FORM 10-QSB--QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                     THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                        Quarterly or Transitional Report



                   U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

              For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2001


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


             For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14099


                      CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
      (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                              94-2940204
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                       Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                   (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)


Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act  during the  preceding  12 months (or for such
shorter period that the Partnership was required to file such reports),  and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No___



<PAGE>



                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

a)

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                       (in thousands, except unit data)

                               September 30, 2001

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $  162
   Receivables and deposits                                                      11
   Other assets                                                                 134
   Investment property:
      Land                                                    $ 916
      Buildings and related personal property                 10,009
                                                              10,925
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (5,121)         5,804

                                                                            $ 6,111
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficit) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 217
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           65
   Accrued property taxes                                                        95
   Other liabilities                                                            139
   Mortgage note payable                                                      5,370

Partners' (Deficit) Capital
   General partner                                             $ (2)
   Special limited partners                                      (84)
   Limited partners (181,300 units issued and
      outstanding)                                               311            225

                                                                            $ 6,111

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

b)

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                     (in thousands, except per unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                          Three Months               Nine Months
                                       Ended September 30,       Ended September 30,
                                        2001         2000         2001         2000

   Revenues:
<S>                                    <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
      Rental income                    $ 411        $ 423        $ 1,183      $ 1,281
      Other income                         51           46           141          125
          Total revenues                  462          469         1,324        1,406

   Expenses:
      Operating                           283          200           671          588
      General and administrative           41           67           183          152
      Depreciation                        107          104           325          325
      Interest                            106          109           313          371
      Property taxes                       19           34            74          109
          Total expenses                  556          514         1,566        1,545

   Net loss                            $ (94)       $ (45)       $ (242)      $ (139)

   Net loss allocated to
      general partner (0.2%)            $ --         $ --         $ --         $ --

   Net loss allocated to
      limited partners (99.8%)            (94)         (45)         (242)        (139)

                                       $ (94)       $ (45)       $ (242)      $ (139)

   Net loss per limited
      partnership unit                $ (0.51)     $ (0.25)      $ (1.33)     $ (0.77)
   Distribution per limited
      partnership unit                  $ --         $ --        $ 2.83        $ --

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

c)

                      CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
       CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIT) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                       (in thousands, except unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                       Limited                Special
                                     Partnership   General    Limited    Limited
                                        Units      Partner    Partners   Partners    Total

<S>                                    <C>           <C>        <C>      <C>        <C>
Original capital contributions         181,808       $ 1        $ --     $45,452    $45,453

Partners' (deficit) capital
  at December 31, 2000                 181,300       $ (1)     $ (70)    $ 1,072    $ 1,001

Amortization of timing
  difference                                --          --          6         (6)        --

Distributions to partners                   --          (1)       (20)      (513)      (534)

Net loss for the nine
  months ended September 30, 2001           --          --         --       (242)      (242)

Partners' (deficit) capital
  at September 30, 2001                181,300       $ (2)     $ (84)     $ 311      $ 225

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

d)

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Nine Months Ended
                                                                   September 30,
                                                                  2001        2000
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>         <C>
  Net loss                                                       $ (242)     $ (139)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
   cash provided by operating activities:
   Depreciation                                                     325          325
   Amortization of loan costs                                         5            5
  Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                       10           86
      Other assets                                                   (8)           3
      Accounts payable                                              165          (23)
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                           (17)           4
      Accrued property taxes                                        (53)         (19)
      Other liabilities                                              73         (104)
         Net cash provided by operating activities                  258          138

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (266)        (234)
  Net deposits to restricted escrows                                 --          135
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (266)         (99)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                (106)         (83)
  Loan costs paid                                                    --          (35)
  Distributions paid to partners                                   (534)      (2,297)
         Net cash used in financing activities                     (640)      (2,415)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                          (648)      (2,376)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    810        3,032
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                       $ 162        $ 656

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                         $ 274        $ 366

Distributions to partners of  approximately  $2,297,000 were accrued at December
31, 1999 and paid in January 2000.

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

e)
                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying  unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements of Consolidated
Capital  Properties VI (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial  statements.  In the opinion of ConCap  Equities,  Inc.  ("CEI" or the
"General  Partner"),  all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating
results  for the  three  and nine  months  ended  September  30,  2001,  are not
necessarily  indicative  of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year
ending  December 31, 2001. For further  information,  refer to the  consolidated
financial  statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2000.  The General
Partner  is  an  affiliate  of  Apartment   Investment  and  Management  Company
("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.

Principles of Consolidation

The  Partnership's  financial  statements  include  the  accounts  of  Colony of
Springdale Associates, Ltd. ("Colony Associates"),  which holds fee title to the
Colony of Springdale  Apartments.  The results of its operations are included in
the   Partnership's   consolidated   financial   statements.   All   interentity
transactions between the Partnership and Colony Associates have been eliminated.

Note B - Related Party Transactions

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership.  The following expenses were paid or accrued to an affiliate of the
General Partner during the nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 2000:

                                                                  2001      2000
                                                                  (in thousands)

 Property management fees (included in operating expenses)        $ 70      $ 69
 Reimbursement for services of affiliates (included in
   investment property and general and administrative
   expenses)                                                       173        85
 Partnership management fees (included in general and
   administrative expenses)                                         46        --

During the nine months  ended  September  30, 2001 and 2000,  affiliates  of the
General  Partner  were  entitled  to  receive  5% of  gross  receipts  from  the
Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing  property  management
services.  The  Partnership  paid to such affiliates  approximately  $70,000 and
$69,000  for  the  nine  month  periods  ended  September  30,  2001  and  2000,
respectively.

An  affiliate  of the General  Partner  received  reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately $173,000 and $85,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. For the nine months
ended  September  30,  2001,   approximately  $95,000  of  construction  service
reimbursements are included in reimbursements for services of affiliates.

The Partnership Agreement also provides for a special management fee equal to 9%
of the total  distributions  made from operations to the Limited  Partners to be
paid  to  the  General  Partner  for  executive  and  administrative  management
services. The General Partner received  approximately $46,000,  resulting from a
distribution  declared and paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2001.
The General Partner received  approximately  $102,000 in January 2000, resulting
from the  distribution  declared and accrued in December  1999.  No such fee was
earned in 2000.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 88,697 limited partnership units in
the Partnership  representing  48.92% of the outstanding  units at September 30,
2001. A number of these units were  acquired  pursuant to tender  offers made by
AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will make
one  or  more  additional  offers  to  acquire  additional  limited  partnership
interests in the  Partnership for cash or in exchange for units in the operating
partnership of AIMCO either through  private  purchases or tender offers.  Under
the  Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders  holding a  majority  of the Units are
entitled  to take  action  with  respect to a variety of  matters,  which  would
include voting on certain amendments to the Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove  the  General  Partner.  As a result  of its  ownership  of 48.92% of the
outstanding  units,  AIMCO is in a position to significantly  influence all such
voting decisions with respect to the Registrant.  When voting on matters,  AIMCO
would in all likelihood vote the Units it acquired in a manner  favorable to the
interest  of the General  Partner  because of its  affiliation  with the General
Partner.

Note C - Change in Status of Non-Corporate General Partner

During the year ended December 31, 1991, the  Partnership  Agreement was amended
to convert the  General  Partner  interests  held by the  non-corporate  General
Partner,  Consolidated  Capital  Group II  ("CCG"),  to that of special  limited
partners ("Special Limited Partners").  The Special Limited Partners do not have
a vote and do not have any of the other rights of a Limited  Partner  except the
right to inspect  the  Partnership's  books and  records;  however,  the Special
Limited Partners  retained the economic  interest in the Partnership  which they
previously owned as general partner.

ConCap Equities, Inc. ("CEI") became the sole general partner of the Partnership
effective  December 31, 1991. In  connection  with CCG's  conversion,  a special
allocation of gross income was made to the Special Limited  Partners in order to
eliminate its tax basis negative capital account.

After the conversion,  the various Special Limited Partners transferred portions
of their  interests to CEI so that CEI now holds a .2% interest in all allocable
items of income,  loss and  distribution.  The  differences  between the Special
Limited  Partners'  capital  accounts for financial  statement and tax reporting
purposes are being amortized to the Limited  Partners'  capital  accounts as the
components of the timing differences which created the balance reverse.

Note D - Distributions

During the nine months ended September 30, 2001, a distribution of approximately
$534,000 to the  partners  (approximately  $513,000  to the limited  partners or
$2.83 per limited  partnership  unit)  consisting of funds from  operations  was
declared and paid. A distribution  of  approximately  $2,297,000  (approximately
$2,250,000 to the limited partners or $12.41 per limited  partnership  unit) was
accrued  during  December  1999  and paid in  January  2000.  This  distribution
consisted of cash from  operations of  approximately  $1,175,000  (approximately
$1,128,000 to the limited  partners or $6.22 per limited  partnership  unit) and
refinancing proceeds of approximately  $1,122,000 to the limited partners ($6.19
per limited  partnership  unit). No distributions  were declared during the nine
months ended September 30, 2000.

Note E - Segment Reporting

Statement of Financial  Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 131, "Disclosure about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" established standards for the
way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments
in annual  financial  statements  and  requires  that those  enterprises  report
selected  information about operating segments in interim financial reports.  It
also established  standards for related disclosures about products and services,
geographic  areas,  and  major  customers.  As  defined  in SFAS  No.  131,  the
Partnership has only one reportable  segment.  The General Partner believes that
segment-based disclosures will not result in a more meaningful presentation than
the consolidated financial statements as currently presented.

Note F - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain general partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which,  together  with a  demurrer  filed  by other  defendants,  is
currently  scheduled  to be heard on November  15,  2001.  The Court has set the
matter for trial in January 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike  the  complaint.  The  matters  are  currently  scheduled  to be heard on
November 15, 2001.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any  costs,  whether  legal or
settlement  costs,   associated  with  these  cases  will  be  material  to  the
Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.


ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The  matters  discussed  in this Form  10-QSB  contain  certain  forward-looking
statements  and  involve  risks and  uncertainties  (including  changing  market
conditions,   competitive  and  regulatory   matters,   etc.)  detailed  in  the
disclosures  contained  in this  Form  10-QSB  and the  other  filings  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission made by the  Partnership  from time to time.
The  discussion  of  the  Partnership's  business  and  results  of  operations,
including  forward-looking  statements pertaining to such matters, does not take
into  account  the  effects of any  changes to the  Partnership's  business  and
results of operation.  Accordingly,  actual results could differ materially from
those  projected in the  forward-looking  statements  as a result of a number of
factors, including those identified herein.

The Partnership's  investment property consists of one apartment complex, Colony
of Springdale Apartments, located in Springdale, Ohio. The average occupancy for
the nine month  periods  ended  September  30,  2001 and 2000,  was 90% and 92%,
respectively.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership  realized  a net loss of  approximately  $94,000  and  $242,000
compared to a net loss of  approximately  $45,000 and $139,000 for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The increase in net
loss for the nine months ended  September 30, 2001 is due to a decrease in total
revenues  partially offset by a decrease in total expenses.  The increase in net
loss for the three months ended September 30, 2001 is due to a decrease in total
revenues.  The  decrease in total  revenues  for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2001 resulted from a decrease in rental income partially offset by
an increase in other income. Rental income decreased primarily due to a decrease
in  occupancy  as well as an  increase  in  concessions  and bad  debt  expenses
partially offset by an increase in average rental rates.  Other income increased
as a result of  increased  late  charge fees  partially  offset by a decrease in
lease  cancellation  fees and a decrease in interest income due to lower average
cash balances in interest bearing accounts.

Total  expenses  decreased  for the nine months ended  September 30, 2001 due to
decreases in interest and property tax expenses, partially offset by an increase
in general and  administrative  and  operating  expenses.  While total  expenses
remained  relatively constant for the three months ended September 30, 2001, the
increase  in  operating  expense  was  offset  by  a  decrease  in  general  and
administrative  expense.  Interest expense decreased due to additional  interest
being paid during the nine  months  ended  September  30,  2000,  related to the
refinancing  of the  Partnership's  mortgage which occurred in October 1999. The
decrease  in  property  tax  expense is due to timing of the  receipt of the tax
bills, which affected the recording of the associated accrual. Operating expense
increased  due to an increase in the cost of preparing  vacant units for release
and due to an increase in  advertising  directed at obtaining  new tenants.  The
increase in general and administrative expenses is due to the special management
fee of 9% on  distributions  from operations  earned during the first quarter of
2001.  No such fee was earned  during the nine months ended  September 30, 2000.
Also included in general and administrative expenses are cost of services in the
management   reimbursements   to  the  General  Partner  as  allowed  under  the
Partnership  Agreement  and  costs  associated  with the  quarterly  and  annual
communications  with  investors  and  regulatory  agencies  and the annual audit
required by the Partnership Agreement.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner
monitors the rental market environment of its investment  property to assess the
feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and
protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the
General  Partner  attempts  to  protect  the  Partnership  from  the  burden  of
inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a
high overall occupancy level. However, due to changing market conditions,  which
can  result in the use of rental  concessions  and rental  reductions  to offset
softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the General Partner will
be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  September  30,  2001,  the  Partnership  had cash and  cash  equivalents  of
approximately  $162,000 as compared to  approximately  $656,000 at September 30,
2000. For the nine months ended  September 30, 2001,  cash and cash  equivalents
decreased by approximately  $648,000 from the Partnership's  year ended December
31, 2000.  The  decrease in cash and cash  equivalents  is due to  approximately
$640,000 of cash used in financing activities and approximately $266,000 of cash
used in investing  activities slightly offset by approximately  $258,000 of cash
provided by operating activities. Cash used in financing activities consisted of
distributions  to the  partners  and  principal  payments  made on the  mortgage
encumbering  the  Partnership's  property.  Cash  used in  investing  activities
consisted of property improvements and replacements. The Partnership invests its
working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the property to adequately maintain the physical asset
and other operating  needs of the Registrant and to comply with Federal,  state,
and local legal and regulatory  requirements.  Capital  improvements planned for
the Partnership's property are discussed below.

Colony of Springdale Apartments

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2001,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $266,000 of budgeted and  non-budgeted  capital  improvements  at
Colony of Springdale  Apartments,  consisting  of appliance  and floor  covering
replacements,  roof replacements,  HVAC upgrades and swimming pool improvements.
The  improvements  were funded through  operating cash flow. The Partnership has
budgeted,  but is not limited to, capital improvements of approximately $176,000
for the year 2001 at this  property  which  consist of floor  covering  and roof
replacements,  countertops and structural upgrades.  Additional improvements may
be considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well
as replacement reserves and anticipated cash flow generated by the property. The
capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations.
To the  extent  that such  budgeted  capital  improvements  are  completed,  the
Registrant's distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least
in the short term.

The Partnership's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs  (exclusive  of capital  improvements)  of the  Partnership.  The mortgage
indebtedness  of  approximately  $5,370,000  is  amortized  over 240  months and
matures December 1, 2019 at which time the mortgage will be fully amortized.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2001, a distribution of approximately
$534,000 to the  partners  (approximately  $513,000  to the limited  partners or
$2.83 per limited  partnership  unit)  consisting of funds from  operations  was
declared and paid. A distribution  of  approximately  $2,297,000  (approximately
$2,250,000 to the limited partners or $12.41 per limited  partnership  unit) was
accrued  during  December  1999  and paid in  January  2000.  This  distribution
consisted of cash from  operations of  approximately  $1,175,000  (approximately
$1,128,000 to the limited  partners or $6.22 per limited  partnership  unit) and
refinancing proceeds of approximately  $1,122,000 to the limited partners ($6.19
per limited  partnership  unit). No distributions  were declared during the nine
months ended September 30, 2000.  Future cash  distributions  will depend on the
levels of net cash generated from operations,  the availability of cash reserves
and the timing of the debt  maturity,  refinancing  and/or  property  sale.  The
Registrant's distribution policy is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no
assurance that the Partnership  will generate  sufficient funds from operations,
after required capital expenditures,  to permit additional  distributions to its
partners during the remainder of 2001 or subsequent periods.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 88,697 limited partnership units in
the Partnership  representing  48.92% of the outstanding  units at September 30,
2001. A number of these units were  acquired  pursuant to tender  offers made by
AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will make
one  or  more  additional  offers  to  acquire  additional  limited  partnership
interests in the  Partnership for cash or in exchange for units in the operating
partnership of AIMCO either through  private  purchases or tender offers.  Under
the  Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders  holding a  majority  of the Units are
entitled  to take  action  with  respect to a variety of  matters,  which  would
include voting on certain amendments to the Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove  the  General  Partner.  As a result  of its  ownership  of 48.92% of the
outstanding  units,  AIMCO is in a position to significantly  influence all such
voting decisions with respect to the Registrant.  When voting on matters,  AIMCO
would in all likelihood vote the Units it acquired in a manner  favorable to the
interest  of the General  Partner  because of its  affiliation  with the General
Partner.


<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain general partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which,  together  with a  demurrer  filed  by other  defendants,  is
currently  scheduled  to be heard on November  15,  2001.  The Court has set the
matter for trial in January 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike  the  complaint.  The  matters  are  currently  scheduled  to be heard on
November 15, 2001.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any  costs,  whether  legal or
settlement  costs,   associated  with  these  cases  will  be  material  to  the
Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a)    Exhibits:

                  None.

            b)    Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended September 30, 2001.




<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI


                                    By:   CONCAP EQUITIES, INC.
                                          General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Controller


                                    Date: