alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of On the Block Rest. & Bar, Inc., Petitioner, v. New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Determination of State Liquor Authority annulled, in the exercise of discretion, without -costs or disbursements, and cause remanded for reconsideration. The nub of the charges herein is that the petitioner corporation, in connection with its 196<P65 application for renewal of its license, concealed and "suppressed information concerning a loan made to. it by one Yglesias, and that the petitioner failed to keep and maintain on the licensed premises adequate and accurate books and records of the business. The record emphasizes Yglesias’ participation in the business. The present principal divorced her husband in May of 1964. He arranged the loans from Yglesias and has not participated' in the business since July of 1964. The said loans have been repaid and the record fails to show any violations since July, 1964. Since there were no violations prior to those here involved, it may well be that cancellation of the license was excessive punishment. Concur—Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
§ 771.2 Abbreviations and definitions. The following abbreviations and definitions apply to this part: ( a ) Abbreviations: *APHIS* means the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the United States Department of Agriculture, or any successor Agency.
*FSA* means the Farm Service Agency, its employees, and any successor agency.
( b ) Definitions: *Extra payment* means a payment derived from the sale of property serving as security for a loan, such as real estate or vehicles. Proceeds from program assessments and other normal operating income, when remitted for payment on a loan, will not be considered as an extra payment.
*Non-profit corporation* means a private domestic corporation created and organized under the laws of the State(s) in which the entity will operate whose net earnings are not distributable to any private shareholder or individual, and which qualifies under the Internal Revenue Service code.
*Restructure* means to modify the terms of a loan. This may include a modification of the interest rate and/or repayment terms of the loan.
*Security* means assets pledged as collateral to assure repayment of a loan in the event of default on the loan.
*State organization* means a quasi-state run public operation exclusively established and managed by state and/or non-state employees, with all employees currently dedicated to the specific task of eliminating the boll weevil from the cotton growing area of the state.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Eddie Canterbury, ExecutiveVice President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Logan County BancShares, Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)   Reserved;

 

(c)   Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(d)   Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a)   All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: May  13, 2005 | /s/ Eddie  Canterbury                           |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                | Eddie  Canterbury, Executive Vice President and |
|                | Chief  Executive Officer                        |

 

----
§ 625.19 Appeals. ( a ) A person participating in the HFRP may obtain a review of any administrative determination concerning eligibility for participation utilizing the administrative appeal regulations provided in 7 CFR parts 11 and 614.
( b ) Before a person may seek judicial review of any administrative action concerning eligibility for program participation under this part, the person must exhaust all administrative appeal procedures set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, and for purposes of judicial review, no decision will be a final agency action except a decision of the Chief under these procedures.
( c ) Any appraisals, market analysis, or supporting documentation that may be used by NRCS in determining property value are considered confidential information, and will only be disclosed as determined at the sole discretion of NRCS in accordance with applicable law.
( d ) Enforcement actions undertaken by NRCS in furtherance of its federally held property rights are under the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court, and are not subject to review under administrative appeal regulations.
§ 764.203 Limitations. ( a ) The applicant must: ( 1 ) Comply with the general limitations established at § 764.102; and
( 2 ) Provide a minimum down payment of 5 percent of the purchase price of the farm.
( b ) Down payment loans will not exceed 45 percent of the lesser of: ( 1 ) The purchase price,
( 2 ) The appraised value of the farm to be acquired, or
( 3 ) $667,000; subject to the direct FO dollar limit specified in 7 CFR 761.8(a)(1)(i).
( c ) Down payment loans made as an ML for FO purposes may not exceed $50,000.
( d ) Financing provided by the Agency and all other creditors must not exceed 95 percent of the purchase price. Financing provided by eligible lenders may be guaranteed by the Agency under part 762 of this chapter.
[72 FR 63298, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 74345, Dec. 8, 2008; 79 FR 78693, Dec. 31, 2014; 81 FR 3293, Jan. 21, 2016; 86 FR 43392, Aug. 9, 2021]
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-6 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-6 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-6 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-6 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-6 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-6 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-6 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-6 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 8 of 8
#### Security National Bank of Long Island, Appellant, v. Louis De Joy et al., Defendants, and Peter Frazzetta et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover upon a promissory note (the cause against defendants De Joy) and upon a guarantee of payment of the note (the cause against defendants Frazzetta), plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 15, 1969, which denied its motion for summary judgment against defendants Frazzetta. Order reversed, on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements; motion granted; and action remitted for assessment of damages before the trial court without a jury, at a Trial Term, in accordance with CPLR 3212 (subd. [c]). Defendants De Joy, makers of the promissory note, were not served with process. Defendant Louis De Joy is presently in the United States Armed Services. Special Term held that defendants are entitled to the protection afforded by the New York State Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act (Military Law, art. XIII) and that the benefits thereof may be extended to parties who are secondarily liable (Military Law, § 302); held that plaintiff failed to demonstrate that Louis De Joy’s ability to conduct his *840defense is not materially affected by reason of his military service (Military Law, § 304); and stayed any proceeding to enforce the debt until 60 days after the completion of Louis De Joy’s military service. In our opinion, this was an abuse of discretion, since the relief granted had never been sought and there was nothing before the Special Term, except the fact of military service, on which to bottom such determination. Furthermore, in the guarantee executed by each of the defendants Frazzetta it is provided that the liability of the guarantors on the guarantee shall be direct and immediate and that they waive presentation and demand upon themselves and upon the maker or makers for payment of the note and also waive notice of nonpayment thereof, notice of intention to sell, advertisement, time or place of sale of the collateral therefor and all other notice in connection therewith. Since the only argument raised in defendant Louis De Joy’s affidavit was that the automobile was repossessed without notice to him, and that he was not given an opportunity to redeem the ear or advised as to the time or place of the sale, none of which argument was raised by respondents, and in fact the argument was waived by them, there is no issue of fact presented, except as to the amount due. A triable issue of fact is presented as to the amount due. Therefore, an assessment of damages is required. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
#### § 3430.700 Applicability of regulations.

The regulations in this subpart apply to the Federal assistance awards made under the program authorized under section 9008 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 8108), as amended by section 9001 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-246).

[76 FR 38549, July 1, 2011]
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 760.1910 Requirement to purchase crop insurance or NAP coverage. ( a ) Producers must report all crops that suffered a revenue loss in whole or in part due to a qualifying disaster event on form FSA-522, Crop Insurance and/or NAP Coverage Agreement.
( b ) All producers who receive ERP Phase 2 payments must file an accurate acreage report and purchase crop insurance or NAP coverage where crop insurance is not available, for the next 2 available crop years. For each crop reported according to paragraph (a) of this section, participants must obtain crop insurance or NAP, as may be applicable: ( 1 ) At a coverage level equal to or greater than 60 percent for insurable crops; or
( 2 ) At the catastrophic level or higher for NAP crops.
( c ) Availability will be determined from the date a producer receives an ERP payment and may vary depending on the timing and availability of crop insurance or NAP for a producer's particular crops. The final crop year to purchase crop insurance or NAP coverage to meet the second year of coverage for this requirement is the 2026 crop year.
( d ) In situations where crop insurance is unavailable for a crop, an ERP participant must obtain NAP coverage. Section 1001D of the Food Security Act of 1985 (1985 Farm Bill) provides that a person or entity with an AGI greater than $900,000 is not eligible to participate in NAP; however, producers with an AGI greater than $900,000 are eligible for ERP. To reconcile this restriction in the 1985 Farm Bill and the requirement to obtain NAP or crop insurance coverage, ERP participants may meet the purchase requirement by purchasing Whole-Farm Revenue Protection (WFRP) crop insurance coverage, if eligible, or they may pay the applicable NAP service fee despite their ineligibility for a NAP payment. In other words, the service fee must be paid even though no NAP payment may be made because the AGI of the person or entity exceeds the 1985 Farm Bill limitation.
( e ) If both Federal crop insurance and NAP coverage are unavailable for a crop, the producer must obtain WFRP crop insurance coverage, if eligible.
( f ) For all crops listed on form FSA-522, producers who have the crop or crop acreage in subsequent years and who fail to obtain the 2 years of crop insurance or NAP coverage required as required by this section, must refund the ERP Phase 2 payment with interest from the date of disbursement. Producers who do not plant a crop listed on form FSA-522 in a year for which this requirement applies are not subject to the crop insurance or NAP purchase requirement for that year.
( g ) Producers who received an ERP Phase 1 payment for a crop are not required to obtain additional years of crop insurance or NAP coverage for that crop if they also receive an ERP Phase 2 payment for a loss associated with that crop.
§ 766.204 Amortization of recapture. ( a ) The Agency will amortize the recapture into a Shared Appreciation Payment Agreement provided the borrower: ( 1 ) Has not ceased farming and the borrower's account has not been accelerated;
( 2 ) Provides a complete application in accordance with § 764.51(b), by the recapture due date or within 60 days of Agency notification of the amount of recapture due, whichever is later;
( 3 ) Is unable to pay the recapture and cannot obtain funds from any other source;
( 4 ) Develops a feasible plan that includes repayment of the shared appreciation amount;
( 5 ) Provides a lien on all assets, except those listed in § 766.112(b); and
( 6 ) Signs loan agreements and security instruments as required.
( b ) If the borrower later becomes delinquent or financially distressed, reamortization of the Shared Appreciation Payment Agreement can be considered under subpart C of this part.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.10


FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION




We use a combination of cash and stock-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on our Board. In setting director compensation, we consider the significant amount of time that directors expend in fulfilling their duties as well as the skill level required by us with respect to members of the Board. 


During 2017, each director, other than Kevin P. Riley and James R. Scott, received an annual retainer valued at $50,000, with at least $25,000 of that being paid in the form of equity and the remaining $25,000 paid in the form of cash or common stock at the Director's election. 


Committee members, committee chairpersons and our lead independent director received additional compensation as follows:	
				
	Committee
	Chair Retainer
	 
	Member Retainer

	Audit
	$12,500
	 
	$10,000

	Compensation
	11,250
	 
	7,500

	Governance
	10,000
	 
	5,000

	Credit
	10,000
	 
	5,000

	Technology
	10,000
	 
	5,000

	Risk
	10,000
	 
	5,000

	Executive
	—
	 
	5,000

	Lead Independent Director
	2,500
	 
	—




    
Directors are reimbursed for ordinary expenses incurred in connection with attending board and committee meetings.  Directors are also eligible for group medical insurance coverage at the director’s option. Under our deferred compensation plan, directors may elect to defer any cash portion of director’s fees until an elective distribution date or the director’s retirement, disability or death.
52.223-10 Waste Reduction Program.

As prescribed in 23.705(a), insert the following clause:

Waste Reduction Program (May 2011)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clauseRecycling means the series of activities, including collection, separation, and processing, by which

products or other materials are recovered from the solid waste stream for use in the form of raw

materials in the manufacture of products other than fuel for producing heat or power by combustion.

Waste prevention means any change in the design, manufacturing, purchase, or use of materials or

products (including packaging) to reduce their amount or toxicity before they are discarded. Waste

prevention also refers to the reuse of products or materials.

Waste reduction means preventing or decreasing the amount of waste being generated through

waste prevention, recycling, or purchasing recycled and environmentally preferable products.

(b) Consistent with the requirements of section 3(e) of Executive Order 13423, the Contractor shall

establish a program to promote cost-effective waste reduction in all operations and facilities covered

by this contract. The Contractor’s programs shall comply with applicable Federal, State, and local

requirements, specifically including Section 6002 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

(42 U.S.C.6962, etseq.) and implementing regulations (40 CFR Part 247).

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.223 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

LUMBERMAN’S UNDERWRITING * 

ALLIANCE and CAMBRIDGE * 

INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC. * 

as Subrogees of TRANSPORT LEASING/ * 

CONTRACT, INC.; HANSEN & ADKINS * 

AUTO TRANSPORT, * 

 * 

 Plaintiffs, * 

 * 

vs. * 3:06-CV-645-MEF 

 * 

EMORY LEE YOUNG * 

an individual, * 

 * 

 Defendants. * 

NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DISCOVERY DOCUMENTS

TO: Ms. Debra P. Hackett 

 Clerk of Court 

 U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 

 Via CM/ECF system filing 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following discovery documents have been served on 

behalf of the Defendant, Emory Lee Young: 

1. Defendant Emory Lee Young’s Requests for Production to Plaintiffs 

2. Defendant Emory Lee Young’s Interrogatories to Plaintiffs 

 __s/ Joshua J. Jackson___________________ 

Joshua J. Jackson (JAC072) 

Attorney for Defendant Emory Lee Young 

OF COUNSEL:

SAMFORD & DENSON, LLP 

P.O. Box 2345 

Opelika, AL 36803-2345 

(334) 745-3504 

FAX (334) 745-3506 

Email: jackson@samfordlaw.com

Case 3:06-cv-00645-MEF-TFM Document 8 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on December 19, 2006 I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the 

following: 

Michael S. Jackson 

Ryan Wesley Shaw 

Beers, Anderson, Jackson, Patty & Van Heest, P.C. 

P.O. Box 1988 

Montgomery, AL 36102-1988 

 

 /s/ Joshua J. Jackson______________ 

 OF COUNSEL 

Case 3:06-cv-00645-MEF-TFM Document 8 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 766.114 State-certified mediation or voluntary meeting of creditors. ( a ) A borrower who is unable to develop a feasible plan but is otherwise eligible for primary loan servicing may request: ( 1 ) State-certified mediation; or
( 2 ) Voluntary meeting of creditors when a State does not have a certified mediation program.
( b ) Any negotiation of the Agency's appraisal must be completed before State-certified mediation or voluntary meeting of creditors.
§ 799.44 Adoption of an EA prepared by another entity. ( a ) FSA may adopt an EA prepared by another Federal agency, State, or Tribal government if the EA meets the requirements of this subpart.
( b ) If FSA adopts another agency's EA and issues a FONSI, FSA will follow the procedures specified in § 799.44.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30546]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-73,303]


Weyerhaeuser Company Corporate Headquarters Including On-Site 
Leased Workers From Volt Services, Adecco, Manpower and Express 
Personnel Federal Way, Washington; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on June 2, 2010, applicable to workers of Weyerhaeuser Company, 
Corporate Headquarters, including on-site leased workers from Volt 
Services, Adecco, and Manpower, Federal Way, Washington. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2010 (75 FR 34177).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers supply 
corporate and administrative services for the firm.
    The company reports that workers leased from Express Personnel were 
employed on-site at the Federal Way, Washington location of 
Weyerhaeuser Company, Corporate Headquarters. The Department has 
determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of 
Weyerhaeuser Company, Corporate Headquarters to be considered leased 
workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Express Personnel working 
on-site at the Federal Way, Washington location of Weyerhaeuser 
Company, Corporate Headquarters.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-73,303 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Weyerhaeuser Company, Corporate Headquarters, 
including on-site leased workers from Volt Services, Adecco, 
Manpower, and Express Personnel, Federal Way, Washington, who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after January 
7, 2009, through June 2, 2012, and all workers in the group 
threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the 
date of certification through two years from the date of 
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of November 2010.
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-30546 Filed 12-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P