alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014232EN.01002401.xml

| 5.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 232/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 232/24

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 30 July 2014

appointing three Italian members and an Italian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2014/516/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the ItalianGovernment,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. On 20 June 2011, by Council Decision 2011/375/EU (3), Mr Alessandro COSIMI was appointed as member until 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. On 20 June 2011, by Council Decision 2011/375/EU (3), Mr Alessandro COSIMI was appointed as member until 25 January 2015.

| (2) | Three members' seats have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Alessandro COSIMI, Mr Vito SANTARSIERO and Mr Roberto PELLA. An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Francesco CHIUCCHIURLOTTO, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Three members' seats have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Alessandro COSIMI, Mr Vito SANTARSIERO and Mr Roberto PELLA. An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Francesco CHIUCCHIURLOTTO,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The followingare hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| (a) | as members:






  — | Mr Ignazio MARINO, Sindaco del Comune di Roma |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as members:

—

Mr Ignazio MARINO, Sindaco del Comune di Roma

| — | Ms Micaela FANELLI, Sindaco del Comune di Riccia (CB) |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Micaela FANELLI, Sindaco del Comune di Riccia (CB)

| — | Mr Roberto PELLA, Sindaco del Comune di Valdengo (BI) (change of mandate) |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Roberto PELLA, Sindaco del Comune di Valdengo (BI) (change of mandate)

and

| (b) | as alternate member:






  — | Mr Francesco CHIUCCHIURLOTTO, Assessore del Comune di Ascrea (RI) (change of mandate). |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate member:

—

Mr Francesco CHIUCCHIURLOTTO, Assessore del Comune di Ascrea (RI) (change of mandate).

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 30 July 2014.

For the Council

The President

S. GOZI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 168, 28.6.2011, p. 10.

3

---
[875 NE2d 24, 843 NYS2d 532]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Manuel Rivera, Also Known as Angel Rivera, Appellant.

Decided September 11, 2007

*905APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Center for Appellate Litigation,*New York City *(Robert S. Dean*of counsel), for appellant.

*Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney,*New York City *(Frank Glaser*and *Sylvia Wertheimer*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed.

The trial court did not err as a matter of law in denying defendant’s for-cause challenge to prospective juror R.R *(see People v Arnold,*96 NY2d 358, 362-363 [2001]; *People v Johnson,*94 NY2d 600, 610-614 [2000]). In addition, because the evidence supporting defendant’s guilt is overwhelming, any error in the People’s failure to provide him notice under CPL 710.30 (1) (b) of its intent to introduce the police officer’s identification testimony is harmless *(see generally People v Grant,*7 NY3d 421, 424 [2006]; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241-242 [1975]). Defendant’s constitutional challenge to his adjudication as a persistent violent felony offender *(see*Penal Law § 70.08) is not preserved for this Court’s review and his remaining contention lacks merit.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, in a memorandum.
§ 4280.50 Disbursement of Zero-Interest Loan funds. ( a ) For a REDL loan, Rural Development will disburse Zero-Interest Loan funds to the Intermediary in accordance with the terms of the executed loan agreement. All loan funds will be disbursed either as an advance to the Intermediary, in multiple advances, or as a reimbursement for eligible project costs, once the Intermediary has complied with Rural Development requirements.
( b ) The Intermediary must provide to the Ultimate Recipient all loan funds that the Intermediary receives from Rural Development within one year of receiving them. If the Intermediary does not re-lend Rural Development funds within one year, the loan funds, and all interest earned on the loan funds, must be returned to the Agency.
( c ) For a REDG loan, Rural Development will disburse Grant funds to the Intermediary in accordance with 2 CFR 200 as adopted by USDA in 2 CFR part 400 as applicable. Specifically, Rural Development will disburse the Grant funds in advance if the following requirements are met: ( 1 ) The Intermediary has established written procedures that will minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from Rural Development and their disbursement to the Ultimate Recipient;
( 2 ) The management system of the Intermediary meets the requirements of 2 CFR part 200 as adopted by USDA in 2 CFR part 400, as applicable;
( 3 ) All necessary supplemental funds for the Project have been obligated or committed to the Revolving Loan Fund; and
( 4 ) The requests for cash advances made by the Intermediary are limited to the minimum amounts needed and timed to be in accordance with the actual immediate cash needs of the Ultimate Recipient for carrying out the Project.
[72 FR 29843, May 30, 2007, as amended at 79 FR 76015, Dec. 19, 2014]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE NORTHERN

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

Pursuant to the Northern District of Florida Local Rules 11.1, I, Attorney 

Georgia A. Lawrence , hereby move this Court for an Order of admission to 

practice pro hac vice in the above styled cases currently pending, and in support 

thereof state as follows:

1. Movant is a resident of the State of Georgia and is not a resident of the state

of Florida.

2. Movant is admitted to practice law and is a member in good standing with the 

State Bar of Georgia including the Northern District of Georgia. A copy of a 

Certificate of Good Standing from the Northern District of Georgia for the Court’s 

review is attached hereto and made a part hereof.

TIMOTHY BAILEY

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT WILKIE, 

SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS,

Defendant.

Civil Action No.

1 :21-cv-01-MW-GRJ

Jury Trial 

Demand

Case 1:21-cv-00001-MW-GRJ Document 26 Filed 12/03/21 Page 1 of 5
3. Pursuant to Local Rule 11.1, Movant has reviewed the local rules of this district, 

successfully completed the online Attorney Admission Tutorial (Confirmation 

Number: FLND16383895575307) and completed the CM/ECF online tutorials.

4. Movant has paid the required $201.00 pro hac vice admission fee to the Clerk.

5. Movant has an upgraded PACER “NextGen” account.

6. Wherefore, Georgia A. Lawrence, respectfully requests that the Court enter an 

Order granting his motion to appear pro hac vice on behalf of the above-referenced

Plaintiffs. 

SOUTHWORTH, P.C.

____________________ 

Georgia Lawrence, Esq.

Georgia Bar No. 270123

Southworth P.C. 

1100 Peachtree Street NE, 

Suite 200 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Phone: (404) 585-8095 

Fax: (404) 393-4129 

georgia@southworthpc.com

Case 1:21-cv-00001-MW-GRJ Document 26 Filed 12/03/21 Page 2 of 5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE NORTHERN 

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney, certifies that the foregoing Motion for 

Admission Pro Hac Vice was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court using 

the CM/ECF system on December 3, 2021 and served electronically on all 

counsel of record

SOUTHWORTH, P.C.

____________________ 

Georgia Lawrence, Esq.

Georgia Bar No. 270123

Southworth P.C. 

1100 Peachtree Street NE, 

Suite 200 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

TIMOTHY BAILEY

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT WILKIE, 

SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS,

Defendant.

Civil Action No.

1 :21-cv-01-MW-GRJ 

Jury Trial 

Demand

Case 1:21-cv-00001-MW-GRJ Document 26 Filed 12/03/21 Page 3 of 5
Phone: (404) 585-8095 

Fax: (404) 393-4129 

georgia@southworthpc.com

Case 1:21-cv-00001-MW-GRJ Document 26 Filed 12/03/21 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:21-cv-00001-MW-GRJ Document 26 Filed 12/03/21 Page 5 of 5
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-30,408-17
IN RE DEREK M ITCHEL L BAILE Y, Relat or
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 94-0857-CR IN THE 25T H DISTRICT COURT F ROM G UADALUP E COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ o f m an damus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that on or about Dec ember 5, 2018, and J anuar y 9, 2019, he mailed applications for writs of habea s corpus to the Guada lupe County District Clerk’s Offic e. He c ontends that the district cler k returne d his applications without filing them. In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. R es p o ndent, the Guada lupe County District Clerk, shall state whe ther Relator mailed Article 11.07 applications on or about the above dates and, if so, whet h er Respondent filed his applications. This motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitt ed the appropr iate response . Her2

response shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: Fe bruar

y 27, 2019 Do not publish
#### In the Matter of Rose Maurice, Appellant, v Blanche Bernstein, et al., Respondents. In the Matter of Rose Maurice, Petitioner, v Barbara Blum, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on December 14, 1978, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, and determination of respondent Commissioner of the State of New York Department of Social Services dated April 26, 1978, unanimously confirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Fein, Markewich and Lupiano, JJ.
From: Haynes, Erin (haynesen) [mailto:haynesen@UCMAIL.UC.EDU] 

Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 3:05 PM

To: Chin.Conrad@epamail.epa.gov

Cc: Bollweg.George@epamail.epa.gov; Nash.Carlton@epamail.epa.gov; French.Chuck@epamail.epa.gov; 

Smith.Darcie@epamail.epa.gov; Guinnup.Dave@epamail.epa.gov; Mazur.Sarah@epamail.epa.gov; Beth 

Friedman; chin.conrad@epa.gov

Subject: RE: Marietta study updates

Hello Conrad,

I'm glad to help!

I can share with you our personal air sampling results in draft manuscript 

form. The paper is currently under review by Sci of Total Environ - we have 

responded to the minimal reviewer comments and are awaiting approval.

We conducted postural balance assessments on 93 children (56 from Marietta and 37 

from Cambridge). We have preliminary findings that I will plan to send you 

within 2 weeks.

There are other data in the pipeline that I will share as soon as it is ready.

Looking forward to talking with you in the near future.

Erin

-----Original Message-----

From: Chin.Conrad@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Chin.Conrad@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:38 PM

To: Haynes, Erin (haynesen)

Cc: Bollweg.George@epamail.epa.gov; Nash.Carlton@epamail.epa.gov; 

French.Chuck@epamail.epa.gov; Smith.Darcie@epamail.epa.gov; 

Guinnup.Dave@epamail.epa.gov; Mazur.Sarah@epamail.epa.gov; Beth Friedman; 

chin.conrad@epa.gov

Subject: Re: Marietta study updates

Dear Erin,

I am very interested to learn more about your research data, as you expected me 

to be. More importantly, some of my EPA colleagues who are involved in risk 

assessments would also be interested. Is it possible that you share your 

information by email(s), and we conduct a conference call after reviewing the 

information? The timing of your information is excellent. As you may know, we 

proposed a rule for the two existing manganese plants in November last year, and 

the comment period for the proposal is ending tomorrow. Your information would 

be very useful when we review the comments to the proposal.

Thanks in advance.

Conrad K. Chin
Mail Code D243-02

Metals and Minerals Group

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

919-541-1512 (voice)

919-541-3207 (fax)

From: "Haynes, Erin (haynesen)" <haynesen@UCMAIL.UC.EDU>

To: Conrad Chin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/30/2012 01:10 PM

Subject: Marietta study updates

Hello Conrad,

I recently learned of the EPA’s review of emission standards for Ferroalloy 

production.

As you know I have a long term research study in Marietta, Ohio focusing on Mn 

exposure from the ferromanganese refinery. We have preliminary data that I’d be 

glad to share with you. What would be the best mechanism for sharing these 

unpublished findings?

I’m hoping our research can be useful to you.

Erin

Erin N. Haynes, DrPH, MS

Assistant Professor

Clinical and Translational Research Program, Director Division of Epidemiology 

and Biostatistics Department of Environmental Health University of Cincinnati, 

College of Medicine

3223 Eden Ave, PO Box 670056

Cincinnati, OH 45267-0056

PH: 513-558-5427

FX: 513-558-4838
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 195 ) IV-E-69 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:57

PM Sheet 195of 242P. 2 

# i -tm \ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 

### SE P 2 2 I98 8 OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATKX *

MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : Phon e Conversatio n Wit h Mr . Scot t York o f NHTS A FROM : TO : Joh

n F . Anderson , Senio r Projec t Manage r Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1 '.yf^f^--m.

On Septembe r 12 , 198 8 I had a conversatio n wit h Mr . Scot t York o f NHTS Aconcerning th e NHTSAevaluatio n o f th e AP I onboar d tes t car . Mr . York describe d problem s whic h wer e encountere d wit h bot h fil l qualit yan d driveability . Fil l qualit ywa s affecte d b yth e occurrenc e o f prematur e shutoff s on severa l refueling-s . Driveabilit yproblem s occurre d o n som e occasion s fo r the perio d immediatel yfollowing the fillup . Mr . York indicate d tha t the result s o f th e NHTSAevaluatio n wer e bein g documented
- in a lette r t o AP I an d tha t a cop

yo f th

e lette r woul d b e sen t t o EPA .

• \0V--' ' ...-••; •

_
# 52.208-8           [Reserved]       

**Parent topic:**52.208 [Reserved]
#### Boyd v. The State.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Marshall.

Tried before the Hon. James A. Bilbro.

No counsel marked as appearing for appellant.

William C. Fitts, Attorney-General, for the State.

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for murder, and sentenced to be hanged. The record contains no bill of exceptions, and shows that no question of law has been reserved for review in this court. .The bill is, therefore, dismissed, leaving the judgment of the trial court to be enforced. The day of execution had passed before the case was decided in this court. Section 4674 of the Criminal Code of 1886, makes provision for the execution of the sentence of the law and the judgment of the court in such cases. The court’fixes the day for the execution of the sentence of death only in cases of the affirmance of the judgment of the lower court. — Cr. Code, of 1886, § 4522; *Howard v. State,*110 Ala. 23.

Appeal dismissed.

Opinion

Per Curiam..
# L_2014048EN.01000901.xml

| 19.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 48/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 48/9

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

of 20 November 2013

on the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund

(2014/95/EU)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (1), and in particular point 26 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund (2),

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund (the ‘Fund’) to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund (the ‘Fund’) to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.

| (2) | The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 contains the provisions whereby the Fund may be mobilised. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 contains the provisions whereby the Fund may be mobilised.

| (4) | Romania has submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning drought and forest fires. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Romania has submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning drought and forest fires.

| (5) | Germany, Austria and the Czech Republic have submitted applications to mobilise the Fund, concerning a flooding disaster. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Germany, Austria and the Czech Republic have submitted applications to mobilise the Fund, concerning a flooding disaster.

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 400 519 089 in commitment and payment appropriations.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Strasbourg, 20 November 2013.

For the European Parliament

The President

M. SCHULZ

For the Council

The President

V. LEŠKEVIČIUS

---

(1)  
  OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p. 3.

2

---
1

Date: August 13, 2010

Subject: Minutes of the August 12, 2010 Conference Call with Representative from Barrick

Gold Corporation

EPA Contract No. EP-D-06-118; EPA Work Assignment No. 4-06

RTI Project No. 0210426.004.006

From: Chuck French

OAQPS/SPPD/MMG (D243-02)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

To: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0239

I. Introduction

A conference call with a representative for Barrick Gold Corporation was held on 

August 12, 2010. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss testing and parametric monitoring 

for roasters. This memorandum summarizes the major topics discussed during the meeting.

II. Attendees

Kevin Lewis, Air Sciences Inc. 

Chuck French, U.S. EPA, OAQPS

Marvin Branscome, RTI International

Gabrielle Raymond, RTI International

III. Discussion

The major topics discussed during the meeting included important parameters to measure 

for calomel scrubbers, ways to establish parametric limits, and using Method 30B for monitoring.
Exhibit
      32.1





***CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***


***PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Sputnik Enterprises, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      David LaDuke


Name:  David
      LaDuke


Title:  President,
      Chief Executive Officer, and Treasurer








November
      18, 2008











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Sputnik Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Sputnik Enterprises, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





I-2
www.optiononemortgage.com








Annual
      Compliance Certificate




I,
      Teji
      Singh, the undersigned, the duly authorized Chief Servicing Officer of Option
      One Mortgage Corporation (as "Servicer"), does hereby certify the following
      for the
      calendar year ending on December 31, 2006:




|1. | A
              review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar
              year (or portion
              thereof) and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement (asdefined
              in the cover letter) for such period has been made under my
              supervision.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To
              the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
              all of
              its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respectsthroughout
              such year (or applicable portion thereof), except as disclosed onAppendix
              A, attached.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









Certified
      By:








/s/
      Teji Singh


Name:  Teji
      Singh


Title:  Chief
      Servicing Officer - SVP


Date:  March
      15,
      2007


























6501
      Irvine Center Drive ° Irvine ° California ° 92618 ° (800) 704-0800
°














www.optiononemortgage.com









APPENDIX
      A




Criteria
      1122(d)(1)(iv)


Option
      One's fidelity bond insurance was less than FNMA requirements by approximately
      $5.4 million on average during the first six months of the year, and during
      such
      six month period reached up to $8.6 million less than the FNMA requirements.
      Upon discovery of the deficiency, Option
      One renewed the insurance policy on June 17, 2006 for coverage in excess of
      the
      FNMA requirements.





























6501
      Irvine Center Drive ° Irvine ° California ° 92618 ° (800) 704-0800°