alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Thomas C. Hansen, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Heelys, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: March 12, 2010

By:

/s/ THOMAS C. HANSEN Thomas C. Hansen Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
210.001 Policy.

(a) In addition to the requirements of FAR 10.001(a)—

(i)(A) Agencies shall conduct market research appropriate to the circumstances before issuing a

solicitation with tiered evaluation of offers (section 816 of Pub. L. 109-163); and

(B) Use the results of market research to determine whether the criteria in FAR part 19 are met for

setting aside the acquisition for small business or, for a task or delivery order, whether there are a

sufficient number of qualified small business concerns available to justify limiting competition under

the terms of the contract. If the contracting officer cannot determine whether the criteria are met,

the contracting officer shall include a written explanation in the contract file as to why such a

determination could not be made (section 816 of Pub. L. 109-163).

(ii) Contracting officers shall use market research, where appropriate, to inform price

reasonableness determinations (see 212.209 and 234.7002).

(c)(2) In addition to the notification requirements at FAR 10.001(c)(2)(i) and (ii), see 205.205-70 for

the bundling notification publication requirement.

Parent topic: Part 210 - MARKET RESEARCH
#### § 51.1563 Soft rot or wet breakdown.

*Soft rot or wet breakdown* means any soft, mushy, or leaky condition of the tissue such as slimy soft rot, leak, or wet breakdown following freezing injury.
EX-34 (d)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
1601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Members
Regulus Group LLC:

We have examined management's assessment for those customers that management has
informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the
accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers
of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios
that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Regulus Group LLC has determined
that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, PA
February 22, 2007

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member firm of KPMG
International, a Swiss cooperative.
EX-35 (c)
(logo) OCWEN


ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

March 8, 2007

RE: Renaissance 2006-3

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"), Ocwen Loan
Servicing, LLC ("OLS") furnishes this annual servicer compliance statement
pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, indicating its compliance with the
servicing standards of the Securities & Exchange Commission as set forth in
Regulation AB, 17 CFR Section 229.1100, et seq., ("Regulation AB"). In this
regard, I make the following representations, which are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief in all material respects.

1.   A review of the servicing activities of OLS during the Reporting Period,
     and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement dated as of September
     28, 2006 (the "Agreement"), has been performed under my supervision.

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on this review, OLS has fulfilled all of
     its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
     Reporting Period.

By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris
Name:  Ronald M. Faris
Title: President


Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
1661 Worthington Road Suite 100
Centrepark West
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

HERIBIERTO RODRIGUEZ, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1376

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed December 19, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Polk County; Donald G. Jacobsen, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
52.239 [Reserved]

52.239-1 Privacy or Security Safeguards.

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
§ 760.1517 Requirement to purchase crop insurance or NAP coverage. ( a ) For the first 2 consecutive crop years for which crop insurance or NAP coverage is available after the enrollment period for 2017 WHIP or WHIP+ ends, subject to paragraph (c) of this section, a participant who receives payment under this subpart for a crop loss in a county must obtain: ( 1 ) For an insurable crop, crop insurance with at least a 60 percent coverage level for that crop in that county; or
( 2 ) For a NAP eligible crop: ( i ) NAP coverage with a coverage level of 60 percent, if available for the applicable crop year, or NAP catastrophic coverage if NAP coverage is not offered at a 60 percent coverage level for that crop year.
( ii ) Participants who exceed the average adjusted gross income limitation for NAP payment eligibility[1] for the applicable crop year may meet the purchase requirement specified in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section by purchasing Whole-Farm Revenue Protection crop insurance coverage, if eligible, or paying the NAP service fee and premium even though the participant will not be eligible to receive a NAP payment due to the average adjusted gross income limit but will be eligible for the WHIP payment.
( b ) For the first 2 consecutive insurance years for which crop insurance is available after the enrollment period for 2017 WHIP ends, subject to paragraph (c) of this section, any participant who receives 2017 WHIP payments for a tree, bush, or vine loss must purchase a plan of insurance for the tree, bush, or vine with at least a 60 percent coverage level.
( c ) The final crop year to purchase crop insurance or NAP coverage to meet the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section is the: ( 1 ) 2021 crop year for 2017 WHIP payment eligibility, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section;
( 2 ) 2023 crop year for: ( i ) WHIP+ payment eligibility; and
( ii ) 2017 WHIP payment eligibility for losses due to Tropical Storm Cindy, losses of peach and blueberry crops in calendar year 2017 due to extreme cold, and blueberry productivity losses in calendar year 2018 due to extreme cold and hurricane damage in calendar year 2017.
( d ) If a producer fails to obtain crop insurance or NAP coverage as required in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the producer must reimburse FSA for the full amount of 2017 WHIP payment or WHIP+ payment plus interest that the producer received for that crop, tree, bush, or vine loss. A producer will only be considered to have obtained NAP coverage for the purposes of this section if the participant applied and payed the requisite NAP service fee and paid any applicable premium by the applicable deadline and completed all program requirements, including filing an acreage report as may be required under such coverage agreement.
[83 FR 33801, July 18, 2018, as amended 84 FR 48532, Sept. 13, 2019] Footnotes -
760.1517
[1] See §§ 1400.500(a) and 1400.1(a)(4) of this title.
§ 4279.232 Guaranteed loan funding. ( a ) The amount of a loan guaranteed for a Project under this subpart will not exceed 80 percent of total Eligible Project Costs. Total Federal participation will not exceed 80 percent of total Eligible Project Costs. The Borrower needs to provide the remaining 20 percent from non-Federal sources to complete the Project. Eligible Project Costs are specified in § 4279.210(d). If an eligible Borrower receives other direct Federal funding (*i.e.,* direct loans or grants) for a Project, the maximum amount of the loan that the Agency will guarantee under this subpart must be reduced by the same amount of the other direct Federal funding that the eligible Borrower received for the Project. For example, an eligible Borrower is applying for a loan guarantee on a $100,000,000 Project. If the Borrower receives no other direct Federal funding for this Project and requests an $80,000,000 guaranteed loan, the Agency will consider a guarantee on the $80,000,000. However, if this Borrower receives $10,000,000 in other direct Federal funding for this Project, the Agency will only consider a guarantee on $70,000,000.
( b ) The maximum principal amount of a loan guaranteed under this subpart is $250 million to one Borrower; there is no minimum amount.
( c ) The maximum guarantee on the principal and Interest due on a loan guaranteed under this subpart will be determined as specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this section. ( 1 ) If the loan amount is equal to or less than $125 million, 80 percent for the entire loan amount unless all of the conditions specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section are met, in which case 90 percent for the entire loan amount. ( i ) Total Federal participation, sum of the amount of the loan requested and other direct Federal funding, must not be greater than 60 percent of total Eligible Project Costs;
( ii ) Feedstock and Off-Take Agreements of at least 1 year in duration; and
( iii ) Total of revenues from tax credits, carbon credits, or other Federal or State subsidies cannot be greater than 10 percent of the Project's total revenues on an annual basis, in the Borrower's base case of financial projections.
( 2 ) If the loan amount is more than $125 million and less than $150 million, 80 percent for the entire loan amount.
( 3 ) If the loan amount is equal to or more than $150 million but less than $200 million, 70 percent on the entire loan amount.
( 4 ) If the loan amount is $200 million up to and including $250 million, 60 percent on the entire loan amount.
213.7002 Purchase orders.

The contracting officer need not obtain a contractor’s written acceptance of a purchase order or

modification of a purchase order for an acquisition under the 8(a) Program pursuant to 219.804-2(2).

Parent topic: Subpart 213.70 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES UNDER THE 8(A)

PROGRAM
52.207-4 Economic Purchase Quantity-Supplies.       As prescribed in 7.203, insert the following provision:          Economic Purchase Quantity-Supplies (Aug 1987)                                       (a)                    						            Offerors are invited to state an opinion on whether the quantity(ies) of supplies on which bids, proposals or quotes are requested in this solicitation is (are) economically advantageous to the Government.                __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________                                                          (b)                    						            Each offeror who believes that acquisitions in different quantities would be more advantageous is invited to recommend an economic purchase quantity. If different quantities are recommended, a total and a unit price must be quoted for applicable items. An economic purchase quantity is that quantity at which a significant price break occurs. If there are significant price breaks at different quantity points, this information is desired as well.                Offeror RecommendationsItem                            Quantity                            Price Quotation                            Total____________                            ____________                            ____________                            ____________(c)                    						            The information requested in this provision is being solicited to avoid acquisitions in disadvantageous quantities and to assist the Government in developing a data base for future acquisitions of these items. However, the Government reserves the right to amend or cancel the solicitation and resolicit with respect to any individual item in the event quotations received and the Government’s requirements indicate that different quantities should be acquired.                                 (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.207 [Reserved]
# 9.109 Prohibition on contracting with an entity involved in activities that violate arms control treaties or agreements with the United States.

- 9.109-1 Authority. 
- 9.109-2 Prohibition. 
- 9.109-3 Exception. 
- 9.109-4 Certification by the offeror. 
- 9.109-5 Solicitation provision. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 9.1 - Responsible Prospective Contractors
**Exhibit 33.2**

REPORT ON ASSESSSMENT OF

COMPLIANCEWITH SEC REGULATION AB CRITERIA

First DataResources, Inc. through its affiliate REMITCO, LLC (jointly, the “AssertingParty”) is responsible for assessing compliance for the servicing oftransactions on the remittance payment platform relating to the opening,listing and depositing of remittance payments mailed to post office boxesserviced by the Asserting Party as of and for the 12 month period endingDecember 31, 2006, (the “ReportingPeriod) with the servicing criteria set forth in the Securities and ExchangeCommission’s Regulation AB Section229.1122(d), except for the criteria set forth in Sections229.1122(d)(l)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv),1122(d)(4)(i)-(iii) and (v)-(xv), which the Asserting Party has concluded arenot applicable to the servicing of the transactions as set forth in agreementsbetween Capital One Services, Inc., together with its affiliates, Capital OneBank and Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. and the Asserting Party in so far as itrelates to the opening, listing and depositing of remittance payments mailed topost office boxes serviced by the Asserting Party (the “Applicable ServicingCriteria”) for the Reporting Period.

The AssertingParty has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria by theAsserting Party for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the AssertingParty has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable ServicingCriteria for the servicing of transactions relating to the opening, listing anddepositing of remittance payments mailed to post office boxes serviced by theAsserting Party as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period.

Ernst & Young LLP, an independentregistered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on theassessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Periodas set forth in this assertion.
| First Data Resources, Inc. |   | REMITCO LLC      |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------|
|                       |   |             |
|                       |   |             |
| By:                        |   | /s/ David Bailis |   | By: |   | /s/ Scott Dickey |
|                       |   | David Bailis     |   |   |   | Scott Dickey |
|                       |   | President        |   |   |   | President |

 

February26, 2007

** **

----
| 1.   | The      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual period ended      September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m);      and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:            |   | December      29, 2008             |
|------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|  Signature: |   |  /s/      Kenneth Craig       |
|  Title:     |   |  Chief      Executive Officer |
Opinion issued August 27, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00417-CV

———————————

IN RE LG CHEM LTD., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, LG Chem Ltd., has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

challenging the trial court’s ruling on real party in interest Dunta White’s motion to 

compel discovery responses.

1

 

1 The underlying case is Dunta White v. H Town Vape Inc., LG Chem Ltd., MRL Distributor 

LLC d/b/a MES Distributor, Perfection Pen LLC, Sysmax Industry Trading Co., Ltd., 

Teodick Eisaghalian d/b/a Made Man Mods, Morgan Roberts, LA Vapor, Inc., and 

Shenzhen Fest Technology Co. Ltd., Cause No. 2018-02182, in the 157th District Court of 

Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Tanya Garrison presiding.
2

We deny the petition.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Goodman, and Landau.
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-62 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
52.241-1 Electric Service Territory Compliance Representation.       As prescribed in 41.501(b), insert a provision substantially the same as the following:          Electric Service Territory Compliance Representation (May 1999)                                       (a) 						            Section 8093 of Public Law100-202 generally requires purchases of electricity by any department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States to be consistent with State law governing the provision of electric utility service, including State utility commission rulings and electric utility franchises or service territories established pursuant to State statute, State regulation, or State-approved territorial agreements.                                          (b) 						            By signing this offer, the offeror represents that this offer to sell electricity is consistent with Section 8093 of Public Law100-202.                                          (c) 						            Upon request of the Contracting Officer, the offeror shall submit supporting legal and factual rationale for this representation.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.241 Utility Services Provisions and Clauses.