alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
23.1005 Contract clause.       (a) 						            Insert the clause at 52.223-5, Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information, in solicitations and contracts that provide for performance, in whole or in part, on a Federal facility.                                          (b) 						            Use the clause with its Alternate I if the contract provides for contractor-                                                         (1) 								                Operation or maintenance of a Federal facility at which the agency has implemented or plans to implement an EMS; or                                                            (2) 								                Activities and operations-                                                                           (i) 										                    To be performed at a Government-operated Federal facility that has implemented or plans to implement an EMS; and                                                                              (ii) 										                    That the agency has determined are covered within the EMS.                                                                                                                            (c) 						            Use the clause with its Alternate II if-                                                         (1) 								                The contract provides for contractor activities on a Federal facility; and                                                            (2) 								                The agency has determined that the contractor activities should be included within the FCA or an environmental management system audit.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 23.10 - Federal Compliance with Right-to-Know Laws and Pollution Prevention Requirements
Subpart 22.9 - Nondiscrimination Because of

Age

Parent topic: Part 22 - Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions

22.901 Policy.

Executive Order11141, February 12,1964 (29 FR2477), states that the Government policy is as

follows:

(a) Contractors and subcontractors shall not, in connection with employment, advancement, or

discharge of employees, or the terms, conditions, or privileges of their employment, discriminate

against persons because of their age except upon the basis of a bona fide occupational qualification,

retirement plan, or statutory requirement.

(b) Contractors and subcontractors, or persons acting on their behalf, shall not specify in

solicitations or advertisements for employees to work on Government contracts, a maximum age

limit for employment unless the specified maximum age limit is based upon a bona fide occupational

qualification, retirement plan, or statutory requirement.

(c) Agencies will bring this policy to the attention of contractors. The use of contract clauses is not

required.

22.902 Handling complaints.

Agencies shall bring complaints regarding a contractor’s compliance with this policy to that

contractor’s attention (in writing, if appropriate), stating the policy, indicating that the contractor’s

compliance has been questioned, and requesting that the contractor take any appropriate steps that

may be necessary to comply.
Federal Acquisition Regulation

Part 52 - Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses

Part 53 - Forms

Parent topic: Subchapter H - Clauses and Forms
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
McCombs Realty Partners 1998 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000759198
<NAME> MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998   
<CASH>                                             358
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       98
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           5,931
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,418)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,418   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          5,684     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,421)    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,418    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,053   
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,112    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 361    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (59)     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.43)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 66 (Monday, April 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 19050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07599]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Tennessee Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a meeting of the Tennessee 
Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will convene at 1:30 
p.m. and adjourn at approximately 3:00 p.m. on Monday, April 21, 2014. 
The meeting will be held at the Main Nashville Public Library, 615 
Church Street, Nashville, TN. The purpose of the meeting is for the 
Committee to discuss its voting rights report and plan future 
activities.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. 
Comments must be received in the regional office by May 21, 2014. 
Comments may be mailed to Peter Minarik at the Southern Regional 
Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 61 Forsyth St. SW., Suite 
16T126, Atlanta, GA 30303. They may also be faxed to the Committee at 
(404) 562-7005 or emailed to pminarik@usccr.gov. Persons who desire 
additional information may contact the Southern Regional Office at 
(404) 562-7000.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Southern 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Southern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Southern Regional Office at the above 
email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Chicago, IL, on April 1, 2014.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2014-07599 Filed 4-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
#### § 400.301 Basis, purpose, and applicability.

The regulations contained in this subpart are issued pursuant to the Federal Crop Insurance Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1501 *et seq.*), to prescribe the procedures for nonstandard determinations and the assignment of assigned yields or premium rates in conformance with the intent of section 508 of the Act (7 U.S.C. 1508). These regulations are applicable to all policies of insurance insured or reinsured by the Corporation under the Act and on those policies where the insurance coverage or indemnities are based on determinations applicable to the individual insured. These regulations will not be applicable to any policy where the amount of coverage or indemnities are based on the experience of the area.

[62 FR 22876, Apr. 28, 1997]
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 54 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 54 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 54 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 07- 41238 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f- A pp el l ee v. FE LI X VARGAS - HERRERA D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 5 : 0 1 - CR- 1 4 8 - ALL B e fo r e H IG G IN B O T H A M , D E N N IS , a n d P R A D O , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ederalP u bl i c D efen der app oi n t ed to represent Fel i x V argas- H errer a (V argas) ha s m oved f or l eave to w i t h draw an d h as filed a bri ef i n accor da n ce w i t h A n d er s v . C a lif

o rn ia , 3 86 U . S . 7 38 ( 196 7) . V argas h as n otfi l ed a respon se. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l os e s no n on frivo l ou s is s u e for ap p ea l . A ccord i n gly, cou n sel’ s m oti on f or leav e to w i t hdr aw i s G RA N TE D , c o uns e li s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he rr e s po ns ibi l i t i e s he r e i n, a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
Exhibit 33.2
                                 ------------




          ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA



The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o  As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



                                      1
<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007



                                      2
#### § 3565.450 OMB control number.

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no party is required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0575-0174.
tsro_Ex10_4



		

			

		





		
			Exhibit 10.4
		

		
			 
		

		
			AMENDMENT #2 
		

		
			TO THE TESARO, INC.
		

		
			2012 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
		

		
			 
		

		
			The TESARO, Inc. 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as set forth below, effective as of the date of adoption (the “Adoption Date”) of this Amendment by the Board of Directors of TESARO, Inc. (the “Company”):
		

		
			 
		

		
			1.The seventh sentence of Section 18.3 of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
		

		
			 
		

		
			The maximum number of shares of Stock that may be withheld from any Award to satisfy any federal, state, or local tax withholding requirements upon the exercise, vesting, or lapse of restrictions applicable to any Award or payment of shares of Stock pursuant to such Award, as applicable, may not exceed such number of shares of Stock having a Fair Market Value equal to the minimum statutory amount required by the Company or the applicable Affiliate to be withheld and paid to any such federal, state, or local taxing authority with respect to such exercise, vesting, lapse of restrictions, or payment of shares of Stock; provided,  however, for so long as Accounting Standards Update 2016-09 or a similar rule remains in effect, and subject to Applicable Laws, the Board or the Committee has full discretion to choose, or to allow a Grantee to elect, to withhold a number of shares of Stock having an aggregate Fair Market Value that is greater than the applicable minimum required statutory withholding obligation (but such withholding may in no event be in excess of the maximum required statutory withholding amount(s) in such Grantee’s relevant tax jurisdiction).
		

		
			 
		

		
			2.The Plan shall otherwise be unchanged by this Amendment.
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			***
		

		
			 
		

		
			The foregoing Amendment #2 to the Plan was duly adopted and approved by the Board of Directors of the Company by resolution by Unanimous Written Consent on February 24, 2018
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			/s/ Joseph L. Farmer
		

		
			Secretary
#### Samuel Lesser, Respondent-Appellant, v. State of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

(Claim No. 41656.)

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts, without cqsts, and claim dismissed, without costs. Findings of fact disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: Claimant asserts as a basis for recovery of damages and forfeiture against the State that the Commissioner of Corrections, Chairman of the New York State Board of Parole and the Warden of Attica State Prison and their agents, wantonly, willfully and arbitrarily committed, detained and imprisoned the claimant for a period of 3 years, 8 months and 7 days without legal authority and in direct contravention of section 1269 of the Civil Practice Act. It is clear that the prison authorities at Attica State Prison were in error in charging to the claimant 3 years, 8 months and 7 days, later changed to one year, 8 months and 16 days, as time owed on a previous sentence because that sentence had been set aside and on resentencing he had been sentenced to time already served. The proof established that on June 11, 1932, the claimant was committed to Sing Sing following a conviction for kidnapping under a valid commitment of the court and was detained there under a lawful sentence of 50 years. While he was advised by the prison authorities six years later that he had been charged with time owed on a previous sentence his release on parole was at the earliest date possible and was not delayed in any way by the computation by the authorities of time owed. He is presently on parole in accordance with the 50-year sentence of June 11, 1932, and that parole will not expire until January 21, 1982. The period of parole at least until January 21, 1982 is not affected in any way by any charge of time owed. The two essential elements of the claim asserted here which are required of proof are that there was an erroneous computation of prison time charged to the claimant and that there was in consequence of such computation a detention and imprisonment by the State without lawful authority. While the first element is conceded by the State the proof provides no basis for a finding that there was any unlawful detention or imprisonment or any restriction of unlawful parole imposed as a consequence of an erroneous computation of time by the prison authorities. At most at this time the claimant faces the possibility that on the date of the lawful expiration of his parole January 21, 1982, the State of New York will seek to impose on him the restrictions of an unlawful extension of parole. We cannot now speculate as to what the State may do or presume that the State will at some future time act unlawfully. If it does the claimant may seek an appropriate remedy at that time. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims, for claimant on a claim for false imprisonment; also appeal by claimant from same judgment on the ground of inadequacy.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Del Veeehio and Marsh, JJ.
§ 763.13 Fees. ( a ) *Payment of fees.* The seller and buyer will be responsible for payment of any expenses or fees necessary to process the Land Contract Agreement required by the State or County to ensure that proper title is vested in the seller including, but not limited to, attorney fees, recording costs, and notary fees.
( b ) [Reserved]
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOSE CRUZ,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-584-AW-MAF

FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Jose Cruz, a Florida inmate, filed this § 1983 action against Florida’s Attorney

General. I have considered the magistrate judge’s March 1, 2021 Amended Report 

and Recommendation, ECF No. 14, and I have considered de novo Cruz’s 

objections, ECF No. 15. I agree with the magistrate judge that this case must be 

dismissed for failure to state a claim. Cruz is attacking a state-court conviction 

through a § 1983 action, which Heck prohibits. 

I note that after the magistrate judge issued the Amended Report and 

Recommendation, Cruz submitted another “second amended complaint.” ECF No. 

16. The magistrate judge explained that this is identical to an earlier filing. ECF No. 

17. At any rate, it was filed without leave and—like the other pleadings—fails to 

state a claim. 

Case 4:20-cv-00584-AW-MAF Document 18 Filed 04/19/21 Page 1 of 2
2

It is now ORDERED:

1. The Amended Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14) is adopted 

and incorporated into this order.

2. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).”

3. The clerk will then close the file.

SO ORDERED on April 19, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00584-AW-MAF Document 18 Filed 04/19/21 Page 2 of 2
§ 4288.113 Payment record requirements. To be eligible for Program payments, an advanced biofuel producer must maintain records for all relevant fiscal years and fiscal year quarters for each advanced biofuel facility indicating: ( a ) The type of eligible renewable biomass used in the production of advanced biofuel;
( b ) The quantity of advanced biofuel produced from eligible renewable biomass at each advanced biofuel facility;
( c ) The quantity of eligible renewable biomass used at each advanced biofuel facility to produce the advanced biofuel; and
( d ) All other records required to establish Program eligibility and compliance.
#### § 58.53 Supervisor of packaging required.

The official identification of any inspected or graded product, as provided in §§ 58.50 through 58.52, this section, and §§ 58.54 through 58.57, shall be done only under the supervision of a supervisor of packaging. The authority to use official identification may be granted by the Administrator only to applicants who utilize the services of a supervisor of packaging in accordance with this subpart. The supervisor of packaging shall have jurisdiction over the use and handling of all packaging material bearing any official identification.
Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 13 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 707.4 Disappearance. ( a ) Where any person who would otherwise be eligible to receive a payment disappears before the payment is received, payment may be released in accordance with this section so long as, and only if, a timely program application has been filed by that person before the disappearance or filed timely before or after the disappearance by someone legally authorized to act for the person involved. Timeliness will be determined under the relevant program regulations. All program conditions for payment under the relevant program regulations must have been met for the person involved to be considered otherwise eligible for the payment. However, the payment will not be made unless, in addition, a separate release application is filed in accordance with § 707.7. If these conditions are met, payment may be released without regard to the claims of creditors other than the United States, in accordance with the following order of precedence: ( 1 ) The conservator or liquidator of his estate, if one be duly appointed.
( 2 ) The spouse.
( 3 ) An adult son or daughter or grandchild for the benefit of his estate.
( 4 ) The mother or father for the benefit of his estate.
( 5 ) An adult brother or sister for the benefit of his estate.
( 6 ) Such person as may be authorized under State law to receive payment for the benefit of his estate.
( b ) A person shall be deemed to have disappeared if ( 1 ) he has been missing for a period of more than 3 months,
( 2 ) a diligent search has failed to reveal his whereabouts, and
( 3 ) such person has not communicated during such period with other persons who would be expected to have heard from him. Evidence of such disappearance must be presented to the county committee in the form of a statement executed by the person making the application for payment, setting forth the above facts, and must be substantiated by a statement from a disinterested person who was well acquainted with the person who has disappeared.
[30 FR 6246, May 5, 1965, as amended at 75 FR 81835, Dec. 29, 2010]