alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2690 Introduced in Senate (IS)]















109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2690

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 8801 Sudley Road in Manassas, Virginia, as the ``Harry J. Parrish 
                             Post Office''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2006

 Mr. Allen (for himself and Mr. Warner) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 8801 Sudley Road in Manassas, Virginia, as the ``Harry J. Parrish 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HARRY J. PARRISH POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8801 Sudley Road, Manassas, Virginia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Harry J. Parrish Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Harry J. 
Parrish Post Office.`
**EXHIBIT 31.1** **Section 302    Certification of Principal Executive Officer**     I, William J. Gervais, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of Qualstar Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) [Paragraph (b) is omitted pursuant to SEC    Release Nos.    33-8238 and    34-47986]     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: May 12, 2006/s/  WILLIAM    J. GERVAIS    William J. Gervais    Chief Executive Officer
52.216-18 Ordering.       As prescribed in 16.506(a), insert the following clause:          Ordering (Aug 2020)                                       (a) 						            Any supplies and services to be furnished under this contract shall be ordered by issuance of delivery orders or task orders by the individuals or activities designated in the Schedule. Such orders may be issued from __________ through ____________ [*insert dates*].                                          (b) 						            All delivery orders or task orders are subject to the terms and conditions of this contract. In the event of conflict between a delivery order or task order and this contract, the contract shall control.                                          (c) 						            A delivery order or task order is considered "issued" when—                                                         (1) 								                If sent by mail (includes transmittal by U.S. mail or private delivery service), the Government deposits the order in the mail;                                                            (2) 								                If sent by fax, the Government transmits the order to the Contractor's fax number; or                                                            (3) 								                If sent electronically, the Government either—                                                                           (i) 										                    Posts a copy of the delivery order or task order to a Government document access system, and notice is sent to the Contractor; or                                                                              (ii) 										                    Distributes the delivery order or task order via email to the Contractor's email address.                                                                                                                            (d) 						            Orders may be issued by methods other than those enumerated in this clause only if authorized in the contract.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.216 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of The American Committee for the Weizmann Institute of Science, Appellant, v Jennifer Dunn, Individually and as Executor of Doris Weingarten, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

Submitted July 30, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 36 AD3d 419.

Motion by Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General of the State of New York, for an order permitting movant to file a brief and to participate in oral argument of the appeal, granted in each respect.
Exhibit
32.1
  
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Phoenix Energy Resource,
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Rene Ronald Soullier,
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify
that:
  * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  * the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 PHOENIX ENERGY RESOURCE, INC.
                (Registrant)Date: November
      6, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Rene Ronald
      SoullierRene
      Ronald Soullier
                Chief
      Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
  Officer
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-CR-169-WKW

)

DEMETRIA MILLS )

MOTION TO DECREASE DEFENDANT’S OFFENSE LEVEL

PURSUANT TO § 3E1.1(b), UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES

(ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY)

COMES NOW the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary,

United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and files the above-captioned

Motion, and as reasons therefore, submits the following:

1. Defendant qualifies for a reduction in Defendant’s sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G

§ 3E1.1(b) as Defendant assisted authorities in the investigation and prosecution of

Defendant’s own misconduct by timely notifying authorities of Defendant’s intention to

enter a plea of guilty, thereby permitting the United States to avoid preparing for trial and

permitting the Government and this Court to allocate their resources efficiently.

2. Accordingly, pursuant to U.S.S.G § 3E1.1(b), the United States respectfully

moves this Court to reduce the Defendant’s offense level by one level. Combined with the

two-level reduction applied to Defendant’s offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a),

a total reduction of three levels should be applied to Defendant’s offense level for

Defendant’s acceptance of responsibility.

Respectfully submitted this the 29 day of January, 2008. th

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 535 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 1 of 3
Assistant United States Attorney

131 Clayton Street

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 535 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 2 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-CR-169-WKW

)

DEMETRIA MILLS )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 29, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such

filing to the following: Everett Urech.

Respectfully submitted,

s/A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney 

131 Clayton Street 

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 535 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6898

LEARIE A. DALY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ST. MARY’S COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; ST. MARY’S COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; TIMOTHY K. CAMERON, Lieutenant Commander; DEBORAH L. DIEDRICH, Lieutenant Assistant; MANAGER, ARAMARK FOOD CATERING SERVICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03- 2352-AMD) Submitted: August 11, 2004 Decided: September 16, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Learie A. Daly, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Breads, Jr., LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSURANCE TRUST, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Learie A. Daly appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Daly v. St. Mary’s County Sheriff’s Office , No. CA-03-2352-AMD (D. Md. Jan. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
45.606 Contractor scrap procedures.       (a) 						            The property administrator should, in coordination with the plant clearance officer, ensure that contractor scrap disposal processes, methods, and practices allow for effective, efficient, and proper disposition and are properly documented in the contractor’s property management procedures.                                          (b) 						            The property administrator should determine the extent to which separate disposal processing or physical segregation for different scrap types is or may be required. Such scrap may require physical segregation, unique disposal processing, or separate plant clearance reporting. For example, the scope of work may create scrap-                                                         (1) 								                Consisting of sensitive items;                                                            (2) 								                Containing hazardous materials or wastes;                                                            (3) 								                Contaminated with hazardous materials or wastes;                                                            (4) 								                That is classified or otherwise controlled;                                                            (5) 								                Containing precious or strategic metals; or                                                            (6) 								                That is dangerous to public health or safety.                                                                             (c) 						            Absent contract terms and conditions to the contrary, the Government may abandon parts removed and replaced from property as a result of normal maintenance actions or removed from property as a result of the repair, maintenance, overhaul, or modification process.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 45.6 - Reporting, Reutilization, and Disposal
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:02-cr-00034-MP

SHAWN EDWARD SIEFER,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 40, First Motion for Early Termination of

Probation, filed by Shawn Edward Siefer. Mr. Siefer's probation was transferred on June 7,

2005, however, and jurisdiction was accepted by the United States District Court for the District

of Massachusetts on July 13, 2005. (see nunc pro tunc order at doc. 42). Accordingly, the

motion at doc. 40 is denied, and Mr. Siefer is advised to file such motion with the United States

District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of January, 2006

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:02-cr-00034-MP Document 45 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 1
Wachovia
                Securities8739
                Research Drive, URP4Charlotte,
                NC 28288














**1123
        SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE**
 
 
 
 Reference
        is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing
        Agreement dated as of
        October 11, 2005, by and among Structured Asset Securities Corporation, II,
        as
        Depositor, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland
        Loans Services, Inc., as Special Servicer, LaSalle Bank, National Association,
        as Trustee, and ABN AMRO Bank, as Fiscal Agent, with respect to Commercial
        Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005C-7 (the "Agreement").
        Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
        assigned in the Agreement.
 
 Pursuant
        to Section 3.13 of this Agreement, Timothy Ryan, and Marilyn Addison, Managing
        Director of Customer Relationship Management and Director of Compliance Third
        Party Oversight, do hereby certify that:
 
 1.
            A
                review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period
                from
                January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 and of its performance
                under the
                Agreement during such period has been made under our supervision;
                and 
 2.
            To
                the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
                has
                fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
                respects throughout the period January 1, 2006 through December 31,
                2006;
                and 
 3.
            The
                Master Servicer has received no notice regarding the qualification
                or
                challenging the status of any REMIC Pool as a REMIC, or the Grantor
                Trust
                as a grantor trust, from the Internal Revenue Service or any other
                governmental agency or body. IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the
        10 th day of
        March 2007.
 
 /s/
        Timothy S. Ryan       
        /s/ Marilyn Addison
 Timothy
        S. Ryan, Managing Director Marilyn Addison,
        Director
 Wachovia
        Bank National Association  Wachovia Bank National Association
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 17 Filed 03/26/21 Page 1 of 7
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 17 Filed 03/26/21 Page 2 of 7
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 17 Filed 03/26/21 Page 3 of 7
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 17 Filed 03/26/21 Page 4 of 7
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 17 Filed 03/26/21 Page 5 of 7
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 17 Filed 03/26/21 Page 6 of 7
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 17 Filed 03/26/21 Page 7 of 7
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Syntellect Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
V. Carollo, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/  Anthony V. Carollo, Jr.
----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Syntellect Inc.
August 14, 2002
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Linwood Jackson, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 21, 1965, convicting defendant of attempted possession of a narcotic drug as a felony, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a prison term of four to five years, affirmed. Defendant contends that the sentence imposed should have been an indeterminate term of one and one-half years to five years. His interpretation of the statutes applicable fails to recognize that the prescribed minimum term of imprisonment for attempted possession of narcotics is “ *not less than*” half of three years (Penal Law, § 1751, subds. 3, 5; § 261, suhd. 2; § 2189) and that the statutes do not prescribe any outer limit for the minimum term of imprisonment so long as it does not exceed one half of the maximum prescribed for the consummation of the intended crime itself. The phrase “not less than” one and one-half years is not to be read, as defendant contends, as if it were “not more than” one and one-half years (cf. *People ex rel. Warner*v. *Fay,*24 A D 2d 556). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 5:99cr28-SPM

JASON LEON HARDY,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant Jason Leon Hardy’s

motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) and the retroactive crack

cocaine amendment (Amendments 706 and 711).

Upon review, the Court finds that Defendant is not entitled to a sentence

reduction. An application of the amendment results in no change to Defendant’s

sentencing range because of the career offender enhancement, which sets

Defendant’s offense level at 37. With a 3 point reduction for acceptance of

responsibility, Defendant’s total offense level remains at level 34, and his

guideline range remains 262-327 months as originally calculated. Accordingly, it

is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion for reduction of sentence

Case 5:99-cr-00028-MW-MD Document 174 Filed 04/30/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

CASE NO.: 5:99cr28-SPM

(doc. 173) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of April, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 5:99-cr-00028-MW-MD Document 174 Filed 04/30/08 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eye Care centers of America, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 4, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jennifer L. Taylor, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|             |  |                                                     
|------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|May 15, 2009 |  | /s/ Jennifer L. Taylor                              
|             |  | Jennifer L. Taylor                                  
|             |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EYE CARE CENTERS OF
AMERICA, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.