alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 52.219 [Reserved]

- 52.219-1 Small Business Program Representations. 
- 52.219-2 Equal Low Bids. 
- 52.219-3 Notice of HUBZone Set-Aside or Sole-Source Award. 
- 52.219-4 Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns. 
- 52.219-5 [Reserved] 
- 52.219-6 Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside. 
- 52.219-7 Notice of Partial Small Business Set-Aside. 
- 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns. 
- 52.219-9 Small Business Subcontracting Plan. 
- 52.219-10 Incentive Subcontracting Program. 
- 52.219-11 Special 8(a) Contract Conditions. 
- 52.219-12 Special 8(a) Subcontract Conditions. 
- 52.219-13 Notice of Set-Aside of Orders. 
- 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting. 
- 52.219-15 [Reserved] 
- 52.219-16 Liquidated Damages-Subcontracting Plan. 
- 52.219-17 Section 8(a) Award. 
- 52.219-18 Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Participants. 
- 52.219-19 [Reserved] 
- 52.219-20 [Reserved] 
- 52.219-21 [Reserved] 
- 52.219-22 [Reserved] 
- 52.219-23 [Reserved] 
- 52.219-24 [Reserved] 
- 52.219-25 [Reserved] 
- 52.219-26 [Reserved] 
- 52.219-27 Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole-Source Award to, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Concerns Eligible Under the SDVOSB Program. 
- 52.219-28 Post-Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation. 
- 52.219-29 Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole-Source Award to, Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business Concerns. 
- 52.219-30 Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole-Source Award to, Women-Owned Small Business Concerns Eligible Under the Women-Owned Small Business Program. 
- 52.219-31 Notice of Small Business Reserve. 
- 52.219-32 Orders Issued Directly Under Small Business Reserves 
- 52.219-33 Nonmanufacturer Rule. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with this Amendment No. 3 to the Transition Report of China Internet Café Holdings Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Dishan Guo, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification
is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



|Dated:  August 17, 2012 | By: | /s/ Dishan Guo                                                                                                                          
|----------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Dishan Guo
        Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
        (principal executive officer & principal financial officer)
Page
                Twenty Six





**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Statement
      of Chief Financial  Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.**§
**1350**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
      ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as the chief financial officer
      of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
                R. Alan MillerR.
                Alan MillerChief  Financial
                OfficerAugust
                10, 2007
#### § 60.101 Act.

*Act* means the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 *et seq.*).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 Wednesday, December 1, 2010; 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

# PLACE:

 Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS:

 Closed to the Public.

## Matter To Be Considered:

### Compliance Status Report

The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of compliance matters.

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: November 19, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-29830 Filed 11-22-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
52.203-3 Gratuities.       As prescribed in 3.202, insert the following clause:          Gratuities (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            The right of the Contractor to proceed may be terminated by written notice if, after notice and hearing, the agency head or a designee determines that the Contractor, its agent, or another representative-                                                         (1) 								                Offered or gave a gratuity (*e.g.,* an entertainment or gift) to an officer, official, or employee of the Government; and                                                            (2) 								                Intended, by the gratuity, to obtain a contract or favorable treatment under a contract.                                                                             (b) 						            The facts supporting this determination may be reviewed by any court having lawful jurisdiction.                                          (c) 						            If this contract is terminated under paragraph (a) of this clause, the Government is entitled-                                                         (1) 								                To pursue the same remedies as in a breach of the contract; and                                                            (2) 								                In addition to any other damages provided by law, to exemplary damages of not less than 3 nor more than 10 times the cost incurred by the Contractor in giving gratuities to the person concerned, as determined by the agency head or a designee. (This paragraph (c)(2) is applicable only if this contract uses money appropriated to the Department of Defense.)                                                                             (d) 						            The rights and remedies of the Government provided in this clause shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this contract.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.203 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MARK MEAD,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:21-cv-12-MW/MJF

CENTER STATE RAILROAD SERVICES 

INC,

Defendant.

___________________________/

AMENDED JUDGMENT

The parties are ordered to comply with their settlement agreement. All 

claims in this case are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 41.

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS,

CLERK OF COURT

March 11, 2021 s/ Jeremy Wright

DATE Deputy Clerk

Case 5:21-cv-00012-MW-MJF Document 11 Filed 03/11/21 Page 1 of 1
52.208 [Reserved]

52.208-1 [Reserved]

52.208-2 [Reserved]

52.208-3 [Reserved]

52.208-4 Vehicle Lease Payments.

52.208-5 Condition of Leased Vehicles.

52.208-6 Marking of Leased Vehicles.

52.208-7 Tagging of Leased Vehicles.

52.208-8 [Reserved]

52.208-9 Contractor Use of Mandatory Sources of Supply or Services.

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
# L_2013302EN.01001401.xml

| 13.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 302/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 302/14

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1129/2013

of 7 November 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Fal Oyster (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Fal Oyster’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Fal Oyster’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Fal Oyster’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Fal Oyster’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 November 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 384, 13.12.2012, p. 17.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.7.   Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom

UNITED KINGDOM

Fal Oyster (PDO)

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 4:01-cr-00042-SPM-AK

JOSE MIKEL SMITH,

Defendant.

___________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 42, Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, by

Jose Mikel Smith. Defendant maintains that he should be resentenced pursuant to Booker

because “his sentence exceeds the maximum authorized by the jury’s verdict alone.” Doc. 42,

Memorandum at 4.

Following its decision in Blakely v. Washington, which involved the constitutionality of

state sentencing guidelines, the United States Supreme Court determined that Blakely applies to

the Federal Sentencing Guidelines as well. United States v. Booker, ____ U.S. ____, 124 S.Ct.

2519, 159 L.Ed. 2d 442 (2204). However, the Eleventh Circuit has determined that Booker is

not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review, as “Booker’s constitutional rule falls

squarely under the category of new rules of criminal procedure that do not apply retroactively to

§ 2255 cases on collateral review.” Varela v. United States, 400 F.3d 864, 868 (11th Cir. 2005).

Case 4:01-cr-00042-RS-AK Document 43 Filed 11/21/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:01-cr-00042-SPM-AK

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That Defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2255, Doc. 42, be DENIED.

IN CHAMBERS at Gainesville, Florida, this 21st day of November, 2005.

s/A. Kornblum

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations

within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may

respond to another party’s objections within 10 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure

to file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

 

Case 4:01-cr-00042-RS-AK Document 43 Filed 11/21/05 Page 2 of 2
#### § 654.10 Operation and maintenance agreement.

A duly authorized official of the sponsor(s) must execute an O&M agreement with NRCS prior to NRCS furnishing financial assistance.
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.440 Standards governing prior approval for a proposed transfer of Control. The Agency's approval of a proposed transfer of Control is contingent upon full disclosure of the real parties in interest, the source of funds for the new owners' interest, and other data requested by the Agency. As a condition of approving a proposed transfer of control, the Agency may: ( a ) Require an increase in your Regulatory Capital;
( b ) Require the new owners or the transferee's Control Person(s) to assume, in writing, personal liability for your Leverage, effective only in the event of their direct or indirect participation in any transfer of Control not approved by the Agency; or
( c ) Require compliance with any other conditions set by the Agency, including compliance with the requirements for minimum capital and management-ownership diversity in effect at such time for new RBICs.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20D0393. THOMAS MANNAPSO v. ROBYN LYNN GLARNER.

Thomas Mannapso filed this application for discretionary appeal from the trial

court’s February 12, 2020, order denying a motion to set aside.1 Mannapso filed a

motion to withdraw the discretionary application, which is hereby GRANTED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 Mannapso filed both an application for discretionary appeal and a direct

appeal in the Supreme Court, which transferred the matters to this Court. See Case

Nos. S20A1139 and S20D1178, transferred May 18, 2020.

June 23, 2020

06/23/2020
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2687 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2687

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to stabilize the amount 
                    of the Medicare part B premium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2006

  Ms. Stabenow (for herself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to stabilize the amount 
                    of the Medicare part B premium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keep the Promise of Medicare Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. STABILIZATION OF MEDICARE PART B PREMIUM.

    Section 1839(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395r(a)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``Notwithstanding the preceding sentences, the monthly 
premium rate determined under this paragraph for each month in 2007 may 
not exceed an amount equal to the monthly premium rate determined under 
this paragraph for each month in 2006 adjusted by the percentage change 
in the average Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical 
Workers (CPI-W) for the third quarter of 2005 to the third quarter of 
2006.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 58.426 Rindless cheese wrapping equipment.

The equipment used to heat seal the wrapper applied to rindless cheese shall have square interior corners, reasonably smooth interior surface and have controls that shall provide uniform pressure and heat equally to all surfaces. The equipment used to apply shrinkable wrapping material to rindless cheese shall operate to maintain the natural intended shape of the cheese in an acceptable manner, reasonably smooth surfaces on the cheese and tightly adhere the wrapper to the surface of the cheese.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sentosa Financial Investments, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report'), I, William Tay, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

February 9, 2007


/s/ William Tay, President
------------------------------------
William Tay,
Principal Executive Officer &
Principal Financial Officer
52.232-2 Payments under Fixed-Price Research and Development Contracts.       As prescribed in 32.111(a)(2), insert the following clause, as appropriately modified with respect to payment due dates in accordance with agency regulations, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price research and development contract is contemplated:          Payments under Fixed-Price Research and Development Contracts (Apr 1984)          The Government shall pay the Contractor, upon submission of proper invoices or vouchers, the prices stipulated in this contract for work delivered or rendered and accepted, less any deductions provided in this contract. Unless otherwise specified, payment shall be made upon acceptance of any portion of the work delivered or rendered for which a price is separately stated in the contract.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.232 [Reserved]
#### ROSENBERG, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Samuel Rosenberg against the New York City - Railway Company.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Stephen Sol Sadacca for Admission to the Bar.

Application for admission to the Bar denied. The applicant has failed to comply with all requirements as to residence in New York (CPLR 9406; Rules of the Court of Appeals for Admission of Attorneys and Counselórsat-Law, rule II; 22 NYCRR Part 521). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### ITC Limited et al., Appellants, v Punchgini, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Submitted October 15, 2007;

decided October 18, 2007

Motion by American Intellectual Property Law Association for leave to appear amicus curiae on consideration of the certified question herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
#### § 623.14 Easement modifications.

After the easement has been perfected, no change will be made in the easement without a written request by the participant and the written consent of the Chief. Approval may be granted to achieve the goals of EWRP or facilitate the practical administration and management of the easement area or the program and the approval will not adversely affect the functions and values for which the easement was established. A modified easement shall be perfected in accordance with State law and NRCS superior interest shall be reserved by the landowner in accordance with §§ 623.7 and 623.11(a)(3).