alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
s ice on behalf of: TELEPHONE NUMR

PLAINTIFF I

o DEFENDANT I (334) 223-7280

TE

1/4/08

one

Date of Service, t Time am

I

U.S.

Total Charges Advance Deposits Amunt Owed to US Marshal or Amowit or Relund

U.S. Department of Justice

United States Marshals Service

PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN ()

See Instructions for "Service of Process by the U.S. Marsha!"

on the reverse of this form / -

PLAINTIFF COURT CASE NUMBER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2 :O6crl 69-WKW

DEFENDANT TYPE OF PROCESS

JAMES CALVIN TALLEY PRELIMINARY ORDER OF

FORFEITURE

SERVE NAME OF INDIVIDUAL, COMPANY, CORPORATION, ETC. TO SERVE OR DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO SEIZE OR CONDEMN

JOHN ROBINSON

AT ADDRESS (Street 0rRFD, Apartment No., City, State, and ZIP Code)

76 COUNTY ROAD 538 - MARBURY, ALABAMA 36051

SEND NOTICE OF SERVICE TO REQUESTER AT NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW: I Number of process to be served 1

;withsForm-285

John T. Harmon Number of parties to be served

United States Attorney's Office m is case

Assistant United States Attorney 1

Post Office Box 197 I Check for service

Montgomery Alabama 36101-0197 - rr

-----------------------__________________ _________

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR OTHER INFORMATION THAT WILL ASSIST IN EXPEDITING SERVICE (include BusirqrantL4lterndt AddrrsiAll

Telephone Numbers, and Estimated Times Available For Service) -

Asset Identification No 06 DEA 466449 'IJ

r

:

SPACE BELOW FOR USE OF U.S. MARSHAL ONLY - DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE

Au i USMS Deputy or Cl;erk Date

of nroK indicated.

dedgereeipt for the total

J 

Total Process

J 

District of Origin District to Serve

lyrst USM 285 if more than ____

. c No.__) ( 85 is submitted) No.______ No ______ ______ J ___________________________________ C I ôí /7 Jc

I hereby certify and return that I 0 have personally served, 0 have legal evidence of service, 'iI ' executed as shown in "Remarks", the process described on

the individual, company, corporation, etc. at the address shown above or on the individual, company, corporation, etc., shown at the address inserted below.

o 1 hereby certify and and return that I am unable to locate the individual, company, corporation, etc., named above (See remarks below).

Name and title of individual served (if not shown above). A person of suitable age and discretion then

• / 0 residing in the defendant's usual place of abode,

Address (complete only f different than shown above)

Service Fee Total Mileage Charges Forwarding Fee 4- °rREMARKS:

RETURNED AND FILED

JAN I 4 2008

BE USED

MAY

U. s. DtST RM285 (Rev. 12/15/80)

kDCLE L'S 1. j;.:

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 502 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2804 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2804

             To extend the duty suspension on polysiloxane.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2006

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To extend the duty suspension on polysiloxane.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLYSILOXANE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.04.02 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to polysiloxane) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

DECLARATION OF TERESA GUZMAN PAGAN

I, TERESA GUZMAN PAGAN, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, declare as follows:

1. I am over the age of 18 and fully competent two make this declaration. 

2. I am the Senior Voter Registration Manger of NEW FLORIDA MAJORITY 

EDUCATION FUND (“NewFM”), an independent, non-partisan, and non-profit 

organization.

3. I have held this position for a year and a half.

4. In my position, I supervise over 200 voter registration canvassers and I manage NewFM’s 

voter registration, voter education, and voter outreach programs.

5. On October 5, 2020, I supervised 200 canvassers who were fully remote doing voter 

registration outreach in six counties. Around 5:00 p.m., we were preparing to help with 

follow up on voter registration applications for the people we engaged during the day.

6. We could not complete this follow up, including quality control and other processes, on 

those new registrations due to the OVR crash. 

7. Instead, we also started doing troubleshooting and trying to understand the extent of the 

crash, talking to local and national partners and election officials.

8. On Tuesday, only a small team of us – only two or three people – were working. The rest 

of our 200+ canvassing team members were taking a day off. They have been at it for 

weeks. Some were finally going to dentist appointments and so forth.

9. So when the extension happened around 1:00 p.m., we were caught off guard. We tried to 

bring as many canvassing team members back as we could. But we were unable to staff up 

fully to do the follow up with the people did not complete their registrations on Monday 

night.

Case 4:20-cv-00485-MW-MAF Document 26-3 Filed 10/07/20 Page 1 of 2
2

10. We need additional time to follow up with the people from Monday.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

Miami, Florida

October 7, 2020 

Teresa Guzman Pagan _____

Printed Name

s/Teresa Guzman Pagan

Signature

Case 4:20-cv-00485-MW-MAF Document 26-3 Filed 10/07/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 51.301 U.S. Fancy.

“U.S. Fancy” consists of apples of one variety (except when more than one variety is printed on the container) which are mature but not overripe, clean, fairly well formed, and free from decay, internal browning, internal breakdown, soft scald, freezing injury, visible watercore, and broken skins. The apples are also free from damage caused by bruises, brown surface discoloration, russeting, sunburn or sprayburn, limb rubs, hail, drought spots, scars, stem or calyx cracks, disease, insects, bitter pit, Jonathan spot, or damage by other means, or invisible watercore after January 31st of the year following the year of production, except for the Fuji variety of apples. Invisible watercore and smooth net-like russeting shall not be scored against the Fuji variety of apples under any circumstances. For the apple varieties listed in table 1 of § 51.305, each apple of this grade has the amount of color specified for the variety. (See §§ 51.305 and 51.306.)

[84 FR 51941, Oct. 1, 2019]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76015-76016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30679]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0551]


Compliance Policy Guide Sec. 393.200 Laser(s) as Medical Devices 
for Facelift, Wrinkle Removal, Acupuncture, Auricular Stimulation, 
Etc.; Withdrawal of Guidance

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
withdrawal of Compliance Policy Guide Sec. 393.200 Laser(s) as Medical 
Devices for Facelift, Wrinkle Removal, Acupuncture, Auricular 
Stimulation, etc. (CPG Sec. 393.200). CPG Sec. 393.200 is included in 
FDA's Compliance Policy Guides Manual, which was listed in the Annual 
Comprehensive List of Guidance Documents that published on August 9, 
2010.

DATES: The withdrawal is effective December 7, 2010.

[[Page 76016]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean M. Boyd, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health, Office of Communication, Education, and 
Radiological Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 4640, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-5895.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice containing a cumulative list of 
guidances available from the Agency that published in the Federal 
Register of August 9, 2010 (75 FR 48180 at 48233), FDA included the 
Compliance Policy Guides Manual, which includes CPG Sec. 393.200. FDA 
is withdrawing CPG Sec. 393.200 because it is obsolete.

    Dated: November 23, 2010.
Dara Corrigan,
Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010-30679 Filed 12-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
§ 632.11 Availability of funds. ( a ) The provisions of the program are subject to the annual appropriation by Congress of funds from the Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund and the transfer of as much as 20 percent of these funds from the Office to Surface Mining to NRCS for program operation.
( b ) Allotments of Rural Abandoned Mine Program funds to state conservationists are to reflect the national program needs, the geographic areas from which the funds were derived, the funding priority assigned to applications for program assistance, including benefits expected to be derived, and the practicability and feasibility of the reclamation work proposed.
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 3 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 3 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

#

**2014/111/EU: Council Decision of 24 February 2014 appointing a member of the Court of Auditors **

*
Official Journal L 061 , 01/03/2014 P. 0006 - 0006 *

Council Decision

of 24 February 2014

appointing a member of the Court of Auditors

(2014/111/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 286(2) thereof,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament [1],

Whereas:

(1) The term of office of Mr Harald NOACK expires on 28 February 2014.

(2) A new appointment should therefore be made,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Klaus-Heiner LEHNE is hereby appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 1 March 2014 to 29 February 2020.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 24 February 2014.

For the Council

The President

K. Arvanitopoulos

[1] Opinion of 4 February 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

--------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BRUCE A. LING, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:21cv34-WS/MJF

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner

of Social Security,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 22) docketed May 24, 2022. The magistrate judge recommends that the

Commissioner's decision to deny the plaintiff's application for disability insurance

benefits be affirmed. The plaintiff has filed no objections to the report and

recommendation, despite having been granted an extension of time to do so. 

 The undersigned having reviewed the record, it is ORDERED:

Case 4:21-cv-00034-WS-MJF Document 25 Filed 08/24/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. The court ADOPTS and incorporates by reference into this order the

magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 22).

2. The Commissioner's decision to deny the plaintiff's application for

disability insurance benefits is AFFIRMED.

3. The plaintiff’s “Motion of Supplemental Certification Newly Developed/

Discovered Evidence” (ECF No. 20) is DENIED.

4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "The decision of the Commissioner

is AFFIRMED."

5. The clerk shall close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of August , 2022.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:21-cv-00034-WS-MJF Document 25 Filed 08/24/22 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 19 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 19 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DUE PROCESS, LTD., et al., 

 Plaintiffs,

vs. Case No. 3:03cv580/MCR/MD

ALTERNATIVE DEBT SERVICES,

INC., et al.,

 Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. On October 6, 2006

plaintiffs and defendant Olive filed a Stipulated Motion for Voluntary Dismissal as to

Defendant Patrick Olive (doc. 105). These parties request that plaintiffs’ claims

against defendant Olive be dismissed without prejudice, and without costs or fees

to either party. 

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That the Stipulated Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (doc. 105) be GRANTED,

and plaintiffs’ claims against defendant Patrick Olive be DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 10th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 108 Filed 10/10/06 Page 1 of 2
Case No: 3:03cv580/MCR/MD Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within ten days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 108 Filed 10/10/06 Page 2 of 2
#### Leonard Hospital, Appellant, v. Kenneth Messier, Respondent.

Greenblott, J.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Saratoga County which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s motion for leave to file an amended answer. The affidavit of respondent’s attorney is inadequate to support a motion for leave to file an amended answer. While leave to amend is to be freely given, upon such terms as may be just (CPLR 3025, subd. [fo]), the affidavit accompanying the notice of motion should be the affidavit of the party himself. The attorney’s affidavit cannot be accepted in lieu of the affidavit of the party, unless the facts upon which the motion is based are peculiarly within the knowledge of the attorney. In the case at bar the facts are within the knowledge of respondent. In the interests of justice, respondent should be afforded an opportunity to submit such affidavit. Since appellant’s motion for summary judgment may be dependent upon the respondent’s motion to amend his answer, appellant should also have an opportunity to renew its motion for summary judgment. Order modified, on the law and the facts, so as to deny respondent’s motion for leave to file an amended answer without prejudice to renewal thereof and without prejudice to renewal by appellant of its motion for summary judgment, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to appellant. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, *597Reynolds, Aulisi and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by Greenblott J.
[No. 9130.

Department One.

January 3, 1911.]

#### Samuel Garrett, *Respondent,*v. Sparks Brothers, *Appellant.**1*

Principal and Agent — Third Persons — Liability of Agent— Fraud. An agent in the sale of land is liable in damages for fraud whereby he induced the plaintiff to pay him money on the purchase price of the land.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Webster, J., entered January 18, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to recover money paid under a contract to purchase land.

Affirmed.

*John M. Gleeson*and *Joseph F. Morton,*for appellant.

*Barker*<§■ *Barker*and *C. C. Upton,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 112 Pac. 501.

Gose, J.

This is a suit to recover money alleged to have been obtained from the plaintiff through the fraud of the defendant. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed.

There is abundant evidence to support the judgment. The testimony of the respondent shows that the appellant was acting as agent for the Plantations Company for the sale of certain tracts of orchard land; that the appellant represented to the respondent that the Plantations Company owned a piece of land called Plantations, divided into small tracts, free and clear of all incumbrances; that the respondent, believing and relying upon the representations, paid the appellant $1,000 on the purchase price of one of the tracts; that the representations were false, and that the Plantations Company, as the appellant well knew, did not own the land, but that it had only a contract of purchase which it later forfeited.

*398The appellant argues that the only issue is “the responsibility of an agent to answer to a third person for the default of a disclosed principal.” On the contrary, the issue is the liability of the appellant to answer for its own fraud. The appellant cites, in support of its contention, *Wilson v. Wold, 21*Wash. 398, *58*Pac. *223, 75 Am.*St. 346; *Nelson v. Title Trust Co., 52*Wash. *258,*100 Pac. 730, and *Davis v. Lee, 52*Wash. 330, 100 Pac. *752, 132*Am. St. 973. They have no application to the present issue. It is fundamental that a party, whether acting for himself or another, is liable in damages for his own fraud. The fact that the principal is also liable does not relieve from responsibility the party who actually commits the wrong. In such cases, the liability of the principal can only rest upon the delict of its agent. The party who has been wronged may elect to sue either or both.

The judgment is affirmed.

Rudkin, C. J., Fullerton, Parker, and Mount, JJ., concur.
# 52.205 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
52.211-17 Delivery of Excess Quantities.

As prescribed in 11.703(b), insert the following clause:

Delivery of Excess Quantities (Sept 1989)

The Contractor is responsible for the delivery of each item quantity within allowable variations, if

any. If the Contractor delivers and the Government receives quantities of any item in excess of the

quantity called for (after considering any allowable variation in quantity), such excess quantities will

be treated as being delivered for the convenience of the Contractor. The Government may retain

such excess quantities up to $250 in value without compensating the Contractor therefor, and the

Contractor waives all right, title, or interests therein. Quantities in excess of $250 will, at the option

of the Government, either be returned at the Contractor’s expense or retained and paid for by the

Government at the contract unit price.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.211 [Reserved]
#### Richard W. Osborne, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 62218.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims, entered September 14, 1979, which dismissed claimant’s personal injury claim for failure to sustain his burden of proof in establishing the State’s negligence. This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by claimant on April 5, 1978 when the tractor trailer being operated by him went off the highway. He maintains that the accident and resultant injuries were due to the negligence of the State in failing to notify him of the heaved and disturbed condition of the highway which caused him to lose control of the vehicle. After trial, the court dismissed the claim on the grounds that claimant failed to sustain his burden of proof in establishing negligence on the part of the State and that it was claimant’s operation of his own vehicle that caused the accident. This appeal ensued. Claimant had the burden of proving the State’s negligence and proximate cause by a fair preponderance of the evidence *(Boyce Motor Lines v State of New York,*280 App Div 693, affd 306 NY 801). More specifically claimant had to establish that it was the condition of the road that caused the accident *(Agius v State of New York,*50 AD2d 1049). While claimant did testify that he hit a bump in the road, the court could readily, on this record, conclude that claimant failed to sustain his burden since he also testified he thought he hit a bump and that he assumed he did. The record also contains testimony that the State posted signs warning of the bumps prior to the accident. Considering the record in its entirety, we are of the opinion that there is sufficient *732evidence to support the findings and determination of the trial court and they should not be disturbed by us. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeny, Kane, Main and Casey, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
               HOME LOAN TRUST 2006-HI4 (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer (the "Servicer")  pursuant to the Servicing  Agreement,  dated as of
September  28,  2006 (as  amended  from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),  among
Residential Funding Company, LLC (formerly Residential Funding Corporation),  as
master servicer,  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee,  and the Home
Loan Trust 2006-HI4, as the issuing entity, does hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director