alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 51.692 Standard sizing. ( a ) Boxes, cartons, bag packs, or bulk loads in which oranges are not packed according to a definite pattern do not meet the requirements of standard pack, but may be certified as meeting the requirements of standard sizing: *Provided,* that the ranges are fairly uniform in size as defined in § 51.691.
( b ) In order to allow for variations incident to proper packing, not more than 5 percent of the containers in any lot may fail to meet the requirements of standard sizing.
[34 FR 13909, Aug. 30, 1969; 34 FR 14325, Sept. 12, 1969. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 66 FR 48788, Sept. 24, 2001]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B Watson & Taylor, Ltd. 3
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               0000759726
<NAME>              P-B Watson & Taylor, Ltd. 3

<MULTIPLIER>        1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Sep-30-1997

<PERIOD-START>                  Oct-01-1996

<PERIOD-END>                    Jun-30-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos

<CASH>                          1,136,614

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,136,614

<PP&E>                          275,000

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,411,614

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           229,136

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      1,182,478

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,411,614

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0<F1>

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0<F1>

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    0<F1>

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0<F1>

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
<FN>
<F1>
Registrant adopted the liquidation basis of accounting 
on October 1, 1996, and, accordingly, does not reflect
Statement of Operations subsequent to 1996. See Note A
to the financial statements for further details.
</FN>


</TABLE>
USDA Rural Utilities Service Directory

*(Updated May 19, 1997)*

*The purpose of this directory is to provide a point of contact for RUS program-related inquiries.  Those listed represent branch chief-level personnel and above.
Any other inquiries about RUS employees can be directed to (202) 720-8565, Rural Development Headquarters Personnel Services Division.

*(All phone numbers listed begin with area code 202)*

OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR

Beyer, Wally B.*
36.512 Cleaning up.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-12, Cleaning Up, in solicitations and

contracts when a fixed-price construction contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or

removal of improvements contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed

the simplified acquisition threshold. The contracting officer may insert the clause in solicitations and

contracts when a fixed-price construction or a fixed-price contract for dismantling, demolition, or

removal of improvements is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to be at or below the

simplified acquisition threshold.

Parent topic: Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:94-cr-01037-MP-1

JENNIFER ANN STRICKLAND, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on the government’s Application for Writ of Continuing

Garnishment, filed on October 24, 2012. (Doc. 24) Having examined the Application, the Court

finds the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 3205(b)(1) have been met. Accordingly, the Clerk of

Court is hereby directed to issue the appropriate Writ of Continuing Garnishment.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of October, 2012

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
§ 58.22 When appeal inspection or grading may be requested. ( a ) An application for an appeal inspection or grading may be made by any interested party who is dissatisfied with any determination stated in any inspection or grading certificate or report if the identity of the samples or the product has not been lost; or the conditions under which inspection service was performed have not changed. Such application for appeal inspection or grading shall be made within 2 days following the day on which the service was performed. Upon approval by the Administrator, the time within which an application for an appeal grading may be made may be extended.
( b ) An appeal inspection shall be limited to a review of the sampling procedure and in analysis of the official sample used, when, as a result of the original inspection, the commodity was found to be contaminated with filthy, putrid, and decomposed material. If it is determined that the sampling procedures were improper, a new sample shall be obtained.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jessie C. SIMMONS et ux., Defendants.

No. CIV-4-80-13.

United States District Court, E. D. Tennessee, Winchester Division.

Dec. 18, 1980.

John H. Cary, U. S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn. by John C. Littleton, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chattanooga, Tenn., for plaintiff.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NEESE, District Judge.

The plaintiff moved the Court for a judgment by default herein. Rule 55(b)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. “ * * * [N]o judgment by default shall be entered against an infant or incompetent person unless represented in the action by a general guardian, committee, conservator, or other such representative who has appeared therein. * ♦ * ” *Idem.*“ ♦ ♦ * In any action or proceeding commenced in any court, if there shall be a default of any appearance by the defendant, the plaintiff, before entering judgment shall file in the court an affidavit setting forth facts showing that the defendant is not in the military service. * * * ” 50 U.S.C.App. § 520(1).

An assistant United States attorney filed an affidavit that no person having a right or possible claim of right herein is in the military service. It makes no reference specifically to whether either “defendant” is in the military service, as required by the afore-quoted Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940, *supra;*it alludes only to “ * * * the affiant’s best information and belief * * ♦ ” and sets forth no facts * “ * * * showing that the defendant is not in the military service * * *,” as also required by such statute; and it contains not the slightest hint as to upon what fact(s) the affiant’s stated “ * ♦ * best information and belief * * * ” were acquired.

As was said by our Court of Appeals in a different context: “ * * * [T]he Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act means exactly what is says * * *." *Ray v. Porter,*C.A.6th (1972), 464 F.2d 452, 456. Therefore, the application of the plaintiff for entry of a *553judgment by default herein cannot be granted on the present record.

*

Where facts must be set forth, an affidavit made upon information and belief is insufficient. *Automatic R. Mfg. Co. v. Hazeltine Research*(1950), 339 U.S. 827, 831, 70 S.Ct. 894, 896, 94 L.Ed. 1312, 1317 (headnote 2), (stating the rule with respect to affidavits submitted under Rule 56(e)), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
52.214-15 Period for Acceptance of Bids.

As prescribed in 14.201-6(i), insert the following provision:

Period for Acceptance of Bids (Apr 1984)

In compliance with the solicitation, the bidder agrees, if this bid is accepted within ______ calendar

days (60 calendar days unless a different period is inserted by the bidder) from the date specified in

the solicitation for receipt of bids, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are bid at the price

set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the

Schedule.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.214 [Reserved]
§ 51.2646 U.S. No. 1. “U.S. No. 1” consists of sweet cherries which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Similar varietal characteristics;
( b ) Mature;
( c ) Fairly well colored;
( d ) Well formed; and
( e ) Clean.
( f ) Free from: ( 1 ) Decay;
( 2 ) Insect larvae or holes caused by them;
( 3 ) Soft, overripe or shriveled;
( 4 ) Undeveloped doubles; and,
( 5 ) Sunscald.
( g ) Free from damage by any other cause. (See § 51.2655.)
( h ) *Size.* Unless otherwise specified, the minimum diameter of each cherry shall be not less than three-fourths inch. The maximum diameter of the cherries in any lot may be specified in accordance with the facts.
( i ) For tolerances see § 51.2648.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Keyuan Petrochemiclas, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Chunfeng Tao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.




Date:  August 20,  2012





/s/ Chunfeng Tao


Chunfeng Tao


Chief Executive Officer & Chairman
# 52.222-28 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.222 [Reserved]
SCWC

- 20

- 0000 094

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

CODY SAFADAGO , Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 20

- 0000 094 ; CASE NO. 5CPC

- 17

- 172 )

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner Cody Safadago ’s application for writ of

certiorari filed on April 28 , 20 22 and amended on May 17, 2022 ,

is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ‘ i, June 22, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/ s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-20-0000094 22-JUN-2022 08:01 AM Dkt. 22 ODAC
52.217-7 Option for Increased QuantitySeparately Priced Line Item.

As prescribed in 17.208(e), insert a clause substantially the same as the following:

Option for Increased Quantity-Separately Priced Line Item (Mar 1989)

The Government may require the delivery of the numbered line item, identified in the Schedule as an

option item, in the quantity and at the price stated in the Schedule. The Contracting Officer may

exercise the option by written notice to the Contractor within ______________________ [insert in the

clause the period of time in which the Contracting Officer has to exercise the option]. Delivery of

added items shall continue at the same rate that like items are called for under the contract, unless

the parties otherwise agree.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.217 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:01cr47-SPM

WILLIE JAMES FRANCIS,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL THE GOVERNMENT

TO FILE A SUBSTANTIAL ASSISTANCE MOTION

Pending before the Court is Defendant Willie James Francis’s motion

(doc. 147) to compel the Government to file a substantial assistance motion on

his behalf. To compel the Government to file a substantial assistance motion, a

defendant must first make a threshold showing that the government’s refusal is

based on a constitutionally impermissible motive. Wade v. United States, 504

U.S. 181, 186 (1992). Defendant’s claim that he provided substantial assistance

is not sufficient to satisfy the threshold showing. Id. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s motion (doc. 147) is

denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of July, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:01-cr-00047-MCR-AK Document 158 Filed 07/06/05 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# Date and Time:

Thursday, December 2, 2010, at 10 a.m.

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# Status:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# Items To Be Discussed:

 

Proposed Final Audit Report on Biden for President, Inc.

Proposed Final Audit Report on the Washington State Democratic Central Committee.

Proposed Final Audit Report on the Tennessee Republican Party Federal Election Account.

Proposed Final Audit Report on the Tennessee Democratic Party.

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Commission Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

# Person To Contact For Information:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer; Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-30413 Filed 12-3-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, December 8, 2010; 2 p.m.-3 p.m.

# PLACE: 

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS: 

Closed to the Public.

# Matter To Be Considered:

 

### Compliance Status Report

The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of compliance matters.

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: November 30, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-30486 Filed 12-1-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael G.Staffaroni, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K of Heelys, Inc.;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          [Paragraph omitted inaccordance with Exchange Act Rule 13(a)-14(a)];

(c)           Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

(a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)          Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 15,2007

| By:    |   | /s/ MICHAEL G. STAFFARONI |   |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Michael G. Staffaroni     |   |   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer   |   |   |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Peter J. Donohue, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. We find no reversible error in this record. This conclusion, we may add, would be the same had the question at page 162 of the transcript of the trial minutes been permitted to remain. We can see no racial implications in the question as read in its context, and a reading of the minutes at pages 180 and 181 clearly shows that defendant’s trial counsel found none. Motion by defendant for an order vacating judgment of conviction and granting a new trial unanimously denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, Stevens, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.
§ 500.7 Intoxicating beverages and narcotics. ( a ) Entering USNA property or the operation of a motor vehicle thereon, by a person under the influence of intoxicating beverages or a narcotic drug, is prohibited.
( b ) Except as provided in subpart B of this part, possession of or consumption of intoxicating beverages on USNA property is prohibited.
( c ) The sale of alcoholic beverages on the grounds of the USNA is prohibited.
( d ) The possession of or use of narcotic drugs on the grounds of the USNA is prohibited.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                           3,986
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,334
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,500
<INVENTORY>                                    101,408
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,386
<PP&E>                                          79,598
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 349,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,906
<BONDS>                                        166,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,682
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   349,228
<SALES>                                        408,182
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               408,182
<CGS>                                          257,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  257,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,897
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,281
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,281
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>