alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TREY D. MAXTON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5808-LC-HTC

OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD

OF COMMISSIONERS,

CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and

MCCORMICK,

Defendants.

______________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on November 6,

2020 (ECF No. 5). Efforts were made to furnish plaintiff a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and afford him an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). All mail was returned as “not

deliverable and unable to forward.” No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-05808-LC-HTC Document 7 Filed 12/11/20 Page 1 of 2
2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to

prosecute and failure to comply with Court orders.

3. The clerk is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of December, 2020.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv5808-LC-HTC

Case 3:20-cv-05808-LC-HTC Document 7 Filed 12/11/20 Page 2 of 2
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000498 31-JAN-2018 09:15 AM
# L_2021389EN.01000901.xml

| 4.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 389/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 389/9

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/1914

of 28 October 2021

conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Île-de-France’ (PGI)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Île-de-France’ forwarded by France and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Île-de-France’ forwarded by France and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Île-de-France’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Île-de-France’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Île-de-France’ (PGI) is hereby protected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2021.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 290, 20.7.2021, p. 20.

2

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joshua Pomerantz, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated August 30, 1979, which, upon adjudging him to be guilty of criminal contempt of court, (1) committed him to the Department of Correction for a 30-day term and (2) imposed a $250 fine or, in lieu of payment thereof, committed him to the department for an additional 30-day term. Order modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by adding thereto a provision that the term of imprisonment shall run concurrently with defendant’s indeterminate term of imprisonment imposed for his prior perjury conviction. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The record reveals that Criminal Term intended that any term of imprisonment for criminal contempt run concurrently with, rather than consecutively to, the prior sentence. That discretionary determination required a specification in the order to that effect; otherwise, the order’s silence on this point would result in a consecutive sentence (see Penal Law, § 10.00, subds 1, 4; § 55.10, subd 2, par [c]; § 70.15, subd 3; § 70.25, subd 1, par [b]). We have examined defendant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Rabin, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2572 

To amend the Aviation and Transportation Security Act to extend the 

suspended service ticket honor requirement. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Mr. BURNS (for himself and Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Aviation and Transportation Security Act 

to extend the suspended service ticket honor requirement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aviation Consumer 

5 Protection Extension Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF REQUIREMENT FOR AIR CARRIERS 

7 TO HONOR TICKETS FOR SUSPENDED AIR 

8 PASSENGER SERVICE. 

9 Section 145(c) of the Aviation and Transportation 

10 Security Act (49 U.S.C. 40101 note) is amended by strikVerDate Aug 31 2005 17:46 Apr 13, 2006 Jkt 049196 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2572.IS S2572

dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

S 2572 IS

1 ing ‘‘November 19, 2005.’’ and inserting ‘‘November 30, 

2 2007.’’. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
#### § 51.892 Color terms.

The color terms *well colored, reasonably well colored,* and *fairly well colored* are defined in Table IV.

Table IV

| Color terms | Black varieties | Red varieties | White varieties |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Well colored (U.S. Extra Fancy) | Each bunch shall have not less than 95 percent, by count, of berries showing good characteristic color.1 | Each bunch shall have not less than 75 percent, by count, of berries showing good characteristic color.1 | No requirement. |
| Reasonably well colored (U.S. Fancy) | Each bunch shall have not less than 85 percent, by count, of berries showing good characteristic color.1 | Each bunch shall have not less than 662/3 percent, by count, of berries showing good characteristic color1 except the Tokay and Cardinal varieties shall have not less than 75 percent, by count, of berries showing characteristic color.2 | No requirement. |
| Fairly well colored (U.S. No. 1) | Each bunch shall have not less than 75 percent, by count, of berries showing characteristic color.2 | Each bunch shall have not less than 60 percent, by count, of berries showing characteristic color.2 | No requirement. |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Good characteristic color for black varieties means purple to black except that Ribier or similar varieties of grapes shall have at least two-thirds of the surface of the berry showing purple to black color. | | | |
| For red varieties good characteristic color means at least two-thirds of the surface of the berry is light red through dark red color; except, for the Tokay variety pink through dark red, and for the Cardinal variety light red through purple shall be permitted. | | | |
| 2 Characteristic color for black varieties means reddish-purple to black except that Ribier or similar varieties of grapes shall have at least two-thirds of the surface of the berry showing reddish-purple to black color. | | | |
| For red varieties characteristic color means at least two-thirds of the surface of the berry is pink to dark red; except, for the Tokay variety light pink through dark red and for the Cardinal variety light pink through purple color shall be permitted. | | | |

[[36 FR 9126](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/36-FR-9126), May 20, 1971. Redesignated at [42 FR 32514](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/42-FR-32514), June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at [46 FR 63203](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/46-FR-63203), Dec. 31, 1981. Redesignated at [56 FR 15802](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/56-FR-15802), Apr. 18, 1991]
§ 3701.4 Multitrack processing. ( a ) When ERS has a significant number of requests, the nature of which precludes a determination within 20 working days, the requests may be processed in a multitrack processing system, based on the date of receipt, the amount of work and time involved in processing the request, and whether the request qualifies for expedited processing.
( b ) ERS may establish as many processing tracks as appropriate; processing within each track shall be based on a first-in, first-out concept, and rank-ordered by the date of receipt of the request.
( c ) A requester whose request does not qualify for the fastest track may be given an opportunity to limit the scope of the request in order to qualify for the fastest track. This multitrack processing system does not lessen agency responsibility to exercise due diligence in processing requests in the most expeditious manner possible.
( d ) ERS shall process requests in each track on a “first-in, first-out” basis, unless there are unusual circumstances as set forth in § 1.16 of this title, or the requester is entitled to expedited processing as set forth in § 1.9 of this title.
#### § 29.1069 Type.

A division of a class of tobacco having certain common characteristics and closely related grades. Tobacco which has the same characteristics and corresponding qualities, colors, and lengths is classified as one type, regardless of any factors of historical or geographical nature which cannot be determined by an examination of the tobacco.

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated at 47 FR 51721, Nov. 17, 1982, 48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983, 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
Exhibit 23







            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
    333-79979 on Form S-8 of National Bankshares, Inc. of our report dated
    February 23, 2007 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial
    statements and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in
    this Annual Report on Form 10-K of National Bankshares, Inc. for the year
    ended December 31, 2006.

    /s/ Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C.
    -------------------------------
    Winchester, Virginia
    March 14, 2007
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amalgamated Pictures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: November 7, 2008

| /s/ Avery Pack                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| Avery Pack, President and          Chief Executive Officer          (Principal Executive Officer) and          Acting Chief Financial Officer          (Principal Financial Officer and          Principal Accounting Officer) |
1

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-1339

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * District of Nebraska.

*

Serafin Lopez-Flores, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED] 

Antonio Lopez, *

 * 

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: September 13, 2005

Filed: September 21, 2005

___________

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Serafin Lopez-Flores appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1

 upon

him claiming error for overstating his criminal history. He also contends the district

court impermissibly relied upon the Sentencing Guidelines and the ultimate sentence

was higher than necessary to achieve the sentencing purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

(West 2005).
-2-

Lopez-Flores agreed with the district court’s assessment of his criminal history

category under the Guidelines, but asked for a downward departure from that

category. (See Tr. at 5.) The district court was aware of its authority to depart from

the Guidelines. (Id. at 7-9, 17.) There being no unconstitutional motive for the lack

of departure alleged, the district court’s failure to depart is not reviewable. United

States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 335 F.3d 793, 799 (8th Cir. 2003).

Lopez-Flores argues the district court impermissibly relied upon the Sentencing

Guidelines in violation of United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). However,

the district court made clear it recognized the advisory nature of the Sentencing

Guidelines and considered the factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). (Tr. at 19.)

Accordingly, the district court committed no Booker error.

In light of the offense level, criminal history category, nature and

circumstances of the offense, history of Lopez-Flores, and the other factors

enumerated in § 3553(a) and United States v. Adams, 401 F.3d 886, 895 (8th Cir.

2005), this Court concludes the sentence imposed by the district court is in all aspects

reasonable.

We therefore affirm the district court.

______________________________
Case 3:97-cr-00064-RV Document 217 Filed 09/22/05 Page 1 of 1
36.517 Layout of work.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-17, Layout of Work, in solicitations and

contracts when a fixed-price construction contract is contemplated and use of this clause is

appropriate due to a need for accurate work layout and for siting verification during work

performance.

Parent topic: Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
#### § 54.1024 Who shall perform appeal service.

Appeal service for equipment or utensils shall be performed by the Chief or a design review specialist designated by the Chief. No design review specialist may perform appeal service for any piece of equipment, portion of a piece of equipment or utensil for which the original design review specialist performed the initial evaluation service.
- /app03/pdfs/497cv/002/12/8417t/00063001.TIF
- /app03/pdfs/497cv/002/12/8417t/00063002.TIF
- /app03/pdfs/497cv/002/12/8417t/00063003.TIF
- /app03/pdfs/497cv/002/12/8417t/00063004.TIF
- /app03/pdfs/497cv/002/12/8417t/00063005.TIF
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2479 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2479

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain Tetramethylthiuram 
                               Disulfide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2006

  Mr. DeWine (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain Tetramethylthiuram 
                               Disulfide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN TETRAMETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.04       Tetramethylthiura  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         m Disulfide (CAS                                                   31/2009
                         No. 137-26-8)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2930.30.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2006-0989.

#### State ex rel. Brown v. Bernard.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion to expedite a ruling on the issuance of an alternative writ of prohibition,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.
47.104-2 Fixed-price contracts.

(a) F.o.b. destination. 49 U.S.C. 10721 and 1 3712 rates do not apply to shipments under fixed-price

f.o.b. destination contracts (delivered price).

(b) F.o.b. origin. If it is advantageous to the Government, the contracting officer may occasionally

require the contractor to prepay the freight charges to a specific destination. In such cases, the

contractor shall use a commercial bill of lading and be reimbursed for the direct and actual

transportation cost as a separate item in the invoice. The clause at 52.247-1, Commercial Bill of

Lading Notations, will ensure that the Government in this type of arrangement obtains the benefit of

49 U.S.C. 10721 and 1 3712 rates.

Parent topic: 47.104 Government rate tenders under sections 10721 and 13712 of the Interstate

Commerce Act (49 U.S.C. 10721 and 13712).
Amendment to Client Contract



 Exhibit 10.26 
  
  
 Amendment to Client Contract 
  
  
 Amendment dated July 1st, 2008, to the Client Contract between GMAC Bank, a Utah industrial bank (“GMACB” as “Purchaser”) and GMAC Mortgage, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“GMACM”)
(“Client”) dated February 8, 2008 (“Client Contract”). 
 1. All terms and conditions as set forth in the
Client Contract and the GMAC Bank Correspondent Manual (as amended, supplemented or replaced, the “Correspondent Manual”) shall remain in full force and effect unless specifically changed, altered or modified by this Amendment. 

2. The following paragraph will be added to the Client Contract as paragraph #22: 
 “GMACB and Client intend that the sale of the Loans and/or mortgage loans by Client to GMACB pursuant to the Client Contract be construed as a sale
by the Client to GMACB. Further, it is not intended that any such conveyance be deemed to be a pledge of the Loans and/or mortgage loans by Client to GMACB to secure a debt or other obligation of Client. However, in the event that the
Loans and/or mortgage loans are held to be property of the Client, or if for any reason the Client Contract is held or deemed to create a security interest in the Loans or mortgage loans, then it is intended that (a) the Client Contract shall
also be deemed to be a security agreement within the meaning of the Uniform Commercial Code, (b) the conveyances provided for in the Client Contract shall be deemed to be a grant by Client to GMACB of a security interest in all of Client's
right (including the power to convey title thereto), title and interest, whether now owned or hereafter acquired, in and to the Loans and/or mortgage loans and all rights and documents related thereto, including without limitation the note, the
mortgage, the servicing rights, and any and all related general intangibles, payment intangibles, accounts, chattel paper, instruments, documents, money, deposit accounts, certificates of deposit, goods, letters of credit, and any other property of
whatever kind or description now existing or hereafter acquired consisting of, arising from or relating to any of the foregoing and all proceeds of the forgoing.
 Client authorizes GMACB to file financing statements, including without limitation, amendments and continuations, with respect to the above-described property.” 
 3. Any capitalized term used in this Amendment that is not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Client Guide. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Client’s and GMACB’s duly authorized officers have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. 

CLIENT: 
  

									
	GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC	 		 	GMAC BANK
					
	By:	 	 /s/ James N. Young
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Robert E. Groody

	Name:	 	 James N. Young
	 		 	Name:	 	 Robert E. Groody

		 	(Typed or Printed)	 		 		 	(Typed or Printed)
	Title:	 	 Chief Financial Officer
	 		 	Title:	 	 EVP & Chief Operating Officer


  

 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 0- 0221 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GARY WAYNE TEMPLE, JR. ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 19, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 14 2021

10/14/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0221
#### § 51.709 Misshapen.

*Misshapen* means that the fruit is decidedly elongated, pointed or flatsided.