alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 621.14 Recipient responsibility.

Leadership in arrangements for other needed Federal, State, and local agency participation is responsibility of the requesting agency. Consistent with national objectives and NRCS policy and procedures, the requesting agency has leadership responsibility for developing specific study objectives, providing the necessary study organization, and ensuring public participation in the planning process.
EX-10.1






NOTE




	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	May 11, 2009
	Maker:

	 	Claimsnet.com, Inc.
	Payee:

	 	National Financial Corporation
	Place for Payment:

	 	14860 Montfort Dr., Suite 250, Dallas, TX 75254
	Principal Amount:

	 	One Hundred Thousand U.S. dollars (USD$100,000.00)






Annual Interest Rate on Unpaid Principal from Date of Funding: Three percent (3%)



Terms of Payment: Principal and interest shall be due and payable on demand, interest being
calculated on the unpaid principal balance to the date of each installment paid, and the payment
made credited first to the discharge of interest accrued and the balance to the reduction of the
principal. Accrued and unpaid interest shall be computed on the basis of the actual days elapsed
in a year consisting of 365 days on the principal.



Annual Interest Rate on Demanded, Unpaid Amounts: The highest rate allowed by law.



Security for Payment: None



Maker promises to pay to the order of Payee at the place for payment and according to the
terms of payment the principal amount plus interest at the rates stated above. All unpaid amounts
shall be due upon demand.



On default in the payment of this note or in the performance of any obligation in any
instrument securing or collateral to it, this note and all obligations in all instruments securing
or collateral to it shall become immediately due at the election of Payee. Maker and each surety,
endorser, and guarantor waive all demands for payment, presentations for payment, notices of
intention to accelerate maturity, notices of acceleration of maturity, protest, and notices of
protest.



If this note or any instrument securing or collateral to it is given to an attorney for
collection or enforcement, or if suit is brought for collection or enforcement, or if it is
collected or enforced through probate, bankruptcy, or other judicial proceeding, then Maker shall
pay Payee reasonable attorney’s fees in addition to other amounts due. Reasonable attorney’s fees
shall be 10.0% of all amounts due unless either party pleads otherwise.



Nothing in this note shall authorize the collection of interest in excess of the highest rate
allowed by law.



Maker reserves the right to prepay the outstanding principal balance of this Note, in whole or
in part, at any time and from time to time, without premium or penalty. Any such pre-payment shall
be made together with payment of interest accrued on the amount of principal being prepaid through
the date of such prepayment, and shall be applied to the installments of principal due hereunder in
the inverse order of maturity.



Each Maker is responsible for the entire amount of this note.



The terms Maker and Payee and other nouns and pronouns include the plural if more than one.



Maker shall not be deemed to be in default of this note unless and until Maker shall have been
given seven (7) days written notice and opportunity to cure such default, via certified mail return
receipt requested.



Claimsnet.com, Inc.



By:  /s/ Don Crosbie



Don Crosbie, CEO



MAKER
Amendment to Employment Agreement, Marc D. Schorr



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Employment Agreement is by and between Marc D. Schorr
(“Employee”) and Wynn Resorts, Limited (“Employer”). 
 WHEREAS, Employee and Employer have entered in to that certain Employment
Agreement dated as of March 4, 2008, as amended (the “Employment Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, due to the ongoing negative economic climate,
Employee and Employer desire to amend the Employment Agreement in order to assist Employer to maintain business stability thereby preserving Employee’s employment. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Amendment to Base Salary. Effective February 16, 2009, the term “Base Salary” shall be mean $1,700,000 per annum. 

  

	 	2.	Other Provisions of Agreement. The parties acknowledge that the Employment Agreement is being modified only as stated herein, and agree that nothing else in the Employment
Agreement shall be affected by this Amendment. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed as of the date below. 
  

							
	WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED	 		 	EMPLOYEE
			
	 /s/ Matt Maddox
	 		 	 /s/ Marc D. Schorr
 Marc D. Schorr

				
	 By:
	 	 Matt Maddox
	 		 	 Date:  February 12, 2009

				
	 Its:
	 	 CFO & Treasurer
52.223-10 Waste Reduction Program.       As prescribed in 23.705(a), insert the following clause:          Waste Reduction Program (May 2011)                                       (a)                   *Definitions*. As used in this clause-                *Recycling* means the series of activities, including collection, separation, and processing, by which products or other materials are recovered from the solid waste stream for use in the form of raw materials in the manufacture of products other than fuel for producing heat or power by combustion.                *Waste prevention* means any change in the design, manufacturing, purchase, or use of materials or products (including packaging) to reduce their amount or toxicity before they are discarded. Waste prevention also refers to the reuse of products or materials.                *Waste reduction* means preventing or decreasing the amount of waste being generated through waste prevention, recycling, or purchasing recycled and environmentally preferable products.                                          (b) 						            Consistent with the requirements of section 3(e) of Executive Order 13423, the Contractor shall establish a program to promote cost-effective waste reduction in all operations and facilities covered by this contract. The Contractor’s programs shall comply with applicable Federal, State, and local requirements, specifically including Section 6002 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C.6962, *etseq*.) and implementing regulations (40 CFR Part 247).                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.223 [Reserved]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50543 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS ROCHA-NEGRETE, also known as Jose DeJesus Rocha-Negrete, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-01-CR-650-ALL

-------------------- February 20, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jesus Rocha-Negrete appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Rocha-Negrete complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). He argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional.No. 02-50543 -2- Alternatively, Rocha-Negrete contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Rocha-Negrete acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
§ 634.11 Availability of funds. ( a ) The provisions of the program are subject to the appropriation of funds by Congress to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
( b ) The allocation of funds to the administering agencies is to be made on the basis of the total funds needed to carry out the project.
( c ) The obligation of Federal funds for RCWP contracts with participants is to be made on the basis of the total contract costs.
23.506 Suspension of payments, termination

of contract, and debarment and suspension

actions.

(a) After determining in writing that adequate evidence to suspect any of the causes at paragraph (d)

of this section exists, the contracting officer may suspend contract payments in accordance with the

procedures at 32.503-6(a)(1).

(b) After determining in writing that any of the causes at paragraph (d) of this section exist, the

contracting officer may terminate the contract for default.

(c) Upon initiating action under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, the contracting officer shall refer

the case to the agency suspension and debarment official, in accordance with agency procedures,

pursuant to subpart 9.4.

(d) The specific causes for suspension of contract payments, termination of a contract for default, or

suspension and debarment are-

(1) The contractor has failed to comply with the requirements of the clause at 52.223-6, Drug-Free

Workplace; or

(2) The number of contractor employees convicted of violations of criminal drug statutes occurring

in the workplace indicates that the contractor has failed to make a good faith effort to provide a

drug-free workplace.

(e) A determination under this section to suspend contract payments, terminate a contract for

default, or debar or suspend a contractor may be waived by the agency head for a particular

contract, in accordance with agency procedures, only if such waiver is necessary to prevent a severe

disruption of the agency operation to the detriment of the Federal Government or the general public

(see subpart 9.4). The waiver authority of the agency head cannot be delegated.

Parent topic: Subpart 23.5 - Drug-Free Workplace
#### § 54.7 Order of furnishing service.

Service shall be furnished to applicants in the order in which requests are received. Preference will be given, when necessary, to requests made by any government agency or any regular user of the service, and to requests for appeal service under § 54.19.

[84 FR 48555, Sept. 16, 2019]
§ 51.2540 General. ( a ) Compliance with the provisions of these standards shall not excuse failure to comply with provisions of applicable Federal or State laws.
( b ) These standards are applicable to pistachio nuts in the shell which may be in a natural, dyed, raw, roasted, or salted state; or in any combination thereof. However, nuts of obviously dissimilar forms shall not be commingled.
§ 5001.509 Servicing fees. The lender may pass the servicing fees on to the borrower but may not delay payment of the fee to the Agency while collecting the payment from the borrower. ( a ) *Guarantee retention fees.* Where the lender is required to pay a periodic guarantee retention fee (see § 5001.455), the fee is due for the entire payment period even if the loan note guarantee is terminated or transferred before the next retention fee payment is due.
( b ) Borrower *transfer fee.* The Agency will charge the following fees: ( 1 ) A one-time, $1,500 nonrefundable transfer fee at the time of transfer to an eligible borrower.
( 2 ) Payment of a one-time nonrefundable transfer fee of 1 percent of the guaranteed loan balance to ineligible borrowers.
EX-33 (h)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Custody
1015 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55414


Appendix I


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the
period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006, for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the
Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The
Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria. In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth
by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of
Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the
Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By: /s/ Shari L. Gillund
Shari L. Gillund

Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: March 1, 2007
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TOSECTION 906**

**OF**

**THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)**

 

Theundersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of Video Display Corporation,certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2005 (the “Report”), whichaccompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Video Display Corporation at the dates and for the periodsindicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not berelied upon for any other purpose.

 
| This 15th day  of July, 2005 |   /s/ Gregory A. Kittle   |   |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   Gregory A. Kittle       |
|                         |   Chief Financial Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to Video DisplayCorporation and will be retained by Video Display Corporation and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Theinformation in this Exhibit 32.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, norshall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference insuch filing.

 

1

----
Exhibit 35.1

             ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.19

                       Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc.
           Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series ARSI 2006-M3

            Each of the undersigned does hereby certify that he/she is a duly
appointed Authorized Servicing Agent of Ameriquest Mortgage Company (the "Master
Servicer"), and further certify as follows:

            1. This certification is being made pursuant to the terms of the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2006 (the
"Agreement"), among Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc., as depositor, the
Master Servicer and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee.

            2. I have reviewed the activities of the Master Servicer during the
preceding year and the Master Servicer's performance under the Agreement and to
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout the year.

            Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set
forth in the Agreement.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of
March 26, 2007.


                                             By: /s/ Jane Johnson
                                                 -------------------------------
                                             Name: Jane Johnson
                                             Title: Authorized Servicing Agent


                                             By: /s/ Jule J. Keen
                                                 -------------------------------
                                             Name: Jule J. Keen
                                             Title: Executive Vice President and
                                                    Authorized Servicing Agent


      I, Denise Apicella, an Assistant Secretary of the Master Servicer, hereby
certify that each of Jane Johnson and Jule J. Keen is a duly qualified, and
acting Authorized Servicing Agent of the Master Servicer and that the signature
appearing above is his/her genuine signature.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of
March 26, 2007.


                                             By: /s/ Denise Apicella
                                                 -------------------------------
                                             Name: Denise Apicella
                                             Title: Assistant Secretary
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LADARIEN DARNELL MCWHORTER,

Petitioner,

v. 4:21cv10–WS/MJF

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 18) docketed June 24, 2022. The magistrate judge recommends that

Petitioner’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED. Petitioner has

filed objections (ECF No. 23) to the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation. 

The undersigned has reviewed the record in light of Petitioner’s objections

but finds no basis upon which to reject the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation. The undersigned agrees that Petitioner has failed to demonstrate

Case 4:21-cv-00010-WS-MJF Document 24 Filed 08/29/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

that he is entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 18) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 5), challenging

the judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Ladarien

McWhorter, Leon County Circuit Court Case No. 2012–CF–2221, is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of August , 2022.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:21-cv-00010-WS-MJF Document 24 Filed 08/29/22 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:98-cr-00019-MP-17

HARRY ALONSO,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1567, Motion to unseal the remainder of the

documents that remain under seal by Harry Alonso. Defendant Harry Alonso is currently facing

extradition proceedings before the City of Westminster Magistrates’ court in London, England.

Defendant’s previous cooperation with U.S. authorities has become relevant in his extradition

proceedings. The Court previously unsealed defendant’s motion for substantial assistance. 

Defendant moves the Court to temporarily unseal the remaining documents to allow their

inspection by counsel. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of requested documents to defendant’s

counsel.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of September, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
# 52.214-17 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.214 [Reserved]
# 46.313 Contracts for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.246-13, *Inspection*-Dismantling, Demolition, or Removal of Improvements, in *solicitations* and contracts for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 46.3 - Contract Clauses