UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549








FORM 10-K








x
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2011ORo
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





Commission file number 000-52837








GOLDEN STAR RESOURCE CORP.





(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





NEVADA





(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)





3390 Toopal Drive


Oceanside, California


92058





(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code.)





(210) 862-3071





(telephone number, including area code)








Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.


Yes  ̈     No x








Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act:


Yes  ̈     No x








Indicate by check mark whether the registrant(1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 day.


Yes x     No  ̈








Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulations S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ̈























1








Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 if the Exchange Act.





Large Accelerated Filer
 ̈
Accelerated Filer
 ̈Non-accelerated Filer
 ̈
Smaller Reporting Company
x(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)








Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YesoNox





State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of June 30, 2011: $0.25.
























































2











TABLE OF CONTENTSPagePART IItem 1.
Business.
4Item 1A.
Risk Factors.
4Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments.
4Item 2.
Properties.
5Item 3.
Legal Proceedings.
5Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
5PART IIItem 5.
Market Price for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholders Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
5Item 6.
Selected Financial Data.
6Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.
6Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
7Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
F-1PART IIIItem 9
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
8Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures.
8Item 9B.
Other Information.
9Item 10.
Directors and Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons.
9Item 11.
Executive Compensation.
11Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
13Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
13Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
14PART IVItem 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
15Signatures

16















































3








PART I








ITEM 1.     BUSINESS





General





We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 21, 2006. We are an exploration stage corporation. An exploration stage corporation is one engaged in the search for mineral deposits or reserves which are not in either development or production stages.  We maintain our statutory registered agent's office at The Corporation Trust Company of Nevada, 6100 Neil Road, Suite 500, Reno, Nevada 89511. Our business office is located at 3390 Toopal Drive, Oceanside, California 92058. This is our mailing address as well. Our telephone number is (210) 862-3071. Ms. Miller, our secretary/treasurer, provides our office space on a rent-free basis.





We have no revenues, have achieved losses since inception, have no operations, have been issued a going concern opinion and rely upon the sale of our securities and loans from our officers and directors to fund operations.


We have no plans to change our business activities or to combine with another business. We are not aware of any events or circumstances that might cause us to change our plans.





To date, the Company is in the process of identifying and evaluating other mineral claim interests for its planned business operations.





Background





We are an exploration stage mining company, incorporated in Nevada.





The Company has been in the exploration stage since its formation and is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining claims.  Upon location of a commercial minable reserve, the Company expects to actively prepare the site for its extraction and enter a development stage.





On May 9, 2006, the Company acquired, from a private company controlled by an officer/shareholder of the Company, a 100% interest in three contiguous mineral claims (now amalgamated into one mineral claim) encompassing over 800 hectares in the Cariboo Mining Division, British Columbia, Canada, for consideration of a cash payment of $10,000. During the fiscal year 2010, the Company’s mineral claim interest was expired and lapsed.  To date, the Company is in the process of identifying and evaluating other mineral claim interests for its planned business operations.





Employees





We intend to use the services of subcontractors for exploration work on our properties.





Employees and Employment Agreements





At present, we have no full-time employees. Our two officers and directors are part-time employees and each will devote about 10% of their time or four hours per week to our operation. Our officers and directors do not have employment agreements with us. We presently do not have pension, health, annuity, insurance, stock options, profit sharing or similar benefit plans. However, we may adopt plans in the future. There are presently no personal benefits available to our officers and directors. Marilyn Miller, one of our officers and directors, will handle our administrative duties. On July 1, 2010, our director Marilyn Miller entered into a consulting agreement with us to provide certain consulting services. This
agreement was cancelled because our officers and directors have determined that they will hire qualified persons to perform the evaluation, surveying and exploration of potential projects.  As of today, we have engaged private companies to review and evaluate properties and mineral claims located in USA and Mexico.





Our Office




Our business office is located at 3390 Toopal Drive, Oceanside, California 92058. This is our mailing address as well. Our telephone number is (210) 862-3071.




ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS.





We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.





ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.




We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.





4











ITEM 2.     PROPERTIES





We do not own any property.




ITEM 3.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS





We are not presently a party to any litigation.





ITEM 4.     SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS





During the fourth quarter, there were no matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders.











PART II





ITEM 5.     MARKET FOR COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS





Only a limited market exists for our securities. There is no assurance that our limited market will develop into a regular trading market, or if developed, that it will be sustained. Therefore, a shareholder in all likelihood will be unable to resell his securities in our company. Furthermore, it is unlikely that a lending institution will accept our securities as pledged collateral for loans unless a regular trading market develops.





Our company's securities are traded over-the-counter on the Bulletin Board operated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) under the symbol “GLNS”. Our shares were listed for trading on July 3, 2007.





Fiscal Year2011

High Bid


Low BidFourth Quarter 4-01-11 to 6-30-11

$
0.25


$
0.0Third Quarter 1-01-11 to 3-31-11

$
0.25


$
0.0Second Quarter 10-01-10 to 12-31-10

$
0.25


$
0.0First Quarter 7-01-10 to 9-30-10

$
0.25


$
0.0








Fiscal Year2010

High Bid


Low BidFourth Quarter 4-01-10 to 6-30-10

$
0.25


$
0.0Third Quarter 1-01-10 to 3-31-10

$
0.0


$
0.0Second Quarter 10-01-09 to 12-31-09

$
0.0


$
0.0First Quarter 7-01-09 to 9-30-09

$
0.0


$
0.0





Dividend Policy





We have not declared any cash dividends. We do not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, but rather to reinvest earnings, if any, in our business operations.





Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Our shares are covered by section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended that imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouses). For transactions covered by the Rule, the broker/dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase and have received the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction prior to the sale. Consequently, the Rule may affect the ability of broker/dealers to
sell our securities and also may affect your ability to sell your shares in the secondary market.





Section 15(g) also imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell penny securities. These rules require a one page summary of certain essential items. The items include the risk of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary marketing; terms important to in understanding of the function of the penny stock market, such as “bid” and “offer” quotes, a dealers “spread” and broker/dealer compensation; the broker/dealer compensation, the broker/dealers duties to its customers, including the disclosures required by any other penny stock disclosure rules; the
customers rights and remedies in causes of fraud in penny stock transactions; and, the NASD's toll free telephone number and the central number of the North American Administrators Association, for information on the disciplinary history of broker/dealers and their associated persons.





5





ITEM 5.     MARKET FOR COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS - continued





Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans





We have no equity compensation plans and accordingly we have no shares authorized for issuance under an equity compensation plan.





Status of our public offering





On October 25, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared our Form SB-2 Registration Statement effective, file number 333-137922, permitting us to offer up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.10 per share. There was no underwriter involved in our public offering.





On March 28, 2007, we completed our public offering by raising $107,000. We sold 1,070,000 shares of our common stock at an offering price of $0.10 per share.





Use of Proceeds





Since the time of raising money by offering shares of our stock, we have proceeds of $107,000. We have used proceeds (net of $62,801 accounts payable and accrued liabilities, $67,722 loan payable and $880 due to related parties) for the following: $131,469 for professional fees, $18,000 for administration, $45,859 for consulting fees, $10,000 for a mineral claim payment, $3,758 for transfer and filing, $25,056 for office and sundry, $6,000 for rent and $5,217 interest expense outlays. Our total cash outlays have been offset by a $6,947 foreign exchange gain.





ITEM 6.     SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.





We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.





ITEM 7.     MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.





This section of the annual report includes a number of forward- looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are often identified by words like: believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, intend, project and similar expressions, or words which, by their nature, refer to future events. You should not place undue certainty on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this annual report. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or our predictions.





Plan of Operation





We are an exploration stage corporation and have not yet generated or realized any revenues from our business operations.





Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills. This is because we have not generated any revenues and do not anticipate generating any revenues until we begin removing and selling minerals. There is no assurance we will ever achieve these goals. Accordingly, we must raise cash from sources other than the sale of minerals in order to implement our project and stay in business. Our only other source for cash at this time is investments by others.





Our exploration target is to find mineralized material, specifically, an ore body containing gold. Our success depends upon finding mineralized material. This includes a determination by our consultant that the property contains reserves. We have not yet selected a consultant. Mineralized material is a mineralized body which has been delineated by appropriate spaced drilling or underground sampling to support sufficient tonnage and average grade of metals to justify removal.  If we don’t find mineralized material or if it is not economically feasible to remove it, we will cease operations and you will lose your investment.





In addition, we may not have enough money to complete the acquisition and exploration of a property. If it turns out that we have not raised enough money to complete our acquisition we will try to raise additional funds from a second public offering, a private placement or through loans. At the present time, we have not made any plans to raise additional money and there is no assurance that we would be able to raise additional money in the future. If we need additional money and cannot raise it, we will have to suspend or cease operations.





6





ITEM 7.     MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - continued





Limited Operating History; Need for Additional Capital





There is no historical financial information about us upon which to base an evaluation of our performance. We are an exploration stage corporation and have not generated any revenues from operations. We cannot guarantee we will be successful in our business operations. Our business is subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including limited capital resources, possible delays in the acquisition and exploration of our properties, and possible cost overruns due to price increases in services.





To become profitable and competitive, we need to identify a property and conduct research and explore our property before we start production of any minerals we may find. If we do find mineralized material, we will need additional funding to move beyond the research and exploration stage. We have no assurance that future financing will be available to us on acceptable terms. If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue, develop or expand our operations. Equity financing could result in additional dilution to existing shareholders.





Liquidity and Capital Resources





We have completed our public offering as of March 28, 2007 and to date have raised $107,060, we will attempt to raise additional money through a subsequent private placement, public offering or through loans.





Currently, we do not have sufficient funds for our intended business operation. Ms. Miller, one of our officers and directors, has agreed in financing the related operating expenditures to maintain the Company. The foregoing agreement is oral; we have nothing in writing. While Ms. Miller has agreed to advance the funds, the agreement is unenforceable as a matter of law because no consideration was given. At the present time, we have not made any arrangements to raise additional cash. If we need additional cash and can't raise it, we will either have to suspend operations until we do raise the cash, or cease operations entirely. Other than as described in this paragraph, we have no other financing
plans.





Since inception, we have issued 7,070,000 shares of our common stock and received $107,060.





In March 2006, we issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock to Kathrine MacDonald, our former secretary/treasurer, in consideration of $30 and we issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock to Marilyn Miller, one of our officers and directors, in consideration of $30 pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1993.





We issued 1,070,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. This was accounted for as a purchase of shares of common stock.





As of June 30 2011, our total assets were $51 and our total liabilities were $131,403.





ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.





We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

















7








ITEM 8.           FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.










GOLDEN STAR RESOURCE CORP.


(An Exploration Stage Company)








FINANCIAL STATEMENTS








JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009





(Stated in U.S. Dollars)








INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


F-2Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and 2010


F-3Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and From Inception, April 21, 2006 to June 30, 2011


F-4Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and From Inception, April 21, 2006 to June 30, 2011


F-5Statements of Stockholders’ (Deficiency) Equity From Inception, April 21, 2006 to June 30, 2011


F-6Notes to Financial Statements


F-7 - F-13



















F-1
  REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
 
 
 GOLDEN STAR RESOURCE CORP.
 (An exploration stage company)
 
 We have audited the balance sheet of Golden Star Resource Corp.(“the Company”) (an exploration stage company)as at June 30, 2011 and the related statements of stockholders’ (deficiency) equity, operations and comprehensive loss and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We did not audit the Company’s financial statements as of and for the year ended June 30, 2010, and the cumulative data from
April 21, 2006 (inception) to June 30, 2010 in the statements of stockholders’ (deficiency) equity, operations and comprehensive loss and cash flows, which were audited by other auditors whose report, dated September 27, 2010 which expressed an unqualified opinion, has been furnished to us.  Our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for cumulative data from April 21, 2006 (inception) to June 30, 2010, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.
 
 We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
 In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at June 30, 2011 and the result of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.
 
 The accompanying financial statements refer to above have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred losses from inception and has not generated revenue to date.  These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
      Vancouver,  Canada

/s/ MNP LLPOctober 5, 2011

Chartered Accounts
 
 F-2
 
 
 GOLDEN STAR RESOURCE CORP.
 (An Exploration Stage Company)
 
 BALANCE SHEETS
 (Stated in U.S. Dollars)
 
 
 
 JUNE 302011


2010ASSETSCurrentCash

$
51


$
7$
51


$
7LIABILITIESCurrent LiabilitiesAccounts payable and accrued liabilities

$
62,801


$
2,832Loan payable


67,722



-Due to related parties


880



40,274131,403



43,106STOCKHOLDERS’  ( DEFICIENCY) EQUITYCapital StockAuthorized:100,000,000 voting common shares with a par value of $0.00001 per share100,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.00001 per share,

none issuedIssued:7,070,000 common shares at June 30, 2011 and 2010


70



70Additional paid in capital


106,990



106,990Deficit Accumulated During the Exploration Stage


(238,412
)


(150,159
)(131,352
)


(43,099
)$
51


$
7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
  F-3
  GOLDEN STAR RESOURCE CORP.
 (An Exploration Stage Company)
 
 STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
 (Stated in U.S. Dollars)
 
 
 
 CUMULATIVEPERIOD FROMINCEPTIONYEAR


YEAR


APRIL 21ENDED


ENDED


2006 TOJUNE 30


JUNE 30


JUNE 302011


2010


2011Revenue

$
-


$
-


$
-ExpensesProfessional fees


13,137



7,513



131,469Administration


18,000



-



18,000Consulting fees


30,000



-



45,859Mineral claim payment


-



-



10,000Transfer and filing fees


-



100



3,758Office and sundry


15,875



1,850



25,056Interest expenses


5,217



-



5,217Rent


6,000



-



6,000Foreign exchange loss


24



3,598



(6,947
)88,253



13,061



238,412Net Loss and Comprehensive Loss

$
(88,253
)

$
(13,061
)

$
(238,412
)Basic And Diluted Loss Per Common Share

$
(0.00
)

$
(0.00
)Weighted Average Number Of Common Shares Outstanding


7,070,000



7,070,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
  F-4
  GOLDEN STAR RESOURCE CORP.
 (An Exploration Stage Company)
 
 STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 (Stated in U.S. Dollars)
 
 
 
 CUMULATIVEPERIOD FROMINCEPTIONYEAR


YEAR


APRIL 21ENDED


ENDED


2006 TOJUNE 30


JUNE 30


JUNE 302011


2010


2011Cash Provided by (Used for):Operating ActivitiesNet loss for the year

$
(88,253
)

$
(13,061
)

$
(238,412
)Accrued interest


5,217



-



5,217Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued liabilities


63,044



(13,110
)


65,876(19,992
)


(26,171
)


(167,319
)Financing ActivityLoan payable


19,156



-



19,156Due to related parties


880



25,649



41,154Issue of share capital


-



-



107,06020,036



25,649



167,370Net Increase In Cash


44



(522
)


51Cash, Beginning Of Year


7



529



-Cash, End Of Year

$
51


$
7


$
51Supplemental Information of Cash Flow InformationInterest paid

$
-


$
-


$
-Income taxes paid

$
-


$
-


$
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
  F-5
  GOLDEN STAR RESOURCE CORP.
 (An Exploration Stage Company)
 
 STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIENCY) EQUITY
 
 PERIOD FROM INCEPTION, APRIL 21, 2006 TO JUNE 30, 2011
 (Stated in U.S. Dollars)
 
 
 
 COMMON STOCK





DEFICITNUMBER








ACCUMULATED


ACCUMULATEDOF





ADDITIONAL


OTHER


DURING THECOMMON


PAR


PAID-IN


COMPREHENSIVE


EXPLORATIONSHARES


VALUE


CAPITAL


INCOME


STAGE


TOTALBeginning balance, April 21, 2006


-


$
-


$
-


$
-


$
-


$
-April 24, 2006 – shares issued for cash at $0.00001


6,000,000



60



-



-



-



60Net loss for the period


-



-



-



-



(10,440
)


(10,440
)-Balance, June 30, 2006


6,000,000



60



-



-



(10,440
)


(10,380
)-March 28, 2007-shares issued for cash at $0.10


1,070,000



10



106,990



-



-



107,000Net loss for the year


-



-



-



-



(36,562
)


(36,562
)Unrealized foreign exchange gain


-



-



-



6,309



-



6,309Balance, June 30, 2007


7,070,000



70



106,990



6,309



(47,002
)


66,367Net loss for the year


-



-



-



-



(67,681
)


(67,681
)Realized foreign exchange gain


-



-



-



(6,309
)


-



(6,309
)Balance, June 30, 2008


7,070,000



70



106,990



-



(114,683
)


(7,623
)Net loss for the year


















(22,415
)


(22,415
)Balance, June 30, 2009


7,070,000



70



106,990



-



(137,098
)


(30,038
)Net loss for the year


















(13,061
)


(13,061
)Balance, June 30, 2010


7,070,000



70



106,990



-



(150,159
)


(43,099
)Net loss for the year


-



-



-



-



(88,253
)


(88,253
)Balance, June 30, 2011


7,070,000


$
70


$
106,990


$
-


$
(238,412
)

$
(131,352
)
 
 
 
 
 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
  F-6
  1.      NATURE OF OPERATIONS
 
 Organization
 
 The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada, U.S.A., on April 21, 2006.
 
 Exploration Stage Activities
 
 The Company has been in the exploration stage since its formation and is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining claims.  Upon location of a commercial minable reserve, the Company expects to actively prepare the site for its extraction and enter a development stage.  During the fiscal year 2010, the Company’s mineral claim interest was expired and lapsed.  Currently, the Company is actively looking for other mineral properties for its planned business operation.
 
 Going Concern
 
 These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.
 
 The general business strategy of the Company is to acquire and explore mineral properties.  The continued operations of the Company and the recoverability of mineral property costs is dependent upon the existence of economically recoverable mineral reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to complete the development of its properties, and upon future profitable production.  The Company has not generated any revenues or completed development of any properties to date.  Further, the Company has a working capital deficit of $131,352 (2010 - $43,099), has incurred losses of $238,412 since inception, and further significant losses are expected to be incurred in
the exploration and development of its mineral properties.  The Company will require additional funds to meet its obligations and maintain its operations.  There can be no guarantee that the Company will be successful in raising the necessary financing.  Management’s plans in this regard are to raise equity financing as required.
 
 These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from this uncertainty.
 
 
 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
 The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP.  Because a precise determination of many assets and liabilities is dependent upon future events, the preparation of financial statements for a period necessarily involves the use of estimates which have been made using careful judgment.  Actual results may vary from these estimates. The financial statements have, in management’s opinion, been properly prepared within reasonable limits of materiality and within the framework of the significant accounting policies summarized below.
  F-7
  2.      SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
 
 a)      Exploration Stage Enterprise
 
 The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting and according to the provisions of ASC 915 “Accounting and Reporting for Development Stage Enterprises,” as it devotes substantially all of its efforts to acquiring and exploring mineral properties.  Until such properties are acquired and developed, the Company will continue to prepare its financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with entities in the exploration stage.
 
 b)      Cash
 
 The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.
 
 c)      Mineral Property Acquisition Payments
 
 The Company expenses all costs incurred on mineral properties to which it has secured exploration rights prior to the establishment of proven and probable reserves.  If and when proven and probable reserves are determined for a property and a feasibility study prepared with respect to the property, then subsequent exploration and development costs of the property will be capitalized.
 
 The Company regularly performs evaluations of any investment in mineral properties to assess the recoverability and/or the residual value of its investments in these assets.  All long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances change which indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
 
 d)      Exploration Expenditures
 
 The Company follows a policy of expensing exploration expenditures until a production decision in respect of the project and the Company is reasonably assured that it will receive regulatory approval to permit mining operations, which may include the receipt of a legally binding project approval certificate.
 
 
  F-8
  2.      SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
 
 e)      Asset Retirement Obligations
 
 The Company has adopted ASC 410, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”, which requires that an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset be recognized as a liability in the period which it is incurred and becomes determinable, with an offsetting increase in the carrying amount of the associated asset.
 
 The cost of the tangible asset, including the initially recognized ARO, is depleted, such that the cost of the ARO is recognized over the useful life of the asset.  The ARO is recorded at fair value, and accretion expense is recognized over time as the discounted liability is accreted to its expected settlement value.  The fair value of the ARO is measured using expected future cash flow, discounted at the Company’s credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate.  To date, no significant asset retirement obligation exists due to the early stage of exploration.  Accordingly, no liability has been recorded.
 
 f)      Use of Estimates and Assumptions
 
 The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
 g)      Financial Instruments
 
 ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:
 
 Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
 
 Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable; and
 
 Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing.
  F-9
  2.      SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
 
 g)      Financial Instruments, continued
 
 The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilitie, loan payable and due to related parties. Pursuant to ASC 820, the fair value of our cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The Company believes that the recorded values of all of the other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.
 
 The Company’s operations are in Canada, which results in exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates. The financial risk is the risk to the Company’s operations that arise from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates. Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.
 
 h)      Environmental Costs
 
 Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are charged to operations or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are charged to operations. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable, and the cost can be reasonably estimated. Generally, the timing of these accruals coincides with the earlier of completion of a feasibility study or the Company’s commitments to plan of action based on the then known facts.
 
 i)      Income Taxes
 
 The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes” and ASC 740 —Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which require the liability method of accounting for income taxes. The liability method requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.
 
 
  F-10
  2.      SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
 
 j)      Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share
 
 The Company reports basic loss per share in accordance with ASC 260 – “Earnings Per Share”.  Basic loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted loss per share is equal to basic loss per share because there are no potential dilutive securities.
 
 k)      Foreign Currency Translation
 
 The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar.  Transactions in Canadian dollars are translated into U.S. dollars as follows:
 
 i)
monetary items at the rate prevailing at the balance sheet date;
 ii)
non-monetary items at the historical exchange rate;
 iii)
revenue and expense at the average rate in effect during the applicable accounting period.
 
 Gains and losses on translation are recorded in the statement of operations.
 
 3.       RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
 
 In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 regarding fair value measurements and disclosures and improvement in the disclosure about fair value measurements. This ASU requires additional disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of fair value measurements, including a description of the reasons for the transfers.  Further, this ASU requires additional disclosures for the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, requiring presentation of information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, the Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements.
  In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-29, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” This guidance was issued to clarify that pro forma disclosures should be presented as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. The disclosures should also be accompanied by a narrative description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments. This new guidance is effective prospectively for business
combinations consummated on or after the annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its financial statements.
  F-11
   3.       RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
 
 In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”, which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. This guidance amends certain accounting and disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements. Additional disclosure requirements in the update include: (1) for Level 3 fair value measurements, quantitative information about unobservable inputs used, a description of the valuation processes used by the entity, and a qualitative discussion about the sensitivity of the measurements to changes in the unobservable inputs; (2) for an
entity’s use of a nonfinancial asset that is different from the asset’s highest and best use, the reason for the difference; (3) for financial instruments not measured at fair value but for which disclosure of fair value is required, the fair value hierarchy level in which the fair value measurements were determined; and (4) the disclosure of all transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption.
 
 In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. ASU 2011-05 will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2012. This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. In addition, items of other comprehensive income that are reclassified to profit or loss are required to be presented separately on the face of the financial statements. This guidance is intended to increase the prominence of
other comprehensive income in financial statements by requiring that such amounts be presented either in a single continuous statement of income and comprehensive income or separately in consecutive statements of income and comprehensive income. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
 
 Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.
 
 4.     MINERAL CLAIM INTEREST
 
 On May 9, 2006, the Company acquired, from a private company controlled by an officer/shareholder of the Company, a 100% interest in three contiguous mineral claims (later amalgamated into one mineral claim) encompassing over 800 hectares in the Cariboo Mining Division, British Columbia, Canada, for consideration of a cash payment of $10,000.  During the fiscal year 2010, the Company’s mineral claim interest was expired and lapsed.  Currently, the Company is in the process of locating other mineral claim interests for its planned business operations.
 
 5.     CAPITAL STOCK
 
 a)
On April 24, 2006, the Company issued 6,000,000 common shares at $0.00001 per share to two founding shareholders.
 
 b)
On March 28, 2007, the Company closed its public offering and issued additional 1,070,000 common shares at $0.10.
 
 c)
The Company has no stock option plan, warrants or other dilutive securities.
 
 
 6.   DUE TO RELATED PARTIES
 
 Due to related parties represents the amount advanced by companies controlled by a former director and principal shareholder of the Company.  The amount is unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.
 
 $9,875 (2010 - $nil) of office expenses were charged by an officer of the Company for expenses incurred in providing the service to the Company.
 
 
 7.      LOAN PAYABLE
 
 Loan payable consists of followings:
 
 $45,540 (2010 - $nil) was payable to ATP Corporate Services Corp. which $40,274 was the result of the assignment of amounts due to related parties on July 1, 2010.  Commencing July 1, 2010, this loan payable bears interest at 12% per annual which is unsecured and due on demand.  During the year ended 2011, the Company incurred and accrued interest expense of $4,563 (2010 - $ Nil)
 
 During the fiscal year 2011, 0858604 B.C. Ltd. (a non related party) advanced the Company loan amount of $10,384.  The loan amount is unsecured, interest-bearing at 12% per annual and due on demand.  On June 30, 2011, 0858604 B.C. Ltd. assigned and transferred the related principal and accrued interest totaling of $11,630 to 0787129 B.C. Ltd.  As of June 30, 2011, the amount payable to 0787129 B.C. Ltd. is unsecured, interest-bearing at 12%  and due June 30, 2012.
 
 During the fiscal year 2011, Bobcat Development (a non-related party) advanced the Company loan amount of $11,798.  The loan amount is unsecured, interest-bears at 12% per annual and due on demand.  On June 30, 2011, Bobcat Development assigned and the transfer the related principal and accrued interest totaling of $13,214 to 0787129 B.C. Ltd. As of June 30, 2011, the amount payable to 0787129 B.C. Ltd. is unsecured,  interest-bearing at 12% and due June 30, 2012.
 
  F-12
  8.   INCOME TAXES
 
 a)
A reconciliation of income tax expense to the amount computed at the statutory rate is as follows:
 
 2011


2010Net loss for the year

$
(88,253
)

$
(13,061
)Statutory tax rate


35
%


35
%Computed expected (benefit) income taxes


(30,880
)


(4,570
)Income tax benefit not recognized


30,880



4,570$
-


$
-
 
 b)
Significant components of deferred income tax assets are as follows:
 
 2011


2010Operating losses carried forward

$
83,000


$
53,000Valuation allowance


(83,000
)


(53,000
)$
-


$
-
 
 c)
The Company has incurred operating losses of approximately $238,000 which, if unutilized, will expire through to 2031  Future tax benefits, which may arise as a result of these losses, have not been recognized in these financial statements, and have been offset by a valuation allowance.  The following table lists the fiscal year in which the loss was incurred and the expiration date of the operating loss carry forwards:
 
 INCOME TAX OPERATINGLOSS CARRY FORWARDSEXPIRATIONAMOUNT


DATE$
88,000



203113,000



203022,000



202968,000



202837,000



202710,000



2026Total income tax operating loss carry forward

$
238,000
  
 9.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
 
 On July 1, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement for services relating to corporate and financial affairs with a non-related party for a term of 24 months, unless terminated earlier, for a consideration of $30,000 a year and payable $2,500 per month. The agreement will automatically renew for a further 24 months unless one of the party gives a notice of nonrenewal. During the fiscal year 2011, the Company incurred and accrued a total consulting fee of $30,000 in connection with the consulting agreement.
  On July 1, 2010, the Company entered into an administrative services agreement with ATP Corporate Services for providing administration services over a term of 24 months for a consideration of $1,500 per month. Pursuant to the administrative services agreement, ATP Corporate is also entitled for reimbursement of office and rent expenses incurred. During the year 2011, the Company incurred and accrued a total of $18,000, $6,000 and $6,000 for the administrative expense, office expense and rent expense, respectively.





F-13








PART III




ITEM 9.     CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.




a)
On July 7, 2011, Change Lee LLP (“Chang Lee”) resigned as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm as Chang Lee was merged with MNP LLP (“MNP”). Most of the professional staff of Chang Lee continued with MNP either as employees or partners of MNP and will continue their practice with MNP. On Date, the Company, through and with the approval of its Board of Director, engaged MNP as its independent registered public accounting firm.
  b)
Prior to engaging MNP, the Company did not consult with MNP regarding the application of accounting principles to a specific completed or contemplated transaction or regarding the type of audit opinions that might be rendered by MNP on the Company’s financial statements, and MNP did not provide any written or oral advice that was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any such accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue.
  c)
The reports of Chang Lee regarding the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and during the period from June 30, 2010 to July 7, 2011, the date of resignation, there were no disagreements with Chang Lee on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Chang Lee would have caused it
to make reference to such disagreement in its reports.







ITEM 9A.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.





EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES





As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, being June 30, 2011, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our company’s disclosure controls and procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as at the end of the period covered by this report. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during
our most recent fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.





Disclosure controls and procedures and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time period specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.





Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of the controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if
any, within our company have been detected.





Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting





Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance with respect to the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures which pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.








8





ITEM 9A.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES - continued





Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this evaluation under the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2011.





This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm with respect to internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission which permit us to provide only our management’s report in this Annual Report.





Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting





There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified during the year ended June 30, 2011 which have materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.





ITEM 9B.   OTHER INFORMATION





None.





ITEM 10.     DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS.





Our directors serve until their successor is elected and qualified. Our officers are elected by the board of directors to a term of one (1) year and serve until their successor is duly elected and qualified, or until they are removed from office. The board of directors has no nominating, auditing or compensation committees.





The names, addresses, ages and positions of our present officers and directors are set forth below:





Name and Address
Age
Position(s)Steven Bergstrom
63
President, Principal Executive Officer and a member3390 Toopal Drive

of the Board of DirectorsOceanside, California   92058Marilyn Miller
46
Principal Accounting Officer, Principal Financial3390 Toopal Drive

Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and a member of ourOceanside, California    92058

board of directors





The persons named above have held their offices/positions are expected to hold their offices/positions until the next annual meeting of our stockholders.





Background of Officers and Directors





On October 17, 2007, Steven Bergstrom was appointed President, Principal Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors. Since April 1985, Mr. Bergstrom has been serving as President for Triad Exploration Inc. a private Washington based, exploration company. He founded Triad Exploration to exploit opportunities in the base and precious metal mining industry. Triad Exploration specializes in the acquisition of base and precious metal mining properties and also provides consulting services to other mineral exploration companies. From December 1986 until February 2001, Mr. Bergstrom was Vice President of Mining Operations for Triumph Corporation, a private Colorado exploration company headquartered in Spokane
Valley, Washington. Triumph Corporation is a precious metals exploration company. Mr. Bergstrom currently sits on the Board of Directors of Triumph Corporation. From September 1999 to March 2003, Mr. Bergstrom was a Director for Nevak Mining Ltd., a private Nevada based, gold producing company no longer in operation. The Mud Creek Mine on the Seward Peninsula in Alaska was the once operational mine of Nevak Mining. From October 1979 to November 1984, Mr. Bergstrom founded and served as President for International Bullion Inc., a private Nevada based, exploration company no longer in operation. International Bullion was a mining company that built, operated, and sold a heap leach gold project in Nevada. The company expanded it operations to include the direct importation of precious metal concentrates and precipitates that were subsequently processed and sold to refineries. Steve
Bergstrom also serves as President for Silver Hill Mines Inc, a Nevada exploration company headquartered in Greenacres, Washington. He is President of Alliance Aviation LLC, a Nevada aviation services company headquartered in Laguna Niguel, California; Alliance Aviation's primary aviation service will be charter operations for corporate clients. Other aviation services provided will be aircraft leasing, maintenance, and finance. He is President of Western Locators LLC, a Harrison, Idaho based exploration services and land services company; Western Locators provides exploration services such as claim staking, filing services, property acquisition consulting, land status reports, and other services necessary for the evaluation and acquisition of potential mineral properties. He is a Managing Member of AuTech LLC, a Nevada based gold extraction technology company with headquarters in
Verndale, Washington. AuTech is involved in acquiring and developing a proprietary process related to the extraction of gold from ores. All of these companies are private companies. He holds a bachelors degree in Economics from North Dakota State University(1970), has served as an E-4 in the US Army at West Point and he is a Vietnam Veteran.





9





ITEM 10.     DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS - continued





On September 5, 2008, Marilyn Miller was appointed principal accounting officer, principal financial officer, secretary/treasurer and a member of the board of directors. Since January 21, 2011 Marilyn Miller has been a director and CFO of Mega Copper Ltd. Mega Copper Ltd. does not file reports with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, but is listed for trading on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol MCU.V. Mega Copper Ltd. is in the business of mining exploration.. Since October 2010, Ms. Miller has been the President and director of La Imperial Resources Inc. La Imperial Resources Inc does not file reports with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, but is listed for trading
on the Canadian National Stock Exchange under the symbol LAI.C. La Imperial is in the business of mining exploration in Mexico. In December 2008 Ms Miller became a director of International LMM Ventures Corp. International LMM Ventures Corp did not file reports with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, but was listed for trading on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol LMM.H. International LMM was in the business of mining and energy exploration.  Ms. Miller resigned as a director of the Company in May 2009. . In July 2007, Ms. Miller became a director of Tapestry Resource Corp. Tapestry Resource Corp. was engaged in the business of mining exploration. Tapestry Resource Corp did not file reports with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, but was listed for trading on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol TPV.H. Ms. Miller resigned as a
director of the Company in August 2010. Since June 2007, Ms. Miller has been the President, Secretary, Treasurer and a director of Goldstream Mining Corp., a private company. Since April 2007, Ms. Miller has been President, Secretary Treasurer and a director of Royal Mining Corp., a private company Ms. Miller became a director of Cierra Pacific Ventures. In January 2007, Cierra Pacific Ventures was in the business of mining and energy exploration. Cierra Pacific did not file reports with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, but traded on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol CIZ.H. Ms. Miller resigned as a director of the Company in April 2009. Since May 2005, Marilyn Miller has been the Vice President of Marathon Gold Corp. and a member of the board of directors. Marathon Gold is in the business of gold mining and exploration   Ms. Miller is
self-employed as a GIA Graduate Gemologist Consultant since October, 2001. The Gemological Institute of America (GIA) is the world’s foremost respected authority in gemology. Marilyn Miller graduated as a Graduate Gemologist from GIA in May, 2001. Marilyn Miller previously worked as an Investment Associate with REFCO Canada Corporation in Toronto, Ontario from February 1995 to June 2000. Marilyn Miller was an Investment Associate for RBC Dominion Securities, in Toronto, Ontario from September 1992 to January 1995. Marilyn Miller attended the University of Toronto, September 1988 to May 1992.





Conflicts of Interest





At the present time, we do not foresee a direct conflict of interest because we do not intend to acquire any additional properties. The only conflict that we foresee is Mr. Bergstrom’s and Ms. Miller’s devotion of time to projects that do not involve us. In the event that Mr. Bergstrom and Ms. Miller cease devoting time to our operations, they have agreed to resign as officers and directors. We have no policies relating to conflicts of interest.





Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings





Other than as described in this section, to our knowledge, during the past five years, no present or former director or executive officer of our company: (1) filed a petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law, nor had a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer appointed by a court for the business or present of such a person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer within two years before the time of such filing; (2) was convicted in a criminal proceeding or named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and
other minor offenses); (3) was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from or otherwise limiting the following activities: (i) acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment advisor, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director of any investment company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity; (ii) engaging in any type of business practice; (iii) engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of federal or state
securities laws or federal commodity laws; (4) was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any federal or state authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described above under this Item, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity; (5) was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Securities and Exchange Commission to have violated any federal or state securities law and the judgment in subsequently reversed, suspended or vacate; (6) was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been
subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated.





Audit Committee and Charter





We have a separately-designated audit committee of the board. Audit committee functions are performed by our board of directors. None of our directors are deemed independent. All directors also hold positions as our officers. Our audit committee is responsible for: (1) selection and oversight of our independent accountant; (2) establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters; (3) establishing procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding accounting and auditing matters; (4) engaging outside advisors;
and, (5) funding for the outside auditory and any outside advisors engagement by the audit committee. A copy of our audit committee charter was filed as Exhibit 99.2 to our Form 10-KSB, on September 28, 2007. The audit committee met four (4) times during the year.





10





ITEM 10.     DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS - continued





Audit Committee Financial Expert





None of our directors or officers have the qualifications or experience to be considered a financial expert. We believe the cost related to retaining a financial expert at this time is prohibitive. Further, because of our limited operations, we believe the services of a financial expert are not warranted.





Code of Ethics





We have adopted a corporate code of ethics. We believe our code of ethics is reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct; provide full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in public reports; comply with applicable laws; ensure prompt internal reporting of code violations; and provide accountability for adherence to the code. A copy of the code of ethics has been filed as Exhibit 14.1 to our Form 10-KSB, on September 28, 2007.





Disclosure Committee and Charter





We have a disclosure committee and disclosure committee charter. Our disclosure committee is comprised of all of our officers and directors. The purpose of the committee is to provide assistance to the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer in fulfilling their responsibilities regarding the identification and disclosure of material information about us and the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of our financial reports. A copy of the disclosure committee charter is filed as Exhibit 99.3 to our Form 10-KSB, on September 28, 2007.





Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





As of the date of this report, we are subject to section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





ITEM 11.     EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION





The following table sets forth the compensation paid by us to our officers from inception on May 26, 2005 through June 30, 2011. The compensation addresses all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the named executive officers for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. This information includes the dollar value of base salaries, bonus awards and number of stock options granted, and certain other compensation, if any.





Non-Equity


Non-QualifiedIncentive


Deferred


AllPlan


Compen-


OtherStock


Option


Compen-


sation


Compen-Name and


Salary


Bonus


Awards


Awards


sation


Earnings


sation


TotalPrincipal Position
Year

(US$)


(US$)


(US$)


(US$)


(US$)


(US$)


(US$)


(US$)(a)
(b)

(c)


(d)


(e)


(f)


(g)


(h)


(i)


(j)Steven Bergstrom
2011


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



0President & CEO
2010


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



02009


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



02008


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



0Marilyn Miller
2011


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



0CAO, CFO &
2010


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



0Secretary/Treasurer
2009


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



02008


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



0Egil Livgard
2011


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



0(resigned 10/07)
2010


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



02009


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



02008


0



0



0



0



0



0



9,855



9,855Kathrine MacDonald
2011


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



0(resigned 9/08)
2010


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



0


2009


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



02008


0



0



0



0



0



0



0



0









11





ITEM 11.     EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION - continued





The following table sets forth information with respect to compensation paid by us to our directors during the last completed fiscal year. Our fiscal year end is June 30.





Director Compensation Table(a)

(b)


(c)


(d)


(e)


(f)


(g)


(h)Change inPensionValue andFees








Non-Equity


Non-Qualified


AllEarned








Incentive


Deferred


Otheror Paid


Stock


Option


Plan


Compensation


Compen-in Cash


Awards


Awards


Compensation


Earnings


sation


TotalName

($)


($)


($)


($)


($)


($)


($)Steven Bergstrom


0



0



0



0



0



0



0Marilyn Miller


0



0



0



0



0



0



0Egil Livgard (resigned)


0



0



0



0



0



0



0Kathrine MacDonald

(resigned)


0



0



0



0



0



0



0





We have not paid any salaries in 2011 and we do not anticipate paying any salaries at any time in 2012. We will not begin paying salaries until we have adequate funds to do so. Our directors do not receive any compensation for serving as members of the board of directors.





On July 1, 2010, we entered into a consulting agreement with our director Marilyn Miller for a term of 24 months for a fee of $2,500 per month and was cancelled on the same date.  As at June 30, 2011 no consulting was charges by related party.





There are no other stock option plans, retirement, pension, or profit sharing plans for the benefit of our officers and directors other than as described herein.





To date, we have not entered into employment contracts with any of our officers and do not intend to enter into any employment contracts until we have adequate funds to do so.





Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards





We do not have any long-term incentive plans that provide compensation intended to serve as incentive for performance.





Indemnification





Under our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the corporation, we may indemnify an officer or director who is made a party to any proceeding, including a law suit, because of his position, if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in our best interest. We may advance expenses incurred in defending a proceeding. To the extent that the officer or director is successful on the merits in a proceeding in which he is to be indemnified, we must indemnify him against all expenses incurred, including attorney's fees. With respect to a derivative action, indemnity may be made only for expenses actually and reasonably incurred in defending the proceeding, and if the officer or director is
judged liable, only by a court order. The indemnification is intended to be to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada.





Regarding indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, which may be permitted to directors or officers under Nevada law, we are informed that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, indemnification is against public policy, as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.








12





ITEM 12.   SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
 
 The following table sets forth, as of the date of this report, the total number of shares owned beneficially by each of our directors, officers and key employees, individually and as a group, and the present owners of 5% or more of our total outstanding shares.





The stockholder listed below has direct ownership of his shares and possesses sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares.





Name and Address




Percentage ofBeneficial Ownership [1]

Number of Shares


OwnershipSteven Bergstrom


0



0
%3390 Toopal DriveOceanside, California    92058Marilyn Miller


3,000,000



42.43
%3390 Toopal DriveOceanside, California    92058All Officers and Directors


3,000,000



42.43
%as a Group (2 persons)Kathrine MacDonald [2]


3,000,000



42.43
%850 West Hastings Street, Suite 201Vancouver, British Columbia   V5C 1E1





[1]
The persons named above "promoters" as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Mr. Bergstrom and Ms. Miller are the only "promoters" of our company.[2]
Ms. MacDonald holds title to her common stock in the name of Dimac Capital Corp., a British Columbia corporation which she owns and controls.





Future Sales by Existing Stockholders





A total of 6,000,000 shares of our stock are currently owned by one of our officers and directors, Marilyn Miller, and one individual. 3,000,000 shares of common stock were issued to Dimac Capital Corp., a corporation owned and controlled by Kathrine MacDonald, our former officer and director, in April 2006. Another 3,000,000 shares of common stock were issued to Marilyn Miller, one of our officers and directors. The 6,000,000 shares are restricted securities, as defined in Rule 144 of the Rules and Regulations of the SEC promulgated under the Securities Act. Under Rule 144, the shares can be publicly sold, subject to volume restrictions and restrictions on the manner of sale, commencing one year after their
acquisition. Rule 144 provides that a person may not sell more than 1% of the total outstanding shares in any three month period and the sales must be sold either in a brokers’ transaction or in a transaction directly with a market maker.





Ms. MacDonald and Ms. Miller will likely sell a portion of their stock, if the market price goes above $0.10. If they sell their stock into the market, the sales may cause the market price of the stock to drop. In general, sales of shares held by officers or large shareholders, after applicable restrictions expire, could have a depressive effect on the market price of our common stock.





Because our officers, directors and a principle shareholder control us, regardless of the number of shares sold, your ability to change the course of our operations is eliminated. As such, there is no value attributable to the right to vote. This could result in a reduction in value to the shares you own because of the ineffective voting power.





No common stock is subject to outstanding options, warrants or securities convertible into common stock.





ITEM 13.     CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE





In April 2006, 3,000,000 shares of common stock were issued to Dimac Capital Corp., a corporation owned and controlled by Kathrine MacDonald, our former officer and director. Additionally, 3,000,000 shares of common stock were issued to Marilyn Miller, one of our officers and directors. These transactions were accounted for as acquisitions of shares of common stock for consideration of $30.





Mr. Bergstrom and Ms. Miller are our only promoters. They have not received or will they receive anything of value from us, directly or indirectly, in their capacities as promoters.





During the fiscal year 2010, Dimac Capital Corp. advanced $9,274 to cover our operating expenses.  On June 1, 2010, we assigned the total amount of $25,176 owed to Dimac Capital Corp. to ATP Corporate Services Corp.





During the fiscal year 2010, a company related to Dimac Capital Corp. advanced $1,431 to cover our operating expenses.  On June 1, 2010, we assigned the amount to ATP Corporate Services Corp.





During the fiscal year 2010, a company controlled by Marilyn Miller advanced $13,669 to cover our operating expenses.  On June 1, 2010, we assigned the amount to ATP Corporate Services Corp.




During the fiscal year 2011, $9,875 (2010 - $nil) of office expenses were charged by an officer of the Company for expenses incurred in providing the service to the Company.


13








ITEM 14.     PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES





(1) Audit Fees





The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for our audit of annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our Form 10-Qs or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years was:





2011

$
7,500

MNP LLP2010

$
7,000

Chang Lee





(2) Audit-Related Fees





The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported in the preceding paragraph:





2011

$
4,550

Chang Lee2010

$
4,000

Chang Lee





(3) Tax Fees





The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning was:





2011

$
0

MNP LLP2010

$
0

Chang Lee





(4) All Other Fees





The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for the products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) was:





2011

$
0

MNP LLP2010

$
0

Chang Lee





(5) Our audit committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c)(7)(i) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X were that the audit committee pre-approve all accounting related activities prior to the performance of any services by any accountant or auditor.





(6) The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit our financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full time, permanent employees was 0%.














14








PART IV





ITEM 15.     EXHIBITS





The following is a complete list of exhibits filed as part of this annual report:





Incorporated by referenceFiledExhibit
Document Description
Form
Date
Number
herewith3.1
Articles of Incorporation.
SB-2

3.13.2
Bylaws.
SB-2

3.24.1
Specimen Stock Certificate.
SB-2

4.114.1
Code of Ethics.
10-KSB
9/28/07
14.131.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to



X15d-15(e), promulgated under the Securities andExchange Act of 1934, as amended.31.2
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to



X15d-15(e), promulgated under the Securities andExchange Act of 1934, as amended.32.1
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as



Xadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer).32.2
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as



Xadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer).99.2
Audit Committee Charter.
10-KSB
9/28/07
99.299.3
Disclosure Committee Charter.
10-KSB
9/28/07
99.3






































15








SIGNATURES








In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized on this October 6, 2011.

















GOLDEN STAR RESOURCES CORPORATION(Registrant)BY:
/s/ Steven BergstromSteven BergstromPresident, Principal Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors.BY:
/s/ Marilyn MillerMarilyn MillerPrincipal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary/Treasurer and a member of the Board of Directors.
















































































16








EXHIBIT INDEX





Incorporated by referenceFiledExhibit
Document Description
Form
Date
Number
herewith3.1
Articles of Incorporation.
SB-2

3.13.2
Bylaws.
SB-2

3.24.1
Specimen Stock Certificate.
SB-2

4.114.1
Code of Ethics.
10-KSB
9/28/07
14.131.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to



X15d-15(e), promulgated under the Securities andExchange Act of 1934, as amended.31.2
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to



X15d-15(e), promulgated under the Securities andExchange Act of 1934, as amended.32.1
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as



Xadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer).32.2
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as



Xadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer).99.2
Audit Committee Charter.
10-KSB
9/28/07
99.299.3
Disclosure Committee Charter.
10-KSB
9/28/07
99.3



































17