alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
22.1016 Statement of equivalent rates for Federal hires.       (a) 						            The statement required under the clause at 52.222-42, Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires, (see 22.1006(b)) shall set forth those wage rates and fringe benefits that would be paid by the contracting activity to the various classes of service employees expected to be utilized under the contract if 5 U.S.C.5332 (General Schedule-white collar) and/or 5 U.S.C.5341 (Wage Board-blue collar) were applicable.                                          (b) 						            Procedures for computation of these rates are as follows:                                                         (1) 								                Wages paid blue collar employees shall be the basic hourly rate for each class. The rate shall be Wage Board pay schedule step two for nonsupervisory service employees and step three for supervisory service employees.                                                            (2) 								                Wages paid white collar employees shall be an hourly rate for each class. The rate shall be obtained by dividing the general pay schedule step one biweekly rate by 80.                                                            (3) 								                Local civilian personnel offices can assist in determining and providing grade and salary data.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 22.10 - Service Contract Labor Standards
§ 4280.323 Ineligible microloan purposes and uses. Agency loan funds will not be used for the payment of microlender administrative costs or expenses and microlenders may not make microloans under the program for any of the purposes and uses identified as ineligible in paragraphs (a) through (n) of this section. ( a ) Construction costs including property demolition, renovation, elimination of walls, or property additions.
( b ) The financing of timeshares, apartments, duplexes, or other residential housing.
( c ) Assistance that will cause a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest including but not limited to: ( 1 ) Financial assistance to principals, directors, officers, or employees of the microlender, or their close relatives, as defined; or
( 2 ) Financial assistance to any entity which would appear to benefit the microlender or its principals, directors, or employees, or their close relatives, as defined, in any way other than the normal repayment of debt.
( d ) Distribution or payment to a microborrower when such will use any portion of the microloan for other than business purposes.
( e ) Microloans to a charitable institution not gaining sufficient revenue from business sales or services to support the operation and repay the microloan.
( f ) Microloans to a fraternal organization.
( g ) Any microloan to an applicant that has an RMAP-funded microloan application pending with another microlender or that has an RMAP-funded microloan outstanding with another microlender that would cause the applicant to owe a combined amount of more than $50,000 to one or more microlenders under the program.
( h ) Assistance to USDA Rural Development employees, or their close relatives, as defined.
( i ) Microloans for any illegal activity.
( j ) Any project that is in violation of either a Federal, State, or local environmental protection law, regulation, or enforceable land use restriction unless the microloan will result in curing or removing the violation.
( k ) Loans supporting explicitly religious activities, such as worship, religious instruction or proselytization.
( l ) Golf courses, race tracks, or gambling facilities.
( m ) Funding of any political or lobbying activities.
( n ) Lines of credit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      11,508,029
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     125,935,599
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  9,445,358
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      11,978,051
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        13,540,307
<LOANS>                                    136,020,761
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,710,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             179,005,609
<DEPOSITS>                                 149,955,412
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,449,517
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,265,875
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       807,800
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,877,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              19,684,805
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,185,403
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              724,309
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                62,768
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,972,480
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,563,724
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,741,843
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,230,637
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  297,450
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (13,421)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,835,873
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,198,787
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,198,787
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,393,887
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.56
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,400,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   153,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               283,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,422,603
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  157,784
<RECOVERIES>                                   148,009
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,710,278
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,710,278
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



I, Paul E. Martin, the Principal Financial Officer of Enstar Income Program II-2, L.P. (the "Partnership") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

- fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/  Paul E. MartinPaul E. MartinPrincipal Financial OfficerAugust 18, 2004
#### In the Matter of the Liquidation of Manhattan Casualty Company.

— Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers complying with article 11 of the CPLR and, in particular, CPLR 1101 (subd. [e]). Concur—Stevens, J. P., Eager, Steuer, Capozzoli, and Tilzer, JJ.
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 5:94CR5018 LAC

TONY KIMBRO

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on September 19, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR A BOOKER/KIMBROUGH REDUCTION 

Filed by DEFENDANT on 9/18/08 Doc.# 138

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 2nd day of

October, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 5:94-cr-05018-LC Document 143 Filed 10/02/08 Page 1 of 1
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(i), the Attorney General shall, prior to issuing a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a controlled substance in schedule I or II, and prior to issuing a regulation under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2) authorizing the importation of such a substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the bulk manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing. Therefore, in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on July 28, 2010, Fisher Clinical Services, Inc., 7554 Schantz Road, Allentown, Pennsylvania 18106, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule II: Drug
ScheduleNoroxymorphone (9668)
IITapentadol (9780)
II
 The company plans to import the listed substances for analytical research and clinical trials. Any bulk manufacturer who is presently, or is applying to be, registered with DEA to manufacture such basic classes of controlled substances may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration, and may, at the same time, file a written request for a hearing on such application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43, and in such form as prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47. Any such comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than January 3, 2011. This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with, and independent of, the procedures described in 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f). As noted in a previous notice published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745-46), all applicants for registration to import a basic class of any controlled substance in schedule I or II are, and will continue to be, required to demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a); 21 U.S.C. 823(a); and 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) are satisfied. Dated: November 18, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2010-30348 Filed 12-2-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RANDY A. HART,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20cv256-TKW-MJF

MARK INCH, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 4). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, I agree with the magistrate 

judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed pursuant to the “three 

strikes” statute, 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by 

reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(g), all pending 

motions are DENIED as moot, and the Clerk shall close the file.

Case 5:20-cv-00256-TKW-MJF Document 5 Filed 11/02/20 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE and ORDERED this 2nd day of November, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00256-TKW-MJF Document 5 Filed 11/02/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[107th Congress Private Law 3]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl003.107]

Private Law 107-3
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 For the relief of Barbara Makuch. <<NOTE: Oct. 4, 2002 -  [H.R. 486]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT.

    In consideration of the fact that Barbara Makuch--
            (1) served 22 years as a foreign counterintelligence agent 
        and dedicated her life to assist the Federal Bureau of 
        Investigation in its efforts at the height of the Cold War to 
        combat communism, the Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti 
        (KGB), and the Soviet Union,
            (2) was presented the Louis E. Peters Memorial Service 
        Award, the highest civilian award presented by the Federal 
        Bureau of Investigation, for her valorous service, and
            (3) has not received employment assistance or health, social 
        security, or pension benefits, despite assurances that she would 
        receive such benefits upon her retirement,

the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of funds not otherwise 
appropriated, the sum of $1,000,000 to Barbara Makuch of East Amherst, 
New York, in compensation for the lifetime aggregate value of benefits 
earned but not received by Barbara Makuch.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM.

    The sum paid under section 1 shall be in full satisfaction of any 
claims that Barbara Makuch may have against the United States arising 
out of her service for the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY FEES.

    Not more than 10 percent of the sum paid under section 1 shall be 
paid to or received by any agent or attorney for services rendered in 
connection with the recovery of such sum. Any person who violates this 
section shall be fined under title 18, United States Code.
```
§ 4285.69 Evaluation and disposition of applications. ( a ) *Evaluation.* ( 1 ) All proposals received from eligible applicants and postmarked in accordance with deadlines established in the annual program solicitation shall be evaluated by the Assistant Administrator for Cooperative Services through an RDA or its successor agency staff panel. The Assistant Administrator for Cooperative Services will select the evaluation panel from staff determined to be highly qualified in the subject matter areas that were emphasized in the current year's solicitation and from those with no potential conflict of interest with the applicants.
( 2 ) Prior to technical examination, a preliminary review will be made for responsiveness to the program solicitation (e.g., relationship of proposal to research topic(s) listed in solicitation). Proposals that do not fall within the guidelines as stated in the program solicitation will be eliminated from competition and will be returned to the applicant.
( 3 ) Proposals will be ranked based on evaluation criteria established in § 4285.70 of this subpart, and financial support levels will be recommended to the Assistant Administrator for Cooperative Services by the panel within the limitation of the total funding available in the fiscal year. The purpose of these evaluations is to provide information upon which the Assistant Administrator for Cooperative Services may make informed judgments in selecting proposals. Such recommendations are advisory only and are not binding on the awarding official of RDA or its successor agency. To ensure a comprehensive evaluation, all applications should be written with the care and thoroughness accorded papers for publication.
( b ) *Disposition.* ( 1 ) On the basis of the Assistant Administrator for Cooperative Services's evaluation of an application in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the Assistant Administrator for Cooperative Services will either: ( i ) Approve support using currently available funds;
( ii ) Defer support due to lack of funds or need for further evaluation; or
( iii ) Disapprove support for the proposed project in whole or in part.
( 2 ) With respect to any approved project, the Assistant Administrator for Cooperative Services will determine the project period during which the project may be funded.
( 3 ) Any deferral or disapproval of an application will not preclude its reconsideration or reapplication during subsequent fiscal years. However, applicants must reapply if reconsideration is desired.
( 4 ) The Assistant Administrator for Cooperative Services will not make a cooperative agreement funding award, based upon an application covered by this part, unless the application has been properly reviewed in accordance with the provisions of this part and unless said reviewers have made recommendations concerning the scientific merit and relevance to the program of such application.
#### § 372.6 Early planning.

Prospective applicants are encouraged to contact APHIS program officials to determine what types of environmental analyses or documentation, if any, need to be prepared.

[83 FR 24011, May 24, 2018]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
     ECLIPSE  CORPORATION  UNAUDITED  BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE
     RELATED  STATEMENT  OF  INCOME  FOR THE  THREE  MONTHS  THEN  ENDED  AND IS
     QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS .
                                                                               
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         52,942
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  59,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,105,620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,521,437
<PP&E>                                         141,747
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,337,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,264,090
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       37,578
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,196,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,337,575
<SALES>                                        143,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               143,568
<CGS>                                          116,744
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               876
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             23,868
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (160,593)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (160,593)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (160,593)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.1
  KB
    HOME
    COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
    (In Thousands, Except Ratios)
  Years Ended November 30,2008


2007


2006


2005


2004EarningsIncome (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

$
(967,931
)

$
(1,460,770
)

$
571,847


$
1,201,534


$
642,184Add:Interest incurred


156,402



199,550



237,801



164,245



140,602Amortization of premiums and discounts related to debt


2,062



2,478



2,441



1,550



1,617Portion of rent expense considered to be interest


16,503



28,464



27,657



19,294



14,073Amortization of previously capitalized interest


129,901



171,496



143,249



100,971



77,266Distribution of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures, net
    of equity in income (loss)


157,393



171,576



15,164



(2,242
)


(2,302
)Deduct:Interest capitalized


(143,436
)


(186,560
)


(221,074
)


(142,738
)


(121,241
)Income (loss) as adjusted

$
(649,106
)

$
(1,073,766
)

$
777,085


$
1,342,614


$
752,199Fixed chargesInterest incurred

$
156,402


$
199,550


$
237,801


$
164,245


$
140,602Amortization of premiums and discounts related to debt


2,062



2,478



2,441



1,550



1,617Portion of rent expense considered to be interest


16,503



28,464



27,657



19,294



14,073$
174,967


$
230,492


$
267,899


$
185,089


$
156,292Ratio of earnings to fixed charges










2.90



7.25



4.81Coverage deficiency (a)

$
(824,073
)

$
(1,304,258
)

$



$



$
       (a)
    
    Earnings for the year ended November 30, 2008 were
    insufficient to cover fixed charges for the period by
    $824.1 million. Earnings for the year ended
    November 30, 2007 were insufficient to cover fixed charges
    for the period by $1.30 billion.
29.402-4           Taxes—Foreign Contracts in Afghanistan.       (a)                   Use the clause at 52.229-13, Taxes—Foreign Contracts in Afghanistan, in solicitations and contracts with performance in Afghanistan awarded by or on behalf of U.S. Forces, unless the clause at 52.229-14 is used.                                          (b)                   Use the clause at 52.229-14, Taxes—Foreign Contracts in Afghanistan (North Atlantic Treaty Organization Status of Forces Agreement), instead of the clause at 52.229-13, Taxes—Foreign Contracts in Afghanistan, in solicitations and contracts with performance in Afghanistan awarded on behalf of or in support of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which are governed by the NATO Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA).    **Parent topic:** 29.402 Foreign contracts.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 22, 2016

Order 

January 22, 2016

152831(3)

IN RE LISA O. GORCYCA, JUDGE

6th CIRCUIT COURT

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION

____________________________________________/

SC: 152831

JTC Formal Complaint 98

On order of the Court, the request by the Judicial Tenure Commission for the 

appointment of a master is considered, and the Honorable Daniel P. Ryan is hereby 

appointed master to hear Formal Complaint No. 98.