alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMicrogravity research at LeRCThe NASA Lewis Research Center is conducting a wide variety of ground-based science and microgravity flight experiments in the disciplines of fluid physics and transport phenomena, combustion science, and materials science. Extensive use is made of low-gravity ground-based facilities such as drop towers and a Learjet aircraft, as well as extensive normal-gravity laboratories. The ground-based facilities are utilized to execute science programs, perform precursor tests to define space experiment science requirements and conceptual designs, and also to perform tests for space experiment technology development and verification. Finally, flight hardware is designed, developed and flown on the Space Shuttle.Document ID19910015151Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsKohl, Fred J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryMaterials ProcessingReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102521NAS 1.15:102521E-5325Meeting InformationMeeting: CSME Mechanical Engineering Forum 1990Location: Toronto, OntarioCountry: CanadaStart Date: June 3, 1990End Date: June 9, 1990Sponsors:Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringAccession Number91N24464Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 674-29-05Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910015151.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JAY ALAN MEEKS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-171-AW-GRJ

SECRETARY, DEP’T OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Having considered the magistrate judge’s September 1, 2020 Report and 

Recommendation (ECF No. 5), and having considered de novo the Petitioner’s 

objections (ECF No. 6), I now conclude the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted. The Report and Recommendation is incorporated into this order. The clerk 

will enter a judgment that says, “The § 2254 petition is dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction.” The clerk will then close the file.

SO ORDERED on October 20, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00171-AW-GRJ Document 7 Filed 10/20/20 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 57

#### Editorial Note:

1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

#### § 57.10 Administration.

The Administrator shall perform, for and under the supervision of the Secretary such duties as the Secretary may require in the enforcement or administration of the provisions of the act and the regulations in this part. The Administrator is authorized to waive for limited periods any particular provisions of the regulations in this part to permit experimentation so that new procedures, equipment, grading, inspection, and processing techniques may be tested to facilitate definite improvements and at the same time to determine full compliance with the spirit and intent of the regulations in this part. The AMS and its officers and employees shall not be liable in damages through acts of commission or omission in the administration of this part.

[69 FR 57166, Sept. 24, 2004]
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:98cr126 LAC

MICHAEL A. BLANKENSHIP

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on JULY 15, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION TO DISMISS THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RELIEF 

FROM JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 60(B) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE (Document #263) 

 

Filed by GOVERNMENT on6/23/08 Doc.# 264

RESPONSES:

BY DEFENDANT on7/14/08 Doc.# 268

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 18th day of

July, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED. MOOT.

(b) Defendant’s motion (doc 263) was denied (doc 267). 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:98-cr-00126-LC-MD Document 269 Filed 07/18/08 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                             943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (207)
<INVENTORY>                                        444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,878
<PP&E>                                             167
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,948
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,200
<PREFERRED>                                        750
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,961
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,122
<SALES>                                         17,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,445
<CGS>                                           16,732
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  71
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    264
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (27)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       291
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
#### § 4279.222 Payments.

A Lender will receive all payments of principal and Interest on account of the entire loan and must promptly remit to the Holder its Pro Rata share of any payment within 30 days of the Lender's receipt thereof from the Borrower, determined according to its respective interest in the loan, less only the Lender's servicing fee.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ERIC BURT,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 4:03-CV-308-SPM

JAMES CROSBY,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND DISMISSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the magistrate judge's report

and recommendation (doc. 16) dated June 8, 2005. The parties have been

furnished a copy and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. No

objections were filed.

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have

determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 16) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 4:03-cv-00308-SPM-AK Document 17 Filed 07/08/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

4:03-CV-308-SPM/AK

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 7) is hereby

denied.

3. This case is dismissed with prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this eighth day of July, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

/pao

Case 4:03-cv-00308-SPM-AK Document 17 Filed 07/08/05 Page 2 of 2
(December 20, 1966)

#### Samuel C. Dretzin, Appellant, v. Ernest S. Alson et al., Respondents.

Appeal from order entered October 7, 1966, directing plaintiff to appear for continuation of examination dismissed, with $30 costs and disbursements to the respondents, on the ground that no substantial right was affected (CPLR 5701, subd. [a], par. 2 [v]). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens, and Steuer, JJ.
4 

Case 4:20-cv-00425-AW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/31/20 Page 1 of 2
1:52 

<• 

•• ~? . .... / 

Sasha Martin 

Student Life & 

Academic Affairs 

1:16PM 

If you feel comfortable sharing this on your 

social media platforms I encourage you to 

do so. We want to create a positive and 

safe space for everyone involved. 

Exhibit 4, Page 001 

Case 4:20-cv-00425-AW-MAF Document 1-4 Filed 08/31/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 51.3411 Usable piece. “Usable Piece” means that portion of the potato remaining after trimming, or as it occurs in the sample: ( a ) Not have any unusable material;
( b ) Unless otherwise specified, weigh at least 4 ounces; and,
( c ) Must have at least 50% of peel remaining after trimming.
#### § 27.52 Delivery without certification.

If upon the date fixed for delivery in accordance with subsection 15b(f) of the Act cotton class certificates shall not have been issued by a Marketing Services Office for cotton to be delivered pursuant to such notice, samples of which cotton shall have been in the custody of the Marketing Services Office for the time hereinafter prescribed, the delivery of such cotton may be made upon compliance with and subject to the conditions specified in §§ 27.52 through 27.55. Sections 27.52 through 27.55 shall not apply to cotton upon which a Marketing Services Office has already issued cotton class certificates pursuant to this subpart.

[48 FR 49212, Oct. 25, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 47707, Nov. 20, 1985]
#### § 3419.4 Applications for waivers for both 1890 land-grant institutions and 1862 land-grant institutions in insular areas.

Application for waivers for both 1890 land-grant institutions and 1862 land-grant institutions in insular areas. The president of the eligible institution must submit any request for a waiver for matching requirements. A waiver application must include the name of the eligible institution, the type of Federal capacity funds (*i.e.* research, extension, Hatch, etc.), appropriate fiscal year, the basis for the request (*e.g.* one or more of the criteria identified in § 3419.3); current supporting documentation, where current is defined as within the past two years from the date of the letter requesting the waiver; and the amount of the request.

[83 FR 21849, May 11, 2018]
Exhibit 

32.2 

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Entremetrix Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, George Lefevre, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge andbelief: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all	material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the	Company.

| Dated: May 17, 2005 |  By: /s/ George Lefevre               |
|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|           |        George Lefevre, Chief Financial		Officer                                    |
§ 51.2647 U.S. Commercial. “U.S. Commercial” consists of sweet cherries which meet the requirements for the U.S. No. 1 grade except for minimum diameter and except for increased tolerances. ( a ) *Size.* Unless otherwise specified, the diameter of each cherry shall be not less than five-eighths inch. The maximum diameter of the cherries in any lot may be specified in accordance with the facts.
( b ) For tolerances see § 51.2648.
Case 5:20-cv-00306-TKW-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/13/20 Page 1 of 12
Case 5:20-cv-00306-TKW-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/13/20 Page 2 of 12
Case 5:20-cv-00306-TKW-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/13/20 Page 3 of 12
Case 5:20-cv-00306-TKW-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/13/20 Page 4 of 12
Case 5:20-cv-00306-TKW-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/13/20 Page 5 of 12
Case 5:20-cv-00306-TKW-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/13/20 Page 6 of 12
Case 5:20-cv-00306-TKW-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/13/20 Page 7 of 12
Case 5:20-cv-00306-TKW-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/13/20 Page 8 of 12
Case 5:20-cv-00306-TKW-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/13/20 Page 9 of 12
Case 5:20-cv-00306-TKW-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/13/20 Page 10 of 12
Case 5:20-cv-00306-TKW-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/13/20 Page 11 of 12
Case 5:20-cv-00306-TKW-MJF Document 1 Filed 11/13/20 Page 12 of 12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

TAMICA L. JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 4:20cv407-MW/MAF

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

HIGHWAY SAFETY AND 

MOTOR VEHICLES,

Defendant.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 23. Plaintiff has filed a demand for an evidentiary 

hearing but no objections, and she has failed to file an amended pleading on the 

required form. Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED

for failure to comply with a court order and for want of prosecution.” Plaintiff’s 

Case 4:20-cv-00407-MW-MAF Document 25 Filed 03/15/21 Page 1 of 2
2

petition for evidentiary hearing, ECF No. 24, is DENIED as moot. The Clerk shall 

close the file. 

SO ORDERED on March 15, 2021.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00407-MW-MAF Document 25 Filed 03/15/21 Page 2 of 2
22.001 Definitions.

Administrator or "Administrator, Wage and Hour Division," as used in this part, means the—

Administrator

Wage and Hour Division

U.S. Department of Labor

Washington, DC 20210

or an authorized representative.

Agency labor advisor means an individual responsible for advising contracting agency officials on

Federal contract labor matters.

e98 means the Department of Labor’s approved electronic application ( https://www.sam.gov ),

whereby a contracting officer submits pertinent information to the Department of Labor and

requests a Service Contract Labor Standards statute wage determination directly from the Wage

and Hour Division.

Service contract means any Government contract, or subcontract thereunder, the principal purpose

of which is to furnish services in the United States through the use of service employees, except as

exempted by 41 U.S.C. chapter 67, Service Contract Labor Standards; see 22.1003-3 and

22.1003-4). See 22.1003-5 and 29 CFR 4.130 for a partial list of services covered by the Service

Contract Labor Standards statute.

Service employee means any person engaged in the performance of a service contract other than

any person employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity, as those

terms are defined in 29 CFR part 541. The term "service employee" includes all such persons

regardless of any contractual relationship that may be alleged to exist between a contractor or

subcontractor and such persons.

Wage Determinations at SAM.gov means the Government internet website for both Construction

Wage Rate Requirements statute and Service Contract Labor Standards statute wage

determinations available at https://www.sam.gov.

Parent topic: Part 22 - Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF      BNL FINANCIAL CORPORATION**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

|   |   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with                the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | 2. | The                information contained in this                Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition                and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[House Report 107-780]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-780

======================================================================

 
 WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY S. 
        1214, MARITIME TRANSPORTATION ANTITERRORISM ACT OF 2002

                                _______
                                

 November 13, 2002.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 605]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 605, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany S. 1214, the Maritime 
Transportation Antiterrorism Act of 2002, and against its 
consideration. The rule further provides that the conference 
report shall be considered as read.


```
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 10
- 00041
- CV
LEWIS LAPAUL FULSOM AND PAULINE FULSOM, AS NEXT OF FRIEND , Appellant s v. MEXIA INDEPENDENT SC HOOL DISTRICT , Appellee

From the 87th District Court Limestone County, Texas Trial Court No. 29,040
- B

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Lewis LaPaul Fulsom and his mother, Pauline Fulsom, filed a lawsuit in May of 2009 against various entities and individuals. After being issued a criminal trespass warning , which prohibited Fulsom from entering on Mexia Independe nt School District property, Fulsom amended his petition and sued MISD for abuse of process. MISD filed a plea to the jurisdiction contending it was immune from Fulsom’s abuse of process claim. The plea was granted, and Fulsom appeals. We affirm.Fulsom v. Mexia ISD Page 2

Wheth er a pleader has alleged facts that affirmatively demonstrate a trial court's subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law reviewed de novo. Tex. Dep't of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda , 133 S.W.3d 217, 226 (Tex. 2004). While sovereign immunity refers to the immunity from suit and liability of the State and the various divisions of state government, governmental immunity protects political subdivisions of the State, including school districts. See Wichita Falls State Hosp. v. Taylor , 106 S.W.3d 692, 69 4 n.3 (Tex. 2003); Huntsville Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Briggs , 262 S.W.3d 390, 392 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2008, pet. denied). For school districts, the Texas Tort Claims Act’s waiver of governmental immunity is narrow, encompassing only tort claims involving the use or operation of motor vehicles. T EX
. C IV
. P RAC

. & R EM
. C ODE
A NN . § 101.051 (Vernon 2005); Mission Consolidated , 253 S.W.3d at 656; Briggs , 262 S.W.3d at 392. Further, governmental units are immune from intentional torts. T EX
. C IV
. P RAC

. & R EM
. C ODE A NN . § 101.057 (Vernon 2005). Fulsom sued MISD for abuse of process , which is an intentional tort. See Dillard's, Inc. v. Newman , 299 S.W.3d 144 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2008, pet. denied); Harris
v. Francis , No. 05

- 99

- 00866

- CV, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 1067 (Tex. A pp. — Dallas Feb. 16, 2000, no pet.). Because the Texas Tort Claims Act does not waive immunity for intentional torts, MISD was entitled to immunity. Further, because Fulsom did not allege that his claim against MISD involved the use or operation of a moto r vehicle, MISD was entitled to immunity. Accordingly, the trial court did not err in granting MISD’s plea to the jurisdiction.Fulsom v. Mexia ISD Page 3

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed September 22, 2010 [CV06]
Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 13 Filed 02/02/21 Page 1 of 5
Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 13 Filed 02/02/21 Page 2 of 5
Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 13 Filed 02/02/21 Page 3 of 5
Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 13 Filed 02/02/21 Page 4 of 5
Case 4:20-cv-00545-WS-MJF Document 13 Filed 02/02/21 Page 5 of 5