alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
52.217-6 Option for Increased Quantity.       As prescribed in 17.208(d), insert a clause substantially the same as the following:          Option for Increased Quantity (Mar 1989)          The Government may increase the quantity of supplies called for in the Schedule at the unit price specified. The Contracting Officer may exercise the option by written notice to the Contractor within ______________________ [*insert in the clause the period of time in which the Contracting Officer has to exercise the option*]. Delivery of the added items shall continue at the same rate as the like items called for under the contract, unless the parties otherwise agree.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.217 [Reserved]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 2, 2020

No. 04-20-00023-CV

Robert THOMPSON,

Appellant

v.

Robert NIETO,

Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CV08856

Honorable J Frank Davis, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On February 21, 2020, this court notified the court reporter that the reporter’s record was 

late. The court reporter responded to our notice by stating that the reporter’s record has not been 

filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for 

preparing the record and appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. 

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten 

(10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements 

have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the 

reporter’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due 

within thirty (30) days from the date of the clerk’s record is filed, and the court will consider 

only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a 

decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of March, 2020.
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
# Appendix G Comparative Modeling Results Page 1

Clam Food Web/Fish

– All Transects

– 75 th 

# Percentile K d

Data Source Water Year/

Flow Season Month

Year Transect Min Kd 25th

p er c e n t il e

Kd Mean

Kd Median

Kd 75th

p er c e n t il e

Kd Max Kd Allowable

D iss o l ved

Se Conc

(ug/L) Predicted

Allowable

Particulate Se

Conc (ug/g dw) Predicted

Allowable Inv

Se Conc

(ug/g dw) Predicted

Tissue Se

Conc

(ug/g dw) Name Value U ni ts

Mean 75th Kd Focused Seaward 3966 0.256 1.017 7.7 8.5 Fish (Clam) Target 8.5 ug/g

Prey TTF 7.6 dimensionless

C&C/Doblin wet/high Jun

- 98 Seaward 712 2059 3198 2330 2491 11054 0.408 1.017 7.7 8.5 Fish TTF 1.1 dimensionless

C&C/Doblin wet/high Jun

- 98 Focused Seaward 712 946 1180 1180 1414 1647 0.719 1.017 7.7 8.5

C&C/Doblin wet/low Oct

- 98 Seaward 2202 3782 6501 4963 6525 26912 0.156 1.017 7.7 8.5

C&C/Doblin wet/low Oct

- 98 Focused Seaward 2202 2286 3435 3111 4498 5212 0.226 1.017 7.7 8.5

C&C/Doblin wet/high Apr

- 99 Seaward 1151 3253 5824 5252 7151 13317 0.142 1.017 7.7 8.5

C&C/Doblin wet/high Apr

- 99 Focused Seaward 2274 2414 2666 2555 2861 3168 0.355 1.017 7.7 8.5

C&C/Doblin normal/low Nov

- 99 Seaward 3496 5893 7614 6569 8114 19785 0.125 1.017 7.7 8.5

C&C/Doblin normal/low Nov

- 99 Focused Seaward 3496 5019 5986 6142 7089 7725 0.143 1.017 7.7 8.5

L&S above normal/high Jan

- 03 Landward 554 1628 2268 2269 3212 3503 0.317 1.017 7.7 8.5

L&S above normal/high Apr

- 03 Landward 927 1898 2684 2773 3564 4351 0.285 1.017 7.7 8.5

L&S below normal/low Oct

- 03 Landward 1628 3712 5855 4720 8569 12650 0.119 1.017 7.7 8.5

L&S below normal/high Jan

- 04 Landward 1256 1748 2981 2642 3808 6398 0.267 1.017 7.7 8.5

Tetra Tech Dry Weather Sep

- 10 Focused Seaward 211 2663 3783 3501 4387 7482 0.232 1.017 7.7 8.5

Tetra Tech Dry Weather Sep

- 10 Landward 235 4117 5981 5529 7580 12442 0.134 1.017 7.7 8.5

Tetra Tech Dry Weather Sep

- 10 Seaward 211 2704 3415 3134 3789 7482 0.268 1.017 7.7 8.5

Tetra Tech Wet Weather Mar

- 11 Focused Seaward 2674 2711 4595 3560 6471 7558 0.157 1.017 7.7 8.5

Tetra Tech Wet Weather Mar

- 11 Seaward 824 2683 3411 3073 3541 7558 0.287 1.017 7.7 8.5

Tetra Tech Wet Weather Mar

- 11 Landward 2711 4544 9003 9600 13975 14186 0.073 1.017 7.7 8.5

Tetra Tech Dry Weather Jul

- 11 Landward 3966 4114 4263 4263 4411 4559 0.230 1.017 7.7 8.5

Tetra Tech Dry Weather Oct

- 11 Seaward 3758 4849 6806 6227 8651 12793 0.118 1.017 7.7 8.5

Tetra Tech Dry Weather Oct

- 11 Focused Seaward 3758 4197 5594 5583 6290 8844 0.162 1.017 7.7 8.5

Tetra Tech Dry Weather Oct

- 11 Landward 3978 7548 10809 10492 11838 22420 0.086 1.017 7.7 8.5

Tetra Tech Wet Weather Apr

- 12 Focused Seaward 2272 3005 3381 3456 3592 4744 0.283 1.017 7.7 8.5

Tetra Tech Wet Weather Apr

- 12 Landward 2043 4473 5088 5806 6421 6697 0.158 1.017 7.7 8.5

Tetra Tech Wet Weather Apr

- 12 Seaward 2272 2818 3536 3399 3953 5519 0.257 1.017 7.7 8.5

# Appendix G Comparative Modeling Results Page 5
#### § 52.15 Postponing inspection service.

If the inspector determines that it is not possible to accurately ascertain the quality or condition of a processed product immediately after processing because the product has not reached equilibrium in color, sirup density, or drained weight, or for any other substantial reason, he may postpone inspection service for such period as may be necessary.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Wang Xiao Peng, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of China Culture Resorts Holdings, Inc. . for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2008;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting;





5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors:





(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal controls which could adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the small business issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls.





Date:  June 20, 2011




/s/Wang Xiao PengName: Wang Xiao PengTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer & Principal Accounting Officer)
116 STAT. 1482 PUBLIC LAW 107–235—OCT. 4, 2002

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 112:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

Oct. 3, considered and passed House and Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–235

107th Congress

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

107–229 is amended by striking the date specified in section 107(c)

and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘October 11, 2002’’.

Approved October 4, 2002.

Ante, p. 1467.

Oct. 4, 2002

[H.J. Res. 112]
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 11

                      ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (1)
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (In Thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                   Three Months Ended               Nine Months Ended
                                                            ---------------------------      --------------------------
                                                               June 27,      June 28,         June 27,         June 28,
                                                                 1997          1996             1997             1996
                                                              -----------   -----------      ------------       ------
<S>                                                         <C>              <C>               <C>              <C>     
Earnings:


Net Income                                                  $ 30,134         $ 28,636          $145,741         $ 67,335

Preferred stock dividends                                       --               (236)             --               (731)
                                                            --------         --------          --------         --------


Earnings applicable to common stock                         $ 30,134         $ 28,400          $145,741         $ 66,604
                                                            ========         ========          ========         ========


Shares:

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding (2)                                      41,666           43,909            42,237           44,624

Impact of potential exercise opportunities
  under the ARAMARK Ownership Program                          2,131            2,469             2,496            2,678
                                                            --------         --------          --------         --------

Total common and common equivalent shares                     43,797           46,378            44,733           47,302
                                                            ========         ========          ========         ========

Fully diluted earnings per common and
  common equivalent share                                   $    .69         $    .61          $   3.26         $   1.41
                                                            ========         ========          ========         ========
</TABLE>




(1)  Primary and fully diluted earnings per share are approximately the same.

(2)  Includes Class B plus Class A Common Shares stated on a Class B Common
     Share Equivalent Basis.
#### § 503.15 Exceptions.

The Director, PIADC, may, in specific cases, make prior written exceptions to the rules and regulations in this part if he determines it to be in the best interest of the Government.
§ 371.2 The Office of the Administrator. ( a ) *The Administrator.* ( 1 ) The Administrator of APHIS formulates, directs, and supervises the execution of APHIS policies, programs, and activities.
( 2 ) The Administrator is authorized to take any action authorized by law and deemed necessary to carry out APHIS functions. Delegations of authority by the Administrator and provisions for redelegations of authority are stated in § 371.11.
( b ) *The Associate Administrator.* The Associate Administrator of APHIS shares responsibility with the Administrator for general direction and supervision of APHIS programs and activities. The Associate Administrator may act for the Administrator.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN RE: COURT OPERATIONS Case No. 4:95mc40111

UNDER THE EXIGENT 

CIRCUMSTANCES 

CREATED BY COVID-19

__________________________________________/

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

Congress has passed legislation authorizing the use of video and telephone 

conferencing, under certain circumstances and with the consent of the defendant, 

for various criminal events during the course of the COVID-19 emergency. See 

the CARES Act, H.R. 748. The Judicial Conference of the United States has also 

found that emergency conditions due to the national emergency declared by the 

President have affected and will materially affect the functioning of the federal 

courts generally.

As Chief Judge and with the consent of all active and senior United States 

District Judges in the Northern District of Florida, pursuant to Section 15002(b)(1) 

of the legislation, I hereby authorize the use of video conferencing, or telephone 

conferencing if video conferencing is not reasonably available, for all events listed 

in Sections 15002 of the legislation. 
2

Pursuant to Section 15002(b)(2), I further specifically find that felony pleas 

under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and felony sentencings 

under Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure cannot be conducted in 

person in this district without seriously jeopardizing public health and safety. As a 

result, if judges in individual cases find, for specific reasons, that felony pleas or 

sentencings in those cases cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the 

interests of justice, the judges may, with the defendants’ consent, use video 

conferencing for felony pleas and sentencings in those cases, and may use 

teleconferencing if video conferencing is not reasonably available. 

Pursuant to Section 15002(b)(3) of the legislation, this authorization will 

remain in effect for 90 days unless terminated earlier. If emergency conditions 

continue to exist 90 days from the entry of this order, I will review the 

authorization and determine whether to extend it.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of March, 2020.

s/_Mark E. Walker________ __ _______

Chief United States District Judge
26.404 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.226-6, Promoting Excess Food Donation to Nonprofit Organizations, in

solicitations and contracts greater than $30,000 for the provision, service, or sale of food in the

United States.

Parent topic: Subpart 26.4 - Food Donations to Nonprofit Organizations
Is Your Used Crib Safe?

Before you put your baby to sleep in a used crib, check to be sure

it's safe. A safe crib has --

Æ A firm, tight-fitting mattress

Æ No loose, missing, or broken hardware or slats

Æ No more than 2 3/8" between the slats (about the width

 of a soda can)

Æ No corner posts over 1/16" high

Æ No cutout designs in the headboard or footboard

If your used crib isn't safe, don't use it.

DESTROY IT.

IT COULD SAVE YOUR BABY'S LIFE!

For more information, contact:

U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20207

TOLL-FREE HOTLINE WEBSITE

(Se habla Español) www.cpsc.gov

800-638-2772
# 1.102-4           Acquisition Team.       

The purpose of defining the Federal *Acquisition* Team (Team) in the Guiding Principles is to ensure that participants in the System are identified beginning with the customer and ending with the contractor of the product or service. By identifying the team members in this manner, teamwork, unity of purpose, and open communication among the members of the Team in sharing the vision and achieving the goal of the System are encouraged. Individual team members will participate in the *acquisition* process at the appropriate time.

**Parent topic:**1.102 Statement of guiding principles for the Federal Acquisition System.
#### § 612.7 Forecast user responsibility.

The forecast user's obligation to the federal government is to give appropriate credit and recognition to NRCS for information furnished. The Federal Government does not assume any responsibility for management decisions the user makes which may be based in whole or part on information provided by NRCS.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             471
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      119
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    73
<PP&E>                                          10,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              210
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,214
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,187
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   840
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   623
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (4)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
# L_2013217EN.01004001.xml

| 13.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 217/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 217/40

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 768/2013 of 8 August 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 917/2004 on detailed rules to implement Council Regulation (EC) No 797/2004 on measures improving general conditions for the production and marketing of apiculture products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 214 of 9 August 2013
  )

On the cover page and on page 7, the adoption date (title and signature) of the Regulation:

for:

‘
  8 August 2013
  ’,

read:

‘
  9 August 2013
  ’.

---
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 4/16/96 TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TOBY LAURA POLASKY,

Defendant - Appellant. No. 95-4175 (D. Ct. No. 95-CV-64) (D. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This appeal is from an order of the district court dismissing pro se appellant’s claims brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the grounds that none of the claims are jurisdictional and all relate to allegations of misconduct by the United States. Appellant- 2 -

argues on appeal that the district court erred in refusing to grant a hearing on her motion brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, where she had argued that newly discovered evidence warranted review by the district court and authorized such a hearing. We affirm. Appellant entered a nolo contendere plea in the United States District Court. The plea entered by appellant followed a series of motions during which appellant sought to show outrageous government conduct and a failure on the part of government officials to preserve exculpatory evidence. Despite appellant’s recharacterization of the evidence regarding the government’s actions at this point, appellant has waived the right to appeal those issues or to raise them on a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Appellant’s nolo contendere plea in this case waives all nonjurisdictional defects. Tollett v. Henderson , 411 U.S. 258 (1973). None of the allegations made in the district court nor those raised on appeal are jurisdictional. We therefore AFFIRM the order of the district court dismissing this action. The mandate shall issue forthwith. ENTERED FOR THE COURT
Deanell Reece Tacha Circuit Judge
# 22.406-13 Semiannual enforcement reports.

A semiannual report on compliance with and enforcement of the *construction* labor standards requirements of the *Construction* Wage Rate Requirements statute and Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards statute is required from each *contracting* agency. The reporting periods are October 1 through March 31 and April 1 through September 30. The reports *shall* only contain information as to the enforcement actions of the *contracting* agency and *shall* be prepared as prescribed in Department of Labor memoranda and submitted to the Department of Labor within 30 days after the end of the reporting period. This report has been assigned interagency report control number 1482-DOL-SA.

**Parent topic:**22.406 Administration and enforcement.