UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  Form 10-QSB/A

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
         OF 1934

                 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
         OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14099


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                             94-2940204
(State or other jurisdiction of                              (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                             Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)


The issuer  recently  discovered  that it had  inadvertently  omitted  conformed
signatures on certain certifications included in its 10-QSB filing made November
14, 2002.  Original  signatures were complete and on file with the issuer at the
time the 10-QSB filing was made in November;  however,  due to a clerical error,
conformed  signatures were not included in the electronic filing. This amendment
is being filed solely to correct this inadvertent clerical error.

                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                               September 30, 2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $ 170
   Receivables and deposits                                                      32
   Other assets                                                                 126
   Investment property:
      Land                                                    $ 916
      Buildings and related personal property                 10,246
                                                              11,162
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (5,537)         5,625

                                                                            $ 5,953
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficit) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 33
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           73
   Accrued property taxes                                                        97
   Other liabilities                                                            147
   Due to affiliates                                                             27
   Mortgage note payable                                                      5,230

Partners' (Deficit) Capital
   General partner                                             $ (2)
   Special limited partners                                      (76)
   Limited partners (181,300 units issued and
      outstanding)                                               424            346

                                                                            $ 5,953

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          Three Months               Nine Months
                                       Ended September 30,       Ended September 30,
                                        2002         2001         2002         2001

   Revenues:
<S>                                    <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
      Rental income                    $ 446        $ 411        $ 1,313      $ 1,183
      Other income                         70           51           177          141
      Casualty gain (Note D)               --           --            18           --
          Total revenues                  516          462         1,508        1,324

   Expenses:
      Operating                           204          283           575          671
      General and administrative           41           41           121          183
      Depreciation                        112          107           337          325
      Interest                            105          106           319          313
      Property taxes                       38           19           106           74
          Total expenses                  500          556         1,458        1,566

   Net income (loss)                    $ 16        $ (94)        $ 50        $ (242)

   Net income (loss) allocated to
      general partner (0.2%)            $ --         $ --         $ --         $ --

   Net income (loss) allocated to
      limited partners (99.8%)             16          (94)           50         (242)

                                        $ 16        $ (94)        $ 50        $ (242)

   Net income (loss) per limited
      partnership unit                 $ 0.09      $ (0.51)      $ 0.28       $ (1.33)

   Distribution per limited
      partnership unit                  $ --         $ --         $ --        $ 2.83


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>





                         CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIT) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                    Limited                 Special
                                  Partnership    General    Limited   Limited
                                     Units       Partner   Partners   Partners     Total

<S>                                 <C>            <C>       <C>      <C>         <C>
Original capital contributions      181,808        $ 1       $ --     $45,452     $45,453

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at December 31, 2001             181,300       $ (2)      $ (81)    $ 379       $ 296

Amortization of timing
   difference                            --          --          5         (5)         --

Net income for the nine months
   ended September 30, 2002              --          --         --         50          50

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at September 30, 2002            181,300       $ (2)      $ (76)    $ 424       $ 346

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                   Nine Months Ended
                                                                     September 30,
                                                                   2002         2001
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                               <C>        <C>
  Net income (loss)                                               $ 50       $ (242)
  Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
   cash provided by operating activities:
   Depreciation                                                     337          325
   Amortization of loan costs                                         5            5
   Casualty gain                                                    (18)          --
  Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                       23           10
      Other assets                                                  (11)          (8)
      Accounts payable                                              (56)         165
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                            10          (17)
      Accrued property taxes                                        (25)         (53)
      Other liabilities                                              76           73
      Due to affiliates                                              26           --
         Net cash provided by operating activities                  417          258

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (261)        (266)
  Insurance proceeds received                                        19           --
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (242)        (266)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                (106)        (106)
  Advances from affiliates                                           98           --
  Payments on advances from affiliates                             (237)          --
  Distributions paid to partners                                     --         (534)
         Net cash used in financing activities                     (245)        (640)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                           (70)        (648)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    240          810
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                       $ 170        $ 162

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                         $ 314        $ 274

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying  unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements of Consolidated
Capital  Properties VI (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial  statements.  In the opinion of ConCap  Equities,  Inc.  ("CEI" or the
"General  Partner"),  all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating
results  for the  three  and nine  months  ended  September  30,  2002,  are not
necessarily  indicative  of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year
ending  December 31, 2002. For further  information,  refer to the  consolidated
financial  statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2001.  The General
Partner  is  an  affiliate  of  Apartment   Investment  and  Management  Company
("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.

Note B - Related Party Transactions

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership.

Affiliates of the General  Partner are entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts
from  the  Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$87,000  and  $70,000 for the nine  months  ended  September  30, 2002 and 2001,
respectively, which is included in operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of the General  Partner  received  reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately $89,000 and $173,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001,  respectively,  which is included
in investment property and general and administrative expenses.  Included in the
amount for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 are fees related to
construction management services provided by an affiliate of the General Partner
of approximately $17,000 and $95,000,  respectively. The construction management
service fees are  calculated  based on a percentage of current year additions to
the  investment  property.  As of  September  30,  2002,  the  Partnership  owed
approximately  $27,000 to an affiliate of the General Partner for  reimbursement
of accountable administrative expenses which is included in Due to affiliates on
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

The Partnership Agreement also provides for a special management fee equal to 9%
of the total  distributions  made from operations to the Limited  Partners to be
paid  to  the  General  Partner  for  executive  and  administrative  management
services.  No such  fee  was  earned  in  2002.  The  General  Partner  received
approximately  $46,000 in March 2001, resulting from a distribution declared and
paid during the nine months ended  September  30,  2001.  The fee is included in
general and administrative expenses.

The  Partnership  had  advances  from an  affiliate  of the  General  Partner of
approximately  $139,000 as of December  31,  2001.  During the nine months ended
September  30,  2002,  the  Partnership  received  additional  advances  from an
affiliate  of the  General  Partner of  approximately  $98,000.  During the nine
months  ended  September  30,  2002,   these  advances  were  repaid   including
approximately $5,000 in accrued interest. Interest was charged at the prime rate
plus 2% and amounted to approximately $4,000 for the nine months ended September
30, 2002.  There were no loans from the General  Partner or associated  interest
expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2001.

Beginning in 2001,  the  Partnership  began  insuring its property up to certain
limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally  self-insured for a
portion of losses and  liabilities  related  to workers  compensation,  property
casualty and vehicle liability.  The Partnership  insures its property above the
AIMCO  limits  through  insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers
unaffiliated  with the General  Partner.  During the nine months ended September
30,  2002 and 2001,  the  Partnership  was  charged by AIMCO and its  affiliates
approximately $17,000 and $19,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees
associated with policy claims administration.

Note C - Change in Status of Non-Corporate General Partner

During the year ended December 31, 1991, the  Partnership  Agreement was amended
to convert the  general  partner  interests  held by the  non-corporate  general
partner,  Consolidated  Capital  Group II  ("CCG"),  to that of special  limited
partners ("Special Limited Partners").  The Special Limited Partners do not have
a vote and do not have any of the other rights of a Limited  Partner  except the
right to inspect  the  Partnership's  books and  records;  however,  the Special
Limited Partners  retained the economic  interest in the Partnership  which they
previously owned as general partner.

ConCap Equities, Inc. ("CEI") became the sole general partner of the Partnership
effective  December 31, 1991. In  connection  with CCG's  conversion,  a special
allocation of gross income was made to the Special Limited  Partners in order to
eliminate its tax basis negative capital account.

After the conversion,  the various Special Limited Partners transferred portions
of their  interests to CEI so that CEI now holds a .2% interest in all allocable
items of income,  loss and  distribution.  The  differences  between the Special
Limited  Partners'  capital  accounts for financial  statement and tax reporting
purposes are being amortized to the Limited  Partners'  capital  accounts as the
components of the timing differences which created the balance reverse.

Note D - Casualty Gain

The casualty gain is related to a fire at the property in August 2001. A gain of
approximately $43,000 was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2001. An
additional gain of approximately  $18,000 was recognized  during the nine months
ended September 30, 2002 due to the receipt of additional  insurance proceeds of
approximately $19,000, net of the write off of additional undepreciated property
improvements and replacements of approximately $1,000.

<PAGE>

Note E - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative  unitholders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order granting in part the demurrer.  The Court has dismissed without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General Partner and affiliated  defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002,
the Court held a hearing on plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took
the matter under submission after further briefing, as ordered by the court, was
submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002, the Court entered an order vacating
the  current  trial  date of  January  13,  2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and
discovery cut-off dates) and stayed the case in its entirety through November 7,
2002 so that the  parties  can have an  opportunity  to discuss  settlement.  On
October  30,  2002,  the court  entered  an order  extending  the stay in effect
through January 10, 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike the  complaint.  On December  11, 2001,  the court heard  argument on the
motions and took the matters under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court
served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the Heller
complaint  as a violation  of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On
March 27, 2002, the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking the
complaint. The parties are currently in the midst of briefing that appeal.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any  costs,  whether  legal or
settlement  costs,   associated  with  these  cases  will  be  material  to  the
Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

<PAGE>

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The Private  Securities  Litigation  Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor"
for forward-looking  statements in certain circumstances.  The matters discussed
in this report contain certain forward-looking  statements,  including,  without
limitation,  statements regarding future financial performance and the effect of
government regulations. The discussions of the Registrant's business and results
of operations,  including forward-looking statements pertaining to such matters,
do not take into account the effects of any changes to the Registrant's business
and  results of  operations.  Actual  results may differ  materially  from those
described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of
risks and factors  including,  without  limitation:  national and local economic
conditions; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Registrant and
interpretations of those regulations;  the competitive  environment in which the
Registrant  operates;  financing risks,  including the risk that cash flows from
operations  may be  insufficient  to meet  required  payments of  principal  and
interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and the
general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition for tenants in such
markets; and possible environmental liabilities. Readers should carefully review
the Registrant's financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk
factors  described in the documents the Registrant  files from time to time with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment property consists of one apartment complex, Colony
of Springdale Apartments, located in Springdale, Ohio. The average occupancy for
the nine month  periods  ended  September  30,  2002 and 2001,  was 94% and 90%,
respectively.  The increase in occupancy at The Colony of Springdale  Apartments
is due to a more aggressive marketing campaign.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's  net income for the nine  months  ended  September  30,  2002
totaled approximately  $50,000 compared to a net loss of approximately  $242,000
for the  corresponding  period of 2001. The Partnership  realized net income for
the three months ended September 30, 2002 of approximately $16,000 compared to a
net loss of approximately $94,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001.
The  increase in net income for the three and nine months  ended  September  30,
2002 is due to an increase in total  revenues and a decrease in total  expenses.
The  increase  in total  revenues  for  both the  three  and nine  months  ended
September  30, 2002 is  attributable  to an increase in rental  income and, to a
lesser extent, an increase in other income. The increase in rental income is due
to an increase in occupancy and a decrease in concessions  offered to tenants at
Colony of Springdale  Apartments.  The increase in other income is primarily due
to an  increase  in utility  reimbursements,  partially  offset by a decrease in
interest income due to lower average cash balances in interest bearing accounts.

The increase in total  revenues for the nine months ended  September 30, 2002 is
also due to the  recognition of a casualty gain. The casualty gain is related to
a fire at the  property  in August  2001.  A gain of  approximately  $43,000 was
recognized  during the year ended  December  31,  2001.  An  additional  gain of
approximately  $18,000 was recognized during the nine months ended September 30,
2002 due to the  receipt  of  additional  insurance  proceeds  of  approximately
$19,000, net of the write off of additional  undepreciated property improvements
and replacements of approximately $1,000.

The decrease in total expenses for the three months ended  September 30, 2002 is
due to a decrease  in  operating  expenses  partially  offset by an  increase in
property tax expense.  The decrease in total  expenses for the nine months ended
September  30,  2002 is the result of a decrease  in  operating  and general and
administrative expenses partially offset by an increase in property tax expense.
Operating  expenses  decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2002 primarily due to a decrease in maintenance  expenses partially offset by an
increase in property  management  fees. The decrease in maintenance  expenses is
primarily due to a decrease in contract services at the investment property. The
increase in property  management fees is primarily due to the increase in rental
income at the investment property. The increase in property tax expense for both
the three and nine months ended  September  30, 2002 is due to the timing of the
receipt of the tax bills, which affected the recording of the associated accrual
at both September 30, 2002 and 2001.

The  decrease  in general  and  administrative  expenses  is due to the  special
management fee of 9% on  distributions  from  operations  earned during the nine
months ended  September  30, 2001. No such fee was earned during the nine months
ended September 30, 2002. General and administrative expenses also decreased due
to a decrease in the cost of services included in the management  reimbursements
to the General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement. Also included
in general and administrative  expenses at both September 30, 2002 and 2001, are
costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors and
regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner
monitors the rental market environment of its investment  property to assess the
feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and
protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the
General  Partner  attempts  to  protect  the  Partnership  from  the  burden  of
inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a
high overall occupancy level. However, due to changing market conditions,  which
can  result in the use of rental  concessions  and rental  reductions  to offset
softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the General Partner will
be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  September  30,  2002,  the  Partnership  had cash and  cash  equivalents  of
approximately $170,000 compared to approximately $162,000 at September 30, 2001.
Cash and cash equivalents  decreased by approximately $70,000 since December 31,
2001 due to  approximately  $245,000 and $242,000 of cash used in financing  and
investing activities,  respectively,  partially offset by approximately $417,000
of cash  provided by operating  activities.  Cash used in  financing  activities
consisted of payments on advances from affiliates and principal payments made on
the mortgage encumbering the Partnership's property partially offset by advances
from  affiliates.  Cash  used in  investing  activities  consisted  of  property
improvements and replacements  partially offset by insurance  proceeds received.
The  Partnership  invests its  working  capital  reserves  in  interest  bearing
accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal,  state,
and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  General  Partner  monitors
developments in the area of legal and regulatory  compliance and is studying new
federal laws,  including the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002  mandates  or suggests  additional  compliance  measures  with regard to
governance,  disclosure,  audit and other areas. In light of these changes,  the
Partnership  expects that it will incur higher  expenses  related to compliance,
including increased legal and audit fees. Capital  improvements  planned for the
Partnership's property are discussed below.

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $261,000 in budgeted and unbudgeted  capital  improvements at the
property.  Approximately $97,000 of these expenditures were repairs completed as
a result of a casualty  during 2001.  These  repairs were funded from  insurance
proceeds  received in 2001 and 2002.  The  improvements  consisted  primarily of
floor  covering  and  roof  replacements,  structural  improvements  and a water
submetering  project.  These  improvements were funded from operating cash flow.
Approximately  $250,000 has been budgeted for capital  improvements at Colony of
Springdale  for the year 2002  consisting  primarily  of floor  covering,  roof,
appliance,   heating  and  air  conditioning   unit   replacements,   structural
improvements,  and a water submetering project.  Additional  improvements may be
considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well as
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.  The capital  expenditures will
be incurred only if cash is available from  operations.  To the extent that such
budgeted capital improvements are completed, the Registrant's distributable cash
flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The Partnership's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs  (exclusive  of capital  improvements)  of the  Partnership.  The mortgage
indebtedness of approximately  $5,230,000 matures December 1, 2019 at which time
the mortgage is scheduled to be fully amortized.

The Partnership  distributed the following  amounts during the nine months ended
September 30, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands except per unit data):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                     Nine Months          Per          Nine Months          Per
                        Ended           Limited           Ended           Limited
                    September 30,     Partnership     September 30,     Partnership
                         2002             Unit             2001             Unit

<S>                      <C>              <C>             <C>              <C>
Operations               $ --             $ --            $ 534            $ 2.83
</TABLE>

Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net cash generated from
operations,  the  availability  of cash  reserves  and the  timing  of the  debt
maturity,  refinancing and/or property sale. The Registrant's cash available for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis.  There can be no assurance that the
Partnership  will generate  sufficient  funds from  operations,  after  required
capital  expenditures,  to  permit  distributions  to its  partners  during  the
remainder of 2002 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 91,707 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 50.58% of the outstanding Units at
September  30,  2002. A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender
offers  made by  AIMCO  or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its
affiliates will acquire additional units of limited partnership  interest in the
Partnership  in  exchange  for cash or a  combination  of cash and  units in the
operating  partnership  of AIMCO  either  through  private  purchases  or tender
offers. Under the Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders holding a majority of the
Units are  entitled to take action  with  respect to a variety of matters  which
would  include  voting on certain  amendments to the  Partnership  Agreement and
voting to remove the General Partner.  As a result of its ownership of 50.58% of
the outstanding  Units,  AIMCO is in a position to control all voting  decisions
with  respect to the  Registrant.  Although the General  Partner owes  fiduciary
duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes
fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole  stockholder.  As a result,  the duties of
the General  Partner,  as general  partner,  to the  Partnership and its limited
partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO,
as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.



<PAGE>


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The  investment  property is recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's   investment  property.  These  factors  include  changes  in  the
national,  regional and local economic  climate;  local  conditions,  such as an
oversupply  of  multifamily   properties;   competition   from  other  available
multifamily  property  owners and changes in market  rental  rates.  Any adverse
changes in these factors could cause an impairment in the Partnership's assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized monthly as it is earned. The
Partnership will offer rental concessions during  particularly slow months or in
response  to  heavy  competition  from  other  similar  complexes  in the  area.
Concessions are charged to income as incurred.

ITEM 3.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The principal  executive officer and principal  financial officer of the General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and  principal  financial  officer,  respectively,  have,  within 90 days of the
filing  date  of this  quarterly  report,  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the
Partnership's  disclosure  controls and  procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules  (13a-14(c)  and  (15d-14(c))  and have  determined  that such  disclosure
controls and procedures are adequate.  There have been no significant changes in
the Partnership's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect the  Partnership's  internal  controls since the date of evaluation.  The
Partnership does not believe any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses
exist in the Partnership's internal controls. Accordingly, no corrective actions
have been taken.

<PAGE>

                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative  unitholders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order granting in part the demurrer.  The Court has dismissed without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General Partner and affiliated  defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002,
the Court held a hearing on plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took
the matter under submission after further briefing, as ordered by the court, was
submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002, the Court entered an order vacating
the  current  trial  date of  January  13,  2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and
discovery cut-off dates) and stayed the case in its entirety through November 7,
2002 so that the  parties  can have an  opportunity  to discuss  settlement.  On
October  30,  2002,  the court  entered  an order  extending  the stay in effect
through January 10, 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike the  complaint.  On December  11, 2001,  the court heard  argument on the
motions and took the matters under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court
served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the Heller
complaint  as a violation  of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On
March 27, 2002, the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking the
complaint. The parties are currently in the midst of briefing that appeal.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any  costs,  whether  legal or
settlement  costs,   associated  with  these  cases  will  be  material  to  the
Partnership's overall operations.



<PAGE>



ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a) Exhibits:

                  3.1   Certificate  of  Limited  Partnership,  incorporated  by
                        reference to the  Registration  Statement of  Registrant
                        filed October 22, 1984, as amended to date.

                  3.2   Agreement  of  Limited   Partnership,   incorporated  by
                        reference to the  Registration  Statement of  Registrant
                        filed October 22, 1984, as amended to date.

                  99    Certification of Chief Executive   Officer   and  Chief
                        Financial Officer.

            b) Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended September 30, 2002.




<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI


                                    By:   CONCAP EQUITIES, INC.
                                          General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Accounting Officer


                                    Date: January 9, 2003


<PAGE>



                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Patrick J. Foye, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated  Capital
Properties VI;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;


      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


      a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 13, 2002




                               /s/Patrick J. Foye
                               Patrick J. Foye
                               Executive  Vice  President  of ConCap  Equities,
                               Inc.,  equivalent of the chief executive officer
                               of the Partnership


<PAGE>



                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Paul J. McAuliffe, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated  Capital
Properties VI;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;


      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


      a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 13, 2002

                               /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                               Paul J. McAuliffe
                               Executive  Vice  President  and Chief  Financial
                               Officer of ConCap Equities,  Inc., equivalent of
                               the chief financial officer of the Partnership



<PAGE>


Exhibit 99


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                   Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated  Capital
Properties VI (the "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  Patrick  J. Foye,  as the  equivalent  of the chief  executive
officer of the  Partnership,  and Paul J.  McAuliffe,  as the  equivalent of the
chief financial officer of the Partnership,  each hereby certifies,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Name:  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Date:  November 13, 2002


                                           /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Name:  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Date:  November 13, 2002



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.