alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Laloni C. Patterson, Appellant.

Submitted September 24, 2007;

decided October 11, 2007

Reported below, 34 AD3d 1349.

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 denied as unnecessary and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

Part 201 - FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM

Part 202 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

Part 203 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

Part 204 - ADMINISTRATIVE AND INFORMATION MATTERS

Part 205 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

Parent topic: Subchapter A - GENERAL
From: Jennifer Frender

To: Marie Mattox; Marlene Narro; Emerson Flowers; Kristen Burke

Cc: Jennifer Hawkins; Tim Warner

Subject: SERVICE OF COURT DOCUMENT: Robert Gene Wells v. Tommy Ford et. al 5:21:-cv-00019-TKW-MJF

Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 6:24:00 PM

Attachments: Rule 11.pdf

Court Identity: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Case No. 5:19-cv-00019-TKW-MJF

Initial parties - Plaintiff(s): Robert Gene Wells

Initial parties - Defendant(s): Tommy Ford, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Bay County, and Rick

Anglin, in his supervisor capacity

Document(s) being served: Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure

Please see attached.

Jennifer Frender

Legal Assistant

WARNER LAW FIRM, P.A.

Post Office Box 1820

Panama City, FL 32402

Telephone: (850) 784-7772

Facsimile: (850) 784-7756

Email: jenniferfrender@warnerlaw.us

LEGAL NOTICE

This communication and any attachments thereto, constitute an "electronic communication" within the meaning of the

Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.A. §2510, and disclosure of these contents is limited to the recipient(s)

intended by the sender of this messages. Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message and any documents accompanying

this Email transmission are confidential and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege or deemed work product

documents. The Sender's expectation of privacy regarding the content of this e-mail message and any documents

accompanying this transmission is extremely high. This message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If the reader of this

message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this in error and any review,

dissemination, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this email, or any action taken or not taken in reliance on it, is strictly unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee,

please destroy the message and inform the sender immediately at the number, address or Email address listed above. The

receipt of our fax number above is not to be construed as the firm's consent to receive unsolicited fax advertisements and this

e-mail does not create an Existing Business Relationship (EBR).

Case 5:21-cv-00019-TKW-MJF Document 76-2 Filed 08/29/22 Page 1 of 1
#### Ever S. Benitez, Also Known as Ebert S. Benitez, Appellant-Respondent, v Diane Olson, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, et al., Defendants. National Waste Disposal Corp. et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

[813 NYS2d 673]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated March 1, 2005, which granted the motion of the third-party defendants/second third-party defendants for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaints, and the defendant third-party plaintiff separately appeals from the same order.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal by the plaintiff must be dismissed as he is not aggrieved by the order *(see*CPLR 5511; *Gwyn v 575 Fifth Ave. Assoc.,*12 AD3d 403, 404 [2004]; *Bentzinger v Host Marriot Corp.,*6 AD3d 562 [2004]; *Johnson v Leach Co.,*5 AD3d 735 [2004]).

The separate appeal by the defendant third-party plaintiff must be dismissed as she did not submit papers in opposition to the underlying motion which resulted in the order appealed from. No appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party *(see*CPLR 5511; *Viggiani v Grodotzke,*306 AD2d 273, 274 [2003]). Miller, J.P., Spolzino, Lifson and Dillon, JJ., concur.
**ANNUAL
      STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**





**SACO
      I Trust 2006-8**





**2006**







The
      undersigned, an authorized officer of LaSalle Bank National Association
      (“LBNA”), hereby certifies as follows:





1.  I
      have
      made, or caused to be made under my supervision, a review of the master
      servicing activities of LBNA during the preceding calendar year ending 2006,
      and
      its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated September 15,
      2006
      (the “Agreement”) for SACO I Trust, Series 2006-8.





2.  To
      the best
      of my knowledge, based on such review, LBNA has, without exception, fulfilled
      all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout
      the preceding calendar year ending 2006.





In
      witness whereof, I the undersigned have executed this Annual Statement of
      Compliance on this 7 th day of
      March, 2007.








LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Master Servicer







By:
      /s/ Andrew Leszczynski




Name:
      Andrew Leszczynski


Title:
      First Vice President
#### § 503.9 Soliciting, vending, debt collection, and distribution of handbills.

The soliciting of alms and contributions, commercial soliciting and vending of all kinds, the display or distribution of commercial advertising, or the collecting of private debts, in or on PIADC is prohibited. This section does not apply to national or local drives for funds for welfare, health, and other purposes, sponsored or approved by the PIADC, or concessions or personal notices posted by employees on authorized bulletin boards. Unauthorized distribution of materials such as pamphlets, handbills, and flyers is prohibited.
§ 75.23 Issuance of inspection certificate. After an inspection has been completed, an inspection certificate shall be issued showing the results of the inspection in accordance with paragraph (a) or (b) of this section. ( a ) *Lot inspection certificate.* A lot inspection certificate shall be issued to include the name of the inspector sampling and sealing the seed lot, the analysis results from testing the sample, the identifying mark or number which has been approved by the inspector to appear on each container in the seed lot, and any other factual information pertinent to the inspection.
( b ) *Sample inspection certificate.* A sample inspection certificate shall be issued to show the results of the inspection of a sample of seed or grain submitted by an interested party. Each sample inspection certificate shall state the results of the inspection that applies only to the sample described in the certificate.
( c ) *General authorization to issue certificates.* Certificates for inspections may be issued by any inspector authorized by the Director to perform the inspection covered by the certificate.
( d ) *Name requirements.* The name and signature of the person who issued the inspection certificate shall be shown on the certificate. The original certificate must be signed, and the signature or a stamped facsimile shall be shown on each copy.
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 5:94cr5004 LAC

ALPHONSE GAINER

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on MAY 16, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF COURT’S MOTION (Doc #146

& Order #147) TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 USC § 3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT ATTORNEY on 5/9/08 Doc.# 148

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 19

th day of

May, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 5:94-cr-05004-LC-MD Document 150 Filed 05/19/08 Page 1 of 1
52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated by Reference.       As prescribed in 52.107(b), insert the following clause:          Clauses Incorporated By Reference (Feb 1998)          This contract incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):          _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ [*Insert one or more Internet addresses*]          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.252 [Reserved]
#### § 51.771 Fairly well colored.

*Fairly well colored* means that except for an aggregate area of green color which does not exceed the area of a circle 1 inch (25.4 mm) in diameter, the characteristic color predominates over the green color.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.26
PHILANTHROPY AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) between Chemical Financial Corporation (“Chemical” ) and David T. Provost (the “Executive”) is entered into as of February 27, 2018.
WHEREAS, Executive currently serves as Chemical’s Chief Executive Officer, President and member of Chemical’s Board of Directors (the “Board”); and
WHEREAS, Chemical recognizes Executive’s long and distinguished history of strong philanthropy to the community that Chemical serves; and
WHEREAS, in the event Executive’s employment with Chemical and services on Chemical’s Board are terminated and Executive receives a cash severance benefit in connection with his separation from service,  Chemical desires to make the charitable contribution described below in recognition of Executive’s extraordinary philanthropy to the community;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, Chemical agrees as follows:
If, Executive’s services to Chemical are involuntarily terminated Without Cause or for Good Reason, both as defined in the employment agreement between Chemical and Executive in effect at such time (the “Employment Agreement”), Chemical, in recognition of Executive’s voluntary generosity shown to the community over a long period of time, shall donate to the Community Foundation of Southeastern Michigan, a cash, lump sum payment within sixty (60) calendar days following Executive’s separation from service with Chemical (the “Donation”).  The amount of such Donation shall equal the lesser of:  (i) the total amount of any cash Severance Pay (as defined in the Employment Agreement) that Executive is entitled to receive under the Employment Agreement, and (ii) the dollar amount of his Severance Pay that Executive directs to be paid to the Community Foundation of Southeastern Michigan. Chemical and Executive agree that the Donation is not compensation to Executive for any services that Executive has provided to Chemical, is not due and would not otherwise have been paid to or at the direction of Executive, and Executive shall receive no economic benefit whatsoever as a result of the Donation.
This Agreement shall be binding upon any successor to Chemical. The Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement.  Facsimile or PDF reproductions of original signatures shall be deemed binding for the purpose of the execution of this Agreement.  No amendment of any provision of this Agreement shall be valid unless the amendment is in writing and signed by Chemical and Executive.
This Agreement is hereby executed as of the date set forth above.
	
			
	 
	 
	CHEMICAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION

	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ Thomas C. Shafer

	 
	 
	Thomas C. Shafer

	 
	Its:
	Vice Chairman of Chemical Financial Corporation

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	/s/ David T. Provost

	 
	 
	David T. Provost, Executive
52.216-23 Execution and Commencement of

Work.

As prescribed in 16.603-4(b)(1), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when a

letter contract is contemplated, except that it may be omitted from letter contracts awarded on

SF 26 :

Execution and Commencement of Work (Apr 1984)

The Contractor shall indicate acceptance of this letter contract by signing three copies of the

contract and returning them to the Contracting Officer not later than _______________ [insert date].

Upon acceptance by both parties, the Contractor shall proceed with performance of the work,

including purchase of necessary materials.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.216 [Reserved]
§ 56.56 Issuance. ( a ) *Resident grading basis.* Certificates will be issued only upon request therefor by the applicant or the AMS. When requested, a grader shall issue a certificate covering product graded by such grader. In addition, a grader may issue a grading certificate covering product graded in whole or in part by another grader when the grader has knowledge that the product is eligible for certification based on personal examination of the product or official grading records.
( b ) *Other than resident grading.* Each grader shall, in person or by the grader's authorized agent, issue a grading certificate covering each product graded by such grader. A grader's name may be signed on a grading certificate by a person other than the grader, if such person has been designated as the authorized agent of such grader by the national supervisor: *Provided,* That the certificate is prepared from an official memorandum of grading signed by the grader: *And provided further,* That a notarized power of attorney authorizing such signature has been issued to such person by the grader and is on file in the office of grading. In such case, the authorized agent shall sign both the agent's name and the grader's name, e.g., “John Doe by Mary Roe.”
[71 FR 42010, July 24, 2006]
§ 766.253 Unauthorized assistance resulting from submission of inaccurate information by borrower or Agency error. ( a ) *Borrower options.* ( 1 ) The borrower may repay the amount of the unauthorized assistance in a lump sum within 90 days of Agency notice.
( 2 ) If the borrower is unable to repay the entire amount in a lump sum, the Agency will accept partial repayment of the unauthorized assistance within 90 days of Agency notice to the extent of the borrower's ability to repay.
( 3 ) If the borrower is unable to repay all or part of the unauthorized amount, the loan will be converted to a Non-program loan under the following conditions: ( i ) The borrower did not provide false information;
( ii ) It is in the interest of the Agency;
( iii ) The debt will be subject to the interest rate for Non-program loans;
( iv ) The debt will be serviced as a Non-program loan;
( v ) The term of the Non-program loan will be as short as feasible, but in no case will exceed: ( A ) The remaining term of the FLP loan;
( B ) Twenty-five (25) years for real estate loans; or
( C ) The life of the security for chattel loans.
( b ) *Borrower refusal to pay.* If the borrower is able to pay the unauthorized assistance amount but refuses to do so, the Agency will notify the borrower of the availability of loan servicing in accordance with subpart C of this part.
§ 658.3 Applicability and exemptions. ( a ) Section 1540(b) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 4201(b), states that the purpose of the Act is to minimize the extent to which Federal programs contribute to the unnecessary and irreversible conversion of farmland to nonagricultural uses. Conversion of farmland to nonagricultural uses does not include the construction of on-farm structures necessary for farm operations. Federal agencies can obtain assistance from USDA in determining whether a proposed location or site meets the Act's definition of farmland. The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) field office serving the area will provide the assistance. Many State or local government planning offices can also provide this assistance.
( b ) Acquisition or use of farmland by a Federal agency for national defense purposes is exempted by section 1547(b) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 4208(b).
( c ) The Act and these regulations do not authorize the Federal Government in any way to regulate the use of private or non-Federal land, or in any way affect the property rights of owners of such land. In cases where either a private party or a non-Federal unit of government applies for Federal assistance to convert farmland to a nonagricultural use, the Federal agency should use the criteria set forth in this part to identify and take into account any adverse effects on farmland of the assistance requested and develop alternative actions that would avoid or mitigate such adverse effects. If, after consideration of the adverse effects and suggested alternatives, the landowners want to proceed with conversion, the Federal agency, on the basis of the analysis set forth in § 658.4 and any agency policies or procedures for implementing the Act, may provide or deny the requested assistance. Only assistance and actions that would convert farmland to nonagricultural uses are subject to this Act. Assistance and actions related to the purchase, maintenance, renovation, or replacement of existing structures and sites converted prior to the time of an application for assistance from a Federal agency, including assistance and actions related to the construction of minor new ancillary structures (such as garages or sheds), are not subject to the Act.
( d ) Section 1548 of the Act, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 4209, states that the Act shall not be deemed to provide a basis for any action, either legal or equitable, by any person or class of persons challenging a Federal project, program, or other activity that may affect farmland. Neither the Act nor this rule, therefore, shall afford any basis for such an action. However, as further provided in section 1548, the governor of an affected state, where a state policy or program exists to protect farmland, may bring an action in the Federal district court of the district where a Federal program is proposed to enforce the requirements of section 1541 of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 4202, and regulations issued pursuant to that section.
[49 FR 27724, July 5, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 31117, June 17, 1994]
u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REcEIvED 

In the Matter of: 

GoJ et Airlines LLC 

··OFFICE OF HEARINGS APR _ WASHINGTON, 1 2013 DC 

) 

) 

) 

HEARING DOCKET 

Served: March 25, 2013 

FAA Docket No. 

FAA. Case No. 2012CE030041 

Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

ADMINISTRATOR'S WITHDRAWAL 

OF HIS COMPLAINT 

Comes now the Administrator ofthe Federal Aviation Administration, by and 

through his Regional Counsel, and files his withdrawal of his Complaint filed in this case 

on September 10,2012. 

Dated this 25th day of March 2013. 

A. Lester Haizlip 

Regional Counsel 

By: 

Da · d Kessler 

Attorney 

Attorneys for the Agency 

Federal Aviation Administration 

901 Locust Street; Suite 506 

Kansas City, Missouri 64106 

(816) 329-3763 Telephone 

(816) 329-3771 Facsimile 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the original and copies of the foregoing WITHDRAWAL OF 

COMPLAINT was served this 25th day of March, 2013 on the following~ 

Facsimile and Original and copy by U.S. Mail, First Class Postage Pre-Paid: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

Room 5411 

US Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, SW 

Washington, DC 20590 

(202) 366-2143 Telephone 

(202) 366-7536 Facsimile 

Copy by Facsimile and U.S. Mail, First Class Postage Pre-Paid: 

David J.A. Hayes III, Esq. 

GoJet Airlines, LLC 

11495 Navaid Road, Suite 340 

Bridgeton, MO 63044 

(314) 222-4316 Telephone 

(314) 222-4311 Facsimile 

Copy by U.S. Mail, First Class Postage Pre-Paid: 

Hearing Docket 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Date: March 25, 2013 

Deborah L. Hervey 

Legal Assistant
1650
              Tysons Blvd., Suite 1600McLean,
              VA 22102tel
              703.714.8000fax
              703.714.8100




**Management’s
      Report on Assessment of**


**Compliance
      with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria**





J.E.
      Robert Company, Inc (the “Asserting Party”), as special servicer for commercial
      mortgage-backed securitization trusts, is responsible for assessing compliance
      as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006 through December
      31, 2006 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Item
      1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission, excluding
      the criteria set forth in 1122(d)(1)(iii), (d)(3)(i), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii),
      (d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(v), (d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii),
      (d)(4)(xiii), (d)(4)(xiv) and (d)(4)(xv), which the Asserting Party has
      determined as being inapplicable to the activities it performs with respect
      to
      the commercial mortgage-backed securitization trusts covered by this report
      (the
“Applicable Servicing Criteria”). For purposes of this report, the Asserting
      Party has defined its platform as all commercial mortgage-backed securitization
      trusts with an inception date on or after January 1, 2006 and that were
      registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
      Securities Act of 1933, for which the Asserting Party is the named special
      servicer during the Reporting Period (the “Platform”).





The
      Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
      Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party
      has
      complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
      for
      the Reporting Period.





Reznick,
      Group, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
      attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
      Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.








J.E.
      Robert Company, Inc.





/s/
      Michael F. Cocanougher


Michael
      F. Cocanougher


Director


Date:
      March 15, 2007
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-169-WKW

)

DEMETRIOUS TERELL PEGUES, et al. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the Order (Doc. # 223) dated April 30, 2007, is VACATED.

DONE this 1st day of May, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 226 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
§ 63.400 Books and records. The Board and NSIIC shall: ( a ) Maintain such books and records, which shall be made available to the Secretary for inspection and audit as is appropriate for the administration or enforcement of the Act or rules and regulations issued thereunder;
( b ) Prepare and submit to the Secretary, from time to time, such reports as the Secretary may prescribe; and
( c ) Account for the receipt and disbursement of all funds entrusted to it. The NSIIC shall cause its books and records to be audited by an independent auditor at the end of each fiscal year, and a report of such audit to be submitted to the Secretary.