alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Figure b

Page 1 of 8

FIGURE b

Photographs of Benthic Infaunal Invertebrate Samples Collected during the Spring 2010 Jacksonville Survey; Stations 

N01–N04 and N06–N09

JAX-Sp10-N01-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N01-INF-B JAX-Sp10-N01-INF-C

JAX-Sp10-N01-INF-A

JAX-Sp10-N01-INF-B JAX-Sp10-N01-INF-C
Figure b

Page 2 of 8

FIGURE b (continued)

Photographs of Benthic Infaunal Invertebrate Samples Collected during the Spring 2010 Jacksonville Survey; Stations 

N01–N04 and N06–N09

JAX-Sp10-N02-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N02-INF-B

JAX-Sp10-N02-INF-C

JAX-Sp10-N02-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N02-INF-B JAX-Sp10-N02-INF-C
Figure b

Page 3 of 8

FIGURE b (continued)

Photographs of Benthic Infaunal Invertebrate Samples Collected during the Spring 2010 Jacksonville Survey; Stations 

N01–N04 and N06–N09

JAX-Sp10-N03-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N03-INF-B JAX-Sp10-N03-INF-C

JAX-Sp10-N03-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N03-INF-B JAX-Sp10-N03-INF-C
Figure b

Page 4 of 8

FIGURE b (continued)

Photographs of Benthic Infaunal Invertebrate Samples Collected during the Spring 2010 Jacksonville Survey; Stations 

N01–N04 and N06–N09

(Photo not taken)

JAX-Sp10-N04-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N04-INF-B JAX-Sp10-N04-INF-C

JAX-Sp10-N04-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N04-INF-B JAX-Sp10-N04-INF-C
Figure b

Page 5 of 8

FIGURE b (continued)

Photographs of Benthic Infaunal Invertebrate Samples Collected during the Spring 2010 Jacksonville Survey; Stations 

N01–N04 and N06–N09

JAX-Sp10-N06-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N06-INF-B JAX-Sp10-N06-INF-C

JAX-Sp10-N06-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N06-INF-B JAX-Sp10-N06-INF-C
Figure b

Page 6 of 8

FIGURE b (continued)

Photographs of Benthic Infaunal Invertebrate Samples Collected during the Spring 2010 Jacksonville Survey; Stations 

N01–N04 and N06–N09

JAX-Sp10-N07-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N07-INF-B JAX-Sp10-N07-INF-C

JAX-Sp10-N07-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N07-INF-B JAX-Sp10-N07-INF-C
Figure b

Page 7 of 8

FIGURE b (continued)

Photographs of Benthic Infaunal Invertebrate Samples Collected during the Spring 2010 Jacksonville Survey; Stations 

N01–N04 and N06–N09

JAX-Sp10-N08-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N08-INF-B

JAX-Sp10-N08-INF-C

JAX-Sp10-N08-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N08-INF-B JAX-Sp10-N08-INF-C
Figure b

Page 8 of 8

FIGURE b (continued)

Photographs of Benthic Infaunal Invertebrate Samples Collected during the Spring 2010 Jacksonville Survey; Stations 

N01–N04 and N06–N09

JAX-Sp10-N09-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N09-INF-B JAX-Sp10-N09-INF-C

JAX-Sp10-N09-INF-A JAX-Sp10-N09-INF-B JAX-Sp10-N09-INF-C
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**








VIA:
      EMAIL





Credit
      Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.


Eleven
      Madison Avenue


New
      York,
      New York 10010





Re:
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of September 1,
      2006
      among Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor,
      Keycorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc., as Master Servicer No. 1, NCB and
      FSB, as Master Servicer No. 2, LNR Partners, Inc., as Special Servicer No.
      1,
      National Consumer Cooperative Bank, as Special Servicer No. 2, Wells Fargo
      Bank,
      N.A., as Trustee, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as Certificate
      Administrator and Paying Agent (the “Certificate Administrator”), relating to
      Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Credit Suisse Commercial Mortgage
      Trust Series 2006-C4.




I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Certificate Administrator hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding
      calendar year and of the performance of the Certificate Administrator under
      the
      Agreement has been made under my supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator
      has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
      throughout such year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007








LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
# L_2013346EN.01004901.xml

| 20.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 346/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 346/49

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1377/2013

of 19 December 2013

on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of December 2013 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 for poultrymeat

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 of 26 November 2007 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 as regards opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat (3), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of December 2013 for the subperiod from 1 January to 31 March 2014 relate, for some quotas, to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import licences may be issued should therefore be determined by establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications have been lodged for the subperiod from 1 January to 31 March 2014 under Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 shall be multiplied by the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 December 2013.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jerzy PLEWA

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 47.

3

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Order No | Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.1.2014-31.3.2014
  (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 09.4410 | 0,250375 |
| 2 | 09.4411 | 0,253228 |
| 3 | 09.4412 | 0,267952 |
| 4 | 09.4420 | 0,26178 |
| 6 | 09.4422 | 0,262743 |

Group No

Order No

Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.1.2014-31.3.2014

(%)

1

09.4410

0,250375

2

09.4411

0,253228

3

09.4412

0,267952

4

09.4420

0,26178

6

09.4422

0,262743

---
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5



       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1992

<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1992

<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         6,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,901)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          151,438
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       177,833
<OTHER-SE>                                     (329,271)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (151,438)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0)
        


</TABLE>
52.236-26 Preconstruction Conference.

As prescribed in 36.522 , insert the following clause:

Preconstruction Conference (Feb 1995)

If the Contracting Officer decides to conduct a preconstruction conference, the successful offeror

will be notified and will be required to attend. The Contracting Officer’s notification will include

specific details regarding the date, time, and location of the conference, any need for attendance by

subcontractors, and information regarding the items to be discussed.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.236 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1726]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 138 Under Alternative Site 
Framework, Columbus, OH, Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) in 
December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09) 
as an option for the establishment or reorganization of general-purpose 
zones;
    Whereas, Columbus Regional Airport Authority, grantee of Foreign-
Trade Zone 138, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket 46-
2010, filed 7/21/2010, amended 10/6/2010) for authority to reorganize 
under the ASF with a service area of Champaign, Clark, Coshocton, 
Crawford, Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Hocking, Knox, Licking, Logan, 
Madison, Marion, Morrow, Muskingum, Perry, Pickaway, Pike, Ross, Union, 
Vinton and Wyandot Counties, as well as portions of Guernsey, Athens 
and Highland Counties, Ohio, adjacent to the Columbus Customs and 
Border Protection port of entry, FTZ 138's existing Sites 1, 2, 4, 5, 
6, and 15 would be categorized as magnet sites, and FTZ 138's existing 
Sites 13, 14, 16, 17, and 18 would be categorized as usage-driven 
sites;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (75 FR 45096-45097, 8/2/2010) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 138 under the alternative site 
framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28, to the Board's standard 2,000-
acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project, to 
a five-year ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would terminate 
authority for Sites 2, 4, 5, 6, and 15, on November 30, 2015 and to a 
three-year ASF sunset provision for usage-driven sites that would 
terminate authority for Sites 13, 14, 16, 17, and 18 if no foreign-
status merchandise is admitted for a bona fide customs purpose by 
November 30, 2013.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of November 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30665 Filed 12-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
§ 400.455 Governmentwide debarment and suspension (procurement). ( a ) For all transactions undertaken pursuant to the Federal Acquisition Regulations, FCIC will proceed under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4 or 48 CFR part 409 when taking action to suspend or debar persons involved in such transactions, except that the authority to suspend or debar under these provisions will be reserved to the Manager of FCIC, or the Manager's designee.
( b ) Any person suspended or debarred under the provisions of 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4 or 48 CFR part 409 will not be eligible to contract with FCIC or the Risk Management Agency and will not be eligible to participate in or receive any benefit from any program under the Act during the period of ineligibility. This includes, but is not limited to, being employed by or contracting with any approved insurance provider that sells, services, or adjusts policies offered under the authority of the Act. FCIC may waive this provision if it is satisfied that the person who employs the suspended or debarred person has taken sufficient action to ensure that the suspended or debarred person will not be involved, in any way, with FCIC or receive any benefit from any program under the Act.
[73 FR 76890, Dec. 18, 2008]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6


                  Amendment No. 1, dated as of August 1, 2001, by and between
The Berkshire Bank, a New York banking corporation ("Employer"), and Moses
Krausz ("Employee"), to the Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1999, between Employer
and Employee (the "Employment Agreement").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

                  WHEREAS, Employer and Employee entered into the Employment
Agreement; and

                  WHEREAS, Employer and Employee wish the amend the terms of the
Employment Agreement with respect to the term thereof.

                  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants herein
contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

                  1. Paragraph 3 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to
read in its entirety as follows:

                  "3. Term of Employment. The employment by Employer of Employee
                  pursuant hereto shall commence as of the date hereof and,
                  subject to the provisions of paragraph 4 hereof, shall
                  terminate on April 30, 2006; provided, however, that
                  Employee's employment hereunder shall be automatically renewed
                  for up to three additional periods of one year each unless
                  Employee or Employer notifies the other, not less than 60 days
                  nor more than 90 days prior to the expiration of Employee's
                  then current employment period, that he or it elects not to
                  extend Employee's employment hereunder beyond the expiration
                  date of the then current employment period."

                  2. The increases in Employee's base salary set forth in
Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement shall be applicable for the periods of
employment May 1, 2003 to April 30, 2004 and May 1, 2004 to April 30, 2005,
respectively, and, if the Employee's employment is extended beyond April 30,
2006 as set forth in the amended Paragraph 3, for each year thereafter.

                  3. Except as otherwise amended hereby, the Employment
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect unamended from and after the
date hereof.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 has been executed and
delivered by the parties hereto as of the date first above written.

                                        THE BERKSHIRE BANK


                                        By: /s/ Moses Marx
                                            --------------------------
                                                 Chairman of the Board



                                            /s/ Moses Krausz
                                            --------------------------
                                                 MOSES KRAUSZ

                                       29
## SERVED: JANUARY 31, 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF AERO MICRONESIA FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil P.enalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0468
IN THE MATTER OF AERO MICRONESIA FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0469
ORDERON VENUE Aero Micronesia, Respondent has filed a Motion for Reconsideration ofVenue. The Federal Aviation Administration, Complainanthas filed a Reply. WHEREFORE, the Motion for Reconsideration ofVenuebe and is hereby DENIED. Venue shall remain Honolulu, Hawaii.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment- Service List

1

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL 

### & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

.


### Michael 

### R. Quinn, President Aero Micronesia, Inc., dba Pacific Airlines

### Respondent 156 Diablo Road, Suite 203 Danville, CA94526 TEL: 925-362-4430 FAX: 925-362-4432 DonBobertz, 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofRegional Counsel Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7.4 Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-3454 FAJ(: 310-725-6816 ONECOP.Y FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0468 

### & FAA-2012-0469 (Civil Penalty Action)

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings; M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: ·202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U:S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### 2
#### HITCHCOCK v. BROOKS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

June 1, 1906.)

Action by Stephen K. Hitchcock against James J. Brooks.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs.
#### § 65.115 Born.

*Born* in the case of chicken means hatched from the egg.
98-1397.

#### State ex rel. Diagnostic & Behavioral Health Serv., Inc. v. Felton.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On August 21, 1998, relator filed a motion for extension of time to respond to respondents’ motion to dismiss and motion to compel. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.'R. XIV(3XB) prohibits requests for extensions of time to file responses to motions,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that relator’s motion for extension of time be, and hereby is, stricken.
Amendment to Employment Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Employment Agreement is by and between Andrew
Pascal (“Employee”) and Wynn Las Vegas, LLC (“Employer”). 
 WHEREAS, Employee and Employer have entered in to that
certain Employment Agreement dated as of August 31, 2005, as amended (the “Employment Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, due to the
ongoing negative economic climate, Employee and Employer desire to amend the Employment Agreement in order to assist Employer to maintain business stability thereby preserving Employee’s employment. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Amendment to Base Salary. Effective February 16, 2009, the term “Base Salary” shall be mean $850,000 per annum. 

  

	 	2.	Other Provisions of Agreement. The parties acknowledge that the Employment Agreement is being modified only as stated herein, and agree that nothing else in the Employment
Agreement shall be affected by this Amendment. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed as of the date below. 
  

									
	WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC	 		 	EMPLOYEE
			
	 /s/ David Sisk
  
	 		 	 /s/ Andrew Pascal
  

		 		 		 	Andrew Pascal
				
	By:	 	David Sisk	 		 	
					
	Its:	 	CFO	 		 	 Date: 
	 	February 16, 2009
#### § 63.505 OMB control number.

The control number assigned to the information collection requirements of this part by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, is OMB control number 0505-new.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Hassan Ford, Jr., :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 583 C.D. 2019

: Pennsylvania Board of Probation and :

Parole, :

Respondent :

CORRECTING ORDER

AND NOW, this 19 th day of February, 2020, in the opinion in the

above

- captioned matter, filed on February 18, 2020, page 1, paragraph 2, line 4

, is

corrected to read as follows:

“He was sentenced to incarceration for a term of one

year, ...”

_____________________________________

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT, President Judge
#### § 70.8 Other applicable regulations.

Compliance with the regulations in this part shall not excuse failure to comply with any other Federal, or any State, or municipal applicable laws or regulations.

[71 FR 42012, July 24, 2006]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Howard Butt, Respondent, v Landsman Packing Co., et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 22, 1978, which found that the claimant had a causally related disability after January 21, 1977. The primary issue is whether the record contains substantial evidence of physical impairment causally related to an initial industrial accident which occurred on July 3, 1973 when the claimant inhaled chlorine gas, concededly causing an acute bronchitis. The board, after summarizing the medical testimony, including a medical examiner’s conclusion of a permanent partial disability, and other findings of "moderate ventilatory impairment”, found: "Upon review, Board Panel finds based on credible medical evidence, including reports of Dr. J. Gold that claimant had a causally related disability after 1/21/77”. The record contains substantial evidence supporting the board’s decision. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Sweeney, J. P., Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.