alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.1940 Integration of this part with other regulations applicable to USDA's programs. ( a ) *Intergovernmental review.* To the extent applicable to this part, the Agency will comply with 2 CFR part 415, subpart C, “Intergovernmental Review of Department of Agriculture Programs and Activities.” The Agency has not delegated this responsibility to SBA pursuant to § 4290.45.
( b ) *National flood insurance.* To the extent applicable to this part, the Agency will comply with subpart B of 7 CFR part 1806. The Agency has not delegated this responsibility to SBA pursuant to § 4290.45 of this part.
( c ) *Clean Air Act and Water Pollution Control Act requirements.* To the extent applicable to this part, the Agency will comply with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, section 306; the Clean Water Act, section 508; Executive Order 11738; and 40 CFR part 32. The Agency has not delegated this responsibility to SBA pursuant to § 4290.45 of this part.
( d ) *Historic preservation requirements.* To the extent applicable to this part, the Agency will comply with subpart F of 7 CFR part 1901. The Agency has not delegated this responsibility to SBA pursuant to § 4290.45 of this part.
( e ) *Lead-based paint requirements.* To the extent applicable to this part, the Agency will comply with subpart A of 7 CFR part 1924. The Agency has not delegated this responsibility to SBA pursuant to § 4290.45 of this part.
( f ) *Conflict of interest.* To the extent applicable to this part, the Agency will comply with 2 CFR 400.2, subpart D of 7 CFR part 1900, and RD Instruction 2045-BB. The Agency has not delegated this responsibility to SBA pursuant to § 4290.45.
( g ) *Civil rights impact analysis.* To the extent applicable to this part, the Agency will comply with RD Instruction 2006-P, “Civil Rights Impact Analysis.” The Agency has not delegated this responsibility to SBA pursuant to § 4290.45 of this part.
( h ) *Environmental requirements.* To the extent applicable to this part, the Agency will comply with 7 CFR part 1970. The Agency has not delegated this responsibility to SBA pursuant to § 4290.45.
( i ) *Appeals to the National Appeals Division for review of adverse decisions.* Applicants and RBICs have the right to request review by the National Appeals Division within the USDA of adverse decisions, as defined in 7 CFR 11.1, pursuant to 7 CFR part 11.
[69 FR 32204, June 8, 2004, as amended at 79 FR 76019, Dec. 19, 2014; 81 FR 11053, Mar. 2, 2016]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JENNY HANSSON, 

d/b/a CHERRY PEPPERS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:03cv182-MCR/WCS

CHARLES E. COOKE, 

and G. EDWARD COOKE,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff Hansson, proceeding pro se, has filed her amended complaint. Doc. 99.

Defendants are directed to file an Answer or, as may be appropriate, some other

responsive pleading in response to the amended complaint no later than August 23,

2005. 

Plaintiff Hansson has once again included a demand for a jury trial in the

amended complaint. Doc. 99, p. 5; cf. doc. 1, p. 5. As noted in the sixth report and

recommendation, doc. 86, there is an issue as to whether Plaintiff Hansson waived her

right to a jury trial through contractual agreement. Id., at 10-11. Both parties shall have

until September 2, 2005, in which to address the question of whether the right to jury

Case 5:03-cv-00182-RS-WCS Document 100 Filed 08/10/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:03cv182-MCR/WCS

trial is waived, or whether Defendants would support Plaintiff's request for a jury trial

regardless of the asserted contractual language.

Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED:

1. Defendants shall have until August 23, 2005, in which to file a response to

Plaintiff Hansson's amended complaint, doc. 99.

2. The parties shall have until September 2, 2005, to explain their respective

positions on the issue of whether a jury trial is required in this case as demanded by

Plaintiff in the amended complaint. 

3. Failure to comply with the order of this Court may result in a

recommendation of dismissal of this action.

4. The Clerk of Court shall return this file to the undersigned upon receipt of

Defendants' response to Plaintiff Hansson's amended complaint, or no later than August

23, 2005.

DONE AND ORDERED on August 10, 2005.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:03-cv-00182-RS-WCS Document 100 Filed 08/10/05 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71703-71704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29407]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, November 18, 2010, at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E. Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

Items To Be Discussed

    Correction and Approval of the Minutes for the Meeting of November 
4, 2010.
    Draft AO 2010-23: CTIA by Jan Witold Baran, Esq. and Caleb P. 
Burns, Esq.
    Draft AO 2010-24: Republican Party of San Diego County by C. April 
Boling, CPA, Treasurer.
    Draft AO 2010-26: The Honorable Brian Baird.
    Draft AO 2010-27: Obama for America by Judith L. Corley, Esq. and 
Rebecca H. Gordon, Esq.; and Biden for President by William J. Farah, 
Esq.
    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Commission Secretary and Clerk, at 
(202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

[[Page 71704]]


PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-29407 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:94cr4071-WS

STEFFANY FRAZIER, 4:12cv471-WS

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 158)

docketed July 18, 2012. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

section 2255 motion be summarily dismissed. The defendant has filed objections (doc.

159) to which the government has responded (doc. 160).

Upon review of the record in light of the defendant’s objections, this court has

determined that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 158) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The defendant’s 2255 motion (doc. 155) is hereby summarily DISMISSED for

lack of jurisdiction.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are summarily dismissed."

Case 4:94-cr-04071-WS-CAS Document 162 Filed 08/22/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

4. The clerk shall close Case No. 4:12cv471-WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of August , 2012.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 4:94cr4071-WS

Case 4:94-cr-04071-WS-CAS Document 162 Filed 08/22/12 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 12.3CERTIFICATIONI, Joyce I-Yin Hsu, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mindray Medical International Limited;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe company and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: June 27, 2007/s/ Joyce I-Yin Hsu
27.407 Rights to technical data in successful

proposals.

The clause at 52.227-23, Rights to Proposal Data (Technical), allows the Government to acquire

unlimited rights to technical data in successful proposals. Pursuant to the clause, the prospective

contractor is afforded the opportunity to specifically identify pages containing technical data to be

excluded from the grant of unlimited rights. This exclusion is not dispositive of the protective status

of the data, but any excluded technical data, as well as any commercial and financial information

contained in the proposal, will remain subject to the policies in subpart 15.2 or 15.6 (or agency

supplements) relating to proposal information (e.g., will be used for evaluation purposes only). If

there is a need to have access to any of the excluded technical data during contract performance,

consideration should be given to acquiring the data with limited rights, if they so qualify, in

accordance with 27.404-2(c).

Parent topic: Subpart 27.4 - Rights in Data and Copyrights
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Stanley Yankoski, Respondent, v. Carborundum Company et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board finding that claimant suffered permanent, partial disability and directing payments to continue at reduced earnings. It is not disputed that “ Claimant is permanently partially disabled and has a 75% earning capacity”; the sole issue raised here being whether there is substantial evidence to support the board’s determination that claimant sustained a causally related loss of earnings subsequent to his mandatory retirement on September 1, 1966. “An award for reduced earnings is sustainable where there is substantial proof of the effect of claimant’s disability upon her post-retirement earnings, or if the disability is even a *contributing*factor.” *(Matter of Luizzi*v. *Tobin Packing Co.,*29 A D 2d 1016, 1017 [emphasis added]; *Matter of Fromm*v. *Rochester Tel. Corp.,*22 A D 2d 728.) “ The fact claimant retires or is laid off from his job does not preclude an award where there is a subsequent loss of wage earning capacity which is due to claimant’s disability rather than to old age, general economic conditions or other factors unconnected with his disability.” *(Matter of O’Connell*v. *New York State Workmen’s Compensation Bd.,*14 A D 2d 945, 946, mot. for lv. to app. den. 11 N Y 2d 641.) On the instant record the board could properly find that claimant’s 1953 work-related back injury was a contributing factor in limiting his search to employment which required only light work and that he was unable to find employment within such limitation *(Matter of Rigatti*v. *Lollo & Sons,*31 A D 2d 871) and, accordingly, its decision must be affirmed. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1,000

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                      OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                       2,116
<SECURITIES>                                                 1,042
<RECEIVABLES>                                                8,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 3,325
<INVENTORY>                                                    661
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            10,509
<PP&E>                                                      15,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                              12,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              32,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       10,702
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                       122
<OTHER-SE>                                                  15,893
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                32,551
<SALES>                                                      9,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             9,656
<CGS>                                                        2,226
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                2,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             9,826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              2,516
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   159
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          2,675
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 2,675
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (0.24)



</TABLE>
# L_2015191EN.01000801.xml

| 17.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 191/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 191/8

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 1051/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 in order to provide for common rules on the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in exceptional circumstances

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 295 of 6 November 2013
  )

On page 4, Article 1(1):

for:

| ‘(1) | in Title II, the following Chapter is added:

  “CHAPTER IVa



  Specific measures in the case of serious deficiencies relating to external border control



  Article 19a
  Measures at external borders and support by the Agency

  1.   (...)’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(1)

in Title II, the following Chapter is added:

“CHAPTER IVa

“CHAPTER IVa

Specific measures in the case of serious deficiencies relating to external border control

Specific measures in the case of serious deficiencies relating to external border control

Article 19a

Measures at external borders and support by the Agency

1.   (...)’,

read:

| ‘(1) | in Title II, the following Chapter is added:

  “CHAPTER IVa



  Specific measures in the case of serious deficiencies relating to external border control



  Article 19b
  Measures at external borders and support by the Agency

  1.   (...)’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(1)

in Title II, the following Chapter is added:

“CHAPTER IVa

“CHAPTER IVa

Specific measures in the case of serious deficiencies relating to external border control

Specific measures in the case of serious deficiencies relating to external border control

Article 19b

Measures at external borders and support by the Agency

1.   (...)’.

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
      to U.S.C. Section 1350


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**




I,
      Charles Bentz, Chief Financial Officer of Asianada, Inc., hereby certify, to
      my
      knowledge, that the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period
      ending June 30, 2007 of Asianada, Inc. (the "Form 10-KSB") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Asianada, Inc.




Dated:
      October 15, 2007




/s/ Charles BentzCharles
                Bentz
                Chief
                  Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      by
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and shall be furnished
      to
      the SEC or its staff upon request.
#### § 52.3185 Moisture limits.

Dried prunes shall not exceed the moisture limits for the applicable grades and kind and size of packaging as designated in Table IV of this subpart except there is no moisture limit when safe and suitable preservatives have been added. “Moisture” means the percentage by weight of the finished dried prunes, exclusive of pits, that is moisture when determined by the Dried Fruit Moisture Tester Method or in accordance with methods that give equivalent results. The moisture limits in Table IV apply only to so-called “bulk packs” of dried prunes packaged in non-hermetically sealed containers holding 10 pounds or more of dried prunes when safe and suitable preservatives have not been added. Such containers include, but are not limited to, wood boxes or fiber boxes.

[30 FR 11596, Sept. 10, 1965. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981]
EXHIBIT 21

CareerEngine Network, Inc.

List of Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries

Matthews & Wright, Inc. (Delaware)
Snider, Williams & Co., Inc. (Delaware)
Randolph, Hudson & Co., Inc. (Delaware)
Shaw Realty Company, Inc. (New York)
Burrows, Hayes Company, Inc. (New York)
Dover, Sussex Company, Inc. (New York)
Housing Capital Corporation (New York)
Randel, Palmer & Co., Inc. (New York)
Parker, Reld & Co., Inc. (New York)
McAdam, Taylor & Co., Inc. (New York)
Helmstar Funding, Inc. (Pennsylvania)
Ryan, Jones & Co., Inc. (New York)
CareerEngine, Inc. (New York)
Advanced Digital Networks, Inc. (New York)
Alexander Edwards International, Inc. (New York)


Movieplex Realty Leasing, L.L.C. (New Jersey)
         (owned by Randolph, Hudson & Co., Inc. (99%) and
         Snider, Williams & Co., Inc. (1%))
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John Charles Greulich, Appellant, v. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 26, 1965, which, after a hearing, denied his request for assignment of counsel, dismissed the writ and remanded him to respondent’s custody. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Special Term for the purpose of (1) holding a new hearing; (2) assigning counsel to represent appellant on such hearing; and (3) making a determination *de novo*on the basis of the proof adduced upon such hearing. Ho questions of fact were considered by this court. It was error for the Special Term to have disregarded appellant’s request for the assignment of counsel to represent him and to have dismissed the writ without having granted such request *(People ex rel. Slade*v. *Follette,*26 A D 2d 823; cf. *People ex rel. De Groat*v. *Fay,*26 A D 2d 950). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 51.2128 Damage. *Damage* means any defect which materially detracts from the appearance of the individual kernel, or the edible or shipping quality of the almonds. Any one of the following defects or combination thereof, the seriousness of which exceeds the maximum allowed for any one defect shall be considered as damage: ( a ) Chipped and scratched kernels, when the affected area on an individual kernel aggregates more than the equivalent of a circle one-quarter inch (6.4 mm) in diameter;
( b ) Mold, when visible on the kernel, except when white or gray and easily rubbed off with the fingers;
( c ) Gum, when a film of shiny, resinous appearing substance affects an area aggregating more than the equivalent of a circle one-quarter inch (6.4 mm) in diameter;
( d ) Shriveling, when the kernel is excessively thin for its size, or when materially withered, shrunken, leathery, tough or only partially developed: Provided, that partially developed kernels are not considered damaged if more than three-fourths of the pellicle is filled with meat;
( e ) Brown spot on the kernel, either single or multiple, when the affected area aggregates more than the equivalent of a circle one-eighth inch (3.2 mm) in diameter; and,
( f ) Skin discoloration when more than one-half of the surface of the kernel is affected by very dark or black stains contrasting with the natural color of the skin.
§ 51.681 U.S. Fancy. “U.S. Fancy” consists of oranges which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Discoloration: Not more than one-tenth of the surface, in the aggregate, may be affected by discoloration. (See § 51.700.);
( 2 ) Firm;
( 3 ) Mature;
( 4 ) Similar varietal characteristics;
( 5 ) Smooth texture;
( 6 ) Well colored; and
( 7 ) Well formed.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Ammoniation;
( 2 ) Bruises;
( 3 ) Buckskin;
( 4 ) Caked melanose;
( 5 ) Creasing;
( 6 ) Decay;
( 7 ) Growth cracks;
( 8 ) Scab;
( 9 ) Skin breakdown;
( 10 ) Sprayburn;
( 11 ) Undeveloped segments;
( 12 ) Unhealed skin breaks; and
( 13 ) Wormy fruit.
( c ) Free from injury caused by: ( 1 ) Green spots;
( 2 ) Hail;
( 3 ) Oil spots;
( 4 ) Rough, wide or protruding navels;
( 5 ) Scale;
( 6 ) Scars;
( 7 ) Split navels; and
( 8 ) Thorn scratches.
( d ) Free from damage caused by: ( 1 ) Dirt or other foreign material;
( 2 ) Disease;
( 3 ) Dryness or mushy condition;
( 4 ) Insects;
( 5 ) Sunburn; and
( 6 ) Other means.
( e ) For tolerances see § 51.689.
[85 FR 68426, Oct. 29, 2020]