alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                                               FRONTIER ENERGY CORP.
                                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350



         The undersigned, Robert Genesi, in his capacities as President and
Acting Chief Financial Officer of Frontier Energy Corp. does hereby certify that
the Form 10-KSB of Frontier Energy Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2006
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information
contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Frontier Energy Corp.

         This certification is given by the undersigned solely for the purpose
of 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is subject to the knowledge standard contained therein.


         Executed this 17th day of April, 2007.


/s/ Robert Genesi
Robert Genesi
President and Acting Chief Financial Officer
Principal Financial Officer
#### PEOPLE ex rel. INTERSTATE PAVING Co., Appellant, v. METZ, Comptroller, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of the Interstate Paving Company, against Herman A. Metz, as comptroller, etc.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

XAVIER U. RIGSBY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-452-AW-MAF

TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION, et al., 

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF 

No. 11), to which no objections have been filed. I agree with the magistrate judge’s 

conclusions, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated into 

this order. The clerk will enter a judgment that says “This case is dismissed for 

failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute.” The clerk will then 

close the file.

SO ORDERED on January 14, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00452-AW-MAF Document 12 Filed 01/14/21 Page 1 of 1
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Yulu Bai, the Chief Executive Officer of CHINA
FORESTRY INDUSTRY GROUP, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.     The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement
this 12th day of April, 2011.

/s/ Yulu
BaiYulu Bai Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China Forestry Industry Group, Inc. and will be
retained by China Forestry Industry Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
#### § 29.1005 Color.

The third factor of a grade based on the relative hues, saturations or chromas, and color values common to the type.
Subpart 22.20 - [Reserved]

Parent topic: Part 22 - Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:04CR1-SPM/AK

RONALD RYAN SHEPARD,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 154, motion for extension of time to file a

response to the § 2255 motion. For good cause shown, the Court finds the motion to be well

taken.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

 That the motion for extension of time, Doc. 154, is GRANTED;

That the Government shall file its response no later than June 2, 2008;

That Petitioner may file a reply no later than July 2, 2008.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of May, 2008.

 S/A. Kornblum ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cr-00001-SPM-AK Document 157 Filed 05/06/08 Page 1 of 1
Amendment No. 6 to ADPI 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT NO. 6 
 TO 
 AMERICAN DENTAL PARTNERS, INC. 
 1997 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
 The American Dental Partners, Inc. 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended pursuant to the following provisions:

  

	 	1.	Definitions 

 All capitalized terms used in this
amendment which are not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings given such terms in the Plan. 
  

	 	2.	Shares Subject to Plan 

 The maximum aggregate
number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the Plan, as provided in Section 3 of the Plan, is increased by 250,000 shares to a total of 800,000 shares. 
  

	 	3.	Term and Termination of Plan 

 Pursuant to the
provisions of Section 15 of the Plan, the Plan has been extended for additional Option Periods, and shall terminate automatically following the end of the Option Period ending on December 31, 2015. 
  

	 	4.	Effective Date; Construction 

 The effective date of
this amendment is April 28, 2009, and this amendment shall be deemed to be a part of the Plan as of such date. In the event of any inconsistencies between the provisions of the Plan and this amendment, the provisions of this amendment shall
control. Except as modified by this amendment, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect without change.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard H., Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 7, 1979, affirmed (see Penal Law, § 60.02, as amd by L 1974, ch 653, § 6; see, also, Penal Law, § 60.01, subd 2; § 65.00, subd 1, par [b]; *People v Eason,*40 NY2d 297; *People v James S.,*65 AD2d 823). The case is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Gibbons, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:98-cr-00005-MP

BRODDRICK DESHON MONGO,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Letter Motion for Correction of Judgment, Doc. 27, by

Broddrick Deshon Mongo, Doc. 29. Mr. Mongo explains that he was sentenced to 180 months’

imprisonment in federal court, and was later sentenced to 6.6 years by a state court, to run

concurrent with his federal sentence. His release date was projected from the day of sentencing

until October 2009 to be February 25, 2011. To his consternation, however, his release date was

extended from 2011 to 2021. The cause of this change is not clear. In order that the Court may

more fully analyze the issue, the United States is DIRECTED to respond to Mr. Mongo’s letter

and attachments, Doc. 29, no later than July 29, 2010. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of

this order to the United States Probation Office, and one to the Federal Public Defender. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of June, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Puget Sound

Nisqually River

Twin

Barns

Visitor

Center

Temporary

Education 

Center

 ̈§¦5

McAll si ter Creek

Luhr Beach Boat Ramp and 

Nisqually Beach Nature Center

Puget Sound

Nisqually River

Twin

Barns

Visitor

Center

Temporary

Education 

Center

 ̈§¦5

McAll si ter Creek

Luhr Beach Boat Ramp and 

Nisqually Beach Nature Center

Current Authorized Public Recreation

within the Study Area

3-49

Source: USFWS, 2000; Ducks Unlimited, 1999; EDAW, 2002

Chapter 3 Affected Environment

Nisqually NWR Draft CCP/EIS

Figure 3.6-1

P:\0e01401 Nisqually\GIS\mxd\Figure3.7-1.mxd

N

0 0.5 1 0.25 Miles

1:70,000

Legend

Approved Nisqually NWR Boundary

CCP Study Area

Bank Fishing Access

Recreation Trail

Hunting Area

(All Refuge waters outside dike open 

to boating and fishing)

Ring Dike Trail
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Conflict ResolutionCopingEarly Childhood EducationEmotional ResponseInterpersonal CommunicationParent RolePeer RelationshipPreventionSocial DevelopmentStudent BehaviorYoung Children

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
32.903 Responsibilities.       (a) 						            Agency heads-                                                         (1) 								                Must establish the policies and procedures necessary to implement this subpart;                                                            (2) 								                May prescribe additional standards for establishing invoice payment due dates (see 32.904) necessary to support agency programs and foster prompt payment to contractors;                                                            (3) 								                May adopt different payment procedures in order to accommodate unique circumstances, provided that such procedures are consistent with the policies in this subpart;                                                            (4) 								                Must inform contractors of points of contact within their cognizant payment offices to enable contractors to obtain status of invoices; and                                                            (5) May authorize the use of the accelerated payment methods specified at                             5 CFR 1315.5, but see 32.009-1(a).                                                                             (b) 						            When drafting solicitations and contracts, contracting officers must identify for each line item number, subline item number, or exhibit line item number-                                                         (1) 								                The applicable Prompt Payment clauses that apply to each item when the solicitation or contract contains items that will be subject to different payment terms; and                                                            (2) 								                The applicable Prompt Payment food category (*e.g.,* which item numbers are meat or meat food products, which are perishable agricultural commodities), when the solicitation or contract contains multiple payment terms for various classes of foods and edible products.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 32.9 - Prompt Payment
§ 51.1911 Damaged. *Damaged* means any defect which materially affects the appearance, or edible, shipping or keeping quality of the tomatoes. Any one of the following defects or any combination thereof, the seriousness of which exceeds the maximum allowed for any one defect, shall be considered as damage: ( a ) Cuts which are not shallow, not well healed, or when more than 1 ⁄ 2 inch in length.
( b ) Puffiness if the open space in one or more locules materially affects the appearance when the tomato is cut through the center at right angles to a line running from the stem to the blossom end.
( c ) *Catfaces.* These are irregular, dark, leathery scars at the blossom end of the fruit. Such scars damage the tomato when they are rough or deep, or when channels extend into the locule, or when they are fairly smooth and greater in area than a circle 3 ⁄ 8 inch in diameter on a 21 ⁄ 2 inch tomato. Smaller tomatoes shall have lesser areas of fairly smooth catfaces and larger tomatoes may have greater areas, provided that such catfaces do not affect the appearance of the tomatoes to a greater extent than that caused by fairly smooth catfaces which are permitted on a 21 ⁄ 2 inch tomato.
( d ) *Growth cracks.* These are ruptures or cracks radiating from the stem scar, or concentric to the stem scar. They damage the tomato when not well healed, or when more than 1 ⁄ 2 inch in length measured from the margin of the stem scar; except that very narrow, well healed cracks concentric to the stem scar shall not be considered as damage unless they are so numerous as to damage the appearance of the fruit.
( e ) Scars (except catfaces), when dark colored and shallow and aggregating more than 1 ⁄ 4 inch in diameter on a tomato 21 ⁄ 2 inches in diameter, or lighter colored shallow scars covering a greater area when they detract from the appearance to a greater extent than a dark-colored, shallow scar 1 ⁄ 4 inch in diameter. Smaller tomatoes shall have lesser areas of scars and larger tomatoes may have greater areas: *Provided,* That such scars do not affect the appearance of the tomatoes to a greater extent than that caused by scars which are permitted on a 21 ⁄ 2-inch tomato. A scar which penetrates the wall of the tomato shall be considered as damage.
( f ) Dry rot such as dry type Macrosporium or Phoma, when the spot is not adjacent to the stem scar, or when adjacent to the stem scar and more than 3 ⁄ 16 inch in diameter.
#### § 51.2085 Fairly uniform color.

*Fairly uniform color* means that the shells do not show excessive variation in color, whether bleached or natural.
#### § 52.1011 Score sheet for dates.

| Size and kind of container | | | |
| Container mark or identification | | | |
| Label or brand | | | |
| Net weight | | | |
| Style | | | |
| Count (per lb.) | | | |
| Moisture content (if determined) | | | |
| One variety (□) Yes (□) No | | | |
| Factors | | | |
| | Score points | | |
| Color | 20 | (A) | 18-20 |
| | | (B) (B-Dry) | 1 16-17 |
| | | (C) (C-Dry) | 1 14-15 |
| | | (SStd) | 1 0-13 |
| Uniformity of size | 10 | (A) (B) (B-Dry) | 9-10 1 8 |
| | | (C) (C-Dry) | 1 7 |
| | | (SStd) | 1 0-6 |
| Absence of defects | 30 | (A) (B) (B-Dry) | 27-30 1 24-26 |
| | | (C) (C-Dry) | 1 21-23 |
| | | (SStd) | 1 0-20 |
| Character | 40 | (A) | 36-40 |
| | | (B) (B-Dry) | 1 32-35 |
| | | (C) (C-Dry) | 1 28-31 |
| | | (SStd) | 1 0-27 |
| Total score | 100 | | |
| Grade | | | |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Limiting rule. | | | |
43.000 Scope of part.       This part prescribes policies and procedures for preparing and processing contract modifications for all types of contracts including construction and architect-engineer contracts. It does not apply to-                                       (a) 						            Orders for supplies or services not otherwise changing the terms of contracts or agreements (*e.g.,* delivery orders under indefinite-delivery contracts); or                                          (b) 						            Modifications for extraordinary contractual relief (see subpart  50.1).    **Parent topic:** Part 43 - Contract Modifications
52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting with

Inverted Domestic Corporations.

As prescribed in 9.108-5(b), insert the following clause:

Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations (Nov 2015)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clauseInverted domestic corporation means a foreign incorporated entity that meets the definition of an

inverted domestic corporation under 6 U.S.C. 395(b), applied in accordance with the rules and

definitions of 6 U.S.C. 395(c).

Subsidiary means an entity in which more than 50 percent of the entity is owned-

(1) Directly by a parent corporation; or

(2) Through another subsidiary of a parent corporation.

(b) If the contractor reorganizes as an inverted domestic corporation or becomes a subsidiary of an

inverted domestic corporation at any time during the period of performance of this contract, the

Government may be prohibited from paying for Contractor activities performed after the date when

it becomes an inverted domestic corporation or subsidiary. The Government may seek any available

remedies in the event the Contractor fails to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of

the contract as a result of Government action under this clause.

(c) Exceptions to this prohibition are located at 9.108-2.

(d) In the event the Contractor becomes either an inverted domestic corporation, or a subsidiary of

an inverted domestic corporation during contract performance, the Contractor shall give written

notice to the Contracting Officer within five business days from the date of the inversion event.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.209 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Belnord Holding Corp. et al., Respondents, v Daniel W. Joy, as Commissioner of the Rent Control Division of the Office of Rent and Housing Maintenance of the City of New York, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 12, 1979, granting petition in an article 78 proceeding and vacating order of respondent-appellant New York City Commissioner of Rent Control Division, which made a finding of harassment and imposed civil penalties on petitioner, is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the petition is dismissed. There was evidence in the record before the appellant that the rain leakage problem was long term; that the landlord did not provide the tenants with protection; that the landlord abused the tenants and went so far as to say to one of the rent controlled tenants that if it was so inconvenient for the tenant, why didn’t the tenant move. On this evidence appellant rent commissioner made a finding that: "It is found the respondents have for a long period of time failed to deal with the recurrent and disruptive roof leak conditions which have repeatedly damaged and wetted walls and ceilings in the subject apartments and subjected the tenants to heavy flooding * * * I find the *550various described work stated to have been done * * * were ineffective to relieve and abate these problems and that the ineffectual results thereof were known to them. * * * It must be assumed that the respondents’ conduct mirrors their intentions, and they must be presumed to intend the natural consequences of their acts, namely a lack of care and concern of their knowing and ineffective repair and the effect on the tenants’ lives. The flooding into the subject apartments has impinged upon the tenants’ peaceful use and quiet enjoyment of their apartments and may reasonably be deemed to be intended to cause them to waive their rights under the Rent Law as well as force them to vacate.” Questions of credibility and inferences of fact were for appellant to make. What the Court of Appeals recently said about the State Human Rights Division in its area of competence is equally applicable to the City Rent Control Division in its area of competence: "the division’s expertise in evaluating discrimination claims and formulating appropriate remedies may not be lightly disregarded in view of its wide discretion, legislatively endowed, to weigh and assess the conduct of the parties and to reach conclusions based on what is fairly inferable from the facts”. *(State Off. of Drug Abuse Servs. v State Human Rights Appeal Bd.,*48 NY2d 276, 284.) On this record we are unable to say that appellant’s determination was without rational basis or not based on substantial evidence. Concur—Kupferman, J..P., Birns, Silverman, Ross and Lynch, JJ.
exh10-3_1352598.htm


    EXHIBIT
10.3

    

     

    May 5,
2009

     

    Karen
Narwold

    1701 N.
Bancroft Parkway

    Wilmington,
DE 19806-2001

    


    Re:           Amendment to Employment
Agreement

     

    Dear
Karen,

     

    The Board
of Directors of Barzel Industries Inc. (the “Corporation”) has determined that
it is in the best interests of the Corporation to temporarily decrease salaries
of our executives and other employees of the Corporation.  Your
employment agreement with the Corporation contemplates that your salary will be
at least $400,000.  The Corporation would like to amend your
employment agreement to provide for a temporary reduction of your salary to
$300,000 effective as of May 11, 2009.  Such reduction shall remain in
effect until the Corporation elects to terminate this temporary reduction or you
give notice to the Corporation that such reduction is no longer
acceptable.  Upon the occurrence of either such event, your salary
shall return to the amount in effect before the
reduction.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, for all other purposes of
the employment agreement (including Section 5) and all benefit plan purposes,
the term “Salary” shall mean the amount of annual salary in effect before the
reduction.

     

    By
signing this letter below, you consent to the amendment of your employment
agreement as provided herein.  We look forward to your continued
contributions to the Corporation.

     

    
      
        	 
      	
                Respectfully
      Yours,

                 

                 

              
	 
      	
                BARZEL
      INDUSTRIES INC.

                 

                 

              
	 
      	
                By:
      /s/ Oded Cohen

              
	 
      	
                Name:  Oded
      Cohen

              
	 
      	
                Title:  Compensation
      Committee Chairman

              


      

    

    


    
      	
              

                Acknowledged
      and Agreed to by:

              

            	
               

            


    

     

     

    
      
        
          	
                  /s/ Karen Narwold

                	 


        

      

    

    
      	
              

                KAREN
      NARWOLD
# 47.208-1 Advance notice.

Military (and as required, civilian agency) storage and distribution points, depots, and other receiving activities require advance notice of *shipments* en route from contractors’ plants. Generally, this notification is required only for classified material; sensitive, controlled, and certain other protected material; explosives, and some other hazardous materials; selected *shipments* requiring movement control; or minimum carload or truckload *shipments*. It facilitates arrangements for transportation control, labor, space, and use of materials handling equipment at destination. Also, timely receipt of notices by the consignee transportation office precludes the incurring of demurrage and vehicle detention charges.

**Parent topic:**47.208 Report of shipment (REPSHIP).
EXHIBIT 32.1



July 31, 2009

Securities and Exchange
Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group
LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/    Bruce Wasserstein                              
|Bruce Wasserstein Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.