alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            3441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       84
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3525
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              124
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        3636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3760
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   204
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        5
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (305)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (305)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (305)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)
        

</TABLE>
§ 51.2950 U.S. No. 3. “U.S. No. 3” consists of walnuts in shells which are dry, fairly clean, free from splits, and free from damage caused by broken shells, and free from serious damage caused by discoloration, perforated shells, adhering hulls or other means. The kernels are well dried, free from decay, dark discoloration, rancidity, and free from damage caused by mold, shriveling, insects or other means. (See § 51.2954.) ( a ) Kernel color may be specified in connection with this grade in terms of “light amber” or “light” from the USDA Walnut Color Chart or in terms of “red” color. The color classifications in the USDA Walnut Color Chart shall not apply to “red” color. Furthermore, “red” color shall not be mixed with “extra light,” “light,” “light amber,” or “amber” colors. When kernel color is based on the color classifications from the USDA Walnut Color Chart, there is no requirement in this grade for the percentage of walnuts having kernels which are “light amber” or “light.” However, the percentage, by count, of nuts with kernels not darker than “light amber” which are free from grade defects and/or the percentage with kernels not darker than “light” which are free from grade defects, may be specified in accordance with the facts. (See § 51.2954.)
( b ) Size shall be specified in connection with the grade. (See § 51.2952.)
[29 FR 12865, Sept. 12, 1964. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 82 FR 39657, Aug. 22, 2017]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Stoneleigh Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I,
William Tay, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

February 9, 2007


/s/ William Tay, President
------------------------------------
William Tay,
Principal Executive Officer &
Principal Financial Officer
§ 54.1013 When an application may be rejected. ( a ) An application or a request for service may be denied by the design review specialist, with the concurrence of the Deputy Administrator or Chief when: ( 1 ) For administrative reasons such as the non-availability of personnel to perform the service;
( 2 ) The application or request relates to equipment or utensils which are not eligible for service under § 54.1006;
( 3 ) The applicant fails to meet either the application requirements prescribed in this subpart or the conditions for receiving such service;
( 4 ) The equipment or utensil is owned by, or located on the premises of, a person currently denied the benefits of the Act;
( 5 ) The applicant has substantial financial ties to a person who is currently denied the benefits of the Act, or who has been adjudged, in an administrative or judicial proceeding, responsible in any way for a current denial of benefits of the Act to any other person.
( 6 ) The applicant is currently denied services under the Act.
( 7 ) Any fees billed to the applicant are not paid within 30 days; or
( 8 ) The applicant has failed to comply with the Act or this subpart or with the instructions or guidelines issued hereunder.
( b ) The Chief shall provide notice to an applicant whose application is rejected, and shall explain the reason(s) for the rejection. If such notification is made verbally, written confirmation may be provided.
#### § 51.2958 Splits.

*Splits* means walnuts with the seam opened completely around the nut so that the two halves of the shell are held together only by the kernel.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**619/14 CA 13-00593**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

CARING ENTERPRISES, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS HEALTH FORCE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
QBE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (STEVEN E. PEIPER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
BROWN CHIARI LLP, LANCASTER (MICHAEL R. DRUMM OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered January 3, 2013. The judgment, rendered upon a nonjury trial, declared that defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify plaintiff in an underlying action.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of withdrawal of appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on July 9, 2015,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: August 19, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### § 52.777 Ascertaining the rating for the factors which are scored.

The essential variations within each factor which is scored are so described that the value may be ascertained for each factor and expressed numerically. The numerical range within each factor which is scored is inclusive (for example, “18 to 20 points” means 18, 19, or 20 points).
#### § 54.3 Authority.

The Chief is charged with the administration, under the general supervision and direction of the Director, of the regulations and the Act insofar as they relate to products.
Bonita Lee Employment Offer



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 

 
 February 12, 2009 
 Bonita
Lee 
 2112 Walker Lane 
 Fullerton, CA 92833 
 Dear Ms. Lee, 
 It is a pleasure to extend an offer of employment to you for the position of Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer. You will report directly to the President and Chief Executive Officer. 
 Your first day of employment will be March 1, 2009. The following will confirm the terms of your employment with Nara Bank. 
  

	1.	Salary. Your annualized gross salary will be $230,000 ($8,846.15 bi-weekly gross). 

  

	2.	Stock Options. The Bank shall recommend to the Board of Directors that you be provided with an option to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock of Nara Bancorp, Inc. at a
price of $8.64 per share. Such options shall vest over five years at 20% a year on each anniversary day. All other terms relating to the granting of shares is subject to the terms of the Stock Option Plan under which the options are granted.


  

	3.	Singing Bonus. You will be paid a signing bonus of $45,000. 

  

	4.	Long Term Incentive Plan. You will have the opportunity to participate in Nara Bank’s Long Term Incentive Plan. 

  

	5.	Change in Control. You will be eligible for one year’s base salary and accrued bonus, if any, upon a change in control. 

  

	6.	Car allowance. You will be paid a car allowance of $1,150 per month ($530.77 per pay period). 

  

	7.	Benefits. You are eligible to participate in any life insurance, benefits, as well as vacation, sick leave, medical, dental, vision, 401(k), and ESOP, and any other employee
benefits plans normally provided to other executives of the Bank. 

 You understand that as an employee with Nara Bank you will
have access to confidential and proprietary information, which we consider private and protect adamantly. We also resolve any disputes between you and us by arbitration. Therefore, this offer is conditioned on your execution and delivery of an
Arbitration Agreement, which is enclosed with this letter. We are an at-will organization which means either party may terminate the relationship at any time with or without cause and with or without notice. 
 I am delighted to extend this offer to you and look forward to working together. Please indicate your acceptance of this offer by signing one copy of
this letter and Arbitration Agreement. The terms of this offer supersede any prior representations or terms, whether expressed orally or in writing. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Min Kim
	 Min Kim,
 President and Chief Executive
Officer


  

					
	Acceptance:	 		 	
			
	  	 		 	  
	 Bonita Lee
 Attachments: Arbitration Agreement

	 		 	Date
#### § 51.751 U.S. No. 1 Bright.

The requirements for this grade are the same as for U.S. No. 1 except that fruit shall have not more than one-fifth of its surface, in the aggregate, affected by discoloration. For tolerances see § 51.760.
# 37.113 Severance payments to foreign nationals.

- 37.113-1 Waiver of cost allowability limitations. 
- 37.113-2 Solicitation provision and contract clause. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 37.1 - Service Contracts-General
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CLARIBEL A. CORONA, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. )

) 

CITIMORTGAGE, INC; AMY J. CORONA; )

COUNTRY CHASE MASTER ) Case No. 2D16-4943

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.; )

COUNTRY CHASE TOWNHOMES )

PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, ) 

INC.; COUNTRY CHASE RESIDENTIAL ) 

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.; )

ANY AND ALL UNKNOWN PARTIES )

CLAIMING BY, THROUGH, UNDER, )

OR AGAINST THE HEREIN NAMED )

INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT(S) WHO ARE )

NOT KNOWN TO BE DEAD OR ALIVE, )

WHETHER SAID UNKNOWN PARTIES )

MAY CLAIM AN INTEREST AS )

SPOUSES, HEIRS, DEVISEES, )

GRANTEES, OR OTHER CLAIMANTS; )

UNKNOWN TENANT whose name is )

fictitious to account for parties in )

possession, )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed February 14, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

 Hillsborough County; Mark D. Kiser, 

Judge.
- 2 -

 Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, LLC,

 Tampa; and Latasha Scott of Lord Scott,

 PLLC, Tampa, for Appellant.

Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP,

Tallahassee; William P. Heller of 

Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale; and Eric

M. Levine of Akerman LLP, West Palm

Beach, for Appellee CitiMortgage, Inc.

No appearance for remaining Appellees. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, CRENSHAW, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
§ 52.51 Charges for inspection services on a contract basis. ( a ) The Administrator may enter into contracts with applicants to perform continuous inspection services or other types of inspection services pursuant to the regulations in this part and other requirements as prescribed by the Administrator in such contract, and the charges for such inspection service provided in such contracts shall be based on such basis as will reimburse the Agricultural Marketing Service of the Department for the full cost of rendering such inspection service as described in § 52.42.
( b ) The Administrator may enter into a written memorandum of understanding or contract, whichever may be appropriate, with any administrative agency charged with the administration of a marketing agreement or a marketing order effective pursuant to the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.*) for the making of inspections pursuant to said agreement or order on such basis as will reimburse the Agricultural Marketing Service of the Department for the full cost of rendering such inspection service based on the formulas in § 52.42. Likewise, the Administrator may enter into a written memorandum of understanding or contract, whichever may be appropriate, with an administrative agency charged with an administration of a similar program operated pursuant to the laws of any State.
( c ) Charges for year-round in-plant inspection services on a contract basis will be billed to the applicant monthly for all hours worked with a minimum of 40 hours per week for each inspector assigned to perform the inspection services. Charges for work performed in excess of an employee's regular work schedule will be calculated as described in § 52.42(a)(2).
( d ) Charges for less than year-round in-plant inspection services (four or more consecutive 40 hour weeks) on a contract basis will be billed to the applicant monthly for all hours with a minimum of 40 hours for each inspector assigned to perform the inspection services and will be calculated based on the formulas in § 52.42.
( e ) No Member of, or Delegate to Congress, or Resident Commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part of any contract provided for in this section or to any benefit that may arise therefrom, but this provision shall not be construed to extend to such contract if made with a corporation for its general benefit, and shall not extend to any benefits that may accrue from the contract to a Member of, or Delegate to Congress, or a Resident Commissioner in his capacity as a farmer.
[38 FR 25168, Sept. 12, 1973. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, and further redesignated at 54 FR 50732, Dec. 11, 1989] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 52.51, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
EX-33 (h)
(logo) REGULUS

Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria

1.   Pursuant to Subpart 229.1100 - Asset Backed Securities, 17 C.F.R. Section
     229.1100-229.1123 ("Regulation AB"), Regulus Group LLC, for itself and its
     wholly-owned subsidiaries (individually and collectively "Regulus"), is
     responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria
     applicable to the remittance processing services it provides to customers
     who are issuers or servicers of asset backed securities transactions and
     who have requested confirmation of Regulus' compliance in connection with
     loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset
     backed securities transactions (the "Platform"). Remittance processing is a
     service whereby check payments that are remitted by mail to a post office
     box are collected, processed through a highly automated data capture
     system, and prepared for deposit to a bank account held by the beneficiary
     of the payment.

2.   The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB were used
     in Regulus' assessment of compliance. Regulus has concluded that the
     servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of
     Regulation AB are applicable to the servicing activities it performs with
     respect to the Platform (such criteria the "Applicable Servicing
     Criteria"). Regulus has concluded that the remainder of the servicing
     criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the
     activities it performs with respect to the Platform because Regulus does
     not participate in the servicing activities referenced by such servicing
     criteria.

3.   As of and for the year ending December 31, 2006, Regulus has complied in
     all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria set forth in
     Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB.

4.   KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
     report on Regulus' assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
     Criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2006. A copy of that
     attestation report is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

/s/ Kimberlee Clark
Kimberlee Clark
Chief Financial Officer

February 22, 2007



860 LATOUR COURT  NAPA, CA  94558  TEL: 707.254.4000  FAX: 707.254.4070
REGULUSGROUP.COM
###### Editorial Note on Part 57

#### Editorial Note:

1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

#### § 57.20 Inspection in accordance with methods prescribed or approved.

Inspection of eggs shall be rendered pursuant to these regulations and under such conditions and in accordance with such methods as may be prescribed or approved by the Administrator.

[63 FR 69968, 69970, Dec. 17, 1998]
#### § 54.1006 Kind of service.

Certification of Sanitary Design and Fabrication of Equipment Used in the Slaughter, Processing, and Packaging of Livestock and Poultry Products service under the regulations shall consist of the evaluation, certification and/or identification, upon request by the applicant, of the adherence of the design and fabrication of equipment and utensils to sanitary principles and criteria under applicable standards identified in this subpart. Equipment or utensils having an identical design, materials of construction, and fabrication, except for scaling up or down in size, may be submitted for evaluation as a model line or series. Determination as to equipment or utensils compliance with standards for materials of fabrication or method of fabrication may be based upon information received from the fabricator.
#### § 5001.522 Future recovery.

After a final loss claim has been paid, the lender must use reasonable efforts to collect from any party still liable for future recovery unless the Agency notifies the lender otherwise. Any net proceeds from future recovery will be split pro rata between the lender and the Agency based on the percent of the loan guarantee even if the loan note guarantee has been terminated. Once the Agency determines a debt is Federal debt and provides notice to the lender, that Federal debt is excluded from future recovery. The lender must cease all collection efforts against the borrower and any individual or corporate guarantors upon referral of the debts by the Agency for collection in accordance with part 3 of this title. The Agency will not share with the lender any collection of Federal debt made by the Federal Government from any liable party to the guaranteed loan.
#### Annette Werner, Appellant, v. Charles H. Werner, Respondent.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 22, 1965, modified, on the law and the facts, by increasing the amount directed therein to be paid by defendant to plaintiff for support of their child from $25 a week to $40 a week. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, defendant’s income warrants an increase in the amount of support for the infant child. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 5001.453 Issuance of the loan note guarantee. The Agency, at its sole discretion, will determine if the conditions specified in the conditional commitment have been met and whether to issue the loan note guarantee. ( a ) *Issuance.* When the Agency is satisfied that all of the conditions specified in the conditional commitment have been met and it receives all the required fees plus the executed lender's agreement from the lender, the Agency will issue the documents identified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section, as appropriate. ( 1 ) *Loan note guarantee.* The Agency will provide the lender the original loan note guarantee document which the lender must attach to the promissory note. If the lender elected to use the multi-note system, the Agency will issue one loan note guarantee for the set of promissory notes.
( 2 ) *Assignment guarantee agreement.* If the lender assigns any guaranteed portion of a guaranteed loan to a holder, the lender, holder, and the Agency will execute an assignment guarantee agreement for each assignment.
( 3 ) *Certificate of incumbency and signature.* The Agency will provide the holder an executed certificate of incumbency form to verify the signature and title of the Agency official who signed the assignment guarantee agreement.
( b ) *Agency review of closing.* The Agency will review the closing documents submitted by the lender for completeness and if all conditions have been met and all documents have been provided, the Agency will issue the loan note guarantee. If the Agency determines that it cannot issue the loan note guarantee, the Agency will notify the lender, in writing, of the reasons and give the lender a reasonable period within which to satisfy the objections. If the lender satisfies the objections within the time allowed, the Agency will issue the loan note guarantee.
( c ) *Cancellation of obligation.* A lender can submit a written request to the Agency for a partial cancellation. The lender must include in this request the reason for the partial cancellation, the effective date, and the portion to be canceled. If the Agency conditions for issuance of the loan note guarantee are rejected, cannot be met or funds are, in whole or in part, no longer needed, the Agency will cancel the obligation.
[85 FR 42518, July 14, 2020, as amended at 85 FR 62198, Oct. 2, 2020]
# L_2013287EN.01009001.xml

| 29.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 287/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 287/90

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 269 of 10 October 2013, p. 1
  )

Page 7, recital (57), second sentence

for:

"(...). The other provisions should apply from 1 June 2016."

read:

"(...). The other provisions should apply from 1 May 2016."

Page 88, Article 288(2)

for:

"2.   Articles other than those referred to in paragraph 1 shall apply as from 1 June 2016."

read:

"2.   Articles other than those referred to in paragraph 1 shall apply as from 1 May 2016.".

---