alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NITAR TECH CORP. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jose Gustavo
Brasil, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respect, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/S/ JOSE GUSTAVO BRASIL
-----------------------
Name: Jose Gustavo Brasil
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 26, 2007
Michael and Theresa 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 1, 2015

No. 04-15-00021-CV

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellant

v.

Michael and Theresa HAYES,

Appellees

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CV00284

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On February 24, 2015, the trial court clerk, Daniel Cedar, filed a notification of late 

record stating the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant failed to pay or make 

arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and appellant is not entitled to appeal 

without paying the fee. On February 26, 2015, this court ordered appellant to provide written 

proof to this court that either (1) the clerk’s fee had been paid or arrangements had been made to 

pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. 

On March 6, 2015, Appellant filed a notice of payment. On March 12, this Court ordered 

Daniel Cedar to file the clerk’s record by April 3, and upon no response, on April 15 ordered 

Cedar to file the clerk’s record by April 26. Cedar still has not filed the clerk’s record or 

otherwise responded to this Court’s two previous orders. 

It is therefore ORDERED the clerk’s record be filed in this court no later than May 6, 2015. If 

the record is not received by such date, an order will issue directing Daniel Cedar to appear and 

show cause why he should not be held in contempt for ignoring this Court’s order by failing to 

file the record. 

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

XAVIER U. RIGSBY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20cv515-TKW-MAF

TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION, et al.,

Defendants.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 6). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed based on 

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the case file.

Case 4:20-cv-00515-TKW-MAF Document 7 Filed 01/05/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00515-TKW-MAF Document 7 Filed 01/05/21 Page 2 of 2
# 37.115-3 Solicitation provision.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the provision at 52.237-10, Identification of *Uncompensated Overtime*, in all *solicitations* valued above the *simplified acquisition threshold*, for professional or technical services to be acquired on the basis of the number of hours to be provided.

**Parent topic:**37.115 Uncompensated overtime.
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

AARON DAVID BERLIN,

Petitioner,

v. 4:20cv354–WS/MJF

MARK S. INCH,

Respondent.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 13) docketed March 24, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as untimely. Petitioner

has filed objections (ECF No. 14) to the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation.

Upon review of the record in light of Petitioner’s objections, the court has

determined that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is due to be

adopted based on the untimeliness of Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas

Case 4:20-cv-00354-WS-MJF Document 15 Filed 04/15/21 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

corpus. Like the magistrate judge, the undersigned finds that Petitioner has failed

to establish a tenable actual-innocence gateway to overcoming the statute-oflimitations bar to consideration of his claims. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 13) is

hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order. 

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED.

3. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) challenging the

judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Aaron Berlin, Leon

County Circuit Court Case No. 2009–CF–1690, is DISMISSED with prejudice as

time barred.

4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "The petitioner's petition for writ

of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice."

5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of April , 2021.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 4:20-cv-00354-WS-MJF Document 15 Filed 04/15/21 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case 4:20-cv-00354-WS-MJF Document 15 Filed 04/15/21 Page 3 of 3
United States District Court

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Date: May 22, 2020 Case Nos.: 1:20cv67-RH & 4:20cv236-RH 

Time: 9:07 – 10:32 a.m. 

ACACIA WILLIAMS et al. v. RON DESANTIS et al.

DOCKET ENTRY: TELEPHONIC PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held. Courts 

hears argument of counsel on pending motions. Court conducts pretrial conference and addresses 

deadlines. Ruling by Court: Motions to Consolidate Cases are granted. The primary case will be 

4:20cv236. Briefs on the Motion to Intervene are due by May 27. Plaintiffs are to file a short and 

succinct position of their claims against the Defendants. The Motions for Protective Order are 

denied as moot. Bench trial remains set for July 20. All deadlines and detailed rulings will be set 

out in an order to follow.

______________________________________________________________________________

PRESENT: ROBERT L. HINKLE, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

 Cindy Markley Megan Hague

 Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

 

____________________________________________________________________________

ATTORNEYS APPEARING FOR PLAINTIFFS (1:20cv67):

Stuart Naifeh (speaker)

Kathryn Sadasivan

Kira Romero-Craft

ATTORNEYS APPEARING FOR PLAINTIFFS (4:20cv236):

John Devaney (speaker)

Christina Ford

Frederick Wermuth

ATTORNEYS APPEARING FOR DEFENDANTS:

Tara Price (speaker)

Andy Bardos (speaker)

Susan Erdelyi (speaker)

Nicholas Primrose (speaker)

Ronald Labasky (speaker)

Case 4:20-cv-00236-RH-MJF Document 60 Filed 05/22/20 Page 1 of 2
Elizabeth Teegen (speaker)

Robert Swain (speaker)

Frank Mari (speaker)

Jeffrey DeSousa (speaker)

Kia Johnson (speaker)

Brooke Gaffney (speaker)

Bradley McVay

George Meros

Edward Wenger

Gary Perko

Mohammad Jazil

Robert Shillinger

Dale Scott

Elizabeth Ellis

Gregory Stewart

John Lavia

Nicholas Shannin

Jon Jouben

Francis Carroll

ATTORNEYS APPEARING FOR INTERVENOR:

Jason Torchinsky (speaker)

Benjamin Gibson

Case 4:20-cv-00236-RH-MJF Document 60 Filed 05/22/20 Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00043

- CV

JLG TRUCKING LLC

, Appellant

v.

Lauren R. GARZA

, Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7459

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee, Lauren R. Garza, recover her costs of this appeal

from appellant, JLG Trucking, LLC.

SIGNED October 9 , 2013.

_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
#### § 58.24 Record of filing time.

A record showing the date and hour when each such application for appeal inspection or grading is received shall be maintained in such manner as the Administrator may prescribe.
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.40 How to read this part 4290. ( a ) *Center Headings.* Center headings are descriptive and are used for convenience only. They have no regulatory effect.
( b ) *Capitalizing defined terms.* Terms defined in § 4290.50 have initial capitalization in this part 4290.
( c ) *“You.”* The pronoun “you” as used in this part 4290 means a RBIC unless otherwise noted.
( d ) *Forms.* All references in this part to forms, and instructions for their preparation, are to the current issue of such forms.
§ 4287.323 Subordination of lien position. A Subordination of the Lender's lien position must be requested in writing by the Lender and concurred with in writing by the Agency in advance of the Subordination. The Lender's Subordination proposal must include a financial analysis of the servicing action and be fully supported by current financial statements of the Borrower and guarantors that are less than 90 days old. ( a ) The Subordination of the Lender's lien position must enhance the Borrower's business and be in the best financial interest of the Agency.
( b ) The lien to which the guaranteed loan is subordinated is for a fixed dollar limit and for a fixed term after which the guaranteed loan lien priority will be restored. Notwithstanding, a Subordination of lien position on inventory and accounts receivable may be made to a line of credit.
( c ) Collateral must remain sufficient to provide for adequate Collateral coverage. The Agency may require a current independent appraisal in accordance with § 4279.244 of this chapter.
( d ) Lien priorities must remain for the portion of the loan Collateral that was not subordinated.
( e ) Subordination of the Lender's lien position must be for Good Cause.
#### § 51.697 Well formed.

*Well formed* means that the fruit has the shape characteristic of the variety.
#### The State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Appellant, *v.*Bilbao et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao,*109 Ohio St.3d 81, 2006-Ohio-1928.]

(No. 2005-1322

Submitted March 14, 2006

Decided May 3, 2006.)

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

*82Eastman & Smith, Ltd., Thomas A. Dixon, and Richard L. Johnson, for appellant.

Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneau.lt *&*Schaffer Co., L.P.A., and Theodore A. Bowman, for appellee Amparo Bilbao.

Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Andrew J. Alatis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Davon Knight, Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 431]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Thomas Farber, J.) rendered May 17, 2004, as amended May 27, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree (eight counts), criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (two counts), grand larceny in the fourth degree (five counts), offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree and making a punishable false written statement, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 18 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of remanding for resentencing on the convictions other than robbery, and otherwise affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s challenge for cause to a prospective juror, since the totality of her responses established that she would be fair and impartial *(see People v Arnold,*96 NY2d 358, 362 [2001]). The panelist made a response to questioning by defense counsel which, when viewed in context, was only an indication that she believed that, in order for there to be a prosecution, there must be some evidence linking a defendant to the crime. Even if her response could be interpreted as expressing a belief that an arrest or indictment is some indication of guilt, the panelist was completely rehabilitated when she gave the court her unequivocal assurance that she would follow its instructions that a defendant is presumed innocent and that an arrest is no evidence of guilt.

As the Eeople concede, when the court resentenced defendant in order to correct a mistake as to the convictions other than robbery, it improperly did so in defendant’s absence.

Defendant’s remaining contentions, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief, are unpreserved and we decline *307to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Nardelli, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
31.000 Scope of part.

This part contains cost principles and procedures for-

(a) The pricing of contracts, subcontracts, and modifications to contracts and subcontracts whenever

cost analysis is performed (see 15.404-1(c)); and

(b) The determination, negotiation, or allowance of costs when required by a contract clause.

Parent topic: Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
#### § 51.1999 Well formed.

*Well formed* means that the filbert shell is not materially misshapen.
§ 51.1150 U.S. No. 3. “U.S. No. 3” consists of oranges which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Mature;
( 2 ) Misshapen;
( 3 ) Poorly colored;
( 4 ) Rough texture, not seriously lumpy;
( 5 ) Similar varietal characteristics; and
( 6 ) Slightly spongy.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Decay;
( 2 ) Unhealed skin breaks; and
( 3 ) Wormy fruit.
( c ) Free from very serious damage caused by: ( 1 ) Ammoniation;
( 2 ) Bruises;
( 3 ) Buckskin;
( 4 ) Caked melanose;
( 5 ) Creasing;
( 6 ) Disease;
( 7 ) Dryness or mushy condition;
( 8 ) Hail;
( 9 ) Insects;
( 10 ) Riciness or woodiness;
( 11 ) Scab;
( 12 ) Scale;
( 13 ) Scars;
( 14 ) Skin breakdown;
( 15 ) Split navels;
( 16 ) Sprayburn;
( 17 ) Sunburn; and
( 18 ) Other means.
( d ) For tolerances see § 51.1151.
( e ) Internal quality: Lots meeting the internal requirements for “U.S. Grade AA Juice (Double A)” or “U.S. Grade A Juice” may be so specified in connection with the grade. (See §§ 51.1176-51.1179.)
# L_2013298EN.01002101.xml

| 8.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 298/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 298/21

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1109/2013

of 5 November 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Melone Mantovano (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Melone Mantovano’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Melone Mantovano’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EC) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EC) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 November 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 132, 9.5.2013, p. 17.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

ITALY

Melone Mantovano (PGI)

---
February 28, 2007

Ms. Kristen Driscoll
Citibank, N.A.
388 Greenwich Street 14th Floor
New York, NY 10013

RE: Officer's Certificate - Annual Statement as to Compliance

PHH Mortgage Capital LLC, Series:  PHHMC 2006-3

Dear Ms. Driscoll:

The undersigned officer certifies the following for PHH Mortgage Corporation
(the "Master Servicer") for the 2006 calendar year.

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2006, among PHH Mortgage Capital LLC, PHH
Mortgage Corporation and Citibank, N.A. (the "Pooling and Servicing
Agreement") has been made under my supervision.

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement in all material respects throughout such year, except as noted in
(iii) below.

(iii) During the months of July, August, and September, 2006 the Master
Servicer's minimum coverage requirement on its fidelity bond exceeded its
$160 million bond by amounts ranging up to approximately $1.3 million.
Effective September 27, 2006, the Master Servicer's fidelity bond was
increased to $170 million.



Certified by:

/s/ Marc J. Hinkle
--------------------------------
Officer-Marc J. Hinkle
Vice President-Loan Servicing
PHH Mortgage Corporation
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1812 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 294 ) IV-C- 7 Docket Number: 

# A-efr-a *

Printed 11/3/2008 10:13:06

AM Sheet 294 of 307P. 2 UNITE DSTATES ENVIRONMENTA

L PROTECTIO

N AGENC Y'_ e^-o^ 

## rr-cz-o-^

Honorabl e Barbar a A . Mikulsk i Unite d State s Senat e Washington , D . C . 20510-200 3 Dea r Ms . Mikulski : Thi s lette r i s respons e t o you r lette r o f February16 , 199 0 t o WilliamReilly , regarding th e finalizatio n o f on-highway diese l fue l regulations . I n th e letter , yo u urge d EPAt o conside r completio n o f thi s rulemaking withou t an yexemption s fo r smal l refiners . Yo u wer e correc t t o not e tha t w e hav e bee n requeste d t o provid e a

n interi mexemptio n fo r smal l refiners . A s I a msur e yo u ar e aware , w e ar e require d t o full yconside r th e merit s o f al l suc hrequest s raise d during th e commen t period . Thi s i s especiall ytru e whe n dealing wit hissue s ar e seriou s a s the potentia l fo r regiona l fue l shortage s a s a resul t o f our action . Thu s w e mus t mak e our decisio n onl yafte r th e merit s o f bot hside s o f th e issu e ar e considered . I shoul d als o ad d tha t w e hav e receive d man ycomment s fro

mmarketer s regarding th e possibilit yo f a smal l refine r exemptio n an d th e handling o f multipl e fue l grades . I assur e yo u tha t w e wil l conside r al l o f thes e comment s veryseriousl yi n making our decisio n a s t o whethe r a smal l refine r exemptio n i s justified . Thank yo u fo r sharing you r thought s wit hus . Sincerel yyours , •z'-'Z- :.'...'-,';."; 3 Y

. . " • -.;:;••:• • ".C.'.'-A Ac.~y\ • .r .. .-.. ' aj. .'

i.-.CtJiH Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s
###### Editorial Note on Part 57

#### Editorial Note:

1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

#### § 57.965 Returned U.S. inspected and marked products; not importations.

Products that have been inspected by the Department and so marked, and which are returned from foreign countries are not importations within the meaning of this part. Such returned shipments shall be reported to the Administrator by letter.

[63 FR 69968, 69971, Dec. 17, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 57168, Sept. 24, 2004]
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:97cr24LAC

GUS JONES

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on MAY 13, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Sealed Document in Support 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 5/8/2008 Doc.# 111 & 112

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 1st day of

July, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Pursuant to the guideline amendments, a defendant who is held responsible for

over 4.5 kilos of cocaine base does not receive relief from Amendment 706 and

711. The defendant is responsible for the distribution of 5 to 10 kilograms of

cocaine base, which is over the 4.5 kilograms of cocaine base to trigger the

amendment. In addition, defendant was and would still today be facing a

mandatory life sentence. Defendant was sentenced to 180 months, a sentence well

below the mandatory life sentence, as a result of a 5K1.1 motion and a Rule 35

motion filed by the Government. Based upon the facts and circumstances of this

case, 180 months is still the appropriate sentence. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:97-cr-00024-LC-MD Document 113 Filed 07/01/08 Page 1 of 1