alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TRUSTEES OF VILLAGE OF BATH v. McBRIDE et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 7, 1914.)

Appeal from Trial Term, Steuben County.

Action by the Trustees of the Village of Bath against Daniel J. McBride and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

Reversed, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Argued before KRUSE, P. J., and ROBSON, FOOTE, LAMBERT, and MERRELL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed, and complaint dismissed, with costs, including costs of this appeal, upon the opinion of LAMBERT, J., in the case of Trustees of Village of Bath v. Daniel J. McBride et al., as executors, etc. (148 N. Y. Supp. 836), décided herewith, and certain findings of fact disapproved and other findings in lieu thereof made by this court. All concur.
#### § 51.2713 Application of tolerances.

The tolerances provided in these standards are on a lot basis and shall be applied to a composite sample representative of the lot. However, any container or group of containers in which the peanuts are obviously of a quality materially different from that in the majority of containers shall be considered a separate lot, and shall be sampled separately.
§ 51.2106 U.S. Extra No. 1. “U.S. Extra No. 1” consists of shelled almonds of similar varietal characteristics which are whole, clean and well dried, and which are free from decay, rancidity, insect injury, foreign material, doubles, split or broken kernels, particles and dust, and free from damage caused by chipped and scratched kernels, mold, gum, shriveling, brown spot or other means. (See §§ 51.2113 and 51.2114.) In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, the following tolerances, by weight, shall be permitted: ( a ) *For dissimilar varieties.* 5 percent, including not more than one-fifth of this amount, or 1 percent, for bitter almonds mixed with sweet almonds;
( b ) *For doubles.* 5 percent;
( c ) *For kernels damaged by chipping and/or scratching.* 5 percent;
( d ) *For foreign material.* One-twentieth of 1 percent (0.05 percent). No part of this percentage shall be allowed for glass and metal;
( e ) *For particles and dust.* One-tenth of 1 percent (0.10 percent); and,
( f ) *For other defects.* 4 percent, including not more than one-fourth of this amount, or 1 percent, for split or broken kernels, and including not more than three-eighths of the former amount, or 11 ⁄ 2 percent, for seriously damaged kernels.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SkyTerra Communications,
Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott Macleod, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Scott Macleod                                                 
|Scott Macleod Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 9, 2007
# 13.303 Blanket purchase agreements (BPAs).

- 13.303-1 General. 
- 13.303-2 Establishment of BPAs. 
- 13.303-3 Preparation of BPAs. 
- 13.303-4 Clauses. 
- 13.303-5 Purchases under BPAs. 
- 13.303-6 Review procedures. 
- 13.303-7 Completion of BPAs. 
- 13.303-8 Optional clause. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 13.3 - Simplified Acquisition Methods
#### Dominic S. Rinaldi, v Viking Penguin, Inc. et al.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, granted and insofar as it seeks continuation of a stay of plaintiffs discovery, the motion is granted subject to modification by the Court of Appeals. [101 Misc 2d 928.] Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Lupiano, Silverman and Bloom, JJ.
ex10-1.htm


    
      
        

      

    

    Exhibit
10.1

     

    
      Joinder
Agreement

      


       

      The
undersigned hereby agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of the
Employment Security Plan of Internap Network Services, Inc., dated as of
November 14, 2007, as if he or she initially had executed such Plan as a party
thereto, and, without by implication limiting the foregoing, agrees to each
acknowledgment, covenant and other agreement contained therein.

       

      
        
          
            
              
                
                  
                    	 	 	 	 
	
                            Date

                          	
                            By:
      

                          	/s/ Randal
      R. Thompson	 
	 	 	Employee	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	December
      23, 2007	 
	 	 	Date	 
	 	 	 	 


                  

                

              

            

          

        



      Accepted:

      INTERNAP
NETWORK SERVICES, INC.

       

      
        
          
            
              
                
                  
                    
                      
                        
                          
                            
                              	 	 	 
	
                                      By:
      

                                    	/s/ Richard
      P. Dobb	 
	Its:	Secretary	 
	Date:	December
      23, 2007
41.103 Statutory and delegated authority.       (a) 						            Statutory authority.                                                         (1) 								                The General Services Administration (GSA) is authorized by 40 U.S.C. 501 to prescribe policies and methods governing the acquisition and supply of utility services for Federal agencies. This authority includes related functions such as managing public utility services and representing Federal agencies in proceedings before Federal and state regulatory bodies. GSA is authorized by 40 U.S.C.501 to contract for utility services for periods not exceeding tenyears.                                                            (2) The Department of Defense (DoD) is authorized by                             10 U.S.C. 3201(a)                                                      and 40 U.S.C.113(e)(3) to acquire utility services for military facilities.                                                            (3) 								                The Department of Energy (DOE) is authorized by the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C.7251, *etseq*.) to acquire utility services. DOE is authorized by the Atomic Energy Act of1954, as amended (42 U.S.C.2204), to enter into new contracts or modify existing contracts for electric services for periods not exceeding 25 years for uranium enrichment installations.                                                                             (b)                   *Delegated authority*. GSA has delegated its authority to enter into utility service contracts for periods not exceeding tenyears to DoD and DOE, and for connection charges only to the Department of Veteran Affairs. Contracting pursuant to this delegated authority shall be consistent with the requirements of this part. Other agencies requiring utility service contracts for periods over oneyear, but not exceeding tenyears, may request a delegation of authority from GSA at the address specified in 41.301(a). In keeping with its statutory authority, GSA will, as necessary, conduct reviews of delegated agencies’ acquisitions of utility services to ensure compliance with the terms of the delegation and applicable laws and regulations.                                          (c) 						            Requests for delegations of contracting authority from GSA shall include a certification from the acquiring agency’s Senior Procurement Executive that the agency has-                                                         (1) 								                An established acquisition program;                                                            (2) 								                Personnel technically qualified to deal with specialized utilities problems; and                                                            (3) 								                The ability to accomplish its own pre-award contract review.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 41.1 - General
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 3:20-cr-59-MCR

FRANK LEON STAPLETON

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. 

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts One, Two, Three, and Four 

of the indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath 

concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined the guilty plea 

was knowing and voluntary and the offense charged is supported by an independent 

basis in fact containing each of the essential elements thereof. I therefore 

recommend the plea of guilty be accepted and the Defendant be adjudicated guilty 

and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: January 21, 2021.

/s/ Hope Thai Cannon HOPE THAI CANNON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00059-MCR Document 23 Filed 01/21/21 Page 1 of 2
3:20-cr-59-MCR

Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed 

within twenty-four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different 

deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use 

only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the 

magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a magistrate 

judge's findings or recommendations contained in a report and 

recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 

waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on 

unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir. Rule 

3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Case 3:20-cr-00059-MCR Document 23 Filed 01/21/21 Page 2 of 2
§ 51.2293 Serious damage. *Serious damage* means any defect, other than color, which seriously affects the appearance, or the edible or shipping quality of the individual portion of kernel or of the lot as a whole. Any one of the following defects or any combination of defects the seriousness of which exceeds the maximum allowed for any one defect shall be considered as serious damage: ( a ) Shriveling when more than one-fourth of the kernel is severely shriveled, or a greater area is affected by lesser degrees of shriveling producing an equally objectionable appearance;
( b ) Mold when plainly visible on more than one-eighth of the surface of the kernel in the aggregate; and,
( c ) Discoloration of the meat when more than one-fourth the volume of the portion of kernel is severely discolored, or a greater volume is affected by lesser degrees of discoloration producing an equally objectionable appearance.
Exhibit 32

     CERTIFICATIONS OF PATRICK A. CUSTER, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
       PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VPGI Corp.
 (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
 Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, the
 undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S1350,
 as adopted pursuant to S906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
 best of my knowledge:

      1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.


 Date:  February 21, 2006      /s/    PATRICK A. CUSTER
                               -------------------------------
                               Patrick A. Custer
                               Chief Executive Officer
                               and Principal Financial Officer


 The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form
 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as
 part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any
 filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
 regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### § 51.1263 U.S. No. 2.

“U.S. No. 2” consists of pears of one variety which are mature, but not over-ripe, carefully hand-picked, clean, not seriously misshapen, free from decay, internal breakdown, scald, freezing injury, worm holes, black end, and from damage caused by hard end, or broken skins. The pears shall also be free from serious damage caused by bruises, russeting, limbrubs, hail, scars, drought spot, sunburn, sprayburn, stings or other insect injury, disease, or mechanical or other means. (See §§ 51.1265 and 51.1268.)
#### §§ 4279.175-4279.179 [Reserved]
#### § 51.2716 Split.

*Split* means the separated half of a peanut kernel.
(May 22, 1969)

#### Maria A. Santalla, Respondent, v. Eusebio Santalla, Appellant.

Order entered February 19, 1969, awarding temporary alimony in the sum of $125 per week, commencing from November 25, 1968, together with counsel fees in the sum of $1,000, unanimously modified on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reducing alimony to the sum of $80 per week, commencing December 20, 1968, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Since the parties were married on September 6, 1946, and thus the marriage did have stability, the plaintiff wife seems to have reasonable grounds, prima facie, and subject to proof, warranting temporary alimony. However, she has demonstrated earning capacity and it is also reasonable to assume this will continue, in the absence of illness or accident. The *pendente lite*allowance of $80 per week seems to us to more accord with the realities, considering the husband’s effort to support also the couple’s teen-age daughter, still in school; the allowance is of course, subject to re-examination and revision at the plenary trial. And further, in view of the fact, plaintiff was concededly gainfully employed at a salary of $8,000 per year until December 20, 1968, the husband should not be held responsible for her complete support prior to that date. Concur— Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tilzer, McGivern and Steuer, JJ.
§ 52.1003 Grades of dates. ( a ) U.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy is the quality of whole or pitted dates that are of one variety, that possess a good color, that are practically uniform in size, that are practically free from defects, that possess a good character, and that score not less than 90 points when scored in accordance with the scoring system outlined in this subpart.
( b ) U.S. Grade B or U.S. Choice is the quality of whole or pitted dates other than whole dry dates for processing that are of one variety, that possess a reasonably good color, that are reasonably uniform in size, that are reasonably free from defects, that possess a reasonably good character, and that score not less than 80 points when scored in accordance with the scoring system outlined in this subpart.
( c ) U.S. Grade B (Dry) or U.S. Choice (Dry) is the quality of whole dry dates for processing that are of one variety, that possess a reasonably good color, that are reasonably uniform in size, that are reasonably free from defects, that possess a reasonably good character, and that score not less than 80 points when scored in accordance with the scoring system outlined in this subpart.
( d ) U.S. Grade C or U.S. Stand- ard is the quality of whole or pitted dates other than whole dry dates for processing that are of one variety or of date pieces or macerated dates that possess a fairly good color, that are fairly uniform in size except for date pieces or macerated dates, that are fairly free from defects, that possess a fairly good character, and that score not less than 70 points when scored in accordance with the scoring system outlined in this subpart.
( e ) U.S. Grade C (Dry) or U.S. Standard (Dry) is the quality of whole dry dates for processing that are of one variety, that possess a fairly good color, that are fairly uniform in size, that are fairly free from defects, that possess a fairly good character, and that score not less than 70 points when scored in accordance with the scoring system outlined in this subpart.
( f ) *Substandard* is the quality of dates that fail to meet the requirements of U.S. Grade C or U.S. Stand- ard or U.S. Grade C (Dry) or U.S. Standard (Dry), whichever is applicable.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 31, 1999 for May Limited Partnership 1984-1 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000757525
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1984-1
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         126
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  37
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         61
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   224
<SALES>                                        47
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               48
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                28
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            28
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   28
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jerry C. Atkin, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of SkyWest, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periods presented in this report.

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 22, 2010

/s/ JERRY C. ATKIN Jerry C. Atkin Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### New York Business Development Corporation, Respondent, v. Gilbert’s Hotel, Inc., et al., Defendants, and A. Gordon & Sons, Inc., et al., Appellants.

'Motion for a stay granted, on condition appellants shall, on or before February 15, 1967, deposit with the County Clerk $500, or furnish a surety bond in the same amount, as security for damages which may be caused as a result of the stay herein; and on the further condition that appellants make application to settle the record on appeal pursuant to subdivision e of rule 2 of this court's rules within five days after entry of the order herein. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
22.403 Statutory, Executive Order, and

regulatory requirements.

22.403-1 Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute.

22.403-2 Copeland Act.

22.403-3 Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards.

22.403-4 Executive Orders 13658 and 14026.

22.403-5 Executive Order 13706.

22.403-6 Department of Labor regulations involving construction.

Parent topic: Subpart 22.4 - Labor Standards for Contracts Involving Construction
Third Department,

December, 1979

(December 4, 1979)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bernard Pratt, Jr., Appellant.

Application to dismiss appeal by reason of defendant’s death granted and matter remanded to the trial court to vacate the conviction and dismiss the indictment, *sua sponte,*or on application by the District Attorney or the attorney who appeared for defendant. (See *People v Mintz,*20 NY2d 770). Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Staley, Jr., Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Family LiteracyFamily ProgramsLiteracy EducationParent EducationParent ParticipationPartnerships in EducationPreschool EducationProgram EffectivenessProgram Evaluation

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### § 51.1162 Fairly smooth texture.

*Fairly smooth texture* means that the skin is fairly thin and not coarse for the variety and size of the fruit.