alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 51.1434 Color classifications. ( a ) The skin color of pecan kernels is described in terms of the color classifications provided in this section. When specified to a lighter color classification, that color may be used to describe the lot in connection with the grade. ( 1 ) Light means that the kernel is mostly golden color or lighter, with not more than 25 percent of the surface darker than golden, and none of the surface darker than light brown.
( 2 ) Light amber means that the kernel has more than 25 percent of the surface light brown, but not more than 25 percent of surface darker than light brown, and none of the surface darker than medium brown.
( 3 ) Amber means that the kernel has more than 25 percent of the surface medium brown, but not more than 25 percent of surface darker than medium brown, and none of the surface darker than dark brown (very dark brown or blackish-brown discoloration).
( 4 ) Dark amber means that the kernel has more than 25 percent of the surface dark brown, but not more than 25 percent of surface darker than dark brown (very dark brown or blackish-brown discoloration).
( b ) U.S. Department of Agriculture kernel color standards, PEC-MC-1, illustrate the color intensities implied by the terms “golden,” “light brown,” “medium brown,” and “dark brown” referred to in paragraph (a) of this section. The color standards are available at: *https://www.ams.usda.gov/grades-standards .*
Compensatory Arrangements with Directors



 Exhibit 10.4 
 Compensatory Arrangements with Directors 
 The amount of the annual cash retainer, committee chair cash retainers and
restricted stock grants for our non-employee directors for the current year are set forth in the table below. 
  

									
	Name	  	Position/Chair	    	Annual Retainer	    	Committee
Chair Retainer	    	Annual Equity
Grant(1)
	 Noel Posternak
	  	 Lead Independent Director,
  
 Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
	    	$125,000	    	—	    	28,961 shares
					
	 Robert Goldman
	  	Compensation Committee	    	$  35,000	    	$10,000	    	19,307 shares
					
	 Michael Porter
	  	Corporate Development Committee	    	$  35,000	    	$  5,000	    	15,464 shares
					
	 Donald Grierson
	  	Audit Committee Chair	    	$  35,000	    	$10,000	    	19,307 shares

  

	(1)	The restrictions on the shares will lapse on the earlier of the date of the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or March 15, 2010, provided the person remains a director on
that date and pursuant to our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2684 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2684

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Mixed Xylidines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2006

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Mixed Xylidines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXED XYLIDINES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.29.21        Mixed Xylidines (CAS    Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           No. 1300-73-8)                                                    31/2009          ''
                           (provided for in                                                                    .
                           subheading
                           2921.49.50)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
28.102-3 Contract clauses.       (a) 						            Insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 52.228-15, Performance and Payment Bonds-Construction, in solicitations and contracts for construction that contain a requirement for performance and payment bonds if the resultant contract is expected to exceed $150,000. The contracting officer may revise paragraphs (b)(1) and/or (b)(2) of the clause to establish a lower percentage in accordance with 28.102-2(b). If the provision at 52.228-1 is not included in the solicitation, the contracting officer must set a period of time for return of executed bonds.                                          (b) 						            Insert the clause at 52.228-13, Alternative Payment Protections, in solicitations and contracts for construction, when the estimated or actual value exceeds $35,000 but does not exceed $150,000. Complete the clause by specifying the payment protections selected (see 28.102-1(b)(1)) and the deadline for submission. The contracting officer may revise paragraph (b) of the clause to establish a lower percentage in accordance with 28.102-2(c).    **Parent topic:** 28.102 Performance and payment bonds and alternative payment protections for construction contracts.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of KCAP Financial, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the Report), I, Edward U. Gilpin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 7, 2018

          

          By:/s/ Edward U. GilpinEdward U. Gilpin Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Case No. 3:20cr91/MCR

ANDRE PIERRE FRANK

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. 

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects 

mentioned in Rule 11, I determined the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary and 

the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of 

the essential elements thereof. I therefore recommend the plea of guilty be 

accepted and the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence imposed 

accordingly.

Dated: April 19, 2021.

/s/ Charles J. Kahn, Jr. 

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00091-MCR Document 27 Filed 04/19/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cr91/MCR

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed 

within twenty-four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different 

deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court=s internal use 

only and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the 

magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a magistrate 

judge’s findings or recommendations contained in a report and 

recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1) 

waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court’s order based on 

unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir. 

Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. ' 636.

Case 3:20-cr-00091-MCR Document 27 Filed 04/19/21 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JONATHAN VARGAS, individually and 

on behalf of others similarly situated,

Plaintiff, Case No. 1:20-cv-00224-AW-GRJ

v.

SQUEAKY KLEAN SERVICES, INC, 

a Foreign Profit Corporation,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN

Plaintiff, JONATHAN VARGAS, gives notice of filing the attached Consent to Join

executed by Victor Vargas, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

DATED: October 9, 2020. Respectfully submitted,

s/ ANDREW R. FRISCH______

ANDREW R. FRISCH

MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.

8151 Peters Road., 4th Floor

Plantation, Florida 33324

Telephone: (954) WORKERS

Facsimile: (954) 327-3013

E-mail: AFrisch@forthepeople.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:20-cv-00224-AW-GRJ Document 5 Filed 10/09/20 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 9th day of October 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which I understand will send a notice 

of electronic filing to all parties of record.

/s/ ANDREW R. FRISCH

Andrew R. Frisch

 

Case 1:20-cv-00224-AW-GRJ Document 5 Filed 10/09/20 Page 2 of 2
COLLECTED BY
Alexa Crawls
Alexa Internet
Wayback Machine
alexa_dv
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:96-cr-00020-MP-AK

JOHN CALVIN EVERETT,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 501, Motion for reconsideration of the order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence based on 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendments

706, 711 and 715 to the sentencing guidelines. As stated in the order at Doc. 498, the amount of

drugs attributable to defendant is still well beyond the threshold for base offense level 38 to

apply. Accordingly, he is not entitled to a reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and the

motion at Doc. 501 is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2008

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:96-cr-00020-MW-GRJ Document 507 Filed 12/15/08 Page 1 of 1
Order issued February 13, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00375-CV

———————————

RWS TRANSPORT, L.P. D/B/A REPUBLIC WASTE SERVICES AND 

BOBBY R. MATTHEWS, Appellants

V.

KARLA KEITH, Appellee

On Appeal from the 23rd District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 50809

MEMORANDUM ORDER

The parties have filed a joint motion, representing that the parties have 

reached a settlement agreement and requesting that the Court abate this appeal and 

permit proceedings in the trial court, as necessary, to effectuate their agreement. 
2

Accordingly, we grant the motion, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to 

permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the parties’ agreement. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(C). The appeal shall be abated until such time as either party 

file a motion to reinstate and dismiss the appeal, no later than 60 days from the 

date of this order. If the agreement is not finalized by that date, appellants shall 

files a report advising the Court on the status of the proceedings in the district court

and requesting an extension of the abatement. The Court will dismiss the appeal, 

without further notice, if no motion to reinstate and dismiss the appeal or no status 

report is filed within 60 days of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.
§ 52.3754 Size designations for whole and pitted styles. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) “Average count” for canned whole ripe olives is determined from all containers in the sample and is calculated on the basis of the drained weight of the olives.
( 2 ) Diameters of canned whole and pitted ripe olives are determined by measuring the smallest diameters at the largest circumferences at right angles to the longitudinal axes of the olives. The longitudinal axis is a line running from the stem to the apex of the olive.
( b ) *Size determination.* Size of canned whole or pitted olives shall conform to the applicable count per pound range indicated in Table I in the case of whole olives, or conform closely to the applicable illustration in Table I in the case of pitted olives. When the count per pound of whole olives falls between two count ranges, the size designation shall be the next smaller size.
[42 FR 38585, July 29, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 39564, Aug. 4, 1981. Redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, and amended at 48 FR 41012, Sept. 13, 1983]
19.1309 Contract clauses.

(a)The contracting officer shall insert the clause 52.219-3, Notice of HUBZone Set-Aside or SoleSource Award, in solicitations and contracts for acquisitions that are set aside or awarded on a solesource basis to, HUBZone small business concerns under 19.1305 or 19.1306. This includes

multiple-award contracts when orders may be set aside for HUBZone small business concerns as

described in 8.405-5 and 16.505(b)(2)(i)(F) or when orders may be issued directly to one HUBZone

small business concern in accordance with 19.504(c)(1)(ii).

(b)The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.219-4, Notice of Price Evaluation Preference

for HUBZone Small Business Concerns, in solicitations and contracts for acquisitions conducted

using full and open competition.

(c)For use of clause 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting, see the prescription at 19.507(e).

(d) For use of clause 52.219-33, Nonmanufacturer Rule, see the prescription at 19.507(h).

Parent topic: Subpart 19.13 - Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) Program
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

      ( print page 74678)    
Pursuant to the Food for Peace Act of 2008, notice is hereby given that the Request for Applications for Title II Non-Emergency Food Aid Programs will be available to interested parties for general viewing.

                    For individuals who wish to review, the Request for Applications for Title II Non-Emergency Food Aid Programs will be available via the Food for Peace Web site:                     *http://www.usaid.gov/​our_​work/​humanitarian_​assistance/​ffp/​progpolicy.html*                     on or about December 6, 2010. Interested parties can also receive a copy of the Request for Applications for Title II Non-Emergency Food Aid Programs by contacting the Office of Food for Peace, U.S. Agency for International Development, RRB 7.06-152, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20523-7600.                

Juli Majernik,

Grants Manager, Policy and Technical Division, Office of Food for Peace, Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-30195 Filed 11-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. CASE NO. 3:20cr40-13/MCR

SAMANTHA O’BANION

______________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of the 

Defendant, SAMANTHA O’BANION, to Count One of the Indictment is hereby 

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of June 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
32.502 Preaward matters.

This section covers matters that generally are relevant only before contract award. This does not

preclude taking actions discussed here after award, if appropriate; e.g., postaward addition of a

Progress Payments clause for consideration.

32.502-1 Use of customary progress payments.

32.502-2 Contract finance office clearance.

32.502-3 Solicitation provisions.

32.502-4 Contract clauses.

Parent topic: Subpart 32.5 - Progress Payments Based on Costs
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,423,240
<SECURITIES>                                   942,075
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,365,315
<PP&E>                                      18,986,579
<DEPRECIATION>                                 168,190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             21,351,,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,493
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,233,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,351,894
<SALES>                                        484,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               510,297
<CGS>                                           17,298
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               135,803
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                357,196
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            357,196
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   357,196
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.17
        

</TABLE>
|  Home | ***DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY ***
**News & Information>Media Resources>Director's Bio**
 Deployed Military  Family Support
 About DTRA
 News &   Information 
-Conferences-Factsheets-Historical Materials-How to Find DTRA-Media Resources-Points of Contact-Speeches & Transcripts-Threat Reduction Literature

 Employment
 Equal Employment  (PDF file)
 Acquisition
 FOIA
 Contacts
 Site Map
 Related Links
 Feedback
 FAQ
 DefenseLINK Privacy &   Security E-mail 
  
 
  |
|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 51.885 U.S. No. 1 Institutional. “U.S. No. 1 Institutional” grapes must have no less than 95 percent of the containers in the lot legibly marked “Institutional Pack.” Further requirements for this grade include grapes which consist of clusters and/or bunches of well developed grapes of one variety, except when designated as assorted varieties, which are at least fairly well colored, uniform in appearance when so specified in connection with the grade, and which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements for berries: ( 1 ) Mature;
( 2 ) Firm;
( 3 ) Firmly attached to capstem;
( 4 ) Not weak;
( 5 ) Not materially shriveled at capstem;
( 6 ) Not shattered;
( 7 ) Not split or crushed;
( 8 ) Not wet.
( b ) Basic requirements for stems: Not weak, or dry and brittle.
( c ) Berries free from: ( 1 ) Decay;
( 2 ) Waterberry;
( 3 ) Sunburn.
( d ) Stems free from: ( 1 ) Mold;
( 2 ) Decay.
( e ) Berries not damaged by: Any other cause.
( f ) Bunches not damaged by: ( 1 ) Shot berries;
( 2 ) Dried berries;
( 3 ) Other defective berries;
( 4 ) Any other cause.
( g ) Stems not damaged by: ( 1 ) Freezing;
( 2 ) Any other cause.
( h ) Size: ( 1 ) For berries: Exclusive of shot berries and dried berries, 75 percent, by count, of the berries on each bunch shall have the minimum diameters indicated for varieties as follows: ( i ) Thompson Seedless, Perlette, Delight, Beauty Seedless, Sugraone, Flame Seedless and other seedless varieties nine-sixteenths of an inch.
( ii ) Other varieties ten-sixteenths of an inch.
( 2 ) For clusters/bunches: In this grade grapes shall consist of at least a two berry cluster ranging to clusters and/or bunches of grapes not greater than five ounces in weight. See section 51.913.
( i ) For tolerances see section 51.886.
[61 FR 11126, Mar. 19, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 14576, Mar. 26, 1999]
Amendment No. 2 to Facility Agreement



 Exhibit 10.41(c) 
  

			
	

	  	



  

	To:	The Finance Parties, as defined in the below-mentioned Facility Agreement 

 December 13, 2007 
 Dear Sir: 
 Request for Amendment No. 2 
 We refer to the senior facility agreement dated 30 March 2007 (the “Facility
Agreement”) between, among others, Spansion Japan Limited and GE Capital Leasing Corporation as Administrative Agent and its subsequent amendment dated 1 August 2007. 
 Capitalized terms used in this letter, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the meaning given to them in the Facility Agreement. 
 The Borrower hereby requests that Clause 3.1(c) be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following provision: 
  

	 	“(c)	refinancing all Refinancing Financial Indebtedness of the Borrower to third parties and financing the acquisition of any equipment and tools installed to SP1, other than the
Manufacturing Equipment and those equipment and tools financed under Clause 3.1(b), in an amount no greater than the aggregate of the funding amount as indicated in Schedule 7 (Refinancing Financial Indebtedness Repayment Amount).”


 Also, the Borrower hereby requests that Clause 5.3(b)(ii) be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following provision: 

 

	 	“(ii)	in relation to each other Loan, an amount equal to the aggregate amount of the relevant Utilization Funding Amount and the total of the funding amounts as indicated in
Schedule 7 (Refinancing Financial Indebtedness Repayment Amount) in respect of the equipment and tools which have been purchased by the Borrower and for which financing has not been provided by the Lenders pursuant to this Clause.”


 We hereby request confirmation of the Lenders’ consent to the above amendments by your countersignature and return of the enclosed copy
of this letter. 
 The provisions of the Facility Agreement and the other Finance Documents shall, save as amended by this letter, continue in full force and
effect. 
 This letter shall be governed by and controlled in accordance with Japanese law.