alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA novel multireceiver communications system configuration based on optimal estimation theoryA multireceiver configuration for the purpose of carrier arraying and/or signal arraying is presented. Such a problem arises for example, in the NASA Deep Space Network where the same data-modulated signal from a spacecraft is received by a number of geographically separated antennas and the data detection must be efficiently performed on the basis of the various received signals. The proposed configuration is arrived at by formulating the carrier and/or signal arraying problem as an optimal estimation problem. Two specific solutions are proposed. The first solution is to simultaneously and optimally estimate the various phase processes received at different receivers with coupled phase locked loops (PLLs) wherein the individual PLLs acquire and track their respective receivers' phase processes, but are aided by each other in an optimal manner. However, when the phase processes are relatively weakly correlated, and for the case of relatively high values of symbol energy-to-noise spectral density ratio, a novel configuration for combining the data modulated, loop-output signals is proposed. The scheme can be extended to the case of low symbol energy-to-noise case by performing the combining/detection process over a multisymbol period. Such a configuration results in the minimization of the effective radio loss at the combiner output, and thus a maximization of energy per bit to noise-power spectral density ration is achieved.Document ID19900016900Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKumar, R.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1990Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186847NAS 1.26:186847Accession Number90N26216Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS7-918Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016900.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
36.513 Accident prevention.       (a) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-13, Accident Prevention, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. The contracting officer may insert the clause in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction or a fixed-price contract for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to be at or below the simplified acquisition threshold. If the contract will involve work of a long duration or hazardous nature, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its AlternateI.                                          (b) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause or the clause with its AlternateI in solicitations and contracts when a contract for services to be performed at Government facilities (see 48 CFR Part 37) is contemplated, and technical representatives advise that special precautions are appropriate.                                          (c) 						            The contracting officer should inform the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or other cognizant Federal, State, or local officials, of instances where the contractor has been notified to take immediate action to correct serious or imminent dangers.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Prudential-Bache Equitec Real Estate
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               0000757191
<NAME>              Prudential-Bache Equitec Real Estate
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1997

<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos

<CASH>                          932,000

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   1,288,000

<ALLOWANCES>                    500,000

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0

<PP&E>                          51,606,000

<DEPRECIATION>                  20,119,000

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  33,207,000

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           28,127,000

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      5,080,000

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    33,207,000

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,692,000

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,349,000

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              596,000

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (253,000)

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (3.64)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0


</TABLE>
1

Filed 3/24/22 Salas v. Quinn CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer)

----

TAMARA SALAS,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CYNTHIA QUINN,

Defendant and Appellant.

C092741

(Super. Ct. No. SCV0045096)

Defendant Cynthia Quinn, in propria persona, appeals from a civil harassment 

restraining order entered against her. Because the restraining order expired by its terms 

on January 20, 2021, no appellate relief can be granted. We therefore dismiss the appeal 

as moot.

BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEDURE

In June 2020, plaintiff Tamara Salas filed a petition for a civil harassment 

restraining order (Code Civ. Proc., § 527.6) against defendant Quinn for harassing 

conduct alleged to have occurred over several months beginning in March 2020. Salas

alleged that she was harassed because Quinn believed Salas had an extramarital affair 

with Quinn’s then-boyfriend. 
2

The court held a contested evidentiary hearing on the restraining order on July 20, 

2020. At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court granted the petition and issued a 

restraining order using Judicial Council form CH-130. Quinn appealed from the order. 

DISCUSSION

As a rule, an appeal becomes moot when the occurrence of an event makes it 

impossible for the appellate court to grant any effective relief. (Newsom v. Superior 

Court (2021) 63 Cal.App.5th 1099, 1109; Lincoln Place Tenants Assn. v. City of Los

Angeles (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 425, 454.) “If relief granted by the trial court is 

temporal, and if the relief granted expires before an appeal can be heard, then an appeal 

by the adverse party is moot. [Citation.]” (Environmental Charter High School v. 

Centinela Valley Union High School Dist. (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 139, 144.)

The restraining order that is the subject of this appeal expired, by its own terms, on 

January 20, 2021. As a result, the issue raised in this appeal has been rendered moot. An 

opinion from this court can have no practical impact and provide no effectual relief. 

At our request, Quinn filed a letter brief addressing why the appeal should not be 

dismissed as moot, but she has not presented any reason why we should reach the merits

of this appeal, and we can discern none from the record. Accordingly, we will dismiss 

the appeal.

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed as moot. The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

 KRAUSE , J.

We concur:

 BLEASE , Acting P. J.

 RENNER , J.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of KCAP Financial, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Report), I, Edward U. Gilpin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 18, 2013

          

          By:/s/ Edward U. GilpinEdward U. GilpinChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Larry Joe Clowers Jr. v. Kathleen Ann Dawson

Appellate case number: 01-22-00173-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-84453

Trial court: 189th District Court of Harris County

On April 15, 2022, Appellant, Larry Joe Clowers Jr., filed a “First Unopposed Motion for 

Extension of Time to Make Arrangements to Pay for the Reporter’s Record Until After 

Mediation.” The motion is granted. The deadline for Appellant to notify the Court of payment 

or of payment arrangements for the reporter’s record is June 10, 2022.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Julie Countiss__________

Acting individually 

Date: April 26, 2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LORNA SHANNA KEITH,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 4:20cv435/TKW/EMT

ERICA STRONG, WARDEN,

Respondent.

 /

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 19). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s recommended disposition of this case. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The Second Amended Petition (Doc. 14) is DENIED, and the Clerk 

shall close the file.

DONE and ORDERED this 15th day of March, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00435-TKW-EMT Document 20 Filed 03/15/21 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50322 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus JOE HERRERA-DOMINGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-94-215-DB - - - - - - - - - - January 22, 1996 Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Joe Herrera-Dominguez appeals his convictions for importation of marijuana and possession with the intent to distribute marijuana. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove the requisite knowledge for both offenses. We have reviewed the arguments and the record. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient. AFFIRMED.
#### §§ 5001.460-5001.500 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KENT E. HOVIND, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 3:20-cv-5484-TKW/MJF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This matter was referred to the undersigned by the clerk of the court upon 

Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the court’s order dated July 23, 2020. Plaintiffs 

were ordered to comply with Local Rule 5.7(B) and submit an amended complaint.1

The order imposed a deadline of August 6, 2020. Plaintiffs have failed to comply 

with that order.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. On or before September 8, 2020, Plaintiffs shall show cause—if any—

why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order. 

1 Local Rule 5.7(B) states that a “complaint, together with any memorandum, must 

not exceed 25 pages, unless the Court authorizes it.” Plaintiffs complaint was fiftysix pages in length, and Plaintiffs failed to seek leave to file a complaint in excess of 

the page limitation.

Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 11 Filed 08/24/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with this order likely will result in 

dismissal of this action for failure to comply with a court order and failure to 

prosecute.

SO ORDERED this 24th day of August, 2020.

/s/ Michael J. Frank

Michael J. Frank

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 11 Filed 08/24/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 51.706 Slightly misshapen.

*Slightly misshapen* means that the fruit is not of the shape characteristic of the variety but is not appreciably elongated or pointed or otherwise deformed.
#### § 51.2738 Foreign material.

*Foreign material* means pieces or loose particles of any substance other than peanut kernels or skins.
23.206 Contract clause.

Unless exempt pursuant to 23.204, insert the clause at 52.223-15, Energy Efficiency in EnergyConsuming Products, in solicitations and contracts when energy-consuming products listed in the

ENERGY STAR® Program or FEMP will be-

(a) Delivered;

(b) Acquired by the contractor for use in performing services at a Federally-controlled facility;

(c) Furnished by the contractor for use by the Government; or

(d) Specified in the design of a building or work, or incorporated during its construction, renovation,

or maintenance.

Parent topic: Subpart 23.2 - Energy and Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2622 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 12-Hydroxyoctadecanoic acid, 

reaction product with N,N-dimethyl-1,3-propanediamine, dimethyl sulfate, 

quaternized. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24, 2006 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. DEWINE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 12- 

Hydroxyoctadecanoic acid, reaction product with N,Ndimethyl-1,3-propanediamine, dimethyl sulfate, 

quaternized. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 12-HYDROXYOCTADECANOIC ACID, REACTION 

4 PRODUCT WITH N,N-DIMETHYL-1,3- 

5 PROPANEDIAMINE, DIMETHYL SULFATE, 

6 QUATERNIZED. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.21 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 2622 IS

1 12-Hydroxyoctadecanoic acid, reaction product with N,N2 dimethyl-1,3-propanediamine, dimethyl sulfate, 

3 quaternized) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and in4 serting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

7 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

8 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
|   | 1.   | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |           |                                                                                                                                        |

|   | 2.   | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of the  Registrant. |
|--------|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ DALE      PAISLEY   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Dale      Paisley            |   |   |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer |   |   |   |

----
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:90cr4043-WS

ANTHONY PARKER, 4:05cv370-WS

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 261)

docketed March 14, 2006. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

section 2255 and Rule 60(b) motions be summarily dismissed. The defendant has filed

no objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 261) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

Case 4:90-cr-04043-WS-WCS Document 262 Filed 04/18/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:90cr4043-WS

2. The defendant’s section 2255 motion (doc. 253) and Rule 60(b) motion (doc.

254) are hereby summarily DISMISSED because authorization for filing a second or

successive section 2255 motion has not been granted by the court of appeals. 

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall close Case No.

4:05cv370-WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this April 18, 2006.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:90-cr-04043-WS-WCS Document 262 Filed 04/18/06 Page 2 of 2
# 36.510 Operations and storage areas.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.236-10, Operations and Storage Areas, in *solicitations* and contracts when a fixed-price *construction* contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed the *simplified acquisition threshold*. The *contracting officer**may* insert the clause in *solicitations* and contracts when a fixed-price *construction* or a fixed-price contract for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to be at or below the *simplified acquisition threshold*.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:96-cr-00007-MMP

HOBART RAY CLINE, JR.,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 41, Request for Clarification, filed by Defendant

Hobart Cline, Jr. In the letter, Mr. Cline states that as part of the judgment in his criminal case,

he was ordered to pay restitution to Harry Beckworth. Because Mr. Beckworth is now deceased,

Defendant Cline seeks clarification as to whether he is still required to pay the remaining balance

of the restitution order. When a defendant is ordered to pay restitution to a victim, it is

immaterial to the obligation to pay whether the victim is deceased. Under 18 U.S.C. §

3663A(a)(1) a defendant shall “make restitution to the victim of the offense or, if the victim is

deceased, to the victim’s estate.” Therefore, Defendant has a continuing obligation to make

restitution payments. In this case, if Mr. Beckworth is deceased, then Defendant’s restitution

payments would be directed to the decedent’s estate.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of November, 2007

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:96-cr-00007-MP Document 42 Filed 11/07/07 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 74002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30132]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 57-2010]


Foreign-Trade Zone 148--Knoxville, TN, Application for Subzone 
Toho, Tenax America, Inc., Extension of Comment Period

    The comment period for the application for subzone status at the 
Toho Tenax America, Inc., facility in Rockwood, Tennessee, submitted by 
the Industrial Development Board of Blount County, Tennessee (75 FR 
61696, 10/6/2010), is being extended to January 20, 2011, to allow 
interested parties additional time in which to comment. Rebuttal 
comments may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period, until 
February 4, 2011. Submissions (original and one electronic copy) shall 
be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at: Foreign-Trade Zones 
Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 2111, 1401 Constitution Ave., 
NW., Washington, DC 20230.
    For further information, contact Diane Finver at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ebaf828a858ec5ad82859d8e99ab9f998a8f8ec58c849d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c68454d4249026a45425a495e6c585e4d4849024b435a">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 482-1367.

    Dated: November 22, 2010.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30132 Filed 11-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Silver Pearl Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  June 28, 2007



/s/ Denise Smith

Name: Denise Smith

Title:  Chief Executive Officer







Dated:  June 28, 2007



/s/ Denise Smith

Name: Denise Smith

Title:  Chief Financial Officer