alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(January 23, 1980)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Thomas K. Topping, Petitioner, v Stephen Dalsheim, as Superintendent of the Ossining Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Application for writ of habeas corpus dated October 25, 1979 denied. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Staley, Jr., Casey and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
§ 3565.53 Guarantee fees. As a condition of receiving a loan guarantee, the Agency will charge the following guarantee fees to the lender. Changes to the initial and annual guarantee fees will be established by the Agency and will be published in a notice in the Federal Register. ( a ) *Initial guarantee fee.* The Agency will establish and charge an initial guarantee fee of up to one percent of the guarantee amount. For purposes of calculating this fee, the guarantee amount is the product of the percentage of the guarantee times the initial principal amount of the guaranteed loan.
( b ) *Annual guarantee fee.* An annual guarantee fee will be charged, as established by the Agency, each year or portion of a year that the guarantee is in effect. This fee is due no later than February 28, of each calendar year.
( c ) *Surcharge for guarantees on construction advances.* The Agency may, at its sole discretion, charge an additional fee on the portion of the loan advanced during construction. If applicable, this fee will be charged in advance at the start of construction.
[63 FR 39458, July 22, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 32372, June 16, 1999; 73 FR 11812, Mar. 5, 2008; 84 FR 55036, Oct. 15, 2019; 85 FR 77986, Dec. 3, 2020]
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DELROY A. CHAMBERS, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv234–WS/MAF

H2 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC,

doing business as HOLLOWAY PROPERTY

MANAGEMENT,

Defendant.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the plaintiff's notice (ECF No. 12) of voluntary dismissal

with prejudice. By such notice, the plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed this case

with prejudice. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the

dismissal was effective upon the filing of the plaintiff's notice. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

The clerk shall close the case, noting on the docket that this case has been

dismissed with prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of August , 2020.

Case 4:20-cv-00234-WS-MAF Document 13 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00234-WS-MAF Document 13 Filed 08/05/20 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.885 Disposition of assets to RBIC's Associates or to competitors of Portfolio Concerns.

Except with the Agency's prior written approval, you are not permitted to dispose of assets (including assets acquired in liquidation) to any Associate or to competitors of Portfolio Concerns if you have outstanding Leverage. As a prerequisite to such approval, you must demonstrate that the proposed terms of disposal are at least as favorable to you as the terms obtainable elsewhere.
52.104 Procedures for modifying and completing provisions and clauses.       (a) 						            The contracting officer must not modify provisions and clauses unless the FAR authorizes their modification. For example-                                                         (1) 								                "The contracting officer may use a period shorter than 60 days (but not less than 30 days) in paragraph (x) of the clause"; or                                                            (2) 								                "The contracting officer may substitute the words ‘task order’ for the word ‘Schedule’ wherever that word appears in the clause."                                                                             (b) 						            When modifying provisions or clauses incorporated by reference, insert the changed wording directly below the title of the provision or clause identifying to the lowest level necessary (*e.g.,* paragraph, sentence, word), to clearly indicate what is being modified.                                          (c) 						            When modifying provisions or clauses incorporated in full text, modify the language directly by substituting the changed wording as permitted.                                          (d) 						            When completing blanks in provisions or clauses incorporated by reference, insert the fill-in information directly below the title of the provision or clause identifying to the lowest level necessary to clearly indicate the blanks being filled in.                                          (e) 						            When completing blanks in provisions or clauses incorporated in full text, insert the fill-in information in the blanks of the provision or clause.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 52.1 - Instructions for Using Provisions and Clauses
#### In the Matter of Department of Social Services, Appellant, v Charles L., Respondent.

In a paternity proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated August 17, 1979, which dismissed the petition. Order reversed, on the law, and proceeding remitted to the Family Court for a new hearing consistent herewith, with costs to petitioner to abide the event. The Family Court, while accepting the testimony of the child’s mother and her witness, nevertheless dismissed the petition because of the absence of medical testimony surrounding the fact of prematurity and the period of gestation,, which was alleged to be approximately 217 days. This was error. The court should have granted counsel for the petitioner a brief adjournment to permit him to introduce medical evidence as to prematurity. Since this was not done, the order dismissing the petition must be reversed and the case remitted for further proceedings at which medical evidence may be adduced concerning the alleged prematurity of the child (see *Matter of Gail O. v Van Randolph P.,*60 AD2d 944; *Matter of Morris v Terry K.,*60 AD2d 728; *Matter of Kathy “R” v Steven "S",*47 AD2d 680; *Matter of Suzanne “J” v Russell “K”,*46 AD2d 935; *Matter of Margie “L” v Gary “M”,*46 AD2d 935). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
# C_2014090EN.01025501.xml

| 28.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/255 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/255

---

Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises for the financial year 2013 — amending budget No 1

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 58 of 28 February 2014
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 58 of 28 February 2014

(2014/C 90/48)

On the cover page and page 25:

for:

for:

‘Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises’,

read:

read:

‘Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation’.

---
March
      26,
      2008





Mr.
      Thomas Edward
      Pumford, Jr.


Secretary, Treasurer and
      CFO


Liberty
      Renewable Fuels
      LLC


3508
      East
      M-21


Corunna, MI
      48817





***Re:***
            ***Consent
                to Disclosure SSR’s Name and Role in Form 10-K***




Dear
      Mr.
      Pumford:





We
      hereby consent
      to the
      use
      in this Form 10-K
      of
      our report
      delivered on
      January 2, 2007
      for
      the Fair Value of
      Profit Interest Units
      (Value of
      Shared-Based Units)
      relating to the
      financial statements
      of Liberty Renewable
      Fuels, LLC as
      of
      December 31,
      2007 and for
      the
      period from inception (June
      21, 2006)
      to
      December 31,
      2007.





Sincerely,







Mark
      R, Fournier, CFA


Director


Stout
      Risius Ross, Inc.








4000
                  Town Center, 20thFloorSouthfield,
                  MI 48075
                ph.
                  248.208.8800
                fax
                  248.208.8822
                www.srr.com
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2597 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2597

            To facilitate homeownership in high-cost areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 7, 2006

 Mrs. Clinton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To facilitate homeownership in high-cost areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Housing Fairness Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. FHA SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING MAXIMUM MORTGAGE LIMIT.

    Section 203(b)(2)(A) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 
1709(b)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``95 percent'' and inserting 
        ``100 percent'';
            (2) in clause (ii)--
                    (A) by striking ``87 percent '' and inserting ``100 
                percent'' ; and
                    (B) by striking ``for Fiscal Year'' and inserting a 
                comma; and
            (3) by moving subparagraph (A), including clauses (i) and 
        (ii) of such subparagraph, 2 ems to the right.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2014099EN.01002501.xml

| 2.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 99/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 99/25

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 31 March 2014

appointing a Luxembourg member and two Luxembourg alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

(2014/182/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Luxembourg Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Dan KERSCH. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Dan KERSCH.

| (3) | An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Yves CRUCHTEN. An alternate member's seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Roby BIWER as member of the Committee of the Regions, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Yves CRUCHTEN. An alternate member's seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Roby BIWER as member of the Committee of the Regions,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| (a) | as member:






  — | Mr Roby BIWER, Conseiller communal de la commune de Bettembourg; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as member:

—

Mr Roby BIWER, Conseiller communal de la commune de Bettembourg;

and

| (b) | as alternate members:






  — | Mr Tom JUNGEN, Bourgmestre de la commune de Roeser, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate members:

—

Mr Tom JUNGEN, Bourgmestre de la commune de Roeser,

| — | Ms Christine SCHWEICH, Bourgmestre de la commune de Mondercange. |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Christine SCHWEICH, Bourgmestre de la commune de Mondercange.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 31 March 2014.

For the Council

The President

D. KOURKOULAS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
Case 4:21-cv-00020-AW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 1 of 11
Case 4:21-cv-00020-AW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 2 of 11
Case 4:21-cv-00020-AW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 3 of 11
Case 4:21-cv-00020-AW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 4 of 11
Case 4:21-cv-00020-AW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 5 of 11
Case 4:21-cv-00020-AW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 6 of 11
Case 4:21-cv-00020-AW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 7 of 11
Case 4:21-cv-00020-AW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 8 of 11
Case 4:21-cv-00020-AW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 9 of 11
Case 4:21-cv-00020-AW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 10 of 11
Case 4:21-cv-00020-AW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 11 of 11
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Zane Acquisition II, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
      Bettinger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      ss.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                    Steven Bettinger
                Steven
                  Bettinger
                  Principal
                    Executive Officer
                  Principal
                    Financial Officer
                  March
                    27, 2007
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03568
THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________
No. 95-50789 Summary Calendar

_______________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROY JUAREZ GODINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(SA-94-CR-295-(2))

_________________________________________________________________ August 29, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Godinez was sentenced to two 135-month

concurrent terms of imprisonment after a jury convicted him of

conspiracy to distribute and distribution of cocaine. On appeal,

his court-appointed counsel argues that Godinez’s offense level

should be reduced by two because the evidence was insufficient to

establish that Godinez was a manager in the offense. Attorney2

Padilla also asserts that Godinez urged him to argue the

sufficiency of e vidence to convict, but pursuant to A nders v.

California
, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), Padilla concludes that issue

is meritless. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

The status of manager under the Guidelines is reviewed in

this court for clear error. Based on the testimony of codefenda nts and the entirety of the transactions in which Godinez

was implicated, there is no error in the court’s finding that

Godinez was a manager. U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c).

Moreover, the evidence was sufficient to convict Godinez.

Even though much of the incriminating testimony was given by codefendants who had pleaded guilty at the time of Godinez’s trial,

t he jury was entitled to credit their testimony in whole or in

part. Confirmation of Godinez’s participation came from the

testimony of the undercover officer.

The court notes that court-appointed defense counsel

seems to have misunderstood the requirements of Anders in briefing

this appeal. A nders holds that after conscientiously reviewing the

record and identifying to the court any potential legal issues on

appeal, counsel may move to withdraw if he determines that an

appeal would be “wholly frivolous.” Anders , 368 U.S. at 744. If

counsel believes even one issue is meritorious, as he did here,

brie fing pursuant to A nders is not allowed. Notwithstanding

counsel’s err or in this case, the court was alerted to and did3

consider the sufficiency of the evidence as suggested by appellant

Godinez to his counsel. Counsel’s misinterpretation of Anders in

this case was harmless error at best.

AFFIRMED

.
```

[House Document 107-279]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

107th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 107-279

 
      CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO IRAN

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

NOTIFICATION THAT THE IRAN EMERGENCY DECLARED BY EXECUTIVE ORDER 12170 
ON NOVEMBER 14, 1979 IS TO CONTINUE BEYOND NOVEMBER 14, 2002, PURSUANT 
                          TO 50 U.S.C. 1622(d)

  November 12, 2002.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
     Committee on International Relations and ordered to be printed
To the Congress of the United States:
    Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 
1622(d)) provides for the automatic termination of a national 
emergency unless, prior to the anniversary date of its 
declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register 
and transmits to the Congress a notice stating that the 
emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. 
In accordance with this provision, I have sent the enclosed 
notice, stating that the Iran emergency declared by Executive 
Order 12170 on November 14, 1979, is to continue in effect 
beyond November 14, 2002, to the Federal Register for 
publication. The most recent notice continuing this emergency 
was published in the Federal Register on November 13, 2001, (66 
FR 56966).
    Our relations with Iran have not yet returned to normal, 
and the process of implementing the January 19, 1981, 
agreements with Iran is still underway. For these reasons, I 
have determined that it is necessary to continue the national 
emergency declared on November 14, 1979, with respect to Iran, 
beyond November 24, 2002.

                                                    George W. Bush.
    The White House, November 12, 2002.
                                 NOTICE

      Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Iran

    On November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, the 
President declared a national emergency with respect to Iran 
pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 
U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary 
threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of 
the United States constituted by the situation in Iran. Because 
our relations with Iran have not yet returned to normal, and 
the process of implementing the January 19, 1981, agreements 
with Iran is still underway, the national emergency declared on 
November 14, 1979, must continue in effect beyond November 14, 
2002. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the 
National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing 
for 1 year this national emergency with respect to Iran.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and 
transmitted to the Congress.

                                                    George W. Bush.
    The White House, November 12, 2002.


```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations
     and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such schedules.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                         296,847
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               688,319
<PP&E>                                         11,054,210
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,985,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,012,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          464,876
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,946,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,012,252
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,630,301
<CGS>                                          601,664
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  742,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (13,386)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             342,617
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (42,975)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (42,975)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (42,975)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (2.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.53)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Annual Report of Green Planet Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
  1. 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.
  Date:  February
      22, 2010By:
                /s/ Edmond,
      L. LonerganName: 
      Edmond, L. LonerganTitle: 
      Chief Executive Officer


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Green Planet Group,
Inc. and will be retained by Green Planet Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.