alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10_42.htm


    
      EXHIBIT
10.4 2 

    

     

    No:
C-B-07

    


    


    Hangzhou
Bank Co. Ltd.

    


    Financing
Guarantee Letter

    


    


    


    To:
Shenzhen Branch, Hangzhou Bank Co. Ltd.

    


    I am
willing to provide the debtor Shenzhen SCM Shenzhen Ltd., which signs the
Comprehensive Financing Line Contract (No. 2009SC000000841 ) with irrevocable
jointly and severally guarantee liabilities.

    


    Guarantee
validity: since the starting day of the obligation performance of the principal
contract till 2 years after the expiration date.

    


    Security
range: RMB43,750,000.00 (including bill discounts, acceptance, guarantee,
advance for L/C), interest (including compound interest) and penalty rate,
penalty, compensation and all the notary, evaluation, auction, litigation, legal
expenses occurred in order to recall the creditor rights.

    


    I
recognize and accept the validity of the Comprehensive Financing Line Contract
and this Financing Guarantee Letter, and commit to carry it out conscientiously.
In case of other guarantee or warranty of the principal claim guaranteed besides
that agreed in this Financing Guarantee Letter, it shall not influence any of
your rights and its fulfillment under this Financing Guarantee Letter, and I
shall not raise a plea against you on this basis.

    


    


    


    


    
      ID
number:  US Passport 076641972 

      


      Address: 
Apt. 12C, Bldg D, Emerald Palace, Splendid Garden, Overseas China Town,
Shenzhen, PRC 

       

      Telephone
No.:    +86-755-2661-1260 

      


      Postal
Code:   518053 

    

    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    Guarantor
(chop): Hantao Cui

    /s/Hantao
Cui

    


    April
2009
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. Case No. 1:94cr1036-MW/GRJ

JAMES R. YOUNG,

Petitioner,

_______________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 290, and has also reviewed de novo Petitioner’s 

objections to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 291. Accordingly

IT IS ORDERED: 

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Petitioner’s 

objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The 

amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, ECF No. 280, is 

summarily DENIED and DISMISSED. Petitioner’s Motion Request for an 

Emergency Conditional Release Order, ECF No. 282, his Renewed Motion, ECF 
2 

No. 286, and his Motion for Release to Home Confinement, ECF No. 289, are 

DENIED. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.” The Clerk shall also close 

the file.

SO ORDERED on March 11, 2020.

s/ MARK E. WALKER

Chief United States District Judge
§ 52.3182 Varietal types of dried prunes. ( a ) *Type I.* French; or Robe; or a mixture of French and Robe.
( b ) *Type II.* Italian.
( c ) *Type III.* Imperial; or Sugar; or a mixture of Imperial and Sugar.
( d ) *Type IV.* Any other types; or mixtures of any types other than mixtures in Type I and Type III of this section.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 20039 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Gaylan Lavan,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02
- CR
- 141 - 1

**________________________ ______**  Before **Smith, Higginson,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gaylan Lavan has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lavan has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant por tions of the recor d.

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 27, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-20039 Document: 00516910705 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/27/2023No. 23
- 20039

2 We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non
frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.**  42.2 . Case: 23-20039 Document: 00516910705 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/27/2023
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 4:02-cr-45-SPM-GRJ

THYRON CORNELL RICHARDSON,

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s Traverse, which the Court

construes as a request for an evidentiary hearing and a request to grant the

Defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2255 (“Defendant’s 2255 motion”). (Doc. 399.) Defendant requests (i) that the Court

conduct an evidentiary hearing on Defendant’s 2255 motion and (ii) grant Defendant’s

2255 motion because the Government failed to respond to the Defendant’s 2255

motion by April 25, 2011 as directed by a prior Order in this case. (Doc. 391.) The

Government has, however, filed a motion to extend the time within to respond to the

Defendant’s 2255 motion (Doc. 397), which the Court granted in an order extending the

deadline to file a response until May 25, 2011. (Doc. 398.)

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s motion (Doc. 399) is

DENIED as MOOT. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 3 day of May 2011. 

rd

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ERNEST R. GIBSON, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-363-AW-MAF

HARPER,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Ernest Gibson is a state inmate. He has sued “Harper,” a laundry supervisor, 

in his or her individual capacity. ECF No. 1. The magistrate judge issued a report 

and recommendation, recommending the court transfer the case to the Middle 

District. As the magistrate judge notes, the institution where the defendant works 

and where the alleged incidents occurred is in that district. The plaintiff has had an 

opportunity to object, but no objection has been filed.

It is now ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) is adopted and 

incorporated into this order.

2. The clerk will take necessary steps to transfer this case to the United 

States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division.

3. The clerk will then close the file.

Case 4:20-cv-00363-AW-MAF Document 8 Filed 09/24/20 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED on September 24, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00363-AW-MAF Document 8 Filed 09/24/20 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Irven Murdaugh, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County,

rendered November 10, 1965, affirmed (Code Crim. Pro., § 542). Ughetta, Acting P. J.,- Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
#### § 56.33 Report of violations.

Each grader shall report, in the manner prescribed by the Administrator, all violations of and noncompliance with the Act and the regulations in this part of which such grader has knowledge.

[71 FR 42010, July 24, 2006]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Floyd, Appellant.

Supreme Court, New York County, rendered January 11, 1980, unanimously affirmed. Appellant’s appeal from the judgment rendered October 6, 1978, is dismissed, since by reason of resentence that judgment was vacated and the judgment rendered January 11, 1980 *780substituted therefor, and it is only from that judgment that an appeal lies. The order of this court entered on May 8, 1980 is vacated. No opinion. Concur—Ross, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman, Bloom and Yesawich, JJ.
#### § 33.3 Secretary.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States or any officer or employee of the United States Department of Agriculture to whom authority has heretofore been delegated or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated to act in his stead.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOHN DOE 1, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 5:03-cv-260/MCR

JOSEPH R. FRANCIS, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

On February 4, 2003, the Court entered an order (see doc. 43) staying this case

pending the outcome of parallel criminal proceedings. At this time, the Clerk is

directed to close the file in this case for administrative purposes only.

ORDERED on this 22nd day of June, 2004.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

United States District Judge

Case 5:03-cv-00260-RS-WCS Document 60 Filed 06/22/04 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 3406
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3406 appear at 76 FR 4809, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3406.27 Other Federal statutes and regulations that apply. ( a ) The Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) issued guidance on Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards at 2 CFR part 200 on December 26, 2013. In 2 CFR 400.1, the Department adopted OMB's guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 200, as supplemented by 2 CFR part 400, as the Department's policies and procedures for uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for federal awards. As a result, this regulation contains references to 2 CFR part 200 as it has regulatory effect for the Department's programs and activities.”
( b ) Several other Federal statutes and/or regulations apply to grant proposals considered for review or to research project grants awarded under this part. These include but are not limited to:
2 CFR part 200—Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, And Audit Requirements For Federal Awards. 2 CFR part 180 and Part 417—OMB Guidelines To Agencies On Government-Wide Debarment And Suspension (Nonprocurement) And USDA Nonprocurement Debarment And Suspension 7 CFR part 1c—USDA implementation of the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. 7 CFR 1.1—USDA implementation of Freedom of Information Act. 7 CFR part 3—USDA implementation of OMB Circular A-129 regarding debt collection. 7 CFR part 15, subpart A—USDA implementation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 7 CFR part 3407—NIFA procedures to implement the National Environmental Policy Act; 29 U.S.C. 794 (section 504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973) and 7 CFR part 15B (USDA implementation of statute)—prohibiting discrimination based upon physical or mental handicap in Federally assisted programs; and 35 U.S.C. 200 *et seq.*—Bayh-Dole Act, controlling allocation of rights to inventions made by employees of small business firms and domestic nonprofit organizations, including universities, in Federally assisted programs (implementing regulations are contained in 37 CFR part 401).
[79 FR 75999, Dec. 19, 2014]
Subpart 31.7 - Contracts with Nonprofit

Organizations

Parent topic: Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

31.701 Purpose.

This subpart provides the principles for determining the cost applicable to work performed by

nonprofit organizations under contracts with the Government. A nonprofit organization, for purpose

of identification, is defined as a business entity organized and operated exclusively for charitable,

scientific, or educational purposes, of which no part of the net earnings inure to the benefit of any

private shareholder or individual, of which no substantial part of the activities is carrying on

propaganda or otherwise attempting to influence legislation or participating in any political

campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office, and which are exempt from Federal income

taxation under section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code.

31.702 General.

The OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200, subpart E and appendix IV, sets forth principles for

determining the costs applicable to work performed by nonprofit organizations (as defined in the

OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200) under contracts (as well as grants and other

agreements) with the Government. See 31.108 for exceptions to the cost principles for nonprofit

organizations.

31.703 Requirements.

(a) Contracts which refer to this subpart 31.7 for determining allowable costs shall be deemed to

refer to, and shall have the allowability of costs determined by the contracting officer in accordance

with, the OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200, subpart E and appendix IV in effect on the date

of the contract.

(b) Agencies are not expected to place additional restrictions on individual items of cost. However,

under 10 U.S.C. 3744 and 41 U.S.C.4304, the costs cited in 31.603(b) are unallowable.
19–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 2d Session 107–774

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES COMMITTEE

NOVEMBER 13 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 12), 2002.—Referred to the House 

Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 601] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 601, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any special rule 

reported on the legislative day of Wednesday, November 13, 2002, 

providing for consideration or disposition of a bill to establish the 

Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2625 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2625

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1-octadecanaminium, N,N-
      di-methyl-N-octadecyl-, (SP-4-2)-[29H,31H-phtha-locyanine-2-
             sulfonato(3-)-kN29,kN30,kN31,kN32]cuprate(1-).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 2006

  Mr. Voinovich (for himself and Mr. DeWine) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1-octadecanaminium, N,N-
      di-methyl-N-octadecyl-, (SP-4-2)-[29H,31H-phtha-locyanine-2-
             sulfonato(3-)-kN29,kN30,kN31,kN32]cuprate(1-).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-OCTADECANAMINIUM, N,N-DI-METHYL-N-OCTADECYL-, (SP-4-2)-
              [29H,31H-PHTHA-LOCYANINE-2-SULFONATO(3-)-
              KN29,KN30,KN31,KN32]CUPRATE(1-).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.26 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 1-octadecanaminium, N,N-di-
methyl-N-octadecyl-, (SP-4-2)-[29H,31H-phtha-locyanine-2-sulfonato(3-)-
kN29,kN30,kN31,kN32]cuprate(1-)) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' 
and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 52.40 Identification of lots sampled.

Each lot from which officially drawn samples are selected shall be marked in such manner as may be prescribed by the Administrator, if such lots do not otherwise possess suitable identification.
Case 5:97-cv039-RH Document 20Filed 4/159 Page1of 5Case 5:97-cv039-RH Document 20Filed 4/159 Page2of 5Case 5:97-cv039-RH Document 20Filed 4/159 Page3of 5Case 5:97-cv039-RH Document 20Filed 4/159 Page4of 5Case 5:97-cv039-RH Document 20Filed 4/159 Pageof5
#### § 51.1547 Application of tolerances.

Individual samples shall have not more than double the tolerances specified, except that at least one defective and one off-size potato may be permitted in any sample: *Provided,* That en route or at destination one-tenth of the samples may contain three times the tolerance permitted for potatoes which are frozen or affected by soft rot or wet breakdown: *And provided further,* That the averages for the entire lot are within the tolerances specified for the grade.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOSE ORTIZ RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:03cv63-RH/WCS

JOHN D. RYALS, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

It appearing that this matter is ready to be set for trial,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. By separate notice, the clerk shall set this matter for pretrial 

conference by telephone.

2. At least two weeks prior to the pretrial conference, each party shall

file with the clerk of the court, with a copy provided to all other parties, a list of

witnesses and exhibits to be offered at trial, including rebuttal and impeachment

witnesses and exhibits. No witness will be allowed to testify, and no exhibit will

be admitted in evidence, unless listed in accordance with this paragraph.

SO ORDERED this 25th day of May, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:03-cv-00063-RH-WCS Document 42 Filed 05/25/05 Page 1 of 1
Mark Lee Employment Offer



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 

 
 March 30, 2009 
 Mark Lee

 1544 Ridgeway Drive 
 Glendale, CA 91202 
 Dear Mr. Lee, 
 It is a pleasure to extend an offer of employment to you for the position of Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer. You will report directly to the President and Chief Executive Officer. 
 Your first day of employment will be May 1, 2009. The following will confirm the terms of your employment with Nara Bank. 
  

	1.	Salary. Your annualized gross salary will be $200,000 ($7,692.31 bi-weekly gross). 

  

	2.	Restricted Units. You will be granted 10,000 performance units vesting over five years at 20% a year on each anniversary day. The grant will be subject to Bancorp Board
approval. 

  

	3.	Annual Performance Incentive Plan Bonus. You will be included in the annual performance incentive plan on a prorated bonus in 2009, which is subject to restrictions under
TARP. 

  

	4.	Change of Control. You will be eligible for one year’s base salary and accrued bonus, if any, upon a change of control subject to the recent TARP legislation.


  

	5.	Car allowance. You will be paid a car allowance of $1,150 per month ($530.77 per pay period). 

  

	6.	Benefits. You are eligible to participate in any life insurance, benefits, as well as vacation, sick leave, medical, dental, vision, 401(k), and ESOP, and any other employee
benefits plans normally provided to other executives of the Bank. 

 You understand that as an employee with Nara Bank you will
have access to confidential and proprietary information, which we consider private and protect adamantly. We also resolve any disputes between you and us by arbitration. Therefore, this offer is conditioned on your execution and delivery of an
Arbitration Agreement, which is enclosed with this letter. We are an at-will organization which means either party may terminate the relationship at any time with or without cause and with or without notice. You will also need to complete an on-line
background check. The link is http://candidatelink.com/NaraBank. (You will need to write down the user ID provided when you sign-on.) 
 I am
delighted to extend this offer to you and look forward to working together. Please indicate your acceptance of this offer by signing one copy of this letter and Arbitration Agreement. The terms of this offer supersede any prior representations or
terms, whether expressed orally or in writing. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Min Kim
	Min Kim,
	President and Chief Executive Officer

  

					
	Acceptance:	 		 	
			
	  	 		 	  
	Mark Lee	 		 	Date
			
	Attachments: Arbitration Agreement
- /app03/pdfs/597cv/000/39/14453t/00020001.tif
- /app03/pdfs/597cv/000/39/14453t/00020002.tif
- /app03/pdfs/597cv/000/39/14453t/00020003.tif
- /app03/pdfs/597cv/000/39/14453t/00020004.tif
- /app03/pdfs/597cv/000/39/14453t/00020005.tif
Exhibit 12.2

Certification by the Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Louis T. Hsieh, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 on Form 20-F/A to annual report on Form 20-F of New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: August 3, 2009



By:

/s/    Louis T. HsiehName:

Louis T. HsiehTitle:

President and Chief Financial Officer