and Area Planning Division concurs and for which funds are available. Preparation of the plan of work is the responsibility of and must be approved by the applicant, the responsible State agency, and the State Conservationist. The plan sets forth the responsibilities of the applicant, the State, and USDA in carrying out the study and interpreting and using the data in a local floodplain management program. The State agency responsible for floodplain management activities may establish priorities on which to base the sequence of approval of floodplain management studies within its State. The number of studies started each Federal fiscal year is governed by the availability of funds and personnel and the amount of State and local assistance available.
( c ) States and communities are encouraged to make monetary or in-kind contributions toward the floodplain management study. The State and local share may reflect in-kind contributions in lieu of fund transfers.
#### Neil R. Averill, as Limited Administrator of the Estate of James R. Averill, Deceased, Appellant, v. Ben Atkins, Doing Business as Tent City and Rochester Surplus Merchandise, Inc., Respondent.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Memorandum: The plaintiff should have been permitted to amend the pleadings to conform with the proof so as to allege that the rifle was purchased by William Moulton for Donald Averill and not for the plaintiff’s intestate, James Averill. The court refused to do so on the ground it would result in a departure from the theory of the complaint. There was no surprise to the defendant since at the examination before trial William Moulton testified he received $80 from Donald Averill to make the purchase of the gun and the bill of particulars stated that the purchase was made for the brother of the deceased. This was the testimony on trial and no objection was taken. In such a situation the pleadings would be deemed amended to conform to the proof *(Di Rosse*v. *Wein,*24 A D 2d 510). Such an amendment would have permitted the jury to determine if William Moulton was just a front or an agent and that the sale was made to Donald Averill, a person under the age of 16 years, in violation of subdivision 5 of section 1898 of the Penal Law. In any event the question of common-law negligence should have been submitted to the jury. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Trial Term dismissing complaint in action for damages for wrongful death.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Witmer, Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.
§ 75.39 Use of file samples. ( a ) File samples which are retained by inspection personnel in accordance with the regulations may be deemed representative for appeal inspections: Provided, that ( 1 ) the samples have remained in the custody of the inspection personnel who certificated the inspection; and
( 2 ) the inspection personnel who performed the inspection and the inspection personnel who are to perform the appeal inspection determine that the sample was representative of the seed at the time of the inspection and that the quality or condition of the seed in the sample and in the lot has not changed since the time of the inspection.
( b ) Upon request of the applicant, and if practicable, a new sample may be obtained and examined as a part of an appeal inspection.
52.247-4 Inspection of Shipping and Receiving Facilities.       As prescribed in 47.207-1(c), insert the following provision in solicitations for transportation or for transportation-related services when it is desired for offerors to inspect the shipping, receiving, or other sites to ensure realistic bids:          Inspection of Shipping and Receiving Facilities (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            Offerors are urged to inspect the shipping and receiving facilities where services are to be performed and to satisfy themselves regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the cost of contract performance.                                          (b) 						            Site visits have been scheduled as follows:                __________________________________________________ (*Locations)*                __________________________________________________ (*Dates*)                __________________________________________________ (*Times*)                                          (c) 						            For further information offerors may contact:                __________________________________________________ (*Name*)                __________________________________________________ (*Telephone*)                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
§ 718.105 Tolerances and adjustments. ( a ) Tolerance is the amount by which the determined acreage for a crop may differ from the reported acreage or allotment for the crop and still be considered in compliance with program requirements under §§ 718.102(b)(1), (b)(3) and (b)(5).
( b ) Tolerance rules apply to those fields for which a staking and referencing was performed but such acreage was not planted according to those measurements or when a measurement service is not requested for acreage destroyed to meet program requirements.
( c ) Tolerance rules do not apply to: ( 1 ) Program requirements of §§ 718.102(b)(2), (b)(4) and (b)(6);
( 2 ) Official fields upon which the entire field is devoted to one crop;
( 3 ) Those fields for which staking and referencing was performed and such acreage was planted according to those measurements; or
( 4 ) The adjusted acreage for farms using measurement after planting which have a determined acreage greater than the marketing quota crop allotment.
( d ) If the acreage report for a crop is outside the tolerance for that crop: ( 1 ) FSA may consider the requirements of §§ 718.102 (b)(1), (b)(3) and (b)(5) not to have been met;
( 2 ) Participants may be ineligible for all or a portion of payments or benefits subject to the requirements of §§ 718.102 (b)(1), (b)(3) and (b)(5); and
( 3 ) Participants may be ineligible for all or a portion of payments or benefits under a program that requires accurate crop acreage reports under rules governing the program.
[68 FR 16176, Apr. 3, 2003, as amended at 80 FR 41996, July 16, 2015; 84 FR 45887, Sept. 3, 2019]
#### § 4287.400 OMB control number.

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the information collection requirements contained in the subsequent interim rule have been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB Control Number 0570-0065 for approval. A person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 257 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide grant eligibility for a 

State that adopts a program for the impoundment of vehicles operated 

by persons while under the influence of alcohol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2005 

Mr. CORZINE (for himself and Mr. LAUTENBERG) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 

and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide grant 

eligibility for a State that adopts a program for the 

impoundment of vehicles operated by persons while under 

the influence of alcohol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘John’s Law of 2005’’. 

5 SEC. 2. ALCOHOL-IMPAIRED DRIVING COUNTERMEASURES. 

6 Section 410(b)(1) of title 23, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 
2 

•S 257 IS 

1 ‘‘(H) PROGRAM FOR IMPOUNDMENT OF

2 VEHICLES.—A program to impound a vehicle 

3 for no less than 12 hours that is operated by 

4 a person who is arrested for operating the vehi5 cle while under the influence of alcohol.’’. 

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Edward Engle, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, *672rendered November 16, 1966, affirmed (Code Crim. Pro., § 542). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.