alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Inter-American Foundation Board Meeting

# TIME AND DATE:

 December 13, 2010, 9 a.m.-2 p.m.

# PLACE:

 901 N. Stuart Street, Tenth Floor, Arlington, Virginia 22203.

# STATUS:

 Open session except for the portion specified as closed session as provided in 22 CFR 1004.4(f).

## Matters To Be Considered

■ Approval of the Minutes of the March 29, 2010, Meeting of the Board of Directors.

■ Advisory Council Report and Recommendations.

■ Role of Advisory Council.

■ President's Report.

■ IAF Program Activities.

■ Operations.

■ Congressional Affairs.

■ RedEAmerica.

■ IAF Going Forward.

■ Executive Session—Personnel Issues.

## Portions To Be Open To The Public

■ Approval of the Minutes of the March 29, 2010, Meeting of the Board of Directors.

■ Advisory Council Report and Recommendations.

■ Role of Advisory Council.

■ President's Report.

■ IAF Program Activities.

■ Operations.

■ Congressional Affairs.

■ RedEAmerica.

■ IAF Going Forward.

## Portions To Be Closed To The Public

■ Executive Session—Personnel issues. Closed session as provided in 22 CFR Part 1004.4(f).

# Contact Person For More Information:

Jennifer Hodges Reynolds.

Dated: November 23, 2010.

Jennifer Hodges Reynolds,

General Counsel, (703) 306-4301.

[FR Doc. 2010-30270 Filed 11-26-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7025-01-P
**Exhibit 33.3**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

** **

** **

**SERVICER’S REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31,2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (the “Reporting Period”) of the Platform Transactions (as defined below) with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB (12 CFR part 229.1122)(“Item 1122(d)”), except the following criteria 1122 (d)(1)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii)-(iv), 1122 (d)(2)(vi), 1122 (d)(3)(i)(C), 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(iv), and 1122 (d)(4)(vi)-(xv), which we have concluded are either (i) not applicable to theservicing of the mortgage loans included in the Platform Transactions (each, a “Mortgage Loan”), or (ii) performed by other parties with respect to the Mortgage Loans (such criteria, after giving effect to the foregoing exceptions, the“Applicable Servicing Criteria”)**.**  The transactions covered by this Servicer’s Assessment are those securitizations of pools of mortgage loans that were completed on or after January 1, 2006 and prior to January 1, 2007 for whichthe Asserting Party performed servicing functions set forth in Item 1122(d)and that included one or more classes of publicly offered securities registered with the Securities and ExchangeCommission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period, using the Applicable ServicingCriterion, and has concluded that it has complied in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Mortgage Loans, except that, with respect to compliance with Item1122 (d)(2)(vii)(B), two oftwelvebank statement reconciliationsexaminedwerenot preparedwithin30calendardays afterthe bank statement cutoff date, but were prepared within 30 calendar days after month end,whichwas32 calendar days after the bank statement cutoff date**.**

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Asserting Party’s assessment ofcompliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period.

 

Dated:  February 22, 2007

 

WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.

 

 

By: /s/  Barbara Campbell        

Name:  Barbara Campbell

Title:    First Vice President
- 1 - Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

via email and regulations.gov

December 28, 2011

Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division Office of Aviation Analysis Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590

Re: DCA-Jackson, Mississippi Within-Perimeter Slot Exemptions
Docket DOT-OST-2000-7182

Dear Mr. DeVany:

Delta wishes to inform the Department that effective March 2, 2012, Delta will cease offering nonstop Delta Connection service between Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) and Jackson, Mississippi. These service are cu rrently operated by ASA, using DCA exemption slots awarded by Order 2004-12-6.

Sincerely,

Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director, Government Affairs
and Associate General Counsel

cc: jon.lindlief@flyasa.com
info@airlineinfo.com

Docket DOT-OST-2000-7182
#### In the Matter of Stephen Foreman, Petitioner, v Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, Respondent.

ceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (instituted in this court pursuant to the Education Law, § 6510, subd 4) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Education, which suspended for three months petitioner’s license to practice podiatry and imposed a fine of $1,000. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. (See *Tartack v New York State Dept, of Educ.,*75 AD2d 953.) Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Casey, JJ., concur.
52.228-2 Additional Bond Security.

As prescribed in 28.106-4(a), insert the following clause:

Additional Bond Security (Oct 1997)

The Contractor shall promptly furnish additional security required to protect the Government and

persons supplying labor or materials under this contract if-

(a) Any surety upon any bond, or issuing financial institution for other security, furnished with this

contract becomes unacceptable to the Government;

(b) Any surety fails to furnish reports on its financial condition as required by the Government;

(c) The contract price is increased so that the penal sum of any bond becomes inadequate in the

opinion of the Contracting Officer; or

(d) An irrevocable letter of credit (ILC) used as security will expire before the end of the period of

required security. If the Contractor does not furnish an acceptable extension or replacement ILC, or

other acceptable substitute, at least 30 days before an ILC’s scheduled expiration, the Contracting

officer has the right to immediately draw on the ILC.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.228 [Reserved]
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 113 (Thursday, June 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33750-33751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13747]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[9912-16-Region-3]

Notice of Administrative Settlement Agreement for Recovery of 
Past Response Costs Pursuant to Section 122(h) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as 
Amended

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), notice is hereby given 
that a proposed administrative settlement agreement for recovery of 
past response costs (``Proposed Agreement'') associated with Absco 
Scrap Yard Site, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania was executed by the 
Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'') and is now subject to public 
comment, after which EPA may modify or withdraw its consent if comments 
received disclose facts or considerations that indicate that the 
Proposed Agreement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The 
Proposed Agreement would resolve potential EPA claims under Section 
107(a) of CERCLA, against Absco Inc., Sandra Blumberg and Marvin 
Blumberg (``Settling Parties''). The Proposed Agreement would require 
Settling Parties to

[[Page 33751]]

reimburse EPA $85,000.00 for past response costs incurred by EPA for 
the Site.
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this 
notice, EPA will receive written comments relating to the Proposed 
Agreement. EPA's response to any comments received will be available 
for public inspection at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before thirty (30) days after 
the date of publication of this notice.

ADDRESSES: The Proposed Agreement and additional background information 
relating to the Proposed Agreement are available for public inspection 
at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch 
Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103. A copy of the Proposed Agreement may be 
obtained from Jefferie E. Garcia (3RC42), Senior Assistant Regional 
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1650 Arch Street, 
Philadelphia, PA 19103. Comments should reference the ``Absco Scrap 
Yard Site, Proposed Administrative Settlement Agreement for Recovery of 
Past Response Costs'' and ``EPA Docket No. CERCLA-03-2014-0005-CR,'' 
and should be forwarded to Jefferie E. Garcia at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jefferie E. Garcia (3RC42), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 
19103, Phone: (215) 814-2697; garcia.jefferie@epa.gov.

    Dated: May 27, 2014.
Cecil Rodrigues,
Director, Hazardous Site Cleanup Division, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2014-13747 Filed 6-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
52.214-18 Preparation of Bids-Construction.       As prescribed in 14.201-6(l), insert the following provision:          Preparation of Bids-Construction (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            Bids must be-                                                         (1) 								                Submitted on the forms furnished by the Government or on copies of those forms, and                                                            (2)                         *Manually signed.* The person signing a bid must initial each erasure or change appearing on any bid form.                                                                             (b) 						            The bid form may require bidders to submit bid prices for one or more items on various bases, including-                                                         (1) 								                Lump sum bidding;                                                            (2) 								                Alternate prices;                                                            (3) 								                Units of construction; or                                                            (4) 								                Any combination of paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(3) of this provision.                                                                             (c) 						            If the solicitation requires bidding on all items, failure to do so will disqualify the bid. If bidding on all items is not required, bidders should insert the words "no bid" in the space provided for any item on which no price is submitted.                                          (d) 						            Alternate bids will not be considered unless this solicitation authorizes their submission.                                 (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.214 [Reserved]
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Franklin Johnson, Respondent, v New York State Board of Parole et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on December 12, 1979 unanimously reversed, on the law, the order vacated, and the writ of prohibition dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. (See *People ex rel. Lambertis v New York State Bd. of Parole,*72 AD2d 694.) Concur—Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Markewich and Carro, JJ.
# L_2014121EN.01005901.xml

| 24.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 121/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 121/59

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1369/2013 of 13 December 2013 on Union support for the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme in Lithuania, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1990/2006

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 346 of 20 December 2013
  )

In the contents and on page 7, in the title:

for:

‘Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1369/2013 of 13 December 2013 on Union support for the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme in Lithuania, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1990/2006’,

read:

‘Council Regulation (EU) No 1369/2013 of 13 December 2013 on Union support for the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme in Lithuania, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1990/2006’.

---
**Exhibit 33.5**

** **

**REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH**

**§1122(d)(2)(vi) and §1122(d)(4)(xi)**

**of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA**

** **

 

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc., collectivelythe “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in§1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs with respect to allmortgage loan-tracking transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all mortgage loan-tracking transactions for which the Asserting Party served as a Vendor on behalf of Servicers for such asset-backed securities transactionsthat were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Platform”). The scope of the Asserting Party assertions excludes §1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) ofthe Code of Federal Regulations, which relates to servicing activities that are performed by the Asserting Party with respect to the Platform, but are not reported on herein.

 

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with§1122(d)(2)(vi) and §1122(d)(4)(xi) ("theApplicable Servicing Criteria") for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. The AssertingParty used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

The Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the ApplicableServicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period ending December 31, 2006 as set forth in this assertion.

 

     American Security Insurance Company

     Standard Guaranty Insurance Company

     Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.

 

/s/ John Frobose

By: John FroboseSenior Vice President

 

 

Date: February 23, 2007
47.305-2 Solicitations f.o.b. origin and f.o.b. destination-lowest overall cost.       (a) 						            Solicitations, when appropriate, shall specify that offers may be f.o.b. origin, f.o.b. destination, or both; and that they will be evaluated on the basis of the lowest overall cost to the Government.                                          (b) 						            When offers are solicited on the basis of both f.o.b. origin and f.o.b. destination, the contracting officer shall insert in solicitations the provision at 52.247-45, F.o.b. Origin and/or F.o.b. Destination Evaluation.    **Parent topic:** 47.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
47.305-2 Solicitations f.o.b. origin and f.o.b.

destination-lowest overall cost.

(a) Solicitations, when appropriate, shall specify that offers may be f.o.b. origin, f.o.b. destination, or

both; and that they will be evaluated on the basis of the lowest overall cost to the Government.

(b) When offers are solicited on the basis of both f.o.b. origin and f.o.b. destination, the contracting

officer shall insert in solicitations the provision at 52.247-45, F.o.b. Origin and/or F.o.b. Destination

Evaluation.

Parent topic: 47.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
§ 3560.64 Initial operating capital contribution. Borrowers are required to make an initial operating capital contribution to the general operating account in the amount of at least 2 percent of the total development cost or appraised value, whichever is less. ( a ) Borrowers that are nonprofit organizations, consumer cooperatives, or state or local public agencies and are not receiving low-income housing tax credits, may use loan funds for their initial operating capital contribution. All other borrowers must fund the initial operating capital contribution from their own resources.
( b ) Borrowers must provide to the Agency for approval a list of materials and equipment to be funded from the general operating account for initial operating expenses. As specified in § 3560.304(b), initial operating capital may be used only to pay for approved budgeted expenses. If total initial operating expenses exceed 2 percent, the additional amount must be paid by the borrower from its own resources, except that borrowers meeting the provisions of § 3560.64(a) who do not have sufficient resources for this purpose may request Agency assistance. Withdrawals from the reserve account will not be approved for such expenses.
( c ) Borrowers must provide the Agency with documentation of their initial operating capital contribution deposited into the general operating account prior to the start of construction or loan closing, whichever comes first, and such funds thereafter, may only be used for authorized budgeted purposes.
( d ) If the conditions specified in § 3560.304(c) are met, funds contributed as initial operating capital may be returned to the borrower.
162 So.2d 12

#### Leon WALKER v. Richard E. BROWN, Jr., Administrator, Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor, State of Louisiana, and Shreveport Grain & Elevator Co.

No. 47172.

March 31, 1964.

In re: Richard E. Brown, Jr., Administrator of the Division of Employment *962Security, Department of Labor, State of Louisiana applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish t of Caddo. 160 So.2d 258.

Writ refused. The result is correct.
Subpart 27.5 - Foreign License and Technical

Assistance Agreements

Parent topic: Part 27 - Patents, Data, and Copyrights

27.501 General.

Agencies shall provide necessary policy and procedures regarding foreign technical assistance

agreements and license agreements involving intellectual property, including avoiding unnecessary

royalty charges.
22.1305 Waivers.       (a) 						            The Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Department of Labor, may waive any or all of the terms of the clause at 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans, for-                                                         (1) 								                Any contract if a waiver is in the national interest; or                                                            (2) 								                Groups or categories of contracts if a waiver is in the national interest and it is-                                                                           (i) 										                    Impracticable to act on each request individually; and                                                                              (ii) 										                    Determined that the waiver will substantially contribute to convenience in administering the Act.                                                                                                                            (b) 						            The head of the agency may waive any requirement in this subpart when it is determined that the contract is essential to the national security, and that its award without complying with such requirements is necessary to the national security. Upon making such a determination, the head of the agency must notify the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor in writing within 30 days.                                          (c) 						            The contracting officer must submit requests for waivers in accordance with agency procedures.                                          (d) 						            The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor may withdraw an approved waiver for a specific contract or group of contracts to be awarded, when in the Deputy’s judgment such action is necessary to achieve the purposes of the Act. The withdrawal does not apply to awarded contracts. For procurements entered into by sealed bidding, such withdrawal does not apply unless the withdrawal is made more than 10 calendar days before the date set for the opening of bids.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 22.13 - Equal Opportunity for Veterans
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 3:20cr40-008/MCR

ALICIA RUTLEDGE

_____________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of the 

Defendant, Alicia Rutledge, to Count One of the superseding indictment is hereby 

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of June 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### § 52.1848 Sizes of golden seedless raisins.

The size designations and measurement requirements for the respective sizes of Golden Seedless Raisins are the same as for Seedless Raisins (See § 52.1845).