alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2ND SESSION S. 2332 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to promote and expedite wireless 

broadband deployment in rural and other areas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2006 

Mr. STEVENS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to promote and 

expedite wireless broadband deployment in rural and 

other areas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Broadband 

5 for Communities Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. UNUSED TELEVISION SPECTRUM MADE AVAILABLE 

7 FOR WIRELESS USE. 

8 Part I of title III of the Communications Act of 1934 

9 (47 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

10 the following: 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 2332 IS 

1 ‘‘SEC. 342. UNUSED BROADCAST TELEVISION SPECTRUM 

2 MADE AVAILABLE FOR WIRELESS USE. 

3 ‘‘Any unused broadcast television spectrum in the 

4 band between 72 and 698 megaHertz, inclusive, other 

5 than spectrum in the band between 608 and 614 mega6 Hertz, inclusive, may be used by unlicensed devices, in7 cluding wireless broadband devices.’’. 

8 SEC. 3. FCC TO FACILITATE USE. 

9 Within 180 days after the date of enactment of this 

10 Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall— 

11 (1) adopt minimal technical and device rules in 

12 ET Docket Nos. 02–380 and 04–186 to facilitate 

13 the robust and efficient use of the spectrum made 

14 available under section 342 of the Communications 

15 Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 342) by unlicensed devices, 

16 including wireless broadband devices; and 

17 (2) establish rules and procedures to— 

18 (A) protect incumbent licensed services op19 erating pursuant to their licenses from harmful 

20 interference from such unlicensed devices; 

21 (B) address complaints from licensed 

22 broadcast stations that an unlicensed device 

23 using such spectrum causes harmful inter24 ference that include verification, in the field, of 

25 actual harmful interference; 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•S 2332 IS 

1 (C) require manufacturers of unlicensed 

2 devices designed to be operated in this spectrum 

3 to submit a plan to the Commission to remedy 

4 actual harmful interference to the extent that 

5 harmful interference is found by the Commis6 sion which may include disabling or modifying 

7 the unlicensed device remotely; and 

8 (D) require certification of unlicensed de9 vices designed to be operated in that spectrum 

10 to ensure that they meet the technical criteria 

11 established under paragraph (1) and can per12 form the functions described in subparagraph 

13 (C). 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### § 61.9 Cost of review.

In cases of review of the grade of any official sample of cottonseed, payment covering the costs of re-analysis shall accompany the application.
47.303-5 F.o.b. origin, with differentials.

(a) Explanation of delivery term."F.o.b. origin, with differentials" means-

(1) Free of expense to the Government delivered-

(i) On board the indicated type of conveyance of the carrier (or of the Government, if specified) at a

designated point in the city, county, and State from which the shipments will be made and from

which line-haul transportation service (as distinguished from switching, local drayage, or other

terminal service) will begin;

(ii) To, and placed on, the carrier’s wharf (at shipside, within reach of the ship’s loading tackle, when

the shipping point is within a port area having water transportation service) or the carrier’s freight

station;

(iii) To a U.S. Postal Service facility; or

(iv) If stated in the solicitation, to any Government-designated point located within the same city or

commercial zone as the f.o.b. origin point specified in the contract (the Federal Motor Carrier Safety

Administration prescribes commercial zones at Subpart B of 49 CFR part 372); and

(2) Differentials for mode of transportation, type of vehicle, or place of delivery as indicated in

contractor’s offer may be added to the contract price.

(b) Contractor responsibilities. The contractor’s responsibilities are the same as those listed in

47.303-1(b).

(c) Contract clause. Insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at 52.247-33, F.o.b. Origin, with

Differentials, when it is likely that offerors may include in f.o.b. origin offers a contingency to

compensate for unfavorable routing conditions by the Government at the time of shipment.

Parent topic: 47.303 Standard delivery terms and contract clauses.
37.402 Contracting officer responsibilities.

Contracting officers shall obtain evidence of insurability concerning medical liability insurance from

the apparent successful offeror prior to contract award and shall obtain evidence of insurance

demonstrating the required coverage prior to commencement of performance.

Parent topic: Subpart 37.4 - Nonpersonal Health Care Services
# 52.228 [Reserved]

- 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee. 
- 52.228-2 Additional Bond Security. 
- 52.228-3 Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Defense Base Act). 
- 52.228-4 Workers’ Compensation and War-Hazard Insurance Overseas. 
- 52.228-5 Insurance-Work on a Government Installation. 
- 52.228-6 [Reserved] 
- 52.228-7 Insurance-Liability to Third Persons. 
- 52.228-8 Liability and Insurance-Leased Motor Vehicles. 
- 52.228-9 Cargo Insurance. 
- 52.228-10 Vehicular and General Public Liability Insurance. 
- 52.228-11 Individual Surety—Pledge of Assets. 
- 52.228-12 Prospective Subcontractor Requests for Bonds. 
- 52.228-13 Alternative Payment Protections. 
- 52.228-14 Irrevocable Letter of Credit. 
- 52.228-15 Performance and Payment Bonds-Construction. 
- 52.228-16 Performance and Payment Bonds-Other Than Construction. 
- 52.228-17 Individual Surety—Pledge of Assets (Bid Guarantee). 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
47.104-4 Contract clauses.

(a) In order to ensure the application of 49 U.S.C. 10721 and 1 3712 rates, where authorized (see

47.104(b)), insert the clause at 52.247-1, Commercial Bill of Lading Notations, in solicitations and

contracts when the contracts will be-

(1) Cost-reimbursement contracts, including those that may involve the movement of household

goods (see 47.104-3(b)); or

(2) Fixed-price f.o.b. origin contracts (other than contracts at or below the simplified acquisition

threshold) (see 47.104-2(b) and 47.104-3).

(b) The contracting officer may insert the clause at 52.247-1, Commercial Bill of Lading Notations, in

solicitations and contracts made at or below the simplified acquisition threshold when it is

contemplated that the delivery terms will be f.o.b. origin.

Parent topic: 47.104 Government rate tenders under sections 10721 and 13712 of the Interstate

Commerce Act (49 U.S.C. 10721 and 13712).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Raymond Holley, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 8, 1967, affirmed. In our opinion, there is no merit to appellant’s claim that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel or that his October, 1955 guilty plea was the product of unreasoning fear and coercion. Under all the circumstances, it appears the plea was voluntary and the result of a reasoned decision to avoid the risks incident to a trial on an indictment charging murder in the first degree. There was no denial of due process under the law then existing. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
----

| 1. | The Bank is Trustee under the Trust Agreement. |
|----|------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Trust Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trust. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | A review of the Trustee’s activities during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2015 and of its performance under the Trust Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout such twelve-month period. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ David Duclos |   |
|--------|------------------|--------|
| Name:  | David Duclos     |   |
| Title: | Vice President   |   |

----
#### § 58.731 Closing and sealing containers.

Pouches, liners, or containers having product contact surfaces, after filling shall be folded or closed and sealed in a sanitary manner, preferably by mechanical means, so as to assure against contamination. Each container in addition to other required labeling shall be coded in such a manner as to be easily identified as to date of manufacture by lot or sublot number.
# Subpart 22.20 - [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**Part 22 - Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions
§ 6.20 Introduction. ( a ) Presidential Proclamation 6763 of December 23, 1994, modified the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States affecting the import regime for certain articles of dairy products. The Proclamation terminated quantitative restrictions that had been imposed pursuant to section 22 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, as amended (7 U.S.C. 624); proclaimed tariff-rate quotas for such articles pursuant to Public Law 103-465; and specified which of such articles may be entered only by or for the account of a person to whom a license has been issued by the Secretary of Agriculture.
( b ) Effective January 1, 1995, the prior regime of absolute quotas for certain dairy products was replaced by a system of tariff-rate quotas. The articles subject to licensing under the tariff-rate quotas are listed in Appendices 1, 2, and 3 to be published annually in a notice in the Federal Register. Licenses permit the holder to import specified quantities of the subject articles into the United States at the applicable in-quota rate of duty. If an importer has no license for an article subject to licensing, such importer will, with certain exceptions, be required to pay the applicable over-quota rate of duty.
( c ) The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that this subpart will, to the fullest extent practicable, result in fair and equitable allocation of the right to import articles subject to such tariff-rate quotas. The subpart will also maximize utilization of the tariff-rate quotas for such articles, taking due account of any special factors which may have affected or may be affecting the trade in the articles concerned.
[80 FR 44254, July 27, 2015]
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed October 20, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1592

Lower Tribunal No. F04-3732B

________________

Javon Lee Walker,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. 

Fernandez, Judge.

Javon Lee Walker, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and HENDON, JJ. 

LINDSEY, J.
2

Javon Lee Walker was tried and convicted by a jury of his peers for 

robbery using a deadly weapon in violation of section 812.13(2)(a), Florida

Statutes (2021), and unlawful possession of a firearm or weapon in violation 

of section 790.23(1), Florida Statutes (2021). These convictions were 

affirmed on appeal. Walker v. State, 995 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Walker filed several post-conviction motions before filing the instant 

motion seeking to correct an alleged illegal sentence pursuant Florida Rule

of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The lower court denied this motion in an 

order rendered on May 12, 2021, and entered an order requiring Walker to 

show cause as to “why he should not be held in contempt for such filings.”

The lower court then entered an order on June 30, 2021, imposing 

sanctions and prohibiting Walker from filing any further pro se motions after

finding that Walker’s response failed to establish good cause. Though 

Walker had not responded, the order was entered before the time expired

for Walker to file a response. Hence, Walker was not afforded an opportunity 

to file a response before being barred from future filings.

We affirm without further discussion the lower court’s May 12, 2021

order denying Walker’s motion to correct his sentence but reverse the June 

30, 2021 sanctions order to allow the lower court to rule on Walker’s 

response filed on September 1, 2021, and to determine whether sanctions 
3

are appropriate in accordance with State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48-49

(Fla. 1999). Basic notions of fairness and due process demand nothing less. 

See J.G.G. v. M.S., 312 So. 3d 509, 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (“Procedural 

due process requires that litigants be given proper notice and a full and fair 

opportunity to be heard. To be sufficient, notice must be ‘reasonably 

calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the 

pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their 

objections.’” (quoting De Leon v. Collazo, 178 So. 3d 906, 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2015))).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
legal Nollces 

MARYLAND DePARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT AIR .. RADIATION MANAGEMENT 

ADMINISTRATION 

NOTICE Of PUBLIC HEARING 

The Marv'an.<f Depart- ment of the Environment will hold a public hearing 

concerning: 

(1; a proposed Stata Im- plement.uon P.an (SIP) to meet obHgatione regarding implementation' and en- tQ..rcement under Section U 11 0(a)(2)(A) ? 1M) of the Clean Air Act of the PM 2,5 National Ambient Air Qual- ity Standards (NMOS); and 

~2) Section 8 of the pro- posed plan entithJd "AmbiD~\:is~s~~t~" .M:~i!~ri~~~ proved bV the EI'I\IIironmen- tal Pro~ection Agencv (EPA). will alao aupercede 

~~~w8~~k ~~lirtzv,':i~~i~~rb~~ cember 20. 1979 which we .. approved bV the EPA 

. ~3~uJ!uat 31. 19B1 (46 FR 

1 The public heartng will be held as required bv fed- eral faw (Clean Air Act at 42 U.S.C. 7410 tal and 40 CfR 61.102). After consid- eration of aU comment. re- ceived. the propoted plan Will be submitted to the U,S. EPA for 89proval as part of Maryland I SlP. The proPoied plan doc~ 

um(llnt hal been made 8'V.ilabte on the Maryland Department of the Environ- ment'. web.ite at http:// www.mde~.t.te.md.us/ 

Programsj AirProgramal alf _planninglinde)( .asp 

~y°f;~~~!~neria~~I~~dl~~~ab: used for Internet acea,. to 'IIiaw the document. Copie. of the document can also be viewed at the Maryland Department of the Environroent, Air and 

~~~l:~~:~i~~n,3ooew ~g: tnQton Boulevard, Suite 13('), Baltimore. Maryland, Contact; Oeborah Rabin. Comments: on thi$ pro- posed plan mey be 0) pre~ 

sented at the heating. (2) mailed to Deborah Mebin. 

~1~n~n<i~:~~~!;:;~t~~~a8:: partment of the Envlronlfo"u'l!;'a!:.<fuir.~~~B!~C more. Maryland 21230-

~::~ni~~:~~~~tt:.md.us. 

~H~ ~:~'!n~':.t': !,,0),.~3J; reee~ved not later th,.n Maroh 26. 2006. For more .• . .•.. ' __ 'oct De_ 

10) 537- Maryland 1. •• 1. 

md •. atete.md.u •. the r:::,P~~~~c p~::r:;,,, g: hold on March 26. 2006 II 10 a.m. et the Department of the Envjronment. 1800 

~:::inR~~~ .B~v!~~~~. n1:: ~r~~6-~~Ii~ore. Maryland 

Anyone needing special accommodation I. at the he.rlno ahouid contact the Dep8rtment~1 Fair Pr8cti~ 

as Office at (410) 537- 3964. TTV U&8'1 may con- tact the Depertment through the Ma~ Re-..- ~I5~~rvic. at 1 735-

GEORGE S. ABURN. JR. Director Air " Rld,adon M8nagam~nt 

Admin'atr.tlon 

-t 

:r -IJI 

• !E 

:3 

0 

a: 

(I) 

c 

::I 

n 

0 

:3 

i 

~ 

::I. 

o~ ~ 

",,-

m 

.. " IJI-en ::e -C • OIl! m 

a.c:r !E8. :G 4! = m ""III ~IS! _ IJI :r -< c:r- jJ en I: n a ~ ::e. m • ::I I: z-< :: -<~ 0Q. 

tim _oa. N-t::l ~ NIJI tiZI: .. 8jt :r 01Jla. a 

--t • r-- ~< .. i 00 :r 

0 -2 

-

• :G - ::I 

m 0 ::I 

en 

= C Z &1 • • ! It a: ~ ::I -- ! :3 -

a " • So 11 0 .. a. ,-! -

... ::I Z ~ 0 a. CII "" ::::!. 

• N a. 

::I B • a. 'C: 

~ G:t N i1 

c:r c:r 

if ... 

c :r • - -< a. N 

5' N 

:;t N 0 - 0 

Ii 

n 

- ..,., 

0 - Hi IJI 

• !E r..:' 

:3 

0 

a:
# L_2015157EN.01011201.xml

| 23.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 157/112 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/112

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2014/68/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of pressure equipment

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 189 of 27 June 2014
  )

On page 184, Article 14(7):

for:

‘7.   By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, the competent authorities may, where justified ... in respect of which the procedures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article have not been applied and the use of which is in the interests of experimentation.’,

read:

‘7.   By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 to 6 of this Article, the competent authorities may, where justified ... in respect of which the procedures referred to in paragraphs 1 to 6 of this Article have not been applied and the use of which is in the interests of experimentation’;

on page 200, Article 48(2):

for:

‘2.   Member States shall not impede the making available on the market and/or the putting into service of pressure equipment or assemblies covered by Directive 97/23/EC which are in conformity with that Directive and which were placed on the market before 1 June 2015.’,

read:

‘2.   Member States shall not impede the making available on the market and/or the putting into service of pressure equipment or assemblies covered by Directive 97/23/EC which are in conformity with that Directive and which were placed on the market before 19 July 2016.’.

---
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Citizenship EducationConstitutional HistoryElementary Secondary EducationFederal GovernmentFederal LegislationGovernment RoleGovernmental StructureLegislatorsPolitical IssuesSocial StudiesUnited States Government (Course)United States History

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Annual
      Statement as to Compliance


For
      the
      Year Ended December 31, 2006




**J.P.
      Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust**


***Series
      2006 CIBC 16***




**Pursuant
      to Section 3.13/11.09 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the** **referenced
      transaction, I hereby attest that:**




**i.
      A review of the activities of Capmark Finance Inc. as Master Servicer during** **the
      period, and of its performance under this Pooling and Servicing Agreement,** **has
      been made under my supervision.**




**ii.
      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Capmark Finance Inc.** **as
      Master Servicer, has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under
      this** **Pooling
      and Servicing Agreement throughout the period.**






**Capmark
      Finance Inc.**




/s/
      Mark
      E. McCool




By:     
      Mark E. McCool


Title:  
      Senior Vice President


Date:  
      February 20, 2007








.inv709
      libA






Real
                Estate Finance, Investments, Services
            Capmark
                Finance Inc.
              200
                Witmer Road
              Horsham,
                Pa 19044
Order entered February 28, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00769-CV

LARRY K. ANDERS, Appellant

V.

CROSSFIRST BANK, A KANSAS STATE BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-05551-2018

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s February 25, 2022 unopposed motion to 

extend time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion. We ORDER appellee’s 

brief be filed no later than April 6, 2022.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            2428
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       46
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2474
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               98
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2474
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5610
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4909
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4909
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (422)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4487
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    45.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    45.80
        

</TABLE>