alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 5:94cr05026LAC

RICHARD A. THOMAS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on August 21, 2006 

Motion/Pleadings MOTION PURSUANT TO FED. RULES CIVIL PROC. 60(b) IN 

CONJUNCTION WITH TITLE 5 U.S.C. 552(e)(5) 

Filed byDEFENDANT PRO SE on 8/7/06 Doc.# 300

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 22nd day of

August, 2006, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 5:94-cr-05026-LC-MD Document 301 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 1
52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations.       As prescribed in 32.706-3, insert the following clause:          Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations (Jun 2013)                                       (a) 						            Except as stated in paragraph (b) of this clause, when any supply or service acquired under this contract is subject to any End User License Agreement (EULA), Terms of Service (TOS), or similar legal instrument or agreement, that includes any clause requiring the Government to indemnify the Contractor or any person or entity for damages, costs, fees, or any other loss or liability that would create an Anti-Deficiency Act violation (31 U.S.C. 1341), the following shall govern:                                                         (1) 								                Any such clause is unenforceable against the Government.                                                            (2) 								                Neither the Government nor any Government authorized end user shall be deemed to have agreed to such clause by virtue of it appearing in the EULA, TOS, or similar legal instrument or agreement. If the EULA, TOS, or similar legal instrument or agreement is invoked through an "I agree" click box or other comparable mechanism (e.g., "click-wrap" or "browse-wrap" agreements), execution does not bind the Government or any Government authorized end user to such clause.                                                            (3) 								                Any such clause is deemed to be stricken from the EULA, TOS, or similar legal instrument or agreement.                                                                             (b) 						            Paragraph (a) of this clause does not apply to indemnification by the Government that is expressly authorized by statute and specifically authorized under applicable agency regulations and procedures.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.232 [Reserved]
52.216-9 Fixed Fee-Construction.       As prescribed in 16.307(c), insert the following clause:          Fixed Fee-Construction (Jun 2011)                                       (a) 						            The Government shall pay to the Contractor for performing this contract the fixed fee specified in the Schedule.                                          (b) 						            Payment of the fixed fee shall be made in installments based upon the percentage of completion of the work as determined from estimates submitted to and approved by the Contracting Officer, but subject to the withholding provisions of paragraph (c) of this section.                                          (c) 						            The Contracting Officer shall withhold a reserve not to exceed 15 percent of the total fixed fee or $100,000, whichever is less, to protect the Government’s interest. The Contracting Officer shall release 75 percent of all fee withholds under this contract after receipt of an adequate certified final indirect cost rate proposal covering the year of physical completion of this contract, provided the Contractor has satisfied all other contract terms and conditions, including the submission of the final patent and royalty reports, and is not delinquent in submitting final vouchers on prior years’ settlements. The Contracting Officer may release up to 90 percent of the fee withholds under this contract based on the Contractor’s past performance related to the submission and settlement of final indirect cost rate proposals.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.216 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 762

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 762 appear at 72 FR 63297, Nov. 8, 2007.

#### § 762.159 Pledging of guarantee.

A lender may pledge all or part of the guaranteed or unguaranteed portion of the loan as security to a Federal Home Loan Bank, a Federal Reserve Bank, a Farm Credit System Bank, or any other funding source determined acceptable by the Agency.

[70 FR 56107, Sept. 26, 2005]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2886 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Methidathion Technical. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 

Methidathion Technical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METHIDATHION TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.02 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Methidathion Technical) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2886 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
13.302-4 Termination or cancellation of

purchase orders.

(a) If a purchase order that has been accepted in writing by the contractor is to be terminated, the

contracting officer shall process the termination in accordance with-

(1) 12.403 and 52.212-4(l) or (m) for commercial products and commercial services; or

(2) part 49 or 52.213-4 for other than commercial products or commercial services.

(b) If a purchase order that has not been accepted in writing by the contractor is to be canceled, the

contracting officer shall notify the contractor in writing that the purchase order has been canceled,

request the contractor’s written acceptance of the cancellation, and proceed as follows:

(1) If the contractor accepts the cancellation and does not claim that costs were incurred as a result

of beginning performance under the purchase order, no further action is required (i.e., the purchase

order shall be considered canceled).

(2) If the contractor does not accept the cancellation or claims that costs were incurred as a result of

beginning performance under the purchase order, the contracting officer shall process the action as

a termination prescribed in paragraph (a) of this subsection.

Parent topic: 13.302 Purchase orders.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eye Care centers of America, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. McComas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                |  |  |  |                         |  | 
|--------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|August 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ David E. McComas    |  | 
|                |  |  |  | David E. McComas        |  | 
|                |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EYE CARE CENTERS OF
AMERICA, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

SELWYN KING,

Petitioner

v.

HONORABLE TINA P. GARTLEY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 29 MM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22 nd day of June , 2022, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the “Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Writ of Prohibition”

and the Application for an Immediate Hearing are DENIED

. T he Prothonotary is

DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption
52.236-16 Quantity Surveys.

As prescribed in 36.516 , the contracting officer may insert the following clause in solicitations and

contracts when a fixed-price construction contract providing for unit pricing of items and for

payment based on quantity surveys is contemplated:

Quantity Surveys (Apr 1984)

(a) Quantity surveys shall be conducted, and the data derived from these surveys shall be used in

computing the quantities of work performed and the actual construction completed and in place.

(b) The Government shall conduct the original and final surveys and make the computations based

on them. The Contractor shall conduct the surveys for any periods for which progress payments are

requested and shall make the computations based on these surveys. All surveys conducted by the

Contractor shall be conducted under the direction of a representative of the Contracting Officer,

unless the Contracting Officer waives this requirement in a specific instance.

(c) Promptly upon completing a survey, the Contractor shall furnish the originals of all field notes

and all other records relating to the survey or to the layout of the work to the Contracting Officer,

who shall use them as necessary to determine the amount of progress payments. The Contractor

shall retain copies of all such material furnished to the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

Alternate I (Apr 1984). If it is determined at a level above that of the Contracting Officer that it is

impracticable for Government personnel to perform the original and final surveys, and the

Government wishes the Contractor to perform these surveys, substitute the following paragraph (b)

for paragraph (b) of the basic clause:

(b) The Contractor shall conduct the original and final surveys and surveys for any periods for which

progress payments are requested. All these surveys shall be conducted under the direction of a

representative of the Contracting Officer, unless the Contracting Officer waives this requirement in

a specific instance. The Government shall make such computations as are necessary to determine

the quantities of work performed or finally in place. The Contractor shall make the computations

based on the surveys for any periods for which progress payments are requested.

Parent topic: 52.236 [Reserved]
215.404-74 Fee requirements for cost-plusaward-fee contracts.

In developing a fee objective for cost-plus-award-fee contracts, the contracting officer shall—

(a) Follow the guidance in FAR 16.405-2 and 216.405-2 ;

(b) Not use the weighted guidelines method or alternate structured approach;

(c) Apply the offset policy in 215.404-73 (b)(2) for facilities capital cost of money, i.e., reduce the

base fee by the amount of facilities capital cost of money; and

(d) Not complete a DD Form 1547.

Parent topic: 215.404 Proposal analysis.
#### § 58.240 Cooling dry products.

Prior to packaging and immediately following removal from the drying chamber the dry product shall be cooled to a temperature not exceeding 110 °F, however, if the product is to be held in a bulk bin the temperature should be reduced to approximately 90 °F but shall be not more than 110 °F.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 
**- 2141** 

PRINCE NAPHAZI ,
Petitioner ,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , Attorney General,
Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : May 18, 2011 Decided: June 14, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Alexander M. Chanthunya, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney G eneral, Anthony P. Nicastro, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jeffery R. Leist, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Prince Naphazi, a native and cit izen of Zimbabwe,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s
denial of his applications for relief from removal.
Naphazi first challenges the determination that he

failed to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal
of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien
“must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that
no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear
of persecutio n.” INS v. Elias

- Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483

- 84
(1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude
that Naphazi fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary
result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Naphazi cannot
meet the more string ent standard for withholding of removal.

Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v.

Cardoza

- Fonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2836 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2836

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain other work footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain other work footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN OTHER WORK FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.13.93      Other work          Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         footwear for                                                       31/2009
                         women, with outer
                         soles and uppers
                         of rubber or
                         plastics, other
                         than house
                         slippers and
                         other than tennis
                         shoes, basketball
                         shoes, gym shoes,
                         training shoes
                         and the like
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         6402.99.18)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2330 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2330

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain R-core 
                             transformers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 17, 2006

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain R-core 
                             transformers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN R-CORE TRANSFORMERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.85.04 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain R-core transformers) 
is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS-R9-IA-2010-N270; 96300-1671-0000-P5]
 AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
 ACTION: Notice of issuance of permits.
 SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), have issued the following permits to conduct certain activities with endangered species, marine mammals, or both. We issue these permits under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA).
 ADDRESSES: Brenda Tapia, Division of Management Authority, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 212, Arlington, VA 22203; fax (703) 558-7725; or e-mail 
                        *DMAFR@fws.gov.*
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Tapia, (703) 358-2104 (telephone); (703) 358-2280 (fax); 
                        *DMAFR@fws.gov*
                         (e-mail).


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On the dates below, as authorized by the provisions of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 
                    *et seq.*), as amended, and/or the MMPA, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 
                    *et seq.*), we issued requested permits subject to certain conditions set forth therein. For each permit for an endangered species, we found that (1) The application was filed in good faith, (2) The granted permit would not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species, and (3) The granted permit would be consistent with the purposes and policy set forth in section 2 of the ESA. Permit No.
Applicant
Receipt of application 
                            **Federal Register**
                             notice
Permit issuance date**Endangered Species**22557A
Anthony Clemenza
75 FR 62139; October 7, 2010
November 9, 2010.21605A
Steven Louis
75 FR 57977; September 23, 2010
November 8, 2010.23150A
Hector Bonilla
75 FR 62139; October, 7 2010
November 9, 2010.23152A
Kevin Slaughter
75 FR 62139; October 7, 2010
November 9, 2010.**Marine Mammals**107933
EcoHealth Alliance, Inc
75 FR 51284; August 19, 2010
November 19, 2010.
 
 
 Availability of Documents Documents and other information submitted with these applications are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written request for a copy of such documents. Dated: November 26, 2010. Brenda Tapia, Program Analyst/Data Administrator, Branch of Permits, Division of Management Authority.


[FR Doc. 2010-30380 Filed 12-2-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0791 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-026-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 58-1 Filed 09/26/22 Page 1 of 1