alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC
Application of VIRGIN AMERICA INC. for a statement ofauthorization under 14 C.F.R. Part 212 (U.S.-Singapore) 

### ) ) ) 

### ) DocketNo. DOT-OST- 2012-0201 ) 

### ) ) )



## ___________________ )

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODE-SHARING

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

John Varley Senior Vice President &



### General Counsel Virgin America Inc. 555 Airport Boulevard, Suite 500 Burlingame, CA 94010 Tel: (650) 762-7108 john.varley@virginamerica.com

April 7, 2014 Malcolm L. Benge Jonathon H. Foglia Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger L.L.P. 888 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20006 Tel: (202) 298-8660 Fax: (202) 342-0683 rnlbenge@zsrlaw.com jhfoglia@zsrlaw.corn Counsel for Virgin America Inc.BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC
Application of VIRGIN AMERICA INC. for a statement ofauthorization under 14 C.F.R. Part 212 (U.S.-Singapore) ) ) ) ) Docket No. DOT-OST- 2012-0201 ) ) ) )

### ------------------~) NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODE-SHARING

Further to the blanket statement ofauthorization granted in the above-captioned docket, Virgin America Inc. ("Virgin America") hereby notifies the Department that, on or after 30 days from today, Virgin America plans to display the "SQ" designator code of Singapore Airlines Ltd. ("Singapore Airlines") on flights operated by Virgin America on the following routes, in conjunction with Singapore Airlines' scheduled Singapore-U.S. services in foreign air transportation (either non-stop or via third-country intermediate points):

From/To Los Angeles, California (LAX): Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) From/To San Francisco, California (SFO): Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK)April 7, 2014 Respectfully submitted,

# ftc!~~- Malcolm L. Benge 

# I
Jonathon H. Foglia Zuckert, Scoutt 

### & Rasenberger L.L.P. 888 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, 

## D.c: 20006 Tel: (202) 298-8660

- Fax: (202) 342-0683 mlbenge@zsrlaw.com jhfoglia@zsrlaw.com Counsel for Virgin America Inc

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice was served this 7th day of April,**2014~** via email transmission on the following persons: francis.heil@aa.com howard.kass@aa.com benjamin.slocum@aa.com robert.wirick@aa.com rpommer@atlasair.com sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com sam etta.c.barnett@delta.com anbird@fedex.com gbleopard@fedex.com kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com peter.beckett@polaraircargo.com jonathan.linde@united.com steve.morrissey@united.com dan.weiss@united.com lhalloway@crowell.com (Counsel for United Air Lines) gn1urphy@crowell.com (Counsel for United Air Lines) anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for United Parcel Service) jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (Counsel for United Parcel Service) mlbenge@zsrlaw.con1 (Counsel for North American Airlines) esta.rosenberg@dot.gov darren.jaffe@dot.gov brett.kruger@dot.gov info@airlineinfo.com

### J~nH.Fo~
31.101 Objectives.

In recognition of differing organizational characteristics, the cost principles and procedures in the

succeeding subparts are grouped basically by organizational type; e.g., commercial concerns and

educational institutions. The overall objective is to provide that, to the extent practicable, all

organizations of similar types doing similar work will follow the same cost principles and

procedures. To achieve this uniformity, individual deviations concerning cost principles require

advance approval of the agency head or designee. Class deviations for the civilian agencies require

advance approval of the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council. Class deviations for the National

Aeronautics and Space Administration require advance approval of the Deputy Chief Acquisition

Officer. Class deviations for the Department of Defense require advance approval of the Principal

Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition

and Sustainment.

Parent topic: Subpart 31.1 - Applicability
§ 760.1310 Misrepresentation and scheme or device. ( a ) In addition to other penalties, sanctions or remedies as may apply, a dairy producer or operation will be ineligible to receive benefits under this subpart if the producer or operation is determined by FSA to have: ( 1 ) Adopted any scheme or device that tends to defeat the purpose of this subpart;
( 2 ) Made any fraudulent representation; or
( 3 ) Misrepresented any fact affecting a program determination.
( b ) Any payment to any person or operation engaged in a misrepresentation, scheme, or device, must be refunded with interest together with such other sums as may become due. Any dairy operation or person engaged in acts prohibited by this section and receiving payment under this subpart will be jointly and severally liable with other producers or operations involved in such claim for benefits for any refund due under this section and for related charges. The remedies provided in this subpart will be in addition to other civil, criminal, or administrative remedies that may apply.
#### § 52.37 How official samples are to be identified and shipped.

Unless otherwise directed by the Administrator, samples which are to be shipped to any office of inspection shall be forwarded to the office of inspection serving the area in which the processed products from which the samples were drawn is located. Such samples shall be shipped in a manner to avoid any material change in the quality or condition of the sample of the processed product. Containers shall be identified and properly sealed with tape. A facsimile of the “Officially Sampled” stamp shall be placed over the taped container. All transportation charges in connection with such shipments of samples shall be at the expense of the applicant.

[51 FR 20439, June 5, 1986]
#### § 51.1864 Similar varietal characteristics.

*Similar varietal characteristics* means that the tomatoes are alike as to firmness of flesh and shade of color (for example, soft-fleshed, early maturing varieties are not mixed with firm-fleshed, midseason or late varieties, or bright red varieties mixed with varieties having a purplish tinge).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No.: 2:06-cv-618-MEF 

 ) 

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., ) 

et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS AND AFFILIATION OF

W. SCOTT SIMPSON

 The undersigned hereby gives notice of his new address and affiliation as follows: 

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC 

3288 Morgan Drive, Suite 100 

Birmingham, Alabama 35216 

Telephone: (205) 822-3422 

Facsimile: (205) 822-3618 

e-mail: wssimpson@bellsouth.net 

Dated this the _9th day of May, 2007. 

 /s W. Scott Simpson_____________

 W. Scott Simpson, Attorney for Defendant 

 Southern Energy Homes, Inc. 

OF COUNSEL: 

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC 

3288 Morgan Drive, Suite 100 

Birmingham, Alabama 35216 

Telephone: (205) 822-3422 

Facsimile: (205) 822-3618 

e-mail: wssimpson@bellsouth.net 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 31 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on __9th _ of May, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of 

such filing to the following: 

• Charles Lance Gould

lance.gould@beasleyallen.com; holly.stroh@beasleyallen.com 

• Carter Gibson Vance

gibson.vance@beasleyallen.com; heidi.bowers@beasleyallen.com 

 /s W. Scott Simpson 

 Of Counsel 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 31 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,230,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      10,307,300
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,708,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,436,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          641,900
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,436,700
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,959,300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,448,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (100,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                17,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                602,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            602,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   602,900
<EPS-BASIC>                                      19.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[107th Congress Public Law 283]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ283.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 2020]]

Public Law 107-283
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   301 South Howes Street in Fort Collins, Colorado, as the ``Barney 
      Apodaca Post Office''. <<NOTE: Nov. 6, 2002 -  [H.R. 5308]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 301 
South Howes Street in Fort Collins, Colorado, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Barney Apodaca Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Barney Apodaca Post Office''.

    Approved November 6, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5308:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            Sept. 4, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 17, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2583 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain synthetic basketballs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain synthetic 

basketballs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SYNTHETIC BASKETBALLS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.95.11 Basketballs having an external surface other than leather or rubber (provided for in 

subheading 9506.62.80) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 2583 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Chatsworth Acquisitions II, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Deborah A. Salerno, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Deborah A.
                Salerno
              Deborah
                A. Salerno
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              June
                26, 2007
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50515 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE BARRON-TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-41-1-AML

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose BarronTorres raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
----

## Taking Stock:  A Look at the Opportunities and Challenges Posed by Inventories from the Cold War Era

----

**Table of Contents**
Letter from the Secretary
Executive Summary
List of Figures
List of Tables
List of Photographs
List of Acronyms
Foreword
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Inventory
Chapter 3: Management and Vulnerabilities
Chapter 4: Disposition
Chapter 5: Path Forward
Appendix A - MIN Initiative Roles and Responsibilities
Appendix B - Executive Summaries of the Team Reports
Appendix C - Recently Declassified HEU Inventory Information
Endnotes
Glossary

About This Document
Posted  07/16/96  (mhp)
Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 10 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206

File Name: 12a0013p.06

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________

In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL

LITIGATION,

_____________________________________

BENNIE ADAMS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

CHARLES LORRAINE,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio;

GARY MOHR, Director, ODRC; DONALD

MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio

Correctional Facility; ANONYMOUS

EXECUTION TEAM MEMBERS 1-50, c/o

Southern Ohio Correctional Facility,

 Defendants-Appellants.

X

-

-

-

-

>

,

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

N

No. 12-3035

Filed: January 13, 2012 

Before: NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.

_________________

ORDER

_________________

Before this Court is the State of Ohio’s emergency motion to vacate the district

court’s order staying the execution of Charles Lorraine, scheduled for January 18, 2012,

at 10:00 a.m. On January 11, 2012, District Judge Gregory Frost issued a lengthy

written opinion granting the stay, based on persistent failure or refusal of the State to

follow its own written execution protocol.

1
No. 12-3035 In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation Page 2

Based upon the analysis of the district court’s January 11, 2012 Opinion and

Order granting a preliminary injunction and a stay of execution, as well as the district

court’s July 8, 2011 Opinion and Order entered in this same litigation and reported at

801 F. Supp.2d 623 (S.D. Ohio 2011), we conclude that the State’s arguments in support

of the emergency motion to vacate the stay are not well-taken. We agree with the district

court that the State should do what it agreed to do: in other words it should adhere to the

execution protocol it adopted. As the district court found, whether slight or significant

deviations from the protocol occur, the State’s ongoing conduct requires the federal

courts to monitor every execution on an ad hoc basis, because the State cannot be trusted

to fulfill its otherwise lawful duty to execute inmates sentenced to death. 

The State’s emergency motion to vacate the stay is DENIED. The stay will

remain in place until further order from the district court on the hearing set for

February 24, 2012.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

/s/ Leonard Green

_________________________________________

Clerk
52.216-8 Fixed Fee.

As prescribed in 16.307(b), insert the following clause:

Fixed Fee (Jun 2011)

(a) The Government shall pay the Contractor for performing this contract the fixed fee specified in

the Schedule.

(b) Payment of the fixed fee shall be made as specified in the Schedule; provided that the

Contracting Officer withholds a reserve not to exceed 15 percent of the total fixed fee or $100,000,

whichever is less, to protect the Government’s interest. The Contracting Officer shall release 75

percent of all fee withholds under this contract after receipt of an adequate certified final indirect

cost rate proposal covering the year of physical completion of this contract, provided the Contractor

has satisfied all other contract terms and conditions, including the submission of the final patent and

royalty reports, and is not delinquent in submitting final vouchers on prior years’ settlements. The

Contracting Officer may release up to 90 percent of the fee withholds under this contract based on

the Contractor’s past performance related to the submission and settlement of final indirect cost

rate proposals.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.216 [Reserved]
#### Johnson, Drake & Piper, Inc., Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 41591.)

Judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously modified on the law and facts in accordance with the Memorandum herein, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to appellant. Memorandum: Claimant established the claim as set forth in the second cause of action for $28,008.51 representing a balance due claimant for extra and additional work performed in the installation of finger type expansion dams on the elevated roadway structure and damage to wooden forms and structural steel caused by construction trafile during an extended period of delay in the completion of the construction work not resulting from any fault of the claimant. The State did not offer any proof to establish as a setoff any saving to the claimant resulting from the elimination of the necessity for the claimant’s making a final adjustment in the grade level of the expansion dams or a reasonable method of estimating such saving. As to the claim set forth in the third cause of action, the Meld Change drawing issued by the State required % inch nominal steel or aluminum shims under each rail post on the roadway structure. The requirement of % inch of various thicknesses of shims per each post set the maximum amount of shims claimant was required to install, and it is therefore entitled to recover its claim for $9,587.90 for aluminum shims used to adjust the handrail along both sides of the structures in excess of the contract requirements and labor in installing them. Finally, claimant is entitled to interest on the severed portion of its claim from the date of tender of final payment October 29, 1962 to the date of entry of judgment March 7, 1963. (See *Terry Contr.*v. *State of New York,*28 A D 2d 638, mod. 23 N Y 2d 167; *Higgins & Sons*v. *State of New York,*27 A D 2d 638, mod. 20 N Y 2d 425.) (Appeal from part of judgment of Court of Claims dismissing certain causes of action.) Present— Del Vecchio, J. P., March, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
# L_2023116EN.01002901.xml

| 4.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 116/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 116/29

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2021/1173 of 13 July 2021 on establishing the European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1488

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 256 of 19 July 2021
  )

| 1. | On page 21, Article 7(6), first sentence: |
| --- | --- |

1.

On page 21, Article 7(6), first sentence:

for:

‘6.   For the purpose of valuing the contributions referred to in points Article 15(3)(b) to (f) of the Statutes, ...’,

read:

‘6.   For the purpose of valuing the contributions referred to in points Article 15(3)(b) to (g) of the Statutes, ...’.

| 2. | On page 38, Annex, Article 3(3): |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 38, Annex, Article 3(3):

for:

‘3.   Provided that it contributes to the financing referred to in Article 15 of these Statutes (...), and that it accepts these Statutes, any legal entity that is not listed in Article 2(1)(c) of these Statutes ...’,

read:

‘3.   Provided that it contributes to the financing referred to in Article 15 of these Statutes (...) and that it accepts these Statutes, any legal entity that is not listed in Article 2(1)(d) of these Statutes ...’.

| 3. | On page 48, Annex, Article 15(3), point (g): |
| --- | --- |

3.

On page 48, Annex, Article 15(3), point (g):

for:

| ‘(g) | in-kind contributions by the Private Members or their constituent entities and affiliated entities as defined in Article 9(7) of this Regulation.’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(g)

in-kind contributions by the Private Members or their constituent entities and affiliated entities as defined in Article 9(7) of this Regulation.’,

read:

| ‘(g) | in-kind contributions by the Private Members or their constituent entities and affiliated entities as defined in Article 2, points (16) and (17) of this Regulation.’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(g)

in-kind contributions by the Private Members or their constituent entities and affiliated entities as defined in Article 2, points (16) and (17) of this Regulation.’.

---
# 46.305 Cost-reimbursement service contracts.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.246-5, *Inspection* of Services-Cost Reimbursement, in *solicitations* and contracts for services, or *supplies* that involve the furnishing of services, when a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 46.3 - Contract Clauses
#### § 51.2652 Fairly well colored.

*Fairly well colored* means that at least 95 percent of the surface of the cherry shows characteristic color for mature cherries of the variety.