alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROY EVERET ANDERSON, II,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5779-MCR-EMT

GRAHAM FOUNTAIN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on July 8, 

2021. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-05779-MCR-EMT Document 11 Filed 08/17/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5779-MCR-EMT

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 

10, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court.

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

Order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of August 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05779-MCR-EMT Document 11 Filed 08/17/21 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
31.2





CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION





I, Denise
Smith, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Silver Pearl Enterprises,
Inc.





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.








Date:
August 13, 2008





/s/ Denise
Smith





Denise
Smith


Chief
Financial Officer
25.301-4 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.225-19, Contractor Personnel in a Designated Operational Area or Supporting

a Diplomatic or Consular Mission outside the United States, in solicitations and contracts, other than

personal service contracts with individuals, that will require contractor personnel to perform outside

the United States—

(a) In a designated operational area during–

(1) Contingency operations;

(2) Humanitarian or peacekeeping operations; or

(3) Other military operations or military exercises, when designated by the combatant commander;

or

(b) When supporting a diplomatic or consular mission–

(1) That has been designated by the Department of State as a danger pay post (see

https://aoprals.state.gov/); or

(2) That the contracting officer determines is a post at which application of the clause FAR

52.225-19, Contractor Personnel in a Designated Operational Area or Supporting a Diplomatic or

Consular Mission outside the United States, is appropriate.

Parent topic: 25.301 Contractor personnel in a designated operational area or supporting a

diplomatic or consular mission outside the United States.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

GERMAINE R RUDDICK,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:20cv426-MW/HTC

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 2. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “This case is DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff is a three-striker under 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(g).” The Clerk shall also close the file. 

SO ORDERED on October 3, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00426-MW-HTC Document 3 Filed 10/03/20 Page 1 of 1
#### LEVY, Respondent, v. SALADINO, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Action by Ike Levy against Joseph Saladino.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court unanimously affirmed, with costs.
43.106 [Reserved]

Parent topic: Subpart 43.1 - General
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.508 Compliance with non-discrimination laws and regulations applicable to federally-assisted programs.

In conducting your operations and providing Assistance to your Portfolio Concerns, you must comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1 *et seq.*), the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (Pub. L. 94-135, Title III), and Title V of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1691 *et seq.*) and the following regulations promulgated by USDA to implement and enforce such laws: 7 CFR part 15.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RANDY A. HART, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-247-RV/MJF 

MARK INCH, et al., 

Defendants. 

 / 

ORDER 

 This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated October 6, 2020 (ECF No. 4). The parties have been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that 

the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

Case 5:20-cv-00247-RV-MJF Document 8 Filed 12/07/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

5:20-cv-247-RV/MJF 

2. This action is DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), without 

prejudice to Plaintiff initiating a new cause of action accompanied by payment of 

the $400.00 filing fee in its entirety. 

3. The clerk of the court shall close the case file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of December 2020. 

 s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:20-cv-00247-RV-MJF Document 8 Filed 12/07/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 51.1586 Serious damage. *Serious damage* means any injury or defect which seriously injures the edible or shipping quality, or the appearance of the individual potato or the general appearance of the potatoes in the container, or which cannot be removed without a loss of more than 10 percent of the total weight of the potato including peel covering defective area. Any one of the following defects or any combination of defects the seriousness of which exceeds the maximum allowed for any one defect shall be considered as serious damage: ( a ) Fairly smooth cuts such as are made by the digger, or by a knife to remove injury when both ends are clipped, or when more than an estimated one-fourth of the potato is cut away, or, in the case of long varieties, when the remaining portion of the clipped potato weighs less than 6 ounces; irregular types of cuts which seriously affect the appearance of the individual potato, or which cannot be removed without a loss of more than 10 percent of the total weight of the potato including peel covering defective area.
( b ) Shriveling, when the potato is excessively shriveled, spongy, or flabby.
( c ) Surface scab which covers an area of more than 50 percent of the surface of the potato in the aggregate.
( d ) Pitted scab which affects the appearance of the potato to a greater extent than the amount of surface scab permitted or causes a loss of more than 10 percent of the total weight of the potato including peel covering defective area.
( e ) Wireworm, grass root or similar injury, when any hole on potatoes ranging in size from 6 to 8 ounces is longer than one and one-fourth inches, or when the aggregate length of all holes is more than two inches; smaller potatoes shall have lesser amounts and larger potatoes may have greater amounts: *Provided,* That the removal of the injury by proper trimming, does not cause the appearance of such potatoes to be injured to a greater extent than that caused by the proper trimming of such injury permitted on a 6 to 8 ounce potato.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Matthew Walker, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, dated October 8, 1965, which denied, without a hearing, an application to set aside the decision of the trial court on a *Huntley*hearing and to reopen the same for the purpose of obtaining the testimony of the complainant. Appeal dismissed. Such an order is not separately appealable (see Code Crim. Pro., § 517; *People*v. *Farina,*2 A D 2d 776, affd. 2 N Y 2d 454; *People*v. *Giordano,*9 A D 2d 780). We have, nevertheless, examined the merits and, if we were not dismissing the appeal, we would affirm the order. [For prior related proceedings, see *People*v. *Walker,*22 A D 2d 927; 24 A D 2d 1079; *People*v. *Smith,*22 A D 927; 23 A D 2d 693,] Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
§ 51.311 Marking requirements. Variety (or varieties if more than one is packed in the container), grade, and the numerical count or minimum diameter of apples packed in a closed container shall be indicated on the container. For apple lots utilizing the combined diameter/weight designations for Red Delicious and Golden Delicious varieties, the minimum diameter and minimum weight of apples packed in a closed container shall be indicated on the container. ( a ) When the numerical count is not shown, the minimum diameter or, in the case of Red Delicious or Golden Delicious lots where minimum diameter/weight designations have been chosen, the minimum diameter and weight as designated in table II, shall be plainly stamped, stenciled or otherwise marked on the container in terms of whole inches, or whole inches and not less than eighth inch fractions thereof in the following manner: “A” inches or “B” grams, where “A” corresponds to one of the diameter measurements in terms of inches listed in table II and “B” corresponds to the weight measurement in grams as indicated in table II. Both diameter and weight must be shown using the word “or” between the given measurements.
( b ) The word “minimum,” or its abbreviation, when following a diameter size marking, means that the apples are of the size marked or larger. (*See* §§ 51.306 and 51.307.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 57

#### Editorial Note:

1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

#### § 57.112 Suspension of license or authority; revocation.

Pending final action by the Secretary, any person authorized to countersign a license to perform surveillance inspection services may, whenever such action is necessary to assure that any inspection service is properly performed, suspend or revoke any license to perform inspection services issued pursuant to this part by giving notice of such action to the respective licensee, accompanied by a statement of the reasons. Within 7 days after the receipt of the suspension or revocation notice and statement of reasons, the licensee may file an appeal in writing to the Secretary, supported by any argument or evidence that the licensee may wish to offer as to why the license should not be suspended or revoked. After the expiration of the 7-day period and consideration of such argument and evidence, the Secretary will take appropriate action regarding the suspension or revocation. When no appeal is filed within the prescribed 7 days, the license is revoked or suspended.

[69 FR 57166, Sept. 24, 2004]
#### § 51.341 U.S. No. 2.

“U.S. No. 2” consists of apples of one variety, unless designated as mixed varieties, which are not overripe, which are free from decay, worm holes, freezing injury and internal breakdown and free from any other defect, or combination of defects, the removal of which in the usual commercial preparation for use will cause a loss of more than 12 percent, by weight, of the apple.
§ 51.1147 U.S. No. 2 Bright. The requirements for this grade are the same as for U.S. No. 2 except that fruit shall have not more than one-fifth of its surface, in the aggregate, affected by discoloration. ( a ) For tolerances see § 51.1151.
( b ) Internal quality: Lots meeting the internal requirements for “U.S. Grade AA Juice (Double A)” or “U.S. Grade A Juice” may be so specified in connection with the grade. (See §§ 51.1176-51.1179.)
<PAGE>   1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-41279) pertaining to the Eateries, Inc. Omnibus Equity
Compensation Plan of our report dated March 26, 1997, except for the last
paragraph of Note 5, as to which the date is April 9, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Eateries, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 28, 1997.


                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
April 10, 1998
29.402-3 Tax on certain foreign

procurements.

(a) Insert the provision at 52.229-11, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements—Notice and

Representation, in solicitations, including solicitations using part 12 procedures for the acquisition

of commercial products and commercial services, unless one of the following exceptions applies:

(1) Acquisitions using simplified acquisition procedures that do not exceed the simplified acquisition

threshold (as defined in 2.101).

(2) Emergency acquisitions using the emergency acquisition flexibilities defined in part 18.

(3) Acquisitions using the unusual and compelling urgency authority per 6.303-2.

(4) Contracts with a single individual for personal services that will not exceed the simplified

acquisition threshold on an annual calendar year basis for all years of the contract.

(5) Acquisitions if the requiring activity identifies that the requirement is for certain foreign

humanitarian assistance contracts which are payments made by the U.S. Government agencies

pursuant to a contract with a foreign contracting party to obtain goods or services described in or

authorized under 7 U.S.C. 1691, et seq., 22 U.S.C. 2151, et seq., 22 U.S.C 2601 et seq., 22 U.S.C.

5801 et seq., 22 U.S.C. 5401 et seq., 10 U.S.C. 402, 10 U.S.C. 404, 10 U.S.C. 407, 10 U.S.C. 2557,

and 10 U.S.C. 2561.

(b) Insert the clause at 52.229-12, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements, in—

(1) Solicitations that contain the provision at 52.229-11, Tax on Certain Foreign

Procurements—Notice and Representation; and

(2) Resultant contracts in which the contractor has indicated that it was a foreign person in

solicitation provision 52.229-11, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements—Notice and Representation.

Parent topic: 29.402 Foreign contracts.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KIMBERLY GRIPPA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No.: 4:20cv457-MW/MAF 

RONALD RUBIN, 

Defendant. 

______________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Please take notice that Defendant Ronald L. Rubin hereby appeals to the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from the Appealable Order 

entered on March 22, 2023, which denied Mr. Rubin’s motion for summary 

judgment on litigation privilege grounds, and the subsequent Order of Clarification 

entered on April 4, 2023. See ECF Nos. 135, 138. The district court extended the 

time to file this notice for the maximum time allowed under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). 

The collateral order doctrine permits interlocutory appeals from decisions that 

are effectively unreviewable on appeal from the final judgment, including decisions 

on the application of absolute or qualified privileges. See Shanks v. AlliedSignal, 

Inc., 169 F.3d 988, 991 (5th Cir. 1999) (denial of a summary judgment motion based 

on litigation privilege is immediately appealable). Furthermore, whether the

litigation privilege applies “is a merits argument, not a jurisdictional one.” 

Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 148 Filed 05/22/23 Page 1 of 2
2

BancPass, Inc. v. Highway Toll Admin., L.L.C., 863 F.3d 391, 398 (5th Cir. 2017) 

(Jurisdiction over an appeal is “determined by focusing upon the category of order 

appealed from, rather than upon the strength of the grounds for reversing the order.”)

(citing Behrens v. Pelletier, 516 U.S. 299, 311 (1996)). 

Dated this 22nd day of May, 2023. 

RONALD RUBIN,

Defendant,

By Counsel,

/s/ James L. Kauffman

James L. Kauffman (FL # 012915) 

Bailey & Glasser LLP

1055 Thomas Jefferson Street NW

Suite 540

Washington DC 20007

T: 202.463.2101

F: 202.463.2103 

jkauffman@baileyglasser.com 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 22, 2023, a copy of the foregoing 

document was filed and served via the Court’s CM/ECF system to all counsel of 

record.

/s/ James L. Kauffman

James L. Kauffman

Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 148 Filed 05/22/23 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 -0583 IN THE MATTER OF: N.T., A Youth. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 7, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 30 2022

09/30/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0583
<page>                                                     Exhibit 32.2





                         NORDSTROM CREDIT, INC.

                            13531 EAST CALEY

                       CENTENNIAL, COLORADO 80111

              CERTIFICATION OF VICE PRESIDENT AND TREASURER
                  REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


I, Michael G. Koppel, the Vice President and Treasurer of Nordstrom
Credit, Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended October 30, 2004 (the "Report") filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission:


         -  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         -  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results
            of operations of the Company.


                                          /s/ Michael G. Koppel
                                          ----------------------
                                          Michael G. Koppel
                                          Vice President and Treasurer
                                          December 3, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Nordstrom Credit, Inc. and will be retained by
Nordstrom Credit, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 501.11 Mobile equipment and pedestrian traffic. ( a ) Drivers, operators, or pilots of all equipment whether or not motorized in or on Research Center property, or within the scope of Research Center activity, shall operate in a careful and safe manner at all times and shall comply with the signals and directions of guards, special policemen, or other authorized individuals, and all posted traffic signs;
( b ) The blocking of entrances, driveways, walks, railways, runways, loading platforms, or fire hydrants in or on Research Center property is prohibited;
( c ) Except in emergencies, parking or landing in or on Research Center property in other than designated areas is not allowed without a permit. Parking without authority, parking in unauthorized locations or in locations reserved for other persons, or parking continuously in excess of ten hours without permission, or contrary to the direction of posted signs is prohibited. This section may be supplemented from time to time by the issuance and posting of specific traffic directives as may be required, and when so issued and posted such directives shall have the same force and effect as if made a part hereof;
( d ) The operation of unlicensed gasoline powered vehicles is prohibited.