alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
            UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
  required  to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
  10-K of GMACM Home Equity Loan Trust  2006-HE4  (the  "Exchange  Act  periodic
  reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
  do not  contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
  material  fact  necessary  to  make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
  circumstances  under which such  statements  were made,  not  misleading  with
  respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
  information  required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
  this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
  based on my knowledge and the  compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
  servicer  compliance  statements  required in this  report  under Item 1123 of
  Regulation  AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
  the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing  agreements
  in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
  asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
  compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed  securities required to be
  included  in this report in  accordance  with Item 1122 of  Regulation  AB and
  Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been  included as an exhibit to this
  report,  except as otherwise  disclosed in this report. Any material instances
  of noncompliance  described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
  on Form 10-K.

  In giving the  certifications  above, I have reasonably  relied on information
  provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  parties:  JPMorgan  Chase Bank,
  N.A. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.


Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      --------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Executive Vice President
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:96-cr-00036-MP All Defendants

EDDIE LEE GORDON,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 205, a letter to the Court, which the Court

construes to be a motion to reconsider the decision of the Court upholding his sentence. Doc.

110. Having considered the motion, the Court finds no reason to reconsider the prior decision of

the Court. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The motion at Doc. 205, construed as a motion to reconsider, is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of August, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:96-cr-00036-RH-CAS Document 206 Filed 08/05/11 Page 1 of 1
#### §§ 4288.122-4288.129 [Reserved]
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017080DE.01004602.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 25.3.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 80/46 |

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2014/66/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über die Bedingungen für die Einreise und den Aufenthalt von Drittstaatsangehörigen im Rahmen eines unternehmensinternen Transfers

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 157 vom 27. Mai 2014](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2014_157_R_TOC)
)

Seite 9, Artikel 3 Buchstabe j

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „j) | ‚Aufenthaltstitel für langfristige Mobilität‘ eine Genehmigung mit dem Eintrag des Begriffs ‚mobiler ICT‘, die den Inhaber eines Aufenthaltstitels ...“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „j) | ‚Aufenthaltstitel für langfristige Mobilität‘ eine Genehmigung mit dem Eintrag des Begriffs ‚mobile ICT‘, die den Inhaber eines Aufenthaltstitels ...“. |

---
§ 6.4 Investigations. ( a ) *Section 22.* The Administrator shall cause an investigation to be made whenever, based upon a request submitted pursuant to § 6.3 or upon other information available to him, he determines that there is reasonable ground to believe that the imposition of import quotas or fees under section 22 may be warranted, or that the termination or modification of import quotas or fees in effect under section 22 may be warranted.
( b ) *Section 8(a).* The Administrator shall cause an immediate investigation to be made whenever ( 1 ) a request is received for emergency treatment in connection with an application properly filed with the Tariff Commission under section 7;
( 2 ) a request is received for emergency treatment under section 22 if the Administrator determines that there is reasonable ground to believe that the imposition of import quotas or fees under section 22 may be warranted; or
( 3 ) the Administrator, upon the basis of other information available to him, has reasonable ground for believing that emergency treatment under section 8(a) is necessary. The Administrator shall expedite to the fullest practicable extent his attention to requests for emergency treatment under section 8(a), and such requests shall receive priority over requests for other action under section 22. The investigation shall cover (1) whether the commodity is a perishable agricultural commodity; (2) whether, due to the perishability of the commodity, a condition exists requiring emergency treatment as indicated by such factors as (i) the marketing season for the commodity, (ii) past and prospective domestic production, stocks, requirements, and prices, (iii) past and prospective imports; and (3) such other matters as the Administrator determines are relevant to a determination as to whether emergency treatment for the commodity is necessary. No public hearing shall be held in connection with investigations under this paragraph.
52.223-5 Pollution Prevention and Right-toKnow Information.

As prescribed in 23.1005 , insert the following clause:

Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information (May 2011)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clauseToxic chemical means a chemical or chemical category listed in 40 CFR372.65.

(b) Federal facilities are required to comply with the provisions of the Emergency Planning and

Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA) (42U.S. C.11001-11050), and the Pollution

Prevention Act of 1990 (PPA) (42U.S. C.13101-13109).

(c) The Contractor shall provide all information needed by the Federal facility to comply with the

following:

(1) The emergency planning reporting requirements of Section 302 of EPCRA.

(2) The emergency notice requirements of Section 304 of EPCRA.

(3) The list of Material Safety Data Sheets, required by Section 311 of EPCRA.

(4) The emergency and hazardous chemical inventory forms of Section 312 of EPCRA.

(5) The toxic chemical release inventory of Section 313 of EPCRA, which includes the reduction and

recycling information required by Section 6607 of PPA.

(6) The toxic chemical and hazardous substance release and use reduction goals of section 2(e) of

Executive Order 13423 and of Executive Order 13514.

(End of clause)

Alternate I (May 2011). As prescribed in 23.1005 (b), add the following paragraph (c)(7) to the basic

clause:

(c)(7) The environmental management system as described in section 3(b) of E.O. 13423 and 2(j) of

E.O. 13514.

Alternate II (May 2011). As prescribed in 23.1005 (c), add the following paragraph (c)(7) to the basic

clause. If Alternate I is also prescribed, renumber paragraph (c)(7) as paragraph (c)(8).

(c)(7) The facility compliance audits as described in section 3(c) of E.O. 13423.

Parent topic: 52.223 [Reserved]
#### § 63.8 NSIIC.

*NSIIC* or *Center* means the National Sheep Industry Improvement Center established under § 63.200.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2657 

To extend the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act of 1996 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2006 

Mr. SANTORUM (for himself and Mr. BAYH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act of 1996 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Iran Sanctions Exten5 sion Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES REGARDING SANC7 TIONS ON IRAN. 

8 Section 13(b) of the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act 

9 of 1996 (Public Law 104–172; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is 

10 amended by striking ‘‘10 years’’ and inserting ‘‘15 years’’. 

Æ 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# 52.245-3 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.245 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-**

**OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Ann D. Rhoads, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Zogenix, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 4, 2011
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.20


AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT


This amendment (“Amendment”), dated as of January 18, 2018, amends the Consulting Agreement dated as of January 7, 2013 (“Agreement”), between Wisconsin Energy Corporation, n/k/a WEC Energy Group, Inc. (the “Company”), and Frederick D. Kuester (the “Consultant”).  This amendment is entered into by the parties pursuant to Paragraph 5 of the Agreement.
WHEREAS, as a result of recent events at the Company and the Consultant’s significant experience in the utility industry and considerable knowledge of the Company's business, the Company desires the Consultant to provide additional consulting services than he has been providing under the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, in light of the additional services to be provided by the Consultant to the Company, both parties have agreed to enter into this Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as set forth below.
1. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
		
	a.
	The first sentence of Paragraph 1 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following sentence:  “The Consultant agrees to consult with the Company on major capital projects and to provide such other services as may be requested by the Company (collectively, the "Services").”


		
	b.
	The first sentence of Paragraph 1(c) is amended by deleting “$9,500” and replacing it with “$63,750”.


		
	c.
	The first sentence of Paragraph 1(h) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following sentence “The Services performed under this Agreement will be determined by the CEO of the Company, currently Gale E. Klappa.”


2.  Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  The Agreement and this Amendment shall be read, taken and construed as one and the same instrument.


[Signatures on next page following.]















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Amendment to Consulting Agreement on the date(s) indicated below.


WEC ENERGY GROUP, INC.


By:  /s/ GALE E. KLAPPA                     Date:   January 18, 2018    
Gale E. Klappa, Chairman and CEO




CONSULTANT




/s/ FREDERICK D. KUESTER                   Date:    January 18, 2018    
Frederick D. Kuester




2
Docket Number FAA-2014-0056
#### § 58.928 Quality control tests.

All dairy products and other ingredients shall be subject to inspection for quality and condition throughout each processing operation. Quality control tests shall be made on flow samples as often as is necessary to check the effectiveness of processing and manufacturing and as an aid in correcting deficiencies. Routine analyses shall be made on raw materials and finished products to assure adequate composition control. For each batch or production run a keeping quality test shall be made to determine product stability.
---

Exhibit 99.9




CONSENT OF AUTHOR




TO:                         Ur-Energy Inc.


British Columbia Securities Commission


Alberta Securities Commission


Saskatchewan Securities Commission


Manitoba Securities Commission


Ontario Securities Commission


United States Securities and Exchange Commission




AND TO:              Toronto Stock Exchange


NYSE Amex, LLC




RE:           Ur-Energy Inc. (“Ur-Energy”) - Consent under National Instrument 43-101




Reference is made to the technical report titled “Preliminary Assessment Lost Creek Property Sweetwater County Wyoming”(March16, 2011) (the “Technical Report”) which the undersigned has prepared for Ur-Energy.




I have reviewed and approved the summaries of and extracts from the Technical Report prepared to be filed with the Annual Report on Form 40-F (Annual Information Form) of Ur-Energy (fiscal year ended December 31, 2010) and confirm that such summaries and extracts fairly and accurately represent the information in the Technical Report.




I hereby consent to the written disclosure of my name, and reference to and incorporation by reference of, the Technical Report in the public filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F (Annual Information Form) of Ur-Energy with the regulatory authorities referred to above.  I further consent to the incorporation by reference of the Technical Report into Registration Statement No. 333-153098 on Form S-8.




I certify that I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 40-F (Annual Information Form) being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from the Technical Report or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services performed by me in connection with the Technical Report.




Dated:  March 17, 2011




Signed and Sealed




/s/ Douglass H. Graves, P.E.


Douglass H. Graves, P.E., President


TREC, Inc
#### § 58.925 Sweetened condensed.

After condensing, the sweetened condensed product should be cooled rapidly to about 85 °F to induce crystallization of the oversaturated lactose. When the desired crystallization is reached further cooling is resumed to 68°-70 °F.
52.247-11 Net Weight-Household Goods or Office Furniture.       As prescribed in 47.207-4(b), insert the following clause in contracts for transportation or for transportation-related services when movements of Government employees’ household goods or relocations of Government offices are involved:          Net Weight-Household Goods or Office Furniture (Apr 1984)                                       (a)                   *Net weight-full loads.* The net weight of the shipment shall be determined by deducting the tare weight of the vehicle (determined by having a certified weighmaster weigh on a certified scale the empty vehicle with all blankets, pads, chains, dollies, hand trucks, and all other necessary equipment inside the vehicle) from the gross weight of the vehicle (determined by having a certified weighmaster weigh on a certified scale the fully loaded vehicle before arrival at destination).                                          (b)                   *Net weight-part loads.* The net weight of the first part load shall be determined in the same manner as specified for a full load. The net weight of the second part load shall be determined by using as the tare weight of the vehicle the gross weight of the vehicle containing the first part load and deducting this weight from the new gross weight (determined by having the loaded vehicle weighed again, in the same manner as specified for the full load). The same procedure shall apply for each succeeding part load.                                          (c)                   *Weight certificates.* The contractor shall attach the original copy of each weight certificate to the invoice for services.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 3 of 3
#### Ruth Stein, as Administratrix of the Estate of Rose Wagner, Deceased, Respondent, v. Morris Mostoff et al., Copartners Doing Business as Dover Nursing Home, Appellants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 21, 1969, which granted plaintiff’s motion for entry of judgment against defendants pursuant to a settlement agreement; (2) a judgment of the same court, dated April 24, 1969, entered upon said order; and (3) an order of the same court, dated May 19, 1969, which denied defendants’ motion to reargue plaintiff’s said motion. Appeal from order dated May 19, 1969 dismissed, without costs. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Order dated April 21, 1969 and judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and plaintiff’s motion denied. Appellants are awarded a single bill of $10 costs and disbursements to cover all the appeals. An attorney has no implied authority to settle a case without the consent of his client and, hence, a settlement agreement negotiated by an attorney, without the consent of his client, is not personally binding on the client (see *Countryman*v. *Breen,*241 App. Div. 392, affd. 268 N. Y. 643; see, also, *Silver*v. *Parkdale Bake Shop,*8 A D 2d 607; *Ricketts*v. *Pennsylvania R. Co.,*153 F. 2d 757). Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Martuscello, Kleinfeld and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
#### § 51.303 U.S. Utility.

“U.S. Utility” consists of apples of one variety (except when more than one variety is printed on the container) which are mature but not overripe, not seriously deformed and free from decay, internal browning, internal breakdown, soft scald, and freezing injury. The apples are also free from serious damage caused by dirt or other foreign matter, broken skins, bruises, brown surface discoloration, russeting, sunburn or sprayburn, limb rubs, hail, drought spots, scars, stem or calyx cracks, visible water core, bitter pit or Jonathan spot, disease, insects, or other means. (*See* § 51.306.)
No. 03-15-00334- CR

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE

THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS

--------------------

EX PARTE MOISES MARTINEZ,

Appellant

vs.

STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

--------------------

Appeal from Cause No. 2C11-07750

Bell County Court-at-Law No. Two

--------------------

STATE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

--------------------

JAMES NICHOLS

BELL COUNTY ATTORNEY

by

Stephen Morris

Assistant County Attorney

P.O. Box 1127

Belton, Texas 76513

Tel: (254) 933-5135

Fax: (254) 933-5150

SBN: 14501700

ACCEPTED

03-15-00334-CR

7096861

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

9/25/2015 10:05:58 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/25/2015 10:05:58 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
STATE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

To the Honorable Court of Appeals:

Comes now Stephen Morris, Assistant Bell County Attorney, representing the

State of Texas and files this Motion to Extend Time to File a Brief in answer, and

shows as follows:

1. This is an appeal from denial of an application of a writ of habeas corpus

to issue in a criminal case. Appellant’s Brief was filed on August 28,2015.

2. The State’s Brief is due September 28, 2015.

3. The State seeks to extend the time of filing its Brief by thirty (30) days. If

granted, the extension would require the State’s Brief to be due on or before October

28, 2015.

4. Good cause exists for this extension of time. State’s appellate counsel in

addition to being assigned the instant appeal, he has been assigned a full case load.

Additional time is needed to complete the Brief. 

5. There has been no previous extension granted to the State regarding this

appeal.

6. This motion is unopposed by Appellant’s counsel.

Wherefore, premises considered, the State respectfully requests that the Court

extend the time for filing his Brief up to and including October 28, 2015.
Respectfully submitted,

/S/ Stephen Morris

________________________

Stephen Morris

Assistant Bell County Attorney

Bell County Attorney’s Office

P.O. Box 1127

Belton, Texas 76513

(254) 933-5135

Certificate of Conference

I hereby certify that I have conferred with counsel for Appellant on September

21, 2015 and counsel does not oppose the above requested extension. Therefore, this

motion is submitted as not apposed.

/S/ Stephen Morris

_________________________

Stephen Morris

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent to the

person(s) named below, at the address shown by placing the same in a properly

addressed envelope, certified, pre-paid, and mailing the document by first class mail

on September 24, 2015.

/S/ Stephen Morris

_________________________

Stephen Morris
Jose Vela III, Esq.

Texas State Bar No. 24048859

505 E. Huntland Drive, Suite 300 

Austin, Texas 78752

(512) 615-3366 (fax)

(512) 633-1785 (phone) 

E-mail: chito.v@walkergatesvela.com
#### NEWELL, Respondent, v. CLIFT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 23, 1906.)

Action by Leosa Newell against Frank D. Clift, as executor, etc.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.