alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013272EN.01000301.xml

| 12.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 272/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 272/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 972/2013

of 9 October 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Μεσσαρά (Messara) (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Greece’s application to register the name ‘Μεσσαρά’ (Messara) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Greece’s application to register the name ‘Μεσσαρά’ (Messara) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Μεσσαρά’ (Messara) should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Μεσσαρά’ (Messara) should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 October 2013.

For the Commission

Joaquín ALMUNIA

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 396, 21.12.2012, p. 24.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.5.   Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oils, etc.)

GREECE

Μεσσαρά (Messara) (PDO)

---
33.203 Applicability.

(a) Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, this part applies to any express or implied

contract covered by the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

(b) This subpart does not apply to any contract with-

(1) A foreign government or agency of that government; or

(2) An international organization or a subsidiary body of that organization, if the agency head

determines that the application of the Disputes statute to the contract would not be in the public

interest.

(c) This part applies to all disputes with respect to contracting officer decisions on matters "arising

under" or "relating to" a contract. Agency Boards of Contract Appeals (BCAs) authorized under the

Disputes statute continue to have all of the authority they possessed before the Disputes statute with

respect to disputes arising under a contract, as well as authority to decide disputes relating to a

contract. The clause at 52.233-1, Disputes, Disputes, recognizes the "all disputes" authority

established by the Disputes statute and states certain requirements and limitations of the Disputes

statute for the guidance of contractors and contracting agencies. The clause is not intended to affect

the rights and obligations of the parties as provided by the Disputes statute or to constrain the

authority of the statutory agency BCAs in the handling and deciding of contractor appeals under the

Disputes statute.

Parent topic: Subpart 33.2 - Disputes and Appeals
52.214-22 Evaluation of Bids for Multiple Awards.       As prescribed in 14.201-6(q), insert the following provision:          Evaluation of Bids for Multiple Awards (Mar 1990)          In addition to other factors, bids will be evaluated on the basis of advantages and disadvantages to the Government that might result from making more than one award (multiple awards). It is assumed, for the purpose of evaluating bids, that $500 would be the administrative cost to the Government for issuing and administering each contract awarded under this solicitation, and individual awards will be for the items or combinations of items that result in the lowest aggregate cost to the Government, including the assumed administrative costs.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.214 [Reserved]
§ 52.803 Sample unit size. Compliance with requirements for size and the various quality factors is based on the following sample unit sizes for the applicable factor: ( a ) Pits, character, and harmless extraneous material—20 ounces of drained cherries.
( b ) Size, color, and defects (other than harmless extraneous material)—100 cherries.
14.503-2 Step two.

(a) Sealed bidding procedures shall be followed except that invitations for bids shall-

(1) Be issued only to those offerors submitting acceptable technical proposals in step one;

(2) Include the provision prescribed in 14.201-6(t);

(3) Prominently state that the bidder shall comply with the specifications and the bidder’s technical

proposal; and

(4) Not be synopsized through the Governmentwide point of entry (GPE) as an acquisition

opportunity nor publicly posted (see 5.101(a)).

(b) The names of firms that submitted acceptable proposals in step one will be listed through the

GPE for the benefit of prospective subcontractors (see 5.207).

Parent topic: 14.503 Procedures.
47.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.       (a) 						            The contracting officer shall coordinate transportation factors with the transportation office during the planning, solicitation, and award phases of the acquisition process (see 47.105).                                          (b) 						            To the extent feasible, activities shall schedule deliveries to effect savings in transportation costs, and concomitant reductions in energy consumption by carriers (see 47.305-7 and 47.305-8 for specific possibilities).    **47.305-1 Solicitation requirements.****47.305-2 Solicitations f.o.b. origin and f.o.b. destination-lowest overall cost.****47.305-3 F.o.b. origin solicitations.****47.305-4 F.o.b. destination solicitations.****47.305-5 Destination unknown.****47.305-6 Shipments to ports and air terminals.****47.305-7 Quantity analysis, direct delivery, and reduction of crosshauling and backhauling.****47.305-8 Consolidation of small shipments and the use of stopoff privileges.****47.305-9 Commodity description and freight classification.****47.305-10 Packing, marking, and consignment instructions.****47.305-11 Options in shipment and delivery.****47.305-12 Delivery of Government-furnished property.****47.305-13 Transit arrangements.****47.305-14 Mode of transportation.****47.305-15 Loading responsibilities of contractors.****47.305-16 Shipping characteristics.****47.305-17 Returnable cylinders.****Parent topic:** Subpart 47.3 - Transportation in Supply Contracts
Exhibit 10.3


 


Director Compensation Summary


 


We currently pay our
non-management directors an annual retainer of $150,000 per year.  We pay $60,000 of the retainer in cash and
$90,000 of the retainer in restricted stock to non-management directors who
have not satisfied our share ownership guidelines.  We pay $105,000 of the retainer in cash and
$45,000 of the retainer in restricted stock to non-management directors who
have satisfied our share ownership guidelines. Any director may elect to
receive up to 100 percent his annual retainer in restricted stock.  Any director who has satisfied our share
ownership guidelines may also elect to receive up to 50 percent of the
portion of the annual retainer that is not paid in cash in the form of stock
options rather than in the form of restricted stock.  Grants of restricted stock receive cash
dividends.  Restricted stock and stock
options vest on the day immediately prior to the first annual general meeting
of shareholders at which directors are elected following the grant of the stock
or option.  Vested options are
exercisable for up to ten years after grant, but only while the director is
serving on the Board and for 30 days after leaving the Board (two years after
leaving if termination is because of retirement after five years of Board
service, death, or disability, and two years following a change in control).


 


The Chairman of the Board
receives an additional $100,000 annual retainer, the Chairman of the Audit
Committee receives an additional $30,000 annual retainer and the Chairman of
each of the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee,
the Finance Committee and the Risk Oversight Committee receives an additional
$10,000 annual retainer. Members of the Audit Committee, other than the chairman,
receive an additional $10,000 annual retainer and members, other than the
chairmen, of each of the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Governance
Committee, the Finance Committee and the Risk Oversight Committee receive an
additional $5,000 annual retainer. The Company will generally not pay a fee for
attendance at board or committee meetings, though the Chairman of the Board has
the discretion to pay attendance fees of $2,000 for extraordinary or special
meetings.


 


The Board of Directors has recommended
that each director own at least 10,000 common shares within three years after
joining the Board.  Common shares
represented by stock units previously granted to directors (i.e., units for which common shares will be received six
months after termination of the director’s service on the Board of Directors)
will count toward that guideline, although restricted shares awarded upon a
director’s initial election will not.  We
have discontinued both the practice of granting stock units to directors and of
awarding directors an initial, one-time restricted share grant upon their
election to the board.
#### § 51.908 Serious damage.

*Serious damage* means any defect or any combination of defects which seriously detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the grapes and includes berries which are split, crushed, wet, affected by decay or waterberry, or affected by heat or freezing. Grapes which show healed cracks at the blossom and shall not be considered as seriously damaged.

[36 FR 9126, May 20, 1971. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981. Redesignated at 56 FR 15802, Apr. 18, 1991]
#### § 58.435 Color.

Coloring when used, shall be Annatto or any cheese or butter color which meet the requirements of the Food and Drug Administration.
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      ss.1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Datascension Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
      "Report")"Report"), I, David Lieberman, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                David LiebermanDAVID
                LIEBERMAN
              Prin.
                Accounting OfficerDated:
                October 9, 2008
§ 58.938 Physical requirements and microbiological limits for sweetened condensed milk. ( a ) *Flavor.* Shall be sweet, clean, and free from rancid, oxidized, scorched, fermented, stale or other objectionable tastes and odors.
( b ) *Color.* Shall be white to light cream.
( c ) *Texture.* Shall be smooth and uniform, free from lumps or coarse graininess. There shall not be sufficient settling of the lactose to cause a deposit on the bottom of the container.
( d ) *Body.* Shall be sufficiently viscous so that the product upon being poured at room temperature piles up above the surface of that previously poured, but does not retain a definite form.
( e ) *Microbiological limits.* ( 1 ) Coliforms, less than 10 per gram;
( 2 ) yeasts, less than 5 per gram;
( 3 ) molds, less than 5 per gram;
( 4 ) total plate count, less than 1,000 per gram.
( f ) *Keeping quality.* Samples incubated at 90-100 °F shall show no physical evidence of deterioration after seven days.
( g ) *Composition.* Shall meet the minimum requirements of the Food and Drug Administration for sweetened condensed milk (21 CFR 131.120). In addition, the quantity of refined sugar used shall be sufficient to give a sugar-in-water ratio of not less than 61.5 percent.
( h ) *Sediment.* The amount of sediment retained on a lintine disc after a sample composed of 225 grams of product dissolved in 500 ml. of 140 °F water has passed through it, shall not exceed 0.10 mg. as indicated by the USDA Sediment Standard for Milk and Milk Products (7 CFR 58.2726).
[40 FR 47911, Oct. 10, 1975. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 67 FR 48977, July 29, 2002]
25.603 Exceptions.

(a)

(1) When one of the following exceptions applies, the contracting officer may allow the contractor to

incorporate foreign manufactured construction materials without regard to the restrictions of

section 1605 of the Recovery Act or foreign unmanufactured construction material without regard to

the restrictions of the Buy American statute:

(i) Nonavailability. The head of the contracting activity may determine that a particular construction

material is not mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States in sufficient and reasonably

available commercial quantities of a satisfactory quality. The determinations of nonavailability of the

articles listed at 25.104(a) and the procedures at 25.103(b)(1) also apply if any of those articles are

acquired as construction materials.

(ii) Unreasonable cost. The contracting officer concludes that the cost of domestic construction

material is unreasonable in accordance with 25.605.

(iii) Inconsistent with public interest. The head of the agency may determine that application of the

restrictions of section 1605 of the Recovery Act to a particular manufactured construction material,

or the restrictions of the Buy American statute to a particular unmanufactured construction material

would be inconsistent with the public interest.

(2) In addition, the head of the agency may determine that application of the Buy American statute

to a particular unmanufactured construction material would be impracticable.

(b) Determinations. When a determination is made, for any of the reasons stated in this section, that

certain foreign construction materials may be used-

(1) The contracting officer shall list the excepted materials in the contract; and

(2) For determinations with regard to the inapplicability of section 1605 of the Recovery Act, unless

the construction material has already been determined to be domestically nonavailable (see list at

25.104), the head of the agency shall provide a notice to the Federal Register within three business

days after the determination is made, with a copy to the Administrator for Federal Procurement

Policy and to the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board. The notice shall include-

(i) The title "Buy American Exception under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009";

(ii) The dollar value and brief description of the project; and

(iii) A detailed justification as to why the restriction is being waived.

(c) Acquisitions under trade agreements.

(1) For construction contracts with an estimated acquisition value of $6,708,000 or more, also see

subpart 25.4. Offers proposing the use of construction material from a designated country shall

receive equal consideration with offers proposing the use of domestic construction material.

(2) For purposes of applying section 1605 of the Recovery Act to evaluation of manufactured
construction material, designated countries do not include the Caribbean Basin Countries.

Parent topic: Subpart 25.6 - American Recovery and Reinvestment Act-Buy American statuteConstruction Materials
Amendment to Class A Warrent Agreement



 Exhibit 10.72 
 AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 CLASS A WARRANT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to the Class A Warrant Agreement dated
December 13, 2006 (the “Agreement”) is made as of May 13, 2009 by and between Middle Kingdom Alliance Corporation (the “Company”) and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (“Warrant Agent”).

 WHEREAS, the Company and Warrant Agent are parties to the Agreement; 
 WHEREAS, the Company completed an offering of its securities on December 13, 2006 pursuant to which it issued, among other securities, Class A
warrants pursuant to the terms of the Agreement; 
 WHEREAS, the prospectus included in the registration statement pursuant to which the
Class A warrants were issued (the “Prospectus”) stated that if no registration statement is effective permitting the sale of the shares of common stock underlying the Class A warrants, that the Class A warrants may be
exercised on a cashless basis commencing one year after such warrants are initially exercisable; 
 WHEREAS, the parties inadvertently failed
to include the foregoing provision in the Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Warrant Agent desire to amend the terms and conditions
contained in the Agreement to reflect the terms in the Prospectus. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Warrant Agent agree as follows. 
  

	1.	Section 3.3.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following sentence to the end of the current section: 

 “Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time commencing one year after the commencement of the Exercise period, if no registration statement is
effective permitting the sale of the shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrants, the Warrants may be exercised on a “cashless” basis.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment to the Class A Warrant Agreement as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	 CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY,
 as Trustee

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Steven G. Nelson

	Name:	 	Steven G. Nelson
	Title:	 	Chairman
	
	MIDDLE KINGDOM ALLIANCE CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Bernard J. Tanenbaum III

	Name:	 	Bernard J. Tanenbaum III
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10022.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10022.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
<page>                                                         Exhibit 31.1

Certification required by Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Kevin T. Knight, President of Nordstrom Credit, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Nordstrom Credit, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: December 3, 2004                    /s/ Kevin T. Knight
      -----------------                   -----------------------------
                                          Kevin T. Knight
                                          President