alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2848 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2848 IS 

‘‘ 9902.10.18 Footwear with outer soles 

and uppers of rubber or 

plastics, incorporating a protective metal toecap, having 

uppers of which over 90 percent of the external surface 

area (including any accessories or reinforcements 

such as those mentioned in 

note 4(a) to chapter 64) is 

rubber or plastics (provided 

for in subheading 

6402.30.30) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 1 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 2 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 3 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 4 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 5 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 6 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 7 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 8 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 9 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 10 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 11 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 12 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 13 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 14 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 15 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-6 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 16 of 16
#### § 63.103 Appointment.

From the nominations made pursuant to § 63.101, the Secretary shall appoint the members of the Board.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

STARLEIGH Y. JUDKINS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV625-SRW

) (WO)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This action is presently before the court on the motion to remand filed by the

Commissioner on January 19, 2010 (Doc. # 16). The Commissioner asks that this court

reverse and remand this action pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plaintiff

does not oppose the motion and agrees that it is due to be granted (Doc. # 20). For good

cause, it is 

ORDERED that defendant’s motion to reopen the case (Doc. # 14) is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that defendant’s motion to remand is GRANTED. A separate

judgment will be entered. 

Done, this 18th day of February, 2010.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2727 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2727

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Solvent blue 124.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2006

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Solvent blue 124.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOLVENT BLUE 124.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.73 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Solvent blue 124) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 760.1504 Miscellaneous provisions. ( a ) All persons with a financial interest in the legal entity receiving payments under this subpart are jointly and severally liable for any refund, including related charges, which is determined to be due to FSA for any reason.
( b ) In the event that any application for payment under this subpart resulted from erroneous information or a miscalculation, the payment will be recalculated and any excess refunded to FSA with interest to be calculated from the date of the disbursement.
( c ) Any payment to any participant under this subpart will be made without regard to questions of title under State law, and without regard to any claim or lien against the commodity, or proceeds, in favor of the owner or any other creditor except agencies of the U.S. Government. The regulations governing offsets and withholdings in part 792 of this chapter apply to payments made under this subpart.
( d ) Any participant entitled to any payment may assign any payment(s) in accordance with regulations governing the assignment of payments in part 792 of this chapter.
( e ) The regulations in parts 11 and 780 of this title apply to determinations under this subpart.
§ 760.1305 Proof of production. ( a ) Dairy producers requesting benefits must, as required by this subpart, provide adequate proof of the dairy operation's eligible production during the months of February through July 2009, if those records are not already available at the FSA county office. The dairy operation must also provide proof that the eligible production was also commercially marketed during the same period.
( b ) To be eligible for payment, dairy producers marketing milk during February through July 2009 must provide any required supporting documents to assist FSA in verifying production. Supporting documentation may be provided by either the dairy producer or by the dairy operation for each of its producers. Examples of supporting documentation may include, but are not limited to: Milk marketing payment stubs, tank records, milk handler records, daily milk marketings, copies of any payments received as compensation from other sources, or any other documents available to confirm the production and production history of the dairy operation. Dairy operations and producers may also be required to allow FSA to examine the herd of cattle as production evidence. If supporting documentation requested is not presented to FSA, the request for benefits will be denied.
# 46.314 Transportation contracts.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.246-14, *Inspection* of Transportation, in *solicitations* and contracts for *freight* transportation services (including local drayage) by rail, motor (including bus), domestic *freight* forwarder, and domestic water carriers (including inland, coastwise, and intercoastal). The *contracting officer**shall* not use the clause for the *acquisition* of transportation services by domestic or international air carriers or by international ocean carriers, or to *freight* services provided under bills of lading or to those negotiated for reduced rates under 49 U.S.C. 10721 or 1 3712. (See part  47, Transportation.)

**Parent topic:**Subpart 46.3 - Contract Clauses
§ 66.112 Small and very small packages. In addition to the disclosures described in this subpart, for food in small and very small packages, the required disclosure may be in the form described in paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of this section. ( a ) The label bears the electronic or digital disclosure described in § 66.106, and replaces the statement and phone number required in § 66.106(a) with the statement “Scan for info.”
( b ) The label bears a number or short code as described in § 66.108(a), and replaces the statement with “Text for info.”
( c ) The label bears a phone number as described in § 66.110(a), and replaces the statement with “Call for info.”
( d ) For very small packages only, if the label includes a preexisting Uniform Resource Locator for a website or a telephone number that a consumer can use to obtain food information, that website or telephone number may also be used for the required bioengineered food disclosure, provided that the disclosure is consistent with § 66.102 or § 66.104 in written or audio form, as applicable.
§ 760.1610 Eligible and ineligible losses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) of this section, to be eligible for payments under this subpart the commodity stored in an eligible structure must have suffered a loss due to a qualifying disaster event.
( b ) A loss will not be eligible for the On-Farm Storage Loss Program this subpart if any of the following apply: ( 1 ) The cause of loss is determined by FSA to be the result of poor management decisions, poor farming practices, or previously damaged structures;
( 2 ) The cause of loss was due to failure of the participant to store the commodity in an eligible structure before the qualifying disaster event; or
( 3 ) The cause of loss was due to water contained or released by any governmental, public, or private dam or reservoir project if an easement exists on the acreage affected by the containment or release of the water.
( c ) The following types of loss, regardless of whether they were the result of an eligible disaster event, are not eligible losses: ( 1 ) Losses to crops that have not been harvested.
( 2 ) Losses to crops not intended for harvest;
( 4 ) Losses caused by improper storage;
( 5 ) Losses caused by the application of chemicals; and
( 6 ) Losses caused by theft.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 13 ,

2012

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00603

- CR

CONRAD JEROME MORGAN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 432nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1260983D



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A written request to withdraw the notice of appeal in this case, personally signed by appellant, has been filed with this Court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2. Because this
Court has not delivered an opinion, we grant appellant's request.
Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed. We direct the Clerk of the Court to issue the mandate of the Court immediately.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce, and McCally. Do Not Publish

- T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b)
**SAMPLE NOTICE FORMAT**

Note: When E-Filing this pleading, please enter a separate docket entry. The event entry is located on

CM/ECF by clicking: CIVIL > OTHER DOCUMENTS > CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

_________________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. __________________

)

_________________________________, )

)

Defendants, )

CORPORATE/CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

In accordance with the order of this Court, the undersigned party or parties to the

above-captioned matter do hereby make the following disclosure concerning parent

companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, partnership, joint ventures, debtor, creditors’ committee,

or other entities reportable under the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General

Order No. 3047:

There are no entities to be reported.

- or -

The following entities are hereby reported:

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

 Signature 

 Date Counsel

 

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

 

Address, City, State Zip Code

 

Telephone Number

***Certificate of Service Required

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 25-2 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                         Jan-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           Sep-30-1995
<CASH>                                      13,749
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            14,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,874
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      72,640
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        74,842
<LOANS>                                    207,640
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             322,278
<DEPOSITS>                                 283,066
<SHORT-TERM>                                     0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,667
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,019
<COMMON>                                     8,058
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             322,278
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             14,958
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,104
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               512
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            18,574
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           6,577
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,577
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       11,997
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  900
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              9,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,474
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,057
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                18.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                18.99
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                8.36
<LOANS-NON>                                 12,056
<LOANS-PAST>                                   191
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,202
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                1,055
<RECOVERIES>                                   171
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,218
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0
         

</TABLE>
#### §§ 761.12-761.50 [Reserved]
Case 4:20-cv-00212-AW-EMT Document 8 Filed 06/01/20 Page 1 of 5
Case 4:20-cv-00212-AW-EMT Document 8 Filed 06/01/20 Page 2 of 5
Case 4:20-cv-00212-AW-EMT Document 8 Filed 06/01/20 Page 3 of 5
Case 4:20-cv-00212-AW-EMT Document 8 Filed 06/01/20 Page 4 of 5
Case 4:20-cv-00212-AW-EMT Document 8 Filed 06/01/20 Page 5 of 5
1

Filed 3/24/22 Salas v. Quinn CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer)

----

TAMARA SALAS,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CYNTHIA QUINN,

Defendant and Appellant. C092741

(Super. Ct. No. SCV0045096)

D efendant Cynthia Quinn , in propria persona, appeals from a civil harassment
restraining order entered against her

. Because the restraining order expired by its terms
on January 20, 2021
, no appellate relief can be granted. We therefore dismiss the appeal

as moot.

BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEDURE
In June 2020, plaintiff Tamara Salas filed a petition for a civil harassment
restraining order (Code Civ. Proc., § 527.6) against defendant Quinn for harass ing

conduct alleged to have occurred over several months beginning in March 2020. Salas
alleged that she was harassed because Quinn believed Salas had an extramarital affair

with Quinn ’s then

- boyfriend

.2

The court held a contest ed evidentiary hearing on the restraining order on July 20
, 2020. At the conclusion of the hearing , the trial court granted the petition and issued a restraining order using Judicial Council form CH

- 130

. Quinn appealed from the order.

DISCUSSION
As a rule, an appeal becomes moot when the occurrence of an event makes it
impossible for the appellate court to grant any effective relief. ( Newsom v. Superior

Court (2021) 63 Cal.App.5th 1099, 1109 ; L incoln Place Tenants Assn. v. City of Los
Angeles (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 425, 454.) “ If relief granted by the trial court is
temporal, and if the relief granted expires before an appeal can be heard, then an appeal
by the adverse party is moot. [Citation.]” ( Environmental Charter High School v

. Centinela Valley Union High School Dist. (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 139, 144.)
The restraining order that is the subject of this appeal expired, by its own terms, on
January 20, 2021. As a result, the issue raised in this appeal has been rendered moot . An
opinion from this court can have no practical impact and provide no effectual relief.
At our request, Quinn filed a letter brief addressing why the appeal should not be

dismissed as moot

, but she has not presented any reason why we should reach the merit s of this appeal, and we can discern none from the record. Accordingly, we will dismiss

the appeal.

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed as moot. The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

KRAUSE , J.

We concur:

BLEASE , Acting P. J.

RENNER , J.
## Docket Number: FAA-2012-0640
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 1:03cr67-SPM

1:05cr3-SPM

VINCENTE ANTONIO TORRALBA,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER CONTINUING SENTENCING

For good cause shown, First Unopposed Motion to Continue Sentencing

(doc. 47) is granted. Sentencing is reset for 1:30 p.m. on July 11, 2005.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of May, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 1:03-cr-00067-SPM-AK Document 48 Filed 05/03/05 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 220 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 220

 For the relief of Mohamad Derani, Maha Felo Derani, and Tarek Derani.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2005

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 For the relief of Mohamad Derani, Maha Felo Derani, and Tarek Derani.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MOHAMAD DERANI, MAHA FELO 
              DERANI, AND TAREK DERANI.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Mohamad Derani, Maha Felo 
Derani, and Tarek Derani shall be eligible for issuance of immigrant 
visas or for adjustment of status to that of aliens lawfully admitted 
for permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of 
immigrant visas under section 204 of that Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Mohamad Derani, Maha Felo Derani, and 
Tarek Derani enter the United States before the filing deadline 
specified in subsection (c), Mohamad Derani, Maha Felo Derani, and 
Tarek Derani shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully 
and shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of enactment of this 
Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of immigrant 
visas or the application for adjustment of status are filed with 
appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of 
immigrant visas or permanent residence to Mohamad Derani, Maha Felo 
Derani, and Tarek Derani, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 
proper officer to reduce by 3, during the current or next following 
fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the aliens' birth under section 
203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of the aliens' birth under section 202(e) of that Act.
                                 <all>
```