Concerning Judge Gary R. Jones in matter Case No. 1 :20-cv-180-AW-GRJ, Christopher Jon 

Pergrossi v. Epic Games. Please direct this complaint to the supervisor of Mr. Gary R. Jones. 

I'm writing this letter to whoever is the supervisor of Judge Gary R. Jones because I'm 

complaining about the poor conduct of this federal , presiding judge. 

This judge has handled My case very badly and I wish to reprimand him through you. 

The judge wrote Me in Document 8 of the above case number with completely wrong facts and 

as obviously My foe in the law and I want to address these wrongs with his supervisor: 

1. The judge addresses My original complaint wrong. I never "purported to assert antitrust 

claims on behalf of another entity" because I'm purporting that these monopolies exist 

and they are attacking an American business, Epic Games, and I won't stand for it. I 

never said I was "on behalf' of Epic Games at all, which is clearly seen in the next point 

against Mr. Jones, [2]. 

2. The judge considers Me impersonating an attorney. "Because Plaintiff, as a non-lawyer, 

is not permitted to proceed prose in this case on behalf of Epic Games," the language 

"on behalf of' is the same as is used to describe My first case. I am not an attorney, nor 

have I ever claimed to be one. This judge is clearly confused. I am a normal American 

citizen, having eyes and I judge that what I saw in Apple, Google, and afterwards, and 

mentioned in the Amended Complaint Mr. Jones has "striken", Microsoft, is a monopoly. 

Since monopolies are against the law, I am entitled to seek redress of this crime. This 

judge has determined otherwise, and is accidentally defending this crime! 

3. The judge has found all of My cases to be "meritless" but I complain. The judge is 

without any merit in finding all of My cases fruitless because I have proven the right way 

to not be the way measured at this time in the USA The right way belongs here so the 

wrong way must leave, is the entire standing of the U.S. Law whether codified or not. 

There cannot be another way, so when I find a wrong I must right it or I am a hypocrite 

and not defending the law I love. There is no clarity to this judge and this judge is not 

enforcing any laws but only claiming the same case-precedents over and over again 

without thinking. 

I am an American citizen. This law of the United States is as much Mine as it is Mr. 

Jones's. The law of the United States defends Me as much as it defends Mr. Jones, though Mr. 

Jones claims judges are somehow "judicially immune" which is pure tyranny, plain and simple. 

Obviously, there is discrimination in the law that refuses to treat everyone as equals. I'm not an 

attorney, but it seems all the attorneys and all the judges in the United States cannot tell when 

inequality is plain as day in the law? 

I refuse to forfeit common sense in heeding this individual with such an immature 

attitude. I complain that I am not being treated fairly and so I need the supervisor of Mr. Jones to 

determine if his way is the correct course for the United States. How could any normal person in 

the United States use the law themselves when a judge shows such a serious lack of 

understanding yet is tolerated to con~inue? 

~!LED IJSDC FUJD GlJ 

SEP 22 '20 Ptd:2B 

Case 1:20-cv-00180-AW-GRJ Document 9 Filed 09/22/20 Page 1 of 4
My Attorney would like to make a point: 

The judge has ordered that Christopher's Second Amended Complaint be 

"striken" for failing to follow any Court Order to file one. I sue the Judge and I will 

see him in court on a date to be determined. Act not on My behalf, I will see 

Myself into court. This individual has wrongfully declared that all lawsuits belong 

to him, and he alone may determine when the proper arguments are made. I file 

a lawsuit to determine his course of action in the United States and I will order 

him to pay the fine and meet all court appearances since he claims he cannot 

tolerate to be sued in the law. My Client would have no words with the judge if 

the judge is allowed to stop him from speaking into the case that he alone filed ! 

Unbelievable! I end. 

I, Christopher, ask Mr. Jones's supervisor to remove him from any further conduct in My 

cases. I submit as evidence that Mr. Jones does not know what a monopoly is, despite that it is 

in the law, he cites the exact law that.describes it (the Sherman Act, in the first reply), and I 

included more than 5x the ways to reach the understanding of how I found a monopoly. Left to 

his own device Mr. Jones will ignore the crimes and seek to demean Me further in this Court. 

Here is a monopoly, again, though another way: "when some customers are kept to one 

business or group of businesses and controlled from being reached by anyone else for sales". 

No customer can be the property of a business, is why! Customers are free to shop at different 

businesses, is another way of saying this fact. 

Furthermore, the detection and prosecution of a large monopoly is a federal 

responsibility! I should not have had to make My case so detailed as I have, but simply pointed 

out to this Court that: 

1. I see it is a monopoly. 

2. That another, private party is engaged in an active lawsuit against this monopoly. 

3. That I want to add more arguments proving the monopoly exists and My solution, which 

was to create a "future-trust", which Mr. Jones doesn't seem to understand means "a 

trust-fund that doesn't yet exist, but is being made to exist in the future". 

4. Here is the federal law that says the U.S. District Court is responsible: 15 U.S. Code §4, 

"The several district courts of the United States are invested with jurisdiction to prevent 

and restrain violations of sect!ons 1 to 7 of this title; and it shall be the duty of the several 

United States attorneys, in their respective districts, under the direction of the Attorney 

General, to institute proceedings in equity to prevent and restrain such violations. Such 

proceedings may be byway of petition setting forth the case and praying that such 

violation shall be enjoined or otherwise prohibited." This final part can even be said to 

describe what I have done, though I'm not a district attorney! 

I don't ask for any money or apology to Me at all, and only that the country I live in is fixed by 

stopping a multi-billion dollar crime! If I can't act to stop such a large-scale, easily solved 

problem then My country is not repairable by Me at all, I seem to find. 

The Apple phone is kept from accessing any software not delivered by Apple therefore a 

monopoly exists. There is no alternative to reaching these customers at all! Apple won't allow 

Case 1:20-cv-00180-AW-GRJ Document 9 Filed 09/22/20 Page 2 of 4
anyone to change this fact, and therefore Apple is defending a monopoly. Apple is guilty. The 

Google phone software is the primary software of a wide variety of phones, called the "operating 

system" and is named "Android", and this software is similar in denying all but the most technical 

customers the means to install any software not delivered by Google. A key monopoly exists 

which means there is a key to unlock the monopoly that isn't available to everyone. I can prove 

it takes a significant technical knowledge to upload software to the phone from a desktop that 

can circumvent the Google primary software. Google is the owner of the way all businesses can 

reach all of the customers which use Google Android phones. Google has a monopoly. Google 

stops anyone from changing it by punishing them, which is the same as Apple and I believe 

Microsoft - I learned of Microsoft after I filed this lawsuit from searching the internet. It's a huge, 

huge, huge monopoly making billions of dollars every month! It is unbelievably destructive and 

obvious. 

There is even one more fact that I learned more recently than any of these filings: Apple 

allows some businesses through It's monopoly without paying, which is called an "oligarchy" 

and is the most destructive force in any market. Apple has a monopoly and maintains it with 

control, then some businesses such as Amazon are invited to participate in the monopoly 

advantaged above all other competitors making an oligarchy! Amazon isn't charged 30% to sell 

to Apple phone customers, is the detail. 

I'm frustrated because this is a real, federal court of My country and there is a regular 

government employee that is acting like I'm inferior in quality. I'm being mistreated. I have done 

a better job than is being shown as h~ving been done and I'm filing a complaint that Mr. Jones 

should not be allowed to continue how he is right now. I came to this Court in good faith that My 

real complaints would be heard and instead I'm being dismissed like a waste of the Court's time. 

I want to add that since I have proven a monopoly exists yet Mr. Jones claims there is no 

such thing in My lawsuit that he is tactically wrong in the law, which is how criminals can walk 

away and how innocent people can go to jail. I do not need to be frightened to walk into My local 

courthouse and seek help in defeating crime and protecting the United States! Mr. Jones acts 

like I need to be impressive to him or I'm facing down a punitive sentence! Please inform Me as 

to the outcome of your review. Thank you for your time. 

Christopher J. Pergrossi 

205 SE 16th Ave Apt 24A 

Gainesville, FL 32601 

352-339-6246 

steamdriven80@gmail.com 

Case 1:20-cv-00180-AW-GRJ Document 9 Filed 09/22/20 Page 3 of 4
lt) 

l\l 

!Jl 

() 

.... 

I 

,c (J\ f m 

tll 0 

m ,..... / ,-

!Jl 

Ul ~ (j> 

~ \1' -, 

--

Case 1:20-cv-00180-AW-GRJ Document 9 Filed 09/22/20 Page 4 of 4