alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 6.41 Definitions. ( a ) *Complainant* means the person who has filed with the Investigating Authority, in accordance with the procedures set forth in this subpart, a written complaint alleging that price-undercutting is occurring.
( b ) *Country of origin* means the country, as defined in 19 CFR 134.1(b), in which the quota article subject to this regulation was produced or manufactured.
( c ) *Foreign government* means the government of the country of origin or, for purposes of determining whether a subsidy has been provided for the member states of the European Economic Community, the subsidy granting bodies of the European Economic Community.
( d ) *Investigating Authority* means the Director, Dairy, Livestock and Poultry Division, Commodity Programs, Foreign Agricultural Service.
( e ) *Quota cheese* means the articles provided for in the following items of the Tariff Schedules of the United States: 117.00 (except Stilton produced in the United Kingdom); 117.05 (except Stilton produced in the United Kingdom); 117.15; 117.20; 117.25; 117.42; 117.44; 117.55; 117.60 (except Gammelost and Nokkelost); 117.75 (except goat's milk cheeses and soft-ripened cow's milk cheeses); 117.81; 117.86; 117.88 (except goat's milk cheeses and soft-ripened cow's milk cheeses);
( f ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture.
( g ) *Subsidy* has the same meaning as such term has in section 771(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as added by section 101 of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 1677(5)).
( h ) The *United States* means the Customs Territory of the United States, which is limited to the United States, District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.
#### GORE v. GLOVER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Frank E. Gore against Clare G. Glover.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order signed.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, Steven A. Schumm, the Chief Administrative Officer of Enstar Income Program II-1, L.P. (the "Partnership") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

- fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Steven A. SchummSteven A. SchummChief Administrative OfficerNovember 13, 2002
#### § 51.2000 Clean and bright.

*Clean and bright* means that the individual filbert and the lot as a whole are practically free from adhering dirt and other foreign material, and that the shells have characteristic color.
#### MORROW, v. McMAHON et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 25, 1906.)

Action by Samuel H. Morrow against Mary McMahon and others.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Order filed.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2801 

To amend chapters 83 and 84 of title 5, United States Code, to authorize 

payments to certain trusts under the Social Security Act, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2006 

Mr. ALLARD (for himself and Mr. SALAZAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend chapters 83 and 84 of title 5, United States 

Code, to authorize payments to certain trusts under the 

Social Security Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN PAYMENTS 

4 UNDER THE CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT 

5 SYSTEM AND THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEES RE6 TIREMENT SYSTEM TO CERTAIN TRUSTS 

7 UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT. 

8 (a) CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM.— 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2801 IS

1 (1) PAYMENTS.—Section 8345(e) of title 5, 

2 United States Code, is amended in the first sentence 

3 by inserting before the period ‘‘, or is a trustee 

4 under a trust meeting the requirements of subpara5 graph (A) or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social 

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4) (A) or (C))’’. 

7 (2) ASSIGNABILITY OF PAYMENTS.—Section 

8 8346(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended 

9 by striking ‘‘except under’’ and inserting ‘‘except to 

10 a trust meeting the requirements of subparagraph 

11 (A) or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social Secu12 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4) (A) or (C)) or 

13 under’’. 

14 (b) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM.— 

15 (1) PAYMENTS.—Section 8466(c) of title 5, 

16 United States Code, is amended in the first sentence 

17 by inserting before the period ‘‘, or is a trustee 

18 under a trust meeting the requirements of subpara19 graph (A) or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social 

20 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4) (A) or (C))’’. 

21 (2) ASSIGNABILITY OF PAYMENTS.—Section 

22 8470(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended 

23 by striking ‘‘except under’’ and inserting ‘‘except to 

24 a trust meeting the requirements of subparagraph 

25 (A) or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social SecuVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:27 May 16, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2801.IS S2801

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
3 

•S 2801 IS

1 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4) (A) or (C)) or 

2 under’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Harmon S. Auguste, Deceased. Colonial Farbics, Inc., et al., Appellants; Edmund W. Bokat, as Executor of Estelle S. Auguste, Deceased, et al., as Executors of Harmon S. Auguste, Deceased, Respondents.

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court,' Westchester County, dated October 15, 1965, affirmed insofar as appealed from, upon the opinion of the learned Surrogate [52 Misc 2d 157], with one bill of costs to the respondent who filed a brief, payable by appellants personally. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., TJghetta, Christ, Hill and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
#### § 630.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this subchapter is to provide for programs to extend cost sharing and technical assistance through long term contracts to landowners and others for making land use changes and to install measures to conserve, develop, and utilize the soil, water, and related natural resources on their lands.

[40 FR 53370, Nov. 18, 1975]
Case 4:73-cv-00177-WS Document 2 Filed 11/25/03 Page 1 of 12
Case 4:73-cv-00177-WS Document 2 Filed 11/25/03 Page 2 of 12
Case 4:73-cv-00177-WS Document 2 Filed 11/25/03 Page 3 of 12
Case 4:73-cv-00177-WS Document 2 Filed 11/25/03 Page 4 of 12
Case 4:73-cv-00177-WS Document 2 Filed 11/25/03 Page 5 of 12
Case 4:73-cv-00177-WS Document 2 Filed 11/25/03 Page 6 of 12
Case 4:73-cv-00177-WS Document 2 Filed 11/25/03 Page 7 of 12
Case 4:73-cv-00177-WS Document 2 Filed 11/25/03 Page 8 of 12
Case 4:73-cv-00177-WS Document 2 Filed 11/25/03 Page 9 of 12
Case 4:73-cv-00177-WS Document 2 Filed 11/25/03 Page 10 of 12
Case 4:73-cv-00177-WS Document 2 Filed 11/25/03 Page 11 of 12
Case 4:73-cv-00177-WS Document 2 Filed 11/25/03 Page 12 of 12
#### § 654.31 Performing operation and maintenance.

The method of performing O&M is to be at the option of the land user. The NRCS, working through districts, will furnish information and technical assistance as needed and requested to the extent NRCS resources permit.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

IN RE SKANSKA USA CIVIL 

SOUTHEAST INC. AND 

SKANSKA USA, INC. AS 

OWNERS OF THE BARGE KS 

5331, PRAYING FOR 

EXONERATION 

FROM OR LIMITATION 

OF LIABILITY 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

ADMIRALTY RULE 9(H) 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 

3:20-CV-05980-LC-HTC 

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 

LACEY COLLIER 

NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY 

 Since the conclusion of the briefing on Claimants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack 

of Jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), Claimants have 

discovered an additional case authority on the issue of the appropriate manner in 

which to characterize “the general character of the activity giving rise to the 

incident” for the second part of the connection test as set out by Grubart v. Great 

Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 513 U.S. 527 (1995). 

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1187 Filed 06/17/21 Page 1 of 4
 The case authority is Dredging Supply Rental, Inc. v. USA Debusk, LLC, 2018 

WL 3819902 (E.D.La. Aug. 10, 2018) and is attached as Ex. A to this Notice. 

DATE: June 17, 2021 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Brian H. Barr 

Brian H. Barr 

Levin Papantonio Rafferty Proctor 

Buchanan O’Brien Barr & Mougey, P.A. 

316 S. Baylen Street, Suite 600 

Pensacola, FL 32502 

E. Samuel Geisler 

Aylstock Witkin Kreis & Overholtz, PLLC 

17 East Main Street 

Second Floor 

Pensacola, FL 32502 

Thomas F. Gonzalez 

Beggs & Lane, RLLP 

501 Commendencia Street 

Pensacola, FL 32502 

 

 

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1187 Filed 06/17/21 Page 2 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE AS TO WORD COUNT 

 I hereby certify that, as required by Local Rule 7.1 (F), this Notice of 

Supplemental Authority contains 103 words and thus complies with Local Rule 

7.1(J). 

 /s/ Brian H. Barr 

 BRIAN H. BARR 

 

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1187 Filed 06/17/21 Page 3 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that on June 17, 2021, a true and correct 

copy of the foregoing Notice of Supplemental Authority was served on all parties 

through the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system. 

 /s/ Brian H. Barr 

 BRIAN H. BARR 

 

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1187 Filed 06/17/21 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 33.4


                     REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH
                     ss.1122(d)(2)(vi) and ss.1122(d)(4)(xi)
                       of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA


American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and
Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc.,
collectively the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance as
of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006 through December
31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in
ss.1122(d)(2)(vi), ss.1122(d)(4)(xi) and ss.1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17,
ss.229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, which the Asserting Party has
concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it
performs with respect to all mortgage loan-tracking transactions covered by this
report. The transactions covered by this report include all mortgage
loan-tracking transactions for which the Asserting Party served as a Vendor on
behalf of Servicers for such asset-backed securities transactions that were
registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"). The scope of the
Asserting Party assertions excludes ss.1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17,
ss.229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, which relates to servicing
activities that are performed by the Asserting Party with respect to the
Platform, but are not reported on herein.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with ss.1122(d)(2)(vi) and
ss.1122(d)(4)(xi) ("the Applicable Servicing Criteria") for the Reporting Period
and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material
respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with
respect to the Platform taken as a whole. The Asserting Party used the criteria
set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period ending December
31, 2006 as set forth in this assertion.

     American Security Insurance Company
     Standard Guaranty Insurance Company
     Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.


     /s/ John Frobose

     By: John Frobose
     Senior Vice President


     Date: February 23, 2007
**CERTIFICATIONS

**Exhibit 31.2  **Certification of Principal Accounting and Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **CERTIFICATIONS
I, Lawrence A. Heilbronner, certify that: 
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Canandaigua National Corporation; 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosures controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  
(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  
(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

November 4, 2004 
/s/ Lawrence A. Heilbronner
Date 
Lawrence A. Heilbronner, Principal Financial and  
Accounting Officer********
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Video Display Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the
registrants internal controls over
financial reporting.
 Date: July 15, 2008
    /s/ Gregory L. OsbornGregory L. OsbornChief Financial Officer
# L_2014283EN.01005601.xml

| 27.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 283/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 283/56

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 25 September 2014

appointing a Czech alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2014/676/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the CzechGovernment,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. On 24 September 2012, by Council Decision 2012/524/EU (3), Mr Milan CHOVANEC was appointed alternate member until 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. On 24 September 2012, by Council Decision 2012/524/EU (3), Mr Milan CHOVANEC was appointed alternate member until 25 January 2015.

| (2) | An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Milan CHOVANEC, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Milan CHOVANEC,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Mr Václav ŠLAJS, Hejtman Plzeňského kraje. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Václav ŠLAJS, Hejtman Plzeňského kraje.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2014.

For the Council

The President

F. GUIDI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 263, 28.9.2012, p. 41.

3

---
#### § 70.54 Retention authorities.

A grader may use retention tags or other devices and methods as approved by the Administrator for the identification and control of poultry or rabbit products which are not in compliance with the regulations or are held for further examination. Any such item shall not be released until in compliance with the regulations and retention identification shall not be removed by anyone other than a grader.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2271

ABRAHAM SANGARY, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A96-288-990) Submitted: May 31, 2006 Decided: June 14, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abraham Sangary, Petitioner Pro Se. Larry Patrick Cote, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Abraham Mohamed Sangary, a native and citizen of Liberia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Sangary fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Sangary cannot meet the higher standard to qualify for withholding of removal. Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). In addition, we uphold the IJ’s finding that Sangary failed to establish that it was more likely than not that he would be tortured if removed to Liberia. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
#### In re FARLEY, State Com'r of Excise.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 7, 1914.)

In the matter of the petition of William W. Farley, as State Commissioner of Excise, for an order revoking and canceling liquor tax certificate No. 16468, issued to John W. Sage, and transferred to T. A. Jones and another, etc.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.