alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 51.3418 Optional test for fry color. Fry color may be determined in accordance with contract specifications by using the Munsell Color Standards for Frozen French Fried Potatoes, Third Edition, 1972, 64-1.[5] Select a minimum of twenty (20) potatoes at random from the official sample. Slice each potato from stem to blossom-end into 1 ⁄ 2 square inch strips. Unless otherwise specified, fry center cut strips in oil for a minimum of 3 minutes at 350 °F or 21 ⁄ 2 minutes at 375 °F. Footnotes -
51.3418
[5] Munsell Color Standards for Frozen French Fried Potatoes, Third Edition, 1972, 64-1, may be purchased from the Munsell Color Co., 2441 North Calvert St., Baltimore, MD 21218.
Case 1:97-cr-00015-MP   Document 47   Filed 06/30/06   Page 1 of 1
#### § 54.1017 Authority to use official identification.

The Chief may authorize an applicant or any persons designated by the applicant to use the official identification symbol to mark equipment or utensils, or for display in descriptive or promotional materials providing the equipment or utensils is evaluated pursuant to this subpart and found to be in compliance.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 232 (Friday, December 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30484]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 10 a.m.-12 Noon.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered: 
    Briefing Matter: Full-Sized and Nonfull-Sized Cribs--Final Rules.
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: November 30, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30484 Filed 12-1-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      16,640,780
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          86,357
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            31,750,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 71,413,087
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       5,013,587
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         5,138,408
<LOANS>                                    108,188,603
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,111,153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             240,134,096
<DEPOSITS>                                 218,682,649
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,586,831
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,864,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             240,134,096
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,089,874
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,883,774
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 7,812
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            10,981,465
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,010,227
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,227,533
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,753,932
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,737,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,565,183
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,683,978
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,683,978
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    .041
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,264,262
<LOANS-PAST>                                    95,828
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              3,626,555
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,542,513
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                1,070,445
<RECOVERIES>                                   639,085
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,111,153
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,111,153
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant To


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) by The Saint James
Company (“Registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of
his knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





/s/ RICHARD
      HURSTRichard
      HurstChief
      Executive Officer





Date:  November
23, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to The Saint James Company
and will be retained by The Saint James Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:03-CR-30-SPM

JERMAINE CREWS,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation (doc. 68) . The parties have been furnished a copy and have been

afforded an opportunity to file objections. No objections have been filed to date.

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have determined

that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 68) is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed.

DONE AND ORDERED this thirteenth day of November, 2007.

 s/Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cr-00030-SPM-AK Document 70 Filed 11/13/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.1


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

  NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN, N.Y. 11217


May 12, 2009


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.

2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza

Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


Smart Trust, Diversified Dividend Trust (2009 Series C)


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Diversified Dividend Trust (2009 Series C) set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The
prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on May 11, 2009, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York
Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-158979) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing
of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


		
		Very truly yours,
		 
		/s/ JOHN  KUCINIC 
		
      

    
	
        	
      Vice President
#### § 58.323 [Reserved]
#### § 4285.1 Objective.

This subpart sets forth the policies and procedures and delegates authority for providing Federal-State Research on Cooperatives cooperative agreement funds to finance programs of research on cooperatives as authorized under Section 204 (b) of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1623 (b)). The primary purpose of this matching fund program, via cooperative agreements, is to encourage State Departments of Agriculture and State Agricultural Experiment Stations in conducting research related to agricultural cooperatives.
`ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

      Newport Management Corporation (the "Asserting Party") provides
this assessment of compliance with respect to its performance of
functions for the Applicable Servicing Criteria, as specified in Item
1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, in regards to the loans selected in the Platform for the
following Period:

Platform:  Pools of loans, underlying publicly-issued residential
mortgage-backed securities that were issued on or after January 1,
2006 by IndyMac Bank ("IndyMac"), on which escrow payments were
disbursed in 2006, specifically Item 1122(d)(4)(xi), only as it relates
to the "Applicable Servicing Criteria" described below, and as
disclosed by IndyMac to the Asserting Party (collectively, "Eligible
Loans", as identified in Schedule A).

Period:  As of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Applicable Servicing Criteria:  the servicing criteria which applies to
the functions performed by the Asserting Party is set forth in Section
229.1122(d)(4)(xi) ("Applicable Servicing Criteria").  With respect to
the Applicable Servicing Criteria, the Asserting Party performs the
following limited functions:

1.      Processes the obligor's hazard insurance information it
receives and provides IndyMac with the applicable hazard insurance
effective date, payment amount, and payee (collectively, "Insurance
Information");

2.       Provides the Insurance Information to IndyMac no later than
5 days prior to the applicable expiration date as indicated in the
Insurance Information.

      With respect to the Platform, and with respect to the Period, the
Asserting Party provides the following assessment of its compliance in
respect of the Applicable Servicing Criteria (as defined above):

      1.  The Asserting Party is responsible for assessing its
compliance with respect to the functions it performs for the
Applicable Servicing Criteria.

      2.  The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with respect
to the functions it performs for the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

      3.  Other than as identified on Schedule B hereto, as of and for
the Period, the Asserting Party was in material compliance with respect
to the functions it performs for the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

      KPMG, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Asserting Party's
foregoing assessment of compliance.

NEWPORT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

By: /s/ Mark A. McElroy
   -------------------------------
Its: Executive Vice President

Dated: February 27, 2007`

---

`Schedule A

                           Eligible Loans



   Exhibit Maintained at the office of the depositor`

---

`Schedule B

                 Material Instances of Noncompliance

No Material instances of noncompliance:  Newport Management
Corporation has complied, in all material respects, with the
aforementioned criterion as of and for the year ended December
31, 2006.`
47.102 Transportation insurance.       (a) 						            The Government generally-                                                         (1) 								                Retains the risk of loss of and/or damage to its property that is not the legal liability of commercial carriers and                                                            (2) 								                Does not buy insurance coverage for its property in the possession of commercial carriers (40 U.S.C.17307). (See part  28, Bonds and Insurance.)                                                                             (b) 						            Under special circumstances the Government may, if such action is considered necessary and in the Government’s interest, (1) buy insurance coverage for Government property or (2) require the carrier to (i) assume full responsibility for loss of or damage to the Government property in its possession and (ii) buy insurance to cover the carrier’s assumed responsibility. The cost of this insurance to the carrier shall be part of the transportation cost. (The Secretary of the Treasury prescribes regulations regarding shipments of valuables in 31 CFR parts 361 and 362.)                                          (c)                                                         (1) 								                If special circumstances dictate the need for the Government to buy insurance coverage, the contracting officer shall ascertain that-                                                                           (i) 										                    There is no statutory prohibition; and                                                                              (ii) 										                    Funds for insurance are available.                                                                                                           (2) 								                The contracting officer shall document the need and authorization for insurance coverage in the contract file.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 47.1 - General
30.201-5 Waiver.

(a) The head of the agency-

(1) May waive the applicability of CAS for a particular contract or subcontract under the conditions

listed in paragraph (b) of this subsection; and

(2) Must not delegate this waiver authority to any official in the agency below the senior contract

policymaking level.

(b) The head of the agency may grant a waiver when one of the following conditions exists:

(1) The contract or subcontract value is less than 15 million, and the head of the agency determines,

in writing, that the segment of the contractor or subcontractor that will perform the contract or

subcontract-

(i) Is primarily engaged in the sale of commercial products or commercial services; and

(ii) Has no contracts or subcontracts that are subject to CAS.

(2) The head of the agency determines that exceptional circumstances exist whereby a waiver of

CAS is necessary to meet the needs of the agency. Exceptional circumstances exist only when the

benefits to be derived from waiving the CAS outweigh the risk associated with the waiver. The

determination that exceptional circumstances exist must-

(i) Be set forth in writing; and

(ii) Include a statement of the specific circumstances that justify granting the waiver.

(c) When one of the conditions in paragraph (b) of this subsection exists, the request for waiver

should include the following:

(1) The amount of the proposed award.

(2) A description of the contract or subcontract type (e.g., firm-fixed-price, cost-reimbursement).

(3) Whether the segment(s) that will perform the contract or subcontract has CAS-covered contracts

or subcontracts.

(4) A description of the item(s) being procured.

(5) When the contractor or subcontractor will not accept the contract or subcontract if CAS applies,

a statement to that effect.

(6) Whether certified cost or pricing data will be obtained, and if so, a discussion of how the data will

be used in negotiating the contract or subcontract price.

(7) The benefits to the Government of waiving CAS.

(8) The potential risk to the Government of waiving CAS.

(9) The date by which the waiver is needed.
(10) Any other information that may be useful in evaluating the request.

(d) When neither of the conditions in paragraph (b) of this subsection exists, the waiver request must

be prepared in accordance with 48 CFR 9903.201-5(e) and submitted to the CAS Board.

(e) Each agency must report any waivers granted under paragraph (a) of this subsection to the CAS

Board, on a fiscal year basis, not later than 90 days after the close of the Government’s fiscal year.

Parent topic: 30.201 Contract requirements.
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   9-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1997
[PERIOD-END]                               SEP-30-1997
[CASH]                                          790608
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                790608
[PP&E]                                         6670527
[DEPRECIATION]                                 2282371
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 5178764
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                           962793
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                             0
[OTHER-SE]                                     4215971
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   5178764
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                468933
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                424442
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                               22271
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                      0
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                  0
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                     22221
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                      3.9
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Wentworth IV, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin R. Keating,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Kevin R. KeatingKevin
                R. Keating
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              March
                31, 2008
#### § 52.25 When an application for an appeal inspection may be withdrawn.

An application for appeal inspection may be withdrawn by the applicant at any time before the appeal inspection is performed: *Provided,* That, the applicant shall pay at the hourly rate prescribed in § 52.42, for the time incurred by the inspector in connection with such application, any travel expenses, telephone, telegraph, or other expenses which have been incurred by the inspection service in connection with such application.

[22 FR 3535, May 22, 1957, as amended at 38 FR 25166, Sept. 12, 1973. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977 and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Case No. 4:97cr76-RH

vs. Case No. 4:06cv359-RH/WCS

TERRY LEE PRESLEY,

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS § 2255 MOTION

Defendant filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Doc. 124. The court entered an

order to show cause why the motion, challenging the judgment entered on the first

revocation of supervised release, should not be dismissed as untimely under § 2255. 

Doc. 127 (incorporated by reference). 

Defendant confirms that he is challenging only the judgment on his first

revocation, and claims entitlement to equitable tolling because he "believed that his

counsel had pursued an appeal and relied upon the diligence of his counsel in the

present case." Doc. 128, pp. 1-2. As previously noted, the period is subject to

equitable tolling only on a showing of extraordinary circumstances both beyond

Defendant's control and unavoidable with diligence. Doc. 127, pp. 2-3. 

Case 4:97-cr-00076-RH-WCS Document 129 Filed 10/10/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case Nos. 4:97cr76-RH and 4:06cv359-RH/WCS

The judgment at issue was entered on July 5, 2002. Doc. 98. Defense counsel

filed a motion to clarify sentencing on August 28, 2002, advising that Defendant

reported the day before to the halfway house and needed to register for classes by the

next day. Doc. 99. An order was entered shortly thereafter recommending that

Defendant be permitted to continue his education. Doc. 100.

Clearly, Defendant had contact with his counsel shortly after the entry of

judgment. If he thought an appeal was being pursued he should have inquired at that

time, and would have realized a notice of appeal had not been filed. The docket does

not reflect that Defendant made any attempt to contact the court regarding an appeal

from that judgment. Taking as true the assertion that Defendant relied on counsel and

believed he was pursuing an appeal, he has not shown due diligence. Equitable tolling

is not warranted. 

It is therefore respectfully RECOMMENDED that Defendant's § 2255 motion,

challenging the judgment of July 5, 2002, be SUMMARILY DENIED as untimely. 

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on October 10, 2006. 

 S/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after

being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of

review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case 4:97-cr-00076-RH-WCS Document 129 Filed 10/10/06 Page 2 of 2