alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 658.1 Purpose.

This part sets out the criteria developed by the Secretary of Agriculture, in cooperation with other Federal agencies, pursuant to section 1541(a) of the Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA or the Act) 7 U.S.C. 4202(a). As required by section 1541(b) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 4202(b), Federal agencies are (a) to use the criteria to identify and take into account the adverse effects of their programs on the preservation of farmland, (b) to consider alternative actions, as appropriate, that could lessen adverse effects, and (c) to ensure that their programs, to the extent practicable, are compatible with State and units of local government and private programs and policies to protect farmland. Guidelines to assist agencies in using the criteria are included in this part. The Department of Agriculture (hereinafter USDA) may make available to States, units of local government, individuals, organizations, and other units of the Federal Government, information useful in restoring, maintaining, and improving the quantity and quality of farmland.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 4 A1 18 7 . KEVI N L. PELLETT v . GEORGI A DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

BOARD OF REVI EW

.

I n this d irec t ap p eal, K ev in Pellett s e e k s rev iew o f the su perio r c ou rt’ s o rd er

af f irming the d ec isio n of the G eo rgia D e partment o f Labo r to d en y his c laim f o r

p and emic u nemp lo y m e n t b enef its. Und er OCGA § 5- 6

- 35 (a) (1 ), ho w ev er, a p arty

seek ing to ap p eal a su p erio r co u r t d ec isio n rev iew ing a state agenc y ru ling mu st f o llo w

the d isc r etio nary ap p eal p ro c e d u re. See D u n l a p v

. C i ty o f Atla nta

, 27 2 Ga. 523, 524

( 5 3 1 S E 2 d 702) (2000). B ec au se Pellett f a iled to f

o llo w t he p ro p er ap p ellate

p ro c ed ure, this ap p eal is hereby D I SM I SSED f o r lac k o f j urisd ic tio n. See id

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e , A t la n t a ,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I c e r t i fy t ha t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. April 12, 2024

04/12/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2578 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2578

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain golf club driver heads with 
                      rhombus shaped center face.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 6, 2006

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain golf club driver heads with 
                      rhombus shaped center face.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN GOLF CLUB DRIVER HEADS WITH RHOMBUS SHAPED CENTER 
              FACE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.95.15      Golf club driver    Free         No Change        No Change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         heads of                                                           31/2009
                         titanium, each
                         with a rhombus
                         shaped center
                         face insert and a
                         laser welded face
                         plate, the
                         foregoing with a
                         9 or 12 degree
                         loft (provided
                         for in subheading
                         9506.39.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 756.12 Payment limitation. ( a ) For the program year 2015, direct or indirect payments made to an eligible person or legal entity, other than a joint venture or general partnership, will not exceed $125,000.
( b ) The attribution of payment provisions in 7 CFR 1400.105 will be used to attribute payments to persons and legal entities for payment limitation determinations.
§ 701.14 Onsite inspections. ( a ) An onsite inspection must be made before approval of any request for ECP or EFRP assistance.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, onsite inspections may be waived by FSA, in its discretion only, where damage is so severe that an onsite inspection is unnecessary, as determined by FSA.
[69 FR 10302, Mar. 4, 2004, as amended at 75 FR 70088, Nov. 17, 2010]
# 52.251 [Reserved]

- 52.251-1 Government Supply Sources. 
- 52.251-2 Interagency Fleet Management System Vehicles and Related Services. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
§ 614.6 Agency records and decision notices. ( a ) All NRCS decisions under this part are based upon an agency record. NRCS will supplement the agency record, as appropriate, during the informal appeals process.
( b ) NRCS notifies participants of the agency's preliminary and final technical determinations and program decisions through decision notices. By certified mail, return receipt requested, NRCS will send to the participant a decision notice within 10 working days of rendering a technical determination or program decision. In lieu of certified mail, NRCS may hand deliver notices to participants with written acknowledgment of delivery by the participant. Each decision notice contains the following: ( 1 ) The factual basis for the technical determination or program;
( 2 ) The regulatory, statutory, or policy basis for the technical determination or program decision; and
( 3 ) Information regarding any informal appeal rights available under this part; the process for requesting such appeal; and the procedure for requesting further review before the FSA county committee pursuant to 7 CFR part 780 or NAD pursuant to 7 CFR part 11.
#### § 46.22 Accounting for dumped produce.

A clear and complete record shall be maintained showing justification for dumping of produce received on joint account, on consignment, or handled for or on behalf of another person if any portion of such produce regardless of percentage cannot be sold due to poor condition or is lost through re-sorting or reconditioning. In addition to the foregoing, if five percent or more of a shipment is dumped, an official certificate, or other adequate evidence, shall be obtained to prove the produce was actually without commercial value, unless there is a specific agreement to the contrary between the parties. The original certificate or other adequate evidence justifying dumping shall be forwarded to the consignor or joint account partner with the accounting and a copy shall be retained by the receiver.
§ 760.908 Deceased individuals or dissolved entities. ( a ) Payments may be made for eligible losses suffered by an eligible participant who is now a deceased individual or is a dissolved entity if a representative, who currently has authority to enter into a contract, on behalf of the participant, signs the application for payment.
( b ) Legal documents showing proof of authority to sign for the deceased individual or dissolved entity must be provided.
( c ) If a participant is now a dissolved general partnership or joint venture, all members of the general partnership or joint venture at the time of dissolution or their duly authorized representatives must sign the application for payment.
#### In the Matter of Hilda Kolitz, Petitioner, v Barbara Blum, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

In this transferred article 78 proceeding, determination of respondent State Commissioner of Social Services dated August 8, 1978, affirming the determination of the New York City Department of Social Services discontinuing grant of home relief to petitioner for a specified period is unanimously annulled, on the law, without costs, and the matter is remanded to the State commissioner for further proceedings. The petitioner was at all times ready and willing to perform in the "Public Works Project”. She had at one time been a cosmetologist and beautician and gainfully employed. However, an operation was needed on the nerves of her right and left hands, and as a result of those operations and infirmities, she claims that the use of her hands has been limited. She was directed to the Amsterdam Welfare Center for work that involved the use of her hands, which she tried to do, and found the condition difficult. She asked for another assignment, which was not given to her. Respondents did not examine the petitioner nor offer any evidence to rebut her claim of illness, nor offer an alternative activity, but suspended the home relief assistance. The rejection of petitioner’s excuse was thus arbitrary and without rational basis. We annul the determination and remand the matter for further inquiry. (See *Matter of Martin v Blum,*74 AD2d 555.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Lupiano and Lynch, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6431

FRED LEWIS WILSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

B. COLLINS, Sgt.; M. WILLIAMS, C/O; H. BISHOP, C/O; J. 

DURHAM, C/O; SGT. KING; LT. KILBOURNE; C/O HYLTON; C/O BOYD; 

C/O ROBERTS; C/O TABOR; SGT. ELY; TED THOMPSON, Dr.; M. 

STANFORD, RN; MELISSA SPEARS, LPN; PATSY GARNETTE ZEPPA, RN; 

PATRICIA HILLMAN, RN,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District 

Judge. (7:08-cv-00638-GEC-MFU)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 9, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Lewis Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, Jeff W. 

Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Fred Lewis Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order granting partial summary judgment for Defendants in this 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Wilson seeks 

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny 

Wilson’s pending motions for discovery and to amend and dismiss 

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# L_2014083EN.01000101.xml

| 20.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 83/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 274/2014

of 14 March 2014

correcting the Lithuanian language version of Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 establishing a list of permitted health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | There are errors in the Lithuanian language version of Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 (2) which should be corrected. Due to the high number of repetitive corrections, the Annex in the Lithuanian language version should be replaced in full. The other language versions are not affected. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

There are errors in the Lithuanian language version of Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 (2) which should be corrected. Due to the high number of repetitive corrections, the Annex in the Lithuanian language version should be replaced in full. The other language versions are not affected.

| (2) | Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 should therefore be corrected accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 should therefore be corrected accordingly.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Concerns only the Lithuanian language version.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 March 2014.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 404, 30.12.2006, p. 9.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 of 16 May 2012 establishing a list of permitted health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health (OJ L 136, 25.5.2012, p. 1).

2

---
EX-35 (d)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 06, 2007

Mortgage Asset Securitization Transactions, Inc.
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for MASTR Adjustable Rate Mortgages Trust
2006-0A2

Per Section 3.21 a of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
10/1/2006, the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Trust
Administrator), hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or
portion thereof:

(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement or
     such other applicable Agreement in the case of a Servicing Function
     Participant, has been made under such officer's supervision and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, in all material
     respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there has been a
     failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifying
     each such failure known to such officer and the nature and status thereof.




Certified By:
/s/ Barry Akers
Barry Akers
Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
#### § 51.695 Well colored.

*Well colored* means that the fruit is yellow or orange in color with practically no trace of green color.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsImpact of flying qualities on mission effectiveness for helicopter air combat, volume 1A computer simulation to investigate the impact of flying qualities on mission effectiveness is described. The objective of the study was to relate the effects of flying qualities, such as precision of flight path control and pilot workload, to the ability of a single Scout helicopter, or helicopter team, to accomplish a specified anti-armor mission successfully. The model of the actual engagement is a Monte Carlo simulation that has the capability to assess the effects of helicopter characteristics, numbers, tactics and weaponization on the force's ability to accomplish a specific mission against a specified threat as a function of realistic tactical factors. A key feature of this program is a simulation of micro-terrain features and their effects on detection, exposure, and masking for nap-of-the-earth (NOE) flight.Document ID19880004718Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHarris, T. M.*(Flight Systems, Inc. Newport Beach, CA, United States)*Beerman, D. A.*(Flight Systems, Inc. Newport Beach, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1983Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:166568TR-87-A-1NASA-CR-166568Accession Number88N14100Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS2-11178PROJECT: RTOP 992-21-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880004718.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 763.18 General servicing responsibilities. ( a ) For the prompt payment guarantee plan, the seller must use a third party escrow agent approved by the Agency. The escrow agent will: ( 1 ) Provide the Agency a copy of the recorded Land Contract;
( 2 ) Handle transactions relating to the Land Contract between the buyer and seller;
( 3 ) Receive Land Contract installment payments from the buyer and send them to the seller;
( 4 ) Provide evidence to the Agency that property taxes are paid and insurance is kept current on the security property;
( 5 ) Send a notice of payment due to the buyer at least 30 days prior to the installment due date;
( 6 ) Notify the Agency and the seller if the buyer defaults;
( 7 ) Service delinquent accounts as specified in § 763.20(a);
( 8 ) Make demand on the Agency to pay missed payments;
( 9 ) Send the seller any missed payment amount paid by the Agency under the guarantee;
( 10 ) Notify the Agency on March 31 and September 30 of each year of the outstanding balance on the Land Contract and the status of payment; and
( 11 ) Perform other duties as required by State law and as agreed to by the buyer and the seller;
( b ) For the standard guarantee plan, the seller must use a third party servicing agent approved by the Agency. The servicing agent will: ( 1 ) Provide the Agency a copy of the recorded Land Contract;
( 2 ) Handle transactions relating to the Land Contract between the buyer and seller;
( 3 ) Receive Land Contract installment payments from the buyer and send them to the seller;
( 4 ) Provide evidence to the Agency that property taxes are paid and insurance is kept current on the security property;
( 5 ) Perform a physical inspection of the farm each year during the term of the guarantee, and provide an annual inspection report to the Agency;
( 6 ) Obtain from the buyer a current balance sheet, income statement, cash flow budget, and any additional information needed, perform, and provide the Agency an analysis of the buyer's financial condition on an annual basis;
( 7 ) Notify the Agency on March 31 and September 30 of each year of the outstanding balance on the Land Contract and the status of payment;
( 8 ) Send a notice of payment due to the buyer at least 30 days prior to the installment due date;
( 9 ) Notify the Agency and the seller if the buyer defaults;
( 10 ) Service delinquent accounts as specified in § 763.20(b); and
( 11 ) Perform other duties as required by State law and as agreed to by the buyer and the seller.
The Skywalker UAS manual is too large for upload to regulations.gov. Therefore, if interested, 

please follow the link below to the assembly and operating manual for the sUAS.

http://www.bevrc.com/download/Sky-Walker_Pro_Manual_V1.03.pdf
§ 51.2337 Application of tolerances. The contents of individual containers in a lot, based on sample inspection, are subject to the following limitations: ( a ) Individual samples shall not have more than double a specified tolerance except that at least two defective specimens may be permitted in any container: *Provided,* That not more than one fruit which is frozen or affected by decay be permitted in any container 3 pounds or less; and, *Provided further,* That the averages for the entire lot are within the tolerances specified for the grade.
[47 FR 34513, Aug. 10, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 40186, Oct. 2, 1985; 51 FR 4293, Feb. 4, 1986]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Criminal Case No. 2:06-CR-169-WHA

)

WILMONT TIMOTHY BARNETT )

MOTION TO PRODUCE DEFENDANT FOR PRETRIAL HEARING

COMES NOW Defendant Wilmont Timothy Barnett, by and through counsel, to move

the Court to Order that Defendant be produced by the United States Marshal for the pretrial

hearing on September 28, 2007.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this __24th__ day of September, 2007.

/s/ JAY LEWIS

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, L.L.C.

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, Alabama 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

J-Lewis@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-2014-E66J

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 315 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the _24th_ day of September, 2007, I electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of

such filing to the following parties or counsel:

A. Clark Morris

Office of the United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

/s/ JAY LEWIS

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, L.L.C.

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, Alabama 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

J-Lewis@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-2014-E66J

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 315 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 756.16 Maintenance and inspection of records. ( a ) Producers randomly selected for compliance spot checks by FSA must, in accordance with program notice instructions issued by the Deputy Administrator, provide adequate reports of revenue as applicable. The producer must report documentary evidence of crop revenue to FSA together with any supporting documentation to verify information entered on the application. Verifiable documentation is preferred. If verifiable documentation is not available, FSA will accept reliable documentation, if determined to be acceptable by the FSA county committee.
( b ) If supporting documentation is not presented to the county FSA office requesting the information within 30 calendar days of the request, producers will be determined ineligible for OFF Program benefits.
( c ) The producer must maintain any existing books, records, and accounts supporting any information furnished in an approved OFF Program application for 3 years following the end of the year during which the application for payment was filed.
( d ) The producer must permit authorized representatives of the Department of Agriculture and the General Accounting Office, during regular business hours, to inspect, examine, and make copies of such books, records, and accounts.