alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08187

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 08187\08187_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08187\08187_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

08187\08187_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08187\08187_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

08187\Certification Statement Plant ID 08187.pdf Plant certification statement

08187\Supplemental Documents\08187_Wright Letter September 14.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08187\Supplemental Documents\Certification Statement Plant ID 08187.jpg Plant certification statement

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
§ 51.2109 U.S. Standard Sheller Run. “U.S. Standard Sheller Run” consists of shelled almonds of similar varietal characteristics which are whole, clean and well dried, and which are free from decay, rancidity, insect injury, foreign material, doubles, split or broken kernels, particles and dust, and free from damage caused by chipped and scratched kernels, mold, gum, shriveling, brown spot or other means. (See §§ 51.2113 and 51.2114.) In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, the following tolerances, by weight, shall be permitted: ( a ) *For dissimilar varieties.* 5 percent, including not more than one-fifth of this amount, or 1 percent, for bitter almonds mixed with sweet almonds;
( b ) *For doubles.* 25 percent;
( c ) *For kernels damaged by chipping and/or scratching or split and broken.* 35 percent; Provided, that not more than three-sevenths of this amount, or 15 percent, shall be allowed for split and broken: And Provided Further, that not more than one-third of this latter amount, or 5 percent, shall be allowed for pieces which will pass through a round opening 20 ⁄ 64 inch (7.9 mm) in diameter;
( d ) *For foreign material.* Two-tenths of 1 percent (0.20 percent). No part of this percentage shall be allowed for glass and metal;
( e ) *For particles and dust.* One-tenth of 1 percent (0.10 percent); and,
( f ) *For other defects.* 3 percent, including not more than two-thirds of this amount, or 2 percent, for serious damage.
52.223-19 Compliance with Environmental

Management Systems.

As prescribed in 23.903 , insert the following clause:

Compliance with Environmental Management Systems (May 2011)

The Contractor’s work under this contract shall conform with all operational controls identified in

the applicable agency or facility Environmental Management Systems and provide monitoring and

measurement information necessary for the Government to address environmental performance

relative to the goals of the Environmental Management Systems.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.223 [Reserved]
52.215-4 [Reserved]

Parent topic: 52.215 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<CAPTION>
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                      25,165
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          25
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    699
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      89,205
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        88,476
<LOANS>                                    418,757
<ALLOWANCE>                                  4,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             556,527
<DEPOSITS>                                 480,973
<SHORT-TERM>                                27,545
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,644
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,234
<COMMON>                                     8,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,201
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             556,527
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,390
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,025
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,417
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,682
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             413
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,332
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  250
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                842
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     612
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   612
<EPS-BASIC>                                   3.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 3.84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                7.71
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,739
<LOANS-PAST>                                   329
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             4,136
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  186
<RECOVERIES>                                   139
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            4,339
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         4,339
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0




</TABLE>
§ 58.521 Pasteurization and product flow. ( a ) The skim milk used for the manufacture of cottage cheese shall be pasteurized not more than 24 hours prior to the time of setting by heating every particle of skim milk to a temperature of 161 °F. for not less than 15 seconds or by any other combination of temperature and time giving equivalent results. All skim milk must be cooled promptly to setting temperature. If held more than two hours between pasteurization and time of setting, the skim milk shall be cooled and held at 45 °F. or lower until set.
( b ) Cream or cheese dressing shall be pasteurized at not less than 150 °F. for not less than 30 minutes or at not less than 166 °F. for not less than 15 seconds or by any other combination of temperature and time treatment giving equivalent results. Cream and cheese dressing shall be cooled promptly to 40 °F. or lower after pasteurization to aid in further cooling of cottage cheese curd for improved keeping quality.
( c ) Reconstituted nonfat dry milk for cottage cheese manufacture need not be re-pasteurized provided it is reconstituted within two hours prior to the time of setting using water which is free from viable pathogenic or otherwise harmful microorganisms as well as microorganisms which may cause spoilage of cottage cheese. Skim milk separated from pasteurized whole milk need not be re-pasteurized provided it is separated in equipment from which all traces of raw milk from previous operations have been removed by proper cleaning and sanitizing.
#### § 600.9 Major land resource area soil survey offices.

The United States is divided into 17 major land resource areas (MLRA) for the purpose of soil survey production. Major land resource area soil survey offices (MO) provide the technical leadership, coordination, and quality assurance for all soil survey project activities within the respective MLRA. Each MO serves two or more States (except for the MO in Alaska), and is under the jurisdiction of the State conservationist where the office is located. Each MO is directed and supervised by a leader who is designated by the State conservationist.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Shelter Properties VII Limited Partnership;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 13, 2007



/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters

Vice President of Shelter Realty VII Corporation, equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership
#### Deward Damon et al., Appellants, v. Kraft Foods Division, National Dairy Products Corp., Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without

costs. Memorandum: Special Term correctly determined that the marketing agreements between the parties were not contrary to law and properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. Inasmuch as the terms and conditions of the marketing agreements complied in all respects with the applicable provisions of the New York State Agriculture and Markets Law, it was unnecessary for Special Term to consider whether this was a class action or whether the contracts were co-operative marketing agreements. In affirming the validity of the agreements we do not reach or pass upon these questions. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term granting motion for summary judgment in declaratory judgment action.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Yecchio, Witmer, Gabrielli and Bastow, JJ.
§ 623.9 Easement priority. The State Conservationist, in consultation with the FWS and with input from a technical committee and other interested Federal agencies, will establish a ranking process to establish the priority of parcels offered into the EWRP. This process will rank the floodway enhancement and environmental benefits per dollar of government expenditure on restoration and easement purchase. The factors for determining the priority for selection will consider the following: ( a ) Protection and enhancement of habitat for migratory birds and wildlife, including the contribution the restoration may make to the recovery of threatened and endangered species,
( b ) Floodway expansion,
( c ) Proximity to other protected wetlands,
( d ) Level of hydrology restored,
( e ) Wetland function or values,
( f ) Likelihood of successful restoration of wetland values,
( g ) Cost of restoration and easement purchase, and
( h ) Other factors as determined appropriate by NRCS.
(September 25, 1980)

#### Public Service Mutual Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Norman Landsberg and Another, Doing Business as Diane Realty, Appellant, v Philco Ford Corporation, Respondent. Sam Goldstein, Plaintiff, v Norman Landsberg, Doing Business as Diane Realty Co., Appellant, and Aeronutronic Ford Corp., Now Known as Ford Aerospace and Communications Corp., Respondent.

Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 10, 1979, unanimously affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellants $75 costs and disbursements of this- appeal. Appeal from order of said court, entered on February 7, 1980, unanimously dismissed as nonappealable, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Birns, J. P., Sandler, Silverman, Bloom and Lynch, JJ.
36.510 Operations and storage areas.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-10, Operations and Storage Areas, in

solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract or a fixed-price dismantling,

demolition, or removal of improvements contract is contemplated and the contract amount is

expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. The contracting officer may insert the clause

in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction or a fixed-price contract for

dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements is contemplated and the contract amount is

expected to be at or below the simplified acquisition threshold.

Parent topic: Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
#### § 70.76 [Reserved]
#### Melanie L. McCulley et al., Appellants, v Scott C. Sandwick, Respondent.

Submitted November 5, 2007;

decided November 19, 2007

Reported below, 43 AD3d 624.

Appeal, insofar as taken from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellants’ CPLR 4404 postjudgment motion, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent is not on a question of law *(see*CPLR 5601 [a]; Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 14:3, at 501 [rev 3d ed]).
§ 760.1600 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart specifies the terms and conditions for the On-Farm Storage Loss Program. The On-Farm Storage Loss Program will provide payments to eligible producers who suffered uncompensated losses of harvested commodities stored in on farm structures as a result from hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, typhoons, volcanic activity, snowstorms, and wildfires that occurred in the 2018 and 2019 calendar years.
( b ) The regulations in this subpart are applicable to crops of barley, small and large chickpeas, corn, grain sorghum, lentils, oats, dry peas, peanuts, rice, wheat, soybeans, oilseeds, hay and other crops designated by Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) stored in on-farm structures. These regulations specify the general provisions under which the On-Farm Storage Loss Program will be administered by CCC. In any case in which money must be refunded to CCC in connection with this part, interest will be due to run from the date of disbursement of the sum to be refunded. This provision will apply, unless waived by the Deputy Administrator, irrespective of any other rule.
( c ) Eligible on-farm structures include all on-farm structures deemed acceptable by the Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs.
( d ) Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) and payment limitation provisions specified in part 760.1607 of this chapter apply to this subpart.
§ 760.706 Availability of funds. ( a ) Payments specified in this subpart are subject to the availability of funds. The total available program funds are $550 million. In order to keep payments within available funds, the Deputy Administrator may pro-rate payments, to the extent the Deputy Administrator determines that necessary.
( b ) Funds for CAP are being made available only for the 2009 crop year reported and determined eligible crop acreage in disaster counties as reflected on a form FSA-578, Report of Acreage, as of October 22, 2010.
#### Christopher RADKE, Petitioner-Appellant v. Nathaniel QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-11106

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 23, 2007.

Christopher Radke, Gatesville, TX, pro se.

S. Michael Bozarth, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner-Appellant Christopher Radke, Texas prisoner # 806352, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application challenging his conviction of murder. The district court dismissed the application as time-barred. We granted a certificate of appealability (COA) on the issue whether “the limitations period should have been equitably tolled because Radke did not receive timely notice of the denial of his state habeas application.”

Radke argues on appeal that he is entitled to equitable tolling because (1) he did not receive notice of the denial of his state habeas application until 37 days after the denial, and (2) the district court erred in not considering his objections concerning equitable tolling.

As Radke’s petition is time-barred irrespective of the applicability of the doctrine of equitable tolling to his case, we need not *270reach the question for which the COA was granted. Radke’s conviction became final on February 22, 2000, 90 days after his petition for discretionary review was denied on November 24, 1999. *See*Sup.Ct. R. 13. The one-year limitations period thus expired in February 2001, more than five months before Radke filed his state habeas application on August 6, 2001, and more than 20 months before he filed his § 2254 application on November 2, 2002. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). As the statute of limitations expired before Radke filed his state habeas application, the issue whether he should receive equitable tolling because of his failure to receive timely notice of the denial of his state habeas application is irrelevant. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# L_2014034EN.01000401.xml

| 5.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 34/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 34/4

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 102/2014

of 4 February 2014

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 of 29 April 2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia (1), and in particular Article 11(a) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 lists the natural and legal persons, bodies and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 lists the natural and legal persons, bodies and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 23 December 2013, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council established pursuant to resolution 1521 (2003) concerning Liberia decided to remove one person from the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 23 December 2013, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council established pursuant to resolution 1521 (2003) concerning Liberia decided to remove one person from the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.

| (3) | Annex I should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.

Done at Brussels, 4 February 2014.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

the Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments

---

(1)  
  OJ L 162, 30.4.2004, p. 32.

1

---

ANNEX

Annex I to Regulation (EC) 872/2004 is amended as follows:

The following entry is deleted:

‘Benoni Urey. Date of birth: 22.6.1957. Passports: (a) Liberian diplomatic passport: D-00148399, (b) Commissioner of Maritime Passport: D/002356. Other information: former Commissioner of Maritime Affairs of Liberia.’

---
#### § 58.720 Acidifying agents.

Acidifying agents if used shall be those permitted by the Food and Drug Administration for the specific pasteurized process cheese product.
#### § 52.805 Ascertaining the rating for each factor.

The essential variations within each factor are so described that the value may be ascertained for each factor and expressed numerically. The numerical range for the rating of each factor is inclusive (for example, “27 to 30 points” means 27, 28, 29 or 30 points).
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”) of MSB Financial Corp. (the “Corporation”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Michael A. Shriner, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffrey E. Smith, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





/s/  Michael A. Shriner

/s/ Jeffrey E. SmithMichael A. Shriner

Jeffrey E. SmithPresident and CEO

Vice President and CFOSeptember 28, 2012

September 28, 2012