alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of O2 Secure Wireless, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), does
hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:




1. 
The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) of
the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and




2. 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






/s/  Keith A.
Greaves
31.002 Availability of accounting guide.

Contractors needing assistance in developing or improving their accounting systems and procedures

may request a copy of the Defense Contract Audit Agency Pamphlet No.7641.90, Information for

Contractors. The pamphlet is available via the Internet at http://www.dcaa.mil.

Parent topic: Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
§ 3560.6 Borrower responsibility and requirements. ( a ) Borrower responsibilities and requirements specified in this part may be carried out by an individual or entity designated by the borrower to act on behalf of the borrower such as a resident manager or management agent. Ultimate accountability to the Agency, however, is with the borrower whether or not the borrower designated another person or entity to act on the borrower's behalf.
( b ) Borrowers who have not executed a loan agreement, and who were not required to execute a loan agreement by the regulations in effect at the time of their loan closing are exempt from the requirements of subparts D through G of this part, as long as the borrower is not in default of any applicable requirement, security instrument, payment, or any other agreement with the Agency. Such borrowers must provide evidence of tenant income eligibility in accordance with § 3560.152(a), except in Farm Labor Housing where the tenant is not paying shelter cost.
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  quarterly  report  of Tels  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report")  the
undersigned in the capacity and on the date indicated  below,  hereby  certifies
that  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and the  information
contained in this Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
conditions and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 23, 2004

/s/ Bill Steadman
-----------------
Bill Steadman
Chief Financial Officer
Tels Corporation
# L_2013249EN.01000101.xml

| 19.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 249/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 249/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 895/2013

of 18 September 2013

amending for the 202nd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al Qaida network

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al-Qaida network, (1) and in particular Article 7(1)(a) and 7a(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 11 September 2013 the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) decided to remove one person from its list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 11 September 2013 the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) decided to remove one person from its list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be updated accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be updated accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 September 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments

---

(1)  
  OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9.

1

---

ANNEX

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as follows:

The following entry under the heading ‘Natural persons’ is deleted:

‘Mufti Rashid Ahmad Ladehyanoy (alias (a) Ludhianvi, Mufti Rashid Ahmad, (b) Ahmad, Mufti Rasheed, (c) Wadehyanoy, Mufti Rashid Ahmad). Nationality: Pakistani. Other information: (a) Founder of Al-Rashid Trust; (b) Reportedly deceased in Pakistan on 18 Feb. 2002. Date of designation referred to in Article 2a (4) (b): 17.10.2001.’

---
32.706-2 Clauses for limitation of cost or

funds.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.232-20, Limitation of Cost, in solicitations

and contracts if a fully funded cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated, whether or not the

contract provides for payment of a fee.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.232-22, Limitation of Funds, in solicitations

and contracts if an incrementally funded cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated.

Parent topic: 32.706 Contract clauses.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 3:20cr40/MCR

JAMES YOUNG

 /

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there has been no timely objections, and subject to this Court’s

consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(3), the plea of

guilty of the Defendant, JAMES YOUNG, to Counts One, Six, Seven, Eleven,

Thirteen, Fourteen and Fifteen of the Indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties

shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of December 2020.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00040-MCR Document 177 Filed 12/08/20 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Louis Howard Boehner (Also Known as L. Howard Boehner), an Attorney.

Motion for reinstatement granted. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, MeGivern, McNally and 'Steuer, JJ.
#### § 29.3050 Quality.

A division of a group or the second factor of a grade, based on the relative degree of one or more elements of quality in tobacco.

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 51722, Nov. 17, 1982, and at 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984]
#### § 51.900 Sunburn.

*Sunburn* means injury to the berry caused by exposure to the sun, including “sulphur burn,” usually occurring as a sunken and discolored or dried area on the exposed surface.

[36 FR 9126, May 20, 1971. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981. Redesignated at 56 FR 15802, Apr. 18, 1991]
(November 10, 1980)

#### Evelyn Carraway, Appellant, v Krishna Pradhah, Respondent.

Motion for extension of time to perfect appeal granted, and time extended to 30 days following the determination of the Court of Appeals in the case of *Calhoun v Pickett*(77 AD2d 776).
**ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNITY AGREEMENT**

 

**ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNITY AGREEMENT**(the “Agreement”) made as of the ____ day of August, 2006, by EVEREST BAYBERRY, LP, a California limited partnership, having an office at c/o Everest Properties, 199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 200, Pasadena, California 91101 Attn: W. Robert Kohorst (“Borrower”), and SECURED INVESTMENT RESOURCES FUND, LP II,****a Delaware limited partnership having an office at c/o Everest Properties, Inc., 199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 200, Pasadena, California 91101 (“Principal;” Borrower and Principal hereinafter collectively referred to as “Indemnitor”), in favor of LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, FSB, a federal stock savings bank, having an office at c/o Lehman Brothers, Inc., 1000 West Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (“Indemnitee”) and otherIndemnified Parties (defined below).

 

**RECITALS:**

 

A.    Borrower is the fee owner of that certain real property located in the City of Lee’s Summit, County of Jackson and State of Missouri, known as Bayberry Crossing and more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto (said real property, together with any real property hereafter encumbered by the lien of the Security Instrument (as defined in the Note), being herein collectively referred to as the “Land”; the Land, together with all structures, buildings and improvements now or hereafter located on the Land, being collectively referred to as the “Property”).

 

B.        Indemnitee is prepared to make a loan (the “Loan”) to Borrower in the principal amount of Three Million One Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($3,125,000.00), to be evidenced by a certain promissory note of even date herewith in the principal amount of Three Million One Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($3,125,000.00) made by Borrower to Indemnitee (the “Note”) and secured by, among other things the Security Instrument (as defined in the Note) which will encumber the Property. 

 

C.        Indemnitee is unwilling to make the Loan unless Indemnitor agrees to provide the indemnification, representations, warranties, and covenants and other matters described in this Agreement for the benefit of Indemnified Parties.

 

D.        SECURED INVESTMENT RESOURCES, LP II****is the sole limited partner of Borrower owning 100% of the partnership interests of Borrower and thus will derive substantial benefit from the Loan. Indemnitor enters into this Agreement to induce Indemnitee to make the Loan.

 

**AGREEMENT**

 

**NOW THEREFORE,**in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, 

 

----
#### § 51.17 Official sampling.

Samples may be officially drawn by any duly authorized inspector and delivered, or shipped, for analysis and certification to the nearest designated market or to such market as shall be directed by the Administrator. The container in which such samples are delivered, or shipped, shall contain a statement, signed by the inspector who drew the samples, showing the time and place of the sampling and the brands or other identifying marks of the containers from which the samples were drawn. The certificate based on such samples shall show the time and place of drawing the samples, and the name of the inspector by whom they were drawn.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 3:97cr92/RV

3:97cr103/RV

CHRISTOPHER SUMMERS

ORDER

The defendant has filed a notice of appeal of this court’s order denying his motion

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(A) and request for certificate of appealability in each of the

above-styled cases. (Doc. 48 & 47). It does not appear that a certificate of appealability

is required under the circumstances of this case. See Finkelstein v. Spitzer, 455 F.3d 131,

132 (2nd Cir. 2006) (citing United States v. Baptiste, 223 F.3d 188, 189 n.1 (3rd Cir. 2000));

United States v. Guerra, 187 Fed. Appx. 414, 415 (5th Cir. 2006); cf. Galatolo v. United

States, 196 Fed. Appx. 854 (11th Cir. 2006); United States v. Sullivan, 2005 WL 2090236

(11th Cir. 2005) (denying certificate of appealability where § 1651 motion was construed as

impermissible second or successive § 2255 motion). Therefore, defendant’s request is

denied as unnecessary. See Guerra, 187 Fed.Appx. at 415.

The court finds that the appeals are not taken in good faith and he is not otherwise

entitled to so proceed. Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3). Defendant’s motions for leave to proceed

in forma pauperis are denied and he shall pay the $455.00 filing fee within thirty days.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of June, 2009.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:97-cr-00092-RV-CJK Document 51 Filed 06/30/09 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Canales, Also Known as Jose Canalles, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 27, 1977, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. With commendable candor, the People concede that on the facts of this case, defendant’s conviction must be reversed because of the failure to produce the confidential informant. Such production was required in light of a number of factors, including the testimony of the undercover officer, the People’s sole witness to the crime, that the informant introduced the officer to the seller, remained in the room while the seller weighed the narcotics, returned to the room while the seller was counting his money, and left with the officer, the fact that defendant’s arrest occurred more than nine months after the narcotics sale, and the fact that, in his testimony at trial, defendant denied ever seeing the officer before. On the new trial, defendant shall be entitled to disclosure of the informant’s identity and production of the informant for an interrogation, *in camera,*before the Trial Judge (see *People v Goggins,*34 NY2d 163; *People v Tranchina,*64 AD2d 616). In the event the informant cannot be produced at the time of the trial, relevant inquiry shall be made under the principles of *People v Jenkins*(41 NY2d 307). We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
§ 51.2839 Application of tolerances. Individual samples are subject to the following limitations: ( a ) Samples which contain more than 20 pounds shall have not more than one and one half times a specified tolerance of 10 percent or more, and not more than double a specified tolerance of less than 10 percent, except that at least one defective and one off-size onion may be permitted in any sample: *Provided,* that en-route or at destination when onions in containers of 50 pounds or more are packed to a minimum size of 3 inches or larger not more than three onions or more than 4 percent (whichever is the larger amount) may be affected by decay or wet sunscald: *And provided further,* that the averages for the entire lot are within the tolerances specified for the grade; and,
( b ) Samples which contain 20 pounds or less shall have not more than double the tolerance specified, except that at least one defective and one off-size onion may be permitted in any sample: *Provided,* that the averages for the entire lot are within the tolerances specified for the grade.
9.110-1 Definitions.

As used in this section—

Covered agency means–

(1)The Department of Defense;

(2)Any department or agency for which regular appropriations are made in a Department of Labor,

Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act;

(3)The Department of Homeland Security;

(4)The National Nuclear Security Administration of the Department of Energy;

(5)The Department of Transportation; or

(6)The Central Intelligence Agency.

Institution of higher education means an institution that meets the requirements of 20 U.S.C. 1001

and includes all sub-elements of such an institution.

Parent topic: 9.110 Reserve Officer Training Corps and military recruiting on campus.
Exhibit 10.1


 


Mary G. Puma


Chairman and CEO


Tel: (978) 787-4226


Fax: (978) 787-4090


 


May 1,
2009


Board
of Directors


Axcelis
Technologies, Inc.


c/o
Stephen R. Hardis, Lead Director


108
Cherry Hill Drive


Beverly,
Massachusetts 01915


 


Re: Modification of Compensation of Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman


 


Dear Members of the Axcelis
Board of Directors:


 


I
am writing to propose that my base pay at Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
be reduced to a rate of $400,000 per year for the calendar years 2009 and
2010.  This amount represents a 20%
reduction from my current rate of pay, which has been set forth in the Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and me effective November 6,
2007 (the “Employment Agreement”).  For
the calendar year 2009, my rate of pay shall be reduced beginning with the
first payroll after the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
accepts this proposal, and such rate shall take into account the pay reductions
previously implemented during 2009 through unpaid shutdowns.  I have previously informed you that I would
not accept a bonus payment for 2008 and I also propose that I will not have a
bonus opportunity in respect of the calendar year 2009.


 


Accordingly,
this letter will serve as my agreement to modifications of:


 


(A) the
minimum annual rate of base pay set forth in Section 3 of the Employment
Agreement to the amount of $400,000 for calendar years 2009 and 2010; and


 


(B) the
provisions of Section 5 of the Employment Agreement pertaining to  annual bonuses to reflect my proposals
regarding the 2008 and 2009 bonuses described in the above paragraph.


 


In
the event that I am at any time entitled to separation pay under the Employment
Agreement or under the Change of Control Agreement between the Company and me
dated as of November 6, 2007, my base compensation rate and bonus
opportunities shall be unaffected by this letter and all amounts due to me
shall be calculated as if the modifications described in this letter had never
taken effect.


 


Sincerely,


 




	
  /s/
  Mary G. Puma

  	
   

  
	
  Mary
  G. Puma

  	
   

  
	
  Chairman
  and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.3025 Managing the Operations of a RBIC. ( a ) *Nonperformance.* In addition to the provisions specified in § 4290.507, failure of an approved Non-leveraged RBIC to maintain sound investment practice, as determined by the Agency, may result in loss of approval for participating in this program.
( b ) *Employment of USDA or SBA officials.* Paragraph (a)(2) of § 4290.509 does not apply to Non-leveraged RBICs.
( c ) *Approval of RBIC's Investment Adviser/Manager.* In addition to complying with § 4290.510, a Non-leveraged RBIC must notify the Agency of the Management Expenses to be incurred under such contract, or of any subsequent material changes in such Management Expenses, within 30 days of execution.
( d ) *Management Expenses of a RBIC.* When complying with § 4290.520, Non-leveraged RBICs do not need prior approval of initial Management Expenses and any increases in those expenses.
( e ) *Restrictions on investments of idle funds by RBICs.* The provisions of § 4290.530 apply to Non-leveraged RBICs only when the Non-leveraged RBIC engages in activities not contemplated by the Act.
( f ) *Prior approval of secured third-party debt of RBICs.* The provisions of § 4290.550 do not apply to Non-leveraged RBICs.
( g ) *Voluntary decrease in Regulatory Capital.* When complying with § 4290.585, Non-leveraged RBICs do not need to obtain prior approval for decreases in Regulatory Capital of more than 2 percent (but not below the minimum required under this Act or these regulations). However, Non-leveraged RBICs must report the reduction to the Agency within 30 days.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 242 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 242

To establish 4 memorials to the Space Shuttle Columbia in the State of 
                                 Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2005

 Mrs. Hutchison (for herself and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish 4 memorials to the Space Shuttle Columbia in the State of 
                                 Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Columbia Space Shuttle Memorials Act 
of 2005''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Memorial.--The term ``memorial'' means each of the 
        memorials to the Space Shuttle Columbia established by section 
        3(a).
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior, acting through the Director of the National 
        Park Service.

SEC. 3. MEMORIALS TO THE SPACE SHUTTLE COLUMBIA.

    (a) Establishment.--There are established, as units of the National 
Park System, 4 memorials to the Space Shuttle Columbia to be located on 
the 4 parcels of land in the State of Texas described in subsection (b) 
on which large debris from the Space Shuttle Columbia was recovered.
    (b) Description of Land.--The parcels of land referred to in 
subsection (a) are--
            (1) the parcel of land owned by the Fredonia Corporation, 
        located at the southeast corner of the intersection of East 
        Hospital Street and North Fredonia Street, Nacogdoches, Texas;
            (2) the parcel of land owned by Temple Inland Inc., 10 
        acres of a 61-acre tract bounded by State Highway 83 and Bayou 
        Bend Road, Hemphill, Texas;
            (3) the parcel of land owned by the city of Lufkin, Texas, 
        located at City Hall Park, 301 Charlton Street, Lufkin, Texas; 
        and
            (4) the parcel of land owned by San Augustine County, 
        Texas, located at 1109 Oaklawn Street, San Augustine, Texas.
    (c) Administration.--The memorials shall be administered by the 
Secretary.
    (d) Additional Sites.--The Secretary may recommend to Congress 
additional sites in the State of Texas related to the Space Shuttle 
Columbia for establishment as memorials to the Space Shuttle Columbia.
                                 <all>
```