alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CURTIS HALL, 

Petitioner, 

v. Case No.: 4:20cv444-MW/MAF 

SECRETARY, FLORIDA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Respondent. 

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 23. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation, ECF No. 23, is accepted and adopted as 

this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Petitioner’s second 

amended § 2254 petition, ECF No. 9, is DISMISSED as untimely.” A certificate of 

appealability is DENIED and leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. The 

Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on July 8, 2022. 

s/Mark E. Walker ____

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00444-MW-MAF Document 24 Filed 07/08/22 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2555 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2555

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, as the ``Lane Evans Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANE EVANS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lane Evans Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lane Evans 
Post Office Building''.

            Passed the Senate August 2, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2555

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, as the ``Lane Evans Post 
                           Office Building''.
```
§ 4280.149 Applicant eligibility. To be eligible for an EA grant or a REDA grant under this subpart, the applicant must meet each of the criteria, as applicable, specified in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section. The Agency will determine an applicant's eligibility. ( a ) The applicant must be one of the following: ( 1 ) A unit of State, Tribal, or local government;
( 2 ) A land-grant college or university, or other institution of higher education;
( 3 ) A rural electric cooperative;
( 4 ) A public power entity;
( 5 ) An instrumentality of a State, Tribal, or local government; or
( 6 ) A council, as defined under the Resource Conservation and Development Program, at 16 U.S. C. 3451.
( b ) The applicant must have sufficient capacity to perform the EA or REDA activities proposed in the application to ensure success. The Agency will make this assessment based on the information provided in the application.
( c ) The applicant must have the legal authority necessary to apply for and carry out the purpose of the grant.
( d ) The applicant must: ( 1 ) Be registered in the SAM prior to submitting an application;
( 2 ) Maintain an active SAM registration with current information at all times until final fund disbursement has been made.
( 3 ) Provide its UEI number in each application it submits to the Agency. Generally, the UEI number is included on SF-424.
### ~

### <:J~: 

## EE-g.ysTD -00-/00 

# 7

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

+ + + +



### PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT: EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL HVAC AND WATER HEATING PRODUCTS

+ + + +



### TUESDAY, JULY 11, 2000

The workshop was held in Room IE-245 of

the James Forrestal Building, Department of Energy,

1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. at

9:30 a.m., DOUGLAS BROOKMAN of· Public Solutions
moderating.

PRESENT:

DOUGLAS BROOKMAN, Moderator GARY AMICK KARIM AMRANE ED BARBOUR TIMOTHY BEDEAUX DAVID BELZER DAVID BIXBY JOHN F. BUSCH, JR., Ph.D. TOM CARR SACHU CONSTANTINE J. E. COX, P.E., Ph.D. STUART DOIS MICHAEL J. DORE, JR. JAMES P. GARVIN JASON GLAZER, P.E. RAOUF GREISS

WILBUR L. HAAG, JR.

TIMOTHY HAWKINS JOHN A. HODGES J. BARDFORD HOLLOMON Public Solutions, Inc. Slant/Fin Corporation ARI Arthur D. Little Burnham Corporation PNNL GAMA 

### LBNL Lennox Industries Alliance to Save Energy ASHRAE NIST Weil-McLain ARI GRD Analytics, Inc. Natural Resources Canada A. 

## o. SmithWater Products Rheem Manufacturing ARI PNNL

NEALR.GROSS

(202)234-4433 COURTREPORTERSANDTRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODEISLANDAVE., N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.comPRESENT (Continued):

JILL C. HOOTMAN MARK KENDALL B. 

### J. KUMAR STANLEY T. LIU GREGORY A. LUNCH R. MICHAEL MARTIN

JOSEPH M. MATTINGLY MARK MENZER JOHN MILES

FRANK MYERS STEVE NADEL

DAVID NOYES HUNG M. PHAM JAMES RANFONE WAYNE REEDY C. KEITH RICE, Ph.D.

NEIL ROLPH STEVEN ROSENSTOCK

JOEL SOLIS SRlRAM SOMASUNDARAM LARRY SPIELVOGEL FRANK STANONIK CHARLES STEPHENS BODH R. SUBHERWAL STEPHEN J. TREADO KELLEY D. TRONCALLI

WILLIAM F. WALTER DAVID WINIARSKI

DOE STAFF: PAUL ADAMS BRIAN BERRINGER BRENDA EDWARDS-JONES QONNIE LAUGHLIN EDWARD LEVY MICHAEL E. McCABE MICHAEL J. McCABE CYRUS NASSERI FRANCINE PINTO EDWARD POLLOCK 

### EE-RM/STD.QO.100

The Trane Company Arthur

## o. Little Energetics NIST Goodman-Amana California Energy Commission GAMA ARI Enviromaster International 2

PVI Industries, Inc. American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy Peerless Heater Company Copeland Corporation AGA Carrier Oak Ridge National Laboratory Weil-McLain Edison Electric Institute ARI PNNL ASHRAE GAMA Oregon BR Lab NIST International Comfort Products Carrier Corporation PNNL

NEAL

### R.GROSS

(202)234-4433 COURTREPORTERSANDTRANSCRIBERS 1323RHODEISLANDAVE., N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com
§ 4280.30 Restrictions on the use of REDL or REDG funds. ( a ) *Conflict of interest.* The Intermediary must not own or manage any Ultimate Recipient Project, unless the Project is acquired as a result of servicing a loan made from the Revolving Loan Fund. Conflicts of interest and all appearances of a conflict of interest are not permitted. The intermediary must also disclose in writing any potential conflicts of interest to the USDA awarding agency and maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest, including organizational conflicts of interest in accordance with 2 CFR 400.2(b).
( b ) *Fees.* The Intermediary may charge reasonable loan servicing fees, which are limited to one percent per year of the principal amount outstanding on the loan; reasonable professional service fees that are customary for the service being provided and in accordance with any standard fee schedules that have been established for the service; and reasonable expenses the Intermediary has incurred from Independent Providers.
( c ) *Interest earnings.* Any interest earned by the Intermediary on advances of Rural Development REDG or REDL funds prior to the disbursement for the Project, must be returned to Rural Development.
[72 FR 29843, May 30, 2007, as amended at 79 FR 76015, Dec. 19, 2014]
**EXHIBIT 32.1****SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     I, Ronald W. Hovsepian, Chief Executive Officer of Novell, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), hereby certify that, to my knowledge: (1) The Company’s periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2007 (the“Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.* * *   CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     /s/ RONALD W. HOVSEPIAN Ronald W. Hovsepian  Date: May 25, 2007
§ 58.344 Storage of finished product in freezer. ( a ) *Sharp freezers.* Plastic cream or frozen cream intended for storage shall be placed in quick freezer rooms immediately after packaging, for rapid and complete freezing within 24 hours. The packages shall be piled or spaced in such a manner that air can freely circulate between and around the packages. The rooms shall be maintained at −10 °F. or lower and shall be equipped to provide sufficient high velocity, air circulation for rapid freezing. After the products have been completely frozen, they may be transferred to a freezer storage room for continued storage.
( b ) *Freezer storage.* The room shall be maintained at a temperature of 0 °F. or lower. Adequate air circulation is desirable.
Butter intended to be held more than 30 days shall be placed in a freezer room as soon as possible after packaging. If not frozen before being placed in the freezer, the packages shall be spaced in such a manner as to permit rapid freezing and repiled, if necessary, at a later time.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
ANDIS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1058
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3524
<ALLOWANCES>                                       208
<INVENTORY>                                        667
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6420
<PP&E>                                             251
<DEPRECIATION>                                      13
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    8546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4305
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             1803
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            30
<OTHER-SE>                                        2408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      8546
<SALES>                                          14787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14787
<CGS>                                            14441
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    32
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (269)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (269)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (269)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.10)


</TABLE>
# 9.206 Acquisitions subject to qualification requirements.

- 9.206-1 General. 
- 9.206-2 Contract clause. 
- 9.206-3 Competition. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 9.2 - Qualifications Requirements
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:03-CR-061-SPM

MELVIN MARTIN,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER DISCHARGING COUNSEL AND APPOINTING NEW

CJA COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Request for Inquiry” (doc.

18) filed June 21, 2005. At a hearing on the motion, the Court heard from both

Defendant and his counsel and found that the motion to withdraw should be

granted and that new counsel should be appointed for Defendant. The Office of

the Public Defender has provided the name of a CJA attorney willing and able to

take on this case. For good cause shown, it is therefore

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The motion to withdraw/notice of inquiry (doc. 18) is hereby granted

and Randy Murrell is hereby discharged from this case.

2. Gary Lee Printy, 1804 Miccosukee Commons Drive, Suite 200,

Tallahassee, FL 32308, (850) 877-7299, a member in good

Case 4:03-cr-00061-MW-CAS Document 21 Filed 07/06/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

standing of the Florida Bar and the Northern District of Florida Bar,

is hereby appointed to represent Defendant.

3. Trial has been set for Monday, July 18, 2005 at the United States

Courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida.

DONE AND ORDERED this sixth day of July, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

/pao

Case 4:03-cr-00061-MW-CAS Document 21 Filed 07/06/05 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,305]


Shorewood Packaging; a Business Unit of International Paper; 
Springfield, OR; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding 
Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated January 14, 2010, the petitioner requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 
applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The 
determination was issued on December 11, 2009. The Notice of 
Determination was published in the Federal Register on January 25, 2010 
(75 FR 3932).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that imports of paperboard packaging and like or 
directly competitive products did not contribute importantly to workers 
separations at the subject firm and no shift in production occurred 
during the relevant period.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided 
additional information and alleged that Shorewood Packaging shifted 
production from the subject facility abroad.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of January 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-3011 Filed 2-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### § 58.224 Sifters.

All newly installed sifters used for dry milk and dry milk products shall comply with the 3-A Sanitary Standards for Sifters for Dry Milk and Dry Milk Products. All other sifters shall be constructed of stainless steel or other equally noncorrosive material and shall be of sanitary construction and accessible for cleaning and inspection. The mesh size of sifter screen used for various dry dairy products shall be those recommended in the appendix of the 3-A Standard for sifters.
#### DATE, Respondent, v. NEW YORK GLUCOSE CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 5, 1906.)

Action by Albert Henry Date against the New York Glucose Company.

No opinion. Motion to resettle order granted.
#### § 503.10 Photographs for news, advertising, commercial purposes or for personal use.

Photographs on the PIADC for news, advertising, commercial purposes, or personal use may be taken only with prior written permission of Director, PIADC.
EXHIBIT 99.1

            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



         I, Jack L. Messman, Chief Executive Officer of Novell, Inc., a Delaware
         corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

         (1)      The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period
                  ended July 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                      * * *

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



/s/ Jack L. Messman
Jack L. Messman

Date: September 12, 2003


<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 99.2

            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



         I, Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Novell, Inc., a
         Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

         (1)      The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period
                  ended July 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                      * * *

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



/s/ Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr.
-------------------------------------------
Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr.

Date: September 12, 2003
§ 51.2284 Size classification. The following classifications are provided to describe the size of any lot: “Halves”, “Pieces and Halves”, “Pieces” or “Small Pieces”. The size of portions of kernels in the lot shall conform to the requirements of the specified classification as defined below: ( a ) *Halves.* Lot consists of 85 percent or more, by weight, half kernels, and the remainder three-fourths half kernels. (See § 51.2285.)
( b ) *Pieces and halves.* Lot consists of 20 percent or more, by weight, half kernels, and the remainder portions of kernels that cannot pass through a sieve with 24 ⁄ 64 inch round openings. When a lot exceeds this minimum requirement, the actual percentage of halves may be specified. (See § 51.2285.)
( c ) *Pieces.* Lot consists of portions of kernels that cannot pass through a sieve with 24 ⁄ 64 inch round openings. (See § 51.2285.)
( d ) *Small pieces.* Lot consists of portions of kernels that pass through a sieve with 24 ⁄ 64 inch round openings, but that cannot pass through a sieve with 8 ⁄ 64 inch round openings. When desired, the actual size ranges within such size ranges may be specified. (See § 51.2285.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Monk, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 8,1978, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Although not a model, the trial court’s charge on the issue of causation, to which no exception was taken at trial, was sufficient and violated none of defendant’s rights (see *People v Stewart,*40 NY2d 692). Titone, J. P., Gibbons, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
§ 51.2852 Serious damage. *Serious damage* means any specific defect described in this section; or any equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which seriously detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the onions. The following specific defects shall be considered as serious damage: ( a ) Watery scales when more than the equivalent of two entire outer fleshy scales are affected by an off-colored, watersoaked condition. The off-color must be of some shade of brown or yellow;
( b ) Dirt, staining or other foreign matter when more than 25 percent of the onions in a lot are badly stained. Onions with adhering dirt or other foreign matter shall be judged on the same basis as stained onions;
( c ) Seedstems when more than 1 ⁄ 2 inch in diameter;
( d ) Sprouts when the visible length is more than 1 ⁄ 2 inch;
( e ) Mechanical when any cut extends deeper than two fleshy scales, or when cuts seriously damage the appearance of the onion; and,
( f ) Dry sunken areas when extending deeper than one fleshy scale, or when affecting an area equivalent to that of a circle 1 inch in diameter on an onion 23 ⁄ 4 inches in diameter, or correspondingly lesser or greater areas on smaller or larger onions.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50950

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PATRICK JONES

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:07-CR-22-2

Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Patrick Jones appeals the sentence imposed following his jury conviction

for possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine within 1,000 feet of a

protected location. He argues that the district court’s drug quantity calculation

was erroneously based on the unreliable trial testimony of Sharon Jones.

In the absence of rebuttal evidence from Jones, the district court correctly

relied on the presentence report in calculating drug quantity. See United States

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 29, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50950

2

v. Gracia, 983 F.2d 625, 630 (5th Cir. 1993). Additionally, Sharon Jones’s

testimony supports the district court’s calculation; her testimony was not

ambiguous regarding the quantity of crack the Joneses sold versus the quantity

they consumed for personal use, it established thatthe Joneses were heavy users

of crack cocaine and used a significant portion of the profits from its sale to

purchase more drugs, and it did not support Jones’s allegation that Sharon

Jones suffered from a mental illness that affected the credibility of her

testimony. The district court’s drug quantity calculation therefore was not error,

plain or otherwise. See United States v. Betancourt, 422 F.3d 240, 246 (5th Cir.

2005).

Jones has moved pro se for “clarification” and appointment of new counsel,

raising ineffective assistance of counsel claims. Ineffective assistance of counsel

claims generally cannot be addressed on direct appeal unless they have been

presented to the district court. Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500, 505

(2003); United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Jones’s

ineffective assistance claims are therefore best addressed on 28 U.S.C. § 2255

review. Insofar as Jones requested the appointment of new appellate counsel,

he did so after counsel had filed a brief; therefore his request is untimely. Cf.

United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND APPOINTMENT OF

NEW COUNSEL DENIED.
#### SCHLESINGER v. BERNSTEIN (13 cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Actions by Leo Schlesinger against Samuel Bernstein, impleaded.

No opinion. Motions granted, with $10 costs. Orders filed.