alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 231 (Thursday, December 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30293]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs

[OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1535]


License Plate Reader Standard Special Technical Committee Request 
for Proposals for Certification and Testing Expertise

AGENCY: National Institute of Justice.

ACTION: Request for Proposals for Certification and Testing Expertise.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) is in the process of 
developing a new License Plate Reader Standard and corresponding 
certification program requirements. This work is being performed by a 
Special Technical Committee (STC), comprised of practitioners from the 
field, researchers, testing experts, certification experts, and 
representatives from stakeholder organizations. It is anticipated that 
the STC members will participate in six 2-day meetings over a 12-month 
time period with the goal of completing development of the standard and 
certification program requirements. It is anticipated that STC meetings 
will begin in January 2011. Travel expenses and per diem will be 
reimbursed for all STC meetings; however, participation time will not 
be funded. NIJ is seeking representatives from (1) certification bodies 
and (2) test laboratories with experience in programs for similar types 
of electronic equipment. Additional preferred knowledge includes 
experience with video systems or experience with law enforcement 
operations. There are up to four positions to be filled on the STC, and 
NIJ will accept the first 20 submissions for review.
    Interested parties are requested to nominate individuals from their 
organizations and submit no more than two pages describing the 
nominee's applicable experience, preferred knowledge, and affiliations 
with standards development organizations. This information shall be 
submitted to Frances Scott at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0a6b2a1aea3a5b3eeb3a3afb4b480b5b3a4afaaeea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f59387949b969086db86969a8181b58086919a9fdb929a83">[email protected]</span></a> by December 13, 
2010. The submissions will be reviewed, and participants will be 
notified regarding their acceptance by January 17, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frances Scott by telephone at 202-305-
9950 [Note: this is not a toll-free telephone number], or by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dbbda9bab5b8bea8f5a8b8b4afaf9baea8bfb4b1f5bcb4ad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="187e6a79767b7d6b366b7b776c6c586d6b7c7772367f776e">[email protected]</span></a>.

John H. Laub,
Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2010-30293 Filed 12-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Sarah Catania, Appellant, v 1401 Kearney Ave. Corp., Defendant, and Christopher Cococcia, Respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered August 29,1979, which granted the motion of defendant Cococcia for summary judgment and denied plaintiffs cross motion for the same relief, in this declaratory judgment action, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of further declaring that the lease between plaintiff and defendant 1401 Kearney Ave. Corp. is valid, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent. We adopt the rationale expressed by Special Term in finding and concluding that the lease at issue is valid. However, while Special Term in the judgment appropriately did not direct mere dismissal of the complaint, the judgment failed to specifically declare the rights of the parties in respect of the dispute invoked, and we modify so as to declare in favor of the defendant-intervenor Christopher Cococcia. Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Markewich, Lupiano and Carro, JJ.
# L_2016096DE.01005001.xml

| 12.4.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 96/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 96/50

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses 2014/179/EU der Europäischen Zentralbank vom 22. Januar 2014 zur Änderung des Beschlusses EZB/2004/2 zur Verabschiedung der Geschäftsordnung der Europäischen Zentralbank (EZB/2014/1)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 95 vom 29. März 2014
  )

Auf Seite 61 erhält Artikel 1 Nummer 8 folgende Fassung:

| „8. | Artikel 17.5 erhält folgende Fassung:

  ‚17.5.   Unbeschadet der Bestimmungen von Artikel 43 Absatz 2 und Artikel 46.1 erster Gedankenstrich der Satzung werden Stellungnahmen der EZB vom EZB-Rat verabschiedet. Unter außergewöhnlichen Umständen und sofern sich nicht mindestens drei Zentralbankpräsidenten dafür aussprechen, die Zuständigkeit für die Verabschiedung bestimmter Stellungnahmen beim EZB-Rat zu belassen, können Stellungnahmen der EZB jedoch vom Direktorium verabschiedet werden, und zwar nach Maßgabe der Anmerkungen des EZB-Rates und unter Beachtung der Mitwirkungsrechte des Erweiterten Rates. Das Direktorium ist befugt, die endgültige Fassung von Stellungnahmen der EZB zu besonders technischen Fragen zu erstellen sowie faktische Änderungen oder Berichtigungen aufzunehmen. Stellungnahmen der EZB werden vom Präsidenten unterzeichnet. Bei Stellungnahmen der EZB, die hinsichtlich der Aufsicht über die Kreditinstitute verabschiedet werden sollen, kann der EZB-Rat das Aufsichtsgremium konsultieren.‘“ |
| --- | --- |

„8.

‚17.5.   Unbeschadet der Bestimmungen von Artikel 43 Absatz 2 und Artikel 46.1 erster Gedankenstrich der Satzung werden Stellungnahmen der EZB vom EZB-Rat verabschiedet. Unter außergewöhnlichen Umständen und sofern sich nicht mindestens drei Zentralbankpräsidenten dafür aussprechen, die Zuständigkeit für die Verabschiedung bestimmter Stellungnahmen beim EZB-Rat zu belassen, können Stellungnahmen der EZB jedoch vom Direktorium verabschiedet werden, und zwar nach Maßgabe der Anmerkungen des EZB-Rates und unter Beachtung der Mitwirkungsrechte des Erweiterten Rates. Das Direktorium ist befugt, die endgültige Fassung von Stellungnahmen der EZB zu besonders technischen Fragen zu erstellen sowie faktische Änderungen oder Berichtigungen aufzunehmen. Stellungnahmen der EZB werden vom Präsidenten unterzeichnet. Bei Stellungnahmen der EZB, die hinsichtlich der Aufsicht über die Kreditinstitute verabschiedet werden sollen, kann der EZB-Rat das Aufsichtsgremium konsultieren.‘“

---
| `1
**National Center    for     Health Statistics            Division of Data     Services            6525 Belcrest Road     Hyattsville, MD     20782-2003     (301)458-4636      **

 

**Statistical Export and Tabulation System****NCHS Home | SETS Home | Interface | Designer Kit | Download Rev 805    What's New | Available Data | Ordering    Instructions |****Search NCHS | Contact us**
**Using the SETSInterface**

The    SETS Interface is a program used to access **SETS data      products**. Users    can browse and search documents and data, create subsets, tabulate, chart,    and export to a variety of formats.  

**Basic      Instructions for Using the SETS Interface:********Installing      SETS from a CD-ROM****Opening      Programs and Files in SETS 2.0 ****Browsing      and Searching Documents****Making      Tables****Selecting      Records****Recoding      Fields****Making      Charts****Exporting      and Extracting Data****On-Line      Help**

 

**NCHS Home | SETS Home | Interface | Designer Kit | Download Rev 805    What's New | Available Data | Ordering    Instructions |****Search NCHS | Contact us**
**CDC Home | Search    | Health Topics A-Z**
This page last reviewed July 10,2000

**U.S.    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES****Centers    for Disease Control and Prevention**    National Center for Health Statistics    Division of Data Services     Hyattsville, MD    20782-2003    (301) 458-4636 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 58.425 Conveyor for moving and draining block or barrel cheese.

The conveyor shall be constructed so that it will not contaminate the cheese and be easily cleaned. It shall be installed so that the press drippings will not cause an environmental problem.
§ 632.20 Application for assistance. ( a ) Land users must submit an application for program assistance through the local conservation district or NRCS field office. NRCS is to announce dates for receiving applications through local media. Applications are to be reviewed by the conservation district and/or local reclamation committee, which is to verify eligibility and recommend funding priorities to the NRCS district conservationist. The NRCS district conservationist is to assign funding priorities according to the recommendations unless he determines that applications are incomplete, ineligible, or unfeasible. Low priority applications that cannot be serviced within specific time periods established by the State conservationist are to be returned to the applicant with an appropriate explanation. These applicants may reapply at a later date if they are still interested.
( b ) Eligible applicants are serviced within each subpriority according to the following criteria: ( 1 ) The specific type, amount, and relative importance of benefits to be derived. (Public benefits and offsite environmental improvement will take precedence over onsite benefits.)
( 2 ) Feasibility and practicability of reclaiming for the proposed uses.
( 3 ) Land user's ability to proceed.
( 4 ) Date of the application.
162 So.2d 11

#### Erwin R. DAVIS v. O. C. ROBERTS, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, L. L. James, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.

No. 47149.

March 31, 1964.

In re: O. C. Roberts and Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of West Feliciana. 159 So.2d 511.

The application is denied. According to the facts of the case as found to be by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
52.234-4 Earned Value Management System.

As prescribed in 34.203(c), insert the following clause:

Earned Value Management System (Nov 2016)

(a) The Contractor shall use an earned value management system (EVMS) that has been determined

by the Cognizant Federal Agency (CFA) to be compliant with the guidelines in Electronic Industries

Alliance Standard 748 (EIA-748) (current version at the time of award) to manage this contract. If

the Contractor’s current EVMS has not been determined compliant at the time of award, see

paragraph (b) of this clause. The Contractor shall submit reports in accordance with the

requirements of this contract.

(b) If, at the time of award, the Contractor’s EVM System has not been determined by the CFA as

complying with EVMS guidelines or the Contractor does not have an existing cost/schedule control

system that is compliant with the guidelines in EIA- 748 (current version at time of award), the

Contractor shall-

(1) Apply the current system to the contract; and

(2) Take necessary actions to meet the milestones in the Contractor’s EVMS plan approved by the

Contracting Officer.

(c) The Government will conduct an Integrated Baseline Review (IBR). If a pre-award IBR has not

been conducted, a post award IBR shall be conducted as early as practicable after contract award.

(d) The Contracting Officer may require an IBR at-

(1) Exercise of significant options; or

(2) Incorporation of major modifications.

(e) Unless a waiver is granted by the CFA, Contractor proposed EVMS changes require approval of

the CFA prior to implementation. The CFA will advise the Contractor of the acceptability of such

changes within 30 calendar days after receipt of the notice of proposed changes from the

Contractor. If the advance approval requirements are waived by the CFA, the Contractor shall

disclose EVMS changes to the CFA at least 14 calendar days prior to the effective date of

implementation.

(f) The Contractor shall provide access to all pertinent records and data requested by the

Contracting Officer or a an authorized representative as necessary to permit Government

surveillance to ensure that the EVMS conforms, and continues to conform, with the performance

criteria referenced in paragraph (a) of this clause.

(g) The Contractor shall require the subcontractors specified below to comply with the requirements

of this clause: [Insert list of applicable subcontractors.]

________________________________________________

________________________________________________
________________________________________________

________________________________________________

(End of clause)

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.234 [Reserved]
52.227-23 Rights to Proposal Data

(Technical).

As prescribed in 27.409(l), insert the following clause:

Rights to Proposal Data (Technical) (June 1987)

Except for data contained on pages _____, it is agreed that as a condition of award of this contract,

and notwithstanding the conditions of any notice appearing thereon, the Government shall have

unlimited rights (as defined in the "Rights in Data-General" clause contained in this contract) in and

to the technical data contained in the proposal dated ____________, upon which this contract is based.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.227 [Reserved]
##### 



Exhibit 31.4
 Certificate Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
of the Principal Financial Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 of Transforma Acquisition
Group Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 2, 2007
    
    /s/ Jon Lambert

Name: Jon LambertTitle: Treasurer and Secretary(principal financial officer)
Summary of Guaranty Contract
of Maximum Amount ( the “Contract”) Entered into by and between BAK
International Limited and Shenzhen Branch, Bank of China (the “Creditor”) on
March 4th, 2009

    


    Main
contents:

    Ø Guaranty Contract number:
2009Zhenzhongyinsi Baoezi 0035;

    Ø Bak International Limited undertakes to assume
joint and several liabilities for Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the
“Obligor”)’s indebtedness towards Bank of China under the Comprehensive
Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount (reference no.:
2009Zhenzhongyin Exiezi 000024) from March 4th, 2009
to February 3rd, 2010,
and the maximum amount secured is RMB 450 million.

    Ø Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty
under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The
guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to
pay off the debt (including the creditor declares the debt becomes mature in
advance to its original expiry date due to default of the obligor or the
guarantor).

    Ø Scope of Guaranty: The guaranty shall cover
all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract
compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation
cost, lawyer’s fee, notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is
incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditor’s right.

    Ø Guaranty period: The
guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after
the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement
entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.

    


    Headlines
of the articles omitted:

    Ø     
Termination and explanation

    Ø Payment on demand

    Ø Declaration and guaranty

    Ø Independent guaranty

    Ø Fulfillment of the responsibility and giving up of
the right

    Ø Amendment of Contract

    Ø Effectiveness and Disputation
settlement

    Ø Contract period

    Ø Supplement articles
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2223 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 

equipment used for working iron or steel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2006 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

manufacturing equipment used for working iron or steel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT USED 

4 FOR WORKING IRON OR STEEL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.84.83 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain manufacturing equipment) is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•S 2223 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### Bernard W. Gimbel, Appellant, v Karen D. Reibman et al., Respondents.

— In an action, *inter alia,*to partition certain real property, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 3, 1980, which denied his motion for appointment of a temporary receiver. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. Although appointment of a temporary receiver is an extreme remedy which is not lightly granted *(Hahn v Garay,*54 AD2d 629), the plaintiff has satisfied the requirements of CPLR 6401 (subd [a]) and is entitled to such relief. There is no question that he has an apparent interest in the property, either through a 25% fee ownership or through the same percentage interest in a joint venture for the ownership and management of the property. Plaintiff also has established a danger of material injury to the property. Although we discredit his suggestion that defendants may not be collecting rent from the. property’s commercial tenant, the defendant’s concede that they have commingled that income with *898the income derived from other property or properties. Such act creates a situation ripe for dilution of the income assets and harm- to the interests of the nonparticipatory joint venturer *(Jones v Cuffee,*49 AD2d 883; *E. G. A. Successor Corp. v Vogel,*21 AD2d 176). Furthermore, the serious and uncontroverted allegation regarding the corporate defendant’s solvency, and the consequent uncertainty whether that party would be able to satisfy a judgment against it, underscore the need for a receiver to insure the property’s continued worth pending adjudication of the dispute on the merits (cf. *Cohn v Wahn,*132 App Div 849). Titone, J. P., Gibbons, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
§ 58.930 Official test methods. ( a ) *Chemical.* Chemical analysis, except where otherwise prescribed herein, shall be made in accordance with the methods described in the latest edition of Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC or by the latest edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products.
( b ) *Microbiological.* Microbiological determinations shall be made in accordance with the methods described in the latest edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products.