alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

REGULUS

    Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria

1.    Pursuant to Subpart 229.1100 -- Asset Backed Securities, l7 C.F.R.
      ss.ss.229.1100-229.1123 ("Regulation AB"), Regulus Group LLC, is
      responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria
      applicable to the remittance processing services it provides to customers
      who are issuers or servicers of asset backed securities transactions and
      who have requested confirmation of Regulus' compliance in connection with
      loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset
      backed securities transactions (the "Platform"). Remittance processing is
      a service whereby check payments that are remitted by mail to a post
      office box are collected, processed through a highly automated data
      capture system, and prepared for deposit to a bank account held by the
      beneficiary of the payment.

2.    The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB were
      used in Regulus' assessment of compliance. Regulus has concluded that the
      servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of
      Regulation AB are applicable to the servicing activities it performs with
      respect to the Platform (such criteria the "Applicable Servicing
      Criteria"). Regulus has concluded that the remainder of the servicing
      criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are inapplicable to
      the activities it performs with respect to the Platform because Regulus
      does not participate in the servicing activities referenced by such
      servicing criteria.

3.    As of and for the year ending December 3l, 2006, Regulus has complied in
      all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria set forth in
      Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB.

4.    KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
      report on Regulus' assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
      Criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2006. A copy of that
      attestation report is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

/s/ Kimberlee Clark
-----------------------------------
Kimberlee Clark
Chief Financial Officer

July 17, 2007
```
Subpart 23.10 - Federal Compliance with

Right-to-Know Laws and Pollution Prevention

Requirements

Parent topic: Part 23 - Environment, Energy and Water Efficiency, Renewable Energy

Technologies, Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free Workplace

23.1000 Scope.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for obtaining information needed for Government-

(a) Compliance with right-to-know laws and pollution prevention requirements;

(b) Implementation of an environmental management system (EMS) at a Federal facility; and

(c) Completion of facility compliance audits (FCAs) at a Federal facility.

23.1001 Authorities.

(a) Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of1986, 42 U.S.C.11001-11050 (EPCRA).

(b) Pollution Prevention Act of1990, 42 U.S.C.13101-13109 (PPA).

(c) Executive Order 13423 of January 24, 2007, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and

Transportation Management.

(d) Executive Order 13514 of October 5, 2009, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and

Economic Performance.

23.1002 Applicability.

The requirements of this subpart apply to facilities owned or operated by an agency in the customs

territory of the United States.

23.1003 Definitions.

As used in this subpartFederal agency means an executive agency (see 2.101).
23.1004 Requirements.

(a) Federal facilities are required to comply with-

(1) The emergency planning and toxic release reporting requirements in EPCRA and PPA; and

(2) The toxic chemical, and hazardous substance release and use reduction goals of sections 2(e) and

3(a)(vi) of Executive Order 13423.

(b) Pursuant to EPCRA, PPA, E.O. 13423, and any agency implementing procedures, every new

contract that provides for performance on a Federal facility shall require the contractor to provide

information necessary for the Federal agency to comply with the-

(1) Requirements in paragraph (a) of this section; and

(2) Requirements for EMSs and FCAs if the place of performance is at a Federal facility designated

by the agency.

23.1005 Contract clause.

(a) Insert the clause at 52.223-5, Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information, in solicitations

and contracts that provide for performance, in whole or in part, on a Federal facility.

(b) Use the clause with its Alternate I if the contract provides for contractor-

(1) Operation or maintenance of a Federal facility at which the agency has implemented or plans to

implement an EMS; or

(2) Activities and operations-

(i) To be performed at a Government-operated Federal facility that has implemented or plans to

implement an EMS; and

(ii) That the agency has determined are covered within the EMS.

(c) Use the clause with its Alternate II if-

(1) The contract provides for contractor activities on a Federal facility; and

(2) The agency has determined that the contractor activities should be included within the FCA or an

environmental management system audit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR FISCAL QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<CASH>                              236,255
<SECURITIES>                        146,952
<RECEIVABLES>                        90,120
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                         379,418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,606,849
<PP&E>                            4,109,090
<DEPRECIATION>                    1,263,977
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   16,400,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             2,653,241
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                         140,143
<COMMON>                            408,424
<OTHER-SE>                       12,677,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     16,400,910
<SALES>                              74,070
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     74,070
<CGS>                                65,878
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        65,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,362,551
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   16,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (2,365,773)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (2,365,773)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (2,365,773)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.06)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000757545
<NAME> 84A
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         128,102
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  146,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               274,746
<PP&E>                                      18,233,856
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,182,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,325,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,730
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,281,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,325,998
<SALES>                                        222,452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               223,924
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  280,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (56,414)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (56,414)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (56,414)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
15.407-5 Estimating systems.

(a) Using an acceptable estimating system for proposal preparation benefits both the Government

and the contractor by increasing the accuracy and reliability of individual proposals. Cognizant audit

activities, when it is appropriate to do so, shall establish and manage regular programs for reviewing

selected contractors’ estimating systems or methods, in order to reduce the scope of reviews to be

performed on individual proposals, expedite the negotiation process, and increase the reliability of

proposals. The results of estimating system reviews shall be documented in survey reports.

(b) The auditor shall send a copy of the estimating system survey report and a copy of the official

notice of corrective action required to each contracting office and contract administration office

having substantial business with that contractor. Significant deficiencies not corrected by the

contractor shall be a consideration in subsequent proposal analyses and negotiations.

Parent topic: 15.407 Special cost or pricing areas.
#### In the Matter of Bernard Fryshman, Petitioner, v. State Division of Human Rights, Respondent.

Proceeding under section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board dated January 26, 1970, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights dated October 2, 1969, dismissing petitioner’s complaint that he had been denied a teaching position in the Seek program of Queens College because of his race and religion. Order of the Human Rights Appeal Board affirmed *985and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs. No opinion. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Kleinfeld and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement




          SECOND AMENDMENT, dated as of April 24, 2009, and effective, January 1, 2009 (this
“Amendment”), to the Employment Agreement dated as of February 7, 2008, and as first amended
December 31, 2008, (the “Agreement”) by and between Harland Clarke Holdings Corp., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”) and Daniel Singleton (the “Executive”).




          WHEREAS, the parties desire to further amend the Agreement in certain respects; and agree that
all other terms and conditions of the Agreement and as previously amended shall otherwise remain in
place, except as expressly further amended herein.




          NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties do hereby agree as follows,
effective as of the date set forth below:




          1. The phrase “and Chief Operating Officer” shall be added to Section 1.1 of the Agreement
after the phrase “Executive Vice President”.




          2. The year 2009 shall be deleted and the year 2010 added in its place to Section 2.1 of the
Agreement.




          3. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws
of the State of Delaware, without regard to principles of conflicts of laws thereof that would call
for the application of the substantive law of any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware.




          4. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed
to be a duplicate original, but all of which, taken together, shall constitute a single instrument.




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Second Amendment to the Agreement to be
executed and delivered as of the date written first above.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP.

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	By:  	 
	 	 	Title: 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Daniel Singleton
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the annual
report on Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                      Canadian dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    AUG-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                      1.4965
<CASH>                            2,018,122
<SECURITIES>                        261,926
<RECEIVABLES>                     2,764,272
<ALLOWANCES>                        229,813
<INVENTORY>                         260,868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  5,909,181
<PP&E>                            8,701,623
<DEPRECIATION>                    3,549,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   14,802,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,872,121
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                          10,917
<COMMON>                            171,635
<OTHER-SE>                       10,610,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     14,802,021
<SALES>                          13,420,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 13,420,642
<CGS>                             5,155,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     5,155,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  7,702,771
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    136,888
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   98,440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (866,273)
<INCOME-TAX>                        150,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (971,497)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (971,497)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.36)



</TABLE>
Exhibit
23.1
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 of our reports, dated March 16, 2009, relating to the financial statements
and financial highlights of Kohlberg Capital Corporation (which report expresses
an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
valuation of investments whose fair values have been estimated by management in
the absence of readily determinable fair values), and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Kohlberg Capital Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2008.
  DELOITTE
& TOUCHE LLP
 
 New
York, New York
 March
16, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MARIO S. FAULK,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-263-TKW-MJF

ANDY PACE, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 9). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s 

determination that this case should be dismissed as an abuse of the judicial process

based on Plaintiff’s failure to fully disclose his litigation history. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b)(1) and

1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

3. The Clerk shall close the file.

Case 5:20-cv-00263-TKW-MJF Document 10 Filed 12/11/20 Page 1 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of December, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00263-TKW-MJF Document 10 Filed 12/11/20 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 33 Filed 06/28/21 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 33 Filed 06/28/21 Page 2 of 6
Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 33 Filed 06/28/21 Page 3 of 6
Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 33 Filed 06/28/21 Page 4 of 6
Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 33 Filed 06/28/21 Page 5 of 6
Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 33 Filed 06/28/21 Page 6 of 6
158 So.2d 613

#### James TOLBERT v. Roy THOMAS.

No. 47028.

Dec. 20, 1963.

In re: Roy Thomas applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writs refused. We find no error in the ruling complained of.

FOURNET, C. J., and HAMLIN, J., are of the opinion the writs should be granted.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ALIX FRECK,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-217-AW-GRJ

ALACHUA COUNTY LIBRARY 

DISTRICT, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Defendants’ unopposed motion for an extension (ECF No. 6) is GRANTED. 

Plaintiff may file an amended complaint no later than October 15, 2020. Defendants’

deadline to respond to the operative complaint (ECF No. 1) is extended to October

22, 2020. If Plaintiff timely amends the complaint, Defendants will have 14 days 

from service to respond.

SO ORDERED on October 2, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00217-AW-GRJ Document 7 Filed 10/02/20 Page 1 of 1
#### § 54.29 Identification.

All official graders and supervisors of grading shall have their Agricultural Marketing Service identification cards in their possession at all times while they are performing any function under the regulations and shall identify themselves by such cards upon request.
157 So.2d 235

#### John J. MATASSA v. Clyde F. BEL, Sr., George Credo and The Times-Picayune Publishing Company.

No. 46968.

Nov. 12, 1963.

Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit.

156 So.2d 250.

Writ granted as to the sustaining of the exception of no cause of action filed by Bel and ■ Credo. Otherwise the writs are refused. -- ■
#### §§ 4288.138-4288.200 [Reserved]
#### § 28.907 Responsibilities of licensed gins or warehouses.

Each licensee shall be primarily responsible for drawing, identifying, handling, and shipping samples of cotton in accordance with this subpart and with instructions furnished by the Director or an authorized representative from time to time.
§ 3202.9 Recordkeeping requirements. ( a ) *Records.* Manufacturers and vendors shall maintain records documenting compliance with this part for each product that has received certification to use the label, as specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this section. ( 1 ) The results of all tests, and any associated calculations, performed to determine the biobased content of the product.
( 2 ) The date the applicant receives certification from USDA, the dates of changes in formulation that affect the biobased content of certified biobased products, and the dates when the biobased content of certified biobased products was tested.
( 3 ) Documentation of analyses performed by manufacturers to support claims of environmental or human health benefits, life cycle cost, sustainability benefits, and product performance made by the manufacturer.
( b ) *Record retention.* For each certified biobased product, records kept under paragraph (a) of this section must be maintained for at least three years beyond the end of the label certification period (*i.e.,* three years beyond the period of time when manufacturers and vendors cease using the certification mark). Records may be kept in either electronic format or hard copy format. All records kept in electronic format must be readily accessible, and/or provided by request during a USDA audit.
#### § 51.1415 Fairly uniform in color.

*Fairly uniform in color* means that the shells do not show sufficient variation in color to materially detract from the general appearance of the lot and that 85 percent or more of the kernels in the lot have skin color within the range of one or two color classifications.
19.811-1 Sole source.

(a) The contract to be awarded by the agency to the SBA shall be prepared in accordance with

agency procedures and in the same detail as would be required in a contract with a business

concern. The contracting officer shall use the Standard Form 26 as the award form, except for

construction contracts, in which case the Standard Form 1442 shall be used as required in

36.701(a).

(b) The contracting officer shall prepare the contract that the SBA will award to the 8(a) participant

in accordance with agency procedures, as if awarding the contract directly to the 8(a) participant,

except for the following:

(1) The award form shall cite 41 U.S.C. 3304(a)(5) or 10 U.S.C. 3204(a)(5) (as appropriate) as the

authority for use of other than full and open competition.

(2) Appropriate clauses shall be included, as necessary, to reflect that the contract is between the

SBA and the 8(a) contractor.

(3) The following items shall be inserted by the SBA:

(i) The SBA contract number.

(ii) The effective date.

(iii) The typed name of the SBA’s contracting officer.

(iv) The signature of the SBA’s contracting officer.

(v) The date signed.

(4) The SBA will obtain the signature of the 8(a) contractor prior to signing and returning the prime

contract to the contracting officer for signature. The SBA will make every effort to obtain signatures

and return the contract, and any subsequent bilateral modification, to the contracting officer within

a maximum of 10 working days.

(c) Except in procurements where the SBA will make advance payments to its 8(a) contractor, the

agency contracting officer may, as an alternative to the procedures in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this

subsection, use a single contract document for both the prime contract between the agency and the

SBA and its 8(a) contractor. The single contract document shall contain the information in

paragraphs (b) (1), (2), and (3) of this subsection. Appropriate blocks on the Standard Form (SF) 26

or 1442 will be asterisked and a continuation sheet appended as a tripartite agreement which

includes the following:

(1) Agency acquisition office, prime contract number, name of agency contracting officer and lines

for signature, date signed, and effective date.

(2) The SBA office, the SBA contract number, name of the SBA contracting officer, and lines for

signature and date signed.

(3) Name and lines for the 8(a) subcontractor’s signature and date signed.
(d) For acquisitions not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the contracting officer may

use the alternative procedures in paragraph (c) of this subsection with the appropriate simplified

acquisition forms.

Parent topic: 19.811 Preparing the contracts.
#### § 52.3759 Determining the rating for the factors which are scored.

The essential variations within each factor which is scored are so described that the value may be determined for each factor and expressed numerically. The numerical range within each factor which is scored is inclusive (for example “27 to 30 points” means 27, 28, 29, and 30 points).