alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Zebra Resources, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dan Gravelle, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act oF 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 18, 2009             By: /s/ Dan Gravelle
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Dan Gravelle
                                        Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
52.211-5 Material Requirements.

As prescribed in 11.304 , insert the following clause:

Material Requirements (Aug 2000)

(a) Definitions.

As used in this clauseNew means composed of previously unused components, whether manufactured from virgin

material, recovered material in the form of raw material, or materials and by-products generated

from, and reused within, an original manufacturing process; provided that the supplies meet

contract requirements, including but not limited to, performance, reliability, and life expectancy.

Reconditioned means restored to the original normal operating condition by readjustments and

material replacement.

Recovered material means waste materials and by-products recovered or diverted from solid waste,

but the term does not include those materials and by-products generated from, and commonly

reused within, an original manufacturing process.

Remanufactured means factory rebuilt to original specifications.

Virgin material means-

(1) Previously unused raw material, including previously unused copper, aluminum, lead, zinc, iron,

other metal or metal ore; or

(2) Any undeveloped resource that is, or with new technology will become, a source of raw

materials.

(b) Unless this contract otherwise requires virgin material or supplies composed of or manufactured

from virgin material, the Contractor shall provide supplies that are new, reconditioned, or

remanufactured, as defined in this clause.

(c) A proposal to provide unused former Government surplus property shall include a complete

description of the material, the quantity, the name of the Government agency from which acquired,

and the date of acquisition.

(d) A proposal to provide used, reconditioned, or remanufactured supplies shall include a detailed

description of such supplies and shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer for approval.

(e) Used, reconditioned, or remanufactured supplies, or unused former Government surplus

property, may be used in contract performance if the Contractor has proposed the use of such

supplies, and the Contracting Officer has authorized their use.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.211 [Reserved]
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-2 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-2 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 17-2 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 632.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to set forth the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) rules and regulations to carry out the Rural Abandoned Mine Program under section 406, Pub. L. 95-87; 91 Stat. 460 (30 U.S.C. 1236).
( b ) The Rural Abandoned Mine Program: ( 1 ) Through the NRCS delivery system, assists land users to voluntarily develop reclamation plans and apply conservation treatment for the reclamation, conservation, and development of eligible coal-mined lands and water, and
( 2 ) Provides cost sharing through long-term contracts according to an approved reclamation plan, to land users for establishing land use and conservation treatment on these lands.
#### Arthur Tavares, Respondent, v State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No. 60364.)

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and 'matter remitted to Court of Claims for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Claimant commenced an action for false imprisonment, contending that the State had not given him credit for jail time to which he was entitled and which would have made him eligible for good behavior, permitting his release on March 14, 1975, one year before he was actually released. In furtherance of this claim, claimant made a motion under CPLR 3120 directing defendant to disclose his prison file which had been considered by the Time Allowance Committee pursuant to 7 NYCRR 261.3 (a). Defendant asserts that claimant’s file contains various documents, some of which are potentially confidential such as letters from counsel’s office to the Department of Correction that are covered by the attorney-client privilege and claimant’s presentence reports which may be confidential under CPL 390.50. Under the circumstances, we direct the Court of Claims to examine the claimant’s file *in camera*to determine what parts of it claimant is entitled to examine and copy and what parts of it are confidential (see *Matter of Weaver v Waterville Knitting Mills,*78 AD2d 574). (Appeal from order of Court of Claims—discovery.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
§ 54.1005 Basis of service. ( a ) Certification of Sanitary Design and Fabrication of Equipment Used in the Slaughter, Processing, and Packaging of Livestock and Poultry Products service shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of this subpart, the instructions and guidelines issued or approved by the Chief and the applicable standards developed by the NSF/3-A.
( b ) Copies of standards developed by NSF/3-A that AMS will inspect and certify to are available, for a nominal fee, from NSF International at *www.nsf.org* or contact Techstreet, 310 Miller Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48103; Phone (800) 699-9277. Copies of all other instructions and guidelines can be obtained from, and copies of standards developed by NSF/3-A may be inspected at, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Dairy Programs, Dairy Grading Branch; Room 2746-S; 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250-6456.
( c ) All services provided in accordance with the regulations shall be rendered without discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status.
§ 611.2 Cooperative relationships. ( a ) Soil surveys on nonfederal lands are carried out cooperatively with State agricultural experiment stations and other State agencies. The cooperative effort is evidenced in a memorandum of understanding setting forth guidelines for actions to be taken by each cooperating party in the performance of soil surveys. Similar cooperative arrangements exist between NRCS and other Federal agencies for soil surveys on Federal lands.
( b ) Arrangements for nonfederal financial participation in the cost of soil surveys may be made with States, counties, soil conservation districts, planning agencies, and other local groups.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18U.S.C SECTION 1350)**

 

The undersigned, as theChief Financial Officer of Video Display Corporation, certifies that, to thebest of his knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended May 31, 2004 (the “Report”), which accompanies thiscertification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Video Display Corporation at the dates and for the periodsindicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not be reliedupon for any other purpose.

 
|   | This 14th  day of July, 2004 | /s/ Gregory A. Kittle |   |
|--------|------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|   | Gregory A. Kittle            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer      |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Video Display Corporation and will be retained by VideoDisplay Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

The information in thisExhibit 32.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemedincorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

 

----
Exhibit 10(k)
 Customer No.Loan No.Loan No.Loan No.
 RBC BANK (USA)
 WAIVER AGREEMENT
 VIDEO DISPLAY CORPORATION LEXEL IMAGING SYSTEMS,
INC. FOX INTERNATIONAL, LTD., INC. Z-AXIS, INC. TELTRON
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AYDIN DISPLAYS, INC. RONALD D. ORDWAY RBC BANK (USA)
 W I T N E S S E T H:
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS,




---



##### 



NOW THEREFORE
 ARTICLE 1.  Agreement; Acknowledgments
 Section 1.1 Acknowledgment of Default Asset Coverage Ratio
 Section 1.2 Acknowledgment of the Borrower and Guarantor
 ARTICLE 2.  Waivers
 Section 2.1 Waiver Covenant
 2.1.1
 2.1.2
 2.1.3
  2




---



##### 



Section 2.2 Continued Compliance With the Loan Documents
 ARTICLE 3.  Release; Waivers by Borrower and Guarantor
 Section 3.1 Release
 Section 3.2 Waivers
 3




---



##### 



Section 3.3 Waiver of Trial by Jury
 Section 3.4 Relief From Stay.
  4




---



##### 



Section 3.5
 ARTICLE 4.  Conditions to Effectiveness
 Section 4.1 Conditions
 Section 4.2 Execution of Agreement
 Section 4.3 Representations and Warranties
 ARTICLE 5.  Miscellaneous
 Section 5.1 Entire Agreement; No Novation or Release
 Section 5.2 Fees and Expenses
 5




---



##### 



Section 5.3 Choice of Law; Successors and Assigns
 6




---



##### 



BANK:RBC BANK (USA)By:
    
    /s/ Heather H. AlleaSenior Vice PresidentBORROWER:VIDEO DISPLAY CORPORATIONBy:Name:Title:[SEAL]LEXEL IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC.By:Name:Title:[SEAL]FOX INTERNATIONAL, LTD., INC.By:Name:Title:[SEAL]Z-AXIS, INC.By:Name:Title:[SEAL]
 7




---



##### 



TELTRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.By:Name:Title:[SEAL]AYDIN DISPLAYS, INC.By:Name:Title:[SEAL]GUARANTOR:RONALD D. ORDWAY
 8
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SAMMY LEE DONTON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:03cv295-RH/WCS

DR. JULIA BERRIOS et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST

DEFENDANTS BERRIOS AND MORALES

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 51), to which no objections have been filed. Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the opinion

of the court. The motion to dismiss filed by defendants Berrios and Morales,

(document 41) is GRANTED. All claims against these defendants are dismissed. I

do not direct the entry of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). 

This matter is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED this 10th day of October, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 5:03-cv-00295-RH-WCS Document 56 Filed 10/10/05 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Arthur Weiner et al., Petitioners, v. John P. Lomenzo, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Determination, dated June 5, 1968, suspending real estate broker’s license of petitioner Weiner and real estate salesmen’s licenses of petitioners Bonello and Spitzer for six months, unanimously modified on the law and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of reducing the penalty to three months’ suspension commencing from the date of the order1 to be entered herein, and, as so modified, confirmed, without costs or disbursements. The enforcement of the determination was stayed pending dispostion of the article-78 proceeding, which was transferred to this court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (subd. [g]). The determination finding petitioners guilty of untrustworthiness is supported by substantial evidence. However, in our opinion, under all the circumstances the sanctions imposed were excessive and unduly disproportionate to the offense. On the record before us, a suspension for a period of three months would be more appropriate. *(Ancis*v. *Lomenzo,*31 A D 2d 615.) Concur — McGivern, J. P., Markewieh, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 244

AN ACT

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction

of a hydroelectric project in the State of Wyoming.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 244 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE FEDERAL EN2 ERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION HYDRO3 ELECTRIC PROJECT.

4 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section

5 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would

6 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com7 mission project numbered 1651, the Commission may, at

8 the request of the licensee for the project, and after rea9 sonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due dili10 gence, and public interest requirements of that section and

11 the Commission’s procedures under that section, extend

12 the time period during which the licensee is required to

13 commence the construction of the project for 3 consecutive

14 2-year periods from the date of the expiration of the exten15 sion originally issued by the Commission.

Passed the Senate July 26, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 244

AN ACT

To extend the deadline for commencement of conof Wyoming. struction of a hydroelectric project in the State
#### § 58.726 Cutting and grinding.

The trimmed and cleaned cheese should be cut into sections of convenient size to be handled by the grinder or shredder. The grinding and mixing of the blended lots of cheese should be done in such a manner as to insure a homogeneous mixture throughout the batch.
#### § 5001.407 Percentage of loan guarantee.

The percent of loan guaranteed may vary from program to program. The maximum guarantee is 90 percent of eligible guaranteed loan loss The Agency will set annually a guarantee percentage by program that will apply to loans guaranteed within each program. The annual guarantee percentage will take current Federal credit policy into consideration and may be set at or below the maximum allowed authorized by statute. The Agency will announce annual guarantee percentages each fiscal year by publishing a document in the Federal Register in accordance with § 5001.10.
19–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 2d Session 107–773

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 5710, HOMELAND 

SECURITY ACT OF 2002

NOVEMBER 13 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 12), 2002.—Referred to the House 

Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 600]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 600, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5710, to establish the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes, 

under a closed rule. The rule provides one hour of debate in the 

House equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 

minority member of the Select Committee on Homeland Security. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit.

Æ
# 52.219-15 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.219 [Reserved]
Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF   Document 42   Filed 01/13/22   Page 1 of 3

Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF   Document 42   Filed 01/13/22   Page 2 of 3

Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF   Document 42   Filed 01/13/22   Page 3 of 3
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
141 CA 09-02077 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT SILLS AND AUDREY ELAINE SILLS, AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ANGELINE V. SILLS, DECEASED, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FLEET NATIONAL BANK, JOAN ROYSTON AND KIRK RICHARDSON, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

------------------------------------------- AUDREY PATRONE PEARTREE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, RESPONDENT.

------------------------------------------- ROBERT SILLS AND AUDREY ELAINE SILLS, AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ANGELINE V. SILLS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
V FLEET BANK AND JOAN ROYSTON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

------------------------------------------- AUDREY PATRONE PEARTREE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, RESPONDENT.

------------------------------------------- ROBERT SILLS AND AUDREY ELAINE SILLS, AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ANGELINE V. SILLS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
V JOAN ROYSTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

------------------------------------------- AUDREY PATRONE PEARTREE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

GATES & ADAMS, P.C., ROCHESTER (MICHAEL STEINBERG OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS AND PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. MCDONOUGH & ARTZ, P.C., BINGHAMTON (PHILIP J. ARTZ OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT AND DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT JOAN ROYSTON. THE WOLFORD LAW FIRM LLP, ROCHESTER (ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.-2- 141 CA 09-02077 UNDERBERG & KESSLER LLP, ROCHESTER (PAUL V. NUNES OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT FLEET NATIONAL BANK AND DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT FLEET BANK.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Peter C. Bradstreet, A.J.), entered June 3, 2009. The order, among other things, adjudged that all reasonable fees and disbursements incurred by guardian ad litem Audrey Patrone Peartree in an appeal of the court’s decision and order dated January 28, 2009 be paid for by the Estate of Angeline V. Sills. It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Sills v Fleet Natl. Bank ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 18, 2011]).

Entered: February 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
# 52.214-13 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.214 [Reserved]
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW     Document 129-2      Filed 03/16/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW     Document 129-2      Filed 03/16/2007     Page 2 of 2
# L_2022043EN.01009401.xml

| 24.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 43/94 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 43/94

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1702 of 12 July 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2021/523 of the European Parliament and of the Council by setting out additional elements and detailed rules for the InvestEU Scoreboard

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 339 of 24 September 2021
  )

On page 24, in ‘Table 3 – Intermediated financing’, Indicator ‘2. Employment’, range ‘Very good (= 3)’:

for:

| ‘— | for guarantees: between 100 and 175,’, |
| --- | --- |

‘—

for guarantees: between 100 and 175,’,

read:

| ‘— | for guarantees: between 101 and 300,’; |
| --- | --- |

‘—

for guarantees: between 101 and 300,’;

for:

| ‘— | for equity: between 10 and 15.’, |
| --- | --- |

‘—

for equity: between 10 and 15.’,

read:

| ‘— | for equity: between 11 and 15.’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

for equity: between 11 and 15.’.

---
NUMBER 13-14-00552-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS, RICHARD FREYMANN,

SAM FLEMING, SILVIA GARZA, AND EVELYN DONALSON

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relators, State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freymann, Sam Fleming, Sylvia Garza, and 

Evelyn Donalson, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court 

direct respondent, the Honorable Rose Guerra Reyna, Presiding Judge of the 206th 

District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, to withdraw her order denying relators’ verified 

plea in abatement and to enter an order abating the suit for damages brought against 

relators by the real parties in interest, Silvestre Gonzales and Norma Gonzales, until sixty 

 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

days after they provide relators with a notice letter for their claim stating the specific, 

separate amounts for the claimed damages and attorney’s fees. See TEX. INS. CODE 

ANN. § 541.154 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Prior Notice of Action”); id. § 

541.155 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Abatement”); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1 

(“Commencement” of Original Proceedings). In addition, relators request that this Court 

issue immediate temporary relief staying respondent’s order denying the plea in 

abatement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10 (“Temporary Relief”). 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus 

and the applicable law, is of the opinion that the petition for writ of mandamus should be 

denied for the reasons expressed in our opinion in In re State Farm Lloyds, Richard 

Freymann, and Nathan Burris, No. 13-14-00347-CV, 2014 WL 4243701, at **4–9 (Tex. 

App.—Corpus Christi Aug. 27, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op). Accordingly, the 

Court DENIES the petition for writ of mandamus and request for immediate temporary 

relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

26th day of September, 2014.