alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SERVED JANUARY 25,2010

r' "",**,-~** -1', 

### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS.

WASHINGTON, D.C.

IN THE MATTER OF DARBYAVIATION, Respondent. FAA DOCKET NO. CP08S00026 (Civil Penalty Proceeding) DMS NO. FAA-2008-1192
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING
For good cause shown, and with the consent ofcounsel for the Complainant, the Respondent's motion to postpone the hearinginthis case is granted. The hearing will begin at 10:00 a.m. onMarch 15,2010 in the hearing room oftheDepartment, Room EI2-300, 1200 New JerseyAvenue, S.E., Washington, D.C. This is a change ofvenue for the hearing. Please allow for the time it will take counsel and the witnesses to pass through security atthe Department's headquarters.
. This is the second, and last, postponement ofthe hearing that will be granted.

# /~L?jL Isaatb.'Sfnkin Administrative Law JudgeFAA Docket No. CP08S00026 (Civil Penalty Action) UPDATED SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COpy
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlO001 

### ONE COpy Deanna 

### L. Weidner, Respondent's Counsel Anderson & Associates, LLC 505 20th Street North Financial Center, Suite 1450 Birmingham, AL 35203 TEL: 205-324-1230 FAX: 205-322-3890 E-MAIL: dlweidner@davidbandersonlaw.com Raymond Veatch, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave. S.W. Washington DC 20591 TEL: 202-267-9676 E-MAIL: Raymond.Veatch@faa.gov The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 Washington, DC 20590 TEL: Attorney 202-366-2139 Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536 E-MAIL: David.Benkin@dot.gov

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing DocketCJerk, AGC-430. I
§ 54.1008 How to obtain service. ( a ) *Application.* Any person may apply to the Chief for service under the regulations with respect to equipment or utensils in which the applicant is financially interested. The application shall be made on a form approved by the Chief. In any case in which the service is intended to be furnished at an establishment not operated by the applicant, the applicant shall be responsible for obtaining approval for accessability of the equipment or utensil from the operator of such establishment and such approval shall constitute an authorization for any employees of the Department to enter the establishment for the purpose of performing their functions under the regulations. The application shall state: ( 1 ) The name and address of the establishment at which service is desired;
( 2 ) The name and post office address of the applicant;
( 3 ) Identification of the party that will be responsible for payment of all services rendered in response to the request;
( 4 ) The type of equipment or utensil presented for evaluation;
( 5 ) The date(s) on which service is requested to be performed; and
( 6 ) The signature of the applicant (or the signature and title of the applicant's representative) and date of the request.
( b ) *Notice of eligibility for service.* The applicant for service will be notified whether the applicant's application is approved.
EXHIBIT 32





NEW AMERICA ENERGY CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of New America Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rick Walchuk, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: December 14, 2011
By:
/s/Rick WalchukName:
Rick WalchukTitle:
Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Director





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0767. DENISE QUINLAN v. CHATTAHOOCHEE POOLS, INC. et al.

The Appellant’s Motion For Permission To Withdraw filed in the above-styled

case is hereby GRANTED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

January 02, 2018

01/02/2018
#### § 58.237 Condensed surge supply.

Surge tanks or balance tanks if used between the evaporators and dryer shall be used to hold only the minimum amount of condensed product necessary for a uniform flow to the dryers. Such tanks holding product at temperatures below 150 °F. shall be completely emptied and washed after each 4 hours of operation or less. Alternate tanks shall be provided to permit continuous operation during washing of tanks.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ Terry A. PetersonTerry A. PetersonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

February 10, 2006

Mr. Christopher Tramonte

Tramonte &  Associates

Wortham Tower, Suite 1815

2727 Allen Parkway

Houston, TX 77019

Mr. Michael H. Bagot

Wagner & Bagot

650 Poydras Street, Ste. 2660

New Orleans, LA 70130

Mr. H. Dwayne Newton

Nelson McCormick Hancock & Newton

1900 W. Loop South Ste. 700

Houston, TX 77027

Mr. Sam Baxter

McKool Smith, P.C.

P.O. Box O

Marshall, TX 75671

RE:Case Number:  06-0020

Court of Appeals Number:  

Trial Court Number:  99-0199-1

Style:IN RE  LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas lifted the stay order in the above-referenced petition for writ of mandamus.  The temporary injunction pendente lite granted January 18, 2006 is lifted.

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Case No. 06-0020Page 1
#### § 52.810 Allowances for quality factors.

Table I—Allowances for Quality Factors

| Factor | Sample unit size | Maximum number permissible for the respective grade | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| A | B | C |
| Color: | | | | |
| Vary markedly or undercolored. | 100 cherries | 12 | 18 | 25. |
| Pits | 20 ozs | Not more than 2 in any sample unit. Sample average 1 per 40 ozs | Not more than 3 in any sample unit. Sample average 1 per 30 ozs | 4 or more in any sample unit. Sample average 1 per 20 ozs. |
| Defects: | | | | |
| Total-mutilated, minor blemished, and blemished of which | 100 cherries | 10 | 15 | 20. |
| Blemished—limited to | | 3 | 7 | 15. |
| Harmless extraneous material | 20 ozs | Average 1 piece per 60 oz. net contents | Average 1 piece per 40 oz. net contents | Average 1 piece per 20 oz. net contents. |
52.203-5 Covenant Against Contingent Fees.       As prescribed in 3.404, insert the following clause:          Covenant Against Contingent Fees (May 2014)                                       (a) 						            The Contractor warrants that no person or agency has been employed or retained to solicit or obtain this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a contingent fee, except a bona fide employee or agency. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Government shall have the right to annul this contract without liability or, to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of the contingent fee.                                          (b) 						            "Bona fide agency," as used in this clause, means an established commercial or selling agency, maintained by a contractor for the purpose of securing business, that neither exerts nor proposes to exert improper influence to solicit or obtain Government contracts nor holds itself out as being able to obtain any Government contract or contracts through improper influence.                *Bona fide employee*, as used in this clause, means a person, employed by a contractor and subject to the contractor’s supervision and control as to time, place, and manner of performance, who neither exerts nor proposes to exert improper influence to solicit or obtain Government contracts nor holds out as being able to obtain any Government contract or contracts through improper influence.                *Contingent fee*, as used in this clause, means any commission, percentage, brokerage, or other fee that is contingent upon the success that a person or concern has in securing a Government contract.                *Improper influence*, as used in this clause, means any influence that induces or tends to induce a Government employee or officer to give consideration or to act regarding a Government contract on any basis other than the merits of the matter.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.203 [Reserved]
**EXHIBIT 33.1**

**REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA**

St.George Bank Limited (the “**Asserting Party”**) is responsible for assessing compliance as of September 30, 2006 and for the period from September 21, 2006 (the date of issuance of the Crusade Global Trust No. 2 of 2006 transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through September 30, 2006 (the “**Reporting Period”**) with the servicing criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “**CFR”**), except for criteria 229.1122(d)(1)(iii)-(iv), 229.1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii), 229.1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 229.1122(d)(4)(i)-(iii), 229.1122(d)(4)(x)-(xii) and 229.1122(d)(4)(xv) in the CFR, which the Asserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the asset-backedsecurities transactions covered by this report (the “**Applicable Servicing Criteria”**).  The transactions covered by this report include asset-backed securities transactions for which the Asserting Party served as servicer that are backed by the same asset type backing the class of asset-backed securities of the Crusade Global Trust No. 2 of 2006 (including the Crusade Global Trust No. 2 of 2006 asset-backed securities transaction), that were completed on or after January 1, 2006 and that were registered with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the “**Platform**”).

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of September 30, 2006 and for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

KPMG, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of September 30, 2006 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assessment.

St.George Bank Limited

/s/  Paul Fegan

Paul Fegan

Group Executive

Date:  20 December 2006

----
EXHIBIT 99 (b) 
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Canandaigua National Corporation for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence A. Heilbronner, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

May 13, 2003 
/s/ Lawrence A. Heilbronner
Date 
Lawrence A. Heilbronner, Principal Financial and   
Accounting Officer

 

 **
52.247-44 F.o.b. Designated Air Carrier’s

Terminal, Point of Importation.

As prescribed in 47.303-16(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when the

delivery term is f.o.b. designated air carrier’s terminal, point of importation:

F.o.b. Designated Air Carrier’s Terminal, Point of Importation (Apr 1984)

(a) The term "f.o.b. designated air carrier’s terminal, point of importation," as used in this clause,

means free of expense to the Government delivered to the air carrier’s terminal at the point of

importation specified in the contract.

(b) The Contractor shall-

(1)

(i) Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or

(ii) In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment for air transportation in conformance with

carrier requirements to protect the goods;

(2) Prepare and distribute bills of lading or air waybills;

(3)

(i) Deliver the shipment in good order and condition to the point of delivery specified in the contract;

and

(ii) Pay and bear all charges incurred up to the point of delivery specified in the contract, including

transportation costs; export, import, or other fees or taxes; cost of landing, if any; customs duties;

and costs of certificates of origin, consular invoices, or other documents that may be required for

exportation or importation; and

(4) Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods until delivery of the goods to the

Government at the designated air carrier’s terminal.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

SEAL4SAFTI, INC.,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL PRODUCTS CO., Defendant

- Appellee

______________________ 2023

- 1120

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:20

- cv
- 10409

- MCS

JEM, Judge Mark C. Scarsi.

-------------------------------------------------- In re : CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL PRODUCTS CO., Defendant

- Appellant

______________________ 2023

- 1140

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:20

- cv
- 10409

- MCS

JEM, Judge Mark C. Scarsi.

______________________ Case: 23-1120 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 03/16/2023IN RE : CA LIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL PRODUCTS CO

. 2

ON MOTION

______________________ O R D E R Seal4Safti, Inc. , (“S4S”), mo ves to voluntarily dismiss its A ppeal No. 2023

- 1120 pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Proced ure 42(b)

. California Expanded Metal Products Co. , (“CEMCO”), responds stating that “[n]otwithstanding S4S’s dismissal of its appeal, CEMCO intends to proceed on its cross

- appeal.” ECF No. 14 at 2. S4S states that it will not participate in CEMCO’s cros s
appeal No. 2023

- 1140. ECF No. 16 at 1. Upon consideration thereof, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) S4S’s motion is granted to the extent that Appeal No. 2023

- 1120 is dismissed. The official captions and short caption for Appeal No. 2023

- 1140 are revised as reflected above. (2) The parties shall bear their own costs with respect to the dismissal of Appeal No. 2023

- 1120. (3) CEMCO’s opening brief in Appeal No. 2023

- 1140 is due no later than sixty days from the date of filing of this order and the appendix is due no later than twenty

- one days thereafter

.

March 16 , 2023 Date F OR THE C OURT
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court ISSUED AS A MANDATE ( as to Appeal No. 2023

- 1120): March 16, 2023 Case: 23-1120 Document: 17 Page: 2 Filed: 03/16/2023
#### In the Matter of the Claim of George Rado, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Gabrielli, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that he was not totally unemployed, that he made willful misrepresentations to obtain benefits and further determined that claimant had been overpaid, which payment was declared recoverable. Prior to and during the periods for which claimant filed for benefits, he was the organizer, sole stockholder and president of a landscaping firm known as Able Lawn and Landscaping Service, Inc. Although he was employed on a seasonal basis for another firm, the record shows he performed substantial and important services for his own corporation including solicitation of business, management and general operation of the business. In addition, it appears that the income from his corporation rose from $2,700 during the first year for which he applied for benefits to an estimated $6,000 during the next year, for which he applied for benefits. Claimant, in filing for benefits, replied in the negative to a question as to whether he was an officer or stockholder in any corporation and as to whether he was self-employed. A footnote on the questionnaire defined self-employed as *‘‘*Do you do any work that brings you income or may bring income in the future?” In circumstances such as these, corporate officers are not totally unemployed during periods of seasonal inactivity *(Matter of Reitman*[Catherwood], 27 A D 2d 678; *Matter of Vasquenz [Cather*wood], 26 A D 2d 859; *Matter of Newman*[Catherwood], 24 A D 2d 1042). The board’s findings that claimant was not totally unemployed and that he willfully made false statements to obtain benefits, are substantiated by the record. These factual determinations made by the board will not be disturbed (Labor Law, § 623; *Matter of Martino*[Catherwood], 24 A D 2d 772). The determination that the overpayment made and penalty imposed are likewise substantiated (Labor Law, § 594; *Matter of Marder*[Catherwood], 16 A D 2d 303; *Matter of Bailey*[Catherwood], 18 A D 2d 727). Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Gabrielli, J.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Geopulse Exploration, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2011 (the "Report"), I, Massimiliano Farneti, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Massimiliano Farneti, Massimiliano Farneti, Chief Executive Officer  March 9, 2011
The KidsWalk-to-School page has moved.

Please click here.
52.236-4 Physical Data.       As prescribed in 36.504, insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract is contemplated and physical data (*e.g.,* test borings, hydrographic, weather conditions data) will be furnished or made available to offerors. All information to be furnished or made available to offerors before award that pertains to the performance of the work should be identified in the clause. When paragraphs are not applicable they may be deleted.          Physical Data (Apr 1984)          Data and information furnished or referred to below is for the Contractor’s information. The Government shall not be responsible for any interpretation of or conclusion drawn from the data or information by the Contractor.                                       (a) 						            The indications of physical conditions on the drawings and in the specifications are the result of site investigations by __________ [*insert a description of investigational methods used, such as surveys, auger borings, core borings, test pits, probings, test tunnels*].                                          (b) 						            Weather conditions __________ [*insert a summary of weather records and warnings*].                                          (c) 						            Transportation facilities _________ [*insert a summary of transportation facilities providing access from the site, including information about their availability and limitations*].                                          (d)                   ___________ [*insert other pertinent information*].                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.236 [Reserved]