alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 51.312 Mature. *“Mature”* means that the apples have reached the stage of development which will insure the proper completion of the ripening process. Before a mature apple becomes overripe it will show varying degrees of firmness, depending upon the stage of the ripening process. The following terms are used for describing different stages of firmness of apples: ( a ) *“Hard”* means apples with a tenacious flesh and starchy flavor.
( b ) *“Firm”* means apples with a tenacious flesh but which are becoming crisp with a slightly starchy flavor, except the Delicious variety.
( c ) *“Firm ripe”* means apples with crisp flesh except that the flesh of the Gano, Ben Davis, and Rome Beauty varieties may be slightly mealy.
( d ) *“Ripe”* means apples with mealy flesh and soon to become soft for the variety.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

GARY LEE SEYMOUR,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-214-TKW-MJF

RICKY D. DIXON,

Defendant.

/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation. (Doc. 62). No objections were filed.

Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the case file, 

the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that there are genuine 

disputes of material fact that preclude summary judgment on Plaintiff’s disability 

discrimination claims. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by 

reference in this Order.

2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 54) is DENIED.

Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF Document 64 Filed 11/10/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The Clerk shall return this case to the magistrate judge for further 

pretrial proceedings, including a settlement conference at an 

appropriate point.

DONE and ORDERED this 10th day of November, 2022.

__________________________________

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF Document 64 Filed 11/10/22 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with  the  IGENE Biotechnology,  Inc.  (the
"Company ')  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the  period  ended
December  31,  2006,  as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen F.  Hiu,
President  of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The   information   contained   in  the  Report  fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 30, 2007           By: /S/ STEPHEN F. HIU
                                   ______________________________
                                       STEPHEN F. HIU
                                       President


A  signed original of this written statement required by  Section
906  has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### §§ 4279.218-4279.219 [Reserved]
52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on

Postconsumer Fiber Content Paper.

As prescribed in 4.303 , insert the following clause:

Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber Content Paper (May 2011)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clausePostconsumer fiber means-

(1) Paper, paperboard, and fibrous materials from retail stores, office buildings, homes, and so forth,

after they have passed through their end-usage as a consumer item, including: used corrugated

boxes; old newspapers; old magazines; mixed waste paper; tabulating cards; and used cordage; or

(2) All paper, paperboard, and fibrous materials that enter and are collected from municipal solid

waste; but not

(3) Fiber derived from printers’ over-runs, converters’ scrap, and over-issue publications.

(b) The Contractor is required to submit paper documents, such as offers, letters, or reports that are

printed or copied double-sided on paper containing at least 30 percent postconsumer fiber,

whenever practicable, when not using electronic commerce methods to submit information or data

to the Government.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.204 [Reserved]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2685 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain textured rolled glass sheets. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 1, 2006 

Mr. LUGAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain textured rolled 

glass sheets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN TEXTURED ROLLED GLASS SHEETS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by striking heading 9902.70.03 and inserting in 

7 numerical sequence the following: 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 2685 IS 

‘‘ 9902.70.03 Rolled glass in sheets, yellow-green in color, not finished or edged-worked, textured on one surface, suitable for incorporation in 

cooking stoves, ranges, or 

ovens described in subheading 8516.60.40 (provided for in subheading 

7003.12.00 or 7003.19.00) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
Sara Tirschwell for Mayor, Inc. v Kramer 2024 NY Slip Op 32655(U) July 31, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County
Docket Number: Index No. 154123/2021 Judge: Sabrina Kraus Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

Op 30001 (U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New

York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

### [* 1]

### [* 2]

### [* 3]

### [* 4]

### [* 5]

### [* 6]
§ 51.1812 U.S. No. 1. “U.S. No. 1” consists of tangerines which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Discoloration: Not more than one-third of the surface, in the aggregate, may be affected by discoloration. (See § 51.1828.);
( 2 ) Fairly well colored;
( 3 ) Firm;
( 4 ) Mature; and,
( 5 ) Well formed.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Decay;
( 2 ) Unhealed skin breaks; and,
( 3 ) Wormy fruit.
( c ) Free from damage caused by: ( 1 ) Ammoniation;
( 2 ) Bruises;
( 3 ) Buckskin;
( 4 ) Caked melanose;
( 5 ) Creasing;
( 6 ) Dirt or other foreign material;
( 7 ) Disease;
( 8 ) Dryness or mushy condition;
( 9 ) Green spots;
( 10 ) Hail;
( 11 ) Insects;
( 12 ) Oil spots;
( 13 ) Scab;
( 14 ) Scale;
( 15 ) Scars;
( 16 ) Skin breakdown;
( 17 ) Sprayburn;
( 18 ) Sunburn; and
( 19 ) Other means.
( d ) For tolerances see § 51.1820.
# L_2021044EN.01000101.xml

| 9.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 44/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 44/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/147

of 2 February 2021

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Český modrý mák’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Czechia’s application to register the name ‘Český modrý mák’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Czechia’s application to register the name ‘Český modrý mák’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Český modrý mák’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Český modrý mák’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Český modrý mák’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.8. Other products listed in Annex I to the Treaty (spices etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 February 2021.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 317, 25.9.2020, p. 31.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
Order entered December 12, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00133-CV

SKY CAPITAL GROUP, LTD, Appellant

V.

BOMBARDIER, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-08-02249

ORDER

We GRANT the December 11, 2013 unopposed motion for extension of time to file 

appellant’s reply brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than January 23, 2014. 

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
PROVIDENT FUNDING ASSOCIATES, L.P.


                        ATTESTATION REPORT OF INDEPENDENT

                        REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


                                DECEMBER 31, 2006



<PAGE>


        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




        To the Partners of
        Provident Funding Associates, L.P.:


        We  have  examined   management's   assertion  that  Provident   Funding
        Associates,  L.P.  (the  "Company")  has  complied  with the  applicable
        servicing  criteria  in  paragraph  (d)  of  Regulation  AB,  Item  1122
        enumerated  in Appendix A, as of and for the year  ending  December  31,
        2006 (see Appendix A). Provident Funding  Associates,  L.P.'s management
        is responsible for Provident Funding Associates,  L.P.'s compliance with
        the applicable  servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an
        opinion on management's  assertion about the Company's  compliance based
        on our examination.

        Our examination was conducted in accordance with  attestation  standards
        established by the Public  Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board (United
        States) and, accordingly,  included examining, on a test basis, evidence
        about the Company's  compliance with the applicable  servicing  criteria
        and performing such other  procedures as we considered  necessary in the
        circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination  provides a reasonable
        basis  for  our  opinion.  Our  examination  does  not  provide  a legal
        determination  on the Company's  compliance  with  applicable  servicing
        criteria.

        In our opinion,  management's  assertion that the Company  complied with
        aforementioned  applicable  servicing  criteria  as of and for the  year
        ending  December 31, 2006, is fairly stated,  in all material  respects,
        based on the applicable servicing criteria enumerated in Appendix A.


        /s/ Moss Adams LLP
        Stockton, California
        February 27, 2007
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CLARIBEL A. CORONA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) CITIMORTGAGE, INC; AMY J. CORONA; ) COUNTRY CHASE MASTER ) Case No. 2D16-4943 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.; ) COUNTRY CHASE TOWNHOMES ) PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, ) INC.; COUNTRY CHASE RESIDENTIAL ) HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.; ) ANY AND ALL UNKNOWN PARTIES ) CLAIMING BY, THROUGH, UNDER, ) OR AGAINST THE HEREIN NAMED ) INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT(S) WHO ARE ) NOT KNOWN TO BE DEAD OR ALIVE, ) WHETHER SAID UNKNOWN PARTIES ) MAY CLAIM AN INTEREST AS ) SPOUSES, HEIRS, DEVISEES, ) GRANTEES, OR OTHER CLAIMANTS; ) UNKNOWN TENANT whose name is ) fictitious to account for parties in ) possession, ) ) Appellees. ) )

Opinion filed February 14, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Mark D. Kiser, Judge.- 2 -

Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, LLC, Tampa; and Latasha Scott of Lord Scott, PLLC, Tampa, for Appellant.

Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; William P. Heller of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale; and Eric M. Levine of Akerman LLP, West Palm Beach, for Appellee CitiMortgage, Inc.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, CRENSHAW, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
32.502 Preaward matters.       This section covers matters that generally are relevant only before contract award. This does not preclude taking actions discussed here after award, if appropriate; *e.g.,* postaward addition of a Progress Payments clause for consideration.    **32.502-1 Use of customary progress payments.****32.502-2 Contract finance office clearance.****32.502-3 Solicitation provisions.****32.502-4 Contract clauses.****Parent topic:** Subpart 32.5 - Progress Payments Based on Costs
160 So.2d 596

#### Grant DELLIHOUE v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, Halliburton Company and Meredith S. Hailey.

No. 47089.

Feb. 24, 1964.

Court of Appeal, Third Circuit.

159 So.2d 13.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
32.806 Contract clauses.

(a)

(1) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.232-23, Assignment of Claims, in solicitations

and contracts expected to exceed the micro-purchase threshold, unless the contract will prohibit the

assignment of claims (see 32.803(b)). The use of the clause is not required for purchase orders.

However, the clause may be used in purchase orders expected to exceed the micro-purchase

threshold, that are accepted in writing by the contractor, if such use is consistent with agency

policies and regulations.

(2) If a no-setoff commitment has been authorized (see 32.803(d)), the contracting officer shall use

the clause with its AlternateI.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.232-24, Prohibition of Assignment of Claims,

in solicitations and contracts for which a determination has been made under agency regulations

that the prohibition of assignment of claims is in the Government’s interest.

Parent topic: Subpart 32.8 - Assignment of Claims
§ 51.2648 Tolerances. In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling in each of the foregoing grades, the following tolerances, by count, are provided as specified: ( a ) For defects at shipping point [2] — ( 1 ) *U.S. No. 1.* 8 percent for cherries which fail to meet the requirements for this grade: *Provided,* That included in this amount not more than 4 percent shall be allowed for defects causing serious damage, including in this latter amount not more than one-half of 1 percent for cherries which are affected by decay.
( 2 ) *U.S. Commercial.* 16 percent for cherries which fail to meet the requirements for this grade: *Provided,* That included in this amount not more than 4 percent shall be allowed for defects causing serious damage, including in this latter amount not more than one-half of 1 percent for cherries affected by decay.
( b ) *For defects en route or at destination* — ( 1 ) *U.S. No. 1.* 12 percent for cherries in any lot which fail to meet the requirements for this grade: *Provided,* That included in this amount not more than the following percentages shall be allowed for defects listed: ( i ) 8 percent for cherries which fail to meet the requirements for this grade because of permanent defects; or,
( ii ) 6 percent for cherries which are seriously damaged, including therein not more than 4 percent for cherries which are seriously damaged by permanent defects and not more than 2 percent for cherries which are affected by decay.
( 2 ) *U.S. Commercial.* 24 percent for cherries in any lot which fail to meet the requirements for this grade: *Provided,* That included in this amount not more than the following percentages shall be allowed for defects listed: ( i ) 16 percent for cherries which fail to meet the requirements for this grade because of permanent defects; or,
( ii ) 6 percent for cherries which are seriously damaged, including therein not more than 4 percent for cherries which are seriously damaged by permanent defects and not more than 2 percent for cherries which are affected by decay.
( c ) *For off-size.* 5 percent for cherries which fail to meet the specified minimum diameter and 10 percent for cherries that fail to meet any specified maximum diameter.
Footnotes -
51.2648
[2] Shipping point, as used in these standards, means the point of origin of the shipment in the producing area or at port of loading for ship stores or overseas shipment, or, in the case of shipments from outside the continental United States, the port of entry into the United States.
32.706-1 Clauses for contracting in advance

of funds.

(a) Insert the clause at 52.232-18, Availability of Funds, in solicitations and contracts if the contract

will be chargeable to funds of the new fiscal year and the contract action will be initiated before the

funds are available.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.232-19, Availability of Funds for the Next

Fiscal Year, in solicitations and contracts if a one-year indefinite-quantity or requirements contract

for services is contemplated and the contract-

(1) Is funded by annual appropriations; and

(2) Is to extend beyond the initial fiscal year (see 32.703-2(b)).

Parent topic: 32.706 Contract clauses.
SERVEDAPRIL 1,2011 - -./r-r nr-^rnM]r,i- \ 

:i! :n|. _u A 10^ 30 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GOJET AIRLINES, LI C 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10CE|O0 3 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-002 

1 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GOJET AIRLINES, LLC 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10CE0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0190 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME 

TO FILE REBUTTAL BRIEF 
For good cause shown, the motion of the Federal Aviation Administration 

("Complainant") for an extension of time to April 14, 2011 to file its Rebuttal Brief in 

these matters (to which Respondent GoJet Airlines, LLC does not object) is GRANTED. 

The Post Hearing Briefing Schedule is hereby amended as follows: 

The Federal Aviation Administration shall file its Rebuttal Brief on or 

before April 14, 2011. 

^ ^(r^^4;i^^t^'-^-^ 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket Nos. CP10CE0003 & 

CP10CE0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Mr. Richard A. Leach 

GoJet Airlines, LLC, Respondent 

11495 Navaid Road, Suite 303 

St. Louis, MO 63044 

David J. A. Hayes III, Respondent's Counsel 

Vice-President & General Counsel 

Trans States Holdings, Inc. 

11495 Navaid Road 

Bridgeton, MO 63044 

TEL: 314-222-4316 

.FAX: 314-222-4311 

David B. Kessler, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Central Region, ACE-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

DOT Building 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3763 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
§ 52.49 Charges for copies of inspection documents and/or inspection data. If the applicant for inspection service requests additional copies of inspection documents and/or inspection data referable to the processed product covered thereby, the applicant may obtain such copies from the supervisor in the office of inspection serving the area where the service was performed at a charge of 1 ⁄ 2 hour per copy in accordance with the rate in § 52.42: Provided, that no charge shall be made for one copy if requested at the time of the original request for inspection. Inspection certificates issued in accordance with § 52.21 may be supplied to any financially interested party at a charge of 1 ⁄ 2 hour per certificate for each seven (7), or fewer copies in accordance with the rate in § 52.42. [54 FR 50732, Dec. 11, 1989]
#### § 46.36 Publicity.

Upon the issuance by the Secretary of an order revoking or suspending a license, or in case of automatic suspension of a license for failure to pay a reparation award, the Director shall cause general publicity to be given to such fact, in order that those doing business with the licensee whose license has been revoked or suspended may take due notice thereof.