alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INCOME
STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                           3,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,918
<INVENTORY>                                     56,539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,563
<PP&E>                                         297,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 327,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,963
<BONDS>                                        127,923
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,394
<OTHER-SE>                                     116,882
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   327,909
<SALES>                                        111,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,585
<CGS>                                           81,332
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,922
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,708
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,034
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,411)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,971)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,440)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,440)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MIGUEL MORALES ESTUDILLO,

A# 208-024-284,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 4:20cv546-TKW-MAF

WILLIAM P. BARR, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Petitioner, proceeding pro se, initiated this case by submitting a

petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking

release from detention pursuant to Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678

(2001). ECF No. 1. Respondents’ filed a motion to dismiss the petition as

moot, ECF No. 6, advising that Petitioner had been removed from the

United States to his native country of Mexico. Respondents further

advised that “confirmation documents” would be filed when received. Id. 

In light of the fact that Petitioner’s copy of the Court Order directing

service of the petition was returned to the Court as undeliverable, ECF No.

Case 4:20-cv-00546-TKW-MAF Document 11 Filed 01/05/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

7, Magistrate Judge Fitzpatrick entered a recommendation to dismiss the

case as moot since it appeared Petitioner was no longer in custody. ECF

No. 8. Furthermore, Respondents have now filed a supplemental exhibit

demonstrating that Petitioner was removed from the United States on

December 9, 2020. ECF No. 9. Because Petitioner is no longer in custody

and has received the relief requested, this § 2241 petition is dismissed as

moot. 

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 8, is ADOPTED.

2. Respondents’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 6, as supported by the

supplemental Exhibit, ECF No. 9, is GRANTED. 

3. This case is DISMISSED as moot since Petitioner is no longer in

custody. 

4. The Clerk of Court shall close the file.

DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2021.

 T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 4:20cv546-TKW-MAF

Case 4:20-cv-00546-TKW-MAF Document 11 Filed 01/05/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DUE PROCESS, LTD., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:03cv580/MCR/MD

ALTERNATIVE DEBT SERVICES, 

INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's reportand

recommendation dated August 25, 2005. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of

the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The clerk shall enter default against defendants JEN DEVINE and TOM

ROBERTS and refer the file back to the magistrate judge for a determination on the

record of the appropriate amount of the judgment.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of October, 2005.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 90 Filed 10/14/05 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 3:04cr5/MCR

 3:07cv264/MCR/MD

LARRY DION HAMMOND

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon defendant’s motion for relief from documents

188, 189 and 190 (doc. 191) and motion for extension of time to file. (Doc. 192).

Defendant filed a § 2255 motion that was docketed on June 21, 2007. (Doc. 187). The

court entered an order directing him to file an amended motion, not because of substantive

errors or omissions, but because he had failed to properly fill out the § 2255 form in

accordance with the Local Rules. (Doc. 188). Thus, when defendant moved to voluntarily

dismiss his motion so he could refile it (doc. 189), the court denied the motion, noting that

he had only been directed to correct technical deficiencies and had been afforded time in

which to do this. (Doc. 190). Defendant now moves for relief from this order, indicating

his belief that his initial motion was a “bare bone” motion filed by an inadequate “jailhouse

lawyer” who has since been transferred to another institution, and again expressing a

desire that his motion be dismissed so that he can refile an “adequately presentable”

motion.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

 That defendant’s renewed motion to dismiss his § 2255 motion (doc. 191) be

granted and that his motion for extension of time (doc. 192) be denied as moot. 

At Pensacola, Florida, this 31st day of July, 2007.

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:04-cr-00005-MCR-MD Document 193 Filed 07/31/07 Page 1 of 2
Case No: 3:04cr5/MCR; 3:07cv264/MCR/MD

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be

filed within ten days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that

may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case 3:04-cr-00005-MCR-MD Document 193 Filed 07/31/07 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:21-mj-00003-EMT Document 6 Filed 01/20/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:21-mj-00003-EMT Document 6 Filed 01/20/21 Page 2 of 2
No. 89-6077.

#### Quesinberry *v.*North Carolina.

Sup. Ct. N. C. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma paupe*
      *1023
      *ris*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *McKoy*v. *North Carolina, ante,*p. 433.
Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 72 Filed 03/25/22 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 72 Filed 03/25/22 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 72 Filed 03/25/22 Page 3 of 3
52.242-1 Notice of Intent to Disallow Costs.       As prescribed in 42.802, insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when a cost-reimbursement contract, a fixed-price incentive contract, or a contract providing for price redetermination is contemplated:          Notice of Intent to Disallow Costs (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            Notwithstanding any other clause of this contract-                                                         (1) 								                The Contracting Officer may at any time issue to the Contractor a written notice of intent to disallow specified costs incurred or planned for incurrence under this contract that have been determined not to be allowable under the contract terms; and                                                            (2) 								                The Contractor may, after receiving a notice under paragraph (a)(1) of this clause, submit a written response to the Contracting Officer, with justification for allowance of the costs. If the Contractor does respond within 60 days, the Contracting Officer shall, within 60 days of receiving the response, either make a written withdrawal of the notice or issue a written decision.                                                                             (b) 						            Failure to issue a notice under this Notice of Intent to Disallow Costs clause shall not affect the Government’s rights to take exception to incurred costs.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.242 [Reserved]
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 51142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20187]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 18 September 2014, at 9:00 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street 
NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing staff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: August 19, 2014, in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-20187 Filed 8-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                       COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X

          This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Balance Sheets of
King World Productions, Inc. and its Subsidiaries and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         000756764
<NAME>                        #x4hauwm
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
<CURRENCY>                              U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Aug-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          Dec-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            Feb-28-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                                  $338,340
<SECURITIES>                            $0
<RECEIVABLES>                           $110,274
<ALLOWANCES>                            $3,014
<INVENTORY>                             $0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        $563,410
<PP&E>                                  $34,885
<DEPRECIATION>                          $15,075
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          $1,036,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   $114,979
<BONDS>                                 $0
<COMMON>                                $890
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   $0
<PREFERRED>                             $0
<OTHER-SE>                              $920,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            $1,036,141
<SALES>                                 $0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        $197,483
<CGS>                                   $0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           $120,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        $23,856
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      $0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         $60,752
<INCOME-TAX>                            $21,449
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     $39,303
<DISCONTINUED>                          $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         $0
<CHANGES>                               $0
<NET-INCOME>                            $39,303
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.53
        


</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2530 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Methyl-5-n-propoxy-2,4-dihydro-1,2,4- 

triazol-3-one. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Methyl-5-n-propoxy2,4-dihydro-1,2,4-triazol-3-one. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-METHYL-5-N-PROPOXY-2,4-DIHYDRO-1,2,4- 

4 TRIAZOL-3-ONE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.38.25 4-Methyl-5-n-propoxy-2,4- 

dihydro-1,2,4-triazol-3-one 

(CAS No. 145027–96–9) 

(provided for in subheading 

3824.90.28) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


HMoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 2530 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


HMoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 9, 2015

No. 04-14-00556-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.L.W., S.S.W., AND L.M.W., Children,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-15199

Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 Appellee has filed an unopposed motion to abate this appeal so the parties may mediate 

their dispute. We grant the motion and order the deadlines in this appeal are suspended until 

March 16, 2015. A motion to dispose of this appeal or appellee’s brief must be filed by March 

16, 2015.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of February, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# 47.303 Standard delivery terms and contract clauses.

Standard delivery terms are listed in 47.303-1 through 47.303-16 (but see 47.300 regarding applicability to cost reimbursement contracts).

- 47.303-1 F.o.b. origin. 
- 47.303-2 F.o.b. origin, contractor’s facility. 
- 47.303-3 F.o.b. origin, freight allowed. 
- 47.303-4 F.o.b. origin, freight prepaid. 
- 47.303-5 F.o.b. origin, with differentials. 
- 47.303-6 F.o.b. destination. 
- 47.303-7 F.o.b. destination, within consignee’s premises. 
- 47.303-8 F.a.s. vessel, port of shipment. 
- 47.303-9 F.o.b. vessel, port of shipment. 
- 47.303-10 F.o.b. inland carrier, point of exportation. 
- 47.303-11 F.o.b. inland point, country of importation. 
- 47.303-12 Ex dock, pier, or warehouse, port of importation. 
- 47.303-13 C. & f. destination. 
- 47.303-14 C.i.f. destination. 
- 47.303-15 F.o.b. designated air carrier’s terminal, point of exportation. 
- 47.303-16 F.o.b. designated air carrier’s terminal, point of importation. 
- 47.303-17 Contractor-prepaid commercial bills of lading, small package shipments. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 47.3 - Transportation in Supply Contracts
# L_2014212EN.01001601.xml

| 18.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 212/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 212/16

---

COUNCIL DECISION

taken by common accord with the President of the Commission,

of 17 July 2014

appointing a Member of the European Commission

(2014/469/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 246 thereof,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | On 9 February 2010, the European Council adopted Decision 2010/80/EU (2) appointing the European Commission for the period until 31 October 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 9 February 2010, the European Council adopted Decision 2010/80/EU (2) appointing the European Commission for the period until 31 October 2014.

| (2) | In a letter dated 18 June 2014, Mr José Manuel DURÃO BARROSO, President of the Commission, informed the Council that Mr Janusz LEWANDOWSKI had resigned from his post as a Member of the Commission with effect from 30 June 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In a letter dated 18 June 2014, Mr José Manuel DURÃO BARROSO, President of the Commission, informed the Council that Mr Janusz LEWANDOWSKI had resigned from his post as a Member of the Commission with effect from 30 June 2014.

| (3) | In accordance with the second paragraph of Article 246 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, a vacancy caused by resignation is to be filled for the remainder of the Member's term of office by a new Member of the same nationality. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with the second paragraph of Article 246 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, a vacancy caused by resignation is to be filled for the remainder of the Member's term of office by a new Member of the same nationality.

| (4) | A new Member of the Commission should therefore be appointed, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

A new Member of the Commission should therefore be appointed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

By common accord with Mr José Manuel DURÃO BARROSO, President of the Commission, the Council appoints Mr Jacek DOMINIK as Member of the Commission for the remainder of the term of office which runs until 31 October 2014.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 17 July 2014.

For the Council

The President

S. GOZI

---

(1)  Opinion of 16 July 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 38, 11.2.2010, p. 7.

2

---
#### In the Matter of Rosemary D. In the Matter of Ralph R. Marie L., Appellant; Angel Guardian Home, Respondent.

Appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, both dated May 21, 1979, which, *inter alia,*permanently terminated appellant’s parental rights and awarded custody of the children to the respondent for purposes of adoption. Orders affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In this case the Family Court received into evidence the entire case file of the respondent with respect to the children involved. As was noted in *Matter of Melanie Ruth JJ*(76 AD2d 1008,1009), “the mere admission of the entire case file does not automatically warrant reversal. In those instances in which the entire case file is admitted,‘fundamental fairness’ will not be violated when a [natural parent] has an opportunity to examine the file, either prior to or during the trial *(Matter of Leon RR,*48 NY2d 117,123-124).” Such an opportunity has been afforded in this case. We have considered appellant’s further points and have found them to be without merit. Accordingly, the orders are affirmed. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Lazer and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MAURICE RICARDO

PETERSON,

Petitioner,

v. Case No.: 4:20cv395-MW/MJF

RICKY D. DIXON,

Respondent.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 32. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The report and recommendation, ECF No. 32, is accepted and adopted as 

this Court’s opinion. 

2. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The amended petition for writ of 

habeas corpus, ECF No. 22, challenging the judgment and sentence in State 

of Florida v. Maurice Peterson, Gadsden County Circuit Court Case No. 

2002-CF-75, is DENIED.”

3. This Court DENIES any certificate of appealability.

Case 4:20-cv-00395-MW-MJF Document 34 Filed 06/28/22 Page 1 of 2
2

4. The Clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED on June 28, 2022.

s/Mark E. Walker ____

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00395-MW-MJF Document 34 Filed 06/28/22 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 35.1**

**WASHINGTON MUTUALBANK**

**OFFICER’SCERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE** 

           I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank(the “Servicer”), do hereby certify to WaMuAsset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”),pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofSeptember 1, 2006 (as amended, the “ServicingAgreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer,LaSalle Bank, National Association, as Trustee, and Christiana Bank& Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee,  the following withrespect to Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through CertificatesWMALT Series 2006-8 Trustfor the2006 fiscal year  (the “RelevantYear”):

1.                  A review of the activities of the Servicer duringthe Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreementhas been made under my supervision.

2.                  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout theRelevant Year. 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

                                                                                                     /s/ H. JohnBerens

| ___________________________________________Name:  H. John BerensTitle:   Senior Vice President |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|