alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bond Laboratories, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K /A for the period ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John
Wilson , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







BOND LABORATORIES, INC


By /s/ John Wilson


John Wilson


Chief Executive Officer, President


June 3, 2010
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Presidential Documents 75865 

Presidential Determination No. 2011–05 of November 19, 2010 

Presidential Determination on Sudan 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and the] President of the ExportImport Bank of the United States 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 908(a)(3) of the 

Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000, title IX, 

Public Law 106–387, as amended, 22 U.S.C. 7207(a)(3) (TSRA), I hereby 

determine it is in the national security interest of the United States to 

waive the application of section 908(a)(1) of TSRA to allow export assistance 

to be made available for the export of computers and related equipment 

that enables the United Nations to facilitate the referendum in Southern 

Sudan pursuant to the Comprehensive Peace Agreement. 

The Secretary of State is hereby authorized and directed to publish this 

determination in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, November 19, 2010 

[FR Doc. 2010–30831 

Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HANNAH ISAACS,

Plaintiff.

v. Case No.: 4:20cv471-MW/MJF

RON DESANTIS,

Defendant.

_____________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation, ECF No. 10. Upon consideration, with no objections having 

been filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “This action is DISMISSED for

failure to comply with two orders of this court and for failure to pay the filing fee.” 

The Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on March 24, 2021.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00471-MW-MJF Document 11 Filed 03/24/21 Page 1 of 2
2

Case 4:20-cv-00471-MW-MJF Document 11 Filed 03/24/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JODIE MILLER, 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:03cv318-LC/WCS

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This case is before the court upon Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss complaint. The

Defendant does not oppose the motion. Doc. 44. 

It is therefore RECOMMENDED that the motion to dismiss be GRANTED and

the clerk be directed to enter judgment of dismissal pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2).

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on June 7, 2007.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

Case 5:03-cv-00318-LC-WCS Document 45 Filed 06/07/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:03cv318-LC/WCS

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10

days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections

limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case 5:03-cv-00318-LC-WCS Document 45 Filed 06/07/07 Page 2 of 2
#### § 54.1010 When request for service deemed made.

A request for service under the regulations shall be deemed to be made when received by the Branch. Records showing the date and time of the request shall be maintained.
exv4w1




Exhibit 4.1


	



	Exhibit 4.1




	DGI 2805 DIGITALGLOBE




	COMMON STOCK incorporated under the laws of the state of delaware SEE REVERSE FOR
certain DEFINITIONS AND INFORMATION CONCERNING CERT CUSIP 25389m 10 9




	THIS CERTIFIES THAT SPECIMEN




	IS The owner of
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE PAR VALUE OF $.001 EACH OF THE COMMON
STOCK OF




	DigitalGlobe, Inc.




	transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly
authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed or assigned.




	A statement of the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed upon
the respective classes or series of shares of stock of the Corporation and upon holders thereof




	as established by the Certificate of Incorporation or by any Certificate of Designation of
Preferences, and the number of shares constituting each series and the designations thereof, may




	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized
officers, and its facsimile seal to be be hereunto affixed.




	Dated




	SECRETARY            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




	COUNTERSIGNED AND
REGISTERED:




	AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY




	TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR




	AUTHORIZED OFFICER






 









 




	



	The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be
construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:




	TEN COM —as tenant in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- (Cust) Custodian (Minor)
UNIF TRAN MIN ACT- (Cust) Custodian (Minor)




	TEN ENT —as tenants by the entireties




	JT TEN -as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in
common under Uniform Gifts to Minors under Uniform Gifts to Minors




	Act (State) Act (State)




	Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.




	For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto




	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL
SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF
ASSIGNEE




	(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)




	shares of the capital stock represented by the within certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named
Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.




	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE
NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY
PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE
WHATEVER.




	SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:




	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE
GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND
LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN
APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT
TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.




	KEEP THIS CERTIFICATE IN A SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS LOST, STOLEN, MUTILATED OR DESTROYED,
THE CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND OF INDEMNITY AS A CONDITION TO THE ISSUANCE OF A
REPLACEMENT CERTIFICATE.
§ 58.810 Temperature requirements. ( a ) Unless processed within 2 hours, all whey or condensed whey, except acid type whey with a titratable acidity of 0.40 percent or above, or a pH of 4.6 or below, shall be cooled to 45 °F or less, or heated to 145 °F or higher. Other temperatures may be used when essential for the technology of the process, such as lactose crystallization and membrane whey separation processes, when the quality and wholesomeness of the product is not impaired.
( b ) Recording thermometers shall be required and so located to assure that the cooling or heating requirements in paragraph (a) of this section are met.
1/1524872.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

DAVID FINNEY, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER: 3:06-cv-622 

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

 In accordance with the Court’s Order of November 13, 2006, Takata U.S.A. 

Corporation, Takata Seat Belts Inc., Takata Restraint Systems Inc., Takata North 

American Inc., and Takata Inc. state in response to the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave of Court to 

File First Amended Complaint that, while they dispute the allegations in Plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint, they do not oppose Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the Complaint. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Charles A. Stewart III _____________ 

Charles A. Stewart III (STE067) 

Angela R. Rogers (RAI017) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

The Alabama Center for Commerce 

401 Adams Avenue, Suite 780 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

Telephone: (334) 956-7700 

Facsimile: (334) 956-7701 

Attorneys for the Takata entities 

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 29 Filed 11/21/2006 Page 1 of 3
1/1524872.1 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 21, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the 

following: 

Joel Lee DiLorenzo 

Jackson and Tucker, PC 

Black Diamond Building 

2229 First Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

Email: joel@ksjpc.com

Joseph Luther Tucker 

Jackson and Tucker, P.C. 

2229 1st Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

Email: josh@jacksonandtucker.com

Kenneth S Jackson 

Jackson and Tucker, P.C. 

Black Diamond Building 

2229 1st Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

Email: steve@jacksonandtucker.com

Walter B. Calton 

Calton & Rutland LLC 

Post Office Box 696 

Eufaula, AL 36027-0696 

Email: wcalton@bellsouth.net

Robert C Khayat, Jr. 

King & Spalding LLP 

1180 Peachtree St, NE 

Atlanta, AL 30309 

Email: rkhayat@kslaw.com

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the document to the 

following non-CM/ECF participants: None. 

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 29 Filed 11/21/2006 Page 2 of 3
1/1524872.1 3

s/ Charles A. Stewart III 

Charles A. Stewart III (asb-4955-a56c) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

The Alabama Center for Commerce 

401 Adams Avenue, Suite 780 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

Telephone: (334) 956-7700 

Facsimile: (334) 956-7701 

E-mail: cstewart@bradleyarant.com 

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 29 Filed 11/21/2006 Page 3 of 3
52.234-3 Notice of Earned Value

Management System-Post Award Postaward

Integrated Baseline Review.

As prescribed in 34.203 (b) use the following provision:

Notice of Earned Value Management System-Post Award Postaward Integrated Baseline Review

(Nov 2016)

(a) The offeror shall provide documentation that the Cognizant Federal Agency has determined that

the proposed earned value management system (EVMS) complies with the EVMS guidelines in

Electronic Industries Alliance Standard 748 (EIA-748) (current version at time of solicitation).

(b) If the offeror proposes to use a system that has not been determined to be in compliance with the

requirements of paragraph (a) of this provision, the offeror shall submit a comprehensive plan for

compliance with the EVMS guidelines.

(1) The plan shall-

(i) Describe the EVMS the offeror intends to use in performance of the contracts;

(ii) Distinguish between the offeror’s existing management system and modifications proposed to

meet the guidelines;

(iii) Describe the management system and its application in terms of the EVMS guidelines;

(iv) Describe the proposed procedure for administration of the guidelines, as applied to

subcontractors; and

(v) Provide documentation describing the process and results of any third-party or self-evaluation of

the system’s compliance with the EVMS guidelines.

(2) The offeror shall provide information and assistance as required by the Contracting Officer to

support review of the plan

(3) The Government will review and approve the offeror’s plan for an EVMS before contract award.

(4) The offeror’s EVMS plan must provide milestones that indicate when the offeror anticipates that

the EVM system will be compliant with the EIA-748 guidelines.

(c) Offerors shall identify the major subcontractors, or major subcontracted effort if major

subcontractors have not been selected, planned for application of the guidelines. The prime

Contractor and the Government shall agree to subcontractors selected for application of the EVMS

guidelines.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.234 [Reserved]
# 213.305 Imprest funds and third party drafts.

- 213.305-3 Conditions for use. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 213.3 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION METHODS
47.207-9 Annotation and distribution of

shipping and billing documents.

(a) The contracting officer shall state in detail the responsibilities of the contractor, the contracting

agency, and, if appropriate, the consignee for the annotation and distribution of shipping and billing

documents. See 41 CFR part 102-118, Transportation Payment and Audit.

(b) In instances of mass movements of freight made available to the contractor at one time, it is

particularly important that the contracting officer specifies that bills of lading be cross-referenced so

that the Government benefits from applicable volume rates.

(c) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-28, Contractor’s Invoices, in drayage or

other term contracts.

Parent topic: 47.207 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and special requirements.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 26, 2021

NO. 03

- 19

- 00548

- CV

Byron Harper , Appellant

v.

PJC Air Conditioning and Plumbing, LLC

d/b/a Rabroker Air Conditioning & Plumbing , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 169TH DI STRIC T COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

REVERSED AND REMANDED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the order granting summary judgment signed by t he tr i a l court on July 31,

2019 . Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was

reversible error in the court’s order

. The trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor

of Rab roker. The C ourt reverse s the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of

Rabroker and remand s the ca se to the trial court for further proceedings. The a ppell ee shall pay

all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court an d in the court below.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, William J. Gervais, Chief Executive Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated: May 11, 2011
By:
/s/ WILLIAM J. GERVAISWilliam J. GervaisPrincipal Executive Officer
1

 This deadline is extended for all defendants, not just those filing motions to extend. 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr169-WKW

)

DEMETRIOUS TERRELL PEGUES, )

et al., )

ORDER

Upon consideration of defendants' motions to extend pretrial motions deadlines (Doc.

# # 130 (filed March 16, 2007); 132 (filed March 19, 2007); 135 (filed March 19, 2007); 136

(filed March 19, 2007); 138 (filed March 19, 2007); 139 (filed March 19, 2007); 140 (filed

March 20, 2007); 141 (filed March 20, 2007); 144 (filed March 20, 2007); 146 (filed March

26, 2007); 148 (filed March 26, 2007); 151 (filed March 26, 2007)), and for good cause, it

is

ORDERED that the motions are granted to the extent that defendants’ pretrial motions

shall be filed on or before May 2, 2007.1

DONE, this 28th day of March, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 156 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

v. * Case No.: 3:06-cv-618-MEF 

 * 

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., et al., * 

 * 

 Defendants. * 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

 Comes now W. Scott Simpson and enters this Notice of Appearance as additional counsel 

on behalf of Defendant Southern Energy Homes, Inc. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s W. Scott Simpson 

 W. Scott Simpson (ASB-3319-S65W) 

 Batchelor & Simpson, P.C. 

 3284 Morgan Drive, Suite 112 

 Birmingham, Alabama 35216 

 Email: ws.simpson@mindspring.com 

 Robert D. Segall (ASB-7354-E68R) 

 Lee H. Copeland (ASB-3461-O72L) 

 Mitchel H. Boles (ASB-0813-S69M) 

 Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, P.A. 

444 South Perry Street 

P. O. Box 347 

Montgomery, AL 36101-0347

Phone: 334/834-1180 

Facsimile: 334/834-3172 

Email: segall@copelandfranco.com

Email: copeland@copelandfranco.com

Email: boles@copelandfranco.com

Attorney for Southern Energy Homes, Inc. 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 21 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on 20th of December, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to 

the following: 

• Charles Lance Gould

lance.gould@beasleyallen.com holly.stroh@beasleyallen.com 

• Carter Gibson Vance

gibson.vance@beasleyallen.com heidi.bowers@beasleyallen.com 

 W. Scott Simpson 

 Of Counsel 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 21 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 2 of 2
PUBLIC LAW 107–242—OCT. 16, 2002 116 STAT. 1497

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3838:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107–570 (Comm. on the Judiciary).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

July 15, considered and passed House.

Oct. 2, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–242

107th Congress

An Act

To amend the charter of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States organization to make members of the armed forces who receive special pay for duty

subject to hostile fire or imminent danger eligible for membership in the organization, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE

UNITED STATES CHARTER.

(a) ELIGIBILITY FOR MEMBERSHIP OF INDIVIDUALS RECEIVING

SPECIAL PAY FOR DUTY SUBJECT TO HOSTILE FIRE OR IMMINENT

DANGER.—Section 230103 of title 36, United States Code, is

amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph (1);

(2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (2)

and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

‘‘(3) in an area which entitled the individual to receive

special pay for duty subject to hostile fire or imminent danger

under section 310 of title 37.’’.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PURPOSES OF THE CORPORATION.

Section 230102 of such title is amended in the matter preceding

paragraph (1) by inserting ‘‘charitable,’’ before ‘‘and educational,’’.

Approved October 16, 2002.

Oct. 16, 2002

[H.R. 3838]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

h0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

145243

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145243

COA: 308015

Jackson CC: 11

- 004183

- FH

MICHAEL ANTHONY LOONEY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2012 order

of the Cou rt of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 3 of 3
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN IN RE SKANSKA USA

CIVIL SOUTHEAST INC. AND

SKANSKA USA, INC., AS

OWNERS OF THE BARGE KS ADMIRALTY RULE 9(H)

5531 PRAYING FOR

EXONERATION FROM OR Case No.: 3:20cv5980/LAC/HTC

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 

___________________________________/

ORDER

Before the Court is Skanska Usa Civil Southeast Inc. and Skanska Usa, Inc.’s

(“Skanska”) “Motion to Defer Payment of Monetary Sanctions until Issuance of

Interlocutory Decree on Liability, Or, in the Alternative, Motion to Approve

Supersedeas Bond to Stay Execution Of Monetary Sanctions Order Pending Appeal”

(ECF No. 1325). Claimants filed a response in opposition to the motion, which

includes a Motion for Entry of Judgment on Monetary Sanctions Award (ECF No.

1338). The Court notes that an interlocutory appeal (ECF No. 1326) has been filed

against the Court’s Order that imposed the sanctions at hand.

Skanska’s motion is GRANTED only to the extent that the Court approvesthe

Civil Supersedeas Bond, contingent upon Skanska filing an amended bond that

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1344 Filed 11/15/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

strikes the following statement, appearing on Page Two: “In no event shall the

surety’s liability exceed the total bond amount of $101,650.96.”

Claimants’ motion for entry of judgment is DENIED without prejudice. 

ORDERED on this 15th day of November, 2021.

 s/L.A. Collier 

Lacey A. Collier

Senior United States District Judge

Case No.: 3:20cv5980/LAC/HTC

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1344 Filed 11/15/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:97-cr-000011-MP-AK

RODERICK LEANDER DAWSON,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 490, Motion for Reconsideration, filed by

Defendant Roderick Dawson, which seeks reconsideration of the order denying Defendant’s

motion to reduce his sentence. Defendant argues that under the amended Guidelines, his offense

level should be decreased on account of the weight of drugs attributable to him. Contrary to

Defendant’s claim, he was found responsible for 666.5 grams of cocaine base, which does not

change his offense level. Because no change in Defendant’s Total Offense Level resulted from

the amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines, the Court finds that no reduction is warranted. 

Therefore, Defendant’s motion for reconsideration is denied. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of June, 2008

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:97-cr-00011-MP Document 492 Filed 06/16/08 Page 1 of 1