alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 2/20/2012

Sample Number: 120715-001 Date Collected: 02/15/2012 08:00 Date Received: 2/15/2012

1st Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 422 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 02/17/2012 12:56 EPA 200.8

Sample Number: 120715-002 Date Collected: 02/15/2012 08:00 Date Received: 2/15/2012

2nd Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 12.9 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 02/17/2012 13:01 EPA 200.8

Sample Number: 120715-003 Date Collected: 02/15/2012 08:00 Date Received: 2/15/2012

Bioreactor Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 1.59 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 02/17/2012 13:06 EPA 200.8

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 120715 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amended Annual
Report of China Unitech Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A-1 for the
year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date here of (the "report"), I, Xuezheng Yuan, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated this 29th day of
June, 2009.








XUEZHENG
      YUANXuezheng
      YuanChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLCO-921000-L13200000-EL0000-LVELC10CC770; COC-74219]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is correcting the Notice of Availability of the Environmental Assessment (EA) and Notice of Public Hearing for the Sage Creek Holdings, LLC, Federal Coal Lease Application, COC-74219 published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 13, 2010 [75 FR 49512]. The BLM incorrectly stated that the EA was complete and available for release. The BLM subsequently determined that additional information should have been included in the cumulative impact section of the EA. The BLM will be issuing a revised EA, which will be available for a 30-day comment period upon completion. After the end of the comment period, the BLM will hold a public hearing on the EA, the fair market value and the maximum economic recovery of the proposed leased tract.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kurt M. Barton, Land Law Examiner, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, CO 80215 at (303) 239-3714,                         *Kurt_Barton@blm.gov,*                         or Jennifer Maiolo, Mining Engineer, 455 Emerson Street, Craig, CO 81625 at 970-826-5077,                         *Jennifer_Maiolo@blm.gov.*

Helen M. Hankins,

State Director.

[FR Doc. 2010-29864 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
52.215-6 Place of Performance.

As prescribed in 15.209(f), insert the following provision:

Place of Performance (Oct 1997)

(a) The offeror or respondent, in the performance of any contract resulting from this solicitation, □

intends, □ does not intend [check applicable block] to use one or more plants or facilities located at

a different address from the address of the offeror or respondent as indicated in this proposal or

response to request for information.

(b) If the offeror or respondent checks "intends" in paragraph (a) of this provision, it shall insert in

the following spaces the required information:

Place of Performance (Street Address,

City, State, County, ZIP Code)

Name and Address of Owner and Operator of the

Plant or Facility if Other than Offeror or

Respondent

____________________ _______________________

____________________ _______________________

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.215 [Reserved]
#### § 54.16 Marking of products.

All products examined for class and grade under the official standards, or the immediate containers and the shipping containers, shall be stamped, branded, or otherwise marked with an appropriate official identification. Except as otherwise directed by the Director, such markings will not be required when an applicant desires only an official memorandum. The marking of products, or their containers, as required by this section shall be done by official graders or under their immediate supervision.

[84 FR 48557, Sept. 16, 2019]
#### In the Matter of Town of Greenburgh, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin, III, as Commissioner of the State of New York Office of Mental Retardation and Development Disabilities, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the State of New York Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, dated February 16, 1979, which, after a hearing, found that the establishment of a community residence facility at a contested location would be appropriate. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The sole issue to be resolved at a hearing to contest the appropriateness of the establishment of a community residence facility pursuant to section 41.34 of the Mental Hygiene Law is whether "the nature and character of the area in which the facility is to be based would be substantially altered as a result of establishment of the facility” (§ 41.34, subd [b], par [5]). Aside from conclusory allegations by petitioner’s residents and officials, no testimony adduced indicated that such alteration would occur. In contrast, respondents’ officials stated that in applying the criteria set forth in "Zoning For a New Kind of Family”, a publication of the Westchester County Department of Planning, they concluded that the proposed facility was sufficiently isolated from other facilities so as to avoid undue concentration and the resulting neighborhood change. Substantial evidence supported the commissioner’s determination. Although the decision was terse, we conclude that it was adequate since there were no facts which would indicate that substantial alteration of the community would occur. Mollen P. J., Titone, O’Connor and Mangano, JJ., concur.
#### § 51.20 Issuance of corrected certificates.

A corrected inspection certificate may be issued by the inspector who issued the original certificate after distribution of a certificate if errors, such as incorrect dates, grade statements, lot or car numbers, identification marks, types of containers, sizes, weights, quantities, or errors in any other pertinent information require the issuance of a corrected certificate. Whenever a corrected certificate is issued, such certificate shall supersede the inspection certificate which was issued in error and the superseded certificate shall become null and void after the issuance of the corrected certificate.
44.203 Consent limitations.

(a) The contracting officer’s consent to a subcontract or approval of the contractor’s purchasing

system does not constitute a determination of the acceptability of the subcontract terms or price, or

of the allowability of costs, unless the consent or approval specifies otherwise.

(b) Contracting officers shall not consent to-

(1) Cost-reimbursement subcontracts if the fee exceeds the fee limitations of 15.404-4(c)(4)(i);

(2) Subcontracts providing for payment on a cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost basis;

(3) Subcontracts obligating the contracting officer to deal directly with the subcontractor;

(4) Subcontracts that make the results of arbitration, judicial determination, or voluntary settlement

between the prime contractor and subcontractor binding on the Government; or

(5) Repetitive or unduly protracted use of cost-reimbursement, time-and-materials, or labor-hour

subcontracts (contracting officers should follow the principles of 16.103(c)).

(c) Contracting officers should not refuse consent to a subcontract merely because it contains a

clause giving the subcontractor the right of indirect appeal to an agency board of contract appeals if

the subcontractor is affected by a dispute between the Government and the prime contractor.

Indirect appeal means assertion by the subcontractor of the prime contractor’s right to appeal or the

prosecution of an appeal by the prime contractor on the subcontractor’s behalf. The clause may also

provide that the prime contractor and subcontractor shall be equally bound by the contracting

officer’s or board’s decision. The clause may not attempt to obligate the contracting officer or the

appeals board to decide questions that do not arise between the Government and the prime

contractor or that are not cognizable under the clause at 52.233-1, Disputes.

Parent topic: Subpart 44.2 - Consent to Subcontracts
# 22.1505 Solicitation provision and contract clause.

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of 22.1503, insert the provision at 52.222-18, Certification Regarding Knowledge of Child Labor for Listed *End Products*, in all *solicitations* that are expected to exceed the *micro-purchase threshold* and are for the *acquisition* of *end products* (regardless of country of origin) of a type identified by country of origin on the *List of Products Requiring Contractor Certification as to Forced or Indentured Child Labor*, except *solicitations* for *commercial products* or *commercial services* that include the provision at 52.212-3, *Offeror* Representations and Certifications—*Commercial Products* and *Commercial Services*. The *contracting officer**must* identify in paragraph (b) of the provision at 52.222-18, Certification Regarding Knowledge of Child Labor for Listed *End Products*, or paragraph (i)(1) of the provision at 52.212-3, any applicable *end products* and countries of origin from the List. For *solicitations* estimated to equal or exceed $50,000, the *contracting officer**must* exclude from the List in the *solicitation**end products* from any countries identified at 22.1503(b), in accordance with the specified thresholds.

(b) Insert the clause at 52.222-19, Child Labor-Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies, in all *solicitations* and contracts for the *acquisition* of *supplies* that are expected to exceed the *micro-purchase thresholds*.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 22.15 - Prohibition of Acquisition of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child Labor
11.604 Solicitation provision and contract

clause.

(a) Contracting officers shall insert the provision at 52.211-14, Notice of Priority Rating for National

Defense, Emergency Preparedness, and Energy Program Use, in solicitations when the contract to

be awarded will be a rated order.

(b) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 52.211-15, Defense Priority and Allocation

Requirements, in contracts that are rated orders.

Parent topic: Subpart 11.6 - Priorities and Allocations
June 24, 2015

Mr. Chris Woodbury UTC Aerospace - HMTF

P.O. Box 1218 Hurricane, UT 84737

Dear Mr. Woodbury:

This letter is to inform you that we are unabl e to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

− 2015

− 1396) on May 5, 2015, but we are unable to process your request any furthe r. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR fr om which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adve rsely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equa l to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or ar guments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any fu rther, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requi res you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days , we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additiona l time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
§ 6.42 Complaints of price-undercutting. ( a ) *Submission of complaint.* Any person who has reason to believe that the price at which any article of quota cheese is offered for sale or sold in the United States on a duty-paid wholesale price basis is less than the domestic wholesale market price of similar articles produced in the United States and that a foreign government is providing a subsidy with respect to such article of quota cheese may file with the Investigating Authority a written complaint making such allegation.
( b ) *Contents of complaint.* Such complaint shall contain, or be accompanied by, information to substantiate complainant's allegations, in substantially the following form: ( 1 ) The name and address of the complainant.
( 2 ) The location of the domestic wholesale market in which price-undercutting is alleged to be occurring.
( 3 ) The article of quota cheese involved in the alleged price-undercutting.
( 4 ) The country of origin of such article of quota cheese.
( 5 ) The similar domestic article, the price of which the complainant believes is being undercut.
( 6 ) The month and year that the complainant first concluded that the price-undercutting was taking place.
( 7 ) To extent known to the complainant, all pertinent facts with regard to the alleged subsidy, and, if known, the statutory or other authority under which it is paid, the manner in which it is paid, and the value of such subsidy when received and used by producers or sellers of such quota cheese.
( 8 ) All other information which the complainant believes substantiates the allegation of price-undercutting, including the complainant's estimate of the domestic wholesale market price of the similar article produced in the United States and the duty-paid wholesale price of the quota cheese involved. If available, samples of the domestic and imported cheese products should be submitted.
28.106-5 Consent of surety.

(a) When any contract is modified, the contracting officer shall obtain the consent of surety if-

(1) An additional bond is obtained from other than the original surety;

(2) No additional bond is required and-

(i) The modification is for new work beyond the scope of the original contract; or

(ii) The modification does not change the contract scope but changes the contract price (upward or

downward) by more than 25 percent or $50,000; or

(3) Consent of surety is required for a novation agreement (see subpart 42.12).

(b) When a contract for which performance or payment is secured by any of the types of security

listed in 28.204 is modified as described in paragraph (a) of this subsection, no consent of surety is

required.

(c) Agencies shall use Standard Form 1414, Consent of Surety, for all types of contracts.

Parent topic: 28.106 Administration.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Access to InformationEducational ResearchEducational ResourcesElectronic JournalsElectronic PublishingHigher EducationInformation RetrievalInformation ServicesInformation SourcesInformation TechnologyResource MaterialsScholarly JournalsSearch StrategiesWorld Wide Web

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
# L_2013298EN.01002701.xml

| 8.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 298/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 298/27

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1112/2013

of 5 November 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Pan de Alfacar (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Pan de Alfacar’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Pan de Alfacar’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pan de Alfacar’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pan de Alfacar’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 November 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 70, 9.3.2013, p. 31.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products and foodstuffs listed in Annex I(I) to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012:

Class 2.4.   Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker’s wares

SPAIN

Pan de Alfacar (PGI)

---
#### § 51.702 Damage.

*Damage* means any specific defect described in Table 1 to § 51.713; or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which materially detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the fruit.

[85 FR 68427, Oct. 29, 2020]
16.202 Firm-fixed-price contracts.

16.202-1 Description.

16.202-2 Application.

Parent topic: Subpart 16.2 - Fixed-Price Contracts
49.503 Termination for convenience of the

Government and default.

(a) Cost-reimbursement contracts-

(1) General use. Insert the clause at 52.249-6, Termination (Cost-Reimbursement), in solicitations

and contracts when a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated, except contracts for research

and development with an educational or nonprofit institution on a no-fee basis.

(2) Construction. If the contract is for construction, the contracting officer shall use the clause with

its AlternateI.

(3) Partial payments. If the contract is with an agency of the U.S. Government or with State, local, or

foreign governments or their agencies, and if the contracting officer determines that the

requirement to pay interest on excess partial payments is inappropriate, the contracting officer shall

use the clause with its AlternateII. In such contracts for construction, the contracting officer shall

use the clause with its AlternateIII.

(4) Time-and-material and labor-hour contracts. If the contract is a time-and-material or labor-hour

contract, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its AlternateIV. If the contract is with an

agency of the U.S. Government or with State, local, or foreign governments or their agencies, and if

the contracting officer determines that the requirement to pay interest on excess partial payments is

inappropriate, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its Alternate V.

(b) Insert the clause at 52.249-7, Termination (Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer), in solicitations and

contracts for architect-engineer services, when a fixed-price contract is contemplated.

(c) Subcontracts. The prime contractor may find the clause at 52.249-6, Termination (CostReimbursement), suitable for use in cost-reimbursement subcontracts; provided, that the

relationship between the contractor and subcontractor is clearly indicated. Inapplicable conditions

(e.g., paragraphs (e), (j) and (n)) should be deleted and the period for submitting the subcontractor’s

termination settlement proposal should be reduced (e.g.,6 months).

Parent topic: Subpart 49.5 - Contract Termination Clauses
#### § 51.758 U.S. No. 2 Russet.

The requirements for this grade are the same as for U.S. No. 2 except that at least 10 percent of the fruit shall have more than one-half of their surface, in the aggregate, affected by any type of discoloration. For tolerances see § 51.760.