alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 1 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 2 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 3 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 4 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 5 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 6 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 7 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 8 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 9 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 10 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 11 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 12 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 13 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 14 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 15 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 16 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 17 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 18 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 19 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 20 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 21 of 22
Case 5:02-cv-00023-MP Document 1 Filed 01/11/02 Page 22 of 22
#### § 51.9 When application may be rejected.

An application may be rejected by the inspector in charge of the appropriate office of inspection if the applicant objects to the inspector cutting an adequate number of specimens to determine the interior quality or condition of the product to be inspected, or for failure of the applicant (a) to observe the regulations of this part, (b) to furnish necessary information or to make the commodity reasonably available or accessible for inspection, (c) to pay for previous inspection services rendered, or (d) when it appears that to perform the inspection and certification service would not be to the best interest of the Government. Such applicant shall be notified promptly of the reason for such rejection.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SALLIE POWELL

VS CASE NO. 4:20-cv-00404-RH-MJF

HOSPITAL HOUSEKEEPING

SYSTEMS LLC

JUDGMENT

The parties are ordered to comply with their settlement agreement. All claims in this

case are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice. The court reserves jurisdiction to enforce

the order to comply with the settlement agreement.

 December 9, 2020

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT

s/Betsy Breeden

DATE Deputy Clerk: Betsy Breeden

Case 4:20-cv-00404-RH-MJF Document 17 Filed 12/09/20 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 3.1 B 

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                           TRANSMONTAIGNE OIL COMPANY

                                        
TransMontaigne Oil Company, a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation")

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT:

FIRST:  That pursuant to unanimous written consent dated June 3, 1998 of the
Board of Directors of the Corporation, resolutions were duly adopted setting
forth a proposed amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and further declaring that
said amendment be presented to the stockholders of the Corporation at the next
Annual Meeting of Stockholders for consideration thereof. The resolution setting
forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

RESOLVED, that the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be
amended by changing Article II thereof so that, as amended, said Article shall
be and read as follows:

             "The name of the Corporation is TransMontaigne Inc."

SECOND:  That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, at
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Corporation, duly called and held upon
notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by
statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

THIRD:   That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions
of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

FOURTH:  That the capital of the Corporation shall not be reduced under or by
reason of said amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TransMontaigne Oil Company has caused this Certificate to be
executed by Erik B. Carlson, its authorized officer, on this 26th day of August,
1998.



                              /s/ Erik B. Carlson
                              ------------------------------------------
                              Erik B. Carlson, Senior Vice President and
                              Corporate Secretary
EXHIBIT
10.01


 


[Entercom
Letterhead]


 


	
  TO:

  	
   

  	
  David J. Field
  (“Employee”)

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  FROM:

  	
   

  	
  John C. Donlevie
  [sign
  here]

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  DATE:

  	
   

  	
  January 20,
  2009

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  RE:

  	
   

  	
  Waiver of
  Scheduled CPI Salary Increase

  



 


This Memorandum
will confirm our agreement regarding the schedule 2009 CPI increase to your
salary pursuant to the employment agreement (the “Agreement”)
between you (the “Employee”) and
Entercom Communications Corp. (the “Company”).


 


Waiver.  Employee
hereby agrees that the scheduled CPI increase to Employee’s base salary due
under the Agreement on July 1, 2009 will not take effect.


 


Miscellaneous. 
This Memorandum constitutes the entire agreement and understanding
between Employee and the Company concerning the subject matter hereof.  No other written or oral agreements or
promises have been made with respect to entering into this Memorandum.  All terms and provisions of the Agreement not
expressly modified by this Memorandum remain in full force and effect and are
binding on the Employee and the Company. 
This Memorandum does not, and shall not be deemed to, extend the term of
Employee’s employment with the Company as set forth in the Agreement.


 


For consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to
be legally bound, Employee has executed this Memorandum.


 


	
  ACCEPTED &
  AGREED TO:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ David J.
  Field

  	
   

  
	
  Print Name:

  	
  David J. Field

  	
   

  
	
  Date:

  	
  January 20,
  2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000797324
<NAME>                        LASERGATE SYSTEMS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                        1,924,825
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                   868,931
<ALLOWANCES>                    147,000
<INVENTORY>                     254,901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              3,089,623
<PP&E>                          579,457
<DEPRECIATION>                  275,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                6,436,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         3,180,392
<BONDS>                               0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0 
<PREFERRED>                         240 
<COMMON>                        222,561
<OTHER-SE>                    2,895,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  6,436,945
<SALES>                       4,024,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              4,024,626
<CGS>                         3,104,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 6,083,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                (67,674)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               53,577
<INCOME-PRETAX>              (4,997,962)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          (4,997,962) 
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                 (4,997,962)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (1.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0 
        





</TABLE>
#### § 51.30 Who shall perform appeal inspections.

Appeal inspections shall be performed by an inspector or inspectors authorized for this purpose by the Administrator and whenever practical, such appeal inspections shall be made by two inspectors.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1564

CAROL M. FORBES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARVIN T. RUNYON, JR., Postmaster General, CEO

US Postal Service,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-95-14-5-H)

Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 16, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carol M. Forbes, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Carol M. Forbes appeals the district court's orders adopting

the magistrate judge's report and recommendation to grant Defendant

summary judgment in this action filed pursuant to Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) (1994).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. Forbes v. Runyon, No. CA-95-14-5-H (E.D.N.C.

Jan. 14, 1997, and Mar. 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2249 

To eliminate the requirement that States collect Social Security numbers 

from applicants for recreational licenses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2006 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To eliminate the requirement that States collect Social 

Security numbers from applicants for recreational licenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sportsmen’s Privacy 

5 Protection Act’’. 
2 

•S 2249 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF REQUIREMENT THAT STATES COL2 LECT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS FROM AP3 PLICANTS FOR RECREATIONAL LICENSES. 

4 Section 466(a)(13)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 666(a)(13)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘rec6 reational license,’’. 

Æ
#### Louis Kunzig, Jr., Respondent, v Nassau County et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action for a judgment declaring that defendant Nassau County and/or defendant Nassau County OAS Motor Equipment must defend and indemnify plaintiff in a certain personal injury action, said defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 14, 1980, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, on the law, and motion denied, without costs or disbursements. The critical issue in this case is whether, at the time of the accident, plaintiff was acting in the discharge of his duties and within the scope of his employment with the defendant County of Nassau (see General Municipal Law, § 50-b). This question is ordinarily one for the trier of the fact (see *Riviello v Waldron/*47 NY2d 297) and we see nothing which *694removes this case from the ordinary rule. Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

Certification of PrincipalFinancial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/Afor the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) of Federal ServicesAcquisition Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Peter M. Schulte, President andChief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Date:  December 5, 2006 | By:    | /s/    Peter M. Schulte |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                    |   | **Peter M. Schulte**                        |
|                    |   | **President and Chief Financial Officer**   |
|                    |   | **(Principal Financial Officer)**           |

 

1

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Estes, 7:20cv137

Hacker, 7:20cv131

Keefer, 7:20cv104

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

EXHIBITS ORDER NO. 8

This Order amends Exhibits Order No. 6 with respect to D-GEN-0250. 

Plaintiffs’ objections D-GEN-0250 are sustained.

SO ORDERED, on this 16th day of April, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00137-MCR-GRJ Document 159 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2 

Case No.: 3:20cv5854/LAC/EMT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

PHILLIP TODD TUCKER, 

Inmate No. 2259, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5854/LAC/EMT 

OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD 

OF COMMISSIONERS, et al., 

 Defendants. 

_______________________________/ 

ORDER

 The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on May 3, 

2021 (ECF No. 7). Efforts were made to furnish all parties a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and to afford all an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Mail to Plaintiff was returned marked 

“not in jail.” 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined the 

Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 

 1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 7) 

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 
Page 2 of 2 

Case No.: 3:20cv5854/LAC/EMT

2. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to 

state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 

 3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of July, 2021. 

 

 LACEY A. COLLIER 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier
25.406 Israeli Trade Act.

Acquisitions of supplies by most agencies are covered by the Israeli Trade Act, if the estimated value

of the acquisition is $50,000 or more but does not exceed the WTO GPA threshold for supplies (see

25.402(b)). Agencies other than the Department of Defense, the Department of Energy, the

Department of Transportation, the Bureau of Reclamation of the Department of the Interior, the

Federal Housing Finance Board, and the Office of Thrift Supervision must evaluate offers of Israeli

end products without regard to the restrictions of the Buy American statute. The Israeli Trade Act

does not prohibit the purchase of other foreign end products.

Parent topic: Subpart 25.4 - Trade Agreements
#### § 42.134 Disposition of rejected portions of production.

Rejected portions of production from the same basic inspection period may be reworked, combined together to form a lot, and resubmitted for inspection under the criteria for tightened inspection using stationary lot sampling procedures described in subpart B of this part.
Exhibit 32



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



In connection with the Report of Material Sciences Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald L. Stewart, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



January 10, 2005By:

/s/ Ronald L. StewartRonald L. StewartPresident, Chief Executive Officerand Director




In connection with the Report,
I, Jeffrey J. Siemers, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



January 10, 2005By:

/s/ Jeffrey J. SiemersJeffrey J. SiemersVice President,Chief Financial Officerand Secretary




38
25.1103 Other provisions and clauses.

(a) Restrictions on certain foreign purchases. Insert the clause at 52.225-13, Restrictions on Certain

Foreign Purchases, in solicitations and contracts, unless an exception applies.

(b) Translations. Insert the clause at 52.225-14, Inconsistency Between English Version and

Translation of Contract, in solicitations and contracts if anticipating translation into another

language.

(c) Foreign currency offers. Insert the provision at 52.225-17, Evaluation of Foreign Currency Offers,

in solicitations that permit the use of other than a specified currency. Insert in the provision the

source of the rate to be used in the evaluation of offers.

(d) The contracting officer shall include in each solicitation for the acquisition of other than

commercial products or commercial services the provision at 52.225-20, Prohibition on Conducting

Restricted Business Operations in Sudan—Certification.

(e) The contracting officer shall include in all solicitations the provision at 52.225-25, Prohibition on

Contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain Activities or Transactions Relating to IranRepresentation and Certifications.

Parent topic: Subpart 25.11 - Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses
Order entered July 21 , 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 91

- 01392

- CR

ALFRED LEE STONE

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

No. 05

- 1 5

- 0 0661

- C V

IN RE A LFRED LEE STONE

, Relator



## ORDER

The Court DENIES ap pellant’s July 20 , 2015 pro se motion s to forward the records in

the above cases to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
# 22.2110 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.222-62, *Paid Sick Leave* Under Executive Order 13706, in *solicitations* and contracts that include the clause at 52.222-6, *Construction* Wage Rate Requirements, or 52.222-41, *Service Contract* Labor Standards, where work is to be performed, in whole or in part, in the *United States* (the 50 States and the District of Columbia).

**Parent topic:**Subpart 22.21 - Establishing Paid Sick Leave For Federal Contractors
|   | (1)  such      Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  the      information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,      2009, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of National Bankshares,  Inc. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ DAVID K. SKEENS                                                    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| David      K. SkeensTreasurer      andChief      Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer) |
23.903 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.223-19, Compliance With Environmental

Management Systems, in all solicitations and contracts for contractor operation of Governmentowned or -leased facilities or vehicles, located in the United States. For facilities located outside the

United States, the agency head may determine that use of the clause is in the best interest of the

Government.

Parent topic: Subpart 23.9 - Contractor Compliance with Environmental Management Systems
###### Editorial Note on Part 1942

#### Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1942 appear at 80 FR 9878, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1942.113 Rates and terms.

Rates and terms for loans under this subpart are as set out in § 1942.17(f) of subpart A of this part 1942.
#### In the Matter of Samuel Stone, an Attorney.

Determination of petition of the Departmental Disciplinary Committee held in abeyance, a reference ordered and pending receipt of Referee’s report, respondent is suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor at law effective as of the date of this court’s order, all as indicated therein. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Birns, Sullivan, Ross and Carro, JJ.