alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RE:Uncontrolled NOx Rate for SCR Uncontrolled NOx Rate for SCR Uncontrolled NOx Rate for SCR -Colstrip Colstrip Colstrip1and2

Parker, Parker,James M James M James M to: Aaron Worstell 10/13/2011 03:05 PM

Cc: Vanessa Hinkle

From: "Parker, James M" <jmparker@pplweb.com>

To: Aaron Worstell/R8/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Vanessa Hinkle/R8/USEPA/US@EPA

Aaron - Your observation is correct. The "uncontrolled" Nox value in table 

2-3a should be 0.20 #/MMBtu. This change flows through to Table 2-3b, such 

that the cost of application is slightly lower because of lower reagent 

preparation equipment, urea, and other minor costs. The $/ton goes down from 

$7,405 to $7,300. We will revise the report accordingly and submit revised 

pages to you. Thank you for catching that inadvertent error, and my apologize 

for any confusion this may have caused.

Jim

406-237-6932

-----Original Message-----

From: Worstell.Aaron@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Worstell.Aaron@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 9:44 AM

To: Parker, James M

Cc: Hinkle.Vanessa@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Uncontrolled NOx Rate for SCR - Colstrip 1and 2

Hi JimI'm reviewing the IPM calculations for SCR in your September 2011 NOx control 

update for Colstrip Units 1 and 2. The "NOx Emiss Rate" in Table 2-3a is 

shown as 0.26 lb/MMBtu. In the following table, Table 2-3b, "Uncontrolled 

Emissions" are shown as 0.20 lb/MMbtu. Both tables address SCR reductions on 

a 30-day average emissions basis. Did you intend for the NOx emission rate in 

Table 2-3a to be 0.20 lb/MMBtu, reflecting installation of SOFA system?

Aaron J. Worstell

Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region 8 Air Program - Mail Code 8P-AR

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, CO 80202

Phone: 303-312-6073

Fax: 303-312-6064

The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal 

and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this 

message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering 

it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received 

this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or 

copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 

communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original 

message.
52.222-22 Previous Contracts and

Compliance Reports.

As prescribed in 22.810(a)(2), insert the following provision:

Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports (Feb 1999)

The offeror represents thatIt □ has, □ has not participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject to the Equal

Opportunity clause of this solicitation;

It □ has, □ has not filed all required compliance reports; and

Representations indicating submission of required compliance reports, signed by proposed

subcontractors, will be obtained before subcontract awards.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
# 52.222-39 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.222 [Reserved]
§ 54.1020 Appeal service; marking equipment or utensils on appeal; requirements for appeal; certain determinations not appealable. ( a ) Appeal service is a re-evaluation of the compliance of a piece of equipment, portion of a piece of equipment, or utensil to design or fabrication criteria according to the standards prescribed by this subpart.
( b ) Only the original applicant or their representative may request appeal service requesting a reevaluation of the original determination of the design and fabrication of the equipment or utensil for compliance with the standards specified in this subpart.
( c ) Appeal service will not be furnished for: ( 1 ) A piece of equipment, portion of a piece of equipment, or utensil which has been altered or has undergone a material change since the original service.
( 2 ) For the purpose of obtaining an up-to-date report or certificate which does not involve a question as to the correctness of the original service for the piece of equipment, portion of a piece of equipment, or utensil.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,248
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,248
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,375,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,450,338
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       486,275
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,561,365)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,375,248
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,312,758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,328,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,328,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,328,100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
§ 63.111 Prohibited activities. The Board may not engage in, and shall prohibit the employees and agents of the Board from engaging in: ( a ) Any action that is a conflict of interest under § 63.112;
( b ) Using funds to undertake any action for the purpose of influencing legislation or governmental action or policy, by local, State, national, and foreign governments, other than recommending to the Secretary amendments to the Order; and
( c ) Any activity that is false, misleading, or disparaging to another agricultural commodity.
52.210 [Reserved]

52.210-1 Market Research.

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**RESTATED OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

 
 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10–K of Washington Mutual Asset-Backed Certificates, WMABS Series 2006-HE3 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  LaSalle BankNational Association.

 

 

Date:  As of March 15,2007

 

 

/s/Thomas G. Lehmann

 

 

Name:  ThomasG. Lehmann

 

 

Title:   President and Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor
~A. R.I.') .A.IB.. INC. 

8991 Yandukin Drive 

Todd M. Homan 

Director. Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

Washington, D.C. 

Dear Mr. Homan: 

Re: Docket DOT-OST-2002-12014 

Juneau. AK 99801 

May 8, 2012 

Essential Air Service at Excursion Inlet, Alaska 

. ;· __ :_ ,. ·. 

.:.. .: : 

Ward Air, Inc. proposes to provide essential air service to Excursion Inlet, Alaska from 

Juneau, Alaska for the two year period from September 1, 2012 through August 31, 2014 

using either 4 passenger Cessna 206 aircraft or a 3 passenger Cessna 185 aircraft. The 

aircraft providing the service would be on wheels, floats or amphibious floats. Our float 

plane capability would ensure our ability to provide service year-round, except during 

extreme weather conditions, even when the airfield at Excursion Inlet is unusable due to 

heavy snow on the runway. 

Ward Air is a Part 135 business that has operated in southeast Alaska since 1993 under the 

current ownership. We provide reliable and safe service to individuals as well as a variety 

business and government agencies, including the US Forest Service, the US Department of 

Interior agencies, and State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game. We have also 

provided essential air service to Funter Bay, Alaska and Chatham, Alaska since 1995. 

Our proposed subsidy for the first year is $32,262 and $33,77 4 for the second year as 

reflected on the following spreadsheet. 

If you have any questions regarding our proposal please contact Ward Air's CFO Tom 

Williams at 907-789-0890 or by e-mail at Tom@WardAir.com. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

~~. ~ 

Edward K. Kiesel 

President 

Phone: (907) 789-9150 • Fax: (907) 789-7002 • Reservations@WardAir.com 
WARD AIR, INC. 

EAS PROPOSAL FOR SERVICE TO EXCURSION INLET 

As of May 8, 2012 

High Season 

Low Season 

Annual Total 

Weeks 

16 

36 

~ 

Cessna 206/185- Year 1 

Cessna 206/185 -Year 2 

RT Flights 

Weekly Total 

3 48 

1 36 

§i 

Rate 

429 

447 

3 Yr Ave Seat Fares & Freight PEQs 

Seat Fare Rate 

51 

74 

PEQ Revenue 3.774 

Proposed Subsidy 

EAS PropoSdl for Serwce to Excurs.on ln!fJI2012.{)$-08 Page 1 of 1 

1-Sep-12 

to 

31-Aug-13 

48 

36 

84 

36,036 

(3,774) 

32.262 

1-Sep-13 

to 

31-Aug-14 

48 

36 

84 

37,548 

(3.774) 

33.714
§ 58.705 Meaning of words. ( a ) *Pasteurized process cheese and related products.* Pasteurized process cheese and related products are the foods which conform to the applicable requirements of the Food and Drug Administration for cheeses and related cheese products (21 CFR part 133).
( b ) *Blend set up.* The trade term for a particular group of vat lots of cheese selected to form a blend based upon their combined ability to impart the desired characteristics to a pasteurized process cheese product.
( c ) *Cooker batch.* The amount of cheese and added optional ingredients placed into a cooker at one time, heated to pasteurization temperature, and held for the required length of time.
[40 FR 47911, Oct. 10, 1975. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 67 FR 48976, July 29, 2002]
§ 5001.207 Environmental responsibilities. Actions taken under this part must comply with 7 CFR part 1970. The Agency is responsible for ensuring that the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (under 40 CFR part 1500) and related compliance actions, such as Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (under 36 CFR part 800) and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, are met. The Agency will complete the appropriate level of environmental review in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970, “Environmental Policies and Procedures.” ( a ) *Borrower and lender responsibilities.* Both the borrower and lender must take into consideration the potential environmental impacts of the project at the earliest planning stages. The Agency recommends that the lender contact the Agency to determine environmental requirements as soon as practicable after deciding to apply for a guarantee under this part. ( 1 ) *Lender.* The lender is responsible for becoming familiar and ensuring compliance with Federal environmental requirements. The lender must alert the Agency to any environmental issues related to a project or items that may require extensive environmental review. Proposals that minimize the potential of any project to adversely impact the environment must be developed and provided upon request by the Agency.
( 2 ) The lender must ensure that the borrower has— ( i ) Provided the necessary environmental information to enable the Agency to undertake its environmental review process in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970, including the provision of all required Federal, State, and local permits;
( ii ) Not taken any actions or incurred any obligations with respect to the project that would either limit the range of alternatives to be considered during the Agency's environmental review process or which would have an adverse impact on the environment, such as the initiation of construction. Taking any such actions or incurring any such obligations could result in project ineligibility; and
( iii ) Complied with any environmental mitigation measures required by the Agency.
( b ) *Environmental reviews.* The Agency must complete all required environmental reviews, identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority populations and low-income populations, in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970. ( 1 ) The Agency may schedule a site visit if the Agency determines one is necessary in order to determine the scope of the environmental review.
( 2 ) The Lender must assist in the collection of additional data when the Agency needs such data to complete its environmental review of the project and mitigation of environmental issues.
52.214-14 Place of Performance-Sealed

Bidding.

As prescribed in 14.201-6(h), insert the following provision:

Place of Performance-Sealed Bidding (Apr 1985)

(a) The bidder, in the performance of any contract resulting from this solicitation, □ intends, □ does

not intend [check applicable box] to use one or more plants or facilities located at a different address

from the address of the bidder as indicated in this bid.

(b) If the bidder checks "intends" in paragraph (a) of this provision, it shall insert in the spaces

provided below the required information:

Place of Performance (Street Address, City,

State, County, ZIP Code)

Name and Address of Owner and Operator of

the Plant or Facility if Other than Bidder

____________________ ____________________

____________________ ____________________

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.214 [Reserved]
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Laurence S. Levy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
      Report of Hyde Park Acquisition Corp. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
      31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
      condition and results of operations of Hyde Park Acquisition Corp.





/s/
                Laurence S. Levy
            
            Dated:
                March 31, 2008Laurence
                S. LevyChairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)
#### § 56.13 Cancellation of license.

Upon termination of the services of a licensed grader, the grader's license shall be immediately surrendered for cancellation.

[71 FR 42008, July 24, 2006]
§ 54.1021 Request for appeal service. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in § 54.1020, an applicant or their representative may request appeal service when the applicant or their representative disagree with the determination as to compliance with the standard of the piece of equipment, portion of a piece of equipment, or utensil as documented in the applicable report.
( b ) A request for appeal service shall be filed with the Chief, directly or through the design review specialist who performed the original service. The request shall state the reasons for the disagreement with the original determination and may be accompanied by a copy of any previous certificate or report, or any other information which the applicant may have received regarding the piece of equipment, portion of a piece of equipment, or utensil at the time of the original service. Such request may be made orally (including by telephone) or in writing (including by facsimile transmission). If made orally, the Dairy Grading Branch employee receiving the request may require that it be confirmed in writing.
§ 62.202 How to apply for service. Applicants may apply for services authorized under this part by contacting the Administrator's office and requesting specific service or program information at USDA, AMS, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room 3069-S, Washington, DC 20250-0294; by fax to: (202) 720-5115, or email to: *AMSAdministratorOffice@usda.gov .* Applicants may also visit: *https://www.ams.usda.gov .*
#### § 51.1315 Carefully hand-picked.

*Carefully hand-picked* means that the pears do not show evidence of rough handling or of having been on the ground.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Albert L. Slater, Respondent, v Eastman Kodak Company, Appellant. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 29, 1979, which affirmed an award of compensation at the rate of $78.43 reduced earnings established for the period December 18, 1973 to October 5, 1976, with such payment to continue thereafter, based upon a finding that claimant has a 50% earning capacity resulting from a permanent partial disability causally related to industrial injuries to his back. The board majority found that "based on the entire record, particularly the testimony of Dr. Keller and the C-71 dated December 9, 1975 by Dr. Della Porta, claimant has a causally related permanent partial disability and the award was proper.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Conflicting medical evidence merely raises a factual issue, the resolution of which is solely for the board *(Matter of Haar v Straus-Duparquet, Inc.,*29 AD2d 726). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main and Mikoll, *JJ.,*concur; Staley, Jr., J., not taking part.
42.709-6 Waiver of the penalty.       The cognizant contracting officer shall waive the penalties at                 42.709-2(a) when—                                       (a) The contractor withdraws the proposal before the Government formally initiates an audit of the proposal and the contractor submits a revised proposal (an audit will be deemed to be formally initiated when the Government provides the contractor with written notice, or holds an entrance conference, indicating that audit work on a specific final indirect cost proposal has begun);                                          (b) The amount of the unallowable costs under the proposal which are subject to the penalty is $10,000 or less (*i.e.,* if the amount of expressly or previously determined unallowable costs which would be allocated to the contracts specified in                       42.709-1(b) is $10,000 or less); or                                          (c) The contractor demonstrates, to the cognizant contracting officer’s satisfaction, that-                                                         (1) It has established policies and personnel training and an internal control and review system that provide assurance that unallowable costs subject to penalties are precluded from being included in the contractor’s final indirect cost rate proposals (*e.g.,* the types of controls required for satisfactory participation in the Department of Defense sponsored self governance programs, specific accounting controls over indirect costs, compliance tests which demonstrate that the controls are effective, and Government audits which have not disclosed recurring instances of expressly unallowable costs); and                                                            (2) The unallowable costs subject to the penalty were inadvertently incorporated into the proposal; *i.e.,* their inclusion resulted from an unintentional error, notwithstanding the exercise of due care.    **Parent topic:** 42.709 Penalties for Unallowable Costs.