alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 621.11 Who may obtain assistance.

Assistance is available to conservation districts, communities. county governments, regional planning boards, other planning groups, and State and Federal agencies. Local groups express their desires for a cooperative study to the governor or appropriate State agency.
42.802 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.242-1, Notice of Intent to Disallow Costs, in

solicitations and contracts when a cost-reimbursement contract, a fixed-price incentive contract, or a

contract providing for price redetermination is contemplated.

Parent topic: Subpart 42.8 - Disallowance of Costs
AO 133 (Rev. 9/89) Bill of Costs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

BILL OF COSTS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. Case Number: 3:06-cv-627 

ERICA L. MURPHY, 

 

Judgment having been entered in the above-entitled action on 9/19/06 against Erica L. Murphy Date

the Clerk is requested to tax the following as costs:

Fees of the Clerk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 350.00 

Fees for service of summons and subpoena . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170.10 

Fees of the court reporter for all or any part of the transcript necessarily obtained for use in the case . . . . . 

Fees and disbursements for printing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Fees for witnesses (itemize on reverse side) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Fees for exemplification and copies of papers necessarily obtained for use in this case. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Docket fees under 28 U.S.C. 1923. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.00 

Costs as shown on Mandate of Court of Appeals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Compensation of court-appointed experts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Compensation of interpreters and costs of special interpretation services under 28 U.S.C. 1828 . . . . . . . 

Other costs (please itemize) Application, Notice, Writ of Garnishment, Instructions & Exemptions . . . . . . . $ 

TOTAL $ 540.10 

SPECIAL NOTE: Attach to your bill an itemization and documentation for requested costs in all categories.

DECLARATION

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing costs are correct and were necessarily incurred in this action and that the services for

which fees have been charged were actually and necessarily performed. A copy of this bill was mailed today with postage prepaid to:

 Erica L. Murphy, 1065 Scales Circle, Valley, AL 36854-4610 .

 Signature of Attorney : s/R. Randolph Neeley .

 Name of Attorney: R. Randolph Neeley .

For: The United States of America Date: 9/20/06 . Name of Claiming Party

Costs are taxed in the amount of and included in the judgment.

 By: Clerk of Court Deputy Clerk Date

Case 3:06-cv-00627-WKW-SRW Document 10 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MARK EDWARD COOK,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:21cv109-LC-HTC

JOHN DOE OFFICER

 at WALTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Defendant.

________________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on January 24,

2022 (ECF No. 26). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 26) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal

Case No. 3:21cv109-LC-HTC

Case 3:21-cv-00109-LC-HTC Document 28 Filed 02/28/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1).

3. The clerk of court is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day February of 2022.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:21cv109-LC-HTC

Case 3:21-cv-00109-LC-HTC Document 28 Filed 02/28/22 Page 2 of 2
OAO 187 (Rev. 7/87) Exhibit and Witness List

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEFENDANT CHRISTIAN EXHIBIT

LIST

V.

KOWOSKY TYWAN CHRISTIAN Case Number: 2:06cr169-WKW

 PRESIDING JUDGE GOVERNMENT’S ATTORNEY DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY

SUSAN RUSS WALKER CLARK MORRIS JOSEPH VAN HEEST

 TRIAL DATE (S) COURT REPORTER COURTROOM DEPUTY

MARCH 5, 2007 JOYCE TAYLOR

PLF.

NO.

DEF.

NO.

DATE

OFFERED

MAR KED ADM ITTED DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS* AND WITNESSES

1 3/5/07 Yes Chilton County Bond Records

EXHIBIT IN SEPARATE FOLDER WITH COURT FILE

* Include a notation as to the location of any exhibit not held with the case file or not available because of size.

Page 1 of 1 Pages

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 100-3 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

M ONTGOM ERY, ALABA M A 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HA CKETT 

TELEPHONE: 

 CLERK 

334 954-3600 

March 6, 2007

NOTICE

TO: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD:

You are hereby notified that the jury list and jurors’ profiles for the term of court

beginning March 12, 2007 will be available at 3:30 p.m. on March 9, 2007, in the Jury

Assembly Room (B-108), first floor, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Annex,

One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. The Court instructs counsel that the profiles are

CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS and should be treated as such. The information will now

be provided in electronic media (disc) only. Counsel MUST return ALL discs to the

Courtroom Deputy on the morning of jury selection.

The attached Juror Questionnaire Certification must be signed by counsel of record.

If counsel designates an alternate person to obtain the juror profiles the designee must also

sign the Juror Questionnaire Certification. The Juror Questionnaire Certification must be

submitted to the Jury Administrator/Clerk’s office at the time the juror profiles are obtained.

(This document can be found on our website at www.almd.uscourts.gov).

Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 18 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
§ 760.1202 Eligible producers. ( a ) To be considered an eligible catfish producer, an participant must: ( 1 ) Raise catfish in a controlled environment and be physically located in an eligible county on the beginning date of the disaster period;
( 2 ) Maintain the catfish for commercial use as part of a farming operation;
( 3 ) Have a risk in production of such catfish; and
( 4 ) Have suffered one of the following types of losses relating to catfish feed as a direct result of the county's disaster event that occurred in that year: ( i ) Physical loss of feed that was damaged or destroyed,
( ii ) Cost to the extent allowed by FSA, associated with lost feeding days, or
( iii ) Cost associated with increased feed prices.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 760.803 Eligibility. ( a ) Participants will be eligible to receive disaster benefits under this part only if they incurred qualifying quantity or quality losses for the 2005, 2006, or 2007 crops, as further specified in this part, as a result of damaging weather or any related condition. Participants may not receive benefits with respect to volunteer stands of crops.
( b ) Payments may be made for losses suffered by an eligible participant who, at the time of application, is a deceased individual or is a dissolved entity if a representative, who currently has authority to enter into a contract for the participant, signs the 2005, 2006, or 2007 Crop Disaster Program application. Participants must provide proof of the authority to sign legal documents for the deceased individual or dissolved entity. If a participant is now a dissolved general partnership or joint venture, all members of the general partnership or joint venture at the time of dissolution or their duly authorized representatives must sign the application for payment.
( c ) As a condition to receive benefits under this part, the Participant must have been in compliance with the Highly Erodible Land Conservation and Wetland Conservation provisions of part 12 of this title for the 2005, 2006, or 2007 crop year, as applicable, and must not otherwise be precluded from receiving benefits under parts 12 or 1400 of this title or any law.
52.247-61 F.o.b. Origin-Minimum Size of

Shipments.

As prescribed in 47.305-16(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when volume

rates may apply:

F.o.b. Origin-Minimum Size of Shipments (Apr 1984)

The Contractor agrees that shipment will be made in carload and truckload lots when the quantity to

be delivered to any one destination in any delivery period pursuant to the contract schedule of

deliveries is sufficient to constitute a carload or truckload shipment, except as may otherwise be

permitted or directed in writing by the Contracting Officer. The agreed weight of a carload or

truckload will be the highest applicable minimum weight which will result in the lowest freight rate

(or per car charge) on file or published in common carrier tariffs or tenders as of date of shipment.

In the event the total weight of any scheduled quantity to a destination is less than the highest

carload/truckload minimum weight, the Contractor agrees to ship such scheduled quantity in one

shipment. The Contractor shall be liable to the Government for any increased costs to the

Government resulting from failure to comply with the above requirements. This liability shall not

attach if supplies are outsized or of such nature that they cannot be loaded at the highest minimum

weight bracket.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,481,196
<SECURITIES>                                   990,191
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,471,387
<PP&E>                                      18,688,801
<DEPRECIATION>                               (197,880)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,160,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,874
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,027,314
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,160,188
<SALES>                                        895,048
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               953,877
<CGS>                                           38,060
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               303,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                612,730
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            612,730
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   612,730
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.87
        

</TABLE>
#### § 58.722 Emulsifying agents.

Emulsifying agents shall be those permitted by the Food and Drug Administration for the specific pasteurized process cheese product, and shall be free from extraneous material.
#### WIEBALK, Appellant v. HAVILAND, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Claus H. Wiebalk against Warren Haviland.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
1

 Sentence six permits remand “on motion of the Commissioner of Social Security made for

good cause shown before the Commissioner files the Commissioner’s answer . . . .” 42 U.S.C. §

405(g). See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 100 n. 2 (1991); Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S.

292, 297 n. 2 (1993).

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

STARLEIGH Y. JUDKINS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV625-SRW

) (WO)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This action is presently before the court on the motion to remand filed by the

Commissioner on October 24, 2006 (Doc. # 12). The Commissioner asks that this court

remand this action pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)1

 because the Commissioner

has determined that the tape recording of the August 9, 2005 administrative hearing is blank.

Upon consideration of the motion, it is 

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and this action is REMANDED to the

Commissioner pursuant to sentence six of § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings.

DONE, this 25th day of October, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00625-SRW Document 13 Filed 10/25/06 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

** **

**LONG BEACH SECURITIES CORP. **

**RESTATED OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Douglas A. Potolsky, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to befiled in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10–K of Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-9 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain anyuntrue statement of a  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to beprovided under Form 10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with Servicing Criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with Servicing Criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Deutsche BankNational Trust Company.

 

 

 

Date:  As of March 15,2007

|   |   | /s/ Doug Potolsky                                                                            |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  DougPotolsky                                                                     |
|   |   | Title:   President and Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor |
§ 763.3 Full faith and credit. ( a ) The land contract guarantee constitutes an obligation supported by the full faith and credit of the United States. The Agency may contest the guarantee only in cases of fraud or misrepresentation by the seller, in which: ( 1 ) The seller had actual knowledge of the fraud or misrepresentation at the time it because the seller, or
( 2 ) The seller participated in or condoned the fraud or misrepresentation.
( b ) Loss claims also may be reduced or denied to the extent that any negligence contributed to the loss under § 763.22.
Part 224 - PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

Subpart 224.1 - PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY

224.103 Procedures.

Subpart 224.2 - FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

224.203 Policy.

Parent topic: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

Subpart 224.1 - PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY

224.103 Procedures.

(b)(2) DoD rules and regulations are contained in DoDI 5400.11, DoD Privacy and Civil Liberties

Programs; DoD 5400.11-R, Department of Defense Privacy Program; and DoDM 5400.11, DoD

Privacy and Civil Liberties Programs: Breach Preparedness and Response Plan.

Subpart 224.2 - FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

224.203 Policy.

(a) DoD implementation is in DoDD 5400.7, DoD Freedom of Information Act Program, and DoD

5400.7-R, DoD Freedom of Information Act Program.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Zogenix, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ann D. Rhoads, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 4, 2011 |  | /s/ Ann D. Rhoads      
|                    |  | Ann D. Rhoads          
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2:06CV642 BROWN

STRICKEN AS AN ERRONEOUS DOCKET 

ENTRY. DISREGARD.

Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 13-2 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.159 Related official records. ( a ) *Volume of work report.* Field offices and agencies shall prepare periodic reports showing the kind and the volume of inspection and weighing services that they performed. The report shall be prepared and copies shall be submitted to the Service according to the instructions.
( b ) *Record of withdrawals and dismissals.* Field offices and agencies shall maintain a complete record of requests for official inspection or weighing services that are withdrawn by the applicant or that are conditionally withheld or dismissed. The record shall be prepared and maintained according to the instructions.
( c ) *Licensee record.* Licensees, including licensed warehouse samplers, shall ( 1 ) keep the license issued to them by the Service and
( 2 ) keep or have reasonable access to a complete record of the Act, the standards, the regulations, and the instructions.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0011)
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2445 

To permit certain school districts in Illinois to be reconstituted for purposes 

of determining assistance under the Impact Aid program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16 (legislative day, MARCH 15), 2006 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. OBAMA) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To permit certain school districts in Illinois to be reconstituted for purposes of determining assistance under the 

Impact Aid program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR IMPACT AID PAYMENT. 

4 (a) LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES.—Notwith5 standing section 8013(9)(B) of the Elementary and Sec6 ondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)(B)), 

7 North Chicago Community Unit School District 187, 

8 North Shore District 112, and Township High School Dis9 trict 113 in Lake County, Illinois, and Glenview Public 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2445 IS

1 School District 34 and Glenbrook High School District 

2 225 in Cook County, Illinois, shall be considered local edu3 cational agencies as such term is used in and for purposes 

4 of title VIII of such Act. 

5 (b) COMPUTATION.—Notwithstanding any other pro6 vision of law, federally connected children (as determined 

7 under section 8003(a) of the Elementary and Secondary 

8 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7703(a))) who are in 

9 attendance in the North Shore District 112, Township 

10 High School District 113, Glenview Public School District 

11 34, and Glenbrook High School District 225 described in 

12 subsection (a), shall be considered to be in attendance in 

13 the North Chicago Community Unit School District 187 

14 described in subsection (a) for purposes of computing the 

15 amount that the North Chicago Community Unit School 

16 District 187 is eligible to receive under subsection (b) or 

17 (d) of such section if— 

18 (1) such school districts have entered into an 

19 agreement for such students to be so considered and 

20 for the equitable apportionment among all such 

21 school districts of any amount received by the North 

22 Chicago Community Unit School District 187 under 

23 such section; and 

24 (2) any amount apportioned among all such 

25 school districts pursuant to paragraph (1) is used by 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•S 2445 IS

1 such school districts only for the direct provision of 

2 educational services. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS