alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2527 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Fenamidone. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Fenamidone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FENAMIDONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.38 (5S)–3,5-Dihydro-5- methyl2-(methylthio)- 5-phenyl-3- 

(phenylamino)- 4H-imidazol4-one (Fenamidone) (CAS 

No. 161326–34–7) (provided 

for in subheading 

2933.29.35) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 2527 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elmo Culp, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, motion to suppress granted, and matter remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: The police officers testified that they had received word from an informant that defendant was "dealing” in drugs "out of’ a specified apartment; that they knew defendant very well, having arrested him many times within the previous two years, and *589they knew his inclination to deal in drugs. They testified that they did not have sufficient information to obtain a warrant to arrest him or to search him or the apartment, and so they went to the apartment to investigate. They had no intention of entering unless invited. On arrival at the apartment they knocked and defendant, answering from within, asked "Who is it?” The officers answered, "It’s the 'D’ Squad, Danny, Joe and Tom”, whom defendant knew. Defendant replied, "Wait a minute”, and they heard him move from the door. On prior occasions the officers had found that defendant would hide drugs or throw them away; and so Officer Fay immediately went to the side of the building to observe. He saw defendant on the window ledge outside of the apartment, and directed him to stay there; but the ledge and the pipe on which he was holding broke away from the building and defendant fell to the ground, landing on his back on the sidewalk. Although defendant was apparently somewhat hurt, the officer saw him instantly reach for and grab a cigarette pack protruding from his pants pocket. The officer pushed his hand away and took the pack from him and found that it contained heroin. He then arrested defendant. A warrantless search or seizure is presumptively unreasonable *(People v Hodge,*44 NY2d 553, 557), and the People have the burden of overcoming that presumption *(Coolidge v New Hampshire,*403 US 443, 454-455). Upon the facts in this case the officer lacked probable cause to believe that defendant possessed illegal drugs. To be sure, his action in exiting the apartment via the window was suspicious but not necessarily related to the possession of drugs *(People v Martin,*48 AD2d 213, 217). Thus, the officer at best only had a suspicion that the cigarette pack contained a drug. Moreover, at that moment, in the presence of Officer Fay and a fellow officer, defendant’s acts could not reasonably be interpreted as an abandonment or a possible successful effort to dispose of the package (see *People v Anderson,*24 NY2d 12). Seizure of defendant’s property at this point was a forbidden intrusion upon his constitutional right of privacy *(People v De Bour [People v La Pene],*40 NY2d 210, 226), and so the seized property should have been suppressed. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court—attempted criminal possession controlled substance, fifth degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
52.222-3 Convict Labor.

As prescribed in 22.202 , insert the following clause:

Convict Labor (June 2003)

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this clause, the Contractor shall not employ in the

performance of this contract any person undergoing a sentence of imprisonment imposed by any

court of a State, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American

Samoa, Guam, or the U.S. Virgin Islands.

(b) The Contractor is not prohibited from employing persons-

(1) On parole or probation to work at paid employment during the term of their sentence;

(2) Who have been pardoned or who have served their terms; or

(3) Confined for violation of the laws of any of the States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the

Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Guam, or the U.S. Virgin Islands who are authorized to

work at paid employment in the community under the laws of such jurisdiction, if-

(i) The worker is paid or is in an approved work training program on a voluntary basis;

(ii) Representatives of local union central bodies or similar labor union organizations have been

consulted;

(iii) Such paid employment will not result in the displacement of employed workers, or be applied in

skills, crafts, or trades in which there is a surplus of available gainful labor in the locality, or impair

existing contracts for services;

(iv) The rates of pay and other conditions of employment will not be less than those paid or provided

for work of a similar nature in the locality in which the work is being performed; and

(v) The Attorney General of the United States has certified that the work-release laws or regulations

of the jurisdiction involved are in conformity with the requirements of Executive Order11755, as

amended by Executive Orders 12608 and 12943.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
§ 756.2 Administration. ( a ) The OFF Program will be administered under the general supervision of the Administrator, FSA, and the Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs, FSA. The OFF Program is carried out by FSA State committees and FSA county committees with instructions issued by the Deputy Administrator.
( b ) FSA State committees and FSA county committees, and representatives and their employees, do not have authority to modify or waive any of the provisions of the regulations in this part, except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section.
( c ) The FSA State committee will take any required action not taken by the FSA county committee. The FSA State committee will also: ( 1 ) Correct or require correction of an action taken by an FSA county committee that is not in compliance with this part; or
( 2 ) Require an FSA county committee to not take an action or implement a decision that is not under the regulations of this part.
( d ) The Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs, FSA, or a designee, may determine any question arising under these programs, or reverse or modify a determination made by an FSA State committee or FSA county committee.
( e ) The Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs, FSA, may authorize FSA State committees and FSA county committees to waive or modify non-statutory deadlines and other program requirements in cases where lateness or failure to meet such other requirements does not adversely affect the operation of the OFF Program.
( f ) A representative of FSA may execute applications and related documents only under the terms and conditions determined and announced by FSA. Any document not executed under such terms and conditions, including any purported execution before the date authorized by FSA, will be null and void.
( g ) Items of general applicability to program participants, including, but not limited to, application periods, application deadlines, internal operating guidelines issued to State and county offices, prices, and payment factors established by the OFF Program, are not subject to appeal.
#### § 63.401 Use of information.

Information from records or reports required pursuant to this part shall be made available to the Secretary as is appropriate for the administration or enforcement of the Act or rules and regulation issued thereunder.
52.228-17 Individual Surety—Pledge of

Assets (Bid Guarantee).

As prescribed in 28.203-4 (a), insert the following provision:

Individual Surety—Pledge of Assets (Feb 2021)

(a)Offerors shall obtain from each person acting as an individual surety on a bid guarantee—

(1)A pledge of assets that meets the eligibility, valuation, and security requirements described in the

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 28.203-1; and

(2)Standard Form 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety.

(b)The Offeror shall include with its offer the information required at paragraph (a) of this provision

within the timeframe specified in the provision at FAR 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee, or as otherwise

established by the Contracting Officer.

(c)The Contracting Officer may release the security interest on the individual surety's assets in

support of a bid guarantee based upon evidence that the offer supported by the individual surety will

not result in contract award.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.228 [Reserved]
#### § 52.20 Issuance of an inspection report in lieu of an inspection certificate.

A letter report in lieu of an inspection certificate may be issued by an inspector when such action appears to be more suitable than an inspection certificate: *Provided,* That, the issuance of such report is approved by the Administrator.
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bush Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 29, 2003 (the Report) I, Robert L. Ayres, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/     ROBERT L.
AYRES    
|Robert L. Ayres            
|President,                 
|Chief Operating Officer and
|Chief Financial Officer    



May 9, 2003



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company pursuant to the Exchange Act and does not constitute a part of the Report.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
52.208-7 Tagging of Leased Vehicles.

As prescribed in 8.1104(d), insert a clause substantially as follows:

Tagging of Leased Vehicles (May 1986)

While it is the intent that vehicles leased under this contract will operate on Federal tags, the

Government reserves the right to utilize State tags if necessary to accomplish its mission. Should

State tags be required, the Contractor shall furnish the Government documentation necessary to

allow acquisition of such tags. Federal tags are the responsibility of the Government.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.208 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bond Laboratories, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K /A for the period ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael
Abrams , Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





BOND LABORATORIES, INC


By /s/ Michael Abrams


Michael Abrams


Chief Financial officer


June 3, 2010
52.219-12 Special 8(a) Subcontract Conditions.       As prescribed in 19.811-3(b), insert the following clause:          Special 8(a) Subcontract Conditions (Oct 2019)                                       (a) 						            The Small Business Administration (SBA) has entered into Contract No.________ [*insert number of contract*] with the _________ [*insert name of contracting agency*] to furnish the supplies or services as described therein. A copy of the contract is attached hereto and made a part hereof.                                          (b) 						            The ___________ [*insert name of subcontractor*], hereafter referred to as the subcontractor, agrees and acknowledges as follows:                                                         (1) 								                That it will, for and on behalf of the SBA, fulfill and perform all of the requirements of Contract No. ______ [*insert number of contract*] for the consideration stated therein and that it has read and is familiar with each and every part of the contract.                                                            (2) 								                That the SBA has delegated responsibility, except for novation agreements, for the administration of this subcontract to the _______ [*insert name of contracting agency*] with complete authority to take any action on behalf of the Government under the terms and conditions of this subcontract.                                                            (3) 								                That it will notify the __________ [*insert name of contracting agency*] Contracting Officer in writing immediately upon entering an agreement (either oral or written) to transfer all or part of its stock or other ownership interest to any other party.                                                                             (c) 						            Payments, including any progress payments under this subcontract, will be made directly to the subcontractor by the ______ [*insert name of contracting agency*].                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.219 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 34.1**

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Structured Repackaging platform (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i), 1122 (d)(1)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(4)(i), 1122 (d)(4)(vi), and 1122 (d)(4)(ix) through 1122 (d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about theCompany's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures werenot designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, for the Structured Repackaging platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Ernst & Young LLP

February 26, 2007

 

----
Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JESSE ALLAN MAYO,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5813-MCR-EMT

GRAHAM FOUNTAIN,

Respondent.

__________________________/

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on April 13, 

2021. ECF No. 16. Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-05813-MCR-EMT Document 17 Filed 06/10/21 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No. 3:20cv5813-MCR-EMT

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 

16, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court and failure to keep the court apprised of his current 

address.

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of June 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05813-MCR-EMT Document 17 Filed 06/10/21 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No. 3:20cv5813-MCR-EMT

Case 3:20-cv-05813-MCR-EMT Document 17 Filed 06/10/21 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 555 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 6

AO 245B (Rev. 06/05) Judgme.nt in Criminal Case

Sheet 2 - hnprisonment

Judgmeat - Page 2 of 6

DEFENDANT: JAMES EARL HUBBARD

CASE NUMBER: 2:06cr169-013-WKW

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a

total term of:

38 Months, with both counts to run concurrently.

XThe court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons:

The Court recommends that defendant be designated to a facility where intensive drug treatment is available.

X The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

LiThe defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district:

Elat ____________________ El am. El p.m. on

[1 as notified by the United States Marshal.

LiThe defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons:

El before 2 p.m. on

El as notified by the United States Marshal.

El as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

Defendant delivered on o

to 1

at JVt '3rkiij,' ( ( J/ , with a certified copy of this judgment.

RETURNED AND FILED

By 11 U

- DPUTY UNITED STATES 5ARSHAL

WRI72oc

CLERK

U. S. DIS rRcT cou

MiOLE D3T. OF ALA.

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 586 Filed 03/12/2008 Page 1 of 1
[LETTERHEAD OF SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.]


GMAC-RFC
2255 N. Ontario Street, Ste 400
Burbank, CA  91504
Attention: Compliance Officer


        Re: Annual Compliance Statement for RFMSI SERIES 2006-S9 TRUST

        In connection  with the loans serviced by SunTrust  Mortgage,  Inc. (the
"Company")  pursuant to the Company's Servicing  Agreement(s)/Purchase  and Sale
Agreement(s)  with  GMAC-RFC  and  any  applicable  Reconstitution  Agreement(s)
(together,  the "Transaction  Agreements"),  I, the undersigned officer,  hereby
certify the following as of December 31, 2006:

(i)  The Company  conducted a review of its  activities  during the  immediately
     preceding  calendar  year  (or  applicable  portion  thereof)  and  of  its
     performance  under the Transaction  Agreements  during such period has been
     made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the  best  of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Company  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations  under the  Transaction  Agreements in all
     material  respects  throughout  such calendar year (or  applicable  portion
     thereof),  except  that as of  January 1, 2006,  the  Company  did not have
     procedures for monitoring  compliance with requirements as specified in the
     applicable transaction agreements governing SEC Regulation AB transactions.
     To address the absence of such  procedures,  the Company's  management  has
     undertaken and completed the following  actions:  (a) completed a review of
     each  Transaction  Agreement and identified if there was specific  language
     affecting any of the Servicing  Criteria  outlined in Section 1122;  (b) to
     the degree that the Transaction  Agreements  required  specific  procedures
     related to the servicing  criteria,  the Company's  Reference Point Library
     (where all  policies and  procedures  are  maintained)  was updated to this
     effect;  (c)  for  each  pool,  a  Control  Matrix  was  completed  (and is
     maintained on a current basis)  identifying  which  Transaction  Agreements
     control each pool;  and (d)  established a monthly review process where the
     Company's  managers  review key factors of  performance  under  Transaction
     Agreements and respond to a questionnaire  indicating  compliance with such
     factors.



        IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I do hereby  certify the  foregoing as of the date
hereof.

        /s/ John R. Purcell, Jr.

        John R. Purcell, Jr.
        Senior Vice President - Manager, Servicing Division

        Date:  February 27, 2007