alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
52.225-6 Trade Agreements Certificate.       As prescribed in 25.1101(c)(2), insert the following provision:          Trade Agreements Certificate (Feb 2021)                                       (a)                    The offeror certifies that each end product, except those listed in paragraph (b) of this provision, is a U.S.-made or designated country end product, as defined in the clause of this solicitation entitled "Trade Agreements."                                          (b)                    The offeror shall list as other end products those supplies that are not U.S.-made or designated country end products.                Other End Products:                Line Item No.                            Country of Origin______________                            _______________________________                            _______________________________                            _________________[*List as necessary*]                                          (c)                    The Government will evaluate offers in accordance with the policies and procedures of part  25 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation. For line items covered by the WTO GPA, the Government will evaluate offers of U.S.-made or designated country end products without regard to the restrictions of the Buy American statute. The Government will consider for award only offers of U.S.-made or designated country end products unless the Contracting Officer determines that there are no offers for such products or that the offers for those products are insufficient to fulfill the requirements of this solicitation.                                 (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.225 [Reserved]
§ 51.622 U.S. No. 1 Bright. The requirements for this grade are the same as for U.S. No. 1 except that no fruit may have more than one-tenth of its surface, in the aggregate, affected by discoloration. ( a ) For tolerances see § 51.628.
```

[House Report 107-781]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-781

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
  333, BANKRUPTCY ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT OF 2001

                                _______
                                

 November  13, 2002.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 606]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 606, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 333, the Bankruptcy Abuse 
Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2001, and against its 
consideration.


```
#### § 51.2130 Diameter.

*Diameter* means the greatest dimension of the kernel, or piece of kernel at right angles to the longitudinal axis. Diameter shall be determined by passing the kernel or piece of kernel through a round opening.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 3:20cr64/MCR

MIGUEL A. COLINDRES-ACOSTA

_________________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of the

Defendant, MIGUEL A. COLINDRES-ACOSTA, to Counts One and Two of the

indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for

sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of October 2020. 

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00064-MCR Document 25 Filed 10/30/20 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

FREDERICK JOHN GAILOR, JR.

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5987-MCR-EMT

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on

December 17, 2020. ECF No. 5. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report 

and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of 

all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-05987-MCR-EMT Document 6 Filed 02/01/21 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 3:20cv5987-MCR-EMT

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 5,

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice as frivolous. 

3. The clerk of court is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of February 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05987-MCR-EMT Document 6 Filed 02/01/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 51.309 Condition after storage or transit.

Decay, scald, or any other deterioration which may have developed on apples after they have been in storage or transit shall be considered as affecting condition and not the grade.
49.202 Profit.

(a) The TCO shall allow profit on preparations made and work done by the contractor for the

terminated portion of the contract but not on the settlement expenses. Anticipatory profits and

consequential damages shall not be allowed (but see 49.108-5). Profit for the contractor’s efforts in

settling subcontractor proposals shall not be based on the dollar amount of the subcontract

settlement agreements but the contractor’s efforts will be considered in determining the overall rate

of profit allowed the contractor. Profit shall not be allowed the contractor for material or services

that, as of the effective date of termination, have not been delivered by a subcontractor, regardless

of the percentage of completion. The TCO may use any reasonable method to arrive at a fair profit.

(b) In negotiating or determining profit, factors to be considered include-

(1) Extent and difficulty of the work done by the contractor as compared with the total work

required by the contract (engineering estimates of the percentage of completion ordinarily should

not be required, but if available should be considered);

(2) Engineering work, production scheduling, planning, technical study and supervision, and other

necessary services;

(3) Efficiency of the contractor, with particular regard to-

(i) Attainment of quantity and quality production;

(ii) Reduction of costs;

(iii) Economic use of materials, facilities, and manpower; and

(iv) Disposition of termination inventory;

(4) Amount and source of capital and extent of risk assumed;

(5) Inventive and developmental contributions, and cooperation with the Government and other

contractors in supplying technical assistance;

(6) Character of the business, including the source and nature of materials and the complexity of

manufacturing techniques;

(7) The rate of profit that the contractor would have earned had the contract been completed;

(8) The rate of profit both parties contemplated at the time the contract was negotiated; and

(9) Character and difficulty of subcontracting, including selection, placement, and management of

subcontracts, and effort in negotiating settlements of terminated subcontracts.

(c) When computing profit on the terminated portion of a construction contract, the contracting

officer shall-

(1) Comply with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section;

(2) Allow profit on the prime contractor’s settlements with construction subcontractors for actual

work in place at the job site; and
(3) Exclude profit on the prime contractor’s settlements with construction subcontractors for

materials on hand and for preparations made to complete the work.

Parent topic: Subpart 49.2 - Additional Principles for Fixed-Price Contracts Terminated for

Convenience
52.211-6 Brand Name or Equal.       As prescribed in 11.107(a), insert the following provision:          Brand Name or Equal (Aug 1999)                                       (a) 						            If an item in this solicitation is identified as "brand name or equal," the purchase description reflects the characteristics and level of quality that will satisfy the Government’s needs. The salient physical, functional, or performance characteristics that "equal" products must meet are specified in the solicitation.                                          (b) 						            To be considered for award, offers of "equal" products, including "equal" products of the brand name manufacturer, must-                                                         (1) 								                Meet the salient physical, functional, or performance characteristic specified in this solicitation;                                                            (2) 								                Clearly identify the item by-                                                                           (i) 										                    Brand name, if any; and                                                                              (ii) 										                    Make or model number;                                                                                                           (3) 								                Include descriptive literature such as illustrations, drawings, or a clear reference to previously furnished descriptive data or information available to the Contracting Officer; and                                                            (4) 								                Clearly describe any modifications the offeror plans to make in a product to make it conform to the solicitation requirements. Mark any descriptive material to clearly show the modifications.                                                                             (c) 						            The Contracting Officer will evaluate "equal" products on the basis of information furnished by the offeror or identified in the offer and reasonably available to the Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer is not responsible for locating or obtaining any information not identified in the offer.                                          (d) 						            Unless the offeror clearly indicates in its offer that the product being offered is an "equal" product, the offeror shall provide the brand name product referenced in the solicitation.                                 (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.211 [Reserved]
#### § 53.9 Order of furnishing service.

Service under the regulations shall be furnished to applicants in the order in which requests therefor are received, insofar as consistent with good management, efficiency and economy. Precedence will be given, when necessary, to requests made by any government agency or any regular user of the service.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER JON PERGROSSI,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-201-AW-GRJ

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This is one of the many frivolous pro se cases Christopher Jon Pergrossi has 

recently filed in this court. I have considered the magistrate judge’s omnibus order 

to show cause and report and recommendation. ECF No. 4. No objections were 

filed.* I agree with the magistrate judge that the action is frivolous and has wasted 

court resources. On the issue of sanctions, the judge in the first-filed case found it to 

be a close call but did not impose sanctions. See No. 1:20-cv-181-MW-GRJ, ECF 

No. 7. I will likewise not impose sanctions at this time.

The clerk will enter judgment that says, “This case is DISMISSED without 

leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).” The clerk will close the file.

* In another of his cases, Pergrossi filed an objection to the omnibus Report 

and Recommendation. See No. 1:20-cv-181-MW-GRJ, ECF No. 6. Although he did 

not file that objection (or any objection) in this case, I have nonetheless considered 

de novo the issues raised in that objection. 

Case 1:20-cv-00201-AW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 10/05/20 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED on October 5, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00201-AW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 10/05/20 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 03/10/21 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 03/10/21 Page 2 of 12
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 03/10/21 Page 3 of 12
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 03/10/21 Page 4 of 12
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 03/10/21 Page 5 of 12
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 03/10/21 Page 6 of 12
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 03/10/21 Page 7 of 12
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 03/10/21 Page 8 of 12
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 03/10/21 Page 9 of 12
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 03/10/21 Page 10 of 12
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 03/10/21 Page 11 of 12
Case 3:20-cv-05950-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 03/10/21 Page 12 of 12
§ 4279.125 Interest rates. The interest rate for the guaranteed loan will be negotiated between the lender and the borrower and may be either fixed or variable, or a combination thereof, as long as it is a legal rate. Interest rates will not be more than those rates customarily charged borrowers for loans without guarantees and are subject to Agency review and approval. Lenders are encouraged to utilize the secondary market and pass interest-rate savings on to the borrower. ( a ) A variable interest rate must be a rate that is tied to a published base rate, published in a national or regional financial publication, agreed to by the lender and the Agency. The variable interest rate must be specified in the promissory note and may be adjusted at different intervals during the term of the loan, but the adjustments may not be more often than quarterly. The lender must incorporate, within the variable rate promissory note at loan closing, the provision for adjustment of payment installments. The lender must fully amortize the outstanding principal balance within the prescribed loan maturity in order to eliminate the possibility of a balloon payment at the end of the loan.
( b ) It is permissible to have different interest rates on the guaranteed and unguaranteed portions of the loan provided that the rate of the guaranteed portion does not exceed the rate on the unguaranteed portion, except for situations where a fixed rate on the guaranteed portion becomes a higher rate than the variable rate on the unguaranteed portion due to the normal fluctuations in the approved variable interest rate.
( c ) Any change in the base rate or fixed interest rate between issuance of Form RD 4279-3, “Conditional Commitment,” and Form RD 4279-5 must be approved in writing by the Agency. Approval of such change must be shown as an amendment to the Conditional Commitment in accordance with § 4279.173(b) and must be reflected on Form RD 1980-19, “Guaranteed Loan Closing Report.”
( d ) The lender's promissory note must not contain provisions for default or penalty interest nor will default or penalty interest, interest on interest, or late payment fees or charges be paid under the Loan Note Guarantee.
#### In the Matter of Pamela J. Van Order, Appellant, v. Edward M. Hawley, Respondent.

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Broome County, entered April 7, 1969, which modified a prior order by increasing the amount of support payments to be made by *592respondent, for the care of his illegitimate child, from $14 per week to $25 per week. In 1962 respondent was judicially declared to be the father of the child and has been making support payments since that time. The present proceeding was brought by the appellant who now seeks an additional increase in support payments. At a hearing before the Family Court it was established that appellant has eared for the child, a girl, now six years of age, since birth. The child is mentally retarded, in need of special education, and has hearing and sight defects, requiring medical attention. Appellant is employed as a parts inspector at a factory, for which her gross salary is $3,380 annually. Respondent is the general manager of a large plant in Puerto Rico with a gross annual income of $20,000. A review of the figures submitted by both parties as to their cost of living makes clear the gross differences in their standard of living. It appears safe to conclude that respondent should have an excess of approximately $4,500 over his expenses in 1970, an amount 50% higher than the total earnings of appellant. It also appears that the child’s reasonable expenses, in view of her condition, will be far more than the $1,300 per year which the Family Court awarded. Section 545 of the Family Court Act requires that the putative father pay *“*a fair and reasonable sum ” at fixed intervals for the support of his child. Computation of the amount of support payments necessarily must bear a reasonable relation both to the financial status of the father and the needs of the child. Having given such consideration to the facts of the instant case, especially the fact that the child is mentally retarded and will require special training, the amount of the support award should be increased to $50 per week retroactive from^the date of the filing of the petition, March 25, 1969. Order modified, on the law and the facts, so as to increase the amount of the award for the support of the child to $50 per week, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to the petitioner. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.
# 

**Prepared in cooperation with theWYOMING STATE ENGINEER'S OFFICE**

# Potentiometric Surfaces, Altitudes of the Tops, and Hydrogeology of the Minnelusa and Madison Aquifers, Black Hills Area, Wyoming

**By Timothy T. Bartos, Laura L. Hallberg, and Kathy Muller Ogle2002**

**Hydrologic Investigations Atlas HA-748**

U.S. Department of the InteriorU.S. Geological Survey

| Contents- INTRODUCTION    - Previous Investigations
  - Geology
  - Acknowledgments 
- METHODS
- MINNELUSA AQUIFER    - Potentiometric Surface
  - Water Levels
  - Tritium 
- MADISON AQUIFER    - Potentiometric Surface
  - Water Levels
  - Tritium 
- POTENTIAL FOR VERTICAL FLOW          BETWEEN AQUIFERS    - References 
- MAP SHEETS

 
View looking north from spring on Sand Creek,      Black Hills Area, Wyoming. Photo by Kathy Muller Ogle.AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological SurveyPersistent URL: http://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/ha/ha748/		Page Contact Information: USGS Publishing NetworkLast modified: Wednesday, November 30 2016, 04:21:20 PM	    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
6.502 Duties and responsibilities.

(a) Agency and procuring activity advocates for competition are responsible for—

(1)Promoting the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services;

(2)Promoting full and open competition;

(3)Challenging requirements that are not stated in terms of functions to be performed, performance

required, or essential physical characteristics;

(4)Challenging barriers to the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services; and

(5)Challenging barriers to full and open competition such as unnecessarily restrictive statements of

work, unnecessarily detailed specifications, and unnecessarily burdensome contract clauses.

(b) Agency advocates for competition shall—

(1) Review the contracting operations of the agency and identify and report to the agency senior

procurement executive and the chief acquisition officer–

(i) Opportunities and actions taken to acquire commercial products and commercial services to meet

the needs of the agency;

(ii) Opportunities and actions taken to achieve full and open competition in the contracting

operations of the agency;

(iii) Actions taken to challenge requirements that are not stated in terms of functions to be

performed, performance required or essential physical characteristics;

(iv) Any condition or action that has the effect of unnecessarily restricting the acquisition of

commercial products or commercial services or unnecessarily restricting competition in the contract

actions of the agency;

(2) Prepare and submit an annual report to the agency senior procurement executive and the chief

acquisition officer in accordance with agency procedures, describing–

(i) Such advocate’s activities under this subpart;

(ii) New initiatives required to increase the acquisition of commercial products and commercial

services;

(iii) New initiatives required to increase competition;

(iv) New initiatives to ensure requirements are stated in terms of functions to be performed,

performance required or essential physical characteristics;

(v) Any barriers to the acquisition of commercial products, commercial services, or competition that

remain;

(vi) Other ways in which the agency has emphasized the acquisition of commercial products,

commercial services, and competition in areas such as acquisition training and research; and
(vii) Initiatives that ensure task and delivery orders over $1,000,000 issued under multiple award

contracts are properly planned, issued, and comply with 8.405 and 16.505.

(3) Recommend goals and plans for increasing competition on a fiscal year basis to the agency senior

procurement executive and the chief acquisition officer; and

(4) Recommend to the agency senior procurement executive and the chief acquisition officer a

system of personal and organizational accountability for competition, which may include the use of

recognition and awards to motivate program managers, contracting officers, and others in authority

to promote competition in acquisition.

Parent topic: Subpart 6.5 - Advocates for Competition
52.215-7 [Reserved]

Parent topic: 52.215 [Reserved]
Federal Acquisition Regulation

Part 42 - Contract Administration and Audit Services

Part 43 - Contract Modifications

Part 44 - Subcontracting Policies and Procedures

Part 45 - Government Property

Part 46 - Quality Assurance

Part 47 - Transportation

Part 48 - Value Engineering

Part 49 - Termination of Contracts

Part 50 - Extraordinary Contractual Actions and the safety act

Part 51 - Use of Government Sources by Contractors

Parent topic: Subchapter G - Contract Management