alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[107th Congress Private Law 2]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl002.107]

Private Law 107-2
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 For the relief of retired Sergeant First Class James D. Benoit and Wan 
            Sook Benoit. <<NOTE: Oct. 1, 2002 -  [S. 1834]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT TO PAY CLAIMS.

    (a) Payment Required.--The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized 
and directed to pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, to James D. Benoit and Wan Sook Benoit, jointly, the sum 
of $415,000, in full satisfaction of all claims described in subsection 
(b), such amount having been determined by the United States Court of 
Federal Claims as being equitably due the said James D. Benoit and Wan 
Sook Benoit pursuant to a referral of the matter to that court by Senate 
Resolution 129, 105th Congress, 1st session, for action in accordance 
with sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code.
    (b) <<NOTE: Applicability. David Benoit.>>  Covered Claims.--
Subsection (a) applies with respect to all claims of the said James D. 
Benoit, Wan Sook Benoit, and the estate of David Benoit against the 
United States for compensation and damages for the wrongful death of 
David Benoit, the minor child of the said James D. Benoit and Wan Sook 
Benoit, pain and suffering of the said David Benoit, loss of the love 
and companionship of the said David Benoit by the said James D. Benoit 
and Wan Sook Benoit, and the wrongful retention of remains of the said 
David Benoit, all resulting from a fall sustained by the said David 
Benoit, on June 28, 1983, from an upper level window while occupying 
military family housing supplied by the Army in Seoul, Korea.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES.

    No part of the amount appropriated by section 1 in excess of 10 
percent thereof shall be paid or delivered to or received by any agent 
or attorney on account of services rendered in connection with this 
claim, any contract to the contrary notwithstanding. Violation of the 
provisions of this section is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to 
exceed $1,000.
```
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS25165 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 21





                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Jurisdiction of
                Name                                                 Incorporation
 ----------------------------------                                  -------------
<S>                                                                  <C>
Mark VII Transportation Company, Inc.                                Delaware

   Subsidiaries of Mark VII Transportation Company, Inc.:

     Mark VII Trucking, Inc.                                         Delaware

     Taurus Trucking, Inc.                                           Kansas

     Orion Express, Inc.                                             Kansas

       Subsidiary of Orion Express, Inc.:

         Mark VII Canada, ULC                                        Nova Scotia, Canada

     Mark VII Worldwide Logistics, Inc.                              Kansas

Mark VII Logistics, S.A. de C.V.                                     Mexico

MNX Carriers, Inc.                                                   Delaware            .

</TABLE>
exv10w2







	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT TO

G&K SERVICES EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





     This Amendment to G&K Services Executive Employment Agreement is entered into as of the close
of business on May 7, 2009 (the “Effective Time”) and amends that Executive Employment
Agreement by and between G&K Services, Inc. (“G&K Services”) and Jeffrey L. Wright
(“Executive”), dated as of November 16, 2007 and as amended as of April 10, 2009 (the
“Employment Agreement”).



INTRODUCTION



A. Executive has been employed by G&K Services as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, pursuant to the Employment Agreement.



B. G&K Services desires to promote Executive to the position of Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, appoint Executive to the Board of Directors of G&K Services and award Executive
additional compensation in connection with such promotion and appointment, subject to the
additional terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.




AMENDMENT




     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts recited above, and the parties’ mutual
undertakings, G&K Services and Executive agree to the following:



     1. As of the Effective Time, Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended
by deleting the second sentence of said section and inserting in lieu thereof the following:



     “Executive will serve in the capacity of Employer’s Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, or such other comparable senior leadership positions as
determined by Employer.”



     2. As of the Effective Time, Section 4.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended
by adding the following sentence at the end of said section:




“Immediately upon termination of Executive’s employment with Employer for any
reason, Executive will submit a written resignation from all positions then held by
him as a director or officer of Employer and of any subsidiary, parent or affiliated
entity of Employer, such resignations to be effective as of the Date of
Termination.”



     3. The capitalized terms used in this Amendment not defined herein shall have the meanings set
forth in the Employment Agreement. Except as expressly amended and restated herein, the Employment
Agreement, as hereby amended, remains in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered as of
the 7th day of May, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 
	EMPLOYER        	G&K SERVICES, INC.

 	 
	 	/s/ Jacquelyn T. Punch
 	 
	 	By Jacquelyn T. Punch 	 
	 	SVP, HR 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	EXECUTIVE 	/s/ Jeffrey L. Wright
 	 
	 	Jeffrey L. Wright
D. Chard employment letter modifications





Summary of Modifications to Dan Chard's
Employment Letter  




On May 26, 2006, the Company entered
into an employment letter agreement with Dan Chard, the Company's Executive Vice
President, Distributor Success. Pursuant to the letter agreement, Mr. Chard's base
salary was set at $300,000, effective February 13, 2006. The letter agreement also
provided for $25,000 increases in February 2007 and 2008. On February 13, 2009, our
Compensation Committee approved an additional $25,000 increase in Mr. Chard's base salary
to $375,000, effective February 16, 2009.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Angeles Partners XIV 1998 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in 
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000759859
<NAME> ANGELES PARTNERS XIV
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998   
<CASH>                                             835
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      357
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          31,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,664)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,699   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         34,081     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (27,015)    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,699    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,740    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,227    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,101    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,487)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  7,979
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,492     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   146.44<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 35.2**

**SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE**

Re: Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Master Trust Deed dated March 14, 1998 and the Supplementary Terms Notice dated September 19, 2006 between, among others, St.George Bank Limited ABN 92 055 513 070, Crusade Management Limited ABN 90 072 715 916 (the “**Manager**”) and Perpetual Trustees Consolidated Limited ABN 42 000 001 007 (collectively, the “**Agreements**”).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

|   | 1. | I, Gregory M. Bartlett, am an authorised officer of the Manager. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | A review of the Manager’s activities during the period from October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007 (the “**Reporting Period**”), and of its performance under the Agreements has been made under my supervision. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Manager has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date:  17 December 2007

|  /s/ Gregory M. Bartlett |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|

Gregory M. Bartlett

Director

Crusade Management Limited
52.226-4 Notice of Disaster or Emergency Area Set-Aside.       As prescribed in 26.206(b), insert the following clause:          Notice of Disaster or Emergency Area set-Aside (Nov 2007)                                       (a)                   *Set-aside area.* Offers are solicited only from businesses residing or primarily doing business in ________________________________________________ [*Contracting Officer to fill in with definite geographic boundaries.*] Offers received from other businesses shall not be considered.                                          (b) 						            This set-aside is in addition to any small business set-aside contained in this contract.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.226 [Reserved]
#### Harriet Rossman, as Administratrix of the Estate of Samuel Rossman, Deceased, Respondent, v. Joseph La Grega, Defendant, and Tobias Cohen et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering, defendants Cohen appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 12, 1968, which resolved the issue of liability in favor of plaintiff against said defendants, upon a jury verdict after a trial limited to that issue. Interlocutory judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed. On the evening of January 21, 1965, at about 8:00 p.M., appellant Tobias Cohen was driving plaintiff’s decedent home from.work. While on the Prospect Expressway, driving east, the front left tire of the car belonging to Cohen’s wife went flat. He then pulled over from the center lane, in which he had been riding, into the right-hand lane and stopped the car in that lane, a few feet east of the Fifth Avenue overpass. He did not drive onto the paved eight-foot wide shoulder which was used for disabled vehicles. Before leaving the car to call for assistance, but after discussing the matter with the decedent, Cohen asked the decedent to stand in the roadway next to the left front door to wave traffic away from the car. When Cohen had gotten about halfway to the telephone, he heard the screech of brakes. Turning around he saw defendant La Grega’s car swerving and wobbling. It made an almost 90-degree turn from the center lane and struck the decedent, pinning him against Cohen’s car and killing him. Cohen could not recall whether or not the rear lights on his car were lit at the time of the accident. Photographs taken at the time of the occurrence show the lights were not on. Although the investigating police officers made no note of it in their reports, they believed the lights were on. Conditions on the roadway evidenced light traffic, a clear night and good visibility, a well-lit area, and a slightly wet pavement. In our opinion, the actions of the decedent were so reckless and disregardful of his own safety as to constitute contributory negligence as a matter of law, particularly because there is no other hypothesis by which he may be exculpated *(Crough*v. *New York Cent. R. R. Co.,*260 N. Y. 227). The rescue doctrine is inapplicable under these facts. The decedent was not attempting to rescue anyone or anything and his actions lacked the element of spontaneous impulse and inspiration, a sudden emergency, upon which the rescuer’s exemption is based *(Cooper*v. *Teter,*123 W. Va. 372). Whereas in *Orwat*v. *Smetansky*(22 N Y 2d 869) there were facts which a jury could consider as efforts by the plaintiffs to exercise due care (the use of a warning light mounted on the vehicle and a flashlight by the man who was assigned to wave traffic by and who did not stand in the roadway), making the question of contributory negligence one of fact for the jury, here none of these circumstances are present. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
32.207 Administration and payment of commercial financing payments.       (a)                   *Responsibility.* The contracting officer responsible for administration of the contract shall be responsible for review and approval of contract financing requests.                                          (b)                   *Approval of financing requests.* Unless otherwise provided in agency regulations, or by agreement with the appropriate payment official-                                                         (1) 								                The contracting officer shall be responsible for receiving, approving, and transmitting all contract financing requests to the appropriate payment office; and                                                            (2) 								                Each approval shall specify the amount to be paid, necessary contractual information, and the account(s) (see 32.206(d)) to be charged for the payment.                                                                             (c)                   *Management of security.* After contract award, the contracting officer responsible for approving requests for financing payments shall be responsible for determining that the security continues to be adequate. If the contractor’s financial condition is the Government’s security, this contracting officer is also responsible for monitoring the contractor’s financial condition.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 32.2 - Commercial Product and Commercial Service Purchase Financing
ALASKA SEAFOOD CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2013-0652

DCN: 00050CBI

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            1872
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        9
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1885
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              112
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1885
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    28
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    45
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (18)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (18)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (18)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bond Laboratories, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Wilson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By /s/ John Wilson


John Wilson


Chief Executive Officer, President


April 15, 2010
```

[107th Congress Public Law 270]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ270.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 1754]]

Public Law 107-270
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   1895 Avenida Del Oro in Oceanside, California, as the ``Ronald C. 
 Packard Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 30, 2002 -  [H.R. 4794]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1895 
Avenida Del Oro in Oceanside, California, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Ronald C. Packard Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ronald C. Packard Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved October 30, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4794:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            June 18, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 17, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 63.7 Fund.

*Fund* means the NSIIC Revolving Fund established in the United States Department of the Treasury that is available to the NSIIC without fiscal year limitation, to carry out the programs and activities authorized under the Act.
36.504 Physical data.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-4, Physical Data, in solicitations and

contracts when a fixed-price construction contract is contemplated and physical data (e.g., test

borings, hydrographic data, weather conditions data) will be furnished or made available to offerors.

Parent topic: Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
11.801 Preaward in-use evaluation.

Supplies may be evaluated under comparable in-use conditions without a further test plan, provided

offerors are so advised in the solicitation. The results of such tests or demonstrations may be used to

rate the proposal, to determine technical acceptability, or otherwise to evaluate the proposal (see

15.305).

Parent topic: Subpart 11.8 - Testing
#### § 5001.120 [Reserved]
52.211-14 Notice of Priority Rating for

National Defense, Emergency Preparedness,

and Energy Program Use.

As prescribed in 11.604(a), insert the following provision:

Notice of Priority Rating for National Defense, Emergency Preparedness, and Energy Program Use

(Apr 2008)

Any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation will be □ DX rated order; □ DO rated order

certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use under the Defense

Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) (15 CFR700), and the Contractor will be required to follow

all of the requirements of this regulation. [Contracting Officer check appropriate box.]

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.211 [Reserved]