alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 279 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 279

   To amend the Act of June 7, 1924, to provide for the exercise of 
                         criminal jurisdiction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2005

 Mr. Domenici (for himself and Mr. Bingaman) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Act of June 7, 1924, to provide for the exercise of 
                         criminal jurisdiction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CRIMINAL JURISDICTION.

    The Act of June 7, 1924 (43 Stat. 636, chapter 331) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 20. CRIMINAL JURISDICTION.

    ``(a) In General.--Except as otherwise provided by Congress, 
jurisdiction over offenses committed anywhere within the exterior 
boundaries of any grant from a prior sovereign, as confirmed by 
Congress or the Court of Private Land Claims to a Pueblo Indian tribe 
of New Mexico, shall be as provided in this section.
    ``(b) Jurisdiction of the Pueblo.--The Pueblo shall have 
jurisdiction, as an act of the inherent power of the Pueblo as an 
Indian tribe, over any offense committed by a member of the Pueblo or 
of another federally recognized Indian tribe, or by any other Indian-
owned entity.
    ``(c) Jurisdiction of the United States.--The United States shall 
have jurisdiction over any offense described in chapter 53 of title 18, 
United States Code, committed by or against a member of any federally 
recognized Indian tribe or any Indian-owned entity, or that involves 
any Indian property or interest.
    ``(d) Jurisdiction of the State of New Mexico.--The State of New 
Mexico shall have jurisdiction over any offense committed by a person 
who is not a member of a federally recognized Indian tribe, which 
offense is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee

FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, 

FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA, 

FKA FUJIFILM USA, INC.,

Defendants

______________________ 

2015-1552

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of New York in No. 1:12-cv-00779-RJS, 

Judge Richard J. Sullivan.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

GEORGE PAZUNIAK, O'Kelly, Ernst, & Bielli, LLC, 

Wilmington, DE, argued for plaintiff-appellant. 

SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM, DLA Piper LLP (US), San Diego, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented 
 

by STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI III, ERIN GIBSON, DAVID 

RAE KNUDSON; BRIAN K. ERICKSON, Austin, TX.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and STOLL,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 9, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2537 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2537

       To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyfluthrin (Baythroid).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2006

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyfluthrin (Baythroid).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYFLUTHRIN (BAYTHROID).

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

``      9902.10.67      Cyano(4-fluoro-3-   3.5%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         phenoxyphenyl)met                                                  31/2009
                         hyl 3 (2,2-
                         dichloroethenyl)-
                         2,2-
                         dimethylcycloprop
                         anecarboxylate
                         (Cyfluthrin,
                         excluding b-
                         Cyfluthrin) (CAS
                         No. 68359-37-5)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2926.90.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |

| **CDC Contents**In the NewsTravelers' HealthHealth Topics A-ZPublications, Software & ProductsData & StatisticsTraining & EmploymentSubscriptionsOther SitesVisitor Survey

**Current      Health Related Hoaxes and Rumors**

- **False Report: HIV and AIDSFalse Email Report: Hantavirus Spread by       			Contact With Soda Cans or Grocery Packages
False Email Report: Klingerman Virus
False Internet Report: Bananas
Needle Stick Hoaxes

Privacy Policy Notice
About CDC | Announcements |    Funding | Publications |     Contact Us

CDC Home |     Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page last reviewed September 29, 2000

United States Department of Health and     Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1

5:97cr10LAC - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. CLAUDIA N. BROWN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs

CLAUDIA N. BROWN

Case No.5:97cr10LAC

ORDER

Your document, PETITION FOR WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS and APPENDIX is referred

to the undersigned with the following deficiencies:

The attorney who signed the document is not admitted to practice in the

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA [See N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 11.1(C)].

Attorney must certify that he or she has successfully completed the

computer-based tutorials on local rules and this court’s CM/ECF systems

pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 11.1(C)(2).

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the submitted hard copy of the document shall

be returned to you by the Clerk without electronic filing. 

DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of February, 2006.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:97-cr-00010-LC-MD Document 112 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 1
Earth from space
View of the planet Earth from the *Apollo* spacecraft. The Red Sea,
which separates Saudi Arabia from the continent of Africa, is clearly visible
at the top. (Photograph courtesy of NASA.)
Authors: W. Jacquelyne Kious and Robert I. Tilling



## *Contents*

|                                  |                           |                            |                            
|--------------------------------- | ------------------------- | -------------------------- | ---------------------------
|Preface                           | Historical perspective    | Developing the theory      | Understanding plate motions
|                                  |                           |                            |                            
|"Hotspots": Mantle thermal plumes | Some unanswered questions | Plate tectonics and people | Endnotes                   



---

### Ordering Instructions

### Version History

Version 1.20

The online edition contains all text from the original book in its entirety.
Some figures have been modified to enhance legibility at screen
resolutions.

### Linked Websites

Please visit the Smithsonian Institution  This Dynamic Planet website.   This site provides interactive mapping functions (including zoom), contains additional information not shown on the printed paper map, and includes downloadable PDF files of all map components and HTML pages.

See also This Dynamic Planet, the map showing the Earth's physiographic features, current plate movements, and locations of volcanoes, earthquakes, and impact craters.

The USGS also has created a website for teachers: This Dynamic Planet: A Teaching Companion.

---

Any use of trade, product, or firm names in
      this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement
      by the U.S. Government.

---

Accessibility
            FOIA
            Privacy
            Policies and Notices U.S. Department of the Interior |
            U.S. Geological Survey
           	URL: *http://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/gip/dynamic/dynamic.html*
            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact
           	Page Last Modified: Wednesday, 30-Nov-2016 12:17:27 EST
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-169-WKW

)

DEMETRIOUS TERELL PEGUES, et al. )

ORDER

This case is before the court on the United States of America’s (“Government”) Motion to

Continue Trial (Doc. # 275). The criminal case is currently set for trial during the August 6, 2007,

trial term. For the reasons that follow, the court finds that the trial for all defendants should be

continued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h).

While the grant of a continuance is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge, United

States v. Stitzer, 785 F.2d 1506, 1516 (11th Cir. 1986), the Court is limited by the requirements of

the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The Act provides in part:

In any case in which a plea of not guilty is entered, the trial of a defendant charged

in an information or indictment with the commission of an offense shall commence

within seventy days from the filing date (and making public) of the information or

indictment, or from the date the defendant has appeared before a judicial officer of

the court in which such charge is pending, whichever date last occurs.

18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1). However, the Act excludes from the 70 day period any continuance based

on “findings that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the

public and the defendant in a speedy trial.” § 3161(h)(8)(A).

 The court finds that the ends of justice served by continuing this trial outweigh the best

interest of the public and all defendants in a speedy trial. This is a sixteen defendant case and the

issues presented are complex. Further, the Government, in its motion to continue, represents that

several defendants have presented information in hopes of reducing their sentences. The information

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 276 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

proffered is lengthy and necessitates an extension of the trial date. Additionally, the Government

acknowledges that the discovery in this case is more voluminous in comparison to other criminal

cases. Adequate review of discovery would merit an extension of the trial date. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Government’s Motion to Continue Trial (Doc. # 275) is GRANTED. The trial

in this matter for all defendants is continued from August 6, 2007, to the criminal term of court

beginning on November 5, 2007. Any objections to the continuance of the trial date must be filed

on or before June 15, 2007, specifying the grounds for objection and providing authority in support

of the grounds. 

DONE this 7th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 276 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-139476 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 17, 2008,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Heelys, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of Heelys, Inc. and subsidiaries' internal
control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Heelys, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas,
Texas
March 17, 2008

---



QuickLinks
PRIVATE LAW 107–5—NOV. 5, 2002

Private Law 107–5

107th Congress

An Act

For the relief of Anisha Goveas Foti.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ANISHA GOVEAS

FOTI.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of

section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Anisha Goveas

Foti shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for

adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for

permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of

an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment

of status to lawful permanent resident.

(b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Anisha Goveas Foti enters

the United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection

(c), she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully

and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status

under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of

the date of the enactment of this Act.

(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance

of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status

is filed with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of

the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.

Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent residence

to Anisha Goveas Foti, the Secretary of State shall instruct the

proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current or next following

fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made

available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable,

the total number of immigrant visas that are made available to

natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 202(e)

of such Act.

Approved November 5, 2002.

Applicability.

Nov. 5, 2002

[H.R. 2245]
Exhibit 32.1
------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Annual Report of Wentworth IV, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kevin R. Keating, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                       /s/ Kevin R. Keating
                                       ---------------------------
                                       Kevin R. Keating
                                       Principal Executive Officer
                                       Principal Financial Officer
                                       March 31, 2009




                                       37
31.104 Contracts with educational institutions.       This category includes all contracts and contract modifications for research and development, training, and other work performed by educational institutions (defined as institutions of higher educations in the OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200, subpart A, and 20 U.S.C. 1001).                                       (a) 						            The contracting officer shall incorporate the cost principles and procedures in subpart  31.3 by reference in cost-reimbursement contracts with educational institutions as the basis for-                                                         (1) 								                Determining reimbursable costs under the contracts and cost-reimbursement subcontracts thereunder performed by educational institutions;                                                            (2) 								                Negotiating indirect cost rates; and                                                            (3) 								                Settling costs of cost-reimbursement terminated contracts (see subpart  49.3 and 49.109-7).                                                                             (b) 						            The cost principles in this subpart are to be used as a guide in evaluating costs in connection with negotiating fixed-price contracts and termination settlements.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 31.1 - Applicability
CPSC Cautions Caregivers about Hidden Hazards for Babies on Adult Beds

From the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

Washington, D.C. 20207

Reports of more than 100 deaths from 1999-2001

000206

Just as the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has alerted parents and caregivers to the

hazards of soft bedding in cribs, it is now alerting them to the hidden hazards associated with placing

infants on adult beds. The CPSC has reports of more than 100 deaths of children under age 2, most from

suffocation, associated with features of adult beds. These deaths occurred from January 1, 1999 to

December 31, 2001 and involve an entrapment, a fall, or a situation in which bedding or the position of

the child was related to the death. Nearly all of the children, 98%, were babies under 1 year old.

Many parents and caregivers are unaware that there are hidden hazards when placing babies on adult beds.

Consumers often think that if an adult bed is pushed against a wall, or pillows are placed along the sides of

the bed, small babies will be safe as they sleep. However, CPSC data shows hidden hazards for babies on

adult beds.

SAFETY TIPS

· Wherever your baby sleeps should be as safe as possible.

Babies placed on adult beds risk suffocation from several

hidden hazards such as:

- Entrapment between the bed and wall,or between the

bed and another object,

- Entrapment involving the bed frame, headboard or

footboard,

- Falls from adult beds onto piles of clothing, plastic

bags, or other soft materials resulting in suffocation,

and

- Suffocation in soft bedding (such as pillows or thick

quilts and comforters).

· Always place the baby to sleep on his or her back, not on

its stomach.

· When using a crib, make sure it meets current safety

standards, has a firm, tight-fitting mattress and tight-fitting

bottom sheet.

· When using a portable crib or playpen, be sure to use

only the mattress or pad provided by the manufacturer.

Baby Doll Simulation

Entrapment between bed & wall

Entrapment between bed & object

Entrapment in footboard
§ 636.10 Modifications. ( a ) The participant and NRCS may modify a cost-share agreement if both parties agree to the modification. The WHIP plan of operations is revised in accordance with NRCS requirements, and the agreement is approved by the designated conservationist.
( b ) Any modifications made under this section must meet WHIP program objectives and must be in compliance with this part.
( c ) In the event implementation of a conservation activity fails through no fault of the participant, the State Conservationist may modify the cost-share agreement in order to issue payments to re-implement the activity, at the rates established in accordance with § 636.7, provided such payments do not exceed the payment limitation requirements as set forth in § 636.7.
( d ) Where circumstances beyond the participant's control or when it is in the public interest, such as matters of health or safety, the State Conservationist may independently or by mutual agreement with the parties modify or terminate the cost-share agreement as provided for in § 636.12.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CHIQULA LYNETTE WILSON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 4:21cv1-MW/CAS

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

Acting Commissioner,

Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 22, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s objections, 

ECF No. 23, and the Defendant’s response, ECF No. 24. Upon review of the filings 

and considering the record as a whole, this Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge 

that the ALJ’s decision was supported by substantial evidence. 

In so stating, this Court agrees with Plaintiff that a reviewing court cannot 

simply ignore an ALJ’s failure to state with particularity the weight given to different 

medical opinions and the reasons therefor. See ECF No. 23 at 3-4. However, that is 

not what occurred here. In this case, the ALJ stated with particularity the weight he 

assigned Dr. Dulay’s medical opinion (“not persuasive”) and the reasons therefor 

Case 4:21-cv-00001-MW-CAS Document 25 Filed 04/08/22 Page 1 of 2
2

(“[i]t includes extreme limits . . . that are not supported by the overall record”) and 

cited the portions of the record supporting this finding. Similarly, this Court agrees 

with the Magistrate Judge that substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s credibility 

determinations of Plaintiff. “In all events, there is no rigid requirement that the ALJ 

specifically refer to every piece of evidence in [his] decision, so long as the decision 

enables the reviewing court to conclude that the ALJ considered the claimant’s 

medical condition as a whole.” Lewen v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 605 F. App’x 967, 

968 (11th Cir. 2015) (citation and quotation marks omitted). 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation, ECF No. 22, is accepted and adopted, over 

the Plaintiff’s objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment 

stating, “The decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff’s application for DIB 

is AFFIRMED.” The Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on April 8, 2022.

s/Mark E. Walker ____

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:21-cv-00001-MW-CAS Document 25 Filed 04/08/22 Page 2 of 2