alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
52.236-4 Physical Data.

As prescribed in 36.504 , insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price

construction contract is contemplated and physical data (e.g., test borings, hydrographic, weather

conditions data) will be furnished or made available to offerors. All information to be furnished or

made available to offerors before award that pertains to the performance of the work should be

identified in the clause. When paragraphs are not applicable they may be deleted.

Physical Data (Apr 1984)

Data and information furnished or referred to below is for the Contractor’s information. The

Government shall not be responsible for any interpretation of or conclusion drawn from the data or

information by the Contractor.

(a) The indications of physical conditions on the drawings and in the specifications are the result of

site investigations by __________ [insert a description of investigational methods used, such as

surveys, auger borings, core borings, test pits, probings, test tunnels].

(b) Weather conditions __________ [insert a summary of weather records and warnings].

(c) Transportation facilities _________ [insert a summary of transportation facilities providing access

from the site, including information about their availability and limitations].

(d) ___________ [insert other pertinent information].

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.236 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 23.3**

** **

 **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIEDPUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS** 

** **

We have issued our report dated March 12, 2014, with respectto the financial statements of Katonah 2007-I CLO Ltd., included in the Annual Report of KCAP Financial, Inc. on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2013. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statementsof KCAP Financial, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-175838, effective July 28, 2011; and File No. 333-151995, effective June 27,2008).

 

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

 

New York, New York

March 12, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2758 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2758

   To amend the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act with 
 respect to the labeling of cigarette packages, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2006

 Mr. Lieberman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act with 
 respect to the labeling of cigarette packages, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cigarette Litter Prevention Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRED STATEMENT ON CIGARETTE PACKAGES.

    Section 4(a) of the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act 
(15 U.S.C. 1333(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4)(A) It shall be unlawful for any person to 
        manufacture, package, or import for sale or distribution within 
        the United States any cigarettes the package of which fails to 
        bear, in accordance with the regulations promulgated by the 
        Secretary under subparagraph (B), the following statement: 
        `Please dispose of all cigarette waste properly. Do not 
        litter.'.
            ``(B) Not later than 180 days after the Cigarette Litter 
        Prevention Act, the Secretary shall promulgate regulations with 
        respect to the placement, format, and type style of the label 
        statement required under subparagraph (A).''.
                                 <all>
```
Subpart 34.1 - Testing, Qualification and Use

of Industrial Resources Developed Under

TitleIII, Defense Production Act

Parent topic: Part 34 - Major System Acquisition

34.100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for the testing, qualification, and use of industrial

resources manufactured or developed with assistance provided under section 301, 302, or 303 of the

Defense Production Act (50 U.S.C. App.2091-2093). TitleIII of the Defense Production Act authorizes

various forms of Government assistance to encourage expansion of production capacity and supply

of industrial resources essential to national defense.

34.101 Definitions.

Item of supply, as used in this subpart, means any individual part, component, subassembly,

assembly, or subsystem integral to a major system, and other property which may be replaced

during the service life of the system. The term includes spare parts and replenishment parts, but

does not include packaging or labeling associated with shipment or identification of an "item."

34.102 Policy.

It is the policy of the Government, as required by Section 126 of Public Law102-558, to pay for any

testing and qualification required for the use or incorporation of the industrial resources

manufactured or developed with assistance provided under TitleIII of the Defense Production Act

of1950.

34.103 Testing and qualification.

(a) Contractors receiving requests from a TitleIII project contractor for testing and qualification of a

TitleIII industrial resource shall refer such requests to the contracting officer. The contracting

officer shall evaluate the request in accordance with agency procedures to determine whether: (1)

the TitleIII industrial resource is being or potentially may be used in the development or

manufacture of a major system or item of supply; and (2) for major systems in production, remaining

quantities to be acquired are sufficient to justify incurring the cost of testing and qualification. In

evaluating this request, the contracting officer shall consult with the Defense Production Act Office,

TitleIII Program, located at:

Wright Patterson Air Force Base OH 45433-7739.
(b) If the determination at 34.103(a) is affirmative, the contracting officer shall modify the contract

to require the contractor to test the TitleIII industrial resource for qualification.

(c) The Defense Production Act Office, TitleIII Program, shall provide to the contractor the industrial

resource produced by the TitleIII project contractor in sufficient amounts to meet testing needs.

34.104 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.234-1, Industrial Resources Developed under TitleIII, Defense Production Act,

in all contracts for major systems and items of supply.
52.247-53 Freight Classification Description.       As prescribed in 47.305-9(b)(1), insert the following provision in solicitations when the supplies being acquired are new to the supply system, nonstandard, or modifications of previously shipped items, and different freight classifications may apply:          Freight Classification Description (Apr 1984)          Offerors are requested to indicate below the full Uniform Freight Classification (rail) description, or the National Motor Freight Classification description applicable to the supplies, the same as offeror uses for commercial shipment. This description should include the packing of the commodity (box, crate, bundle, loose, setup, knocked down, compressed, unwrapped, etc.), the container material (fiberboard, wooden, etc.), unusual shipping dimensions, and other conditions affecting traffic descriptions. The Government will use these descriptions as well as other information available to determine the classification description most appropriate and advantageous to the Government. Offeror understands that shipments on any f.o.b. origin contract awarded, as a result of this solicitation, will be made in conformity with the shipping classification description specified by the Government, which may be different from the classification description furnished         below.          For Freight Classification Purposes, Offeror Describes This Commodity as ___________.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
```

[107th Congress Private Law 4]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl004.107]

Private Law 107-4
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 For the relief of Eugene Makuch. <<NOTE: Oct. 4, 2002 -  [H.R. 487]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT.

    In consideration of the fact that Eugene Makuch--
            (1) served as a foreign counterintelligence agent and 
        dedicated his life to assist the Federal Bureau of Investigation 
        in its efforts at the height of the Cold War to combat 
        communism, the Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti (KGB), and 
        the Soviet Union, and
            (2) has not received employment assistance or health, social 
        security, or pension benefits, despite assurances that he would 
        receive such benefits upon his retirement,

the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of funds not otherwise 
appropriated, the sum of $1,000,000 to Eugene Makuch of East Amherst, 
New York, in compensation for the lifetime aggregate value of benefits 
earned but not received by Eugene Makuch.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM.

    The sum paid under section 1 shall be in full satisfaction of any 
claims that Eugene Makuch may have against the United States arising out 
of his service for the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY FEES.

    Not more than 10 percent of the sum paid under section 1 shall be 
paid to or received by any agent or attorney for services rendered in 
connection with the recovery of such sum. Any person who violates this 
section shall be fined under title 18, United States Code.
```
#### § 652.41 Effect of filing deadlines.

A technical service provider's failure to meet the filing deadlines under this subpart will result in the forfeiture of appeal rights. All filings must be received by NRCS no later than the close of business (5 p.m.) the last day of the filing period.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony W. Kessler, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered May 9, 1979 (the date on the clerk’s extract is May 8, 1979), affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Gibbons, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur
#### In re SCHERZER, Respondent, v. MARTIN et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 15, 1906.)

In the matter of the application of Herman Scherzer against Sarah Martin and others.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2690 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2690

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2006

             Referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 8801 Sudley Road in Manassas, Virginia, as the ``Harry J. Parrish 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HARRY J. PARRISH POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8801 Sudley Road, Manassas, Virginia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Harry J. Parrish Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Harry J. 
Parrish Post Office.

            Passed the Senate July 20, 2006.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SYNTELLECT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF SEPTEMBER
30, 2000, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF SYNTELLECT, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,139
<SECURITIES>                                     1,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                       702
<INVENTORY>                                      1,085
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,742
<PP&E>                                          12,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,839
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,282
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           144
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,367
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,158
<SALES>                                         17,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,203
<CGS>                                            4,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   316
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,229
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,229
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
§ 755.3 Time and method of application. ( a ) To be eligible for payment, producers must obtain and submit a completed application for payment and meet other eligibility requirements specified in this part. Producers may obtain an application in person, by mail, or by facsimile from any county FSA office. In addition, producers may download a copy of the application at *http://www.sc.egov.usda.gov .*
( b ) An application for payment must be submitted on a completed application form. Applications and any other supporting documentation must be submitted to the FSA county office serving the county where the agricultural operation is located, but, in any case, must be received by the FSA county office by the close of business on the last day of the application period established by the Deputy Administrator.
( c ) All producers who incurred transportation costs for eligible reimbursements and who share in the risk of an agricultural operation must certify to the information on the application before the application will be considered complete. FSA may require the producer to provide documentation to support all verifiable records.
( d ) Each producer requesting payment under this part must certify to the accuracy and truthfulness of the information provided in their application and any supporting documentation. All information provided is subject to verification by FSA. Refusal to allow FSA or any other agency of the Department of Agriculture to verify any information provided will result in a denial of eligibility. Furnishing the information is voluntary; however, without it program benefits will not be approved. Providing a false certification to the Federal Government may be punishable by imprisonment, fines and other penalties or sanctions.
( e ) To ensure all producers are provided an opportunity to submit actual costs for reimbursement at the actual cost rate, applicants will have 30 days after the end of the FY to provide supporting documentation of actual transportation costs to the FSA County Office. The actual costs documented in supporting documentation will override previously reported costs of eligible reimbursable costs at the fixed or set rate made during the application period.
( f ) If verifiable records are not provided to FSA, the producer will be ineligible for payment.
( g ) If supporting documentation is provided within 30 days after the end of the FY, but an application was not submitted to the applicable FSA County Office before the end of the application period, the producer is not eligible for payment.
( h ) Producers who submit applications after the application period are not entitled to any payment consideration or determination of eligibility. Regardless of the reason why an application is not submitted to or received by FSA, any application received after the close of business on such date will not be eligible for benefits under this program.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-169-WKW

 )

DARNELL MONTREZE BROWN )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion for writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum, filed April

25, 2007, and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court is hereby DIRECTED

to issue a WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM addressed to Chilton County Jail,

Clanton, Alabama, commanding it to deliver Darnell Montreze Brown to any United States Marshal

or Deputy United States Marshal, and directing said Marshal or Deputy to bring said prisoner before

this court, to be held at Montgomery, Alabama, on April 26, 2007, at 4:00 pm, and to return the

prisoner to said official when the court shall have finished with him.

Done, this 25th day of April, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 210 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### §§ 701.26-701.30 [Reserved]
P.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

18) IV-E-6 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 9:15:26 AM Sheet 18 of 105 
P.2 

A-83-27 

IV-E-6 

CONTACT REPORT 

Date /vAw. u inc. Originator /l/WcTTY 

CONTACT BY: TELEPHONE ^ MEETING D Other 

NAME, TITLE & ORGANIZATION 3W i & tfo/lte/J 

ADDRESS & TELEPHONE NUMBER //(5 / CorV/KCTfW fa 

PURPOSE OR SUBJECT (Give project number if appropriate) 

QR&vJTtf fll€*n>S «0 IfWrf-tfiL 8c.(cells 

SUMMARY 

ACTION CO 

Distribution:
§ 635.4 Failure to fully comply. The Chief may grant equitable relief to any participant that NRCS determines is not in full compliance with the requirements, terms and conditions of a covered program, and therefore ineligible for a payment, or other benefit, if the participant— ( a ) Made a good faith effort to comply fully with the requirements; and
( b ) Rendered substantial performance.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LAVAROS DAVIS 

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 3:20cv5935-MCR-HTC

MARK S. INCH, et al. 

Defendants. 

__________________________/ 

 

DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE STATUS 

CONFERENCE

Defendants Vaughn, Nousiainen, Daniels, and Newcomb (“Defendants”), 

through counsel, and pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 6.1, hereby respectfully move the 

Court to continue the status conference scheduled for June 20, 2023, as the parties 

have agreed to settle the case. (Doc. 149). Defendants state the following in support 

thereof: 

STATEMENT OF FACTS

1. On May 26, 2023, the Court entered an Order, setting a status conference for 

Tuesday, June 20, 2023, at 11:30 a.m. (CST) for purposes of setting pretrial 

deadlines and setting a trial date. (Doc. 145). 

2. On June 15, 2023, Defendants filed a Notice to of Settlement, notifying the 

Court that the parties in this action have agreed to a settlement in this case, 

Case 3:20-cv-05935-HTC Document 150 Filed 06/16/23 Page 1 of 3
settling all claims between Plaintiff and Defendants, and settling claims by

Plaintiff against unserved parties for claims he raised pursuant to his Motion for 

Order to Show Cause. (Doc(s) 147, 149) 

3. Presently, the parties are completing the required settlement documentation. As 

the settlement negates the necessity of a status conference, to preserve judicial 

resources, the parties move to continue the status conference as they have 

agreed to settlement of all claims in this case.

CONCLUSION

WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, Defendants respectfully request the 

Court continue the status conference as the parties have agreed to settlement in this 

case.

Respectfully submitted,

ASHLEY MOODY

 ATTORNEY GENERAL 

 /s/Ravi N. Sharma 

 Ravi N. Sharma 

Assistant Attorney General

Florida Bar No.: 1019119 

Office of the Attorney General 

 The Capitol, Suite PL-01 

Tallahassee Florida 32399-1050 

 Telephone: (850) 414-3300 

Facsimile: (850) 488-4872 

 Ravi.Sharma@myfloridalegal.com

CERTIFICATE OF GOOD FAITH CONFERRAL 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have conferred with opposing counsel in good 

Case 3:20-cv-05935-HTC Document 150 Filed 06/16/23 Page 2 of 3
3

faith and opposing counsel does not oppose the requested relief. 

 /s/ Ravi N. Sharma

 Ravi N. Sharma, Esq. 

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH WORD LIMIT

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above Motion totals 414 word and does not 

exceed the 8,000 word maximum pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1. 

 /s/ Ravi N. Sharma

 Ravi N. Sharma, Esq. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing Unopposed Motion to 

Continue Status Conference has been electronically filed with the Clerk of Court and 

served on all counsel of record using CM/ECF on June 15, 2023. 

 /s/ Ravi N. Sharma

 Ravi N. Sharma, Esq. 

Case 3:20-cv-05935-HTC Document 150 Filed 06/16/23 Page 3 of 3