alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

      Exhibit 31:  Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

Re:   Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2006-HE6 (the "Trust")

I, Steven Shapiro, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of the Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations
under the servicing agreements; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances o
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, NC Capital Corporation, WMC
Mortgage Corp., Decision One Mortgage Company, LLC, LaSalle Bank National
Association, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.

Date: March 30, 2007

/s/ Steven Shapiro
By: Steven Shapiro
Title: Vice President
30.201-2 Types of CAS coverage.

See 48 CFR 9903.201-2. 

Parent topic: 30.201 Contract requirements.
A . DELTA 

' : 

May 10, 2012 

Dennis DeVany 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Silver Airways 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

Delta supports the EAS program, and believes in the importance of providing small communities 

with reliable air service. Due to the retirement of our 34-seat Saab aircraft fleet, Delta no longer 

has suitable aircraft to serve the smaller EAS markets. 

Silver Airways has submitted bids in five EAS markets.

1 If Silver is selected, Delta would be 

willing to work with Silver on developing an interline and ticketing arrangement, participation in 

our SkyMiles frequent flyer program, and booking capability on delta.com. Delta would make 

these programs available on standard commercial terms, which are at Silver's discretion to 

accept and implement. 

Sincerely, 

Alexander Van der Sellen 

1 Greenville, Tupelo, Hattiesburg/Laurel MS; Muscle Shoals, ALand Greenbrier, WV
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U. S. C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This certification is intended to
accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Berkshire Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  The undersigned, in my
capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies to the best of my knowledge
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





August 5,
2010





/s/ Steven RosenbergSteven
      Rosenberg,Chief
      Executive Officer, Presidentand
      Chief Financial Officer
§ 755.13 Miscellaneous provisions and appeals. ( a ) *Offset.* FSA may offset or withhold any amount due to FSA from any benefit provided under this part in accordance with the provisions of part 1403 of this title.
( b ) *Claims.* Claims or debts will be settled in accordance with the provisions of part 1403 of this title.
( c ) *Other interests.* Payments or any portion thereof due under this part will be made without regard to questions of title under State law and without regard to any claim or lien against the eligible reimbursable costs thereof, in favor of the owner or any other creditor except agencies and instrumentalities of the U.S. Government.
( d ) *Assignments.* Any producer entitled to any payment under this part may assign any payments in accordance with the provisions of part 1404 of this title.
( e ) *Violations regarding controlled substances.* The provisions of § 718.6 of this chapter, which generally limit program payment eligibility for persons who have engaged in certain offenses with respect to controlled substances, will apply to this part.
( f ) *Appeals.* The appeal regulations specified in parts 11 and 780 of this chapter apply to determinations made under this part.
###### Editorial Note on Part 762

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 762 appear at 72 FR 63297, Nov. 8, 2007.

#### §§ 762.108-762.109 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of FLOMO RESOURCES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jason Gin, President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: September 2, 2007
|-----------------------

|By: Name:
Title: | /s/ Jason Gin Jason Gin
President, Secretary and Treasurer (principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
|---------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Order filed August 27, 2022

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00657

- CV

____________ ALBERT ORTIZ , Appellant

V. NATIONAL CITY HOME LOAN SERVICES, INC. D/B/A FIRST FRANKLIN LOAN SERVICES; AND NATIONAL CITY BANK OF INDIANA , A ppellee

On Appeal from the 164th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2006

- 61178



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed November 9, 2020 . Our review has determined
that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P

. 34.5(c). The record does not contain

1. Plaintiff’s No

- Evidence Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, with any accompanying exhibits, filed on or about November 26, 2014;2. Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion For Partial Summary Judg ment, filed on

or about June 1, 2016;

3. Plaintiff’s Motion For Leave To Amend Petition, with any accompanying exhibits, filed on or about August 5, 2016;

4. Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Disrega rd the Jury’s Response to Question No. 5 and for Entry of Final Judgment, with any accompany exhibits, filed on or about April 22, 2020; and

5. Plaintiff’s Sur

- Reply as to Defendants' Motion to Disregard the Jury’s Response to Question No. 5 an d for Entry of Final Judgment, with any accompanying exhibits, filed on or about April 29, 2020.

The Harris County district Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s
record on or before May 9, 2022 , containing the above documents

. If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIA M

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Has san

.
Re: GA GHG SIP 

James Capp to: Lynorae Benjamin 0511012011 08:55 AM 

Cc. "Chuck Mueller", "Jimmy Johnston", Carol Kemker, Dick Schutt 

Lynorae, 

Georgia EPD would like you to move forward with final approval. for the GHG 

rule and not wait on the resolution for the rescission clause. However, we 

would like to continue working with you on obtaining approval of the recession 

clause.
<PAGE> 1




                                  Exhibit 32.1

      Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                         /s/ C. E. PORTER
                                         -------------------------
                                         C. E. Porter
                                         Chief Executive Officer


                                         /s/ R. ALAN MILLER
                                         ---------------------------
                                         R. Alan Miller
                                         Chief Financial Officer


Date:   May 7, 2004
      ---------------------------
06/01/201 1 14:1 8 816329377 1 FA AAC E 7 PAG E 01/0 2 

### UNITE D STATE S O FAMERIC

A FEDERA LAVIATIO

N ADMINISTRATIO

N WASHINGTON . D. C I N TH E MATTE R O R GOJE T AIRLINES , LL C (V D GEA R PINS ) I lv: i 

### N TO F

FA ADocke t No . CPIOCEOO6 3 DM S No . FAA-2010-002 5 ri,' . T1, 0 • . I 

### 5 O | : 2 8

NOTIC E O FAPPEA LERRAT A COMES no w the Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , b y an dthroughhi s Regiona

l Counsel , fo r th e Centra

l Region , andhereb y correct s th e FA A Docke t No . CP10CE000 9 a s i t

i s foun don th e Notic e o

f Appea l filedon Ma

y 31,2011 , s o tha

t i t now read s CP10CE0003 . Datedthi s 1 " da

y o f June , 2011 . Respectfull y Submitted , A . Leste r Haizlip RegionalCounse l 

## B r / / , 

# 7 ' Davi dKessle

r Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 90 1 Locus t

Street , Roo m50 6 Kansa s City , M O 6410 6 ATTORNE

Y FORCOMPLAINAN

T06/01/201 1 14:1 8 816329377 1 FA AAC E 7 PAG E 02/0 2

I n th e Matte r

o f GoJe t AirUnes . LLC . FA A Docke t No . CP10CE0003 ; DM S FAA-2010-002 5 CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t I hav e thi s dat e sen t

th e Agency' s Notic e o f

Appea l Errata , vi a method s listed , t o belo w name daddressees : Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Ave , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearm g Docke t Clerk AG C 43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W100 0 (Origina l an d1 cop y vi aregula r mai l an dFa x t o 202-493-5142 ) Davi dJ . A . Hayes , m , Esq . Vic e Presiden t

& Genera l Counse l Tran s State s Airline s In c 1149 5 Natural Bridg e Rd. , Suit e 30 3 Bridgeton , M O 6304 4 ( 1 cop y viaregula r

mail ) Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodw m Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE l 2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 ( 1 cop y vi aregula r

mail ) Date dthi s 1"

^ day o f Jun e 201 1

>avi dKessle r Attorne y
52.252-5 Authorized Deviations in Provisions.

As prescribed in 52.107(e), insert the following provision in solicitations that include any FAR or

supplemental provision with an authorized deviation. Whenever any FAR or supplemental provision

is used with an authorized deviation, the contracting officer shall identify it by the same number,

title, and date assigned to the provision when it is used without deviation, include regulation name

for any supplemental provision, except that the contracting officer shall insert "(DEVIATION)" after

the date of the provision.

Authorized Deviations in Provisions (Nov 2020)

(a) The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision

with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the

provision.

(b) The use in this solicitation of any ______________ [insert regulation name](48 CFR Chapter______)

provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name

of the regulation.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.252 [Reserved]
§ 765.451 Continuation of FLP debt and transfer of security. ( a ) *Individuals who are liable.* Following the death of a borrower, the Agency will continue the loan with any individual who is liable for the indebtedness provided that the individual complies with the obligations of the loan and security instruments.
( b ) *Individuals who are not liable.* The Agency will continue the loan with a person who is not liable for the indebtedness in accordance with subpart I of this part.
#### NUNNALLY et al. v. ROBINSON et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Action by Francis Nunnally and others against Charles D. Robinson and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD 

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

 February 22, 2010 

 CISD-10-03 (HD) 

SUBJECT: Nonconformance Penalties for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines in 2010 Model Year 

Dear Manufacturer: 

As you are aware, in 2001 EPA adopted emissions standards for 2007 and later heavyduty diesel highway engines (40 CFR 86.007-11). The regulations implementing those standards 

include phase-in provisions at §86.007-11(g) and an interim NOx FEL cap at §86.007-

11(a)(1)(i)(B) that ended with the 2009 model year. Section 206(g) of the Clean Air Act permits 

EPA to establish nonconformance penalties (NCPs) related to standards for heavy duty engines. 

However, for the reasons described below, we do not at the present time believe that it would be 

appropriate to establish NCPs for the standards that become fully phased-in in model year 2010. 

The regulations in §86.1103-87 state that EPA shall establish NCPs where we find that 

certain conditions are met. Specifically, the regulations state that both of the following criteria 

must be met: 

(1) That for such subclass of engines or vehicles, substantial work will be required to 

meet the standard for which the NCP is offered. 

(2) That there is likely to be a technological laggard. 

While we believe that substantial work was likely required to meet the standards in 

§86.007-11, we have no evidence that there is likely to be a technological laggard for any 

pollutant or any service class. Based on the applications for certification that we have received 

to date, it appears that all heavy-duty diesel engine manufacturers will comply with the model 

year 2010 emission regulations. Furthermore, no manufacturer has indicated that it will not be 

able to meet these requirements in the future. As such, establishing NCPs for these standards 

does not appear necessary under the regulations. 

While we do not currently plan to establish NCPs, we are open to reevaluating this 

decision. We would expect that if EPA subsequently decides to establish NCPs, they would be 

available approximately 18 to 24 months after we begin the rulemaking. However, we do not 

expect to reevaluate this decision unless a manufacturer comes forward and claims that it needs 

non-compliance penalties under EPA regulations. 
Should you have any questions regarding this matter please contact Mrs. Khesha Reed at 

(202)343-9499. 

Sincerely, 

Karl J. Simon Director 

 Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division 

 Office of Transportation and Air Quality
#### Renmar Enterprises, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Monsax Corp. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 4, 1968, affirmed, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents filing separate briefs. In our opinion, implicit in the decision by Special Term granting plaintiffs’ motion to modify its earlier decision, and in the third decretal paragraph of the judgment entered in accordance therewith, which judgment is presently under review, is a ruling that upon satisfaction of the judgment and after payment of the necessary adjustments as determined by an accounting, plaintiffs will be entitled to a conveyance of the property deposited with defendant Welson as security. Accordingly, we deem it unnecessary to modify the judgment. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.11




CONSENT OF AUTHOR




TO:                         Ur-Energy Inc.


British Columbia Securities Commission


Alberta Securities Commission


Saskatchewan Securities Commission


Manitoba Securities Commission


Ontario Securities Commission


United States Securities and Exchange Commission




AND TO:              Toronto Stock Exchange


NYSE Amex, LLC




RE:           Ur-Energy Inc. (“Ur-Energy”) - Consent under National Instrument 43-101




Reference is made to the technical report titled “Preliminary Assessment Lost Creek Property Sweetwater County Wyoming”(March16, 2011) (the “Technical Report”) which the undersigned has prepared for Ur-Energy.




I have reviewed and approved the summaries of and extracts from the Technical Report prepared to be filed with the Annual Report on Form 40-F (Annual Information Form) of Ur-Energy (fiscal year ended December 31, 2010) and confirm that such summaries and extracts fairly and accurately represent the information in the Technical Report.




I hereby consent to the written disclosure of my name, and reference to and incorporation by reference of, the Technical Report in the public filing of the Annual Report on Form 40-F (Annual Information Form) of Ur-Energy with the regulatory authorities referred to above.  I further consent to the incorporation by reference of the Technical Report into Registration Statement No. 333-153098 on Form S-8.




I certify that I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 40-F (Annual Information Form) being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from the Technical Report or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services performed by me in connection with the Technical Report.




Dated:  March 17, 2011




Signed and Sealed




/s/ Robert D. Maxwell, CPG


Robert D. Maxwell, CPG, Senior Associate


Behre Dolbear & Company (USA), Inc.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40515 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROLANDO OYEVIDES-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-02-CR-800-1

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rolando Oyevides-Jimenez appeals his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following an aggravated felony conviction in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. For the first time on appeal, Oyevides-Jimenez argues that the sentencing provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) & (2) are unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000).No. 03-40515 -2- Oyevides-Jimenez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000) . OyevidesJimenez’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### § 661.2 Public access and copying.

Natural Resources Conservation Service will make available for public inspection and copying those materials covered by 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) as set out in the Secretary's regulations.
# 52.222-47 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.222 [Reserved]