alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bond Laboratories, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Wilson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By /s/ John Wilson


John Wilson


Chief Executive Officer, President


April 15, 2011
#### § 51.313 Overripe.

*“Overripe”* means apples which have progressed beyond the stage of ripe, with flesh very mealy or soft, and past commercial utility.
#### McWEENEY, Respondent, v. WHALE CREEK IRON WORKS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Action by Mary BIcWeeney, as administratrix, etc., against the Whale Creek Iron Works.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 5:99cr15-SPM

FELIPE GUERRA JAIMES,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS AND CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on three documents filed by

Defendant Felipe Guerra Jaimes:

Doc. 16991 File Motion for New Trial and Motion to Alter or Amend the

Judgment and or Alternative Motion to Amend for Making

Additional Findings Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59, 52(b). and

Rule 58(a)

Doc. 1700 File Judg Disqualification Motion and Nunc Pro Tunc Notice

of Appeal and Stay the Execution Order

Doc. 1701 Motion to Spand the Record and Amend Notice of Appeal

and to Consolidate Appeals Motion Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.

Rule 12(b)(2)(3), and (B). and Rule 7(a) (b).

The documents are incomprehensible and Defendant has not

1

 The motion appears to be the same as doc. 1698, except the

attachments are different. The clerk of court has treated doc. 199 as an

amended version of doc. 1698.
Page 2 of 2

demonstrated an entitlement to relief. Defendant should stop filing motions

challenging his conviction and sentence because the time to do so, either

through direct appeal or a 2255 motion, has long since expired. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Defendant’s requests for relief (docs. 1699, 1700, 1701) are

denied.

2. No certificate of appealability (doc. 1702) will be issued because

Defendant has failed to make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional

right.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of August, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

 CASE NO. 5:99cr15-SPM
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:01cr47-SPM

ROBERT HALL,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO MODIFY UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion (doc. 39) to

reduce his sentence under the retroactive crack cocaine amendment

(Amendment 750) and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Government filed a response in

opposition (doc. 41).

Upon review, the Court finds that Defendant is not entitled to a sentence

reduction because application of the guideline amendment results in no change

to his sentencing range. Defendant is subject to the Career Offender

enhancement, which results in an offense level of 37 and a guideline range of

360 months to life imprisonment. Because of the enhancement, Defendant’s

sentencing range remains the same under the amended guidelines, and he is not

eligible for a reduction. See United States v. Moore, 541 F.3d 1323, 1327-28

Case 4:01-cr-00047-MW-CAS Document 249 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

(11th Cir. 2009); United States v. Hankerson, 224 Fed. App’x 900 (11th Cir.

2007). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that motion (doc. 39) to reduce sentence is

denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of January, 2012.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:01cr47-SPM

Case 4:01-cr-00047-MW-CAS Document 249 Filed 01/06/12 Page 2 of 2
exv10w1









EXHIBIT 10.1




January 22, 2009



Thomas Phair

[Address]




Dear Tom:



This letter is to confirm your compensation for your role as Vice President, Treasurer & Principal
Accounting & Financial Officer with Altus. Your base salary is $200,000. In addition to your base
salary, you will have an opportunity to earn an annual bonus of up to 25% based on achieving
mutually established performance objectives as detailed in the Pay for Performance Plan.



In addition, your compensation will include Stock Options to purchase 250,000 shares of Altus
common stock. Stock options will vest quarterly over a four-year schedule, in accordance with plan
documents, so long as you remain an employee. Your exercise price will be the closing price of our
common stock price as of Tuesday, January 27, 2009. Also, you will be eligible for twelve (12)
months severance, subject to standard tax withholdings and the terms of the severance plan
referenced below.



In the near future, you will receive a plan documents detailing the following:





	•	 	The terms and conditions of the stock option grant including acceleration of stock options
in the event of a merger or acquisition; and
	 
	•	 	The terms and conditions of the Severance and Change in Control Agreement.




Your employment is subject to your continued agreement with Altus’ standard employee Non-Disclosure
and Inventions Agreement. Also please be aware that our relationship is and will always be one of
voluntary employment “At Will”.



Please acknowledge your acceptance of these terms by signing below and returning to me on or before
Friday, January 23, 2009 by 12:00 pm.



I look forward to working with you as we build a new team.



Sincerely,



/s/ Georges Gemayel



Georges Gemayel

President & CEO




	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Thomas J. Phair, Jr.
 

Accepted by: Thomas Phair

	 	1/23/09
 

Date
§ 58.2 Designation of official certificates, memoranda, marks, identifications, and devices for purpose of the Agricultural Marketing Act. Subsection 203(h) of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended by Pub. L. 272, 84th Congress, provides criminal penalties for various specified offenses relating to official certificates, memoranda, marks or identifications, and devices for making such marks or identifications, issued or authorized under section 203 of said Act, and certain misrepresentations concerning the inspection or grading of agricultural products under said section. For the purposes of said subsection and the provisions in this part, the terms listed below shall have the respective meanings specified: ( a ) *Official certificate* means any form of certification, either written or printed (including that prescribed in § 58.18) used under the regulations in this subpart to certify with respect to the inspection of dairy processing plants and the inspection, class, grade, quality, size, quantity, or condition of products (including the compliance of products and packaging material with applicable specifications).
( b ) *Official memorandum* means any initial record of findings made by an authorized person in the process of inspecting, grading, determining compliance, or sampling pursuant to the regulations in this subpart, any processing or plant-operation report made by an authorized person in connection with inspecting, grading, determining compliance, or sampling under the regulations in this subpart, and any report made by an authorized person of services performed pursuant to the regulations in this subpart.
( c ) Official identification or other official marks means any form of identification or mark (including, but not limited to, those in §§ 58.49 through 58.51) approved by the Administrator and authorized to be affixed to any product, or affixed to or printed on the packaging material of any product certifying the inspection, class, grade, quality, size, quantity, or condition of the products (including the compliance of products with applicable specifications) or to maintain the identity of the product for which service is provided under the regulations in this subpart.
( d ) *Official device* means a stamping appliance, branding device, stencil, printed label, or any other mechanically or manually operated tool that is approved by the Administrator for the purpose of applying any official mark or other identification to any product or the packaging material thereof.
EXHIBIT 3.3
CERTIFICATE OFAMENDMENTOFCERTIFICATEOF INCORPORATION****
       The FuriaOrganization, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue ofthe General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBYCERTIFY:
       FIRST: That ata meeting of the Board of Directors of the Furia Organization resolutions wereduly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the *Certificate ofincorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable. Theresolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:
RESOLVED, That the Certificate of Incorporation of thiscorporation be amended by changing  Article 4 (a) thereof so that, as amendedsaid Article shall be and read as follows:
       “Thetotal number of shares the Corporation is authorized to issue is 250,000,000shares,  consisting of 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock having a par value of$.001 per share and  50,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock having a par value of$.0001 per share.”
       SECOND: Thatthereafter, without a meeting of shareholders, holders of Common Sharesrepresenting 79% of the issued and outstanding common Shares of The FuriaOrganization, Inc, by written consent, voted such shares in favor of theamendment
       THIRD: Thatsaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of  Section242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Furia Organization has causedthis certificate to be signed by,  Martin Cohen, its President, this 19thday of August, 2004 .
By: 
/s/ Martin Cohen  
  
Martin Cohen
  
President 
 
****
52.225-14 Inconsistency between English

Version and Translation of Contract.

As prescribed at 25.1103(b), insert the following clause:

Inconsistency Between English Version and Translation of Contract (Feb 2000)

In the event of inconsistency between any terms of this contract and any translation into another

language, the English language meaning shall control.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.225 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1997 for May Limited Partnership 1984-2 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000757385
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1984-2
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                         261
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  92
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               548
<PP&E>                                         10,441
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   590
<SALES>                                        960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               981
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                820
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            820
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   820
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  63.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  63.94
        


</TABLE>
48.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes policies and procedures for using and administering value engineering

techniques in contracts.

Parent topic: Part 48 - Value Engineering
52.247-23 Contractor Liability for Loss of and/or Damage to Household Goods.       As prescribed in 47.207-7(e), insert the following clause:          Contractor Liability for Loss of and/or Damage to Household Goods (Jan 1991)                                       (a) 						            Except when loss and/or damage arise out of causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, the Contractor shall be liable to the owner for the loss of and/or damage to any article while being-                                                         (1) 								                Packed, picked up, loaded, transported, delivered, unloaded, or unpacked;                                                            (2) 								                Stored in transit; or                                                            (3) 								                Serviced (appliances, etc.) by a third person hired by the Contractor to perform the servicing.                                                                             (b) 						            The Contractor shall be liable for loss and/or damage discovered by the owner if written notice of such loss and/or damage is dispatched to the Contractor not later than 75 days following the date of delivery.                                          (c) 						            The Contractor shall indemnify the owner of the goods at a rate of ___ cents per pound per article.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Wednesday, December 8, 2010 at 10 a.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemption 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the item listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, December 8, 2010 will be:

An adjudicatory matter

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: December 1, 2010.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-30628 Filed 12-2-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### GAUSE, Appellant, v. BOLDT et al., Respondents (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 5, 1906.)

Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by Harry T. Gause, on behalf of himself and all other creditors of the Commonwealth Trust Company, against George 0. Boldt and others. From a judgment dismissing the complaint on demurrer, plaintiff appeals. Modified and affirmed. Howard Taylor, for appellant. Charles B. Souther, for respondents Boldt et al. William H. iPain, for respondent Mynderse. York Allen, for respondent Hagemeyer. William M. Bennett, for respondents Hallowell et al. Francis S. Hutchins, for respondent Commopwealth Trust Company.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in Gause v. Boldt (decided herewith) 100 N. Y. Supp. 1117, the judgment appealed from should be modified, by striking therefrom all bills of costs except one, that one to be divided among all defendants whose demurrers were sustained therein, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs in this court.
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-1339

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Nebraska. * Serafin Lopez-Flores, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Antonio Lopez, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 13, 2005 Filed: September 21, 2005

___________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Serafin Lopez-Flores appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 upon him claiming error for overstating his criminal history. He also contends the district court impermissibly relied upon the Sentencing Guidelines and the ultimate sentence was higher than necessary to achieve the sentencing purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (West 2005).-2- Lopez-Flores agreed with the district court’s assessment of his criminal history category under the Guidelines, but asked for a downward departure from that category. (SeeTr. at 5.) The district court was aware of its authority to depart from the Guidelines. (Id . at 7-9, 17.) There being no unconstitutional motive for the lack of departure alleged, the district court’s failure to depart is not reviewable. United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez , 335 F.3d 793, 799 (8th Cir. 2003). Lopez-Flores argues the district court impermissibly relied upon the Sentencing Guidelines in violation of United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). However, the district court made clear it recognized the advisory nature of the Sentencing Guidelines and considered the factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). (Tr. at 19.) Accordingly, the district court committed no Booker error. In light of the offense level, criminal history category, nature and circumstances of the offense, history of Lopez-Flores, and the other factors enumerated in § 3553(a) and United States v. Adams , 401 F.3d 886, 895 (8th Cir. 2005), this Court concludes the sentence imposed by the district court is in all aspects reasonable.
We therefore affirm the district court.

______________________________
#### § 600.6 Field offices.

Each field office is under the direction and supervision of a district conservationist who is responsible for NRCS activities in the geographical area served by the field office. Usually the geographical area of a field office includes one or more conservation districts and one or more counties. Field offices are generally collocated with other USDA agencies in USDA Service Centers.
**BRIEFING ONCIVILRIGHTS ISSUESFACINGMUSLIMS ANDARABAMERICANSIN WISCONSINPOST-SEPTEMBER 11**

**BEFORE THEWISCONSINADVISORY COMMITTEE TOTHE  U.S. COMMISSION ONCIVILRIGHTS**

**MILWAUKEE**
**APRIL11, 2002**

Members of the Wisconsin   Advisory Committee

Executive Summary

Transcript
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CALRISSIAN J. STALLWORTH,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5928-MCR-HTC

BOARD OF COUNTY 

COMMISSIONERS, ALL 

BOARD MEMBERS, 

Defendants.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation dated February 23, 2021. ECF No. 8. The parties have been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections 

thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should 

be adopted.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5928-MCR-HTC

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

(1)The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 8, is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

(2)This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute 

and failure to follow a Court order.

(3)The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of April 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Editorial Note on Part 47
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 64 FR 38108, July 15, 1999.

§ 47.9 The reply. ( a ) *Filing and service.* If the answer asserts a counterclaim or a set-off, the complaining party, within 20 days after service of the answer, may file a reply with the Fruit and Vegetable Programs. A copy of the reply shall be served upon the respondent by the Fruit and Vegetable Programs as provided in § 47.4.
( b ) *Contents.* The reply shall be confined strictly to the matters alleged in the counterclaim or set-off in the answer. It shall contain a precise statement of the facts which constitute the grounds of defense to the counterclaim or set-off, and shall specifically admit, deny, or explain each of the allegations of the counterclaim or set-off, unless the complainant is without knowledge, in which case the reply shall so state; or a statement that the complainant admits all of the allegations of the counterclaim or set-off; or a statement containing an admission of liability in an amount less than that alleged in the counterclaim or set-off and a denial of liability for the remaining amount.
( c ) *Failure to file reply.* Failure to file a reply shall be deemed a waiver of hearing on the counterclaim or set-off and an admission of the allegations contained in the counterclaim or set-off. If no reply is filed, the allegations of the counterclaim or set-off shall be deemed admitted.
[10 FR 2209, Feb. 27, 1945, as amended at 56 FR 174, Jan. 3, 1991; 64 FR 38106, July 15, 1999]