alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, James C. Robison, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Animal Health International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release No. 34-47986];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:

(a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                                                      |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ James C. Robison James C. Robison Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

September 18, 2007
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.3040 Financial Assistance for RBICs.

Subpart J, Financial Assistance for RBICs (Leveraged), of this part does not apply to Non-leveraged RBICs.
#### §§ 4280.318-4280.319 [Reserved]
#### § 5001.518 [Reserved]
EX-10.1






United States Department of the Treasury

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20220




May 8, 2009




Ladies and Gentlemen:



Reference is made to that certain letter agreement (the “Repurchase Letter Agreement”) dated
as of the date set forth on Schedule A hereto, between the United States Department of the Treasury
(the “Investor”) and the company set forth on Schedule A hereto (the “Company”). Capitalized terms
used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Repurchase Letter
Agreement.



As documented by the Repurchase Letter Agreement, the Company has completed the repurchase
from the Investor of all of the Preferred Shares issued to the Investor pursuant to the Securities
Purchase Agreement. Following such time, the Company delivered a Warrant Repurchase Notice dated
as of the date set forth on Schedule A hereto to the Investor. In connection with the
consummation, on the date hereof, of the repurchase of the Warrant by the Company from the
Investor, as contemplated by the Warrant Repurchase Notice and Section 4.9 of the Securities
Purchase Agreement:




(a) The Company hereby acknowledges receipt from the Investor of the Warrant; and




(b) The Investor hereby acknowledges receipt from the Company of a wire transfer to the
account of the Investor set forth on Schedule A hereto in immediately available funds of the
aggregate purchase price set forth on Schedule A hereto, representing payment in full for
the Warrant, determined in accordance with Section 4.9 of the Securities Purchase Agreement.



This letter agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the federal law of
the United States if and to the extent such law is applicable, and otherwise in accordance with the
laws of the State of New York applicable to contracts made and to be performed entirely within such
State.



This letter agreement may be executed in any number of separate counterparts, each such
counterpart being deemed to be an original instrument, and all such counterparts will together
constitute the same agreement. Executed signature pages to this letter agreement may be delivered
by facsimile and such facsimiles will be deemed sufficient as if actual signature pages had been
delivered.



1



In witness whereof, the parties have duly executed this letter agreement as of the
date first written above.




United States Department of the Treasury




By: /s/ Duane D. Morse       

Name: Duane Morse

Title: Chief Risk and Compliance Officer





Old National Bancorp




By: /s/ Robert G. Jones       

Name: Robert G. Jones

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer





2
Exhibit 32
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  November 9, 2009
    /s/ Kevin CummingsKevin CummingsPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) Date:  November 9, 2009
    /s/ Thomas F. Splaine, Jr.Thomas F. Splaine, Jr.Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### § 4280.306 Forms, regulations, and instructions.

Copies of all forms, regulations, and instructions referenced in this subpart are available in any Agency office, the Agency's website at: *https://www.rd.usda.gov/page/regulations-and-guidance/* and for grants on the internet at *www.grants.gov*.
#### YEOMAN, Appellant, v. McCLENAHAN et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Action by Hildo C. Yeoman against William McClenahan and others.

No opinion. Judgment reversed on the law and facts, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the authority of Henken v. Schwicker, 174 N. Y. 298, 66 N. E. 971.
Decade Radiation Test Facility

The Defense Threat Reduction Agency has installed a new simulator, the Decade-Quad,

in the Decade Radiation Test Facility (DRTF). The DRTF is nation's premier radiation test

facility for assessing the survivability and operability of critical military systems against

an intense flash of x-rays from a nuclear weapon in space. The facility is the most

advanced x-ray, or ionizing, radiation simulation technology available to test space and

missile systems and their components. It improves the Department of Defense's ability

to maintain confidence in its military systems.

The approximately $100 million facility is a collection of systems that provide multiple

environments which simulate some of the effects generated by nuclear weapons in

space. The Decade-Quad, the facility's largest simulator, can test entire satellites or

operating electronic ensembles such as satellite surveillance, communications and

missile navigation subsystems. Missile and space system developers will also be able to

evaluate radiation effects on components or individual parts using other DRTF

simulators.

Test items are exposed to a short pulse of intense x-ray radiation during each simulator

shot. The simulator stores large amounts of energy over a few minutes and then quickly

releases the energy to expose test objects to short x-ray pulses for several billionths of a

second. Test data is available about 20 minutes after each shot.

The DRTF provides a high intensity dual mode (hot x-rays now, cold x-rays next year)

radiation simulator and a low intensity, high fidelity radiation simulator for component

and small circuit testing. The test facility, designed for the customer, has a low-noise

data acquisition system, and the ability to test classified systems in a secure

environment.

The DRTF is located at Arnold Engineering Development Center, Arnold Air Force Base,

Tenn. An environmental assessment of the DRTF has determined there will be no

significant environmental effects.

DTRA deters the use of weapons of mass destruction, reduces the present threat to the

United States and its friends, and prepares for future threats. This Department of

Defense combat support agency is located in the ashington, D.C., area and operates

field offices worldwide.

Current as of February 2000

Back to News & Information Factsheets

Decade Radiation Test Facility - Factsheet Page 1 of 1

http://web.archive.org/web/20011201060640/http:/www.dtra.mil/news/fact/nw_drtf.html 9/19/2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 3:20-cr-58-MCR

DYLAN ZENAS COWLES

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. 

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 5 of the third superseding 

indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning 

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined the guilty plea was knowing 

and voluntary and the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact 

containing each of the essential elements thereof. I therefore recommend the plea 

of guilty be accepted and the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence 

imposed accordingly.

Dated: June 22, 2021.

/s/ Hope Thai Cannon HOPE THAI CANNON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
3:20-cr-58-MCR

Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed 

within twenty-four (24) hours of the date of this report and recommendation. 

Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the 

court’s internal use only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be 

served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object 

to a magistrate judge's findings or recommendations contained in a report and 

recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 

waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on 

unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir. Rule 

3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.
§ 356.7 Petition for remission or mitigation of forfeiture. ( a ) Any person who has an interest in any property specified in § 356.1 and valued at $10,000 or less, or any person who has incurred or is alleged to have incurred a forfeiture of any such property, may file with the Deputy Administrator a petition for remission or mitigation of forfeiture while the property is in the custody of the Deputy Administrator.
( b ) A petition filed with the Deputy Administrator need not be in any particular form, but must contain the following: ( 1 ) A description of the property:
( 2 ) The time, date, and place of seizure;
( 3 ) Evidence of the petitioner's interest in the property such as contracts, bills of sale, invoices, security interests, certificates of title; and
( 4 ) A statement of all facts and circumstances relied upon by the petitioners to justify remission or mitigation of the forfeiture.
( c ) The petition shall be signed by the petitioner or the petitioner's attorney at law. If the petitioner is a business, the petition must be signed by a partner, officer, or petitioner's attorney at law.
( d ) Upon receiving the petition, the Deputy Administrator shall decide whether or not to grant relief. In making a decision, the Deputy Administrator shall consider the information submitted by the petitioner, as well as any other available information relating to the matter, and may require that testimony be taken concerning the petition.
( e ) If the Deputy Administrator finds that the forfeiture was incurred without willful negligence or without any intention on the part of the petitioner to violate the law or finds the existence of such mitigating circumstances as to justify remission or mitigation of the forfeiture or alleged forfeiture, the Deputy Administrator may remit or mitigate the same upon terms and conditions as he deems reasonable and just. However, remission or mitigation will not be made if such action would frustrate the purposes of the Act or Convention. As an example, this section does not allow remission or mitigation with respect to terrestrial plants that are without documentation required under 50 CFR chapter I.
( f ) The Deputy Administrator shall notify the petitioner in writing concerning whether the petition was granted or denied, and shall state the reasons therefor. If the petition is denied fully or in part, the petitioner may then file a supplemental petition, but no supplemental petition shall be considered unless it is received within 60 days from the date of the Deputy Administrator's notification concerning the original petition. The Deputy Administrator shall notify the petitioner in writing concerning the action taken in response to the supplemental petition, and shall state the reasons therefor.
(Information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Budget and Management under control number 0579-0076)
#### § 412.5 Appeals.

Any person whose request under § 412.4 is denied shall have the right to appeal such denial. This appeal shall be submitted in accordance with 7 CFR 1.13 and addressed to the Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, United States Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0807, room 6618-S, Washington, DC 20250-0807.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29616]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change of the Interagency Autism 
Coordinating Committee (IACC) Subcommittee on Safety meeting on 
November 29, 2010, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., at the Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Conference Room B1/B2, Rockville, MD 20852, which 
was published in the Federal Register on November 10, 2010, 75 FR 
69091.
    The meeting will be a teleconference with no in-person meeting as 
originally advertised. The conference call will be open to the public 
and accessible through a conference call phone number. The call will be 
held from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. The call is subject to change and could 
end earlier.

    Dated: November 18, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-29616 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Hassan Ford, Jr., :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 583 C.D. 2019

:

Pennsylvania Board of Probation and :

Parole, :

Respondent :

CORRECTING ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of February, 2020, in the opinion in the 

above-captioned matter, filed on February 18, 2020, page 1, paragraph 2, line 4, is

corrected to read as follows:

“He was sentenced to incarceration for a term of one 

year, ...”

 _____________________________________

 MARY HANNAH LEAVITT, President Judge
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2428 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Automated 

Defibrillation in Adam’s Memory Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16 (legislative day, MARCH 15), 2006 

Mr. FEINGOLD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the 

Automated Defibrillation in Adam’s Memory Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Automated 

5 Defibrillation in Adam’s Memory Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT. 

7 Section 312(e) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 244(e)) is amended in the first sentence by striking 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 2428 IS

1 ‘‘fiscal year 2003’’ and all the follows through ‘‘2006’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘for each of fiscal years 2003 through 2010’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
# 3.104 Procurement integrity.

- 3.104-1 Definitions. 
- 3.104-2 General. 
- 3.104-3 Statutory and related prohibitions, restrictions, and requirements. 
- 3.104-4 Disclosure, protection, and marking of contractor bid or proposal information and source selection information. 
- 3.104-5 Disqualification. 
- 3.104-6 Ethics advisory opinions regarding prohibitions on a former official’s acceptance of compensation from a contractor. 
- 3.104-7 Violations or possible violations. 
- 3.104-8 Criminal and civil penalties, and further administrative remedies. 
- 3.104-9 Contract clauses. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 3.1 - Safeguards
#### §§ 4280.51-4280.52 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 v. Case No.: 5:00cr21-SPM

VINCENT SMITH,

Defendant.

 / 

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge's Report

and Recommendation (doc. 253) . The parties have been furnished a copy and have

been afforded an opportunity to file objections. No objections have been filed to

date.

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have determined

that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED

AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 253) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (doc. 245) is

hereby denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this tenth day of December, 2007.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 5:00-cr-00021-MW-GRJ Document 259 Filed 12/10/07 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Penny Arcade, Inc., Respondent, v Town Board of the Town of Oyster Bay, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the appellant dated October 12, 1978, which denied petitioner’s application for a special permit, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 20,1979, which, *inter alia,*directed the issuance of the special permit subject to such reasonable conditions as the appellant might impose. Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, determination denying petitioner’s application reinstated and proceeding dismissed. Although a special exception or a special use provided for in a zoning ordinance is tantamount to a legislative finding that the specified use is in harmony with the general zoning plan and will not adversely affect the neighborhood *(Matter of North Shore Steak House v Board of Appeals of Inc. Vil. of Thomaston,*30 NY2d 238), a record which demonstrates that the use is not desirable under the legislated criteria or at a particular place required that the administrative determination be upheld *(Matter of Pleasant Val. Home Constr. v Van Wagner,*41 NY2d 1028). Here, the shopping center in which petitioner proposes to locate its "Penny Arcade” abuts two public schools, and the *621appellant Town Board of the Town of Oyster Bay had before it the testimony of petitioner’s expert that the use would attract school children. Indeed, in one instance which he investigated, this expert found such a use to "be obnoxious”. Since the town board thus was entitled to find as it did that children would be drawn to the establishment during school hours and that the use was undesirable at the location in issue, Special Term should not have substituted its judgment and annulled the determination. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.1
                             FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                              ENGLOBAL 401(K) PLAN

WHEREAS, ENGlobal Engineering, Inc. (the "Employer") adopted a restatement of
the ENGlobal 401(k) Plan (the "Plan"), effective as of October 1, 2005, and
various subsequent amendments; and

WHEREAS, the Employer has the ability to amend the Plan pursuant to Article 7.1;
and

WHEREAS, the Employer now desires to amend the Plan to make the matching
contribution discretionary.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Employer hereby amends the Plan in the following respects,
effective as set forth below:

1. Effective January 1, 2009, Section 4.1(b) is amended to read as follows:

                  (b)(i) For all Participants who are classified on the payroll
         records of the Employer as "regular employees," a discretionary
         matching contribution equal to a uniform percentage of each such
         Participant's Deferred Compensation, the exact percentage, if any, to
         be determined by the Employer, which amount, if any, shall be deemed an
         Employer Non-Elective Contribution. Except, however, in applying the
         matching percentage determined by the Employer, only salary reductions
         up to 6% of payroll period Compensation shall be considered.

                    (ii) For all Participants except those who are classified
         on the payroll records of the Employer as "regular employees," a
         discretionary matching contribution equal to a uniform percentage of
         each such Participant's Deferred Compensation, the exact percentage, if
         any, to be determined by the Employer, which amount, if any, shall be
         deemed an Employer Non-Elective Contribution. Except, however, in
         applying the matching percentage determined by the Employer, only
         salary reductions up to 6% of payroll period Compensation shall be
         considered.

2. In all other respects, the terms of this Plan are hereby ratified and
confirmed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this Fifth Amendment to be executed
in duplicate counterparts, each of which shall be considered as an original, as
of the date indicated below.


                           ENGLOBAL ENGINEERING, INC.


/s/ Jean B. Whitaker                  By: /s/ William A. Coskey
--------------------                      --------------------------------------
Witness
                                      Title: CEO
                                             -----------------------------------

                                      Date:  December 30, 2008
                                             -----------------------------------