T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L I S I T S A L AW C OR P OR AT I ON , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. U N I TED N A TI O N A L I N SU RA N CE C O M P A N Y , an u n k n o w n b u si n ess en t i ty, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 55700 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 9 - c v - 0 7 2 8 2 - O D WPL A ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia O t i s D . W r i ght , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J anuary7, 2013 ** P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: K O Z IN S K I, C h i ef Ju d g e, M cK E O W N an d M . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L i s i t s aL a w C orpor a t i on ( L i s i t s a ) appe a l s the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rgr a nt i ng sum m ary j ud gm enton behal f of U ni t ed N at i on al Insurance C om pany (U ni t ed 

# FI LED JAN 15 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

N at i on al ). B ec ause the part i es ar e f am i l i arw i th the fa ctual and p roce du ra l hi st ory of thi s c a s e , w e r e pe a tonl y thos e f a c t s ne c e s s a ryt o r e s ol ve the i s s ue s r a i s e d on ap p e a l . W e a f

f i rm. L i si t sacont ends thatU ni t ed N at i on al ’ s J anuary28 l ett erw as an offe r, w hi ch L i si t saac ce pt ed by i t s ow n l ett erof Janu ary 30. A cc ordi ng l y, L i si t sacl ai m s that U ni t e d N a t i ona l i s c ontr a c tua l l y obl i ga t e d t o pa yL i s i t s af ori t s s e rvi c e s de f

e ndi ng the E n ciso a c t i on. L i s i t s ai s m i s t a ke n. In order t o form a c on tra ctun der C al i forni a l aw , “ the t erm s propo se d i n an offe r m ustbe m etexac t l y, prec i se l y, and u nequ i vo ca l l y. ” S i eg el v. W a rn er B ro s. E ntm ’t , Inc. , 542 F . S upp. 2d 1098, 1137 ( C . D . C a l . 2008) ( c i t i ng P an ag otacos v. B an k of A m er i ca , 6 0 C al. A p p . 4 th 8 5 1 , 8 5 5 -5 6 (C al. C t. A p p . 1 9 9 8 )) . “ A qu al i fi ed ac ce pt ance const i tut es a r ej ec t i on t erm i nat i ng the ori gi nal offe r. ” I d. ( c i t i ng P anagotac os , 6 0 C a l. A p p . 4 th a t 8 5 5

– 5 6 ; G le nde MotorC o. v . Supe r i or C o u rt , 1 5 9 C a l. A p p . 3 d 3 8 9 , 3 9 6 ( C a l. C t. A p p . 1 9 8 4 ) ) ; see a l so C al . C i v. C od e § 15 85 (“ A n acc ept ance m ustbe absol ut e and un qu al i fi ed . . . . A qu al i fi ed a c c e p ta n c e is an e w p r o p o s a l.” ) . H er e, no contra ctform ed because L i si t sa ’ s purpo rt ed ac ce pt ance w as c ondi t i ona l . F ori ns t a nc e , L i s i t s a“ a c c e pt e d” the s e c ond of U ni t e d N a t i ona l ’ s e i ght p ro p o sal s “ on the c ondi t i on th a t y o u rc lie n t a n d th e c o u rt e n te rin to as tip u la tio n .”3

( E m pha s i s a dde d. ) T he di s tr i c tc ourtc orr e c t l yde t e rm i ne d tha t“ [ t ] he s e c ondi t i ons and q ual i fi ca t i on s t o [U ni t ed N at i on al ’ s] offe r do n otevi dence unq ual i fi ed ac ce pt ance . ” U ni t ed N at i on al ’ s pay m ent s t o L i si t saw hi l e the bad fai th act i on w as pend i ng do no tal t erthi s c on cl usi on . B ec ause U ni t ed N at i on al ’ s off erw as never ac ce pt ed, no contra ctw as form ed on w hi ch L i si t sacan rec ov er .

“ T he m e a s ur e of

r e c ove ry i n q u a n tu m m e r u it i s the r e a s onabl e va l ue of the se rvi ce s r endered, prov i ded they w er e of di re ctbenefi tt o the defendant . ” P alm er v . G r egg , 65 C al . 2d 65 7, 66 0 (C al . 19 67 ). “ T he i dea thaton e m ustbe benef i t ted by the goods a nd s e rvi c e s be s t ow e d i s thus i nt e gr a l t o r e c ove ryi n qua ntum m erui t . ” D ay v. A l ta B at es Medi cal C enter , 9 8 C a l. A p p . 4 th 2 4 3 , 2 4 9 ( C a l. C t. A pp. 2002) ( c i t i ng M

ag l i ca v. M

ag l i ca , 6 6 C a l. A p p . 4 th 4 4 2 , 4 4 9 - 5 0 ( C a l. C t. A p p . 1 9 9 8 ) ) . T he S upe r i orC ourtf

ound tha tU ni t e d N a t i ona l ne ve rha d adutyt o de f e nd or i nd em ni fythe E n ciso defe nd ant s bec ause the endo rs em ent s a dd i ng coverage w er e fr audu l ent l y obt ai ned. B ec ause U ni t ed N at i on al had n o d uty t o d ef end the E n ciso de f e nda nt s , L i s i t s a ’ s w ork on be ha l f of thos e de f

e nda nt s c onf

e rr e d no be ne f

i ton U ni t e d N a t i ona l . T hus , L i s i t s ai s note nt i t l e d t o r e c ove ri n q u a n tu m m e r u it . A FFI R M ED