alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             265
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       92
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   116
<PP&E>                                          11,822
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              255
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   440
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   291
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (11)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
17.000 Scope of part.       This part prescribes policies and procedures for the acquisition of supplies and services through special contracting methods, including-                                       (a) 						            Multi-year contracting;                                          (b) 						            Options; and                                          (c) 						            Leader company contracting.    **Parent topic:** Part 17 - Special Contracting Methods
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 5, 2011

t0928 

# Order

October 5, 2011

143054

LORI MAINKA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 143054 COA: 299141 Alpena CC: 10-003203-NI CODY LAPCZYNSKI, GARY LAPCZYNSKI, and AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the April 1, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY 

### , J., would grant leave to appeal.
32.006-1 General.       (a) Under                       10 U.S.C. 3806(j), the statutory authority implemented by this section is available to the Department of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; this statutory authority is not available to the United States Coast Guard. Under 41 U.S.C. 4506, this statutory authority is available to all agencies subject to Division C of subtitle I of title 41.                                          (b)                   10 U.S.C. 3806(c)                                          and 41 U.S.C. 4506 provide for a reduction or suspension of further payments to a contractor when the agency head determines there is substantial evidence that the contractor's request for advance, partial, or progress payments is based on fraud. This authority does not apply to commercial interim payments under subpart  32.2, or performance-based payments under subpart  32.10.                                          (c) 						            The agency head may not delegate his or her responsibilities under these statutes below Level IV of the Executive Schedule.                                          (d) 						            Authority to reduce or suspend payments under these statutes is in addition to other Government rights, remedies, and procedures.                                          (e) 						            In accordance with these statutes, agency head determinations and decisions under this section may be made for an individual contract or any group of contracts affected by the fraud.    **Parent topic:** 32.006 Reduction or suspension of contract payments upon finding of fraud.
37.113-2 Solicitation provision and contract

clause.

(a) Use the provision at 52.237-8, Restriction on Severance Payments to Foreign Nationals, in all

solicitations that meet the criteria in 37.113-1(a), except for those excluded by 37.113-1(c).

(b) When the head of an agency has granted a waiver pursuant to 37.113-1, use the clause at

52.237-9, Waiver of Limitation on Severance Payments to Foreign Nationals.

Parent topic: 37.113 Severance payments to foreign nationals.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

Civil Hearing Minutes

Honorable Hope T. Cannon, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case Style: IN RE: Skanska USA Civil Southeast Inc and Skanska USA Inc 

Case No.: 3:20-cv-5980/LAC-HTC

Date: June 30, 2021

Hearing: Discovery Status Conference

__________________________________________________________________

Time Commenced: 10:00 a.m. Time Concluded: 11:20 a.m. 

Court Reporter: David Deik, Phipps Court Reporting

Attorneys present for Petitioners:

Jeremy Branning

Elizabeth Billhimer

Attorneys present for Claimants:

Brian Barr

Nicole (Nicki) Guntner

Sam Geisler

Tom Gonzalez

Jeff Gill

Stephen Echsner

Eric Stevenson

Attorneys Participating telephonically:

Robert Kelly, AUSA, DOJ

Charles Blanchard, Skanska

Robb Hyde, AUSA, DOJ

PROCEEDINGS:

10:00 a.m. Court in session.

Status conference on matters relating to discovery.

11:20 a.m. Court adjourned.

__________________

Filed in Open Court/DCR

 June 30, 2021 

Deputy Clerk: Keri Igney

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1200 Filed 06/30/21 Page 1 of 1
# 27.202-4 Refund of royalties.

The clause at 52.227-9, Refund of Royalties, establishes procedures to pay the contractor royalties under the contract and recover royalties not paid by the contractor when the royalties were included in the contractor’s fixed price.

**Parent topic:**27.202 Royalties.
Exhibit 4.3


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


     We consent to the reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus and to the use of our report dated May 12, 2009, in this Registration
Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-158979) of Smart Trust, Diversified Dividend Trust (2009 Series C).

		
	 	/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

	 	GRANT THORNTON LLP





New York, New York

May 12, 2009
§ 51.1817 U.S. No. 2. “U.S. No. 2” consists of tangerines which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Discoloration: Not more than one-half of the surface, in the aggregate, may be affected by discoloration. (See § 51.1828.);
( 2 ) Fairly firm;
( 3 ) Fairly well formed;
( 4 ) Mature; and
( 5 ) Reasonably well colored.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Decay;
( 2 ) Unhealed skin breaks; and,
( 3 ) Wormy fruit.
( c ) Free from serious damage caused by: ( 1 ) Ammoniation;
( 2 ) Bruises;
( 3 ) Buckskin;
( 4 ) Caked melanose;
( 5 ) Creasing;
( 6 ) Dirt or other foreign material;
( 7 ) Disease;
( 8 ) Dryness or mushy condition;
( 9 ) Green spots;
( 10 ) Hail;
( 11 ) Insects;
( 12 ) Oil spots;
( 13 ) Scab;
( 14 ) Scale;
( 15 ) Scars;
( 16 ) Skin breakdown;
( 17 ) Sprayburn;
( 18 ) Sunburn; and
( 19 ) Other means.
( d ) For tolerances see § 51.1820.
#### § 56.18 Schedule of operation of official plants.

Grading operating schedules for services performed pursuant to §§ 56.52 and 56.54 shall be requested in writing and be approved by the Administrator. Normal operating schedules for a full week consist of a continuous 8-hour period per day (excluding not to exceed 1 hour for lunch), 5 consecutive days per week, within the administrative workweek, Sunday through Saturday, for each shift required. Less than 8-hour schedules may be requested and will be approved if a grader is available. Clock hours of daily operations need not be specified in the request, although as a condition of continued approval, the hours of operation shall be reasonably uniform from day to day. Graders are to be notified by management 1 day in advance of any change in the hours grading service is requested.

[48 FR 20683, May 9, 1983]
**TERMINATION AGREEMENT******

(Oak Terrace Joint Venture, L.P. Project)

 

This Termination Agreement (the “**Agreement**”) is made this 29th day of December, 2006 by and among EVEREST HICKORY GLEN, LP (formerly known as OAK TERRACE JOINT VENTURE, L.P.) a Kansas limited partnership (the “**Borrower**”); SECURED INVESTMENT RESOURCES FUND, L.P. II, a Delaware limited partnership and limited partner of the Borrower (the “**Limited Partner**”); CREDIT SUISSE (formerly Credit Suisse First Boston), acting by and through its New York branch (“**Credit Suisse**”); and CREDITRE MORTGAGE CAPITAL, L.L.C. a Delaware limited liability company (“**Credit Re**,” and together with Borrower, the Limited Partner andCredit Suisse, the “**Parties**,” and each a “**Party**”).

 

**RECITALS**

 

WHEREAS, the Borrower owns a multifamily active retirement apartment facility and related personal property and equipment located at 1700 West Washington, Springfield, Illinois, the development of which was financed with the proceeds of those certain bonds issued by the City of Springfield, Illinois and known as $9,000,000 Community Improvement Adjustable Demand Revenue Bonds, Series 1999 (Oak Terrace Joint Venture, L.P. Project), (the “Bonds”); 

 

WHEREAS, Oak Terrace Venture, Inc., a Kansas corporation, was the general partner of Oak Terrace Joint Venture, L.P. and was replaced as general partner by Millenium Management, LLC, a California limited liability company;

 

WHEREAS, Millenium Management, LLC was replaced as the general partner of Oak Terrace Joint Venture, L.P. by one of its affiliates, Millenium Oak Terrace, LLC, a California limited liability company;

 

WHEREAS, James R. Hoyt and Secured Investment Resources II, Inc., a Kansas corporation, were the general partners of the Limited Partner and were replaced as such by Millenium Management, LLC, a California limited liability company;

 

WHEREAS, Oak Terrace Joint Venture, L.P. changed its name to Everest Hickory Glen, LP;

 

WHEREAS, Credit Re arranged for the delivery by Credit Suisse First Boston (predecessor-in-interest to Credit Suisse), in support of the Bonds, of its irrevocable Letter of Credit No TR-07001288 (the “Letter of Credit”);

 

WHEREAS, in connection with the issuance of the Letter of Credit, each Party has executed one or more of the agreements listed on Schedule 1 attached hereto and more fully defined thereon (each a “Loan Document” and collectively, the “Loan Documents”);

 

----
52.204-11 [Reserved]

Parent topic: 52.204 [Reserved]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
 CERTIFICATION OF DR. RALPH S. CUNNINGHAM, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF EPE HOLDINGS, LLC, THE GENERAL PARTNER OF
ENTERPRISE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 /s/ Dr. Ralph S. CunninghamName:
    
    Dr. Ralph S. CunninghamTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer of EPE Holdings, LLCon behalf of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.Date:
    
    August 9, 2007
§ 51.627 U.S. No. 3. “U.S. No. 3” consists of grapefruit which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Mature;
( 2 ) May be misshapen;
( 3 ) May be slightly spongy;
( 4 ) May have rough texture;
( 5 ) May be poorly colored. Not more than 25 percent of the surface may be of a solid dark green color;
( 6 ) Not seriously lumpy or cracked; and
( 7 ) Similar varietal characteristics.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Decay;
( 2 ) Unhealed skin breaks; and
( 3 ) Wormy fruit.
( c ) Free from very serious damage caused by: ( 1 ) Ammoniation;
( 2 ) Buckskin;
( 3 ) Caked melanose;
( 4 ) Dryness or mushy condition;
( 5 ) Green spots;
( 6 ) Hail;
( 7 ) Oil spots;
( 8 ) Scab;
( 9 ) Scale;
( 10 ) Scars;
( 11 ) Skin breakdown;
( 12 ) Sprayburn;
( 13 ) Sprouting;
( 14 ) Sunburn;
( 15 ) Thorn scratches; and
( 16 ) Other means.
( d ) For tolerances see § 51.628.
[85 FR 68423, Oct. 29, 2020]
#### § 51.2736 Split.

*Split* means the separated half of a peanut kernel.
156 So.2d 607

#### DAVIS-DELCAMBRE MOTORS, INC. v. Martin SIMON.

No. 46923.

Oct. 10, 1963.

Court of Appeal, Third Circuit.

154 So.2d 775.

It- is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the *74record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
36.515 Schedules for construction contracts.

The contracting officer may insert the clause at 52.236-15, Schedules for Construction Contracts, in

solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract is contemplated, the contract

amount is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, and the period of actual work

performance exceeds 60 days. This clause may also be inserted in such solicitations and contracts

when work performance is expected to last less than 60 days and an unusual situation exists that

warrants imposition of the requirements. This clause should not be used in the same contract with

clauses covering other management approaches for ensuring that a contractor makes adequate

progress.

Parent topic: Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DARNELL P. WASHINGTON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5962-MCR/MAF

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

 ___ /

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the 

U.S. Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 3, that the case be transferred to the United States

District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division. The parties 

have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been 

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I have 

made a de novo determination of any objections timely filed. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections filed 

thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 3, is adopted and incorporated 

by reference in this Order. 

Case 3:20-cv-05962-MCR-MAF Document 4 Filed 01/19/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cr5962-MCR/MAF

2. The Clerk is directed to transfer the case to the United States District Court 

for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of January 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05962-MCR-MAF Document 4 Filed 01/19/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 51.2339 Definitions.

*Similar varietal characteristics* means the fruit in any lot and container are similar in shape, color of skin and flesh.

*Mature* means the fruit has reached the stage of development which will ensure the proper completion of the ripening process. The minimum average soluble solids, unless otherwise specified, shall be not less than 6.5 percent.

*Clean* means the fruit is practically free from dirt, dust, or other foreign material.

*Fairly clean* means the fruit is reasonably free from dirt, dust, or other foreign material.

*Well formed* means the fruit has the shape characteristic of the variety and slight bumps or other roughness are permitted providing they do not detract from the appearance.

*Fairly well formed* means the fruit has the shape characteristic of the variety but slight bumps or other roughness are permitted providing they do not materially detract from appearance.

*Badly misshapen* means the fruit is so decidely deformed that its appearance is seriously affected.

*Carefully packed* means the fruit shows no evidence of rough handling.

*Injury* means any defect described in § 51.2340, or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which more than slightly detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality.

*Damage* means any defect described in § 51.2340 or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which materially detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality.

*Serious damage* means any defect described in § 51.2340 or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which seriously detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality.

*Permanent defects* means those which are not subject to change during shipment or storage, for example, shape, scars, or growth cracks.

*Condition defects* means those defects which are subject to change during shipment or storage, for example, decay, soft, shriveling, discoloration, or bruises.

[47 FR 34513, Aug. 10, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 40186, Oct. 2, 1985; 51 FR 36682, Oct. 15, 1986; 51 FR 4293, Feb. 4, 1986]
#### § 52.47 Changing types of service.

If an applicant cancels a new year-round contract before a full year has elapsed, the applicant shall be charged the difference between the year-round rate and less than year-round rate for the full period the year-round contract was in effect. If an applicant cancels a year-round contract after a full year or more of uninterrupted service, the fee remains at the year-round rate.

[59 FR 41378, Aug. 12, 1994]
Wells
Fargo

                                                   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
                                                   Document Custody
                                                   1015 10th Avenue SE
                                                   Minneapolis, MN 55414


                                                   Appendix I


           ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for
the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after
January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides document custody services,
excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by
the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). The Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform, the Company provides the following assessment of
compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for
the Period.




                                WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
                                By: /s/ Shari L. Gillund
                                -------------------------------------
                                Shari L. Gillund

                                Its: Senior Vice President

                                Dated: March 1, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 74127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7250]


In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of Islamic 
Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU and Other Aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist 
Organization Pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in 
consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the 
Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the 
2004 re-designation of the aforementioned organization as a foreign 
terrorist organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant 
revocation of the designation and that the national security of the 
United States does not warrant a revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: November 15, 2010.
James B. Steinberg,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-30123 Filed 11-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P