75964 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Notices 

1As the 30-day extension falls on Sunday, 

January 30, 2011, the deadline for the preliminary 

results of review will be the next business day, 

which is January 31, 2011. 

Title III are found at 15 CFR Part 325 

(2010). 

The Office of Competition and 

Economic Analysis (‘‘OCEA’’) is issuing 

this notice pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b), 

which requires the Secretary of 

Commerce to publish a summary of the 

certification in the Federal Register. 

Under Section 305(a) of the Act and 15 

CFR 325.11(a), any person aggrieved by 

the Secretary’s determination may, 

within 30 days of the date of this notice, 

bring an action in any appropriate 

district court of the United States to set 

aside the determination on the ground 

that the determination is erroneous. 

Description of Amended Certificate 

AIA’s Export Trade Certificate of Review 

has been amended to 

1. Add the following new Members of 

the Certificate within the meaning of 

section 325.2(1) of the Regulations (15 

CFR 325.2(1)): 

Acutec Precision Manufacturing, Inc., 

Saegertown, PA; Airdat LLC, 

Morrisville, NC; Alcoa Defense, Crystal 

City, VA; Alliant Techsystems, Inc. 

(ATK), Minneapolis, MN; ANSYS, Inc., 

Canonsburg, PA; ArmorWorks 

Enterprises, LLC, Chandler, AZ; 

Bombardier, Montreal, Canada; Broad 

Reach Engineering Company, Golden, 

CO; Celestica Corporation, Toronto, 

Canada; Deloitte Consulting LLP, New 

York, NY; Guardsmark, LLC, New York, 

NY; Integral Systems, Inc., Columbia, 

MD; Jabil Defense & Aerospace Services 

LLC, St. Petersburg, FL; KPMG LLP, 

New York, NY; M7 Aerospace L.P., San 

Antonio, TX; Microsemi Corporation, 

Irvine, CA; OSI Systems, Inc., 

Hawthorne, CA; Pacifica Engineering, 

Inc., Mukiliteo, WA; Paragon Space 

Development Corporation, Tucson, AZ; 

Plexus Corporation, Neenah, WI; PWC 

Aerospace & Defense Advisory Services, 

McLean, VA; SAP Public Services, Inc., 

Washington, DC; SRA International, 

Inc., Fairfax, VA; Tech Manufacturing, 

LLC, Wright City, MO; Therm, 

Incorporated, Ithaca, NY; TIMCO 

Aviation Services, Inc., Greensboro, NC; 

Triumph Group Inc., Wayne, PA; UFC 

Aerospace, Bay Shore, NY; Vermont 

Composites, Inc., Bennington, VT; 

Xerox Corporation, Norwalk, CT. 

2. Make the following changes in 

name or address of existing Members: 

Accenture is now located in Chicago, 

IL, with controlling entity Accenture 

plc, Dublin, Ireland; AAR 

Manufacturing, Inc., Wood Dale, IL, is a 

Member in place of its controlling 

entity, AAR Corp., Wood Dale, IL; 

Barnes Group Inc., Bristol, CT, has 

replaced its subsidiary Barnes 

Aerospace, Windsor, CT, as the 

Member; Chromalloy Power Services 

Corporation, San Antonio, TX, has 

changed its name to Chromalloy (at the 

same location). The controlling entity 

remains the Carlyle Group, Washington, 

DC; Computer Sciences Corporation 

(CSC) moved from El Segundo, CA, to 

Falls Church, VA; Ducommon 

Incorporated moved from Long Beach, 

CA, to Carson, CA. Elbit Systems of 

America, LLC, Fort Worth, TX, the 

controlling entity of EFW Inc., Fort 

Worth, TX, has replaced EFW, Inc., as 

Member. The controlling entity of Elbit 

Systems of America, LLC, is Elbit 

Systems, Ltd., of Haifa, Israel. Electronic 

Data Systems Corporation, Plano, TX, 

has changed its name to HP Enterprise 

Services—Aerospace, Palo Alto, CA; 

General Electric Aviation, Cincinnati, 

OH, has replaced its controlling entity, 

General Electric Company, Fairfield, CT, 

as Member; Microsat Systems, Inc., 

Littleton, CO, has changed its name to 

Sierra Nevada Corporation, Space 

Systems, Littleton, CO; RTI 

International Materials Inc., has moved 

from Niles, OH, to Pittsburgh, PA; 

Science Applications International 

Corporation has moved from San Diego, 

CA, to McLean, VA; Sparton 

Corporation, Jackson, MI, has moved to 

Schaumburg, IL; Vought Aircraft 

Industries, Inc., Dallas, TX, has changed 

its name to Triumph Aerostructures— 

Vought Aircraft Division. The 

controlling entity is Triumph Group, 

Inc., Wayne, PA. 

Dated: December 1, 2010. 

Joseph E. Flynn, 

Director, Office of Competition and Economic 

Analysis. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30524 Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–875] 

Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 7, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karine Gziryan, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 4, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4081. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 28, 2010, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published 

the initiation of the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on non-malleable cast iron pipe fittings 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’). See Initiation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews, 75 FR 29976, 29983 (May 28, 

2010). The period of review is April 1, 

2009, through March 31, 2010. The 

preliminary results of this 

administrative review are currently due 

no later than December 31, 2010. 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results of Review 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), the Department shall make a 

preliminary determination in an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of the date of publication of the 

order. Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

further provides, however, that the 

Department may extend the 245-day 

period to 365 days if it determines it is 

not practicable to complete the review 

within the foregoing time period. 

The Department determines that it is 

not practicable to complete the 

administrative review of non-malleable 

cast iron pipe fittings from the PRC 

within the time limits mandated by 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act because 

this review involves examining a 

number of complex issues related to 

factors of production and surrogate 

values, as well as requesting and 

analyzing additional information from 

NEP Tianjin Machinery Company in a 

supplemental questionnaire. Therefore, 

we find that additional time is needed 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this administrative review. As a result, 

in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) 

of the Act, the Department is extending 

the time period for completion of the 

preliminary results of this 

administrative review, which is 

currently due on December 31, 2010, by 

30 days to January 30, 2011.1 The 

deadline for the final results of the 

review continues to be 120 after the 

publication of the preliminary results. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i) of the Act. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Notices 75965 

1 ‘‘Tails’’ in this context means the tail fan, which 

includes the telson and the uropods. 

Dated: November 30, 2010. 

Susan H. Kuhbach, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30666 Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–802] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Final Results of the First 

Five-year ‘‘Sunset’’ Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On January 4, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published the notice of 

initiation of the first sunset review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam 

(‘‘Vietnam’’). On the basis of the notices 

of intent to participate by domestic 

interested parties and adequate 

substantive responses filed on behalf of 

the domestic and respondent interested 

parties, the Department conducted a full 

sunset review of the antidumping duty 

order pursuant to section 751(c) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(2)(i). As a 

result of this sunset review, the 

Department finds that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order would likely 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at the levels listed below in 

the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of 

Review.’’ 

DATES: Effective Date: December 7, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry 

Huang, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: 202–482–4047. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 4, 2010, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

notice of initiation of its sunset reviews 

of the antidumping duty orders on 

certain frozen warmwater shrimp from 

Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, 

India, Thailand, and Vietnam, in 

accordance with section 751(c) of the 

Act. See Initiation of Five-Year 

(‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 75 FR 103 (January 4, 

2010) (‘‘Notice of Initiation’’). 

The Department received notices of 

intent to participate from domestic 

interested parties, the Ad Hoc Shrimp 

Trade Action Committee (‘‘AHSTAC’’), 

and the American Shrimp Processors 

Association (‘‘ASPA’’), within the 15-day 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i). The domestic 

interested parties claimed interested 

party status under section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act, as manufacturers of a domesticlike product in the United States. 

The Department received substantive 

responses to the Notice of Initiation 

from respondent interested parties 

(collectively ‘‘Vietnamese Respondents’’) 

and domestic interested parties within 

the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i). On February 12, 2010, 

Vietnamese Respondents and ASPA 

filed rebuttal comments to parties’ 

substantive responses. 

19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(A) provides 

that the Secretary normally will 

conclude that respondent interested 

parties have provided adequate 

response to a notice of initiation where 

the Department receives complete 

substantive responses from respondent 

interested parties accounting on average 

for more than 50 percent, by volume, or 

value, if appropriate, of the total exports 

of the subject merchandise to the United 

States over the five calendar years 

preceding the year of publication of the 

notice of initiation. On March 2, 2010, 

the Department determined that 

Vietnamese Respondents accounted for 

more than 50 percent of exports by 

volume of the subject merchandise and, 

therefore, submitted an adequate 

substantive response to the 

Department’s Notice of Initiation. See 

Memorandum to James C. Doyle: 

Adequacy Determination in 

Antidumping Duty Sunset Review of 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from 

the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, dated 

March 2, 2010. The Department also 

determined that domestic interested 

parties submitted an adequate response 

as at least one domestic interested party 

submitted a complete substantive 

response. See 19 CRF 351.218(e)(1)(i). In 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(2)(i), the Department 

determined to conduct a full sunset 

review of this antidumping duty order. 

On May 6, 2010, in accordance with 

section 751(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the 

Department extended the deadlines for 

the preliminary and final results of this 

sunset review by 90 days from the 

scheduled dates. See Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Extension of Time 

Limits for Preliminary and Final Results 

of Full Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of 

Antidumping Duty Order, 75 FR 24883 

(May 6, 2010). 

The Department published the 

preliminary results of this sunset review 

on August 6, 2010. See Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary 

Results of the First Five-year ‘‘Sunset’’ 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 

75 FR 47546 (August 6, 2010) 

(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). In the 

Preliminary Results, the Department 

found that revocation of the order 

would likely result in continuation or 

recurrence of dumping at margins found 

in the original investigation. 

On September 7, 2010, within the 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(1)(i), the Department 

received a case brief on behalf of 

Vietnamese Respondents. On September 

13, 2010, the Department received 

rebuttal briefs on behalf of AHSTAC and 

ASPA. 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of the order includes 

certain frozen warmwater shrimp and 

prawns, whether wild-caught (ocean 

harvested) or farm-raised (produced by 

aquaculture), head-on or head-off, shellon or peeled, tail-on or tail-off,1

deveined or not deveined, cooked or 

raw, or otherwise processed in frozen 

form. 

The frozen warmwater shrimp and 

prawn products included in the scope of 

the order, regardless of definitions in 

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’), are products 

which are processed from warmwater 

shrimp and prawns through freezing 

and which are sold in any count size. 

The products described above may be 

processed from any species of 

warmwater shrimp and prawns. 

Warmwater shrimp and prawns are 

generally classified in, but are not 

limited to, the Penaeidae family. Some 

examples of the farmed and wild-caught 

warmwater species include, but are not 

limited to, whiteleg shrimp (Penaeus 

vannemei), banana prawn (Penaeus 

merguiensis), fleshy prawn (Penaeus 

chinensis), giant river prawn 

(Macrobrachium rosenbergii), giant tiger 

prawn (Penaeus monodon), redspotted 

shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis), southern 

brown shrimp (Penaeus subtilis), 

southern pink shrimp (Penaeus 

notialis), southern rough shrimp 

(Trachypenaeus curvirostris), southern 

white shrimp (Penaeus schmitti), blue 

shrimp (Penaeus stylirostris), western 

white shrimp (Penaeus occidentalis), 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES