alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: HolmesAems@aol.com [mailto:HolmesAems@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 2:46 PM

To: Fruh, Steve; Cozzie, David; Jones, Toni; Barnett, Keith; Nizich, Sharon

Cc: tharman@cement.org; satish.sheth@cemex.com

Subject: Meeting with PCA on Wednesday

All,

In preparation for the meeting this coming Wednesday at your offices, I have attached a proposed 

agenda. Let me know if you have any additions. Also, I am hoping you can set up a call-in number for a 

few PCA members that are not able to attend in person. Lastly, here is the list of attendees.

 Curtis Lesslie, Ash Grove 

 Jay Willis, Titan America 

 Satish Sheth, Cemex 

 Tom Harman, PCA 

 John Holmes, AEMS 

 Brett Lindsay, Phoenix Cement 

 Michael Pelan, LaFarge 

 Tim Matz, Lehigh Hanson

See you Wednesday 

John Holmes
Proposed Agenda for the September 17th Meeting between PCA members and EPA on Corrections and 

Clarifications of NSPS, NESHAP and CISWI Requirements

NSPS and NESHAP

Key Discussion Topics

 Startup and Shutdown Control Device Requirements

 NSPS crosslink to NESHAP on opacity monitoring for transfer points

 Reinstating prior NSPS limits, without CPMS applying retroactively

 NESHAP cooler stack flow monitoring

 Status and concerns with PS-18

Quick review of the remaining items on the PCA list of July 7th

Action items coming out of the discussion.

CISWI

Key Discussion Topics:

 Reconsideration of the PM limit

 Startup and Shutdown requirements

 Requirements for commingled sources

Quick review of the remaining items on the PCA list of July 7th

Action items coming out of the discussion.
#### § 51.1435 Size classifications for halves.

The size of pecan halves in a lot may be specified in accordance with one of the size classifications shown in table 1 to this section.

(a) *Halves per pound.* The number of halves per pound shall be based upon the weight of half-kernels after all pieces, meal and flour, shell, center wall, and foreign material have been removed.

(b) *Tolerance for count per pound.* In order to allow for variations incident to proper sizing, a tolerance shall be permitted as follows:

(1) When an exact number of halves per pound is specified, the actual count per pound may vary not more than 5 percent from the specified number, and

(2) When any size classification shown in table 1 to this section or a range in count per pound is specified, no tolerance shall be allowed for counts outside of the specified range.

(c) *Tolerances for pieces, meal, and flour.* In order to allow for variations incident to proper sizing and handling, tolerances are provided for pieces, meal, and flour in any lot of halves. The tolerances, by weight, are as shown in table 2 to this section.

Table 1 to [§ 51.1435](/on/2024-09-16/title-7/section-51.1435)

| Size classification for halves | Number of halves @per pound |
| --- | --- |
| Mammoth | 250 or less. |
| Junior Mammoth | 251-350. |
| Jumbo | 351-450. |
| Large | 451-550. |
| Medium | 551-650. |
| Topper | 651-750. |
| King Topper | 751 or more. |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| In lieu of the size classifications in this table, the size of pecan halves in a lot may be specified in terms of the number of halves or a range of number of halves per pound. For example, “400” or “600-700.” | |

Table 2 to [§ 51.1435](/on/2024-09-16/title-7/section-51.1435)

| Tolerances for pieces, meal, and flour | U.S. extra fancy premier halves (%) | U.S. extra fancy halves (%) | U.S. fancy halves (%) | U.S. choice halves (%) | U.S. standard halves (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| A. Less than 7/8 half-kernel | 10 | | | | |
| B. Less than 3/4 half-kernel | | 10 | 15 | 20 | 20 |
| C. Less than 1/2 half-kernel (included in A.—U.S. Extra Fancy Premier Halves) (included in B.—U.S. Extra Fancy Halves, U.S. Fancy Halves, U.S. Choice Halves, and U.S. Standard Halves) | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| D. Less than 4/64′′ (included in C.) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Sujal Patel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Isilon Systems, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Isilon Systems, Inc.





Dated:
      February 18, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      SUJAL PATELName:
            Sujal
      PatelTitle:
            President,
      Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal
      Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Furia Organization, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2002 (the
"Report"), I, Martin Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Martin Cohen
-----------------------
Martin Cohen
Chief Executive Officer

November 12, 2002
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:97cr85-01/LAC

DWIGHT M. SPENCER

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on April 5, 2010 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re [161] Order on Motion FOR

RELIEF PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 60(b)(2)(3) 

Filed by DEFENDANT on 3/10/2010 Doc.# 164

RESPONSES:

 NONE on Doc.# 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 8 day of

th

April, 2010, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b)

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge
```

[106th Congress Public Law 238]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ238.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 491]]

Public Law 106-238
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 100 Orchard Park Drive in Greenville, South Carolina, as the ``Keith 
      D. Oglesby Station''. <<NOTE: July 6, 2000 -  [H.R. 2952]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 100 
Orchard Park Drive in Greenville, South Carolina, and known as the 
Orchard Park Station, shall be known and designated as the ``Keith D. 
Oglesby Station''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Keith D. Oglesby Station''.

    Approved July 6, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2952:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: Vol. 146 (2000):
            Mar. 8, considered and passed House.
            June 23, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Amdmt No 3 to Registrant's Second Amended and Restated 2005 Omnibus Stock Plan



 Exhibit 10.4 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO THE 
 VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. 
 SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 2005 OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN 
 Varian
Medical Systems, Inc. having previously established the Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2005 Omnibus Stock Plan (the “Plan”), hereby amends the Plan as follows: 
 1. Effective as of February 12, 2009, Section 4.1 is amended by the insertion of the following before the last sentence of Section 4.1:

 Effective upon approval of this amendment by the stockholders of the Company, an additional 4.2 million Shares shall be available for
issuance under the Plan. 
 2. Effective November 14, 2008, the following is added as Section 10.14 of the Plan: 
 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Plan or any Award Agreement, in the event of a restatement of incorrect financial results,
the Board will review the conduct of executive officers in relation to the restatement. If the Board determines that an executive officer has engaged in misconduct or other violations of the Company’s code of ethics in
connection with the restatement, the Board would, in its discretion, take appropriate action to remedy the misconduct, including, without limitation, seeking reimbursement of any portion of performance-based or incentive compensation
paid or awarded to the executive under the Plan that is greater than would have been paid or awarded if calculated based on the restated financial results, to the extent not prohibited by governing law. For this purpose, the term
“executive officer” means executive officers as defined by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such action by the Board would be in addition to any other actions the Board or the Company may take under the Company’s
policies, as modified from time to time, or any actions imposed by law enforcement, regulators or other authorities. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Varian Medical Systems, Inc., by its duly authorized officer, has executed the Plan on the date indicated below. 
  

									
		 		 	Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
				
	Dated: February 12, 2009	 		 	By:	 	/s/ John W. Kuo
		 		 		 		 	John W. Kuo
		 		 		 		 	Corporate Vice President,
		 		 		 		 	General Counsel & Secretary
50.000 Scope of part.       This part-                                       (a)                                                         (1) 								                Prescribes policies and procedures for entering into, amending, or modifying contracts in order to facilitate the national defense under the extraordinary emergency authority granted by Public Law 85-804 (50 U. S.C. 1431-1434) and Executive Order 10789, dated November 14, 1958. It does not cover advance payments (see subpart  32.4); and                                                            (2) 								                Implements indemnification authority granted by Pub. L. 85-804 and paragraph 1 A of E.O. 10789 with respect to any matter that has been, or could be, designated by the Secretary of Homeland Security as a qualified anti-terrorism technology as defined in the Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002 (SAFETY Act); and                                                                             (b) 						            Implements SAFETY Act liability protections to promote development and use of anti-terrorism technologies.    **Parent topic:** Part 50 - Extraordinary Contractual Actions and the safety act
```

[107th Congress Public Law 242]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ242.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 1497]]

Public Law 107-242
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To amend the charter of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United 
  States organization to make members of the armed forces who receive 
special pay for duty subject to hostile fire or imminent danger eligible 
for membership in the organization, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 
                       16, 2002 -  [H.R. 3838]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES 
            CHARTER.

    (a) Eligibility for Membership of Individuals Receiving Special Pay 
for Duty Subject to Hostile Fire or Imminent Danger.--Section 230103 of 
title 36, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (1);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (2) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) in an area which entitled the individual to receive 
        special pay for duty subject to hostile fire or imminent danger 
        under section 310 of title 37.''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PURPOSES OF THE CORPORATION.

    Section 230102 of such title is amended in the matter preceding 
paragraph (1) by inserting ``charitable,'' before ``and educational,''.

    Approved October 16, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3838:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107-570 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            July 15, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 2, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of SkyTerra
Communications, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alexander H. Good, Chief Executive Officer and President
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Alexander H. Good                
|Alexander H. Good                    
|Chief Executive Officer and President

February 12, 2008
Page
                Twenty One





**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Statement
      of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.**§
**1350**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
      ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as the chief executive officer
      of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/
                C.E. PorterC.E.
                PorterChief
                Executive OfficerMay
                7, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          20,273
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      2,023
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          57,845
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            57,436
<LOANS>                                        224,333
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 319,555
<DEPOSITS>                                     294,902
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                865
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,436
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 319,555
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,414
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  940
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    97
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,451
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,132
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,224
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,227
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      399
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    911
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         911
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       561
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.21
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,457
<LOANS-PAST>                                       645
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  8,232
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,043
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       74
<RECOVERIES>                                        83
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,451
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,451
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,387
        

</TABLE>
31.205-10 Cost of money.

(a) General. Cost of money-

(1) Is an imputed cost that is not a form of interest on borrowings (see 31.205-20);

(2) Is an "incurred cost" for cost-reimbursement purposes under applicable cost-reimbursement

contracts and for progress payment purposes under fixed-price contracts; and

(3) Refers to-

(i) Facilities capital cost of money (48 CFR9904.414); and

(ii) Cost of money as an element of the cost of capital assets under construction (48 CFR9904.417).

(b) Cost of money is allowable, provided-

(1) It is measured, assigned, and allocated to contracts in accordance with 48 CFR9904.414 or

measured and added to the cost of capital assets under construction in accordance with 48

CFR9904.417, as applicable;

(2) The requirements of 31.205-52, which limit the allowability of cost of money, are followed; and

(3) The estimated facilities capital cost of money is specifically identified and proposed in cost

proposals relating to the contract under which the cost is to be claimed.

(c) Actual interest cost in lieu of the calculated imputed cost of money is unallowable.

Parent topic: 31.205 Selected costs.
#### § 58.321 Cream storage tanks.

Cream storage tanks shall meet the requirements of § 58.128(d). Cream storage tanks for continuous churns should be equipped with effective temperature controls and recording devices.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RHONDA FLEMING,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv545–WS/MJF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

and WARDEN ERICA STRONG,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (ECF

No. 243) dated April 26, 2023. The magistrate judge recommends that the

undersigned grant Defendants’ motion to stay this cause pending disposition of

Warden Erica Strong’s interlocutory appeal pending before the Eleventh Circuit.

Plaintiff has filed objections (ECF No. 244) to the report and recommendation.

Having reviewed the record, the undersigned concludes—as did the

magistrate judge—that a stay of proceedings is appropriate. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 247 Filed 05/17/23 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. Defendant’s motion to stay (ECF No. 235) is GRANTED.

2. Proceedings in this case are STAYED until the Eleventh Circuit resolves 

Warden Erica Strong’s interlocutory appeal.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of May , 2023.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 247 Filed 05/17/23 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 57
Editorial Note: 1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

§ 57.1000 Administrative proceedings. ( a ) The Uniform Rules of Practice for the Department of Agriculture promulgated in subpart H of part 1, subtitle A, title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, are the Rules of Practice applicable to adjudicating administrative proceedings under section 12(c) of the Egg Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 1041).
( b ) In addition to the proceedings set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, the Administrator, at any time prior to the issuance of a complaint seeking a civil penalty under the Act may enter into a stipulation with any person, in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( 1 ) The Administrator gives notice of an apparent violation of the Act or the regulations issued thereunder by such person and affords such person an opportunity for a hearing regarding the matter as provided by the Act;
( 2 ) Such person expressly waives hearing and agrees to a specified order including an agreement to pay a specified civil penalty within a designated time; and
( 3 ) The Administrator agrees to accept the specified civil penalty in settlement of the particular matter involved if it is paid within the designated time.
( 4 ) If the specified penalty is not paid within the time designated in such stipulation, the amount of the stipulated penalty shall not be relevant in any respect to the penalty that may be assessed after the institution of a formal administrative proceeding pursuant to the Uniform Rules of Practice, Subpart H, Part 1, Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations.
[64 FR 40738, July 28, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 57168, Sept. 24, 2004]