Cause No. 03-14-00512-CR CRAE ROBERT PEASE Appellant

v. /RECEIVED \ NOV 1 6 Z015 THIRD COURTOFAPPEALS. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee 

### BaKYLE"^APPELLANT'S 2nd MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD AND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

### Crae Robert Pease, Appellant, makes this Motion to Supplement the Record in 

### Support of Appellant's Brief, pursuant to Rule 10.1 and 10.2, Tex.R.App.Proc, and as grounds therefore would show the Court: I. 

### This cause was heard in the Travis County Court at Law No. 6 in August 11, 2014 under trial court Cause No. C-l-CR-13-220, styled The State ofTexas v. Crae Robert Pease. II. 

### While preparing his appeal, which he planned to file today, Appellant found that there was no Reporter's Record for a hearing on July 11, 2014. III. 

### The hearing was to question the validity of the information, which was altered at the hearing on July 11, 2014. Because there are irregularities in

### information which werepreserved on therecord of thatdate, Appellant requires the Reporter's record from that date in orderto complete his appeal. This request is not meant forpurposes of delay, but to verify and document appellant issues. 

### WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that the Court 

### will grant thisMotion and supplementtherecord with theReporter's record ofJuly 11,2014 and extend the time to file his brief to one week after the record is filed. Respectfully submitted,

Crae Robert Pease 6715 Skynook Drive Austin, Texas 78745
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

### On November 16, 2015, Appellant conferred with William Swaim, attorney 

### for Appellee, and Mr. Swaim responded that he had no objection to the extension oftime.
Crae Robert PeaseCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### On November 16, 2015, a copy ofthe attached motion for extension oftime was sent by U. S. Postal Service to: William Swaim Travis County Attorney's Office P.O. Box 1748 Austin, Texas 78767Nothing in the information establishes the supposition that Travis County courts have jurisdictionover this matter, therefore, the informationis defective, the defect is ofa jurisdiction nature, and therefore must be quashed. Brown v. State, 558 S.W.2d 471 (Tex.CrApp.1977). Respectfully submitted,

Crae Robert Pease CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that a true and correct copy ofthe attached Motion to Quash information was sent by e-mail and personal service on July 11, 2014 to: Travis County Special Prosecutor Bill Swaim Travis County chiefProsecutor County Court at Law #6. Randall SlagleNothing in the information establishes the supposition that Travis County courts have jurisdiction over this matter,therefore, the information is defective, the defect is of a jurisdiction nature,and therefore must be quashed. Brown v. State, 558 S.W.2d 471 (Tex.Cr.App.1977). Respectfully submitted,

Crae Robert Pease CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that a true and correct copy ofthe attached Motion to Quash information was sent by e-mail and personal service on July 11,2014 to: Travis County Special Prosecutor Bill Swaim Travis County chiefProsecutor County Court at Law #6. Randall Slagle ._.—--