alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# ~A'"

2.010- ()O,! J 9. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA hasthis proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted 

### Date Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 

# 1hJtJ1 

# --- Regional Airline Association Daw Lot!(>rer 

# 1ho/dJ 

# - Aircruft Owners & Pilots Association Rober! H3ckman 

# 0/1)0 tf(

~ ATA Craig Fabian 

# 1h~ 'I'l1
**Exhibit 32**
 
**CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**
This Certificate is beingdelivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (MailFraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Codeand shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.
The undersigned, who are the ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of FNB BankingCompany (the “Company”), hereby each certify as follows:
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company (the“Report”) for the period ended March 31, 2003, which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
This 14th day of August 2003.
 
*  /s/ J. Charles Copeland                 *J. Charles Copeland, President(Chief Executive Officer)
* / s/ Mark Flowers                              *Mark Flowers, Assistant Treasurer(Chief Financial Officer)
 
 
A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to FNB Banking Company and will be retained by the  Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Santini Restaurants, Inc., Petitioner, v. State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Determination of the New York State Liquor Authority disapproving petitioner’s application for a restaurant liquor license unanimously annulled, on the law, with *$50*costs and disbursements to petitioner, the petition granted and the Authority directed to grant petitioner’s application. On the basis of the record, neither the “ adverse license history ” of the subject premises nor the “sensitive area” in which it is located justified the denial of the application. (See *Matter of Sled Hill Cafe*v. *Hostetter,*22 N Y 2d 607, 613; *Matter of Clara & Bernard Rest.*v. *New York State Liq. Auth.,*22 A D 2d 871, 872; *Matter of Waverly Rest. Corp.*v. *State Liq. Auth.,*24 A D 2d 985, 986.) Furthermore, the Authority had no right to ground its determination on the supposition that the principals of the licensee would fail to exercise the proper “ degree of personal supervision ” over the licensed premises and that they would not “have a highly competent, experienced and vigilant staff to insure the lawful, orderly and proper conduct of such premises ”. The Authority may not justify the denial of a proper liquor license application submitted by responsible persons, on the basis of a mere speculation that the premises would be operated in violation of law. *(Matter of Sled Hill Cafe*v. *Hostetter, supra; Matter of 238 Rest.*v. *New York State Liq. Auth.,*19 Misc 2d 975, 978.) Under the circumstances, we conclude that “ the Authority’s conclusions are based on speculative inferences unsupported by the record ” and, therefore, “its determination should be annulled” on the ground that it is “without foundation in reason or evidence”. (See *Matter of Sled Hill Cafe*V. *Hostetter, supra,*pp. 612-613.) Concur—Stevens, P. J., Eager, McGivern and Nunez, JJ.
#  Federal Acquisition Regulation

- Part 34 - Major System Acquisition 
- Part 35 - Research and Development Contracting 
- Part 36 - Construction and Architect-Engineer Contracts 
- Part 37 - Service Contracting 
- Part 38 - Federal Supply Schedule Contracting 
- Part 39 - Acquisition of Information Technology 
- Part 40 - Reserved 
- Part 41 - Acquisition of Utility Services 

**Parent topic:**Subchapter F - Special Categories of Contracting
#### § 51.1910 Fairly smooth.

*Fairly smooth* means that the tomato is not conspicuously ridged or rough.
37.303 Payments.       (a) 						            The contract may provide that the-                                                         (1) 								                Government pay the contractor for the dismantling or demolition of structures; or                                                            (2) 								                Contractor pay the Government for the right to salvage and remove the materials resulting from the dismantling or demolition operation.                                                                             (b) 						            The contracting officer shall consider the usefulness to the Government of all salvageable property. Any of the property that is more useful to the Government than its value as salvage to the contractor should be expressly designated in the contract for retention by the Government. The contracting officer shall determine the fair market value of any property not so designated, since the contractor will get title to this property, and its value will therefore be important in determining what payment, if any, shall be made to the contractor and whether additional compensation will be made if the contract is terminated.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 37.3 - Dismantling, Demolition, or Removal of Improvements
#### §§ 3555.258-3555.299 [Reserved]
#### § 60.126 [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

KEVIN RIEKER, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

NATIONAL CAR CURE, LLC, 

SUNPATH, LTD CORP. d/b/a 

SUNPATH LTD CORP. OF 

DELAWARE, and NORTHCOAST 

WARRANTY SERVICES, INC., 

 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 3:20-cv-05901-TKW-HTC 

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Defendant, NATIONAL CAR CURE, LLC (“NCC”), by and through 

its undersigned counsel, hereby discloses the following pursuant to Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 7.1: 

1. The name of each person, attorney, association of persons, firm, 

law firm, partnership and corporation that has or may have an interest in the 

outcome of this action – including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, 

parent corporations, publicly-traded companies that own 10% or more of a 

party’s stock, and all other identifiable legal entities related to any party in 

the case: 
National Car Cure, LLC Defendant

SunPath, Ltd Corp. d/b/a SunPath 

Ltd Corp. of Delaware

Defendant 

Northcoast Warranty Services, Inc. Defendant

Jason S. Weiss, Esq. Attorney for Defendant

Weiss Law Group, P.A. Attorneys for Defendant

Amy L. Bennecoff Ginsburg, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff

Kimmel & Silverman, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

NCC states that there are no other persons, associations or persons, 

firms, partnerships, guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary 

corporations, or other legal entities that are financially interested in the 

outcome of the case other than the parties to this action and their 

respective counsel.

2. The name of every other entity whose publicly-traded stock, 

equity or debt may be substantially affected by the outcome of the 

proceedings: 

None.

3. The name of every other entity which is likely to be an active 

participant in the proceedings, including the debtor and members of the 

creditor’s committee (or twenty largest unsecured creditors) in bankruptcy 

cases: 

None.
4. The name of each victim (individual or corporate) of civil and 

criminal conduct alleged to be wrongful, including every person who may 

be entitled to restitution. 

Plaintiff and National Car Cure, LLC.

I hereby certify that, except as disclosed above, I am unaware of any 

action or potential conflict of interest involving the district judge and 

magistrate judge assigned to this case, and will immediately notify the Court 

in writing on learning of any such conflict. 

Dated: January 11, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Jason S. Weiss 

Jason S. Weiss 

jason@jswlawyer.com

Fla. Bar No. 356890 

WEISS LAW GROUP, P.A.

5531 North University Drive, Suite 103 

Coral Springs, FL 33067 

Tel: 954-573-2800 

Fax: 954-573-2798 

Counsel for National Car Cure, LLC 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on this 11th day of January, 2021, I caused a copy of the 

foregoing document to be served via ECF on all parties entitled to receive notice. 

/s/ Jason S. Weiss

 Jason S. Weiss
#### The People of the State of New York v. Victor Sanchez.

Motion denied. (See *People*v. *Lewis,*30 A D 2d 931, 932.) Concur— Capozzoli, J. P., Tilzer, McGivern, Markewich and Nunez, JJ.
32.112 Nonpayment of subcontractors under

contracts other than for commercial products

and commercial services.

32.112-1 Subcontractor assertions of nonpayment.

32.112-2 Subcontractor requests for information.

Parent topic: Subpart 32.1 - Financing for Other Than a Commercial Purchase
#### In the Matter of Delza B. Smith, Respondent, v Mario M. Cuomo, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the Secretary of State, or any person acting under him, from taking further acts or proceedings pursuant to a notice of hearing as to a charge of untrustworthiness and incompetency against petitioner, the Secretary of State appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 20, 1978, which, upon denying his motion to dismiss, granted the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, motion to dismiss granted, and proceeding dismissed. Special Term determined that the petitioner’s alleged violation of local zoning ordinances in renting five premises that the petitioner owned, could not be considered on the issue of his incompetency and untrustworthiness under section 441-c of the Real Property Law. It also found that the petitioner was acting in his capacity as a landlord, rather than in his capacity as a broker, in renting the subject premises. It reasoned that even if the violations were proved by substantial evidence, the petitioner could not be found to be untrustworthy, and therefore granted the petition to prohibit the hearing on the charges. In doing so, Special Term relied on *Matter of Berry v Lomenzo*(39 AD2d 745). We disagree. Prohibition is an extraordinary remedy granted in situations where the petitioner has a clear legal right to this remedy *(Matter of B. T. Prods, v Barr,*44 NY2d 226, 231). Here the petitioner does not have a clear legal right to the remedy. There is at least a question as to whether a violation of zoning ordinances reflects on the petitioner’s trustworthiness in his role as a broker (see *Matter of Diona v Lomenzo,*26 AD2d 473). Moreover, the question of the petitioner’s capacity in renting the premises is a factual one which should be decided after a hearing on the charges. No facts concerning the transactions were presented in the papers. Thus, Special Term’s finding was premature and the judgment must be reversed. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
# L_2014172EN.01005901.xml

| 12.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 172/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 172/59

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1242/2013 of 25 November 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Cordero Segureño (PGI)]

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 323 of 4 December 2013
  )

On page 6, Annex:

for:

‘Class 1.2. Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)’,

read:

‘Class 1.1. Fresh meat (and offal)’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Nov-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Feb-28-1997
<CASH>                        1,425,059
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 82,774
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1,507,833
<PP&E>                        20,442,639
<DEPRECIATION>                (8,491,864)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                15,235,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         521,216
<BONDS>                       2,608,332
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    8,193,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  15,235,541
<SALES>                       716,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              741,521
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 330,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              315,409
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            100,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (5,177)
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (5,177)
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  (5,177)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.13)
        

</TABLE>
37.113-1 Waiver of cost allowability limitations.       (a) 						            The head of the agency may waive the 31.205-6(g)(6) cost allowability limitations on severance payments to foreign nationals for contracts that-                                                         (1) 								                Provide significant support services for-                                                                           (i) 										                    Members of the armed forces stationed or deployed outside the United States, or                                                                              (ii) 										                    Employees of an executive agency posted outside the United States; and                                                                                                           (2) 								                Will be performed in whole or in part outside the United States.                                                                             (b) 						            Waivers can be granted only before contract award.                                          (c) 						            Waivers cannot be granted for-                                                         (1) Military banking contracts, which are covered by                             10 U.S.C. 3744(d); or                                                            (2) 								                Severance payments made by a contractor to a foreign national employed by the contractor under a DoD service contract in the Republic of the Philippines, if the discontinuation of the foreign national is the result of the termination of basing rights of the United States military in the Republic of the Philippines (section1351(b) of Public Law102-484, 10 U.S.C.1592, note).    **Parent topic:** 37.113 Severance payments to foreign nationals.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# DATE AND TIME:

Wednesday, December 1, 2010, at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

 

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-30260 Filed 12-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
14.202-5 Descriptive literature.

(a) Policy. Contracting officers must not require bidders to furnish descriptive literature unless it is

needed before award to determine whether the products offered meet the specification and to

establish exactly what the bidder proposes to furnish.

(b) Justification. The contracting officer must document in the contract file the reasons why product

acceptability cannot be determined without the submission of descriptive literature, except when the

contract specifications require submission.

(c) Requirements of invitation for bids.

(1) The invitation must clearly state-

(i) What descriptive literature the bidders must furnish;

(ii) The purpose for requiring the literature;

(iii) The extent of its consideration in the evaluation of bids; and

(iv) The rules that will apply if a bidder fails to furnish the literature before bid opening or if the

literature provided does not comply with the requirements of the invitation.

(2) If bidders must furnish descriptive literature, see 14.201-6(p).

(d) Waiver of requirement for descriptive literature.

(1) The contracting officer may waive the requirement for descriptive literature if-

(i) The bidder states in the bid that the product being offered is the same as a product previously or

currently being furnished to the contracting activity; and

(ii) The contracting officer determines that the product offered by the bidder complies with the

specification requirements of the current invitation for bids. When the contracting officer waives the

requirement, see 14.201-6(p)(2).

(2) When descriptive literature is not necessary and a waiver of literature requirements of a

specification has been authorized, the contracting officer must include a statement in the invitation

that, despite the requirements of the specifications, descriptive literature will not be required.

(3) If the solicitation provides for a waiver, a bidder may submit a bid on the basis of either the

descriptive literature furnished with the bid or a previously furnished product. If the bid is submitted

on one basis, the bidder may not have it considered on the other basis after bids are opened.

(e) Unsolicited descriptive literature. If descriptive literature is furnished when it is not required by

the invitation for bids, the procedures set forth in 14.202-4(f) must be followed.

Parent topic: 14.202 General rules for solicitation of bids.
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER      COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)**

**First      Horizon Alternative Mortgage Securities Trust 2006-FA6**

|         |                                                                            |                          |
|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|         | First Horizon Home                Loan                Corporation               |
|    |                                                                       |                     |
|              | By:                                                                   | /s/ Kim                Yowell |
|         | Date:                03/01/07                                                   |
|         | Name:                  Kim YowellTitle:                  SVP, Servicing Manager |

|         |                                                                                |                                  |
|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|         | First Tennessee Mortgage Services,                    Inc.                          |
|    |                                                                           |                             |
|              | By:                                                                       | /s/ Terry                    L. McCoy |
|         | Date:                    03/01/07                                                   |
|         | Name:                      Terry L. McCoyTitle:                      Vice President |

----
32.801 Definitions.       *Designated agency*, as used in this subpart, means any department or agency of the executive branch of the United States Government (see 32.803(d)).          *No-setoff commitment*, as used in this subpart, means a contractual undertaking that, to the extent permitted by the Act, payments by the designated agency to the assignee under an assignment of claims will not be reduced to liquidate the indebtedness of the contractor to the Government.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 32.8 - Assignment of Claims
47.503 Applicability.       (a) 						            Except as stated in paragraph (b) of this section and in 47.504, the Cargo Preference Acts of1904 and1954 described in 47.502(a) apply to the following cargoes:                                                         (1) 								                Supplies owned by the Government and in the possession of-                                                                           (i) 										                    The Government;                                                                              (ii) 										                    A contractor; or                                                                              (iii) 										                    A subcontractor at any tier.                                                                                                           (2) 								                Supplies for use of the Government that are contracted for and require subsequent delivery to a Government activity but are not owned by the Government at the time of shipment.                                                            (3) 								                Supplies not owned by the Government at the time of shipment that are to be transported for distribution to foreign assistance programs, but only if these supplies are not acquired or contracted for with local currency funds (see 47.504(b)).                                                                             (b) 						            Government-owned supplies to be shipped commercially that are-                                                         (1) 								                In the possession of a department, a contractor, or a subcontractor at any tier and                                                            (2) 								                For use of military departments shall be transported exclusively in privately owned U.S.-flag commercial vessels if such vessels are available at rates that are fair and reasonable for U.S.-flag commercial vessels.                                                                             (c) 						            The 50-percent requirement shall not prevent the use of privately owned U.S.-flag commercial vessels for transportation of up to 100 percent of the cargo subject to the Cargo Preference Act of1954.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 47.5 - Ocean Transportation by U.S.-Flag Vessels