Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R01-OAR-2010-0934; A-1-FRL-9235-2]
 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
 ACTION: Proposed rule.
 SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to determine that the Boston-Manchester-Portsmouth (SE), New Hampshire moderate 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area continues to attain the 1997 8-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. This determination is based upon complete, quality-assured, certified ambient air monitoring data that show the area has monitored attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the 2007-2009 monitoring period. Preliminary data available through June 15, 2010 also are consistent with continued attainment. In addition, in accordance with the Clean Air Act, EPA is proposing to determine that this area has attained the 1997 ozone NAAQS as of June 15, 2010, its applicable attainment date.
 DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 5, 2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-R01-OAR-2010-0934 by one of the following methods: 1. 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov*: Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. 2. 
                        *E-mail: arnold.anne@epa.gov.* 3. 
                        *Fax:*
                         (617) 918-0047. 4. 
                        *Mail:*
                         “Docket Identification Number EPA-R01-OAR-2010-0934, ” Anne Arnold, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (mail code: OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912. 5. 
                        *Hand Delivery or Courier.*
                         Deliver your comments to: Anne Arnold, Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit, Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA 02109-3912. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding legal holidays. *Instructions:*
                         Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R01-OAR-2010-0934. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov*, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov*, or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected. The 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov*
                         Web site is an “anonymous access” system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov*
                         your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. *Docket:*
                         All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov*
                         index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, 
                        *i.e.,*
                         CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov*
                         or in hard copy at Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA. 
                        ( print page 75657)
                        EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the 
                        **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**
                         section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding legal holidays.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard P. Burkhart, Air Quality Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA 02109-3912, telephone number (617) 918-1664, fax number (617) 918-0664, e-mail 
                        *Burkhart.Richard@epa.gov*.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever “we,” “us,” or “our” is used, we mean EPA. Organization of this document. The following outline is provided to aid in locating information in this preamble. I. What actions is EPA taking? II. What is the effect of these actions? III. What is the background for these actions? IV. What is EPA's analysis of the relevant air quality data? V. Proposed Actions VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What actions is EPA taking? EPA is proposing to determine that the Boston-Manchester-Portsmouth (SE), New Hampshire moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area continues to attain the 1997 8-hour NAAQS for ozone. This determination is based upon complete, quality-assured and certified ambient air monitoring data that show the area has monitored attainment of the 1997 ozone NAAQS for the 2007-2009 monitoring period. Data available through June 15, 2010, in the EPA Air Quality System (AQS) are also consistent with continued attainment. In addition, under section 181(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA is proposing to determine that this area has attained the 1997 ozone NAAQS by its applicable attainment date (June 15, 2010). II. What is the effect of these actions? Under section 181(b)(2)(A) of the CAA and the provisions of EPA's ozone implementation rule (see 40 CFR Section 51.902(a)), EPA is proposing to determine that this area has attained the 1997 ozone NAAQS by its applicable attainment date of June 15, 2010. The effect of a final determination of attainment by the area's attainment date would be to discharge EPA's obligation under section 181(b)(2)(A), and to establish that, in accordance with that section, the area would not be reclassified for failure to attain by its applicable attainment date. This proposed action, if finalized, would not constitute a redesignation to attainment under the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 107(d)(3), because we would not yet have an approved maintenance plan for the area as required under section 175A of the CAA, nor a determination that the area has met the other requirements for redesignation. The classification and designation status of the area would remain moderate nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS until such time as EPA determines that the area meets the CAA requirements for redesignation to attainment. The further effect of this proposed action is to reaffirm EPA's prior determination of attainment for this area (
                    *See*73 FR 14387 (March 18, 2004)), and thus, pursuant to 40 CFR. 51.918, to continue the suspension of New Hampshire's obligation to make certain SIP submissions for this area. III. What is the background for these actions? On April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23857), EPA designated as nonattainment any area that was violating the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS based on the three most recent years (2001-2003) of air quality data. The Boston-Manchester-Portsmouth (SE), New Hampshire area was designated as a moderate ozone nonattainment area. Subsequently, on March 18, 2008, EPA published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     a determination that the area was attaining the 1997 8-hour ozone standard, based on complete, quality-assured and certified data for 2004-2006. (
                    *See*73 FR 14387). That action suspended the obligation for the area to submit an attainment demonstration, a reasonable further progress plan, section 172(c)(9) contingency measures, and any other planning State Implementation Plans (SIPs) related to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for so long as the area continues to attain the 1997 ozone NAAQS. 40 CFR 51.918. Complete, certified ozone air quality data for 2007 through 2009, as well as complete, quality-assured, but not yet certified, ozone data available in AQS, through June 15, 2010, show that the Boston-Manchester-Portsmouth (SE), New Hampshire area continues to meet the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. Additional, preliminary ozone data available through September 30, 2010, continues to show this area meets the ozone NAAQS. IV. What is EPA's analysis of the relevant air quality data? The EPA has reviewed the ambient air monitoring data for ozone, consistent with the requirements contained in 40 CFR part 50 and recorded in the Air Quality Data System (AQS) database, for Boston-Manchester-Portsmouth (SE), New Hampshire area, from 2007 through 2009. On the basis of its review, EPA proposes to conclude that the area attained the 1997 8-hour ozone standard at the end of the 2009 ozone season, based on 3 years of complete, quality-assured and State-certified 2007-2009 ozone data. Preliminary data available in the EPA Air Quality System, through June 15, 2010 are also consistent with continued attainment. Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR part 50, the 1997 8-hour ozone standard is attained at a site when the 3-year average of the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations at an ozone monitor is less than or equal to 0.08 parts per million (ppm) (
                    *i.e.,*
                     0.084 ppm, based on the rounding convention in 40 CFR part 50, appendix I). This 3-year average is referred to as the design value. When the design value is less than or equal to 0.084 ppm at each monitoring site within the area, then the area is meeting the NAAQS. Also, the data completeness requirement is met when the average percent of days with valid ambient monitoring data is greater than 90%, and no single year has less than 75% data completeness as determined in Appendix I of 40 CFR part 50. Table 1 shows the fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations for the Boston-Manchester-Portsmouth (SE), New Hampshire nonattainment area monitors for the years 2007-2009, and the ozone design values for these same monitors based on 2007-2009. Table 1—2007-2009 Fourth-High 8-Hour Average Ozone Concentrations and 2007-2009 Design Values (parts per million) in the Boston-Manchester-Portsmouth (SE), New Hampshire Area
Location
AQS site ID
4th high 2007
4th high 2008
4th high 2009
Design value (07-09)Manchester
330110020
0.074
0.064
0.060
0.066( print page 75658)Nashua
330111011
0.081
0.067
0.066
0.071Portsmouth
330150014
0.078
0.069
0.070
0.072Rye
330150016
0.086
0.075
0.068
0.076
 EPA's review of these data indicates that the Boston-Manchester-Portsmouth (SE), New Hampshire ozone nonattainment area has met the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, based on 2007-2009 data. EPA believes these data, coupled with preliminary data available through June 15, 2010, indicate that the Boston-Manchester-Portsmouth (SE), New Hampshire area has also attained the standard as of its applicable attainment date of June 15, 2010. Thus, in accordance with CAA section 181(b)(2), EPA is also proposing to determine that the Boston-Manchester-Portsmouth (SE), New Hampshire area has attained the standard by its applicable attainment date. EPA is soliciting public comment on the issues discussed in this notice or on other relevant matters pertaining to this rulemaking action. These comments will be considered before EPA takes final action. Interested parties may participate in the Federal rulemaking procedure by submitting written comments to the EPA New England Regional Office listed in the 
                    **ADDRESSES**
                     section of this 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . V. Proposed Actions EPA is proposing to determine that the Boston-Manchester-Portsmouth (SE), New Hampshire 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area continues to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone standard, based on complete, quality-assured data from 2007 through 2009. Data for 2010 that are available in AQS through June 30, 2010 are consistent with continued attainment. As provided in 40 CFR Section 51.918, if EPA finalizes this determination, the requirements for New Hampshire to submit planning SIPs related to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for this area remain suspended, for so long as the area continues to attain the standard. In addition, under section 181(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act and the provisions of EPA's ozone implementation rule (
                    *see*40 CFR 51.902(a)), EPA is proposing to determine that this area has attained the 1997 ozone NAAQS by its applicable attainment date of June 15, 2010. VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews These actions propose to make determinations of attainment based on air quality, and would, if finalized, result in the continued suspension of certain Federal requirements, and would not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, these proposed actions: Are not a “significant regulatory action” subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget underExecutive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
                Do not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 
                    *et seq.*);
                Are certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 
                    *et seq.*);
                Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
                Do not have Federalism implications as specified inExecutive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
                Are not economically significant regulatory actions based on health or safety risks subject toExecutive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
                Are not significant regulatory actions subject toExecutive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
                Are not subject to the requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and
                Do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, underExecutive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection
Air pollution control
Incorporation by reference
Intergovernmental relations
Nitrogen dioxide
Ozone
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
Volatile organic compounds
 Authority:
                    42 U.S.C. 7401 
                        *et seq.* Dated: November 24, 2010. Ira W. Leighton, Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.


[FR Doc. 2010-30493 Filed 12-3-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P