alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2862 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Imidacloprid Technical (Imidacloprid). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Imidacloprid Technical 

(Imidacloprid). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMIDACLOPRID TECHNICAL (IMIDACLOPRID). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.32 1-[(6-Chloro-3- 

pyrdinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2- 

imidazolidinimine 

(Imidacloprid) (CAS No. 

138261–41–3) (provided for 

in subheading 2933.39.27) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2862 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties VII Limited Partnership 1997 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000758009
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES VII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             901
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       63
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          20,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,497)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         11,202
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,733
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,828
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,744
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        84
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.80<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

KEITH LAWSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-641-WKW

)

CITY OF ALEXANDER CITY, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

The plaintiff has notified the court that this case has settled. All remaining dates and

deadlines, including the pretrial and the trial date, are CANCELLED. The parties are ORDERED

to file a joint stipulation of dismissal on or before September 5, 2007.

DONE this 22nd day of August, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00641-WKW-TFM Document 18 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 286 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 286

    To amend section 401(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
            regarding the Federal Pell Grant maximum amount.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2005

  Mr. Dodd (for himself, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Jeffords, Mrs. Murray, Mr. 
   Lieberman, Mr. Sarbanes, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Dayton, Mr. Levin, Mr. 
    Lautenberg, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Corzine, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. Akaka) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend section 401(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
            regarding the Federal Pell Grant maximum amount.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL PELL GRANT MAXIMUM AMOUNT.

    Section 401(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1070a(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C);
            (2) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the amount of 
        the Federal Pell Grant for a student eligible under this part 
        shall be--
                    ``(i) $7,600 for academic year 2005-2006;
                    ``(ii) $8,600 for academic year 2006-2007;
                    ``(iii) $9,600 for academic year 2007-2008;
                    ``(iv) $10,600 for academic year 2008-2009; and
                    ``(v) $11,600 for academic year 2009-2010,
        less an amount equal to the amount determined to be the 
        expected family contribution with respect to that student for 
        that year.''; and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) (as amended by 
        paragraph (2)) the following:
            ``(B) If the Secretary determines that the increase from 
        one academic year to the next in the amount of the maximum 
        Federal Pell Grant authorized under subparagraph (A) does not 
        increase students' purchasing power (relative to the cost of 
        attendance at an institution of higher education) by not less 
        than 5 percentage points, then the amount of the maximum 
        Federal Pell Grant authorized under subparagraph (A) for the 
        academic year for which the determination is made shall be 
        increased by an amount sufficient to achieve such a 5 
        percentage point increase.''.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 5:02cr32-RH/WCS

5:04cv140-RH/WCS

CLAY V. TURNER,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING §2255 MOTION

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 99) and the objections thereto (document 101). Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the opinion

of the court. The clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Defendant’s motion, as

amended, for relief under 28 U.S.C. §2255 (document 84) is DENIED WITH

PREJUDICE.” The clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED this 3d day of February, 2006.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 5:02-cr-00032-RH-WCS Document 102 Filed 02/06/06 Page 1 of 1
160 So.2d 225

#### CLAYTON MARK & COMPANY v. Richard H. WALLER.

No. 47061.

Feb. 7, 1964.

In re: Clayton Mark & Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 158 So.2d 224.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
# 31.108 Contracts with nonprofit organizations.

Subpart 31.7 provides principles and standards for determining costs applicable to contracts with nonprofit organizations other than educational institutions (see subpart  31.3), State and local governments (see subpart  31.6), and those nonprofit organizations exempted under the OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200, appendix VIII (see subpart  31.2 for the cost principles applicable to nonprofit organizations exempt from the cost principles in the OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200).

**Parent topic:**Subpart 31.1 - Applicability
|   | (1) | The      Report, containing the financial statements, fully complies with the      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      MMPI. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            | Meruelo Maddux Properties,      Inc. |                         |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                            |                                 |                         |   |
| Date:       April 30, 2009 | By:                                  | /s/ Andrew      Murray  |   |
|                            |                                 | Andrew      Murray           |   |
|                            |                                 | Chief      Financial Officer |   |
|                            |                                 |                         |   |
Page
      29





**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Statement
      of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.** § **1350**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      the undersigned, as the chief financial officer of the Company, certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:





1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















/s/
                R. Alan MillerR.
                Alan MillerChief
                Financial OfficerNovember
                10, 2006
52.247-26 Government Direction and

Marking.

As prescribed in 47.207-8(a)(3), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for

transportation or for transportation-related services when office relocations are involved:

Government Direction and Marking (Apr 1984)

The agency being relocated shall tag or mark property, showing floor, room number, and location

where property is to be placed in the new building. The agency shall provide sufficient personnel to

direct the Contractor’s personnel in the placement of the property at destination.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
#### § 70.60 Report of grading work.

Reports of grading work performed within official plants shall be forwarded to the Administrator by the grader in a manner as may be specified by the Administrator.

[71 FR 42014, July 24, 2006]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

PAUL JONATHAN ENDSLEY,

Petitioner,

vs.

CASE NO. 5:04cv16-LAC/WCS

JAMES CROSBY,

Respondent.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated October 3, 2005. The parties have been furnished a copy of

the report and recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made a de novo

determination of any portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Case 5:04-cv-00016-LC-WCS Document 20 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:04cv16-LAC

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Paul Jonathan Endsley

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his convictions for driving while under the

influence (DUI) manslaughter and DUI with serious bodily injury in the Circuit Court of

the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Bay County, Florida, case number 98-2383H,

is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of October, 2005.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY COLLIER 

Senior United States District Judge

 

Case 5:04-cv-00016-LC-WCS Document 20 Filed 10/19/05 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2010)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 75855-75863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30828]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 75855]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2011-04 of October 25, 
                2010

                
Presidential Determination With Respect To 
                Section 404(c) of the Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 
                2008

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, pursuant to section 404(c) of the Child 
                Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008 (CSPA), title IV of the 
                William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection 
                Reauthorization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110 457), I 
                hereby determine that it is in the national interest of 
                the United States to waive the application to Chad, the 
                Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sudan, and Yemen of 
                the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA.

                You are authorized and directed to submit this 
                determination to the Congress, along with the 
                accompanying memorandum of justification, and to 
                publish it in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, October 25, 2010

Billing code 4710-10-P



[[Page 75856]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TD07DE10.039


[[Page 75857]]




[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TD07DE10.040


[[Page 75858]]




[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TD07DE10.041


[[Page 75859]]




[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TD07DE10.042


[[Page 75860]]




[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TD07DE10.043


[[Page 75861]]




[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TD07DE10.044


[[Page 75862]]




[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TD07DE10.045


[[Page 75863]]


[FR Doc. 2010-30828 Filed 12-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-C



[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TD07DE10.046
§ 636.6 Establishing priority for enrollment in WHIP. ( a ) NRCS, in consultation with Federal and State agencies, tribal, and conservation partners, may identify priorities for enrollment in WHIP that will complement the goals and objectives of relevant fish and wildlife conservation initiatives at the State, regional, tribal land, or national levels. In response to national, tribal, regional, or State fish and wildlife habitat concerns, the Chief may focus program implementation in any given year to specific geographic areas or to address specific habitat development needs.
( b ) The State Conservationist, with recommendations from the State Technical Committee and Tribal Conservation Advisory Council (for tribal land), may give priority to WHIP projects that will address unique habitats or special geographic areas identified in the State. Subsequent cost-share agreement offers that would complement previous cost-share agreements due to geographic proximity of the lands involved or other relationships may receive priority consideration for participation.
( c ) NRCS will evaluate the applications and make enrollment decisions based on the fish and wildlife habitat need using some or all of the following criteria: ( 1 ) Contribution to resolving an identified habitat concern of national, tribal, regional, or State importance including at-risk species;
( 2 ) Relationship to any established wildlife or conservation priority areas;
( 3 ) Duration of benefits to be obtained from the habitat development practices;
( 4 ) Self-sustaining nature of the habitat development practices;
( 5 ) Availability of other partnership matching funds or reduced funding request by the person applying for participation;
( 6 ) Estimated costs of fish and wildlife habitat development activities;
( 7 ) Other factors determined appropriate by NRCS to meet the objectives of the program; and
( 8 ) Willingness of the applicant to complete all conservation improvements during the first 2 years of the WHIP cost-share agreement.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2918 

To provide access to newspapers for blind or other persons with disabilities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. DODD (for himself and Mr. LOTT) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To provide access to newspapers for blind or other persons 

with disabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Free Newspaper Ac5 cess for Blind and Other Persons with Disabilities Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAM. 

7 (a) PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Librarian of Congress 

9 is authorized, subject to the availability of appro10 priations, to pay telecommunications costs for blind 

11 and other persons with disabilities to have interstate 


bajohnson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
2 

•S 2918 IS

1 free access to electronic editions of periodicals and 

2 newspapers, disseminated in specialized audio and 

3 electronic text formats and available contempora4 neously with their print editions, from a multi-State 

5 nonprofit source described in paragraph (2). 

6 (2) MULTI-STATE NONPROFIT SOURCE.—The 

7 multi-State nonprofit source referred to in para8 graph (1) shall be an entity that obtains content 

9 from publishers for free distribution of 1 or more 

10 periodicals or newspapers to blind and other persons 

11 with disabilities in each State in which eligible per12 sons receive books and other publications supplied 

13 by the Librarian of Congress under the Act entitled 

14 ‘‘An Act to provide books for the adult blind’’, ap15 proved March 3, 1931 (2 U.S.C. 135a). 

16 (b) DEFINITION OF BLIND AND OTHER PERSONS

17 WITH DISABILITIES.—In this section, the term ‘‘blind and 

18 other persons with disabilities’’ means individuals who are 

19 eligible or who may qualify, in accordance with the Act 

20 entitled ‘‘An Act to provide books for the adult blind’’, 

21 approved March 3, 1931 (2 U.S.C. 135a), to receive books 

22 and other publications produced in specialized formats. 

23 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

24 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Li25 brary of Congress to carry out this Act $750,000 for fiscal 


bajohnson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
3 

•S 2918 IS

1 year 2007 and such sums as may be necessary for each 

2 of the fiscal years 2008 through 2011. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
#### § 761.101 Applicability.

This subpart applies to all direct applicants and borrowers, except borrowers with only Non-program loans.
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 1 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 2 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 3 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 4 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 5 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 6 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 7 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 8 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 9 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 10 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 11 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 12 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 13 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 14 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 15 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 16 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 17 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 18 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 19 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 20 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 21 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 22 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 23 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 24 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 25 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 26 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 27 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 28 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 29 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 30 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 31 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 32 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 33 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 34 of 34
§ 760.901 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart establishes the terms and conditions under which the 2005-2007 LIP will be administered under Title IX of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (Pub. L. 110-28) for eligible counties as specified in § 760.902(a).
( b ) Eligible livestock owners and contract growers will be compensated in accordance with § 760.909 for eligible livestock deaths that occurred in eligible counties as a direct result of an eligible disaster event. Drought is not an eligible disaster event except when anthrax, as a related condition that occurs as a result of drought, results in the death of eligible livestock.
#### § 610.1 Purpose.

This subpart sets forth Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) policies and procedures for furnishing technical assistance in conservation operations.

[61 FR 27999, June 4, 1996]