alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Edward Goldthorpe, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Portman Ridge Finance Corporation certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year endedDecember 31, 2018 of Portman Ridge Finance Corporation; and 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

Date: April 30, 2019 

 

/s/ Edward Goldthorpe

Edward Goldthorpe

President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer

(Principal Executive Officer)
**
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 10, 2017.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-1702

Lower Tribunal Nos. 99-1895B, 99-1876B, 99-2549A,

99-3075B, 99-3780B, 99-10155B, 99-10156B

________________



### Marco Hernandez,

Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141 (b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch, Judge.

Daniel Tibbitt, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Arlisa Certain, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse in part and affirm in part the order denying the defendant’s post-conviction relief motion. As the State commendably concedes in its response, we

reverse and remand with a direction that the court is to resentence the defendant in

case numbers F99-2549A and F99-3075B by removing the habitual violent felony

offender designation, and by correctly designating the defendant as a habitual

felony offender in those cases. Gonzalez v. State

, 208 So. 3d 143, 147 (Fla. 3d

DCA 2016) (“Because the record does not conclusively establish that Gonzalez's

double jeopardy claim has been previously decided on the merits, Gonzalez's

argument has merit.”). The defendant need not be present. Holmes v. State

, 100

So. 3d 281, 283 n.5 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).

We affirm the order in all other respects, and reject the defendant’s claim

that his sentence in F99-10156B should run concurrently, rather than

consecutively, with the sentence in F99-10155B. The court properly made these

sentences consecutive, to satisfy the original, total term of 30 years, as detailed in

the 1999 plea agreement and sentence.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Herbert Robinson, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 21, 1977, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a prison term of from two years to life. Judgment affirmed. The denial of defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea was not an improvident exercise of discretion (see *People v Russo,*61 AD2d 1052), nor is there any showing on this record that the court abused its discretion in imposing the sentence (see *People v Ackerman,*61 AD2d 878). Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Gibbons and Margett, JJ., concur.
#### § 60.102 AMS.

*AMS* means the Agricultural Marketing Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Ciiy of :/ac£son 

Mr. Scott Faulk 

Essential Air Service Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. Faulk: 

JERRY GIST 

MAYOR 

December 22, 2014 

t··.,J 

On behalf of the city of Jackson, please accept this letter supporting the 

decision of the Jackson-Madison County Airport Authority in their choice of the 

proposal submitted by Air Choice One to provide Essential Air Service to Jackson, 

Tennessee. 

Business leaders, plant managers and the public citizens have helped 

determine which of the two proposals would best serve the needs of the community. 

The Jackson/Nashville/Memphis service connection has unfortunately been underutilized. The presence of the Essential' Air Service Program serves as an advantage 

point to attract new industry and strengthen economic development in this region. 

I support air service that will engage an acceptable and consistent level of 

travelers. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact either myself 

or Tammy Buchanan (tbuchanan@cit;y;?fjackson.net). 

I ;.• ' 

JG/blm 

:,··r:Q~ 

Jerry Gist 

Mayor 

. ' . 

. 

~·. .; . ~
OAO 247 (02/08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

United States of America )

)

)

)

)

)

v.

Nathan Gambles Case No: 5:98cr36-SPM-3

USM No: 04438-017

Date of Previous Judgment: December 10, 2003 Rhonda Clyatt

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) Defendant’s Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of 9 the defendant 9 the Director of the Bureau of Prisons : the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

9 DENIED. : GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in 

the last judgment issued) of 270 months is reduced to 216 .

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: 38 Amended Offense Level: 36

Criminal History Category: II Criminal History Category: II

Previous Guideline Range: 262 to 327 months Amended Guideline Range: 210 to 262 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

: The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

9 The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time

of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the

amended guideline range.

9 Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Defendant was originally sentenced to the middle of the guideline range, and his sentence was later reduced by

approximately 8%. The amended sentence is comparable in that it is 8% below the middle of the amended guideline

range.

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated March 15, 1999 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: April 24, 2008 s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Judge’s signature

Effective Date: Stephan P. Mickle, United States District Judge

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

Case 5:98-cr-00036-RH Document 383 Filed 04/24/08 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Nos. 333-139476 and 333-152929)
on Form S-8 of our report dated March 31, 2009, relating to the 2008 consolidated financial statements (before retrospective adjustments to the financial statements) of
Heelys, Inc. and subsidiaries (not presented herein) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to not being engaged to audit the
retrospective adjustments) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Heelys, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Dallas,
Texas
March 12, 2010

---



QuickLinks
#### § 3550.151 Servicing goals.

This subpart sets forth the Rural Housing Service (RHS) policies for managing the repayment of loans made under sections 502 and 504 of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended.
**GGD-96-94**                      Published: Jun 12, 1996. Publicly Released: Jun 12, 1996.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the completion status of 380 National Performance Review (NPR) recommendations that NPR claimed were completed as of September 7, 1995.

## Full Report

Full Report (87 pages)

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Government Operations

Cost controlFederal agency reorganizationGeneral management reviewsPublic administrationManagement reengineeringReporting requirementsTotal quality managementEmbassy managementPrison costsGovernment reform
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-40099 Summary Calendar

__________________
CLAUDIS DEAN CARRINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHUCK E. MORRIS, Sheriff; ANDRES, Dr., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-91-CV-205

- - - - - - - - - - May 15, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Claudis Dean Carrington, a Texas state prisoner, appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants in his civil rights suit. Carrington has filed with this court a request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. Carrington argues that the defendants denied him adequate medical care after he fell from a top bunk bed while incarcerated at the Chambers County Jail. We have reviewed theNo. 96-40099 -2- record and conclude that Carrington has not demonstrated that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Accordingly, Carrington's motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. See Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case 3:20-cv-05863-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 10/02/20 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:20-cv-05863-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 10/02/20 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:20-cv-05863-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 10/02/20 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:20-cv-05863-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 10/02/20 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:20-cv-05863-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 10/02/20 Page 5 of 5
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76494-76495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30758]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Proposed Collection; Comment 
Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), as part of its 
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a 
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and 
Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or 
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(A)]. This program 
helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired 
format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, 
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of 
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. 
Currently, the NEA is soliciting comments concerning the proposed 
information collection on arts participation in the U.S. A copy of the 
current information collection request can be obtained by contacting 
the office listed below in the address section of this notice.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the 
address section below on or before February 1, 2011. The NEA is

[[Page 76495]]

particularly interested in comments which:
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity 
of the methodology and assumptions used;
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
    <bullet> Minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate 
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting 
electronic submissions of responses.

ADDRESSES: Sunil Iyengar, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 616, Washington, DC 20506-0001, 
telephone (202) 682-5424 (this is not a toll-free number), fax (202) 
682-5677.

Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Office of Guidelines and Panel Operations, National Endowment for the 
Arts.
[FR Doc. 2010-30758 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases.       As prescribed in 25.1103(a)(, insert the following clause:          Restrictions on certain foreign purchases (Feb 2021)                                       (a) Except as authorized by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) in the Department of the Treasury, the Contractor shall not acquire, for use in the performance of this contract, any supplies or services if any proclamation, Executive order, or statute administered by OFAC, or if OFAC’s implementing regulations at 31 CFR ChapterV, would prohibit such a transaction by a person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.                                          (b) Except as authorized by OFAC, most transactions involving Cuba, Iran, and Sudan are prohibited, as are most imports from Burma or North Korea, into the United States or its outlying areas. Lists of entities and individuals subject to economic sanctions are included in OFAC’s List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons at https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/specially-designated-nationals-and-blocked-persons-list-sdn-human-readable-lists. More information about these restrictions, as well as updates, is available in the OFAC’s regulations at 31 CFR ChapterV and/or on OFAC’s website at https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/office-of-foreign-assets-control-sanctions-programs-and-information.                                          (c) The Contractor shall insert this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all subcontracts.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.225 [Reserved]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-169-WKW

)

CECILLO PACHACHE, et al. )

ORDER REGARDING CRIMINAL FORFEITURE OF

THIRTY THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED FORTY ONE AND 84/100 DOLLARS ($30,141.84)

IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM MUTUAL SAVINGS CREDIT UNION

ACCOUNT IN GOVERNMENT CUSTODY

Before the court is the United States of America’s Application for Order Regarding Criminal

Forfeiture of Thirty Thousand One Hundred Forty One and 84/100 Dollars ($ 30,141.84) in United

States Currency Seized from Mutual Savings Credit Union Account in Government Custody 18

U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(B)(ii)II) (Doc. # 162). The property in question is Thirty Thousand One Hundred

Forty One and 84/100 Dollars ($30,141.84) in United States currency seized from Mutual Savings

Credit Union Account, which is already in the lawful custody of the Government. Further, the

Government filed a Bill of Particulars asserting that it will maintain and preserve the seized asset

throughout the pending criminal case so that it will be available for forfeiture.

It is ORDERED that the government’s motion (Doc. # 162) is GRANTED, and that the

United States and its agencies, including the Drug Enforcement Administration and/or the United

States Marshals Service, are authorized to maintain and preserve the seized asset until the conclusion

of the instant criminal case and the related forfeiture matter, pending further order of the court.

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 207 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

It is further ORDERED, that this Order satisfies the requirements described in Title 18, United States

Code, Section 983(a)(3)(B)(ii)(II).

Done this 23rd day of April 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 207 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 610.12 Equations for predicting soil loss due to water erosion. ( a ) The equation for predicting soil loss due to erosion for both the USLE and the RUSLE is *A = R × K × LS × C × P.* (For further information about USLE see the U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 537, “Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses—A Guide to Conservation Planning,” dated 1978. Copies of this document are available from the Natural Resources Conservation Service, P.O. Box 2890, Washington, DC 20013. For further information about RUSLE see the U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 703, “Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE).” Copies may be purchased from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.)
( b ) The factors in the USLE equation are: ( 1 ) *A* is the estimation of average annual soil loss in tons per acre caused by sheet and rill erosion.
( 2 ) *R* is the rainfall erosivity factor. Accounts for the energy and intensity of rainstorms.
( 3 ) *K* is the soil erodibility factor. Measures the susceptibility of a soil to erode under a standard condition.
( 4 ) *LS* is the slope length and steepness factor. Accounts for the effect of length and steepness of slope on erosion.
( 5 ) *C* is the cover and management factor. Estimates the soil loss ratio for each of 4 or 5 crop stage periods throughout the year, accounting for the combined effect of all the interrelated cover and management variables.
( 6 ) *P* is the support practice factor. Accounts for the effect of conservation support practices, such as contouring, contour stripcropping, and terraces on soil erosion.
( c ) The factors in the RUSLE equation are defined as follows: ( 1 ) *A* is the estimation of average annual soil loss in tons per acre caused by sheet and rill erosion.
( 2 ) *R* is the rainfall erosivity factor. Accounts for the energy and intensity of rainstorms.
( 3 ) *K* is the soil erodibility factor. Measures the susceptibility of a soil to erode under a standard condition and adjusts it bi-monthly for the effects of freezing and thawing, and soil moisture.
( 4 ) *LS* is the slope length and steepness factor. Accounts for the effect of length and steepness of slope on erosion based on 4 tables reflecting the relationship of rill to interrill erosion.
( 5 ) *C* is the cover and management factor. Estimates the soil loss ratio at one-half month intervals throughout the year, accounting for the individual effects of prior land use, crop canopy, surface cover, surface roughness, and soil moisture.
( 6 ) *P* is the support practice factor. Accounts for the effect of conservation support practices, such as cross-slope farming, stripcropping, buffer strips, and terraces on soil erosion.
52.247-65 F.o.b. Origin, Prepaid Freight-Small Package Shipments.       As prescribed in 47.303-17(f), insert the following clause:          F.o.b. Origin, Prepaid Freight-Small Package Shipments (Jan 1991)                                       (a) 						            When authorized by the Contracting Officer, f.o.b. origin freight shipments which do not have a security classification shall move on prepaid commercial bills of lading or other shipping documents to domestic destinations, including air and water terminals. Weight of individual shipments shall be governed by carrier restrictions but shall not exceed 150 pounds by any form of commercial air or 1,000 pounds by other commercial carriers. The Government will reimburse the Contractor for reasonable freight charges.                                          (b) 						            The Contractor shall annotate the commercial bill of lading as required by the clause of this contract entitled "Commercial Bill of Lading Notations."                                          (c) 						            The Contractor shall consolidate prepaid shipments in accordance with procedures established by the cognizant transportation office. The Contractor is authorized to combine Government prepaid shipments with the Contractor’s commercial shipments for delivery to one or more consignees and the Government will reimburse its pro rata share of the total freight costs. The Contractor shall provide a copy of the commercial bill of lading promptly to each consignee. Quantities shall not be divided into mailable lots for the purpose of avoiding movement by other modes of transportation.                                          (d) 						            Transportation charges will be billed as a separate item on the invoice for each shipment made. A copy of the pertinent bill of lading, shipment receipt, or freight bill shall accompany the invoice unless otherwise specified in the contract.                                          (e) 						            Loss and damage claims will be processed by the Government.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]