alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.34.1





 Exhibit 10.34.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 

2012 GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC. 

OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) to the 2012 Genworth Financial, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is made
this 12th day of December 2017. 
 1. The Plan is hereby amended by deleting the first
paragraph of Section 12.2(a) in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 
 “Performance Measures.
Performance-Based Compensation (other than Awards of Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights) shall be earned, vested and payable (as applicable) based on the achievement of performance goals established by the Committee based on one or more of
the following performance measures: (i) net earnings or net income (before or after taxes); (ii) earnings growth or source of earnings; (iii) earnings per share; (iv) net sales (including net sales growth); (v) gross profits or net
operating profit; (vi) return measures (including, but not limited to, return on assets, capital, equity, or sales); (vii) cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow, free cash flow, cash flow return on capital and statutory
cash measures); (viii) revenue growth; (ix) earnings before or after taxes, interest, depreciation, and/or amortization; (x) productivity ratios; (xi) share price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and total shareholder
return); (xii) expense targets; (xiii) margins (including, but not limited to, gross or operating margins); (xiv) operating efficiency; (xv) customer satisfaction or increase in the number of customers; (xvi) attainment of budget
goals; (xvii) attainment of strategic or operational initiatives; (xviii) competitive positioning; (xix) cost reductions; (xx) working capital targets (including, but not limited to, capital ratios, capital or book value
metrics); (xxi) company ratings; (xxii) EVA® and other value-added measures.” 

Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms of the Plan shall be and remain unchanged and the Plan as amended hereby shall remain in full
force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representative on
the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael S. Laming
	Name:	 	Michael S. Laming
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President—Human Resources
#### § 65.265 USDA.

*USDA* means the United States Department of Agriculture.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           6,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,835
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       286,142
<OTHER-SE>                                   (296,818)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       159
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (263)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (263)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven Johnson, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: While the initial police detention of the defendant lacked probable cause and was therefore illegal *(Dunaway v New York,*442 US 200; *People v Misuis,*47 NY2d 979), his confession was not gained through the exploitation of this illegality. Instead, he made inculpatory statements only after the police, by virtue of their having obtained a statement from a codefendant which clearly implicated the defendant in these crimes, had obtained the probable cause necessary for a legal arrest (see *People v Berzups,*49 NY2d 417). Since these admissions were otherwise voluntary, the defendant’s motion to suppress was, therefore, properly denied. We have examined the defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court—manslaughter, first degree.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
Page 1 of 2

1

The court notes that this attorney was provided with electronic notice of all other docket entries made

in this case, including the order directing a response and the fact that said order was returned as

undeliverable. He has filed nothing further with the court, leading further credibility to the supposition that he

has never intended to be “counsel of record” in this matter.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. 3:04cr1/LAC

3:06cv245/LAC/MD

LA WANDA NALL, #05775-017

 Defendant.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Defendant filed a motion

to vacate, set aside or correct sentence which was docketed by the clerk on June 6, 2006.

(Doc. 145). The court initially recommended that the motion be dismissed as premature

due to the pendency of the defendant’s petition for certiorari (doc. 146). Defendant filed

her § 2255 motion pro se, but the objections to the report and recommendation were filed

by an attorney who did not file a formal notice of appearance in her behalf (doc. 147 &

148), and who failed to comply with the court’s rules regarding electronic filings.1 (Doc. 149

& 150). The court vacated its recommendation once the defendant’s petition for certiorari

was denied, and the government was directed to respond. (Doc. 151 & 152). The

government filed its response (doc. 153) and the court entered an order directing

defendant to reply. (Doc. 154). This order was returned to the court as undeliverable on

October 4, 2006 (doc. 155), and to date the defendant has not apprised the court of any

Case 3:04-cr-00001-LC-MD Document 156 Filed 11/02/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 3:04cr1/LAC

change in her address. The court has verified through the Bureau of Prisons website that

the defendant was released on October 13, 2006.

 Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That the defendant’s 2255 motion be dismissed without prejudice due to her failure

to keep the court apprised of her current address and failure to prosecute this action. 

At Pensacola, Florida, this 2nd day of November, 2006.

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within ten

days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear on the

electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not control. A copy

of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858

F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case 3:04-cr-00001-LC-MD Document 156 Filed 11/02/06 Page 2 of 2
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2219

_____________________________

LYNDA LORRAINE ROBERTSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

March 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# L_2013323EN.01000101.xml

| 4.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 323/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 323/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1240/2013

of 25 November 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 180, 26.6.2013, p. 17.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

UNITED KINGDOM

Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes (PGI)

---
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
UNDER SECTION 906





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Lateral Media, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
Annual Report for the year ended June 30, 2009 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





Dated:
      October 13, 2009
                  /s/ Charles BentzCharles
      BentzChief Financial
      Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




Dated:
      October 13, 2009
                    /s/ Charles BentzCharles
      BentzChief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 1:00cr15-SPM

WILLIAM H. BLACK, JR.

____________________________/

ORDER QUASHING SUBPOENA AND DENYING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION

This cause comes before the Court on the Motion to Quash Subpoena

(doc. 1326) filed by Attorney Robert O. Bragdon. The subpoena is invalid

because it provided Attorney Bragdon less than 14 days to comply and required

him to travel more that 100 miles. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c)(3). Attorney Bragdon

also claims the information requested in privileged and the Government has not

demonstrated that an exception or waiver applies.

In response to the Motion to Quash Subpoena, the Government has filed

a motion to compel Attorney Bragdon to produce the materials. To compel

disclosure, “[a] motion for an order to a nonparty must be made in the court

where the discovery is or will be taken.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(2); see also Fed.

R. Civ. P. 45(a)(2)(c) (subpoena for production or inspection not including
Page 2 of 2

attendance must issue from the district where production or inspection is to be

made). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. The Motion to Quash Subpoena (doc. 1326) is granted. The

subpoena is quashed.

2. The Governments Motion (doc. 1329) for order to compel is denied. 

The denial is without prejudice to the Government’s opportunity to pursue means

of discovery in aid of execution as authorized by Federal laws and rules. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of January, 2011.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 1:00cr15-SPM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Shelter Properties VII Limited Partnership 1998 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000758009
<NAME> SHELTER PROPETIES VII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998   
<CASH>                                           1,041
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      199
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          21,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,538)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,798   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         10,979     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,410    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,798    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,962    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,715    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 668    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       247     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    17.53<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
Case 4:20-cv-00442-AW-MAF   Document 1-1   Filed 09/10/20   Page 1 of 10

Case 4:20-cv-00442-AW-MAF   Document 1-1   Filed 09/10/20   Page 2 of 10

Case 4:20-cv-00442-AW-MAF   Document 1-1   Filed 09/10/20   Page 3 of 10

Case 4:20-cv-00442-AW-MAF   Document 1-1   Filed 09/10/20   Page 4 of 10

Case 4:20-cv-00442-AW-MAF   Document 1-1   Filed 09/10/20   Page 5 of 10

Case 4:20-cv-00442-AW-MAF   Document 1-1   Filed 09/10/20   Page 6 of 10

Case 4:20-cv-00442-AW-MAF   Document 1-1   Filed 09/10/20   Page 7 of 10

Case 4:20-cv-00442-AW-MAF   Document 1-1   Filed 09/10/20   Page 8 of 10

Case 4:20-cv-00442-AW-MAF   Document 1-1   Filed 09/10/20   Page 9 of 10

Case 4:20-cv-00442-AW-MAF   Document 1-1   Filed 09/10/20   Page 10 of 10
#### § 623.20 Appeals.

A participant in the EWRP may obtain a review of any administrative determination concerning land eligibility, development of a WRPO, or any adverse determination under this part in accordance with the administrative appeal regulations provided in part 614 of this title.

[60 FR 67316, Dec. 29, 1995]
§ 654.40 Responsibility for operation and maintenance. ( a ) *Non-Federal lands.* The need for an O&M agreement will be determined by the State Conservationist. Where an O&M agreement is necessary, the sponsor(s) will provide the O&M and adopt standards for Federal grant property (34 CFR part 256). Where no O&M agreement is necessary, other arrangements will be made for complying with Federal property management.
( b ) *Federal lands.* The Federal agency administering the Federal land is responsible for operating and maintaining emergency measures installed on Federal land.
52.236-27 Site Visit (Construction).

As prescribed in 36.523 , insert a provision substantially the same as the following:

Site Visit (Construction) (Feb 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and

Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this

solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the

work will be performed.

(b) Site visits may be arranged during normal duty hours by contacting:

Name: ____________________________________________

Address: __________________________________________ __________________________________________________

Telephone: ________________________________________

(End of Provision)

Alternate I (Feb 1995). If an organized site visit will be conducted, substitute a paragraph

substantially the same as the following for paragraph (b) of the basic provision:

(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for-

__________________________________________________ [Insert date and time]

(c) Participants will meet at-

__________________________________________________ [Insert location]

Parent topic: 52.236 [Reserved]
#### § 4279.162 Strategic economic and community development.

Applicants with projects that support the implementation of Strategic Community Investment Plans are encouraged to review and consider 7 CFR part 1980, subpart K, which contains provisions for providing priority to projects that support the implementation of Strategic Community Investment Plans on a multi-jurisdictional and multi-sectoral basis.

[85 FR 59395, Sept. 22, 2020]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 4:99cr81-RH/WCS

4:02cv365-RH/WCS

BRENDA M. MOLSBEE,

Defendant

_______________________________/

ORDER ASSESSING RULE 11 SANCTIONS

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 264), to which no objections have been filed. Under

all the circumstances, taking into account the facts established by this record as

well as the court’s knowledge of reasonable attorney’s fees in this district, I find

that a sanction in the amount set forth in the report and recommendation is

reasonable and is both necessary and sufficient to deter repetition of such conduct

by others similarly situated. Indeed, it is likely that, if a full evidentiary hearing

were conducted, the record would establish that reasonable attorney’s fees for the

time devoted to this matter would exceed the amount set forth in the report and

recommendation. Defendant’s failure to object to the report and recommendation

Case 4:99-cr-00081-RH-WCS Document 265 Filed 08/09/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:99cr81-RH/WCS and 4:02cv2365-RH/WCS

may evince her agreement with that conclusion. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the opinion

of the court. The clerk shall enter three separate judgments against defendant

Brenda M. Molsbee as follows: (1) $2,706.50 in favor of the United States, (2)

$1,875.00 in favor of Clyde Taylor, and (3) $1,875.00 in favor of George Blow. 

The clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED this 9th day of August, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:99-cr-00081-RH-WCS Document 265 Filed 08/09/05 Page 2 of 2
# L_2013349EN.01005901.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 349/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 349/59

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1400/2013

of 18 December 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Τοματάκι Σαντορίνης (Tomataki Santorinis) (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Greece’s application to register the name ‘Τοματάκι Σαντορίνης’ (Tomataki Santorinis) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Greece’s application to register the name ‘Τοματάκι Σαντορίνης’ (Tomataki Santorinis) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Τοματάκι Σαντορίνης’ (Tomataki Santorinis) should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Τοματάκι Σαντορίνης’ (Tomataki Santorinis) should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 167, 13.6.2013, p. 22.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

GREECE

Τοματάκι Σαντορίνης (Tomataki Santorinis) (PDO)

---