alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 56.3 Administration.

The Administrator shall perform, for and under the supervision of the Secretary, such duties as the Secretary may require in the enforcement or administration of the provisions of the Act and the regulations in this part. The Administrator is authorized to waive for limited periods any particular provisions of the regulations in this part to permit experimentation so that new procedures, equipment, and processing techniques may be tested to facilitate definite improvements and at the same time to determine full compliance with the spirit and intent of the regulations in this part. The AMS and its officers and employees shall not be liable in damages through acts of commission or omission in the administration of this part.

[20 FR 670, Feb. 1, 1955, as amended at 38 FR 26798, Sept. 26, 1973; 42 FR 2970, Jan. 14, 1977. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 60 FR 12402, Mar. 7, 1995; 71 FR 42007, July 24, 2006]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2867 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Flutolanil. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Flutolanil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLUTOLANIL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.82 N-[3-(1- 

Methylethoxy)phenyl]-2- 

(trifluoromethyl)benzamide 

(Flutolanil) (CAS No. 

66332–96–5) (provided for 

in subheading 2924.29.47) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2867 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
h

h

E

FW

R

Visitor Center

Twin

Barns

Puget Sound

 ̈§¦5

Nisqual yl R vi er

McAllister Creek

h

Nisqually River

E

Trail Seasonally Closed

h

h

E

FW

R

Visitor Center

Twin

Barns

Puget Sound

 ̈§¦5

Nisqual yl R vi er

McAllister Creek

h

Nisqually River

E

Trail Seasonally Closed

Alternative D: Refuge Expansion of 3,479 Acres 

and Maximum Estuarine Restoration

Figure 2.3-4

Source: USFWS, 2000; Ducks Unlimited, 1999; EDAW, 2002

Chapter 2 Alternatives

Nisqually NWR Draft CCP/EIS

2-21

P:\0e01401 Nisqually\GIS\mxd\Figure2.3-4.mxd

N

0 0.5 1 0.25 Miles

1:40,000

Legend

RNA Boundary

Public Recreation Trail

Hunting Areas

Nisqually NWR

Current Ownership within Boundary

Riparian Restoration

Estuarine Restoration

Freshwater Wetland Enhancements

 R

 E

FW

Nisqually Tribe

Private

WDFW

USFWS

Expansion Area

Area Removed from RNA Designation

Approved Nisqually NWR Boundary

Dike Changes

Existing

Removed

New External

New Internal

Berm

WDFW

h Accessible Fishing Access

h Bank Fishing Access
§ 764.205 Security requirements. A Down payment loan must: ( a ) Be secured in accordance with §§ 764.103 through 764.106;
( b ) Be secured by a lien on the property being acquired with the loan funds and junior only to the party financing the balance of the purchase price.
[72 FR 63298, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 74345, Dec. 8, 2008; 86 FR 43392, Aug. 9, 2021]
# 22.1002-2 Wage determinations based on prevailing rates.

*Contractors* performing on *service contracts* in excess of $2,500 to which no predecessor *contractor*’s collective bargaining agreement applies *shall* pay their employees at least the wages and fringe benefits found by the Department of Labor to prevail in the locality or, in the absence of a *wage determination*, the minimum wage set forth in the Fair Labor Standards Act.

**Parent topic:**22.1002 Statutory and Executive order requirements.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2968 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain AC electric motors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. ALEXANDER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain AC electric 

motors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN AC ELECTRIC MOTORS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.03 AC electric motors of an output exceeding 37.5 W but not exceeding 105 W, 

single phase, each equipped with a capacitor and a speed control mechanism (provided for in subheading 8501.40.40) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2968 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ROBERT L. DENT,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-310-TKW-MJF

BAY COUNTY SHERIFF ORG, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 27). No objections were filed.

The magistrate judge dutifully analyzed the claims that Plaintiff appeared to 

be asserting in the operative third amended complaint and then properly concluded 

that none of those claims state a plausible claim for relief. This was no small task 

because the statement of facts in the third amended complaint begins with the 

delusional claim that Plaintiff has “a microchip in [his] skin at which give a signal 

to organization member who are committing a crime against [him]” and ends with 

an equally delusional claim that someone “tried to kill [him] ... with a rattlesnake in 

a laundry bag.” 

These claims are patently frivolous, as is the relief requested by Plaintiff: “I 

want this microchip removed for federal charges and I seek 45 million dollars for 

Case 5:20-cv-00310-TKW-MJF Document 28 Filed 02/28/22 Page 1 of 2
nearly taking my life for ranso[m] money and excessive force being used.” Thus, 

while the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that the third 

amended complaint is due to be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §§1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 

1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim, the Court also finds that it is due to be 

dismissed under §1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as frivolous. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order; this case is DISMISSED under 

28 U.S.C. §§1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) and 1915A(b)(1); and the Clerk shall close the 

case file

DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of February, 2022.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00310-TKW-MJF Document 28 Filed 02/28/22 Page 2 of 2
#### Vivian M. Dean et al., Appellants, v. Hotel St. Moritz, Inc. et al., as Trustees of Pension Funds, Respondents.

Order entered August 23, 1966, providing for pretrial depositions of the parties, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of providing that defendants be examined first, that at said examination the defendants are to produce the documents specified in the notice of examination, that the examination of plaintiffs be held, at defendants’ option in New York no less than 20 days before the trial or in California by written interrogatories or open commission, and if by open commission that the parties respectively pay their expenses to be taxed as costs by the prevailing parties, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Priority of examination is not contested by defendants. Plaintiffs initially served their notice of examination and are therefore entitled to priority. Absent special circumstances the party to be examined may not be burdened with the expense of the party seeking it, (See *Piel*v. *Lilly & Co.,*19 A D 2d 810; *Fitzgerald*v. *Fitzgerald,*262 App. Div. 708.) Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Steuer and Witmer, JJ.
# 52.253 [Reserved]

- 52.253-1 Computer Generated Forms. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
49.102 Notice of termination.

(a) General. The contracting officer shall terminate contracts for convenience or default only by a

written notice to the contractor (see 49.601). The notice of termination may be expedited by means

of electronic communication capable of providing confirmation of receipt by the contractor. When

the notice is mailed, it shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. When the contracting

office arranges for hand delivery of the notice, a written acknowledgment shall be obtained from the

contractor. The notice shall state-

(1) That the contract is being terminated for the convenience of the Government (or for default)

under the contract clause authorizing the termination;

(2) The effective date of termination;

(3) The extent of termination;

(4) Any special instructions; and

(5) The steps the contractor should take to minimize the impact on personnel if the termination,

together with all other outstanding terminations, will result in a significant reduction in the

contractor’s work force (see paragraph (g) of the notice in 49.601-2). If the termination notice is by

telegram, include these "steps" in the confirming letter or modification.

(b) Distribution of copies. The contracting officer shall simultaneously send the termination notice to

the contractor, and a copy to the contract administration office and to any known assignee,

guarantor, or surety of the contractor.

(c) Amendment of termination notice. The contracting officer may amend a termination notice to-

(1) Correct nonsubstantive mistakes in the notice;

(2) Add supplemental data or instructions; or

(3) Rescind the notice if it is determined that items terminated had been completed or shipped

before the contractor’s receipt of the notice.

(d) Reinstatement of terminated contracts. Upon written consent of the contractor, the contracting

office may reinstate the terminated portion of a contract in whole or in part by amending the notice

of termination if it has been determined in writing that-

(1) Circumstances clearly indicate a requirement for the terminated items; and

(2) Reinstatement is advantageous to the Government.

Parent topic: Subpart 49.1 - General Principles
EXHIBIT
13.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Manny Dhinsa, Director, Chairman, President, Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary of Power Oil & Gas Inc.,
(the “Company”), certify, under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form
20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and information contained in that Form 20-F fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations
of the Company.





Dated:
June 29, 2010








By:
            /s/ Manny DhinsaName:
            Manny
      DhinsaTitle:
            Director,
      Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and
      Secretary(Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial
  Officer)








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2891 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Azoxystrobin Technical. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 

Azoxystrobin Technical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AZOXYSTROBIN TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.06 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Azoxystrobin Technical) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 2891 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
#### § 62.201 Availability of service.

Services under this part are available to applicants, including international and domestic government agencies, private agricultural businesses, and any financially interested person.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00130

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF T.B., A C HILD §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 231st District Court

of Tarrant County ( 231

- 700012

- 21 )

Oc tober 6, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

S ECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Brian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
Exhibit 34.1
                                                                    ------------



             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Management Committee
BMW Financial Services NA, LLC

We have examined BMW Financial Services NA, LLC's (the Company) compliance with
the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for Asset Backed Notes, BMW Vehicle Owner Trust
2006-A (except for the servicing criteria described in the following paragraph),
which the Company has determined as being applicable to the activities it
performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions being serviced
as of December 31, 2007 and for the period from January 1, 2007 to December 31,
2007. Management is responsible for BMW Financial Services NA, LLC's compliance
with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
BMW Financial Services NA, LLC's compliance based on our examination.

The Company has determined that the servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii),
1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(iii),
1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x) (A)-(C), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), and
1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities it
performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions being serviced
as of December 31, 2007 and for the period from January 1, 2007 to December 31,
2007.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified in the first paragraph of this report and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, BMW Financial Services NA, LLC complied, in all material
respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of December 31, 2007 and
for the period from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007.

/s/ J.H. Cohn LLP

Roseland, New Jersey
March 14, 2008
52.241-10 Termination Liability.

As prescribed in 41.501(d)(4), insert a clause substantially the same as the following:

Termination Liability (Feb 1995)

(a) If the Government discontinues utility service under this contract before completion of the

facilities cost recovery period specified in paragraph (b) of this clause, in consideration of the

Contractor furnishing and installing at its expense, the new facility described herein, the

Government shall pay termination charges, calculated as set forth in this clause.

(b) Facility cost recovery period. The period of time, not exceeding the term of this contract, during

which the net cost of the new facility shall be recovered by the Contractor is ______ months.[Insert

negotiated duration.]

(c) Net facility cost. The cost of the new facility, less the agreed upon salvage value of such facility,

is $_______. [Insert appropriate dollar amount.]

(d) Monthly facility cost recovery rate. The monthly facility cost recovery rate which the Government

shall pay the Contractor whether or not service is received is $_____.[Divide the net facility cost in

paragraph (c) of this clause by the facility’s cost recovery period in paragraph (b) of this clause and

insert the resultant figure.]

(e) Termination charges. Termination charges = $____.[Multiply the remaining months of the

facility's cost recovery period specified in paragraph (b) of this clause by the monthly facility cost

recovery rate in paragraph (d) of this clause and insert the resultant figure.]

(f) If the Contractor has recovered its capital costs at the time of termination there will be no

termination liability charge.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.241 Utility Services Provisions and Clauses.
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5918/MCR/EMT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

GERNARD DONEZ CHESTNUT,

FDOC Inmate No. 130146,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5918/MCR/EMT

LIEUTENANT J. NEEL, et al.,

Defendants.

/

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on March 

3, 2021. ECF No. 18. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.
Page 2 of 2 

Case No. 3:20cv5918/MCR/EMT

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No.

18, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this

Order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of April 2021.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
47.207-9 Annotation and distribution of shipping and billing documents.       (a) 						            The contracting officer shall state in detail the responsibilities of the contractor, the contracting agency, and, if appropriate, the consignee for the annotation and distribution of shipping and billing documents. See 41 CFR part 102-118, Transportation Payment and Audit.                                          (b) 						            In instances of mass movements of freight made available to the contractor at one time, it is particularly important that the contracting officer specifies that bills of lading be cross-referenced so that the Government benefits from applicable volume rates.                                          (c) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-28, Contractor’s Invoices, in drayage or other term contracts.    **Parent topic:** 47.207 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and special requirements.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 259 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 259

To require that Federal forfeiture funds be used, in part, to clean up 
                     methamphetamine laboratories.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 2005

Mr. Johnson (for himself and Mr. Thomas) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require that Federal forfeiture funds be used, in part, to clean up 
                     methamphetamine laboratories.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Emergency Meth Lab Cleanup 
Funding Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING FROM TREASURY FORFEITURE FUND.

    Chapter 97 of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating section 9703 (as added by Public Law 
        103-62) as section 9703A;
            (2) by moving section 9703 (as added by Public Law 102-393) 
        so as to appear after section 9702; and
            (3) in section 9703(a)(1), by adding at the end the 
        following:
                    ``(K)(i) Payment to the designated State, local, or 
                tribal law enforcement, environmental, or health entity 
                for experts and consultants needed to clean up any area 
                formerly used as a methamphetamine laboratory.
                    ``(ii) If a methamphetamine laboratory is located 
                on private property, not more than 90 percent of the 
                costs may be paid only if--
                            ``(I) the property owner did not have 
                        knowledge of the existence or operation of such 
                        laboratory before the law enforcement action to 
                        close it; or
                            ``(II) the property owner notifies law 
                        enforcement not later than 24 hours after 
                        discovering the existence of such 
                        laboratory.''.
                                 <all>
```