alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7679

BERNIE J.E. DINGLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLIE CONDON, Attorney General, Respondents - Appellees.

No. 05-6337

BERNIE J.E. DINGLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLIE CONDON, Attorney General, Respondents - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-02-3422-3-26BC) Submitted: July 14, 2005 Decided: August 2, 2005- 2 - Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernie J.E. Dingle, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAM: Bernie J.E. Dingle seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) (Appeal No. 04-7679), and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion (Appeal No. 05-6337). An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). As to claims dismissed by a district court solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dingle has not satisfied either standard. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability, deny Dingle’s motion to compel, and dismiss the appeals. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense- 4 - with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0614 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. GARY HANSEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER
Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, Court Reporter Sheena Jendro Cobb is granted an extension of time to and including June 22 , 2020, within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 29 2020

04/29/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0614
§ 400.91 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart applies to: ( 1 ) Adverse decisions made by personnel of the Agency with respect to: ( i ) Contracts of insurance insured by FCIC; and
( ii ) Contracts of insurance of private insurance companies and reinsured by FCIC under the provisions of the Act.
( 2 ) Determinations of good farming practices made by personnel of the Agency or the reinsured company (see § 400.98).
( b ) This subpart is not applicable to any decision: ( 1 ) Made by the Agency with respect to any matter arising under the terms of the Standard Reinsurance Agreement with the reinsured company; or
( 2 ) Made by any private insurance company with respect to any contract of insurance issued to any producer by the private insurance company and reinsured by FCIC under the provisions of the Act, except for determinations of good farming practices specified in § 400.91(a)(2).
( c ) With respect to matters identified in § 400.91(a)(1), participants may request an administrative review, mediation, or both, or appeal of adverse decisions by the Agency made with respect to: ( 1 ) Denial of participation in the crop insurance program;
( 2 ) Compliance with terms and conditions of insurance;
( 3 ) Issuance of payments or other program benefits to a participant in the crop insurance program; and
( 4 ) Issuance of payments or other benefits to an individual or entity who is not a participant in the crop insurance program.
( d ) Only a participant may seek an administrative review and mediation under this subpart, as applicable.
( e ) Notwithstanding any other provision, this subpart does not apply to any decision made by the Agency that is generally applicable to all similarly situated program participants. Such decisions are also not appealable to NAD. If the Agency determines that a decision is not appealable because it is a matter of general applicability, the participant must obtain a review by the Director of NAD in accordance with 7 CFR 11.6(a) of the Agency's determination that the decision is not appealable before the participant may file suit against the Agency.
[67 FR 13251, Mar. 22, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 37720, June 25, 2003; 74 FR 8704, Feb. 26, 2009]
§ 761.54 Withdrawals from a supervised bank account. ( a ) The Agency will authorize a withdrawal from the supervised bank account for an approved purpose after ensuring that: ( 1 ) Sufficient funds in the supervised bank account are available;
( 2 ) No loan proceeds are disbursed prior to confirmation of proper lien position, except to pay for lien search if needed;
( 3 ) No checks are issued to “cash;” and
( 4 ) The use of funds is consistent with the current farm operating plan or other agreement with the Agency.
( b ) A check must be signed by the borrower with countersignature of the Agency, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section. All checks must bear the legend “countersigned, not as co-maker or endorser.”
( c ) The Agency will withdraw funds from a supervised bank account without borrower counter-signature only for the following purposes: ( 1 ) For application on Agency indebtedness;
( 2 ) To refund Agency loan funds;
( 3 ) To protect the Agency's lien or security;
( 4 ) To accomplish a purpose for which such advance was made; or
( 5 ) In the case of a deceased borrower, to continue to pay necessary farm expenses to protect Agency security in conjunction with the borrower's estate.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
      to U.S.C. Section 1350


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**




I,
      Robert
      S. Ellin, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of
      Zane Acquisition I, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that the annual
      report on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 of
      Zane Acquisition I, Inc. (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Zane Acquisition I, Inc.




Dated:
      March 31, 2008


/s/
                Robert S. EllinRobert
                S. Ellin
              Director
                and
              Chief
                Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      by
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and shall be furnished
      to
      the SEC or its staff upon request.
§ 63.106 Term of office. ( a ) The voting members of the Board shall serve for a term of three years; except that persons (other than the chairperson) appointed to the initial Board shall serve staggered terms of one, two, and three years, as determined by the Secretary.
( b ) No member may serve more than two consecutive full terms.
# 52.248 [Reserved]

- 52.248-1 Value Engineering. 
- 52.248-2 Value Engineering-Architect-Engineer. 
- 52.248-3 Value Engineering-Construction. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-CR-169-WKW

)

DEMETRIA MILLS )

ORDER

This case is before the court on TitleMax of Alabama’s Motion for Hearing to

Adjudicate the Validity of the Interest of TitleMax of Alabama, Inc. in the Property Ordered

Forfeited (Doc. # 559). It is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and a hearing on this

matter is SET for Friday, April 4, 2008, at 10:30 a.m., in courtroom 2-E of the United

States Courthouse, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE this 28th day of February, 2008.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 577 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### § 54.10 Authority of agent.

Proof that any person making an application or a request for service on behalf of any other person has the authority to do so may be required at the discretion of the Director or Chief.

[84 FR 48556, Sept. 16, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000760371
<NAME> WELLESLEY LEASE INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP III A
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          36,817
<SECURITIES>                                    14,197
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,014
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                    11,141,099
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,090,085)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,014
<SALES>                                        115,669
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,523
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               129,956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (6,653)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  43
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                110,265
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            110,265
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   110,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
Research                                  

# Enhanced Safety of Vehicles

International Technical Conference

Share:*Facebook**Twitter**LinkedIn**Mail*
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2464 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2464

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

  To revise a provision relating to a repayment obligation of the Fort 
 McDowell Yavapai Nation under the Fort McDowell Indian Community Water 
         Rights Settlement Act of 1990, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fort McDowell Indian Community Water 
Rights Settlement Revision Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
        (1) Fort mcdowell water rights settlement act.--The term ``Fort 
    McDowell Water Rights Settlement Act'' means the Fort McDowell 
    Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Act of 1990 (Public Law 
    101-628; 104 Stat. 4480).
        (2) Nation.--The term ``Nation'' means the Fort McDowell 
    Yavapai Nation, formerly known as the ``Fort McDowell Indian 
    Community''.
        (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of 
    the Interior.

SEC. 3. CANCELLATION OF REPAYMENT OBLIGATION.

    (a) Cancellation of Obligation.--The obligation of the Nation to 
repay the loan made under section 408(e) of the Fort McDowell Water 
Rights Settlement Act (104 Stat. 4489) is cancelled.
    (b) Effect of Act.--
        (1) Rights of nation under fort mcdowell water rights 
    settlement act.--
            (A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph (B), 
        nothing in this Act alters or affects any right of the Nation 
        under the Fort McDowell Water Rights Settlement Act.
            (B) Exception.--The cancellation of the repayment 
        obligation under subsection (a) shall be considered--
                (i) to fulfill all conditions required to achieve the 
            full and final implementation of the Fort McDowell Water 
            Rights Settlement Act; and
                (ii) to relieve the Secretary of any responsibility or 
            obligation to obtain mitigation property or develop 
            additional farm acreage under section 410 the Fort McDowell 
            Water Rights Settlement Act (104 Stat. 4490).
        (2) Eligibility for services and benefits.--Nothing in this Act 
    alters or affects the eligibility of the Nation or any member of 
    the Nation for any service or benefit provided by the Federal 
    Government to federally recognized Indian tribes or members of such 
    Indian tribes.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 4 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 5 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 6 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 7 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 8 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 9 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 10 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 11 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 12 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 13 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 14 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 15 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 16 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 17 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 18 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 19 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 20 of 21
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 21 of 21
222.7402 Policy.

(a) Departments and agencies are prohibited from using funds appropriated or otherwise made

available by the Fiscal Year 2010 Defense Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 111-118) or subsequent DoD

appropriations acts for any contract (including task or delivery orders and bilateral modifications

adding new work) in excess of $1 million, unless the contractor agrees not to—

(1) Enter into any agreement with any of its employees or independent contractors that requires, as

a condition of employment, that the employee or independent contractor agree to resolve through

arbitration–

(i) Any claim under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; or

(ii) Any tort related to or arising out of sexual assault or harassment, including assault and battery,

intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, or negligent hiring, supervision, or

retention; or

(2) Take any action to enforce any provision of an existing agreement with an employee or

independent contractor that mandates that the employee or independent contractor resolve through

arbitration–

(i) Any claim under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; or

(ii) Any tort related to or arising out of sexual assault or harassment, including assault and battery,

intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, or negligent hiring, supervision, or

retention.

(b) No funds appropriated or otherwise made available by the Fiscal Year 2010 Defense

Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 111-118) or subsequent DoD appropriations acts may be expended

unless the contractor certifies that it requires each covered subcontractor to agree not to enter into,

and not to take any action to enforce, any provision of any agreement, as described in paragraph (a)

of this section, with respect to any employee or independent contractor performing work related to

such subcontract.

Parent topic: Subpart 222.74 - RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF MANDATORYARBITRATION

AGREEMENTS
<page>

Exhibit 99.2

NORDSTROM CREDIT, INC.

13531 EAST CALEY

ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO  80111

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, Michael G. Koppel, the Vice President and Treasurer of Nordstrom
Credit, Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended October 31, 2002 (the "Report") filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission:

-  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

-  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
   all material respects, the financial condition and results
   of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael G. Koppel
-----------------------
                                          Michael G. Koppel
                                          Vice President and Treasurer
                                          December 6, 2002
52.222-13 Compliance with Construction Wage Rate Requirements and Related Regulations.       As prescribed in 22.407(a), insert the following clause:          Compliance with Construction Wage Rate Requirements and Related Regulations (May 2014)          All rulings and interpretations of the Construction Wage Rate Requirements and related statutes contained in 29 CFR parts 1, 3, and 5 are hereby incorporated by reference in this contract.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.222 [Reserved]
exv10w22






Exhibit 10.22



[ * ] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has
been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule
24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

AMENDED SUPPLY AGREEMENT




     This FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED SUPPLY AGREEMENT (“Amendment No. 1”) is entered into as of
December 1st, 2008 (the “Effective Date”), between Endwave Corporation (“Endwave”) and
Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp., by and through Northrop Grumman Space Technology
Sector (“NGST”).



     WHEREAS, Endwave and NGST (the “Parties”) executed a Amended Supply Agreement with an
effective date of May 12th, 2008 (the “Agreement”);



     NOW THEREFOR, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:



     EXHIBIT A: Products and Pricing:



     1) The price per part number [*] has been reduced from [*] to [*].



     2) The following items have been added to Exhibit A: (all other items remain)



[*]**




Attachment No. 1 to this Agreement represents the changes herein

and provides current products and pricing



The above changes constitute Amendment No. 1 to the Amended Supply Agreement and are correctly
presented in Attachment No. 1 to this Agreement. Except as expressly provided herein above, all
other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall apply herein and shall remain in full force and
effect as previously agreed to between the Parties.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the undersigned parties have executed
this Amendment No. 1 as of the Effective Date.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ENDWAVE CORPORATION	 	 	 	NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSION	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	SYSTEMS CORP.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ [*]
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ [*]	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	[*]
	 	 	 	 	 	[*]	 	 
	 
	 
	130 Baytech Dr
	 	 	 	One Space Park Drive	 	 
	San Jose, CA 95134
	 	 	 	Redondo Beach, CA 90278	 	 
	(408) 522-3177
	 	 	 	(310) 813-9328	 	 






 









 






Attachment No. 1 to Amended Supply Agreement

EXHIBIT A

PRODUCTS AND PRICING




[*]




APPROVED:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ENDWAVE CORPORATION	 	 	 	NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSION	 	  
	 	 	 	 	 	 	SYSTEMS CORP.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ [*]

	 	12/22/08
	 	 	 	/s/ [*]
	 	12/19/08	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Date
	 	 	 	 	 	Date	 	 






	 		
	[ * ] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has
been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule
24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# L_2014289EN.01002101.xml

| 3.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 289/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 289/21

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 29 September 2014

appointing a Polish member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2014/693/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Polish Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1).

| (2) | A member's seaton the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Marzena MENDZA-DROZD, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seaton the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Marzena MENDZA-DROZD,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Michal Grzegorz MODRZEJEWSKI is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 29 September 2014.

For the Council

The President

S. GOZI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.

1

---