alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

75613 

Federal Register 

Vol. 75, No. 232 

Friday, December 3, 2010 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8607 of November 30, 2010 

Critical Infrastructure Protection Month, 2010 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

During Critical Infrastructure Protection Month, we highlight the vast network 

of systems and structures that sustain the vigor and vitality of our Nation. 

Critical infrastructure includes the assets, networks, and functions—both 

physical and virtual—essential to the security, economic welfare, public 

health, and safety of the United States. 

The Department of Homeland Security leads an unprecedented national 

partnership dedicated to the security and resilience of our critical infrastructure. The National Infrastructure Protection Plan integrates a multitude of 

diverse stakeholders—Federal, State, local, territorial, and tribal governments; 

private sector critical infrastructure owners and operators; first responders; 

and the public—to identify and protect our infrastructure from hazards 

or attack. These critical infrastructure partnerships continue to build their 

information-sharing capacity and develop actions that strengthen our Nation’s 

preparedness, response capabilities, and recovery resources. 

My Administration is committed to delivering the necessary information, 

tools, and resources to areas where critical infrastructure exists in order 

to maintain and enhance its security and resilience. I have proposed a 

bold plan for renewing and expanding our Nation’s infrastructure, including 

its critical infrastructure, in the coming years. Additionally, we must work 

to empower communities, an integral part of critical infrastructure security, 

to work with local infrastructure owners and operators, which will make 

our physical and cyber infrastructure more resilient. Working together, we 

can raise awareness of the important role our critical infrastructure plays 

in sustaining the American way of life and develop actions to protect these 

vital resources. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim December 2010 

as Critical Infrastructure Protection Month. I call upon the people of the 

United States to recognize the importance of protecting our Nation’s resources 

and to observe this month with appropriate events and training to enhance 

our national security and resilience. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES4
75614 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 232 / Friday, December 3, 2010 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day 

of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30581 

Filed 12–2–10; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3195–W1–P 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES4OB#1.EPS</GPH>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Logan CountyBancShares, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

 
| Date: November 24, 2004 | /s/  Eddie Canterbury |                     |
|-------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------|
|                    | Name:                 | Eddie  Canterbury        |
|                    | Title:                | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                         |                       |                          |  |

 

----
52.237-1 Site Visit.       As prescribed in 37.110(a), insert the following provision:          Site Visit (Apr 1984)          Offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where services are to be performed and to satisfy themselves regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the cost of contract performance, to the extent that the information is reasonably obtainable. In no event shall failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for a claim after contract award.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.237 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Anna Kansky, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal *888by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying her from receiving benefits effective July 29, 1965, on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 1, par. [a]) and ruling that she willfully misrepresented to obtain benefits for which a forfeiture of 20 effective days was imposed (Labor Law, § 594). The board has found that claimant, a bakery sales clerk, left her employment for personal reasons, particularly because she was unable to obtain her employer’s permission to get a Saturday and Sunday off, her normal working days and the employer’s busiest days, and additionally because she felt that she needed permanent work and that as temporary replacement she would soon be released from employment. Here claimant urges that she was dismissed by her employer. The resolution of the conflict as to the cause of claimant’s separation from employment and whether such separation was for good cause are factual determinations and thus within the sole province of the board if suppported by substantial evidence (e.g., *Matter of Frankel [Catherwood],*26 A D 2d 866; *Matter of Gilmore [Catherwood],*25 A D 2d 462). On the instant record there is no basis to disturb the board’s determination of these issues. Similarly the board could properly find that claimant in indicating that she lost her job because “laid off slow no work” made a willful misrepresentation to obtain benefits (e.g., *Matter of Clemente [Catherwood],*27 A D 2d 676 and cases cited therein). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 1 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 2 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 3 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 4 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 5 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 6 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 7 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 8 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 9 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 10 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 11 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 12 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 13 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 14 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 15 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 16 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 17 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 18 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 19 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 20 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 21 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 22 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 23 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 24 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 25 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 26 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 27 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 28 of 28
§ 625.20 Scheme and device. ( a ) If it is determined by NRCS that a person has employed a scheme or device to defeat the purposes of this part, any part of any program payment otherwise due or paid to such person during the applicable period may be withheld or be required to be refunded with interest thereon, as determined appropriate by NRCS.
( b ) A scheme or device includes, but is not limited to, coercion, fraud, misrepresentation, depriving any other person of payments for 10-year cost-share agreements, contracts, or easements for the purpose of obtaining a payment to which a person would otherwise not be entitled.
( c ) A person who succeeds to the responsibilities under this part will report in writing to NRCS any interest of any kind in enrolled land that is held by a predecessor or any lender. A failure of full disclosure will be considered a scheme or device under this section.
§ 761.211 Transfer of funds. If sufficient unsubsidized guaranteed OL funds are available, then beginning on: ( a ) August 1 of each fiscal year, the Agency will use available unsubsidized guaranteed OL loan funds to make approved direct FO loans to beginning farmers and socially disadvantaged farmers under the Down payment loan program; and
( b ) September 1 of each fiscal year the Agency will use available unsubsidized guaranteed OL loan funds to make approved direct FO loans to beginning farmers.
[72 FR 63285, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 74345, Dec. 8, 2008. Redesignated at 75 FR 54013, Sept. 3, 2010, as amended at 86 FR 43391, Aug. 9, 2021]
SEND NOTICE OF SERVICE COPY TO REQUESTER AT NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW

2

Number of process to be

served with this Form 285

Number of parties to be

served in this case

Check for service

on U.S.A.

U. S. Attorney's Office

ATTN: A. Gardner

P.O. Box 197 RETWEO

Montgomery, AL 36101

Service Fee

1s-to 6

REMARKS:

PRIOR EDITIONS MAY BE USED

Form USM-285

Rev. 12/15/80

Automated 0 1/00

.i _-pified bel.

U.S. Department of Justice PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN

United States Marshals Service See

PLAINTIFF , CASE NUMBER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '," 3:06-cv-627

DEFENDANT TYPE OF PROCESS

ERICA L. MURPHY JUL I 8 P 2 S Application, Instructions, Notice, Writ of

NAME OF INDIVIDUAL, COMPANY, CORPORATION. ETC. TO SERVE OR DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO SEIZE OR

SERVE Mando America Corporation

AT ADDRESS (Street or RED, Apartment Au ( iy

ft t\Ul

4201 North Park Drive, Opelika AL 36&1

.......... ................................................................................................................................................................ I

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR OTHER INFORMATIO ftIA WILL ASSIST IN EXPEDTT1NG SERVICE (Include Business and.4/n ate Addresses,

All Telephone Numbers, and Esti nutted Times Available for Service):

Fold , Fold

SSN: ,, .,

DOB: 1 .

SPACE BELOW FOR USE OF U.S. MARSHAL ONLY-- DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE

I acknowledge receipt for the total Total Process District of District to Signature of thorized USMS Deputy or Clerk Date

number of process indicated. Origi Serve

thanoneM285tssubmitted) J No— Qe7

I hereby certiby and return that I .......i have personally served ........ I have legal evidence of service, L.....have executed as shown in "Remarks", the process described

on the individual , company, corporation, etc., at the address shown above on the on the individual , company, corporation, etc. shown at the address inserted below.

1 I hereby certify and return that I am unable to locate the individual, company, corporation, etc. named above (See remarks below)

-

Name and title of individual served (if not shown above)

.. I A person of suitable age and discretion

,1t4 v .

then residing in defendant's usual place

Address (complete only dt(ferent than shown above)

Total Mileage Charges Forwarding Fee Total Charges

including endeavors) 35 77.o

J_reofU.S.arshalor Deputy

Advance Deposits Amount owed to U S. Marshal 0 or

(Amount of Refund°)

$0.00

1.CLERK OF THE COURT

2. USMS RECORD

3. NOTICE OF SERVICE

4. BILLING STATEMENT 0 : To be retumed to the U.S. Marshal with payment,

if any amount is owed. Please remit promptly payable to U.S. Marshal.

5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT

Case 3:06-cv-00627-WKW-SRW Document 14 Filed 07/24/2008 Page 1 of 1
52.242-2 Production Progress Reports.       As prescribed in 42.1107(a), insert the following clause:          Production Progress Reports (Apr 1991)                                       (a) 						            The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the Contracting Officer the production progress reports specified in the contract Schedule.                                          (b) 						            During any delay in furnishing a production progress report required under this contract, the Contracting Officer may withhold from payment an amount not exceeding $25,000 or 5 percent of the amount of this contract, whichever is less.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.242 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**RESTATED OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10–K of WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR15 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

 

Date:  As of March 15,2007

|   |   | /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann                                                                        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  ThomasG. Lehmann                                                                 |
|   |   | Title:   President and Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MICHAEL DAVID SCEBBI,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20-cv-5930-TKW/HTC

OFFICE DEPOT INC,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to and at the direction of the Court, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff take nothing and that this 

case is DISMISSED.

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS,

CLERK OF COURT

February 16, 2021 s/ Jeremy Wright

DATE Deputy Clerk

Case 3:20-cv-05930-TKW-HTC Document 7 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 1
#### § 760.1607 Availability of funds and timing of payments.

For the On-Farm Storage Loss Program, payments will be issued as applications are approved.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2726 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2726

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Blue 80.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2006

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Blue 80.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACID BLUE 80.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.80      Acid Blue 80 (CAS   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         No. 4474-24-2)                                                     31/2009
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3204.12.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
30.607 Subcontract administration.

When a negotiated CAS price adjustment or a determination of noncompliance is required at the

subcontract level, the CFAO for the subcontractor shall furnish a copy of the negotiation

memorandum or the determination to the CFAO for the contractor of the next higher-tier

subcontractor. The CFAO of the contractor or the next higher-tier subcontractor shall not change

the determination of the CFAO for the lower-tier subcontractor. If the subcontractor refuses to

submit a GDM or DCI proposal, remedies are made at the prime contractor level.

Parent topic: Subpart 30.6 - CAS Administration
#### In the Matter of Landon Zuckerman, Respondent. Samuel Greason, Petitioner.

Motion by respondent, a suspended attorney, for reconsideration of this court’s decision, dated July 10, 1967, which suspended him from the practice of law for five years as of April 10, 1965 *(Matter of Zuckerman,*28 A D 2d 907, affd. 20 N Y 2d 430), and to restore him to the practice of law. Motion denied. Christ, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Peter H. Urban, Respondent, v Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corporation, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Applicant Urban, a "Love Canal” resident, commenced this preaction discovery pursuant to CPLR 3102 (subd [c]) by obtaining a show cause order directing Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corporation (Hooker) to disclose the identity of all persons and corporations involved with the design, construction, use, maintenance, covering and closing of the Love Canal dump site and all written records relating to Hooker’s disposal of chemical wastes at the Love Canal. Hooker objected and, after a hearing, Special Term ordered that such discovery proceed. Applicant twice examined one of Hooker’s employees, then, asserting that Hooker had not fully complied with the original order, obtained a show cause order directing Hooker to submit to further discovery. Special Term so ordered and applicant examined two of defendant’s employees. Thereafter, asserting that Hooker had not fully complied with the discovery as ordered, applicant obtained a show cause order directing Hooker to submit to further disclosure. After a hearing Special Term directed Hooker to produce an employee previously examined and a third employee for further examination. Hooker appeals, contending that applicant does not need further preaction discovery inasmuch as he has sufficient information to frame his complaint. CPLR 3102 (subd [c]) authorizes preaction discovery to allow a prospective plaintiff to frame his complaint and obtain the identity of prospective defendants *(Matter of Roland [Deak], 10*AD2d *263; Stewart v Socony Vacuum Oil Co.,*3 AD2d 582; 3A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3102:12). The extent to which disclosure before suit should be permitted is left to the court’s discretion (Advisory Committee Notes to CPLR 3102, subd [c], 4G Cons Laws Serv, CPLR 3102, p 558). We find that the discovery authorized by the various orders was proper. In addition, inasmuch as the previous proceedings have been held before different Justices, in consideration of judicial economy and orderliness, we direct that all future discovery proceedings be conducted under the direction of the Judge designated to handle these matters, who will control the time, place and circumstances of such further discovery. (Appeal from order of Niagara Supreme Court—discovery.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
222.001 Definitions.       “Labor advisor,” as used in this part, means the departmental or agency headquarters labor advisor.    **Parent topic:** Part 222 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS
#### § 75.36 Representative sample.

No lot inspection sample shall be deemed representative of a lot of seed unless the sample (a) has been obtained by a licensed inspector or an authorized employee of the Department; (b) is of the size prescribed in the instructions; and (c) has been obtained, handled, and submitted in accordance with the Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA) or the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) procedures.