alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##  Status of Water Levels and Selected Water-Quality Conditions in the Sparta-Memphis Aquifer in Arkansas and the Sparta Aquifer in Louisiana, Spring-Summer 2001  

By T.P. Schrader

This   document is available in Portable Document Format (PDF):     SIR2004-5055 (4.07 MB)  Plate 1 (572 KB)  Plate 2 (2.43 MB)  Plate 3 (390 KB).  To view this document, you need the Adobe Acrobat® Reader installed on your computer. (A freecopy of the Acrobat® Reader may be downloaded from Adobe Systems      Incorporated.)

----

## Abstract

During the spring of 2001, water levels were measured in 427 wells in the Sparta-Memphis aquifer in Arkansas and the Sparta aquifer in Louisiana. Water-quality samples were collectedfor temperature and specific-conductance measurements during the spring and summer of 2001 from 150 wells in Arkansasin the Sparta-Memphis aquifer. Dissolved chloride samples were collected and analyzed for 87 of the 150 wells. Water-quality samples were not collected in Louisiana. Maps of areal distribution of potentiometric surface, difference in water-level measurements from 1997 to 2001, and specific conductance generated from these data reveal spatial trends across the study area. The highest water-level altitude measured in Arkansas was 328 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD of 1929) in Grant County; the lowest water-level altitudewas 197 feet below NGVD of 1929 in Union County. The highest water-level altitude measured in Louisiana was 235 feet above NGVD of 1929 in Bienville Parish; the lowest water-level altitude was 218 feet below NGVD of 1929 in Ouachita Parish.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Thomas Clay Dickerson

, * From the 39 th District Court

of Stonewall County,

Trial Court No. 1972

.

Vs. No. 11

- 18

- 00 268

- C R * October 30 , 20 20

The State of Texas

, * Memorand um Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.

, Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
#### Eugene T. Matthews, Respondent, v. Harry P. Emery, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 29, 1968, modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting from the sixth decretal paragraph the words “ and an additional allowance of 5% as provided in Section 8303 of the CPLR”. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent against appellant. In our opinion, under the circumstances herein, the granting of an additional allowance under CPLR 8303 (subd. [a], par. 3) was an improvident exercise of discretion. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
#### § 58.641 Hardening and storage.

Immediately after the semifrozen product is placed in its intended container it shall be placed in a hardening tunnel or hardening room to continue the freezing process. Rapid freezing to 0° to −15 °F is desirable to produce a good textured product.
EXHIBIT 10.10(8)


                               LETTER OF INTENT

REF:  LICENSE FOR ROCHEM SYSTEMS USED FOR GREY WATER, BLACK WATER, BILGE WATER
      AND BALLAST WATER FOR USE IN MARINE APPLICATIONS IN THE USA

Whereas, Rochem Environmental Inc. has been successful entering the US cruise
ship market and Rochem Group (Rochem) would like to give an incentive for REI to
pursue this market for Rochem grey water and black water treatment, as well as,
bilge and ballast water treatment ("the products").

Subject to a future definitive agreement, both REI and Rochem agree that it is
their mutual intent that:

      A.    Rochem will give an exclusive agency agreement to REI for "the
            products" for the marine shipping market, including naval
            applications. The agreement language will have safeguards to protect
            Rochem from nonperformance or insolvency.

      B.    Rochem Group will extend its loan of $500,000 which was due on 31
            December 1999 until 31 July 2001 at a reduced interest rate of
            10%/annum. Past interest to be paid at the execution of the final
            agreement(s). Ongoing interest will be paid on a quarterly basis.

      C.    Rochem will reimburse REI for the expenses it incurred in shipping
            materials for the installation of the Rochem systems aboard the
            Mercury (approx. $74.5k) and Galaxy (approx. $67.3k) within 14 days
            of signing this agreement. Rochem has already reimbursed $50k of
            these costs. Rochem and REI further agree to settle the labor
            expenses on pro rata share based on the amount recovered from the
            client for labor expenses.

      D.    REI will execute an agreement with Pall Corporation that will
            convert the existing accounts payable into a promissory note. The
            principal on the note will be due no earlier than 31 December 2002.

      E.    REI will return existing license to Pall in return for not less than
            90% of their shares. The returned shares will go to REI Treasury.

      F.    E. Neuman will continue to be employed by REI until the deliveries
            to the Celebrity vessels have been accepted and paid.

The initial term of this Letter of Intent shall be six (6) months unless
terminated earlier by mutual written agreement with both parties committed to
finalizing the agreements within the next 30 days.

Agreed to on this date 16 July 2000, by:

ROCHEM GROUP                                ROCHEM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.


By: /s/ HANS J. ROHRER                      By: /s/ ERICK. J. NEUMAN
        --------------------                        ----------------------
        Hans J. Rohrer                              Erick J. Neuman
        Director                                    President
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academic AchievementDisadvantaged YouthEducational ChangeEducational ImprovementElementary Secondary EducationEqual EducationMinority GroupsPovertyUrban Schools

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
# L_2014022EN.01004101.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 22/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 22/41

---

EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION

of 21 January 2014

appointing a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank

(2014/37/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 283(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 11.2 thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation of the Council of the European Union (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | By letter dated 17 December 2013, the President of the European Central Bank, Mr Mario DRAGHI, announced the decision of Mr Jörg ASMUSSEN to resign from his position on the Executive Board prior to the end of his term of office on 31 December 2019. His resignation took effect on 7 January 2014. It is therefore necessary to appoint a new member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By letter dated 17 December 2013, the President of the European Central Bank, Mr Mario DRAGHI, announced the decision of Mr Jörg ASMUSSEN to resign from his position on the Executive Board prior to the end of his term of office on 31 December 2019. His resignation took effect on 7 January 2014. It is therefore necessary to appoint a new member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank.

| (2) | The European Council wishes to appoint Ms Sabine LAUTENSCHLÄGER who, in its view, fulfils all the requirements set out in Article 283(2) of the Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The European Council wishes to appoint Ms Sabine LAUTENSCHLÄGER who, in its view, fulfils all the requirements set out in Article 283(2) of the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Sabine LAUTENSCHLÄGER is hereby appointed a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank for a term of office of eight years as from 27 January 2014.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 21 January 2014.

For the European Council

The President

H. VAN ROMPUY

---

(1)  
  OJ C 8, 11.1.2014, p. 1.

1

(2)  Opinion delivered on 16 January 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

2

(3)  Opinion delivered on 8 January 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

3

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Orazio, Jr., Appellant.

Motion granted, counsel relieved of assignment to conduct appeal and appeal dismissed. (See *People v Hutchings,*40 NY2d 836; *People v Sullivan,*28 NY2d 900.)
#### In the Matter of Elina Gutierrez, Petitioner, v Barbara Blum, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent State commissioner, dated March 21, 1978 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency to reduce petitioner’s public assistance in order to recoup overpayments in the amount of public assistance furnished to her during the time her husband was allegedly living in the household. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remanded to the respon*691dent State commissioner for a new hearing in accordance herewith. A full transcript of the fair hearing was not made and the State commissioner did not make her determination on the basis of a complete record. The hearing officer’s informal handwritten notes could not form the basis for a proper determination (see *Matter of Couball v Staszak,*70 AD2d 1027; *Ostrowski v City of New York,*601 F2d 629). In addition, petitioner’s alleged misconduct may not serve to deprive her minor children of the assistance they are entitled to receive, without a finding of lack of need (see *Matter of Farrone v Toia,*61 AD2d 983; *Matter of Gunn v Blum,*48 NY2d 58). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Cohalan and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER BRIEN SHARPE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20cv311-TKW-MJF

DIAZ,

Defendant.

__________________________/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 28). No objections were filed even though Plaintiff was 

given additional time to do so. See Doc. 30.

Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the case file, 

the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be 

dismissed because the second amended complaint fails to state a plausible Eighth 

Amendment claim against the defendant. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 5:20-cv-00311-TKW-MJF Document 31 Filed 04/11/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:22cv632-LC-HTC

2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§§1915A(b)(1) and 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

3. The Clerk shall close the case file.

DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of April, 2022.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00311-TKW-MJF Document 31 Filed 04/11/22 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mindray Medical International
Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors
and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
   June
27, 2008
 /s/ Joyce I-Yin HsuDirector and Chief Financial Officer
# 30.000 Scope of part.

This part describes policies and procedures for applying the Cost Accounting Standards Board (CASB) rules and regulations ( 48 CFR Chapter 99) to negotiated contracts and subcontracts. This part does not apply to sealed bid contracts or to any contract with a small business concern (see 48 CFR 9903.201-1(b) for these and other exemptions).

**Parent topic:**Part 30 - Cost Accounting Standards Administration
§ 51.887 Application of tolerances. The contents of the individual packages in any lot, based on sample inspection, are subject to the following limitations: *Provided,* That the averages for the entire lot are within the tolerances specified for the grade: ( a ) For tolerances of 10 percent or more, individual packages may contain not more than one and one-half times the specified tolerance.
( b ) For a tolerance of less than 10 percent, individual packages may contain not more than double the specified tolerance.
[36 FR 9126, May 20, 1971. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981. Redesignated at 56 FR 15802, Apr. 18, 1991]
#  

**The following Information Sheets require**Adobe Acrobat.
      -  Soil Quality Introduction 
      -  Soil Quality Resource Concerns:
      Erosion
Sediment Deposition on Cropland
Compaction
Salinization
Soil Biodiversity
Available Water Capacity
Pesticides
Hydrophobicity

      -  Indicators for Soil Quality Evaluation
      Organic Matter
Soil Crusts
Aggregate Stability
Infiltration
Soil pH

 

Rangeland Soil Quality Information Sheets are also   available.

**<  Return to Main Menu  >**
156 So.2d 603

#### Frank OLANO v. REX MILLING COMPANY and The Travelers Indemnity Company.

No. 46909.

Oct. 9, 1963.

In re: Frank Olano applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 154 So.2d 555.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.
§ 352.11 Mail. ( a ) *Transit mail.* ( 1 ) Plants, plant products, plant pests, biological control organisms, noxious weeds, soil, or other products or articles which arrive in the United States in closed dispatches by international mail or international parcel post and which are in transit through the United States to another country shall be allowed to move through the United States without further permit than the authorization contained in this section. Notice of arrival shall not be required as other documentation meets the requirement for this notice.
( 2 ) Inspectors ordinarily will not inspect transit mail or parcel post, whether transmitted in open mail or in closed dispatches. They may do so if it comes to their attention that any such mail or parcel post contains prohibited or restricted products or articles which require safeguard action. Inspection and disposal in such cases will be made in accordance with this part and part 330 of this chapter, and in conformity with regulations and procedures of the Post Office Department for handling transit mail and parcel post.
( b ) *Importation for exportation.* Plants and plant products to be imported for exportation, by mail, will be handled under permit in accordance with Part 351 of this chapter.
[25 FR 1929, Mar. 5, 1960, as amended at 75 FR 68952, Nov. 10, 2010; 84 FR 29966, June 25, 2019]
#### § 407.15 Area risk protection insurance for grain sorghum.

The grain sorghum crop insurance provisions for Area Risk Protection Insurance for the 2014 and succeeding crop years are as follows:

# UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

# Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

## Area Risk Protection Insurance

### Grain Sorghum Crop Insurance Provisions

### 1. Definitions

*Harvest.* Combining or threshing the sorghum for grain or cutting for hay, silage, or fodder.

*Planted acreage.* In addition to the definition contained in the Area Risk Protection Insurance Basic Provisions, sorghum seed broadcast and subsequently mechanically incorporated will not be considered planted.

### 2. Insured Crop

(a) The insured crop will be all sorghum excluding hybrid sorghum seed:

(1) Grown on insurable acreage in the county listed on the accepted application;

(2) Properly planted by the final planting date and reported on or before the acreage reporting date;

(3) Planted with the intent to be harvested; and

(4) Not planted into an established grass or legume or interplanted with another crop.

(b) Other sorghum including hybrid sorghum seed may be insurable under this policy if specified in the Special Provisions:

(1) The insurability requirements in 2(a) apply to these other sorghum and additional requirements for insurability may be stated for these crops in the Special Provisions; and

(2) This other sorghum will be insured using the yields, rates, and prices for sorghum unless otherwise specified in the actuarial documents.

### 3. Payment Dates

(a) Unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions the final county revenues and final county yields will be determined prior to April 16 following the crop year.

(b) If an indemnity is due, unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions we will issue any payment to you prior to May 16 following the crop year and following the determination of the final county revenue or the final county yield, as applicable.

### 4. Program Dates

| State and county | Cancellation and termination dates | Contract change date |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Val Verde, Edwards, Kerr, Kendall, Bexar, Wilson, Karnes, Goliad, Victoria, and Jackson Counties, Texas, and all Texas counties lying south thereof | January 31 | November 30. |
| El Paso, Hudspeth, Culberson, Reeves, Loving, Winkler, Ector, Upton, Reagan, Sterling, Coke, Tom Green, Concho, McCulloch, San Saba, Mills, Hamilton, Bosque, Johnson, Tarrant, Wise, and Cooke Counties, Texas, and all Texas counties south and east thereof to and including Terrell, Crockett, Sutton, Kimble, Gillespie, Blanco, Comal, Guadalupe, Gonzales, De Witt, Lavaca, Colorado, Wharton, and Matagorda Counties, Texas | February 15 | November 30. |
| Alabama; Arizona; Arkansas; California; Florida; Georgia; Louisiana; Mississippi; Nevada; North Carolina; and South Carolina | February 28 | November 30. |
| All other Texas counties and all other states | March 15 | November 30. |
#### § 51.1874 Serious damage.

*Serious damage* means any specific defect described in § 51.1877, table II; or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which seriously detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the tomato.
§ 51.344 Size. ( a ) The minimum and maximum sizes or range of sizes shall be determined as agreed upon by buyer and seller.
( b ) Unless otherwise specified, the minimum and maximum sizes or range of sizes shall be determined by the use of an approved sizing chain of the exact dimension specified in the agreement between buyer and seller.
( c ) Size is the dimension of the apples determined by the smallest opening through which it will pass.
32.009-2 Contract clause.

Insert clause 52.232-40, Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors, in all

solicitations and contracts.

Parent topic: 32.009 Providing accelerated payments to small business contractors and to prime

contractors that subcontract with a small business concern.
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
               HOME LOAN TRUST 2006-HI4 (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director