alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on October 29, 2010, Siegfried (USA), Inc., 33 Industrial Park Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Hydromorphinol (9301), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule I.

The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the listed controlled substance in bulk for distribution to its customers for use as reference standards.

Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). 

Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than February 1, 2011.

Dated: November 19, 2010.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-30351 Filed 12-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

The undersigned executive officer of Alliance Bancorp,Inc, of Pennsylvania (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that the Registrant’sForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theRegistrant.

 

 
| Date: March 30, 2010 |   | /s/ Dennis D. Cirucci                 |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Dennis D. Cirucci                     |
|                      |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

Note:                   A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to AllianceBancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Jack L. Messman, Chief Executive Officer of Novell, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby
certify that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



* * *



|                       
|-----------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
|                       
|/s/ JACK L. MESSMAN    
|Jack L. Messman        
|                       
|Date: March 11, 2005
###### Editorial Note on Part 57

#### Editorial Note:

1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

#### § 57.860 Identification wording.

The letters of the identification wording shall be legible and conspicuous.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Case No. 5:03cr1-RH

vs. Case No. 5:04cv174-WS/WCS

KEITH L. SINGLETON, 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER

Defendant filed motions for bond and to expedite, and a request for status. Docs.

97, 98 and 101. A report and recommendation is entered separately addressing

Defendant's amended motion to vacate sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's motion for bond, doc. 97, is DENIED,

Defendant's motion to expedite, doc. 98, is belatedly GRANTED, and the request for

status, doc. 101, is MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED on August 2, 2005.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:03-cr-00001-RH-AK Document 102 Filed 08/02/05 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

vs. Case No. 3:20cr6/TKW

JULIO CESAR AGUILAR-MORENO

_________________________________________________________________

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, and subject to this Court=s 

consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, the plea of 

guilty of the Defendant, JULIO CESAR AGUILAR-MORENO, to the lesser 

included offense of transporting aliens who had entered the U.S. in violation of the 

law, 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 1324 (a)(1)(B)(ii), and is hereby ACCEPTED. 

All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 6th day of March, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 2 Filed 10/28/20 Page 1 of 7
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 2 Filed 10/28/20 Page 2 of 7
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 2 Filed 10/28/20 Page 3 of 7
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 2 Filed 10/28/20 Page 4 of 7
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 2 Filed 10/28/20 Page 5 of 7
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 2 Filed 10/28/20 Page 6 of 7
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 2 Filed 10/28/20 Page 7 of 7
## CAPITA L REGIO N AIRPOR TAUTHORIT Y 

# siimiQ F

Chri s Holma n Chairma n Dic k Bake r Tro y Brow n Victo r Celentin o Tod dCoo k Pau l Hufnage l Roberr F . Selig , AA E Executiv e Directo r February2 , 201 2 ' r- ^

Docke t Managemen t Facilit y U.S
. Department o f Transportation , 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e SE. , Wes t Buildin g Groun d Floor , Roo m W12-140 , Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Su n Countr ySlo t Exemptio n - Docke t Numbe rFAA-2012-008 9 Ladie s an d Gentlemen : Th e Capita l Regio n Airpor t Authorit yfull ysupport s th e Su n CountryAirlines ' reques t fo ra n exemptio n fro m th e slo t limi t fo rRonal d Reaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airpor t (DCA ) se t fort h i n § 93.123(a) , t o permi t th e FAAt o creat e ai rcarrie rslot s durin g certai n limite d hour s fo rSu n Country' s use . Th e propose d ai rcarrie rslot s woul d replac e tw o slo t exemption s unde rDO TOrde r2010-12-1 6 awarde d t o Su n Country , O n January6 , 2012 , th e Unite d State s Court o f Appeal s fo rth e Distric t o f Columbi a Circui t vacate d th e DO TOrder , an d Su n Countrywil l los e it s existin g servic e betwee n DC Aan d Lansing' s Capita l Regio n International Airport
. Specifically , Su n Country desire s on e dail yslo t durin g eac h o f th e 100 0 an d 110 0 hours
. Th e propose d exemptio n woul d permi t Su n Countryt o continu e operatin g it s existin g service s an d avoi d a n inequitabl e resul t o f th e Court's order
. Th e Su n Countryservic e t o Reaga n Washingto n Airpor t (DCA ) ha s ha d a significan t economi cimpac t o n th e Airport
. Averag e passenge rboarding s a t th e Airpor t hav e bee n approximatel y$3,00 0 passenger s pe rmonth
. Accordingly , th e increase d revenu e t o th e Capita l Regio n International Airpor t fro m thi s Su n Countryservic e coul d reac h $700,00 0 pe ryear . I n tur n th e Airpor t Authorit yha s expende d approximatel y$300,00 0 i n marketin g an d advertisin g t o promot e th e ne wservice
. Th e Su n CountryDC Aservic e i s essentia l t o th e economi cgrowt h o fth e Greate r Lansin g Region
. Th e dail yservic e i s th e onl ylarg e aircraf t (737-800 ) servic e t o Washingto n Reaga n Airport , i n th e stat e o f Michiga n outsid e o fDetroit
. Prio rt o Su n Country , th e regiona l communit yha d requeste d th e introductio n o fthi s servic e fro m numerou s othe rairlin e operator s withou t success . Accordingly , i t i s critica l tha t th e FAAtak e th e necessarystep s t o ensur e th e continuatio n o fth e Su n Countryslot s a t th e establishe d fligh t time s i n suppor t o fGreate rLansing' s busines s an d economi c growth
. You rimmediat e approva l o f thi s exemption , s o tha t Su n Countryca n begi n t o ente r flight s schedule s fo rsal e fo rth e balanc e o f 2012 , wil l b e greatl yappreciated
. Sincerely , J , AA E Executiv e Directo r Capita l Regio nInternationa l Airpor t •410 0 Capita l Cit y Blvd . • Lansing , Michiga n4890 6 • 517-321-612 1 • Fa x 517-321-619 7

W W vv.llyluii.sing.co m
52.203-11 Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions.       As prescribed in 3.808(a), insert the following provision:          Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions (Sept 2007)                                       (a)                   *Definitions.* As used in this provision-"Lobbying contact" has the meaning provided at 2 U.S.C. 1602(8). The terms "agency," "influencing or attempting to influence," "officer or employee of an agency," "person," "reasonable compensation," and "regularly employed" are defined in the FAR clause of this solicitation entitled "Limitation on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions" (52.203-12).                                          (b)                   *Prohibition*. The prohibition and exceptions contained in the FAR clause of this solicitation entitled "Limitation on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions" (52.203-12) are hereby incorporated by reference in this provision.                                          (c)                   *Certification*. The offeror, by signing its offer, hereby certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief that no Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress on its behalf in connection with the awarding of this contract.                                          (d)                   *Disclosure*. If any registrants under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 have made a lobbying contact on behalf of the offeror with respect to this contract, the offeror shall complete and submit, with its offer, OMB Standard Form LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities, to provide the name of the registrants. The offeror need not report regularly employed officers or employees of the offeror to whom payments of reasonable compensation were made.                                          (e)                   *Penalty*. Submission of this certification and disclosure is a prerequisite for making or entering into this contract imposed by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Any person who makes an expenditure prohibited under this provision or who fails to file or amend the disclosure required to be filed or amended by this provision, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000, and not more than $100,000, for each such failure.                                 (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.203 [Reserved]
37.115-2 General policy.       (a) 						            Use of uncompensated overtime is not encouraged.                                          (b) 						            When professional or technical services are acquired on the basis of the number of hours to be provided, rather than on the task to be performed, the solicitation shall require offerors to identify uncompensated overtime hours and the uncompensated overtime rate for direct charge Fair Labor Standards Act-exempt personnel included in their proposals and subcontractor proposals. This includes uncompensated overtime hours that are in indirect cost pools for personnel whose regular hours are normally charged direct.                                          (c) 						            Contracting officers must ensure that the use of uncompensated overtime in contracts to acquire services on the basis of the number of hours provided will not degrade the level of technical expertise required to fulfill the Government’s requirements (see 15.305 for competitive negotiations and 15.404-1(d) for cost realism analysis). When acquiring these services, contracting officers must conduct a risk assessment and evaluate, for award on that basis, any proposals received that reflect factors such as-                                                         (1) 								                Unrealistically low labor rates or other costs that may result in quality or service shortfalls; and                                                            (2) 								                Unbalanced distribution of uncompensated overtime among skill levels and its use in key technical positions.                                                                             (d) 						            Whenever there is uncompensated overtime, the adjusted hourly rate (including uncompensated overtime) (see definition at 37.101), rather than the hourly rate, shall be applied to all proposed hours, whether regular or overtime hours.    **Parent topic:** 37.115 Uncompensated overtime.
52.219-4 Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns.       As prescribed in 19.1309(b), insert the following clause:          Notice of Price             Evaluation preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns (Oct             2022)                                       (a)                                      Evaluation preference.                                                         (1)                          Offers will be evaluated by adding a factor of 10 percent to the price of all offers, except-                                                                           (i)                                Offers from HUBZone small business concerns that have not waived the evaluation preference; and                                                                              (ii)                                Otherwise successful offers from small business concerns.                                                                                                           (2)                          The factor of 10 percent shall be applied on a line item basis or to any group of items on which award may be made. Other evaluation factors described in the solicitation shall be applied before application of the factor.                                                            (3)                          When the two highest rated offerors are a HUBZone small business concern and a large business, and the evaluated offer of the HUBZone small business concern is equal to the evaluated offer of the large business after considering the price evaluation preference, award will be made to the HUBZone small business concern.                                                                             (b)                   *Waiver of evaluation preference*. A HUBZone small business concern may elect to waive the evaluation preference, in which case the factor will be added to its offer for evaluation purposes.                □                   Offeror elects to waive the evaluation preference.                                          (c)                   *Joint                         venture.* A HUBZone joint venture agrees that, in the                      performance of the contract, at least 40 percent of the                      aggregate work performed by the joint venture shall be                      completed by the HUBZone small business parties to the                      joint venture. Work performed by the HUBZone small business                      parties to the joint venture must be more than                      administrative                      functions.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.219 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Lucile Levitt, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Herlihy, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which affirmed the decisions of a Referee and the Industrial Commissioner denying benefits to the claimant and imposing a penalty for a willful misrepresentation. The testimony of the claimant established that she accepted employment at three days per week and subsequently left this employment for personal reasons. She initially reported that this employment was a “ tem*970porary assignment ”, but there is no doubt that it was permanent employment and she knew it. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, J.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LOUIS A. WINGARD, III,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-341-AW-MAF

UNKNOWN DEFENDANT,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s Second Report and Recommendation

(ECF No. 12), to which no objections have been filed. I agree with the magistrate 

judge’s conclusions, and the Second Report and Recommendation is incorporated 

into this order. 

Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED 

pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6). The judgment (ECF No. 9) is VACATED. Plaintiff must 

comply with the court’s earlier order (ECF No. 4) within 30 days. The clerk must 

mail that order (and this order) to the Plaintiff at his current address. The clerk will 

also re-open the file.

SO ORDERED on January 14, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00341-AW-MAF Document 13 Filed 01/14/21 Page 1 of 1
22.1007 Requirement to obtain wage

determinations.

The contracting officer shall obtain wage determinations for the following service contracts:

(a) Each new solicitation and contract in excess of $2,500.

(b) Each contract modification which brings the contract above $2,500 and-

(1) Extends the existing contract pursuant to an option clause or otherwise; or

(2) Changes the scope of the contract whereby labor requirements are affected significantly.

(c) Each multiple year contract in excess of $2,500 upon-

(1) Annual anniversary date if the contract is subject to annual appropriations; or

(2) Biennial anniversary date if the contract is not subject to annual appropriations and its proposed

term exceeds 2 years-unless otherwise advised by the Wage and Hour Division.

Parent topic: Subpart 22.10 - Service Contract Labor Standards
47.303-15 F.o.b. designated air carrier’s terminal, point of exportation.       (a)                   *Explanation of delivery term.*"F.o.b. designated air carrier’s terminal, point of exportation" means free of expense to the Government loaded aboard the aircraft, or delivered to the custody of the air carrier (if only the air carrier performs the loading), at the air carrier’s terminal specified in the contract.                                          (b)                   *Contractor responsibilities.* The contractor shall-                                                         (1)                                                                           (i) 										                    Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or                                                                              (ii) 										                    In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment for air transportation in conformance with carrier requirements to protect the goods and to ensure assessment of the lowest applicable transportation charge;                                                                                                           (2)                                                                           (i) 										                    Deliver the shipment in good order and condition into the conveyance of the carrier, or to the custody of the carrier (if only the carrier performs the loading), at the point of delivery and on the date or within the period specified in the contract; and                                                                              (ii) 										                    Pay and bear all applicable charges up to this point;                                                                                                           (3) 								                Provide a clean bill of lading and/or air waybill;                                                            (4) 								                Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before delivery of the goods to the point specified in the contract; and                                                            (5) 								                At the Government’s request and expense, assist in obtaining the documents required for the purpose of exportation.                                                                             (c)                   *Contract clause.* The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at 52.247-43. F.o.b. Designated Air Carrier’s Terminal, Point of Exportation, when the delivery term is f.o.b. designated air carrier’s terminal, point of exportation.    **Parent topic:** 47.303 Standard delivery terms and contract clauses.