CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

 APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 1

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

 District: South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule No: 1132 

 

 Date Adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended 05/05/06 

 Rule Title: Further Control of VOC Emissions from High-Emitting Spray Booth Facilities 

 

Date Submitted to ARB: March 5, 2009

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): May 7, 2004 

Is the rule intended to be sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? (x) Yes ( ) No. If NO, do not 

complete remainder of form. 

 District Contact: Helmy Sultan Phone Number: (909) 396-2362 

 Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: ( ) New Rule (x) Amended Rule 

Rule 1132- Further Control of VOC Emissions from High-Emitting Spray Booth Facilities 

was amended to modify the definition of Approved Emission Factors to exclude the use 

of the Unified Emission Factors (UEF) rates for gel coat nonatomizing application 

emissions calculations.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Circle): ROG NOx SO2 CO TAC (name): ROG (Such as 

Styrene and Methylmethacrylate)

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

 Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in 

emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet 

showing how the emission information provided below was determined. 

 Net Effect on Emissions: ( ) Increase ( ) Decrease (X) N/A 

 The amendments to Rule 1132 result in no impact on air quality or emissions.

 SCC/CES Code Affected: If a SCC Code is Assigned, SIC Code Affected: 3081-89 & 3731-32 

 (NOTE: If more than one SCC or CES code or more than one combination of SCC and SIC codes are 

 needed, fill out the following information on a separate form for each combination of codes.) 

 Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: 1998-99 

 

 Area Affected: South Coast Air Quality Management District 

 Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible): N/A

 
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

 APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: ( ) Attainment (x) Nonattainment ( ) Split 

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: 66 

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 % 

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 6 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach 

additional sheets as necessary): 

 Facility Name Facility ID Location City County Name

1. Lasco Bathware, Inc. 24060 Anaheim Orange

2. Xerxes Corporation 70021 Anaheim Orange

3. Consolidation Drum 118800 Montebello Los Angeles

4. The Hon Company 006262 South Gate Los Angeles

5. Kushwood Mfg 112597 Ontario San Bernardino 

6. Resinart Corporation 020302 Costa Mesa Orange

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? (x) Yes ( ) No 

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) (c) of the Rule. 

Section (c) requires 65 percent reduction in VOC emissions using low-VOC materials, 

add-on control or a combination of both techniques. 

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are the following: 

Section (d)(1)(A) of the Alternative Compliance Plan requires nonatomizing spray 

application technologies for spraying resins. 

 

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains: 

Emission Limits in Section(s): (c), (d)(1), (d)(2) and (d)(3). 

Work Practice Standards in Section(s): (d)(1)(A). 

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): (g)

 

Attach a Completed EPA SIP Approvability Checklist - Enforceability or Provide an Equivalent 

Compliance/Enforcement Strategy Statement. 

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

(X) No Impact ( ) Impacts RFP ( ) Impacts attainment 

Discussion: N/A