CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### A P CD/ A QMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 1

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: 

### South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule No: 

### 1132

Date Adopted/Amended/Rescinded: 

### Amended 05/05/06

Rule Title: 

### Further Control of VOC Emissions from High-Emitting Spray Booth Facilities

Date Submitted to ARB: 

### March 5 , 2009

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): 

### May 7, 2004

Is the rule intended to be sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? ( x ) Yes ( ) No. If NO, do not

complete remainder of form.

District Contact: 

### Helmy Sultan Phone Number: 

### (909) 396-2362

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: ( ) New Rule ( x ) Amended Rule



### Rule 1132- Further Control of VOC Emissions from High-Emitting Spray Booth Facilities

was amended to modify the definition of Appr oved Emission Factors to exclude the use

of the Unified Emission Factors (UEF) rate s for gel coat nonatomizing application

emissions calculations.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Circle): ROG NOx SO2 CO TAC (name): ROG (Such as

Styrene and Methylmethacrylate)

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when im plemented, will result in quantifiable changes in

emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s ) and other information. Attach calculation sheet

showing how the emission informati on provided below was determined.

Net Effect on Emissions: ( ) Increase ( ) Decrease (X) N/A



### The amendments to Rule 1132 result in no impact on air quality or emissions.

SCC/CES Code Affected: If a SCC Code is Assigned, SIC Code Affected: 

### 3081-89 & 3731-32

(NOTE: If more than one SCC or CES code or mo re than one combination of SCC and SIC codes are

needed, fill out the following information on a separate form for each combination of codes.)

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: 

### 1998-99

Area Affected: 

### South Coast Air Quality Management District

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible): 

### N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: ( ) Attainment ( 

### x ) Nonattainment ( ) Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: 

### 66

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled : 

### 6 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 

### 100%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach

additional sheets as necessary):

Facility Name Facility ID Location City County Name



### 1. Lasco Bathware, Inc. 24060 Anaheim Orange

2. Xerxes Corporation 70021 Anaheim Orange

3. Consolidation Drum 118800 Montebello Los Angeles

4. The Hon Company 006262 South Gate Los Angeles

5. Kushwood Mfg 112597 Ontario San Bernardino

6. Resinart Corporation 020302 Costa Mesa Orange

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY



### Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? (x) Yes ( ) No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) (c) of the Rule.

Section (c) requires 65 percent reduction in VOC emissions using low-VOC materials,

add-on control or a combination of both techniques.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are the following:

Section (d)(1)(A) of the Alternative Co mpliance Plan requires nonatomizing spray

application technologies for spraying resins.

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): 

### (c), (d)(1), (d)(2) and (d)(3).

Work Practice Standards in Section(s): 

### (d)(1)(A).

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): (g)

Attach a Completed EPA SIP Approvability Checklist - Enforceability or Provide an Equivalent

Compliance/Enforcement Strategy Statement.

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

( 

### X ) No Impact ( ) Impacts RFP ( ) Impacts attainment

Discussion: N/A