alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 633.12 Termination of agreements. ( a ) The State Conservationist may, by mutual agreement with the parties to the agreement, consent to the termination of the agreement where: ( 1 ) The parties to the agreement are unable to comply with the terms of the agreement as the result of conditions beyond their control;
( 2 ) Compliance with the terms of the agreement would work a severe hardship on the parties to the agreement; or
( 3 ) Termination of the agreement would be in the public interest.
( b ) If an agreement is terminated in accordance with the provisions of this section, the annual payment for the year in which the agreement is terminated shall not be considered to have been earned unless there is compliance with the terms and conditions of the agreement for the entire calendar year.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  Banc of America Funding Corporation
  Mortgage Pass Through Certificates,
  Series 2006-H

  I, Chris Regnier, a Vice President of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the "Master
  Servicer") certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of the Banc of America Funding 2006-H Trust (the
     "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     master servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review
     conducted in preparing the master servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its
     obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement, in all material
     respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Bank of America, National Association and Opteum Financial Services, LLC.


     Dated:    May 30, 2008

     /s/ Chris Regnier
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
27.203-1 General.       (a) 						            Unauthorized disclosure of classified subject matter, whether in patent applications or resulting from the issuance of a patent, may be a violation of 18 U.S.C. 792, *et seq*. (Chapter 37-Espionage and Censorship), and related statutes, and may be contrary to the interests of national security.                                          (b) 						            Upon receipt of a patent application under paragraph (a) or (b) of the clause at 52.227-10, Filing of Patent Applications-Classified Subject Matter, the contracting officer shall ascertain the proper security classification of the patent application. If the application contains classified subject matter, the contracting officer shall inform the contractor how to transmit the application to the United States Patent Office in accordance with procedures provided by legal counsel. If the material is classified "Secret" or higher, the contracting officer shall make every effort to notify the contractor within 30 days of the Government’s determination, pursuant to paragraph (a) of the clause.                                          (c) 						            Upon receipt of information furnished by the contractor under paragraph (d) of the clause at 52.227-10, the contracting officer shall promptly submit that information to legal counsel in order that the steps necessary to ensure the security of the application will be taken.                                          (d) 						            The contracting officer shall act promptly on requests for approval of foreign filing under paragraph (c) of the clause at 52.227-10 in order to avoid the loss of valuable patent rights of the Government or the contractor.    **Parent topic:** 27.203 Security requirements for patent applications containing classified subject matter.
§ 759.2 Purpose. ( a ) This part specifies the types of incidents that can result in an area being determined a disaster area, which under other regulations makes qualified farmers in such areas eligible for Emergency loans (EM) or eligible for such other assistance that may be available, based on Secretarial disaster designations. Nothing in this part overrides provision of those regulations that govern the actual administration and availability of the disaster assistance regulations.
( b ) This part specifies the responsibility of the County Emergency Board (CEB), State Emergency Board (SEB), and the State Executive Director (SED) in regard to Secretarial Designations with regards to disasters. It also addresses matters relating to the handling of a Presidential declaration of disaster or the imposition of a USDA quarantine by the Secretary with respect to triggering the availability of EM loans.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00130-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.B., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 231st District Court

of Tarrant County (231-700012-21)

October 6, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
52.214-12 Preparation of Bids.       As prescribed in 14.201-6(f), insert the following provision:          Preparation of Bids (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            Bidders are expected to examine the drawings, specifications, Schedule, and all instructions. Failure to do so will be at the bidder’s risk.                                          (b) 						            Each bidder shall furnish the information required by the solicitation. The bidder shall sign the bid and print or type its name on the Schedule and each continuation sheet on which it makes an entry. Erasures or other changes must be initialed by the person signing the bid. Bids signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.                                          (c) 						            For each item offered, bidders shall (1) show the unit price, including, unless otherwise specified, packaging, packing, and preservation and (2) enter the extended price for the quantity of each item offered in the "Amount" column of the Schedule. In case of discrepancy between a unit price and an extended price, the unit price will be presumed to be correct, subject, however, to correction to the same extent and in the same manner as any other mistake.                                          (d) 						            Bids for supplies or services other than those specified will not be considered unless authorized by the solicitation.                                          (e) 						            Bidders must state a definite time for delivery of supplies or for performance of services, unless otherwise specified in the solicitation.                                          (f) 						            Time, if stated as a number of days, will include Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays.                                 (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.214 [Reserved]
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 2 of 2
# 28.101 Bid guarantees.

- 28.101-1 Policy on use. 
- 28.101-2 Solicitation provision or contract clause. 
- 28.101-3 Authority of an attorney-in-fact for a bid bond. 
- 28.101-4 Noncompliance with bid guarantee requirements. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 28.1 - Bonds and Other Financial Protections
**EXHIBIT 31**

** **

**LONG BEACH SECURITIES CORP.**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Douglas A. Potolsky, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to befiled in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10–K of Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-8 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain anyuntrue statement of a  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to beprovided under Form 10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with Servicing Criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with Servicing Criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Deutsche BankNational Trust Company.

 

Dated:  March 15, 2007

 

LONG BEACH SECURITIES CORP.

 

 

By:   /s/ Douglas A. Potolsky  _______Name:  Douglas A. PotolskyTitle:    Senior Vice President
#### § 75.48 Identification number.

The Director may require the use of official identification numbers in connection with seed certificated or sampled under the Act. When identification numbers are required, they shall be specified by the Director and shall be attached to, or stamped, printed, or stenciled on the lot of seed certificated or sampled in a manner specified by the Director.
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 5:97cr24LAC

CALVIN JOHNSON

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on MAY 2, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 4/24/208 Doc.# 178

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 8th day of

August, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) The mandatory minimum sentence of 240 months is still mandated regardless of

any change or amendment to the guidelines. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 5:97-cr-00024-LC-MD Document 179 Filed 08/08/08 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2690 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2690

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 8801 Sudley Road in Manassas, Virginia, as the ``Harry J. Parrish 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HARRY J. PARRISH POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8801 Sudley Road, Manassas, Virginia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Harry J. Parrish Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Harry J. 
Parrish Post Office.

            Passed the Senate July 20, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2690

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 8801 Sudley Road in Manassas, Virginia, as the ``Harry J. Parrish 
                             Post Office''.
```
#### § 760.32 Instructions and forms.

The Deputy Administrator shall cause to be prepared such forms and instructions as are necessary for carrying out the regulations in this subpart. Affected farmers and manufacturers may obtain information necessary to make application for a dairy indemnity payment from the county FSA office. Form FSA-373—Application for Indemnity Payment, is available at the county ASC office.

[43 FR 10535, Mar. 14, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 24689, June 8, 1982]
§ 75.29 When an appeal may be refused. A request for an appeal inspection may be refused if: ( a ) The reasons for an appeal inspection are frivolous or not substantial;
( b ) The quality or condition of the seed has been altered since the inspection covering the seed on which the appeal inspection is requested;
( c ) The lot in question in a lot inspection is not or cannot be made accessible for sampling;
( d ) The lot relative to which appeal inspection is requested cannot be positively identified by the inspection as the lot from which drawn samples were previously inspected in a lot inspection; or
( e ) The application is not in compliance with the regulations; and
( f ) Such applicant shall be notified promptly of the reason for such refusal.
#### § 652.42 Recertification.

A decertified technical service provider may apply to be re-certified under the certification provisions of this part after the period of decertification has expired. A technical service provider may not utilize the certification renewal process in an attempt to be recertified after being decertified.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2014170EN.01006601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 11.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 170/66 |

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 158 of 27 May 2014](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2014_158_R_TOC)
)

On page 86, Article 5(1)(b):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | the financial year immediately preceding the period referred to in point (a) in relation to the services listed in point (g) of the second subparagraph.’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | the financial year immediately preceding the period referred to in point (a) in relation to the services listed in point (e) of the second subparagraph.’. |

---
#### Empire Livestock Marketing Cooperative, Inc., Respondent, v L. Walter Byrd, Doing Business as Norwich Veal and Beef, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of plaintiff, entered September 7, 1979 in Tompkins County, upon a decision of the court at Trial Term, without a jury. The plaintiff sued defendant, L. Walter Byrd, individually, for cattle purchased at auction at two of plaintiff’s markets. The court awarded plaintiff a verdict against the defendant in the amount of $3,436.44 for purchases made at Governeur Market, but dismissed the claim as to purchases made at the Oneonta Market. At issue at the trial was whether the defendant disclosed his agency status and the identity of his principal to the plaintiff so as to hold the principal solely liable for the purchases made. On this -critical point, plaintiff’s witnesses’ testimony conflicted with that of the defendant and his wife. The issue of credibility was resolved against the defendant. Judgment was granted for all the purchases made where the invoices were signed by the defendant and disallowed as to the one which he did not sign. Defendant contends that the purchases were made by him solely for Norwich *947Veal and Beef, Inc., a corporation owned by his wife. He points to the fact that the invoices reflecting the sale were made out by plaintiff’s employees to Norwich Veal and Beef and that payment was made by corporate checks. He also claims that he disclosed his principal’s name to the plaintiff. A review of the record discloses that there is no reason to disturb the decision of the trial court. Where the judgment depends heavily on the credibility of witnesses as here, the appellate court must weigh the advantage possessed by the trial court which saw and heard the witnesses, and should defer to its judgment *(Smith v Smith,*273 NY 380). Judgment affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
#### § 60.133 Wild fish and shellfish.

*Wild fish and shellfish* means naturally-born or hatchery-originated fish or shellfish released in the wild, and caught, taken, or harvested from non-controlled waters or beds; and fillets, steaks, nuggets, and any other flesh from a wild fish or shellfish.
Subpart 241.1 - GENERAL

Parent topic: Part 241 - ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

241.101 Definitions.

As used in this part—

“Independent regulatory body” means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, a state-wide

agency, or an agency with less than state-wide jurisdiction when operating pursuant to state

authority. The body has the power to fix, establish, or control the rates and services of utility

suppliers.

“Nonindependent regulatory body” means a body that regulates a utility supplier which is owned or

operated by the same entity that created the regulatory body, e.g., a municipal utility.

“Regulated utility supplier” means a utility supplier regulated by an independent regulatory body.

“Service power procurement officer” means for the—

Army, the Chief of Engineers;

Navy, the Commander, Naval Facilities Engineering Command;

Air Force, the head of a contracting activity; and

Defense Logistics Agency, the head of a contracting activity.

241.102 Applicability.

(a) This part applies to purchases of utility services from nonregulated and regulated utility

suppliers. It includes the acquisition of liquefied petroleum gas as a utility service when purchased

from regulated utility suppliers.

(b)(7) This part does not apply to third party financed projects. However, it may be used for any

purchased utility services directly resulting from such projects, including those authorized by—

(A) 10 U.S.C. 2394 for energy, fuels, and energy production facilities for periods not to exceed 30

years;

(B) 10 U.S.C. 2394a for renewable energy for periods not to exceed 25 years;

(C) 10 U.S.C. 2917 for geothermal resources that result in energy production facilities;
(D) 10 U.S.C. 2809 for potable and waste water treatment plants for periods not to exceed 32 years;

and

(E) 10 U.S.C. 2812 for lease/purchase of energy production facilities for periods not to exceed 32

years.

241.103 Statutory and delegated authority.

(1) The contracting officer may enter into a utility service contract related to the conveyance of a

utility system for a period not to exceed 50 years (10 U.S.C.2688(d)(2)).

(2) The contracting officer may enter into an energy savings contract under 10 U.S.C. 2913 for a

period not to exceed 25 years.

(3) See 217.174 for authority to enter into multiyear contracts for electricity from renewable energy

sources.

(4) See PGI 241.103 for statutory authorities and maximum contract periods for utility and energy

contracts.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBIN TURNER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5991-MCR-HTC

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation dated July 8, 2022 (ECF No. 19). The parties have been furnished 

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity 

to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There 

have been no timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, I have 

determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-05991-MCR-HTC Document 20 Filed 09/27/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5991-MCR-HTC

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

(1) The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. 19) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

(2) The decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is AFFIRMED.

(3) The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, pursuant 

to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §. 405(g), AFFIRMING the decision of the 

Commissioner.

(4) The clerk is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of September 2022.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05991-MCR-HTC Document 20 Filed 09/27/22 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 9-3 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 63.500 Compliance.

The Secretary shall review and monitor compliance by the Board and the NSIIC with the Act and this part.
#### § 52.16 Financial interest of inspector.

No inspector shall inspect any processed product in which he is directly or indirectly financially interested.