alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2305 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to repeal the amendments 

made by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 requiring documentation 

evidencing citizenship or nationality as a condition for receipt of medical 

assistance under the Medicaid program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2006 

Mr. AKAKA (for himself, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. KERRY, and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to repeal 

the amendments made by the Deficit Reduction Act of 

2005 requiring documentation evidencing citizenship or 

nationality as a condition for receipt of medical assistance under the Medicaid program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 2305 IS

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR DOCUMENTA2 TION EVIDENCING CITIZENSHIP OR NATION3 ALITY AS A CONDITION FOR RECEIPT OF 

4 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE UNDER THE MEDICAID 

5 PROGRAM. 

6 (a) REPEAL.—Subsections (i)(22) and (x) of section 

7 1903 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b), as 

8 added by section 6036 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 

9 2005, are each repealed. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

11 (1) Section 1903 of the Social Security Act (42 

12 U.S.C. 1396b) is amended— 

13 (A) in subsection (i)— 

14 (i) in paragraph (20), by adding ‘‘or’’ 

15 after the semicolon at the end; and 

16 (ii) in paragraph (21), by striking ‘‘; 

17 or’’ and inserting a period; 

18 (B) by redesignating subsection (y), as 

19 added by section 6043(b) of the Deficit Reduc20 tion Act of 2005, as subsection (x); and 

21 (C) by redesignating subsection (z), as 

22 added by section 6081(a) of the Deficit Reduc23 tion Act of 2005, as subsection (y). 

24 (2) Subsection (c) of section 6036 of the Deficit 

25 Reduction Act of 2005 is repealed. 
3 

•S 2305 IS

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeals and amend2 ments made by this section shall take effect as if included 

3 in the enactment of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. 

Æ
3.104-8 Criminal and civil penalties, and

further administrative remedies.

Criminal and civil penalties, and administrative remedies, may apply to conduct that violates 41

U.S.C. chapter 21 (see 3.104-3). See 33.102(f) for special rules regarding bid protests. See 3.104-7

for administrative remedies relating to contracts.

(a) An official who knowingly fails to comply with the requirements of 3.104-3 is subject to the

penalties and administrative action set forth in 41 U.S.C. 2105.

(b) An offeror who engages in employment discussion with an official subject to the restrictions of

3.104-3, knowing that the official has not complied with 3.104-3(c)(1), is subject to the criminal,

civil, or administrative penalties set forth in 41 U.S.C. 2105.

(c) An official who refuses to terminate employment discussions (see 3.104-5) may be subject to

agency administrative actions under 5 CFR 2635.604(d) if the official’s disqualification from

participation in a particular procurement interferes substantially with the individual’s ability to

perform assigned duties.

Parent topic: 3.104 Procurement integrity.
46.305 Cost-reimbursement service

contracts.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.246-5, Inspection of Services-Cost

Reimbursement, in solicitations and contracts for services, or supplies that involve the furnishing of

services, when a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated.

Parent topic: Subpart 46.3 - Contract Clauses
52.214-8 [Reserved]

Parent topic: 52.214 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                     4,274,600
<SECURITIES>                                 983,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                 33,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           5,291,500
<PP&E>                                    18,934,400
<DEPRECIATION>                             6,710,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            23,049,200       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        812,900
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                22,188,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              23,049,200
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           2,677,700
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,200,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             121,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,114,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        1,114,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                               1,114,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  20.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  20.99
        

</TABLE>
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection  with the annual report of North  American  Nickel Inc.  (formerly
Widescope Resources Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A Amendment No. 2 for the
period  ending  December  31,  2011 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Richard  J.  Mark,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the  Report  containing  the  financial  statements  of the  Company  fully
     complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2012

/s/ Richard J. Mark
-----------------------------------
Richard J. Mark
Chief Executive Officer

* A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academic AchievementCollege Entrance ExaminationsComparative AnalysisDyslexiaEducational ResearchEducational TrendsElementary Secondary EducationInternational StudiesLiteracyMythologyNational SurveysReading AchievementTrend AnalysisWhole Language Approach

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Identifiers - Location:**

**Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Phillipp Eidenmueller, Appellant, v. Harold W. Follette, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent.

Motion by appellant to amend the remittitur on his appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered May 2, 1963, which judgment was unanimously affirmed by order of this court, dated October 24, 1966. Motion granted. Decision of this court dated October 24, 1966 [26 A D 2d 833], amended by including, as part of the decretal paragraph, a statement to the effect that appellant raised certain constitutional questions on the appeal with respect to his having been denied the protection of the Fourteenth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and section 2 of article I of the New York State Constitution; and the construction of said Constitutions was directly involved; and order, also dated October 24, 1966, amended accordingly. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XUEQIANG XU,

Petitioner,

v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 12

- 73356

Agency No. A089

- 992

- 399

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 24, 2017 **

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Xueqiang Xu, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

Immigration Judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argu ment. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 31 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 12

- 73356

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S .C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th

Cir. 2006). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

We do not consider the materials Xu references in his opening brief that are

not part of the administrative record. See Fisher v. INS , 79 F.3d 955, 963

- 64 (9th

Cir. 1996) (en banc).

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that, even if credible,

Xu’s experiences in China did not rise to the level of persecution. See Nagoulko v.

INS , 333 F.3d 1012, 1016

- 17 (9th Cir. 2003) (record did not co mpel finding of past

persecution where petitioner did not suffer economic deprivation rising to the level

of persecution and did not suffer any significant phys ical harm) ; see also Jiang v.

Holder , 611 F.3d 1086, 109 5 (9th Cir. 2010) ( petitioner “cannot qualify for refugee

status solely on the basis of [his wife’s] forced abortion ”). Substantial evidence

also supports the BIA’s conclusion Xu failed to establish a well

- founded fear of

future persecution. See Gu v. Gonzales , 454 F.3d 1014, 1022 (9th Cir. 2006)

(applicant did not present compelling evidence of a well

- founded fear of future

persecution). Thus, Xu’s asylum claim fails.

In this case, b ecause Xu faile d to establish eligibility for asylum, his

withholding of removal claim fails

. See Zehatye , 453 F.3d at 1190. We lack

jurisdiction to consider Xu’s contentions regarding a pattern and practice of3 12

- 73356

persecution or membership in a disfavored group. See Barr on v. Ashcroft , 358

F.3d 674, 6 78 (9th Cir. 2004) ( petitioner must exhaust claims in administrative

proceedings below).

Finally, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief

because Xu failed to show i t is more likely than not he would be tortured by or

with the consent or acquiescence o f the Chinese government. See Silaya v.

Mukasey , 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part

.
§ 51.1310 Sizing. ( a ) The numerical count, or the minimum size of the pears packed in closed containers shall be indicated on the package. The number of pears in the box shall not vary more than 3 from the number indicated on the box.
( b ) When the numerical count is marked on western standard pear boxes the pears shall not vary more than three-eighths inch in their transverse diameter for counts 120 or less; one-fourth inch for counts 135 to 180, inclusive; and three-sixteenths inch for counts 193 or more.
( c ) When the numerical count is marked on western standard half boxes or special half boxes packed three tiers deep, the pears shall not vary more than three-eighths inch for coutns 75 or less; one-fourth inch for counts 80 to 110, inclusive; and three-sixteenths inch for counts 115 or more.
( d ) When the numerical count is marked on western standard half boxes or special half boxes packed two tiers deep, the pears shall not vary more than three-eighths inch for counts 50 or less; one-fourth inch for counts 55 to 70, inclusive; and three-sixteenths inch for counts 80 or more.
( e ) When the numerical count is not shown, the minimum size shall be plainly stamped, stenciled or otherwise marked on the container in terms of whole inches, whole and half inches, whole and quarter inches, or whole and eighth inches, as 21 ⁄ 2 inches minimum, 21 ⁄ 4 inches minimum, or 25 ⁄ 8 inches minimum, in accordance with the facts. It is suggested that both minimum and maximum sizes be marked on the container, as 21 ⁄ 4 to 23 ⁄ 4 inches, 21 ⁄ 2 to 23 ⁄ 4 inches, as such marking is especially desirable for pears marketed in the export trade.
( f ) “Size” means the greatest transverse diameter of the pear taken at right angles to a line running from the stem to the blossom end.
32.009 Providing accelerated payments to

small business contractors and to prime

contractors that subcontract with a small

business concern.

32.009-1 General.

32.009-2 Contract clause.

Parent topic: Part 32 - Contract Financing
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Mr. TO8 A. crmou Couuty Aadltor 

MoLunu County 

moo, Taxar 

Boar Sir: 

oplnbm no. t&w7 

ShoaldAEu oad 

l dBtWLUW@, to6eth.r With th buildl B, and o ultr r tir u M o Lenuu County, 

Wea. 8. Sal& road ruporiatudut rk811 

bo l graduate olrll rn&noar l x p a r io&nd no ed 

rkillrd in hi&way oonatruotim l md rhall rooalro aa ralary ier hlr aen1o.r the l a ot 

l ot lrrr thau Twenty-fir. Eundrod (#iSOO.Oe) 

Dollar@, aor 8on than 81x Thoumad (#SOOO.OO) 

Dollrrr per annu, payable Coatkly cut of thr. 
gonoral rud 0r Mokaau County aporn 88rmnts 

drun by tha roolrt~ JrrQr, l r o h a lr mn or the 

l oa8lsslonors* oourt er uld eoaaty.’ 

~otioa a 0r the Sproial Road Law er MoLoalmn 

county, supra, 8proiri8dif prorldos tht tb salmy 

or the read superlntendont shsll k paid cot or the 

gazers1 ipad of MOLOIW~ County. Ths ststutes ek e l o 

qmslal provlsloas as to what fund, out of rhiohj th* 

salaries er the 8sslst8ats or ths road superlatandent 

&Ad his &floe l xponso should bo paid. Thoreforo, in 

the absanoo of l q statutory authority, l uthorislng 

th0 py88nt 0r the ulariss l r l 8sistants 0r the read 

superiatmdont and hi8 0r r i00 l rpra808 oat 0r any partiouhr fund the sari should bo paid oat of. thr @Ml-1 

iund 0r the oounty. 

Yo u arm r 08p 00tr l tiidtisod y that it is the 

opiulon l f this kp8rtm8t that the nlarlrs of the road 

mprrintendent af MaLonnm Couatr aad his 8ssfstaats and 

his offloo l xpensos'should k *id out et the dww’al 

rtd 0r Molonnaa county. 

Trustily that tha ?orsgoing minors your lnquiry, m rwaln 

10x-y trilr pars ’ 

ATTOBNBY aBBBALoYTx48 

: _ 

BJ (Signed) Ardall ?illiams 

Ardoll lrilllw 

Asslrtaat 

(Slmed) (krald C. lunn 

ATToBBBTBR4BBAL0?TBEAB
#### § 56.6 Supervision.

All grading service shall be subject to supervision at all times by the responsible State supervisor, regional director and national supervisor. Such service shall be rendered in accordance with instructions issued by the Administrator where the facilities and conditions are satisfactory for the conduct of the service and the requisite graders are available. Whenever the supervisor of a grader has evidence that such grader incorrectly graded a product, such supervisor shall take such action as is necessary to correct the grading and to cause any improper grademarks which appear on the product or the containers thereof to be corrected prior to shipment of the product from the place of initial grading.

[40 FR 20055, May 8, 1975. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 60138, Dec. 26, 1978. Redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 71 FR 42008, July 24, 2006]
#### § 51.2965 Fairly clean.

*Fairly clean* means that, from the viewpoint of general appearance, the lot is not seriously damaged by adhering dirt or other foreign matter, and that individual walnuts are not coated or caked with dirt or foreign matter. Both the amount of surface affected and the color of the dirt shall be taken into consideration.
Case 3:20-cr-00042-MCR Document 47 Filed 01/22/21 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00042-MCR Document 47 Filed 01/22/21 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00042-MCR Document 47 Filed 01/22/21 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00042-MCR Document 47 Filed 01/22/21 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00042-MCR Document 47 Filed 01/22/21 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00042-MCR Document 47 Filed 01/22/21 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00042-MCR Document 47 Filed 01/22/21 Page 7 of 7
#### § 58.414 General construction, repair and installation.

All equipment and utensils necessary to the manufacture of cheese and related products shall meet the same general requirements as outlined in § 58.128. In addition, for certain other equipment the following requirements shall be met.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00535-CV

Gary A. Shepherd and Linda C. Shepherd, Appellants

v.

Wells Fargo Bank N.A., as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loans Trust 2007-4, 

Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-4, and MWS Acquisitions, LLC, Appellees

FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY

NO. 21939, THE HONORABLE JAMES D. SQUIRE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants Gary A. Shepherd and Linda C. Shepherd and appellees Wells Fargo 

Bank N.A., as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loans Trust 2007-4, Asset Backed Certificates, 

Series 2007-4, and MWS Acquisitions, LLC, have filed a joint agreed motion to dismiss this 

appeal because the parties have reached a full settlement of all claims. The parties have agreed 

that costs of the appeal will be paid by the party incurring the costs. See Tex. R. App. 42.1(d).

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id. R. 42.1(a), 43.2(f).

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Kelly, and Smith

Dismissed On Joint Motion

Filed: August 11, 2023
#### § 51.773 Damage.

*Damage* means any specific defect described in § 51.784, Table I; or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which materially detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the fruit.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM RICKY BOYD,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 72 WM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2019, the “Petition for Assumption of 

Jurisdiction” is DENIED.
22.305 Contract clause.       Insert the clause at 52.222-4, Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards-Overtime Compensation, in solicitations and contracts (including, for this purpose, basic ordering agreements) when the contract may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics. However, do not include the clause in solicitations and contracts-                                       (a) Valued at or below $150,000;                                          (b) For commercial products and commercial services;                                          (c) For transportation or the transmission of intelligence;                                          (d) To be performed outside the United States, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Johnston Island, Wake Island, and the outer Continental Shelf as defined in the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C.1331) (29 CFR5.15);                                          (e) ) For work to be done solely in accordance with 41 U.S.C. chapter 65, (see subpart  22.6);                                          (f) For supplies that include incidental services that do not require substantial employment of laborers or mechanics; or                                          (g) Exempt under regulations of the Secretary of Labor (29 CFR5.15).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 22.3 - Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JEFFREY P. DATTO,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-531-AW-MAF

THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND JOHN 

DOES 1-5,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

I have considered the magistrate judge’s March 5, 2021 Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 7, to which there has been no objection. I agree with the 

magistrate judge that the case should be dismissed for several independent reasons. 

There has been no timely service. See Rule 4(m). Plaintiff has failed to prosecute the 

case, which appears abandoned. And Plaintiff has not complied with a court order. 

Any one of these reasons is alone a basis to dismiss without prejudice.

The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 7) is adopted and incorporated 

into this order. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed 

without prejudice for (i) failure to effect service, (ii) failure to prosecute and (iii) 

failure to comply with a court order.” The clerk will then close the file.

Case 4:20-cv-00531-AW-MAF Document 8 Filed 04/09/21 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED on April 9, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00531-AW-MAF Document 8 Filed 04/09/21 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:20-cr-00042-AW-MAF Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:20-cr-00042-AW-MAF Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:20-cr-00042-AW-MAF Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 3 of 3
###### Editorial Note on Part 5

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 62 FR 8361, Feb. 25, 1997.

#### § 5.3 Selection of calendar year price data.

In computing the adjusted base price for those commodities for which calendar year price data are used, “* * * the average of the prices received by farmers for such commodity, at such times as the Secretary may select during each year * * *,” as used in section 301(a)(1)(B)(i), shall be the simple average of the 12 monthly estimates of the prices received by farmers as published by the National Agricultural Statistics Service in “Agricultural Prices” for those commodities for which such prices are available. An allowance for unredeemed loans and purchase agreement deliveries, any supplemental payments resulting from price support operations, and the value of marketing certificates, such as those received by producers of wheat pursuant to the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, and others of generally similar character and effect, shall be added to the price specified above. Prices received for milk wholesale, milkfat, beef cattle, sheep, and lambs shall include wartime subsidy payments as provided by section 301(a)(1)(B). For Maryland Tobacco, type 32, the price data for each calendar year shall be the weighted average price of type 32 tobacco sold during the period January 1-December 31.

[Amdt. 14, 29 FR 12451, Sept. 1, 1964]