alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SERVED: April 27, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENTOF**TRANSPORTATION~15** OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF ARMAN GRIGORIAN DOCKETNO. FAA**2014~** 

### 1120 (Civil Penalty Action)
ORDERTO SHOW CAUSE - .J l/ '' -= 1. ,'"' • -=-.. . . - .""'\

.._ •-- I - • -• '' ,•_,' •

The Federal Avia.tion Administration (hereinafter "FAA") filed a Complaint dated January 

### 24, 2015. Arman Grigorian, (hereinafter "Grigorian") filed a Request fo.r Hearingdated December

### 22, 2014. The FAA avers Grigorian was served with the Complainton January 

### 14, 2015 at his address ofrecord. The FAA further avers that on February 

### 27. 2015, Grigorian was seryed with an Amended Complaint. We served our Procedural Orderon February 19, 

### 2015. On AprilS, 

### 2015, the FAA filed

# aMotion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Grigorian has failed to file an Answerto the Complaintor Amended Complaint. failed to file a response to our Procedural Order and failed to respond to the Agency's Motion forJudgment on the Pleadings; WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: I. On or before May 8, 

### 2015, Grigorian shall file a response to this Order

. stating whythe reliefrequested in the FAA's Motion should not be granted; and 

### 2. On orbefore May 8, 

### 2015, Grigorian shall answer the Complaint; and 3. On orbefore May 8, 

### 2015, Grigorian shall fully comply with our Procedural**Orde~;** and 4. Absent full and complete responses to paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 hereinabove. Grigorian may be sanctioned including, but not limited to, allegations in the Complaint may be deemed admitted; and/orGrigorian may be precluded from introducing any

### 2 evidence at the hearing otherthan his own testimony; and/or Grigorian's Request for Hearing may be dismissed; and/ora Default Judgment may be entered against Grigorian in the full amount ofthe fine requested by the Agency in its Complaint.



### o.;p --1-- 1 /r..:. \ 

# "'L::rla;r;('f(;;**~** lV Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment- Service List



### 2

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY ·Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WI000 1

Arman Grigorian, 

### Respondent 3126 Chadney Drive
. Glendale, CA 91026 TEL: 818-636-8844 

### ONE COPY

Zachary M. Berman, 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofRegional Counsel, Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration I Aviation Plaza Jamaic;:t, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699 The Honorable Richard 

### C. Goodwin,

### Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-1120 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal ·Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WIOOO, Washington. DC 20591; Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1791

BILLY GRISSO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-98-

1061-AMD)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: September 8, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy Grisso, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Billy Grisso appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

mandamus petition which sought to compel the Defendant to render a

decision on his application for benefits filed under 42 U.S.C.

§ 402(x)(1) (1988) (current version at 42 U.S.C.A. § 402(x)(1)

(West Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Grisso v. Apfel, No.

CA-98-1061-AMD (D. Md. Apr. 20, 1998). We also deny Grisso’s motion

to remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
27.202-5 Solicitation provisions and contract

clause.

(a)

(1) Insert a solicitation provision substantially the same as the provision at 52.227-6, Royalty

Information, in-

(i) Any solicitation that may result in a negotiated contract for which royalty information is desired

and for which certified cost or pricing data are obtained under 15.403; or

(ii) Sealed bid solicitations only if the need for such information is approved at a level above the

contracting officer as being necessary for proper protection of the Government’s interests.

(2) If the solicitation is for communication services and facilities by a common carrier, use the

provision with its Alternate I.

(b) If the Government is obligated to pay a royalty on a patent involved in the prospective contract,

insert in the solicitation a provision substantially the same as the provision at 52.227-7, PatentsNotice of Government Licensee. If the clause at 52.227-6 is not included in the solicitation, the

contracting officer may require offerors to provide information sufficient to provide this notice to the

other offerors.

(c) Insert the clause at 52.227-9, Refund of Royalties, in negotiated fixed-price solicitations and

contracts when royalties may be paid under the contract. If a fixed-price incentive contract is

contemplated, change "price" to "target cost and target profit" wherever it appears in the clause.

The clause may be used in cost-reimbursement contracts where agency approval of royalties is

necessary to protect the Government’s interests.

Parent topic: 27.202 Royalties.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. CASE NO. 3:20cr40-4/MCR

DONALD BLACK

______________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of the 

Defendant, DONALD BLACK, to Count One of the Indictment is hereby 

ACCEPTED. All parties must appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of June 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00040-MCR Document 345 Filed 06/09/21 Page 1 of 1
#### Stephen Tunstall, Respondent, *v.*Walter W. Winton, Appellant.

(Argued June 17, 1884;

decided June 24, 1884.)

*B. F. Sawyer*for appellant.

*Edward P. Wilder*for respondent. ■

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.
| 1.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Susanna Hilario                                                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Susanna Hilario                                                      |
| Title: | Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
| Date:  | September 16, 2009                                                   |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board

In connection with its investigation into the April 20, 2010, explosion and fire that occurred on the BP/Transocean Deepwater Horizon oil rig, the United States Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) announces that it will be holding an all day symposium entitled “International Models of Offshore Oil Rig Regulation” on Wednesday, December 15, 2010 in Washington, DC. The meeting will bring together international regulators, union representatives and industry groups' to discuss regulation of offshore drilling operations in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon accident.

The meeting will be held from 9 a.m.-5 p.m. at the Embassy Suites Ballroom located at 1250 22nd Street Northwest in Washington, DC. The meeting is free and open to the public.

The CSB's Board Members and BP Deepwater Horizon investigation team will hear testimony from leading safety experts involved in offshore drilling activities from countries including the United Kingdom, Australia and Norway. CSB Board Members and panel participants will be available to answer questions during a public comment period. The meeting will be available via webcast. All proceedings will be videotaped and an official transcript will be published.

                    The CSB is an independent Federal agency charged with investigating industrial chemical accidents. The agency's board members are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. CSB investigations look into all aspects of chemical accidents, including physical causes such as equipment failure as well as inadequacies in                           ( print page 75663)                        regulations, industry standards, and safety management systems.                

Christopher W. Warner,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2010-30672 Filed 12-2-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6350-01-P
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 11 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 11 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 11 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 11 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 11 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 11 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 6 of 6
§ 510.4 Multitrack processing. ( a ) When ARS has a significant number of requests, the nature of which precludes a determination within 20 working days, the requests may be processed in a multitrack processing system, based on the date of receipt, the amount of work and time involved in processing the request, and whether the request qualifies for expedited processing.
( b ) ARS may establish as many processing tracks as appropriate; processing within each track shall be based on a first-in, first-out concept, and rank-ordered by the date of receipt of the request.
( c ) A requester whose request does not qualify for the fastest track may be given an opportunity to limit the scope of the request in order to qualify for the fastest track. This multitrack processing system does not lessen agency responsibility to exercise due diligence in processing requests in the most expeditious manner possible.
( d ) ARS shall process requests in each track on a “first-in, first-out” basis, unless there are unusual circumstances as set forth in § 1.16 of this title, or the requester is entitled to expedited processing as set forth in § 1.9 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                       4,212,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,020,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   427,000
<INVENTORY>                                 29,438,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,926,000
<PP&E>                                      23,249,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,107,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,703,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,755,000
<BONDS>                                      7,884,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,994,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,170,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,703,000
<SALES>                                     34,681,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,681,000
<CGS>                                       23,808,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,698,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               940,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             943,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                853,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   311,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            542,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   542,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14


</TABLE>
*Appellee Joseph Scibana notified this court that he was never served with

process in the district court and would not be filing a brief or otherwise

participating in this appeal. After an examination of the appellant’s brief and the

record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus the appeal is

submitted on the appellant’s brief and the record. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted September 28, 2005*

Decided September 28, 2005

Before

Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 05-2344

LARRY STOCKS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

JOSEPH SCIBANA,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Western District

of Wisconsin

No. 05-C-136-C

Barbara B. Crabb, 

Chief Judge.

ORDER

We AFFIRM the judgment for substantially the reasons stated by the district

court in its thorough orders of April 6, 2005 and April 25, 2005.

UNPUBLISHED ORDER

Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Video Display Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal controls
over financial reporting.
 Date: January 14, 2008
    /s/ Ronald D. OrdwayRonald D. OrdwayChief Executive Officer
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 25 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 25 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 25 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 3 of 3
# L_2014065EN.01000801.xml

| 5.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 65/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 65/8

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 204/2014

of 20 February 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Aceituna de Mallorca/Aceituna Mallorquina/Oliva de Mallorca/Oliva Mallorquina (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Aceituna de Mallorca’/‘Aceituna Mallorquina’/‘Oliva de Mallorca’/‘Oliva Mallorquina’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Aceituna de Mallorca’/‘Aceituna Mallorquina’/‘Oliva de Mallorca’/‘Oliva Mallorquina’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Aceituna de Mallorca’/‘Aceituna Mallorquina’/‘Oliva de Mallorca’/‘Oliva Mallorquina’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Aceituna de Mallorca’/‘Aceituna Mallorquina’/‘Oliva de Mallorca’/‘Oliva Mallorquina’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 February 2014.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 276, 25.9.2013, p. 17.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

SPAIN

Aceituna de Mallorca/Aceituna Mallorquina/Oliva de Mallorca/Oliva Mallorquina (PDO)

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 243 (Monday, December 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 78717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32418]

[[Page 78717]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7731]

In the Matter of the Designation of Saleh al-Qarawi also known as 
Saleh Al Qarawi also known as Saleh Abudullah Saleh Al Qarawi also 
known as Saleh bin Abdullah al-Qarawi also known as Akhuk al Saghir 
also known as Fawakeh also known as Mootasem also known as Abu Yahya Al 
Qarawi also known as Najm Al-Kheir as a Specially Designated Global 
Terrorist pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Saleh al-Qarawi, 
also known as Najm, also known as Saleh Al Qarawi, also known as Saleh 
Abudullah Saleh Al Qarawi, also known as Saleh bin Abdullah al-Qarawi, 
also known as Akhuk al Saghir, also known as Fawakeh, also known as 
Mootasem, also known as Abu Yahya Al Qarawi, also known as Najm Al-
Kheir committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of 
terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national 
security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in Section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated:
    December 13, 2011.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-32418 Filed 12-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Case 1:20-mj-00101-GRJ Document 1 Filed 12/02/20 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:20-mj-00101-GRJ Document 1 Filed 12/02/20 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:20-mj-00101-GRJ Document 1 Filed 12/02/20 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:20-mj-00101-GRJ Document 1 Filed 12/02/20 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:20-mj-00101-GRJ Document 1 Filed 12/02/20 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:20-mj-00101-GRJ Document 1 Filed 12/02/20 Page 6 of 6