alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONI, Lawrence E. Kreider, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. (the“Company”), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify asfollows:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2011 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and2. The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 10th day of May, 2011.   /s/ LAWRENCE E. KREIDER, JR. Lawrence E. Kreider, Jr., Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2915 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2915

    To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve screening for 
    colorectal cancer for TRICARE beneficiaries over the age of 50.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Biden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve screening for 
    colorectal cancer for TRICARE beneficiaries over the age of 50.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENHANCEMENT OF COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING FOR TRICARE 
              BENEFICIARIES OVER AGE 50.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 1074d of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(3) Members and former members of the uniformed services 
described in paragraph (1) or (2) who are 50 years of age or older 
shall also be entitled to the colorectal cancer screening tests 
described in section 1861(pp)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1935x(pp)(1)) with such frequency as tests for which payment would be 
authorized under section 1834(d) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 1935m(d)) 
without regard to whether such members or former members are at high 
risk for colorectal cancer (as described in section 1861(pp)(2) of that 
Act) or have otherwise previously exhibited any symptom of or 
associated with colorectal cancer.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (b)(8) of such section is 
amended by striking ``subsection (a)(2)'' and inserting ``paragraphs 
(2) and (3) of subsection (a)''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 635.7 Procedures for granting equitable relief. ( a ) The Chief or State Conservationist may initiate a request for equitable relief for a participant that meets the requirement of this part.
( b ) Participants may request equitable relief from the Chief or the State Conservationist as provided in §§ 635.3 and 635.4 of this part.
( c ) Only a participant directly affected by the non-compliance with the covered program requirements is eligible for equitable relief under this part.
( d ) Requests by a participant for equitable relief must be made in writing, no later than 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of the notification of non-compliance with the requirements of the covered conservation program.
( e ) Requests for equitable relief must include any information necessary to determine eligibility under this part and such other information as required by NRCS to determine whether granting equitable relief is appropriate. Information needed by the agency to assess equitable relief requests will be provided and updated by applicable policy and procedure.
( f ) If equitable relief is denied by the Chief or the State Conservationist, the participant will be provided with written notice of appeal rights to the National Appeals Division, pursuant to 7 CFR part 614.
§ 763.1 Introduction. ( a ) *Purpose.* The Land Contract Guaranteed Program provides certain financial guarantees to the seller of a farm through a land contract sale to a beginning farmer or a socially disadvantaged farmer.
( b ) *Types of guarantee.* The seller may request either of the following: ( 1 ) *The prompt payment guarantee plan.* The Agency will guarantee an amount not to exceed three amortized annual installments plus an amount equal to the total cost of any related real estate taxes and insurance incurred during the period covered by the annual installment; or
( 2 ) *The standard guarantee plan.* The Agency will guarantee an amount equal to 90 percent of the outstanding principal under the land contract.
( c ) *Guarantee period.* The guarantee period is 10 years for either plan regardless of the term of the land contract.
52.236-7 Permits and Responsibilities.

As prescribed in 36.507 , insert the following clause:

Permits and Responsibilities (Nov 1991)

The Contractor shall, without additional expense to the Government, be responsible for obtaining

any necessary licenses and permits, and for complying with any Federal, State, and municipal laws,

codes, and regulations applicable to the performance of the work. The Contractor shall also be

responsible for all damages to persons or property that occur as a result of the Contractor’s fault or

negligence. The Contractor shall also be responsible for all materials delivered and work performed

until completion and acceptance of the entire work, except for any completed unit of work which

may have been accepted under the contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.236 [Reserved]
#### § 6.21 Definitions.

As used in this subpart and the appendices thereto, the following terms are defined as follows:

*Article.* One of the products listed in Appendices 1, 2, or 3, which are the same as those described in Additional U.S. Notes 6, 7, 8, 12, 14, 16-23 and 25 to Chapter 4 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule.

*Article other than cheese or cheese products.* Any article that is a dairy product, but not a cheese or cheese product.

*CBP.* United States Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

*Cheese or cheese products.* Articles in headings 0406, 1901.90.34, and 1901.90.36 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule.

*Commercial entry.* Any entry except those made by or for the account of the United States Government or for a foreign government, for the personal use of the importer or for sampling, taking orders, research, or the testing of equipment.

*Country.* Country of origin as determined in accordance with CBP rules and regulations, except that “EC”, and “Other countries” shall each be treated as a country.

*DAIRIES.* The “Dairy Accelerated Importer Retrieval and Information Exchange System”. The web-based user interface system which persons must utilize to apply for and manage licenses, and through which the Licensing Authority will communicate all program notices.

*Dairy products.* Articles in headings 0401 through 0406, margarine cheese listed under headings 1901.90.34 and 1901.90.36, ice cream listed under heading 2105, and casein listed under heading 3501 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule.

*Department.* The United States Department of Agriculture.

*EC.* Those countries listed in Additional U.S. Note 2 to Chapter 4 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule.

*Enter or Entry.* To make or making entry for consumption, or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption in accordance with CBP regulations and procedures.

*Harmonized Tariff Schedule or HTS.* The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.

*Licensee.* A person to whom a license has been issued under this subpart.

*Licensing Authority.* Any officer or employee of the U.S. Department of Agriculture designated to act in this position by the Director of the Division charged with managing the Dairy Tariff-Rate Quota Import Licensing System.

*Other countries.* Countries not listed by name as having separate tariff-rate quota allocations for an article.

*Person.* An individual, firm, corporation, partnership, association, trust, estate or other legal entity.

*Process or processing.* Any additional preparation of a dairy product, such as melting, grating, shredding, cutting and wrapping, or blending with any additional ingredient.

*Quota year.* The 12-month period beginning on January 1 of a given year.

*Tariff-rate quota amount or TRQ amount.* The amount of an article subject to the applicable in-quota rate of duty established under a tariff-rate quota.

*United States.* The customs territory of the United States, which is limited to the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.

[80 FR 44254, July 27, 2015]
#### § 652.35 Deputy Chief of Programs decision.

Within 40 calendar days from the date of the notice of proposed decertification, the Deputy Chief for Programs will issue a written determination. If the Deputy Chief for Programs decides to decertify, the decision will set forth the reasons for decertification, the period of decertification, and the scope of decertification. If the Deputy Chief for Programs decides not to decertify the technical service provider, the technical service provider will be given written notice of that determination. The decertification determination will be based on an administrative record, which will be comprised of the Notice of Proposed Decertification and supporting documents, and if submitted, the technical service provider's written response and supporting documentation. Both a copy of the decision and administrative record will be sent promptly by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the technical service provider.

[79 FR 44640, Aug. 1, 2014]
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J.Chris Boswell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ J. CHRIS BOSWELL      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| J. Chris Boswell          |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |   |
| * *                  |   |
| Date: August 7, 2007      |

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Particle DrillingTechnologies, Inc. and will be retained by Particle DrillingTechnologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

22

----
#### § 66.400 Prohibited act.

It is a violation of 7 U.S.C. 1639b for any person to knowingly fail to make a bioengineered food disclosure in accordance with this part.
|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |

| **CDC Contents**In the NewsTravelers' HealthHealth Topics A-ZPublications, Software & ProductsData & StatisticsTraining & EmploymentSubscriptionsOther SitesVisitor Survey |  | **Funding**

CDC's Procurement and Grants Office    (PGO) is responsible for: 1) the awarding and administration of CDC’s grants and    cooperative agreements and those of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry    (ATSDR); 2) the acquisition of program related health studies, professional services and    research and development; and 3) the procurement of services, equipment, commodities,    construction, and architectural and engineering services for CDC Programs. - Notices and Public Comment 
- Grants and Cooperative Agreements
- RFP Solicitations      
Privacy Policy Notice
About CDC | Announcements | Funding | Publications |    Contact Us

CDC Home | Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page last    reviewed July 27, 2000

United States Department of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER JON PERGROSSI,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-194-AW-GRJ

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This is one of the many frivolous pro se cases Christopher Jon Pergrossi has 

recently filed in this court. I have considered the magistrate judge’s omnibus order 

to show cause and report and recommendation. ECF No. 4. No objections were 

filed.* I agree with the magistrate judge that the action is frivolous and has wasted 

court resources. On the issue of sanctions, the judge in the first-filed case found it to 

be a close call but did not impose sanctions. See No. 1:20-cv-181-MW-GRJ, ECF 

No. 7. I will likewise not impose sanctions at this time.

The clerk will enter judgment that says, “This case is DISMISSED without 

leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).” The clerk will close the file.

* In another of his cases, Pergrossi filed an objection to the omnibus Report 

and Recommendation. See No. 1:20-cv-181-MW-GRJ, ECF No. 6. Although he did 

not file that objection (or any objection) in this case, I have nonetheless considered 

de novo the issues raised in that objection. 

Case 1:20-cv-00194-AW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 10/05/20 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED on October 5, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00194-AW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 10/05/20 Page 2 of 2
52.214-14 Place of Performance-Sealed Bidding.       As prescribed in 14.201-6(h), insert the following provision:          Place of Performance-Sealed Bidding (Apr 1985)                                       (a)                    						            The bidder, in the performance of any contract resulting from this solicitation, □ intends, □ does not intend [*check applicable box*] to use one or more plants or facilities located at a different address from the address of the bidder as indicated in this bid.                                          (b)                    						            If the bidder checks "intends" in paragraph (a) of this provision, it shall insert in the spaces provided below the required information:                                 Place of Performance (Street Address, City, State, County, ZIP Code)                      Name and Address of Owner and Operator of the Plant or Facility if Other than Bidder____________________                      ________________________________________                      ____________________(End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.214 [Reserved]
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 3 0 8 5 4 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. M I C H A E L V E S P A , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e W e s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f L o u i s i a n a U S D C N o
. 6 : 0 9

- C R

- 6

- 1

B e f o r e D E N N I S , C L E M E N T , a n d E L R O D , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e a t t o r n e y a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t M i c h a e l V e s p a h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. V e s p a h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e

r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s

e x c u s e d f

r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 12, 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-30854 Document: 00511202389 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/12/2010
§ 769.109 Intermediary lender's application. ( a ) The application will consist of: ( 1 ) An application form provided by the Agency;
( 2 ) A draft Intermediary Relending Agreement and other evidence the Agency requires to show the feasibility of the intermediary lender's program to meet the objectives of the HFIL Loan Program; and
( 3 ) Applications from intermediary lenders that already have an active HFIL loan may be streamlined by filing a new application and a statement that the new loan would be operated in accordance with the Intermediary Relending Agreement on file for the previous loan. This statement may be submitted at the time of application in lieu of a new Intermediary Relending Agreement.
( 4 ) Documentation of the intermediary lender's ability to administer HFIL in accordance with this part;
( 5 ) Submission of a completed Agency application form;
( 6 ) Prior to approval of a loan or advance of funds, certification of whether or not the intermediary lender is delinquent on any Federal debt, including, but not limited to, Federal income tax obligations or a loan or loan guarantee or from another Federal agency. If delinquent, the intermediate lender must explain the reasons for the delinquency, and the Agency will take such written explanation into consideration in deciding whether to approve the loan or advance of funds;
( 7 ) Prior to approval of a loan or advance of funds, certification as to whether the intermediary lender has been convicted of a felony criminal violation under Federal law in the 24 months preceding the date of application.
( 8 ) Certification of compliance with the restrictions and requirements in 31 U.S.C. 1352, and 2 CFR 200.450 and part 418.
( 9 ) Certification to having been informed of the collection options the Federal government may use to collect delinquent debt.
( b ) An intermediary lender that has received one or more HFIL loans may apply for and be considered for subsequent HFIL loans provided: ( 1 ) The intermediary lender is relending all collections from loans made from its revolving fund in excess of what is needed for required debt service, approved administration costs, and a reserve for debt service;
( 2 ) The outstanding loans of the intermediary lender's HFIL revolving fund are performing; and
( 3 ) The intermediary lender is in compliance with all regulations and its loan agreements with the Agency.
237.503 Agency-head responsibilities.       (c)  The agency head or designee shall employ procedures to ensure that requirements for service contracts are vetted and approved as a safeguard to prevent contracts from being awarded or administered in a manner that constitutes an unauthorized personal services contract.  Contracting officers shall follow the procedures at PGI                 237.503             , include substantially similar certifications in conjunction with service contract requirements, and place the certification in the contract file.  The program manager or other official responsible for the requirement, at a level specified by the agency, should execute the certification.  In addition, contracting officers and program managers should remain aware of the descriptive elements at FAR 37.104(d) to ensure that a service contract does not inadvertently become administered as a personal-services contract.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 237.5 - MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT OF SERVICE CONTRACTS
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 12 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 12 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 12 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 12 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 4 of 4
52.215-8 Order of Precedence-Uniform

Contract Format.

As prescribed in 15.209(h), insert the following clause:

Order of Precedence-uniform Contract Format (Oct 1997)

Any inconsistency in this solicitation or contract shall be resolved by giving precedence in the

following order:

(a) The Schedule (excluding the specifications).

(b) Representations and other instructions.

(c) Contract clauses.

(d) Other documents, exhibits, and attachments.

(e) The specifications.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.215 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2715 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2715

     To temporarily suspend the duty on certain clock radio combos.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2006

 Mrs. Lincoln introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To temporarily suspend the duty on certain clock radio combos.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLOCK RADIO COMBOS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.85.27      Reception           Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         apparatus for                                                      31/2009
                         radiotelephony,
                         radiotelegraphy
                         or radio
                         broacdasting,
                         containing a
                         clock or clock
                         timer (provided
                         for in subheading
                         8527.19.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```