alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 264

AN ACT

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater

Study and Facilities Act to authorize certain projects

in the State of Hawaii.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hawaii Water Re5 sources Act of 2005’’.
 †

2

S 264 ES

1 SEC. 2. HAWAII RECLAMATION PROJECTS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and

3 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h

4 et seq.) is amended—

5 (1) by redesignating the second section 1636

6 (as added by section 1(b) of Public Law 108–316

7 (118 Stat. 1202)) as section 1637; and

8 (2) by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘SEC. 1638. HAWAII RECLAMATION PROJECTS.

10 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary may—

11 ‘‘(1) in cooperation with the Board of Water

12 Supply, City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, par13 ticipate in the design, planning, and construction of

14 a project in Kalaeloa, Hawaii, to desalinate and dis15 tribute seawater for direct potable use within the

16 service area of the Board;

17 ‘‘(2) in cooperation with the County of Hawaii

18 Department of Environmental Management, Hawaii,

19 participate in the design, planning, and construction

20 of facilities in Kealakehe, Hawaii, for the treatment

21 and distribution of recycled water and for environ22 mental purposes within the County; and

23 ‘‘(3) in cooperation with the County of Maui

24 Wastewater Reclamation Division, Hawaii, partici25 pate in the design, planning, and construction of,

26 and acquire land for, facilities in Lahaina, Hawaii,
†

3

S 264 ES

1 for the distribution of recycled water from the

2 Lahaina Wastewater Reclamation Facility for non3 potable uses within the County.

4 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost

5 of a project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed

6 25 percent of the total cost of the project.

7 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary

8 shall not be used for the operation and maintenance of

9 a project described in subsection (a).

10 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

11 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec12 essary to carry out this section.’’.

13 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec14 tions in section 2 of the Reclamation Projects Authoriza15 tion and Adjustment Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. prec. 371)

16 is amended by striking the item relating to the second sec17 tion 1636 (as added by section 2 of Public Law 108–316

18 (118 Stat. 1202)) and inserting the following:

‘‘Sec. 1637. Williamson County, Texas, Water Recylcing and Reuse Project.

‘‘Sec. 1638. Hawaii reclamation projects.’’.

Passed the Senate July 26, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 264

AN ACT

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and

ize certain projects in the State of Hawaii.Groundwater Study and Facilities Act to author-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule for KIMF contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,094,714
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,489,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                16,524,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,192,974
<PP&E>                                        1625<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,194,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,765
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                 8,181,834<F2>
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,194,599
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,474
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,025
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   139,449
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            139,449
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   139,449
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
<FN>
<F1>Other Assets
F2 Includes Limited Partners Equity of 8,399,621 and General Partners Deficit of
(217,787).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2757 

To temporarily increase the standard mileage rate for use of an automobile 

for purposes of certain deductions allowed under the Internal Revenue 

Code of 1986 and to temporarily increase the reimbursement rate for 

use of an automobile by Federal employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2006 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To temporarily increase the standard mileage rate for use 

of an automobile for purposes of certain deductions allowed under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and 

to temporarily increase the reimbursement rate for use 

of an automobile by Federal employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reimbursing Our 

5 American Drivers (ROAD) Act of 2006’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2757 IS

1 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN MILEAGE RATE DEDUC2 TION. 

3 (a) RATE FOR BUSINESS, MEDICAL, AND MOVING

4 USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE.—For purposes of sections 

5 162(a), 213(d)(1)(B), and 217 of the Internal Revenue 

6 Code of 1986, the standard mileage rate for use of an 

7 automobile shall be 60 cents per mile for any use after 

8 December 31, 2005, and before January 1, 2007. 

9 (b) RATE FOR CHARITABLE USE OF AN AUTO10 MOBILE.—Section 170(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

11 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘(60 cents per mile for any 

12 use after December 31, 2005, and before January 1, 

13 2007)’’ before the period at the end. 

14 SEC. 3. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN REIMBURSEMENT RATE 

15 FOR USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE FOR FEDERAL 

16 EMPLOYEES. 

17 For purposes of section 5704 of title 5, United States 

18 Code, the standard mileage rate for use of an automobile 

19 for an employee who is engaged on official business for 

20 the Government shall be 60 cents per mile for any use 

21 after December 31, 2005, and before January 1, 2007. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Lillian D.L. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Dolly L., Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 784]

*584In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of abandonment, the mother appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lehman, J.), entered November 1, 2005, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, and upon finding that she abandoned the subject child, terminated her parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject child to the Suffolk County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A parent’s right to be present for fact-finding and dispositional hearings in proceedings to terminate parental rights is not absolute *(see Matter of Ramon David W.,*290 AD2d 357 [2002]; *Matter of Raymond Dean L.,*109 AD2d 87, 88 [1985]). The child whose guardianship and custody is at stake also has a fundamental right to a prompt and permanent adjudication *(see Matter of Raymond Dean L., supra*at 90). Thus, when faced with the unavoidable absence of a parent, a court must balance the respective rights and interests of both the parent and the child in determining whether to proceed *(see Matter of James Carton K.,*245 AD2d 374, 377 [1997]).

In the instant proceeding, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in conducting the fact-finding hearing in the mother’s absence. In light of the mother’s past refusal to participate in this proceeding due to an alleged mental illness, and the amount of time that the child already had spent in foster care, the Family Court did not err in proceeding in the mother’s absence *(see Matter of William EE.,*245 AD2d 813, 814 [1997]; *Matter of Raymond Dean L., supra*at 89). Moreover, the guardian ad litem appointed for the mother and the mother’s attorney vigorously represented her interests at the hearing *(see Matter of Robert David L.,*7 AD3d 529, 530 [2004]; *Matter of Raymond Dean L., supra*at 89).

The Family Court properly found, upon clear and convincing evidence, that the mother abandoned the subject child during the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the petition *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [5]; *Matter of Andrew R.,*21 AD3d 378 [2005]; *Matter of Saquan L.E.,*19 AD3d 418, 419 [2005]). Furthermore, the Family Court properly concluded that termination of the mother’s parental right was in the child’s best interests *(see Matter of Lamont Dale M.,*11 AD3d 544 [2004]; *Matter of Jeremiah Kwimea T.,*10 AD3d 691, 692 [2004]). Goldstein, J.P., Mastro, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.
h

E

R

FW

Visitor Center

Twin

Barns

Puget Sound

Nisqually River

 ̈§¦5

McAllister Creek

Nisqually

R

vi er

h

h

E

R

FW

Visitor Center

Twin

Barns

Puget Sound

Nisqually River

 ̈§¦5

McAllister Creek

Nisqually

R

vi er

h

Figure 2.3-3

2-17

Source: USFWS, 2000; Ducks Unlimited, 1999; EDAW, 2002

Chapter 2 Alternatives

Nisqually NWR Draft CCP/EIS

P:\0e01401 Nisqually\GIS\mxd\Figure2.3-3.mxd

N

0 0.5 1 0.25 Miles

1:40,000

Alternative C: Refuge Expansion of 2,407 Acres

and Moderate Estuarine Restoration

Legend

Dike Changes

Current Ownership within Boundary

Modified RNA Boundary

Area Removed from RNA Designation

Public Recreation Trail

Expansion Area

Existing

Riparian Restoration

Estuarine Restoration

Freshwater Wetland Enhancements

 R

 E

FW

Nisqually Tribe

Private

WDFW

USFWS

Consolidated Hunting Area

Approved Nisqually NWR Boundary

h Bank Fishing Access

Bank Fishing Access

New Internal

New External

Berm

Removed

h Accessible Fishing Access
# L_2015213DE.01006502.xml

| 12.8.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 213/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 213/65

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 139/2014 der Kommission vom 12. Februar 2014 zur Festlegung von Anforderungen und Verwaltungsverfahren in Bezug auf Flugplätze gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 216/2008 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 44 vom 14. Februar 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 44 vom 14. Februar 2014

Seite 33, Anhang IV, Punkt ADR.OPS.B.080, erster Satz:

anstatt:

„Der Flugplatzbetreiber hat sicherzustellen, dass Fahrzeuge und sonstige bewegliche Objekte, mit Ausnahme von Luftfahrzeugen, auf der Bewegungsfläche des Flugplatzes gekennzeichnet und beleuchtet sind sowie dass Fahrzeuge bei ihrer Nutzung bei Nacht oder bei geringer Sicht beleuchtet sind.“

muss es heißen:

„Der Flugplatzbetreiber hat sicherzustellen, dass Fahrzeuge und sonstige bewegliche Objekte, mit Ausnahme von Luftfahrzeugen, auf der Bewegungsfläche des Flugplatzes gekennzeichnet sind sowie dass Fahrzeuge bei ihrer Nutzung bei Nacht oder bei geringer Sicht beleuchtet sind.“

---
# 46.302 Fixed-price supply contracts.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.246-2, *Inspection* of *Supplies*-Fixed-Price, in *solicitations* and contracts for *supplies*, or services that involve the furnishing of *supplies*, when a fixed-price contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed the *simplified acquisition threshold*. The *contracting officer**may* insert the clause in such *solicitations* and contracts when the contract amount is expected to be at or below the *simplified acquisition threshold* and inclusion of the clause is in the Government’s interest. If a fixed-price incentive contract is contemplated, the *contracting officer**shall* use the clause with its AlternateI. If a fixed-ceiling-price contract with retroactive price redetermination is contemplated, the *contracting officer**shall* use the clause with its AlternateII.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 46.3 - Contract Clauses
exv10w1







Exhibit 10.1




March 5, 2009




Tod Woolf, Ph.D.

RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation

60 Prescott St.

Worcester, MA 01609




Subject: RXi Pharmaceuticals/Newgate Properties Lease Amendment




Dear Tod,



Per the discussions with Eric Overstrom, Director of the WPI Life Sciences and Bioengineering
Center (Newgate Properties, LLC), this letter is to serve as an amendment to the Lease between
RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Newgate Properties, LLC dated September 25, 2007,
including all amendments and the extension thereof.



Beginning March 5, 2009, RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation agrees to add to their premises the
remaining Option Space shown in Exhibit D of the existing Lease. Newgate Properties, LLC has
agreed to waive the requirement of 60 days notice for this space. This space consists of the
western most lab pod on 3rd floor containing 610 usable square feet of laboratory space. Shared
access to GP3238 is also provided. Per the existing Lease terms, the rent will increase by a rate
of $34.00 per square foot per annum ($1,728.33 per month). Total monthly basic rent will be
$19,130.66 beginning March 5, 2009, effective through the remainder of the Lease term.



By signing this letter, we agree to the above terms.



Very truly yours,




LANDLORD:

Newgate Properties, LLC




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ D’Anne Hurd
 	 	 
	 	 	D’Anne Hurd, 
Vice President and General Counsel 	 
	 	 	Worcester Polytechnic Institute 	 
	 



TENANT:

RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Acknowledged and Agreed to as of this 5th date of March, 2009




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Tod Woolf
 	 	 
	 	 	Tod Woolf, 
Ph.D., President and CEO 	 
	 	 	RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 1 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 2 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 3 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 4 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 5 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 6 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 7 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 8 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 9 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 10 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 11 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 12 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 13 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 14 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 15 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 16 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 17 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 18 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 19 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 20 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 21 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 22 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 23 of 24
Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 1 Filed 12/22/03 Page 24 of 24
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Roger Mattis et al., Appellants, v. International Paper Co., Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Sweeney, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed January 22, 1969, denying compensation to claimants on the ground of no dependency. James Mattis, age 18, was killed in an accident on August 9, 1966 while employed by the International Paper Company. Claimant father was employed as a postmaster from May 23, 1964 and testified that he earned $440 per month. For several years prior to this he operated a dairy farm. In February, 1966 he sold the dairy, but retained the farm and lived on it with his family, including decedent. There was testimony that decedent, after graduating from high school in June of 1966, worked for a lumber company and contributed $10 to $20 per week to help pay a hireling for work formerly done by decedent on the farm. There was also testimony that before going to work for the International Paper Company he agreed with his father to pay $25 per week for the same purpose. He died before he could make any of the $25 payments. The father testified he did not depend on the farm for support, but kept it up in the hopes that one of his sons would some day take it over and operate it. The board found that neither of claimant parents were dependent upon the decedent for support, within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The sole question is whether there is substantial evidence to support this finding. We believe there is. Since the questions of dependency and contributions are factual ones, we should not disturb the board’s finding. *(Matter of Zelizer*v. *Prospect Inn,*28 A D 2d 1034; *Matter of Holloway*v. *Gamp Hatikvah,*14 A D 2d 638.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Sweeney, J.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berkshire Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Steven Rosenberg as Chief Executive Officer. President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                              /s/ Steven Rosenberg
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Steven Rosenberg,
                                              Chief Executive Officer, President
                                              and Chief Financial Officer

                                              August 11, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Berkshire Bancorp Inc. and will be retained by Berkshire Bancorp
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                       35
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        644
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,492
<PP&E>                                             132
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,818
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,200
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,652
<SALES>                                         17,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,366
<CGS>                                           16,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (11)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  87
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    324
<INCOME-TAX>                                        23
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       301
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>