alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## c r ;•'^~ T

PAU L R . NALVEN * ALEXE I SCHACH T 'MEMUK R o rNE W VOR K AND NE W JERSE Y BAN S NALVE N a SCHACH T ATTORNEY S A TLJV W i>nl;Ui > 35 0 FIFT H AVENUE , SUIT E 402 2

NE W YORK , NE W YOR K 10 1 i a TELEPHONE : (212 ) 61 8 • 5B4 0 FACSIMILE : (212)616-554 3 

# F S ' ?;r.r:: g ^rtW ^

r-- ^ fr* 

### m- H 

### 20:3

NE WJERSE YOFFIC E 7 0 SOUT H ORANG E AVENUE , SUIT E 14 5 UVINQSTON , NE WJERSE Y0703 9 TELEPHONE : (973 ) 658- 1 CO O FACSIMILf ; (S73)992-043 l

Ma y25 , 201 0 VI AEMAI L Yoland a Ayal a Bernal , Esq . Safet yEnforcemen t Branc h Offic e o fregiona l Counse l 260 1 Meacha m Blvd . For t Worth , T

X 76193-000 7 Yolanda.a.bemal@faa.go v Re : FA ACas e Numbe r2008SW2 M 9 8 I^PlDSJ^OOb S I n th e Matte ro f Mari a Tavera s \ffi( \ t^MO ' O 3 iC» Dea rMs . Bernal : This lav/ fir m represent s Mari a Tavera s i n th e above-reference d cas e an d I as k that , pursuan t t o 1 4 C.F.R . §13.220 , yo u provid e m e v^it h th e follov^in g discover yal l o f whic h is necessar yt o m ypreparatio n fo rth e hearin g tha t wil l b e hel d o n Jul y15 . 201 0 i n th e matter . 1 . Copie s o f an yan d al l medica l record s o rdocument s mentionin g o r relatin g i n an ywa yt o th e medica l o rpsychologica l treatmen t o fth e fligh t attendant , concernin g injurie s o rhar m allegedl ycause d b ym y client . 2 . Copie s o fan yan d al l exhibit s yo u inten d t o Introduc e I n evidenc e a t th e hearing . 3 . Copie s o fan yan d al l physica l evidence . Includin g documents , i n you r possessio n whic h relate s t o thi s case . 1NALVE N & SCHACH T

Than k yo u fo ryou rattentio n t o thes e requests . Ver ytrul yyours . Alexe i Schach t cc : VI AEMAI L Hon . Isaa cD . Benkin . Administrativ e La wJudg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n 1200 Ne wJerse yAvenue . S.E . Washington . D.C . 2059 0 david.benkin@dot.go v VI AU.S . MAI L Hearing Docke t Attn : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue . S.W . Wilbu rWrigh t Building . Suit e 2W201 4 Washington , D.C . 2059 1 VI AU.S . MAI L Mari a Tavera s
EXHIBIT 10.8.1


 


Amendment to the
Employment Agreement between

Nexsan Technologies, Inc. and Rik Mussman


 


11 Dec 2008


 


Rik Mussman


 


Dear
Rik,


 


This
amendment amends the employment agreement (the “Agreement”)
you and Nexsan Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
signed on November 21, 2007.  This
amendment sets forth changed compensation only. 
All other terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement remain in
force.  We encourage you to keep a copy
for your own records.


 


We
agree that:


 


On and
after execution of this amendment, you will continue in your employment with
the Company as its Chief Operating Officer (COO) pursuant to the terms and
conditions set forth herein.  You
continue to report to the CEO.  The scope
of your job as COO continues to include responsibility for Manufacturing
Operations (both Derby and San Diego), RMA departments, and Professional
Services and Customer Support departments worldwide.  There will be ‘dotted line’ reporting from
some of your direct reports to others, such as the US Operations Manager and UK
Operations Manager liasing with the CFO, and certain European support staff
liasing with their country or regional managers by example.  You will continue to have measurable
targets/goals in line with our financial projections as a prime means of
assessing your performance.  Your
responsibilities may be changed by the CEO unilaterally from time to time.


 


The
only change to the Agreement is that the section labeled “Current Salary” is
deleted and replaced with the following:


 


1.             Current Salary. 
Your salary will be $255,000.00 per year effective today.  You also are eligible, as of CQ1 2009, for
quarterly bonuses up to $18,750 per quarter based on meeting key parameters
such as revenue and margins taken from the official financial projections of
record, the exact percentage split and parameters to be determined by the CEO
and notified to you.  You must be
employed on the last of the calendar quarter to receive a bonus payment for
that quarter.  Your bonus for a calendar
quarter will be paid within a reasonable period (not to exceed 45 days)
beginning 45 days after the last day of the calendar quarter.  Your 


 

















 


salary and bonus may be
subject to review from time to time at the Company’s discretion.


 


All
other terms and conditions in the Agreement remain the same


 


Thank
you for your contributions to helping make Nexsan a great company,


 


 


Signed and agreed this 15th day of December 2008.


 


 


	
  Nexsan
  Technologies, Inc.

  	
   

  	
  Employee

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Philip Black

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Rik Mussman

  
	
  Philip Black, CEO

  	
   

  	
  Rik Mussman

  



 


2
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50369

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LOUIS GEORGE BAGLIERE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(94-CR-95(1))

August 19, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JONES and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Louis George Bagliere, Jr. pled guilty to conspiracy to manufacture

methamphetamine, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. At the time of Bagliere’s arrest

the officers seized his vehicle and money and these items subsequently were
1United States v. Ursery, 1996 WL 340815 at *16.

2

forfeited to the government. Bagliere appeals, contending that his criminal

convictions and sentence constitute a violation of the double jeopardy clause of the

fifth amendment.

This argument is foreclosed by the very recent decision in which the

SupremeCourt concluded that “in rem civilforfeitures are neither ‘punishment’ nor

criminal for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause.”1 Accordingly, this

assignment of error is meritless and the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
TITLE  
First-Year Progress Report

IDENTIFICATION NUMBER  
EPA530-R-95-044

ABSTRACT
This report describes the WasteWise program's eventful first year and
highlights some of the leading companies and trade associations that are
working with EPA to reduce solid waste and improve the environment.  The
report also highlights WasteWise partners' successes in preventing
waste, collecting recyclables, and purchasing or manufacturing recycled
products.  The report presents EPA's best estimate of waste prevented
and recyclables collected as a direct result of company WasteWise goals. 
Most importantly, the report provides many examples of cost-svaing waste
reduction actions that are being successfully implemented by companies.

CONTROLLED VOCABULARY
[To be completed by the EPA Internet librarian]

LOCAL SUBJECT INDEX
WasteWise, Solid Waste, Waste Prevention, Recycling Collection,
Purchasing Recycled Pproducts, 1994 Program Results

ORIGINATOR
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
401 M Street, SW.
Washington, DC 20460

POINT OF CONTACT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
WasteWise (5306W)
U.S. EPA
401 M Street, SW.
Washington, DC  20460

WasteWise Helpline:  800 EPA-WISE (372-9473)
Fax:  703 308-8686
E-mail:  ww@cais.net

TECHNICAL CONSTRAINTS
The Adobe Acrobat Reader, or similar reader, is required to view the
.pdf file.

DOCUMENT SIZE
62,759 bytes (ascii); 555,020 bytes (.pdf)
28 pages (original)

COVERAGE
Limited to the United States

CATALOGING SOURCE
(SAME AS ORIGINATOR)
U.S. EPA 
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5306W)
401 M Street, SW.
Washington, DC 20460

DATE LAST MODIFIED
September 1995

SUNSET DATE
N/A

AVAILABILITY  
WasteWise (5306W)
U.S. EPA
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC  20460

WasteWise Helpline:  800 EPA-WISE (372-9473)
Fax:  703 308-8686
E-mail:  ww@cais.net

AGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Printed copies are available through the distributor listed above. The
printed copy contains graphic features not found in the ascii version of
this file.
**Exhibit 34.4**

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Board of Directors and ShareholderWashington Mutual Bank

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Servicer’s Report on Assessment ofCompliance, that Washington Mutual Bank fsb (“WMB fsb”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Washington Mutual Bank and subsidiaries, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s(“SEC”) Regulation AB for the securitizations of pools of mortgage loans that were completed on or after January 1, 2006, and prior to January 1, 2007 for which WMB fsb performed servicing functions set forth in Item 1122 (d) and thatincluded one or more classes of publicly offered securities registered with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(3)(iv) and1122 (d)(4)(iii)‐(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by WMB fsb with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for WMB fsb’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management’s assertion about WMB fsb’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about WMB fsb’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determiningwhether WMB fsb performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicingactivities performed by WMB fsb during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each specific asset-backed transaction included in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed todetect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by WMB fsb during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on WMB fsb’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management’s assertion that WMB fsb complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the Platform isfairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Seattle, WashingtonFebruary 22, 2007
#### § 3555.6 State and local law.

Lenders will comply with applicable State and local laws and regulations, including the laws of American Indian tribes. Supplemental guidance will be issued in the case of any conflict with or significant differences from provisions of this part.
52.222-7 Withholding of Funds.       As prescribed in 22.407(a), insert the following clause:          Withholding of Funds (May 2014)          The Contracting Officer shall, upon his or her own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor, withhold or cause to be withheld from the Contractor under this contract or any other Federal contract with the same Prime Contractor, or any other federally assisted contract subject to prevailing wage requirements, which is held by the same Prime Contractor, so much of the accrued payments or advances as may be considered necessary to pay laborers and mechanics, including apprentices, trainees, and helpers, employed by the Contractor or any subcontractor the full amount of wages required by the contract. In the event of failure to pay any laborer or mechanic, including any apprentice, trainee, or helper, employed or working on the site of the work, all or part of the wages required by the contract, the Contracting Officer may, after written notice to the Contractor, take such action as may be necessary to cause the suspension of any further payment, advance, or guarantee of funds until such violations have ceased.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.222 [Reserved]
Subpart 24.2 - Freedom of Information Act

Parent topic: Part 24 - Protection of Privacy and Freedom of Information

24.201 Authority.

The Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.552, as amended) provides that information is to be made

available to the public either by-

(a) Publication in the Federal Register;

(b) Providing an opportunity to read and copy records at convenient locations; or

(c) Upon request, providing a copy of a reasonably described record.

24.202 Prohibitions.

(a) A proposal in the possession or control of the Government, submitted in response to a

competitive solicitation, shall not be made available to any person under the Freedom of Information

Act. This prohibition does not apply to a proposal, or any part of a proposal, that is set forth or

incorporated by reference in a contract between the Government and the contractor that submitted

the proposal. (See 10 U.S.C. 3309 and 41 U.S.C.4702.)

(b) No agency shall disclose any information obtained pursuant to 15.403-3(b) that is exempt from

disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. (See 10 U.S.C. 3705(c)(3) and 41

U.S.C.3505(b)(3).)

(c) A dispute resolution communication that is between a neutral person and a party to alternative

dispute resolution proceedings, and that may not be disclosed under 5 U.S.C.574, is exempt from

disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.552(b)(3)).

24.203 Policy.

(a) The Act specifies, among other things, how agencies shall make their records available upon

public request, imposes strict time standards for agency responses, and exempts certain records

from public disclosure. Each agency’s implementation of these requirements is located in its

respective title of the Code of Federal Regulations and referenced in subpart 24.2 of its

implementing acquisition regulations.

(b) Contracting officers may receive requests for records that may be exempted from mandatory

public disclosure. The exemptions most often applicable are those relating to classified information,

to trade secrets and confidential commercial or financial information, to interagency or intra-agency

memoranda, or to personal and medical information pertaining to an individual. Other exemptions

include agency personnel practices, and law enforcement. Since these requests often involve

complex issues requiring an in-depth knowledge of a large and increasing body of court rulings and

policy guidance, contracting officers are cautioned to comply with the implementing regulations of
their agency and to obtain necessary guidance from the agency officials having Freedom of

Information Act responsibility. If additional assistance is needed, authorized agency officials may

contact the Department of Justice, Office of Information and Privacy. A Freedom of Information Act

guide and other resources are available at the Department of Justice website under FOIA reference

materials: http://www.usdoj.gov/oip.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           1,022
<SECURITIES>                                       171
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                       294
<INVENTORY>                                        766
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,356
<PP&E>                                             867
<DEPRECIATION>                                     637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,875
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,200
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,895
<SALES>                                         12,572
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,572
<CGS>                                           11,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    12
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    150
<INCOME-TAX>                                        40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                110
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       110
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
§ 51.884 U.S. No. 1 Table. “U.S. No. 1 Table” consists of bunches of well developed grapes of one variety, except when designated as assorted varieties, which are at least fairly well colored, uniform in appearance when so specified in connection with the grade, and which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements for berries: ( 1 ) Mature;
( 2 ) Firm;
( 3 ) Firmly attached to capstem;
( 4 ) Not weak;
( 5 ) Not materially shriveled at capstem;
( 6 ) Not shattered;
( 7 ) Not split or crushed;
( 8 ) Not wet.
( b ) Basic requirements for bunches: ( 1 ) Not straggly.
( c ) Basic requirements for stems: ( 1 ) Not weak, or dry and brittle.
( d ) Berries free from: ( 1 ) Decay;
( 2 ) Waterberry;
( 3 ) Sunburn.
( e ) Stems free from: ( 1 ) Mold;
( 2 ) Decay.
( f ) Berries not damaged by: ( 1 ) Any other cause.
( g ) Bunches not damaged by: ( 1 ) Shot berries;
( 2 ) Dried berries;
( 3 ) Other defective berries;
( 4 ) Trimming away of defective berries;
( 5 ) Any other cause.
( h ) Stems not damaged by: ( 1 ) Freezing;
( 2 ) Any other cause.
( i ) Size: ( 1 ) For berries: Exclusive of shot berries and dried berries, 75 percent, by count, of the berries on each bunch shall have the minimum diameters indicated for varieties as follows: ( i ) Thompson Seedless, Perlette, Delight, Beauty Seedless, Sugraone, Flame Seedless and other seedless varieties nine-sixteenths of an inch.
( ii ) Other varieties ten-sixteenths of an inch.
( 2 ) For bunches: ( i ) Not less than one-fourth pound.
( j ) For tolerances see § 51.886.
[36 FR 9126, May 20, 1971. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, and amended at 48 FR 19350, Apr. 29, 1983; 56 FR 15802, Apr. 18, 1991; 64 FR 14576, Mar. 26, 1999]
#### Leslie Feher, Appellant, v John Jay College of Criminal Justice et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 18, 2007;

decided September 4, 2007

Reported below, 37 AD3d 307.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal to that Court from the March 2006 and July 2006 orders of Supreme Court, dismissed upon the ground that such part of the order does not finally determine an action or proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Bond Laboratories, Inc.., (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott
      Landow, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




BOND LABORATORIES,
                    INC.By
                  /s/
                    Scott LandowScott
                    LandowChief Financial officerMarch
                        28, 2008
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:00-cr-00015-SPM-AK

LINDA WILSON,

Defendant.

___________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1106, Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255,

by Linda Wilson, with attached memorandum of law, and Docs. 1152 and 1162, which are

supplements to the motion. The Government has filed its response, Doc. 1169, and Correction,

Doc. 1172. Defendant has been released from custody and is presently being supervised in

South Carolina. Docs. 1200 & 1207.

The sole issue in the motion to vacate is whether the Court improperly sentenced

Defendant “in excess of that allowed by law based on facts not admitted or found by jury, in

violation of Sixth Amendment.” Doc. 1106 at 5. Defendant’s claims are foreclosed from

review, as Booker has not been made retroactive to cases on collateral review. Varela v. United

States, 400 F.3d 864 (11th Cir. 2005); In re Anderson, 396 F.3d 1336 (11th Cir. 2005).

Case 1:00-cr-00015-MW-GRJ Document 1215 Filed 06/21/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:00-cr-00015-SPM-AK

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the motion to vacate,

Doc. 1106, be DENIED.

IN CHAMBERS at Gainesville, Florida, this 21st day of June, 2007.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations

within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may

respond to another party’s objections within 10 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure

to file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case 1:00-cr-00015-MW-GRJ Document 1215 Filed 06/21/07 Page 2 of 2