alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

     CERTIFICATIONS OF PATRICK A. CUSTER, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
       PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VPGI Corp.
 (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
 Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, the
 undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S1350,
 as adopted pursuant to S906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
 best of my knowledge:

      1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.


 Date:  May 12, 2006           /s/ PATRICK A. CUSTER
                               -------------------------------
                               Patrick A. Custer
                               Chief Executive Officer
                               and Principal Financial Officer


 The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form
 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as
 part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any
 filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
 regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000757595
<NAME> ENSTAR INCOME PROGRAM II-1, L.P.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,426,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  163,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       8,069,500
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,610,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,152,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          166,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,986,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,152,900
<SALES>                                      1,617,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,617,200
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,084,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                590,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            590,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   590,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                      19.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 51.2289 Shell.

*Shell* means the outer shell and/or the woody partition from between the halves of the kernel, and any fragments of either.
From: Lois Starkey [mailto:Lois.Starkey@mfghome.org]

Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 9:27 AM
To: Jensen, Michael Cc: 'Emanuel Levy' Subject: EESI Briefiing



### Good Morning Mike:

Below please find a link to the briefing we participated in last week hosted by the Environmental and Energy Study Institute. I am particularly interested in sharing the presentation by Emanuel Levy, as it succinctly demonstrates the dilemma we face in trying to balance the 2012 IECC standards with affordability.

Emanuel and I I would really like the opportunity to meet with you and your team to discuss this in
further detail.

Let me know if you think this would be helpful.

Best Regards,

Lois



### http://www.eesi.org/sustainable

- and

- affordable

- new

- options

- factory

- built

- housing

- 19

- jan

- 2011

I

Lois Starkey, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite 100, Arlington, VA 22201 Tel: 703

- 558

- 0654 www.manufacturedhousing.org lstarkey@mfghome.org

2011 National Congress & Expo for Manufactured and Modular Housing

A pril 26

- 28, Caesars Palace, Las Vegas Online Registration Now Open at www.congressandexpo.com 2011Legislative Meeting and Winter Conference Washington, DC

- March 13

- 15, 2011 Online Registration Now Open at http://www.manufacturedhousing.org/calendar/Winter_Meeting_form2011.asp 2011 Annual Meeting Phoenix, AZ

- October 2

- 4, 2011

Save the date!
32.801 Definitions.

Designated agency, as used in this subpart, means any department or agency of the executive

branch of the United States Government (see 32.803(d)).

No-setoff commitment, as used in this subpart, means a contractual undertaking that, to the extent

permitted by the Act, payments by the designated agency to the assignee under an assignment of

claims will not be reduced to liquidate the indebtedness of the contractor to the Government.

Parent topic: Subpart 32.8 - Assignment of Claims
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Green Planet Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
  1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 Date:   July 14, 2010By:
/s/ Edmond, L. LonerganName:  Edmond, L. LonerganTitle:  Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Green Planet Group, Inc. and will be retained by Green Planet Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS

          I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


               1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
                    on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
                    covered by this report on Form 10-K of CWABS Asset-Backed
                    Certificates Trust 2006-SPS2 (the "Exchange Act periodic
                    reports");

               2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
                    taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
                    material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
                    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
                    under which such statements were made, not misleading with
                    respect to the period covered by this report;

               3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
                    and other information required to be provided under Form
                    10-D for the period covered by this report is included in
                    the Exchange Act periodic reports;

               4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
                    the servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the
                    compliance review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer
                    compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item
                    1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
                    Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
                    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
                    agreement(s) in all material respects; and

               5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
                    servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
                    related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
                    with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities
                    required to be included in this report in accordance with
                    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18
                    and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
                    report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any
                    material instances of noncompliance described in such
                    reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
          The Bank of New York, as Trustee.

     Date: March 26, 2007


          /s/ Steve Bailey
          -------------------------
          Steve Bailey
          Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Consolidated Capital Properties VI 1998 Second Quarter 10-QSB
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000755908
<NAME> CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998   
<CASH>                                           1,871
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           9,989
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,815   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,354   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          4,375     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,754    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,354    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   887    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   722    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 220    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (55)     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31(a)(1)

NEWSTAR FINANCIAL, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Timothy J.
Conway, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of NewStar Financial, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 7, 2008



/s/ Timothy J. ConwayTimothy J. ConwayChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
#### Young v. The State.

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Tried before the Hon. A-. D. Sayre.

Joe. Calloway, for appellant.

William C. Fitts, Attorney-Genéral, for the State.

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for burglary. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Opinion

Per Curiam.
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

139) ll-E-99 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:08 AM Sheet 139 of 264 
P.2 

•94-5* 

Date sent: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 14:20:13 -0400 

From: MADELEINE STRUM < STRUM.MADELEINE@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV> 

To: mproctor@rtp.pes.com 

subject: information about Classic Motor carriages 

Today I spoke with Frank Echanique, who works with the State of Florida 

Department of Environmental Protection. I asked him whether Classic Motor 

Carriages was still in business (since our survey to the facility was returned to me). 

He informed me that the facility was no longer in business.
# C_2015110EN.01022701.xml

| 31.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/227 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/227

---

Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) for the financial year 2014 — Amending Budget No 2

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 454 of 17 December 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 454 of 17 December 2014

(2015/C 110/49)

After page 71, the following table shall be inserted:

‘Establishment plan

| Function group and grade | Temporary posts |
| --- | --- |
| 2014 | 2013 |
| AD 16 | — | — |
| AD 15 | — | — |
| AD 14 | 1 | 1 |
| AD 13 | — | — |
| AD 12 | — | — |
| AD 11 | 1 | — |
| AD 10 | 4 | 2 |
| AD 9 | 4 | 6 |
| AD 8 | 8 | 5 |
| AD 7 | 9 | 9 |
| AD 6 | 3 | 2 |
| AD 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Total AD | 37 | 32 |
| AST 11 | — | — |
| AST 10 | — | — |
| AST 9 | — | — |
| AST 8 | — | — |
| AST 7 | — | — |
| AST 6 | — | — |
| AST 5 | — | — |
| AST 4 | 2 | 1 |
| AST 3 | 6 | 6 |
| AST 2 | 1 | 1 |
| AST 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Total AST | 14 | 13 |
| | | |
| CA GFIV | 8 | 6 |
| CA GFIII | 8 | 8 |
| CA GFII | 3 | 1 |
| CA GFI | 2 | 2 |
| CA | 21 (1) | 17 |
| SNE | 14 | 15 |
| | | |
| Grand total | 86 | 77 |

Function group and grade

Temporary posts

2014

2013

AD 16

—

—

AD 15

—

—

AD 14

1

1

AD 13

—

—

AD 12

—

—

AD 11

1

—

AD 10

4

2

AD 9

4

6

AD 8

8

5

AD 7

9

9

AD 6

3

2

AD 5

7

7

Total AD

37

32

AST 11

—

—

AST 10

—

—

AST 9

—

—

AST 8

—

—

AST 7

—

—

AST 6

—

—

AST 5

—

—

AST 4

2

1

AST 3

6

6

AST 2

1

1

AST 1

5

5

Total AST

14

13

CA GFIV

8

6

CA GFIII

8

8

CA GFII

3

1

CA GFI

2

2

CA

21 (1)

17

SNE

14

15

Grand total

86

77

---

(1)  This figure does not include the three earmarked contract staff engaged by EASO for the implementation of the 18 months ENP project “Promoting the participation of Jordan in the work of EASO as well as the participation of Tunisia and Morocco in the work of EASO and Frontex” which started in 2014.’

1

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



I, Steven A. Schumm, the Chief Administrative Officer of Enstar Income Program II-2, L.P. (the "Partnership") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

- fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/  Steven A. SchummSteven A. SchummChief Administrative OfficerAugust 14, 2003
#### § 501.16 Penalties and other law.

Whoever shall be found guilty of violating the rules and regulations in this part where the United States has and exercises exclusive or concurrent legislative jurisdiction, is subject to fine of not more than $50 or imprisonment or not more than 30 days, or both (see 40 U.S.C. 318c). Nothing contained in the rules, regulations, or penalties in this part shall be construed as abrogating or authorizing the abrogation of any other rules, regulations, penalties, or any Federal law, or any State and local laws and regulations which may be applicable.
§ 52.26 When appeal inspection may be refused. An application for an appeal inspection may be refused if: ( a ) The reasons for the appeal inspection are frivolous or not substantial;
( b ) The quality or condition of the processed product has undergone a material change since the inspection covering the processed product on which the appeal inspection is requested;
( c ) The lot in question is not, or cannot be made accessible for the selection of officially drawn samples;
( d ) The lot relative to which appeal inspection is requested cannot be positively identified by the inspector as the lot from which officially drawn samples were previously inspected; or
( e ) There is noncompliance with the regulations in this part. Such applicant shall be notified promptly of the reason for such refusal.
#### § 51.2124 Doubles.

*Doubles* means kernels that developed in shells containing two kernels. One side of a double kernel is flat or concave.
PHHMC Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2006-3

Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest
Distributions to Certificateholders for 2006

Class      Interest            Principal            Realized           Ending
          Distribution            Paid               Losses            Balance

A1          398,610.76          857,044.37            0.00       23,989,173.63
A2          381,334.56          872,621.67            0.00       24,425,191.33
A3           24,521.21                0.00            0.00                0.00
A4          362,525.34          939,737.27            0.00       23,906,480.73
A5          195,115.98          375,894.90            0.00        9,562,592.10
A6                0.00                0.00            0.00        2,319,640.91
A7                0.00                0.00            0.00        2,473,095.86
A8                0.00                0.00            0.00       13,331,647.56
131          74,916.94           11,455.20            0.00        4,634,787.80
B2           13,220.64            2,021.51            0.00          817,903.49
B3            7,051.00            1,078.13            0.00          436,214.87
B4            4,406.88              673.84            0.00          272,634.16
B5            3,525.51              539.08            0.00          218,107.92
B6            2,644.15              404.29            0.00          163,582.32
RI                0.54              100.00            0.00                0.00
RII               0.54              100.00            0.00                0.00
# 22.1906 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.222-55, Minimum Wages for Contractor *Workers* Under Executive Order 14026, in *solicitations* and contracts that include the clause at 52.222-6, *Construction* Wage Rate Requirements, or 52.222-41, *Service Contract* Labor Standards, where work is to be performed, in whole or in part, in the *United States*.          

**Parent topic:**Subpart 22.19 - Increasing the Minimum Wage for Contractors
# 37.111 Extension of services.

Award of contracts for recurring and continuing service requirements are often delayed due to circumstances beyond the control of *contracting offices*. Examples of circumstances causing such delays are bid protests and alleged mistakes in bid. In order to avoid negotiation of short extensions to existing contracts, the *contracting officer**may* include an *option* clause (see 17.208(f)) in *solicitations* and contracts which will enable the Government to require continued performance of any services within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract. However, these rates *may* be adjusted only as a result of revisions to prevailing labor rates provided by the Secretary of Labor. The *option* provision *may* be exercised more than once, but the total extension of performance thereunder *shall* not exceed 6 months.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 37.1 - Service Contracts-General
#### COPELAND et al. v. STAPLES et al.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 11, 1912.)

No. 45.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District .of Connecticut; James P. Platt, Judge. This cause comes here upon appeal from a decree dismissing a bill in equity Complainant Grace Fones Copeland on August 14, 1908, executed a conveyance of personal property, which had come to her from her father’s estate, to Staples, as trustee, for certain purposes therein set forth; the object of the conveyance being to safeguard the property for herself and her daughter, and prevent her husband, who had deserted her and was living with another woman, from pressing any claim to such property, or any part of it, in the event of her death. This suit was brought to set aside the conveyance, or, in the alternative, for reformation thereof by inserting a clause of revocation. The opinion of the Circuit Court is found in 189 Fed. 250.

Alva Collins, of New York City (Gilbert B. Roe, of New York City, and Ormond Rambo, of Phila-

delphia, Pa., of counsel), for appellants.

J. S. Pullman, of Bridgeport, Conn., for appellees.

Before LACOMBE, GOXE, and WARD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We fully concur with Judge Platt’s reasoning and conclusion, and think it unnecessary to add anything to his clear discussion of the facts and law of the case. The decree is affirmed, with costs.