alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
217.7801 Prohibition.

In accordance with section 814 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Pub.

L. 114-328) as amended by section 882 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year

2018 (Pub. L. 115-91), contracting officers shall not use reverse auctions when procuring items

designated by the requiring activity as personal protective equipment or an aviation critical safety

item, when the requiring activity advises the contracting officer that the level of quality or failure of

the equipment or item could result in combat casualties. See 252.209-7010 for the definition and

identification of critical safety items.

Parent topic: Subpart 217.78 - REVERSE AUCTIONS
### SERVE D AUGUS T 5,201 0 ' mC^T--;S?OMIO N

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH E MATTE RO F SAMUE LJOSEP H LATHA M FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10WP000 9 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S NO . FAA-2010-062 4 NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofore designateda s Cas e No . 2010WP150016 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r persons o n th e attache dServic e List .

i e A . Yode n Chie f Administrativ e L^rJudg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP10WP0009 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Samue l Josep hLatham , Responden t 3369 0 Almon dSt . Wildomar , C A 9259 5 TEL : 951-392-489 7 Lierr e Green , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacifi c Region , AWP- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-711 7 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was by U.S . Mail . Fo r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Hearin g Docket, Federa

l Aviation Administration , 600 Independence Avenue , S . W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building - Roo

m 2014 , Washington , DC 20591 , Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

Civil Hearing Minutes

Honorable Hope T. Cannon, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case Style: IN RE: Skanska USA Civil Southeast Inc and Skanska USA Inc 

Case No.: 3:20-cv-5980/LAC-HTC

Date: July 28, 2021

Hearing: Discovery Status Conference

__________________________________________________________________

Time Commenced: 10:00 a.m. 

Time Concluded: 11:38 a.m. 

Court Reporter: David Deik, Phipps Court Reporting

Attorneys present for Petitioners:

Jeremy Branning

Elizabeth Billhimer

Attorneys present for Claimants:

Brian Barr

Sam Geisler

Tom Gonzalez

Jeff Gill

Nicole Guntner

Stephen Echsner

Participating telephonically:

Hal Watson, Esquire, Skanska

Charles Blanchard, Esquire, Skanska

Robert Kelly, AUSA

Robb Hyde, AUSA

PROCEEDINGS:

10:00 a.m. Roll call of Teleconference participants.

Court in session.

Status conference on matters relating to discovery.

11:38 a.m. Court adjourned.

___________________________

Filed in Open Court/DCR

July 21, 2021

Deputy Clerk: Keri Igney

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1222 Filed 07/28/21 Page 1 of 1
```

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Citibank, N.A.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix
I, that Citibank, N.A. (or "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation
AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-
backed securities, automobile loan or lease-backed securities and student
loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the
Company provides the following servicing functions:  paying agent, securities
administration and trustee; or securities administration and paying agent;
or paying agent and trustee; or paying agent, collectively "Servicing
Functions." (the "Platform"), excluding servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i),
1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)
(ii) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) through 1122(d)(4)(xiv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with
respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31,
2006.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing
of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities
that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing
activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company
processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities
in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were
limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the
Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not
designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or
subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve month ended
December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

                                         /s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2007
```
#### § 58.40 Fees for appeal inspection or grading.

The fees to be charged for any appeal inspection or grading shall be double the fees specified on the inspection or grading certificate from which the appeal is taken: *Provided,* That the fee for any appeal grading requested by any agency of the U.S. Government shall be the same as set forth in the certificate from which the appeal is taken. If the result of any appeal inspection or grading discloses that a material error was made in the inspection or grading appealed from, no fee shall be required.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

February 20, 2007

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: David Finney v. Nissan North America, Inc., et al.

Case Number: #3:06-cv-00622-WKW

Referenced Pleading: Notice of Service of Subpoena

Docket Entry Number: #47

The referenced pleading was electronically filed on 2/19/2007 in this case and is not in

compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******This pleading is discovery and is not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 NON-FILING

OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleading is hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to disregard

the entry of this pleading on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the striking of

this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 48 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS2692 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
§ 61.102 Determination of quantity index. The quantity index of cottonseed shall be determined as follows: ( a ) For upland cottonseed the quantity index shall equal four times percentage of oil plus six times percentage of ammonia, plus 5.
( b ) For American Pima cottonseed the quantity index shall equal four times percentage of oil, plus six times percentage of ammonia, minus 10.
[37 FR 20157, Sept. 27, 1972]
**EXHIBIT 33.7**

**ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA**

The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.(collectively, the “**Company**”) provides this platform-level assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company’s acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d)(1)(ii), (iii), (iv), (4)(iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

•  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

•  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

•  As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to the Company’s foregoing assessment of compliance.

| The Bank of New York | The Bank of New York |
|----------------------|----------------------|

| The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. | The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Robert L. Griffin | /s/ Patrick J. Tadie |
|-----------------------|----------------------|

| Robert L. Griffin | Patrick J. Tadie |
|-------------------|------------------|

| Authorized Signer | Authorized Signer |
|-------------------|-------------------|

March 1, 2007
#### § 795.11 Husband and wife.

With respect to the 1988 crop year, a husband and wife shall be considered to be one person except that such individuals who, prior to their marriage, were separately engaged in unrelated farming operations will be determined to be separate persons with respect to such farming operations so long as the operations remain separate and distinct from any farming operation conducted by the other spouse if such individuals have executed a Contract to Participate in the 1988 Price Support and Production Adjustment Programs by April 15, 1988. Such individuals must file a form FSA-561 with the county committee for each such farming operation by July 8, 1988, if they desire to be considered as separate persons under this section.

[53 FR 21410, June 8, 1988]
#### § 70.92 Disposition.

The original and a copy of each grading certificate, issued pursuant to §§ 70.90 through 70.93, and not to exceed two additional copies thereof if requested by the applicant prior to issuance shall, immediately upon issuance, be delivered or mailed to the applicant or the applicant's designee. Other copies shall be filed and retained in accordance with the disposition schedule for grading program records.

[71 FR 42014, July 24, 2006]
# 36.506 Superintendence by the contractor.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.236-6, Superintendence by the Contractor, in *solicitations* and contracts when a fixed-price *construction* contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed the *simplified acquisition threshold*. The *contracting officer**may* insert the clause in *solicitations* and contracts when a fixed-price *construction* or a fixed-price contract for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to be at or below the *simplified acquisition threshold*.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

GREGORY ROLAND,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-255-AW-GRJ

SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEP’T OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Gregory Roland has again petitioned for § 2254 relief. I have considered the 

magistrate judge’s November 3, 2020, Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3), 

to which there have been no objections. I agree with the magistrate judge that this 

case must be dismissed. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated into this order. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “This 

successive § 2254 petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.” The clerk will then 

close the file.

SO ORDERED on December 3, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00255-AW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 12/03/20 Page 1 of 1
§ 769.163 Loan closing. ( a ) *HPRP loan documents and security instruments.* At loan closing, the intermediary will execute the HPRP loan agreement or supplemental loan agreement, HPRP promissory note, the HPRP security agreement, the control agreement, and any other security instruments required by the Agency.
( b ) *Intermediary certification.* At loan closing, the intermediary must certify that: ( 1 ) No changes have been made in the intermediary's relending plan except those approved in the interim by the Agency;
( 2 ) All requirements in the letter of conditions have been met; and
( 3 ) There has been no material change in the intermediary or its financial condition since the issuance of the letter of conditions. If there have been changes, the intermediary must explain the changes to the Agency. The Agency will review the changes and respond in writing prior to loan closing.
§ 632.18 Special projects. ( a ) The NRCS State conservationist may approve the following types of special projects subject to the eligibility requirements, funding priorities, and cost-share rates as stated in §§ 632.12, 632.13, 632.14, 632.15, and 632.17: ( 1 ) Field trials or demonstration projects recommended by the State reclamation committee.
( 2 ) Projects to enhance water quality and quantity where past coal-mining practices disturbed local water supplies and where joint action by a group of eligible land users in cooperation with Federal and State agencies is needed to restore the water resource.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

DAVID FINNEY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-622-WKW

)

NISSAN NORTH AMERICAN, INC.,, et al., ) 

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

It is hereby ORDERED that the pretrial set in Opelika, Alabama for July 23, 2007 is

rescheduled for July 18, 2007, in the G. W. Andrews Federal Building & U. S. Courthouse, 701

Avenue A, Opelika, Alabama. The August 20, 2007 trial date remains the same. 

Done this the 18th day of January, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 44 Filed 01/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 4 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 5 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 6 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 7 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 8 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 9 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 10 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 11 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 12 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 13 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 14 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 15 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 16 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 17 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 18 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 19 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 20 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 21 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 22 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 23 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 24 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 25 of 26
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-12 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 26 of 26
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3063]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting: Federal Maritime Commission.
    Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 75 FR 6205.

Previously Announced Time and Date of the Meeting: February 10, 2010-10 
a.m.

Change: 1. The Meeting scheduled on February 10, 2010 was canceled due 
to inclement weather and rescheduled for February 18, 2010 at 10 a.m.
    2. Removal of Item 1 in the Open Session--Docket No. 06-01: 
Worldwide Relocations, Inc.; et al.--Possible Violations of Sections 8, 
10, and 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 and the Commission's Regulations 
at 46 CFR 515.3, 515.21, and 520.3--Request for Extension of Time.

Contact Person for More Information: Rachel Dickon, Assistant 
Secretary, (202) 523-5725.

Rachel Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-3063 Filed 2-12-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
52.107 Provisions and clauses prescribed in

subpart 52.1.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.252-1, Solicitation Provisions Incorporated

by Reference, in solicitations in order to incorporate provisions by reference.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.252-2, Clauses Incorporated by Reference, in

solicitations and contracts in order to incorporate clauses by reference.

(c) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.252-3, Alterations in Solicitation, in

solicitations in order to revise or supplement, as necessary, other parts of the solicitation that apply

to the solicitation phase only, except for any provision authorized for use with a deviation.

(d) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.252-4, Alterations in Contract, in solicitations

and contracts in order to revise or supplement, as necessary, other parts of the contract, or parts of

the solicitations that apply to the contract phase, except for any clause authorized for use with a

deviation.

(e) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.252-5, Authorized Deviations in Provisions,

in solicitations that include any FAR or supplemental provision with an authorized deviation.

Whenever any FAR or supplemental provision is used with an authorized deviation, the contracting

officer shall identify it by the same number, title, and date assigned to the provision when it is used

without deviation, include regulation name for any supplemental provision, except that the

contracting officer shall insert "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.

(f) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.252-6, Authorized Deviations in Clauses, in

solicitations and contracts that include any FAR or supplemental clause with an authorized

deviation. Whenever any FAR or supplemental clause is used with an authorized deviation, the

contracting officer shall identify it by the same number, title, and date assigned to the clause when it

is used without deviation, include regulation name for any supplemental clause, except that the

contracting officer shall insert "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the clause.

Parent topic: Subpart 52.1 - Instructions for Using Provisions and Clauses
Exhibit 10.6


             


            
                	
                            $20,000.00

                        	
                            December 2, 2008

                        


            


             


            PROMISSORY NOTE


             


            As hereinafter agreed, Wasatch Food Services, Inc. jointly and severally, promises to pay to the order of West Coast Trees, Inc., twenty thousand dollars and no cents ($20,000.00). It is hereby agreed that said amount shall be payable upon demand. Interest shall accrue at the rate of Eight Percent (8%) per annum on the unpaid principal balance until the whole amount of the principal
            and interest is paid. There shall be no penalty for early payment of this note.


             


            Should default be made in the payment of the demand note then the whole unpaid amount shall become immediately due and payable; and in the event default is made and said note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection or suit is brought on the same, the undersigned agrees to pay all costs and attorney’s fees that might be incurred. If there is a lawsuit, borrower
            agrees upon lender’s request to submit to the jurisdiction of the county of Utah County, the State of Utah. This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Utah.


             


             


            UNDERSIGNED:


            Ben Peay


             


            
                	
                             

                        	
                            /s/ Ben Peay

                             Ben Peay, President

                            Wasatch Food Services, Inc.