alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
15.403-2 Other circumstances where certified cost or pricing data are not required.       (a)                    						            The exercise of an option at the price established at contract award or initial negotiation does not require submission of certified cost or pricing data.                                          (b)                    						            Certified cost or pricing data are not required for proposals used solely for overrun funding or interim billing price adjustments.    **Parent topic:** 15.403 Obtaining certified cost or pricing data.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 29, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                             695
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      802
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,494
<PP&E>                                          19,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,950
<BONDS>                                          1,471
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,709
<SALES>                                         55,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,416
<CGS>                                           17,070
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,175
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,585
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    655
<INCOME-TAX>                                        74
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                581
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       581
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bruce V., Appellant.

ant. Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, imposed February 7, 1980. The appeal brings up for review the denial of defendant’s application for youthful offender treatment. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by providing that defendant’s application for youthful offender treatment is granted. As so modified, sentence affirmed. The interests of justice are best served by granting the application for youthful offender treatment. Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, concur.
§ 3565.102 Lender eligibility. An eligible lender must be a licensed business entity or HFA in good standing in the state or states where it conducts business; be approved by the Agency; and meet at least one of the criteria contained below. Lenders who are not eligible may participate in the program if they maintain a correspondent relationship with a lender who is eligible. An eligible lender must: ( a ) Meet the qualifications of, and be approved by, the Secretary of HUD to make multifamily housing loans that are to be insured under the National Housing Act;
( b ) Meet the qualifications and be approved by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae to make multifamily housing loans that are to be sold to or securitized by such corporations;
( c ) Be a state or local HFA, or a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank system, with a demonstrated ability to underwrite, originate, process, close, service, manage, and dispose of multifamily housing loans in a prudent manner;
( d ) Be a lender who meets the requirements for Agency approval contained in this subpart and has a demonstrated ability to underwrite, originate, process, close, service, manage, and dispose of multifamily housing loans in a prudent manner; or
( e ) Be a lender who meets the following requirements in addition to the other requirements of this subpart and of subpart I of this part: ( 1 ) Have qualified staff to perform multifamily housing servicing and asset management;
( 2 ) Have facilities and systems that support servicing and asset management functions; and
( 3 ) Have documented procedures for carrying out servicing and asset management responsibilities.
[63 FR 39458, July 22, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 2931, Jan. 19, 2005]
EX-33 (m)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Custody
1015 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55414


Appendix I


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the
period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006, for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the
Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The
Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria. In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth
by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of
Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the
Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By: /s/ Shari L. Gillund
Shari L. Gillund

Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: March 1, 2007
§ 51.3410 Grades. ( a ) “U.S. No. 1 Processing” consists of potatoes which meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Basic requirements: ( i ) Similar varietal characteristics;
( ii ) Moderately firm; and,
( iii ) Fairly well shaped.
( 2 ) Free from: ( i ) Freezing or freezing injury;
( ii ) Blackheart;
( iii ) Late Blight Tuber Rot;
( iv ) Southern Bacterial Wilt;
( v ) Bacterial Ring Rot;
( vi ) Insects, worms or larvae;
( vii ) Soft rot and wet breakdown; and,
( viii ) Loose sprouts, dirt and foreign material.
( 3 ) Free from damage by any cause.
( 4 ) *Size.* Unless otherwise specified, individual potatoes shall be not less than 2 inches in diameter or 4 ounces in weight. Percentage(s) of a larger size(s) and/or a maximum size may be specified.
( b ) “U.S. No. 2 Processing” consists of potatoes or usable pieces of potatoes which meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Basic requirements: ( i ) Similar varietal characteristics;
( ii ) Moderately firm; and,
( iii ) Not seriously misshapen.
( 2 ) Free from: ( i ) Freezing or freezing injury;
( ii ) Blackheart;
( iii ) Late Blight Tuber Rot;
( iv ) Southern Bacterial Wilt;
( v ) Bacterial Ring Rot;
( vi ) Insects, worms or larvae;
( vii ) Soft rot and wet breakdown; and,
( viii ) Loose sprouts, dirt and foreign material.
( 3 ) Free from serious damage by any cause.
( 4 ) *Size.* Unless otherwise specified, whole potatoes shall be not less than 11 ⁄ 2 inches in diameter, or usable pieces shall be not less than 4 ounces in weight. Percentage(s) of a larger size(s) and/or maximum size may be specified.
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Wentworth V, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin R. Keating,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
                Kevin R. KeatingKevin
                R. KeatingPrincipal
                Executive OfficerPrincipal
                Financial OfficerMarch
                31, 2008
#### § 4280.44 Limitation on number of loans or Grants to an Intermediary.

Depending on the amount of funds available, Rural Development may publish an announcement limiting an Intermediary to one selected Grant application and two selected loan applications in a fiscal year.
#### § 51.1239 Pops.

*Pops* means fully developed shells which contain practically no kernels.
2006-0628.

#### State v. Williams.

Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0136, 2006-Ohio-617. This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty postconviction case. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment, ¡

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Prentiss Pearson, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant "from benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 1, par. [a].) Claimant reported that he left his employment in Connecticut to return to New York City, intending to relocate there permanently; stating that *“*The only reason I made this move was to relocate in N. Y. C.” Upon this statement, he was by initial determination found to have voluntarily left the employment without good cause. After taking his appeal from that determination, however, he stated that he resigned because his employer told him that if he did not do so he would be discharged for failure to supply complete employment records for 10 years past. The Referee found that these “ latest contentions are incredible” and the board affirmed. This determination of credibility was for the board and upon this record cannot be disturbed by us. Directly in point is *Matter of Perry*(Catherwood) (24 A D 2d 921, 922) in which we said: “Here claimant’s testimony was inconsistent with her initial statement and at variance with the employer’s report; but even had her testimony been entirely uncontradicted it would still have been the board’s prerogative to assay its credibility and, absent any indication of the arbitrary exercise of the power thus conferred upon the board, as upon administrative agencies generally, we are without power to disturb its determination.” Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Brink, JJ., concur.
#### § 51.2651 Mature.

*Mature* means that the cherries have reached the stage of growth which will insure the proper completion of the ripening process.
<<Prev Rule Next Rule>> TITLE 4 

### AGRICULTURE PART 1 

### TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CHAPTER 19 

### QUARANTINES AND NOXIOUS AND INVASIVE PLANTS SUBCHAPTER T 

### NOXIOUS AND INVASIVE PLANTS RULE §19.300 Noxious and Invasive Plant List (a) The following plants have serious potential to cause economic or ecological harm to the state. Attached Graphic (b) Unless permitted by the Texas Department of Parks and Wildlife Code §66.007 or by the Texas Department of Agriculture, a person commits an offense under the Texas Agriculture Code, §71.152, if the person sells, distributes or imports into the state the plants listed in subsection (a) of this section in any live form. (c) For the purpose of this section, the term "distributes" does not include the accidental or unintentional movement of noxious plant material in the course of legitimate construction activities or agricultural activities, including but not limited to, re-seeding, transportation of agricultural products and the movement of farm or earth moving equipment.

Source Note: The provisions of this §19.300 adopted to be effective January 6, 2005, 29 TexReg 12163; amended to be effective June 10, 2007, 32 TexReg 3171

Next Page Previous Page : Texas Administrative Code http://info.sos.state.tx.us/pls/pub/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=R&app=9&p_d...

1 of 1 3/30/2012 1:40 PMFigure: 4 TAC §19.300(a) Common Name Botanical Name Noxious plants alligatorweed Alternanthera philoxeroides balloonvine Cardiospermum halicacabum Brazilian peppertree Schinus terebinthifolius broomrape Orobanche ramosa camelthorn Alhagi camelorum Chinese tallow tree Triadica sebifera Eurasian watermilfoil Myriophyllum spicatum giant duckweed Spirodela oligorrhiza giant reed Arundo donax hedge bindweed Calystegia sepium hydrilla Hydrilla verticillata itchgrass Rottboellia cochinchinensis Japanese dodder Cuscuta japonica kudzu Pueraria montana var. lobata lagarosiphon Lagarosiphon major paperbark Melaleuca quinquenervia purple loosestrife Lythrum salicaria rooted waterhyacinth Eichhornia azurea saltcedar Tamarix spp. salvinia Salvinia spp. serrated tussock Nassella trichotoma torpedograss Panicum repens Figure: 4 TAC §19.300(a) http://info.sos.state.tx.us/fids/200701978-1.html

1 of 2 3/30/2012 1:32 PMtropical soda apple Solanum viarum water spinach Ipomoea aquatica waterhyacinth Eichhornia crassipes waterlettuce Pistia stratiotes Invasive plants Chinese tallow tree Triadica sebifera kudzu Pueraria montana var. lobata saltcedar Tamarix spp. tropical soda apple Solanum viarum Figure: 4 TAC §19.300(a) http://info.sos.state.tx.us/fids/200701978-1.html

2 of 2 3/30/2012 1:32 PM
#### Henry Manley, III, Respondent, v Pandick Press, Inc., Appellant.

The motion for reargument is granted and upon reargument the order of this court entered February 14,1980 is adhered to. We are now advised that several invoices referred to in our memorandum decision as having been billed subsequent to May 31, 1978 were in fact billed on or before that date, and we acknowledge that correction. This, however, does not alter our essential finding that the record is insufficient to establish an accord and satisfaction as a matter of law so as to entitle defendant to summary judgment. The motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is denied. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

§ 283.19 ALJs. ( a ) *Assignment.* No ALJ shall be assigned to serve in any appeal who: ( 1 ) Has any pecuniary interest in any matter or business involved in the appeal,
( 2 ) Is related by blood or marriage to any party in the appeal, or
( 3 ) Has any conflict of interest which might impair the ALJ's objectivity in the appeal.
( b ) *Disqualification of ALJ.* ( 1 ) Any party to the appeal may, by motion, request that the ALJ withdraw from the appeal on one or more of the grounds set out in paragraph (a) of this section. Such motion shall set forth with particularity the alleged grounds for disqualification. The ALJ may then either rule upon or certify the motion to the Judicial Officer, but not both.
( 2 ) The ALJ may withdraw from any appeal for any reason deemed by the ALJ to be disqualifying.
( c ) *Powers.* ( 1 ) Subject to review as provided elsewhere in this part, the ALJ, in any assigned appeal, shall have the power to: ( i ) Rule upon motions and requests;
( ii ) Set the time and place of a pre-hearing conference and the time of the hearing, adjourn the hearing from time to time, and change the time of the hearing;
( iii ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( iv ) Regulate the scope and timing of discovery;
( v ) Issue and enforce subpoenas as authorized under 7 U.S.C. 2023(a) and these rules;
( vi ) Summon and examine witnesses and receive evidence at the hearing;
( vii ) Appoint expert witnesses in accordance with the provisions of Rule 706 of the Federal Rules of Evidence;
( viii ) Admit or exclude evidence;
( ix ) Hear oral argument on facts or law;
( x ) Upon motion of a party, decide cases, in whole or in part, by non-oral hearing procedures under subpart C of this part where there is no disputed material issue of fact;
( xi ) Perform all acts and take all measures necessary for the maintenance of order, including the exclusion of contumacious counsel or other persons;
( xii ) Take all other actions authorized under the Act and these rules, including the extension of time upon motion of a party or *sua sponte* for cause shown.
( 2 ) The ALJ may not rule upon the validity of Federal statutes or regulations.
( d ) *Who may act in the absence of the ALJ.* In case of the absence of the ALJ or the ALJ's inability to act, the powers and duties to be performed by the ALJ under these rules of practice in connection with any assigned appeal may, without abatement of the appeal, unless otherwise directed by the Chief Judge, be assigned to any other ALJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RANDY HARRY BROOMALL, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 554 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of January, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Editorial Note on Part 47
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 64 FR 38108, July 15, 1999.

§ 47.47 Additional definitions. The following definitions, which are in addition to those in § 47.2 (a) through (h), shall be applicable to proceedings under §§ 47.47 through 47.49. ( a ) *Chief* means the Chief of the PACA Branch, or any officer or employee to whom authority has heretofore lawfully been delegated or to whom authority may hereafter lawfully be delegated by the Chief, to act in such capacity.
( b ) *PACA Branch* means that PACA Branch of the Fruit and Vegetable Programs.
( c ) *Petition for review* means the document filed requesting review by an Administrative Law Judge of the Chief's determination.
[61 FR 11504, Mar. 21, 1996]
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 5:03cr12-RH/WCS

DANIEL MARCUCCI,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

REDUCTION OF SENTENCE

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 23) and the objections thereto (document 24). I have

reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the opinion

of the court. Defendant's motion for reduction of sentence (document 22) is

DENIED.

SO ORDERED this 7th day of December, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 5:03-cr-00012-RH-WCS Document 25 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 232 (Friday, December 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30008]



[[Page 75452]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Dixie Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Dixie Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Panguitch, 
Utah and Santa Clara, Utah. The committee is meeting as authorized 
under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act 
(Pub. L. 110-343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act. The purpose of the two meetings are to discuss Title II project 
proposals.

DATES: December 7, 2010, 9 a.m. & January 6, 2011, 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: December 7, 2010 meeting will be held at Garfield County 
Courthouse, 55 South Main Street, Panguitch, Utah. January 6, 2011 
meeting will be held at the Santa Clara Town Hall, 2721 Santa Clara 
Drive, Santa Clara, Utah. The public is invited to attend both 
meetings.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenton Call, RAC Coordinator, Dixie 
National Forest, (435) 865-3730; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d5e565e5c51517d5b4e135b585913484e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d2b1b9b1b3bebe92b4a1fcb4b7b6fca7a1">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meetings are open to the public. The 
following business will be conducted: (1) Welcome and committee 
introductions; (2) Review of project proposals; (3) Category discussion 
of proposals; (4) RAC discussion and decision on proposals, and (5) 
Public comment on any propopals. Persons who wish to bring related 
matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements 
with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public input will 
be accepted by the RAC during the meetings.

    Dated: November 11, 2010.
Robert G. MacWhorter,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-30008 Filed 12-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### §§ 4287.104-4287.105 [Reserved]