alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
                DELAWARE OTSEGO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                 EXHIBIT 11
                                 Unaudited
                   (THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<CAPTION>
                          THREE MONTHS ENDED          NINE MONTHS ENDED
                     --------------------------- ---------------------------
                      Sep 30, 1996  Sep 30, 1995  Sep 30, 1996  Sep 30, 1995 
                     ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S>                       <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
PRIMARY  (1)
---------------------
Weighted Average
 Shares Outstanding          1,744         1,613         1,729         1,613
                     ============= ============= ============= =============
Net Income (Loss)         $    318      $    (84)     $ (1,177)     $  2,115
                     ============= ============= ============= =============
Earnings (Loss)
 per Share                $   0.18      $  (0.05)     $  (0.68)     $   1.31
                     ============= ============= ============= =============

FULLY DILUTED  (1)
---------------------
Average Shares 
 Outstanding                 1,744         1,613         1,729         1,613
Assumed Conversion 
 of 6.5% Convertible 
 Subordinated Notes            338             *             *           338
                     ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
                             2,082         1,613         1,729         1,951
                     ============= ============= ============= =============

Net Income (Loss)         $    318      $    (84)     $ (1,177)     $  2,115
Add:  6.5% Convertible
 Subordinated Note
 Interest, net of tax           35             *             *           117
                     ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Totals                    $    353      $    (84)     $ (1,177)     $  2,232
                     ============= ============= ============= ============= 
Earnings (Loss) per Share $   0.17             *             *      $   1.14
                     ============= ============= ============= =============



*  Conversion of Convertible Subordinated Notes not assumed due to 
   anti-dilutive effect.

(1) Exercise of potentially dilutive outstanding stock options and warrants
    has not been assumed in the primary and fully diluted earnings per share
    calculations as the exercise prices of the respective options and 
    warrants exceeded the applicable market price of the Company's stock.

</TABLE>
                                    - 19 -
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2016130EN.01000801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 130/8 |

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 347 of 20 December 2013](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2013_347_R_TOC)
)

On page 648, first subparagraph of Article 61(2):

for:

‘2.   Payments under the small farmers scheme shall replace the payments to be granted pursuant to Titles III and IV.’,

read:

‘2.   Payments under the small farmers scheme shall replace the direct payments to be granted pursuant to Titles III and IV.’;

on page 649, Article 63(2)(a):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(a) | an amount equal to the total value of the payments to be allocated ...’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(a) | an amount equal to the total value of the direct payments to be allocated ...’; |

on page 649, Article 63(2)(b):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | an amount equal to the total value of the payments to be allocated ...’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | an amount equal to the total value of the direct payments to be allocated ...’. |

---
§ 631.12 Cost-share payments. ( a ) Federal cost sharing shall be adjusted so that the combined cost share by Federal and state government or subdivision of a state shall not exceed 100 percent of the cost.
( b ) Cost-share payments for completing resource management systems or a practice or an identifiable unit according to specifications will be made by NRCS as specified in the contract or as adjusted according to § 631.12(a).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Baggio, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed February 1, 1980. Resentence affirmed. No opinion. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Mangano and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
M

E

FW

FW

Twin 

Barns

Visitor Center

 ̈§¦5

Puget Sound

McAllister Creek

Trail 

Seasonally 

Closed 

Between 

Hatch Marks

Nisqually R vi er

Fishing 

Seasonally Closed

M

E

FW

FW

Twin 

Barns

Visitor Center

 ̈§¦5

Puget Sound

McAllister Creek

Trail 

Seasonally 

Closed 

Between 

Hatch Marks

Nisqually R vi er

Fishing 

Seasonally Closed

Alternative B: Refuge Expansion of 2,407 Acres 

and Minimum Estuarine Restoration

Figure 2.3-2

Source: USFWS, 2000; Ducks Unlimited, 1999; EDAW, 2002

Chapter 2 Alternatives

Nisqually NWR Draft CCP/EIS

2-11

P:\0e01401 Nisqually\GIS\mxd\Figure2.3-2.mxd

N

0 0.5 1 0.25 Miles

1:40,000

Legend

Bank Fishing Access

Public Recreation Trail

RNA Boundary

Dike Changes

Current Ownership within Boundary

Breach

Existing

Removed

Expansion Area

Nisqually Tribe

Private

WDFW

USFWS

Muted Estuarine Restoration

Estuarine Restoration

Freshwater Wetland Enhancements

 M

 E

FW

Approved Nisqually NWR Boundary

New Internal

New External
52.223-21 Foams.       As prescribed in 23.804(a)(4), insert the following clause:          Foams (Jun 2016)                                       (a)                   *Definitions*. As used in this clause–                                                         *Global warming potential* means how much a given mass of a chemical contributes to global warming over a given time period compared to the same mass of carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide’s global warming potential is defined as 1.0.                                                            *High global warming potential hydrofluorocarbons* means any hydrofluorocarbons in a particular end use for which EPA’s Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program has identified other acceptable alternatives that have lower global warming potential. The SNAP list of alternatives is found at 40 CFR part 82 subpart G with supplemental tables of alternatives available at (http://www.epa.gov/snap/).                                                            *Hydrofluorocarbons* means compounds that only contain hydrogen, fluorine, and carbon.                                                                             (b) 						            Unless otherwise specified in the contract, the Contractor shall reduce its use, release, and emissions of high global warming potential hydrofluorocarbons and refrigerant blends containing hydrofluorocarbons, when feasible, from foam blowing agents, under this contract. When determining feasibility of using a particular alternative, the Contractor shall consider environmental, technical, and economic factors such as–                                                         (1) 								                In-use emission rates, energy efficiency, and safety;                                                            (2) 								                Ability to meet performance requirements; and                                                            (3) 								                Commercial availability at a reasonable cost.                                                                             (c) 						            The Contractor shall refer to EPA’s SNAP program to identify alternatives. The SNAP list of alternatives is found at 40 CFR part 82 subpart G with supplemental tables available at http://www.epa.gov/snap/.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.223 [Reserved]
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

★▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/16

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL

★■

■

■

★

■

■

■

■

●★

●

●

★

●

●

●

●
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 10 a.m.-12 Noon.

# PLACE: 

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS: 

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

# Matter To Be Considered:

 

*Briefing Matter:*                         Full-Sized and Nonfull-Sized Cribs—Final Rules.                    

                        A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at                         *http://www.cpsc.gov/​webcast*.                    

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: November 30, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-30484 Filed 12-1-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
52.204-12 Unique Entity Identifier Maintenance.       As prescribed in 4.607(c), insert the following clause:          Unique Entity Identifier Maintenance (Oct 2016)                                       (a)                   *Definition.* Unique entity identifier, as used in this clause, means a number or other identifier used to identify a specific commercial, nonprofit, or Government entity. See www.sam.gov for the designated entity for establishing unique entity identifiers.                                          (b) 						            The Contractor shall ensure that the unique entity identifier is maintained with the entity designated at the System for Award Management (SAM) for establishment of the unique entity identifier throughout the life of the contract. The Contractor shall communicate any change to the unique entity identifier to the Contracting Officer within 30 days after the change, so an appropriate modification can be issued to update the data on the contract. A change in the unique entity identifier does not necessarily require a novation be accomplished.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.204 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10127 No. 95-10128 No. 95-10129 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN GILBERTO GIRALDO, Defendant-Appellant.

******************************************************* UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARGARITA ELENA RESTREPO, Defendant-Appellant.

******************************************************* UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus JOSE ANIBAL VIDAL, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CR-043-R
- - - - - - - - - -No. 95-10127 No. 95-10128 No. 95-10129 -2-

*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. May 21, 1996 Before WIENER, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * In these consolidated appeals, Juan Giraldo, Margarita Restrepo, and Jose Vidal appeal their sentences for conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Giraldo and Vidal contend that the district court erred by attributing to them more than 142 kilograms of cocaine. Giraldo, Vidal, and Restrepo contend that the district court erred by denying them downward adjustments for their roles in the offense; erred by upwardly adjusting their offense levels for possession of a firearm; and erred by denying them downward departures based on their deportable-alien status. We have reviewed the records and the briefs of the parties and we find no reversible error. First, the attribution of 440 kilograms of cocaine to Giraldo and the attribution of 646 kilograms of cocaine to Vidal was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Maseratti , 1 F.3d 330, 340 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1096, and cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1552, and cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 282 (1994). Second, Giraldo's, Restrepo's, and Vidal's sentences were based on amounts of cocaine closely linked to their participation in the conspiracy. The district court's denial ofNo. 95-10127 No. 95-10128 No. 95-10129 -3- an adjustment for a mitigating role in the offense was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Atanda , 60 F.3d 196, 199 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Zuniga , 18 F.3d 1254, 1261 (5th Cir. 1994). Third, the district court's finding that Giraldo, Restrepo, and Vidal possessed a gun in connection with their drug offense was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Mitchell , 31 F.3d 271, 278 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 455, and cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 649 (1994), and cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 770, and cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 953 (1995). Finally, we lack jurisdiction to consider the appellants' contention that the district court should have granted them downward departures based on their alien statuses, United States v. DiMarco , 46 F.3d 476, 478 (5th Cir. 1995); we therefore dismiss their downward-departure claim. Id
. AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DELORES CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5907-MCR-MJF

FL HUD BAYBREEZE, LLC,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement of this

matter. See ECF No. 14. Therefore, the Court hereby DISMISSES the aboveentitled action from the active docket of the Court. In the event the settlement is not

consummated, the Courtreservesthe power to reopen the case for further proceedings

upon motion filed by any party within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order and a

showing of good cause. At thistime, the Clerk is directed to close the file in this case 

Case 3:20-cv-05907-MCR-MJF Document 15 Filed 03/26/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

for administrative purposes. Upon the expiration of sixty (60) days without activity,

the Clerk is directed to close the case in its entirety for all purposes.

DONE and ORDERED on this 26th day of March 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case No. 3:20cv5907-MCR-MJF

Case 3:20-cv-05907-MCR-MJF Document 15 Filed 03/26/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 319.24-4 [Reserved]
§ 58.418 Automatic cheese making equipment. ( a ) *Automatic Curd Maker.* The automatic curd making system shall be constructed of stainless steel or of material approved in the 3-A Sanitary Standards for Plastic, and Rubber and Rubber-Like Material. All areas shall be free from cracks and rough surfaces and constructed so that they can be easily cleaned.
( b ) *Curd conveying systems.* The curd conveying system, conveying lines and cyclone separator shall be constructed of stainless steel or other equally corrosion resistant metal and in such manner that it can be satisfactorily cleaned. The system shall be of sufficient size to handle the volume of curd and be provided with filtered air of the quality satisfactory for the intended use. Air compressors or vacuum pumps shall not be located in the processing or packaging areas.
( c ) *Automatic salter.* The automatic salter shall be constructed of stainless steel or other equally corrosion resistant metal. This equipment shall be constructed to equally distribute the salt throughout the curd. It shall be designed to accurately weigh the amount of salt added. The automatic salter shall be constructed so that it can be satisfactorily cleaned. The salting system shall provide for adequate absorption of the salt in the curd. Water and steam used to moisten the curd prior to salting shall be potable water or culinary steam.
( d ) *Automatic curd filler.* The automatic curd filler shall be constructed of stainless steel or other equally corrosion resistant metal. This equipment shall be of sufficient size to handle the volume of curd and constructed and controlled so as to accurately weigh the amount of curd as it fills. The curd filler shall be constructed so that it can be satisfactorily cleaned.
( e ) *Hoop and barrel washer.* The washer shall be constructed so that it can be satisfactorily cleaned. It shall also be equipped with temperature and pressure controls to ensure satisfactory cleaning of the hoops or barrels. It should be adequately vented to the outside.
42.703 General.

42.703-1 Policy.

42.703-2 Certificate of indirect costs.

Parent topic: Subpart 42.7 - Indirect Cost Rates
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                     10,457,900
<SECURITIES>                                2,024,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  95,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           12,577,600
<PP&E>                                     18,043,500
<DEPRECIATION>                              3,748,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             26,914,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       7,443,300
<BONDS>                                     1,569,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                 17,808,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               26,914,800
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            5,217,700
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,730,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              146,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            233,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             2,177,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         2,177,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                2,177,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    2.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.96


</TABLE>
#### § 3560.251 General.

This subpart contains policies for borrower administration and tenant use of rental subsidies in Agency financed multi-family housing (MFH) projects.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,533,165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,533,165
<PP&E>                                       6,093,602
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,626,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,805
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,528,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,626,767
<SALES>                                        594,440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,166,336
<CGS>                                          163,384
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  163,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               340,158
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,662,794
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,662,794
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,662,794
<EPS-BASIC>                                      24.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    24.06


</TABLE>
§ 622.10 Sponsors. ( a ) Watershed projects are sponsored by one or more local organizations qualifying as sponsors. All watershed plans must be sponsored by entities legally organized under State law or by any Indian Tribe or Tribal organization having the authority to carry out, operate, and maintain works of improvement. ( 1 ) *In General.* Those plans that incorporate the use of nonstructural or structural measures must be sponsored by organizations that, individually or collectively, have: ( i ) The power of eminent domain, except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section; and
( ii ) The authority to levy taxes or use other adequate funding sources, to finance their share of the watershed project cost and all operation and maintenance costs.
( 2 ) *Exception.* Paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section does not apply to Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations.
( b ) To receive Federal assistance for project installation, sponsors must commit themselves to use their powers and authority to carry out and maintain the project as planned.
[49 FR 6078, Feb. 17, 1984, as amended at 89 FR 65991, Aug. 14, 2024]