alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 58.709 Cookers.

The cookers shall be the steam jacketed or direct steam type. They shall be constructed of stainless steel or other equally corrosion-resistant material. All product contact surfaces shall be readily accessible for cleaning. Each cooker shall be equipped with an indicating thermometer, and shall be equipped with a temperature recording device. The recording thermometer stem may be placed in the cooker if satisfactory time charts are obtained, if not, the stem shall be placed in the hotwell or filler hopper. Steam check valves on direct steam type cookers shall be mounted flush with cooker wall, be constructed of stainless steel and designed to prevent the backup of product into the steam line, or the steam line shall be constructed of stainless steel pipes and fittings which can be readily cleaned. If direct steam is applied to the product only culinary steam shall be used (see § 58.127(d)).
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76004-76005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30629]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9235-9]


Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) responses to Agency Clearance requests, in compliance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.). An agency may not 
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB 
control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA regulations are listed 
in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Westlund (202) 566-1682, or e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f283a2c2b332a313b712d363c341f3a2f3e71383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ea9d8f999e869f848ec498838981aa8f9a8bc48d859c">[email protected]</span></a> and please refer to the appropriate EPA 
Information Collection Request (ICR) Number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Responses to Agency Clearance Requests

OMB Approvals

    EPA ICR Number 2374.02; Corporate ID Reporting Rule; 40 CFR part 
98; was approved on 11/01/2010; OMB Number 2060-0646; expires on 11/30/
2013; Approved without change.
    EPA ICR Number 1135.10; NSPS for Magnetic Tape Coating Facilities; 
40 CFR part 60, subparts A and SSS; was approved on 11/09/2010; OMB 
Number 2060-0171; expires on 11/30/2013; Approved without change.
    EPA ICR Number 1975.08; NESHAP for Stationary Reciprocating 
Internal Combustion Engines; 40 CFR part 63, subparts A and ZZZZ; was 
approved on 11/12/2010; OMB Number 2060-0548; expires on 11/30/2013; 
Approved without change.

Comment Filed

    EPA ICR Number 2392.01; Fuel Economy Labeling of Motor Vehicles 
(Proposed Rule); in 40 CFR parts 85, 86 and 600; OMB filed comment on 
11/12/2010.
    EPA ICR Number 1684.15; Emissions Certification, Compliance and In-
use Testing Requirements for On-highway Heavy Duty Engines and Vehicles 
Equipped with On-Board Diagnostics (PR for Alt Fuel Conversion of 
Heavy-duty Engines); in 40 CFR part 1042, subparts C, D, G and H; OMB 
filed comment on 11/12/2010.

[[Page 76005]]

    EPA ICR Number 1884.05; Addendum to Partial Update of the TSCA 
Section 8(b) Inventory Data Base, Production and Site Reports; in 40 
CFR parts 710 and 711; OMB filed comment on 11/12/2010.

    Dated: December 1, 2010.
John Moses,
Director, Collections Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-30629 Filed 12-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 52.5 Who may obtain inspection service.

An application for inspection service may be made by any interested party, including, but not limited to, the United States and any instrumentality or agency thereof, any State, county, municipality, or common carrier, and any authorized agent in behalf of the foregoing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1998 and the Statement of Operations for
the Year Ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          38,539
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,539
<PP&E>                                       8,426,634
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,423,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,152,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              301
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,151,872
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,152,173
<SALES>                                        362,778
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               367,745
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               417,237
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,492)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (49,492)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (49,492)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.23)
        

</TABLE>
§ 63.200 NSIIC establishment and purpose. ( a ) There is hereby established a National Sheep Industry Improvement Center. The purpose of the Center shall be to: ( 1 ) Promote strategic development activities and collaborative efforts by private and State entities to maximize the impact of Federal assistance to strengthen and enhance production and marketing of sheep or goat products in the United States;
( 2 ) Optimize the use of available human capital and resources within the sheep or goat industries;
( 3 ) Provide assistance to meet the needs of the sheep or goat industry for infrastructure development, business development, production, resource development, and market and environmental research;
( 4 ) Advance activities that empower and build the capacity of the U.S. sheep or goat industry to design unique responses to the special needs of the sheep or goat industries on both a regional and national basis; and
( 5 ) Adopt flexible and innovative approaches to solving the long-term needs of the United States sheep and goat industry.
( b ) The NSIIC shall submit to the Secretary an annual strategic plan for the delivery of financial assistance provided by the NSIIC. A strategic plan shall identify: ( 1 ) Goals, methods, and a benchmark for measuring the success of carrying out the plan and how the plan relates to the national and regional goals of the NSIIC;
( 2 ) The amount and sources of Federal and non-Federal funds that are available for carrying out the plan;
( 3 ) Funding priorities;
( 4 ) Selection criteria for funding; and
( 5 ) A method of distributing funding.
#### § 58.157 Inspection or grading certificates.

All dairy products which have been processed or manufactured, packaged and inspected or graded in accordance with the provision of this part may be covered by an inspection or grading certificate issued by the inspector or grader.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT (11)

                                 SYNTELLECT INC.
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three Months Ended Sep. 30        Nine Months Ended Sep. 30
                                                             2001              2000            2001            2000
                                                          ---------          -------        ---------         -------
<S>                                                       <C>                <C>            <C>               <C>
Numerator:
     Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss)
         per share - net income (loss)                    $  (2,279)         $   476        $  (6,969)        $ 2,674
                                                          =========          =======        =========         =======

Denominator:
     Denominator for basic income (loss) per
         share - - weighted average number of
         common shares outstanding during the
         period                                              11,294           11,894           11,236          11,845
     Incremental common shares attributable to
         assumed exercise of outstanding
         common stock options                                    --            1,153               --           1,011
                                                          ---------          -------        ---------         -------
Denominator for diluted income (loss) per share              11,294           13,047           11,236          12,856
                                                          =========          =======        =========         =======
Basic net income (loss) per share                         $   (0.20)         $  0.04        $   (0.62)        $  0.23
                                                          =========          =======        =========         =======
Diluted net income (loss) per share                       $   (0.20)         $  0.04        $   (0.62)        $  0.21
                                                          =========          =======        =========         =======
</TABLE>

      The computation of diluted loss per share for the three months ended
September 30, 2001 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 excluded the
effects of shares of common stock issued on the exercise of certain common stock
options in consideration for $141 and $352, respectively, because such shares
would have been anti-dilutive.


                                       24
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ROBERT C. YON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 5:99cv195-SPM

MAYO CORRECTIONAL

INSTITUTION,

Defendant.

_______________________/

ORDER

A letter dated February 18, 2006 by Plaintiff Robert C. Yon was received

by the Clerk of Court and referred to the undersigned judge. Upon review of the

letter it is unclear what, if anything, Plaintiff is requesting. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to file the letter. Plaintiff is advised,

however, that no other action will be taken.

SO ORDERED this 6th day of March, 2006.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 5:99-cv-00195-SPM Document 110 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06cr169-WKW

)

ROGER WALTON )

JAMES TALLEY )

JAMES EARL HUBBARD )

DARRYL BROWN )

WILMONT TIMOTHY BARNETT )

TERRENCE ANTWAN NEWKIRK )

ORDER 

For good cause, it is

ORDERED that the changes of plea for the above named defendants will be taken as follows:

October 17, 2007, before Judge Charles Coody in courtroom 4-B at 3:00 p.m.

Roger Walton

James Talley

James Earl Hubbard

October 22, 2007, before Judge Wallace Capel in courtroom 5-A at 3:00 p.m.

Darryl Brown

Wilmont Timothy Barnett

Terrence Antwan Jerome Newkirk

DONE, this 15th day of October, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 378 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 
 
 *Title:*
                     ANA Consultant and Evaluator Qualifications Form. *OMB No.:*
                     0970-0265. *Description:*
                     The ANA Consultant and Evaluator Qualifications Form is used to collect information from prospective proposal reviewers in compliance with 42 USC Section 2991d-1. The form allows the Commissioner of ANA to select qualified people to review grant applications for Social and Economic Development Strategies (SEDS), Native Language Preservation and Maintenance, and Environmental Regulatory Enhancement. The panel review process is a legislative mandate in the ANA grant funding process. *Respondents:*
                     Native Americans, Native Alaskans, Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders. Annual Burden Estimates
Instrument
Number of 
                             respondents
Number of 
                             responses per respondent
Average burden hours 
                             per response
Total burden hoursANA Consultant and Evaluator Qualifications Form
300
1
1
300
 Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 300 *Additional Information:* Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Administration, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, 
                    *Attn:*
                     ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. E-mail address: 
                    *infocollection@acf.hhs.gov.* *OMB Comment:* OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, *Fax:*
                     202-395-7285. *E-mail: OIRA_SUBMISSION@OMB.EOP.GOV.* *Attn:*
                     Desk Officer for the Administration for Children and Families. Dated: November 22, 2010. Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. 2010-29779 Filed 11-24-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
52.219-16 Liquidated DamagesSubcontracting Plan.

As prescribed in 19.708(b)(2), insert the following clause:

Liquidated Damages-Subcontracting Plan (Sep 2021)

(a) "Failure to make a good faith effort to comply with the subcontracting plan," as used in this

clause, means a willful or intentional failure to perform in accordance with the requirements of the

subcontracting plan approved under the clause in this contract entitled "Small Business

Subcontracting Plan," or willful or intentional action to frustrate the plan.

(b) Performance shall be measured by applying the percentage goals to the total actual

subcontracting dollars or, if a commercial plan is involved, to the pro rata share of actual

subcontracting dollars attributable to Government contracts covered by the commercial plan. If, at

contract completion or, in the case of a commercial plan, at the close of the fiscal year for which the

plan is applicable, the Contractor has failed to meet its subcontracting goals and the Contracting

Officer decides in accordance with paragraph (c) of this clause that the Contractor failed to make a

good faith effort to comply with its subcontracting plan (see 19.705-7), established in accordance

with the clause in this contract entitled "Small Business Subcontracting Plan," the Contractor shall

pay the Government liquidated damages in an amount stated. The amount of probable damages

attributable to the Contractor’s failure to comply shall be an amount equal to the actual dollar

amount by which the Contractor failed to achieve each subcontract goal.

(c) Before the Contracting Officer makes a final decision that the Contractor has failed to make such

good faith effort, the Contracting Officer shall give the Contractor written notice specifying the

failure and permitting the Contractor to demonstrate what good faith efforts have been made and to

discuss the matter. Failure to respond to the notice may be taken as an admission that no valid

explanation exists. If, after consideration of all the pertinent data, the Contracting Officer finds that

the Contractor failed to make a good faith effort to comply with the subcontracting plan, the

Contracting Officer shall issue a final decision to that effect and require that the Contractor pay the

Government liquidated damages as provided in paragraph (b) of this clause.

(d) With respect to commercial plans, the Contracting Officer who approved the plan will perform

the functions of the Contracting Officer under this clause on behalf of all agencies with contracts

covered by the commercial plan.

(e) The Contractor shall have the right of appeal, under the clause in this contract entitled, Disputes,

from any final decision of the Contracting Officer.

(f) Liquidated damages shall be in addition to any other remedies that the Government may have.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.219 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 281 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 281

  For the relief of Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2005

   Mr. Akaka introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  For the relief of Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Vichai Sae 
Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree) shall be held and considered to 
have been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent 
residence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon payment of 
the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Vichai Sae Tung (also 
known as Chai Chaowasaree), as provided in this Act, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by the appropriate 
number during the current fiscal year the total number of immigrant 
visas available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under 
section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
# 47.305-14 Mode of transportation.

Generally, *solicitations**shall* not specify a particular mode of transportation or a particular *carrier*. If the use of particular types of *carriers* is necessary to meet program requirements, the *solicitation**shall* provide that only *offers* involving the specified types of *carriers* will be considered. The *contracting officer**shall* obtain all specifications for mode, route, delivery, etc., from the transportation office.

**Parent topic:**47.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DAVID LEE NICKELSON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20cv259-TKW-MJF

KEITH R. HARRIS,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 2). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, I agree with the magistrate 

judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by 

reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the file.

Case 5:20-cv-00259-TKW-MJF Document 3 Filed 11/02/20 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE and ORDERED this 2nd day of November, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00259-TKW-MJF Document 3 Filed 11/02/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 756.8 Calculating OFF Program payments. ( a ) A revenue loss calculation and factor will determine the OFF Program payment. ( 1 ) A factor will be applied to reduce the participant's payment to ensure that total OFF Program payments are no more than 70 percent of the total revenue losses by all eligible OFF Program participants.
( 2 ) If necessary, at the close of the OFF Program sign-up period, a national payment factor may be determined by the Secretary and announced if full payment of all approved OFF Program applications would result in payments in excess of available OFF Program funds, less a reserve amount of 3 percent. A Price Support Division SP Notice will be issued to announce the issuance of OFF and, if applicable, the factored rate.
( b ) ( 1 ) The OFF Program payment calculation is: (Calendar year 2014 producer certified gross revenue − Calendar year 2015 producer certified gross revenue) + (Calendar year 2014 producer certified gross revenue − Calendar year 2016 producer certified gross revenue) = Total revenue loss for calendar year 2015 and calendar year 2016 × 70% = OFF Program payment (subject to proration after sign-up, see paragraph (a)(2) of this section)
( 2 ) If the producer did not have 2014 revenue, then 2019 revenue will be used, and the calculation will be: (Calendar year 2019 producer certified gross revenue − Calendar year 2015 producer certified gross revenue) + (Calendar year 2019 producer certified gross revenue − Calendar year 2016 producer certified gross revenue) = Total revenue loss for calendar year 2015 and calendar year 2016 × 70% = OFF Program Payment (subject to proration after sign-up, see paragraph (a)(2) of this section)
( c ) If there is no gross revenue loss determined for calendar year 2015 or calendar year 2016, the payment will be zero.