alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 5001.504 Financial reports. ( a ) The lender must obtain the borrower's and any guarantor's financial statements required by this part and the loan agreement. The Agency may require an annual audited financial statement based on a project's circumstances. States, local government, Indian tribes, institution of higher education, and nonprofit organization borrowers who meet the Federal awards expended threshold established in 2 CFR part 200, subpart F, “Audit Requirements,” during their fiscal year must submit an audit conducted in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart F.
( b ) The lender must submit financial statements obtained under this section to the Agency within 120 days of the end of the borrower's fiscal year. When the borrower's audit is conducted in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart F, audits must be submitted no later than nine months after the end of the borrower's fiscal year or 30 days after the borrower's receipt of the auditor's report, whichever is earlier. If a lender makes reasonable documented attempts to obtain financial statements but is unable to obtain the borrower's (or guarantor's) cooperation, the failure to obtain financial statements does not impair the validity of the loan note guarantee.
( c ) Annual financial statements must be in accordance with accounting practices acceptable to the Agency as prescribed in § 5001.9 for all borrowers with a guaranteed loan balance in excess of $600,000. The lender may determine the type and frequency of financial statements for borrowers with a total guaranteed loan balance below $600,000 upon notification and justification to the Agency. This section does not supersede the borrower financial statement requirements of 2 CFR part 200, subpart F.
( d ) The lender must analyze the financial statements obtained under paragraph (a) of this section and provide the Agency with a financial analysis including a credit evaluation of trends, strength and weaknesses, ratio analysis, and conclusions, plus any extraordinary transactions; borrower violations of loan covenants and covenant waivers proposed by the lender, any routine servicing actions performed; and other indications of the financial condition of the borrower.
( e ) Following the Agency's review of the lender's financial analysis, the Agency will notify the lender in writing of any concerns. The lender must address each concern identified in the Agency's findings by the due date stated in the correspondence.
( f ) The lender should routinely confirm the outstanding principal balance of a guarantee held by a holder to avoid any discrepancy and delay in reconciliation in the event of a lender or Agency repurchase of the guaranteed loan from a holder in accordance with § 5001.511.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 1:00cr15-SPM

WILLIAM H. BLACK,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes before the Court for consideration of Defendant William

H. Black’s letter (doc. 1204), which has been treated as a motion for copy of

sealed document. In the letter, Defendant requests that the Court send a copy of

a sealed document to Attorney Robert Bragdon. Upon contacting Attorney

Robert Bragdon, the Court was advised that a copy from the Court is no longer

needed. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion (doc. 1204) is denied as

moot. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of July, 2006.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 1:00-cr-00015-MW-GRJ Document 1205 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 1
§ 52.3753 Styles of canned ripe olives. ( a ) *Whole.* “Whole” olives are those which have not been pitted.
( b ) *Pitted.* “Pitted” olives are those from which pits have been removed.
( c ) *Halved.* “Halved” olives are pitted olives in which each olive is cut lengthwise into two approximately equal parts.
( d ) *Segmented.* “Segmented” olives are pitted olives in which each olive is cut lengthwise into three or more approximately equal parts.
( e ) *Sliced.* “Sliced” olives consist of parallel slices of fairly uniform thickness prepared from pitted olives.
( f ) *Chopped.* “Chopped” olives are random-size cut pieces or cut bits prepared from pitted olives.
( g ) *Broken pitted.* “Broken pitted” olives consist substantially of large pieces that may have been broken in pitting but have not been sliced or cut.
| 1. | The Bank is Trustee under the Trust Agreement. |
|----|------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Trust Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trust. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | A review of the Trustee’s activities during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2010 and of its performance under the Trust Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout such twelve-month period. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Janet O'Hara |   |
|--------|------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Janet O'Hara     |   |
| Title: | Vice President   |   |

----

----
33.201 Definitions.       As used in this subpart-          *Accrual of a claim* means the date when all events, that fix the alleged liability of either the Government or the contractor and permit assertion of the claim, were known or should have been known. For liability to be fixed, some injury must have occurred. However, monetary damages need not have been incurred.          *Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)* means any type of procedure or combination of procedures voluntarily used to resolve issues in controversy. These procedures may include, but are not limited to, conciliation, facilitation, mediation, fact-finding, minitrials, arbitration, and use of ombudsmen.          *Defective certification* means a certificate which alters or otherwise deviates from the language in 33.207(c) or which is not executed by a person authorized to bind the contractor with respect to the claim. Failure to certify shall not be deemed to be a defective certification.          *Issue in controversy* means a material disagreement between the Government and the contractor that-(1) May result in a claim; or                                                                     (2) Is all or part of an existing claim.                         *Misrepresentation of fact* means a false statement of substantive fact, or any conduct which leads to the belief of a substantive fact material to proper understanding of the matter in hand, made with intent to deceive or mislead.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 33.2 - Disputes and Appeals
#### CALVIN, Respondent, v. NESBITT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

June 1, 1906.)

Action by Margaret E. Calvin against Earl Nesbitt, as trustee, etc.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
47.207-1 Qualifications of offerors.       (a)                   *Operating authorities*. The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-2, Permits, Authorities, or Franchises, when regulated transportation is involved. The clause need not be used when a Federal office move is intrastate and the contracting officer determines that it is in the Government’s interest not to apply the requirement for holding or obtaining State authority to operate within the State.                                          (b) 						            Performance capability for Federal office moving contracts.                                                         (1) 								                The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-3, Capability to Perform a Contract for the Relocation of a Federal Office, when a Federal office is relocated, to ensure that offerors are capable to perform interstate or intrastate moving contracts involving the relocation of Federal offices.                                                            (2) 								                If a Federal office move is intrastate and the contracting officer determines that it is in the Government’s interest not to apply the requirements for holding or obtaining State authority to operate within the State, and to maintain a facility within the State or commercial zone, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its AlternateI.                                                                             (c)                   *Inspection of shipping and receiving facilities*. The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.247-4, Inspection of Shipping and Receiving Facilities, when it is desired for offerors to inspect the shipping, receiving, or other sites to ensure realistic bids.                                          (d)                   *Familiarization with conditions*. The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-5, Familiarization with Conditions, to ensure that offerors become familiar with conditions under which and where the services will be performed.                                          (e)                   *Financial statement*. The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.247-6, Financial Statement, to ensure that offerors are prepared to furnish financial statements.    **Parent topic:** 47.207 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and special requirements.
#### Floran Yagoda, Respondent, v Charles L. Yagoda, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 8, 1979, which awarded a counsel fee of $1,250 to plaintiffs attorney to be used in opposing defendant’s appeal from a prior order modifying the child support provisions in a judgment of divorce. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remanded to Special Term for a *de novo*hearing to determine the relative financial circumstances of the parties so as to permit a proper allocation of the counsel fee of $1,250. Special Term decided to award counsel fees in the matter solely on conflicting affidavits and written statements of financial worth. In the light of the holdings in *Orr v Orr*(440 US 268) and *Childs v Childs*(69 AD2d 406), we deem it necessary that a hearing be held to do justice between the contending parties. Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
23.206 Contract clause.       Unless exempt pursuant to 23.204, insert the clause at 52.223-15, Energy Efficiency in Energy-Consuming Products, in solicitations and contracts when energy-consuming products listed in the ENERGY STAR® Program or FEMP will be-                                       (a) 						            Delivered;                                          (b) 						            Acquired by the contractor for use in performing services at a Federally-controlled facility;                                          (c) 						            Furnished by the contractor for use by the Government; or                                          (d) 						            Specified in the design of a building or work, or incorporated during its construction, renovation, or maintenance.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 23.2 - Energy and Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy
#### § 56.68 Debarment.

The acts or practices set forth in §§ 56.69 through 56.74, or the causing thereof, may be deemed sufficient cause for the debarment by the Administrator of any person, including any agents, officers, subsidiaries, or affiliates of such person, from all benefits of the act for a specified period. The Rules of Practice Governing Formal Adjudicatory Proceedings (7 CFR part 1, subpart H) shall be applicable to such debarment action.

[71 FR 42011, July 24, 2006]
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

AdolescentsAggressionChildrenComputer GamesComputer Software EvaluationDemographyElementary Secondary EducationMass Media EffectsParent RoleRating ScalesSelf ConceptSex DifferencesVideo GamesViolence

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

SCOTTIE LEE WHITE, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D13-6132 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

___________________________________ ) 

Opinion filed August 27, 2014. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pasco County; Linda Babb, Judge. 

Scottie Lee White, pro se. 

NORTHCUTT, Judge. 

 We affirm the postconviction court's denial of Scottie Lee White's petition 

for writ of habeas corpus, which the court appropriately treated as an untimely motion 

filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. White claimed that the trial court 

committed fundamental error when it gave an erroneous instruction on voluntary 

manslaughter, citing State v. Montgomery, 39 So. 3d 252, 257-58 (Fla. 2010). We write 

only to observe that the postconviction court properly rejected this contention on the 

ground that the Montgomery case does not apply retroactively to cases that were final 
 -2-

before it issued. See Mendoza v. State, 93 So. 3d 458, 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); 

Harricharan v. State, 59 So. 3d 1162, 1163 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). 

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
Maddox
Ungar Silberstein, PLLCCPAs
and Business
Advisors


Phone
(248) 203-0080


Fax (248)
281-0940


30600
Telegraph Road, Suite 2175


Bingham
Farms, MI 48025-4586


www.maddoxungar.com














November
27, 2009





To the
Board of Directors of


Atheron,
Inc.


Makati
City 1235, Philippines





To Whom
It May Concern:





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Maddox
Ungar Silberstein, PLLC, hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual
Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, filed by
Atheron, Inc. of our report dated November 27, 2009, relating to the financial
statements of Atheron, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, for the periods ending August
31, 2009 and 2008.





Sincerely,





/s/
Maddox Ungar Silberstein, PLLC


Maddox
Ungar Silberstein, PLLC
#### The State ex rel. Patterson, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Patterson v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 544.]

(No. 97-1844

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided November 10, 1998.)

*Daniel D. Connor Co., L.P.A., Daniel D. Connor*and *Kenneth S. Hafenstein,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Steve P. Dlott,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*545The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for relief pursuant to *State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm.*(1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
#### § 58.9 Form of application.

Each application for inspection or grading service shall include such information as may be required by the Administrator in regard to the type of service; kind of products and place of manufacture, processing, or packaging: and location where service is desired.
§ 51.2833 U.S. No. 1 Boilers. *U.S. No. 1 Boilers* consists of onions which meet all the requirements for the U.S. No. 1 grade except for size. (See § 51.2830.) Size: The diameter of onions of this grade shall be not less than 1 inch nor more than 17 ⁄ 8 inches. (See § 51.2837.)
§ 301.76-8 Compliance agreements and cancellation. ( a ) Any person involved in the growing, maintaining, processing, handling, packing, treating, or moving of regulating articles from areas quarantined for citrus greening or Asian citrus psyllid may enter into a compliance agreement when an inspector determines that the person understands this subpart, agrees to comply with its provisions, and agrees to comply with all the provisions contained in the compliance agreement. The person must also agree to maintain and offer for inspection such records as are necessary to demonstrate continual adherence to the requirements of the regulations and the provisions of the compliance agreement.[1]
( b ) Any compliance agreement may be canceled, either orally or in writing, by an inspector whenever the inspector finds that the person who has entered into the compliance agreement has failed to comply with this subpart, or any term or condition of the compliance agreement itself. If the cancellation is oral, the cancellation and the reasons for the cancellation will be confirmed in writing as promptly as circumstances allow. Any person whose compliance agreement has been canceled may appeal the decision, in writing, within 10 days after receiving written notification of the cancellation. The appeal must state all of the facts and reasons upon which the person relies to show that the compliance agreement was wrongly canceled. As promptly as circumstances allow, the Administrator will grant or deny the appeal, in writing, stating the reasons for the decision. A hearing will be held to resolve any conflict as to any material fact. Rules of practice concerning a hearing will be adopted by the Administrator.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 0579-0363 and 0579-0369) [75 FR 34332, June 17, 2010, as amended at 76 FR 23457, 23459, Apr. 27, 2011; 77 FR 59712, Oct. 1, 2012; 87 FR 80011, Dec. 29, 2022] Footnotes -
301.76-8
[1] Compliance agreement forms are available without charge from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Domestic and Emergency Operations, 4700 River Road Unit 134, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236, and from local offices of the Plant Protection and Quarantine offices, which are listed in telephone directories.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                          Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            Sep-30-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<CASH>                                         1219
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8538
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                     822
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              13423
<PP&E>                                        95770
<DEPRECIATION>                                32642 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                79964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         19594
<BONDS>                                       16160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        217
<OTHER-SE>                                    33528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  79964
<SALES>                                       23909
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              23909
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 24853
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1759)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (573)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1186)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1177)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION




I, James
C. Robison, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Animal Health International,
Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;




(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors:




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




/s/
      James C. Robison
              James
      C. Robison
              Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive
Officer




September 9,
2008