alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 6.28 Transfer of license. ( a ) If a licensee sells or conveys its business involving articles covered by this subpart to another person, including the complete transfer of the attendant assets, the Licensing Authority will transfer to such other person the historical, nonhistorical or designated license issued for that quota year. Such sale or conveyance must be unconditional, except that it may be in escrow with the sole condition for return of escrow being that the Licensing Authority determines that such sale does not meet the requirements of this paragraph.
( b ) The parties seeking transfer of license shall give written notice to the Licensing Authority of the intended sale or conveyance described in paragraph (a) of this section by email. The notice must be received by the Licensing Authority at least 20 working days prior to the intended consummation of the sale or conveyance. Such notice shall include electronic copies of the documents of sale or conveyance. The Licensing Authority will review the documents for compliance with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section and advise the parties in writing of its findings by the end of the 20-day period. The parties shall have the burden of demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Licensing Authority that the contemplated sale or conveyance complies with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section. Within 15 days of the consummation of the sale or conveyance, the parties shall email the final documents to the Licensing Authority. The Licensing Authority will not transfer the licenses unless the documents are submitted in accordance with this paragraph.
( c ) The eligibility for a license of a person to whom a business is sold or conveyed will be determined for the next quota year in accordance with § 6.23. For the purposes of § 6.23(b)(1) the person to whom a business is sold or conveyed shall be deemed to be the person to whom the historical licenses were issued during the quota year in which the sale or conveyance occurred. Further, for the purposes of § 6.23(b) and (c), the entries made under such licenses by the original licensee during the year in which the sale of conveyance is made, shall be considered as having been made by the person to whom the business was sold or conveyed.
[80 FR 44254, July 27, 2015]
Case 4:01-cr-00036-MW-MAF Document 183 Filed 07/18/23 Page 1 of 2
July 18, 2023

s/ Mark E. Walker, Chief District Judge, Northern District of Florida

Case 4:01-cr-00036-MW-MAF Document 183 Filed 07/18/23 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Shelter Properties VII Limited Partnership 1998 First Quarter 10-QSB
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000758009
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES VII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998   
<CASH>                                             780
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      214
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          21,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,113)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,669   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         11,071     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,297    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,669    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   977    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   843    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 224    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       134     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.76<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### Mezzacappa Bros., Inc., Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.

[815 NYS2d 549]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered October 18, 2004, which granted defendant’s motion to amend its answer to assert an affirmative defense based on contract, and thereupon granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The parties entered into a contract in 1995 for the delivery and installation of water mains and appurtenances. The contract was subsequently extended to May 2, 1997, after which defendant rescinded all remaining work orders. After an unsuccessful effort to obtain another extension of the contract, plaintiff received final payment in October 2001, and cashed that payment in December. In January 2002, three months after final payment was sent and six weeks after it was cashed, plaintiff served a notice of claim on the Comptroller.

This action was commenced in April 2002. After joinder of issue, defendant sought to amend its answer to include an eleventh affirmative defense that plaintiff had failed to serve a timely statement of claim on the City. Article 44 of the contract required the contractor to serve a detailed and verified statement of any claim on the contracting agency and the Comptroller within 40 days after the mailing of final payment.

Leave to amend a pleading is freely granted within the court’s discretion (CPLR 3025 [b]) in the absence of prejudice or surprise *(Edenwald Contr. Co. v City of New York,*60 NY2d 957 [1983]). Since defendant was entitled to rely on article 44, the motion court properly permitted the pleading amendment to allege plaintiffs failure to meet the notice-of-claim requirement. Such requirements constitute “conditions precedent to suit or recovery” *(A.H.A. Gen. Constr. v New York City Hous. Auth.,*92 *495NY2d 20, 30-31 [1998]; *see also City of New York v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.,*284 AD2d 195 [2001]). Where the parties to a contract have made an event a condition of their agreement, there must be strict compliance *(see Oppenheimer & Co. v Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.,*86 NY2d 685 [1995]). Accordingly, plaintiff is precluded from maintaining the present action.

We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
#### § 51.3059 Overripe.

*Overripe* means that the avocado is dead ripe with flesh soft or discolored and past commercial use.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Alarm SystemsCrime PreventionElectronic EquipmentElementary Secondary EducationSchool SafetySchool SecurityTechnology

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
# L_2014309EN.01003701.xml

| 30.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 309/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 309/37

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on deposit guarantee schemes

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 173 of 12 June 2014
  )

On page 172, Article 21, first paragraph:

for:

‘... 4 July 2019 ...’,

read:

‘... 4 July 2015 ...’.

---
52.242-13 Bankruptcy.

As prescribed in 42.903 , insert the following clause:

Bankruptcy (July 1995)

In the event the contractor enters into proceedings relating to bankruptcy, whether voluntary or

involuntary, the contractor agrees to furnish, by certified mail or electronic commerce method

authorized by the contract, written notification of the bankruptcy to the contracting officer

responsible for administering the contract. This notification shall be furnished within fivedays of the

initiation of the proceedings relating to bankruptcy filing. This notification shall include the date on

which the bankruptcy petition was filed, the identity of the court in which the bankruptcy petition

was filed, and a listing of government contract numbers and contracting offices for all government

contracts against which final payment has not been made. This obligation remains in effect until

final payment under this contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.242 [Reserved]
#### § 51.2714 Similar varietal characteristics.

*Similar varietal characteristics* means that the peanut kernels in the lot are not of distinctly different varieties. For example, Spanish type shall not be mixed with Runners.
#### § 58.327 Frozen cream.

To produce frozen cream eligible for official certification, the quality of the cream used shall meet the requirements of cream acceptable for the manufacture of U.S. Grade AA or U.S. Grade A butter.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Morales, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 17, 1978, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see *Anders v California, 386*US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; cf. *People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 3:20cv5893 – MCR/HTC

DAVID POSCHMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

NEWMAN-DAILEY RESORT PROPERTIES, INC. 

Defendant.

____________________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY stipulated by and between Plaintiff, DAVID POSCHMAN, and Defendant, 

NEWMAN-DAILEY RESORT PROPERTIES, INC., that the above cause, having been amicably 

resolved between Plaintiff, DAVID POSCHMAN, and Defendant, NEWMAN-DAILEY 

RESORT PROPERTIES, INC., be dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear their own 

expenses, costs and attorneys’ fees in the matter. 

DATED this 14th day of January, 2021.

Drew M. Levitt, Esq. LYDECKER DIAZ

Counsel for Plaintiff Counsel for Defendant

4700 N.W. Boca Raton Boulevard, Suite 302 1221 Brickell Avenue, 19th Floor

Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Miami, FL 33131

drewmlevitt@gmail.com sp@lydeckerdiaz.com

/s/ Drew M. Levitt /s/ Stephanie Pidermann

Drew M. Levitt, Esq, Esq. Stephanie Pidermann, Esq.

FBN: FBN: 60414

Case 3:20-cv-05893-MCR-HTC Document 12 Filed 01/14/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0341

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SAMUEL RICHARD BONKO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 8, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 1 2021

11/01/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0341
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 5:94cr5026LAC

RICHARD ANTHONY THOMAS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on November 16, 2006

Motion/Pleadings: COMBINE MOTION PURSUANT TO 18 USC § 3582(c)(2) of the

sentencing guidelines §1B1.10 for modification of sentence based on guideline amendment 505,

effective November 1, 1994, and misapplication of the U.S.S.G. pursuant to Rule 35(a)

F.R.Civ.P. 

Filed byDEFENDANT PRO SE on 11/7/2006 Doc.# 314

RESPONSES:

BY GOVERNMENT on 11/15/2006 Doc.# 316

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 20th day of

November, 2006, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) The Court finds the well-reasoned response of the Government to be an

accurate statement of the law and facts on this case, and it is adopted by this

Court as the basis for the denial of defendant’s motion. 

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 5:94-cr-05026-LC-MD Document 317 Filed 11/20/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.2 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Sanford H. Barber, President and Chief Financial Officer of Wes Consulting, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 10, 2008  /s/SANFORD H. BARBERSanford H. Barber
Principal Financial Officer
52.222-37 Employment Reports on Veterans.

As prescribed in 22.1310(b), insert the following clause:

Employment Reports on Veterans (Jun 2020)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause, "active duty wartime or campaign badge veteran," "Armed

Forces service medal veteran," "disabled veteran," "protected veteran," and "recently separated

veteran," have the meanings given in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)22.1301.

(b) Unless the Contractor is a State or local government agency, the Contractor shall report at least

annually, as required by the Secretary of Labor, on-

(1) The total number of employees in the contractor’s workforce, by job category and hiring location,

who are protected veterans (i.e., active duty wartime or campaign badge veterans, Armed Forces

service medal veterans, disabled veterans, and recently separated veterans);

(2) The total number of new employees hired during the period covered by the report, and of the

total, the number of protected veterans (i.e., active duty wartime or campaign badge veterans,

Armed Forces service medal veterans, disabled veterans, and recently separated veterans); and

(3) The maximum number and minimum number of employees of the Contractor or subcontractor at

each hiring location during the period covered by the report.

(c) The Contractor shall report the above items by filing the VETS-4212 "Federal Contractor

Veterans’ Employment Report" (see "VETS-4212 Federal Contractor Reporting" and "Filing Your

VETS-4212 Report" at http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm).

(d) The Contractor shall submit VETS-4212 Reports no later than September 30 of each year.

(e) The employment activity report required by paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this clause shall

reflect total new hires, and maximum and minimum number of employees, during the most recent

12–month period preceding the ending date selected for the report. Contractors may select an

ending date-

(1) As of the end of any pay period between July 1 and August 31 of the year the report is due; or

(2) As of December 31, if the Contractor has prior written approval from the Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission to do so for purposes of submitting the Employer Information Report

EEO-1 (Standard Form 100).

(f) The number of veterans reported must be based on data known to the contractor when

completing the VETS-4212. The contractor’s knowledge of veterans status may be obtained in a

variety of ways, including an invitation to applicants to self-identify (in accordance with 41 CFR

60-300.42), voluntary self-disclosure by employees, or actual knowledge of veteran status by the

contractor. This paragraph does not relieve an employer of liability for discrimination under 38

U.S.C.4212.

(g) The Contractor shall insert the terms of this clause in subcontracts valued at or above the

threshold specified in FAR 22.1303(a) on the date of subcontract award, unless exempted by rules,

regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor.
(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
#### § 63.402 Confidentiality.

All information obtained from books, records, reports, or any other material obtained under the Act and this part, shall be kept confidential by all persons, including employees and former employees of the NSIIC. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to prohibit the issuance of general statements based upon the reports or the statistical data, which statements do not identify the information furnished by any entity.
file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/sanitized%20report/sanitized%20engineering%20reports/p090253.sanitized.eng.txt[5/11/2010 1:13:25 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: 

PMN: 09-0253

Focus Ready Draft 3/19/2009

ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ JAS

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Label: 

Gen Eqpt: 

Respirator:

Health Effects: 

TLV/PEL:

CRSS :

Chemical Name: 

S-H20: g/L @

VP: torr @

MW: %<500 %<1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (03/13/2009):

Migration to groundwater: 

PBT rating: 

Health: 

Eco: 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: 

PMN: 09-0253
file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/sanitized%20report/sanitized%20engineering%20reports/p090253.sanitized.eng.txt[5/11/2010 1:13:25 PM]

Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 15

unknown site(s)

Days/yr: 250

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same

medium.

Water or Incineration or Landfill

High End: 6.2E+0 kg/site-day over 2 days/yr from 15 sites

or 1.9E+2 kg/yr

to: uncertain

from: 

basis: 

Water or Incineration or Landfill

Conservative: 2.7E-2 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 15 sites

or 10.0E+1 kg/yr

to: 

from: 

basis: 

RELEASE TOTAL

2.9E+2 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 45

Basis: The submission does not address the number of workers

potentially exposed at customer sites. CEB assumes the standard

default minimum of 3 workers/site (over 15 sites).

Inhalation:

negligible (VP < 0.001 torr)

Dermal:

Exposure to Liquid at 100.00% concentration

High End: 1.8E+3 mg/day over 250 days/yr

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 45

Basis:
§ 621.30 Description. ( a ) As provided by Pub. L. 87-639, joint investigations and reports by USDA and the Department of the Army may be authorized by resolutions adopted by the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the U.S. Senate or the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the U.S. House of Representatives for any watershed area in the 50 States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands if the nature of the watershed area problems dictates need for a joint effort by the two Departments.
( b ) Authorized joint investigations and reports are made to determine works of improvement needed in the study area for flood prevention; for the conservation, development, use, and disposal of water; for flood control; for the conservation and proper use of land; and for allied purposes. The joint report to Congress may include a water and related land resources plan recommended for implementation. Such an implementation plan must be accompanied by an environmental impact statement (EIS) and must be in sufficient detail to permit its implementation.
( c ) As mutually agreed by USDA and the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, the report and EIS are forwarded to Congress through appropriate channels after technical, public, and interagency reviews in accordance with NRCS policy as described in § 622.34, or in accordance with the Corps of Engineers' policy concerning technical and public review. Implementation of these plans is contingent on congressional action.
#### § 58.619 Mix processing room.

The rooms used for combining mix ingredients and processing the mix shall meet the applicable requirements for rooms specified in § 58.126. The room shall be ventilated to remove moisture and prevent condensation from forming on walls and ceiling. The room shall be well lighted.