alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM RICKY BOYD,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 72 WM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of November , 2019, the “Petition for Assumption of

Jurisdiction” is DENIED.
EX-10.2






EXHIBIT
10.2




Pet DRx Corporation 2009 Non-Employee Director Compensation Program




The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Pet DRx Corporation (the “Company”) adopted the Company’s
2009 Non-Employee Director Compensation Program (the “Director Program”) upon the recommendation of
the Compensation Committee of the Board. Under the Director Program, the Company will compensate
members of the Board who are not employees of the Company or its subsidiaries for their service on
the Board and its committees as follows. Each non-employee director will receive a grant of an
option to purchase 65,000 shares of Company common stock upon his or her appointment to the Board,
which will generally vest on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant. On an annual basis,
each non-employee director will receive a grant of an option to purchase 24,000 shares of Company
common stock, which will be vested upon grant. Additionally, on an annual basis, the Chairs of the
Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
will each receive an option to purchase 15,000 shares. These options will be vested upon grant.
All options granted will have a term of ten years, subject to earlier termination upon a director’s
termination of service with the Company. Non-employee directors will also be entitled to be
reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with Board and committee meetings. No other
compensation will be paid or provided to the Company’s non-employee directors.
#### § 621.10 Description.

Cooperative river basin studies provide USDA planning assistance to Federal, State, and local governments. The purpose of these studies is to assist in appraising water and related land resources; defining and determining the extent of the problems; and formulating alternative plans, including land treatment, nonstructural or structural measures, or combinations thereof, that would solve existing problems or meet existing and projected needs. These studies concentrate on specific objectives identified by the requesting agencies and citizen groups that are consistent with USDA authorities and responsibilities and current NRCS priorities. The objectives ordinarily include the formulation of a plan but may require only inventories of available resources and associated problems to be used by other agencies in plan formulation. USDA assistance is provided through field advisory committees composed of representatives of the Economic Research Service, Forest Service, and NRCS. The NRCS representative chairs the field advisory committee.
52.214-13 [Reserved]

Parent topic: 52.214 [Reserved]
50.205-1 SAFETY Act Considerations.

(a) SAFETY Act applicability. Requiring activities should review requirements to identify potential

technologies that prevent, detect, identify, or deter acts of terrorism or limit the harm such acts

might cause, and may be appropriate for SAFETY Act protections. In questionable cases, the agency

shall consult with DHS. For acquisitions involving such technologies, the requiring activity should

ascertain through discussions with DHS whether a block designation or block certification exists for

the technology being acquired.

(1) If one does exist, the requiring activity should request that the contracting officer notify offerors.

(2) If one does not exist, see 50.205-2, Pre-qualification designation notice.

(b) Early consideration of the SAFETY Act. Acquisition officials shall consider SAFETY Act issues as

early in the acquisition cycle as possible (see 7.105(b)(20)(v)). Normally, this would be at the point

where the required capabilities or performance characteristics are addressed. This is important

because the processing times for issuing determinations on all types of SAFETY Act applications

vary depending on many factors, including the influx of applications to DHS and the technical

complexity of individual applications.

(c) Industry outreach. When applicable, acquisition officials should include SAFETY Act

considerations in all industry outreach efforts including, but not limited to, requests for information,

draft requests for proposal, and industry conferences.

(d) Reciprocal waiver of claims. For purposes of 6 CFR 25.5(e), the Government is not a customer

from which a contractor must request a reciprocal waiver of claims.

Parent topic: 50.205 Procedures.
|         |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                            |
|  

**Table of Contents**              |
EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002George W. Hamlin, IV, President and Chief Executive Officer and Lawrence A. Heilbronner, Chief Financial Officer, of Canandaigua National Corporation (the "Company"), each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008, and that to the best of his knowledge:  (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Company.The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.August 7, 2008/s/ George W. Hamlin, IV/s/ Lawrence A. HeilbronnerGeorge W. Hamlin, IVLawrence A. HeilbronnerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
47.305-12 Delivery of Government-furnished

property.

(a)

(1) When Government property is furnished to a contractor and transportation costs to the

Government are a factor in the evaluation of offers, the contracting officer shall include in the

solicitation a clear description of the property, its location, and other information necessary for the

preparation of cost estimates.

(2) The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at 52.247-55, F.o.b.

Point for Delivery of Government-Furnished Property, when Government property is to be furnished

under a contract and the Government will be responsible for transportation arrangements and costs.

(b) The contracting officer shall describe explosive and dangerous material according to-

(1) The regular freight classification and

(2) The hazardous material description and hazard class as shown in 49 CFR172.101.

Parent topic: 47.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
#### ADAMS v. ADAMS et al.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

October 30, 1912.)

No. 2,394.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia; Wm. B. Sheppard, Judge.

J. N. Talley, Alexander Akerman, and Charles Akerman, all of Macon, Ga., for appellant.

Henry O. Cunningham, of Savannah, Ga., Robert U. Berner, of Macon. Ga,., and Arthur G. Powell, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellees.

Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and MEEK!, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The administratrix appellee cannot be controlled as to the forum in which she should prosecute her suit for damages. In the event she recovers judgment, the appellants here can then assert and protect any rights she may have in regard to distribution and proceeds of the judgment recovered. Affirmed,
52.247-9 Agreed Weight-General Freight.

As prescribed in 47.207-4(a)(1), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for

transportation or for transportation-related services when the shipping activity determines the

weight of shipments of freight other than household goods or office furniture:

Agreed Weight-General Freight (Apr 1984)

The shipping activity shall determine the weight of each shipment. The weight shall be shown on the

covering shipping document and shall be accepted by the Contractor as the agreed weight.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
#### § 3565.155 Identity of interest.

At the time of application, the lender must certify that it has disclosed any and all identity of interest relationships and preexisting conditions with respect to its relationships and that of the borrower, or that no identity of interest relationships exists. Identity of interest relationships include any financial or other relationship that exists or will exist between a lender, borrower, management agent, supplier, or any agent of any of these entities, that could influence, give the appearance of influencing or have the potential to influence the actions of the parties in carrying out their responsibilities under the program. Disclosure will be in a form and manner established by the Agency.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

EDGAR ZUNIGA-MEJIA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-284-RV/MJF 

FILIPCZACK, et al., 

Defendants. 

 / 

ORDER 

 This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated March 15, 2021 (ECF No. 8). The parties have been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that 

the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order. 

Case 5:20-cv-00284-RV-MJF Document 9 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

5:20-cv-258-RV/MJF 

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 1915A(b)(1) for maliciousness and abuse of the judicial 

process. 

3. The clerk of the court shall close the case file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of April 2021. 

 s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:20-cv-00284-RV-MJF Document 9 Filed 04/21/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Greg
Schott, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MuleSoft, Inc.; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 23, 2018



/s/ Greg SchottGreg SchottChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Dana C. Russell, Chief Financial Officer of Novell, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certify that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * *



|                       
|-----------------------
|CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                       
|/s/ DANA C. RUSSELL    
|Dana C. Russell        

Date: March 10, 2008
52.236-14 Availability and Use of Utility

Services.

As prescribed in 36.514 , insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price

construction contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements contract

is contemplated, the contract is to be performed on Government sites when the contracting officer

decides (a) that the existing utility system is adequate for the needs of both the Government and the

contractor, and (b) furnishing it is in the Government’s interest. When this clause is used, the

contracting officer shall list the available utilities in the contract.

Availability and Use of Utility Services (Apr 1984)

(a) The Government shall make all reasonably required amounts of utilities available to the

Contractor from existing outlets and supplies, as specified in the contract. Unless otherwise

provided in the contract, the amount of each utility service consumed shall be charged to or paid for

by the Contractor at prevailing rates charged to the Government or, where the utility is produced by

the Government, at reasonable rates determined by the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall

carefully conserve any utilities furnished without charge.

(b) The Contractor, at its expense and in a workmanlike manner satisfactory to the Contracting

Officer, shall install and maintain all necessary temporary connections and distribution lines, and all

meters required to measure the amount of each utility used for the purpose of determining charges.

Before final acceptance of the work by the Government, the Contractor shall remove all the

temporary connections, distribution lines, meters, and associated paraphernalia.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.236 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 31.1

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
            UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:

1.   I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form 10-K and all  reports  on Form 10-D
     required  to be filed in respect of the  period  covered by this  report on
     Form  10-K of RAMP  Series  2006-RZ4  Trust  (the  "Exchange  Act  periodic
     reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
     do not contain any untrue  statement of a material  fact or omit to state a
     material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in light of the
     circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading with
     respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based  on my  knowledge,  all  of the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
     information  required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
     by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.   I am responsible  for reviewing the  activities  performed by the servicers
     and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing
     the servicer compliance  statements required in this report under Item 1123
     of  Regulation  AB, and except as  disclosed  in the  Exchange Act periodic
     reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
     agreements in all material respects; and

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing  criteria for
     asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
     of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed  securities required
     to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
     and Exchange  Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been  included as an exhibit
     to this report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
     instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
     provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and
The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.

Date: March 26, 2007

        By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SHAUNTWAN BARNES,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:21-cv-5-TKW-MJF

MARK INCH, et al.,

Defendants.

/

SHOW CAUSE ORDER

On January 11, 2021, this court ordered Plaintiff to file the following within 

thirty days: (1) an amended civil rights complaint on the court-approved form, and 

(2) the $402.00 filing fee, or a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. 

(Doc. 3). On February 12, 2021, the court extended Plaintiff’s deadline to March 12, 

2021. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 4, 

7), but has not complied with the remaining requirement of the order. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED: Within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the 

date of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause why this case should not be dismissed 

for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with this court’s order.

SO ORDERED this 17th day of March, 2021.

Case 5:21-cv-00005-TKW-MJF Document 8 Filed 03/17/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

/s/ Michael J. Frank 

Michael J. Frank

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:21-cv-00005-TKW-MJF Document 8 Filed 03/17/21 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 151 Filed 03/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 151 Filed 03/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Bond Laboratories, Inc.., (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott
      Landow, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





BOND
      LABORATORIES, INC.




By
      /s/ Scott Landow




Scott
      Landow


Chairman,
      CEO


(Sole
      executive officer of the registrant)


June
      1, 2007
### Re: Ruston ESD Final Chester Culley to: Katrina Coltrain, wanda.ballou 11/10/2009 10:24 AM Cc: Buddy Parr, "David Reeves", "dtripp@stinsonmoheck.com"

Thank you Katrina.

From : Coltrain.Katrina@epamail.epa.gov <Coltrain.Katrina@epamail.epa.gov> To : wanda.ballou@la.gov <wanda.ballou@la.gov>; Chester Culley Cc : Parr.Buddy@epamail.epa.gov <Parr.Buddy@epamail.epa.gov> Sent : Tue Nov 10 09:01:24 2009 Subject : Ruston ESD Final

Wanda/Chet, please find attached the final ESD for Ruston Foundry. This ESD documents site unlimited use and unrestricted exposure while removing the requirements for O&M, ICs, and five-year reviews.

This is the final copy. No hard copy to follow.

Katrina Higgins-Coltrain Remedial Project Manager USEPA Superfund Louisiana/New Mexico/Oklahoma Team (6SF-RL) 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75202 214-665-8143 214-665-6660 (fax)
#### Empire Brushes, Inc., et al., Respondents. v. Emanuel Gantz et al., Appellants.

Appeal by defendants from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 18, 1968, which denied their motion to vacate plaintiffs’ demand for a bill of particulars or, in the alternative, to strike out certain items from the demand. Order modified, on the law and in *647the exercise of discretion, by adding thereto a provision that the motion is granted to the extent of striking out Items 2(a), 5(b) and 6 of the demand. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the items herewith stricken are not designed to amplify the pleading to which they are directed and improperly seek information as to investigation procedures and evidentiary sources used by defendants. Items challenged for the first time in defendants’ brief and not specified in their notice of motion have not been considered. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
# C_2014461EN.01002001.xml

| 20.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 461/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 461/20

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 December 2014

adopting the Council's position on draft amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2014

(2014/C 461/12)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1) and in particular Article 41 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| — | the Union's budget for the financial year 2014 was definitively adopted on 20 November 2013 (2), |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union's budget for the financial year 2014 was definitively adopted on 20 November 2013 (2),

2

| — | on 28 November 2014, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 8 to the general budget for the financial year 2014, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 28 November 2014, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 8 to the general budget for the financial year 2014,

| — | given the fact that draft amending budget No 8 to the general budget for 2014 needs to be adopted without delay, it is justified to shorten, in accordance with Article 3(3) of the Council's Rules of Procedure, the eight-week period for the information of national Parliaments, as well as the ten-day period foreseen for placing the item on the Council's provisional agenda laid down in Article 4 of Protocol No 1, |
| --- | --- |

—

given the fact that draft amending budget No 8 to the general budget for 2014 needs to be adopted without delay, it is justified to shorten, in accordance with Article 3(3) of the Council's Rules of Procedure, the eight-week period for the information of national Parliaments, as well as the ten-day period foreseen for placing the item on the Council's provisional agenda laid down in Article 4 of Protocol No 1,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council's position on draft amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2014 was adopted on 12 December 2014.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, 12 December 2014.

For the Council

The President

S. GIANNINI

---

(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 51, 20.2.2014, p. 1, with corrigenda in OJ L 111, 15.4.2014, p. 96, OJ L 124, 25.4.2014, p. 30 and OJ L 322, 7.11.2014, p. 1.

2

---