TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00529-CR

Reginald Williams, Appellant 

v. 

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 299TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-DC-21-904023, THE HONORABLE KAREN SAGE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted appellant Reginald Williams of the offense of murder and 

assessed punishment at 25 years’ imprisonment. See Tex. Penal Code § 19.02. The district court

sentenced Williams in accordance with the jury’s verdict. This appeal followed. 

Williams’s court-appointed counsel on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and 

a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). The brief meets the 

requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why 

there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See id. at 744-45; see also Penson v. Ohio, 

488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). 

Counsel has certified to this Court that he has provided Williams with a copy of the motion and 

brief, advised him of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and 

supplied him with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 
2

436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). No pro se brief or other response has 

been filed.

Upon receiving an Anders brief, we must conduct a full examination of the record 

to determine whether the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Penson, 488 U.S. at 80; Bledsoe 

v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 

511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The indictment alleged in three paragraphs that on or about 

October 13, 2019, Williams either (1) intentionally or knowingly caused the death of Emmett 

Infante Ramos by shooting him with a firearm; (2) committed an act clearly dangerous to human 

life, with intent to cause serious bodily injury, that caused the death of Ramos by shooting him 

with a firearm; or (3) committed or attempted to commit the offense of robbery and, in the course 

of and in furtherance of and in immediate flight from the commission of that offense, committed

an act clearly dangerous to human life that caused the death of Ramos by shooting him with a 

firearm. See Tex. Penal Code § 19.02(b)(1), (2), (3).

The jury heard evidence that Ramos was killed during a drug deal. Ramos’s 

girlfriend, Deisy Calderon, testified that Ramos had arranged to sell THC cartridges to a buyer 

on the night that he was killed. Ramos and Calderon drove to the location specified by the buyer

and, upon arrival at that location, Ramos got out of the car and walked to the back of the vehicle

with the cartridges. Calderon remained inside the car and heard male voices outside. Shortly 

thereafter, Calderon heard Ramos say, “Chill, chill” in a loud and scared voice as he walked to 

the front of the car and opened the driver’s side door. Calderon looked up from her phone, saw 

“like a flash” and heard “a shot go off,” and saw “two bodies,” one “bigger than the other,”

immediately behind Ramos. The two individuals “took off running” while Ramos fell to the 

ground, telling Calderon that he had been shot and asking her to call the police. Calderon called 
3

911, and the police and paramedics arrived shortly thereafter. Ramos was transported to a 

hospital, where he died. The cause of death was a gunshot wound to Ramos’s back.

During the investigation into the shooting, police searched Ramos’s phone and 

determined that the person to whom Ramos had arranged to sell the THC cartridges was Elijah 

Malone. Text messages between Ramos and Malone, in which they discussed the sale of the 

cartridges, were admitted into evidence. The last text message between them was at 11:53 p.m. 

on the night that Ramos was killed. Approximately four minutes later, Calderon called 911. 

Police executed a search warrant at the apartment where Malone lived. Inside his room, they 

found “five unopened Rove THC cartridges in [] rectangular boxes.” Rove was the brand of 

cartridges that Calderon testified Ramos had in his possession that night.

Police interviewed Malone’s then-girlfriend, Dejza Zeigler, who told them that 

Malone was with Reginald Williams when she picked him up the day after the shooting. At trial, 

Zeigler testified that she had picked Malone up at the apartment where “Reggie’s baby momma”

lived. That woman was identified as Jayla Sifuentes, who testified that Williams and Malone 

were “chilling” at her apartment the night of the shooting and that they left her apartment

together at the same time, sometime after 11:00 p.m., without telling her where they were going. 

Sifuentes testified that they returned to her apartment later that night, with Malone “running 

through [the] door” first and “breathing heavily” and Williams coming through the door shortly 

thereafter, also “breathing heavy” and looking “shocked, too, like he just wasn’t there.” She also 

testified that Malone and Williams were holding THC cartridges when they returned to her 

apartment and that they told her that they had robbed someone during a drug deal. Sifuentes 

recounted that Malone and Williams slept at her apartment that night and that Malone’s 

girlfriend picked him up the next day.
4

Later during the investigation, the police arrested Williams and searched the 

residence where he lived. During the search, officers discovered additional THC cartridges that 

matched the description of those that Ramos had in his possession when he was shot. Other 

evidence admitted at trial included surveillance camera footage taken from an auto shop near the

location of the shooting that showed two men, matching the physical descriptions of Malone and 

Williams, walking in the direction of where the crime occurred and then, several minutes later,

running away in the opposite direction; a copy of the search history from Williams’s cell phone,

which showed that on the day of the shooting, he had been searching for information on firearms 

that might have been used during the shooting;

1 and a copy of a news article found on 

Williams’s phone related to the shooting and other searches on his phone for an “update on 

deadly shooting [A]ustin,” made in the days immediately after the shooting, before Williams was 

arrested.

At the conclusion of trial, the district court charged the jury on the law related to

the offense of murder, including instructions on the law of parties. The court’s charge tracked 

the allegations in the indictment, and the jury found Williams guilty of murder as charged. 

Following a hearing on punishment, at which witnesses for both the State and the defense 

testified, the jury assessed punishment at 25 years’ imprisonment, and the district court 

sentenced Williams accordingly as noted above.

 

1 The police were unable to locate or identify the actual firearm that was used to 

shoot Ramos.
5

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with counsel that the 

appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support 

the appeal. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment of conviction.

__________________________________________

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith

Affirmed

Filed: June 30, 2023

Do Not Publish