alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2722 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

170 East Main Street in Patchogue, New York, as the ‘‘Lieutenant 

Michael P. Murphy Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 170 East Main Street in Patchogue, New 

York, as the ‘‘Lieutenant Michael P. Murphy Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT MICHAEL P. MURPHY POST OF4 FICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 170 East Main Street in 

7 Patchogue, New York, shall be known and designated as 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2722 IS

1 the ‘‘Lieutenant Michael P. Murphy Post Office Build2 ing’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lieutenant Michael 

7 P. Murphy Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
§ 51.2548 Average moisture content determination. ( a ) Determining average moisture content of the lot is not a requirement of the grades, except when nuts are specified as “very well dried.” It may be carried out upon request in connection with grade analysis or as a separate determination.
( b ) Nuts shall be obtained from a randomly drawn composite sample. Official certification shall be based on the air-oven method or other officially approved methods or devices. Results obtained by methods or devices not officially approved may be reported and shall include a description of the method or device and the owner of any equipment used.
[68 FR 50685, Aug. 22, 2003]
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eye Care centers of America, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jennifer L. Kelley, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                |  |                                                     
|--------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|August 11, 2008 |  |                                                     
|                | 
|                |  | /s/ Jennifer L. Kelley                              
|                |  | Jennifer L. Kelley                                  
|                |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EYE CARE CENTERS OF
AMERICA, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

DAVID W. JAHN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-623-MEF

)

REGINALD JAMES WASHINGTON, )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc.

#34) filed on July 3, 2007, which seeks summary judgment on and the dismissal of Plaintiff's

claims of wantonness and negligent entrustment, and Plaintiff's Response to Defendants'

Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. # 37), in which Plaintiff stipulates to the

dismissal of the claims of wantonness and negligent entrustment, it is hereby 

ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. #34) is

GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims of wantonness and negligent entrustment are DISMISSED

with PREJUDICE.

DONE this the 31st day of August, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 40 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 1
156 So.2d 602

#### Robert J. MAGONI v. Germaine Cazenave WELLS, d/b/a Arnaud’s Restaurant.

No. 46889.

Oct. 9, 1963.

In re: Robert J. Magoni applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 154 So.2d 524.

*60Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.

FOURNET, C. J., and HAMLIN and SANDERS, JJ., are of the opinion that the writ should be granted.
49.101 Authorities and responsibilities.       (a) 						            The termination clauses or other contract clauses authorize contracting officers to terminate contracts for convenience, or for default, and to enter into settlement agreements under this regulation.                                          (b) 						            The contracting officer shall terminate contracts, whether for default or convenience, only when it is in the Government’s interest. The contracting officer shall effect a no-cost settlement instead of issuing a termination notice when-                                                         (1) 								                It is known that the contractor will accept one,                                                            (2) 								                Government property was not furnished, and                                                            (3) 								                There are no outstanding payments, debts due the Government, or other contractor obligations.                                                                             (c) 						            When the price of the undelivered balance of the contract is less than $5,000, the contract should not normally be terminated for convenience but should be permitted to run to completion.                                          (d) 						            After the contracting officer issues a notice of termination, the termination contracting officer (TCO) is responsible for negotiating any settlement with the contractor, including a no-cost settlement if appropriate. Auditors and TCO’s shall promptly schedule and complete audit reviews and negotiations, giving particular attention to the need for timely action on all settlements involving small business concerns.                                          (e) 						            If the same item is under contract with both large and small business concerns and it is necessary to terminate for convenience part of the units still to be delivered, preference shall be given to the continuing performance of small business contracts over large business contracts unless the chief of the contracting office determines that this is not in the Government’s interest.                                          (f) 						            The contracting officer is responsible for the release of excess funds resulting from the termination unless this responsibility is specifically delegated to the TCO.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 49.1 - General Principles
----

**ANNUAL      STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

**Pooling      and Servicing Agreement dated September 11, 2006 (the "Pooling and Servicing      Agreement") by and among Structured Asset Securities Corporation II, as      depositor, Wachovia Bank N.A., as master servicer, LaSalle Bank N.A. as trustee      and LNR Partners, Inc. as special servicer (the "Special      Servicer")**

**LB-UBS      2006-C6**

| 1.   | I                have reviewed the activities performed by the Special Servicer under                the                Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the period ending the end                of the                fiscal year 2006 (the “Reporting                Period”)                and the Special Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing                Agreement has been made under my supervision;                and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | To                the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer                has                fulfilled its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement                in all                material respects throughout the Reporting Period. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
exv10w35






Exhibit 10.35




AMENDMENT dated 30 April 2007




of the




SERVICES AND MATERIALS AGREEMENT dated 20 April 2007




By and between




SCOTTISH BIOMEDICAL LIMITED T/A “SCOTTISH BIOMEDICAL”




and OMEROS CORPORATION




     This is an amendment (this “Amendment”) effective 30 April 2007, between Scottish Biomedical
Limited T/A “Scottish Biomedical” (“Scottish Biomedical”) and Omeros Corporation (“Omeros”) of the
Services and Materials Agreement dated 20 April 2007 (“the Agreement”) related to Omeros’ PDE10
program.



     The Agreement is hereby amended to replace original Appendix 1 (pages 20-22 of the Agreement)
with the corrected Appendix 1 attached hereto (amended pages 20-22).



     All other terms of the Agreement remain unchanged and in force. This Amendment is accepted
and acknowledged by each party, as of the effective date set forth herein above, through the
signature of its authorized representatives below:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	SCOTTISH BIOMEDICAL LIMITED	 	 	 	OMEROS CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Eric Smith
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Gregory A. Demopulos
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Eric Smith
	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Gregory A. Demopulos, M.D.
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	Finance Director
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Chairman & CEO
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 




† DESIGNATES PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT THAT HAVE BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION




Amended 20




 









 





Appendix 1




Proposed alterations to current catechols.




     [†] 
[Redaction continues for three pages]




† DESIGNATES PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT THAT HAVE BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION




Amended
21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,869,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,600
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      10,266,600
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,618,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,168,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          695,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,168,900
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               969,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  733,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (49,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                281,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            281,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   281,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     9.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Carlos Fabian De Sousa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
                Carlos Fabian De SousaCarlos
                Fabian De SousaChief
                Financial OfficerNovember
                6, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being
      filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
      document.
#### § 58.2826 General identification.

Consumer packaged product shall comply with the applicable labeling regulations of the Food and Drug Administration.
#### § 52.41 Payment of fees and charges.

Fees and charges for any inspection service shall be paid by the interested party making the application for such service, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the regulations in this part, and if so required by the inspection service, an advance of funds prior to rendering inspection service in an amount suitable to the Administrator, or a surety bond suitable to the Administrator, shall be required as a guarantee of payment for the services rendered. All fees and charges for any inspection service performed pursuant to the regulations in this part shall be paid by check, draft, or money order payable to the United States Department of Agriculture. Remittance shall be sent to the address specified on the bill for collection on or before the due date to avoid a late payment charge.

[51 FR 20445, June 5, 1986]
101 World Drive Peachtree, GA 30269 Our Ref: OZ/0 1 4/ 1 3/FAA Via Docket Management System Web Site 29 April 2013 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 400 7 th Street, Southwest Room PL-401 Washington, DC 20590 - 0001 Re: Request for Extension Exemption No. 9342 Docket N o. FAA- 2007 - 28168 Dear Sir/Madam: In accordance with the provisions of 14 CFR 11, Subpart A, 121.434(c)(1)(ii), North American Airlines (NOCA172S) requests an extension to our previously approved Exemption No. 9342 . This exemption has permitted North Am erican Airlines to substitute a qualified and authorized C heck Airman in place of an FAA Inspector to observe a qualifying Pilot in Command (PIC) while that PIC is performing prescribed duties during at least one flight that includes a takeoff and a landin g when completing initial or upgrade training as specified in FAR 121.424. This substitution has occurred only at the discretion of the POI and only when an FAA Inspector was not immediately available. North American Airlines has complied with the Cond itions and Limitations set forth by the initial June 20, 2007 and subsequent approval letter . Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me . Very truly yours,

Roberta Mercurio Manager Operations Administration cc: David Currier – NAA Senior Director- Flight Operations Shane E. Pengelly – FAA Principal Operations Inspector
§ 3201.67 Dishwashing products. ( a ) *Definition.* Soaps and detergents used for cleaning and clean rinsing of tableware in either hand washing or dishwashing.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 58 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 23, 2012, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased dishwashing products. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased dishwashing products.
[76 FR 43817, July 22, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                         9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BERKSHIRE BANCORP INC. QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                    502
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                 12,510
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                       10,750
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            96,886
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    860
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      859
<LOANS>                                74,564
<ALLOWANCE>                             1,053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        212,033
<DEPOSITS>                             97,996
<SHORT-TERM>                                0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                    24,206
<LONG-TERM>                             6,500
<COMMON>                                  256
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                             83,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>        212,033
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         4,695
<INTEREST-INVEST>                       4,637
<INTEREST-OTHER>                          903
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                       10,235
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      3,027
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      3,607
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   6,628
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              15
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                     13,288
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         3,696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        17,394
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>             17,394
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           11,165
<EPS-BASIC>                            5.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                            5.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                           4.78
<LOANS-NON>                                 0
<LOANS-PAST>                                0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                            0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                          923
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               0
<RECOVERIES>                              115
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                       1,053
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                    1,053
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                 1,053




</TABLE>
§ 760.1507 Payment limitation. ( a ) For any 2017 WHIP payments for the 2017 or 2018 crop year combined, a person or legal entity, other than a joint venture or general partnership, is eligible to receive, directly or indirectly, 2017 WHIP payments of not more than: ( 1 ) $125,000, if less than 75 percent of the person or legal entity's average adjusted gross income is average adjusted gross farm income; or
( 2 ) $900,000, if not less than 75 percent of the average adjusted gross income of the person or legal entity is average adjusted gross farm income.
( b ) For any WHIP+ payments, a person or legal entity, other than a joint venture or general partnership, is eligible to receive, directly or indirectly, WHIP+ payments of not more than: ( 1 ) $125,000 combined for the 2018, 2019, and 2020 crop years, if less than 75 percent of the person or legal entity's average adjusted gross income is average adjusted gross farm income; or
( 2 ) $250,000 for each of the 2018, 2019, and 2020 crop years, if 75 percent or more of the average adjusted gross income of the person or legal entity is average adjusted gross farm income, and such payments cannot exceed a total of $500,000 combined for all of the 2018, 2019, and 2020 crop years.
( c ) A person or legal entity's average adjusted gross income and average adjusted gross farm income are determined based on the: ( 1 ) 2013, 2014, and 2015 tax years for 2017 WHIP;
( 2 ) 2015, 2016, and 2017 tax years for WHIP+.
( d ) To be eligible for more than $125,000 in payments for the applicable period specified in this section, a person or legal entity must submit FSA-892 and provide a certification in the manner prescribed by FSA from a certified public accountant or attorney that at least 75 percent of the person or legal entity's average adjusted gross income was average adjusted gross farm income. Persons or legal entities who fail to provide FSA-892 and the required certification may not receive a 2017 WHIP payment, directly or indirectly, of more than $125,000.
( e ) The direct attribution provisions in part 1400 of this chapter apply to payments under this subpart for both payment limitation as well as in determining average AGI as defined and used in this rule.
[83 FR 33801, July 18, 2018, as amended 84 FR 48529, Sept. 13, 2019]