alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 75.33 Suspension or revocation of license of inspector.

Pending final action by the Administrator, the Director may suspend, whenever it is deemed that such action is necessary to assure that any service provided is performed properly, the license of any inspector, issued pursuant to the regulations by giving notice of such suspension to the respective licensee, accompanied by a statement of the reasons therefore. Within 7 days after receipt of notice and statement of reasons by a licensee, an appeal may be filed in writing with the Administrator supported by any argument or evidence as to why the license should not be suspended. After expiration of the 7-day period and consideration of such argument and evidence, the Administrator shall take such action as deemed appropriate with respect to a suspension or revocation.
Case 3:20-cr-00099-MCR Document 46 Filed 08/31/21 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00099-MCR Document 46 Filed 08/31/21 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00099-MCR Document 46 Filed 08/31/21 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00099-MCR Document 46 Filed 08/31/21 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00099-MCR Document 46 Filed 08/31/21 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00099-MCR Document 46 Filed 08/31/21 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00099-MCR Document 46 Filed 08/31/21 Page 7 of 7
#### Manuel Arons, Respondent, v Robert Jutkowitz et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Submitted September 4, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 37 AD3d 94.

Motion by New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                   QUIPP, INC.

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
          REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
                       OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


I,   Michael S. Kady, Chief Executive Officer of Quipp, Inc., a Florida
     corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

         (1)      The Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
                  December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                      * * *




MICHAEL S. KADY
--------------------------
Michael S. Kady
Chief Executive Officer

Date:    March 29, 2006
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00225

- CR

Mario Vargas v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15CR1917

- G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cau se on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
November 19 , 2020
#### § 62.204 Authority to request service.

Any person requesting service may be required to prove his/her financial interest in the product or service at the discretion of USDA.
§ 636.17 Compliance with regulatory measures. ( a ) Participants who implement the WHIP plan of operations will be responsible for obtaining the authorities, rights, easements, permits, or other approvals necessary for the implementation, operation, and maintenance of the conservation activities in keeping with applicable laws and regulations. The requirement for the participant to obtain necessary permits is included in the terms and conditions of the contract appendix.
( b ) Participants will be responsible for compliance with all laws and for all effects or actions resulting from the participants' performance under the cost-share agreement.
#### The People, ex rel. Ernest Drevet, Respondent, *v.*The Board of Fire Commissioners of the City of New York, Appellant.

(Argued June 18, 1884;

decided June 27, 1884.)

*D. J. Dean*for appellant.

*Douglas A. Levien, Jr.,*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.
10-Q












Exhibit 10.1  


Summary of Directors Ongoing Compensation 




Subject to a temporary reduction of
November 2008, as more fully set forth below, as of March 31, 2009, our non-executive
officer directors receive cash compensation as follows:  





	 	—	Annual
compensation of $10,000;






	 	—	Meeting
participation fee of $750 per in-person meeting; and






	 	—	For
meeting participation by telephone, $350 per meeting. 








If the compensation is paid in New
Israeli Shekels (“NIS”), the exchange rate of the directors’ fees used to
calculate the fees will be not less then $4.25 per NIS. In addition, we reimburse our
non-executive officer directors for expenses incurred in connection with attending board
meetings.

 As of November 2008 there was a reduction of approximately 25% of the directors’ cash
compensation in effect for a period of six months (in exchange for the reduction the
directors were granted restricted shares of the company’s common stock with an
attributed value of $0.40 per share and a vesting period of six months).
| **National Center    for     Health Statistics            Division of Data     Services            6525 Belcrest Road     Hyattsville, MD     20782-2003     (301)458-4636      **

 **Publications and    Information ProductsPublications and Products Home | Search NCHS | Contact    us**
**Guam**

**Event:** Birth or death

**Cost of copy:** $5.00 

**Address:**    Office of Vital Statistics    Department of Public Health and Social Services    Government of Guam    P.O. Box 2816    Agana, GU, M.I. 96910 

**Remarks:** Office has had    records since October 16, 1901.

Money order should be made payable to **Treasurer    of Guam**. Personal checks are not accepted. To verify current fees, the telephone    number is **(671) 734-4589**. 

**Event:** Marriage 

**Cost of copy:** $5.00 

**Address:**    Office of Vital Statistics    Department of Public Health and Social Services    Government of Guam    P.O. Box 2816    Agana, GU, M.I. 96910 

**Event:** Divorce 

**Cost of copy:** Varies 

**Address:**    Clerk, Superior Court of Guam    Agana, GU, M.I. 96910 
**Publications and Products Home | Search NCHS | Contact    us**
**CDC Home | Search    | Health Topics A-Z**
This page last reviewed August 25, 2000

**U.S.    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES****Centers    for Disease Control and Prevention**    National Center for Health Statistics    Division of Data Services     Hyattsville, MD    20782-2003    (301) 458-4636
 

  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
52.246-5 Inspection of Services-CostReimbursement.

As prescribed in 46.305 , insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for services, or

supplies that involve the furnishing of services, when a cost-reimbursement contract is

contemplated:

Inspection of Services-Cost-Reimbursement (Apr 1984)

(a) Definition."Services," as used in this clause, includes services performed, workmanship, and

material furnished or used in performing services.

(b) The Contractor shall provide and maintain an inspection system acceptable to the Government

covering the services under this contract. Complete records of all inspection work performed by the

Contractor shall be maintained and made available to the Government during contract performance

and for as long afterwards as the contract requires.

(c) The Government has the right to inspect and test all services called for by the contract, to the

extent practicable at all places and times during the term of the contract. The Government shall

perform inspections and tests in a manner that will not unduly delay the work.

(d) If any of the services performed do not conform with contract requirements, the Government

may require the Contractor to perform the services again in conformity with contract requirements,

for no additional fee. When the defects in services cannot be corrected by reperformance, the

Government may-

(1) Require the Contractor to take necessary action to ensure that future performance conforms to

contract requirements; and

(2) Reduce any fee payable under the contract to reflect the reduced value of the services

performed.

(e) If the Contractor fails to promptly perform the services again or take the action necessary to

ensure future performance in conformity with contract requirements, the Government may-

(1) By contract or otherwise, perform the services and reduce any fee payable by an amount that is

equitable under the circumstances; or

(2) Terminate the contract for default.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.246 [Reserved]
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 181 Filed 04/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-8 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-8 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-8 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-8 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 4 of 4
#### § 550.105 Duration.

REE Agencies may enter into non-assistance cooperative agreements for a period not to exceed five years. (7 U.S.C. 3318(c)).
#### § 631.5 Land user eligibility.

Any land user in a designated county may file an application for participation in the GPCP with the NRCS field office. A land user who develops an acceptable conservation plan in cooperation with NRCS and the conservation district that is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the program is eligible to sign a contract.
# L_2014295EN.01005801.xml

| 11.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 295/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 295/58

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 8 October 2014

appointing a United Kingdom member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2014/706/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the United KingdomGovernment,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1).

| (2) | A member's seaton the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Richard BALFE, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seaton the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Richard BALFE,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Lynne FAULKNER is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 8 October 2014.

For the Council

The President

M. LUPI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.

1

---
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal 

revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound 

volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical 

error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of 

Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 

Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557-

1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us

SJC-13404

EMMETT S. MULDOON vs. COMMONWEALTH.

May 28, 2024.

Supreme Judicial Court, Superintendence of inferior courts.

The petitioner, Emmett S. Muldoon, appeals from a judgment 

of the county court denying, without a hearing, his petition for 

relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. The petitioner pleaded guilty 

to aggravated rape and other offenses in 1996. In 2014, he 

moved for a new trial. A judge of the Superior Court denied 

that motion; the Appeals Court affirmed in an unpublished 

decision, Commonwealth v. Muldoon, 93 Mass. App. Ct. 1116 

(2018); and we denied further appellate review, 480 Mass. 1108 

(2018). He thereafter filed motions in this court seeking 

reconsideration of the denial of further appellate review or 

leave to file a second application for further appellate review. 

We denied those motions.1 The petitioner's G. L. c. 211, § 3, 

petition sought relief from those rulings. By the plain 

language of G. L. c. 211, § 3, however, this court's 

extraordinary superintendence power extends only to "courts of 

1 To the extent the petitioner suggested in his petition 

that the court was required under the Americans with 

Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 et seq., to consider 

his request to file a second or successive application for 

further appellate review as an accommodation for certain 

disabilities, we disagree. Here, the petitioner did not seek an 

equal opportunity to argue for further appellate review; rather, 

he sought greater opportunities than are available to 

others. Such an accommodation is not required.
2

inferior jurisdiction" (emphasis added). The single justice

thus had no authority to review a decision of the full court. 

Moreover, the power conferred by G. L. c. 211, § 3, does not 

"provide an additional layer of appellate review after the 

normal process has run its course." Votta v. Police Dep't of 

Billerica, 444 Mass. 1001, 1001 (2005). The petitioner has had 

all the review to which he is entitled as to the denial of his 

motion for a new trial. The single justice neither abused his 

discretion nor committed other error of law by denying

extraordinary relief.

Judgment affirmed.

The case was submitted on briefs.

Emmett S. Muldoon, pro se.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

KIM LAFLEUR,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:04-cv-00007-MP-AK

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 

a foreign corporation, and

DUNLOP TIRE CORPORATION 

a dissolved corporation

Defendants.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 86, the Joint Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice

with regard to Dunlop Tire Corporation, and Doc. 87, Joint Stipulation For Dismissal with

Prejudice with regard to Ford Motor Company. In these motions, the parties indicate that they

have resolved all issues between them and jointly request an order dismissing this case with

prejudice. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED the claims against Dunlop Tire Corporation and Defendant

Ford Motor Company are dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs,

expenses and attorney’s fees. If any party desires for the Court to retain jurisdiction to ensure

that settlement is effected, the party must so inform the Court in writing by Friday, May 13,

2005.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of May, 2005

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:04-cv-00007-MP-AK Document 88 Filed 05/03/05 Page 1 of 1
# L_2013235EN.01000101.xml

| 4.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 235/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 235/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 850/2013

of 23 August 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pastel de Tentúgal (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Portugal’s application to register the name ‘Pastel de Tentúgal’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Portugal’s application to register the name ‘Pastel de Tentúgal’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pastel de Tentúgal’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pastel de Tentúgal’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 August 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Connie HEDEGAARD

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 302, 6.10.2012, p. 31.

3

---

ANNEX

Foodstuffs listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012:

Class 2.4.   Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker’s wares

PORTUGAL

Pastel de Tentúgal (PGI)

---
Case 1:97-cr-00013-MW-GRJ   Document 1310   Filed 03/28/06   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eye Care centers of America, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. McComas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|November 14, 2006 |  |                        
|                  | 
|                  |  | /s/ David E. McComas   
|                  |  | David E. McComas       
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EYE CARE CENTERS OF
AMERICA, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
§ 718.102 Acreage reports. ( a ) In order to be eligible for benefits, participants in the programs specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(6) of this section must submit accurate information annually as required by these provisions.
( b ) ( 1 ) Participants in programs for which eligibility for benefits is tied to base acres must report the acreage of fruits and vegetables planted for harvest on a farm enrolled in such program;
( 2 ) Participants in the programs governed by parts 1421 and 1427 of this title must report the acreage planted to a commodity for harvest for which a marketing assistance loan or loan deficiency payment is requested;
( 3 ) Participants in the programs governed by part 1410 of this title must report the intended use of land enrolled in such programs;
( 4 ) All participants in the programs governed by part 1437 of this title must report all acreage and intended use of the eligible crop in the country in which the producer has a share;
( 5 ) Participants in the programs governed by part 723 of this chapter and part 1464 of this title must report the acreage planted to tobacco by kind on all farms that have an effective allotment or quota greater than zero;
( 6 ) All participants in the programs governed by parts 1412, 1421, and 1427 of this title must report the use of all cropland on the farm.
( 7 ) All producers reporting acreage as prevented planted acreage or failed acreage must provide documentation that meets the provisions of § 718.103 to the FSA county office where the farm is administered.
( c ) The annual acreage reports required in paragraph (a) of this section must be filed with the county committee by the farm operator, farm owner, producer of the crop on the farm, or duly authorized representative by the final reporting date applicable to the crop as established by the Deputy Administrator.
( d ) Participants in programs to which this part is applicable must report all crops, in all counties, in which they have an interest. This includes crops on cropland and noncropland, including native or improved grass that will be hayed or grazed.
[68 FR 16176, Apr. 3, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 13741, Mar. 17, 2006; 79 FR 74571, Dec. 15, 2014; 80 FR 41995, July 16, 2015]
#### § 66.300 Scope.

This subpart applies to records regarding mandatory and voluntary disclosures under this part for foods offered for retail sale in the United States.