alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2899 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2899

 To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on reaction products of 
       phosphorus trichloride with 1,1'-biphenyl and 2,4-bis(1,1-
                         dimethylethyl)phenol).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on reaction products of 
       phosphorus trichloride with 1,1'-biphenyl and 2,4-bis(1,1-
                         dimethylethyl)phenol).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REACTION PRODUCTS OF PHOSPHORUS TRICHLORIDE WITH 1,1'-
              BIPHENYL AND 2,4-BIS(1,1-DIMETHYLETHYL)PHENOL).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.04.07 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to reaction products of 
phosphorus trichloride with 1,1'-biphenyl and 2,4-bis(1,1-
dimethylethyl)phenol) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:06-cv-00617-MEF-CSC Document 7 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00617-MEF-CSC Document 7 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
exhibit10f.htm


     

    John
G. Harp 2009 Additional Incentive Opportunity

    


    


    Mr. Harp
was given an additional 2009 incentive opportunity.  If MDU
Construction Services Group, Inc.'s 2009 actual return on invested capital
exceeds its 2009 weighted average cost of capital by 100 to 199 basis points,
Mr. Harp will receive $100,000; if it exceeds 2009 weighted average cost of
capital by 200 or more basis points, Mr. Harp will receive an additional
$100,000, for a total of $200,000.  If MDU Construction Services
Group, Inc.'s 2009 actual return on invested capital is less than 100 basis
points above its 2009 weighted average cost of capital, Mr. Harp will not be
eligible to receive any amount under this incentive opportunity.

    


    The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of MDU Resources Group, Inc.
shall determine whether or not the goal has been met and recommend to the Board
of Directors of MDU Resources Group, Inc. (the "Board") whether or not to
approve payment of the additional incentive opportunity to Mr.
Harp.  If the Board approves payment of the additional incentive
opportunity, payment will be made in cash between January 1, 2010 and March 10,
2010.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency
 AGENCY: Farm Service Agency, USDA.
 ACTION: Notice of public meeting; correction.
 SUMMARY: The Farm Service Agency published a document in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         on November 26, 2010, announcing two public meetings of the Dairy Industry Advisory Committee. The location of the December and January meetings have changed. This notice provides the current meeting location information.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Solomon Whitfield, Designated Federal Official; phone: (202) 720-9886; e-mail: 
                        *solomon.whitfield@wdc.usda.gov.*
                         Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication (Braille, large print, audio tape, etc.) should contact the USDA Target Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     of November 26, 2010, on page 72786, in the table, the location for the meeting on December 16, 2010, and the meeting on January 11 and 12, 2011, should be USDA headquarters, in the Jamie L Whitten Building, Room 104-A, 12th Street and Jefferson Drive, SW., Washington, DC 20250. The meeting locations for December 14 and 15, 2010, remains the same as published on November 26, 2010, (75 FR 72785-72786). The meeting times and all other information remains the same as initially published. For clarity, the Dairy Committee will hold the meetings on the following dates and locations: Date
Time
LocationDecember 14, 2010
1 p.m.-5 p.m.
USDA headquarters, in the South Building, Room 3074, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250.December 15, 2010
8 a.m.-noon.
USDA headquarters, in the South Building, Room 3074, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250.December 16, 2010
8 a.m.-5 p.m.
USDA headquarters, in the Jamie L. Whitten Building, Room 104-A, 12th Street and Jefferson Drive, SW., Washington, DC 20250.January 11 and 12, 2011
8 a.m.-5 p.m.
USDA headquarters, in the Jamie L. Whitten Building, Room 104-A, 12th Street and Jefferson Drive, SW., Washington, DC 20250.
 
 
 Notice of these meetings is provided in accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2). Signed in Washington, DC on December 1, 2010. R. T. Valentine, Acting Administrator, Farm Service Agency.


[FR Doc. 2010-30646 Filed 12-6-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 24 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 24 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 24 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6286

DAVID S. ADAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, NOTTOWAY CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-95-866)

Submitted: September 17, 1996 Decided: October 9, 1996

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David S. Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr.,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994),

amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to

the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny

such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. Adams v. Warden, No. CA-95-866 (W.D. Va. Feb. 15,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3091]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Workforce Investment Act; Native American Employment and Training 
Council

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of 
Labor.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and Section 166(h)(4) of the 
Workforce Investment Act (WIA) [29 U.S.C. 2911(h)(4)], notice is hereby 
given of the next meeting of the Native American Employment and 
Training Council (Council), as constituted under WIA.

DATES: The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. (Eastern Time) on Wednesday, 
March 3, 2010, and continue until 5 p.m. that day. The meeting will 
reconvene at 9 a.m. on Thursday, March 4, 2010, and adjourn at 5 p.m. 
that day. The period from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. on March 4, 2010, will be 
reserved for participation and presentations by members of the public.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the U.S. Department of Labor 
(DOL), Frances Perkins Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room S-
2322, Washington, DC 20210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public. 
Members of the public not present may submit a written statement on or 
before February 23, 2010, to be included in the record of the meeting. 
Statements are to be submitted to Mrs. Evangeline M. Campbell, 
Designated Federal Official (DFO), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room S-4209, Washington, DC 20210. Persons 
who need special accommodations should contact Mr. Craig Lewis at (202) 
693-3384, at least two business days before the meeting. The formal 
agenda will focus on the following topics: (1) DOL, Employment and 
Training Administration Assistant Secretary's Update; (2) DOL, Office 
of Workforce Investment Administrator's Update; (3) DOL PY 2010-PY 2011 
Strategic Planning; (4) Reauthorization of WIA; (5) DOL, Indian and 
Native American Program Update; (6) Training and Technical Assistance; 
(7) 2010 Census; (8) Council Update; (9) Council Workgroup Reports; and 
(10) Council Recommendations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Evangeline M. Campbell, DFO, 
Indian and Native American Program, Employment and Training 
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-4209, 200 Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Telephone number (202) 693-3737 
(VOICE) (this is not a toll-free number).

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of February 2010.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-3091 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FR-P\
# 32.1109 EFT information submitted by offerors.

If *offerors* are required to submit EFT information prior to award, the successful *offeror* is not responsible for resubmitting this information after award of the contract except to make changes, or to place the information on *invoices* if required by agency procedures. Therefore, *contracting officers**shall* forward EFT information provided by the successful *offeror* to the appropriate office.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 32.11 - Electronic Funds Transfer
§ 773.19 Interest rate, terms, security requirements, and repayment. ( a ) *Interest rate.* The interest rate will be fixed for the term of the loan. The rate will be established by the Agency and available in each Agency Office, based upon the cost of Government borrowing for loans of similar maturities.
( b ) *Terms.* The loan term will be for up to 3 years, based upon the useful life of the security offered.
( c ) *Security requirements.* The Agency will take a lien on the following security, if available, as necessary to adequately secure the loan: ( 1 ) Real estate;
( 2 ) Chattels;
( 3 ) Crops;
( 4 ) Other assets owned by the applicant; and
( 5 ) Assets owned and pledged by a third party.
( d ) *Documentation of security value.* ( 1 ) For loans that are for $30,000 or less, collateral value will be based on the best available, verifiable information.
( 2 ) For loans of greater than $30,000 where the applicant's balance sheet shows a net worth of three times the loan amount or greater, collateral value will be based on tax assessment of real estate and depreciation schedules of chattels, as applicable, less any existing liens.
( 3 ) For loans of greater than $30,000 where the applicant's balance sheet shows a net worth of less than three times the loan amount, collateral value will be based on an appraisal. Such appraisals must be obtained by the applicant, at the applicant's expense and acceptable to the Agency. Appraisals of real estate must be completed in accordance with USPAP.
( e ) *Repayment.* ( 1 ) All loan applicants must demonstrate that the loan can be repaid.
( 2 ) For loans that are for $30,000 or less where the applicant's balance sheet shows a net worth of three times the loan amount or greater, repayment ability will be considered adequate without further documentation.
( 3 ) For loans that are for $30,000 or less where the applicant's balance sheet shows a net worth of less than three times the loan amount, repayment ability must be demonstrated using the farm's operating plan, including a projected cash flow budget based on historical performance. Such operating plan is required notwithstanding § 773.18 of this part.
( 4 ) For loans that are for more than $30,000, repayment ability must be demonstrated using the farm's operating plan, including a projected cash flow budget based on historical performance.
( f ) *Creditworthiness.* All loan applicants must have an acceptable credit history demonstrated by debt repayment. A history of failure to repay past debts as they came due (including debts to the Internal Revenue Service) when the ability to repay was within their control will demonstrate unacceptable credit history. Unacceptable credit history will not include isolated instances of late payments which do not represent a pattern and were clearly beyond the applicant's control or lack of credit history.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20326

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TONY CHARLES RICHARD,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-00-CR-785-1)

- - - - - - - - - -

January 4, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Tony Charles Richard appeals his sentence,

following a guilty plea, for two counts of unauthorized use of an

access device, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a). Richard

contends that the district court erred in departing upwardly under

the Sentencing Guidelines and imposing a prison term of 54 months,

when the Probation Office had calculated a guideline imprisonment

range of 30 to 37 months.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in upwardly

departing from the applicable guideline range. United States v.
2

Ashburn, 38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc). In concluding

that Richard’s criminal history category did not adequately reflect

the seriousness of his past criminal conduct, the court was

entitled to rely on Richard’s prior arrests for unadjudicated

offenses, as detailed in Richard’s Presentence Report (“PSR”).

See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3. Relying on PSR information that Richard has

not shown to be “materially untrue,” the court determined that

Richard had attempted to avoid prosecution for these acts.

See United States v. Shipley, 963 F.2d 56, 59 (5th Cir. 1992);

U.S.S.G. § 6A1.3. The court also concluded that recidivism was

likely, based on Richard’s having been charged with and convicted

of repeated offenses involving currency theft and credit cards,

offenses that are similar to his crimes of conviction in the

instant case. See United States v. Harrington, 114 F.3d 517, 519-

20 (5th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
§ 765.406 Release of transferor from liability. ( a ) *General.* Agency approval of an assumption does not automatically release the transferor from liability.
( b ) *Requirements for release.* ( 1 ) The Agency may release the transferor from liability when all of the security is transferred and the total outstanding debt is assumed.
( 2 ) If an outstanding debt balance will remain and only part of the transferor's Agency security is transferred, the written request for release of liability will not be approved, unless the deficiency is otherwise resolved to the Agency's satisfaction.
( 3 ) If an outstanding balance will remain and all of the transferor's security has been transferred, the transferor may pay the remaining balance or request debt settlement in accordance with part 761 subpart F of this chapter. If the transferor does not resolve the debt by paying the remaining balance or submitting a debt settlement offer that is acceptable to the Agency, the Agency will service the debt in accordance with part 3 of this title using all applicable collection tools including, but not limited to, administrative offset, AWG, cross-servicing, Federal salary offset, and TOP.
( 4 ) Except for loans in default being serviced under 7 CFR part 766, if an individual who is jointly liable for repayment of an FLP loan withdraws from the farming operation and conveys all of their interest in the security to the remaining borrower, the withdrawing party may be released from liability under the following conditions: ( i ) A divorce decree or property settlement states that the withdrawing party is no longer responsible for repaying the loan;
( ii ) All of the withdrawing party's interests in the security are conveyed to the persons with whom the loan will be continued; and
( iii ) The persons with whom the loan will be continued can demonstrate the ability to repay all of the existing and proposed debt obligations.
[72 FR 63309, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 85 FR 36693, June 17, 2020]
#### § 760.1708 Application for payments for milk loss.

The affected farmer or the affected farmer's legal representative must sign and file an application for payment on a form which is approved for that purpose by the Deputy Administrator. The form must be filed with the county FSA office for the county where the farm headquarters are located no later than close of business of the designated deadline announced by the Secretary for 2020, 2021, and 2022 losses.

[88 FR 62291, Sept. 11, 2023]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30634]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Sunshine Act; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).

Date and Time: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
December 9, 2010, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes 
its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed 
to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board 
meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in 
advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

    <bullet> November 10, 2010.

B. New Business

    <bullet> Proposed Bookletter--Farm Credit System Investment Asset 
Management.

C. Reports

    <bullet> Farmland Values and Collateral Risk Guidance.

Closed Session*

Reports

    <bullet> Office of Secondary Market Oversight Quarterly Report.

*Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9).

    Dated: December 2, 2010.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-30634 Filed 12-2-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
## Appendix C: Estimation of Upper-bound Aquatic Exposure

GENEEC2 input parameters for Ro zol Prairie Dog Bait application Property Value Source Comment Solubility 34 ppm 1998 RED Hydrolysis Stable MRID 42205501 At pH 5, 7, and 9 Photolysis in Water 90 min (half-life) MRID 42205502 Photodegradation on Soil 4 days (half-life) MRID 42452301

Aerobic Soil Degradation 65 days (half-life) MRID 43159801 Calculated using input parameter guidance (EPA 2009) K ads 126 ml/g MRID 42666001 Determined using input parameter guidance (EPA 2009) K oc 35,400 ml/g MRID 42666001 Determined using input parameter guidance (EPA 2009) Vapor pressure 3.6 * 10 -8 mm Hg 1998 RED Henry’s law 5.2 * 10 -8 atmm 3 /mol 1998 RED

K ow 94 1998 RED Incorporation depth 4 inches Label Label requires 6 inches, adjusted to 4 inches to account for bioturbation Application rate 0.00058 lbs a.i./A Label Number of applications 2 Label

Application interval 21 days Label Not specified- likely minimum interval deduced from label

Modeling results:

RUN No. 1 FOR chlorophacinone ON btpd * INPUT VALUES *

-------------------------------------------------------------------- RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE NO-SPRAY INCORP ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) (FT) (IN)

-------------------------------------------------------------------- .001( .001) 2 21 35400.0 34.0 GRANUL( .0) .0 4.0

FIELD AND STANDARD POND HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)-------------------------------------------------------------------- METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED (FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (POND) (POND-EFF) (POND) (POND)

-------------------------------------------------------------------- 65.00 2 N/A .06- 7.75 130.00 7.31

GENERIC EECs (IN NANOGRAMS/LITER (PPTr)) Version 2.0 Aug 1, 2001

-------------------------------------------------------------------- PEAK MAX 4 DAY MAX 21 DAY MAX 60 DAY MAX 90 DAY GEEC AVG GEEC AVG GEEC AVG GEEC AVG GEEC

-------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.00 .84 .37 .14 .09
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. CASE NO.: 1:04-cr-1-SPM-AK

RONALD RYAN SHEPARD, JR.,

Defendant

___________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 161). Petitioner has been furnished a copy and has

been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the

Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 161) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s Amended Motion to Vacate (doc. 146) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-eighth day of August, 2009.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge