alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-3091WM

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * James Allen Taylor, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: February 9, 1999

Filed: February 18, 1999

_____________ Before FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and ROSENBAUM, * District Judge.

_____________ PER CURIAM. James Allen Taylor appeals his conviction and sentence for interstate transportation of stolen securities. Taylor contends the evidence is insufficient to supportthe jury's verdict. Taylor also raises an argument about his sentence. We rejec t Taylor's contentions and conclude that an extended discussion of the issues presentedby this appeal will serve no useful purpose. First, the record contains substantial evidence on which the jury reasonably could have found Taylor guilty of-2-

the charge. Second, the district court correctly determined Taylor's guidelines sentence. We thus affirm Taylor's conviction and sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### In the Matter of Jennifer Amorosi, Appellant, v South Colonie Independent Central School District et al., Respondents.

Submitted October 9, 2007;

decided October 11, 2007

Reported below, 34 AD3d 1073.

Motion by New York State United Teachers for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted. Three copies of the brief must be served and an original and 24 copies filed within seven days.
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.3



RENASANT CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
AMENDMENT NO. 1


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into by and between C. Mitchell Waycaster (“Executive”) and Renasant Corporation, a Mississippi corporation (the “Company”), and is intended to amend that certain Executive Employment Agreement by and between Executive and the Company, first effective as of January 1, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”).  


1.    Effectiveness and Construction.  This Amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 2018; in all other respects, the terms of the Employment Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect.  


2.    Executive’s Separation from Service In Connection With a Change in Control.  Section 5.2(c) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:


		
	“c.
	A cash payment equal to 2.99 times the aggregate of Executive’s (i) Base Compensation in effect prior to the Change in Control, determined without regard to any reduction thereof giving rise to a Constructive Termination, and (ii) average bonus paid under the PBRP with respect to the Company’s two whole fiscal years preceding such Change in Control; such aggregate amount to be paid in the form of a single-sum not more than 60 days following Executive’s Separation Date.”




3.    Section 409A.  The following subsection (g) shall be added to Section 7.16 of the Employment Agreement to read in its entirety as follows:


		
	“(g)
	Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, any amount that could be paid in one of two calendar years hereunder shall be paid in the second such year.” 




THIS AMENDMENT was approved by the Board of Directors of the Company on December 20, 2017, to be effective as provided herein.


RENASANT CORPORATION:             C. MITCHELL WAYCASTER: 


By: /s/ E. Robinson McGraw                By:  /s/ C. Mitchell Waycaster                                                                 
Date: February 14, 2018                    Date: February 14, 2018
215.404-71 Weighted guidelines method.

215.404-71-1 General

215.404-71-2 Performance risk.

215.404-71-3 Contract type risk and working capital adjustment.

215.404-71-4 Facilities capital employed.

215.404-71-5 Cost efficiency factor.

Parent topic: 215.404 Proposal analysis.
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 1 of 1
# L_2015062EN.01003501.xml

| 6.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 62/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 62/35

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision 2014/738/EU of 9 October 2014 establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions, for the refining of mineral oil and gas

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 307 of 28 October 2014
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 307 of 28 October 2014

In sections 1.20.6, 1.20.7, 1.21.1 and 1.21.2 of the Annex, the following title row is added to the respective tables:

| ‘Technique | Description’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Technique

Description’

---
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 1 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 2 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 3 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 4 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 5 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 6 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 7 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 8 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 9 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 10 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 11 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 12 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 13 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 14 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 15 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 16 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 17 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 18 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 19 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 20 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 21 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 22 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 23 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 24 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 25 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 26 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 27 of 28
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 28 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 2 of 2
FIRST AMENDMENT

                             TO

     SALE AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS


      THIS AMENDMENT made and entered into this 8th day   of
July,  1999,  by  and between AEI Fund Management,  Inc.,  a
Minnesota corporation, ("Purchaser") and Marie Callender Pie
Shops, Inc., ("Seller");

     WITNESSETH, that:

      WHEREAS,  on  the  2nd day of June, 1999  the  parties
hereto  executed  a Sale and Purchase Agreement  and  Escrow
Instructions  (Agreement  ") for  those  certain  properties
located as follows:

1.   Gresham #247             Farris Road, Gresham, OR

2.    Henderson #245           Warm Springs Road, Henderson, NV

3.    Amarillo #261            4111 Wolfin Avenue, Amarillo, TX

(collectively "the Properties"); and

      WHEREAS, AEI and Borrower have agreed to amend certain
terms  and  conditions  of  said  Agreement  as  hereinafter
provided;

      NOW, THEREFORE, for One Dollar ($1.00) and other  good
and  valuable  consideration, receipt  of  which  is  hereby
acknowledged,  it is hereby agreed between  the  parties  as
follows:

1.    The  ten (10) business days referred to in  the  first
line  of   Paragraph 5.4 beginning is deleted  and  replaced
with twenty (20) business days.

2.    The thirty (30) business days referred to in the third
line  of  Paragraph 5.1 is deleted and replaced with  forty-
five (45) business days.


      EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH ABOVE all other terms
and   conditions  of  said  Lease  Documents  shall   remain
unchanged and in full force and effect.


                         AEI FUND MANAGEMENT, INC.


                         By:/s/ Mark E Larson
                                Mark E. Larson
                                Its: Chief Financial Officer




                         MARIE CALLENDER PIE SHOPS, INC.

                         By: /s/ Stephen Jennings

                              Its: Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# DATE AND TIME:

Friday, March 11, 2011; 9:30 a.m. EST.

# PLACE:

624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

## Briefing Agenda

This briefing is open to the public.

*Topic:*                     The Civil Rights Implications of Eminent Domain Abuse.                

I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman.

II. Speakers' Presentations.

III. Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director.

IV. Adjourn Briefing.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: 

Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

Dated: December 3, 2010.

David Blackwood,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2010-30935 Filed 12-6-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ERIC EUGENE FULLER,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5:21-cv-24-TKW/MAF

MARK INCH, Secretary, Florida 

Department of Corrections,

Respondent.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 3). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be transferred to the 

Jacksonville Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of 

Florida. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is TRANSFERRED to the Jacksonville Division of the 

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

3. The Clerk shall close the case file in this Court.

Case 5:21-cv-00024-TKW-MAF Document 4 Filed 02/22/21 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of February, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:21-cv-00024-TKW-MAF Document 4 Filed 02/22/21 Page 2 of 2
**CERTIFICATIONS

**Exhibit 31.1  **Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **CERTIFICATIONS
I, George W. Hamlin, IV, certify that: 
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Canandaigua National Corporation; 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosures controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  
(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  
(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

 

August 9, 2004 
/s/ George W. Hamlin, IV
Date 
George W. Hamlin, IV, President and  
Chief Executive Officer

 ********
§ 701.111 Prohibition on duplicate payments. ( a ) *Duplicate payments.* Participants are not eligible to receive funding under ECP on the same piece of land for which the participant has or will receive funding under any other Federal program that covers the same or similar expenses so as to create duplicate payments, or, in effect, a higher rate of cost share than is allowed under this part. ( 1 ) The Wetland Reserve Program (WRP) provided for in 7 CFR part 1467;
( 2 ) The Emergency Wetland Reserve Program (EWRP) provided for in 7 CFR part 623;
( 3 ) The Emergency Watershed Protection Program (EWP), provided for in 7 CFR part 624, for the same or similar expenses; or
( 4 ) Any other Federal program that covers the same or similar expenses so as to create duplicate payments, or, in effect, a higher rate of cost share than is allowed under this part.
( b ) *Refund.* Participants who receive any duplicate funds, payments, or benefits shall refund any ECP payments received.
[69 FR 10302, Mar. 4, 2004, as amended at 71 FR 30265, May 26, 2006. Redesignated at 75 FR 70088, Nov. 17, 2010, as amended at 88 FR 1883, Jan. 11, 2023; 88 FR 39768, June 20, 2023]
Case 3:20-cr-00080-MCR Document 24 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00080-MCR Document 24 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00080-MCR Document 24 Filed 12/14/20 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00080-MCR Document 24 Filed 12/14/20 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00080-MCR Document 24 Filed 12/14/20 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00080-MCR Document 24 Filed 12/14/20 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00080-MCR Document 24 Filed 12/14/20 Page 7 of 7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WAYNE BLACK, #137192 )

)

Plaintiff, ) 

v. ) CASE NO. 1:03-cv-734-MEF

) WO

LAMAR GLOVER, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

It is ORDERED that this case is set for a pretrial hearing, as provided by Fed.R.Civ.P. 16,

on September 5, 2006 at 3:30 P.M. in Courtroom 2A, United States Courthouse, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama. The persons having custody of the plaintiff are directed to produce him

at the September 5, 2006 pretrial in Montgomery, Alabama, and the October 2, 2006 jury trial

in Dothan, Alabama.

The pretrial hearing will be conducted in consideration of the matters provided for in Rule

16. All parties are expected to have fully complied with this court's Rule 16 order. All parties

should prepare and have ready all possible admissions of fact and documents which might avoid

unnecessary proof upon trial.

ANY PRO SE LITIGANTS AND ALL LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL FOR ALL

REPRESENTED PARTIES MUST BE PRESENT at the time above designated and be fully

prepared to state the facts of the case in the most minute detail and to admit all facts that are true.

Appropriate penalties will be imposed for failure to comply with these requirements.

All motions WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN OTHERWISE SUBMITTED OR RULED ON will

be heard at the above stated time.

The defendants are DIRECTED to prepare a proposed pretrial order in accordance with the

attached outline without the plaintiff's contentions. Counsel for defendants are DIRECTED to e:mail

the proposed pretrial order to propord_fuller@almd.uscourts.gov in Word or WordPerfect format,

to be received no later than three business days prior to the pretrial hearing. The defendants

shall be prepared to discuss stipulations with the plaintiff at the pretrial conference.

TRIAL TERM COMMENCES: October 2, 2006, in Dothan, Alabama.

DONE this the 11th day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 20 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS

The proposed pretrial order must be joint, and not piecemeal, and it should be reviewed and

approved by all parties BEFORE the pretrial hearing.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

DIVISION

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 

)

)

Defendant. )

ORDER ON PRETRIAL HEARING

A pretrial hearing was held in this case on ______, wherein the following proceedings

were held and actions taken:

1. PARTIES AND TRIAL COUNSEL:

COUNSEL APPEARING AT PRETRIAL HEARING: (same as trial counsel)

or (indicate if different) ____________________

2. JURISDICTION AND VENUE:

3. PLEADINGS: The following pleadings and amendments were allowed:

Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 20 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 3
3

4. CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES:

(a) The plaintiff(s)

(b) The defendant(s)

5. STIPULATIONS BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES:

PLEASE LEAVE ORDER UNFINISHED AT THIS POINT FOR COMPLETION BY

THE COURT.

Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 20 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 3
52.222-21 Prohibition of Segregated

Facilities.

As prescribed in 22.810(a)(1), insert the following clause:

Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (Apr 2015)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause

Gender identity has the meaning given by the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract

Compliance Programs, and is found at http://www.dol.gov/ofccp/LGBT/LGBT_FAQs.html.

Segregated facilities, means any waiting rooms, work areas, rest rooms and wash rooms, restaurants

and other eating areas, time clocks, locker rooms and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots,

drinking fountains, recreation or entertainment areas, transportation, and housing facilities provided

for employees, that are segregated by explicit directive or are in fact segregated on the basis of

race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin because of written or

oral policies or employee custom. The term does not include separate or single-user rest rooms or

necessary dressing or sleeping areas provided to assure privacy between the sexes.

Sexual orientation has the meaning given by the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract

Compliance Programs, and is found at http://www.dol.gov/ofccp/LGBT/LGBT_FAQs.html.

(b) The Contractor agrees that it does not and will not maintain or provide for its employees any

segregated facilities at any of its establishments, and that it does not and will not permit its

employees to perform their services at any location under its control where segregated facilities are

maintained. The Contractor agrees that a breach of this clause is a violation of the Equal

Opportunity clause in this contract.

(c) The Contractor shall include this clause in every subcontract and purchase order that is subject

to the Equal Opportunity clause of this contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
|   | (1) | The      Report, containing the financial statements, fully complies with the      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      MMPI. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                         |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                      |   |                         |   |
| Date:      March 13, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Andrew      Murray  |   |
|                      |   | Andrew      Murray           |   |
|                      |   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |
|                      |   |                         |   |
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-13 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-13 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-13 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 3