alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 766.112 Additional security for restructured loans. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 65044 , Aug. 8, 2024.
( a ) If the borrower is delinquent prior to restructuring, the borrower, and all entity members in the case of an entity, must execute and provide to the Agency a lien on all of their assets, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, when the Agency is servicing a loan.
( b ) The Agency will take the best lien obtainable on all assets the borrower owns, except: ( 1 ) When taking a lien on such property will prevent the borrower from obtaining credit from other sources;
( 2 ) When the property could have significant environmental problems or costs as described in subpart G of 7 CFR part 1940;
( 3 ) When the Agency cannot obtain a valid lien;
( 4 ) When the property is subsistence livestock, cash, special collateral accounts the borrower uses for the farming operation, retirement accounts, personal vehicles necessary for family living, household contents, or small equipment such as hand tools and lawn mowers; or
( 5 ) When a contractor holds title to a livestock or crop enterprise, or the borrower manages the enterprise under a share lease or share agreement.
Editorial Note
Editorial Note: At 81 FR 51285, Aug. 3, 2016, § 766.112, in paragraph (a)(6), the words “subpart G of 7 CFR part 1940” were removed and the words “part 799 of this chapter” were added in their place. However, paragraph (b)(3)(ii) does not exist, and this amendment could not be incorporated.
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 63 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 63 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 63 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### § 764.201 Down payment loan uses.

Down payment loan funds may be used to partially finance the purchase of a family farm by an eligible beginning farmer, socially disadvantaged farmer, or veteran farmer farmer.

[72 FR 63298, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 74345, Dec. 8, 2008; 86 FR 43392, Aug. 9, 2021; 87 FR 13124, Mar. 9, 2022]
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 37-2 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 37-2 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U. S. C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This certification is intended to
accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Berkshire Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  The undersigned, in my
capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies to the best of my knowledge
that:





(1)The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Steven RosenbergSteven
      Rosenberg,Chief
      Executive Officer, Presidentand
      Chief Financial OfficerNovember
      12, 2009
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

STEVEN H. BEASLEY, 

Plaintiff,

vs. 5:02cv129-MMP/WCS

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner

Social Security Administration,

Defendants.

__________________________________/ 

O R D E R

This cause is before the court upon Defendant’s status report. Docs. 58. 

Defendant advises that the Appeals Council is still considering Plaintiff’s exceptions. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendant shall file a notice by September

9, 2005, advising the Court the status of the administrative proceedings on remand. 

DONE AND ORDERED on August 9, 2005.

s/ William C. Sherrrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:02-cv-00129-MP-WCS Document 59 Filed 08/09/05 Page 1 of 1
# 52.229-5 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.229 [Reserved]
a5961038-ex101.htm


    Exhibit
10.1

    


    


    


    DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

    


    Effective
January 1, 2009 and until further modified by the Board, our non-employee
directors receive the compensation set forth below.  Non-employee
directors do not receive any other compensation for service on the Board of
Directors or its committees, other than reimbursement of reasonable expenses.
Directors who are also employees of the Company do not receive any additional
compensation for their service on the Board of Directors.  All equity
awards are granted under our 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, as
amended.

    


    
      
        
          	
                  Upon
      initial election to the Board of Directors (one-time
grant)

                	
                  A
      stock option award to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock.
      (1)

                
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                  An
      award of 20,000 shares of common stock, pro-rated for the number of
      calendar quarters remaining in the year. (2)

                
	 
      	 
      
	
                  Annually

                	
                  An
      award of 20,000 shares of restricted stock or 20,000 restricted stock
      units, as elected by each director in his or her discretion, in January of
      each year for service that year. (2) (3)

                
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                  A
      cash retainer of $25,000, paid quarterly in arrears for ongoing service to
      the Board and pro-rated for any partial year of
service.

                
	 
      	 
      
	
                  Upon
      the 10th
      and 15th
      anniversary of service on the Board of Directors

                	
                  A
      stock option award to purchase 20,000 shares and 25,000 shares of common
      stock, respectively. (1)

                
	 
      	 
      


        

      

    

    


    (1)  Stock
options vest one-third on each anniversary of the award date while the director
remains in service with us.  The exercise price is the closing price
of our common stock as quoted on The NASDAQ Global Market on the date of
grant.  This award has a term of ten years subject to earlier
termination.

    


    (2)  Awards
of common stock, restricted stock and restricted stock units are fully-vested on
the date of grant and are not subject to repurchase by the Company.

    


    (3)   Directors
may select future payment dates for the shares issued upon the settlement of
restricted stock units, subject to compliance with Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

    
 

     

    30
§ 760.116 Miscellaneous. ( a ) As a condition to receive benefits under ELAP, LFP, LIP, SURE, or TAP, a participant must have been in compliance with the provisions of parts 12 and 718 of this title, and must not otherwise be precluded from receiving benefits under those provisions or under any law.
( b ) Rules of the Commodity Credit Corporation that are cited in this part will be applied to this subpart in the same manner as if the programs covered in this subpart were programs funded by the Commodity Credit Corporation.
EX-35 (c)
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

DBALT 2006-AR4


I, Michael De Francesco, an authorized officer of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding,
Inc. (the "Servicer"), certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2006 through and including December 31, 2006 (or applicable portion
thereof) and of the Servicer's performance under the applicable servicing
agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in
all material respects throughout such period.

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to
them in the Agreement.

Date: February 28, 2007

/s/ Michael De Francesco
Michael De Francesco
Senior Vice President, Loan Administration
#### § 51.2658 Permanent defects.

*Permanent defects* means defects which are not subject to change during shipping or storage; including, but not limited to factors of shape, scarring, skin breaks, injury caused by hail or insects, and mechanical injury which is so located as to indicate that it occurred prior to shipment.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Case No: 2:06-cr-178-SRW 

 ) 

CARRIE J. FLOWERS ) 

UNITED STATES' REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTIONS

 Comes now the United States of America, by and through LEURA CANARY, United 

States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and requests this Court to instruct the jury 

with the attached instruction in addition to the standard jury instructions. 

 Respectfully submitted this 5th day of March, 2007. 

 LEURA CANARY 

 United States Attorney 

 s/Aaron Drake 

 AARON DRAKE 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 42 ABW/JA 

50 LeMay Plaza South 

Maxwell AFB, Alabama 36112-6334 

 (334) 953-2786 

Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 15 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 1 of 3
THEFT OF GOVERNMENT MONEY OR PROPERTY

18 USC 641 

 Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, makes it a Federal crime or offense for anyone 

to steal any money or property belonging to the United States having a value of less than $1000. 

 The defendant can be found guilty of that offense only if all of the following facts are 

proved beyond a reasonable doubt: 

First: That the property described in the indictment belonged to the 

 United States at the time alleged; 

Second: That the Defendant stole or converted such property to her 

 own use; and 

Third: That the Defendant did so knowingly and willfully with the intent to 

 deprive the United States of the use or benefit of the property so taken. 

 It is not necessary to prove that the Defendant knew that the government owned the 

property at the time of the wrongful taking so long as it is established, beyond a reasonable 

doubt, that the government did in fact own the property involved and that the Defendant 

knowingly and willfully stole it. 

GIVEN _________________________ REFUSED ____________________________ 

Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 15 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

UNITED STATES v. CARRIE J. FLOWERS 

 I hereby certify that on March 3, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing Requested Jury 

Instructions with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification 

of such filing to counsel of record. 

/s Aaron Drake

 AARON DRAKE 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 42 ABW/JA 

50 LeMay Plaza South 

Maxwell AFB, Alabama 36112-6334 

 (334) 953-2786 

Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 15 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### § 610.21 Purpose and scope.

This subpart sets forth the procedures for establishing and using the advice of State Technical Committees. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) will establish in each State a Technical Committee to assist in making recommendations relating to the implementation and technical aspects of natural resource conservation activities and programs. The Department of Agriculture (USDA) will use State Technical Committees in an advisory capacity in the administration of certain conservation programs and initiatives. Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 3862(d), these State Technical Committees and Local Working Groups are exempt from the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2).
228.311-1 Contract clause.

Use the clause at FAR 52.228-7, Insurance—Liability to Third Persons, in solicitations and contracts,

other than those for construction and those for architect-engineer services, when a costreimbursement contract is contemplated, unless the head of the contracting activity waives the

requirement for use of the clause.

Parent topic: 228.311 Solicitation provision and contract clause on liability insurance under costreimbursement contracts.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLUS, INCORPORATED FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
NOVEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,438
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  523,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               472,256
<PP&E>                                         152,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 745,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          222,703
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    466,600
<COMMON>                                        40,328
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   745,526
<SALES>                                        221,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               229,253
<CGS>                                          210,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  210,476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,706
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,023
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,929)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,929)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,929)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### CRANFORD v. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Action by Charles Cranford against the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1111.
52.243-6 Change Order Accounting.       As prescribed in 43.205(f), the contracting officer may insert a clause, substantially the same as follows:          Change Order Accounting (Apr 1984)          The Contracting Officer may require change order accounting whenever the estimated cost of a change or series of related changes exceeds $100,000. The Contractor, for each change or series of related changes, shall maintain separate accounts, by job order or other suitable accounting procedure, of all incurred segregable, direct costs (less allocable credits) of work, both changed and not changed, allocable to the change. The Contractor shall maintain such accounts until the parties agree to an equitable adjustment for the changes ordered by the Contracting Officer or the matter is conclusively disposed of in accordance with the Disputes clause.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.243 [Reserved]
52.237-5 Payment by Contractor to

Government.

As prescribed in 37.304(b), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for dismantling,

demolition, or removal of improvements whenever the contractor is to receive title to dismantled or

demolished property and a net amount of compensation is due to the Government, except if the

contracting officer determines that it would be advantageous to the Government for the contractor

to pay in increments and the Government to transfer title to the contractor for increments of

property only upon receipt of those payments:

Payment by Contractor to Government (Apr 1984)

(a) The Contractor shall receive title to all property to be dismantled, demolished, or removed under

this contract and not specifically designated in the Schedule as being retained by the Government.

The title shall vest in the Contractor immediately upon the Government’s issuing the notice of

award, or if a performance bond is to be furnished, upon the Government’s issuing a notice to

proceed with the work. The Government shall not be responsible for the condition of, or any loss or

damage to, the property.

(b) The Contractor shall promptly remove from the site all property acquired by the Contractor. The

Government shall not permit storage of property on the site beyond the completion date. If the

Contractor does not wish to remove from the site any of the property acquired, the Contracting

Officer may, upon written request, grant the Contractor permission to leave the property on the

premises. As a condition of the granting of the permission, the Contractor agrees to waive any right,

title, claim, or interest in and to the property.

(c) The Contractor shall perform the work called for under this contract and within ________ days of

receipt of notice of award, unless otherwise provided in the Schedule and before proceeding with

the work, shall pay _________ [fill in amount]. Checks shall be made payable to the office designated

in the contract and shall be forwarded to the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.237 [Reserved]
# L_2014198DE.01001401.xml

| 5.7.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 198/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 198/14

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 166/2014 der Kommission vom 17. Februar 2014 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 798/2008 hinsichtlich der Bescheinigungsanforderungen für die Einfuhr von Fleisch von Nutzlaufvögeln für den menschlichen Verzehr in die Union und der Einträge für Israel und Südafrika in der Liste der Drittländer und Drittlandsgebiete

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 54 vom 22. Februar 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 54 vom 22. Februar 2014

Auf Seite 4, im Anhang zur Änderung des Anhangs I Teil 1 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 798/2008:

in Nummer 1 Buchstabe b Spalte 4 Zeile 5:

anstatt:

„BET“

muss es heißen:

„HER“;

auf Seite 4, im Anhang zur Änderung des Anhangs I Teil 1 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 798/2008:

in Nummer 1 Buchstabe b Spalte 5 Zeile 5:

anstatt:

„DIV. III“

muss es heißen:

„III“.

---
161 So.2d 277

#### John W. CRUTHIRDS v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY.

No. 47145.

March 11, 1964.

In re: John W. Cruthirds applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 159 So.2d 586.

Writ refused. No rehearing was applied for by applicant herein in the Court of Appeal. See State v. Moore, 175 La. 607, 143 So. 707 and Rule XII, Sec. 5(7) of this Court, 8 LSA-R.S.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-618-MEF 

) (WO)

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., )

 )

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This cause is before the Court on the Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Doc.

# 38) filed on May 25, 2007 by Plaintiff Harold Kelly Murphy (“Murphy”). In this motion,

Murphy seeks to amend his complaint so as “to clarify the factual grounds of his claim and

to demonstrate the inapplicability of Defendant’s affirmative defense of federal preemption.”

Doc. # 38 at 2. Defendant Southern Energy Homes, Inc. (“Southern Energy”) strenuously

objects. For the reasons set forth below, this Court finds that this motion is due to be denied.

Murphy makes his motion for leave to amend pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 15(a). While Rule 15(a) commands that “leave [to amend] shall be freely given

when justice so requires,” that rule is inapposite here as the instant motion for leave to amend

comes well after the deadline set by the Court in its Uniform Scheduling Order. See Doc.

# 11) (setting November 6, 2006 as the deadline for filing any motions to amend the

pleadings and to add parties). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) provides that a

schedule, such as the ones this Court set by entering the Uniform Scheduling Orders in this

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 52 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

case, “shall not be modified except upon a showing of good cause” and by leave of court.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) (emphasis added). This means that in making a motion for leave to

amend a pleading after the deadline set by this Court’sscheduling order, Plaintiffs must show

good cause exists for their untimely attempt to amend his Answer. See Sosa v. Airprint Sys.,

Inc., 133 F.3d 1417, 1419 (11th Cir. 1998) (applying the Rule 16 good cause standard rather

than the more liberal standard of Rule 15 to attempt to amend pleading after deadline set by

Court’s scheduling order is appropriate). 

Although Southern Energy first raised the issue of federal preemption after the

deadline for motions to amend the pleadings had already passed, Murphy waited over six

months to file his motion. Murphy has not demonstrated good cause to modify the schedule

and there is no basis for this Court not to enforce the deadline as set forth in its Uniform

Scheduling Order. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Amend

Complaint (Doc. # 38) is DENIED. 

In light of this ruling, it is further ORDERED as follows:

(1) The Motion to Amend Internal Deadlines in Scheduling Order (Doc. # 51) is

DENIED.

(2) The parties shall confer and, on or before July 27, 2007, file an amended Rule

26(f) which submits proposed changes to the Uniform Scheduling Order relating to deadlines

for discovery, expert witnesses, dispositive motions, and the trial date. 

DONE this the 18 day of July, 2007. 

th

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 52 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 16 of 16