alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 5:98cr36-RH

NATHAN GAMBLES,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER TERMINATING SUPERVISED RELEASE

By letter, the defendant Nathan Gambles has requested early termination of 

supervised release. Mr. Gambles has been on supervised release for nearly four 

years. He has held steady employment and, at least as shown by the record, has 

complied with his conditions of supervision except for twice using marijuana. The 

most recent use occurred more than a year ago.

I have considered the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) the criteria in 

Monograph 109 as approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States. I 

find that termination of supervised release at this time is warranted by the 

defendant’s conduct and the interest of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1). 

Accordingly,

Case 5:98-cr-00036-RH Document 461 Filed 09/07/15 Page 1 of 2
IT IS ORDERED:

The defendant Nathan Gamble’s term of supervised release is terminated as 

of September 7, 2015, at 3:48 p.m.

SO ORDERED on September 7, 2015.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:98-cr-00036-RH Document 461 Filed 09/07/15 Page 2 of 2
Page
        26


**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Statement
      of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.** § **1350**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, as the chief financial officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,
      that:





1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/
                R. Alan MillerR.
                Alan MillerChief
                Financial OfficerMay
                5, 2006
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

GINO L. BROWNING, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-299-RV/MJF 

JOHNATHAN COOK, et al., 

Defendants. 

 / 

ORDER 

 On December 7, 2022, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation. (ECF No. 73). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report 

and Recommendation and were afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant 

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The plaintiff has filed an 

objection, which I have reviewed de novo.1

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed 

objection thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1

 The plaintiff’s objection was untimely, but he has filed a motion requesting that I accept 

the objection as timely filed (ECF No. 77). By separate order being entered contemporaneously 

herewith, I will grant his motion and consider his objection timely. 

Case 5:20-cv-00299-RV-MJF Document 82 Filed 01/06/23 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

5:20-cv-299-RV/MJF 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. Defendant Donald Allen’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the 

extent that Plaintiff’s Eighth-Amendment excessive-force claim based on Defendant 

Donald Allen’s use of “chemical agents” is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

3. Defendant Donald Allen’s motion to dismiss is DENIED in all other 

respects. 

4. This case is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of January 2023. 

 s/ Roger Vinson /

ROGER VINSON 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:20-cv-00299-RV-MJF Document 82 Filed 01/06/23 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RISCHI RAMDIAL,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20cv516-TKW-MAF

HUMANA INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendant.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 6). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed with prejudice 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915A(b) and Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). 

Thus, the Court need not consider whether dismissal is also warranted based on 

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Order requiring him to pay the partial filing 

fee.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this Order. 

Case 4:20-cv-00516-TKW-MAF Document 8 Filed 12/29/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice, and the Clerk shall close the 

case file.

3. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to pay the partial filing fee 

(Doc. 7) is DENIED as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of December, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00516-TKW-MAF Document 8 Filed 12/29/20 Page 2 of 2
# 32.1006 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**Subpart 32.10 - Performance-Based Payments
Exhibit 23.3 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We have issued our report dated March 12, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Katonah 2007-I CLO Ltd., included in the Annual Report of KCAP Financial, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of KCAP Financial, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-175838, effective July 28, 2011; and File No. 333-151995, effective June 27, 2008). /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP New York, New YorkMarch 31, 2015
     Exhibit 23.3 Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants We have issued our report dated March 12, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Katonah X CLO Ltd., included in the Annual Report of KCAP Financial, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of KCAP Financial, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-175838, effective July 28, 2011; and File No. 333-151995, effective June 27, 2008). /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP New York, New YorkMarch 31, 2015
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CORVELLA DENESE 

WILLIAMS-ROSIER,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv480–WS/EMT

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

the Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 9) docketed January 8, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that this case

be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. Plaintiff

has filed no objections to the report and recommendation. 

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Case 4:20-cv-00480-WS-EMT Document 10 Filed 02/08/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 9) is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint and this action are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and for failure to prosecute the

case.

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment, stating: "All claims are dismissed

without prejudice."

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of February , 2021.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00480-WS-EMT Document 10 Filed 02/08/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DAVID P. CAULDER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:02CV396-SPM/AK

DOUGLAS S. LYONS,

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The third amended complaint in this cause was served on the several defendants

alleging a number of constitutional and state law claims related to a civil suit Plaintiff

purported to prosecute. (Doc. 20). The Defendants moved to dismiss and for summary

judgment, and it was recommended by the undersigned that all the claims be

dismissed, except those against Defendant Douglas Lyons. (Docs. 48 and 50). These

recommendations were adopted (docs. 49 and 52), and this cause was remanded to the

undersigned for further proceedings related to the remaining claims against Defendant

Lyons. The parties were permitted discovery, and Defendant served Plaintiff with

written discovery on June 27, 2005. (Doc. 55). Plaintiff did not respond to the

Case 4:02-cv-00396-SPM-AK Document 59 Filed 03/10/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

No. 4:02CV396-SPM/AK

discovery requests and Defendant moved to compel (doc. 56), which this Court granted

and directed Plaintiff to respond without objection to the outstanding discovery requests

on or before January 20, 2006. (Doc. 57). Plaintiff has not complied with that Order.

Defendant Lyons has moved to dismiss this cause for failure to comply with the Court’s

Orders and for failure to prosecute. (Doc. 58). Plaintiff has not responded to the motion

to dismiss or otherwise communicated with Defendant or the Court. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash Railroad, 370 U.S. 626, 82 S. Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed2d 734

(1962). Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) also authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for

failure to obey a court order. Plaintiff has failed to comply with two orders of this Court

directing that he participate in discovery (docs. 55 and 57) and has not otherwise

prosecuted his lawsuit. Consequently, this case should be dismissed.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

with prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Gainesville, Florida, this 10th day of March, 2006.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s objections within 10 days after

being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of

review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case 4:02-cv-00396-SPM-AK Document 59 Filed 03/10/06 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 4:03cv223-RH/WCS

MARY L. WATKINS, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER ON FORECLOSURE PROCEDURES

At a telephonic status conference on May 2, 2005, attorneys for the plaintiff

(the government) and defendant Chancay, Inc., appeared. No appearance was

made on behalf of the other defendants, all of whom were already in default for

failure to respond to the government’s original or amended complaint. The

government and Chancay agreed that this matter should proceed to foreclosure of

the subject property on the government’s amended complaint, free and clear of all

liens, with net proceeds paid first to Chancay and then to the government. Any

remaining net proceeds will be held for distribution as may be appropriate and as

may be directed by further order. Foreclosure on the amended complaint will

render Chancay’s proposed counterclaim moot, unless (as appears unlikely) the

Case 4:03-cv-00223-RH-WCS Document 35 Filed 05/03/05 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No: 4:03cv223-RH/WCS

foreclosure sale yields insufficient proceeds to pay Chancay’s claim. The

counterclaim, which was submitted after the deadline for filing as of right and was

submitted without leave of court, will be struck. 

For these reasons, a separate judgment for foreclosure will be entered. That

judgment has not been entered simultaneously with this order (as was anticipated at

the time of the status conference), because the record includes no evidence of the

amount owed to Chancay. Accordingly, Chancay will be required to file an

affidavit or other evidence of the amount it is owed. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The government’s motion (document 25) for default judgment is

GRANTED.

2. The counterclaim of defendant Chancay, Inc. (document 26) is struck

without prejudice to the filing of a motion for leave to file a counterclaim if

Chancay’s claim is not satisfied prior to, or by virtue of, the foreclosure sale of the

subject property on the government’s amended complaint.

3. The motions of defendant Chancay, Inc., for entry of default with respect

to its counterclaim (documents 31, 32, and 33) are DENIED AS MOOT.

4. Defendant Chancay, Inc., shall file within 10 days an affidavit or other 

Case 4:03-cv-00223-RH-WCS Document 35 Filed 05/03/05 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No: 4:03cv223-RH/WCS

evidence establishing the amount of the debt secured by its mortgage.

SO ORDERED this 3d day of May, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:03-cv-00223-RH-WCS Document 35 Filed 05/03/05 Page 3 of 3
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2474 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Violet 11:1 Dye. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2006 

Mr. DEWINE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Violet 11:1 Dye. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BASIC VIOLET 11:1 DYE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by striking subheading 9902.70.03 and inserting 

7 in numerical sequence the following new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.32.13 Basic Violet 11:1 Dye (CAS 

No. 73398–89–7) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.13.60) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 2474 IS 

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
33.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes policies and procedures for filing protests and for processing contract disputes

and appeals.

Parent topic: Part 33 Protests, Disputes, and Appeals
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:97-cr-00013-MP-AK

 1:97-cr-00047-MP-AK

CLYDE TURNER DELOACH,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1311, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, which recommends that Defendant’s Motion to Vacate in Case No. 1:97-cr00013, Doc. 1301, be denied, and that Defendant’s Motion to Vacate in Case No. 1:97-cr-00047,

Doc. 141, also be denied. The Magistrate Judge filed the Report and Recommendation on

Wednesday, February 13, 2008. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and have

been afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo review of those portions to which an

objection has been made. In this instance, however, no objections have been filed.

Defendant was sentenced to a total of 162 months imprisonment following convictions

for conspiracy to possess marijuana, cocaine, and methamphetamine, obstruction of justice by

tampering with witnesses, and two counts of assaulting a law enforcement officer. In his motion

to vacate, Defendant claims that his sentence violates United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220

(2005), that his sentencing counsel was ineffective by failing to inform him of Booker, and that

counsel misadvised him regarding his right to appeal. After reviewing the matter, the Magistrate

recommends that Defendant’s motion to vacate be denied. The Court agrees with the Magistrate. 

Case 1:97-cr-00013-MW-GRJ Document 1312 Filed 03/14/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:1:97-cr-00013-MP-AK

Booker is plainly not applicable to cases on collateral review, and counsel cannot be deemed

ineffective for failing to anticipate changes in the law. Finally, the Court agrees with the

Magistrate that the record does not reflect that Defendant told counsel to file a notice of appeal,

but rather that Defendant accepted counsel’s recommendation and consciously made the decision

not to appeal based upon counsel’s advice. 

Therefore, having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the lack of objections

thereto, I have determined that it should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and

incorporated herein.

2. Defendant’s Motion to Vacate in Case No. 1:97-cr-00013, Doc. 1301, is

DENIED.

3. Defendant’s Motion to Vacate in Case No. 1:97-cr-00047, Doc. 141, is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of March, 2008

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:97-cr-00013-MW-GRJ Document 1312 Filed 03/14/08 Page 2 of 2
#### § 51.2119 Well dried.

*Well dried* means that the kernel is firm and brittle, and not pliable or leathery.
Part 40 - Reserved

Parent topic: Federal Acquisition Regulation
#### § 51.1815 U.S. No. 1 Russet.

The requirements for this grade are the same as for U.S. No. 1 except that at least 30 percent, by count, of the fruit shall have more than one-third of their surface, in the aggregate, affected by any type of discoloration. For tolerances see § 51.1820.
31.102 Fixed-price contracts.

The applicable subparts of part 31 shall be used in the pricing of fixed-price contracts, subcontracts,

and modifications to contracts and subcontracts whenever (a) cost analysis is performed, or (b)a

fixed-price contract clause requires the determination or negotiation of costs. However, application

of cost principles to fixed-price contracts and subcontracts shall not be construed as a requirement

to negotiate agreements on individual elements of cost in arriving at agreement on the total price.

The final price accepted by the parties reflects agreement only on the total price. Further,

notwithstanding the mandatory use of cost principles, the objective will continue to be to negotiate

prices that are fair and reasonable, cost and other factors considered.

Parent topic: Subpart 31.1 - Applicability
#### § 51.2954 Tolerances for grade defects.

In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, the following tolerances shall be permitted for nuts which fail to meet the requirements of the respective grades as indicated. Terms in quotation marks refer to color classifications illustrated on the color chart.

| Grade | External (shell) defects | Internal (kernel) defects | Kernel color based on USDA Walnut Color Chart | Kernel color based on red |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| U.S. No. 1 | 10%, by count, for splits. 5%, by count, for other shell defects, including not more than 3% seriously damaged | 10% total, by count, including not more than 6% which are damaged by mold or insects or seriously damaged by other means, of which not more than 5/6 or 5% may be damaged by insects, but no part of any tolerance shall be allowed for walnuts containing live insects | No tolerance to reduce the required 70% of “light amber” kernels or the required 40% of “light” kernels or any larger percentage of “light amber” or “light” kernels specified | |
| U.S. No. 2 | 10%, by count, for splits. 10%, by count, for other shell defects, including not more than 5% serious damage by adhering hulls | 15% total, by count, including not more than 8% which are damaged by mold or insects or seriously damaged by other means, of which not more than 5/8 or 5% may be damaged by insects, but no part of any tolerance shall be allowed for walnuts containing live insects | No tolerance to reduce the required 60% or any specified larger percentage of “light amber” kernels, or any specified percentage of “light” kernels | |
| U.S. No. 3 | Same as above tolerance for U.S. No. 2 | Same as above tolerance for U.S. No. 2 | No tolerance to reduce any percentage of “light amber” or “light” kernel specified | |

Tolerances for Grade Defects

[41 FR 44187, Oct. 7, 1976. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 82 FR 39658, Aug. 22, 2017]
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the annual
report of Phoenix Energy Resource Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rene Soullier, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.     The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

2.     The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Rene
SoullierRene Soullier Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)

October 6, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Phoenix Energy Resource Corporation and will be
retained by Phoenix Energy Resource Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
36.503 Site investigation and conditions

affecting the work.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-3, Site Investigation and Conditions

Affecting the Work, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract or a fixedprice dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements contract is contemplated and the

contract amount is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. The contracting officer

may insert the clause in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction or a fixed-price

contract for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements is contemplated and the contract

amount is expected to be at or below the simplified acquisition threshold.

Parent topic: Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses