alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Ezra E. Ezra, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sopac Cellular
     Solutions Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
19th day of November, 2007.


/s/ Ezra E. Ezra
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
§ 70.38 Suspension or withdrawal of plant approval for correctable cause. ( a ) Any plant approval given pursuant to the regulations in this part may be suspended by the Administrator for ( 1 ) failure to maintain grading facilities and equipment in a satisfactory state of repair, sanitation, or cleanliness;
( 2 ) the use of operating procedures which are not in accordance with the regulations in this part; or
( 3 ) alterations of grading facilities or equipment which have not been approved in accordance with the regulations in this part.
( b ) Whenever it is feasible to do so, written notice in advance of a suspension shall be given to the person concerned and shall specify a reasonable period of time in which corrective action must be taken. If advance written notice is not given, the suspension action shall be promptly confirmed in writing and the reasons therefor shall be stated, except in instances where the person has already corrected the deficiency. Such service, after appropriate corrective action is taken, will be restored immediately, or as soon thereafter as a grader can be made available. During such period of suspension, grading service shall not be rendered. However, the other provisions of the regulations pertaining to providing service on a resident basis will remain in effect unless such service is terminated in accordance with the provisions of this part.
( c ) If the grading facilities or methods of operation are not brought into compliance within a reasonable period of time as specified by the Administrator, the Administrator shall initiate withdrawal action pursuant to the Rules of Practice Governing Formal Adjudicatory Proceedings and Grading Service (7 CFR part 1, subpart H), and the operator shall be afforded an opportunity for an oral hearing upon the operator's written request in accordance with such Rules of Practice, with respect to the merits or validity of the withdrawal action, but any suspension shall continue in effect pending the outcome of such hearing unless otherwise ordered by the Administrator. Upon withdrawal of grading service in an official plant, the plant approval shall also become terminated, and all labels, seals, tags, or packaging material bearing official identification shall, under the supervision of a person designated by the AMS, either be destroyed, or the official identification completely obliterated, or sealed in a manner acceptable to the AMS.
( d ) In any case where grading service is withdrawn under this § 70.38, the person concerned may thereafter apply for grading service as provided in §§ 70.30 through 70.37 of these regulations.
[41 FR 23681, June 11, 1976. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 60139, Dec. 26, 1978. Redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 71 FR 42013, July 24, 2006]
<page>
                                                            Exhibit 31.2

Certification required by Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael G. Koppel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nordstrom Credit,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: September 9, 2003                   /s/ Michael G. Koppel
      -------------------                 -----------------------------
                                          Michael G. Koppel
                                          Vice President and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of China Unitech Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Xuezheng Yuan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 26thday of September, 2008.                                                                                                               
|   

XUEZHENG YUANXuezheng YuanChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





















---
Exhibit 23.2

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form N-2 of Portman Ridge Finance Corporation (No. 333-218596) and to the use of our report dated February 26, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Portman Ridge Finance Corporation (formerly known as “KCAP Financial, Inc.”) as of December 31, 2018 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2018 included in the Form 10-K of Portman Ridge Finance Corporation.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

New York, New York

March 6, 2020
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Torres, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on October 10, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Birns, J. P., Sandler, Silverman, Bloom and Lynch, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:01cr27-SPM

FELICIA WIGGINS FLEMMING,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EARLY TERMINATION

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant Felicia Wiggins

Flemming’s motion for early termination of supervised release (doc. 25). The

Court finds that it would not be in the interests of justice to terminate Defendant’s

supervised release given the seriousness of the offense of conviction and the

leniency that has already been extended. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion for early termination of

supervised release (doc. 25) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of February, 2006.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:01-cr-00027-SPM Document 26 Filed 02/03/06 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Jim B. Terry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ JIM  B. TERRY         |              |
|---------------------------|-------------------|
| Jim B. Terry              |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| Date:                     | February 14, 2006 |
|                           |                   |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc.and will be retained by Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
52.203-8 Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal or Improper Activity.       As prescribed in 3.104-9(a), insert the following clause:          Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal or Improper Activity (May 2014)                                       (a) 						            If the Government receives information that a contractor or a person has violated 41 U.S.C.2102-2104, Restrictions on Obtaining and Disclosing Certain Information, the Government may-                                                         (1) 								                Cancel the solicitation, if the contract has not yet been awarded or issued; or                                                            (2) 								                Rescind the contract with respect to which-                                                                           (i) 										                    The Contractor or someone acting for the Contractor has been convicted for an offense where the conduct violates 41 U.S.C.2102 for the purpose of either-                                                                                             (A) 												                        Exchanging the information covered by such subsections for anything of value; or                                                                                                (B) 												                        Obtaining or giving anyone a competitive advantage in the award of a Federal agency procurement contract; or                                                                                                                                         (ii) 										                    The head of the contracting activity has determined, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the Contractor or someone acting for the Contractor has engaged in conduct punishable under 41 U.S.C.2105(a).                                                                                                                            (b) 						            If the Government rescinds the contract under paragraph (a) of this clause, the Government is entitled to recover, in addition to any penalty prescribed by law, the amount expended under the contract.                                          (c) 						            The rights and remedies of the Government specified herein are not exclusive, and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law, regulation, or under this contract.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.203 [Reserved]
NDFL Prob 35 Report and Order Terminating
(1/92) Supervised Release
Prior to Original Expiration Date

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Northern District of Florida

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Vv Dkt. No. 1:02CR37-001

DAVID WILLIAM HOGSETT

On May 9, 2007, the above named was placed on Supervised Release for a period of three
(3) years. He has complied with the rules and regulations of Supervised Release and is no longer in
need of Supervised Release. It is accordingly recommended that David William Hogsett be
discharged from Supervised Release.

Respectfully submitted,

AA 5

pat ward A. Emery
Sr. U. S. Probation ofr

ORDER OF THE COURT

Pursuant to the above report, it is ordered that the defendant is discharged from Supervised
Release and that the proceedings in the case be terminated.

Date this Dat day of (\4 , 20 OF.
GAT hide vas Coe

Mace M. Paul

Senfor United States District Judge
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Merrill
      Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.


250
      Vesey
      Street


4
      World
      Financial Center, 10th Floor


New
      York,
      New York 10080





Wilshire
      Credit Corporation


14523
      SW
      Millikan Way


Suite
      200


Beaverton,
      Oregon 97005





Attention:
      Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series 2006-SD1





Re:
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of August 1, 2006
      among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as depositor, Wilshire Credit
      Corporation, as servicer and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee,
      relating to Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed
      Certificates, Series 2006-SD1





I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 20 23

- 2530 LT Case No. 2022

- 310338

- MMDB

_____________________________ G RANT H UNTER L AMIE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Volusia County

. Judith D. Campbell , Judge

. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Zachary Wiseman, Assistant Public Defender
, Daytona Beach
, for Appellant

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General
, Tallahassee
, and Richard A. Pallas, Jr.
, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

September 13, 2024

P ER C URIAM

. We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand for a corrected judgment striking the $50 cost of investigation because it was not requested by the State or orally pronounced

. S ee Richards v. State , 288 So. 3d 574, 576 (Fla. 2020)

.2 A FFIRMED and R EMANDED with instructions

.

M AKAR , H ARRIS , and K ILBANE , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
#### Ruben E. Lajara, Appellant, v Farrell Lines Incorporated, Respondent.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered October 16, 1978, directing plaintiff to supply defendant with copies of statements of plaintiff’s cocrew members, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. While we do not consider statements by these seamen, former employees, as statements by the defendant, we think Special Term did not abuse its discretion in directing the furnishing of these statements, particularly as the witnesses involved are merchant seamen who may not be readily available. Of course, fairness requires that such discretion should also be exercised in plaintiff’s favor with respect to statements obtained by defendant, if the occasion arises. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Bloom, Silver-man and Ross, JJ.
#### § 58.935 Chocolate and cocoa.

Such products used as flavor ingredients shall meet the requirements of the Food and Drug Administration, “Definitions and Standards of Identity for Cocoa Products.”
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 679 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### § 51.2947 Method of inspection.

In determining the grade of a lot of walnuts, all of the nuts in the sample first should be graded for size and then examined for external defects. The same nuts then should be cracked and examined for internal defects. The nuts must meet the requirements for both external and internal quality in order to meet a designated grade.
51.101 Policy.       (a) 						            If it is in the Government’s interest, and if supplies or services required in the performance of a Government contract are available from Government supply sources, contracting officers may authorize contractors to use these sources in performing-                                                         (1) 								                Government cost-reimbursement contracts;                                                            (2) 								                Other types of negotiated contracts when the agency determines that a substantial dollar portion of the contractor’s contracts are of a Government cost-reimbursement nature; or                                                            (3)                         *A contract under*                         41 U.S.C.chapter 85, Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, if-                                                                           (i) 										                    The nonprofit agency requesting use of the supplies and services is providing a commodity or service to the Federal Government; and                                                                              (ii) 										                    The supplies or services received are directly used in making or providing a commodity or service, approved by the Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, to the Federal Government (see subpart  8.7).                                                                                                                            (b) 						            Contractors with fixed-price Government contracts that require protection of security classified information may acquire security equipment through GSA sources (see 41 CFR 101-26.507).                                          (c) 						            Contracting officers shall authorize contractors purchasing supply items for Government use that are available from the Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled (see subpart  8.7) to purchase such items from the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), the General Services Administration (GSA), and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) if they are available from these agencies through their distribution facilities. Mandatory supplies that are not available from DLA/GSA/VA shall be ordered through the appropriate central nonprofit agency (see 52.208-9(c)).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 51.1 - Contractor Use of Government Supply Sources
#### § 63.504 Amendments.

Amendments to this part may be proposed, from time to time, by the Board or by any interested persons affected by the provisions of the Act, including the Secretary.