alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 652.21 Certification criteria and requirements. ( a ) To qualify for certification an individual must: ( 1 ) Have the required technical training, education, and experience to perform the level of technical assistance for which certification is sought;
( 2 ) Meet any applicable professional or business licensing or similar qualification standards established by State or Tribal law;
( 3 ) Demonstrate, through documentation of training or experience, familiarity with NRCS guidelines, criteria, standards, and specifications as set forth in the applicable NRCS manuals, handbooks, field office technical guides, and supplements thereto for the planning and applying of specific conservation practices and management systems for which certification is sought; and
( 4 ) Not be decertified in any State under subpart C of this part at the time of application for certification.
( b ) To qualify for certification an entity or public agency must be authorized to provide such services in the jurisdiction and have a certified individual providing, in accordance with this part, technical services on its behalf.
( c ) A technical service provider, as part of the certification by NRCS, must enter into a Certification Agreement with NRCS specifying the terms and conditions of the certification, including adherence to the requirements of this part, and acknowledging that failure to meet these requirements may result in ineligibility to receive payments from the Department, either directly or through the participant, for the technical services provided or may result in decertification.
( d ) NRCS will certify Technical Service Providers for a time period specified by NRCS in the Certification Agreement, not to exceed 3 years. Decertification and Renewal of Certification is administered in accordance with § 652.26.
( e ) NRCS may, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 9701, establish and collect fees for the certification of technical service providers.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KELVIN WIGGINS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:04-cv-00016-MP-AK

PAUL BURG,

LARRY CAMPBELL,

MEDICAL STAFF,

WILLIAM PRIMAS,

Defendants.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 28, Report and Recommendations, in which the

Magistrate Judge recommends that Doc. 24, a Motion to Dismiss later construed as a Motion for

Summary Judgment because evidentiary materials were attached, be granted for failure to

exhaust administrative remedies. Objections to Report and Recommendation were due by

August 9, 2005, but plaintiff did not file any. Instead, he moved (doc. 31) to amend his

complaint, but did not specify the amendments he would offer. 

Plaintiff alleges that he fell down some stairs and injured his back. He further claims that

although he received some medical treatment from the prison medical staff, it was not sufficient

and constituted deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. It is clear from the materials

provided by plaintiff and defendant, however, that plaintiff has failed to exhaust administrative

remedies. Although Plaintiff has provided the Court with a number of grievances and medical

request forms, all of them were filed after the complaint was filed and nearly one year after

Plaintiff allegedly fell down the stairs and was denied treatment. Plaintiff therefore did not avail

Case 4:04-cv-00016-MP-AK Document 33 Filed 09/07/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:04-cv-00016-MP-AK

himself of the prison grievance procedure in a timely manner. Dismissal is mandated in such

circumstances, and amendment of the complaint would not be likely to remedy the situation. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The motion to amend complaint (doc. 31) is denied.

2. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 28) is adopted

and incorporated herein.

3. This action is DISMISSED, and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of September, 2005

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-00016-MP-AK Document 33 Filed 09/07/05 Page 2 of 2
§ 656.3 Policy. ( a ) NRCS recognizes that significant historical, archeological, and architectural resources are an important part of our national heritage, the protection of which requires careful consideration in this agency's project planning and implementation process.
( b ) NRCS will take reasonable precautions to avoid damaging any significant historic, cultural, or natural aspects of our national heritage and will work with the National Park Service (NPS) and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) in identifying and seeking to avoid or mitigate adverse effects of NRCS-assisted projects on the Nation's significant cultural resources. The procedures contained in this part have been developed to comply with sections 1(3) and 2(c) of Executive Order 11593.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2517 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chlorobenzaldehyde. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chlorobenzaldehyde. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-CHLOROBENZALDEHYDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.72 4-Chlorobenzaldehyde (CAS 

No. 104–88–1) (provided for 

in subheading 2913.00.40) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 2517 IS 

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
52.232-14 Notice of Availability of Progress Payments Exclusively for Small Business Concerns.       As prescribed in 32.502-3(b)(2), insert the following provision in invitations for bids if it is anticipated that (a) both small business concerns and others may submit bids in response to the same invitation and (b) only the small business bidders would need progress payments:          Notice of Availability of Progress Payments Exclusively for Small Business Concerns (Apr 1984)          The Progress Payments clause will be available only to small business concerns. Any bid conditioned upon inclusion of a progress payment clause in the resulting contract will be rejected as nonresponsive if the bidder is not a small business concern.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.232 [Reserved]
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2977509-DEC-201001:36 PM
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Chatsworth Acquisitions I, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Henry F. Schlueter certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 22, 2012
/s/ Henry F. Schlueter

Henry F. Schlueter Principal Executive Officer
Case 1:21-cv-00009-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:21-cv-00009-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:21-cv-00009-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:21-cv-00009-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:21-cv-00009-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:21-cv-00009-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:21-cv-00009-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:21-cv-00009-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:21-cv-00009-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:21-cv-00009-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:21-cv-00009-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:21-cv-00009-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:21-cv-00009-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:21-cv-00009-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 14 of 14
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DUE PROCESS, LTD., a foreign

corporation and JOHN GLIHA,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:03cv580/MCR/MD

ALTERNATIVE DEBT SERVICES,

INC., a Florida Corporation, f/d/b/a 

AGGRESSIVE MARKETING and 

MANAGEMENT, INC., and ALTERNATIVE

DEBT SOLUTIONS; JEN DEVINE; TOM

ROBERTS; JOHN BRIAN McLANE, JR.;

MEAGHAN MAILTO; AND PATRICK OLIVE,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge'sreport and

recommendation dated April 11, 2007. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the

report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de

novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having consideredthe reportandrecommendation and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The plaintiffs’ motion for final default judgment (doc. 110) is GRANTED

and default judgment is entered against defendants Alternative Debt Services, Inc.,

Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 123 Filed 05/14/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 3:03cv580/MCR/MD

a Florida Corporation f/d/b/a Aggressive Marketing and Management, Inc., and

Alternative Debt Solutions for damages for breach of contract in the amount of

$196,877.84, for damages for copyright infringement in the amount of $1,673,702.27,

and with prejudgment interest as of the date of the final judgment, in accordance

with the calculations set forth in the report and recommendation. Plaintiffs’ counsel

is required to submit appropriate supporting documentation to sustain an award of

reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs within thirty days from the date of this order.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of May, 2007.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 123 Filed 05/14/07 Page 2 of 2
52.244-5 Competition in Subcontracting.

As prescribed in 44.204(c), insert the following clause:

Competition in Subcontracting (Dec 1996)

(a) The Contractor shall select subcontractors (including suppliers) on a competitive basis to the

maximum practical extent consistent with the objectives and requirements of the contract.

(b) If the Contractor is an approved mentor under the Department of Defense Pilot Mentor-Protégé

Program (Pub.L.101-510, section 831 as amended), the Contractor may award subcontracts under

this contract on a noncompetitive basis to its protégés.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.244 [Reserved]
52.238 [Reserved]

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 5:95cr5030-SPM

LUIS GATO,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant Luis Gato’s letter

dated August 10, 2011, requesting a sentence reduction under the Fair

Sentencing Act and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Doc. 77. Defendant also filed a

memorandum (doc. 78) and the Government filed a response (doc. 80). 

Because Defendant was held accountable for 8.4 kilograms or more of

cocaine base1

, his guideline range does not change when the guideline

amendments are applied. Therefore, the Court is without jurisdiction to reduce

Defendant’s sentence. See United States v. Jones, 548 F.3d 1366, 1369 (11th

Cir. 2008) (district court lacks authority to educe a sentence based on a

1

 Defendant was held responsible for between 20 to 30 kilograms of

cocaine base, not powder cocaine as he states in his memorandum (doc. 78).

Case 5:95-cr-05030-RH Document 81 Filed 01/04/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

retroactive guideline amendment when the amendment does not reduce the

defendant’s guideline range). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Defendant’s motion for reduction of

sentence (doc. 77) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of January, 2012.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 5:95cr5030-SPM

Case 5:95-cr-05030-RH Document 81 Filed 01/04/12 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE SKANSKA USA CIVIL

SOUTHEAST INC AND SKANSKA

USA INC.,

CASE NO. 3:20cv5980-RV/MJF

______________________________________/

NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC HEARING

TAKE NOTICE a proceeding in this case has been scheduled for the place, date and time set forth below:

Place: Winston E Arnow Federal Building

100 North Palafox Street

Pensacola, Florida 32502

Location: Judge Vinson’s Chambers

Date: April 29, 2021

Time: 10:30 A.M.

Proceeding: BRIEF CONFERENCE

before the Honorable Roger Vinson, Senior United States District Judge

April 26, 2021

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS,

CLERK OF COURT

/s/ Sylvia Williams 

DATE: Deputy Clerk

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 3:20-cv-05980-MW-MJF Document 304 Filed 04/26/21 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ParticleDrilling Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jim B. Terry, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  JIM B. TERRY         |                   |   |   |
|---------------------------|------------------------|--------|--------|
| Jim  B. Terry             |                   |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |                   |   |
|                      |                   |   |
| Date:                     | February 7,  2008 |   |   |
|                           |                        |        |        |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc.and will be retained by Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
§ 765.161 Borrowers entering the Armed Forces. ( a ) *Protections for borrowers on active duty.* The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (Pub. L. 108-189) and the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 (Pub. L. 108-375) provide certain loan servicing protections for military borrowers. The Agency will apply those loan servicing protections to applicable Farm Loan borrowers. ( 1 ) The benefits and protections of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act apply to borrowers on active duty at all times.
( 2 ) The requirements of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 apply during a time of a war or national emergency as declared by the President or Congress.
( b ) *Eligibility for National Guard members and military reservists.* Borrowers who are National Guard members or military reservists will be eligible for the protections covered by this section, as specified in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section: ( 1 ) National Guard members must be on duty for at least 30 consecutive calendar days.
( 2 ) Military reservists are eligible from the date orders are received to report for active duty.
( c ) *Entity eligibility.* National Guard members and military reservists on active duty and any operating entity owned solely by the active duty borrower may be considered for protections specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
[86 FR 43392, Aug. 9, 2021
]
§ 764.155 Security requirements. An FO loan must be secured: ( a ) In accordance with §§ 764.103 through 764.106;
( b ) At a minimum, by the real estate being purchased or improved. ( 1 ) An ML made for FO purposes, may be secured only by the real estate being purchased or improved, as long as its value is at least 100 percent of the loan amount.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[72 FR 63298, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 81 FR 3293, Jan. 21, 2016]
#### § 652.34 Opportunity to contest decertification.

To contest decertification, the technical service provider must submit in writing to the Deputy Chief for Programs, within 20 calendar days from the date of receipt of the Notice of Proposed Decertification, the reasons why the Deputy Chief for Programs should not decertify, including any mitigating factors as well as any supporting documentation.

[79 FR 44640, Aug. 1, 2014]
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**RESTATED OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10–K of WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR12 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

 

Date:  As of March 15,2007

|   |   | /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann                                                                        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  ThomasG. Lehmann                                                                 |
|   |   | Title:   President and Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor |
----

|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |

|                |   | /s/ Allen      Salmasi           |   |
|---------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                |   | Allen      Salmasi               |   |
|                |   | Chief      Executive Officer and |   |
|                |   | President                        |   |
|                |   |                             |   |
| March      13, 2008 |   |                             |   |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL ANTHONY LAPAGLIA,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 158 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of August, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### § 58.37 Financial interest of licensees.

No licensee shall render service on any product in which he is financially interested.
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 47-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 47-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 2 of 2
DUPLICATE

Court Name: U S DISTRICT COURT - AL/t'1

Division: 2

Recei pt Number: 4602004634

Cashier ID. brobinso

Transaction Date' 04/08/2008

Payer Name BEASLEY ALLEN CROW METHVIN

NOTICE OF APPEAL/DOCKETING FEE

For: BEASLEY ALLEN CROW t4ETHVIN

Case/Part y : D-ALH-2-06--CV-00061 8-001

Amount' $455 00

CHECK

Check/Money Order Num: 186814

Amt Tendered' $455 00

Total Due. $455 00

Total Tendered, $455 00

Change Amt $000

APPEAL FILED ON 4/4/08

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 80 Filed 04/08/2008 Page 1 of 1
23.205 Energy-savings performance

contracts.

(a) Agencies should make maximum use of the authority provided in the National Energy

Conservation Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 8287) to use an energy-savings performance contract (ESPC),

when life-cycle cost-effective, to reduce energy use and cost in the agency’s facilities and operations.

(b)

(1) Under an ESPC, an agency can contract with an energy service company for a period not to

exceed 25 years to improve energy efficiency in one or more agency facilities at no direct capital

cost to the United States Treasury. The energy service company finances the capital costs of

implementing energy conservation measures and receives, in return, a contractually determined

share of the cost savings that result.

(2) Except as provided in 10 CFR436.34, ESPC’s are subject to subpart 17.1.

(c) To solicit and award an ESPC, the contracting officer-

(1) Must use the procedures, selection method, and terms and conditions provided in 10 CFR Part

436, Subpart B; and

(2) May use the "Qualified List" of energy service companies established by the Department of

Energy and other agencies.

(d) For more information see

https://energy.gov/eere/femp/energy-savings-performance-contracts-federal-agencies.

Parent topic: Subpart 23.2 - Energy and Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy