alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
46.302 Fixed-price supply contracts.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.246-2, Inspection of Supplies-Fixed-Price, in

solicitations and contracts for supplies, or services that involve the furnishing of supplies, when a

fixed-price contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed the simplified

acquisition threshold. The contracting officer may insert the clause in such solicitations and

contracts when the contract amount is expected to be at or below the simplified acquisition

threshold and inclusion of the clause is in the Government’s interest. If a fixed-price incentive

contract is contemplated, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its AlternateI. If a fixedceiling-price contract with retroactive price redetermination is contemplated, the contracting officer

shall use the clause with its AlternateII.

Parent topic: Subpart 46.3 - Contract Clauses
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Adult EducationAdult StudentsChildrens LiteratureClassroom TechniquesCultural PluralismEnglish (Second Language)Instructional MaterialsLanguage ProficiencySecond Language Instruction

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
# 25.301-3 Weapons.

The *contracting officer**shall* follow agency procedures and the weapons policy established by the *combatant commander* or the *chief of mission* when authorizing contractor personnel to carry weapons (see paragraph (i) of the clause at 52.225-19, Contractor Personnel in a *Designated Operational Area* or *Supporting a Diplomatic or Consular Mission* outside the *United States*).

**Parent topic:**25.301 Contractor personnel in a designated operational area or supporting a diplomatic or consular mission outside the United States.
47.000 Scope of part.

(a) This part prescribes policies and procedures for-

(1) Applying transportation and traffic management considerations in the acquisition of supplies;

and

(2) Acquiring transportation or transportation-related services by contract methods other than bills

of lading, transportation requests, transportation warrants, and similar transportation forms.

Transportation and transportation services can be obtained by acquisition subject to the FAR or by

acquisition under 49 U.S.C. 10721 or 49 U.S.C. 13712. Even though the FAR does not regulate the

acquisition of transportation or transportation-related services when the bill of lading is the

contract, this contract method is widely used and, therefore, relevant guidance on the use of the bill

of lading is provided in this part (see 47.104).

(b) The definitions in this part have been condensed from statutory definitions. In case of

inconsistency between the language of this part and the statutory requirements, the statute shall

prevail.

Parent topic: Part 47 - Transportation
# 52.215-4 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.215 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 47

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 64 FR 38108, July 15, 1999.

#### § 47.46 Provision applicable to all proceedings.

The Secretary may act in the place and stead of an examiner or judge in any proceeding hereunder. When the Secretary so acts, the Hearing Clerk shall transmit the record to the Secretary at the expiration of the period provided for the filing of proposed findings of fact, conclusions and orders, and the Secretary shall thereupon, after due consideration of the record, issue his or her final order in the proceeding: *Provided,* That the Secretary may issue a tentative order in which event the parties shall be afforded an opportunity to file exceptions before the issuance on the final order.

[12 FR 1026, Feb. 13, 1947, as amended at 38 FR 30447, Nov. 5, 1973; 60 FR 8462, Feb. 14, 1995]
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.509 Employment of USDA or SBA officials. ( a ) Without the Agency's prior written approval, for a period of two years after the date of your most recent issuance of Leverage or after the receipt of any assistance as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, whichever is later, you are not permitted to employ, offer employment to, or retain for professional services, any person who: ( 1 ) Served as an officer, attorney, agent, or employee of SBA or USDA within one year before such date; and
( 2 ) In that capacity, occupied a position or engaged in activities which, in SBA's or the Agency's determination, involved discretion with respect to the issuing of Leverage or the granting of such assistance.
( b ) For purposes of this section, “assistance” means financial, contractual, grant, managerial, or other aid, including licensing, certifications, and other eligibility determinations made by USDA or SBA, and any express decision to compromise or defer possible litigation or other adverse action.
[69 FR 32204, June 8, 2004, as amended at 76 FR 80222, Dec. 23, 2011]
30.201 Contract requirements.

Title 48 CFR 9903.201-1 describes the rules for determining whether a proposed contract or

subcontract is exempt from CAS. Negotiated contracts not exempt in accordance with 48 CFR

9903.201-1(b) shall be subject to CAS. A CAS-covered contract may be subject to either full or

modified coverage. The rules for determining whether full or modified coverage applies are in 48

CFR 9903.201-2. 

30.201-1 CAS applicability.

30.201-2 Types of CAS coverage.

30.201-3 Solicitation provisions.

30.201-4 Contract clauses.

30.201-5 Waiver.

30.201-6 Findings.

30.201-7 Cognizant Federal agency responsibilities.

Parent topic: Subpart 30.2 - CAS Program Requirements
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 

### 133054(26) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

### Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133054 COA: 273734 Jackson CC: 05-006863-FH WALTER JAMES KYES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court's April 24, 2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
#### § 51.645 Slightly rough texture.

*Slightly rough texture* means that the skin is not smooth or fairly smooth but is not excessively rough or excessively thick, or materially ridged, grooved or wrinkled.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2650 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2006 

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal courthouse to be constructed in 

Greenville, South Carolina, as the ‘‘Carroll A. Campbell, 

Jr. Federal Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

S 2650 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. CARROLL A. CAMPBELL, JR. FEDERAL COURT2 HOUSE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal courthouse to be 

4 constructed in Greenville, South Carolina, building num5 ber SC0017ZZ, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. Federal Courthouse’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the Federal courthouse referred to in subsection 

10 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Carroll A. 

11 Campbell, Jr. Federal Courthouse. 

Passed the Senate June 27, 2006. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
<page>
                                                           Exhibit 10.3


                    PRINCIPAL BALANCE INCREASE CONFIRMATION


                                                  March 31, 2005


Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
  as Indenture Trustee
625 Marquette Avenue
MAC N9311-161
Minneapolis, Minnesota  55479
Attn:  Corporate Trust Services-Asset Backed Administration

            Re:  Nordstrom Credit Card Master Note Trust
                 Series 2004-1 Asset Backed Variable Funding Notes
                 -------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

   Pursuant to Section 4.09(b) of the Series 2004-1 Indenture Supplement,
dated as of March 1, 2004 (the "Indenture Supplement"), between Nordstrom
Credit Card Master Note Trust (the "Trust") and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as trustee (the "Indenture Trustee") to the Master Indenture,
dated as of April 1, 2002 (the "Master Indenture" and, together with the
Indenture Supplement, the "Indenture"), between the Trust and Wells Fargo
Bank Minnesota, National Association, as trustee, the undersigned hereby
advises the Indenture Trustee that on the Principal Balance Increase Date a
Principal Balance Increase in the aggregate amount of $25,000,000 was made by
Nordstrom Credit, Inc.  Capitalized terms used herein that are not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Indenture.


                                     NORDSTROM CREDIT, INC.,
                                       as Purchaser



                                     By: /s/ Kevin T. Knight
                                         ---------------------
                                     Name:  Kevin T. Knight
                                     Title: President
#### Raymond Giovanniello, Appellant, v Carolina Wholesale Office Machine Company, Inc., Respondent.

[815 NYS2d *738248]

In a putative class action, inter alia, to recover damages for violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 USC § 227), the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty III, J.), dated November 23, 2004, as denied his motion for class certification pursuant to CPLR article 9. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court dated January 31, 2005, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination *(see*CPLR 5517 [b]).

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated November 23, 2004 is dismissed, as the portion of the order appealed from was superseded by the order dated January 31, 2005, made upon re-argument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated January 31, 2005 is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant.

For the reasons set forth in *Rudgayzer & Graft v Cape Canaveral Tour & Travel, Inc.*(22 AD3d 148 [2005]), a class action may not be maintained in this case *(see*CPLR 901 [b]; *Weber v Rainbow Software, Inc.,*21 AD3d 411 [2005]; *Giovanniello v Hispanic Media Group USA, Inc.,*21 AD3d 400 [2005]; *Ganci v Cape Canaveral Tour & Travel, Inc.,*21 AD3d 399 [2005]; *Bonime v Bridge 21, Inc.,*21 AD3d 393 [2005]; *Bonime v Discount Funding Assoc., Inc.,*21 AD3d 393 [2005]). Moreover, since a motion for leave to reargue “does not offer an unsuccessful party, as here, successive opportunities to present arguments not previously advanced” *(Pryor v Commonwealth Land Tit. Ins. Co.,*17 AD3d 434, 436 [2005]), the plaintiffs argument that CPLR 901 (b) does not prohibit maintenance of a class action seeking injunctive relief, which was not presented in the original motion before the Supreme Court, was not properly raised in the motion for leave to reargue *(see Amato v Lord & Taylor, Inc.,*10 AD3d 374, 375 [2004]). Florio, J.P., Luciano, Spolzino and Fisher, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         802,294
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,350
<PP&E>                                       6,756,467
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,667,415)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,906,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          859,357
<BONDS>                                        271,020
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,776,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,906,696
<SALES>                                        504,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               504,568
<CGS>                                          439,053
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  439,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,357
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,158
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,158
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.96<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>97% Limited Partners interest outstanding - 9004.15
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Consolidated
Capital Properties VI 1996 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000755908
<NAME> CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,485
<SECURITIES>                                       306
<RECEIVABLES>                                       15
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          16,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         10,128
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,905
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,512
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,835
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (323)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.78)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 0 2

- 00 765

- CR

Michael Andrew Lankes , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2021573 , HONORABLE FRANK W. BRYAN, JR. , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant

= s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). The

appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed on Appellant

=

s Motion

Filed: February 21, 2003

Do Not Publish
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00163-CR

Jerry VILLARREAL,

Appellant

v.

The State of 

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR10521W 

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED May 15, 2013.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
! "#$%
"&'%
"%("%
)(" 

		*+,,	-./0	1203	 450627+/	4.80

	

9:	;<;<	=>	<<<?<@	A	BCD=EFGGH	=EICJDKLEFI	MN	LFIOCPJ	FGF=DIC=	FPDFILICJFJ	CP=

>QRSTU	VNQW KXYUZIYTXYU	JR[R\N KXYUZIYTXYU	V[RY VSNXTNSRSTU VSNXTNSRSTU	V[RY ]\^_Y

`abcd	efg-dfhfijaf`i `4ci klmnlmomo	pqmnqmp	jh	 	 e`eg`i

a7r	7s	4.80

=t[W_Y	u >QRSTU	=T^Y VYNQWSXRSTU LvY[	V[RY LvY[VYQSNSTU	V[RY =T\WR	>QRSTU =t[W_Y	VSNXTNSRSTU =SR[RSTU

	 	 	 	 		 	 	a7r	7s	4.80

]\^_YN	>XXY[WSU_	TU	=[NY

G[NR	P[wY xSWNR	P[wY V[RY	>NNS_UY^ =\WWYUR	>NNS_UY^	]\^_Y JT\WQY

e`eg`i -bjdycg zl{olmomo	nq{|qk{	4h} ~h

*yd} d`ijye klmnlmomo	mqkzqn	4hi ~h

a7r	7s	4.80

VK=OFD	D>GF	EF>VFIJ	>IF	JKID>GF	=GC=O	xKI	>J=FPVCPH	>>CP	xKI	VFJ=FPVCP	KIVFI

JT\WQY	D[vY	>WYMS[RSTUN	B		YUQtw[W	]CJ		]\NRSQY	CUTWw[RSTUN	JNRYw

Cw[_Y	CQTU	VYSUSRSTUN

j6.2,.,0	7	.,,	+/05/

j3.228	d0.27q	a0r75.52,	.6.2,.,0	7,	7	j750	7s	d075	.	05.2	j8020/

-7s202.,	e7+0q	`,	.6.2,.,0	7	j750	7s	d075	.	05.2	j8020/

VTQYR

V[RY			 ==CJJYPW			

VTQYR

=T^Y			 F=YWRS			 VTQYR	DYR			 KITT			

KIL[_Y			

>QRSTU

xSU[vSY^

V[RY			

JT\WQY			

klmklmomo m --g		 		 -f1fy	-`1cd	gbcca 			 ~h

klmklmomo { -`h4-j		 		 -`h4yjfia 			 ~h

klmklmomo k gfg		 ghh`ig	fggce 		klmnlmomo ~h

		 	¡	¢	£¤	¥¦	§¤¤¢¢

	  ̈©a«¬­	® ̄	°±¬	2¬©3	 ́©μ3« ̄	 ́¶¬· ̧	©1	 ́©μ·«a

o	$	
	» 1⁄4

L[WR

JR[\NL[WR L[WR=T^Y >RRTWUY>RRTWUY

JR[R\N

4cd1⁄2fig

cyc-adfciacd4dfgcg

fi-	3⁄4

ec*ciejia4d`	gc j-af1c

hfa-bcyy3⁄4

-bdfga`4bcd4yjfiaf** hjdfc	jhjaa`¿ j-af1c

a7r	7s	4.80

o	$	
	» 1⁄4

L[WR

JR[\N L[WRL[WR

=T^Y >RRTWUY>RRTWUY

JR[R\N

	 		 	 	a7r	7s	4.80

=GC=O	EFIF	DK	ÀCFÁ	>GG	>À>CG>GF	CB>FJ	KP	DECJ	=>JF

ÂÂÃÄÅÆ	Ç

ÂÂÃÄÅÆ	Ç

ÈÉÊËÌÉË	 È¢	 ÉÍÉ	 ÎË	ÏÐ¢¢	 ÑË	 ÒÓ

Ô·Õ3«	Ö×Ø¬

Case 4:20-cv-00405-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 1 of 11
 	

	
		
	



  
! "#$%
"&'%
"%("%
)(" 

		 *+,--,./

01

23+43+5+5*655+ 789:;	<=8>?@	>ABC=9	D,	CEEF:B;9 			 G1

23+43+5+5 - >;H;F0I		 		 0C?1;BI	J2*5K55	>;H;F0I	L*-5M/52 			 G1

/3.53+5+5 5 7>0CA 789:;	>;CEEF:B1;BI	0;>	C91FB	A>9;>	CA+5+5N*5	<>A1

789:;	<OPQR	IA	789:;	9STUSV	QW6UUXYVWT	SV,	5/3.53+5+5

			 G1

ISZ	S[	06YW

\]^_` ab`^ c`bd` efgb`hf_ ijkl^ m^njo` cfjdg^

	 		 	 	 	 	 ISZ	S[	06YW

afgp^`	qrrohgb`hf_ st^k ubhk ahnvhnn^k aj^

HA10=CFBI J255K55 J255K55 J5K55 J5K55

E811ABE	FEE8;9 J*5K55 J*5K55 J5K55 J5K55

ISZ	S[	06YW

qd	uob_

ubwv^_`uob_xa sdk^d^k	qv` ubhk ahnvhnn^k ybob_g^ a^oh_zj^_`

	 	 		 	 	 	

ISZ	S[	06YW

m^n`h`j`hf_

ebn`sdyjnh_^nn{bv^|hdn`_bv^m^n`h`j`hf_xam^n`h`j`hf_}wr^m^n`h`j`hf_qvfj_`qvfj_`ubhkqvfj_`sj`n`b_kh_l

	 		 	 	 	 	 	

ISZ	S[	06YW

~~	

~~	

Case 4:20-cv-00405-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 2 of 11
Case 4:20-cv-00405-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 3 of 11
Case 4:20-cv-00405-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 4 of 11
Case 4:20-cv-00405-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 5 of 11
Case 4:20-cv-00405-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 6 of 11
Case 4:20-cv-00405-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 7 of 11
Case 4:20-cv-00405-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 8 of 11
Case 4:20-cv-00405-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 9 of 11
Case 4:20-cv-00405-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 10 of 11
Case 4:20-cv-00405-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 11 of 11
Exhibit
        33.2
 **REPORT
          ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SEC REGULATION AB SERVICING
          CRITERIA**
 
 MSX
          International, Inc. (MSXI) (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing
          compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006
          through December 31, 2006 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria
          applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB. MSXI
          has
          used the servicing criteria communicated to MSXI by the servicer, Ford
          Motor
          Credit Company ("Ford Credit"). to assess compliance with the applicable
          criteria. Accordingly, servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(i)-(ii) are applicable
          to
          the activities performed by MSXI (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) of
          holding and safeguarding retail installment sale contracts as described
          in
          MSXI's service level agreement with Ford Credit. MSXI has concluded that
          all
          other servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs
          with
          respect to the asset-backed securities transactions covered by this report.
          The
          transactions covered by this report include the asset-backed securities
          transactions involving retail installment sale contracts for which the
          Asserting
          Party served as an Item 1122 party participating in the servicing function,
          that
          were completed on or after January 1, 2006 and that were registered with
          the
          Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933
          (the
“Transactions”).
 
 The
          Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
          Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting
          Party has
          complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
          as of
          December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Transactions
          taken as a whole.
 
 Grant
          Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
          an
          attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable
          Servicing
          Criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period as set forth
          in
          this assertion.
 
 
 MSX
          International, Inc.
 
 
 
 By:        /s/
          Frederick K. Minturn Frederick
          K. Minturn
  Title: 
          Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 Date:
          March 15, 2007
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:98-cr-00036-MP

 

JAMES WILLIAM VANRIPER,

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 127, Sealed Motion to Advance Revocation

Hearing, filed by James William Vanriper. The government does not oppose the motion. The

motion is granted, and the revocation hearing is hereby reset for January 31, 2007, at 2:30 p.m. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of January, 2007

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:98-cr-00036-MP Document 129 Filed 01/22/07 Page 1 of 1