alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
101 World Drive

Peachtree, GA 30269

Our Ref: OZ/014/13/FAA

Via Docket Management System Web Site

29 April 2013

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

400 7th Street, Southwest Room PL-401

Washington, DC 20590-0001

Re: Request for Extension

Exemption No. 9342

Docket No. FAA-2007-28168

Dear Sir/Madam:

In accordance with the provisions of 14 CFR 11, Subpart A, 

121.434(c)(1)(ii), North American Airlines (NOCA172S) requests an 

extension to our previously approved Exemption No. 9342. This 

exemption has permitted North American Airlines to substitute a 

qualified and authorized Check Airman in place of an FAA Inspector to 

observe a qualifying Pilot in Command (PIC) while that PIC is 

performing prescribed duties during at least one flight that includes a 

takeoff and a landing when completing initial or upgrade training as 

specified in FAR 121.424. 

This substitution has occurred only at the discretion of the POI and 

only when an FAA Inspector was not immediately available. North 

American Airlines has complied with the Conditions and Limitations set 

forth by the initial June 20, 2007 and subsequent approval letter. 

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Very truly yours,

Roberta Mercurio

Manager Operations Administration

cc: David Currier – NAA Senior Director-Flight Operations

 Shane E. Pengelly – FAA Principal Operations Inspector
EX-33 (b)
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of
The First American Corporation, and the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006, and for the period from January 1,
2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
(d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of
Federal Regulations (the "CFR") applicable to the Asserting Party (the
"Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report
include all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which
the Asserting Party served as the residential tax service provider (the
"Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that, except as set forth
hereinbelow, the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

The Asserting Party assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has identified a material instance of
noncompliance with the servicing criterion set forth in Section
229.1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of the CFR with respect to the Platform. Specifically,
the Asserting Party did not prepare reconciliations for all asset-backed
securities related bank accounts within 30 calendar days after the bank
statement cut-off date or such number of days specified in the transaction
agreements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period as set forth in this assertion.


FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.
By: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC
General Partner

/s/ Lucy A. Przybyla
Lucy A. Przybyla
Senior Vice President
February 28, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JEROME J. HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 136 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of February , 2020, the “Petition to Allow Nunc Pro Tunc

Filing of a Petition for Allowance of Appeal” is GRANTED. Counsel is DIRECTED to file

a Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 15 days.
§ 610.14 Use of USLE, RUSLE, and WEQ. ( a ) All Highly Erodible Land (HEL) determinations are based on the formulas set forth in 7 CFR § 12.21 using some of the factors from the USLE and WEQ and the factor values that were contained in the local Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) as of January 1, 1990. In addition, this includes the soil loss tolerance values used in those formulas for determining HEL. The soil loss tolerance value is used as one of the criteria for planning soil conservation systems. These values are available in the FOTG in the local field office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service.
( b ) RUSLE will be used to: ( 1 ) ( i ) Evaluate the soil loss estimates of conservation systems contained in the FOTG.
( ii ) Evaluate the soil loss estimates of systems actually applied, where those systems were applied differently than specified in the conservation plan adopted by the producer or where a conservation plan was not developed, in determining whether a producer has complied with the HEL conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 3801 *et seq.,* set forth in 7 CFR part 12; and
( 2 ) Develop new or revised conservation plans.
Wilshire Credit Corporation
Payments
P.O. Box 30040; Los Angeles, CA  90030-0040
or   P.O. Box 650314; Dallas, TX  75265-0314
Correspondence

P.O. Box 8517; Portland, OR  97207-8517
Phone

(503) 952-7947 (888) 502-0100
Fax

(503) 952-7476
Web Site

www.wfsg.com

Exhibit 35 Exhibit T CERTIFICATION OF SERVICER March 1, 2007
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc. 250 Vesey Street 4 World Financial Center, 10
th
Floor
New York, New York  10080
U.S. Bank National Association 60 Livingston Avenue Mail Code EP-MN-WS3D
St. Paul, Minnesota 55107-2292 Attn: Structured Finance/SURF 2006-AB3
Re:
Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as September 1, 2006 among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as Depositor, Wilshire Credit Corporation, as Servicer and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to Special Underwriting and Residential Finance Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-AB3, Pool 1411
I, Ken Frye, Senior Vice President, Loan Servicing of Wilshire Credit Corporation (the "Servicer"), hereby
certify that:
i.

A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Servicer under this Agreement has been made under my supervision, and
ii.

To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such year or a portion thereof, or if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, I have specified below each such failure known to me and the nature and status thereof.
Wilshire Credit Corporation,
as Servicer
By: _/s/__Ken Frye_____________ Name: Ken Frye Title: Senior Vice President Loan Servicing
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3012]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,395]


Dawson Metal Company, Inc., Industrial Division, Jamestown, NY; 
Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for 
Reconsideration

    By application dated January 11, 2010, the petitioners requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 
applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The 
determination was issued on December 11, 2009. The Notice of 
Determination will soon be published in the Federal Register.
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that imports of precision sheet metal fabrication 
did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject 
firm and no shift of production to a foreign source occurred.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided 
additional information regarding customers of the subject firm and 
alleged that the subject firm lost bids to foreign competitors.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of January 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-3012 Filed 2-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

September 8, 2006

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Patricia Garner-Russo vs. State of Alabama, et al

Case Number: 2:06cv626-WHA

Pleading : #15 Answer

 #16 Answer

 #17 Answer 

 #18 Motion to Dismiss

 #19 Motion to Dismiss

 #20 Motion to Dismiss

Notice of Correction is being filed this date to advise that the Answers (doc# 16 and 17) and

the Motions to Dismiss (doc# 19 and 20) were e-filed on 8/30/2006 as duplicates filings to

Department of Health and Human Resources’ Answer (doc. 15) and Motion to Dismiss (doc.

18). These pleadings (doc# 16, 17, 19, and 20) are hereby STRICKEN from the record and

the parties are instructed to disregard the entry of these pleadings on the court’s docket. 

In addition to striking the pleadings, a corrected Answer (doc. #15) and Motion to Dismiss

(doc. #18) is attached to this notice. The original Answer and Motion to Dismiss failed include

defendants Page Walley, and Kim Mashego as filers to these pleadings.

Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 21 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2719 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ‘‘Earl D. Hutto 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mr. NELSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ‘‘Earl D. Hutto Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EARL D. HUTTO POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1400 West Jordan Street in Pen6 sacola, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Earl D. Hutto Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2719 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Earl D. Hutto Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1210 

CAF 13-00219 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF DARLENEA T. AND MIRACLE T. 

------------------------------------------- 

ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

WANDA A., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

COLUCCI & GALLAHER, P.C., BUFFALO (REGINA A. DELVECCHIO OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

JOSEPH T. JARZEMBEK, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

SHEILA SULLIVAN DICKINSON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO.

DAVID C. SCHOPP, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF

BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CHARLES D. HALVORSEN OF COUNSEL). 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M.

LoVallo, J.), entered November 8, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to

Social Services Law § 384-b. The order revoked a suspended judgment

and terminated the parental rights of respondent. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously reversed on the law without costs, and the matter is

remitted to Family Court, Erie County, for a new dispositional hearing

in accordance with the following Memorandum: Respondent mother

appeals from an order that, inter alia, revoked the suspended judgment

entered upon a finding of permanent neglect and terminated her

parental rights with respect to her children in this proceeding

pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. We conclude that petitioner

established by a preponderance of the evidence that the mother failed

to comply with the terms of the suspended judgment (see Matter of Shad

S. [Amy C.Y.], 67 AD3d 1359, 1360). Nevertheless, based on new facts

and allegations that we may properly consider, we further conclude

that it is not clear that termination of the mother’s parental rights

is in the best interests of the children (see id.; see also Matter of

Leval B. v Kiona E., 115 AD3d 665, 667). We therefore reverse the

order and remit the matter to Family Court for a new dispositional

hearing to determine the children’s best interests.

Entered: November 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### § 65.150 Goat.

*Goat* means meat produced from goats.
<PAGE>   1





                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                                                                     





                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the December 1, 1987
Prospectus (Registration No. 33-07056-A) of our report, dated February 1, 1996,
on the financial statements of Yager/Kuester Public Fund Limited Partnership,
which appears on page 6 of this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995 and to the reference to our Firm under the caption "Experts"
in such Prospectus.



/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
March 27, 1996
49.000 Scope of part.       This part establishes policies and procedures relating to the complete or partial termination of contracts for the convenience of the Government or for default. It prescribes contract clauses relating to termination and excusable delay and includes instructions for using termination and settlement forms.    **Parent topic:** Part 49 - Termination of Contracts
#### § 51.300 U.S. Extra Fancy.

“U.S. Extra Fancy” consists of apples of one variety (except when more than one variety is printed on the container) which are mature but not overripe, clean, fairly well formed, free from decay, internal browning, internal breakdown, soft scald, scab, freezing injury, visible watercore, and broken skins. The apples are also free from injury caused by bruises, brown surface discoloration, smooth net-like russeting, sunburn or sprayburn, limb rubs, hail, drought spots, scars, disease, insects, or other means. The apples are free from damage caused by bitter pit or Jonathan spot and by smooth solid, slightly rough or rough russeting, or stem or calyx cracks, as well as damage by invisible watercore after January 31st of the year following the year of production except for the Fuji variety of apples. Invisible watercore and smooth net-like russeting shall not be scored against the Fuji variety of apples under any circumstances. For the apple varieties listed in table 1 of § 51.305, each apple of this grade has the amount of color specified for the variety. (See §§ 51.305 and 51.306.)

[84 FR 51941, Oct. 1, 2019]
52.214-34 Submission of Offers in the

English Language.

As prescribed in 14.201-6(w), insert the following provision:

Submission of Offers in the English Language (Apr 1991)

Offers submitted in response to this solicitation shall be in the English language. Offers received in

other than English shall be rejected.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.214 [Reserved]
52.201 [Reserved]

52.201-1 Acquisition 360: Voluntary Survey.

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
# L_2014225DE.01009201.xml

| 30.7.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 225/92 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 225/92

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 374/2014 des Europäischen Pparlaments und des Rates vom 16. April 2014 über die Senkung oder Abschaffung von Zöllen auf Waren mit Ursprung in der Ukraine

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 118 vom 22. April 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 118 vom 22. April 2014

Auf dem Titel:

anstatt:

„Verordnung (EU) NR. 374/2014 des Europäischen parlaments und des Rates vom 16. April 2014 über die Senkung oder Abschaffung von Zöllen auf Waren mit Ursprung in der Ukraine“

muss es heißen:

„Verordnung (EU) Nr. 374/2014 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 16. April 2014 über die Senkung oder Abschaffung von Zöllen auf Waren mit Ursprung in der Ukraine“

---
#### § 51.775 Slightly misshapen.

*Slightly misshapen* means that the fruit has fairly good shape characteristic of the variety and is not more than slightly elongated or pointed or otherwise deformed.
#### § 58.33 Who may be licensed.

Any person processing proper qualifications, as determined by an examination for competency, held at such time and in such manner as may be prescribed by the Administrator, may be licensed to perform specified inspection or grading service. Each license issued shall be signed by the Administrator.

[53 FR 20278, June 3, 1988]
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I,  Anil  K.  Jain,  certify  that:

1.   I  have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on  Form 10-K of APA Optics, Inc.;

2.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  annual  report does not contain any untrue
     statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make  the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this  annual  report;

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
     information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly  represent  in all
     material  respects  the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows  of  the  registrant  as  of,  and for, the periods presented in this
     annual  report;

4.   APA  Optics,  Inc.'s  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13a  and 15(e)) for APA Optics, Inc. and we have:

     a)   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  ensure that
          material  information  relating  to  APA  Optics,  Inc., including its
          consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is  being  prepared;

     b)   Evaluated  the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
          as of a date and presented in this annual report our conclusions about
          the  effectiveness  of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
          our  evaluation.

     c)   Disclosed  in  this  report  any change in APA Optics, Inc.'s internal
          control  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the most recent
          fiscal  quarter  that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
          to  materially affect, the Company's control over financial reporting.

5.   APA Optics, Inc.'s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     our  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  our  board  of  directors:

     a)   All  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of  internal  controls  over  financial reporting which are
          reasonably  likely  to  adversely affect APA Optics, Inc.'s ability to
          record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information; and

     b)   Any  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees  who  have  a  significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls  over  financial  reporting.

June 29, 2004



Signature:  /s/  Anil K. Jain
            -----------------
Print Name:  Anil K. Jain
             ------------
Print Title:  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
              ---------------------------------------------------


<PAGE>
#### § 4280.20 [Reserved]
***Exhibit 32.1***

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of NextWave Wireless Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) for the period ended December 27, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Allen Salmasi, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section            906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

| (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Allen Salmasi |
|-------------------|

Allen Salmasi 

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Dated: April 1, 2009
§ 63.110 Powers and duties of the Board. The management of the NSIIC shall be vested in the Board of Directors. The Board shall have the following powers and duties: ( a ) Be responsible for the general supervision of the NSIIC;
( b ) Review any grant or contract agreement to be made or entered into by the NSIIC and any financial assistance provided to the NSIIC;
( c ) Make the final decision, by majority vote, on whether or not to provide grants to an eligible entity in accordance with the strategic plan;
( d ) Develop and establish a budget plan and long-term operating plan to carry out the goals of the NSIIC;
( e ) Adopt, and amend as appropriate, bylaws as necessary for the proper management and functioning of the NSIIC;
( f ) Provide a system of organization to fix responsibility and promote efficiency in carrying out the functions of the NSIIC;
( g ) Appoint and establish compensation for an executive director, who will serve at the pleasure of the Board, to be the chief executive officer of the NSIIC;
( h ) Appoint other officers, attorneys, employees, and agents as necessary and set forth their respective duties and powers;
( i ) Delegate, by resolution, to the chairperson, the executive director, or any other officer or employee any function, power, or duty of the Board—other than voting on a grant, contract, agreement, budget, or annual strategic plan; and
( j ) Consult with the following entities to carry out this part: ( 1 ) State departments of agriculture;
( 2 ) Federal departments and agencies;
( 3 ) Nonprofit development corporations;
( 4 ) Colleges and universities;
( 5 ) Banking and other credit-related agencies;
( 6 ) Agriculture and agribusiness organizations, and
( 7 ) Regional planning and development organizations.