alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 51.1235 U.S. Jumbo Hand Picked. U.S. Jumbo Hand Picked shall consist of cleaned Virginia type peanuts in the shell which are mature, dry, and free from loose peanut kernels, dirt or other foreign material, pops, paper ends, and from damage caused by cracked or broken shells, discoloration or other means. The kernels shall be free from damage from any cause. In addition, the peanuts shall not pass through a screen having 37 ⁄ 64 × 3 inch perforations. Unless otherwise specified, the unshelled peanuts in any lot shall not average more than 176 count per pound. ( a ) In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, the following tolerances, by weight, shall be permitted: ( 1 ) 10.0 percent total for pops, peanuts having paper ends or damaged shells, loose undamaged peanut kernels, and dirt or other foreign material, but not more than one-twentieth of this amount, or 0.5 percent, shall be allowed for dirt or other foreign material.
( 2 ) 5.0 percent for peanuts which will pass through the prescribed screen, but which are free from pops and from peanuts having paper ends or damaged shells.
( 3 ) 3.5 percent for peanuts with damaged kernels, and damaged loose kernels.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 50594 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Casey Allen Murray,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:20

- CR

- 13

- 1

Before **Jones, Clement,** and **Haynes,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Casey Allen Murray has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Murray has not filed a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 7, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50594 Document: 00515854055 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2021No. 20

- 50594

2 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is **G RANTED**  , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R. 42.2**

. Case: 20-50594 Document: 00515854055 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/07/2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                          34,629
<SECURITIES>                                    22,971
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,831
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,666
<INVENTORY>                                        890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,100
<PP&E>                                          88,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 421,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,373
<BONDS>                                          3,493
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           201
<OTHER-SE>                                     299,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   421,321
<SALES>                                         30,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,065
<CGS>                                            5,927
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   457
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,579)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,104
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,683)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,683)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.14)


</TABLE>
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 

### 07825 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### x 07825\07825_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 07825\07825_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 07825\07825_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 07825\07825_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07825\07825_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07825\07825_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07825\07825_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07825\07825_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 07825\Certification Statement Plant ID_07825.pdf Plant certification statement 

### x 07825\Supporting Documentation\07825_Part A.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07825\Supporting Documentation\07825_Part B.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07825\Supporting Documentation\07825_Part C.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07825\Supporting Documentation\07825_Part D.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07825\Supporting Documentation\07825_Part H.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07825\Supporting Documentation\07825_Part I.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We have issued our reports dated March 18, 2013, with respect to the financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, included in the Annual Report of KCAP Financial, Inc. (formerly, Kohlberg Capital Corporation) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of KCAP Financial, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-175838, effective July 28, 2011; and File No. 333-151995, effective June 27, 2008). /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP   New York, New York March 18, 2013
#### § 51.1447 Uniform in color.

*Uniform in color* means that 95 percent or more of the kernels in the lot have skin color within the range of one or two color classifications.
19.506 Documentation requirements.

(a)

(1) The contracting officer shall document the rationale when a contract is not totally set aside for

small business in accordance with 19.502-2.

(2) The contracting officer shall document the rationale when a multiple-award contract is not

partially set aside, not reserved, and does not allow for setting aside of orders, when these

authorities could have been used.

(b) If applicable, the documentation shall include the rationale for not accepting the

recommendations made by the agency Director of the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business

Utilization, or, for the Department of Defense, the Director of the Office of Small Business Programs,

or the Director's designee, as to whether a particular acquisition should be awarded under subparts

19.5, 19.8, 19.13, 19.14, or 19.15.

(c) Documentation is not required if a contract award is anticipated to a small business under

subpart 19.5, 19.8, 19.13, 19.14, or 19.15.

Parent topic: Subpart 19.5 - Small Business Total Set-Asides, Partial Set-Asides, and Reserves
#### § 51.651 Diameter.

*Diameter* means the greatest dimension measured at right angles to a line from stem to blossom end.
#### Clement Klobukowski, Respondent, v. Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks, Amsterdam Lodge No. 101, et al., Appellants.

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Montgomery County, entered February 9, 1968 after a jury trial, and from an order of the said court entered February 7, 1968 denying their motion to set aside the jury verdict in favor of plaintiff. This action was pleaded and tried on the theory of common-law negligence. The respondent while in the status of a business invitee upon the appellants’ premises was injured when some flooring upon which he was standing gave way. Insofar as the appellants contend that the court erred in failing to charge as to notice of a defect on the part of the appellants, we note that they made no such request to charge, nor took any exception upon that ground. The court in its charge made reference to a duty of the appellants to provide the respondent (a delivery man) with a “safe place to work” and the right of the respondent to assume that the premises were safe. The first place this occurred was when the court prior to charging on the law summarized the *contentions*of the respondent. The next place it occurred was near the end of the charge when the court said: “He [respondent] had a right to assume, under the law, that he would be afforded a safe place to work. A place that would not injure him. He had a right to assume that. The law imposes that upon them.” The counsel for the appellants objected to that portion of the charge wherein “you stated that a duty was owed to the plaintiff by the defendant, to provide him with a safe place to work ”. A reading of the charge in its entirety and the portion thereof referred to by the appellants does not show any charge by the court that would have permitted the jury to find an absolute responsibility on the part of the appellants to provide a floor which would not collapse. The Labor Law was not applicable to this action and the court in its charge did not refer to it. The charge when taken in context applied the theory of common-law negligence and there is no prejudice as to the rights of the defendants. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RAYMOND A. PROFIT,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-246-AW-GRJ

MICHELLE HART, et al., 

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF 

No. 8, to which no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is 

adopted and incorporated into this order. The motion for class certification, ECF No. 

5, is DENIED. The magistrate judge will conduct further appropriate proceedings. 

SO ORDERED on December 7, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00246-AW-GRJ Document 13 Filed 12/07/20 Page 1 of 1
# 36.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes policies and procedures peculiar to *contracting* for *construction* and *architect-engineer services*. It includes requirements for using certain clauses and standard forms that apply also to contracts for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements.

**Parent topic:**Part 36 - Construction and Architect-Engineer Contracts
#### § 51.2737 Broken.

*Broken* means that more than one-fourth of the peanut kernel is broken off.
#### § 51.3198 Size classifications.

Size shall be specified in connection with the grade in terms of minimum diameter, range in diameter, minimum diameter with a percentage of a certain size or larger, or in accordance with one of the size classifications listed below: *Provided,* that unless otherwise specified, onions shall not be less than 11⁄2 inches in diameter, with 60 percent or more 2 inches or larger in diameter.

| Size designation | Minimum diameter | | Maximum diameter | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Inches | Millimeters | Inches | Millimeters |
| Small | 1 | 25.4 | 21/4 | 57.2 |
| Repacker/Prepacker1 | 13/4 | 44.5 | 3 | 76.2 |
| Medium | 2 | 50.8 | 31/4 | 82.6 |
| Large or Jumbo | 3 | 76.2 | (2) | |
| Colossal | 33/4 | 95.3 | (2) | |
| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 In addition to the sizes specified, a lot of onions designated as Repacker or Prepacker shall contain at least 60 percent or more 2 inches or larger in diameter. | | | | |
| 2 No requirement. | | | | |
#### § 51.2087 Decay.

*Decay* means that part or all of the kernel has become decomposed.
**MARCH 8, 2002**

Bioterrorism   and Health Care Disparities (Briefing Paper)

Briefing   Transcript 

Acknowledgments
Exhibit
32.2





Statement of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as the Principal financial
officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Jeffrey B.
      ReedyJeffrey
      B. ReedyChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      13, 2010





28
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JENNY HANSSON, 

d/b/a CHERRY PEPPERS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:03cv182-MCR/WCS

CHARLES E. COOKE, 

and G. EDWARD COOKE,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

On May 25, 2005, the sixth report and recommendation, doc. 86, was adopted

and all of the state law tort claims were dismissed. Doc.89. Pro se Plaintiff Charlie

Burke was also dismissed as a party in this case. Id. Plaintiff Hansson was directed to

file an amended complaint no later than July 1, 2005. Id. 

Defendants previously filed a motion for a pre-trial conference, doc. 84, and an

amended motion, doc. 85, requesting direction from the Court. To the degree

Defendants seek a pre-trial conference, the motion is denied. Until Plaintiff Hansson

demonstrates her intent to proceed as the sole Plaintiff in this case by filing the

amended complaint as directed, a pre-trial conference is inappropriate. However, upon

Case 5:03-cv-00182-RS-WCS Document 91 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:03cv182-MCR/WCS

Plaintiff's filing of that pleading, an order will be expeditiously entered to guide these proceedings.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. Defendants' motion for a pre-trial conference, doc. 84, and the amended

motion for a pre-trial conference, doc. 85, are DENIED as premature.

2. Plaintiff Hansson shall file the amended complaint presenting only her

contract claims no later than July 1, 2005, as directed by District Judge M. Casey

Rodgers, doc. 89.

3. The Clerk of Court shall return this file to the undersigned upon receipt of

Plaintiff Hansson's amended complaint or no later than July 1, 2005.

DONE AND ORDERED on June 2, 2005.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:03-cv-00182-RS-WCS Document 91 Filed 06/02/05 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5468-N-01]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Deputy Secretary, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice of Appointments.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Housing and Urban Development announces the appointments of Joseph F. Smith, Patricia A. Hoban-Moore, and Mary K. Kinney, as members; and Frank J. Murphy, and Clifford D. Taffett as alternate members of the Departmental Performance Review Board. The address is: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC 20410-0050.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Persons desiring any further  information about the Performance Review Board and its members may contact  Gwendolyn Fleming, Deputy Director, Office of Executive Resources, Department of  Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC 20410. Telephone (202) 708-1381. (This is not a toll-free number)

Dated: November 29, 2010.

Ron Sims,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-30331 Filed 12-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
§ 51.750 U.S. Fancy. “U.S. Fancy” consists of grapefruit which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Discoloration: Not more than one-tenth of the surface, in the aggregate, may be affected by discoloration. (See § 51.770.);
( 2 ) Firm;
( 3 ) Mature;
( 4 ) Similar varietal characteristics;
( 5 ) Smooth texture;
( 6 ) Well colored; and,
( 7 ) Well formed.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Ammoniation;
( 2 ) Buckskin;
( 3 ) Caked melanose;
( 4 ) Decay;
( 5 ) Scab;
( 6 ) Sprayburn;
( 7 ) Unhealed skin breaks; and,
( 8 ) Wormy fruit.
( c ) Free from injury caused by: ( 1 ) Bruises;
( 2 ) Green spots;
( 3 ) Oil spots;
( 4 ) Scale;
( 5 ) Scars;
( 6 ) Skin breakdown; and,
( 7 ) Thorn scratches.
( d ) Free from damage caused by: ( 1 ) Dirt or other foreign material;
( 2 ) Disease;
( 3 ) Dryness or mushy condition;
( 4 ) Hail;
( 5 ) Insects;
( 6 ) Sprouting;
( 7 ) Sunburn; and,
( 8 ) Other means.
( e ) For tolerances see § 51.760.
# L_2014036DE.01002202.xml

| 6.2.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 36/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 36/22

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1202/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 20. November 2013 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1215/2009 des Rates hinsichtlich der Zollkontingente für Wein

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 321 vom 30. November 2013
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 321 vom 30. November 2013

Auf Seite 5, Anhang, neuer Anhang I, Wortlaut der Fußnote 2:

anstatt:

| „(2) | Wein mit Ursprung in Albanien erhält Zugang zu diesem Gesamtzollkontingent, sofern zuvor das einzelne Zollkontingent ausgeschöpft wurde, das in dem mit Albanien vereinbarten Zusatzprotokoll über Wein festgelegt ist. Dieses einzelne Zollkontingent wird unter den laufenden Nummern 09.1514 und 09.1513 eröffnet.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(2)

Wein mit Ursprung in Albanien erhält Zugang zu diesem Gesamtzollkontingent, sofern zuvor das einzelne Zollkontingent ausgeschöpft wurde, das in dem mit Albanien vereinbarten Zusatzprotokoll über Wein festgelegt ist. Dieses einzelne Zollkontingent wird unter den laufenden Nummern 09.1514 und 09.1513 eröffnet.“

muss es heißen:

| „(2) | Wein mit Ursprung in Albanien erhält Zugang zu diesem Gesamtzollkontingent, sofern zuvor das einzelne Zollkontingent ausgeschöpft wurde, das in dem mit Albanien vereinbarten Zusatzprotokoll über Wein festgelegt ist. Dieses einzelne Zollkontingent wird unter den laufenden Nummern 09.1512 und 09.1513 eröffnet.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(2)

Wein mit Ursprung in Albanien erhält Zugang zu diesem Gesamtzollkontingent, sofern zuvor das einzelne Zollkontingent ausgeschöpft wurde, das in dem mit Albanien vereinbarten Zusatzprotokoll über Wein festgelegt ist. Dieses einzelne Zollkontingent wird unter den laufenden Nummern 09.1512 und 09.1513 eröffnet.“

---
January 8, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CARENU, LLC, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00964-CV V.

IT DEVICES ONLINE, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

order signed by the court below on November 10, 2014. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Carenu, LLC.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
22.1303 Applicability.       (a) 						            The Act applies to all contracts and subcontracts for personal property and nonpersonal services (including construction) of $150,000 or more except as waived by the Secretary of Labor.                                          (b) 						            The requirements of the clause at 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans, in any contract with a State or local government (or any agency, instrumentality, or subdivision) do not apply to any agency, instrumentality, or subdivision of that government that does not participate in work on or under the contract.                                          (c) 						            The Act requires submission of the VETS-4212 Report in all cases where the contractor or subcontractor has received an award of $150,000 or more, except for awards to State and local governments, and foreign organizations where the workers are recruited outside of the United States.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 22.13 - Equal Opportunity for Veterans
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 3:20cr93/MCR

LEONARD J. SEIDMAN

 /

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there has been no timely objections, and subject to this Court’s

consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(3), the plea of

guilty of the Defendant, LEONARD J. SEIDMAN, to Count One of the Indictment

is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as

directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of February 2021.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00093-MCR Document 26 Filed 02/11/21 Page 1 of 1