alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 624.5 Coordination. ( a ) If the President declares an area to be a major disaster area, NRCS will provide assistance which will be coordinated with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or its designee. FEMA is the lead federal agency for Presidentially-declared natural disasters.
( b ) When an NRCS State Conservationist determines that a watershed impairment exists, but the President does not declare an area to be a major disaster area, FEMA does not coordinate assistance. In this situation, NRCS will assume the lead, provide assistance, and coordinate work with the appropriate State office of emergency preparedness and other Federal, tribal, or local agencies involved with emergency activities, as appropriate.
( c ) In the case where the watershed impairment exists solely on FS System lands, the FS will determine the existence of the impairment, assume the lead, provide assistance and coordinate work with the appropriate State office of emergency preparedness and other Federal, tribal, or local agencies involved with emergency activities, as appropriate.
Exhibit 10.16




October 1, 2009





Mr. Elorian Landers


30 Farrell Ridge Drive


Sugar Land, TX 77479





Re:           Amendment No. 1 to the Consulting Agreement by and between Bond Laboratories and Elorian Landers





Dear Mr. Landers:





Reference is made to that certain agreement by and between Bond Laboratories, Inc. (“Bond” or the “Company”) and Elorian Landers (“Consultant”) dated June 1, 2009 (the "Agreement"). This letter (this “Amendment”) supplements and amends certain of the terms contained in the Agreement.





WHEREAS, the Company and Consultant desire to amend certain provisions of the Agreement as described herein;





NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:





1.
Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used, but not defined, herein shall have the same meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.




2.
Fees for Services. The second paragraph of Section 3 of the Agreement shall be replaced in its entirety with the following:




“Commencing October 1, 2009, the Company shall pay Consultant a fee of $5,000 per month (the “Monthly Retainer”) on or around the fifteenth (15th) day of each month during the term of the Agreement. In addition to the Monthly Retainer, Consultant may be entitled to receive an additional bonus (a “Discretionary Bonus”) in connection with the fulfillment of his duties and responsibilities under the Agreement to the extent that such activities result in direct and tangible economic benefit(s) to the Company. The amount and timing of any Discretionary Bonus payment(s) shall be determined in good faith based upon discussions between Consultant and the Board of Directors of the Company during the term of the Agreement. All Monthly Retainer and Discretionary Bonus amounts payable to Consultant by the Company shall be in cash or shares of the Company’s Common Stock (or any combination thereof) at the discretion of Consultant. For the purposes of the Agreement as amended by this Amendment, the per share value of any Common Stock of the Company issued as consideration for the Monthly Retainer or Discretionary Bonus shall equal the 5-Day Volume Weighted Average Price of the Company’s Common Stock, as reported by Bloomberg or other such nationally recognized provider of financial markets data, as of the payment date of such consideration.




This Amendment amends and modifies the Agreement, which remains in full force and effect as to matters not discussed herein. In the case of any inconsistency or conflict between the provisions of this Amendment and the provisions of the Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall govern.





Please confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth our agreement by signing and returning to the Company the enclosed duplicate copy of this Amendment.





Very truly yours,





BOND LABORATORIES, INC.











By:           /s/ John Wilson


Name:           John Wilson


Title:           Chief Executive Officer





Accepted and agreed to as of


the date first written above:





CONSULTANT











By:           /s/ Elorian Landers


Name:            Elorian Landers
#### In re SCHMID.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 5, 1906.)

In the matter of the application by Anton Schmid for the revocation of letters of administration issued to Johanna Ug on the goods, chattels, and credits of Louise SprathoS, deceased.

No opinion. Motion for a preference denied.
Page 1 of 2

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

NICOLE BOVE ́,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:03cv312-LC/WCS

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated May 9, 2001. The parties have been furnished a copy of the

report and recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made a de novo determination

of any portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Case 5:03-cv-00312-LC-WCS Document 22 Filed 06/13/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:99cv159-LAC

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated 

2. Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees, doc. 17 and amended by doc. 18, is

GRANTED and the Commissioner shall certify and pay to Plaintiff’s attorney $3,334.49

as a reasonable fee.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of June, 2005.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER 

Senior United States District Judge

 

Case 5:03-cv-00312-LC-WCS Document 22 Filed 06/13/05 Page 2 of 2
#### § 58.311 Coolers and freezers.

The coolers and freezers shall be equipped with facilities for maintaining proper temperature and humidity conditions, consistent with good commercial practices for the applicable product, to protect the equality and condition of the products during storage or during tempering prior to further processing. Coolers and freezers shall be kept clean, orderly, free from insects, rodents, and mold, and maintained in good repair. They shall be adequately lighted and proper circulation of air shall be maintained at all times. The floors, walls, and ceilings shall be of such construction as to permit thorough cleaning.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE SKANSKA USA CIVIL 

SOUTHEAST INC., AND 

SKANSKA USA, INC., AS OWNERS 

OF THE BARGE KS 5531, 

PRAYING FOR EXONERATION 

FROM LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 

Case No. 3:20-cv-5980-LC-HTC 

________________________________/ 

ORDER 

 Pursuant to the Court’s Discovery Order, at ECF Doc. 1159, the undersigned 

held an initial status conference on discovery on May 26, 2021. As discussed and 

agreed to during that status conference, the undersigned will hold a weekly status 

conference to address unresolved discovery matters each Wednesday, at 10:00 

A.M. CT. As set forth in the Court’s order setting the first conference, counsel and 

client representatives necessary to resolve and address any outstanding discovery 

issues must attend the conference and, generally, must do so in person. Upon 

request, the undersigned will consider telephonic appearances on an attorney by 

attorney and conference by conference basis. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED, 

1. A weekly status conference on discovery will be held each Wednesday 

at 10:00 AM CT, beginning June 2, 2021, in Courtroom 3N, United States 

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1173 Filed 05/27/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20-cv-5980-LC-HTC 

District Court, One North Palafox, Pensacola, FL, until further notice or unless 

otherwise canceled or rescheduled by the Court. 

2. Any party desiring the services of a court reporter will be responsible 

for procuring such services. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of May 2021. 

 /s/ Hope Thai Cannon 

 HOPE THAI CANNON 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1173 Filed 05/27/21 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SEAN D FIELDS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 333 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

and Motions to Supplement the Petition and Motion for Attorney File and Reports are 

DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

## Public Announcement; Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. 94-409) [5 U.S.C. Section 552b]

# DATE AND TIME:

12 a.m., Tuesday, December 7, 2010.

# PLACE:

U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

# STATUS:

Closed.

      ( print page 75699)    

# MATTERS CONSIDERED:

The following matter will be considered during the closed meeting: Consideration of two original jurisdiction cases pursuant to 28 CFR 2.27.

# AGENCY CONTACT:

Patricia W. Moore, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5933.

Dated: November 29, 2010.

Rockne Chickinell,

General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-30340 Filed 12-3-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 3:20cr68-MCR

RYAN K. NOBLE

_____________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of the 

Defendant, Ryan K. Noble, to Counts One and Two of the indictment is hereby 

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 26th day of October 2020.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00068-MCR Document 30 Filed 10/26/20 Page 1 of 1
EX-35 (d)
(logo) CHASE


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


RE: Bank of America Funding 2006-5 Trust (BAFC 2006-5): The Pooling and
Servicing Agreement by and among U.S. Bank, NA as Assignee, Bank of America as
Assignor, CitiMortgage, Inc as Master Servicer (the "Agreement")


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association, as Servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the Bank of America
Funding 2006-5 Trust (BAFC 2006-5) (The "Agreement"), does hereby certify that:


(1)   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year
      ending December 31, 2006 and of the performance of the Servicer under the
      Agreement has been made under my supervision; and


(2)   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
      fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
      throughout such year.


Date: 02/28/2007


JPMorgan Chase Bank,
National Association,
as Servicer


By: /s/ David Lowman
Name: David Lowman
Title: Executive Vice President
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:00cr15 –SPM 

WILLIAM H. BLACK,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant William H. Black’s 

notice of appeal (doc. 1304), which has been construed as a request for

certificate of appealability. For the following reasons, a certificate of appealability

will be denied. 

A defendant seeking a certificate of appealability must make a

“substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c)(2). This standard is met if the defendant can show that reasonable

jurists could differ as to the resolution of the case either on the merits or as to

any plain procedural bar. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 

The coram nobis relief sought by Black is appropriate only in extraordinary
Page 2 of 2

circumstances to correct an error of fundamental character when there is no

other relief available and a valid reason for not pursing relief earlier. Alikhani v.

United States, 200 F.3d 732, 734 (11th Cir. 2000). The restitution issue Black

raises could have been pursued on direct appeal. The claims of ineffective

assistance of counsel could have been pursued in a motion to vacate under §

2255. Black has not presented a sound reason for his failure to pursue these

issues earlier and the issues are not of a fundamental character so as to warrant

coram nobis relief. Reasonable jurists would not differ on the resolution of the

case. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: the request for certificate of appealability

(doc. 1304) is denied. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of August, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 1:00cr15-SPM
# L_2015006DE.01000601.xml

| 10.1.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 6/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 6/6

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 282/2014 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 11. März 2014 über ein drittes Aktionsprogramm der Union im Bereich der Gesundheit (2014-2020) und zur Aufhebung des Beschlusses Nr. 1350/2007/EG

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 86 vom 21. März 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 86 vom 21. März 2014

Auf Seite 8, in Artikel 11 Absatz 2 zweiter Satz:

anstatt:

„Diese Durchführungsrechtsakte werden gemäß dem in Artikel 16 Absatz 2 genannten Prüfverfahren erlassen.“

muss es heißen:

„Diese Durchführungsrechtsakte werden gemäß dem in Artikel 17 Absatz 2 genannten Prüfverfahren erlassen.“

---
47.205 Availability of term contracts and basic ordering agreements for transportation or for transportation-related services.       (a) 						            All Government agencies may contract for transportation or for transportation-related services and execute basic ordering agreements (BOA’s) (see subpart  16.7) unless agency regulations prescribe otherwise. However, it is generally more economical and efficient for most agencies to make use of term contracts and basic ordering agreements that have been executed by agencies that employ personnel experienced in contracting for transportation or for transportation-related services. The Department of Defense (DoD) and the General Services Administration (GSA) contract for transportation or for transportation-related services on behalf of other activities and agencies. For instance, GSA awards term contracts for services such as local drayage, office moves, and ocean-freight forwarding (see 47.105 for assistance).                                          (b) 						            Agencies may obtain transportation or transportation-related services for which the cost does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold if term contracts or basic ordering agreements are not available.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 47.2 - Contracts for Transportation or for Transportation-Related Services
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bond Laboratories, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Abrams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By /s/ Michael Abrams


Michael Abrams


Chief Financial officer


April 15, 2010
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alfonso Dukes, Appellant.

Submitted July 2, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 30 AD3d 682.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Mitch Kessler, Esq., 63 Pike Creek Drive, Cohoes, New York 12047 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Unassociated Document


     

    SHANGHAI
BABY FOX FASHION CO., LTD.

    SUPPLEMENTARY
AGREEMENT TO THE EQUITY SHARE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT

    


    
      	
              Transfer
      Party:

            	
              Ms.
      FENGLING WANG (as Party A in the
following)

            


    

    


    
      	
              Receiver
      Party:

            	
              BABY
      FOX INTERNATIONAL, INC. (as Party B in the following); Registered address:
      East John Street 502, Carson City, Nevada State, The United States of the
      America; Company Legal Representative, HITOSHI YOSHIDA (吉田仁), also
      Chairman of Board of Directors, Nationality: Japan.

               

            


    

    Now
through friendly discussion, regarding Shanghai Baby Fox Fashion Co., Ltd.
equity share acquisition matters, Party A and Party B reached the following
agreement as supplementary provisions to the Equity Share Acquisition Agreement
entered into by Party A and Party B on September 20, 2007:

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              I.

            	
              Party
      B hereby agrees to distribute to Party A the dividend for 2007 Fiscal Year
      in the amount of RMB 3,635,437.18 (approximately 433.735
      USD)  declared in lieu of the shareholder meeting on December
      10, 2007.

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              II.

            	
              This
      Agreement has three (3) original copies. Party A, Party B and Shanghai
      Baby Fox keep one (1) copy each.

            


    

    


    IN WITNESS OF, both parties
signed this Supplementary Agreement below.

    


    
      
        
          	
                  Party
      A :

                	
                  Fengling
      Wang

                
	 
      	
                   

                  /s/ Fengling
      Wang

                
	 
      	
                  Fengling
      Wang

                


        

      

    

    


    
      
        
          	
                  Party B :

                	
                  BABY
      FOX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                  Legal
      Representative :

                   

                
	 
      	
                   /s/
      Hitoshi Yoshida

                
	 
      	
                  吉田仁 HITOSHI
      YOSHIDA
#### § 653.3 Adaptation of technical standards.

Technical standards and criteria developed on a national basis may require special adaptation to meet local needs. These adaptations must be approved by the Administrator of the Natural Resources Conservation Service or his designee.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:01cr33-SPM

MICHAEL LAMAR BROWN,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Reduce

Sentence and Release Defendant from Custody (doc. 81) and the Government’s

response (doc. 82).

Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure prescribes two

circumstances under which a court may correct or reduce a sentence. Under

subsection a, the court may correct a sentence for clear error within 7 days of

imposition. Notwithstanding the fact that Defendant’s motion is untimely under

subsection a, the provision “is not intended . . . for the court to simply change its

mind about the appropriateness of the sentence.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 advisory

committee’s notes (1991).

Under subsection b, the court may reduce a sentence upon the

government’s filing of a substantial assistance motion. No substantial assistance

Case 4:01-cr-00033-MW-CAS Document 85 Filed 06/21/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

CASE NO.: 4:01cr33-SPM

motion has been filed in this case. 

The Court does not have jurisdiction to reduce Defendant’s sentence. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s Motion to Reduce

Sentence and Release Defendant from Custody (doc. 81) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of June, 2007.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:01-cr-00033-MW-CAS Document 85 Filed 06/21/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Hager, 7:20cv91459

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

ORDER

Plaintiff James Allen Hager’s case was transferred from the 3M 

administrative docket to the 3M MDL docket on May 21, 2020. Accordingly, 

pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 22, Mr. Hager was required to file a Notice of 

Designated Forum on his individual docket and pay a filing fee by June 1, 2020. See

Case No. 3:19md2885, ECF No. 898. To date, neither of these requirements has

been met. Therefore, Mr. Hager is hereby directed to file the requisite notice and 

pay the appropriate filing fee by June 15, 2020. Failure to comply with this directive 

will be grounds for dismissal.

SO ORDERED, on this 8th day of June, 2020.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-91459-MCR-GRJ Document 4 Filed 06/08/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      32.1




**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350**




I,
      Olivia
      Ruiz, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Anasazi Capital Corp. (the
“Corporation”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:




1.
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Corporation for the period July 17, 2006
      (inception) through December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




2.
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





Date:
      March 12, 2007





By: /s/
      Olivia Ruiz





Olivia
      Ruiz


President,
      Secretary and Treasurer


(Principal
      Accounting Officer)