Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 232 / Friday, December 3, 2010 / Notices 75463 

Title of Collection: Evaluation of the 

Carol M. White Physical Education 

Program. 

OMB Control Number: Pending. 

Agency Form Number(s): N/A. 

Frequency of Responses: Twice. 

Affected Public: Not-for-profit 

institutions; State, Local, or Tribal 

Government, State Educational 

Agencies or Local Educational Agencies. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Responses: 77. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Burden Hours: 154. 

Abstract: To answer the evaluation 

questions put forth by U.S. Department 

of Education regarding program 

implementation, partnerships, data use, 

and student outcomes, American 

Institutes for Research proposes a twophase research design, drawing on 

survey data to be collected from 

administrators at Carol M. White 

Physical Education Program (PEP) 

projects and analyses of extant student 

outcome data pertinent to physical 

activity levels, fitness, and nutrition 

intake. Findings from this study will 

provide feedback to both ED and 

grantees with regard to the performance 

of the PEP, and will inform future 

improvements to the program. 

Requests for copies of the proposed 

information collection request may be 

accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, 

by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending 

Collections’’ link and by clicking on link 

number 4458. When you access the 

information collection, click on 

‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view. 

Written requests for information should 

be addressed to U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., 

LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537. 

Requests may also be electronically 

mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed 

to 202–401–0920. Please specify the 

complete title of the information 

collection and OMB Control Number 

when making your request. 

Individuals who use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Information 

Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877– 

8339. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30393 Filed 12–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

ENVIROMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9234–9] 

Clean Air Act Operating Permit 

Program; Petition To Object to Title V 

Permit for Luke Paper Company, Luke, 

MD 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of final action. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) 

of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA 

Administrator signed an order, dated 

October 18, 2010, partially granting and 

partially denying a petition to object to 

a state operating permit issued by the 

Maryland Department of the 

Environment (MDE) on January 22, 2009 

to Luke Paper Company for its facility 

located in Luke, Maryland. This order 

constitutes final action on the petition 

filed by the Environmental Integrity 

Project, and Environment Maryland, 

dated February 27, 2009, requesting that 

the Administrator object to the issuance 

of the proposed title V permit. 

Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the 

CAA, the petitioner may seek judicial 

review of those portions of the petition 

which EPA denied in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit. Any petition for review shall be 

filed within 60 days of this notice in 

accordance with the requirements of 

section 307 of the CAA. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the final order, the 

petition, and all pertinent information 

relating thereto are on file at the 

following location: Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region III, Air 

Protection Division (APD), 1650 Arch 

St., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

The final order is also available 

electronically at the following Web site: 

http://www.epa.gov/region07/air/title5/

petitiondb/petitiondb.htm. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Talley, Air Protection Division, 

EPA Region III, telephone (215) 814– 

2117, or by e-mail at 

talley.david@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean 

Air Act (CAA) affords EPA a 45-day 

period to review and object to, as 

appropriate, operating permits proposed 

by state permitting authorities. Section 

505(b)(2) of the CAA authorizes any 

person to petition the EPA 

Administrator within 60 days after the 

expiration of this review period to 

object to a state operating permit if EPA 

has not done so. Petitions must be based 

only on objections raised with 

reasonable specificity during the public 

comment period, unless the petitioner 

demonstrates that it was impracticable 

to raise these issues during the comment 

period or that the grounds for objection 

or other issue arose after the comment 

period. 

EPA received a petition from the 

Petitioners, dated February 27, 2009, 

requesting that EPA object to the 

issuance of the proposed title V permit 

for Luke Paper Company because of, (1) 

Inadequate monitoring requirements for 

particulate matter; (2) failure of the 

permit to include a Compliance 

Assurance Monitoring (CAM) plan for 

boiler Nos. 24 and 25; and (3) failure of 

the permit to include emission limits for 

hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) for 

boiler Nos. 24 and 25 as required by 

Section 112(j) of the CAA. The order 

explains the reasons behind EPA’s 

decision to partially grant and partially 

deny the petition for objection. 

Dated: November 19, 2010. 

W.C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30349 Filed 12–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the 

Federal Communications Commission 

for Extension Under Delegated 

Authority, Comments Requested 

November 29, 2010. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. 

Comments are requested concerning: 

(a) Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; and (e) ways to 

further reduce the information 

collection burden for small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 employees 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES