alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2019002DE.01002701.xml

| 4.1.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 2/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2019

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 2/27

---

Berichtigung der Leitlinie (EU) 2015/510 der Europäischen Zentralbank vom 19. Dezember 2014 über die Umsetzung des geldpolitischen Handlungsrahmens des Eurosystems (Leitlinie allgemeine Dokumentation) (EZB/2014/60)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 91 vom 2. April 2015
  )

Auf Seite 9, Artikel 2 Nummer 13:

Anstatt:

„
  ‚Kreditforderung‘ (credit claim) bezeichnet eine Geldforderung, die eine Verbindlichkeit eines Schuldners gegenüber einem Geschäftspartner ist. Kreditforderungen umfassen auch Schuldscheindarlehen und eingetragene Forderungen aus Privatkrediten an die niederländische Zentralregierung oder sonstige notenbankfähige Schuldner, die durch eine staatliche Garantie besichert sind, z. B. Wohnungsbaugesellschaften);“

muss es heißen:

„
  ‚Kreditforderung‘ (credit claim) bezeichnet einen Anspruch auf Rückzahlung eines Geldbetrags, der eine Verbindlichkeit eines Schuldners gegenüber einem Geschäftspartner darstellt. Kreditforderungen umfassen auch Schuldscheindarlehen und eingetragene Forderungen aus Privatkrediten an die niederländische Zentralregierung oder sonstige notenbankfähige Schuldner, die durch eine staatliche Garantie besichert sind, z. B. Wohnungsbaugesellschaften;“

---
#### In the Matter of SOMA Partners, LLC, Respondent, v Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc., Appellant.

Submitted August 6, 2007;

decided October 16, 2007

Reported below, 41 AD3d 257.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
RAB/98-22

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Railroad Accident Brief Report

CHI 97 FR 010

GRADE CROSSING COLLISION/DERAILMENT

DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT

DALLAS, TEXAS

JUNE 3, 1997

Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) train No. 114, consisting of two

articulated light-rail-vehicles (LRV) struck a Caterpillar front-end loader (earth

moving machine) at the intersection of Lancaster Road and Fordham Road in

Dallas, Texas at 4:55 p.m., central daylight time, on June 3, 1997. The train was

traveling at a recorded speed of 37 mph in 35-mph territory when the accident

occurred. The lead wheels of the lead car, LRV 114, were derailed, and 19 of

the 20 passengers on the train sustained minor injuries. The operator of the

front-end loader sustained a broken arm, lacerations and contusions. The

damages associated with the accident were about $920,166.

The tracks were in the median of the highway, and trains operated in the

same direction as the vehicular traffic (meaning trains approached the crossings

from the rear of left turning vehicles). The grade crossing protection was

provided by highway traffic signals which were interlocked with railroad signals at

the crossings.

When the traffic signals on Fordham Road display a proceed indication,

the train signals would display a stop indication. The train signals were also at

the stop indication when the left-turn signals on Lancaster Road were displayed.

The signal system was designed with a 1-second delay between the time the left

turn signal turned red, until the train signal turned to proceed. Postaccident tests

and inspection of the signal system conducted by highway signal maintenance

technicians and a highway signal engineer with the City of Dallas indicated that

the signals at the accident intersection operated as designed.

The train operator stated that as the train approached the crossing he

observed that all the traffic signals for northbound through traffic on Lancaster

Road, as well as for left-turning traffic, were red. There was highway traffic

stopped in all lanes, with the front-end loader stopped in the left turn lane. As the

train neared the crossing, the traffic signals for northbound through traffic on
2

Lancaster Road turned to green, and the train signal also turned to proceed. The

left turn arrow stayed at red.

The train operator stated that when the traffic signals turned to green, the

vehicles in all three lanes, including the front-end loader in the left turn lane,

began to move, and the loader turned directly in front of the train, even though

the left turn arrow was still red. The driver of the front-end loader stated that he

could not remember anything, and he did not recall the color of the left turn

arrow.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable

cause of this accident was the driver of the front-end loader for some unknown

reason proceeded through a red traffic light and turned left, directly into the path

of the oncoming train.

Adopted: August 18, 1998
52.236-2 Differing Site Conditions.       As prescribed in 36.502, insert the following clause:          Differing Site Conditions (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            The Contractor shall promptly, and before the conditions are disturbed, give a written notice to the Contracting Officer of-                                                         (1) 								                Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site which differ materially from those indicated in this contract; or                                                            (2) 								                Unknown physical conditions at the site, of an unusual nature, which differ materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inhering in work of the character provided for in the contract.                                                                             (b) 						            The Contracting Officer shall investigate the site conditions promptly after receiving the notice. If the conditions do materially so differ and cause an increase or decrease in the Contractor’s cost of, or the time required for, performing any part of the work under this contract, whether or not changed as a result of the conditions, an equitable adjustment shall be made under this clause and the contract modified in writing accordingly.                                          (c) 						            No request by the Contractor for an equitable adjustment to the contract under this clause shall be allowed, unless the Contractor has given the written notice required; *provided*, that the time prescribed in paragraph (a) of this clause for giving written notice may be extended by the Contracting Officer.                                          (d) 						            No request by the Contractor for an equitable adjustment to the contract for differing site conditions shall be allowed if made after final payment under this contract.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.236 [Reserved]
§ 760.1804 Eligibility of affected production. ( a ) To be eligible for the QLA Program, an eligible crop's affected production must have suffered a quality loss due to a qualifying disaster event and had at least a 5 percent quality loss due to all eligible disaster events. Whether affected production of a crop had a 5 percent loss will be determined separately for crops with different crop types, intended uses, certified organic or conventional status, county, and crop year.
( b ) Affected production of the following is not eligible for the QLA Program: ( 1 ) Crops that were not grown commercially;
( 2 ) Crops that were intended for grazing or were grazed;
( 3 ) Crops not intended for harvest;
( 4 ) Volunteer crops;
( 5 ) Value loss crops;
( 6 ) Maple sap;
( 7 ) Honey;
( 8 ) By-products resulting from processing or harvesting a crop, such as, but not limited to, cotton seed, peanut shells, wheat or oat straw, or corn stalks or stovers;
( 9 ) First-year seeding for forage production;
( 10 ) Immature fruit crops;
( 11 ) Crops for which FCIC coverage or NAP coverage is unavailable;
( 12 ) Multiple market crops for which the producer previously received a crop insurance indemnity or WHIP+ payment for a quality loss;
( 13 ) Crops for which production used to calculate a crop insurance indemnity or WHIP+ payment was adjusted based on a comparison of the producer's sale price to FCIC established price;
( 14 ) Crops that received a crop insurance indemnity, NAP payment, or WHIP+ payment based on the quantity of production that was considered unmarketable;
( 15 ) Crops for which the producer previously received a crop insurance indemnity, NAP payment, or WHIP+ payment for which production was reported as salvage value or secondary use;
( 16 ) Sugar beets for which a member of a cooperative processor received a payment through a cooperative agreement; and
( 17 ) Crops that were destroyed.
( c ) Only affected production from initial crop acreage will be eligible for a QLA Program payment, unless the provisions for subsequent crops in this section are met. All plantings of an annual or biennial crop are considered the same as a planting of an initial crop in tropical regions as defined in part 1437, subpart F, of this title.
( d ) In cases where there is double cropped acreage, affected production of each crop may be eligible only if the specific crops are approved by the FSA State committee as eligible double cropping practices in accordance with procedures approved by the Deputy Administrator.
( e ) Participants having affected production from multiple plantings may receive payments for each planting only if the planting meets the requirements of part 1437 of this title and all other provisions of this subpart are satisfied.
52.237-2 Protection of Government

Buildings, Equipment, and Vegetation.

As prescribed in 37.110(b), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for services to

be performed on Government installations, unless a construction contract is contemplated:

Protection of Government Buildings, Equipment, and Vegetation (Apr 1984)

The Contractor shall use reasonable care to avoid damaging existing buildings, equipment, and

vegetation on the Government installation. If the Contractor’s failure to use reasonable care causes

damage to any of this property, the Contractor shall replace or repair the damage at no expense to

the Government as the Contracting Officer directs. If the Contractor fails or refuses to make such

repair or replacement, the Contractor shall be liable for the cost, which may be deducted from the

contract price.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.237 [Reserved]
#### § 63.5 Eligible organization.

*Eligible organization* means any national organization that meets the criteria provided for in § 63.105 as being eligible to submit nominations for membership on the Board.
#### § 51.896 Shattered.

*Shattered* means that the berry is separated from the bunch and may or may not have the capstem attached.

[36 FR 9126, May 20, 1971. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981. Redesignated at 56 FR 15802, Apr. 18, 1991]
Fact Sheet 

The President’s Fiscal 2003 Immigration Budget 02/04/02 (Rev.)

Interior Enforcement 

The FY 2003 budget request includes $19.7 million and 137 new positions to advance 

national security and homeland defense against terrorist cells and supporters in the United States 

by enhancing cooperation with other Federal law enforcement agencies and the intelligence 

community. The budget will also continue initiatives begun in the FY 2002 emergency counterterrorism supplemental ($21.9 million). Resources are included in this request for the 

development of a training program designed to promote awareness, recognition, and 

identification of women and children who are victimized by organizations violating the criminal 

provisions of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000. 

Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTF) 

To expand participation in FBI-led task force operations to locations requiring INS 

investigative resources, the budget will add 59 positions (48 Special Agents and 11 support 

positions). This initiative will also support efforts aimed at apprehending aliens linked to 

organized crime, violent gangs, and/or drug-trafficking organizations. ($6 million) 

International and Domestic Staffing 

 The budget requests 78 positions (22 Special Agents and 56 support positions) to 

increase INS’ intelligence-gathering abilities. ($10 million) 

Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act (VTVPA) Training 

The budget includes $3.7 million to develop and implement a training program for INS 

personnel and agents abroad to assist with identifying, protecting, providing translation services

for, and advancing the rights, benefits and services for victims of severe forms of trafficking and

violence. (3.7 million)

FY 2003 Program Improvements Amount 

($ in millions) 

Joint Terrorism Task Forces 

 48 Special Agents 

 11 Support positions

6.0

International and Domestic Staffing 

 22 Special Agents 

 56 Support positions 

10.0

Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act Training 3.7

Continuation of Emergency Supplemental Activities 21.9

Prepared by the Office of Public Affairs • Immigration & Naturalization Service • (202) 514-2648
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          14,611
<SECURITIES>                                    16,713
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                    53,362
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               233,567
<PP&E>                                         442,894
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,647
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 867,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,078
<BONDS>                                        490,202
<COMMON>                                       213,465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (9,909)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   867,814
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               350,200
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  382,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                24,453
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (75,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (30,066)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,509)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (36,798)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,557)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (86,864)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.56)
        

</TABLE>
52.214-6 Explanation to Prospective Bidders.

As prescribed in 14.201-6(c)(2), insert the following provision:

Explanation to Prospective Bidders (Apr 1984)

Any prospective bidder desiring an explanation or interpretation of the solicitation, drawings,

specifications, etc., must request it in writing soon enough to allow a reply to reach all prospective

bidders before the submission of their bids. Oral explanations or instructions given before the award

of a contract will not be binding. Any information given a prospective bidder concerning a

solicitation will be furnished promptly to all other prospective bidders as an amendment to the

solicitation, if that information is necessary in submitting bids or if the lack of it would be prejudicial

to other prospective bidders.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.214 [Reserved]
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND
      15d-14(b)**




(Section
      906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of The Saint James
      Company. (the "Company") for the nine-month interim period ended September
      30,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, Wanyne Gronquist, President & Chief Executive Officer of
      the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge




(1)
      The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                November 18, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Wayne GronquistWayne
                Gronquist




This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 47

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 64 FR 38108, July 15, 1999.

#### § 47.48 Scope and applicability.

These rules govern the determination of whether a person is responsibly connected with licensees under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930, as amended, or with persons whose license issued under the act has been suspended, revoked, or terminated or with persons who transact business subject to the act, but fail to obtain the required license.

[43 FR 30788, July 18, 1978]
52.228 [Reserved]

52.228-1 Bid Guarantee.

52.228-2 Additional Bond Security.

52.228-3 Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Defense Base Act).

52.228-4 Workers’ Compensation and War-Hazard Insurance Overseas.

52.228-5 Insurance-Work on a Government Installation.

52.228-6 [Reserved]

52.228-7 Insurance-Liability to Third Persons.

52.228-8 Liability and Insurance-Leased Motor Vehicles.

52.228-9 Cargo Insurance.

52.228-10 Vehicular and General Public Liability Insurance.

52.228-11 Individual Surety—Pledge of Assets.

52.228-12 Prospective Subcontractor Requests for Bonds.

52.228-13 Alternative Payment Protections.

52.228-14 Irrevocable Letter of Credit.

52.228-15 Performance and Payment Bonds-Construction.

52.228-16 Performance and Payment Bonds-Other Than Construction.

52.228-17 Individual Surety—Pledge of Assets (Bid Guarantee).

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
#### § 51.1548 Samples for grade and size determination.

Individual samples shall consist of at least 20 pounds. When individual packages contain at least 20 pounds, each individual sample is drawn from one package; when packages contain less than 20 pounds, a sufficient number of adjoining packages are opened to provide at least a 20-pound sample. The number of such individual samples drawn for grade and size determination will vary with the size of the lot.
| **National Center    for     Health Statistics            Division of Data     Services            6525 Belcrest Road     Hyattsville, MD     20782-2003     (301)458-4636      **

 
In 10 seconds,

you will be sent to the    new location for this page.

**http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/r&d/ndi.htm**

Please  update your    bookmarks.

 

This page last reviewed February 29, 2000

**U.S.    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES****Centers    for Disease Control and Prevention**    National Center for Health Statistics    Division of Data Services     Hyattsville, MD    20782-2003    (301) 458-4636
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
PUBLIC LAW 108–391—OCT. 30, 2004 118 STAT. 2243

Public Law 108–391

108th Congress

Joint Resolution

Expressing the sense of the Congress in recognition of the contributions of the

seven Columbia astronauts by supporting establishment of a Columbia Memorial

Space Science Learning Center.

Whereas the crew of the space shuttle Columbia was dedicated

to scientific research and stimulating the interest of American

children in space flight and science;

Whereas the Columbia crew carried out science projects of American

schoolchildren;

Whereas the members of that crew gave their lives trying to benefit

the education of American children;

Whereas a fitting tribute to that effort and to the sacrifice of

the Columbia crew and their families is needed;

Whereas an appropriate form for such tribute would be to expand

educational opportunities in science by the creation of a center

and museum to offer children and teachers activities and information derived from American space research;

Whereas the former manufacturing site of the space shuttles

(including the Columbia and the Challenger) in the City of

Downey, California, is a fitting site for such a tribute;

Whereas residents of Downey are proud of their role in building

the space shuttle fleet and in furthering the Nation’s space program; and

Whereas city officials have been working with NASA representatives to develop the center in Downey: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That it is the

sense of the Congress that—

(1) the space science learning center in Downey, California,

should be designated as the Columbia Memorial Space Science

Learning Center as a living memorial to the seven Columbia

astronauts who died serving their country in the name of

science and research; and

California.

Oct. 30, 2004

[H.J. Res. 57]

118 STAT. 2244 PUBLIC LAW 108–391—OCT. 30, 2004

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 57:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Oct. 5, considered and passed House.

Oct. 10, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

(2) the Federal Government, along with public and private

organizations and persons, should continue to cooperate in the

establishment of such a center.

Approved October 30, 2004.