alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
47.103-1 General.

(a)

(1) Regulations and procedures governing the bill of lading, documentation, payment, and audit of

transportation services acquired by the United States Government are prescribed in 41 CFR part

102-118, Transportation Payment and Audit.

(2) For DoD shipments, corresponding guidance is in DoD 4500.9-R, Defense Transportation

Regulation, Part II.

(b) Under 31 U.S.C. 3726, all agencies are required to establish a prepayment audit program. For

details on the establishment of a prepayment audit, see 41 CFR part 102-118.

(c) The agency designated in paragraph (a)(3) of the clause at 52.247-67 shall forward original

copies of paid freight bills/invoices, bills of lading, passenger coupons, and supporting documents as

soon as possible following the end of the month, in one package for postpayment audit to the

General Services Administration, Transportation Audit Division (QMCA), Crystal Plaza 4, Room 300,

2200 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202. The specified agency shall include the paid freight

bills/invoices, bills of lading, passenger coupons, and supporting documents for first-tier

subcontractors under a cost-reimbursement contract. If the inclusion of the paid freight

bills/invoices, bills of lading, passenger coupons, and supporting documents for any subcontractor in

the shipment is not practicable, the documents may be forwarded to GSA in a separate package.

(d) Any original transportation bills or other documents requested by GSA shall be forwarded

promptly. The specified agency shall ensure that the name of the contracting agency is stamped or

written on the face of the bill before sending it to GSA.

(e) A statement prepared in duplicate by the specified agency shall accompany each shipment of

transportation documents. GSA will acknowledge receipt of the shipment by signing and returning

the copy of the statement. The statement shall show-

(1) The name and address of the specified agency;

(2) The contract number, including any alpha-numeric prefix identifying the contracting office;

(3) The name and address of the contracting office;

(4) The total number of bills submitted with the statement; and

(5) A listing of the respective amounts paid or, in lieu of such listing, an adding machine tape of the

amounts paid showing the Contractor’s voucher or check numbers.

Parent topic: 47.103 Transportation Payment and Audit Regulation.
§ 301.75-10 Interstate movement of regulated articles through a quarantined area. Any regulated article not produced in a quarantined area may be moved interstate through a quarantined area, without a certificate, limited permit, or Departmental permit, if all of the following conditions are met: ( a ) The regulated article is accompanied by either: A receipt showing that the regulated article was purchased outside the quarantined area, or a bill of lading stating the location of the premises where the shipment originated, the type and quantity of regulated articles being moved interstate, and the date the interstate movement began.
( b ) The regulated article is moved through the quarantined area without being unloaded, and no regulated article, except regulated fruit that qualifies for interstate movement from the quarantined area in accordance with § 301.75-7, is added to the shipment in the quarantined area.
( c ) The regulated article is completely covered, or enclosed in containers or in a compartment of a vehicle, during movement through the quarantined area, except that, covering or enclosure is not required if the regulated article is moved through the quarantined area without stopping, except for refueling or for traffic conditions, such as traffic lights or stop signs.
[55 FR 37452, Sept. 11, 1990, as amended at 87 FR 80010, Dec. 29, 2022]
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

BiologyConservation (Environment)EcologyEducational StrategiesElementary Secondary EducationEntomologyEnvironmental EducationRainforestsScience ActivitiesScience CurriculumScientific Literacy

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
§ 5001.118 Ineligible B&I projects The following are ineligible projects for the B&I program only: ( a ) The financing of timeshares, residential trailer parks, apartments, duplexes, or other residential housing where the primary purpose is independent housing except as authorized in § 5001.105(b)(8), or housing development sites except as authorized in § 5001.105(b)(1).
( b ) Projects eligible for funding under B&I that are in excess of $1 million that would either: ( 1 ) Likely result in the transfer of jobs from one area to another and increase direct employment by more than 50 employees. However, this limitation is not to be construed to prohibit assistance for the expansion of an existing business entity through the establishment of a new branch, affiliate, or subsidiary of such entity if the establishment of such branch, affiliate, or subsidiary will not result in an increase in unemployment in the area of original location or in any other area where such entity conducts business operations. An exception is when there is reason to believe that such branch, affiliate, or subsidiary is being established with the intention of closing down the operations of the existing business entity in the area or its original location or in any other area where it conducts such operations; or
( 2 ) Increase direct employment by more than 50 employees, which is calculated to or likely to result in an increase in the production of goods, materials, commodities, or the availability of services or facilities in the area when there is not sufficient demand for such goods, materials, commodities, services, or facilities to employ the efficient capacity of existing competitive commercial or industrial enterprises, unless such financial or other assistance will not have an adverse effect upon existing competitive enterprises in the area.
[85 FR 42518, July 14, 2020, as amended at 85 FR 62197, Oct. 2, 2020]
#### § 52.784 Score sheet for canned red tart pitted cherries.

| Size and kind of container | | | |
| Container mark or identification | | | |
| Label | | | |
| Net weight (ounces) | | | |
| Vacuum (inches) | | | |
| Drained weight (ounces) | | | |
| Sirup designation (extra heavy, heavy, etc.) | | | |
| Brix measurement | | | |
| Size1 | | | |
| Factors | | | |
| | Score points | | |
| Color | 20 | (A) | 18-20 |
| | | (B) | 16-17 |
| | | (C) | 2 14-15 |
| | | (SStd.) | 2 0-13 |
| Freedom from pits | 20 | (A) (b) (C) (SStd.) | 18-20 2 16-17 2 14-15 2 0-13 |
| Freedom from defects | 30 | (A) (B) (C) (SStd.) | 27-30 2 24-26 2 21-23 2 0-20 |
| Character | 30 | (A) | 27-30 |
| | | (B) | 2 24-26 |
| | | (C) | 2 21-23 |
| | | (SStd.) | 2 0-20 |
| Total score | 100 | | |
| Normal flavor | | | |
| Grade | | | |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 See size limitation for U.S. Grade A and U.S. Grade B. | | | |
| 2 Indicates limiting rule. | | | |
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Child BehaviorChild DevelopmentChild RearingInterpersonal CompetenceParent AttitudesParent Child RelationshipParent InfluenceParent RoleParenting SkillsParenting StylesParentsPredictor Variables

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### § 51.2121 Rancidity.

*Rancidity* means that the kernel is noticeably rancid to the taste.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT September 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR FISCAL QUARTER ENDED September 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<CASH>                            1,474,600
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,298,782
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                         384,523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  4,777,403
<PP&E>                            4,234,047
<DEPRECIATION>                    3,299,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   12,995,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             3,248,973
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                          30,722
<COMMON>                          2,719,182
<OTHER-SE>                        6,855,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     12,995,412
<SALES>                           1,461,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  2,455,737
<CGS>                               865,212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     1,552,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,553,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   24,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (1,901,291)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,901,291)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,901,291)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.07)



</TABLE>
52.207-1 Notice of Standard Competition.

As prescribed in 7.305(a), insert the following provision:

Notice of Standard Competition (May 2006)

(a) This solicitation is part of a standard competition under Office of Management and Budget

Circular No. A-76 (Revised), Performance of Commercial Activities, dated May 29, 2003 (hereafter

"the Circular"), to determine whether to accomplish the specified work under contract or by

Government performance.

(b) The Government will evaluate private sector offers, the agency tender, and public reimbursable

tenders, as provided in this solicitation and the Circular.

(c) A performance decision resulting from this standard competition will be publicly announced in

accordance with the Circular. If the performance decision favors a private sector offeror, a contract

will be awarded. If the performance decision favors an agency or a public reimbursable tender, the

Contracting Officer shall establish, respectively, either a Most Efficient Organization letter of

obligation or a fee-for-service agreement, as those terms are defined in the Circular.

(d) As provided in the Circular, directly interested parties may file contests, which are governed by

the procedures in Federal Acquisition Regulation 33.103. Until resolution of any contest, or the

expiration of the time for filing a contest, only legal agents for directly interested parties shall have

access to the certified standard competition form, the agency tender, and public reimbursable

tenders.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.207 [Reserved]
#### § 61.31 License must be posted.

Each licensed sampler shall keep his license conspicuously posted at the place where he functions as a sampler or in such other place as may be approved by the Director.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Nov-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  May-31-1997
<CASH>                        1,612,979
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 71,781
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1,684,760
<PP&E>                        20,704,303
<DEPRECIATION>                (8,731,442)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                15,174,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         472,502
<BONDS>                       2,573,932
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    8,131,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  15,174,430
<SALES>                       1,386,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,430,934
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 631,787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              664,827
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            201,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (67,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (67,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  (67,150)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (1.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (1.25)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 58.630 Stabilizers.

Stabilizers shall be clean and wholesome and consist of one or more of those approved in § 58.605.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1352

AUBREY J. EL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Social

Services, Ex Rel Margo El, Anthony Conyers,

Jr., Commissioner for the Commonwealth of

Virginia Department of Social Services;

NATHANIEL L. YOUNG, JR., Individually and in

his Official Capacity as Director of the

Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Social

Services, Division of Child Support

Enforcement,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District

Judge. (3:05-cv-00648-REP)

Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: July 31, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aubrey J. El, Appellant Pro Se. Judith Williams Jagdmann, James

Walter Hopper, Edward Meade Macon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Aubrey J. El appeals the district court’s orders denying

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action and his motions for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. El v. Commonwealth of Va., No. 3:05-cv-00648-

REP (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 2006). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit ____________

No. 01-3259

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ROBERT E. MERRIWEATHER,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division.

No. 98 CR 182—Rudy Lozano, Judge.

____________

SUBMITTED MAY 28, 2002—DECIDED JUNE 27, 2002

____________

Before BAUER, POSNER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

BAUER, Circuit Judge. The appellant, Robert Merriweather, appeals his conviction upon guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Merriweather argues that the district

court abused its discretion in refusing to allow him to withdraw his guilty plea before accepting it. The government

appropriately confesses error on appeal. Accordingly, we

REVERSE Merriweather’s conviction and REMAND for further proceedings.
2 No. 01-3259

Background

On October 20, 1998, a federal grand jury returned a one

count indictment charging Merriweather with possession

with intent to distribute a detectable quantity of crack cocaine. Following a denial of his motion to suppress evidence,

Merriweather entered a guilty plea. The district court reserved accepting the plea until the pre-sentence report was

prepared.

Merriweather subsequently moved to withdraw his guilty

plea. The district court denied that motion and then accepted the plea. A judgment of conviction was entered and

Merriweather was sentenced to 324 months.

Discussion

We review the district court’s denial of Merriweather’s

motion to withdraw his guilty plea for an abuse discretion.

United States v. LeDonne, 21 F.3d 1418, 1423 (7th Cir.

1994). The district court by definition abused its discretion if it made an error of law. United States v. PalominoRivera, 258 F.3d 656, 658 (7th Cir. 2001).

In United States v. Shaker, this Court reversed the district court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to withdraw

his guilty plea, holding that where a plea has not yet

been accepted by the court, the defendant is entitled to

withdraw his plea freely and without inquiry. 279 F.3d 494,

497-98 (7th Cir. 2002). Because this case is indistinguishable from Shaker (as the government concedes), that decision mandates reversal here. Merriweather is entitled

to withdraw his guilty plea.

We need not reach any additional arguments advanced

by Merriweather in support of his claim that he should be

allowed to withdraw his plea.
No. 01-3259 3

Conclusion

The appellant’s conviction is REVERSED and the case

REMANDED to permit the withdrawal of his guilty plea.

A true Copy:

Teste: 

 ________________________________

Clerk of the United States Court of

Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 

USCA-97-C-006—6-27-02
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2639 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2639

            To suspend temporarily the duty on o-Anisidine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2006

  Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Alexander) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on o-Anisidine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. O-ANISIDINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.29.21      o-Anisidine (CAS    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         No. 90-04-0)                                                       31/2009
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2922.22.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 63.10 Secretary.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States or any other officer or employee of the Department to whom authority has heretofore been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, to act in the Secretary's stead.
# L_2014268EN.01001201.xml

| 9.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 268/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 268/12

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 8 September 2014

appointing a Spanish members and a Spanish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2014/654/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Spanish Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. On 3 October 2011, by Council Decision 2011/661/EU (3), Ms Carmen María SANDOVAL SÁNCHEZ was appointed as alternate member until 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. On 3 October 2011, by Council Decision 2011/661/EU (3), Ms Carmen María SANDOVAL SÁNCHEZ was appointed as alternate member until 25 January 2015.

| (2) | A member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO. An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Carmen María SANDOVAL SÁNCHEZ. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO. An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Carmen María SANDOVAL SÁNCHEZ.

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The followingare hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| (a) | as member:






  — | Mr Alberto GARRE LÓPEZ, Presidente de la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as member:

—

Mr Alberto GARRE LÓPEZ, Presidente de la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia

and

| (b) | as alternate member:






  — | Mr Manuel PLEQUEZUELO ALONSO, Director-General de Participación Ciudadana, Unión Europea y Acción Exterior de la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate member:

—

Mr Manuel PLEQUEZUELO ALONSO, Director-General de Participación Ciudadana, Unión Europea y Acción Exterior de la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 8 September 2014.

For the Council

The President

S. GOZI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 263, 7.10.2011, p. 18.

3

---
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection  with the annual report of North  American  Nickel Inc.  (formerly
Widescope Resources Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A Amendment No. 2 for the
period  ending  December  31,  2011 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward D. Ford, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the  Report  containing  the  financial  statements  of the  Company  fully
     complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2012

/s/ Edward D. Ford
--------------------------------------------
Edward D. Ford
Chief Financial Officer

* A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```