alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 400.96 Judicial review. Except as provided in § 400.98, with respect to adverse determinations: ( a ) A participant must exhaust administrative remedies before seeking judicial review of an adverse decision. This requires the participant to appeal an Agency adverse decision to NAD in accordance with 7 CFR part 11 prior to seeking judicial review of the adverse decision.
( b ) If the adverse decision involves a matter determined by the Agency to be not appealable, the appellant must request a determination of non-appealability from the Director of NAD, and appeal the adverse decision to NAD if the Director determines that it is appealable, prior to seeking judicial review.
( c ) A participant with a contract of insurance reinsured by the Agency may bring suit against the Agency if the suit involves an adverse action in a United States district court after exhaustion of administrative remedies as provided in this section. Nothing in this section can be construed to create privity of contract between the Agency and a participant.
[67 FR 13251, Mar. 22, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 37720, June 25, 2003]
Case 4:00-cv-00453-MP Document 1 Filed 12/04/00 Page 1 of 9
Case 4:00-cv-00453-MP Document 1 Filed 12/04/00 Page 2 of 9
Case 4:00-cv-00453-MP Document 1 Filed 12/04/00 Page 3 of 9
Case 4:00-cv-00453-MP Document 1 Filed 12/04/00 Page 4 of 9
Case 4:00-cv-00453-MP Document 1 Filed 12/04/00 Page 5 of 9
Case 4:00-cv-00453-MP Document 1 Filed 12/04/00 Page 6 of 9
Case 4:00-cv-00453-MP Document 1 Filed 12/04/00 Page 7 of 9
Case 4:00-cv-00453-MP Document 1 Filed 12/04/00 Page 8 of 9
Case 4:00-cv-00453-MP Document 1 Filed 12/04/00 Page 9 of 9
Case 1:98-cr-00019-MP   Document 1555   Filed 07/16/08   Page 1 of 1
EX-33 (c)
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of
The First American Corporation, and the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006, and for the period from January 1,
2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
(d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of
Federal Regulations (the "CFR") applicable to the Asserting Party (the
"Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report
include all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which
the Asserting Party served as the residential tax service provider (the
"Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that, except as set forth
hereinbelow, the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

The Asserting Party assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has identified a material instance of
noncompliance with the servicing criterion set forth in Section
229.1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of the CFR with respect to the Platform. Specifically,
the Asserting Party did not prepare reconciliations for all asset-backed
securities related bank accounts within 30 calendar days after the bank
statement cut-off date or such number of days specified in the transaction
agreements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period as set forth in this assertion.

FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.
By: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC
General Partner

/s/ Lucy A. Przybyla
Lucy A. Przybyla
Senior Vice President
February 28, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

Civil Hearing Minutes

Honorable Hope T. Cannon, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case Style: IN RE: Skanska USA Civil Southeast Inc and Skanska USA Inc. 

Case No.: 3:20-cv-5980/LAC-HTC

Date: June 22, 2021

Hearing: Discovery Hearing – ESI Matters

__________________________________________________________________

Time Commenced: 3:30 p.m. Time Concluded: 5:15 p.m. 

Court Reporter: Connie Morse, Phipps Court Reporting

Attorneys present for Petitioners:

Elizabeth Billhimer

Scott Remington 

Attorneys present for Claimants:

Sam Geisler

Nicole Guntner

Attorneys participating telephonically:

Charles Blanchard, Esquire 

Robb Hyde, Department of Justice

PROCEEDINGS:

3:30 p.m. Court in session.

Discovery Motion – ESI Matters

5:15 p.m. Court adjourned.

__________________________

Filed in Open Court/DCR

 June 23, 2021 

Deputy Clerk: Keri Igney

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1196 Filed 06/22/21 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Frederic T. Boyer, Principal Financial Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.                                                                                            

Dated: May 14, 2003



| | /s/   FREDERIC T. BOYERFrederic T. Boyer
Principal Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
# L_2015305DE.01005501.xml

| 21.11.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 305/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 305/55

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 334/2014 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 11. März 2014 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 528/2012 über die Bereitstellung auf dem Markt und die Verwendung von Biozidprodukten hinsichtlich bestimmter Bedingungen für den Zugang zum Markt

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 103 vom 5. April 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 103 vom 5. April 2014

Seite 30, Artikel 1 Nummer 21 Buchstabe c, neuer Artikel 89 Absatz 4, Einleitungsteil:

Anstatt:

„(4)   Entscheidet die zuständige Behörde eines Mitgliedstaats oder gegebenenfalls die Kommission, einen gemäß Absatz 3 gestellten Zulassungsantrag für ein bereits in Verkehr gebrachtes Biozidprodukt abzulehnen oder keine Zulassung zu erteilen oder die Zulassung an Bedingungen zu knüpfen, die eine Änderung des Produkts erfordern würden, so gilt Folgendes:“

muss es heißen:

„(4)   Entscheidet die zuständige Behörde eines Mitgliedstaats oder gegebenenfalls die Kommission, einen gemäß Absatz 3 gestellten Zulassungsantrag für ein bereits auf dem Markt bereitgestelltes Biozidprodukt abzulehnen oder keine Zulassung zu erteilen oder die Zulassung an Bedingungen zu knüpfen, die eine Änderung des Produkts erfordern würden, so gilt Folgendes:“.

Seite 31, Artikel 1 Nummer 24, neuer Artikel 95 Absatz 2:

Anstatt:

„(2)   Ab dem 1. September 2015 darf ein Biozidprodukt, das aus einem in der Liste gemäß Absatz 1 aufgeführten betreffenden Stoff besteht, einen solchen Stoff enthält oder einen solchen Stoff erzeugt, nur dann in Verkehr gebracht werden, wenn der Stofflieferant oder der Produktlieferant in der Liste gemäß Absatz 1 für die Produktart oder die Produktarten, zu denen das Produkt gehört, aufgeführt ist.“

muss es heißen:

„(2)   Ab dem 1. September 2015 darf ein Biozidprodukt, das aus einem in der Liste gemäß Absatz 1 aufgeführten betreffenden Stoff besteht, einen solchen Stoff enthält oder einen solchen Stoff erzeugt, nur dann auf dem Markt bereitgestellt werden, wenn der Stofflieferant oder der Produktlieferant in der Liste gemäß Absatz 1 für die Produktart oder die Produktarten, zu denen das Produkt gehört, aufgeführt ist.“

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    /s/ Freddie M. KotekName:
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:Date:
    Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerMarch 30, 2011
52.241-10 Termination Liability.       As prescribed in 41.501(d)(4), insert a clause substantially the same as the following:          Termination Liability (Feb 1995)                                       (a) 						            If the Government discontinues utility service under this contract before completion of the facilities cost recovery period specified in paragraph (b) of this clause, in consideration of the Contractor furnishing and installing at its expense, the new facility described herein, the Government shall pay termination charges, calculated as set forth in this clause.                                          (b)                   *Facility cost recovery period.* The period of time, not exceeding the term of this contract, during which the net cost of the new facility shall be recovered by the Contractor is ______ months.[*Insert negotiated duration.*]                                          (c)                   *Net facility cost.* The cost of the new facility, less the agreed upon salvage value of such facility, is $_______. [*Insert appropriate dollar amount*.]                                          (d)                   *Monthly facility cost recovery rate.* The monthly facility cost recovery rate which the Government shall pay the Contractor whether or not service is received is $_____.[*Divide the net facility cost in paragraph (c) of this clause by the facility’s cost recovery period in paragraph (b) of this clause and insert the resultant figure*.]                                          (e)                   *Termination charges.* Termination charges = $____.[*Multiply the remaining months of the facility's cost recovery period specified in paragraph (b) of this clause by the monthly facility cost recovery rate in paragraph (d) of this clause and insert the resultant figure*.]                                          (f) 						            If the Contractor has recovered its capital costs at the time of termination there will be no termination liability charge.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.241 Utility Services Provisions and Clauses.
EXHIBIT 35.2
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
             RALI SERIES 2006-QS12 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Executive Vice President
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 4:96-cr-00036-MP

EDDIE LEE GORDON,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 157, Motion for Reconsideration re Doc. 155, 

Motion Relief from Judgment of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

60(b)(6), filed by Eddie Lee Gordon. Previously, this matter was before the Court on doc. 153,

defendant's motion to modify his sentence, and doc. 155, defendant's motion under Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) to vacate the judgment denying his previously filed § 2255 petition.

In these motions, the defendant simply raises again two arguments previously rejected by this

court in previous orders, and by the Eleventh Circuit on appeal. As such, defendant is in reality

attempting to file successive § 2255 petitions without receiving prior permission from the

Eleventh Circuit. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The Motion for Reconsideration, doc. 157, is denied. Additionally, the Clerk shall not

accept for filing any additional motion filed by Mr. Gordon unless directed to do so by

order of the Court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of June, 2006

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:96-cr-00036-RH-CAS Document 158 Filed 06/28/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                 CWABS ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2006-16
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-16


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                 Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
# L_2014111EN.01004201.xml

| 15.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 111/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 111/42

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 384/2014

of 3 April 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Crème de Bresse (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Crème de Bresse’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Crème de Bresse’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Crème de Bresse’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Crème de Bresse’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 April 2014.

For the Commission

On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 335, 16.11.2013, p. 16.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.4. Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.)

FRANCE

Crème de Bresse (PDO)

---
§ 636.1 Applicability. ( a ) The purpose of the Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program (WHIP) is to help participants develop fish and wildlife habitat on private agricultural land, nonindustrial private forest land (NIPF), and Indian land.
( b ) The regulations in this part set forth the requirements for WHIP.
( c ) The Chief, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), may implement WHIP in any of the 50 States, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
#### §§ 4288.27-4288.100 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carlos Fabian De
Sousa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Carlos Fabian De SousaCarlos
      Fabian De SousaChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      8, 2009


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The
foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.
#### § 58.639 Addition of flavor.

The addition of flavoring ingredients to semi-frozen mix just prior to packaging shall be performed in a clean and sanitary manner. Care shall be taken to insure the flavor injection equipment has been properly cleaned and sanitized prior to use and that the flavor ingredients are of good quality and wholesome.
§ 760.201 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart establishes the terms and conditions under which the Emergency Assistance for Livestock, Honeybees, and Farm-Raised Fish Program (ELAP) will be administered.
( b ) Eligible producers of livestock, honeybees, and farm-raised fish will be compensated to reduce eligible losses that occurred in the calendar year for which the producer requests benefits. The eligible loss must have been a direct result of eligible adverse weather or eligible loss conditions as determined by the Deputy Administrator, including, but not limited to, blizzards, wildfires, disease, and insect infestation. ELAP does not cover losses that are covered under LFP, LIP, or SURE.
Exhibit 99.1

ENSTAR INCOME PROGRAM II-2, L.P.

12405 Powerscourt Drive

St. Louis, MO 63131

 

CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE VICEEXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, AND SOLE DIRECTOR OF THE CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

I, Steve A. Schumm, the Executive Vice President, Chief Adminstrative Officer, and Sole Director of the Corporate General Partner in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission: 

fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Steve A. Schumm	

Steve A. Schumm

Executive Vice President, Chief

Adminstrative Officer, and Sole Director

of the Corporate General Partner

August 14, 2002
O R D E R

In its petition for disciplinary or remedial action, the Attorney Grievance 

Commission alleged that respondent had been found guilty of a serious crime and

that he had engaged in professional misconduct as that term is defined in Rule 19-

701(r). Respondent was disbarred by the Court of Appeals of the District of 

Columbia for violation of Rule 8.4 of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional 

Conduct and Maryland Rule 19-308.4. Upon the filing of the petition and pursuant 

to Rules 19-737 and 19-738, the Court issued an order requiring the respondent to 

show cause why corresponding discipline should not be imposed. Respondent did 

not respond to the order to show cause. Accordingly, it is this 24th day of September

2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 19-737(f), corresponding discipline is 

imposed and, effective immediately, Respondent, Brian David O’Neill, is disbarred 

from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Brian David 

O’Neill from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees 

of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial 

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE 

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

BRIAN DAVID O’NEILL

*

*

*

*

*

*

 IN THE

 SUPREME COURT

 OF MARYLAND

 AG Docket No. 5

 September Term, 2024 
2

tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

 Chief Justice
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

DAVID W. JAHN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-623-MEF

)

REGINALD JAMES WASHINGTON, )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion for Extension of Deadline (Doc. #32)

filed on June 27, 2007, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.

DONE this the 29th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 33 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 1