alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
45.107 Contract clauses.

(a)

(1) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the contracting officer shall insert the clause

at 52.245-1, Government Property, in-

(i) All cost-reimbursement and time-and-material type solicitations and contracts, and labor-hour

solicitations when property is expected to be furnished for the labor-hour contracts.

(ii) Fixed-price solicitations and contracts when the Government will provide Government property.

(iii) Contracts or modifications awarded under FAR part 12 procedures where Government property

that exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, as defined in FAR 2.101, is furnished or where the

contractor is directed to acquire property for use under the contract that is titled in the Government.

(2) The contracting officer shall use the clause with its Alternate I in contracts other than those

identified in FAR 45.104(a), Responsibility and Liability for Government Property.

(3) The contracting officer shall use the clause with its Alternate II when a contract for the conduct

of basic or applied research at nonprofit institutions of higher education or at nonprofit

organizations whose primary purpose is the conduct of scientific research (see 35.014) is

contemplated.

(b) The contracting officer shall also insert the clause at 52.245-2, Government Property (Installation

Operation Services), in fixed-price service contracts to be performed on a Government installation

when Government-furnished property will be provided for initial provisioning only and the

Government is not responsible for repair or replacement.

(c) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.245-9, Use and Charges, in solicitations and

contracts when the clause at 52.245-1 is included.

(d) Purchase orders for property repair need not include a Government property clause when the

unit acquisition cost of Government property to be repaired does not exceed the simplified

acquisition threshold, unless other Government property (not for repair) is provided.

Parent topic: Subpart 45.1 - General
§ 714.36 Definitions. ( a ) *General terms.* In determining the meaning of the provisions of this part, unless the context indicates otherwise, words imparting the singular include and apply to several persons or things, words imparting the plural include the singular, words imparting the masculine gender include the feminine as well, and words used in the present tense include the future as well as the present. The definitions in part 719 of this chapter shall apply to this part. The provisions of part 720 of this chapter concerning the expiration of time limitations shall apply to this part.
( b ) *Other terms applicable to this part.* The following terms shall have the following meanings: ( 1 ) “Act” means the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, and any amendments or supplements thereto.
( 2 ) “Claim” means a written request for refund of penalty.
( 3 ) “Claimant” means a person who makes a claim for refund of penalty as provided in this part.
( 4 ) “County Office” means the office of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation County Committee.
( 5 ) “Penalty” means an amount of money collected, including setoff, from or on account of any person with respect to any commodity to which this part is applicable, which has been covered into the general fund of the Treasury of the United States, as provided in section 372(b) of the Act.
( 6 ) “State office” means the office of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation State Committee.
52.243-4 Changes.

As prescribed in 43.205(d), insert the following clause: The 30-day period may be varied according

to agency procedures.

Changes (June 2007)

(a) The Contracting Officer may, at any time, without notice to the sureties, if any, by written order

designated or indicated to be a change order, make changes in the work within the general scope of

the contract, including changes-

(1) In the specifications (including drawings and designs);

(2) In the method or manner of performance of the work;

(3) In the Government-furnished property or services; or

(4) Directing acceleration in the performance of the work.

(b) Any other written or oral order (which, as used in this paragraph (b), includes direction,

instruction, interpretation, or determination) from the Contracting Officer that causes a change shall

be treated as a change order under this clause; Provided, that the Contractor gives the Contracting

Officer written notice stating-

(1) The date, circumstances, and source of the order; and

(2) That the Contractor regards the order as a change order.

(c) Except as provided in this clause, no order, statement, or conduct of the Contracting Officer shall

be treated as a change under this clause or entitle the Contractor to an equitable adjustment.

(d) If any change under this clause causes an increase or decrease in the Contractor’s cost of, or the

time required for, the performance of any part of the work under this contract, whether or not

changed by any such order, the Contracting Officer shall make an equitable adjustment and modify

the contract in writing. However, except for an adjustment based on defective specifications, no

adjustment for any change under paragraph (b) of this clause shall be made for any costs incurred

more than 20 days before the Contractor gives written notice as required. In the case of defective

specifications for which the Government is responsible, the equitable adjustment shall include any

increased cost reasonably incurred by the Contractor in attempting to comply with the defective

specifications.

(e) The Contractor must assert its right to an adjustment under this clause within 30 days after (1)

receipt of a written change order under paragraph (a) of this clause or (2) the furnishing of a written

notice under paragraph (b) of this clause, by submitting to the Contracting Officer a written

statement describing the general nature and amount of the proposal, unless this period is extended

by the Government. The statement of proposal for adjustment may be included in the notice under

paragraph (b) of this clause.

(f) No proposal by the Contractor for an equitable adjustment shall be allowed if asserted after final

payment under this contract.
(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.243 [Reserved]
§ 65.135 Covered commodity. ( a ) *Covered commodity* means: ( 1 ) Muscle cuts of lamb, chicken, and goat;
( 2 ) Ground lamb, ground chicken, and ground goat;
( 3 ) Perishable agricultural commodities;
( 4 ) Peanuts;
( 5 ) Macadamia nuts;
( 6 ) Pecans; and
( 7 ) Ginseng.
( b ) Covered commodities are excluded from this part if the commodity is an ingredient in a processed food item as defined in § 65.220.
[74 FR 2704, Jan. 15, 2009, as amended at 81 FR 10761, Mar. 2, 2016]
§ 789.33 Controlling the general distribution of a material in the civilian market. ( a ) No allocations by USDA may be used to control the general distribution of a material in the civilian market, unless the Secretary has: ( 1 ) Made a written finding that: ( i ) Such material is a scarce and critical material essential to the national defense; and
( ii ) The requirements of the national defense for such material cannot otherwise be met without creating a significant dislocation of the normal distribution of such material in the civilian market to such a degree as to create appreciable hardship;
( 2 ) Submitted the finding for the President's approval through the Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor and the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism; and
( 3 ) The President has approved the finding.
( b ) [Reserved]
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO NORTHPORT CAPITAL, INCORPORATEDFORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the CFO of Northport Capital, Inc., a Colorado corporation
(the Company). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form
10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (Form 10-K).

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that the Form
10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 28, 2008

| | BY: | /s/ James Wang
| | --- | --------------
| |     | James Wang    
| |     | CFO           

---
## Publications List

Series:Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems

##   Use Search Filters  

### Select Filters

### Enter search criteria

### Sort by

Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems, 2020Date Published  December 2022SeriesSurvey of State Criminal History Information SystemsPublication TypeThird-Party Report, Report (Grant-Sponsored)AgenciesBJS-Sponsored

Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems, 2018 Date Published  November 2020SeriesSurvey of State Criminal History Information SystemsPublication TypeThird-Party Report, Report (Grant-Sponsored)AgenciesBJS-Sponsored

Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems, 1999Date Published  October 2000SeriesSurvey of State Criminal History Information SystemsPublication TypePublication, Third-Party Report

Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems, 1997Date Published  April 1999SeriesSurvey of State Criminal History Information SystemsPublication TypePublication, Third-Party Report

Survey of Criminal History Information Systems: Implementing the Lautenberg AmendmentDate Published  June 1998SeriesSurvey of State Criminal History Information SystemsPublication TypePublication

Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems, 1995Date Published  April 1999SeriesSurvey of State Criminal History Information SystemsPublication TypePublication, Third-Party Report

Survey of Criminal History Information Systems, 1993, with Supplementary Information on Presale Firearms Checks, 1994Date Published  January 1995SeriesSurvey of State Criminal History Information SystemsPublication TypePublication, Third-Party Report

Survey of Criminal History Information Systems, 1993, With Supplementary Information on Presale Firearm Checks, 1994Date Published  January 1995SeriesSurvey of State Criminal History Information SystemsPublication TypePublication

Survey of Criminal History Information Systems, 1992Date Published  November 1993SeriesSurvey of State Criminal History Information SystemsPublication TypePublication

Survey of Criminal History Information SystemsDate Published  March 1991SeriesSurvey of State Criminal History Information SystemsPublication TypePublication

## Side navigation

-  Just the Stats 
-  Search Publications 
-  Forthcoming Publications 
-  Research and Third-party Reports 
-  Data Corrections 

**Interested in Statistics?**

Sign up for email notices of new crime and justice statistical materials as they become available from BJS.

Subscribe
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Zogenix, Inc. (the Company) for the period
ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ann D. Rhoads, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 27, 2015 |  | /s/ Ann D. Rhoads      
|                     |  | Ann D. Rhoads          
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### § 51.39 Fees for appeal inspections.

The fee to be charged to an applicant, including any Government agency, for appeal inspections on all products shall be at the same rate as those set forth in this part, except that when a material error is found in the determination of the original inspection, no fee will be charged.

[56 FR 55800, Oct. 30, 1991]
Exhibit 31.1





PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION





I, Boris Rubizhevsky, certify that:





(1)    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Alliance Network Communications Holdings, Inc..;





(2)    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





(3)    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





(4)    The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have:





(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon based such evaluation; and





(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;





(5)    The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting.





Dated: May 14 , 2010
By:
/s/ Boris RubizhevskyBoris Rubizhevsky

Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2761 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2761

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to acquire land for the purpose 
    of expanding Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2006

Mr. Allard (for himself and Mr. Salazar) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Army to acquire land for the purpose 
    of expanding Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE LAND FOR THE EXPANSION OF PINON CANYON 
              MANEUVER SITE.

    (a) Authority.--The Secretary of the Army may, subject to 
subsections (b) and (c), after consulting with the congressional 
defense committees, and using funds previously appropriated for such 
purpose, acquire for not more than fair market value any and all right, 
title, and interest in and to one or more parcels of real property 
located near Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site (in this section referred to as 
the ``Site'') for the purpose of expanding the Site.
    (b) Limitation on Expansion.--The Secretary of the Army may not 
acquire real property under subsection (a) to expand the Site if such 
acquisition would require the condemnation of such property, the 
seizure by a Federal entity of any private property, or the exercise by 
a Federal or State governmental entity of eminent domain authority.
    (c) Study Required.--The Secretary of the Army may not acquire real 
property under subsection (a) until the Secretary has submitted to the 
congressional defense committees a study on--
            (1) the economic impact on local communities of such 
        acquisition;
            (2) the environmental impact of expanding the Site pursuant 
        to subsection (a); and
            (3) the costs associated with potential environmental 
        restoration, waste management, and other environmental 
        activities in connection with such acquisition and expansion.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The term ``congressional defense committees'' means the 
        Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Appropriations 
        of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the 
        Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
            (2) The term ``fair market value'' means, with respect to a 
        parcel of land, the value of such parcel as determined by an 
        appraisal performed by an independent, certified appraiser in 
        accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal 
        Practice.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 29.3035 Leaf structure.

The cell development of a leaf as indicated by its porosity or solidity. (See Elements of quality.)

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1186

WILLIAM WHITTMAN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ASSOCIA, ASSOCIATIONS, INC.; CMC, (Community Management 

Corporation); WOODBURN VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS 

ASSOCIATION AND/OR WOODBURN VLG CONDO UNIT OWNERS, (The 

Association),

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:21-cv-00077-RDA-TCB)

Submitted: July 21, 2022 Decided: July 25, 2022

Before MOTZ, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Whittman, Appellant Pro Se. Michelle Benitez Jessee, Hanover, Maryland, 

William Leonard Mitchell, II, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1186 Doc: 16 Filed: 07/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

William Whittman appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion 

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Whittman v. Associa, Ass’ns, Inc., No. 1:21-cv-00077-RDA-TCB (E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 

2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1186 Doc: 16 Filed: 07/25/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DUE PROCESS, LTD., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:03cv580/MCR/MD

ALTERNATIVE DEBT SERVICES,

INC., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's reportand

recommendation dated October 10, 2006. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report andrecommendation and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The Stipulated Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (doc. 105) is GRANTED,

and plaintiffs’ claims against defendant Patrick Olive are DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of November, 2006.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 109 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 1 of 1

DUE PROCESS LTD et al v. ALTERNATIVE DEBT SERVICES INC et al Doc. 109

Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

POLLEDO ROGELIO, 

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO. 5:03cv315-SPM/AK

WARDEN MONICA WETZEL &

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondents.

____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation dated September 22, 2005 (doc. 7). Petitioner has been

furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and

recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should

be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 7) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Case 5:03-cv-00315-SPM-AK Document 11 Filed 11/18/05 Page 1 of 2
is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of November, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 5:03-cv-00315-SPM-AK Document 11 Filed 11/18/05 Page 2 of 2