alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket No: FAA-2015-3633 Dir ID: 2014-NM-097-AD

FAA MCAI AD WORKSHEET (CONTINUED)

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 5/7/14

Regional Airline Association 5/7/14

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 5/7/14

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 5/7/14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties VII Limited Partnership 1997 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000758009
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES VII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             709
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       22
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          21,092
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         11,159
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,609
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,793
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,729
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 678
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        64
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.65<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
52.203-17 Contractor Employee

Whistleblower Rights.

As prescribed in 3.906 , insert the following clause:

Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights (Nov 2023)

(a) This contract and employees working on this contract will be subject to the whistleblower rights

and remedies established at 41 U.S.C. 4712 and Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 3.900 through

3.905.

(b) The Contractor shall inform its employees in writing, in the predominant language of the

workforce, of employee whistleblower rights and protections under 41 U.S.C. 4712, as described in

FAR 3.900 through 3.905.

(c) The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all

subcontracts.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.203 [Reserved]
`IndymacBank

                       REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance


I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. the servicer for the
transactions listed on the attached schedule and I certify:

a)    A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of
      its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
      under my supervision.

b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, IndyMac Bank has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the agreement in all material
      respects throughout the reporting period.

                                                 By:      /s/ Robert M. Abramian
                                                      --------------------------
                                                          Robert M. Abramian
                                                          First Vice President
                                                          Home Loans Servicing
                                                          Investor Reporting
                                                          Indymac Bank

                                                 By:      /s/ Bart Vincent
                                                      --------------------------
                                                          Bart Vincent
                                                          Senior Vice President
                                                          HLS-Finance
                                                          Financial
                                                          Indymac Bank

Prepared for:     Aurora Loan Services

Date:             February 28, 2007

Ref:              EXHIBIT A


                                                             www.indymacbank.com

460 Sierra Madre Villa Ave., Pasadena, CA 91107                 Tel: 626.535.555`

---

`EXHIBIT A

    137    LXS 2006-12N LB 7/27/06
    139    LXS 2006-11 7/27/06
    140    LMT 2006-4 7/28/06
    187    ITF SARM 2006-8 (LB) 8/31/06
    188    LXS 2006-14N (LB) 8/31/06
    193    ITF LXS 2006-13 8/31/06
    234    ITF SARM 2006-4 04/28/06
    238    LXS 2006-7 04/28/06
    276    ITF LXS 2006-8 05/31/06
    286    ITF LXS 2006-10N (6-30-06)
    294    LMT 2006-5 8-31-06
    374    ITF LXS 2006-16N 092906
    377    ITF LXS 2006-15 092906
    433    LMT 2006-6 09/29/06
    441    ITF LXS 2008-17 10/30/06
    443    LMT 2006-7 10/30/06
    447    LXS 2006-18N 11/29/2006
    448    LXS 2006-19 11/29/2006
    449    LMT 2006-8 11/29/2006
    903    ITF LXS 2006-2N 1/31/06
   4108    LMT 2006-9 12/12/06
   4109    LXS 2006-20 12/29/06`
(86 Misc. Rep. 42)

#### CONOLLY et al. v. JOLLY et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 18, 1914.)

Courts (§ 189*)—Municipal Court—Setting Aside Judgment—Motion.

Under Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, c. 580) § 254, providing that a motion to set aside a verdict as contrary to the evidence or the law may be made at the close of the trial or within five days from judgment thereon upon notice, there is no authority for a second motion or an order thereon after one motion to set aside the verdict has been made and decided.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. §§ 409, 412, 413, 429, 458; Dec. Dig. § 189.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District.

Action by Mary A. Conolly and others, as executors of Catherine Conolly, deceased, against Leon G. Jolly and others, doing business under the name of C. Jolly & Son. From an order setting aside a verdict in her favor, defendant Thulstrup appeals.

Reversed, and verdict and judgment reinstated.

Argued June term, 1914, before SEABURY, BIJUR, and PAGE, JJ.

Leo Fassler, of New York City, for appellant.

Churchill & Marlow, of New York City, for respondents.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexer

BIJUR, J.

The verdict was set aside, apparently as against the weight of evidence. While in this respect we would naturally hesitate to disturb the view of the trial judge, nevertheless it must be said that the record does not disclose any salient reason for setting aside the conclusion arrived at by the jury.

The order must, however, be reversed for a different reason. The record shows that, after the jury had rendered its verdict, defendant made the usual motion to.set it aside, and the court said:

> “I will not at this time disturb the verdict. Motion denied for the present.”

*181Subsequently, on affidavits, a new motion to the same effect was made by the plaintiff, and the order appealed from was made upon that motion. I can find no authority for a second motion under section 254 of the Municipal Court Act, after one- motion to „ set aside the verdict has been made and decided. On the contrary, the very plain intimation of the cases in which this point or analogous ones have been considered is to the contrary. See, for example, Stodder v. N. E. N. Co., 134 App. Div. 221, 118 N. Y. Supp. 844; Colwell v. N. Y. R. R. Co., 57 Misc. Rep. 623, 108 N. Y. Supp. 540; Steinman v. Blumenfeld, 61 Misc. Rep. 220, 113 N. Y. Supp. 550.

Order reversed, and verdict and judgment reinstated, with costs of the appeal to appellant. All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF YAGER KUESTER PUBLIC FUND 1986 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          92,544
<SECURITIES>                                   267,629
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               405,422
<PP&E>                                       8,638,497
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,482,902
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,633,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,986,965
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,633,602
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,178,129
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  803,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             426,557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    51,497
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Subpart 4.15 - [Reserved]

Parent topic: Part 4 - Administrative and Information Matters

4.1500 [Reserved]

4.1501 [Reserved]

4.1502 [Reserved]
52.208-6 Marking of Leased Vehicles.

As prescribed in 8.1104(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for leasing

motor vehicles, unless the motor vehicles are leased in foreign countries:

Marking of Leased Vehicles (Apr 1984)

(a) The Government may place nonpermanent markings or decals, identifying the using agency, on

each side, and on the front and rear bumpers, of any motor vehicle leased under this contract. The

Government shall use markings or decals that are removable without damage to the vehicle.

(b) The Contractor may use placards for temporary identification of vehicles except that the placards

may not contain any references to the Contractor that may be construed as advertising or

endorsement by the Government of the Contractor.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.208 [Reserved]
25.301-4 Contract clause.       Insert the clause at 52.225-19, Contractor	Personnel in a Designated Operational Area or Supporting a Diplomatic	or Consular Mission outside the United States, in solicitations	and contracts, other than personal service contracts with individuals,	that will require contractor personnel to perform outside the United	States—                                       (a) 						            In	a designated operational area during–                                                         (1) 								                Contingency	operations;                                                            (2) 								                Humanitarian	or peacekeeping operations; or                                                            (3) 								                Other military	operations or military exercises, when designated by the combatant	commander; or                                                                             (b) 						            When supporting	a diplomatic or consular mission–                                                         (1) 								                That has been	designated by the Department of State as a danger pay post (see https://aoprals.state.gov/); or                                                            (2) 								                That the	contracting officer determines is a post at which application of	the clause FAR 52.225-19,	Contractor Personnel in a Designated Operational Area or Supporting	a Diplomatic or Consular Mission outside the United States, is appropriate.    **Parent topic:** 25.301 Contractor personnel in a designated operational area or supporting a diplomatic or consular mission outside the United States.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of BioFuel Energy, Corp. (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott H. Pearce, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





March 29, 2011





/s/ Scott PearceScott H. PearcePresident and Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CURTIS ALEXANDER MOHAMMED,

D.O.C. # T58564,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:19cv465–WS/MAF

SGT. CASSANDRA CACCIMUS,

Defendant.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 4) docketed March 23, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that this case

be dismissed without prejudice for the plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and to

comply with a court order. The plaintiff has filed no objections to the report and

recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the

recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 4) is adopted

Case 4:19-cv-00465-WS-MAF Document 6 Filed 04/30/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. Petitioner’s complaint and this action are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and to prosecute the case. 

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are DISMISSED

without prejudice."

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of April , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:19-cv-00465-WS-MAF Document 6 Filed 04/30/20 Page 2 of 2
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Curriculum DevelopmentFamily LiteracyFamily ProgramsLiteracy EducationParent EducationParent ParticipationPreschool EducationProgram EvaluationUrban SchoolsUrban Youth

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Case 7:20-cv-00134-MCR-GRJ Document 163 Filed 04/29/22 Page 1 of 13
Case 7:20-cv-00134-MCR-GRJ Document 163 Filed 04/29/22 Page 2 of 13
Case 7:20-cv-00134-MCR-GRJ Document 163 Filed 04/29/22 Page 3 of 13
Case 7:20-cv-00134-MCR-GRJ Document 163 Filed 04/29/22 Page 4 of 13
Case 7:20-cv-00134-MCR-GRJ Document 163 Filed 04/29/22 Page 5 of 13
Case 7:20-cv-00134-MCR-GRJ Document 163 Filed 04/29/22 Page 6 of 13
Case 7:20-cv-00134-MCR-GRJ Document 163 Filed 04/29/22 Page 7 of 13
Case 7:20-cv-00134-MCR-GRJ Document 163 Filed 04/29/22 Page 8 of 13
Case 7:20-cv-00134-MCR-GRJ Document 163 Filed 04/29/22 Page 9 of 13
Case 7:20-cv-00134-MCR-GRJ Document 163 Filed 04/29/22 Page 10 of 13
Case 7:20-cv-00134-MCR-GRJ Document 163 Filed 04/29/22 Page 11 of 13
Case 7:20-cv-00134-MCR-GRJ Document 163 Filed 04/29/22 Page 12 of 13
REDACTED

Case 7:20-cv-00134-MCR-GRJ Document 163 Filed 04/29/22 Page 13 of 13
#### § 51.18 Certificate forms.

Certificates shall be issued on forms approved by the Administrator.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JOHNNIE LEE DIRDEN,

 Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5933-MCR-HTC

ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL,

 Respondent.

______________________________/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 8. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Having conducted a de novo review of any 

objected to portions of the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the 

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 8, is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Petitioner’s 

failure to prosecute and failure to comply with orders of the Court.
Page 2 of 2 

Case No. 3:20cv5933-MCR-HTC

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of April 2021. 

s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Followup

Completed

Gormas. Michael (OSn

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject: '

Attachments:

Follow Up Flag:

Flag Status:

Hello everyone,

Faulk,Scott (OST)

Tuesday,April29, 2014 9:0SAM

'Icooper.huronairport@midconetwork.com';'Mayor@HuronSD.co.l]1'

Gormas, Michael(OST);Schlemmer,Kevin(OST);Martin,Michae~OST),

EASProposals to Serve Huron, SD ;;;: , 0' '-,'

BoutiqueAir.pdf;Great Lakes.pdf -<: r. ;~~~,~

I -:.:;,-r1=-J

.....J vO,;~

fTl::OfTl

::o~z

>::"':--f -1- ,00

~~::;.;.-:;-" ~-- co

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Huron, SD, as well as give you an

opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary

for Aviation and International Affairs.

By Order 2014-3-16, issued on March 28, 2014, the Department requesting proposals from air carriers

interested in providing EAS for a new term. In response to our request, Boutique Air and Great Lakes Aviation

submitted a proposal.

I have attached each air carrier's proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on

www.regulations.gov sometime today. I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you

may have as soon as possible, but no later than Thursday, May 29. Please send your comments directly to

michael.gormas@dot.gov_ Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included on the

distribution list.

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Scott Faulk

Transportation Industry Analyst

U.S. Department of Transportation

Office of Aviation Analysis

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

202-366-9721

1
#### Samuel P. Johnston, defendant in error, v. Robert H. Anthony, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 36,942.

Opinion filed November 27, 1934.

Rehearing denied December 10, 1934.

Joseph E. Winterbotham, for plaintiff in error. 0. J. 0. Wray, for defendant in error; James V. Sallemi and Altheimer, Mayer, Woods & Smith, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Sullivan

delivered the opinion of the court.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

JESSICA J LYUBLANOVITS,

Case 1:20-cv-00223-MW-GRJ Document 3 Filed 09/04/20 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

SADIE DARNELL

Case 1:20-cv-00223-MW-GRJ Document 3 Filed 09/04/20 Page 2 of 2