alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 51.2949 U.S. No. 2. “U.S. No. 2” consists of walnuts in shells which are dry, practically clean and free from splits, and free from damage caused by broken shells, perforated shells, adhering hulls, discoloration or other means. The kernels are well dried, free from decay, dark discoloration, rancidity, and free from damage caused by mold, shriveling, insects or other means. (See § 51.2954.) ( a ) Kernel color shall be specified in connection with this grade in terms of “extra light,” “light,” “light amber,” or “amber” from the USDA Walnut Color Chart or in terms of “red” color. The color classifications in the USDA Walnut Color Chart shall not apply to “red” color. Furthermore, “red” color shall not be mixed with “extra light,” “light,” “light amber,” or “amber” colors. When kernel color is based on the color classifications from the USDA Walnut Color Chart, at least 60 percent, by count, of the walnuts have kernels which are not darker than “light amber,” and which are free from grade defects. Higher percentages of nuts with kernels not darker than “light amber” which are free from grade defects, and/or percentages with kernels not darker than “light” which are free from grade defects, may be specified in accordance with the facts. (See § 51.2954.)
( b ) Size shall be specified in connection with the grade. (See § 51.2952.)
[29 FR 12865, Sept. 12, 1964. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 82 FR 39657, Aug. 22, 2017]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29611]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Senior Executive Service: Performance Review Board Members

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Members for the FY 2010 Performance Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Title 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4) requires each agency to publish 
notification of the appointment of individuals who may serve as members 
of that Agency's Performance Review Board (PRB). The following 
individuals have been designated to serve on the FY 2010 Performance 
Review Board for the U.S. Small Business Administration.
    1. David B. Robbins, Chair, Associate Administrator for Management 
and Administration.
    2. Jonathan I. Carver, Chief Financial Officer and Associate 
Administrator for Performance Management.
    3. James E. Rivera, Deputy Associate Administrator for Disaster 
Assistance.
    4. Sara D. Lipscomb, General Counsel.
    5. Ana M. Ma, Chief of Staff.

Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-29611 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
§ 4287.312 Interest rate changes. ( a ) *Reductions.* The Borrower, Lender, and Holder (if any) may collectively initiate a permanent or temporary reduction in the Interest rate of the guaranteed loan at any time during the life of the loan upon written agreement among these parties. The Lender must obtain prior Agency concurrence and must provide a copy of the modification agreement to the Agency. If any of the guaranteed portion has been purchased by the Agency, the Agency (as a Holder) will affirm or reject Interest rate change proposals in writing. ( 1 ) Fixed rates can be changed to variable rates to reduce the Borrower's Interest rate only when the variable rate has a ceiling which is less than or equal to the original fixed rate.
( 2 ) The Interest rates, after adjustments, must comply with the requirements for Interest rates on new loans as established by § 4279.233 of this chapter.
( 3 ) The Lender is responsible for the legal documentation of Interest rate changes by an endorsement or any other legally effective amendment to the Promissory Note; however, no new Promissory Notes may be issued. The Lender must provide copies of all legal documents to the Agency.
( b ) *Increases.* Increases in fixed Interest rates and increases in variable rate basis are not permitted (except the normal fluctuations in approved variable Interest rates), unless a temporary Interest rate reduction occurred. Any increase in rates must be for Good Cause.
161 So.2d 280

#### Dr. Sheldon TEER and Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Sidney C. EMFINGER, Jr., and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

No. 47102.

March 16, 1964.

In re: Sidney C. Emfinger, Jr., and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Com*810pany applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Tensas. 159 So.2d 331.

The application is denied. According to the facts of the case, as found to be by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Petie P. Maguire, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Good Earth Land Sales Company (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A2 of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: September 30, 2010  /s/ Petie P. Maguire Petie P. Maguire President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Good Earth Land Sales Company and will be retained by Good Earth Land Sales Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
46.203 Criteria for use of contract quality

requirements.

The extent of contract quality requirements, including contractor inspection, required under a

contract shall usually be based upon the classification of the contract item (supply or service) as

determined by its technical description, its complexity, and the criticality of its application.

(a) Technical description. Contract items may be technically classified as-

(1) Commercial (described in commercial catalogs, drawings, or industrial standards; see part 2); or

(2) Military-Federal (described in Government drawings and specifications).

(b) Complexity.

(1) Complex items have quality characteristics, not wholly visible in the end item, for which

contractual conformance must be established progressively through precise measurements, tests,

and controls applied during purchasing, manufacturing, performance, assembly, and functional

operation either as an individual item or in conjunction with other items.

(2) Noncomplex items have quality characteristics for which simple measurement and test of the end

item are sufficient to determine conformance to contract requirements.

(c) Criticality.

(1) A critical application of an item is one in which the failure of the item could injure personnel or

jeopardize a vital agency mission. A critical item may be either peculiar, meaning it has only one

application, or common, meaning it has multiple applications.

(2) A noncritical application is any other application. Noncritical items may also be either peculiar or

common.

Parent topic: Subpart 46.2 - Contract Quality Requirements
PDFversion

----

| **Accident No.:**        | HWY-98-FH-004                                                                                       |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **Accident Type:**       | Loss of control on downgrade; collision of loadwith school bus                                      |
| **Location:**            | Franklin, North Carolina                                                                       |
| **Date and Time:**       | October 16, 1997; 9:30 p.m.                                                                         |
| **Vehicle 1 (V1):**      | 1988 Kenworth tractor with a 1988 Lufkin flatbedsemitrailer hauling concrete telephone cable vaults |
| **Vehicle 2 (V2):**      | 1984 International/Thomas Built school bus                                                          |
| **Fatalities/Injuries:** | 2 fatalities, 1 moderate injury, 8 minor injuries                                                   |

**Accident Description**
The tractor-semitrailer was traveling downhill on the wrong side ofU.S. Highway 64 on a curve when the load broke loose and struck the schoolbus. The tractor-semitrailer overturned and slid to a stop. (See figure1.) The school bus driver and one passenger were killed; one passengersustained moderate injuries. The truckdriver and seven bus passengers sustainedminor injuries. The school bus was destroyed and the tractor-semitrailersustained moderate damage. Witnesses described the truck as traveling overthe 35-mph speed limit and on the wrong side of the road just before theaccident.
The truckdriver was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol(a portable breath tester indicated that his blood alcohol level exceeded0.10 percent). An open vodka bottle was found in the tractor. The truckdriverhad been convicted twice before of driving commercial vehicles while intoxicated.
**State/Federal Oversight**
North Carolina has adopted the *Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations*with some variances; none of the variances were pertinent to the carrieror driver at the time of the accident. The carrier received a satisfactoryrating following a Federal compliance review in January 1994.

**Figure 1.** Accident diagram.
**Probable Cause**
The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probablecause of the accident was the truckdriver's failure to control his truckdue to alcohol impairment.
**Adopted:** September 17, 2002 
NTSB Home | Publications
37.110 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       (a) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.237-1, Site Visit, in solicitations for services to be performed on Government installations, unless the solicitation is for construction.                                          (b) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.237-2, Protection of Government Buildings, Equipment, and Vegetation, in solicitations and contracts for services to be performed on Government installations, unless a construction contract is contemplated.                                          (c) 						            The contracting officer may insert the clause at 52.237-3, Continuity of Services, in solicitations and contracts for services, when-                                                         (1) 								                The services under the contract are considered vital to the Government and must be continued without interruption and when, upon contract expiration, a successor, either the Government or another contractor, may continue them; and                                                            (2) 								                The Government anticipates difficulties during the transition from one contractor to another or to the Government. Examples of instances where use of the clause may be appropriate are services in remote locations or services requiring personnel with special security clearances.                                                                             (d) 						            See 9.508 regarding the use of an appropriate provision and clause concerning the subject of conflict-of-interest, which may at times be significant in solicitations and contracts for services.                                          (e) 						            The contracting officer shall also insert in solicitations and contracts for services the provisions and clauses prescribed elsewhere in 48 CFR Chapter 1, as appropriate for each acquisition, depending on the conditions that are applicable.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 37.1 - Service Contracts-General
Amendment to Employment Agreement, Stephen A. Wynn



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Employment Agreement is by and between Stephen A. Wynn
(“Employee”) and Wynn Resorts, Limited (“Employer”). 
 WHEREAS, Employee and Employer have entered in to that certain Employment
Agreement dated as of October 4, 2002, as amended (the “Employment Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, due to the ongoing negative economic climate,
Employee and Employer desire to amend the Employment Agreement in order to assist Employer to maintain business stability thereby preserving Employee’s employment. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Amendment to Base Salary. Effective February 16, 2009, the term “Base Salary” shall be mean $2,762,500 per annum. 

  

	 	2.	Other Provisions of Agreement. The parties acknowledge that the Employment Agreement is being modified only as stated herein, and agree that nothing else in the Employment
Agreement shall be affected by this Amendment. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed as of the date below. 
  

							
	WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED	 		 	EMPLOYEE
			
	 /s/ Marc Schorr
	 		 	 /s/ Stephen A. Wynn
 Stephen A. Wynn

				
	 By:
	 	 Marc Schorr
	 		 	 Date:  February 16, 2009

				
	 Its:
	 	 COO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JOSHUA DEWITT, 

PLAINTIFF, 

v. CASE NO.: 3:20-cv-05728-MCR-EMT 

DYNAMIC SECURITY INC. 

DEFENDANT. 

_____________________________/ 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, through their 

undersigned attorneys, that the above-captioned action be dismissed, with prejudice, 

with each party to bear his or its own costs. 

Dated: June 7, 2021 

/s/ Clayton M. Connors, w/ perm.

Clayton M. Connors, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.: 0095553

Email: cmc@westconlaw.com

WESTBERRY & CONNORS, LLC.

4400 Bayou Blvd., Suite 32A

Pensacola, Florida 32503 

Tel: (850) 473-0401 

Attorney for the Plaintiff 

/s/ Wesley C. Redmond, Esq.

Wesley C. Redmond 

Email:wredmond@fordharrison.com 

FORDHARRISON LLP 

420 20th Street North, Suite 2560 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

Tel: (205) 244-5905 

Attorney for the Defendant 

WSACTIVELLP:12331406.1

Case 3:20-cv-05728-MCR-EMT Document 16 Filed 06/07/21 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2622 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2622

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 12-Hydroxyoctadecanoic 
 acid, reaction product with N,N-dimethyl-1,3-propanediamine, dimethyl 
                         sulfate, quaternized.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 2006

  Mr. Voinovich (for himself and Mr. DeWine) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 12-Hydroxyoctadecanoic 
 acid, reaction product with N,N-dimethyl-1,3-propanediamine, dimethyl 
                         sulfate, quaternized.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 12-HYDROXYOCTADECANOIC ACID, REACTION PRODUCT WITH N,N-
              DIMETHYL-1,3-PROPANEDIAMINE, DIMETHYL SULFATE, 
              QUATERNIZED.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.21 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 12-Hydroxyoctadecanoic acid, 
reaction product with N,N-dimethyl-1,3-propanediamine, dimethyl 
sulfate, quaternized) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 73164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29926]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

November 22, 2010.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. A copy of the submission 
may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer 
listed. Comments regarding this information collection should be 
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury PRA Clearance 
Officer, Department of the Treasury, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Suite 11010, Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before December 29, 
2010 to be assured of consideration.

Bureau of the Public Debt (BPD)

    OMB Number: 1535-0122.
    Type of Review: Extension without change of a currently approved 
collection.
    Title: Voluntary Customer Satisfaction Survey To Implement 
Executive Order 12862.
    Abstract: Voluntary surveys to determine customer satisfaction with 
BPD products and services.
    Respondents: Individuals and Households.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 876 hours.
    Bureau Clearance Officer: Bruce Sharp, Bureau of the Public Debt, 
200 Third Street, Parkersburg, West Virginia 26106; (304) 480-8112.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and Budget, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-
7873.

Robert Dahl,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-29926 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
EXHIBIT 11

UNITIL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER
AVERAGE COMMON SHARE OUTSTANDING

(Millions, except for per share data)

(UNAUDITED)



|                                                                       |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ----- | ---- | - | -----
|                                                                       |  | Three Months EndedMarch 31,
|                                                                       |  | 2009                        |       | 2008
|Net Income                                                             |  | $                           | 9.1   |      | $ | 3.3  
|Less: Dividend Requirements on Preferred Stock                         |  |                             |      |      |   |     
|                                                                       |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|                                                                       |  |                            
|Net Income Applicable to Common Stock                                  |  | $                           | 9.1   |      | $ | 3.3  
|                                                                       |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|                                                                       |  |                            
|Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding  Basic (000s)   |  |                             | 8,018 |      |   | 5,719
|                                                                       |  |                            
|Dilutive Effect of Stock Options and Restricted Stock (000s)          |  |                             |      |      |   | 5    
|                                                                       |  |                            
|Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding  Diluted (000s) |  |                             | 8,018 |      |   | 5,724
|                                                                       |  |                            
|Earnings Per Share  Basic                                             |  | $                           | 1.14  |      | $ | 0.57 
|                                                                       |  |                            
|Earnings Per Share  Diluted                                           |  | $                           | 1.14  |      | $ | 0.57
§ 3565.352 Preservation of affordable housing. ( a ) *Original purpose.* During the period of the guarantee, owners are prohibited from using the housing or related facilities for any purpose other than an approved program purpose.
( b ) *Use restriction.* For the original term of the guaranteed loan, the housing must remain available for occupancy by low and moderate income households, in accordance with subpart E of this part. This requirement will be included in a deed restriction or other instrument acceptable to the Agency. The restriction will apply unless the housing is acquired by foreclosure or an instrument in lieu of foreclosure, or the Agency waives the applicability of this requirement after determining that each of the following three circumstances exist. ( 1 ) There is no longer a need for low-and moderate-income housing in the market area in which the housing is located;
( 2 ) Housing opportunities for low-income households and minorities will not be reduced as a result of the waiver; and
( 3 ) Additional federal assistance will not be necessary as a result of the waiver.
#### § 51.1404 Size classification.

Size of pecans may be specified in connection with the grade in accordance with one of the following classifications. To meet the requirements for any one of the classifications in Table 1 to this section, the lot must conform to both the specified number of nuts per pound and the weight of the 10 smallest nuts per 100-nut sample.

Table 1 to [§ 51.1404](/on/2024-09-16/title-7/section-51.1404)

| Size classification | Number of nuts per pound | Minimum weight of the 10 smallest nuts per 100-nut sample |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Jumbo Extra Large Large | 55 or less 56 to 63 64 to 77 | In each classification, the 10 smallest nuts per 100 must weigh at least 7% of the total weight of the 100-nut sample. |
| Medium | 78 to 100 | |
| Small | 101 or more | |
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2513 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Spiroxamine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Spiroxamine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SEC. 1180. SPIROXAMINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.70 8-(1,1-Dimethylethyl)-Nethyl-N-propyl-1,4- 

dioxaspiro[4,5]decane-2- 

methanamine (CAS 118134– 

30–8) (provided for in subheading 2932.99.90) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 2513 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS