alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **National Center    for     Health Statistics            Division of Data     Services            6525 Belcrest Road     Hyattsville, MD     20782-2003     (301)458-4636      **

 
**How To...**NCHS Home | View and Download | Obtain Publications****Cite NCHS Publications****| Cite Electronic MediaObtain Birth, Death, Marriage, and Divorce    CertificatesWhere to Write |****Search NCHS | Contact us**
**Welcome**

**Use this home page**

**view** and download NCHS publications**obtain publications****cite NCHS publications****cite electronic media****obtain** birth, death, marriage, and divorce    certificates***Where to Write** for Vital Records*

 

**NCHS Home | View and    Download | Obtain Publications****Cite NCHS Publications****| Cite Electronic MediaObtain Birth, Death, Marriage, and Divorce    CertificatesWhere to Write |****Search NCHS | Contact us**
**CDC Home | Search    | Health Topics A-Z**
This page last reviewed August 18, 2000

**U.S.    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES****Centers    for Disease Control and Prevention**    National Center for Health Statistics    Division of Data Services     Hyattsville, MD    20782-2003    (301) 458-4636
 ** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
TELS CORPORATION MARCH 31, 2000 FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    1,570
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           302,325
<ALLOWANCES>                                             30,727
<INVENTORY>                                             130,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        500,766
<PP&E>                                                1,971,933
<DEPRECIATION>                                        1,545,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        1,142,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 1,387,248
<BONDS>                                                 392,310
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                 77,835
<OTHER-SE>                                             (714,982)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          1,142,411
<SALES>                                                 613,080
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        616,572
<CGS>                                                   143,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           586,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         18,577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       22,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           7,744
<INCOME-TAX>                                               (100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       7,644
<DISCONTINUED>                                          (13,284)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (5,640)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.00


</TABLE>
§ 51.2560 Definitions. ( a ) *Well dried* means the kernel is firm and crisp.
( b ) *Very well dried* means the kernel is firm and crisp and the average moisture content of the lot does not exceed 7 percent or is specified (See § 51.2561).
( c ) *Foreign material* means leaves, sticks, in-shell nuts, shells or pieces of shells, dirt, or rocks, or any other substance other than pistachio kernels. No allowable tolerances for metal or glass.
( d ) *Whole kernel* means 3 ⁄ 4 of a kernel or more.
( e ) *Splits* means more than 3 ⁄ 4 of a half kernel split lengthwise.
( f ) *Damage* means any specific defect described in paragraph (f) (1) through (2) of this section or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which materially detracts from the appearance or the edible or marketing quality of the individual kernel or of the lot. (For tolerances, see § 51.2557, Table I.) ( 1 ) *Immature kernels* are excessively thin kernels and can have black, brown or gray surface with a dark interior color and the immaturity has adversely affected the flavor of the kernel.
( 2 ) *Kernel spotting* refers to dark brown or dark gray spots aggregating more than one-eighth of the surface of the kernel.
( g ) *Serious damage* means any specific defect described in paragraph (g) (1) through (5) of this section, or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which seriously detracts from the appearance or the edible or marketing quality of the individual kernel or of the lot. (For tolerances see § 51.2557 Table I.) ( 1 ) *Mold* which is readily visible on the kernel.
( 2 ) *Minor insect or vertebrate injury* means the kernel shows conspicuous evidence of feeding.
( 3 ) *Insect damage* is an insect, insect fragment, web or frass attached to the kernel. No live insects shall be permitted.
( 4 ) *Rancidity* means the kernel is distinctly rancid to taste. Staleness of flavor shall not be classed as rancidity.
( 5 ) *Decay* means one-sixteenth or more of the kernel is decomposed.
[68 FR 50685, Aug. 22, 2003]
52.217-4 Evaluation of Options Exercised at Time of Contract Award.       As prescribed in 17.208(b), insert a provision substantially the same as the following:          Evaluation of Options Exercised at Time of Contract Award (June 1988)          Except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government’s best interests, the Government will evaluate the total price for the basic requirement together with any option(s) exercised at the time of award.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.217 [Reserved]
# 52.106 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.1 - Instructions for Using Provisions and Clauses
52.236-8 Other Contracts.

As prescribed in 36.508 , insert the following clause:

Other Contracts (Apr 1984)

The Government may undertake or award other contracts for additional work at or near the site of

the work under this contract. The Contractor shall fully cooperate with the other

contractors and with Government employees and shall carefully adapt scheduling and performing

the work under this contract to accommodate the additional work, heeding any direction that may be

provided by the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall not commit or permit any act that will

interfere with the performance of work by any other contractor or by Government employees.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.236 [Reserved]
46.705 Limitations.       (a) 						            Except for the warranties in the clauses at 52.246-3, Inspection of Supplies-Cost-Reimbursement, and 52.246-8, Inspection of Research and Development-Cost-Reimbursement, the contracting officer shall not include warranties in cost-reimbursement contracts, unless authorized in accordance with agency regulations (see 46.708).                                          (b) 						            Warranty clauses shall not limit the Government’s rights under an inspection clause (see subpart  46.3) in relation to latent defects, fraud, or gross mistakes that amount to fraud.                                          (c) 						            Except for warranty clauses in construction contracts, warranty clauses shall provide that the warranty applies notwithstanding inspection and acceptance or other clauses or terms of the contract.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 46.7 - Warranties
#### Daniel A. Udell, Appellant, v. Richard Haas, as Mayor of the Village of Lake Success, et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 19, 1964, affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. We have taken notice of the enactment of the 1965 zoning amendment. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur; Hopkins, J., dissents and votes to modify the judgment by striking out the first decretal paragraph and by substituting in place thereof a decretal paragraph declaring Ordinance No. 60 to be unconstitutional and void as to the property of plaintiff located on the easterly side of Lakeville Road and the westerly side of Summer Avenue, with the following memorandum: I am unable to distinguish between plaintiff’s property located on the westerly side of Lakeville Road (declared to be unconstitutionally zoned by the judgment appealed from) and plaintiff’s property on the easterly side of Lakeville Road and across from the first parcel. The same considerations that prompted the declaration of the invalidity of the ordi*751nance exist on the one side of Lakeville Road as on the other. By failure to appeal from that declaration of invalidity with respect to the westerly side, respondents implicitly concede that such a determination was sound and unassailable; and I think the same conclusion must likewise follow as to the easterly side. An ordinance may be discriminatory in its effect on particular parcels when it treats similar and neighboring property differently so as to exclude from the enjoyment of those parcels the uses permitted in the similar and neighboring property *[De Sena*v. *Gulde,*24 A D 2d 165, 171-172). Moreover, plaintiff’s proof in my opinion established that the application of the ordinance to the property on the easterly side resulted in a substantial economic loss of value in the property, warranting the treatment of both parcels alike (cf. *Mary Chess, Inc.*v. *City of Glen Cove,*18 N Y 2d 205, 209-211).
§ 51.3200 Samples for grade and size determination. Individual samples shall consist of at least 20 pounds for onions packed to meet larger than 21 ⁄ 4 inches maximum diameter. When individual packages contain 20 pounds or more and the onions are packed for Large or Jumbo size or larger the package shall be the sample. When individual packages contain less than 20 pounds, a sufficient number of adjoining packages are opened to provide at least a 20 pound sample, except that for onions packed to meet 21 ⁄ 4 inches maximum diameter or smaller, the sample may consist of either 20 pounds or the individual package.
**Exhibit 35.1**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify toWaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of  September 1, 2006 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer, LaSalle Bank,National Association, as Trustee, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee the following with respect to WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR13 for the 2006 fiscal year  (the “Relevant Year”):

 

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

 

 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

                                                                                   

 
| /s/ H. John Berens

___________________________________________

Name:  H. John Berens

Title:    Senior Vice President |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2719 Reported in Senate (RS)]







                                                       Calendar No. 567
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2719

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ``Earl D. 
                     Hutto Post Office Building''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2006

  Mr. Nelson of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read 
     twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

                             August 1, 2006

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ``Earl D. 
                     Hutto Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EARL D. HUTTO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Earl D. Hutto Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Earl D. 
Hutto Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 567

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2719

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ``Earl D. 
                     Hutto Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 2006

                       Reported without amendment`
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 2, 2021

t0526 

# Order

Clerk June 2, 2021

162219

CHARLES LESTER FRY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 162219

COA: 354184

Isabella CC: 19

- 015461

- NI

JOSHUA THOMAS JOHNSON,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 13, 2020

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because w e are not

persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
| (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|   |   | /s/      John J. Lennon                                                  |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | John      J. Lennon                                                      |
|   | Title: | President,      Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer         |
|   |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                                       |
|   |   |                                                                     |
|   |   | /s/      John J. Lennon                                                  |
|   | Name:  | John      J. Lennon                                                      |
|   | Title: | President,      Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer         |
|   |   | (Principal      Financial Officer and Principal      Accounting Officer) |

----
#### WICKES, Appellant, v. HIGH GROUND DAIRY CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Action by Simon Wickes against the High Ground Dairy Company.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
#### § 550.106 Mutuality of interest.

The REE Agency must document all parties' interest in the project. Mutual interest exists when all parties benefit in the same qualitative way from the objectives of the award. If one party to the non-assistance cooperative agreement would independently have an interest in the project, which is shared by the other party, and all parties contribute resources to obtain the end result of the project, mutual interest exists.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wilber Pereira, Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 307]

Appeals by the de*607fendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), both rendered December 13, 2004, convicting him of resisting arrest under indictment No. 963/04 and contempt in the second degree (two counts) under Superior Court information No. 2571/04, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
MEMORANDUM

To: e xpartecommunications@hq.doe.gov

From: Douglas Johnson

Date: November 7, 2012

Re: Docket No. EERE

- 2011

- BT

- NOA

- 0067 and RIN Number 1904

- AC52

Ex parte communication

Department of Energy

Telephone conference of November 2, 2012

This memorandum for the record provides a summary of a November 2, 2012, telephone call with

U.S. Department o f Energy staf f concerning negotiations on a potential voluntary agreement among

stakeholders regarding set

- top box energy efficiency.

Meeting attendees:

Daniel Cohen (DOE Office of General Counsel)

John Cymbalsky (DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy)

Jeremy Dommu (DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy)

Paul Glist (National Cable & Telecommunications Association)

Neal Goldberg (National Cable & Telecommunications Association)

Kathleen Hogan (DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy)

Douglas Johnson (Consumer Electronics Association)

Roland Risser (DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy)

The parties discussed a joint letter to DOE Secretary Dr. Steven Chu , dated November 1, 2012, by the

Appliance Standards Awareness Project, Consumer Electronics Association, National Cable &

Telecommunications Association, and Natural Resources Defense Council . A copy of the letter is

attached.November 1, 2012

Honorable Dr. Steven Chu

Secretary of Energy

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Ave., S.W.

Washington, DC 20585

Dear Secretary Chu:

We are writing to thank you for adjusting DOE’s rulemaking schedule for set top boxes to allow time for

negotiations on a potential voluntary agreement among stakeholders. Over the past several months,

the parties have met repeatedly and exchanged a range of proposals. We were not able to reach

agreement by our self

- impo sed deadline of October 1, but extended discussions in an attempt to get an

agreement. Unfortunately, despite intensive, good

- faith efforts, the parties were not able to reach a

consensus and the undersigned Advocates have now terminated negotiations.

Even though we were not successful in reaching a consensus agreement, DOE’s pause in the regulatory

process provided an opportunity for all stakeholders to become better informed about the

opportunities and constraints with respect to set top box energy ef ficiency improvements. We thank

you for providing us the opportunity to pursue a negotiated outcome. All of us will continue to be

actively engaged in our own significant efforts to achieve greater energy efficiency in set

- top boxes.

Sincerely yours,

/s / Noah Horowitz

Andrew deLaski Noah Horowitz

Executive Director Senior Scientist

Appliance Standards Awareness Pro ject Natural Resources Defens e Council

/s/ Neal Goldberg /s/ Doug Johnson

Neal Goldberg Doug Johnson

Vice President & General Counsel Vice President, Technology Policy

National Cable & Telecommunications Association Consumer Electronics Association

Cc: Dr. Kathleen Hogan, Roland Risser, John Cymbalsky, Jeremy Dommu