alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>
                                                            Exhibit 31.2

Certification required by Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael G. Koppel, Vice President and Treasurer of Nordstrom Credit, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nordstrom Credit,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: December 8, 2003                   /s/ Michael G. Koppel
      -------------------                 -----------------------------
                                          Michael G. Koppel
                                          Vice President and Treasurer
36.609-4 Requirements for registration of

designers.

Insert the clause at 52.236-25, Requirements for Registration of Designers, in architect-engineer

contracts, except that it may be omitted when the design will be performed-

(a) Outside the United States and its outlying areas; or

(b) In a State or outlying area of the United States that does not have registration requirements for

the particular field involved.

Parent topic: 36.609 Contract clauses.
|Table of Contents      | Acknowledgments        | About the Council
|---------------------- | ---------------------- | -----------------
|Subject Index of Cases | Case Law Report Search
§ 51.310 Packing requirements. ( a ) Apples tray packed or cell packed in cartons shall be arranged according to approved and recognized methods. Packs shall be at least fairly tight[2] or fairly well filled.[3]
( b ) Closed cartons containing apples not tray or cell packed shall be fairly well filled or the pack shall be sufficiently tight to prevent any appreciable movement of the apples.
( c ) Packs in wooden boxes or baskets shall be sufficiently tight to prevent any appreciable movement of apples within containers when the packages are closed. Each wrapped apple shall be completely enclosed by its individual wrapper.
( d ) Apples on the shown face of any container shall be reasonably representative in size, color and quality of the contents.
( e ) Tolerances: In order to allow for variations incident to proper packing, not more than 10 percent of the containers in any lot may fail to meet these requirements.
Footnotes -
51.310
[2] “Fairly tight” means that apples are of the proper size for molds or cell compartments in which they are packed, and that molds or cells are filled in such a way that no more than slight movement of apples within molds or cells is possible.
[3] “Fairly well filled” means that the net weight of apples in containers ranging from 2,100 to 2,900 cubic inch capacity is not less than 37 pounds for Cortland, Gravenstein, Jonathan, McIntosh and Golden Delicious varieties and not less than 40 pounds for all other varieties.
#### In the Matter of Robert Thompson, Respondent-Appellant, v City Manager of the City of Yonkers et al., Appellants-Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the City Manager of the City of Yonkers which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and dismissed him from his position, the parties cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 14, 1979, which, *inter alia,*modified the determination by reducing the penalty imposed. Judgment modified, on the law, by (1) deleting the first decretal paragraph thereof, (2) deleting from the second decretal paragraph thereof the words "in all other respects”, and (3) adding thereto a provision dismissing the proceeding on the merits. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The penalty of dismissal directed by the city manager, after a hearing pursuant to section 75 of the Civil Service Law, was not so "shocking to one’s sense of fairness” as to require judicial interference with the' administrative determination, which is supported by substantial evidence on the whole of the record. (See *Matter of Pell*v *Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 233; *Matter of Joshua v McGrath,*35 NY2d 886; *Matter of Bal v Murphy,*55 AD2d 26, affd 43 NY2d 762; *Matter of La Rosa v Police Dept, of City of N. Y.,*55 AD2d 890.) Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.
§ 51.2831 U.S. Export No. 1. *U.S. Export No. 1* consists of onions which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Similar varietal characteristics, except color when designated as a specialty or mixed pack;
( 2 ) Mature;
( 3 ) Dormant;
( 4 ) Fairly firm; and,
( 5 ) Fairly well shaped.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Decay;
( 2 ) Wet sunscald;
( 3 ) Doubles;
( 4 ) Bottlenecks; and,
( 5 ) Scallions.
( c ) Free from damage caused by: ( 1 ) Seedstems;
( 2 ) Splits;
( 3 ) Tops;
( 4 ) Roots;
( 5 ) Dry sunken areas;
( 6 ) Sunburn;
( 7 ) Sprouts;
( 8 ) Freezing;
( 9 ) Peeling;
( 10 ) Cracked fleshy scales;
( 11 ) Watery scales;
( 12 ) Dirt or staining;
( 13 ) Foreign matter;
( 14 ) Mechanical;
( 15 ) Translucent scales;
( 16 ) Disease;
( 17 ) Insects; and,
( 18 ) Other means.
( d ) Unless otherwise specified onions are packed in accordance with Export Packing Requirements set forth in § 51.2840. (See § 51.2837.)
[60 FR 46977, Sept. 8, 1995, as amended at 79 FR 63294, Oct. 23, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from Balance Sheets and Statement of Operations for
the year ended December 31, 1997 Form 10K of ML Delphi Premier
Partners, L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      304,000
<SECURITIES>                                891,000
<RECEIVABLES>                             507,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,702,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         0
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                             1,655,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,702,000
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            220,000
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        364,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (75,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                               (75,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (6.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0


</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Pocketguide to transportation**
 
1999
2000 | 2001| 2002 | 2003| 2004 | 2005| 2006 | 2007| 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011| 2012 | 2013
 
SuDoc Number:TD 12.8/2:
Item Number:0982-N-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000548580
 
September 4, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1027 

KA 11-00807 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL J. KEITZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

PETER O. EINSET, GENEVA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (JASON A. MACBRIDE

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F.

Kocher, J.), rendered January 5, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his guilty plea of assault in the second degree (Penal Law §

120.05 [7]). Defendant contends that he did not plead guilty or admit

guilt and thus that he was not convicted of the charge brought against

him. At the start of the plea proceeding, defendant agreed that he

would plead guilty to assault in the second degree. He indicated that

he was pleading guilty of his own free will and after having had

sufficient time to discuss it with his attorney. When County Court

asked defendant “[h]ow do you plead,” defendant responded “[y]es.” 

Thereafter, the court asked defendant specific questions about the

charge, and defendant made various admissions. We conclude that the

plea allocution as a whole establishes that “defendant understood the

charges and made an intelligent decision to enter a plea” (People v

Goldstein, 12 NY3d 295, 301). 

To the extent that defendant’s contention that he was denied

effective assistance of counsel survives his guilty plea (see People v

Bethune, 21 AD3d 1316, 1316, lv denied 6 NY3d 752), we conclude that

it lacks merit. Defendant “receive[d] an advantageous plea and

nothing in the record casts doubt on the apparent effectiveness of

counsel” (People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404). 

Entered: October 5, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1564
CAROL M. FORBES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARVIN T. RUNYON, JR., Postmaster General, CEO US Postal Service, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-14-5-H) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 16, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carol M. Forbes, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Carol M. Forbes appeals the district court's orders adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation to grant Defendant summary judgment in this action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Forbes v. Runyon , No. CA-95-14-5-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 1997, and Mar. 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### §§ 4279.246-4279.255 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DAVID CHARLES SUSSMAN,

Petitioner,

v. Case No.: 4:20cv361-MW/HTC

SECRETARY OF THE

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 39, and has also reviewed de novo Petitioner’s

objections, ECF No. 42, which simply reincorporate Petitioner’s reply to 

Respondent’s answer to his second amended petition, ECF No. 33, and Petitioner’s 

motion for release on his own recognizance, ECF No. 37. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation, ECF No. 39, is accepted and adopted, over 

the Petitioner’s objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment 

stating, “Petitioner’s second amended petition, ECF No. 11, is DENIED without an 

evidentiary hearing.” A certificate of appealability is DENIED. The 

Case 4:20-cv-00361-MW-HTC Document 43 Filed 06/02/22 Page 1 of 2
2

Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on June 2, 2022.

s/Mark E. Walker ____

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00361-MW-HTC Document 43 Filed 06/02/22 Page 2 of 2
32.006-5 Reporting.

(a) In accordance with 41 U.S.C.4506(h), the head of an agency, other than the Department of

Defense, shall prepare a report for each fiscal year in which a recommendation has been received

pursuant to 32.006-4(a). Reports within the Department of Defense shall be prepared in accordance

with 10 U.S.C. 3806(h).

(b) In accordance with 41 U.S.C.4506(h) and 10 U.S.C. 3806(h), each report shall contain-

(1) Each recommendation made by the remedy coordination official;

(2) The actions taken on the recommendation(s), with reasons for such actions; and

(3) An assessment of the effects of each action on the Government.

Parent topic: 32.006 Reduction or suspension of contract payments upon finding of fraud.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Charles M.Russell National Wildlife Refuge : guide map and information**
 
SuDoc:I 49.9:C38/2/2004
ItemNumber:0612(online)
CGPsystem Number:000933372
 
East
West
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF THE COMPANY AS FILED IN ITS 10-K (ITEM 7) FOR THE YEAR
ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND ITS 10-Q (ITEM 1) FOR THE QUARTER  ENDED  SEPTEMBER
30,  1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENT
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             119,452
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      932,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                        89,987
<INVENTORY>                                        931,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,766,374
<PP&E>                                           2,266,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,311,782
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,531,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,600,390
<BONDS>                                            237,973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            77,945
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,615,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,531,314
<SALES>                                          5,203,651
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,203,651
<CGS>                                            2,947,215
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,254,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    34,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  73,361
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (84,990)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        34,359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (50,631)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (22,860)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (73,461)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
EX-3.6
     CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                       Certificate of Amendment to
                        Articles of Incorporation
                      For Nevada Profit Corporation
      (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)

1.  Name of corporation: Justwebit.com, Inc.

2.  The articles have been amended as follows (provide article
numbers, if available):

Article IV: Stock.  The aggregate number of shares which the
corporation shall have authority to issue is 250,000,000 shares
at a par value of .001 per share.    All stock when issued shall
be fully paid and non-assessable.

3.  The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the
corporation entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the
voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be
required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may be
required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation have voted
in favor of the amendment is: 27,316,644 *

4.  Officer Signature (Required)


/s/  Gregory T. Johnson                  /s/  Gary Borglund
President                                Secretary

* If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or
any relative or other right given to any class or series of
outstanding shares, then the amendment must be approved by the vote,
in addition to the affirmative vote otherwise required, of the holders
of shares representing a majority of the voting power of each class or
series affected by the amendment regardless of limitations or
restrictions on the voting power thereof.

IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and remit
the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Ezra E. Ezra, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sopac Cellular
     Solutions Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
19th day of November, 2007.


/s/ Ezra E. Ezra
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer