alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 5:88cr05040/RV

KUNTA ALLAH MUWWAKILL

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Roger Vinson on June 9, 2005

Motion/Pleadings: Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis 

Filed by Defendant on 6/2/2005 Doc.# 200 

RESPONSES:

 United States on 6/9/2005 Doc.# 201

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 10th day of

 June , 2005, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 /s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 5:88-cr-05040-RV-EMT Document 202 Filed 06/15/05 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,035,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,286,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   551,000
<INVENTORY>                                 27,320,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,934,000
<PP&E>                                      23,187,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,293,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,707,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,332,000
<BONDS>                                     13,594,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,517,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,765,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,707,000
<SALES>                                     42,660,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,660,000
<CGS>                                       26,840,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,604,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (42,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             686,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,438,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,330,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,330,000 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,330,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.49
        

</TABLE>
#### § 65.210 Person.

*Person* means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity.
52.219-32 Orders Issued Directly Under

Small Business Reserves

As prescribed in 19.507(g)(2), insert the following clause:

Orders Issued Directly Under Small Business Reserves (Mar 2020)

(a) Applicability. This clause applies only to contracts that were reserved for any of the small

business concerns identified at 19.000(a)(3).

(b) If there is only one contract award to any one type of small business concern identified in

19.000(a)(3) as a result of the reserve, the Contracting Officer may issue an order or orders directly

to the concern.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.219 [Reserved]
§ 51.2948 U.S. No. 1. “U.S. No. 1” consists of walnuts in shells which are dry, practically clean, bright and free from splits, injury by discoloration, and free from damage caused by broken shells, perforated shells, adhering hulls or other means. The kernels are well dried, free from decay, dark discoloration, rancidity, and free from damage caused by mold, shriveling, insects or other means. (See § 51.2954.) ( a ) Kernel color shall be specified in connection with this grade in terms of “extra light,” “light,” “light amber,” or “amber” from the USDA Walnut Color Chart or in terms of “red” color. The color classifications in the USDA Walnut Color Chart shall not apply to “red” color. Furthermore, “red” color shall not be mixed with “extra light,” “light,” “light amber,” or “amber” colors. When kernel color is based on the color classifications from the USDA Walnut Color Chart, at least 70 percent, by count, of the walnuts have kernels which are not darker than “light amber,” and which are free from grade defects: *Provided,* That at least four-sevenths of the above amount, or 40 percent of the walnuts have kernels which are not darker than “light.” Higher percentages of nuts with kernels not darker than “light amber” which are free from grade defects and/or higher percentages with kernels not darker than “light” which are free from grade defects, may be specified in accordance with the facts. (See § 51.2954.)
( b ) Size shall be specified in connection with the grade. (See § 51.2952.)
[29 FR 12865, Sept. 12, 1964. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 82 FR 39657, Aug. 22, 2017]
RICHARD BEASLEY

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2030

Opinion filed September 13, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Richard Beasley, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petiti on for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the merits.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
52.228-10 Vehicular and General Public Liability Insurance.       As prescribed in 28.313(b), insert a clause substantially the same as the following in solicitations and contracts for transportation or for transportation-related services when the contracting officer determines that vehicular liability or general public liability insurance required by law is not sufficient:          Vehicular and General Public Liability Insurance (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            The Contractor, at the Contractor’s expense, agrees to maintain, during the continuance of this contract, vehicular liability and general public liability insurance with limits of liability for-                                                         (1) Bodily injury of not less than $______ for each person and $______ for each occurrence; and                                                            (2) Property damage of not less than $______ for each accident and $______ in the aggregate.                                                                             (b) 						            The Contractor also agrees to maintain workers’ compensation and other legally required insurance with respect to the Contractor’s own employees and agents.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.228 [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MARK PETERS and KAREN WISE

VS CASE NO. 3:20-cv-05785-TKW-EMT

COSCO & ASSOCIATES INC. 

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to and at the direction of the Court, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff take nothing and that judgment 

be entered in favor of Defendant, COSCO & ASSOCIATES INC.

 January 19, 2022

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT

/s/ `ÉÇ|vt UÜÉâáátÜw

DATE Deputy Clerk: Monica Broussard

Case 3:20-cv-05785-TKW-EMT Document 28 Filed 01/19/22 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **Certification    of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, William J. Gervais, Chief Executive Officer of Qualstar    Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,    18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:     (1) the Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31,    2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company. /s/  WILLIAM    J. GERVAIS    William J. Gervais    Chief Executive Officer     Dated: February 13, 2006
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302

I, Thomas E.
Hughes, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Zafgen, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 29, 2016



|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas E. Hughes                                                  
|Thomas E. Hughes Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 550.123 Financial reporting. The Cooperator must submit financial reports at the interval required by the REE Agency, as identified on the Award Face Sheet, and may submit financial reports to the ADO electronically (refer to 2 CFR 200.335 Methods for collection, transmission, and storage of information). ( a ) The OMB-approved SF-425, “Federal Financial Report,” may be used to report the financial status of an award; however, a financial report must contain an itemization of actual dollar amounts expended on the project during the reporting period (in line with the approved budget), and cumulative totals expended for each budget category from the start date of the award.
( b ) Financial reporting due dates: ( 1 ) Quarterly and semi-annual reports are due no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period.
( 2 ) Annual reports are due no later than 90 days following the end of the award anniversary date (*i.e.,* one year following the month and day when the period of performance begins, and each year thereafter up until a final report is required).
( c ) Final financial report: ( 1 ) Requests for extensions must be submitted to the ADO.
( 2 ) Regardless of Agency-provided extensions for submission of the final financial report, funds will not be available for any drawdowns/payments that exceed statutory limits, as well as any expiring appropriations.
#### Assunta Galietti, Respondent, v John Galietti, Appellant.

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the appeals (by permission) are from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 8, 1978, and August 3, 1979, respectively, which ordered the appellant to continue support payments to petitioner. Orders reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and support payments are terminated. Once appellant husband had obtained a judgment of separation against petitioner wife on the ground of her abandonment, continuing support was improper pursuant to section 236 of the Domestic Relations Law. Special Term’s judgment of separation superseded and abated the existing Family Court orders even as to arrears *(Matter of Mammon v Mammon,*54 AD2d 762). Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW     Document 559-2      Filed 02/11/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW     Document 559-2      Filed 02/11/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW     Document 559-2      Filed 02/11/2008     Page 3 of 3
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 279

AN ACT

To amend the Act of June 7, 1924, to provide for the

exercise of criminal jurisdiction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INDIAN PUEBLO LAND ACT AMENDMENTS.

4 The Act of June 7, 1924 (43 Stat. 636, chapter 331),

5 is amended by adding at the end the following:
 †

2

S 279 ES

1 ‘‘SEC. 20. CRIMINAL JURISDICTION.

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided by

3 Congress, jurisdiction over offenses committed anywhere

4 within the exterior boundaries of any grant from a prior

5 sovereign, as confirmed by Congress or the Court of Pri6 vate Land Claims to a Pueblo Indian tribe of New Mexico,

7 shall be as provided in this section.

8 ‘‘(b) JURISDICTION OF THE PUEBLO.—The Pueblo

9 has jurisdiction, as an act of the Pueblos’ inherent power

10 as an Indian tribe, over any offense committed by a mem11 ber of the Pueblo or an Indian as defined in title 25, sec12 tions 1301(2) and 1301(4), or by any other Indian-owned

13 entity.

14 ‘‘(c) JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES.—The

15 United States has jurisdiction over any offense described

16 in chapter 53 of title 18, United States Code, committed

17 by or against an Indian as defined in title 25, sections

18 1301(2) and 1301(4) or any Indian-owned entity, or that

19 involves any Indian property or interest.

20 ‘‘(d) JURISDICTION OF THE STATE OF NEW MEX21 ICO.—The State of New Mexico shall have jurisdiction

22 over any offense committed by a person who is not a mem23 ber of a Pueblo or an Indian as defined in title 25, sections
†

3

S 279 ES

1 1301(2) and 1301(4), which offense is not subject to the

2 jurisdiction of the United States.’’.

Passed the Senate July 26, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 279

AN ACT

To amend the Act of June 7, 1924, to provide for

the exercise of criminal jurisdiction.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 60 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

Case 3:20-cv-05852-MCR-MJF Document 4 Filed 09/29/20 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 3:20-cv-05852-MCR-MJF Document 4 Filed 09/29/20 Page 2 of 2
Jose 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 19, 2014

No. 04-13-00888-CV

SPECIALTY SELECT CARE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO LLC

d/b/a Casa Rio Healthcare and Rehabilitation,

Appellant

v.

Jose FLORES, as next friend of Julie Flores,

Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-04577

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Appellant has filed a motion to abate this appeal because one of the issues presented in 

the appeal is the same issue pending in petitions for review filed in Williamsburg Care Co. L.P. 

v. Acosta, 406 S.W.3d 711 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed), Fredericksburg Care Co. 

L.P. v. Lira, 407 S.W.3d 810 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed), and Fredericksburg 

Care Co. L.P. v. Perez, 406 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed). This court 

has considered the motion, the appellee’s response, and the appellant’s reply to the appellee’s 

response. In light of the pending higher court review of the precedent previously established by 

this court, the court has determined that abating this appeal pending the Texas Supreme Court’s 

resolution of the issue will likely achieve the greatest judicial efficiency. Accordingly, 

appellant’s motion to abate is GRANTED. For administrative purposes, this appeal will be 

treated as a closed case, unless and until appellant files a motion requesting its reinstatement 

following the Texas Supreme Court’s resolution of the issue.

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file reply brief is DENIED AS MOOT.

It is so ORDERED on March 19, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 9 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:03-cr-00140-RV Document 472 Filed 04/13/09 Page 1 of 2Case 3:03-cr-00140-RV Document 472 Filed 04/13/09 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 5:02cr52-001/MCR &

5:03cr53-003/MCR

JESSE SMITH

 

ORDER

The defendant is charged with violation of supervised release. At first

appearance held on July 26, 2007, it was determined that defendant should be

detained pursuant to the decision of the Magistrate Judge made in the District of

Nevada, on July 5, 2007. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of July, 2007.

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:03-cr-00052-MCR Document 70 Filed 07/26/07 Page 1 of 1
**Docket No. FAA -**  **2015 -**  **0682**
47.403 Guidelines for implementation of the Fly America Act.       This section 47.403 is based on the	Guidelines for Implementation of the Fly America Act (case number B-138942), issued	by the Comptroller General of the United States on March 31,1981.    **47.403-1 Availability and unavailability of U.S.-flag air carrier service.****47.403-2 Air transport agreements between the United States and foreign governments.****47.403-3 Disallowance of expenditures.****Parent topic:** Subpart 47.4 - Air Transportation by U.S.-Flag Carriers
[No. 9194.

Department One.

December 5, 1910.]

#### C. H. Green, *Respondent,*v. E. S. Dungan *et al., Appellants.**1*

Appeal — Review—Verdict. A verdict supported by ample and competent testimony will not be reversed on appeal.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered May 28, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

Affirmed.

*Revelle, Revelle <$¡- Revelle,*for appellants.

*Elias A. Wright,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 111 Pac. 1102.

Rudkin, C. J.

The complaint in this action alleged that on or about the 1st day of September, 1908, the plaintiff employed the defendants, as copartners, to make certain real estate investments for him, and agreed to pay them for their services in that behalf a commission of five per cent on the selling price of all property purchased through them; that on or about the 8th day of September, 1908, the defendants purchased certain real property for the plaintiff for the sum of $5,700, but falsely and fraudulently represented to the plaintiff that the purchase price was $6,850 which last mentioned sum the plaintiff paid therefor, and prayed judgment for the difference. The answer denied the agency and the copartnership, and the case came on for trial before a jury, A verdict *66was returned in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $515, and from á judgment on the verdict, the defendants have appealed.

It is conceded that the respondent paid the sum of $515 for the property, over and above the purchase price paid to the vendor and a commission of five per cent on the selling price, and the only error assigned in this court is based on the insufficiency of the evidence to establish the agency *and*the copartnership. These questions were resolved against the appellants by a jury, and their verdict is supported by ample and competent testimony.

The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed.

Fullerton, Mount, Parker, and Gose, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA direct-interface, fusible heat sink for astronaut coolingAstronaut cooling during extravehicular activity is a critical design issue in developing a portable life support system that meets the requirements of a space station mission. Some of the requirements are that the cooling device can be easily regenerable and nonventing during operation. In response to this, a direct-interface, fusible heat sink prototype with freezable quick-disconnects was developed. A proof-of-concept prototype was constructed and tested that consists of an elastic container filled with normal tap water and having two quick-disconnects embedded in a wall. These quick-disconnects are designed so that they may be frozen with the ice and yet still be joined to the cooling system, allowing an immediate flow path. The inherent difficulties in a direct-interface heat sink have been overcome, i.e., (1) establishing an initial flow path; (2) avoiding low-flow freeze-up; and (3) achieving adequate heat-transfer rates at the end of the melting process. The requirements, design, fabrication, and testing are discussed.Document ID19900015976Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsLomax, Curtis*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Webbon, B. W.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1990Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102835A-90189NASA-TM-102835Meeting InformationMeeting: SAE/ICES 20th International Conference on Environmental SystemsLocation: Williamsburg, VACountry: United StatesStart Date: July 9, 1990Accession Number90N25292Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-41-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900015976.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024