alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Theodore Tetenbaum, Respondent-Appellant, v Paulette J. Tetenbaum, Appellant-Respondent.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties had entered into a stipulation in open court, (1) the defendant wife appeals, as limited by her brief and notice of appeal, from (a) stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered April 25, 1980, which, *inter alia,*denied her motion to vacate a judgment of divorce based upon the stipulation and (b) stated portions of three orders of the same court, all dated June 30, 1980, which, *inter alia,*again denied her motion to vacate the stipulation and directed that she comply with certain of the terms thereof and (2) the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of one of the orders dated June 30, 1980, as declined to make any direction concerning the defendant’s criminal action against him in the Village Court of Hastings-on-Hudson. Upon appeals by defendant, four orders affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Cross appeal dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiff husband commenced this action for divorce in June, 1979. On January 28, 1980 the case came on for trial. After the plaintiff testified, the substance of which was very damaging to the defendant, the parties and their attorneys worked out a settlement. Thereafter, a stipulation of settlement was entered into in open court. Defendant was at all times represented by competent counsel. In response to the court’s query, defendant inidcated that she understood and accepted the terms of the stipulation. Thereafter, by judgment dated February 13, 1980, both parties were granted a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. The judgment specifically stated that the stipulation of settlement would survive said judgment. Thereafter, the defendant moved, *inter alia,*to vacate the judgment on the ground that at the time she entered into the stipulation she was confused and did not fully understand its terms since French is her native tongue. She further asserted that the settlement was financially inequitable. Special Term denied the motion. We affirm. Relief from a stipulation of settlement should only be granted upon a showing of good cause, such as collusion, mistake, accident, or a similar ground (see, e.g., *Stiber v Stiber,*65 AD2d 758; *Rado v Rado,*51 AD2d 811). The record herein indicates that defendant was represented by competent counsel and that she consented to the terms of the stipulation in open court (see *Stiber v Stiber, supra; Kaplan v Kaplan,*60 AD2d 594; Stein v Stein, 57 AD2d 922; *Dastin v Dastin,*54 AD2d 749; *Rado v Rado,supra).*Moreover, on the record before us, we see nothing inequitable or unfair about the stipulation of settlement. Ample provision was made for the wife and a fair distribution of the parties’ property was provided for therein. Concerning the husband’s cross appeal, the issue has become moot in view of the dismissal of criminal charges against him, after a trial. Hopkins, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
§ 7.30 Custody and use of books, records, and documents. ( a ) All books, records, and documents of or used by the county committee in the administration of programs assigned to it, or in the conduct of elections, will be the property of FSA or the United States Department of Agriculture, as applicable, and must be maintained in good order in the county office.
( b ) Voted ballots must be placed into and remain in sealed containers, such containers not being opened until the prescribed date and time for counting. Following the counting of ballots, the ballots must be placed in sealed containers and retained for 1 year unless otherwise determined by the Deputy Administrator.
( c ) The books, records, and documents referred to in paragraph (a) of this section must be available for use and examination: ( 1 ) At all times by authorized representatives of the Secretary, the Administrator, or a designee of the Administrator.
( 2 ) By State and county committee members, and authorized employees of the State and county office in the performance of duties assigned to them under this part, subject to instructions issued by the Deputy Administrator;
( 3 ) At any reasonable time to any program participant insofar as such person's interests under the programs administered by the county committee may be affected, subject to instructions issued by the Deputy Administrator; and
( 4 ) To any other person only in accordance with instructions issued by the Deputy Administrator.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 5:03cr59/MCR

FREDDY J. WILLIAMS,

Defendant,

_____________________________/

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the motion of the United States of 

America for a Final Order of Forfeiture. Being fully advised in the premises, the Court

finds:

WHEREAS, on September 1, 2004, this Court entered a Preliminary Order of

Forfeiture against the following property:

$12,207.75 United States Currency

pursuant to the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 853 based upon the Defendant’s convictions and

the Forfeiture Count of the Indictment; and

WHEREAS, on April 8, 2005, the United States published in The News Herald, a

newspaper of general circulation, notice of this forfeiture and the intent of the United States

to dispose of the property, in accordance with the law, and further notifying all third parties

of their right to file a petition within thirty (30) days of the final publication setting forth their

interest in said property; and

Case 5:03-cr-00059-MCR Document 193 Filed 05/25/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 5:03cr59/MCR

WHEREAS, no other persons or entities having an interest in the above-referenced

property have filed timely petitions, it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the right, title and interest to the

above-referenced property, is hereby condemned, forfeited and vested in the United States

of America.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of May, 2005.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:03-cr-00059-MCR Document 193 Filed 05/25/05 Page 2 of 2
### Chlorothalonil (081901) Cal. DPR Usage Data

Publicly available data from the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CADPR) was used to produce the following table outlining the pounds of Chlorothalonil used in California over the three

most recent years available (2007 ‐ 2009.

Commodity 2007 Pounds App lied 2008 Pounds App lied 2009 Pounds A pp lied ALFALFA (FORAGE ‐ FODDER) (ALFALFA HAY) 158 ALMOND 99969 100940 98458 APRICOT 646 762 1386 BARLEY, GENERAL 123 BEANS (ALL OR UNSPEC) 106 102 120 BEANS, DRIED

‐ TYPE 337 45 BEANS, SUCCULENT (OTHER THAN LIMA) 71 14 52 BERMUDAGRASS (FORAGE ‐ FODDER) 97 130 BOK CHOY (WONG BOK) 3 BROCCOLI 5935 2857 2434 BRUSSELS SPROUTS 6038 4355 3217 CABBAGE 1724 2233 2642 CANTALOUPE 282 638 21 CARROTS, GENERAL 24964 22511 21336 CAULIFLOWER 1197 479 722 CELERY, GENERAL 31559 30738 31236 CHERRY 457 959 434 CHINESE CABBAGE (NAPPA, WON BOK, CELERY CABBAGE) 206 85 192 COLLARDS 28 20 CORN, FIELD, DENT (GRAIN CROP) 98 CORN, HUMAN CONSUMPTION 38 67 5 CUCUMBER (PICKLING, CHINESE, ETC.) 8 24 6427 GAI LON 301 584 259 GARBANZOS (INCLUDING CHICK PEAS) 253 121 557 GARLIC 2633 105 70 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 92182 77983 78784 LEEK 594 724 5413 LETTUCE, LEAF (ALL OR UNSPEC) 18 8 MELONS 791 0 104 MUSHROOMS 3 68 1 NECTARINE 2352 3120 886 N

‐ GRNHS GRWN CUT FLWRS OR GREENS 1210 1874 2115 N

‐ GRNHS GRWN PLANTS IN CONTAINERS 1158 924 966 N

‐ GRNHS GRWN TRNSPLNT/PRPGTV MTRL 933 876 863 N

‐ OUTDR CONTAINER/FLD GRWN PLANTS 7114 4858 4529 N

‐ OUTDR GRWN CUT FLWRS OR GREENS 8083 8435 7128 N

‐ OUTDR GRWN TRNSPLNT/PRPGTV MTRL 12205 14257 10126 OATS, GENERAL 173SWISS CHARD (SPINACH BEET) 3 ONION (DRY, SPANISH, WHITE, YELLOW, RED, ETC.) 41899 42882 56014 ONIONS (GREEN) 459 386 411 ORNAMENTAL TURF (ALL OR UNSPEC) 1652 1499 2835 PARSNIP 45 PEACH 1654 2950 5430 PEPPERS (CHILI TYPE) (FLAVORING AND SPICE CROP) 0 PISTACHIO (PISTACHE NUT) 178 9 PEAS, GENERAL 36 PLUM (INCLUDES WILD PLUMS FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION) 1861 3968 1888 PLUOT 25 POTATO (WHITE, IRISH, RED, RUSSET) 43231 30571 43744 PRUNE 14131 16274 15531 PUMPKIN 111 9 816 REGULATORY PEST CONTROL 1 52 RESEARCH COMMODITY 11 30 75 RIGHTS OF WAY 46 54 36 SITE UNKNOWN 52 SOIL APPLICATION, PREPLANT

‐ OUTDOOR (SEEDBEDS,ETC.) 213 34 86 SPINACH 22 SQUASH (ALL OR UNSPEC) 59 68 67 SQUASH (SUMMER) 64 24 53 SQUASH (WINTER) (HUBBARD SQUASH, CALABAZA, ETC.) 45 200 STRAWBERRY (ALL OR UNSPEC) 894 2056 2726 STRUCTURAL PEST CONTROL 130 36 232 SUNFLOWER, GENERAL 37 SWISS CHARD (SPINACH BEET) 3 TOMATO 73526 39714 46035 TOMATOES, FOR PROCESSING/CANNING 255940 144857 252313 UNCULTIVATED AGRICULTURAL AREAS (ALL OR UNSPEC) 26 VEGETABLES (ALL OR UNSPEC) 1 VERTEBRATE PEST CONTROL 30 WATERMELONS 442 10 355 Grand Total 740496 566350 709734
Date Prepared: October 17, 2011 Cal DPR Data: http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/purmain.htm Empty cells indicate no available usage.
Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 60 Filed 03/07/22 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 60 Filed 03/07/22 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 60 Filed 03/07/22 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 60 Filed 03/07/22 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 60 Filed 03/07/22 Page 5 of 5
52.216-1 Type of Contract.       As prescribed in 16.105, complete and insert the following provision:          Type of Contract (Apr 1984)          The Government contemplates award of a ______________ [*Contracting Officer insert specific type of contract*] contract resulting from this solicitation.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.216 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.3



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Medytox Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2012
(the “Report”), I, William G. Forhan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Date:
    September 3, 2013 | __/s/ William G. Forhan_________
        William G. Forhan
        Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                            |
#### Federal National Mortgage Association, Respondent, v Alva Davis et al., Defendants, and Margaret Davis, Appellant.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, defendant Margaret Davis appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 5, 1979, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiff’s motion to dismiss her answer and affirmative defense. The appeal brings up for review so much of a further order of the same court, dated March 26, 1979, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order entered March 5, 1979 dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated March 26, 1979 affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements. The points raised by appellant are utterly devoid of any merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-618-MEF

)

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion for Leave to Amend Previously Filed

Amended Answer (Doc. #18) filed on December 18, 2006, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

DONE this the 19th day of December, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 19 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM 

PART I. TRANSCRIPT ORDER INFORMATION 

Appellant to complete and file with the District Court Clerk within 10 days of the filing of the notice of appeal in all cases, including 

those in which there was no hearing or for which no transcript is ordered.

Short Case Style: vs 

District Court No.: Date Notice of Appeal Filed: Court of Appeals No.: 

(If Available)

CHOOSE ONE: 9 No hearing 9 No transcript is required for appeal purposes 9 All necessary transcript(s) on file

9 I AM ORDERING A TRANSCRIPT OF THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS:

Check appropriate box(es) and provide all information requested:

 HEARING DATE(S) JUDGE/MAGISTRATE COURT REPORTER NAME(S) 

9 Pre-Trial Proceedings 

9 Trial 

9 Sentence 

9 Other 

 

METHOD OF PAYMENT:

9 I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONTACTED THE COURT REPORTER(S) AND HAVE MADE SATISFACTORY

 ARRANGEMENTS WITH THE COURT REPORTER(S) FOR PAYING THE COST OF THE TRANSCRIPT.

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT. Attached for submission to District Judge/Magistrate is my completed CJA Form 24 requesting authorization

for government payment of transcript. [A transcript of the following proceedings will be provided ONLY IF SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED

in Item 13 on CJA Form 24: Voir Dire; Opening and Closing Statements of Prosecution and Defense; Prosecution Rebuttal; Jury Instructions.]

Ordering Counsel/Party: 

Name of Firm: 

Street Address/P.O. Box: 

City/State/Zip Code: Phone No. : 

I certify that I have completed and filed PART I with the District Court Clerk, sent a copy to the appropriate Court Reporter(s) if ordering a

transcript, mailed a filed copy to the Court of Appeals Clerk, and served all parties.

DATE: SIGNED: Attorney for: 

 

PART II. COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT 

Court Reporter to complete and file with the District Court Clerk within 10 days of receipt. The Court Reporter shall send

a copy to the Court of Appeals Clerk and to all parties.

Date Transcript Order received: 

9 Satisfactory arrangements for paying the cost of the transcript were completed on: 

9 Satisfactory arrangements for paying the cost of the transcript have not been made.

No. of hearing days: Estimated no. of transcript pages: Estimated filing date: 

DATE: SIGNED: Phone No. : 

NOTE: The transcript is due to be filed within 30 days of the date satisfactory arrangements for paying the cost of the

transcript were completed unless the Court Reporter obtains an extension of time to file the transcript.

 

PART III. NOTIFICATION THAT TRANSCRIPT HAS BEEN FILED IN DISTRICT COURT 

Court Reporter to complete and file with the District Court Clerk on date of filing transcript in District Court. The Court

Reporter shall send a copy to the Court of Appeals Clerk on the same date.

This is to certify that the transcript has been completed and filed with the district court on (date): 

Actual No. of Volumes and Hearing Dates: 

Date: Signature of Court Reporter: 

Rev. 2/06

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 79 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Ellen E. Peck, Appellant.

(Submitted June 10, 1884 ;

decided June 24, 1884.)

*Henry A. Meyenborg*for appellant.

*John Vincent*for respondents.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2014358EN.01000101.xml

| 10.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 25 September 2014

appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

2014/C 358/01

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),

1

Having regard to the nomination submitted by the Commission in the category of Employers' representatives,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015.

2

| (2) | A member's seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of representatives of Employers' organisations has become vacant for Lithuania as a result of the resignation of Ms Dovilė BAŠKYTĖ. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of representatives of Employers' organisations has become vacant for Lithuania as a result of the resignation of Ms Dovilė BAŠKYTĖ.

| (3) | The member of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2015, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The member of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2015,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following person is hereby appointed as a member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2015:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS' ORGANISATIONS:

| LITHUANIA | Mr Aidas VAIČIULIS |
| --- | --- |

LITHUANIA

Mr Aidas VAIČIULIS

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2014.

For the Council

The President

F. GUIDI

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 228, 31.7.2012, p. 3.

2

---
49.001 Definitions.       As used in this part-          *Other work* means any current or scheduled work of the contractor, whether Government or commercial, other than work related to the terminated contract.          *Plant clearance period*, as used in this subpart, means the period beginning on the effective date of contract completion or termination and ending 90 days (or such longer period as may be agreed to) after receipt by the contracting officer of acceptable inventory schedules for each property classification. The final phase of the plant clearance period means that period after receipt of acceptable inventory schedules.          *Settlement agreement* means a written agreement in the form of a contract modification settling all or a severable portion of a settlement proposal.          *Settlement proposal* means a proposal for effecting settlement of a contract terminated in whole or in part, submitted by a contractor or subcontractor in the form, and supported by the data, required by this part. A settlement proposal is included within the generic meaning of the word "claim" under false claims acts (see 18 U.S.C.287 and 31 U.S.C.3729).          *Unsettled contract change* means any contract change or contract term for which a definitive modification is required but has not been executed.    **Parent topic:** Part 49 - Termination of Contracts
NEMS is a model of U.S. energy economy developed and maintained by the US

Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the US Department of Energy (DOE). NEMS is used to produce the Annual Energy Outlook, a reference publication that provides detai led forecasts of the energy economy from the current year to 2035. DOE first developed NEMS in the 1980s, and the model has undergone frequent updates and expansion since. DOE uses the modeling system extensively to produce issue reports, legislative

ana lyses, and respond to Congressional inquiries.

US EPA docketed three National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) program files that EPA modified in order to use NEMS to estimate the national energy system impacts of the Final New Source Performance Standards and Amendments to the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry. These codes are part of the larger set of source code that constitutes NEMS. Interested parties should contact the US Energy Informatio n for more information on NEMS or obtaining the complete source code.

The three files are:

1. wellcost.f (part of the Oil and Gas Supply Module) 2. ngitm.f (part of the Natural Gas Transmission and Distribution Module) 3. ngtdm.f (part of the Natural Ga s Transmission and Distribution Module)

Brief explanations of how the codes were modified are provided within each program file. However, for more detail, the reader should consultSection 7 of the Regulatory Impact Analysis which is also availablein the Do cket.
52.247-19 Stopping in Transit for Partial

Unloading.

As prescribed in 47.207-6 (c)(5)(ii), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for

transportation or for transportation-related services when multiple shipments are tendered at one

time to the contractor for transportation from one origin to two or more consignees along the route

between origin and last destination:

Stopping in Transit for Partial Unloading (Apr 1984)

When multiple shipments are tendered at one time to the Contractor for movement from one origin

to two or more consignees along the route between the origin and the last destination, the rate

charged shall be the rate applicable to the aggregate weight, plus a charge of $______ for each

shipment unloaded at an intermediate point en route to the last destination.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Diversity (Student)Educational ChangeEducational DiscriminationEducational EnvironmentEqual EducationEthnic RelationsHigher EducationInstitutional EnvironmentMinority GroupsMulticultural EducationRacial AttitudesRacial IntegrationRacial RelationsSchool CultureStudent School Relationship

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Amendment to Consulting Agreement



 Exhibit 10.9 
 AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment is made as of this 22 day of April, 2009
(“Effective Date”), by and between Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC (“SCI”), a Delaware corporation, with offices at 5005 E. McDowell Rd. Phoenix, AZ 85008, doing business as ON Semiconductor (“SCI”), and
Phil Hester with offices at 3320 Ranch Road 620 North, Austin, TX 78734 (“Consultant”), (collectively, the “Parties”). 
 WHEREAS, effective December 22, 2008, the Parties entered into a Consulting Agreement under which Consultant provides certain services to SCI (the “Consulting Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend the Consulting Agreement by extending the term of Consultant’s services; 
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Any capitalized terms not defined herein, shall have the meaning set forth in the Consulting Agreement. 

  

	 	2.	In the TERM paragraph of the Statement of Work attached to the Consulting Agreement, the Parties extend the END DATE to April 30, 2009. 

  

	 	3.	All other terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement remain the same. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date. 
  

									
	CONSULTANT	 	 	 	 SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS
 INDUSTRIES, LLC

					
	By:	 	 /s/  PHIL HESTER
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/  G. SONNY CAVE

		 	Phil Hester	 		 		 	G. Sonny Cave
		 		 		 	Title:	 	Senior Vice President and General Counsel