alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2637 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,4-Benzoquinone. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. ALEXANDER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,4-Benzoquinone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,4-BENZOQUINONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.29.15 1,4-Benzoquinone (CAS No. 

106-51-4) (provided for in 

subheading 2914.69.90) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 2637 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
#### § 760.1309 Appeals.

The appeal regulations set forth at 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 apply to determinations made under this subpart.
#### GUNTZER, Respondent, v. GUNTZER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 25, 1906.)

Action by Anthony C. Guntzer against Anna M. Guntzer.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Order filed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No.: 4:01-CR-029-SPM/AK

WILLIE CALVIN DAVIS,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge's Report

and Recommendation (doc. 121). The parties have been furnished a copy and

have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. No objections were filed.

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have

determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 121) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (doc. 116) is

hereby denied.

3. The Government’s motion to dismiss (doc. 119) is hereby granted.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-seventh day of November, 2007.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:01-cr-00029-RH-CAS Document 124 Filed 11/27/07 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Freeman, Appellant, v. Vincent R. Mancusi, as Warden of Attica Prison, Respondent.

Order reversed and matter remitted to Wyoming County Court for a further hearing in accordance with the Memorandum. Memorandum: The relator is presently serving a sentence of not less than two and one-half and not more than five years in Attica State Prison. He alleges in his petition that following release on parole he was returned to prison as a parole violator, and that the alleged violation and requirement that he serve out in prison the balance of his term was a result of certain actions and representations by the parole authorities which, in effect, constituted entrapment and fraud. Upon the return of the writ the court addressed a brief inquiry to the relator as to the substance of his claim and then stated that he would consider the case submitted and reserve decision. Thereafter he ordered the writ dismissed and the relator remanded to the custody of the Warden of Attica Prison. While the courts have uniformly held that the discretionary power vested in the Parole Board to revoke a prisoner’s parole cannot be reviewed by habeas corpus, the actions of the board are not beyond judicial review if they are in violation of the statutes under which the board derives its power. “ The statutes declare that the action of the Board in releasing or refusing to release prisoners shall not be reviewable if in accordance with law.” *(Matter of Hines*v. *State Board of Parole,*293 N. Y. 254, 257.) The petition here charges arbitrary and fraudulent conduct on the part of the parole authorities which, if proved, would constitute a complete failure on their part to exercise the discretion accorded them by law. The merit and substance of the allegations can only be determined by the court after a hearing at which whatever proof petitioner may have to support them may be submitted. All concur except Williams, P. J. and Henry, J., who dissent and vote to affirm. (Appeal from order of Wyoming County Court dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RYAN COVEMAKER, DC #S05952, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. )

) Case No. 2D18-2636

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 25, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee 

County; Charles Sniffen, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SLEET, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
§ 58.122 Approved plants under USDA inspection and grading service. ( a ) Adoption of certain sound practices at dairy plants will significantly aid the operators to manufacture more consistently, uniform high-quality stable dairy products. Only dairy products manufactured, processed and packaged in an approved plant may be graded or inspected and identified with official identification. The specifications established herein provide the basis for a quality maintenance program which may be effectively carried forward through official inspection, grading, and quality control service.
( b ) USDA inspection and grading service is provided to dairy product manufacturing plants on a voluntary basis. The operator of any dairy plant desiring to have such a plant qualified as an approved plant under USDA inspection and grading service may request surveys of such plant, premises, equipment, facilities, methods of operation, and raw material to determine whether they are adequate to permit inspection and grading service. The cost of this survey shall be borne by the applicant.
52.207-1 Notice of Standard Competition.       As prescribed in 7.305(a), insert the following provision:          Notice of Standard Competition (May 2006)                                       (a) 						            This solicitation is part of a standard competition under Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-76 (Revised), Performance of Commercial Activities, dated May 29, 2003 (hereafter "the Circular"), to determine whether to accomplish the specified work under contract or by Government performance.                                          (b) 						            The Government will evaluate private sector offers, the agency tender, and public reimbursable tenders, as provided in this solicitation and the Circular.                                          (c) 						            A performance decision resulting from this standard competition will be publicly announced in accordance with the Circular. If the performance decision favors a private sector offeror, a contract will be awarded. If the performance decision favors an agency or a public reimbursable tender, the Contracting Officer shall establish, respectively, either a Most Efficient Organization letter of obligation or a fee-for-service agreement, as those terms are defined in the Circular.                                          (d) 						            As provided in the Circular, directly interested parties may file contests, which are governed by the procedures in Federal Acquisition Regulation 33.103. Until resolution of any contest, or the expiration of the time for filing a contest, only legal agents for directly interested parties shall have access to the certified standard competition form, the agency tender, and public reimbursable tenders.                                 (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.207 [Reserved]
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of FitLife Brands, Inc.; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 29, 2016 | FitLife Brands, Inc. By: /s/ John Wilson        |   |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | John Wilson                                          |   |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |   |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7835

KEVIN M. BALLANCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PAGE TRUE, Warden, S1SP; GENE JOHNSON,

Assistant Director; SERGEANT BYRD, Property

Sergeant; INVESTIGATOR SMITH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-1263-AM)

Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 23, 2004

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin M. Ballance, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kevin M. Ballance appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to

state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have

reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Ballance v. True, No. CA-03-1263-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 17.

2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 63.107 Compensation.

Board members shall serve without compensation, but shall be reimbursed for their reasonable travel, subsistence, and other necessary expenses incurred in performing their duties as members of the Board.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ENEAS WALDEMAR ORTEGA-VARGAS,

A# 212–909–939,

Petitioner,

v. 4:20cv493–WS/MAF

WILLIAM BARR, et al.,

Respondents.

 

ORDER DIRECTING TRANSFER OF CASE

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 5) docketed October 20, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that the

action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of

Louisiana. Petitioner has filed no objections to the report and recommendation. 

The court having reviewed the matter, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 5) is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

Case 4:20-cv-00493-WS-MAF Document 7 Filed 11/19/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The clerk shall TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana, Alexandria Division, for all further

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of November , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00493-WS-MAF Document 7 Filed 11/19/20 Page 2 of 2
# L_2014048EN.01001201.xml

| 19.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 48/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 48/12

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2014/15/EU of 18 November 2013 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia establishing a framework for the participation of Georgia in European Union crisis management operations

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 14 of 18 January 2014
  )

On the cover, in the table of contents:

for:

‘2014/15/EU

Council Decision of 18 November 2013 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia establishing a framework for the participation of Georgia in European Union crisis management operations’,

read:

‘Council Decision 2014/15/CFSP of 18 November 2013 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia establishing a framework for the participation of Georgia in European Union crisis management operations’;

on page 1, in the title:

for:

‘COUNCIL DECISION

of 18 November 2013

on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia establishing a framework for the participation of Georgia in European Union crisis management operations

(2014/15/EU)’,

read:

‘COUNCIL DECISION 2014/15/CFSP

of 18 November 2013

on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia establishing a framework for the participation of Georgia in European Union crisis management operations’.

---
#### § 65.165 Ground goat.

*Ground goat* means comminuted goat of skeletal origin that is produced in conformance with all applicable Food Safety and Inspection Service labeling guidelines.
#### § 58.219 High pressure pumps and lines.

High pressure lines may be cleaned-in-place and shall be of such construction that dead ends, valves and the high pressure pumps can be disassembled for hand cleaning. The high pressure pump shall comply with the 3-A Sanitary Standard for Homogenizers and Pumps of the Plunger Type.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2808 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2808

    To suspend temporarily the duty on textured rolled glass sheets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2006

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on textured rolled glass sheets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEXTURED ROLLED GLASS SHEETS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking subheading 
9902.70.03 and inserting in numerical sequence the following new 
heading:

``      9902.70.03       Rolled glass in    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         sheets, yellow-                                                    31/2009
                         green in color,
                         not finished or
                         edged-worked,
                         textured on one
                         surface, suitable
                         for incorporation
                         in cooking
                         stoves, ranges,
                         or ovens
                         described in
                         subheading
                         8516.60.40
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         7003.12.00 or
                         7003.19.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 toQuarterly Report of Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jim B. Terry,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)    TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ JIM B. TERRY        |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Jim B. Terry            |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

Date:                    February 14, 2006

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Particle Drilling Technologies,Inc. and will be retained by Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 1:00cr15-SPM

LINDA WILSON,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING

After the Court issued the Order Granting Motion to Compel on July 3, 2012

(doc. 1376), the Court received from Linda Wilson a second response (doc. 1377)

to the motion to compel. The second response will be treated as a motion for

rehearing. For the following reasons, the motion for rehearing will be denied.

1. The Court has again reviewed the motion to compel (doc. 1373), Linda

Wilson’s first response (doc. 1374),and the record in this case, in addition to Linda

Wilson’s second response (doc. 1377). here is no basis to change the prior ruling

(doc. 1376) granting the motion to compel.

2. In her second response, Linda Wilson relies on United States v.

Bongiorno, 106 F.3d 1027 (1st Cir. 1997) to argue that criminal restitution owing to

a private party is not a debt owing to the United States. The Borgiorno case was

statutorily overruled by the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, as recognized in
Page 2 of 2

United States v. Witham, 648 F.3d 40 (1st Cir. 2011). The Mandatory Victim

Restitution Act applies to Linda Wilson’s restitution. The authority and the power of

the United States to collect the restitution owed by Linda Wilson was correctly stated

in the Order Granting Motion to Compel (doc. 1376).

Based on the foregoing, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Linda Wilson’s second response (doc. 1377),

treated as a motion for rehearing, is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of July, 2012.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 1:00cr15-SPM
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**RESTATED OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the periodcovered by this report on Form 10–K of Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2006-AR8 Trust(the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a  materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for theperiod covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

 

 

Date:  As of March 15,2007

|   |   | /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann                                                                        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  ThomasG. Lehmann                                                                 |
|   |   | Title:   President and Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor |
#### § 70.75 Travel expenses and other charges.

Charges are to be made to cover the cost of travel and other expenses incurred by the AMS in connection with rendering grading service. Such charges shall include the cost of transportation, per diem, and any other expenses.

[42 FR 2971, Jan. 14, 1977. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 9, Jan. 2, 1981. Redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 71 FR 42014, July 24, 2006]
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50594

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Casey Allen Murray, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:20-CR-13-1

Before Jones, Clement, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Casey Allen Murray has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Murray has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 7, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-50594 Document: 00515854055 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2021
No. 20-50594

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-50594 Document: 00515854055 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/07/2021
2006-0743.

#### Rogers v. Jeffreys.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Daryl E. Rogers. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.