alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv6017/MCR/EMT

ZHONGSHAN FENGYE ELECTRICAL

APPLIANCES CO., LTD., agent of 

Techwood,

Defendant.

/

ORDER

The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 

31, 2021 (ECF No. 25). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There are no timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, the 

undersigned has determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

And in addition to the lack of opposition to the motion, as found by the Chief 

Magistrate Judge, the Court has reviewed the record and finds Plaintiff has shown 

(1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) that Plaintiff will suffer 

irreparable injury absent an injunction; (3) that the threatened injury to the Plaintiff 

outweighs whatever damage the proposed injunction may cause the Defendant; and 

Case 3:20-cv-06017-MCR-EMT Document 26 Filed 09/29/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cv6017/MCR/EMT

(4) that “if issued, the injunction would not be adverse to the public interest.” Siegel 

v. LePore, 234 F.3d 1163, 1176 (11th Cir. 2000). 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

25) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, ECF No. 3, is

GRANTED pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(H).

3. Plaintiff is required to file a proposed order within fourteen days of 

entry of this order which is consistent with and incorporates the relief requested in 

Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of September 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-06017-MCR-EMT Document 26 Filed 09/29/21 Page 2 of 2
§ 634.3 Administration. At the national level, the Secretary of Agriculture, with the concurrence of the Administrator, EPA, administers RCWP. The Secretary of Agiculture has delegated responsibility for administration of the program (43 FR 8252) to the Administrator, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). NRCS will be assisted by other USDA agencies in accordance with existing authorities. ( a ) A National Rural Clean Water Coordinating Committee (NRCWCC), chaired by the Administrator, NRCS, is to assist in carrying out the Rural Clean Water Program.
( b ) At the State level, a State Rural Clean Water Coordinating Committee (SRCWCC) is to assist the State Conservationist, NRCS, in administering the program. The State Conservationist will chair the SRCWCC.
( c ) To assure coordination at the project level, a local Rural Clean Water Coordinating Committee is to be established at the time the application is developed. An existing local committee may be used, where practicable, to perform the functions of this committee.
( d ) The Administrator, NRCS, through the State Conservationists, NRCS, is to enter into agreements, where practicable, with soil conservation districts, State soil and water conservation agencies, or State water quality agencies to administer all or part of the program for a project area. That portion of program administration to be conducted by these agencies will be defined in the project application and grant agreement. Where this is not practicable, USDA will administer the program in a project area. In those instances where USDA retains administration of the program in a project area, NRCS will enter into agreements for the transfer of funds to the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (ASCS) for the administration of part of the program.
#### § 58.648 Microbiological requirements for ice cream.

The finished product shall contain not more than 50,000 bacteria per gram as determined by the standard plate count, and shall contain not more than 10 coliform organisms per gram for plain and not more than 20 coliform per gram in chocolate, fruit, nut or other flavors in three out of five samples.
#### § 58.32 Superseded certificates or reports.

When any inspection or grading certificate or report is superseded in accordance with this part, such certificate or report shall become null and void and, after the effective time of the supersedure, shall no longer represent the class, grade, quality, quantity, or condition described therein. If the original and all copies of such superseded certificate or report are not returned to the inspector or grader issuing the reinspection or regrading or appeal inspection or grading certificate or report, the inspector or grader shall notify such persons as he considers necessary to prevent fraudulent use of the superseded certificate or report.
Subpart 26.3 - Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions    **Parent topic:** Part 26 - Other Socioeconomic Programs26.300 Scope of subpart.       (a) 						            This subpart implements Executive Order12928 of September 16,1994, which promotes participation of Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Minority Institutions (MIs) in Federal procurement.                                          (b) 						            This subpart does not pertain to contracts performed entirely outside the United States and its outlying areas.26.301 [Reserved]26.302 General policy.       It is the policy of the Government to promote participation of HBCUs and MIs in Federal procurement.26.303 Data collection and reporting requirements.       Executive Order12928 requires periodic reporting to the President on the progress of departments and agencies in complying with the laws and requirements mentioned in the Executive order.26.304 Solicitation provision.       Insert the provision at 52.226-2, Historically Black College or University and Minority Institution Representation, in solicitations exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, for research, studies, supplies, or services of the type normally acquired from higher educational institutions.
52.207-6 Solicitation of Offers from Small

Business Concerns and Small Business

Teaming Arrangements or Joint Ventures

(Multiple-Award Contracts).

As prescribed in 7.107-6 , insert the following provision:

Solicitation of Offers from Small Business Concerns and Small Business Teaming Arrangements or

Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award Contracts) (Dec 2022)

(a) Definition. "Small Business Teaming Arrangement," as used in this provision-

(1) Means an arrangement where–

(i) Two or more small business concerns have formed a joint venture; or

(ii) A small business offeror agrees with one or more other small business concerns to have them act

as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract. A Small Business Teaming

Arrangement between the offeror and its small business subcontractor(s) exists through a written

agreement between the parties that–

(A) Is specifically referred to as a "Small Business Teaming Arrangement"; and

(B) Sets forth the different responsibilities, roles, and percentages (or other allocations) of work as it

relates to the acquisition;

(2)

(i) For civilian agencies, may include two business concerns in a mentor-protégé relationship when

both the mentor and the protégé are small or the protégé is small and the concerns have received an

exception to affiliation pursuant to 13 CFR 121.103(h)(3)(ii) or (iii).

(ii) For DoD, may include two business concerns in a mentor-protégé relationship in the Department

of Defense Pilot Mentor-Protégé Program (see section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act

for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 4901 note prec.)) when both the mentor and the

protégé are small. There is no exception to joint venture size affiliation for offers received from

teaming arrangements under the Department of Defense Pilot Mentor-Protégé Program; and

(3) See 13 CFR 121.103(b)(9) regarding the exception to affiliation for offers received from Small

Business Teaming Arrangements in the case of a solicitation of offers for a bundled contract with a

reserve.

(b) The Government is soliciting and will consider offers from any responsible source, including

responsible small business concerns and offers from Small Business Teaming Arrangements or joint

ventures of small business concerns.

(End of provision)
Parent topic: 52.207 [Reserved]
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATE OF PERSON PERFORMING
FUNCTIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I, Dexter R. Yager, Sr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Yager/Kuester
Public Fund Limited Partnership; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers
disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: March 24, 2004 /s/ Dexter R. Yager, Sr.Dexter R. Yager, Sr., General Partner ofDRY Limited Partnership,
the General Partner of Registrant
| Date: August 12, 2009       |   | /s/ Wayne E. Ahart                              |
|-----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Name:   Wayne E. Ahart                                                                                                                                                            |
|                        |   | Titles:   Chairman of the Board of Directors and  Chief Executive Officer                                                                                               |
|                        |   |                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Date: August 12, 2009  |   | /s/ Barry N. Shamas                             |
|                        |   | Name:  Barry N. Shamas                                                                                                                                                                 |
|                        |   | Titles:  Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer                                                                                            |

----
# L_2015093DE.01010301.xml

| 9.4.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 93/103 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 93/103

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 165/2014 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 4. Februar 2014 über Fahrtenschreiber im Straßenverkehr, zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 3821/85 des Rates über das Kontrollgerät im Straßenverkehr und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 561/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zur Harmonisierung bestimmter Sozialvorschriften im Straßenverkehr

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 60 vom 28. Februar 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 60 vom 28. Februar 2014

Auf Seite 17, Artikel 34 Absatz 7 Unterabsatz 2:

anstatt:

„Die Fahrer brauchen die Angaben nach Artikel 1 Unterabsatz 1 nicht zu machen, ...“

muss es heißen:

„Die Fahrer brauchen die Angaben nach Unterabsatz 1 Satz 1 nicht zu machen, ...“.

Auf Seite 17, Artikel 35 Absatz 2 Buchstabe a Ziffer ii:

anstatt:

| „ii) | die in Artikel 34 Nummer 5 Buchstabe b Ziffern ii, iii und iv genannten Zeiten eintragen,“ |
| --- | --- |

„ii)

die in Artikel 34 Nummer 5 Buchstabe b Ziffern ii, iii und iv genannten Zeiten eintragen,“

muss es heißen:

| „ii) | die in Artikel 34 Absatz 5 Buchstabe b Ziffern ii, iii und iv genannten Zeiten eintragen,“ |
| --- | --- |

„ii)

die in Artikel 34 Absatz 5 Buchstabe b Ziffern ii, iii und iv genannten Zeiten eintragen,“

.

---
Case 5:99-cv-00060-SPM Document 20 Filed 11/04/99 Page 1 of 6
Case 5:99-cv-00060-SPM Document 20 Filed 11/04/99 Page 2 of 6
Case 5:99-cv-00060-SPM Document 20 Filed 11/04/99 Page 3 of 6
Case 5:99-cv-00060-SPM Document 20 Filed 11/04/99 Page 4 of 6
Case 5:99-cv-00060-SPM Document 20 Filed 11/04/99 Page 5 of 6
Case 5:99-cv-00060-SPM Document 20 Filed 11/04/99 Page 6 of 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           5

<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1,000

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                      JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                       2,153
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                6,285
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 2,074
<INVENTORY>                                                    340
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             7,819
<PP&E>                                                      13,815
<DEPRECIATION>                                              12,402
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              18,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       10,309
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                  1,680
<COMMON>                                                       123
<OTHER-SE>                                                     150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                18,404
<SALES>                                                      6,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             6,839
<CGS>                                                        1,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                1,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             6,269
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (1,358)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    42
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (1,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (1,400)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (0.12)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

FRANKLIN C. SMITH,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:21cv30-MW/MAF

NANCY PELOSI &

FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATIONS,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 5, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s objections 

to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 6. This Court liberally construes 

Plaintiff’s objections as a request for leave to amend his complaint. Ordinarily, leave 

should be freely granted when a more carefully drafted complaint might state a 

claim. But this Court is not required to grant leave when amendment would be futile. 

See Gary v. U.S. Government, 540 F. App’x 916, 917-18 (11th Cir. 2013). Here, 

amendment would be futile as Plaintiff’s allegations—that Nancy Pelosi and the FBI 

willfully and sadistically fabricated charges against Michael Flynn, that U.S. District 

Court Judge Sullivan convicted Mr. Flynn to “cripple the integrity of our armed 

forces,” and that this caused irreparable “psychological damage to Plaintiff and the 

Case 4:21-cv-00030-MW-MAF Document 7 Filed 02/05/21 Page 1 of 2
American people,” in addition to Plaintiff’s apologetics for the breach of the U.S. 

Capitol on January 6, 2021—are irrational and incredible. Allowing Plaintiff to file 

an amended complaint would not fix this defect. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiff’s

objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, 

“Plaintiff’s complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of 

standing, improper venue, and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be 

granted.” The Clerk shall also close the file. 

SO ORDERED on February 5, 2021.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:21-cv-00030-MW-MAF Document 7 Filed 02/05/21 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Howard A. Levine, as District Attorney of Schenectady County, on Behalf of the May 1968 Grand Jury of Schenectady County, Respondent, v. Sam De Cesare, Also Known as Smeraldo De Cesare, Appellant. In the Matter of Smeraldo De Cesare, Petitioner, v. Robert G. Main, as Justice of the Supreme Court, Respondent.

Decisions denying applications for assignment of counsel to prosecute appeal and to prosecute a proceeding pursuant to CPLR, article 78, rescinded. The issue of appellant-petitioner’s indigence referred to Honorable Ellis J. Staley, Jr., Associate Justice, to hear and report on the facts, the time and place of the hearing to be fixed in the order to be entered hereon. Notice of the hearing shall be given by the Clerk to the County Attorney of Schenectady County, in accordance with CPLR 1101, and to the chairman of the Committee on Legal Aid of the Schenectady County Bar Association, by service on them by mail of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, together with copies of the relevant affidavits on file in the clerk’s office. Subpoenas for attendance of witnesses may be issued pursuant to CPLR 2302. The affidavit of the District Attorney, filed in opposition to the applications for assignment of counsel, raises sharp issues- of fact with respect to the genuineness of appellant-petitioner’s claim of indigence, asserting, among other things, that although appellant-petitioner asserts that he does not own property in excess of the sum of $100, he is in fact the beneficial owner of property which has been held in the names of others for the purpose of avoiding claims of creditors. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

PHYNERRIAN Q. MANNING,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:03CV304-SPM/AK

MICHELLE CLOWER, et al,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

An Order of this Court was recently returned as undeliverable. (Doc. 23). A

search of the website for federal prisoners shows that Plaintiff has moved to another

facility in Kentucky. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the Court advised of his

current address and a failure to do so may result in a recommendation that this

cause be dismissed. The Clerk of Court shall mail to Plaintiff a copy of this Order, as

well as a copy of the previous Order, which was returned, (doc. 22), and update the

docket to reflect his current address as:

Phynerrian Q. Manning

USP McCreary

330 Federal Way

Pine Knot, KY 42635

DONE AND ORDERED at Gainesville, Florida, this 30th day of June, 2005.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:03-cv-00304-SPM-AK Document 24 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 1
# 52.223 [Reserved]

- 52.223-1 Biobased Product Certification. 
- 52.223-2 Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction Contracts. 
- 52.223-3 Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data. 
- 52.223-4 Recovered Material Certification. 
- 52.223-5 Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information. 
- 52.223-6 Drug-Free Workplace. 
- 52.223-7 Notice of Radioactive Materials. 
- 52.223-8 [Reserved] 
- 52.223-9 Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material Content for EPA-Designated Items. 
- 52.223-10 Waste Reduction Program. 
- 52.223-11 Ozone-Depleting Substances and High Global Warming Potential Hydrofluorocarbons. 
- 52.223-12 Maintenance, Service, Repair, or Disposal of Refrigeration Equipment and Air Conditioners. 
- 52.223-13 Acquisition of EPEAT®–Registered Imaging Equipment. 
- 52.223-14 Acquisition of EPEAT®-Registered Televisions. 
- 52.223-15 Energy Efficiency in Energy-Consuming Products. 
- 52.223-16 Acquisition of EPEAT®-Registered Personal Computer Products. 
- 52.223-17 Affirmative Procurement of EPA-designated Items in Service and Construction Contracts. 
- 52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving. 
- 52.223-19 Compliance with Environmental Management Systems. 
- 52.223-20 Aerosols. 
- 52.223-21 Foams. 
- 52.223-22 Public Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Reduction Goals-Representation. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses