alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1997
<CASH>                                          28,731
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  486,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,645
<INVENTORY>                                    359,511
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               948,542
<PP&E>                                       1,654,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                 807,725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,783,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          868,809
<BONDS>                                      1,289,186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           225
<OTHER-SE>                                     380,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,783,442
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,676,382
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,261,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               143,438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,760
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              88,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                194,563
<INCOME-TAX>                                    48,882
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            145,741
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   145,741
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.26
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

MICHELLE BARNARD

v.

THE TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE 

INSURANCE COMPANY

PETITION OF: UNITED STATES COURT 

OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 141 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2018, the Petition for Certification of 

Question of Law is GRANTED. This Court shall consider the following issue:

If an insured under a policy of insurance subject to the Pennsylvania Motor 

Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law has waived stacking but later secures 

an increase in the limit of her UIM coverage on her existing policy, must her 

insurance carrier obtain a separate waiver of her right to stack the coverage 

or does a prior waiver of the right to stack the coverage remain in effect? 

Michelle Barnard is DESIGNATED as Appellant, and Travelers Home and Marine 

Insurance Company is DESIGNATED as Appellee.

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to establish a briefing schedule and list this case 

for oral argument.
P.1 

OAR Box 1500 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

75) ll-C-101 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/5/2008 1:51:30 PM Sheet 75 of 343 
P.2 

l~~l PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

I 

.^etbeJx •*)>l -

r« v> 

25 

^1-19^ 

A-°l 4~52 

H-C-,0, 

Central Park West 

5001 South Miami Boulevard, Suite 300 

P.O. Box 12077 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2077 

(919)941-0333 

FAX (919) 941-0234 

August 19,1998 

Underwriter's Laboratories (UL) 

Mr. Neil Mahan 

12 Laboratory Drive 

P.O. Box 13995 

RTP, NC 27709-33995 

Dear Mr. Mahan: 

Melanie Proctor of Pacific Environmental Services spoke with Ed Schr.3nd on August 8, 

1998, and he indicated that you are the appropriate person whom to direct questions about testing 

of reinforced plastic products. Pacific Environmental Services is the contractor assisting the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the development of National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants for the reinforced plastic composites source category. 

While investigating the potentid economic effects of these proposed standards, we were 

asked by industry representatives to consider UL testing and certification costs in our final 

analysis. In order to aid our research on the costs associated with changing the production 

process <ind/or new materials to produce reinforced plastics, we would greatly appreciate any 

information that you can provide us on testing and certification costs. Our questions are: 

What kinds of reinforced plastics polyester resin products require certification by 

UL? (Please provide a complete list of products.) 

What types of production or raw material changes necessitate recertification? 

How much does it cost to build a prototype for testing? 

What are the typical fees for the certification and recertification process? 

Are there any addition^ costs involved? 

How long does the testing process normally require? 

Is it necessary for each size of a given product to be tested separately, even if all 

inputs and processes are the same? 

WASHINGTON, D.C. • RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC • LOS ANGELES, CA • CINCINNATI, OH 

i 
P.3 

• »44» — 

s 

Underwriter's Laboratory 

Mr. Neil Mahan 

August 19,1998 

Page 2 

• Is it necessary to have products certified for every chemic*al and every possible 

concentration? 

• Is it necessary to have tanks tested for each different manufacturing process used 

to make them even if the materials of construction .are the same? (i.e., if a 

producer has been UL certified to be produced with a given resin system by spray 

gun application, does the product have to be recertified if a flow coater or a 

pressure-fed roller is used to apply the s<ame resin system that was previously 

certified by UL?) 

If you have any questions regarding the information provided in this letter, please contact 

me at (919) 941-0333 or Dr. Madeleine Strum ofthe EPA at (919) 541-2383. Please fax the 

requested information to my attention at (919) 941-0234. 

Sincerely, 

/f 

Shawn A. McKee 

Environmental Scientist 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

cc: Madeleine Strum, EPA 

2,
Page
                Thirty One





**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Statement
      of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.**§
**1350**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
      ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as the chief financial
      officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/
                R. Alan MillerR.
                Alan MillerChief  Financial
                OfficerNovember
                13,  2007
exv10wxay





Exhibit 10(a)

Amendment to Directors Stock Compensation and Deferral Plan



Effective February 24, 2009, Article III of the Wells Fargo & Company Directors Stock Compensation
and Deferral Plan (the “Plan”) is amended to insert the following new proviso (ii) and renumber the
subsequent proviso as (iii):





“(ii) effective February 24, 2009, an additional 100,000 shares of Common Stock shall be
available for, but limited to, deferrals of Cash Compensation and dividend credits to
Deferred Stock Accounts;”
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rene Pilon, Appellant.

Motion for permission to proceed as a poor person from order denying defendant’s application to be furnished, without charge, copies of certain records, denied, on the ground that no appeal lies therefrom (Code Grim Pro., § 517). Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
§ 51.1527 Standard pack. ( a ) *Packing.* ( 1 ) All packages shall be tightly packed or well filled, according to the approved and recognized methods.
( 2 ) The plums or prunes in the top layer of any package shall be reasonably representative in quality and size of those in the remainder of the package.
( 3 ) “Well filled” means that the plums or prunes packed in loose or volume filled containers are packed within 1 inch of the top of the container.
( 4 ) “Tightly packed” means the plums or prunes are the proper size for the mold or cell compartments in which they are packed, and the molds or cells are filled in such a way that movement is not allowed.
( b ) *Marking.* ( 1 ) The size of plums or prunes shall be marked on each package, and shall be indicated in terms of minimum diameter, or number of fruit per package, or in accordance with the arrangement of the top layer of fruit in the package or subcontainer. Size may also be shown in terms of maximum number of fruit for a specified weight, such as “8 per pound,” “6.4 per pound” or “72 ⁄ 3 per pound” or by a count-size designation based on the number of fruits contained in a 10 pound sample with the designation rounded to an applicable number which is divisible by 5 (example: 40 size, 45 size, 50 size, 55 size, etc.). ( i ) *California peach boxes, lug boxes and small consumer packages.* In layer-packed California peach boxes or lug boxes, and in small layer packed consumer packages, the count of the entire contents shall be marked on the package. The number of plums or prunes in California peach boxes or lug boxes shall not vary more than 4 from the number indicated on the package. Loose filled consumer packs not in a master container shall have a count-size marked on the package or on a tag closure. Master containers of loose filled consumer packages shall have a count-size marked on the package describing the size of plums or prunes within the container.
( ii ) *Face and fill packs in cartons and lug boxes.* In face and fill packs in cartons and lug boxes the number of rows in the face shall be marked on the packages, as “6 row,” “8 row,” etc.
( c ) *Sizing.* ( 1 ) Not more than 5 percent, by count, of the plums or prunes in any package may vary more than one-fourth inch in diameter, except that not more than 5 percent, by count, of the plums or prunes 2-1/4 inches or larger in diameter and packed in loose or volume filled containers may vary more than three-eighths inch in diameter.
( 2 ) When size is indicated in terms of minimum diameter, not more than 5 percent, by count, of the fruit in any package may be smaller than the size marked.
( d ) *Tolerance for standard pack.* In order to allow for variations incident to proper sizing and packing, not more than 10 percent, by count, of the packages in any lot may fail to meet the requirements for standard pack.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

PAT McCORMICK, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) SC S50967 ) HARDY MYERS, Attorney General, ) State of Oregon, ) ) **ORDER CERTIFYING** Respondent. ) **BALLOT TITLE**

Upon consideration by the court. Petitioner’s request for oral argument is denied. Petitioner’s arguments that the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 90 (2004) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for the proposed measure. Dated this 23rd day of December 2003.

WALLACE P. CARSON, JR. CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF BOX, INC.



|                           |  |                             
|-------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary         |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|Box Intl Holdings Ltd      |  | United Kingdom              
|Box Intl Technology Ltd    |  | United Kingdom              
|Box.com (UK) Ltd           |  | United Kingdom              
|Box Deutschland GmbH       |  | Germany                     
|Box France SARL            |  | France                      
|KK Box Japan               |  | Japan                       
|Box, Canada, Inc.          |  | Canada                      
|Box.com Australia Pty Ltd. |  | Australia                   
|Crocodoc, Inc.             |  | Delaware                    
|Greply, Inc.               |  | Delaware                    
|Clariso, Inc.              |  | Delaware
Exhibit
      32.1





***CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***


***PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Sputnik Enterprises, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                David LaDukeName:    
                David LaDukeTitle:      
                President, Chief Executive Officer, andTreasurer




May
      14,
      2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Sputnik Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Sputnik Enterprises, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOHNNY TREVON COOK,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 4:20cv521-MW/MAF

MARK INCH,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation, ECF No. 3. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, as this Court’s 

opinion. This action shall be transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Southern 

District of Florida, Fort Pierce Division. The Clerk shall take all steps necessary to 

effect the transfer and close the file. 

SO ORDERED on March 1, 2021.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00521-MW-MAF Document 4 Filed 03/01/21 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-52 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TRACY BOWEN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CENTURION OF FLORIDA, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

CASE NO. 3:20cv5823-TKW/EMT

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff Tracy Bowen hereby notifies this Honorable Court that the parties have 

reached a settlement in principle. The settlement documents are currently being 

prepared, and the parties will file a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice upon 

consummation of the settlement.

Respectfully submitted this 10th day of June, 2021.

TEIN MALONE PLLC

Counsel for Plaintiff

/s/ Gaye L. Huxoll ________

Gaye L. Huxoll

Florida Bar No. 149497

ghuxoll@teinmalone.com

(305) 442-1101

Case 3:20-cv-05823-TKW-EMT Document 26 Filed 06/10/21 Page 1 of 1
47.305-15 Loading responsibilities of

contractors.

(a)

(1) Contractors are responsible for loading, blocking, and bracing carload shipments as specified in

standards published by the Association of American Railroads.

(2) The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at 52.247-58,

Loading, Blocking, and Bracing of Freight Car Shipments, when supplies may be shipped in carload

lots by rail.

(b) If the nature of the supplies or safety, environmental, or transportability factors require special

methods for securing the supplies on the carrier’s equipment, or if only a special mode of

transportation or type vehicle is appropriate, the contracting officer shall include in solicitations

detailed specifications that have been coordinated with the transportation office.

Parent topic: 47.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
(January 16, 1980)

#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v John Hooks, Defendant.

— Application for writ of habeas corpus denied. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
EX-10.2






EXHIBIT 10.2




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE

POLYONE SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective December 31, 2007)




          PolyOne Corporation (the “Company”) hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 to the PolyOne
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective December 31, 2007) (the
“Plan”), effective March 20, 2009. Words and phrases used herein with initial capital letters that
are defined in the Plan are used herein as so defined.




I.





Section 8 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:




“SECTION 8. EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS




As of each payroll period, the Employer shall allocate to the account of each
Participant an amount equal to the difference between, (a) the retirement
contributions that would otherwise be contributed on behalf of the Participant under
Section 4.2(b) of the Retirement Plan if the provisions of the Retirement Plan were
administered without regard to the limitations imposed by Sections 401(a)(17) and
415 of the Code and (b) the retirement contributions made on his or her behalf under
the Retirement Plan for such payroll period.”



II.




          The first sentence of Section 11 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as
follows:





“A Participant shall be 100% vested in that portion of his or her account which is
attributable to elective deferrals made under Section 5, employer matching
contributions made under Section 7 and the employer contributions made prior to
March 21, 2009 under Section 8 that correspond to transition contributions under
Section 4.2(c) of the Retirement Plan.”



[Signature on Following Page]




 









 









EXECUTED as of the 15th day of January, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	POLYONE CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	
 	 
	 	 	Gordon D. Harnett 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chair, Compensation and
Governance Committee 	 




2
#### § 46.8 Copies of licenses.

Copies of licenses may be issued upon request and upon the payment of a fee of two dollars ($2) for each copy. Each copy shall bear the word “copy” in conspicuous letters on its face and shall be certified by the Director as a true copy of the original.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Battaglia, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered May 16, 1979, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Lazer, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TRANSMONTAIGNE INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          36,186
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,173
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    212,524
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               379,575
<PP&E>                                         364,762
<DEPRECIATION>                                (43,541)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 778,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          238,725
<BONDS>                                        208,309
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    170,115
<COMMON>                                           310
<OTHER-SE>                                     160,684<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   778,143
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,214,091
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,210,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (504)<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    434
<INCOME-TAX>                                       165<F3>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                269
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,857)<F4>
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES ($1,278) UNEARNED COMPENSATION
<F2>OTHER INCOME, NET OF OTHER EXPENSES
<F3>EXPENSE
<F4>NET LOSS AVAILABLE FOR COMMON STOCKHOLDERS AFTER $2,126 PREFERRED STOCK
DIVIDENDS.
</FN>


</TABLE>