alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Particle Drilling
Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason D. Davis, Interim Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
      JASON D. DAVISJason
      D. DavisInterim
      Chief Financial OfficerDate:
            February
      9, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S..C. § 1350
as adopted by
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
    FNB Banking Company (the
“Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                                                                       



|Dated: November 10, 2004 | /s/ J. Charles Copeland
J. Charles Copeland
 President and
 Chief Executive Officer
 (Chief Executive Officer)
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |                                                                                                               
|Dated: November 10, 2004 | /s/ Mark Flowers
Mark Flowers
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
# L_2014267EN.01000801.xml

| 6.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 267/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 267/8

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUFOR RCA/5/2014

of 24 July 2014

on the acceptance of third States' contributions to the European Union military operation in the Central African Republic (EUFOR RCA)

(2014/646/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2014/73/CFSP of 10 February 2014 on a European Union military operation in the Central African Republic (EUFOR RCA) (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2014/73/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of proposed contributions by third States. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2014/73/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of proposed contributions by third States.

| (2) | Following the recommendation on a contribution from Serbia by the EUFOR RCA Operation Commander and the advice from the European Union Military Committee, the contribution from Serbia should be accepted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following the recommendation on a contribution from Serbia by the EUFOR RCA Operation Commander and the advice from the European Union Military Committee, the contribution from Serbia should be accepted.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   The contribution from Serbia to the European Union military operation in the Central African Republic (EUFOR RCA) is accepted and is considered to be significant.

2.   Serbia is exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUFOR RCA.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 24 July 2014.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 40, 11.2.2014, p. 59.

1

---
# L_2014044EN.01005201.xml

| 14.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 44/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 44/52

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 11 February 2014

amending Decision 2009/1014/EU appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015

(2014/83/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the request of the Spanish Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009, the Council adopted Decision 2009/1014/EU (1) appointing, in particular, the Spanish members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009, the Council adopted Decision 2009/1014/EU (1) appointing, in particular, the Spanish members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | Mr Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO has been a member of the Committee of the Regions as from 26 January 2010 and was appointed as President of the Autonomous Community of the Region of Murcia in accordance with the proposal of the Kingdom of Spain (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Mr Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO has been a member of the Committee of the Regions as from 26 January 2010 and was appointed as President of the Autonomous Community of the Region of Murcia in accordance with the proposal of the Kingdom of Spain (2).

| (3) | By letter of 8 January 2014, the Spanish Permanent Representation informed the Council that Mr Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO is an elected member of the Regional Assembly of the Region of Murcia in addition to being President of the Autonomous Community of the Region of Murcia and that the Spanish authorities requested that Decision 2009/1014/EU be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

By letter of 8 January 2014, the Spanish Permanent Representation informed the Council that Mr Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO is an elected member of the Regional Assembly of the Region of Murcia in addition to being President of the Autonomous Community of the Region of Murcia and that the Spanish authorities requested that Decision 2009/1014/EU be amended accordingly.

| (4) | Mr Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO held both these mandates at the time of the adoption of Decision 2009/1014/EU. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Mr Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO held both these mandates at the time of the adoption of Decision 2009/1014/EU.

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Annex I of Decision 2009/1014/EU, the entry concerning D. Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO is hereby replaced as follows:

‘D. Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO

Presidente de la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia y Diputado de la Asamblea Regional de Murcia’
  .

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 11 February 2014.

For the Council

The President

E. VENIZELOS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  Letter of 3 December 2009.

2

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0029

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TERESA MOCKO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 5, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 28 2023

07/28/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0029
Exhibit
32.1
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
   SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Annual Report of Phoenix Energy Resource Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:
December 18,
2009                                                                  By: /s/ Rene
Soullier
 Rene
Soullier
 President , Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial
 Officer , Principal Accounting Officer,
Secretary,
 Treasurer,
Director
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 0089 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM166AD

747 - 24A2360 --- 1/18/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 279 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 279

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Act of June 7, 1924, to provide for the exercise of 
                         criminal jurisdiction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INDIAN PUEBLO LAND ACT AMENDMENTS.

    The Act of June 7, 1924 (43 Stat. 636, chapter 331), is amended by 
adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 20. CRIMINAL JURISDICTION.

    ``(a) In General.--Except as otherwise provided by Congress, 
jurisdiction over offenses committed anywhere within the exterior 
boundaries of any grant from a prior sovereign, as confirmed by 
Congress or the Court of Private Land Claims to a Pueblo Indian tribe 
of New Mexico, shall be as provided in this section.
    ``(b) Jurisdiction of the Pueblo.--The Pueblo has jurisdiction, as 
an act of the Pueblos' inherent power as an Indian tribe, over any 
offense committed by a member of the Pueblo or an Indian as defined in 
title 25, sections 1301(2) and 1301(4), or by any other Indian-owned 
entity.
    ``(c) Jurisdiction of the United States.--The United States has 
jurisdiction over any offense described in chapter 53 of title 18, 
United States Code, committed by or against an Indian as defined in 
title 25, sections 1301(2) and 1301(4) or any Indian-owned entity, or 
that involves any Indian property or interest.
    ``(d) Jurisdiction of the State of New Mexico.--The State of New 
Mexico shall have jurisdiction over any offense committed by a person 
who is not a member of a Pueblo or an Indian as defined in title 25, 
sections 1301(2) and 1301(4), which offense is not subject to the 
jurisdiction of the United States.''.

            Passed the Senate July 26, 2005.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### Menne Nursery Corporation, Formerly Known as Menn-Stan Corp., Inc., Appellant, v Rebco Steel Corp., Inc., et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

— Appeal dismissed as moot. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court — reargument.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Doerr, JJ.
Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF Document 54-1 Filed 07/14/22 Page 1 of 3
Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF Document 54-1 Filed 07/14/22 Page 2 of 3
Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF Document 54-1 Filed 07/14/22 Page 3 of 3
52.237 [Reserved]

52.237-1 Site Visit.

52.237-2 Protection of Government Buildings, Equipment, and Vegetation.

52.237-3 Continuity of Services.

52.237-4 Payment by Government to Contractor.

52.237-5 Payment by Contractor to Government.

52.237-6 Incremental Payment by Contractor to Government.

52.237-7 Indemnification and Medical Liability Insurance.

52.237-8 Restriction on Severance Payments to Foreign Nationals.

52.237-9 Waiver of Limitation on Severance Payments to Foreign Nationals.

52.237-10 Identification of Uncompensated Overtime.

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 4 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 5 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 6 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 7 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 8 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 9 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 10 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 11 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 12 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-23 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 13 of 13
|Study Team Members                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|Wilett Bunton, National Performance Review
Sheila L. Brand, National Security Agency
Desiree Cross-Gibson, Social Security Administration
Linda Delano, Financial Management Services
Judith Diaz-Myers, Bureau of Engraving and Printing
Jack Frost, Department of Veterans Affairs
Pete Gagnon, Department of Education
Saul Goldberg, Defense Logistics Agency
Kimberly Howze, Bureau of Engraving and Printing
Michael Hydorn, Patent and Trademark Office
Gilbert Leigh, Department of Justice
Linda Nivens, Department of Labor 
Cindy Petitt, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
#### § 65.220 Processed food item.

*Processed food item* means a retail item derived from a covered commodity that has undergone specific processing resulting in a change in the character of the covered commodity, or that has been combined with at least one other covered commodity or other substantive food component (e.g., chocolate, breading, tomato sauce), except that the addition of a component (such as water, salt, or sugar) that enhances or represents a further step in the preparation of the product for consumption, would not in itself result in a processed food item. Specific processing that results in a change in the character of the covered commodity includes cooking (e.g., frying, broiling, grilling, boiling, steaming, baking, roasting), curing (e.g., salt curing, sugar curing, drying), smoking (hot or cold), and restructuring (e.g., emulsifying and extruding). Examples of items excluded include roasted peanuts, breaded chicken tenders, and fruit medley.

[81 FR 10761, Mar. 2, 2016]
|     |  |             
|---- |  | ------------
|LOGO |  | Exhibit 33.1



| |  |  |  |                        
| |  |  |  | -----------------------
| |  |  |  | Genworth Life & Annuity
| |  |  |  | 6610 West Broad Street 
| |  |  |  | Richmond, VA 23230     



Management
Assessment



Management of Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company (the
Company) is responsible for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission for the Genworth Global Funding Trusts (the Platform) except for servicing
criteria 1, 2, 3(ii), 3(iii), 3(iv) and 4, which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Appendix A identifies the individual
asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform.



The Companys management has assessed the effectiveness of the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. In making this assessment,
management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.



Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company has complied in all material respects with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(3)(i) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the servicing of the Platform. The Company has determined all other requirements listed in Item 1122(d) as being inapplicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions being serviced.



KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to managements assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December
31, 2006.



/s/ John A. ZelinskeJohn A. ZelinskeVice President and ControllerMarch 29, 2007




---

Appendix A



Genworth Global Funding Trust 2005-A

Genworth
Global Funding Trust 2006-A

Genworth Global Funding Trust 2006-B

Genworth Global Funding Trust 2006-C

Genworth Global Funding Trust 2006-D

Genworth Global Funding Trust 2006-E

Genworth Global Funding Trust 2006-F

Genworth Global Funding Trust 2006-G
#### In the Matter of Gail Murtaugh, Individually and Doing Business as Crosby Hill Auto Racing, et al., Appellants, v New York State Department of Environmental Conservation et al., Respondents. State of New York et al., Respondents, v Gail Murtaugh, Individually and Doing Business as Crosby Hill Auto Racing, et al., Appellants.

(Proceeding No. 1.)

(Proceeding No. 2.)

Submitted September 4, 2007;

decided November 15, 2007

Reported below, 42 AD3d 986.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

NELSON RIVERA,

D.O.C. # X73975,

 Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv532–WS/MAF

JENNIFER KYER, RN,

EDWARD HAND, HA, 

VALERI HOUCK, PA, and

ALEXIS ACOSTA-MARTINEZ, MD,

 Defendants.

 

AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's second report and recommendation

(ECF No. 48) docketed February 13, 2023. The magistrate judge recommends that

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted. Plaintiff has filed no

objections to the report and recommendation.

Having reviewed the matter, the undersigned has determined that the report

and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Case 4:20-cv-00532-WS-MAF Document 51 Filed 03/16/23 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. The order (ECF No. 49) and judgment (ECF No. 50) entered on March 14,

2023, are VACATED.

2. The magistrate judge’s second report and recommendation (ECF No. 48)

is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order of the court. 

3. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 39) is DENIED.

4. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 37) is GRANTED.

5. Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) and this case are DISMISSED.

6. The clerk shall enter an amended judgment stating: “Judgment is entered

in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.” 

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of March , 2023.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00532-WS-MAF Document 51 Filed 03/16/23 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 559-3 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 1 of 1