alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          69,242
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,137,719
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    949,831
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,336,412
<PP&E>                                         337,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,080,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,242,182
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,128,370
<COMMON>                                       143,521
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,080,390
<SALES>                                        832,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               832,964
<CGS>                                          546,155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  546,155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               923,490
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             216,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (341,705)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (341,705)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.024)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.024)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,394,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,666,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   267,000
<INVENTORY>                                 22,510,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,519,000
<PP&E>                                      18,101,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,313,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,694,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,632,000
<BONDS>                                      3,451,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,529,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,625,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,694,000
<SALES>                                     28,534,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,534,000
<CGS>                                       18,120,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,734,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (12,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             668,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,144,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   746,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,398,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,398,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>
#### § 58.31 Reinspection or regrading certificate or report.

Immediately after a reinspection or regrading has been completed, a reinspection or a regrading certificate or report shall be issued showing the results of such reinspection or regrading; and such certificate or report shall thereupon supersede, as of the time of issuance, the inspection or grading certificate or report previously issued. Each reinspection or regrading certificate or report shall clearly set forth the number and date of the inspection or grading certificate or report that it supersedes. The provisions of §§ 58.18 through 58.21 shall, whenever applicable, also apply to reinspection or regrading certificates or reports except that copies shall be furnished each interested party of record.
#### § 58.936 Milk.

To process and package evaporated and condensed milk of ultra-pasteurized dairy products eligible for official identification with the USDA Quality Approved Inspection Shield the raw incoming milk shall meet the requirements as outlined in §§ 58.132 through 58.136. Unless processed within two hours after being received, it shall be cooled to, and held at a temperature of 45 °F or lower until processed.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Heelys, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Thomas C. Hansen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Craig D. Storey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 10, 2011
By:
/s/ THOMAS C. HANSENThomas C. Hansen

Chief Executive OfficerBy:
/s/ CRAIG D. STOREYCraig D. Storey

Chief Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an Exhibit to the Report.
# 36.511 Use and possession prior to completion.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.236-11, Use and Possession Prior to Completion, in *solicitations* and contracts when a fixed-price *construction* contract is contemplated and the contract award amount is expected to exceed the *simplified acquisition threshold*. This clause *may* be inserted in *solicitations* and contracts when the contract amount is expected to be at or below the *simplified acquisition threshold*.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
whc101.htm


    Exhibit
10.1

    


    


    AMENDMENT
TO STOCK OPTIONS GRANTED UNDER THE

    WHITNEY
HOLDING CORPORATION 2007 LONG-TERM COMPENSATION PLAN

    


    


    Effective
February 17, 2009, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board
of Directors of Whitney Holding Corporation (the “Company”) approved an
amendment to all outstanding stock options granted under the Company’s 2007
Long-Term Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), to provide that if an optionee’s
employment ceases on account of Retirement (as defined in the Plan), the stock
options that are then exercisable (after giving effect to any accelerated
vesting as provided in the Plan or other agreement governing such options) shall
remain outstanding and exercisable until the earlier of the regular expiration
date or three years; provided,
however, that the stock options shall expire immediately upon the
optionee’s acceptance of a position with a new employer in the financial
services industry within 12 months of his or her Retirement from the
Company.
52.103 Identification of provisions and

clauses.

(a) Whenever any FAR provision or clause is used without deviation in a solicitation or contract,

whether it is incorporated by reference or in full text, it shall be identified by number, title, and date.

This identification shall also be used if the FAR provision or clause is used with an authorized

deviation, except that the contracting officer shall then insert "(DEVIATION)" after the date.

Solicited firms and contractors will be advised of the meaning of this insertion through the use of the

(1) provision at 52.252-5, Authorized Deviations in Provisions, or (2) clause at 52.252-6, Authorized

Deviations in Clauses. The above mentioned provision and clause are prescribed in 52.107(e) and (f).

(b) Any provision or clause that supplements the FAR whether it is incorporated by reference or in

full text shall be clearly identified by number, title, date, and name of the regulation. When a

supplemental provision or clause is used with an authorized deviation, insert "(DEVIATION)" after

the name of the regulation.

(c) A provision or clause of the type described in 52.101(b)(2)(i)(C) shall be identified by the title,

date, and the name of the agency or suborganization within the agency that developed it.

(d) Except for provisions or clauses covered by 52.103(c), the following hypothetical examples

illustrate how a provision or clause that supplements the FAR shall be identified when it is

incorporated in solicitations and/or contracts by reference or in full text:

(1) If part 14 (Sealed Bidding) of the X Agency Acquisition Regulation, published in the Federal

Register and codified as Chapter 99 in 48 CFR, prescribes the use of a provision entitled "Bid

Envelopes," dated October 1983, and that provision is sequentially the first provision or clause

appearing in Section 52.214 of the X Agency Acquisition Regulation, then the identification of that

provision shall be "9952.214-70-Bid Envelopes (Oct 1983)."

(2) Assume that Y, a major organizational element of the X Agency, is authorized to issue the Y

Acquisition Regulation, which is not published in the Federal Register and codified in 48 CFR. If

part 36 (Construction and Architect-Engineer Contracts) of the Y Acquisition Regulation prescribes

the use of a clause entitled "Refrigerated Display Cases," dated March 1983, pertaining to a

specialized type of construction work, and that clause is sequentially the second provision or clause

appearing in Section 52.236 of the Y Acquisition Regulation, then the identification of that clause

shall be "52.236-71-Refrigerated Display Cases (Mar 1983)-Y Acquisition Regulation."

Parent topic: Subpart 52.1 - Instructions for Using Provisions and Clauses
52.208-5 Condition of Leased Vehicles.

As prescribed in 8.1104(b), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for leasing

motor vehicles, unless the motor vehicles are leased in foreign countries:

Condition of Leased Vehicles (Apr 1984)

Each vehicle furnished under this contract shall be of good quality and in safe operating condition,

and shall comply with the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (49 CFR571) and State safety

regulations applicable to the vehicle. The Government shall accept or reject the vehicles promptly

after receipt. If the Contracting Officer determines that any vehicle furnished is not in compliance

with this contract, the Contracting Officer shall promptly inform the Contractor in writing. If the

Contractor fails to replace the vehicle or correct the defects as required by the Contracting Officer,

the Government may-

(a) By contract or otherwise, correct the defect or arrange for the lease of a similar vehicle and shall

charge or set off against the Contractor any excess costs occasioned thereby; or

(b) Terminate the contract under the Default clause of this contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.208 [Reserved]
You can **DOWNLOAD THIS REPORT (3,895 KB)** and **APPENDIXES 1-3 (791 KB)** in **Portable Document Format** (PDF) **NOTE: The report is a large file and could take awhile to download on some computers. If you don't wish to tie up your browser during this download, then right click, choose "save target as" and choose the location in which you want to download this PDF file. Then, when you do open it, it will open more quickly from your local system.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      10,021,481
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     151,898,830
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,305,653
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 32,221,441
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    148,968,149
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,322,642
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             206,976,244
<DEPOSITS>                                 180,799,611
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,167,928
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,834,327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       798,099
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,378,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             206,976,244
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,713,242
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              916,286
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               235,679
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             8,865,207
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,163,151
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,240,826
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,624,381
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,094,868
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,487,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,182,049
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,182,049
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   851,472
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.10
<LOANS-NON>                                    906,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   198,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,707,913
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  612,595
<RECOVERIES>                                   132,457
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,322,643
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,322,643
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel.       As prescribed in 4.1303, insert the following clause:          Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel (Jan ****2011)                                       (a) 						            The Contractor shall comply with agency personal identity verification procedures identified in the contract that implement Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12 (HSPD-12), Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance M-05-24 and Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS PUB) Number 201.                                          (b) 						            The Contractor shall account for all forms of Government-provided identification issued to the Contractor employees in connection with performance under this contract. The Contractor shall return such identification to the issuing agency at the earliest of any of the following, unless otherwise determined by the Government:                                                         (1) 								                When no longer needed for contract performance.                                                            (2) 								                Upon completion of the Contractor employee’s employment.                                                            (3) 								                Upon contract completion or termination.                                                                             (c) 						            The Contracting Officer may delay final payment under a contract if the Contractor fails to comply with these requirements.                                          (d) 						            The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (d), in all subcontracts when the subcontractor’s employees are required to have routine physical access to a Federally-controlled facility and/or routine access to a Federally-controlled information system. It shall be the responsibility of the prime Contractor to return such identification to the issuing agency in accordance with the terms set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Contracting Officer.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.204 [Reserved]
EX-10.15






Exhibit 10.15




CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.

SUMMARY OF FISCAL YEAR 2009

EXECUTIVE OFFICER BASE SALARIES



Our executive officers are scheduled to receive the following annual base salaries for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2009 in their current positions:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Name and Current Position	 	Base Salary
	David L. Martin

President, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief
Financial Officer and Director
	 	$	395,000	 
	Laurence L. Betterley

Chief Financial Officer
	 	$	250,000	 
	James E. Flaherty

Chief Administrative Officer
	 	$	233,000	 
	Robert J. Thatcher

Executive Vice President
	 	$	250,000	 
	Paul Koehn

Vice President of Manufacturing
	 	$	206,450	 
	Brian Doughty

Vice President of Commercial Operations
	 	$	225,000	 
	Paul Tyska

Vice President of Business Development
	 	$	200,000	 
	Scott Kraus

Vice President of Sales
	 	$	190,000	 






Other than Mr. Doughty, who was promoted from Vice President of Marketing to Vice President of
Commercial Operations on April 6, 2009, and Mr. Kraus, who was promoted from Senior Sales Director
to Vice President of Sales on April 6, 2009, these individuals became executive officers on
February 25, 2009 in connection with the closing of the merger with Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., a
Minnesota corporation (“CSI-MN”). These base salaries reflect the same base salaries paid to these
individuals as executive officers of CSI-MN.
(March 26, 1970)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Bernard E. Moore, Appellant, v. Daniel J. McMann, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

— Appeal dismissed, without costs, on the ground that relator has been released on parole (see *People ex rel. Wilder*v. *Marhley,*26 N Y 2d 648). Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 5:98cr30-SPM/AK

TOD STEVEN FAUGHT,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER DENYING RULE 60 MOTION

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant Tod Steven Faught’s 

Motion for Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60 (d). Doc. 317. Through this

motion, Defendant seeks to challenge is criminal judgment.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 does not apply to criminal cases. 

United States v. Potts, No. 07-14599, 2008 WL 4898438 (11th Cir. Nov. 14,

2008). The Court lacks jurisdiction under Rule 60 to grant Defendant relief from

the judgment entered in his criminal case. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s motion (doc. 317) is

denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of January, 2009.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 5:98-cr-00030-SPM-AK Document 318 Filed 01/07/09 Page 1 of 2
Case 5:98-cr-00030-SPM-AK Document 318 Filed 01/07/09 Page 2 of 2
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40616

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EMMETT RAY DONIHOO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(4:01-CR-44-20)

- - - - - - - - - -

November 21, 2002

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Emmett Ray Donihoo appeals the district

court’s application of U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) to increase his

offense level for possession of a weapon during and in connection

with the drug conspiracy for which he was convicted. He argues

that possession of a firearm by George Ruff, a coconspirator, was

not foreseeable to him, thus application of § 2D1.1(b)(1) was

error. 
At sentencing, Sergeant Investigator Donald Fleming of the

Texas Department of Public Safety Narcotics testified that during

surveillance of the methamphetamine “cook” site, he observed Ruff

walking around carrying a sawed-off shotgun in close proximity to

Donihoo and the other participants in the cook. It can fairly be

inferred from Donihoo’s proximity to Ruff while Ruff carried the

sawed-off shotgun that Donihoo was aware of the existence of the

shotgun as well as its use during the cook, i.e., in connection

with the conspiracy. Also, Donihoo’s admission to the probation

officer that he believed Ruff was a “rough type” who had guns made

Ruff’s carrying of a weapon during the “cook” foreseeable, as did

the nature of the activity of “cooking” methamphetamine. See

United States v. Martinez, 808 F.2d 1050, 1057 (5th Cir. 1987).

The court’s finding that Donihoo’s subsequent retraction of his

admission was not credible was not clearly erroneous in light of

the other evidence presented at sentencing and in the presentence

report. See United States v. Garza, 118 F.3d 278, 285 (5th Cir.

1997). 

The district court did not clearly err in applying

§ 2D1.1(b)(1) to increase Donihoo’s sentence. See id.

AFFIRMED.

H:\OPINIONS\02-\02-40616 scr.wpd

4/29/04 10:14 am
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 29, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 007 90

- CR

George Henry Walker, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction signed by the trial court. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay cost s, no adjudication of costs is

made.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00476

- CR

Michael Joseph Percy, J r.

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 432nd District Court

o f Tarrant County (1162121D )

November 7, 2013

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM