alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w1







Exhibit 10.1




AGREEMENT OF JOINT FILING




     The parties listed below agree that the Amendment No. 34 to Schedule 13D to which this
agreement is attached as an exhibit, and all further amendments thereto, shall be filed on behalf
of each of them. This Agreement is intended to satisfy Rule 13d-1(k) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
them shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument.



Dated: May 14, 2009




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	AIMCO-GP, INC.	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	(General Partner)	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	AIMCO-GP, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	AIMCO IPLP, L.P.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	AIMCO/IPT, INC.	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	(General Partner)	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	AIMCO/IPT, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	COOPER RIVER PROPERTIES, L.L.C.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	MADISON RIVER PROPERTIES, L.L.C.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Steve Cordes
 

Senior Vice President
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	of each of the foregoing entities
First Amendment to the Harvard Bioscience, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.1 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 HARVARD BIOSCIENCE, INC. SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 2000 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN 
 This First Amendment (“First Amendment”) to the Harvard Bioscience, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of February 24, 2009. The Plan is hereby amended
as set forth below. 
 1. Section 5(b) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows: 
  

	 	b)	Stock Options Granted to Independent Directors. 

 i) Automatic Grant of Options. 
 (1) Each Independent Director who is first elected to
serve as a Director shall be granted, on the fifth business day after his election, a Non-Qualified Stock Option to acquire 25,000 shares of Stock. 
 (2) The exercise price per share for the Stock covered by a Stock Option granted under this Section 5(b) shall be equal to the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the date the Stock Option is granted. 

(3) The Administrator, in its discretion, may grant additional Non-Qualified Stock Options to Independent Directors. Any such grant may
vary among individual Independent Directors. 
 ii) Exercise; Termination. 
 (1) Unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, an Option granted under Section 5(b) shall be exercisable as to one-third of
the shares of Stock covered thereby as of the first anniversary of the grant date, as to a second one-third of the shares of Stock covered thereby as of the second anniversary of the grant date, and as to the remaining one-third of the shares of
Stock covered thereby as of the third anniversary of the grant date. An Option issued under this Section 5(b) shall not be exercisable after the expiration of ten years from the date of grant. 
 (2) Options granted under this Section 5(b) may be exercised only by written notice to the Company specifying the number of shares to
be purchased. Payment of the full purchase price of the shares to be purchased may be made by one or more of the methods specified in Section 5(a)(iv). An optionee shall have the rights of a stockholder only as to shares acquired upon the
exercise of a Stock Option and not as to unexercised Stock Options. 
 DATE FIRST AMENDMENT APPROVED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS: February 24, 2009
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter                ended                December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15                U.S.C.                78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
47.303-9 F.o.b. vessel, port of shipment.

(a) Explanation of delivery term."F.o.b. vessel, port shipment" means free of expense to the

Government loaded, stowed, and trimmed on board the ocean vessel at the specified port of

shipment.

(b) Contractor responsibilities. The contractor shall-

(1)

(i) Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or

(ii) In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment for ocean transportation in conformance

with carrier requirements to protect the goods and to ensure assessment of the lowest applicable

transportation charge;

(2)

(i) Deliver the shipment on board the ocean vessel in good order and condition on the date or within

the period fixed; and

(ii) Pay and bear all charges incurred in placing the shipment actually on board;

(3) Provide a clean ship’s receipt or on-board ocean bill of lading;

(4) Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before delivery of the

shipment on board the ocean vessel; and

(5) At the Government’s request and expense, assist in obtaining the documents required for-

(i) Exportation; or

(ii) Importation at destination.

(c) Contract clause. The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at

52.247-37, F.o.b. Vessel, Port of Shipment, when the delivery term is f.o.b. vessel, port of shipment.

Parent topic: 47.303 Standard delivery terms and contract clauses.
### RECORD OF CONTACTS

**Docket No. FAA -**  **2012 -**  **1072 Contacts**  . With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?



### Organization Person Contacted Date Response Transport Canada Robert Farina 613 - 996 - 9178, 7/26/12 No Objections Bom bardier Aerospace Chester Liburski (514)855 - 5001 ext. 29036 7/26/12 No Objections Regional Airline Association Scott Foose 202 - 367 - 1170 Foose@raa.org 7/26/12 No Objections
1

Ogulei, David

From: Ogulei, David

Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 2:47 PM

To: Ogulei, David

Subject: Telephone Record - Call with SCAQMD - April 7, 2015

TELEPHONE RECORD 

Record of Telephone Conversation Between David Ogulei, EPA, and the South Coast Air Quality 

Management District (SCAQMD) 

Phone Call Initiated By: David Ogulei, Environmental Engineer, EPA 

Date & Time of Call: April 7, 2015, 4:20 PM Central Time 

Name & Title of Person Called: Dipankar Sarkar, Program Supervisor 

Science and Technology Advancement, SCAQMD 

Phone Number: (909) 396-2273 

Purpose of Call: To obtain an update on the SCAQMD’s plans to install and operate multimetals continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) 

Record of Conversation: 

Mr. Sarkar explained that the SCAQMD has rented one Xact multi-metals CEMS and one Xact fenceline 

monitor from Cooper Environmental Services (Cooper). The two instruments are being used to monitor 

emissions from two battery recycling facilities (Exide Technologies and Quemetco, Inc.). Mr. Sarkar stated that

the SCAQMD intends to operate the multi-metals CEMS for 10 months and the Xact fenceline monitor for 4 

months. At the conclusion of the current rental agreement, the SCAQMD would decide whether they want to 

purchase each instrument, rent it for a longer period or return it to Cooper. Mr. Sarkar stated that the multimetals CEMS has so far been in operation for 3 weeks while the Xact fenceline monitor has been in operation 

for 2 months and 2 weeks. 

Mr. Sarkar stated that the SCAQMD has conducted calibration tests and side-by-side evaluations comparing 

measurements made by the multi-metals CEMS and the Xact fenceline monitor to concurrent measurements 

made through CARB test methods. However, complete evaluation results are not yet available. According to 

Mr. Sarkar, preliminary test results show excellent agreement between the Xact measurements and CARB test 

data especially at high concentrations. However, concentrations close to the detection limit do not compare 

very well. Mr. Sarkar explained that they are able to remotely view and download the CEMS data through a 

modem that was installed at the unit. 

According to Mr. Sarkar, Exide and Quemetco are funding the multi-metals CEMS operation while the 

SCAQMD is funding the Xact fenceline monitor operation. 

##
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K  of Home  Equity  Loan  Trust  2006-HSA5  (the  "Exchange  Act  periodic
   reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

   In giving the  certifications  above, I have reasonably relied on information
   provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  parties:  JPMorgan Chase Bank,
   N.A. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.


Date:  March 26, 2007

By:     /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ----------------------
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title:    Managing Director
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 9-4 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 1
# L_2014125EN.01005301.xml

| 26.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 125/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 125/53

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 425/2014

of 22 April 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Tørrfisk fra Lofoten (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the application to register the name ‘Tørrfisk fra Lofoten’ submitted by the Norwegian producer group ‘Tørrfisk fra Lofoten AS’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the application to register the name ‘Tørrfisk fra Lofoten’ submitted by the Norwegian producer group ‘Tørrfisk fra Lofoten AS’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2).

Official Journal of the European Union

2

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Tørrfisk fra Lofoten’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Tørrfisk fra Lofoten’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 April 2014.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 361, 11.12.2013, p. 10.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.7. Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom

NORWAY

Tørrfisk fra Lofoten (PGI)

---
**Exhibit 33.1**

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP. **

**SERVICER’S REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period fromJanuary 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (the “Reporting Period”) of the Platform Transactions (as defined below) with the servicing criterion set forth in Item 1122(d)(3)(i)(C) of Regulation AB (12 CFR part 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(C)) (the“Applicable Servicing Criterion”) and no others**.**  The transactions covered by this Servicer’s Assessment are those securitizations of pools of mortgage loans that were completed on or after January 1, 2006 and prior to January 1,2007 for which the Asserting Party performed servicing functions set forth in Item 1122(d) and that included one or more classes of publicly offered securities registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Platform Transactions”).

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criterion for the Reporting Period, using the Applicable Servicing Criterion, and hasconcluded that it has complied in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criterion with respect to the Mortgage Loans. 

Deloitte & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Asserting Party’s assessment of compliance with theApplicable Servicing Criterion for the Reporting Period.

Date:  February 22, 2007

  /s/ Thomas G. LehmannName:  Thomas G. LehmannTitle:    President
§ 764.53 Processing the complete application. Upon receiving a complete loan application, the Agency will: ( a ) Consider the loan application in the order received, based on the date the application was determined to be complete.
( b ) Provide written notice to the applicant that the application is complete.
( c ) Within 60 calendar days after receiving a complete loan application, the Agency will complete the processing of the loan request and notify the applicant of the decision reached, and the reason for any disapproval.
( d ) Except for CL requests, if based on the Agency's review of the application, it appears the applicant's credit needs could be met through the guaranteed loan program, the Agency will assist the applicant in securing guaranteed loan assistance under the market placement program as specified in § 762.110(h) of this chapter.
( e ) In the absence of funds for a direct loan, the Agency will keep an approved loan application on file until funding is available. At least annually, the Agency will contact the applicant to determine if the Agency should retain the application or if the applicant wants the application withdrawn.
( f ) If funding becomes available, the Agency will resume processing of approved loans in accordance with this part.
[72 FR 63298, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 54015, Sept. 3, 2010]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 5:98cr2-SPM

ISRAEL HERNANDEZ,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation dated July 26, 2007 (doc. 188). Defendant requested and

was granted an extension of time to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United

States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed, however. 

Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined that the

report and recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 188) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s amended motion to vacate (doc. 175) and motion for

discovery (doc. 179) are denied.. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of October, 2007.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 5:98-cr-00002-RS-AK Document 192 Filed 10/24/07 Page 1 of 1
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 19, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00136-CV 

JONATHAN LUCKETT, Appellant 

V. 

SHARMEATRICE LUCKETT, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-12976 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

Appellant's brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated September 2, 2015, we 

notified appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both his 

brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file his 

brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. 

Thereafter, we granted appellant's motion to extend time to file his brief and ordered appellant's 

brief to be filed by October 21, 2015. To date, appellant has not filed his brief, requested an 

additional extension of time to file his brief, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding 

the status of this appeal. 

 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c). 

150136F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JONATHAN LUCKETT, Appellant 

No. 05-15-00136-CV V. 

SHARMEATRICE LUCKETT, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-12976. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee SHARMEATRICE LUCKETT recover her costs of this 

appeal from appellant JONATHAN LUCKETT. 

Judgment entered November 19, 2015.
52.252 [Reserved]

52.252-1 Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference.

52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated by Reference.

52.252-3 Alterations in Solicitation.

52.252-4 Alterations in Contract.

52.252-5 Authorized Deviations in Provisions.

52.252-6 Authorized Deviations in Clauses.

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
# L_2016040DE.01001601.xml

| 17.2.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 40/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 40/16

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2014/40/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 3. April 2014 zur Angleichung der Rechts- und Verwaltungsvorschriften der Mitgliedstaaten über die Herstellung, die Aufmachung und den Verkauf von Tabakerzeugnissen und verwandten Erzeugnissen und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 2001/37/EG

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 127 vom 29. April 2014
  )

Seite 34 Liste der textlichen Warnhinweise:

In der gesamten Liste wird der Punkt am Ende der einzelnen Warnhinweise bei allen Warnhinweisen in Anhang I gestrichen, und in Warnhinweis 7 wird das Komma nach dem Wort „Risiko“ gestrichen.

---
#### § 51.340 U.S. No. 1.

“U.S. No. 1” consists of apples of one variety, unless designated as mixed varieties, which are not overripe, which are free from decay, worm holes, freezing injury and internal breakdown and free from any other defect, or combination of defects, the removal of which in the usual commercial preparation for use will cause a loss of more than 5 percent, by weight, of the apple.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,Carlos Fabian De Sousa,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ Carlos Fabian De
  SousaCarlos
      Fabian De SousaChief
      Executive OfficerNovember
      11, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The
foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.