UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934

              For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT


             For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14099


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
        (Exact Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in Its Charter)



         California                                              94-2940204
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the  registrant  was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  X   No ___

                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     Financial Statements


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                               September 30, 2004

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $ 36
   Receivables and deposits                                                      27
   Other assets                                                                 138
   Investment property:
      Land                                                    $ 916
      Buildings and related personal property                 10,882
                                                              11,798
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (6,418)         5,380

                                                                            $ 5,581
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 326
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           97
   Accrued property taxes                                                        89
   Other liabilities                                                             94
   Due to affiliates (Note B)                                                    55
   Mortgage note payable                                                      4,915

Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
   General partner                                             $ (2)
   Special limited partners                                      (79)
   Limited partners (181,300 units issued and
      outstanding)                                                86              5

                                                                            $ 5,581

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)

                                          Three Months               Nine Months
                                       Ended September 30,       Ended September 30,
                                        2004         2003         2004         2003

   Revenues:
<S>                                    <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
      Rental income                    $ 391        $ 435        $ 1,221      $ 1,252
      Other income                         60           59           174          183
      Casualty gain (Note C)               12           --            21           --
          Total revenues                  463          494         1,416        1,435

   Expenses:
      Operating                           249          222           637          624
      General and administrative           39           27           139           78
      Depreciation                        113          116           347          356
      Interest                            100          100           298          305
      Property taxes                       30           39            89          117
          Total expenses                  531          504         1,510        1,480

   Net loss                            $ (68)       $ (10)        $ (94)       $ (45)

   Net loss allocated to
      general partner (0.2%)            $ --         $ --         $ --         $ --

   Net loss allocated to
      limited partners (99.8%)            (68)         (10)          (94)         (45)

                                       $ (68)       $ (10)        $ (94)       $ (45)

   Net loss per limited
      partnership unit                $ (0.38)     $ (0.06)      $ (0.52)     $ (0.25)

   Distributions per limited
      partnership unit                  $ --         $ --        $ 0.57        $ --

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


                      CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
     CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIENCY) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                    Limited                 Special
                                  Partnership    General    Limited   Limited
                                     Units       Partner   Partners   Partners     Total

<S>                                 <C>            <C>       <C>      <C>         <C>
Original capital contributions      181,808        $ 1       $ --     $45,452     $45,453

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at December 31, 2003             181,300       $ (2)      $ (75)    $ 283       $ 206

Distributions paid to partners           --          --         (4)      (103)       (107)

Net loss for the nine months
   ended September 30, 2004              --          --         --        (94)        (94)

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at September 30, 2004            181,300       $ (2)      $ (79)     $ 86        $ 5

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                 Nine Months Ended
                                                                   September 30,
                                                                   2004       2003
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>
  Net loss                                                       $ (94)       $ (45)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
   cash provided by operating activities:
   Depreciation                                                     347          356
   Amortization of loan costs                                         6            4
   Casualty gain                                                    (21)          --
  Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                       (1)          (5)
      Other assets                                                  (17)         (28)
      Accounts payable                                              (47)         (11)
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                            (1)          22
      Accrued property taxes                                        (35)         (24)
      Other liabilities                                              52           28
      Due to affiliates                                             (33)          --
         Net cash provided by operating activities                  156          297

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (186)        (119)
  Insurance proceeds received                                        41           --
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (145)        (119)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                (111)        (115)
  Distributions paid to partners                                   (107)          --
         Net cash used in financing activities                     (218)        (115)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents               (207)          63
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    243          178
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                        $ 36        $ 241

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                         $ 259        $ 335
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:
  Property improvements and replacements included in
   accounts payable                                              $ 294        $ --

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying  unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements of Consolidated
Capital  Properties VI (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial  statements.  In the opinion of ConCap  Equities,  Inc.  ("CEI" or the
"General  Partner"),  all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating
results  for the  three  and nine  months  ended  September  30,  2004,  are not
necessarily  indicative  of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year
ending  December 31, 2004. For further  information,  refer to the  consolidated
financial  statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2003.  The General
Partner  is  an  affiliate  of  Apartment   Investment  and  Management  Company
("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.

Note B - Related Party Transactions

The  Partnership  has no  employees  and depends on the General  Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership.

Affiliates of the General  Partner are entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts
from  the  Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$68,000  and  $72,000 for the nine  months  ended  September  30, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, which is included in operating expenses.

An affiliate of the General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting to  approximately  $103,000 and
$36,000 for the nine months  ended  September  30, 2004 and 2003,  respectively,
which is included in general and administrative expenses.  Approximately $55,000
of these expenses  remained  unpaid as of September 30, 2004 and are included in
due to affiliates.

The Partnership Agreement also provides for a special management fee equal to 9%
of the total  distributions  made from operations to the Limited  Partners to be
paid  to  the  General  Partner  for  executive  and  administrative  management
services. The General Partner earned approximately $9,000 during the nine months
ended  September  30,  2004  which is  included  in general  and  administrative
expenses. No such fee was earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 as
there were no operating distributions.

The  Partnership  insures its  property up to certain  limits  through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability.  The Partnership  insures its property above the AIMCO limits through
insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the General
Partner.  During  the  nine  months  ended  September  30,  2004 and  2003,  the
Partnership  was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates  approximately  $24,000 and
$21,000,  respectively,  for insurance  coverage and fees associated with policy
claims administration.

Note C - Casualty Events

In January 2004 a pipe bomb explosion  occurred at the property which damaged 16
electrical  meters and exterior  siding.  No  apartment  units were  damaged.  A
casualty  gain of  approximately  $9,000 was  recognized  during the nine months
ended  September  30,  2004  due to the  receipt  of  approximately  $16,000  in
insurance  proceeds,  net  of  the  write  off  of  undepreciated  property  and
improvements of approximately $7,000.

In April 2004 there was a fire at the property that damaged two apartment units.
A casualty gain of approximately  $12,000 was recognized  during the nine months
ended  September  30,  2004  due to the  receipt  of  approximately  $25,000  in
insurance  proceeds,  net  of  the  write  off  of  undepreciated  property  and
improvements of approximately $13,000.

Note D - Subsequent Event

Subsequent  to  September  30,  2004,  the  General  Partner   advanced  to  the
Partnership  approximately  $225,000 to cover expenses  related to operations at
Colony of  Springdale  Apartments.  Interest  will be  charged  at prime plus 2%
(6.75% at September 30, 2004).

Note E - Contingencies

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purported to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships  (including the Partnership) that are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time,  affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief,  including judicial
dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a
complaint captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group (the "Heller action") was
filed against the same  defendants  that are named in the Nuanes  action.  On or
about August 6, 2001,  plaintiffs  filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller
action was brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserted claims for,
among other things,  breach of fiduciary duty, unfair  competition,  conversion,
unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make at least
one round of tender offers to purchase all of the  partnership  interests in the
Partnerships within one year of final approval, if it is granted, and to provide
partners  with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The
proposed  settlement  also provided for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs
which the General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector") filed an appeal (the "Appeal") seeking to vacate and/or reverse the
order approving the settlement and entering  judgment  thereto.  On November 24,
2003,  the Objector  filed an  application  requesting  the court order AIMCO to
withdraw settlement tender offers it had commenced,  refrain from making further
offers  pending  the appeal and auction  any units  tendered  to third  parties,
contending  that the offers did not  conform  with the terms of the  settlement.
Counsel  for the  Objector  (on behalf of another  investor)  had  alternatively
requested the court take certain action  purportedly to enforce the terms of the
settlement agreement. On December 18, 2003, the court heard oral argument on the
motions  and denied them both in their  entirety.  The  Objector  filed a second
appeal challenging the court's use of a referee and its order requiring Objector
to pay those fees.

On January 28, 2004,  the  Objector  filed his opening  brief in the Appeal.  On
April 23, 2004, the Managing General Partner and its affiliates filed a response
brief in support of the settlement and the judgment thereto. The plaintiffs have
also filed a brief in support of the settlement. On June 4, 2004, Objector filed
a reply to the briefs  submitted by the Managing General Partner and Plaintiffs.
In addition both the Objector and plaintiffs filed briefs in connection with the
second  appeal.  The Court of Appeals  heard oral  argument  on both  appeals on
September 22, 2004 and took the matters under submission.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs,  associated with these cases will be material
to the Partnership's overall operations.

On August 8, 2003 AIMCO  Properties  L.P., an affiliate of the General  Partner,
was served with a complaint in the United  States  District  Court,  District of
Columbia alleging that AIMCO Properties L.P.  willfully  violated the Fair Labor
Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to pay  maintenance  workers  overtime for all
hours worked in excess of forty per week. On March 5, 2004 the plaintiffs  filed
an amended  complaint  also  naming  NHP  Management  Company,  which is also an
affiliate of the General Partner. The complaint is styled as a Collective Action
under the FLSA and seeks to certify state  subclasses in  California,  Maryland,
and the District of Columbia.  Specifically,  the plaintiffs  contend that AIMCO
Properties L.P. failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were
required to be "on-call".  Additionally,  the complaint alleges AIMCO Properties
L.P. failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time
that they worked in responding to a call while  "on-call".  The defendants  have
filed an answer to the amended  complaint  denying the substantive  allegations.
Some discovery has taken place and settlement  negotiations  continue.  Although
the outcome of any  litigation is  uncertain,  AIMCO  Properties,  L.P. does not
believe that the ultimate  outcome  will have a material  adverse  effect on its
financial  condition or results of operations.  Similarly,  the General  Partner
does not believe that the ultimate  outcome will have a material  adverse effect
on the Partnership's financial condition or results of operations.

The  Partnership  is unaware  of any other  pending  or  outstanding  litigation
matters  involving  it or its  investment  properties  that are not of a routine
nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

As  previously  disclosed,  the  Central  Regional  Office of the United  States
Securities  and  Exchange   Commission   (the  "SEC")  is  conducting  a  formal
investigation relating to certain matters.  Although the staff of the SEC is not
limited  in the  areas  that it may  investigate,  AIMCO  believes  the areas of
investigation include AIMCO's miscalculated monthly net rental income figures in
third quarter 2003,  forecasted  guidance,  accounts payable,  rent concessions,
vendor  rebates,  capitalization  of payroll and certain  other  costs,  and tax
credit  transactions.  AIMCO is cooperating  fully. AIMCO is not able to predict
when the matter  will be  resolved.  AIMCO does not  believe  that the  ultimate
outcome  will  have a  material  adverse  effect on its  consolidated  financial
condition  or results of  operations.  Similarly,  the General  Partner does not
believe that the ultimate  outcome  will have a material  adverse  effect on the
Partnership's consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 2.     Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending   claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes  and   possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment property consists of one apartment complex, Colony
of Springdale Apartments, located in Springdale, Ohio. The average occupancy for
the nine month  periods  ended  September  30,  2004 and 2003,  was 90% and 91%,
respectively.

The  Partnership's  financial  results depend upon a number of factors including
the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment property, interest
rates on mortgage  loans,  costs  incurred to operate the  investment  property,
general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of
the Partnership,  the General Partner monitors the rental market  environment of
its  investment   property  to  assess  the  feasibility  of  increasing  rents,
maintaining or increasing  occupancy  levels and protecting the Partnership from
increases in expenses.  As part of this plan,  the General  Partner  attempts to
protect  the  Partnership  from the  burden of  inflation-related  increases  in
expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.
However,  the  General  Partner  may use  rental  concessions  and  rental  rate
reductions  to offset  softening  market  conditions,  accordingly,  there is no
guarantee that the General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further,
a number of factors that are outside the control of the Partnership, such as the
local  economic  climate and weather,  can  adversely or  positively  affect the
Partnership's financial results.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's  net loss for the three and nine months ended  September  30,
2004 was approximately $68,000 and $94,000 compared to net loss of approximately
$10,000 and $45,000 for the  corresponding  periods in 2003.  Net loss increased
for the  three  and nine  months  ended  September  30,  2004 as a result  of an
increase in total expenses and a decrease in total revenues.

Total expenses  increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004
due to increases in operating and general and administrative expenses, partially
offset by a decrease in property tax expenses.  Operating expenses increased for
the three  and nine  months  ended  September  30,  2004 due to an  increase  in
property  expenses  partially  offset by a  decrease  in  maintenance  expenses.
Property  expenses  increased  primarily due to an increase in utility expenses.
Maintenance  expenses decreased  primarily due to reduced contract service costs
at the  property.  Property  tax expense  decreased  for both the three and nine
months ended  September 30, 2004 due to a decrease in the assessed  value of the
property.

General  and  administrative  expenses  increased  for the three and nine months
ended  September  30, 2004  primarily due to an increase in the cost of services
included in the  management  reimbursements  to the  General  Partner as allowed
under the  Partnership  Agreement  partially  offset by a decrease  in the costs
associated  with the annual audit  required by the  Partnership  Agreement.  The
increase  during the nine  months  ended  September  30, 2004 was also due to an
increase  in the  special  management  fees  earned by the  General  Partner for
executive and administration  management services. The fee is equal to 9% of the
total distributions made from operations to the Limited Partners.  Also included
in general and administrative  expenses at September 30, 2004 and 2003 are costs
associated  with the  quarterly  and annual  communications  with  investors and
regulatory agencies.

The decrease in total revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2004 was  primarily  due to a decrease in rental  income  partially  offset by a
casualty gain (as discussed below).  Rental income decreased  primarily due to a
decrease  in  occupancy  and  average  rental  rates  at  Colony  of  Springdale
Apartments.

In January 2004 a pipe bomb explosion  occurred at the property which damaged 16
electrical  meters and exterior  siding.  No  apartment  units were  damaged.  A
casualty  gain of  approximately  $9,000 was  recognized  during the nine months
ended  September  30,  2004  due to the  receipt  of  approximately  $16,000  in
insurance  proceeds,  net  of  the  write  off  of  undepreciated  property  and
improvements of approximately $7,000.

In April 2004 there was a fire at the property that damaged two apartment units.
A casualty gain of approximately  $12,000 was recognized  during the nine months
ended  September  30,  2004  due to the  receipt  of  approximately  $25,000  in
insurance  proceeds,  net  of  the  write  off  of  undepreciated  property  and
improvements of approximately $13,000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  September  30,  2004,  the  Partnership  had cash and  cash  equivalents  of
approximately $36,000 compared to approximately  $241,000 at September 30, 2003.
Cash and cash equivalents decreased by approximately $207,000 since December 31,
2003 due to  approximately  $145,000 and $218,000 of cash used in investing  and
financing activities,  respectively,  partially offset by approximately $156,000
of cash  provided by operating  activities.  Cash used in  investing  activities
consisted  of  property  improvements  and  replacements   partially  offset  by
insurance  proceeds  received.  Cash used in financing  activities  consisted of
principal payments made on the mortgage  encumbering the Partnership's  property
and distributions paid to partners.  The Partnership invests its working capital
reserves in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal,  state,
and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  General  Partner  monitors
developments in the area of legal and regulatory  compliance.  For example,  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests  additional  compliance measures
with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these
changes,  the Partnership  expects that it will incur higher expenses related to
compliance.  Capital  improvements  planned for the  Partnership's  property are
detailed below.

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2004,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately   $480,000  of  capital   improvements  at  Colony  of  Springdale
Apartments,  consisting  primarily of wood siding,  roof,  floor  covering,  air
conditioning unit and appliance replacements and structural improvements.  These
improvements  were funded from operating cash flow and insurance  proceeds.  The
Partnership  evaluates the capital  improvement needs of the property during the
year and  currently  expects  to  complete  an  additional  $261,000  in capital
improvements during the remainder of 2004.  Additional capital  improvements may
be considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well
as the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

The  Partnership's  assets are thought to be sufficient  for any near term needs
(exclusive  of  capital   improvements)   of  the   Partnership.   The  mortgage
indebtedness  encumbering the Partnership's property of approximately $4,915,000
matures in November  2019 at which time the  mortgage is  scheduled  to be fully
amortized.

The Partnership  distributed the following  amounts during the nine months ended
September 30, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands, except per unit data):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                  Nine Months Ended    Per Limited  Nine Months Ended     Per Limited
                    September 30,     Partnership     September 30,       Partnership
                        2004              Unit             2003              Unit

<S>                   <C>               <C>               <C>              <C>
   Operations         $107              $  0.57           $   --           $   --
</TABLE>

The  Partnership's  cash  available  for  distribution  is reviewed on a monthly
basis. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated
from  operations,  the  availability of cash reserves and the timing of the debt
maturity,  refinancing,  and/or sale of the property.  There can be no assurance
that the  Partnership  will  generate  sufficient  funds from  operations  after
required capital expenditures to permit further distributions to its partners in
2004 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 102,000 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 56.26% of the outstanding Units at
September  30,  2004. A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender
offers  made by  AIMCO  or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its
affiliates will acquire  additional  Units in exchange for cash or a combination
of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO,
either through private  purchases or tender offers.  Pursuant to the Partnership
Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take
action with  respect to a variety of matters that  include,  but are not limited
to,  voting on certain  amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove  the  General  Partner.  As a result  of its  ownership  of 56.26% of the
outstanding  Units,  AIMCO and its  affiliates  are in a position to control all
voting decisions with respect to the  Partnership.  Although the General Partner
owes fiduciary duties to the limited  partners of the  Partnership,  the General
Partner  also  owes  fiduciary  duties  to AIMCO as its sole  stockholder.  As a
result,  the  duties  of  the  General  Partner,  as  general  partner,  to  the
Partnership  and its limited  partners may come into conflict with the duties of
the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles   generally  accepted  in  the  United  States,   which  require  the
Partnership to make estimates and assumptions.  The Partnership believes that of
its significant  accounting policies,  the following may involve a higher degree
of judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The  investment  property is recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's  investment  property.  These factors include, but are not limited
to,  changes  in the  national,  regional  and  local  economic  climate;  local
conditions,  such as an oversupply of multifamily  properties;  competition from
other available  multifamily property owners and changes in market rental rates.
Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnership's
assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized monthly as it is earned. The
Partnership  evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an
allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than
30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.
The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or
in response to heavy  competition from other similar  complexes in the area. Any
concessions  given at the inception of the lease are amortized  over the life of
the lease.

ITEM 3.     Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.

                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purported to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships  (including the Partnership) that are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time,  affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief,  including judicial
dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a
complaint captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group (the "Heller action") was
filed against the same  defendants  that are named in the Nuanes  action.  On or
about August 6, 2001,  plaintiffs  filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller
action was brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserted claims for,
among other things,  breach of fiduciary duty, unfair  competition,  conversion,
unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make at least
one round of tender offers to purchase all of the  partnership  interests in the
Partnerships within one year of final approval, if it is granted, and to provide
partners  with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The
proposed  settlement  also provided for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs
which the General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector") filed an appeal (the "Appeal") seeking to vacate and/or reverse the
order approving the settlement and entering  judgment  thereto.  On November 24,
2003,  the Objector  filed an  application  requesting  the court order AIMCO to
withdraw settlement tender offers it had commenced,  refrain from making further
offers  pending  the appeal and auction  any units  tendered  to third  parties,
contending  that the offers did not  conform  with the terms of the  settlement.
Counsel  for the  Objector  (on behalf of another  investor)  had  alternatively
requested the court take certain action  purportedly to enforce the terms of the
settlement agreement. On December 18, 2003, the court heard oral argument on the
motions  and denied them both in their  entirety.  The  Objector  filed a second
appeal challenging the court's use of a referee and its order requiring Objector
to pay those fees.

On January 28, 2004,  the  Objector  filed his opening  brief in the Appeal.  On
April 23, 2004, the Managing General Partner and its affiliates filed a response
brief in support of the settlement and the judgment thereto. The plaintiffs have
also filed a brief in support of the settlement. On June 4, 2004, Objector filed
a reply to the briefs  submitted by the Managing General Partner and Plaintiffs.
In addition both the Objector and plaintiffs filed briefs in connection with the
second  appeal.  The Court of Appeals  heard oral  argument  on both  appeals on
September 22, 2004 and took the matters under submission.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs,  associated with these cases will be material
to the Partnership's overall operations.

On August 8, 2003 AIMCO  Properties  L.P., an affiliate of the Managing  General
Partner,  was served  with a  complaint  in the United  States  District  Court,
District of Columbia alleging that AIMCO Properties L.P.  willfully violated the
Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime
for all  hours  worked  in  excess  of forty  per  week.  On  March 5,  2004 the
plaintiffs filed an amended complaint also naming NHP Management Company,  which
is also an affiliate of the Managing General Partner. The complaint is styled as
a Collective  Action  under the FLSA and seeks to certify  state  subclasses  in
California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs
contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. failed to compensate  maintenance workers for
time  that they were  required  to be  "on-call".  Additionally,  the  complaint
alleges AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  failed to comply with the FLSA in  compensating
maintenance  workers  for time that they  worked in  responding  to a call while
"on-call".  The defendants have filed an answer to the amended complaint denying
the  substantive  allegations.  Some  discovery  has taken place and  settlement
negotiations  continue.  Although the outcome of any  litigation  is  uncertain,
AIMCO  Properties,  L.P. does not believe that the ultimate  outcome will have a
material  adverse  effect on its financial  condition or results of  operations.
Similarly,  the General Partner does not believe that the ultimate  outcome will
have a material  adverse  effect on the  Partnership's  financial  condition  or
results of operations.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS

            See attached Exhibit Index

                                   SIGNATURES

In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI


                                    By:   CONCAP EQUITIES, INC.
                                          General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                           Stephen B. Waters
                                           Vice President


                                    Date: November 12, 2004


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                                  EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit Number    Description of Exhibit

       3.1        Certificate of Limited Partnership,  incorporated by reference
                  to the Registration  Statement of Registrant filed October 22,
                  1984, as amended to date.

       3.2        Agreement of Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to
                  the  Registration  Statement of  Registrant  filed October 22,
                  1984, as amended to date.

      10.22       Multi-family  note between  Colony of  Springdale  Associates,
                  Ltd. and GMAC Commercial  Mortgage  Corporation  dated October
                  25, 1999.  (Incorporated  by reference to the Annual Report on
                  Form 10-K dated December 31, 1999.)

      31.1        Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Executive  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      31.2        Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Financial  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      32.1        Certification   Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
                  Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
                  of 2002.



<PAGE>


Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Martha L. Long, certify that:

1.    I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Consolidated
      Capital Properties VI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this
      report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the small business issuer and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
            made  known to us by  others  within  those  entities,  particularly
            during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
            disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
            conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
            on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
            internal  control over financial  reporting that occurred during the
            small  business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the small
            business  issuer's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual
            report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
            materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
      disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
      committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
            ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report   financial
            information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees who have a significant  role in the small  business
            issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 12, 2004

                                    /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Martha L. Long
                                    Senior  Vice   President  of  ConCap
                                    Equities,  Inc.,  equivalent  of the
                                    chief   executive   officer  of  the
                                    Partnership

Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.    I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Consolidated
      Capital Properties VI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this
      report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the small business issuer and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
            made  known to us by  others  within  those  entities,  particularly
            during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
            disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
            conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
            on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
            internal  control over financial  reporting that occurred during the
            small  business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the small
            business  issuer's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual
            report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
            materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
      disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
      committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
            ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report   financial
            information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees who have a significant  role in the small  business
            issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 12, 2004

                                    /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                    Stephen B. Waters
                                    Vice    President    of    ConCap
                                    Equities,   Inc.,  equivalent  of
                                    the chief  financial  officer  of
                                    the Partnership


Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated  Capital
Properties VI (the "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer
of the  Partnership,  and  Stephen B.  Waters,  as the  equivalent  of the chief
financial  officer of the  Partnership,  each hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Name:  Martha L. Long
                                    Date:  November 12, 2004


                                           /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                    Name:  Stephen B. Waters
                                    Date:  November 12, 2004



This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.