alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Appellee Joseph Scibana notified this court that he was never served with

process in the district court and would not be filing a brief or otherwise participating in this appeal. After an examination of the appellant’s brief and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus the appeal is submitted on the appellant’s brief and the record. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted September 28, 2005 * Decided September 28, 2005

Before Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge No. 05-2344 LARRY STOCKS, Petitioner-Appellant ,

v. JOSEPH SCIBANA, Respondent-Appellee

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin No. 05-C-136-C Barbara B. Crabb, Chief Judge

. ORDER We AFFIRM the judgment for substantially the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough orders of April 6, 2005 and April 25, 2005. UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
§ 635.3 Reliance on incorrect actions or information. The Chief may grant equitable relief to any participant that NRCS determines is not in compliance with the requirements, terms and conditions of a covered program, and therefore ineligible for a payment, or other benefit, if the participant— ( a ) Acting in good faith, relied on action and advice from an NRCS employee or representative of USDA to their detriment;
( b ) Did not know or have sufficient reason to know that the action or advice upon which they relied would be detrimental; and
( c ) Did not act in reliance on their own misunderstanding or misinterpretation of the program provisions, notices, or information.
52.219-16 Liquidated Damages-Subcontracting Plan.       As prescribed in 19.708(b)(2), insert the following clause:          Liquidated Damages-Subcontracting Plan (Sep 2021)                                       (a) "Failure to make a good faith effort to comply with the subcontracting plan," as used in this clause, means a willful or intentional failure to perform in accordance with the requirements of the subcontracting plan approved under the clause in this contract entitled "Small Business Subcontracting Plan," or willful or intentional action to frustrate the plan.                                          (b) Performance shall be measured by applying the percentage goals to the total actual subcontracting dollars or, if a commercial plan is involved, to the pro rata share of actual subcontracting dollars attributable to Government contracts covered by the commercial plan. If, at contract completion or, in the case of a commercial plan, at the close of the fiscal year for which the plan is applicable, the Contractor has failed to meet its subcontracting goals and the Contracting Officer decides in accordance with paragraph (c) of this clause that the Contractor failed to make a good faith effort to comply with its subcontracting plan (see 19.705-7), established in accordance with the clause in this contract entitled "Small Business Subcontracting Plan," the Contractor shall pay the Government liquidated damages in an amount stated. The amount of probable damages attributable to the Contractor’s failure to comply shall be an amount equal to the actual dollar amount by which the Contractor failed to achieve each subcontract goal.                                          (c) Before the Contracting Officer makes a final decision that the Contractor has failed to make such good faith effort, the Contracting Officer shall give the Contractor written notice specifying the failure and permitting the Contractor to demonstrate what good faith efforts have been made and to discuss the matter. Failure to respond to the notice may be taken as an admission that no valid explanation exists. If, after consideration of all the pertinent data, the Contracting Officer finds that the Contractor failed to make a good faith effort to comply with the subcontracting plan, the Contracting Officer shall issue a final decision to that effect and require that the Contractor pay the Government liquidated damages as provided in paragraph (b) of this clause.                                          (d) With respect to commercial plans, the Contracting Officer who approved the plan will perform the functions of the Contracting Officer under this clause on behalf of all agencies with contracts covered by the commercial plan.                                          (e) The Contractor shall have the right of appeal, under the clause in this contract entitled, Disputes, from any final decision of the Contracting Officer.                                          (f) Liquidated damages shall be in addition to any other remedies that the Government may have.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.219 [Reserved]
AAM

- 13

- 099

- E December 6, 2012

Exemption No. 10190A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2010

- 1223

Ms. Valerie Williamson

President

Longhorn Helicopters, Inc.

10 Hayes Court

Trophy Club, TX 76262

Dea r Ms. Williamson :

This letter is to inform you that we have g ranted your petition to extend Exemption

No. 10190 . It explains the basis for our decision , describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By lette r dated November 9 , 2012 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

on behalf of Longhorn Helicopters, Inc. ( Longhorn Helicopters )

, for an extension of

Exemption No. 10190 . That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulatio ns (14 CFR) allows Longhorn Helicopters

, which is operating under separate parts

of the regulations, to cover its safety

- sensitive employees under one testing program

.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and re asons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the reque sted extension of the exemption would not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Longhorn

Helicopters

.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10190

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has

delegat ed to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions an d Limitations

1. E mployees of Longhorn Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations

at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of

the Longhor n Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10190 to January 31 , 2015,

unless so oner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser, M.D.

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 279 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the Act of June 7, 1924, to provide for the 

exercise of criminal jurisdiction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INDIAN PUEBLO LAND ACT AMENDMENTS. 

4 The Act of June 7, 1924 (43 Stat. 636, chapter 331), 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following: 
2 

S 279 RFH 

1 ‘‘SEC. 20. CRIMINAL JURISDICTION. 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided by 

3 Congress, jurisdiction over offenses committed anywhere 

4 within the exterior boundaries of any grant from a prior 

5 sovereign, as confirmed by Congress or the Court of Pri6 vate Land Claims to a Pueblo Indian tribe of New Mexico, 

7 shall be as provided in this section. 

8 ‘‘(b) JURISDICTION OF THE PUEBLO.—The Pueblo 

9 has jurisdiction, as an act of the Pueblos’ inherent power 

10 as an Indian tribe, over any offense committed by a mem11 ber of the Pueblo or an Indian as defined in title 25, sec12 tions 1301(2) and 1301(4), or by any other Indian-owned 

13 entity. 

14 ‘‘(c) JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES.—The 

15 United States has jurisdiction over any offense described 

16 in chapter 53 of title 18, United States Code, committed 

17 by or against an Indian as defined in title 25, sections 

18 1301(2) and 1301(4) or any Indian-owned entity, or that 

19 involves any Indian property or interest. 

20 ‘‘(d) JURISDICTION OF THE STATE OF NEW MEX21 ICO.—The State of New Mexico shall have jurisdiction 

22 over any offense committed by a person who is not a mem23 ber of a Pueblo or an Indian as defined in title 25, sections 
3 

S 279 RFH 

1 1301(2) and 1301(4), which offense is not subject to the 

2 jurisdiction of the United States.’’. 

Passed the Senate July 26, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
#### § 58.724 Blending.

To as great an extent as is practical, each vat of cheese should be divided and distributed throughout numerous cooker batches. The purpose being to minimize the preponderance and consequent influence of any one vat on the characteristics of the finished product, and to promote as much uniformity as is practical. In blending also consider the final composition requirements for fat and moisture. Quantities of salt, color, emulsifier and other allowable ingredients to be added shall be calculated and predetermined for each cooker batch.
```

[107th Congress Public Law 324]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ324.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 2789]]

Public Law 107-324
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain land to the 
      city of Haines, Oregon. <<NOTE: Dec. 4, 2002 -  [S. 1907]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE TO THE CITY OF HAINES, OREGON.

    (a) Conveyance.--As soon as practicable after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey, without 
consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to the parcel of land described in subsection (b) to the city of 
Haines, Oregon.
    (b) Description of Land.--The parcel of land referred to in 
subsection (a) is the parcel of Bureau of Land Management land 
consisting of approximately 40 acres, as indicated on the map entitled 
``S. 1907: Conveyance to the City of Haines, Oregon'' and dated May 9, 
2002.

    Approved December 4, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1907:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107-680 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 107-197 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate.
            Nov. 14, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
52.207-5 Option to Purchase Equipment.       As prescribed in 7.404, insert a clause substantially the same as the following:          Option to Purchase Equipment (Feb 1995)                                       (a) 						            The Government may purchase the equipment provided on a lease or rental basis under this contract. The Contracting Officer may exercise this option only by providing a unilateral modification to the Contractor. The effective date of the purchase will be specified in the unilateral modification and may be any time during the period of the contract, including any extensions thereto.                                          (b) 						            Except for final payment and transfer of title to the Government, the lease or rental portion of the contract becomes complete and lease or rental charges shall be discontinued on the day immediately preceding the effective date of purchase specified in the unilateral modification required in paragraph (a) of this clause.                                          (c) 						            The purchase conversion cost of the equipment shall be computed as of the effective date specified in the unilateral modification required in paragraph (a) of this clause, on the basis of the purchase price set forth in the contract, minus the total purchase option credits accumulated during the period of lease or rental, calculated by the formula contained elsewhere in this contract.                                          (d) 						            The accumulated purchase option credits available to determine the purchase conversion cost will also include any credits accrued during a period of lease or rental of the equipment under any previous Government contract if the equipment has been on continuous lease or rental. The movement of equipment from one site to another site shall be "continuous rental."                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.207 [Reserved]
PUBLIC LAW 107–263—OCT. 30, 2002 116 STAT. 1747

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3034 (S. 1222):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

June 25, 27, considered and passed House.

Oct. 17, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–263

107th Congress

An Act

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 89 River

Street in Hoboken, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Frank Sinatra Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

89 River Street in Hoboken, New Jersey, and known as the Hoboken

Main Post Office, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Frank

Sinatra Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Frank

Sinatra Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 30, 2002.

Oct. 30, 2002

[H.R. 3034]
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 24-0550 IRA HAYES HENDERSON

Petitioner, v. TOM GREEN, WARDEN, DAWSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Respondent. GRANT OF MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FILING FEE


### Motionto proceed without payment ofthe filing fee inthis matter is GRANTED. DATED: September 16, 2024.
BOWEN GREENWOOD Clerk ofthe Supreme Court 09/16/2024
Case Number: OP 24-0550
PROB 22 DOCKET NUMBER (Tran. Court)
(Rev. 2/88) 1:98CR21-001
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTION

DOCKET NUMBER (Rec. Court)

. g
J09CR WPT 140
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROBATIONER/SUPERVISED RELEASEE: DISTRICT DIVISION
Mykle Showers Williams Florida Northern Gainesville

NAME OF SENTENCING JUDGE

Maurice M. Paul, Senior United States District Judge

DATES OF PROBATIOI ERVISED | FROM TO
RELEASE 6/05/2009 6/04/2012

OFFENSE

Bank Robbery

PART 1 - ORDER TRANSFERRING JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3605 the jurisdiction of the probationer or supervised
releasee named above be transferred with the records of the Court to the United States District Court for the Middle District
of Florida, upon that Court’s order of acceptance of jurisdiction. This Court hereby expressly consents that the period of
probation or supervised release may be changed by the District Court to which this transfer is made without further inquiry

of this Court.*
bo 200g DO dessin 27 (Ee

Dat soho r United States District Judge

*This sentence may be deleted in the discretion of the transferring Court.

PART 2 - ORDER ACCEPTING JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that jurisdiction over the above-named probationer/supervised releasee be accepted
and assumed by this Court from and after the entry of this order.

Mirenper 6" 209

Effective Date United States District Judge

BETH A.
EA HED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

RecrdOd 19° LOUsDeF inf nO 331

&

et
11.303 Special requirements for paper.

(a) The following applies when agencies acquire paper in the United States (as defined in 23.001):

(1) Section 2(d)(ii) of Executive Order 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and

Transportation Management, establishes a 30 percent postconsumer fiber content standards for

agency paper use. Section 2(d)(ii) requires that an agency’s paper products must meet or exceed the

minimum content standard.

(2) Section 2(e)(iv) of Executive Order 13514 requires acquisition of uncoated printing and writing

paper containing at least 30 percent postconsumer fiber.

(b) Exceptions. If paper under paragraphs (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section containing at least 30

percent postconsumer fiber is not reasonably available, does not meet reasonable performance

requirements, or is only available at an unreasonable price, then the agency must purchase-

(1) Printing and writing paper containing no less than 20 percent postconsumer fiber; or

(2) Paper, other than printing and writing paper, with the maximum practicable percentage of

postconsumer fiber that is reasonably available at a reasonable price and that meets reasonable

performance requirements.

Parent topic: Subpart 11.3 - Acceptable Material
# L_2014175EN.01003101.xml

| 14.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 175/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/31

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 June 2014

appointing a member of the Scientific and Technical Committee

(2014/354/Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 134 thereof;

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission;

Whereas:

| (1) | By Decision 2013/412/Euratom (1), the Council appointed the members of the Scientific and Technical Committee (the ‘Committee’) for the period 25 July 2013 to 24 July 2018, |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Decision 2013/412/Euratom (1), the Council appointed the members of the Scientific and Technical Committee (the ‘Committee’) for the period 25 July 2013 to 24 July 2018,

| (2) | Following the resignation of Mr Edouard SINNER, a seat on the Committee has become vacant. A new member should therefore be appointed for the remainder of Mr Edouard SINNER's term of office, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following the resignation of Mr Edouard SINNER, a seat on the Committee has become vacant. A new member should therefore be appointed for the remainder of Mr Edouard SINNER's term of office,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Roland ZEYEN is hereby appointed a member of the Scientific and Technical Committee until 24 July 2018.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 12 June 2014.

For the Council

The President

Y. MANIATIS

---

(1)  Council Decision 2013/412/Euratom of 22 July 2013 renewing the membership of the Scientific and Technical Committee and repealing the Decision of 13 November 2012 appointing the members of the Scientific and Technical Committee (OJ L 205, 1.8.2013, p. 11).

1

---
52.247-28 Contractor’s Invoices.       As prescribed in 47.207-9(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for drayage or other term con- tracts for transportation or for transportation-related services:          Contractor’s Invoices (Apr 1984)          The Contractor shall submit itemized invoices as instructed by the agency ordering services under this contract. The Contractor shall annotate each invoice with the contract number and other ordering office document identification.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
#### § 633.10 Modifications.

The NRCS may approve modifications to the agreement or associated conservation plan after consultation with the Conservation District. Any modification must meet WBP program objectives, and must be in compliance with this part.
Premanufacture Notice (PMN) for P-99-1280, 

P-99-1281, and P-99-1282

A pubic copy of the sanitized PMN for these substances is not 

available.

For further information on obtaining a copy of this document 

contact:

Kenneth Moss, Chemical Control Division (7405M),

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,

Environmental Protection Agency,

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC 20460-0001

Telephone: 202-564-9232

Email: Moss.Kenneth@epa.gov
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Terra Media, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Monahan, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 12th day of September, 2008.   /s/ Thomas Monahan --------------------------------- President, Secretary, Treasurer, Director, and Chief Financial Officer and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) Date: September 12, 2008
Exhibit
13.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Rodman International Enterprise I,
Ltd.(the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Arnold P. Kling, President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
June 23, 2010





/s/ Arnold P. KlingArnold
      P. KlingPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### § 4280.401 Purpose.

This subpart implements the RBDG program administered by the Agency. Grants made under this subpart will be made to eligible entities for use in funding various business opportunity and business enterprise Projects that serve Rural Areas.