alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Eye Care centers of America, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 3, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jennifer L. Taylor, as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                  |  | 
|----------------- |  | 
|November 12, 2009 |  | 



| |  |                                                     
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Jennifer L. Taylor                              
| |  | Jennifer L. Taylor                                  
| |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EYE CARE
CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs CASE NO: 5:98cr8/LAC

CARLOS DEGLACE

_____________________________________/

ORDER

This case is before the Court upon remand from the Court of Appeals for the

Eleventh Circuit where it held that this Court had not articulated it had considered the

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors in reducing defendant’s sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(a)(2). The Court did not accept that a district judge would know the

requirements and apply them in determining an appropriate sentence.

So there be no further misunderstanding, this Court states for the record that

it did, in fact, consider the § 3553(a) factors as well as the advisory sentencing

guidelines, as it always does, in determining the extent of defendant’s sentence

reduction pursuant to § 3582(a)(2). And having found no aggravating or mitigating

circumstances not alreadyconsidered under the guidelines, this Court determined that

Case 5:98-cr-00008-LC-MD Document 536 Filed 02/20/09 Page 1 of 2
a sentence at the mid-range of the guideline recommendation was reasonable in this

case, and it still is today. 

Therefore, the sentence of 294 months imposed by this Court’s Order of 31

March, 2008 (doc 482) remains unchanged.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of February, 2009.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

 Senior United States District Judge

Case 5:98-cr-00008-LC-MD Document 536 Filed 02/20/09 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-140300) pertaining to the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan of Meruelo Maddux Properties, Inc. of our reports dated June 21, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Meruelo Maddux Properties, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Meruelo Maddux Properties, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLPLos Angeles, CaliforniaJune 21, 2010
§ 51.2752 U.S. No. 1 Virginia. “U.S. No. 1 Virginia” consists of shelled Virginia type peanut kernels of similar varietal characteristics which are whole and free from foreign material, damage and minor defects, and which will not pass through a screen having 15 ⁄ 64 × 1 inch openings. Unless otherwise specified, the peanuts in any lot shall average not more than 864 per pound. ( a ) In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, the following tolerances by weight, shall be permitted: ( 1 ) 1 percent for other varieties of peanuts;
( 2 ) 3 percent for sound peanuts which are split or broken;
( 3 ) 1.25 percent for damaged or unshelled peanuts;
( 4 ) 0.75 percent for minor defects: *Provided,* That in addition, any unused part of the tolerance for damaged or unshelled peanuts shall be allowed for minor defects;
( 5 ) 0.1 percent for foreign material; and,
( 6 ) 3 percent for sound, whole peanuts which will pass through the prescribed screen.
[24 FR 6671, Aug. 18, 1959. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981]
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:96-cr-00020-MP-AK

MICHAEL PHILLIP TELEMAQUE,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 500, Motion to Reduce Sentence. Previously, in

the order at Doc. 499, the Court had already denied a motion for reduction of sentence under the

crack amendments to the sentencing guidelines. Nothing in the motion at Doc. 504 justifies

revisiting the issue, and the motion is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2008

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:96-cr-00020-MW-GRJ Document 508 Filed 12/15/08 Page 1 of 1
| (1)   | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of Atheron Inc. for the year ended August 31,      2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended      August 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial      condition and results of operations of Atheron  Inc.. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/Susanna Hilario                                                              |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Susanna      Hilario                                                            |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
| Date:  | December      2, 2008                                                           |
§ 8.6 Authorization for use. ( a ) The Director of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture may grant authorization for use of the 4-H Club Name and Emblem: ( 1 ) For educational or informational uses which the Cooperative Extension Service deems to be in the best interests of the 4-H program and which can be properly controlled by the Cooperative Extension Service.
( 2 ) For services to youth which the Cooperative Extension Service determines it is not in a position itself to perform.
( b ) Authorizations, when issued, will be valid for specified purposes and periods of time only. Application forms for requesting authorization to use the 4-H Club Name and Emblem may be obtained from the Director of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250.
( c ) Granting an authorization to an individual, organization, or institution for a specific use does not preclude granting a similar authorization to another individual, organization, or institution for the same or a similar purpose.
( d ) All uses of the 4-H Club Name or Emblem shall be consistent with the educational purposes, character-building objectives, and dignity of the 4-H program and the 4-H Club Name or Emblem shall be given a position of prominence. It is not permissible to superimpose any letter, design, or object on the 4-H Club Emblem, or to materially alter its intended shape.
( e ) Specific authorization is not required to use the 4-H Club Name or Emblem in media such as newspapers, periodicals, and radio and television programs when such use is primarily for educational or informational purposes. Likewise, specific authorization is not required to use the 4-H Club Name or Emblem in those exhibits, displays, etc., which are designed primarily to pay tribute to or salute the 4-H program and are in keeping with the policies enunciated herein.
( f ) Authorization must be obtained for use of the 4-H Club Name or Emblem by other than representatives of the Cooperative Extension Services, the land-grant institutions, and the National 4-H Council in connection with contests and awards, books, booklets, charts, posters, and all other forms of publications; all calendars regardless of origin or use; theatrical and nontheatrical motion pictures; slides, slide films, and other visual and audio-visual materials; supplies (whether to be sold or provided without charge); and titles of persons.
( g ) Any authorization or permission for use of the 4-H Club Name and Emblem may be revoked at any time after written notice.
[50 FR 31582, Aug. 2, 1985, as amended at 60 FR 52293, Oct. 6, 1995; 76 FR 4803, Jan. 27, 2011]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Outdoor ChannelHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Perry T. Massie, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| /s/ Perry T. Massie     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| **Perry T. Massie**     |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| May 10, 2006            |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. andwill be retained by Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Maurice A. Krisel, Respondent, v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order dated January 23, 1969, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting a stay of the present action now pending as against the defendant Phillips Petroleum Company until the termination of the action against it in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and otherwise affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to respondent. The defendant Phillips has demonstrated the application of the recognized canons pertaining to a stay as embraced in CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 4) as also the independent power of this court to deal with parallel litigations apart from statute. (See *Dresdner*v. *Goldman Sachs Trading Corp.,*240 App. Div. 242, 244; *Pollak*v. *Long Is. Light. Co.,*246 App. Div. 765; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 3211.30, p. 32-76.) The defendant Phillips appeared in the prior Federal action in 1965 and is now the sole surviving defendant therein. The subsequent New York action was not instituted until October, 1968, involving substantially the same parties and issues, save the new defendant Alcoa, on an issue not germane to Phillips. In the Federal court action, pretrial procedures have been extensively pursued; there is and has been pending since July, 1968, a motion for summary judgment, which plaintiff admits would be dispositive of the New York action. Plaintiff’s attorney has offered to discontinue the Federal action if such a move would be in furtherance of the New York action, thus inferentially conceding the sameness of the two causes of *629action. All in all, the progression of two actions of such common identity against the same defendant in separate forums, is indefensible. Such a course would place an undue burden on Phillips and constitute a waste of judicial energies. (See *Greenwich Marine*v. *S. S. Alexandra,*339 F. 2d 901, 905.) Accordingly, the withholding of the requested stay as against the defendant Phillips in our courts was an improvident exercise of discretion. Concur ■—■ Capozzoli, J. P., McGivern, Nunez, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2902 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 3-Dodecyl-1-(2,2,6,6- 

tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)–2,5-pyrrolidinedione). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 3-Dodecyl1-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)–2,5-pyrrolidinedione). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 3-DODECYL-1-(2,2,6,6-TETRAMETHYL-4- 

4 PIPERIDINYL)–2,5-PYRROLIDINEDIONE). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.04.12 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 3-Dodecyl-1-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)–2,5- 

8 pyrrolidinedione) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 2902 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2888 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2888

  To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Lambda-Cyhalothrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Lambda-Cyhalothrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAMBDA-CYHALOTHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.09 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Lambda-Cyhalothrin) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER JON PERGROSSI,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20cv206-MW/GRJ

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,

ALL TREASURES ALWAYS VALUABLE,

Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Omnibus 

Order to Show Cause and Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 4, and has also 

reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation.1 ECF 

No. 6.

Plaintiff filed 33 cases over a four-day period, from August 17 through August 

20, 2020. These cases were assigned to three U. S. District Judges in the Northern 

District of Florida. The cases are frivolous. Understandably, the Magistrate Judge 

1 Plaintiff filed a document in Case No. 1:20cv181-MW/GRJ, ECF No. 6, which this Court has 

construed as an omnibus response to the Order to Show Cause and as objections to the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones, ECF No. 4.

Case 1:20-cv-00206-MW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 09/23/20 Page 1 of 2
2

found this extraordinary volume of frivolous cases merits the imposition of 

restrictions on future filings in order to preserve scarce judicial resources and protect 

the efficient administration of justice. While a close call, this Court will not restrict 

future filings unless Plaintiff continues to abuse the process. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted in part, over 

Plaintiff’s objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, 

“This case is DISMISSED without leave to amend as frivolous and/or for failure to 

state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

No restrictions are imposed on future filings unless Plaintiff continues to abuse the 

judicial process.” The Clerk shall also close the file. 

SO ORDERED on September 23, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00206-MW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 09/23/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 771.4 Eligibility requirements. ( a ) An eligible applicant must: ( 1 ) Meet all requirements prescribed by APHIS to qualify for cost-share grant funds as determined by APHIS, (FSA will accept the determination by APHIS as to an organization's qualification);
( 2 ) Have the appropriate charter and/or legal authority as a non-profit corporation or as a State organization specifically organized to operate the boll weevil eradication program in any State, biological, or geographic region of any State in which it operates;
( 3 ) Possess the legal authority to enter into contracts, including debt instruments;
( 4 ) Operate in an area in which producers have approved a referendum authorizing producer assessments and in which an active eradication or post-eradication program is underway or scheduled to begin no later than the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the application is submitted;
( 5 ) Have the legal authority to pledge producer assessments as security for loans from FSA.
( b ) Individual producers are not eligible for loans.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Centenary International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carlos Fabian De Sousa, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Carlos Fabian De
  SousaCarlos
      Fabian De SousaChief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      1, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The
foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.
§ 760.1312 Maintaining records. ( a ) Persons requesting benefits under this subpart must maintain records and accounts to document all eligibility requirements specified in this subpart. Such records and accounts must be retained for 3 years after the date of payment to the dairy producer under this subpart.
( b ) Destruction of the records after 3 years from the date of payment will be at the decision and risk of the party undertaking the destruction.
§ 784.6 Rate of payment and limitations on funding. ( a ) Subject to the availability of funds and to the proration provisions of § 784.7, payments for qualifying operations shall be $18 for each qualifying ewe lamb retained or purchased for breeding purposes.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jack L. Cohen, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered April 20, 1979, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, and conspiracy in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. The facts upon which the convictions were based have not been considered. Derek Elms, who testified for the prosecution, had been indicted for the same' crimes with which defendant was charged, and was named as a coconspirator in the indictment against defendant. As such, he was an accomplice as a matter of law (see *People v Korjus,*54 AD2d 720), so that his testimony had to be corroborated (see CPL 60.22), and the trial court erred in allowing the jury to decide whether he was an accomplice (see *People v Bell,*32 AD2d 781). An error such as this is necessarily harmful (see *People v Minarich,*46 NY2d 970; *People v Jenner,*29 NY2d 695), and requires a reversal. Damiani, J. P., O’Connor, Lazer and Rabin, JJ., concur.
52.241-3 Scope and Duration of Contract.       As prescribed in 41.501(c)(2), insert a clause substantially the same as the following:          Scope and Duration of Contract (Feb 1995)                                       (a) 						            For the period _______________________, [*insert period of service*] the Contractor agrees to furnish and the Government agrees to purchase _____________________ [*insert type of service*] utility service in accordance with the applicable tariff(s), rules, and regulations as approved by the applicable governing regulatory body and as set forth in the contract.                                          (b) 						            It is expressly understood that neither the Contractor nor the Government is under any obligation to continue any service under the terms and conditions of this contract beyond the expiration date.                                          (c) 						            The Contractor shall provide the Government with one complete set of rates, terms, and conditions of service which are in effect as of the date of this contract and any subsequently approved rates.                                          (d) 						            The Contractor shall be paid at the applicable rate(s) under the tariff and the Government shall be liable for the minimum monthly charge, if any, specified in this contract commencing with the period in which service is initially furnished and continuing for the term of this contract. Any minimum monthly charge specified in this contract shall be equitably prorated for the periods in which commencement and termination of this contract become effective.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.241 Utility Services Provisions and Clauses.