alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Day 1248 1259 1286 1302 1315 1364 1435 1484 1589 1650 15941 0.32 18.88 27.01 16.82 16.67 26 30.5 30.5 0.29 13.22 13.62 15.53 15.77 28.73 12.97 12.76 28.27 27.52 27.52 7.96 7.64 30.053 17.43 20.71 28.67 9.49 9.57 27.59 29.07 29.07 8.88 9.53 32.884 16.57 22.61 27.95 10.43 10.58 37.25 24.64 24.64 8.44 1.71 32.595 18.3 19.67 7.66 9.44 9.64 28.78 23.82 23.82 9.33 7.66 28.736 17.06 25.9 7.49 11.47 11.71 7.72 24.52 24.52 8.69 0.32 34.147 16.57 22.63 7.58 13.59 13.83 42.98 25.14 25.14 8.44 14.12 32.338 21 21.21 8.12 12.85 12.72 25.28 26.46 26.46 10.71 13.7 23.389 16.57 5.07 23.93 4.3 4.38 24.67 25.49 25.49 8.44 12.72 3510 16.57 44.96 22.61 12.04 12.29 25.39 38.6 38.6 8.44 11.24 32.9111 16.57 34.37 23.06 21.41 20.55 24.24 24.65 24.65 8.44 10.56 31.4412 16.57 13.46 24.21 13.65 13.82 23.34 29.45 29.45 8.44 9.82 27.4813 16.57 11.57 25.25 12.44 12.54 25.04 25.04 25.04 8.44 12.92 28.5514 20.45 13.9 21.47 16.52 16.66 23.65 29.91 29.91 10.43 13.7 25.1915 16.57 27.43 25.53 22.02 22.51 26.83 1.43 1.43 8.44 9.46 25.6316 16.99 25.55 25.89 12.31 12.31 27.19 5.07 5.07 8.66 7.66 10.0117 16.6 21.95 29.34 15.39 15.11 24.25 25.97 25.97 8.46 12.36 28.0318 16.57 12.1 26.03 13.51 13.59 25.28 29.3 29.3 8.44 13.98 30.2719 16.57 12.83 7.6 3.75 3.82 24.83 26.93 26.93 8.44 9.4 25.8520 16.57 9.18 24.26 9.4 9.59 23.88 26.63 26.63 8.44 8.68 33.3621 16.57 8.74 23.68 10.88 11.06 23.69 24.82 24.82 8.44 7.6 29.122 16.57 17.63 19.77 12.45 12.35 21.74 24.11 24.11 8.44 7.62 26.9123 16.65 47.3 21.97 11.76 11.89 26.04 22 22 8.48 7.63 29.724 19.14 33.53 22.8 11.73 11.75 7.28 22 22 9.76 8.2 30.0225 21.37 19.11 23.23 60.15 61.31 26.36 22 22 10.9 11.27 10.9126 16.57 25.09 31.24 20.59 19.93 36.12 35.74 35.74 8.44 8.93 11.8727 16.57 14.94 30.64 13.96 14.1 28.96 24.47 24.47 8.44 7.64 14.0428 16.57 17.89 32.58 21.9 21.19 29.82 38.69 38.69 8.44 7.6 13.4929 16.3 24.46 28.53 12.74 11.85 29.05 27.28 27.28 8.3 15.7230 16.58 39.85 28.41 27.66 26.93 26.93 8.45 13.7531 12.9523.83 23.833224.11 24.113327.28 27.283424.82 24.823524.47 24.47Daily Mercury Emissions (lb/MM tons feed) for Each Kiln (coded)ni=number runs3031293030293535302830ni-12930282929283434292729Mean16.62821.3303222.6493115.27915.25825.9144825.5054325.505438.4789.53178625.231Auto Correlation0.2020.2010.5430.1020.084-0.1870.2380.2360.190.1950.532Mean19.21007Observed Variance90.5988Auto Correlation109.8387Intra quarry RSD0.573provided by KeithIntra quarry Variance121.1622Intra quarry Auto Correlation0.341Hg Limestone Autocorrelation Provided by KeithVariance adj for Auto Corr162.4785total variance272.3172SQRT(Variance*(1/n+1/m))5.816644t (n-1) = 3262.326UPL32.7lb/MM tons feed
47.208-2 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-68, Report of Shipment (REPSHIP), in

solicitations and contracts when advance notice of shipment is required for safety or security

reasons, or where carload or truckload shipments will be made to DoD installations or, as required,

to civilian agency facilities.

Parent topic: 47.208 Report of shipment (REPSHIP).
Case No. 3:20cv5576-MCR-EMT

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

REGINALD TYRELL FREEMAN,

Inmate No. 04024031,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5576-MCR-EMT

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on April 30, 

2021. ECF No. 13. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.
Case No. 3:20cv5576-MCR-EMT

Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 

13, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure 

to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

Order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of June 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### § 51.2654 Clean.

*Clean* means that the cherries are practically free from dirt, dust, spray residue, or other foreign material.
Exhibit 32
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned sole officer of BioCube, Inc.., (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)    The annual Report on form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended January 31, 2011 (“the Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 
 (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: May 17, 2011
By:
/s/ Boris RubizhevskyBoris Rubizhevsky

Chief Executive and Financial Officer
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

THOMAS WEAVER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:03CV364-SPM/AK

RONALD SARGENT, et al,

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

In an order dated February 7, 2005, 2003, Plaintiff was directed to file a second

amended complaint by March 4, 2005. (Doc. 11). An Order to Show Cause (doc. 12)

was entered on April 15, 2005, directing a response by April 28, 2005, but as of this

date there has been no response and no second amended complaint has been filed. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash Railroad, 370 U.S. 626, 82 S. Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed2d 734

(1962). Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) also authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for

failure to obey a court order. Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order of this Court or

Case 4:03-cv-00364-SPM-AK Document 13 Filed 06/17/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

No. 1:03cv38-MMP/AK

otherwise communicate with the Court about his case. Consequently, this case should

be dismissed.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Gainesville, Florida, this 17th day of June, 2005.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s objections within 10 days after

being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of

review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case 4:03-cv-00364-SPM-AK Document 13 Filed 06/17/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.



--------------------------------------------------------------------





In connection with the Annual Report of Zulu Energy Corp., (the "Company") on Form 10KSB for the year ended  June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Paul Stroud, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  October 10, 2007



s/s  Paul Stroud

Paul Stroud, Chief Executive Officer
#### § 51.3065 Fairly well formed.

*Fairly well formed* means that the avocado may be slightly abnormal in shape but not to the extent that the appearance is seriously affected.
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Atheron Inc.
      for the year ended August 31, 2007, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Atheron Inc. for the year ended August
              31,
              2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of the
              Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
              ended August 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects, the
              financial condition and results of operations of Atheron
              Inc..
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                Susanna HilarioName:
            Susanna
                HilarioTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer,
              Principal
                Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
            November
                1, 2007
28.203-4 Solicitation provision and contract

clause.

(a)Insert the provision at 52.228-17, Individual Surety—Pledge of Assets (Bid Guarantee), in

solicitations that require the submission of a bid guarantee.

(b)Insert the clause at 52.228-11, Individual Surety—Pledge of Assets, in solicitations and contracts

that require the submission of performance or payment bonds.

Parent topic: 28.203 Individual Sureties.
Exhibit 99.1

                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                 PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of uniView
 Technologies Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31,
 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
 hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick A. Custer, Chief Executive Officer
 and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. S1350, as adopted pursuant to S906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
 of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.


                                    /s/ PATRICK A. CUSTER
                                    Patrick A. Custer
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Principal Financial Officer

 June 17, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter  ended June 30, 1997 for May Limited  Partnership  1984-1 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000757525
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1984-1
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                         228
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               346
<PP&E>                                         8,108
<DEPRECIATION>                                 8,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381
<SALES>                                        430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               442
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  75
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                367
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            367
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   367
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  42.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  42.08
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Entremetrix Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George LeFevre, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)        Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Dated:           August 14, 2006 | /s/ George LeFevre            |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                             | By:  George LeFevre           |
|                             | Its:  Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Entremetrix Corporation and will be retained by Entremetrix Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
52.219-17 Section 8(a) Award.

As prescribed in 19.811-3(c), insert the following clause:

Section8(a) Award (Oct 2019)

(a) By execution of a contract, the Small Business Administration (SBA) agrees to the following:

(1) To furnish the supplies or services set forth in the contract according to the specifications and

the terms and conditions by subcontracting with the Offeror who has been determined an eligible

concern pursuant to the provisions of section8(a) of the Small Business Act, as amended (15

U.S.C.637(a)).

(2) Except for novation agreements, delegates to the ______ [insert name of contracting activity]the

responsibility for administering the contract with complete authority to take any action on behalf of

the Government under the terms and conditions of the contract; provided, however that the

contracting agency shall give advance notice to the SBA before it issues a final notice terminating

the right of the subcontractor to proceed with further performance, either in whole or in part, under

the contract.

(3) That payments to be made under the contract will be made directly to the subcontractor by the

contracting activity.

(4) To notify the ___________ [insert name of contracting agency] Contracting Officer immediately

upon notification by the subcontractor that the owner or owners upon whom 8(a) eligibility was

based plan to relinquish ownership or control of the concern.

(5) That the subcontractor awarded a subcontract hereunder shall have the right of appeal from

decisions of the cognizant Contracting Officer under the "Disputes" clause of the subcontract.

(b) The offeror/subcontractor agrees and acknowledges that it will, for and on behalf of the SBA,

fulfill and perform all of the requirements of the contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.219 [Reserved]
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 5:96cr20LAC

MARK HARRIS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on August 29, 2006 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER (DE-120) DENYING

MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 60(b)(6) ORDER

OF AUGUST 3, 2006 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 8/17/2006 Doc.# 122

RESPONSES:

on Doc.# _________________

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 30

th day of

August, 2006, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 5:96-cr-00020-LC-MD Document 123 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 1
25.105 Critical components and critical

items.

(a) The following is a list of articles that have been determined to be a critical component or critical

item and their respective preference factor(s).

(1)-(2) [Reserved]

(b) The list of articles and preference factors in paragraph (a) of this section will be published in the

Federal Register for public comment no less frequently than once every 4 years. Unsolicited

recommendations for deletions from this list may be submitted at any time and should provide

sufficient data and rationale to permit evaluation ( see 1.502).

(c) For determining reasonableness of cost for domestic end products that contain critical

components or are critical items ( see 25.106(c)).

Parent topic: Subpart 25.1 - Buy American-Supplies
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Building DesignEducational EnvironmentElementary Secondary EducationEnvironmental InfluencesPreventionSchool SafetySchool SecurityVisual Environment

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
EXHIBIT A

Case 1:20-cv-00224-AW-GRJ Document 5-1 Filed 10/09/20 Page 1 of 2
·

·

·

·

·

authorize Plaintiff’s counsel to reuse this Consent Form to re

Case 1:20-cv-00224-AW-GRJ Document 5-1 Filed 10/09/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 51.1997 Similar type.

*Similar type* means that the filberts in each container are of the same general type and appearance. For example, nuts of the round type shall not be mixed with those of the long type in the same container.
#### § 51.322 Metric conversion table.

| Inches | Millimeters (mm) |
| --- | --- |
| 1/16 equals | 1.6 |
| 1/8 equals | 3.2 |
| 3/16 equals | 4.8 |
| 1/4 equals | 6.4 |
| 3/8 equals | 9.5 |
| 1/2 equals | 12.7 |
| 5/8 equals | 15.9 |
| 3/4 equals | 19.1 |
| 7/8 equals | 22.2 |
| 11/8 equals | 28.6 |
| 21/8 equals | 54.0 |
| 21/4 equals | 57.2 |
| 23/8 equals | 60.3 |
| 21/2 equals | 63.5 |
| 23/4 equals | 69.9 |

| Cubic Inches | Cubic Centimeters (cc) |
| --- | --- |
| 2100 equals | 34,412.7 |
| 2900 equals | 47,522.3 |

| Pounds | Grams (g) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 equals | 4,536.0 |
| 37 equals | 16,783.2 |
| 40 equals | 18,144.0 |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7277

DAVID G. CLARK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:20-cv-00294-AWA-RJK)

Submitted: January 10, 2023 Decided: February 1, 2023

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David G. Clark, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7277 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/01/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

David G. Clark seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust state court remedies. The district 

court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The 

magistrate judge recommended dismissal of the petition and advised Clark that failure to 

file timely objections to this recommendation would waive appellate review of a district 

court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary 

to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have 

been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v. Duffy, 858 F.3d 239, 245 

(4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 846-47 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas 

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154-55 (1985). Clark has waived appellate review by failing to file 

objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7277 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/01/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
#### § 58.222 Dry dairy product cooling equipment.

Cooling equipment shall be provided with sufficient capacity to cool the product as specified in § 58.240. A suitable dry air supply with an effective filtering system meeting the requirements of § 58.220(a) shall be provided where air cooling and conveying is used.