alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 764.103 General security requirements. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 65039 , Aug. 8, 2024.
( a ) Security requirements specific to each loan program are outlined in subparts D through I of this part.
( b ) All loans must be secured by assets having a security value of at least 100 percent of the loan amount, except for EM loans as provided in subpart I of this part. If the applicant's assets do not provide adequate security, the Agency may accept: ( 1 ) A pledge of security from a third party; or
( 2 ) Interests in property not owned by the applicant (such as leases that provide a mortgageable value, water rights, easements, mineral rights, and royalties).
( c ) An additional amount of security up to 150 percent of the loan amount will be taken when available, except for downpayment loans, MLs made for purposes other than annual operating, and youth loans.
( d ) The Agency will choose the best security available when there are several alternatives that meet the Agency's security requirements.
( e ) The Agency will take a lien on all assets that are not essential to the farming operation and are not being converted to cash to reduce the loan amount when each such asset, or aggregate value of like assets (such as stocks), has a value in excess of $15,000. The value of this security is not included in the Agency's additional security requirement stated in paragraph (c) of this section. This requirement does not apply to downpayment loans, CL, ML, or youth loans.
[72 FR 63298, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 74345, Dec. 8, 2008; 75 FR 54015, Sept. 3, 2010; 78 FR 3835, Jan. 17, 2013; 86 FR 43391, Aug. 9, 2021]
§ 760.807 Miscellaneous provisions. ( a ) A person is not eligible to receive disaster assistance under this part if it is determined by FSA that the person has: ( 1 ) Adopted any scheme or other device that tends to defeat the purpose of this part;
( 2 ) Made any fraudulent representation;
( 3 ) Misrepresented any fact affecting a program determination;
( 4 ) Is ineligible under § 1400.5 of this title; or
( 5 ) Does not have entitlement to an ownership share of the crop. ( i ) Growers growing eligible crops under contract for crop owners are not eligible unless the grower can be determined to have a share of the crop.
( ii ) Any verbal or written contract that precludes the grower from having an ownership share renders the grower ineligible for benefits under this part.
( b ) A person ineligible under § 1437.15(c) of this title for any year is likewise ineligible for benefits under this part for that year or years.
( c ) A person ineligible under § 400.458 of this title for any year is likewise ineligible for benefits under this part for that year or years.
( d ) All persons with a financial interest in the operation receiving benefits under this part are jointly and severally liable for any refund, including related charges, which is determined to be due FSA for any reason.
( e ) In the event that any request for assistance or payment under this part resulted from erroneous information or a miscalculation, the assistance or payment will be recalculated and any excess refunded to FSA with interest to be calculated from the date of the disbursement to the producer.
( f ) The liability of anyone for any penalty or sanction under or in connection with this part, or for any refund to FSA or related charge is in addition to any other liability of such person under any civil or criminal fraud statute or any other provision of law including, but not limited to: 18 U.S.C. 286, 287, 371, 641, 651, 1001, and 1014; 15 U.S.C. 714; and 31 U.S.C. 3729.
( g ) The regulations in parts 11 and 780 of this title apply to determinations under this part.
( h ) Any payment to any person will be made without regard to questions of title under State law and without regard to any claim or lien against the crop, or its proceeds.
( i ) For the purposes of the effect of lien on eligibility for Federal programs (28 U.S.C. 3201(e)), FSA waives the restriction on receipt of funds or benefits under this program but only as to beneficiaries who, as a condition of such waiver, agree to apply the benefits received under this part to reduce the amount of the judgment lien.
( j ) Under this program, participants are either eligible or ineligible. Participants in general, do not render performance or need to comply. They either suffered eligible losses or they did not. Accordingly, the provisions of § 718.304 of this chapter do not apply to this part.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CORNELIUS CANADY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:21-cv-7-AW-MJF

CENTURION OF FLORIDA, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s April 29, 2021 report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 60, to which no objections have been filed. Having 

considered the matter, I now adopt the report and recommendation and incorporate 

it into this order.

The clerk will enter a judgment that says “The claim against Dr. Colombani 

is dismissed without prejudice for impermissible claim splitting. The claims against 

Centurion, Roberts, and Moralas are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon 

which relief can be granted.” The clerk will then close the file. 

SO ORDERED on June 19, 2021.

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge
§ 50.11 Conditional withdrawal of service. ( a ) The Director may withdraw grading or inspection service from a person for correctable cause. The grading or inspection service withdrawn, after appropriate corrective action is taken, will be restored immediately, or as soon thereafter as a grader or inspector can be made available.
( b ) Written notice of withdrawal of grading or inspection service under this section shall be given to the person from whom grading or inspection services will be withdrawn in advance of withdrawal, whenever it is feasible to provide such an advance written notice. If advance written notice is not given, the withdrawal action and the reasons for the withdrawal shall be confirmed as promptly as circumstances permit, unless the deficiency which is the basis for the withdrawal has already been corrected.
#### § 54.1029 Payment of fees and other charges.

Fees and other charges for service shall be paid upon receipt of billing for fees and other charges for service. The applicant shall remit by check, draft, or money order, made payable to the Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA, payment for the service in accordance with directions on the billing, and such fees and charges shall be paid in advance if required by the official design review specialist or other authorized official.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Centenary International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carlos Fabian De Sousa, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Carlos Fabian De
  SousaCarlos
      Fabian De SousaChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      12, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The
foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.
Case 3:06-cv-00627-WKW-SRW Document 11 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 631.21 Compliance with regulatory measures.

Participants who carry out conservation practices shall be responsible for obtaining the authorities, rights, easements, or other approvals necessary for the implementation and maintenance of the conservation practices in keeping with applicable laws and regulations. Participants shall save the United States harmless from any infringements upon the rights of others or from any failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations.
52.232-4 Payments under Transportation Contracts and Transportation-Related Services Contracts.       As prescribed in 32.111(a)(4), insert the following clause, appropriately modified with respect to payment due dates in accordance with agency regulations, in solicitations and contracts for transportation or transportation-related services:          Payments under Transportation Contracts and Transportation-Related Services Contracts (Apr 1984)          The Government shall pay the Contractor upon the submission of properly certified invoices or vouchers, the amount due for services rendered and accepted, less deductions, if any, as herein provided.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.232 [Reserved]
#### Acme American Repairs, Inc., Respondent, v Rhoda Uretsky et al., Appellants.

Submitted September 24, 2007;

decided November 20, 2007

Reported below, 39 AD3d 675.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000498

31-JAN-2018

09:15 AM
Exhibit 10.12





September 15, 2010





Burnham Hill Advisors LLC


590 Madison Avenue, 5th Floor


New York, NY 10022





Re:           Amendment No. 1 to the Consulting Agreement dated August 20, 2010





To Whom It May Concern:





Reference is made to the Consulting Agreement for Services Between Bond Laboratories, Inc. (“Bond Labs” or the “Company”) and Burnham Hill Advisors LLC (“BHA”) dated August 20, 2010 (the "Agreement"). This letter (this “Amendment”) supplements and amends certain of the terms contained in the Agreement as provided below.





The following paragraph shall be added to the end of Section 5 (“5. Payment”):





“In addition to the cash compensation provided for herein, the COMPANY also agrees to issue to BHA 250,000 shares of restricted common stock in connection with the execution of this Agreement.”





This Amendment amends and modifies the Agreement, which remains in full force and effect as to matters not discussed herein.  In the case of any inconsistency or conflict between the provisions of this Amendment and the provisions of the Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall govern.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first written above.





BOND LABORATORIES, INC.











By:           /s/ John Wilson


Name:            John Wilson


Title:            Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

NOEL K. BANGO,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:03cv576/MCR/EMT

JAMES CROSBY, et al.,

 Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated October 19, 2005. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report

and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of

any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief may be

granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of November, 2005.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-00576-MCR-EMT Document 82 Filed 11/22/05 Page 1 of 1
#### § 56.66 Appeal grading certificates.

Immediately after an appeal grading is completed, an appeal certificate shall be issued to show that the original grading was sustained or was not sustained. Such certificate shall supersede any previously issued certificate for the product involved and shall clearly identify the number and date of the superseded certificate. The issuance of the appeal certificate may be withheld until any previously issued certificate and all copies have been returned when such action is deemed necessary to protect the interest of the Government. When the appeal grader assigns a different grade to the lot, the existing grademark shall be changed or obliterated as necessary. When the appeal grader assigns a different class or quantity designation to the lot, the labeling shall be corrected.

[35 FR 9918, June 17, 1970. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 71 FR 42010, July 24, 2006]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-CR-169-WKW

)

JAMES EARL HUBBARD )

MOTION TO DECREASE DEFENDANT’S OFFENSE LEVEL

PURSUANT TO § 3E1.1(b), UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES

(ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY)

COMES NOW the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary,

United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and files the above-captioned

Motion, and as reasons therefore, submits the following:

1. Defendant qualifies for a reduction in Defendant’s sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G

§ 3E1.1(b) as Defendant assisted authorities in the investigation and prosecution of

Defendant’s own misconduct by timely notifying authorities of Defendant’s intention to

enter a plea of guilty, thereby permitting the United States to avoid preparing for trial and

permitting the Government and this Court to allocate their resources efficiently.

2. Accordingly, pursuant to U.S.S.G § 3E1.1(b), the United States respectfully

moves this Court to reduce the Defendant’s offense level by one level. Combined with the

two-level reduction applied to Defendant’s offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a),

a total reduction of three levels should be applied to Defendant’s offense level for

Defendant’s acceptance of responsibility.

Respectfully submitted this the 29 day of January, 2008. th

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/A. Clark Morris

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 533 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 1 of 3
A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

131 Clayton Street

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 533 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 2 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-CR-169-WKW

)

JAMES EARL HUBBARD )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 29, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such

filing to the following: William Blanchard.

Respectfully submitted,

s/A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney 

131 Clayton Street 

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 533 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 3 of 3
52.253-1 Computer Generated Forms.

As prescribed in FAR 53.111 , insert the following clause:

Computer Generated Forms (Jan 1991)

(a) Any data required to be submitted on a Standard or Optional Form prescribed by the Federal

Acquisition Regulation (FAR) may be submitted on a computer generated version of the form,

provided there is no change to the name, content, or sequence of the data elements on the form, and

provided the form carries the Standard or Optional Form number and edition date.

(b) Unless prohibited by agency regulations, any data required to be submitted on an agency unique

form prescribed by an agency supplement to the FAR may be submitted on a computer generated

version of the form provided there is no change to the name, content, or sequence of the data

elements on the form and provided the form carries the agency form number and edition date.

(c) If the Contractor submits a computer generated version of a form that is different than the

required form, then the rights and obligations of the parties will be determined based on the content

of the required form.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.253 [Reserved]
#### Ida Duke, Respondent, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Appellant.

(Argued April 22,1884 ;

decided May 6, 1884.)

*Samuel Sand*for appellant.

*Clifford A. S. Bartlett*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

v. * Case No.: 3:06-cv-618-MEF 

 * 

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., * 

 * 

 Defendants. * 

MOTION TO FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER

 Defendant, Southern Energy Homes, Inc. (“Southern Energy”), pursuant to Rule 15, 

F.R.C.P. and Local Rule 15.1, moves this Court to allow it to file the attached Amended Answer 

and, as grounds, therefore, states as follows: 

 1. On or about June 14, 2006, Harold Kelly Murphy (hereinafter referred to as 

“Plaintiff”) commenced the above-styled action against Southern Energy. 

 2. Southern Energy timely filed its answer. 

 3. Under the Court’s August 22, 2006 Scheduling Order, the parties have until 

November 6, 2006 to file any motions to amend the pleadings. 

 4. Attached as Exhibit A hereto is Southern Energy’s proposed amended answer. 

The amended answer merely asserts additional affirmative defenses. 

 5. Under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “leave shall be freely 

given when justice so requires.” 

 6. In the case at bar, Southern Energy should be allowed to amend its answer to 

assert the additional defenses. This case has only been pending since June 14, 2006 and the 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 11/03/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

parties are early in the discovery process. At this time, the parties have merely exchanged initial 

disclosures and other paper discovery, and no depositions have been taken. 

 WHEREFORE, Southern Energy Homes, Inc. respectfully requests that this Court grant 

the instant motion and allow it to amend its previously filed answer. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s Mitchel H. Boles 

 Robert D. Segall (ASB-7354-E68R) 

 Lee H. Copeland (ASB-3461-O72L) 

 Mitchel H. Boles (ASB-0813-S69M) 

 

 Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, P.A. 

444 South Perry Street 

P. O. Box 347 

Montgomery, AL 36101-0347

Phone: 334/834-1180 

Facsimile: 334/834-3172 

Email: segall@copelandfranco.com

Email: copeland@copelandfranco.com

Email: boles@copelandfranco.com

Attorney for Southern Energy Homes, Inc. 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 11/03/2006 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on the 3rd day of November, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing 

to the following: 

• Charles Lance Gould

lance.gould@beasleyallen.com holly.stroh@beasleyallen.com 

• Carter Gibson Vance

gibson.vance@beasleyallen.com heidi.bowers@beasleyallen.com 

/s Mitchel H. Boles 

Of Counsel 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 11/03/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 760.631 SURE guarantee calculation. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the SURE guarantee for a farm is the sum obtained by adding the dollar amounts calculated in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this section. ( 1 ) For each insurable crop on the farm except for value loss crops, 115 percent of the product obtained by multiplying together: ( i ) The price election. If a price election was not made or a participant is eligible as specified in §§ 760.105, 760.106, or 760.107, then the percentage of price will be 55 percent of the NAP established price;
( ii ) The payment acres determined according to § 760.632;
( iii ) The SURE yield as calculated according to § 760.638; and
( iv ) The coverage level elected by the participant. If a coverage level was not elected or a participant is eligible as specified in § 760.105, § 760.106, or § 760.107, a coverage level of 50 percent will be used in the calculation.
( 2 ) For each noninsurable crop on a farm except for value loss crops, 120 percent of the product obtained by multiplying: ( i ) 100 percent of the NAP established price for the crop;
( ii ) The payment acres determined according to § 760.632;
( iii ) The SURE yield calculated according to § 760.638; and
( iv ) 50 percent.
( 3 ) The guarantee for value loss crops as calculated according to § 760.634.
( 4 ) In the case of an insurable crop for which crop insurance provides for an adjustment in the guarantee liability, or indemnity, such as in the case of prevented planting, that adjustment will be used in determining the guarantee for the insurable crop.
( 5 ) In the case of a noninsurable crop for which NAP provides for an adjustment in the level of assistance, such as in the case of unharvested crops, that adjustment will be used for determining the guarantee for the noninsurable crop.
( b ) Those participants who are eligible according to § 760.105, § 760.106, or § 760.107 who do not have crop insurance or NAP coverage will have their SURE guarantee calculated based on catastrophic risk protection or NAP coverage available for those crops.
( c ) FSA will not include in the SURE guarantee the value of any crop that has a de minimis exception, according to § 760.613.
( d ) For crops where coverage may exist under both crop insurance and NAP, such as for pasture, rangeland, and forage, adjustments to the guarantee will be the product obtained by multiplying the county expected yield for that crop times: ( 1 ) 115 percent;
( 2 ) 100 percent of the NAP established price;
( 3 ) The payment acres determined according to § 760.632;
( 4 ) The SURE yield calculated according to § 760.638; and
( 5 ) The coverage level elected by the participant.
( e ) Participants who do not have a SURE yield as specified in § 760.638 will have a yield determined for them by the Deputy Administrator.
( f ) The SURE guarantee may not be greater than 90 percent of the sum of the expected revenue for each of the crops on a farm, as determined by the Deputy Administrator.
#### § 51.2836 Size classifications.

The size of onions may be specified in accordance with one of the following classifications.

| Size designation | Minimum diameter | | Maximum diameter | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Inches | Millimeters | Inches | Millimeters |
| Small | 1 | 25.4 | 21/4 | 57.2 |
| Repacker/Prepacker1 | 13/4 | 44.5 | 3 | 76.2 |
| Medium | 2 | 50.8 | 31/4 | 82.6 |
| Large or Jumbo | 3 | 76.2 | (2) | |
| Colossal | 33/4 | 95.3 | (2) | |
| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 In addition to the sizes specified, a lot of onions designated as Repacker or Prepacker shall contain at least 60 percent or more 2 inches or larger in diameter. | | | | |
| 2 No requirement. | | | | |