alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FSA Response to Comments

Carol Lindsey

Vice President Policy and Compliance

Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation 

P.O. Box 83100 

Round Rock, TX 78683

Carol.lindsey@tgslc.com

Dear Ms. Lindsey,

Thanks you for your comment regarding the information collection associated with the Personal 

Authentication Service (PAS) for the FSA ID. Below please find a response to the comments identified in 

your submission.

Comment Summary: Recommendation to delete the option to create a “limited FSA ID”

FSA has removed the option to create a limited FSA ID.

Sincerely,

Catherine Metcalf

Project Manager 

Becky Pribyl

Aberdeen, SD 57401

Becky.pribyl@northern.edu

Dear Ms. Pribyl,

Thank you for your comments regarding the information collection associated with the Personal 

Authentication Service (PAS) for the FSA ID. Below please find responses to the summary comments 

identified in your submission.
Comment Summary: New process is confusing and a barrier to completing the FAFSA

The new process mirrors industry best practices and was developed to minimize barriers while 

maintaining security. FSA is required to safeguard a user’s personal information. Without the changes 

we are implementing, information could be vulnerable to an external attack.

Comment Summary: Request for number of Forgot PINs to be published on FSA’s website

FSA has referred this question to the appropriate business unit for review.

Comment Summary: Password should be valid for more than 15 months

User passwords are valid for 18 months.

Comment Summary: Duplication with FAFSA which asks for a password

To eliminate confusion, the FAFSA on the Web transaction password field will change to “Save Key.”

Sincerely,

Catherine Metcalf

Project Manager

Deanne Loonin

National Consumer Law Center (NCLC)

7 Winthrop Square

Boston, MA 02110-1245

dloonin@nclc.org

Dear Ms. Loonin, 
Thank you for your comments regarding the information collection associated with the Personal 

Authentication Service (PAS) for the FSA ID on behalf of the clients of the NCLC. Below please find 

responses to the comments identified in your submission.

Comment Summary: Balance of Security and Access

It is important to balance security and access for users. Specifically, the FSA ID password will be valid for 

18 months before requiring it to be reset. Thank you for your recommendation to notify servicers when 

a password requires resetting. This recommendation will be considered as part of future releases.

Comment Summary: Curbing Improper Third Party Access to Borrower Identification Information

FSA has referred this recommendation to the appropriate business unit for review.

Thank you again for taking the time to provide comment on the information collection associated with 

the new FSA ID, Person Authentication Service.

Sincerely,

Catherine Metcalf

Project Manager
Exhibit 10


Exhibit 10.1       




INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY

Summary of Named Executive Officer and Director Compensation Arrangements

Exhibit to Form 10Q for period ended March 31, 2009




Executive Officers

In addition to the annual base salaries noted in the table below, compensation arrangements for our executive officers include benefits paid under any applicable employment contracts, other IGT Plans for Management Bonus (including Cash Sharing), Stock Incentives, Profit Sharing, and Deferred Compensation as more fully described in exhibits to our annual report on Form 10-K or interim quarterly Form 10-Q filed with the SEC.  These individuals also receive certain perquisites as explained in our annual proxy statement.  Except for employment contracts that are on file with the SEC, these are at-will employment arrangements.




					
	Name

	 
	Title

	 
	Base

 Salary (1)


	Patti S. Hart

	 
	President, Chief Executive Officer

	 
	$800,000


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Thomas J. Matthews

	 
	Chairman of the Board

	 
	$840,000


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Patrick Cavanaugh

	 
	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

	 
	$300,000


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	David D. Johnson

	 
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel

	 
	$525,000


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Richard Pennington

	 
	Executive Vice President, Corporate Strategy

	 
	$420,000










(1) Amounts reported in our proxy statement may vary depending on the timing of pay period during the fiscal year




Directors

Annual Retainer 

a

$65,000 paid in quarterly installments

a

Prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, members may elect to receive all or a part of the total retainer in the form of a restricted stock award




Board and Committee Meeting Fees

a

Board - $1,500 per meeting attended after 8 meetings have been held and attended

a

Audit - $1,500 per meeting attended after 10 meetings have been held and attended

a

Compensation, Nominating & Corporate Governance, and Compliance - $1,500 per meeting attended after 4 meetings have been held.  Special Committee - $1,500 for each in-person meeting plus travel expenses.




Additional Annual Retainer for Board Committee Members (payable in quarterly installments)

a

Lead Independent Director - $70,000 cash and an additional grant of restricted shares having a grant-date value of $30,000

a

Chair:  Audit - $35,000; Compensation, Nominating & Corporate Governance, and Compliance - $20,000

a

Member: Audit - $17,500; Compensation, Nominating & Corporate Governance, Compliance, Special Committee - $10,000




Equity Grants 

a

Upon election to the board:  20,000 stock options and 5,000 restricted shares vesting ratably over 3 years

a

Annual grant:  11,000 stock options and 2,750 shares restricted shares with 1-year vesting
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1940-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Arizona (FEMA-1940-DR), dated October 4, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         November 22, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Arizona is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of October 4, 2010.

The Hopi Tribe for Public Assistance. The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-30607 Filed 12-6-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
28.203-4 Solicitation provision and contract clause.       (a)Insert the provision at 52.228-17, Individual Surety—Pledge of Assets (Bid Guarantee), in solicitations that require the submission of a bid guarantee.                                          (b)Insert the clause at 52.228-11, Individual Surety—Pledge of Assets, in solicitations and contracts that require the submission of performance or payment bonds.    **Parent topic:** 28.203 Individual Sureties.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of O2 Secure Wireless, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”),does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:

1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) of the Company complies inall material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

*/s/ T. Scott Conley*

T. Scott Conley, ChiefExecutive Officer

Date: February 14, 2007

 

----
# L_2014267EN.01000701.xml

| 6.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 267/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 267/7

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUCAP NESTOR/2/2014

of 24 July 2014

on the acceptance of third States' contributions to the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR)

(2014/645/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2012/389/CFSP of 16 July 2012 on the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR) (1), and in particular Article 10(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 10(3) of Decision 2012/389/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of proposed contributions by third States. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 10(3) of Decision 2012/389/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of proposed contributions by third States.

| (2) | Following the recommendation on a contribution from Australia by the Civilian Operations Commander, the contribution from Australia should be accepted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following the recommendation on a contribution from Australia by the Civilian Operations Commander, the contribution from Australia should be accepted.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   The contribution from Australia to the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR) is accepted and is considered to be significant.

2.   Australia is exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUCAP NESTOR.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 24 July 2014.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 187, 17.7.2012, p. 40.

1

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of George Taylor, Appellant, v Raleigh Hotel et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Submitted July 16, 2007;

decided September 11, 2007

Reported below, 35 AD3d 1053.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### Frank H. Hiscock Legal Aid Society, Appellant, v Richard Hennessy, District Attorney, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated at Special Term, Aloi, J. (see, also, *Matter of Urban League of Rochester, N. Y. v County of Monroe,*49 NY2d 551). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court — dismiss complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
|Front cover of printed report | Two Months of Flooding in Eastern North Carolina, September - October 1999:  Hydrologic Water-Quality, and Geologic Effects of Hurricanes Dennis, Floyd, and Irene
    Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4093
         Raleigh, North Carolina 2000By Jerad D. Bales, Carolyn J. Oblinger, and Asbury H. Sallenger, Jr.
|----------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

- Front--311KB (3 pages)
- Overview--6,160KB (4 pages)
- Rainfall--7,012KB (6 pages)
- Flooding--5,348KB (11 pages)
- Water quality--8,475KB (18 pages)
- Centerfold showing area of hurricane--373KB (1 page)
- Shoreline Changes--6,081KB (4 pages)
- Summary and Conclusions--1,846KB (2 pages)
- References--844KB (2 pages)

---

---

|**U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR**
            BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary **U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY**
            Charles G. Groat, Director | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 

---

|**Return to the**                 | WRI 00-4093 Home Page
|--------------------------------- | ---------------------
|North Carolina District Home Page

---
#### § 412.1 General statement.

This part is issued in accordance with the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture published at 7 CFR 1.1-1.23, and appendix A, implementing the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). The Secretary's regulations, as implemented by this part, and the Risk Management Agency (RMA) govern availability of records of the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) as administration of the crop insurance program for FCIC.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JERRY DUCKWORTH,

D.O.C. # A–439302,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv502–WS/MAF

OFFICER GRIFFIN, et al,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 8) docketed March 31, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that this case

be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with a court

order.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 8) is adopted
Page 2 of 2

and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint and this action are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with a court order.

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment, stating: "All claims are dismissed

without prejudice."

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of May , 2021.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### In the Matter of Melvin J., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

Submitted July 9, 2007;

decided September 18, 2007

Reported below, 35 AD3d 609.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, appellant having previously moved in the Court of Appeals for leave to appeal (8 NY3d 957 [2007]) from the same Appellate Division order from which he currently seeks leave to appeal. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
#### Lillian Horowitz et al., Respondents, v City of New York, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 3, 1979, unanimously modified, on consent, to reduce plaintiff-respondent husband’s judgment to the amount contained in the *ad damnum*clause, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Fein, Ross and Bloom, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Robert G. Horner, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Greenblott, J.

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 15, 1968, which held him ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that he was not totally unemployed (Labor Law, § 522), holding that he willfully misrepresented his employment status to receive benefits, for which a forfeiture of 44 effective days was imposed (Labor Law, § 594), and charging him with an overpayment of $605 in benefits which was ruled to be recoverable. Appellant was laid off on May 6, 1967 and thereafter filed for benefits, asserting total unemployment. The board found that appellant was not totally unemployed when filing for benefits, noting that “ He spent substantial time and effort, preparing his land for a golf course, which he expected to operate at a profit.” We cannot find as a matter of law that the board erred in its conclusion. On the evidence, the board could properly find that claimant was self-employed, and therefore not totally unemployed *(Matter of Jordal*[Catherwood], 28 A D 2d 745). The board could also properly determine that claimant, in denying self-employment, willfully misrepresented his employment status to obtain benefits *(Matter of Soroka*[Catherwood], 24 A D 2d 920). Hence, any benefits received as a result thereof were required to be repaid *(Matter of Czagany [Catherwood],*28 A D 2d 1049). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Aulisi, Cooke and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by Greenblott, J.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 4:01cr21-RH/WCS

4:07cv263-RH/WCS

MORRIS DEWAYNE GREEN,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING §2255 MOTION

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 50) and the objections thereto (document 52). I have

reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the opinion

of the court. The clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Defendant’s motion for relief

under 28 U.S.C. §2255 (document 46) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE as

untimely.” The clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED this 13th day of November, 2007.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:01-cr-00021-RH-WCS Document 53 Filed 11/13/07 Page 1 of 1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNeutron and gamma irradiation effects on power semiconductor switchesThe performance characteristics of high power semiconductor switches subjected to high levels of neutron fluence and gamma dose must be known by the designer of the power conditioning, control and transmission subsystem of space nuclear power systems. Location and the allowable shielding mass budget will determine the level of radiation tolerance required by the switches to meet performance and reliability requirements. Neutron and gamma ray interactions with semiconductor materials and how these interactions affect the electrical and switching characteristics of solid state power switches is discussed. The experimental measurement system and radiation facilities are described. Experimental data showing the effects of neutron and gamma irradiation on the performance characteristics are given for power-type NPN Bipolar Junction Transistors (BJTs), and Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors (MOSFETs). BJTs show a rapid decrease in gain, blocking voltage, and storage time for neutron irradiation, and MOSFETs show a rapid decrease in the gate threshold voltage for gamma irradiation.Document ID19900015962Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSchwarze, G. E.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Frasca, A. J.*(Wittenberg Univ. Springfield, OH., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:103200NASA-TM-103200E-5598Meeting InformationMeeting: Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering ConferenceLocation: Reno, NVCountry: United StatesStart Date: August 12, 1990End Date: August 17, 1990Sponsors:AIChE,ASME,ANS,IEEE,SAE,ACS,AIAAAccession Number90N25278Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 590-13-31Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900015962.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Thomas Clay Dickerson, * From the 39th District Court

of Stonewall County,

Trial Court No. 1972.

Vs. No. 11-18-00268-CR * October 30, 2020

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.