alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 1:20CR29-AW/GRJ

TROY’TAVIOUS SHAQUILLE SCOTT

____________________________________/

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

AD PROSEQUENDUM

The United States of America respectfully shows unto the Court:

1. An Indictment is pending in this Court against Troy’tavious Scott, in the 

above styled case, and first appearance as to said defendant is set for November 3, 

2020 at 4:00 p.m.

2. The defendant is now confined in the custody of the Sheriff, Alachua

County Jail.

3. It is necessary to have said defendant before this Court for first 

appearance as aforesaid.

WHEREFORE, the United States of America PRAYS that this Honorable 

Court issue a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum, directing any United States 

Marshal to proceed to the aforesaid institution and take into custody the body of 

the said defendant and have him before this Court at the time and place above 

specified for said proceedings and upon completion of said proceedings to return 

Case 1:20-cr-00029-AW-GRJ Document 8 Filed 10/29/20 Page 1 of 2
2

the defendant to the custody of the official in charge of the said defendant; and 

also directing the official in charge to deliver the defendant into the custody of any 

United States Marshal or his duly authorized representative for said proceedings.

This 29th day of October, 2020.

Respectfully submitted, 

Lawrence Keefe

United States Attorney

s/ Christopher Elsey

CHRISTOPHER M. ELSEY

Assistant United States Attorney

Florida Bar No. 0062475

Northern District of Florida

401 SE First Ave, Suite 211

Gainesville, FL 32601

Ph. (352) 378-0996

Christopher.Elsey@usdoj.gov

Case 1:20-cr-00029-AW-GRJ Document 8 Filed 10/29/20 Page 2 of 2
# L_2022072EN.01000701.xml

| 7.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 72/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 72/7

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2021/953 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2021 on a framework for the issuance, verification and acceptance of interoperable COVID-19 vaccination, test and recovery certificates (EU Digital COVID Certificate) to facilitate free movement during the COVID-19 pandemic

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 211 of 15 June 2021
  )

On page 20, Article 13, paragraph 2:

for:

‘2.   Either the European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 11(6). In such a case, the Commission shall repeal the act immediately following the notification of the decision to object by the European Parliament or by the Council.’,

read:

‘2.   Either the European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 12(6). In such a case, the Commission shall repeal the act immediately following the notification of the decision to object by the European Parliament or by the Council.’.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6914
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (1:07-cv-00397-NCT) Submitted: December 12, 2007 Decided: December 28, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Julian Edward Rochester seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rochester has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. The motions to proceed in forma pauperis and to compel rulings are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
52.232-17 Interest.

As prescribed in 32.611 (a) and (b), insert the following clause:

Interest (May 2014)

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this contract under a Price Reduction for Defective Certified

Cost or Pricing Data clause or a Cost Accounting Standards clause, all amounts that become payable

by the Contractor to the Government under this contract shall bear simple interest from the date

due until paid unless paid within 30 days of becoming due. The interest rate shall be the interest

rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury as provided in 41 U.S.C. 7109, which is applicable

to the period in which the amount becomes due, as provided in paragraph (e) of this clause, and then

at the rate applicable for each six-month period as fixed by the Secretary until the amount is paid.

(b) The Government may issue a demand for payment to the Contractor upon finding a debt is due

under the contract.

(c) Final Decisions. The Contracting Officer will issue a final decision as required by 33.211 if-

(1) The Contracting Officer and the Contractor are unable to reach agreement on the existence or

amount of a debt in a timely manner;

(2) The Contractor fails to liquidate a debt previously demanded by the Contracting Officer within

the timeline specified in the demand for payment unless the amounts were not repaid because the

Contractor has requested an installment payment agreement; or

(3) The Contractor requests a deferment of collection on a debt previously demanded by the

Contracting Officer (see 32.607-2).

(d) If a demand for payment was previously issued for the debt, the demand for payment included in

the final decision shall identify the same due date as the original demand for payment.

(e) Amounts shall be due at the earliest of the following dates:

(1) The date fixed under this contract.

(2) The date of the first written demand for payment, including any demand for payment resulting

from a default termination.

(f) The interest charge shall be computed for the actual number of calendar days involved beginning

on the due date and ending on-

(1) The date on which the designated office receives payment from the Contractor;

(2) The date of issuance of a Government check to the Contractor from which an amount otherwise

payable has been withheld as a credit against the contract debt; or

(3) The date on which an amount withheld and applied to the contract debt would otherwise have

become payable to the Contractor.

(g) The interest charge made under this clause may be reduced under the procedures prescribed in

32.608-2 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation in effect on the date of this contract.
(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.232 [Reserved]
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**







Merrill
      Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.


250
      Vesey
      Street


4
      World
      Financial Center, 10th Floor


New
      York,
      New York 10080





Option
      One Mortgage Corporation


3
      Ada


Irvine,
      California 92618





Attention:
      Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series 2006-OPT1





Re:
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of September 1,
      2006
      among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as depositor, Option One Mortgage
      Corporation, as servicer, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee,
      relating to Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed
      Certificates, Series 2006-OPT1





I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.







Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee




/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

)

vs. ) 2:06cr178-SRW

)

CARRIE J. FLOWERS )

)

JUROR QUESTIONNAIRE CERTIFICATION

I, ____________________________, counsel for _________________________, do

hereby certify that I will keep confidential the information contained in the juror questionnaires 

and that I agree to be responsible for their receipt, review, maintenance, and destruction. No 

copies of the questionnaires will be allowed to leave my office, either electronically or in hard copy. 

Upon completion of the empaneling of the jury I will ensure that all copies (including electronic 

copies) of the questionnaires of all jurors, including the questionnaires of the jurors selected to 

serve, are immediately destroyed and the disc is returned to the court at the time of jury selection.

I, the undersigned, make this representation with the understanding that any 

dissemination of juror information, either intentional or negligent, will subject me and my client 

to sanction as a violation of this court’s instructions to keep all juror information confidential.

I, the undersigned, authorize my staff to obtain on my behalf the juror 

questionnaires and certify that they will keep confidential the information contained in the juror 

questionnaires.

Signature of Counsel of Record: _________________________________

Printed Name of Counsel of Record: _____________________________

Date: ___________________

If applicable, signature of Person Obtaining Questionnaires: _____________________________

Printed Name of Person Obtaining Questionnaires: ____________________________________

Date: ___________________

Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 18-2 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:94cr4071-WS

STEFFANY FRAZIER,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 95)

docketed March 8, 2005. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's 

motion (doc. 94) to reevaluate his sentence be summarily dismissed. The defendant

has filed objections (doc. 99) to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, the court has determined that the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation must be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 95) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

Case 4:94-cr-04071-WS-CAS Document 100 Filed 05/17/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:94cr4071-WS

2. The defendant's motion (doc. 94) to reevaluate sentence is hereby summarily

DISMISSED.

DONE AND ORDERED this May 17, 2005.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:94-cr-04071-WS-CAS Document 100 Filed 05/17/05 Page 2 of 2
# 2008 PM2.5 Plan 

# This appendix was submitted by the eight Regional Metropolitan Planning

Organizations of the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin



# Appendix C

Conformity Budgets Documentation

# 2008 PM2.5 Plan 

# This page intentionally blank.San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District April 30, 2008Appendix C: Conformity Budgets Documentation2008 PM2.5 PlanAppendix C-1Appendix C: Conformity Budgets DocumentationSan Joaquin Valley MVEB Estimates(tons per annual day)CAC UTD (where available)* Budget is established by rounding emissions total to the next highest tenth.2009 Motor Vehicle Emissions BudgetsCountyFresnoKernKingsMaderaMercedSan JoaquinStanislausTularePM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOxBaseline EMFAC2007 2.15 60.78 3.42 95.67 0.69 19.380.57 15.10 1.42 36.50 1.5141.76 0.95 27.51 0.81 24.84Adopted State and Local Measures not includedin EMFAC 20070.02 4.35 0.03 8.07 0.01 1.57 0.01 1.080.01 2.92 0.01 2.74 0.01 1.80 0.01 1.58ARB 2007 State Strategy 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Total2.13 56.43 3.39 87.60 0.68 17.81 0.56 14.021.41 33.58 1.50 39.02 0.94 25.71 0.80 23.26Budget* 2.2 56.5 3.4 87.7 0.7 17.9 0.6 14.1 1.5 33.6 1.6 39.1 1.0 25.8 0.9 23.3San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District April 30, 2008Appendix C: Conformity Budgets Documentation2008 PM2.5 PlanAppendix C-22012 Motor Vehicle Emissions BudgetsCountyFresnoKernKingsMaderaMercedSan JoaquinStanislausTularePM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOxBaseline EMFAC2007 1.82 47.82 2.98 81.58 0.59 16.000.50 12.30 1.19 29.15 1.3935.24 0.84 22.25 0.75 20.87Adopted State and Local Measures not includedin EMFAC 20070.02 3.64 0.03 7.44 0.01 1.41 0.01 0.950.01 2.52 0.01 2.48 0.01 1.54 0.01 1.42ARB 2007 State Strategy 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Total1.80 44.18 2.95 74.14 0.58 14.59 0.49 11.351.18 26.63 1.38 32.76 0.83 20.71 0.74 19.45Budget* 1.9 44.2 3.0 74.2 0.6 14.6 0.5 11.4 1.2 26.7 1.4 32.8 0.9 20.8 0.8 19.52014 Motor Vehicle Emissions BudgetsCountyFresnoKernKingsMaderaMercedSan JoaquinStanislausTularePM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOxBaseline EMFAC2007 1.65 40.60 2.63 70.28 0.46 13.520.46 10.62 1.05 24.67 1.2930.27 0.76 18.69 0.69 17.88Adopted State and Local Measures not includedin EMFAC 20070.02 3.35 0.03 6.95 0.01 1.29 0.01 0.900.02 2.32 0.01 2.29 0.01 1.37 0.01 1.31ARB 2007 State Strategy 0.61 11.311.27 21.76 0.24 4.23 0.17 3.04 0.467.61 0.43 7.74 0.26 4.95 0.23 4.43Total1.02 25.94 1.33 41.57 0.21 8.00 0.28 6.680.57 14.74 0.86 20.24 0.49 12.37 0.45 12.14Budget* 1.1 26.0 1.4 41.6 0.3 8.1 0.3 6.7 0.6 14.8 0.9 20.3 0.5 12.4 0.5 12.2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Taylor, Appellant.

Submitted June 11, 2007;

decided September 4, 2007

Reported below, 42 AD3d 13.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JUAN RAMON JIMENEZ-PABON,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-571-TKW/MAF

WILLIAM BAR, et al.,

Respondents.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 5). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed for failure to 

prosecute and mootness. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this day 22nd of February, 2021. 

T. Kent Wetherell, II

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00571-TKW-MAF Document 7 Filed 02/22/21 Page 1 of 1
49.105-1 Termination status reports.

When the TCO and contracting officer are in different activities, the TCO will furnish periodic status

reports on termination actions to the contracting office upon request. The contracting office shall

specify the information required.

Parent topic: 49.105 Duties of termination contracting officer after issuance of notice of

termination.
State Plant Name 

2001-2012 

Low Rolling 

Annual 

Average

95th 

percentile 

low rolling 

annual 

average

2001-2012 

Average

Percent 

improvemen

t using 2001-

2012 

average and 

low rolling 

annual 

average

Percent 

improvemen

t using 95th 

percentile 

and 2001-

2012 

average

Nameplate 

Capacity

(MW)

AR White Bluff 2026 2049 2175 6.85% 5.79% 900.0

CO Rawhide 1869 1877 2067 9.58% 9.19% 293.6

CO Craig 1919 1927 1982 3.18% 2.77% 534.8

FL Crystal River 1981 2004 2100 5.67% 4.57% 739.2

IA George Neal North 1943 1968 2044 4.94% 3.72% 549.8

IA Ottumwa 2118 2147 2322 8.79% 7.54% 725.9

IL E D Edwards 2006 2088 2199 8.78% 5.05% 136.0

IN F B Culley 1880 1916 2214 15.09% 13.46% 265.2

IN Cayuga 1736 1747 1878 7.56% 6.98% 531.0

IN Merom 1936 1961 2070 6.47% 5.27% 540.0

IN Gibson 1726 1736 1817 5.01% 4.46% 667.9

KY H L Spurlock 1732 1779 1894 8.55% 6.07% 357.6

KY Mill Creek 1654 1676 1794 7.80% 6.58% 355.5

KY Ghent 1840 1849 1934 4.86% 4.40% 556.5

LA Big Cajun 2 1956 1961 2126 8.00% 7.76% 619.0

MI Dan E Karn 1976 1989 2043 3.28% 2.64% 136.0

MO Rush Island 1705 1845 1910 10.73% 3.40% 621.0

MO Iatan 1940 1949 2152 9.85% 9.43% 726.0

MT Colstrip 2092 2140 2279 8.21% 6.10% 358.0

Navajo Four Corners 1752 1773 1862 5.91% 4.78% 818.1

NC Belews Creek 1677 1688 1765 4.99% 4.36% 1080.1

ND Milton R Young 2105 2126 2244 6.19% 5.26% 477.0

NE Sheldon 2091 2141 2323 9.99% 7.83% 108.8

NE Nebraska City 1911 1926 1982 3.58% 2.83% 651.6

NY Somerset Operating Co LLC 1740 1759 1845 5.69% 4.66% 655.1

OH Muskingum River 1835 1840 1887 2.76% 2.49% 237.5

OH FirstEnergy W H Sammis1723 1733 1854 7.07% 6.53% 190.4

OH Walter C Beckjord 1763 1770 1945 9.36% 9.00% 244.8

OH J M Stuart 1773 1777 1919 7.61% 7.40% 610.2

OH Cardinal 1741 1758 1831 4.92% 3.99% 615.2

OH Miami Fort 1585 1650 1894 16.31% 12.88% 557.1

PA PPL Brunner Island 1538 1548 1641 6.28% 5.67% 405.0

PA Hatfields Ferry Power Station 1716 1794 1941 11.59% 7.57% 576.0

PA Keystone 1733 1740 1811 4.31% 3.92% 936.0

PA Keystone 1803 1809 1842 2.12% 1.79% 936.0

PA Conemaugh 1682 1707 1802 6.66% 5.27% 936.0

PA FirstEnergy Bruce Mansfield 1659 1687 1811 8.39% 6.85% 913.7

SC Cross 1737 1826 1998 13.06% 8.61% 590.9

TN Cumberland 1784 1815 1941 8.09% 6.49% 1300.0
TX Harrington 1810 1849 2190 17.35% 15.57% 360.0

TX Fayette Power Project 1920 1937 2016 4.76% 3.92% 615.0

TX W A Parish 1877 1891 2015 6.85% 6.15% 734.1

TX Martin Lake 2092 2113 2183 4.17% 3.21% 793.2

TX J K Spruce 1921 1980 2157 10.94% 8.21% 878.0

VA Clinch River 1660 1692 1803 7.93% 6.16% 237.5

WV Mt Storm 1945 1954 2052 5.21% 4.78% 570.2

WV John E Amos 1773 1782 1879 5.64% 5.16% 1300.0

WY Jim Bridger 1956 2001 2119 7.69% 5.57% 577.9

WY Laramie River Station 2107 2153 2265 6.98% 4.94% 570.0

AR Independence Unit One2050 2058 2121 3.35% 2.97% 900.0

IL Powerton Unit Six 1871 1923 2182 14.25% 11.87% 892.8

IL Joppa Unit Two 1866 2040 2116 11.81% 3.59% 183.3

AVERAGE 1,851 1,882 2,005 7.60% 6.07% 597
159 So.2d 286

#### Hilda Beth McGUFFIN et al. v. Claud JONES.

No. 47026.

Jan. 20, 1964.

In re: Hilda Beth McGuffin et al. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of LaSalle. 157 So.2d 256.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal its judgment is correct.
#### § 51.2759 Broken.

*Broken* means that more than one-fourth of the peanut kernel is broken off.
52.232-21 [Reserved]

Parent topic: 52.232 [Reserved]
#### § 75.1 Meaning of words.

Words used in the regulations in this part in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural and vice versa, as the case may demand.
#### § 624.9 Time limits.

Funds must be obligated by the State Conservationist and construction completed within 220 calendar days after the date funds are committed to the State Conservationist, except for exigency situations in which case the construction must be completed within 10 days after the date the funds are committed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                         5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Angeles
Partners  XIV 2000 First  Quarter  10-QSB and is  qualified  in its  entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                             0000759859
<NAME>                            Angeles Partners XIV
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000


<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              1,147
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                             28,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                     18,818
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     11,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                            29,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (27,994)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       11,318
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    1,259
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    1,718
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    847
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (459)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (10.42)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
52.242 [Reserved]

52.242-1 Notice of Intent to Disallow Costs.

52.242-2 Production Progress Reports.

52.242-3 Penalties for Unallowable Costs.

52.242-4 Certification of Final Indirect Costs.

52.242-5 Payments to Small Business Subcontractors.

52.242-6 [Reserved]

52.242-7 [Reserved]

52.242-8 [Reserved]

52.242-9 [Reserved]

52.242-10 [Reserved]

52.242-11 [Reserved]

52.242-12 [Reserved]

52.242-13 Bankruptcy.

52.242-14 Suspension of Work.

52.242-15 Stop-Work Order.

52.242-16 [Reserved]

52.242-17 Government Delay of Work.

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses