alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2021410DE.01020101.xml

| 18.11.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 410/201 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 410/201

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2021/451 der Kommission vom 17. Dezember 2020 zur Festlegung technischer Durchführungsstandards für die Anwendung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 575/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates auf die aufsichtlichen Meldungen der Institute und zur Aufhebung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 680/2014

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 97 vom 19. März 2021
  )

Seite 9, Artikel 11 Absatz 2 letzter Unterabsatz:

Anstatt:

„Für die Zwecke der Buchstaben d bis h gelten die in Artikel 4 Absatz 3 genannten Ein- und Austrittskriterien nicht.“

muss es heißen:

„Für die Zwecke der Buchstaben d bis h gelten die in Artikel 4 Absatz 3 genannten Ein- und Austrittskriterien.“

Seite 10, Artikel 12 Absatz 2 letzter Unterabsatz:

Anstatt:

„Für die Zwecke der Buchstaben d bis h gelten die in Artikel 4 Absatz 3 genannten Ein- und Austrittskriterien nicht.“

muss es heißen:

„Für die Zwecke der Buchstaben d bis h gelten die in Artikel 4 Absatz 3 genannten Ein- und Austrittskriterien.“

Seite 11, Artikel 15 Absatz 5 Unterabsatz 2 Satz 1:

Anstatt:

„Die Ein- und Austrittskriterien von Artikel 4 Absatz 3 gelten für die Zwecke des vorliegenden Absatzes nicht.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Eintrittskriterien von Artikel 4 Absatz 3 gelten für die Zwecke des vorliegenden Absatzes nicht.“

---
#### § 51.1261 U.S. No. 1.

“U.S. No. 1” consists of pears of one variety which are mature, but not over-ripe, carefully hand-picked, clean, fairly well formed, free from decay, internal breakdown, scald, freezing injury, worm holes, black end, and from damage caused by hard end, bruises, broken skins, russeting, limb- rubs, hail, scars, drought spot, sunburn, sprayburn, stings or other insect injury, disease, or mechanical or other means. (See §§ 51.1265 and 51.1268.)
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ ESTECH SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

HOWARD MIDSTREAM ENERGY PARTNERS, dba Howard Energy Partners, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2023

- 1199

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in No. 6:20

- cv

- 00777

- ADA

, Judge Alan D. Albright.

______________________
O R D E R
The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that: (1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b ). Case: 23-1199 Document: 19 Page: 1 Filed: 07/07/2023E STECH S YSTEMS
, I NC

. V

. H OWARD M IDSTREAM E NERGY P ARTNERS 2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

July 7, 2023 Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow Jarrett B. Perlow Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 7, 2023 Case: 23-1199 Document: 19 Page: 2 Filed: 07/07/2023
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

MICHELLE BARNARD

v.

THE TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE

INSURANCE COMPANY

PETITION OF: UNITED STATES COURT

OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 141 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of December, 2018

, the Petition for Certification of

Question of Law is GRANTED. This Court shall consider the following issue:

If an insured under a policy of insurance subject to the Pennsylvania Motor
Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law has waived stacking but later secures an increase in the limit of her UIM coverage on her existing policy, must her

insurance carrier obtain a separate waiver of her right to stack the coverage or does a prior waiver of the right to stack the coverage remain in effect?

Michelle Barnard is DESIGNATED as Appellant, and Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company is DESIGNATED as Appellee.

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to establish a briefing schedule and list this case for oral argument.
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER      COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)**

**First      Horizon Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2006-3**

|         |                                                                          |                                               |
|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|         | First                Horizon Home Loan Corporation                            |
|    |                                                                     |                                          |
|              | By:                                                                 |  /s/                Kim                Yowell |
|         | Date:                03/01/07                                                 |
|         | Name:                Kim YowellTitle:                  SVP, Servicing Manager |

|         |                                                                      |                                                                     |
|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|         | First                Tennessee Mortgage Services, Inc.                    |
|    |                                                                 |                                                                |
|              | By:                                                             | /s/                Terry                L. McCoy     |
|         | Date:                03/01/07                                             |
|         | Name:                Terry L. McCoyTitle:                  Vice President |

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 57

#### Editorial Note:

1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

#### § 57.340 Who shall perform the appeal.

The assignment of the inspector(s) who will make the appeal inspection under § 57.310 shall be made by the Regional Director or the Chief of the Grading Branch.

[63 FR 69968, 69971, Dec. 17, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 57167, Sept. 24, 2004]
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 12
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 12
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 12
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 12
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 12
#### § 510.1 General statement.

This part is issued in accordance with the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture in part 1, subpart A of this title and appendix A thereto, implementing the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552). The Secretary's regulations, as implemented by the regulations in this part, govern the availability of records of the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) to the public.
Exhibit 32.1**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, **(i)**the Form 10-KSB filed by TSB FinancialCorporation (the “Issuer”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and **(ii)**theinformation contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presentedtherein.       **TSB Financial Corporation**     Date: March 23, 2007 By: /s/ John B. Stedman, Jr.         John B. Stedman, Jr.    President and Chief Executive Officer     Date: March 23, 2007 By: /s/ Jan H. Hollar         Jan H. Hollar    Executive Vice President    Secretary and    Chief Financial Officer
58
#### § 58.216 Hotwells.

The hotwells shall be enclosed or covered and should be equipped with indicating thermometers either in the hotwell or in the hot milk inlet line to the hotwell. If used for holding high heat products, they should also have recorders.
#### § 58.340 Printing and packaging.

Printing and packaging of consumer size containers of butter shall be conducted under sanitary conditions. Separate rooms equipped with automatic filling and packaging equipment should be provided. The outside cartons should be removed from bulk butter in a room outside of the printing operation but the parchment removal and cutting of the butter may be done in the print room.
52.228-2 Additional Bond Security.       As prescribed in 28.106-4(a), insert the following clause:          Additional Bond Security (Oct 1997)          The Contractor shall promptly furnish additional security required to protect the Government and persons supplying labor or materials under this contract if-                                       (a) 						            Any surety upon any bond, or issuing financial institution for other security, furnished with this contract becomes unacceptable to the Government;                                          (b) 						            Any surety fails to furnish reports on its financial condition as required by the Government;                                          (c) 						            The contract price is increased so that the penal sum of any bond becomes inadequate in the opinion of the Contracting Officer; or                                          (d) 						            An irrevocable letter of credit (ILC) used as security will expire before the end of the period of required security. If the Contractor does not furnish an acceptable extension or replacement ILC, or other acceptable substitute, at least 30 days before an ILC’s scheduled expiration, the Contracting officer has the right to immediately draw on the ILC.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.228 [Reserved]
#### § 457.9 Appropriation contingency.

Notwithstanding the cancellation date stated in the policy, if there are insufficient funds appropriated by the Congress to deliver the crop insurance program, the policy will automatically terminate without liability.

[59 FR 45972, Sept. 6, 1994]
----

|   | MIDLAND                  LOAN SERVICES, INC.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |   |   |   |
|   | /s/                  Steven W. Smith                         3/1/07                                                       |   |   |   |
|   | Steven                  W.                  Smith                               Date                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |   |   |   |
|   | Chief                  Operating Officer and Executive Vice President                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |   |   |

**A        member of The PNC Financial Services Group**

**T**
**F**

----
#### Rochus Amon et al., Respondents, v. Town of Greenburgh et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action for a judgment declaring that a certain restrictive covenant affecting a stated tract of land is enforeible, for injunctive relief and damages, the Town of Greenburgh, its Town Board and its Supervisor, who are three of the defendants, appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 28, 1969, as denied their motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of .action. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, motion granted and it is declared that the restrictive' covenant is not enforeible. The restrictive covenant which plaintiffs seek to enforce provides that the covenant is subject to any amendments of the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Greenburgh. Accordingly, the recent amendment by the Town Board lifted the restriction on the subject premises. The town coneededly was acting within its power when it agreed with the Green-burgh Housing Authority to co-operate in the construction of a low-income housing project on the premises. Thus the complaint fails to plead a cause of action and should be dismissed. Assuming *arguendo*that the covenant is not subject to amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, an injunction would not be the proper remedy herein. The covenant, by its terms, expires on January 1, 1971 and thus the benefit to plaintiffs of injunctive relief would be small while the detriment to defendants would be great *(McMann*v. *Chasm Power Co.,*211 N. Y. 301, 305). Christ, P. J., Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur; Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur solely on the ground that the benefit to plaintiffs of injunctive relief would be small while the detriment to defendants would be great.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JAMIE LEON MOODY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-319-TKW/MJF

BOUTWELL, et al.,

Defendants.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 7). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed based on 

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with court orders. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the case file.

DONE and ORDERED this 21st day of June, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DANIEL CHAPA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1919

[October 4, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Dan L. Vaughn, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 472011CF000438A.

Jeffrey H. Garland of Jeffrey H. Garland, P.A., Fort Pierce, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. 

Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 51.683 U.S. No. 1 Bright. The requirements for this grade are the same as for U.S. No. 1 except that no fruit may have more than one-tenth of its surface, in the aggregate, affected by discoloration. ( a ) For tolerances see § 51.689.
| U.S. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH						LEADING THE FEDERAL EFFORT ON AGING RESEARCH |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
||
# L_2021303EN.01000301.xml

| 27.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 303/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 303/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/1405

of 20 August 2021

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Vanille de l’île de La Réunion’ (PGI)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France’s application to register the name ‘Vanille de l’île de La Réunion’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France’s application to register the name ‘Vanille de l’île de La Réunion’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Vanille de l’île de La Réunion’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Vanille de l’île de La Réunion’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Vanille de l’île de La Réunion’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.8. – other products listed in Annex I to the Treaty (spices etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 August 2021.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 170, 6.5.2021, p. 13.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:90cr4051–WS/GRJ

NATHANIEL JAMES,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.

770) docketed August 30, 2017. The magistrate judge recommends that

Defendant's motion (doc. 764) for leave to appeal in forma pauperis be denied. The

magistrate judge also recommends that a certificate of appealability be denied.

Defendant has filed objections (doc. 774) to the report and recommendation.

The court has reviewed both the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation as well as the objections filed by Defendant. In his objections,

Defendant makes what are, in essence, the same arguments that this court has

already considered and rejected. Like the magistrate judge, this court finds that
Page 2 of 2

Defendant is not entitled to either (1) leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis,

or (2) a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Defendant’s motion (doc. 764) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is

DENIED.

2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of September , 2017.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### PEOPLE ex rel. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO. v. STATE BOARD OF RAILROAD COM’RS et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

June 27, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company, against the state board of railroad commissioners and others.

No opinion. Motion denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Petie P. Maguire, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Good Earth Land Sales Company (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and

 

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 4, 2011

 

*/s/ Petie P. Maguire                              *

Petie P. Maguire

President, Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Good Earth Land Sales Company and will be retained by Good Earth Land Sales Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
3.101-2 Solicitation and acceptance of

gratuities by Government personnel.

As a rule, no Government employee may solicit or accept, directly or indirectly, any gratuity, gift,

favor, entertainment, loan, or anything of monetary value from anyone who (a) has or is seeking to

obtain Government business with the employee’s agency, (b) conducts activities that are regulated

by the employee’s agency, or (c) has interests that may be substantially affected by the performance

or nonperformance of the employee’s official duties. Certain limited exceptions are authorized in

agency regulations.

Parent topic: 3.101 Standards of conduct.