alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Angelo M. Surico et al., Respondents, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Seymour Friedman, Appellant.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating appellant as a candidate in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 23, 1970 for nomination for the public office of Member of the House of Representatives for the 7th Congressional District, Queens County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 11, 1970, which invalidated said designating petitions. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
SERVED: AUGUST 25, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF B 

### & G INDUSTRIES, LLC DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-2442 (Civil Penalty Action)


### NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING - _ _:.'

This proceeding (heretofore designated·as Case No. 2013NM910238) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

### Karl Bertagnole, President B & 

### G Industries, LLC, Respondent 

### PO Box 669 Greybull, WY 82426 TEL: 307-765-9911 Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

### Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave., S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847**F~:** 

### 425-227-1007 ONE COPY



### Hon. J

### .E. Sullivan,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941**F~:** 

### 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-20 15-2442 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430. 

### -2-
# 52.203-1 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.203 [Reserved]
§ 51.1403 U.S. Standard. “U.S. Standard” consists of pecans in the shell which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Free from loose extraneous or foreign material;
( b ) Kernels well cured;
( c ) Moisture content shall be not more than 6 percent, unless otherwise specified;
( d ) No requirement for fullness of kernel;
( e ) No requirement for uniformity of color of shells or kernels;
( f ) May contain kernels that are “dark amber” or darker, unless specified to a lighter color classification; and
( g ) Shells and kernels are free from damage by any cause.
( h ) For tolerances see § 51.1406.
**Exhibit 35.2**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, Barbara Campbell, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “AdministrativeAgent”), do hereby certify to WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”) and Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Administrative Agent Agreement dated as of April 1, 2006 (the “ServicingAgreement”) by and between the Servicer and the Administrative Agent the following with respect to Washington Mutual Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2006-HE3 Trust for the 2006 fiscal year (the “Relevant Year”):

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

Dated as of March 1, 2007.

 
|  

__/s/ Barbara Campbell________________

Name:  Barbara Campbell

Title:    First Vice President |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Wes Consulting, Inc. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wes Consulting, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007. The undersigned certify that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Wes Consulting, Inc. as of December 31, 2007. This Certification is executed as of February 17, 2009. By:   
/s/SANFORD H. BARBER Sanford H. Barber
President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer)  By:   /s/SANFORD
H. BARBER
Sanford H. Barber
Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wes Consulting, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
47.305-15 Loading responsibilities of contractors.       (a)                                                         (1) 								                Contractors are responsible for loading, blocking, and bracing carload shipments as specified in standards published by the Association of American Railroads.                                                            (2) 								                The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at 52.247-58, Loading, Blocking, and Bracing of Freight Car Shipments, when supplies may be shipped in carload lots by rail.                                                                             (b) 						            If the nature of the supplies or safety, environmental, or transportability factors require special methods for securing the supplies on the carrier’s equipment, or if only a special mode of transportation or type vehicle is appropriate, the contracting officer shall include in solicitations detailed specifications that have been coordinated with the transportation office.    **Parent topic:** 47.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
NUMBER 13-16-00471-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE JESUS HECTOR TORRES LEDEZMA

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator Jesus Hector Torres Ledezma filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the 

above cause on August 23, 2016, seeking to compel the trial court to provide him with 

“an informal competency hearing based on linguistic competency.” The Court requested 

and received a response to the petition for writ of mandamus from the real party in 

interest, the State of Texas acting by and through the District Attorney of Cameron 

County, Texas.

 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

To be entitled to mandamus relief, the relator must establish both that he has no 

adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and that what he seeks to compel 

is a purely ministerial act not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. In re Harris, 

491 S.W.3d 332, 334 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (orig. proceeding); In re McCann, 422 

S.W.3d 701, 704 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). If the relator fails to meet 

both of these requirements, then the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. 

State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Jud. Dist. Ct. of Apps. at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2007). 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, 

the response, and the applicable law, is of the opinion that the relator has not met his 

burden to obtain mandamus relief. See State ex rel. Young, 236 S.W.3d at 210. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and all relief sought therein. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We dismiss relator's motion for leave to file his petition for writ of 

mandamus as moot. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure no longer require the 

relator to file a motion for leave to file an original proceeding. See generally TEX. R. APP.

P. 52 & cmt.; In re Kellum, 307 S.W.3d 336 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, orig. 

proceeding).

 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed this 

6th day of September, 2016.
Exhibit 35.1

                                                          [LOGO] IndymacBank(SM)


                       REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance

I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transaction listed below and I certify:

a)    A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of
      its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
      under my supervision.

b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth
      below IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

c)    None


                                By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
                                    ----------------------
                                    Robert M. Abramian
                                    First Vice President
                                    Home Loan Servicing
                                    Investor Reporting
                                    Indymac Bank


                                By: /s/ Barbara Perez
                                    ----------------------
                                    Barbara Perez
                                    Senior Vice President
                                    Indymac Bank



Prepared for:   Deutsche Bank

Date:           February 28, 2007

Ref:            698 - RAST 2006-A11



                                                             www.indymacbank.com


             460 Sierra Madre Villa Ave., Pasadena, CA 91107   Tel: 626.535.5555
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No.: 2:06-cv-618-MEF 

 ) 

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., ) 

et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

NOTICE OF FILING

COMES NOW the Defendant, Southern Energy Homes, Inc., and pursuant to this Court’s 

Order of July 5, 2007, hereby files a true and correct copy of correspondence from the U. S. 

Department of Housing and Urban Development, along with an authentication certification in 

compliance with FED.R.EVID. 902(2). The original documents are maintained by the undersigned 

and may be provided to the Court or other parties upon reasonable notice. 

 /s/ W. Scott Simpson

W. Scott Simpson 

Attorney for Defendant 

Southern Energy Homes, Inc. 

OF COUNSEL: 

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC 

3288 Morgan Drive, Suite 100 

Birmingham, Alabama 35216 

Telephone: 205-876-1600 

Facsimile: 205-876-1616 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 49 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Παγε 2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on the 9th day of July, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the 

following: 

• Charles Lance Gould

lance.gould@beasleyallen.com holly.stroh@beasleyallen.com 

• Carter Gibson Vance

gibson.vance@beasleyallen.com heidi.bowers@beasleyallen.com 

 /s/ W. Scott Simpson 

 Of Counsel 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 49 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

BRANDON TERRELL RAMSEY,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 5:20cv302/TKW/EMT

RICKY D. DIXON,

Respondent.

__________________________/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 33) and Petitioner’s objections (Doc. 38). I reviewed the 

issues raised in the objections de novo as required by 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), and based on that review, I fully agree with the magistrate 

judge’s analysis and recommended disposition of this case. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 10) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this order and close 

the case file.

Case 5:20-cv-00302-TKW-EMT Document 39 Filed 04/11/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:20cv302/TKW/EMT

DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of April, 2022.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00302-TKW-EMT Document 39 Filed 04/11/22 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2874 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2874

 To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethyl 4,5-dihydro-5,5-diphenyl-1,2-
               oxazole-3-carboxylate (Isoxadifen-ethyl).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethyl 4,5-dihydro-5,5-diphenyl-1,2-
               oxazole-3-carboxylate (Isoxadifen-ethyl).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHYL 4,5-DIHYDRO-5,5-DIPHENYL-1,2-OXAZOLE-3-CARBOXYLATE 
              (ISOXADIFEN-ETHYL).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.11.45       Ethyl 4,5-dihydro- Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         5,5-diphenyl-1,2-                                                  31/2009
                         oxazole-3-
                         carboxylate
                         (Isoxadifen-
                         ethyl) (CAS No.
                         163520-33-0)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2934.99.39)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 65.145 Ginseng.

*Ginseng* means ginseng root of the genus Panax.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

EDGAR ZUNIGA-MEJIA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-258-RV/MJF

FILIPCZACK, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated March 16, 2021 (ECF No. 10). The parties have been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that 

the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 5:20-cv-00258-RV-MJF Document 11 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

5:20-cv-258-RV/MJF

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 1915A(b)(1) for maliciousness and abuse of the judicial

process.

3. The clerk of the court shall close the case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of April 2021.

s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00258-RV-MJF Document 11 Filed 04/21/21 Page 2 of 2
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 

2104 Jolly Road, Suite 200, Okemos, Ml 48864 

(517) 706-0001 Fax (517) 706-0282 

Februaryl?, 2012 

Docket Management Facility [^~' 

U.S. Department of Transportation |_J 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., -o 

West Building Grand Floor, Room W12-140 ~* 

Washington, DC 20590 n 

"?^'c:5!:'1 

Ref: Sun Country Slot Exemption - Docket Number FAA 2012-0089 " • : 

Ladies and Gentlemen: _o 

Sun Country Airlines has requested an exemption from the slot limit for Ronald Reagan 

Washington National Airport (DCA) to permit the FAA to create air carrier slots during certain 

limited hour for Sun Country's use. The proposed air carriers slots would replace two slot 

exemptions under DOT Order 2010-12-16 awarded to Sun Country. 

On January 6, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals vacated the DOT Order, and Sun Country may 

lose its existing service between DCA and Lansing's Capital Region International Airport. 

Specifically, Sun Country desires one daily slot during each of the 1000 and 1100 hours. The 

proposed exemption would permit Sun Country to continue operating its existing services and 

avoid an inequitable result of the Court's order. 

I have personally enjoyed the Sun Country LAN-DCA flight several times and can testify this 

non-stop air service is great for the people of Michigan. Passengers from throughout the state 

travel to Lansing to fly non-stop on Sun Country to DCA for business or pleasure, saving 

millions of dollars in excessive airline fares offered by other carriers. The FAA made the right 

decision to grant a DCA slot to Sun Country as a new, low-fare carrier to a greatly underserved 

market. 

The Sun Country DCA service is essential to the future economic growth of the Greater Lansing 

Region. The daily service is the only large aircraft service to Washington Reagan Airport in the 

state of Michigan outside of Detroit. Prior to Sun Country, the regional community had 

requested the introduction of this service from numerous other airline operators without success. 

It is critical the FAA take the necessary steps to ensure the continuation of the Sun Country slots 

at the established flight times in support of Greater Lansing's business and economic growth. 

Your immediate approval of this exemption, so that Sun Country can begin to enter flight 

schedules for sale for the balance of 2012, will be greatly appreciated. 

Sincerely 

Robert Kolt 

President/CEO 

RK/mf
# L_2014070EN.01001001.xml

| 11.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 70/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 70/10

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 225/2014

of 28 February 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Höri Bülle (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Höri Bülle’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Höri Bülle’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Höri Bülle’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Höri Bülle’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 February 2014.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 293, 9.10.2013, p. 16.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

GERMANY

Höri Bülle (PGI)

---
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 181-2 Filed 04/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,225,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,700
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      10,443,200
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,832,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,406,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          342,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,406,900
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,940,200
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,217,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (160,700)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                26,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                872,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            872,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   872,700
<EPS-BASIC>                                      28.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>