alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2876 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2876

To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl 2-[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-
 ylcarbamoyl)sulfamoyl]-a-(methanesulfonamido)-p-toluate (Mesosulfuron-
  methyl) (CAS No. 208465-21-8) whether or not mixed with application 
                               adjuvants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl 2-[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-
 ylcarbamoyl)sulfamoyl]-a-(methanesulfonamido)-p-toluate (Mesosulfuron-
  methyl) (CAS No. 208465-21-8) whether or not mixed with application 
                               adjuvants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHYL 2-[(4,6-DIMETHOXYPYRIMIDIN-2-YLCARBAMOYL)SULFAMOYL]-
              A-(METHANESULFONAMIDO)-P-TOLUATE (MESOSULFURON-METHYL) 
              WHETHER OR NOT MIXED WITH APPLICATION ADJUVANTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.11.48       Methyl 2-[(4,6-    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         dimethoxypyrimidi                                                  31/2009
                         n-2-
                         ylcarbamoyl)sulfa
                         moyl]-a-
                         (methanesulfonami
                         do)-p-toluate
                         (Mesosulfuron-
                         methyl) (CAS No.
                         208465-21-8)
                         whether or not
                         mixed with
                         application
                         adjuvants
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2935.00.75 or
                         3808.30.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2690

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 8801 Sudley Road in Manassas, Virginia, as

the ‘‘Harry J. Parrish Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2690 ES

1 SECTION 1. HARRY J. PARRISH POST OFFICE.

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

3 Postal Service located at 8801 Sudley Road, Manassas,

4 Virginia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Harry

5 J. Parrish Post Office’’.

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

9 be deemed to be a reference to the Harry J. Parrish Post

10 Office.

Passed the Senate July 20, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2690

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice’’. nassas, Virginia, as the ‘‘Harry J. Parrish Post al Service located at 8801 Sudley Road in Ma-
§ 760.27 Setoffs. ( a ) If the affected farmer or manufacturer is indebted to any agency of the United States and such indebtedness is listed on the county debt record, indemnity payments due the affected farmer or manufacturer under the regulations in this part shall be applied, as provided in the Secretary's setoff regulations, part 13 of this title, to such indebtedness.
( b ) Compliance with the provisions of this section shall not deprive the affected farmer or manufacturer of any right he would otherwise have to contest the justness of the indebtedness involved in the setoff action, either by administrative appeal or by legal action.
§ 765.251 General. ( a ) A borrower is required to be the operator of Agency security in accordance with loan purposes, loan agreements, and security instruments.
( b ) A borrower who fails to operate the security without Agency consent is in violation of loan agreements and security instruments.
( c ) The Agency will consider a borrower's request to lease or cease to operate the security as provided in §§ 765.252 and 765.253.
Exhibit
      13.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Rodman International
      Enterprise III, Ltd. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Kirk M. WarshawKirk
                M. Warshaw
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              June
                6, 2008
211.274-2 Policy for item unique

identification.

(a) It is DoD policy that DoD item unique identification, or a DoD recognized unique identification

equivalent, is required for all delivered items, including items of contractor-acquired property

delivered on contract line items (see PGI 245.402-71 for guidance when delivery of contractor

acquired property is required)—

(1) For which the Government’s unit acquisition cost is $5,000 or more;

(2) For which the Government’s unit acquisition cost is less than $5,000 when the requiring activity

determines that item unique identification is required for mission essential or controlled inventory

items; or

(3) Regardless of value for any—

(i) DoD serially managed item (reparable or nonreparable) or subassembly, component, or part

embedded within a subassembly, component, or part;

(ii) Parent item (as defined in 252.211-7003 (a)) that contains the embedded subassembly,

component, or part;

(iii) Warranted serialized item;

(iv) Item of special tooling or special test equipment, as defined at FAR 2.101, for a major defense

acquisition program that is designated for preservation and storage in accordance with the

requirements of section 815 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Pub. L.

110-417); and

(v) High risk item identified by the requiring activity as vulnerable to supply chain threat, a target of

cyber threats, or counterfeiting.

(b) Exceptions. The contractor will not be required to provide DoD item unique identification if—

(1) The items, as determined by the head of the contracting activity, are to be used to support a

contingency or humanitarian or peacekeeping operation; to facilitate defense against or recovery

from nuclear, biological, chemical, or radiological attack; to facilitate the provision of international

disaster assistance; or to support response to an emergency or major disaster; or

(2) A determination and findings has been executed concluding that it is more cost effective for the

Government requiring activity to assign, mark, and register the unique item identifier after delivery,

and the item is either acquired from a small business concern, or is a commercial product acquired

under FAR part 12 or part 8.

(i) The determination and findings shall be executed by—

(A) The Component Acquisition Executive for an acquisition category (ACAT) I program; or

(B) The head of the contracting activity for all other programs.
(ii) The DoD Unique Identification Policy Office must receive a copy of the determination and

findings required by paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this subsection. Follow the procedures at PGI 211.274-2 .

Parent topic: 211.274 Item identification and valuation requirements.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2953 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain men’s footwear covering the ankle 

with coated or laminated textile fabrics. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain men’s footwear 

covering the ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN’S FOOTWEAR COVERING THE 

4 ANKLE WITH COATED OR LAMINATED TEX5 TILE FABRICS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2953 IS 

‘‘ 9902.64.09 Men’s footwear, covering the 

ankle, valued over $20/pair 

designed to be worn over, or 

in lieu of, other footwear as 

a protection against water, 

oil, grease or chemicals or 

cold or inclement weather 

where such protection includes protection against 

water that is imparted by 

the use of a coated or laminated textile fabric (except 

footwear with waterproof injection molded bottoms, i.e. 

comprising a complete outer 

sole and all or part of the 

upper) (provided in subheading 6404.19.20) ............ 20% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
JONATHAN B. HILL

MEMBER

D 202/776-2725 E JHILL@DOWLOHNES.COM

DF 202/776-4725

March 5, 2013 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

 Re: Exemption Request from 14 CFR § 91.151(a) 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Trimble Navigation Limited (“Trimble”) has applied for two Special Airworthiness 

Certificates, Experimental, for an Unmanned Aircraft System (“UAS”) that it produces through 

its indirect subsidiary Gatewing N.V., a Belgium company. The Gatewing UAS will be 

registered in the name of Trimble, a U.S. company and a U.S. citizen. As part of the application 

process, Trimble is petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking for an 

additional exemption from the FARs, this time covering 14 CFR § 91.151.1

 Trimble notes that a 

similar exemption has been granted for another UAS. The X-100, the subject of the two SAC 

applications, has operated for over 370 hours without significant incident in Europe and other 

countries around the world. Relief from Part 91.151 would not result in any denigration to safety 

and would allow Trimble to conduct longer flights under any authority granted by the FAA in a 

Special Airworthiness Certificate-Experimental. 

 The name and address of the applicant is: 

Trimble Navigation Limited 

935 Stewart Drive 

Sunnyvale, California 94085-3919 

Attn: James Kirkland 

Ph:408-481-8930 

Fax:408-481-7780 

Email:jim_kirkland@trimble.com 

Trimble seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a). 

 

1

 The FAA granted Exemption 10700, in FAA docket 2012-1234, on February 8th for relief from 

the following FARs: 21.191(f); 21.195(a); 45.23(b); 91.9 (b) (s); and 91.203(a) and (b) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

*

vs * 2:06cr169-WHA

*

KOWOSKY TYWAN CHRISTIAN *

CHRISTOPHER IMAN ULMER *

DARRYL LAMONT BROWN **

JAMES CALVIN TALLEY *

WILMONT TIMOTHY BARNETT *

WITNESS LIST

GOVERNMENT DEFENDANT

1. Shane Mayfield 1. Stephanie Barnett

2. Debra Wright

3. Michael Deason

4. Darryl Brown

5. Jason Dillon

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 100-2 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
7 - 1

CHAPTER 7

AMVER

700A. Amver Participation Instructions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

700B. Communication Methods for Filing Amver Reports. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

700C. Special Warnings to Mariners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

700D. Amver Voyage Report Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**RESTATED OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certifythat:

1.        I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by thisreport on Form 10–K of Washington Mutual MortgagePass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2006-8 Trust(the ‘‘Exchange Act periodicreports’’);

2.        Based on my knowledge,the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a  material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

3.        Based on my knowledge,all of the distribution, servicing and other information requiredto be provided under Form 10–D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.        Based on my knowledgeand the servicer compliance statements required in this reportunder Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled theirobligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all materialrespects; and

5.        All of the reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesrequired to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties: None.

 

 

Date:  As of March 15,2007

|   |   | /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann                                                                        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  ThomasG. Lehmann                                                                 |
|   |   | Title:   President and Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramon Frank, Appellant.

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on January 16, 1979, dismissed. Judgment of resentence, of said court, rendered on January 7, 1980, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sandler, Ross, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report ofGolden Star Resource Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Kathrine MacDonald, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   



| | Dated this 28thday of September, 2007.
| | --------------------------------------

KATHRINE MACDONALDKathrine MacDonaldChief Financial Officer, Secretary/Treasurer and a member 
of the board of directors.













---
§ 63.300 Establishment. The NSIIC Revolving Fund established in the Treasury shall be available to the NSIIC, without fiscal year limitation, to carry out the authorized programs and activities of the NSIIC under this part. There shall be deposited in the Fund: ( a ) Such amounts as may be appropriated, transferred, or otherwise made available to support programs and activities of the NSIIC;
( b ) Payments received from any source for products, services, or property furnished in connection with the activities of the NSIIC;
( c ) Fees and royalties collected by the NSIIC from licensing or other arrangements relating to commercialization of products developed through projects funded, in whole or part, by grants or contracts executed by the NSIIC;
( d ) Donations or contributions accepted by the NSIIC to support authorized programs and activities. Such contributions shall be free from any encumbrance by the donor and the NSIIC shall retain complete control of their use; and
( e ) Any other funds acquired by the NSIIC.
Exhibit
13.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of Rodman International Enterprise II, Ltd.
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Arnold P. Kling,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                               | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Dated: June
 26, 2009          | 
|                               | 
|/s/ Arnold
 P. Kling           | 
|                               | 
|Arnold P.
 Kling               | 
|President                      | 
|(Principal
 Executive Officer) | 

A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 8 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 8 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 8 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 8 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 4 of 4
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2915 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve screening for colorectal 

cancer for TRICARE beneficiaries over the age of 50. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BIDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve screening 

for colorectal cancer for TRICARE beneficiaries over 

the age of 50. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENHANCEMENT OF COLORECTAL CANCER 

4 SCREENING FOR TRICARE BENEFICIARIES 

5 OVER AGE 50. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 1074d 

7 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at 

8 the end the following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(3) Members and former members of the uniformed 

10 services described in paragraph (1) or (2) who are 50 


bajohnson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
2 

•S 2915 IS

1 years of age or older shall also be entitled to the colorectal 

2 cancer screening tests described in section 1861(pp)(1) of 

3 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1935x(pp)(1)) with 

4 such frequency as tests for which payment would be au5 thorized under section 1834(d) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1935m(d)) without regard to whether such members or 

7 former members are at high risk for colorectal cancer (as 

8 described in section 1861(pp)(2) of that Act) or have oth9 erwise previously exhibited any symptom of or associated 

10 with colorectal cancer.’’. 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (b)(8) 

12 of such section is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (a)(2)’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (a)’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
#### § 81.17 Death, incompetency, or disappearance.

In the case of death, incompetency, disappearance, or dissolution of a prune/plum producer that is eligible to receive benefits in accordance with this part, such person or persons who would, under 7 CFR part 707 be eligible for payments and benefits covered by that part, may receive the tree-removal benefits otherwise due the actual producer.