alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4288.10 Applicant eligibility. ( a ) *Eligible projects.* To be eligible for this program, the applicant must be an eligible biorefinery utilizing only renewable biomass for replacement fuel, and must meet the requirements specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(5) of this section. ( 1 ) *Timely complete application submission.* To be eligible for this program, the applicant must submit a complete application within the application period. Projects will be selected based on ranking which is derived from the application of the selection criteria stated in § 4288.21.
( 2 ) *Multiple biorefineries.* Corporations and entities with more than one biorefinery can submit an application for only one of their biorefineries. However, if a corporation or entity has multiple biorefineries located at the same location, the entity may submit an application that covers such biorefineries provided the heat and power used in the multiple biorefineries are centrally produced.
( 3 ) *Cost-effectiveness.* The application must be awarded at least minimum points for cost-effectiveness under § 4288.21(b)(1).
( 4 ) *Percentage of reduction of fossil fuel use.* The application must be awarded at least minimum points for percentage of reduction of fossil fuel use under § 4288.21(b)(2).
( 5 ) *Full project financing.* The applicant must demonstrate that it has sufficient funds or has obtained commitments for sufficient funds to complete the repowering project taking into account the amount of the payment request in the application.
( b ) *Ineligible projects.* A project is not eligible under this subpart if it is using feedstocks for repowering that are feed grain commodities that received benefits under Title I of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008.
Summary of Fiscal 2009 and 2010 Executive Officers Base Salaries




 Exhibit 10.46 
 TIDEWATER INC. 
 SUMMARY OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BASE SALARIES AND 
 TARGET BONUS OPPORTUNITIES 
  

													
	 	  	Annual Base Salary Levels	  	Target Bonus Opportunities
As a Percentage of Base Salary	 
	 Name and Position
	  	Fiscal 2009	  	Fiscal 2010	  	Fiscal 2009	 	 	Fiscal 2010(4)	 
	 Dean E. Taylor
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	598,000	  	$	615,940	  	120	%(1)	 	120	%
					
	 J. Keith Lousteau
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(through September 30, 2008)
	  	$	327,600	  	 	—  	  	95	%(2)	 	—  	 
					
	 Quinn P. Fanning
Executive Vice President
(Beginning July 17, 2008) and
Chief Financial Officer
(Beginning October 1,
2008)
	  	$	300,000	  	$	309,000	  	67.3	(3)	 	95	%
					
	 Jeffrey M. Platt
Executive Vice President
	  	$	322,400	  	$	332,072	  	95	%(3)	 	95	%
					
	 Stephen W. Dick
Executive Vice President
	  	$	318,240	  	$	327,787	  	95	%(3)	 	95	%
					
	 Bruce D. Lundstrom
Executive Vice President,
Secretary and General Counsel
	  	$	312,000	  	$	321,360	  	90	%(3)	 	95	%
					
	 Joseph M. Bennett
Executive Vice President and
Chief Investor Relations Officer
	  	$	250,000	  	$	257,500	  	95	%(3)	 	95	%

  

	(1)	To be paid under the terms of the Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan. 

  

	(2)	Due to Mr. Lousteau’s retirement during fiscal 2009, his bonus payment was made under his Retirement Agreement. 

  

	(3)	To be paid under the terms of the Management Annual Incentive Plan. 

  

	(4)	As in past years, the bonus will be based upon economic value added (“EVA”) and safety. In prior years, the bonus of the executive officers other than the chief executive officer
included an individual performance component. In fiscal 2010, the bonus of the chief executive officer will also contain an individual performance component. 

  


 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Sciacca, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 20, 1976, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress certain physical evidence. Judgment reversed, on the law, motion to suppress granted and case remanded to Criminal Term for further proceedings consistent herewith. The motion to suppress certain physical evidence should have been granted. At 11:00 p.m. on January 13, 1976, Detective Smith, who was investigating a warehouse burglary, received, from his superior, a "tip” which had been received from an unknown informant. The informant said a truck with the same markings as the one used in the burglary had been seen at a garage at a certain address. At about 1:00 a.m. the next morning, Detective Smith arrived at this address and walked up the driveway towards the four garages located on the premises. There was no truck visible. Smith looked into each of the garages and in one of them saw boxes similar to those taken from the warehouse. In order to observe the boxes he had to jump up in the air add shine his flashlight into the garage. He did not have a search warrant. Later that morning Detective Smith returned with his partner to the premises. From a police car they observed a van go into the driveway and pull about one third of the way into the garage which contained the boxes. The two officers crossed the street and went up to the garage. There two men were observed loading the boxes from the garage into the van. The men were placed under arrest at about 10:20 a.m. Neither Detective Smith nor any other officer had made any effort to obtain a search warrant. The initial warrantless entry by Detective Smith was an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment (see *People v Gleeson,*36 NY2d 462; *People v Gravano,*67 AD2d 988). Smith had only a second-hand anonymous tip concerning the garage which could not constitute probable cause (see *People v Quattrachi,*63 AD2d 655). Moreover, Smith’s need to jump up and use a flashlight in order to see the boxes removes any possiblity that these were items in "plain view”. Thus his actions constituted a trespass (cf. *People v Smith,*42 NY2d 961; 1 La Fave, Search & Seizure, §'2.2, subd [b]). The information as to the boxes which might have furnished probable cause for defendant’s arrest was obtained during the initial improper entry and cannot be used to legitimize the arrest (see *People v Gravano, supra; People v Abruzzi,*52 AD2d 499, affd 42 NY2d 813, cert den 434 US 921). It should also be noted that Detective Smith offered no explanation of why no attempt was made to obtain a search warrant in the nearly 12-hour period from his receipt of the "tip” from his superior to defendant’s arrest. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Mangano and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
52.227-4 Patent Indemnity-Construction Contracts.       As prescribed in 27.201-2(d)(1), insert the following clause:          Patent Indemnity-Construction Contracts (Dec 2007)          Except as otherwise provided, the Contractor shall indemnify the Government and its officers, agents, and employees against liability, including costs and expenses, for infringement of any United States patent (except a patent issued upon an application that is now or may hereafter be withheld from issue pursuant to a Secrecy Order under (35 U.S.C. 181) arising out of performing this contract or out of the use or disposal by or for the account of the Government of supplies furnished or work performed under this contract.          (End of clause)          *Alternate I*                (Dec 2007). As prescribed in 27.201-2(d)(2), designate the first paragraph of the basic clause as paragraph (a) and add the following paragraph (b) to the basic clause:             (b) This patent indemnification shall not apply to the following items: __________________________________________________ [*Contracting Officer list the items to be excluded*.]    **Parent topic:** 52.227 [Reserved]
156 So.2d 606

#### Succession of Winston Albert JONES.

No. 46924.

Oct. 10, 1963.

In re: Charlene Willoughby Jones, etc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 155 So.2d 454.

Writ refused. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2717 

To temporarily reduce the duty on manicure and pedicure sets. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mrs. LINCOLN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To temporarily reduce the duty on manicure and pedicure 

sets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MANICURE AND PEDICURE SETS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.82.14 Manicure and pedicure sets, 

and combinations (provided 

for in subheading 

8214.20.90) ......................... 1.96% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 2717 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
24.103 Procedures.

(a) The contracting officer shall review requirements to determine whether the contract will involve

the design, development, or operation of a system of records on individuals to accomplish an agency

function.

(b) If one or more of those tasks will be required, the contracting officer shall-

(1) Ensure that the contract work statement specifically identifies the system of records on

individuals and the design, development, or operation work to be performed; and

(2) Make available, in accordance with agency procedures, agency rules and regulation

implementing the Act.

Parent topic: Subpart 24.1 - Protection of Individual Privacy
49.501 General.

This subpart prescribes the principal contract termination clauses. This subpart does not apply to

contracts that use the clause at 52.213-4, Terms and Conditions-Simplified Acquisitions (Other Than

Commercial Products and Commercial Services). In appropriate cases, agencies may authorize the

use of special purpose clauses, if consistent with this chapter.

Parent topic: Subpart 49.5 - Contract Termination Clauses
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mindray Medical International
Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors
and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
   June
27, 2008
 /s/ Li XitingDirector, President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
# 28.312 Contract clause for insurance of leased motor vehicles.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.228-8, Liability and *Insurance*-Leased Motor Vehicles, in *solicitations* and contracts for the leasing of motor vehicles (see subpart  8.11).

**Parent topic:**Subpart 28.3 - Insurance
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

FREDERICK JAMES SCHMIDT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5806-MCREMT

OKALOOSA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on 

September 11, 2020. ECF No. 3. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report 

and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of 

all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-05806-MCR-EMT Document 5 Filed 11/09/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5806-MCR-EMT

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 3,

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious, 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of November 2020.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05806-MCR-EMT Document 5 Filed 11/09/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 42.104 Sampling plans and defects. ( a ) *Sampling plans.* Sections 42.109 through 42.111 show the number of containers to examine for condition in relation to lot size ranges. The tables provide acceptance (Ac) and rejection (Re) numbers for lot acceptance (or rejection) based on the number, class, and type of defects present in the sample.
( b ) *Defects.* The tables in § 42.112 enumerate and classify defects according to the degree to which the individual defect affects the serviceability, including appearance as well as usability, of the container for its intended purpose. The table in § 42.113 enumerates and classifies defects of the label, marking, or code.
[31 FR 4687, Mar. 19, 1966, as amended at 36 FR 18456, Sept. 15, 1971. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977 and 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981]
#### Antranik S. Sivrian et al., Appellants, v Edward J. Kinane et al., Respondents.

nts. Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered August 22, 1979, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. The examinations shall proceed at the place designated in the order under review at a time to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by defendants, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. Defendants’ time to serve the notice is extended until 10 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof. Rabin, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129622 & (38) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices IN RE ESTATE OF JUNE LOUISA CUMMIN, 

Deceased. 

EDWARD MURPHY, Personal Representative of 

the Estate of JUNE LOUISA CUMMIN, 

Deceased, 

Petitioner-Appellee/

Cross-Appellant, 

v SC: 129622 

 COA: 253594 
 Clare PC: 00-013321-SE 

BETH HEGYI,

Respondent-Appellant/

Cross-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to 

appeal, we REVERSE that part of the judgment of the Court of Appeals that affirmed the 

probate court’s imposition of a constructive trust on the proceeds of respondent’s sale of 

the property at issue. Judge Wilder correctly concluded in In re Estate of Cummin, 258 

Mich App 402 (2003), that an agent may engage in self dealing if the principal consents 

and has knowledge of the details of the transaction and the passage of time and the 

change in decedent’s mental status could not affect respondent’s authority to transfer the 

property if decedent had consented to the transaction with knowledge of its details. Id., 

pp 409-410. Judge Wilder also correctly concluded that the Estates and Protected 

Individuals Code (EPIC) prohibition against self-dealing, MCL 700.1214, does not apply 

because respondent had an accrued right in the property before EPIC took effect on April 

1, 2000, MCL 700.8101(2)(d). Id., p 408. Application of these conclusions to the 

probate court’s factual findings that respondent and her husband credibly testified that 

decedent requested respondent to transfer the property to herself, together with the lack of 
 _________________________________________ 

 

2 

any evidence that decedent ever changed her mind in that regard, preclude the imposition 

of a constructive trust in favor of decedent’s estate. We REMAND this case to the Clare 

Probate Court for further proceedings consistent with this order. The application for 

leave to appeal as cross-appellant is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH and WEAVER, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

s0419 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 26, 2006 

Clerk
# 29.402 Foreign contracts.

- 29.402-1 Foreign fixed-price contracts. 
- 29.402-2 Foreign cost-reimbursement contracts. 
- 29.402-3 Tax on certain foreign procurements. 
- 29.402-4 Taxes—Foreign Contracts in Afghanistan. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 29.4 - Contract Clauses
```

[Federal Register: September 24, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 185)]
[Notices]               
[Page 58465-58466]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24se10-156]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7163]

 
U.S. Department of State Advisory Committee on Private 
International Law: Notice of Annual Meeting

    The Department of State's Advisory Committee on Private 
International Law (ACPIL) will hold its annual meeting on developments 
in private international law on Thursday, October 28 and Friday, 
October 29, 2010 in Washington, DC. The meeting will be held at the 
Gewirz Student Center, Georgetown University Law Center, 600 New Jersey 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20001.

[[Page 58466]]

The program is scheduled to run from 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Thursday 
and from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. on Friday.
    Time permitting, the discussion is expected to focus on 
developments in a number of areas, e.g., federalism issues in 
implementing private international law conventions (including the Hague 
Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, the UNCITRAL E-Commerce and 
Letter of Credit Conventions, and others); globalization and cross-
border corporate insolvency; international arbitration; investment 
securities, market stability and treaty law; international family law; 
private international law initiatives in the OAS; on-line dispute 
resolution; and treaty-based finance law. We encourage active 
participation by all those attending.
    Documents on these subjects are available at http://www.hcch.net; 
http://www.uncitral.org; http://www.unidroit.org; http://www.oas.org, 
and http://www.nccusl.org. We may, by e-mail, supplement those with 
additional documents.
    Please advise as early as possible if you plan to attend. The 
meeting is open to the public up to the capacity of the conference 
facility, and space will be reserved on a first come, first served 
basis. Persons who wish to have their views considered are encouraged, 
but not required, to submit written comments in advance. Those who are 
unable to attend are also encouraged to submit written views. Comments 
should be sent electronically to smeltzertk@state.gov. Those planning 
to attend should provide name, affiliation and contact information to 
Trish Smeltzer at 703-812-2382 or Niesha Toms at 703-812-2353, or by e-
mail to tomsnn@state.gov. You may also use those contacts to obtain 
additional information. A member of the public needing reasonable 
accommodation should advise those same contacts not later than October 
21st. Requests made after that date will be considered, but might not 
be able to be fulfilled.

    September 15, 2010.
Keith Loken,
Assistant Legal Adviser, Office of Private International Law, Office of 
the Legal Adviser, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-23978 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
```
52.207-2 Notice of Streamlined Competition.

As prescribed in 7.305(b), insert the following provision:

Notice of Streamlined Competition (May 2006)

(a) This solicitation is part of a streamlined competition under Office of Management and Budget

Circular No. A-76 (Revised), Performance of Commercial Activities, dated May 29, 2003 (hereafter

"the Circular"), to determine whether to accomplish the specified work under contract or by

Government performance.

(b) The Government will evaluate the cost of private sector and Agency or public reimbursable

performance, as provided in this solicitation and the Circular.

(c) A performance decision resulting from this streamlined competition will be publicly announced in

accordance with the Circular. If the performance decision favors private sector performance, the

Contracting Officer shall either award a contract or issue a competitive solicitation for private sector

offers. If the performance decision favors Agency or public reimbursable performance, the Agency

shall establish, respectively, either a letter of obligation or a fee-for-service agreement, as those

terms are defined in the Circular.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.207 [Reserved]