Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices 7031 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of 

January 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3015 Filed 2–12–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–71,608] 

Xilinx, Inc., Albuquerque, NM; Notice of 

Affirmative Determination Regarding 

Application for Reconsideration 

By application dated January 8, 2010, 

the petitioners requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The determination was issued on 

December 17, 2009. The Notice of 

Determination will soon be published in 

the Federal Register. 

The initial investigation resulted in a 

negative determination based on the 

finding that there was no increase in 

imports or shift/acquisition to or from 

abroad by the subject firm of services 

like or directly competitive with the 

internal engineering services supplied 

by workers of the subject firm. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

petitioners alleged that Xilinx, Inc. 

shifted provision of engineering services 

to a foreign country and provided 

documentation to support their 

allegations. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of 

January, 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3016 Filed 2–12–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of December 14 

through December 31, 2009. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
7032 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 1- 

year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) The 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1-year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–70,298; Leedsworld, Inc., dba 

Leed’s/Leased Workers from 

Callous Company, Warren, OH, 

May 20, 2008. 

TA–W–70,592; Boise White Paper, LLC, 

Bosie Paper Holdings, LLC, St. 

Helens, OR, May 19, 2008. 

TA–W–70,638; IMI Cornelius, Inc., 

Paramount Staffing, Staffing 

Network, Aerotex, Glendale 

Heights, IL, May 26, 2008. 

TA–W–70,655; L.L. Bean Manufacturing, 

Brunswick, ME, May 22, 2008. 

TA–W–71,801; Nautilus, Inc., 

Commercial Division, Leased 

Workers from Select Staffing, 

Independence, VA, July 22, 2008. 

TA–W–72,373; Plastic Dress Up 

Company, South El Monte, CA, 

September 21, 2008. 

TA–W–70,147; Lee Mah Electronics, San 

Francisco, CA, May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,150; CB&I Constructors, Inc., 

Provo Shop Division, Warren, PA, 

May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,492; Appleton Coated, LLC, A 

Subsidiary of Arjowiggins SAS, 

Combined Locks, WI, May 20, 2008. 

TA–W–70,523; Cox Mfg. Co., Inc., 

Hildebran, NC, May 21, 2008. 

TA–W–70,581; CB&I Constructors, Inc., 

Provo Shop Division, Provo, UT, 

May 22, 2008. 

TA–W–70,820A; Marshall 

Manufacturing Corporation, Leased 

Workers from Staffing Solutions, 

Cape Canaveral, FL, May 28, 2008. 

TA–W–70,820; Marshall Manufacturing 

Corporation, Leased Workers from 

Staffing Solutions, Lewisburg, TN, 

May 28, 2008. 

TA–W–70,925; Troy Laminating and 

Coating, Inc., Chargeurs Protective 

Films, Leased Workers from 

Accoutemps, Troy, OH, June 1, 

2008. 

TA–W–70,997; Ross Mould, Inc., 

Washington, PA, May 29, 2008. 

TA–W–71,033; JessEM Tool Company, 

Leased Workers From Accuforce 

and Staffpro, Greeneville, TN, May 

19, 2008. 

TA–W–71,050; Xaloy, Inc., Pulaski, VA, 

June 2, 2008. 

TA–W–71,065; NOV Hydra Rig, Hydra 

Rig Nitrogen, National Oilwell 

Varco, Leased Workers from 

Express, Duncan, OK, June 5, 2008. 

TA–W–71,228; Kawneer North America, 

Building & Construction, Alcoa, 

Leased Workers from M&W 

Machine, Hernando, MS, June 15, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,272; Crucible Specialty 

Corporation, Syracuse, NY, June 16, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,339; A.R.E. Manufacturing, 

Inc., Leased Workers From 

Personnel Source, Newberg, OR, 

May 23, 2008. 

TA–W–71,498; Du Fresne 

Manufacturing Company, Leased 

Workers from Work Connection and 

Manpower, Vadnais Heights, MN, 

June 30, 2008. 

TA–W–71,807; B & C Machine 

Company, Barberton, OH, July 27, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,906; Flowserve US, Inc., Flow 

Control Div., Sulphur Springs, 

Texas Plant, Instaff Personnel, 

Sulphur Springs, TX, July 27, 2008. 

TA–W–72,065; Trinity Tank Carl, Inc., 

Plant #19, Longview, TX, July 21, 

2008. 

TA–W–72,271; Vincent Industrial 

Plastics, Inc., Henderson, KY, 

September 2, 2008. 

TA–W–70,986; Bally Sportswear, Inc., 

New York, NY, June 2, 2008. 

TA–W–71,055; Milliken and Company, 

Johnston, SC, May 19, 2008. 

TA–W–71,348; Rocky Fashion, Inc., New 

York, NY, June 22, 2008. 

TA–W–72,352; Roanoke Sportswear 

Company, Inc., Roanoke Rapids, 

NC, September 16, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

TA–W–70,511; Tecumseh Products 

Company, Leased Workers of 

Express Personnel, Verona, MS, 

May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,610; Solar World Industry 

Services, Vancouver, WA, May 21, 

2008. 

TA–W–70,780; Federal Mogul 

Corporation, Powertrain, Seals and 

Bearings Division, Blacksburg, VA, 

May 19, 2008. 

TA–W–70,936; ITW Ark-Les Connector 

BU, Illinois Tool Works, Inc., 

Stoughton, MA, June 1, 2008. 

TA–W–71,022; Sanyo Manufacturing 

Corporation, Sanyo Electric, Forrest 

City, AR, December 27, 2008. 

TA–W–71,177; Daimler Trucks North 

America LLC, Corporate 

Headquarters, Including Leased 

Workers, Portland, OR, June 9, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,344; B.W. Elliott 

Manufacturing Company, LLC, 

Leased Workers from Enterforce 

Eastern Temp Service and Adecco, 

Binghamton, NY, June 19, 2008. 

TA–W–71,424; SUMCO Phoenix 

Corporation, Leased Workers From 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices 7033 

The Job Store, Maineville, OH, June 

23, 2008. 

TA–W–71,441; Rule Industries, Inc., 

Coworx, Randstad and ARS 

Staffing, Gloucester, MA, June 23, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,453; Carling Technologies, 

Inc., Plainville, CT, June 26, 2008. 

TA–W–71,578; Shore to Shore, Inc., onSite Independent Contractor, 

Miamisburg, OH, June 26, 2008. 

TA–W–71,632; Talaris, Inc., Formerly 

De La Rue Cash Systems, Leased 

Workers of Kelly Services, 

Watertown, WI, July 9, 2008. 

TA–W–71,713; DCM Manufacturing, 

Leased Workers of Staff Mark, Regal 

Staffing and Staff Force, Haltom 

City, TX, July 16, 2008. 

TA–W–72,016; Surgrx, Inc, Leased 

Worker From ATR International, 

Connexion Systems & Engineering, 

Redwood City, CA, August 12, 2008. 

TA–W–72,025; Momentive Performance 

Materials USA, Waterford, NY, 

August 3, 2008. 

TA–W–72,044; Kaiser Aluminum 

Fabricated Products, LLC, Tulsa, 

OK, May 26, 2008. 

TA–W–72,202; Ideal Clamp Products, 

St. Augustine, FL, August 28, 2008. 

TA–W–72,211; Unisia Steering Systems, 

Inc., TRC Staff, Staff Right, Chase 

Staff, Intersect Group, Oakwood, 

GA, September 2, 2008. 

TA–W–72,227; EPIC Technologies, LLC, 

Leased Workers from Kelly Services, 

Norwalk, OH, May 15, 2009. 

TA–W–72,318; Grecon Dimter, Inc., 

Catawba Valley Staffing, Connelly 

Springs, NC, September 3, 2008. 

TA–W–72,424; Momentive Performance 

Materials, Inc., Willoughby, OH, 

September 25, 2008. 

TA–W–72,553; Intel Corporation, 

Technology Manufacturing Group/ 

Leased Workers of Abacus Service 

Corporation, Chandler, AZ, 

September 29, 2008. 

TA–W–72,564; Thermoseal, Inc., 

Sidney, OH, October 9, 2008. 

TA–W–72,596; Metso Minerals 

Industries, Inc., Metso Minerals 

Finland OY, Leased Workers from 

Employment Trends & Express, 

Portland, OR, October 13, 2008. 

TA–W–72,628; BASF Belvidere, Coating 

Division, Basf Corp., On-Site 

Independent Contractor, Belvidere, 

NJ, October 19, 2008. 

TA–W–72,648; Fisher and Paykel 

Laundry Manufacturing, Clyde, OH, 

October 12, 2008. 

TA–W–72,777; Caterpillar Inc., Building 

Construction Div., Backhoe 

Loaders, Clayton, NC, November 3, 

2008. 

TA–W–72,892; Bostik, Inc., A Subsidiary 

of Elf Aquitaine, Marshall, MI, 

November 18, 2008. 

TA–W–72,906; Sonetics Corporation, 

Firecom and Flightcom Div., Tigard, 

OR, November 12, 2008. 

TA–W–72,924; Heritage Aviation, LTD, 

Leased Workers from Global 

Technical Services, Grand Prairie, 

TX, November 20, 2008. 

TA–W–72,951; Alstom Transportation 

Electronic Systems, Inc., Triad, 

Williston, VT, November 24, 2008. 

TA–W–72,975; Pexco, LLC (FKA Filtrona 

Extrusion, Inc.), Leased Workers 

From ADD Staffing, Union Gap, 

WA, November 23, 2008. 

TA–W–72,978; Caterpillar, Inc., Large 

Power Systems Division, Cast 

Metals Organization, Mapleton, IL, 

November 3, 2008. 

TA–W–72,985; Brantly Helicopter, Inc., 

Vernon, TX, November 30, 2008. 

TA–W–71,119; Hunter Douglas, 

Northwest Division, Renton, WA, 

June 5, 2008. 

TA–W–71,258; UPM Raflatac, Inc., 

Leased Workers from Manpower 

and Onesource, Wilkes-Barre, PA, 

June 16, 2008. 

TA–W–71,357; Moyno, Inc., Fluid 

Management Group, Robbins & 

Myers, Leased Workers of Express 

Temporary, Springfield, OH, June 

15, 2008. 

TA–W–72,095; The Store Kraft 

Manufacturing Company, Leased 

Workers from Advance Services and 

Staffing Services, Beatrice, NE, 

August 18, 2008. 

TA–W–72,721; Arquest, Inc., ESA 

Staffing, Camden, AR, October 30, 

2008. 

TA–W–73,019; Hunter Technology 

Corporation, Leased Workers from 

Advanced Technical Resources etc., 

Santa Clara, CA, December 2, 2008. 

TA–W–70,677; SPI America, LLC, 

Healthcare Division/Leased 

Workers of Mt. Matchmaker, 

Nashville, TN, May 19, 2008. 

TA–W–70,750; Martinair, Martinair 

Holland, N.V., Dora, FL, May 28, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,121; Albion Associates Inc., 

Personnel Center and Independent 

Contractors, High Point, NC, June 2, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,449; The Nielsen Company, 

Features Coding Department, 

Leased Workers from Adecco 

Staffing, Omaha, NE, June 19, 2008. 

TA–W–71,461; Arrow Electronics, Inc., 

Corporate Information Technology 

Dept., Leased Workers from Adecco 

Employment, Melville, NY, June 29, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,506; ExxonMobil Chemical 

Company, Specialty Elastomers 

Division/Leased Workers of 

Manpower and Comsys, Akron, OH, 

June 25, 2008. 

TA–W–71,809; Keane, Inc., L–2 

Technical Support, Working at 

Pfizer, In Morris Plains, NJ, Boston, 

MA, July 27, 2008. 

TA–W–71,935; Bank of America, Global 

Treasury Operations U.S. Wire, 

Leased Workers Robert Half 

International, Concord, CA, August 

3, 2008. 

TA–W–71,971; Knaack LLC, Customer 

Service Dept., Aerotek, Crystal 

Lake, IL, August 4, 2008. 

TA–W–72,079; GM LAAM Holding, LLC, 

Latin America, Africa and Middle 

East, Leased Workers of Securitas, 

EDS, Miramar, FL, August 6, 2008. 

TA–W–72,081; GE Healthcare IITS USA 

Corp, Global Engineering Dept., 

General Electric Company, 

Barrington, IL, August 3, 2008. 

TA–W–72,291; EDS, An HP Company, 

Hewlett-Packard Company, Detroit, 

MI, September 11, 2008. 

TA–W–72,344; Keane, Inc., Keane 

International, Inc., Syracuse, NY, 

September 9, 2008. 

TA–W–72,405; Cadmus Journal 

Services, Inc., Cenveo Corp., 

Columbus, OH, September 24, 2008. 

TA–W–72,482; GemStone Systems, Inc., 

Leased Workers from BOCCI Design, 

Beaverton, OR, October 1, 2008. 

TA–W–72,543; Owens Corning Sales, 

LLC, Leased Workers of Kelly 

Services, Charleston, WV, October 

8, 2008. 

TA–W–72,731; Metropolitan Life 

Insurance Company, Leased 

Workers from Adecco, Johnstown, 

PA, October 29, 2008. 

TA–W–72,925; Honeywell Security and 

Communications, Honeywell 

Security Division, Honeywell 

International, Folsom, CA, 

November 20, 2008. 

TA–W–72,995; Travelport Operations, 

Inc., Corporate Headquarters, 

Parsippany, NJ, November 24, 2008. 

TA–W–73,007; Perot Systems 

Corporation, Dell Perot Systems, 

Healthcare Business Unit, Leased 

Workers AP Professionals, Phoenix, 

AZ, December 1, 2008. 

TA–W–70,857A; DHL Global 

Forwarding, DP DHL, Finance & 

Accounting Div., Manpower, 

Randstad, Irving, TX, June 1, 2008. 

TA–W–70,857B; DHL Global 

Forwarding, DP DHL, Finance & 

Accounting Div., Phoenix, AZ, June 

1, 2008. 

TA–W–70,857C; DHL Global 

Forwarding, DP DHL, Finance & 

Accounting Div., Manpower, 

Randstad, Houston, TX, June 1, 

2008. 

TA–W–70,857D; DHL Global 

Forwarding, DP DHL, Finance & 

Accounting Div., Renton, WA, June 

1, 2008. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
7034 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices 

TA–W–70,857; DHL Global Forwarding, 

DP DHL, Finance and Accounting 

Division, Plantation, FL, June 1, 

2008. 

TA–W–72,431A; Matthew Bender and 

Company, Inc., d/b/a Lexisnexis, 

Corporate Accounting Division, 

Reed Elsevier, Miamisburg, OH, 

September 28, 2008. 

TA–W–72,431B; Matthew Bender and 

Company, Inc., d/b/a Lexisnexis, 

Corporate Accounting Division, 

Reed Elsevier, New Providence, NJ, 

September 28, 2008. 

TA–W–72,431C; Matthew Bender and 

Company, Inc., d/b/a Lexisnexis, 

Corporate Accounting Division, 

Reed Elsevier, Bellevue, WA, 

September 28, 2008. 

TA–W–72,431; Matthew Bender and 

Company, Inc., d/b/a Lexisnexis, 

Corporate Accounting Division, 

Reed Elsevier, Albany, NY, 

September 28, 2008. 

TA–W–72,620; Brand Science, LLC, 

Dandridge, TN, October 19, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (adversely affected workers in 

public agencies) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–70,365; Bell Engineering, 

Incorporated, Saginaw, MI, May 19, 

2008. 

TA–W–70,417; Milliken and Company, 

Automotive Division, Sharon Plant, 

Abbeville, SC, May 19, 2008. 

TA–W–70,425; UGN, Inc., Leased 

Workers of Hamilton-Ryker 

Company and Manpower, Jackson, 

TN, May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,490A; Bright Wood 

Corporation, Redmond, OR, May 

20, 2008. 

TA–W–70,490; Bright Wood 

Corporation, Madras, OR, May 20, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,040; United States Steel, 

Granite City Works Division, 

Granite City, IL, June 5, 2008. 

TA–W–71,063; Precision Compacted 

Components, Inc., Wilcox, PA, June 

5, 2008. 

TA–W–71,210; Grede Foundries, Inc., 

Leased Workers From Emerald City 

Staffing, Greenwood, SC, June 12, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,455; Citation Corporation— 

Citation Wisconsin Casting, 

Iroquois Foundry Corp., Leased 

Workers of Corporate Development, 

Browntown, WI, June 26, 2008. 

TA–W–71,464; A and L Lumber 

Company, Tryon, NC, June 22, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,617; Tube City IMS, LLC, 

Tube City IMS Corporation, Granite 

City, IL, July 8, 2008. 

TA–W–71,788; Kelly Hosiery Mill, Inc., 

Hickory, NC, July 22, 2008. 

TA–W–71,999; Leigh Fibers, Inc., Leased 

Workers from Human Technologies, 

Inc., Wellford, SC, August 11, 2008. 

TA–W–70,161; Kelsey-Hayes Company, 

Subsidiary of TRW Automotive, 

Inc., Parts & Serv., Wixom, MI, May 

18, 2008. 

TA–W–72,011; General Electric 

Lexington Glass Plant, Lighting LLC, 

Leased Workers of The Patty Tipton 

& Aetna Building Maintenance, 

Lexington, KY, July 14, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

TA–W–70,837; Harco Manufacturing 

Group, LLC, Harco Brake Systems 

Division, Harco Industries Division, 

Moraine, OH, May 27, 2008. 

TA–W–72,764; International Paper 

Company, Franklin Pulp and Paper 

Mill, Franklin, VA, November 3, 

2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(f) (firms identified by the 

International Trade Commission) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–70,856; IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., 

Camanche, IA, July 15, 2007. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or 

(b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or 

threat of separation) of section 222 has 

not been met. 

TA–W–71,147; NNR Global Logistics 

USA, Inc, Minneapolis Branch, 

Eagan, MN. 

TA–W–71,277; Carson Industries, Inc., 

Freeport, PA. 

TA–W–72,942; V and W Packaging, 

Hickory, NC. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) 

(decline in sales or production, or both) 

and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services to a foreign country) of section 

222 have not been met. 

TA–W–72,142; Drake Manufacturing 

Services, Inc., Warren, OH. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

TA–W–70,099; Equipment Services, Inc., 

Snap-On Equipment, Leased 

Workers Manpower and Staffmark, 

Conway, AZ. 

TA–W–70,175; Riddle Laminators, 

Riddle, OR. 

TA–W–70,262; Autonation, Libertyville 

Toyota Division, Libertyville, IL. 

TA–W–70,461; S and S Fire Apparatus, 

Fairmount, IN. 

TA–W–70,503; R and R Donnelley, Long 

Prairie, MN. 

TA–W–70,599; Innovion Corporation, 

Gresham, OR. 

TA–W–70,721; GrafTech International 

Holdings, Inc, Lawrenceburg, TN. 

TA–W–70,727; North Bergen Piece Dye 

Works, Inc., North Bergen, NJ. 

TA–W–70,749; Fanuc Robotics America, 

Inc., Leased Workers from Right 

Angle Staffing, Inc., Quanta, Inc., 

Rochester Hills, MI. 

TA–W–70,760; Ridge Tool Company, 

Division of Emerson Electric, Elyria, 

OH. 

TA–W–71,027; Garsite/Progess LLC, dba 

Progress Tank, Walker Group 

Holdings, Arthur, IL. 

TA–W–71,128; HPG International, Inc., 

Mountain Top, PA. 

TA–W–71,214; Color-Fi, Sumter, SC. 

TA–W–71,299; Polymer Division, JD, 

Inc., Johnson Diversey, Sturtevant, 

WI. 

TA–W–71,360; Monarch Industries, Inc., 

Waterbury, CT. 

TA–W–71,365; Heartland Companies, 

Ltd, San Francisco, CA. 

TA–W–71,463; Freedom Plastics, Inc., 

Leased Workers from Serviant, 

Janesville, WI. 

TA–W–71,543; Wesley Hall Furniture, 

Inc., Hickory, NC. 

TA–W–71,556; North River Boats, Inc., 

Roseburg, OR. 

TA–W–71,701; Key Gas Components, 

Marion, NC. 

TA–W–71,951; Mack Trucks, Inc., 

Macungie Assembly Division, 

Macungie, PA. 

TA–W–72,293; Bennington Furniture, 

Inc., Sharpsville, PA. 

TA–W–72,317; Phaztech, Inc., St. 

Mary’s, PA. 

TA–W–70,330; Siemens Product Life 

Cycle Management Software, Inc., 

Subsidiary of Siemens Industry 

Holdings, USG Capital Corporation, 

Troy, MI. 

TA–W–70,601; Ceda-Pine Veneer, Inc., 

Excaliber, Inc., Sandpoint, ID. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices 7035 

TA–W–70,665; DuPont Marshall 

Laboratory, Dupont Performance 

Coastings Division, Dupont 

Company, Philadelphia, PA. 

TA–W–71,511; Jeld-Wen, Inc., 

Engineering Division, Klamath 

Falls, OR. 

TA–W–71,608; Xilinx, Inc., 

Albuquerque, NM, 

TA–W–71,948; Solutions 

Manufacturing, Inc., Rockledge, FL. 

TA–W–72,131; Phillips Van Heusen 

Corporation, Logistics Services 

Division, Schuylkill Haven, PA. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (b)(2) and 

(b)(3) (public agency acquisition of 

services from a foreign country) of 

section 222 have not been met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(c)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a Supplier to or a Downstream 

Producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified as eligible to apply for TAA. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of December 14 

through December 31, 2009. Copies of 

these determinations are available for 

inspection in Room N–5428, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 

during normal business hours or will be 

mailed to persons who write to the 

above address. 

Dated: February 1, 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3004 Filed 2–12–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of January 1 through 

January 15, 2010. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES