alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of The Furia Organization,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  ****Dated: May 19, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Michael D.
      AlexanderMichael D. AlexanderPresident and Chief Financial
      Officer
§ 51.2107 U.S. No. 1. “U.S. No. 1” consists of shelled almonds of similar varietal characteristics which are whole, clean and well dried, and which are free from decay, rancidity, insect injury, foreign material, doubles, split or broken kernels, particles and dust, and free from damage caused by chipped and scratched kernels, mold, gum, shriveling, brown spot or other means. (See §§ 51.2113 and 51.2114.) In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, the following tolerances, by weight, shall be permitted: ( a ) *For dissimilar varieties.* 5 percent, including not more than one-fifth of this amount, or 1 percent, for bitter almonds mixed with sweet almonds;
( b ) *For doubles.* 15 percent;
( c ) *For kernels damaged by chipping and/or scratching.* 10 percent;
( d ) *For foreign material.* One-twentieth of 1 percent (0.05 percent). No part of this percentage shall be allowed for glass and metal;
( e ) *For particles and dust.* One-tenth of 1 percent (0.10 percent); and,
( f ) *For other defects.* 5 percent including not more than one-fifth of this amount, or 1 percent, for split or broken kernels, and including not more than three-tenths of the former amount, or 11 ⁄ 2 percent, for seriously damaged kernels.
#### § 51.2946 [Reserved]
§ 51.2089 Damage. *Damage* means any defect which materially detracts from the appearance of the individual kernel, or the edible or shipping quality of the almond. Any one of the following defects or combination thereof, the seriousness of which exceeds the maximum allowed for any one defect shall be considered as damage: ( a ) Discoloration of the shell which is medium gray to black and affects more than one-eighth of the surface in the aggregate. Normal variations of a reddish or brownish color shall not be considered discoloration;
( b ) Adhering hulls which cover more than 5 percent of the shell surface in the aggregate;
( c ) Broken shells when a portion of the shell is missing, or the shell is broken or fractured to the extent that moderate pressure will permit the kernel to become dislodged;
( d ) Insect injury when the insect, web or frass is present or there is definite evidence of insect feeding;
( e ) Mold, when visible on the kernel, except when white or gray and easily rubbed off with the fingers;
( f ) Gum, when a film of shiny, resinous appearing substance affects an area aggregating more than the equivalent of a circle one-quarter inch (6.4 mm) in diameter;
( g ) Skin discoloration when more than one-half of the surface of the kernel is affected by very dark or black stains contrasting with the natural color of the skin;
( h ) Shriveling when the kernel is excessively thin for its size, or when materially withered, shrunken, leathery, tough or only partially developed: Provided, that partially developed kernels are not considered damaged if more than three-fourths of the pellicle is filled with meat. An almond containing two kernels shall not be classed as damaged if either kernel has more than three-fourths of the pellicle filled with meat; and,
( i ) Brown spot which affects an aggregate area on the kernel greater than the area of a circle one-eighth inch (3.2 mm) in diameter.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Barbara A. Mansfield, Respondent, v. General Adjustment Bureau et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Herlihy, J.

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which made an award to the claimant. The claimant’s deceased husband was a claims adjuster assigned to the employer’s Brooklyn office which serviced claims for the Borough of Brooklyn. The decedent had been furnished with a company ear for his field work and he paid $5 per month for the privilege of using it for personal reasons. The decedent performed part of his work at the office, part by visiting premises in the Brooklyn area and partly at home. On October 4, 1963 the decedent went to the office at 9:00 a.m. and after office hours he attended a party held at a restaurant in Queens Village in honor of two co-employees who had been transferred from the Brooklyn office. The dinner apparently ended at about 11:00 p.m. at which time he called his wife and told her he was staying on with “ two fellows ”. At 3:55 a.m. on October 5, 1963 while evidently on his way home, his automobile left the highway and struck a pole. He died on October 14, 1963 as a result of this accident. The board found that the. decedent was an outside worker and "as *784such, was entitled to coverage until he returned home and since he was on the direct route home the accident arose out of and in the course of employment. The appellants have not shown any personal activity which was the probable cause of the accident. The travel to and from decedent’s home was ordinarily in the course of his employment and the board properly found that he was on his way home. The board was not on this record required *“*from the mere unexplained lapse of time ” to *“*infer that the accidental death was occasioned by decedent’s deviation from the employment for personal indulgence or gratification in such degree as to require the conclusions that decedent never re-entered the employment and that the supposed personal acts prior to his departure from [the restaurant] * * * caused his accidental death”. *(Matter of Church*v. *Worthington Corp.,*12 A D 2d 571, 572.) The issue involved is factual and we cannot say as a matter of law that the board erred. (See *Matter of Durkee*v. *Atlantic Refining Co.,*27 A D 2d 773; *Matter of Naples*v. *Viandvende Corp.,*27 A D 2d 772.) Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in a memorandum decision by Herlihy, J.
§ 3201.49 Industrial cleaners. ( a ) *Definition.* Products used to remove contaminants, such as adhesives, inks, paint, dirt, soil, and grease, from parts, products, tools, machinery, equipment, vessels, floors, walls, and other production-related work areas. The cleaning products within this item are usually solvents, but may take other forms. They may be used in either straight solution or diluted with water in pressure washers, or in hand wiping applications in industrial or manufacturing settings, such as inside vessels. Task-specific cleaners used in industrial settings, such as parts wash solutions, are not included in this definition.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 41 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than October 27, 2010, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased industrial cleaners. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased industrial cleaners.
[74 FR 55093, Oct. 27, 2009]
22.403-4 Executive Orders 13658 and 14026.

Executive Order (E.O.) 13658 established minimum wages for certain workers at $10.10 per hour.

The E.O. 13658 rate has increased each year since 2015, rising to $11.25 on January 1, 2022. As of

January 30, 2022, E.O. 13658 is superseded by E.O. 14026 to the extent that it is inconsistent with

E.O. 14026; the minimum wage rate for certain workers is increased to $15.00 per hour. The wage

rate is subject to annual increases by an amount determined by the Secretary of Labor. See subpart 

22.19. The clause at 52.222-55, Minimum Wages for Contractor Workers under Executive Order

14026, requires the E.O. 14026 minimum wage rate to be paid if it is higher than other minimum

wage rates, such as the subpart 22.4 statutory wage determination amount.

Parent topic: 22.403 Statutory, Executive Order, and regulatory requirements.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 252 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on Resources 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain 

land in Washoe County, Nevada, to the Board of Regents 

of the University and Community College System of Nevada. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dandini Research Park 

5 Conveyance Act’’. 
2 

S 252 RFH 

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

2 In this Act: 

3 (1) BOARD OF REGENTS.—The term ‘‘Board of 

4 Regents’’ means the Board of Regents of the Uni5 versity and Community College System of Nevada. 

6 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

7 the Secretary of the Interior. 

8 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE TO THE UNIVERSITY AND COMMU9 NITY COLLEGE SYSTEM OF NEVADA. 

10 (a) CONVEYANCE.— 

11 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall convey 

12 to the Board of Regents, without consideration, all 

13 right, title, and interest of the United States in and 

14 to the approximately 467 acres of land located in 

15 Washoe County, Nevada, patented to the University 

16 of Nevada under the Act of June 14, 1926 (com17 monly known as the ‘‘Recreation and Public Pur18 poses Act’’) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.), and described 

19 in paragraph (2). 

20 (2) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred 

21 to in paragraph (1) is— 

22 (A) the parcel of land consisting of ap23 proximately 309.11 acres and more particularly 

24 described as T. 20 N., R. 19 E., Sec. 25, lots 

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 11, SE1⁄4NW1⁄4, NE1⁄4SW1 25 ⁄4, 

26 Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada; and 
3 

S 252 RFH 

1 (B) the parcel of land consisting of ap2 proximately 158.22 acres and more particularly 

3 described as T. 20 N., R. 19 E., Sec. 25, lots 

6 and 7, SW1⁄4NE1⁄4, NW1⁄4SE1 4 ⁄4, Mount Dia5 blo Meridian, Nevada. 

6 (b) COSTS.—The Board of Regents shall pay to the 

7 United States an amount equal to the costs of the Sec8 retary associated with the conveyance under subsection 

9 (a)(1). 

10 (c) CONDITIONS.—If the Board of Regents sells any 

11 portion of the land conveyed to the Board of Regents 

12 under subsection (a)(1)— 

13 (1) the amount of consideration for the sale 

14 shall reflect fair market value, as determined by an 

15 appraisal; and 

16 (2) the Board of Regents shall pay to the Sec17 retary an amount equal to the net proceeds of the 

18 sale, for use by the Director of the Bureau of Land 

19 Management in the State of Nevada, without further 

20 appropriation. 

Passed the Senate July 26, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
Subpart 44.4 - Subcontracts for Commercial Products and Commercial Services    **Parent topic:** Part 44 - Subcontracting Policies and Procedures44.400 Scope of subpart.       This subpart prescribes the policies limiting the contract clauses a contractor may be required to apply to any subcontractors that are furnishing commercial products, including commercial components, or commercial services in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 3307.44.401 Applicability.       This subpart applies to all contracts and subcontracts. For the purpose of this subpart, the term "subcontract" has the same meaning as defined in part  12.44.402 Policy requirements.       (a) Contractors and subcontractors at all tiers shall, to the maximum extent practicable:                                                         (1) Be required to incorporate commercial products, commercial services, or nondevelopmental items as components of items delivered to the Government; and                                                            (2) Not be required to apply to any of its divisions, subsidiaries, affiliates, subcontractors or suppliers that are furnishing commercial products or commercial services any clause, except those-                                                                           (i) Required to implement provisions of law or Executive orders applicable to subcontractors furnishing commercial products or commercial services; or                                                                              (ii) Determined to be consistent with customary commercial practice for the item being acquired.                                                                                                                            (b) The clause at 52.244-6, Subcontracts for Commercial Products and Commercial Services, implements the policy in paragraph (a) of this section. Notwithstanding any other clause in the prime contract, only those clauses identified in the clause at 52.244-6 are required to be in subcontracts for commercial products or commercial services.                                          (c) Agencies may supplement the clause at 52.244-6 only as necessary to reflect agency unique statutes applicable to the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services.44.403 Contract clause.       The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.244-6, Subcontracts for Commercial Products and Commercial Services, in solicitations and contracts other than those for commercial products or commercial services.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

 Case No. 4:20-cv-00405-MW-MAF 

 

CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, 

 

Plaintiff, 

v 

PERKINS ELECTRIC ENTERPRISES INC, 

Defendant.

JUDGMENT 

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant are dismissed with prejudice. 

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS 

 CLERK OF COURT 

April 5, 2021 s/Ronnell Barker_________ 

DATE Deputy Clerk: Ronnell Barker 

Case 4:20-cv-00405-MW-MAF Document 19 Filed 04/05/21 Page 1 of 1
32.502-4 Contract clauses.

(a)

(1) Insert the clause at 52.232-16, Progress Payments, in-

(i) Solicitations that may result in contracts providing for progress payments based on costs; and

(ii) Fixed-price contracts under which the Government will provide progress payments based on

costs.

(2) If advance agency approval has been given in accordance with 32.501-1, the contracting officer

may substitute a different customary rate for other than small business concerns for the progress

payment and liquidation rate indicated.

(3) If an unusual progress payment rate is approved for the prime contractor (see 32.501-2),

substitute the approved rate for the customary rate in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(6), and (b) of the clause.

(4) If the liquidation rate is changed from the customary progress payment rate (see 32.503-8 and

32.503-9), substitute the new rate for the rate in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(6), and (b) of the clause.

(5) If an unusual progress payment rate is approved for a subcontract (see 32.504(c) and 32.501-2),

modify paragraph (j)(6) of the clause to specify the new rate, the name of the subcontractor, and

that the new rate shall be used for that subcontractor in lieu of the customary rate.

(b) If the contractor is a small business concern, use the clause with its AlternateI.

(c) If the contract is a letter contract, use the clause with its AlternateII.

(d) If the contractor is not a small business concern, and progress payments are authorized under an

indefinite-delivery contract, basic ordering agreement, or their equivalent, use the clause with its

AlternateIII.

(e) If the nature of the contract necessitates separate progress payment rates for portions of work

that are clearly severable and accounting segregation would be maintained (e.g., annual production

requirements), describe the application of separate progress payment rates in a supplementary

special provision within the contract. The contractor must submit separate progress payment

requests and subsequent invoices for the severable portions of work in order to maintain accounting

integrity.

Parent topic: 32.502 Preaward matters.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

GREGORY HARRIS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-343-AW-MAF

FLORIDA DEP’T OF CORRECTIONS, 

et al., 

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Gregory Harris sued the Department of Corrections and several of its 

employees. ECF No. 1. The magistrate judge, through an August 10, 2020 Report 

and Recommendation, recommends dismissal. ECF No. 13. I have reviewed the 

Report and Recommendation, and I have considered de novo Harris’s objections 

(ECF No. 14.)

As the magistrate judge notes, Harris is a three-strikes inmate who seeks to 

proceed in forma pauperis. Because he has not paid the full filing fee, he can proceed 

only if he “is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(g). So the question is whether he has shown that he has. I agree with the 

magistrate judge and conclude he has not. 

There are two basic claims embedded in Harris’s complaint. First, he alleges 

that he contracted a blood virus that led to severe itching, scratching, and bleeding. 

Case 4:20-cv-00343-AW-MAF Document 15 Filed 09/14/20 Page 1 of 2
2

He alleges that defendants violated the Eighth Amendment by not affording proper 

medical treatment for this condition. Second, he alleges that certain of the defendants 

violated the Eighth Amendment by physically assaulting him. As to the latter claim, 

he has alleged only past conduct—no threat of future harm. So that provides no basis 

to proceed. As to the former—inadequate treatment for the blood infection—I agree 

that he has not provided nonconclusory allegations that would show he faces 

“imminent danger of serious physical injury.” Therefore, I conclude dismissal is 

appropriate.

The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 13) is approved. The clerk will

enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed without prejudice based on 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(g).” The clerk will then close the file.

SO ORDERED on September 14, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00343-AW-MAF Document 15 Filed 09/14/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 4284.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to set forth definitions and requirements which are common to all grant programs set forth in this part administered by Cooperative Services within the Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBS). Programs administered by the Business Programs within RBS are not affected by this subpart.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LAVAROS DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SGT. DANIELS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:20cv5935-HTC

DECLARATION OF JAMES V. COOK

I, James V. Cook, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, state as follows:

1. I am an attorney of record in this case for Plaintiff Lavaros Davis and I 

submit this declaration in support of Plaintiff’s motion for an order to show cause 

why the Florida Department of Corrections transportation officers who attended the 

confidential settlement conference in this case should not be held in contempt. 

2. I am over the age of 18, and I have personal knowledge of the facts set 

forth in this declaration.

3. On May 23, 2023, I participated in a settlement conference together 

with my client, Lavaros Davis, Defendants’ attorney Ravi Sharma, Hon. Charles 

Khan, Magistrate Judge, and three transport officers from Florida State Prison.

4. Prior to the beginning of the negotiations, attorney Sharma moved to 

another room so that only myself, my client Lavaros Davis, Hon. Charles Khan, and 

the three Florida State Prison transport officers remained in the courtroom. No other 

court staff or any other person was in the courtroom during the settlement 

negotiations.

Case 3:20-cv-05935-HTC Document 147-1 Filed 05/31/23 Page 1 of 2
2

5. Prior to the beginning of the settlement conversations, Judge Khan 

advised all the persons in the room, including the FSP transport officers, that the 

proceedings were entirely confidential and that nothing that took place in the course 

of the negotiations could be shared with any other person.

6. On May 30, 2023, I received a letter from my client dated May 24,

2023, in which he stated that that on May 23, 2023—after his return to FSP from the 

settlement conference at the courthouse—a correctional officer named Sgt. Gaskin, 

who worked in the FSP medical department, asked the transportation officers what 

had happened in Court during mediation. According to Mr. Davis, the 

transportation officers told Sgt. Gaskin and all the other officers present “everything 

[t]hat was said and what happen[ed] in the courtroom” during the confidential 

settlement conference. My client wrote that he was then threatened by Sgt. Gaskin 

and another officer—Ofcr. Manning. 

7. According to the letter, Ofcr. Manning escorted my client back to his 

cell and then physically attacked my client while threatening him and informing him 

that he knew my client was “not gone get much anyways” from this lawsuit from 

what he heard. The letter then states that Ofcr. Manning hit my client again and told 

him to “keep his name out of it.” 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on May 31, 2023.

/s/James Cook_______________

By: James V. Cook, Esq.

Case 3:20-cv-05935-HTC Document 147-1 Filed 05/31/23 Page 2 of 2
19.1402 Applicability.

The procedures in this subpart apply to all Federal agencies that employ one or more contracting

officers.

Parent topic: Subpart 19.14 - Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement

Program
#### § 58.62 Report of violations.

Each inspector, grader, and supervisor of packaging shall report, in the manner prescribed by the Administrator, all violations and noncompliances under the Act and this part of which such inspector, grader, or supervisor of packaging has knowledge.
#### §§ 457.114-457.115 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JASON TUCKER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-26-AW-GRJ

WILLIAM P. BARR,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

I have considered the magistrate judge’s March 30, 2020, Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 8. No objections have been filed. I approve the report 

and recommendation and adopt it as the court’s order. The clerk will enter a 

judgment that says, “This case is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(2)(B)(ii).” The clerk will then close the file. 

SO ORDERED on May 7, 2020.

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00026-AW-GRJ Document 9 Filed 05/07/20 Page 1 of 1