alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
12/03/2012 07:38 4252271007 ANM7 PAGE 02/03

1 ROBERT SPITZER 2 

### P AA 0FFJC8 OF REGlONAL COUNSEL 3 1601 LIND AVE., SW 4 RENTON. WASHINGTON98057 5 TELEPHONE: 425/227-1417 6 FACSIMILE: 425/227-1007 7 8 9 :l.O ll 12 13 H 15 H 17 18 l.9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 :27 

### UNITED 

### STATES OF 

### AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Inthe Matter of: Sky West Airlines, Inc. FAA DOCKET Not Assigned FAA Case No. 2011NM060047 

### FDMS Nos.**FAA~2012-0872** Judge Richard C. Goodwin



### NOTICE OF APPEARANCE i**~** ,, !,;

28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 so 5l 52 53 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney hereby enters hi.s Notice of Appearance and directs that all correspondence be sent to:

Robert Spitzer Office 

### ofRegion.al Counsel Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenu.e S W Renton, W A 98057**Pho1:~e:** (425) 227-1417 Facsimile: (425) 227-1007

DATED this 3rd day ofDecember, 2012. Respectfully submitted:

Robert Spitzer AttOr.t."ley Federal Aviati.on Administration 

### n ".,.£

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Skywest Airlines- 20l1NM060047. F.AA-20 1.2-087:2 P.age 1 of2 ROEIE.R.t S:P1TZ.F.:R, fAAATTORNEY TEL: 425.227.1417: FAX: 425.227.1007 ?). 

### l -) '• ;(.;..· 

### ,.,12/03/2012 07:38 4252271007 ANM7 PAGE 03/03

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g :LO 11 12 J.3 14 15 l6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28**2~** 30 31 32 33 34. 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 4.5 46 47 49 49 50 51 52 53 

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify

### thatthe foregoing Motion to Consolidatehas been served viafacshnile 

### and ce1tifi.ed mail

- 

### Return Receipt Requested 

### this date, to the following:

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Office of**Hearings~** 

### M-20 1200 New Jersey A**venue~** 

### S.E. East Building Ground Floor, Rm 

### El2-320 Washington, 

### D.C. 20590 TEL: (202)**366~2139'** 

### FAX: (202) 366-7536

Attn: Hearing Docket**Clerk~** 

### AGC-430 Wl.lbur Wright 

### Building

- Suite 2Wl000 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 

### Independence Ave. SW. 

### Washington, DC 20591 FAX; (202)**493~5142** 

### Todd Emerson, Esq. SkyWest Airlines 444 S. River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: (435)**634~3530** 

### FAX: (435) 634-3505

DATED this 

### 3r<1 dayofDecember, 

### 2012. 

# g.

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

# ~~~ TERRIKIRK 7 Office ofRegional Couh.sel (ANM-7) Federal Aviation Administration 1601 

### Lind Ave. SW Renton, W A 98057 

### (425)**227~2007**

Sl.'}rwest Airlines- 20llNM060047, FAA-2012-0872 Page 2 of2 ROBERT SPITZER, FAA ATTORNEY TEL: 425.227.1417: FAX! 425.227.1007
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 2 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 2 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 2 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 3 of 3
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00283-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.M. AND J.M.,

CHILDREN

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 323rd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (323-104781-17)

December 6, 2018

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
#### § 51.14 Order of inspection service.

Inspection service shall be performed, insofar as practicable, in the order of which applications are received, except that precedence shall be given (a) to the inspection of lots involved in complaints filed pursuant to the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930 (U.S.C. 449a *et seq.*), and (b) to appeal inspections. Precedence may also be given to applications made on behalf of the Federal or State Government.
47.305-16 Shipping characteristics.

(a) Required shipping weights. The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the

clause at 52.247-59, F.o.b. Origin-Carload and Truckload Shipments, when it is contemplated that

they may result in f.o.b. origin contracts with shipments in carloads or truckloads. This will facilitate

realistic freight cost evaluations of offers and ensure that contractors produce economical shipments

of agreed size.

(b) Guaranteed shipping characteristics.

(1) The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts, excluding those at or below the

simplified acquisition threshold, the clause at 52.247-60, Guaranteed Shipping Characteristics, when

shipping and other characteristics are required to evaluate offers as to transportation costs. When

all of the shipping characteristics listed in paragraph (a) of the clause at 52.247-60 are not required

to evaluate offers as to transportation costs, the contracting officer shall delete the characteristics

not required from the clause.

(2) The award document shall show the shipping characteristics used in the evaluation.

(c) Minimum size of shipments. When volume rates may apply, the contracting officer shall insert in

solicitations and contracts the clause at 52.247-61, F.o.b. Origin-Minimum Size of Shipments.

(d) Specific quantities unknown.

(1) When total requirements and destinations to which shipments will be made are known, but the

specific quantity to be shipped to each destination cannot be predetermined, solicitations shall state

that offers are to be submitted on the basis of delivery "f.o.b. origin" and/or "f.o.b. destination" and

that offers will be evaluated on both bases.

(2) The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at 52.247-62, Specific

Quantities Unknown, when total requirements and destinations to which shipments will be made are

known, but the specific quantity to be shipped to each destination cannot be predetermined. This

clause protects the interests of both the Government and the contractor during the course of the

performance of the contract.

Parent topic: 47.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
52.204-6 Unique Entity Identifier.

As prescribed in 4.607(b), insert the following provision:

Unique Entity Identifier (Oct 2016)

(a) Definition. As used in this provisionElectronic Funds Transfer (EFT) indicator means a four-character suffix to the unique entity

identifier. The suffix is assigned at the discretion of the commercial, nonprofit, or Government entity

to establish additional System for Award Management records for identifying alternative EFT

accounts (see subpart 32.11) for the same entity.

Unique entity identifier means a number or other identifier used to identify a specific commercial,

nonprofit, or Government entity. See www.sam.gov for the designated entity for establishing unique

entity identifiers.

(b) The Offeror shall enter, in the block with its name and address on the cover page of its offer, the

annotation "Unique Entity Identifier" followed by the unique entity identifier that identifies the

Offeror's name and address exactly as stated in the offer. The Offeror also shall enter its EFT

indicator, if applicable.

(c) If the Offeror does not have a unique entity identifier, it should contact the entity designated at

www.sam.gov for establishment of the unique entity identifier directly to obtain one. The Offeror

should be prepared to provide the following information:

(1) Company legal business name.

(2) Tradestyle, doing business, or other name by which your entity is commonly recognized.

(3) Company physical street address, city, state and Zip Code.

(4) Company mailing address, city, state and Zip Code (if separate from physical).

(5) Company telephone number.

(6) Date the company was started.

(7) Number of employees at your location.

(8) Chief executive officer/key manager.

(9) Line of business (industry).

(10) Company headquarters name and address (reporting relationship within your entity).

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.204 [Reserved]
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 13-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 8 of 8
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6525

MEDAD EL MUHAMMAD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Vi rginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-1307-1) Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 25, 2005 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Medad El Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Medad El Muhammad, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Muhammad has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motions for appointment of counsel and for a certificate of appealability, and we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
#### Alan M. Miller, Respondent, v Student Association of the State University of New York at Albany, Appellant.

In an action on a contract, defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 15, 1979, as denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Defendant, an unincorporated association, cross-moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it is being sued as a legal entity rather than by its president or treasurer. Special Term found that the defendant association has made a general appearance in the action, that the summons and complaint were served upon the president of the association and that the defendant was fairly apprised that its president is the party the action is intended to affect. In light of these findings, the failure to designate the president in his representative capacity as the defendant is an irregularity which may be corrected in the absence of prejudice to a right of any party. (See *Matter of Motor Haulage Co. [Teamsters’ Union],*298 NY 208.) Accordingly, Special Term properly denied the cross motion. Cohalan, J. P., Margett, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
#### § 51.767 Mature.

*Mature* shall have the same meaning assigned the term in the Florida Citrus Code, Chapter 601, 1995 Edition, and the Official Rules Affecting the Florida Citrus Industry, in effect as of February 12, 1995. These grapefruit maturity requirements are contained in the Florida Citrus Code, Chapter 601, Florida Statutes, Sections 601.16, 601.17, and 601.18, 1995 Edition, and the State of Florida Department of Citrus Official Rules Affecting the Florida Citrus Industry, Part 1, Chapter 20-13 Market Classification, Maturity Standards and Processing or Packing Restrictions for Hybrids in effect as of February 12, 1995. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from, Florida Department of Citrus, Post Office Box 148, Lakeland, Florida 33802 or copies of both regulations may be inspected at USDA, AMS, F&VD, FPB, Standardization Section, Room 2065-S, 14th and Independence Ave., Washington, DC 20250 or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.*
52.236 [Reserved]

52.236-1 Performance of Work by the Contractor.

52.236-2 Differing Site Conditions.

52.236-3 Site Investigation and Conditions Affecting the Work.

52.236-4 Physical Data.

52.236-5 Material and Workmanship.

52.236-6 Superintendence by the Contractor.

52.236-7 Permits and Responsibilities.

52.236-8 Other Contracts.

52.236-9 Protection of Existing Vegetation, Structures, Equipment, Utilities, and

Improvements.

52.236-10 Operations and Storage Areas.

52.236-11 Use and Possession Prior to Completion.

52.236-12 Cleaning Up.

52.236-13 Accident Prevention.

52.236-14 Availability and Use of Utility Services.

52.236-15 Schedules for Construction Contracts.

52.236-16 Quantity Surveys.

52.236-17 Layout of Work.

52.236-18 Work Oversight in Cost-Reimbursement Construction Contracts.

52.236-19 Organization and Direction of the Work.

52.236-20 [Reserved]

52.236-21 Specifications and Drawings for Construction.

52.236-22 Design Within Funding Limitations.

52.236-23 Responsibility of the Architect-Engineer Contractor.

52.236-24 Work Oversight in Architect-Engineer Contracts.

52.236-25 Requirements for Registration of Designers.

52.236-26 Preconstruction Conference.

52.236-27 Site Visit (Construction).

52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals-Construction.

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 5 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 70.72 Fees for appeal grading or review of a grader's decision.

The costs of an appeal grading or review of a grader's decision, shall be borne by the appellant on an unscheduled basis at rates set forth in § 70.71, plus any travel and additional expenses. If the appeal grading or review of a grader's decision discloses that a material error was made in the original determination, no fee or expenses will be charged.

[84 FR 49644, Sept. 23, 2019]
----

|  | (1)  | I      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Qualstar      Corporation; |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report; |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Based      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this      report; |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | The      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant      and have: |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | The      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,      to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent      functions): |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      February 14, 2008 |   | /s/   ANDREW      A. FARINA |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Andrew      A. Farina                      |   |
|                          |   | Principal      Financial Officer           |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INCOME
STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                           2,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,860
<INVENTORY>                                     28,776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,875
<PP&E>                                         133,623
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,799
<BONDS>                                         38,934
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,352
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,994
<SALES>                                         70,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,867
<CGS>                                           48,346
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,346
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,316
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (192)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,662
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,384
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,278
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Denise Smith, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Silver Pearl Enterprises, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



---

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date: October 19, 2007















/s/ Denise Smith







Denise Smith









Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Case No. 5:20cr34/TKW

MICHAEL HILL

______________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of the 

Defendant, MICHAEL HILL, to Count One of the Indictment is hereby 

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 22nd day of June, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE