alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014048EN.01000801.xml

| 19.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 48/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 48/8

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

of 20 November 2013

on the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument

(2014/94/EU)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (1), and in particular point 27 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas, after having examined all possibilities for re-allocating appropriations under heading 1b, it appears necessary to mobilise the Flexibility Instrument to complement the financing in the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, beyond the ceiling of heading 1b, of EUR 134 049 037 towards the financing of the European Social Fund to increase the allocations to France, Italy and Spain for the year 2013 by a total amount of EUR 150 000 000,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, the Flexibility Instrument shall be used to provide the sum of EUR 134 049 037 in commitment appropriations in heading 1b.

That amount shall be used to complement the financing of the European Social Fund under heading 1b.

Article 2

This decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Strasbourg, 20 November 2013.

For the European Parliament

The President

M. SCHULZ

For the Council

The President

V. LEŠKEVIČIUS

---

(1)  
  OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

1

---
§ 58.346 Whipped butter. ( a ) The quality requirements for whipped butter shall be in accordance with the U.S. Standards for Grades of Whipped Butter for U.S. Grade AA and U.S. Grade A, respectively.
( b ) Whipped butter shall also be subject to the following specifications when sampled and tested in accordance with § 58.336 and § 58.337, respectively: ( 1 ) Proteolytic count, not more than 50 per gram; yeast and mold count, not more than 10 per gram; coliform count, not more than 10 per gram; and keeping-quality test, satisfactory after 7 days at 72 °F.
( 2 ) Optional except when required or requested: Copper content, not more than 0.3 ppm; iron content, not more than 1.0 ppm; enterococci, not more than 10 per gram.
[59 FR 1264, Jan. 10, 1994, as amended at 67 FR 48976, July 29, 2002]
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DRAYTON HARBOR RESOURCES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bhupinder Singh Malhi, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: April 9, 2008
|-------------------

|By: Name:
Title: | /s/ Rogel Gregario Rogel Gregario
Treasurer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer
|---------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
# 42.709 Penalties for Unallowable Costs.

- 42.709-1 Scope. 
- 42.709-2 General. 
- 42.709-3 Responsibilities. 
- 42.709-4 Assessing the penalty. 
- 42.709-5 Computing Interest. 
- 42.709-6 Waiver of the penalty. 
- 42.709-7 Contract clause. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 42.7 - Indirect Cost Rates
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 5:99cr15-SPM

STEVE DANIELS,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER TERMINATING SUPERVISED RELEASE

This cause comes for consideration of Defendant Steve Daniels’ Motion to

Terminate Supervised Release (doc. 1590). Defendant has been on supervised

release for more than one year, during which time he has complied with all

conditions. The probation office and the Government were advised of the motion. 

Probation has no objection to the requested relief and the Government takes no

position. Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section § 3583(e) and

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(c)(2)(B), it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s Motion to Terminate

Supervised Release (doc. 1590) is granted. Defendant’s term of supervised

release is terminated and Defendant is discharged.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of August, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 5:99-cr-00015-SPM-MD Document 1591 Filed 08/18/05 Page 1 of 1
#### § 58.5 Where service is offered.

Subject to the provisions of this part, inspection or grading service may be performed when a qualified inspector or grader is available, and when the facilities and conditions are satisfactory for the conduct of the service.
§ 4280.27 Ineligible purposes. Zero-Interest Loans may not be used: ( a ) For activities that would adversely affect the environment, or activities that limit the choice of reasonable alternatives prior to satisfying Rural Development environmental requirements;
( b ) To pay off or refinance any existing indebtedness or costs of the Project that were incurred prior to Rural Development receipt of the Intermediary's completed application;
( c ) For any electric or telecommunications purpose or for the Intermediary's electric or telecommunications operations, for affiliated operations of the Intermediary, or for the benefit of other Intermediaries or their affiliated operations, except those purposes contained in § 4280.15(f);
( d ) To pay the salaries of any employee or owner of the Intermediary, its subsidiaries, or affiliates, except for salaries incurred in administering a Revolving Loan Fund established under the REDG Program;
( e ) For community antenna or cable television systems or facilities;
( f ) For residential purposes such as residential dwellings and land sites; facilities to provide entertainment television; to transfer property between owners without making improvements that will promote or sustain economic development in Rural Areas; or for personal, non-business related vehicles;
( g ) Where there is directly or indirectly a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest in the Project; for Intermediaries this would include a situation in which the Intermediary, its officers, managers, Board of Directors, employees, their spouses, children, or close relatives, have a financial or ownership interest in the Project being funded, including its construction or development;
( h ) For any purpose when receipt of loan funds is conditioned upon the requirement that the Ultimate Recipient acquire electric or telecommunications service from the Intermediary or its affiliates;
( i ) For any gambling activity;
( j ) For a Project that would result in the transfer of existing employment or business activity more than 25 miles from its existing location;
( k ) For proposed Projects located in areas covered by the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3501-3510);
( l ) For any illegal activity or any activity involving prostitution;
( m ) For Agricultural Production, except where the Project is a farmer-owned cooperative or similar organization where the benefits of the Project are passed on to the farmer-owners, and the Agricultural Production is part of an integrated business that processes the agricultural products, and the Agricultural Production portion of the loan will not exceed 50% of the loan amount;
( n ) For any pass-through Grant funding activity (a Grant by the Intermediary to the Ultimate Recipient);
( o ) Provision of only local exchange voice telephone service; or
( p ) for any other purpose announced in a notice by Rural Development. This will not affect Grants that have already been awarded.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2648 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber tow. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2006 

Mr. THOMAS (for himself and Mr. ENZI) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber 

tow. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC FIBER TOW. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 2648 IS 

‘‘ 9902.11.11 Acrylic fiber tow 

(polyacrylonitrile tow) containing by weight a minimum of 92 percent acrylonitrile, not more than 0.1 

percent zinc and from 4 to 8 

percent water, imported in 

the form of from 1 to 12 

sub-bundles crimped together, each containing 

24,000 filaments (plus or 

minus 0.06 percent) and 

with average filament denier 

of 1.5 decitex (plus or minus 

0.08 percent) (provided for 

in subheading 5501.30.00) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
§ 51.759 U.S. No. 3. “U.S. No. 3” consists of grapefruit which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Mature;
( 2 ) Misshapen;
( 3 ) Poorly colored;
( 4 ) Rough texture, not seriously bumpy;
( 5 ) Similar varietal characteristics; and,
( 6 ) Slightly spongy.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Decay;
( 2 ) Unhealed skin breaks; and,
( 3 ) Wormy fruit.
( c ) Free from very serious damage caused by: ( 1 ) Ammoniation;
( 2 ) Bruises;
( 3 ) Buckskin;
( 4 ) Caked melanose;
( 5 ) Disease;
( 6 ) Dryness or mushy condition;
( 7 ) Hail;
( 8 ) Insects;
( 9 ) Oil spotting;
( 10 ) Scab;
( 11 ) Scale;
( 12 ) Scars;
( 13 ) Skin breakdown;
( 14 ) Sprayburn;
( 15 ) Sprouting;
( 16 ) Sunburn; and,
( 17 ) Other means.
( d ) For tolerances see § 51.760.
2013 Electric Integrated 

Resource Plan 

Appendix C – 2013 Electric IRP 

Avista Electric Conservation 

Potential Assessment Study 

579
#### CHEMICAL OVERSEAS HOLDINGS, INC., Credit Suisse First Boston, Dresdner Bank Lateinamerika AG, Petitioners-Appellees, v. REPUBLICA ORIENTAL DEL URUGUAY, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 05-4068-CV.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 14, 2006.

Lawrence G. McMichael, Virginia H. McMichael, Holly R. Rogers, Dilworth Paxon LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Respondent-Appellant.

Henry Weisberg, Shearman & Sterling LLP, Louis, B. Kimmelman, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, NY, for Petitioners-Appellees.

PRESENT: Hon. RALPH K. WINTER, Hon. ROSEMARY S. POOLER,* Circuit Judges.

*

 Hon. Guido Calabresi, Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, who was originally assigned to this appeal, has recused himself.

SUMMARY ORDER

Respondent-appellant República Oriental del Uruguay (“Uruguay”) appeals from the March 25, 2005 judgment of the district court confirming an arbitration award between the parties. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on appeal.

An Uruguayan court has entered an order attaching the credit owed to appellees under their agreement with Uruguay. Uruguay argues that, in light of the Uruguayan court’s order, the district court should not have confirmed the arbitration award because it should have afforded the Uruguayan order international comity and because not according the order international comity would violate public policy. “In reviewing a district court’s confirmation of an arbitral award, we review legal issues de novo and findings of fact for clear error.” *Pike v. Freeman,*266 F.3d 78, 86 (2d Cir.2001).

We need not resolve the issue raised by Uruguay because, here, there is no actual conflict between confirmation of the arbitration award and the Uruguayan attachment order. Unlike in *Sea Dragon, Inc. v. Gebr. Van Weelde Scheepvaartkantoor B.V.,*574 F.Supp. 367 (S.D.N.Y.1983), relied on by Uruguay, the arbitration award does not direct present payment. In this case, the confirmation of the arbitration award specifically stated that there could be no execution of the award without further order of the court. Thus, confirmation of the award did not require immediate payment by Uruguay, the only action *7that might have conflicted with the attachment order. It is also unclear that the attachment order actually directed Uruguay not to pay the debt the order assumes it owes appellees. The property that is actually attached in this case is the credit possessed by appellees, not the money held by Uruguay. Therefore, public policy did not require the district court to refuse to confirm the arbitration award.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Uruguay’s motion to supplement the record is DENIED. Appellees’ request for an award of reasonable attorneys fees incurred in this appeal is GRANTED and appellees are direct to submit affidavits demonstrating time spent.
11.204 Solicitation provisions.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.211-1, Availability of Specifications Listed

in the GSA Index of Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions, FPMR

Part 101-29, in solicitations that cite specifications listed in the Index that are not furnished with the

solicitation.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.211-2, Availability of Defense

Specifications, Standards, and Data Item Descriptions in the Acquisition Streamlining and

Standardization Information System (ASSIST) website, in solicitations that cite specifications

available in ASSIST that are not furnished with the solicitation.

(c) The contracting officer shall insert a provision substantially the same as the provision at

52.211-3, Availability of Specifications Not Listed in the GSA Index of Federal Specifications,

Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions, in solicitations that cite specifications that are not

listed in the Index and are not furnished with the solicitation, but may be obtained from a designated

source.

(d) The contracting officer shall insert a provision substantially the same as the provision at

52.211-4, Availability for Examination of Specifications Not Listed in the GSA Index of Federal

Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions, in solicitations that cite specifications

that are not listed in the Index and are available for examination at a specified location.

Parent topic: Subpart 11.2 - Using and Maintaining Requirements Documents
52.222-10 Compliance with Copeland Act

Requirements.

As prescribed in 22.407(a), insert the following clause:

Compliance with Copeland Act Requirements (Feb 1988)

The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of 29 CFR Part 3, which are hereby incorporated

by reference in this contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC   Document 90   Filed 05/20/22   Page 1 of 5

Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC   Document 90   Filed 05/20/22   Page 2 of 5

Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC   Document 90   Filed 05/20/22   Page 3 of 5

Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC   Document 90   Filed 05/20/22   Page 4 of 5

Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC   Document 90   Filed 05/20/22   Page 5 of 5
#### § 51.1277 Fairly well formed.

*Fairly well formed* means that the pear may be slightly abnormal in shape but not to an extent which detracts materially from the appearance of the fruit.
Philip McNeely, Maricopa County Air Quality Department. 

Thank you for coming to Phoenix. Maricopa County covers over 9,000 square 

miles and has over 4 million residents. We are the 14th largest county in size 

and the 4th most populated county in the United States. 

The Air Quality Department's mission is to provide clean air to Maricopa 

County Residents. We are committed to our mission and have made great 

progress with improving the air quality in the county. 

However, we still have work to do. The county is in nonattainment for 8-hr 

ozone and is proposed to be bumped-up to "moderate". We are also classified 

as a "serious" nonattainment area for PM-10. EPA has determined that the 

Maricopa PM-10 Nonattainment Area attained the standard as of December 

31, 2012 and approved our Five Percent Plan. 

This plan included 53 measures and relied on the cooperation of the state, 

county, cities and towns, private sector and public. The plan includes stringent 

control measures including a unique public outreach program that encourages 

the public to participate in a notification program to receive five-day forecasts 

and notification using rea l time data when PM-10 levels are rising at a monitor. 

Even though the county has a clean data finding, the region continues to 

experience ha boobs and other violent dust storms . The exceptional event rule 

was critical to the attainment demonstration and rema ins critica l to dealing 

w ith significant dust storms. 

Our department appreciates and supports many of EPA's proposed revisions to 

this rule. At this time, we are still analyzing the proposed rule and the 

associated technica l materials, as w ell as consulting with MAG and ADEQ. We 

do plan on providing additional written comments and recommendations 

during t he public comment period. 

Finally, we also support Senator Flake's request to extend the comment period 

to allow for a more thorough review of this complex proposed rule.
§ 51.3064 Damage. *Damage* means any defect which materially affects the appearance, or the edible or shipping quality of the individual fruit, or the general appearance of the avocados in the container. Any one of the following defects, or any combination of defects the seriousness of which exceeds the maximum allowed for any one defect, shall be considered as damage: ( a ) Cuts or other skin breaks when not healed and penetrating beneath the epidermis or the aggregate area exceeds that of a rectangle 1 inch in length and one-eighth inch in width, or when healed and the appearance is materially affected;
( b ) Pulled stems when the exposed stem cavity is excessively deep, or when skin surrounding the stem cavity is more than slightly torn;
( c ) Russeting or similar discoloration when the appearance of the avocado is affected to a greater extent than that of an avocado which has light brown surface discoloration aggregating 10 percent of the fruit surface;
( d ) Scars or scab when the appearance of the avocado is affected to a greater extent than that of an avocado which has light brown superficial, fairly smooth scars aggregating 10 percent of the fruit surface;
( e ) Sunburn when the appearance of the avocado is affected to a greater extent than that of an avocado which has greenish-yellow colored sunburn aggregating 10 percent of the fruit surface; and,
( f ) Sunscald or sprayburn when not well healed, or when soft, or when the appearance of the avocado is affected to a greater extent than that of an avocado which has light brown, superficial scars aggregating 10 percent of the fruit surface.
36.501 Performance of work by the contractor.       (a) To assure adequate interest in and supervision of all work involved in larger projects, the contractor shall be required to perform a significant part of the contract work with its own forces. The contract shall express this requirement in terms of a percentage that reflects the minimum amount of work the contractor must perform with its own forces. This percentage is (1) as high as the contracting officer considers appropriate for the project, consistent with customary or necessary specialty subcontracting and the complexity and magnitude of the work, and (2) ordinarily not less than 12 percent unless a greater percentage is required by law or agency regulation. Specialties such as plumbing, heating, and electrical work are usually subcontracted, and should not normally be considered in establishing the amount of work required to be performed by the contractor.                                          (b) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-1, Performance of Work by the Contractor, in solicitations and contracts, except those awarded pursuant to subparts  19.5, 19.8, 19.13, 19.14, or 19.15 when a fixed-price construction contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed $1.5 million. The contracting officer may insert the clause in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to be $1.5 million or less.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
§ 614.7 Preliminary technical determinations. ( a ) A preliminary technical determination is limited to those determinations made pursuant to the HELC/WC provisions (16 U.S.C. 3801, *et seq.*) and becomes final 30 days after the participant receives the decision, unless the participant files an appeal with the appropriate NRCS official as indicated in the decision notice requesting: ( 1 ) Reconsideration with a field visit, office visit, or other designated location meeting site in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section; or
( 2 ) Mediation as set forth in § 614.11.
( b ) ( 1 ) If the participant requests reconsideration with a field visit, office visit, or other location visit, the designated conservationist, participant, and at the option of the conservation district, a district representative will make a field or office visit for the purpose of gathering additional information and discussing the facts relating to the preliminary technical determination. The participant may also provide any additional documentation to the designated conservationist.
( 2 ) Within 15 days of the field or office visit, the designated conservationist, based upon the agency record as supplemented by the field visit and any participant submissions, will reconsider his or her preliminary technical determination.
( 3 ) If the reconsidered determination is no longer adverse to the participant, the designated conservationist will issue the reconsidered determination as a final technical determination.
( 4 ) If the preliminary technical determination remains adverse, then the designated conservationist will forward the revised decision and agency record to the State Conservationist for a final determination pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, unless further appeal is waived in writing by the participant in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
( c ) The State Conservationist will issue a final technical determination to the participant as soon as is practicable after receiving the reconsideration and agency record from the designated conservationist. The technical determination issued by the State Conservationist becomes a final NRCS technical determination upon receipt by the participant. Receipt triggers the running of the 30-day timeframe to appeal to NAD, or if applicable, to the FSA county committee.
( d ) In order to address application needs or resource issues on the ground immediately (expedited finality), a participant may waive, in writing to the State Conservationist, the reconsideration rights stated in paragraph (a) of this section so that a preliminary technical decision becomes final before the expiration of the 30-day appeal period.
#### § 58.522 Reconstituting nonfat dry milk.

Nonfat dry milk shall be reconstituted in a sanitary manner.