alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JAMES RUSSELL JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-252-TKW/MJF

OFFICER YOUNG,

Defendant.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Second Report 

and Recommendation (Doc. 30). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration 

of the Second Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with 

the magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed due to 

Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Second Report and Recommendation is adopted 

and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of August, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00252-TKW-MAF Document 31 Filed 08/09/21 Page 1 of 1
#### § 58.651 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 5:03cr43/MCR

THOMAS MITCHELL BARFIELD, JR.

 /

ORDER REDUCING SENTENCE

Before the Court is the Government’s Rule 35 motion (doc. 29) advising that

a reduction in Defendant’s sentence may be warranted by his cooperation and

substantial assistance since his sentencing. The Court finds that a reduction is

proper to reward his assistance to the Government in the investigation and

prosecution of others.

Defendant’s sentence of confinement as to Count I is, therefore, reduced to

42 months. In all other respects, the original sentence imposed in the Judgment and

Commitment Order filed March 19, 2004, shall remain unchanged.

ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2005.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:03-cr-00043-MCR Document 30 Filed 12/15/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Video Display Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended May 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald D. Ordway, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|/s/RONALD D. ORDWAYRonald D. Ordway
Chief Executive Officer
July 15, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Video Display Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended May 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carol D. Franklin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|/s/CAROL D. FRANKLINCarol D. Franklin
Chief Financial Officer
July 15, 2003 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Video Display Corporation and will be retained by Video Display Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

22

---

QuickLinks
|   | 1. |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    |
|--------|----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                  | India Globalization Capital, Inc. |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
| Date: August 12, 2009 | By:                               | /s/ John B. Selvaraj                                                                |   |
|                  |                              | John B. Selvaraj                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|                  |                              | Treasurer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ravinder Gupta, Also Known as Ravi, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, and new trial granted. Memorandum: Defendant’s confession obtained by police the day following his indictment should have been suppressed. Defendant’s "indelible” constitutional right to counsel had attached (see *People v Cullen,*50 NY2d 168; *People v Samuels,*49 NY2d 218) and the waiver of his *Miranda*rights *(Miranda v Arizona,*384 US -436) in the absence of counsel was, therefore, ineffective. There is no merit to defendant’s contention that he was twice placed in jeopardy for the same charges because the trial court in his first trial had declared a mistrial due to the illness of a juror. Defendant’s counsel refused to consent to the continuation of the trial with a substituted alternate juror and affirmatively declared on the record that a mistrial should be granted (see *People v Singletary,*54 AD2d 767; *Matter of Napoli v Supreme Ct. of State of N. Y.,*40 AD2d 159, affd 33 NY2d 980, cert den 417 US 947). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court—criminal sale of controlled substance, second degree, and another charge.) Present-—Simons, J. P.; Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
51.101 Policy.

(a) If it is in the Government’s interest, and if supplies or services required in the performance of a

Government contract are available from Government supply sources, contracting officers may

authorize contractors to use these sources in performing-

(1) Government cost-reimbursement contracts;

(2) Other types of negotiated contracts when the agency determines that a substantial dollar portion

of the contractor’s contracts are of a Government cost-reimbursement nature; or

(3) A contract under 41 U.S.C.chapter 85, Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or

Severely Disabled, if-

(i) The nonprofit agency requesting use of the supplies and services is providing a commodity or

service to the Federal Government; and

(ii) The supplies or services received are directly used in making or providing a commodity or

service, approved by the Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled,

to the Federal Government (see subpart 8.7).

(b) Contractors with fixed-price Government contracts that require protection of security classified

information may acquire security equipment through GSA sources (see 41 CFR 101-26.507).

(c) Contracting officers shall authorize contractors purchasing supply items for Government use that

are available from the Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled (see

subpart 8.7) to purchase such items from the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), the General Services

Administration (GSA), and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) if they are available from these

agencies through their distribution facilities. Mandatory supplies that are not available from

DLA/GSA/VA shall be ordered through the appropriate central nonprofit agency (see 52.208-9(c)).

Parent topic: Subpart 51.1 - Contractor Use of Government Supply Sources
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**U.S. Bank Trust National Association**

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association (the “Trustee”), as Trustee in respect of the STRATSSM Trust for News Corporation Securities, Series 2006-4 (the “Trust”), does hereby certify that:

| 1. | The Bank is Trustee under the Trust Agreement. |
|----|------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Trust Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trust. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | A review of the Trustee’s activities during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2008 and of its performance under the Trust Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout such twelve-month period. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 11th day of             March 2009.

 

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    |  /s/ Janet P. O'Hara                                    |
| Name:  |    Janet P. O’Hara                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| Title: |    Assistant Vice President                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
exv10w23









Exhibit 10.23



[ * ] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has
been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule
24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.









February 13, 2009




[*]

Endwave Corporation

130 Baytech Drive

San Jose, CA 95134




Dear [*],



This letter amendment modifies the Amended Supply Agreement between Northrop Grumman Space and
Mission Systems Corporation and Endwave Corporation, dated May 12th, 2008, as amended December 22,
2008, by extending the term of contract, as stated in Article 3 of said contract, until July 31,
2009. The Parties agree that Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp. Is under no obligation
to further extend said Amended Supply Agreement beyond July 31, 2009 or to continue to supply
Endwave any products beyond the term, as herein amended, in section 3 of such Amended Supply
Agreement, unless both parties agree in writing otherwise, All other provisions of said contract
remain in full force and effect.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/ [*]
 	 	 
	 	[*] 	 	 
	 	Microelectronic Products & Services

Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp. 	 	 



Dated: 2/13/09



ACCEPTED AND AGREED on 13th of February 2009.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:  	      /s/ [*]
 	 	 
	 	[*] 	 	 
	 	Endwave Corporation
#### KAVANAGH, Respondent, v. NEW YORK & N. J. ICE LINES, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by Francis H. Kavanagh, a creditor, against the New York & New Jersey Ice Lines.

PER CtTRIAM.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs.

HOOKER, 3., dissents.
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv6013-LC-HTC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROLAND CARLY SAINTLOT,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv6013-LC-HTC

LIEUTENANT NEEL, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on June 10, 2021 

(ECF No. 13). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 13) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious for 

Plaintiff’s abuse of the judicial process.

Case 3:20-cv-06013-LC-HTC Document 14 Filed 07/20/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv6013-LC-HTC

3. The clerk of court is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of July, 2021.

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier 

Case 3:20-cv-06013-LC-HTC Document 14 Filed 07/20/21 Page 2 of 2
FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1

3:97cr49LAC - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. ENRIQUE CHAVEZ-GALVAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs

ENRIQUE CHAVEZ-GALVAN

Case No.3:97cr49LAC

ORDER

Your document, AFFIDAVIT OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE, was referred to the

undersigned with the following deficiencies:

The document does not have a Certificate of Service as required by Rule

5(b) and (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, showing proper

service.

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:

The document shall be returned without filing.

DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of September, 2006.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:97-cr-00049-LC Document 162 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 1
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION 

RHONDA FLEMING, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 

Civil Case Number: 

4:20-CV-00545-WS-MJF 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.’S RESPONSE 

TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER AND NUNC PRO TUNC 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO ECF NO. 86 

Defendants United States of America and Warden Erica Strong (together, 

“Defendants”) respond to this Court’s Show Cause Order at ECF No. 94 as 

follows: 

1. Defendants mistakenly assumed that the Court’s intervening Report 

and Recommendation [ECF No. 91], in conjunction with Plaintiff’s intervening 

filings demonstrating access to the courts [ECF Nos. 87, 89, 90 and 92], and 

transfer away from FCI-TLH and out of the custody of Warden Strong [ECF Nos. 

91 and 93], mooted Plaintiff’s Request for Emergency Relief [ECF Nos. 82 and 

83] and any response required thereto. Defendants sincerely apologize to the 

Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 95 Filed 05/23/22 Page 1 of 3
2 

Court, and to Plaintiff, for this error and any delay it may cause in resolution of 

these issues. 

2. Accordingly, Defendants request a nunc pro tunc extension of this 

Court’s Order at ECF No. 86, to permit Defendants to respond in opposition to 

Plaintiff’s Emergency Motions [ECF Nos. 82 and 84] up to and including May 

27, 2022. Defendants note that May 27, 2022, is the current deadline for 

Defendants to respond to this Court’s Show Cause Order. 

3. This brief extension of time will not impact any other deadlines, 

including this Court’s Order at ECF No. 88, regarding Defendants’ supplemental 

briefing for the Motion to Dismiss. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 JASON R. COODY 

 United States Attorney 

 

 /s/ Marie A. Moyle 

MARIE A. MOYLE, ESQ. 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Florida Bar No. 1003498 

Email: marie.moyle@usdoj.gov 

111 N. Adams Street, 4th Floor 

Tallahassee, FL 32301 

Telephone: 85-942-8430 

Fax: 850-942-8466 

 Counsel for United States of America 

Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 95 Filed 05/23/22 Page 2 of 3
3 

LOCAL RULE 5.1(F) CERTIFICATION 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been 

furnished via certified first-class mail, this 23rd day of May, 2022, to: 

RHONDA FLEMING 

20446-009 

FEDERAL TRANSFER CENTER 

PO BOX 898801 

OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73189 

 

/s/ Marie A. Moyle 

 Marie A. Moyle 

 Assistant U.S. Attorney 

Counsel for United States of America 

Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 95 Filed 05/23/22 Page 3 of 3
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN THE MATTER OF IN RE 

SKANSKA USA CIVIL 

SOUTHEAST INC. AND 

SKANSKA USA, INC. AS 

OWNERS OF THE BARGE KS 

5531 PRAYING FOR 

EXONERATION FROM OR 

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

ADMIRALTY RULE 9(H) 

 § 

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 

3:20-CV-05980-LC/HTC

DISCOVERY ORDER No. 7 

Re: PRIVILEGED MATERIALS 

This matter is before the Court on the Court’s in camera inspection of 99 

documents withheld by Skanska from discovery based on the work product doctrine 

or the attorney-client privilege. In Discovery Order No. 4 (ECF Doc. 1212), the 

Court discussed at length the contours of the work product doctrine and, therefore, 

will not repeat that discussion here. 

 For the attorney-client privilege to apply, the following elements must be met: 

“(1) Where legal advice of any kind is sought (2) from a professional legal advisor in 

his capacity as such, (3) the communications relating to that purpose, (4) made in 

confidence (5) by the client, (6) are at his instance permanently protected (7) from 

disclosure by himself or by the legal advisor, (8) except the protection may be 

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1242 Filed 08/10/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2 

Case No. 3:20-cv-05980-LC/HTC 

waived.” Universal City Dev. Partners, Ltd. v. Ride & Show Eng'g, Inc., 230 F.R.D. 

688, 690 (M.D. Fla. 2005). Like the work product doctrine, the party asserting the 

privilege has the burden of proving the existence of the privilege. See United States 

v. Schaltenbrand, 930 F.2d 1554, 1562 (11th Cir.1991). 

 Having reviewed each document, the Court finds that the documents are 

privileged and thus properly withheld. Specifically, the documents reviewed by the 

Court consists of communications among inside or outside counsel and Skanska 

employees regarding the subject of this litigation, the claims asserted against 

Skanska, or insurance coverage for the claims. The Court finds that those documents 

were made in confidence, include the rendition of legal advice, and were drafted for 

the purpose of obtaining legal advice or in anticipation of litigation. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the documents reviewed in camera and 

provided to the Court on July 29, 2021 are protected by the attorney client or work 

product privileges and do not have to be disclosed. 

DONE and ORDERED this 10th day of August 2021. 

 /s/ Hope Thai Cannon 

 HOPE THAI CANNON 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1242 Filed 08/10/21 Page 2 of 2
| Subsidiary                      |   | Jurisdiction of  organization |
|---------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| BioFuel      Energy, LLC        |   | Delaware                      |
| BFE      Holdings, LLC          |   | Delaware                      |
| BFE      Operating Company, LLC |   | Delaware                      |
| Pioneer      Trail Energy, LLC  |   | Delaware                      |
| Buffalo      Lake Energy, LLC   |   | Delaware                      |
| Oregon      Trail Energy, LLC   |   | Delaware                      |
| Wagon      Wheel Energy, LLC    |   | Delaware                      |
| Gilman      Trail Energy, LLC   |   | Delaware                      |
47.303-8 F.a.s. vessel, port of shipment.

(a) Explanation of delivery term."F.a.s. vessel, port of shipment" means free of expense to the

Government delivered alongside the ocean vessel and within reach of its loading tackle at the

specified port of shipment.

(b) Contractor responsibilities. The contractor shall-

(1)

(i) Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or

(ii) In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment for ocean transportation in conformance

with carrier requirements to protect the goods and to ensure assessment of the lowest applicable

transportation charge;

(2)

(i) Deliver the shipment in good order and condition alongside the ocean vessel and within reach of

its loading tackle, at the point of delivery and on the date or within the period specified in the

contract; and

(ii) Pay and bear all applicable charges, including transportation costs, wharfage, handling, and

heavy lift charges, if necessary, up to this point;

(3) Provide a clean dock or ship’s receipt;

(4) Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before delivery of the

shipment to the point specified in the contract; and

(5) At the Government’s request and expense, assist in obtaining the documents required for-

(i) Exportation; or

(ii) Importation at destination.

(c) Contract clause. The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at

52.247-36, F.a.s. Vessel, Port of Shipment, when the delivery term is f.a.s. vessel, port of shipment.

Parent topic: 47.303 Standard delivery terms and contract clauses.