alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2877 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of Foramsulfuron and 

Iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of 

Foramsulfuron and Iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF FORAMSULFURON AND 

4 IODOSULFURON-METHYL-SODIUM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2877 IS 

‘‘ 9902.11.49 Mixtures of N,N-dimethyl2[3-(4,6- 

dimethoxypyrimidin-2- 

yl)ureidosulfonyl]-4- 

formylaminobenzamide 

(Foramsulfuron) (CAS No. 

173159–57–4), methyl 4- 

iodo-2-[3-(4-methoxy-6- 

methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2- 

yl)ureidosulfonyl]benzoate, 

sodium salt (Iodosulfuronmethyl-sodium) (CAS No. 

144550–36–7) and application adjuvants (provided for 

in subheading 3808.30.15) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2705 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2705

       To suspend temporarily the duty on Hexythiazox Technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 2006

    Mr. Kyl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on Hexythiazox Technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HEXYTHIAZOX TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.12.08        trans-5-(4-             Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           Chlorophenyl)-N-                                                  31/2009          ''
                           cyclohexyl-4-methyl-2-                                                              .
                           oxothiazolidine-3-
                           carboxamide
                           (Hexythiazox
                           Technical) (CAS No.
                           78587-05-0) (provided
                           for in subheading
                           2934.10.10)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
225.872-1 General.       (a) As a result of memoranda of understanding and other international agreements, DoD has determined it inconsistent with the public interest to apply restrictions of the Buy American statute or the Balance of Payments Program to the acquisition of qualifying country end products from the following qualifying countries:          Australia          Belgium          Canada          Czech Republic          Denmark          Egypt          Estonia          Federal Republic of Germany          Finland          France          Greece          Israel          Italy          Japan          Latvia          Lithuania          Luxembourg          Netherlands          Norway          Poland          Portugal          Slovenia          Spain          Sweden          Switzerland          Turkey          United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland          (b) Individual acquisitions of qualifying country end products from the following qualifying country may, on a purchase-by-purchase basis (see 225.872-4 ), be exempted from application of the Buy American statute and the Balance of Payments Program as inconsistent with the public interest:                    Austria(c) The determination in paragraph (a) of this subsection does not limit the authority of the Secretary concerned to restrict acquisitions to domestic sources or reject an otherwise acceptable offer from a qualifying country source when considered necessary for national defense reasons.    **Parent topic:** 225.872 Contracting with qualifying country sources.
#### § 657.2 Policy.

It is NRCS policy to make and keep current an inventory of the prime farmland and unique farmland of the Nation. This inventory is to be carried out in cooperation with other interested agencies at the National, State, and local levels of government. The objective of the inventory is to identify the extent and location of important rural lands needed to produce food, feed, fiber, forage, and oilseed crops.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Chaka Moxley, Appellant, v Anthony Zon, as Superintendent of Wende Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 6, 2007;

decided September 18, 2007

Reported below, 34 AD3d 1185.

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic *[see*8 NY3d 811].
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2987 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on railway car body shells 

of stainless steel designed for gallery type railway cars. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on railway car 

body shells of stainless steel designed for gallery type 

railway cars. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RAILWAY CAR BODY SHELLS OF STAINLESS 

4 STEEL DESIGNED FOR GALLERY TYPE RAIL5 WAY CARS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.86.07 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 railway car body shells of stainless steel designed for gal9 lery type railway cars) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

10 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2987 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
252.225-7005 Identification of Expenditures in the United States.       As prescribed in                 225.1103             (1), use the following clause:          IDENTIFICATION OF EXPENDITURES IN THE UNITED STATES (JUN 2005)          (a)  *Definition*.  “United States,” as used in this clause, means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas.          (b)  This clause applies only if the Contractor is—          (1)  A concern incorporated in the United States (including a subsidiary that is incorporated in the United States, even if the parent corporation is not incorporated in the United States); or          (2)  An unincorporated concern having its principal place of business in the United States.          (c)  On each invoice, voucher, or other request for payment under this contract, the Contractor shall identify that part of the requested payment that represents estimated expenditures in the United States.  The identification—          (1)  May be expressed either as dollar amounts or as percentages of the total amount of the request for payment;          (2)  Should be based on reasonable estimates; and          (3)  Shall state the full amount of the payment requested, subdivided into the following categories:          (i)  U.S. products—expenditures for material and equipment manufactured or produced in the United States, including end products, components, or construction material, but excluding transportation;          (ii)  U.S. services—expenditures for services performed in the United States, including all charges for overhead, other indirect costs, and profit under construction or service contracts;          (iii)  Transportation on U.S. carriers—expenditures for transportation furnished by U.S. flag, ocean, surface, and air carriers; and          (iv)  Expenditures not identified under paragraphs (c)(3)(i) through (iii) of this clause.          (d)  Nothing in this clause requires the establishment or maintenance of detailed accounting records or gives the U.S. Government any right to audit the Contractor's books or records.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.225 RESERVED
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:97-cr-00037-MP

BENJAMIN LEON WASHINGTON, 1:97-cr-00024 - MP

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

On Thursday, March 30, 2006, Defendant was scheduled for a hearing on the possible

revocation of his supervised release. At the hearing, an oral motion to continue was made. No

objections were made to this motion. Accordingly, the motion is granted. Defendant's

revocation hearing is hereby rescheduled for Wednesday, May 24, 2006, at 10:00 a.m.

DONE AND ORDERED this 31st day of March, 2006

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:97-cr-00037-MP Document 45 Filed 03/31/2006 Page 1 of 1
 Case 1:97-cr-00024-MP Document 35 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 57

#### Editorial Note:

1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

#### § 57.22 Basis of service.

This part provides for inspection services pursuant to the Egg Products Inspection Act, as amended. Eggs shall be inspected in accordance with such standards, methods, and instructions as may be issued or approved by the Administrator. Inspection services shall be subject to supervision at all times by the applicable Federal-State supervisor, staff officer, regulatory officer, regional director, and national supervisor.

[69 FR 57166, Sept. 24, 2004]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE
and ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE,
Plaintiffs,
v. Case No.: 1:20-cv-127-AW-GRJ

ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., and
JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA
Defendants.
/

VERDICT
We, the jury, return the following verdict:

1. Was there negligence on the part of Defendant, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, which
was a legal cause of damage to the Plaintiff, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE?

ANSWER: YES__X NO.
If your answer to question 1 is NO, your verdict is for the Defendants, and you should not proceed
further, except to date and sign this verdict form and return it to the courtroom. If your answer to

question 1 is YES, please answer question 2.

Ds What is the amount of any damages sustained by Plaintiff, MARCELLE ANN
ANGALL-LEONCE, for medical expenses,

a. in the past? g 10,000
b. in the future? $ lOO, COO

Please answer question 3.

3. What is the amount of any damages sustained by the Plaintiff, MARCELLE ANN
ANGALL-LEONCE, for lost earnings or earning ability,

a. in the past? $ 3 80,000
b. in the future? g__ 200,000
c. Total of the above damages (add lines 2a, 2b, 3a and 3b) st SO,00O

Please answer question 4.

Figg Open Court
Fio-3b2t

Clerk¥U.S. District Court

Northern District of Florida



4. Did Plaintiff, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE, sustain a permanent injury
within a reasonable degree of medical probability as a result of the incident complained of?

ANSWER: YES. NO__X

If your answer to question 4 is NO, you should not proceed further except to date and sign this
verdict form and return it to the courtroom. If your answer to question 4 is YES, please answer
question 5.

5. What is the total amount of damages of Plaintiff, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-
LEONCE, for pain and suffering, bodily injury, disability, aggravation of prior medical condition,
mental anguish, and loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, sustained in the past and to be
sustained in the future?

a. in the past? $.
b. in the future? $,
c. Total of the above damages (add lines 5a and 5b): $.
Total of the above damages (add lines 3c and 5c): §.

Please answer question 6.

6. What is the total amount of any damages of Plaintiff, ROMANUS SYLVESTER
LEONCE, for loss, by reason of his wife’s injury, of her services, comfort, society, and attentions,

a. in the past? $_S, 000
b. in the future? §.
¢. Total of the above damages (add lines 6a and 6b): $_ 5,000

SO SAY WE ALL, this 1lo_ day of April, 2021.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<CAPTION>
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                      18,947
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         341
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             6,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    406
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      72,718
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        73,540
<LOANS>                                    313,445
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             432,759
<DEPOSITS>                                 383,001
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,524
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,910
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,313
<COMMON>                                     8,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             432,759
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,416
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              947
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                75
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,438
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,929
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,429
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   50
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                856
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     581
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   581
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 3.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 3.54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                7.57
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,916
<LOANS-PAST>                                   289
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,283
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  204
<RECOVERIES>                                   169
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,298
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,298
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0
         

</TABLE>
52.222-25 Affirmative Action Compliance.       As prescribed in 22.810(d), insert the following provision:          Affirmative Action Compliance (Apr 1984)          The offeror represents that-                                       (a) It □ has developed and has on file, □ has not developed and does not have on file, at each establishment, affirmative action programs required by the rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor (41 CFR 60-1 and 60-2); or                                          (b) It □ has not previously had contracts subject to the written affirmative action programs requirement of the rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor.                                 (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.222 [Reserved]
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Carl Edward Duhamel, * From the 244th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. C-20-0599-CR.

Vs. No. 11-22-00192-CR * May 30, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. 

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Subpart 246.1 - GENERAL

Parent topic: Part 246 - QUALITY ASSURANCE

246.101 Definitions.

“Discipline Working Group,” as used in this subpart, is defined in the clause at 252.246-7004 , Safety

of Facilities, Infrastructure, and Equipment for Military Operations.

246.102 Policy.

Departments and agencies shall also—

(1) Develop and manage a systematic, cost-effective Government contract quality assurance program

to ensure that contract performance conforms to specified requirements. Apply Government quality

assurance to all contracts for services and products designed, developed, purchased, produced,

stored, distributed, operated, maintained, or disposed of by contractors.

(2) Conduct quality audits to ensure the quality of products and services meet contractual

requirements.

(3) Base the type and extent of Government contract quality assurance actions on the particular

acquisition.

(4) Provide contractors the maximum flexibility in establishing efficient and effective quality

programs to meet contractual requirements. Contractor quality programs may be modeled on

military, commercial, national, or international quality standards.

246.103 Contracting office responsibilities.

(1) The contracting office must coordinate with the quality assurance activity before changing any

quality requirement.

(2) The activity responsible for technical requirements may prepare instructions covering the type

and extent of Government inspections for acquisitions that are complex, have critical applications, or

have unusual requirements. Follow the procedures at PGI 246.103 (2) for preparation of

instructions.
Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 1 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 2 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 3 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 4 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 5 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 6 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 7 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 8 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 9 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 10 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 11 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 12 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 13 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 14 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 15 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 16 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 17 of 18
Un-Official

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/30/20 Page 18 of 18
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 21 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 21 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Daniel Martinez-Atkinson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of DMA Minerals Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
29th day of October, 2007.


/s/ Daniel Martinez-Atkinson
----------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer