alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from McCombs
Realty Partners Ltd. 1996 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000759198
<NAME> MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             433
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           5,748
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,989)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          5,794
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,372)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,636
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,093
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,154
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 407
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (61)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.74)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 27 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 27

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
           deduction of State and local general sales taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

 Mrs. Hutchison (for herself, Mr. Frist, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Ensign, Mr. 
  Alexander, and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
           deduction of State and local general sales taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION OF STATE AND LOCAL GENERAL 
              SALES TAXES.

     Subparagraph (I) of section 164(b)(5) is amended by striking ``, 
and before January 1, 2006''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE OF MAINE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI DAVID P. LITTELL 

GOVERNOR 

June l, 2010 

David Conroy, Chief 

Air Programs Branch 

U.S . EPA Region I-NE 

5 Post Office Square 

Mail Code: OEP 05-2 

Boston, Ma. 02109-3912 

:1) q, ~rcv~ 

Dear Mr.~nroy: 

Enclosed please find for your approval and inclusion into Maine's State Implementation 

Plan (SIP), Chapter 123, Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Paper, Film and 

Foil Coating Operations . 

A public hearing was held on January 7, 2010 in accordance with federal and state 

administrative requirements . Public notice of the hearing was published in the Kennebec 

Journal on December 9, 2009 and in newspapers statewide on December 16, 2009. On 

April 15, 2010, the Board of Environmental Protection adopted Chapter 123 . 

The following administrative materials are enclosed: 

1 . Memorandum to the Board of Environmental Protection requesting a public hearing 

dated December 3, 2009 ; 

2. Copy of the public notice that appeared in the Kennebec Journal on December 9, 

2009; 

3 . Memorandum to the Board of Environmental Protection requesting adoption of the 

rule, dated April 15, 2010; 

4. Chapter 123 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Paper, Film and Foil 

Coating Operations as adopted by the Board of Environmental Protection on April 15, 

2010 with an effective date of May 18, 2010; 

COMMISSIONER 

AUGUSTA 

17 STATE HOUSE STATION BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE 

AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 106 HOGAN ROAD, SUITE 6 312 CANCO ROAD 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK 

(207) 287-7688 FAX: (207) 287-7826 BANGOR, MAINE 04401 PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04679-2094 

RAY BLDG., HOSPITAL ST. (207) 941-4570 FAX: (207) 941-4584 (207) 822-6300 FAX: (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-0477 FAX: (207) 760-3143 

web site : www.maine .gov/dep 
5. Summary of comments and the Department's response; 

6. MAPA I form for Chapter 123 which provides certification by the Commissioner that 

the hearing was held on January 7, 2010, the Board of Environmental Protection 

lawfully adopted this rule on April 15, 2010 and certification that the Attorney 

General approved the rule as to form and legality ; and 

7. The January 7, 2010 public hearing transcript . 

Should you have any questions, please contact Carolyn Wheeler at (207) 287-2437 . 

Sincerely, 

1141A:e1r4 

James P. Brooks 

Director 

Bureau of Air Quality 

Enclosures 

cc: Anne Arnold 

Ariel Garcia 

Carolyn Wheeler w/o encl 

SIP file
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
             RASC SERIES 2006-EMX8 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of September 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),
among  Residential  Asset  Securities  Corporation,  as  depositor,  Residential
Funding  Company,  LLC (formerly  Residential  Funding  Corporation),  as master
servicer,  and U.S. Bank National  Association,  as trustee, does hereby certify
that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
49.105-3 Termination case file.

The TCO responsible for negotiating the final settlement shall establish a separate case file for each

termination. This file will include memoranda and records of all actions relative to the settlement

(see 4.801).

Parent topic: 49.105 Duties of termination contracting officer after issuance of notice of

termination.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,198,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,899,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   421,000
<INVENTORY>                                 23,256,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,141,000
<PP&E>                                      19,368,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,499,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,778,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,551,000
<BONDS>                                      6,573,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,932,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,273,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,778,000
<SALES>                                     28,801,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,801,000
<CGS>                                       17,746,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,592,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             444,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,681,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,054,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,627,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,627,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.37
        

</TABLE>
(December 16, 1966)

#### In the Matter of the Claim of Josephine Rubino, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal as academic granted, respondent board having vacated the decision appealed during the pendency of the appeal. The subsequent decision may not be reviewed upon this appeal. (Cf. *Matter of Williams*v. *Bowers,*24 A D 2d 1035; *Matter of Veach*v. *County of Erie,*24 A D 2d 916; where, upon rehearing, the board adhered to its original decision.) Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

PHILLIP M. WISE, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 4:21-cv-20-GRJ 

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT 

OF HEALTH, 

 Defendant.

_______________________________/ 

JUDGMENT 

This case was decided on a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s claims 

are dismissed on the merits with prejudice. Plaintiff will take nothing. 

April 19, 2022 

 JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS 

CLERK OF COURT 

áB UÄt|Ü ^A ctààÉÇ Date Deputy Clerk: Blair Patton 

Case 4:21-cv-00020-AW-MAF Document 33 Filed 04/19/22 Page 1 of 1
#### KENNEDY, Respondent, v. HALL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department

July 12, 1906.)

Action by James J. Kennedy against John Holl. B. L. Kraus, for appellant. M. Stein, for respondent

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed. See 99 N. Y. Supp. 162.
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 124 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
§ 756.6 Eligible and ineligible causes of revenue loss. ( a ) To be eligible for payments under this part the producer must have suffered a loss of revenue due to the Oriental fruit fly quarantine of one or more of the following types: ( 1 ) Revenue loss on crop(s) planted or prevented from being planted within the Oriental Fruit Fly quarantine area during the OFF quarantine period. Crops that suffered a revenue loss due to prevented planting must have a prior history of being planted or be able to provide verifiable or reliable documentation demonstrating legitimate intent to plant the crop during the OFF quarantine period;
( 2 ) Pre or post-harvest treatment costs;
( 3 ) Transportation costs to a post-harvest treatment facility;
( 4 ) Crop quality loss;
( 5 ) Crop spoilage;
( 6 ) Crop drop; or
( 7 ) Reduced post-harvest shelf life.
( b ) An ineligible cause of revenue loss under this part will apply to the following: ( 1 ) Losses determined by FSA to be the result of poor management decisions or poor farming practices, such as using non-optimal chemical application, over-tilling, monoculture (growing of same crop year after year), allowing soil erosion, nonoptimal planting time, or poor quality seed selection.
( 2 ) Losses due to conditions or events occurring outside of the applicable growing season for the crop.
( 3 ) Losses due to failure of a power supply or lack of irrigation.
( 4 ) Losses to crops not intended for harvest.
( 5 ) Losses to home gardens for personal use and not intended to market.
( 6 ) Losses to non-fruit bearing ornamental nursery.
( 7 ) Losses caused by theft.
( 8 ) Losses caused by disease or pest infestation other than the Oriental fruit fly.
( 9 ) Losses to purchased crops.
# L_2014327EN.01000401.xml

| 12.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 327/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 327/4

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 7 November 2014

appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2014/779/EU)

(2014/779/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1).

1

| (2) | A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr André MORDANT, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr André MORDANT,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Anne DEMELENNE, Secrétaire générale de la Fédération Générale du Travail de Belgique (FGTB) et Présidente de l'Interrégionale wallonne de la FGTB, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.

Secrétaire générale de la Fédération Générale du Travail de Belgique (FGTB) et Présidente de l'Interrégionale wallonne de la FGTB

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 7 November 2014.

For the Council

The President

P. C. PADOAN

---

(1)  OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.

1

---
§ 632.21 Reclamation plan. ( a ) *Responsibility.* Land users are responsible for developing a reclamation plan that will serve as a basis for a contract. Normally, a land user will need the technical services of NRCS and the conservation district or another professional to develop an acceptable plan.
( b ) *Objectives and priorities.* The reclamation plan is to provide for the appropriate program objectives and priorities as stated in §§ 632.2 and 632.12 and meet the definition of a reclamation plan as defined in § 632.4.
( c ) *Review.* ( 1 ) In areas served by conservation districts, reclamation plans are to be reviewed and signed by the district board to insure that planned land use and treatment is compatible with surrounding land uses and that proposed assistance is consistent with the district plan of work and priorities. In areas not served by conservation districts, the land use compatibility review may be performed by the local reclamation committee.
( 2 ) If reclamation plans include lands within or adjacent to Federal lands, the plan is to be reviewed with the appropriate Federal land management agency to insure that the planned land use is compatible with that of the surrounding area.
( 3 ) Land users are responsible for insuring that the proposed land use and treatment is compatible with local land use ordinances.
( d ) *Approval.* Proposed land use, conservation treatment, and sequence of application contained in the plan are to be agreed to by both NRCS and the land user. The district conservationist is to sign the reclamation plan to indicate technical approval.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

                    Part C (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) of the Statement of Organization, Functions, and                           ( print page 7490)                        Delegations of Authority of the Department of Health and Human Services (45 FR 67772-76, dated October 14, 1980, and corrected at 45 FR 69296, October 20, 1980, as amended most recently at 74 FR 68630-3 1, dated December 28, 2009) is amended to reflect the establishment of the Office of Noncommunicable Diseases, Injury and Environmental Health.                

*Section C-B, Organization and Functions, is hereby amended as follows:*

After the mission statement for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (C), delete the title and insert the following:

Office of Noncommunicable Diseases, Injury and Environmental Health (CU). The mission of the Office of Noncommunicable Diseases, Injury and Environmental Health (ONDIEH) is to reduce the burden of noncommunicable diseases, injuries, disabilities and environmental health hazards.

Office of the Director (CUA). (1) Advises the CDC Director on issues related to noncommunicable diseases, injury prevention, disability, and environmental health; (2) provides overall strategic direction and leadership for noncommunicable diseases, injury prevention, disability and environmental health; (3) promotes and supports noncommunicable diseases, injury prevention, disability, and environmental health related science, policies and programs; and (4) identifies, facilitates, and promotes cross center and cross-agency collaboration, innovation, and new initiatives related to noncommunicable diseases, injury prevention, disability, and environmental health.

Dated: February 3, 2010.

William P. Nichols,

Acting Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2010-3069 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-18-M
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LAVAROS DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5935-HTC

SGT. DANIELS, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER

Before the Court is the parties’ joint stipulation of dismissal. ECF Doc. 153. 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action is dismissed with prejudice. 

The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of July, 2023.

/s/ Hope Thai Cannon

HOPE THAI CANNON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05935-HTC Document 154 Filed 07/17/23 Page 1 of 1
#### § 631.14 Contract violations.

Contract violations, determinations and appeals will be handled in accordance with the terms of the contract and attachments thereto. Violations involving fraud are to be handled in accordance with current USDA regulations.
# L_2014100EN.01001301.xml

| 3.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 100/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 100/13

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of 4 October 2013 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 290 of 31 October 2013
  )

On page 321, in the line following that for CN code 4421 90 91:

in column 3:

delete:
  ‘4’;

delete:

in column 4:

delete:
  ‘—’.

delete:

---
52.222-57 [Reserved].

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 133433(55)(56)(57) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, AMANDA JEAN ODOM, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133433 COA: 270501 Wayne CC: 05-503671-NI WAYNE COUNTY and CITY OF DETROIT, Defendants,

and

CHRISTINE KELLY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motions for leave to f ile briefs amicus curiae are GRANTED. The motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s January 11, 20 08 order is considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE our order dated Janu ary 11, 2008. On reconsideration, the application for leave to app eal the February 1, 2 007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The partie s shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) what is the proper interpretation of MCL 691.1407(3) (“[MCL 691.1407(2)] does not alter the law of intentional torts as it existed b efore July 7, 1986.”); (2) can intentional torts claims be brought under MCL 691.1407(2); and (3) for an intentional tort claim, wh at must a plaintiff plead to avoid governmental immunity?

The Michigan Municipal League, the Michigan Muni cipal League Liability & Property Pool, the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office, and the Michig an Association of Police Organizations are invited to file additi onal briefs amicus cu riae. The Attorney General is invited to file a brief amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues p resented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

d0422 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 25, 2008

Clerk