alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 442 (Rev. 11/11) Arrest Warrant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 for the

District of&ROXPELD

United States of America

)

)

)

)

)

)

v.

Case No.

Defendant

ARREST WARRANT

To: Any authorized law enforcement officer

YOU ARE COMMANDED to arrest and bring before a United States magistrate judge without unnecessary delay

(name of person to be arrested) ,

who is accused of an offense or violation based on the following document filed with the court:

u Indictment u Superseding Indictment u Information u Superseding Information u Complaint

u Probation Violation Petition u Supervised Release Violation Petition uViolation Notice u Order of the Court

This offense is briefly described as follows:

Date:

Issuing officer’s signature

City and state:

Printed name and title

Return

This warrant was received on (date) , and the person was arrested on (date)

at (city and state) .

Date:

Arresting officer’s signature

Printed name and title

;

:DVKLQJWRQ'&

Jesus Rivera

(AKA: JD Rivera, Jesus Delamora Rivera)

Jesus Rivera

18 USC § 1752(a)(1) Knowingly Entering or Remaining in any Restricted Building or Grounds Without Lawful Authority 

18 USC § 1752(a)(2) Knowingly, With Intent to Impede Government Business or Official Functions, Engaging in 

Disorderly Conduct on Capitol Grounds 

40 USC § 5104(e)(2)(D) Engaging in Disorderly or Disruptive Conduct on Capitol Buildings or Grounds 

40 USC § 5104(e)(2)(G) Parading, Demonstrating, or Picketing in the Capitol Buildings

01/19/2021

_Zia M. Faruqui, U.S. Magistrate Judge _

Case 3:21-mj-00003-EMT Document 1-2 Filed 01/20/21 Page 1 of 2
AO 442 (Rev. 11/11) Arrest Warrant (Page 2)

This second page contains personal identifiers provided for law-enforcement use only

and therefore should not be filed in court with the executed warrant unless under seal.

(Not for Public Disclosure)

Name of defendant/offender:

Known aliases:

Last known residence:

Prior addresses to which defendant/offender may still have ties:

Last known employment:

Last known telephone numbers:

Place of birth:

Date of birth:

Social Security number:

Height: Weight:

Sex: Race:

Hair: Eyes:

Scars, tattoos, other distinguishing marks:

History of violence, weapons, drug use:

Known family, friends, and other associates (name, relation, address, phone number):

FBI number:

Complete description of auto:

Date of last contact with pretrial services or probation officer (if applicable):

Investigative agency

,QYHVWLJDWLYHDJHQF\DGGUHVV

Name and telephone numbers (office and cell) of pretrial services or probation officer (if applicable):

Jesus Rivera

JD Rivera, Jesus Delamora Rivera

5110 W. Farfield Dr, Pensacola, FL 32506

819 Lucerne Ave, Pensacola, FL 32505

819 Lucerne Ave, Pensacola, FL 32505

California

1/11/1984

546794082

5'7''

Male

Brown Brown

Jessecah B. Rivera, Spouse, 5110 W. Fairfield Drive, Pensacola, FL 32506 Phone: 504-417-2112

2020 Volkswagon Tiguan S, Blue 2013 Nissan NV van, Gray 2014 Jeep Compass SUV

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Washington Field Office

Case 3:21-mj-00003-EMT Document 1-2 Filed 01/20/21 Page 2 of 2
§ 765.252 Lease of security. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 65042 , Aug. 8, 2024.
( a ) *Real estate surface leases.* The borrower must request prior approval to lease the surface of real estate security. The Agency will approve requests provided the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The lease will not adversely affect the Agency's security interest;
( 2 ) The term of consecutive leases for agricultural purposes does not exceed 3 years, or 5 years if the borrower and the lessee are related by blood or marriage. The term of surface leases for farm property no longer in use, such as old barns, or for nonfarm purposes, such as wind turbines, communication towers, or similar installations can be for any term;
( 3 ) The lease does not contain an option to purchase; and
( 4 ) The lease does not hinder the future operation or success of the farm, or, if the borrower has ceased to operate the farm, the requirements specified in § 765.253 are met. Leases for nonfarm enterprises, such as solar farms, which take significant acreage of the operation out of agriculture production are not authorized. Non-productive land may be considered for this type of lease; and.
( 5 ) The lease and any contracts or agreements in connection with the lease must be reviewed and approved by the Government.
( b ) *Mineral leases.* The borrower must request Agency consent to lease any mineral rights used as security for FLP loans. ( 1 ) For FO loans made from December 23, 1985, to February 7, 2014, and loans other than FO loans secured by real estate and made from December 23, 1985, to November 1, 2013, the value of the mineral rights must have been included in the original appraisal in order for the Agency to obtain a security interest in any oil, gas, and other mineral associated with the real estate security.
( 2 ) For all other loans not covered by paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the Agency will obtain a security interest in any oil, gas, and other mineral on or under the real estate pledged as collateral in accordance with the applicable security agreement, regardless of whether such minerals were included in the original appraisal.
( 3 ) The Agency may consent to a mineral lease if the proposed use of the leased rights will not adversely affect either: ( i ) The Agency's security interest; or
( ii ) Compliance with any applicable environmental requirements of part 799 of this chapter.
( 4 ) The term of the mineral lease is not limited.
( c ) *Lease of chattel security.* Lease of chattel security is not authorized.
( d ) *Lease proceeds.* Lease proceeds are considered normal income security and may be used in accordance with § 765.303.
( e ) *Lease of allotments.* ( 1 ) The Agency will not approve any crop allotment lease that will adversely affect its security interest in the allotment.
( 2 ) The borrower must assign all rental proceeds from an allotment lease to the Agency.
[72 FR 63309, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 78 FR 65531, Nov. 1, 2013; 79 FR 78694, Dec. 31, 2014; 81 FR 51284, Aug. 3, 2016; 86 FR 43392, Aug. 9, 2021]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:94cr03012-04LAC

KIRKLAND HOLLINS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on April 5, 2010 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 3/18/10 Doc.# 872

RESPONSES:

 NONE on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 8 day of

th

April, 2010, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) See Doc. 778.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nagmeldeen Azaz, Appellant.

Submitted October 15, 2007;

decided October 18, 2007

Reported below, 41 AD3d 610.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn W.L. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-2112-000]


Blue Creek Wind Farm, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

November 16, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Blue Creek Wind Farm, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is December 6, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d0b081f0e0223212423281e383d3d223f390d2b283f2e632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="52141700111d3c3e3b3c37012722223d202612343720317c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>, or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29440 Filed 11-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**State Plant Name** **2001-2012 Low Rolling**  **An nual**  **Av erage** **95th**

**percentile low rolling**  **annual average** **2001-2012**

**Av erage** **Percent**

**improvemen t using 2001-**  **2012 average and**  **low rolling annual**  **average Percent** 

**improvemen t using 95th**  **percentile and 2001-**  **2012 average** **Nameplate**

**Capacity (MW)** 

AR White Bluff 2026 2049 2175 6.85% 5.79% 900.0 CO Rawhide 1869 1877 2067 9.58% 9.19% 293.6 CO Craig 1919 1927 1982 3.18% 2.77% 534.8 FL Crystal River 1981 2004 2100 5.67% 4.57% 739.2 IA George Neal North1943 1968 2044 4.94% 3.72% 549.8 IA Ottumwa 2118 2147 2322 8.79% 7.54% 725.9 IL E D Edwards 2006 2088 2199 8.78% 5.05% 136.0 IN F B Culley 1880 1916 221415.09%13.46% 265.2 IN Cayuga 1736 1747 1878 7.56% 6.98% 531.0 IN Merom 1936 1961 2070 6.47% 5.27% 540.0 IN Gibson 1726 1736 1817 5.01% 4.46% 667.9 KY H L Spurlock 1732 1779 1894 8.55% 6.07% 357.6 KY Mill Creek 1654 1676 1794 7.80% 6.58% 355.5 KY Ghent 1840 1849 1934 4.86% 4.40% 556.5 LA Big Cajun 2 1956 1961 2126 8.00% 7.76% 619.0 MI Dan E Karn 1976 1989 2043 3.28% 2.64% 136.0 MO Rush Island 1705 1845 191010.73% 3.40% 621.0 MO Iatan 1940 1949 2152 9.85% 9.43% 726.0 MT Colstrip 2092 2140 2279 8.21% 6.10% 358.0 Navajo Four Corners 1752 1773 1862 5.91% 4.78% 818.1 NC Belews Creek 1677 1688 1765 4.99% 4.36% 1080.1 ND Milton R Young 2105 2126 2244 6.19% 5.26% 477.0 NE Sheldon 2091 2141 2323 9.99% 7.83% 108.8 NE Nebraska City 1911 1926 1982 3.58% 2.83% 651.6 NY Somerset Operating Co LLC 1740 1759 1845 5.69% 4.66% 655.1 OH Muskingum River1835 1840 1887 2.76% 2.49% 237.5 OH FirstEnergy WH Sammis 1723 1733 1854 7.07% 6.53% 190.4 OH Walter C Beckjord1763 1770 1945 9.36% 9.00% 244.8 OH J M Stuart 1773 1777 1919 7.61% 7.40% 610.2 OH Cardinal 1741 1758 1831 4.92% 3.99% 615.2 OH Miami Fort 1585 1650 189416.31%12.88% 557.1 PA PPL Brunner Island1538 1548 1641 6.28% 5.67% 405.0 PA Hatfields Ferry Power Station 1716 1794 1941 11.59% 7.57% 576.0 PA Keystone 1733 1740 1811 4.31% 3.92% 936.0 PA Keystone 1803 1809 1842 2.12% 1.79% 936.0 PA Conemaugh 1682 1707 1802 6.66% 5.27% 936.0 PA FirstEnergy Bruce Mansfield 1659 1687 1811 8.39% 6.85% 913.7 SC Cross 1737 1826 199813.06% 8.61% 590.9 TN Cumberland 1784 1815 1941 8.09% 6.49% 1300.0TX Harrington 1810 1849 219017.35%15.57% 360.0

TX Fayette Power Project1920 1937 2016 4.76% 3.92% 615.0 TX WA Parish 1877 1891 2015 6.85% 6.15% 734.1 TX Martin Lake 2092 2113 2183 4.17% 3.21% 793.2 TX J K Spruce 1921 1980 215710.94% 8.21% 878.0 VA Clinch River 1660 1692 1803 7.93% 6.16% 237.5 WV Mt Storm 1945 1954 2052 5.21% 4.78% 570.2 WV John E Amos 1773 1782 1879 5.64% 5.16% 1300.0 WY Jim Bridger 1956 2001 2119 7.69% 5.57% 577.9 WY Laramie River Station2107 2153 2265 6.98% 4.94% 570.0 

## AR Independence Unit One 2050 2058 2121 3.35% 2.97% 900.0 

## IL Powerton Unit Six1871 1923 218214.25%11.87% 892.8 

## IL Joppa Unit Two 1866 2040 211611.81% 3.59% 183.3



## AVERAGE1,8511,8822,0057.60%6.07% 597
Page 1 of 2 

Case No.: 3:20cv6010/LAC/EMT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 PENSACOLA DIVISION 

WILLIE LEE PEARSON, 

Inmate No. 197922, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv6010/LAC/EMT 

CENTORION COMPANY, et al., 

Defendants. 

 / 

ORDER

 The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on 

September 14, 2021 (ECF No. 9). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report 

and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of 

the timely filed objections. 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections 

thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 

 1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 9) 

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 

Case 3:20-cv-06010-LC-EMT Document 11 Filed 09/28/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 

Case No.: 3:20cv6010/LAC/EMT

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court. 

 3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of September, 2021. 

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-06010-LC-EMT Document 11 Filed 09/28/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 652.31 Policy.

In order to protect the public interest, it is the policy of NRCS to maintain certification of those technical service providers who act responsibly in the provision of technical service, including meeting NRCS standards and specifications when providing technical service to participants. This section, which provides for the decertification of technical service providers, is an appropriate means to implement this policy.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,240,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,275,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   193,000
<INVENTORY>                                 20,229,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,671,000
<PP&E>                                      15,899,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,040,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,322,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,680,000
<BONDS>                                      2,754,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,529,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,199,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,322,000
<SALES>                                     36,087,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,087,000
<CGS>                                       22,255,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,737,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               530,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             854,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,996,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   683,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,313,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,313,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>
§ 763.23 Terminating the guarantee. ( a ) The guarantee and the Agency's obligations will terminate at the earliest of the following circumstances: ( 1 ) Full payment of the land contract;
( 2 ) Agency payment to the seller of 3 annual installments plus property taxes and insurance, if applicable, under the prompt payment guarantee plan, if not repaid in full by the buyer. An Agency approved repayment plan will not constitute payment in full until such time as the entire amount due for the Agency approved repayment plan is paid in full;
( 3 ) Payment of a loss claim through the standard guarantee plan;
( 4 ) Sale of real estate without guarantee being properly assigned;
( 5 ) The seller terminates the land contract for reasons other than monetary default; or
( 6 ) If for any reason the land contract becomes null and void.
( b ) If none of the events in paragraph (a) of this section occur, the guarantee will automatically expire, without notice, 10 years from the effective date of the guarantee.
#### ISAACS et al., Appellants, v. BALDWIN et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 20, 1906.)

Action by Bendet Isaacs and others against Clarence D. Baldwin and another. A I. Elkus, for appellants. J. C. Bushby, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### SUGARMAN v. GOLDBERG.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 14, 1906.)

Vendos and Purchases—Incumbrances—Unexpired Lease.

A lease which does not terminate until after the time fixed in a contract of sale of the premises for the delivery of a deed thereof is an incumbrance.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 48, Cent Dig. Vendor and Purchaser, § 252.]

Appeal from City Court of New York.

Action by Joseph Sugarman against Samuel Goldberg. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before GILDERSLEEVE, DUGRO, and DOWLING, JJ.

Joseph Wilkenfeld, for appellant.

Tobias A. Keppler, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The surrender of the lease was from April 30th; the time for delivery of the deed, April 11th. Manifestly the lease was an incumbrance not provided for in the contract, and the plaintiff is entitled to recover. The case shows no prejudicial error.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:96-cr-00020-MP-AK

JOHN CALVIN EVERETT,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 452, Motion for Reconsideration of Doc. 441, 

Order denying two previous motions to reconsider. Mr. Everett's current motion for

reconsideration is yet another attempt to collaterally attack his sentence based on Apprendi. As

the Court has stated in each of the previous orders, Apprendi does not apply retroactively on

collateral review. In re Dean, 375 F.3d 1287 (11th Cir. 2004), citing McCoy v. United States,

266 F.3d 1245, 1256-58 (11th Cir. 2001) (holding that Apprendi is not retroactive to cases on

collateral review). Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration (doc. 452) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of April, 2006

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:96-cr-00020-MW-GRJ Document 453 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,287,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,353,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   315,000
<INVENTORY>                                 21,844,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,359,000
<PP&E>                                      18,252,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,636,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,218,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,446,000
<BONDS>                                      2,919,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,693,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,702,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,218,000
<SALES>                                     42,719,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,719,000
<CGS>                                       26,742,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               37,822,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (28,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             997,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,923,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,451,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,472,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,472,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
        

</TABLE>
#### § 65.160 Ground chicken.

*Ground chicken* means comminuted chicken of skeletal origin that is produced in conformance with all applicable Food Safety and Inspection Service labeling guidelines.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3666

_____________________________

DAVID LEE MASON, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Edward P. Nickinson, III, Judge.

June 4, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and ROBERTS and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Kevin P. Steiger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.