alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Guardianship of the Person of Darrell Murry, Also Known as Darren Murray. St. Cabrini Home, Inc., Respondent; Mary Murry, Also Known as Mary Murray, Appellant.

Order, Family Court, New York County, entered on November 14, 1978, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Sandler, Markewich and Carro, JJ.
52.229 [Reserved]

52.229-1 State and Local Taxes.

52.229-2 North Carolina State and Local Sales and Use Tax.

52.229-3 Federal, State, and Local Taxes.

52.229-4 Federal, State, and Local Taxes (State and Local Adjustments).

52.229-5 [Reserved]

52.229-6 Taxes-Foreign Fixed-Price Contracts.

52.229-7 Taxes-Fixed-Price Contracts with Foreign Governments.

52.229-8 Taxes-Foreign Cost-Reimbursement Contracts.

52.229-9 Taxes-Cost-Reimbursement Contracts with Foreign Governments.

52.229-10 State of New Mexico Gross Receipts and Compensating Tax.

52.229-11 Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements—Notice and Representation.

52.229-12 Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements.

52.229-13 Taxes—Foreign Contracts in Afghanistan.

52.229-14 Taxes—Foreign Contracts in Afghanistan (North Atlantic Treaty

Organization Status of Forces Agreement).

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE SKANSKA USA CIVIL SOUTHEAST INC 

AND SKANSKA USA INC,

CASE NO. 3:20-cv-5980/LAC/HTC

 

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Lacey Collier on May 20, 2021

Motion: Consent MOTION to Amend/Correct [59] Admiralty Claim

Filed by Claimants on 05/18/21 Doc.# 1154

 Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed X Consented

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT

/s/ Barbara Rogers

Deputy Clerk

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 21st day of 

May, 2021, that:

(a) The relief requested is GRANTED.

(b) The Clerk shall file the First Amended Master Claim of Direct Property Damage

attached to the motion, effective as of the date of this Order. The amendments

are hereby incorporated and effective as to all short form joinders timely filed

in all consolidated cases. 

 s/L.A. Collier 

Lacey A. Collier

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1162 Filed 05/21/21 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                          22,563
<SECURITIES>                                    48,326
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,085
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,158
<INVENTORY>                                        854
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,687
<PP&E>                                          23,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,954
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,588
<SALES>                                         34,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,936
<CGS>                                            8,653
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,502
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   515
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,405
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,361
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,044
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,044
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
        

</TABLE>
#### § 51.754 U.S. No. 1 Bronze.

The requirements for this grade are the same as for U.S. No. 1 except that at least 30 percent, by count, of the fruit shall have more than one-third of their surface, in the aggregate, affected by discoloration. The predominating discoloration on each of these fruits shall be of rust mite type. For tolerances see § 51.760.
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US

LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: Abu Dhabi Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Berlin Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver

Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York

Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rome San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated

offices: Budapest Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com

\\DC - 036787/000001 - 3963868 v1

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

T +1 202 637 5600

F +1 202 637 5910

www.hoganlovells.com

December 21, 2012

By Electronic Mail

Mr. Robert Finamore

Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A. d/b/a LAN Colombia

(“LAN Colombia”) for Amended Exemption Authority (Docket DOT-OST-2008-0390)

Dear Mr. Finamore:

On behalf of Aerovías de Integración Regional, AIRES S.A. d/b/a LAN Colombia

(“LAN Colombia”), we have polled the U.S. carrier representatives served with the above-referenced

Application filed on December 12, 2012, and no carrier has objected to the relief sought therein.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey N. Shane

Patrick R. Rizzi

Counsel for LAN COLOMBIA

cc: robert.wirick@aa.com; francis.heil@aa.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com; jhill@dowlohnes.com;

perkmann@dowlohnes.com; jyoung@yklaw.com; dkirstein@yklaw.com; dan.weiss@united.com;

steve.morrissey@united.com; jonathan.linde@united.com; howard_kass@usairways.com;

rsilverberg@sgbdc.com; JCanny@amerijet.com; jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com; rpommer@atlasair.com;

john@mietuslaw.com; kelli.bryan@evergreenairlines.com; anbird@fedex.com;

marshall.sinick@squiresanders.com; matwood@cozen.com; kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com;

agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com; anita.mosner@hklaw.com; mlbenge@zsrlaw.com; urskr@state.gov;

robert.finamore@dot.gov john.allen@faa.gov
#### § 708.1 Record retention period.

For the purposes of the programs in this chapter, no receipt, invoice, or other record required to be retained by any agricultural producer as evidence tending to show performance of a practice under any such program needs to be retained by such producer more than two years following the close of the program year of the program.

[25 FR 105, Jan. 7, 1960. Redesignated at 26 FR 5788, June 29, 1961]
----

**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | the                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q                  of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the“Report”)                  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                  of the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                  and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                  information contained in the                  Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial                  condition                  and results of operations of the                  Company. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                  May 14, 2007 | /s/                  WILLIAM J. GERVAIS      |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                         |
|                                 |                                         |
|                                 | William                  J. Gervais          |
|                                 | Principal                  Executive Officer |

----
#### John Jensen, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Jill Jensen, an Infant, et al., Respondents, v. Shady Pines, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Sam Gross, Individually and Doing Business as Gross Construction Company, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant Gross from an order of the

Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 16, 1968, which denied his motion for a pretrial examination of plaintiffs. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The examination shall proceed at a time and place to be specified in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be served by appellant. The notice of appeal is hereby amended to show that the appeal is from said order, instead of from the decision on which it was based (CPLR 5520, subd. [e]). In our opinion, Special Term erred in defying the motion. Appellant has not waived his right to such examinations by virtue of section 675.9 of title 22 of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York (22 NYCRR 675.9) (formerly Rules of the Appellate Division, Second Department, part 7, rule IX), as he served a notice to examine respondents *prior*to the filing of the note of issue. That he did not also move to compel respondents’ appearance within 60 days after service of the note of issue is irrelevant insofar as section 675.9 is concerned. Furthermore, though the infant plaintiff was only six years old at the time of the accident, she is not incompetent to testify as a matter of law. A preliminary examination to determine her competency should be conducted prior to the pretrial proceedings ordered herein. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

MICHAEL ANDERSON 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

PAUL WHALEY II, ET AL. 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 

 2:06-CV-620-WKW-CSC 

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH COURT’S ORDER AND

MOTION TO PARTIALLY RECONSIDER

 COMES NOW the defendants, through undersigned counsel, and herby give the 

court notice of their compliance with the Court’s September 7, 2006 order partially 

granting plaintiff’s motion for discovery and/or for the production of documents ordering 

that a complete copy of the plaintiff’s presentence report and copies of Administrative 

Regulations 302, 402, 425, 432 and 440 be produced. A copy of the complete 

presentence report and Regulations 302, 425, 432, and 440 are attached hereto 

collectively as Exhibit One. The Defendants would respectfully move that the Court 

reconsider its Order to produce Regulation 402 on the following grounds: 

 1. Regulation 402 deals with procedures and methods to insure the physical 

security, custody and control of inmates not their classification, and is restricted from 

access by inmates and the public in general. 

 2. Production of Regulation 402 could potentially jeopardize the security and 

control of the State’s prisons. 

Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 15 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 3
 3. Plaintiff claims that he was denied a lower security placement 

classification due to racist motives of the defendants and the utilization of false and 

erroneous information. Regulation 402 does not govern security classifications and is 

irrelevant to plaintiff’s claims. 

 WHEREFORE, premises considered, Defendants respectfully requests that the 

Court reconsider its order and deny the request to produce Regulation 402 to the inmate 

plaintiff. In the alternative, the Defendants would request that the court perform an in 

camera inspection of Regulation 402 to determine whether the regulation should be 

produced. 

 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 TROY KING (KIN047) 

 Attorney General 

 s/ Benjamin H. Albritton 

 Benjamin H. Albritton (ALB008) 

 Assistant Attorney General 

 ADDRESS OF COUNSEL: 

Office of the Attorney General 

11 South Union Street 

Montgomery, AL 36130 

(334) 242-7300 

Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 15 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have, this the 21st day of September, 2006, served a copy of 

the foregoing upon the Plaintiff by placing same in the United States Mail, postage 

prepaid and properly addressed as follows: 

Michael Anderson, AIS #156270 

Bullock Correctional Facility 

P.O. Box 5107 

Union Springs, Alabama 36089 

 /s/ Benjamin H. Albritton

 Benjamin H. Albritton 

Assistant Attorney General 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 15 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 51.1913 Serious damage. *Serious damage* means any defect which seriously affects the appearance, or edible, shipping, or keeping quality of the tomatoes. Any one of the following defects or any combination thereof, the seriousness of which exceeds the maximum allowed for any one defect, shall be considered as serious damage: ( a ) Soft ripe tomatoes or tomatoes affected by the soft rot.
( b ) Fresh holes or cuts, or any holes or cuts through the tomato wall, or healed cuts which seriously affect the appearance of the tomato.
( c ) Tomatoes showing any effects of freezing.
( d ) Puffiness which causes the tomato to be distinctly light in weight.
( e ) Growth cracks, when not well healed, or when so extensive, deep or discolored that the appearance of the tomato is seriously affected.
( f ) Scars (except catfaces), when dark colored and shallow and aggregating more than 1 ⁄ 2 inch in diameter on a tomato 21 ⁄ 2 inches in diameter, or lighter colored, shallow scars covering a greater area when they detract from the appearance to a greater extent than a darkcolored, shallow scar 1 ⁄ 2 inch in diameter. Smaller tomatoes shall have lesser areas of scars and larger tomatoes may have greater areas: *Provided,* That such scars do not affect the appearance of the tomatoes to a greater extent than that caused by scars which are permitted on a 21 ⁄ 2-inch tomato.
( g ) Dry rot such as dry type Macrosporium or Phoma, when the spot is not adjacent to the stem scar, or when adjacent to the stem scar and more than 1 ⁄ 4 inch in diameter.
( h ) Fruit actually infested with worms.
52.225-17 Evaluation of Foreign Currency Offers.       As prescribed in 25.1103(c)(, insert the following provision:          Evaluation of Foreign Currency Offers (Feb 2000)          If the Government receives offers in more than one currency, the Government will evaluate offers by converting the foreign currency to United States currency using [*Contracting Officer to insert source of rate*] in effect as follows:                                       (a) For acquisitions conducted using sealed bidding procedures, on the date of bid opening.                                          (b) For acquisitions conducted using negotiation procedures-                                                         (1) On the date specified for receipt of offers, if award is based on initial offers; otherwise                                                            (2) On the date specified for receipt of proposal revisions.                                                                    (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.225 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 35.1**

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE** 

            I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify toWaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2006 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer, LaSalle Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee,  the following with respect to Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2006-9 Trust for the 2006 fiscal year  (the “RelevantYear”):

1.                 A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year. 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

                                                                                                     /s/ H. John Berens

| ___________________________________________Name:  H. John BerensTitle:    Senior Vice President |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 10.26
 NuPathe Inc.
 Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy
 This policy sets forth the compensation for non-employee members of the Board of Directors of
NuPathe Inc. from and after March 3, 2011. The Board of Directors may change this policy at any
time.
 Paid orCompensation Element
    
    Amount
    
    Granted1Board of Directors: Director Retainer
    
    $35,000 per year
    
    Quarterly2 Chairman Retainer
    
    $35,000 per year (additional)
    
    Quarterly2 Annual Option Grant
    
    6,750 options
    
    Annually3 New Director Option Grant
    
    13,500 options
    
    At sign-on4Audit Committee: Chair Retainer
    
    $15,000 per year
    
    Quarterly2 Member Retainer
    
    $7,500 per year
    
    Quarterly2Compensation Committee: Chair Retainer
    
    $10,000 per year
    
    Quarterly2 Member Retainer
    
    $5,000 per year
    
    Quarterly2Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee: Chair Retainer
    
    $5,000 per year
    
    Quarterly2 Member Retainer
    
    $3,500 per year
    
    Quarterly2Expenses: Reimbursed
    
    Per NuPathe Travel Policy
    
    As submitted
 1
    
    All options granted to non-employee directors shall have an exercise price equal to
the closing price per share as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market on the date of grant and a
term of 10 years. Upon a termination of service, unvested options expire and vested options
remain exercisable for one year.
 2
    
    Quarterly cash payments are disbursed at the beginning of each calendar quarter for
service during the prior quarter. Prior to the beginning of each calendar year, directors may
submit an election to receive stock options in lieu of quarterly cash payments during the
year, in an amount based on the Black-Scholes valuation. Options in lieu of cash compensation
are fully vested on the date of grant.
 3
    
    Annual Option Grants are made on the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to all
non-employee directors in office after the Annual Meeting. Annual Option Grants vest in full
on the earlier of the day before the following years Annual Meeting, and the one year
anniversary of the grant date, but vest in full earlier upon a change of control of NuPathe or
the death or total disability of the director.
 4
    
    New Director Option Grants are made on the date that a new non-employee director joins
the Board. New Director Option Grants vest one-third per year beginning on the one year
anniversary of the grant date, but vest in full earlier upon a change of control of NuPathe or
the death or total disability of the director.
§ 765.151 Handling payments. ( a ) *Borrower payments.* Borrowers must submit their loan payments in a form acceptable to the Agency, such as checks and money orders. Forms of payment not acceptable to the Agency include, but are not limited to, cash, foreign currency, foreign checks, and sight drafts.
( b ) *Crediting account.* The Agency credits the borrower's account as of the date the Agency receives payment.
[72 FR 63309, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 87 FR 13124, Mar. 9, 2022]
#### § 75.26 When appeal inspection may be requested.

A request for an appeal inspection may be made by any interested party regarding the results of an inspection as stated on an inspection certificate. Such request shall be made within thirty (30) days following the day on which an inspection certificate was issued.
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 1 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 2 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 3 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 4 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 5 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 6 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 7 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 8 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 9 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 10 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 11 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 12 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 13 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 14 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 15 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 16 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 17 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 18 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 19 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 20 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 21 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 22 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 23 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 24 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 25 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 26 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 27 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 28 of 29
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 33-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 29 of 29
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TL GOODSON LLC

VS CASE NO. 3:21-cv-00178-MCR-EMT

SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE

COMPANY and AUTO-OWNERS

INSURANCE COMPANY

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to and at the direction of the Court, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action be DISMISSED with prejudice as 

to Defendant, SOUTHERN-OWNERS.

 March 14, 2022

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT

/s/ `ÉÇ|vt UÜÉâáátÜw

DATE Deputy Clerk: Monica Broussard

Case 3:21-cv-00178-MCR-EMT Document 13 Filed 03/14/22 Page 1 of 1