Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices 73131 

The Cushing Refinery Sites, Cushing, 

OK 

The Corpus Christi Petrol Terminal Site, 

CC, TX 

The former wood treating facility, 

Texarkana, TX 

The former wood treating facility, 

Kansas City, MO 

The former wood treating facility, 

Springfield, MO 

The former wood treating facility, Rome, 

NY 

The former wood treating facility, 

Avoca, PA 

The Riley Pass Mine Site, Harding 

County, SD 

The former wood treating facility, 

Indianapolis, IN more than 50 former 

uranium mines and mills, including 

Shiprock, Churchrock, and Ambrosia 

Lake on and in the vicinity of Navajo 

Nation, NM, AZ 

The White King/Lucky Lass mine site, 

Lakeview, OR 

The Toledo Tie Site, Toledo, OH 

The Welsbach Gas and Mantle Site, 

Camden, NJ 

The former Federal Creosote facility, 

Manville, NJ 

The former Moss American Site, 

Milwaukee, WI more than 1800 

current and former service stations in 

twenty-four states 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the Consent Decree and 

Settlement Agreement. Comments 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and either 

e-mailed to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. 

Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611, and 

should refer to In re Tronox, 

Incorporated et al., D.J. Ref. 90–11–3– 

09688. Commenters may request an 

opportunity for a public meeting in the 

affected area, in accordance with section 

7003(d) of RCRA,42 U.S.C. 6973(d). 

The Consent Decree and Settlement 

Agreement may be examined at the 

Office of the United States Attorney, 86 

Chambers Street—3rd Floor, New York, 

New York 10007. During the public 

comment period, the Consent Decree 

and Settlement Agreement may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site: http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree and Settlement 

Agreement may also be obtained by mail 

from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. 

Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by 

faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please enclose a check 

in the amount of $53.25 (213 pages, 

exclusive of signature pages and 

attachments; 25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) or $123.75 (495 

pages, including signatures and 

attachments) payable to the U.S. 

Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, forward 

a check in that amount to the Consent 

Decree Library at the stated address. 

Maureen M. Katz, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30027 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–CW–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–70,599] 

Innovion Corporation, Gresham, OR; 

Notice of Negative Determination on 

Reconsideration 

On March 31, 2010, the Department of 

Labor issued an Affirmative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration for the workers and 

former workers of Innovion Corporation, 

Gresham, Oregon (subject firm). The 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register on April 19, 2010 (75 FR 

20382). The workers supply ion 

implantation services for firms in the 

semiconductor industry. 

The initial investigation resulted in a 

negative determination based on the 

finding that there was no shift to/ 

acquisition from a foreign country by 

the workers’ firm of services like or 

directly competitive with the ion 

implantation services supplied by the 

subject firm and no increased import by 

either the subject firm or its major 

declining customers of services like or 

directly competitive with the ion 

implantation services supplied by the 

subject firm [Section 222(a)]. Further, 

the workers are not eligible to apply for 

Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) as 

adversely affected secondary workers 

[Section 222(c)] or workers of a firm 

identified by the International Trade 

Commission as a member of a domestic 

industry injured under a provision of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 [Section 222(f)]. 

The initial investigation concluded 

that worker separations were 

attributable to a customer’s decision to 

perform ion implantation services inhouse instead of using the subject firm. 

During the reconsideration 

investigation, the Department sought 

clarification from the subject firm’s 

headquarters and conducted an 

expanded customer survey of the 

subject firm’s major declining 

customers, including those identified in 

the request for reconsideration. 

Information provided during the 

reconsideration investigation confirmed 

no shift to/acquisition from another 

country by the subject firm in the 

supply of ion implantation services, and 

no increased imports of ion 

implantation services, or like or directly 

competitive services, by the subject firm 

during the relevant period. 

The customer survey conducted 

during the reconsideration investigation 

showed that, during the relevant time 

period, the three largest declining 

customers of the subject firm did not 

import services like or directly 

competitive with the ion implantation 

services provided by the subject 

workers. 

Together, the surveyed customers 

accounted for 92 percent of subject firm 

sales in 2007, 89 percent of subject firm 

sales in 2008, and 84 percent of subject 

firm sales during the first four months 

of 2009. Those customers also 

accounted for 109 percent of the sales 

decline of the subject firm from 2007 to 

2008 and 97 percent of the subject firm’s 

sales decline during the first four 

months of 2009 as compared with the 

same period of 2009. 

The assertion that the subject firm 

should be certified as a result of the 

certification of customer LSI Logic 

(TA–W–55,958; certified on November 

3, 2003) was not investigated on 

reconsideration because a shift to a 

foreign country by a customer cannot be 

a basis of certification absent under 

Section 222(a), which requires that there 

has been a shift to a foreign country by 

the subject firm. Further, the 

certification of the Chandler, Arizona 

facility (TA–W–71,648) cannot be the 

basis of certification of workers of the 

Gresham, Oregon facility as adversely 

affected secondary workers because the 

certification of the Chandler, Arizona 

facility was based on the satisfaction of 

Section 222(c) and Section 222(c) 

requires that the primary firm be 

certified under Section 222(a). 

Conclusion 

After reconsideration, I affirm the 

original notice of negative 

determination of eligibility to apply for 

worker adjustment assistance for 

workers and former workers of Innovion 

Corporation, Gresham, Oregon. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

73132 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 15th day of 

November 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29822 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–70,910] 

Sypris Technologies, Sypris Solutions 

Division, Kenton, OH; Notice of 

Revised Determination on 

Reconsideration 

On October 7, 2010, the Department 

of Labor issued a Notice of Affirmative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration applicable to the 

request for administrative 

reconsideration filed by the United Steel 

Workers, Local 1–109, on behalf of 

workers and former workers of Sypris 

Technologies, Sypris Solutions 

Division, Kenton, Ohio (subject firm). 

The Department’s Notice was published 

in the Federal Register on October 25, 

2010 (75 FR 65514). 

The initial investigation resulted in a 

negative determination that was based 

on the findings that increased imports 

did not contribute importantly to 

worker separations at the subject firm 

and no shift in production to a foreign 

country occurred. 

During the reconsideration 

investigation, the Department 

conducted an expanded survey of the 

subject firm’s major declining customers 

to supplement the information gathered 

during the initial investigation. The 

survey revealed increased customer 

reliance on imported trailer axle beams 

and that the increased imports had 

contributed importantly to worker 

separations at the subject firm. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the additional 

facts obtained during the 

reconsideration investigation, I 

determine that workers of Sypris 

Technologies, Sypris Solutions 

Division, Kenton, Ohio, who are 

engaged in employment related to the 

production of trailer axle beams, meet 

the worker group certification criteria 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 

U.S.C. 2272(a). In accordance with 

Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, 

I make the following certification: 

‘‘All workers of Sypris Technologies, 

Sypris Solutions Division, Kenton, Ohio, 

who became totally or partially separated 

from employment on or after May 18, 2008, 

through two years from the date of this 

certification, and all workers in the group 

threatened with total or partial separation 

from employment on date of certification 

through two years from the date of 

certification, are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 

amended.’’ 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 16th day of 

November, 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29823 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE 

ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES 

Notice of Proposed Information 

Collection Requests: Public Demand 

for Museum and Library Services 

(PDMLS) Survey 

AGENCY: Institute of Museum and 

Library Services, The National 

Foundation for the Arts and the 

Humanities. 

ACTION: Notice, request for comments, 

collection of information. 

SUMMARY: The Institute of Museum and 

Library Services (IMLS), as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to 

provide the general public and Federal 

agencies with an opportunity to 

comment on proposed and/or 

continuing collections of information in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). 

This pre-clearance consultation program 

helps to ensure that requested data can 

be provided in the desired format, 

reporting burden (time and financial 

resources) is minimized, collection 

instruments are clearly understood, and 

the impact of collection requirements on 

respondents can be properly assessed. 

By this notice, IMLS is soliciting 

comments concerning a proposed 

survey to collect information to monitor 

the use, expectations of and satisfaction 

with cultural programs and services, 

most especially library and museum 

services. 

A copy of the proposed information 

collection request can be obtained by 

contacting the individual listed below 

in the ADDRESSES section of this notice. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted to the office listed in the 

addressee section below on or before 

January 22, 2011. 

IMLS is particularly interested in 

comments that help the agency to: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques, or other forms of 

information technology, e.g., permitting 

electronic submissions of responses. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: Carlos 

Manjarrez, Associate Deputy for 

Research and Statistics, Institute of 

Museum and Library Services, 1800 M 

St., NW., 9th Floor, Washington, DC 

20036. Mr. Manjarrez can be reached by 

Telephone: 202–653–4671, Fax: 202– 

653–4600, or by e-mail at 

cmanjarrez@imls.gov, or by teletype 

(TTY/TDD) for persons with hearing 

difficulty at 202–653–4614. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

The Institute of Museum and Library 

Services is the primary source of 

Federal support for the Nation’s 123,000 

libraries and 17,500 museums. The 

Institute’s mission is to create strong 

libraries and museums that connect 

people to information and ideas. The 

Institute works at the national level and 

in coordination with State and local 

organizations to sustain heritage, 

culture, and knowledge; enhance 

learning and innovation; and support 

professional development. IMLS is 

responsible for identifying national 

needs for, and trends of, museum and 

library services funded by IMLS; 

reporting on the impact and 

effectiveness of programs conducted 

with funds made available by IMLS in 

addressing such needs; and identifying, 

and disseminating information on, the 

best practices of such programs. (20 

U.S.C. Chapter 72, 20 U.S.C. 9108). 

II. Current Actions 

Libraries and museums help create 

vibrant, energized learning 

communities. Our achievement as 

individuals and our success as a 

democratic society depend on learning 

continually, adapting to change readily, 

and evaluating information critically. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES