alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Sujal Patel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K of Isilon Systems, Inc. for the year ended December 30,
      2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
      Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
      condition and results of operations of Isilon Systems, Inc.





Dated:
                April 2, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                SUJAL PATELName:
            Sujal
                PatelTitle:
            President,
                Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal
                Executive Officer)
#### § 785.2 Definitions.

*Administrator* means the Administrator, FSA, or authorized designee.

*Certified Mediation Program* means a program providing mediation services that has been certified in accordance with § 785.3.

*Confidential mediation* means a mediation process in which the mediator will not disclose to any person oral or written communications provided to the mediator in confidence, except as allowed by 5 U.S.C. 574 or § 785.9.

*Covered persons* means agricultural producers, their creditors (as applicable), persons directly affected by actions of the USDA, and any other persons involved in covered issues under § 785.4(d); for which mediation services are provided by a Certified Mediation Program.

*Fiscal year* means the period of time beginning October 1 of one year and ending September 30 of the next year and designated by the year in which it ends.

*FSA* means the Farm Service Agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or a successor agency.

*Mediation services* means all activities relating to the intake and scheduling of mediations; the provision of background and selected information regarding the mediation process; financial advisory and counseling services (as reasonable and necessary to prepare parties for mediation) performed by a person other than a Certified Mediation Program mediator; and mediation sessions in which a mediator assists disputing parties in voluntarily reaching mutually agreeable settlement of issues within the laws, regulations, and the agency's generally applicable program policies and procedures, but has no authoritative decision making power.

*Mediator* means a neutral individual who functions specifically to aid the parties in a dispute during a mediation process.

*Qualified mediator* means a mediator who meets the training requirements established by State law in the State in which mediation services will be provided or, where a State has no law prescribing mediator qualifications, an individual who has attended a minimum of 40 hours of core mediator knowledge and skills training and, to remain in a qualified mediator status, completes a minimum of 20 hours of additional training or education during each 2-year period. Such training or education must be approved by the USDA, by an accredited college or university, or by one of the following organizations: State Bar of a qualifying State, a State mediation association, a State approved mediation program, or a society of professionals in dispute resolution.

*Qualifying State* means a State with a Certified Mediation Program currently certified by FSA.

[67 FR 57315, Sept. 10, 2002, as amended at 87 FR 13125, Mar. 9, 2022]
§ 632.19 Crop history and allotments. ( a ) Most crop history and allotments on eligible lands were discontinued at the time of mining. However, if eligible lands are classified as cropland at the time the contract is signed, the cropland crop history and allotment, if any, may be: ( 1 ) Preserved for a period not to exceed twice the length of the contract as provided in 7 CFR part 719, or
( 2 ) Voluntarily surrendered by the land user.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _____________________________

JAMES PETTY, #124 252 *

Plaintiff, *

v. * 2:06-CV-639-WKW

 (WO)

RAY B. FINEDOR, et al., *

Defendants. *

 _____________________________

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the court for consideration is Defendant Hardy's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's

Claims and Objection to Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension to file his response to

Defendants' written reports. In support of his motion, Defendant Hardy maintains that

dismissal of the claims against him is appropriate due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with the

directives of the court, namely, timely filings. 

The court has read and considered Defendant Hardy's motion and concludes that the

motion is due to be denied as moot in light of the court's order entered January 5, 2007

granting Plaintiff's request for additional time to file his opposition.

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that Defendant

Hardy's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 24) be DENIED as moot.

It is further

ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the said

Recommendation on or before January 22, 2007. Any objections filed must specifically

Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 27 Filed 01/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

identify the findings in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which the party is

objecting. Frivolous, conclusive or general objections will not be considered by the District

Court. The parties are advised that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and,

therefore, it is not appealable.

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations in the

Magistrate Judge's report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the District

Court of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual

findings in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain

error or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5 Cir. 1982). See Stein th

v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11 Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of th

Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11 Cir. 1981) ( en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the th

decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on

September 30, 1981.

Done, this 9 day of January 2007. th

/s/ Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 27 Filed 01/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 661.1 General.

This part is issued in accordance with the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture at 7 CFR 1.1 through 1.16 implementing the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. The Secretary's regulations, as implemented by the regulations in this part, govern the availability to the public of records of the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the records for which the Natural Resources Conservation Service has custodial responsibility.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2878 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2878

    To suspend temporarily the duty on formulations of Prosulfuron.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on formulations of Prosulfuron.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FORMULATIONS OF PROSULFURON.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.11.64       Mixtures of        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Prosulfuron (1-(4-                                                 31/2009
                         methoxy-6-methyl-
                         1,3,5-triazin-2-
                         yl)-3-[2-(3,3,3-
                         trifluoropropyl)-
                         phenylsulfonyl]ur
                         ea) (CAS No.
                         94125-34-5) and
                         application
                         adjuvants
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3808.30.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 33 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 33 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 58.41 Fees for additional copies of certificates.

Additional copies of any inspection or grading certificates (including takeoff certificates), other than those provided for in § 58.20 may be supplied to any interested party upon payment of a fee based on time required to prepare such copies at the hourly rate specified in § 58.43.

[54 FR 15167, Apr. 17, 1989]
52.227-19 Commercial Computer Software

License.

As prescribed in 27.409(g), insert the following clause:

Commercial Computer Software License (Dec 2007)

(a) Notwithstanding any contrary provisions contained in the Contractor’s standard commercial

license or lease agreement, the Contractor agrees that the Government will have the rights that are

set forth in paragraph (b) of this clause to use, duplicate or disclose any commercial computer

software delivered under this contract. The terms and provisions of this contract shall comply with

Federal laws and the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

(b)

(1) The commercial computer software delivered under this contract may not be used, reproduced,

or disclosed by the Government except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this clause or as expressly

stated otherwise in this contract.

(2) The commercial computer software may be-

(i) Used or copied for use with the computer(s) for which it was acquired, including use at any

Government installation to which the computer(s) may be transferred;

(ii) Used or copied for use with a backup computer if any computer for which it was acquired is

inoperative;

(iii) Reproduced for safekeeping (archives) or backup purposes;

(iv) Modified, adapted, or combined with other computer software, provided that the modified,

adapted, or combined portions of the derivative software incorporating any of the delivered,

commercial computer software shall be subject to same restrictions set forth in this contract;

(v) Disclosed to and reproduced for use by support service Contractors or their subcontractors,

subject to the same restrictions set forth in this contract; and

(vi) Used or copied for use with a replacement computer.

(3) If the commercial computer software is otherwise available without disclosure restrictions, the

Contractor licenses it to the Government without disclosure restrictions.

(c) The Contractor shall affix a notice substantially as follows to any commercial computer software

delivered under this contract:

Notice-Notwithstanding any other lease or license agreement that may pertain to, or accompany the

delivery of, this computer software, the rights of the Government regarding its use, reproduction

and disclosure are as set forth in Government Contract No.___________________________.

(End of clause)
Parent topic: 52.227 [Reserved]
52.242-4 Certification of Final Indirect Costs.

As prescribed in 42.703-2(f), insert the following clause:

Certification of Final Indirect Costs (Jan 1997)

(a) The Contractor shall-

(1) Certify any proposal to establish or modify final indirect cost rates;

(2) Use the format in paragraph (c) of this clause to certify; and

(3) Have the certificate signed by an individual of the Contractor’s organization at a level no lower

than a vice president or chief financial officer of the business segment of the Contractor that submits

the proposal.

(b) Failure by the Contractor to submit a signed certificate, as described in this clause, may result in

final indirect costs at rates unilaterally established by the Contracting Officer.

(c) The certificate of final indirect costs shall read as follows:

Certificate of Final Indirect Costs

This is to certify that I have reviewed this proposal to establish final indirect cost rates and to the

best of my knowledge and belief:

1. All costs included in this proposal (identify proposal and date) to establish final indirect cost rates

for (identify period covered by rate) are allowable in accordance with the cost principles of the

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and its supplements applicable to the contracts to which the

final indirect cost rates will apply; and

2. This proposal does not include any costs which are expressly unallowable under applicable cost

principles of the FAR or its supplements.

Firm: _________________________________________

Signature: _____________________________________

Name of Certifying Official: ______________________

Title: _________________________________________

Date of Execution: ______________________________

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.242 [Reserved]
52.222-12 Contract Termination-Debarment.

As prescribed in 22.407(a), insert the following clause:

Contract Termination-Debarment (May 2014)

A breach of the contract clauses entitled Construction Wage Rate Requirements, Contract Work

Hours and Safety Standards-Overtime Compensation, Apprentices and Trainees, Payrolls and Basic

Records, Compliance with Copeland Act Requirements, Subcontracts (Labor Standards), Compliance

with Construction Wage Rate Requirements and Related Regulations, or Certification of Eligibility

may be grounds for termination of the contract, and for debarment as a Contractor and

subcontractor as provided in 29 CFR 5.12.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
§ 54.1014 Accessibility of equipment and utensils; access to establishments. ( a ) The applicant shall cause equipment and utensils to be made easily accessible for examination and to be so placed, with adequate illumination to facilitate evaluation for compliance. The applicant shall furnish or make available any necessary tools; such as boroscope, profilometer, disassembly tools, ladders, radius gauges, and the like; necessary to complete the evaluation.
( b ) Supervisors of USDA design review specialists responsible for maintaining uniformity and accuracy of service under the regulations shall have access to all parts of establishments covered by approved applications for service under the regulations, for the purpose of examining all equipment or utensils in the establishments which have been or are to be evaluated for compliance with standards or which bear any marks of compliance.
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-5 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-5 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-5 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-5 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-5 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-5 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-5 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-5 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-5 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 9 of 9
Case 3:04-cr-00007-MCR Document 66 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:04-cr-00007-MCR Document 66 Filed 12/21/05 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:04-cr-00007-MCR Document 66 Filed 12/21/05 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:04-cr-00007-MCR Document 66 Filed 12/21/05 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:04-cr-00007-MCR Document 66 Filed 12/21/05 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:04-cr-00007-MCR Document 66 Filed 12/21/05 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:04-cr-00007-MCR Document 66 Filed 12/21/05 Page 7 of 7
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv6008-LC-HTC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

NOEL OWENS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 3:20cv6008-LC-HTC

M V JOSEPH,

Respondent.

______________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on April 19, 2021

(ECF No. 12). Efforts have been made to furrnish the Petitioner a copy of the 

Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant 

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). All mail was returned marked 

undeliverable and unable to forward. No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined the 

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-06008-LC-HTC Document 15 Filed 08/05/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv6008-LC-HTC

2. The motion to dismiss the amended petition (ECF Doc. 10) is 

GRANTED, and the amended petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF Doc. 4) is 

DISMISSED.

3. The clerk of court is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of August, 2021.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-06008-LC-HTC Document 15 Filed 08/05/21 Page 2 of 2
P. 1


# OAR Box 1830 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 85 ) IV-C-5 1 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:55AM Sheet 85of 232P. 2 

# ^tr % 4 ? 

# KM* UNITED STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION AGENCY

< WASHINGTON , D.C. 20460 

### FE B 2 W

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N Honorabl e Ala n J . Dixo n Unite d State s Senat e Washington , D.c . 2051 0 Dea r Senato r Dixon : Than k yo u fo r passin g along th e comment s o f you r constituent s concernin g EPA' s proposa l t o requir e onboar d refuelin g emissio n control s an d propose d gasolin e volatilit y regulations . B e assure d tha t thes e comment s wil l b e considere d i n th e nex t phas e o f ou r rulemaking process . W e wil l als o b e placin g the mi n th e publi c docket s fo r th e rulemaking . Than k yo u agai n fo r you r concer n i n thi s matter . Sincerel yyours , ^"W l SIGNE D B Y RICHARDD . WILSO

N Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic eo f Mobil eSource s c c : Docke tA-87-1 1 Docke tA-85-2 1 Prepare dby : FormLetter:sal:1/28/88:AL88035 0 - ECTD , An nArbor , M

I

bcc : Regio n 0 5 Congressiona l Liaison/Quin n
§ 789.15 Extension of priority ratings. ( a ) A person must use rated orders as necessary with suppliers to obtain items or services needed to fill a rated order. The person must use the priority rating indicated on the customer's rated order, except as otherwise provided in this part or as directed by USDA.
( b ) The priority rating must be included as necessary on each successive order placed to obtain items or services needed to fill a customer's rated order. This continues from contractor to subcontractor to supplier throughout the entire procurement chain.
CAUSE NO. : 12–1 5 –000 6 8 –CR § IN THE TWELFTH COURT § § OF APPEALS DISTRICT § ANDREW WHITAKER

vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS § TYLER, TEXAS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS: COMES NOW, Andrew Whitaker , the Appellant, in the above–styled and numbered cause, and pursuant to Rule 10 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, files this motion requesting that the Court extend the time for filing the Appellant’s brief in this cause, and in support shows as follows: A. 1. The case is on appeal from the 420 th Judicial District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas. 2. The style and number of the case in the trial court is Cause Number F 1 521497 ; Cause Number F1421007; State of Texas vs. Andrew Whitaker ; Case Number: 12–1 5 –000 6 8 –CR

& 12--15--00069--CR ; Andrew Whitaker vs. The State of Texas. 3. The Appellant was charged by indictment with the Third degree felony offense of Evading Arrest

and the State Jail offense of UUMV. 4. Punishment was assessed at confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division for t hirteen ( 13 ) and two (2) years confinement. 5. The present deadline for filing the Appellant’s brief is due June 8, 2015. 6. The Appellant seeks an extension of time of 3 0 days until July 8, 2015

. 7. This is the Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief. B. This extension is not sought for the purpose of delaying this appeal, but for the following reasons: Appellant's attorney has been hospitalized with an unexpected complications from surgery CAUSE NO. 12--15--00069--CR ACCEPTED 12-15-00068-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 6/8/2015 4:22:31 PM CATHY LUSK CLERKand requires additional time to complete Appellant’s brief. C. On June 8 , 2015, by copy of this motion, Appellant’s counsel has advised, via copy of this motion, the Nacogdoches County District Attorney’s Office of this submission. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Counsel for the Appellant prays that the Court grant an extension of time to file until July 8, 2015 , for filing of Appellant’s brief. Respectfully submitted,

___________________________________ WINFRED A. SIMMONS, II 115 W. Shepherd Avenue Lufkin, Texas 7590 4 (936) 632-3242 (phone) (936) 632-4325 (fax) SBN 00794636 Attorney for Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this Motion for Extension of Time the file Appellant’s Brief was delivered via facsimile transfer/ hand delivery/ certified mail, to the Angelina County District Attorneys’s Office, 101 E. Main, Nacogdoches, Texas 75961.

____________________________________ Winfred A. Simmons, II
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06cr169-WKW

) 

WILLIAM EARL ULMER )

ORDER

Upon consideration of defendant's pro se motion (Doc. # 339), filed September 28, 2007,

and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is DENIED as moot.

DONE, this 1st day of October, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 350 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
§ 58.337 Official test methods. ( a ) *Chemical.* Chemical analyses except where otherwise prescribed herein, shall be made in accordance with the methods described in the latest edition of Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, published by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, the Official and Tentative Methods of the American Oil Chemists Society or any other methods giving equivalent results.
( b ) *Microbiological.* Microbiological determinations shall be made in accordance with the methods described or suggested in the latest edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, published by the American Public Health Association.