alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Annual Report of Green Planet Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
  1. 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.
  Date:
      July 16, 2009By:
                /s/ Edmond,
      L. LonerganName: 
      Edmond, L. LonerganTitle: 
      Chief Executive Officer


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Green Planet Group,
Inc. and will be retained by Green Planet Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
52.222-49 Service Contract Labor StandardsPlace of Performance Unknown.

As prescribed in 22.1006(f), insert the following clause:

Service Contract Labor Standards-Place of Performance Unknown (May 2014)

(a) This contract is subject to the Service Contract Labor Standards statute, and the place of

performance was unknown when the solicitation was issued. In addition to places or areas identified

in wage determinations, if any, attached to the solicitation, wage determinations have also been

requested for the following: ________ [insert places or areas]. The Contracting Officer will request

wage determinations for additional places or areas of performance if asked to do so in writing by

_____________ [insert time and date].

(b) Offerors who intend to perform in a place or area of performance for which a wage determination

has not been attached or requested may nevertheless submit bids or proposals. However, a wage

determination shall be requested and incorporated in the resultant contract retroactive to the date

of contract award, and there shall be no adjustment in the contract price.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

         The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Orion
HealthCorp, Inc. (the "small business issuer"), hereby certifies as follows:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer (the
"Report"), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the small
business issuer.

Dated this 14th day of November, 2007.

/s/ Terrence L. Bauer
----------------------------------------------
Terrence L. Bauer, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the small business issuer and
will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 624.4 Definitions. ( a ) *Defensibility* means the extent to which an action is: ( 1 ) More beneficial than adverse in the extent and intensity of its environmental and economic effects;
( 2 ) In compliance with Federal, State, and local laws;
( 3 ) Acceptable to affected individuals and communities;
( 4 ) Effective in restoring or protecting the natural resources;
( 5 ) Complete with all necessary components included; and
( 6 ) Efficient in achieving the desired outcome.
( b ) *Exigency* means those situations that demand immediate action to avoid potential loss of life or property, including situations where a second event may occur shortly thereafter that could compound the impairment, cause new damages or the potential loss of life if action to remedy the situation is not taken immediately.
( c ) *Floodplain easement* means a reserved interest easement, which is an interest in land, defined and delineated in a deed whereby the landowner conveys all rights and interest in the property to the grantee, but the landowner retains those rights, title, and interest in the property which are specifically reserved to the landowner in the easement deed.
( d ) *Imminent threat* means a substantial natural occurrence that could cause significant damage to property or threaten human life in the near future.
( e ) ( 1 ) *Limited resource area* is defined as a county where: ( i ) Housing values are less than 75 percent of the State housing value average; and
( ii ) Per capita income is 75 percent or less than the National per capita income; and
( iii ) Unemployment is at least twice the U.S. average over the past 3 years based upon the annual unemployment figures.
( 2 ) NRCS will use the most recent National census information available when determining paragraphs (e)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section.
( f ) *Natural occurrence* includes, but is not limited to, floods, fires, windstorms, ice storms, hurricanes, typhoons, tornadoes, earthquakes, volcanic actions, slides, and drought.
( g ) *Project sponsor* means a State government or a State agency or a legal subdivision thereof, local unit of government, or any Native American tribe or tribal organization as defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b), with a legal interest in or responsibility for the values threatened by a watershed emergency; is capable of obtaining necessary land rights; and is capable of carrying out any operation and maintenance responsibilities that may be required.
( h ) *Watershed emergency* means adverse impacts to resources exist when a natural occurrence causes a sudden impairment of a watershed and creates an imminent threat to life or property.
( i ) *Watershed impairment* means the situation that exists when the ability of a watershed to carry out its natural functions is reduced to the point where an imminent threat to health, life, or property is created. This impairment can also include sediment and debris deposition in floodplains and upland portions of the watershed.
#### Red Grove Social Club, Inc., Respondent, v. City of Yonkers et al., Appellants.

In an action to enjoin interference with the operation of a social club and for other relief, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 25, 1969, which granted plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Order modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by (1) inserting into the first decretal paragraph, after the word “granted”, the phrase “only to the extent directed herein,”; (2) striking out the second decretal paragraph and substituting therefor the following: “ ordered that The City of Yonkers and its agents be and they are hereby restrained and enjoined only from interfering with the efforts of the plaintiff, Red Grove Social Club, Inc., to correct the alleged violations of the Fire Prevention Code of the City of Yonkers, and it is further”; and (3) adding the following as a fourth decretal paragraph: “ ordered that this action be given a trial preference and be tried forthwith.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. The case is remanded to the court below for further proceedings in accordance herewith. The circumstances require that the defendant city be permitted to enforce its Fire Prevention Code. Thus, the preliminary injunction should have been granted only to the extent of permitting plaintiff to correct the alleged violations of the code. An immediate trial of the action should be had. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
#### Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. *v.*Cotton.

Appeal from Birmingham City Conrt.

Tried before the Hon. H. A. Sharpe.

Walker Percy and W. I. Grubb, for appellant.

No counsel marked as appearing for appellee.

This action was brought by the appellee against the appellant. The cause of action, as stated, was for the value of services performed on Sundays, by the plaintiff, who was a State convict and had been leased to the de*670fendant during his term of service. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals. The judgment is reversed on the authority of *Sloss Iron & Steel Co. v. Harvey, ante,*p. 656, and judgment rendered in favor of the defendant.

Opinion by

Haralson, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 10-72]

# AGENCY:

Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10-72 with attached transmittal, and policy justification.

Dated: December 1, 2010.

Morgan F. Park,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 76416)          ( print page 76417)          ( print page 76418)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[FR Doc. 2010-30728 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### Ole Quelprud *vs.*C. H. Kothe.

Submitted on briefs April 9, 1894

Affirmed April 20, 1894.

No. 8462.

Verdict supported by the evidence.

The evidence in this case was sufficient to justify the verdict.

Appeal by defendant, C. H. Kothe, from an order of the District Court of Bock County, *P. E. Brown,*J., made May 12, 1893, refusing his application for a new trial.

The plaintiff, Ole Quelprud, worked for defendant as servant on his farm from March 25, to September 19, 1892, at $22 per month. He brought this action to recover $88.65 the unpaid balance of his wages. Defendant claimed that he had paid the man in full. The jury found for the plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was made by defendant, but was denied and he appeals.

*A. J. Daley,*for appellant.

*L. S. Nelson,*for respondent.

*115Per Curiam.

As was stated by the court below in its charge to the jury, no exception being taken thereto, the only dispute between the parties was whether plaintiff had been paid in full for his services, and on this the finding was in his favor. There was evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict, for we do not agree with counsel for defendant in his assertion that plaintiff’s testimony was so inconsistent, improbable, and contradictory that it should have been wholly rejected.

Order affirmed.

(Opinion published 58 N. W. 682.)
52.247-55 F.o.b. Point for Delivery of

Government-Furnished Property.

As prescribed in 47.305-12(a)(2), insert the following clause:

F.o.b. Point for Delivery of Government-Furnished Property (June 2003)

(a) Unless otherwise specified in this solicitation, the Government will deliver any Governmentfurnished property for use within the contiguous United States or Canada to a point specified by the

Contractor in the offer. If the Government makes delivery by railroad, the f.o.b. point will be private

siding, Contractor’s plant. If the Contractor’s plant is not served by rail, the f.o.b. point will be

railroad cars in the same or nearest city having rail service. The Government may choose the mode

of transportation and the carriers and will bear the cost of all line-haul transportation to the

specified destination.

(b) If the destination of the Government-furnished property is a Contractor’s plant located outside

the contiguous United States or Canada, the f.o.b. point for Government delivery of Governmentfurnished property will be a Contractor-specified location in the contiguous United States. If the

Contractor fails to name a point, the Government will select as the f.o.b. point the port city in the

contiguous United States nearest to the Government-furnished property that has regular commercial

water transportation services to the offshore port nearest the Contractor’s plant.

(c) Unless otherwise directed by the Contracting Officer or provided in the contract, the Contractor

shall return all Government-furnished equipment, supplies, and property, including all property not

returned in the form of acceptable end items, to the point at which the Government property was

originally furnished to the Contractor under the contract. Notwithstanding the fact that the

Government may have furnished the property at the Contractor’s plant, the Contracting Officer may

direct the Contractor to deliver the Government property being returned to, and load, block, and

brace it in, railway cars in the city in which the Contractor’s plant is located, or, if the Contractor’s

city is not served by rail service, in the nearest city having rail service. Unless otherwise specified in

the contract, all property shall be packed in containers conforming with the rules of common carrier

published tariffs so as to be free of penalty charges by the carrier designated for shipment by the

Government.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66364-66365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26502]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Senior Executive Service; Performance Review Board; Amendment

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Designation of Performance Review Board Standing Register.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) published a notice in the 
Federal Register on October 8, 2014, (79 FR 60845) listing the names of 
the Performance Review Board Standing Register. This document amends 
that notice by removing the name of Sarah Gamage and adding in its 
place, the

[[Page 66365]]

name of Sharlene Weatherwax. DOE also published a correction notice on 
October 27, 2014 (79 FR 63915). Also added are the new names listed 
below as alternates for the Performance Review Board Standing Register.

DATES: This appointment is effective as of September 30, 2014.

Campagnone, Mari-Jo
Grose, Amy
Horton, Linda
Livengood, Joanna
Lockwood, Andrea
Rasar, Kimberly

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 3, 2014.
Tonya M. Mackey,
Director, Office of Executive Resources.
[FR Doc. 2014-26502 Filed 11-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
# 52.249 [Reserved]

- 52.249-1 Termination for Convenience of the Government (Fixed-Price) (Short Form). 
- 52.249-2 Termination for Convenience of the Government (Fixed-Price). 
- 52.249-3 Termination for Convenience of the Government (Dismantling, Demolition, or Removal of Improvements). 
- 52.249-4 Termination for Convenience of the Government (Services) (Short Form). 
- 52.249-5 Termination for Convenience of the Government (Educational and Other Nonprofit Institutions). 
- 52.249-6 Termination (Cost-Reimbursement). 
- 52.249-7 Termination (Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer). 
- 52.249-8 Default (Fixed-Price Supply and Service). 
- 52.249-9 Default (Fixed-Price Research and Development). 
- 52.249-10 Default (Fixed-Price Construction). 
- 52.249-11 [Reserved] 
- 52.249-12 Termination (Personal Services). 
- 52.249-13 [Reserved] 
- 52.249-14 Excusable Delays. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         561,667
<SECURITIES>                                 1,993,875
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                    54,600
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,316,395
<PP&E>                                      38,338,431
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,946,482
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,702,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,077,841
<BONDS>                                     27,473,556
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,702,219
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,197,573
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,101,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,460,582
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,242,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (193,460)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
46.705 Limitations.

(a) Except for the warranties in the clauses at 52.246-3, Inspection of Supplies-Cost-Reimbursement,

and 52.246-8, Inspection of Research and Development-Cost-Reimbursement, the contracting officer

shall not include warranties in cost-reimbursement contracts, unless authorized in accordance with

agency regulations (see 46.708).

(b) Warranty clauses shall not limit the Government’s rights under an inspection clause (see subpart 

46.3) in relation to latent defects, fraud, or gross mistakes that amount to fraud.

(c) Except for warranty clauses in construction contracts, warranty clauses shall provide that the

warranty applies notwithstanding inspection and acceptance or other clauses or terms of the

contract.

Parent topic: Subpart 46.7 - Warranties
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. 3:04cr5/MCR

LARRY DION HAMMOND, 

 Defendant.

O R D E R

The defendant filed a motion for leave to conduct discovery materials (doc. 194).

He seeks discovery in order to be able to present a meritorious claim in a § 2255 motion

regarding jury selection procedures. The government has not filed a response in

opposition to the motion. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

If it wishes to oppose the motion, the government shall file its response within twenty

days from the date of this order. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of October, 2007.

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:04-cr-00005-MCR-MD Document 197 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 1
COURTROOM DEPUTY’S MINUTES MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/INITIAL APPEARANCE DATE: February 21, 2007

 BOND HEARING

 DETENTION HEARING Digital Recording 2:40 - 3:00

 PRELIMINARY (EXAMINATION)(HEARING)

 REMOVAL HEARING (R.40)

/ARRAIGNMENT

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE: Susan Russ Walker DEPUTY CLERK: Joyce Taylor

CASE NO. 2:06cr169-WHA DEFENDANT NAME: James Earl Hubbard

AUSA: Clark Morris DEFT. ATTY: William Blanchard

Type Counsel: ( )Retained; (/ ) CJA; ( ) Waived; ( ) FPD

USPO/USPTS: Sandra Wood

Interpreter needed: ( / ) NO; ( )YES Name:

____________________________________________________________________________

/ Date of Arrest February 20, 2007 or  Arrest Rule 40

/ Deft First Appearance. Advised of rights/charges.  Prob/Sup Rel Violator

/ Financial Affidavit executed. ORAL MOTION for appointment of Counsel.

/ ORAL ORDER appointing CJA Panel Attorney William Blanchard - Notice of

Appearance to be filed

 Panel Attorney Appointed;  to be appointed - prepare voucher

 Deft. Advises he will retain counsel. Has retained _____________________

  Government’s ORAL Motion for Detention Hrg.  to be followed by written

motion;  Government’s WRITTEN Motion for Detention Hrg. filed

 Detention Hearing  held; set for

 ORDER OF TEMPORARY DETENTION PENDING HEARING to be entered

 ORDER OF DETENTION HEARING PENDING TRIAL to be entered

/ Release order entered. Deft advised of conditions of release

/ / BOND EXECUTED (M/D AL charges) $25,000.00. Deft released

 BOND EXECUTED (R. 40) - deft to report to originating district as ordered

 Bond not executed. Defendant to remain in Marshal’s custody

 Deft. ORDERED REMOVED to originating district

 Waiver of  preliminary hearing;  Waiver Rule 40 hearing

 Court finds PROBABLE CAUSE. Defendant bound over to the Grand Jury

/ ARRAIGNMENT - Plea of NOT GUILTY entered. 

DISCOVERY DISCLOSURE DATE: March 2, 2007

/ CRIMINAL TERM: June 4, 2007

 NOTICE to retained Criminal Defense Attorney handed to counsel

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 56 Filed 02/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 58.152 General identification.

All commercial bulk packages or consumer packaged product containing dairy products manufactured under the provisions of this subpart shall comply with the applicable regulation of the Food and Drug Administration.