alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DOE Departmental Dir ectives Pr ogram Ty pes of Dir ectives

Policies establish high level expectations in the conduct of the Department’s mission impacting two or more Departmental elements. Policies do not contain requirements. However, Orders and Notices that flow from Policies must be consistent with them.
Orders establish management objectives and requirements and assign responsibilities for DOE Federal emplo ye es consistent with policy and regulations. Requirements must be unique to DOE and must avoid du

plicating information from other directives or an y existing legal source. Responsibilities must impact at least two Departmental elements. The requirements identify the results needed in the performance of a job or a subject matter area. Details on how to fulfill requirements can be appended or attached as appropriate. Orders may also establish intended requirements for contractors in the form of contractor requirements documents (CRDs).
Notices have the same effect as Orders but are issued in response t o Departmental matters requiring prompt action to establish short

- term management objectives. A Notice of this nature must be converted to or incorporated into an Order within 1 y ear of the effective date. An extension may

be granted through issuance of another Notice provided that work on converting the Notice to an Order is in progress or the Notice is being converted to a rule. A Notice may also establish intended requirements for contractors by attaching a CRD. Additionally , a Notice can be used to co mmunicate general information throughout the Department and may reference requirements from an existing directive. Notices of this nature are issued for immediate or short term use and also expire no later than 1 ye ar from issuance.
Manuals supplement othe r directives, laws, and regulations, or other requirements by providing more instructions or details on how the provisions of these directives or laws must be carried out throughout DOE. Manuals identify procedural requirements in more detail than Orders f or DOE Federal emplo ye es and intended requirements for contractors, which must be in the form of the CRD attached to the Manual. Note: Manuals will remain in effect until revised according to DOE O 251.1C and will be phased out over time as a result of thi s Order. When scheduled for renewal, they will be converted into appendices within Orders.
Guides provide acceptable, but not mandatory , means for complying with requirements of an Order or rule. Guides must not impose requirements but may quote requireme nts if the sources are adequatel y cited. Alternate methods may be used if it can be demonstrated that they provide equivalent or better level of performance. https://www.directives.doe.gov/directives/t ypes - of

- directives
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Logan County BancShares, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 

 
| Date: May  13, 2005 | /s/ Eddie  Canterbury  |                                                        |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                | Name:                       | Eddie  Canterbury                                      |
|                | Title:                      | Executive  Vice President and Chief Executive Officer  |
|                     |                             |                                                             |  |

 

----
§ 760.1608 Payment limitation and AGI. ( a ) Per loss year, a person or legal entity, other than a joint venture or general partnership, is eligible to receive, directly or indirectly payments of not more than $125,000.
( b ) The direct attribution provisions in § 760.1507 of this part apply for payment limitation as defined and used in this rule.
#### § 631.22 Access to operating unit.

Any authorized NRCS representative shall have the right to enter an operating unit for the purpose of ascertaining the accuracy of any representations made in a contract or leading up to a contract, and as to the performance of the terms and conditions of the contract. Access shall include the right to measure acreages, render technical assistance, and inspect any work undertaken under the contract.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DAVID RASHAUN HAMIL, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D 2 02 2

- 3328

[ May 23, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Martin County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432020CF001223A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. Solages

Jones, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, G ERBER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
 

______________________________________________________________ 

Page 22 is not included in this copy. 

Pages through are not included in this copy. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

__ __ Identity of product impurities. 

__ __ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

__ __ Description of quality control procedures. 

__ __ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

__ __ FIFRA registration data. 

__ __ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _ . 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

__ __ Internal deliberative information. 

__ __ Privileged attorney-client communication. 

__ __ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency. 

 
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
#### § 760.1909 Perjury.

In either applying for or participating in ERP Phase 2, or both, the producer is subject to laws against perjury and any resulting penalties and prosecution, including, but not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1621. If the producer willfully makes and represents as true any verbal or written declaration, certification, statement, or verification that the producer knows or believes not to be true, in the course of either applying for or participating in ERP Phase 2, or both, then the producer may be guilty of perjury and, except as otherwise provided by law, may be fined, imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both, regardless of whether the producer makes such verbal or written declaration, certification, statement, or verification within or without the United States.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 10-65]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10-65 with attached transmittal, and policy justification.

Dated: December 1, 2010.

Morgan F. Park,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 76419)          ( print page 76420)          ( print page 76421)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[FR Doc. 2010-30727 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TTI INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
NOVERMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                             256
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   256
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,597
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,950
<COMMON>                                        42,128
<OTHER-SE>                                   (133,419)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,529
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,730
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (78,630)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (78,630)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

AggressionAt Risk PersonsBehavior DisordersCommunity InfluenceEducational EnvironmentElementary Secondary EducationFamily EnvironmentInterventionPreventionProgram EffectivenessResilience (Personality)RiskStudent CharacteristicsViolence

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 15, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40725 Summary Calendar

ROBERT DANIEL KEYS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CV-100

-------------------- Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Robert Daniel Keys, Texas prisoner # 873144, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application which the district court dismissed as time-barred. This court denied Keys’s request for a certificate of appealability (COA) from the dismissal of that application. Keys subsequently filed in the district court a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to FED . R. C IV . P. 60(b)(1). When the district court denied that motion, Keys filed a motion for rehearing by a three-judge panel, which the districtNo. 05-40725 -2- court also denied. Keys now seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion for rehearing by a three-judge panel. Keys cites to no authority nor has any been found establishing his right to a three-judge panel rehearing of the denial of his Rule 60(b)(1) motion. As such, his motion was unauthorized. Keys thus has appealed from the denial of a meaningless, unauthorized motion. See United States v. Early , 27 3F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). Although the district court denied the motion on the merits, it should have denied the motion for lack of jurisdiction. Id. However, this court can and does affirm on the alternative basis. Id. Keys’s request for a COA is denied as unnecessary. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). Keys’s motions for the appointment of counsel and for an en banc consideration of his COA motion are also denied. See
F ED . R. APP . P. 35(a); 5 TH C IR . R. 35.6. COA DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; AFFIRMED; MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND EN BANC CONSIDERATION DENIED.
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 1-2 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 1-2 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 1-2 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 1-2 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 1-2 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 1-2 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 1-2 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 1-2 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 8 of 8
215.404-72 Modified weighted guidelines

method for nonprofit organizations other

than FFRDCs.

(a) Definition. As used in this subpart, a nonprofit organization is a business entity—

(1) That operates exclusively for charitable, scientific, or educational purposes;

(2) Whose earnings do not benefit any private shareholder or individual;

(3) Whose activities do not involve influencing legislation or political campaigning for any candidate

for public office; and

(4) That is exempted from Federal income taxation under section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code.

(b) For nonprofit organizations that are entities that have been identified by the Secretary of

Defense or a Secretary of a Department as receiving sustaining support on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis

from a particular DoD department or agency, compute a fee objective for covered actions using the

weighted guidelines method in 215.404-71 , with the following modifications:

(1) Modifications to performance risk (Blocks 21-23 of the DD Form 1547).

(i) If the contracting officer assigns a value from the standard designated range (see 215.404-71

-2(c)), reduce the fee objective by an amount equal to 1 percent of the costs in Block 20 of the DD

Form 1547. Show the net (reduced) amount on the DD Form 1547.

(ii) Do not assign a value from the technology incentive designated range.

(2) Modifications to contract type risk (Block 24 of the DD Form 1547). Use a designated range of –1

percent to 0 percent instead of the values in 215.404-71 -3. There is no normal value.

(c) For all other nonprofit organizations except FFRDCs, compute a fee objective for covered actions

using the weighted guidelines method in 215.404-71 , modified as described in paragraph (b)(1) of

this subsection.

Parent topic: 215.404 Proposal analysis.
225.7003-2 Restrictions.

(a) The following restrictions implement 10 U.S.C. 4863. Except as provided in 225.7003-3 —

(1) Do not acquire the following items, or any components of the following items, unless any

specialty metals contained in the items or components are melted or produced in the United States

(also see guidance at 225.7003-2 (a)):

(i) Aircraft.

(ii) Missile or space systems.

(iii) Ships.

(iv) Tank or automotive items.

(v) Weapon systems.

(vi) Ammunition.

(2) Do not acquire a specialty metal (e.g., raw stock, including bar, billet, slab, wire, plate, and

sheet; castings; and forgings) as an end item, unless the specialty metal is melted or produced in the

United States. This restriction applies to specialty metal acquired by a contractor for delivery to DoD

as an end item, in addition to specialty metal acquired by DoD directly from the entity that melted or

produced the specialty metal.

(b) For more information on specialty metals restrictions and reporting of noncompliances, see

https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/cp/ic/specialty-metals-restrictions.html .

Parent topic: 225.7003 Restrictions on acquisition of specialty metals.
Name and title of individual served (if not shown above). D

A person of suitable age and discretion then

residing in the defendant's usual place of abode.

U.S. Department of Justice PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN

United States Marshals Service See Instructions for "Service of Process by the U.S. Marshal"

on the reverse of this form

PLAINTIFF COURT CASE NUMBER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2:06cr169-WKW

DEFENDANT TYPE OF PROCESS

JAMES CALVIN TALLEY FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

SERVE NAME OF INDIVIDUAL. COMPANY, CORPORATION, ETC. TO SEVOR 'DEScRI*IOM OF 1PROPERTY TO SEIZE OR CONDEMN

I

$31,141.84 IN U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM MUTUAL SAVING CREDIT UNION ACCOUNT

AT • ADDRESS (Street or RFD, Apartment No., City, State, and ZIP Code)

do UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE

SEND NOTICE OF SERVICE TO REQUESTER AT NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW: Number of process to be served 1

JwiththisFOrm-285

Tommie Brown Hardwick Number of parties to be served

United States Attorney's Office in this case

Assistant United States Attorney

Post Office Box 197 Check for service on U.S.A.

Monigornery,Alabama36100197_________ _____

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR OTHER INFORMATION THAT WILL ASSIST IN EXPEDITING SERVICE (Include Business and Alternate Address, All

Telephone Numbers, and Estimated Times Available For Service)

Asset Identification No. 06-DEA-466449

Signature of Att of: I TELEPHONE NUMBER I DATE

PLAINTIFF I I

ortorreqiisting service on behalf

DEFENDANT (334) 223-7280 03/21/08

SPACE BELOW FOR USE OF U.S. MARSHAL ONLY - DO NOT WRITE BELOW TillS LINE

Date

number of process indicated.

I acknowledge receipt for the total Total Process District of Origin I District to Serve

(Sign only first USM 285 if more than

.

SigAuthzedUSMSDeputy or CI;erk -

oneUSM 285 is submitted) No._______ No ________ ______________________ __________

I hereby certify and return that I 0 have personally served," , have legal evidence of service, 0 have executed as shown in "Remarks", the process described on

the individual, company, corporation, etc. at the address sho4n above or on the individual, company, corporation, etc., shown at the address inserted below.

D I hereby certify and and retum that I am unable to locate the individual, company, corporation, etc., named above (See remarks below).

Address (complete only if different than shown above) Date of Service Time am

O8

9

re Deputy

Service Fee Total Mileage Charges Forwarding Fee Total Charges Advance Deposits Amount Owed to US Marshal or Amount or Refund

(including endeavors)

_____________

REMARKS: RETURNED AND FILED

c: ,1iRCTCL!tJ

PRIOR EDITIONS MAY n!ST. OF ALA. FORM USM 285 (Rev. 12/15/80) BEUSED '_) -' :1

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 605 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SCOTT ALLAN JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv579–WS/MAF

LT. J. SHULLER, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 14, mistakenly titled an “Order”) docketed May 25, 2021. The magistrate

judge recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to

prosecute, to comply with court orders, and to properly serve the defendants.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 14) is
Page 2 of 2

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint and this action are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice for failure to prosecute, to comply with court orders, and to properly

serve the defendants.

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment, stating: "All claims are dismissed

without prejudice."

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of June , 2021.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### In the Matter of Marion Helfant, Petitioner, v New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent which, after a hearing, revoked petitioner’s driver’s license. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. The determination is supported by substantial evidence. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Lazer and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
§ 761.405 Application. ( a ) A borrower requesting debt settlement must submit complete and accurate information from which the Agency can make a full determination of the borrower's financial circumstances and repayment ability. Except for the situations listed in § 761.404(b), each liable party, must submit the following: ( 1 ) One completed original debt settlement application on the applicable Agency form signed by all parties liable for the debt;
( 2 ) A current financial statement;
( 3 ) A cash flow projection for the next production or earnings period;
( 4 ) Verification of employment or other earned income, including verification of a nondebtor spouse's income which will be included as available to pay family living expenses;
( 5 ) Verification of assets including, but not limited to, cash, checking accounts, savings accounts, certificates of deposit, individual retirement accounts, retirement and pension funds, mutual funds, stocks, bonds, and accounts receivable;
( 6 ) Verification of debts exceeding an amount determined by the Agency;
( 7 ) Copies of complete Federal income tax returns for the previous 3 years; and
( 8 ) Any other items requested by the Agency to evaluate the debtor's financial condition.
( b ) [Reserved]
[85 FR 36691, June 17, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 43391, Aug. 9, 2021]