alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 550.116 Prior approvals. ( a ) *Approval.* With regard to 2 CFR 200.308(d)(4), prior documented approval from the REE Agency ADO is required for all prior approval requirements described in paragraph 2 CFR 200.308(d)(2).
( b ) *No cost extensions.* With regard to 2 CFR 200.308(d)(2), all time extensions will only be approved by an amendment to the award. The Cooperator shall prepare and submit a written request to the ADO (which must be received no later than 10 days prior to the expiration date of the award). The request must contain, at a minimum, the following information: ( 1 ) The length of additional time required to complete project objectives and a justification for the extension;
( 2 ) A summary of progress to date (a copy of the most recent progress report is acceptable provided the information is current); and,
( 3 ) Signature of the Authorized Representative and the Principal Investigator requesting the extension. Any request received by the ADO that does not meet this requirement will be returned for the necessary signature(s).
( c ) *Budget revisions.* Budget revisions among direct cost categories or programs, functions, and activities for awards in which the Federal share of the project *exceeds* the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and the cumulative amount of such transfers *exceeds* or *is expected to exceed* 10 percent of the total budget as last approved by the REE Agency requires prior documented approval.
( d ) *Advertising.* See § 550.121 of this part.
47.207-3 Description of shipment, origin, and

destination.

(a) Origin of shipments. The contracting officer shall include in solicitations full details regarding the

location from which the freight is to be shipped. For example, if a single location is shown, furnish

the shipper’s name, street address, city, State, and ZIP code. If several or indefinite locations are

involved, as in the case of multiple shippers or drayage contracts, describe the area of origin

including boundaries and ZIP codes.

(b) Destination of shipments. The contracting officer shall include full details regarding delivery

points. For example, if a single delivery point is shown, furnish the consignee’s name, street address,

city, State, and ZIP code. If several or indefinite delivery points are involved, describe the delivery

area, including boundaries and ZIP codes.

(c) Description of the freight. The contracting officer shall include in solicitations-

(1) An inventory if the freight consists of nonbulk items; and

(2) The freight classification description, which should be obtained from the transportation office. If

a freight classification description is not available, use a clear nontechnical description. Include

additional details necessary to ensure that the prospective offerors have complete information about

the freight; e.g., size, weight, hazardous material, whether packed for export, or unusual value.

(d) Exclusion of freight. The contracting officer shall-

(1) Clearly identify any freight or types of shipments that are subject to exclusion; e.g., bulk freight,

hazardous commodities, or shipments under or over specified weights; and

(2) Insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 52.247-7, Freight Excluded, when any

commodities or types of shipments have been identified for exclusion.

(e) Quantity.

(1) The contracting officer shall state the actual weight of the freight or a reasonably accurate

estimate. The following are examples:

(i) If the contract covers transportation services required over an extended period of time, include a

schedule of actual or estimated tonnage or number of items to be transported per week, month, or

other time period.

(ii) If the contract covers a group movement of household goods, give an estimate of the aggregate

weights and the basis for determining the aggregate weight.

(2) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-8, Estimated Weights or Quantities Not

Guaranteed, when weights or quantities are estimates.

Parent topic: 47.207 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and special requirements.
§ 51.44 Disposition of fees. ( a ) The fees collected for services rendered shall be disposed of as follows: ( 1 ) Fees for inspections made by inspectors acting exclusively for the Agricultural Marketing Service shall be remitted promptly to the Agricultural Marketing Service.
( 2 ) Fees for inspections made by an inspector acting under a cooperative agreement with a State or other organization shall be disposed of in accordance with the terms of such agreement. Such portion of the fees collected under a cooperative agreement with a State or other cooperating bodies as may be due the United States shall be remitted to the Agricultural Marketing Service.
( b ) Fees and charges collected pursuant to §§ 51.40 to 51.41 shall be remitted to the Agricultural Marketing Service.
( c ) Fees and charges collected pursuant to § 51.42 shall be disposed of in accordance with the terms of the contract.
27.306 Licensing background patent rights

to third parties.

(a) A contract with a small business concern or nonprofit organization shall not contain a provision

allowing the Government to require the licensing to third parties of inventions owned by the

contractor that are not subject inventions unless the agency head has approved and signed a written

justification in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section. The agency head may not delegate this

authority and may exercise the authority only if it is determined that the-

(1) Use of the invention by others is necessary for the practice of a subject invention or for the use of

a work object of the contract; and

(2) Action is necessary to achieve the practical application of the subject invention or work object.

(b) Any determination will be on the record after an opportunity for a hearing, and the agency shall

notify the contractor of the determination by certified or registered mail. The notification shall

include a statement that the contractor must bring any action for judicial review of the

determination within 60 days after the notification.

Parent topic: Subpart 27.3 - Patent Rights under Government Contracts
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00649-CV

Patricia Perez, Appellant

v.

Salt Financial Services, LLC, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-14-004318, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On December 9, 2014, the Clerk of this Court sent notice to appellant Patricia Perez

that her brief was due on December 4, 2014, and was overdue, and that if she failed to file a brief,

this Court would dismiss her appeal for want of prosecution. The Clerk also notified Perez that her

appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if she did not respond to this Court by

December 19, 2014. To date, Perez has not responded to this Court’s notice and has not filed a brief. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).
__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: January 28, 2015

2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 16, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 16, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21A1404. YEN CHUN JAN et al. v. WOOIYI YIN.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion the hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BETTY YOUNG,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CENTURION OF FLORIDA, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

CASE NO. 3:20cv5818-TKW/MJF

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff Betty Young hereby notifies this Honorable Court that the parties have 

reached a settlement in principle. The settlement documents are currently being 

prepared, and the parties will file a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice upon 

consummation of the settlement.

Respectfully submitted this 10th day of June, 2021.

TEIN MALONE PLLC

Counsel for Plaintiff

/s/ Gaye L. Huxoll ________

Gaye L. Huxoll

Florida Bar No. 149497

ghuxoll@teinmalone.com

(305) 442-1101

Case 3:20-cv-05818-TKW-MJF Document 28 Filed 06/10/21 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of the members of the Senior Executive Service Performance Review Boards for the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. The purpose of the Performance Review Boards is to view and make recommendations concerning proposed performance appraisals, ratings, and bonuses, and other appropriate personnel actions for members of the Senior Executive Service.

# DATES:

This notice is effective December 7, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Barbara Torres, Administrative Officer, at 202-942-1683.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Title 5, U.S. Code, 4314(c)(4), requires that the appointment of Performance Review Board members be published in the                     **Federal Register**                     before Board service commences. The following persons will serve on the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board's Performance Review Boards which will oversee the evaluation of the performance appraisals of the Senior Executive Service members of the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board: Mark A. Hagerty, Pamela-Jeanne Moran, James B. Petrick, Tracey A. Ray, Thomas J. Trabucco, and Renée Wilder.                

Thomas K. Emswiler,

General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-30633 Filed 12-6-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
#### §§ 701.113-701.116 [Reserved]
#### § 653.4 Availability of technical standards.

Information on technical standards used by NRCS is available at field, area, or State offices of NRCS.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            6329
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      148
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  7470
<PP&E>                                           40238
<DEPRECIATION>                                   15229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   33097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4799
<BONDS>                                          29511
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1213)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     33097
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 25075
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  14772
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              14772
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   1165
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     15937
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   187.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   187.97
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6264

MICHAEL T. BRAXTON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN OF KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 8:20

- cv - 03168

- HMH )

Submitted : August 30, 2021 Decided: October 21, 2021

Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Michael T. Braxton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael T. Braxton seeks t o appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Braxton’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 2 8 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standa rd by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the pri soner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473 , 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Braxton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and lega l contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 1:03cr67-SPM

1:05cr3-SPM

VINCENTE ANTONIO TORRALBA,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER CONTINUING SENTENCING

AND AUTHORIZING FUNDS FOR EXAMINATION IN ALACHUA COUNTY

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Continue

Sentencing (doc. 52), with a request for authorization to expend funds for a

neuropsychological examination and request that Defendant be held in the

Alachua County Jail until the new sentencing date to allow for his examinations. 

For good cause shown, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The motion (doc. 52) is granted.

2. Sentencing is reset for 1:30 p.m. on Tuesday, August 9, 2005.

3. Defendant may incur expenses, not to exceed $1,200, to retain an

expert neuropsychologist for consultation and examination.

4. To facilitate examination, the United States Marshal shall transport 

Case 1:03-cr-00067-SPM-AK Document 53 Filed 07/06/05 Page 1 of 2
and keep Defendant at the Alachua County Jail until the new sentencing date. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of July, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 1:03-cr-00067-SPM-AK Document 53 Filed 07/06/05 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7



ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AND NONCOMPETE AGREEMENT
R. C. MATNEY

This Agreement, dated this 1st day of February, 1999 is made by and between 
R. C. Matney, a resident of the State of Indiana ("Executive"), and Mark VII, 
Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Employer").

RECITALS

Executive and Employer previously entered into "Employment and Noncompete
Agreement" as of April 1, 1992 and subsequent addenda dated July 1, 1994,
October 1, 1996 and October 1, 1997. The parties undertake and agree to modify
said Agreement and Addenda to the extent expressly stated herein. In all other
respects, the said Agreement and Addenda shall remain as originally stated.

AGREEMENT

In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements contained
herein and in the underlying Agreement and Addenda, the parties do hereby
further agree as follows:

I.   BASE SALARY.

Commencing January 1, 1999, the base salary of Executive shall be $330,000 a
year.

II.  MONTHLY SHAREHOLDER VALUE BONUS.

Commencing January 1, 1999, Executive shall be paid a monthly bonus equal in
amount to the current average fair-market value of the Company's common stock
during the month for which the bonus is paid multiplied by 800.

III. DISCONTINUATION OF BONUS BASED ON STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE.

Subparagraph B of Paragraph III of the Addendum dated October 1, 1997 is
discontinued as of December 31, 1998. However, any bonus earned for the interval
of July 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998 shall be paid as originally agreed.

IV.  STOCK OPTIONS.


<PAGE>   2
By separate document, Employer shall provide Executive with an option to
purchase 40,000 shares of Employer's common stock exercisable at a price equal
to the market closing price on January 6, 1999 which shall vest in 5 equal
annual installments commencing January 1, 2000 exercisable one year after
vesting. The options shall lapse December 31, 2009.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Addendum on the day
and year first above written.



"EXECUTIVE"


/s/ R. C. Matney
--------------------------------
R.C. Matney




"EMPLOYER"


MARK VII, INC.

a Delaware corporation


By: /s/ James T. Graves
---------------------------------
James T. Graves, Vice Chairman
# C_2014118EN.01000401.xml

| 17.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/4

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 April 2014

appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for Greece and Romania

2014/C 118/03

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Decision 2003/C 218/01 of 22 July 2003 setting up an Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work (1), and in particular Article 3 thereof,

1

Having regard to the list of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 22 April 2013 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period from 22 April 2013 until 28 February 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 22 April 2013 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period from 22 April 2013 until 28 February 2016.

2

| (2) | The Governments of Greece and Romania have submitted further nominations for several posts to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Governments of Greece and Romania have submitted further nominations for several posts to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are appointed members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 28 February 2016:

I.   TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES

| Country | Member | Alternate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Romania | Mr Adrian CLIPII | Mr Corneliu CONSTANTINOAIA
  Mr Dumitru FORNEA |

Country

Member

Alternate

Romania

Mr Adrian CLIPII

Mr Corneliu CONSTANTINOAIA

Mr Dumitru FORNEA

II.   EMPLOYERS’ REPRESENTATIVES

| Country | Member | Alternate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Greece | Mr Christos KAVALOPOULOS | Mr Pavlos KYRIAKONGONAS
  Ms Natassa AVLONITOU |

Country

Member

Alternate

Greece

Mr Christos KAVALOPOULOS

Mr Pavlos KYRIAKONGONAS

Ms Natassa AVLONITOU

Article 2

The members and alternate members not yet nominated will be appointed by the Council at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 14 April 2014.

For the Council

The President

A. TSAFTARIS

---

(1)  OJ C 218, 13.9.2003, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 120, 26.4.2013, p. 7.

2

---