alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March 12, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual
Report of Heelys, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of Heelys, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-139476, effective December 19, 2006 and File No. 333-152929, effective
August 11, 2008).

/s/
Grant Thornton LLP

Dallas,
Texas
March 12, 2010

---



QuickLinks
SERVED JANUARY 25,2010 

r' "", ,-~ -1', 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS. 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 


DARBY AVIATION, 


Respondent. 


FAA DOCKET NO. CP08S00026 


(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 


DMS NO. FAA-2008-1192 


ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ORDER GRANTING 


MOTION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING 


For good cause shown, and with the consent of counsel for the Complainant, 

the Respondent's motion to postpone the hearingin this case is granted. 

The hearing will begin at 10:00 a.m. on March 15,2010 in the hearing room 

ofthe Department, Room EI2-300, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E., Washington, 

D.C. This is a change of venue for the hearing. 

Please allow for the time it will take counsel and the witnesses to pass 

through security at the Department's headquarters. . 

This is the second, and last, postponement of the hearing that will be 

granted. 

/~L?jL Isaatb.'Sfnkin 

Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP08S00026 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

UPDATED SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COpy 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlO001 

ONE COpy 

Deanna L. Weidner, Respondent's Counsel 

Anderson & Associates, LLC 

505 20th Street North 

Financial Center, Suite 1450 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

TEL: 205-324-1230 

FAX: 205-322-3890 

E-MAIL: dlweidner@davidbandersonlaw.com 

Raymond Veatch, Complainant's Counsel 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave. S.W. 

Washington DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-9676 

E-MAIL: Raymond. Veatch@faa.gov 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

E-MAIL: David.Benkin@dot.gov 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing DocketCJerk, AGC-430. 

I
Exhibit 10.3


 


May 11,
2009


 


Robert
A. Contreras


c/o
Deerfield Capital Management LLC


6250
North River Road, 9th Floor


Rosemont,
Illinois 60018


 


RE:  2009 Compensation Agreement


 


Dear
Robert:


 


Due
to your valuable contribution to Deerfield Capital Management LLC (the “Company”),
management and the board of directors of Deerfield Capital Corp. (“DFR”) have decided
to include you and a limited number of other employees in a retention program to
provide you with certain assurances regarding your cash compensation for the
Company’s 2009 fiscal year.  In
accordance with the foregoing, the Company hereby guarantees the following:


 


1.             Your annual salary
for 2009 will be no less than your annual salary for 2008 (which was $200,000)
and will be paid in cash pursuant to the Company’s standard payroll policies
and procedures;


 


2.             The Company will
pay you a bonus relating to the Company’s 2009 fiscal year of no less than $187,500
(your “Guaranteed 2009 Bonus”) in cash in 2010 in accordance with the Company’s
standard bonus payment policies and, in any event, no later than March 31,
2010, provided that you are employed by the Company on the date of such payment;
and


 


3.             If your employment
with the Company is terminated without “cause” (as determined by the DFR
Compensation Committee) prior to the payment of your Guaranteed 2009 Bonus as
set forth in 2 above, you will receive $250,000 in cash within 10 days of your
termination date.


 


The
payments set forth in paragraphs 1 through 3 above will be subject to standard
payroll withholding.  Nothing in paragraph
3 above shall be construed to limit your right to participate in any severance
program instituted by the Company with respect to employees whose employment is
terminated without cause and you shall be included in any such program.


 

















 


This
agreement is binding upon the Company and its successors and assigns.  You agree not to discuss or disclose any of
the terms of this agreement, except with or to your immediate family, attorney,
financial advisor or tax preparer or as required by law.  This agreement is not an agreement of
employment, and confers on you only those rights expressly granted herein.


 


Thank
you for your loyalty and hard work, and we look forward to building the
business together.


 


 


Sincerely,


 


	
  Deerfield
  Capital Management LLC

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  Jonathan W. Trutter

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
  Jonathan
  W. Trutter

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Chief
  Executive Officer

  	
   

  



 


 


	
  Acknowledged
  and Agreed:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  Robert A. Contreras

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
  Robert
  A. Contreras

  	
   

  
	
  Date:

  	
  May
  11, 2009
215.404-74 Fee requirements for cost-plus-award-fee contracts.       In developing a fee objective for cost-plus-award-fee contracts, the contracting officer shall—          (a)  Follow the guidance in FAR 16.405-2 and                 216.405-2             ;          (b)  Not use the weighted guidelines method or alternate structured approach;          (c)  Apply the offset policy in                 215.404-73             (b)(2) for facilities capital cost of money, i.e., reduce the base fee by the amount of facilities capital cost of money; and          (d)  Not complete a DD Form 1547.    **Parent topic:** 215.404 Proposal analysis.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3258

ROBERT J. SARHAN,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Respondent.

Samuel B. Reiner, II , Reiner & Reiner, P.A., of Miami, Florida, argued for petitioner.

Anuj Vohra , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigat ion Branch, Civil Division, United

States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued fo r respondent. With her on the

brief were Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, and Todd M. Hughes , Deputy Director. Of

counsel on the brief was Kenneth W. Bork , Attorney, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Office of

the General Counsel, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC.

Appealed from: Merit S ystems Protection BoardNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3258

ROBERT J. SARHAN,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Respondent.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

in CASE NO(S). AT0752070789-I-1

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 19, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0806 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-022-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

7.0 $ 595.00 $ 595.00 83 $49,385.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $49,385

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ARTURO ORTIZ,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-300-TKW/MJF

K. JONES, et al.,

Defendants.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 12). No objections were filed.1 Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed based on

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with court orders. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the case file.

1 The Report and Recommendation was returned by the Post Office as undeliverable even 

though it was mailed to Plaintiff’s address of record. See Doc. 13. Plaintiff’s failure to keep the 

Court apprised of his current address is an additional reason why this case should be dismissed.
2

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of May, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 30, 2016

NO. 03

- 15

- 00341

- CV

Antioch St. Johns Cemetery Company d/b/a American Memorial Park, Grand Prairie, Texas; Gerald Weatherall; and Beverly Randall

- Weatherall, Appellant s

v.

Texas Department of Banking Commissioner, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON A ND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on April 30, 2015. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was n o reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. The

appellant s shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
#### § 75.32 Who may become licensed inspector.

Any person nominated by a cooperating State and who is found to have the necessary qualifications may be licensed by the Director as an inspector to perform such duties of inspection as specified by the Memorandum of Understanding. Such a license shall bear the signature of an authorized employee of the Department. A licensed inspector shall perform duties pursuant to the regulations in accordance with instructions issued or approved by the Director.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Opinion filed March 5, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00575-CV

IN RE TURN2 SPECIALTY COMPANIES, LLC, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-09420

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Thursday, August 10, 2023, relator Turn2 Specialty Companies, LLC

filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §

22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. 

On February 14, 2024, relator filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the 

petition for writ of mandamus because the parties have settled their dispute in the 

underlying trial proceeding. We grant relator’s motion and dismiss the petition as 

moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Hassan, and Wilson.
EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.
                            FORM 10-Q - JUNE 29, 2002
                              FILED AUGUST 09, 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Eye Care Centers of America, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2002, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  pursuant to and to the extent required under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of
the  undersigned  officers  of  the  Company,  in  their  respective  capacities
indicated  below,  hereby  certify  as  follows:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  each  of  the  undersigned  officers  has  executed  this
certification  as  of  the  Ninth  day  of  August,  2002.


By:     /s/  David  E.  McComas
         ----------------------
        David  E.  McComas
        President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


By:     /s/  Alan  E.  Wiley
         -------------------
        Alan  E.  Wiley
        Executive  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer
#### § 58.19 Issuance of inspection or grading certificates.

An inspection or grading certificate shall be issued to cover a product inspected or graded in accordance with Instructions issued by the Administrator and shall be signed by an inspector or grader. This does not preclude an inspector or grader from granting a power of attorney to another person to sign in his stead, if such grant of power of attorney has been approved by the Administrator: *Provided,* That in all cases any such certificate shall be prepared in accordance with the facts set forth in the official memorandum defined in § 58.2(b): And provided further, that whenever a certificate is signed by a person under a power of attorney the certificate should so indicate. The signature of the holder of the power shall appear in conjunction with the name of the grader or inspector who personally graded or inspected the product.

[39 FR 986, Jan. 4, 1974. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# Date and Time:

Thursday, December 2, 2010, at 10 a.m.

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# Status:

This meeting will be open to the public.

*The Following Items were Withdrawn from the Agenda:*

Proposed Final Audit Report on the Washington State Democratic Central Committee

Proposed Final Audit Report on the Tennessee Republican Party Federal Election Account

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Commission Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

                        Judith Ingram, Press Officer,                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 694-1220.                    

Shawn Woodhead Werth,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-30736 Filed 12-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
#### § 51.1870 Fairly smooth.

*Fairly smooth* means that the tomato is not conspicuously ridged or rough.
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 5 of 5
# L_2014269DE.01000401.xml

| 10.9.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 269/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 269/4

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses Nr. 541/2014/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 16. April 2014 über die Schaffung eines Rahmens zur Unterstützung der Beobachtung und Verfolgung von Objekten im Weltraum

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 158 vom 27. Mai 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 158 vom 27. Mai 2014

Auf Seite 232, Überschrift von Artikel 7:

anstatt:

„Artikel 7

Beteiligung von Drittstaaten“

muss es heißen:

„Artikel 7

Beteiligung von Mitgliedstaaten“

.

---
52.223-5 Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information.       As prescribed in 23.1005, insert the following clause:          Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information (May 2011)                                       (a)                   *Definitions*. As used in this clause-                                *Toxic chemical* means a chemical or chemical category listed in 40 CFR372.65.                                          (b) 						            Federal facilities are required to comply with the provisions of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA) (42U.S. C.11001-11050), and the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (PPA) (42U.S. C.13101-13109).                                          (c) 						            The Contractor shall provide all information needed by the Federal facility to comply with the following:                                                         (1) 								                The emergency planning reporting requirements of Section 302 of EPCRA.                                                            (2) 								                The emergency notice requirements of Section 304 of EPCRA.                                                            (3) 								                The list of Material Safety Data Sheets, required by Section 311 of EPCRA.                                                            (4) 								                The emergency and hazardous chemical inventory forms of Section 312 of EPCRA.                                                            (5) 								                The toxic chemical release inventory of Section 313 of EPCRA, which includes the reduction and recycling information required by Section 6607 of PPA.                                                            (6) 								                The toxic chemical and hazardous substance release and use reduction goals of section 2(e) of Executive Order 13423 and of Executive Order 13514.                                                                    (End of clause)          *Alternate I*                (May 2011). As prescribed in 23.1005(b), add the following paragraph (c)(7) to the basic clause:             (c)(7) The environmental management system as described in section 3(b) of E.O. 13423 and 2(j) of E.O. 13514.                                       *Alternate II*                (May 2011). As prescribed in 23.1005(c), add the following paragraph (c)(7) to the basic clause. If Alternate I is also prescribed, renumber paragraph (c)(7) as paragraph (c)(8).             (c)(7) The facility compliance audits as described in section 3(c) of E.O. 13423.    **Parent topic:** 52.223 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Furia Organization, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Martin Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Martin Cohen
-------------------------
Martin Cohen
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Jim B. Terry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)    TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  JIM B. TERRY                                    |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jim  B. Terry                                        |
| *Chief Executive Officer*                            |
|                                                 |
| Date:     May 9,  2008 |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc. and will be retained byParticle Drilling Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----