alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


Obagi Medical Products, Inc.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Obagi Medical Products, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Preston S. Romm, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Company NameDate: March 12, 2010
By:
/s/ Preston S. RommPreston S. RommChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### §§ 701.107-701.109 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Per Dyrvik, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of UBS Managed Futures LLC
(Aspect Series);

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: March 27, 2007


By /s/ PER DYRVIK
   --------------------------------------
Per Dyrvik
Managing Director and Treasurer
UBS Managed Fund Services, Inc.,
the Registrant's Sponsor
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR FISCAL QUARTER ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<CASH>                            1,009,864
<SECURITIES>                          8,145
<RECEIVABLES>                       165,563
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                         587,579
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  3,179,549
<PP&E>                            4,598,743
<DEPRECIATION>                    1,319,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   18,729,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             4,788,529
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                         140,138
<COMMON>                            491,003
<OTHER-SE>                       12,895,342
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     18,729,267
<SALES>                              57,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     57,305
<CGS>                                56,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        56,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,145,642
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   16,440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (1,826,346)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,826,346)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,826,346)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.04)
        


</TABLE>
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 28 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 28 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 2 of 2
CITY OF CODY 

WYOMING 

Nancy Tia Brown 

MAYOR 

Donny Anderson 

Bryan Edwards 

Jerry Fritz 

Landon Greer 

Steve Miller 

Stan Wolz 

COUNCD.. MEMBERS 

C. Edward Webster II 

MUNICIPAL JUDGE 

Jennifer R. Rosencranse 

CITY ADMINISTRATOR 

1338 Rumsey Avenue 

P.O. Box 2200 

Cody, Wyoming 82414 

(307) 527-7511 

FAX (307) 527-6532 

~....._- ....... , '? 

: . .l /~ u 

March 5, 2013 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Dear Mr. Martin: 

On behalf of the City of Cody Governing Body, please accept this letter of 

support for SkyWest Airlines providing essential air service to Yellowstone 

Regional Airport in Cody, Wyoming. 

As you are well aware, the number of enplanements at Yellowstone Regional 

Airport has a huge economic impact to the City of Cody and the sustainability 

of economic growth and future development for Cody. SkyWest has been a 

great partner to the Yellowstone Regional Airport for many years and we are 

encouraged that this partnership will continue. 

Thank you all once again for your leadership and insight in this program and 

we wish you great success in ensuring the continuation of year round air 

service In the Cody Community. 

Sincerely, A 

Mayor 

~1~~
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE04360A130
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RICHARD LEE DUMAS,

Petitioner,

 Case No. 3:04cv15/MCR/EMT

JAMES CROSBY, JR.,

Respondent.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated October 26, 2005. Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the

report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of December, 2005.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-00015-MCR-EMT Document 24 Filed 12/02/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.15
FOURTH AMENDMENT 
TO 
THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION 
2003 INCENTIVE PLAN 
The Progressive Corporation 2003 Incentive Plan, as heretofore amended (the “Plan”), is hereby amended as follows: 
1. The second sentence of the first paragraph of Section 2 of the Plan is hereby deleted, and the following is substituted in its place: 
“The Committee shall consist of not less than two directors of the Company, all of whom shall be Non-Employee Directors and Outside Directors.” 
2. Except as expressly modified hereby, the terms of the Plan shall be unchanged. 
This Amendment will be effective as of April 20, 2012. 
	
	
	 

	/s/ Charles E. Jarrett

	Charles E. Jarrett

	Secretary
Letter from Christopher P. Lowe, dated March 19, 2009



 Exhibit 10.40 
 March 19, 2009 
 Steve Van Dick 
 Hansen Medical, Inc. 
 800 East Middlefield Road 
 Mountain View, CA 94043 
 Dear Steve, 
 I hereby request that the cash fees due to me for my service as a non-employee director of Hansen Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) during the 2009 calendar year be reduced by 15%. This applies to each annual retainer and meeting fee
due to me, whether for my service as a non-employee director generally or for my service on any committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	/s/ CHRISTOPHER P. LOWE
	Christopher P. Lowe
Exhibit






Second Amendment to Rights Agreement


This Second Amendment to Rights Agreement is made and entered into this 27th day of February, 2018 (the “Amendment”), by and between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., a federally chartered trust company, as successor rights agent to BankBoston, N.A. (the “Rights Agent”). 


Recitals:


WHEREAS, the Company and BankBoston, N.A. executed that certain Rights Agreement, dated as of August 20, 1999, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Rights Agreement, by and between the Company and the Rights Agent, dated as of September 12, 2008 (collectively, the “Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company’s stockholders were granted certain rights to acquire shares of the Company’s Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (collectively, the “Preferred Stock”), under the circumstances and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement; and


WHEREAS, the Company and the Rights Agent desire to further amend certain terms and conditions of the Agreement as set forth herein.


NOW THEREFORE, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


1.    Amendment to Section 7(a) of the Agreement.  Section 7(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by changing the Final Expiration Date, as defined therein, to “February 27, 2018.” 


2.    Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute together but one and the same instrument.  A signature to this Amendment executed and/or transmitted electronically shall have the same authority, effect, and enforceability as an original signature.
 
3.    Governing Law.  THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A CONTRACT MADE UNDER AND GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AND FOR ALL PURPOSES SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF SUCH STATE APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS MADE AND TO BE PERFORMED ENTIRELY WITHIN SUCH STATE.


4.    Successors and Assigns.  This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.


5.    No Other Modification.  Except to the extent specifically provided to the contrary in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, without modification or limitation.  In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the Agreement and this Amendment, this Amendment will control and supersede to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency.


WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.


CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION


By: /s/ Beth W. Cooper            
Name: Beth W. Cooper
Its: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A,
as Rights Agent
                
By: /s/ Dennis V. Moccia              
Name: Dennis V. Moccia
Its: Manager, Contract Administration


 


1
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****� Annual performance report**
 
1998 | 2000 | 2003 | 2004 | 2008
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.4001/3:
Item Number:0474-A-20
CGP systemNumber:000483247
 
February 3, 2020
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2861 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Chloral. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Chloral. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHLORAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.31 Trichloroacetaldehyde (CAS 

No. 75–87–6) (provided for 

in subheading 2913.00.50) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2861 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### Terrence Olton, Respondent, v County of Westchester, Appellant.

an action to recover damages for breach of a collective bargaining agreement, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 8, 1980, which, *inter alia,*denied its motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to exhaust his remedies under the agreement. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted, and complaint dismissed. The use of the word "right” in the preamble of the section of the collective bargaining agreement entitled grievance procedure should not be construed to mean that the grievance resolution procedure contained therein was an optional method of dispute resolution (cf. *Kornit v Board of Educ.,*54 AD2d 959, mot for lv to app den 41 NY2d 804). The interpretation employed by Special Term is not in accord with this State’s policy toward the resolution of public sector labor disputes (see Civil Service Law, § 200; *Matter of Acting Supt. of Schools of Liverpool Cent. School Dist. [United Liverpood Faculty Assn.],*42 NY2d 509, 512). It has been said that: "A contrary rule which would permit an individual employee to completely sidestep available griev*845anee procedures in favor of a lawsuit has little to commend it * * * it would deprive employer and union of the ability to establish a uniform and exclusive method for orderly settlement of employment grievances. If a grievance procedure cannot be made exclusive, it loses much of its desirability as a method of settlement” *(Republic Steel v Maddox,*379 US 650, 653 [applying Federal law]). Plaintiff's failure to exhaust the remedy provided in the collective bargaining agreement mandates the dismissal of the complaint (see *Rieder v State Univ. of N.Y.,*47 AD2d 865, affd 39 NY2d 845; see, also, *Vaca v Sipes,*386 US 171, 184). However, under the facts and circumstances of this case, if the plaintiff should file a grievance, he should not be denied relief on a claim of untimeliness (cf. *Matter of Whitley v Board of Educ.,*65 AD2d 821). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KELVIN BOWMAN,

 Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:03cv568/RV/EMT

JAMES CROSBY, JR., et al.,

 Defendants.

O R D E R

Plaintiff was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in this civil rights action in this district

court. The action was dismissed, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for Plaintiff’s failure to

state an actionable claim (see Doc. 51). Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal (Doc. 54) and now seeks

leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 62).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed.R.App.P. 24(a), this court hereby certifies that this

appeal is NOT taken in good faith, and Plaintiff is NOT entitled to proceed in forma pauperis on

appeal. The reasons for this court’s decision are outlined in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated October 21, 2005 (Doc. 46) and this court’s order dated November 22, 2005

(Doc. 51) which adopted and incorporated that recommendation.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 62) is DENIED,

and he is directed to pay the full appellate filing fee of $255.00 within THIRTY (30) DAYS from

the date of docketing of this order.

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of February, 2006.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-00568-RV-EMT Document 63 Filed 02/01/06 Page 1 of 1
1

 Although plaintiff's motion is not, strictly speaking, a Rule 26(c) motion, the motion is

a "motion relating to discovery" under the terms of the General Order, and the court deems it

advisable to require a good faith conference in an effort to avoid dispute concerning additional

interrogatories.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

DAVID FINNEY, an individual, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.3:06cv622-WKW

)

TAKATA, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the plaintiff's motion for leave of court to propound additional

written interrogatories filed on October 17, 2006, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is DENIED pursuant to Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure 26(c) and 37(a)(2)(B) and ¶ 5 of the General Order of this court entered on

November 22, 1993.

The applicable provision of this court's General Order reads as follows:

The court will not consider any motion relating to discovery, such as a motion

to compel or a motion for protective order, unless the motion is accompanied

by a written certification that the moving party has made reasonable goodfaith effort to reach agreement with opposing counsel on the matters set forth

in the motion.

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(c)1

 and 37(a)(2)(B), as amended on December

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 22 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

1, 1993, require litigants to seek to resolve discovery disputes by a good faith conference

before seeking court intervention. Discovery motions filed pursuant to these Rules must be

accompanied by a certification that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to

confer with other affected parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without court action.

DONE, this 18th day of October, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 22 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 2 of 2
# L_2013315EN.01007401.xml

| 26.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 315/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 315/74

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1200/2013

of 25 November 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Cozza di Scardovari (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Cozza di Scardovari’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Cozza di Scardovari’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Cozza di Scardovari’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Cozza di Scardovari’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 170, 15.6.2013, p. 51.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.7.   Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom

ITALY

Cozza di Scardovari (PDO)

---
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 43-3 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 43-3 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 43-3 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 43-3 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 43-3 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 43-3 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 43-3 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 43-3 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 43-3 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 9 of 9