alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
52.226-4 Notice of Disaster or Emergency

Area Set-Aside.

As prescribed in 26.206(b), insert the following clause:

Notice of Disaster or Emergency Area set-Aside (Nov 2007)

(a) Set-aside area. Offers are solicited only from businesses residing or primarily doing business in

________________________________________________ [Contracting Officer to fill in with definite

geographic boundaries.] Offers received from other businesses shall not be considered.

(b) This set-aside is in addition to any small business set-aside contained in this contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.226 [Reserved]
37.113-2 Solicitation provision and contract clause.       (a) 						            Use the provision at 52.237-8, Restriction on Severance Payments to Foreign Nationals, in all solicitations that meet the criteria in 37.113-1(a), except for those excluded by 37.113-1(c).                                          (b) 						            When the head of an agency has granted a waiver pursuant to 37.113-1, use the clause at 52.237-9, Waiver of Limitation on Severance Payments to Foreign Nationals.    **Parent topic:** 37.113 Severance payments to foreign nationals.
# L_2014351EN.01000901.xml

| 9.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 351/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 351/9

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

of 4 December 2014

appointing the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Assistant Supervisor

(2014/886/EU)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (1), and in particular Article 42(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of a list of candidates drawn up by the European Commission on 16 September 2014, in accordance with Article 42(1) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, following a public call for candidates, with a view to the appointment of the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Assistant Supervisor,

Whereas:

| (1) | The term of office of the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Assistant Supervisor came to an end on 16 January 2014. However, in accordance with Article 42(6) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Assistant Supervisor remain in office until they are replaced. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The term of office of the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Assistant Supervisor came to an end on 16 January 2014. However, in accordance with Article 42(6) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Assistant Supervisor remain in office until they are replaced.

| (2) | The European Data Protection Supervisor and the Assistant Supervisor are to be appointed by common accord between the European Parliament and the Council, for a period of five years from 4 December 2014, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The European Data Protection Supervisor and the Assistant Supervisor are to be appointed by common accord between the European Parliament and the Council, for a period of five years from 4 December 2014,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are appointed for the period from 4 December 2014 to 5 December 2019:

| — | European Data Protection Supervisor: Mr Giovanni BUTTARELLI, |
| --- | --- |

—

European Data Protection Supervisor: Mr Giovanni BUTTARELLI,

| — | Assistant Supervisor: Mr Wojciech Rafał WIEWIÓROWSKI. |
| --- | --- |

—

Assistant Supervisor: Mr Wojciech Rafał WIEWIÓROWSKI.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 December 2014.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2014.

For the European Parliament

The President

M. SCHULZ

For the Council

The President

S. GOZI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

---
#### § 58.250 Dry whole milk.

Dry whole milk in commercial bulk containers which bears an official identification shall meet the requirements for the U.S. Standards for Grades of Dry Whole Milk. Quality requirements for dry whole milk in consumer packages shall be for U.S. Extra Grade and shall be gas packed with an oxygen content of not more than 2.0 percent.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of The Saint James Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Bruce
Cosgrove,  President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.




                                         /s/ Bruce Cosgrove
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Bruce Cosgrove, President, Chief
                                         Executive Officer & Chief Financial
                                         Officer

Dated: December 14, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 17, 2010.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:

*1. Texas Country Bancshares Inc.,*                     Brady, Texas; to engage                     *de novo*                     through its subsidiary bank, in lending activities pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 29, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-30284 Filed 12-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Kerr, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed and counsel’s motion to withdraw granted (see *People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court—criminal sale controlled substance, third degree.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Schnepp, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:98-cr-00013-MP

PATRICK ALAN LEE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Motion Deeming Restitution Satisfied by USA as to

Patrick Alan Lee, Doc. 131. The United States has requested that this Court deem satisfied Mr.

Lee’s $43,000 obligation to provide restitution to Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. (“Nationwide”). 

Defendant has paid some of the outstanding balance, and Nationwide has offered to settle the

remaining balance in return for a payment of $5,000. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Motion Deeming Restitution Satisfied, Doc. 131, is GRANTED. 

2. Defendant’s obligation to pay restitution to Nationwide, including interest and

penalties, is SATISFIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of June, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
# C_2014148EN.01002501.xml

| 16.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/25

---

Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency for the financial year 2014

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 90 of 28 March 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 90 of 28 March 2014

2014/C 148/07

On page 139, Title 3 and Chapter 3 1 should read as follows:

| ‘3 |
| --- |
| PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE |
| 3 1 | PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE | 548 000 | 840 350 | 1 006 375,00 |
| | Title 3 — Total | 548 000 | 840 350 | 1 006 375,00’. |

‘3

PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE

3 1

PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE

548 000

840 350

1 006 375,00

Title 3 — Total

548 000

840 350

1 006 375,00’.

---
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A0 76 7 . DENI SE QUI NLAN v . CHATTAHOOCHEE POOLS, I NC. et a l

.
Th e Ap p el l an t ’ s M o t i o n Fo r Perm i s s i o n To W i t h draw fi l ed i n t h e ab o v e-s t y l ed

cas e i s h ereb y GRANTED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## January 02, 2018

01/02/2018
#### § 600.7 Specialized field offices.

Other field offices serve specialized activities, such as watershed protection and flood reduction projects, construction projects, resource conservation and development areas, and soil survey activities. State conservationists designate direction and supervision of these offices.
§ 51.2750 U.S. Extra Large Virginia. “U.S. Extra Large Virginia” consists of shelled Virginia type peanut kernels of similar varietal characteristics which are whole and free from foreign material, damage and minor defects, and which will not pass through a screen having 20 ⁄ 64 × 1 inch openings. Unless otherwise specified, the peanuts in any lot shall average not more than 512 per pound. ( a ) In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, the following tolerances, by weight, shall be permitted: ( 1 ) 0.75 percent for other varieties of peanuts;
( 2 ) 3 percent for sound peanuts which are split or broken;
( 3 ) 1 percent for damaged or unshelled peanuts;
( 4 ) 0.75 percent for minor defects: *Provided,* That in addition, any unused part of the tolerance for damaged or unshelled peanuts shall be allowed for minor defects;
( 5 ) 0.1 percent for foreign material; and,
( 6 ) 3 percent for sound, whole peanuts which will pass through the prescribed screen.
§ 54.1015 Official reports, forms, and certificates. ( a ) *Report.* The design review specialist shall prepare, sign, and issue a narrative report covering the observations, comments and recommendations based on the evaluation for conformance with standards of equipment and utensils as provided for in § 54.1005 and indicate the fees and other charges incurred for the services rendered.
( b ) *Forms.* Form DA-161 is the official certificate for equipment or utensils evaluated and is accepted under the regulations. Issuance of this certificate is optional at the request of the applicant.
( c ) *Distribution.* The original report and official certificate (if requested) shall be delivered or mailed to the applicant or other persons designated by the applicant. Other copies shall be forwarded as required by agency, program, and branch instructions. Additional copies will be furnished to any person financially interested in the equipment or utensil involved with the concurrence of the applicant and upon payment of fees, as provided in § 54.1028 and § 54.1029.
3:20-cr-95/MCR-01

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 3:20-cr-95/MCR-01

JEREMY R. HODGE

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. 

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts 1 and 2 of the indictment. 

After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the 

subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined the guilty plea was knowing and 

voluntary and the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact 

containing each of the essential elements thereof. I therefore recommend the plea 

of guilty be accepted and the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence 

imposed accordingly.

Dated: October 28, 2021.

/s/ Hope Thai Cannon HOPE THAI CANNON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Case 3:20-cr-00095-MCR Document 56 Filed 10/28/21 Page 1 of 2
3:20-cr-95/MCR-01

Page 2 of 2

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed 

within twenty-four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different 

deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use 

only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the 

magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a magistrate 

judge's findings or recommendations contained in a report and 

recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 

waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on 

unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir. Rule 

3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Case 3:20-cr-00095-MCR Document 56 Filed 10/28/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 4279.227 Equal Credit Opportunity Act.

In accordance with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1691, *et seq.*), with respect to any aspect of a credit transaction, neither the Lender nor the Agency will discriminate against any applicant on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status or age (providing the applicant has the capacity to contract), or because all or part of the applicant's income derives from a public assistance program, or because the applicant has, in good faith, exercised any right under the Consumer Protection Act. The Lender must comply with the requirements of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act as contained in the Federal Reserve Board's Regulation implementing that Act (see 12 CFR part 202) prior to loan closing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sean S. Dibble, Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 556]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.), rendered February 7, 2005, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant pleaded guilty to rape in the third degree and received a split sentence of five years of probation and six months in jail. He subsequently admitted to violating the terms of his probation. At the time of defendant’s admission, County Court advised him of various sentencing options, but did not commit to any particular one. Thereafter, County Court revoked defendant’s probation and resentenced him to IV2 to 3 years in prison on the rape charge. The clerk subsequently corrected the sentence on the certificate of conviction to indicate that defendant was sentenced to 1 to 3 years in prison. This appeal ensued.*

Defendant correctly asserts that inasmuch as he is not a second felony offender, County Court’s sentence of IV2 to 3 years in prison is illegal and the clerk was without authority to correct it on the certificate of conviction.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed on his conviction of rape in the third degree; matter remitted to the County Court of Franklin County for resentencing; and, as so modified, affirmed.

*

 Notably, the relief which defendant seeks was also available in County Court in a postjudgment motion under CPL 440.20 (1) to set aside the sentence as “unauthorized, illegally imposed or otherwise invalid as a matter of law.” Pursuant to that statute, “an illegal sentence [is] subject to challenge and rectification in the trial court without compelling the defendant to pursue the more lengthy and cumbersome appellate procedure” (Preiser, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 11 A, CPL 440.20, at 11).
# 28.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes requirements for obtaining financial protection against losses under contracts that result from the use of the sealed *bid* or negotiated methods. It covers *bid guarantees*, *bonds*, alternative payment protections, security for *bonds*, and *insurance*.

**Parent topic:**Part 28 - Bonds and Insurance
**Exhibit 35.1**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify toWaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2006 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer, LaSalle Bank,National Association, as Trustee, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee, the following with respect to Washington Mutual Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2006-HE3 Trust for the 2006 fiscal year (the “RelevantYear”):

 

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

                                                                       

                                                                           /s/H. John Berens
| ___________________________________________

Name:  H. John Berens

Title:    Senior Vice President |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT 33.8**

 

January 30, 2008David ZielkeFirst Vice President andAssistant General CounselWashington Mutual1301 Second AvenueSeattle, WA 98001RE: Restated Assessment Reporting Period – January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006Ladies and Gentlemen:Enclosed is a Restated Assessment for the Reporting Period of January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (the " Restated Assessment") of American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (formerly, "SafecoFinancial Institution Solutions, Inc.") the "Asserting Party".The Restated Assessment identifies a material instance of noncompliance with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122 (d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations. Specifically, the Asserting Party did not have, during theapplicable reporting period, sufficient policies and procedures to capture the information with respect to the Platform Transactions necessary to determine compliance with §1122(d)(4)(xii). Please be advised that as of January 1, 2008, the Asserting Party has implemented practices and procedures to capture the information necessary to assess compliance with §1122(d)(4)(xii).Sincerely, /s/ John FroboseJohn FroboseSenior Vice President