alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
47.303-4 F.o.b. origin, freight prepaid.       (a)                   *Explanation of delivery term.*"F.o.b. origin, freight prepaid" means-                                                         (1) 								                Free of expense to the Government delivered-                                                                           (i) 										                    On board the indicated type of conveyance of the carrier (or of the Government, if specified) at a designated point in the city, county, and State from which the shipments will be made and from which line-haul transportation service (as distinguished from switching, local drayage, or other terminal service) will begin;                                                                              (ii) 										                    To, and placed on, the carrier’s wharf (at shipside, within reach of the ship’s loading tackle, when the shipping point is within a port area having water transportation service) or the carrier’s freight station;                                                                              (iii) 										                    To a U.S. Postal Service facility; or                                                                              (iv) 										                    If stated in the solicitation, to any Government-designated point located within the same city or commercial zone as the f.o.b. origin point specified in the contract (the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration prescribes commercial zones at Subpart B of 49 CFR part 372); and                                                                                                           (2) 								                The cost of transportation, ultimately the Government’s obligation, is prepaid by the contractor to the point specified in the contract.                                                                             (b)                   *Contractor responsibilities.* The contractor’s responsibilities are the same as those listed in 47.303-1(b), except that the contractor shall prepare commercial bills of lading or other transportation receipts and shall prepay all freight charges to the extent specified in the contract.                                          (c)                   *Contract clause.* The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at 52.247-32, F.o.b. Origin, Freight Prepaid, when the delivery term is f.o.b. origin, freight prepaid.    **Parent topic:** 47.303 Standard delivery terms and contract clauses.
#### FOX et al., Respondents, v. FITZPATRICK et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 23, 1906.)

Action by George A. Fox and others against Frank Fitzpatrick and others.

PER OURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with Costs.

WILLIAMS, J:, not voting.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No: 3:03cr150/RV

3:06cv446/RV/MD

SHELTON PERDUE

_____________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes onfor consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated April 27, 2007. The defendant previously has been furnished

a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (doc. 136) is

DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of May, 2007.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cr-00150-RV-MD Document 153 Filed 05/24/07 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cr-0169-WKW

)

WILLIAM TIMOTHY BARNETT )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the defendant Barnett’s Motion to Reset Sentencing (Doc.

# 484), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The sentencing hearing is

CONTINUED from January 25, 2008 to January 31, 2008, at 2:15 p.m.

DONE this 9th day of January, 2008.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 490 Filed 01/09/2008 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT32.2











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES
CODE








I, Per
Dyrvik, the Treasurer of UBS Managed Fund Services Inc., the Sponsor of UBS
Managed Futures LLC (Aspect Series) (the “Series”), certify that (i) the Annual
Report of the Series on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Series.











Date:
March 19,
2008


/s/ Per
      Dyrvik
              Per
      Dyrvik
              Treasurer
#### § 661.5 Exempt records.

Records exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552(b) may be withheld in accordance with 7 CFR 1.11.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2581 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain volleyballs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain volleyballs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN VOLLEYBALLS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.95.10 Volleyballs (provided for in 

subheading 9506.62.80) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 2581 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
̈§¦5

 ̈§¦5

Historic (1878) and Current Wetlands 

in the Nisqually Delta

Figure 3.2-4

3-17

Source: USFWS, 2000; Ducks Unlimited, 1999; Tanner 1999; EDAW, 2002

Nisqually NWR Draft CCP/EIS

Chapter 3 Affected Environment

N

0 0.5 1 0.25 Miles

1:60,000

P:\0e01401 Nisqually\GIS\mxd\Figure3.2-4.mxd

Current Wetland Resources

Wetland Type

Estuarine Subtidal (Open Water), E1

Estuarine Intertidal, E2

Upland, U

Palustrine (Freshwater), P

Riverine, R

Approved Nisqually NWR Boundary

Historic Wetland Resources, 1878

Wetland Type

Estuarine Subtidal (Open Water), E1

Estuarine Intertidal, E2

Upland, U

Palustrine (Freshwater), P

No Label

Approved Nisqually NWR Boundary

Historic Composition

33% 17%

48%

2%

E1 (2499 ac)

E2 (3708 ac)

U (1254 ac)

P (152 ac)

R (0 ac)

Current Composition

1%

37%

28%

14%

20% E1 (2851 ac)

E2 (2165 ac)

U (1512 ac)

P (1082 ac)

R (46 ac)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BARBARA STONE, and the

ESTATE OF HELEN STONE,

et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No.: 4:20cv568-MW/MAF

RONALD DESANTIS, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 18, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiffs’ 

“Emergency Motion to Move Forward with This Case Without Unconscionable 

Personal Affidavits,” ECF No. 21, which this Court construes as objections to the 

report and recommendation. Plaintiffs argue that this Court has not taken their claims 

seriously and should not require them to file affidavits in support of any motion to 

proceed in forma pauperis. Indeed, Plaintiffs assert they “do not believe an Affidavit 

is necessary,” and will not trust this Court with their personal information. ECF No. 

21 at 2-3.

Case 4:20-cv-00568-MW-MAF Document 22 Filed 03/24/21 Page 1 of 2
2

This Court has afforded Plaintiffs multiple opportunities to comply with court 

orders to submit a proper in forma pauperis motion and supporting affidavit to move 

forward with this case, see ECF Nos. 6, 8, & 15, however Plaintiffs have refused to 

do so. But Plaintiffs are not above the law. It is well-settled in this Circuit that 

proceeding in forma pauperis is not a right. See Carter v. Thomas, 527 F.2d 1332, 

1333 (5th Cir. 1976).1 It is a privilege, and permission to do so is committed to the 

discretion of this Court. Id. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiffs’

objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, 

“Plaintiffs’ claims are dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with 

court orders.” Plaintiffs’ “emergency motion,” ECF No. 21, is DENIED as moot, 

and the Clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED on March 24, 2021.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

1 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the 

Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed 

down prior to the close of business on September 30, 1981. 

Case 4:20-cv-00568-MW-MAF Document 22 Filed 03/24/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 51.28 When an application for an appeal inspection may be withdrawn.

An application for appeal inspection may be withdrawn by the applicant at any time before the appeal inspection is performed: *Provided,* That the applicant shall pay any travel expenses, telephone, telegraph or other expenses which have been incurred by the Inspection Service in connection with such application.
#### In re DOELGER'S WILL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

In the matter of proving the last will and testament of Johanna Doelger, also known as Johanna Doelger Schneider, deceased, etc.

No opinion. Decree of Surrogate's Court of Kings County affirmed, without costs.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September
30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matias Bullrich,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Matias Bullrich

Matias Bullrich

Chief Financial Officer

November 19, 2013



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the
Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
50.000 Scope of part.

This part-

(a)

(1) Prescribes policies and procedures for entering into, amending, or modifying contracts in order

to facilitate the national defense under the extraordinary emergency authority granted by Public

Law 85-804 (50 U. S.C. 1431-1434) and Executive Order 10789, dated November 14, 1958. It does

not cover advance payments (see subpart 32.4); and

(2) Implements indemnification authority granted by Pub. L. 85-804 and paragraph 1 A of E.O.

10789 with respect to any matter that has been, or could be, designated by the Secretary of

Homeland Security as a qualified anti-terrorism technology as defined in the Support Anti-terrorism

by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002 (SAFETY Act); and

(b) Implements SAFETY Act liability protections to promote development and use of anti-terrorism

technologies.

Parent topic: Part 50 - Extraordinary Contractual Actions and the safety act
#### § 4280.24 Revolved funds.

Rural Development and the Intermediary's supplemental funds will be considered revolved after they have been loaned to Ultimate Recipients and subsequently repaid. Loans made from revolved funds will not require prior approval of Rural Development for creditworthiness or environmental clearance purposes. All other Federal compliance requirements, including those in this subpart, remain in effect.
#### In the Matter of Janine W., Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: With commendable fairness the County Attorney has conceded that *People*v. *Duke, People*v. *Acker,*and *People*v. *Vargas,*reported together at 23 N Y 2d 780, are here controlling. In the light of these decisions, the record does not establish that the infant was a wayward minor. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Family Court, adjudicating respondent to be a wayward minor.) Present— Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Henry, JJ.
§ 718.4 Authority for farm entry and providing information. ( a ) This section applies to all farms that have a tobacco allotment or quota under part 723 of this chapter and all farms that are currently participating in programs administered by FSA.
( b ) A representative of FSA may enter any farm that participates in an FSA or CCC program in order to conduct a farm inspection as defined in this part. A program participant may request that the FSA representative present written authorization for the farm inspection before granting access to the farm. If a farm inspection is not allowed within 30 days of written authorization: ( 1 ) All FSA and CCC program benefits for that farm shall be denied;
( 2 ) The person preventing the farm inspection shall pay all costs associated with the farm inspection;
( 3 ) The entire crop production on the farm will be considered to be in excess of the quota established for the farm; and
( 4 ) For tobacco, the farm operator must furnish proof of disposition of: ( i ) All tobacco which is in addition to the production shown on the marketing card issued with respect to such farm; and
( ii ) No credit will be given for disposing of excess tobacco other than that identified by a marketing card unless disposed of in the presence of FSA in accordance with § 718.109 of this part.
( c ) If a program participant refuses to furnish reports or data necessary to determine benefits in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, or FSA determines that the report or data was erroneously provided through the lack of good faith, all program benefits relating to the report or data requested will be denied.
( d ) Program participants requesting program benefits as a beginning farmer or rancher, limited resource farmer or rancher, socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher, or veteran farmer or rancher must provide a certification of their status as a member of one of those groups as required by the applicable program provisions.
[68 FR 16172, Apr. 3, 2003, as amended at 84 FR 45886, Sept. 3, 2019]
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RICARDO BRYAN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:21cv17-MCR-MJF

OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF 

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, et al.,

Defendants.

/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation dated March 30, 2021. ECF No. 12. The Plaintiff was furnished a 

copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file 

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). After 

reviewing any timely objections to the Recommendation, the Court has determined 

that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 12, is 

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this Order.

Case 3:21-cv-00017-MCR-MJF Document 15 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§§1951€(2)(B)(i) and 1915A(b)(1) for maliciousness and abuse of the judicial 

process.

3. All pending motions are DISMISSED as MOOT.

4. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close 

this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of April 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:21-cv-00017-MCR-MJF Document 15 Filed 04/21/21 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002George W. Hamlin, IV, President and Chief Executive Officer and Lawrence A. Heilbronner, Chief Financial Officer, of Canandaigua National Corporation (the "Company"), each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, and that to the best of his knowledge:  (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Company.The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.August 7, 2009/s/ George W. Hamlin, IV/s/ Lawrence A. HeilbronnerGeorge W. Hamlin, IVLawrence A. HeilbronnerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
52.227-16 Additional Data Requirements.       As prescribed in 27.409(d), insert the following clause:          Additional Data Requirements (June 1987)                                       (a) 						            In addition to the data (as defined in the clause at 52.227-14, Rights in Data-General clause or other equivalent included in this contract) specified elsewhere in this contract to be delivered, the Contracting Officer may, at any time during contract performance or within a period of 3 years after acceptance of all items to be delivered under this contract, order any data first produced or specifically used in the performance of this contract.                                          (b) 						            The Rights in Data-General clause or other equivalent included in this contract is applicable to all data ordered under this Additional Data Requirements clause. Nothing contained in this clause shall require the Contractor to deliver any data the withholding of which is authorized by the Rights in Data-General or other equivalent clause of this contract, or data which are specifically identified in this contract as not subject to this clause.                                          (c) 						            When data are to be delivered under this clause, the Contractor will be compensated for converting the data into the prescribed form, for reproduction, and for delivery.                                          (d) 						            The Contracting Officer may release the Contractor from the requirements of this clause for specifically identified data items at any time during the 3-year period set forth in paragraph (a) of this clause.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.227 [Reserved]
# L_2014059EN.01003401.xml

| 28.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 59/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 59/34

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 27 February 2014

appointing a member of the Court of Auditors

(2014/108/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 286(2) thereof,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The term of office of Mr Harald WÖGERBAUER is due to expire on 28 February 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The term of office of Mr Harald WÖGERBAUER is due to expire on 28 February 2014.

| (2) | A new appointment should therefore be made, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A new appointment should therefore be made,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Oskar HERICS is hereby appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 1 March 2014 to 29 February 2020.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 27 February 2014.

For the Council

The President

D. KOURKOULAS

---

(1)  Opinion of 25 February 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

---
§ 58.158 Official identification. ( a ) Application for authority to apply official identification to packaging material or containers shall be made in accordance with the provisions of subpart A of this part. (title 7, §§ 58.49 through 58.57 of the Code of Federal Regulations.)
( b ) Only dairy products received, processed, or manufactured in accordance with the specifications contained in this subpart and inspected and/or graded in accordance with the provisions of this part may be identified with official identification.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BioFuel Energy, Corp. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott H. Pearce, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify to my knowledge,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

| | /s/SCOTT H. PEARCEScott H. Pearce President and Chief
Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BioFuel Energy Corp. and will be retained by BioFuel Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks