alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Muldoon, Albert (OST)

From: Joel A. Martin <jamartin@starband.net>

Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 6:17 PM

To: Muldoon, Albert (OST)

Subject: Requests for Comments, EAS Proposals for Chatham and Funter Bay

Attachments: Essential Air Service, Chatham and Funter Bay.pdf

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Good Afternoon:

As residents of Funter Bay the past eighteen years, it appears we should comment on the EAS proposals, as you request.

I have attached a copy of a letter sent to Bernard Calure, EAS & Domestic Analysis, dated 17 February, 1996. The

comments expressed in that message remain the same today with exception that we are now retired, doing consulting

work via the Internet and traveling somewhat less. Ward Air, Inc. has continued to provide the same level of service

mentioned in that letter, to Funter Bay.  

We remain concerned that a change to any other air service would be most difficult for us. In addition to the comments

about Ward Air’s charter service expressed in our earlier letter,  I would  add that their pilots are thoroughly familiar

with the vagaries of negotiating Funter Bay’s weather variables, winter or summer, and in our case the fact that we

utilize three specific beach landing sites depending on the tides. (NOAA would list our rocky beach as ‘foul’).

We ask that you choose to continue with the same EAS provider.

Best regards,

Joel Martin and Patricia  Woods

The Pyxis Enterprise

Electrical Systems Technology

1 South Shore Place

Funter Bay, AK  

907‐723‐7365

jamartin@starband.net
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, Paul E. Martin, the Principal Financial Officer of Enstar Income Program II-2, L.P. (the "Partnership") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

- fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Paul E. MartinPaul E. MartinChief Financial OfficerMay 15, 2003
# L_2014027EN.01000101.xml

| 30.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 27/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 27/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 28 January 2014

on the conclusion of the revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union

(2014/44/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a)(v) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Council Decision 2013/523/EU (1), the revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union (the ‘revised MoU’) was signed on 21 October 2013, subject to its conclusion at a later date. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Council Decision 2013/523/EU (1), the revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union (the ‘revised MoU’) was signed on 21 October 2013, subject to its conclusion at a later date.

| (2) | The revised MoU should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The revised MoU should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.

The text of the revised MoU is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the dayof its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 28 January 2014.

For the Council

The President

G. STOURNARAS

---

(1)  Council Decision 2013/523/EU of 18 October 2013 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union (OJ L 282, 24.10.2013, p. 35).

1

---
51.107 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.251-1, Government Supply Sources, in

solicitations and contracts when the contracting officer authorizes the contractor to acquire supplies

or services from a Government supply source.

Parent topic: Subpart 51.1 - Contractor Use of Government Supply Sources
#### § 56.19 Prerequisites to grading.

Grading of products shall be rendered pursuant to the regulations in this part and under such conditions and in accordance with such methods as may be prescribed or approved by the Administrator.

[71 FR 42008, July 24, 2006]
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of The Furia Organization, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 8, 2004 (the
"Report"), I, Michael Alexander, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael Alexander
--------------------------
Michael Alexander
Chief Financial Officer
December 8, 2004


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
7.403 General Services Administration

assistance and OMB guidance.

(a) When requested by an agency, the General Services Administration (GSA) will assist in rent,

lease, or purchase decisions by providing information such as-

(1) Pending price adjustments to Federal Supply Schedule contracts;

(2) Recent or imminent technological developments;

(3) New techniques; and

(4) Industry or market trends.

(b) For additional GSA assistance and guidance, agencies may—

(1)Request information from the GSA FAS National Customer Service Center by phone at

1-800-488-3111 or by email at ncsccustomer.service@gsa.gov; and

(2)See GSA website, Schedule 51 V Hardware Superstore-Equipment Rental,

(https://www.gsa.gov/buying-selling/products-services/industrial-products-services/rental-of-industri

al-equipment).

(c) For additional OMB guidance, see—

(1)Section 13, Special Guidance for Lease-Purchase Analysis, and paragraph 8.c.(2), Lease-Purchase

Analysis, of OMB Circular A-94, Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal

Programs,

(https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/legacy_drupal_files/omb/circulars/A94/a094.pdf);

and

(2)Appendix B, Budgetary Treatment of Lease-Purchases and Leases of Capital Assets, of OMB

Circular A-11, Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget,

(https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/app_b.pdf).

Parent topic: Subpart 7.4 - Equipment Acquisition
Page 1 of 2 

Case No. 3:20cv5967-LC-HTC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

ALAN LYNSDALE HAMILTON, 

Petitioner, 

v. Case No. 3:20cv5967-LC-HTC 

MARK INCH, 

Respondent. 

______________________/

 ORDER

 The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on June 23, 2021 

(ECF No. 12). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 

 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 

Case 3:20-cv-05967-LC-HTC Document 13 Filed 09/17/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 

Case No. 3:20cv5967-LC-HTC

 2. The motion to dismiss (ECF Doc. 7) is GRANTED. The petition 

under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as 

untimely, without an evidentiary hearing. 

 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

 4. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close 

this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2021. 

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 3:20-cv-05967-LC-HTC Document 13 Filed 09/17/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 51.1161 Discoloration.

*Discoloration* means russeting of a light shade of golden brown caused by rust mite or other means. Lighter shades of discoloration caused by smooth or fairly smooth superficial scars or other means may be allowed on a greater area, or darker shades may be allowed on a lesser area, provided no discoloration caused by speck type melanose or other means may detract from the appearance of the fruit to a greater extent than the shade and amount of discoloration allowed for the grade.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2669 

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 

to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into cooperative agreements with any of the management partners of the Boston Harbor 

Islands National Recreation Area, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2006 

Mr. REID (for Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY)) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to authorize the Secretary of the 

Interior to enter into cooperative agreements with any 

of the management partners of the Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS FOR BOSTON 

4 HARBOR ISLANDS NATIONAL RECREATION 

5 AREA. 

6 Section 1029(d) of the Omnibus Parks and Public 

7 Lands Management Act of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 460kkk(d)) 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

•S 2669 IS

1 is amended by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(3) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.— 

4 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subpara5 graph (C), the Secretary may consult and enter 

6 into 1 or more cooperative agreements with an 

7 eligible entity described in subparagraph (B) to 

8 acquire from and provide to the eligible entity 

9 goods and services for— 

10 ‘‘(i) the cooperative management of 

11 land within the recreation area; 

12 ‘‘(ii) the construction of recreation 

13 area facilities; or 

14 ‘‘(iii) any other purpose that is con15 sistent with the purposes described in sub16 section (a). 

17 ‘‘(B) ELIGIBLE ENTITIES.—For purposes 

18 of this subparagraph, an eligible entity is— 

19 ‘‘(i) the Commonwealth of Massachu20 setts; 

21 ‘‘(ii) a political subdivision of the 

22 Commonwealth of Massachusetts; or 

23 ‘‘(iii) any partnership entity specified 

24 in subsection (e)(2). 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
3 

•S 2669 IS

1 ‘‘(C) CONDITIONS.—A cooperative agree2 ment shall only be entered into under subpara3 graph (A) if the Secretary determines that— 

4 ‘‘(i) appropriations for carrying out 

5 the purposes of the cooperative agreement 

6 are available; and 

7 ‘‘(ii) the cooperative agreement is in 

8 the best interests of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
§ 652.4 Technical service standards. ( a ) All technical services provided by TSPs must meet USDA standards and specifications as set forth in Departmental manuals, handbooks, guides, and other references for soils mapping and natural resources information, conservation planning, conservation practice application, and other areas of technical assistance.
( b ) The Department will only pay a participant for technical services provided in accordance with established NRCS standards, specifications, and requirements. The Department must approve all new technologies and innovative practices, including interim standards and specifications, prior to a TSP initiating technical services for those technologies and practices.
( c ) A TSP must assume responsibility in writing for the particular technical services provided. Technical services provided by the TSP must: ( 1 ) Comply with all applicable Federal, State, tribal, and local laws and requirements;
( 2 ) Meet applicable Department standards, specifications, and program requirements;
( 3 ) Be consistent with the particular conservation program goals and objectives for which the program contract was entered into by the Department and the participant; and
( 4 ) Incorporate alternatives that are both cost effective and appropriate to address the resource issues. Conservation alternatives will meet the objectives for the program and participant to whom assistance is provided.
( d ) TSPs are responsible for the technical services provided, including any costs, damages, claims, liabilities, and judgments arising from past, present, and future negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of the TSP in connection with the technical service provided.
( e ) The Department will not be in breach of any program contract or written agreement if it fails to implement conservation plans or practices or make payment for conservation plans or practices resulting from technical services that do not meet USDA standards and specifications or are not consistent with program requirements.
( f ) The participant is responsible for complying with the terms and conditions of the program contract or written agreement, which includes meeting USDA technical standards and specifications for any technical services provided by a TSP.
( g ) The TSP will report conservation accomplishments associated with the technical services provided to the Department and the participant.
( h ) To the extent allowed under State or tribal law, TSPs may utilize the services of subcontractors to provide specific technical services or expertise needed by the TSP, provided that the subcontractors are certified by NRCS in accordance with this part for the particular technical services to be provided and the technical services are provided in terms of their Certification Agreement. Payments will not be made for any technical services provided by uncertified subcontractors, except when such technical services are provided under the provisions of a procurement contract, cooperative agreement, or contribution agreement with the NRCS.
[75 FR 6845, Feb. 12, 2010, as amended at 79 FR 44640, Aug. 1, 2014]
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bald Eagle Energy Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Andrew S. Harper and
Alvaro Vollmers, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
our knowledge:





(1)      The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and results of
operations of the Company for the periods presented





Date:
      January 13, 2009/s/  Andrew S.
      HarperAndrew
      S. Harper
                          Chief
      Executive Officer, President/s/
      Alvaro VollmersAlvaro
      Vollmers
                          Chief
      Financial Officer, Secretary
                          and
      Treasurer
52.216-24 Limitation of Government Liability.       As prescribed in 16.603-4(b)(2), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when a letter contract is contemplated:          Limitation of Government Liability (Apr 1984)                                       (a) In performing this contract, the Contractor is not authorized to make expenditures or incur obligations exceeding __________ dollars.                                          (b) 						            The maximum amount for which the Government shall be liable if this contract is terminated is ___________ dollars.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.216 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





I, Nidhi
Andalon, Chief Financial Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:





(1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      February 11, 2010
            /s/
NIDHI  ANDALONNidhi
      AndalonPrincipal
      Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

Civil Hearing Minutes

Honorable Hope T. Cannon, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case Style: IN RE: Skanska USA Civil Southeast Inc and Skanska USA Inc 

Case No.: 3:20-cv-5980/LAC-HTC

Date: June 16, 2021

Hearing: Discovery Status Conference

__________________________________________________________________

Time Commenced: 10:00 a.m. Time Concluded: 11:53 a.m. 

Court Reporter: Connie Morse, Phipps Court Reporting

Attorneys and staff present for Petitioners:

Jeremy Branning

Scott Remington 

Christine Moore, ESI Paralegal to Charles Blanchard

Attorneys present for Claimants:

Brian Barr

Sam Geisler

Debra Guntner

Thomas Gonzalez

Stephen Echsner

Jeff Gill

Attorneys Participating telephonically:

Charles Blanchard, Esquire 

Robb Hyde, AUSA, Department of Justice

Tom Bright, AUSA, Department of Justice

PROCEEDINGS:

10:00 a.m. Court in session.

Status conference on matters relating to discovery.

11:53 a.m. Court adjourned.

__________________

Filed in Open Court/DCR

 June 16, 2021 

Deputy Clerk: Keri Igney

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1185 Filed 06/16/21 Page 1 of 1
#### § 635.2 Applicability.

This part applies to all covered programs administered by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, except for the Highly Erodible Land and Wetland Conservation provisions of Title XII, subtitles B and C of the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 3811 *et seq.*). Administration of this part shall be under the supervision of the Chief, except that such authority shall not limit the exercise of authority by State Conservationists of the Natural Resources Conservation Service provided in § 635.6 of this part.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2734 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2734

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Blue 80.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2006

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Blue 80.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT BLUE 80.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.81      Pigment Blue 80     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (provided for in                                                   31/2009
                         subheading
                         3204.17.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6828

MARC S. CASON, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

M.D.P.S.C.S.; C.M.S.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.

(1:08-cv-01108-CCB)

Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 28, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marc S. Cason, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Marc S. Cason, Sr., appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cason

v. M.D.P.S.C.S., No. 1:08-cv-01108-CCB (D. Md. May 15, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 52.3757 Standard sample unit size. Compliance with requirements for the various quality factors except “size designation” is based on the following standard sample unit size for the applicable style: ( a ) *Whole and pitted* —50 olives.
( b ) *Halved* —100 units.
( c ) *All other styles* —255 g (9 ounces).