alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 51.2077 U.S. No. 2.

“U.S. No. 2” consists of almonds in the shell which meet the requirements of U.S. No. 1 grade, except that an additional tolerance of 20 percent shall be allowed for almonds with shells damaged by discoloration.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Citizenship EducationCivicsInstructional MaterialsLaw Related EducationMiddle SchoolsSocial Studies

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
§ 301.87-7 Assembly and inspection of regulated articles. ( a ) Any person (other than a person authorized to issue certificates or limited permits under § 301.87-5(c)) who desires to move interstate a regulated article accompanied by a certificate or limited permit shall, as far in advance as possible (should be no less than 48 hours before the desired movement), request an inspector[1] to take any necessary action under this subpart prior to movement of the regulated article.
( b ) The regulated article shall be assembled at whatever point and in whatever manner the inspector designates as necessary to comply with the requirements of this subpart.
[48 FR 50059, Oct. 31, 1983, as amended at 59 FR 67609, Dec. 30, 1994; 87 FR 80016, Dec. 29, 2022] Footnotes -
301.87-7
[1] Inspectors are assigned to local offices of Plant Protection and Quarantine, which are listed in telephone directories. Information concerning local offices may also be obtained from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Domestic and Emergency Operations, 4700 River Road Unit 134, Riverdale, Maryland 20737-1236.
#### State Division of Human Rights, on the Complaint of Martin Gonzalez, Petitioner, v Central Buffalo Project Corporation, Respondents.

Order of appeal board unanimously confirmed and petition denied, without costs. (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present— Hancock, Jr., J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
#### § 500.24 Fee Schedule.

| Event by category | Fee\* | Unit | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| USNA Terrace | $12,000 | Per Day | Up to 240 seated or 300 standing. |
| USNA Herb Garden | 10,000 | Per Day | Entrance Circle, Rose and Knot Garden: Up to 48 seated or 100 standing; cannot be tented. Specialty Garden: Up to 200 standing; may not be tented. |
| USNA Meadow | 15,000 | Per Day | Up to 600 seated or 1000 standing. |
| USNA Administration Building Lobby | 2,000 | Per Day | Up to 150 standing. |
| USNA Auditorium | 2,500 | Per Day | Up to 120 seated or 200 standing. |
| Friendship Garden | 1,500 | Per Day | Up to 60 seated or 100 standing. |
| National Capitol Columns | 10,000 | Per Day | Up to 190 seated or 400 standing; cannot be tented; includes night lighting of columns. |
| Bonsai Museum International, Pavilion and Upper Courtyard | 10,000 | Per Day | Up to 120 seated or 200 standing. |
| Bonsai Museum Chinese Pavilion | 10,000 | Per Day | Up to 50 seated or 100 standing. |
| Dogwood Collection Allee & Circle | 3,000 | Per Day | Up to maximum of 150 people at event; reserved for marriage ceremonies and accompanying receptions only. |
| M Street Picnic Area | 5,000 | Per Day | Up to 200 seated or standing; paved or grassy areas can be tented. |
| Classroom | 125 50 | Per Day Per Half Day | Standard set-up with 40 chairs; includes microphone/lectern, screen, projection stand, two flip charts (no paper), and trashcan. |
| Still Photography: | | | |
| Individual | No Charge | | For personal use only; includes hand-held cameras, recorders and tripods. |
| Other | $30 $250 plus Supervision | Application Fee Per Half Day | All photography that use models, sets or props that are not part of the site's natural or cultural resources or administrative facilities; or take place where members of the public are generally not allowed; or take place at a location where additional administrative costs are likely. |
| Cinematography: | | | |
| Set Preparation | $30 $250 plus Supervision | Application Fee Per Whole Day. | Set up; no filming. |
| Filming | $1,500 to $3,900 | Per Whole Day | Sliding scale based on number of people in cast and crew and number of pieces of equipment from 45 people and 6 pieces of equipment = $1,500 to 200 people = $3,900; 5 people with carry on equipment = same as still photography. |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| \* Fees include only access to sites; additional security charges may be necessary depending upon the site and the number of people participating. | | | |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carmen Battaglia, Appellant.

Judgment insofar as it imposes sentence unanimously reversed, sentence vacated and matter remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings (see *People v Gendron,*71 AD2d 1050; *People v Jones,*70 AD2d 1054). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court— grand larceny, third degree.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Moule, JJ.
27.405-2 Existing works.

The clause at 52.227-18, Rights in Data-Existing Works, is for use in contracts exclusively for the

acquisition (without modification) of existing works such as, motion pictures, television recordings,

and other audiovisual works; sound recordings; musical, dramatic, and literary works; pantomimes

and choreographic works; pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works; and works of a similar nature.

The contract may set forth limitations consistent with the purposes for which the works covered by

the contract are being acquired. Examples of these limitations are means of exhibition or

transmission, time, type of audience, and geographical location. However, if the contract requires

that works of the type indicated in this paragraph are to be modified through editing, translation, or

addition of subject matter, etc. (rather than purchased in existing form), then see 27.405-1.

Parent topic: 27.405 Other data rights provisions.
#### § 51.624 U.S. Combination.

“U.S. Combination” consists of a combination of U.S. No. 1 and U.S. No. 2 grapefruit: *Provided,* That at least 55 percent, by count, meet the requirements of U.S. No. 1 grade for defects, *And provided further,* That the lot meets the basic requirement for discoloration as specified in the U.S. No. 2 grade. For tolerances see § 51.628.

[85 FR 68423, Oct. 29, 2020]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0623 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRANDON JEROME LAMBRIGHT,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 6, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 28 2022

11/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0623
22.403-3 Contract Work Hours and Safety

Standards.

40 U.S.C.chpater 37, Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards, requires that certain contracts

(see 22.305) contain a clause (see 52.222-4) specifying that no laborer or mechanic doing any part of

the work contemplated by the contract shall be required or permitted to work more than 40 hours in

any workweek unless paid for all additional hours at not less than 1 1/2 times the basic rate of pay

(see 22.301).

Parent topic: 22.403 Statutory, Executive Order, and regulatory requirements.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Isaac Rosenbloom et al., Respondent-Appellant, v Robert Z. Srogi, as Commissioner of Assessment of the City of Syracuse, Appellant-Respondent. In the Matter of Beahel, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v Robert Z. Srogi, as Commissioner of Assessment of the City of Syracuse, Appellant-Respondent.

Orders and judgment unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to petitioner, in accordance with same memorandum as in *Matter of Rosenbloom v*Srogi, (75 AD2d 719). (Appeals from orders and judgment of Onondaga Supreme Court —Real Property Tax Law, art 7.) Present—Simons, J. P., Schnepp, Callahan and Witmer, JJ.
28.101-1 Policy on use.       (a) 						            A contracting officer shall not require a bid guarantee unless a performance bond or a performance and payment bond is also required (see 28.102 and 28.103). Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this subsection, bid guarantees shall be required whenever a performance bond or a performance and payment bond is required.                                          (b) 						            All types of bid guarantees are acceptable for supply or service contracts (see annual bid bonds and annual performance bonds coverage in 28.001). Only separate bid guarantees are acceptable in connection with construction contracts. Agencies may specify that only separate bid bonds are acceptable in connection with construction contracts.                                          (c) 						            The chief of the contracting office may waive the requirement to obtain a bid guarantee when a performance bond or a performance and payment bond is required if it is determined that a bid guarantee is not in the best interest of the Government for a specific acquisition (*e.g.,* overseas construction, emergency acquisitions, sole-source contracts). Class waivers may be authorized by the agency head or designee.    **Parent topic:** 28.101 Bid guarantees.
Exhibit 32.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Furia
Organization, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer and principal
financial and accounting officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of The Furia
Organization, Inc.

Dated: November 14, 2005

                                  -------------------------------
                                  Michael D. Alexander
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  and principal financial and accounting officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2579 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2579

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain leather basketballs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 6, 2006

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain leather basketballs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN LEATHER BASKETBALLS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.95.08       Basketballs,       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         having an                                                          31/2009
                         external surface
                         of leather
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         9506.62.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
25.1103 Other provisions and clauses.       (a)                   *Restrictions on certain foreign purchases*. Insert the clause at 52.225-13, Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases, in solicitations and contracts, unless an exception applies.                                          (b)                   *Translations*. Insert the clause at 52.225-14, Inconsistency Between English Version and Translation of Contract, in solicitations and contracts if anticipating translation into another language.                                          (c)                   *Foreign currency offers*. Insert the provision at 52.225-17, Evaluation of Foreign Currency Offers, in solicitations that permit the use of other than a specified currency. Insert in the provision the source of the rate to be used in the evaluation of offers.                                          (d)                   The contracting officer shall include in each solicitation for the acquisition of other than commercial products or commercial services the provision at 52.225-20, Prohibition on Conducting Restricted Business Operations in Sudan—Certification.                                          (e) The contracting officer shall include in all solicitations the provision at 52.225-25, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain Activities or Transactions Relating to Iran-Representation and Certifications.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 25.11 - Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses
```

[107th Congress Public Law 223]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ223.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 1338]]

Public Law 107-223
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to issue right-of-way permits 
 for natural gas pipelines within the boundary of Great Smoky Mountains 
         National Park. <<NOTE: Aug. 21, 2002 -  [H.R. 3380]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 16 USC 403 note.>> PERMITS FOR EXISTING NATURAL GAS 
            PIPELINES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior may issue right-of-
way permits for natural gas pipelines that exist as of September 1, 
2001, within the boundary of Great Smoky Mountains National Park.
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--A permit issued under subsection (a) 
shall be--
            (1) issued consistent with laws and regulations generally 
        applicable to utility rights-of-way within units of the National 
        Park System; and
            (2) subject to any terms and conditions that the Secretary 
        deems necessary.

SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 16 USC 403 note.>> PERMITS FOR PROPOSED NATURAL GAS 
            PIPELINES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior may issue right-of-
way permits for natural gas pipelines within the boundary of Great Smoky 
Mountains National Park that are proposed to be constructed across the 
following:
            (1) The Foothills Parkway.
            (2) The Foothills Parkway Spur between Pigeon Forge and 
        Gatlinburg.
            (3) The Gatlinburg Bypass.

    (b) Terms and Conditions.--A permit issued under subsection (a) 
shall be--
            (1) issued consistent with laws and regulations generally 
        applicable to utility rights-of-way within units of the National 
        Park System; and
            (2) subject to any terms and conditions that the Secretary 
        deems necessary, including--
                    (A) provisions for the protection and restoration of 
                park resources that are disturbed by pipeline 
                construction; and

[[Page 116 STAT. 1339]]

                    (B) assurances that construction and operation of 
                the pipeline will not adversely affect Great Smoky 
                Mountains National Park.

    Approved August 21, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3380 (S. 1097):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107-491 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 107-72 accompanying S. 1097 (Comm. on Energy and 
Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            July 8, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 10.27







AMENDMENT NO. 2
 TO
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 
 This Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement, dated April 1, 2006, as amended on December 22, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”), by and between Walco International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Damian Olthoff
(the “Executive”) is entered into as of the 3rd day of September, 2009 (“Effective Date”).
 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend certain terms of the Employment Agreement as set forth herein;
 
 NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
 
 1.           Capitalized Terms.  All capitalized terms used, but not defined herein, shall have the same meaning as prescribed in the Employment Agreement.
 
 2.           Termination following Change of Control Occurring Prior to January 1, 2011.  In the event (i) of a Change of Control prior to January 1, 2011, and
(ii) within the two (2) years following such Change of Control, the Executive’s employment terminates pursuant to either Section 5.4 or 5.5 of the Agreement; then the Separation Pay Period or payment period specified in Section 5.5 (as applicable) shall be increased to include an additional six (6) months.
 
 3.           Entire Agreement.  This Amendment constitutes the sole and entire agreement of the parties with respect to the second amendment of the Agreement;
supersedes all prior verbal and written understandings and agreements between the parties relating to its subject matters; and may not be modified except in a writing signed by both parties.
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.
 
  EXECUTIVE
WALCO INTERNATIONAL, INC./s/ Damian Olthoff

Damian Olthoff
By: /s/ James C. Robison

Name:  James C. Robison
Title:  President and C.E.O.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case Nos.: 5:95cr5016/LAC/EMT

5:16cv264/LAC/EMT

JAMES KEITH JOHNSON

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s

Report and Recommendation dated April 5, 2017 (ECF No. 190). The parties

have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed

objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections

thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2

2. Government’s “Motion to Dismiss Defendant’s Second and Successive

Motion to Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255” (ECF No. 187) is GRANTED.

3. Defendant’s “Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or

Correct Sentence” (ECF NO. 183) is summarily DENIED and DISMISSED.

4. Defendant’s Motion to DenyGovernment’s Motion to Dismiss(ECFNo.

188) is DENIED.

5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21 day of April, 2017.

st

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 5:95cr5016/LAC/EMT; 5:16cv264/LAC/EMT
#### Peter J. Corines, Appellant, v Sentry Life Insurance Co. et al., Respondents.

Submitted July 2, 2007;

decided September 18, 2007

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against United States Life Insurance Company and Continental Casualty Company, denied; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Sentry Life Insurance Company, dismissed as untimely. The prior application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, made at the Appellate Division, insofar as against Sentry Life Insurance Company, was untimely *(see*Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 12:3, at 436-437 [rev 3d ed 2005]).
§ 56.28 Types of service. ( a ) *Noncontinuous grading service.* Service is performed on an unscheduled basis, with no scheduled tour of duty, and when an applicant requests grading of a particular lot of shell eggs. Charges or fees are based on the time, travel, and expenses needed to perform the work. This service may be referred to as unscheduled grading service. Shell eggs graded under unscheduled grading service are not eligible to be identified with the official grademarks shown in § 56.36.
( b ) *Continuous grading service on a scheduled basis.* Service on a scheduled basis has a scheduled tour of duty and is performed when an applicant requests that a USDA licensed grader be stationed in the applicant's processing plant and grade shell eggs in accordance with U.S. Standards. The applicant agrees to comply with the facility, operating, and sanitary requirements of scheduled service. Minimum fees for service performed under a scheduled agreement will be based on the hours of the regular tour of duty. Shell eggs graded under scheduled grading service are eligible to be identified with the official grademarks shown in § 56.36 only when processed and graded under the supervision of a grader or quality assurance inspector as provided in § 56.39.
( c ) *Temporary grading service.* Service is performed when an applicant requests an official plant number with service provided on an unscheduled basis. The applicant must meet all facility, operating, and sanitary requirements of continuous service. Charges or fees are based on the time and expenses needed to perform the work. Shell eggs graded under temporary grading service are eligible to be identified with the official grademarks only when they are processed and graded under the supervision of a grader or quality assurance inspector as provided in § 56.39.
[84 FR 49642, Sept. 23, 2019]
#### In re COHN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 12, 1906.)

In the matter of Charles Cohn.

No opinion. Reference ordered. Settle order on notice.