alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, December 7, 2010, at 9 a.m.

# Place:

Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters To Be Considered:

Tuesday, December 7, at 9 a.m. (Closed)

1. Financial Matters.

2. Pricing.

3. Strategic Issues.

4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.

5. Governors' Executive Session—Discussion of prior agenda items and Board Governance.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-30667 Filed 12-2-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**ANNUAL
        STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**
 
 **Merrill
        Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series 2006-HE5**
 
 **2006**
  The
        undersigned, an authorized officer of LaSalle Bank National Association
        (“LBNA”), hereby certifies as follows:
  1.     I
        have made, or caused to be made under my supervision, a review of
        the master servicing activities of LBNA during the preceding calendar year
        ending 2006, and its performance under the Pooling and Servicing agreement
        dated
        as of September 1, 2006 (the “Agreement”) for Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors
        Trust, Series 2006-HE5.
 
 2.     To
        the best of my knowledge, based on such review, LBNA has, without exception,
        fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
        throughout the preceding calendar year ending 2006.
  In
        witness
        whereof, I the undersigned have executed this Annual Statement of Compliance
        on
        this 7th day of March, 2007.
 
 
 LaSalle
        Bank National Association, as Master
        Servicer
 
  By:
/s/
        Andrew Leszczynski
  Name:
        Andrew Leszczynski
 Title:
        First Vice President
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eye Care centers of America, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas C. Shepard, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                 |  |                                                     
|---------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|October 06, 2006 |  | /s/ Douglas C. Shepard                              
|                 |  | Douglas C. Shepard                                  
|                 |  | Executive Vice President And Chief Financial Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EYE CARE CENTERS OF
AMERICA, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Eleanor O’Connor, Respondent, v. Daniel C. O’Connor, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 16, 1967, reversed, on the law, without costs; appellant’s motion (1) to vacate the order of said court dated December 30, 1966 adjudging him in contempt of court and (2) in effect, upon such vacatur, to deny respondent’s previous motion to adjudge appellant in contempt granted; and proceeding remitted to the Special Term for an immediate hearing on the issue of custody of the infant daughter of the parties. Appellant is directed to produce the infant at such time and place as the Special Term may fix for such hearing. No questions of fact have been considered. In our opinion, while appellant’s conduct at Special Term is not condenable, the basis for the punishment specified in the contempt order was a violation by the child’s paternal grandfather, who by prior order of the court had been designated as the child’s custodian. We are further of the opinion that, under the circumstances adduced, and in view of the death of the paternal grandfather-custodian, the interests of justice would best be served by an immediate custody hearing at which the respective rights of the parties may be determined *de novo.*Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 248 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 248

 To amend title 23, United States Code, to permit States to carry out 
   surface transportation program projects on local roads to address 
                            safety concerns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2005

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, to permit States to carry out 
   surface transportation program projects on local roads to address 
                            safety concerns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Surface Transportation Adaptability 
to Ensure Safety (STATES) Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. LOCATION OF SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM PROJECTS.

     Section 133(c) of title 23, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Except'' and inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--Except''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Safety projects.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a 
        State may undertake a surface transportation program project on 
        any State-maintained public road, including a road functionally 
        classified as a local or rural minor collector, if the State 
        determines that the project is necessary to address high 
        fatality rates or other safety concerns.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 37 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 1
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVID RASHAUN HAMIL, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-3328

[May 23, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432020CF001223A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. SolagesJones, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7102
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL WOODS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-93-46, CA-94-170-2) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr., Assis tant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. With regard to the alleged sentencing errors, we find that Appellant may not assert those nonconstitutional errors in a collateral proceeding because he did not raise them on direct appeal. See Stone v. Powell , 428 U.S. 465, 477 n.10 (1976). Accordingly, we affirm the denial of relief of Appellant's sentencing claims on that basis. With regard to Appellant's remaining claims, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Woods , Nos. CR-93-46; CA-94-170-2 (N.D.W. Va. June 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.15.1




TERMINATION OF 
LIMITED LIABILTY COMPANY AGREEMENT
OF
TAUBMAN PROPERTIES ASIA II LLC 


THIS TERMINATION OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT OF TAUBMAN PROPERTIES ASIA II LLC (“Termination”) is entered into as of February 22, 2018, between TAUBMAN ASIA MANAGEMENT II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“T-Asia”), RENÉ TREMBLAY (“Tremblay”), and PETER JOHN SHARP (“Sharp”).
A.T-Asia, Tremblay, and Sharp entered into that certain Limited Liability Company Agreement of Taubman Properties Asia I LLC, dated as of September 1, 2016 (the “Agreement”).
B.T-Asia, Tremblay, and Sharp desire to terminate the Agreement and dissolve Taubman Properties Asia II LLC.
NOW, THEREFORE, T-Asia, Tremblay and Sharp hereby acknowledge and agree that the Agreement is terminated on the date hereof and the Agreement is of no further force or effect whatsoever.
For purposes of this Termination, the delivery of a signature hereto by facsimile or other electronic format shall be deemed the same as the delivery of an original signature.  This Termination may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and together which shall constitute one and the same document.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Termination as of the date first-above written.


TAUBMAN ASIA MANAGEMENT II LLC,
a Delaware limited liability 




By:      /s/ Chris B. Heaphy                            
Chris B. Heaphy
Its:    Authorized Signatory






 /s/ René Tremblay                                            
RENÉ TREMBLAY






 /s/ Peter John Sharp                                         
PETER JOHN SHARP
##### 



Exhibit 32.7
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Brookshire Raw Materials (U.S.) Metals CDN Fund, a series of the
Brookshire Raw Materials (U.S.) Trust.
 /s/ John MarshallJohn MarshallChief Executive Officer of Brookshire Raw
Materials Management, LLC, the Managing Owner
of Brookshire Raw Materials (U.S.) Trust/s/ Stephen AdamsStephen AdamsChief Financial Officer of  Brookshire Raw
Materials Management, LLC, the Managing Owner
of Brookshire Raw Materials (U.S.) Trust
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Wayne Black )

)

)

vs. ) CV NO. 1:03CV734-MEF

)

) Jury Trial: 10/2/06 - 10/3/06

Lamar Glover, et al. Before: Hon. Mark E. Fuller 

WITNESS LIST

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT 

Lamar Glover

Commander Bowers

Officer Roberts

Officer Turner

Dr. Banner

Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 46-3 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.4

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made as of February 27, 2018, by and between EagleBank (the “Bank”) and the Executive named below.

 

RECITAL:

 

Bank has retained Executive as an executive officer, pursuant to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 31, 2017 (the “Agreement”). The parties desire to amend the Agreement to provide for clarity in how to apply IRC Section 280G to the extent applicable.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1.                                      Section 10.1 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted in lieu thereof:

 

10.1                        Section 280G

 

If any of the payments or benefits received or to be received by the Executive (including, without limitation, any payment or benefits received in connection with a Change in Control or the Executive’s termination of employment, whether pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or any other plan, arrangement or agreement, or otherwise) (all such payments collectively referred to herein as the “280G Payments”) constitute “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code and would, but for this Section 10.1, be subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code (the “Excise Tax”), then prior to making the 280G Payments, the 280G Payments shall be reduced to the minimum extent necessary to ensure that no portion of the 280G Payments is subject to the Excise Tax.  In applying the foregoing limitation,  benefits shall be reduced so as to maximize the economic value payable to the Executive and, if two economically equivalent amounts are subject to reduction but are payable at different times, the amounts shall be reduced (but not below zero) on a pro rata basis.

 











 

2.              But for the above change, the Agreement remains in full force and effect, unmodified.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement as of the date first written above.

 

	
EAGLEBANK
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By: 
    	
/s/   Ronald D. Paul
    	
 
    
	
Name:   Ronald D. Paul
    	
 
    
	
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
    	
 
    
	
Date:   February 27, 2018
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Executive
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Susan G. Riel
    	
 
    
	
Name: Susan G. Riel
    	
 
    
	
Title: Senior Executive Vice President - Chief   Operating Officer
    	
 
    
	
Date: February 6, 2018
    	
 
    
			


 

2
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bond Laboratories, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Abrams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By /s/ Michael Abrams


Michael Abrams


Chief Financial officer


April 15, 2011
EXHIBIT
10.1

    Term Loan
Agreement

    


    Party A
(hereinafter referred to as the “Lender”):  Tianjin Tiens Life
Resources Co., Ltd.

    


    Party B
(hereinafter referred to as the “Borrower”):  Tianjin Tianshi
Biological Engineering Co., Ltd.

    


    The
Lender and the Borrower have reached and signed a loan agreement which should be
observed by both parties.

    


    The
Borrower agrees to pay interest on the balance, as of March 31, 2009, of the
Lender’s Other Receivables-related parties that originated from the Borrower and
were transferred from the Lender’s Accounts Receivable – related
parties.  The related terms are stipulated as follows:

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              1.

            	
              The
      amount of the loan: RMB 17,538,448 (US$
  2,562,017);

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              2.

            	
              The
      term of the loan agreement: from April 1, 2009 to June 30,
      2009;

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              3.

            	
              The
      type of the loan: short-term loan;

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              4.

            	
              The
      interest of the loan: at a rate for the same level and same period of loan
      stipulated by the People’s Bank of China on April 1, 2009
      (4.86%);

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              5.

            	
              With
      approval from the Lender, the Borrower can pay off the loan before June
      30, 2009. The interest of the loan shall be calculated until the day on
      which the principal of the loan is repaid, and no fine shall be imposed on
      the Borrower for advancing the repayment of the
  loan.

            


    

    


    
      
        	
                The
      Lender:

              	 
      	
                The
      Borrower:

              
	
                Tianjin
      Tiens Life Resources  Co., Ltd

              	 
      	
                Tianjin
      Tianshi Biological Engineering  Co., Ltd

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                By

              	/s/
      Yiqun Wu  	 
      	
                By

              	
                /s/ Jinyuan Li

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                Title:  

              	
                  Authorized
      Representative

              	 
      	
                Title:  

              	
                Authorized
Representative

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                April
      21, 2009

              	 
      	
                April
      21, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MARCUS MOTON,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5950/MCR/EMT

SKANSKA USA CIVIL

SOUTHEAST, INC.,

Defendant.

_____________________/

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed a second amended 

employment discrimination complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (Title 

VII of the Civil Rights Act) (ECF No. 8). Upon review of Plaintiff’s allegations, 

it appears service of the second amended complaint is appropriate. Because 

Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, he is not responsible for the costs of 

service. Plaintiff is responsible, however, for providing the court with a copy of 

the second amended complaint, which must be identical to the second amended 

complaint filed with the court. This case number should be included on the copy.

Before service can be directed, Plaintiff also must submit a summons and a 

prepared USM 285 form for Defendant Skanska USA Civil Southeast, Inc. Once 

Plaintiff does so, the United States Marshals Service (USMS) will serve the 

complaint.

Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 9 Filed 03/29/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cv5950/MCR/EMT

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk of court is directed to forward Plaintiff one summons and one 

blank USM 285 form.

2. Within twenty-one days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must submit 

the summons and completed USM 285 form, along with the service copy of the

second amended complaint, to the clerk. 

3. Upon receipt of the summons, completed USM 285 form, and copy of 

the second amended complaint, the clerk must issue the summons and return it, along 

with a certified copy of this order, the service copy of the second amended 

complaint, and the prepared USM 285 form, to the USMS.

4. The USMS must serve a copy of the second amended complaint and 

summons upon Skanska USA Civil Southeast, Inc.

5. Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with this order as instructed 

may result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute 

or failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of March 2021.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 9 Filed 03/29/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RODRIQUEZ PORTER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:03cv595/MCR/MD

TRANS UNION LLC,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated March 25, 2005. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of

the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The defendant’s motion for summary judgment (doc. 48) is GRANTED,

and the clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendant and close the

file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of April, 2005.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-00595-MCR-MD Document 72 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 1
# L_2014168EN.01012201.xml

| 7.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 168/122 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 168/122

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 12/2014 of 8 January 2014 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed [Salinātā rudzu rupjmaize (TSG)]

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 4 of 9 January 2014
  )

On page 41, Annex:

for:

‘Class 2.4. Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker's wares’,

read:

‘Class 2.3. Confectionery, bread, pastry, cakes, biscuits and other baker's wares’.

---