alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ethel Famulare et al., Respondents, v Huntington Hospital, Defendant, and Michael S. Mamakos, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, defendant Mamakos appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 29, 1979, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations and (2) an order of the same court dated November 28, 1979, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination. Appeal from order dated August 29, 1979 dismissed. The order was superseded by the order dated November 28, 1979. Order dated November 28, 1979 reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, order dated August 29, 1979 vacated insofar as it denied appellant’s motion, said motion granted and complaint dismissed. The appellant is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable by the respondents. Special Term erred in holding that a fragment of a broken tooth left remaining in the lip of plaintiff Ethel Famulare (hereinafter plaintiff) constituted a "foreign object” for purposes of tolling the Statute of Limitations in medical malpractice actions within the meaning of the rule enunciated in *Flanagan v Mount Eden Gen. Hosp.*(24 NY2d 427). In the recent case of *Ferrante v Lee*(75 AD2d 728), this court refused to apply the *Flanagan*rule where a portion of the root of a tooth had been negligently left by a surgeon who had excised a tumor (see, also, *Florio v Cook,*48 NY2d 792; *Matter of Smalls v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*and *Merced v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*44 NY2d 398; *O’Leary v Williams-burgh Gen. Hosp., 78*AD2d 541). Moreover, since there was no allegation in the complaint—or at any time subsequent—that the appellant willfully intended to defraud or mislead the plaintiff concerning her condition, plaintiffs’ claim that he should be estopped from asserting the Statute of Limitations as a defense must be rejected (see *Florio v Cook, supra; Immediate*v *St. John’s Queens Hosp.,*48 NY2d 671; cf. *Simcuski v Saeli,*44 NY2d 442). Damiani, J. P., Gibbons, Rabin and Margett, JJ., concur.
52.208-5 Condition of Leased Vehicles.       As prescribed in 8.1104(b), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for leasing motor vehicles, unless the motor vehicles are leased in foreign countries:          Condition of Leased Vehicles (Apr 1984)          Each vehicle furnished under this contract shall be of good quality and in safe operating condition, and shall comply with the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (49 CFR571) and State safety regulations applicable to the vehicle. The Government shall accept or reject the vehicles promptly after receipt. If the Contracting Officer determines that any vehicle furnished is not in compliance with this contract, the Contracting Officer shall promptly inform the Contractor in writing. If the Contractor fails to replace the vehicle or correct the defects as required by the Contracting Officer, the Government may-                                       (a) 						            By contract or otherwise, correct the defect or arrange for the lease of a similar vehicle and shall charge or set off against the Contractor any excess costs occasioned thereby; or                                          (b) 						            Terminate the contract under the Default clause of this contract.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.208 [Reserved]
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Highland Distressed Opportunities, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Not applicable;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ M. Jason BlackburnM. Jason BlackburnSecretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
47.303-13 C. & f. destination.       (a)                   *Explanation of delivery term.*"C.&f. (cost & freight) destination" means free of expense to the Government delivered on board the ocean vessel to the specified point of destination, with the cost of transportation paid by the contractor.                                          (b)                   *Contractor responsibilities.* The contractor shall-                                                         (1)                                                                           (i) 										                    Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or                                                                              (ii) 										                    In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment for ocean transportation in conformance with carrier requirements;                                                                                                           (2)                                                                           (i) 										                    Deliver the shipment in good order and condition; and                                                                              (ii) 										                    Pay and bear all applicable charges to the point of destination specified in the contract, including transportation costs and export taxes or other fees or charges levied because of exportation;                                                                                                           (3) 								                Obtain and dispatch promptly to the Government clean on-board ocean bills of lading to the specified point of destination.                                                            (4) 								                Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before delivery; and                                                            (5) 								                At the Government’s request and expense, provide certificates of origin, consular invoices, or any other documents issued in the country of origin or of shipment, or both, that may be required for importation into the country of destination.                                                                             (c)                   *Contract clause.* The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at 52.247-41, C.&f. Destination, when the delivery term is c.&f. (Cost & freight) destination.    **Parent topic:** 47.303 Standard delivery terms and contract clauses.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2496 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2496

  To expand the definition of immediate relative for purposes of the 
                    Immigration and Nationality Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 3, 2006

 Mr. Kohl (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To expand the definition of immediate relative for purposes of the 
                    Immigration and Nationality Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF IMMEDIATE RELATIVE.

    Section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1151(b)(2)(A)(i)) is amended by inserting ``For purposes of this 
subsection, a child of a parent of a citizen of the United States shall 
be considered an immediate relative if the child is accompanying or 
following to join the parent.'' after ``at least 21 years of age.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 58.18 Inspection or grading certificates, memoranda, or reports.

Inspection or grading certificates and sampling, plant survey, and other memoranda or reports shall be issued on forms approved by the Administrator.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000757545
<NAME> 84A
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         148,627
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  181,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               329,855
<PP&E>                                      18,230,928
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,376,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,184,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,496
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,121,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,184,314
<SALES>                                        875,204
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               884,864
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,097,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (212,388)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (212,388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (212,388)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (11.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
7.202 Policy.

(a) Agencies are required by 10 U.S.C. 3242 and 41 U.S.C.3310 to procure supplies in such quantity

as-

(1) Will result in the total cost and unit cost most advantageous to the Government, where

practicable; and

(2) Does not exceed the quantity reasonably expected to be required by the agency.

(b) Each solicitation for a contract for supplies is required, if practicable, to include a provision

inviting each offeror responding to the solicitation-

(1) To state an opinion on whether the quantity of the supplies proposed to be acquired is

economically advantageous to the Government; and

(2) If applicable, to recommend a quantity or quantities which would be more economically

advantageous to the Government. Each such recommendation is required to include a quotation of

the total price and the unit price for supplies procured in each recommended quantity.

Parent topic: Subpart 7.2 - Planning for the Purchase of Supplies in Economic Quantities
# 52.214-33 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.214 [Reserved]
§ 51.1858 U.S. No. 3. “U.S. No. 3” consists of tomatoes which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Similar varietal characteristics;
( 2 ) Mature;
( 3 ) Not overripe or soft;
( 4 ) Clean;
( 5 ) Well developed; and,
( 6 ) May be mishapen.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Decay; and,
( 2 ) Freezing injury.
( c ) Not seriously damaged by: ( 1 ) Sunscald.
( d ) Not very seriously damaged by any other cause.
( e ) For tolerances see § 51.1861.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ian Spowart, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Liberty Energy Corp.
      for the year ended July 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Liberty Energy Corp.                                                           

Dated: November 9, 2011

| | /s/
      Ian Spowart        
| | -----------------------------
| | Ian Spowart                  
| | President and Director       
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| | Liberty Energy Corp.         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Liberty Energy
Corp. and will be retained by Liberty Energy Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00043-CR

Shawn Siddique Abbasi, Appellant 

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-11-904090, HONORABLE CLIFFORD BROWN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Shawn Siddique Abbasi seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for the

second-degree felony of attempted sexual assault. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 15.01 (West 2011).

The district court imposed sentence on December 9, 2011, and there was no timely motion for new

trial; thus the deadline for perfecting appeal was January 9, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).

Abbasi filed his notice of appeal on January 18, 2012. He did not request an extension of time for

filing the notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Nor is there any indication that he properly

mailed his notice of appeal to the district clerk within the time prescribed by Rule 26.2(a)(1). See

Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b)(1)(C), 26.2(a)(1).
Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of this purported appeal

in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 1

522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (concluding that when belated notice of appeal is filed without

timely motion for extension of time appellate court must dismiss purported appeal for lack

of jurisdiction); see Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (holding that

amendments to rules of appellate procedure did not affect Olivo’s rationale requiring timely notice

of appeal to vest appellate court with jurisdiction).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: March 21, 2012

Do Not Publish

Any remedy Abbasi may have would be sought before the Texas Court of Criminal 1

Appeals. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2011).

2
#### § 612.1 Purpose and scope.

This part sets forth Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) policy and procedure for the administration of a cooperative snow survey and water supply forecast program. The program provides agricultural water users and other water management groups in the western states area with water supply forecasts to enable them to plan for efficient water management. The program also provides the public and the scientific community with a data base that can be used to accurately determine the extent of the now resource. The western states area comprises Alaska, Arizona, California (east side of the Sierra Nevada mountain range only), Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Educational AttainmentEnglish (Second Language)ImmigrantsProfessional DevelopmentProgram DesignProgram EffectivenessProgram ImplementationSecond Language InstructionSecondary EducationSecondary School StudentsStudent Placement

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
52.219-31 Notice of Small Business Reserve.       As prescribed in 19.507(g)(1), insert the following provision:          Notice of Small Business Reserve (Mar 2020)                                       (a) 						            This solicitation contains a reserve for one or more small business concerns identified at 19.000(a)(3). The small business program eligibility requirements apply.                                          (b) 						            The small business concern(s) eligible for participation in the reserve shall submit one offer that addresses each portion of the solicitation for which it wants to compete. Award of the contract will be based on criteria identified elsewhere in the solicitation.                                 (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.219 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32(ii)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In  connection  with the Form 10-K of National Bankshares, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2006, I, J. Robert Buchanan, Treasurer of National
Bankshares, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief that:

(1) such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securties Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.


/s/ J. ROBERT BUCHANAN
---------------------------------
J. Robert Buchanan
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
### ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form , Re vision 2
. 5 Page 1 of 1 1/15/ 10 

### AD Title: Champion (Slick) Magnetos with Migrated Stop Pin Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 0085 Directorate Identifier: 2000

- NE
- 19

- AD Costs: Costs per Product (e.g., engine, propeller) Action (e.g., Inspection, replacem ent) Work

h ours Labor cost ( @ $8 5 /hour) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

U.S. Registered Products Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet Inspection of Records 1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 100 $ 8,500 I nspection of Engines (added models only) 1.0 $ 85. 00 $0 $ 85.00 100 $ 8,500 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0



### Total Cost s of compliance for U

. S

. fleet: $ 17,00 0



### Costs covered under warranty Special considerations for Econom ic Analysis : Only the RR O

- 300 m odels are addressed in the economic analysis as they are newly added in this release. Acurate data on exisitng models in se rvice is not available. An estmate is provided from TCM based on market knowledge. Full warranty replacement is provided by the per Service Bulletins for any affected units. 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory act ion”? YES explain below NO DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? YES explain below NO Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant econ omic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES explain below NO
Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for a ircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES explain below NO 

### Explanation:
Exhibit 12.1

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael Minhong Yu, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 on Form 20-F/A to annual report on Form 20-F of New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: August 3, 2009



By:

/s/ Michael Minhong YuName:

Michael Minhong YuTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer