alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014008EN.01000101.xml

| 11.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/1

---

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

of 7 January 2014

on the appointment of a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank

2014/C 8/01

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 283(2) thereof,

Having regard to Protocol (No 4) on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 11.2 thereof,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS TO THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL:

To appoint Ms Sabine LAUTENSCHLÄGER as member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank for a term of office of 8 years.

Done at Brussels, 7 January 2014.

For the Council

The President

D. KOURKOULAS

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,992,796
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,079,531
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,079,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              892
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,078,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,079,531
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,652,950
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               363,206
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             360,093
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,929,651
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,929,651
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,929,651
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       103
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,591
<PREFERRED>                                    263,551
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2011-1068; 2010-NM-189-AD

Service Documents
#### § 70.3 Administration.

The Administrator shall perform, for and under the supervision of the Secretary, such duties as the Secretary may require in the enforcement or administration of the provisions of the Act and the regulations in this part. The Administrator is authorized to waive for limited periods any particular provisions of the regulations in this part to permit experimentation so that new procedures, equipment, grading, and processing techniques may be tested to facilitate definite improvements and at the same time to determine full compliance with the spirit and intent of the regulations in this part. The AMS and its officers and employees shall not be liable in damages through acts of commission or omission in the administration of this part.

[71 FR 42011, July 24, 2006]
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Clinton J. Wilson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report
on Form 10-KSB of IPtimize, Inc. for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business
issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors:

(a) All significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal controls which could adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the small business issuers
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls.



|                    |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 27, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Clinton J. Wilson                
|                    |  |  |  | Clinton J. Wilson                    
|                    |  |  |  | President and Chief Operating Officer
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls
o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :
A2 0 D0 01 2 . STATE OF GEORGI A v . J I GNESHKUMAR PATEL et a l
. Aft er t h e St at e co m

m en ced ci v i l fo rfei t u re pro ceed i n gs , cl ai m an t J i g n e s h k u m ar Pat el fi l ed a m o t i o n to d is m i s s

. On J u n e 24 , 2 0 1 9 , t h e t ri al co u r t

en t ered an o rd er d i s m i s si n g t h e co m p l ai n t

. Th e St at e fi led b ot h an ap p l i cat i o n fo r i n t erl o cu to ry ap p eal an d th i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r di s cret io n ary ap p eal

. W e g ran t e d t h e i n t erl o cu t o ry ap pl i cat i on

. See Cas e No

. A1 9 I0 2 8 4 , g ran t ed A u g

. 7 , 2 0 19

. Becau s e t h i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i on ary ap p eal i s d u pl i cat i v e, i t i s h e r e b y D ISM ISSED as
s u p erfl u o u s

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. August 15, 2019

08/15/2019
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 4 Filed 07/22/2003 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 4 Filed 07/22/2003 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 4 Filed 07/22/2003 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 4 Filed 07/22/2003 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 4 Filed 07/22/2003 Page 5 of 5
§ 631.1 Purpose. ( a ) The Great Plains Conservation Program (GPCP) is a special program targeted to the total conservation treatment of farm or ranch units with the most severe soil and water resources problems. The purpose of the program is to assist farm, ranch and other land users to make changes in their cropping systems and land uses which are needed to conserve, develop, protect, and utilize the soil and water resources of their lands. This purpose is achieved by controlling erosion, conserving water, and adjusting land use to mitigate climatic, soil, topographic, flood, saline and other natural hazards.
( b ) Program participation is voluntary and is carried out by applying a conservation plan encompassing an entire operating unit. A conservation plan is developed with the land user in consultation with the local conservation district and is used to establish a GPCP contract. This contract provides for cost sharing between the land user and the Secretary of Agriculture for applying needed land use adjustments and conservation treatment within a specified time schedule. The program is supplemental to, not a substitution for, other programs in the Great Plains area.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Esther Bernstein, Also Known as Esther Cymrot, Deceased. Minnie Luloff, as Executrix of Esther Bernstein, Deceased, Respondent; Benjamin Cymrot, Appellant.

Order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated August 6, 1968, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements payable by appellant personally. No opinion. We are once again constrained to admonish counsel that they must give citations to official reports in their briefs, unless the official reports do not contain the cases cited. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Kleinfeld and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1








Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,


18
U.S.C. Section 1350











I, Joel
H. Edelson, Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer of
Anasazi Capital Corp. (the “Corporation”), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge
that:




1.  the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.





Date:  April
15, 2010





By:/s/ Joel H.
Edelson


Joel
H. Edelson


Chief
Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer


(Principal Executive and Accounting
Officer)
46.304 Fixed-price service contracts.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.246-4, Inspection of Services-Fixed-Price, in

solicitations and contracts for services, or supplies that involve the furnishing of services, when a

fixed-price contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed the simplified

acquisition threshold. The contracting officer may insert the clause in such solicitations and

contracts when the contract amount is expected to be at or below the simplified acquisition

threshold and inclusion is in the Government’s interest.

Parent topic: Subpart 46.3 - Contract Clauses
52.213-3 Notice to Supplier.       As prescribed in 13.302-5(c), insert the following clause:          Notice to Supplier (Apr 1984)          This is a firm order ONLY if your price does not exceed the maximum line item or total price in the Schedule. Submit invoices to the Contracting Officer. If you cannot perform in exact accordance with this order, Withhold Performance, and notify the Contracting Officer immediately, giving your quotation.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.213 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

WILLIS MILLER,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5793/LAC/EMT

MARK INCH, et al., 

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on 

December 4, 2020 (ECF No. 9). Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 9) 

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to

Case 3:20-cv-05793-LC-EMT Document 10 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cv5793/LAC/EMT

comply with court orders.

3. The clerk of court is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of January, 2021.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05793-LC-EMT Document 10 Filed 01/08/21 Page 2 of 2
Case 5:02-cv-00343-MP Document 9 Filed 12/31/02 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALAN FRAIRE,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00275

- CR

Appeal from the

171st Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20170D05623)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 17 TH DAY OF JUNE , 20 21

.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
§ 654.14 Duration of sponsor(s)' responsibility. ( a ) Sponsor(s)' responsibility for O&M of a completed project measure begins when a part of all of the contract installing such measure is completed and accepted from the contractor. If the installation of the project measure is performed by force account, division of work, or performance of work methods, the sponsor(s)' O&M responsibilities begin on the date the work or portion thereof is completed as determined by NRCS, except for completed work located on Federal lands which are subject to special-use permits. The O&M agreement shall specify that O&M will continue through: ( 1 ) The evaluated life of the project, or
( 2 ) the evaluated life of measures that are economically evaluated as a unit, or
( 3 ) the useful life of cost-shared measures that are for land conservation or land utilization. The sponsor(s)' duties and liabilities for the measures under other Federal and State laws are not affected by the expiration of the O&M agreement.
( b ) For project measures being installed in segments, the sponsor(s) shall be responsible for O&M of completed and accepted segments. However, the NRCS may share in the cost of repairing damages to a completed segment when the damage is attributed to the continuation of work on uncompleted segments of the measure or when due to the fact that the measure was only partially completed.
#### Edward Fitzgerald *vs.*J. Royal McMurran.

Submitted on briefs May 9, 1894.

Affirmed May 24, 1894.

No. 8743.

Finding of fact upon affidavits sustained.

A finding, on motion to vacate an attachment, that defendant, notwithstanding his absence from this state, was still a resident, sustained.

Appeal by plaintiff, Edward Fitzgerald, from an order of the District Court of Bamsey County, *John W. Willis,*J., made November 18, 1893, vacating a wait of attachment.

Plaintiff commenced this action against defendant, J. Boyal McMurran, upon his note for $1,000 and interest dated December 22, 1892, due nine months thereafter. On affidavit that defendant was not a resident of the state plaintiff procured a writ of attachment under which the sheriff of Bamsey County on October 7, 1893, seized the defendant’s real estate. The summons was served by *313publication. On November 11, 1893, the defendant moved the court on affidavits showing him to be a resident of the state, temporarily absent on business, to vacate the attachment. The court granted the motion and plaintiff appeals.

*Horton & Denegre,*for appellant,

cited *Lawson v. Adlard,*46 Minn. 243; *Chase*v. *Ninth Nat. Bank,*56 Pa. St. 355; *Ludlow*v. *Ramsey,*11 Wall. 581; *Keller*v. *Carr,*40 Minn. 428.

*Jones & McMurran,*for respondent,

cited *Jones*v. *Swank,*51 Minn. 285; *Keller*v. *Carr,*40 Minn. 428; *Hurlbut*v. *Seeley,*11 How. Pr. 507; *Savage*v. *Scott,*45 Ia. 130; *Chariton County*v. Mo*berly,*59 Mo. 238.

Gilfillan, C. J.

Au attachment was issued against defendant’s property, on the ground that, as alleged, he was a nonresident. It was vacated upon affidavits from which the court below must have found that he was a resident. It is unnecessary to say more of the affidavits than that defendant was undoubtedly a resident up to January, 1893, and that from them the court might well conclude that at that time he left the state for a temporary business purpose, and without intending to abandon his residence here, and without intending to acquire or acquiring a residence elsewhere, and that, notwithstanding his absence, he continued a resident here.

Order affirmed.

Buck, J., absent, sick, took no part.

(Opinion published 59 N. W. 199.)
# L_2021430EN.01004201.xml

| 2.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 430/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 430/42

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2021/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 June 2021 establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe, amending and repealing Decision No 466/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU) 2017/1601 and Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 209 of 14 June 2021
  )

| (1) | the title on the Contents page and the title on page 1: |
| --- | --- |

(1)

the title on the Contents page and the title on page 1:

for:

‘Regulation (EU) 2021/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 June 2021 establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe, amending and repealing Decision No 466/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU) 2017/1601 and Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009’,

read:

‘Regulation (EU) 2021/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 June 2021 establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe, amending and repealing Decision No 466/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulation (EU) 2017/1601 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009’;

| (2) | on page 32, Article 25(2), point (c): |
| --- | --- |

(2)

on page 32, Article 25(2), point (c):

for:

| ‘(c) | exceptional assistance measures referred to in Article 23(4) for which the Union’s funding does not exceed EUR 20 000 000;’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(c)

exceptional assistance measures referred to in Article 23(4) for which the Union’s funding does not exceed EUR 20 000 000;’,

read:

| ‘(c) | exceptional assistance measures referred to in Article 23(6) for which the Union’s funding does not exceed EUR 20 000 000;’; |
| --- | --- |

‘(c)

exceptional assistance measures referred to in Article 23(6) for which the Union’s funding does not exceed EUR 20 000 000;’;

| (3) | on page 46, Article 38, paragraph 8, the first sentence: |
| --- | --- |

(3)

on page 46, Article 38, paragraph 8, the first sentence:

for:

‘8.   The Commission shall submit an annual report to the EFSD+ strategic board, to regional operational boards, to the European Parliament and to the Council on financial instruments, budgetary guarantees, including those implemented by the EIB, financial assistance in accordance with Article 41(4) and (5) and Articles 241 and 250 of the Financial Regulation.’,

read:

‘8.   The Commission shall submit an annual report to the EFSD+ strategic board, to regional operational boards, to the European Parliament and to the Council on financial instruments, budgetary guarantees, including those implemented by the EIB, financial assistance in accordance with Article 41(4) and (5) of this Regulation and Articles 241 and 250 of the Financial Regulation.’.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

SELWYN KING,

Petitioner

v.

HONORABLE TINA P. GARTLEY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 29 MM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2022, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the “Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Writ of Prohibition” 

and the Application for an Immediate Hearing are DENIED. The Prothonotary is 

DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption
#### § 58.54 Packing and packaging room and equipment.

Each applicant who is granted authority to package any product with official identification and who operates, for such purpose, a packaging room shall maintain the room and the equipment therein in accordance with this part.