alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

Application of )

)

Caribbean Airlines Limited )

) Docket DOT

‐ OST

‐ 2013

‐ 0140

For an Exemption From 49 U.S.C. §41301 )

(JFK

‐ Georgetown

‐ JFK) )

)

Application of )

)

Fly Jamaica Airways Limited ) Docket DOT

‐ OST

‐ 2013

‐ 0136

)

To Engage in Scheduled Combination )

Service Between the U.S. and Guyana )

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §40109 )

__________________________________________)

AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION’S NOTICE OF SERVICE

David M. Semanchik

Air Line Pilots Association

535 Herndon Parkway

Herndon, VA 20170

Phone: 703

‐ 481

‐ 2421

Fax: 703

‐ 481

‐ 2478

David.Semanchik@alpa.org

Attorney for Air Line Pilots Association

August 8, 20132 BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

Application of )

)

Caribbean Airlines Limited )

) Docket DOT

‐ OST

‐ 2013

‐ 0140

For an Exemption From 49 U.S.C. §41301 )

(JFK

‐ Georgetown

‐ JFK) )

)

Application of )

)

Fly Jamaica Airways Limited ) Docket DOT

‐ OST

‐ 2013

‐ 0136

)

To Engage in Scheduled Combination )

Service Between the U.S. and Guyana )

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §40109 )

__________________________________________)

AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION’S NOTICE OF SERVICE

The Air Line Pilots Association (“ALPA”) regrets that it inadvertently did not

serve its Answer, filed on July 31, 2013, upon applicants Fly Jamaica Airways Limited

and Caribbean Airlines Limited. Please take notice that ALPA served its Answer upon

those applicants on this day, August 8, 2013, as follows:

(By first

‐ class mail)

Capt. Paul Ronald Reece

Chairman & Managing Director

Fly Jamaica Airways Limited

2 Holborn Road

Kingston 10

Jamaica, W.I.3 (By email)

Pierre Murphy

Law Offices of Pierre Murphy

1200 New Hampshire Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20036

Email: pmurphy@lopmurphy.com

Counsel for Fly Jamaica Airways Limited

(By email)

John Maggio

Condon & Forsyth LLP

7 Times Square

New York, NY 10036

Email: jmaggio@condonlaw.com

Counsel for Caribbean Airlines Limited

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________________________

David M. Semanchik

Air Line Pilots Association

535 Herndon Parkway

Herndon, VA 20170

Phone: 703

‐ 481

‐ 2421

Fax: 703

‐ 481

‐ 2478

David.Semanchik@alpa.org

Attorney for Air Line Pilots Association

August 8, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000760327
<NAME> LOGAN COUNTY BANKSHARES, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,023
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,860
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     16,937
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,060
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,090
<LOANS>                                         82,515
<ALLOWANCE>                                        595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,338
<DEPOSITS>                                     106,154
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                675
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,274
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 119,338
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,963
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,080
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   349
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,392
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,631
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,631
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,761
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,243
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,243
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,490
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4.527
<LOANS-NON>                                        550
<LOANS-PAST>                                       254
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   681
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      117
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  595
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               595
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
§ 765.401 Conditions for transfer of real estate and chattel security. ( a ) *General conditions.* ( 1 ) Approval of a security transfer and corresponding loan assumption obligates a new borrower to repay an existing FLP debt.
( 2 ) All transferees will become personally liable for the debt and assume the full responsibilities and obligations of the debt transferred when the transfer and assumption is complete. If the transferee is an entity, the entity and each entity member must assume personal liability for the loan.
( 3 ) A transfer and assumption will only be approved if the Agency determines it is in the Agency's financial interest.
( b ) *Agency consent.* A borrower must request and obtain written Agency consent prior to selling or transferring security to another party.
[72 FR 63309, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 79 FR 60745, Oct. 8, 2014]
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Citizenship EducationJuvenile JusticeLaw Related EducationResponsibilitySecondary EducationSentencingSocial StudiesVictims of Crime

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### §§ 701.3-701.12 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:04-cr-0001-SPM-AK

RONALD RYAN SHEPARD,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc.143, Motion for Leave to Amend Motion to

Vacate, by Ronald Ryan Shepard. Defendant did not, however, file the proposed amended

motion to vacate as required by the local rules of this Court. See N.D. Fla. R. 15.1. Until the

proposed amendment is filed, the Government cannot fashion a response as to whether

amendment is appropriate under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

That, no later than February 1, 2008, Defendant shall file his proposed amended motion

to vacate;

That, within 14 days after the proposed amended motion to vacate is filed, the

Government shall file a response to the motion for leave to amend.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of January, 2008.

s/ A. KORNBLUM ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cr-00001-SPM-AK Document 145 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eye Care centers of America, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. McComas, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |                                     
|----------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|November 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    DAVID E.
MCCOMAS             
|                  |  |  |  | David E. McComas                    
|                  |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN
STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
IN THE UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

JURY SELECTION AND TRIAL

MARCH 12, 2007 AT 10:00 A.M.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SUSAN RUSS WALKER

USA vs. Carrie J. Flowers

2:06cr178-SRW

_____________________________ ______________________________

Aaron Drake, SAUSA - Government Ronald Wayne Wise - Defendant

Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 18-3 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         103,036
<SECURITIES>                                   190,380
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,224
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               386,840
<PP&E>                                       8,615,249
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,244,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,864,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,251,770
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,864,107
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,167,711
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  701,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             425,669
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,561
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Thompson, Appellant.

by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 10, 1979, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts), criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. Due to several errors committed at trial, the defendant was deprived of a fair trial. The indictment stems from five alleged narcotics sales made by defendant, a police officer, to another police officer who had agreed to participate in an investigation of narcotics involvement by members of the police department. At trial, on redirect examination of the "cooperating” police officer, the prosecutor was permitted, over objection, to question this main witness about his Grand Jury testimony against other police officers involved in narcotics transactions, including the disposition of those cases. It was clearly error to permit the witness to testify as to these separate and extraneous crimes, committed by one other than the accused. (See *People v Roland,*40 AD2d 1007.) This error was compounded by the prosecutor’s remarks on summation as he again referred to the testimony concerning the cases of the other police officers. (See *People v Perez,*69 AD2d 891, 892.) In addition, the court struck the entire testimony of one character witness. This, too, was error because good reputation may be shown by negative evidence. *(People v Van Gaasbeck,*189 NY 408, 419-420; cf. *People v Pryor,*70 AD2d 805.) Lastly, it was error for the prosecutor to refer to character witnesses who could have been called by defendant. It is clear that a defendant does not have a duty to call any witnesses. (See *People v Figueroa,*38 AD2d 595.) This court concludes that the cumulative effect of these errors deprived defendant of a fair trial. We note that upon retrial the tapes utilized at the previous trial may be admitted into evidence. Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
47.207-2 Duration of contract and time of

performance.

The contracting officer shall-

(a) Establish a specific expiration date (month, day, and year) for the contract or state the length of

time that the contract will remain in effect; e.g.,6 months commencing from the date of award; and

(b) Include the following items as appropriate:

(1) A statement of the time period during which the service is required when the service is a onetime job; e.g.,a routine office relocation.

(2) A time schedule for the performance of segments of a major job; e.g., an office relocation for

which the work phases must be coordinated to meet other needs of the agency.

(3) Statements of performance times for particular services; e.g., pickup and delivery services.

Specify-

(i) On which days of the week and during which hours of the day pickup and delivery services may

be required;

(ii) The maximum time allowable to the contractor for accomplishing delivery under regular or

priority service; and

(iii) How much advance notice the contractor will be given for regular pickup services and, if

applicable, priority pickup services.

Parent topic: 47.207 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and special requirements.
§ 789.71 Records and reports. ( a ) Persons are required to make and preserve for at least 3 years, accurate and complete records of any transaction covered by this part or an official action.
( b ) Records must be maintained in sufficient detail to permit the determination, upon examination, of whether each transaction complies with the provisions of this part or any official action. However, this part does not specify any particular method or system to be used.
( c ) Records required to be maintained by this part must be made available for examination on demand by duly authorized representatives of USDA as provided in § 789.51.
( d ) In addition, persons must develop, maintain, and submit any other records and reports to USDA that may be required for the administration of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, and this part.
( e ) Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act, as implemented by Executive Order 13603, provides that information obtained under that section which the Secretary deems confidential, or with reference to which a request for confidential treatment is made by the person furnishing such information, will not be published or disclosed unless the Secretary determines that the withholding of this information is contrary to the interest of the national defense. Information required to be submitted to USDA in connection with the enforcement or administration of the Defense Production Act, this part, or an official action, is deemed to be confidential under section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act and will be handled in accordance with applicable Federal law.
§ 774.10 Other Federal, State, and local requirements. Borrowers are required to comply with all applicable: ( a ) Federal, State, or local laws;
( b ) Regulatory commission rules; and
( c ) Regulations which are presently in existence, or which may be later adopted including, but not limited to, those governing the following: ( 1 ) Borrowing money, pledging security, and raising revenues for repayment of debt;
( 2 ) Accounting and financial reporting; and
( 3 ) Protection of the environment.
§ 652.38 Scope of decertification. ( a ) When the technical service provider is a private sector entity or public agency, the decertifying official may decertify the entire organization, including all the individuals identified as authorized to provide technical services under the auspices of such organization. The decertifying official may also limit the scope of decertification, for example, to one or more specifically named individuals identified as authorized to provide technical services under the organization's auspices or to an organizational element of such private sector entity or public agency. The scope of decertification will be set forth in the decertification determination and will be based upon the facts of each decertification action, including whether actions of particular individuals can be imputed to the larger organization.
( b ) In cases where specific individuals are decertified only, an entity or public agency must file within 10 calendar days an amended Certification Agreement removing the decertified individual(s) from the Certification Agreement. In addition, the entity or public agency must demonstrate that, to the satisfaction of the Deputy Chief for Programs, the entity or public agency has taken affirmative steps to ensure that the circumstances resulting in decertification have been addressed.
[75 FR 6845, Feb. 12, 2010, as amended at 79 FR 44640, Aug. 1, 2014]
211.274-3 Policy for valuation.

(a) It is DoD policy that contractors shall be required to identify the Government’s unit acquisition

cost for all deliverable end items to which item unique identification applies.

(b) The Government’s unit acquisition cost is—

(1) For fixed-price type line, subline, or exhibit line items, the unit price identified in the contract at

the time of delivery;

(2) For cost-type or undefinitized line, subline, or exhibit line items, the contractor’s estimated fully

burdened unit cost to the Government at the time of delivery; and

(3) For items delivered under a time-and-materials contract, the contractor’s estimated fully

burdened unit cost to the Government at the time of delivery.

(c) The Government’s unit acquisition cost of subassemblies, components, and parts embedded in

delivered items shall not be separately identified.

Parent topic: 211.274 Item identification and valuation requirements.
§ 761.201 Purpose. ( a ) This subpart addresses: ( 1 ) The allocation of funds for direct and guaranteed FO, CL, and OL loans;
( 2 ) The establishment of socially disadvantaged target participation rates; and
( 3 ) The reservation of loan funds for beginning farmers.
( b ) The Agency does not allocate EM loan funds to State Offices but makes funds available following a designated or declared disaster. EM loan funds are available on a first-come first-served basis.
( c ) State funding information is available for review in any State Office.
[72 FR 63285, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 54013, Sept. 3, 2010]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cr-0169-WHA

)

WILLIAM EARL ULMER, )

Defendant. )

MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COPY EXPENSE

COMES NOW the defendant, William Earl Ulmer, by and through the undersigned

counsel, Timothy C. Halstrom, and respectfully requests this Honorable Court to allow this

indigent defendant to be reimbursed for expenses incurred when discovery was obtained in this

matter. As grounds in support thereof, the following is stated:

1. Discovery in this sixteen (16) defendant case is voluminous and consists of: 1)

7,428 paper copies; 2) 10 DVDs; 3) 19 CDs; 4) 1 floppy disc; 5) 5 VHS videos; and 6) 23 audio

cassette tapes.

2. The United States Attorney's Office made discovery in this case available through

the services of Pro Legal Copies of Montgomery, Inc. at the expense of the defendant.

3. Defendant Ulmer obtained a complete set of discovery costing the undersigned a

total of $1,220.60 (EXHIBIT “A”).

WHEREFORE, premises considered, Defendant respectfully requests this Honorable

Court to issue an Order allowing him reimbursement for such copying expenses.

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 145 Filed 03/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted this 24 day of March, 2007. th

s/ Timothy C. Halstrom

Timothy C. Halstrom (HAL )

Attorney for Defendant Ulmer

4170 Lomac Street

Montgomery, AL 36106

(334) 272-9524 Telephone

(334) 244-7474 Facsimile

halstromtim@aol.com email

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 24,2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the

following:

A. Clark Morris, AUSA

Post Office Box 197 

Montgomery, AL 36101-0197

John T. Harmon, AUSA

Post Office Box 197 

Montgomery, AL 36101-0197

s/Timothy C. Halstrom

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 145 Filed 03/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 761.402 Abbreviations and definitions. ( a ) Abbreviations and definitions for terms used in this subpart are provided in 7 CFR part 3 and § 761.2.
( b ) Definitions used only in this subpart include: ( 1 ) *Third party converter* means an individual or entity who: ( i ) Is in possession of agency security property, or money from the sale of security, in relation to a loan or other debt that the individual or entity was not liable for; or
( ii ) Assists, or participates knowingly or unknowingly, in the transportation or sale of agency security, in relation to a loan or other debt that the individual or entity was not liable for; or
( iii ) Assists, or participates knowingly or unknowingly, in temporarily or permanently relocating or concealing the location of agency security property, or money from the sale of agency security, in relation to a loan or other debt that the individual or entity was not liable for.
( 2 ) [Reserved]