alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from ANGELES
PARTNERS  XIV 2000 Third  Quarter  10-QSB and is  qualified  in its  entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                 0000759859
<NAME>                                ANGELES PARTNERS XIV
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                    1,599
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               405
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                   28,359
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (19,501)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           11,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                  29,770
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                              (29,077)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             11,240
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          3,839
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          5,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        2,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (1,542)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (35.03)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
<FN>
<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
52.222-51 Exemption from Application of the

Service Contract Labor Standards to

Contracts for Maintenance, Calibration, or

Repair of Certain Equipment-Requirements.

As prescribed in 22.1006(e)(2), insert the following clause:

Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Labor Standards to Contracts for Maintenance,

Calibration, or Repair of Certain Equipment-Requirements (May 2014)

(a) The items of equipment to be serviced under this contract are used regularly for other than

Government purposes, and are sold or traded by the Contractor in substantial quantities to the

general public in the course of normal business operations.

(b) The services shall be furnished at prices which are, or are based on, established catalog or

market prices for the maintenance, calibration, or repair of equipment.

(1) An "established catalog price" is a price included in a catalog, price list, schedule, or other form

that is regularly maintained by the manufacturer or the Contractor, is either published or otherwise

available for inspection by customers, and states prices at which sales currently, or were last, made

to a significant number of buyers constituting the general public.

(2) An "established market price" is a current price, established in the usual course of trade between

buyers and sellers free to bargain, which can be substantiated from sources independent of the

manufacturer or Contractor.

(c) The compensation (wage and fringe benefits) plan for all service employees performing work

under the contract shall be the same as that used for these employees and for equivalent employees

servicing the same equipment of commercial customers.

(d) The Contractor is responsible for compliance with all the conditions of this exemption by its

subcontractors. The Contractor shall determine the applicability of this exemption to any

subcontract on or before subcontract award. In making a judgment that the exemption applies, the

Contractor shall consider all factors and make an affirmative determination that all of the conditions

in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this clause will be met.

(e) If the Department of Labor determines that any conditions for exemption in paragraphs (a)

through (c) of this clause have not been met, the exemption shall be deemed inapplicable, and the

contract shall become subject to the Service Contract Labor Standards statute. In such case, the

procedures at 29 CFR 4.123(e)(1)(iv) and 29 CFR 4.5(c) will be followed.

(f) The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (f), in

subcontracts for exempt services under this contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
#### § 58.30 Application for reinspection or regrading.

An application for the reinspection or regrading of any previously inspected or graded product may be made at any time by any interested party; and such application shall clearly indicate the reasons for requesting the reinspection or regrading. The provisions of the regulations in this subpart relative to inspection or grading service shall apply to reinspection or regrading service.
J

·I 

### I**~** 

### I l 

# l

I U.S.Departmentof Transportation OfficeoftheSecretary ofTransportation

December 6, 2013

Mr. John R. Mietus, Jr. Counsel for Orange Air, Inc. 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300 Bethesda, MD 20817-7500
DearMr. Mietus:**~**

## ...:3 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

This letter references your November 22, 2013, request submitted to the Department on behalfofOrange Air, Inc. ("Orange Air"), for a waiver from the dormancy provisions of §204.7(a) ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations. That sectionprovides that-
"an air carrier that has not commenced any type of air transportation operations for which it was found fit, willing, and able within one year of the date ofthat finding, or an air carrierthat, for any period ofone year after the date ofsuch a finding, has notprovided any type ofairtransportation for which thatkind offinding is required, is deemed no longer to continue to be fit to provide the air transportation for which it was found fit and, accordingly, its authority to provide such air transportation shall be revoked."
As you are aware, by Order 2011-11-31, issuedNovember 28, 2011, the Departmentfound Orange Air fit to engage in interstate and foreign charter passenger operations. The effectiveness of the air carrier's authority was conditioned upon Orange Air fulfilling a number ofconditions, including providing us with a copy ofits Air Carrier Certificate and Operations Specifications issued by the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") authorizing such operations. Order 2011-11-31 gave Orange Air until November 28, 2012, to make its authority effective, otherwise, the air carrier would be subjectto the revocation for dormancy provisions of §204.7(a). Subsequently, on November 27, 2012, March29, 2013, and July 31, 2013, the Department granted Orange Air waivers from the dormancy provisions, giving the air carrier additional time to commence operations, with the mostrecent waiver expiring onNovember 30, 2013.
In your November 22, letter, you indicate that Orange Air continues to work closely with the FAA, and the air carrier is in its final stages ofthe FAA certificationprocess. However, you state that the air carrier is unable to commence operations by November 30, 2013, due to the October 2013 government shutdown and FAA delays caused by limited agency

### l I 

## j 2

resources. Therefore, Orange Air requests that the Department grant the air carrier a waiverfrom §204.7(a) until February 28, 2014,to commence operations.

In light ofthe circumstances described above, we find it appropriate to grant Orange Air's request for an extension. Thus, this letter follows our November 27, 2013, communication with you confirming our grant ofsuch an extensionrequest. We grant Orange Air a waiver from §204.7(a). This waiverwill expire on February 28, 2014.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at (202) 366-9721.

f Laul(al Chief;Air Carrier Fitness Division

cc: Dockets DOT-OST-2011-0073 and DOT-OST-2011-0074

Mr. Jeffrey Hipps Mr. Charley Beers FAA Orlando CM0-29 5950 HazeltineNational Dr. Orlando, FL 32822
§ 56.64 Who shall perform the appeal. ( a ) An appeal grading or review of a decision requested under § 56.61(a) shall be made by the grader's immediate supervisor, or by one or more licensed graders assigned by the immediate supervisor.
( b ) Appeal gradings requested under § 56.61(b) shall be performed by a grader other than the grader who originally graded the product.
( c ) Whenever practical, an appeal grading shall be conducted jointly by two graders. The assignment of the grader(s) who will make the appeal grading requested under § 56.61(b) shall be made by the regional director or the Chief of the Grading Branch.
[35 FR 9918, June 17, 1970, as amended at 40 FR 20056, May 8, 1975. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981; 71 FR 42010, July 24, 2006]
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Active LearningClass ActivitiesClassroom TechniquesDiscovery LearningElementary EducationExperiential LearningIntegrated CurriculumLearning ActivitiesPreschool EducationStudent MotivationStudent ProjectsTeacher RoleTeacher Student RelationshipTeaching Methods

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2764 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2764

   To amend Public Law 108-67 to correct a provision relating to the 
          conveyance of the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2006

 Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. Ensign) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend Public Law 108-67 to correct a provision relating to the 
          conveyance of the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTION OF CONVEYANCE.

    Section 2 of Public Law 108-67 (117 Stat. 880) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Subject to'' and inserting the following:
    ``(a) In General.--Subject to'';
            (2) in subsection (a) (as designated by paragraph (1)), by 
        striking ``the parcel'' and all that follows and inserting the 
        following: ``and to a portion comprising approximately 23 acres 
        of land of Lots 3 and 4, as depicted on the United States and 
        Encumbrance Map, revised January 10, 1991, for the Toiyabe 
        National Forest, Ranger District Carson-1, and more 
        particularly described as S\1/2\NW\1/4\SE\1/4\ and N\1/2\SW\1/
        4\SE\1/4\ of sec. 27, T. 15 N., R. 18 E., Mt. Diablo Base and 
        Meridian.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Public Access and Use.--Nothing in this Act prohibits any 
approved general public access (through existing easements or by boat) 
to or use of land remaining within the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit 
after the conveyance to the Secretary of the Interior, in trust for the 
Tribe, under subsection (a), including access to and use of the beach 
and shoreline areas adjacent to the portion of land conveyed under that 
subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
28.203-5 Exclusion of individual sureties.

(a)An individual may be excluded from acting as a surety on bonds submitted by offerors on

procurement by the executive branch of the Federal Government, by the acquiring agency's head or

designee utilizing the procedures in subpart 9.4. The exclusion shall be for the purpose of

protecting the Government.

(b)An individual may be excluded for any of the following causes:

(1)Failure to fulfill the obligations under any bond.

(2)Failure to disclose all bond obligations.

(3)Misrepresentation of the value of available assets or outstanding liabilities.

(4)Any false or misleading statement, signature or representation on a bond or affidavit of individual

suretyship.

(5)Any other cause affecting responsibility as a surety of such serious and compelling nature as may

be determined to warrant exclusion.

(c)An individual surety excluded pursuant to this section shall be entered as an exclusion in the

System for Award Management (see 9.404).

(d)Contracting officers shall not accept the bonds of individual sureties whose names appear in an

active exclusion record in the System for Award Management (see 9.404) unless the acquiring

agency's head or a designee states in writing the compelling reasons justifying acceptance.

(e)An exclusion of an individual surety under this section will also preclude such party from acting as

a contractor in accordance with subpart 9.4.

Parent topic: 28.203 Individual Sureties.
# • RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 178 Petroleum Refining Process Wastes

-- Leachate Exemption 64 FR 6806 

### February 11, 1999 (RCRA ClusterIX, HSWA) SPA 20



# •

• t



# t

t



# t

t STATEANALOG IS: FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRAerrATION ANALOGOUS STATECITATION tass MORE WAC173-303- EQUIV· BROADER STRJN· STRJN· ALENT GENT GENT IN SCOPE PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SUBPART A - GENERAL EXCLUSIONS add new paragraph; leachate or 'gas condensate collected from landfills where 261.4(b)(15) intro 071(3)(kk) X certain solid wastes previously disposed, provided: solid wastes disposed meet one or more listing descriptions for KI69-KI72 if wastes 261.4(b)(l5)(i) 071(3)(kk)(i) X had been generated aftereffective date of listing (February 8, 1999); solid wastes in 261.4(b)(15)(i) were disposed prior to 261.4(b)(15)(ii) 071 (3)(kk)(ii) X effective date of listing; leachate or gas condensate do not exhibit any characteristic of 261.4(b)( 15)(iii) 071 (3)(kk)(iii) X hazardous waste nor are derived from any other listed hazardous waste; discharge of leachate 261.4(b)(15)(iv) 071 (3)(kk)(iv) X February 11, 1999 - Page 1 of 2 CL 178.wp - 5(24199 Printed: 12119101

### SPA 20



# o

-- STATEANALOG IS: 

## ('--. FEDERALRCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATECITATION LESS MORE FEDERALREQUIREMENTS WAC 173-303- EQUIV- STRIN- STRIN- BROADER ALENT GENT GENT INSCOPE or gas condensate, including transfer from the landfill to a POTW by truck, rail or dedicated pipe, is subject to 307(b) or 4020fCWA after February 13, 2001, leachate or gas condensate will no longer be exempt if stored or managed in surface impoundment 261.4(b)(15)(v) 071 (3)(kk)(v) X prior to discharge; exception ifsurface impoundment is used to temporarily store in response to an emergency 

# t



# ()

February 11, 1999 - Page 2 of 2 CL 178.wp - 5124199 Printed: 12119/01
162 So.2d 10

#### FIESTA FOODS, INC. v. Gordon C. OGDEN, Jr., d/b/a Cremeo Products Company.

No. 47140.

March 31, 1964.

In re: Fiesta Foods, Inc. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 159 So.2d 577.

The application is denied. According to the facts of the case, as found to be by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
EXHIBIT
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the “Report”) of Zulu Energy
      Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007, the undersigned
      Paul Stroud, the Chief Executive Officer, and Satyendra Deshpande, Chief
      Financial Officer, of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that, to the best of each of the undersigned’s knowledge and
      belief:




(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                April 14, 2008
            /s/
                Paul StroudPaul
                Stroud, President and Chief Executive
                Officer




Dated:
                April 14, 2008
            /s/
                Satyendra DeshpandeSatyendra
                Deshpande, Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal
                Accounting Officer
|   | Exhibit      32.1 |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Cheryl P.      Beranek |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
# L_2014076EN.01004101.xml

| 15.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 76/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/41

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUFOR RCA/3/2014

of 11 March 2014

on the acceptance of third States’ contributions to the European Union military operation in the Central African Republic (EUFOR RCA)

(2014/139/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2014/73/CFSP of 10 February 2014 on a European Union military operation in the Central African Republic (EUFOR RCA) (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2014/73/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of the proposed contributions by third States. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2014/73/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of the proposed contributions by third States.

| (2) | Following recommendations on a contribution from Georgia by the EU Operation Commander and the advice from the European Union Military Committee, the contribution from Georgia should be accepted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following recommendations on a contribution from Georgia by the EU Operation Commander and the advice from the European Union Military Committee, the contribution from Georgia should be accepted.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications. Consequently, Denmark is not participating in the adoption of this Decision and is neither bound by it nor subject to its application, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications. Consequently, Denmark is not participating in the adoption of this Decision and is neither bound by it nor subject to its application,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Third States’ contributions

1.   The contribution from Georgia to the European Union military operation in the Central African Republic (EUFOR RCA) is accepted and is considered to be significant.

2.   Georgia is exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUFOR RCA.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 11 March 2014.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 40, 11.2.2014, p. 59.

1

---