76486 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 8, 2010 / Notices 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 23) granting 

complainant’s motion to amend the 

complaint and notice of investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

James A. Worth, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3065. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on May 21, 2010, based on a complaint 

filed by Georgia-Pacific Consumer 

Products LP of Atlanta, Georgia 

(‘‘Georgia-Pacific’’), alleging violations of 

Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain electronic 

paper towel dispensing devices and 

components thereof by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of United 

States Patent Nos. 6,871,815; 7,017,856; 

7,182,289; and 7,387,274. 75 FR 28651– 

2 (May 21, 2010). The complainant 

named as respondents Kruger Products 

LP of Mississauga, Canada (‘‘Kruger’’); 

KTG USA LP of Memphis, Tennessee 

(‘‘KTG USA’’); Stefco Industries, Inc. of 

Haines City, Florida (‘‘Stefco’’); Cellynne 

Corporation of Haines City, Florida 

(‘‘Cellyne’’); Draco Hygienic Products 

Inc. of Ontario, California; NetPak 

Electronic Plastic and Cosmetic, Inc., d/ 

b/a/Open for Business of Chicago, 

Illinois (‘‘NetPak Chicago’’); NetPak 

Electronik Plastik ve Kozmetik Sanayi, 

Ve Ticaret Ltd of Izmir, Turkey (‘‘NetPak 

Turkey’’); Paradigm Marketing 

Consortium, Inc. of Syosset, New York; 

United Sourcing Network Corp. of 

Syosset, New York; New Choice (H.K.) 

Ltd. of Shatin, Hong Kong; and Vida 

International Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan. 

On August 16, 2010, the Commission 

issued notice of its determination not to 

review an ID amending the complaint 

and notice of investigation: (1) To 

correct the corporate name of NetPak 

Chicago; (2) to redefine ‘‘Kruger’’ to 

‘‘Kruger Products and/or KTG USA’’; (3) 

to indicate that Georgia-Pacific no 

longer alleges that NetPak Turkey is the 

source of Stefco’s and Cellynne’s 

accused product; (4) to add new 

respondents Jet Power International 

Limited; Winco Industries Co.; DWL 

Industries Co.; Ko-Am Corporation Inc. 

d/b/a Janitor’s World; Natury, S.A. De 

C.V.; Update International Inc.; and 

AIM. 

On October 25, 2010, Georgia-Pacific 

filed a motion seeking to further amend 

the complaint and notice of 

investigation to correct the corporate 

name of the respondent originally 

identified as ‘‘Update International Inc.’’ 

to ‘‘Franklin Financial Management, Inc. 

d/b/a Update International’’ of 

California, and to make certain other 

technical corrections. On November 10, 

2010, the ALJ issued Order No. 23, 

granting the motion. No petitions for 

review were filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in Section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 3, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30857 Filed 12–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

JOINT BOARD FOR THE 

ENROLLMENT OF ACTUARIES 

Meeting of the Advisory Committee; 

Meeting 

AGENCY: Joint Board for the Enrollment 

of Actuaries. 

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory 

Committee meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Executive Director of the 

Joint Board for the Enrollment of 

Actuaries gives notice of a meeting of 

the Advisory Committee on Actuarial 

Examinations (portions of which will be 

open to the public) in Washington, DC 

at the Office of Professional 

Responsibility on January 6 and 7, 2011. 

DATES: Thursday, January 6, 2011, from 

9 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Friday, January 7, 

2011, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the Internal Revenue Service, 1111 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patrick W. McDonough, Executive 

Director of the Joint Board for the 

Enrollment of Actuaries, 202–622–8225. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that the Advisory 

Committee on Actuarial Examinations 

will meet at the Internal Revenue 

Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC, on Thursday, 

January 6, 2011, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., 

and Friday, January 7, 2011, from 8:30 

a.m. to 5 p.m. 

The purpose of the meeting is to 

discuss topics and questions that may 

be recommended for inclusion on future 

Joint Board examinations in actuarial 

mathematics and methodology referred 

to in 29 U.S.C. 1242(a)(1)(B) and to 

review the November 2010 Pension 

(EA–2A) Joint Board Examination in 

order to make recommendations relative 

thereto, including the minimum 

acceptable pass score. Topics for 

inclusion on the syllabus for the Joint 

Board’s examination program for the 

May 2011 Basic (EA–1) Examination 

and the May 2011 Pension (EA–2B) 

Examination will be discussed. 

A determination has been made as 

required by section 10(d) of the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., 

that the portions of the meeting dealing 

with the discussion of questions that 

may appear on the Joint Board’s 

examinations and the review of the 

November 2010 Joint Board examination 

fall within the exceptions to the open 

meeting requirement set forth in 5 

U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that the public 

interest requires that such portions be 

closed to public participation. 

The portion of the meeting dealing 

with the discussion of the other topics 

will commence at 1 p.m. on January 6 

and will continue for as long as 

necessary to complete the discussion, 

but not beyond 3 p.m. Time permitting, 

after the close of this discussion by 

Committee members, interested persons 

may make statements germane to this 

subject. Persons wishing to make oral 

statements should notify the Executive 

Director in writing prior to the meeting 

in order to aid in scheduling the time 

available and should submit the written 

text, or at a minimum, an outline of 

comments they propose to make orally. 

Such comments will be limited to 10 

minutes in length. All persons planning 

to attend the public session should 

notify the Executive Director in writing 

to obtain building entry. Notifications of 

intent to make an oral statement or to 

attend must be faxed, no later than 

December 31, 2010, to 202–622–8300, 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 8, 2010 / Notices 76487 

Attn: Executive Director. Any interested 

person also may file a written statement 

for consideration by the Joint Board and 

the Committee by sending it to the 

Internal Revenue Service, Joint Board 

for the Enrollment of Actuaries, Attn: 

Executive Director, SE:OPR, 1111 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20224. 

Dated: December 2, 2010. 

Patrick W. McDonough, 

Executive Director, Joint Board for the 

Enrollment of Actuaries. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30708 Filed 12–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Proposed Consent Decree 

Under the Clean Water Act 

Notice is hereby given that on 

December 2, 2010, a proposed Consent 

Decree was lodged. United States et al. 

v. Beazer Homes USA, Inc., Civil Action 

No. 3:10-cv-01133, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

Middle District of Tennessee. 

The Consent Decree in this Clean 

Water Act enforcement action against 

Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (‘‘Beazer’’) 

resolves allegations by the 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

asserted in a complaint filed together 

with the Consent Decree, under Section 

309 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 

1319, for alleged stormwater violations 

at Beazer’s home sites in 21 states 

nationwide. The proposed Consent 

Decree also resolves separate but related 

state law claims brought by co-plaintiff 

States of Colorado, Florida, Indiana, 

Maryland, Nevada, Tennessee, and 

Virginia. In addition to the payment of 

civil penalties, the settlement requires 

Beazer to develop improved pollution 

prevention plans for each construction 

site, conduct additional site inspections, 

and promptly correct any problems 

detected. Beazer must properly train 

construction managers and contractors, 

and implement a management and 

internal reporting system to improve 

oversight of on-the-ground operations. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

comments relating to the proposed 

Consent Decrees for a period of thirty 

(30) days from the date of this 

publication. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and either e-mailed 

to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to the 

matters as United States et al. v. Beazer 

Homes USA, Inc., DOJ Ref. No. 90–5–1– 

1–08420. 

The Consent Decree may be examined 

at the Region 4 Office of the United 

States Environmental Protection 

Agency, located at the Sam Nunn 

Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth 

Street, SW., Atlanta, GA 30303–8960. 

During the public comment period, 

the proposed agreements may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site: http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. Copies of the 

proposed agreements may also be 

obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting 

from the Consent Decree Library a copy 

of the consent decree for United States 

et al. v. Beazer Homes USA, Inc., Civil 

Action No. 3:10-cv-01133, please 

enclose a check in the amount of $44.00 

(25 cents per page reproduction cost), 

payable to the U.S. Treasury. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30743 Filed 12–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–74,390] 

Haldex Brake Corporation, Commercial 

Vehicle Systems, Including On-Site 

Leased Workers of Johnston 

Integration Technologies, a Subsidiary 

of Johnston Companies, Iola, KS; 

Amended Certification Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 

19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor 

issued a Certification of Eligibility to 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance on August 19, 2010, 

applicable to workers of Haldex Brake 

Corporation, Commercial Vehicle 

Systems, Iola, Kansas. The Department’s 

notice of determination was published 

in the Federal Register on September 3, 

2010 (75 FR 54186). 

At the request of the State workforce 

agency, the Department reviewed the 

certification for workers of the subject 

firm. The workers were engaged in the 

production of automotive brake system 

components. 

The company reports that workers 

leased from Johnston Integration 

Technologies, a subsidiary of Johnston 

Companies were employed on-site at the 

Iola, Kansas location of Haldex Brake 

Corporation. The Department has 

determined that these workers were 

sufficiently under the control of the 

subject firm to be considered leased 

workers. 

Based on these findings, the 

Department is amending this 

certification to include workers leased 

from Johnston Integration Technologies, 

a subsidiary of Johnston Companies 

working on-site at the Iola, Kansas 

location of Haldex Brake Corporation. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–74,390 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers of Haldex Brake Corporation, 

Commercial Vehicle Systems, including onsite leased workers of Johnston Integration 

Technologies, a subsidiary of Johnston 

Companies, Iola, Kansas, who became totally 

or partially separated from employment on or 

after July 15, 2009 through August 19, 2012, 

and all workers in the group threatened with 

total or partial separation from employment 

on the date of certification through two years 

from the date of certification, are eligible to 

apply for adjustment assistance under 

Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, 

as amended. 

Signed in Washington, DC this 24th day of 

November, 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30746 Filed 12–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of November 22, 2010 

through November 26, 2010. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES