alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Served: October 12, 2011 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 1 2 th of October , 2011 Ninety

- day Notice of Mesaba A viation , Inc., Pinnacle Airlines, Inc., and SkyWest Airlines, Inc., to terminate service at: Muscle Shoals/Florence/Sheffield/

Tuscumbia, Alabama Fort Dodge, Iowa Mason City, Iowa Sioux City, Iowa Waterloo, Iowa Alpena, Michigan Escanaba, Michigan Iron Mountain/Kingsford, Michigan Pellston, Michigan Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan Bemidji, Minnesota Brainerd, Minnesota Chisholm/Hibbing, Minnesota International Falls, Minnesota Thief River Falls, Minnesota Greenvil le, Mississippi Laurel/Hattiesburg, Mississippi Tupelo, Mississippi Butte, Montana Devils Lake, North Dakota Jamestown, North Dakota Aberdeen, South Dakota Watertown, South Dakota under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq . Docket DOT - OST - 2000 - 7856 Docket DOT - OST - 2001 - 10682 Docket DOT - OST - 2001 - 10684 Docket DOT - OST - 2011 - 0131 Docket DOT - OST - 2011 - 0132 Docket DOT - OST - 2009 - 0300 Docket DOT - OST - 2003 - 15128 Docket DOT - OST - 1999 - 5175 Docket DOT - OST - 2011 - 0133 Docket DOT - OST - 2009 - 0303 Docket DOT - OST - 2011 - 0134 Docket DO T - OST - 2011 - 0135 Docket DOT - OST - 2003 - 15796 Docket DOT - OST - 2009 - 0304 Docket DOT - OST - 2001 - 10642 Docket DOT - OST - 2008 - 0209 Docket DOT - OST - 2001 - 10685 Docket DOT - OST - 2009 - 0305 Docket DOT - OST - 2011 - 0136 Docket DOT - OST - 1997 - 2785 Docket DOT - OST - 1997 - 2785 Docket DOT - OST - 2011 - 0137 Docket DOT - OST - 2001 - 10644

NOTICE OF EXTENSIONBy Order 2011

- 9

- 5 the Department requested proposals at the twenty

- three communities shown , with proposals due no later than October 12. By email dated October 11 , Air Choice One requested an extension until October 14. Another carrier orally requested an extension for the same period. W e have decided to grant the carriers’ request s, as the additional amount of time is not unreasonable. All parties must now file c ompetitive pro posals for the twenty

- three communities listed above no later than October 14 , 20 11

.

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.regulations.gov
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bush Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28, 2003 (the "Report") I, Robert L.
Ayres, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Robert L. Ayres

Robert L. Ayres
President,
Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
August 6, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company pursuant
to the Exchange Act and does not constitute a part of the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JAMES MURZIKE,

FDOC Inmate No. L07713,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5958/LAC/EMT

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on April 6,

2021 (ECF No. 10). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

10) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the court.
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with

this order and close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of May, 2021.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 3:20cv5958/LAC/EMT
Exhibit 10.1

Consulting Agreement

Party A:
     Xuezheng YuanParty B:
     Hongtao Shi, Liuyi Zhang and Fred ChangWhereas,1.
     Party A would like register a new company in the Nevada state, file share offering registration to SEC, and toapply for listing at NASD OTCBB market.2.
     Party B are three individuals. They provide project management and language consulting to individuals andcompanies who are lack of English language communication capability, the ability to conduct business in a newenvironment, and lack of business connections and contacts.Hence, Both Party A and Party B have reached an agreement and Party A agrees to retain Party B as its consultants.Both parties reached the following agreements on February 21, 2006:1.
     ServicesParty B will assist Party on a project management work and English to Chinese, Chinese to English consulting.Party B will introduce professional firm and individual including security attorney, US GAAP financial statementaccountant, US GAAP auditor, market maker\investment bank and potential management candidate to Party.Party B will provide office space, free of charge, to Party As new registered company for one year period.Party B will provide language assistance to Party A to engage above mentioned professional services to:Register a Nevada State companyOpen an US bank accountFile registration statement to US SECFile application for trading on OTCBB market2.
     ExpensesParty A is responsible for all the third party expenses incurred.3.
     Compensation: Party A should give Party B 10% of its equity stock of the new registered Nevada statecompany.4.
     SignatureAll documents should be signed by Party A.5.
     LawThis agreement is governed by the law of Peoples Republic of China. If related parties have disagreement, both partiesshould try to discuss and resolve the dispute in a friendly manner.


Party A
XUEZHENG YUANXuezheng YuanNo.5 Suite 4,62-1 Hongshan Rd.Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province China 430000
     Party B
HONGTAO SHIHongtao Shi12B2 Hanwei Plaza, 7 Guang Hua Rd, Beijing 100004, China
LIUYI ZHANGLiuyi Zhang12B2 Hanwei Plaza, 7 Guang Hua Rd, Beijing 100004, China
FRED CHANGFred Chang8626 Quaker Brothers Dr., Ellicott City, MD 21043, USA








---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

 Petitioner

 

 v.

DONALD F. MANCHEL,

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2089 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 57 DB 2014

File No. C1-13-874

Attorney Registration No. 3046

(Philadelphia)

 O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 2

nd day of September, 2014, there having been filed with this 

Court by Donald F. Manchel his verified Statement of Resignation dated August 19,

2014, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of 

Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Donald F. Manchel is accepted; he is 

disbarred on consent from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and he shall 

comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, 

to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
Note: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-1116 

FOREMOST IN PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC. 

(doing business as EnviroCooler), 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

COLD CHAIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

James C. Brooks, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, of Los Angeles, California, 

argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Hope E. Melville and Mark J. 

Shean, of Irvine, California. 

Edward R. Schwartz, Christie, Parker & Hale, LLP, of Pasadena, CA, argued for 

defendant-appellee. 

 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California 

Judge James V. Selna 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-1116 

FOREMOST IN PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC. 

(doing business as EnviroCooler), 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

COLD CHAIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

Judgment 

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL 

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In CASE NO(S). 06-CV-01156. 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (RADER, SCHALL and LINN, Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: August 8, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Exhibit 34.1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company:

We have examined
managements assessment, included in the accompanying Management Assessment, that Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Regulation AB for the Genworth Global Funding Trusts 2005-A, 2006-A, 2006-B, 2006-C, 2006-D, 2006-E, 2006-F, and 2006-G (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1, 2, 3(ii), 3(iii), 3(iv), and 4, which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment about the Companys compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was
conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria specified
above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than
all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were
limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our
tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion,
managements assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated in all material respects.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP      
|                  
|Richmond, Virginia
|March 29, 2007
#### In the Matter of Aaron A. Weinberg et al., Appellants, v. Royal Farms Allied, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 9, 1966, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. No opinion. Appeal from judgment of said court, dated April 25, 1966, dismissed, without costs. That appeal may be deemed abandoned and, in any event, that judgment was superseded by the judgment dated November 9, 1966. Ughetta, Christ and Rabin, JJ., concur; Beldoek, P. J., and Brennan, J., concur in the dismissal of the appeal from the original judgment, but dissent from the affirmance of the judgment dated November 9, 1966, and vote to reverse said judgment insofar as appealed from and to remit the proceeding to the respondent State Liquor Authority for further proceedings consistent with the determination of the Court of Appeals in *Matter of Forman*v. *New York State Liq. Auth.*(17 N Y 2d 224), with the following memorandum: We are of the opinion that as in *Forman,*the record before the Authority fails to disclose how public convenience and *734advantage will be promoted by the issuance of a retail liquor store license to respondent Royal Farms Allied, Inc.
#### § 51.902 Fairly well filled.

*Fairly well filled* means that the berries are reasonably closely spaced on main and lateral stems and that the bunch is not very loose or stringy.

[36 FR 9126, May 20, 1971. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981. Redesignated at 56 FR 15802, Apr. 18, 1991]
#### John H. Knox, Inc., Respondent, v. Continental Casualty Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: When, on August 5, 1965, plaintiff declared its subcontractor Phillips Cooling Tower Company in default and terminated its contract and thereafter treated the materials fabricated by Phillips as Phillips’ property it .thereby rejected such material and title thereto was thereupon revested in Phillips by operation of law (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-401, subd. [4]). Title to the material having revested in Phillips there was no performance by it to be completed and a new contract for the whole job was required. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term in action on performance bond.) Present—Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.
#### Irving S. Lowey & Company, et al., Respondents, v Michael B. Edwards, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on May 28, 1979 unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Blangiardo, J., at Special Term. Respondents shall recover of appellants $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sullivan and Ross, JJ.

Markewich and Silverman, JJ.,

concur in a memorandum by Silverman, J., as follows: I think partners are entitled as of right to an accounting, that being merely the form, in general, of proceeding for determining the rights and liabilities of partners, *inter se,*including both claims of plaintiffs against defendants and defendants against plaintiffs. Usually an interlocutory judgment directing an accounting serves a useful purpose in determining whether there is indeed a partnership or other fiduciary relationship entitling the parties to an accounting. In the present case there is no dispute that there was a partnership. In the circumstances, nothing much would be gained by the declaration of the bare right to an accounting. It also appears that there are some disputes between the parties which will have to be gone into and which arguably may not arise out of the partnership relationship. Accordingly, the problem seems to me to become essentially equivalent to the discretionary determination by the court of the sequence in which issues shall be tried (CPLR 4011), and we would not interfere with that discretion here.
exv10w3









EXHIBIT 10.3




Blue Nile, Inc.




2009 Executive Bonus Plan



STRUCTURE: This 2009 Executive Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) is intended to be an incentive bonus plan.
The Company may, but is not obligated to, pay discretionary bonuses outside the Plan. This Plan is
intended to be exempt from Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code under Treasury Regulation
Section 1.409A-1(b)(4) and will be construed and administered consistently therewith to the
greatest extent possible.



ELIGIBILITY. All executive officers, including the chief executive officer, are eligible for
participation in the Plan, subject to their continued employment throughout fiscal year 2009. No
bonus amounts will be paid under the Plan if an otherwise eligible executive’s employment
terminates prior to December 31, 2009. The Compensation Committee will determine whether newly
hired or promoted executives may be eligible for participation in the Plan, and if so, the
applicable terms of participation (consistent with the terms of this Plan).



ADMINISTRATION. The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. All determinations under
the Plan will be made by the Compensation Committee, whose decisions will be final and binding on
all parties.



PAYMENTS. Any earned bonus will be paid in a single lump sum payment not later than March 15,
2010.



DETERMINATION OF BONUS AMOUNTS.



Bonus Pool. The aggregate bonus pool for fiscal year 2009 is established through the achievement
of the Company’s objectives for Adjusted EBITDA (defined as net income before income taxes, other
income, net, depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation). The target Adjusted EBITDA
shall be determined by the Compensation Committee and communicated to each participant in the Plan.
The bonus pool may be funded from 0% to 200%.



Target Bonus. The Compensation Committee established a target bonus amount for each executive
officer expressed as a percentage of the executive officer’s base salary. The Compensation
Committee may award the executive officer between 0% and 200% of such officer’s bonus target amount
based: (i) fifty percent on the achievement of financial performance objectives, including revenue
growth, earnings per share and free cash flow generation, and (ii) fifty percent on the achievement
of individual performance objectives based on the executive officer’s roles and responsibilities
within the Company. The Compensation Committee shall establish the financial targets and
individual objectives and communicate such targets and objectives to each executive.



Discretion to Reduce or Increase Amounts. The Compensation Committee has the authority, in its
sole discretion, to reduce the value of the bonus (including a reduction to zero) or increase the
value of the bonus otherwise earned under the formula described above, based on any factors it
considers material.
Editorial Note on Part 57
Editorial Note: 1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

§ 57.915 Foreign inspection certification required. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) Except as otherwise provided in § 57.960, each consignment of shell eggs shall be accompanied by a foreign inspection certificate, that, unless otherwise approved by the Administrator contains the following information: ( 1 ) Name of Country exporting product;
( 2 ) City and date where issued;
( 3 ) Quality or description of eggs;
( 4 ) Number of cases and total quantity;
( 5 ) Identification marks on containers;
( 6 ) Name and address of exporter;
( 7 ) Name and address of importer;
( 8 ) A certification that the quality or description of the shell eggs, including date of pack, is true and accurate;
( 9 ) A certification that shell eggs which have been packed into containers destined for the ultimate consumer have, at all times after packing, been stored and transported under refrigeration at an ambient temperature of no greater than 45 °F (7.2 °C); and
( 10 ) Name (including signature) and title of person authorized to issue inspection certificates for shell eggs exported to the United States.
[63 FR 69968, 69971, Dec. 17, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 57168, Sept. 24, 2004]
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**U.S. Bank Trust National Association**

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of U.S. Bank Trust National            Association (the "Trustee"), as Trustee in respect of the STRATS(SM) Trust for News            Corporation Securities, Series 2006-4 (the "Trust"), does hereby certify            that:

| 1.     | The Bank is Trustee under the Trust                            Agreement.                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.     | The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant                            to the Trust Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the                            Trust.                                                                                   |
| 3.     | This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Item 1123                            of the Securities and Exchange Commission's                            Regulation AB.                                                                                               |
| 4.     | A review of the Trustee's activities during the                            twelve-month period ended December 31, 2007 and of its performance                            under the Trust Agreement has been made under my                            supervision.       |
| 5.     | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the                            Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement                            in all material respects throughout such twelve-month                            period. |
|   | IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed                            this Certificate this                            28th day of March 2008.                                                                                                |

             

 

|   |                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    | /s/ Janet                            O'Hara             

                              |
| Name:  | Janet P. O'Hara                                                                                                                                               |
| Title: | Assistant Vice President                                                                                                                                      |

 

 

----
#### § 58.712 Swiss.

Swiss cheese used in the manufacture of pasteurized process cheese and related products should be equivalent to U.S. Grade B or better, except that the cheese may be blind or possess finish characteristics which do not impair the interior quality.