alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 5001.302 Preliminary eligibility review. ( a ) *Contents.* Except as otherwise indicated, each request for a preliminary eligibility review must contain the material identified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section. This information may be submitted in a narrative format or utilizing the lender's preliminary lender's analysis or preliminary credit memo. ( 1 ) Regardless of format, the lenders must provide the following information: ( i ) Name of the proposed borrower and co-borrower(s) as applicable, organization type, address, contact person, email address, and telephone number;
( ii ) Name of the proposed lender, address, telephone number, contact person, email address;
( iii ) Amount of the guaranteed loan request; and if known, the percentage of guarantee requested; the proposed rates and terms of the guaranteed loan; and the source(s) of other funding;
( iv ) If known, a description of collateral to be offered with estimated value(s), identity of guarantors, and the amount and source of equity, other capital, and matching funds to be contributed to the project; and
( v ) A brief description of the project, its location, products or services provided, service area, and, as applicable, availability of raw materials and supplies.
( 2 ) Sufficient information and documentation to enable the Agency to assess borrower, lender, and project eligibility, including summaries or spreadsheets of financial statements or audits, relationships and identity of any affiliates; and copies of organizational documents, organizational charts, and existing debt instruments.
( 3 ) For REAP projects: ( i ) Borrower information as outlined in § 5001.307(a) and (b), and project information as outlined in § 5001.307(c).
( ii ) For REAP RES projects where a residence is located at or is closely associated with and shares an energy metering devise with a rural small business or agricultural operation, demonstration that 50 percent or greater of the energy to be generated by the RES will benefit the rural small business or agricultural operation.
( b ) *Assessment.* Based on the information submitted for the preliminary eligibility review, the Agency will make an informal assessment of the types of guarantee funding applicable to the request, and the eligibility of the borrower, project, and lender. The Agency will provide written informal comments. The assessment may change based on subsequently submitted information, is solely advisory in nature, does not obligate the Agency to approve a guarantee request, and is not considered a favorable or adverse decision by the Agency.
46.311 Higher-level contract quality

requirement.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.246-11, Higher-Level Contract Quality

Requirement, in solicitations and contracts when the inclusion of a higher-level contract quality

requirement is necessary (see 46.202-4).

(b) For each higher-level quality standard, the contracting officer shall fill in the title, number, date,

and tailoring (if any).

Parent topic: Subpart 46.3 - Contract Clauses
160 So.2d 228

#### STATE of Louisiana, through and for the Use and Benefit of Rayford L. WELLS v. Thomas B. CONNER and Edna Ficklin Causey.

No. 47064.

Feb. 14, 1964.

In re: Edna Fickiin Causey applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge 158 So.2d 321.

The application is denied. According to the facts of this case as found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND UNASSIGNED
DEFICIT  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     1,276,607,351
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                 118,656,515
<MORTGAGE>                                 428,951,789
<REAL-ESTATE>                               24,821,247
<TOTAL-INVEST>                           1,849,036,902
<CASH>                                     306,144,739
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             982,903
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          11,045,732,207
<POLICY-LOSSES>                          1,961,265,825
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                       28,782,820
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,500,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 407,917,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            11,045,732,207
<PREMIUMS>                                 231,342,355
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         39,627,811
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             355,699
<OTHER-INCOME>                             132,323,921
<BENEFITS>                                 305,443,870
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,738,198
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,679,698
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,414,199
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0



</TABLE>
#### § 503.1 General.

The rules and regulations in this part cover the buildings, grounds, and vessels of the Plum Island Animal Disease Center (PIADC), United States Department of Agriculture, Orient Point, New York, and apply to all persons entering in or on such properties both on the mainland, Orient Point, New York, and on Plum Island. The Administrator, General Services Administration, has delegated to the Secretary of Agriculture authority to make all needful rules and regulations, and to annex to such rules and regulations such reasonable penalties (not to exceed those prescribed in 40 U.S.C. 318c) as will ensure their enforcement for the protection of persons and property at Plum Island, New York. The Secretary of Agriculture has redelegated this authority to the Assistant Secretary for Conservation, Research, and Education, who in turn has delegated it to the Administrator, Agricultural Research Service (38 FR 31166).
Case 4:20-cr-00045-AW-MAF   Document 21   Filed 11/23/20   Page 1 of 7

Case 4:20-cr-00045-AW-MAF   Document 21   Filed 11/23/20   Page 2 of 7

Case 4:20-cr-00045-AW-MAF   Document 21   Filed 11/23/20   Page 3 of 7

Case 4:20-cr-00045-AW-MAF   Document 21   Filed 11/23/20   Page 4 of 7

Case 4:20-cr-00045-AW-MAF   Document 21   Filed 11/23/20   Page 5 of 7

Case 4:20-cr-00045-AW-MAF   Document 21   Filed 11/23/20   Page 6 of 7

Case 4:20-cr-00045-AW-MAF   Document 21   Filed 11/23/20   Page 7 of 7
#### § 501.14 Non-Federal law enforcement.

Research Center special policemen may be deputized by State or local law enforcement agencies to exercise police power on property outside the Research Center. With the consent of any State or local law enforcement agency, the facilities or services of such State or local law enforcement agency may be utilized by the Research Center.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72841-72842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29746]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Veterans' Employment and Training Service


The Advisory Committee on Veterans' Employment, Training and 
Employer Outreach (ACVETEO); Notice of Cancellation of Open Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The business meeting of the Advisory Committee on Veterans' 
Employment, Training and Employer Outreach (ACVETEO) scheduled for 
teleconference on Friday, December 3, 2010 from 2 to 3:30 p.m., has 
been cancelled. This meeting was announced

[[Page 72842]]

in the Federal Register of November 4, 2010 at 75 FR 68007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Green (202) 693-4734

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of November 2010.
John M. McWilliam,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Veterans' Employment and Training Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-29746 Filed 11-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-79-P
# L_2016330EN.01000501.xml

| 3.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 330/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 330/5

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 1302/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC) as regards the clarification, simplification and improvement of the establishment and functioning of such groupings

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 347 of 20 December 2013
  )

| (1) | On page 308, Article 1, point (3) amending Article 3, first subparagraph of paragraph 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006: |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On page 308, Article 1, point (3) amending Article 3, first subparagraph of paragraph 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006:

for:

| ‘(f) | national, regional or local authorities, or bodies or public undertakings, equivalent to those referred to under point (d), from third countries, subject to the conditions laid down in Article 3a.’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(f)

read:

| ‘(f) | national, regional or local authorities, or bodies or undertakings, equivalent to those referred to under points (d) and (e), from third countries, subject to the conditions laid down in Article 3a.’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(f)

| (2) | On page 313, Article 1, the following point is added: |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On page 313, Article 1, the following point is added:

| ‘(18) | The text set out in the Annex to this Regulation is added as an annex.’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(18)

---
38.201 Coordination requirements.       (a) 						            Subject to interagency agreements, contracting officers having responsibility for awarding Federal Supply Schedule contracts shall coordinate and obtain approval of the General Services Administration’s Federal Supply Service (FSS) before-                                                         (1) 								                Establishing new schedules;                                                            (2) 								                Discontinuing existing schedules;                                                            (3) 								                Changing the scope of agency or geographical coverage of existing schedules; or                                                            (4) 								                Adding or deleting special item numbers, national stock numbers, or revising their description.                                                                             (b) 						            Requests should be forwarded to the:                General Services Administration Federal Supply Service Office of Acquisition (FC) Washington,DC 20406.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 38.2 - Establishing and Administering Federal Supply Schedules
52.211-4 Availability for Examination of

Specifications Not Listed in the GSA Index of

Federal Specifications, Standards and

Commercial Item Descriptions.

As prescribed in 11.204(d), insert a provision substantially the same as the following:

Availability for Examination of Specifications Not Listed in the GSA Index of Federal Specifications,

Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions (June 1988)

(Activity) _________________________________________

(Complete Address) ____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

(Telephone number) _________________________________

(Person to be contacted) ______________________________

(Time(s) for viewing) ________________________________

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.211 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Eric R. (Anonymous), a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Leroy Ploskitt, Respondent.

Second Department,

June 29, 1970.

*Charles Schinitsky, Law Guardian (Rena K. Uviller*of counsel), for appellant.

*J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel (Jesse J. Fine*and *Stanley Buchsbaum*of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

This appeal is from an order of the Family Court which adjudg’ed the appellant a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for two years. The appellant was charged with committing an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of rape in the first degree in violation of section 130.35 of the Penal Law. He was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent on the uncorroborated testimony of the adult complainant. On this appeal it is argued that the refusal to extend the requirement of corroboration to juvenile proceedings deprived the appellant of both due process and the equal protection of the law *(Matter of Gault,*387 U. S. 1).

No person may be convicted of rape in the first degree solely upon the uncorroborated testimony of the complainant (Penal Law, § 130.15). The requirement has its origin in the fact that *“*crimes of this nature are easily charged and very difficult to disprove, in view of the instinctive horror with which mankind regards them” *(People*v. *Friedman,*139 App. Div. 795, 796). Although an adjudication of juvenile delinquency is not a conviction, “ the proceedings * * * ‘ resulting as they do in a loss of personal freedom, are at the very least quasi-criminal *403in nature.’ *(Matter of Gregory W.,*19 N Y 2d 55, 62. See, also, *Matter of*Gault, 387 U. S. 1; *Matter of*Whittington, 391 U. S. 341.) Consequently * * * there must be full compliance with due process requirements ” *(Matter of Aaron D.,*30 A D 2d 183, 184).

The appellant does not argue here that the requirement of corroboration is necessarily mandated by the due process clause or that the Legislature could not, if it so chose, abolish the requirement altogether. However, the policy embodied in section 130.15 of the Penal Law is not a mere rule of evidence, but a settled legislative declaration that such uncorroborated testimony is inherently untrustworthy and that, without more, the punitive power of the State should not be employed to deprive a citizen of his life, his liberty or his property. Certainly the reliability of the complainant’s testimony is not enhanced solely because the subject of the accusation is an infant.

Accordingly, the appellant should have had the benefit of section 130.15 of the Penal Law (cf. *Matter of Steven B.,*30 A D 2d 442). There is no basis for declining to extend that policy to infants only because they are infants. *Matter of Gault (supra)*and its progeny indicate that such a distinction based solely upon age, without other justification, denies both due process and the equal protection of the law. It follows that the order should be reversed, on the law and the facts, and the petition dismissed.

Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and petition dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2447 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2nd Session
                                S. 2447

To redesignate the White Rocks National Recreation Area in the State of 
  Vermont as the ``Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation 
                                Area''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 16 (legislative day, March 15), 2006

Mr. Leahy (for himself and Mr. Jeffords) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the White Rocks National Recreation Area in the State of 
  Vermont as the ``Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation 
                                Area''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT T. STAFFORD WHITE ROCKS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA .

    (a) Redesignation.--The White Rocks National Recreation Area in the 
State of Vermont, as established by section 202 of the Vermont 
Wilderness Act of 1984 (16 U.S.C. 460nn-1), is redesignated as the 
``Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the recreation area 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 51.2717 Broken.

*Broken* means that more than one-fourth of the peanut kernel is broken off.
#### § 550.121 Advertising.

The Cooperator will not refer in any manner to the USDA or any REE Agency in connection with the use of the results of the award, without prior specific written authorization by the REE Agency. Information obtained as a result of the award will be made available to the public in printed or other forms by the REE Agency at its discretion. The Cooperator will be given due credit for its cooperation in the project. Prior approval is required.
Second Amendment to the Agreement



 Exhibit 10.63 
 SCS CONTRACT NO. SCS-28699 
 Amendment Two (2) to the 
 GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT 
 FOR THE PURCHASE OF CHEMICAL AND/OR GAS
PRODUCTS 
 OF THE 
 MASTER AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF CARBON 
 BETWEEN 
 RED RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCTS, LLC 
 SELLER 
 AND 
 SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, INC.

 BUYER 
 RECITALS

 WHEREAS, effective June 5, 2008 the parties entered into a contract for the purchase and sale of activated carbon
(hereinafter “Contract”), and 
 WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend such contract: 
 NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual agreements, promises and covenants herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: 

Change the wording in Section 34.8 to read as follows: 
 34.8 Conditions to Close 
 This contract is contingent upon the Financial Close of the debt financing for Red River
Environmental Products, LLC’s first production line prior to March 27, 2009, and Supplier shall so advise Purchaser when such financing closes, identifying the lead bank. In the event that Supplier fails to close the Financing then
this Contract shall terminate and the Parties shall have no further obligation whatsoever to each other. 
 Except as amended by this
Amendment Number One (2), all provisions and terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Parties have duly executed this Agreement in their respective corporate names as of the 25th day of February, 2008.  
  

									
	Red River Environmental Products LLC,	 		 	Southern Company Services, Inc.,
			
	(“Supplier”)	 		 	(“Purchaser”)
					
	By:	 	/s/ C. Jean Bustard	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Robert C. Self
	Name:	 	C. Jean Bustard	 		 	Name:	 	Robert C. Self
	Title:	 	Manager	 		 	Title:	 	Sourcing Manager
	Date:	 	Manager 2/25/09	 		 	Date:	 	02/26/2009

  

 Page l of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

 

KELVIN BOWMAN, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:03cv177-RS/WCS 

LIEUTENANT TIMOTHY COPELAND, 

et al, 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/ 

 

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Motion for this Court to Order Lisa G. Jones, 

Official Court Reporter, to Furnish Him with a Free Copy of his Trial Transcript 

(Doc. 254). 

Fees for transcripts furnished to persons permitted to appeal in forma 

pauperis shall be paid by the United States if the trial judge or a circuit judge 

certifies that the appeal is not frivolous (but presents a substantial question). See 28 

U.S.C. § 753(f). Plaintiff has failed to state any reason a transcript is needed to 

decide a substantive issue. United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 325-326, 96 

S. Ct. 2086, 2091, 48 L. Ed. 2d 666 (1976). I find no reason to certify that 

Plaintiff’s appeal is not frivolous. Plaintiff’s Motion for this Court to Order Lisa 

Case 5:03-cv-00177-RS-WCS Document 256 Filed 05/21/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 5:03cv177 

G. Jones, Official Court Reporter, to Furnish Him with a Free Copy of his Trial 

Transcript (Doc. 254) is DENIED. 

ORDERED on May 21, 2008. 

/S/ Richard Smoak__________ 

RICHARD SMOAK 

United States District Judge

Case 5:03-cv-00177-RS-WCS Document 256 Filed 05/21/08 Page 2 of 2
[Cite as Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Mariotti , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2019-Ohio-579.]



### 1 C LEVELAND M ETROPOLITAN B AR A SSOCIATION v . M ARIOTTI . [Cite as Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Mariotti , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2019-Ohio-579.] (No. 2018-1579

— Submitted February 14, 2019

— Decided February 19, 2019.)
O N P ETITION FOR R EINSTATEMENT

.

____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of a motion to reinstate law license by res pondent, Mark Mariotti. The request was not opposed. {¶ 2} Upon consideration thereof, it is orde red by the court that the request is granted and that respondent, Mark Mariotti, Attorney Registration No. 0067608, last known business address in Clev eland, Ohio, is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that the reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against him. {¶ 3} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). {¶ 4} For earlier case, see Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Mariotti , __ Ohio St.3d __, 2018-Ohio-4769, __ N.E.3d __. O’C ONNOR , C.J., and K ENNEDY , F RENCH , F ISCHER , D E W INE , D ONNELLY , and S TEWART , JJ., concur.

________________________
#### § 51.2959 Injury by discoloration.

*Injury by discoloration* means that the color of the affected portion of the shell objectionably contrasts with the color of the rest of the shell of the individual nut.