alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 63.501 Patents, copyrights, inventions, trademarks, information, publications, and product formulations.

Any patents, copyrights, inventions, trademarks, information, publications, or product formulations developed through the use of funds collected by the Board under the provisions of this subpart shall be the property of the U.S. Government, as represented by the Board, and shall, along with any rents, royalties, residual payments, or other income from the rental, sales, leasing, franchising, or other uses of such patents, copyrights, inventions, trademarks, information, publications, or product formulations, inure to the benefit of the Board; shall be considered income subject to the same fiscal, budget, and audit controls as other funds of the Board; and may be licensed subject to approval by the Secretary. Should patents, copyrights, inventions, trademarks, information, publications, or product formulations be developed through the use of funds collected by the Board under this part and funds contributed by another organization or person, ownership and related rights to such patents, copyrights, inventions, trademarks, information, publications, or product formulations shall be determined by agreement between the Board and the party contributing funds towards the development of such patents, copyrights, inventions, trademarks, information, publications, or product formulations in a manner consistent with this paragraph.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2758 

To amend the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act with respect 

to the labeling of cigarette packages, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2006 

Mr. LIEBERMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising 

Act with respect to the labeling of cigarette packages, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cigarette Litter Pre5 vention Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIRED STATEMENT ON CIGARETTE PACKAGES. 

7 Section 4(a) of the Federal Cigarette Labeling and 

8 Advertising Act (15 U.S.C. 1333(a)) is amended by add9 ing at the end the following: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2758 IS

1 ‘‘(4)(A) It shall be unlawful for any person to 

2 manufacture, package, or import for sale or distribu3 tion within the United States any cigarettes the 

4 package of which fails to bear, in accordance with 

5 the regulations promulgated by the Secretary under 

6 subparagraph (B), the following statement: ‘Please 

7 dispose of all cigarette waste properly. Do not lit8 ter.’. 

9 ‘‘(B) Not later than 180 days after the Ciga10 rette Litter Prevention Act, the Secretary shall pro11 mulgate regulations with respect to the placement, 

12 format, and type style of the label statement re13 quired under subparagraph (A).’’. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER JON PERGROSSI,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-180-AW-GRJ

EPIC GAMES,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is one of the many pro se cases Plaintiff Christopher Jon Pergrossi 

has filed in this District. Having considered the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (ECF No. 6) and having reviewed de novo the issues raised in the 

objection (ECF No. 9), I agree that the case should be dismissed.

Pergrossi lacks standing. He says he brings the suit because he has found 

wrongdoing. He says he is “not seeking any personal claim” and that he simply “saw

lawlessness occurring and [] will not stand for it.” ECF No. 5 at 7. As for harm, he 

says he is “always harmed by any monopoly . . . as are all people.” Id. at 8. He has 

not alleged enough to show standing, so the case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

If the court had jurisdiction, it would dismiss on the merits because Pergrossi has 

not stated a claim for relief.

The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction.” The clerk will then close the file.

Case 1:20-cv-00180-AW-GRJ Document 10 Filed 10/05/20 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED on October 5, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00180-AW-GRJ Document 10 Filed 10/05/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 760.1105 Application process. ( a ) Participants must submit to FSA: ( 1 ) A completed application in accordance with § 760.1104;
( 2 ) Adequate proof, as determined by FSA, that the feed lost: ( i ) Was for the claimed eligible livestock;
( ii ) Was lost as a direct result of an eligible disaster event during an eligible disaster period specified in § 760.1001;
( iii ) Was lost after January 1, 2005, but before February 28, 2007; and
( iv ) Occurred in the calendar year for which benefits are being requested; and
( 3 ) Any other supporting documentation as determined by FSA to be necessary to make a determination of eligibility of the participant. Supporting documents include, but are not limited to: verifiable purchase records; veterinarian records; bank or other loan papers; rendering truck receipts; Federal Emergency Management Agency records; National Guard records; written contracts; production records; Internal Revenue Service records; property tax records; private insurance documents; sales records, and similar documents determined acceptable by FSA.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 701.104 Producer eligibility. ( a ) To be eligible to participate in the ECP the Deputy Administrator must determine that a person or legal entity is an agricultural producer with an interest in the land affected by the natural disaster, and that person or legal entity must be liable for or have paid the expense that is the subject of the cost share. The applicant must be a landowner or user in the area where the qualifying event has occurred, and must be a party who will incur the expense that is the subject of the cost share.
( b ) Federal agencies and States, including all agencies and political subdivisions of a State, are ineligible to participate in the ECP.
( c ) All producer eligibility is subject to the availability of funds and an application may be denied for any reason.
[69 FR 10302, Mar. 4, 2004. Redesignated and amended at 75 FR 70088, Nov. 17, 2010]
Page 1 of 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Case No. DA 23-0106

CITY OF CUT BANK, 

Plaintiff/Appellee, 

-vsCHAD MICHAEL LARSON, 

Defendant/Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s Second Motion for Extension of Time 

Pursuant to Rule 26(1), M. R. App. P., and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time 

up to and including May 17, 2023 within which to prepare, file, and serve 

Appellant’s opening brief on appeal. 

ELECTRONICALLY DATED AND SIGNED BELOW.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 12 2023

04/12/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0106
**Exhibit 23.1**
 
 
 
 **Consent
        of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
        Firm**
  We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
        S-8 No. 333-139169) pertaining to the NextWave Wireless Inc. 2005 Stock
        Incentive Plan, the Cygnus Communications, Inc. 2004 Stock Option Plan and
        the
        PacketVideo Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan of NextWave Wireless Inc.
        of
        our report dated March 26, 2007, except for Note 14, as to which the date
        is
        March 29, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
        schedule of NextWave Wireless Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
        for
        the year ended December 30, 2006.
  /s/
        Ernst
& Young LLP
  San
        Diego, California
 March
        29,
        2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:01-CR-48-SPM/AK

GERALD CINEUS,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to reduce his

sentence under the retroactive crack cocaine amendment (Amendments 706 and

711) and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) and to appoint counsel (doc. 127).

Upon review, the Court finds that Defendant is not entitled to a sentence

reduction because application of the guideline amendment results in no change to

his sentencing range. Defendant was subject to a statutory mandatory minimum

sentence, which determined his sentencing range. Because this sentencing range

remains the same under the amended guidelines, in spite of the application of a

Rule 35 motion, which lowered Defendant’s sentence to 210 months, he is not

eligible for a reduction based on the crack amendments. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s motion to reduce sentence

and to appoint counsel (doc. 127) is hereby denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-eighth day of July, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:01-cr-00048-MW-CAS Document 133 Filed 07/28/08 Page 1 of 1
#### ARKENBURGH, Respondent, v. ARKENBURGH, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 12, 1906.)

Action by Oliver M. Arkenburgh against Robert H. Arkenburgh. C. E. Souther, for appellant, R. F. Little, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
#### §§ 701.213-701.225 [Reserved]
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Kohlberg Capital
Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008
(the “Report”), I, Michael I. Wirth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      March 25, 2009
                      
                      By
                      /
      S / Michael I. WirthMichael
      I. Wirth
                          Chief
      Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer
                            (Principal
      Financial
  Officer)
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2015150EN.01002401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 150/24 |

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 127 of 29 April 2014](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2014_127_R_TOC)
)

On page 19, point (f) of Article 10(1):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(f) | be reproduced in accordance with the format, layout, design and proportions specified by the Commission pursuant to paragraph 3;’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(f) | be reproduced in accordance with the format, layout, design and proportions specified by the Commission pursuant to paragraph 4;’. |

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                      20,723
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         259
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    432
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      71,124
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        71,850
<LOANS>                                    307,664
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             419,210
<DEPOSITS>                                 336,058
<SHORT-TERM>                                34,700
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,756
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,855
<COMMON>                                     8,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             419,210
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             13,116
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,989
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                38
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            15,143
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,024
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,162
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        8,981
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  429
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              8,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,775
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,775
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                11.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                11.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                8.03
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,557
<LOANS-PAST>                                   666
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,153
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  637
<RECOVERIES>                                   308
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,253
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0
         

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         334,987
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  387,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    798,937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,527,065
<PP&E>                                         666,084
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,359,835)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,254,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,848,525
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,185
<OTHER-SE>                                    (601,345)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,254,603
<SALES>                                          1,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,615
<CGS>                                           19,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (256,922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (256,922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (256,922)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-51072

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Esteban Quinonez-Quinonez, 

Defendant—Appellant, 

consolidated with

_____________

No. 22-51079

_____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Esteban Valentin Quinonez-Quinonez, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 4, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-51072 Document: 00516739118 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/04/2023
No. 22-51072 

c/w No. 22-51079

2

_____________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC Nos. 4:22-CR-633-1, 7:21-CR-323-1

______________________________

Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Esteban Valentin Quinonez-Quinonez appeals his conviction and 

sentence for illegal reentry into the United States under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) 

and (b)(1). He also appeals the district court’s order revoking the term of 

supervised release he was serving at the time of the offense. Because his 

appellate brief does not address the revocation or revocation sentence, he has

abandoned any challenge to that order. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 

224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

For the first time on appeal, Quinonez-Quinonez argues that his 

sentence exceeds the statutory maximum and is therefore unconstitutional 

because the district court enhanced his sentence under § 1326(b) based on 

the fact of a prior conviction that was not alleged in the indictment or found 

by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He raises the issue to preserve it for 

further review and has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition, 

correctly conceding that the issue is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. 

United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 

553-54 (5th Cir. 2019).

Because his argument is foreclosed, summary disposition is 

appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th 

Cir. 1969). Accordingly, Quinonez-Quinonez’s motion for summary 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 22-51072 Document: 00516739118 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/04/2023
No. 22-51072

c/w No. 22-51079

3

disposition is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgments are

AFFIRMED.

Case: 22-51072 Document: 00516739118 Page: 3 Date Filed: 05/04/2023
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 72 DB 2020 (No. 46 RST 2020)

:

SANH BRIAN TRAN : Attorney Registration No. 311889

: 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

 FROM INACTIVE STATUS : (Northumberland County)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of July, 2020, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated July 2, 2020, is approved and it is ORDERED that Sanh 

Brian Tran, who has been on Inactive Status, has never been suspended or disbarred, 

and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in 

law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby 

reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses 

incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by 

the Petitioner.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) CASE NO: 2:06cr178-SRW 

 ) 

CARRIE J. FLOWERS ) 

MOTION TO CONTINUE

COMES NOW the Defendant, Carrie J. Flowers, by and through her 

attorney of record and hereby asks this Honorable Court to continue the trial of 

this case from January 8, 2007 at 10:00a.m. to a later date on the following 

grounds: 

 1. That the below signed attorney has a trial scheduled in the Northern 

District of Alabama entitled United States v. Barber, et al. Said case involves 

multiple defendants and is scheduled to last approximately two (2) weeks. Said 

case was set for trial prior to the setting of this case. 

 2. That the Honorable Captain Aaron M. Drake, Special Assistant 

United States Attorney does not object to a continuance. 

 3. That no harm or prejudice will be done by continuing said case. 

 4. That a Waiver of Speedy Trial has already been filed by the 

Defendant. 

 WHEREFORE the premises considered, the below signed attorney 

respectfully asks this Honorable Court to continue the trial of this matter currently 

scheduled for January 8, 2006 at 10:00a.m. to a later date. 

Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 13 Filed 11/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this the 27th day of November, 2006. 

 /s/ Ronald W. Wise 

 Bar Number: WISER0904 

 Attorney for Carrie J. Flowers 

 2000 Interstate Park Drive 

 Suite 105 

 Montgomery, Alabama 36109 

 (334) 260-0003 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I do hereby certify that on November 27, 2006, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send 

notification of such filing to counsel of record. 

 /s/ Ronald W. Wise 

Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 13 Filed 11/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### § 54.1004 Administration and implementation.

The Administrator designates the administration and implementation of the Certification of Sanitary Design and Fabrication of Equipment Used in the Processing of Livestock and Poultry Products service to the Dairy Grading Branch, Dairy Programs, Agricultural Marketing Service. The Chief is charged with the administration, under the general supervision and direction of the Deputy Administrator, of the regulations and the Act insofar as they relate to equipment or utensils used to process livestock and poultry products.
§ 4280.406 Conflict of interest. ( a ) *General.* No conflict of interest or appearance of conflict of interest will be allowed. For purposes of this subpart, Conflict of Interest includes, but is not limited to, distribution or payment of grant, guaranteed loan funds, and matching funds or award of Project construction contracts to an individual owner, partner, or stockholder, or to a beneficiary or immediate family of the applicant or grantee when the recipient will retain any portion of ownership in the applicant's or grantee's Project. Grant and matching funds may not be used to support costs for services or goods going to, or coming from, a person or entity with a real or apparent conflict of interest. All transactions must be Arm's-length Transactions.
( b ) *Assistance to employees, relatives, and associates.* The Agency will process any requests for assistance under this subpart in accordance with 7 CFR part 1900, subpart D.
( c ) *Member/delegate clause.* No member of or delegate to Congress shall receive any share or part of this grant or any benefit that may arise therefrom; but this provision shall not be construed to bar, as a contractor under the grant, a publicly held corporation whose ownership might include a member of Congress so long as the member's ownership is less than 10 percent.