alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Jeffrey A. Leddy, Chief Executive Officer and President of SkyTerra
Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
          June 30 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
          the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                             By:  /s/ JEFFREY A. LEDDY
                                  ----------------------------------
                                  Name:   Jeffrey A. Leddy
                                  Title:  Chief Executive Officer and President
                                          (Principal Executive Officer and
                                            Principal Financial Officer)
                                  Date:   November 10, 2005


     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-3585

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa Christopher Robin Schmidt, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 3, 2004 Filed: July 6, 2004

___________ Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Christopher Robin Schmidt appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the Northern District of Iowa upon revocation of his supervised release. The district court sentenced Schmidt to 10 months imprisonment followed by supervised release through the date imposed in the original judgment, and ordered Schmidt’s placement at a community corrections center (CCC) for 6 months as a condition of supervised release. For reversal Schmidt argues the district court did not-2- have the authority to order his placement in a CCC following his release from prison. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We review the sentence for plain error because Schmidt raised no objection at sentencing. See United States v. Morey , 120 F.3d 142, 143 (8th Cir. 1997) (per curiam). We conclude that the district court properly exercised its discretion in ordering Schmidt’s placement in a CCC as a condition of supervised release. See United States v. Griner , 358 F.3d 979, 981-82 (8th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alliance Financial Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack H. Webb,
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of Alliance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Alliance.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 14, 2011



/s/ Jack H.
WebbJack H. WebbChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Susan H. Black, United States Senior Circuit Judge for **

the Eleventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CAMERON SHAWAYNE SMITH,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-30219

D.C. No. 1:10-cr-00062-JDS-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Jack D. Shanstrom, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 7, 2012

Seattle, Washington

Before: GRABER, RAWLINSON, and BLACK**, Circuit Judges. 

Appellant Cameron Shawayne Smith challenges his sentence. We have

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm the district court.

FILED

AUG 10 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

The district court did not commit clear error in concluding that Smith

possessed a firearm during the commission of his drug trafficking offense and

applying an enhancement pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines §

2D1.1(b)(1), where the firearm was in his apartment where drugs were found. See

United States v. Restrepo, 884 F.2d 1294, 1296 (9th Cir. 1989); see also United

States v. Lopez-Sandoval, 146 F.3d 712, 716 (9th Cir. 1998) (holding that unloaded

firearms qualify for this enhancement).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in holding that Smith was

ineligible for safety valve relief where the district court found that Smith failed to

disclose buyers, suppliers, and general facts about the chain of distribution. See 18

U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5); see also United States v. Mejia-Pimental, 477 F.3d 1100,

1105 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[A] defendant satisfies his ‘good faith’ obligation by

providing the Government with truthful, complete information . . .”); United States

v. Shrestha, 86 F.3d 935, 939 (9th Cir. 1996) (noting that the good faith

requirement includes “provid[ing] information concerning co-conspirators”)

(citation omitted).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Smith was

ineligible for the two-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility where the

district court found that Smith did not admit to all conduct comprising the offense,
3

including the drug amount, his role, and his possession of the firearm. See

U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, cmt. n.1.

Smith’s sentence was not substantively unreasonable because the district

court considered arguments of counsel and the § 3553(a) factors, and sentenced

Smith at the low end of the guideline range. See United States v. Ressam, 679 F.3d

1069, 1089 (9th Cir. 2012), as amended (en banc) (“In determining substantive

reasonableness, we are to consider the totality of the circumstances . . .”) (citation

omitted).

AFFIRMED.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Adult EducationAdult LiteracyBasic SkillsElementary Secondary EducationEnglish (Second Language)Instructional MaterialsLanguage SkillsLearning DisabilitiesNewspapers

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### § 503.5 Nuisances.

The use of loud, abusive or otherwise improper language, unwarranted loitering, sleeping or assembly, the creation of any hazard to persons or things, improper disposal of rubbish, spitting, prurient prying, or the commission of any obscene or indecent act in or on the PIADC is prohibited.
11.106 Purchase descriptions for service

contracts.

In drafting purchase descriptions for service contracts, agency requiring activities shall ensure that

inherently governmental functions (see subpart 7.5) are not assigned to a contractor. These

purchase descriptions shall-

(a) Reserve final determination for Government officials;

(b) Require proper identification of contractor personnel who attend meetings, answer Government

telephones, or work in situations where their actions could be construed as acts of Government

officials unless, in the judgment of the agency, no harm can come from failing to identify themselves;

and

(c) Require suitable marking of all documents or reports produced by contractors.

Parent topic: Subpart 11.1 - Selecting and Developing Requirements Documents
(April 18, 1980)

#### In the Matter of Marilyn Diaz, Appellant, et al., Petitioner, v Alice Sachs et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Jose Cruz et al., Respondents. In the Matter of Miguel Suarez, Respondent, v Alice Sachs et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, Alexander Castillo et al., Respondents, and Marilyn Diaz, Appellant.

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County, each entered April 9, 1980, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. (See *Matter of Suarez v Sadowski,*48 NY2d 620; *Matter of Ambro v Coveney,*20 NY2d 850, 20 NY2d 878; *Matter of Straniere v Cutolo,*59 AD2d 572.) No opinion. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Fein, Sandler and Silverman, JJ.
Exhibit 32.3





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Keyuan Petrochemicals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Weifeng Xue, Vice President of Accounting of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.








Date:  November 15, 2010








/s/ Weifeng Xue___________


Weifeng Xue


Vice President of Accounting
#### § 51.1300 General.

These standards apply to varieties such as Anjou, Bosc, Winter Nelis, Comice, Flemish Beauty and other similar varieties.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                             898,083
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,629,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                       132,930
<INVENTORY>                                      6,081,973
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,613,615
<PP&E>                                          13,017,802
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,495,252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,114,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,419,867
<BONDS>                                          5,418,013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               590
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,068,496
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,114,991
<SALES>                                         10,511,325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,828,209
<CGS>                                            8,883,661 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,491,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (49,584)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,199,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,813,665)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (6,373)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,807,293)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (1.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (1.97)
        


</TABLE>
# L_2013293EN.01002401.xml

| 5.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 293/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 293/24

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1085/2013

of 30 October 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Westfälischer Knochenschinken (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Westfälischer Knochenschinken’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Westfälischer Knochenschinken’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Westfälischer Knochenschinken’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Westfälischer Knochenschinken’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 102, 9.4.2013, p. 8.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2.   Meat-based products

GERMANY

Westfälischer Knochenschinken (PGI)

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SoPac Cellular Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ezra E.
Ezra, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of December, 2009.


/s/ Ezra E. Ezra
-------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
§ 4285.2 Cooperative agreement purposes. Rural Development Administration (RDA) or its successor agency may enter into a cooperative agreement with a State agency to provide funds to the State agency to: ( a ) Conduct marketing research related to agricultural cooperatives.
( b ) Assist other organizations in conducting marketing research related to agricultural cooperatives.
#### § 4279.102 Definitions and abbreviations.

The definitions and abbreviations in § 4279.2 are applicable to this subpart.
#### § 3560.609 [Reserved]
§ 51.3210 Serious damage. *Serious damage* unless otherwise specifically defined in this section, means any defect which seriously affects the appearance, or the edible or shipping quality of the onions. Any one of the following defects, or any combination of defects the seriousness of which exceeds the maximum allowed for any one defect, shall be considered as serious damage: ( a ) Seedstems when more than 1 ⁄ 2 inch in diameter;
( b ) Dry sunken areas when extending deeper than one fleshy scale, or when affecting an area equivalent to that of a circle 1 inch in diameter on an onion 23 ⁄ 4 inches in diameter, or correspondingly lesser or greater areas on smaller or larger onions;
( c ) Sprouting when any visible sprout is more than 1 ⁄ 2 in length;
( d ) Staining, dirt or foreign material when more than 25 percent of the onions in any lot are badly stained. Onions with adhering dirt or other foreign matter shall be judged on the same basis as stained onions;
( e ) Mechanical when any cut extends deeper than two fleshy scales, or when cuts seriously damage the appearance of the onion; and,
( f ) Watery scales when more than the equivalent of two entire outer fleshy scales are affected by an off-colored, watersoaked condition. The off-color must be of some shade of brown or yellow.
§ 5001.516 Protective advances. Protective advances are allowed only when they are necessary to preserve the value of the collateral. Therefore, a lender must exercise sound judgment in determining that the protective advance preserves collateral and recovery is actually enhanced by making the advance. ( a ) Protective advances must be reasonable with respect to the outstanding loan amount and the value of the collateral being preserved.
( b ) A lender cannot make protective advances in lieu of additional loans.
( c ) A lender must obtain written Agency approval for any protective advance that will cumulatively amount to more than $200,000, or 10 percent of the aggregate outstanding balance of principal and interest, whichever is less, to the same borrower.
( d ) Protective advances constitute an indebtedness of the borrower to the lender and must be secured by collateral to the same extent as the original guaranteed loan.
( e ) Notwithstanding § 5001.22(c) of this part, upon Agency approval, protective advances can be used to pay Federal tax liens or other Federal debt.
( f ) A Protective advance claim will be paid only at the time of the final payment as indicated in the report of loss. In the event of a final loss, protective advances may accrue interest at the promissory note rate from the date of such advance and will be guaranteed at the same percentage of loss as provided for in the loan note guarantee. The loan note guarantee will not cover interest on the protective advance accruing after the interest termination date.
( g ) The maximum loss to be paid by the Agency will never exceed the original loan amount plus accrued interest times the percentage of guarantee regardless of any protective advances made.
( h ) Holders do not have an interest in protective advances.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

STEVEN H. BEASLEY, 

Plaintiff,

vs. 5:02cv129-MMP/WCS

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner

Social Security Administration,

Defendants.

__________________________________/ 

O R D E R

This cause is before the court upon Defendant’s status report. Docs. 56. 

Defendant advises that the Appeals Council is still considering Plaintiff’s exceptions. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendant shall file a notice by July 29,

2005, advising the Court the status of the administrative proceedings on remand. 

DONE AND ORDERED on June 21, 2005.

s/ William C. Sherrrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:02-cv-00129-MP-WCS Document 57 Filed 06/21/05 Page 1 of 1
16.203-3 Limitations.

A fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment shall not be used unless the contracting

officer determines that it is necessary either to protect the contractor and the Government against

significant fluctuations in labor or material costs or to provide for contract price adjustment in the

event of changes in the contractor’s established prices.

Parent topic: 16.203 Fixed-price contracts with economic price adjustment.
# L_2014026EN.01004601.xml

| 29.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 26/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 26/46

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 of 2 December 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 325 of 5 December 2013
  )

On page 53, Article 1(1), end of first paragraph:

for:

‘... and 8541 40 29 0239) and originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China, unless they are in transit in the sense of Article V GATT.’,

read:

‘... and 8541409039) and originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China, unless they are in transit in the sense of Article V GATT.’.

---