72982 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Notices 

Labor’s Order No. 5–2010 (75 FR 

55355). 

Signed at Washington, DC, on November 

22, 2011. 

David Michaels, 

Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational 

Safety and Health. 

[FR Doc. 2011–30478 Filed 11–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–26–P 

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 

Copyright Office 

[Docket No. 2011–1] 

Cable Statutory License: Specialty 

Station List; Correction 

AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of 

Congress. 

ACTION: Notice of objections and 

specialty station filings; correction. 

SUMMARY: Periodically, the Copyright 

Office (‘‘Office’’) seeks to update its list 

of specialty stations related to the use of 

the cable compulsory license. In 

response to the publication of an initial 

list of specialty stations for this purpose 

in April of this year, the Office received 

objections filed by the Motion Picture 

Association of America to the 

identification of certain stations as being 

entitled to specialty station status in 

accordance with the Federal 

Communications Commission’s (‘‘FCC’’) 

definition of specialty station in effect 

on June 24, 1981. Corrections are being 

made to the specialty station list 

published on November 8, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben 

Golant, Assistant General Counsel, 

Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, 

Southwest Station, Washington, DC 

20024. Telephone: (202) 707–8380. 

Telefax: (202) 707–8366. 

Correction 

The Office corrects the following 

errors in the Notice of Objections 

published in the Federal Register on 

November 8, 2011 at 76 FR 69288: 

• On page 69289, WNYA–CA, 

Albany, NY was misidentified as 

WYNA–CA. 

• On page 69289, W34DI, Port Jervis, 

NY was misidentified as W34d1. 

• On page 69289, W46DQ, Port Jervis, 

NY was misidentified as W42DQ. 

• On page 69289, W42CX, Port Jervis, 

NY was missing from the list as a station 

to which MPAA filed an objection (no 

evidence of construction or the type of 

programming broadcast should not be 

identified as specialty stations) 

Dated: November 21, 2011. 

Maria A. Pallante, 

Register of Copyrights. 

[FR Doc. 2011–30522 Filed 11–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1410–30–P 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

Advisory Panel for Integrative 

Activities, #1373; Notice of Meeting 

In accordance with the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– 

463, as amended), the National Science 

Foundation announces the following 

meeting. 

Name: Ad Hoc Advisory Committee on the 

Merit Review Process (MRPAC). 

Date/Time: December 20, 2011; 12 p.m.– 

4 p.m., EST. 

Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 

Wilson Boulevard, Rm 920, Arlington, VA. 

Type of Meeting: Open. 

Contact Person: Ms. Victoria Fung, 

National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson 

Boulevard, Room 935, Arlington, VA 22230. 

Email: vfung@nsf.gov. 

If you plan to attend the meeting, please 

send an email with your name and affiliation 

to the individual listed above, by the day 

before the meeting, so that a visitor badge can 

be prepared. 

Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice 

concerning issues related to NSF’s merit 

review process. 

Agenda 

• Welcome 

• Update on outreach activities 

• Discussion of potential enhancements to 

the merit review process 

Dated: November 22, 2011. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–30477 Filed 11–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. NRC–2011–0271] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to 

submit an information collection 

request to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) and solicitation of public 

comment. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) invites public 

comment about our intention to request 

the OMB’s approval for renewal of an 

existing information collection that is 

summarized below. We are required to 

publish this notice in the Federal 

Register under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35). 

Information pertaining to the 

requirement to be submitted: 

1. The title of the information 

collection: 10 CFR Part 20, ‘‘Standards 

for Protection Against Radiation.’’ 

2. Current OMB approval number: 

3150–0014. 

3. How often the collection is 

required: Most reports are collected 

annually, but decommissioning reports 

are collected at license termination. 

4. Who is required or asked to report: 

NRC licensees, including those 

requesting license terminations. Types 

of licensees include civilian 

commercial, industrial, academic, and 

medical users of nuclear materials. 

Licenses are issued for, among other 

things, the possession, use, processing, 

handling, and importing and exporting 

of nuclear materials, and for the 

operation of nuclear reactors. 

5. The number of annual respondents: 

3,000. 

6. The number of hours needed 

annually to complete the requirement or 

request: 91,503 hours (5,476 hours 

reporting + 342 hours third-party 

disclosure + 85,685 hours 

recordkeeping). 

7. Abstract: 10 CFR part 20 establishes 

standards for protection against ionizing 

radiation resulting from activities 

conducted under licenses issued by the 

NRC. These standards require the 

establishment of radiation protection 

programs, maintenance of radiation 

protection programs, maintenance of 

radiation records recording of radiation 

received by workers, reporting of 

incidents which could cause exposure 

to radiation, submittal of an annual 

report to NRC of the results of 

individual monitoring, and submittal of 

license termination information. These 

mandatory requirements are needed to 

protect occupationally exposed 

individuals from undue risks of 

excessive exposure to ionizing radiation 

and to protect the health and safety of 

the public. 

Submit, by January 27, 2012, 

comments that address the following 

questions: 

1. Is the proposed collection of 

information necessary for the NRC to 

properly perform its functions? Does the 

information have practical utility? 

2. Is the burden estimate accurate? 

3. Is there a way to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected? 

4. How can the burden of the 

information collection be minimized, 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES