alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
52.229-8 Taxes-Foreign Cost-Reimbursement Contracts.       As prescribed in 29.402-2(a), insert the following clause:          Taxes-Foreign Cost-Reimbursement Contracts (Mar 1990)                                       (a) 						            Any tax or duty from which the United States Government is exempt by agreement with the Government of ______ [*insert name of the foreign government*], or from which the Contractor or any subcontractor under this contract is exempt under the laws of ______ [*insert name of country*], shall not constitute an allowable cost under this contract.                                          (b) 						            If the Contractor or subcontractor under this contract obtains a foreign tax credit that reduces its Federal income tax liability under the United States Internal Revenue Code (Title26, U.S. Code) because of the payment of any tax or duty that was reimbursed under this contract, the amount of the reduction shall be paid or credited at the time of such offset to the Government of the United States as the Contracting Officer directs.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.229 [Reserved]
Subpart 34.1 - Testing, Qualification and Use of Industrial Resources Developed Under TitleIII, Defense Production Act    **Parent topic:** Part 34 - Major System Acquisition34.100 Scope of subpart.       This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for the testing, qualification, and use of industrial resources manufactured or developed with assistance provided under section 301, 302, or 303 of the Defense Production Act (50 U.S.C. App.2091-2093). TitleIII of the Defense Production Act authorizes various forms of Government assistance to encourage expansion of production capacity and supply of industrial resources essential to national defense.34.101 Definitions.       *Item of supply*, as used in this subpart, means any individual part, component, subassembly, assembly, or subsystem integral to a major system, and other property which may be replaced during the service life of the system. The term includes spare parts and replenishment parts, but does not include packaging or labeling associated with shipment or identification of an "item."34.102 Policy.       It is the policy of the Government, as required by Section 126 of Public Law102-558, to pay for any testing and qualification required for the use or incorporation of the industrial resources manufactured or developed with assistance provided under TitleIII of the Defense Production Act of1950.34.103 Testing and qualification.       (a) 						            Contractors receiving requests from a TitleIII project contractor for testing and qualification of a TitleIII industrial resource shall refer such requests to the contracting officer. The contracting officer shall evaluate the request in accordance with agency procedures to determine whether: (1) the TitleIII industrial resource is being or potentially may be used in the development or manufacture of a major system or item of supply; and (2) for major systems in production, remaining quantities to be acquired are sufficient to justify incurring the cost of testing and qualification. In evaluating this request, the contracting officer shall consult with the Defense Production Act Office, TitleIII Program, located at:                Wright Patterson Air Force Base OH 45433-7739.                                          (b) 						            If the determination at 34.103(a) is affirmative, the contracting	officer shall modify the contract to require the contractor to test the	TitleIII industrial resource for qualification.                                          (c) 						            The Defense Production Act Office, TitleIII Program, shall provide to the contractor the industrial resource produced by the TitleIII project contractor in sufficient amounts to meet testing needs.34.104 Contract clause.       Insert the clause at 52.234-1, Industrial Resources Developed under TitleIII, Defense Production Act, in all contracts for major systems and items of supply.
(May 19, 1969)

#### Anthony E. Albanese et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Town of Harrison et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 10, 1968, affirmed, without costs, on at Special Term by Mr. Justice Dillon. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
52.223-21 Foams.

As prescribed in 23.804(a)(4), insert the following clause:

Foams (Jun 2016)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause–

Global warming potential means how much a given mass of a chemical contributes to global

warming over a given time period compared to the same mass of carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide’s

global warming potential is defined as 1.0.

High global warming potential hydrofluorocarbons means any hydrofluorocarbons in a particular

end use for which EPA’s Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program has identified other

acceptable alternatives that have lower global warming potential. The SNAP list of alternatives is

found at 40 CFR part 82 subpart G with supplemental tables of alternatives available at

(http://www.epa.gov/snap/).

Hydrofluorocarbons means compounds that only contain hydrogen, fluorine, and carbon.

(b) Unless otherwise specified in the contract, the Contractor shall reduce its use, release, and

emissions of high global warming potential hydrofluorocarbons and refrigerant blends containing

hydrofluorocarbons, when feasible, from foam blowing agents, under this contract. When

determining feasibility of using a particular alternative, the Contractor shall consider environmental,

technical, and economic factors such as–

(1) In-use emission rates, energy efficiency, and safety;

(2) Ability to meet performance requirements; and

(3) Commercial availability at a reasonable cost.

(c) The Contractor shall refer to EPA’s SNAP program to identify alternatives. The SNAP list of

alternatives is found at 40 CFR part 82 subpart G with supplemental tables available at

http://www.epa.gov/snap/.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.223 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SCOTT ALAN KLINE,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5422-LC-HTC

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

/

ORD ER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report

and Recommendation dated April 30, 2020 (ECF No. 2). The parties have been

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). Petitioner Kline filed a response (ECF No. 3), in which he agrees to the

dismissal of this case.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that

the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 2) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-05422-LC-HTC Document 4 Filed 05/15/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. Plaintiff's petition (ECF Doc. 1) is dismissed without prejudice.

3. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of May, 2020.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv5422-LC-HTC

Case 3:20-cv-05422-LC-HTC Document 4 Filed 05/15/20 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:20-cr-00039-MCR Document 125 Filed 04/05/21 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:20-cr-00039-MCR Document 125 Filed 04/05/21 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:20-cr-00039-MCR Document 125 Filed 04/05/21 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:20-cr-00039-MCR Document 125 Filed 04/05/21 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:20-cr-00039-MCR Document 125 Filed 04/05/21 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:20-cr-00039-MCR Document 125 Filed 04/05/21 Page 6 of 6
47.303-8 F.a.s. vessel, port of shipment.       (a)                   *Explanation of delivery term.*"F.a.s. vessel, port of shipment" means free of expense to the Government delivered alongside the ocean vessel and within reach of its loading tackle at the specified port of shipment.                                          (b)                   *Contractor responsibilities.* The contractor shall-                                                         (1)                                                                           (i) 										                    Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or                                                                              (ii) 										                    In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment for ocean transportation in conformance with carrier requirements to protect the goods and to ensure assessment of the lowest applicable transportation charge;                                                                                                           (2)                                                                           (i) 										                    Deliver the shipment in good order and condition alongside the ocean vessel and within reach of its loading tackle, at the point of delivery and on the date or within the period specified in the contract; and                                                                              (ii) 										                    Pay and bear all applicable charges, including transportation costs, wharfage, handling, and heavy lift charges, if necessary, up to this point;                                                                                                           (3) 								                Provide a clean dock or ship’s receipt;                                                            (4) 								                Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before delivery of the shipment to the point specified in the contract; and                                                            (5) 								                At the Government’s request and expense, assist in obtaining the documents required for-                                                                           (i) 										                    Exportation; or                                                                              (ii) 										                    Importation at destination.                                                                                                                            (c)                   *Contract clause.* The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at 52.247-36, F.a.s. Vessel, Port of Shipment, when the delivery term is f.a.s. vessel, port of shipment.    **Parent topic:** 47.303 Standard delivery terms and contract clauses.
#### § 58.7 Who may obtain service.

An application for inspection or grading service may be made by any interested person, including, but not limited to, the United States, any State, county, municipality, or common carrier, or any authorized agent of the foregoing.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 5:98cr02-SPM

ISRAEL HERNANDEZ,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR CREDIT FOR TIME SERVED AND

FOR RECOMMENDATION OF CONCURRENT SERVICE OF SENTENCE

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant’s motions (docs. 183

and 184) through which he seeks a reduction of his 10-year federal sentence to

account for time served prior to sentencing on an undischarged term of

imprisonment from Mexico. 

Once a sentence is imposed, the Court has jurisdiction to reduce the

sentence only for the limited circumstances listed in Rule 35, Federal Rules of

Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s motions do not fall within the scope of Rule 35. 

Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s motions (docs. 183 and

184) are denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of July, 2007.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 5:98-cr-00002-RS-AK Document 187 Filed 07/10/07 Page 1 of 1
§ 61.33 Equipment of sampler; contents of certificate. Each licensed sampler shall have available suitable triers or sampling tools, sample containers, scales, seed cleaners, seed mixers, and air-tight containers for enclosing and forwarding the official samples to licensed chemist, and with tags and samplers' certificates approved or furnished by the Director or his representative for identifying the samples of cottonseed and for certificating the condition of the cottonseed represented by such samples. There shall be clearly written or printed on the face of such certificate— ( a ) A suitable caption;
( b ) The location of the cottonseed involved and its point of origin;
( c ) The identification of the lot from which the sample was drawn;
( d ) The date on which the sample was drawn;
( e ) The gross weight of the original sample, and the net weight of the cleaned sample;
( f ) A statement indicating that the sample was drawn in accordance with sampling methods prescribed by the Director of the Cotton Division; and
( g ) The signature of the licensed sampler as such. The use of such tags and certificates shall be in conformity with instructions issued from time to time by the Division.
# L_2013242EN.01000801.xml

| 11.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 242/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 242/8

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 868/2013

of 4 September 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Garbanzo de Escacena (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Garbanzo de Escacena’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Garbanzo de Escacena’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Garbanzo de Escacena’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Garbanzo de Escacena’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 September 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 300, 5.10.2012, p. 19.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

SPAIN

Garbanzo de Escacena (PGI)

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03068]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9019-5]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 02/02/2015 Through 02/06/2015
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20150028, Final EIS, USFS, ID, Clear Creek Integrated 
Restoration Project, Review Period Ends: 03/16/2015, Contact: Lois Hill 
208-935-4257.
EIS No. 20150029, Final EIS, USFS, 00, Greater Sage Grouse Bi-State 
Distinct Population Segment Forest Plan Amendment, Review Period Ends: 
04/07/2015, Contact: James Winfrey 775-355-5308.
EIS No. 20150030, Draft EIS, USN, WA, Land-Water Interface and Service 
Pier Extension at Naval Base Kitsap Bangor, Comment Period Ends: 04/13/
2015, Contact: Thomas Dildine 360-396-0018.
EIS No. 20150031, Draft EIS, BLM, NV, Gold Rock Mine Project, Comment 
Period Ends: 03/30/2015, Contact: Dan Netcher 775-289-1872.
EIS No. 20150032, Draft EIS, BOP, KY, U.S. Penitentiary and Federal 
Prison Camp, Letcher County, Comment Period Ends: 03/30/2015, Contact: 
Issac Gaston 202-514-6470.
EIS No. 20150033, Draft EIS, USFS, ID, Salmon-Challis National Forest 
Invasive Plant Treatment, Comment Period Ends: 03/30/2015, Contact: 
Jennifer Purvine 208-879-4162.
EIS No. 20150034, Draft EIS, USACE, OR, Double-crested Cormorant 
Management Plan to Reduce Predation of Juvenile Salmonids in the 
Columbia River Estuary, Comment Period Ends: 03/16/2015, Contact: 
Robert Winters 503-808-4738.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20140372, Draft EIS, DOE, 00, Plains and Eastern Clean Line 
Transmission Project, Comment Period Ends: 04/20/2015, Contact: Jane 
Summerson, 505-845- 4091, Revision to FR Notice Published 12/29/2014; 
Extending Comment Period from 03/19/2015 to 04/20/2015

    Dated: February 10, 2015.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2015-03068 Filed 2-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
§ 58.2827 Official identification. ( a ) The official symbol to be used to identify product meeting the USDA standard for ice cream shall be as follows:
( b ) Ice cream manufacturing plants using this symbol shall be USDA approved as set forth in subpart B of this regulation, and the ice cream bearing the symbol shall be manufactured under continuous resident or continuous nonresident USDA inspection service in accordance with subpart A of this regulation. The dairy ingredients used in such ice cream shall come from USDA approved plants.
42.1106 Reporting requirements.

(a) When information on contract performance status is needed, contracting officers may require

contractors to submit production progress reports (see 42.1107(a)). Reporting requirements shall be

limited to that information essential to Government needs and shall take maximum advantage of

data output generated by contractor management systems.

(b) Contract administration offices shall review and verify the accuracy of contractor reports and

advise the contracting officer of any required action. The accuracy of contractor-prepared reports

shall be verified either by a program of continuous surveillance of the contractor’s reportpreparation system or by individual review of each report.

(c) The contract administration office may at any time initiate a report to advise the contracting

officer (and the inventory manager, if one is designated in the contract) of any potential or actual

delay in performance. This advice shall-

(1) Be in writing;

(2) Be provided in sufficient time for the contracting officer to take necessary action; and

(3) Provide a definite recommendation, if action is appropriate.

Parent topic: Subpart 42.11 - Production Surveillance and Reporting
#### In re ZIRINSKY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Attorney and Client (§ 41*)—Misconduct of Attorney—Excessive Cost Bill.

Submission of an illegal and excessive bill of costs by an attorney is a serious offense, and is misconduct justifying a reprimand, though he attempted to excuse himself on the ground of inexperience.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Attorney and Client, Cent. Dig. § 53; Dec. Dig. § 41.*]

Proceedings against David Zirinsky, an attorney, for misconduct. On motion to confirm a referee’s report. Confirmed as modified.

See, also, 146 N. Y. Supp. 1119.

Argued before JENKS, P. J., and THOMAS, RICH, STAPLETON, and PUTNAM, JJ.

Frederick W. Sparks, of Brooklyn, for the motion.

Mortimer W. Byers, of New York City, opposed.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep'r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

We do not agree with the learned referee that the proceedings should be dismissed upon the theory that the attorney was not guilty of misconduct. As we said heretofore in this proceeding, the submission of an illegal and an excessive bill of costs is a serious offense. Matter of Mashbir, 44 App. Div. 632, 60 N. Y. Supp. 451. The attorney did not establish propriety of conduct in the taxation of his costs; for there appears no justification for the insertion of some items in his bill, and also no sufficient proof that the amounts of other items were legal or were proper. The attorney’s only excuse is inexperience, and this is not excuse, but at best palliation. While, under all the facts elicited upon the hearing, we think that the attorney should neither be disbarred nor suspended, we do think that he should be thus reprimanded formally.

The record, as thus modified, is confirmed.

STAPLETON; J., takes no part.
52.234-1 Industrial Resources Developed

Under Title III, Defense Production Act.

As prescribed at 34.104 , insert the following clause:

Industrial Resources Developed Under Title III Defense Production Act (Sept 2016)

(a) Definitions. "Title III industrial resource" means materials, services, processes, or manufacturing

equipment (including the processes, technologies, and ancillary services for the use of such

equipment) established or maintained under the authority of Title III, Defense Production Act (50

U.S.C. App.2091-2093).

Title III project contractor means a contractor that has received assistance for the development or

manufacture of an industrial resource under Title III of Defense Production Act (50 U.S.C.

App.2091-2093).

(b) The Contractor shall refer any request from a Title III project contractor for testing and

qualification of a Title III industrial resource to the Contracting Officer.

(c) Upon the direction of the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall test Title III industrial

resources for qualification. The Contractor shall provide the test results to the Defense Production

Act Office, Title III Program, located at Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433-7739.

(d) When the Contracting Officer modifies the contract to direct testing pursuant to this clause, the

Government will provide the Title III industrial resource to be tested and will make an equitable

adjustment in the contract for the costs of testing and qualification of the Title III industrial

resource.

(e) The Contractor agrees to insert the substance of this clause, including paragraph (e), in every

subcontract issued in performance of this contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.234 [Reserved]