alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2743 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2743

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-oxa-3, 20-Diazadispiro [5.1.11.2] 
     Heneicosan-21-one 2,2,4,4-Tetramethyl, reaction products with 
             Epichloro-hydrin, hydrolyzed and polymerized.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2006

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-oxa-3, 20-Diazadispiro [5.1.11.2] 
     Heneicosan-21-one 2,2,4,4-Tetramethyl, reaction products with 
             Epichloro-hydrin, hydrolyzed and polymerized.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-OXA-3, 20-DIAZADISPIRO [5.1.11.2] HENEICOSAN-21-ONE 
              2,2,4,4-TETRAMETHYL, REACTION PRODUCTS WITH EPICHLORO-
              HYDRIN, HYDROLYZED AND POLYMERIZED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.09.01      1-oxa-3, 20-         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/    '
                        Diazadispiro                                                        31/2009           '.
                        [5.1.11.2]
                        Heneicosan-21-one
                        2,2,4,4-
                        Tetramethyl,
                        reaction products
                        with Epichloro-
                        hydrin, hydrolyzed
                        and polymerized
                        (CAS No. 202483-55-
                        4) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        3911.90.25).......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
50.206 Solicitation provisions and contract

clause.

(a) Insert the provision at 52.250-2, SAFETY Act Coverage Not Applicable, in solicitations if-

(1) The agency consulted with DHS on a questionable case of SAFETY Act applicability to an

acquisition in accordance with 50.205-1(a), and after the consultation, the agency has determined

that SAFETY Act protection is not applicable for the acquisition; or

(2) DHS has denied approval of a pre-qualification designation notice.

(b)

(1) Insert the provision at 52.250-3, SAFETY Act Block Designation/Certification, in a solicitation

when DHS has issued a block designation/certification for the solicited technologies.

(2) Use the provision at 52.250-3 with its Alternate I when contingent offers are authorized in

accordance with 50.205-3.

(3) Use the provision at 52.250-3 with its Alternate II when offers presuming SAFETY Act

designation or certification are authorized in accordance with 50.205-4. If this alternate is used, the

contracting officer may increase the number of days within which offerors must submit their

SAFETY Act designation or certification application.

(c)

(1) Insert the provision at 52.250-4, SAFETY Act Pre-qualification Designation Notice, in a

solicitation for which DHS has issued a pre-qualification designation notice.

(2) Use the provision at 52.250-4 with its Alternate I when contingent offers are authorized in

accordance with 50.205-3.

(3) Use the provision at 52.250-4 with its Alternate II when offers presuming SAFETY Act

designation or certification are authorized in accordance with 50.205-4. If this alternate is used, the

contracting officer may increase the number of days within which offerors must submit their

SAFETY Act designation or certification application.

(d) Insert the clause at 52.250-5, SAFETY Act-Equitable Adjustment-

(1) In the solicitation, if the provision at 52.250-3 or 52.250-4 is used with its Alternate II; and

(2) In any resultant contract, if DHS has not issued SAFETY Act designation or certification to the

successful offeror before contract award.

Parent topic: Subpart 50.2 - Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of

2002
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ralph Steiner, Appellant.

— Judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered March 13, 1979, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr169-WHA

)

WILMONT TIMOTHY BARNETT )

ORDER

Upon consideration of defendant's motion to produce defendant for pretrial hearing

(Doc. # 173), filed March 31, 2007, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is GRANTED. The United States Marshal

shall produce defendant for the pretrial conference set for 3:00 p.m. on April 2, 2007 in

courtroom 5-B, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex.

DONE, this 2nd day of April, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 174 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
52.214-22 Evaluation of Bids for Multiple

Awards.

As prescribed in 14.201-6(q), insert the following provision:

Evaluation of Bids for Multiple Awards (Mar 1990)

In addition to other factors, bids will be evaluated on the basis of advantages and disadvantages to

the Government that might result from making more than one award (multiple awards). It is

assumed, for the purpose of evaluating bids, that $500 would be the administrative cost to the

Government for issuing and administering each contract awarded under this solicitation, and

individual awards will be for the items or combinations of items that result in the lowest aggregate

cost to the Government, including the assumed administrative costs.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.214 [Reserved]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raphael Sanchez, Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 307]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered October 20, 2003, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review the issue of whether the court properly charged the jury on the People’s burden of proving his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v McAloney,*2 AD3d 538, 539 [2003]). In any event, the jury charge as a whole correctly explained the concept of reasonable doubt to the jury and “adequately apprised the jury of the proper standard of proof to apply to the evidence before it” *(People v Blackshear,*112 AD2d 1044, 1045-1046 [1985]), and therefore did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial *(see People v Grant,*294 AD2d 597 [2002]; *People v Hawkins,*228 AD2d 450 [1996]; *People v Perez,*210 AD2d 264 [1994]; *People v Reyes,*207 AD2d 362 [1994]; *People v Brooks,*152 AD2d 591 [1989]). Miller, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO.: 4:02cr45-SPM

vs.

THYRON CORNELL RICHARDSON ,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER CONTINUING SENTENCING HEARING

Upon consideration, the Government’s unopposed motion to continue the

sentencing hearing (doc. 336) is granted. The sentencing hearing is reset for

1:30 p.m. on November 17, 2008, at the United States Courthouse in

Tallahassee, Florida.

DONE AND ORDERED on this sixteenth day of October, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge
32.902 Definitions.

As used in this subpartDiscount for prompt payment means an invoice payment reduction offered by the contractor for

payment prior to the due date.

Mixed invoice means an invoice that contains items with different payment due dates.

Payment date means the date on which a check for payment is dated or, for an electronic funds

transfer (EFT), the settlement date.

Settlement date, as it applies to electronic funds transfer, means the date on which an electronic

funds transfer payment is credited to the contractor’s financial institution.

Parent topic: Subpart 32.9 - Prompt Payment
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2813 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2813

                For the relief of Claudia Marquez Rico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2006

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Claudia Marquez Rico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR CLAUDIA MARQUEZ RICO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Claudia 
Marquez Rico shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Claudia Marquez Rico enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and, if 
otherwise eligible, shall be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees not later than 2 years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Claudia Marquez Rico, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Claudia 
Marquez Rico shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
EVEREST HICKORY GLEN, LP, as Assignor

(BORROWER)

 

LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, FSB, as Assignee

(LENDER) 

 

 

**ASSIGNMENT**

**OF LEASES AND RENTS**

 

 

| Dated:    | December __, 2006                                           |
|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|      |                                                        |
| Location: | 1700-1750 West Washington StreetSpringfield, Illinois 62702 |
|      |                                                        |
| County:   | Sangamon                                                    |

 

 

PREPARED BY AND UPON

RECORDING RETURN TO:

 

Best & Flanagan LLP 

225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-4690

Attention: Daniel R. Tyson

Telephone: (612) 339-7121

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RFMSI Series 2006-S9 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

   In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
   information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
   SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association.

Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      --------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
§ 51.1265 Tolerances. ( a ) In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, not more than a total of 10 percent of the pears in any lot may fail to meet the requirements of grade: *Provided,* That not more than 5 percent shall be seriously damaged by insects, and not more than 1 percent shall be allowed for decay or internal breakdown.
( b ) When applying the foregoing tolerances to the combination grade no part of any tolerance shall be used to reduce the percentage of U.S. No. 1 pears required in the combination, but individual containers may have not more than 10 percent less than the percentage of U.S. No. 1 required: *Provided,* That the entire lot averages within the percentage specified.
#### § 52.43 Fees to be charged and collected for sampling when performed by a licensed sampler.

Such sampling fees as are specifically prescribed by the Administrator in connection with licensing of the particular sampler will be assessed and collected from the applicant by the office of inspection serving the area where services are performed: *Provided,* That if the employee is an employee of a state, the appropriate authority of the state may make the collection.

[48 FR 12326, Mar. 24, 1983]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Novell, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Ronald W.
Hovsepian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * *



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald W.
Hovsepian              
|Ronald W. Hovsepian                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: September 4, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2717 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2717

     To temporarily reduce the duty on manicure and pedicure sets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2006

 Mrs. Lincoln introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To temporarily reduce the duty on manicure and pedicure sets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MANICURE AND PEDICURE SETS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.82.14      Manicure and        1.96%        No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         pedicure sets,                                                     31/2009
                         and combinations
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         8214.20.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr169-WKW

)

DEMETRIOUS TERRELL PEGUES, )

et al., )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the motions for reimbursement of copy expenses by Defendant

James Calvin Talley (Doc. # 129), Defendant Wilmont Timothy Barnett (Doc. # 131),

Defendant Kowosky Tywan Christian (Doc. # 134), Defendant William Earl Ulmer (Doc.

# 145), and Defendant Christopher Iman Ulmer (Doc. # 147), and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motions are GRANTED. The court finds defendants eligible for

an interim reimbursement for the expense of copying discovery provided by the government,

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(d)(1) and the Guide to Judiciary Policies and Procedures,

Volume 7, Section C, Chapter 2.27. Counsel may file for reimbursement of these expenses

using Form 20.

DONE, this 2nd day of April, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 177 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 500.1 General.

The rules and regulations in this part apply to the buildings and grounds of the U.S. National Arboretum (USNA), Washington, DC, and to all persons entering in or on such property. The Administrator, General Services Administration, has delegated to the Secretary of Agriculture, with authority to further delegate, the authority to make all the needful rules and regulations for the protection of the buildings and grounds of the USNA (34 FR 6406). The Secretary of Agriculture has in turn delegated such authority to the Administrator, Agricultural Research Service (34 FR 7389). The rules and regulations in this part are issued pursuant to such delegations.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

LAURA JEAN BARNES,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-277-AW-GRJ

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting 

Commissioner of the Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have carefully considered the magistrate judge’s April 8, 2022 Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 21, to which no objections have been filed. I now 

conclude that the Report and Recommendation should be approved, and it is adopted 

and incorporated by reference into this order. The clerk will enter a judgment that 

states “The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.” The clerk will then close the 

file.

SO ORDERED on May 26, 2022.

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00277-AW-GRJ Document 22 Filed 05/26/22 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002George W. Hamlin, IV, President and Chief Executive Officer and Lawrence A. Heilbronner, Chief Financial Officer, of Canandaigua National Corporation (the "Company"), each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010, and that to the best of his knowledge:  (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Company.The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.November 5, 2010/s/ George W. Hamlin, IV/s/ Lawrence A. HeilbronnerGeorge W. Hamlin, IVLawrence A. HeilbronnerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Valentine A. Negron, Appellant, v. Ross E. Herold, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

Reynolds, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Clinton County, denying appellant’s application for an order to show cause in a proceeding brought under CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent to provide him with a jury trial to determine his mental status. The denial of an ex parte order to show cause is not appealable *(Matter of Karris*v. *New York State Bd. of Parole,*7 A D 2d 662; *Matter of Petmenga [People],*1 A D 2d 919). The appeal is therefore dismissed without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek a jury trial through compliance with the relevant provisions of the Mental Hygiene Law. Appeal dismissed, without costs. Reynolds, J. P., Aulisi, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J. P.