alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 56.61 Where to file an appeal. ( a ) *Appeal from resident grader's grading or decision in an official plant.* Any interested party who is not satisfied with the determination of the class, quality, quantity, or condition of product which was graded by a grader in an official plant and has not left such plant, and the operator of any official plant who is not satisfied with a decision by a grader on any other matter related to grading in such plant may request an appeal grading or review of the decision by the grader by filing such request with the grader's immediate supervisor.
( b ) *All other appeal requests.* Any interested party who is not satisfied with the determination of the class, quality, quantity, or condition of product which has left the official plant where it was graded or which was graded other than in an official plant may request an appeal grading by filing such request with the regional director in the area where the product is located or with the Chief of the Grading Branch.
[35 FR 9918, June 17, 1970. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 71 FR 42010, July 24, 2006]
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Case No. 3:20cr65-MCR

HILARIO SANTOS-HERNANDEZ

a/k/a SANTOS HERNANDEZ

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed.

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts One and Two of the

Indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was

knowing and voluntary and that the offenses charged are supported by independent

basesin fact containing each of the essential elementsthereof. I therefore recommend

that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and

have sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: November 13, 2020.

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr. 

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00065-MCR Document 27 Filed 11/30/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed

within twenty-four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different

deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use

only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the

magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a magistrate

judge'sfindings or recommendations contained in a report and recommendation

in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to

challenge on appealthe district court's order based on unobjected-to factual and

legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Case No. 3:20cr65-MCR

Case 3:20-cr-00065-MCR Document 27 Filed 11/30/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 4287.133 Sale of corporate stock.

Any sale or transfer of corporate stock must be approved by the Agency in writing and must be to an eligible individual or entity in accordance with § 4279.108(a) and 4279.108(b) of this chapter. In the event a portion of the borrower's stock is sold or transferred, the Agency may require personal or corporate guarantees from those then owning a 20 percent or more interest in the borrower in accordance with § 4279.132 of this chapter.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 5:91cr5008-WS

THOMAS LEE STEPHENS,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 241)

docketed September 1, 2011. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

motion for preservation of rights (doc. 240) be denied. The defendants has filed no

objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 241) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The defendant's motion for preservation of rights (doc. 240) is hereby

DENIED.

Case 5:91-cr-05008-WS-CAS Document 242 Filed 10/03/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of October , 2011.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 5:91cr5008-WS

Case 5:91-cr-05008-WS-CAS Document 242 Filed 10/03/11 Page 2 of 2
§ 51.1549 Skinning. ( a ) The following definitions provide a basis for describing lots of potatoes as to the degree of skinning whenever description may be appropriate: ( 1 ) “Practically no skinning” means that not more than 5 percent of the potatoes in the lot have more than one-tenth of the skin missing or “feathered”;
( 2 ) “Slightly skinned” means that not more than 10 percent of the potatoes in the lot have more than one-fourth of the skin missing or “feathered”;
( 3 ) “Moderately skinned” means that not more than 10 percent of the potatoes in the lot have more than one-half of the skin missing or “feathered”; and
( 4 ) “Badly skinned” means that more than 10 percent of the potatoes in the lot have more than one-half of the skin missing or “feathered”.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of The Saint James Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Bruce Cosgrove,  President,  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.




                                         /s/ Bruce Cosgrove
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Bruce Cosgrove, President, Chief
                                         Executive Officer & Chief Financial
                                         Officer

Dated: February 6, 2008
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<LEGEND>
                                                  EXHIBIT 27.1

                          FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                    COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
                        ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X

          This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Balance
Sheets of King World Productions, Inc. and its Subsidiaries and is quali-
fied in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                   <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000
<CURRENCY>                            U.S. DOLLARS
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         2nd QUARTER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     08/31
<PERIOD-START>                        12/01/96
<PERIOD-END>                          02/28/97
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                       1
<CASH>                                $300,045
<SECURITIES>                          $0
<RECEIVABLES>                         $75,424
<ALLOWANCES>                          $4,115
<INVENTORY>                           $0
<CURRENT ASSETS>                      $699,808
<PP&E>                                $20,661
<DEPRECIATION>                        $11,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        $900,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 $87,704
<BONDS>                               $0
<COMMON>                              $508
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 $0
<PREFERRED>                           $0
<OTHER-SE>                            $812,420
<PAGE 15>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          $900,124
<SALES>                               $0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      $175,169
<CGS>                                 $0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         $103,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      $21,254
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    $0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       $57,185
<INCOME-TAX>                          $20,508
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   $36,667
<DISCONTINUED>                        $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       $0
<CHANGES>                             $0
<NET-INCOME>                          $36,667
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         $0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                         $0.97


        

</TABLE>
LESAMUEL PALMER
,
Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3216

Opinion filed November 2, 2016.

Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Le S amuel Palmer, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for bel ated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall be allowed a belated

appeal from the December 17, 2015, order in Bradford County Circuit Court case

number 04

- 2012

- CF

- 000249

- A. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of

this opinion shall be provided to t he clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice

of appeal. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

OSTERHAUS, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

GUILLERMO CAMARILLORAZO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

3M COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 7:20cv00098-MCR-GRJ

AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT

Amended Final Judgment is entered nunc pro tunc to the date of the original 

judgment, November 16, 2021, in favor of the Plaintiff, GUILLERMO 

CAMARILLORAZO, and against Defendants, 3M COMPANY, 3M 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO 

INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC, and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, in 

the amount of One Hundred and Ninety-Two Thousand Dollars ($192,000.00) for 

past pain and suffering, Four Hundred and Eight Thousand Dollars ($408,000.00) 

for future pain and suffering, One Hundred and Ten Thousand Six Hundred and 

Forty-Five Dollars ($110,645.00) for future loss of earning capacity, One Hundred 

and Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($105,750.00) for future 

medical expenses, for a total of Eight Hundred and Sixteen Thousand Three Hundred 

Case 7:20-cv-00098-MCR-GRJ Document 191 Filed 01/12/23 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

and Ninety-Five Dollars ($816,395.00) in compensatory damages plus Seven 

Million Three Hundred and Forty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred and Fifty-Five 

Dollars ($7,347,555.00) in exemplary damages, for a total award of Eight Million 

One Hundred and Sixty-Three Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty Dollars 

($8,163,950.00), together with costs taxed against Defendants and post-judgment 

interest to be calculated from November 16, 2021, until the date the judgment is paid 

at a rate of 0.09 percent.

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS,

CLERK OF COURT

January 12, 2023 /s/Barbara Rogers

DATE Deputy Clerk: 

Case 7:20-cv-00098-MCR-GRJ Document 191 Filed 01/12/23 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rahmel Thompson, Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 539]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blackburne, J.), rendered May 22, 2003, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the prosecution improperly vouched for the veracity of two witnesses by inquiring upon direct examination into the terms of their cooperation agreements is unpreserved for appellate review, as he failed to object at trial to the challenged testimony *(see People v Clarke,*81 NY2d 777, 778 [1993]; *People v Burke,*72 NY2d 833, 835 [1988]; *People v Gibbs,*210 AD2d 4 [1994]; *People v Adams,*198 AD2d 422 [1993]), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The defendant was afforded meaningful representation *(see People v Satterfield,*66 NY2d 796, 798 [1985]).

The defendant’s remaining contention, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, is unpreserved for appellate review. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.
#### § 58.436 Rennet, pepsin, other milk clotting enzymes and flavor enzymes.

Enzyme preparations used in the manufacture of cheese shall be safe and suitable.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Kohlberg Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Michael I. Wirth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 28, 2010 |  | By: |  | /S/ MICHAEL I. WIRTH                                
|                   |  |     |  | Michael I. Wirth                                    
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer
|                   |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 58.515 Mixers.

Only mixers shall be used which will mix the cheese carefully and keep shattering of the curd particles to a minimum. They shall be constructed in such a manner as to be readily cleanable. If shafts extend through the wall of the tank below the level of the product, they shall be equipped with proper seals which are readily removable for cleaning and sanitizing. The mixer shall be enclosed or equipped with tight fitting covers.
#### § 51.633 Well colored.

*Well colored* means that the fruit is yellow in color with practically no trace of green color.
11.604 	Solicitation provision and contract clause.       (a)                    						            Contracting officers shall insert the provision at 52.211-14, Notice of Priority Rating for National Defense, Emergency Preparedness, and Energy Program Use, in solicitations when the contract to be awarded will be a rated order.                                          (b)                    						            Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 52.211-15, Defense Priority and Allocation Requirements, in contracts that are rated orders.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 11.6 - Priorities and Allocations
Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

RANDY A. HART, 

FDOC Inmate No. 075432, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5587/LAC/EMT 

S. DAVIS, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER

 The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on March 

30, 2021 (ECF No. 33). Efforts have been made to furnish a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation to Plaintiff and to afford him an opportunity to file objections 

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). All mail has been 

returned as undeliverable. No objections have been filed. 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 

 1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

33) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 
Page 2 of 2 

Case No.: 3:20cv5587/LAC/EMT 

 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(g). 

 3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. 

 4. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of July, 2021. 

 

 LACEY A. COLLIER 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 

s/L.A. Collier
#### § 58.155 Grading.

Dairy products which have been processed or manufactured in accordance with the provisions of this subpart may be graded by the grader in accordance with the U.S. Standards for Grades. Laboratory analyses, when required in determining the final grade shall be conducted in an approved laboratory.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties VII Limited Partnership Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000758009
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES VII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             816
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      242
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          22,346
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,386)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         10,780
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,210
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,001
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,446
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       555
<EPS-BASIC>                                      31.66<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 58.2825 United States Standard for ice cream. ( a ) Ice cream shall contain at least 1.6 pounds of total solids to the gallon, weigh not less than 4.5 pounds to the gallon, and contain not less than 20 percent total milk solids, constitued of not less than 10 percent milkfat. In no case shall the content of milk solids not fat be less than 6 percent. Whey shall not, by weight, be more than 25 percent of the milk solids not fat.
( b ) When one or more of the bulky optional ingredients, as approved by the Food and Drug Administration, are used, the weights of milk fat and total milk solids (excusive of such fat and solids in any malted milk used) are not less than 10 percent and 20 percent, respectively, of the remainder obtained by subtracting the weight of such optional ingredients, from the weight of the finished ice cream; but in no case is the weight of milk fat or total milk solids less than 8 percent and 16 percent, respectively, of the weight of the finished ice cream. In calculating the reduction of milk fat and total milk solids from the use of bulky optional ingredients, chocolate and cocoa solids used shall be considered the bulky ingredients. In order to make allowance for additional sweetening ingredients needed when bulky ingredients are used, the weight of chocolate or cocoa solids may be multiplied by 2.5; the weight of fruit or nuts used may be multiplied by 1.4; and the weight of partially or wholly dried fruits or fruit juices may be multiplied by appropriate factors to obtain the original weights before drying and this weight multiplied by 1.4 The finished ice cream contains not less than 1.6 pounds to the gallon; except that when the optional ingredient microcrystalline cellulose is used, the finished ice cream contains not less than 1.6 pounds of total solids to the gallon and weighs not less than 4.5 pounds to the gallon exclusive, in both cases, of the weight of the microcrystalline cellulose.
( c ) Optional characterizing ingredients, optional sweetening ingredients, stabilizers, and emulsifiers as approved by the Food and Drug Administration may be used.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Rodriguez, Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 538]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered November 20, 2003, convicting him of criminal contempt in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.