alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2746 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2746

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphinic acid,
diethyl-, aluminum salt along with synergists and encapsulating agents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2006

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphinic acid,
diethyl-, aluminum salt along with synergists and encapsulating agents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXOLIT OP 1312.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.09.03      Phosphinic acid,     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        diethyl-, aluminum                                                  31/2009
                        salt along with
                        synergists and
                        encapsulating
                        agents (provided
                        for in subheading
                        3824.90.91).......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sopac Cellular Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ezra E. Ezra, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
19th day of November, 2007.


/s/ Ezra E. Ezra
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BOBBIE BOLTON
Plaintiff,

Vv. CIVIL DIVISION
CASE NO. 4:03CV307-RH/WCS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and
CORRECTIONS OFFICER JEFFREY LINTON,
Defendant.

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SERVING FIRST INTERROGATORIES,
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION AND FOR ADMISSIONS

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff, through the undersigned attorney,
pursuant to the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure, now serves on Defendant(s):

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
1. Interrogatories,
2. Requests for Production, and

3. Requests for Admissions

| CERTIFY a true copy hereof was sent by [] hand [_] fax [mail on 2/ite/o% to:

Robert Stinson, Esq.
U.S. Attomey's Office
111 North Adams Street, Ste. 400

Tallahassee, Florida 32301-7717 hur, (nek.

JAMES)V. COOK TM~
orida’ Bar Number 0966843
West Jefferson Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32301
(850) 222-8080; 561-0836 fax

Orbis

nk

U.S. UIS TCT.
NORTHERH DIST. FLA.
TARE AY aan

cu FEB 18 PK 1: 08

FILED
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.38
FIFTH AMENDMENT
TO THE
ALBEMARLE CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


In accordance with Section 12.1 of the Albemarle Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2013 (the "Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1.Effective December 1, 2016, the parenthetical language in subparagraph 2 of Section 12.2(b) of the Plan is amended to read as follows-- "(as defined in Appendix A hereto or as described in the last paragraph of this Section 12.2)."
2.Effective December 1, 2016, Section 12.2 of the Plan is further amended to add the following paragraph at the end thereof: 
"For purposes of subparagraph 2 of Section 12.2(b), in the event of a scale of all of the stock of a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company which shall constitute a qualifying Change in Control under Section 409A, a termination and liquidation of the Plan shall automatically occur with respect to all Plan Participants who experience such Change in Control event.  This paragraph shall apply to a qualifying Change in Control that occurs on or after December 1, 2016."
3.The provisions of this Fifth Amendment shall be effective as of December 1, 2016.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation by its duly authorized officer has caused these presents to be signed this 13th day of March, 2017.
ALBEMARLE CORPORATION
	
		
	By:
	/s/ Karen G. Narwold
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

VFS LEASING CO., )

)

PLAINTIFF, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:06CV638-SRW

VS. )

)

G. F. KELLY, INC d/b/a KELLY )

TRUCKING; and GUY KELLY, ) 

)

DEFENDANTS. )

MOTION TO STRIKE DECLARATIONS

 

Come now the Defendants G. F. Kelly, Inc. d/b/a Kelly Trucking and Guy Kelly and move

the court to strike the Declarations of Michael J. Cox and Keith Weachter filed by plaintiff with its 

Evidentiary Submission in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and in support 

of its Motion to Strike filed on April 30, 2007. As grounds for this motion, Defendants show the 

following:

 1. The declarations contain expert testimony and opinions. Neither Cox nor Weachter 

were identified as experts by the deadline of January 29, 2007 as set out in the Uniform Scheduling 

Order issued by the Court. The only expert timely identified by plaintiff is Kevin Miller. It would

greatly prejudice the defendants if plaintiff is allowed to use additional experts that were not timely 

identified.

2. The declarations contain testimony that comments on testimony and qualifications 

of other witnesses. Such testimony is inadmissible and should be stricken.

. 

 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

 /s/ James H. Starnes 

 James H. Starnes

 Attorney for Defendants

OF COUNSEL:

P. O. Box 590003

Birmingham, AL 35259-0003

(205) 320-0800

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 32 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have the foregoing pleading electronically using the CM/ECF system 

which will electronically serve a copy of same on all counsel of record on this the 2nd day of May,

2007 as follows:

David B. Hall

BAKER DONALDSON 

420 North 20th Street, Suite 1600

Birmingham, AL 35203

 

/s/ James H. Starnes 

 OF COUNSEL

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 32 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,344
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,050
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     11,423
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           9,637
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             9,596
<LOANS>                                         66,427
<ALLOWANCE>                                        676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,361
<DEPOSITS>                                      87,930
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                653
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,274
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  99,361
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,713
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  515
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   249
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,477
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,413
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,421
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,056
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       20
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,468
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    983
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         655
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.83
<LOANS-NON>                                        801
<LOANS-PAST>                                       485
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   662
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        4
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  676
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               676
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

CLARENCE WATERS, AIS # 132116, ) 

 ) 

 ) 

Petitioner, ) 

 ) 

VS. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 

 ) 2:06-CV-650-MEF 

 ) 

KENNETH JONES, et al., ) 

 ) 

Respondents. ) 

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME 

IN WHICH TO RESPOND 

 COME NOW the Respondents in the above-styled cause, requesting an 

additional fourteen days in which to respond to this Court’s March 7, 2008 Order 

to Show Cause. As grounds, Respondents would show the Court the following: 

1) Documentation of one of the prior felony convictions (Rape I) is in hand, 

and ready to be submitted. However, Respondents are still in the process 

of obtaining the documentation on the other prior conviction (Escape II). 

2) Furthermore, the undersigned will be out-of-state during the period 

Sunday, March 9 through Wednesday, March 12, 2008 and, for that 

reason, unable to submit the documentation requested by the March 12, 

2008 deadline. 

Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 34 Filed 03/07/2008 Page 1 of 3
2

 WHEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing reasons, Respondents 

request that the Court grant this request for 14-days additional time in which to 

respond in this case, making said response due on or before March 26, 2008. 

 I am, this date, mailing a copy of this request for an extension of time to the 

Petitioner. 

Respectfully submitted, 

TROY KING (KIN047) 

Attorney General 

By: 

/s/ Stephen N. Dodd

STEPHEN N. DODD 

Assistant Attorney General 

ID #ASB-6492-D65S 

Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 34 Filed 03/07/2008 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 7th day of March, 2008, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, and I hereby 

certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the document to the 

following non-CM/ECF participants: Clarence Waters, AIS #132116, Donaldson 

Correctional Facility, 100 Warrior Lane, Bessemer, AL 35023-7299. 

 

s/ Stephen N. Dodd 

 STEPHEN N. DODD (ASB-6492-D65-S) 

Assistant Attorney General

Attorney for Respondents 

Alabama Attorney General’s Office 

11 South Union Street 

Montgomery, AL 36130 

Telephone: 334-242-7378 

Fax: 334-242-2848 

E-mail: sdodd@ago.state.al.us 

ADDRESS OF COUNSEL: 

Office of the Attorney General 

Criminal Appeals Division 

11 South Union Street 

Montgomery, AL 36130 

(334) 242-7300 

390193/98801-001

Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 34 Filed 03/07/2008 Page 3 of 3
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 1:00cr15-SPM

WILLIAM H. BLACK,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL APPROVAL OF RELEASE PLAN

Pending before the Court is Defendant William H. Black’s pro se

emergency motion (doc. 1226) for the Court to compel approval of his release

plan. Defendant Black’s plan calls for him to be designated to a community

corrections center in Irving, Texas, as part of the pre-release component of his

sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c). It also calls for his release in the Northern

District of Texas to live with his wife, Carla J. Harris, when he begins his term of

supervised release. 

 The Bureau of Prisons and the probation offices operate through a

memorandum of understanding whereby they “agree[] to work closely on release

planning to ensure that offenders have a smooth transition from prison to the

community, thereby increasing the likelihood of a successful supervision

experience.” Memorandum of Understanding Between the Federal Bureau of

Case 1:00-cr-00015-MW-GRJ Document 1228 Filed 02/05/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1

 A copy of the memorandum is included as Attachment B to the Bureau

of Prisons Policy Statement 5321.07.

CASE NO.: 1:00cr15-SPM

Prisons and the Probation and Pretrial Services Division of the Administrative

Office of the United States Courts Regarding Inmate Release Planning.1

According to the understanding, the Bureau of Prisons works with each prisoner

to come up with a release plan, which is then submitted for approval to the

probation office in the district of release. Id. “When a reasonable plan can be

verified, the plan should be approved.” Id.

This Court does not have jurisdiction to review the Bureau of Prisons’

designation of Defendant Black to a particular community corrections center. 18

U.S.C. § 3625. The Bureau of Prisons’ decision on that matter is a discretionary

activity that is not subject to judicial review. See Eaton v. United States, 178

F.3d 902, 903-04 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Fuller, 211 F.Supp. 204, 205

(D. Me. 2002). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant Black’s motion to compel

approval of his release plan (doc. 1226) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of February, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 1:00-cr-00015-MW-GRJ Document 1228 Filed 02/05/08 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 12 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 58.419 Curd mill and miscellaneous equipment.

Knives, hand rakes, shovels, scoops, paddles, strainers, and miscellaneous equipment shall be stainless steel or of material approved in the 3-A Sanitary Standards for Plastic and Rubber-like Material. The product contact surfaces of the curd mill should be of stainless steel. All pieces of equipment shall be so constructed that they can be kept clean and free from rough or sharp edges which might scratch the equipment or remove metal particles. The wires in the curd knives shall be stainless steel, kept tight and replaced when necessary.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19E0061. CHRISTOPHER M. HUNT v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST

COMPANY AMERICAS.

Upon consideration of the Emergency Verified Motion for Temporary

Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction filed by Christopher M. Hunt, said

motion is hereby DENIED. Court of Appeals Rule 40.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

June 27, 2019

06/27/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                           1,575
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                       559
<INVENTORY>                                     24,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,008
<PP&E>                                         129,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 214,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,589
<BONDS>                                        232,686
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     34,959
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                   (103,120)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   214,640
<SALES>                                        143,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,847
<CGS>                                           47,723
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,285
<INCOME-TAX>                                       392
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,893
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          491
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,402
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 51.757 U.S. No. 2. “U.S. No. 2” consists of grapefruit which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Discoloration: Not more than one-half of the surface, in the aggregate, may be affected by discoloration. (See § 51.770.);
( 2 ) Fairly firm;
( 3 ) Mature;
( 4 ) Similar varietal characteristics;
( 5 ) Slightly colored;
( 6 ) Not more than slightly misshapen; and,
( 7 ) Not more than slightly rough texture.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Decay;
( 2 ) Unhealed skin breaks; and,
( 3 ) Wormy fruit.
( c ) Free from serious damage caused by: ( 1 ) Ammoniation;
( 2 ) Bruises;
( 3 ) Buckskin;
( 4 ) Caked melanose;
( 5 ) Dirt or other foreign material;
( 6 ) Disease;
( 7 ) Dryness or mushy condition;
( 8 ) Green spots;
( 9 ) Hail;
( 10 ) Insects;
( 11 ) Oil spots;
( 12 ) Scab;
( 13 ) Scale;
( 14 ) Scars;
( 15 ) Skin breakdown;
( 16 ) Sprayburn;
( 17 ) Sprouting;
( 18 ) Sunburn;
( 19 ) Thorn scratches; and,
( 20 ) Other means.
( d ) For tolerances see § 51.760.
§ 760.1601 Administration. ( a ) The On-Farm Storage Loss Program will be administered under the general supervision of the Executive Vice President, CCC and will be carried out in the field by FSA State and county committees, respectively.
( b ) State and county committees, and representatives and their employees, do not have authority to modify or waive any of the provisions of the regulations, except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section.
( c ) The FSA State committee will take any required action not taken by the FSA county committee. The FSA State committee will also: ( 1 ) Correct or require correction of an action taken by a county committee that is not in compliance with this part; or
( 2 ) Require a county committee to not take an action or implement a decision that is not under the regulations of this part.
( d ) The Executive Vice President, CCC, or a designee, may determine any question arising under these programs, or reverse or modify a determination made by a State or county committee.
( e ) The Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs, FSA, may authorize State and county committees to waive or modify non-statutory deadlines and other program requirements in cases where lateness or failure to meet such other requirements does not adversely affect the operation of the On-Farm Storage Loss Program.
( f ) A representative of CCC may execute applications and related documents only under the terms and conditions determined and announced by CCC. Any document not executed under such terms and conditions, including any purported execution before the date authorized by CCC, will be null and void.
( g ) Items of general applicability to program participants, including, but not limited to, application periods, application deadlines, internal operating guidelines issued to State and county offices, prices, and payment factors established by the On-Farm Storage Loss Program, are not subject to appeal.