alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Christopher Edwards, Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed and indictment reinstated. Memorandum: Defendant, an American Indian, was indicted for having committed within the territory of the Onondaga Indian Reservation the crimes of murder, robbery, assault and grand larceny. The indictment was dismissed by the court, *sua sport te,*at a motion term, upon the finding that "as a matter of law, the federal government has exclusive, jurisdiction over the crimes charged”. Initially, we reject defendant’s contention that the order dismissing the indictment is not appealable by the People. That the order was entered upon the court’s own motion and not upon motion of defendant does not divest the People of their historic right to appeal in circumstances where the order is entered before commencement of trial and finally determines the People’s case (see former Code Crim Pro, § 518). It is sufficient to preserve the People’s right to appeal under CPL 450.20 (subd 1), that the ground upon which the dismissal was based (CPL 210.20, subd 1, par [h]) is one upon which defendant was authorized to move for such relief (cf. *People v Coppa,*45 NY2d 244, 249-250). Turning to the merits, it is clear that the court erred in dismissing the indictment. While it was long recognized in New York that the Federal Government had exclusive jurisdiction to try Indians for crimes committed on Indian reservation lands *(People ex rel. Cusick v Daly,*212 NY 183; US Code, tit 18, § 1153), the power to assert jurisdiction in such cases was granted to New York in 1948 by the enactment of section 232 of title 25 of the United States Code *(Washington v Yakima Indian Nation,*439 US 463; *Oneida Indian Nation v County of Oneida,*414 US 661, 679; *Kake Vil. v Egan,*369 US 60, 73-74; *Williams v Lee,*358 US 217, 220-221; *United States v Devonian Gas & Oil Co.,*424 F2d 464, 468; *Anderson v Gladden,*188 F Supp 666, 677, affd 293 F2d 463; *People v Cook,*81 Misc 2d 235, 240-241). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court—dismiss indictment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Doerr and Moule, JJ. [104 Misc 2d 305.]
# L_2016330DE.01000801.xml

| 3.12.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 330/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 330/8

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1304/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 17. Dezember 2013 über den Europäischen Sozialfonds und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1081/2006 des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 347 vom 20. Dezember 2013
  )

| 1. | Seite „Inhalt“ und Seite 470, Titel |
| --- | --- |

1.

Seite „Inhalt“ und Seite 470, Titel

Anstatt:

„Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1304/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates 17. Dezember 2013 über den Europäischen Sozialfonds und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1081/2006 des Rates“

muss es heißen:

„Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1304/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 17. Dezember 2013 über den Europäischen Sozialfonds und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1081/2006 des Rates“.

| 2. | Seite 476, Artikel 5 Absatz 1 Unterabsätze 2 und 3 |
| --- | --- |

2.

Seite 476, Artikel 5 Absatz 1 Unterabsätze 2 und 3

Anstatt:

„Für die gemeinsamen und programmspezifischen Outputindikatoren werden die Ausgangswerte auf null gesetzt. Sofern es für die Art des unterstützten Vorhabens von Belang ist, werden für 2023 kumulative quantifizierte Zielwerte für diese Indikatoren für 2023 festgelegt. Outputindikatoren werden in absoluten Zahlen ausgedrückt.

Für diese gemeinsamen und programmspezifischen Ergebnisindikatoren, für die ein kumulativer quantifizierter Zielwert für 2023 festgelegt wurde, werden Ausgangswerte unter Verwendung der neuesten verfügbaren Daten oder anderer relevanter Informationsquellen festgelegt. Die programmspezifischen Ergebnisindikatoren und dazugehörigen Ziele können quantitativ oder qualitativ formuliert sein.“

muss es heißen:

„Für die gemeinsamen und programmspezifischen Outputindikatoren werden die Ausgangswerte auf Null gesetzt. Sofern es für die Art des unterstützten Vorhabens von Belang ist, werden für das Jahr 2023 kumulative quantifizierte Sollvorgaben für diese Indikatoren festgelegt. Outputindikatoren werden in absoluten Zahlen ausgedrückt.

Für diese gemeinsamen und programmspezifischen Ergebnisindikatoren, für die eine kumulative quantifizierte Sollvorgabe für 2023 festgelegt wurde, werden Ausgangswerte unter Verwendung der neuesten verfügbaren Daten oder anderer relevanter Informationsquellen festgelegt. Die programmspezifischen Ergebnisindikatoren und dazugehörigen Sollvorgaben können quantitativ oder qualitativ formuliert sein.“

| 3. | Seite 476, Artikel 5 Absatz 2 Satz 2 |
| --- | --- |

3.

Seite 476, Artikel 5 Absatz 2 Satz 2

Anstatt:

„Alle in Anhang II dieser Verordnung genannten Indikatoren werden mit einem kumulativen quantifizierten Zielwert für 2023 und einem Ausgangswert verknüpft.“

muss es heißen:

„Alle in Anhang II dieser Verordnung genannten Indikatoren werden mit einer kumulativen quantifizierten Sollvorgabe für 2023 und einem Ausgangswert verknüpft.“

---
#### In the Matter of Jack Weisz, Individually and as President of the New York Parole District Chapter of the Civil Service Employees Association, and as President of the New York State Parole Officers Association, Respondent, v. Department of Civil Service of the State of New York et al., Appellants.

Order entered December 14, 1966, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and the petition dismissed, with $50 costs and disbursements to the appellants. *Matter of Donohue*v. *Cornelius*(17 N Y 2d 390) makes clear that petitioner was not a party aggrieved and had no standing to maintain this article 78 proceeding. Since petitioner never had standing to sue, he may not invoke the doctrine (see *Matter of Adirondack League Club*v. *Board of Black Riv. Regulating Dist.,*301 N. Y. 219, 222, 223) that permits *915a court in appropriate circumstances to determine questions arising in properly instituted proceedings which, subsequently become moot between the parties. Accordingly we do not pass on the merits of the petition. Concur — Botein, P. J., Steuer, Capozzoli, Tilzer and Witmer, JJ.
§ 51.1141 U.S. Fancy. “U.S. Fancy” consists of oranges which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Basic requirements: ( 1 ) Discoloration: Not more than one-tenth of the surface, in the aggregate, may be affected by discoloration. (See § 51.1161.);
( 2 ) Firm;
( 3 ) Mature;
( 4 ) Similar varietal characteristics;
( 5 ) Smooth texture;
( 6 ) Well colored; and,
( 7 ) Well formed.
( b ) Free from: ( 1 ) Ammoniation;
( 2 ) Buckskin;
( 3 ) Caked melanose;
( 4 ) Creasing;
( 5 ) Decay;
( 6 ) Scab;
( 7 ) Split navels;
( 8 ) Sprayburn;
( 9 ) Undeveloped segments;
( 10 ) Unhealed skin breaks; and,
( 11 ) Wormy fruit.
( c ) Free from injury caused by: ( 1 ) Bruises;
( 2 ) Green spots;
( 3 ) Oil spots;
( 4 ) Rough, wide or protruding navels;
( 5 ) Scale;
( 6 ) Scars;
( 7 ) Skin breakdown; and,
( 8 ) Thorn scratches.
( d ) Free from damage caused by: ( 1 ) Dirt or other foreign material;
( 2 ) Disease;
( 3 ) Dryness or mushy condition;
( 4 ) Hail;
( 5 ) Insects;
( 6 ) Riciness or woodiness;
( 7 ) Sunburn; and,
( 8 ) Other means.
( e ) For tolerances see § 51.1151.
( f ) Internal quality: Lots meeting the internal requirements for “U.S. Grade AA Juice (Double A)” or “U.S. Grade A Juice” may be so specified in connection with the grade. (See §§ 51.1176-51.1179.)
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2312 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to change the 

numerical identifier used to identify Medicare beneficiaries under the 

Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2006 

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

to change the numerical identifier used to identify Medicare beneficiaries under the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Num5 ber Protection Act of 2006’’. 
2 

•S 2312 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRING THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

2 HUMAN SERVICES TO CHANGE THE NUMER3 ICAL IDENTIFIER USED TO IDENTIFY MEDI4 CARE BENEFICIARIES UNDER THE MEDICARE 

5 PROGRAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health 

8 and Human Services shall establish and implement proce9 dures to change the numerical identifier used to identify 

10 individuals entitled to benefits under part A of title XVIII 

11 of the Social Security Act or enrolled under part B of such 

12 title so that such an individual’s social security account 

13 number is not displayed on the identification card issued 

14 to the individual under the Medicare program under such 

15 title or on any explanation of Medicare benefits mailed to 

16 the individual. 

17 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

18 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 

19 necessary to carry out this section. 

Æ
33.101 Definitions.

As used in this subpartDay means a calendar day, unless otherwise specified. In the computation of any period-

(1) The day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run is not

included; and

(2) The last day after the act, event, or default is included unless-

(i) The last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday; or

(ii) In the case of a filing of a paper at any appropriate administrative forum, the last day is a day on

which weather or other conditions cause the closing of the forum for all or part of the day, in which

event the next day on which the appropriate administrative forum is open is included.

Filed means the complete receipt of any document by an agency before its close of business.

Documents received after close of business are considered filed as of the next day. Unless otherwise

stated, the agency close of business is presumed to be 4:30 p.m., local time.

Interested party for the purpose of filing a protest means an actual or prospective offeror whose

direct economic interest would be affected by the award of a contract or by the failure to award a

contract.

Protest means a written objection by an interested party to any of the following:

(1) A solicitation or other request by an agency for offers for a contract for the procurement of

property or services.

(2) The cancellation of the solicitation or other request.

(3) An award or proposed award of the contract.

(4) A termination or cancellation of an award of the contract, if the written objection contains an

allegation that the termination or cancellation is based in whole or in part on improprieties

concerning the award of the contract.

Protest venue means protests filed with the agency, the Government Accountability Office, or the

U.S. Court of Federal Claims. U.S. District Courts do not have any bid protest jurisdiction.

Parent topic: Subpart 33.1 - Protests
**Exhibit 99.1**

**A BANKER’S PROFESSIONAL CODE OF ETHICS**

No profession or industry has maintained higher standards of conductnor provided greater public service than the Banking industry. Banks have traditionally recognized their duty to act in a manner of public trust and confidence. This has never been more important than it is today. Due to the events ofSeptember 11, 2001, banks have become partners with the federal government in fighting the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities. Each employee is required to abide by the spirit and letter of these anti terrorism laws andregulations. 

A Banker’s reputation for integrity is perhaps its most valuable asset and is determined by the conduct of its officers and employees.Each of us must strive to avoid situations that raise questions of ethics between the staff member and the Bank, or its shareholders or customers. The following is our Bank’s official policy. All officers and employees are expected to adhere toboth the letter and the spirit of this policy. Exceptions will require prior written approval by the president. All staff members are expected to comply with the provisions of the Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest policies discussed in thishandbook. 

All officers, directors and employees must provide accurate and timely disclosure of information necessary for the bank’s requiredregulatory reporting. Officers, directors and employees are obligated to report activities which s/he reasonably believes violate laws and/or regulations pertaining to our bank. 

Confidential information acquired through the course of employment about the Bank and its customers and suppliers is to be used solely for banking purposes and not a basis for furthering a private interest or as ameans of personal gain. 

A staff member may not seek, gain access to, nor disclose confidential information of customers or Bank employees for anyunauthorized purpose. This includes credit information, account data and any other confidential information possessed by the Bank. Disclosure of such information to other Bank personnel should be kept to a minimum on a need-to-know basis. Adherenceto the bank’s privacy policy is essential with regard to nonpublic information about our customers and employees. 

Our customers must have completetrust in our ability to handle confidential information. Should you have a request for information which you are not authorized to release, refer that request to your supervisor or a bank officer. 

In summary, all staff members must conduct themselves in a way that will reflect positively on the Bank and will enhance the confidence of our customers in our abilityto effectively work for them and for the betterment of the communities which we serve.
Summary of 2009 Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Summary of Director Compensation 
 In December 2008, the Board of Directors approved the following Board compensation effective
January 1, 2009: 
  

	 	•	 	 an annual retainer of $57,000 for non Chairman members, and $157,000 for the Chairman (which includes the $57,000 retainer paid to non-Chairman members, the $25,000
additional retainer paid to the Chairman in 2008 and prior years, and $75,000 in lieu of the additional stock option grant which the Chairman received in addition to the standard grant made to all non-employee directors in prior years), each paid
quarterly; 


  

	 	•	 	 an annual retainer of $20,000 for service as the Audit Committee Chairman and the Compensation Committee Chairman, paid quarterly; 


  

	 	•	 	 an annual retainer of $10,000 for service as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman and the Compliance and Quality Committee Chairman;



  

	 	•	 	 a restricted stock award having a value of $183,000 based on sixty day trailing average market price of the company’s common stock, awarded in January of each
year and vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date; and 


  

	 	•	 	 a stock option grant to purchase shares of common stock equivalent to $122,000 calculated using the Black-Scholes model, typically granted upon re-election to the
Board. Each stock option has an exercise price equal to the closing price of the stock on the date of grant and vests in four equal quarterly installments over one year.
32.610 Compromising debts.

For debts under $100,000, excluding interest, the designated agency official may compromise the

debt pursuant to the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR part 902) and agency regulations.

Unless specifically authorized by agency procedures, contracting officers cannot compromise debts.

Parent topic: Subpart 32.6 - Contract Debts
```

[House Report 107-756]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-756

======================================================================

 
 WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO THE 
  SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES 
                               COMMITTEE

                                _______
                                

  October 15, 2002.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 586]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 586, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver 
to any special rule reported on the legislative day of 
Wednesday, October 16, 2002, providing for the consideration or 
disposition of a joint resolution making further continuing 
appropriations for the fiscal year 2003.

                                

```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. HORATIO MANDUS NIMLEY, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 340 MAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 29th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
27.405-4 Other existing data.       (a) 						            Except for existing works pursuant to 27.405-2 or commercial computer software pursuant to 27.405-3, no clause contained in this subpart is required to be included in-                                                         (1) 								                Contracts solely for the acquisition of books, periodicals, and other printed items in the exact form in which these items are to be obtained unless reproduction rights are to be acquired; or                                                            (2) 								                Other contracts that require only existing data (other than limited rights data) to be delivered and the data are available without disclosure prohibitions, unless reproduction rights to the data are to be obtained.                                                                             (b) 						            If the reproduction rights to the data are to be obtained in any contract of the type described in paragraph (b)(1) (i) or (ii) of this section, the rights shall be specifically set forth in the contract. No clause contained in this subpart is required to be included in contracts substantially for on-line data base services in the same form as they are normally available to the general public.    **Parent topic:** 27.405 Other data rights provisions.
46.202-4 Higher-level contract quality requirements.       (a) 						            Agencies shall establish procedures for determining when higher-level contract quality requirements are necessary, for determining the risk (both the likelihood and the impact) of nonconformance, and for advising the contracting officer about which higher-level standards should be applied and included in the solicitation and contract. Requiring compliance with higher-level quality standards is necessary in solicitations and contracts for complex or critical items (see 46.203)or when the technical requirements of the contract require-                                                         (1) 								                Control of such things as design, work operations, in-process controls, testing, and inspection; or                                                            (2) 								                Attention to such factors as organization, planning, work instructions, documentation control, and advanced metrology.                                                                             (b) 						            Examples of higher-level quality standards include overarching quality management system standards such as ISO 9001, ASQ/ANSI E4, ASME NQA-1, SAE AS9100, SAE AS9003, and ISO/TS 16949, and product or process specific quality standards such as SAE AS5553.    **Parent topic:** 46.202 Types of contract quality requirements.
| WARNING: If you can read this message, your browser is not Javascript enabled! Without Javascript enabled, you will not receive the benefit of the graphically enhanced interface and may have difficulties using this site. Please enable scripting or upgrade your browser. The appearance of hyperlinks to external websites within this site in no way constitutes our endorsement of the information, products or services the external sites provide. |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

||
||
29.401 Domestic contracts.

29.401-1 Indefinite-delivery contracts for leased equipment.

29.401-2 Construction contracts performed in North Carolina.

29.401-3 Federal, State, and local taxes.

29.401-4 New Mexico gross receipts and compensating tax.

Parent topic: Subpart 29.4 - Contract Clauses