UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934

                 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT


             For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14099


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
        (Exact Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in Its Charter)



         California                                              94-2940204
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the  registrant  was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  X   No ___

                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     Financial Statements


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                  June 30, 2004

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $ 18
   Receivables and deposits                                                      33
   Other assets                                                                 169
   Investment property:
      Land                                                    $ 916
      Buildings and related personal property                 10,594
                                                             11,510
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (6,324)         5,186

                                                                            $ 5,406
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 98
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           98
   Accrued property taxes                                                        59
   Other liabilities                                                            100
   Due to affiliates (Note B)                                                    21
   Mortgage note payable                                                      4,957

Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
   General partner                                             $ (2)
   Special limited partners                                      (79)
   Limited partners (181,300 units issued and
      outstanding)                                               154             73

                                                                            $ 5,406

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>




<PAGE>






                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          Three Months                 Six Months
                                         Ended June 30,              Ended June 30,
                                       2004          2003          2004          2003

Revenues:
<S>                                    <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>
   Rental income                       $ 403         $ 405         $ 830        $ 817
   Other income                            63            64           114          124
   Casualty gain (Note C)                   4            --             9           --
       Total revenues                     470           469           953          941

Expenses:
   Operating                              215           197           388          402
   General and administrative              46            25           100           51
   Depreciation                           117           121           234          240
   Interest                                99           102           198          205
   Property taxes                          29            39            59           78
       Total expenses                     506           484           979          976

Net loss                               $ (36)        $ (15)        $ (26)       $ (35)

Net loss allocated to
   general partner (0.2%)              $ --          $ --          $ --          $ --

Net loss allocated to
   limited partners (99.8%)               (36)          (15)          (26)         (35)

                                       $ (36)        $ (15)        $ (26)       $ (35)

Net loss per limited
   partnership unit                   $ (0.20)      $ (0.08)      $ (0.14)     $ (0.19)
Distributions per limited
   partnership unit                    $ --          $ --         $ 0.57         $ --

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>



<PAGE>




                      CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
     CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIENCY) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                    Limited                 Special
                                  Partnership    General    Limited   Limited
                                     Units       Partner   Partners   Partners     Total

<S>                                 <C>            <C>       <C>      <C>         <C>
Original capital contributions      181,808        $ 1       $ --     $45,452     $45,453

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at December 31, 2003             181,300       $ (2)      $ (75)    $ 283       $ 206

Distributions paid to partners           --          --         (4)      (103)       (107)

Net loss for the six months
   ended June 30, 2004                   --          --         --        (26)        (26)

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at June 30, 2004                 181,300       $ (2)      $ (79)    $ 154       $ 73

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>



                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Six Months Ended
                                                                        June 30,
                                                                    2004      2003
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>
  Net loss                                                       $ (26)       $ (35)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided
   by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                   234          240
     Amortization of loan costs                                       3            3
     Casualty gain                                                   (9)          --
     Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                       (7)          (4)
      Other assets                                                  (45)         (24)
      Accounts payable                                              (40)         (13)
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                            --            9
      Accrued property taxes                                        (65)         (63)
      Other liabilities                                              58            6
      Due to affiliates                                             (67)          17
         Net cash provided by operating activities                   36          136

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (101)        (119)
  Insurance proceeds received                                        16           --
         Net cash used in investing activities                      (85)        (119)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                 (69)         (76)
  Distributions paid to partners                                   (107)          --
         Net cash used in financing activities                     (176)         (76)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                          (225)         (59)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    243          178
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                        $ 18        $ 119

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                         $ 162        $ 201
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:
  Property improvements and replacements included in
   accounts payable                                               $ 59        $ --

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying  unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements of Consolidated
Capital  Properties VI (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial  statements.  In the opinion of ConCap  Equities,  Inc.  ("CEI" or the
"General  Partner"),  all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating
results for the three and six months  ended June 30, 2004,  are not  necessarily
indicative  of the  results  that may be  expected  for the fiscal  year  ending
December 31, 2004. For further information,  refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's  Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. The General  Partner is
an  affiliate  of Apartment  Investment  and  Management  Company  ("AIMCO"),  a
publicly traded real estate investment trust.

Note B - Related Party Transactions

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership.

Affiliates of the General  Partner are entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts
from  the  Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$46,000  and  $48,000  for  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2004  and  2003,
respectively, which is included in operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of  the  General  Partner  earned  reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $63,000 and $25,000 for the
six months  ended June 30,  2004 and 2003,  respectively,  which is  included in
general and  administrative  expenses.  Approximately  $21,000 of these expenses
remained unpaid as of June 30, 2004 and are included in due to affiliates.

The Partnership Agreement also provides for a special management fee equal to 9%
of the total  distributions  made from operations to the Limited  Partners to be
paid  to  the  General  Partner  for  executive  and  administrative  management
services.  The General Partner earned approximately $9,000 during the six months
ended June 30, 2004 which is included in general and administrative expenses. No
such fee was  earned for the six  months  ended  June 30,  2003 as there were no
operating distributions.

The  Partnership  insures its  property up to certain  limits  through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability.  The Partnership  insures its property above the AIMCO limits through
insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the General
Partner. During the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, the Partnership was
charged  by  AIMCO  and  its  affiliates   approximately  $14,000  and  $21,000,
respectively,  for  insurance  coverage and fees  associated  with policy claims
administration.

Note C - Casualty Event

The  casualty  gain is related  to a pipe bomb  explosion  in January  2004 that
damaged 16  electrical  meters and  exterior  siding.  No  apartment  units were
damaged.  A casualty gain of approximately  $9,000 was recognized during the six
months  ended  June 30,  2004 due to the  receipt  of  approximately  $16,000 in
insurance  proceeds,  net  of  the  write  off  of  undepreciated  property  and
improvements of approximately $7,000.

Note D - Contingencies

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purported to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships  (including the Partnership) that are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time,  affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief,  including judicial
dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a
complaint (the "Heller  action") was filed against the same  defendants that are
named in the Nuanes action,  captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or
about August 6, 2001,  plaintiffs  filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller
action was brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserted claims for,
among other things,  breach of fiduciary duty, unfair  competition,  conversion,
unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make at least
one round of tender offers to purchase all of the  partnership  interests in the
Partnerships within one year of final approval, if it is granted, and to provide
partners  with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The
proposed  settlement  also provided for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs
which the General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector")  filed an  appeal  seeking  to  vacate  and/or  reverse  the  order
approving the settlement and entering  judgment  thereto.  On November 24, 2003,
the Objector filed an  application  requesting the Court order AIMCO to withdraw
settlement  tender offers it had  commenced,  refrain from making further offers
pending the appeal and auction any units tendered to third  parties,  contending
that the offers did not conform  with the terms of the  Settlement.  Counsel for
the Objector (on behalf of another  investor)  had  alternatively  requested the
Court take certain  action  purportedly  to enforce the terms of the  settlement
agreement.  On December 18, 2003,  the Court heard oral  argument on the motions
and denied them both in their entirety.

On January 28, 2004,  Objector filed his opening brief in his pending appeal. On
April 23, 2004, the General Partner and its affiliates filed a response brief in
support of the settlement and the judgment thereto. Plaintiffs have also filed a
brief in support of the settlement.  On June 4, 2004,  Objector filed a reply to
the briefs submitted by the General Partner and Plaintiffs.  No hearing has been
scheduled in the matter.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs, associated with this case will be material to
the Partnership's overall operations.

On August 8, 2003 AIMCO  Properties  L.P., an affiliate of the General  Partner,
was served with a complaint in the United  States  District  Court,  District of
Columbia alleging that AIMCO Properties L.P.  willfully  violated the Fair Labor
Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to pay  maintenance  workers  overtime for all
hours worked in excess of forty per week. On March 5, 2004  Plaintiffs  filed an
amended complaint also naming NHP Management Company, which is also an affiliate
of the General Partner. The complaint is styled as a Collective Action under the
FLSA and seeks to certify state  subclasses  in  California,  Maryland,  and the
District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties
L.P. failed to compensate  maintenance  workers for time that they were required
to be "on-call".  Additionally,  the complaint  alleges  AIMCO  Properties  L.P.
failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time that
they worked in responding to a call while  "on-call".  The defendants have filed
an answer to the amended  complaint  denying the substantive  allegations.  Some
discovery has taken place and  settlement  negotiations  continue.  Although the
outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties,  L.P. does not believe
that the ultimate  outcome will have a material  adverse effect on its financial
condition  or results of  operations  taken as a whole.  Similarly,  the General
Partner does not believe that the ultimate  outcome will have a material adverse
effect on the Partnership's  financial  condition or results of operations taken
as a whole.

The  Partnership  is unaware  of any other  pending  or  outstanding  litigation
matters  involving  it or its  investment  properties  that are not of a routine
nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

As  previously  disclosed,  the  Central  Regional  Office of the United  States
Securities and Exchange  Commission is conducting an  investigation  relating to
certain  matters.  AIMCO  believes the areas of  investigation  include  AIMCO's
miscalculated   monthly  net  rental  income  figures  in  third  quarter  2003,
forecasted  guidance,  accounts payable,  rent concessions,  vendor rebates, and
capitalization of expenses and payroll.  AIMCO is cooperating  fully. AIMCO does
not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its
consolidated  financial  condition  or results of  operations  taken as a whole.
Similarly,  the General Partner does not believe that the ultimate  outcome will
have a  material  adverse  effect on the  Partnership's  consolidated  financial
condition or results of operations taken as a whole.


<PAGE>

ITEM 2.     Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending   claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes  and   possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment property consists of one apartment complex, Colony
of Springdale Apartments, located in Springdale, Ohio. The average occupancy for
the six  month  periods  ended  June  30,  2004  and  2003,  was  91%  and  90%,
respectively.

The  Partnership's  financial  results  are  dependent  upon a number of factors
including  the  ability  to  attract  and  maintain  tenants  at the  investment
property,  interest  rates on  mortgage  loans,  costs  incurred  to operate the
investment  property,  general economic  conditions and weather.  As part of the
ongoing  business  plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner  monitors the
rental market  environment of its investment  property to assess the feasibility
of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing  occupancy levels and protecting
the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of this plan, the General
Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related
increases  in  expenses  by  increasing  rents and  maintaining  a high  overall
occupancy  level.  However,  the General Partner may use rental  concessions and
rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions, accordingly, there
is no  guarantee  that the General  Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.
Further,  a number of factors  which are outside the control of the  Partnership
such as the local  economic  climate  and weather can  adversely  or  positively
impact the Partnership's financial results.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 was
approximately  $36,000 and $26,000 compared to net loss of approximately $15,000
and $35,000 for the  corresponding  periods in 2003.  Net loss increased for the
three months  ended June 30, 2004 as a result of an increase in total  expenses.
Total revenues remained  relatively constant for the three months ended June 30,
2004.  Net loss  decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as a result of
an increase in total revenues partially offset by an increase in total expenses.

Total  expenses  increased  for the six  months  ended  June 30,  2004 due to an
increase in general and administrative expenses partially offset by decreases in
operating  and property tax  expenses.  Total  expenses  increased for the three
months  ended June 30,  2004 due to  increases  in  operating  and  general  and
administrative  expenses partially offset by a decrease in property tax expense.
Operating expense decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due
to a decrease in maintenance  expense.  The decrease in maintenance expenses was
primarily due to a decrease in contract  services.  Operating expenses increased
for the three  months  ended  June 30,  2004  primarily  due to an  increase  in
property  expenses  resulting  from  an  increase  in  utility  expenses  at the
Partnership's  property.  Property tax expense  decreased for both the three and
six months  ended June 30, 2004 due to a decrease in the  assessed  value of the
property.

General and administrative expenses increased for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2004  primarily due to an increase in the cost of services  included in
the  management  reimbursements  to the  General  Partner as  allowed  under the
Partnership  Agreement.  The increase  during the six months ended June 30, 2004
was also due to an increase in the special management fees earned by the General
Partner for executive and administration  management services.  The fee is equal
to 9% of the total  distributions  made from operations to the Limited Partners.
Also included in general and  administrative  expenses at June 30, 2004 and 2003
are costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors
and  regulatory  agencies  and the  annual  audit  required  by the  Partnership
Agreement.

The  increase  in total  revenues  for the six months  ended  June 30,  2004 was
primarily  due to an increase in rental income and a casualty gain (as discussed
below),  partially offset by a decrease in other income. Rental income increased
primarily  due to an increase in  occupancy  and a decrease in bad debt  expense
partially  offset by a decrease in average  rental rates at Colony of Springdale
Apartments.  Other income decreased  primarily due to a decrease in late charges
at the Partnership's property.

The  casualty  gain is related  to a pipe bomb  explosion  in January  2004 that
damaged 16  electrical  meters and  exterior  siding.  No  apartment  units were
damaged.  A casualty gain of approximately  $9,000 was recognized during the six
months  ended  June 30,  2004 due to the  receipt  of  approximately  $16,000 in
insurance  proceeds,  net  of  the  write  off  of  undepreciated  property  and
improvements of approximately $7,000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2004, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$18,000  compared  to  approximately  $119,000 at June 30,  2003.  Cash and cash
equivalents  decreased by approximately  $225,000 since December 31, 2003 due to
approximately  $85,000 and  $176,000  of cash used in  investing  and  financing
activities,  respectively,  partially  offset by  approximately  $36,000 of cash
provided by operating activities. Cash used in investing activities consisted of
property  improvements and replacements  partially offset by insurance  proceeds
received. Cash used in financing activities consisted of principal payments made
on the mortgage encumbering the Partnership's property and distributions paid to
partners.  The  Partnership  invests  its working  capital  reserves in interest
bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal,  state,
and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  General  Partner  monitors
developments in the area of legal and regulatory  compliance.  For example,  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests  additional  compliance measures
with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these
changes,  the Partnership  expects that it will incur higher expenses related to
compliance,  including  increased  legal and audit  fees.  Capital  improvements
planned for the Partnership's property are detailed below.

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2004,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately   $160,000  of  capital   improvements  at  Colony  of  Springdale
Apartments,  consisting primarily of roof, floor covering, air conditioning unit
and appliance replacements and structural improvements.  These improvements were
funded  from  operating  cash  flow.  The  Partnership   evaluates  the  capital
improvement  needs of the  property  during  the year and  currently  expects to
complete an additional $51,000 in capital  improvements  during the remainder of
2004.  Additional capital  improvements may be considered and will depend on the
physical  condition  of the  property  as  well  as the  anticipated  cash  flow
generated by the property.


<PAGE>



The  Partnership's  assets are thought to be sufficient  for any near term needs
(exclusive  of  capital   improvements)   of  the   Partnership.   The  mortgage
indebtedness  encumbering the Partnership's property of approximately $4,957,000
matures in November  2019 at which time the  mortgage is  scheduled  to be fully
amortized.

The Partnership  distributed  the following  amounts during the six months ended
June 30, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands, except per unit data):

                   Six months        Per           Six months          Per
                     Ended         Limited           Ended           Limited
                    June 30,     Partnership        June 30,       Partnership
                      2004          Unit              2003             Unit

   Operations         $107         $  0.57          $   --             $   --

The  Partnership's  cash  available  for  distribution  is reviewed on a monthly
basis. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated
from  operations,  the  availability of cash reserves and the timing of the debt
maturity,  refinancing,  and/or sale of the property.  There can be no assurance
that the  Partnership  will  generate  sufficient  funds from  operations  after
required capital expenditures to permit further distributions to its partners in
2004 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 101,828 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 56.17% of the outstanding Units at
June 30, 2004. A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender offers
made by AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is possible  that AIMCO or its  affiliates
will acquire  additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and
units in AIMCO  Properties,  L.P., the operating  partnership  of AIMCO,  either
through  private  purchases  or  tender  offers.  Pursuant  to  the  Partnership
Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take
action with  respect to a variety of matters that  include,  but are not limited
to,  voting on certain  amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove  the  General  Partner.  As a result  of its  ownership  of 56.17% of the
outstanding  Units,  AIMCO and its  affiliates  are in a position to control all
voting decisions with respect to the  Partnership.  Although the General Partner
owes fiduciary duties to the limited  partners of the  Partnership,  the General
Partner  also  owes  fiduciary  duties  to AIMCO as its sole  stockholder.  As a
result,  the  duties  of  the  General  Partner,  as  general  partner,  to  the
Partnership  and its limited  partners may come into conflict with the duties of
the General Partner to AIMCO, its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The  investment  property is recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's  investment  property.  These factors include, but are not limited
to,  changes  in the  national,  regional  and  local  economic  climate;  local
conditions,  such as an oversupply of multifamily  properties;  competition from
other available  multifamily property owners and changes in market rental rates.
Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnership's
assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized monthly as it is earned. The
Partnership  evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an
allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than
30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.
The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or
in response to heavy  competition from other similar  complexes in the area. Any
concessions  given at the inception of the lease are amortized  over the life of
the lease.

ITEM 3.     Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.

<PAGE>

                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purported to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships  (including the Partnership) that are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time,  affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief,  including judicial
dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a
complaint (the "Heller  action") was filed against the same  defendants that are
named in the Nuanes action,  captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or
about August 6, 2001,  plaintiffs  filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller
action was brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserted claims for,
among other things,  breach of fiduciary duty, unfair  competition,  conversion,
unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make at least
one round of tender offers to purchase all of the  partnership  interests in the
Partnerships within one year of final approval, if it is granted, and to provide
partners  with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The
proposed  settlement  also provided for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs
which the General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector")  filed an  appeal  seeking  to  vacate  and/or  reverse  the  order
approving the settlement and entering  judgment  thereto.  On November 24, 2003,
the Objector filed an  application  requesting the Court order AIMCO to withdraw
settlement  tender offers it had  commenced,  refrain from making further offers
pending the appeal and auction any units tendered to third  parties,  contending
that the offers did not conform  with the terms of the  Settlement.  Counsel for
the Objector (on behalf of another  investor)  had  alternatively  requested the
Court take certain  action  purportedly  to enforce the terms of the  settlement
agreement.  On December 18, 2003,  the Court heard oral  argument on the motions
and denied them both in their entirety.

<PAGE>

On January 28, 2004,  Objector filed his opening brief in his pending appeal. On
April 23, 2004, the General Partner and its affiliates filed a response brief in
support of the settlement and the judgment thereto. Plaintiffs have also filed a
brief in support of the settlement.  On June 4, 2004,  Objector filed a reply to
the briefs submitted by the General Partner and Plaintiffs.  No hearing has been
scheduled in the matter.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs, associated with this case will be material to
the Partnership's overall operations.

On August 8, 2003 AIMCO  Properties  L.P., an affiliate of the General  Partner,
was served with a complaint in the United  States  District  Court,  District of
Columbia alleging that AIMCO Properties L.P.  willfully  violated the Fair Labor
Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to pay  maintenance  workers  overtime for all
hours worked in excess of forty per week. On March 5, 2004  Plaintiffs  filed an
amended complaint also naming NHP Management Company, which is also an affiliate
of the General Partner. The complaint is styled as a Collective Action under the
FLSA and seeks to certify state  subclasses  in  California,  Maryland,  and the
District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties
L.P. failed to compensate  maintenance  workers for time that they were required
to be "on-call".  Additionally,  the complaint  alleges  AIMCO  Properties  L.P.
failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time that
they worked in responding to a call while  "on-call".  The defendants have filed
an answer to the amended  complaint  denying the substantive  allegations.  Some
discovery has taken place and  settlement  negotiations  continue.  Although the
outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties,  L.P. does not believe
that the ultimate  outcome will have a material  adverse effect on its financial
condition  or results of  operations  taken as a whole.  Similarly,  the General
Partner does not believe that the ultimate  outcome will have a material adverse
effect on the Partnership's  financial  condition or results of operations taken
as a whole.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a) Exhibits:

                  See attached Exhibit Index

            b) Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended June 30, 2004.


<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI


                                    By:   CONCAP EQUITIES, INC.
                                          General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                           Stephen B. Waters
                                           Vice President


                                    Date: August 12, 2004


<PAGE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                                  EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit Number    Description of Exhibit


       2.1        Agreement and Plan of Merger,  dated as of October 1, 1998, by
                  and between AIMCO and IPT incorporated by reference to Exhibit
                  2.1 filed  with the  Registrant's  Current  Report on Form 8-K
                  dated October 1, 1998.

       3.1        Certificate of Limited Partnership,  incorporated by reference
                  to the Registration  Statement of Registrant filed October 22,
                  1984, as amended to date.

       3.2        Agreement of Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to
                  the  Registration  Statement of  Registrant  filed October 22,
                  1984, as amended to date.

      10.22       Multi-family  note between  Colony of  Springdale  Associates,
                  Ltd. and GMAC Commercial  Mortgage  Corporation  dated October
                  25, 1999.  (Incorporated  by reference to the Annual Report on
                  Form 10-K dated December 31, 1999.)

      31.1        Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Executive  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      31.2        Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Financial  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      32.1        Certification   Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
                  Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
                  of 2002.



<PAGE>


Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION
I, Martha L. Long, certify that:

1.    I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Consolidated
      Capital Properties VI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this
      report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the small business issuer and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
            made  known to us by  others  within  those  entities,  particularly
            during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
            disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
            conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
            on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
            internal  control over financial  reporting that occurred during the
            small  business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the small
            business  issuer's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual
            report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
            materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
      disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
      committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
            ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report   financial
            information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees who have a significant  role in the small  business
            issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2004

                                    /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Martha L. Long
                                    Senior  Vice   President  of  ConCap
                                    Equities,  Inc.,  equivalent  of the
                                    chief   executive   officer  of  the
                                    Partnership


<PAGE>


Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION
I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.    I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Consolidated
      Capital Properties VI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this
      report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the small business issuer and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
            made  known to us by  others  within  those  entities,  particularly
            during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
            disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
            conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
            on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
            internal  control over financial  reporting that occurred during the
            small  business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the small
            business  issuer's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual
            report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
            materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
      disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
      committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
            ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report   financial
            information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees who have a significant  role in the small  business
            issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2004

                                    /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                    Stephen B. Waters
                                    Vice    President    of    ConCap
                                    Equities,   Inc.,  equivalent  of
                                    the chief  financial  officer  of
                                    the Partnership


<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated  Capital
Properties VI (the "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive  officer of
the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Name:  Martha L. Long
                                    Date:  August 12, 2004


                                           /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                    Name:  Stephen B. Waters
                                    Date:  August 12, 2004



This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.