alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 52.1006 Color. ( a ) (*A*) *classification.* Whole or pitted dates that possess a good color may be given a score of 18 to 20 points. “Good color” means that the color of the dates is practically uniform; and, with respect to dates that are predominantly light amber in color, there may be not more than 5 percent by count of dates that are dark amber in color; and, with respect to dates that are predominantly dark amber in color, there may be not more than 5 percent by count of dates that are light amber in color.
( b ) (*B*) *classification.* If the whole or pitted dates or whole dry dates for processing possess a reasonably good color, a score of 16 or 17 points may be given. Dates that fall into this classification shall not be graded above U.S. Grade B or U.S. Choice or U.S. Grade B (Dry) or U.S. Choice (Dry), whichever is applicable, regardless of the total score for the product (this is a limiting rule). “Reasonably good color” means that the color of the whole or pitted dates or whole dry dates for processing is reasonably uniform for the type; and, with respect to dates that are predominantly light amber in color, there may be not more than 10 percent by count of dates that are dark amber in color; and, with respect to dates that are predominantly dark amber in color, there may be not more than 10 percent by count of dates that are light amber in color.
( c ) (*C*) *classification.* If the whole or pitted dates, whole dry dates for processing, date pieces, or macerated dates possess a fairly good color, a score of 14 or 15 points may be given. Dates that fall into this classification shall not be graded above U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard or U.S. Grade C (Dry) or U.S. Standard (Dry), whichever is applicable, regardless of the total score for the product (this is a limiting rule). “Fairly good color” has the following meanings with respect to the following styles: ( 1 ) *Whole; pitted.* The color of the whole or pitted dates or whole dry dates for processing is fairly uniform for the type; and, with respect to dates that are predominantly light amber in color, there may be not more than 20 percent by count of dates that are dark amber in color; and, with respect to dates that are predominantly dark amber in color, there may be not more than 20 percent by count of dates that are light amber in color.
( 2 ) *Pieces; macerated.* The color may be variable throughout the units or mass, may be slightly dull but not off-color, and is typical of properly prepared dates of these styles.
( d ) (*SStd*) *classification.* Dates that fail to meet the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section may be given a score of 0 to 13 points and shall not be graded above Substandard, regardless of the total score for the product (this is a limiting rule).
#### § 714.41 Statement of claim.

The claim shall show fully the facts constituting the basis of the claim; the name and address of and the amount claimed by every person who bore or bears any part or all of the burden of such penalty; and the reasons why such penalty is claimed to have been erroneously, illegally, or wrongfully collected. It shall be the responsibility of the county committee to determine that any person who executes a claim as agent or fiduciary is properly authorized to act in such capacity. There should be attached to the claim all pertinent documents with respect to the claim or duly authenticated copies thereof.
Case 4:20-cv-00526-AW-MJF   Document 2   Filed 11/05/20   Page 1 of 1
52.229-1 State and Local Taxes.       As prescribed in 29.401-1, insert the following clause:          State and Local Taxes (Apr 1984)          Notwithstanding the terms of the Federal, State, and Local Taxes clause, the contract price excludes all State and local taxes levied on or measured by the contract or sales price of the services or completed supplies furnished under this contract. The Contractor shall state separately on its invoices taxes excluded from the contract price, and the Government agrees either to pay the amount of the taxes to the Contractor or provide evidence necessary to sustain an exemption.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.229 [Reserved]
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Forest Road Stormwater Discharges 

FROM: Prasad Chumble

Rural Branch

Water Permits Division, 4203M

TO: The File

DATE: 5/26/16

EPA met with the National Alliance of Forest Owners (NAFO) and other industry stakeholders on 3/1/16, 

to discuss the potential of the regulation of stormwater discharges from forest roads under section 

402(p)(6) of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The stakeholders described the variety of best management 

practices (BMP) programs that are being implemented to reduce stormwater runoff from forest roads. 

The stakeholders also discussed the increasing importance of third party certifications.
# L_2014294DE.01005701.xml

| 10.10.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 294/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 294/57

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 269/2014 des Rates vom 17. März 2014 über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts von Handlungen, die die territoriale Unversehrtheit, Souveränität und Unabhängigkeit der Ukraine untergraben oder bedrohen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 78 vom 17. März 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 78 vom 17. März 2014

Auf Seite 6, im siebten Erwägungsgrund:

anstatt:

| „(7) | Die Befugnis zur Änderung der Liste im Anhang I dieser Verordnung sollte angesichts der ernsten politischen Lage in der Ukraine und zur Gewährleistung der Kohärenz mit dem Verfahren zur Änderung und Überprüfung des Anhangs des Beschlusses 2014/145/GASP vom Rat wahrgenommen werden.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(7)

Die Befugnis zur Änderung der Liste im Anhang I dieser Verordnung sollte angesichts der ernsten politischen Lage in der Ukraine und zur Gewährleistung der Kohärenz mit dem Verfahren zur Änderung und Überprüfung des Anhangs des Beschlusses 2014/145/GASP vom Rat wahrgenommen werden.“

muss es heißen:

| „(7) | Die Befugnis zur Änderung der Liste im Anhang I dieser Verordnung sollte angesichts der ernsten politischen Lage in der Ukraine und zur Wahrung der Übereinstimmung mit dem Verfahren zur Änderung und Überprüfung des Anhangs des Beschlusses 2014/145/GASP vom Rat ausgeübt werden.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(7)

Die Befugnis zur Änderung der Liste im Anhang I dieser Verordnung sollte angesichts der ernsten politischen Lage in der Ukraine und zur Wahrung der Übereinstimmung mit dem Verfahren zur Änderung und Überprüfung des Anhangs des Beschlusses 2014/145/GASP vom Rat ausgeübt werden.“

---
219.811-3 Contract clauses.

(1) Use the clause at 252.219-7009, Section 8(a) Direct Award, instead of the clauses at FAR

52.219-11, Special 8(a) Contract Conditions, FAR 52.219-12, Special 8(a) Subcontract Conditions,

and FAR 52.219-17, Section 8(a) Award, in solicitations and contracts processed in accordance with

the PA cited in 219.800.

(2) Use the clause at 252.219-7010, Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a)

Participants—Partnership Agreement, in lieu of the clause at FAR 52.219-18, Notification of

Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Participants, in competitive solicitations and contracts,

including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial

products and commercial services, when the acquisition is accomplished using the procedures of

FAR 19.805 and processed in accordance with the PA cited in 219.800.

(3) Use the clause at 252.219-7011, Notification to Delay Performance, in solicitations and purchase

orders issued under the PA cited in 219.800.

Parent topic: 219.811 Preparing the contracts.
#### § 52.44 Inspection fees when charges for sampling have been collected.

For any lot of processed products from which a sample in drawn by a licensed sampler and the applicable sampling fee is collected, as provided in § 52.43, the fees for the other inspection services with respect to such lot shall not include charges for sampling.

[48 FR 12326, Mar. 24, 1983]
----

**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | the                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q                  of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the“Report”)                  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                  of the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                  and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                  information contained in the                  Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial                  condition                  and results of operations of the                  Company. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                  May 14, 2007 | /s/                  ANDREW A. FARINA        |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                         |
|                                 |                                         |
|                                 | Andrew                  A. Farina            |
|                                 | Principal                  Financial Officer |

----
EX-34 (e)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
1601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Members
Regulus Group LLC:

We have examined management's assessment for those customers that
management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included
in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those
issuers of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables
portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions
(the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Regulus Group LLC
has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable
to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included
testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and
securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing
activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company
processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in
compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited
to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company
during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our
tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by
the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected
transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides
a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Philadelphia, PA
February 22, 2007


KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
52.247-10 Net Weight-General Freight.       As prescribed in 47.207-4(a)(2), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for transportation or for transportation-related services when the weight of shipments of freight other than household goods or office furniture is not known at the time of shipment and the contractor is responsible for determining the net weight of the shipments:          Net Weight-General Freight (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            The net weight of the shipment shall be determined by deducting the tare weight of the vehicle (determined by having the empty vehicle with a full tank of fuel weighed by a certified weighmaster on a certified scale) from the gross weight of the vehicle (determined by having the loaded vehicle with a full tank of fuel weighed by a certified weighmaster on a certified scale).                                          (b) 						            The Contractor shall attach the original copies of the empty and loaded weight certificates to the invoice for services.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
#### § 795.22 Interpretations.

In interpretations previously issued pursuant to the payment limitation regulations and published at 36 FR 16569, 37 FR 3049, 39 FR 15021 and 41 FR 17527 shall be applicable in construing the provisions of this part.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LAVAROS DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5935-MCR-HTC

SGT. DANIELS, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Lavaros Davis’ “Notice of Defendants 

Continually Threatening Me Through Their Co-Workers/Agents.” ECF Doc. 60. 

Due to the nature of Plaintiff’s notice, the clerk is directed to send to Walker 

Clemmons, Warden at Santa Rosa Correctional Institution, 5850 East Milton Road, 

Milton, FL 32583, courtesy copies of Plaintiff’s notice (ECF Doc. 60) and this order, 

for whatever action may be deemed appropriate in light of Plaintiff’s allegations. 

This is merely a notification to an appropriate official and not a ruling on the merits 

of the notice. Indeed, other than directing the clerk to send this Order and Plaintiff’s 

notice to the Warden, the Court does not plan to take any other action on the 

allegations contained in the notice as they are not part of this litigation. Moreover, 

Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 64 Filed 03/14/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5935-MCR-HTC

Plaintiff is reminded that he must exhaust his administrative remedies before seeking 

relief from this Court. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of March, 2022.

/s/ Hope Thai Cannon

HOPE THAI CANNON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 64 Filed 03/14/22 Page 2 of 2
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00389

- CV

Peter David Wagner d/b/a Preservation of Your Home and Educational Ministries , Appellant

v. Texas Department of Savings and Mortgage Lending , Appellee

FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT C OURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- GN

- 20

- 004218 , THE HONORABLE JAN SOIFER , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R
PER CURIAM Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due on September 23, 2021. On
counsel’s motion , the time for filing was extended to January 7, 20 22. Appellant’s counsel has
now filed a second motion, requesting that the Court extend the time for filing appellant’s brief.
We grant the motion for extension of time and order appella nt to file a brief no later than January 28, 2022 . No further extensio n of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a).
It is ordered on Jan uary 7, 2 022
.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7212

DAVID JAMES BARROW, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-00-637-2, CA-00-771-2) Submitted: November 14, 2001 Decided: December 12, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David James Barrow, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: David James Barrow seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Barrow v. Angelone , Nos. CA-00-637-2; CA00-771-2 (E.D. Va. June 20, 2001). We also deny Barrow’s motion to strike the affidavit of Henry Allen Thompson, Sr. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# L_2014262EN.01000601.xml

| 2.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 262/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 262/6

---

EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION

of 30 August 2014

appointing the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy

(2014/639/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 18(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | European Council Decision 2009/950/EU, taken with the agreement of the President of the Commission (1), of 4 December 2009, appointed the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy until 31 October 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

European Council Decision 2009/950/EU, taken with the agreement of the President of the Commission (1), of 4 December 2009, appointed the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy until 31 October 2014.

| (2) | In accordance with Article 17(7), third subparagraph, of the Treaty on European Union, the President, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the other members of the Commission are subject as a body to a vote of consent by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with Article 17(7), third subparagraph, of the Treaty on European Union, the President, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the other members of the Commission are subject as a body to a vote of consent by the European Parliament.

| (3) | The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy should be appointed for the period from the end of the current term of office of the Commission until 31 October 2019. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy should be appointed for the period from the end of the current term of office of the Commission until 31 October 2019.

| (4) | The President-elect has agreed to the appointment of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The President-elect has agreed to the appointment of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Federica MOGHERINI is hereby appointed High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy for the period from the end of the current term of office of the Commission until 31 October 2019.

Article 2

This Decision shall be notified to Ms Federica MOGHERINI by the President of the European Council.

It shall take effect on the day of its notification.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 August 2014.

For the European Council

The President

H. VAN ROMPUY

---

(1)  
  OJ L 328, 15.12.2009, p. 69.

1

---
§ 760.1101 Administration. ( a ) This program is administered under the general supervision of the Administrator, Farm Service Agency (FSA).
( b ) FSA representatives do not have authority to modify or waive any of the provisions of the regulations of this subpart.
( c ) The State FSA committee must take any action required by the regulations of this subpart that the county FSA committee has not taken. The State committee must also: ( 1 ) Correct, or require a county committee to correct, any action taken by such county committee that is not in accordance with the regulations of this subpart; or
( 2 ) Require a county committee to withhold taking any action that is not in accordance with this subpart.
( d ) No provision or delegation to a State or county FSA committee will preclude the FSA Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs (Deputy Administrator), or a designee of such, from determining any question arising under the program or from reversing or modifying any determination made by a State or county FSA committee.
( e ) The Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs may authorize state and county committees to waive or modify nonstatutory deadlines or other program requirements in cases where lateness or failure to meet such does not adversely affect the operation of the program.
#### § 51.1875 Misshapen.

*Misshapen* means that the tomato is decidedly kidney-shaped, lop-sided, elongated, angular or otherwise decidedly deformed: *Provided,* That the shape is not affected to an extent that the appearance or the edible quality of the tomato is very seriously affected.