alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FLN (Rev. 3/2007) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1

3:94cr3012LAC - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. RAY ANTHONY WILLIAMS and MARTIN LUTHER WILLIAMS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs

RAY ANTHONY WILLIAMS AND

 MARTIN LUTHER WILLIAMS

Case No.3:94cr3012LAC 

ORDER

Attn: Mr. Ray Anthony Williams

Your document, MOTION OBJECTION TO GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO

PETITIONER’S MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT FOR SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION, CONSTRUCTIVE AMENDMENT AND STRUCTURAL ERROR

DATED JULY 16, 2008, was referred to the undersigned with the following deficiencies:

The document does not have an original signature of Defendant Martin

Luther Williams. You are not allowed to file documents on behalf of

another party.

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:

The document shall remain in the electronic file, but the court will not consider it until

you have corrected the above deficiencies through the filing of a corrected document. 

The document shall remain in the electronic file, but no further pleadings will be

accepted unless they comply with NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA local rules.

XXX The Clerk shall return the document to the filing party. 

DONE and ORDERED this 1st day of August, 2008.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:94-cr-03012-LC-MD Document 819 Filed 08/01/08 Page 1 of 1
#### § 51.2122 Insect injury.

*Insect injury* means that the insect, web, or frass is present or there is definite evidence of insect feeding.
Subpart 42.14 - [Reserved]           **Parent topic:** Part 42 - Contract Administration and Audit Services
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOHN L. NORMAN,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-437-MW-MJF

DAVID MADDOX, et al.,

Defendant.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 32. While Plaintiff has not shown his entitlement 

to a temporary restraining order at this time, such a showing requires a plaintiff to 

clear a high bar. While this Court offers no opinion on the final outcome of this 

matter, a party who fails to obtain a temporary restraining order may well be 

entitled to other relief. Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the 

parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

order. Plaintiff’s Application for Temporary Restraining Order, ECF No. 31, is 

Case 4:20-cv-00437-MW-MJF Document 40 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 2
2

DENIED. The Clerk is directed to remand the matter to Magistrate Judge Frank

for further consideration. 

SO ORDERED on February 16, 2021.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00437-MW-MJF Document 40 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 2
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2228 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2404 Race Street, Jonesboro, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Hattie W. Caraway 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2006 

Mrs. LINCOLN (for herself and Mr. PRYOR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2404 Race Street, Jonesboro, Arkansas, as 

the ‘‘Hattie W. Caraway Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HATTIE W. CARAWAY POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 2404 Race Street, Jonesboro, Ar6 kansas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Hattie W. 

7 Caraway Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2 

•S 2228 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Hattie W. Caraway 

3 Post Office’’. 

Æ
§ 52.3183a Styles of dried prunes. ( a ) Whole Unpitted—from which pits have not been removed.
( b ) Whole Pitted—from which pits have been removed.
[30 FR 11596, Sept. 10, 1965. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977 and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981]
#### In the Matter of Artrisa Y. Thomas, Petitioner, v Frank G. Straub et al., Respondents.

[818 NYS2d 90]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Frank G. Straub, as Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety, City of White Plains, dated January 5, 2004, which rescinded a conditional offer to the petitioner of probationary employment as a police officer on the ground that she failed a qualifying medical examination.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

This proceeding was improperly transferred to this Court by the Supreme Court, Westchester County, pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g) *(see Matter of Pabon v Phillips,*16 AD3d 589 [2005]; *Thurman v Holahan,*123 AD2d 687 [1986]). However, we will *596retain jurisdiction and decide this case on the merits *(see Matter of Pabon v Phillips, supra; Matter of Giano v Coughlin,*162 AD2d 986 [1990]).

“An appointing authority has wide discretion in determining the fitness of candidates. . . . This discretion is particularly broad in the hiring of law enforcement officers, to whom high standards may be applied. ... As long as the administrative determination is not irrational or arbitrary, this Court will not interfere with it” *(Matter of Verme v Suffolk County Dept. of Civ. Serv.,*5 AD3d 498, 498-499 [2004]; *see Matter of Mark v Schneider,*305 AD2d 685 [2003]; *Matter of Needleman v County of Rockland,*270 AD2d 423 [2000]). In determining whether a candidate is medically qualified to serve as a police officer, the appointing authority is entitled to rely upon the findings of its own medical personnel, even if those findings are contrary to those of professionals retained by the candidate, and the judicial function is exhausted once a rational basis for the conclusion is found *(see Matter of Winnegar v County of Suffolk,*13 AD3d 382 [2004]; *Matter of Curcio v Nassau County Civ. Serv. Commn.,*220 AD2d 412 [1995]).

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the physician who examined her on behalf of the respondents was entitled to rely on the petitioner’s medical history, including military medical records diagnosing her with an incurable condition known as Raynaud’s syndrome, and restricting her activity in connection therewith, in deciding that she failed the qualifying medical examination. Although the petitioner maintained that she did not have the condition, the respondents were not bound by her submissions, and a rational basis existed for the determination rescinding the conditional offer of probationary employment made to her on the ground that she did not pass the qualifying medical examination *(see e.g. Matter of Stephens v Suffolk County Dept. of Civ. Serv.,*15 AD3d 589 [2005]).

The petitioner’s remaining contention is not properly before us, since it was not raised in the petition *(see Matter of Stoves & Stone, Ltd. v Martinez,*17 AD3d 683 [2005]; *Matter of Miller v McMahon,*240 AD2d 806 [1997]; *Matter of David v Christian,*134 AD2d 349 [1987]). Prudenti, P.J., Miller, Mastro and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.700 Requirements concerning types of enterprises to receive financing. ( a ) *Financing requirements.* Beginning after the third fiscal year after the issuance of your RBIC license and at the close of each of your fiscal years thereafter, you must be in compliance with the Financing percentages specified in this paragraph (a). ( 1 ) *Rural Business Concerns.* At least 75 percent of your Financings (in total dollars) to your Portfolio Concerns must have been to Rural Business Concerns.
( 2 ) *Smaller Enterprises.* More than 50 percent of your Financings (in total dollars) to your Portfolio Concerns must have been to Smaller Enterprises that, at the time of the initial Financing to such Enterprise, meet either the net worth/net income test or the size standard set forth in the “Smaller Enterprise” definition in § 4290.50.
( 3 ) *Urban Areas.* No more than 10 percent of your Financings (in total dollars) to your Portfolio Concerns must have been made to Portfolio Concerns located in an Urban Area.
( b ) *Non-compliance.* If you are not in compliance with any of the Financing percentages specified in paragraph (a) of this section at the end of the third fiscal year after the issuance of your RBIC license or any fiscal year thereafter, you must come into compliance by the end of the following fiscal year. For as long as you remain out of compliance, you are not eligible for additional Leverage (see § 4290.1120).
[85 FR 16523, Mar. 24, 2020]
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 7568

Not in labor force

Number in thousands

70 to 74 years

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU05024941Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Not in Labor Force, 70-74 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:10:16 PM)
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KEVIN EUGENE WALKER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20-cv-5959-LC/MJF

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

Defendant.

/

ORD ER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report

and Recommendation dated July 25, 2022. (ECF No. 16). The parties have been

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that

it should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-05959-LC-MJF Document 17 Filed 08/25/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED, and this action is

REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further

proceedings consistent with this order.

3. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and

close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of August, 2022.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3:20-cv-5959-LC/MJF

Case 3:20-cv-05959-LC-MJF Document 17 Filed 08/25/22 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PICTURETEL'S
BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q FILING.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          37,536
<SECURITIES>                                    13,833
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,871)
<INVENTORY>                                     43,089
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               215,703
<PP&E>                                          76,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                (47,323)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,129
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           330
<OTHER-SE>                                     212,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   212,950
<SALES>                                        105,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,001
<CGS>                                           54,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,984
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,515
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,469
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,469
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

         The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Orion
HealthCorp, Inc. (the "small business issuer"), hereby certifies as follows:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer (the
"Report"), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the small
business issuer.

Dated this 14th day of May, 2007.

/s/ Terrence L. Bauer
----------------------------------------------
Terrence L. Bauer, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the small business issuer and
will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 4285.46 Prohibited use of cooperative agreement funds. ( a ) The Agricultural Marketing Act prohibits the use of Federal funds to pay for newspaper or periodical space and radio and television time, either directly to the media or indirectly though an advertising agency or other firm. County and State fair exhibits, as well as commodity months and weeks, are also excluded as the research on cooperatives program activities.
( b ) Federal funds cannot be used to purchase products or samples of products to give away to the public.
( c ) Federal program funds cannot be used to purchase: ( 1 ) Promotional pieces such as point-of-sale materials, promotional kits, billboard space and signs, streamers, automobile stickers, table tents, and placemats; or
( 2 ) Promotion items of a personal gift nature.
( d ) Cooperative agreement funds cannot be used to conduct general publicity or information programs designed to build the image of the State's agriculture or of a particular State Department of Agriculture or Agricultural Experiment Station.
( e ) Project funds cannot be used to pay for the salary and travel of employees of cooperatives, trade associations, commodity groups, and other industry organizations, or of State personnel while engaged in managing market orders, cooperatives, or other group endeavors.
( f ) Commissioners, Directors, and Secretaries of State Departments of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Stations, and other State agencies cannot charge their salaries and travel to project funds, with the exception of travel to workshops or conferences devoted to the Federal-State Research On Cooperatives Program.
( g ) Funds made available for this program shall not be subject to reduction for indirect costs or for tuition remission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          17,842
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,976,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,024,090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,144,412
<PP&E>                                         210,778
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,726,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,255,456
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,128,370
<COMMON>                                       143,521
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,726,288
<SALES>                                      1,950,073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,950,073
<CGS>                                        1,339,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,339,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               896,031
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             452,212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (748,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (748,481)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

LOGO

TIANYUAN LAW FIRM

11F/Tower C, Corporate Square,

35 Financial St. Beijing. 100032,

P. R. China

Tel:
(8610) 8809-2188;

Fax: (8610)8809-2150.

Date: October 23, 2008

New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.

No.6 Hai Dian Zhong Street

9th Floor

Haidian District, Beijing 100080

Peoples Republic of China

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the use of
our name under the captions REGULATION and RISK FACTORS included in the Form 20-F, which is filed by New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. on October 23, 2008, with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(D) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008. In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under
Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the regulations promulgated thereunder.



|                      
|----------------------
|Sincerely yours,      
|                      
|/s/ Tian Yuan Law Firm



1
3.403 Applicability.       This subpart applies to all contracts. Statutory requirements for negotiated contracts are, as a matter of policy, extended to sealed bid contracts.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3.4 - Contingent Fees
#### Ronny-Gerard, Inc., Respondent, v Philip Wichard, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 31, 1979, affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Murphy at Special Term. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
29.402-3 Tax on certain foreign procurements.       (a) Insert the provision at 52.229-11, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements—Notice and Representation, in solicitations, including solicitations using part  12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, unless one of the following exceptions applies:                                                         (1) Acquisitions using simplified acquisition procedures that do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (as defined in 2.101).                                                            (2) Emergency acquisitions using the emergency acquisition flexibilities defined in part  18.                                                            (3) Acquisitions using the unusual and compelling urgency authority per 6.303-2.                                                            (4) Contracts with a single individual for personal services that will not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold on an annual calendar year basis for all years of the contract.                                                            (5) Acquisitions if the requiring activity identifies that the requirement is for certain foreign humanitarian assistance contracts which are payments made by the U.S. Government agencies pursuant to a contract with a foreign contracting party to obtain goods or services described in or authorized under 7 U.S.C. 1691, et seq., 22 U.S.C. 2151, et seq., 22 U.S.C 2601 et seq., 22 U.S.C. 5801 et seq., 22 U.S.C. 5401 et seq., 10 U.S.C. 402, 10 U.S.C. 404, 10 U.S.C. 407, 10 U.S.C. 2557, and 10 U.S.C. 2561.                                                                             (b) Insert the clause at 52.229-12, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements, in—                                                         (1) Solicitations that contain the provision at 52.229-11, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements—Notice and Representation; and                                                            (2) Resultant contracts in which the contractor has indicated that it was a foreign person in solicitation provision 52.229-11, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements—Notice and Representation.    **Parent topic:** 29.402 Foreign contracts.
#### § 51.320 Diameter.

When measuring for minimum size, “diameter” means the greatest dimension of the apple measured at right angles to a line from stem to blossom end. When measuring for maximum size, “diameter” means the smallest dimension of the apple determined by passing the apple through a round opening in any position.
# 27.201 Patent and copyright infringement liability.

- 27.201-1 General. 
- 27.201-2 Contract clauses. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 27.2 - Patents and Copyrights
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
vs CASE NO. 1:94-CR-01009 MMP

F LEE BAILEY

FINANCIAL REFERRAL AND ORDER

Transfer of registry funds to unclaimed funds

Explanation: This case has $525,619.10 including interest in the Court Registry Investment System
(CRIS). The Guide to Judiciary Policies and Procedures directs that any unclaimed fund balance held in
the registry after the conclusion of a case for a period longer than the statutorily required period should
be transferred to the unclaimed funds account. The statutory period for the above funds is five years.
This case meets those requirements. I am requesting authorization to transfer these funds plus any
additional accrued interest from CRIS to the unclaimed funds account held by the US Treasury.

Fund that are held in the unclaimed funds account can be disbursed by an order of the court.

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS, Clerk of Court

Prepared by: __s/Philip Detweiler

Philip Detweiler, Financial Specialist Date: February 10, 2011
Referred by: 6 bee t if athy d Deputy Clerk
ORDER OF COURT

It is ORDERED this_11"_ day of _February , 2011, that the Clerk

a Transfer the identified funds to the unclaimed fund account.
Continue to hold in CRIS.

Other direction from the Court.

NAORICE M. PAUL, SENIOR
ITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Recdged {7d 1UeDeF Ini png2et

Adopted: 12/03/99