alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
22.1705 Solicitation provision and contract clause.       (a)                                                         (1) 								                 Insert the clause at 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons, in all solicitations and contracts.                                                            (2) 								                 Use the clause with its Alternate I when the contract will be performed outside the United States (as defined at 22.1702) and the contracting officer has been notified of specific U.S. directives or notices regarding combating trafficking in persons (such as general orders or military listings of "off-limits" local establishments) that apply to contractor employees at the contract place of performance.                                                                             (b) 						             Insert the provision at 52.222-56, Certification Regarding Trafficking in Persons Compliance Plan, in solicitations if                                                         (1) 								                 It is possible that at least  									$550,000 								 of the value of the contract may be performed outside the United States; and                                                            (2) 								                 The acquisition is not entirely for commercially available off-the-shelf items.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 22.17 - Combating Trafficking in Persons
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RHONDA FLEMING,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-545-WS/MJF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and 

WARDEN ERICA STRONG,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

On May 2, 2022, this court ordered Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff’s 

“Motion for Emergency Relief from Abuses by Defendant Warden Strong” and 

“Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Hearing.” Docs. 82, 83. This 

court imposed a deadline of May 17, 2022 to comply. Defendants did not comply 

with the order.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. On or before May 27, 2022, Defendants shall explain and show cause 

why they failed to comply with this court’s May 2, 2022 order.

2. Defendants’ failure to comply with this order may result in an 

imposition of sanctions as described by Local Rule 41.1.

SO ORDERED this 23rd day of May, 2022.

/s/ Michael J. Frank

Michael J. Frank

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 94 Filed 05/23/22 Page 1 of 1
#### § 52.812 Score sheet for frozen red tart pitted cherries.

| Size and kind of container | | | |
| Container mark or identification | | | |
| Label (style of pack, ratio of fruit to sugar, etc., if shown) | | | |
| Net weight (ounces) | | | |
| Size1 | | | |
| Factor | | | |
| | Score points | | |
| Color | 30 | (A) | 27-30 |
| | | (B) | 2 24-26 |
| | | (C) | 2 21-23 |
| | | (SStd.) | 2 0-20 |
| Freedom from pits | 20 | (A) | 18-20 |
| | | (B) | 2 16-17 |
| | | (C) | 2 14-15 |
| | | (SStd.) | 2 0-13 |
| Freedom from defects | 20 | (A) (B) | 18-20 2 16-17 |
| | | (C) | 2 14-15 |
| | | (SStd.) | 2 0-13 |
| Character | 30 | (A) | 27-30 |
| | | (B) | 2 24-26 |
| | | (C) | 2 21-23 |
| | | (SStd.) | 2 0-20 |
| Total score | 100 | | |
| Normal flavor | | | |
| Grade | | | |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 See size limitation for U.S. Grade A and U.S. Grade B. | | | |
| 2 Indicates limiting rule. | | | |
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of O2 Secure Wireless, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), doeshereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:

1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) of the Company complies in all material respectswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ T. Scott Conley                       |
|-------------------------------------------|
| T. Scott Conley,  Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: May 15,  2007                       |

 

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Larry Joe Clowers Jr. v. Kathleen Ann Dawson

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00173

- CV

Trial court case number: 2018

- 84453

Trial court: 189th District Court of Har ri s County

On April 15, 2022, A ppellant, Larry Joe Clowers Jr. , filed a “ F i rst U nopposed Motion for

Extension of Time to Make Arrangements to P ay for the Reporter ’ s Record Until After

Mediation. ” T he m oti on is granted . The deadlin e for Appellant to notify the Court of payment

or of payment arrangements for the reporter ’ s record is June 10, 2022.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___________ /s/ Julie Countiss

__________ Acting individually

Date: A p ril 26, 2022
§ 52.13 Basis of inspection and grade or compliance determination. ( a ) Inspection service shall be performed on the basis of the appropriate United States standards for grades of processed products, Federal, Military, Veterans Administration or other government agency specifications, written contract specifications, or any written specification or instruction which is approved by the Administrator.
( b ) Unless otherwise approved by the Administrator, compliance with such grade standards, specifications, or instructions shall be determined by evaluating the product, or sample, in accordance with the requirements of such standards, specifications or instructions: *Provided,* That when inspection for quality is based on any U.S. grade standard which contains a scoring system, the grade to be assigned to a lot is the grade indicated by the average of the total of the scores of the respective sample units: *Provided further,* That— ( 1 ) Such sample complies with the applicable standards of quality promulgated under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act;
( 2 ) Such sample complies with the product description;
( 3 ) Such sample meets the indicated grade with respect to factors of quality which are not rated by score points; and
( 4 ) With respect to those factors of quality which are rated by score points, each of the following requirements is met: ( i ) None of the sample units falls more than one grade below the indicated grade because of any quality factor to which a limiting rule applies;
( ii ) None of the sample units falls more than 4 score points below the minimum total score for the indicated grade;
( iii ) The number of deviants does not exceed the applicable acceptance number indicated in the sampling plans contained in § 52.38 (“deviants”, as used in this paragraph, means sample units that fall into the next grade below the indicated grade but do not score more than 4 points below the minimum total score for the indicated grade);
( 5 ) If any of the provisions contained in paragraphs (b) (3) and (4) of this section are not met, the grade is determined by considering such provisions in connection with succeedingly lower grades until the grade of the lot, if assignable, is established; and
( 6 ) When it is determined that a portion of a lot bearing a particular identification mark is of lower quality or deficient in other factors, the grade or compliance of the lot shall be no higher than that of the portion bearing the particular identification mark.
[22 FR 3535, May 22, 1957, as amended at 33 FR 9582, July 2, 1968. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977 and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981]
#### § 4284.18 Audit requirements.

Grantees must comply with the audit requirements of 2 CFR part 200 as adopted by USDA in 2 CFR part 400. The audit requirements apply to the years in which grant funds are received and years in which work is accomplished using grant funds.

[79 FR 76017, Dec. 19, 2014]
# 22.609 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**Subpart 22.6 - Contracts for Materials, Supplies, Articles, and Equipment
|                                        |         |                                |
|---------------------------------------------|--------------|-------------------------------------|
|  Name of Entity                        |    | State of Incorporation/Organization |
|                                        |         |
| Walco International, Inc.                   |    | Delaware                            |
|                                        |         |
| Kane Veterinary Supplies, Ltd.              |    | Canada                              |
|                                        |         |
| KVSL Financing, L.P.                        |    | Canada                              |
|                                        |         |
| Walco Texas Animal Health, LLC              |    | Texas                               |
|                                        |         |
| Walco Mexico, S.A. De C.V.                  |    | Mexico                              |
|                                        |         |
| Hawaii Mega-Cor., Inc.                      |    | Hawaii                              |
|                                        |         |
| American Livestock and Pet Supply, Inc.     |    | Delaware                            |
|                                        |         |
| Walco do Brasil Produtos Veterinarios Ltda. |    | Brazil                              |
|                                        |         |
| Rogz, Inc.                                  |         | Missouri                            |
#### § 51.639 Fairly well colored.

*Fairly well colored* means that except for a 1-inch circle in the aggregate of green color, the yellow color predominates over the green color on that part of the fruit which is not discolored.
#### Amaranth LLC et al., Appellants, v National Australia Bank Limited et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 18, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 40 AD3d 279.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellants’ motion to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SkyTerra Communications,
Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Alexander H. Good, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge: (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/
  Alexander H. GoodAlexander H.
  GoodChief
  Executive Officer and President May 5, 2008
24.103 Procedures.       (a) 						            The contracting officer shall review requirements to determine whether the contract will involve the design, development, or operation of a system of records on individuals to accomplish an agency function.                                          (b) 						            If one or more of those tasks will be required, the contracting officer shall-                                                         (1) 								                Ensure that the contract work statement specifically identifies the system of records on individuals and the design, development, or operation work to be performed; and                                                            (2) 								                Make available, in accordance with agency procedures, agency rules and regulation implementing the Act.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 24.1 - Protection of Individual Privacy
#### § 51.1436 Size classifications for pieces.

The size of pecan pieces in a lot may be specified in accordance with one of the size classifications shown in table 1 to this section. Sizes are measured using a round-hole screen.

(a) *Tolerances for size of pieces.* In order to allow for variations incident to proper sizing, tolerances are provided for pieces in a lot which fail to meet the requirements of any size specified. The tolerances, by weight, are as follows:

(1) *U.S. Extra Fancy pieces and U.S. Fancy pieces.* Not more than 15 percent of the lot may fall outside of the size range in Table 1 to this section. Further, not more than 1 percent of the pieces, excluding Topping Pieces and Granules, may pass through an eight sixty-fourths of an inch round hole screen.

(2) *U.S. Choice pieces.* Not more than 20 percent of the lot may fall outside of the size range in Table 1 to this section. Further, not more than 2 percent of the pieces, excluding Topping Pieces and Granules, may pass through an eight sixty-fourths of an inch round hole screen.

(3) *U.S. Standard pieces.* Not more than 25 percent of the lot may fall outside of the size range in table 1 to this section. Further, not more than 2 percent of the pieces, excluding Topping Pieces and Granules, may pass through an eight sixty-fourths of an inch round hole screen.

(b) [Reserved]

Table 1 to [§ 51.1436](/on/2024-09-16/title-7/section-51.1436)

| Size classification | Maximum diameter (will pass through round opening of the following diameter) | Minimum diameter (will not pass through round opening of the following diameter) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Extra-Large Pieces | No limitation | 32/64 inch. |
| Large Pieces | 32/64 inch | 24/64 inch. |
| Halves and Pieces | No limitation | 20/64 inch. |
| Medium Pieces | 24/64 inch | 16/64 inch. |
| Small Pieces | 16/64 inch | 12/64 inch. |
| Topping Pieces | 12/64 inch | 8/64 inch. |
| Granules | 8/64 inch | 4/64 inch. |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| In lieu of the size classifications in this table, the size of pieces in a lot may be specified in terms of minimum diameter, or as a range described in terms of minimum and maximum diameters expressed in sixty-fourths of an inch. | | |
#### § 56.39 Quality assurance inspector required.

The official identification with the grademark of any product as provided in §§ 56.35 to 56.41, inclusive, shall be done only under the supervision of a grader or quality assurance inspector. The grader or quality assurance inspector shall have supervision over the use and handling of all material bearing any official identification.

[42 FR 2971, Jan. 14, 1977. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 39570, Aug. 4, 1981. Redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981; 69 FR 76376, Dec. 21, 2004]
Exhibit 32.1



              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 (Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of The Saint James
Company.  (the "Company") for the six-month  interim period ended June 30, 2007,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Bruce Anthony Cosgrove, President & Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge

     (1) The report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date:  February 12, 2008       By:    /s/ Bruce Anthony Cosgrove
                                      --------------------------
                                          Bruce Anthony Cosgrove

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 1 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 2 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 3 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 4 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 5 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 6 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 7 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 8 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 9 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 10 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 11 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 12 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 13 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 14 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 15 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 16 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 17 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 18 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 19 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 20 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 21 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 22 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 23 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 24 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 25 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 26 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 27 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 28 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 29 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 30 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 31 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 32 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 33 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 34 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 35 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 36 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 37 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 38 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 39 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 40 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 41 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 42 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 43 of 44
Case 3:20-cv-05968-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 04/26/21 Page 44 of 44
2.000 Scope of part.       (a)                    						            This part-                                                         (1)                          								                Defines words and terms that are frequently used in the FAR;                                                            (2)                          								                Provides cross-references to other definitions in the FAR of the same word or term; and                                                            (3)                          								                Provides for the incorporation of these definitions in solicitations and contracts by reference.                                                                             (b)                    						            Other parts, subparts, and sections of this regulation (48 CFR chapter 1) may define other words or terms and those definitions only apply to the part, subpart, or section where the word or term is defined.    **Parent topic:** Part 2 - Definitions of Words and Terms
34.104 Contract clause.       Insert the clause at 52.234-1, Industrial Resources Developed under TitleIII, Defense Production Act, in all contracts for major systems and items of supply.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 34.1 - Testing, Qualification and Use of Industrial Resources Developed Under TitleIII, Defense Production Act
35.017-7           Limitation on the creation of new FFRDC’s.       Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 4126, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Army, the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of the Air Force, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration may not obligate or expend amounts appropriated to the Department of Defense for purposes of operating an FFRDC that was not in existence before June 2, 1986, until—                                       (a)                   The head of the agency submits to Congress a report with respect to such center that describes the purpose, mission, and general scope of effort of the center; and                                          (b)                   A period of 60 days, beginning on the date such report is received by Congress, has elapsed.    **Parent topic:** 35.017 Federally Funded Research and Development Centers.
#### § 3565.257 Procurement actions.

All construction procurement actions, whether by sealed bid or by negotiation, must be conducted in a manner that provides maximum open and free competition.
§ 51.1402 U.S. Choice. “U.S. Choice” consists of pecans in the shell which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Free from loose extraneous or foreign material.
( b ) Shells are: ( 1 ) Fairly uniform in color; and
( 2 ) Free from damage by any cause.
( c ) Kernels are: ( 1 ) Not poorly developed;
( 2 ) Well cured;
( 3 ) Moisture content shall be not more than 6 percent, unless otherwise specified;
( 4 ) Fairly uniform in color;
( 5 ) Not darker than “amber,” unless specified to a lighter color classification; and
( 6 ) Free from damage by any cause.
( d ) For tolerances see § 51.1406.
#### § 56.31 Report of grading work.

Reports of grading work performed within official plants shall be forwarded to the Administrator by the grader in a manner as may be specified by the Administrator.

[71 FR 42010, July 24, 2006]