alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

THOMAS ALBERT SOSNOWSKI,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5780-MCR-HTC

SHANNON XEUREB, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

O R D E R

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on November 15, 

2020. ECF No. 16. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 16, is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

Case 3:20-cv-05780-MCR-HTC Document 20 Filed 01/04/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5780-MCR-HTC

2. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, ECF No. 14, is DISMISSED 

under 28 U.S.C. §1915A.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of January 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05780-MCR-HTC Document 20 Filed 01/04/21 Page 2 of 2
# 22.604 Exemptions.

- 22.604-1 Statutory exemptions. 
- 22.604-2 Regulatory exemptions. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 22.6 - Contracts for Materials, Supplies, Articles, and Equipment
#### § 3565.203 Restrictions on rents.

The rent for any individual housing unit, including any tenant-paid utilities, must not exceed an amount equal to 30 percent of 115 percent of area median income, adjusted for family size. In addition, on an annual basis, the average rent for a project, taking into account all individual unit rents, must not exceed 30 percent of 100 percent of area median income, adjusted for family size.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A1 58 2 . TI MOTHY A. TROUTMAN v

. REGI NALD CLARK.

Th i s cas e o ri g in at ed as an act i o n fo r d am ag es i n m a g i s trat e co u rt

. Ti m o t hy

Tro u t m an ap p eal ed t he m ag i s t rat e co u rt ’ s d eci si on t o t h e s t at e co u rt

, wh i ch en t ered

a ju dg m en t award i n g $ 2

, 6 0 0 t o Tro u t m an

. Tro u t m an t h en fi led a n o t ice o f ap p eal

fro m t h e t ri al co urt ’ s o rd er. W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n fo r t wo reas o n s

. F i r s t

, O C G A § 5

- 6

- 3 5 ( a ) ( 6 ) r e q u i r e s t h e f i l i n g o f a n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r

d i s cret i o n ary ap peal “ in al l act io n s fo r d am ag es i n w h i ch t h e j u d gm en t i s $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 .0 0

o r l es s .” Seco nd

, b ecau s e t h e o rd er at i s s u e d i sp o s es o f a d e n o vo ap p eal fro m a

m ag i s t rat e co u rt d eci s i o n , OCGA § 5-6 -3 5 (a) (1 ) al s o req u i red Tro u t m an t o fo l l o w

t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal p ro ced u res

. See En gl i s h v. Del b r i d g e , 2 16 Ga. Ap p

. 3 6 6,

3 6 7 (4 54 SE2 d 1 7 5 ) (1 9 9 5 ).

Tro u t m an ’ s fai l u re t o co m p l y wi t h d i s cret i o n ary ap peal p ro ced u res d ep ri v es u s

o f ju ri s d ict i o n o v er t hi s ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 05/14/2015 May 14, 2015
§ 58.238 Condensed storage tanks. ( a ) Excess production of condensed product over that which the dryer will take continuously from the pans should be bypassed through a cooler into a storage tank at 50 °F. or lower and held at this temperature until used.
( b ) Product cut-off points shall be made at least every 24 hours and the tank completely emptied, washed, and sanitized before reuse.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 74039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-2159-000]


Verso Maine Energy LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

November 22, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Verso Maine Energy LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is December 13, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f9bfbcabbab6979590979caa8c8989968b8db99f9c8b9ad79e968f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91d7d4c3d2defffdf8fff4c2e4e1e1fee3e5d1f7f4e3f2bff6fee7">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30031 Filed 11-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

SUPREME COURT CAUSE NO. 19-0307

GORDON WILLIAMS, GALE MADLER, 

TIMOTHY RUSSELL, JOYCE KELLEY,

and SAM BLAYLOCK,

Plaintiffs/Appellants,

vs.

STILLWATER BOARD OF COUNTY 

COMMISSIONERS,

Defendant/Appellee.

DA 19-0307

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED 

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

Upon stipulation of the parties pursuant to R. App. Proc. 16 (5), and good 

cause appearing, the above matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear 

their own fees and costs.

DATED AND ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BELOW

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 29 2020

07/29/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0307
#### § 51.630 Standard pack.

(a) Fruits shall be fairly uniform in size, unless specified as uniform in size. When packed in approved containers, fruit shall be arranged according to approved and recognized methods.

(b) “Fairly uniform in size” means that not more than 10 percent of fruit in any lot, and not more than double that amount in any sample, are outside the ranges of diameters given in Table 1 to this section:

Table 1 to [§ 51.630](/on/2024-09-16/title-7/section-51.630) to Paragraph (b)—7/10 Bushel Carton

| Pack size/Number of grapefruit | Diameter in inches | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Minimum | Maximum |
| 18 | 4-15/16 | 5-9/16 |
| 23 | 4-5/16 | 5 |
| 27 | 4-2/16 | 4-12/16 |
| 32 | 3-15/16 | 4-8/16 |
| 36 | 3-13/16 | 4-5/16 |
| 40 | 3-10/16 | 4-2/16 |
| 48 | 3-9/16 | 3-14/16 |
| 56 | 3-5/16 | 3-10/16 |
| 64 | 3 | 3-8/16 |

(c) “Uniform in size” means that not more than 10 percent of fruit in any lot, and not more than double that amount in any sample, may vary more than the following amounts:

(1) 32 size and smaller—not more than six-sixteenths inch in diameter; and

(2) 27 size and larger—not more than nine-sixteenths inch in diameter.

(d) In order to allow for variations, other than sizing, incident to proper packing, not more than 5 percent of the packages in any lot may fail to meet the requirements of standard pack.

[[85 FR 68424](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/85-FR-68424), Oct. 29, 2020]
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 1 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 2 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 3 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 4 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 5 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 6 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 7 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 8 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 9 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 10 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 11 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 12 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 13 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 14 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 15 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 16 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 17 of 18
Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/07/20 Page 18 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 1 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 2 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 3 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 4 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 5 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 6 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 7 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 8 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 9 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 10 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 11 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 12 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 13 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 14 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 15 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 16 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 17 of 18
Case 5:20-cv-00299-RH-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/04/20 Page 18 of 18
#### § 51.1445 Fairly well developed.

*Fairly well developed* means that the kernel is full-meated in over 50 percent of its width and length.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TEVIN THOMAS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 609 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Kohlberg Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report), I, Dayl W. Pearson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 22, 2012

          

          By:/s/ Dayl W. PearsonDayl W. PearsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Columbus Bar Association *v.*Wolfrom.

[Cite as *Columbus Bar Assn. v. Wolfrom*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 1.]

(No. 97-2634

Submitted May 13, 1998

Decided August 12, 1998.)

*2
      *Terry K. Sherman*and *Bruce A. Campbell,*for relator.

*Dennis W. McNamara,*for respondent.

*3
      *Per Curiam.*

Having reviewed the record, we adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Respondent is further ordered to make restitution for the unearned funds received from Griffith, Thompson, and Súber with statutory interest, and bring his child support obligations current with statutory interest and remain in compliance with those obligations. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### § 502.13 Weapons and explosives.

No person while in or on BARC property shall carry firearms, other dangerous or deadly weapons, or explosives, either openly or concealed, except as officially authorized for official purposes.

[61 FR 51212, Oct. 1, 1996]
II 

Calendar No. 45 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 244 

[Report No. 109–32] 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric 

project in the State of Wyoming. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2005 

Mr. THOMAS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

MARCH 10, 2005 

Reported by Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment 

A BILL 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project in the State of Wyoming. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 244 RS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE FEDERAL EN2 ERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION HYDRO3 ELECTRIC PROJECT. 

4 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 

5 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

6 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com7 mission project numbered 1651, the Commission may, at 

8 the request of the licensee for the project, and after rea9 sonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due dili10 gence, and public interest requirements of that section and 

11 the Commission’s procedures under that section, extend 

12 the time period during which the licensee is required to 

13 commence the construction of the project for 3 consecutive 

14 2-year periods from the date of the expiration of the exten15 sion originally issued by the Commission. 

Calendar No. 45 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 244 

[Report No. 109–32] 

A BILL 

To extend the deadline for commencement of conof Wyoming. struction of a hydroelectric project in the State 

MARCH 10, 2005 

Reported without amendment
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Income filed as part of Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
<CURRENCY>    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                              21,895
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      564,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                        26,176
<INVENTORY>                                        373,308
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,088,050
<PP&E>                                           1,921,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                     983,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,919,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              897,845
<BONDS>                                          1,706,537
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               646
<OTHER-SE>                                          48,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,919,642
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,760,736
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,591,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    51,664
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     4,239
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  33,784
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     61,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                        23,806
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 37,270
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        37,270
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .38



</TABLE>
#### § 51.34 Suspension or revocation of license of a licensed inspector.

Pending final action by the Secretary, the Administrator may, whenever he deems such action necessary, suspend the license of any licensed inspector issued pursuant to the regulations in this part by giving notice of such suspension to the respective licensee, accompanied by a statement of the reasons therefor. Within 10 days after the receipt of the aforesaid notice and statement of the reasons by such licensee, he may file an appeal, in writing, with the Secretary, supported by any argument or evidence that he may wish to offer as to why his license should not be suspended or revoked. After the expiration of the aforesaid 10-day period and consideration of such argument and evidence, the Secretary will take such action as he deems appropriate with respect to such suspension or revocation. When no appeal is filed within the prescribed 10 days, the license shall be automatically revoked.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2498 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the disclosure 

of tax return information by tax return preparers to third parties. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 4, 2006 

Mr. THOMAS (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. ENZI) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 

the disclosure of tax return information by tax return 

preparers to third parties. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF TAX PREPARERS DISCLOSING 

4 TAX RETURN INFORMATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 7216(b) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to regula7 tions) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(3) REGULATIONS.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) shall 

10 not apply to a disclosure or use of information 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 2498 IS

1 which is permitted by regulations prescribed by 

2 the Secretary under this section. 

3 ‘‘(B) PEER REVIEWS.—The regulations 

4 under this section shall permit (subject to such 

5 conditions as such regulations shall provide) the 

6 disclosure or use of information for quality or 

7 peer reviews. 

8 ‘‘(C) DISCLOSURE TO THIRD PARTIES.— 

9 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The regulations 

10 under this section shall not permit the dis11 closure or use of information for purposes 

12 of facilitating the solicitation of the tax13 payer’s use of any services provided or fa14 cilities furnished by a person unless— 

15 ‘‘(I) such person is a person de16 scribed in subsection (a) or a person 

17 who is a member of the same affili18 ated group (within the meaning of 

19 section 1504) as such person, and 

20 ‘‘(II) the taxpayer has granted 

21 consent to such disclosure or use. 

22 ‘‘(ii) SOLICITATION OF CONSENT.— 

23 The regulations under this section shall 

24 not permit any person described in clause 

25 (i)(I) to request the consent of a taxpayer 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•S 2498 IS

1 to disclose or use information for any pur2 pose other than a purpose described in 

3 clause (i).’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

6 of this Act. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
§ 51.3197 U.S. No. 2. *U.S. No. 2* consists of onions which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Similar varietal characteristics, except color when designated as a specialty or mixed pack;
( 2 ) Not soft or spongy.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Decay;
( 2 ) Wet sunscald; and,
( 3 ) Bottlenecks.
( c ) Free from serious damage caused by: ( 1 ) Seedstems;
( 2 ) Dry sunken areas;
( 3 ) Sprouting;
( 4 ) Staining;
( 5 ) Dirt or other foreign material;
( 6 ) Mechanical;
( 7 ) Watery scales;
( 8 ) Insects;
( 9 ) Disease; and,
( 10 ) Other means.
( d ) For size and tolerances see §§ 51.3198 and 51.3199.
[60 FR 46980, Sept. 8, 1995, as amended at 79 FR 63295, Oct. 23, 2014]
#### § 51.2558 Application of tolerances.

The tolerances for the grades apply to the entire lot and shall be based on a composite sample representative of the lot. Any container or group of containers which have kernels obviously different in quality or size from those in the majority of containers shall be considered a separate lot and shall be sampled separately.