alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000758256
<NAME>                        The Saint James Company
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1
<CURRENCY>                                        U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                              1
<CASH>                                                       0
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             0
<PP&E>                                                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      837
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                               999,057
<OTHER-SE>                                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 0
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             0
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (837)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

PHILLIP MALCOLM,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-440-AW-GRJ

WILLIAM BARR, et al.,

Respondents.

_______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

I have considered the magistrate judge’s September 21, 2020, Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 6. No objections have been filed.1 This case originated 

with a “Petition for a Motion to Hear and Rule” that related to Petitioner’s request 

for § 2241 relief. Petitioner has another case seeking relief, and that case is ongoing. 

See Case No. 4:19-cv-392. I therefore agree with the magistrate judge that this 

case—to the extent it was even intended to be a separate case—should be dismissed 

without prejudice. The other case will continue. The clerk will enter a judgment that 

says, “This case is dismissed without prejudice.” The clerk will then close the file. 

SO ORDERED on October 21, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

 

1 The Report and Recommendation was mailed to Petitioner and returned 

because he is no longer in the Louisiana facility. Petitioner was obligated to keep the 

court apprised of his current address.

Case 4:20-cv-00440-AW-MAF Document 9 Filed 10/21/20 Page 1 of 1
52.232-15 Progress Payments Not Included.       As prescribed in 32.502-3(c), insert the following provision in invitations for bids if the solicitation will not contain one of the provisions prescribed in 32.502-3(a) and (b):          Progress Payments Not Included (Apr 1984)          A progress payments clause is not included in this solicitation, and will not be added to the resulting contract at the time of award. Bids conditioned upon inclusion of a progress payment clause in the resulting contract will be rejected as nonresponsive.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.232 [Reserved]
52.204-17 Ownership or Control of Offeror.

As prescribed in 4.1804(b), use the following provision:

Ownership or Control of Offeror (Aug 2020)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision–

Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code means–

(1) An identifier assigned to entities located in the United States or its outlying areas by the Defense

Logistics Agency (DLA) Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Branch to identify a commercial

or government entity by unique location; or

(2) An identifier assigned by a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) or by the

NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA) to entities located outside the United States and its

outlying areas that the DLA Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Branch records and

maintains in the CAGE master file. This type of code is known as a NATO CAGE (NCAGE) code.

Highest-level owner means the entity that owns or controls an immediate owner of the offeror, or

that owns or controls one or more entities that control an immediate owner of the offeror. No entity

owns or exercises control of the highest level owner.

Immediate owner means an entity, other than the offeror, that has direct control of the offeror.

Indicators of control include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following: ownership or

interlocking management, identity of interests among family members, shared facilities and

equipment, and the common use of employees.

(b) The Offeror represents that it □ has or □ does not have an immediate owner. If the Offeror has

more than one immediate owner (such as a joint venture), then the Offeror shall respond to

paragraph (c) and if applicable, paragraph (d) of this provision for each participant in the joint

venture.

(c) If the Offeror indicates "has" in paragraph (b) of this provision, enter the following information:

Immediate owner CAGE code: ____________

Immediate owner legal name: ____________

(Do not use a "doing business as" name)

Is the immediate owner owned or controlled by another entity?: □ Yes or □ No.

(d) If the Offeror indicates "yes" in paragraph (c) of this provision, indicating that the immediate

owner is owned or controlled by another entity, then enter the following information:

Highest-level owner CAGE code: ____________

Highest-level owner legal name: ____________

(Do not use a "doing business as" name)
(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.204 [Reserved]
§ 5001.513 Interest rate changes. ( a ) *Interest rate freezes.* The guaranteed loan interest rate will freeze at the earliest uncured default date and will remain unchanged until the cancellation of the loan note guarantee in compliance with § 5001.524.
( b ) *Reductions.* The borrower, lender, and holder (if any) may collectively initiate a permanent or temporary reduction in the interest rate of the guaranteed loan at any time during the life of the loan upon written agreement among these parties. After a permanent reduction, the loan note guarantee will only cover losses of interest at the reduced interest rate. ( 1 ) When the Agency is a holder, the lender must obtain Agency approval before implementing the reduction. The lender must provide a copy of the modification agreement to the Agency for approval. The Agency will approve the reduction only when it is demonstrated that the change is more viable than liquidation and that the government's financial interests are not adversely affected.
( 2 ) Factors that the Agency will consider in determining whether to approve the change are the Government's cost of borrowing money; the monetary recovery is greater than the liquidation recovery; and the project's continued viability as demonstrated by a financial feasibility analysis.
( c ) *Increases.* Unless a temporary interest rate reduction occurred, increases in fixed interest rates and increases in variable interest rate structure are prohibited.
( d ) *Fixed rate to variable rate change.* Fixed rates can be changed to variable rates to reduce the borrower's interest rate only when the variable rate has a ceiling that is less than or equal to the original fixed rate.
( e ) *Variable rate to fixed rate change.* Variable rates can be changed to a fixed rate at the request of the borrower, agreement of the holder, if any, and Agency concurrence.
( f ) *After adjustments.* The interest rates, after adjustments, must comply with the requirements for interest rates on new loans as established by paragraph § 5001.401.
( g ) *Documentation.* The lender is responsible for the legal documentation of interest rate changes by an endorsement or any other legally effective amendment to the promissory note; however, no new promissory notes can be issued. The lender must provide copies of all such documents to the Agency within 10 calendar days of the change.
(3) In a final loss settlement when qualifying interest rate changes are made in compliance with this part, the lender must calculate interest based on the periods the given rates were in effect. The lender must maintain records that adequately document the accrued interest claimed, which must be determined in accordance with § 5001.450(c). [85 FR 42518, July 14, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 70358, Dec. 10, 2021]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of The Saint James Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Bruce
Cosgrove,  President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.




                                         /s/ Bruce Cosgrove
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Bruce Cosgrove, President, Chief
                                         Executive Officer & Chief Financial
                                         Officer

Dated: January __, 2008
# L_2014301EN.01003301.xml

| 21.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 301/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 301/33

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2014/728/CFSP

of 20 October 2014

amending Decision 2010/638/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 25 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/638/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 25 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/638/CFSP (1).

| (2) | On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/638/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be extended until 27 October 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/638/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be extended until 27 October 2015.

| (3) | Decision 2010/638/CFSP should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2010/638/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 2010/638/CFSP is amended as follows:

| | In Article 8, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:


  ‘2.   This Decision shall apply until 27 October 2015. It shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed or amended, as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’

  . |
| --- | --- |

In Article 8, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:

‘2.   This Decision shall apply until 27 October 2015. It shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed or amended, as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 20 October 2014.

For the Council

The President

C. ASHTON

---

(1)  Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP of 25 October 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea (OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p. 10).

1

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ELAINE D. HARPER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:03cv347-RH/WCS

ALBERTO GONZALEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s second report and

recommendation (document 62), and the objections thereto (document 64). I have

reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The second report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the

opinion of the court. Defendant's motion to dismiss or for summary judgment

(document 43) is GRANTED. The clerk shall enter judgment stating, “This action

is DISMISSED.” The clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED this 28th day of August, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:03-cv-00347-RH-WCS Document 65 Filed 08/28/05 Page 1 of 1
#### TRANSCAPITAL LEASING ASSOCIATES 1990-II, LP; International Bancshares Corp., IBC Financial Services, Inc., a Texas Corporation, and its Subsidiaries; IBS Subsidiary Corp., a Delaware Corporation; Inter*267national Bank of Commerce, a Texas Banking Corporation; a Texas Corporation, a Partner Other than the Tax Matters Partner Formerly Known as Bancor Development Company of Laredo, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-50682.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 23, 2007.

William Reeder Cousins, III, Michael Todd Welty, Meadows, Collier, Reed, Cousins *&*Blau, Dallas, TX, Renee Forinash McElhaney, Arthur A. Perez, Matthew S. Parkin, Cox, Smith & Matthews, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Kenneth L. Greene, Richard Thane Morrison, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Francesca Ugolini Tamami, U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division Appellate Section, Gilbert S. Rothenberg, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The court has considered appellants’ position in light of the briefs, the oral argument, and pertinent portions of the record. We find no reversible error of fact or law and affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court. Because the transaction lacked a genuine business purpose and was economically insubstantial, it is unnecessary for us to adopt either variant of the sham-transaction doctrine currently used by the courts of appeals. *See Compaq Computer Corp. & Subsidiaries v. Comm’r,*277 F.3d 778, 781-82 (5th Cir. 2001) (noting the competing variants outlined in *Rice’s Toyota World, Inc. v. Comm’r,*752 F.2d 89 (4th Cir.1985), and *ACM P’Ship v. Comm’r,*157 F.3d 231 (3d Cir.1998)). We also express no opinion on the ancillary question whether the business-purpose analysis of an alleged sham transaction that is a § 6221 partnership tax matter focuses on the subjective motivation of the taxpayer partner or the flow-through partnership entity. *See*26 U.S.C. § 6221.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 3:20-cr-40-MCR

ROY HAYES

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. 

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Count One of the superseding 

indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning 

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined the guilty plea was knowing 

and voluntary and the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact 

containing each of the essential elements thereof. I therefore recommend the plea 

of guilty be accepted and the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence 

imposed accordingly.

Dated: February 24, 2021.

/s/ Hope Thai Cannon HOPE THAI CANNON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00040-MCR Document 236 Filed 02/24/21 Page 1 of 2
3:20-cr-40-MCR

Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed 

within twenty-four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different 

deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use 

only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the 

magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a magistrate 

judge's findings or recommendations contained in a report and 

recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 

waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on 

unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir. Rule 

3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Case 3:20-cr-00040-MCR Document 236 Filed 02/24/21 Page 2 of 2
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 1 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 2 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 3 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 4 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 5 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 6 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 7 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 8 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 9 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 10 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 11 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 12 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 13 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 14 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 15 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 16 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 17 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 18 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 19 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 20 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 21 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 22 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 23 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 24 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 25 of 26
Case 5:20-cv-00321-TKW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 26 of 26
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certificate Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
of the Principal Financial Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Transforma Acquisition Group Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Jon LambertName:
    
    Jon LambertTitle:
    
    Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of the Secretary

In accordance with section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

On the basis of the best information currently available to the Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Republic of Iraq is not included in this list, but its status with respect to future lists remains under review by the Department of the Treasury.

Dated: November 23, 2010.

Manal Corwin,

International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).

[FR Doc. 2010-30026 Filed 11-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-25-M