alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of John Bubany, Petitioner, v. State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of respondent State Liquor Authority which disapproved petitioner’s application for a retail liquor store license. The proceeding has been transferred to this court for disposition. Determination annulled, without costs, and matter remitted to respondent for the purpose of holding a hearing, in accordance with the memorandum herewith, and making a determination *de novo.*In our opinion, it is clear from the record presented that petitioner’s application was disapproved because the premises were within 200 feet of a school and thus were barred by subdivision 3 of section 105 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. However, the premises are not on the same street or avenue as the school and the mandatory prohibition of the statute is inapplicable *(Matter of Cup & Saucer Cottage Rest.*v. *New York State Liq. Auth.,*19 A D 2d 597, affd. 13 N Y 2d 1050; *Matter of Surface Line Operators Fraternal Organization v. New York State Liq. Auth.,*25 A D 2d 775, mot. for lv. to app. den. 17 N Y 2d 425). It is our opinion, accordingly, that on this record the matter should be remitted to the Authority for the purpose of holding a hearing on the question whether public convenience and advantage would not be served by the approval of petitioner’s application. Motion by petitioner to strike certain paragraphs from respondent’s answer, together with certain exhibits annexed thereto, insofar as it was transferred to this court, denied, without costs (cf. *Matter of Collins*v. *Behan,*285 N. Y. 187; *Matter of Miller*v. *McGovern,*283 App. Div. 575). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.
#### FROST, Appellant, v. SOCIETY OF AGRICULTURE & HORTICULTURE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by Catharine Frost, as administratrix, against the Society of Agriculture & Horticulture of Westchester County.

PER CURIAM.

Order modified by inserting a provision requiring the defendant to pay the costs of the trial and all disbursements in the action to date, together with the costs of this appeal; all to be paid within 20 days from the entry of this order, and, as thus modified, affirmed. Otherwise order reversed, and judgment unanimously directed on the verdict, with costs and costs of this appeal.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 D0 39 3 . THOMAS MANNAPSO v . ROBYN LYNN GLARNER.

Th o m as M an n ap s o fi l ed t h i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap peal fro m t h e t ri al

co u rt ’ s Feb ru ary 1 2
, 2 0 2 0
, o rd er d en y in g a m o t i o n to s et as i d e. 1 M an n ap s o fi l ed a

m o ti o n t o wi t h d raw t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap pl i cat i o n , wh i ch i s h ereb y GRANTED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 M an n ap s o f

i l ed b o th an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal an d a d i rect ap p eal in t h e Su p rem e Co u rt , wh i ch t ran s ferred t h e m at t ers t o t h i s Co u rt

. See Cas e No s

. S2 0 A1 1 3 9 an d S2 0D1 1 7 8 , t ran s ferred M ay 1 8, 2 0 20

. June 23, 2020

06/23/2020
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Elementary EducationElementary School StudentsFamily School RelationshipJunior High School StudentsJunior High SchoolsMiddle School StudentsMiddle SchoolsStudent AdjustmentStudent AttitudesStudent MotivationTransitional Programs

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### In the Matter of William G. Gardner et al., Appellants, v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term which, among other things, (1) stayed arbitration of a claim for damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by reason of the negligence of an uninsured motorist, asserted against respondent Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) pursuant to accident indemnification indorsements incorporated in claimant’s automobile liability policy and in a like policy issued to his father, each providing uninsured motorist coverage in accordance with subdivision 2-a of section 167 of the Insurance Law, and (2) directed a jury trial of the issue whether the filing of notice of claim by the injured 17-year-old infant 120 days after the accident satisfied the condition precedent prescribed by the policy that written notice be given MVAIC within 90 days “ or as soon as practicable ”, The order was proper. *(Matter of Rosenbaum [American Sur. Co. of N.*Y.], 11 N Y 2d 310, 314; *Matter of Motor Vehicle Acc. Ind. Corp.*[Brown], 15 A D 2d 578, app. dsmd. 11 N Y 2d 968.) The issue of timely filing is of the sort that may be raised, as it was here, by the mere averment of the" date of the accident and that of the filing; and appellants’ reliance upon *Matter of Beakbane (MVAIC)*(20 A D 2d 736) is misplaced, as there the failure of “ any evidentiary showing of the existence of * * * issues ” was on the part of MVAIC in offering no factual contradiction of the clear averments of physical contact. In this case, at least, it cannot be held as a matter of law that by reason of claimant’s infancy, the filing was “as soon as practicable” (but cf. *Matter of McNulty*v. *Motor Vehicle Acc. Ind. Corp.,*51 Misc 2d 1, 4); but his infancy and the disability which may be found to have been attributable thereto may well have great relevance in the evaluation of the critical factor of practicability, just as the mere fact of infancy is to be weighed and considered under the body of decisional law which has dealt with the somewhat analogous provisions of section 608 of the Insurance Law and section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. Order affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in memorandum *per curiam.*
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.18


 
  Salary Amendments to Employment
  Arrangements with Named Executive Officers    
    



	Named Executive Officer
 
	 	2005 Annual Base Salary

Rate Effective February 7, 2005

	Dr. Joshua Boger	 	$547,319
	Dr. Vicki Sato	 	$459,747
	Dr. N. Anthony Coles	 	$383,352
	Dr. Peter Mueller	 	$406,952
	Mr. Ian Smith	 	$360,003













QuickLinks


Salary Amendments to Employment Arrangements with Named Executive Officers
National Interest: From Abstraction to Strategy

MICHAEL G. ROSKIN

From *Parameters*, Winter 1994, pp. 4-18. 
"We have no eternal allies and we have no perpetual enemies. Ourinterests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our dutyto follow."
#### § 52.14 Order of inspection service.

Inspection service shall be performed, insofar as practicable, in the order in which applications therefor are made except that precedence may be given to any such applications which are made by the United States (including, but not being limited to, any instrumentality or agency thereof) and to any application for an appeal inspection.
Exhibit 34.3

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of DirectorsThe Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas:

We have examined the accompanying management’s assertion that the Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (collectively the ‘‘Company’’) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Honda Auto Receivables 2006-2 Owner Trust asset-backed securities transaction (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i), 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), 1122(d)(4)(xiv) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of March 31, 2007 and for the period August 22, 2006 through March 31, 2007. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the transaction specified above or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria, as of March 31, 2007 and for the period August 22, 2006 through March 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois

June 1, 2007

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Francisco Velasquez, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 20,1979, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second and third degrees, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Nine months after the narcotics sale in question and after establishment of defendant’s identity as the seller, the undercover officer involved in the sale was sent to Puerto Rico to bring defendant, who was being held in a Puerto Rican jail, back to New York. The undercover, rather than another officer, was sent in case it became necessary to establish defendant’s identity at an extradition hearing. We hold that the undercover’s meeting of defendant at the Puerto Rican prison was not an identification procedure and that the undercover’s testimony at trial as to the circumstances of that meeting, testimony which was merely cumulative on the question of identity, did not prejudicially bolster the undercover’s other identification testimony. (See *People v Morales,*37 NY2d 262.) Damiani, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-K/A (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the year ended December 31, 2010:





1. Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.





Date:  May 2, 2011
/s/ Joseph KozakJoseph Kozak, Chief Executive Officer and President





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Exhibit 21.1



|                                          |  |             
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|List of Subsidiaries(1)                  
|                                          | 
|                                          |  | Jurisdiction
|Katonah Debt Advisors,
L.L.C.(2)          |  | Delaware    
|Kohlberg Capital Funding LLC I            |  | Delaware    
|Katonah Management Holdings
LLC(2)        |  | Delaware    
|Katonah X Management
LLC(2)(3)            |  | Delaware    
|Katonah 2007-I Management
LLC(2)(3)       |  | Delaware    
|Katonah 2008-II Management
LLC(2)(3)      |  | Delaware    
|Katonah Scotts Cove Management
LLC(2)(3) |  | Delaware    
|KPKSI Management Holdings
LLC(2)          |  | Delaware    
|KPKSI Holdings
LLC(2)(4)                  |  | Delaware    



|(1) | Excludes a 35%
interest in PKSIL LLC.
|--- | -------------------------------------

|(2) | Represents a
wholly-owned portfolio company that is not consolidated for financial reporting purposes.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | A wholly-owned
subsidiary of Katonah Management Holdings LLC.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | A wholly-owned
subsidiary of KPKSI Management Holdings LLC.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Elizabeth M. Walker, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which dismissed claimant’s appeal from a Referee’s decision denying benefits, such dismissal being on the ground that such appeal was not taken “ Within twenty days after the mailing or personal delivery of notice of the decision of a referee on contested benefit claims ”. (Labor Law, § 621, subd. 1.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.
- 2-DIETHYLAMINOETHANOL
PREFACE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PHYSICAL & CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
OCCURRENCE & USE
KINETICS
GENERAL TOXICOLOGY
ORGAN EFFECTS
IMMUNOTOXICITY
MUTAGENICITY & GENOTOXICITY
CARCINOGENICITY
EFFECTS ON REPRODUCTION
CASE REPORTS
EXPOSURE-EFFECT RELATIONSHIP
RESEARCH NEEDS
DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS
SUMMARY
SUMMARY IN SWEDISH
REFERENCES
APPENDIX I
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 5:03cr1-RH/WCS

5:04cv174-RH/WCS

KEITH L. SINGLETON,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER DENYING §2255 MOTION

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 103), to which no objections have been filed. Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the opinion

of the court. Defendant’s amended motion (document 95) to vacate sentence

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2255 is DENIED with prejudice. The clerk shall enter

judgment and close the file.

SO ORDERED this 21st day of September, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 5:03-cr-00001-RH-AK Document 104 Filed 09/21/05 Page 1 of 1
15.402 Pricing policy.

Contracting officers shall-

(a) Purchase supplies and services from responsible sources at fair and reasonable prices. In

establishing the reasonableness of the offered prices, the contracting officer-

(1) Shall obtain certified cost or pricing data when required by 15.403-4, along with data other than

certified cost or pricing data as necessary to establish a fair and reasonable price; or

(2) When certified cost or pricing data are not required by 15.403-4, shall obtain data other than

certified cost or pricing data as necessary to establish a fair and reasonable price, generally using

the following order of preference in determining the type of data required:

(i) No additional data from the offeror, if the price is based on adequate price competition, except as

provided by 15.403-3(b).

(ii) Data other than certified cost or pricing data such as-

(A) Data related to prices (e.g., established catalog or market prices, sales to non-governmental and

governmental entities), relying first on data available within the Government; second, on data

obtained from sources other than the offeror; and, if necessary, on data obtained from the offeror.

When obtaining data from the offeror is necessary, unless an exception under 15.403-1(b)(1) or (2)

applies, such data submitted by the offeror shall include, at a minimum, appropriate data on the

prices at which the same or similar items have been sold previously, adequate for evaluating the

reasonableness of the price.

(B) Cost data to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine a fair and reasonable

price.

(3) Obtain the type and quantity of data necessary to establish a fair and reasonable price, but not

more data than is necessary. Requesting unnecessary data can lead to increased proposal

preparation costs, generally extend acquisition lead time, and consume additional contractor and

Government resources. Use techniques such as, but not limited to, price analysis, cost analysis,

and/or cost realism analysis to establish a fair and reasonable price. If a fair and reasonable price

cannot be established by the contracting officer from the analyses of the data obtained or submitted

to date, the contracting officer shall require the submission of additional data sufficient for the

contracting officer to support the determination of the fair and reasonable price.

(b) Price each contract separately and independently and not-

(1) Use proposed price reductions under other contracts as an evaluation factor; or

(2) Consider losses or profits realized or anticipated under other contracts.

(c) Not include in a contract price any amount for a specified contingency to the extent that the

contract provides for a price adjustment based upon the occurrence of that contingency.

Parent topic: Subpart 15.4 - Contract Pricing
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                 /s/ C. E. PORTER
                                 -------------------------------
                                 C. E. Porter
                                 Chief Executive Officer


                                 /s/ R. ALAN MILLER
                                 --------------------------------
                                 R. Alan Miller
                                 Chief Financial Officer


Date:  November 12, 2004
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  quarterly  report  of Tels  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report") the
undersigned in the capacity and on the date indicated  below,  hereby  certifies
that  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and the  information
contained in this Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 12, 2004
/s/ Ron Wolfbauer, Jr.
----------------------
Ron Wolfbauer, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer/President
Tels Corporation (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)