alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 11620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4539]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 
Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 
Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held on March 29, 2012, at 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, 10th 
floor, MacCracken Room.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Renee Butner, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, 
telephone (202) 267-5093; fax (202) 267-5075; email 
Renee.Butner@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), we are giving notice of a 
meeting of the Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 
Committee taking place on March 29, 2012, at the Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591. The 
Agenda includes:
    1. Commercial Air Tour Voluntary Accreditation Program Working 
Group.
    2. ARAC restructure:
    a. Draft charter and bylaws.
    b. Committee Manual revision--Process Improvement Working Group 
(PIWG) recommendations.
    3. Status Report from FAA on Rulemaking Prioritization Working 
Group (RPWG) recommendations.
    4. Status Reports from Assistant Chairs.
    5. Remarks from other EXCOM members.

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to the space 
available. The FAA will arrange teleconference service for individuals 
wishing to join in by teleconference if we receive notice by March 20. 
Arrangements to participate by teleconference can be made by contacting 
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 
Callers outside the Washington metropolitan area are responsible for 
paying long-distance charges.
    The public must arrange by March 20 to present oral statements at 
the meeting. The public may present written statements to the executive 
committee by providing 25 copies to the Executive Director, or by 
bringing the copies to the meeting.
    If you are in need of assistance or require a reasonable 
accommodation for this meeting, please contact the person listed under 
the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 17, 2012.
Pamela A. Hamilton-Powell,
Executive Director, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2012-4539 Filed 2-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1

5:95cr5029LAC - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. ELIAS RAYAS MEJIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs

ELIAS RAYAS MEJIA

Case No.5:95cr5029LAC

ORDER

Your document, PETITIONER’S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE, was

referred to the undersigned with the following deficiencies:

The document does not have a Certificate of Service as required by Rule

5(b) and (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, showing proper

service. The Certificate of Service did not indicate who was served.

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(C)(2) no reply memoranda shall be filed absent

 a showing of good cause and upon leave of the court.

Case is closed.

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the submitted hard copy of the document shall

be returned to you by the Clerk without electronic filing. 

DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of February, 2006.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:95-cr-05029-LC-GRJ Document 314 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 1
REFERENCE; AOT A32L003

- 14

APPENDIX 3

MLG SIDESTAY CARDAN PIN

– FLOW CHART
#### Crowder v. The State.

Appeal from Montgomery City Court. • ■

Tried before the Hon. A. D. Sayre.

No counsel marked as appearing for appellant.

William 0. Pitts, Attorney-General, for the State.

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for forgery. The bill of exceptions not only fails to state that it contains all. the evidence, but affirmatively shows that there was other evidence introduced on behalf of the State. The court holds that in this condition of the record, it will be presumed there was other evidence which justified the rulings of the court. The judgment of' conviction is affirmed.

Opinion by

Coleman, J.
#### § 63.108 Removal.

If the Secretary determines that any person appointed under this part fails or refuses to perform his or her duties properly or engages in acts of dishonesty or willful misconduct, the Secretary shall remove the person from office. A person appointed under this part or any employee of the Board may be removed by the Secretary if the Secretary determines that the person's continued service would be detrimental to the purposes of the Act.
§ 622.2 Scope. ( a ) To assist sponsors in preparing and carrying out watershed plans, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) shall conduct investigations and surveys, with the cooperation and assistance of other Federal agencies, to: ( 1 ) Determine the extent of watershed problems and needs, and
( 2 ) Set forth viable alternative solutions consistent with local, regional, and national objectives, including an alternative solution which makes the greatest net contribution to national economic development.
( b ) Alternatives will consist of either land treatment, nonstructural or structural measures, or combinations thereof that will help accomplish one or more of the authorized project purposes.
( c ) Authorized project purposes are watershed protection, conservation and proper utilization of land, flood prevention, agricultural water management including irrigation and drainage, public recreation, public fish and wildlife, municipal and industrial water supply, hydropower, water quality management, ground water supply, agricultural pollution control, and other water management.
( d ) After a final plan for works of improvement is agreed upon between NRCS and the sponsors and the approval processes are completed, NRCS will provide technical and financial assistance to install the project, subject to the availability of funds and the budgeting and fiscal policies of the President.
# 52.214-2 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.214 [Reserved]
#### § 51.58 Equipment.

All equipment used for receiving, washing, grading, packaging or storing shall be of such design, material and construction that it may be kept clean.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ERICA N. FOMBY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-275-AW-GRJ

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of 

Social Security, 

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s February 22, 2021 Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 4, to which no objection has been filed. 

I agree with the magistrate judge and conclude Plaintiff has abandoned the 

litigation. I now adopt the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) and incorporate

it into this order. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed 

without prejudice for failure to prosecute.” The clerk will then close the file.

SO ORDERED on April 12, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00275-AW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 04/12/21 Page 1 of 1
§ 58.339 Containers. ( a ) Containers used for the packaging of butter and related products shall be commercially acceptable containers or packaging material that will satisfactorily protect the quality of the contents in regular channels of trade. Caps or covers which extend over the lip of the container shall be used on all cups or tubs containing two pounds or less, to protect the product from contamination during subsequent handling.
( b ) *Liners and wrappers.* Supplies of parchment liners, wrappers and other packaging material shall be protected against dust, mold and other possible contamination. ( 1 ) Prior to use, parchment liners for bulk butter packages shall be completely immersed in a boiling salt solution in a suitable container constructed of stainless steel or other equally non-corrosive material. The liners shall be maintained in the solution for not less than 30 minutes. The liners shall be effectively treated with a solution consisting of at least 15 pounds of salt for every 85 pounds of water and shall be strengthened or changed as frequently as necessary to keep the solution full strength and in good condition.
( 2 ) Other liners such as polyethylene shall be treated or handled in such a manner as to prevent contamination of the liner prior to filling.
( c ) *Filling bulk butter containers.* The lined butter containers shall be protected from possible contamination prior to filling. Use of parchment liners may be accomplished by alternately inverting one container over the other or stacking the lined boxes on their sides in a rack, until ready for use. When using polyethylene liners the boxes should be lined immediately prior to use. When packing butter into the bulk containers, care shall be taken to fill the corners leaving as few holes or openings as possible. The surface of the butter as well as the covering liner shall be smoothed evenly over the top surface before closing and sealing the container. Containers should be stacked only as high as the firmness of the product will support weight, so as not to crush or distort the container.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TROY LAMAR NORRIS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:21cv104-MCR-HTC

CAPTAIN STEARNS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on April 21, 2021 

(ECF Doc. 7). The Plaintiff was furnished with a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, I have 

determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:21cv104-MCR-HTC

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 7) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to 

prosecute and failure to comply a Court order.

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

Order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of May 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Deloitte
                  & Touche LLPSuite
                  1200695
                  Town Center DriveCosta
                  Mesa, CA92626-7188
                  USATel:+1
                  714 436 7100Fax:+1
                  714 436 7200www.deloitte.com
  **INDEPENDENT
        ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT**
 
 
 To
        Pacific Life Insurance Company:
 
 We
        have
        examined management's assertion that Pacific Life Insurance Company (the
        "Company") has complied as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, with
        its
        established minimum servicing standards described in the accompanying
        Management's Assertion dated February 16, 2007. Management is responsible
        for
        the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
        responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
        Company's compliance based on our examination.
 
 Our
        examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established
        by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
        included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
        with its minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures
        as we
        considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
        provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
        a
        legal determination on the Company's compliance with its minimum servicing
        standards.
 
 In
        our
        opinion, management's assertion that Pacific Life Insurance Company complied
        with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year
        ended
        December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the
        criteria set forth in Appendix A.
 
 This
        report is intended solely for the information and use of the Company, the
        master
        servicers to which the Company reports servicing information and their
        independent auditors, and investors in loans serviced by the Company and
        their
        independent auditors for their evaluation of the Company's compliance with
        applicable servicing agreements and is not intended to be and should not
        be used
        by anyone other than these specified parties.
 
 This
        report should not be included in or incorporated by reference into any public
        filing without notifying Pacific Life Insurance Company prior to its
        inclusion.
  /s/
                Deloitte & Touche LLP
              
              This
                report should not be included in orincorporated
                by reference into anyFebruary
                16, 2007
              
              public
                filing without notifying PacificLife
                Insurance Company prior to itsinclusion.
  Member
                  ofPacific
                  Southwest: Carlsbad Costa Mesa Las Vegas Los Angeles Phoenix Reno
                  San
                  Diego
              Deloitte
                  Touche Tohmatsu
#### State Division of Human Rights, on Complaint of Theresa I. Connell, Petitioner, v Canada Life Insurance Company of New York et al., Respondents.

— Order and determination unanimously confirmed,- without costs. (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Appellant. — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.
# L_2014311EN.01005401.xml

| 31.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 311/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/54

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2014/751/CFSP

of 30 October 2014

amending Decision 2010/573/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 27 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/573/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 27 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/573/CFSP (1).

| (2) | On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/573/CFSP, the restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova should be extended until 31 October 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/573/CFSP, the restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova should be extended until 31 October 2015.

| (3) | Decision 2010/573/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2010/573/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 4(2) of Decision 2010/573/CFSP is hereby replaced by the following:

‘2.   This Decision shall apply until 31 October 2015. It shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed or amended, as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2014.

For the Council

The President

S. GOZI

---

(1)  Council Decision 2010/573/CFSP of 27 September 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova (OJ L 253, 28.9.2010, p. 54).

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 232 (Friday, December 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30438]



[[Page 75469]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: December 8, 2010-10 a.m.

PLACE: 800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, 
Washington, DC.

STATUS: Part of the meeting will be in Open Session and the remainder 
of the meeting will be in Closed Session.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Open Session

1. Staff Update on Cruise West.
2. Initiative to Modernize Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Closed Session

1. Fact Finding No. 27: Complaints or Inquiries from Individual 
Shippers of Household Goods or Private Automobiles--Discussion of the 
Fact Finding Officer's Interim Report.
2. Fact Finding Investigation No. 26: Vessel Capacity and Equipment 
Availability in the United States Export and Import Liner Trades--
Discussion of the Fact Finding Officer's Final Report.
3. Petition No. P1-01: Petition of Hainan P O Shipping Co., Ltd., for 
an Exemption from the First Sentence of Section 9(c) of the Shipping 
Act.
4. Staff Briefing and Discussion Regarding Passenger Vessel Financial 
Responsibility.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 
523-5725.

[FR Doc. 2010-30438 Filed 12-1-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
*

Pursuant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40616 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
EMMETT RAY DONIHOO,
Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

(4:01-CR-44-20)

- - - - - - - - - - November 21, 2002 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Defendant-Appellant Emmett Ray Donihoo appeals the district

court’s application of U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) to increase his
offense level for possession of a weapon during and in connection

with the drug conspiracy for which he was convicted. He argues
that possession of a firearm by George Ruff, a coconspirator, was

not foreseeable to him, thus application of § 2D1 .1(b)(1) was

error.At sentencing, Sergeant Investigator Donald Fleming o f the

Texas Department of Public Safety Narcotics testified that during
surveillance of the methamphetamine “cook” site, he observed Ruff
walking around carrying a sawed-off shotgun in close proximity to
Donihoo and the other participants in the cook. It can fairly be

inferred from Donihoo’s proximity to Ruff whi le Ruff carried the

sawed-off shotgun that Donihoo was aware of the existence of the
shotgun as well as its use during the cook, i.e., in connection

with the conspiracy. Also, Donihoo’s admission to the probation

officer that he believed Ruff was a “rough type” who had guns made Ruff’s carrying of a weapon during the “cook” foreseeable, as did

the nature of the activit y of “cooking” methamphetamine. S ee
United States v. Martinez , 808 F.2d 1050, 1057 (5th Cir. 1987).

The court’s finding that Donihoo’s subseque nt retraction of his

admission was not credible was not clearly erroneous in light of the other evidence presented at sentencing and in the presentence
report. S ee United States v. Garza , 118 F.3d 278, 285 (5 th Cir.
1997).

The district court did not clearl y err in applying
§ 2D1.1(b)(1) to increase Donihoo’s sentence. See id

.
AFFIRMED.

H:\OPINIONS\02-\02-40616 scr.wpd 4/29/04 10:14 am
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ MOTIVE DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant

v.

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of

Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office,
Intervenor

______________________

2023

- 2375

______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022

- 00288, IPR2022

- 00289

.

______________________
O R D E R
The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that: (1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b). Case: 23-2375 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 12/18/2023M OTIVE D RILLING T ECHNOLOGIES
, I NC

. V

. V IDAL 2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

December 18, 2023 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 18, 2023 Case: 23-2375 Document: 17 Page: 2 Filed: 12/18/2023
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 25, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00978-CV CLARA HELMBRIGHT, Appellant V. SAM SAYED AND MAGED IBRAHIM, Appellees

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-01065-2018

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Pedersen, III, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Garcia Before the Court is appellant’s agreed motion to dismiss this appeal with
prejudice. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
42.1(a)(1).

210978F.P05 /Dennise Garcia/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

CLARA HELMBRIGHT, Appellant

No. 05-21-00978-CV V.

SAM SAYED AND MAGED IBRAHIM, Appellees On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-01065- 2018. Opinion delivered by Justice Garcia. Justices Myers and Pedersen, III participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice.

It is ORDERED that each party bear his or her own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered August 25, 2022.
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS
ANA LUI SA PENA SOTO ROMERO, Appellant,
v. ROBERT ROMERO, Appellee
. § § § § § § No. 08-10-00316- CV

Appea l from the 285th J udicial District Court of B exar County , Texas (TC# 2009-CI -16404)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION Pending be fore the Court is Appellant’s motion to dism iss this appea l. We gr ant the motion and dismi ss the appea l with prejudice. See T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1(a)( 1). Costs are a ssessed ag ainst Appellant. See T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1(d).

J anuar y 12, 2011 DAVI D WEL L I NGTON CHEW, C hief Just ice Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ
.
#### § 61.41 Unlicensed persons must not represent themselves as licensed samplers.

No person shall in any way represent himself to be a sampler licensed under the act unless he holds an unsuspended and unrevoked license issued thereunder.
# 27.203 Security requirements for patent applications containing classified subject matter.

- 27.203-1 General. 
- 27.203-2 Contract clause. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 27.2 - Patents and Copyrights