alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_____________ _______________ _____________

_____________ _______________ _____________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129622 & (38) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices IN RE ESTATE OF JU NE LOUISA CUMMIN,
Deceased.

EDWARD MURPHY, Persona l Representative of
the Estate of JUNE LOUISA CUMMIN, Deceased, Petitioner-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant,

v SC: 129622 COA: 253594 Clare PC: 00-013321-SE BETH HEGYI, Respondent-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross

appellant are considered and, pursuant to M CR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that part of the judgment of the Court of Appeals that affirmed the probate court’s imposition of a constructive tr ust on the proceeds of respondent’s sale of the property at issue. Judg e Wilder correctly concluded in In re Estate of Cummin , 258 Mich App 402 (2003), that an agent may engage in self dealing if the principal consents and has knowledge of the details of the tr ansaction and the passage of time and the change in decedent’s mental status could not affect respondent’s auth ority to transfer the property if decedent had consented to the t ransaction with knowledge of its details. Id.

, pp 409-410. Judge Wilder also correctly concluded that the Estates and Protected Individuals Code (EPIC) prohibition against self-dealing, MCL 700.1214, does not apply because respondent had an accrued right in the property before EPIC took effect on April 1, 2000, MCL 700.8101(2)(d). Id. , p 408. Application of these conclusions to the probate court’s factual findings that respondent and her husband credibly testified that decedent requested respond ent to transfer the prop erty to herself, together with the lack of_______________________________________ __ 2

any evidence that decedent ev er changed her mind in that regard, preclude the imposition
of a constructive trust in favor of decedent’s estate. We RE MAND this case to the Clare Probate Court for further proceed ings consistent with this order. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is DENI ED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and W EAVER , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

s0419 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 26, 2006

Clerk
#### In the Matter of Charles Fischer, an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

June 3, 1980

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Nicholas C. Cooper*for petitioner.

*Herald Price Fahringer*of counsel *(Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Schuller & James,*attorneys), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

The respondent was admitted to practice at a term of the Appellate Division, First Department, on January 20, 1956.

On February 15, 1980, respondent was convicted after a jury trial in the Supreme Court, County of New York, of one count of criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law, § 215.51), a class E felony, and he was sentenced to 60 days incarceration.

By virtue of subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary *33Law, respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law of the State of New York at the moment of his conviction.

The petition to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys should be granted.

Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Fein, Sandler and Carro, JJ., concur.

Petition granted and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

GREGORY E. BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-292-RV/MJF

MCURRAY, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated March 16, 2021 (ECF No. 4). The parties have been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that 

the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915A(b)(1) for maliciousness and abuse of the judicial process.

Case 5:20-cv-00292-RV-MJF Document 5 Filed 04/22/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

5:20-cv-292-RV/MJF

3. The clerk of the court shall close the case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of April 2021.

s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00292-RV-MJF Document 5 Filed 04/22/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the accompanying Annual Report  of Portman Ridge Finance Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”), I, Edward Goldthorpe, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted  pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: March 6, 2020

  | By:    |   | /s/ EDWARD GOLDTHORPE                 |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                        |   |   | EDWARD GOLDTHORPE                     |
|                        |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                        |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
#### § 550.103 Eligibility.

REE Agencies may enter into a non-assistance cooperative agreements with eligible entities to further research, extension, or teaching programs in the food and agricultural sciences. Eligible entities are any State agricultural experimental station, State cooperative extension service, any college or university, other research or education institution or organization, Federal or private agency or organization, an individual, or other party, either foreign or domestic.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JENNIFER MARLIANA LAND,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5:21-cv-10-TKW-MJF

RICKY D. DIXON 

Respondent.

/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 15). No objections were filed. 

Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the case file, 

the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determinations that no evidentiary 

hearing is required for the disposition of this matter; that Petitioner is not entitled to 

habeas relief; and that a certificate of appealability is not warranted. Accordingly, it 

is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

Case 5:21-cv-00010-TKW-MJF Document 17 Filed 06/23/22 Page 1 of 2
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) challenging the 

judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Jennifer Marlaina Land, 

Washington County Circuit Court Case No. 2015-CF-284, is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The Clerk shall close the case file.

DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of June, 2022.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:21-cv-00010-TKW-MJF Document 17 Filed 06/23/22 Page 2 of 2
EPA REGISTRATION FILE #69117-1 VOLUME 4
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Lingle, Appellant.

Submitted September 4, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 34 AD3d 287.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3035]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee <greek-i>13883; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 
(<greek-i>13883).
    Date and Time: March 4, 2010, 12 p.m.-2 p.m. EST.
    Place: Teleconference. National Science Foundation, Room 320, 
Stafford I Building, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Craig B. Foltz, Acting Division Director, 
Division of Astronomical Sciences, Suite 1045, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-
292-4908.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 
on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of 
mutual interest and concern to the agencies.
    Agenda: To discuss the Committee's draft annual report due 15 
March 2009.

Susanne E. Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-3035 Filed 2-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
**Exhibit 35.1**

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE** 

            I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify to WaMu AssetAcceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of  September 1, 2006 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer, LaSalle Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee,  the following with respect to Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2006-AR8 Trustfor the 2006 fiscal year (the “Relevant Year”):

1.                  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has beenmade under my supervision.

 

2.                  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the ServicingAgreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year. 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

                                                                                                      /s/ H. John Berens

| ___________________________________________Name:  H. John BerensTitle:    Senior Vice President |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
52.218 [Reserved]

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
Form of Employee Nonqualified Option Award Letter



 Exhibit 10.18 
  
 [WESTLAKE LETTERHEAD] 
  
 August 16, 2004 
  
 [insert name] 
 [insert address] 
  
 Dear                     :

  
 Westlake Chemical Corporation (the “Company”) hereby grants to you
a nonqualified option (“Option”), effective August 16, 2004 (the “Award Date”), to purchase              shares of common stock of the Company (“Common
Stock”) in accordance with the Westlake Chemical Corporation 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). Your award is more fully described in the attached Appendix A, Terms and Conditions of Nonqualified Stock Option Award. 

 
 The price at which you may purchase the shares of Common Stock covered by the Option is
$14.50 (the “Grant Price”). Unless otherwise provided in the attached Appendix A, your Option will expire on the tenth anniversary of the Award Date (the “Expiration Date”), and will become exercisable in installments as follows
(the “Schedule”): 
  

			
	 Period Beginning

	 	 Number of Shares Purchasable


	 First anniversary of the Award Date
	 	1/3
	 Second anniversary of the Award Date
	 	1/3
	 Third anniversary of the Award Date
	 	1/3

  
 You must be in continuous employment
with the Company or one of its Subsidiaries (as defined in the Plan) from the Award Date through each date on which your Option becomes exercisable in order for your Option to become exercisable on such date. 
  
 Your award is subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the enclosed Plan, any
additional terms and conditions set forth in the attached Appendix A, the Prospectus for the Plan and any rules and regulations adopted by the Plan’s Administrator (as defined in the Plan). 
  
 This award letter and the attachments contain the formal terms and conditions of your award
and accordingly should be retained in your files for future reference. 
  
 Very
truly yours, 
  
 Albert Chao 
 President and Chief Executive Officer 
  
 Enclosures
EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002George W. Hamlin, IV, President and Chief Executive Officer and Lawrence A. Heilbronner, Chief Financial Officer, of Canandaigua National Corporation (the "Company"), each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008, and that to the best of his knowledge:  (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Company.The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.May 8, 2008/s/ George W. Hamlin, IV/s/ Lawrence A. HeilbronnerGeorge W. Hamlin, IVLawrence A. HeilbronnerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

|   |  (1) |   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|-----------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |      |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|   |  (2) |   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| Dated:      March 15, 2010  | By:   | /s/      Ronald Schad                                                |   |
|----------------------------------|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                             |            | Ronald      Schad                                               |   |
|                             |            | Chief      Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer)  |   |

| Dated:      March 15, 2010  | By:   | /s/      Martin Kroll                                                |   |
|----------------------------------|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                             |            | Martin      Kroll                                               |   |
|                             |            | Chief      Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer)  |   |

----
CAPITAL REGION AIRPORT AUTHORITY 

siimiQF 

Chris Holman 

Chairman 

Dick Baker 

Troy Brown 

Victor Celentino 

Todd Cook 

Paul Hufnagel 

Roberr F. Selig, AAE 

Executive Director 

February 2, 2012 ' r-^ 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Sun Country Slot Exemption - Docket Number FAA-2012-0089 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

The Capital Region Airport Authority fully supports the Sun Country Airlines' request 

for an exemption from the slot limit for Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport 

(DCA) set forth in § 93.123(a), to permit the FAA to create air carrier slots during 

certain limited hours for Sun Country's use. The proposed air carrier slots would 

replace two slot exemptions under DOT Order 2010-12-16 awarded to Sun Country, 

On January 6, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia 

Circuit vacated the DOT Order, and Sun Country will lose its existing service between 

DCA and Lansing's Capital Region International Airport. Specifically, Sun Country 

desires one daily slot during each of the 1000 and 1100 hours. The proposed 

exemption would permit Sun Country to continue operating its existing services and 

avoid an inequitable result of the Court's order. 

The Sun Country service to Reagan Washington Airport (DCA) has had a significant 

economic impact on the Airport. Average passenger boardings at the Airport have 

been approximately $3,000 passengers per month. Accordingly, the increased 

revenue to the Capital Region International Airport from this Sun Country service 

could reach $700,000 per year. In turn the Airport Authority has expended 

approximately $300,000 in marketing and advertising to promote the new service. 

The Sun Country DCA service is essential to the economic growth of the Greater 

Lansing Region. The daily service is the only large aircraft (737-800) service to 

Washington Reagan Airport, in the state of Michigan outside of Detroit. Prior to Sun 

Country, the regional community had requested the introduction of this service from 

numerous other airline operators without success. Accordingly, it is critical that the 

FAA take the necessary steps to ensure the continuation of the Sun Country slots at 

the established flight times in support of Greater Lansing's business and economic 

growth. 

Your immediate approval of this exemption, so that Sun Country can begin to enter 

flights schedules for sale for the balance of 2012, will be greatly appreciated. 

Sincerely, 

J, AAE 

Executive Director 

Capital Region International Airport •410 0 Capital City Blvd. • Lansing, Michigan 48906 • 517-321-6121 • Fax 517-321-6197 

WW vv.llyluii.sing.com
#### § 58.144 Pasteurization or ultra-pasteurization.

When pasteurization or ultra-pasteurization is intended or required, or when a product is designated “pasteurized” or “ultra-pasteurized” every particle of the product shall be subjected to such temperatures and holding periods in approved systems as will assure proper pasteurization or ultra-pasteurization of the product. The heat treatment by either process shall be sufficient to insure public health safety and to assure adequate keeping quality, yet retaining the most desirable flavor and body characteristics of the finished product.
#### Jonathan Sussman, Appellant-Respondent, v Kathryn H. Sussman, Respondent-Appellant. Respondent-Appellant.

In a matrimonial action, the parties cross-appeal, as limited by their notices of appeal and briefs, from stated portions of a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 21, 1979, which, *inter alia,*(a) awarded the plaintiff husband custody of the parties’ infant son; (b) denied the defendant wife custody of and support for said infant; (c) awarded the defendant wife, in connection with custody of the parties’ infant daughter, (i) child support in the sum of $300 per week; (ii) private school tuition for said infant; and (iii) certain openended items of support including medical, dental, psychiatric and counseling expenses for said infant. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by modifying the ninth decretal paragraph thereof by reducing the amount of child support for Rachel Faith Sussman to $200 per week and by deleting the tenth decretal paragraph thereof. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as *523appealed from, without costs or disbursements. On the record before us the amount awarded for Rachel’s support was excessive to the extent indicated. Furthermore, there was no basis for imposing the cost of private school tuition or medical, dental and psychiatric treatment costs upon the plaintiff (see *Matter of Carter v Carter,*58 AD2d 438; *Gamble v Gamble,*71 AD2d 649). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Martuscello and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Class ActivitiesComputer Assisted InstructionEducational ResourcesElementary Secondary EducationGovernment PublicationsGrantsInformation NetworksInformation PolicyInformation SourcesInstructional MaterialsInternetLesson PlansLibrary Catalogs

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Case No. 3:20cr70-TKW

BARRY D. HARRELSON

/

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of the 

Defendant, BARRY D. HARRELSON, to Count One, Count Two, Count Three, 

Count Four, Count Five, and Count Six of the Indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. 

All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of January, 2021. 

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00070-TKW Document 53 Filed 01/13/21 Page 1 of 1
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 13, 

2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00603-CR

CONRAD JEROME MORGAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 432nd District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1260983D

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A written request to withdraw the notice of appeal in this case, personally signed 

by appellant, has been filed with this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2. Because this 

Court has not delivered an opinion, we grant appellant's request.

Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed. We direct the Clerk of the Court to 

issue the mandate of the Court immediately.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce, and McCally.

Do Not Publish - TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)