alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.3

Press release issued February 12, 2003

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**

**For more information, contact:**

Frederic T. Boyer Vice President & CFOQualstar Corporation (805) 583-7744 fboyer@qualstar.com

**QUALSTAR ANNOUNCES STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM**

**SIMI VALLEY,Calif., February 12, 2003** — Qualstar® Corporation (Nasdaq: QBAK), a leading manufacturer of automated tape storage solutions, announced today that its Board of Directors  has authorized a repurchase of up to 500,000shares of the company’s common stock.

Shares will be repurchased from time to time as market conditions warrant through open market transactions, block purchases, private transactions or othermeans.  The share repurchase will be funded by available working capital.  As of December 31, 2002, Qualstar had in excess of $35 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, and approximately 12.7 million sharesoutstanding.  No time limit has been set for the completion of the stock repurchase program and it may be discontinued at any time.

“We believe that our stock represents excellentlong-term value,” said William J. Gervais, chief executive officer and president.  “A repurchase reduces the dilutive impact of shares issued for options and reflects our confidence in the company’s business strategy, cash flowgeneration and growth prospects.”

**About Qualstar Corporation**Qualstar is a leading manufacturer of automated tape libraries used for backup, archival storage, data protection,disaster recovery and storage management systems. Its libraries are known throughout the world for their rugged, *Simply Reliable*design yielding years of trouble-free operation. Qualstar tape libraries are sold, installed, and supportedworldwide by selected Original Equipment Manufacturers, Value Added Resellers, and Systems Integrators. Qualstar Corporation is publicly traded on the NASDAQ Stock Exchange under the symbol QBAK. More information is available atwww.qualstar.com or by phone at 805-583-7744.

**Forward-Looking Statements**Statements in this press release concerning the future business, operating results and financial conditionof the Company are “forward-looking” statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Such statements are based upon management’s current expectations and are subject to a number of uncertaintiesthat could cause actual performance and results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.  Factors that could affect the Company’s actual results include unexpected shortages of critical components,unexpected product design or quality problems, and adverse changes in market demand for tape libraries or Qualstar’s products.  The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements whether as a result ofnew information, future events or otherwise.  Further information on these and other potential factors that could affect the Company’s financial results or condition are included in Qualstar’s filings with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.
#### § 3430.32 Preliminary application review.

Prior to technical examination, a preliminary review will be made of all applications for responsiveness to the administrative requirements set forth in the RFA. Applications that do not meet the administrative requirements may be eliminated from program competition. However, NIFA retains the right to conduct discussions with applicants to resolve technical and/or budget issues, as deemed necessary by NIFA.
#### § 58.141 Alternate quality control program.

When a plant has in operation an acceptable quality program, at the producer level, which is approved by the Administrator as being effective in obtaining results comparable to or higher than the quality program as outlined above for milk or cream, then such a program may be accepted in lieu of the program herein prescribed.
file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/sanitized%20report/sanitized%20engineering%20reports/p090253.sanitized.eng.txt [5/11/2010 1:13:25 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: PMN: 09-0253 Focus Ready Draft 3/19/2009 ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ JAS PV (kg/yr):
SUBMITTER: USE: OTHER USES: MSDS: Label: Gen Eqpt: Respirator: Health Effects: TLV/PEL:

CRSS : Chemical Name: S-H20: g/L @ VP: torr @ MW: %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:
Consumer Use: No SAT (concerns) (03/13/2009): Migration to groundwater: PBT rating: Health: Eco: OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:
EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: PMN: 09-0253file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/sanitized%20report/sanitized%20engineering%20reports/p090253.sanitized.eng.txt [5/11/2010 1:13:25 PM] Use: Number of Sites/ Location: 15 unknown site(s) Days/yr: 250 Basis: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium. Water or Incineration or Landfill High End: 6.2E+0 kg/site-day over 2 days/yr from 15 sites or 1.9E+2 kg/yr to: uncertain from: basis: Water or Incineration or Landfill Conservative: 2.7E-2 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 15 sites or 10.0E+1 kg/yr to: from: basis: RELEASE TOTAL 2.9E+2 kg/yr - all sites
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 45 Basis: The submission does not address the number of workers potentially exposed at customer sites. CEB assumes the standard default minimum of 3 workers/site (over 15 sites). Inhalation: negligible (VP < 0.001 torr)

Dermal: Exposure to Liquid at 100.00% concentration High End: 1.8E+3 mg/day over 250 days/yr Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 45 Basis:
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:04cr1-LAC

LA WANDA NALL

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on January 3, 2006

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION TO MODIFY CURRENT SENTENCE

Filed byDEFENDANT on12/30/05 Doc.# 142

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/ Travis Green

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Travis Green

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 12th day of

January, 2006, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) This Court lacks jurisdiction to modify Defendant’s sentence.

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior U.S. District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:04-cr-00001-LC-MD Document 143 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 1
52.222-29 Notification of Visa Denial.

As prescribed in 22.810(g), insert the following clause:

Notification of Visa Denial (Apr 2015)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clauseGender identity has the meaning given by the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract

Compliance Programs, and is found at http://www.dol.gov/ofccp/LGBT/LGBT_FAQs.html.

Sexual orientation has the meaning given by the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract

Compliance Programs, and is found at http://www.dol.gov/ofccp/LGBT/LGBT_FAQs.html.

(b) Requirement to notify.

(1) It is a violation of Executive Order 11246 for a Contractor to refuse to employ any applicant or

not to assign any person hired in the United States, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands,

American Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, or Wake Island, on the basis that the individual's

race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin is not compatible

with the policies of the country where or for whom the work will be performed (41 CFR 60-1.10).

(2) The Contractor shall notify the U.S. Department of State, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of PoliticalMilitary Affairs (PM), 2201 C Street NW, Room 6212, Washington, DC 20520, and the U.S.

Department of Labor, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract Compliance, when it has

knowledge of any employee or potential employee being denied an entry visa to a country where this

contract will be performed, and it believes the denial is attributable to the race, color, religion, sex,

sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin of the employee or potential employee.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
157 So.2d 233

#### Barbara Thibodaux LeCOMPTE, Individually and as Natural Tutrix, v. Fred KAY et al.

No. 46982.

Nov. 12, 1963.

In re: Barbara Thibodaux LeCompte, etc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, -to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit Parish of Terrebonne. 156''So.2d 75.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
52.223-9 Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material Content for EPA-Designated Items.       As prescribed in 23.406(d), insert the following clause:          Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material Content for EPA-Designated Items (May 2008)                                       (a)                   *Definitions*. As used in this clause-                *Postconsumer material*means a material or finished product that has served its intended use and has been discarded for disposal or recovery, having completed its life as a consumer item. Postconsumer material is a part of the broader category of "recovered material."                "Recovered material" means waste materials and by-products recovered or diverted from solid waste, but the term does not include those materials and by-products generated from, and commonly reused within, an original manufacturing process.                                          (b)                    						            The Contractor, on completion of this contract, shall-                                                         (1)                          								                Estimate the percentage of the total recovered material content for EPA-designated item(s) delivered and/or used in contract performance, including, if applicable, the percentage of post-consumer material content; and                                                            (2)  Submit this estimate to _____________________ [*Contracting Officer complete in accordance with agency procedures*].                                                                    (End of clause)          *Alternate I*                (May 2008). As prescribed in 23.406(d), redesignate paragraph (b) of the basic clause as paragraph (c) and add the following paragraph (b) to the basic clause:             (b) The Contractor shall execute the following certification required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of1976 (42 U.S.C.6962(i)(2)(C)):             Certification             I, _______________ (name of certifier), am an officer or employee responsible for the performance of this contract and hereby certify that the percentage of recovered material content for EPA-designated items met the applicable contract specifications or other contractual requirements.             __________________________________________________ [*Signature of the Officer or Employee*]             __________________________________________________ [*Typed Name of the Officer or Employee*]             __________________________________________________ [*Title*]             __________________________________________________ [*Name of Company, Firm, or Organization*]             __________________________________________________ [*Date*]             (End of certification)    **Parent topic:** 52.223 [Reserved]
162 So.2d 9

#### Nelson MEAUX v. SOUTHERN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION et al.

No. 47128.

March 30, 1964.

In re: Nelson Meaux applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 159 So.2d 156.

The application is denied. According to the facts of the case as found to be by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2011-1068; 2010-NM-189-AD Service Documents
Case 3:03-cr-00134-RV   Document 76   Filed 08/31/06   Page 1 of 8

Case 3:03-cr-00134-RV   Document 76   Filed 08/31/06   Page 2 of 8

Case 3:03-cr-00134-RV   Document 76   Filed 08/31/06   Page 3 of 8

Case 3:03-cr-00134-RV   Document 76   Filed 08/31/06   Page 4 of 8

Case 3:03-cr-00134-RV   Document 76   Filed 08/31/06   Page 5 of 8

Case 3:03-cr-00134-RV   Document 76   Filed 08/31/06   Page 6 of 8

Case 3:03-cr-00134-RV   Document 76   Filed 08/31/06   Page 7 of 8

Case 3:03-cr-00134-RV   Document 76   Filed 08/31/06   Page 8 of 8
#### LAKNER et al. v. D. J. McCAULEY CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Michael Lakner and another against the D. J. Mc-Cauley Company.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs. Order filed.
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/11/2003 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/11/2003 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/11/2003 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/11/2003 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/11/2003 Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                           4,614
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,788
<ALLOWANCES>                                        51
<INVENTORY>                                     49,191
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,589
<PP&E>                                         170,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                  95,243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,904
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        65,389
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   158,145
<SALES>                                        287,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288,021
<CGS>                                          262,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  262,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,749
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,647
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,102
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,102
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 760.613 De minimis exception. ( a ) Participants seeking the de minimis exception to the risk management purchase requirements of this subpart, must certify: ( 1 ) That a specific crop on the farm is not a crop of economic significance on the farm; or
( 2 ) That the administrative fee required for the purchase of NAP coverage for a crop exceeds 10 percent of the value of that coverage.
( b ) To be eligible for a de minimis exception to the risk management purchase requirement in § 760.104, the participant must elect such exception at the same time the participant files the application for payment and the certification of interests, as specified in § 760.620, and specify the crop or crops for which the participant is requesting such exception.
( c ) FSA will not consider the value of any crop elected under paragraph (b) of this section in calculating both the SURE guarantee and the total farm revenue.
( d ) All provisions of this subpart apply in the event a participant does not obtain an exception according to this section.
#### SPAULDING, Respondent, v. WOLFE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 17, 1906.)

Action by Carrie N. Spaulding against Harry Wolfe.

No opinion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with costs, on the authority of Fechter v. Postel (decided by this court July 24, 1906) 100 N. Y. Supp. 207.
**SERVICER        COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

| 1.   | A                  review of the activities and performance of the Administrator under                  the                  applicable administration agreement for each of the Trusts (each,                  an                  “Administration Agreement”) for the period that is the subject of                  each of the Reports has been made under the supervision of the                  undersigned; |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | To                  the best knowledge of the undersigned, based on such review, the                  Administrator has fulfilled all of its obligations under each                  Administration Agreement in all material respects throughout the                  period                  that is the subject of each of the Reports;                  and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | To                  the best knowledge of the undersigned, based on such review, there                  have                  been no failures to fulfill any such obligation in any material                  respect. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | FIRST              MARBLEHEAD DATA SERVICES,              INC. |                                       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                           |                                       |   |
|   | By:                                                            | /s/              Rosalyn Bonaventure  |   |
|   |                                                           | Rosalyn              Bonaventure           |   |
|   |                                                           | President                                  |   |
|   |                                                           |                                       |   |

----

**Schedule      A**
# L_2013323EN.01000301.xml

| 4.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 323/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 323/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1241/2013

of 25 November 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Aceite Sierra del Moncayo (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Aceite Sierra del Moncayo’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Aceite Sierra del Moncayo’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Aceite Sierra del Moncayo’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Aceite Sierra del Moncayo’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 187, 29.6.2013, p. 19.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.5.   Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oils, etc.)

SPAIN

Aceite Sierra del Moncayo (PDO)

---
§ 759.1 Administration. ( a ) This part will be administered under the general supervision and direction of the Administrator, Farm Service Agency (FSA).
( b ) FSA representatives do not have authority to modify or waive any of the provisions of the regulations of this part as amended or supplemented.
( c ) The Administrator will take any action required by the regulations of this part that the Administrator determines has not already been taken. The Administrator will also: ( 1 ) Correct or require correction of any action taken that is not in accordance with the regulations of this part; or
( 2 ) Require withholding taking any action that is not in accordance with this part.
( d ) No provision or delegation in these regulations will preclude the Administrator or a designee or other such person, from determining any question arising under this part, or from reversing or modifying any determination made under this part.
( e ) Absent a delegation to the contrary, this part will be administered by the Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs of FSA on behalf of the Administrator of FSA or the Secretary, but nothing in this part will inhibit the ability of the Administrator of FSA or the person holding the equivalent position in the event of a reorganization to delegate the functions of DAFP under these regulations to another person. Likewise, nothing shall inhibit the ability of the Secretary to reassign any duties with respect to the designations of disasters under this part.