alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Kitty Panzer, as Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur Lichter, Deceased, Appellant, v. Accelerated Trucking Corp. et al., Respondents.

Order entered June 19, 1968, setting aside a jury verdict unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to respondents. The record supports the Trial Justice’s decision. The remarriage of the sister was of no significance in the ultimate disposition. Concur—..Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, Nunez, McNally and Steuer, JJ.
#### JETTER et al., Appellants, v. SCOLLAN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by George J. Jetter and another against John Scollan. J. H. Hull, for appellants. M. Weinman, for respondent.

No opinion. Determination affirmed, with costs. Order filed. See 96 N. Y. Supp. 274.
#### § 3565.456 Filing a claim.

Once the lender has disposed of the property or the Agency has agreed to accept an assignment of the loan or conveyance of title to the property, the lender may file a claim for the guaranteed portion of allowable losses. All claim amounts must be calculated in accordance with this subpart and be approved by the Agency.
#### § 51.881 U.S. Extra Fancy Export.

“U.S. Extra Fancy Export” consists of grapes which meet the requirements for U.S. Extra Fancy Table and, in addition, meet the packaging requirements set forth in § 51.911.

[36 FR 9126, May 20, 1971. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981]
27.501 General.       Agencies shall provide necessary policy and procedures regarding foreign technical assistance agreements and license agreements involving intellectual property, including avoiding unnecessary royalty charges.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 27.5 - Foreign License and Technical Assistance Agreements
#### § 503.2 Admission.

No person will be admitted to PIADC, into animal holding areas, specified restricted areas, laboratory compounds, or into laboratories without having in his or her possession a specific approved pass or permit authorized by the Director, PIADC, to enter such areas. The pass must be presented at the request of the guard or other authorized PIADC safety representative.
#### § 457.118 [Reserved]
#### § 51.1438 Application of standards.

The grade of a lot of shelled pecans shall be determined on the basis of a composite sample drawn at random from containers in various locations in the lot. However, any identifiable container or number of containers in which the pecans are obviously of a quality or size materially different from that in the majority of containers, shall be considered as a separate lot, and shall be sampled and graded separately.
7.404 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the clause in 52.207-5, Option

to Purchase Equipment, in solicitations and contracts involving a rental or lease agreement with

option to purchase.

Parent topic: Subpart 7.4 - Equipment Acquisition
Subpart 45.2 - Solicitation and Evaluation

Procedures

Parent topic: Part 45 - Government Property

45.201 Solicitation.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert a listing of the Government property to be offered in all

solicitations where Government-furnished property is anticipated (see 45.102). The listing shall

include at a minimum-

(1) The name, part number and description, manufacturer, model number, and National Stock

Number (if needed for additional item identification tracking and management, and disposition);

(2) Quantity/unit of measure;

(3) Unit acquisition cost;

(4) Unique-item identifier or equivalent (if available and necessary for individual item tracking and

management); and

(5) A statement as to whether the property is to be furnished in an "as-is" condition and instructions

for physical inspection.

(b) When Government property is offered for use in a competitive acquisition, solicitations should

specify that the contractor is responsible for all costs related to making the property available for

use, such as payment of all transportation, installation or rehabilitation costs.

(c) The solicitation shall describe the evaluation procedures to be followed, including rental charges

or equivalents and other costs or savings to be evaluated, and shall require all offerors to submit the

following information with their offers-

(1) A list or description of all Government property that the offeror or its subcontractors propose to

use on a rent-free basis. The list shall identify the accountable contract under which the property is

held and the authorization for its use (from the contracting officer having cognizance of the

property);

(2) The dates during which the property will be available for use (including the first, last, and all

intervening months) and, for any property that will be used concurrently in performing two or more

contracts, the amounts of the respective uses in sufficient detail to support prorating the rent;

(3) The amount of rent that would otherwise be charged in accordance with FAR 52.245-9, Use and

Charges; and

(4) A description of the offeror's property management system, plan, and any customary commercial

practices, voluntary consensus standards, or industry-leading practices and standards to be used by

the offeror in managing Government property.

(d) Any additional instructions to the contractor regarding property management, accountability,

and use, not addressed in FAR clause 52.245-1, Government Property, should be specifically
addressed in the statement of work on the contract providing property or in a special provision.

45.202 Evaluation procedures.

(a) The contracting officer shall consider any potentially unfair competitive advantage that may

result from an offeror or contractor possessing Government property. This shall be done by

adjusting the offers by applying, for evaluation purposes only, a rental equivalent evaluation factor

as specified in FAR 52.245-9.

(b) The contracting officer shall ensure the offeror’s property management plans, methods,

practices, or procedures for accounting for property are consistent with the requirements of the

solicitation.
#### § 51.1160 Injury.

*Injury* means any specific defect described in § 51.1175, Table I; or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects which slightly detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the fruit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7







       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           11939152
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                 0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                   0
<EQUITIES>                                        32838
<MORTGAGE>                                            0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                         0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 11971990
<CASH>                                           337915
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                23301
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           449826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13773532
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 2277921
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                               49498
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  4037541
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            202733
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0 
<PREFERRED>                                           0 
<COMMON>                                         466239
<OTHER-SE>                                      6236474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13773532
<PREMIUMS>                                      4822269
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              439507 
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                41911
<OTHER-INCOME>                                        0
<BENEFITS>                                      3457602

<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                       24841     
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             695260 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (431807)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (431807)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0 
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (431807)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.02)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                    816500
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                    0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                      0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               2500043
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 3311531
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                   885000
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             5012

        




</TABLE>
August 16, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RONALD KELVIN PERRY, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00471-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:97-cr-00011-MP

EDWARD LAMONA JOHNSON, JR.,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 445, Motion to Dismiss Count I Based on Newly

Discovered Evidence Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33, filed by Defendant Edward Lamona

Johnson, Jr. Counts I and V, respectively, of the indictment charged the Defendant with

conspiring to possess with intent to distribute and conspiring to distribute crack cocaine, and

with knowingly and intentionally distributing crack cocaine. Defendant was found guilty of both

counts on July 12, 1997, after pleading not guilty. Defendant requests the Court to vacate the

judgment as to Count I based upon newly discovered evidence. Rule 33 allows a court to vacate

any judgment and grant a new trial if the interest of justice so requires. However, if the motion

is based upon newly discovered evidence, it “must be filed within 3 years afer the verdict or

finding of guilty.” FED. R. CRIM. P. 33(b)(1). Because Defendant’s motion was not filed within

three years after the finding of guilt, it is untimely. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss

is DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of November, 2006

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:97-cr-00011-MP Document 446 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2580 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rubber basketballs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rubber 

basketballs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN RUBBER BASKETBALLS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.95.09 Basketballs, having an external surface of rubber (provided for in subheading 

9506.62.80) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 2580 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000757545
<NAME> 84A.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         203,999
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  218,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               422,595
<PP&E>                                      18,214,204
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,424,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,211,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,180
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,157,754
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,211,934
<SALES>                                        864,492
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               873,845
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  628,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                245,343
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            245,343
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   245,343
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 52.48 Charges for plant survey and inspection.

The fees to be charged for a plant survey and inspection shall be at the rates prescribed in §§ 52.42 and 52.51.

[72 FR 10037, Mar. 7, 2007]
# Subpart 4.15 - [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**Part 4 - Administrative and Information Matters

## 4.1500 [Reserved]

## 4.1501 [Reserved]

## 4.1502 [Reserved]
#### § 51.646 Serious damage.

*Serious damage* means any specific defect described in Table 1 to § 51.652; or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which seriously detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the fruit.

[85 FR 68424, Oct. 29, 2020]
§ 550.117 Program income. ( a ) *Use of program income.* ( 1 ) Program income earned must be added to the non-assistance cooperative agreement, unless otherwise specified in the award.
( 2 ) When specified in the award, program income can be used towards fulfilling the cooperator's resource contributions for the same award.
( b ) *Disclosing program income.* The Cooperator must disclose program income in financial reports. Refer to § 550.123 of this part.
( c ) *Program income closeout.* The REE Agency and the Cooperator will negotiate appropriate uses of income earned balances, after the period of performance, as part of the agreement closeout process.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Hathias P. Poersch, as Surviving Trustee of a Trust Created by Frank C. O’Brien, Deceased. Gertrude E. Kelliher et al., Appellants; Marine Midland National Bank of Troy et al., as Executors of John G. Smith, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

Hotion to strike respondents’ appendix denied as premature, without costs and without prejudice to its renewal after settlement of the transcript and record on appeal. (Rules of Appellate Division, Third Department, rule 2, subd. [e].) Cross motions to dismiss appeals denied, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                         437,623
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               777,934
<PP&E>                                         10,922,984
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,912,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,049,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          419,815
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,004,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,049,436
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,105,308
<CGS>                                          397,103
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  472,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (9,171)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               228,850
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                15,841
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            15,841
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   15,841
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .94



</TABLE>
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Compliance (Legal)DisabilitiesEducational LegislationElementary Secondary EducationIndividualized Education ProgramsInterdisciplinary ApproachStudent Educational Objectives

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
§ 51.1142 U.S. No. 1 Bright. The requirements for this grade are the same as for U.S. No. 1 except that fruit shall have not more than one-fifth of its surface, in the aggregate, affected by discoloration. ( a ) For tolerances see § 51.1151.
( b ) Internal quality: Lots meeting the internal requirements for “U.S. Grade AA Juice (Double A)” or “U.S. Grade A Juice” may be so specified in connection with the grade. (See §§ 51.1176-51.1179.)
#### §§ 4279.163-4279.164 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  quarterly  report  of Tels  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report")  the
undersigned in the capacity and on the date indicated  below,  hereby  certifies
that  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and the  information
contained in this Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 23, 2004

/s/ Von Hampton
---------------
Von Hampton
Chief Executive Officer/President
Tels Corporation
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derrick L. Williams, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered November 26, 1979, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon a plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a term of one year of imprisonment in the Suffolk County Jail. The appeal brings up for review the denial of defendant’s application for youthful offender treatment. Judgment affirmed. The indictment herein charged the defendant with three counts of burglary in the third degree. It was alleged that in March, 1979, defendant, then 18 years old, burglarized three residences in Huntington, New York. The record discloses that in January, 1977, the defendant was convicted for petit larceny upon which he was granted an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal. Thereafter, in November, 1977, he was accorded youthful offender treatment and placed on probation for three years following a conviction upon his plea of guilty to petit larceny upon an amended indictment originally charging him with robbery in the third degree. While on probation he failed to co-operate with his probation officer and absconded in mid-1978. The defendant has committed acts of violence evincing a hostility to others and has demonstrated an unwillingness to correct his attitude toward society by abiding by the conditions of probation. Since the youthful offender treatment accorded the defendant following his conviction in 1977 was for petit larceny, a misdemeanor and not a felony, he was not precluded from eligibility for youthful offender treatment upon the instant conviction by virtue of CPL 720.10 (subd 2, par [b]). However, eligibility alone does not mandate youthful offender treatment. The granting of such benefit lies wholly within the discretion of.the court *(People v Santiago,*51 AD2d 1, revd on other grounds *64340 NY2d 990), and upon the present record we do not find any basis for finding that the court abused its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment (see *People v Bruce,*57 AD2d 1024), or for disturbing the sentence imposed. Gibbons, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.