alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 52.55 Political activity.

All inspectors and licensed samplers are forbidden, during the period of their respective appointments or licenses, to take an active part in political management or in political campaigns. Political activities in city, county, State, or national elections, whether primary or regular, or in behalf of any party or candidate, or any measure to be voted upon, are prohibited. This applies to all appointees or licensees, including, but not limited to, temporary and cooperative employees and employees on leave of absence with or without pay. Wilful violation of this section will constitute grounds for dismissal in the case of appointees and revocation of licenses in the case of licensees.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR NOONEY INCOME FUND LTD. II, L.P. AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>          0000757764
<NAME>         NOONEY INCOME FUND LTD. II, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,198,239
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,278
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,294,517
<PP&E>                                      16,006,791
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,571,449
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,381,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          499,146
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,561,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,381,036
<SALES>                                      2,530,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,537,164
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,155,686
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             463,758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (82,280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (82,280)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Sanitized

ECOSAR Version 1.11 Results Page

SMILES : [ ]

CHEM : [ ]

CAS Num: [ ]

ChemID1: 

MOL FOR: [ ]

MOL WT : [ ]

Log Kow: 2.978 (EPISuite Kowwin v1.68 Estimate)

Log Kow: (User Entered)

Log Kow: (PhysProp DB exp value - for comparison only)

Melt Pt: (User Entered for Wat Sol estimate)

Melt Pt: (deg C, PhysProp DB exp value for Wat Sol estimate)

Wat Sol: 27.47 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate)

Wat Sol: (User Entered)

Wat Sol: (PhysProp DB exp value)

--------------------------------------

Values used to Generate ECOSAR Profile

--------------------------------------

Log Kow: 2.978 (EPISuite Kowwin v1.68 Estimate)

Wat Sol: 27.47 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate)

------------------------------------------------

Available Measured Data from ECOSAR Training Set

------------------------------------------------

 No Data Available

--------------------------------------

ECOSAR v1.1 Class-specific Estimations

--------------------------------------

Neutral Organics

 Predicted

ECOSAR Class Organism Duration End Pt mg/L (ppm)

================= ============= ============= =========== ==========

Neutral Organics : Fish 96-hr LC50 19.930

Neutral Organics : Daphnid 48-hr LC50 12.386

Neutral Organics : Green Algae 96-hr EC50 13.404

Neutral Organics : Fish ChV 2.167

Neutral Organics : Daphnid ChV 1.553

Neutral Organics : Green Algae ChV 4.292

Neutral Organics : Fish (SW) 96-hr LC50 25.238
Neutral Organics : Mysid 96-hr LC50 9.669

Neutral Organics : Fish (SW) ChV 4.978

Neutral Organics : Mysid (SW) ChV 0.625

Neutral Organics : Earthworm 14-day LC50 252.459 *

Note: * = asterisk designates: Chemical may not be soluble enough to measure this predicted effect. If 

the effect level exceeds the water solubility by 10X, typically no effects at saturation (NES) are reported.

------------------------------

Class Specific LogKow Cut-Offs

------------------------------

If the log Kow of the chemical is greater than the endpoint specific cut-offs

presented below, then no effects at saturation are expected for those endpoints.

Neutral Organics:

----------------

Maximum LogKow: 5.0 (Fish 96-hr LC50; Daphnid LC50, Mysid LC50)

Maximum LogKow: 6.0 (Earthworm LC50)

Maximum LogKow: 6.4 (Green Algae EC50)

Maximum LogKow: 8.0 (ChV)
42.709-7 Contract clause.

Use the clause at 52.242-3, Penalties for Unallowable Costs, in all solicitations and contracts over

$800,000 except fixed-price contracts without cost incentives or any firm-fixed-price contract for the

purchase of commercial products or commercial services. Generally, covered contracts are those

which contain one of the clauses at 52.216-7, 52.216-16, or 52.216-17, or a similar clause from an

executive agency’s supplement to the FAR.

Parent topic: 42.709 Penalties for Unallowable Costs.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Entremetrix Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott W. Absher, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)        Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Dated:          August 14, 2006 | /s/ Scott W. Absher  |
|---------------------------------|----------------------|
|                            | By:  Scott W. Absher |
|                            | Its:  President      |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Entremetrix Corporation and will be retained by Entremetrix Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:90cr4051-WS

NATHANIEL JAMES, 4:10cv99-WS/WCS

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 675)

docketed March 16, 2010. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

motion for dismissal of the indictment (doc. 674) be summarily dismissed. The

defendant has filed objections (doc. 676) to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record in light of the defendant’s objections, the court has

determined that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 675) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. The defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment (doc. 674) is summarily

DISMISSED as an attempt to file a second or successive § 2255 motion without

authorization from the court of appeals.
Page 2 of 2

3. Because any appeal of this order is not taken in good faith, a certificate of

appealability shall not issue. 

4. The defendant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 673) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of April , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DATE: December 15, 2011 

TO: SJVUAPCD Governing Board 

• San Joaquin Valley 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT HEALTHY AIR LIVING' 

GOVERNING BOARD 

J. Steven Worthley, Chair 

Supervisor, ...Lire Cooly 

Ann Johnston, Vice Chair 

Mayor, City of Stockton 

Tony Barba 

Supervisor, Kings County 

Judith G. Case 

Supervisor, Fresno County 

Ronn Dominici 

Supervisor, Madera County 

Henry Jay Forman, Ph.D. 

Appointed by GOYerimt 

Randy Miller 

Mayor, City uf Talt 

William O'Brien 

Supervisor, Stanislaus County 

Leroy Ornellas 

Supervisor, San Joaquin County 

Alexander C. Sherriffs, M.D. 

Appointed by Governor 

Chris Vierra 

Mayor, City of Coes 

Hub Walsh 

Supervisor, tylerced County 

Raymond A. Watson 

Supervisor, Kern County 

Vacant 

Small Cily Representative, Kings County 

Vacant 

Large City Representative. Tulare County 

Seyed Sadredin 

Executive Director 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

Northern Region Office 

4800 Enterprise Way 

Modesto, CA 95356-8718 

12N 557-8400 • FAX 20915516475 

Central Fiegion Office 

1990 East Gettysburg Avenue 

Fresno, CA 93726.0244 

15591 230.6000 • FAX I5591 230-6061 

Soutlion Region Office 

34946 Flyovel Court 

Bakersfield, CA 93308.9725 

16611392-5500 • FAX l6611 392.5585 

FROM: Seyed Sadredin, Executive Director/APCO 

Project Coordinator: Errol Villegas 

RE: ADOPT PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO RULE 4352 (SOLID 

FUEL FIRED BOILERS, STEAM GENERATORS AND 

PROCESS HEATERS) 

RECOMMENDATION: 

1 Adopt Proposed Amendments to Rule 4352 (Solid Fuel Fired 

Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters). 

2. Authorize the Chair to sign the attached Resolution. 

BACKGROUND: 

As an extreme nonattainment area for federal ozone standards, the 

District is required to implement Reasonably Available Control 

Technology (RACT) standards for sources that have the potential to 

emit 10 tons per year or more of oxides of nitrogen (N0x) or volatile 

organic compounds (VOCs). Your Board most recently adopted 

amendments to Rule 4352 (Solid Fuel Fired Boilers, Steam 

Generators and Process Heaters) in September 2006 to lower the 

applicability threshold and require more sources to meet the 

emissions limitations of the rule. After adoption, the rule was 

submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for 

evaluation and inclusion as an amendment to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). 

The EPA evaluated the amended rule and determined that while the 

rule largely meets RACT requirements, several issues needed to be 

further evaluated to fully satisfy RACT. The District has conducted a 

thorough analysis and is proposing amendments that are expected to 

result in full EPA approval of Rule 4352. The proposed amendments 

include lowering NOx emission limits for various fuel categories and a 

%WM ve4eyairorg
Order entered De cember 22, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-19-01262-CR

LUIS CASTILLO-CORONADO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F17-71315-R

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we ORDER the Dallas County

District Clerk to delete the $250 DNA fee assessed in appellant ’s “Cost Bill.” See

In re Daniel , 396 S.W.3d 545, 549 (Tex. Crim . App. 2013) (ordering county

district clerk to delete inappr opriate assessment of costs).

/s/ DAVID EVANS
JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM ZEON CORPORATION'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000796513
<NAME> ZEON CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                         133,778
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  239,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,700)
<INVENTORY>                                    200,285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               606,681
<PP&E>                                         387,590
<DEPRECIATION>                               (311,950)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 724,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          187,796
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,017
<OTHER-SE>                                     501,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   724,087
<SALES>                                      2,152,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,152,713
<CGS>                                        1,390,410
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,390,410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               767,815
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,512)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,512)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,512)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2269 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2269

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 200 West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, as the ``Tony Hall Federal 
                Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2006

  Mr. DeWine (for himself, Mr. Voinovich, and Mr. Nelson of Florida) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 200 West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, as the ``Tony Hall Federal 
                Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF TONY HALL FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES 
              COURTHOUSE.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 200 
West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the 
``Tony Hall Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the Tony Hall Federal Building and United States Courthouse.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

                       Certification of ANTs software inc.
           pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002
                 regarding Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
                      fiscal year ended December 31, 2002

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of ANTs software inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

      1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. Information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  March 21, 2003           By:   /s/ Francis K. Ruotolo
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Francis K. Ruotolo, Chairman,
                                      Chief Executive Officer and President


Date:  March 21, 2003           By:   /s/ Kenneth Ruotolo
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Kenneth Ruotolo
                                      Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
# 36.520 Contracting by negotiation.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert in *solicitations* for *construction* the provision at 52.236-28, Preparation of *Offers*-*Construction*, when *contracting* by negotiation.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 24 - 00140 - CV LAMPASAS DRUG COMPANY , LTD. D/B/A CATTLES PHARMACY , A PPELLANT V. JULIA SANTAMARIA , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 27th District Court Lampasas County, Texas Trial Court No . 23150 , Honorable John T. Gauntt , Presiding 

### July 23 , 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant, Lampasas Drug Company, Ltd. d/b/a Cattles Pharmacy (“Lampasas ” ), appeals from the trial court’s Order Overruling Defendant’s Objections to Chapter 74 Expert Report of Sergei Grando, M.D . 1 We dismiss the untimely appeal for want of jurisdiction. We previously remanded this cause to the trial court to rule on Lampasas’ Rule 306a motion for additional time to file a notice of appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 4.2(a); T EX .

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73.001.2

R. C IV . P . 306a. 5 . On remand, the trial court issued an Order Denying Rule 306a(5) Motion and findings and conclusions of law. According to the se findings, t he trial court signed the Order Overruling Defendant’s Objections to Chapter 74 Expert Report of Sergei Grando, M.D . on February 6 , 2024. The order was delivered electronically that day to all parties, including Lampasas’ counsel. Consequently , Lampasas’ notice of appeal was due twenty days thereafter , by February 2 6 , 2024. See T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE A NN . § 51.014(a)(9) (permitting interlocutory appeal), 74.351(b); T EX . R. A PP . P . 26.1(b), 28.1(b) (concerning accelerated appeals). Lampasas did not file a notice of appeal until March 25 , 202 4, after the fifteen - day extension period . See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3 . A timely notice of appeal is essential to invoking our jurisdiction. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.1(b), 26.1 ; Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 616 – 17 (Tex. 1997 ). Notwithstanding that the Texas Supreme Court has directed us to construe the Rules of Appellate Procedure reasonably and liberally so that the right of appeal is not lost by imposing requirements not absolutely necessary to effect the purpose of those rule s, we are prohibited from enlarging the time for perfecting an appeal in a civil case. See Verburgt , 959 S.W.2d at 616 – 17; T EX . R. A PP . P . 2 (providing that we may not suspend a rule ’ s operation or order a different procedure to alter the time for perfecting an appeal). Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal, grant Appellee Julia Santamaria ’s previously - filed motion to dismiss , and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 2 The appeal is dismissed. P er Curiam

2 We also deny Lampasas’ pending motion to extend the time to file a notice of appeal.
#### Irene Robbins v. Elliot Robbins.

Motion for a stay granted on condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before January 5, 1967, with notes of issue for January 17, 1967, and upon the further conditions that defendant pays the sum of $1,586 to the Devereux Foundation of Devon, Pennsylvania, before December 30, 1966; that he continue to pay to the Devereux Foundation all current charges as. they accrue for the maintenance of his son Harry at the Devereux School, and that the defendant stipulate with the plaintiff within five days after the entry of the order herein to pay all penalties and interest on the village, school and sanitary sewer district taxes of the Village and Town of Searsdale, which taxes are presently outstanding for the year 1966 in the sum of $2,418.16 to the extent those penalties and interest have accrued and will accrue until the date defendant pays to plaintiff $3,000 of the sum required to be paid by the order appealed from. Upon defendant’s failure to comply with any of the foregoing conditions, an order may be entered ex parte vacating the stay. Concur—■ Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.
§ 460.13 Accounting for PCCP amounts. ( a ) The amount under PCCP will not be paid directly to eligible producers. FCIC and AIPs will account for the amount when calculating total producer premium due. AIPs will adjust participant bills accordingly. All bills follow the same terms and conditions specified in the crop insurance policy, regardless of PCCP amounts.
( b ) PCCP premium support will be provided via premium billing adjustments by the applicable RMA premium billing date for the insured crop.
( c ) PCCP premium support is available both for eligible insured acres and for eligible WFRP acres associated with the same planted acreage of qualifying cover crops.
( d ) The payment limitations in 7 CFR 760.1507 are not applicable to PCCP.
( e ) RMA will obtain cover crop records from FSA and determine eligibility such that eligible producers do not need to take any additional specific action through their crop insurance agent to enroll in the PCCP. ( 1 ) In the event that any PCCP amount is determined to be incorrect, the amount will be recalculated until the 2022 reinsurance year annual settlement date of October 6, 2023, unless otherwise specified by the RMA Administrator.
( 2 ) After October 6, 2023, the amount will be final except in cases of misrepresentation, fraud, scheme, or device.
§ 53.8 How to obtain service. ( a ) *Application.* Any person may apply to the Director or Chief for service under the regulations with respect to livestock in which the applicant is financially interested. The application shall be made on a form approved by the Director.
( b ) *Notice of eligibility for service.* The applicant for service will be notified whether his application is approved.
( c ) *Request by applicant for service* —(1) *Noncommitment.* Upon notification of the approval on an application for service, the applicant may, from time to time as desired, make oral or written requests for service under the regulations with respect to specific livestock for which the service is to be furnished under such application. Such requests shall be made at a market news office either directly or through any employee of the Agricultural Marketing Service who may be designated for such purposes.