alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(ii)

I, J. Robert Buchanan, Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) of National
Bankshares, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of National Bankshares, Inc.

    2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

    3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15 (e) and 15d - 15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

        (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

        (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluations; and

        (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

        (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

        (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: March 15, 2004

                                /s/ J. ROBERT BUCHANAN
                                -----------------------------
                               J. Robert Buchanan
                                    Treasurer
                                (Principal Financial Officer)




                                       58
22.403-1 Construction Wage Rate

Requirements statute.

40 U.S.C. chapter 31, subchapter IV, Wage Rate Requirements (Construction), formerly known as

the Davis-Bacon Act, provides that contracts in excess of $2,000 to which the United States or the

District of Columbia is a party for construction, alteration, or repair (including painting and

decorating) of public buildings or public works within the United States, shall contain a clause (see

52.222-6) that no laborer or mechanic employed directly upon the site of the work shall receive less

than the prevailing wage rates as determined by the Secretary of Labor.

Parent topic: 22.403 Statutory, Executive Order, and regulatory requirements.
#### § 500.9 Photographs for news or advertising.

Photographs for news purposes may be taken at the USNA without prior permission. Photographs for advertising and other commercial purposes may be taken, but only with the prior approval of the Director, USNA and fees may be charged pursuant to § 500.23.
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Meeting Documentation: Microchip Technology Inc. Date Staff Contact Information 

(Name, email, phone #) 

Name of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., 

applicability, reporting requirements, etc.)

WrittComProvDid tsubmDock

April 27, 2010 Tempe, AZ 

Kirsten Cappel (202) 343-9556 cappel.kirsten@epa.gov 

Jeff Thomas jeff.thomas@microchip.com Alan Abbott alan.abbot@microchip.com Joy Jones joy.jones@microchip.com Xia Su xia.su@microchip.com Mike Sherer, Sherer Consulting Services, Inc. Msherereng@aol.com 

Microchip provided a general overview of their manufacturing operations. Microchip identified questions and concerns with the proposed rule, Electronics Manufacturing, subpart I (see Microchips public comments in the docket). Meeting included a tour of the facility. 

Micrsubmcomdock
13.302-3 Obtaining contractor acceptance

and modifying purchase orders.

(a) When it is desired to consummate a binding contract between the parties before the contractor

undertakes performance, the contracting officer shall require written (see 2.101) acceptance of the

purchase order by the contractor.

(b) Each purchase order modification shall identify the order it modifies and shall contain an

appropriate modification number.

(c) A contractor’s written acceptance of a purchase order modification may be required only if-

(1) Determined by the contracting officer to be necessary to ensure the contractor’s compliance with

the purchase order as revised; or

(2) Required by agency regulations.

Parent topic: 13.302 Purchase orders.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74706-74707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30258]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Baseline Filings

November 24, 2010.

Centana Intrastate Pipeline, LLC.  Docket No. PR10-84-001.
Centana Intrastate Pipeline, LLC.  Docket No. PR10-85-001.
                                   Not Consolidated.
 


[[Page 74707]]

    Take notice that on November 23, 2010, the applicants listed above 
submitted a revised baseline filing of their Statement of Operating 
Conditions for services provided under section 311 of the Natural Gas 
Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA).
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#70363522333f1e1c191e15230500001f020430161502135e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="61272433222e0f0d080f04321411110e131521070413024f060e17">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern time on Monday, December 6, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30258 Filed 11-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Sara Tirschwell for Mayor, Inc. v Kramer

2024 NY Slip Op 32655(U)

July 31, 2024

Supreme Court, New York County

Docket Number: Index No. 154123/2021

Judge: Sabrina Kraus

Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York

State and local government sources, including the New

York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service.

This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official

publication.
[* 1]
[* 2]
[* 3]
[* 4]
[* 5]
[* 6]
#### In the Matter of Lake Hawthorne Homeowners Association, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v Thomas A. Coughlin, III, as Commissioner of the Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities of the State of New York, Respondent. (Matter No. 1.); Town of North Salem, Petitioner, and Lake Hawthorne Homeowners Association, Inc., et al., Intervenors, v State of New York, Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities et al., Respondents. (Matter No. 2.); Lake Hawthorne Homeowners Association, Inc., et al., Respondents, v Hugh Carey, as Governor of the State of New York, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Matter No. 3.)

Consolidated proceedings (above-captioned Matters Nos. 1 and 2) pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, dated January 10, 1979, which, after a hearing, found that the establishment of a community residence facility at a contested location would be appropriate. Appeal (in above-captioned Matter No. 3) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 1, 1979, which preliminarily enjoined the establishment or operation of said community residence facility. This appeal brings up for review so much of a further order of the same court, dated January 16, 1980, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original decision. Determination confirmed and proceedings (Matters Nos. 1 and 2) dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. Appeal from the order dated August 1, 1979 dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated January 16, 1980 reversed insofar as reviewed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, order dated August 1, 1979 vacated and motion for a preliminary injunction denied. The determination of the commissioner is supported by substantial evidence in the record (see *Matter of Town of Greenburgh v Coughlin,*73 AD2d 672). It follows that the order preliminarily enjoining the operation of the community residence in question must be reversed. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Rabin, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 14, 2008, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Kohlberg Capital Corporation (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph relating to the valuation of investments whose fair values have been estimated by management in the absence of readily determinable fair values), and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kohlberg Capital Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

New York, New York 

March 14, 2008
28.101-2 Solicitation provision or contract

clause.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert a provision or clause substantially the same as the provision

at 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee, in solicitations or contracts that require a bid guarantee or similar

guarantee. For example, the contracting officer may modify this provision-

(1) To set a period of time that is other than 10 days for the return of executed bonds;

(2) For use in connection with construction solicitations when the agency has specified that only

separate bid bonds are acceptable in accordance with 28.101-1(b);

(3) For use in solicitations for negotiated contracts; or

(4) For use in service contracts containing options for extended performance.

(b) The contracting officer shall determine the amount of the bid guarantee for insertion in the

provision at 52.228-1 (see 28.102-2(a)). The amount shall be adequate to protect the Government

from loss should the successful bidder fail to execute further contractual documents and bonds as

required. The bid guarantee amount shall be at least 20 percent of the bid price but shall not exceed

$3 million. When the penal sum is expressed as a percentage, a maximum dollar limitation may be

stated.

Parent topic: 28.101 Bid guarantees.
36.523 Site visit.

The contracting officer shall insert a provision substantially the same as the provision at 52.236-27,

Site Visit (Construction), in solicitations which include the clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site

Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work. AlternateI may be

used when an organized site visit will be conducted.

Parent topic: Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
#### § 4284.932 Simplified application.

Applicants requesting less than $50,000 will be allowed to submit a simplified application, the contents of which will be announced in an annual solicitation issued pursuant to § 4284.915. Applicants requesting Working Capital Grants of less than $50,000 are not required to provide Feasibility Studies or Business Plans, but must provide information demonstrating increases in customer base and revenue returns to the producers supplying the majority of the Agricultural Commodity as a result of the project. See § 4284.922(b)(6)(ii).
#### §§ 4287.308-4287.311 [Reserved]
#### § 505.6 Payment of fees.

NAL charges for interlibrary loans through OCLC's IFM Program (an electronic debit/credit payment program for libraries using OCLC's resource sharing service) or by invoice through the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) of the United States Department of Commerce. Payment for invoiced services will be made by check, money order, or credit card in U.S. funds directly to NTIS upon receipt of invoice from NTIS. NAL encourages users to establish deposit accounts with NTIS for payment of interlibrary loan fees. Subject to a reduction for the actual costs of performing the invoicing service by NTIS, all funds will be returned to NAL for credit to the appropriations account charged with the cost of processing the interlibrary loan request.
19.1406          Sole source awards.(a)                    						             A contracting officer shall consider a contract award to a SDVOSB concern on a sole source basis (see 6.302-5(b)(6)), before considering small business set-asides (see 19.203 and subpart 19.5) provided none of the exclusions of 19.1404 apply and—                                      (1)                          								                 The contracting officer does not have a reasonable expectation that offers would be received from two or more service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns;                                         (2)                          								                 The anticipated award price of the contract, including options, will not exceed-                                                  (i)                                										                     										 											$7 million 										 for a requirement within the NAICS codes for manufacturing; or                                                     (ii)                                										                     $4 million for a requirement within any other NAICS code;                                                                  (3)                          								                 The requirement is not currently being performed by an 8(a) participant under the provisions of subpart  19.8 or has been accepted as a requirement by SBA under subpart  19.8;                                         (4)                          								                 The service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern has been determined to be a responsible contractor with respect to performance; and                                         (5)                          								                 Award can be made at a fair and reasonable price.                                                (b) Effective January 1, 2024, a contracting officer shall only award a sole-source contract to a concern that—                                      (1)                         Is designated in SAM as an SDVOSB concern certified by SBA; or                                         (2)                         Has represented that it is an SDVOSB concern in SAM and submitted an application for certification to SBA on or before December 31, 2023. Pending applications for certification are in the SBA Veteran Small Business Certification Program database at https://veterans.certify.sba.gov.                                                (c) The SBA has the right to appeal the contracting officer’s decision not to make an SDVOSB sole-source award.**Parent topic:** Subpart 19.14 - Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74686-74687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30231]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


North American Free-Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904 
Binational Panel Reviews

AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of decision of panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 74687]]

SUMMARY: On November 26, 2010, the binational panel issued its decision 
in the review of the United States International Trade Commission's 
(the Commission) final injury determination in Light-Walled Rectangular 
Pipe and Tube from China, Korea, and Mexico (NAFTA Secretariat File 
Number USA-MEX-2008-1904-04). The binational panel upheld in part and 
remanded in part the Commission's determination. The Commission is 
directed to issue its remand determination within sixty days from the 
date of this panel decision. Copies of the panel decision are available 
from the U.S. Section of the NAFTA Secretariat.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Valerie Dees, United States Secretary, 
NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, 
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade 
Agreement (``Agreement'') establishes a mechanism to replace domestic 
judicial review of final determinations in antidumping and 
countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with 
review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel 
Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national 
courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine 
whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of 
the country that made the determination.
    Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on 
January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of 
Canada and the Government of Mexico established Rules of Procedure for 
Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (``Rules''). These Rules were 
published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686). 
The panel review in this matter has been conducted in accordance with 
these Rules.

     Dated: November 26, 2010.
Valerie Dees,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2010-30231 Filed 11-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

      <ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         564,898
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,435,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                   508,640
<INVENTORY>                                 35,459,724
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,381,421
<PP&E>                                      39,154,413
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,130,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,932,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,361,296
<BONDS>                                        788,444
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,664
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,654,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,932,459
<SALES>                                    177,348,675
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           177,348,675
<CGS>                                      115,056,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              115,056,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            55,510,026
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,366,863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,308,055
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,217,661
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,525,716
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,525,716
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55


</TABLE>