alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

1

See Edwards v. United States, 114 F.3d 1083 (11TH Cir. 1997) (district courts must treat notices of

appeal in Section 2255 actions as applications for certificates of appealability).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 5:98cr8/LAC

MARCNEL ST. GEORGE

ORDER

The defendant has filed a notice of appeal (doc. 465) which this court construes as

a request for a certificate of appealability.1 Defendant appeals the court’s denial of his

Rule 60(b) motion. (Doc. 464). Unless a certificate of appealability is issued, the

defendant may not take an appeal from the final order denying a Rule 60(b) motion.

Gonzalez v. Secretary of Department of Corrections, 317 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11th Cir. 2003).

A certificate of appealability should not issue in the appeal from the denial of a Rule 60(b)

motion in a habeas case unless the petitioner/defendant shows, at a minimum, that it is

debatable among jurists of reason whether the district court abused its discretion, see

Mobley v. Head, 306 F.3d 1096, 1097 (11th Cir. 2002) (“This Court reviews a denial of a

60(b) motion for an abuse of discretion.”). Because the court finds the defendant has not

made the requisite showing for the reasons stated in the court’s order denying the motion

(doc. 464), his request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Defendant has not filed

a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court finds that the appeal is not

taken in good faith and he is not otherwise entitled to so proceed. Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3).

Case 5:98-cr-00008-LC-MD Document 470 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 3:96cr57/RV; 3:03cv2/RV/MD

Therefore, defendant shall pay the $455.00 filing fee within thirty days.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of October, 2007.

s/L. A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:98-cr-00008-LC-MD Document 470 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 2
Memorandum

From: William Swietlik, USEPA/OW/OST

(202) 566-1129, Swietlik.william@epa.gov

To: Public Docket for the Preliminary 2016 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan

EPA Docket Number EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0665 (http://www.regulations.gov)

Date: May 24, 2016

Re: Docket EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0170 Incorporated by Reference

EPA is directed by sections 304(b) and 304(g) of the Clean Water Act to annually review, 

and revise if appropriate, all existing effluent guidelines. Each successive annual review is built

upon the results of earlier reviews. Specifically, the information and data collected in the docket 

supporting the 2014 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan (August 4, 2015; 80 FR 46280) informs 

and supports the Preliminary 2016 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan. Therefore, the following 

docket, “Preliminary and Final 2014 Effluent Guidelines Plan and 2013/2014 Annual Review,” 

EPA Docket Number: OW-2014-0170, is incorporated by reference through this memorandum 

into the public record for the 2016 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan, EPA Docket Number: 

OW-2015-0665.
#### In the Matter of John F. Power, Jr., Petitioner, v. Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, Special Term, Part XII, et al., Respondents.

Application withdrawn and petition dismissed as moot. No opinion. Concur—■ McGivern, J. P., Markewich, Nunez, McNally and Steuer, JJ.
# C_2014118EN.01000301.xml

| 17.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/3

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 April 2014

appointing a member and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for Croatia

2014/C 118/02

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Decision 2003/C 218/01 of 22 July 2003 setting up an Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work (1), and in particular Article 3 thereof,

1

Having regard to the list of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 22 April 2013 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period from 22 April 2013 until 28 February 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 22 April 2013 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period from 22 April 2013 until 28 February 2016.

2

| (2) | The Government of Croatia has submitted further nominations for several posts to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Government of Croatia has submitted further nominations for several posts to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are appointed as member and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 28 February 2016:

TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES:

TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES:

| Country | Member | Alternate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Croatia | Mr Zdenko MUČNJAK | Ms Gordana PALAJSA
  Mr Marko PALADA |

Country

Member

Alternate

Croatia

Mr Zdenko MUČNJAK

Ms Gordana PALAJSA

Mr Marko PALADA

Article 2

The members and alternate members not yet nominated will be appointed by the Council at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 14 April 2014.

For the Council

The President

A. TSAFTARIS

---

(1)  OJ C 218, 13.9.2003, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 120, 26.4.2013, p. 7.

2

---
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2887 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on difenoconazole. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 

difenoconazole. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIFENOCONAZOLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.12 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 difenoconazole) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2887 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 11-3 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

ANTHONY D. WHITE, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 3:19cv3591/LAC/EMT 

SECRETARY AND REPRESENTATIVES 

OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendants. 

__________________________/ 

O R D E R

 The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on March 

9, 2020 (ECF No. 10). Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the 

timely filed objections (doc 11). 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections 

thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 

 1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

10) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 
Page 2 of 2 

Case No. 3:19cv3591/LAC/EMT

2. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Captain “B” are DISMISSED as 

follows: 

 a. Plaintiff’s access-to-courts claim against Defendant Captain “B” 

is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may 

be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and § 1915A(b)(1); and 

 b. Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendant Captain “B,” 

to the extent Plaintiff asserts one, is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff’s 

clearly asserting it in a second amended complaint. 

 3. Plaintiff’s claims against the remaining Defendants (Defendants Inch, 

Britton, Stewart, “P.R.,” “M.T.,” “M.S.,” and “K.K.”) are DISMISSED with 

prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and § 1915A(b)(1). 

 4. This case is referred to the Chief Magistrate Judge for issuance of an 

order setting a deadline for Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint asserting 

only a claim of excessive force against Defendant Captain “B.” 

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of April, 2020. 

 

 LACEY A. COLLIER 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of 3DIcon Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin Keating, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Date:  March 31, 2011
By:
/s/ Martin KeatingMartin KeatingChief Executive Officer (Principal

Executive and Principal Accounting

Officer)
```

[House Report 107-774]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-774

======================================================================

 
 WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO THE 
  SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES 
                               COMMITTEE

                                _______
                                

  November  13 (legislative day, November 12), 2002.--Referred to the 
                House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 601]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 601, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver 
to any special rule reported on the legislative day of 
Wednesday, November 13, 2002, providing for consideration or 
disposition of a bill to establish the Department of Homeland 
Security, and for other purposes.


```
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SHELDON LEE HUTCHINS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5952-MCR-HTC

DAVID MICHAEL ROWELL, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER

This civil rights case is before the Court upon referral from the clerk. The 

parties have filed their pretrial materials, and the case is ready for trial. See Doc. 

204 (Plaintiff’s pretrial materials); Doc. 205 (Defendants’ pretrial materials).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

The clerk shall refer this case to the District Judge for trial.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2024.

s/ Hope Thai Cannon

HOPE THAI CANNON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1778

In re: JOSEPH CARPINO,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition.

(CA-01-80)

Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: November 15, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Carpino, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Carpino petitions this court for a writ of mandamus or

prohibition, asking us to order the Circuit Court of Ohio County,

West Virginia, to address several alleged errors in its resolution

of Carpino’s underlying litigation against Wheeling Volkswagen

Subaru. Mandamus relief is only available when the petitioner has

a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan

Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a

drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary situations.

Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). 

Carpino has no right to the relief he seeks because a federal

circuit court cannot exercise appellate review over state court

decisions. See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman,

460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983). Moreover, Carpino had an available remedy

because he could have appealed the decision with the state court

system. See In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826-27 (4th Cir. 1987).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We deny

Carpino’s motion for due process, in which he challenges the

constitutionality of a West Virginia magistrate’s rule, because

this petition is not the appropriate forum for such a challenge.

We further deny Carpino’s motion for discovery. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
3

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated May 28, 2010 and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on June 8, 2010, (75 FR 32506), Boehringer Ingelheim Chemicals, Inc., 2820 N. Normandy Drive, Petersburg, Virginia 23805-9372, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleAmphetamine (1100)
IILisdexamfetamine (1205)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IIMethadone (9250)
IIMethadone Intermediate (9254)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for sale to its customers for formulation into finished pharmaceuticals. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Boehringer Ingelheim Chemicals, Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Boehringer Ingelheim Chemicals, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: November 19, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2010-30352 Filed 12-2-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
06/01/2011 14:18 8163293771 FAA ACE 7 PAGE 01/02 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON. D.C 

IN THE MATTER OR 

GOJET AIRLINES, LLC 

(VD GEAR PINS) 

I lv: i NT OF 

FAA Docket No. CPIOCEOO63 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0025 

ri,'. T1,0 •. I 

5 O |: 28 

NOTICE OF APPEAL ERRATA 

COMES now the Federal Aviation Administration, by and through his Regional Counsel, 

for the Central Region, and hereby corrects the FAA Docket No. CP10CE0009 as it is found on 

the Notice of Appeal filed on May 31,2011, so that it now reads CP10CE0003. 

Dated this 1" day of June, 2011. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

A. Lester Haizlip 

RegionalCounsel 

Br // , 

7' 

David Kessler 

Federal Aviation Administration 

901 Locust Street, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106 

ATTORNEY FOR COMPLAINANT 
06/01/2011 14:18 8163293771 FAA ACE 7 PAGE 02/02 

In the Matter of GoJet AirUnes. LLC. FAA Docket No. CP10CE0003; DMS FAA-2010-0025 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date sent the Agency's Notice of Appeal Errata, via 

methods listed, to below named addressees: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearmg Docket Clerk AGC 430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

(Original and 1 copy via regular mail and Fax to 202-493-5142) 

David J. A. Hayes, m, Esq. 

Vice President & General Counsel 

Trans States Airlines Inc 

11495 Natural Bridge Rd., Suite 303 

Bridgeton, MO 63044 

(1 copy via regular mail) 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwm 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El 2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

(1 copy via regular mail) 

Dated this 1"^ day of June 2011 

>avid Kessler 

Attorney
Certification
         I, Susan Mills, certify that:

          1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all
reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Mortgage
Loan Trust 2006-NC2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

          2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic
reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

          3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
servicing and other information required to be provided under
Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in
the Exchange Act periodic reports;

          4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic
reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under
the servicing agreement; and

          5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance
with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
this report on Form 10-K.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably
relied on information provided to me by the following
unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., New Century
Mortgage Corporation and Citibank, N.A.

                                   Date April 2, 2007
                                   CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN
                                   TRUST INC.

                                   By: /s/ Susan Mills
                                   ------------------------
                                   Name: Susan Mills
                                   Title: Vice President
                                   Date: April 2, 2007
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06cr169-WKW

)

CLIFF JOHNSON, )

DEMETRIA MILLS and )

JAMES CALVIN TALLEY )

DECLARATION OF PUBLICATION

Notice of Criminal Forfeiture was posted on an official

government internet site (www.forfeiture.gov) for at least 30

consecutive days, beginning on January 7, 2008, as required by Rule

G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime

and Asset Forfeiture Claims, as evidenced by Attachment 1.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true

and correct this 19 day of February, 2008. th

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/Tommie Brown Hardwick

TOMMIE BROWN HARDWICK

Assistant United States Attorney

Bar Number: ASB4152 W86T

131 Clayton Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: tommie.hardwick@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 566 Filed 02/19/2008 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 19, 2008, I electronically

filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF

system which will send notification of such filing to all counsel

of record.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Tommie Brown Hardwick

TOMMIE BROWN HARDWICK

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 566 Filed 02/19/2008 Page 2 of 2