alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Matthew Bitter

Admin Docket No:

8:20-cv-89058-MCR-GRJ

Case No. 3:19md2885

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

NOTICE OF DESIGNATED FORUM

Plaintiff, Matthew Bitter, by and through counsel of record, files this Notice 

of Designated Forum, and would show the Court that venue would be proper in the 

United States District Court, Vermont District Court, absent direct filing on the 

administrative docket. Plaintiff reserves the right to amend this designation of 

proper venue and forum, once case specific fact and expert discovery is complete. 

Plaintiff therefore requests that the Court take notice of this designation of 

forum. 

Dated: May 14, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Caragh Fay Owens

Caragh Fay Owens (Appearing Pro Hac Vice)

Bar No.: MD-16955

6205 Executive Blvd.

North Bethesda, MD 20852

Telephone: 202-589-1300

caragh.fay@faylawgroup.com 

Case 8:20-cv-89058-MCR-GRJ Document 3 Filed 05/14/22 Page 1 of 3
2

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 8:20-cv-89058-MCR-GRJ Document 3 Filed 05/14/22 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that on this 14 day of May, 2022, a true and correct 

copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court and served 

using the CM/ECF system.

/s/ Caragh Fay Owens

Caragh Fay Owens (Appearing Pro Hac Vice)

Bar No.: MD-16955

6205 Executive Blvd.

North Bethesda, MD 20852

Telephone: 202-589-1300

caragh.fay@faylawgroup.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 8:20-cv-89058-MCR-GRJ Document 3 Filed 05/14/22 Page 3 of 3
# L_2014293EN.01005701.xml

| 9.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 293/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 293/57

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 1387/2013 of 17 December 2013 suspending the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain agricultural and industrial products and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1344/2011

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 354 of 28 December 2013
  )

On page 271, Annex I, columns ‘CN code’/‘TARIC’, entry ‘ex 3920 49 10’/‘30’, column ‘Description’:

for:

‘Film of a (polyvinyl)chloride-copolymer

| — | containing by weight 45 % or more of fillers |
| --- | --- |

—

containing by weight 45 % or more of fillers

| — | on a support (1)’ |
| --- | --- |

—

on a support (1)’

1

read:

‘Film of a (polyvinyl)chloride-copolymer

| — | containing by weight 45 % or more of fillers |
| --- | --- |

—

containing by weight 45 % or more of fillers

| — | on a support’ |
| --- | --- |

—

on a support’

On page 313, Annex I, columns ‘CN code’/‘TARIC’, entry ‘ex 9405 40 39’/‘10’, column ‘Description’:

for:

‘Ambient light module with a length of 300 mm or more but not more than 600 mm, based on a light engine of a series of 3 or more but not more than 9 specific one chip red green and blue light emitting diodes mounted on a PCB, with light coupled to the front and/or back of the flat TV set (1)’

read:

‘Ambient light module with a length of 300 mm or more but not more than 600 mm, based on a light engine of a series of 3 or more but not more than 9 specific one chip red green and blue light emitting diodes mounted on a PCB, with light coupled to the front and/or back of the flat TV set’

---
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 36-5 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 36-5 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 36-5 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 10.1


 


Exhibit 10.1 to
Hiland Partners, LP 1st Quarter 2009 10-Q


 


Compensation of Conflicts
Committee Members in Connection with Going Private Proposal


 


On
February 19, 2009, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Hiland Partners
GP, LLC, the general partner of Hiland Partners, LP  (the “Partnership”), authorized the Conflicts
Committee of the Board (the “Conflicts Committee”) to consider and respond to a
proposal made by Harold Hamm, whereby Mr. Hamm and certain of his
affiliates would acquire all of the outstanding common units of the Partnership
that are not owned by Mr. Hamm, his affiliates or the Hamm family trusts
(the “Proposal”).  The Conflicts
Committee is composed of two independent directors, John T. McNabb, II and
Shelby E. Odell. On February 19, 2009, the Board determined that, for
service on the Conflicts Committee in connection with the Conflicts Committee’s
consideration of the Proposal, all members of the Conflicts Committee will
receive a one-time fee of $30,000, in lieu of the prior arrangement of $1,000
per meeting. No additional fees are expected to be paid to the members of the
Conflicts Committee for attending meetings of the Conflicts Committee during
the time period in which the Conflicts Committee is considering the Proposal. The
fees payable to the members of the Conflicts Committee are in addition to the
annual fees received by such directors for their services as a member of the
Partnership’s Board and other committees thereof.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000392 04-JUN-2015 08:52 AM
52.242-13 Bankruptcy.       As prescribed in 42.903, insert the following clause:          Bankruptcy (July 1995)          In the event the contractor enters into proceedings relating to bankruptcy, whether voluntary or involuntary, the contractor agrees to furnish, by certified mail or electronic commerce method authorized by the contract, written notification of the bankruptcy to the contracting officer responsible for administering the contract. This notification shall be furnished within fivedays of the initiation of the proceedings relating to bankruptcy filing. This notification shall include the date on which the bankruptcy petition was filed, the identity of the court in which the bankruptcy petition was filed, and a listing of government contract numbers and contracting offices for all government contracts against which final payment has not been made. This obligation remains in effect until final payment under this contract.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.242 [Reserved]
# 52.224 [Reserved]

- 52.224-1 Privacy Act Notification. 
- 52.224-2 Privacy Act. 
- 52.224-3 Privacy Training. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darryl Deron Ponder, Appellant.

Appeals by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence and two amended sentences of the County Court, Suffolk County, all imposed March 29, 1978. Sentence affirmed. No opinion. Appeals from the amended sentences dismissed. The maximum terms of the amended sentences have expired. Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### § 714.40 Time of filing.

Claim shall be filed within 2 years after the date payment was made to the Secretary. The date payment was made shall be deemed to be the date such payment was deposited in the general fund of the Treasury as shown on the certificate of deposit on which such payment was scheduled.
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-60 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04

- 23

- 00059

- CR IN RE Miguel Angel GOMEZ - GARCIA Original Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Irene Rios , Justice Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice Delivered and Filed: March 29, 2023 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On January 17, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed an emergency motion to stay the underly ing proceedings pending disposition of the petition for writ of mandamus, which this court granted in part on January 17, 2023. For mandamus relief in a criminal case, a r elator has the burden to show the trial court violated a ministerial duty and there is no adequate remedy at law. See State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Jud

. Dist. Ct. of Apps

. at Texarkana , 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). A trial court has a ministerial duty to rule on a properly filed and timely presented motion

. See id. However, a relator has the burden of providing this court with a sufficient record. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.7(a)(1). A relator must provide the court of appeals with a record showing

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 12813CR , styled State of Texas v. Miguel Angel Gomez

- Garcia , pending in the County Court , Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth presiding.04

- 23

- 00059

- CR

- 2

- the motion at issue was properly filed, the trial court was made aware of the motion, and the motion has not been ruled on by the trial court for an unreasonable time period. See In re Mendoza , 131 S.W.3d 167, 167

– 68 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2004, orig. proc eeding); Barnes v. State , 832 S.W.2d 424, 426

– 27 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). Here, the record contains a copy of relator’s motion. However, the copy of relator’s motion is not file

- stamped and this record does not establish that the trial court was aware of relator’s motion or that the trial court has failed to rule for an unreasonable period of time. See i d. B ased on the record before us , relator has not satisfied his mandamus burden

. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandam us is denied. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a). The stay imposed on January 17, 2023 is lifted. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH
July 1, 2015

Mr. Joshua Williams

Fourpoint Media LLC

1945 SE Water Avenue

Portland, OR 97214

Dear Mr. Williams :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your [date], exemption request on behalf of Fourpoint Media into the public

docket (No. FAA

- 2015

- 1213 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The

information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:.

 The reasons why granting th e request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we d o not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 1 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 2 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 3 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 4 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 5 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 6 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 7 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 8 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 9 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 10 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 11 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 12 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 13 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 14 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 15 of 16
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 16 of 16
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 20, 2015

NO. 03-13-00704-CV

Karen Kuester, Appellant

v.

Ivor Green, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment rendered by the trial court on June 13, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Appellant 

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
52.225-14 Inconsistency between English Version and Translation of Contract.       As prescribed at 25.1103(b), insert the following clause:          Inconsistency Between English Version and Translation of Contract (Feb 2000)          In the event of inconsistency between any terms of this contract and any translation into another language, the English language meaning shall control.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.225 [Reserved]
29.402 Foreign contracts.

29.402-1 Foreign fixed-price contracts.

29.402-2 Foreign cost-reimbursement contracts.

29.402-3 Tax on certain foreign procurements.

29.402-4 Taxes—Foreign Contracts in Afghanistan.

Parent topic: Subpart 29.4 - Contract Clauses
Unassociated Document


    
      


      Exhibit
10.1

      Unofficial
Summary Translation

      


      Hongrui
Pharmaceutical Factory Supplemental Assets Transfer Agreement

      


      Laiyang
Jiangbo Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Shandong Traditional Chinese Medicine College
and the Traditional Chinese Medicine College of Shandong Hongrui pharmaceutical
manufactory signed an assets transfer agreement on January 23, 2009, and the
handover was scheduled on February 5, 2009. The Hongrui assets transfer was
carried out on February 5, 2009 by three parties herein. Due to the significant
differences between the actual transferred inventories from Hongrui, including
raw materials, low value consumption goods, packaging, production and
semi-finished product, and the records listed in the assets appraisal report
issued by Yantai Huada Co. Accounting Firm on August 31, 2009, the parties
negotiated and amended the initial transfer contract as follows:

      


      
        
          	
                  A. 

                	
                   Article
      VII of the original contract is amended
as:

                


        

      

      The three
parties agree the transfer value of party B’s tangible assets and 22 drug
approval numbers is RMB 102.6 million in total.

      


      
        
          	
                  B. 

                	
                   Article
      VIII of the original contract is amended
as:

                


        

      

      Within one month of the approval and
consent from the state-owned assets administration department and the completion
of assets handover, Party C shall pay Party A RMB 20 million in one lump sum
cash payment, another RMB 38.6 million shall be
paid after the drug approval numbers are transferred to party C. Party C should
be responsible to pay the remaining of RMB 44 million by newly issued shares of Genesis pharmaceuticals
Enterprises, Inc, USD $10 per share using the exchange rate of 6.836,
totaling 643,651 shares. Shares shall be paid within one year of the signing of
the agreement to Party A or entities or individuals designated by Party
A.

      


      There are
no changes to the remaining provisions of the contract.

      


      This
agreement has three copies, one for each of the three parties.

      


      Party A: Shandong Traditional
Chinese Medicine College (Seal)

      Legal
Representative:

      Date:
February 10, 2009

      


      Party B: The Traditional
Chinese Medicine College of Shandong Hongrui Pharmaceutical Factory
(Seal)

      Legal
Representative:

      Date:
February 10, 2009

      


      Party C: Laiyang Jiangbo
Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.(Seal)

      Legal
Representative:

       Date:
February 10, 2009
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U. S. C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This certification is intended to
accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Berkshire Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  The undersigned, in my
capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies to the best of my knowledge
that:





(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





June 18,
2010





/s/ Steven RosenbergSteven
      Rosenberg,Chief
      Executive Officer, Presidentand
      Chief Financial Officer
# L_2014212EN.01001501.xml

| 18.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 212/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 212/15

---

COUNCIL DECISION

taken by common accord with the President of the Commission,

of 17 July 2014

appointing a Member of the European Commission

(2014/468/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 246 thereof,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | On 9 February 2010, the European Council adopted Decision 2010/80/EU (2) appointing the European Commission for the period until 31 October 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 9 February 2010, the European Council adopted Decision 2010/80/EU (2) appointing the European Commission for the period until 31 October 2014.

| (2) | In a letter dated 18 June 2014, Mr José Manuel DURÃO BARROSO, President of the Commission, informed the Council that Mr Olli REHN had resigned from his post as a Member of the Commission with effect from 30 June 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In a letter dated 18 June 2014, Mr José Manuel DURÃO BARROSO, President of the Commission, informed the Council that Mr Olli REHN had resigned from his post as a Member of the Commission with effect from 30 June 2014.

| (3) | In accordance with the second paragraph of Article 246 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, a vacancy caused by resignation is to be filled for the remainder of the Member's term of office by a new Member of the same nationality. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with the second paragraph of Article 246 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, a vacancy caused by resignation is to be filled for the remainder of the Member's term of office by a new Member of the same nationality.

| (4) | A new Member of the Commission should therefore be appointed, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

A new Member of the Commission should therefore be appointed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

By common accord with Mr José Manuel DURÃO BARROSO, President of the Commission, the Council appoints Mr Jyrki KATAINEN as Member of the Commission for the remainder of the term of office which runs until 31 October 2014.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 17 July 2014.

For the Council

The President

S. GOZI

---

(1)  Opinion of 16 July 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 38, 11.2.2010, p. 7.

2

---