Exhibit 34  a) [PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LOGO] PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  10 Tenth Street, Northwest Suite 1400  Atlanta, G4 30303-3351  Telephone (678)419 1000  Facsimile (678) 419 1239  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of  Assurant, Inc.: We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with I 122(d)(2)(vi) and II22(d)(4)(xi) of Regulation AS Servicing Criteria, that American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc., collectively the "Asserting Party') complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all mortgage loan-tracking transactions for which the Asserting Party served as a Vendor on behalf of Servicers for such asset-backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform', as of December 31, 2005 and for the year then ended, excluding (i) criteria 1122(d)(l)(i) through 1122 (d)(1)iv), 1122(d)(2)(i) through 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) through 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122((4)(i) through 1122(d)(4)(x) and I 122(d)(4)(xii through 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Asserting Party has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by It with respect to the Platform and (ii), criterion 1122(d)(4)(xii), which relates to servicing activities that are applicable to the Platform, big are excluded from the scope of management's assertion and are not reported on herein. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.  Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset- backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  In our opinion, management's assertion that the Asserting Party complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31. 2006 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  Atlanta, Georgia  February 23, 2007  Exhibit 34 b) [Ernst & Young logo] Earnst & Young LLP Suite 3300 Phone: (720) 931-4000 370 17th Street Fax:  (720) 931-4444 Denver, Colorado 80202-5663 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform Board of Directors Aurora Loan Services LLC We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (the "Management Certification"), that Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Company"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Bank FSB, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential mortgage loan master servicing compliance platform (the "Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform"), as defined in the Management Certification, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(l)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv) through 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the Regulation AB 1122 Master Servicing Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects . /s/ Ernst & Young LLP March 13, 2007 Exhibit 34  c) PriceWaterhouseCoopers PriceWaterhouseCoopers Suite 1800 2001 Ross Ave. Dallas, TX 75201-2997 Telephone:  214-999-1400 Facsimile:  214-754-7991 www.pwc.com Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors of The First American Corporation:  We have examined First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P.'s (the `Company" and an indirect subsidiary of The First American Corporation), compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item I1(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for an loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company salved as the residential tax service provider (the Platform) described In the accompanying Report on 4ssessment or Compliance, as of December 3l, 2006 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(l)(1-(iii), 1122(d)(2i)-{iv), 1122(d)(3)(i-iv), ll22(d)(4)(I)-(x), 1122(d)(4)(x) and 1122(d)(4)(iv)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by It with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for theCompany's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion On the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United Stales) and accordingly, included examining, on a fest basis, evidence about The Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that nay have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our examination disclosed The following material instance of noncompliance with the servicing criteria set forth in item 1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of Regulation AB applicable to the company during year ended December 31, 2006. Account reconciliations for all asset-backed securities related bank accounts were not prepared within 30 calendar days after the bank statement cutoff date, or such other number of days specified In the transaction agreements as required by item 1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of Regulation AB. In our opinion except for the material Instance of noncompliance described In the preceding paragraph, First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, LP. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended Oecemberal,2006 for all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the residential tax service provider, in all material respects.  /s/  PriceWaterhouseCoopers February 28, 2007  Exhibit 34  d) Deloitte  Deloitte & Touche LLP  Two World Financial Center  New York, NY 10281.1414  USA  Tel: +1 212436 2000  Fax: +1212 436 5000  www.deloitte.comReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  Home Loan Services, Inc.:  We have examined Home Loan Services, Inc.'s (the "Company's") compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the loans serviced by the Company that were first and second lien residential mortgage loans sold in public securitizations closed during December 2004, and calendar years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006 (the `Platform") described in Management's Certification Regarding Comp liance with Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation AB Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria 1122(d) 1 (iii) 1122 (d) (3) (I) C; and 1122 (d) 4 (ii), (xi), and (xii) which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Appendix A to management's certification identifies the individual asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.  Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our examination disclosed material noncompliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria applicable to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2006, as follows:  Item:  Description of material noncomp liance:  1122 (d)(4)(x) A  For a sample of 60 loans with escrow accounts, 5 escrow accounts were not analyzed within a 12 month period.  1122 (d)(4)(x) C  For a sample of 60 loans with escrow accounts, escrow finds were not returned within 30 days after payoff for 2 loans.  1122 (d)(I)(i)  The Company had not instituted policies and procedures to monitor any performance or other triggers in accordance with the transaction agreements.  In our opinion, except for the material noncompliance described in the preceding paragraph, the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 3 I, 2006 for the Platform, in all material respects.  March 1, 2007 /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Exhibit 34  e) HLB Gross Collins, P.C. Certified Public Accountants and Consultants  INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT To the Board of Directors of OfficeTiger Global Real Estate Services, Inc. Atlanta, GA  We have examined the Credit Risk Manager (CRM) Reports prepared by OfficeTiger Global Real Estate Services, Inc. (OfficeTiger) for year ended December 31, 2006.  OfficeTiger prepared these reports as required per the following trust Agreements: Trust Agreement Dated 6/1/06 for Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-FF10  Trust Agreement Dated 8/1/06 for Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-FF12  Trust Agreement Dated 9/1/06 for Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-FF14  Trust Agreement Dated 10/1/06 for Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-FF15  Trust Agreement Dated 11/1/06 for Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-FF17 * * Revised February 23, 2007 by Lehman Brothers outside council OfficeTiger Company's management is responsible for the preparation and distribution of the Credit Risk Manager (CRM) Reports. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the proper compliance with the relevant servicing criteria and the proper  preparation and distribution of the Credit Risk Manager (CRM) Reports prepared by OfficeTiger, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the reports referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, compliance with the relevant servicing criteria and the proper preparation and distribution of the Credit Risk Manager (CRM) Reports prepared by OfficeTiger for year ended December 31, 2006 based on the criteria contained in the five Trust Agreements referenced above and the applicable service criteria set forth in section 1122(d)(3)(i) of Regulation AB. /s/ HLB Gross Collins, P.C. Atlanta, Georgia February 26, 2007 Exhibit 34  f) **KPMG****KPMG LLP**    1601 Market Street      Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Members  Regulus Group LLC: We have examined management's assessment for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item I122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Regulus Group LLC has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria, Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.  Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.  /s/ KPMG LLPPhiladelphia, PA  February 22, 2007  KPMG LLP. a U S limited liability partnership, is the US  member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative Exhibit 34  g) [Ernst & Young LLP  LOGO]  Ernst & Young LLP Phone: (612) 343-1000 2 South Sixth Street, Ste. 1400  www.ey.comMinneapolis, MN 55402-4509  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122 (d)(1)(iii) and 1122 (d)(4)(iv) through 1122 (d)(4)(xiv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.  Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servic ing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP  February 26, 2007  A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global