alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 769.166 Transfers and assumptions. ( a ) All transfers and assumptions must be approved in advance by the Agency. The assuming entity must meet all eligibility criteria for HPRP.
( b ) Available transfer and assumption options to eligible intermediaries include: ( 1 ) The total indebtedness may be transferred to another eligible intermediary on the same rates and terms; or
( 2 ) The total indebtedness may be transferred to another eligible intermediary on different terms not to exceed the term for which an initial loan can be made.
( c ) The transferor must prepare the transfer document for the Agency's review prior to the transfer and assumption.
( d ) The transferee must provide the Agency with information required in the application as specified in § 769.158.
( e ) The Agency's approved form of the assumption agreement will formally authorize the transfer and assumption and will contain the Agency case number of the transferor and transferee.
( f ) When the transferee makes a cash down-payment in connection with the transfer and assumption, any proceeds received by the transferor will be credited on the transferor's loan debt in order of maturity date.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:01-cr-34-SPM

MARIO TORENZA BETSEY,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER TERMINATING SUPERVISED RELEASE

This cause comes for consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Terminate

Supervised Release (doc. 39). Defendant has served three years of the five

year term of supervised release to which he was sentenced. The probation office

supports the Defendant’s request. The Court finds that early termination is

warranted by the conduct of Defendant and in the interest of justice. 18 U.S.C. §

3583(e); Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(c)(2)(B). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s Motion for Early

Termination of Supervised Release (doc. 39) is granted. Defendant’s term of

supervised release is terminated and Defendant is discharged.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-second day of June, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
#### § 66.6 List of bioengineered foods.

The List of Bioengineered Foods consists of the following: Alfalfa, apple (ArcticTM varieties), canola, corn, cotton, eggplant (BARI Bt Begun varieties), papaya (ringspot virus-resistant varieties), pineapple (pink flesh varieties), potato, salmon (AquAdvantage®), soybean, squash (summer, coat protein-mediated virus-resistant varieties), sugarbeet, and sugarcane (Bt insect-resistant varieties).

[88 FR 83311, Nov. 29, 2023]
#### § 768.2 [Reserved]
2006-0763.

#### Davis v. Jeffreys.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Timothy A. Davis. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT A

Case 4:20-cv-00524-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 11/03/20 Page 1 of 11
EXHIBIT A

Case 4:20-cv-00524-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 11/03/20 Page 2 of 11
EXHIBIT A

Case 4:20-cv-00524-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 11/03/20 Page 3 of 11
EXHIBIT A

Case 4:20-cv-00524-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 11/03/20 Page 4 of 11
EXHIBIT A

Case 4:20-cv-00524-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 11/03/20 Page 5 of 11
EXHIBIT A

Case 4:20-cv-00524-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 11/03/20 Page 6 of 11
EXHIBIT A

Case 4:20-cv-00524-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 11/03/20 Page 7 of 11
EXHIBIT A

Case 4:20-cv-00524-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 11/03/20 Page 8 of 11
EXHIBIT A

Case 4:20-cv-00524-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 11/03/20 Page 9 of 11
EXHIBIT A

Case 4:20-cv-00524-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 11/03/20 Page 10 of 11
EXHIBIT A

Case 4:20-cv-00524-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 11/03/20 Page 11 of 11
§ 70.37 Types of Service. ( a ) *Noncontinuous grading service.* Service is performed on an unscheduled basis, with no scheduled tour of duty, and when an applicant requests grading of a particular lot of poultry or rabbit product. Charges or fees are based on the time, travel, and expenses needed to perform the work. This service may be referred to as unscheduled grading service. Poultry and rabbit products graded under unscheduled grading service are not eligible to be identified with the official grademarks shown in § 70.51.
( b ) *Continuous grading service on a scheduled basis.* Service on a scheduled basis has a scheduled tour of duty and is performed when an applicant requests that a USDA licensed grader be stationed in the applicant's plant or warehouse and grade poultry and rabbit products in accordance with U.S. Standards. The applicant agrees to comply with the facility, operating, and sanitary requirements of scheduled service. Minimum fees for service performed under a scheduled agreement shall be based on the hours of the regular tour of duty. Poultry and rabbit products graded under scheduled grading service are eligible to be identified with the official grademarks shown in § 70.51 only when processed and graded under the supervision of a grader.
( c ) *Temporary grading service.* Service is performed when an applicant requests an official plant number with service provided on an unscheduled basis. The applicant must meet facility, operating, and sanitary requirements of continuous service. Charges or fees are based on the time and expenses needed to perform the work. Poultry and rabbit products graded under temporary grading service are eligible to be identified with the official grademarks only when they are processed and graded under the supervision of a grader.
[84 FR 49643, Sept. 23, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INCOME
STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                           2,506
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,080
<INVENTORY>                                     58,347
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,163
<PP&E>                                         302,926
<DEPRECIATION>                                 105,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 331,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,188
<BONDS>                                        128,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,396
<OTHER-SE>                                     124,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   331,202
<SALES>                                        122,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,166
<CGS>                                           84,733
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   175
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,027
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,025
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,002
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,002
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28


</TABLE>
<PAGE>



FIRST CENTRAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES                  Exhibit 11

COMPUTATION OF PER COMMON SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,

                                                           1997           1996         1995
                                                           ----           ----         ----
<S>                                                     <C>            <C>          <C>
PRIMARY

 Net income applicable to common shares                 ($9,032,491)   $1,016,698   $3,289,676
                                                        ===========    ==========   ==========
 Weighted average number of primary common shares:
  Outstanding                                             5,986,608     5,988,327    5,966,425
  Issuable upon assumed exercise of dilutive warrants             0        30,808       52,909
                                                        -----------    ----------   ----------
     TOTAL                                                5,986,608     6,019,135    6,019,334
                                                        ===========    ==========   ==========

Primary earnings per common share                         ($1.51)        $0.169       $0.547
                                                          =======        ======       ======


FULLY DILUTED
 Net income applicable to common shares                 ($9,032,491)   $1,016,698   $3,289,676
 Add interest and amortization of debentures
  (net of tax)                                              145,530       183,051      194,436
                                                        -----------    ----------   ----------
     TOTAL                                              ($8,886,961)   $1,199,749   $3,484,112
                                                        ===========    ==========   ==========
 Weighted average number of primary common shares:
  Outstanding                                             5,986,608     5,988,327    5,966,425
  Increase to assumed exercise of stock options and
   conversion of convertible debt to reflect maximum
   dilution effect                                          653,333       778,197      955,728
                                                        -----------    ----------   ----------
     TOTAL                                                6,639,941     6,766,524    6,922,153
                                                        ===========    ==========   ==========


 Fully diluted earnings per common share                  ($1.51)        $0.169       $0.503
                                                          =======        ======       ======
</TABLE>

<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40515

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROLANDO OYEVIDES-JIMENEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-02-CR-800-1

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Rolando Oyevides-Jimenez appeals his guilty-plea conviction

for illegal reentry into the United States following an

aggravated felony conviction in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

For the first time on appeal, Oyevides-Jimenez argues that the

sentencing provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) & (2) are

unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s holding in

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).
No. 03-40515

-2-

Oyevides-Jimenez acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve

the issue for Supreme Court review. Apprendi did not overrule

Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90; United

States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). OyevidesJimenez’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 6-3 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 6-3 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 6-3 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 3 of 3
Presidential House - Second Amendment



Exhibit 10.17

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE CONTRACT

           
Second Amendment to Purchase and Sale Contract (this “Amendment”) is made
as of May 8, 2009, between DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES II
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (“Seller”) and ADVENIR, INC.
(“Purchaser”).

W I T N E S S E T H:

           
WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser entered into a Purchase and Sale Contract
dated as of March 25, 2009 (as amended, the “Agreement”) with respect to
the sale of certain property known as Presidential House located in Miami-Dade
County, Florida, as described in the Agreement; and

           
WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser desire to amend the Agreement on the terms
set forth herein. 

           
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein
contained, the sum of $10.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the
mutual receipt and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereby agree as follows:

1.     
Capitalized Terms.     Capitalized terms used
in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement, except
as expressly otherwise defined herein.

2.     
Feasibility Period.      The Feasibility
Period, set forth in Section 3.1 of the Agreement, is hereby extended to 5:00
[EST] on May 13, 2009.

3.     
Miscellaneous.          
This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute a
single instrument and may be delivered by facsimile transmission, and any such
facsimile transmitted Amendment shall have the same force and effect, and be as
binding, as if original signatures had been delivered.  As modified hereby,
all the terms of the Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall
continue in full force and effect.

[Signature Page to Follow]


           
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the date and year hereinabove written.

 

Seller:

 

DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT REAL ESTATE
ASSOCIATES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a New York limited partnership

 

By: 
DBL PROPERTIES CORPORATION, a New York corporation, its general partner

 

By: 
/s/Brian J. Bornhorst

Name: 
Brian J. Bornhorst

Title: 
Vice President

Purchaser:

ADVENIR, INC.,
a
Florida corporation 

By: 
/s/Stephen L. Vecchitto

Name:
Stephen L. Vecchitto

Title: 
President
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                           2005 MBO'S - ROBERT DONAHUE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GOAL                                                        COMPLETION DATE        POINTS
----                                                        ---------------        ------
<S>                                                         <C>                    <C>
**                                                          2005                     10

*                                                           2005                     10

**                                                          2005                     10

Complete independent third party customer satisfaction
survey for TDS and A.Net by end of June 2005.
Complete second survey by end of December 2005.             End of June 2005         10
Report results to BOD.                                      End of Dec 2005

Sustain SOX compliance                                      Ongoing - Audit Chair    15
                                                            Evaluates

*                                                                                    10

*                                                                                    10

Succession Management/Management Development -
Review high potential list with BOD. Cover mentoring and
coaching executive staff.                                   September 2005           10

**                                                                                   5

*                                                                                    10

                                                                          TOTAL     100
</TABLE>

*   Confidential Strategic MBO

**  Confidential Financial MBO
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RONALD SINGLETON,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:03cv581/MCR/EMT

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated May 9, 2006. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and

recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any

timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion For Attorney Fees And Costs (Doc. 22) is granted as follows:

Plaintiff’s counsel, Deborah Cooper Horimoto, Esquire, is entitled to recover

fees and expenses in the amount of $3,353.45 for representing Plaintiff

before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (EAJA); the amount of attorney fees requested

under the EAJA is reasonable; and the Commissioner is directed to pay

counsel that amount. Costs in the amount of $150.00 are also awarded, to

be paid from the Judgment Fund of the United States Treasury.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2006.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-00581-MCR-EMT Document 27 Filed 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFONORTHPORT NETWOTK SYSTEMS,
INCORPORATEDFORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the CFO of Northport Network Systems, Inc., a Washington
corporation (the Company). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 and filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (Form 10-K).

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that the Form
10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 15, 2010

| | BY: | /s/
      James Wang
| | --- | --------------------
| |     | James Wang          
| |     | CFO                 

---
### Distribution and mass loss of volatile organic compounds in the surficial aquifer at sites FT03, LF13, and WP14/LF15, Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, November 2000–February 2001

By: Jeffrey R. Barbaro**Pradumna P. Neupane

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wri024121

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Van McIntyre, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 21, 1966, which denied, without a hearing, his motion in the nature of a writ of error *coram nobis*to vacate a judgment of said "court rendered May 5, 1965, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon a guilty plea, and imposing sentence. Appeal dismissed as academic. ■Subsequent to the entry of the order,, and on June 24, 1968, the said judgment was vacated in another proceeding and defendant was resentenced *nunc pro tune*as of May 5, 1965, thus superseding the original judgment.- The superseding judgment is now the subject of a pending appeal. However, we have considered the merits of the appeal and if it were not being dismissed, we would affirm the order for lack of merit to the appeal. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### § 58.932 Milk.

The raw milk shall meet the requirements as outlined in §§ 58.132 through 58.138. Unless processed within two hours after being received, it shall be cooled to, and held at a temperature of 45 °F or lower until processed.