alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as the Principal financial officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jeffrey B. ReedyJeffrey B. ReedyChief Financial OfficerNovember 15, 2010
#### ADAMS v. MASSEY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 10, 1906.)

Action by Jesse M. Adams, as administrator, against George B. Massey.

No opinion. Motion to amend order heretofore made and entered by this court denied, with $10 costs.
# L_2013277EN.01000101.xml

| 18.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 277/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 277/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 996/2013

of 17 October 2013

amending for the 205th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al Qaida network

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al-Qaida network, (1) and in particular Article 7(1)(a) and 7a(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 8 October 2013 the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) decided to remove one entity from its list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 8 October 2013 the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) decided to remove one entity from its list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be updated accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be updated accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 October 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments

---

(1)  
  OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9.

1

---

ANNEX

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as follows:

The following entry under the heading ‘Legal persons, groups and entities’ is deleted:

‘Sanabel Relief Agency Limited (alias (a) Sanabel Relief Agency (b) Sanabel L'il-Igatha, (c) SRA, (d) Sara, (e) Al-Rahama Relief Foundation Limited). Address: (a) 63 South Rd, Sparkbrook, Birmingham B 111 EX, United Kingdom (b) 1011 Stockport Rd, Levenshulme, Manchester M9 2TB, United Kingdom (c) P.O. Box 50, Manchester M19 25P, United Kingdom (d) 98 Gresham Road, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom (e) 54 Anson Road, London NW2 6AD, United Kingdom. Other information: (a) charity number: 1083469, (b) registration number: 3713110. Date of designation referred to in Article 2a (4) (b): 7.2.2006.’

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

DAVID POSCHMANN, 

 

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 3:20cv5893-MCR-HTC 

 

v. 

 

NEWMAN-DAILEY RESORT 

PROPERTIES, INC., 

 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

Plaintiff, David Poschmann, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby 

informs the court that the parties have reached a resolution of all issues in this 

action and are in the process of finalizing the written settlement agreement. 

Dated: December 22, 2020. 

 s/Lee D. Sarkin 

 Drew M. Levitt, Esq. 

 drewmlevitt@gmail.com 

 Florida Bar No.782246 

 Lee D. Sarkin, Esq. 

 Lsarkin@aol.com 

 Florida Bar No. 962848 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 4700 NW Boca Raton Blvd. 

Suite 302 

 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 

 Telephone (561) 994-6922 

 Facsimile (561) 994-0837 

 

 

Case 3:20-cv-05893-MCR-HTC Document 10 Filed 12/22/20 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 22, 2020, I electronically filed the 

foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that 

the forgoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se 

parties identified on the Service List below in the manner specified, either via 

transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some 

other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to 

receive electronically, Notices of Electronic Filing. 

 s/Lee D. Sarkin 

 LEE D. SARKIN, ESQ. 

SERVICE LIST 

Kielan Saborit, Esq. 

ksm@lydeckerdiaz.com 

Stephanie Piderman, Esq. 

sp@lydeckerdiaz.com 

Lydecker Diaz 

1221 Brickell Ave, 19th Floor 

Miami, FL 33131-3240 

Attorneys For Defendant 

Via CM/ECF 

Case 3:20-cv-05893-MCR-HTC Document 10 Filed 12/22/20 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Anthony M., a Child Alleged to be Abandoned. Carmelo M., Appellant; Abbott House, Respondent.

[815 NYS2d 80]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Douglas Hoffman, J.), entered on or about November 5, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, upon findings of *405abandonment, terminated respondent father’s parental rights and committed custody and guardianship of the subject child to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and petitioner agency for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Clear and convincing evidence that respondent had no contact with the child or the agency during the six months preceding the filing of the petition raised a presumption of abandonment, which he failed to rebut (Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [b]; [5] [a]; *see Matter of Anthony M.,*195 AD2d 315 [1993]). The court did not err in declining to conduct a dispositional hearing with respect to respondent *(see Matter of Israel R.,*200 AD2d 498, 499 [1994]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
50.205-1 SAFETY Act Considerations.       (a)                   *SAFETY Act applicability*. Requiring activities should review requirements to identify potential technologies that prevent, detect, identify, or deter acts of terrorism or limit the harm such acts might cause, and may be appropriate for SAFETY Act protections. In questionable cases, the agency shall consult with DHS. For acquisitions involving such technologies, the requiring activity should ascertain through discussions with DHS whether a block designation or block certification exists for the technology being acquired.                                                         (1) 								                If one does exist, the requiring activity should request that the contracting officer notify offerors.                                                            (2) 								                If one does not exist, see 50.205-2, Pre-qualification designation notice.                                                                             (b)                   *Early consideration of the SAFETY Act*. Acquisition officials shall consider SAFETY Act issues as early in the acquisition cycle as possible (see 7.105(b)(20)(v)). Normally, this would be at the point where the required capabilities or performance characteristics are addressed. This is important because the processing times for issuing determinations on all types of SAFETY Act applications vary depending on many factors, including the influx of applications to DHS and the technical complexity of individual applications.                                          (c)                   *Industry outreach*. When applicable, acquisition officials should include SAFETY Act considerations in all industry outreach efforts including, but not limited to, requests for information, draft requests for proposal, and industry conferences.                                          (d)                   *Reciprocal waiver of claims*. For purposes of 6 CFR 25.5(e), the Government is not a customer from which a contractor must request a reciprocal waiver of claims.    **Parent topic:** 50.205 Procedures.
#### § 3419.1 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Capacity funds* means agricultural extension and research funds provided by formula to the eligible institutions under sections 1444 and 1445 of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (NARETPA), as amended, or under sections 3(b) and (c) of the Smith-Lever Act, 7 U.S.C. 343(b) and (c) or under section 3 of the Hatch Act of 1887, 7 U.S.C. 361c.

*Eligible institution* means a college or university eligible to receive funds under the Act of August 30, 1890 (7 U.S.C. 321 *et seq.*) (commonly known as the Second Morrill Act), including Central State University, Tuskegee University, and West Virginia State University (1890 land-grant institutions), and a college or university designated under the Act of July 2, 1862 (7 U.S.C. 301, *et seq.*) (commonly known as the First Morrill Act) and located in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the insular areas of American Samoa, Guam, Micronesia, Northern Marianas, and the U.S. Virgin Islands (1862 land-grant institutions in insular areas).

*Matching funds* means funds from non-Federal sources, including those made available by the State to the eligible institutions, for programs or activities that fall within the purposes of agricultural research and cooperative extension under: sections 1444 and 1445 of NARETPA; the Hatch Act of 1887; and the Smith-Lever Act.

*Non-Federal sources* means funds made available by the State to the eligible institution either through direct appropriation or under any authority (other than authority to charge tuition and fees paid by students) provided by a State to an eligible institution to raise revenue, such as gift acceptance authority or user fees.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture and any other officer or employee of the Department of Agriculture to whom the authority involved may be delegated.

*State* means the government of any one of the fifty States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of Northern Marianas, the Virgin Islands of the United States, the Republic of Palau, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Federated States of Micronesia.

[65 FR 21631, Apr. 21, 2000, as amended at 83 FR 21849, May 11, 2018]
June 30, 2011

MEMORANDUM

From: William H. Maxwell EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01)

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Subject: Meeting with DTE Energy and CMS Energy

Attendees :

Renze Hoeksema, DTE Energy Tony Earley, DTE Energy Amy Plaster, CMS Energy John Russell, CMS Energy Gina McCarthy, EPA/OAR Joe Goffman, EPA/OAR Laura Vaught, EPA/OA/OCIR Lorie Schmidt, EPA/OAR/OPAR Sam Napolitano, EPA/OAR/CAMD

Discussion :

A general discussion of the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards was held.
#### § 3560.556 Application requirements and processing.

Off-farm loans and grants will be available under a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) that will be published in the Federal Register each fiscal year.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6693

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

EUGENE BARNES,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, 

District Judge. (1:11-cr-00023-IMK-1)

Submitted: July 29, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Barnes appeals the district court’s order denying 

his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of 

sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Barnes, No. 1:11-cr-00023-IMK1 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 25, 2015). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
19.705-2 Determining the need for a

subcontracting plan.

The contracting officer shall take the following actions to determine whether a proposed contractual

action requires a subcontracting plan:

(a)

(1) Determine whether the proposed total contract dollars will exceed the subcontracting plan

threshold in 19.702(a).

(2) Determine whether a proposed modification will cause the total contract dollars to exceed the

subcontracting plan threshold (see 19.702(a)).

(b) Determine whether subcontracting possibilities exist by considering relevant factors such as-

(1) Whether firms engaged in the business of furnishing the types of items to be acquired

customarily contract for performance of part of the work or maintain sufficient in-house capability to

perform the work; and

(2) Whether there are likely to be product prequalification requirements.

(3) Whether the firm can acquire any portion of the work with minimal or no disruption to

performance (with consideration given to the time remaining until contract completion), and at fair

market value, when a determination is made in accordance with paragraph (a)(2).

(c) If it is determined that there are no subcontracting possibilities, the determination shall include a

detailed rationale, be approved at a level above the contracting officer, and placed in the contract

file.

(d) In solicitations for negotiated acquisitions, the contracting officer may require the submission of

subcontracting plans with initial offers, or at any other time prior to award. In determining when

subcontracting plans should be required, as well as when and with whom plans should be

negotiated, the contracting officer must consider the integrity of the competitive process, the goal of

affording maximum practicable opportunity for small business, veteran-owned small business,

service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged

business, and women-owned small business concerns to participate, and the burden placed on

offerors.

(e) A contract may not have more than one subcontracting plan. However, a contracting officer may

establish separate subcontracting goals for each order under an indefinite-delivery, indefinitequantity contract (19.705-1(b)(2)). When a contract modification exceeds the subcontracting plan

threshold (see 19.702(a)) or an option is exercised, the goals of an existing subcontracting plan shall

be amended to reflect any new subcontracting opportunities not envisioned at the time of contract

award. These goal changes do not apply retroactively.

(f) If a subcontracting plan has been added to the contract due to a modification (see

19.702(a)(1)(iii)) or a size re-representation (see 19.301-2(e)), the subcontracting goals apply from

the date of incorporation of the subcontracting plan into the contract and the contractor's
achievements must be reported on the ISR (or the SF-294, if applicable) on a cumulative basis from

the date of incorporation of the subcontracting plan into the contract.

Parent topic: 19.705 Responsibilities of the contracting officer under the subcontracting assistance

program.
52.222-1 Notice to the Government of Labor

Disputes.

As prescribed in 22.103-5(a), insert the following clause:

Notice to the Government of Labor Disputes (Feb 1997)

If the Contractor has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to

delay the timely performance of this contract, the Contractor shall immediately give notice,

including all relevant information, to the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION BY CEO AND CFO PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





CERTIFICATION





The undersigned hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 of BNL FINANCIAL CORPORATION (the “Company”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to BNL FINANCIAL CORPORATION and will be retained by BNL FINANCIAL CORPORATION and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This Certification is not “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification is not incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

















Date:  May 14, 2010


/s/ Wayne E. Ahart


Name:  Wayne E. Ahart


Titles:  Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer











Date:  May 14, 2010


/s/ Barry N. Shamas




Titles:  Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer







E5
#### § 52.57 Compliance with other laws.

None of the requirements in the regulations in this part shall excuse failure to comply with any Federal, State, county, or municipal laws applicable to the operation of food processing establishments and to processed food products.
41.101 Definitions.       As used in this part,          *Areawide contract* means a contract entered into between the General Services Administration (GSA) and a utility service supplier to cover utility service needs of Federal agencies within the franchise territory of the supplier. Each areawide contract includes an "Authorization" form for requesting service, connection, disconnection, or change in service.          *Authorization* means the document executed by the ordering agency and the utility supplier to order service under an areawide contract.          *Connection charge* means all nonrecurring costs, whether refundable or nonrefundable, to be paid by the Government to the utility supplier for the required connecting facilities, which are installed, owned, operated, and maintained by the utility supplier (see Termination liability).          *Delegated agency* means an agency that has received a written delegation of authority from GSA to contract for utility services for periods not exceeding tenyears (see 41.103(b)).          *Federal Power and Water Marketing Agency* means a Government entity that produces, manages, transports, controls, and sells electrical and water supply service to customers.          *Franchise territory* means a geographical area that a utility supplier has a right to serve based upon a franchise, a certificate of public convenience and necessity, or other legal means.          *Intervention* means action by GSA or a delegated agency to formally participate in a utility regulatory proceeding on behalf of all Federal executive agencies.          *Multiple service locations* means the various locations or delivery points in the utility supplier’s service area to which it provides service under a single contract.          *Rates* may include rate schedules, riders, rules, terms and conditions of service, and other tariff and service charges, *e.g.,* facilities use charges.          *Separate contract* means a utility services contract (other than a GSA areawide contract, an Authorization under an areawide contract, or an interagency agreement), to cover the acquisition of utility services.          *Termination liability* means a contingent Government obligation to pay a utility supplier the unamortized portion of a connection charge and any other applicable nonrefundable service charge as defined in the contract in the event the Government terminates the contract before the cost of connection facilities has been recovered by the utility supplier (see "Connection charge").          *Utility service* means a service such as furnishing electricity, natural or manufactured gas, water, sewerage, thermal energy, chilled water, steam, hot water, or high temperature hot water. The application of part  41 to other services (*e.g.,* rubbish removal, snow removal) may be appropriate when the acquisition is not subject to the 41 U.S.C. chapter 67, Service Contract Labor Standards (see 37.107).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 41.1 - General
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          20,840
<SECURITIES>                                     2,685
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,214
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,625
<INVENTORY>                                     14,352
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               181,372
<PP&E>                                         426,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                 115,571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 755,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          146,023
<BONDS>                                        490,916
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       224,472
<OTHER-SE>                                    (171,003)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   755,876
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,490
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                66,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,164
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,541
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,373
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,168
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,168
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
#### § 51.1171 Misshapen.

*Misshapen* means that the fruit is decidedly elongated, pointed or flatsided.
#### § 4280.443 Grant monitoring and servicing.

RBDG grants will be monitored and serviced in accordance with the grant agreement, this subpart, and 2 CFR chapter IV.