alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Myron Marshall, Appellant, v State Board For Professional Medical Conduct, Respondent.

(Appeal No.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Appellant is a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State of New York and specializing in psychiatry. By notice dated March 20, 1978, appellant was served with a notice of hearing and a statement of charges charging him with misconduct. He thereupon initiated these two proceedings, consolidated for purposes of this appeal. The first proceeding is under article 78 against the State Board seeking prehearing disclosure pursuant to CPLR article 31. We have recently held in a similar appeal that a party is not entitled to such disclosure (see *Matter of Whalen v John P.,*72 AD2d 961). The second proceeding is against the Commissioner of Health, various records access officers and the Attorney-General. It seeks disclosure pursuant to article 6 of the Public Officers Law, the Freedom of Information Law. The items sought are: (1) statements of complaining witnesses, (2) names and addresses of witnesses, lay and expert, (3) a copy of the report of the screening committee that gave rise to the charges, and (4) access to any other information which would not interfere with the proceedings or investigation. The items are not subject to

*799disclosure. Items Nos. 1 and 2 are exempt by State statute (Public Officers Law, § 87, subd 2, par [a]; see Public Health Law, § 230, subd 11, par [a]); Item No. 3 is exempt by another State statute (see Public Health Law, § 230, subd 9; see, also, *Matter of McAulay v Board of Educ.,*61 AD2d 1048, affd 48 NY2d 659), and Item No. 4 clearly contemplates confidential patient records that are exempt by statute (Public Officers Law, § 87, subd 2, par [a]; Public Health Law, § 230, subd 10, par *[l])*and because they constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy (Public Officers Law, § 87, subd 2, par [b]; § 89, subd 2, par [b], cls i, ii; Public Health Law, § 230, subd 10, par *[l]).*We find no violation of appellant’s due process rights. He has been fully apprised of the particulars of the charges against him, the names of the parties involved and the claimed acts of misconduct (see *Matter of Simpson v Wolansky,*38 NY2d 391, 395; *Cirasuolo v Hasenauer,*64 AD2d 860, 861). The charges of misconduct concerned only his treatment of patients, and his contention that he cannot adequately defend himself without pretrial disclosure is without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court—art 78.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Callahan and Moule, JJ.
Case 1:20-cv-00144-AW-GRJ   Document 1-4   Filed 06/22/20   Page 1 of 7

Case 1:20-cv-00144-AW-GRJ   Document 1-4   Filed 06/22/20   Page 2 of 7

Case 1:20-cv-00144-AW-GRJ   Document 1-4   Filed 06/22/20   Page 3 of 7

Case 1:20-cv-00144-AW-GRJ   Document 1-4   Filed 06/22/20   Page 4 of 7

Case 1:20-cv-00144-AW-GRJ   Document 1-4   Filed 06/22/20   Page 5 of 7

Case 1:20-cv-00144-AW-GRJ   Document 1-4   Filed 06/22/20   Page 6 of 7

Case 1:20-cv-00144-AW-GRJ   Document 1-4   Filed 06/22/20   Page 7 of 7
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementNos. 333-140321 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 23, 2007 (March 18, 2008as to the last paragraph of  Note 1), relatingto the consolidated financial statements of Alliance Bancorp, Inc. ofPennsylvania and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006 (whichreport expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphrelating to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and OtherPostretirement Plans”), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AllianceBancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

 

 

 

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

 

Philadelphia,Pennsylvania

March 19,2008

 

 

 

 

----
47.306 Transportation factors in the

evaluation of offers.

When evaluating offers, contracting officers shall consider transportation and transportation-related

costs as well as the offerors’ shipping and receiving facilities.

47.306-1 Transportation cost determinations.

47.306-2 Lowest overall transportation costs.

47.306-3 Adequacy of loading and unloading facilities.

Parent topic: Subpart 47.3 - Transportation in Supply Contracts
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Quintana Gold Resources Corp. (the “company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Delbert G. Blewett, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the company.








/s/  Delbert G. Blewett





Delbert G. Blewett


President and Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer





March 29, 2011











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
48.104-1 Determining sharing period.       (a) 						            Contracting officers must determine discrete sharing periods for each VECP. If more than one VECP is incorporated into a contract, the sharing period for each VECP need not be identical.                                          (b) 						            The sharing period begins with acceptance of the first unit incorporating the VECP. Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this subsection, the end of the sharing period is a specific calendar date that is the later of-                                                         (1) 								                36 to 60 consecutive months (set at the discretion of the contracting officer for each VECP) after the first unit affected by the VECP is accepted; or                                                            (2) 								                The last scheduled delivery date of an item affected by the VECP under the instant contract delivery schedule in effect at the time the VECP is accepted.                                                                             (c) 						            For engineering-development contracts and contracts containing low-rate-initial-production or early production units, the end of the sharing period is based not on a calendar date, but on acceptance of a specified quantity of future contract units. This quantity is the number of units affected by the VECP that are scheduled to be delivered over a period of between 36 and 60 consecutive months (set at the discretion of the contracting officer for each VECP) that spans the highest planned production, based on planning and programming or production documentation at the time the VECP is accepted. The specified quantity begins with the first future contract unit affected by the VECP and continues over consecutive deliveries until the sharing period ends at acceptance of the last of the specified quantity of units.                                          (d) 						            For contracts (other than those in paragraph (c) of this subsection) for items requiring a prolonged production schedule (*e.g.,* ship construction, major system acquisition), the end of the sharing period is determined according to paragraph (b) of this subsection. Agencies may prescribe sharing of future contract savings on all future contract units to be delivered under contracts awarded within the sharing period for essentially the same item, even if the scheduled delivery date is outside the sharing period.    **Parent topic:** 48.104 Sharing arrangements.
36.702 Forms for use in contracting for

architect-engineer services.

(a) Contracting officers must use Standard Form 252, Architect-Engineer Contract, to award fixedprice contracts for architect-engineer services when the services will be performed in the United

States or its outlying areas.

(b) The SF 330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications, shall be used to evaluate firms before awarding a

contract for architect-engineer services:

(1) Use the SF 330, Part I-Contract-Specific Qualifications, to obtain information from an architectengineer firm about its qualifications for a specific contract when the contract amount is expected to

exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Part I may be used when the contract amount is

expected to be at or below the simplified acquisition threshold, if the contracting officer determines

that its use is appropriate.

(2) Use the SF 330, Part II-General Qualifications, to obtain information from an architect-engineer

firm about its general professional qualifications.

Parent topic: Subpart 36.7 - Standard and Optional Forms for Contracting for Construction,

Architect-Engineer Services, and Dismantling, Demolition, or Removal of Improvements
23.406 Solicitation provisions and contract

clauses.

(a) Insert the provision at 52.223-1, Biobased Product Certification, in solicitations that-

(1) Require the delivery or specify the use of USDA-designated items; or

(2) Include the clause at 52.223-2.

(b) Insert the clause at 52.223-2, Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and

Construction Contracts, in service or construction solicitations and contracts, unless the contract

will not involve the use of USDA-designated items at http://www.biopreferred.gov or 7 CFR part

3201.

(c) Except for the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf items, insert the provision at

52.223-4, Recovered Material Certification, in solicitations that-

(1) Require the delivery or specify the use of EPA-designated items; or

(2) Include the clause at 52.223-17, Affirmative Procurement of EPA-designated Items in Service and

Construction Contracts.

(d) Except for the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf items, insert the clause at

52.223-9, Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material Content for EPA-designated Items, in

solicitations and contracts exceeding $150,000 that are for, or specify the use of, EPA-designated

items containing recovered materials. If technical personnel advise that estimates can be verified,

use the clause with its Alternate I.

(e) Insert the clause at 52.223-17, Affirmative Procurement of EPA-designated Items in Service and

Construction Contracts, in service or construction solicitations and contracts unless the contract will

not involve the use of EPA-designated items.

Parent topic: Subpart 23.4 - Use of Recovered Materials and Biobased Products
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  TELS
CORPORATION  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                     7,656
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            372,878
<ALLOWANCES>                                              31,600
<INVENTORY>                                              131,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         553,887
<PP&E>                                                 1,972,203
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (1,558,767)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         1,192,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  1,576,886
<BONDS>                                                  387,455
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                  77,835
<OTHER-SE>                                              (694,175)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           1,192,001
<SALES>                                                1,324,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       1,327,688
<CGS>                                                    286,032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          1,327,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        65,975
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (65,634)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                (100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (65,734)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           (15,899)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (81,633)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (0.02)


</TABLE>
#### HOERLEIN, Respondent, v. FELLMAN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Action by Charles L. Hoerlein against Anna Fellman.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
§ 58.151 Packaging and repackaging. ( a ) Packaging dairy products or cutting and repackaging all styles of dairy products shall be conducted under rigid sanitary conditions. The atmosphere of the packaging rooms, the equipment and packaging materials shall be practically free from mold and bacterial contamination. Methods for checking the level of contamination shall be as prescribed by the latest edition of Standard Methods or by other satisfactory methods approved by the Administrator.
( b ) When officially graded bulk dairy products are to be repackaged into consumer type packages with official grade labels or other official identification, a supervisor of packaging shall be required, see subpart A of this part. (title 7, §§ 58.2 and 58.53 of the Code of Federal Regulations). If the packaging or repackaging is done in a plant other than the one in which the dairy product is manufactured, the plant, equipment, facilities and personnel shall meet the same requirements as outlined in this subpart.
Case 5:96-cr-00035-LC Document 31 Filed 06/17/97 Page 1 of 7Case 5:96-cr-00035-LC Document 31 Filed 06/17/97 Page 2 of 7Case 5:96-cr-00035-LC Document 31 Filed 06/17/97 Page 3 of 7Case 5:96-cr-00035-LC Document 31 Filed 06/17/97 Page 4 of 7Case 5:96-cr-00035-LC Document 31 Filed 06/17/97 Page 5 of 7Case 5:96-cr-00035-LC Document 31 Filed 06/17/97 Page 6 of 7Case 5:96-cr-00035-LC Document 31 Filed 06/17/97 Page 7 of 7
#### § 51.634 Firm.

*Firm* means that the fruit is not soft, or noticeably wilted or flabby, and the skin is not spongy or puffy.
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 1 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 2 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 3 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 4 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 5 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 6 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 7 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 8 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 9 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 10 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 11 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 12 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 13 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 14 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 15 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 16 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 17 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 18 of 20
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 19 of 20
Telephone: (360) 437-4005 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (USA) an entity, 

Pensacola Division 21 East Garden Street, 

Suite 400, 

Pensacola, FL 32502, 

(850) 444-4000 

-and also mailed toU.S. Department of Justice, 

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, 

NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 

KENT E HOVIND, 

488 Pearl Lane, 

Repton, Alabama 36475, 

Telephone (251) 362-4635 

PAUL JOHN HANSEN, 

as Trustee of CSE, 

P.O. Box 314, 

Repton, Alabama 36475, 

Telephone (251) 362-8231 

pauljjhansenlaw@gmail.com 

(( Remaining silent may be a personal, intentional, accumulative, damage, he who confesses receives biblical grace. 

A wise man once said - "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." )) 

Plaintiffs' Objection to REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ofJudge Michael J. Frank, filed 4/21/2021 20 

Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 30 Filed 05/24/21 Page 20 of 20
#### § 52.1001 Product description.

Dates are the properly cured fresh fruit of the date tree (Phoenix dactylifera) which may or may not be softened by hydration. For the purposes of the standards in this subpart, dates, when referred to as “dry dates for processing,” means that the dates are dry and have not been softened by hydration.
44.203 Consent limitations.       (a) 						            The contracting officer’s consent to a subcontract or approval of the contractor’s purchasing system does not constitute a determination of the acceptability of the subcontract terms or price, or of the allowability of costs, unless the consent or approval specifies otherwise.                                          (b) 						            Contracting officers shall not consent to-                                                         (1) 								                Cost-reimbursement subcontracts if the fee exceeds the fee limitations of 15.404-4(c)(4)(i);                                                            (2) 								                Subcontracts providing for payment on a cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost basis;                                                            (3) 								                Subcontracts obligating the contracting officer to deal directly with the subcontractor;                                                            (4) 								                Subcontracts that make the results of arbitration, judicial determination, or voluntary settlement between the prime contractor and subcontractor binding on the Government; or                                                            (5) 								                Repetitive or unduly protracted use of cost-reimbursement, time-and-materials, or labor-hour subcontracts (contracting officers should follow the principles of 16.103(c)).                                                                             (c) 						            Contracting officers should not refuse consent to a subcontract merely because it contains a clause giving the subcontractor the right of indirect appeal to an agency board of contract appeals if the subcontractor is affected by a dispute between the Government and the prime contractor. Indirect appeal means assertion by the subcontractor of the prime contractor’s right to appeal or the prosecution of an appeal by the prime contractor on the subcontractor’s behalf. The clause may also provide that the prime contractor and subcontractor shall be equally bound by the contracting officer’s or board’s decision. The clause may not attempt to obligate the contracting officer or the appeals board to decide questions that do not arise between the Government and the prime contractor or that are not cognizable under the clause at 52.233-1, Disputes.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 44.2 - Consent to Subcontracts
§ 51.2710 U.S. No. 1 Runner. “U.S. No. 1 Runner” consists of shelled Runner type peanut kernels of similar varietal characteristics which are whole and free from foreign material, damage and minor defects, and which will not pass through a screen having 16 ⁄ 64 × 3 ⁄ 4 inch openings. ( a ) In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, the following tolerances, by weight, shall be permitted: ( 1 ) 1 percent for other varieties of peanuts;
( 2 ) 3 percent for sound peanuts which are split or broken;
( 3 ) 1.5 percent for damaged or unshelled peanuts;
( 4 ) 0.5 percent for minor defects: *Provided,* That in addition, any unused part of the tolerance for damaged or unshelled peanuts shall be allowed for minor defects;
( 5 ) 0.1 percent for foreign material; and,
( 6 ) 3 percent for sound whole peanuts which will pass through the prescribed screen.
[21 FR 4850, June 30, 1956, as amended at 21 FR 5669, July 28, 1956. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981]
#### § 53.14 Financial interest of official grader.

No official grader shall grade or determine compliance of any livestock in which he or any of his relatives by blood or marriage is directly or indirectly financially interested.
§ 5001.524 Termination of loan note guarantee. Each loan note guarantee issued under this part or under one of the guaranteed loan programs identified in § 5001.1 of this part will terminate automatically when one of the events described in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section occur. The lender will maintain its guaranteed loan files for at least three years after termination of the loan note guarantee. ( a ) The guaranteed loan is paid in full;
( b ) Full payment by the Agency of any loss claim or compromised settlement except for future recovery provisions; or
( c ) Written request from the lender to the Agency to terminate the guarantee, which will be effective the date the Agency receives the request provided that the lender holds all the guaranteed portion of the loan.
[85 FR 42518, July 14, 2020, as amended at 85 FR 62199, Oct. 2, 2020]
35.000 Scope of part.       (a) 						            This part prescribes policies and procedures of special application to research and development (R&D) contracting.                                          (b) 						            R&D integral to acquisition of major systems is covered in part  34. Independent research and development (IR&D) is covered at 31.205-18.    **Parent topic:** Part 35 - Research and Development Contracting