alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000757545
<NAME> 84A.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         146,229
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  159,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               305,953
<PP&E>                                      18,223,253
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,025,066
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,504,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,457,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,504,140
<SALES>                                        290,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               293,480
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  300,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,739)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,739)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,739)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of Alliance Network Communications Holdings, Inc.., (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to each such officer’s knowledge, that:





(1)    The annual Report on form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 (“the Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 14, 2010
By:
/s/ Boris RubizhevskyBoris Rubizhevsky

Chief Executive Officer





Dated: May 14, 2010
By:
/s/ Jan E. ChasonJan E. Chason

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 51.779 Poorly colored.

*Poorly colored* means that not more than 25 percent of the surface may be of a solid dark green color.
#### § 70.12 Supervision.

All grading service shall be subject to supervision at all times by the responsible State supervisor, regional director, and national supervisor. Such service shall be rendered in accordance with instructions issued by the Administrator where the facilities and conditions are satisfactory for the conduct of the service and the requisite graders are available. Whenever the supervisor of a grader has evidence that such grader incorrectly graded a product, such supervisor shall take such action as is necessary to correct the grading and to cause any improper grademarks which appear on the product or containers thereof to be corrected prior to shipment of the product from the place of initial grading.
December 28, 2014 

Docket Management Facility 

Alan F. Wright 

449 S. Skyview Drive 

Kalamazoo, Michigan 49009 

e-mail: saraawright@aol.com 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Comment on Docket No. FAA-201 0-0134 

Summary Notice No. PE-2014-139 

To Whom It May Concern: 

. \ :.. ·,, , ... 

As a pilot with 53 years experience and 7,000 hours, I would like to comment on a petition for 

exemption submitted by Al's Aerial Spraying, LLC. The exemption asks for relief from 14 CFR 

137.51(b) (4) (i) which requires that no person operating a single engine airplane, takeoff a 

loaded aircraft, or make a turnaround over a congested area. The petitioner, Al's Aerial 

Spraying, LLC asks to be allowed to use single engine turboprop powered Air Tractor aircraft to 

takeoff and make turnarounds over congested areas in a loaded configuration. 

I strongly support this petition. Documentation was submitted with the petition and is in the 

docket outlining the need for this petition. This documentation was largely FAA publications, 

Pratt and Whitney Data and Advisory Circulars that prove that the single engine turboprop 

airplane is safer that a multi-engine airplane in this flight regime. 

The Federal Aviation Regulations pertaining to Agriculture Aircraft Operations were written in 

the 1960's, when the turboprop engine was a relatively new technology. These regulations do 

not reflect the significant evolution of purpose builit agricultural application aircraft, turbo-prop 

engines, agricultural aviation technology, or enhanced pilot training. 

It is my reasoned opinion that granting this petition will not adversely affect safety of flight and 

will in fact provide an even higher level of safety. 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this petition for exemption. 

4-~~·"' -_--.-~--

Alan Wright 

A TP #1543005
52.223-14 Acquisition of EPEAT®-Registered Televisions.       As prescribed in 23.705(c)(1), insert the following clause:          Acquisition of EPEAT®-Registered Televisions (Jun 2014)                                       (a) 						            Definitions. As used in this clause-                *Television* or "TV" means a commercially available electronic product designed primarily for the reception and display of audiovisual signals received from terrestrial, cable, satellite, Internet Protocol TV (IPTV), or other digital or analog sources. A TV consists of a tuner/receiver and a display encased in a single enclosure. The product usually relies upon a cathode-ray tube (CRT), liquid crystal display (LCD), plasma display, or other display technology. Televisions with computer capability (e.g., computer input port) may be considered to be a TV as long as they are marketed and sold to consumers primarily as televisions.                                          (b) 						            Under this contract, the Contractor shall deliver, furnish for Government use, or furnish for Contractor use at a Federally controlled facility, only televisions that, at the time of submission of proposals and at the time of award, were EPEAT® bronze-registered or higher.                                          (c) 						            For information about EPEAT®, see www.epa.gov/epeat/.                                 (End of clause)          Alternate I (*Jun* 2014). As prescribed in 23.705(d)(2), substitute the following paragraph (b) for paragraph (b) of the basic clause:             (b) Under this contract, the Contractor shall deliver, furnish for Government use, or furnish for Contractor use at a Federally controlled facility, only televisions that, at the time of submission of proposals and at the time of award, were EPEAT® silver-registered or gold-registered.    **Parent topic:** 52.223 [Reserved]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL TIERNEY,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5738/LC/ZCB

OFFICER J HATTAWAY, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on December 9,

2022. (Doc. 68). The Court furnished the plaintiff a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 68) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-05738-LC-ZCB Document 74 Filed 01/09/23 Page 1 of 2
2

2. Plaintiff is found to have exhausted administrative remedies.

3. The Clerk shall return the case to the Magistrate Judge for further 

prodeedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of January, 2023.

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier 

Case 3:20-cv-05738-LC-ZCB Document 74 Filed 01/09/23 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:02cr28-SPM

HERNANDEZ MARTINEZ GIBSON,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant Hernandez Martinez

Gibson’s motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) and the

retroactive crack cocaine amendment (Amendments 706 and 711).

Upon review, the Court finds that Defendant is not entitled to a sentence

reduction. An application of the amendment results in no change to Defendant’s

guideline range because of the career offender enhancement, which sets

Defendant’s offense level at 34. With a 3 point reduction for acceptance of

responsibility, Defendant’s total offense level remains at level 31, and his

guideline range remains 108-135 months as originally calculated. Accordingly, it

is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion for reduction of sentence

Case 4:02-cr-00028-SPM Document 47 Filed 04/15/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

CASE NO.: 4:02cr28-SPM

(doc. 46) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of April, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cr-00028-SPM Document 47 Filed 04/15/08 Page 2 of 2
§ 764.235 Security requirements. ( a ) The loan must be secured in accordance with requirements established in §§ 764.103 through 764.106.
( b ) Loans to purchase chattels will be secured by a first lien on chattels purchased with loan funds. Real estate may be taken as additional security if needed.
( c ) Loans of $25,000 of less for real estate purposes will be secured in the following order of priority: ( 1 ) By a lien on chattels determined acceptable by the Agency, and then
( 2 ) By a lien on real estate, if available and necessary. When real estate is taken as security a certification of ownership in real estate is required. Certification of ownership may be in the form of an affidavit that is signed by the applicant, names all of the record owners of the real estate in question and lists the balances due on all known debts against the real estate. Whenever the Agency is uncertain of the record owner or debts against the real estate security, a tile search is required.
( d ) Loans greater than $25,000 for real estate purposes will be secured in the following order of priority: ( 1 ) By a lien on real estate, if available, and then
( 2 ) By a lien on chattels, if needed and determined acceptable by the Agency.
( e ) For loans greater than $25,000 title clearance is required when real estate is taken as security.
[77 FR 15938, Mar. 19, 2012]
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-140300) pertaining to the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan of Meruelo Maddux Properties, Inc. and Subsidiary of our report dated March 29, 2007 with respect to the combined financial statements and schedule of
Meruelo Maddux Properties Predecessor, and our report dated March 29, 2007 with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Meruelo Maddux Properties, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2006, both included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                        |  |                      
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                        |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|Los Angeles, California |  |                      
|March 30, 2007          |  |
§ 66.100 General. ( a ) *Responsibility for disclosure.* ( 1 ) For a food that is packaged prior to receipt by a retailer, the food manufacturer or importer is responsible for ensuring that the food label bears a bioengineered food disclosure in accordance with this part.
( 2 ) If a retailer packages a food or sells a food in bulk, that retailer is responsible for ensuring that the food bears a bioengineered food disclosure in accordance with this part.
( b ) *Type of disclosure.* If a food must bear a bioengineered food disclosure under this part, the disclosure must be in one of the forms described in this paragraph (b), except as provided in §§ 66.110 and 66.112. ( 1 ) A text disclosure in accordance with § 66.102.
( 2 ) A symbol disclosure in accordance with § 66.104.
( 3 ) An electronic or digital link disclosure in accordance with § 66.106.
( 4 ) A text message disclosure in accordance with § 66.108.
( c ) *Appearance of disclosure.* The required disclosure must be of sufficient size and clarity to appear prominently and conspicuously on the label, making it likely to be read and understood by the consumer under ordinary shopping conditions.
( d ) *Placement of the disclosure.* Except as provided in § 66.114 for bulk food, the disclosure must be placed on the label in one of the manners described in this paragraph (d). ( 1 ) The disclosure is placed in the information panel directly adjacent to the statement identifying the name and location of the handler, distributor, packer, manufacturer, importer, or any statement disclosing similar information.
( 2 ) The disclosure is placed in the principal display panel.
( 3 ) The disclosure is placed in an alternate panel likely to be seen by a consumer under ordinary shopping conditions if there is insufficient space to place the disclosure on the information panel or the principal display panel.
( e ) *Uniform Resource Locator (URL).* Except for disclosures made by small manufacturers and for disclosures on very small packages, a bioengineered food disclosure may not include an internet website URL that is not embedded in an electronic or digital link.
#### § 621.43 Interstate compacts and commissions.

As assigned, an NRCS State Conservationist is the USDA point of contact for governing bodies of interstate compacts and commissions concerned with the conservation, development, and proper use of water, soil, and related resources.
#### In the Matter of David Ballentine, Appellant, v David R. Harris, as Superintendent of Green Haven Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

In two consolidated proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 to vacate a judgment of conviction, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, July 6, 1979, which dismissed his petitions. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. A proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 will not lie for the redress of an error committed upon the trial of a criminal prosecution (CPLR 7801, subd 2). The instant proceedings are lacking in merit and are but attempts to invoke the extraordinary remedy provided by CPLR article 78 as a substitute for a further appeal (see *Matter of Burton v Marshall,*20 NY2d 797; *Matter of Bloeth v Marks,*20 AD2d 372; *Matter of Ferraro v Supreme Ct., County of Queens,*36 AD2d 841; *Matter of Attica Bros. [Barbatunje] v Additional*
      *852
      *Term of Supreme Ct., County of Erie,*45 AD2d 10). Gibbons, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### § 58.427 Paraffin tanks.

The metal tank should be adequate in size, have wood rather than metal racks to support the cheese, have heat controls and an indicating thermometer. The cheese wax shall be kept clean.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Hector Patron Costas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
              Hector Patron CostasHector
                Patron Costas
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              November
                5, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being
      filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure
      document.




-1-
**CERTIFICATIONS**
  I,
        Andrew
        Leszczynski, certify that:
  1.
        I have
        reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
        be
        filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SACO
        I
        Trust 2006-8 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
  2.
        Based
        on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do
        not
        contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
        fact
        necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
        which
        such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
        by
        this report;
  3.
        Based
        on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
        required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report
        is
        included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
  4.
        I am
        responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based
        on
        my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer
        compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
        AB,
        and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers
        have
        fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements; and
  5.
        All of
        the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
        securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
        with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
        in
        this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
        Rules
        13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except
        as
        otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
        described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
        10-K.
  In
        giving
        the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
        to me
        by the following unaffiliated parties: EMC Mortgage Corporation, as servicer;
        LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc., as vendor; American Security Insurance
        Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and Safeco Financial Institution
        Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc.), each as vendor; GMAC Mortgage,
        LLC, as servicer; and GMAC Bank, as vendor.
  Date:
        March 29, 2007
  LaSalle
        Bank National Association, as Master Servicer
  /s/
        Andrew Leszczynski
 Andrew
        Leszczynski
 First
        Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on December 3, 2010 at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.

The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:

The Commission will consider a recommendation to propose joint rules with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission relating to the definitions of “Swap Dealer,” “Security-Based Swap Dealer,” “Major Swap Participant,” Major Security-Based Swap Participant,” and “Eligible Contract Participant.”

Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: November 30, 2010.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-30407 Filed 11-30-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### § 51.650 Very serious damage.

*Very serious damage* means any specific defect described in Table 1 to § 51.652; or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which very seriously detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the fruit.

[85 FR 68424, Oct. 29, 2020]