alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Karl Kottmeier, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Zebra Resources Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
23rd day of November, 2007.


/s/ Karl Kottmeier
------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         936,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,340,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   238,000
<INVENTORY>                                 22,160,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,632,000
<PP&E>                                      17,965,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,974,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,704,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,233,000
<BONDS>                                      3,703,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,529,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,784,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,704,000
<SALES>                                     14,322,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,322,000
<CGS>                                        9,345,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,257,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             351,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                706,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   194,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            512,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   512,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.12
        

</TABLE>
Transport Transports Canada Canada TP 7245E



# AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your na me. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521 Division X . Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H , the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard

. This AD has been issued b y the Continuin g Airworthiness Division ( AARDG ) , National Aircraft Certification Branch, Trans p ort Canada, Ottawa, tele p hone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address. To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communicat ions Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8 , or 1-800-305-2059 , or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp
2 4-0022 ( 01-2005 ) 1/1 No

. CF-2013-32 Issue Date 8 October 2013

Number: CF-2013-32 Subject: Fuel System Safety – Non-Complia nt Refuel Control Solenoid Valve Fitting Effective: 22 October 2013 Applicability: Bombardier Inc. model DHC-8- 400, -401 and -402 aeroplanes, serial numbers 4063 through 4118. Compliance: Within 6000 flight hours or 36 months, whichever occurs first, from the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished. Background: During the incorporation of Modsum 4- 126630, mandated by AD CF-2010-31, it has been reported that fitting part number (P/N) 82822074-951 has been installed through the rear spar instead of fitting P/N 82822074-005 or 82822074-007. Fitting P/N 82822074-951 does not comply with fuel tank safety standards introduced in Chapter 525 of the Airworthiness Manual through Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) 2002-043. Therefore, this fitting shall be replaced to miti gate unsafe conditions that could result in a potential ignition source within the fuel system. This AD mandates the replacement of the abov e-mentioned fittings with compliant fittings P/N 82822074-009. Corrective Actions: Incorporate Bombardier Modsum 4-126537. Bo mbardier Service Bulletin (SB) 84-28-12, Revision A, dated 20 June 2013, or later re visions approved by the Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada, provides approved instructions for incorporating Modsum 4-126537. Incorporation of Modsum 4-126537 in accordanc e with the Initial Issue of SB 84-28-12, dated 23 July 2012, also satisfies the requirements of this AD. Authorization: For the Minister of Transport, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Derek Ferguson Chief, Continuing Airworthiness Contact: Robert Farinas, Continuing Airworthine ss, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 613-996-9178 or e-mail AD-CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS I, Zhao Yan, certify that: 1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Northport Network Systems, Inc.;2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;4.The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: April 14, 2011 BY:/s/ Zhao YanZhao YanChief Executive Officer
#### Wayne Brown, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[815 NYS2d 88]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered April 19, 2004, which, inter alia, granted the motion and cross motion by defendants New York City Transit Authority and the City of New York for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had not sustained “serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*448Defendants’ expert, an orthopedic surgeon, affirmed that his examination of plaintiff did not disclose any disability and plaintiff failed to provide any reasonable explanation for the undisputed circumstance that he ceased all treatment for his alleged permanent injuries some six months after the accident *(see Pommells v Perez,*4 NY3d 566, 574 [2005]). The bare assertion by plaintiff’s expert, who first examined plaintiff nearly four years after the purported accident, that at the time treatment was terminated plaintiff’s condition had plateaued and that further treatment was unlikely to be efficacious, was insufficient to counter the inference naturally arising from the cessation of treatment, that any injury sustained by plaintiff as a result of the alleged accident was not “serious” as that term is defined in the statute *(see Mullings v Huntwork,*26 AD3d 214 [2006]; *Smith v Brito,*23 AD3d 273 [2005]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Kalex Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Norman King, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: May 1, 2012
By:
/s/ Norman KingNorman King

Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
45.000 Scope of part.

(a) This part prescribes policies and procedures for providing Government property to contractors;

contractors’ management and use of Government property; and reporting, redistributing, and

disposing of contractor inventory.

(b) It does not apply to-

(1) Government property provided under any statutory leasing authority, except as to nonGovernment use of property under 45.301(f);

(2) Property to which the Government has acquired a lien or title solely because of partial, advance,

progress, or performance based payments;

(3) Disposal of real property;

(4) Software and intellectual property; or

(5) Government property that is incidental to the place of performance, when the contract requires

contractor personnel to be located on a Government site or installation, and when the property used

by the contractor within the location remains accountable to the Government. Items considered to

be incidental to the place of performance include, for example, office space, desks, chairs,

telephones, computers, and fax machines.

Parent topic: Part 45 - Government Property
u.s. DEPA1lTMENf OF ENERGY 

Building Technologies Program 

Test Procedure Waiver 

1000 Independence Avenue. SW 

Mall Stop EE·21 

Washington, OC 20585-01 21 

Gentlemen: 

luJy21.201 1 

This is a request for a waiver to the cutTellt, prescribed method of testing efficiency for the 

models listed on Certificate ofComplianoe 1764957 (111946) from CSA International (enclosed). 

The current D.O.E. test procedures,. found in the federal Register Part IVIO CFR430. notice 

dated May 1997. do DOt address condensing type beating equipment. Mantis is a condensing type 

direct hcateI-. vented with PVC. 

The Mantis was tested for efficiency using portions orlbe ANSUASHRAE Standard 103· 1993. 

Method of Testing for AFUE of Residential Central Furnaces and Boilers. This standard was 

used as a guide1ine for test procc:du:res and calculations through ste3dy state, including condensate 

collection. cool-down. heat-up and cyclic tests. Sections oflbe ANSJlASHRAE Standard 103-

1993 covering air temperature rise and static pressure cannot be applied to this type of equipment 

and were omitted. 

Enclosed you will fmd an e-mail correspondence from Phil Gauthier oftbe AHRJ Direct Heating 

Certification Prognun suggesting we request a waiver with associated pertinent information. 

Also enclosed, for your review, is our request for test with lntertek and subsequent test results. 

have also included our correspondence with Phil Gauthier of AHRI recommending we request 

this waiver. 

We appreciate your consideration in this maner. 

Respectfully, 

EMPIRE COMFORT SYSTEMS. INC. 

Empire Com/on Sy6II!mS Inc. · 91& FN!eburg A\1eIfJIe • Belleville, IlIinoa 61120-1623 

618133·7410 ·8OfJ851-3153 • Fax: 618131.7097 ·800443-8648 1 
Certificate of Compliance lt rtifleat~: 1164957 (111 946) 

Project: 2301.237 

moed lo: Empire Comfort Syst s, In<:. 

918 fueburc Aw 

fkfkWJe.1L 6IDO 

USA 

AtteDtioll: Wayoe Tbumemann 

MasterCoDtract: 188719 

Dak Issued: 20 10105117 

AlJ.oi<" NcJ.f ille,n, 

Issued by: Alicia McMillen 

PRODUCTS 

CLASS 2901 90 - DOMESTIC HEATERS (GAS) - Vented rlRplace-CondcnsiDg-Cutified to 

U.S. Standards 

CLASS 2901 10 - DOMESTIC HEATERS (GAS) • Vented Fireplace - Condensing 

PV28SY5(O,5)(B,C.G)(N,P)-{ 1·99), PY 28SY5(OB,SC.SG){N,P}{ I _99), PY 285Y5(OS,sC.SG)2H(N,P)-(I.-99) 

BF28(B,C,G)MK(N,P)-('.99). 8I28(B,C.G)MK(N,P)-('·99). BP28(B,C,G)MK(N,PH' ·99) 

FF28BMK(N,P)-( 1-99), FJ 28BMK(N ,P}{I-99), .... W28BMK(N,P)-( J -99) 

APPLICABLE REOlJlRD1u\']'S 

ANSI Z21.88-2009ICSA 2.33-2009 - Vented Gas Firepl&ct Heaters 

(SA 1.09- Vented Condensing Gas Firepbce Heaten 

DQO ""._I
**Exhibit 35.2**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, Barbara Campbell, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “AdministrativeAgent”), do hereby certify to Long Beach Securities Corp. (the “Depositor”) and Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Administrative Agent Agreement dated as of April 1, 2006 (the “ServicingAgreement”) by and between Long Beach Mortgage Company, as servicer and predecessor in interest to the Servicer, and the Administrative Agent the following with respect to Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-8 for the 2006 fiscal year  (the“Relevant Year”):

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

 
|  

__/s/ Barbara Campbell________________

Name:  Barbara Campbell

Title:    First Vice President |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
3.1106 Contract clause.

(a) Insert the clause at 52.203-16, Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest, in solicitations and

contracts that-

(1) Exceed the simplified acquisition threshold; and

(2) Include a requirement for services by contractor employee(s) that involve performance of

acquisition functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions for, or on behalf of, a

Federal agency or department.

(b) If only a portion of a contract is for the performance of acquisition functions closely associated

with inherently governmental functions, then the contracting officer shall still insert the clause, but

shall limit applicability of the clause to that portion of the contract that is for the performance of

such services.

(c) Do not insert the clause in solicitations or contracts with a self-employed individual if the

acquisition functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions are to be performed

entirely by the self-employed individual, rather than an employee of the contractor.

Parent topic: Subpart 3.11 - Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest for Contractor Employees

Performing Acquisition Functions
#### § 51.2964 Rancidity.

*Rancidity* means the stage of deterioration in which the kernel has developed a rancid flavor. Rancidity should not be confused with a slightly astringent flavor of the pellicle (skin) or with staleness, the stage at which the flavor is flat but not distasteful.
EXHIBIT 35.3

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC

                RASC SERIES 2006-KS8 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The  undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,
LLC, as servicer (the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing
agreement,  does  hereby  certify  that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
    Name: Anthony N. Renzi
    Title: Managing Director
EXHIBIT 32

Section 1350 Certifications

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, in his or her capacity as
an officer of Video Display Corporation, that, to his or her knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Video Display Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of Video Display Corporation. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A
signed original of this statement will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Date: October 15, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/RONALD D. ORDWAYRonald D. Ordway
Chief Executive Officer  
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 15, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/CAROL D. FRANKLINCarol D. Franklin
Chief Financial Officer

23

---

QuickLinks
## o_t II :) ·c :loY) Date: 

# TlL\.~ **~j** 1 1 

# /1 J .:Lo; S Mee tin g: 

### /a. v 

### ~0 f\)a._



### ~u,; )j Rule(s) D iscu sse d: 

## pr.())idu'-t (_£..\5(-{.L 

### {~.At<.~'- Written Materials? Y es/No

! Name Organi za tion Phone N urn ber 

# L .k Yi_Ui 

# 1\A'" '" 

# u 

# h.. AJ 

# tJ I 

# Jru

**~** Si)fl .. 

# &c)~; _jj_""""""-.;t/ _

, __ _,.l-=- z _ c2-=-----=0_1L_ t -=- 2 _ 

# -=-- **Jq~?J I**  " f- \C+- A\)

# A<f\1~ ( N



# ~ I 

### q1, '6 . V L- . 3' t.{



# ~ (} i 

## ,_j)r\ W



# ~. **~ ~**  -1 1&"N•; 

## ,J./ , fl'.v, M 

# rC/""



# Of;.j_~+-.j.

# --- ------i l

**(eJl~\** f\ I'"IC \tt \0(\ 

## o-Pdz 

# l ! Ethel Branch- Attorney General, Navajo Nation Derek Dyson- NTUA Greg Jones- NTUA Eugenia Quintana - Navajo EPA, Air & Taxies 

## I I Bethany Fisher- Jill Grant & Associates (Navajo Nat ion outside counsel)
(March 7, 1967)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joshua Marshall, Appellant.

Order entered June 2, 1965, denying, after a hearing, an application for a writ of error *coram nobis,*unanimously affirmed on the opinion of Mr. Justice G-eller. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Steuer and Rabin, JJ.