alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
28.101-1 Policy on use.

(a) A contracting officer shall not require a bid guarantee unless a performance bond or a

performance and payment bond is also required (see 28.102 and 28.103). Except as provided in

paragraph (c) of this subsection, bid guarantees shall be required whenever a performance bond or

a performance and payment bond is required.

(b) All types of bid guarantees are acceptable for supply or service contracts (see annual bid bonds

and annual performance bonds coverage in 28.001). Only separate bid guarantees are acceptable in

connection with construction contracts. Agencies may specify that only separate bid bonds are

acceptable in connection with construction contracts.

(c) The chief of the contracting office may waive the requirement to obtain a bid guarantee when a

performance bond or a performance and payment bond is required if it is determined that a bid

guarantee is not in the best interest of the Government for a specific acquisition (e.g., overseas

construction, emergency acquisitions, sole-source contracts). Class waivers may be authorized by

the agency head or designee.

Parent topic: 28.101 Bid guarantees.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 155 East Tropicana, LLC, a Nevadalimited-liability company and 155 East Tropicana Finance Corp., a Nevadacorporation (collectively, the “Company”) for the three months ended March 31,2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Neil G. Kiefer, as President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Neil G. Kiefer      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Neil G. Kiefer,         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| May 14, 2010       |   |

 

 

The foregoing certificationsare being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and are not being filedas part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
From: Garth Tayler <gtayler@brick.com> 

Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 3:46 PM 

To: Nizich, Sharon 

Cc: 'Susan Miller'; Terry Schimmel 

Subject: Memo: Mercury data 

Dear Sharon 

Further to tour recent conference call with Susan Miller, Terry Schimmel and other Task Force 

members on 6/25/2015, I submit for your information a short memo explaining a recent 

development in the industry that we did not mention on the call. 

Please don’t hesitate to call if you have questions. 

Thank you 

Dr. Garth Tayler 

Technical Director 

Acme Brick Company 

Fort Worth, Texas. 

(817) 907 1208 (cell) 

(817) 8708354 (office) 

<< NBRCMERCURY.docx >>
#### In the Matter of Sylvia H., Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, entered September 12, 1979, which, upon an adjudication that appellant was a juvenile delinquent in that she committed an act, which if done by an adult, would constitute the crime of escape in the second degree, placed her in the custody of the Division for Youth, Title III. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and petition dismissed. A person in need of supervision who runs away from a Title II nonsecure facility in which she has been placed cannot, solely by virtue of that act, be adjudicated a juvenile delinquent in that she committed an act, which if done by an adult, would constitute the crime of escape in the second degree (see *Matter of Freeman,*103 Misc 2d 649; *cf. State in Interest of M. S.,*73 NJ 238). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
# 52.203-4 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.203 [Reserved]
#### § 51.1545 Size.

(a) The minimum size, or minimum and maximum sizes may be specified in connection with the grade in terms of diameter or weight of the individual potato, or in accordance with one of the size designations in Table I or Table II: *Provided,* That sizes so specified shall not be in conflict with the basic size requirements for the grade.

(b) When size is designated as shown in Table II, the corresponding weight ranges shall apply. These size designations may be applied to potatoes packed in any size container: Provided, that the weight ranges are within the limits specified.

Table 1

| Size designation | Minimum diameter1 or weight | | Maximum diameter1 or weight | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Inches | Ounces | Inches | Ounces |
| Creamer | 3/4 | (3) | 15/8 | (3) |
| Chef | 23/4 | 8 | 41/2 | 28 |
| Size A2 | 17/8 | (3) | (3) | (3) |
| Size B | 11/2 | (3) | 21/4 | (3) |
| Small | 13/4 | (3) | 21/2 | 6 |
| Medium | 21/4 | 5 | 31/4 | 10 |
| Large | 3 | 10 | 41/2 | 28 |
| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Diameter means the greatest dimension at right angles to the longitudinal axis, without regard to the position of the stem end. | | | | |
| 2 In addition to the minimum size specified, a lot of potatoes designated as Size A shall contain at least 40 percent of potatoes which are 21/2 inches in diameter or larger or 6 ounces in weight or larger. | | | | |
| 3 No requirement. | | | | |

Table II

[Ounces]

| Size designation | Minimum weight | Maximum weight |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Under 50 | 15 | |
| 50 | 12 | 19 |
| 60 | 10 | 16 |
| 70 | 9 | 15 |
| 80 | 8 | 13 |
| 90 | 7 | 12 |
| 100 | 6 | 10 |
| 110 | 5 | 9 |
| 120 | 4 | 8 |
| 130 | 4 | 8 |
| 140 | 4 | 8 |
| Over 140 | 4 | 8 |

[[35 FR 18258](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/35-FR-18258), Dec. 1, 1970, as amended at [37 FR 2745](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/37-FR-2745), Feb. 5, 1972. Redesignated at [42 FR 32514](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/42-FR-32514), June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at [46 FR 63203](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/46-FR-63203), Dec. 31, 1981; amended at [56 FR 7553](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/56-FR-7553), Feb. 25, 1991; [73 FR 15055](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/73-FR-15055), Mar. 21, 2008; [73 FR 70585](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/73-FR-70585), Nov. 21, 2008]
§ 52.809 Character. ( a ) *General.* The factor of character refers to the physical characteristics of the flesh of the cherries.
( b ) *(A) classification.* Frozen red tart pitted cherries that have a good character may be given a score of 27 to 30 points. “Good character” means that the cherries are thick-fleshed and have a firm, tender texture.
( c ) *(B) classification.* Frozen red tart pitted cherries that have a reasonably good character may be given a score of 24 to 26 points. Frozen red tart pitted cherries that fall into this classification shall not be graded above U.S. Grade B, regardless of the total score for the product (this is a limiting rule). “Reasonably good character” means that the cherries may be reasonably thick-fleshed and slightly soft.
( d ) *(C) classification.* Frozen red tart pitted cherries that have a fairly good character may be given a score of 21 to 23 points. Frozen red tart pitted cherries that fall into this classification shall not be graded above U.S. Grade C, regardless of the total score for the product (this is a limiting rule). “Fairly good character” means that the cherries may be thin-fleshed and may be soft but not mushy, or slightly tough but not leathery.
( e ) *(SStd.) classification.* Frozen red tart pitted cherries that fail to meet the requirements for Grade C may be given a score of 0 to 20 points and shall not be graded above Substandard, regardless of the total score for the product (this is a limiting rule).
36.509 Protection of existing vegetation,

structures, equipment, utilities, and

improvements.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-9, Protection of Existing Vegetation,

Structures, Equipment, Utilities, and Improvements, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price

construction contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements contract

is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

The contracting officer may insert the clause in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price

construction or a fixed-price contract for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements is

contemplated and the contract amount is expected to be at or below the simplified acquisition

threshold.

Parent topic: Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
47.305-10 Packing, marking, and

consignment instructions.

(a) Acquisition documents shall include packing and marking requirements necessary to prevent

deterioration of supplies and damages due to the hazards of shipping, handling, and storage, and,

when appropriate, marking in accordance with the requirements of 49 CFR 172.300.

(b) Contracts shall include complete consignment and marking instructions at the time the contract

is awarded to ensure that supplies are delivered to proper destinations without delay. If complete

consignment information is not initially known, the contracting officer shall issue amended delivery

instructions under the Changes clause of the contract (see 43.205) as soon as the information

becomes known.

(c) If necessary to meet required delivery schedules, the contracting officer may issue instructions

by telephone or electronic means. The contracting officer shall confirm telephonic instructions in

writing, and confirm electronic instructions if the contracting officer did not receive confirmation of

receipt.

(d) Marking and consignment instructions for military shipments shall conform to the current issue

of MIL-STD-129 (Military Standard Marking for Shipment and Storage) and other applicable DoD

regulations. Shipments for civilian agencies shall be marked as specified in Federal Standard 123,

Marking for Domestic Shipment (Civil Agencies).

Parent topic: 47.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
##### 



Exhibit 32.11
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Brookshire Raw Materials (U.S.) Accelerated Core CDN Fund, a series
of the Brookshire Raw Materials (U.S.) Trust.
 /s/ John MarshallJohn MarshallChief Executive Officer of Brookshire Raw
Materials Management, LLC, the Managing Owner
of Brookshire Raw Materials (U.S.) Trust/s/ Stephen AdamsStephen AdamsChief Financial Officer of  Brookshire Raw
Materials Management, LLC, the Managing Owner
of Brookshire Raw Materials (U.S.) Trust
52.214-25 Step Two of Two-Step Sealed

Bidding.

As prescribed in 14.201-6(t), insert the following provision:

Step Two of Two-Step Sealed Bidding (Apr 1985)

(a) This invitation for bids is issued to initiate step two of two-step sealed bidding under subpart 

14.5 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

(b) The only bids that the Contracting Officer may consider for award of a contract are those

received from bidders that have submitted acceptable technical proposals in step one of this

acquisition under _________________[the Contracting Officer shall insert the identification of the stepone request for technical proposals].

(c) Any bidder that has submitted multiple technical proposals in step one of this acquisition may

submit a separate bid on each technical proposal that was determined to be acceptable to the

Government.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.214 [Reserved]
##### 



Exhibit 32.9
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Brookshire Raw Materials (U.S.) Energy CDN Fund, a series of the
Brookshire Raw Materials (U.S.) Trust.
 /s/ John MarshallJohn MarshallChief Executive Officer of Brookshire Raw
Materials Management, LLC, the Managing Owner
of Brookshire Raw Materials (U.S.) Trust/s/ Stephen AdamsStephen AdamsChief Financial Officer of  Brookshire Raw
Materials Management, LLC, the Managing Owner
of Brookshire Raw Materials (U.S.) Trust
161 So.2d 280

#### Willie Thomas GRAHAM v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Franklin State Bank & Trust Company.

No. 47100.

March 16, 1964.

In re: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company applying for certiorari, -or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, :Second Circuit, Parish of Tensas. 159 .So.2d 333.

The application is denied. According to the facts, as found to be by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in •.the judgment complained of.
#### § 58.729 Forming containers.

Containers either lined or unlined shall be assembled and stored in a sanitary manner to prevent contamination. The handling of containers by filler crews should be done with extreme care and observance of personal cleanliness. Preforming and assembling of pouch liners and containers shall be kept to a minimum and the supply rotated to limit the length of time exposed to possible contamination prior to filling.
31.108 Contracts with nonprofit

organizations.

Subpart 31.7 provides principles and standards for determining costs applicable to contracts with

nonprofit organizations other than educational institutions (see subpart 31.3), State and local

governments (see subpart 31.6), and those nonprofit organizations exempted under the OMB

Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200, appendix VIII (see subpart 31.2 for the cost principles

applicable to nonprofit organizations exempt from the cost principles in the OMB Uniform Guidance

at 2 CFR part 200).

Parent topic: Subpart 31.1 - Applicability
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.



--------------------------------------------------------------------





In connection with the Annual  Report of Zulu Energy Corp. (the "Company") on Form  10-KSB for the  year  ended  June 30, 2007,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Satyendra Deshpande, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: October 10, 2007



/s/ Satyendra Deshpande

Satyendra Deshpande, Principal Accounting Officer
42.1303 Stop-work orders.       (a) 						            Stop-work orders may be used, when appropriate, in any negotiated fixed-price or cost-reimbursement supply, research and development, or service contract if work stoppage may be required for reasons such as advancement in the state-of-the-art, production or engineering breakthroughs, or realignment of programs.                                          (b) 						            Generally, a stop-work order will be issued only if it is advisable to suspend work pending a decision by the Government and a supplemental agreement providing for the suspension is not feasible. Issuance of a stop-work order shall be approved at a level higher than the contracting officer. Stop-work orders shall not be used in place of a termination notice after a decision to terminate has been made.                                          (c) 						            Stop-work orders should include-                                                         (1) 								                A description of the work to be suspended;                                                            (2) 								                Instructions concerning the contractor’s issuance of further orders for materials or services;                                                            (3) 								                Guidance to the contractor on action to be taken on any subcontracts; and                                                            (4) 								                Other suggestions to the contractor for minimizing costs.                                                                             (d) 						            Promptly after issuing the stop-work order, the contracting officer should discuss the stop-work order with the contractor and modify the order, if necessary, in light of the discussion.                                          (e) 						            As soon as feasible after a stop-work order is issued, but before its expiration, the contracting officer shall take appropriate action to-                                                         (1) 								                Terminate the contract;                                                            (2) 								                Cancel the stop-work order (any cancellation of a stop-work order shall be subject to the same approvals as were required for its issuance); or                                                            (3) 								                Extend the period of the stop-work order if it is necessary and if the contractor agrees (any extension of the stop-work order shall be by a supplemental agreement).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 42.13 - Suspension of Work, Stop-Work Orders, and Government Delay of Work
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nehemiah Nash, Appellant.

Submitted July 9, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 dismissed upon the ground that no application for leave to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 will lie from an order of a single Justice of the Appellate Division.
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

RUSSELL LOIOLA, a legally incapacitated person,

by JEFFREY FRIED, Personal Representative,

Plaintiff

- Appellee, UNPUBLISHED

August 6, 2020

v No. 348670

Washtenaw Circuit Court

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF

AMERICA, LC No. 16

- 001044

- NF

Defendant,

and

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE

MIDWEST,

Defendant

- Appellant.

Before: M ETER

, P .J., and B ECKERING and O’B RIEN , JJ.

B ECKERING

, J . ( concurring ).

I concur in the result only.

/s/ Jane M. Beckering
#### § 520.1 General statement.

These procedures assure that research and other activities of the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) comply with the intent of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and appropriate regulations implementing this Act. These procedures incorporate and supplement, and are not a substitute for, CEQ regulations under 40 CFR parts 1500-1508, and Department of Agriculture NEPA Policies and Procedures under 7 CFR part 1b. ARS conducts and supports research as authorized by legislation to support one of the USDA goals of assuring adequate supplies of high quality food and fiber. Information generated through such research often forms the basic data needed to assess the impact of a new technology upon the environment. Large scale projects simulating commercial practices are normally implemented in cooperation with other agencies of the Federal or State Governments.
126918715.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE 

COMPANY (U.S.), INC. 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 3:20-cv-05479-MCR-EMT 

BAY COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM, 

LLC d/b/a BAY MEDICAL CENTER 

SACRED HEART HEALTH SYSTEM, 

 

 Defendant. 

 / 

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.), Inc., 

and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bay County Health System, LLC d/b/a Bay 

Medical Center Sacred Heart Health System, hereby notify the Court pursuant to 

Local Rule 16.2 that they have reached an agreement in principle to settle all 

claims and counterclaims in this matter. The parties request 30-days in which to 

finalize their settlement agreement and to file the appropriate dismissal documents. 

Dated: August 11, 2021 

Case 3:20-cv-05479-MCR-EMT Document 34 Filed 08/11/21 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted by: 

Plaintiff, Allied World 

Assurance Company (U.S.), Inc. 

By its Attorneys, 

/s/ Gregory A. Gidus 

Gregory A. Gidus 

Florida Bar No. 105930 

Primary: ggidus@carltonfields.com 

Secondary: dlester@carltonfields.com 

Heidi Hudson Raschke 

Florida Bar No. 61183 

Primary: hraschke@carltonfields.com 

Secondary: pparrey@carltonfields.com

Carlton Fields, P.A.

P.O. Box 3239 

Tampa, FL 33601-3239 

Telephone: (813) 223-7000 

Facsimile: (813) 229-4133 

Defendant, Bay County Health System, 

LLC d/b/a Bay Medical Center Sacred 

Heart Health System 

By its Attorneys, 

/s/ Robert D. Moses

Robert D. Moses 

1801 Centrepark Drive East, Suite 200 

West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

Telephone: 561-697-8088 

Primary: 

eservicewpb@conroysimberg.com 

Secondary: rmoses@conroysimberg.com

Case 3:20-cv-05479-MCR-EMT Document 34 Filed 08/11/21 Page 2 of 2
#### §§ 56.42-56.43 [Reserved]
52.217-4 Evaluation of Options Exercised at

Time of Contract Award.

As prescribed in 17.208(b), insert a provision substantially the same as the following:

Evaluation of Options Exercised at Time of Contract Award (June 1988)

Except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government’s best

interests, the Government will evaluate the total price for the basic requirement together with any

option(s) exercised at the time of award.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.217 [Reserved]
#### § 51.707 Slightly rough texture.

*Slightly rough texture* means that the skin is not smooth or fairly smooth but is not excessively rough or excessively thick, or materially ridged, grooved or wrinkled.
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04 331A0 48
#### § 58.332 Segregation of raw material.

The milk and cream received at the dairy plant shall meet the quality specifications as indicated under § 58.322. The milk and cream should be segregated by quality and processed separately in such a manner that the finished product will fully meet the requirements of a particular U.S. Grade or other specification, whichever is applicable.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOSEPH FRANCIS MASTERSON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 109

[ November 4, 2021 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Mark T. Eissey , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 502019MM003970AXXX and 502019AP000180AXXX

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Logan T. Mohs, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alex andra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN
, G ERBER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.