alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OU 7

OU 6

OU 4

OU

2

OU 8

OU 9

OU 5

OU 2

OU

3

OU 10

OU 1

OU 9

OU 3

OU 8

OU 8

OU 8

OU 9

OU 11

OU 3

OU 5

OU

5

OU

3

OU 6

OU

5

OU 9

OU 9

OU 9 OU 5

Arkansas River

East Fork Arkansas River

Arkansas River

California Gulch

Little Evans Gulch

Evans Gulch

Iowa Gulch

Iowa Gulch

Empire Gulch

Turquoise Lake

Lake

Fork

Lake Fork

Evans Gulch

Tennessee

Creek

Iowa Gulch

Whites Gulch

Oregon Gulch

Willow Creek

Pigtail

Gulch

Thompson Gulch

Lake Fork

Evans Gulch

Alps Gulch

South Evans Gulch

Johnson Gulch

California Gulch

Little Evans Gulch

Pawnee Gulch

Georgia Gulch

£¤24

£¤24 24

£¤24

£¤91

4th

17th

County

Road45

CountyRoad5A

Adler

Chucker

County

Road3

CountyRoad2

5th

Poplar

10th

Poplar

County

Road3C

CountyRoad17

Gold Gold

County

Road1

2nd

W ni ter

Roaring

McWethy

Paint

Brush

Highway300

Mount

Elbert

MountMassive

CountyRoad4

Maple

CountyRoad23

Fryer

CountyRoad6A

Orange

CountyRoad1

12th

Alder

Empire

Valley

Hazel

Hemlock

CountyRoad36

Spruce

Leiter

Pine

County

Road3

Harrison

Spring

7th

County

Route3B

R

C

o

ounty

ad1A

3rd

Deer

MountainView

CountyRoute2

Toledo

Elm

CountyRoad99

Dexter

Diamond

CountyRoad1D

3rd

11th

12th Slater

6th

8th

7th

CountyRoad4

Ruby

County

Road99

Rock

2nd County

Road1 4th

County

Road3BA Ash

Highway300

GemValley

CountyRoad3

Mountain

View

CountyRoad44

CMC

6th

8

7th

th

15th

Elm

13th

4th

5th

9th

Chestnut

Empire

Valley

County

Route1A

CountyRoute3B

Antelope

Elk

County

Road2

CountyRoad36

Garnet

County

Road46

County

Road11

Agate

Gabbro

Sawatch

R

C

o

ounty

ad3B

Front

County

Road9e

Topaz

Autumn CountyRoad31

CountyRoad1C Empire

Valley

Dore

County

Road48

County

Road4A

Monroe

Beaver

Turquoise

R

County

oad1

Tabor

Mount

Traver

BabyDoe

County

Road45

County

Route6C

Rafferty

CountyRoad3

Chukar

Empire

Hummer

Crescent

Ridgeview

Valley

CountyRoad5

County

Road6A

County

Road3A

Augusta

BabyDoe

CountyRoute1B

County

Road9

Evergreen

County

Road6

CountyRoad2B

CountyRoute38

CountyRoad9D

MountainView

CountyRoad5

CountyRoad6D

CountyRoad36A

Halfmoon

California Gulch Superfund Site

£

Date: October 26, 2010

Data Sources: Streets -

GDT (2006). Rivers & Streams -

CDOW (2004). Lakes & Ponds -

NHD Plus (2005). NPL & OU

Boundaries - U.S. EPA Region

8 (2010).

Map Projection: UTM, Meters,

Zone 13 N, NAD 83

NPL Boundary

Lake

Intermittent Stream

Perennial Stream or Ditch

River

Local Street

US or State Highway

OU 1

OU 10

OU 11

OU 2

OU 3

OU 4

OU 5

OU 6

OU 7

OU 9

Deleted OU

Lake County, Colorado

OU 9 Partial Deletion

Residential Areas

OU 8

OU 9 (Intended

for Deletion)

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Miles

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Kilometers
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-20940 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ALFREDO LERMA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CR-87-1 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alfredo Lerma has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lerma has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 22, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2536 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Acetylbutyrolactone. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Acetylbutyrolactone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-ACETYLBUTYROLACTONE. 

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting 

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.65 2-Acetylbutyrolactone (CAS 

No. 517–23–7) (provided for 

in subheading 2932.29.50) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 2536 IS 

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2331 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the period for 

which the designation of an area as an empowerment zone is in effect. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2006 

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the period for which the designation of an area as an 

empowerment zone is in effect. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ROUND II AND ROUND III EM4 POWERMENT ZONES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 

6 1391(d)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re7 lating to period for which designation is in effect) is 

8 amended by inserting ‘‘(December 31, 2016, in the case 

9 of any empowerment zone designated under subsection (g) 

10 or (h))’’ after ‘‘2009’’. 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 2331 IS

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (2) of 

2 section 1391(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re3 lating to additional designations permitted) is amended by 

4 striking ‘‘2009’’ and inserting ‘‘2016’’. 

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall apply after the date of the enactment 

7 of this Act. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Case No. 3:20cr61/MCR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 3:20cr61/MCR

ISHMEAL S. HODGES 

 /

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 

12, 2021. ECF No. 61. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 

61, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

Case 3:20-cr-00061-MCR Document 62 Filed 09/10/21 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 3:20cr61/MCR

2. Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, ECF No. 53, is DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of September 2021.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00061-MCR Document 62 Filed 09/10/21 Page 2 of 2
Case No.: 3:20cv5776/LAC/EMT

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BENJAMIN HINSON WARD,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5776/LAC/EMT

OKALOOSA COUNTY COURT 

SYSTEM, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on April 26, 

2021 (ECF No. 17). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

17) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a 

claim upon which relief can be granted.

Case 3:20-cv-05776-LC-EMT Document 18 Filed 06/09/21 Page 1 of 2
Case No.: 3:20cv5776/LAC/EMT

Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of June 2021.

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier 

Case 3:20-cv-05776-LC-EMT Document 18 Filed 06/09/21 Page 2 of 2
36.602-3 Evaluation board functions.       Under the general direction of the head of the contracting activity, an evaluation board shall perform the following functions:                                       (a) 						            Review the current data files on eligible firms and responses to a public notice concerning the particular project (see 36.603).                                          (b) 						            Evaluate the firms in accordance with the criteria in 36.602-1.                                          (c) 						            Hold discussions with at least three of the most highly qualified firms regarding concepts and the relative utility of alternative methods of furnishing the required services.                                          (d) 						            Prepare a selection report for the agency head or other designated selection authority recommending, in order of preference, at least three firms that are considered to be the most highly qualified to perform the required services. The report shall include a description of the discussions and evaluation conducted by the board to allow the selection authority to review the considerations upon which the recommendations are based.    **Parent topic:** 36.602 Selection of firms for architect-engineer contracts.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Fresno County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fresno County Resource Advisory Committee will be meeting 
in Prather, California, January 12, 2011 and in Clovis, California, 
January 26, 2011. The purpose of the January 12 meeting will be to 
review new project proposals that were submitted by the January 7, 2011 
deadline. The purpose of the meeting on January 26 will be to vote and 
approve projects to be funded under the Secure Rural Schools and 
Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 110-343).

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 12, 2011 from 6 p.m. to 8:30 
p.m. in Prather, CA and January 26, 2011 from 6 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. in 
Clovis, CA.

ADDRESSES: The meeting on January 12th will be held at the High Sierra 
Ranger District, 29688 Auberry Rd. Prather, CA. The meeting on January 
26th will be held at the Sierra National Forest Supervisor's Office, 
1600 Tollhouse Rd. Clovis, CA. Send written comments to Darcy Brown, 
Fresno County Resource Advisory Committee Coordinator, do Sierra 
National Forest, High Sierra Ranger District, 29688 Auberry Road, 
Prather, CA 93651 or electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b4f474959445c451b196b4d58054d4e4f055e58"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="41252d23332e362f71730127326f2724256f3432">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darcy Brown, Fresno County Resource 
Advisory Committee Coordinator, (559) 855-5355 ext. 3374.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who wish to bring Payments to States Fresno County 
Title II project matters to the attention of the Committee may file 
written statements with the Committee staff before or after the 
meeting. Final project submissions are due by January 7, 2011 to the 
Forest Service. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Review project 
proposals and (2) Vote on projects to be funded.

    Dated: November 8, 2010.
Ray Porter,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 2010-28799 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**RVAA C**  **Sub -**  **committee on Rooms and Spaces**  **- Meeting #** **2 Conference Call**  **– June 19**  **, 2014 (1 to 3 pm ET)** 

Agenda 1. Introductions
– Jim Pecht/Rose 2. Categorize elements in the various rooms and spaces requiring access – Dennis Cannon 2.1 Sleeper Car Compartments 2.2 Toilet and Bathing Rooms 3. Discuss possible scoping requirements for identified elements
– Dennis Cannon 4. Sub - committee Homework
– Dennis Cannon 5. D ate of next conference call : July 17 th , 1 - 3 pm 6. Closing remarks Attachments
§ 51.1430 U.S. Extra Fancy. “U.S. Extra Fancy” consists of pecan kernels which meet the following requirements: ( a ) For quality: ( 1 ) Well dried;
( 2 ) Moisture content shall not be more than 4.5 percent, unless otherwise specified;
( 3 ) Well developed;
( 4 ) Uniform in color;
( 5 ) Not darker than “light;”
( 6 ) Free from damage by any cause; and
( 7 ) Comply with tolerances for defects (see § 51.1437).
( b ) For size: ( 1 ) Uniform in size; and
( 2 ) Conform to size classification or count specified.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
William Richter, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Isilon Systems, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Isilon Systems, Inc.





Dated:
      February 18, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      WILLIAM RICHTERName:
            William
      RichterTitle:
            Vice
      President of Finance and Interim Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)
28.106-3 Additional bond and security.

(a) When additional bond coverage is required and is secured in whole or in part by the original

surety or sureties, agencies shall use Standard Form1415, Consent of Surety and Increase of

Penalty. Standard Form1415 is authorized for local reproduction.

(b) When additional bond coverage is required and is secured in whole or in part by a new surety or

by one of the alternatives described in 28.204 in lieu of corporate or individual surety, agencies shall

use Standard Form25, Performance Bond; Standard Form1418, Performance Bond for Other Than

Construction Contracts; Standard Form25A, Payment Bond; or Standard Form1416, Payment Bond

for Other Than Construction Contracts.

Parent topic: 28.106 Administration.
Second Department,

December, 1966

(December 5, 1966)

#### In the Matter of the Application of Alexander M. Emerman for Admission to the Bar.

'The applicant for admission to the Bar passed the Bar examination in May, 1931, and was certified by the State Board of Law Examiners in June, 1931. Thereafter, from 1934 to 1936, he attended graduate law school. He obtained a set of application forms in 1940 but did not file it. He obtained a second set of forms in August, 1965 and filed it in December, 1965. During the intervening 34 years between the date of his certification by the State Board of Law Examiners and the filing of his admission papers, with the exception of his graduate study which terminated in 1936, the applicant was not connected in any way with the field of law. He had been employed or engaged in the profession of engineering. In view of the inordinate delay which is present in this particular case and the applicant’s complete detachment from the legal field during a period in excess of 30 years, particularly when considered against the background of the great and far-reaching changes which the law has undergone during such period, both substantively and procedurally in the civil and criminal fields, we are constrained to conclude that the applicant does not presently possess the requisite fitness for admission to the Bar. Accordingly, the application is denied. However, if the applicant be so advised, he may apply to the State Board of Law Examiners for permission to take the Bar examination again. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan, Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION 

RHONDA FLEMING, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 

Civil Case Number: 

4:20-CV-00545-WS-MJF 

 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1) and 4(a), Defendant Warden Erica 

Strong hereby gives notice that she intends to appeal to the United States Court 

of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from the Order of the United States District 

Court for the Northern District of Florida entered on November 21, 2022, denying 

her motion to dismiss based on the availability of a cause of action and on qualified 

immunity. [ECF No. 159]. 

 
Respectfully submitted, 

 JASON R. COODY 

 United States Attorney 

 

 /s/ Marie A. Moyle 

MARIE A. MOYLE 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Florida Bar No. 1003498 

Email: marie.moyle@usdoj.gov 

111 North Adams Street, 4th Floor 

Tallahassee, FL 32301 

Telephone: 85-942-8430 

Fax: 850-942-8466 

 Counsel for United States of America 

LOCAL RULE 5.1(F) CERTIFICATION 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been furnished via email (as requested), this 19th day of January, 2023; and via certified first-class mail 

on January 20, 2023 to: 

RHONDA FLEMING 

20446-009 

FCI DUBLIN 

5701 8TH STREET 

DUBLIN, CA 94568 

 

/s/ Marie A. Moyle 

 Marie A. Moyle 

 Assistant United States Attorney 

Counsel for United States of America
#### Home Mutual Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v Thomas G. Presutti, Defendant, Travelers Insurance Company, Respondent, and Rose Osipovitch et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Appeal unanimously dismissed as academic in view of the determination in *Home Mut. Ins. Co. v Presutti*(78 AD2d 968). (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court — summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
**Fromex
        Equity Corp.**
 **Notes
        To Financial Statements**


**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





Certification
      of CEO and CFO





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Fromex Equity Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K for the Period ended February 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Murray Stahl, Chief
      Executive Officer, and Steven Bregman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to Section 18 U. S. C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1937;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company





May
                29, 2007By:
            /s/
              MURRAY STAHLMurray Stahl
              *Chairman of the Board and**Chief
                Executive Officer* May
                29, 2007By:
            /s/
              STEVEN BREGMANSteven
              Bregman*President
              and
              Chief Financial Officer*





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic, version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange commission or its staff
      upon request.





This
      certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
      by
      such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposed of Section 18 of the
      securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such
      certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to
      the
      extent that the Company specifically incorporated it by reference.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JACOB B. ALLEN,

FDOC Inmate No. E47496,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5784-MCR-EMT

MARK INCH, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on March

10, 2021. ECF No. 22. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5784-MCR-EMT

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 

22, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1);

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of June 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE