alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 51.3067 Serious damage. *Serious damage* means any defect which seriously affects the appearance, or the edible or shipping quality of the individual fruit, or the general appearance of the avocados in the container. Any one of the following defects, or any combination of defects the seriousness of which exceeds the maximum allowed for any one defect, shall be considered as serious damage: ( a ) Anthracnose when any spot exceeds the area of a circle one-fourth inch in diameter, or when more than 3 spots each of which exceeds the area of a circle three-sixteenths inch in diameter;
( b ) Cuts or other skin breaks when not healed and penetrating into the flesh of the fruit, or the aggregate area exceeds that of a rectangle 1 inch in length and one-fourth inch in width, or when healed and the appearance is seriously affected;
( c ) Pulled stems when the skin surrounding the exposed stem cavity is torn more than an aggregate area of a circle one-fourth inch in diameter, or when the flesh is torn;
( d ) Russeting or similar discoloration when the appearance of the avocado is affected to a greater extent than that of an avocado which has light brown surface discoloration aggregating 25 percent of the fruit surface;
( e ) Scars or scab when the appearance of the avocado is affected to a greater extent than that of an avocado which has light brown superficial fairly smooth scars aggregating 25 percent of the fruit surface;
( f ) Sunburn when the appearance of the avocado is affected to a greater extent than that of an avocado which has greenish-yellow colored sunburn aggregating 25 percent of the fruit surface;
( g ) Sunscald or sprayburn when not well healed, or when soft, or when the appearance of the avocado is affected to a greater extent than that of an avocado which has light brown superficial, fairly smooth scars aggregating 25 percent of the fruit surface; and
( h ) Cercospora spot when any spot exceeds the area of a circle one-fourth inch in diameter, or when more than 3 spots each of which exceeds the area of a circle three-sixteenths inch in diameter, or when the aggregate area of all spots exceeds the area of a circle 1 inch in diameter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          50,976
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  314,488
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,244,945
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,619,129
<PP&E>                                       1,828,682
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,277,212)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,232,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,586,491
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,185
<OTHER-SE>                                     859,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,232,053
<SALES>                                         25,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,857
<CGS>                                           21,886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,886
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               224,506
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,924
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (238,843)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (238,943)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (238,943)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)


</TABLE>
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

99–011 2002

107th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 107–268

A REPORT CONSISTENT WITH THE WAR POWERS RESOLUTION REGARDING THE ACTION IN COTE D’IVOIRE

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

A REPORT AS PART OF HIS EFFORTS TO KEEP THE CONGRESS 

FULLY INFORMED, CONSISTENT WITH THE WAR POWERS RESOLUTION REGARDING THE ACTION IN COTE D’IVOIRE

SEPTEMBER 30, 2002.—Referred to the Committee on International 

Relations and ordered to be printed 


E:\Seals\Congress.#13
(1)

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 26, 2002. 

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: On September 19, 2002, a mutiny and rebellion took place in the West African country of Cote d’Ivoire that 

threatened American citizens living there. Fighting erupted between the mutineers and government forces. 

On September 24, 2002, a standby evacuation force of U.S. military personnel from the U.S. European Command was pre-positioned in Accra, Ghana, to assist with the evacuation of U.S. citizens from Cote d’Ivoire and with any other contingencies that 

might emerge. These forces initially included approximately 180 

soldiers, fixed-wing aircraft, and equipment. 

On September 25, 2002, U.S. forces moved into Cote d’Ivoire to 

assist French forces with the evacuation of American citizens and 

third country nationals from Bouake. This included children from 

the International Christian Academy as well as Peace Corps Volunteers, faculty, and missionaries. United States forces will also assist in the evacuation of other American citizens and third country 

nationals in Cote d’Ivoire, should their evacuation become necessary. 

Although U.S. forces are equipped for combat, this movement 

was undertaken solely for the purpose of protecting American citizens and property. United States forces will redeploy as soon as it 

is determined that this mission is completed. 

I have taken this action pursuant to my constitutional authority 

to conduct U.S. foreign relations and as Commander in Chief and 

Chief Executive. I am providing this report as part of my efforts 

to keep the Congress informed, consistent with the War Powers 

Resolution. 

I appreciate the support of the Congress in this action in Cote 

d’Ivoire. 

Sincerely, 

GEORGE W. BUSH.

Æ
EXHIBIT32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES
CODE








I, Julie
M. DeMatteo, the President and Chief Executive Officer of UBS Managed Fund
Services Inc., the Sponsor of UBS Managed Futures LLC (Aspect Series) (the
“Series”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of the Series on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Series.











Date:  March 19,
2008


/s/Julie M.
      DeMatteo
              Julie
      M. DeMatteo
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
32.412 Contract clause.       (a) 						            The contracting officer	shall insert the clause at 52.232-12, Advance Payments, in solicitations and contracts	under which the Government will provide advance payments, except as provided	in 32.412(b).                                          (b) 						            If the agency desires to waive the countersignature requirement because of the contractor’s financial strength, good performance record, and favorable experience concerning cost disallowances, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its Alternate I.                                          (c) 						            If a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its AlternateII.                                          (d) 						            If the agency considers a more rapid liquidation appropriate, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its AlternateIII.                                          (e) 						            If the agency provides advance payments under the contract at no interest to the prime contractor, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its AlternateIV.                                          (f) 						            If the requirement for a special account is eliminated in accordance with 32.409-3(e) or (g), the contracting officer shall insert in the solicitation or contract the clause set forth in Alternate V of 52.232-12, Advance Payments, instead of the basic clause.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 32.4 - Advance Payments for Other Than Commercial Acquisitions
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### §§ 4290.3001-4290.3002 [Reserved]
ALASKA SEAFOOD C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 2013

- 0652

DCN: 00 30 3 CBI

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

.
#### § 51.3054 Unclassified.

“Unclassified” consists of avocados which have not been classified in accordance with any of the foregoing grades. The term “unclassified” is not a grade within the meaning of these standards, but is provided as a designation to show that no grade has been applied to the lot.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEY BRAND ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,

a Delaware corporation,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DANCAP PRODUCTIONS, INC., an

Ontario corporation,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-56871

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-02416-AHM-E

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

A. Howard Matz, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 4, 2010

Pasadena, California

Before: RYMER, WARDLAW and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Dancap Productions, Inc. (“Dancap”) appeals the district court’s order

granting Key Brand Entertainment, Inc.’s (“Key Brand”) petition to compel

FILED

MAR 10 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

arbitration. The district court exercised jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and

we have jurisdiction under 9 U.S.C. § 16 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

The district court did not err in concluding that the arbitration provision in

the Additional Rights Agreement encompasses Key Brand’s request for an

interpretation of the parties’ agreements. See Balen v. Holland Am. Line Inc., 583

F.3d 647, 652 (9th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). The parties’ dispute as to the

proper interpretation of the agreements falls squarely within the arbitration

provision, which covers of “[a]ny dispute . . . arising out of or relating to” the

agreement, “including, but not limited to, the interpretation . . . thereof.” Because

the arbitration provision expressly covers disputes as to the interpretation of the

agreement, the provision’s exclusion of “claims for injunctive or equitable relief”

does not apply. Therefore, the district court acted properly in ordering arbitration

pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act. See 9 U.S.C. § 4; Chiron Corp. v. Ortho

Diagnostic Sys., Inc., 207 F.3d 1126, 1130–31 (9th Cir. 2000).

AFFIRMED.
```

[House Report 107-739]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-739

======================================================================

 
   PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 122, MAKING 
       FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2003

                                _______
                                

  October 10, 2002.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 580]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 580, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of House Joint 
Resolution 122, making further continuing appropriations for 
the fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes, under a closed 
rule. The rule provides one hour of debate in the House equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Appropriations.
    The rule waives all points of order against consideration 
of the joint resolution. Finally, the rule provides one motion 
to recommit.

                                

```
#### In the Matter of Andrew R. Davis, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 5, 1979, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, for reasons expressed by Egeth, J., at Special Term. Concur —Birns, J. P., Sandler, Ross, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.
31.205-37 Royalties and other costs for use

of patents.

(a) Royalties on a patent or amortization of the cost of purchasing a patent or patent rights

necessary for the proper performance of the contract and applicable to contract products or

processes are allowable unless-

(1) The Government has a license or the right to a free use of the patent;

(2) The patent has been adjudicated to be invalid, or has been administratively determined to be

invalid;

(3) The patent is considered to be unenforceable; or

(4) The patent is expired.

(b) Care should be exercised in determining reasonableness when the royalties may have been

arrived at as a result of less-than-arm’s-length bargaining; e.g.,royalties-

(1) Paid to persons, including corporations, affiliated with the contractor;

(2) Paid to unaffiliated parties, including corporations, under an agreement entered into in

contemplation that a Government contract would be awarded; or

(3) Paid under an agreement entered into after the contract award.

(c) In any case involving a patent formerly owned by the contractor, the royalty amount allowed

should not exceed the cost which would have been allowed had the contractor retained title.

(d) See 31.109 regarding advance agreements.

Parent topic: 31.205 Selected costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Ronzelli, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, so as to reverse and vacate the judgment of conviction of assault in the second degree under the fourth count of the indictment *(People*v. *English,*16 N Y 2d 719; *People*v. *Lo Verde,*7 N Y 2d 114), the count dismissed, and the judgment as so modified is otherwise affirmed. We conclude no prejudicial error resulted from the testimony of a prior photograph identification. Prior to such testimony the complaining witness testified to the occurrence, described her assailant and his attire, and had directly identified the defendant as that assailant. The trial court initially denied defendant’s motion for a mistrial based on the witness’ statement, after which the jury was excused, and the court heard argument of counsel on the issue. Subsequently the court, in the absence of the jury, struck the testimony from the record and when the jury was brought in they were instructed to disregard such testimony. The subject was not pursued further thereafter by anyone. Under the circumstances and in the context in which the statement appears, we conclude that no prejudice resulted. Concur '—Breitel, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2016195EN.01008301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 20.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 195/83 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1019/2013 of 23 October 2013 amending Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 as regards histamines in fishery products

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 282 of 24 October 2013](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2013_282_R_TOC)
)

On page 47, in the Annex amending Chapter 1 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005, point 2 amending row 1.27a:

for:

| | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘1.27a | Fish sauce produced by fermentation of fishery products | | Histamine | 1 | 400 mg/kg | HPLC (19) | Products placed on the market during their shelf-life’ | |

read:

| | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘1.27a | Fish sauce produced by fermentation of fishery products | | Histamine | 1 | 0 | 400 mg/kg | HPLC (19) | Products placed on the market during their shelf-life’ |

---
```

EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Eldorado  Artesian  Springs,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-KSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Cathleen Shoenfeld, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 USC SS. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to SS. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Cathleen Shoenfeld
----------------------
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 18, 2005
```
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000496

31-JUL-2015

08:01 AM
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### §§ 4290.3021-4290.3024 [Reserved]
# 32.706 Contract clauses.

- 32.706-1 Clauses for contracting in advance of funds. 
- 32.706-2 Clauses for limitation of cost or funds. 
- 32.706-3 Clause for unenforceability of unauthorized obligations. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 32.7 - Contract Funding
#### § 43.103 Purpose and scope.

(a) This subpart contains selected single and double sampling plans for inspection by attributes. They are to serve as a source of plans for developing sound specifications, standards, or sampling and inspection procedures.

(b) The sampling plans of this subpart and corresponding operating characteristic curves are indexed by acceptable quality level, AQL. The AQL's expressed in percent defectives or defects per hundred units are:

| 0.065 | 0.40 | 2.5 | 8.5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0.10 | 0.65 | 4.0 | 10.0 |
| 0.15 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 12.5 |
| 0.25 | 1.5 | 6.5 | 15.0 |
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-71,608]


Xilinx, Inc., Albuquerque, NM; Notice of Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated January 8, 2010, the petitioners requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 
applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The 
determination was issued on December 17, 2009. The Notice of 
Determination will soon be published in the Federal Register.
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that there was no increase in imports or shift/
acquisition to or from abroad by the subject firm of services like or 
directly competitive with the internal engineering services supplied by 
workers of the subject firm.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioners alleged that 
Xilinx, Inc. shifted provision of engineering services to a foreign 
country and provided documentation to support their allegations.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of January, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-3016 Filed 2-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### § 51.1827 Highly colored.

*Highly colored* means that the ground color of each fruit is a deep tangerine color, or characteristic color for the variety, with practically no trace of yellow color.
§ 51.1416 Damage. *Damage* means any specific defect described in this section; or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, or any other defect, or any combination of defects, which materially detracts from the appearance or the edible or marketing quality of the individual pecan or the general appearance of the pecans in the lot. The following defects shall be considered as damage: ( a ) Adhering hull material or dark stains affecting an aggregate of more than 5 percent of the surface of the individual shell;
( b ) Adhering material from inside the shell when firmly attached to more than one-third of the outer surface of the kernel and contrasting in color with the skin of the kernel;
( c ) Broken shells when any portion of the shell is missing;
( d ) Internal flesh discoloration of a medium shade of gray or brown extending more than one-fourth inch lengthwise beneath the center ridge, or any equally objectionable amount in other portions of the kernel; or lesser areas of dark discoloration affecting the appearance to an equal or greater extent;
( e ) Kernels which are dark amber in color;
( f ) Kernels which are not well cured;
( g ) Kernel spots when more than one dark spot is present on either half of the kernel, or when any such spot is more than one-eighth inch in greatest dimension;
( h ) Poorly developed kernels;
( i ) Shriveling when the surface of the kernel is very conspicuously wrinkled; and
( j ) Split or cracked shells when the shell is spread apart or will spread upon application of slight pressure.