alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 54.13 Accessibility and refrigeration of products; access to establishments; suitable work environment; and access to records. ( a ) The applicant shall make products easily accessible for examination, with appropriate and adequate illuminating facilities, in order to disclose their class, grade, other quality characteristics, and compliance with official standards or other contractual requirements for which service is being provided. Supervisors of grading and other employees of the Department responsible for maintaining uniformity and accuracy of service shall have access to all parts of establishments covered by approved applications for service under the regulations, for the purpose of examining all products in the establishments that have been or are to be graded or examined for compliance with specifications or which bear any marks of grade or compliance.
( b ) Grading service will be furnished only for meat that an official grader determines is chilled so that grade factors are developed to the extent that a proper grade determination can be made in accordance with the official standards. Meat that is presented in a frozen condition is not eligible for a grade determination. Meat of all eligible species shall be graded only in the establishment where the animal was slaughtered or initially chilled (except for veal and calf carcasses, which will be graded only after the hide is removed and only in the establishment where such removal occurs).
( c ) Applicants are responsible for providing a work environment where official graders are not subjected to physical and/or verbal abuse, or other elements that could have a negative effect on providing an unbiased, third-party evaluation. Applicants shall designate primary company representatives to discuss grade placements and certification determinations with official graders.
( d ) Applicants will make products and related records (approved labeling, technical proposals, quality plans, specifications, end product data schedules, grade volume information, etc.) easily accessible and provide assistance and any equipment necessary to accomplish the requested services. Equipment may include storage lockers/cabinets, branding ink, certified scales, food blenders, processors, grinders, sampling containers, sanitation equipment, thermometers, adequate lighting, weight tags, display monitors, video equipment for monitoring live animal schedules, etc. When offering product for grading or certification, applicants must ensure a minimum of 90 percent acceptable product.
( e ) Applicants will provide a metal cabinet(s) or locker(s) for the secure storage of official meat grading equipment and identification devices for each official meat grader assigned to their establishment. Such cabinet(s) or locker(s) must be capable of being locked with a Government-owned lock and be located in an easily accessible and secure location within the applicant's establishment.
[84 FR 48556, Sept. 16, 2019]
31.100 Scope of subpart.       This subpart describes the applicability of the cost principles and procedures in succeeding subparts of this part to various types of contracts and subcontracts. It also describes the need for advance agreements.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 31.1 - Applicability
§ 4284.962 Transfer of obligations. At the discretion of the Agency and on a case-by-case basis, an obligation of funds established for an Applicant may be transferred to a different (substituted) Applicant provided: ( a ) The substituted Applicant: ( 1 ) Is eligible;
( 2 ) Has a close and genuine relationship with the original Applicant; and
( 3 ) Has the authority to receive the assistance approved for the original Applicant; and
( b ) The project continues to meet all product, purpose, and reserved funds eligibility requirements so that the need, purpose(s), and scope of the project for which the Agency funds will be used remain substantially unchanged.
<page>
                                                            Exhibit 31.1

Certification required by Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Kevin T. Knight, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nordstrom Credit,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: September 9, 2003                   /s/ Kevin T. Knight
      -------------------                 -----------------------------
                                          Kevin T. Knight
                                          President
#### § 51.1173 Very serious damage.

*Very serious damage* means any specific defect described in § 51.1175, Table I; or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which very seriously detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the fruit.
#### § 501.7 Intoxicating beverages and narcotics.

Entering Research Center property or the operating of a motor vehicle thereon, by a person under the influence of intoxicating beverages or narcotic drug, hallucinogen, marijuana, barbiturate, or amphetamine (unless prescribed by a physician) or the consumption of such beverages, or the use of any such drug or substance in or on the Research Center property, is prohibited.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50369

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LOUIS GEORGE BAGLIERE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(94-CR-95(1))

August 19, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JONES and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Louis George Bagliere, Jr. pled guilty to conspiracy to manufacture

methamphetamine, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. At the time of Bagliere’s arrest

the officers seized his vehicle and money and thes e items subsequently were1 United States v. Ursery , 1996 WL 340815 at *16.

2 forfeited to the government. Bagliere appeals, contending that his criminal

convictions and sentence constitute a violation of the double jeopardy clause of the

fifth amendment.

This argument is foreclosed by the very recent de cision in which the

Supreme Court concluded that “ in rem civil fo rfeitures are neither ‘punishment’ nor

criminal for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause.” 1 Accordingly, this

assignment of error is meritless and the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
# 44.403 Contract clause.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.244-6, Subcontracts for *Commercial Products* and *Commercial Services*, in *solicitations* and contracts other than those for *commercial products* or *commercial services*.          

**Parent topic:**Subpart 44.4 - Subcontracts for Commercial Products and Commercial Services
No. 89-6973.

#### Clark *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Secretary

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Crystal Scott, Director, Office of Executive Resources, Room C5508, U.S. Department of Labor, Frances Perkins Building, 200 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20210, telephone: (202) 693-7628.

Signed at Washington, DC, on 24th day of November 2010.

Hilda L. Solis,

Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 2010-30210 Filed 11-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-23-P
116 STAT. 1754 PUBLIC LAW 107–270—OCT. 30, 2002

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4794:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

June 18, considered and passed House.

Oct. 17, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–270

107th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1895 Avenida

Del Oro in Oceanside, California, as the ‘‘Ronald C. Packard Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

1895 Avenida Del Oro in Oceanside, California, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Ronald C. Packard Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ronald

C. Packard Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 30, 2002.

Oct. 30, 2002

[H.R. 4794]
#### § 58.10 Filing of application.

An application for inspection or grading service shall be regarded as filed only when made pursuant to this subpart.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

## Public Announcement; Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (Public Law 94-409) [5 U.S.C. Section 552b]

# Agency Holding Meeting

Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission.

# Time and Date

10 a.m., December 7, 2010.

# Place

 5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.

# Status

Open.

# Matters To Be Considered

The following matters have been placed on the agenda for the open Parole Commission meeting:

1. Approval of Minutes September 9, 2010 Quarterly Business Meeting.

2. Reports from the Chairman, Commissioners and Section Administrators.

3. Revision of Original Jurisdiction Rule and Addition of a Rule on Tie Votes.

# Agency Contact

Patricia W. Moore, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5933.

Dated: November 29, 2010.

Rockne J. Chickinell

General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-30346 Filed 12-3-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
EXHIBIT 31.1                         CERTIFICATION

I, Robert L. Saxe, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of Research Frontiers Incorporated ("RFI" or the "Registrant")
certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of RFI;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's  internal
control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's  most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's  auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant's  board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's  ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 28, 2004               /s/ Robert L. Saxe
                                      Robert L. Saxe, Chairman and
                                      Chief Executive Officer
#### § 51.2546 Size.

Nuts may be considered as meeting a size designation specified in Table IV or a range in number of nuts per ounce, provided, the weight of 10 percent, by count, of the largest nuts in a sample does not exceed 1.50 times the weight of 10 percent, by count, of the smallest and the average number of nuts per ounce is not more than one-half nut above or below the extremes of the range specified.

Table IV—Nut Size

| Size designations | Average number of nuts per ounce1 |
| --- | --- |
| Colossal | Less than 18. |
| Extra Large | 18 to 20. |
| Large | 21 to 25. |
| Medium | 26 to 30. |
| Small | More than 30. |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 Before Roasting. | |

[[68 FR 50684](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/68-FR-50684), Aug. 22, 2003]
9.104-2 Special standards.       (a)                    						            When it is necessary for a particular acquisition or class of acquisitions, the contracting officer shall develop, with the assistance of appropriate specialists, special standards of responsibility. Special standards may be particularly desirable when experience has demonstrated that unusual expertise or specialized facilities are needed for adequate contract performance. The special standards shall be set forth in the solicitation (and so identified) and shall apply to all offerors.                                          (b)                    						            Contracting officers shall award contracts for subsistence only to those prospective contractors that meet the general standards in 9.104-1 and are approved in accordance with agency sanitation standards and procedures.    **Parent topic:** 9.104 Standards.
Exhibit 31(b)(1)

NEWSTAR FINANCIAL, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John K. Bray,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of NewStar Financial, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 7, 2008



/s/ John K. BrayJohn K. BrayChief Financial Officer
PURPOSE AND GOALS OF 

DISCUSSION SESSIONS 
GOALS

Identify and understand the criteria that alternatives (chemical and/or no chemical) 

will need to satisfy to be an effective replacement.

Understand lessons learned from previous work that can be used to inform future 

substitutions.

Identify a list of measures, for example, for worker protection, other than chemical 

substitution, that could be used to reduce exposure to TCE in the given applications.
GOALS

Provide a summary of the conclusions reached during each of the two discussion 

sessions that will identify:

 Key common elements that can help to transition to safer alternatives or implement exposure reduction 

measures

 Specific chemicals or formulations that have been shown to be effective replacements for TCE in some 

applications.

 Specific applications for which there are no known, viable alternatives to TCE as well as identify other 

methods to reduce risks in these applications. 

Make the knowledge and experience that will be shared today and tomorrow

available to others using TCE who are looking for risk reduction opportunities. 
DEVELOPING CRITERIA

Systems Approach

 Identify the industrial process

 Performance

 Chemistry

 Productivity, throughput

 Health and Environmental

 Cost

 Why the chemical

 Why not the chemical

 User
QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER IN THE CASE STUDIES

Where was TCE used and why?

What was the impetus for seeking an alternative for TCE?

What considerations were taken into account to identify potential alternatives?

How was the list of potential alternatives narrowed down?

How were alternatives evaluated for efficacy?

How were environmental/health considerations taken into account in identifying 

alternatives?

How was a final alternative selected for use?

What lessons were learned in reducing exposure to TCE that could help inform future 

decision making?
POTENTIAL OUTCOMES: 

AEROSOLS AND COLD CLEANING

List of criteria that potential alternatives will need to satisfy if they are to be used as 

replacements for TCE. 

What key lessons were learned in transitioning from TCE to an alternative that could 

help inform future substitutions? 

Are there generalizations that can be made so that future substitutions are easier to 

conduct? 

Are there any characteristics, or combinations of characteristics that resulted in no 

viable alternatives to TCE? 

List of measures other than chemical substitution that can be used to reduce exposure 

to TCE. 
POTENTIAL OUTCOMES: VAPOR DEGREASING

List of criteria that potential alternatives will need to satisfy if they are to be used as 

replacements for TCE. 

What key lessons were learned in transitioning from TCE to an alternative that could 

help inform future substitutions? 

Are there generalizations that can be made so that future substitutions are easier to 

conduct? 

Are there any characteristics, or combinations of characteristics that resulted in no 

viable alternatives to TCE? 

List measures other than chemical substitution that can be used to reduce exposure to 

TCE as a vapor degreaser.