alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 33.5**

**REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH**

**§1122(d)(2)(vi) and §1122(d)(4)(xi)**

**of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA**

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc., collectively the“Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi),§1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs with respect to all mortgageloan-tracking transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all mortgage loan-tracking transactions for which the Asserting Party served as a Vendor on behalf of Servicers for such asset-backed securities transactions that wereregistered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Platform”). The scope of the Asserting Party assertions excludes §1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code ofFederal Regulations, which relates to servicing activities that are performed by the Asserting Party with respect to the Platform, but are not reported on herein.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with §1122(d)(2)(vi) and §1122(d)(4)(xi) ("the Applicable Servicing Criteria") for the ReportingPeriod and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. The Asserting Party used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d)of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteriaas of and for the Reporting Period ending December 31, 2006 as set forth in this assertion.

     American Security Insurance Company     Standard Guaranty Insurance Company     Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.

 

/s/ John Frobose       By: John Frobose            Senior Vice President

       Date: February 23, 2007
# Helsinki Human Rights Day, 2010

This year marks the 35th anniversary of the Helsinki Final Act, a seminal document tying lasting security among states with respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms within states.  With the signing of the Act on August 1, 1975, the United States, Canada, the Soviet Union, and the countries of a divided Europe solemnly pledged to work together to realize comprehensive security across the European continent.  This occasion also spurred courageous human rights activists in Eastern Europe to form citizens’ groups to press for the implementation of commitments their governments had made, launching the Helsinki movement.

The guiding principles set forth 35 years ago in the Helsinki Final Act, now institutionalized in the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), still serve as a beacon to all who strive for freedom and peace across the Euro-Atlantic region.  On this day, we reaffirm our sincere belief that security is indivisible, and must be rooted in confidence, cooperation, transparency, and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.  We also recommit to calling on fellow participating states to reexamine their compliance with their OSCE commitments.

The Helsinki Final Act, with its affirmation of fundamental human rights, inspired many who struggled against repressive regimes and for human dignity.  Today, a new generation of brave women and men work tirelessly—often risking their lives—to realize those same rights.  We stand with them and with all who advocate for the rights of their fellow citizens and for the betterment of their societies. 

Together, we will ensure the United States continues to serve as an example in both word and deed to the Helsinki principles.  As President Gerald Ford said to his fellow signatories at the signing of the Helsinki Final Act, history will judge us “not by the promises we make, but by the promises we keep.”

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim December 1, 2010, as Helsinki Human Rights Day.  I call upon all the people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 2010-30584

Billing code 3195-W1-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2775 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2775

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on electrical radio 
             broadcast receivers not combined with a clock.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2006

Mrs. Hutchison introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on electrical radio 
             broadcast receivers not combined with a clock.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELECTRICAL RADIO BROADCAST RECEIVERS NOT COMBINED WITH A 
              CLOCK.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.25 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to electrical radio broadcast 
receivers not combined with a clock) is amended by striking ``12/31/
2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COURTROOM DEPUTY’S MINUTES DATE: October 17, 2006 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA DIGITAL RECORDING: 8:35 - 8:41

/ARRAIGNMENT CHANGE OF PLEA  CONSENT PLEA

 RULE 44(c) HEARING  SENTENCING

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE: Susan Russ Walker DEPUTY CLERK: Joyce Taylor

CASE NUMBER: 2:06cr178-SRW DEFENDANT NAME: Carrie J. Flowers

AUSA: Laura Hansen DEFENDANT ATTORNEY: Ron Wise

Type counsel ( )Waived; ( / )Retained; ( )CJA; ( )FPD

( ) appointed at arraignment; ( ) standing in for: _______________

PTSO/USPO:

Interpreter present? ( / )NO; ( )YES Name:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/This is defendant’s FIRST APPEARANCE.

 Financial Affidavit executed. ORAL MOTION for appointment of Counsel.

 ORAL ORDER appointing Federal Public Defender. Notice of Appearance to be filed.

 WAIVER OF INDICTMENT executed and filed.

 INFORMATION filed.

 Juvenile Information filed w/Certificate that State Court refused jurisdiction.

PLEA: /Not Guilty

 Guilty as to:

 Count(s):

 Count(s):  dismissed on oral motion of USA

 to be dismissed at sentencing

 Written plea agreement filed  ORDERED SEALED

 ORAL ORDER Accepting Guilty Plea and Adjudicating Defendant Guilty as to Counts

/CRIMINAL TERM: 1/8/2007 / WAIVER OF SPEEDY TRIAL filed. 

 DISCOVERY DISCLOSURE DATE: 10/17/06

 ORDER: Defendant continued under  same bond;  summons; for:

 Trial on ____________;  Sentencing on ____________

 ORDER: Defendant remanded to custody of U. S. Marshal for:

 Trial on ________________; or  Sentencing on ______________

 Rule 44 Hearing:  Waiver of Conflict of Interest Form executed

 Defendant requests time to secure new counsel

Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 11 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 611.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part sets forth policy on soil survey operations of the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).
( b ) NRCS is responsible for soil survey activities of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). A soil survey provides: ( 1 ) An orderly, on-the-ground, scientific inventory of soil resources according to their potentialities and problems of use; and
( 2 ) Information about each kind of soil in sufficient detail to meet all reasonable needs of farmers, agricultural technicians, community planners, engineers, and scientists in planning and transferring the findings of research and experience to specific land areas.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 1:00cr15-SPM

WILLIAM H. BLACK,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR HOME CONFINEMENT

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant William H. Black’s

motion to serve the remainder of his sentence on home confinement (doc. 1206). 

For the following reasons, the motion will be denied.

1. A sentencing court has no authority to order a convicted defendant

to be designated to a particular facility or program. United States v. Johnson, 223

F.3d 665, 673 (7th Cir. 2000).

2. The Bureau of Prisons has the authority under Title 18, United

States Code, Section 3621(b), to designate the place of a prisoner’s

confinement. 

3. The Bureau of Prisons also has the authority under Title 18, United

States Code, Section 3624(c), to place a prisoner in home confinement for the

last ten percent of his prison term, not to exceed six months.

Case 1:00-cr-00015-MW-GRJ Document 1213 Filed 04/13/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

CASE NO.: 1:00cr15-SPM

4. A prisoner aggrieved by a Bureau of Prisons placement decision

may seek court review of the decision through a habeas corpus petition under

Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. See Woodall v. Federal Bureau of

Prisons, 432 F.3d 235, 241-44 (3d Cir. 2005); c.f. Richmond v. Scibina, 387 F.3d

602, 605-06 (explaining that prisoner challenging the substance of placement

decision should utilize Section 2241, but a challenge to the rules used to make a

placement decision should be made through the Administrative Procedure Act). 

5. “Section 2241 petitions may be brought only in the district court for

the district in which the inmate is incarcerated.” Fernandez v. United States, 941

F.2d 1488, 1495 (11th Cir. 1995). Because Defendant is not incarcerated within

this district, this Court has no jurisdiction to review the Bureau of Prisons’

placement decision. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant William H. Black’s motion to

serve the remainder of his sentence on home confinement (doc. 1206) is denied

for lack of jurisdiction.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of April, 2007.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 1:00-cr-00015-MW-GRJ Document 1213 Filed 04/13/07 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.850 Restrictions on redemption of Equity Securities. ( a ) *Restriction on redemption.* A Portfolio Concern cannot be required to redeem Equity Securities earlier than one year from the date of the first closing unless: ( 1 ) The Portfolio Concern makes a public offering, or has a change of management or control, or files for protection under the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, or materially breaches your Financing agreement; or
( 2 ) You make a follow-on Financing, in which case the new securities may be redeemed in less than one year, but no earlier than the redemption date associated with your earliest Financing of the Portfolio Concern.
( b ) *Redemption price.* The redemption price must be either: ( 1 ) A fixed amount that is no higher than the price you paid for the securities; or
( 2 ) An amount that cannot be fixed or determined before the time of the redemption. In this case, the redemption price must be based on: ( i ) A reasonable formula that reflects the performance of the Portfolio Concern (such as one based on earnings or book value); or
( ii ) The fair market value of the Portfolio Concern at the time of redemption, as determined by a professional appraisal performed under an agreement acceptable to both parties.
( c ) *Method.* Any method for determining the redemption price must be agreed upon no later than the date of the first (or only) closing of the Financing.
M a rch 2 004 Page 1 o f 1 

# About Harmful Algal Blooms

BACKGROUND Algae are vit a lly important to m arine an d fresh-water ecosy ste m s, a nd m o st speci es of algae ar e not har m ful. However, a harm ful algal bl oom (HAB) c a n occur when certain types of m i crosco pic algae grow quickl y in water, forming visible patches that may harm the health of the environm ent, plants, or ani m als. H A B s can deplet e the oxy g en and block the sun light that other organis m s need to live, and som e HAB-causing algae release toxins th at are dangerous to anim al s and hum ans. H A B s can occur in m arine, estuarine, and fresh water s , and HABs appear to be increasing along the coastlines and in the surface waters of the United States , according to the Nati onal Oceanic and At m o spheric Ad m i nistration (NOAA). Responding t o this suspected increase, t h e U.S. C ongress in 1998 passed a law t h at required NOAA to lead an Inter-Agency Task Force on Harmful Alga l Bloom s and Hy poxia, and funded research into th e origins, types, and possible hum an healt h effects of H A Bs.



### ASSES S ING THE IMPACT ON PUBLI C HEALTH Although scientists do not y e t understand full y how HAB s affect hum an health , authorities i n the United States and abroad are m onitoring HABs and developi ng guidelines for HAB-rel a ted public health action. The U.S. Environm ental Pr otection Agency (EPA) has added certai n algae associ ated with HA Bs to its Drinking Wat e r Contam inant Candidate List. This list identifies org a nism s and toxins that EPA believes are priorities for investigation.
CDC works with public health agencie s , universities, and federal partners to in vestigate how the following algae, which can cause H A Bs, may affect public health:



###  Cyanobacteria , also known as blue-green algae, can produ ce toxins that m a y taint drinking water and recreatio nal water. Hu mans who drink or swim in water that co ntains high concentrations of
cy anobacteria or c y anobact erial toxins may experi ence gastroenteritis, skin irritation, allergic responses, or liver damage.



###  Harm ful m a rine algae , such as those as sociated with red tides , occ u r in the ocea n and can produce toxins that m a y harm or kill fish a nd m arine animals. Hu mans who eat shellfish containing toxins produced by these algae may experience neurologic sy mp toms (such as tingling fingers or toe s ) and gastrointestinal sy mptom s . Breathing air that c ontains toxi n s fro m algae associat ed wi th red tide m a y cause susc e p tible individuals to have asth m a atta cks

.



###  Pfiesteria pis c icida , a single-celled orga nis m that lives in estuaries, has been found near large quantities of dead fish. Scientists do not y e t know whether P. piscicida affects human health. However, rep o rts about s y mp to ms such as headache, confusion, skin rash, and e y e irritatio n i n hum ans exposed to water containin g hig h concentrations of P. piscicida have pr ompted public

concern.



### For more in formation a bout HABs, go to the Links page.
52.216-25 Contract Definitization.

As prescribed in 16.603-4(b)(3), insert the following clause:

Contract Definitization (Oct 2010)

(a) A ______________ [insert specific type of contract] definitive contract is contemplated. The

Contractor agrees to begin promptly negotiating with the Contracting Officer the terms of a

definitive contract that will include (1) all clauses required by the Federal Acquisition Regulation

(FAR) on the date of execution of the letter contract, (2) all clauses required by law on the date of

execution of the definitive contract, and (3) any other mutually agreeable clauses, terms, and

conditions. The Contractor agrees to submit a ______ [insert specific type of proposal (e.g., fixedprice or cost-and-fee)] proposal, including data other than certified cost or pricing data, and certified

cost or pricing data, in accordance with FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, supporting its proposal.

(b) The schedule for definitizing this contract is [insert target date for definitization of the contract

and dates for submission of proposal, beginning of negotiations, and, if appropriate, submission of

make-or-buy and subcontracting plans and certified cost or pricing data]:

___________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________

(c) If agreement on a definitive contract to supersede this letter contract is not reached by the target

date in paragraph (b) of this section, or within any extension of it granted by the Contracting Officer,

the Contracting Officer may, with the approval of the head of the contracting activity, determine a

reasonable price or fee in accordance with subpart 15.4 and part 31 of the FAR, subject to

Contractor appeal as provided in the Disputes clause. In any event, the Contractor shall proceed

with completion of the contract, subject only to the Limitation of Government Liability clause.

(1) After the Contracting Officer’s determination of price or fee, the contract shall be governed by-

(i) All clauses required by the FAR on the date of execution of this letter contract for either fixedprice or cost-reimbursement contracts, as determined by the Contracting Officer under this

paragraph (c);

(ii) All clauses required by law as of the date of the Contracting Officer’s determination; and

(iii) Any other clauses, terms, and conditions mutually agreed upon.

(2) To the extent consistent with paragraph (c)(1) of this section, all clauses, terms, and conditions

included in this letter contract shall continue in effect, except those that by their nature apply only

to a letter contract.

(End of clause)

Alternate I (Apr 1984). In letter contracts awarded on the basis of price competition, add the

following paragraph (d) to the basic clause:

(d) The definitive contract resulting from this letter contract will include a negotiated _____________

[insert "price ceiling" or "firm fixed price"] in no event to exceed ___________________ [insert the

proposed price upon which the award was based].
Parent topic: 52.216 [Reserved]
Total Process

No.

Name and çtle of individual served (If not shown above). A person of suitable age and disrretion then U residing in the defendant's usual place of abode.

PRIOR EDITIONS MAY

BE USED

a

FORM USM 285 (Rev. J2115/80)

CLERK

U.S. Department of Justice PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (J1

United States Marshals Service See Instructions for "Service of Process by the U.S. Marshal

on the reverse of this form

PLAINTIFF COURT CASE NUMBER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2:06cr169-WKW

DEFENDANT TYPE OF PROCESS

JAMES CALVIN TALLEY PRELIMINARY ORDER OF

FORFEITURE

SERVE NAME OF INDIVIDUAL, COMPANY, CORPORATION, ETC. TO SERVE OR DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO SEIZE OR CONDEMN

I

AMY HAYES NAYLOR - Attorney at Law

AT ADDRESS (Street or RED, Apartment No., City, State, and ZIP Code)

104 1st AVENUE - CLANTON, ALABAMA 35046 51

SEND NOTICE OF SERVICE TO REQUESTER AT NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW I Number of prktø erve 1

-1wIththisForiq.r28S- , C)

John T. Harmon I Number of paesserved" L

United States Attorney s Office in is case

Assistant United States Attorney

Post Office Box 197 I CheckforservlçonVSA .

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197 .1 ___________

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR OTHER INFORMATION THAT WILL ASSIST IN EXPEDITING SERVICE (Include Business and Alternate Address, All

Telephone Numbers, and Estimated Times Available For Service)

Asset Identification No. 06-DEA-466449

______ requestisal sdrvic I TELEPHONE NUMBER I DATE

PLAINTIFF I I

Signature of Attooiginator r behalf of:

0 DEFENDANT I (334) 223-7280 1/4/08

BELOW FOR USE OF U.S. MARSHAL ONLY - DO NOT WRITE BELOW TILlS LINE

I acknowledge receipt for the total

number of process indicated.

(Sign only first USM 285 f more than

one USM 285 is submitted)

District of Origin District to Serve Signature

No.

f Au rized USMS Deputy or Cl;eik Date

I----- I1/7/

I hereby certify and return that I 0 have personally served, 0 have legal evidence of service, executed as shown in "Remarks", she process described oii

the individual, company, corporation, etc. at the address shown above or on the individual, company, corporation, etc., shown at the address inaertcd hekw.

0 i hereby certify and and return that I am unable to locate the individual, company, corporation, etc., named above (See remarks below).

Address (complete only (fthfferent than shown Date Time am

I

I

U.S.

Service Fee Total Mileage Charges Forwarding Fee Total Charges Advance Deposits Amoult Owed to US Marshal or Amount or Rcfuiid finc ng endeavors)

13 ____ -

REMAR7

4

p S V45Q9

ip t/2z'o ç'co 4ii tn— FtLED

ioj17

' ..,. Aflhl

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 500 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### § 58.706 General construction, repair and installation.

The equipment and utensils used for the handling and processing of cheese products shall be as specified in § 58.128 of this subpart. In addition, for certain other equipment the following requirements shall be met.