alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 51.1406 Tolerances. In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling in each of the foregoing grades, the following tolerances are provided as specified: ( a ) *U.S. Extra Fancy, U.S. Fancy, and U.S. Choice grades.* ( 1 ) For shell defects, by count: 5 percent for pecans with damaged shells, including therein not more than 2 percent for shells which are seriously damaged.
( 2 ) For kernel defects, by count: 12 percent for pecans with kernels which fail to meet the requirements for the grade or any specified color classification, including therein not more than 7 percent for kernels which are seriously damaged: *Provided,* That not more than 6 percent shall be allowed for kernels which are rancid, moldy, decayed, or injured by insects: *Provided further,* That included in this 6 percent tolerance not more than 0.5 percent (one-half of 1 percent) shall be allowed for pecans with live insects inside the shell.
( 3 ) For loose extraneous or foreign material, by weight: 0.5 percent (one-half of 1 percent).
( b ) *U.S. Standard grade.* ( 1 ) For shell defects, by count: 10 percent for pecans with damaged shells, including therein not more than 3 percent for shells which are seriously damaged.
( 2 ) For kernel defects, by count: 30 percent for pecans with kernels which fail to meet the requirements for the grade or any specified color classification, including therein not more than 10 percent for kernels which are seriously damaged: *Provided,* That not more than 7 percent shall be allowed for kernels which are rancid, moldy, decayed, or injured by insects: *Provided further,* That included in this 7 percent tolerance not more than 0.5 percent (one-half of 1 percent) shall be allowed for pecans with live insects inside the shell.
( 3 ) For loose extraneous or foreign material, by weight: 0.5 percent (one-half of 1 percent).
#### Walter A. Baron, Respondent, v. Eldridge Fleischer, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Rosalie Fleischer et al., Appellants, v. Walter A. Baron, Defendant. (Action No. 2.)

Appeal by plaintiffs Fleischer in Action No. 2 (Nassau County) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 8, 1968, which granted a motion by plaintiff Baron in Action No. 1 (Westchester County) to consolidate the actions for trial in Westchester County. Plaintiffs Fleischer had cross-moved to consolidate the actions for trial in Nassau County. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting therefrom the second and third decretal paragraphs and by substituting therefor similar paragraphs providing (1) for trial of the consolidated action in Nassau County, (2) for a transfer to the County Clerk of Nassau County of Westchester County Clerk’s file No. 13041-1968 for consolidation with Nassau County Clerk’s file No. 4711-1968 and (3) that plaintiffs Fleischer shall be accorded the privilege of opening and closing to the jury. As so modified, oi;der affirmed, with $10 costs to plaintiffs Fleischer against plaintiff Baron. In our opinion, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to fix the venue of the consolidated action in Westchester County. We also feel that plaintiffs Fleischer should be given the right to open and close to the jury. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2523 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Trifloxystrobin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Trifloxystrobin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIFLOXYSTROBIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.76. Methyl (E)-methoxyimino- 

{(E)-α-[1-(α,α,α-trifluorom-tolyl)ethylideneaminooxy]- 

o-tolyl}acetate 

(Trifloxystrobin) (CAS No. 

141517–21–7) (provided for 

in subheading 2929.90.20) .. 2.4% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 2523 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### § 51.1551 Firm.

*Firm* means that the potato is not shriveled or flabby.
26.303 Data collection and reporting requirements.       Executive Order12928 requires periodic reporting to the President on the progress of departments and agencies in complying with the laws and requirements mentioned in the Executive order.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 26.3 - Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions
#### § 51.781 Slightly spongy.

*Slightly spongy* means that the fruit is puffy or slightly wilted but not flabby.
#### § 5001.512 Additional expenditures and loans.

The lender shall not make additional expenditures on behalf of, or provide new loans to, the borrower without notification to the Agency even though such expenditures or loans will not be guaranteed. The lender shall not approve additional expenditures or new loans where the expenditure or loan will violate, or cause a violation of, any of the loan covenants in the borrower's loan agreement.
32.113 Customary contract financing.

The solicitation must specify the customary contract financing offerors may propose. The following

are customary contract financing when provided in accordance with this part and agency

regulations:

(a) Financing of shipbuilding, or ship conversion, alteration, or repair, when agency regulations

provide for progress payments based on a percentage or stage of completion.

(b) Financing of construction or architect-engineer services purchased under the authority of part 

36.

(c) Financing of contracts for supplies or services awarded under the sealed bid method of

procurement in accordance with part 14 through progress payments based on costs in accordance

with subpart 32.5.

(d) Financing of contracts for supplies or services awarded under the competitive negotiation

method of procurement in accordance with part 15, through either progress payments based on

costs in accordance with subpart 32.5, or performance-based payments in accordance with subpart 

32.10 (but not both).

(e) Financing of contracts for supplies or services awarded under a sole-source acquisition as

defined in 2.101 and using the procedures of part 15, through either progress payments based on

costs in accordance with subpart 32.5, or performance-based payments in accordance with subpart 

32.10 (but not both).

(f) Financing of contracts for supplies or services through advance payments in accordance with

subpart 32.4.

(g) Financing of contracts for supplies or services through guaranteed loans in accordance with

subpart 32.3.

(h) Financing of contracts for supplies or services through any appropriate combination of advance

payments, guaranteed loans, and either performance-based payments or progress payments (but not

both) in accordance with their respective subparts.

Parent topic: Subpart 32.1 - Financing for Other Than a Commercial Purchase
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 4:96-cr-00036-MP

EDDIE LEE GORDON,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on various motions. First, in Doc. 169, Mr. Gordon

moves to appeal in forma pauperis. This motion is denied as moot. The mandate of the United

States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit at Doc. 172 dismissed his appeal as untimely. 

Second, Doc. 173, Mr. Gordon's motion to vacate, should be terminated as the Court now grants

Doc. 174, his motion to withdraw that motion to vacate. 

Third, in Doc. 176, Mr. Gordon moves the Court to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2), based on Amendments 706, 711 and 715 to the United States Sentencing

Guidelines (“Guidelines”). However, Defendant was sentenced based upon 2.365 kilograms of

crack, which resulted in a Base Offense Level 38, and Total Offense Level 42. Because he had a

criminal history category VI, this resulted in a guideline range of 360-to-Life. Even if he were to

receive a two-level downward departure, this would still result in a guideline range of

360-to-Life. Because the amendment does not lower the guideline range applicable to this

defendant, § 1B1.10(a)(1) does not permit the Court to reduce the original sentence. Thus, Doc.

176 is denied. Additionally, this analysis is straightforward and thus release of the presentence

report is not likely to be helpful to Mr. Gordon. The motions to release the report, at Docs. 175

Case 4:96-cr-00036-RH-CAS Document 184 Filed 12/15/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:96-cr-00036-MP

and 177 are therefore denied. Finally, the motion to amend at Doc. 180 is granted; the Court has

considered the amended response by Mr. Gordon.

Accordingly it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The Motions at Docs. 169, 175, 176 and 177 are denied. The motion to withdraw at Doc.

174 is granted, and thus the motion at Doc. 173 is terminated. The motion to amend at

Doc. 180 is granted.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2008

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:96-cr-00036-RH-CAS Document 184 Filed 12/15/08 Page 2 of 2
34.203 Solicitation provisions and contract clause.       (a) 						            The contracting officer shall insert a provision that is substantially the same as the provision at FAR 52.234-2, Notice of Earned Value Management System-Preaward Integrated Baseline Review, in solicitations for contracts that require the contractor to use an Earned Value Management System (EVMS) and for which the Government requires an Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) prior to award.                                          (b) 						            The contracting officer shall insert a provision that is substantially the same as the provision at 52.234-3, Notice of Earned Value Management System-Postaward Integrated Baseline Review, in solicitations for contracts that require the contractor to use an Earned Value Management System (EVMS) and for which the Government requires an Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) after contract award.                                          (c) 						            The contracting officer shall insert a clause that is substantially the same as the clause at FAR 52.234-4, Earned Value Management System, in solicitations and contracts that require a contractor to use an EVMS.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 34.2 - Earned Value Management System
#### In the Matter of Rensselaer County Bar Association.

Application, pursuant to section 280 of the Penal Law, for approval of the incorporation of the Legal Aid 'Society of Rensselaer County granted. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur.
|                                                 |    | Jurisdiction |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------------|
| Katonah      Debt Advisors, L.L.C.(2)                |    | Delaware     |
| Kohlberg      Capital Funding LLC I                  |    | Delaware     |
| Katonah      Management Holdings LLC(2)              |    | Delaware     |
| Katonah      X Management LLC(2)(3)                  |    | Delaware     |
| Katonah      2007-I Management LLC(2)(3)             |    | Delaware     |
| Katonah      2008-II Management LLC(2)(3)            |    | Delaware     |
| Katonah      Scott’s Cove Management LLC(2)(3) |    | Delaware     |
| KPKSI      Management Holdings LLC(2)                |    | Delaware     |
| KPKSI      Holdings LLC(2)(4)                        |    | Delaware     |

----

| (1) | Excludes      a 35% interest in PKSIL LLC. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------|

| (2) | Represents      a wholly-owned portfolio company that is not consolidated for financial      reporting purposes. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (3) | A      wholly-owned subsidiary of Katonah Management Holdings  LLC. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (4) | A      wholly-owned subsidiary of KPKSI Management Holdings  LLC. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

llyou make dumgc:s to the l'ulues in the tul>le he/ow. you 11/USI unsUJ'!.! the totals updute occordingly. (!' 

they do not, dick lor Tuh) imo and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action 

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, _Qropeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) 

Do (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

I nspection/lnstall 

of wire bundle 1.6 $9.00 1270 

clamps. 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $184, 150 

Costs covered under warranty ( !f known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: ·• 

Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product Action (include access, (@$85/hour) (e.g., Inspection, testing, and closereplacement) up) 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): Boeing can 

supply the kit shown in Paragraph 2.C. of Service Bulletin SB737-29AI 1 19, Parts Necessary for 

Each Airplane. Operators are encouraged to share schedule requirements with Boeing for 

incorporation of the service bulletin. The kits are subject to the terms and conditions of the Boeing 

standard purchase order acknowledgment. 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a ·'significant regulatory acti on ?~ 

YES* D NO [g) 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 0 

YES* D NO [g) 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. G 

YES D NO [g) 

Explanation: 

Intr·astate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* D NO [g) 

*Explanation:
EX-35 (b)
(logo) AVELO
       MORTGAGE

Avelo Mortgage,

Annual Compliance Statement


Re: The Flow Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"),
among Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company and Avelo Mortgage, LLC and GSAA Home
Equity Trust 2006-14


1. A review has been completed of Avelo Mortgage, LLC's ("Avelo") servicing
activities and its performance under the servicing agreement during the period
from February 24, 2006 through December 31, 2006. This review was completed
under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Avelo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the agreement in all material respects, except as
described in the item below:

For a period of time in 2006, bank accounts were not reconciled in strict
compliance with Section 1122(d)(2)(vii) of Reg AB which provides as follows:

*    Reconciliations are prepared on a monthly basis for all asset-backed
     securities, related bank accounts, including custodial accounts and related
     bank clearing accounts. These reconciliations are (A) mathematically
     accurate; (B) prepared within 30 calendar days after the bank statement
     cutoff date, or such other number of days specified in the transaction
     agreements; (C) reviewed and approved by someone other than the person who
     prepared the reconciliation; and (D) contain explanations for reconciling
     items. These reconciling items are resolved within 90 calendar days of
     their original identification, or such other number of days specified in
     the transaction agreements.


The bank account reconciliations were current as of December 31, 2006, and no
issues were found or arose from the delay in reconciling the bank accounts.

I certify this information to be true and correct to the best of my ability.

/s/ James Weston Moffett
Name: James Weston Moffett
Title: President and CEO
Date: February 28, 2007

600 E. Las Colinas Blvd.   Suite 620   Irving, TX 75039   972.910.7000
F. 972.910.7099
#### In the Matter of Lewis Allinson and Julius M. Gerzof, Attorneys, Respondents. Samuel Greason, Petitioner.

On the court’s own motion, the decision slip dated December 19, 1966 (27 A D 2d 553) is amended so that the fifth paragraph thereof shall read as follows: The findings of Allinson’s guilt by the Beferee with respect to Specifications B, D and G are amply supported by the evidence and are sustained. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### Harvey Long, Respondent, *v.*Irving Gartner, Doing Business as G & G Construction Co., et al., Appellants.

Third Department,

April 21, 1969.

*26*Barry, McTiernan & Congdon (Roger P. McTiernan*of counsel), for appellants.

*Appelbaum & Eisenberg (Bertram W. Eisenberg*of counsel), for respondent.

Greenblott, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court entered upon a verdict in favor of plaintiff and against both defendants and from an order of said court, which denied defendants' motion to set aside the verdict.

Respondent was injured while employed as a laborer in the construction of a two-story building. Appellant Greenwood Estates, Inc., the owner, contracted with appellant G & G Construction Co., the general contractor, who, in turn, contracted with the Alfred Van Keuren Construction Co. and various other subcontractors for the construction of the building. Van Keuren was responsible for the carpentry and masonry work, while the others were to do the excavation, plumbing and heating, electrical work and painting. Respondent was employed by Van Keuren.

The building had progressed to the point where frames for stairwells had been installed. This left open and unprotected the areas encompassing these stairwells. Van Keuren's workers were nailing plywood sheets to beams supporting the second floor. It was respondent's job to carry the plywood sheets to the carpenters. The accident occurred near a stack of plywood piled partially over a stairwell opening. These sheets had been stacked for at least a day and a half prior to the accident. As respondent began to lift one of the sheets, he stepped on a piece of plywood which extended over the open stairwell and fell to the first floor. There were no railings or barriers placed around the stairwell opening’s after the first floor framing was completed.

The court, in addition to charging the general rules of negligence, charged the provisions of section 241 of the Labor Law and the applicable rules of the Board of Standards and Appeals. The court further charged that contributory negligence was not a defense to a violation of section 241 of the Labor Law, but that contributory negligence would be a defense to a violation of the rules of the Board of Standards and Appeals.

The decision of this court in *Corbett*v. *Brown*(32 A D 2d 27 [decided herewith] is determinative of this appeal. The charge of the trial court that contributory negligence was not a defense to a violation of section 241 was error. A new trial is therefore required.

*27The judgment should he reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

Gibson, P. J., Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and 'Cooke, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.
41.101 Definitions.

As used in this part,

Areawide contract means a contract entered into between the General Services Administration

(GSA) and a utility service supplier to cover utility service needs of Federal agencies within the

franchise territory of the supplier. Each areawide contract includes an "Authorization" form for

requesting service, connection, disconnection, or change in service.

Authorization means the document executed by the ordering agency and the utility supplier to order

service under an areawide contract.

Connection charge means all nonrecurring costs, whether refundable or nonrefundable, to be paid

by the Government to the utility supplier for the required connecting facilities, which are installed,

owned, operated, and maintained by the utility supplier (see Termination liability).

Delegated agency means an agency that has received a written delegation of authority from GSA to

contract for utility services for periods not exceeding tenyears (see 41.103(b)).

Federal Power and Water Marketing Agency means a Government entity that produces, manages,

transports, controls, and sells electrical and water supply service to customers.

Franchise territory means a geographical area that a utility supplier has a right to serve based upon

a franchise, a certificate of public convenience and necessity, or other legal means.

Intervention means action by GSA or a delegated agency to formally participate in a utility

regulatory proceeding on behalf of all Federal executive agencies.

Multiple service locations means the various locations or delivery points in the utility supplier’s

service area to which it provides service under a single contract.

Rates may include rate schedules, riders, rules, terms and conditions of service, and other tariff and

service charges, e.g., facilities use charges.

Separate contract means a utility services contract (other than a GSA areawide contract, an

Authorization under an areawide contract, or an interagency agreement), to cover the acquisition of

utility services.

Termination liability means a contingent Government obligation to pay a utility supplier the

unamortized portion of a connection charge and any other applicable nonrefundable service charge

as defined in the contract in the event the Government terminates the contract before the cost of

connection facilities has been recovered by the utility supplier (see "Connection charge").

Utility service means a service such as furnishing electricity, natural or manufactured gas, water,

sewerage, thermal energy, chilled water, steam, hot water, or high temperature hot water. The

application of part 41 to other services (e.g., rubbish removal, snow removal) may be appropriate

when the acquisition is not subject to the 41 U.S.C. chapter 67, Service Contract Labor Standards

(see 37.107).

Parent topic: Subpart 41.1 - General