alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-1.htm


    
      	
               
      

            	
              Exhibit
      10.1

            


    

     

    HRPT PROPERTIES
TRUST

     

    Summary of Trustee
Compensation

     

    The following is
a summary of the currently effective compensation of the trustees of HRPT
Properties Trust (the “Company”) for services as trustees, which is subject to
modification at any time by the Board of Trustees.

     

    
      
        
          
            
              	
                      ·

                    	
                      Each
      independent trustee receives an annual fee of $30,000, plus a fee of $500
      for each meeting attended.  Up to two $500 fees are payable if a
      board meeting and one or more board committee meetings are held on the
      same date.

                    
	 	 
	
                      ·

                    	
                      The
      chairpersons of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the
      nominating and governance committee, each of whom is an independent
      trustee, receive an additional annual fee of $7,500, $3,500 and $3,500,
      respectively.

                    
	 	 
	
                      ·

                    	
                      Each
      trustee is entitled to receive a grant of 5,000 of the Company’s common
      shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first board meeting
      following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for trustees who are
      first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first board
      meeting attended).

                    
	 	 
	
                      ·

                    	
                      The Company
      generally reimburses all trustees for travel expenses incurred in
      connection with their duties as
trustees.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:02cr26-SPM/AK

OSCAR LEE LENTON,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

This cause comes before the Court upon Defendant Oscar Lee Lenton’s

notice of appeal, which has been treated in accordance with Federal Rule of

Appellate Procedure 22(b) and 28 United States Code, Section 2253(c), as a

motion for certificate of appealability. Docs. 120 and 121. The Court will not

issue a certificate of appealability because Defendant has failed to make a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 

For reasons explained in the Report and Recommendation (doc. 115),

Defendant’s indictment was not subject to dismissal under the Speedy Trial Act,

and there was no ineffective assistance of counsel in this regard. Likewise, there

was no ineffective assistance of counsel regarding the tape recorded statements

of Morris Ferrell. Mr. Ferrell’s statements were not hearsay and they were not

testimonial within the scope of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). See

Case 4:02-cr-00026-MW-AK Document 125 Filed 04/10/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

 CASE NO. 4:02cr26-SPM/AK

United States v. Wilson, No. 06-14859, 2007 WL 2174571, 238 Fed. Appx. 571,

574-75 (11th Cir. Jul. 30, 2007). There is no indication, moreover, to support

Defendant’s position that Mr. Ferrell would have testified favorably on his behalf if

called as a witness and that the testimony likely would have changed the

outcome of the proceedings. There was no ineffectiveness of counsel on

Defendant’s remaining claims regarding counsel’s failure to seek reconsideration

of the motion to suppress, failure to object to the Government’s vouching of

witnesses, and failure to make a motion for judgment of acquittal. Counsel’s

performance was not deficient in these regards and it did not likely affect the

outcome of the proceedings. Finally, Defendant’s claims of cumulative error and

ineffective assistance of appellate counsel have no merit because Defendant’s

trial counsel was not ineffective.

The resolution of this case is not debatable among reasonable jurists and

the issues do not deserve encouragement to appeal. Slack v. McDaniel, 529

U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion for certificate of appealability

(doc. 121) is denied. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of April, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cr-00026-MW-AK Document 125 Filed 04/10/08 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 1 of 11
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 2 of 11
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 3 of 11
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 4 of 11
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 5 of 11
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 6 of 11
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 7 of 11
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 8 of 11
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 9 of 11
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 10 of 11
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 11 of 11
Voluntary Reduction of Compensation letter----Mark A. Hoppe



 Exhibit 10.2 
 March 27, 2009 
 Via Electronic Mail 
 Compensation Committee of 
 The Board of Directors 
 Taylor Capital Group, Inc. 
 9550 West Higgins Road 
 Rosemont, Illinois 60018 
 Re: Voluntary Reduction in Compensation 
 Dear Fellow Board Members, 
 As you know, we have engaged in aggressive
cost-cutting efforts at all levels of our organization in response to the continuing challenging economic conditions. These initiatives have led to significant savings and thereby enhanced our ability to preserve capital and execute on our growth
strategy. 
 With your oversight, management has specifically focused on ways in which to reduce our overall compensation expense. As part of our efforts in
this area, I have evaluated my own compensation and believe that it would be appropriate for me to forego certain elements of my compensation until market conditions and our performance improves. To that end, I hereby offer and agree to forego my
auto allowance and reimbursements for country club expenditures (with the exception of expenses directly associated with customer events). I have also agreed to a 22% reduction in my guaranteed bonus for 2008 (from $300,000 to $233,000). 

I would ask that you re-evaluate my compensation at September 30, 2009 and on a quarterly basis thereafter and, if appropriate, restore my auto allowance and
country club expense reimbursements in accordance with corporate policy. 
 Thank you for your continued leadership and please let me know if you have any
questions or would like to discuss this matter further. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	 /s/ Mark A. Hoppe

	Mark A. Hoppe
	President

  

 1
-78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:89cr4006-WS

KENNETH B. GASTON,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 769)

docketed October 2, 2007. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

motion for nunc pro tunc correction of sentence (doc. 768) be denied. The defendant

has filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 769) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

Case 4:89-cr-04006-WS-WCS Document 771 Filed 11/13/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:89cr4006-WS

2. The defendant’s motion for nunc pro tunc correction of sentence (doc. 768) is

hereby DENIED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of November , 2007.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:89-cr-04006-WS-WCS Document 771 Filed 11/13/07 Page 2 of 2
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS
EASTLAND , TEXAS
JUDGMENT

Carl Edward Duhamel
, * From the 2 44 th District Court of E ctor County, Trial Court No. C

- 2 0

- 0 599

- CR

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 192

- CR * May 30 , 20 2 4

The State of Texas
, * Memorand um Opinion by Trotter , J. (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J., Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-618-MEF 

)

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. # 57) filed

on August 7, 2007, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

DONE this the 9 day of August, 2007. 

th

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 58 Filed 08/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT L. BERRY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 3:20cv6030-RV/HTC

BOYETT’S VACUUM PUMPING INC.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice (doc. 13),

it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) This case is dismissed, with prejudice and without taxation of costs.

(2) In the event settlement that is not consummated for any reason, the Court

reserves the power, upon motion filed by either side within sixty (60) days after this

date, to amend, alter or vacate and set aside this order of dismissal.

DONE and ORDERED this 12th day of August, 2021

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:20-cv-06030-RV-HTC Document 15 Filed 08/12/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7305-7306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 35351]


Drake Switching Company, LLC--Operation Exemption-- Drake Cement, 
LLC

    Drake Switching Company, LLC (DSC), a noncarrier, has filed a 
verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to operate 
approximately 4.12 miles of rail lines, located near Drake, Yavapai 
County, AZ, as follows: (1) A railroad yard consisting of six tracks 
(Tracks A-F) totaling approximately 3.46 miles (the Yard); and (2) two 
tracks (Track G and H) that extend approximately 0.66-miles, between 
Track C in the Yard and the facilities to be owned and operated by 
Drake Cement, LLC.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Drake Cement, LLC filed a verified notice of exemption to 
acquire these track in STB Finance Docket No. 35350, Drake Cement, 
LLC--Acquisition Exemption--Clarkdale Arizona Central Railroad, LLC.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 7306]]

    DSC certifies that the projected annual revenues as a result of the 
proposed transaction will not exceed those that would qualify it as a 
Class III carrier.
    DSC states that it expects the transaction to be consummated no 
earlier than 30 days after the filing of the notice. The earliest this 
transaction can be consummated is March 4, 2010, the effective date of 
the exemption (30 days after the exemption was filed).
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the 
exemption. Stay petitions must be filed no later than February 25, 2010 
(at least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective).
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 35351, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a 
copy of each pleading must be served on Thomas F. McFarland, Thomas F. 
McFarland, P.C., 208 South LaSalle Street, <greek-i>1890, Chicago, IL 
60604-1112.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at 
http:www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: February 12, 2010.

    By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Andrea Pope-Matheson,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010-3059 Filed 2-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Halcyon Jets Holdings, Inc. (the
‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending January 31, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I,
      Jonathan Gilbert, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                May 15, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Jonathan GilbertJonathan
                Gilbert
              Chief
                Executive Officer




This
      certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-KSB pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
      by
      such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required
      by
      Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

January 28, 2008

NOTICE OF ERROR

To: All Counsel of Record

Case Style: Black v. Glover, et al

Case Number: 1:03cv00734-MEF

Referenced Pleading: Partial Filing Fee Receipt

Docket Entry Number: 49

The referenced receipt was filed on ***December 28, 2007*** in this case and is hereby

STRICKEN as an erroneous docket entry. This should have been applied to civil action

1:03cv583-MEF. 

Parties are instructed to disregard #49 docketing entry, which has been stricken from the

record as a clerical error.

Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 50 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 4.13**

**Power of Attorney**

We, Beijing Century Friendship Education InvestmentCo., Ltd, the undersigned shareholder of Beijing New Oriental Education & Technology (Group) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “New Oriental China”), hereby authorize Beijing Hewstone Technology Co., Ltd.(hereinafter referred to as “Beijing Hewstone”) as our proxy to exercise shareholder’s right representing 10% of New Oriental China’s voting shares as Beijing Hewstone may deem appropriate or necessary. 

Beijing Century Friendship Education Investment Co., Ltd. 

Signature: /s/Authorized Signatory

April 23, 2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; Biomed-ISS 2011/01.                    

*Date:*                         January 28, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ruth Grossman, DDS, Scientific Review Officer,  National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 960, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-496-8775.                         *grossmanrs@mail.nih.gov*.                    

Dated: November 23, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-30086 Filed 11-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2776 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on electrical radio broadcast 

receivers combined with a clock. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2006 

Mrs. HUTCHISON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on electrical 

radio broadcast receivers combined with a clock. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELECTRICAL RADIO BROADCAST RECEIVERS 

4 COMBINED WITH A CLOCK. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.24 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 electrical radio broadcast receivers combined with a clock) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/ 

9 31/2009’’. 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 2776 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### § 58.626 Packaging equipment.

Packaging equipment designed to mechanically fill and close single service containers with frozen desserts shall be constructed so that all product contact surfaces shall be of stainless steel or equally corrosion-resistant metal. All product contact surfaces shall be easily accessible for cleaning. The design and operation of the machine shall in no way contaminate the container of the finished product placed therein. New or replacement equipment shall comply with the 3A Sanitary Standards for Equipment for Packaging Frozen Desserts and Cottage Cheese.
#### § 789.73 Communications.

Except as otherwise provided, all communications concerning this part, including requests for copies of this part and explanatory information, requests for guidance or clarification, and submission of appeals as specified in § 789.61 will be addressed to the Administrator, Farm Service Agency, Room 4752, Mail Stop 0512, USDA, 1400 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20250-0512 or email: *FSA.EPD@wdc.usda.gov.* This address is also to be used for requests for adjustments or exceptions to the Farm Service Agency Deputy Administrator for Management as specified in § 789.60.
52.246-16 Responsibility for Supplies.       As prescribed in 46.316, insert the following clause:          Responsibility for Supplies (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            Titleto supplies furnished under this contract shall pass to the Government upon formal acceptance, regardless of when or where the Government takes physical possession, unless the contract specifically provides for earlier passage of title.                                          (b) 						            Unless the contract specifically provides otherwise, risk of loss of or damage to supplies shall remain with the Contractor until, and shall pass to the Government upon-                                                         (1) 								                Delivery of the supplies to a carrier, if transportation is f.o.b. origin; or                                                            (2) 								                Acceptance by the Government or delivery of the supplies to the Government at the destination specified in the contract, whichever is later, if transportation is f.o.b. destination.                                                                             (c) 						            Paragraph (b) of this clause shall not apply to supplies that so fail to conform to contract requirements as to give a right of rejection. The risk of loss of or damage to such nonconforming supplies remains with the Contractor until cure or acceptance. After cure or acceptance, paragraph (b) of this clause shall apply.                                          (d) 						            Under paragraph (b) of this clause, the Contractor shall not be liable for loss of or damage to supplies caused by the negligence of officers, agents, or employees of the Government acting within the scope of their employment.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.246 [Reserved]
EE-RMISTD-98-440 i7 Ut f

Congress of the United States

House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515

Do your constituents know about...

THE S TO PAY

$240 MORE PER WASHER?!

$274 MORE FOR A/C?!

$486 MORE FOR A HEAT PUMP?!

THE 4(jJ6,9 TO BUY

PRODUCTS WE REFUSE TO BUY NOW?!

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 73FFD

Congress of the U niteJ States 

House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 205JL5 

Do your constituents know about ... 

THEMAtlQg"i: TOPAY 

$240 MORE PER WASHER?! 

$274 MORE FOR AlC?! 

$486 MORE FOR A HEAT PUMP?! 

THE MANIlD:' TO BUY 

PRODUCTS WE REFUSE TO BUY NOW?!