Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Notices 75963 

• Get the official U.S. time from 

NIST. 

• Get my local weather from the 

National Weather Service. 

• Other. 

3. Were you able to complete the 

purpose of your visit today? (Yes, No) 

One of the following two (2) questions 

are posed to respondents based on their 

answers to Question 3. (4.1, if answer 

was Yes; and 4.2, if answer was No) 

4.1 What do you value most about the 

Department of Commerce’s Web site? 

(Open ended) 

4.2 Please tell us why you were not 

able to fully complete the purpose of 

your visit today? (Open ended) 

The survey is provided by 

iPerceptions as part of their 4Q suite. No 

personally identifiable information will 

be collected from the voluntary 

participants. 

II. Method of Collection 

Information will be collected via an 

online form. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: None. 

Form Number(s): None. 

Type of Review: Regular submission 

(new information collection). 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households, Business or other for-profit 

organizations, State, Local, or Tribal 

government, Federal government. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

36,000. 

Estimated Time per Response: 2 

minutes. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 1,200. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: $0. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: December 2, 2010. 

Gwellnar Banks, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30654 Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–03–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1726] 

Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 

138 Under Alternative Site Framework, 

Columbus, OH, Area 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Board adopted the 

alternative site framework (ASF) in 

December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09; 

correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09) as an 

option for the establishment or 

reorganization of general-purpose zones; 

Whereas, Columbus Regional Airport 

Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade 

Zone 138, submitted an application to 

the Board (FTZ Docket 46–2010, filed 7/ 

21/2010, amended 10/6/2010) for 

authority to reorganize under the ASF 

with a service area of Champaign, Clark, 

Coshocton, Crawford, Delaware, 

Fairfield, Franklin, Hocking, Knox, 

Licking, Logan, Madison, Marion, 

Morrow, Muskingum, Perry, Pickaway, 

Pike, Ross, Union, Vinton and Wyandot 

Counties, as well as portions of 

Guernsey, Athens and Highland 

Counties, Ohio, adjacent to the 

Columbus Customs and Border 

Protection port of entry, FTZ 138’s 

existing Sites 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 15 would 

be categorized as magnet sites, and FTZ 

138’s existing Sites 13, 14, 16, 17, and 

18 would be categorized as usage-driven 

sites; 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (75 FR 45096–45097, 8/2/2010) 

and the application has been processed 

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendations of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal is in the public 

interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 

The application to reorganize FTZ 138 

under the alternative site framework is 

approved, subject to the FTZ Act and 

the Board’s regulations, including 

Section 400.28, to the Board’s standard 

2,000-acre activation limit for the 

overall general-purpose zone project, to 

a five-year ASF sunset provision for 

magnet sites that would terminate 

authority for Sites 2, 4, 5, 6, and 15, on 

November 30, 2015 and to a three-year 

ASF sunset provision for usage-driven 

sites that would terminate authority for 

Sites 13, 14, 16, 17, and 18 if no foreignstatus merchandise is admitted for a 

bona fide customs purpose by 

November 30, 2013. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of 

November 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30665 Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[Application No. 92–9A001] 

Export Trade Certificate of Review 

ACTION: Notice of Issuance of an 

amended Export Trade Certificate of 

Review to Aerospace Industries 

Association of America (‘‘AIA’’) 

(Application #92–9A001). 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce issued an amended Export 

Trade Certificate of Review to 

Aerospace Industries Association of 

America on November 29, 2010. The 

Certificate has been amended eight 

times. The previous amendment was 

issued to AIA on October 5, 2009, and 

a notice of its issuance was published in 

the Federal Register on October 26, 

2009 (74 FR 54961). The original 

Certificate for AIA was issued on 

September 8, 1992, and a notice of its 

issuance was published in the Federal 

Register on September 14, 1992 (57 FR 

41920). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joseph E. Flynn, Director, Office of 

Competition and Economic Analysis, 

International Trade Administration, by 

telephone at (202) 482–5131 (this is not 

a toll-free number) or e-mail at 

etca@trade.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of 

the Export Trading Company Act of 

1982 (15 U.S.C. Sections 4001–21) 

authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to 

issue Export Trade Certificates of 

Review. The regulations implementing 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
75964 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Notices 

1As the 30-day extension falls on Sunday, 

January 30, 2011, the deadline for the preliminary 

results of review will be the next business day, 

which is January 31, 2011. 

Title III are found at 15 CFR Part 325 

(2010). 

The Office of Competition and 

Economic Analysis (‘‘OCEA’’) is issuing 

this notice pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b), 

which requires the Secretary of 

Commerce to publish a summary of the 

certification in the Federal Register. 

Under Section 305(a) of the Act and 15 

CFR 325.11(a), any person aggrieved by 

the Secretary’s determination may, 

within 30 days of the date of this notice, 

bring an action in any appropriate 

district court of the United States to set 

aside the determination on the ground 

that the determination is erroneous. 

Description of Amended Certificate 

AIA’s Export Trade Certificate of Review 

has been amended to 

1. Add the following new Members of 

the Certificate within the meaning of 

section 325.2(1) of the Regulations (15 

CFR 325.2(1)): 

Acutec Precision Manufacturing, Inc., 

Saegertown, PA; Airdat LLC, 

Morrisville, NC; Alcoa Defense, Crystal 

City, VA; Alliant Techsystems, Inc. 

(ATK), Minneapolis, MN; ANSYS, Inc., 

Canonsburg, PA; ArmorWorks 

Enterprises, LLC, Chandler, AZ; 

Bombardier, Montreal, Canada; Broad 

Reach Engineering Company, Golden, 

CO; Celestica Corporation, Toronto, 

Canada; Deloitte Consulting LLP, New 

York, NY; Guardsmark, LLC, New York, 

NY; Integral Systems, Inc., Columbia, 

MD; Jabil Defense & Aerospace Services 

LLC, St. Petersburg, FL; KPMG LLP, 

New York, NY; M7 Aerospace L.P., San 

Antonio, TX; Microsemi Corporation, 

Irvine, CA; OSI Systems, Inc., 

Hawthorne, CA; Pacifica Engineering, 

Inc., Mukiliteo, WA; Paragon Space 

Development Corporation, Tucson, AZ; 

Plexus Corporation, Neenah, WI; PWC 

Aerospace & Defense Advisory Services, 

McLean, VA; SAP Public Services, Inc., 

Washington, DC; SRA International, 

Inc., Fairfax, VA; Tech Manufacturing, 

LLC, Wright City, MO; Therm, 

Incorporated, Ithaca, NY; TIMCO 

Aviation Services, Inc., Greensboro, NC; 

Triumph Group Inc., Wayne, PA; UFC 

Aerospace, Bay Shore, NY; Vermont 

Composites, Inc., Bennington, VT; 

Xerox Corporation, Norwalk, CT. 

2. Make the following changes in 

name or address of existing Members: 

Accenture is now located in Chicago, 

IL, with controlling entity Accenture 

plc, Dublin, Ireland; AAR 

Manufacturing, Inc., Wood Dale, IL, is a 

Member in place of its controlling 

entity, AAR Corp., Wood Dale, IL; 

Barnes Group Inc., Bristol, CT, has 

replaced its subsidiary Barnes 

Aerospace, Windsor, CT, as the 

Member; Chromalloy Power Services 

Corporation, San Antonio, TX, has 

changed its name to Chromalloy (at the 

same location). The controlling entity 

remains the Carlyle Group, Washington, 

DC; Computer Sciences Corporation 

(CSC) moved from El Segundo, CA, to 

Falls Church, VA; Ducommon 

Incorporated moved from Long Beach, 

CA, to Carson, CA. Elbit Systems of 

America, LLC, Fort Worth, TX, the 

controlling entity of EFW Inc., Fort 

Worth, TX, has replaced EFW, Inc., as 

Member. The controlling entity of Elbit 

Systems of America, LLC, is Elbit 

Systems, Ltd., of Haifa, Israel. Electronic 

Data Systems Corporation, Plano, TX, 

has changed its name to HP Enterprise 

Services—Aerospace, Palo Alto, CA; 

General Electric Aviation, Cincinnati, 

OH, has replaced its controlling entity, 

General Electric Company, Fairfield, CT, 

as Member; Microsat Systems, Inc., 

Littleton, CO, has changed its name to 

Sierra Nevada Corporation, Space 

Systems, Littleton, CO; RTI 

International Materials Inc., has moved 

from Niles, OH, to Pittsburgh, PA; 

Science Applications International 

Corporation has moved from San Diego, 

CA, to McLean, VA; Sparton 

Corporation, Jackson, MI, has moved to 

Schaumburg, IL; Vought Aircraft 

Industries, Inc., Dallas, TX, has changed 

its name to Triumph Aerostructures— 

Vought Aircraft Division. The 

controlling entity is Triumph Group, 

Inc., Wayne, PA. 

Dated: December 1, 2010. 

Joseph E. Flynn, 

Director, Office of Competition and Economic 

Analysis. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30524 Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–875] 

Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 7, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karine Gziryan, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 4, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4081. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 28, 2010, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published 

the initiation of the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on non-malleable cast iron pipe fittings 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’). See Initiation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews, 75 FR 29976, 29983 (May 28, 

2010). The period of review is April 1, 

2009, through March 31, 2010. The 

preliminary results of this 

administrative review are currently due 

no later than December 31, 2010. 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results of Review 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), the Department shall make a 

preliminary determination in an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of the date of publication of the 

order. Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

further provides, however, that the 

Department may extend the 245-day 

period to 365 days if it determines it is 

not practicable to complete the review 

within the foregoing time period. 

The Department determines that it is 

not practicable to complete the 

administrative review of non-malleable 

cast iron pipe fittings from the PRC 

within the time limits mandated by 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act because 

this review involves examining a 

number of complex issues related to 

factors of production and surrogate 

values, as well as requesting and 

analyzing additional information from 

NEP Tianjin Machinery Company in a 

supplemental questionnaire. Therefore, 

we find that additional time is needed 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this administrative review. As a result, 

in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) 

of the Act, the Department is extending 

the time period for completion of the 

preliminary results of this 

administrative review, which is 

currently due on December 31, 2010, by 

30 days to January 30, 2011.1 The 

deadline for the final results of the 

review continues to be 120 after the 

publication of the preliminary results. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i) of the Act. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES