alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/Address
Date reissued4481F
JFJ Freight Forwarders Inc., 13100 NW. 113th Avenue Road, Medley, FL 33178
September 9, 2010.019779N
Francisca Envios Inc., 1749 NW. 21st Terrance, Miami, FL 33142
October 16, 2010.020178N
LCL Shipping USA, Inc., dba Cargo Planet Logistics, 625 West Victoria Street, Compton, CA 90220
October 15, 2010.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 2010-29711 Filed 11-24-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
| **Search****|****Firearms area            of the ATF Web site****|****Site Map**

**Youth Crime Gun Interdiction Initiative**
**Cities**
**Firearms****Core areas**
Youth Crime        Gun Interdiction Initiative

**Please click on a city to the left to view its section of the        report. You can        also click on the cover page (below) to download the entire report (1.7 MB). There is a        table of contents for the complete version. All items are in PDF format. To view them, You        need the Adobe Acrobat        Viewer.**

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Complete        Report)
Forward by the Director of Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
- Introduction  Terms Used in this ReportTrace Analysis Provided in This Report
- General Findings: Local Illegal Firearms Markets  Methods of Illegal Tranfer of Firearms to Juveniles and Other Prohibited PersonsEnforcement Oppotunities for Preventing Trafficking in Firearms
- Update: Comprehensive Community Crime Gun Tracing  Update: Local Law Enforcement InitiativesFuture Developments
- Information for Law Enforcement Executives  Technical NotesAcknowledgments
Arson and Explosives area
**Search****|****Bureau of        Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms home page****|****Site Map** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals. 

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number:

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/29/2015 10:55:43 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/29/2015 10:55:43 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Do cket Number FAA - 2013 - 0627
Exhibit 

32.2 

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Entremetrix Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George Lefevre, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated:			August 15, 2005                       | By:/s/ George Lefevre                                  |
|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  
George Lefevre, Chief Financial Officer |
Appendix C: Estimation of Upper-bound Aquatic Exposure 

GENEEC2 input parameters for Rozol Prairie Dog Bait application

Property Value Source Comment 

Solubility 34 ppm 1998 RED 

Hydrolysis Stable MRID 42205501 At pH 5, 7, and 9 

Photolysis in Water 90 min (half-life) MRID 42205502 

Photodegradation on 

Soil 

4 days (half-life) MRID 42452301 

Aerobic Soil 

Degradation 

65 days (half-life) MRID 43159801 Calculated using 

input parameter 

guidance (EPA 

2009) 

Kads 126 ml/g MRID 42666001 Determined using 

input parameter 

guidance (EPA 

2009) 

Koc 35,400 ml/g MRID 42666001 Determined using 

input parameter 

guidance (EPA 

2009) 

Vapor pressure 3.6 * 10-8 mm Hg 1998 RED 

Henry’s law 5.2 * 10-8 atmm3

/mol 

1998 RED 

Kow 94 1998 RED 

Incorporation depth 4 inches Label Label requires 6 

inches, adjusted to 4 

inches to account 

for bioturbation 

Application rate 0.00058 lbs a.i./A Label 

Number of 

applications 

2 Label 

Application interval 21 days Label Not specified- likely 

minimum interval 

deduced from label 

Modeling results: 

 RUN No. 1 FOR chlorophacinone ON btpd * INPUT VALUES * 

 -------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE NO-SPRAY INCORP 

 ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) (FT) (IN) 

 -------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 .001( .001) 2 21 35400.0 34.0 GRANUL( .0) .0 4.0 

 FIELD AND STANDARD POND HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS) 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED 

 (FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (POND) (POND-EFF) (POND) (POND) 

 -------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 65.00 2 N/A .06- 7.75 130.00 7.31 

 GENERIC EECs (IN NANOGRAMS/LITER (PPTr)) Version 2.0 Aug 1, 2001 

 -------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 PEAK MAX 4 DAY MAX 21 DAY MAX 60 DAY MAX 90 DAY 

 GEEC AVG GEEC AVG GEEC AVG GEEC AVG GEEC 

 -------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 1.00 .84 .37 .14 .09
Annual
      Statement as to Compliance


For
      the
      Year Ended December 31, 2006




***JP
      Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust***


***Series
      2006-LDP8***




**Pursuant
      to Section 3.03 of the Subservicing Agreement governing the referenced** **transaction,
      I hereby attest that:**




**i.
      A review of the activities of Capmark Finance Inc. as Subservicer during the** **period,
      and of its performance under this Subservicing Agreement, has been** **made
      under my supervision.**




**ii.
      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Capmark Finance Inc.** **as
      Subservicer, has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under this** **Pooling
      and Servicing Agreement throughout the period.**




**Capmark
      Finance Inc.**




/s/
      Mark
      E. McCool




By:
      Mark
      E. McCool


Title:
      Senior Vice President


Date:
      February 20, 2007



















Real
                Estate Finance, Investments, Services
            Capmark
                Finance
              200
                Witmer Road
              Horsham,
                Pa 19044
52.222-18 Certification Regarding

Knowledge of Child Labor for Listed End

Products.

As prescribed in 22.1505(a), insert the following provision:

Certification Regarding Knowledge of Child Labor for Listed End Products (Feb 2021)

(a) Definition.

Forced or indentured child labor means all work or service-

(1) Exacted from any person under the age of 18 under the menace of any penalty for its

nonperformance and for which the worker does not offer himself voluntarily; or

(2) Performed by any person under the age of 18 pursuant to a contract the enforcement of which

can be accomplished by process or penalties.

(b) Listed end products. The following end product(s) being acquired under this solicitation is (are)

included in the List of Products Requiring Contractor Certification as to Forced or Indentured Child

Labor, identified by their country of origin. There is a reasonable basis to believe that listed end

products from the listed countries of origin may have been mined, produced, or manufactured by

forced or indentured child labor.

Listed End Product Listed Countries of Origin

_________________ _________________

_________________ _________________

(c) Certification. The Government will not make award to an offeror unless the offeror, by checking

the appropriate block, certifies to either paragraph (c)(1) or paragraph (c)(2) of this provision.

(1) □ The offeror will not supply any end product listed in paragraph (b) of this provision that was

mined, produced, or manufactured in a corresponding country as listed for that end product.

(2) □ The offeror may supply an end product listed in paragraph (b) of this provision that was mined,

produced, or manufactured in the corresponding country as listed for that product. The offeror

certifies that it has made a good faith effort to determine whether forced or indentured child labor

was used to mine, produce, or manufacture such end product. On the basis of those efforts, the

offeror certifies that it is not aware of any such use of child labor.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Abraham Cohen, Petitioner, v. New York State Board of Pharmacy, Respondent.

Aulisi, J.

In this article 78 proceeding, the petitioner, a supervising pharmacist of a pharmacy owned by nonpharmaeists, seeks review of a determination of the State Board of Pharmacy that he was guilty of certain violations of article 137 of the Education Law (Pharmacy) and imposing a penalty of $100. Even without knowledge a supervising pharmacist fails in his responsibility by not properly performing the duties of his position as we held in *Matter of Bernstein*v. *Allen*(26 A D 2d 727) and *Matter of Cassell*v. *Allen*(27 A D 2d 597) which mandates confirmation. We find no reason to disturb the finding of the respondent. Determination confirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Staley, Jr., and Brink, JJ., concur with Aulisi, J.
#### Reta C. Whitcomb, as Administratrix of the Estate of Hanna E. Dickie, Deceased, Appellant, v. Ruth L. Dickie, Individually and as Executrix of Everett B. Dickie, Deceased, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We affirm, not only because the 1952 conveyance was not in violation of the Debtor and Creditor Law since the grantor was not insolvent then nor rendered insolvent thereby as held by the court below, but also for the additional reason that the action to set aside that conveyance was barred by the Statute of Limitations. Furthermore, fair consideration was given for the 1952 conveyance as well as for *690the 1960 conveyance. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term dismissing the complaint on the merits.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.
#### § 60.107 Food service establishment.

*Food service establishment* means a restaurant, cafeteria, lunch room, food stand, saloon, tavern, bar, lounge, or other similar facility operated as an enterprise engaged in the business of selling food to the public. Similar food service facilities include salad bars, delicatessens, and other food enterprises located within retail establishments that provide ready-to-eat foods that are consumed either on or outside of the retailer's premises.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CAROLYN ANN MILLER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 4:20cv514-MW/MAF

EBS SECURITY INC., and

PRINTELLA BANKHEAD,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SETTELEMENT CONFERENCE

The parties have filed a joint motion for settlement conference before a 

Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 45. The motion is GRANTED. This case is referred to 

Magistrate Judge Fitzpatrick who shall hold a settlement conference no later than 

Friday, March 24, 2023. The parties must confer and contact Judge Fitzpatrick’s

chambers to set a time for the settlement conference. 

SO ORDERED on January 25, 2023.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 46 Filed 01/25/23 Page 1 of 1
Silberstein Ungar, PLLCCPAs and Business Advisors


Phone (248) 203-0080


Fax (248) 281-0940


30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175


Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586


www.sucpas.com














December 1, 2010





To the Board of Directors of


New America Energy Corp.


formerly known as Atheron, Inc.


Calgary, Alberta, Canada





To Whom It May Concern:








Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC, hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, filed by Atheron, Inc. (now known New America Energy Corp.) as of our report dated November 26, 2010, relating to the financial statements of Atheron, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, for the periods ending August 31, 2010 and 2009.





Sincerely,





/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC
#### § 4280.157 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 4.15**

**Power of Attorney**

We, Beijing Century Friendship Education InvestmentCo., Ltd, the undersigned shareholder of Beijing New Oriental Education & Technology (Group) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “New Oriental China”), hereby authorize Shanghai Smart Words Software Technology CompanyLimited (hereinafter referred to as “Shanghai Smart Words”) as our proxy to exercise shareholder’s right representing 37% of New Oriental China’s voting shares as Shanghai Smart Words may deem appropriate or necessary.

Beijing Century Friendship Education Investment Co., Ltd. 

Signature: /s/Authorized Signatory

April 23, 2012
August 27, 2015

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 27th day of August, 2015.

10-14-00148-CR	RICHARD STEVEN McCLELLAN v. THE STATE OF TEXAS - ON APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BURLESON COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 14,325 – AFFIRMED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Davis:

	“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the Court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the judgment be in all things affirmed, and that the appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
# 37.403 Contract clause.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.237-7, Indemnification and Medical Liability *Insurance*, in *solicitations* and contracts for nonpersonal health care services. The *contracting officer**may* include the clause in bilateral *purchase orders* for nonpersonal health care services awarded under the procedures in part  13.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 37.4 - Nonpersonal Health Care Services
§ 58.148 Plant records. Adequate plant records shall be maintained of all required tests and analyses performed in the laboratory or throughout the plant during storage, processing and manufacturing, on all raw milk receipts and dairy products. Such records shall be available for examination at all reasonable times by the inspector. The following are the records which shall be maintained for examination at the plant or receiving station where performed. ( a ) Sediment and bacterial test results on raw milk from each producer. Retain for 12 months. ( 1 ) Routine tests and monthly summary of all producers showing number and percent of total in each class.
( 2 ) Retests, if initial test places milk in probationary status.
( 3 ) Rejections of raw milk over No. 3 in quality.
( b ) Pasteurization recorder charts. Retain for 3 months.
( c ) Water supply test certificate. Retain current copy for 6 months.
( d ) Cooling and heating recorder charts. Retain for 3 months.
( e ) Load and individual drug residue test results. Retain for 12 months.
( f ) Notifications to appropriate State regulatory agencies of positive drug residue tests and intended and final dispositions of milk testing positive for drug residue. Retain for 12 months.
( g ) Somatic cell count test results on raw milk from each producer. Retain for 12 months.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB control number 0583-0047)[1] [40 FR 47911, Oct. 10, 1975. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 47 FR 745, Jan. 7, 1982; 58 FR 26913, May 6, 1993]
52.216-19 Order Limitations.       As prescribed in 16.506(b), insert a clause substantially the same as follows:          Order Limitations (Oct 1995)                                       (a)                   *Minimum order*. When the Government requires supplies or services covered by this contract in an amount of less than _____________ [*insert dollar figure or quantity*], the Government is not obligated to purchase, nor is the Contractor obligated to furnish, those supplies or services under the contract.                                          (b)                   *Maximum order*. The Contractor is not obligated to honor-                                                         (1) Any order for a single item in excess of _____________ [*insert dollar figure or quantity*];                                                            (2) Any order for a combination of items in excess of ______________ [*insert dollar figure or quantity*]; or                                                            (3) A series of orders from the same ordering office within _____________ days that together call for quantities exceeding the limitation in paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section.                                                                             (c) 						            If this is a requirements contract (*i.e.,* includes the Requirements clause at subsection 52.216-21 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)), the Government is not required to order a part of any one requirement from the Contractor if that requirement exceeds the maximum-order limitations in paragraph (b) of this section.                                          (d) Notwithstanding paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Contractor shall honor any order exceeding the maximum order limitations in paragraph (b), unless that order (or orders) is returned to the ordering office within _____ days after issuance, with written notice stating the Contractor’s intent not to ship the item (or items) called for and the reasons. Upon receiving this notice, the Government may acquire the supplies or services from another source.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.216 [Reserved]
52.211-7 Alternatives to Government-Unique Standards.       As prescribed in 11.107(b), insert the following provision:          Alternatives to Government-Unique Standards (Nov 1999)                                       (a) 						            This solicitation includes Government-unique standards. The offeror may propose voluntary consensus standards that meet the Government’s requirements as alternatives to the Government-unique standards. The Government will accept use of the voluntary consensus standard instead of the Government-unique standard if it meets the Government’s requirements unless inconsistent with law or otherwise impractical.                                          (b) 						            If an alternative standard is proposed, the offeror must furnish data and/or information regarding the alternative in sufficient detail for the Government to determine if it meets the Government’s requirements. Acceptance of the alternative standard is a unilateral decision made solely at the discretion of the Government.                                          (c) 						            Offers that do not comply with the Government-unique standards specified in this solicitation may be determined to be nonresponsive or unacceptable. The offeror may submit an offer that complies with the Government-unique standards specified in this solicitation, in addition to any proposed alternative standard(s).                                 (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.211 [Reserved]