alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06cr169-WKW

) WO

DEMETRIOUS TERRELL PEGUES )

TERRENCE ANTWAN JEROME NEWKIRK )

WILLIAM EARL ULMER )

ORDER ON MOTION

All the defendants named above waived detention hearings, as they appeared for

initial appearance and arraignment in this court on writs from state custody. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that defendants are committed to the custody of the

Attorney General or his designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held

in custody pending appeal. Each defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for

private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on

request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility

shall deliver each defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance

in connection with a court proceeding.

DONE, this 8th day of March, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 119 Filed 03/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-CR-169-WKW

)

DEMETRIA MILLS )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the Hearing to Adjudicate the Validity of the Interest of TitleMax

of Alabama in the Property Ordered Forfeited scheduled for April 4, 2008, is CANCELLED.

The hearing is cancelled because in the Motion for a Final Order of Forfeiture the United

States concedes the validity of TitleMax’s interest. 

DONE this 3rd day of April, 2008.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 596 Filed 04/03/2008 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
13.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Rodman International Enterprise III,
Ltd.(the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Arnold P. Kling, President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
June 23, 2010





/s/ Arnold P. KlingArnold
      P. KlingPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
ex_106366.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


AMENDMENT NO. 2


 


This Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of February 27, 2018 by and between Adam K. Peterson (the “Executive”) and Boston Omaha Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 


 


The Company and the Executive are parties to an Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2015, which was amended pursuant to that certain Employment Agreement Amendment No. 1, dated as of June 5, 2017 (as so amended, the “Agreement”).


 


Now, therefore, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 


 


1.     Amendment to Article II, Section 2.01(A) of the Agreement. The Company and the Executive agree that the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting all of Article II, Section 2.01(A), and inserting the following in its place: 


 


“The Executive will serve for a Base Salary equal to the federal minimum wage until such time that Base Salary is otherwise modified by the Company’s Compensation Committee and shall not be entitled to any Base Salary in excess of the federal minimum wage for any period prior to such date.”


 


2.     No Other Amendment. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain unamended and in full force and effect. This Amendment is only effective in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which it is given and shall not be effective for any other purpose, and shall not be deemed to be a waiver of, amendment of, or consent to or modification of any other term or provision of the Agreement.


 


3.     Governing Law. This Amendment, the performance of this Amendment and any and all matters arising directly or indirectly herefrom shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, without giving effect to the conflict or choice of law provisions and principles thereof. 


 


4.     Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts including facsimile or PDF counterpart signature pages, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. 


 


	
			 

				
			BOSTON OMAHA CORPORATION

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			By:

				
			/s/ Alex B. Rozek

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			Name:      Alex B. Rozek

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			Title:        Co-Chief Executive Officer

				
			 

			
	 	 	 	 
	 	
			EXECUTIVE

				 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
			/s/ Adam K. Peterson

				 
	 	 	Adam K. Peterson
### Fw: proposed ozone rules and public comment perio d Susan Stone

to: crabtree.tricia 03/18/2010 03:10 PM Show Details

Tricia: Please docket this message (w ith forwarded enquiry). I called Ann, since she asked me to call. Her question was simple - if we get the co mments in sometime next week is that soon enough? I told her yes. Susan

Susan Lyon Stone A mbient Standards Group l US EPA (C504-06) l Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-1146 l Fax: 919-541-0237 l HSD Phone 919-966-6226

----- Forwarded by Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US on 03/18/2010 03:07 PM -----

Greetings Susan,

I am working through my leadership here on potentially submitting co mments to EPA re the proposed ozone standard (Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172). I understand the comment period ends Monday March 22. We may be at the wire in submitting comme nts. Can you please call me so I understand our options? (my contact info is below).

thanks for your time.

a.a. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ A nn L. Acheson USDA Forest Service National Air Program Manager 201 14th St. SW Washington, DC 20024 202-205-0800 (Desk) 202-236-4210 (Cell) aacheson@fs.fed.us www.fs.fed.us/ai r

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ From: Ann Acheson <aacheson@fs.fed.us>

To: Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 03/18/2010 02:32 PM

Subject: proposed ozone rules and public comment period 

### Page 1 of 1

3/18/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\tcrabtre\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notesFCBCEE\~web1237.h

...
#### § 58.319 Printing equipment.

All printing equipment shall be designed so as to adequately protect the product and be readily demountable for cleaning of product contact surfaces. All product contact surfaces shall be aluminum, stainless steel or equally corrosion resistant metal, or plastic, rubber and rubber like material which comply with 3-A standards, except that conveyors may be constructed of material which can be properly cleaned and maintained in a satisfactory manner.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30760]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Construction and 
Operation of a Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System 
(Pan-STARRS) at the Summit of Mauna Kea, HI

ACTION: Cancellation of Pan-STARRS EIS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 
1969, as amended (42 United States Code 4321, et seq.), the Council on 
Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural 
provisions of NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Parts 1500-
1508), and U.S. Air Force (USAF) policy and procedures (32 CFR part 
989), the USAF issued a notice on 10 Jan 07 advising the public of its 
intent to prepare an EIS evaluating potential environmental impacts 
associated with construction and operation of the proposed Panoramic 
Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) by the 
University of Hawaii (UH) Institute for Astronomy (IfA). Pan-STARRS was 
to be a USAF-funded, UH IfA research program to discover, characterize 
and track Near-Earth Objects (NEOs), primarily asteroids and comets, 
whose trajectories pass close enough to Earth that they may pose a 
danger of collision.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please direct any written comments or 
requests for information to Ms. Connie Rankin, Office of Public 
Affairs, 377 ABW/PA, 3550 Aberdeen Ave., SE., Kirtland AFB, NM 87117-
5776 (Phone: 505-846-4321; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d497bbbababdb1fa86b5babfbdba94bfbda6a0b8b5bab0fab5b2fab9bdb8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ecde1e0e0e7eba0dcefe0e5e7e0cee5e7fcfae2efe0eaa0efe8a0e3e7e2">[email protected]</span></a>).

Bao-Anh Trinh,
GS-14, DAF, Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-30760 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3027 

To suspend temporarily the duty on noils of camel hair. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on noils of camel hair. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NOILS OF CAMEL HAIR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.25 Noils of camel hair (provided 

for in subheading 

5103.10.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3027 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
52.203-5 Covenant Against Contingent Fees.

As prescribed in 3.404 , insert the following clause:

Covenant Against Contingent Fees (May 2014)

(a) The Contractor warrants that no person or agency has been employed or retained to solicit or

obtain this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a contingent fee, except a bona fide

employee or agency. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Government shall have the right to

annul this contract without liability or, to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or

otherwise recover, the full amount of the contingent fee.

(b) "Bona fide agency," as used in this clause, means an established commercial or selling agency,

maintained by a contractor for the purpose of securing business, that neither exerts nor proposes to

exert improper influence to solicit or obtain Government contracts nor holds itself out as being able

to obtain any Government contract or contracts through improper influence.

Bona fide employee, as used in this clause, means a person, employed by a contractor and subject to

the contractor’s supervision and control as to time, place, and manner of performance, who neither

exerts nor proposes to exert improper influence to solicit or obtain Government contracts nor holds

out as being able to obtain any Government contract or contracts through improper influence.

Contingent fee, as used in this clause, means any commission, percentage, brokerage, or other fee

that is contingent upon the success that a person or concern has in securing a Government contract.

Improper influence, as used in this clause, means any influence that induces or tends to induce a

Government employee or officer to give consideration or to act regarding a Government contract on

any basis other than the merits of the matter.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.203 [Reserved]
41.401 Monthly and annual review.

Agencies shall review utility service invoices on a monthly basis and all utility accounts with annual

values exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold on an annual basis. Annual reviews of accounts

with annual values at or below the simplified acquisition threshold shall be conducted when deemed

advantageous to the Government. The purpose of the monthly review is to ensure the accuracy of

utility service invoices. The purpose of the annual review is to ensure that the utility supplier is

furnishing the services to each facility under the utility’s most economical, applicable rate and to

examine competitive markets for more advantageous service offerings. The annual review shall be

based upon the facility’s usage, conditions and characteristics of service at each individual delivery

point for the most recent 12 months. If a more advantageous rate is appropriate, the Federal agency

shall request the supplier to make such rate change immediately.

Parent topic: Subpart 41.4 - Administration
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23- 0229 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. HALIE MARIA HERZOG,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Debra S . Kambel is granted an extension of time to and including September 7 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 12 2023

07/12/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0229
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

June 12, 2007

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY

 REGARDING CORPORATE/

CONFLICT STATEMENT

To: Counsel of Record

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: David Finney v. Nissan North America, Inc., et al. 

Case Number: #3:06-cv-00622-WKW

Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7.1, and this

Court’s General Order Miscellaneous Case No. 00-3047 parties are required to file their

Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement at their initial appearance.

No corporate/conflict disclosure statement has been filed by you in this action.

This deficiency must be corrected within ten (10) days from this date. Please refer to

attachment.

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 58 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MARIO S. FAULK,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-270-TKW/MJF

WILLIAM L. WRIGHT and CHRISTINA 

PUMPHREY,

Defendants.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 11). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s 

failure to comply with court orders. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with orders of this court.

Case 5:20-cv-00270-TKW-MJF Document 12 Filed 09/13/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close 

the case file.

DONE and ORDERED this 13th day of September, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00270-TKW-MJF Document 12 Filed 09/13/21 Page 2 of 2
### 1

VIA FDMS

October 2 , 2015
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Caterpillar Inc.

- Petition to Amend Exemption No. 12372 in Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1955

Dear Sir or Madam:

By letter dated August 6, 2015, the FAA granted Exemption No. 12372 i n Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1955 to Caterpillar Inc . (“Caterpillar”), authorizing Caterpillar to operate several models of UAS

– specifically, the Trimble UX 5 ; DJI Inspire I ; DJI Phantom; DJI Phantom 2; and Parrot Bebop

-- for certain commercial purposes detailed in the Grant of Exemption

. I write now to request that the Agency amend Caterpillar’s Exemption No. 12372 to authorize Caterpillar to o perate the DJI Phantom 3 and Trimble ZX5

.
Both t he DJI Phantom 3 and Trimble ZX5 are comparable in type, size, weight, speed, and operating capabilities to the UAS whose operations were authorized by the original grant. The agency has already determined that th ese air c ra f t meet the conditions of Section 333, and has already authorized other petitioners to operate the DJI Phantom 3 1 and Trimble ZX5 2

.
There have been no change s in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that formed the basis for the FAA granting the original exemption , and Caterpillar will comply with all of the terms and conditions imposed by Exemption No. 12372 , and update and maintai n its operations manuals for the new aircraft. B ecause the requested amendment would not set any precedent or raise any new issues, we request that the FAA issue a summary grant based on the preceding exemptions.
We will be happy to provide any further inf ormation that may be needed.
All communications regarding this petition should be directed to: Caterpillar Inc. 100 NE Adams Street Peoria, IL 61629 Attn : Gregory Harris Ph: 309

- 494

- 7622 Email: harris_gregory@cat.com

Very truly yours,

Gregory N. Harris Caterpillar Inc. Law & Public Policy/Legal Services Division 100 NE Adams Street Peoria, IL 61629

1 See Exemption No. 11 881A in Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1228 ( Empire Unmanned LLC )

. 2 See Exemption No. 11110B in Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0367 (Trimble Navigation Ltd )

.
§ 636.13 Violations and remedies. ( a ) If NRCS determines that a participant is in violation of a cost-share agreement, NRCS will give the parties to the cost-share agreement notice of the violation and a minimum of 60 days to correct the violation and comply with the terms of the cost-share agreement and attachments thereto.
( b ) If the participant fails to correct the violation of a cost-share agreement within the period provided by NRCS under paragraph (a) of this section, NRCS may terminate the agreement and require the participant to refund all or part of any of the funds issued under that cost-share agreement, plus interest, and may assess liquidated damages as indicated in the cost-share agreement appendix, as well as require the participant to forfeit all rights to any future payment under the agreement.
( c ) If NRCS terminates a cost-share agreement due to breach of contract, the participant will forfeit all rights to future payments under the agreement, may be required to pay liquidated damages in an amount determined by the State Conservationist in accordance with the terms of the agreement, and will refund all or part of the payments received, plus interest. Participants violating WHIP cost-share agreements may be determined ineligible for future NRCS-administered conservation program funding.
#### § 58.330 Butter starter cultures.

Harmless bacterial cultures when used in the development of flavor components in butter and related products shall have a pleasing and desirable flavor and shall have the ability to transmit these qualities to the finished product.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 231 (Thursday, December 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30294]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs

[OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1534]


Interview Room Video System Standard Special Technical Committee 
Request for Proposals for Certification and Testing Expertise

AGENCY: National Institute of Justice.

ACTION: Notice of Request for Proposals for Certification and Testing 
Expertise.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) is in the process of 
developing a new Interview Room Video System Standard and corresponding 
certification program requirements. This work is being performed by a 
Special Technical Committee (STC), comprised of practitioners from the 
field, researchers, testing experts, certification experts, and 
representatives from stakeholder organizations. It is anticipated that 
the STC members will participate in six 2-day meetings over a 12-month 
time period with the goal of completing development of the standard and 
certification program requirements. It is anticipated that STC meetings 
will begin in January 2011. Travel expenses and per diem will be 
reimbursed for all STC meetings; however, participation time will not 
be funded. NIJ is seeking representatives from (1) certification bodies 
and (2) test laboratories with experience in programs for similar types 
of electronic equipment. Additional preferred knowledge includes 
experience with video systems or experience with law enforcement 
operations. There are up to four positions to be filled on the STC, and 
NIJ will accept the first 20 submissions for review.
    Interested parties are requested to nominate individuals from their 
organizations and submit no more than two pages describing the 
nominee's applicable experience, preferred knowledge, and affiliations 
with standards development organizations. This information shall be 
submitted to Frances Scott at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3b5a1b2bdb0b6a0fda0b0bca7a793a6a0b7bcb9fdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cea8bcafa0adabbde0bdada1baba8ebbbdaaa1a4e0a9a1b8">[email protected]</span></a> by December 13, 
2010. The submissions will be reviewed, and participants will be 
notified regarding their acceptance by January 17, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frances Scott by telephone at 202-305-
9950 [Note: this is not a toll-free telephone number], or by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4e283c2f202d2b3d603d2d213a3a0e3b3d2a212460292138"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92f4e0f3fcf1f7e1bce1f1fde6e6d2e7e1f6fdf8bcf5fde4">[email protected]</span></a>.

John Laub,
Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2010-30294 Filed 12-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>