alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

        We consent to the use of our report dated February 27, 1997 with
    respect to the financial statements of RETEC/TETRA L.C. as of December
    31, 1996 and 1995 and for the years then ended included in this Annual
    Report (Form 10-K) of Thermo TerraTech Inc. for the year ended March 29,
    1997.

        We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
    Registration Statements of Thermo TerraTech Inc. and each related
    Prospectus of our report dated February 27, 1997 with respect to the
    financial statements of RETEC/TETRA L.C. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995
    and for the years then ended included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
    for the year ended March 29, 1997.

                Registration Statement No. 33-16462 on Form S-8
                Registration Statement No. 33-16464 on Form S-8
                Registration Statement No. 33-16465 on Form S-8
                Registration Statement No. 33-31478 on Form S-3
                Registration Statement No. 33-52824 on Form S-8
                Registration Statement No. 33-65283 on Form S-8
                Registration Statement No. 33-65281 on Form S-8
                Registration Statement No. 333-02269 on Form S-2
                Registration Statement No. 33-16466 on Form S-8
                Registration Statement No. 333-2055 on Form S-3
                Registration Statement No. 033-65307 on Form S-8
                Registration Statement No. 33-86194 on Form S-8



                                                     Ernst & Young LLP



    Houston, Texas
    June 4, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2473 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2473

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Violet 11 Dye.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2006

  Mr. DeWine introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Violet 11 Dye.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BASIC VIOLET 11 DYE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking subheading 
9902.70.03 and inserting in numerical sequence the following new 
heading:

``      9902.32.13       Basic Violet 11    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Dye (CAS No. 2390-                                                 31/2009
                         63-8) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         3204.13.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I,
Michael Juhasz, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Guinness
Exploration Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:




(1)   The Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended May 31, 2008 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods covered in the Report.






/s/
Michael Juhasz


Michael
Juhasz


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer




August
28, 2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 51.2115 Application of tolerances.

The tolerances for the grades are to be applied to the entire lot, and a composite sample shall be taken for determining the grade. However, any container or group of containers in which the almonds are found to be materially inferior to those in the majority of the containers shall be considered a separate lot.
# Subpart 11.8 - Testing

**Parent topic:**Part 11 - Describing Agency Needs

## 11.801 Preaward in-use evaluation.

*Supplies**may* be evaluated under comparable in-use conditions without a further test plan, provided *offerors* are so advised in the *solicitation*. The results of such tests or demonstrations *may* be used to rate the proposal, to determine technical acceptability, or otherwise to evaluate the proposal (see 15.305).
#### Joseph H. Molat, Respondent, v. Grant Singletary et al., Appellants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal and property injuries, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 2, 1968 and made after a pretrial hearing, which directed that the action be preferred for .trial pursuant to rule 8 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Kings County (22 NYCRR 750.8), and pursuant to CPLR 3403 (subd. [a], par. 3). Order reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs and without prejudice to any future application for a preference. The record before us does not contain either a stenographic transcript of the record of the pretrial hearing or a proper factual basis for an order granting a trial preference *(John*v. *Sackette Elec. Co.,*28 A D 2d 1128; *Abramson*v. *Kenwood Labs.,*17 A D 2d 626). Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
§ 371.6 Wildlife Services. ( a ) *General statement.* Wildlife Services (WS) manages problems caused by wildlife.
( b ) *Deputy Administrator of WS.* The Deputy Administrator of WS is responsible for: ( 1 ) Participating with the Administrator of APHIS and other officials in the planning and formulation of policies, programs, procedures, and activities of APHIS.
( 2 ) Providing direction and coordination for programs authorized by the Act of March 2, 1931 (7 U.S.C. 426 and 426b, as amended) and the Act of December 22, 1987 (7 U.S.C. 426c).
( 3 ) Assisting Federal, State, local, and foreign agencies and individuals with regard to wildlife damage and control.
( 4 ) Conducting research to develop wildlife damage management methods.
[65 FR 1299, Jan. 10, 2000, as amended at 69 FR 76379, Dec. 21, 2004]
#### § 58.341 Repackaging.

When officially graded or inspected bulk product is to be repackaged into consumer type packages for official grade labeling or other official identification, a supervisor of packaging shall be required and the plant, equipment, facilities and personnel shall meet the same specifications as outlined in this part, including such markings or identification as may be required.
§ 51.3055 Standard pack. ( a ) The avocados shall be packed in accordance with good commercial practice and the pack shall be at least fairly tight. The weight of the smallest fruit in any container shall be not less than 75 percent of the weight of the largest fruit in the container. Size of the avocados may be specified by count.
( b ) In order to allow for variations incident to proper sizing and packing, not more than 5 percent, by count, of the avocados in any container may weigh less than 75 percent of the weight of the largest fruit: *Provided,* That no fruit in any container shall weigh less than 60 percent of the weight of the largest fruit in the container. In addition, not more than 5 percent of the containers in any lot may fail to meet the requirement as to tightness of pack.
Exhibit 23.1




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We have issued our reports dated March 16, 2011 (except for Note 3 of the consolidated financial statements and matters discussed in the 4th paragraph of Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting as to which the date is May 6, 2011), with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting of Essex Rental Corp. and Subsidiaries and the consolidated statement of income, cash flows and members’ equity of Essex Holdings, LLC on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Essex Rental Corp. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-138452, effective May 21, 2009), Form S-8 (File No. 333-161332, effective August 13, 2009) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-171387, effective February 10, 2011).







/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLPGrant Thornton LLP





Chicago, Illinois


May 6, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         428,621
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,654,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,611,820
<INVENTORY>                                 46,039,357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            69,596,576
<PP&E>                                      29,145,625
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,212,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             101,428,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,894,097
<BONDS>                                      5,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,649
<OTHER-SE>                                  54,072,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               101,428,688
<SALES>                                    122,634,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           131,759,929
<CGS>                                       97,123,066
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               97,123,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,263,686
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               965,288
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,086,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,321,181
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,361,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,960,181
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,960,181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
        

</TABLE>
#### § 56.75 Applicability of facility and operating requirements.

The provisions of § 56.76 shall be applicable to any grading service that is provided on a resident or temporary basis.

[69 FR 76376, Dec. 21, 2004]
#### § 51.7 Form of application.

Each application for inspection service shall state (a) the name and address of the applicant and the name and capacity of the person, if any, making the application in his behalf; (b) the name and address of the shipper; (c) the kind and quantity of the products involved; (d) the interest of the applicant therein; (e) the identification of the products by (1) grade, brand, or other marks, if practicable, (2) car number of carrier or number of truck or name of boat, if practicable, and (3) the name and location of the store, warehouse, or other place where the products are located; (f) the particular quality or condition concerning which inspection is requested, to which may be added the time and place at which it is desired that the inspection be made; (g) when the lot is to be inspected in a receiving market, the name and address of the receiver; (h) the name of the shipping point and of the destination, when known; and (i) such other information as may be necessary for identification of the product, or as may be required by the inspector or the Administrator.
EXHIBIT 35.1

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC

                RASC SERIES 2006-KS8 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of September 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),
among  Residential  Asset  Securities  Corporation,  as  depositor,  Residential
Funding  Company,  LLC (formerly  Residential  Funding  Corporation),  as master
servicer,  and U.S. Bank National  Association,  as trustee, does hereby certify
that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material  respects  throughout
such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:    /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
       Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
       Title: Managing Director
#### Francis McDonnell, Respondent, v. Sir Prize Contracting Corporation et al., Appellants.

In a holdover proceeding to recover possession of a dwelling apartment, the tenant and undertenants appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Term, Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, dated December 20, 1968, which affirmed a final judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Queens, dated March 20, 1968, in favor of the landlord. Order and final judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and petition dismissed, without costs. This determination is without prejudice to such application as the landlord may choose to make under sections 54 or 59 of the New York City Rent, Eviction and Rehabilitation Regulations. In our opinion, the landlord failed to establish that the violation in question can be removed only by eviction of the tenant and undertenants or that compliance with the legal requirements would be unduly burdensome or economically improviden0t *(Matter of K & G Co.*v. *Reyes,*52 Misc 2d 606, 609; *Grier*v. *Fenty,*13 Misc 2d 542, 543; *H.I.M. Props. Corp.*v. *Gross,*6 Misc 2d 666, 668; *H. Casabianca, Inc.*v. *Connobbio,*205 Misc. 380, 383-384). There is no dispute that the tenant and undertenants did not create the condition which caused the violation *(816 Fifth Ave.*v. *Purdy,*127 N. Y. S. 2d 695, 696.) It is also our opinion that the landlord’s good faith in seeking eviction under subdivision e of section 52 of the New York City Rent, Eviction and Rehabilitation Regulations is a matter of relevant inquiry. Subdivision b of section 51 of the Regulations prohibits an attempt to remove a tenant because he has taken action authorized by the Rent Law or the regulations. Subdivision c of section 52 may not be used as a pretext for doing what subdivision b of section 51 forbids. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the
“Report”) of Zulu Energy Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30,
      2007, the undersigned Paul Stroud, the Chief Executive Officer, and James
      Hostetler, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of each of the undersigned’s
      knowledge and belief:




(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                June 2, 2008
            */s/
                Paul Stroud*Paul
                Stroud, President andChief
                Executive OfficerDated:
                June 2, 2008
            */s/
                James Hostetler*James
                Hostetler, Executive Vice President, Secretary,Treasurer,
                Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
                Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

** **

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 155 East Tropicana, LLC, a Nevadalimited-liability company and 155 East Tropicana Finance Corp., a Nevadacorporation (collectively, the “Company”) for the three months ended September 30,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Deborah J. Pierce, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Deborah J. Pierce   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |
| Deborah  J. Pierce,      |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |
| November 14,  2008  |   |

 

 

The foregoing certificationsare being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and are not being filedas part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
29.402-1 Foreign fixed-price contracts.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.229-6, Taxes-Foreign Fixed-Price Contracts,

in solicitations and contracts expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold when a fixedprice contract is contemplated and the contract is to be performed wholly or partly in a foreign

country, unless it is contemplated that the contract will be with a foreign government.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.229-7, Taxes-Fixed-Price Contracts with

Foreign Governments, in solicitations and contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold

when a fixed-price contract with a foreign government is contemplated.

Parent topic: 29.402 Foreign contracts.
Unassociated Document


    
      EXHIBIT
10.3

    

     

    No:
C-B-07

    


    


    Hangzhou
Bank Co. Ltd.

    


    Financing
Guarantee Letter

    


    


    


    To:
Shenzhen Branch, Hangzhou Bank Co. Ltd.

    


    I am
willing to provide the debtor Shenzhen SCM Shenzhen Ltd., which signs the
Comprehensive Financing Line Contract (No. 2009SC000000841 ) with irrevocable
jointly and severally guarantee liabilities.

    


    Guarantee
validity: since the starting day of the obligation performance of the principal
contract till 2 years after the expiration date.

    


    Security
range: RMB43,750,000.00 (including bill discounts, acceptance, guarantee,
advance for L/C), interest (including compound interest) and penalty rate,
penalty, compensation and all the notary, evaluation, auction, litigation, legal
expenses occurred in order to recall the creditor rights.

    


    I
recognize and accept the validity of the Comprehensive Financing Line Contract
and this Financing Guarantee Letter, and commit to carry it out conscientiously.
In case of other guarantee or warranty of the principal claim guaranteed besides
that agreed in this Financing Guarantee Letter, it shall not influence any of
your rights and its fulfillment under this Financing Guarantee Letter, and I
shall not raise a plea against you on this basis.

    


    


    


    


    ID
number:__________________________

    


    Address:___________________________

    


    Telephone
No.: ______________________

    


    Postal
Code: ________________________

    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


      Guarantor
(chop): Dehai Li

    /s/ Dehai
Li

    


    April
2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ASHLEY BARNETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and

PAUL ROLSTON,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:20-cv-449-WS-MAF

NOTICE OF A PRIOR OR SIMILAR CASE

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Local Rule 5.6, that the 

following are similar claims: Morton v. United States, et al., 4:18-cv-177-RHMAF, and Alexander v. United States, et al., 4:19-cv-138-RH-MAF.

Respectfully Submitted, s/James V. Cook___________

JAMES V. COOK, ESQ.

Florida Bar Number 966843

Law Office of James Cook

314 West Jefferson Street

Tallahassee, FL 32301

(850) 222-8080; 561-0836 fax

cookjv@gmail.com

RICHARD E. JOHNSON, ESQ.

Florida Bar Number 858323

Law Office of Richard E. Johnson

314 West Jefferson Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32301

(850) 425-1997; 561-0836 fax

rick@rej-law.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 4:20-cv-00449-RH-MAF Document 4 Filed 09/23/20 Page 1 of 1
#### § 51.2961 Well dried.

*Well dried* means that the kernel is firm and crisp, not pliable or leathery.
#### George M. Price, Appellant, v. Ronald G. Calabro, Respondent.

Order, entered July 1, 1968, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, reversed on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the motion granted. There is no denial that a valid gift was made to plaintiff under the Estates, Powers and Trust Law, and there is no right in defendant to withhold the stock. In view of the suggestion of incompeteney, in the interest of justice enforcement of the order to be entered herein is stayed for a period of 30 days, during which time any person entitled to may, if so advised, institute an incompetency proceeding and for the appointment of a committee of the property of the alleged incompetent. In the event such a proceeding is brought during that period, the stay is continued until the final determination thereof; *635otherwise the stay is vacated at the termination of the 30-day period. (Cf. *Sengstack*v. *Sengstack,*4 N Y 2d 502; *Wurster*v. *Armfield, 175*N. Y. 256.) The order entered and notice of entry thereof is to be served by plaintiff’s attorneys on all persons who would be entitled to notice if an incompetency proceeding were commenced. Concur —- Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tilzer, Markewieh and McNally, JJ.