alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014328EN.01006101.xml

| 13.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 328/61

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision 2014/439/CFSP of 8 July 2014 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 200 of 9 July 2014
  )

On page 14, Annex, point II, sole entry:

for:

| | ‘Name | Name
  (Belarusian spelling) | Name
  (Russian Spelling) | Reasons | Date of listing |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Volkov, Vitaliy Nikolayevich | | | Judge at the regional court in Shklov. In January 2012 he decided to transfer former Presidential candidate and opposition activist N. Statkevich to a closed-type prison in Mogilov on the mere basis of alleged violations of the rules of imprisonment in Shklov penal colony IK-17. This decision has thus led to breaches of N. Statkevich's human rights including sleep deprivation and threatening his health. | 9.7.2014’ |

‘Name

Name

(Belarusian spelling)

Name

(Russian Spelling)

Reasons

Date of listing

Volkov, Vitaliy Nikolayevich

Judge at the regional court in Shklov. In January 2012 he decided to transfer former Presidential candidate and opposition activist N. Statkevich to a closed-type prison in Mogilov on the mere basis of alleged violations of the rules of imprisonment in Shklov penal colony IK-17. This decision has thus led to breaches of N. Statkevich's human rights including sleep deprivation and threatening his health.

9.7.2014’

read:

| | Name | Name
  (Belarusian spelling) | Name
  (Russian Spelling) | Reasons |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘233. | Volkov, Vitaliy Nikolayevich | Волкаў, Віталь Мiкалаевiч | Волков, Виталий Николаевич | Judge at the regional court in Shklov. In January 2012 he decided to transfer former Presidential candidate and opposition activist N. Statkevich to a closed-type prison in Mogilov on the mere basis of alleged violations of the rules of imprisonment in Shklov penal colony IK-17. This decision has thus led to breaches of N. Statkevich's human rights including sleep deprivation and threatening his health.’ |

Name

Name

(Belarusian spelling)

Name

(Russian Spelling)

Reasons

‘233.

Volkov, Vitaliy Nikolayevich

Волкаў, Віталь Мiкалаевiч

Волков, Виталий Николаевич

Judge at the regional court in Shklov. In January 2012 he decided to transfer former Presidential candidate and opposition activist N. Statkevich to a closed-type prison in Mogilov on the mere basis of alleged violations of the rules of imprisonment in Shklov penal colony IK-17. This decision has thus led to breaches of N. Statkevich's human rights including sleep deprivation and threatening his health.’

---
32.006-2 Definition.       *Remedy coordination official*, as used in this section, means the person or entity in the agency who coordinates within that agency the administration of criminal, civil, administrative, and contractual remedies resulting from investigations of fraud or corruption related to procurement activities. (See                 10 U.S.C. 3806(a)                              and 41 U.S.C.4506(a).)    **Parent topic:** 32.006 Reduction or suspension of contract payments upon finding of fraud.
42.1701 Procedures.

(a) Negotiation of forward pricing rate agreements (FPRA’s) may be requested by the contracting

officer or the contractor or initiated by the administrative contracting officer (ACO). In determining

whether or not to establish such an agreement, the ACO should consider whether the benefits to be

derived from the agreement are commensurate with the effort of establishing and monitoring it.

Normally, FPRA’s should be negotiated only with contractors having a significant volume of

Government contract proposals. The cognizant contract administration agency shall determine

whether an FPRA will be established.

(b) The ACO shall obtain the contractor’s forward pricing rate proposal and require that it include

cost or pricing data that are accurate, complete, and current as of the date of submission (but see

15.407-3(c)). The ACO shall invite the cognizant contract auditor and contracting offices having a

significant interest to participate in developing a Government objective and in the negotiations.

Upon completing negotiations, the ACO shall prepare a price negotiation memorandum (PNM) (see

15.406-3) and forward copies of the PNM and FPRA to the cognizant auditor and to all contracting

offices that are known to be affected by the FPRA.

(c) The FPRA shall provide specific terms and conditions covering expiration, application, and data

requirements for systematic monitoring to ensure the validity of the rates. The agreement shall

provide for cancellation at the option of either party and shall require the contractor to submit to the

ACO and to the cognizant contract auditor any significant change in cost or pricing data used to

support the FPRA.

(d) When an FPRA is invalid, the contractor should submit and negotiate a new proposal to reflect

the changed conditions. If an FPRA has not been established or has been invalidated, the ACO will

issue a forward pricing rate recommendation (FPRR) to buying activities with documentation to

assist negotiators. In the absence of an FPRA or FPRR, the ACO shall include support for rates

utilized.

(e) The ACO may negotiate continuous updates to the FPRA. The FPRA will provide specific terms

and conditions covering notification, application, and data requirements for systematic monitoring to

ensure the validity of the rates.

Parent topic: Subpart 42.17 - Forward Pricing Rate Agreements
52.211-3 Availability of Specifications Not

Listed in the GSA Index of Federal

Specifications, Standards and Commercial

Item Descriptions.

As prescribed in 11.204(c), insert a provision substantially the same as the following:

Availability of Specifications Not Listed in the GSA Index of Federal Specifications, Standards and

Commercial Item Descriptions (June 1988)

The specifications cited in this solicitation may be obtained from:

(Activity) address) ________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

(Telephone number) _________________________________

(Person to be contacted) ______________________________

The request should identify the solicitation number and the specification requested by date, title,

and number, as cited in the solicitation.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.211 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of George Levine, Petitioner, v. John P. Lomenzo, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to article *78*of the CPLR to review and annul a determination of the respondent Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated June 24, 1968 and made after a hearing, which revoked petitioner’s real estate salesman’s license for “ untrustworthiness ” under section 441-c of the Real Property Law. Determination annulled, on the law, with costs, and charges dismissed. The revocation of petitioner’s license was based on a finding of “ demonstrated untrustworthiness ” to act as a real estate salesman (Real Property Law, § 441-c, subd. 1). Petitioner was found guilty of having discriminated in refusing to offer apartment listings to persons of the Negro race, by reason of their color. In our opinion the administrative determination was not supported by the requisite substantial evidence *(Matter of Holland*v. *Edwards,*307 N. Y. 38, 44). The hearing officer found that two apartment listings which had been offered by petitioner to a white couple were shortly thereafter denied by him to a Negro couple who asked for listings in the same area. In our view, the record does not • establish that the respective couples requested listings in the *same*geographic area. Furthermore, petitioner did offer the Negro couple the only listing he had for the precise geographic area they requested, notwithstanding that the apartment was in a “white” apartment house in a “white” neighborhood. Upon the record as a whole, the finding of “ untrustworthiness ” is not supported by substantial evidence. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
# L_2014217EN.01004801.xml

| 23.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 217/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 217/48

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION 2014/487/CFSP

of 22 July 2014

implementing Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP of 28 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | On 28 February 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/137/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 28 February 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/137/CFSP.

| (2) | The Council considers that there are no longer grounds for keeping one person on the list set out in Annex IV to Decision 2011/137/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Council considers that there are no longer grounds for keeping one person on the list set out in Annex IV to Decision 2011/137/CFSP.

| (3) | Decision 2011/137/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2011/137/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The entry for the following person shall be deleted from the list set out in Annex IV to Decision 2011/137/CFSP:

| 23. | ZIDANE, Mohamad Ali. |
| --- | --- |

23.

ZIDANE, Mohamad Ali.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 22 July 2014.

For the Council

The President

C. ASHTON

---

(1)  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 53.

1

---
Exhibit 12.3
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mindray Medical International Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   /s/ Ronald Ede
52.204-1 Approval of Contract.       As prescribed in 4.103, insert the following clause:          Approval of Contract (Dec 1989)          This contract is subject to the written approval of [*identify title of designated agency official here*] and shall not be binding until so approved.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.204 [Reserved]
#### § 52.35 Accessibility for sampling.

Each applicant shall cause the processed products for which inspection is requested to be made accessible for proper sampling. Failure to make any lot accessible for proper sampling shall be sufficient cause for postponing inspection service until such time as such lot is made accessible for proper sampling.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             870
<SECURITIES>                                       624
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4534
<ALLOWANCES>                                       158
<INVENTORY>                                       1474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  7982
<PP&E>                                             760
<DEPRECIATION>                                     669
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   11473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5850
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             1200
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                        3465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     11473
<SALES>                                          27289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 27289
<CGS>                                            25875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       85
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (299)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    204
<INCOME-TAX>                                        20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                184
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       184
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
#### § 54.1007 Availability of service.

Service under these regulations may be made available to the designers, fabricators, users, or other interested person or party, of the equipment or utensils. Subject to the provisions of this subpart, services shall be performed only when a qualified design review specialist is available, and when the location of the equipment or utensils, evaluation facilities and conditions, as determined by the Chief, are suitable for conducting such service.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SYNTELLECT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF SEPTEMBER
30, 1997, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF SYNTELLECT, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,490
<SECURITIES>                                     2,967
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,164
<INVENTORY>                                      3,081
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,506
<PP&E>                                          27,269
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,155
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           135
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,816
<SALES>                                         18,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,919
<CGS>                                           12,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,726
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   240
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  74
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,844)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,844)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,844)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.36)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Novell, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), Dana C. Russell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * *



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ DANA C. RUSSELL                                              
|Dana C. Russell Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 11, 2010
OPERATIONS OTHER THAN WAR (OOTW): THE TECHNOLOGICALDIMENSIONWritten ByTHE CENTER FOR ADVANCED COMMAND CONCEPTS AND TECHNOLOGY(ACT)
NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITYNDU Press Book
November 1995

**Contents**
Foreword
Acknowledgements
Executive Summary
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Requirements for OOTW Technologies
Chapter 3: Technologies and Their Implications
Chapter 4: OOTW Technology Workshop Insights
Contact     UsNDU     Press Home PageNDU Home PageINSS Home Page

Last Update:          October 1, 2002
#### Dominica Sciaruto, Respondent, v. Edith M. Scovell et al., Appellants.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cortland County, denying appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Respondent sustained personal injuries when while walking to work she was struck by a motor vehicle driven by appellant, Edith M. Scovell, a co-worker. The accident, which happened 10 to 15 minutes before the 7:00 a.m. scheduled time for work to commence, occurred at the point at which the public sidewalk along the easterly side of Main Street, Cortland, must be crossed by vehicles to enter the employer’s parking lot. Appellants urge the complaint should be dismissed because respondent’s exclusive remedy was under Workmen’s Compensation (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 29, subd. 6). Respondent’s position is that the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law are not applicable because she was not in the “ course of employment” until she entered the employer’s plant. Special Term held that the test was whether the property on which the accident occurred was *“*under the dominion and control of the employer ” and denied summary judgment on the ground that there was no evidence *“*to show to whom this sidewalk belonged and who exercised dominion and control over it.” We agree with Special Term. Since generally the risks of travel to and from work are not risks of employment (e.g., *Matter of Mahar*v. *Hills Baking Co.,*22 A D 2d 983) if the employer did not exercise dominion and control over the part of the sidewalk constituting part of the entrance to the parking lot, there would be no valid basis to find that the accident was within the course of employment and that respondent’s exclusive remedy was Workmen’s Compensation benefits. However, conversely if such dominion and control over that portion of the sidewalk existed the defense of subdivision 6 of section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law would be available *(Matter of Kane*v. *New York State Dept. of Ins.,*27 A D 2d 344). As Special Term noted the question of dominion and control presents an issue of fact which cannot be determined on the instant motion and, accordingly, summary judgment was properly denied. Order affirmed, with costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.
§ 621.12 How to request assistance. For a cooperative study a governor, or a Federal, State, or local government agency must submit a written request and a Proposal to Study (PTS) through the NRCS State Conservationist to the Chief. Assistance in preparing the proposal may be obtained by contacting the State Conservationist. The State Conservationist sends the request and proposal with comments to the Chief for consideration. The proposal should: ( a ) Describe the basin or study area, including a map of the study area;
( b ) Explain the need for the study;
( c ) Explain the need for USDA participation;
( d ) State the responsibility and authority of the requesting agency in the study;
( e ) Estimate the extent of participation of other Federal and State agencies;
( f ) Discuss views and priorities of affected soil conservation districts regarding the proposed study;
( g ) Briefly describe the intended management organization of the study;
( h ) Specifically describe the expected results of the study;
( i ) Identify primary users of the study results and the manner in which the results will be used;
( j ) State the relationship of the study to ongoing and completed river basin studies;
( k ) State that procedures for informing clearinghouses and for eliciting public participation will be followed;
( l ) Estimate the duration and scope of the study; and
( m ) Estimate the study costs by year and agency.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JAMES RUSSELL JOHNSON,,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 5:20cv262/TKW/EMT

ANDY PACE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 10). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed based on 

Plaintiff’s failure to fully disclose his litigation history. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 

1915A(b)(1), and the Clerk shall close the case file.
Page 2 of 2

DONE and ORDERED this 21st day of June, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE