alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.56



****CONFIDENTIAL PORTION has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment by the Company to, and the material has been separately filed with, the SEC.  Each omitted Confidential Portion is marked by four asterisks.


THIRTY-FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE
FULL-TIME TRANSPONDER CAPACITY AGREEMENT (PRE-LAUNCH)




This Thirty-fourth Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) (the “Thirty-third Amendment”) is made and entered into by and between INTELSAT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (“Intelsat”), and GCI COMMUNICATIONS CORP., an Alaskan corporation (“Customer”), as of the latest date set forth below.


RECITALS


WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) dated as of March 31, 2006, as amended (collectively, the “Agreement”) between Intelsat and Customer, Intelsat is providing Customer with (a) ****  transponders on **** (collectively, the “ **** Transponders” and individually, the “ **** Transponder”); (b) **** transponders on  ****  (“ **** Transponder”); (c) **** Transponder  ****; (d) **** Transponder  ****;  (e) **** Transponder  **** ” ; and (f) **** Transponder ****” as detailed in Appendix A hereto. 


WHEREAS, Customer wishes to amend **** and ****, as further detailed below;




AGREEMENT


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the sufficiency and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:




		
	1.
	Section 2, Capacity ****.  The Capacity provided on **** Transponder ****, shall be extended from **** through ****, as set forth in Appendix A hereto. 




		
	2.
	Section 3.1, **** Fee. Effective **** Customer’s **** Fee for the extended Capacity **** as defined above shall be, (i) **** reduced from **** to ****; and (ii) **** increased from **** to ****, as set forth in Appendix A.




		
	3.
	Except as specifically set forth in this Agreement, all terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties hereto has duly executed and delivered this Amendment as of the latest date set forth below (the “Execution Date”).


INTELSAT CORPORATION                GCI COMMUNICATION CORP.


By:  _/s/ Denise Olmsted   ___________            By:  _/s/ Jimmy Sipes_______________                    
Name:  _Denise Olmsted   ___________        Name:  _Jimmy Sipes_______________            


Title:  _Associate General Counsel_    __        Title:  _VP Network Services & Chief Engineer                
Date:  _December 29, 2017___________        Date:  _December 29, 2017_______________
236.701 Standard and optional forms for use

in contracting for construction or

dismantling, demolition, or removal of

improvements.

(c) Do not use Optional Form 347, Order for Supplies or Services (see 213.307 ).

Parent topic: Subpart 236.7 - STANDARD AND OPTIONAL FORMS FOR CONTRACTING FOR

CONSTRUCTION, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES, AND DISMANTLING, DEMOLITION, OR

REMOVAL OF IMPROVEMENTS
#### § 70.46 Miscellaneous.

The existence of any of the conditions set forth in § 70.35 constituting a basis for the rejection of an application for grading service.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Powerraise, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ruth Navon, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the
          operation of the Company.


/s/ Ruth Navon
--------------------------------
Ruth Navon
President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer,
Secretary and Director (principal executive,
financial and accounting officer).
March 7, 2007

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification
shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by ss.906 has been provided
to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 3:21cv171-LC-HTC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROY OTIS FLOYD,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 3:21cv171-LC-HTC

SECRETARY, 

 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

______________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on July 9, 2021

(ECF No. 12). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:21-cv-00171-LC-HTC Document 13 Filed 08/13/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:21cv171-LC-HTC

2. The petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the conviction in State 

v. Floyd, 2016-CF-4204, in the First Judicial Circuit, in and for Escambia County, 

Florida, ECF Doc. 1, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Petitioner’s 

failure to prosecute and failure to comply with Court orders.

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close 

this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of August, 2021.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:21-cv-00171-LC-HTC Document 13 Filed 08/13/21 Page 2 of 2
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION




     THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION (this “AGREEMENT EXTENSION”) is entered into effective the
13th day of May, 2009, by and between The Franklin Savings and Loan Company, a savings
and loan association organized under the laws of the State of Ohio (the “EMPLOYER”), and Thomas H
Siemers (the “EMPLOYEE”).



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, the EMPLOYEE is currently employed as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
Employer; and



     WHEREAS, the EMPLOYER and the EMPLOYEE are parties to an Employment Agreement dated October
23, 2000, and amended December 30, 2008 (the “AGREEMENT”); and



     WHEREAS, the current expiration date of the AGREEMENT is July 1, 2011 and



     WHEREAS, Section 1 of the AGREEMENT provides that the EMPLOYER’s BOARD may extend the term of
the AGREEMENT; and



     WHEREAS, as a result of the skill, knowledge, performance and experience of the EMPLOYEE, the
BOARD of the EMPLOYER has determined that the AGREEMENT should be extended; and



     WHEREAS, the EMPLOYEE desires to continue to serve as the Chairman of the Board of Directors
of the EMPLOYER and consents to the extension of the AGREEMENT;



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained, the
EMPLOYER and the EMPLOYEE hereby agree as follows:



     1. Extension of EMPLOYMENT TERM. The EMPLOYMENT TERM of the AGREEMENT is hereby
extended and the AGREEMENT shall terminate and expire on March 31, 2012.



     2. Effect of Prior Agreements. All of the terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT shall
remain in full force and effect during the EMPLOYMENT TERM, as extended by this AGREEMENT
EXTENSION.



     3. Definitions. Capitalized terms used in this AGREEMENT EXTENSION without definition
shall have the meanings given to such terms in the AGREEMENT.



[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK; SIGNATURES FOLLOW]




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the EMPLOYER has caused this AGREEMENT EXTENSION to be executed by its
duly authorized officer, and the EMPLOYEE has consented to and signed this AGREEMENT EXTENSION,
each as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	EMPLOYER

FRANKLIN
SAVINGS AND LOAN COMPANY

	 	 	EMPLOYEE

/s/
Thomas H Siemers

	

	 	 	
Name: Thomas H Siemers






	 	 	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/
Daniel T. Voelpel


 	 	 
	 	Daniel T Voelpel 	 	 
	 	Its: Senior Vice President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Willie Elmer Fuller, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed and motion granted to the extent of vacating the sentence and matter remitted to Wayne County Court for resentenee. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order of Wayne County Court which denied his *coram nobis*petition to vacate a judgment convicting him, on his plea of guilty, of the crimes of rape first degree and assault. The petition should have been granted to the extent of vacating the sentence because the court failed to comply with section 2189-a of the Penal Law when sentence was imposed upon defendant. Although the psychiatrists made the report to the court required by section 662 of the Code of Criminal Procedure certifying that defendant was not in such a state of insanity as to be incapable of understanding the charge against him or of making his defense, there was no report made complying with section 2189-a of the Penal Law containing all facts and findings necessary to assist the court in imposing sentence, as required by section 2189-a, showing defendant’s sexual inclinations and proclivities. There must be a proper psychiatric examination and report in every ease in which a sentence of from one day to life may be imposed regardless of whether such sentence is in fact imposed. *(People*v. *Spry,*5 A D 2d 835; *People*v. *Kinney,*19 A D 2d 576) and *coram nobis*will lie to vacate a sentence imposed without such an examination *(People*v. *Smith,*22 A D 2d 333; *People*v. *Mills,*18 A D 2d 960). The judgment insofar as it imposed *983sentence should be reversed and the matter remitted to Wayne County Court for resentence. Prior to resentence a psychiatric examination and report pursuant to section 2189-a of the Penal Law should be had which will provide the sentencing Judge with a current report pertinent to the statutory purpose. (Appeal from order of Wayne County Court, denying, following a hearing, motion to vacate a judgment of conviction for rape, first degree and assault second degree, rendered October 21, 1960.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1



     CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR OFFICER IN CHARGE OF THE SERVICING FUNCTION OF
     THE SERVICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Kerstin Zerbst, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
on Form 10-K of BMW FS Securities LLC and BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2006-A (the
"Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in
preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item
1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic
reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement in all material respects;

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities
required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an
exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any
material instances of non-compliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank
Trust Company Americas.



Date: March 31, 2008                            By:   /s/  Kerstin Zerbst
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                        Kerstin Zerbst
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30691]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5375-N-48]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita Perry, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: December 2, 2010.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 2010-30691 Filed 12-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
4.4

    


    


    Amendment to 2007 Equity
Incentive Plan and 2007 Stock and Award Plan

    


    (e)    transfer
of Options.

    


    (i)           No
Incentive Option granted under this Plan shall be assignable or transferable by
the grantee except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and
during the lifetime of the grantee, each ISO shall be exercisable only by him,
his guardian or legal representative.

    


    (ii)          Except
for Incentive Options, all Options are transferable subject to compliance with
applicable securities laws. Provided, however, if
the Company’s Stock is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, the
Stock shall not be sold, assigned or transferred by the grantee until at least
six months elapse from the date of the grant thereof
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

vs. CASE NO. 4:01cr47-SPM/AK

WILLIE FRANCIS,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation dated October 13, 2005 (doc. 174). Defendant has been

furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and

recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should

be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 174) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’S motion to amend (doc. 141) is granted.

3. Defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence

Case 4:01-cr-00047-MCR-AK Document 181 Filed 11/15/05 Page 1 of 2
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 118) along with the additional claim alleged

(doc. 141) is denied. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of November, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:01-cr-00047-MCR-AK Document 181 Filed 11/15/05 Page 2 of 2
118 STAT. 2210 PUBLIC LAW 108–380—OCT. 30, 2004

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3056:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108–641 (Comm. on Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Sept. 13, considered and passed House.

Oct. 11, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–380

108th Congress

An Act

To clarify the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coast Barrier Resources System

Cedar Keys Unit P25 on Otherwise Protected Area P25P.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL

BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Of the 2 maps subtitled ‘‘P25/P25P’’ that

relate to the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System

unit designated as Coastal Barrier Resources System Cedar Keys

Unit P25/P25P and are included in the set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal

Barrier Resources System’’ referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal

Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), the map depicting the

northernmost area of that unit is hereby replaced by another map

relating to that unit entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier

Resources System Cedar Keys Unit P25/P25P’’ and dated February

9, 2004.

(b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall keep

the replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal

Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

Approved October 30, 2004.

16 USC 3503

note.

Oct. 30, 2004

[H.R. 3056]
BPA/LOWER VALLEYTRANSMISSION PROJECT

Final Environmental ImpactStatement (FEIS)DOE/FEIS-0267June 1998**WELCOME**The BPA/Lower ValleyTransmission Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) isnow available. We hope its availability on the Internet is helpful toyou.The FEIS is composed of a number of separatefiles which are listed below. The files are in Portable DocumentFormat (pdf). To view the pdf files, you will need to download AdobeAcrobat Reader and then double click on the file you would like toview. The file will appear on your screen in a manner that isidentical to the printed FEIS. Appendices are not available in pdffiles. If you would like to receive hard copies of the Appendices,please call and leave a message at 1-800-622-4520.

Downloadthe latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader to view pdf files.

**FEIS FILES**

Front andBack Covers

TitlePage

Abstract

The BPA/LowerValley Transmission Project Record of Decision (ROD)

Table ofContents

Summary

Chapter 1 -Purpose and Need- The purpose and need for action- Finding solutions- Decisions to be made- Other issues

Map 1 -Location Map

Chapter 2 -Agency Proposed Action and Alternatives- Agency Proposed Action- Three Action Alternatives- No Action Alternative- Alternatives Eliminated from Consideration- Comparison of Alternatives and Summary of Impacts

Pine CreekRouting Options A, B, and C

Pine Creek Routing OptionsD and E

TetonSubstation - New Line Termination Facilities

TetonSubstation - New Facilities for the SVC Alternative

Environmental Impacts ofAlternatives

Map 2 - SampleStructure Locations

Chapter 3 -Affected Environment- Existing natural environment- Existing human environment- Protected resources

Map 3 - LandUse

Map 4 - VisualAssessment and Viewpoint Locations

Map 5 -Recreation Sites

Map 6 - USFSWilderness and Roadless Areas

Map 7 -Floodplains and Wetlands

Map 8 - SoilLimitations

Map 9 -Vegetation

Chapter 4 -Environmental Consequences- Specific impacts from alternatives- Mitigation- Cumulative impacts

Map 10 - USFSRecreation Opportunity Spectrum

Chapter 5 -Consultation, Permit and Review Requirements- Laws and procedures to follow- Consultations

Targhee Forest PlanManagement Prescriptions and Bridger-Teton Forest Plan ManagementPrescriptions

Map 11 - USFSManagement Prescriptions

Map 12 - USFSVisual Quality Objective Boundaries

Chapter 6 -Comments and Responses- Comments- Responses

Chapter 7 -DEIS Preparers

Chapter 8 -List of Agencies, Organizations and Persons Sent the EIS

Chapter 9 -References

Chapter 10- Glossary and Acronyms

Index

MetricConverstion Chart

RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE

RETURN TO BEGINNINGOF FEIS FILES
#### The State ex rel. Yarger, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Yarger v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 401.]

(No. 97-2701

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 21, 1998.)

*Philip J. Fulton & Associates*and *William A. Thorman III,*for appellant.

*402
      *Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Dennis L. Hufsiader,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, J., dissents.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

VINODH RAGHUBIR,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5879-MCR-MAF

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

 /

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the 

U.S. Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 3, that the case be transferred to the United States

District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division. The parties 

have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been 

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I have 

made a de novo determination of any objections timely filed. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections filed 

thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 3, is adopted and incorporated 

by reference in this Order. 

Case 3:20-cv-05879-MCR-MAF Document 5 Filed 11/10/20 Page 1 of 2
2. The Clerk is directed to transfer the case to the United States District Court 

for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of November 2020.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05879-MCR-MAF Document 5 Filed 11/10/20 Page 2 of 2