alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ROBERT LEE HARPER,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 1:21-cv-4-AW-GRJ

SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEP’T OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s September 14, 2021 Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 18. I have also considered de novo the issues raised in 

Petitioner’s objections. ECF No. 19. I have determined the Report and 

Recommendation should be adopted. It is now ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18) is adopted and 

incorporated into this order.

2. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “The § 2254 petition is 

dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.”

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

4. The clerk will close the file.

SO ORDERED on October 6, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:21-cv-00004-AW-GRJ Document 20 Filed 10/06/21 Page 1 of 1
# Subpart 232.72 - Reserved

**Parent topic:**Part 232 - CONTRACT FINANCING
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 7-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 624.3 Scope.

EWP Program technical and financial assistance may be made available to a qualified sponsor, or landowners when a floodplain easement is the selected alternative by the Secretary of Agriculture, upon a qualified sponsor or landowner's request when a Federal emergency is declared by the President or when a local emergency is declared by the NRCS State Conservationist. The EWP Program is designed for emergency recovery work, including the purchase of floodplain easements. Emergency watershed protection is authorized in the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa.
Editorial Note on Part 762
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 762 appear at 72 FR 63297, Nov. 8, 2007.

§ 762.141 Reporting requirements. Lenders are responsible for providing the local Agency credit officer with all of the following information on the loan and the borrower: ( a ) When the guaranteed loan becomes 30 days past due, and following the lender's meeting or attempts to meet with the borrower, all lenders will submit the appropriate Agency form showing guaranteed loan borrower default status. The form will be resubmitted every 60 days until the default is cured either through restructuring or liquidation.
( b ) All lenders will submit the appropriate guaranteed loan status reports as of March 31 and September 30 of each year;
( c ) CLP lenders also must provide the following: ( 1 ) A written summary of the lender's annual analysis of the borrower's operation. This summary should describe the borrower's progress and prospects for the upcoming operating cycle. This annual analysis may be waived or postponed if the borrower is financially strong. The summary will include a description of the reasons an analysis was not necessary.
( 2 ) For lines of credit, an annual certification stating that a cash flow projecting at least a feasible plan has been developed, that the borrower is in compliance with the provisions of the line of credit agreement, and that the previous year income and loan funds and security proceeds have been accounted for.
( d ) In addition to the requirements of paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section, the standard eligible lender also will provide: ( 1 ) Borrower's balance sheet, and income and expense statement for the previous year.
( 2 ) For lines of credit, the cash flow for the borrower's operation that projects a feasible plan or better for the upcoming operating cycle. The standard eligible lender must receive approval from the Agency before advancing future years' funds.
( 3 ) An annual farm visit report or collateral inspection.
( e ) PLP lenders will submit additional reports as required in their lender's agreement.
( f ) A lender receiving a final loss payment must complete and return an annual report on its collection activities for each unsatisfied account for 3 years following payment of the final loss claim.
§ 51.2127 Injury. *Injury* means any defect which more than slightly detracts from the appearance of the individual almond. The following shall be considered as injury: ( a ) Chipped and scratched kernels when the affected area on an individual kernel aggregates more than the equivalent of a circle one-eighth inch (3.2 mm) in diameter.
1 

4270117-1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION – IN ADMIRALTY 

IN RE SKANSKA USA CIVIL § 

SOUTHEAST INC. AND § ADMIRALTY RULE 9(H) 

SKANSKA USA, INC., AS OWNERS § 

OF THE BARGE KS 5531 § CIVIL ACTION NO. 

PRAYING FOR EXONERATION § 3:20-cv-05980 

FROM OR FOR LIMITATION OF § 

LIABILITY § 

__________________________________________________________________ 

MOTION OF WALTER F. BECKER, JR. TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE 

Walter F. Becker, Jr., pursuant to N. D. Fla. Loc. R. 11.1(C), respectfully 

moves to appear pro hac vice in this matter and represents the following: 

1. Movant is an attorney and a member of the law firm of Chaffe 

McCall, LLP, 1100 Poydras Street, Suite 2300, New Orleans, Louisiana 70163. 

Chaffe McCall’s phone number is 504-585-7000. 

2. Chaffe McCall and Walter F. Becker, Jr. were retained by Petitioners, 

Skanksa USA Civil Southeast Inc. and Skanska USA, Inc. to provide legal 

representation in connection with the above-styled matter now pending before this 

Court. 

3. Movant is not an active or inactive member of The Florida Bar. 

4. Movant regularly practices law in the State of Louisiana and is a 

member in good standing of the Louisiana State Bar. A Certificate of Good 

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1241 Filed 08/10/21 Page 1 of 2
2 

4270117-1

Standing from the Louisiana State Bar is attached as Exhibit A, and is dated within 

thirty days of the filing of this motion. 

5. Movant certifies that he has successfully completed the Attorney 

Admission Tutorial and exam, confirmation number 

FLND16284544274751, the CM/ECF Tutorial, and certifies that he is 

familiar with the CM/ECF e-filing system. 

6. Movant maintains an upgraded PACER account. 

7. Movant has paid the pro hac vice fee in the amount set by this Court. 

8. Movant agrees to comply with the provisions of the Florida Rules of 

Professional Conduct. 

9. Movant certifies that he has never been subject to any suspension or 

disbarment proceedings. 

WHEREFORE, Walter F. Becker, Jr. respectfully requests that this Court 

grant leave of court and permit him to appear pro hac vice in this case. 

/s/ Walter F. Becker, Jr. 

Walter F. Becker, Jr. 

Louisiana Bar No. 01685 

Chaffe McCall, LLP 

1100 Poydras Street, Suite 2300 

New Orleans, LA 70163 

504-585-7000 

becker@chaffe.com 

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1241 Filed 08/10/21 Page 2 of 2
52.232-1 Payments.       As prescribed in 32.111(a)(1), insert the following clause, appropriately modified with respect to payment due date in accordance with agency regulations, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price supply contract, a fixed-price service contract, or a contract for nonregulated communication services is contemplated:          Payments (Apr 1984)          The Government shall pay the Contractor, upon the submission of proper invoices or vouchers, the prices stipulated in this contract for supplies delivered and accepted or services rendered and accepted, less any deductions provided in this contract. Unless otherwise specified in this contract, payment shall be made on partial deliveries accepted by the Government if-                                       (a) The amount due on the deliveries warrants it; or                                          (b) The Contractor requests it and the amount due on the deliveries is at least $1,000 or 50 percent of the total contract price.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.232 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3022]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 35217]


Stillwater Central Railroad, Inc.--Lease and Operation 
Exemption--Hollis & Eastern Railroad L.L.C.

    Stillwater Central Railroad, Inc. (SLWC), a Class III carrier, has 
filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to lease and 
to operate, pursuant to a lease agreement (Agreement) entered into with 
Hollis & Eastern Railroad L.L.C. (H&E), 14 miles of H&E's rail line 
between milepost 0.0 at Duke, OK and milepost 14.0 at Altus, OK (the 
line).
    SLWC states that there is no provision or agreement that will limit 
future interchange with a third-party connecting carrier. See 49 CFR 
1150.43(h).
    SLWCS certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result of 
the transaction will not result in SLWC becoming a Class II or Class I 
rail carrier. However, because its projected annual revenues will 
exceed $5 million, SLWC also certifies that it has complied with notice 
requirements of 49 CFR 1150.42(e).
    The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on or shortly after 
March 6, 2010, at least 60 days after SLWC's certification of the 
notice requirements of section 49 CFR 1150.42(e).
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the 
exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than February 26, 
2010 (at least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective).
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 35217, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a 
copy of each pleading must be served on Karl Morell, of Counsel, Ball 
Janik LLP, Suite 225, 1455 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided:
    By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Andrea Pope-Matheson,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010-3022 Filed 2-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
#### Christiana C. Althaus, Respondent, *v.*Thomas R. Sharp, as Receiver, etc., Appellant.

(Argued June 16,1884;

decided June 24, 1884.)

*E. B. Hinsdale*for appellant.

*G. W. Oobterill*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
52.229-9 Taxes-Cost-Reimbursement Contracts with Foreign Governments.       As prescribed in 29.402-2(b), insert the following clause:          Taxes-Cost-Reimbursement Contracts with Foreign Governments (Mar 1990)                                       (a) 						            Any tax or duty from which the United States Government is exempt by agreement with the Government of ______ [*insert name of the foreign government*], or from which any subcontractor under this contract is exempt under the laws of ______ [*insert name of country*], shall not constitute an allowable cost under this contract.                                          (b) 						            If any subcontractor obtains a foreign tax credit that reduces its Federal income tax liability under the United States Internal Revenue Code (Title26, U.S. Code) because of the payment of any tax or duty that was reimbursed under this contract, the amount of the reduction shall be paid (not credited to the contract) to the Treasurer of the United States at the time the Federal income tax return is filed.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.229 [Reserved]
§ 760.1812 Payment calculation. ( a ) Payments will be calculated separately for crops based on the crop type, intended use, certified organic or conventional status, county, and crop year.
( b ) For forage crops with verifiable documentation of nutrient factors for the affected production and for the 3 preceding crop years, the payment will be equal to the producer's total affected production multiplied by the producer's verifiable percentage of loss, multiplied by the average market price, multiplied by 70 percent.
( c ) For forage crops with verifiable documentation of nutrient factors for the affected production but not for the 3 preceding crop years, the payment will be equal to the producer's total affected production multiplied by the county average percentage of loss in paragraph (f) of this section, multiplied by the average market price, multiplied by 70 percent, multiplied by 50 percent.
( d ) For crops other than forage with verifiable documentation of the total dollar value loss due to quality, the payment will be equal to the producer's total dollar value loss on the affected production, multiplied by 70 percent.
( e ) For crops other than forage without verifiable documentation of the total dollar value loss but with verifiable documentation of grading factors, the payment will be equal to the producer's affected production multiplied by the county average loss per unit of measure in paragraph (g) of this section, multiplied by 70 percent, multiplied by 50 percent.
( f ) The county average percentage of loss is the average percentage of loss from producers eligible for payment under paragraph (b) of this section if at least 5 producers in a county are eligible for payment for a crop under paragraph (b) of this section. If less than 5 producers in a county are eligible for payment for a crop under paragraph (b) of this section, the Deputy Administrator will: ( 1 ) Determine a county average percentage of loss based on the best available data, including, but not limited to, evidence of losses in contiguous counties; or
( 2 ) If a county average percentage of loss cannot be determined due to insufficient data, not issue payments to applicants under paragraph (c) of this section.
( g ) The county average loss per unit of measure is based on the weighted average sales price from producers eligible for payment under paragraph (d) of this section if at least 5 producers in a county are eligible for payment for a crop under paragraph (d) of this section. If less than 5 producers are eligible for payment in a county under paragraph (d) of this section, the Deputy Administrator will: ( 1 ) Determine a county average loss per unit of measure based on the best available data, including, but not limited to, evidence of losses in contiguous counties; or
( 2 ) If a county average loss per unit of measure cannot be determined due to insufficient data, not issue payments to applicants under paragraph (e) of this section.
3:20-cr-99/MCR

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 3:20-cr-99/MCR

FRANK MILLER FREEMAN, III

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. 

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts 1, 2, and 3 of the indictment. 

After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the 

subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined the guilty plea was knowing and 

voluntary and the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact 

containing each of the essential elements thereof. I therefore recommend the plea 

of guilty be accepted and the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence 

imposed accordingly.

Dated: March 8, 2021.

/s/ Hope Thai Cannon HOPE THAI CANNON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00099-MCR Document 32 Filed 03/08/21 Page 1 of 2
3:20-cr-99/MCR

Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed 

within twenty-four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different 

deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use 

only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the 

magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a magistrate 

judge's findings or recommendations contained in a report and 

recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 

waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on 

unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir. Rule 

3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Case 3:20-cr-00099-MCR Document 32 Filed 03/08/21 Page 2 of 2
52.226-5 Restrictions on Subcontracting Outside Disaster or Emergency Area.       As prescribed in 26.206(c), insert the following clause:          Restrictions on Subcontracting Outside Disaster or Emergency Area (Nov 2007)                                       (a)                   *Definitions.* The definitions of the following terms used in this clause are found in the Small Business Administration regulations at 13 CFR 125.6(e): cost of the contract, cost of contract performance incurred for personnel, cost of manufacturing, cost of materials, personnel, and subcontracting.                                          (b) 						            The Contractor agrees that in performance of the contract in the case of a contract for-                                                         (1)                         *Services (except construction)*. At least 50 percent of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for employees of the Contractor or employees of other businesses residing or primarily doing business in the area designated in the clause at FAR 52.226-4, Notice of Disaster or Emergency Area Set-Aside;                                                            (2)                         *Supplies (other than procurement from a nonmanufacturer of such supplies)*. The Contractor or employees of other businesses residing or primarily doing business in the set-aside area shall perform work for at least 50 percent of the cost of manufacturing the supplies, not including the cost of materials;                                                            (3)                         *General construction*. The Contractor will perform at least 15 percent of the cost of the contract, not including the cost of materials, with its own employees or employees of other businesses residing or primarily doing business in the set-aside area; or                                                            (4)                         *Construction by special trade Contractors*. The Contractor will perform at least 25 percent of the cost of the contract, not including the cost of materials, with its own employees or employees of other businesses residing or primarily doing business in the set-aside area.                                                                    (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.226 [Reserved]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2868 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Resmethrin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Resmethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.83 [5-(Phenylmethyl)–3- 

furanyl]methyl 2,2-dimethyl3-(2-methyl-1-propenyl) 

cyclopropanecarboxylate 

(Resmethrin) (CAS No. 

10453–86–8) (provided for 

in subheading 2932.19.10) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2868 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 1 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 2 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 3 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 4 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 5 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 6 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 7 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 8 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 9 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 10 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 11 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 12 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 13 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 14 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 15 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 16 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 17 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 18 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 19 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 20 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 21 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 22 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 23 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 24 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 25 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 26 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 27 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 28 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 29 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 30 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 31 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 32 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 33 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 34 of 35
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 11-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 35 of 35