alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
10.3

    


    CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION (IDENTIFIED BY **) HAS BEEN OMITTED BASED 

    UPON
A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 24b-2 OF 

    THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND HAS BEEN SEPARATELY FILED

    WITH
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

     

    February
28, 2009

     

    Larry
Smith

    Koch
Foods, Inc.

    9401 W.
Thunderbird Road, Suite 186

    Peoria,
AZ 85381

     

    Dear
Larry:

    


    As
discussed and agreed, Koch Foods, Inc. will supply to the El Pollo Loco system
the following chicken products:

    


    ** pounds
annually of whole birds, EPL Specification **.  Pricing will be ** per
pound FOB; ** per pound delivered into MBM, Rancho Cucamonga, CA.

    


    ** pounds
annually of saddle cut chicken, EPL Specification **.  Pricing will be
** per pound FOB; ** per pound delivered to MBM, Rancho Cucamonga,
CA.

    


    Up to **
pounds annually of fresh pre-marinated thigh meat, EPL Specification
**.  Pricing will be ** per pound FOB; ** per pound delivered into
MBM, Rancho Cucamonga, CA.

    


    Frozen
pre-marinated thigh meat, EPL Specification **.  ** per pound FOB, **
per pound delivered MBM, Rancho Cucamonga and MBM, Pleasanton.

    


    As part
of this Purchase Agreement, Supplier warrants that the prices for the items
identified herein are not higher than those currently extended to any other
customer for the same or like items in equal or less quantities. If Supplier
reduces its price for such items to any other customer during the term of this
Purchase Agreement, Supplier agrees to correspondingly reduce the price quoted
herein.

    


    El Pollo
Loco’s decision to enter into this Purchase Agreement is independent of any
support your firm may or may not choose to provide to the El Pollo Loco
system.

    


    This
Purchase Agreement is subject to and incorporates the General Terms and
Conditions of Supply (“T/C”) executed by the parties hereto and currently on
file with El Pollo Loco, Inc. The Purchase Agreement and the T/C collectively
constitute the entire agreement between the parties and supersede all prior or
contemporaneous oral or written agreements.

    


    Terms:  Net
7 Days.

    Pricing
contract period 03/01/09 through 2/28/10

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

    Please
sign and return both copies of this letter.  After I have received the
signed copy, I will sign and return a copy for your files.  Signing
this letter acknowledges acceptance of the terms and conditions as presented
above.

    


    Larry,
thank you for your help and support on this matter and please contact me with
any questions.

     

    
      	
              /S/
      LARRY P. SMITH

            	
              /S/
      GARY CAMPANARO

            
	
              Larry
      P. Smith

            	
              Gary
      Campanaro

            
	
              Koch
      Foods, Inc.

            	
              El
      Pollo Loco, Inc.

            


    

     

    cc:  Jennifer
Benus, Yvette Johnson/MBM
#### § 51.700 Discoloration.

*Discoloration* means russeting of light shade of golden brown caused by rust mite or other means. Lighter shades of discoloration caused by smooth or fairly smooth, superficial scars or other means may be allowed on a greater area, or darker shades may be allowed on a lesser area, provided no discoloration caused by melanose or other means may affect the appearance of the fruit to a greater extent than the shade and amount of discoloration allowed for the grade.
**Exhibit 15.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-140083 on Form S-8 of our reports datedOctober 14, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc., its subsidiaries and its variable interest entity (collectively, the“Company”) (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the retrospective application of the authoritative pronouncement issued by Financial Accounting Standards Board regarding noncontrollinginterests in consolidated financial statements, which was adopted by the Company on June 1, 2009) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Companyfor the year ended May 31, 2010. 

/s/    Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd. 

Beijing, the People’s Republic of China 

October 14, 2010
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This
Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the
United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other
purpose.

The
undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of FNB Banking Company (the Company), hereby each
certify as follows:

The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company (the Report), which
accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | This
     10th day of August 2004.
| | ----------------------------------

| | /s/  J. Charles CopelandJ. Charles CopelandChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/  Mark FlowersMark FlowersChief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting and Financial
Officer)
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to FNB Banking Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 2165** 

KIMBERLY JACKSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant , v. EDWARD S. COHN, et al Substitute Trustees , Defendant

- Appellee
. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. George Levi Russell, III , District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 00 393

- GLR )

Submitted : November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Kimberly Jackson , Appellant Pro Se. Michael Joseph McKeefery, COHN, GOLDBERG & DEUTSCH, LLC, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kimberly Jackson appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing her complaint for failure to state a claim and lack of jurisdiction . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Cohn , No. 1:12

- cv - 00393

- GLR (D. Md. Aug. 10, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

m aterials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
47.103-2 Contract clause.       Complete and insert the clause at 52.247-67, Submission of Transportation Documents for Audit, in solicitations and contracts when a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated and the contract or a first-tier cost-reimbursement subcontract thereunder will authorize reimbursement of transportation as a direct charge to the contract or subcontract.    **Parent topic:** 47.103 Transportation Payment and Audit Regulation.
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RHONDA FLEMING,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv545–WS/MJF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and

WARDEN ERICCA STRONG,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 91) docketed May 12, 2022. The magistrate judge recommends that Plaintiff's

“Emergency Motion to Re-Urge TRO-Injunctive Relief” (ECF No. 60) and

“Motion for Emergency Hearing for Temporary Restraining Order and/or

Preliminary Injunction” (ECF No. 67) be denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has

responded (ECF Nos. 92, 101) to the report and recommendation, asserting that she

is unable to file objections because she has been denied access to her legal

Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 102 Filed 06/06/22 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

materials and the prison’s law library since March 25, 2022. She has not asked for

an extension of time to file objections, and none will be granted at this time.1

Upon review of the record, the court has determined that the

recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 91) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. Plaintiff’s Plaintiff's “Emergency Motion to Re-Urge TRO-Injunctive

Relief” (ECF No. 60) and “Motion for Emergency Hearing for Temporary

Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction” (ECF No. 67) are denied without

prejudice. 

3. Plaintiff’s “Motion for Permission to File More Than 25 Pages in

Complaint” (ECF No. 60) is DENIED as moot. 

4. The clerk shall return the case to the magistrate judge for further

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of June , 2022.

1 Plaintiff has complained about her inability to access legal materials for

over a year. See ECF Nos. 14, 33, 87, 92, 101. 

Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 102 Filed 06/06/22 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 102 Filed 06/06/22 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FILED AS PART OF FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1998
<CASH>                                          21,433
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  542,467
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,227
<INVENTORY>                                    376,913
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,068,244
<PP&E>                                       1,704,054
<DEPRECIATION>                                 838,391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,840,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          937,683
<BONDS>                                      1,283,683
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           228
<OTHER-SE>                                     394,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,840,362
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,590,661
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,441,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,447
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,391
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,314
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,077
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,077
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.74<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.70<F1>
        
<FN>
(1) Earnings per share have been prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
"Earnings Per Share" and therefore basic and diluted earnings per share have
been entered in place of primary and fully diluted EPS, respectively.
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### § 51.1240 Paper ends.

*Paper ends* means peanuts which have very soft and/or very thin ends.
4.1008 Solicitation provision.

Insert the provision at 52.204-22, Alternative Line Item Proposal, in all solicitations.

Parent topic: Subpart 4.10 - Uniform Use of Line Items
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2165

KIMBERLY JACKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

EDWARD S. COHN, et al Substitute Trustees,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. George Levi Russell, III, District 

Judge. (1:12-cv-00393-GLR)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kimberly Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Joseph McKeefery, 

COHN, GOLDBERG & DEUTSCH, LLC, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kimberly Jackson appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing her complaint for failure to state a claim and lack 

of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Jackson v. Cohn, No. 1:12-cv-00393-GLR (D. 

Md. Aug. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 35.2
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
                 RFMSI SERIES 2006-S8 (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Executive Vice President
#### In the Matter of Brulene Cooperative Apt., Inc., Respondent, v Finance Administrator of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered September 23, 1979, affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Kassoff at Special Term. Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER LEE DEANS, 

 Petitioner, 

v. Case No. 3:20-cv-5767-LC-MJF 

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, 

 Respondent.

 / 

ORDER

 This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated October 13, 2020. (Doc. 7). Attempts have been made 

to furnish a copy of the Report and Recommendation and to afford him an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). All mail has been “Returned to Sender---Out of Jail.” 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I conclude that it should 

be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 

 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7), is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 

Case 3:20-cv-05767-LC-MJF Document 9 Filed 11/13/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Petitioner’s 

failure to comply with this court’s orders. 

 3 The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of November, 2020. 

 

 LACEY A. COLLIER 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

s/L.A. Collier 

Case 3:20-cv-05767-LC-MJF Document 9 Filed 11/13/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 5001.458 Other Federal, State, and local requirements. Beginning on the date of issuance of the loan note guarantee, lenders and borrowers must— ( a ) Coordinate with all appropriate Federal, State, local and Tribal agencies that may have jurisdiction or involvement in each project; and
( b ) Comply with all current Federal, State, local, and Tribal laws and rules, as well as applicable regulatory commission rules, that affect the project, the borrower, or lender. Compliance activities include, but are not limited to— ( 1 ) Organization and borrower's authority to design, construct, develop, operate, and maintain the proposed facilities;
( 2 ) Borrowing money, giving security, and raising revenues for repayment;
( 3 ) Land use zoning;
( 4 ) Health, safety, and sanitation standards as well as design and installation standards; and
( 5 ) Protection of the environment and consumer affairs.
#### § 58.140 Field service.

A representative of the plant shall arrange to promptly visit the farm of each producer whose milk tests positive for drug residue, exceeds the maximum somatic cell count level, or does not meet the requirements for acceptable milk. The purpose of the visit shall be to inspect the milking equipment and facilities and to offer assistance to improve the quality of the producer's milk and eliminate any potential causes of drug residues. A representative of the plant should routinely visit each producer as often as necessary to assist and encourage the production of high quality milk.

[58 FR 26913, May 6, 1993]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to

Cases Listed on Exhibit A

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Hope T. Cannon

ORDER

The Settlement Administrator, BrownGreer, has reported to the Court that the 

Claimants with complaints filed in this Court, as identified on Exhibit A to this Order,

are Registered Claimants in the Settlement Program who have been issued payment on 

a Settlement Award and that, pursuant to Section 5.13 of the Master Settlement 

Agreement (“MSA”), BrownGreer has provided to Defendants the Releases executed 

and submitted by such Claimants to become Registered Claimants under Section 5.2.3 

of the MSA. All Registered Claimants with filed complaints, including those on 

Exhibit A, were required by Section 5.2.4 of the MSA to submit to the Settlement 

Administrator a stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice, with the dismissal to be filed in 

the appropriate court after the expiration of the 98% Walkaway Right and payment to 

the Claimant on a Settlement Award. The 98% Walkaway Right expired without 

exercise, as the Participation Level in the Program exceeded 99%. 
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Claimants’ cases identified on Exhibit A are hereby DISMISSED 

WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to the terms of the MSA; however, the dismissals do 

not impact Claimants’ rights to receive future Settlement Award payment(s) for which 

they are eligible under the MSA.

2. The Clerk is directed to enter a copy of this Order on the main docket, at 

which point the dismissal with prejudice is effective as to the cases on Exhibit A. The 

Clerk is also directed to enter a copy of this Order without Exhibit A attached on the 

individual dockets of these cases and close the cases in their entirety for all purposes. 

The presence of this Order in the individual docket of a case reflects that the plaintiff(s)

and such case were identified on Exhibit A to this Order. 

SO ORDERED, on this 20th day of August, 2024.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19.811-2 Competitive.

(a) The contract will be prepared in accordance with 14.408-1(d), except that appropriate blocks on

the Standard Form 26 or 1442 will be asterisked and a continuation sheet appended as a tripartite

agreement which includes the following:

(1) The agency contracting activity, prime contract number, name of agency contracting officer, and

lines for signature, date signed, and effective date.

(2) The SBA office, the SBA subcontract number, name of the SBA contracting officer and lines for

signature and date signed.

(b) The process for obtaining signatures shall be as specified in 19.811-1(b)(4).

Parent topic: 19.811 Preparing the contracts.
#### § 51.1168 Slightly misshapen.

*Slightly misshapen* means that the fruit is not of the shape characteristic of the variety but is not appreciably elongated or pointed or otherwise deformed.
§ 460.5 Timing and issuance of payments and payment limitations. ( a ) The payment under this subpart will be issued, for each crop, to the same person or persons that received the qualifying prevented planting payment for that crop: ( 1 ) If the insured has an assignment of indemnity in effect on the insured crop, the payment under this subpart will be made jointly in the name of the insured and all applicable assignees.
( 2 ) In cases where there has been a death, disappearance, judicially declared incompetence, or dissolution of any insured person any payment under this subpart will be paid to the person or persons determined to be entitled to the qualifying prevented planting payment.
( b ) Any payments under this subpart will be made by USDA in a manner and at a time determined by the Administrator.
( c ) The total amount of payments received for prevented planting supplemental disaster payments under this subpart, applicable crop insurance policy indemnities, NAP payments, and any other applicable disaster relief payment will not exceed 90 percent of the loss as determined by the Secretary.
( d ) The payment limitations stated in 7 CFR 760.1507 are not applicable to prevented planting supplemental disaster payments.