alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
52.222-2 Payment for Overtime Premiums.

As prescribed in 22.103-5(b), insert the following clause:

Payment for Overtime Premiums (July 1990)

(a) The use of overtime is authorized under this contract if the overtime premium does not exceed

*______________ or the overtime premium is paid for work-

(1) Necessary to cope with emergencies such as those resulting from accidents, natural disasters,

breakdowns of production equipment, or occasional production bottlenecks of a sporadic nature;

(2) By indirect-labor employees such as those performing duties in connection with administration,

protection, transportation, maintenance, standby plant protection, operation of utilities, or

accounting;

(3) To perform tests, industrial processes, laboratory procedures, loading or unloading of

transportation conveyances, and operations in flight or afloat that are continuous in nature and

cannot reasonably be interrupted or completed otherwise; or

(4) That will result in lower overall costs to the Government.

(b) Any request for estimated overtime premiums that exceeds the amount specified above shall

include all estimated overtime for contract completion and shall-

(1) Identify the work unit; e.g., department or section in which the requested overtime will be used,

together with present workload, staffing, and other data of the affected unit sufficient to permit the

Contracting Officer to evaluate the necessity for the overtime;

(2) Demonstrate the effect that denial of the request will have on the contract delivery or

performance schedule;

(3) Identify the extent to which approval of overtime would affect the performance or payments in

connection with other Government contracts, together with identification of each affected contract;

and

(4) Provide reasons why the required work cannot be performed by using multishift operations or by

employing additional personnel.

* Insert either "zero" or the dollar amount agreed to during negotiations. The inserted figure does

not apply to the exceptions in paragraph (a)(1) through (a)(4) of the clause.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
November 5, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JEANNE RANSOM , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00987

- CV V.

JEANINE EATON, D.D.S

. , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee , Jeanine Eaton, D.D.S., signed September 19, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Jeanne Ransom, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
|   | **Exhibit 32.1** |
|--------|------------------|

 

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Quintana Gold Resources Corp. (the “company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, **Delbert G. Blewett**, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial            Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the company.

 

/s/ **DELBERTG.BLEWETT**

 

**Delbert G. Blewett**

President and Chief Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer 

 

March 31, 2009

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or            its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
Approx i mate Assembly Time: Motor to Motor D istance: Rotor Type: Prop Diameter: Approx i mate F li ght Time: Battery: Height: Weight: Motor Type: Control Link: Video Link: Video Link Range: Satell ite Navigat ion System: Complet ion Level: Length: Width: No assembly requ i red 15.7 i n (400mm) Quadcopter 10.0 i n (253mm) 30 minutes 11.1V 3S 6300mAh Li-Po 9.50 i n (242mm) 45.9 oz (1.3 kg) 4 x 780Kv Brushless Outrunner 2.4GHz, 2.4GHz 5.8GHz 1,970 

### ft (600m) GPS, GLONASS Ready-to-Fly 12.8 i n (325mm) [ 12.8 i n (325mm)
52.224 [Reserved]

52.224-1 Privacy Act Notification.

52.224-2 Privacy Act.

52.224-3 Privacy Training.

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.28


PHILANTHROPY AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) between Chemical Financial Corporation (“Chemical” ) and Gary Torgow (the “Executive”) is entered into as of February 27, 2018.
WHEREAS, Executive currently serves as Executive Chairman of Chemical’s Board of Directors (the “Board”); and
WHEREAS, Chemical recognizes Executive’s long and distinguished history of strong philanthropy to the community that Chemical serves; and
WHEREAS, in the event Executive’s services as Executive Chairman of the Board are terminated and Executive receives a cash severance benefit in connection with his separation from service, Chemical desires to make the charitable contribution described below in recognition of Executive’s extraordinary philanthropy to the community;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, Chemical agrees as follows:
If, Executive’s services to Chemical as Chairman of the Board are terminated Without Cause or for Good Reason, both as defined in the employment agreement between Executive and Chemical in effect at such time (the “Employment Agreement”), Chemical, in recognition of Executive’s voluntary generosity shown to the community over a long period of time, shall donate to the Community Foundation of Southeastern Michigan a cash, lump sum payment within sixty (60) calendar days following Executive’s separation from service with Chemical (the “Donation)”.  The amount of such Donation shall equal the lesser of:  (i) the total amount of any cash Severance Pay (as defined in the Employment Agreement) that Executive is entitled to receive under the Employment Agreement, and (ii) the dollar amount of his Severance Pay that Executive directs to be paid to the Community Foundation of Southeastern Michigan.  Chemical and Executive agree that the Donation is not compensation to Executive for any services that Executive has provided to Chemical, is not due and would not otherwise have been paid to or at the direction of Executive, and Executive shall receive no economic benefit whatsoever as a result of the Donation.
This Agreement shall be binding upon any successor to Chemical.  The Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement.  Facsimile or PDF reproductions of original signatures shall be deemed binding for the purpose of the execution of this Agreement.  No amendment of any provision of this Agreement shall be valid unless the amendment is in writing and signed by Chemical and Executive.
This Agreement is hereby executed as of the date set forth above.
	
			
	 
	 
	CHEMICAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION

	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ Thomas C. Shafer

	 
	 
	Thomas C. Shafer

	 
	Its:
	Vice Chairman of Chemical Financial Corporation

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	/s/ Gary Torgow

	 
	 
	Gary Torgow, Executive
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE SKANSKA USA CIVIL 

SOUTHEAST INC AND SKANSKA 

USA INC, AS OWNERS OF THE 

BARGE KS 5531 PRAYING FOR 

EXONERATION FROM OR FOR 

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 

CASE NO. 3:20-cv-5980-RV/MJF 

REFERRAL AND ORDER 

Referred to Judge Vinson on 2/8/2021 

Type of Motion/Pleading Motion to Consolidate Cases 

Filed by: Plaintiff on 2/5/2021 Doc. No. 8 

X Stipulated/Consented/Joint Pleading/Unopposed

Response: on Doc. No. 

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS 

CLERK OF COURT 

/s/ Jeremy Wright 

 Deputy Clerk 

 

ORDER

 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 15th day of February, 

2021, that: 

(a) The requested relief is GRANTED, as the motion is consented/unopposed and 

the cases appear to involve narrow legal issues common to all. 

(b) The following cases shall be consolidated into this first-filed case for purposes 

of discovery and pretrial legal rulings: 

3:20-cv-05981-RV-EMT 

3:20-cv-05982-RV-HTC 

3:20-cv-05983-RV-MJF 

3:20-cv-05984-RV-HTC 

Case 3:21-cv-00044-RV-EMT Document 6 Filed 02/15/21 Page 1 of 2
3:21-cv-00044-RV-EMT 

3:21-cv-00045-RV-EMT 

3:21-cv-00047-RV-EMT 

3:21-cv-00048-RV-EMT 

3:21-cv-00050-RV-EMT 

3:21-cv-00051-RV-HTC 

3:21-cv-00052-RV-EMT 

3:21-cv-00053-RV-EMT 

3:21-cv-00054-RV-EMT 

3:21-cv-00055-RV-HTC 

3:21-cv-00056-RV-EMT 

3:21-cv-00057-RV-MJF 

3:21-cv-00058-RV-HTC 

3:21-cv-00060-RV-HTC 

3:21-cv-00061-RV-MJF 

3:21-cv-00062-RV-HTC 

3:21-cv-00063-RV-HTC 

 /s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:21-cv-00044-RV-EMT Document 6 Filed 02/15/21 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of S. Herbert Feinberg, Feinberg Bros., Petitioner, v. Department of State of the State of New York, Respondent.

Determination of respondent, dated May 6, 1968, as amended May 13, 1968, finding petitioner guilty of untrustworthiness and incompetency and suspending Ms license for a period of one month, or, in lieu thereof, fining him $250, unanimously annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the charges dismissed. *633While some criticism might be expressed at the failure of the parties to have reduced to writing the alleged' understanding that the expenses for securing the mortgage in question were to be assumed by the purchaser, the failure to do so did not warrant determination by the respondent that petitioner was untrustworthy and incompetent. The present record does not contain the requisite “factual presentation concerning acts or conduct by the licensee * * * as would warrant a conclusion of unreliability, and which establishes that any confidence or reasonable expectation of fair dealing to the general public would be misplaced”. *(Matter of Chiaino*v. *Lomenzo,*26 A D 2d 469, 472.) The proof in the record is “insufficient and insubstantial”. *(Ibid.*473.) Concur—Eager, J. F., Capozzoli, Nunez, McNally and Steuer, JJ.
162 So.2d 573

#### Ellis OLMSTEAD v. R. B. BENNETT, Acting Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 47229.

April 17, 1964.

• 'In re: Ellis Olmstead applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. This Court is without appellate jurisdiction of-habeas corpus proceedings in criminal matters. State ex rel. McIsaac v. Sigler, 236 La. 773, 109 So.2d 89 and cases there cited. Nevertheless, since applicant appears in propria persona and is proceeding in forma pauperis, we have given consideration to the application as though it -was one for remedial writs and find no merit in the complaint. The return of the trial judge and the answer of the State, together with certified copies, of the extracts from the minutes of the proceedings before the Fifteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Vermilion show that applicant was lawfully sentenced for simple burglary on his plea of guilty and, on the trial below, he did not sustain •his claim that he was denied the benefit of counsel.
# 43.107 Contract clause.

The *contracting officer**may* insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 52.243-7, Notification of Changes, in *solicitations* and contracts. The clause is available for use primarily in negotiated research and development or supply contracts for the *acquisition* of major weapon systems or principal subsystems. If the contract amount is expected to be less than $1,000,000, the clause *shall* not be used, unless the *contracting officer* anticipates that situations will arise that *may* result in a contractor alleging that the Government has effected changes other than those identified as such *in writing* and signed by the *contracting officer*.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 43.1 - General
EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID



### 6041 Spurlock 4

1 3/18/2010 7:20 3/18/2010 2 3/18/2010 11:02 3/18/2010 3 3/18/2010 14:37 3/18/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used



### 10:42 411 Dry Method 26A 

### 14:19 329 Dry Method 26A 

### 17:50 423 Dry Method 26A Test End Time Chlorine Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments 

### 2033.05 2625.47 11.10 2029.00 2617.84 11.10 2027.50 2616.72 11.10 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)

### (SCFH)

Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure 

### 12.91 4.40 

### 36577916.90 245.35 245.08 bituminous klb/hr 12.89 4.44 36528125.50 244.69 244.94 bituminous klb/hr 12.88 4.45 36512572.86 244.97 245.06 bituminous klb/hr Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Fuel #2 Fuel #3Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Other Supporting Information Fuel #4
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

Cedric Cassare Patton, Petitioner, 

v. 

State of South Carolina, Respondent. 

Appellate Case No. 2013-001029 

Appeal From Greenville County 

The Honorable G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court 

Judge
 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2014-MO-032 

Submitted July 10, 2014 – Filed July 30, 2014 

APPEAL DISMISSED 

Wanda H. Carter, Esquire, of Columbia, for Petitioner. 

Karen Christine Ratigan, Esquire, of Columbia, 

Respondent. 

PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the denial of his 

application for post-conviction relief (PCR). 
Because there is sufficient evidence to support the PCR judge's finding that 

petitioner did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a direct appeal, we 

grant certiorari on petitioner's Question I and proceed with a review of the direct 

appeal issue pursuant to Davis v. State, 288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986). 

Counsel for petitioner has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 

738 (1967) and a petition to be relieved as counsel. Petitioner has not filed a pro se 

response. After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders we dismiss the 

appeal and grant the petition to be relieved as counsel. 

DISMISSED. 

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., 

concur.
#### GOLDSTEIN v. SCHWARTZ.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 18, 1914.)

Assignments (§ 136*)—Proof of Execution.

In an action by an assignee for goods sold, it was error to admit in evidence the assignment, without any proof of its execution and delivery.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Assignments, Cent. Dig. § 233 : Dec. Dig. § 136.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Action by Victor Goldstein against Morris Schwartz. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Reversed, and new trial granted.

Argued June term, 1914, before SEABURY, BIJUR, and PAGE, JJ.

Bernard Chambers, of New York City, for appellant.

Abraham L. Levy, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

This action is to recover the agreed price of certain stoves alleged to have been sold by plaintiff’s assignor to defendant. Over defendant’s objection the assignment was put in evidence, without any proof of its execution or delivery.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
#### § 51.1358 Serious damage.

*Serious damage* means any injury or defect which cannot be removed during the usual commercial preparation for use without a loss of over 20 percent, by weight, of the pear in excess of that which would occur if the pear were not defective.
47.305-11 Options in shipment and delivery.       Although the clauses prescribed in subpart  43.2 allow certain changes to be made in regard to shipment and delivery, it may be desirable to provide specifically for certain options in the solicitation. The Government may reserve the right to-                                       (a) 						            Direct deliveries of all or part of the contract quantity to destinations or to consignees other than those specified in the solicitation and in the contract;                                          (b) 						            Direct shipments in quantities that may require transportation rates different from those on which the contract price is based; and                                          (c) 						            Direct shipments by a mode of transportation other than that stipulated in the solicitation and in the contract.    **Parent topic:** 47.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
T 

nGOADiycMT OF 

;T,K£T OPERATlONo 

Economic Development Council ^^^ ,30 u A ^ 2U 

August 18, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 7th Street, S.W., Washington D.C. 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

This letter is sent to convey my support for the County of San Diego Airports application and 

proposal for a Small Community Air Service Development Program Grant for marketing to 

attract new air service to McClellan-Palomar Airport in the City of Carlsbad. Despite the fact 

that our community is among the fastest growing in the country, we are limited by the lack of 

local airline service in San Diego's North County. The increasingly difficult automobile traffic 

situation in San Diego County makes it impractical for North County businesses to access air 

service at San Diego International Airport. Many businesses fear this lack of access to air 

transportation system will limit our region's future growth. 

McClellan-Palomar Airport was recently revitalized with a $30 million investment in a new 

commercial air terminal building, additional taxiways, larger aircraft parking ramps, a customs 

facility, new automobile parking lots, and other airport improvements. In addition, a $10 million 

runway reconstruction project was completed last month. These improvements provide 

expanded capacity for the airport to accommodate the demand in the region for new air carriers. 

On behalf of the San Diego North County Economic Development Council, I would sincerely 

appreciate your consideration and support of the grant application being submitted by County of 

San Diego Airports. 

Sincerely, 

Qci4y Knigh t 

Gary Knight, President 

San Diego North Economic Development Council 

100 N Rancho Santa Fe Road, Suite 124 Escondido, CA 92069 760-598-9311 Fax 760-598-9325
#### In the Matter of the Application of Robert Steven Gelman for Admission to the Bar.

Application for admission to the Bar denied, on the ground that applicant has failed to comply with the requirements as to residence in New York (CPLR 9406; Rules of the Court of Appeals for Admission of Attorneys and Counselors-at-Law, rule II 22 NYCRR Part 521), without prejudice to renewal upon proof of compliance with the applicable rules. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN IN RE SKANSKA USA

CIVIL SOUTHEAST INC. AND

SKANSKA USA, INC., AS

OWNERS OF THE BARGE KS ADMIRALTY RULE 9(H)

5531 PRAYING FOR

EXONERATION FROM OR Case No.: 3:20cv5980/LAC/HTC

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 

___________________________________/

O R D E R

It is now ORDERED:

1. The Motion for Continuance (Doc. 1279) filed by Skanska USA Civil

Southeast Inc. and Skanska USA, Inc., is GRANTED to the extent that the

commencement of trial in this case is hereby POSTPONED to a date to be later

determined. 

2. In light of the continuance of trial, the pretrial hearing scheduled for

Thursday, September 2, 2021, is also POSTPONED to a date to be later

determined. 

ORDERED on this 1st day of September, 2021.

 s/L.A. Collier 

 Lacey A. Collier

 Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1282 Filed 09/01/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Shlomo  Friedman,  the  President,   Chief  Executive  Officer,   Treasurer  and
Secretary, and Director of PowerRaise,  Inc. (the "Company"),  certifies,  under
the  standards  set forth and  solely for the  purposes  of 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge,  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the  Company  for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2007,  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and  information  contained in
that  Form  10-K  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the  financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: April 8, 2008          POWERRAISE, INC.


                             By: /s/ Shlomo Friedman
                                ------------------------------------------------
                             Name: Shlomo Friedman
                             Title: President, Treasurer, Secretary and Director
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.