alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

ENSTAR INCOME PROGRAM II-2, L.P.

12405 Powerscourt Drive

St. Louis, MO 63131

 

CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CORPORATE CONTROLLER (PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF PARTNERSHIP AFFAIRS) REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

I, Paul E. Martin, the Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Partnership Affairs) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission: 

fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Paul E. Martin	

Paul E. Martin

Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer and Principal 

Financial Officer of Partnership Affairs)

August 14, 2002
47.207-8 Government responsibilities.       (a) 						            The contracting officer shall state clearly the Government’s responsibilities that have a direct bearing on the contractor’s performance under the contract; *e.g.,* the Government’s responsibility to notify the contractor in advance when hazardous materials are included in a shipment.                                                         (1)                         *Advance notification.* The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-24, Advance Notification by the Government, when the Government is responsible for notifying the contractor of specific service times or unusual shipments.                                                            (2) 								                Government equipment with or without operators.                                                                           (i) 										                    The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-25, Government-Furnished Equipment With or Without Operators, when the Government furnishes equipment with or without operators.                                                                              (ii) 										                    Insert the kind of equipment and the locations where the equipment will be furnished.                                                                                                           (3)                         *Direction and marking.* The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-26, Government Direction and Marking, when office relocations are involved.                                                                             (b) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-27, Contract Not Affected by Oral Agreement.    **Parent topic:** 47.207 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and special requirements.
52.219-2 Equal Low Bids.

As prescribed in 19.309(b), insert the following provision:

Equal Low Bids (Oct 1995)

(a) This provision applies to small business concerns only.

(b) The bidder’s status as a labor surplus area (LSA) concern may affect entitlement to award in case

of tie bids. If the bidder wishes to be considered for this priority, the bidder must identify, in the

following space, the LSA in which the costs to be incurred on account of manufacturing or

production (by the bidder or the first-tier subcontractors) amount to more than 50 percent of the

contract price.

________________________________________________ ________________________________________________

(c) Failure to identify the labor surplus areas as specified in paragraph (b) of this provision will

preclude the bidder from receiving priority consideration. If the bidder is awarded a contract as a

result of receiving priority consideration under this provision and would not have otherwise received

award, the bidder shall perform the contract or cause the contract to be performed in accordance

with the obligations of an LSA concern.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.219 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,942,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      10,181,600
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,435,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,249,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          586,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,249,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,846,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,071,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (91,900)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                42,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                849,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            849,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   849,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    28.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
8.000 Scope of part.       This part deals with prioritizing sources of supplies and services for use by the Government.    **Parent topic:** Part 8 - Required Sources of Supplies and Services
36.519 Organization and direction of the

work.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-19, Organization and Direction of the Work,

in solicitations and contracts when a cost-reimbursement construction contract is contemplated.

Parent topic: Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Amalgamated Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I,
William Tay, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

February 9, 2007


/s/ William Tay, President
------------------------------------
William Tay,
Principal Executive Officer &
Principal Financial Officer
# 52.209-8 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.209 [Reserved]
# 49.501 General.

This subpart prescribes the principal contract termination clauses. This subpart does not apply to contracts that use the clause at 52.213-4, Terms and Conditions-Simplified *Acquisitions* (Other Than *Commercial Products* and *Commercial Services*). In appropriate cases, agencies *may* authorize the use of special purpose clauses, if consistent with this chapter.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 49.5 - Contract Termination Clauses
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2637 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2637

          To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,4-Benzoquinone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2006

  Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Alexander) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,4-Benzoquinone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,4-BENZOQUINONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.29.15      1,4-Benzoquinone    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 106-51-                                                   31/2009
                         4) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2914.69.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Unassociated Document


    
      

    

    Exhibit
10.1

    


    


    AMENDMENT
NO. 2

    TO

    PURCHASE
AND LICENSE AGREEMENT

    BETWEEN

    GRANDE
COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, INC.

    AND

    NORTEL
NETWORKS INC.

    


    


    This
Amendment No. 2 to the Purchase and License Agreement is made effective as of
December 31, 2008 (the “Amendment No. 2 Effective Date”) by and between Nortel
Networks Inc. (“Nortel”) and Grande Communications Networks, Inc.
(“Customer”).

    


    WHEREAS,
Customer and Nortel entered into a Purchase and License Agreement dated January
24, 2005, for the sale, licensing, and purchase of Nortel’s Products and
Services (“Agreement”) and amended the Agreement on January 24, 2008;
and

    


    WHEREAS,
Customer and Nortel now wish to, among other things, amend the Agreement to
provide for reinstatement and extension of the Term.

    


    NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, Customer
and Nortel hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

    


    1.  The
capitalized terms in this Amendment shall have the same meaning as the defined
terms in the Agreement.

    


    2.  The
parties hereby agree and acknowledge that the Agreement is reinstated as of
the

    Amendment
No. 2 Effective Date. The parties further agree that all purchases made between
December 31, 2008 and the date of execution of this Amendment shall be deemed to
have been purchased pursuant to the terms and conditions of the
Agreement.  Customer hereby ratifies and affirms all the terms and
conditions in the Agreement and agrees to be bound by all such terms and
conditions.

    


    3.  The
Term described in the preamble to the Agreement shall be amended to read as
follows:

    


    “..., and continuing until December 31,
2009 (“Term”).”

    


    4. All
other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect, except as modified above, with respect to purchases made after the
Amendment No. 2 Effective Date.

    


    5.  The
terms of this Amendment No. 2 shall supercede all oral or prior written
statements concerning the subject matter of this Amendment.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 2 to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives.

    


    
      	
              GRANDE
      COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, INC.

            	 
      	
              NORTEL
      NETWORKS INC.

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              By:

            	 
      	 
      	
              By:

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              Title:

            	
              VP Network Operations and
      Engineering

            	 
      	
              Title:

            	
              VP, US Regions

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              Date:

            	
              4/2/2009

            	 
      	
              Date:

            	
              4/3/2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

Civil Hearing Minutes

Honorable Hope T. Cannon, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case Style: IN RE: Skanska USA Civil Southeast Inc and Skanska USA Inc 

Case No.: 3:20-cv-5980/LAC-HTC

Date: May 26, 2021

Hearing: Status Conference as ordered in ECF 1161

__________________________________________________________________

Time Commenced: 10:00 a.m. Time Concluded: 

Court Reporter: DCR/Pensacola 

Court Reporter: David Deik, Phipps Court Reporting

Attorneys present for Petitioner:

Jeremy Branning

Scott Remington

Elizabeth Billhimer

Attorneys present for Defendant:

Brian Barr

Sam Geisler

Robert Kelly (AUSA, DOJ)

Thomas Gonzalez

Nikki Guntner

Thomas Gore

Jeffrey Gill

Daniel Ewert

Daniel Ewert

Steven Echsner

Hannah Pfeifler

Eric Stevenson

PROCEEDINGS:

10:00 a.m. Court in session.

11:20 a.m. Court adjourned.

__________________ 

Filed in Open Court

 May 26, 2021

Deputy Clerk: Keri Igney

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1172 Filed 05/26/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 74733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Final 
Effect of Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the 
Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS 
decision to designate a class of employees from Revere Copper and 
Brass, Detroit, Michigan, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort 
(SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 
Program Act of 2000. On October 6, 2010, as provided for under 42 
U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of 
employees as an addition to the SEC:

    All Atomic Weapons Employer employees who worked at Revere 
Copper and Brass, Detroit, Michigan, from July 24, 1943 through 
December 31, 1954, for a number of work days aggregating at least 
250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in 
combination with work days within the parameters established for one 
or more other classes of employees included in the Special Exposure 
Cohort.

    This designation became effective on November 5, 2010, as provided 
for under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on November 5, 2010, 
members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, 
became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, 
Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, 
Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can 
also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#591d1a180a191a1d1a771e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0145424052414245422f464e57">[email protected]</span></a>.

John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-30203 Filed 11-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
42.1305 Contract clauses.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.242-14, Suspension of Work, in solicitations

and contracts when a fixed-price construction or architect-engineer contract is contemplated.

(b)

(1) The contracting officer may, when contracting by negotiation, insert the clause at 52.242-15,

Stop-Work Order, in solicitations and contracts for supplies, services, or research and development.

(2) If a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated, the contracting officer shall use the clause

with its AlternateI.

(c) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.242-17, Government Delay of Work, in

solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price contract is contemplated for supplies other than

commercial or modified-commercial products. The clause use is optional when a fixed-price contract

is contemplated for services, or for supplies that are commercial or modified-commercial products.

Parent topic: Subpart 42.13 - Suspension of Work, Stop-Work Orders, and Government Delay of

Work
#### Maxine Goldfarb, Respondent, v George A. Hudson, Jr., et al., *776Defendants, and Rego Maintenance Corp., Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered July 26, 1979, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs and disbursements, and the complaint as to defendant-appellant dismissed. Plaintiff was injured while a passenger in a private automobile owned and operated by defendant Heath. Seeking in the early hours of the morning to return home to The Bronx from a discotheque in Manhattan, plaintiff hailed a taxicab driven by Heath and maintained by defendant-appellant Rego, Heath’s employer. Before starting, plaintiff offered and Heath agreed to a fixed rate of $10 for the trip. In the course of the taxi ride, Heath told plaintiff the defroster was malfunctioning. Thereupon Heath, with the acquiescence of plaintiff, proceeded to the taxi depot, turned in the cab, had plaintiff transfer to Heath’s own automobile which had been parked at the depot and continued on the way until the accident occurred. The complaint alleges, *inter alia,*that Heath was transporting plaintiff "while in the course or furtherance of his employment as a taxi driver with and for the defendant REGO.” At issue is whether defendant-appellant is. liable under the principle of *respondeat superior.*Defendant-appellant urges that the record lacks any facts which support plaintiff’s claim that the accident occurred while Heath was working for defendant-appellant. We agree with defendant-appellant. Heath’s conduct fell outside the scope of his employment. There is nothing in the record to indicate that defendant-appellant authorized or directed Heath to-have plaintiff transfer to Heath’s private automobile to continue the trip home. Neither does the record disclose any basis for plaintiff’s claim that it was within Heath’s discretion as an employee of defendant-appellant "to continue the journey in his own car for the safety of his [passenger]”. Nor has it been shown that the transfer of plaintiff to defendant-appellant’s private vehicle was within the range of things customarily done by a taxi driver for a passenger. Finally, no evidentiary facts were presented to demonstrate that defendant-appellant did anything to clothe Heath with apparent authority "to conduct himself the way he did.” (See *Ford*v *Unity Hosp.,*32 NY2d 464, 472-473.) Concur—Birns, J. P., Sullivan, Silverman, Lynch and Carro, JJ.
47.305-4 F.o.b. destination solicitations.       (a) 						            When preparing f.o.b destination solicitations, the contracting officer shall refer to 47.303 for the prescription of f.o.b. destination clauses relating to standard delivery terms.                                          (b) 						            If f.o.b. destination only offers are desired, the solicitation shall state that offers submitted on a basis other than f.o.b. destination will be rejected as nonresponsive.                                          (c) 						            When supplies will or may be purchased f.o.b. destination but inspection and acceptance will be at origin, the contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at 52.247-48, F.o.b. Destination-Evidence of Shipment.    **Parent topic:** 47.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
****Consumer Product Safety Commission**Some Crib Cornerposts May Be DangerousDocument #5027The U.S. Consumer Product SafetyCommission warns of a strangulationhazard that may exist with some cribsthat have projections on the corner-posts.Decorative knobs or cornerpostswhich extend above the crib end or sidehave caught clothing, necklaces andpacifier cords as the child moves aboutin the corner areas of the crib. Theseknobs or posts have been implicated intwo cases of brain damage and 48deaths due to strangulation.The CPSCurges that parents never tie pacifiersaround a child's neck. The Juvenile Products ManufacturersAssociation (JPMA), after being alertedto this hazard by the CPSC, developed a voluntary standard that restricts the height of crib cornerpost extensions to 1/16 inch unless the posts are high and the tops are out of reach of a child, such as where the posts are supportsfor a canopy. Most crib manufacturers have already ceased to produce cribs with post extensions. However, there may be thousands of such cribs still in consumers' homes, at garage sales, orin second-hand furniture stores. If you already own a crib with cornerpost extensions more than 1/16 inch in height, the Commission urges that you remove the extensions and discard them.  Some may be removed merely by unscrewing, while others may have to  be sawed off and sanded smooth.If you are purchasing a new or used crib, look for one that has cornerpost extensions less than 1/16 inch above the top edge of the end or side.For more information on crib safety, consumers may send a stamped self-addressed envelope to the Juvenile Products Manufacturers Association, 236 Route 38 West, Moorestown, NJ 08057. To report an unsafe consumer product or a product-related injury, consumers may call the Consumer ProductSafety Commission's toll-free hotline at 1-800-638-2772. A teletypewriter number for the hearing impaired is available at 1-800-638-8270.009611**
52.203-15 Whistleblower Protections Under

the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

of 2009.

As prescribed in 3.907-7 , use the following clause:

Whistleblower Protections Under The American Recovery And Reinvestment Act of 2009 (June 2010)

(a) The Contractor shall post notice of employees rights and remedies for whistleblower protections

provided under section 1553 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L.

111-5) (Recovery Act).

(b) The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (b), in all

subcontracts that are funded in whole or in part with Recovery Act funds.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.203 [Reserved]