alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**ANNUAL
        STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE**
 **OFFICER'S
        CERTIFICATE**
 
 RE:
          J.P.
          Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., Commercial Mortgage
          Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-LDP8.
   In
          accordance with Section 11.09 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (the
          “Agreement”) dated September 1, 2006, executed by and between J.P. Morgan Chase
          Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., (as “Depositor”), Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
          (as “Master Servicer No. 1“), Midland Loan Services, Inc., (as "Master Servicer
          No. 2"), J.E. Robert Company, Inc., (as “Special Servicer”), and LaSalle Bank
          National Association, (as "Trustee" and “Paying Agent"), as authorized officer
          of the Master Servicer I certify that (A) a review of the activities of
          the
          Master Servicer during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof and
          of the
          performance of the Master Servicer under this Agreement has been made under
          such
          officer’s supervision and (B) to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on
          such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under
          this
          Agreement in all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof,
          or,
          if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
          respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature
          and
          status thereof.
  Wells
        Fargo Bank, National Association
 “Master
        Servicer No. 1"
  /s/
        James
        B. Scanlon
  James
        B.
        Scanlon
 Vice
        President
 Wells
        Fargo Bank National Association
 
 March
        2007 -753
II 

Calendar No. 567 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2719 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ‘‘Earl D. Hutto 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mr. NELSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

AUGUST 1, 2006 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ‘‘Earl D. Hutto Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EARL D. HUTTO POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1400 West Jordan Street in PenVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:17 Aug 02, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2719.RS S2719

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2719 RS

1 sacola, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Earl D. Hutto Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Earl D. Hutto Post 

7 Office Building’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Calendar No. 567 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2719 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. Pensacola, Florida, as the ‘‘Earl D. Hutto Post al Service located at 1400 West Jordan Street in 

AUGUST 1, 2006 

Reported without amendment 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
# 52.222-17 	[Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.222 [Reserved]
# 52.214-30 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.214 [Reserved]
# 52.233 [Reserved]

- 52.233-1 Disputes. 
- 52.233-2 Service of Protest. 
- 52.233-3 Protest after Award. 
- 52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of

The State of Connecticut and

Capitol District Energy Center

Cogeneration Associates

)

)

)

)

)

)

Trading Agreement and Order No. 8249

Modification No.3

Whereas, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Capitol District

Energy Center Cogeneration Associates CRespondent") having agreed to the terms and conditions

set forth in Trading Agreement and Order No. 8249 and all previous modification thereto, do now,

by mutual agreement, further modify said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

1. All references to May 1, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions

reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to

comply with the emissions limits of Subsections 22a-174-22(d)(l) through 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies ("Regulations") are

hereby replaced with May 1, 20 IO.

2. Any references to October 1st with respect to the date by which the Respondent shall

estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits CDERCs") and/or

allowances for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1, 2009.

3. Any references to May 31,2007 and May 31,2008 with respect to calculation and

retirement of non-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31, 2009 and May 31,

2010.

4. All references to September 1,2008 with respect to the submission of Future

Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September 1,2009.

5. No later than May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading

Agreement and Order No. 8249 and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent

shall comply with the requirements of Sections 22a-174-22(d)(l) and 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations.

6. All other terms and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order No. 8249, as modified,

shall remain in effect.

(Printed on Recycled Paper)

79 Elm Street • Hartford, CT 06106-5127

www.ct.gov/dep

All Equal Opportunity Employer
Capitol District Energy Center

Cogeneration Associates

2 Trading Agreement and

Order No. 8249

Modification NO.3

The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement

and Order without further notice.

Capitol District Energy Center Cogeneration Associates

Signature: ~4L;".

Name: /"Za:."j [. 6.,.,:('

Title: !CwT ;tt,><-AJ'-c

Date: <f- 1"3 - /;/9

Issued as a modification of a Trading Agreement and Order.

G Ro ~------'-==-- A.4

Di ctor

Engineering and Enforcement Division

Bureau of Air Management

Date

. "" -t-
(April 14, 1980)

#### Howard Barschi, Appellant, v Esther Euben, as Executrix of Henry Euben, Deceased, Respondent.

In an action for an accounting, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 5, 1978, which, *inter alia,*denied plaintiff’s motion to set aside the court’s decision after trial as being against the weight of the evidence, and (2) a judgment of the same court, dated September 7, 1978, which dismissed the complaint for failure to establish the existence of a partnership, relegated plaintiff to a plenary action at law regarding any possible claims for sums due, and dismissed defendant’s counterclaims. Appeal from order dated September 5, 1978 dismissed *(Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgment affirmed. Defendant is awarded one bill of costs. In our opinion the decision of the trial court dismissing the complaint for failure to establish the existence of a partnership is supported by the record. The inference of the existence of a partnership, which arises from a sharing of the profits of a business, was overcome by ample evidence indicating that plaintiff received his share of the profits in return for services rendered as an employee of the companies (see Partnership Law, § 11, subd 4, par [b]). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 3:21cv83-MCR-EMT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JOHNNIE LEE DIRDEN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:21cv83-MCR-EMT

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________/

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on January 

29, 2021. ECF No. 3. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:21cv83-MCR-EMT

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) 

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

1. This matter is REMANDED to the state court from which it was 

removed. 

2. The clerk of court is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of March 2021.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# 52.235 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
# 52.232 [Reserved]

- 52.232-1 Payments. 
- 52.232-2 Payments under Fixed-Price Research and Development Contracts. 
- 52.232-3 Payments under Personal Services Contracts. 
- 52.232-4 Payments under Transportation Contracts and Transportation-Related Services Contracts. 
- 52.232-5 Payments under Fixed-Price Construction Contracts. 
- 52.232-6 Payment under Communication Service Contracts with Common Carriers. 
- 52.232-7 Payments under Time-and-Materials and Labor-Hour Contracts. 
- 52.232-8 Discounts for Prompt Payment. 
- 52.232-9 Limitation on Withholding of Payments. 
- 52.232-10 Payments under Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer Contracts. 
- 52.232-11 Extras. 
- 52.232-12 Advance Payments. 
- 52.232-13 Notice of Progress Payments. 
- 52.232-14 Notice of Availability of Progress Payments Exclusively for Small Business Concerns. 
- 52.232-15 Progress Payments Not Included. 
- 52.232-16 Progress Payments. 
- 52.232-17 Interest. 
- 52.232-18 Availability of Funds. 
- 52.232-19 Availability of Funds for the Next Fiscal Year. 
- 52.232-20 Limitation of Cost. 
- 52.232-21 [Reserved] 
- 52.232-22 Limitation of Funds. 
- 52.232-23 Assignment of Claims. 
- 52.232-24 Prohibition of Assignment of Claims. 
- 52.232-25 Prompt Payment. 
- 52.232-26 Prompt Payment for Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer Contracts. 
- 52.232-27 Prompt Payment for Construction Contracts. 
- 52.232-28 Invitation to Propose Performance-Based Payments. 
- 52.232-29 Terms for Financing of Purchases of Commercial Products and Commercial Services. 
- 52.232-30 Installment Payments for Commercial Products and Commercial Services. 
- 52.232-31 Invitation to Propose Financing Terms. 
- 52.232-32 Performance-Based Payments. 
- 52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-System for Award Management. 
- 52.232-34 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-Other than System for Award Management. 
- 52.232-35 Designation of Office for Government Receipt of Electronic Funds Transfer Information. 
- 52.232-36 Payment by Third Party. 
- 52.232-37 Multiple Payment Arrangements. 
- 52.232-38 Submission of Electronic Funds Transfer Information with Offer. 
- 52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations. 
- 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
Exhibit 32.3





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Keyuan Petrochemicals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A2 for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Weifeng Xue, Vice President of Accounting of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.








Date:  October 15, 2010








/s/ Weifeng Xue___________


Weifeng Xue


Vice President of Accounting
#### § 51.3412 Unusable material.

“Unusable Material” consists of defective portions of potatoes, and potatoes which are frozen, affected by freezing injury, soft rot, wet breakdown, insects, worms, larvae, Blackheart, Late Blight Tuber Rot, Southern Bacterial Wilt, Bacterial Ring Rot, or which are seriously damaged by internal defects.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2728 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Red 185. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. CHAFEE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment 

Red 185. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT RED 185. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.32.26 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Pigment Red 185) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 2728 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2732 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2732

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 219.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2006

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 219.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 219.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.77      Pigment Yellow 219  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (provided for in                                                   31/2009
                         subheading
                         3204.17.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
52.246-25 Limitation of Liability-Services.

As prescribed in 46.805 , insert the following clause:

Limitation of Liability-Services (Feb 1997)

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this clause, and except to the extent that the

Contractor is expressly responsible under this contract for deficiencies in the services required to be

performed under it (including any materials furnished in conjunction with those services), the

Contractor shall not be liable for loss of or damage to property of the Government that-

(1) Occurs after Government acceptance of services performed under this contract; and

(2) Results from any defects or deficiencies in the services performed or materials furnished.

(b) The limitation of liability under paragraph (a) of this clause shall not apply when a defect or

deficiency in, or the Government’s acceptance of, services performed or materials furnished results

from willful misconduct or lack of good faith on the part of any of the Contractor’s managerial

personnel. The term "Contractor’s managerial personnel," as used in this clause, means the

Contractor’s directors, officers, and any of the Contractor’s managers, superintendents, or

equivalent representatives who have supervision or direction of-

(1) All or substantially all of the Contractor’s business;

(2) All or substantially all of the Contractor’s operations at any one plant, laboratory, or separate

location at which the contract is being performed; or

(3) A separate and complete major industrial operation connected with the performance of this

contract.

(c) If the Contractor carries insurance, or has established a reserve for self-insurance, covering

liability for loss or damage suffered by the Government through the Contractor’s performance of

services or furnishing of materials under this contract, the Contractor shall be liable to the

Government, to the extent of such insurance or reserve, for loss of or damage to property of the

Government occurring after Government acceptance of, and resulting from any defects and

deficiencies in, services performed or materials furnished under this contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.246 [Reserved]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
  By:
    
    /s/ James D. DonderoJames D. DonderoPresident (Principal Executive Officer)By:
    
    /s/ M. Jason BlackburnM. Jason BlackburnSecretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 52.6 How to make application.

An application for inspection service may be made to the office of inspection or to any inspector, at or nearest the place where the service is desired. An up-to-date list of the Inspection Field Offices of the Department may be obtained upon request to the Administrator. Satisfactory proof that the applicant is an interested party shall be furnished.
#### § 60.129 USDA.

*USDA* means the United States Department of Agriculture.
EX-34 (i)

(logo) ERNST & YOUNG

* Ernst & Young LLP
  220 South Sixth Street, Ste. 1400
  Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509

* Phone: (612) 343-1000
  www.ey.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S.
Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform (the Platform) as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122 (d)(1)(iii)
and 1122 (d)(4)(iv) through 1122 (d)(4)(xiv), which the Company has determined
are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the
servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with
the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than
all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the
Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the
Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected
transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the
servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2006, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated,
in all material respects.


/s/ Ernst & Young
February 26, 2007

A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
#### § 58.329 Color.

Coloring, when used shall be Annatto or any color which is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
#### Robert S. Hayward, Appellant, *v.*Frederick A. Conkling, Respondent.

(Argued June 13,1884 ;

decided June 24, 1884

*Henry E. Davies*for appellant.

*Samuel Hcmd*for respondent.

Agree to affirm order, and for judgment absolute against plaintiff on stipulation; no opinion.

All concur, except Bugeb, Oh. J., and Bapallo, J., dissenting.

Order affirmed, and judgment accordingly.
§ 633.5 Application procedures. ( a ) *Application for participation.* To apply for enrollment, a person must submit an application for participation in the WBP.
( b ) *Preliminary agency actions.* The NRCS must certify that the designated acreage that would be placed under an agreement constitutes a viable wetland unit, contains sufficient adjacent land to protect the wetland, and provides essential habitat for the nesting, breeding or feeding of migratory waterfowl.
( c ) Where funds allocated to the State do not permit accepting all requests which are filed, the State Conservationist, in consultation with the State Technical Committee, may establish ranking criteria and limit the approval of requests for agreements in accordance with the ranking scheme. Any ranking scheme shall consider estimated costs of the agreement, costs of protection, availability of matching funds, significance of wetland functions and values, and estimated success of protection measures.
( d ) The NRCS may place higher priority on certain geographic regions of the State where the protection of wetlands may better achieve NRCS State and regional goals and objectives.
( e ) Notwithstanding any limitation of this part, the State Conservationist may enroll eligible lands at any time in order to encompass total wetland areas subject to multiple ownership or otherwise to achieve program objectives. Similarly, the State Conservationist may, at any time, exclude otherwise eligible lands if the participation of the adjacent landowners is essential to the successful protection of the wetlands and those adjacent landowners are unwilling to participate.