alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
52.204-5 Women-Owned Business (Other

Than Small Business).

As prescribed in 4.607(a), insert the following provision:

Women-Owned Business (Other Than Small Business) (Oct 2014)

(a) Definition."Women-owned business concern," as used in this provision, means a concern that is at

least 51 percent owned by one or more women; or in the case of any publicly owned business, at

least 51 percent of its stock is owned by one or more women; and whose management and daily

business operations are controlled by one or more women.

(b) Representation. [Complete only if the offeror is a women-owned business concern and has not

represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of FAR 52.219-1, Small Business

Program Representations, of this solicitation.] The offeror represents that it □ is a women-owned

business concern.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.204 [Reserved]
Case 3:03-cr-00135-LC Document 29 Filed 04/12/05 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:03-cr-00135-LC Document 29 Filed 04/12/05 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:03-cr-00135-LC Document 29 Filed 04/12/05 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:03-cr-00135-LC Document 29 Filed 04/12/05 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:03-cr-00135-LC Document 29 Filed 04/12/05 Page 5 of 5
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 74712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR11-75-000]


American Midstream Onshore Pipelines, LLC; Notice of Petition for 
Rate Approval

November 24, 2010.
    Take notice that on November 22, 2010, American Midstream Onshore 
Pipelines, LLC (AMOP) filed a petition pursuant to section 
284.123(b)(2) of the Commission's regulations. AMOP proposes a maximum 
system-wide interruptible rate of $0.2315 per MMBtu plus actual lost 
and unaccounted for natural gas, not to exceed one-half percent.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8fefdeafbf7d6d4d1d6ddebcdc8c8d7caccf8deddcadb96dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="10565542535f7e7c797e75436560607f626450767562733e777f66">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern time on Monday, December 6, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30259 Filed 11-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Amendment to Employment Agreement, John Strzemp



 EXHIBIT 10.4 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Employment Agreement is by and between John Strzemp
(“Employee”) and Wynn Resorts, Limited (“Employer”). 
 WHEREAS, Employee and Employer have entered in to that certain Employment
Agreement dated as of August 31, 2005, as amended (the “Employment Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, due to the ongoing negative economic climate,
Employee and Employer desire to amend the Employment Agreement in order to assist Employer to maintain business stability thereby preserving Employee’s employment. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Amendment to Base Salary. Effective February 16, 2009, the term “Base Salary” shall be mean $510,000 per annum. 

  

	 	2.	Other Provisions of Agreement. The parties acknowledge that the Employment Agreement is being modified only as stated herein, and agree that nothing else in the Employment
Agreement shall be affected by this Amendment. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed as of the date below. 
  

							
	WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED	 		 	EMPLOYEE
			
	 /s/ Matt Maddox
	 		 	 /s/ John Strzemp
 John
Strzemp

				
	 By:
	 	 Matt Maddox
	 		 	 Date:  February 12, 2009

				
	 Its:
	 	 CFO & Treasurer
52.219-17 Section 8(a) Award.       As prescribed in 19.811-3(c), insert the following clause:          Section8(a) Award (Oct 2019)                                       (a) 						            By execution of a contract, the Small Business Administration (SBA) agrees to the following:                                                         (1) 								                To furnish the supplies or services set forth in the contract according to the specifications and the terms and conditions by subcontracting with the Offeror who has been determined an eligible concern pursuant to the provisions of section8(a) of the Small Business Act, as amended (15 U.S.C.637(a)).                                                            (2) 								                Except for novation agreements, delegates to the ______ [*insert name of contracting activity*]the responsibility for administering the contract with complete authority to take any action on behalf of the Government under the terms and conditions of the contract; provided, however that the contracting agency shall give advance notice to the SBA before it issues a final notice terminating the right of the subcontractor to proceed with further performance, either in whole or in part, under the contract.                                                            (3) 								                That payments to be made under the contract will be made directly to the subcontractor by the contracting activity.                                                            (4) 								                To notify the ___________ [*insert name of contracting agency*] Contracting Officer immediately upon notification by the subcontractor that the owner or owners upon whom 8(a) eligibility was based plan to relinquish ownership or control of the concern.                                                            (5) 								                That the subcontractor awarded a subcontract hereunder shall have the right of appeal from decisions of the cognizant Contracting Officer under the "Disputes" clause of the subcontract.                                                                             (b) 						            The offeror/subcontractor agrees and acknowledges that it will, for and on behalf of the SBA, fulfill and perform all of the requirements of the contract.                                           (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.219 [Reserved]
REPORT
      ON
      ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE





First
      American Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (an indirect subsidiary of The
      First American Corporation, and the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
      assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006, and for the period from January
      1,
      2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing
      criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(l)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
      (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code
      of
      Federal Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party (the "Applicable Servicing
      Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report include all loans for
      commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting Party
      served as the commercial tax service provider (the "Platform").





The
      Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
      Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party
      has
      complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
      as of
      December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
      taken as a whole.




PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
      report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
      as
      of December 31, 2006, a nd
      for
      the Reporting Period.





FIRST
      AMERICAN COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.





/s/
      S.
      Lewis Hill


S.
      Lewis
      Hill


Title:
      President


Dated:
      March 1, 2007
52.211-10 Commencement, Prosecution, and Completion of Work.       As prescribed in 11.404(b), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract is contemplated. The clause may be changed to accommodate the issuance of orders under indefinite-delivery contracts for construction.          Commencement, Prosecution, and Completion of Work (Apr 1984)          The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract within _________ [*Contracting Officer insert number*] calendar days after the date the Contractor receives the notice to proceed, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and (c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than ______________.* The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.          * The Contracting Officer shall specify either a number of days after the date the contractor receives the notice to proceed, or a calendar date.          (End of clause)          *Alternate I*                (Apr 1984). If the completion date is expressed as a specific calendar date, computed on the basis of the contractor receiving the notice to proceed by a certain day, add the following paragraph to the basic clause:             The completion date is based on the assumption that the successful offeror will receive the notice to proceed by _______________ [*Contracting Officer insert date*]. The completion date will be extended by the number of calendar days after the above date that the Contractor receives the notice to proceed, except to the extent that the delay in issuance of the notice to proceed results from the failure of the Contractor to execute the contract and give the required performance and payment bonds within the time specified in the offer.    **Parent topic:** 52.211 [Reserved]
Exhibit 10.7.2






Exhibit 10.7.2




[LETTERHEAD OF NORSKE SKOG CANADA LIMITED]




November 2, 2004




Western Forest Products Inc.

3rd Floor, 435 Trunk Road

Duncan, British Columbia

V9L 2P9




	 	 	 
	Attention:

	 	Mr. John Dalton
	 

	 	General Manager, Log Supply






Dear John:



Supply Arrangements for Chips, Sawdust, Hog Fuel and Sawlogs




Thank you for your letter of August 17, 2004.



In order to complete our records we would like to confirm that Western Forest Products Inc. is the
“Lumberco” referred to in the Plan of Compromise and Arrangement for the Doman companies.



We would also like to confirm that Western Forest Products Inc. has accordingly effective July 28,
2004 (as the effective date under the plan) assumed the obligations of Doman Industries Limited
and/or Doman Forest Products Limited arising after that date under the following fibre supply
agreements, all as amended up to and including July 28, 2004 (including the amendments documented
in our letters of December 2, 2002 and February 11, 2003):




	 	1.	 	Chip and Sawlog Supply Agreement dated September 8, 1980 originally between British
Columbia Forest Products Limited and Doman Industries Limited;







	 	2.	 	Sawdust Purchase Agreement originally between Doman Forest Products Limited and Crown
Forest Industries Limited dated January 1, 1987; and







	 	3.	 	Hog Fuel Purchase Agreement originally between Doman Forest Products Limited and
British Columbia Forest Products Limited dated April 14, 1978.






As a result the parties to the above agreements are now Western Forest Products Inc. and
NorskeCanada.



Please confirm that the above is correct by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this letter
to us.

 


 









 





Yours very truly,




Brian Nordman

Vice-President, Fibre Supply



Confirmed and agreed this                      day of November, 2004




	 	 	 	 	 
	WESTERN FOREST PRODUCTS INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Per:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 







 


- 2 -
§ 58.654 Physical requirements for sherbet. ( a ) *Flavor.* The flavor of the finished sherbet shall be pleasing and desirable and characteristic of the particular flavoring used and shall impart a sweet yet tart sensation.
( b ) *Body and texture.* The body shall be firm, compact, somwhat chewy and readily melt to an even syrupy consistency at room temperatures; the texture shall be smooth but not as fine as in ice cream and shall be even throughout.
( c ) *Color.* The color shall be attractive, pleasing, uniform and characteristic of the flavor represented.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of KCAP Financial, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report), I, Edward U. Gilpin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 12, 2014

          

          By:/s/ Edward U. GilpinEdward U. Gilpin Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 57
Editorial Note: 1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

§ 57.955 Labeling of shipping containers of eggs for importation. ( a ) Shipping containers of foreign product offered for importation shall bear a label, printed in English, showing: ( 1 ) The common or usual name of the product;
( 2 ) The name of the country of origin;
( 3 ) - ( 4 ) [Reserved]
( 5 ) The quality or description of the eggs, except as required in § 57.905;
( 6 ) The words “Keep refrigerated” or words of similar meaning.
( b ) Labeling on shipping containers examined at the time of inspection in the United States, if found to be false or misleading, shall be cause for the product to be refused entry.
( c ) For properly sealed and certified shipments of shell eggs imported for breaking at an official egg products plant, the shipping containers need not be labeled, provided that the shipment is segregated and controlled upon arrival at the destination breaking plant.
( d ) In the case of products which are not in compliance solely because of misbranding, such products may be brought into compliance with the regulations only under the supervision of an authorized representative of the Administrator.
[63 FR 69968, 69971, Dec. 17, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 57168, Sept. 24, 2004]
Of Arizona (comprising of Pinal County, Pima County, Maricopa County, and rest of the state),

the four agencies stated that they lack authority under state law to regulate GHGs.
 Pinal County informed us by letter to EPA dated August 2, 2010, and by verbal communications that, based on state law, prevailing rules under the existing, approved title V program do not regulate GHGs.
 Pima County staff informed us through verbal comm unications (with Richard Grimaldi on Nov. 30) that such authority must be granted by the state before the agency can regulate GHGs under the title V program.
 Maricopa County staff also informed us through verbal communications (with Jo Crumbaker on Nov . 30) that such authority must be granted by the state before the agency can regulate GHGs under the title V program.
 ADEQ informed us by letter to EPA dated August 27, 2010, that “ADEQ does not have the authority to regulate GHGs under the PSD or Titl e V permitting programs.” They stated that “Arizona law would have to be amended before ADEQ could regulate GHGs under its PSD or Title V programs.” Of Nevada (in portions of Clark County and Washoe County only), the two agencies stated that they lack au thority to regulate GHGs (via written correspondence).
 Clark County stated in their letter submitted to EPA dated August 2, 2010, that the existing, approved title V program is not sufficient to provide authority to issue title V permits to GHG sources

.  Washoe County informed us in an e

- mail dated December 2, 2010, that their rules do not define “Title V applicability in a way that would include greenhouse gas sources as required in the Tailoring Rule. Therefore, [they] will need to implement a modi fication of the Title V applicability rules to include greenhouse gas sources.” Of Nevada (rest of state, excluding Clark County and Washoe County):
 NDEP stated that the existing, approved title V program has authority to regulate GHGs only at the 1 00 tpy threshold, but not in a manner consistent with the Tailoring Rule (via verbal communications with Greg Remer on Dec. 10).
52.211-11 Liquidated Damages-Supplies,

Services, or Research and Development.

As prescribed in 11.503(a), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts:

Liquidated Damages-Supplies, Services, or Research and Development (Sept 2000)

(a) If the Contractor fails to deliver the supplies or perform the services within the time specified in

this contract, the Contractor shall, in place of actual damages, pay to the Government liquidated

damages of $__________ per calendar day of delay [Contracting Officer insert amount].

(b) If the Government terminates this contract in whole or in part under the Default-Fixed-Price

Supply and Service clause, the Contractor is liable for liquidated damages accruing until the

Government reasonably obtains delivery or performance of similar supplies or services. These

liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause.

(c) The Contractor will not be charged with liquidated damages when the delay in delivery or

performance is beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor as defined

in the Default-Fixed-Price Supply and Service clause in this contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.211 [Reserved]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.



### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No.97-40372 Summary Calendar

BANORO GARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus STATE OF TEXAS, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (9:94-CV-172) September 29, 1997
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
# L_2022321EN.01007101.xml

| 15.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 321/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 321/71

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2014/194/EU of 11 February 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Arrangement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland on the modalities of its participation in the European Asylum Support Office

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 106 of 9 April 2014
  )

On the contents page and on page 2, in the title, in recital 2 and in Article 1:

for:

‘the Republic of Iceland’,

read:

‘Iceland’.

---
EXHIBIT 35.3
            SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
        RAMP SERIES 2006-RZ4 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
         ----------------------
         Name: Anthony N. Renzi
         Title: Managing Director
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 03-1204

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

JOHN BRENNICK,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on July 29, 2003, should

be amended as follows.

On page 8, line 6 of 2nd full paragraph, delete ", 1154".