alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[ARTICLE] 5
[LEGEND]
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in federally tax-exempt
revenue bonds, which financed construction and/or ownership of multi-family
residential properties.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance
sheet is unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying
audited financial statements.
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1997
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1997
[CASH]                                       4,231,538
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                  381,856
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                     0
[PP&E]                                               0
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                             133,272,601<F1>
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                                0
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                             0
[OTHER-SE]                                 119,251,523<F2>
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]               133,272,601<F3>
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                            10,109,725<F4>
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                             1,105,495<F5>
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                              9,004,230
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                          9,004,230
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                 9,004,230
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                     1.18<F6>
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include investment in
revenue bonds of $120,317,750, net deferred expenses of $835,058, escrowed
funds of $747,222, purchaser's deposit of $6,371,135 and prepaid expenses of
$388,042.
<F2>Represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and other liabilities of $1,070,312,
excess of equity in losses of property-owning investees over investments
therein of $6,579,631 and purchaser's deposit of $6,371,135.
<F4>Total revenue includes interest income of $10,109,725.
<F5>Other expenses include equity in losses of property-owning investees of
$607,755 and general and administrative expenses of $497,740.
<F6>Represents net income per Assigned Benefit Certificate.
</FN>
</TABLE>
#### § 58.636 Homogenization.

Homogenization of the pasteurized mix shall be accomplished to effectively reduce the size of the milkfat globules and evenly disperse them throughout the mix.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2591 

To exempt persons with disabilities from the prohibition against providing 

section 8 rental assistance to college students. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Mr. DEWINE (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. HARKIN, and Mr. VOINOVICH) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To exempt persons with disabilities from the prohibition 

against providing section 8 rental assistance to college 

students. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES 

4 FROM SECTION 8 RENTAL ASSISTANCE PRO5 HIBITION. 

6 Section 327(a) of Public Law 109–115 (119 Stat. 

7 2466) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

9 end; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 2591 IS

1 (2) by redesignating paragraph (6) as para2 graph (7); and 

3 (3) by inserting after paragraph the following 

4 new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(6) is not a person with disabilities, as such 

6 term is defined in section 3(b)(3)(E) of the United 

7 States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 

8 1437a(b)(3)(E)); and’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Page 1 of 2 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

PATRICK ANTHONY RIBBING, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 3:20cv5698-RV-HTC 

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., 

 Defendants. 

________________________________/ 

O R D E R

 This case is before the Court based on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 6). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.1

 Having 

considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and 

Recommendation should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 

1

 Although the plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation per se, he has filed a 

document entitled “Affidavit of Debt” (Doc. 8), which I have reviewed. 

Case 3:20-cv-05698-RV-HTC Document 9 Filed 09/29/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 

Case No. 3:20cv5698-RV-HTC

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff’s 

failure to prosecute and failure to comply with orders of the Court. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

 DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of September, 2020. 

s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:20-cv-05698-RV-HTC Document 9 Filed 09/29/20 Page 2 of 2
32.502-3 Solicitation provisions.       (a) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.232-13, Notice of Progress Payments, in invitations for bids and requests for proposals that include a Progress Payments clause.                                          (b)                                                         (1) 								                Under the authority of the statutes cited in 32.101, an invitation for bids may restrict the availability of progress payments to small business concerns only.                                                            (2) 								                The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.232-14, Notice of Availability of Progress Payments Exclusively for Small Business Concerns, in invitations for bids if it is anticipated that-                                                                           (i) 										                    Both small business concerns and others may submit bids in response to the same invitation; and                                                                              (ii) 										                    Only the small business bidders would need progress payments.                                                                                                                            (c) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.232-15, Progress Payments Not Included, in invitations for bids if the solicitation will not contain one of the provisions prescribed in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.    **Parent topic:** 32.502 Preaward matters.
34.203 Solicitation provisions and contract

clause.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert a provision that is substantially the same as the provision at

FAR 52.234-2, Notice of Earned Value Management System-Preaward Integrated Baseline Review,

in solicitations for contracts that require the contractor to use an Earned Value Management System

(EVMS) and for which the Government requires an Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) prior to award.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert a provision that is substantially the same as the provision at

52.234-3, Notice of Earned Value Management System-Postaward Integrated Baseline Review, in

solicitations for contracts that require the contractor to use an Earned Value Management System

(EVMS) and for which the Government requires an Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) after contract

award.

(c) The contracting officer shall insert a clause that is substantially the same as the clause at FAR

52.234-4, Earned Value Management System, in solicitations and contracts that require a contractor

to use an EVMS.

Parent topic: Subpart 34.2 - Earned Value Management System
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 5:93cr5008-SPM

MICHAEL LEE,

YVONNE CHIN,

and

LOUIS EDEN CHIN

Defendants.

______________________________

ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the “Government’s Motion to

Dismiss” (doc. 224). This motion requests the dismissal of this case because the

insufficient evidence, the age of the case and the unavailability of witnesses all

make it unlikely that the Government could succeed in a prosecution of this case. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Government’s

motion (doc. 224) is granted. This case is hereby dismissed without

prejudice. 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this fourth day of June, 2009.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 5:93-cr-05008-RS Document 225 Filed 06/04/09 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter  ended June 30, 1998 for May Limited  Partnership  1984-2 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000757385
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1984-2
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         263
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  127
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               390
<PP&E>                                         10,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   413
<SALES>                                        341
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               348
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  73
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                275
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            275
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   275
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  21.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  21.43
        



</TABLE>
# 47.208-2 Contract clause.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.247-68, Report of *Shipment* (REPSHIP), in *solicitations* and contracts when advance notice of *shipment* is required for safety or security reasons, or where carload or truckload *shipments* will be made to DoD installations or, as required, to civilian agency facilities.

**Parent topic:**47.208 Report of shipment (REPSHIP).
Subpart 31.7 - Contracts with Nonprofit Organizations    **Parent topic:** Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures31.701 Purpose.       This subpart provides the principles for determining the cost applicable to work performed by nonprofit organizations under contracts with the Government. A nonprofit organization, for purpose of identification, is defined as a business entity organized and operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, or educational purposes, of which no part of the net earnings inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual, of which no substantial part of the activities is carrying on propaganda or otherwise attempting to influence legislation or participating in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office, and which are exempt from Federal income taxation under section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code.31.702 General.       The OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200, subpart E and appendix IV, sets forth principles for determining the costs applicable to work performed by nonprofit organizations (as defined in the OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200) under contracts (as well as grants and other agreements) with the Government. See 31.108 for exceptions to the cost principles for nonprofit organizations.31.703 Requirements.       (a) 						            Contracts which refer to this subpart  31.7 for determining allowable costs shall be deemed to refer to, and shall have the allowability of costs determined by the contracting officer in accordance with, the OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200, subpart E and appendix IV in effect on the date of the contract.                                          (b) Agencies are not expected to place additional restrictions on individual items of cost. However, under                       10 U.S.C. 3744                                          and 41 U.S.C.4304, the costs cited in 31.603(b) are unallowable.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Case No. 3:20cr40-13/MCR

SAMANTHA O’BANION

______________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. 

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects 

mentioned in Rule 11, I determined the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary and 

the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of 

the essential elements thereof. I therefore recommend the plea of guilty be 

accepted and the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence imposed 

accordingly.

Dated: June 7, 2021.

/s/ Charles J. Kahn, Jr. 

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cr40-13/MCR

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be 

filed within twenty-four (24) hours of the date of the Report and 

Recommendation. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic 

docket is for the court’s internal use only and does not control. An objecting 

party must serve a copy of the objections on all other parties. A party who 

fails to object to the magistrate judge’s findings or recommendations contained 

in a report and recommendation waives the right to challenge on appeal the 

district court’s order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. 

See 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.
(January 8, 1980)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Steven Murdie, Appellant.

— Application for writ of habeas corpus denied on the ground such remedy does not lie to obtain release on bail pending appeal *(Matter of Lefkowitz v Ciofñ,*46 AD2d 473, 475). Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
32.501-3 Contract price.       (a) 						            For the purpose of making progress payments and determining the limitation on progress payments, the contract price shall be as follows:                                                         (1) 								                Under firm-fixed price contracts, the contract price is the current amount fixed by the contract plus the not-to-exceed amount for any unpriced modifications.                                                            (2) 								                If the contract is redeterminable or subject to economic price adjustment, the contract price is the initial price until modified.                                                            (3) 								                Under a fixed-price incentive contract, the contract price is the target price plus the not-to-exceed amount of unpriced modifications. However, if the contractor’s properly incurred costs exceed the target price, the contracting officer may provisionally increase the price up to the ceiling or maximum price.                                                            (4) 								                Under a letter contract, the contract price is the maximum amount obligated by the contract as modified.                                                            (5) 								                Under an unpriced order issued against a basic ordering agreement, the contract price is the maximum amount obligated by the order, as modified.                                                            (6) 								                Any portion of the contract specifically providing for reimbursement of costs only shall be excluded from the contract price.                                                                             (b) 						            The contracting officer shall not make progress payments or increase the contract price beyond the funds obligated under the contract, as amended.    **Parent topic:** 32.501 General.
**Exhibit 15.1**

**TIAN YUAN LAW FIRM**

**10/F, CPIC Plaza,**

**No. 28 FengSheng Hutong,**

**Xicheng District, Beijing, 100032,**

**P.R.China**

**Tel: (8610) 5776-3888;**

**Fax: (8610) 5776-3777.**

Date: October 12, 2012 

New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. 

No. 6 Hai Dian Zhong Street 

Haidian District, Beijing 100080 

People’s Republic of China 

Ladies andGentlemen: 

We hereby consent to the use of our name under the captions “Item 3.D—Key Information—RiskFactors,” “Item 4.B—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulation,” “Item 4.C—Information on the Company—Organizational Structure” and “Item 5.A—Operating and Financial Review andProspects—Critical Accounting Policies” and included in New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.’s annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012, which will be filed by New OrientalEducation & Technology Group Inc. on or after October 12, 2012, with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
#### § 51.905 Dried berries.

*Dried berries* means berries which are dry and shriveled to the extent that practically no moisture is present.

[36 FR 9126, May 20, 1971. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981. Redesignated at 56 FR 15802, Apr. 18, 1991]
§ 51.1541 U.S. No. 1. “U.S. No. 1” consists of potatoes which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Similar varietal characteristics, except when designated as a mixed or specialty pack;
( b ) Firm;
( c ) Fairly clean;[2]
( d ) Fairly well shaped;
( e ) Free from: ( 1 ) Freezing;
( 2 ) Blackheart;
( 3 ) Late blight, southern bacterial wilt and ring rot; and,
( 4 ) Soft rot and wet breakdown.
( f ) Free from damage by any other cause. See §§ 51.1564 and 51.1565.
( g ) Size. Not less than 17 ⁄ 8 inches in diameter, unless otherwise specified in connection with the grade.
( h ) For tolerances see § 51.1546.
[35 FR 18258, Dec. 1, 1970, as amended at 76 FR 31789, June 2, 2011] Footnotes -
51.1541
[2] Potatoes in containers bearing official State Seed Certification Tags and Seals are not required to be fairly clean but shall be free from damage by dirt.
```

[House Report 107-757]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-757

======================================================================

 
 WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO THE 
  SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES 
                               COMMITTEE

                                _______
                                

October 16 (legislative day, October 15), 2002.--Referred to the House 
                   Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 587]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 587, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee.
    The rule applies the waiver to any special rule reported on 
the legislative day of Wednesday, October 16, 2002, providing 
for the consideration or disposition of a joint resolution 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 
2003.
    The rule further applies the waiver to any special rule 
reported on the legislative day of Wednesday, October 16, 2002, 
providing for consideration or disposition of Senate amendments 
to the bill (H.R. 5063) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 to provide a special rule for members of the uniformed 
services in determining the exclusion of gain from the sale of 
a principal residence and to restore the tax exempt status of 
death gratuity payments to members of the uniformed services.

                                

```