alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BRANDON RAY SMILEY BERRY,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5637/MCR/EMT

ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on October 

19, 2020 (ECF No. 6). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections were filed. On de novo 

review, the Court has determined that the chief magistrate judge’s findings and 

recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. Therefore, 

the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) 

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court.

Case 3:20-cv-05637-MCR-EMT Document 7 Filed 11/19/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cv5637/MCR/EMT

3. The clerk is directed to close this file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of November, 2020.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05637-MCR-EMT Document 7 Filed 11/19/20 Page 2 of 2
98-547.

#### State ex rel. McVay v. Indus. Comm.

In Mandamus. On request for oral argument. Request denied.
§ 51.1176 U.S. Grade AA Juice (Double A). Any lot of oranges, the juice content of which meets the following requirements, may be designated “U.S. Grade AA Juice (Double A)”: ( a ) Each lot of fruit shall contain an average of not less than 5 gallons (18.9 liters) of juice per standard packed box of 13 ⁄ 5 bushels.
( b ) The average juice content for any lot of fruit shall have not less than 10 percent total soluble solids, and not less than one-half of 1 percent anhydrous citric acid, or more than the permissible maximum acid specified in Table II of § 51.1178.
Amended Schedule to Forms of Indemnification Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Amended Schedule to the Forms of 
 Indemnification Agreement 
 Sunoco, Inc. has entered into Indemnification Agreements with the directors, executive officers, trustees, fiduciaries, employees or agents named below: 
  

					
	 Employee
	  	 Date of Agreement
	  	
			
	 Michael J. Colavita
	  	September 2, 2004	  	
	 John F. Carroll
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Terence P. Delaney
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Lynn L. Elsenhans
	  	August 8, 2008	  	
	 Bruce G. Fischer
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Peter J. Gvazdauskas
	  	February 4, 2009	  	
	 Michael J. Hennigan
	  	February 2, 2006	  	
	 Vincent J. Kelley
	  	February 2, 2006	  	
	 Joseph P. Krott
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Michael S. Kuritzkes
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Michael J. McGoldrick
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Ann C. Mulé
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Marie A. Natoli
	  	March 3, 2006	  	
	 Robert W. Owens
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Bruce D. Rubin
	  	October 15, 2008	  	
	 Michael J. Thomson
	  	May 30, 2008	  	
	 Dennis Zeleny
	  	January 20, 2009	  	
			
	  
	  		  	
			
	 Robert M. Aiken, Jr.*
	  	February 1, 1996	  	
	 Robert H. Campbell*
	  	February 1, 1996	  	
	 Michael H. R. Dingus*
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 John G. Drosdick*
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Jack L. Foltz*
	  	February 1, 1996	  	
	 David E. Knoll*
	  	February 1, 1996	  	
	 Deborah M. Fretz*
	  	September 6, 2001	  	
	 Thomas W. Hofmann*
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Joel H. Maness*
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Paul A. Mulholland*
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Rolf D. Naku*
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Alan J. Rothman*
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Malcolm I. Ruddock, Jr.*
	  	February 1, 1996	  	
	 David C. Shanks*
	  	February 17, 1997	  	
	 Sheldon L. Thompson*
	  	February 1, 1996	  	
	 Ross S. Tippin, Jr.*
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Charles K. Valutas*
	  	March 4, 2004	  	

  

	*	In a different position or no longer with the Company. 









					
	 Director
	  	 Date of Agreement
	  	 
			
	 Robert J. Darnall
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Gary W. Edwards
	  	May 1, 2008	  	
	 Ursula O. Fairbairn
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Thomas P. Gerrity
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Rosemarie B. Greco
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 John P. Jones, III
	  	September 8, 2006	  	
	 James G. Kaiser
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 R. Anderson Pew
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 G. Jackson Ratcliffe
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 John W. Rowe
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 John K. Wulff
	  	March 8, 2004	  	
			
	  
	  		  	
			
	 Raymond E. Cartledge**
	  	September 6, 2001	  	
	 Robert E. Cawthorn**
	  	February 1, 1996	  	
	 John G. Drosdick**
	  	March 4, 2004	  	
	 Mary J. Evans**
	  	September 6, 2001	  	
	 Robert D. Kennedy**
	  	September 6, 2001	  	
	 Richard H. Lenny**
	  	February 8, 2002	  	
	 Norman S. Matthews **
	  	September 6, 2001	  	
	 William B. Pounds**
	  	February 1, 1996	  	

  

	**	No longer serving on the Board. 

  

 2
#### Anna Noren, Appellant, v. Irving A. Topilow, Respondent.

Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 1, 1966, dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements, unless within 30 days after entry of the order hereon appellant submits a further appendix, including therein all papers upon which the general preference was originally granted *(E. P. Reynolds, Inc.*v. *Nager Elec. Co.,*17 N Y 2d 51). Appeal, insofar as it relates to the court’s “order” (actually a decision during trial) granting defendant’s oral motion for a mistrial, dismissed,, without costs. No appeal lies from a decision or ruling at trial and in any event, as indicated, no order was made. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
16.206-3 Limitations.

This contract type shall not be used unless-

(a) The contract is for research and development and the estimated cost is the simplified acquisition

threshold or less;

(b) The contractor’s accounting system is adequate for price redetermination;

(c) There is reasonable assurance that the price redetermination will take place promptly at the

specified time; and

(d) The head of the contracting activity (or a higher-level official, if required by agency procedures)

approves its use in writing.

Parent topic: 16.206 Fixed-ceiling-price contracts with retroactive price redetermination.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 

Vol. 75, No. 219, Monday, November 15, 2010, page 69640.

# Announced Time and Date of Meeting:

 9 a.m.-12 Noon, Wednesday November 17, 2010.

# Changes to Meeting:

 Meeting Rescheduled to 9 a.m.-12 Noon, Wednesday November 24, 2010.

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# Contact Person for Additional Information:

 Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

Dated: November 17, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-29597 Filed 11-19-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
§ 319.37-3 General restrictions on the importation of plants for planting. ( a ) The importation of certain taxa of plants for planting is not authorized pending pest risk analysis in accordance with § 319.37-4.
( b ) General restrictions that apply to the importation of all plants for planting other than those whose importation is not authorized pending pest risk analysis are found in §§ 319.37-5 through 319.37-11.
( c ) In accordance with § 319.37-20, the Administrator may impose restrictions on the importation of specific types of plants for planting. These restrictions are listed in the Plants for Planting Manual. Additional information on restrictions applicable to the importation of specific types of plants for planting can be found in §§ 319.37-20 through 319.37-23.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Adult EducationAdult StudentsClass ActivitiesClassroom TechniquesEnglish (Second Language)Lesson PlansLiteracy EducationSecond Language InstructionSkill DevelopmentWorld Wide Web

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:00-CR-21-SPM

VINCENT SMITH,

Defendant.

__________________________/

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR A NEW TRIAL

THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon Defendant’s Motion For A New Trial (doc.

251) filed on June 28, 2007. Defendant files his motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal

Procedure 33, under which a district court may grant a new trial “if the interest of justice so

requires”. For the reasons set forth below, this Court denies the Defendant’s Motion.

In a motion for a new trial the court must consider the credibility of the witnesses and

the weight of the evidence presented at trial. United States v. Martinez, 763 F.2d 1297,

1313 (11th Cir. 1985). “The decision on whether to grant or deny a new trial motion is in the

sole discretion of the trial court.” Id at 1312. Motions for new trials, however, are not favored

and are granted only in exceptional circumstances. Id. 

However, in this case, Defendant’s motion is barred by the language of the rule

governing the motion and the Court lacks jurisdiction to examine the merits of the claim. 

Case 5:00-cr-00021-MW-GRJ Document 252 Filed 07/03/07 Page 1 of 2
2

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 33(b)(1) states “Any motion for a new trial grounded

on newly discovered evidence must be filed within 3 years after the verdict or finding of guilty.” 

 When an appeal is taken in a criminal case, the three-year time period for filing a motion for

new trial runs from the date of the appellate court's mandate. See United States v. Dayton,

981 F.2d 1200, 1202 (11th Cir. 1993).

In this case, on October 26, 2001 a jury found the Defendant guilty of 1) conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine; 2) concealing proceeds of specified unlawful

activity; and 3) possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. This verdict was reviewed and

then affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on February 3,

2003. Therefore, the Defendant’s June 28, 2007 Motion for a New Trial is untimely. 

Additionally, Defendant submitted an identical motion on November 2, 2001 (doc. 169). 

This Court denied that motion on November 8, 2001 (doc. 170). The Court’s position has not

changed. Identical motion notwithstanding, because this motion is untimely, the Court has no

jurisdiction to act on the underlying substantive motion.

 Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s Motion for New Trial (doc. 251) is

hereby denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this third day of July, 2007.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 5:00-cr-00021-MW-GRJ Document 252 Filed 07/03/07 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 99.1


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


Contact:  Richard E. Gathright - President and Chief Operating Officer
          or Harold R. Logan, Jr. - Executive Vice President/Finance
          303-626-8200


Monday, 14 September 1998                      RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EASTERN TIME
-------------------------                      ---------------------------------

NEW YORK - Denver-based TransMontaigne Inc. ("TransMontaigne") (ASE:TMG) and
Louis Dreyfus Corporation ("Louis Dreyfus"), Wilton, Connecticut, today
announced the signing of a definitive agreement whereby TransMontaigne will
acquire Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp. ("LDEC") for approximately $161 million plus
working capital.  The consideration will consist of cash and 4.5 million shares
of TransMontaigne common stock.  LDEC is a privately-held, Atlanta-based
downstream petroleum products logistical services subsidiary of Louis Dreyfus.
The transaction is expected to close during the last quarter of 1998, subject to
the completion of due diligence by TransMontaigne and the receipt of regulatory
approvals.

Louis Dreyfus will retain certain unrelated Wilton-based businesses of LDEC,
including its proprietary energy trading unit and Louis Dreyfus Plastics Corp.,
its wholly-owned plastics merchandising subsidiary.

LDEC operates 24 refined petroleum products terminals and storage facilities, 7
of which are wholly-owned and 17 of which are owned jointly with BP Oil Company.
Located in Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina,
North Carolina, Virginia and Pennsylvania, these facilities are primarily
supplied by the Colonial and/or Plantation pipeline systems. The LDEC operations
employ 170 personnel, include over 350 service supply/exchange points nation-
wide and annually handle in excess of 85 million barrels of refined petroleum
products.

TransMontaigne, operating through wholly-owned subsidiaries, provides a broad
range of seamless mid/downstream integrated logistical services to the petroleum
and chemical industry from locations of production and manufacture to
utilization.  With the addition of LDEC, TransMontaigne will strategically
expand the operations and services it provides in the mid-continent region to
the eastern portion of the United States.


                                    - END -
# L_2013309EN.01001301.xml

| 19.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 309/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 309/13

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1163/2013

of 7 November 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Mohant (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovenia’s application to register the name ‘Mohant’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovenia’s application to register the name ‘Mohant’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 November 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 160, 6.6.2013, p. 7.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

SLOVENIA

Mohant (PDO)

---
# L_2013250EN.01002601.xml

| 20.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 250/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 250/26

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 898/2013

of 9 September 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Aceite de Navarra (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Aceite de Navarra’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Aceite de Navarra’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Aceite de Navarra’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Aceite de Navarra’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 September 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 322, 24.10.2012, p. 9.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.5.   Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oils, etc.)

SPAIN

Aceite de Navarra (PDO)

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Case No. 3:20cr56-TKW

DONOVAN ELLIS

/

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the Chief United States 

Magistrate Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty 

of the Defendant, DONOVAN ELLIS, to Counts Three, Five, and Six of the 

indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for 

sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of December 2020. 

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00056-TKW Document 94 Filed 12/11/20 Page 1 of 1
Amendment No. 1 dated February 13, 2009 to the Stock Purchase Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 February 13, 2009 
 Bill Futterer 
 Managing Member 
 Gulf Coast Entertainment, LLC 
 c/o Futterer Partners LLC/PSE-3 
 4030 Wake Forest Road 
 Suite 300 
 Raleigh, NC 27609 
  

	 	RE:	Stock Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) dated the 28th day of January, 2009 between Midwest Racing, Inc., Dover Motorsports, Inc., Gulf Coast Entertainment,
L.L.C. 

 Dear Bill: 
 As
promised (and in less than a page). 
 Please have this letter countersigned below to reflect our agreement to amend Section 3.4 to the
Agreement as follows: 
 In the last sentence, strike the words “and for the racetrack facility to be owned or operated by Buyer at the
Alabama Motorsports Park, a Dale Earnhardt, Jr. Speedway.” Then add a sentence which reads: “Dover shall have first negotiating rights relative to a management agreement for the racetrack facility to be owned or operated by Buyer at the
Alabama Motorsports Park, a Dale Earnhardt, Jr. Speedway.” 
 Thank you. 
 Sincerely, 
  

					
	Dover Motorsports, Inc.	 		 	Midwest Racing, Inc.
		 		 	
	 /s/ Klaus M. Belohoubek
	 		 	 /s/ Klaus M. Belohoubek

	Klaus M. Belohoubek	 		 	Klaus M. Belohoubek
	Senior Vice President – General Counsel	 		 	Senior Vice President – General Counsel

  

			
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED
	
	Gulf Coast Entertainment, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael C. Dow

		
	Date:	 	 2-13-09
Exhibit 12.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mindray Medical International Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   /s/ Li Xiting
EVEREST HICKORY GLEN, LP, as Mortgagor 

(Borrower)

 

LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, FSB, as Mortgagee 

(Lender)

 

**MORTGAGE AND**

**SECURITY AGREEMENT**

 

 

| Dated:    | December __, 2006                                           |
|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|      |                                                        |
| Location: | 1700-1750 West Washington StreetSpringfield, Illinois 62702 |
|      |                                                        |
| County:   | Sangamon                                                    |

 

 

PREPARED BY AND UPON

RECORDING RETURN TO:

 

Best & Flanagan LLP

225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-4690

Attention: Daniel R. Tyson

Telephone: (612) 339-7121

 

 

----