alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
215.404-70 DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines Method Application.       Follow the procedures at PGI                 215.404-70              for use of DD Form 1547 whenever a structured approach to profit analysis is required.    **Parent topic:** 215.404 Proposal analysis.
Archive

| This document was downloaded      and archived from http://www.opm.gov/hrd/lead/handbook2/Toc.htm      on June 1st, 2001. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jan S. Schatzberg, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board holding claimant ineligible for benefits effective November 1, 1965 because of a lack of total unemployment (Labor Law, § 522), charging him with an overpayment of $470.25 ruled to be recoverable, and holding that he willfully misrepresented to obtain benefits for which a forfeiture of 57 effective days was imposed (Labor Law, § 594). What constitutes “ total. unemployment ” is a factual decision and thus if the board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence it cannot be disturbed (e.g., *Matter of Weiss [Catherwood],*28 A D 2d 577). The instant record contains substantial evidence *711that during the period in question claimant was operating an electronic service and installation business and thus the board could properly find that he was engaged in self-employment and not totally unemployed (e.g., *Matter of Emanuel [Catherwood],*29 A D 2d 798; *Matter of Newman [Catherwood],*24 A D 2d 1042). “ The fact that this was merely a sideline while he was regularly employed or that it was sporadic and involved only a limited investment is not controlling. Nor is the fact that the endeavor was nonremunerative during the period for which benefits are claimed *(Matter of Bailey [Catherwood],*18 A D 2d 727) or claimant did not realize that his activities constituted employment *(Matter of Bunzl [Lubin],*1 A D 2d 46).” *(Matter of Carasso [Catherwood],*23 A D 2d 935, 936.) Similarly, the question of willful misrepresentation is factual and since there is substantial evidence to support the board’s determination it must be upheld (e.g., *Matter of Tiber [Catherwood],*31 A D 2d 704; *Matter of Tiano [Catherwood],*27 A D 2d 879). Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Cooke and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.
§ 7.6 Establishment of local administrative areas. ( a ) The Secretary, or the Secretary's designee, may designate local administrative areas within a county or a larger area under the jurisdiction of a county committee. ( 1 ) There will be a minimum of three local administrative areas in each county. In counties that have been combined or consolidated into a multiple county office, there will be 3 to 11 local administrative areas. In single-county offices, there will be three to five local administrative areas. With respect to Alaska and Puerto Rico, the county will be the area so designated by the State committees. In Louisiana, the term “county” applies to parishes.
( 2 ) Each local administrative area will have not more than one elected county committee member.
( 3 ) The boundaries of the local administrative areas will be determined by the State committee after considering recommendations by the county committee in which the local administrative areas are located.
( 4 ) The county committee must give public notice of the local administrative area boundaries in advance of the election and nomination processes.
( b ) [Reserved]
52.249-7 Termination (Fixed-Price ArchitectEngineer).

As prescribed in 49.503(b), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for architectengineer services when a fixed-price contract is contemplated:

Termination (Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer) (Apr 1984)

(a) The Government may terminate this contract in whole or, from time to time, in part, for the

Government’s convenience or because of the failure of the Contractor to fulfill the contract

obligations. The Contracting Officer shall terminate by delivering to the Contractor a Notice of

Termination specifying the nature, extent, and effective date of the termination. Upon receipt of the

notice, the Contractor shall-

(1) Immediately discontinue all services affected (unless the notice directs otherwise); and

(2) Deliver to the Contracting Officer all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates,

summaries, and other information and materials accumulated in performing this contract, whether

completed or in process.

(b) If the termination is for the convenience of the Government, the Contracting Officer shall make

an equitable adjustment in the contract price but shall allow no anticipated profit on unperformed

services.

(c) If the termination is for failure of the Contractor to fulfill the contract obligations, the

Government may complete the work by contract or otherwise and the Contractor shall be liable for

any additional cost incurred by the Government.

(d) If, after termination for failure to fulfill contract obligations, it is determined that the Contractor

had not failed, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the termination had

been issued for the convenience of the Government.

(e) The rights and remedies of the Government provided in this clause are in addition to any other

rights and remedies provided by law or under this contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.249 [Reserved]
# L_2014288EN.01000501.xml

| 2.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 288/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 288/5

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

of 30 September 2014

repealing Decision 2006/464/EC on provisional emergency measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Community of Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu

(notified under document C(2014) 6566)

(2014/690/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community (1), and in particular the fourth sentence of Article 16(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The measures set out by Commission Decision 2006/464/EC (2) did not prevent the spread of Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (oriental chestnut gall wasp) as appears from the yearly surveys carried out by the Member States pursuant to that Decision. Those surveys further show that Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu is widely spread in a large part of its potential area of establishment within the Union territory. In addition, the conditions for movement of susceptible plants set out in Decision 2006/464/EC are not feasible and appropriate for that large part of the Union territory. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The measures set out by Commission Decision 2006/464/EC (2) did not prevent the spread of Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (oriental chestnut gall wasp) as appears from the yearly surveys carried out by the Member States pursuant to that Decision. Those surveys further show that Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu is widely spread in a large part of its potential area of establishment within the Union territory. In addition, the conditions for movement of susceptible plants set out in Decision 2006/464/EC are not feasible and appropriate for that large part of the Union territory.

| (2) | Decision 2006/464/EC should therefore be repealed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Decision 2006/464/EC should therefore be repealed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plant Health, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plant Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 2006/464/EC is repealed.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2014.

For the Commission

Tonio BORG

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1.

1

(2)  Commission Decision 2006/464/EC of 27 June 2006 on provisional emergency measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Community of Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (OJ L 183, 5.7.2006, p. 29).

2

Dryocosmus kuriphilus

---
§ 760.1311 Death, incompetence, or disappearance. ( a ) In the case of the death, incompetency, or disappearance of a person or the dissolution of an entity that is eligible to receive benefits in accordance with this subpart, such alternate person or persons specified in 7 CFR part 707 may receive such benefits, as determined appropriate by FSA.
( b ) Payments may be made to an otherwise eligible dairy producer who is now deceased or to a dissolved entity if a representative who currently has authority to enter into an application for the producer or the producer's estate makes the request for benefits as specified in § 760.1303. Proof of authority over the deceased producer's estate or a dissolved entity must be provided.
( c ) If a dairy producer is now a dissolved general partnership or joint venture, all members of the general partnership or joint venture at the time of dissolution or their duly authorized representatives must be identified in the request for benefits.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2009 

p1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2009 

139041 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139041 

 COA: 282222 

Oakland CC: 2007-215014-FH 

TAMIR TAUHEED BELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

KEONA S. BERG,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:21-cv-6-TKW-MJF

DAVID MADDOX, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 32). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed based on 

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with court orders. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the case file.

DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of April, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:21-cv-00006-TKW-MJF Document 33 Filed 04/05/21 Page 1 of 1
§ 634.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this part is for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), with the concurrence of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), to set forth regulations to carry out a Rural Clean Water Program (RCWP) under section 35, Pub. L. 95-217; 91 Stat. 1579; 33 U.S.C. 1288.
( b ) The Rural Clean Water Program provides financial and technical assistance to private landowners and operators (participants) having control of rural land. The assistance is provided through long-term contracts (5 to 10 years) to install best management practices (BMP's) in project areas which have critical water quality problems resulting from agricultural activities. The proposed project area must be within a high priority area in an approved agricultural portion of a 208 water quality management plan. Participation in RCWP is voluntary.
( c ) The program is a new USDA program and an extension of existing water-quality management programs of EPA.
52.242-16 [Reserved]

Parent topic: 52.242 [Reserved]
**30 Minute Users Guide To The Internet******
**TABLE OF CONTENTS**
****Using the Internet User Guide****The 30 Minute Guide to Internet****How Does the Internet Work?****Understanding the World Wide Web (WWW)****What is a Browser and How Does it Work?****Using Netscape!!!****Why is an Internet Address Important****Sending E-Mail and Linking to International Users****How to Link to Hypertext and Hypermedia Documents on the WWW...****What is a "HOME PAGE" and Why is it Important?****How to Understand WWWAddresses...****Ways to Connnect to the Internet****What is TCP/IP and Why is it Important?****Ways to Find What You Need Once You Know What You Are Looking For!****What is the Usenet and How Does it Work?****How to Locate Types of Information Contained on the Internet and Usenet****Glossary of Terms****Internet Reference Guides****
§ 766.205 Shared Appreciation Payment Agreement rates and terms. ( a ) The interest rate for Shared Appreciation Payment Agreements is the Agency's SA amortization rate.
( b ) The term of the Shared Appreciation Payment Agreement is based on the borrower's repayment ability and the useful life of the security. The term will not exceed 25 years.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>           5

<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Prudential-Bache/Watson & 
                    Taylor, Ltd. 3 and is qualified in its 
                    entirety by reference to such financial
                    statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          

<CIK>               0000759726
<NAME>              Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd. 3
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Sep-30-1996

<PERIOD-START>                  Oct-01-1995

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1995

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS

<CASH>                          1,204,097

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   3,611

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0

<PP&E>                          11,591,623

<DEPRECIATION>                  4,839,919

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  12,799,331

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           622,172

<BONDS>                         638,000

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      0

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    12,799,331

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                505,905

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                491,656

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              11,740

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 14,249

<INCOME-TAX>                    14,249

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    14,249

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .07

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berkshire Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Steven Rosenberg as Chief Executive Officer. President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                              /s/ Steven Rosenberg
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Steven Rosenberg,
                                              Chief Executive Officer, President
                                              and Chief Financial Officer

                                              May 12, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Berkshire Bancorp Inc. and will be retained by Berkshire
Bancorp Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.




                                     29
COURTROOM DEPUTY’S MINUTES DATE: March 7, 2007 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA DIGITAL RECORDING: 10:51 - 11:18

/ARRAIGNMENT CHANGE OF PLEA  CONSENT PLEA

 RULE 44(c) HEARING  SENTENCING

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE: Susan Russ Walker DEPUTY CLERK: Joyce Taylor

CASE NUMBER: 2:06cr169-WKW DEFENDANT NAME: William Earl Ulmer

AUSA: Clark Morris DEFENDANT ATTORNEY: Timothy Halstrom

Type counsel ( )Waived; ( )Retained; ( / )CJA; ( )FPD

( ) appointed at arraignment; ( ) standing in for: _______________

PTSO/USPO:

Interpreter present? ( / )NO; ( )YES Name:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/This is defendant’s FIRST APPEARANCE.

/Financial Affidavit executed. ORAL MOTION for appointment of Counsel.

/ORAL ORDER appointing CJA Panel Attorney. Notice of Appearance to be filed.

 WAIVER OF INDICTMENT executed and filed.

 INFORMATION filed.

 Juvenile Information filed w/Certificate that State Court refused jurisdiction.

PLEA: /Not Guilty

 Guilty as to:

 Count(s):

 Count(s):  dismissed on oral motion of USA

 to be dismissed at sentencing

 Written plea agreement filed  ORDERED SEALED

 ORAL ORDER Accepting Guilty Plea and Adjudicating Defendant Guilty as to Counts _________.

/CRIMINAL TERM: 6/4/07 

 DISCOVERY DISCLOSURE DATE: 3/7/07

 ORDER: Defendant continued under  same bond;  summons; for:

 Trial on ____________;  Sentencing on ____________

/Defendant remanded to custody of U. S. Marshal for:

 Trial on ________________; or  Sentencing on ______________

 Rule 44 Hearing:  Waiver of Conflict of Interest Form executed

 Defendant requests time to secure new counsel

Defendant’s ORAL WAIVER of any detention hearing.

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 111 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2713 

To temporarily suspend the duty on certain reception apparatus. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mrs. LINCOLN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To temporarily suspend the duty on certain reception 

apparatus. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN RECEPTION APPARATUS NOT CON4 TAINING A CLOCK OR CLOCK TIMER, INCOR5 PORATING FM OR AM/FM RADIO ONLY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 2713 IS 

‘‘ 9902.85.28 Reception apparatus for 

radiotelephony, radiotelegraphy or radio 

broacdasting, not containing 

a clock or clock timer, incorporating fm or am/fm radio 

only (provided for in subheading 8527.19.50) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jerome C. (Anonymous), Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered July 1, 1968, which adjudged appellant a youthful offender, after ~a nonjury trial to which he had consented, and imposed sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and ease remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for a new trial before a jury. The findings of fact are affirmed. With respect to appellant’s prime claim of error, we hold that the statutory requirement of consent to a trial without a jury for eligibility for youthful offender treatment (Code Crim. Pro., § 913-g, subd. 3; § 913-h) is unconstitutional *(People*v. *Michael A. C.*[Anonymous], 32 A D 2d 554). With respect to appellant’s additional claim of error, we hold that a “ pre-indictment ” lineup procedure constitutes a critical stage of the criminal prosecution, at which the defendant is ordinarily entitled to the aid of counsel *(United States*v. *Wade,*388 U. S. 218, 231-234; *Stovall*v. *Denno,*388 U. S. 293, 298; *Gilbert*v. *California,*388 U. S. 263, 272-274). However, where, as at bar, the testimony concerning lineup identification was surplusage, in light of the clear and convincing in-eourt identification of appellant, the error may be disregarded under section 542 of the Code of Criminal" Procedure *(People*v. *Baskerville,*32 A D 2d 555). Rabin, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuseello and ¡Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Christian Storch, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Altra Industrial Motion Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2018; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

 

|        |        |                                                        |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
|   |   |                                                   |
|   |   |                                                   |
| By:    |   | /s/ Christian Storch                                   |
|   |   | Name: Christian Storch                            |
|   |   | Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

Date: July 2, 2019
#### § 600.5 Area offices.

Each area office is under the direction and supervision of an area conservationist or assistant State conservationist for field operations who is responsible for NRCS activities in the geographical area served by the area office. Usually the geographical area includes multiple field offices and counties. Many area offices now consist of teams working on a watershed or other geopolitical basis.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL ANTHONY LAPAGLIA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 158 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.