alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Revised Schedule to Change in Control Agreement



 Exhibit 10.13(a) 
 Revised Schedule to Change in Control Agreement 
 Horace Mann Educators Corporation
(“HMEC”) and Horace Mann Service Corporation (“HMSC”) entered into Change in Control Agreements with the following persons on the dates shown. These agreements are substantially similar to the one included as Exhibit 10.13 to
HMEC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, except that the multiple of the annual base salary and average of annual cash bonus paid to the employee in the last three years is equal to the duration listed below.

  

					
	 Employee
	 	 Duration
	 	 Agreement Date

			
	 Stephen P. Cardinal
	 	 2 years
	 	 December 2008

	 Richard R. Schulenburg
	 	 2 years
	 	 December 2008

	 Thomas C. Wilkinson
	 	 2 years
	 	 September 2008

	 Brent H. Hamann
	 	 2 years
	 	 March 2009
#### § 51.1451 Foreign material.

*Foreign material* includes rocks, wood, glass, plastic, or any similar material. It does not include hard shell, center wall, or pecan weevil larvae.
#### FORDHAM, Appellant v. MAESTRO CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 23, 1906.)

Action by Albert C. Fordham against the Maestro Company.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 764.452 Borrower training requirements. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 65041 , Aug. 8, 2024.
( a ) The applicant must agree to complete production and financial management training, unless the Agency provides a waiver in accordance with § 764.453, or the applicant has previously satisfied the training requirements. In the case of an entity: ( 1 ) Any individual member holding a majority interest in the entity or who is operating the farm must complete training on behalf of the entity, except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section;
( 2 ) If one entity member is solely responsible for production or financial management, then only that member will be required to complete training.
( b ) When the Agency determines that production training is required, the applicant must agree to complete course work covering production management in each crop or livestock enterprise the Agency determines necessary.
( c ) When the Agency determines that financial management training is required, the applicant must agree to complete course work covering all aspects of farm accounting and integrating accounting elements into a financial management system.
( d ) An applicant who applies for a loan to finance a new enterprise, such as a new crop or a new type of livestock, must agree to complete production training with regard to that enterprise, even if production training requirements were waived or satisfied under a previous loan request, unless the Agency provides a waiver in accordance with § 764.453.
( e ) Even if a waiver is granted, the borrower must complete borrower training as a condition for future loans if and when Agency supervision provided in 7 CFR part 761 subpart C reflects that such training is needed.
( f ) The Agency cannot reject a request for a direct loan based solely on an applicant's need for training.
( g ) The Agency will provide written notification of required training or waiver of training.
<TABLE> <S> <C>






<ARTICLE>5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                         10,291
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                 105,729
<ALLOWANCES>                   47,777
<INVENTORY>                    12,753
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              146,761
<PP&E>                        414,027
<DEPRECIATION>                123,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                750,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         119,133
<BONDS>                       521,916
<COMMON>                      224,542
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                   (176,336)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  750,413
<SALES>                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              311,558
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              257,810
<LOSS-PROVISION>               18,431
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             25,674
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 9,643
<INCOME-TAX>                   (2,320)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             7,323
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                (1,175)
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                    6,148
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0.11
        



</TABLE>
# L_2014010EN.01000101.xml

| 15.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 10/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 10/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 27/2014

of 19 December 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Anglesey Sea Salt/Halen Môn (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Anglesey Sea Salt/Halen Môn’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Anglesey Sea Salt/Halen Môn’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 232, 10.8.2013, p. 17.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.8   other products of Annex I to the Treaty (spices, etc.)

UNITED KINGDOM

Anglesey Sea Salt/Halen Môn (PDO)

---
23.302 Policy.

(a) The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is responsible for issuing and

administering regulations that require Government activities to apprise their employees of-

(1) All hazards to which they may be exposed;

(2) Relative symptoms and appropriate emergency treatment; and

(3) Proper conditions and precautions for safe use and exposure.

(b) To accomplish this objective, it is necessary to obtain certain information relative to the hazards

which may be introduced into the workplace by the supplies being acquired. Accordingly, offerors

and contractors are required to submit hazardous materials data whenever the supplies being

acquired are identified as hazardous materials. The latest version of Federal Standard No.313

(Material Safety Data Sheet, Preparation and Submission of) includes criteria for identification of

hazardous materials.

(c) Hazardous material data (Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)) are required-

(1) As specified in the latest version of Federal Standard No.313 (including revisions adopted during

the term of the contract);

(2) For any other material designated by a Government technical representative as potentially

hazardous and requiring safety controls.

(d) MSDS’s must be submitted-

(1) By the apparent successful offeror prior to contract award if hazardous materials are expected to

be used during contract performance.

(2) For agencies other than the Department of Defense, again by the contractor with the supplies at

the time of delivery.

(e) The contracting officer shall provide a copy of all MSDS’s received to the safety officer or other

designated individual.

Parent topic: Subpart 23.3 - Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 10, 2017.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-1702

Lower Tribunal Nos. 99-1895B, 99-1876B, 99-2549A,

99-3075B, 99-3780B, 99-10155B, 99-10156B

________________

Marco Hernandez,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch, Judge.

Daniel Tibbitt, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Arlisa Certain, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse in part and affirm in part the order denying the defendant’s post-
conviction relief motion. As the State commendably concedes in its response, we

reverse and remand with a direction that the court is to resentence the defendant in

case numbers F99-2549A and F99-3075B by removing the habitual violent felony

offender designation, and by correctly designating the defendant as a habitual

felony offender in those cases. Gonzalez v. State, 208 So. 3d 143, 147 (Fla. 3d

DCA 2016) (“Because the record does not conclusively establish that Gonzalez's

double jeopardy claim has been previously decided on the merits, Gonzalez's

argument has merit.”). The defendant need not be present. Holmes v. State, 100

So. 3d 281, 283 n.5 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).

We affirm the order in all other respects, and reject the defendant’s claim

that his sentence in F99-10156B should run concurrently, rather than

consecutively, with the sentence in F99-10155B. The court properly made these

sentences consecutive, to satisfy the original, total term of 30 years, as detailed in

the 1999 plea agreement and sentence. 

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

2
§ 760.1707 Information to be furnished. ( a ) The affected farmer must furnish to the FSA county committee complete and accurate information sufficient to enable the FSA county committee or the Deputy Administrator to make the determinations required in this subpart. Such information must include, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) A copy of the notice from, or other evidence of action by, the public agency which resulted in the dumping or removal of the affected farmer's milk from the commercial market.
( 2 ) The specific weather or disaster event and its results on milk marketing for the claim period.
( 3 ) The quantity and butterfat test of milk produced and marketed during the base period. This information must be a certified statement from the affected farmer's milk marketing organization or any other evidence the FSA county committee accepts as an accurate record of milk production and butterfat tests during the base period.
( 4 ) The average number of dry cows, bred heifers, and cows milked during the base period and during each pay period in the application.
( 5 ) The affected farmer will provide two milk marketing statements, one for the base period and one for the claim period.
( 6 ) On the milk marketing statement the per hundredweight hauling rate and the per hundredweight $0.15 promotion fee, which are normally incurred by affected farmers who market through the milk marketing organization, that the affected farmer did not incur because of the dumping or removal of the milk from the commercial market, then the average price stated by the milk marketing organization will be the average gross price paid less these costs. If the milk marketing organization does not have this information, the affected farmer will furnish a statement specifying these costs, if any.
( 7 ) The amount of proceeds, if any, received by the affected farmer from the marketing of milk produced during the application period.
( 8 ) The amount of any payments not subject to refund made to the affected farmer by the milk marketing organization with respect to the milk produced during the application period and removed from the commercial market.
( 9 ) A detailed written statement from the affected farmer regarding the circumstances of the milk removal or dumping, the type and geographic scope of the weather event, what transportation limitations occurred in addition to how and where the removed or dumped milk was discarded.
( b ) If requested by FSA, the affected farmer must provide additional documentation that establishes the affected farmer's eligibility for a Milk Loss Program payment.
[88 FR 62290, Sept. 11, 2023]
Exhibit 34.1
                                                                    ------------



             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Management Committee
BMW Financial Services NA, LLC

We have examined BMW Financial Services NA, LLC's (the Company) compliance with
the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for Asset Backed Notes, BMW Vehicle Owner Trust
2006-A (except for the servicing criteria described in the following paragraph),
which the Company has determined as being applicable to the activities it
performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions being serviced
as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from September 1, 2006 (the date of
issuance of the BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2006-A) to December 31, 2006. Management
is responsible for BMW Financial Services NA, LLC's compliance with those
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on BMW Financial
Services NA, LLC's compliance based on our examination.

The Company has determined that the servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii),
1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(iii),
1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x) (A)-(C), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii),
1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities it
performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions being serviced
as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from September 1, 2006 (the date of
issuance of the BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2006-A) to December 31, 2006.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified in the first paragraph of this report and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, BMW Financial Services NA, LLC complied, in all material
respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of December 31, 2006 and
for the period from September 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.

/s/ J.H. Cohn LLP
Roseland, New Jersey
March 24, 2007
§ 60.123 Raised. *Raised* means in the case of: ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) Farm-raised fish and shellfish as it relates to the production steps defined in § 60.122: The period of time from hatched to harvested.
#### W. A. Olson Enterprises, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v Agway, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, aflirmed, with costs to plaintiff, in accordance with the following memorandum: The lease agreement between the parties provided that the prevailing party in any suit involving the mutual obligations under the lease shall be entitled, in any judgment recovered, to reasonable attorneys’ fees to be fixed by the court. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application for such fees is granted, the amount thereof to be determined at Special Term. (Appeals from order of Erie Supreme Court—rent.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
#### § 6.44 Delegation of authority.

The powers vested in the Administrator, FAS, insofar as such powers relate to the functions of the Investigating Authority by this regulation are hereby delegated to the Investigating Authority. This final rule has been reviewed under the USDA criteria established to implement Executive Order 12044, “Improving Government Regulations.” a determination has been made that this action should not be classified “significant” under those criteria. A Final Impact Statement has been prepared and is available from Carol M. Harvey in room 6622, South Agriculture Building, 14th and Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250.
GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

AIR PROGRAM 

MEMO 

DATE: September 7,2006 

TO: GRIC Legislative Standing Committee 

% A- 3 

FROM: Janet Travis, GRTC DEQ Air Quality Specialist 

.-I 

RE: Pre-Adoption Notice of Proposed TIP Ordinances 

In 2003 the Comlnunity implemented requirements and procedures for pre-adoption 

notice of proposed ordinances in order to allow Community members the opportunity to 

corninent prior to approval. The GRIC TIP is made up of 13 ordinances. One of the preadoption requirements is to post the first page of each ordinance in all of the GRTC 

districts. A notice of the date and time of the Legislative Standing Committee meeting at 

which the ordinances will be considered must also be posted in the disbicts. All of these 

documents are also required to be printed in the Gila River Indian News. Since there will 

be 14 pages of material to post, it will not be possible for the GRIN to all of the 

required pages. In fact, we have been informed by GRIN staff that due to limited 

resources it is not possible to allow more than a quarter page for the printing of a public 

notice. This was the case recently when the GRIN printed a notice for a DEQ public 

hearing. 

The air prograin requests permission to waive the publication requirements and instead, 

draft a general statement on the ordinances and the date and time of the scheduled 

Legislative meeting. The posting of the ordinances in the districts will remain within the 

established requirements. 

In order to give GRTC members and other stakeholders the opportunity to comment on all 

TIP ordinances, a public hearing was conducted in July at the Shelde building. 

If you have any questions, please contact me at 562-2234 ext. 286. 

Thank you.
#### § 56.7 Nondiscrimination.

The conduct of all services and the licensing of graders under these regulations shall be accomplished without discrimination as to race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status.

[71 FR 42008, July 24, 2006]
52.247-11 Net Weight-Household Goods or

Office Furniture.

As prescribed in 47.207-4(b), insert the following clause in contracts for transportation or for

transportation-related services when movements of Government employees’ household goods or

relocations of Government offices are involved:

Net Weight-Household Goods or Office Furniture (Apr 1984)

(a) Net weight-full loads. The net weight of the shipment shall be determined by deducting the tare

weight of the vehicle (determined by having a certified weighmaster weigh on a certified scale the

empty vehicle with all blankets, pads, chains, dollies, hand trucks, and all other necessary equipment

inside the vehicle) from the gross weight of the vehicle (determined by having a certified

weighmaster weigh on a certified scale the fully loaded vehicle before arrival at destination).

(b) Net weight-part loads. The net weight of the first part load shall be determined in the same

manner as specified for a full load. The net weight of the second part load shall be determined by

using as the tare weight of the vehicle the gross weight of the vehicle containing the first part load

and deducting this weight from the new gross weight (determined by having the loaded vehicle

weighed again, in the same manner as specified for the full load). The same procedure shall apply

for each succeeding part load.

(c) Weight certificates. The contractor shall attach the original copy of each weight certificate to the

invoice for services.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Lester S., Appellant.

Order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 7, 1968, affirmed, without costs. We are of the opinion that the determination of the Family Court was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. (Cf. *Matter of Samuel W.,*24 N Y 2d 196.) Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Part 238 - RESERVED

Parent topic: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
6.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes policies and procedures to promote full and open competition in the acquisition

process and to provide for full and open competition, full and open competition after exclusion of

sources, other than full and open competition, and advocates for competition. This part does not deal

with the results of competition (e.g., adequate price competition), that are addressed in other parts

(e.g., part 15).

Parent topic: Part 6 - Competition Requirements
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA DE JESUS CORTEZ CANALES, 

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 10-72783

Agency No. A094-374-872

ORDER*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted May 7, 2013

Submission Withdrawn June 23, 2015

Resubmitted January 6, 2017

Pasadena, California

Before: PREGERSON and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and GWIN,** District Judge.

This case is ordered resubmitted January 6, 2017.

The parties’ joint motion for voluntary dismissal (Dkt. 55), filed December 19,

2016, is GRANTED. The petition is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its

FILED

JAN 10 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

*This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as

provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**The Honorable James S. Gwin, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
own fees and costs. This order constitutes the mandate of this court, and the mandate

shall issue forthwith.

2
§ 718.204 Reconstitution of base acres. ( a ) Farms will be reconstituted in accordance with this subpart when it is determined that the land areas are not properly constituted and, to the extent practicable as determined by county committee, the reconstitution will be based on the facts and conditions existing at the time the change requiring the reconstitution occurred.
( b ) Reconstitutions will be effective for the calendar year if initiated by August 1 of that year. Any reconstitution initiated after August 1 will not be effective for that year; it will be effective for the subsequent year.
( c ) The Deputy Administrator may approve an exception to permit a reconstitution initiated after August 1 to be effective for the same year, if FSA determines that the failure is due to administrative problems as determined by FSA at the local or national level. Producers have no right to seek an exception under this paragraph. When such situations exist, FSA will establish procedures under which reconstitutions will be accepted and when those reconstitutions will become effective.
[79 FR 57714, Sept. 26, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 45887, Sept. 3, 2019]