alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**




**Certification**




I,
      Terry
      L. McCoy, in my capacity as Executive Vice President of First Horizon Asset
      Securities Inc. (the Depositor) do hereby certify that:





1.    I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
      be
      filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of First
      Horizon Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2006-AR3 (the “Exchange Act periodic
      reports”);





2.    Based
      on
      my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
      contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which
      such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
      by
      this report;





3.    Based
      on
      my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required
      to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included
      in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  Based
      upon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
      under Item 1123 of Regulation AB and except as disclosed in the Exchange
      Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under
      the
      servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5.    All
      of
      the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
      with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
      in
      this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange
      Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
      report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
      of
      noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
      on
      Form 10-K.





In
      giving
      the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
      to me
      by The Bank of New York.





**First
                Horizon Asset Securities Inc., as Depositor**By:
            /s/
                Terry L. McCoyTerry
                L. McCoy,Executive
                Vice President
              (Senior
                Officer of the Depositor in charge of
                Securitization)




Date:
      March 26, 2007
159 So.2d 699

#### I. P. (Pat) COLLIER v. DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR the PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE et al.

No. 47096.

Jan. 27, 1964.

In re: I. P. (Pat) Collier applying for' writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. 159 La.App. 786.

Granted.

HAMITER and HAMLIN, JJ., are of' the opinion that the judgment of the Court: of Appeal is correct.

SANDERS, J.,

is of the opinion that the-judgment of the Court of Appeal approving-a revote in the precinct is correct and in-accordance with the principle of fairness ini elections.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice; SES Performance Review Board.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Performance Review Board.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         This appointment is effective on November 30, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pamela S. Pope, Human Resources Services Division (NAH), National Archives and Records Administration, 9700 Page Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63132, (314) 801-0882.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES Performance Review Boards. The Board shall review the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor and recommend final action to the appointing authority regarding matters related to senior executive performance.

The members of the Performance Review Board for the National Archives and Records Administration are: Adrienne C. Thomas, Deputy Archivist of the United States, Michael J. Kurtz, Assistant Archivist for Records Services—Washington, DC, Thomas E. Mills, Assistant Archivist for Regional Records Services, and Miriam M. Nisbet, Director, Office of Government Information Services. These appointments supersede all previous appointments.

Dated: November 23, 2010.

David S. Ferriero,

Archivist of the United States.

[FR Doc. 2010-30064 Filed 11-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.2****SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     I, Dana C. Russell, Chief Financial Officer of Novell, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), hereby certify that, to my knowledge: (1) The Company’s periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2007 (the “Form10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.* * *CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER     /s/ DANA C. RUSSELL Dana C. Russell    Date: September 7, 2007
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Michael Hill, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gemini Explorations,
      Inc.. for the year ended April 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Gemini Explorations, Inc.                                                             

Dated: August 13, 2009

| | /s/
      Michael Hill                                         
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | Michael Hill                                                   
| | President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary
      Treasurer  
| | and Director                                                   
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer
| | and Principal Accounting Officer)                              
| | Gemini Explorations, Inc.                                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Gemini
Explorations, Inc. and will be retained by Gemini Explorations, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
32.110 Payment of subcontractors under

cost-reimbursement prime contracts.

If the contractor makes financing payments to a subcontractor under a cost-reimbursement prime

contract, the contracting officer should accept the financing payments as reimbursable costs of the

prime contract only under the following conditions:

(a) The payments are made under the criteria in subpart 32.5 for customary progress payments

based on costs, 32.202-1 for commercial product or commercial service purchase financing, or

32.1003 for performance-based payments, as applicable.

(b) If customary progress payments are made, the payments do not exceed the progress payment

rate in 32.501-1, unless unusual progress payments to the subcontractor have been approved in

accordance with 32.501-2.

(c) If customary progress payments are made, the subcontractor complies with the liquidation

principles of 32.503-8, 32.503-9, and 32.503-10.

(d) If performance-based payments are made, the subcontractor complies with the liquidation

principles of 32.1004(d).

(e) The subcontract contains financing payments terms as prescribed in this part.

Parent topic: Subpart 32.1 - Financing for Other Than a Commercial Purchase
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5



       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1993

<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1993

<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         6,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,901)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          151,530
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       177,833
<OTHER-SE>                                     (329,363)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (151,530)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               92
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (92)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (92)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (92)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)
        


</TABLE>
file:////RTIFILE02/...st_Promul/Data_and_Tools/Electroplating/Docket%20-%20RTR/added%209-9/CMP%20Cost%20Quote%20Followup.txt[9/9/2010 1:35:03 PM] From: "Art Brooks" <abrooks@kchservices.com> To: Phil Mulrine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 06/18/2010 11:02 AM Subject: RE: List Priced for Spectras

Hello Phil and Rick I will answer your questions below We are willing to help in any way we can, so if you need additional costing on fans, hoods or duct, stacks etc, let me know

1. These are just the capital costs of just the main control devices, and do not include taxes, install, freight, etc. No ductwork, hoods fan, or stack in included with these costs.

The costs given for these main control devices do include inlet and outlet transitions which are somewhat expensive, but required, and we frequently give discounts of 10% or a little bit more on this equipment in competitive situations. Our pricing may be slightly higher, but we have more knowledge and experience with chrome control device systems, and with our state of the art computer routers the quality of this equipment is second to none.

2. The Spectra U III is a three stage and the U IV is a four stage. We would recommend the U IV for hard chrome plating unless we have physical room to install a "pre-control" mesh pad in the hood or just above the hood. The Spectra U IV gives additional protection to the finer composite mesh pads further down stream if a hood mesh pad or pre-control mesh pad is not physically feasible. Therefore you may want to use the price of the U IV four stage for your cost analysis.

Please call me or email me and I will continue to help with additional information when you need it.

Thank you Art Brooks VP Sales KCH Engineered Systems
# 28.204-4 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.228-14, *Irrevocable Letter of Credit*, in *solicitations* and contracts for services, *supplies*, or *construction*, when a *bid guarantee*, or performance *bonds*, or performance and payment *bonds* are required.

**Parent topic:**28.204 Alternatives in lieu of corporate or individual sureties.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. CASE NO. 1:98CR07MP/AK

HAROLD MITCHELL DEEDRICK,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Pre-Trial Release (Bond)

(doc. 177), as corrected (doc. 178), with documentation in support of same (doc. 181),

and the government’s response. (Doc. 183). Having considered said motion, the court

is of the opinion that it should be DENIED without hearing.

Defendant’s long history of violence, including the state charges underlying the

current violations of supervised release set forth in the Petition before the Court, (doc.

179), clearly establishes Plaintiff as a danger to specific individuals and to the

community. Nothing submitted in conjunction with his medical condition or proposed

treatment addresses or counters this fact. Finally, Defendant is presently being held on

state charges and any decision made by this Court would not result in his immediate

release. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of October, 2009.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Bucyrus International, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.1 
 

 
 BUCYRUS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 
 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 
 Effective April 1, 2009 
 The Board approved an annual cash retainer fee to be paid to our non-employee directors of $55,000, with fees payable in advance on a quarterly basis. The Board also
approved an additional annual cash retainer fee paid to our Chairman of the Board of $10,000, payable in advance on a quarterly basis. The Board approved an annual retainer fee paid to our non-employee directors of $75,000 worth of our Common Stock,
with the stock to be granted at each annual stockholders’ meeting or upon initial election or new appointment to our Board (with a prorated stock grant being made for non-employee directors whose initial election or new appointment occurs on or
after July 1 of any year). Any shares of Common Stock will be issued pursuant to the Omnibus Incentive Plan 2007. 
 Non-employee directors also receive
$1,500 per Board and committee meeting attended. Board committee chairpersons receive an additional fee of $1,000 per committee meeting. We reimburse all directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and
committee meetings. 
 Non-employee directors may elect to receive the annual cash retainer, Board meeting fees and committee meeting fees in the form of
cash or shares of Company stock. 
 Non-employee directors are also eligible to participate in the Bucyrus International, Inc. Nonqualified Non-Employee
Directors Deferred Compensation Program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Prudential-Bache Equitec Real Estate
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               0000757191
<NAME>              Prudential-Bache Equitec Real Estate
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1998

<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1998

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos

<CASH>                          1,803,000

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   1,165,000

<ALLOWANCES>                    500,000

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0

<PP&E>                          52,740,000

<DEPRECIATION>                  23,106,000

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  32,102,000

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           28,520,000

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      3,582,000

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    32,102,000

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                5,752,000

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   4,501,000

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,858,000

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (607,000)

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (8.74)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
#### § 4284.1003 Program administration.

The Agriculture Innovation Demonstration Center program is administered by Cooperative Services within the Agency.
16.302 Cost contracts.

(a) Description. A cost contract is a cost-reimbursement contract in which the contractor receives no

fee.

(b) Application. A cost contract may be appropriate for research and development work, particularly

with nonprofit educational institutions or other nonprofit organizations.

(c) Limitations. See 16.301-3.

Parent topic: Subpart 16.3 - Cost-Reimbursement Contracts
#### LFJ Realty Co., Respondent, v Bank of New York et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[815 NYS2d 231]

In an action to recover damages for negligence, the defendants Bank of New York, individually and as collateral agent for the NYCTL 1996-1 Trust, and NYCTL 1996-1 Trust appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated October 29, 2004, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the plaintiffs claims are not barred by the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel based on this Court’s decision in *NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v LFJ Realty Corp.*(307 AD2d 957 [2003]), since the issue of the appellants’ negligence was not before the Court in that prior action *(see Gutierrez v CNS Recycling,*284 AD2d 497, 498 [2001]).

The appellants failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issues of fact *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Therefore, *748the Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Adams, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1

I, Robert G. Watts, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the Bank as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The Companys other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have;

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90
days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and

c. presented in this annual report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The
Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to
record, process, summarize, and report financial data, and I have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and

6. The Companys other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 21, 2007 |  | /s/ Robert G. Watts, Jr.             
|                     |  | Robert G. Watts, Jr.                 
|                     |  | President and Chief Financial Officer