alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report of WES Consulting, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Louis S. Friedman, Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.





Date:
      October 13, 2010
                  /s/
      Louis S. FriedmanLouis
      S. FriedmanChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
                    of
      WES Consulting,
Inc.
#### § 56.32 Information to be furnished to graders.

The applicant for grading service shall furnish to the grader rendering such service such information as may be required for the purposes of this part.

[71 FR 42010, July 24, 2006]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2876 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl 2-[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2- 

ylcarbamoyl)sulfamoyl]-α-(methanesulfonamido)-p-toluate (Mesosulfuronmethyl) (CAS No. 208465–21–8) whether or not mixed with application 

adjuvants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl 2-[(4,6- 

dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoyl)sulfamoyl]-α- 

(methanesulfonamido)-p-toluate (Mesosulfuron-methyl) 

(CAS No. 208465–21–8) whether or not mixed with 

application adjuvants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2876 IS 

1 SECTION 1. METHYL 2-[(4,6-DIMETHOXYPYRIMIDIN-2- 

2 YLCARBAMOYL)SULFAMOYL]-α3 (METHANESULFONAMIDO)-P-TOLUATE 

4 (MESOSULFURON-METHYL) WHETHER OR 

5 NOT MIXED WITH APPLICATION ADJUVANTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.11.48 Methyl 2-[(4,6- 

dimethoxypyrimidin-2- 

ylcarbamoyl)sulfamoyl]-α- 

(methanesulfonamido)-ptoluate (Mesosulfuron-methyl) (CAS No. 208465–21–8) 

whether or not mixed with 

application adjuvants (provided for in subheading 

2935.00.75 or 3808.30.15) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

12 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Exhibit
13.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of Rodman International Enterprise I, Ltd.
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Arnold P. Kling,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                               | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Dated: June
 26, 2009          | 
|                               | 
|/s/ Arnold
 P. Kling           | 
|                               | 
|Arnold P.
 Kling               | 
|President                      | 
|(Principal
 Executive Officer) | 

A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE04360A146
Exhibit 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                         /s/ R. Alan Miller
                                         -------------------------
                                         R. Alan Miller
                                         Chief Financial Officer


Date:  May 9, 2005
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ROBERT BOOKER,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 5:03-CV-308-SPM

WARDEN MONICA WETZEL and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND DISMISSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the magistrate judge's report

and recommendation (doc. 6) dated September 22, 2005. The parties have been

furnished a copy and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. 

Plaintiff filed his objections on October 21, 2005 (doc. 8).

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made

a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. 

Plaintiff fails to understand that the court did, in fact, set a schedule for payment. 

The administrative supervision of those payments, on the other hand, may

properly be delegated to the discretion of the Bureau of Prisons. The court

Case 5:03-cv-00308-SPM-AK Document 9 Filed 11/08/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

fulfilled its judicial function by determining the amount and time of payment. The

Bureau’s Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (“IFRP”) is designed to assist

the inmate in meeting the court-imposed financial obligations in a timely manner. 

The IFRP is not, by any stretch, cruel or unusual punishment, and Plaintiff’s

arguments to the contrary are unavailing. Accordingly, it is

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 6) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is hereby

denied.

3. This case is dismissed with prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this eighth day of November, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

/pao

Case 5:03-cv-00308-SPM-AK Document 9 Filed 11/08/05 Page 2 of 2
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2635 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the transportation 

fringe benefit to bicycle commuters. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24, 2006 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Ms. SNOWE, Ms. CANTWELL, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the transportation fringe benefit to bicycle commuters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bicycle Commuters 

5 Benefits Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TRANSPORTATION FRINGE BENEFIT 

7 TO BICYCLE COMMUTERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 132(f) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 2635 IS

1 rule for qualified transportation fringe) is amended by 

2 adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(D) Bicycle commuting allowance.’’. 

4 (b) BICYCLE COMMUTING ALLOWANCE DEFINED.— 

5 Paragraph (5) of section 132(f) of such Code (relating to 

6 definitions) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(F) BICYCLE COMMUTING ALLOWANCE.— 

8 The term ‘bicycle commuting allowance’ means 

9 an amount provided to an employee for trans10 portation on a bicycle if such transportation is 

11 in connection with travel between the employ12 ee’s residence and place of employment.’’. 

13 (c) LIMITATION ON EXCLUSION.—Paragraph (2) of 

14 section 132(f) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘sub15 paragraphs (A) and (B)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraphs 

16 (A), (B), and (D)’’. 

17 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

19 December 31, 2005. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
§ 51.762 Size. ( a ) Fruits shall be fairly uniform in size and shall be packed in containers according to approved and recognized methods.
( b ) “Fairly uniform in size” means that not more than 10 percent of the grapefruit per sample may vary more than one-half inch in diameter.
( c ) In order to allow for variations incident to proper sizing, not more than 10 percent of the samples in any lot may fail to meet the requirements of size.
#### § 657.1 Purpose.

NRCS is concerned about any action that tends to impair the productive capacity of American agriculture. The Nation needs to know the extent and location of the best land for producing food, feed, fiber forage, and oilseed crops. In addition to prime and unique farmlands, farmlands that are of statewide and local importance for producing these crops also need to be identified.
EXHIBIT
32.2











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Atlas Resources Public 16-2007 (A) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the MGP, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            March
      30, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Krupp
Institutional Mortgage Fund L.P. Financial Statements for the nine months
ended September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,236,306
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,505,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                16,524,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,506<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,270,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,900
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,251,977<F2>
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,270,877
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               421,934
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   340,496
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Other assets.
<F2>Includes Limited Partner equity of $8,421,132 and general Partner deficit of
($169,155).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

HUGUETTE NICOLE YOUNG,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:21cv66-TKW-HTC

GROVER ROBINSON,

Defendant.

______________________/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 8). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed for failure to 

prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the file.

Case 3:21-cv-00066-TKW-HTC Document 9 Filed 03/29/21 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of March, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:21-cv-00066-TKW-HTC Document 9 Filed 03/29/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Geopulse Exploration, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Zhipeng Cai,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Zhipeng CaiZhipeng Cai, Chief Financial Officer April 29,  2009
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES JOSEPH KNOCHEL,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

and

EMILY NOELLE MIHAYLO,

Petitioner,

v.

AMY FACKRELL; JOHN C. MORRIS;

UNKOWN PARTY, named as Medical

Director

- West Yavapai Guidance Clinic;

ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE

OF ARIZONA,

Respondents

- Appellees. No. 20

- 17326

D.C. No. 3:19

- cv

- 08086

- GMS

- JZB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021 * *

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 17326

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

James Joseph Knochel appeals pro se from the dis trict court’s order

designating him a vexatious litigant and imposing pre

- filing restrictions against

him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm

.

Knochel contends that the district court should have held an evidentiary

hearing before imposing the order, and that recent development s in state court

undermine the basis for the order. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see M olski v.

Everg r een Dynasty Corp. , 5 00 F.3d 1047, 1056 (9th Cir. 2007), we conclude there

was none. The district court followed the appropriate procedure in imposing the

order: It gave Knochel notice and an opportunity to oppose the order, compiled an

adequate record for appellate review, made substantive findings regarding the

harassing nature of Knochel’s litigation history, and narrowly tailored the

prohibition to future filings in which Knochel may seek t o act on behalf of, as next

friend of, or that in any way relate to, Emily Mihaylo. See Ringgold

- Lockhart v.

C n ty. of Los Angeles , 761 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2014). T he alleged

development s in state court do not undermine the basis for the order , and the

authorities Knochel cites do not support his claim that the district court erred by

failing to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding those developments.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of The Saint James Company on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Wayne Gronquist, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




May 14,
2009






/s/ Wayne
Gronquist





President
and Chief Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MARCUS D FLEMING,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5990-LC-HTC

WARDEN M. V. JOSEPH,

Respondent.

/

ORD ER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report

and Recommendation dated April 7, 2021 (ECF No. 18). The parties have been

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1).

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de

novo review of the objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. 18)

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2

2. The petition, ECF Doc. 1 is DISMISSED. 

3. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of April, 2021.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv5990-LC-HTC
#### § 51.2120 Decay.

*Decay* means that part or all of the kernel has become decomposed.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:01cr47-SPM

CHRISTOPHER ALAN BROWN,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO MODIFY UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion (doc. 195) to

modify sentence under the retroactive crack cocaine amendment (Amendments

706 and 711) and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Government filed a response in

opposition (doc. 196).

Upon review, the Court finds that Defendant is not entitled to a sentence

reduction because application of the guideline amendment results in no change

to his sentencing range. Defendant was subject to a statutory mandatory

minimum sentence, which determined his sentencing range. Because

Defendant’s sentencing range remains the same under the amended guidelines,

he is not eligible for a reduction. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion (doc. 195) to modify

Case 4:01-cr-00047-MW-AK Document 198 Filed 03/26/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

CASE NO.: 4:01cr47-SPM

sentence is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of March, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:01-cr-00047-MW-AK Document 198 Filed 03/26/08 Page 2 of 2