alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. EL10-77-000]
 City of Pella, Iowa
Docket No. EL10-77-000.v.Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.,MidAmerican Energy Company, Inc.
 Take notice that on November 15, 2010, the City of Pella, Iowa (Complainant) filed a motion to add a document as Exhibit P-28 to its July 2, 2010 petition for declaratory order and formal complaint against Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc. and MidAmerican Energy Company, Inc. (Respondents). Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and protests must be served on the Complainants. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the 
                    ( print page 73076)
                    “eFiling” link at 
                    *http://www.ferc.gov.*
                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at 
                    *http://www.ferc.gov,*
                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
                    *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*
                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659. *Comment Date:*
                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on December 15, 2010. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2010-29848 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# 22.403-4           Executive Orders 13658 and 14026.

Executive Order (E.O.) 13658 established minimum *wages* for certain workers at $10.10 per hour. The E.O. 13658 rate has increased each year since 2015, rising to $11.25 on January 1, 2022. As of January 30, 2022, E.O. 13658 is superseded by E.O. 14026 to the extent that it is inconsistent with E.O. 14026; the minimum wage rate for certain workers is increased to $15.00 per hour. The wage rate is subject to annual increases by an amount determined by the Secretary of Labor. See subpart  22.19. The clause at 52.222-55, Minimum *Wages* for Contractor Workers under Executive Order 14026, requires the E.O. 14026 minimum wage rate to be paid if it is higher than other minimum wage rates, such as the subpart  22.4 statutory wage determination amount.

**Parent topic:**22.403 Statutory, Executive Order, and regulatory requirements.
#### §§ 3560.211-3560.249 [Reserved]
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

AUGUSTA SANDINO CHRISTIAN

NAMPHY, DREAM DEFENDERS,

NEW FLORIDA MAJORITY,

ORGANIZE FLORIDA, and

FLORIDA IMMIGRANT

COALITION,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO.: 4:20cv485-MW/MAF

RON DESANTIS, in his official

Capacity as Governor of the State 

of Florida, and LAUREL M. LEE,

in her official capacity as Florida

Secretary of State,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER STRIKING BELATED FILINGS 

On October 8, 2020, this Court heard oral argument on Plaintiffs’ motion for 

preliminary injunction. At the hearing, this Court granted Defendant Lee’s oral 

motion to strike Plaintiffs’ Notice of Supplemental Declaration of Nicholas Ritchey, 

ECF No. 28, as untimely. Because this Court struck Plaintiffs’ belated affidavit, it 

also strikes Defendant Lee’s Notice of Filing Hourly Over Data, ECF No. 29. 

This Court will consider only the parties’ papers and evidence filed by the 

Court’s deadlines set at a telephonic scheduling conference on October 7, 2020. For 

this reason, this Court did not call live witnesses during the preliminary injunction 

Case 4:20-cv-00485-MW-MAF Document 32 Filed 10/08/20 Page 1 of 2
2

hearing, even though Defendant Lee was prepared to produce Ms. Matthews and Mr. 

Maynor upon this Court’s request, ECF No. 20.

SO ORDERED on October 8, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00485-MW-MAF Document 32 Filed 10/08/20 Page 2 of 2
2005-1565.

#### Natl. City Bank v. Wilkins.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-A-1326. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant’s request for oral argument,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the request is granted.
#### Joan Terry et al., Respondents, v Midvale Golf and Country Club et al., Appellants, and Joan Di Giro, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment and order reversed and a new trial granted unless plaintiff Joan Terry shall within 20 days stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $150,000 in which event the judgment is modified, accordingly, and, as modified, is, together with the order, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. Memorandum: In this personal injury action, plaintiffs sued defendants Harley Davidson and Valley Leasing Company for damages on the theories of negligence, breach of warranty and strict products liability. They sued Midvale Golf and Country Club on the theories of negligence and breach of *1050warranty. Although the court’s instructions to the jury were far from perfect, the only serious error preserved for our review by appropriate exception was the court’s refusal to charge that plaintiffs were required to prove Joan Terry’s freedom from contributory negligence before they could recover on the theory of strict products liability (see *Bolin v Triumph Corp.,*58 AD2d 1014, 71 AD2d 429). That claim was predicated on evidence that plaintiff Joan Terry had knowledge (acquired months earlier) that the steering mechanism on the golf carts had a tendency to lock in a turning position, and that with that knowledge she turned her back on defendant Di Giro’s golf cart while proceeding to enter the cart in which she was riding. We doubt that a finding of contributory negligence could be supported on that limited proof, but even if it could, the jury necessarily found Mrs. Terry free of fault when it ruled in her favor against the defendant Midvale Golf and Country Club on the negligence and breach of warranty causes of action asserted against it. We conclude, however, that the verdict for plaintiff Joan Terry is excessive and reverse and order a new trial unless the parties stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $150,000. All concur, except Schnepp and Callahan, JJ., who dissent and vote to affirm. (Appeals from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court—personal injuries.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Witmer, JJ.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academic AchievementAfter School EducationAfter School ProgramsCommunity ProgramsCooperative ProgramsElementary Secondary EducationEnrichment ActivitiesExtended School DayExtracurricular ActivitiesFinancial SupportLearning ActivitiesPartnerships in EducationProgram DescriptionsSupplementary Education

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### § 4287.200 OMB control number.

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the information collection requirements contained in this rule have been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB Control Number 0570-0069 for OMB approval.
98-1464.

#### State v. Kelly.

Medina App. No. 2670-M. On motion for delayed appeal. Motion granted.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.
§ 51.1144 U.S. No. 1 Golden. The requirements for this grade are the same as for U.S. No. 1 except that not more than 30 percent, by count, of the fruit shall have more than one-third of their surface, in the aggregate, affected by discoloration. ( a ) For tolerances see § 51.1151.
( b ) Internal quality: Lots meeting the internal requirements for “U.S. Grade AA Juice (Double A)” or “U.S. Grade A Juice” may be so specified in connection with the grade. (See §§ 51.1176-51.1179.)
#### § 51.2945 Application.

The standards contained in this subpart apply only to walnuts commonly known as English or Persian walnuts (Juglans regia). They do not apply to the walnuts commonly known as black walnuts (Juglans nigra).
[Cite as Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Mariotti, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2019-Ohio-579.] 

 1

CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN BAR ASSOCIATION v. MARIOTTI. 

[Cite as Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Mariotti, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 

2019-Ohio-579.] 

(No. 2018-1579—Submitted February 14, 2019—Decided February 19, 2019.) 

ON PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of a 

motion to reinstate law license by respondent, Mark Mariotti. The request was 

not opposed. 

{¶ 2} Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that the request 

is granted and that respondent, Mark Mariotti, Attorney Registration No. 

0067608, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio, is reinstated to the 

practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that the reinstatement of 

respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against him. 

{¶ 3} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). 

{¶ 4} For earlier case, see Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Mariotti, __ Ohio 

St.3d __, 2018-Ohio-4769, __ N.E.3d __. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY,

and STEWART, JJ., concur. 

________________________
#### § 51.2006 Rancidity.

*Rancidity* means that the kernel is noticeably rancid to the taste. An oily appearance of the flesh does not necessarily indicate a rancid condition.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 3:20cr39/MCR

TIMOTHY ERIK JOHNSON

_____________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of the 

Defendant, TIMOTHY ERIK JOHNSON, to Count Two of the indictment is hereby 

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of October 2020. 

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00039-MCR Document 73 Filed 10/29/20 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KENT E. HOVIND and PAUL

JOHN HANSEN as trustee for

Creation Science Evangelism (CSE),

a non-statutory trust,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5484-TKW-MJF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS

This case is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motions for CM/ECF privileges 

(Docs. 26, 27) and Plaintiffs’ motion for an extension of time (Doc. 25). No response 

is necessary, and upon due consideration of these filings and the case file, it is 

ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs’ motions for CM/ECF privileges are DENIED.

2. Plaintiffs’ motion for extension of time is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs shall 

have until May 21, 2021, to file their objections to the magistrate judge’s 

Report and Recommendation.

Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 28 Filed 05/04/21 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE and ORDERED this 4th day of May, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 28 Filed 05/04/21 Page 2 of 2
25.105           Critical             components and critical items.       (a) The following is a list of articles that have been determined to be a critical component or critical item and their respective preference factor(s).                (1)-(2) [Reserved]                                          (b) The list of articles and preference factors in paragraph (a) of this section will be published in the **Federal Register** for public comment no less frequently than once every 4 years. Unsolicited recommendations for deletions from this list may be submitted at any time and should provide sufficient data and rationale to permit evaluation ( *see*                   1.502).                                          (c)                   For determining reasonableness of cost for                      domestic end products that contain critical components or are critical items (                         *see*                   25.106(c)).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 25.1 - Buy American-Supplies
#### § 51.2719 Unshelled.

*Unshelled* means a peanut kernel with part or all of the hull (shell) attached.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                           QUIPP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                 SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995

Diluted                                                    1997         1996         1995
                                                        ----------   ----------   ----------

<S>                                                     <C>          <C>          <C>
NET INCOME (LOSS)                                       $3,081,304   $2,219,828   $2,096,228
                                                        ==========   ==========   ==========

Weighted average number of common
    shares outstanding during the year                   1,576,556    1,565,765    1,565,765

Add-common equivalent shares (determined using the
    "treasury stock" method) representing shares
    issuable upon exercise of employee stock options        53,657            0            0
                                                        ----------   ----------   ----------

Weighted average number of shares used in calculation
    of net income per share                              1,630,213    1,565,765    1,565,765
                                                        ==========   ==========   ==========

Diluted income per common and common
    equivalent share                                          1.89         1.42         1.34
                                                        ==========   ==========   ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1,000

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                      JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                       2,311
<SECURITIES>                                                 3,379
<RECEIVABLES>                                                9,606
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 3,063
<INVENTORY>                                                    523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            14,075
<PP&E>                                                      15,139
<DEPRECIATION>                                              12,316
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              36,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       12,354
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                       122
<OTHER-SE>                                                  18,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                36,652
<SALES>                                                      8,522
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             8,522
<CGS>                                                        1,990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                1,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            11,040
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              4,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          4,609
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 4,609
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (0.41)



</TABLE>
32.006-5 Reporting.       (a) In accordance with 41 U.S.C.4506(h), the head of an agency, other than the Department of Defense, shall prepare a report for each fiscal year in which a recommendation has been received pursuant to 32.006-4(a). Reports within the Department of Defense shall be prepared in accordance with                       10 U.S.C. 3806(h).                                          (b) In accordance with 41 U.S.C.4506(h) and                       10 U.S.C. 3806(h), each report shall contain-                                                         (1) 								                Each recommendation made by the remedy coordination official;                                                            (2) 								                The actions taken on the recommendation(s), with reasons for such actions; and                                                            (3) 								                An assessment of the effects of each action on the Government.    **Parent topic:** 32.006 Reduction or suspension of contract payments upon finding of fraud.
§ 51.3195 U.S. No. 1. *U.S. No. 1* consists of onions which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Similar varietal characteristics, except color when designated as a specialty or mixed pack;
( 2 ) Mature;
( 3 ) Fairly firm; and,
( 4 ) Fairly well shaped.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Decay;
( 2 ) Wet sunscald;
( 3 ) Doubles; and,
( 4 ) Bottlenecks.
( c ) Free from damage caused by: ( 1 ) Seedstems;
( 2 ) Splits;
( 3 ) Dry sunken areas;
( 4 ) Sunburn;
( 5 ) Sprouting;
( 6 ) Staining;
( 7 ) Dirt or foreign material;
( 8 ) Mechanical;
( 9 ) Tops;
( 10 ) Roots;
( 11 ) Translucent scales;
( 12 ) Watery scales;
( 13 ) Moisture;
( 14 ) Disease;
( 15 ) Insects; and,
( 16 ) Other means.
( d ) For size and tolerances see §§ 51.3198 and 51.3199.
[60 FR 46980, Sept. 8, 1995, as amended at 79 FR 63294, Oct. 23, 2014]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roy Hendrickson, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 7, 1975, convicting him of possession of weapons, etc., as a felony, and of menacing, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. The facts upon which the conviction was based have not been considered. The prosecutor commented, in his summation, "Fortunately the police car came on the scene. No violence took place. No violence [was] involved because the officers saw the movement of the defendant’s hands.” This comment was completely without basis in the record, and might have implied to the jury that the defendant intended to commit crimes with which he was not charged. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, O’Connor and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Order entered November 17, 2022 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01188-CV 

IN RE CRETIC ENERGY SERVICES, LLC; CATAPULT ENERGY 

SERVICES GROUP LLC; NGP CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-05978 

ORDER 

Based on our opinion of this date, we DISMISS relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus. We DENY real parties in interest’s motion for sanctions. 

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN 

 JUSTICE
#### § 3570.75 Grantee contracts.

The requirements of 7 CFR 1942.4, 1942.17(e), 1942.17(l), 1942.118, and 1942.119 will be applicable when agreements between grantees and third parties are involved.
§ 51.2277 U.S. No. 1. “U.S. No. 1” consists of portions of walnut kernels which are well dried, clean, free from shell, foreign material, insect injury, decay, rancidity, and free from damage caused by shriveling, mold, discoloration of the meat or other means. (See § 51.2280.) ( a ) Color shall be specified in connection with this grade in terms of “extra light,” “light,” “light amber,” or “amber” from the USDA Walnut Color Chart or in terms of “red” color. The color classifications in the USDA Walnut Color Chart shall not apply to “red” color. Furthermore, “red” color shall not be mixed with “extra light,” “light,” “light amber,” or “amber” colors. (See §§ 51.2281 and 51.2282.)
( b ) Size shall be specified in connection with this grade in terms of one of the size classifications. (See §§ 51.2284 and 51.2285.)
[23 FR 10354, Dec. 25, 1958. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 82 FR 39656, Aug. 22, 2017]