alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No.2 to Employment Arrangement with Joseph M. Tucci



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO EMPLOYMENT LETTER 
 This amendment (the “Amendment”) to the
Employment Letter (the “Employment Letter”) entered into as of November 28, 2007 and amended as of December 4, 2008 between EMC Corporation (“EMC”), and Joseph M. Tucci (the “Executive”), is made as of May 7,
2009. 
 WHEREAS, the Employment Letter provides that the Executive shall receive an annual base salary of $1,000,000 and a target incentive
bonus of $1,440,000 through December 31, 2010; and 
 WHEREAS, at the Executive’s request his 2009 annual base salary was reduced
by 10% to $900,000 and his 2009 target bonus incentive was reduced by 30% to $1,008,000, each effective January 1, 2009; and 
 WHEREAS,
at the Executive’s request and pursuant to a company-wide cost reduction initiative his 2009 annual base salary was reduced by a further 5% effective May 2, 2009; and 
 WHEREAS, in light of the above voluntary reductions, EMC has agreed that if the Executive becomes entitled to any severance payments pursuant to
Paragraphs 7(a) or (b) of the Employment Letter such severance shall be calculated without regard to the foregoing reductions; 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Paragraph 3 of the Employment Letter is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to provide as follows: 
 3. Your annual cash compensation through 2010 will consist of a base salary of $1,000,000 and a target bonus incentive of $1,440,000. However, for 2009,
at your request, (i) your annual base salary will be $900,000 through May 1st and $850,000 thereafter and (ii) your target bonus will be $1,008,000. Notwithstanding the foregoing voluntary reductions, any payments that are required to
be made pursuant to Paragraphs 7(a) or (b) of this Employment Letter will be calculated assuming that your base salary was $1,000,000 and your target bonus incentive was $1,440,000. 
 2. This Amendment shall be effective as of the date hereof. 
 3. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute the same document. 
 4. Except as modified by this Amendment, the Employment Letter is hereby confirmed in all respects. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered as of the date and the year first
written above. 
  

	
	EMC CORPORATION
	
	/s/ David N. Strohm
	 David N. Strohm
 Lead Director



  

	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	/s/ Joseph M. Tucci
	Joseph M. Tucci


  

 2
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-62,574-03
EX P ARTE JOHNNY GREEN JR., Appl icant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1199474-A IN THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT

F ROM TARRA NT COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convic t ed o f murder and sentenc ed to imprisonment for life. The E i ghth Court of Appea ls ref ormed the judgme nt but aff irmed his conviction. Gree n v. State , No. 08-11-00317- C R (Tex. App.—For t Worth Nov. 22, 2013) (not designated f

or publication). In a single gro un d , Applicant contends that he was denied his right to file a petition for discretionary revie w (PDR). The trial court enter ed finding s of fac t and conclusions of law and2

rec ommended that we grant Applica nt an out-of- time PDR. We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportuni ty to file an out-of-time PDR of the judgme nt of the Eighth Court of Appea ls in cause number 08-11-00317- CR that aff irmed his conviction in cause number 1199474D from the 372nd District Court of Tarr ant County
. Applicant shall file his PDR with this Court within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: J anuar

y 28, 2015 Do not publish
Joseph D. Barbera 

14706 NE Erickson Dr. 

La Center, WA 98629 

Tel: 360 263 5359 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings 

Washington, DC 

In the Matter of: Joseph D. Barbera 

FAA Case No. 2013NM090056 

FDMS No. FAA 2013-1083 

Judge Richard Goodwin 

RECEIVED 

OCT 0 2 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

Response to Complaintant's Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted and to 

Dismiss Appeal (dated 18 April 2014) 

It is true that I had inadvertently missed the 30 day window to answer the complaint. 

This resulted from a mistake in interpreting the date required. As an explanation, not 

an excuse, this is what happened: 

a) Received the Procedural Order dated 25 March. 

b) From this, I read " ... respond within 30 days ... " 

c) I incorrectly took this to be 30 days from the Procedural Order date, March 251

h 

d) I did respond on 21 April, within 30 days of the Procedural Order. 

This was the error of a layman, not an intention disregard for procedure, and I 

apologize for any inconvenience. 

•-ly ";;;;,' 25 Septem"", 2014 

Joseph arbera, Respondent 

1 
Service List 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

BOO Independence Ave. SW 

Washington D.C. 20591 

David Shayne, Complainant's Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave., SW 

Renton, WA 98057 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

2
**EXHIBIT 33.2**

**REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA**

St.George Custodial Pty Limited (the “**Asserting Party”**) is responsible for assessing compliance as of September 30, 2006 and for the period from September 21, 2006 (the date of issuance of the Crusade Global Trust No. 2 of 2006 transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through September 30, 2006 (the “**Reporting Period”**) with the servicing criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “**CFR”**), except for criteria 229.1122(d)(1), 229.1122(d)(2), 229.1122(d)(3) and 229.1122(d)(4)(iii)-(xv) in the CFR, which the Asserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions covered by this report (the“**Applicable Servicing Criteria”**).  The transactions covered by this report include asset-backed securities transactions for which the Asserting Party served as custodian that are backed by the same asset type backing the class of asset-backed securities of the Crusade Global Trust No. 2 of 2006 (including the Crusade Global Trust No. 2 of 2006 asset-backed securities transaction), that were completed on or after January 1, 2006 and that were registered with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the “**Platform**”).

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of September 30, 2006 and for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

KPMG, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of September 30, 2006 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assessment.

St.George Custodial Pty Limited

      /s/  Paul Fegan                     

Paul Fegan

Group Executive

Date:  20 December 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

*Time and Date:*                         12 p.m.—2 p.m., April 12, 2010 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Institutional Collaboration between Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Malaria, FOA CK10-002.”                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Gregory Anderson, M.S., M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E60, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: (404) 498-2293.                    

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: February 10, 2010.

Elaine L. Baker,

                        Director, Management Analysis and Services Office,                         *Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.*

[FR Doc. 2010-3049 Filed 2-17-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### § 65.125 Commingled covered commodities.

*Commingled covered commodities* means covered commodities (of the same type) presented for retail sale in a consumer package that have been prepared from raw material sources having different origins.
§ 51.2110 U.S. No. 1 Whole and Broken. “U.S. No. 1 Whole and Broken” consists of shelled almonds of similar varietal characteristics which are clean and well dried, and which are free from decay, rancidity, insect injury, foreign material, doubles, particles and dust, and free from damage caused by mold, gum, shriveling, brown spot or other means. ( a ) In this grade not less than 30 percent, by weight, of the kernels shall be whole. Doubles shall not be considered as whole kernels in determining the percentage of whole kernels.
( b ) Unless otherwise specified, the minimum diameter shall be not less than 20 ⁄ 64 of an inch (7.9 mm). (See §§ 51.2113 and 51.2114.)
( c ) In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, the following tolerances, by weight, shall be permitted: ( 1 ) *For dissimilar varieties.* 5 percent, including not more than one-fifth of this amount, or 1 percent, for bitter almonds mixed with sweet almonds;
( 2 ) *For doubles.* 35 percent;
( 3 ) *For foreign material.* Two-tenths of 1 percent (0.20 percent). No part of this percentage shall be allowed for glass and metal;
( 4 ) *For particles and dust.* One-tenth of 1 percent (0.10 percent);
( 5 ) *For undersize.* 5 percent; and,
( 6 ) *For other defects.* 5 percent, including not more than three-fifths of this amount, or 3 percent, for serious damage.
#### In re CLOWES.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Descent and Distribution (§ 34*)—Taxation (§ 889*)—Persons Entitled —Inheritance Taxes.

Decedent Estate Law (Consol. Laws, c. 13) § 98, subd. 5, providing, where there is no widow, child, or representatives of a child, personal property shall be distributed to the next of kin in equal degree, and for distribution to brothers and sisters and their descendants in equal degree, a niece and a grandnephew will take in exclusion of an aunt, and the burden of transfer taxes on the personalty of the deceased must be borne by them.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Descent and Distribution, Cent. Dig. 11 97-101; Dec. Dig. § 34;* Taxation, Cent. Dig. § 1710; Dec. Dig. § 889.*]

Appeal from Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County.

In the matter of the taxation of- the transfer tax on the property of Mary D. Clowes. From an order of the surrogate, modifying a previous order, Martin V. W. Hall, as administrator, appeals.

Order reversed, and matter remitted.

. Argued before JENKS, P. J., and BURR, RICH, STAPLETON, and PUTNAM, JJ.

Paul E. Mead, of New York City, for appellant.

George Wallace, of Jamaica, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep'r Indexes

JENKS, P. J.

The sole question- is as to the correctness of the apportionment of the transfer tax so far as the personal property is concerned. The parties affected are M. Duryea, an aunt of the half blood of the intestate,. H. Wood, a niece, and M.- Hall, a grandnephew. We are of opinion that the niece and the grandnephew take in exclusion of the aunt. See subdivision 5, § 98, of the Decedent Estate Law (Consol. Laws, c. 13), as interpreted in In re Butterfield’s Will, 161 App. Div. 506, 146 N. Y. Supp. 671, 180 N. Y. St. Rep. 671, affirmed June 3, 1914. The burden of the tax must be borne accordingly.

The order is therefore reversed, with $10 costs and- disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Surrogate’s Court of Nassau County. All concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30521]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / 
Notices

[[Page 75952]]



AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


U.S. Agency for International Mandatory Declassification Review 
Address

AGENCY: U.S. Agency for International Development.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Information Security Oversight Offices 
Classified National Security Information Directive No. 1, this notice 
provides the U.S. Agency for International Developments address to 
which Mandatory Declassification Review requests may be sent. This 
notice benefits the public in advising them where to send such requests 
for declassification review.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sylvia Lankford, 202-712-0879.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following identifies the office to which 
mandatory declassification review requests should be addressed: Acting 
Chief, Information and Records Division (M/MS/IRD), Office of 
Management Services, U.S. Agency for International Development, Ronald 
Reagan Building, Room 207C, Washington, DC 20523-2700.

    Dated: November 29, 2010.
Lynn P. Winston,
Acting Chief, Information and Records Division, Office of Management 
Services, Bureau for Management.
[FR Doc. 2010-30521 Filed 12-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
```

[107th Congress Public Law 284]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ284.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 2021]]

Public Law 107-284
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 4 East Central Street in Worcester, Massachusetts, as the ``Joseph D. 
  Early Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Nov. 6, 2002 -  [H.R. 5333]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4 East 
Central Street in Worcester, Massachusetts, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Joseph D. Early Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph D. Early Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved November 6, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5333:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            Sept. 17, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 17, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 58.217 Evaporators and/or vacuum pans.

Evaporators or vacuum pans or both, with open type condensers shall be equipped with an automatic condenser water level control, barometric leg, or so constructed so as to prevent water from entering the product. New or replacement units shall comply with the 3-A Sanitary Standards for Milk and Milk Products Evaporators and Vacuum Pans. When enclosed type condensers are used, no special controls are needed to prevent water from entering the product. Water collected from the condensing of product (cow water) in this equipment may be utilized for prerinsing and cleaning solution make-up; provided it is equipped with proper controls that will automatically divert water with entrained solids to the waste water system. “Cow water” shall not be used for acidified or final equipment rinse.
# L_2015084EN.01007302.xml

| 28.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 84/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 84/73

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 897/2013 of 22 July 2013 on the allocation of the fishing opportunities under the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Gabonese Republic

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 250 of 20 September 2013
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 250 of 20 September 2013

On page 25, in the signature:

for:

‘For the Council

The President

C. ASHTON’

,

read:

‘For the Council

The President

V. JUKNA’

.

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 74717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30207]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2010-0060]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Broker Registration Form, EIB 92-79.

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Our customers will be able to submit 
this form on paper or electronically.
    This application is used by insurance brokers to register with 
Export Import Bank. The application provides Export Import Bank staff 
with the information necessary to make a determination of the 
eligibility of the broker to receive commission payments under Export 
Import Bank's credit insurance programs.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before January 3, 2011 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments maybe submitted through http://www.Regulations.Gov 
or mailed to to Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20038 attn: OMB 3048-0024.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 92-79 Broker Registration Form.
    OMB Number: 3048-0024
    Type of Review: Regular
    Need and Use: This application is used by insurance brokers to 
register with Export Import Bank. The application provides Export 
Import Bank staff with the information necessary to make a 
determination of the eligibility of the broker to receive commission 
payments under Export Import Bank's credit insurance programs.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 50.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 100 hours.
    Government Annual Burden Hours: 200 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Once.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-30207 Filed 11-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P