alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
46.301 Contractor inspection requirements.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.246-1, Contractor Inspection Requirements, in

solicitations and contracts for supplies or services when the contract amount is expected to be at or

below the simplified acquisition threshold and (a) inclusion of the clause is necessary to ensure an

explicit understanding of the contractor’s inspection responsibilities, or (b) inclusion of the clause is

required under agency procedures. The clause shall not be used if the contracting officer has made

the determination specified in 46.202-2(b).

Parent topic: Subpart 46.3 - Contract Clauses
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 3:20cr40-TKW/MAF

 3:22cv8280-TKW/MAF

DEMONTE EASLEY

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to and at the direction of the Court, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant, DEMONTE EASLEY’S

Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody, 

ECF No. 550, is DISMISSED without prejudice.

July 18, 2022 JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

DATE CLERK OF COURT

s/ Paula Cawby

Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2514 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2514

          To reduce temporarily the duty on Bronate Advanced.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2006

   Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To reduce temporarily the duty on Bronate Advanced.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRONATE ADVANCED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.10.55      Formulations of     2.8%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         2,6-dibromo-4-                                                     31/2009
                         cyanophenyl
                         octanoate (CAS
                         No. 1689-99-2),
                         2, 6-dibromo-4-
                         cyanophenyl
                         heptanoate (CAS
                         No. 56634-95-8),
                         and 2-ethylhexyl
                         (4-chloro-2-
                         methylphenoxy)ace
                         tate (CAS No.
                         29450-45-1)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3808.30.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 23

- 00244

- CV
I N THE ESTATE OF Jerry D. MOTON
From the Probate Court No. 2 , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009PC3816 Honorable Veronica Vasquez , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 28, 2023
DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION On April 5, 2023, the reporter’s record was filed. On April 14, 2023, the clerk’s record was filed. Accordingly, the appe llant’s brief was due on May 15, 2023. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). On May 18, 2023, when neither the appellant’s brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed, we ordered appellant, on or before May 30, 2023, to file her appellant’s brief and a respo nse reasonably explaining (1) her failure to timely file her appellant’s brief and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’ s failure to timely file a brief. We explained that if appellant failed to file a brief and the written response b y the date ordered, we would dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8( a).04

- 23

- 00244

- CV

- 2

- Appellant has not file d an appellant’s brief or a written response. We therefore dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See id . The motion to dis miss filed by appellee on April 26, 2023
is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM
PRIVATE LAW 107–4—OCT. 4, 2002

Private Law 107–4

107th Congress

An Act

For the relief of Eugene Makuch.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT.

In consideration of the fact that Eugene Makuch—

(1) served as a foreign counterintelligence agent and dedicated his life to assist the Federal Bureau of Investigation

in its efforts at the height of the Cold War to combat communism, the Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti (KGB),

and the Soviet Union, and

(2) has not received employment assistance or health, social

security, or pension benefits, despite assurances that he would

receive such benefits upon his retirement,

the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of funds not otherwise

appropriated, the sum of $1,000,000 to Eugene Makuch of East

Amherst, New York, in compensation for the lifetime aggregate

value of benefits earned but not received by Eugene Makuch.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM.

The sum paid under section 1 shall be in full satisfaction

of any claims that Eugene Makuch may have against the United

States arising out of his service for the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY FEES.

Not more than 10 percent of the sum paid under section 1

shall be paid to or received by any agent or attorney for services

rendered in connection with the recovery of such sum. Any person

who violates this section shall be fined under title 18, United

States Code.

Oct. 4, 2002

[H.R. 487]
#### § 56.15 Political activity.

Federal graders may participate in certain political activities, including management of and participation in political campaigns, in accordance with AMS policy. Graders are subject to these rules while they are on leave with or without pay, including furlough; however the rules do not apply to cooperative employees not under Federal supervision and intermittent employees on the days they perform no service. Willful violations of the political activity rules will constitute grounds for removal from the AMS.

[71 FR 42008, July 24, 2006]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                ------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Secion 1330, as adopted
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:


(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of FNB Banking Company (the "Company")
         for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
         complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1945; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



Dated:  August 13, 2002                   /s/ Charles Copeland
                                        ---------------------------
                                         John Charles Copeland
                                         Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  August 13, 2002                   /s/ Mark A. Flowers
                                        ---------------------------
                                         Mark A. Flowers
                                         Sr. Vice President and Cashier
§ 51.2114 Tolerances for size. ( a ) When a range is specified as, for example, “ 18 ⁄ 20,” no tolerance for counts above or below the range shall be allowed.
( b ) When the minimum, or minimum and maximum diameter are specified, a total tolerance of not more than 10 percent, by weight, may fail to meet the specified size requirements: Provided, that not more than one-half of this amount, or 5 percent, may be below the minimum size specified.
52.214-35 Submission of Offers in U.S. Currency.       As prescribed in 14.201-6(x), insert the following provision:          Submission of Offers in U.S. Currency (Apr 1991)          Offers submitted in response to this solicitation shall be in terms of U.S. dollars. Offers received in other than U.S. dollars shall be rejected.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.214 [Reserved]
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30172

TOGA SOCIETY INC, doing business as Krewe of Aladdin

Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant

v.

NEWELL NORMAND, Jefferson Parish Sheriff; JEFFERSON PARISH

Defendants - Appellants-Cross-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Louisiana, New Orleans

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 6, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
[No. 8915.

Department One.

December 12, 1910.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kanda Risaburo, Appellant.1

*Dewdness*— Living with Prostitute — Sex of Accused — Evidence —Sufficiency. In a prosecution of a male person for living with and accepting the earnings of a prostitute, the objection that there was no evidence that he was a male person is without merit, where he appeared before the jury, responded to masculine pronouns addressed to him, and his sex was not made an issue. .

Same — Accepting Earnings — Evidence—Sufficiency. A conviction of living with and accepting the earnings of a prostitute, is supported by evidence of confessions and admissions, and the fact that the accused had lived for years with the same prostitute without other visible means of support.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Walla Walla county, Brents, J., entered January 24, 1910, upon a trial and conviction of living with and accepting the earnings of a common prostitute.

Affirmed.

*E. C. Dailey,*for appellant.

*Everett J. Smith,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 112 Pac. 85.

Rudkin, C. J.

This is an appeal from the judgment and sentence of the court below,- convicting the appellant of the crime of living with and accepting the earnings of a common prostitute. Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict is the only error assigned. The appellant first contends that there is no evidence in the record tending to show that he is a male person, and secondly, that there is no sufficient *163evidence that he accepted the earnings of the prostitute in question, whose character and calling are admitted. These assignments are wholly without merit. Conceding that it was incumbent on the state to prove that the appellant was a male person, and that there is no direct evidence in the record to that effect, the fact remains that the appellant appeared before the jury, and responded repeatedly to masculine pronouns addressed to him during the trial, without objection or protest. Any bystander might have téstified that the appellant was a male person from his appearance only, and the jury might properly draw, the same inference. The sex of the appellant was not made an issue during the trial, but was accepted by all parties concerned as a conceded fact, and under such circumstances the question will not receive serious consideration here. *Lewis v. People,*37 Mich. 517.

It is next contended that there is no evidence tending to show that the appellant accepted any earnings of the prostitute ; but if confessions and admissions go for. aught in a court of justice, there is ample testimony on that point also. Aside from this, there was abundant evidence that the appellant has lived with this same prostitute for a number of years, at different points, and has no other visible means of support.

The judgment is affirmed;

Fullerton, Gose, Mount, and Parker, JJ., concur.
#### § 58.813 Dry whey.

The quality requirements for dry whey shall be in accordance with the U.S. Standards for Dry Whey.
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                              
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                   
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002            

I, Lubow Klauser, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Columbus Ventures Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        

| | By:    | /s/
      Lubow Klauser    
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | LUBOW KLAUSER              
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | January 15, 2008           

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Editorial Note on Part 3403
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3403 appear at 76 FR 4807, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3403.6 Content of proposals. ( a ) The proposed research must be responsive to one of the USDA program interests stated in the research topic descriptions of the program solicitation.
( b ) Proposals must cover only scientific/technological research activities. A small business concern must not propose product development, technical assistance, demonstration projects, classified research, or patent applications. Many of the research projects supported by the SBIR program lead to the development of new products based upon the research results obtained during the project. However, projects that seek funding solely for product development where no research is involved, *i.e.*, funds are needed to permit the development of a project based on previously completed research, will not be accepted. Literature surveys should be conducted prior to preparing proposals for submission and must not be proposed as a part of the SBIR Phase I or Phase II effort. Proposals principally for the development of proven concepts toward commercialization or for market research should not be submitted since such efforts are considered the responsibility of the private sector and therefore are not supported by USDA.
( c ) A proposal must be limited to only one topic. The same proposal may not be submitted under more than one topic as defined in the solicitation. However, an organization may submit separate proposals on the same topic. Where similar research is discussed under more than one topic, the proposer should choose that topic whose description appears most relevant to the proposer's research concept. USDA will not consider funding duplicate (essentially equivalent work) proposals. In addition, essentially equivalent work funded by another entity will be returned to the applicant without review.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Mogielnicki, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 29, 1969 and June 19, 1969, respectively, the former denying the application without a hearing and the latter granting reargument but adhering to the original decision. Appeal from the order dated April 29, 1969, dismissed as academic; that order was superseded by the order of June 19, 1969. Appeal from so much of the order of June 19, 1969 as granted reargument dismissed; appellant is not aggrieved by that part of the order. Order of June 19, 1969 otherwise affirmed. In our opinion the documentary evidence in the record and defendant’s plea of guilty demonstrate that no factual issue was presented as to the death of the victim of the crime. Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ-., concur; (Beldock, P. J., deceased).
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                               THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Pioneer  Railcorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  we, Guy L.Brenkman,
Chief Executive Officer, and J. Michael Carr,  President,  Treasurer,  and Chief
Financial Officer,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/  Gary L. Brenkman                     /s/  J. Michael Carr
-----------------------------             -------------------------------------
Guy L. Brenkman                           J. Michael Carr
Chief Executive Officer                   President and Chief Financial Officer

March 21, 2005
NDFL Prob 35 Report and Order Terminating Probation/
(1/92) Supervised Release
Prior to Original Expiration Date

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Northern District of Florida

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Vv Crim. No. 1:97CR33-001
Kenneth McQueen.
On November 9, 2009, the above named was placed on Supervised Release for a period of
ten years. Due to his medical condition, he is incapable of complying with the rules and regulations

of Supervised Release and is no longer in need of Supervised Release. It is accordingly
recommended that Kenneth McQueen be discharged from Supervised Release.

Respectfully submitted,

MEE

fan Ef. Meinnes
Senior U.S. Probation Officer

ORDER OF THE COURT

Pursuant to the above report, it is ordered that the defendant is discharged from Supervised
Release and that the proceedings in the case be terminated.

Date this Lot day of Soverhec 20 OF.

Maurice M. Paul
Senior Wnited States District Judge

Rec'd] 1S0POSUsTCF Ind angg19
52.227-4 Patent Indemnity-Construction

Contracts.

As prescribed in 27.201-2(d)(1), insert the following clause:

Patent Indemnity-Construction Contracts (Dec 2007)

Except as otherwise provided, the Contractor shall indemnify the Government and its officers,

agents, and employees against liability, including costs and expenses, for infringement of any United

States patent (except a patent issued upon an application that is now or may hereafter be withheld

from issue pursuant to a Secrecy Order under ( 35 U.S.C. 181) arising out of performing this

contract or out of the use or disposal by or for the account of the Government of supplies furnished

or work performed under this contract.

(End of clause)

Alternate I (Dec 2007). As prescribed in 27.201-2 (d)(2), designate the first paragraph of the basic

clause as paragraph (a) and add the following paragraph (b) to the basic clause:

(b) This patent indemnification shall not apply to the following items:

__________________________________________________ [Contracting Officer list the items to be excluded.]

Parent topic: 52.227 [Reserved]
52.100 Scope of subpart.       This subpart-                                       (a) 						            Gives instructions for using part  52, including the explanation and use of provision and clause numbers, prescriptions, prefaces, and the matrix;                                          (b) 						            Prescribes procedures for incorporating, identifying, and modifying provisions and clauses in solicitations and contracts, and for using alternates; and                                          (c) 						            Describes the derivation of FAR provisions and clauses.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 52.1 - Instructions for Using Provisions and Clauses