alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
52.203-18 Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements-Representation.       As prescribed in 3.909-3(a), insert the following provision:          Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements-Representation (Jan 2017)                                       (a)                   *Definition*. As used in this provision-                *Internal confidentiality agreement or statement, subcontract, and *subcontractor**, are defined in the clause at 52.203-19, Prohibition on Requiring Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements.                                          (b) 						            In accordance with section 743 of Division E, Title VII, of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235) and its successor provisions in subsequent appropriations acts (and as extended in continuing resolutions), Government agencies are not permitted to use funds appropriated (or otherwise made available) for contracts with an entity that requires employees or subcontractors of such entity seeking to report waste, fraud, or abuse to sign internal confidentiality agreements or statements prohibiting or otherwise restricting such employees or subcontractors from lawfully reporting such waste, fraud, or abuse to a designated investigative or law enforcement representative of a Federal department or agency authorized to receive such information.                                          (c) 						            The prohibition in paragraph (b) of this provision does not contravene requirements applicable to Standard Form 312, (Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement), Form 4414 (Sensitive Compartmented Information Nondisclosure Agreement), or any other form issued by a Federal department or agency governing the nondisclosure of classified information.                                          (d)                   *Representation*. By submission of its offer, the Offeror represents that it will not require its employees or subcontractors to sign or comply with internal confidentiality agreements or statements prohibiting or otherwise restricting such employees or subcontractors from lawfully reporting waste, fraud, or abuse related to the performance of a Government contract to a designated investigative or law enforcement representative of a Federal department or agency authorized to receive such information (e.g., agency Office of the Inspector General).                                 (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.203 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 34.2**

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Board of Directors and ShareholderWashington Mutual Bank

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Servicer’s Report on Assessment of Compliance, that Washington Mutual Bank and subsidiaries (the “Company”) complied with the servicingcriteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Regulation AB for the securitizations of pools of mortgage loans that were completed on or after January 1, 2006, and prior to January 1, 2007, forwhich the Company performed servicing functions set forth in Item 1122(d), that included one or more classes of publicly offered securities registered with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, and for which the Company has an obligation to deliver anAssessment of Compliance pursuant to Item 1122 (the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria 1122 (d)(1)(iii) and 1122 (d)(3)(i)(C-D), which management has determined are not applicable to the activitiesperformed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with theservicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, includedexamining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during theperiod covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each specific asset-backed transaction included in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errorsthat may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 14, 2007
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Nov-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  August-31-1997
<CASH>                        55,813
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 97,877
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              153,690
<PP&E>                        20,974,747
<DEPRECIATION>                (8,964,482)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                13,680,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         534,675
<BONDS>                       2,538,862
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    8,075,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  13,680,085
<SALES>                       2,067,229
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              2,133,506
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 969,791
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              985,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            301,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (123,213)
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (123,213)
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  (123,213)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (2.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (2.27)
        

</TABLE>
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND **

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                L. Paul Latham                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| L.                Paul Latham                                |
| President                and Chief Executive Officer         |
| of                Southwest Royalties, Inc., the             |
| Managing                General Partner of                   |
| Southwest                Royalties, Inc. Income Fund VI      |
|                                                         |
| April                5, 2007                                 |
|                                                         |
|                                                         |
| /s/                Mel G. Riggs                              |
| Mel                G. Riggs                                  |
| Vice                President and Chief Financial Officer of |
| Southwest                Royalties, Inc., the                |
| Managing                General Partner of                   |
| Southwest                Royalties, Inc. Income Fund VI      |
|                                                         |
| April                5,                2007                  |
#### UNITED WIRELESS TELEGRAPH CO. et al. v. NATIONAL ELECTRIC SIGNALING CO.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

September 10, 1912.)

No. 953.

On petition by appellee for rehearing.

Denied.

For former opinion, see 198 Fed. 386.

Before COLT, Circuit Judge, and ALDRICH and BROWN, District Judges.

FFR CURIAM.

On a careful consideration of the complainant’s petition for a rehearing, we find nothing which leads us to think that we have in any respect misunderstood the contentions of the complainant as to the invention disclosed in the Fessenden patent, No. 706,736. Neither have we failed to understand or to recognize in the opinion the difference between the mode in which the received energy was used by Lodge and Marconi and the mode of use described in the Fessenden patent.

The elaborate discussion by the petitioner of the propriety of the use of the terms “voltage” and “current” is largely a question of terms, and of the propriety or sufficiency of certain expressions to mark a difference, which is sufficiently stated in the opinion. The petition for a rehearing- discloses nothing which indicates any mistake of fact or any misunderstanding of complainant’s contentions that at all affects our principal finding that the complainant’s various descriptions of Fessenden’s invention are unsound abstractions, in this: That they omit Fessenden’s principle of operation.

The principal tests of infringements which the complainant proposes are not fair descriptions of Fessenden’s invention as described in the patent. Fessenden is not entitled to a patent upon abstractions which do not conform to the invention which is set forth in the specification.

The contention that Fessenden, upon any showing made by the complainant in this case, should be entitled to cover the principle of using the received energy itself to produce motion that may be observed in any way whatever is contrary to that long line of decisions which hold that an inventor cannot block the path of improvement merely by ingenuity in framing claims which, in the broadest abstract-terms, cover all foreseen possibilities of improvement, but do not fairly represent an invention already made.

As no judge who concurred in this opinion desires a rehearing, the petition for rehearing is denied.
42.709-6 Waiver of the penalty.

The cognizant contracting officer shall waive the penalties at 42.709-2(a) when—

(a) The contractor withdraws the proposal before the Government formally initiates an audit of the

proposal and the contractor submits a revised proposal (an audit will be deemed to be formally

initiated when the Government provides the contractor with written notice, or holds an entrance

conference, indicating that audit work on a specific final indirect cost proposal has begun);

(b) The amount of the unallowable costs under the proposal which are subject to the penalty is

$10,000 or less (i.e., if the amount of expressly or previously determined unallowable costs which

would be allocated to the contracts specified in 42.709-1(b) is $10,000 or less); or

(c) The contractor demonstrates, to the cognizant contracting officer’s satisfaction, that-

(1) It has established policies and personnel training and an internal control and review system that

provide assurance that unallowable costs subject to penalties are precluded from being included in

the contractor’s final indirect cost rate proposals (e.g., the types of controls required for satisfactory

participation in the Department of Defense sponsored self governance programs, specific accounting

controls over indirect costs, compliance tests which demonstrate that the controls are effective, and

Government audits which have not disclosed recurring instances of expressly unallowable costs);

and

(2) The unallowable costs subject to the penalty were inadvertently incorporated into the proposal;

i.e., their inclusion resulted from an unintentional error, notwithstanding the exercise of due care.

Parent topic: 42.709 Penalties for Unallowable Costs.
52.214-3 Amendments to Invitations for Bids.       As prescribed in 14.201-6(b)(1), insert the following provision:          Amendments to Invitations for Bids (Dec 2016)                                       (a) 						            If this solicitation is amended, then all terms and conditions which are not modified remain unchanged.                                          (b)                                                         (1) 								                Bidders shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment to this solicitation-                                                                           (i) 										                    By signing and returning the amendment;                                                                              (ii) 										                    By identifying the amendment number and date in space provided for this purpose on the form for submitting a bid;                                                                              (iii) 										                    By letter;                                                                              (iv) 										                    By facsimile, if facsimile bids are authorized in the solicitation; or                                                                              (v) 										                    By email, if email bids are authorized in the solicitation.                                                                                                           (2) 								                The Government must receive the acknowledgement by the time and at the place specified for receipt of bids.                                                                    (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.214 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 12.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Louis T. Hsieh, Chief Financial Officer of New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (the Company), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company
and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2007



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Louis T. Hsieh     
|Name:  |  | Louis T. Hsieh         
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
---

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated November 15, 2010 relating to the July 31, 2010 audited financial
statements of the Company which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
that period in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-168724 and No.
333-159480).

We also consent to the references to us under the heading
Experts in such Registration Statement.

/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP

MaloneBailey, LLP www.malone-bailey.com 
  Houston, Texas

November 15, 2010

---
27.000 Scope of part.       This part prescribes the policies, procedures, solicitation provisions, and contract clauses pertaining to patents, data, and copyrights.    **Parent topic:** Part 27 - Patents, Data, and Copyrights
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2760 

To suspend the duty on imports of ethanol, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2006 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. KYL, and Mr. SUNUNU) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend the duty on imports of ethanol, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DUTY FREE TREATMENT FOR IMPORTED ETH4 ANOL USED FOR FUEL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 99 of the 

6 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by striking heading 9901.00.50 and any U.S. 

8 note relating to that heading. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this subsection applies to goods entered, or withdrawn 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2760 IS 

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
# 49.103 Methods of settlement.

Settlement of terminated cost-reimbursement contracts and fixed-price contracts terminated for convenience *may* be effected by (a) negotiated agreement, (b) determination by the TCO, (c) costing-out under vouchers using SF 1034, Public Voucher for Purchases and Services Other Than Personal, for cost-reimbursement contracts (as prescribed in subpart  49.3), or (d) a combination of these methods. When possible, the TCO *should* negotiate a fair and prompt settlement with the contractor. The TCO *shall* settle a *settlement proposal* by determination only when it cannot be settled by agreement.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 49.1 - General Principles
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 253

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2005

Referred to the Committee on Resources 

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain 

land to the Edward H. McDaniel American Legion Post 

No. 22 in Pahrump, Nevada, for the construction of 

a post building and memorial park for use by the American Legion, other veterans’ groups, and the local community.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Edward H. McDaniel 

5 American Legion Post No. 22 Land Conveyance Act’’.
2

S 253 RFH 

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

2 In this Act: 

3 (1) POST NO. 22.—The term ‘‘Post No. 22’’ 

4 means the Edward H. McDaniel American Legion 

5 Post No. 22 in Pahrump, Nevada. 

6 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

7 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di8 rector of the Bureau of Land Management. 

9 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF LAND TO EDWARD H. MCDANIEL 

10 AMERICAN LEGION POST NO. 22. 

11 (a) CONVEYANCE ON CONDITION SUBSEQUENT.—

12 Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of 

13 this Act, subject to valid existing rights and the condition 

14 stated in subsection (c) and in accordance with the Act 

15 of June 14, 1926 (commonly known as the ‘‘Recreation 

16 and Public Purposes Act’’) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.), the 

17 Secretary shall convey to Post No. 22, for no consider18 ation, all right, title, and interest of the United States in 

19 and to the parcel of land described in subsection (b). 

20 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcel of land re21 ferred to in subsection (a) is the parcel of Bureau of Land 

22 Management land that— 

23 (1) is bounded by Route 160, Bride Street, and 

24 Dandelion Road in Nye County, Nevada; 

25 (2) consists of approximately 4.5 acres of land; 

26 and 
3

S 253 RFH 

1 (3) is more particularly described as a portion 

of the S 1 2 ⁄4 of section 29, T. 20 S., R. 54 E., Mount 

3 Diablo and Base Meridian. 

4 (c) CONDITION ON USE OF LAND.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Post No. 22 and any succes6 sors of Post No. 22 shall use the parcel of land de7 scribed in subsection (b) for the construction and 

8 operation of a post building and memorial park for 

9 use by Post No. 22, other veterans groups, and the 

10 local community for events and activities. 

11 (2) REVERSION.—Except as provided in para12 graph (3), if the Secretary, after notice to Post No. 

13 22 and an opportunity for a hearing, makes a find14 ing that Post No. 22 has used or permitted the use 

15 of the parcel for any purpose other than the purpose 

16 specified in paragraph (1) and Post No. 22 fails to 

17 discontinue that use, title to the parcel shall revert 

18 to the United States, to be administered by the Sec19 retary. 

20 (3) WAIVER.—The Secretary may waive the re21 quirements of paragraph (2) if the Secretary
4

S 253 RFH 

1 determines that a waiver would be in the best inter2 ests of the United States.

Passed the Senate July 26, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.