alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2528 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2528

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Alkylketone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2006

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Alkylketone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALKYLKETONE.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

``      9902.10.66      1-(4-Chlorophenyl)- Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         4,4-dimethyl-3-                                                    31/2009
                         pentanone (CAS
                         No. 66346-01-8)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2914.70.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### §§ 4280.431-4280.433 [Reserved]
Subpart 42.9 - Bankruptcy

Parent topic: Part 42 - Contract Administration and Audit Services

42.900 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures regarding actions to be taken when a contractor

enters into proceedings relating to bankruptcy. It establishes a requirement for the contractor to

notify the contracting officer upon filing a petition for bankruptcy. It further establishes minimum

requirements for agencies to follow in the event of a contractor bankruptcy.

42.901 General.

The contract administration office shall take prompt action to determine the potential impact of a

contractor bankruptcy on the Government in order to protect the interests of the Government.

42.902 Procedures.

(a) When notified of bankruptcy proceedings, agencies shall, as a minimum-

(1) Furnish the notice of bankruptcy to legal counsel and other appropriate agency offices (e.g.,

contracting, financial, property) and affected buying activities;

(2) Determine the amount of the Government’s potential claim against the contractor (in assessing

this impact, identify and review any contracts that have not been closed out, including those

physically completed or terminated);

(3) Take actions necessary to protect the Government’s financial interests and safeguard

Government property; and

(4) Furnish pertinent contract information to the legal counsel representing the Government.

(b) The contracting officer shall consult with legal counsel, whenever possible, prior to taking any

action regarding the contractor’s bankruptcy proceedings.

42.903 Solicitation provision and contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.242-13, Bankruptcy, in all solicitations and

contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold.
44.000 Scope of part.       (a) This part prescribes policies and procedures for consent to subcontracts or advance notification of subcontracts, and for review, evaluation, and approval of contractors’ purchasing systems.                                          (b) The consent and advance notification requirements of subpart  44.2 are not applicable to prime contracts for commercial supplies or commercial services acquired pursuant to part  12.    **Parent topic:** Part 44 - Subcontracting Policies and Procedures
§ 51.752 U.S. No. 1. “U.S. No. 1” consists of grapefruit which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Discoloration: Not more than one-third of the surface, in the aggregate, may be affected by discoloration. (See § 51.770.);
( 2 ) Fairly smooth texture;
( 3 ) Fairly well colored;
( 4 ) Firm;
( 5 ) Mature;
( 6 ) Similar varietal characteristics; and,
( 7 ) Well formed.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Decay;
( 2 ) Unhealed skin breaks; and,
( 3 ) Wormy fruit.
( c ) Free from damage caused by: ( 1 ) Ammoniation;
( 2 ) Bruises;
( 3 ) Buckskin;
( 4 ) Caked melanose;
( 5 ) Dirt or other foreign material;
( 6 ) Disease;
( 7 ) Dryness or mushy condition;
( 8 ) Green spots;
( 9 ) Hail;
( 10 ) Insects;
( 11 ) Oil spots;
( 12 ) Scab;
( 13 ) Scale;
( 14 ) Scars;
( 15 ) Skin breakdown;
( 16 ) Sprayburn;
( 17 ) Sprouting;
( 18 ) Sunburn;
( 19 ) Thorn scratches; and,
( 20 ) Other means.
( d ) For tolerances see § 51.760.
#### WILSON v. J. HARRY HAFF CO. et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 18, 1914.)

Negligence (§ 134*)—Injuries to Travelers—Evidence.

In an action for injuries to plaintiff while walking along a sidewalk by being struck by a sugar barrel rolled along a skid from a truck to the sidewalk, evidence *held*insufficient to connect defendant, or any of its employes, with the occurrence, and therefore not to sustain a verdict against it.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Negligence, Cent. Dig. §§ 267-270, 272, 273; Dec. Dig. § 134.*]

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term.

Action by Carrie Wilson against' the J. Harry Haff Company and the Ragus Tea Sr Coffee Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Ragus Tea & Coffee Company appeals.

Reversed, and new trial ordered.

Argued June term, 1914, before SEABURY, BIJUR, and PAGE, JJ.

Bertrand L. Pettigrew, of New York City (Walter R. Glenney, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

James A. Donegan, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

PAGE, J.

Plaintiff was injured through being struck by a sugar barrel which was being rolled or slid along a skid to the sidewalk from the truck of the Haff Company for delivery to the Ragus Company.

The defendant Ragus Company rested on the plaintiff’s case. The plaintiff herself did not see the persons who lowered the barrel. The driver of the wagon was not produced, nor his absence explained. Haff, the proprietor of the Haff Company, testified that he saw the accident from the opposite side of the street; that two laborers were assisting in"the removal of the barrels; but that he was unable to identify either. The only witness produced by plaintiff who knew what had happened were: (a) Piersanti, a peddler with a push-cart, who testified that he occasionally helped generally about' defendant’s place in return for their allowing him to peddle in front thereof. He said that he had been helping to remove barrels from this truck, but, at the time when this barrel was being moved, he was selling tomatoes from his push-cart to a customer, and that he saw this barrel roll and *279that the driver of the truck rolled it to the skid and let it go. (b) Anderson, a “checker” of defendant, who testified that PTrsanti was four feet away from the truck when this barrel came down. He thought that Piersanti was about to wait upon a customer at that time.

There being no testimony in the case from which the jury could connect defendant or any of its employés with the occurrence, the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
§ 5001.503 REAP RES or EEI project completion requirements. Once a REAP RES or EEI project has been completed, the lender or borrower is required to submit the applicable project performance report as identified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section by January 31 each year. ( a ) *Renewable energy systems.* For RES projects, commencing the first full calendar year following the year in which project construction was completed and continuing for three full years, the borrower must provide an outcome project performance certification noting that either the system has or has not performed at the steady state operating level as described in the technical report filed with the REAP guaranteed loan application, and whether projected jobs created or saved have occurred. If it has not performed as intended, a report detailing the circumstances affecting performance must be provided to the Agency along with the actual energy production of the system (in BTUs, kilowatt-hours, or similar energy equivalents) and the actual number of jobs created or saved as a direct result of the RES project for which guaranteed loan funds were used.
( b ) *Energy efficiency improvements.* For EEI projects, commencing the first full calendar year following the year in which project construction was completed and continuing for two full years, the borrower must provide an outcome project performance certification noting that either the energy efficiency improvements have or have not been utilized at or above the projected operating levels as described in the technical report filed with the REAP guaranteed loan application, and whether projected jobs created or saved have occurred. If it has not performed as intended, a report detailing the circumstances affecting performance must be provided to the Agency along with the actual energy savings of the system and the actual number of jobs created or saved as a direct result of the EEI project for which guaranteed loan funds were used.
```

ERNST & YOUNG          ERNST & YOUNG LLP                  Phone: (619) 343-1000
                       220 South Sixth Street, Ste 1400   www.ey.com
                       Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509

             Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S.
Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's
Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform (the
Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria
1122(d)(1)(i), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(i), through 1122(d)(2)(vii),
1122(d)(3)(i) through 1122 (d)(3)(iv) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) through (d)(4)(xv),
which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed
by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and servicing
activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company
processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities
in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were
limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the
Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or
subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report
for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2006 for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated,
in all material respects.

                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

February 26, 2007

0703-0810457      A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3047]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


National Center for Injury Prevention and Control/Initial Review 
Group, (NCIPC/IRG)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
review group:
    Time and Date: 12:30 p.m.-4 p.m., March 3, 2010 (closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5, 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and 
Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463.
    Purpose: This group is charged with providing advice and guidance 
to the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, and the 
Director, CDC, concerning the scientific and technical merit of grant 
and cooperative agreement applications received from academic 
institutions and other public and private profit and nonprofit 
organizations, including State and local government agencies, to 
conduct research that will build the scientific base for the prevention 
of unintentional poisonings from drug overdoses in the adult 
population.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications intended to encourage 
exploratory/developmental research in unintentional childhood injury. 
Requests for Applications are related to the following individual 
research announcement: CE10-002 Unintentional Poisoning from 
Prescription Drug Overdoses in Adults (R21).
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: J. Felix Rogers, PhD, M.P.H., 
Telephone (770) 488-4334, NCIPC, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mail 
Stop F63, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724. The Director, Management 
Analysis and Services Office has been delegated the authority to sign 
Federal Register notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and 
other committee management activities for both CDC and the Agency for 
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: February 4, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-3047 Filed 2-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### § 4288.132 Payment adjustments.

The Agency will adjust the payments otherwise payable to the advanced biofuel producer if there is a difference between the amount actually produced and the amount determined by the Agency to be eligible for payment.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30427]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Cancellation of Customs Broker License

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: General notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
(19 U.S.C. 1641) and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection regulations 
(19 CFR 111.45), the following Customs broker license and all 
associated permits are revoked with prejudice.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         License
                 Name                      No.         Issuing  port
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Foreign Cargo Customs Brokers, Inc....     15965  New York
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: November 29, 2010.
Daniel Baldwin,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2010-30427 Filed 12-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
,

(

**OFFICE OF**  **THE A-ITORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

Hon. A. J. Luokett County Attorney coma1 County New Hreunfels, Texas Dear Sir:

the department'sopinion on the f

.?I8there a closed a 0r oatfieh,inCornal count is the closed masonp

.- 'we.hve c ale 952,qlld

952x+, aU .~endnWkf4 '.tbers ,$&&;~;,"

~'. >. Ii&i'

3t.q +wmk'- 169, p. 2TQ;~qnd by the pla$n pro* rhioh aeationerka request and.'Artlprovided that~

the posaeesionof 'anytmkle, the ime & nhioh is prohlhdted~bythe provisions of 'thisdot, within two handred (200) yards of tiny fresh waters in the Countiesnamed hereln,~e&il~ betpry facie evidence of tha v,lolation of this 0Hon. A. J. Luokett,p. 2

Wee. 2. It shall be unlawful in the Counties of San Saba, Gillespie,Blanco, Kendall,Kerr, Comal, Llano, Mason, Kimble or Pal Verde to sell, offer for sale or have In possessionfor the purw pose of sale any black bass, crappie, catfish,or sunfish,commonly calledperch., "Sec. 3, No person, firm or corporations or their agents shall take, catch or **have** in their possessionany black bass, perch or orappie taken from any fresh waters in said Counties from the 1st day of March to the 1st day o.f May of any year or to have in possessionat any time any black bass of less length than eleven (11) inohes, any.oatfish of less length than nine (9) Inches or any orapple (common1 seven (T calledwhite perch) of less length than

v inches." Seo. 4 prescribesa penalty for violationof any of thoprovisions oi said article.

The above quoted seotlonsmake it unlawful to have .~$nposaession

at any t&ke?any catfish of,less, length than nixi&(9) inches* taken from any of the fresh waters of. **Comei countY** * We have found no statutemaking it Ulawfnl tom thM& datoh,'orhave in possessionat any time oatfish oZ? nine lnohes; or more in length taken from the fTesh waters of said county.

The 1943 amendment,oh. 169, is in no way pertinent .toyour inquiry. It deals with an entlrely.dfffe.rent~subject. Its purpose is to permit.thesale or barter o<: catfish and other named species of fish' taken from the rresh waters of coma1 oountyo It, of course, 'does not amend the above quoted sectionsof Art. 95261, inhibiting the possesslonof catfish less than nine lnohes in length+ Yours very truly ATTORWEY

GXNERAL

OF TBZAS

BY b/ David Wuntoh DW:db:bb Assistant APPROVEDMAR. 19, 1944 /a/ 0. P. Blackburn ACTING ATTOKNEY GE- OF T&AS AFFRovED cPIN1ONcOMWITTEE DT- A.W., Chairman.
#### The People of the State of New York v Yolanda Mercado.

Motion to dismiss appeal without prejudice denied. The appeal is, *sua sponte,*dismissed with prejudice (see *People v Casiel,*33 NY2d 791). Concur —Birns, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.
#### § 51.642 Damage.

*Damage* means any specific defect described in Table 1 to § 51.652; or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which materially detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the fruit.

[85 FR 68424, Oct. 29, 2020]
# 32.202-2           Types of payments for commercial product and commercial service purchases.       

These definitions incorporate the requirements of the statutory commercial financing authority and the implementation of the Prompt Payment Act.

*Commercial advance payment*, as used in this section, means a payment made before any performance of work under the contract. The aggregate of these payments *shall* not exceed 15 percent of the contract price. These payments are *contract financing payments* for prompt payment purposes (*i.e.,* not subject to the interest penalty provisions of the Prompt Payment Act in accordance with subpart  32.9). These payments are not subject to subpart  32.4, Advance Payments for Other Than Commercial *Acquisitions*.          

**Commercial interim payment** (see 32.001).

**Delivery payment** (see 32.001).

**Parent topic:**32.202 General.
#### MING GAO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-5030-ag.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Aug. 29, 2007.

*60Gary J. Yerman, New York, NY, for Petitioner.

Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Emily Anne Rad-ford, Assistant Director, Vanessa 0. Le-fort, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

PRESENT: Hon. PIERRE N. LEVAL, Hon. ROSEMARY S. POOLER, Hon. RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Ming Gao, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of an October 5, 2006, order of the BIA affirming the May 31, 2005, decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Matthew J. D’Angelo denying Gao’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). *In re Ming Gao,*No. [ AXX XXX XXX ] (B.I.A. Oct. 5, 2006), *aff'g*No. [ AXX XXX XXX ] (Immig. Ct. Conn. May 31, 2005). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case.

Because Gao does not meaningfully address her fear of torture upon her return in her petition before this Court, it is deemed waived. *See Yueqing Zhang v. Gonzales,*426 F.3d 540, 545 n. 7 (2d Cir. 2005).

With respect to asylum and withholding of removal, Gao argues that the IJ erred in several of the findings underlying his adverse credibility finding. With one exception, Gao did not adequately exhaust these issues before the BIA. We generally will not consider an unexhausted issue on appeal, especially where the government—as it does here—objects to consideration on exhaustion grounds. *See Lin Zhong v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*480 F.3d 104, 107 n. 1 (2d Cir.2007). Further, while we may consider “specific, subsidiary legal *61arguments or arguments by extension” that were not raised below, the unexhausted arguments here are insufficiently related to the skeletal issues raised in Gao’s brief to the BIA for us to consider them. *See Gill v. INS,*420 F.3d 82, 86 (2d Cir.2005).

Gao did argue before the BIA and before this court that the IJ failed to consider certain evidence of her identity before finding that she had not established her identity. We agree, but we believe that remand would be futile because even setting aside this erroneous credibility finding, the IJ’s unexhausted findings constitute substantial evidence in support of his adverse credibility finding and we can confidently predict that the IJ would reach the same result on remand. *See Xiao Ji Chen v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*471 F.3d 315, 338-39 (2d Cir.2006).

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED. Having completed our review, we DENY Gao’s motion for a stay of removal as moot.
#### § 58.312 Churn rooms.

Churn rooms in addition to proper construction and sanitation shall be so equipped that the air is kept free from objectionable odors and vapors and extreme temperatures by means of adequate ventilation and exhaust systems or air conditioning and heating facilities.
#### § 51.2291 Rancidity.

*Rancidity* means that the portion of kernel is noticeably rancid to the taste. Rancidity should not be confused with a slightly astringent flavor of the pellicle (skin) or with staleness (the state at which the flavor is flat but not objectionable).