alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
KVA 50% L d T t l LWes Patterson, DOE Negotiating Committee, 04 Nov 2011KVAvs50%LoadTotalLossMVLF© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 1MVLF-1phALLdesigns (including out-of-scope)KVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...dEL2dEL3Where CGOand SA coexist15%-20% reductionSTD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%dEL2-dEL3is a stretchUnrestricted lossesdEL2-dEL3dEL2-dEL3© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 2MVLF-3phALLdesigns (including out-of-scope)KVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3dEL2-dEL3...Where CGOand SA coexist15%-20% reductiondEL2-dEL3Unrestricted lossesSTD-10%-20%-30%-40%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 3-50%Scratch SheetsMVLF-1phALLdesigns (including out-of-scope)KVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%Unrestricted losses© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 5MVLF-3phALLdesigns (including out-of-scope)KVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...Unrestricted lossesSTD-10%-20%-30%-40%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 6-50%Reference DataMVLFALLdesigns (including out-of-scope)KVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...4...2010 STD 3phAverage Trendbefore 2010 STD3⁄4 rule2010 STD 1ph© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 8MVLFALLdesigns (including out-of-scope)KVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1The currentstandard representsa loss reduction of- 45% for small KVA35% for large KVA-35%forlargeKVA2...3...4Large 1ph45%...2010 STD 3phFor same KVA rating-45%2010 STD 1phForsameKVAratingthe 1ph loss is equalto 0.75 x 3phLarge 3ph-35%Large 1ph-35%Small 1ph-45%Small 3ph-45%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 9MVLFALLdesigns – DOE KVA scopeKVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...4...STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%STD-10%20%--30%-40%-50%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 10MVLFALLdesigns – ABB-GO and OPS-SAKVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...4...STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%STD-10%20%--30%-40%-50%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 11MVLFALLdesigns – ABB-M3 and OPS-M3+SAKVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...4...STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%STD-10%20%--30%-40%-50%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 12MVLFALLdesigns – ABB-M3 and OPS-M3KVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...4...STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%STD-10%20%--30%-40%-50%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 13MVLFALLdesigns –PadsKVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...4...STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%STD-10%20%--30%-40%-50%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 14MVLFALLdesigns –PolesKVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...4...STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%STD-10%20%--30%-40%-50%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 15MVLFALLdesigns –NetworksKVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3STD...4...-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%STD-10%20%--30%-40%-50%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 16
AURORA LOAN SERVICES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Depositor:       Structured Asset Securities Corporation
                 Attention: Mortgage Finance LXS 2006-13
                 745 7th Avenue, 7th Floor
                 New York, NY 10019

Master Servicer: Aurora Loan Services LLC
                 Chris Baker
                 327 Inverness Drive South
                 Englewood, CO 80112

Trustee:         Citibank, N.A.
Attention:       Structured Finance LXS 2006-13
                 111 Wall Street, 14th Floor, Zone 3
                 New York, NY 10005

Subject:         Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year:     2006
Investor Code:   F67
Investor Name:   LXS 2006-13

I, Terry Gentry, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan
Services LLC (the "Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar
Year 2006:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar
year (or portion thereof) and of its performance under the Agreement for
such period has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects
throughout 2006 (or applicable portion thereof), or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, I have
specifically identified to the Master Servicer, the Depositor, and the
Trustee each such failure known to me and the nature and status thereof,
including the steps being taken by the Servicer to remedy such default.



                           Certified by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC

                                         By /s/ Terry L. Gentry
                                            ----------------------
                                         Name: Terry L. Gentry
                                         Title: Managing Director
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DANNY TORRES,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-287-TKW/MJF

GEO GROUP INC., et al.,

Defendants.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 7) and Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 10). The Court reviewed 

the objections de novo as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), and based on that 

review, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case is 

due to be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to completely and honestly disclose 

his litigation history. 

Plaintiff’s claim that he simply “forgot” about the undisclosed prior cases 

because he “blocked out a difficult time of his life” is not a justifiable excuse for his 

failure to list those cases. Plaintiff has an obligation to maintain information (or at 

least a list of case numbers) for all of his prior cases, and if he does not have that 

information, he can (and should) request it from the appropriate clerks’ offices 

before filing a new case. 

Case 5:20-cv-00287-TKW-MJF Document 11 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(A)(b)(1) and 

1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for maliciousness and abuse of the judicial process.

3. The Clerk shall close the case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of January, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00287-TKW-MJF Document 11 Filed 01/08/21 Page 2 of 2
45.000 Scope of part.       (a) 						            This part prescribes policies and procedures for providing Government property to contractors; contractors’ management and use of Government property; and reporting, redistributing, and disposing of contractor inventory.                                          (b) 						            It does not apply to-                                                         (1) 								                Government property provided under any statutory leasing authority, except as to non-Government use of property under 45.301(f);                                                            (2) 								                Property to which the Government has acquired a lien or title solely because of partial, advance, progress, or performance based payments;                                                            (3) 								                Disposal of real property;                                                            (4) 								                Software and intellectual property; or                                                            (5) 								                Government property that is incidental to the place of performance, when the contract requires contractor personnel to be located on a Government site or installation, and when the property used by the contractor within the location remains accountable to the Government. Items considered to be incidental to the place of performance include, for example, office space, desks, chairs, telephones, computers, and fax machines.    **Parent topic:** Part 45 - Government Property
28.102-2 Amount required.

(a) Definition. As used in this subsectionOriginal contract price means the award price of the contract; or, for requirements contracts, the

price payable for the estimated total quantity; or, for indefinite-quantity contracts, the price payable

for the specified minimum quantity. Original contract price does not include the price of any options,

except those options exercised at the time of contract award.

(b) Contracts exceeding $150,000-

(1) Performance bonds. Unless the contracting officer determines that a lesser amount is adequate

for the protection of the Government, the penal amount of performance bonds must equal-

(i) 100 percent of the original contract price; and

(ii) If the contract price increases, an additional amount equal to 100 percent of the increase.

(2) Payment bonds.

(i) Unless the contracting officer makes a written determination supported by specific findings that a

payment bond in this amount is impractical, the amount of the payment bond must equal-

(A) 100 percent of the original contract price; and

(B) If the contract price increases, an additional amount equal to 100 percent of the increase.

(ii) The amount of the payment bond must be no less than the amount of the performance bond.

(c) Contracts exceeding $35,000 but not exceeding $150,000. Unless the contracting officer

determines that a lesser amount is adequate for the protection of the Government, the penal amount

of the payment bond or the amount of alternative payment protection must equal-

(1) 100 percent of the original contract price; and

(2) If the contract price increases, an additional amount equal to 100 percent of the increase.

(d) Securing additional payment protection. If the contract price increases, the Government must

secure any needed additional protection by directing the contractor to-

(1) Increase the penal sum of the existing bond;

(2) Obtain an additional bond; or

(3) Furnish additional alternative payment protection.

(e) Reducing amounts. The contracting officer may reduce the amount of security to support a bond,

subject to the conditions of 28.203-3(c) or 28.204(b).

Parent topic: 28.102 Performance and payment bonds and alternative payment protections for
construction contracts.
#### Samuel Ziparo, an Infant, by Antoinette Ciannilli, His Mother and Natural Guardian, Appellant, v Hartwells Garage et al., Defendants, and Atlas Transportation, Inc., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, with costs, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: We do not believe that the jury could have reached its verdict—that of a verdict of no cause for action against a 15-year-old bicyclist who was standing on the shoulder of the road when struck by a tractor trailer—upon any fair interpretation of the evidence *(Mullen*v *Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co.,*71 AD2d 21). We thus conclude that the jury verdict in this case was against the weight of the credible evidence. The uncontradicted proof demonstrated that the driver of the tractor trailer on a clear, bright day came to and stopped at an intersection. At that time the plaintiff was standing on the shoulder of the road waiting for the light to change. Thereafter, the truck driver proceeded to make a right-hand turn and in so doing caused the trailer to strike the standing cyclist and throw him beneath the rear wheels of the trailer where he sustained serious and permanent injuries. The driver’s actions violated those provisions of the *998Vehicle and Traffic Law which state that a right turn shall be made "as close as practicable to the right hand curb or edge of the roadway” (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1160, subd [a]) and provide that "No person shall turn a vehicle at an intersection unless the vehicle is in proper position upon the roadway as required in [§ 1160, subd (a)] * * * or otherwise turn a vehicle from a direct course or move right or left upon a roadway unless and until such movement can be made with *reasonable safety”*(Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1163, subd [a]; emphasis supplied). The only testimony before the jury was that the driver of the tractor trailer "cut the corner”. The driver was unaware that he had struck the infant plaintiff until he was later stopped by a passerby. The violations of these statutory provisions establish negligence. Further, there is no basis for a finding that plaintiff was contributorily negligent. The plaintiff when struck was standing straddling his bicycle on the gravel shoulder of the highway where he had a legal right to be. No evidence was presented which showed that there was any way in which plaintiff could have avoided the accident. Under these circumstances, there must be a new trial. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Supreme Court—negligence.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
EXHIBIT 2.3  CONFIDENTIAL  Redacted. Confidential Treatment of redacted portions requested of the Securities and Exchange Commission.   AMENDMENT TO ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT is made as of December 31, 2008 to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 22, 2008 (the "Agreement"), by and among Greentree Capital Management, L.L.C. ("Seller"), Peter J. Gaess ("Principal"), T.C. Lewis (for the purposes of Section 3.02 only) ("Lewis") and The Canandaigua National Bank and Trust Company ("Buyer"). The parties hereto agree that Schedule 1.04 as originally attached to the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced to read in its entirety as follows: Schedule 1.04Illustration of Adjusted Purchase Price Calculation [*]


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have duly executed this Amendment on December 31, 2008.  BUYER: THE CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY By: ___________________________
      George W. Hamlin, IV 
      President and CEO  SELLER: GREENTREE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.  By: ___________________________
      Peter J. Gaess
      Principal PRINCIPAL: ________________________________ Peter J. Gaess  Endnotes    2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 23, 2010.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:

*1. TXRB Holdings, Inc.,*                     Dallas, Texas; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Texas Republic Bank, N.A., Frisco, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 23, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-29999 Filed 11-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of BioFuel Energy, Corp. (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kelly G. Maguire, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





March 29, 2011
/s/ Kelly MaguireKelly G. Maguire

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John D. Schiller, certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Particle DrillingTechnologies, Inc.;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of , andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c.     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ifinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b.     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:                   | May 11, 2005 |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------|--------|
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ John D. Schiller    |              |   |
| John D. Schiller        |              |
| Chief Executive Officer |              |

 

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
      to U.S.C. Section 1350


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**




I,
      Robert
      S. Ellin, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of
      Zane Acquisition II, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that the annual
      report on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 of
      Zane Acquisition II, Inc. (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Zane Acquisition II, Inc.




Dated:
      March 31, 2008


/s/
                Robert S. EllinRobert
                S. Ellin
              Director
                and
              Chief
                Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      by
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and shall be furnished
      to
      the SEC or its staff upon request.
#### § 58.730 Filling containers.

Hot fluid cheese from the cookers may be held in hotwells or hoppers to assure a constant and even supply of processed cheese to the filler or slice former. Filler valves shall effectively measure the desired amount of product into the pouch or container in a sanitary manner and shall cut off sharply without drip or drag of cheese across the opening. An effective system shall be used to maintain accurate and precise weight control. Damaged or unsatisfactory packages shall be removed from production, and the cheese may be salvaged into sanitary containers, and added back to cookers.