alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2739 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 214. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. CHAFEE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 214. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 214. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.03 Pigment Yellow 214 (provided for in subheading 

3204.17.60) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 2739 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 255 

To amend the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 

to provide assistance for residential properties designated as Superfund sites. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2005 

Mr. HAGEL (for himself and Mr. NELSON of Nebraska) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 to provide assistance for residential 

properties designated as Superfund sites. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GRANTS FOR LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARD RE4 DUCTION IN TARGET HOUSING. 

5 Section 1011 of the Residential Lead-Based Paint 

6 Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4852) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by redesignating subsection (p) as sub9 section (q); and 
2 

•S 255 IS

1 (2) by inserting after subsection (o) the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(p) PRIORITY FOR SUPERFUND SITES.—In award4 ing grants under this section, the Secretary shall give pri5 ority consideration to activities to be undertaken on resi6 dential properties listed on the National Priorities List es7 tablished under section 105 of the Comprehensive Envi8 ronmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 

9 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9605).’’. 

Æ
§ 623.15 Transfer of land. ( a ) If a new owner purchases or obtains the right and interest in, or right to occupancy of, the land subject to a EWRP easement, such new owner shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the easement. The participant who is the signatory to the easement shall be entitled to receive all remaining payments, if any, for the purchase of the easement. Eligible cost-share payments shall be made to the participants. with respect to costs actually incurred.
( b ) Upon the transfer of the property subject to an EWRP easement, any remaining cost-share payments shall be paid to the new owner or purchaser only if the new owner or purchaser becomes a party to the WRPO within 60 days of the perfection of the deed transferring title to the new owner. Such payments shall be paid in the manner agreed to by the participant and the buyer. The new owner or purchaser shall be responsible for assuring completion of all measures and practices required by the contract and the WRPO.
( c ) Any transfer of the property prior to the perfection of the easement shall void any NRCS offer or WRPO unless the new owner agrees to accept the offer within 60 days of the perfection of the deed transferring the land to the new owner.
MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE
                           WITH REGULATION AB CRITERIA

                                FEBRUARY 26, 2007

        SunTrust  Bank (the  "Asserting  Party") is  responsible  for  assessing
compliance  with  the  servicing   criteria  set  forth  in  Title  17,  Section
229.1122(d)(2)(i),  229.1122(d)(4)(i)  and  229.1122(d)(4)(ii)  of the  Code  of
Federal  Regulations  (the "CFR") (the  "Applicable  Servicing  Criteria"),  for
securitization  transactions serviced by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. occurring after
December  31,  2005  (the  "Platform").  The  Asserting  Party is not  assessing
compliance with any other criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the CFR.

        The  Asserting  Party used the  applicable  criteria in paragraph (d) of
Title 17, Section  229.1122 of the CFR to assess  compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

        The Asserting Party has concluded that it has complied,  in all material
respects,  with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the twelve month
period ending December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period").

        PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP, an independent registered public accounting
firm, has issued an attestation  report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable  Servicing  Criteria  for the  Reporting  Period as set forth in this
assertion.


SUNTRUST BANK
Solely with respect to Sections 229.1122(d)(4)(i) and 229.1122(d)(4)(ii)


By: /s/ Rosealma T. Burton
Name:   Rosealma T. Burton
Title:  First Vice President

SUNTRUST BANK
Solely with respect to Section 229.1122(d)(2)(i)


By: /s/ Tomas E. Suarez
    -------------------------
Name:   Tomas E. Suarez
Title:  Vice President
#### Angel HERNANDEZ-REYES, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-76367.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 13, 2007 *.

Filed Aug. 22, 2007.

Angel Hernandez-Reyes, Monrovia, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Oil, Kurt B. Larson, Esq., Stacy S. Paddack, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*430Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Angel Hernandez-Reyes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. *Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales,*468 F.3d 1159, 1163 (9th Cir.2006). We review constitutional claims de novo, *see Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition for review.

Hernandez-Reyes contends that the agency violated his right to equal protection by not allowing him to apply for suspension of deportation. This contention is unavailing because Hernandez-Reyes was served with a notice to appear in 2003, when suspension of deportation was no longer available. *See Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 1105, 1107-08 (9th Cir. 2003) (holding that being placed in removal proceedings rather than deportation proceedings does not violate a petitioner’s due process rights); *Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft,*291 F.3d 594, 602-03 (9th Cir.2002) (rejecting equal protection claim and upholding congressional “line drawing” decisions that are rationally related to a legitimate government purpose).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EX-33 (i)
Securities Servicing
The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street
New York, NY 10286


(logo) The BANK
of NEW YORK

ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING
CRITERIA


The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.(collectively,
the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of compliance with the
servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d),
to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to any
transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1) (ii), (iii), (iv),
(4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

* The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.


1


(page)


* The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

* As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing assessment of
compliance.


The Bank of New York
The Bank of New York Trust
Company, N.A.

/s/ Robert L. Griffin
Robert L. Griffin
Authorized Signer


The Bank of New York
The Bank of New York Trust
Company, N.A.

/s/ Patrick J. Tadie
Patrick J. Tadie
Authorized Signer

March 1, 2007


2
#### § 60.103 Commingled covered commodities.

*Commingled covered commodities* means covered commodities (of the same type) presented for retail sale in a consumer package that have been prepared from raw material sources having different origins.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2732 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 219. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. CHAFEE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 219. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 219. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.77 Pigment Yellow 219 (provided for in subheading 

3204.17.60) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 2732 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Alfred Vetere, Petitioner, v Town of Hempstead, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to review a determination of the respondent Town of Hempstead, dated July 11, 1978 and made after a hearing, which found the petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and dismissed him from his position. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. On the entire record, the determination is supported by substantial evidence and the penalty of dismissal is not so disproportionate to the offense, in the light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see *Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 233). Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1051

ALVIE R. RUDASH, Petitioner, versus CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (02-0296-BLA) Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 3, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alvie R. Rudash, Petitioner Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, Barry H. Joyner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; William Steele Mattingly, JACKSON KELLY, P.L.L.C., Morgantown, West Virginia, for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alvie R. Rudash seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. SeeRudash v. DOWCP , No. 02-0296-BLA (BRB Nov. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of McCombs Realty Partners (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: November 8, 2007 
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: November 8, 2007 





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 1 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 2 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 3 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 4 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 5 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 6 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 7 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 8 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 9 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 10 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 11 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 12 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 13 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 14 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 15 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 16 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 17 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 18 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 19 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 20 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 21 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 22 of 23
Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/02/03 Page 23 of 23
#### David S. Pultz et al., Appellants, v Catherine Economakis et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 20, 2007;

decided October 23, 2007

Reported below, 40 AD3d 24.

Motion by the Office of the Manhattan Borough President for leave to file an affirmation amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the affirmation is accepted as filed.
**POPULAR
      MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.**





Officer's
      Certificate





Annual
      Statement of Servicer





Popular
      ABS, Inc. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-D





Pursuant
      to the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above captioned
      series (the “ **Agreement** ”),
      the
      undersigned hereby certifies that he is an officer of Popular Mortgage
      Servicing, Inc. (the “ **Servicer** ”),
      and
      does hereby further certify that:





1.   A
      review
      of the Servicer’s activities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and
      of its performance under the Agreement has been made under his supervision;
      and





2.   To
      the
      best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
      its
      obligations under the Agreement throughout such fiscal year.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Officer's Certificate on
      behalf of the Servicer as of this 12th day of March, 2007.











POPULAR
      MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC .






By: 
      /s/ Dennis J. Lauria


Name: Dennis J. Lauria


Title:  Senior
      Vice President
**EXHIBIT 33.2**

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

**SERVICER’S REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

Washington Mutual Bank (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (the “Reporting Period”) of the Platform Transactions (as defined below) with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB (12 CFR part 229.1122), except the following criteria 1(iii) and3(i)(C) and (D), which we have concluded are either (i) not applicable to the servicing of the mortgage loans included in the Platform Transactions (each, a “Mortgage Loan”), or (ii) performed by other parties with respect to the Mortgage Loans(such criteria, after giving effect to the foregoing exceptions, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”)**.**  The transactions covered by this Servicer’s Assessment are those securitizations of pools of mortgage loans that werecompleted on or after January 1, 2006 and prior to January 1, 2007 for which the Asserting Party performed servicing functions set forth in Item 1122(d), that included one or more classes of publicly offered securities registered with the Securities and ExchangeCommission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, and for which the Asserting Party has an obligation to deliver an Assessment of Compliance pursuant to Item 1122 (the “Platform Transactions”).

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period, using the Applicable Servicing Criterion, and hasconcluded that it has complied in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Mortgage Loans.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Asserting Party’s assessment of compliance with theApplicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period.

Dated:  March 14, 2007

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK 

By: ___*/s/ H. John Berens*Name:  H. John BerensTitle:    Senior Vice President
§ 610.22 State Technical Committee membership. ( a ) State Technical Committees will include agricultural producers, nonindustrial private forest land owners, and other professionals who represent a variety of disciplines in soil, water, wetlands, plant, and wildlife sciences. The State Conservationist in each State will serve as chairperson. The State Technical Committee for each State will include representatives from among the following, if willing to serve: ( 1 ) NRCS, USDA;
( 2 ) Farm Service Agency, USDA;
( 3 ) State Farm Service Agency Committee, USDA;
( 4 ) Forest Service, USDA;
( 5 ) National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA;
( 6 ) Each of the Federally recognized Indian Tribes in the State;
( 7 ) State departments and agencies within the State, including the: ( i ) Fish and wildlife agency;
( ii ) Forestry agency;
( iii ) Water resources agency;
( iv ) Department of agriculture;
( v ) Association of soil and water conservation districts; and
( vi ) Soil and water conservation agency;
( 8 ) Agricultural producers representing the variety of crops and livestock or poultry raised within the State;
( 9 ) Owners of nonindustrial private forest land;
( 10 ) Nonprofit organizations, within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, with demonstrable conservation expertise and experience working with agriculture producers in the State;
( 11 ) Agribusiness; and
( 12 ) The State Cooperative Extension Service and land grant universities in the State.
( b ) The State Conservationist will invite other relevant Federal, State, and regional agencies, organizations, and persons knowledgeable about economic and environmental impacts of natural resource conservation techniques and programs to participate as needed.
( c ) To ensure that recommendations of State Technical Committees take into account the needs of the diverse groups served by USDA, membership will include, to the extent practicable, individuals with demonstrated ability to represent the conservation and related technical concerns of particular historically underserved groups and individuals; i.e., minorities, women, persons with disabilities, socially and economically disadvantaged groups, and beginning farmers and ranchers.
( d ) In accordance with the guidelines in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section, it is the responsibility of the State Conservationist to seek a balanced representation of interests among the membership on the State Technical Committee. Individuals or groups wanting to participate on a State Technical Committee within a specific State may submit a request to the State Conservationist that explains their interest and outlines their credentials which they believe are relevant to becoming a member. Decisions regarding membership are at the discretion of the State Conservationist. State Conservationist decisions on membership are final and not appealable to any other individual or group within USDA.
[74 FR 66912, Dec. 17, 2009, as amended at 84 FR 19702, May 6, 2019]