alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re HINRICHS’ ESTATE.

(Surrogate’s Court, New York County.

July 25, 1914.)

Taxation (§ 868*)—Transfer Tax—Estate of Married Woman.

Since it is only when a woman dies leaving a husband but “no” descendants that the husband takes her property jure mariti, where a woman died intestate, a resident of New Jersey leaving property in New York, and a husband and children surviving her, her property passed according to the intestate laws of the state of her domicile, and the property in New York was subject to transfer taxation.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Taxation, Cent. Dig. §§ 1685-1687; Dec. Dig. § 868.*]

Judicial settlement of the estate of Mamie Hinrichs, deceased. Application to declare the estate located in New York exempt from transfer tax.

Denied.

Bruce W. Dennis, of Goshen, for William H. Hinrichs.

Thomas E. Rush, of New York City, for State Comptroller.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ numrer in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep’r Indexes

FOWLER, S.

This is an application to declare the estate of decedent in this state exempt from transfer tax. The decedent, who was a resident of New Jersey, died intestate on the 12th of August, 1910. She was survived by her husband and four children. The petitioner contends that under the authority of the Matter of Green, 144 App. Div. 232, 129 N. Y. Supp. 54, her estate is not subject to a tax in this state. The Matter of Green decided that the personal property of a married woman dying intestate who was survived by her husband, but by no descendants, was not subj ect to a tax. It is only when a woman dies leaving a husband, but no descendants, that the husband takes her personal property jure mariti. Barnes v. Underwood, 47 N. Y. 351; Matter of Russell, 168 N. Y. 178, 61 N. E. 166. As the decedent herein was survived by her husband and children, the property passed in the manner and in the proportion prescribed by the intestate laws of the state of her domicile. The distribution of her personal property is governed by the law of New Jersey (Cross v. U. S. Trust Co., 131 N. Y. *914330, 30 N. E. 125, 15 L. R. A. 606, 27 Am. St. Rep. 597); but the papers submitted on this application contain no proof of the statute law of that state. An appraiser will be designated to appraise the estate in this state for the purpose of the transfer tax.

The application to withdraw the petition heretofore filed for letters of administration upon the estate of decedent cannot be considered in a transfer tax proceeding; it should be made the subject of a separate proceeding.
#### ROTH, Respondent, v. MAUTNER et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 20, 1906.)

Action by Ignatz Roth against Julius Mautner and another. S. Bacon, for appellants. H. A. Friedman, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### § 51.1530 Mature.

“Mature” means that the fruit has reached the stage of maturity which will insure a proper completion of the ripening process.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

BRANDON R. SMITH,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-168-AW-GRJ

CAMPUS LODGE GAINESVILLE,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, ECF 

No. 26, to which no objection has been filed. Although the copy mailed to Plaintiff 

was returned as undelivered, ECF No. 27, Plaintiff was provided a copy by hand

upon an October 2021 visit to the clerk’s office.

It is now ORDERED:

1. The report and recommendation (ECF No. 26) is adopted and 

incorporated into this order.

2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19) is 

GRANTED.

3. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 21) is DENIED.

4. If Defendant wishes to move for sanctions, it must do so no later than 

January 20, 2022. After any such motion is resolved—or after the deadline passes 

with no motion—final judgment will enter.

Case 1:20-cv-00168-AW-GRJ Document 29 Filed 01/12/22 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED on January 12, 2022. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00168-AW-GRJ Document 29 Filed 01/12/22 Page 2 of 2
§ 51.772 Fairly smooth texture. *Fairly smooth texture* means that the skin is fairly thin and not coarse for the variety and size of the fruit. “Fairly thin” means that the skin thickness does not average more than 1 ⁄ 2 inch (12.7 mm), on a grapefruit 41 ⁄ 8 inches (104.8 mm) in diameter.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CHASE ANDERSON ROMAGNANO,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:19cv3558-RV-HTC

ESCAMBIA COUNTY AREA

TRANSIT (“ECAT”),

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated December 9, 2019. (Doc. 6). The parties have been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that 

the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:19cv3558-RV-HTC

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of February, 2020.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 15-1 Filed 03/10/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 15-1 Filed 03/10/21 Page 2 of 2
|   | (1) | such      Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,      2009, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of National Bankshares,  Inc. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ JAMES G. RAKES                                                          |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| James      G. RakesChairman,      President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. Case No. 4:99cr23-RH

Case No. 4:03cv9-RH/WCS

NGHIA LE,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

At the conclusion of the hearing, I left open the possibility that either party may

submit the FDC movement records of Defendant Le for the period close to June 11,

1999, but did not set a deadline. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that if either party wishes to submit these records,

the party shall do so on or before August 8, 2005. The report and recommendation on

this § 2255 motion will be entered after that date.

DONE AND ORDERED on August 2, 2005.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 4:99-cr-00023-RH-CAS Document 181 Filed 08/02/05 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23.2**

** **

**Consent of Independent Auditors**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 333-218594) pertaining to the 2017 Equity Incentiveand 2017 Non-Employee Director Plans of KCAP Financial, Inc. of our report dated March 7, 2018, with respect to the combined financialstatements of the Asset Manager Affiliates, included in KCAP Financial Inc.’s Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2017, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

 

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP

New York, New York

February 26, 2019
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge,  the annual  report on Form 10-KSB (the  "Report")  of ANTs  software
inc., a Delaware  corporation (the  "Company"),  for the year ended December 31,
2005:

         1. fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be
deemed a part of this  Report,  nor is it to be  deemed  to be  "filed"  for any
purpose whatsoever.

Date:    March 29, 2006             By:  /s/ Boyd Pearce
         --------------                  ---------------------------------------
                                         Boyd Pearce, Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  has  been  provided  to the  Company,  and  will be
retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5



       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1991

<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1991

<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         6,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,901)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          151,438
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       177,833
<OTHER-SE>                                     (329,271)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (151,438)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,670
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,670)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,670)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,670)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)
        


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.507 Violations based on false filings and nonperformance of agreements with the Agency or SBA. The following shall constitute a violation of this part: ( a ) *Nonperformance.* Failure to perform any of the requirements of any Debenture or of any written agreement with the Agency or SBA.
( b ) *False statement.* In any document submitted to the Agency or SBA: ( 1 ) Any false statement knowingly made; or
( 2 ) Any misrepresentation of a material fact; or
( 3 ) Any failure to state a material fact.
( 4 ) A material fact is any fact that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which the statement was made.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30418]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12347 and <greek-i>12348]


Arizona Disaster <greek-i>AZ-00012

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Arizona 
(FEMA-1940-DR), dated 10/04/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 07/20/2010 through 08/07/2010.

DATES: Effective Date: 10/04/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/03/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/05/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State or 
Arizona, dated 10/04/2010, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Area: The Hopi Tribe.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-30418 Filed 12-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
( Pennsylvania Department
of Environmental Protection Mr. Donald
S. Welsh Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region ifi (3RAOO) 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 Dear Mr. Welsh: Rachel Carson State Office Building P.O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 November

8, 2006 On behalf of the Allegheny County Health Department, the Department
of Environmental Protection

is submitting the enclosed amendments

to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) The revisions are to Allegheny County’s portion of the Pennsylvania SIP consisting of chgesto Allegheny County’s Article XXI Air Pollution Control Rules and Regulations. The regulition changes concern Stage II Control of Gasoline Dispensing Facilities and the addition of 40 CFR Part 51 Modeling Requirements and are being tracked internally
as Revision Numbers 43 and 55, respectively. Thank you for yourattention

to this matter. If you have any questions, please contact Joyce E. Epps, Director of the Bureau of Air Quality, by e-mail atjeepps@state.pa.us

or by telephone
at 717-787-9702

or Dr. Roger C. Westman, Manager of the Air Quality Program, Allegheny Health Department,
by e-mail at Rwestman@achd.net

or by telephone
at 412-578-8103. Enclosures

Printed onRecycled Paper C ; Secretary RECEPIED NOV152006 EPA, REGION
III OFFICE OF REGIONAL ADMINJSTRATOR 717-787-2814

I rin IPitctb §ishici (321) An Equal Opportunity Employer www.dep.state.pa.us((fMr.DonaldS.Welsh2bee:SecretaryOfficeWARMJoyceKEppsRogerWestmanARMReadingFileA
#### Leon J. Greenspan, as Parent and Natural Guardian of David Greenspan, Appellant, v Arthur P. Antin et al., Respondents.

— In an action brought by Leon J. Greenspan, as parent and natural guardian of David Greenspan for (1) a judgment declaring that Manson Donaghey, as principal of White Plains High School, the White Plains Board of Education and the individual defendants had no right to suspend the infant David Greenspan without a full due process hearing and (2) an injunction permanently restraining said defendants from suspending said infant, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 8, 1979, as denied plaintiff a preliminary injunction *662enjoining said defendants from implementing their suspension order and determined, *inter alia,*that the plaintiff was not entitled to an adversary-type hearing. Order modified by adding provisions thereto (1) converting the action into an article 78 proceeding to review the determination suspending plaintiff’s son (see CPLR 7803, subd 3) and (2) dismissing the petition. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. In our view, plaintiff’s remedy should have been by way of an article 78 proceeding and, accordingly, it is so converted (see CPLR 103, subd [c]). Turning to the merits, it is our belief that under the circumstances of the instant case, the informal, presuspension conference accorded plaintiff’s son fully comported with his "due process” rights (see *Goss v Lopez,*419 US 565; Education Law, § 3214, subd 3, par d); and the measure of discipline imposed upon the child’s admission of guilt (a two-day suspension) was neither excessive nor shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see *Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222). Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
#### § 4284.1116 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32











CERTIFICATION
BY CEO AND CFO PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT











CERTIFICATION





The
undersigned hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2009 of BNL FINANCIAL CORPORATION (the “Company”) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.








/s/
      Wayne E.
      AhartDate:
      November 13, 2009
              
              Name: Wayne
      E. AhartTitles:  Chairman of the
      Board of Directorsand Chief Executive Officer/s/
      Barry N. ShamasDate:
      November 13, 2009
              
              Name:
      Barry N. ShamasTitles:  Executive Vice President,Chief Operating Officer
                and
      Chief Financial Officer











A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to BNL FINANCIAL CORPORATION and
will be retained by BNL FINANCIAL CORPORATION and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
Certification is not “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act
or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This
Certification is not incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act.




E-3
§ 4284.1101 Purpose. This subpart contains the procedures and requirements for providing the following financial assistance under the Rural Innovation Stronger Economy (RISE) program: ( a ) Grants for the purpose of constructing, purchasing, or equipping a building to serve as an innovation center in order to establish job accelerators.
( b ) Grants for the purpose of establishing and supporting job accelerators and related programs.
#### §§ 5001.133-5001.139 [Reserved]
#### § 51.2845 Wet sunscald.

*Wet sunscald* means sunscald which is soft, mushy, sticky or wet.
§ 52.81 Plant survey. Prior to a plant being approved, or the inauguration of in-plant inspection services, and at such intervals as may be deemed necessary or appropriate, the Administrator will make, or cause to be made, a survey and inspection of the plant where such inspection services are to be performed to determine whether the plant and methods of operation are suitable and adequate for the performance of such service in accordance with: ( a ) The regulations in this part, including, but not limited to, the requirements contained in §§ 52.81 through 52.83; and
( b ) The terms and provisions of any contract pursuant to which the service is to be performed: *Provided,* That, such survey(s) shall be repeated at least yearly.
Certificate of Forgiveness of Indebtedness of Residential Capital LLC



 Exhibit 10.6 
 EXECUTION VERSION 
 CERTIFICATE OF 
 FORGIVENESS OF INDEBTEDNESS 
 OF RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC 
 This Certificate of Forgiveness of Indebtedness of Residential Capital, LLC is given this 30th day of January, 2009 by GMAC LLC
(“GMAC”). 
 WHEREAS, GMAC owns the indebtedness of Residential Capital, LLC (“ResCap”) set forth on
Schedule I hereto (the “ResCap Debt”). 
 WHEREAS, GMAC has agreed to deliver the ResCap Debt to ResCap as consideration
under that certain Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of the date hereof (“MIPA”), between GMAC and ResCap, which ResCap Debt will be cancelled by ResCap. 
 NOW THEREFORE, GMAC hereby: 
 1. Pursuant to
the MIPA, agrees to transfer the ResCap Debt to ResCap for cancellation; 
 2. Forgives, as of the date hereof, all amounts owing or to
become owing in respect of the ResCap Debt, including the principal amount thereof and any accrued but unpaid interest relating thereto; 
 3. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS RESCAP AND ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES AND AGENTS, AND ANY AND ALL OTHER INDIVIDUALS, FIRMS OR CORPORATIONS AS MAY NOW OR HEREAFTER BE ACTING AS TRANSFER AGENT, TRUSTEE,
REGISTRAR OR AS AGENT IN ANY OTHER CAPACITY (COLLECTIVELY, THE “INDEMNIFIED GROUP”), FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, ACTIONS, AND SUITS, WHETHER GROUNDLESS OR OTHERWISE, AND FROM OR AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITIES, LOSSES,
DAMAGES, COSTS, CHARGES, ATTORNEYS’ FEES, AND OTHER EXPENSES OF EVERY NATURE AND CHARACTER WHICH ANY OF THEM MAY SUSTAIN OR INCUR (I) BY REASON OF ANY CLAIM WHICH MAY BE MADE IN RESPECT OF A BONA FIDE PURCHASER OF THE RESCAP DEBT AFTER THE
DATE HEREOF, (II) BY REASON ANY PAYMENT, TRANSFER, DELIVERY, EXCHANGE OR OTHER ACT WHICH ANY OF THEM MAY MAKE OR DO IN RESPECT OF THE RESCAP DEBT IF GMAC TRANSFERS THE RESCAP DEBT AFTER THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPT AS CONTEMPLATED BY PARAGRAPH 1 ABOVE, OR
(III) OTHERWISE ARISING OUT OF THE MATTERS SET FORTH IN THIS CERTIFICATE, WHETHER OR NOT CAUSED BY, BASED UPON, OR ARISING FROM THE INADVERTANCE, ACCIDENT, OVERSIGHT, OR THE SOLE, JOINT OR CONCURRENT NEGLIGENCE OF ANY OF THE INDEMNIFIED GROUP AND/OR
OMISSION OF FAILURE TO INQUIRE INTO, CONTEST, OR LITIGATE THE RIGHT OF ANY HOLDER OF THE RESCAP DEBT TO RECEIVE ANY BENEFITS THEREOF; and 
 ResCap hereby agrees to cancel the ResCap debt. 








			
	GMAC LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert S. Hull

	Name:	 	Robert S. Hull
	Title:	 	EVP and CFO


 Acknowledged and agreed: 
  

			
	Residential Capital, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James N. Young

	Name:	 	James N. Young
	Title:	 	CFO








 SCHEDULE I 
 Indebtedness of ResCap owned by GMAC that will be contributed to ResCap 
  

						
	 CUSIP No. or
 Common Code
	  	 Description
	  	Principal Amount
at Maturity
	 76114EAE2
	  	8.5% Notes due May 15, 2010	  	$	825,801,000
	 U7613PAB1
	  	8.5% Notes due May 15, 2010	  	$	4,710,000