alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
52.247-53 Freight Classification Description.

As prescribed in 47.305-9(b)(1), insert the following provision in solicitations when the supplies

being acquired are new to the supply system, nonstandard, or modifications of previously shipped

items, and different freight classifications may apply:

Freight Classification Description (Apr 1984)

Offerors are requested to indicate below the full Uniform Freight Classification (rail) description, or

the National Motor Freight Classification description applicable to the supplies, the same as offeror

uses for commercial shipment. This description should include the packing of the commodity (box,

crate, bundle, loose, setup, knocked down, compressed, unwrapped, etc.), the container material

(fiberboard, wooden, etc.), unusual shipping dimensions, and other conditions affecting traffic

descriptions. The Government will use these descriptions as well as other information available to

determine the classification description most appropriate and advantageous to the Government.

Offeror understands that shipments on any f.o.b. origin contract awarded, as a result of this

solicitation, will be made in conformity with the shipping classification description specified by the

Government, which may be different from the classification description furnished below.

For Freight Classification Purposes, Offeror Describes This Commodity as ___________.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **OF
BNL FINANCIAL CORPORATION**
 **PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**
 
 
 In
connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March
31, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Wayne E. Ahart, Chief Executive Officer of BNL
Financial Corporation, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
    The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 _______________________
 Wayne E.
Ahart
 Chief
Executive Officer
 May 13,
2005
23.902 Policy.

(a) Agencies shall implement environmental management systems (EMS) at all appropriate

organizational levels. Where contractor activities affect an agency’s environmental management

aspects, EMS requirements shall be included in contracts to ensure proper implementation and

execution of EMS roles and responsibilities.

(b) The contracting officer shall-

(1) Specify the EMS directives with which the contractor must comply; and

(2) Ensure contractor compliance to the same extent as the agency would be required to comply, if

the agency operated the facilities or vehicles.

Parent topic: Subpart 23.9 - Contractor Compliance with Environmental Management Systems
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in theevent that publications are no longer available from the original publishingagency site. (Historical purposes)

**Title:** Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge [electronicresource] : draft comprehensive conservation plan andenvironmental impact statement, [Thurston and Pierce Counties, Washington]

 
DraftComprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Appendices

 
SuDoc Number: I 49.108:N 63/CD
Item Number: 0600-D-02 (online)
CGP system Number: 000550385
#### § 760.21 Application for payments by manufacturers.

The affected manufacturer, or his legal representatives, shall file an application for payment with the Deputy Administrator, FSA, Washington, D.C., through the county office serving the county where the contaminated product is located. The application for payment may be in the form of a letter or memorandum. Such letter or memorandum, however, must be accompanied by acceptable documentation to support such application for payment.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 27, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00563

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF G.V.S., ET AL CHILDREN

,

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Te xas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 01818

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal from a trial court’s order terminating appellant mother’s

parental rights. Appellant mother’s brief was due September 24, 2018. On the due date,

appellant mother filed a motion for extension of time asking for an additional twenty days in

which to file her brief. After review, we GRANT appellant mother’s motion and ORDER

appell ant mother to file her brief in this court on or before October 15, 2018.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of S eptember, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Cle rk of Court
#### Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company et al., Appellants-Respondents.

[816 NYS2d 17]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.) entered October 28, 2005, which, in an action under an all risk policy to recover lost business income, expenses incurred in reducing the loss of business income, and expenses incurred in adjusting the claim, inter alia, granted defendants insurers’ motion for summary judgment to the extent of dismissing so much of the loss adjustment claim as seeks to recover attorneys’ fees incurred in litigating this action, and granted plaintiffs cross motion to dismiss various of defendants’ affirmative defenses, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the defense of loss in progress, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly found an issue of fact as to whether plaintiffs closing of its store was necessitated by the physical damage to the store caused by the December 6, 1996 rockslide, in which event lost business income would be covered, or was made out of concern for the safety of the store and its occupants raised by the risk of future rockslides, in which event there would not be coverage *(cf. Cytopath Biopsy Lab. v United States Fid. & Guar. Co.,*6 AD3d 300 [2004]). We reject defendants’ argument that plaintiff’s affidavits in opposition were tailored to avoid the consequences of sworn testimony and documents to the effect that while repairs should not be undertaken until the adjacent hillside was stabilized, they were nevertheless feasible, and note contemporaneous correspondence claiming serious damage to the structural integrity of the rear wall and roof. Defendants’ nonfortuity and known loss affirmative defenses, assuming their viability independently of the policies and Insurance Law, were properly dismissed upon a finding that the December 6, 1996 rockslide, while a known risk at the time the policies took effect, was not “substantially certain to occur” *(see National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v Stroh Cos., Inc.,*265 F3d 97,106 [2d Cir 2001], quoting Ostrager and Newman, Insurance Coverage Disputes § 8.02, at 248 [5th ed 1991]). We modify to dismiss as well the loss in progress defense, a close variant of the known loss defense *(see Inland Waters Pollution Control, Inc. v National Union Fire Ins. Co.,*
      *316997 F2d 172, 177 [1993]), apparently overlooked by the motion court. Defendants’ obligation to reimburse plaintiff for attorneys’ fees incurred in litigating its claims under the policies is not “unmistakably clear” from the relied-upon loss adjustment expenses clause, and, accordingly, the claim therefor was properly dismissed *(see Hooper Assoc, v AGS Computers,*74 NY2d 487, 492 [1989]). We have considered the parties’ remaining contentions for affirmative relief and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Marlow and Malone, JJ.
APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2005-0276.

#### State v. Ayers.

Cuyahoga App. No. 86006, 2005-Ohio-6972. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2005-2336, *State v. Buehler,*Cuyahoga App. No. 85796, 2005-Ohio-5717; and briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MURRAY HILTON,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:03cv166/MCR/WCS

FRANK McHUGH, 

and SEYMOUR GOSS, M.D.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated September 28, 2005. The Plaintiff has previously been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made a de

novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should

be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 5:03-cv-00166-MCR-WCS Document 167 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:03cv166/MCR/WCS

2. The findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the report and

recommendation are hereby adopted and the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of

Defendants.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of October, 2005.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:03-cv-00166-MCR-WCS Document 167 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATIONS OF
NORTHPORT NETWORK SYSTEMS, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with Northport Network Systems, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 4, 2011 BY:/s/ Yan ZhaoYan ZhaoChief Executive OfficerBY:/s/ Jim Howell QianJim Howell QianChief Financial Officer
#### § 63.503 Separability.

If any provision of the part is declared invalid or the applicability thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this subpart, or the applicability thereof to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
TS-G050GW Attachment 2-1/1 CBI CBI CBI
§ 51.1819 U.S. No. 3. “U.S. No. 3” consists of tangerines which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Mature;
( 2 ) Not flabby; and
( 3 ) Not seriously lumpy.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Decay;
( 2 ) Unhealed skin breaks; and
( 3 ) Wormy fruit.
( c ) Free from very serious damage caused by: ( 1 ) Ammoniation;
( 2 ) Bruises;
( 3 ) Caked melanose;
( 4 ) Creasing;
( 5 ) Dirt or other foreign material;
( 6 ) Disease;
( 7 ) Dryness or mushy condition;
( 8 ) Hail;
( 9 ) Insects;
( 10 ) Scab;
( 11 ) Scale;
( 12 ) Scars;
( 13 ) Skin breakdown;
( 14 ) Sprayburn;
( 15 ) Sunburn; and,
( 16 ) Other means.
( d ) For tolerances see § 51.1820.
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
              RFMSI SERIES 2006-S8 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
September 1, 2006,  and the Standard  Terms of Pooling and Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of September 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),
among Residential Funding Mortgage  Securities I, Inc., as company,  Residential
Funding  Company,  LLC (formerly  Residential  Funding  Corporation),  as master
servicer,  and U.S. Bank National  Association,  as trustee, does hereby certify
that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2756 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2756

  To authorize the President to utilize Federal equipment, supplies, 
   facilities, personnel, and other non-monetary resources to assist 
utility companies that contribute to recovery efforts from the effects 
                          of a major disaster.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 2006

  Ms. Collins introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the President to utilize Federal equipment, supplies, 
   facilities, personnel, and other non-monetary resources to assist 
utility companies that contribute to recovery efforts from the effects 
                          of a major disaster.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UTILITY COMPANY DISASTER ASSISTANCE.

    Title IV of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:

``SEC. 425. UTILITY COMPANIES.

    ``(a) Definition.--In this section, the term `qualified utility 
company' means an entity that--
            ``(1) provides--
                    ``(A) telecommunications service;
                    ``(B) electrical power;
                    ``(C) natural gas;
                    ``(D) water and sewer services; or
                    ``(E) any other essential service, as determined by 
                the President;
            ``(2) is a private, for-profit entity; and
            ``(3) is contributing to efforts to recover from the 
        effects of a major disaster.
    ``(b) Authorization.--In a major disaster, the President may 
utilize Federal equipment, supplies, facilities, personnel, and other 
non-monetary resources to assist a qualified utility company, in 
exchange for reasonable compensation.
    ``(c) Compensation.--
            ``(1) In general.--The President shall, by regulation, 
        establish a mechanism to set reasonable compensation for the 
        provision of assistance under subsection (b).
            ``(2) Criteria.--The mechanism established under paragraph 
        (1)--
                    ``(A) shall reflect fair market value for the 
                assistance provided under subsection (b) in setting 
                compensation;
                    ``(B) shall have streamlined procedures for 
                determining compensation; and
                    ``(C) is not required to set compensation based on 
                the costs to the Federal Government.''.
                                 <all>
```
Served: October 12, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 12th of October, 2011

Ninety-day Notice of Mesaba Aviation, 

Inc., Pinnacle Airlines, Inc., and SkyWest 

Airlines, Inc., to terminate service at: 

Muscle Shoals/Florence/Sheffield/

 Tuscumbia, Alabama

Fort Dodge, Iowa

Mason City, Iowa

Sioux City, Iowa

Waterloo, Iowa

Alpena, Michigan

Escanaba, Michigan

Iron Mountain/Kingsford, Michigan

Pellston, Michigan

Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan

Bemidji, Minnesota

Brainerd, Minnesota

Chisholm/Hibbing, Minnesota

International Falls, Minnesota

Thief River Falls, Minnesota

Greenville, Mississippi

Laurel/Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Tupelo, Mississippi

Butte, Montana

Devils Lake, North Dakota

Jamestown, North Dakota

Aberdeen, South Dakota

Watertown, South Dakota

under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq. 

Docket DOT-OST-2000-7856 

Docket DOT-OST-2001-10682

Docket DOT-OST-2001-10684 

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0131

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0132

Docket DOT-OST-2009-0300

Docket DOT-OST-2003-15128

Docket DOT-OST-1999-5175

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0133

Docket DOT-OST-2009-0303

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0134

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0135

Docket DOT-OST-2003-15796 

Docket DOT-OST-2009-0304

Docket DOT-OST-2001-10642

Docket DOT-OST-2008-0209

Docket DOT-OST-2001-10685

Docket DOT-OST-2009-0305

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0136

Docket DOT-OST-1997-2785

Docket DOT-OST-1997-2785

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0137

Docket DOT-OST-2001-10644

NOTICE OF EXTENSION
By Order 2011-9-5 the Department requested proposals at the twenty-three communities

shown, with proposals due no later than October 12. By email dated October 11, Air 

Choice One requested an extension until October 14. Another carrier orally requested an 

extension for the same period.

We have decided to grant the carriers’ requests, as the additional amount of time is not 

unreasonable. All parties must now file competitive proposals for the twenty-three 

communities listed above no later than October 14, 2011. 

Dennis DeVany, Chief,

EAS and Domestic Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.gov
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**338 CA 14-01305**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THOMAS J. TUDISCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAWNMARIE MINCER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

BECKERMAN AND BECKERMAN, LLP, ROCHESTER (STEVEN M. BECKERMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BARRETT GREISBERGER, LLP, WEBSTER (MARK M. GREISBERGER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered September 30, 2013. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted in part the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and dismissed the third and fourth causes of action.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied and the complaint is reinstated in its entirety.
Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking to enforce an alleged oral agreement concerning the purchase of residential property. Several months after defendant filed an answer, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) and CPLR 3212 on the ground that the alleged agreement was not enforceable because of the statute of frauds ( see General Obligations Law § 5-703 [1]). Supreme Court granted defendant’s motion in part and dismissed the third and fourth causes of action. Plaintiff contends that defendant’s motion should have been treated as a CPLR 3212 motion for summary judgment. We agree with that contention. The parties’ course of litigation shows that they were “deliberately charting a summary judgment course” and treated the motion as a CPLR 3212 motion for summary judgment ( Nowacki v Becker , 71 AD3d 1496, 1497 [4th Dept 2010]).
We agree with plaintiff that the court erred in granting defendant’s motion in part. “The failure of [defendant] to support [her] motion with a copy of the pleadings requires denial of the motion, regardless of the merits of the motion” ( D.J. Enters. of WNY v Benderson , 294 AD2d 825, 825; see CPLR 3212 [b]; Notaro v Bison Constr. Corp. , 32 AD3d 1218, 1219). In light of our determination, we**-2- 338 CA 14-01305** 
do not address plaintiff’s remaining contentions.

Entered: March 27, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**EXHIBIT 35.3**

** **[COUNTRYWIDEHOME LOANS LOGO] 400 Countrywide WaySimi Valley, California 93065-6298

February 28, 2007

 

[ADDRESSEE]

  

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

I, Joseph Candelario, hereby certify that I am an officer of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (the “Servicer”).  Ifurther certify, with respect to the applicable servicing agreement relating to the securitization transaction(s) set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Servicing Agreement”) that:

(a)        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Servicerunder the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(b)        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such year.

\s\  JosephCandelario                                       *February 28,2007*Joseph CandelarioFirst Vice PresidentCompliance OfficerLoan Administration

 

----

**Exhibit A**

**Securitization Transaction(s)**

**WMALT 2006-AR1WMALT 2006-AR4WMALT 2006-AR5WMALT 2006-AR7WMALT 2006-AR8WMALT 2006-AR9**

** **