alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order on Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(cX2) Page | of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Northern District of Florida

United States of America
v. Case No.: 1:90cr1020/MMP.

USM No.:
Anthony Lazier

Date of Original Judgment: February 22, 1991

Date of Previous Amended Judgment: May 6, 2008
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

Order on Motion for Sentence Reduction

CO The Defendant 1 Director of the Bureau of Prisons @ the court has moved
under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment previously imposed
based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive
by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u). Having considered
such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the
sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent they are applicable, the court
orders that the motion is:

C1 DENIED. & GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment.
(as reflected in the last judgment issued) Of ___324 _ months is reduced to 262.

(Complete Part I, HI or Ill of Attachment, as applicable)

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Order vax Machel Géall YW Goa
Signature of Judge U 2
M. Casey Rodgers
Effective Date: Chief United States District Judge
(if different from order date) Printed Name and Title of Judge

Rec'd] 10°71 1UsDeF ingPn0308
Gro
II 

Calendar No. 266 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 251 

[Report No. 109–165] 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of 

Reclamation, to conduct a water resource feasibility study for the Little 

Butte/Bear Creek Subbasins in Oregon. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2005 

Mr. SMITH (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

OCTOBER 27, 2005 

Reported by Mr. DOMENICI, with amendments 

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, acting through 

the Bureau of Reclamation, to conduct a water resource 

feasibility study for the Little Butte/Bear Creek Subbasins in Oregon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 251 RS 

1 SECTION 1. LITTLE BUTTE/BEAR CREEK SUBBASINS, OR2 EGON, WATER RESOURCE STUDY. 

3 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

4 ‘‘Little Butte/Bear Creek Subbasins Water Feasibility 

5 Act’’. 

6 (b) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the Interior, 

7 acting through the Bureau of Reclamation, may conduct 

8 participate in the Water for Irrigation, Streams and the 

9 Economy Project water management feasibility study and 

10 environmental impact statement in accordance with the 

11 ‘‘Memorandum of Agreement Between City of Medford 

12 and Bureau of Reclamation for the Water for Irrigation, 

13 Streams, and the Economy Project’’, dated July 2, 2004. 

14 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

15 authorized to be appropriated $500,000 to carry out this 

16 section. 

17 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be ap19 propriated to the Bureau of Reclamation $500,000 to 

20 carry out activities under this Act. 

21 (2) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.— 

22 (A) IN GENERAL.—The non-Federal share 

23 shall be 50 percent of the total costs of the Bu24 reau of Reclamation in carrying out subsection 

25 (b). 
3 

•S 251 RS 

1 (B) FORM.—The non-Federal share required 

2 under subparagraph (A) may be in the form of 

3 any in-kind services that the Secretary of the In4 terior determines would contribute substantially 

5 toward the conduct and completion of the study 

6 and environmental impact statement required 

7 under subsection (b). 
Calendar No. 266 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 251 

[Report No. 109–165] 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, acting 

Butte/Bear Creek Subbasins in Oregon. a water resource feasibility study for the Little through the Bureau of Reclamation, to conduct 

OCTOBER 27, 2005 

Reported with amendments
52.245-2 Government Property Installation

Operation Services.

As prescribed in 45.107(b), insert the following clause:

Government Property Installation Operation Services (Apr 2012)

(a) This Government Property listed in paragraph (e) of this clause is furnished to the Contractor in

an "as-is, where is" condition. The Government makes no warranty regarding the suitability for use

of the Government property specified in this contract. The Contractor shall be afforded the

opportunity to inspect the Government property as specified in the solicitation.

(b) The Government bears no responsibility for repair or replacement of any lost Government

property. If any or all of the Government property is lost or becomes no longer usable, the

Contractor shall be responsible for replacement of the property at Contractor expense. The

Contractor shall have title to all replacement property and shall continue to be responsible for

contract performance.

(c) Unless the Contracting Officer determines otherwise, the Government abandons all rights and

title to unserviceable and scrap property resulting from contract performance. Upon notification to

the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall remove such property from the Government premises

and dispose of it at Contractor expense.

(d) Except as provided in this clause, Government property furnished under this contract shall be

governed by the Government Property clause of this contract.

(e) Government property provided under this clause:

_________________________________________________________________________________

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.245 [Reserved]
52.215-5 Facsimile Proposals.

As prescribed in 15.209(e), insert the following provision:

Facsimile Proposals (Oct 1997)

(a) Definition. "Facsimile proposal," as used in this provision, means a proposal, revision or

modification of a proposal, or withdrawal of a proposal that is transmitted to and received by the

Government via facsimile machine.

(b) Offerors may submit facsimile proposals as responses to this solicitation. Facsimile proposals are

subject to the same rules as paper proposals.

(c) The telephone number of receiving facsimile equipment is:_____________ [insert telephone

number].

(d) If any portion of a facsimile proposal received by the Contracting Officer is unreadable to the

degree that conformance to the essential requirements of the solicitation cannot be ascertained from

the document-

(1) The Contracting Officer immediately shall notify the offeror and permit the offeror to resubmit

the proposal;

(2) The method and time for resubmission shall be prescribed by the Contracting Officer after

consultation with the offeror; and

(3) The resubmission shall be considered as if it were received at the date and time of the original

unreadable submission for the purpose of determining timeliness, provided the offeror complies with

the time and format requirements for resubmission prescribed by the Contracting Officer.

(e) The Government reserves the right to make award solely on the facsimile proposal. However, if

requested to do so by the Contracting Officer, the apparently successful offeror promptly shall

submit the complete original signed proposal.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.215 [Reserved]
§ 761.210 CL funds. ( a ) The following applicants and conservation projects will receive priority for CL funding: ( 1 ) Beginning farmer or socially disadvantaged farmer,
( 2 ) An applicant who will use the loan funds to convert to a sustainable or organic agriculture production system as evidenced by one of the following: ( i ) A conservation plan that states the applicant is moving toward a sustainable or organic production system, or
( ii ) An organic plan, approved by a certified agent and the State organic certification program, or
( iii ) A grant awarded by the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA.
( 3 ) An applicant who will use the loan funds to build conservation structures or establish conservation practices to comply with 16 U.S.C. 3812 (section 1212 of the Food Security Act of 1985) for highly erodible land.
( b ) [Reserved]
[75 FR 54013, Sept. 3, 2010]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 3:20-cr-60/MCR

BRYANT MARSH

_____________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of the 

Defendant, Bryant Marsh, to Counts One and Two of the indictment is hereby 

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this December 28, 2020. 

__/s/M. Casey Rodgers ___

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00060-MCR Document 41 Filed 12/28/20 Page 1 of 1
<Page>


                                                                      Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      This certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Berkshire Bancorp Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), and
is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. The undersigned, in my capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                              /s/ Steven Rosenberg
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Steven Rosenberg,
                                              Chief Executive Officer, President
                                              and Chief Financial Officer

                                              May 2, 2006

                                       36
§ 632.16 Methods of applying planned land use and treatment. ( a ) Land users may arrange to apply the planned land uses and conservation treatment specified in the contract by one or more of the following methods: ( 1 ) By performing the required treatment with his own labor and equipment.
( 2 ) By hiring a qualified contractor to install the required treatment.
( 3 ) By requesting NRCS to award and administer a contract to perform the required treatment in accordance with 41 CFR chapters I and IV.
( b ) State conservationists are to develop criteria specifying the conditions for which NRCS will award and administer a contract. Criteria will consider: Type of equipment required, type and amount of conservation treatment required, costs of the required reclamation, needs of the land user, and the applicable cost-share rate. If the Federal share is less than 100 percent, a land user must put up his estimated share of the cost before NRCS awards the contract.
Editorial Note on Part 47
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 64 FR 38108, July 15, 1999.

§ 47.25 Filing; extensions of time; effective date of filing; computations of time; official notice. ( a ) *Filing, number of copies.* Except as is provided otherwise herein, all documents or papers required or authorized by these rules to be filed with the Hearing Clerk shall be filed in triplicate: *Provided,* That, where there are more than two parties to the proceeding, a sufficient number of copies shall be filed so as to provide for service upon all the parties to the proceeding. Any document or paper required or authorized by the regulations in this part to be filed with the Hearing Clerk shall, during the course of an oral hearing, be filed with the examiner.
( b ) *Extensions of time.* The time for the filing of any document or paper (except an informal complaint) required or authorized under the regulations in this part to be filed may be extended by the examiner (before the transmittal of the record to the Secretary) or by the Secretary (after such transmittal), if, in the judgment of the examiner or the Secretary, as the case may be, there is good reason for the extension.
( c ) *Effective date of filing.* Any document or paper required or authorized under the regulations in this part to be filed shall be deemed to be filed when it reaches the Department in Washington, DC; or, if filed with any officer or employee of the Regulatory Branch of the Fruit and Vegetable Programs at any place outside the District of Columbia, it shall be deemed to be filed at the time when it is received by such officer or employee.
( d ) *Computations of time.* Saturdays, Sundays and holidays shall be included in computing the time allowed for the filing of any document or paper: Provided, That, when such time expires on a Saturday, Sunday or Federal holiday, such period shall be extended to include the next following business day.
( e ) *Official notice.* In any proceeding official notice may be taken of ( 1 ) such matters as are judicially noticed by the courts of the United States;
( 2 ) any other matter of technical, scientific, or commercial fact of established character; and
( 3 ) relevant publications and records of the Department.
[10 FR 2217, Feb. 27, 1945; 11 FR 224, Jan. 4, 1946, as amended at 24 FR 10055, Dec. 12, 1959; 56 FR 175, Jan. 3, 1991; 60 FR 8462, Feb. 14, 1995; 64 FR 38108, July 15, 1999]
#### § 58.215 Pre-heaters.

The pre-heaters shall be of stainless steel or other equally corrosion resistant material, cleanable, accessible for inspection and shall be equipped with suitable automatic temperature controls.
52.236-12 Cleaning Up.

As prescribed in 36.512 , insert the following clause:

Cleaning Up (Apr 1984)

The Contractor shall at all times keep the work area, including storage areas, free from

accumulations of waste materials. Before completing the work, the Contractor shall remove from the

work and premises any rubbish, tools, scaffolding, equipment, and materials that are not the

property of the Government. Upon completing the work, the Contractor shall leave the work area in

a clean, neat, and orderly condition satisfactory to the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.236 [Reserved]
Second Amendment to Exhibit A-5



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Confidential 
 Second Amendment to Exhibit A-5 to Master
Services Agreement 
 THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT A-5 IS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO, AND
SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THAT CERTAIN MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES DATED MAY 24, 2007, AS AMENDED (THE “AGREEMENT”). 
  

	 	1.	This Second Amendment to Exhibit A-5 to Master Services Agreement and the Scope of Works and Budgets attached hereto as Appendix 1 (the “Set-Up Plan”) , and the
Scope of Work and Budget attached hereto as Appendix 2 (the “Safety Plan”) (collectively, this “Second Amended Exhibit A-5”) sets forth the agreed to Services, fees, pass through costs and related compensation for Raifarm Limited
relating to commercialization set-up activities in Russia for Oncophage from April 1, 2008, and the pharmacovigilance and associated regulatory support for Oncophage in Russia. This Second Amended Exhibit A-5 hereby replaces the provisions of
the Amendment to Exhibit A-5 to Master Services Agreement entered into by the Parties on June 5, 2008 (“First Amended Exhibit A-5”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.


  

	 	2.	The Parties acknowledge that work for some of the tasks under Appendix 1 has already commenced, and some hours set forth in the Appendix 1 have already been utilized in performance
of the tasks. The Parties further acknowledge and agree that Company shall only be responsible to provide compensation to Raifarm Limited for hours actually utilized in performance of the Services, such hours and compensation not to exceed the
amounts set forth in Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 without the prior written consent of Company. 

  

	 	3.	The Parties acknowledge that the provisions of Paragraph 3 of the First Amended Exhibit A-5 is deleted in its entirety, and that the provisions of Paragraph 2 and 4 of the First
Amended Exhibit A-5 remain in full force and effect, provided however, that any payments to Raifarm after the Effective Date of this Second Amended Exhibit A-5 shall be payable by the Company in the form of U.S. dollars cash.


 Acknowledged and Agreed: 
  

							
	ANTIGENICS Inc., a Delaware corporation	  	RAIFARM LIMITED
				
	By:	 	 /s/ Garo Armen
	  	By:	 	 /s/ Yuri Raifeld

				
	Date:	 	 1/14/09
	  	Date:	 	 December 17, 2008

				
	Typed Name:	 	 Garo Armen
	  	Typed Name:	 	 Yuri Raifeld

				
	Title:	 	 Chairman & CEO
	  	Title:	 	 Director


 Appendix 1 
 [See attached Appendix 1 Set Up Plan] 








 Exhibit 10.2 
 Confidential 
  

 Appendix 1 
 [see
attached] 








 Exhibit 10.2 
 Confidential 
  

 Set-Up Plan [**] 
 [**]

  
 [**] = Portions of this agreement have
been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request. An unredacted version of this agreement has been filed separately with the Commission. 








 Exhibit 10.2 
 Confidential 
  

 Appendix 2 
 [**]

  
 [**] = Portions of this agreement have
been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request. An unredacted version of this agreement has been filed separately with the Commission.
#### § 52.1858 Grades of mixed types or varieties of raisins.

The grade of a lot of mixed types of processed raisins shall be the lower (or lowest) grade of any varietal type in the mixture based on the respective requirements for each type, except for moisture, in accordance with this subpart. Mixed types of processed raisins of U.S. Grade A, U.S. Grade B, or U.S. Grade C may contain not more than 18 percent, by weight, of moisture. Mixed types of processed raisins that as a mixture exceed 18 percent, by weight, of moisture are “Substandard.”
Exhibit 10.11.1

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CHEESECAKE FACTORY INCORPORATED

EXECUTIVE SAVINGS PLAN

As Amended and Restated November 7, 2016

 

This First Amendment to The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated Executive Savings Plan, as amended and restated November 7, 2016 (the “First Amendment”), is effective October 15, 2017.

 

A.  RECITALS

 

1. The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (“Company”) maintains an unfunded deferred compensation plan, entitled “The Cheesecake Factory Executive Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated November 7, 2016” (the “Plan”).

 

2. The Company now desires to amend the Plan in accordance with this First Amendment.

 

3.   Unless otherwise defined in this First Amendment, all capitalized terms herein shall have the meaning given such term in the Plan.

 

B.  AMENDMENT

 

I.     Section 1.2(j) of Exhibit B is hereby deleted and is replaced by the following new   Section 1.2(j):

 

“(j) Company shall mean (1) The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated and (2) any corporation or other entity (a) of which more than 50% of the outstanding voting stock or voting power is beneficially owned directly or indirectly by The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated, including Affiliates, and (b) is identified as a “Participating Employer” of the Plan on a schedule entitled “Employers Participating in TCFI Benefits” maintained by The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated’s Chief Financial Officer (the “Schedule”). However, for Change in Control purposes, only corporations shall be taken into account, and the more than 50% standard shall only be deemed satisfied if The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated directly or indirectly owns more than 50% of both the total fair market value and voting power of that corporation, as determined pursuant to Code Section 409A regulations.”

 

II.    A current version of the Schedule is attached to this First Amendment as Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 shall be deemed to be automatically amended to reflect any updates made by The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated’s Chief Financial Officer to the Schedule from time to time.

 

Except as herein modified, all other terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

 

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS IMMEDIATELY]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be effective as of the date stated above.

 

	
 
    	
The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   David Overton
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
David   Overton
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Its:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Chief   Executive Officer
    


 











 

Exhibit 1

Schedule of Employers Participating in TCFI Benefits

 

The list of employers has been omitted as not material and competitively harmful to The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated if disclosed. The list of employers will be provided as supplemental material to the Commission staff upon request.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0999 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-049-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
PD-0925-15

COA# 08-13-00138-CR

Dalton James Bennett, Jr.

a/k/a Dalton James Bennett v.

STYLE: The State of Texas

OFFENSE: 19.03

COUNTY: Tarrant

COA DISPOSITION: Modify/Affirm TRIAL COURT: 372nd District Court

DATE: 6/30/15 Publish: YES TCCASE#: 1244131D

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ELECTRONIC RECORD

Dalton James Bennett, Jr. a/k/a

Dalton James Bennett v. The

STYLE: State of Texas CCA#: PD-0925-15

MfftUAlrfi Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: ' ///Vi/Wr _Z

JUDGE: //fa Uytyu^n^

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR