alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANTS [UN] AUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
[UN]  AUDITED  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 9 MONTHS [YEAR] THEN
ENDED  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       71710
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                             22135071
<ALLOWANCES>                                448024
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          33503511
<PP&E>                                    11334122
<DEPRECIATION>                              498250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            47353897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     40754751
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   8360229
<OTHER-SE>                                (1761083)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              47353897
<SALES>                                   45310533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          45310533
<CGS>                                     35132493
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             45686896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (740622)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            156156
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1162120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (954017)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (104514)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (847259)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (847259)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.04)


</TABLE>
# 52.222-57 [Reserved].

**Parent topic:**52.222 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

DAVID \ry. JAHN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

REGINALD JAMES WASHINGTON,

individually and cSC ENTERPRISES,

INC., d/b/a GROCERY SUPPLY

coMPANY,

Defendants.

DATE:

TIME:

PLACE:

Civil Action No.: 2:06-cv-623

NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DISCOVERY DOCUMENTS

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following discovery documents have been served upon

all parties to this action:

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION- Dr. James P. DeHaven

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

5:00 p.m.

Dothan Specialty Clinic

4300 West Main Street, Ste 102

Dothan, AL 36305

(334) 793-9s64

Dated February 9, 2007, 2007

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 17 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

s/Tenv G. Kev

Terry G. Key (KEY-011)

Christy L. Hayes (HAY-058)

Attomeys for Plaintiff

Post Office Box92l

Dothan, Alabama 36302

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served upon all counsel of record by placing

same in the U. S. mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as follows on this the 9th day of

February,2007:

Dr. James P. DeHaven

Dothan Specialty Clinic

4300 West Main Street. Ste 102

Dothan, AL 36305

Shane M. Oncale, Esq.

Eric D. Bonner, Esq.

Clark, Dolan, Morse, Oncale & Hair, P.C.

800 Shades Creek Pkwy., Ste 850

Birmingham, AL 35209

COCHRAN, CHERRY, GIVENS,

SMITH, LANE & TAYLOR, P.C.

s/Terr)¡ G. Ke)¡

Of Counsel

cc: Merill Legal Solutions Court Reporters

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 17 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

October 2, 2006

NOTICE OF ERROR

To: All Counsel of Record

Case Style: Brown v. Champion Enterprises, Inc. et al

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00642-MEF

Referenced Pleading: ORDER

Docket Entry Number: 13

The referenced ORDER was filed on **October 2, 2006** in this case and 

is hereby STRICKEN as a erroneous docket entry.

Parties are instructed to disregard #13 docketing entry, which has been stricken from the

record as a docketing error.

Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 14 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 51.3211 Diameter.

*Diameter* means the greatest dimension of the onion at right angles to a line running from the stem to the root.
§ 771.13 Loan closing. ( a ) *Conditions.* The applicant must meet all conditions specified by the loan approval official in the notification of loan approval prior to closing.
( b ) *Loan instruments and legal documents.* The borrower, through its authorized representatives will execute all loan instruments and legal documents required by FSA to evidence the debt, perfect the required security interest in property and assets securing the loan, and protect the Government's interest, in accordance with applicable State and Federal laws.
( c ) *Loan agreement.* A loan agreement between the borrower and FSA will be required. The agreement will set forth performance criteria and other loan requirements necessary to protect the Government's financial and programmatic interest and accomplish the objectives of the loan. Specific provisions of the agreement will be developed on a case-by-case basis to address the particular situation associated with the loan being made. However, all loan agreements will include at least the following provisions: ( 1 ) The borrower must submit audited financial statements to FSA at least annually;
( 2 ) The borrower will immediately notify FSA of any adverse actions such as: ( i ) Anticipated default on FSA debt;
( ii ) Potential recall vote of an assessment referendum; or
( iii ) Being named as a defendant in litigation;
( 3 ) Submission of other specific financial reports for the borrower;
( 4 ) The right of deferral under 7 U.S.C. 1981a; and
( 5 ) Applicable liquidation procedures upon default.
( d ) *Fees.* The borrower will pay all fees for recording any legal instruments determined to be necessary and all notary, lien search, and similar fees incident to loan transactions. No fees will be assessed for work performed by FSA employees.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Heelys, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Thomas C. Hansen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Lisa K. Peterson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



Date: March 12, 2010

By:

/s/ THOMAS C. HANSEN Thomas C. Hansen Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ LISA K. PETERSON Lisa K. Peterson Chief Financial Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an Exhibit to the Report.

---



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 15, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40725

Summary Calendar

ROBERT DANIEL KEYS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:02-CV-100

--------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Daniel Keys, Texas prisoner # 873144, filed a

28 U.S.C. § 2254 application which the district court dismissed

as time-barred. This court denied Keys’s request for a

certificate of appealability (COA) from the dismissal of that

application. Keys subsequently filed in the district court a

motion for relief from judgment pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P.

60(b)(1). When the district court denied that motion, Keys filed

a motion for rehearing by a three-judge panel, which the district
No. 05-40725

-2-

court also denied. Keys now seeks a certificate of appealability

(COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion for

rehearing by a three-judge panel.

Keys cites to no authority nor has any been found

establishing his right to a three-judge panel rehearing of the

denial of his Rule 60(b)(1) motion. As such, his motion was

unauthorized. Keys thus has appealed from the denial of a

meaningless, unauthorized motion. See United States v. Early,

27 3F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). Although the district court

denied the motion on the merits, it should have denied the motion

for lack of jurisdiction. Id. However, this court can and does

affirm on the alternative basis. Id. Keys’s request for a COA

is denied as unnecessary. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). Keys’s

motions for the appointment of counsel and for an en banc

consideration of his COA motion are also denied. See

FED. R. APP. P. 35(a); 5TH CIR. R. 35.6.

COA DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; AFFIRMED; MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT

OF COUNSEL AND EN BANC CONSIDERATION DENIED.
§ 760.816 Value loss crops. ( a ) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this part, this section applies to value loss crops and tropical crops. Unless otherwise specified, all the eligibility provisions of part 1437 of this title apply to value loss crops and tropical crops under this part.
( b ) For value loss crops, benefits under this part are calculated based on the loss of value at the time of the damaging weather or related condition, as determined by FSA.
( c ) For tropical crops: ( 1 ) CDP benefits for 2005 are calculated according to general provisions of part 1437, but not subpart F, of this title.
( 2 ) CDP benefits for 2006 and 2007 are calculated according to part 1437, subpart F of this title.
#### § 770.1 Purpose.

This part contains the Agency's policies and procedures for making and servicing loans to assist a Native American tribe or tribal corporation with the acquisition of land interests within the tribal reservation or Alaskan community.
52.215-15 Pension Adjustments and Asset Reversions.       As prescribed in 15.408(g), insert the following clause:          Pension Adjustments and Asset Reversions (Oct 2010)                                       (a) 						            The Contractor shall promptly notify the Contracting Officer in writing when it determines that it will terminate a defined-benefit pension plan or otherwise recapture such pension fund assets.                                          (b) 						            For segment closings, pension plan terminations, or curtailment of benefits, the amount of the adjustment shall be-                                                         (1) 								                For contracts and subcontracts that are subject to full coverage under the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) Board rules and regulations (48 CFR Chapter 99), the amount measured, assigned, and allocated in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.413-50(c)(12); and                                                            (2) 								                For contracts and subcontracts that are not subject to full coverage under the CAS, the amount measured, assigned, and allocated in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.413-50(c)(12), except the numerator of the fraction at 48 CFR 9904.413-50(c)(12)(vi) shall be the sum of the pension plan costs allocated to all non-CAS covered contracts and subcontracts that are subject to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) subpart  31.2 or for which certified cost or pricing data were submitted.                                                                             (c) 						            For all other situations where assets revert to the Contractor, or such assets are constructively received by it for any reason, the Contractor shall, at the Government’s option, make a refund or give a credit to the Government for its equitable share of the gross amount withdrawn. The Government’s equitable share shall reflect the Government’s participation in pension costs through those contracts for which certified cost or pricing data were submitted or that are subject to FAR subpart  31.2.                                          (d) 						            The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause in all subcontracts under this contract that meet the applicability requirement of FAR 15.408(g).                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.215 [Reserved]
§ 760.404 Eligible livestock. ( a ) To be considered eligible livestock for livestock owners, the kind of livestock must be alpacas, adult or non-adult dairy cattle, beef cattle, buffalo, beefalo, elk, emus, equine, llamas, sheep, goats, swine, poultry, deer, or reindeer and meet all the conditions in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) To be considered eligible livestock for contract growers, the kind of livestock must be poultry or swine as defined in § 760.402 and meet all the conditions in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) To be considered eligible livestock for the purpose of generating payments under this subpart, livestock must meet all of the following conditions: ( 1 ) Died as a direct result of an eligible adverse weather event that occurred on or after January 1, 2008, and before October 1, 2011;
( 2 ) Died no later than 60 calendar days from the ending date of the applicable adverse weather event, but before November 30, 2011;
( 3 ) Died in the calendar year for which benefits are being requested;
( 4 ) Been maintained for commercial use as part of a farming operation on the day they died; and
( 5 ) Before dying, not have been produced or maintained for reasons other than commercial use as part of a farming operation, such non-eligible uses being understood to include, but not be limited to, any uses of wild, free roaming animals or use of the animals for recreational purposes, such as pleasure, hunting, roping, pets, or for show.
( d ) The following categories of animals owned by a livestock owner are eligible livestock and calculations of eligibility for payments will be calculated separately for each producer with respect to each category: ( 1 ) Adult beef bulls;
( 2 ) Adult beef cows;
( 3 ) Adult buffalo or beefalo bulls;
( 4 ) Adult buffalo or beefalo cows;
( 5 ) Adult dairy bulls;
( 6 ) Adult dairy cows;
( 7 ) Alpacas;
( 8 ) Chickens, broilers, pullets;
( 9 ) Chickens, chicks;
( 10 ) Chickens, layers, roasters;
( 11 ) Deer;
( 12 ) Ducks;
( 13 ) Ducks, ducklings;
( 14 ) Elk;
( 15 ) Emus;
( 16 ) Equine;
( 17 ) Geese, goose;
( 18 ) Geese, gosling;
( 19 ) Goats, bucks;
( 20 ) Goats, nannies;
( 21 ) Goats, kids;
( 22 ) Llamas;
( 23 ) Non-adult beef cattle;
( 24 ) Non-adult buffalo or beefalo;
( 25 ) Non-adult dairy cattle;
( 26 ) Reindeer;
( 27 ) Sheep, ewes;
( 28 ) Sheep, lambs;
( 29 ) Sheep, rams;
( 30 ) Swine, feeder pigs under 50 pounds;
( 31 ) Swine, sows, boars, barrows, gilts 50 to 150 pounds;
( 32 ) Swine, sows, boars, barrows, gilts over 150 pounds;
( 33 ) Turkeys, poults; and
( 34 ) Turkeys, toms, fryers, and roasters.
( e ) The following categories of animals are eligible livestock for contract growers and calculations of eligibility for payments will be calculated separately for each producer with respect to each category: ( 1 ) Chickens, broilers, pullets;
( 2 ) Chickens, layers, roasters;
( 3 ) Geese, goose;
( 4 ) Swine, boars, sows;
( 5 ) Swine, feeder pigs;
( 6 ) Swine, lightweight barrows, gilts;
( 7 ) Swine, sows, boars, barrows, gilts; and
( 8 ) Turkeys, toms, fryers, and roasters.
[74 FR 31575, July 2, 2009, as amended at 76 FR 54075, Aug. 31, 2011]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2888 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Lambda-Cyhalothrin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on LambdaCyhalothrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAMBDA-CYHALOTHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.09 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Lambda-Cyhalothrin) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2888 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-169-WKW

 )

WILMONT TIMOTHY BARNETT )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the government's motion for release of prisoner filed on March 29,

2007, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is GRANTED.

It is hereby ORDERED that the United States Marshals Service release custody of Wilmont

Timothy Barnett, to Todd Mims, DEA, on March 30, 2007, through June 30, 2007, so that said agent

can take such prisoner into custody without the necessity of the presence of a Deputy United States

Marshal.

It is further ORDERED that Todd Mims, DEA, return said prisoner into the custody of the

United States Marshals Service when he has finished with him.

DONE this the ______ day of March, 2007.

______________________________

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 157-2 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 51.694 Similar varietal characteristics.

*Similar varietal characteristics* means that the fruits in any container are similar in color and shape.
212.212 Computer software.       (1)  Departments and agencies shall identify and evaluate, at all stages of the acquisition process (including concept refinement, concept decision, and technology development), opportunities for the use of commercial computer software and other non-developmental software in accordance with Section 803 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Pub. L. 110-417).          (2)  See Subpart 208.74 when acquiring commercial software or software maintenance.  See                 227.7202              for policy on the acquisition of commercial computer software and commercial computer software documentation.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 212.2 - SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

December 20, 2006

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: VFS Leasing Co. v. G. F. Kelly, Inc. et al

Case Number: 3:06-cv-00638-SRW

Referenced Pleading: NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DISCOVERY

Docket Entry Number: 16

The referenced pleading was electronically filed on ***December 19, 2006*** in this case and

is not in compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******This pleading is discovery and is not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 NON-FILING

OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleading is hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to disregard

the entry of this pleading on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the striking of

this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 17 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:01cr29-SPM

GENE ATKINS,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER CORRECTING SENTENCE

On August 1, 2011, the Court found Defendant violated the terms and 

conditions of his supervised release by committing six technical or misdemeanor

violations and one Grade A violation (possession of cocaine). The sentencing

guideline range for the Grade A violation was 51 to 60 months. The Court found

that a sentence at the bottom of the range was appropriate for Defendant and

sentenced Defendant to a term of 51 months imprisonment with no supervised

release to follow.

The probation office advised the Court on August 2, 2011, that

Defendant’s possession of cocaine should actually be a Grade B violation

because the possession was not with the intent to sell. The correct guideline

Case 4:01-cr-00029-SPM Document 154 Filed 08/02/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

range, based on the Grade B violation, is 21 to 27 months. Had the Court been

aware of Defendant’s correct guideline range, the 51 month sentence would not

have been imposed.

Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(a), the Court has the

authority to “correct a sentence that resulted from arithmetical, technical, or other

clear error.” Defendant’s sentence of 51 months is the result of arithmetical,

technical, and clear error. The Court has already determined that a sentence at

the bottom of the guideline range is appropriate for Defendant. Defendant’s

sentence should be corrected to be imposed at the bottom of the 21 to 27 month

guideline range. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Defendant’s sentence is corrected and reduced from a term of 51

months imprisonment to a term of 21 months imprisonment. 

2. All other terms and conditions of the sentence imposed on August

1, 2011 remain unchanged. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of August, 2011.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:01cr29-SPM

Case 4:01-cr-00029-SPM Document 154 Filed 08/02/11 Page 2 of 2
#### § 764.459 Evaluation of borrower progress.

(a) The vendor must provide the Agency with a periodic progress report for each borrower enrolled in training in accordance with the agreement to complete training. The reports will indicate whether the borrower is attending sessions, completing the training program, and demonstrating an understanding of the course material.

(b) Upon borrower completion of the training, the vendor must provide the Agency with an evaluation of the borrower's knowledge of the course material and assign a score. The following table lists the possible scores, the criteria used to assign each score, and Agency consideration of each score:

| Score | Criteria used to determine score | Agency consideration |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | If the borrower: | |
| | • Attended sessions as agreed, • Satisfactorily completed all assignments, and • Demonstrated an understanding of the course material. | Training requirement associated with course is complete. |
| 2 | If the borrower: | |
| | • Attended sessions as agreed, and • Attempted to complete all assignments, but • Does not demonstrate an understanding of the course material. | Training requirement associated with couse is complete. Additional Agency supervision may be necessary. |
| 3 | If the borrower did not: | |
| | • Attend sessions as agreed, or • Attempt to complete assignments, or • Otherwise make a good faith effort to complete the training. | Training requirement associated with course is not complete. The borrower is ineligible for future direct loans until the training is completed. |
#### § 780.16 Implementation of final agency decisions.

To the extent practicable, no later than 30 calendar days after an agency decision becomes a final administrative decision of USDA, FSA will implement the decision.