alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re AKIN’S ESTATE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

In the matter of the estate of Sarah Akin, deceased.

No opinion. Decree affirmed, with costs. Order filed. For opinion below, see 145 N. Y. Supp. 1105. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1103.
# EPA R eg . No

. 79630-1

Vol. 3EPA REGISTRTION FILE # 79630-1 Vol 3

Page is not included in this copy.

Pages **129** through **134** are not included in this copy.

**The material not included contains the following type of**
**information:**

_ __Identity of product inert ingredients

**.**
_____ Identity of product impurities.

Description of the product manufacturing process.

_____ Description of quality control procedures.

Identity of the source of product ingredients.

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information.

_____ A draft product label.

_ The product confidential statement of formula.

_____ Information about a pending registration action.

**X FIFRA registration data.** 

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______.

_____ The document is not responsive to the request.

Internal deliberative information.

_____ Attorney-Client work product.

Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the Agency.

_____Personal Privacy Information

The information not included is generally considered confidential by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request.

_________________________________________________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2541 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2541

  To suspend temporarily the duty on Quinoline, 6 ethoxy 1,2 dihydro 
                            2,2,4 trimethyl.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2006

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on Quinoline, 6 ethoxy 1,2 dihydro 
                            2,2,4 trimethyl.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. QUINOLINE, 6 ETHOXY 1,2 DIHYDRO 2,2,4 TRIMETHYL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.29.28      Quinoline, 6        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         ethoxy 1,2                                                         31/2009
                         dihydro 2,2,4
                         trimethyl (CAS
                         No. 91-53-2)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2933.49.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of KCAP Financial, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report), I, Dayl W. Pearson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 9, 2017

          

          By:/s/ Dayl W. PearsonDayl W. PearsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### State Division of Human Rights, on the Complaint of Gerald Johnson, Petitioner, v American Can Company, Respondent.

Determination unanimously confirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The Human Rights Appeal Board, without reaching the merits, dismissed petitioner’s appeal from the division’s order of no probable cause because the appeal board found the division delayed more than 180 days in investigating and determining his complaint of unlawful discrimination (see Executive Law, § 297, subd 2). All the parties to this proceeding concede, and we agree, that the statutory time limits are directory and not mandatory and that the appeal board erred in dismissing the appeal on these procedural grounds (see *Matter of Sarkisian Bros, v State Div. of Human Rights,*48 NY2d 816; *State Div. of Human Rights v Pennwalt Corp., Pharm. Div.,*66 AD2d 1006). Nevertheless, we have examined the merits and the contentions of the petitioner as the parties request and we confirm the division’s finding of no probable cause (see *Matter of Callaghan v State Div. of Human Rights,*72 AD2d 679). In view of the evidence in the record of petitioner’s unsatisfactory performance, respondent American Can Company was not guilty of unlawful discrimination in discharging him two weeks after he was hired. (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Moule, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000758256                  
<NAME>                        Radiation Disposal Systems, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         28
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 28
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          87,313
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9977495
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (87,285)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,619)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)
        


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RICHARD BAILEY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5999-LC-HTC

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on April 28,

2021 (ECF No. 15), recommending dismissal based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a

claim upon which relief may be requested. The parties were furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have

been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Case No. 3:20cv5999-LC-HTC

Case 3:20-cv-05999-LC-HTC Document 16 Filed 06/09/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 15) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A;

1915(e)(2)(B).

3. The clerk of court is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th

 day of June 2021.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv5999-LC-HTC

Case 3:20-cv-05999-LC-HTC Document 16 Filed 06/09/21 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 33.1**

** **

**LONG BEACH SECURITIES CORP.**

** **

**SERVICER’S REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

 

Long Beach Securities Corp. (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for theperiod from January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (the “Reporting Period”) of the Platform Transactions (as defined below) with the servicing criterion set forth in Item 1122(d)(3)(i)(C) of Regulation AB (12 CFR part 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(C)) (the“Applicable Servicing Criterion”) and no others**.**  The transactions covered by this Servicer’s Assessment are those securitizations of pools of mortgage loans that were completed on or after January 1, 2006 and prior to January 1,2007 for which the Asserting Party performed servicing functions set forth in Item 1122(d) and that included one or more classes of publicly offered securities registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the“Platform Transactions”).

 

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criterion for the Reporting Period, using the Applicable ServicingCriterion, and has concluded that it has complied in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criterion with respect to the Mortgage Loans. 

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Asserting Party’s assessment ofcompliance with the Applicable Servicing Criterion for the Reporting Period.

 

Dated:  February 22, 2007

 

LONG BEACH SECURITIES CORP.

 

 

By:   /s/ Douglas A. Potolsky  _______Name:  Douglas A. PotolskyTitle:    Senior Vice President
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Neurotech  Development  Corportion.
(the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Bernard Artz,  Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/Bernard Artz

   Bernard Artz
   Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
   February 12, 2003
# 216.603 Letter contracts.

- 216.603-2 Application. 
- 216.603-3 Limitations. 
- 216.603-4 Contract clauses. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 216.6 - TIME-AND-MATERIALS, LABOR-HOUR, AND LETTER CONTRACTS
211.002 Policy       All defense technology and acquisition programs in DoD are subject to the policies and procedures in DoDD 5000.01, The Defense Acquisition System, and DoDI 5000.02, Operation of the Adaptive Acquisition Framework.    **Parent topic:** Part 211 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
52.211-12 Liquidated Damages-Construction.

As prescribed in 11.503(b), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts:

Liquidated Damages-Construction (Sept 2000)

(a) If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the

Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of ____________

[Contracting Officer insert amount] for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or

accepted.

(b) If the Government terminates the Contractor’s right to proceed, liquidated damages will continue

to accrue until the work is completed. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of

repurchase under the Termination clause.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.211 [Reserved]
**EXHIBIT 32
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.**SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
George W. Hamlin, IV, President and Chief Executive Officer and Lawrence A. Heilbronner, Chief Financial Officer, of Canandaigua National Corporation (the "Company"), each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005, and that to the best of his knowledge:
 

(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Company.  
The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 
 
November 3, 2005
  
/s/ George W. Hamlin, IV
/s/ Lawrence A. Heilbronner
George W. Hamlin, IV
Lawrence A. Heilbronner
President and Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
 ********
§ 614.11 Mediation. ( a ) A participant who wishes to pursue mediation must file a request for mediation under this part with the official designated in the decision notice no later than 30 days after the date on which the decision notice was received. Participants in mediation are normally required to pay fees established by the mediation program.
( b ) A dispute will be meditated by a qualified mediator as defined at § 614.2(n).
( c ) The parties will have 30 days from the date of the first mediation session to reach a settlement agreement. This date can be extended upon agreement of the parties. The mediator will notify the State Conservationist whether the parties have reached an agreement.
( d ) Settlement agreement reached during, or as a result of, the mediation process must be in writing, signed by all parties to the mediation, and comply with the statutory and regulatory provisions and policies governing the program. In addition, the participant must waive all appeal and judicial rights as to the issues resolved by the settlement agreement.
( e ) At the outset of mediation, the parties must agree to mediate in good faith. NRCS demonstrates good faith in the mediation process by, among other things: ( 1 ) Designating an NRCS representative in the mediation;
( 2 ) Making pertinent records available for review and discussion during the mediation; and
( 3 ) To the extent the NRCS representative does not have authority to bind the agency, directing the NRCS representative to forward, in a timely manner, any written agreement proposed in mediation to the appropriate NRCS official for consideration.
( f ) *Mediator impartiality.* ( 1 ) No person may serve as mediator in an adverse program dispute who has previously served as an advocate or representative for any party in the mediation.
( 2 ) No person serving as mediator in an adverse program dispute may thereafter serve as an advocate for a participant in any other proceeding arising from or related to the mediated dispute including, without limitation, representation of a mediation participant before an administrative appeals entity of USDA or any other Federal agency.
( g ) *Confidentiality.* Mediation is a confidential process except for those limited exceptions permitted by the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act at 5 U.S.C. 574. As a condition of participation, the participants and any interested parties joining the mediation must agree to the confidentiality of the mediation process. The mediator will not testify in administrative or judicial proceedings concerning the issues discussed in mediation, nor submit any report or record of the mediation discussions, other than the mediation agreement or the mediation report, except as required by law.
| Updated 3/31/98**Healthy People 2000    Statistics and Surveillance**
No. 9. Data Challenges and Successes with Healthy People. February    1998, 8 pp. (PHS) 98-1237    124 KB **(This report can be viewed only with    Adobe Acrobat 3.0.)**No. 8. Health Status Indicator    Reports: "State of the Art." May 1996, 7 pp. (PHS) 96-1237    79 KB  No. 7. The CDC Assessment Initiative A Summary of    State Activities. October 1995. 12 pp. (PHS) 95-1237    119 KB  No. 6. Recommendations from Committee 22.1. January 1995, 4    pp. (PHS) 95-1236    61 KB     No. 5. Field Staff Placed. September 1993. 4pp. (PHS) 93-1236

No. 4. CDC Assessment Initiative Funds Seven States. Summer    1992. 7pp. (PHS) 93-1236

No. 3. Meet the Staff. Spring 1992. 4pp. (PHS) 92-1236

No. 2. NCHS Data Users Conference to Focus on the Future.    Winter 1991. 4pp. (PHS) 92-1236

No. 1. An Overview of NCHS Activities Related to Healthy    People 2000. Fall 1991. 4pp. (PHS) 92-1236 **[textline.htm]** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 31.2
**Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer**
I, Frederic T. Boyer, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of QualstarCorporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Paragraph (b) is omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 12, 2004   /S/ Frederic T. Boyer  Frederic T. Boyer, Chief Financial Officer
19
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2708 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide an enrollment priority 

for veterans, who are recipients of certain medals for valor, in health 

care services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 3, 2006 

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide an enrollment priority for veterans, who are recipients of certain 

medals for valor, in health care services provided by 

the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENROLLMENT PRIORITY FOR HEALTH CARE 

4 BENEFITS OF VETERANS WHO ARE RECIPI5 ENTS OF CERTAIN MEDALS AND AWARDS. 

6 Section 1705(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the fol8 lowing new paragraph (3): 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2708 IS

1 ‘‘(3) Veterans who— 

2 ‘‘(A) are former prisoners of war or were 

3 awarded the Purple Heart; 

4 ‘‘(B) were awarded— 

5 ‘‘(i) the medal of honor; 

6 ‘‘(ii) the distinguished-service cross, 

7 Navy cross, or Air Force cross; 

8 ‘‘(iii) the silver star; or 

9 ‘‘(iv) any other medal for valor or her10 oism accorded a position in the order of 

11 precedence of awards and decorations au12 thorized to be awarded to members of the 

13 Armed Forces that is equal to or higher 

14 than the order of precedence accorded to 

15 the silver star medal; 

16 ‘‘(C) have a service-connected disability 

17 rated 10 percent or 20 percent; or 

18 ‘‘(D) are described in subparagraphs (B) 

19 and (C) of section 1710(a)(2) of this title.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS