alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-170845) pertaining to the NextWave Wireless Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-164796) of NextWave Wireless Inc., |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-144549) pertaining to the NextWave Wireless Inc. 2007 New Employee Stock Incentive Plan, |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-139169) pertaining to the PacketVideo Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan of NextWave Wireless Inc. and, |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-142542) pertaining to the NextWave Wireless Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, Cygnus Communications, Inc. 2004 Stock Option Plan, PacketVideo Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, NextWave Wireless Inc. 2007 New Employee Stock Incentive Plan, GO Networks, Inc. Employee Stock Bonus Plan of NextWave Wireless Inc.; |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
August 31, 2015 

Dear Mr. Newkirk: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA−2015−1836). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 9/14/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
§ 634.21 Eligible participants. ( a ) Any landowner or operator whose land or activities in a project area is contributing to the area's agricultural nonpoint source water quality problems and who has an approved water quality plan is eligible to enter into an RCWP contract.
( b ) This program will be conducted in compliance with all nondiscrimination requirements as contained in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and amendments thereto and the Regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture (7 CFR 15.1 through 15.12).
52.215 [Reserved]

52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors-Competitive Acquisition.

52.215-2 Audit and Records-Negotiation.

52.215-3 Request for Information or Solicitation for Planning Purposes.

52.215-4 [Reserved]

52.215-5 Facsimile Proposals.

52.215-6 Place of Performance.

52.215-7 [Reserved]

52.215-8 Order of Precedence-Uniform Contract Format.

52.215-9 Changes or Additions to Make-or-Buy Program.

52.215-10 Price Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data.

52.215-11 Price Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data-Modifications.

52.215-12 Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Data.

52.215-13 Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Data-Modifications.

52.215-14 Integrity of Unit Prices.

52.215-15 Pension Adjustments and Asset Reversions.

52.215-16 Facilities Capital Cost of Money.

52.215-17 Waiver of Facilities Capital Cost of Money.

52.215-18 Reversion or Adjustment of Plans for Postretirement Benefits (PRB) Other

Than Pensions.

52.215-19 Notification of Ownership Changes.

52.215-20 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other Than

Certified Cost or Pricing Data.

52.215-21 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other Than

Certified Cost or Pricing Data-Modifications.

52.215-22 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges-Identification of Subcontract Effort.

52.215-23 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges.

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
§ 70.13 Ready-to-cook poultry and rabbits and specified poultry food products. ( a ) Ready-to-cook poultry or rabbit carcasses or parts or specified poultry food products may be graded only if they have been inspected and certified by the poultry inspection service of the Department, or inspected and passed by any other inspection system which is acceptable to the Department.
( b ) Only when ready-to-cook poultry carcasses, parts, poultry food products, including those used in preparing raw poultry food products, have been graded on an individual basis by a grader or by an authorized person pursuant to § 70.20(c) and thereafter checkgraded by a grader, and when poultry food products have been prepared under the supervision of a grader, when necessary the individual container, carcass, part, or poultry food product be identified with the appropriate official letter grademark. Checkgrading shall be accomplished in accordance with a statistical sampling plan prescribed by the Administrator. Grading with respect to quality factors for freezing defects and appearance of the finished products, when necessary, shall be done on a sample basis in accordance with a plan prescribed by the Administrator.
( c ) Only when ready-to-cook rabbit carcasses or parts have been graded on an individual basis by a grader or by an authorized person pursuant to § 70.20(c) and thereafter checkgraded by a grader, may the container or the individual carcass or part be identified with the appropriate official letter grademark. Checkgrading shall be accomplished in accordance with a statistical sampling plan prescribed by the Administrator. Grading with respect to quality factors for freezing defects and appearance of the finished products may be done on a sample basis in accordance with a plan prescribed by the Administrator.
[71 FR 42012, July 24, 2006]
47.207-5 Contractor responsibilities.       Contractor responsibilities vary with the kinds of freight to be shipped and services required. The contracting officer shall specify clearly those service requirements that are not considered normal transportation or transportation-related requirements.                                       (a)                   *Type of equipment*. If appropriate, the contracting officer shall specify the type and size of equipment to be furnished by the contractor. Otherwise, state that the contractor shall furnish clean and sound closed-type equipment of sufficient size to accommodate the shipment.                                          (b)                   *Supervision, labor, or materials.* The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 52.247-12, Supervision, Labor, or Materials, when the contractor is required to furnish supervision, labor, or materials.                                          (c)                   *Accessorial services-moving contracts.* The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 52.247-13, Accessorial Services-Moving Contracts, in contracts for the transportation of household goods or office furniture.                                          (d)                   *Receipt of shipment.* The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-14, Contractor Responsibility for Receipt of Shipment.                                          (e)                   *Loading and unloading.* The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-15, Contractor Responsibility for Loading and Unloading, when the contractor is responsible for loading and unloading shipments.                                          (f)                   *Return of undelivered freight.* The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-16, Contractor Responsibility for Returning Undelivered Freight, when the contractor is responsible for returning undelivered freight.    **Parent topic:** 47.207 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and special requirements.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/01 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
Docket Number FAA-2013-0627
#### § 4288.11 Eligible project costs.

Eligible project costs will be only for project related construction costs for repowering improvements associated with the equipment, installation, engineering, design, site plans, associated professional fees, permits and financing fees.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 6, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00226

- CV

Abelardo G. GONZALEZ, Individually and as Next Fri end of M.A.G. and Z.A.G.

, Appellant

v.

Alberto J. GONZALEZ , Sergio R. Gonzalez, Rosalinda Gonzalez, and Diana Gonzalez, Appellees

From the 341st Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CVH001007D3

Honorable Karen H. Pozza , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant, pro se, has filed a motion requesting access to the clerk's record. We grant the motion. We order the clerk of this court to make a copy of the clerk's record and send it to appellant.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed th e seal of the said

court on this 6th day of August, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### § 614.1 General.

This part sets forth the informal appeal procedures under which a participant may appeal adverse technical determinations or program decisions made by officials of the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), an agency under the Department of Agriculture (USDA). These regulations reflect NRCS policy to resolve at the agency level, to the greatest extent possible, disputes arising from adverse technical determinations and program decisions made by NRCS. Once a decision is rendered final by NRCS, participants may appeal to the National Appeals Division (NAD) as provided for under 7 CFR part 11, or to the Farm Service Agency (FSA) county committee pursuant to 7 CFR part 780 for decisions rendered under Title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 3801 *et seq.* (Title XII).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-618-MEF

)

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order (Doc. #25)

filed on March 15, 2007, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. An amended Uniform Scheduling Order

will be entered and the parties shall comply with the deadlines as set forth in that amended

Uniform Scheduling Order.

DONE this the 2nd day of April, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 27 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with this Annual Report of Solar Acquisition Corp., on Form 10-K for
the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Klamka, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)    Such
Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and




(2)   The
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ending
December 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of Solar Acquisition Corp.










Dated:
      April 21,
      2009
                    By:
                    /s/ Peter
      KlamkaPeter
      KlamkaChairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer
                      (Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
37.604 Quality assurance surveillance plans.

Requirements for quality assurance and quality assurance surveillance plans are in subpart 46.4.

The Government may either prepare the quality assurance surveillance plan or require the offerors

to submit a proposed quality assurance surveillance plan for the Government’s consideration in

development of the Government’s plan.

Parent topic: Subpart 37.6 - Performance-Based Acquisition
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel MBRS Score Grant Applications Review.                    

*Date:*                         December 21, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact:*                         Lisa Dunbar, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN12, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-594-2849.                         *dunbarl@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 2, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-30825 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Robert Maley, Respondent, v Steven Grapstein et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[814 NYS2d 716]

In a consolidated action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Steven Grapstein and Barbara Grapstein appeal, as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Agate, J.), dated May 26, 2005, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the motion of the defendants Steven Grapstein and Barbara Grapstein which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against them is granted, and that cause of action is dismissed insofar as asserted against those defendants.

The plaintiff, an employee of a plumbing contractor, allegedly was injured as a result of a fall while making improvements in the second floor bathroom of the residence owned by the appellants. As the owners of the one-family dwelling in which the incident allegedly occurred, the appellants may be held liable pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) only if they directed or controlled the work being performed *(see Siconolfi v Crisci,*11 AD3d 600, 601 [2004]; *Cardace v Fanuzzi,*2 AD3d 557, 558 [2003]; *Saverino v Reiter,*1 AD3d 427 [2003]). The appellants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this regard by demonstrating that they did not supervise the method or the manner in which the work was *649performed *(see Siconolfi v Crisci, supra*at 601; *Mayen v Kalter,*282 AD2d 508, 508-509 [2001]; *cf. Rimoldi v Schanzer,*147 AD2d 541, 545 [1989]). In opposition, the plaintiff submitted no evidence that the appellants directed or controlled the work being performed. Therefore, the Supreme Court erred in denying the appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against them. Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Santucci and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2931 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Magenta 3B–OA Stage. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Magenta 

3B–OA Stage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAGENTA 3B–OA STAGE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.04.28 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Magenta 3B–OA Stage) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2931 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THENORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

LUIS ALBERTO MENDOZA-ALMENDAREZ,

Reg. No. 76696-004,

Petitioner,

v. Case No.: 5:21cv25-RV-HTC

WARDEN W.E. MACKELBURG,

FCI MARIANNA,

Respondent.

/

NOTICE OF EXISTENCE OF RECORDS 

AND REQUEST TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECOD

COMES NOW Respondent and files this notice in response to the 

Court’s Order (Doc. 11). The requested documents exist and Respondent 

asks permission to supplement the record with them as exhibits (attached).

Case 5:21-cv-00025-RV-HTC Document 13 Filed 07/27/21 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted,

JASON R. COODY

Acting United States Attorney

/S Lennard B. Register, III

LENNARD B. REGISTER, III

Assistant United States Attorney

Northern District of Florida

Florida Bar No. 264970

21 East Garden Street, Ste. 400

Pensacola, FL 32502

(850) 444-4000

len.register@usdoj.gov

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH N.D. FLA. LOC. R. 7.1(F)

I hereby certify that this notice complies with the word limitation set forth in 

N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(F). This notice contains 45 words.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 27, 2021, the foregoing was 

filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF filing 

system and that a true copy has been furnished by U.S. mail to Luis 

Alberto Mendoza- Almendarez , Reg. No. 76696-004, FCI Mariana, PO

Box 7007, Marianna, FL32447-7007.

/s Lennard B. Register, III

LENNARD B. REGISTER, III

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 5:21-cv-00025-RV-HTC Document 13 Filed 07/27/21 Page 2 of 2
#### Gibbs v. The State.

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Tried before the Hon. A. D. Sayre.

No counsel marked as appearing for appellant.

*671William C. Fitts, Attorney-General, for■’the State-.

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of arson in the first- degree. The' only error assigned.was the refusal of the court to give to the jury the following written charge requested by the defendant :• If there is a reasonable possibility that some person' other than the defendant may have done tlie. act,..then the defendant is entitled to an acquittal.” The court holds that this charge was properly refused, citing *James v. State,*104 Ala. 21; *Porter v. State,*107 Ala. 27. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Opinion by

Haralson, J.