This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains notices to the public of the proposed

issuance of rules and regulations. The

purpose of these notices is to give interested

persons an opportunity to participate in the

rule making prior to the adoption of the final

rules.

Proposed Rules Federal Register

50145 

Vol. 76, No. 156 

Friday, August 12, 2011 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

10 CFR Part 430 

[Docket Number EERE–2011–BT–TP–0054] 

RIN 1904–AC63 

Energy Conservation Program: Test 

Procedures for Residential Clothes 

Dryers 

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy, Department of 

Energy. 

ACTION: Request for information. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Energy (DOE) has initiated a test 

procedure rulemaking for residential 

clothes dryers to further investigate the 

effects of automatic cycle termination 

on the energy efficiency. DOE 

specifically is seeking information, data, 

and comments regarding methods for 

more accurately measuring the effects of 

automatic cycle termination in the 

residential clothes dryer test procedure. 

DOE will address the issues 

surrounding testing of automatic cycle 

termination sensors in this rulemaking 

prior to the compliance date of amended 

energy conservation standards recently 

adopted for residential clothes dryers. 

To the extent required by the statute, 

DOE will also address any potential 

impacts on the amended energy 

conservation standards resulting from 

these test procedure amendments 

during the rulemaking process. 

DATES: Written comments and 

information are requested on or before 

September 12, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

encouraged to submit comments using 

the Federal eRulemaking Portal at 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Alternatively, interested persons may 

submit comments, identified by docket 

number EERE–2011–BT–TP–0054 and/ 

or RIN 1904–AC63, by any of the 

following methods: 

• E-mail: RCDAT-2011-TP0054@ee.doe.gov. Include docket 

number EERE–2011–BT–TP–0054 and/ 

or RIN 1904–AC63 in the subject line of 

the message. Submit electronic 

comments in WordPerfect, Microsoft 

Word, PDF, or ASCII file format and 

avoid the use of special characters or 

any form of encryption. 

• Postal Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, 

U.S. Department of Energy, Building 

Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J, 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0121. 

Telephone: (202) 586–2945. Please 

submit one signed original paper copy. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda 

Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, 

Building Technologies Program, 950 

L’Enfant Plaza, SW., 6th Floor, 

Washington, DC 20024. Please submit 

one signed original paper copy. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents, or 

comments received, go to the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information may 

be sent to Mr. Stephen Witkowski, U.S. 

Department of Energy, Office of Energy 

Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 

Building Technologies Program, EE–2J, 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0121. 

Telephone: 202–586–7463. E-mail: 

Stephen.Witkowski@ee.doe.gov. 

In the Office of the General Counsel, 

contact Ms. Elizabeth Kohl, U.S. 

Department of Energy, 1000 

Independence Ave., SW, Room 6A–179, 

Washington, DC 20585. Telephone: 

202–586–7796; E-mail: 

Elizabeth.Kohl@hq.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

January 6, 2011, DOE published in the 

Federal Register a final rule for the 

residential clothes dryer and room air 

conditioner test procedure rulemaking 

(76 FR 972) (January TP final rule), in 

which it (1) adopted the provisions for 

the measurement of standby mode and 

off mode power use for those products; 

and (2) adopted several amendments to 

the clothes dryer and room air 

conditioner test procedures concerning 

the active mode for these products. 76 

FR 972 (Jan. 6, 2011). In the January TP 

final rule, DOE declined to adopt the 

amendments to more accurately 

measure automatic cycle termination 

that were originally proposed in the test 

procedure supplemental notice of 

proposed rulemaking (June TP SNOPR) 

(75 FR 37594, 37612–37620 (June 29, 

2010)). As further discussed in the 

January TP final rule, DOE conducted 

testing of representative residential 

clothes dryers using the automatic cycle 

termination test procedure proposed in 

the June TP SNOPR. The results of the 

testing revealed that all of the clothes 

dryers tested significantly over-dried the 

DOE test load to near bone dry and, as 

a result, the measured energy factor (EF) 

values were significantly lower than EF 

values obtained using the existing DOE 

test procedure. The test data also 

indicated that clothes dryers equipped 

with automatic termination controls 

would be considered less efficient than 

timer dryers. 76 FR 977. 

As noted in the January TP final rule, 

DOE believes the test procedure 

amendments for automatic cycle 

termination proposed in the June TP 

SNOPR do not adequately measure the 

energy consumption of clothes dryers 

equipped with such systems using the 

test load specified in the DOE test 

procedure. DOE believes that clothes 

dryers with automatic termination 

sensing control systems, which infer the 

remaining moisture content (RMC) of 

the load from the properties of the 

exhaust air such as temperature and 

humidity, may be designed differently 

than the procedures in the June TP 

SNOPR considered. Specifically, DOE 

believes these types of dryers are 

designed to stop the cycle when the 

consumer load has a higher RMC than 

the RMC obtained using the proposed 

automatic cycle termination test 

procedure in conjunction with the 

existing test load. However, in 

considering whether other test loads 

would be appropriate to incorporate 

into the DOE test procedure to produce 

both representative and repeatable test 

results, DOE notes that manufacturers 

have also indicated that test load types 

and test cloth materials different than 

those specified in the DOE test 

procedure do not produce results as 

repeatable as those obtained using the 

test load as currently specified. 76 FR 

977. 

In support of its test procedure 

rulemaking, DOE conducts in-depth 

technical analyses of publicly available 

test standards and other relevant 

information. DOE continually seeks data 

and public input to improve its testing 

methodologies to more accurately reflect 

consumer use. In general, DOE is 

requesting comment and supporting 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
50146 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

data regarding methods for more 

accurately measuring the effects of 

automatic cycle termination. 

Additionally, DOE seeks comment and 

information on the specific topics 

below: 

Test Load Characteristics 

DOE notes that the current test 

procedure specifies that tests be 

conducted using a cotton momie test 

cloths that are each 24 inches by 36 

inches in dimensions and are a blend of 

50-percent cotton and 50-percent 

polyester. DOE recognizes that this test 

load may not be representative of realworld laundry loads dried by consumers 

and that manufacturers may be 

designing their automatic cycle 

termination control systems to achieve 

higher final moisture contents closer to 

5-percent RMC when drying real-world 

laundry loads even though the same 

drying process conducted with the DOE 

test cloth would result in a much lower 

RMC. However, DOE also notes that 

manufacturers have indicated that test 

load types and test cloth materials 

different than those specified in the 

DOE test procedure do not produce 

results as repeatable as those obtained 

using the test load as currently 

specified. DOE has requested 

information on the characteristics of 

real-world laundry loads dried by 

consumers from a laundry detergent 

manufacturer that develops a significant 

amount of consumer usage data, but has 

not yet received any such data. 

DOE notes that the Association of 

Home Appliance Manufacturers 

(AHAM) clothes dryer test standard 

HLD–1–2009, ‘‘Household Tumble Type 

Clothes Dryers,’’ and the International 

Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) test 

standard 61121, ‘‘Tumble dryers for 

household use—Methods for measuring 

the performance,’’ Edition 3 (2005) both 

specify a test load consisting of cotton 

bed sheets, towels, and pillowcases. As 

noted in the January TP final rule, DOE 

believes that clothes dryers with 

automatic termination sensing control 

systems, which infer the RMC of the 

load from the properties of the exhaust 

air such as temperature and humidity, 

may be designed to stop the cycle when 

the consumer load has a higher RMC 

than the RMC obtained using the 

automatic cycle termination test 

procedure proposed in the June TP 

SNOPR in conjunction with the existing 

test load. To investigate this, DOE 

conducted limited additional testing 

using a test load similar to that specified 

in AHAM Standard HLD–1–2009. For 

tests on two clothes dryers using the 

same automatic cycle termination 

settings (i.e., normal cycle setting and 

highest temperature setting), the 

alternate test load was dried to 1.7 to 2.2 

percent final RMC, with an average 

RMC of 2.0 percent. In comparison, the 

same clothes dryer under the same cycle 

settings dried the DOE test load to 0.3 

to 1.2 percent RMC, with an average 

RMC of 0.7 percent. 

• DOE requests consumer usage data 

on the characteristics of laundry loads 

dried by consumers, including material 

(i.e., cotton, polyester, etc.), type (i.e., 

t-shirts, towels, bed sheets, jeans, etc.), 

and quantity. 

• DOE seeks comment on its limited 

testing comparing the current DOE test 

load to one similar to the AHAM and 

IEC test standard loads, described 

above. DOE also requests information 

and test data comparing the measured 

energy use of different test loads, 

including the AHAM and IEC test 

standard loads, to the DOE test load 

using the same automatic cycle 

termination settings. Please indicate the 

cycle settings used when providing data 

(when possible use the ‘‘normal’’ cycle 

or the cycle recommended by 

manufacturers for drying cotton or linen 

clothes). Please also indicate the type of 

sensor technology used for the clothes 

dryers under test (e.g., temperature 

sensors or moisture sensors) and the 

starting and final moisture content of 

the test load (when possible use the 

starting moisture content of 57.5 percent 

with an 8.45 pound (lb) test load for 

standard size dryers and 3.00 lb test 

load for compact dryers). 

• DOE requests test data on the 

repeatability of alternate test loads using 

automatic cycle termination, including 

those specified in the AHAM test 

standard HLD–1–2009 and other realworld loads. 

Accuracy of Different Automatic Cycle 

Termination Sensors and Controls 

DOE recognizes that different 

automatic cycle termination sensor 

technologies and control strategies may 

measure the remaining moisture content 

in a laundry load during the drying 

cycle to varying accuracy. However, 

through DOE’s testing conducted for the 

January TP final rule using the DOE test 

cloth, shown in the table below, DOE 

was unable to determine whether 

certain sensor technologies more 

accurately measure the moisture content 

of the laundry load during the drying 

cycle (i.e., DOE was unable to 

distinguish between sensor 

technologies). 

TABLE 1—DOE CLOTHES DRYER AUTOMATIC CYCLE TERMINATION TESTS (TABLE III.8 IN FINAL RULE NOTICE WITH

SENSOR TECHNOLOGY IDENTIFIED) 

Test unit Sensor technology 

Current 

DOE test 

procedure 

EF lb/kWh * 

Current 

DOE test 

procedure 

w/modified 

field use 

factor ** 

EF lb/kWh 

June TP SNOPR automatic cycle 

termination procedure 

EF lb/kWh Percent 

change 

Final RMC 

(percent) 

Vented Electric Standard: 

Unit 3 ..................................... Moisture + Temp .......................... 3.20 2.82 2.59 ¥19.1 1.0 

Unit 4 ..................................... Temperature ................................. 3.28 2.89 2.59 ¥21.2 0.6 

Vented Gas: 

Unit 8 ..................................... Temperature ................................. 2.83 2.50 2.42 ¥14.5 0.4 

Unit 9 ..................................... Temperature ................................. 2.85 2.51 2.38 ¥16.3 0.9 

Unit 11 ................................... Moisture + Temp .......................... 2.98 2.63 2.40 ¥19.5 0.9 

Vented Electric Compact 240V: 

Unit 12 ................................... Moisture + Temp .......................... 3.19 2.81 2.64 ¥17.3 0.5 

Unit 13 ................................... Temperature ................................. 2.93 2.59 2.27 ¥22.7 1.4 

Vented Electric Compact 120V: 

Unit 14 ................................... Moisture + Temp .......................... 3.23 2.85 1.98 ¥38.8 0.7 

Ventless Electric Compact 240V: 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules 50147 

1NRDC, No. 30 at pp. 1–40. Public comment 

submitted in docket number EERE–2007–BT–STD– 

0010. 

TABLE 1—DOE CLOTHES DRYER AUTOMATIC CYCLE TERMINATION TESTS (TABLE III.8 IN FINAL RULE NOTICE WITH

SENSOR TECHNOLOGY IDENTIFIED)—Continued 

Test unit Sensor technology 

Current 

DOE test 

procedure 

EF lb/kWh * 

Current 

DOE test 

procedure 

w/modified 

field use 

factor ** 

EF lb/kWh 

June TP SNOPR automatic cycle 

termination procedure 

EF lb/kWh Percent 

change 

Final RMC 

(percent) 

Unit 15 ................................... Moisture + Temp .......................... 2.37 2.09 2.07 ¥12.4 1.1 

* Tests use the appropriate field use factor of 1.04 for clothes dryers with automatic termination. 

** Field use factor changed from the nominal 1.04 for clothes dryers with automatic termination to 1.18, which is normally for timer dryers. 

• DOE requests information and data 

on the accuracy of different sensor 

technologies and control strategies (e.g., 

temperature sensors, moisture sensors, 

or a combination of both) in their ability 

to measure the remaining moisture 

content of the laundry load. Please 

indicate the cycle settings used when 

providing data (when possible use the 

‘‘normal’’ cycle or the cycle 

recommended by manufacturers for 

drying cotton or linen clothes). Please 

also indicate the type of sensor 

technology used for the clothes dryers 

under test (e.g., temperature sensors or 

moisture sensors) and the starting and 

final moisture content of the test load 

(when possible use the starting moisture 

content of 57.5 percent with an 8.45 

pound (lb) test load for standard size 

dryers and 3.00 lb test load for compact 

dryers). 

• DOE requests data on the target 

RMC used by manufacturers when 

designing and programming automatic 

cycle termination controls that 

maintains consumer satisfaction. DOE 

also requests information on how the 

target RMC varies by clothes dryer 

capacity. As noted in the table above, 

the final measured RMC from testing of 

DOE’s sample ranged from 0.4 percent 

to 1.4 percent, with an average of 0.8 

percent. 

Water Conditions 

DOE notes that the IEC is currently 

revising its test standard for clothes 

dryers, that is, IEC Standard 61121. As 

part of its revised draft, the IEC notes 

that the characteristics of the water used 

for wetting the test load prior to the test, 

particularly the conductivity, can have 

a large influence on test results when 

testing automatic cycle termination 

clothes dryers with moisture sensors. 

Clothes dryers with moisture sensors 

use conductivity sensor bars to 

determine the amount of moisture in the 

load when the load comes in contact 

with the sensors. The following table 

provides the characteristics of either soft 

or hard water to be used for appliance 

testing under IEC Standard 61121. 

TABLE 2—COMPOSITION OF SOFT AND HARD WATER FOR APPLIANCE TESTING

Property Unit 

Water type 

Standard 

soft water 

Standard 

hard water 

Total hardness .............................................................. mmol/l (Ca2+/Mg2+) ....................................................... 0.50 ± 0.20 2.50 ± 0.20 

Conductivity (at 20 °C) ................................................. μS/cm ........................................................................... 150 ± 50 750 ± 150 

DOE is not aware of any data 

regarding the effects of conductivity of 

the water used to wet the test load on 

the measured efficiency. 

• DOE requests information and data 

on the effects of conductivity of the 

water supply used to wet the test load 

prior to drying cycle tests on the 

measured efficiency using automatic 

cycle termination. In particular, DOE 

requests data on the effects of using 

unaltered water supplies versus water 

supplies adjusted to meet the 

specifications in the draft version of IEC 

61121. Please indicate the cycle settings 

used when providing data (when 

possible use the ‘‘normal’’ cycle or the 

cycle recommended by manufacturers 

for drying cotton or linen clothes). 

Please also indicate the type of sensor 

technology used for the clothes dryers 

under test (e.g., temperature sensors or 

moisture sensors) and the starting and 

final moisture content of the test load 

(when possible use the starting moisture 

content of 57.5 percent with an 8.45 

pound (lb) test load for standard size 

dryers and 3.00 lb test load for compact 

dryers). 

• DOE requests data on any potential 

burden associated with requirements for 

and adjustments to the water supply 

used for wetting the test load. 

Cycle Settings—ECOS Test Results 

DOE notes that ECOS Consulting 

(ECOS) conducted a testing program for 

the Natural Resources Defense Council 

(NRDC) to evaluate clothes dryer 

automatic cycle termination.1 (The 

ECOS report stated that the difference 

between a standard clothes dryer and 

one that is effective at turning itself off 

when clothes are actually dry is about 

0.76 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per load 

(5,000 kWh over typical lifetime). The 

ECOS report also stated that automatic 

termination cycles using lower heat 

settings or lower dryness level reduce 

energy consumption and increase 

efficiency because less energy is spent 

heating air, cloth, and metal. The ECOS 

report summarized testing results for 

one clothes dryer that showed that the 

difference in energy consumption 

between the highest and lowest heat 

settings was 13 percent and that the 

drying time increased (from 35 to 49 

minutes), but very similar final RMCs 

were achieved. 

• DOE requests information and data 

on consumer usage habits regarding 

cycles selected for drying. In your 

responses, please be specific by 

indicating general cycle settings, 

temperature settings, and dryness level 

settings used by consumers. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
50148 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

• DOE requests additional 

information and data on the effects of 

using different automatic cycle 

termination settings. When providing 

test results, please also indicate the type 

of sensor technology used for the 

clothes dryers under test (e.g., 

temperature sensors or moisture 

sensors) and the starting and final 

moisture content of the test load (when 

possible use the starting moisture 

content of 57.5 percent with an 8.45 

pound (lb) test load for standard size 

dryers and 3.00 lb test load for compact 

dryers). 

• DOE requests comments on 

methodology for accounting for various 

cycle setting options in the DOE test 

procedure. In particular, if interested 

parties believe that DOE should test 

multiple cycles, please provide 

consumer usage data on the percentage 

of drying cycles that consumers use for 

each automatic cycle termination 

setting. 

• DOE also requests comment on the 

additional testing burden associated 

with a requirement to measure multiple 

cycle settings. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on August 9, 

2011. 

Roland J. Risser, 

Program Manager, Building Technologies 

Program, Energy Efficiency and Renewable 

Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20604 Filed 8–11–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

10 CFR Part 431 

[Docket Number EERE–2010–BT–STD– 

0051] 

RIN 1904–AC62 

Notice of Intent to Negotiate Proposed 

Rule on Energy Efficiency Standards 

for Distribution Transformers 

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy, Department of 

Energy. 

ACTION: Notice of intent to establish a 

subcommittee and negotiate a proposed 

rule. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Energy (DOE or the Department) is 

giving notice that it intends to establish 

a negotiated rulemaking subcommittee 

under ERAC in accordance with the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(FACA) and the Negotiated Rulemaking 

Act (NRA) to negotiate proposed Federal 

standards for the energy efficiency of 

low-voltage dry-type distribution 

transformers. The purpose of the 

subcommittee will be to discuss and, if 

possible, reach consensus on a proposed 

rule for the energy efficiency of 

distribution transformers, as authorized 

by the Energy Policy Conservation Act 

(EPCA) of 1975, as amended. The 

subcommittee will consist of 

representatives of parties having a 

defined stake in the outcome of the 

proposed standards, and will consult as 

appropriate with a range of experts on 

technical issues. 

DATES: Written comments and requests 

to be appointed as members of the 

subcommittee are welcome and should 

be submitted by August 29, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons may 

submit comments, identified by docket 

number EERE–2011–BT–STD–0051, by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• E-mail: LVDT-2011-STD0051@ee.doe.gov. Include EERE–2011– 

BT–STD–0051 and/or RIN 1904–AC62 

in the subject line of the message. 

• Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. 

Department of Energy, Building 

Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J, 

EERE–2011–BT–STD–0051 and/or RIN 

1904–AC62, 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585– 

0121. Phone: (202) 586–2945. Please 

submit one signed paper original. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda 

Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, 

Building Technologies Program, 6th 

Floor, 950 L’Enfant Plaza, SW., 

Washington, DC 20024. Phone: (202) 

586–2945. Please submit one signed 

paper original. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

docket number or RIN for this 

rulemaking. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents, a copy of 

the transcript of the public meeting, or 

comments received, go to the U.S. 

Department of Energy, 6th Floor, 950 

L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 

20024, (202) 586–2945, between 9 a.m. 

and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. Please call Ms. 

Brenda Edwards at (202) 586–2945 for 

additional information regarding 

visiting the Resource Room. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Cymbalsky, U.S. Department of Energy, 

Office of Building Technologies (EE–2J), 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0121. 

Telephone: (202) 287–1692. E-mail: 

John.Cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov. Ms. 

Jennifer Tiedeman, U.S. Department of 

Energy, Office of the General Counsel 

(GC–71), 1000 Independence Ave., SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0121. 

Telephone: (202) 287–6111. E-mail: 

Jennifer.Tiedeman@hq.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Preamble 

I. Statutory Authority 

II. Background 

III. Proposed Negotiating Procedures 

IV. Comments Requested 

I. Statutory Authority 

This notice announcing DOE’s intent 

to negotiate a proposed regulation 

setting energy efficiency standards for 

distribution transformers was developed 

under the authority of sections 563 and 

564 of the NRA (5 U.S.C. 561–570, Pub. 

L. 104–320). The regulation setting 

energy efficiency standards for 

distribution transformers that DOE is 

proposing to develop under a negotiated 

rulemaking will be developed under the 

authority of EPCA, as amended, 42 

U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(C) and 6317(a). 

II. Background 

As required by the NRA, DOE is 

giving notice that it is establishing a 

subcommittee under ERAC to develop 

proposed energy efficiency standards for 

distribution transformers. 

EPCA, as amended, directs DOE to 

adopt energy conservation standards for 

those distribution transformers for 

which standards would be 

technologically feasible and 

economically justified, and would result 

in significant energy savings. (42 U.S.C. 

6317(a)(2)). DOE published a final rule 

in October 2007 that established energy 

conservation standards for liquidimmersed and medium-voltage dry-type 

(MVDT) distribution transformers. 72 

FR 58190 (October 12, 2007); see 10 CFR 

431.196(b)–(c). During the course of that 

rulemaking, the Energy Policy Act of 

2005 (EPACT 2005), Public Law 109–58, 

amended EPCA to set standards for lowvoltage dry-type (LVDT) distribution 

transformers. (EPACT 2005, Section 

135(c); codified at 42 U.S.C. 6295(y)) 

Consequently, DOE removed these 

transformers from the scope of that 

rulemaking. 72 FR at 58191 (October 12, 

2007). 

On July 29, 2011, DOE published a 

notice of its intent to establish a 

subcommittee under the ERAC to 

negotiate a proposed rule for liquidimmersed and MVDT distribution 

transformers (76 FR 45472). The 

negotiated rulemaking contemplated in 

today’s notice is complimentary of that 

process. 

A. Negotiated Rulemaking 

DOE has decided to use the negotiated 

rulemaking process to develop proposed 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1