alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 755.10 Death, incompetence, or disappearance. ( a ) In the case of the death, incompetency, or disappearance of a person or the dissolution of an entity that is eligible to receive a payment in accordance with this part, such alternate person or persons specified in part 707 of this chapter may receive such payment, as determined appropriate by FSA.
( b ) Payments may be made to an otherwise eligible producer who is now deceased or to a dissolved entity if a representative who currently has authority to enter into an application for the producer or the producer's estate signs the application for payment. Proof of authority over the deceased producer's estate or a dissolved entity must be provided.
( c ) If a producer is now a dissolved general partnership or joint venture, all members of the general partnership or joint venture at the time of dissolution or their duly authorized representatives must be identified in the application for payment.
#### § 510.5 Denials.

If the FOIA Coordinator determines that a requested record is exempt from mandatory disclosure and that discretionary release would be improper, the FOIA Coordinator shall give written notice of denial in accordance with § 1.7(a) of this title.
52.301-2 Matrix Notes

Note 1:

The following clauses are prescribed for use in letter contracts:

52.216-23, Execution and Commencement of

Work.

52.216-26, Payments of Allowable Costs

Before Definitization.

52.216-24, Limitation of Government Liability. 52.232-16, Progress Payments, Alternate

II.

52.216-25, Contract Definitization. 52.244-2, Subcontracts.

52.216-25, Contract Definitization, Alternate I.

Further instructions concerning provisions and clauses for letter contracts are set forth in

16.603-4(a).

Note 2:

The following clauses are prescribed for use in Small Business Administration 8(a) contracts:

52.219-11, Special 8(a) Contract Conditions. 52.219-18, Notification of Competition

Limited to Eligible 8(a) Concerns.

52.219-12, Special 8(a) Subcontract Conditions. 52.219-18, Alternate I

52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting.

52.219-17, Section 8(a) Award.

Note 3:

FAR provisions and clauses not identified on the matrix may be used in contracts for

commercial items consistent with the procedures and limitations in FAR 12.302
Note 4:

The following clause is prescribed for use in Information Technology Management Reform Act

(ITMRA) contracts:

52.239-1, Privacy or Security Safeguards. "A".

Parent topic: 52.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses (Matrix).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

Civil Hearing Minutes

Honorable Hope T. Cannon, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case Style: IN RE: Skanska USA Civil Southeast Inc and Skanska USA Inc 

Case No.: 3:20-cv-5980/LAC-HTC

Date: July 14, 2021

Hearing: Discovery Status Conference

__________________________________________________________________

Time Commenced: 10:00 a.m. 

Time Concluded: 11:19 a.m. 

Court Reporter: David Deik, Phipps Court Reporting

Attorneys present for Petitioners:

Jeremy Branning

Elizabeth Billhimer

Scott Remington

Attorneys present for Claimants:

Sam Geisler

Brian Barr

Jeff Gill

Stephen Echsner

Hannah Rodgers Pfeifler

Matthew Massey

Participating telephonically:

Charles Blanchard, Esquire, Skanska

Robert Kelly, AUSA, DOJ

PROCEEDINGS:

10:00 a.m. Court in session.

Status conference on matters relating to discovery.

11:19 a.m. Court adjourned.

__________________

Filed in Open Court/DCR

 July 14, 2021

Deputy Clerk: Keri Igney

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1206 Filed 07/14/21 Page 1 of 1
# 52.216-13 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.216 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN IN RE SKANSKA USA

CIVIL SOUTHEAST INC. AND

SKANSKA USA, INC., AS

OWNERS OF THE BARGE KS ADMIRALTY RULE 9(H)

5531 PRAYING FOR

EXONERATION FROM OR Case No.: 3:20cv5980/LAC/HTC

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 

___________________________________/

ORDER SETTING HEARING

Pending before the Court is Claimants’ Motion for Order Governing

Production of Documents and Electronically Stored Information (ECF Doc.

1145). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Magistrate Judge Hope Thai Cannon will conduct a hearing on the

motion on Tuesday, May 18, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. (CDT) in Courtroom 3 North of

the United States District Courthouse, 1 North Palafox Street, Pensacola,

Florida, 32502.

2. The parties should arrive fully prepared to reach agreement as to all

aspects of the motion, after which the Court will issue an ESI Order, with the

expectation that the parties will then exchange discovery without further

unnecessary delay.

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1148 Filed 05/13/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. Any party desiring the services of a court reporter will be responsible

for procuring such services.

4. Should the parties resolve this matter before the hearing, or otherwise

narrow the issues to be heard, they shall promptly inform the Court in advance of

the hearing date.

ORDERED on this 13th day of May, 2021.

 s/L.A. Collier 

 Lacey A. Collier

 Senior United States District Judge

NOTE: If you or any party, witness, or attorney in this matter have a

disability that requires special accommodation, such as a hearing impairment

that requires a sign-language interpreter or a wheelchair restriction that

requires ramp access, please contact the clerk’s office at least one (1) week

prior to the hearing (or as soon as possible) so arrangements can be made.

Case No.: 3:20cv5980/LAC/HTC

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1148 Filed 05/13/21 Page 2 of 2
#### §§ 4287.314-4287.322 [Reserved]
#### § 51.1444 Well developed.

*Well developed* means that the kernel is full-meated through its width and length.
The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1 District of Missouri, adopting the Report and Recomme ndation of the Honorable Terry I. Adelman, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-4336

___________ Johnathan Cole, * * Appellant, * * App eal from the United States Distric t v. * Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

. * James Purkett, Superintendent at * [UNPUBLISHED] Farmington Correctional Center, * * Appellee. * *

___________ Submitted: May 15, 1998 Filed: July 8, 1998

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Johnathan Cole appeals the district court's denial of his pro se petition for a writ 1 of habeas c orpus. He claims that the prosecution's evidence in his state trial was s o constitutio nally insufficient as to deny him due process of law under the Fourteenth Amen dment. Specifically, Cole argues that the testimony of four police officers whoWe grant Cole's motion to supplement the record with a copy of the videotape 2 admitted into evidence at his trial. -2- claim to have seen him in possessio n of cocaine is inconsistent with a videotape of the drug transaction and Cole's subsequent arrest. The inconsistency, argues Cole, resulted in a verdic t unsupported by substantial evidence. The district court held that th e officers' credibility and inconsistencies in the test imony were questions for the jury and did not go to the submissibili ty of the state's case. After carefully reviewing the entire record, including the videotape, the trial transcripts, and the parties' briefs, w e 2 conc lude that the judgment of the district court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. ATTEST: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 763.16 Environmental regulation compliance. ( a ) *Environmental compliance requirements.* The environmental requirements contained in part 799 of this chapter must be met prior to approval of guarantee request.
( b ) *Determination.* The Agency determination of whether an environmental problem exists will be based on: ( 1 ) The information supplied with the application;
( 2 ) Environmental resources available to the Agency including, but not limited to, documents, third parties, and government agencies;
( 3 ) Other information supplied by the buyer or seller upon Agency request; and
( 4 ) A visit to the farm.
[76 FR 75430, Dec. 2, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 51284, Aug. 3, 2016]
#### § 58.343 Storage of finished product in coolers.

All products shall be kept under refrigeration at temperatures of 40 °F. or lower after packaging and until ready for distribution or shipment. The products shall not be placed directly on floors or exposed to foreign odors or conditions such as drippage due to condensation which might cause package or product damage.
Exhibit 35.2


                                                     [LOGO] Countrywide(R)
                                                     ---------------------
                                                          HOME LOANS

                                                     400 Countrywide Way
February 28, 2007                             Simi Valley, California 93065-6298

DEUTSCHE BANK
1761 E ST ANDREW PL
SANTA ANA, CA 92705
Katie Wannenmacher

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

I, Joseph Candelario, hereby certify that I am an officer of Countrywide GP,
Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (the "Servicer"). I
further certify, with respect to the applicable servicing agreement relating to
the securitization transaction(s) set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto (the
"Servicing Agreement") that:

      (a) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
      calendar year and of the performance of the Servicer under the Servicing
      Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

      (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all
      material respects throughout such year.


/s/ Joseph Candelario      February 28, 2007
---------------------      -----------------
Joseph Candelario
First Vice President
Compliance Officer
Loan Administration

         See Deal Name listing on following page.

<PAGE>

Exhibit A

MSAC 2006-HE4
ISAC 2006-2 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-3 (Subserviced)
GSAA 2006-10 (SUB)
GSAA 2006-11
GSAA 2006-16
GSAA 2006-17
GSAA 2006-4
GSAA 2006-4 (SUB)
GSAA 2006-7 SUB
GSAA 2006-8
GSAA 2006-8 (SUB)
GSAA 2006-9
GSR 2006-OA1
HALO 2006-2
HARBORVIEW 2006-2
HARBORVIEW 2006-3
HARBORVIEW 2006-5
HARBORVIEW 2006-6
HARBORVIEW 2006-9
MSAC 2006-HE5
MSAC 2006-HE6
MSAC 2006-HE7
MSAC 2006-HE8
MSAC 2006-NC5
MSHEL 2006-1
MSHEL 2006-2
MSIX 2005-1
MSIX 2006-2
SOUNDVIEW2006-A
ISAC 2006-1 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-4 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-5 (Subserviced)
HASCO 2006-HE1
HASCO 2006-HE2
#### Benjamin C. Nottingham, Respondent, *v.*Maggie Clark, Appellant.

(Submitted June 29, 1884;

decided October 7, 1884.)

*Waters McLennan c& Dillaye*for appellant.

Pratt, *Brown do Garfield*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
#### § 52.56 Purchase of commodity samples for review.

Employees are authorized to purchase commodity samples for review. Employees must pay and obtain receipts for such purchases and keep receipts subject to inspection by supervisory or other authorized Department employees.

[48 FR 12330, Mar. 24, 1983]
§ 613.5 PMCs. ( a ) *The Norman A. Berg National PMC.* The Norman A. Berg National PMC at Beltsville, Maryland, focuses on national initiatives and provides coordination for plant materials work across all 50 States. In addition, the center provides plants and plant technology to address resource concerns in the mid-Atlantic region.
( b ) *Other PMCs.* There are 26 other PMCs. Each serves several major land resource areas. NRCS operates 24 of these Centers, and 2 by cooperating agencies, as follows: ( 1 ) Operated by NRCS: Tucson, AZ, Booneville, AR, Lockeford, CA, Brooksville, FL, Americus, GA, Molokai, HI, Aberdeen, ID, Manhattan, KS, Galliano, LA, East Lansing, MI, Coffeeville, MS, Elsberry, MO, Bridger, MT, Fallon, NV, Cape May Courthouse, NJ, Los Lunas, NM, Big Flats, NY, Bismarck, ND, Corvallis, OR, Kingsville, TX, Knox City, TX, Nacogdoches, TX, Pullman, WA, and Alderson, WV.
( 2 ) Operated by cooperating agencies with financial and technical assistance from NRCS: Meeker, CO—White River and Douglas Creek Soil Conservation Districts with partial funding from NRCS.
( 3 ) Operated by cooperating agencies with technical assistance from NRCS: Palmer, AK—State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources.
47.303-14 C.i.f. destination.

(a) Explanation of delivery term."C.i.f. (Cost, insurance, freight) destination" means free of expense

to the Government delivered on board the ocean vessel to the specified point of destination, with the

cost of transportation and marine insurance paid by the contractor.

(b) Contractor responsibilities. The contractor’s responsibilities are the same as those listed in

47.303-13(b), except that, in addition, the contractor shall obtain and dispatch to the Government an

insurance policy or certificate providing the amount and extent of marine insurance coverage

specified in the contract or agreed upon by the Government contracting officer.

(c) Contract clause. The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at

52.247-42, C.i.f. (Cost, insurance, freight) Destination, when the delivery term is c.i.f. destination.

Parent topic: 47.303 Standard delivery terms and contract clauses.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER JON PERGROSSI,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-207-AW-GRJ

MIKE POMPEO, as Secretary of State,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This is one of the many frivolous pro se cases Christopher Jon Pergrossi has 

recently filed in this court. I have considered the magistrate judge’s omnibus order 

to show cause and report and recommendation. ECF No. 4. No objections were 

filed.* I agree with the magistrate judge that the action is frivolous and has wasted 

court resources. On the issue of sanctions, the judge in the first-filed case found it to 

be a close call but did not impose sanctions. See No. 1:20-cv-181-MW-GRJ, ECF 

No. 7. I will likewise not impose sanctions at this time.

The clerk will enter judgment that says, “This case is DISMISSED without 

leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).” The clerk will close the file.

* In another of his cases, Pergrossi filed an objection to the omnibus Report 

and Recommendation. See No. 1:20-cv-181-MW-GRJ, ECF No. 6. Although he did 

not file that objection (or any objection) in this case, I have nonetheless considered 

de novo the issues raised in that objection. 

Case 1:20-cv-00207-AW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 10/05/20 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED on October 5, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00207-AW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 10/05/20 Page 2 of 2
#### Janice Rosenthal, an Infant, by Her Father and Natural Guardian, Harold Rosenthal, et al., Respondents, v. Nicholas A. Monastra, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated August 22, 1966, reversed and plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment denied, without costs. The infant plaintiff, 18 years of age at the time of the accident which is the basis of this action, was a passenger in a car owned and operated by defendant. The night was clear and the road dry. The car suddenly swerved off the road. There is no clear explanation in the papers on the motion as to how the accident occurred. In our opinion, it was an improvident exercise of discretion by the learned Special Term to grant plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The issue of negligence and any other relevant issues should be tried and determined by a jury *(Pfaffenbach*v. *White Plains Express Corp.,*17 N Y 2d. 132, and cases there cited). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
#### § 51.314 Clean.

*“Clean”* means that the apples are free from excessive dirt, dust, spray residue, and other foreign material.
05/22/2014 07:53 FAX 202 2875108 

04/24/2010 21:e4 5315885527 EXECUTIVE FLITEWAYS 

141002/003 

PAGE 02/03 

05/20/2014 10;08 FAX 202 2S7510S ~002/00~ 

U.S, DBPQI"'''r'llent 

of Trt111$port0fion 

f<>deral Aviation 

Adminl<1•aflon 

BY ELECTRONIC MAlL a.nd FA.CS1MILE 

May22,20l4 

The H-onorable J.E. SU!IiVllll 

Chief Administu.tive Law Judge 

U.S. Department ofTr1111sportation 

Offic<> of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jeney Avenue, S.E. (Bll-310) 

Washington, DC 

p~, 202-366-753ei 

-&10 lncfepen.dcino. Av.,, r;.w. 

Wl>•hlnoton, o.c. :2ll6S1 

A1""a Code 202-267-7100 

Re; FDMS No. FAA-2013-1 085, FAA ~"""no. 2013S09503 77 

Judge Sullivan' 

On Mil)' 19, 2014, the parties in the abov,. refeiCnced matter agreed to propo.., the following 

procedw·~l schedule ln accordanc~ with your April I, 2014 Rule 26(1) Order: 

• June 19,2014 -CompletiiJII of discovery. 

• July 18, 2014- Filing of stipulation£ atl!l w:itnl!!!ls listo, including Sll1Xl!ll2rles of 

proposed testimony; exchange of exhibits. 

The plll:lio::s have renewed settlement discussions in an snempt to conclude this mZ~t!l:r prior 

to a hearing. · 

The parties have agreed to propose New York. NY tbf the location of the hearing. 

Sincerely, 

PeterLyneh 

Assistant Chief Coun5cl 

By: Jt..~J~f! .. Mlhael F. M.:Kinley -::::::.-~ Senior Attorn~>y 

Offico:~ of the Chief Courn;~l 
05/22/2014 07:53 FAX 202 2675106 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by electronic mail, and/or sent by 

facsimile, copies of this letter in the case of In the Matter of Executive Fliteways, Inc., 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-1085, FAA Case no. 2013S0950377, addressed to: 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Otlice of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 

Fax: 202-366-7536 

ll!i 003/003 

2 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by facsimile one copy of the 

foregoing document to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Fax: 202-493-5142 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by facsimile, copies of the 

foregoing document to: 

Kenneth S. Gray 

Executive Fliteways, Inc. 

One Clark Drive 

Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 

Fax: 631-588-5527 

Dated; May 22,2014 
05/22/2014 07 53 FAX 202 2675106 

TO: 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COUNSEL 

AGC-300- ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

800 INDEPENDENCE A VENUE, S.W. 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20591 

202-267-7158 (VOICE) 202-267-5106 (FAX) 

FACSIMILE TRANSMriTAL SHEET 

FROM: 

FAA Hearing Docket Clerk Michael F. McKinley 

COMPANY: OATil: 

AGC-430 05/22/2014 08:45:23 AM 

FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 

202-493-5142 3 

PHONE NUMBER: SENDER'S PHONE NUMBER: 

202-267-7100 

RE: YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER: 

Executive Fliteways, Inc. FDMS No. FAA-2013·1085 

DURGENT "E)FOR REVIEW D E'LEASE COMMENT D PL~A$E ({EPLY 

NO.IES/COMMENTS: 

Rule 26(f) letter 

li!J001/003
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 404 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 1 of 14
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 404 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 2 of 14
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 404 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 3 of 14
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 404 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 4 of 14
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 404 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 5 of 14
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 404 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 6 of 14
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 404 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 7 of 14
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 404 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 8 of 14
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 404 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 9 of 14
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 404 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 10 of 14
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 404 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 11 of 14
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 404 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 12 of 14
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 404 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 13 of 14
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 404 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 14 of 14
Exhibit 31.3

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer:

I, Guy L. Brenkman certify that:

1.   I have reviewed  this Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Pioneer  Railcorp;
     and

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     report.


Date: April 28, 2005


By: /s/ Guy L. Brenkman
    ----------------------------
    Guy L. Brenkman
    Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 57

#### Editorial Note:

1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

#### § 57.119 Political activity.

Federal inspectors may participate in certain political activities, including management and participation in political campaigns as allowed by Federal regulation and AMS directives. Inspectors are subject to these rules while they are on leave with or without pay, including furlough; however the rules do not apply to cooperative employees not under Federal supervision and intermittent employees on the days they perform no service. Willfull violations of the political activity rules constitute grounds for removal from the service.

[69 FR 57167, Sept. 24, 2004]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BioFuel Energy, Corp. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-K for the annual period
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott H. Pearce, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

/s/ SCOTT H. PEARCE Scott H. Pearce President and Chief Executive Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BioFuel Energy Corp. and will be retained by BioFuel Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
#### § 621.32 How to request assistance.

Applicants for a joint investigation and report should request their congressional representative(s) to initiate appropriate action under Pub. L. 87-639.