alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contain summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Partners XIV 1997 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000759859
<NAME> ANGELES PARTNERS XIV
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       64
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          40,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         43,948
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (30,328)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,701
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,397
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (795)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (17.93)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 VS CASE NO. 1:98-CR-19-15 MMP 

 WILLIAM L. ATTEBERRY

FINANCIAL REFERRAL AND ORDER

Regarding release of funds for: Fine, Restitution, Filing Fee, Attorney Admission Fee,

 Copy Fee, Bond, X Other (Specify) Costs of Supervision 

By: William L. Atteberry (Payee)

Address: 2994 Covewood Place

Clearwater, FL 33761

Receipt Number 400-109546 Date of Receipt 1/11/06 

Motion: N/A

Explanation: William Atteberry was ordered to pay a $100.00 SMA, a $25,000 fine and $9,118.44 for

cost of supervision. Mr. Atteberry has paid the SMA and fine in full, as well as, $912.58 in interest. 

Mr. Atteberry paid $9,418.44 toward cost of supervision resulting in an overpayment of $300.00. 

Requesting authorization to refund the $300.00 overpayment.

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, Clerk of Court

Prepared by: ___s/Philip Detweiler___________

 Philip Detweiler, Financial Specialist Date: January 27, 2006

Referred by: ,Deputy Clerk

ORDER OF COURT

It is ORDERED this 21st day of February , 2006, that the Clerk

refund the identified funds to the payee.

 s/Maurice M. Paul

 

 MAURICE M. PAUL 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Adopted: 12/03/99

Case 1:98-cr-00019-MP Document 1468 Filed 02/21/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 73166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30049]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Art Advisory Panel--Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Closed Meeting of Art Advisory Panel for Decorative 
Art.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held in 
Washington, DC.

DATES: The meeting will be held December 8, 2010.

ADDRESSES: The closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel for Decorative 
Art will be held on December 8, 2010, in the Appeals Media Center 
beginning at 9:30 a.m., Franklin Court Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph E. Bothwell, C:AP:PV:ART, 1099 
14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. Telephone (202) 435-5611 (not a 
toll free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that a 
closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel for Decorative Art will be 
held on December 8, 2010, beginning at 9:30 a.m., in room 4112, Appeals 
Large Conference Room, Franklin Court Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20005.
    The agenda will consist of the review and evaluation of the 
acceptability of fair market value appraisals of works of art involved 
in Federal income, estate, or gift tax returns. This will involve the 
discussion of material in individual tax returns made confidential by 
the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 6103.
    A determination as required by section 10(d) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act has been made that this meeting is concerned 
with matters listed in section 552b(c)(3), (4), (6), and (7), and that 
the meeting will not be open to the public.

Diane S. Ryan,
Chief, Appeals.
[FR Doc. 2010-30049 Filed 11-24-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of

Contract Claim.

As prescribed in 33.215(b), insert the following clause:

Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim (Oct 2004)

United States law will apply to resolve any claim of breach of this contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.233 [Reserved]
#### § 51.40 Traveling and other expenses.

Costs including travel incurred by the Agricultural Marketing Service in providing inspection service or appeal inspections may be charged to the applicant, including any Government agency. These charges shall be included with the fee for inspection on the bill furnished the applicant.

[56 FR 55800, Oct. 30, 1991]
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 25, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1956 Lower Tribunal No. F21-19119

________________ 

### Bideau Jean, Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alberto Milian, Judge. Bideau Jean, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236, 1241 (Fla. 2004)2

(reaffirming well-established principles that “habeas corpus may not be used as a substitute for an appropriate motion seeking postconviction relief. . . . Nor can habeas corpus be used as a means to seek a second appeal or to litigate issues that could have been or were raised in a motion under rule 3.850”) (citation omitted) (quoting Harris v. State, 789 So. 2d 1114, 1115 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)); Beiro v. State, 289 So. 3d 511, 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (noting: “The mere incantation of the words ‘manifest injustice’ does not make it so.”).
#### § 701.117 Average adjusted gross income limitation.

To be eligible for payments issued from the $16 million provided under the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (Pub. L. 110-28, section 9003), each applicant must meet the provisions of the Adjusted Gross Income Limitations at 7 CFR part 1400 subpart G.

[72 FR 45880, Aug. 16, 2007. Redesignated at 75 FR 70088, Nov. 17, 2010]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned
hereby certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of First Capital Bancorp, Inc.



|      |  |                |  |     |  |                                                                                             
|----- |  | -------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | March 31, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ John M. Presley                                                                         
|      |  |                |  |     |  | John M. Presley Managing
Director and Chief Executive Officer                               
|      |  |                | 
|      |  |                |  | By: |  | /s/ William W. Ranson                                                                       
|      |  |                |  |     |  | William W. Ranson Senior
Vice President and CFO (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
52.203-15 Whistleblower Protections	Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.       As prescribed	in 3.907-7, use the	following clause:          Whistleblower Protections Under The	American Recovery And Reinvestment Act of 2009 (June 2010)                                       (a) 						            The	Contractor shall post notice of employees rights and remedies for	whistleblower protections provided under section 1553 of the American	Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5) (Recovery	Act).                                          (b) 						            The Contractor	shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph	(b), in all subcontracts that are funded in whole or in part with	Recovery Act funds.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.203 [Reserved]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 97-60165

No. 97-60295

____________

THE PEABODY CORPORATION, doing business as

Reilly-Benton Co. Inc.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MERCHANTS AND MARINE BANK,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

(1:96-CV-255-RR & 1:96-CV-255-FF)

January 14, 1998

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

On the unopposed motion of Merchants and Marine Bank (“M&M”),

we have consolidated appeal numbers 97-60165 and 97-60295. In 97-

60165, the Peabody Corporation (“Peabody”) appeals the district

court’s grant of summary judgment to M&M on Peabody’s claims of

fraud and negligent misrepresentation arising out of a brief

telephone conversation between a representative of Peabody’s bank
and the Chief Executive Officer of M&M. We affirm this judgment

for substantially the reasons set out by the district court in its

Memorandum Order of November 25, 1996, finding particularly

persuasive the district court’s discussion of M&M’s lack of duty to

Peabody. See, e.g., Foster v. Bass, 575 So. 2d 967, 972 (Miss.

1990) (“duty and breach of that duty are essential to a finding of

negligence”).

In appeal number 97-60295, M&M appeals the district court’s

denial of attorney’s fees. We find no abuse of discretion in the

district court’s order and therefore affirm. See Wegner v.

Standard Ins. Co., 129 F.3d 814, 820-821 (5th Cir. 1997) (“We

review the district court’s decision to award attorneys’ fees only

for an abuse of discretion.”).
1.102-3 Evaluating agency acquisition

processes.

(a)Agencies are encouraged to develop internal procedures seeking voluntary feedback from

interested parties in an acquisition to assess process strengths and weaknesses and improve

effectiveness and efficiency of the acquisition process. Agencies may—

(1)Utilize a variety of feedback mechanisms available to the public ( e.g., surveys, in-person, and/or

group exchanges);

(2)Utilize the core preaward and debriefing survey questions at https://www.acquisition.gov/360;

and

(3)Seek additional feedback on targeted aspects of an acquisition throughout its lifecycle ( e.g.,

performance standards at 1.102-2 or postaward contract administration responsibilities at 42.302).

(b)Contracting officers are encouraged to insert the provision 52.201-1, Acquisition 360: Voluntary

Survey, in accordance with agency procedures.

(c)Contracting officers shall not review information until after contract award and shall not consider

it in the award decision.

Parent topic: 1.102 Statement of guiding principles for the Federal Acquisition System.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FIL ED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

McKENZIE LEROY LUNSFORD, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D13-2670 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed July 9, 2014.

Appeal from the Circu it Court for Pinellas County; Chris Helinger, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and
Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

BLACK, Judge.

We affirm McKenzie Lunsford's convictions and sentences witho ut

comment. However, we remand fo r entry of a corrected judgment reflecting that- 2 - Lunsford pleaded only to counts 1 , 2, and 3, and was convicted after a jury trial of

counts 4 and 5. See Willingham v. State, 48 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 2 d DCA 2010).

KHOUZAM, J., and BAUMANN, HERBER T J., JR., ASSOCIATE JUDGE, Con cur.
52.230-7 Proposal Disclosure-Cost

Accounting Practice Changes.

As prescribed in 30.201-3(c), insert the following provision:

Proposal Disclosure-Cost Accounting Practice Changes (Apr 2005)

The offeror shall check "yes" below if the contract award will result in a required or unilateral

change in cost accounting practice, including unilateral changes requested to be desirable changes.

□ Yes □ No

If the offeror checked "Yes" above, the offeror shall-

(1) Prepare the price proposal in response to the solicitation using the changed practice for the

period of performance for which the practice will be used; and

(2) Submit a description of the changed cost accounting practice to the Contracting Officer and the

Cognizant Federal Agency Official as pricing support for the proposal.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.230 [Reserved]
### Preliminary assessment of phosphorus transport in the Cheney Reservoir watershed, south-central Kansas, 1997-98

By: L. M. PopeC.R. Milligan

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wri004023

#### Links

- More information:  **Publisher Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Documents:                                -  **Report**                                                                                                     (html)                                                                                                                                     
  - **Report**                                                                                                     (7198 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
2006-0039.

#### Burns v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.

Trumbull App. Nos. 2004-T-0071 and 2004-T-0072, 2005-Ohio-6290. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1407, 2006-Ohio-1703, 845 N.E.2d 523. On motion for reconsideration. Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent:

The discretionary appeal is accepted; the cause is held for the decision in 2006-0405, *Geretz v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.,*Erie App. No. E-05-042, 2006-Ohio-321; and briefing schedule is stayed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.480 Prior approval of changes to RBIC's business plan.

Without the Agency's prior written approval, no change in your business plan, upon which you were selected and licensed as a RBIC, may take effect.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Kevin
P. O'Connell, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
10KSB of IMMS , Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2007 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10KSB
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of IMMS, Inc. of Nevada.
  Date: March
      17, 2008
                By:
                /s/ Kevin
      P. O'ConnellKevin
      P. O'ConnellCEO,
      and Chairman of the Board of Directors
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academic DeansAdministrator RoleCollege AdministrationDeans of StudentsEducational ChangeHigher EducationInstructional Leadership

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
32.903 Responsibilities.

(a) Agency heads-

(1) Must establish the policies and procedures necessary to implement this subpart;

(2) May prescribe additional standards for establishing invoice payment due dates (see 32.904)

necessary to support agency programs and foster prompt payment to contractors;

(3) May adopt different payment procedures in order to accommodate unique circumstances,

provided that such procedures are consistent with the policies in this subpart;

(4) Must inform contractors of points of contact within their cognizant payment offices to enable

contractors to obtain status of invoices; and

(5) May authorize the use of the accelerated payment methods specified at 5 CFR 1315.5, but see

32.009-1(a).

(b) When drafting solicitations and contracts, contracting officers must identify for each line item

number, subline item number, or exhibit line item number-

(1) The applicable Prompt Payment clauses that apply to each item when the solicitation or contract

contains items that will be subject to different payment terms; and

(2) The applicable Prompt Payment food category (e.g., which item numbers are meat or meat food

products, which are perishable agricultural commodities), when the solicitation or contract contains

multiple payment terms for various classes of foods and edible products.

Parent topic: Subpart 32.9 - Prompt Payment
#### § 58.647 Composition requirements for ice cream.

See § 58.605(a).
Exhibit 15.1

TIAN YUAN LAW FIRM

11F/Tower C, Corporate Square,

35 Financial St. Beijing. 100032,

P. R. China

Tel: (8610) 8809-2188;

Fax: (8610)8809-2150.

Date:
October 19, 2009

New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.

No.6 Hai Dian Zhong Street

9th Floor

Haidian District, Beijing 100080

Peoples
Republic of China

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the use of our name under the captions REGULATION and RISK FACTORS included in the Form 20-F, which will be filed by New Oriental Education &
Technology Group Inc. on October 19, 2009, with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13 or 15(D) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009.



|                         
|-------------------------
|Sincerely yours,         
|                         
|/s/    Tian Yuan Law Firm
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 for May Limited Partnership  1984-1 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000757525
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1984-1
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                         297
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  246
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               543
<PP&E>                                         8,864
<DEPRECIATION>                                 8,064
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     536
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   543
<SALES>                                        271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               274
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  37
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                237
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            237
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   237
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  27.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  27.18
        


</TABLE>