alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11.503 Contract clauses.

(a) Use the clause at 52.211-11, Liquidated Damages-Supplies, Services, or Research and

Development, in fixed-price solicitations and contracts for supplies, services, or research and

development when the contracting officer determines that liquidated damages are appropriate (see

11.501(a)).

(b) Use the clause at 52.211-12, Liquidated Damages-Construction, in solicitations and contracts for

construction, other than cost-plus-fixed-fee, when the contracting officer determines that liquidated

damages are appropriate (see 11.501(a)). If the contract specifies more than one completion date for

separate parts or stages of the work, revise paragraph (a) of the clause to state the amount of

liquidated damages for delay of each separate part or stage of the work.

(c) Use the clause at 52.211-13, Time Extensions, in solicitations and contracts for construction that

use the clause at 52.211-12, Liquidated Damages-Construction, when that clause has been revised

as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.

Parent topic: Subpart 11.5 - Liquidated Damages
#### § 51.1835 Very serious damage.

*Very serious damage* means any specific defect described in § 51.1837, Table I; or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which very seriously detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the fruit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,177
<SECURITIES>                                    23,738
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,436
<INVENTORY>                                        738
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,466
<PP&E>                                          12,637
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,818
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,205
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,563
<SALES>                                         15,738
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,738
<CGS>                                            3,084
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,084
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,925
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    900
<INCOME-TAX>                                       315
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                585
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       585
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
# 3.201 Applicability.

This subpart applies to all *executive agencies*, except that coverage concerning exemplary damages applies only to the Department of Defense (10 U.S.C. 4651).          

**Parent topic:**Subpart 3.2 - Contractor Gratuities to Government Personnel
25.407 Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft.       Under the authority of Section 303 of the Trade Agreements Act, the U.S. Trade Representative has waived the Buy American statute for civil aircraft and related articles that meet the substantial transformation test of the Trade Agreements Act, from countries that are parties to the Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft. Those countries are Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macao China, Malta, Montenegro, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan (Chinese Taipei), and the United Kingdom.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 25.4 - Trade Agreements
#### § 4285.94 Other conditions.

*Post-award requirements.* Upon awarding the cooperative agreement, the post-award and audit requirements of 2 CFR part 200, as adopted by USDA in 2 CFR part 400 apply.

[79 FR 76018, Dec. 19, 2014]
22.304 Variations, tolerances, and exemptions.       (a) 						            The Secretary of Labor, under 40 U.S.C.3706, upon the Secretary’s initiative or at the request of any Federal agency, may provide reasonable limitations and allow variations, tolerances, and exemptions to and from any or all provisions of the statute (see 29 CFR5.15).                                          (b) 						            The Secretary of Labor may make variations, tolerances, and exemptions from the regulatory requirements of applicable parts of 29 CFRwhen the Secretary finds that such action is necessary and proper in the public interest or to prevent injustice and undue hardship (see 29 CFR5.14).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 22.3 - Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act
#### § 51.2659 Condition defects.

*Condition defects* means defects which may develop or change during shipment or storage; including, but not limited to decayed or soft cherries and such factors as pitting, shriveling, sunken areas, brown discoloration and bruising which is so located as to indicate that it occurred after packing.
<page>
                                                           Exhibit 32.2

                         NORDSTROM CREDIT, INC.

                            13531 EAST CALEY

                       CENTENNIAL, COLORADO 80111

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
              OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, Michael G. Koppel, the Vice President and Treasurer of Nordstrom
Credit, Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended May 1, 2004 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission:

     - fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
       Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     - the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of
       operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Michael G. Koppel
                                                ---------------------
                                                Michael G. Koppel
                                                Vice President and
                                                Treasurer
                                                June 8, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Nordstrom Credit, Inc. and will be retained by
Nordstrom Credit, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
31.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


RULE
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,


AS
AMENDED




I,
Michael I. Wirth, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Kohlberg Capital Corporation (the
“registrant”);




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




Date:
      March 25, 2009
                      
                      By
                      /
      S / Michael I. WirthMichael
      I. Wirth
                          Chief
      Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer
                            (Principal
      Financial
  Officer)
Case 5:03-cr-00033-MCR-CJK   Document 310   Filed 03/15/07   Page 1 of 7

Case 5:03-cr-00033-MCR-CJK   Document 310   Filed 03/15/07   Page 2 of 7

Case 5:03-cr-00033-MCR-CJK   Document 310   Filed 03/15/07   Page 3 of 7

Case 5:03-cr-00033-MCR-CJK   Document 310   Filed 03/15/07   Page 4 of 7

Case 5:03-cr-00033-MCR-CJK   Document 310   Filed 03/15/07   Page 5 of 7

Case 5:03-cr-00033-MCR-CJK   Document 310   Filed 03/15/07   Page 6 of 7

Case 5:03-cr-00033-MCR-CJK   Document 310   Filed 03/15/07   Page 7 of 7
#### § 51.2079 Application of tolerances.

The tolerances for the foregoing grades are applied to the entire lot of almonds, based upon a composite sample drawn from containers throughout the lot.
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Serdar Kirmizioglu, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Gryphon Resources Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)   The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.








/s/ Serdar Kirmizioglu


Serdar Kirmizioglu


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer


January 13, 2010








A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Subpart 22.7 - [Reserved]           **Parent topic:** Part 22 - Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions
19.1403 Status.

(a) Status as an SDVOSB concern is determined by SBA in accordance with 13 CFR part 128; also

see 19.307.

(b) For an SDVOSB concern that seeks an SDVOSB set-aside or sole-source contract, the contracting

officer shall verify that the offeror—

(1) Effective January 1, 2024, is designated in the System for Award Management (SAM) as an

SDVOSB concern certified by SBA; or

(2) Has represented that it is an SDVOSB concern in SAM and submitted an application for

certification to SBA on or before December 31, 2023. Pending applications for certification are in the

SBA Veteran Small Business Certification Program database at https://veterans.certify.sba.gov.

(c) If there is a decision issued by SBA as a result of a current eligibility examination finding that the

concern did not qualify as an SDVOSB concern eligible under the SDVOSB Program or SBA denies a

concern’s application for SDVOSB certification, the concern must update its SDVOSB status in SAM

within 2 days of SBA’s final decision to reflect that the concern is not an eligible SDVOSB. SBA will

update the concern’s SDVOSB status in SAM within 2 days of the concern’s failure to make the

update.

(d) Effective January 1, 2024, a joint venture may be considered an SDVOSB concern eligible under

the SDVOSB Program if—

(1) The joint venture qualifies as small under 19.301-1(a)(2)(i);

(2) The managing SDVOSB joint venture partner—

(i) Is designated in SAM as an SDVOSB concern certified by SBA; or

Has represented that it is an SDVOSB concern in SAM and submitted an application for certification

to SBA on or before December 31, 2023. Pending applications for certification are in the SBA

Veteran Small Business Certification database at https://veterans.certify.sba.gov; and (ii)

(3) The joint venture complies with the requirements of 13 CFR 128.402.

Parent topic: Subpart 19.14 - Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement

Program
EX-10.2







Exhibit 10.2




			
	 	 	 
	
	 	Superior Well Services, Inc..

1380 RT 286 East Suite #121

Indiana, PA 15701

Telephone 724-465-8904






April 17, 2009




Mr. Jake Linaberger

1380 Rt. 286 East, Suite 121

Indiana, PA 15701




Dear Jake:




     This letter is to memorialize our agreement that you have volunteered to reduce your
annualized base salary by 15%, to $306,000. This agreement will constitute an amendment to your
Employment Agreement which was executed by you on September 15, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”).
You explicitly acknowledge and agree that the reduction in your base salary has been completely
voluntary and will not be considered a “Change in Terms of Service,” as defined in the Employment
Agreement.



     Thank you for your continued service to Superior Well Services.



	 	 	 
	 

	 	Sincerely,
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Dave Wallace
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/ Jake Linaberger
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	April 17, 2009
```

[108th Congress Public Law 318]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ318.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 1211]]

Public Law 108-318
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of 1972 to clarify 
 the acreage for which the North Loup division is authorized to provide 
irrigation water under the Missouri River Basin project. <<NOTE: Oct. 5, 
                         2004 -  [H.R. 3209]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF ACREAGE FOR IRRIGATION WATER.

    Section 501 of the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of 1972 (43 
U.S.C. 615dddd) is amended by striking ``fifty-three thousand acres'' 
and inserting ``approximately 53,000 acres''.

    Approved October 5, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3209:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108-356 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 108-289 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 149 (2003):
                                    Nov. 17, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 150 (2004):
                                    Sept. 15, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
36.602-1 Selection criteria.       (a) 						            Agencies shall evaluate each potential contractor in terms of its-                                                         (1) 								                Professional qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required services;                                                            (2) 								                Specialized experience and technical competence in the type of work required, including, where appropriate, experience in energy conservation, pollution prevention, waste reduction, and the use of recovered materials;                                                            (3) 								                Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time;                                                            (4) 								                Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules;                                                            (5) 								                Location in the general geographical area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project; provided, that application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project; and                                                            (6) 								                Acceptability under other appropriate evaluation criteria.                                                                             (b) 						            When the use of design competition is approved by the agency head or a designee, agencies may evaluate firms on the basis of their conceptual design of the project. Design competition may be used when-                                                         (1) 								                Unique situations exist involving prestige projects, such as the design of memorials and structures of unusual national significance;                                                            (2) 								                Sufficient time is available for the production and evaluation of conceptual designs; and                                                            (3) 								                The design competition, with its costs, will substantially benefit the project.                                                                             (c) 						            Hold discussions with at least three of the most highly qualified firms regarding concepts, the relative utility of alternative methods and feasible ways to prescribe the use of recovered materials and achieve waste reduction and energy-efficiency in facility design (see part  23).    **Parent topic:** 36.602 Selection of firms for architect-engineer contracts.
#### § 4284.9 Grant disbursement.

The Agency will determine, based on 2 CFR part 200 as adopted by USDA in 2 CFR part 400 whether disbursement of a grant will be by advance or reimbursement.

[79 FR 76017, Dec. 19, 2014]
Exhibit 23.02

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Adelphia Communications Corporation
for the year ended March 31, 1997 of our report dated March 26, 1997 for Olympus
Communications, L.P. and subsidiaries and contained in Amendment No. 2 to
Registration Statement No. 333-19327 of Olympus Communications, L.P. and Olympus
Capital Corporation on Form S-4 under the Securities Act of 1933 insofar as such
report relates to the financial statements and schedules of Adelphia
Communications Corporation for the year ended March 31, 1997.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
June 19, 1997

                                       85
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ANDREW J. PAYNE,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-225-AW-GRJ

SECRETARY, FLA. DEP’T OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner initiated this case seeking § 2254 relief. I have now considered the 

magistrate judge’s May 12, 2021 report and recommendation, ECF No. 11, and have 

considered de novo the issues presented in Petitioner’s objections, ECF No. 12. I 

agree with the magistrate judge: The petition is untimely and must be dismissed. 

The report and recommendation (ECF No. 11) is adopted and incorporated 

into this order. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “The § 2254 petition is 

dismissed as untimely.” A certificate of appealability is DENIED. The clerk will 

close the file.

SO ORDERED on July 6, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge
# L_2013268EN.01001701.xml

| 10.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 268/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 268/17

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 768/2013 of 8 August 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 917/2004 on detailed rules to implement Council Regulation (EC) No 797/2004 on measures improving general conditions for the production and marketing of apiculture products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 214 of 9 August 2013
  )

On page 8, in the Annex table, row HR:

for:

| ‘HR | 491 481 ’, |
| --- | --- |

‘HR

491 481 ’,

read:

| ‘HR | 491 981 ’. |
| --- | --- |

‘HR

491 981 ’.

---
#### § 351.6 Packages in closed mail dispatches.

The foregoing instructions shall be followed in the treatment of packages containing plants or plant products received in closed mail dispatches made up for transmission directly to a post office located at a customs port at which no plant quarantine inspector is stationed. Such packages (accompanied by customs card Form 3511) shall be forwarded by the collector of customs through the postmaster to the most accessible location listed in § 351.2 for appropriate treatment in the manner hereinbefore provided. This procedure shall also be followed in respect to such packages which are forwarded to unlisted post offices from the post office of original receipt, without having received plant quarantine examination. Packages discovered at post offices where no customs officer is located shall be forwarded by the postmaster under his official penalty envelope addressed to the collector of customs at the most accessible location listed for appropriate treatment as prescribed herein.

[24 FR 9923, Dec. 9, 1959, as amended at 36 FR 24917, Dec. 24, 1971]
# L_2015213DE.01006501.xml

| 12.8.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 213/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 213/65

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1372/2013 der Kommission vom 19. Dezember 2013 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 883/2004 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zur Koordinierung der Systeme der sozialen Sicherheit und der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 987/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zur Festlegung der Modalitäten für die Durchführung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 883/2004

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 346 vom 20. Dezember 2013
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 346 vom 20. Dezember 2013

Seite 27, Artikel 1 Absatz 1 Buchstabe a zur Änderung des Anhangs VIII Teil 2 Eintrag „ÖSTERREICH“ Buchstabe a der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 883/2004:

anstatt:

| „a) | Alters- und Hinterbliebenenpensionen auf der Grundlage eines Pensionskontos nach dem Allgemeinen Pensionsgesetz (APG) vom 18. November 2004;“ |
| --- | --- |

„a)

Alters- und Hinterbliebenenpensionen auf der Grundlage eines Pensionskontos nach dem Allgemeinen Pensionsgesetz (APG) vom 18. November 2004;“

muss es heißen:

| „a) | Alterspensionen und sich aus solchen ableitende Hinterbliebenenpensionen auf der Grundlage eines Pensionskontos nach dem Allgemeinen Pensionsgesetz (APG) vom 18. November 2004;“. |
| --- | --- |

„a)

Alterspensionen und sich aus solchen ableitende Hinterbliebenenpensionen auf der Grundlage eines Pensionskontos nach dem Allgemeinen Pensionsgesetz (APG) vom 18. November 2004;“.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 20, 2012

s1113

Order 

November 20, 2012

145513

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145513

COA: 307259

Wayne CC: 84-003503-FC

RAY WILLIAM HOWELL, a/k/a RAYMOND

HOWELL, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### §§ 505.3-505.5 [Reserved]