alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 57

#### Editorial Note:

1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

#### § 57.13 Federal and State cooperation.

The Secretary shall, whenever determined necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Act, authorize the Administrator to cooperate with appropriate State and other governmental agencies in carrying out any provisions of the Egg Products Inspection Act and this part. In carrying out the provisions of the Act and the regulations in this part, the Secretary may conduct such examinations, investigations, and inspections as the Secretary determines practicable through any officer or employee of any such agency commissioned by the Secretary for such purpose. The Secretary shall reimburse the States and other agencies for the services rendered by them stated in the cooperative agreements signed by the Administrator and the duly authorized agent of the State or other agency.

[69 FR 57166, Sept. 24, 2004]
47.103 Transportation Payment and Audit

Regulation.

47.103-1 General.

47.103-2 Contract clause.

Parent topic: Subpart 47.1 - General
52.222-46 Evaluation of Compensation for

Professional Employees.

As prescribed in 22.1103 , insert the following provision:

Evaluation of Compensation for Professional Employees (Feb 1993)

(a) Recompetition of service contracts may in some cases result in lowering the compensation

(salaries and fringe benefits) paid or furnished professional employees. This lowering can be

detrimental in obtaining the quality of professional services needed for adequate contract

performance. It is therefore in the Government’s best interest that professional employees, as

defined in 29 CFR 541, be properly and fairly compensated. As part of their proposals, offerors will

submit a total compensation plan setting forth salaries and fringe benefits proposed for the

professional employees who will work under the contract. The Government will evaluate the plan to

assure that it reflects a sound management approach and understanding of the contract

requirements. This evaluation will include an assessment of the offeror’s ability to provide

uninterrupted high-quality work. The professional compensation proposed will be considered in

terms of its impact upon recruiting and retention, its realism, and its consistency with a total plan

for compensation. Supporting information will include data, such as recognized national and

regional compensation surveys and studies of professional, public and private organizations, used in

establishing the total compensation structure.

(b) The compensation levels proposed should reflect a clear understanding of work to be performed

and should indicate the capability of the proposed compensation structure to obtain and keep

suitably qualified personnel to meet mission objectives. The salary rates or ranges must take into

account differences in skills, the complexity of various disciplines, and professional job difficulty.

Additionally, proposals envisioning compensation levels lower than those of predecessor contractors

for the same work will be evaluated on the basis of maintaining program continuity, uninterrupted

high-quality work, and availability of required competent professional service employees. Offerors

are cautioned that lowered compensation for essentially the same professional work may indicate

lack of sound management judgment and lack of understanding of the requirement.

(c) The Government is concerned with the quality and stability of the work force to be employed on

this contract. Professional compensation that is unrealistically low or not in reasonable relationship

to the various job categories, since it may impair the Contractor’s ability to attract and retain

competent professional service employees, may be viewed as evidence of failure to comprehend the

complexity of the contract requirements.

(d) Failure to comply with these provisions may constitute sufficient cause to justify rejection of a

proposal.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
52.203-4 [Reserved]

Parent topic: 52.203 [Reserved]
52.211-11 Liquidated Damages-Supplies, Services, or Research and Development.       As prescribed in 11.503(a), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts:          Liquidated Damages-Supplies, Services, or Research and Development (Sept 2000)                                       (a) 						            If the Contractor fails to deliver the supplies or perform the services within the time specified in this contract, the Contractor shall, in place of actual damages, pay to the Government liquidated damages of $__________ per calendar day of delay [*Contracting Officer insert amount*].                                          (b) 						            If the Government terminates this contract in whole or in part under the Default-Fixed-Price Supply and Service clause, the Contractor is liable for liquidated damages accruing until the Government reasonably obtains delivery or performance of similar supplies or services. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause.                                          (c) 						            The Contractor will not be charged with liquidated damages when the delay in delivery or performance is beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor as defined in the Default-Fixed-Price Supply and Service clause in this contract.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.211 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JASON BAEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5591/MCR/EMT

OFFICER DANIELS, et al.,

Defendant.

__________________________/

ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Order 

Directing Transport to Ophthalmologist for Independent Medical Evaluation (ECF 

No. 93). Plaintiff seeks an order directing the Florida Department of Corrections to 

transport Plaintiff to a specific ophthalmologist in Jacksonville, Florida, for a 

medical evaluation on September 7, 2021, and to permit Plaintiff to be unshackled 

to the extent necessary for the evaluation (see ECF No. 93). Plaintiff states he will 

bear all reasonable costs associated with the transportation, including the necessary 

costs of transportation and security (see id.). Plaintiff’s counsel states they have 

conferred with counsel for all Defendants, and no one opposes the motion (see ECF 

No. 93 at 1; ECF No. 95).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Case 3:20-cv-05591-MCR-EMT Document 96 Filed 08/09/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cv5591/MCR/EMT

1. Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Order Directing Transport to 

Ophthalmologist for Independent Medical Evaluation (ECF No. 93) is GRANTED.

2. On September 7, 2021, the Florida Department of Corrections must 

transport JASON BAEZ, DOC# 169800, to: 

Kenneth Dean Rappaport, M.D.

First Coast Retina Center, PA

8833 Perimeter Park Blvd, Ste 203

Jacksonville, FL 32216-1111

3. Plaintiff must bear all reasonable costs associated with the 

transportation, including the necessary costs of transportation and security.

4. Jason Baez must be unshackled to the extent necessary for his 

evaluation by Dr. Rappaport.

5. The clerk of court is directed to email a copy of this order to Stephanie 

Neel at Stephanie.Neel@fdc.myflorida.com. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of August 2021.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05591-MCR-EMT Document 96 Filed 08/09/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Green Planet Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
  1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 Date:   July 18, 2011By:
/s/ Edmond, L. LonerganName:  Edmond, L. LonerganTitle:  Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Green Planet Group, Inc. and will be retained by Green Planet Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2015066EN.01002101.xml

| 11.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 66/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 66/21

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2014/265/CFSP of 12 May 2014 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 137 of 12 May 2014
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 137 of 12 May 2014

On page 10, Article 2:

for:

‘Article 2

The persons and entities listed in the Annex to this Decision shall be added to the list set out in the Annex to Decision 2014/145/CFSP.’

,

read:

‘Article 2

The Annex to Decision 2014/145/CFSP is amended as follows:

| (a) | the heading “Persons” is inserted after the existing heading “List of persons, entities and bodies referred to in Articles 1 and 2”; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the heading “Persons” is inserted after the existing heading “List of persons, entities and bodies referred to in Articles 1 and 2”;

| (b) | after the existing list of persons, the heading of a new Section entitled “Entities” is inserted; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

after the existing list of persons, the heading of a new Section entitled “Entities” is inserted;

| (c) | the persons and entities listed in the Annex to this Decision shall be added to the relevant Section of the Annex to Decision 2014/145/CFSP.’ |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the persons and entities listed in the Annex to this Decision shall be added to the relevant Section of the Annex to Decision 2014/145/CFSP.’

.

---
52.215-14 Integrity of Unit Prices.       As prescribed in 15.408(f)(1), insert the following clause:          Integrity of Unit Prices (Nov 2021)                                       (a) Any proposal submitted for the negotiation of prices for items of supplies shall distribute costs within contracts on a basis that ensures that unit prices are in proportion to the items’ base cost (*e.g.,* manufacturing or acquisition costs). Any method of distributing costs to line items that distorts unit prices shall not be used. For example, distributing costs equally among line items is not acceptable except when there is little or no variation in base cost. Nothing in this paragraph requires submission of certified cost or pricing data not otherwise required by law or regulation.                                          (b) When requested by the Contracting Officer, the Offeror/Contractor shall also identify those supplies that it will not manufacture or to which it will not contribute significant value.                                          (c) The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, less paragraph (b) of this clause, in all subcontracts for other than: acquisitions at or below the simplified acquisition threshold, as defined in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 2.101 on the date of subcontract award; construction or architect-engineer services under FAR part  36; utility services under FAR part  41; services where supplies are not required; commercial products and commercial services; and petroleum products.                                 (End of clause)          *Alternate I*                (Oct 1997). As prescribed in 15.408(f)(2), substitute the following paragraph (b) for paragraph (b) of the basic clause:             (b) The Offeror/Contractor shall also identify those supplies that it will not manufacture or to which it will not contribute significant value.    **Parent topic:** 52.215 [Reserved]
46.804 [Reserved]

Parent topic: Subpart 46.8 - Contractor Liability for Loss of or Damage to Property of the

Government
156 So.2d 475

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Henry KING v. Frank H. LANGRIDGE, District Attorney, et al.

No. 46938.

Oct. 2, 1963.

In re: Henry King applying for writ of mandamus.

Writ denied. The showing made by relator is not sufficient to justify this Court exercising its supervisory jurisdiction.
#### § 503.4 Conformity with Plum Island regulations.

Persons in and on PIADC shall at all times comply with official signs of a prohibitory or directory nature and with the directions of law enforcement or other authorized officials.
Exhibit 10.3

                  HSBC INDICATIVE SUMMARY TERMS AND CONDITIONS

This Summary sets out indicative terms and conditions for banking facilities and
is subject to HSBC Bank plc (the Bank) formal credit approval upon completion of
the due diligence process. It is intended to outline the terms on which the Bank
expects to be able, at its option, to offer such facilities. Any such facilities
will additionally be subject to satisfactory completion of all documentation
required by the Bank.

These terms are not meant to be exhaustive and the facility agreement will
contain other terms and conditions. The terms may also need to be revised, as
further information becomes available or market conditions change.

This does not constitute a binding offer of commitment.

Confidentiality

These Indicative Summary Terms and Conditions are confidential and are not to be
disclosed to or relied upon by any other person.

Description of Facility
Facility          Term Loan
Borrower          Propalms Ltd
Amount            (pound)150,000
Term              10 years
Repayments        Monthly capital & interest
Interest Margin   2.2% above HSBC Base Rate
Arrangement Fee   1.25%
Prepayment Fee    No early repayment penalty
Security Personal Guarantee for (pound)75k from Directors
         (pound)75k of cash funds secured against facility

Preconditions:
To be completed, to the Bank's satisfaction, prior to drawdown of the loan
facility:
Evidence of satisfactory insurance cover in place;
Compliance with Bank's account opening and money laundering regulations;
All security to be completed prior to drawdown;
Appropriate Life cover to be agreed with the Bank and arranged through HSBC
Independent Financial Advisor;
Interest rate hedging in place for min (pound)150k and 5 years term to be
arranged through HSBC Treasury Department;

Covenants & Undertakings

All professional fees and reasonable out of pocket expenses incurred by the Bank
in setting up the facilities are for the account of the borrower.
§ 58.523 Laboratory and quality control tests. ( a ) Quality control tests shall be made on samples as often as necessary to determine the shelf-life and stability of the finished product. Routine analyses shall be made on raw materials and finished product to assure satisfactory composition, shelf-life and stability.
( b ) *Frequency of sampling* — ( 1 ) *Microbiological.* Samples of raw milk for testing shall be taken as prescribed in § 58.135. Representative samples shall be taken of finished cottage cheese and from each lot or batch of product used as an ingredient. For keeping quality tests representative samples shall be taken of finished cottage cheese;
( 2 ) *Chemical* — ( i ) *Milkfat and Moisture.* Representative samples shall be taken of cottage cheese; dry cottage cheese shall be tested for moisture only.
( ii ) *pH.* Representative samples shall be taken of finished cottage cheese.
( c ) *Test methods* — ( 1 ) *Microbiological.* Microbiological determinations shall be made for coliform, psychrotrophic and yeasts and molds. These tests shall be made in accordance with the methods described in the latest edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, published by the American Public Health Association.
( 2 ) *Chemical.* Chemical analysis shall be made in accordance with the methods described in the latest edition of Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, published by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, the latest edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, or by other methods giving equivalent results.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary   information   extracted  from  the  financial
statements of the September 30, 1996 Form 10-Q of Integrated  Resources American
Leasing  Investors  VII-A and is  qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,921,373
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,614
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,051,987
<PP&E>                                       2,427,315
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,884,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,348,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,854,341
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     494,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,348,736
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               366,128
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               339,183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,421,090
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,421,090
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,421,090
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 457.103 [Reserved]
§ 51.2720 Minor defects. *Minor defects* means that the peanut kernel is not damaged but is affected by one or more of the following: ( a ) Skin discoloration which is dark brown, dark gray, dark blue or black and covers more than one-fourth of the surface;
( b ) Flesh discoloration which is darker than a light yellow color or consists of more than a slight yellow pitting of the flesh;
( c ) Sprout extending more than one-eighth of an inch from the tip of the kernel; and,
( d ) Dirt when the surface of the kernel is distinctly dirty, and its appearance is materially affected.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

HEWITT A. GRANT, II and

JEROME BOYNTON,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-307-RV-MJF

MARK INCH, et al.,

Defendants.

/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated November 17, 2020 (ECF No. 5). Plaintiffs were

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and were afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed, and I have determined that the Report and 

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice to each Plaintiff filing a 

new individual complaint on his own behalf, and either paying the full $400.00 fee 

Case 5:20-cv-00307-RV-MJF Document 6 Filed 12/18/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

($350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee) or submitting an individual 

application to proceed in forma pauperis.

3. The clerk of the court shall close this case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of December, 2020.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00307-RV-MJF Document 6 Filed 12/18/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 550.122 Vesting of title.

Title to equipment and supplies and other tangible personal property will vest in the Cooperator as described in 2 CFR 200.313 and 200.314, unless otherwise specified in the award. (7 U.S.C. 3318(d))
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 5:95cr5015LAC

SERGIO GONZALEZ

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on June 20, 2007

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION CONCERNING RULE 35(b) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 6/8/2007 Doc.# 532

RESPONSES:

BY GOVERNMENT on6/29/07 Doc.# 533

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 2nd day of

July, 2007, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) The Court has no authority to accept defendant’s cooperation or to file a

Rule 35. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 5:95-cr-05015-LC Document 534 Filed 07/02/07 Page 1 of 1