alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





Board of Directors
Peoples Bank Corporation of Indianapolis
Indianapolis, Indiana



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form S-8 (Reg.  33- 98772) of Peoples Bank  Corporation of  Indianapolis  of our
Independent  Auditor's  Report,  dated  February 14, 1997,  on the  consolidated
balance sheets of Peoples Bank  Corporation of  Indianapolis  as of December 31,
1995  and  1996  and  on the  consolidated  statements  of  income,  changes  in
shareholders'  equity and cash  flows for each of the three  years in the period
ended  December 31, 1996,  which report is included in Form 10-K of Peoples Bank
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1996.



                                               /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                   Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP



Indianapolis, Indiana
March 28, 1997
#### § 51.1584 Internal discoloration.

*Internal discoloration* means discoloration such as is caused by net necrosis or any other type of necrosis, stem-end browning, internal brown spot, or other similar types of discoloration not visible externally.
#### In the Matter of Alma K. Fili, Respondent, v. Salvatore P. Fili, Appellant.

-Order entered on April 19, 1966, granting petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR 3102 (subd. [c]) to take the oral deposition of respondent and to examine the books and records of J. F. N. Associates, Inc., a corporation of which respondent is an officer and an owner of a substantial stock interest, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to respondent-appellant, and the application is denied. This application is virtually identical with one made by petitioner before Mr. Justice Aurelio which was denied by him by order dated June 2, 1964, from which no appeal was taken. It is more in the nature of a motion to renew or reargue the previous application rather than a new application, and thus it should have been made to Mr. Justice Aurelio (CPLR 2221; *Ecco High Frequency Corp.*v. *Amtorg Trading Corp.,*81 N. Y. S., 2d 897, affd. 274 App. Div. 982; 2 Carmody-Wait 2d, New York Practice, § 8:73-8:83). Moreover, on the merits petitioner fails to make a case for the requested examination, because she rests it on suspicion only *(Stewart*v. *Socony Vacuum Oil Co.,*3 A D 2d 582; *Kenerson*V. *Davis,*278 App. Div. 482). Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, McNally, McGivern and Witmer, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Jack L. Messman, Chief Executive Officer of Novell, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby
certify that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



* * *



|                       
|-----------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
|                       
|/s/ JACK L. MESSMAN    
|Jack L. Messman        
|                       
|Date: June 8, 2005
#### § 500.10 Pets.

Pets brought upon USNA property must have proper vaccinations and, except assistance trained animals, must be kept on leash at all times. The release or abandonment of fish, plants, and animals of any kind on USNA grounds is prohibited.
§ 51.57 Facilities. Each packing plant shall be equipped with adequate sanitary facilities and accommodations, including but not being limited to the following: ( a ) There shall be a sufficient number of adequately lighted toilet rooms, ample in size and conveniently located. Toilet rooms shall be adequately screened and equipped with self-closing doors, and shall have independent outside ventilation;
( b ) Adequate lavatory accommodations and supplies shall be placed at such locations in or near toilet rooms as to insure the cleanliness of each person who grades or handles the product to be inspected; and
( c ) Suitable facilities for cleaning shall be provided at convenient locations in the plant.
25.200 Scope of subpart.

(a) This subpart implements-

(1) 41 U.S.C. chapter 83, Buy American;

(2) Executive Order 10582, December 17, 1954;

(3) Executive Order 13881, July 15, 2019;

(4) Executive Order 14005, January 25, 2021; and

(5) Waiver of the domestic content test of the Buy American statute for acquisitions of commercially

available off-the-shelf (COTS) items in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1907, but see 25.201(b)(2)(ii).

(b) It applies to contracts for the construction, alteration, or repair of any public building or public

work in the United States.

(c) When using funds appropriated or otherwise provided by the American Recovery and

Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5) (Recovery Act) for construction, see subpart 25.6.

Parent topic: Subpart 25.2 - Buy American-Construction Materials
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2017

s0926 

# Order

Clerk September 29, 2017

154370

_________________________________________

In re Estate of JAMES ERWIN, SR. SC: 154370

COA: 331846

Saginaw PC: 13

- 130558

- DE

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 6, 2016 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

th at the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No.: 5:03cr33/MCR and

5:09cv135/MCR/MD

DAVID E. MARTINELLI

 /

O R D E R

This matter is before the court on the interlocutory appeal of the magistrate judge’s

order denying defendant’s motion to disqualify Assistant United States Attorney Dixie

Morrow from further representation of the government in this matter. (See doc. 369). 

Defendant alleges the magistrate judge exceeded his authority under 28 § 636(b) by ruling

on the motion rather than submitting a report and recommendation to the undersigned

district judge for a dispositive ruling. Additionally, defendant contests entry of the “boilerplate” order without setting forth any findings of fact or conclusions of law in support of the

decision, and without a response from the government. 

Pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, magistrate judges have

authority to decide nondispositive issues, which decisions should, when appropriate, be

memorialized in a written order. Numerous courts have held, and this court agrees, that

1

a motion to disqualify counsel is a nondispositive issue. See e.g., Vecc, Inc. v. Bank of

Nova Scotia, 222 F.Supp.2d 717 (D.Virgin Islands 2002); Mruz v. Caring, Inc., 166

F.Supp.2d 61 (D.N.J. 2001); Howe Investment, Ltd. v. Perez Y Cia. De Puerto Rico, Inc.,

96 F.Supp. 106 (D. Puerto Rico 2000); Estate of Jones ex rel. Gay v. Beverly Health and

Furthermore, the local rules of this court specifically provide that cases seeking post-trial or post1

conviction relief shall be referred by the clerk to a magistrate judge for all proceedings, including preliminary

orders, ... . See N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 72.2(B).

Case 5:03-cr-00033-MCR-CJK Document 375 Filed 07/09/09 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Rehabilitation Services, Inc., 68 F.Supp.2d 1304 (N.D.Fla. 1999); Gray v. Rhode Island

Dept. Of Children, Youth and Families, 937 F.Supp. 153 (D.R.I. 1996).

The court finds that under the circumstances presented the magistrate judge’s order

denying defendant’s motion to disqualify government counsel did not require findings of

fact and conclusions of law. The undersigned has conducted a de novo review of the

matter and agrees with the magistrate judge’s ruling, which is now AFFIRMED. The clerk

shall refer this matter to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED this 9th day of July, 2009.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 5:03cr33/MCR / Case No.: 5:09cv135/MCR/MD

Case 5:03-cr-00033-MCR-CJK Document 375 Filed 07/09/09 Page 2 of 2
§ 51.1400 U.S. Extra Fancy. “U.S. Extra Fancy” consists of pecans in the shell which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Free from loose extraneous or foreign material.
( b ) Shells are: ( 1 ) Uniform in color; and
( 2 ) Free from damage by any cause.
( c ) Kernels are: ( 1 ) Well developed;
( 2 ) Well cured;
( 3 ) Moisture content shall be not more than 6 percent, unless otherwise specified;
( 4 ) Uniform in color and not darker than “light;” and
( 5 ) Free from damage by any cause.
( d ) For tolerances see § 51.1406.
#### § 503.13 Weapons and explosives.

No person while in or on the PIADC shall carry firearms or other dangerous or deadly weapons or explosives either openly or concealed, except when authorized to do so for official purposes by the Director, PIADC, or his authorized representative.
4.2103 Procedures.

(a) Representations.

(1)

(i) If the offeror selects "does not" in paragraphs (c)(1) and/or (c)(2) of the provision at 52.204-26 or

in paragraphs (v)(2)(i) and/or (v)(2)(ii) of the provision at 52.212-3, the contracting officer may rely

on the "does not" representation(s), unless the contracting officer has reason to question the

representation. If the contracting officer has a reason to question the representation, the contracting

officer shall follow agency procedures.

(ii) If the offeror selects "does" in paragraph (c)(1) of the provision at 52.204-26 or paragraph

(v)(2)(i) of the provision at 52.212-3, the offeror will be required to complete the representation in

paragraph (d)(1) of the provision at 52.204-24.

(iii) If the offeror selects "does" in paragraph (c)(2) of the provision at 52.204-26 or paragraph

(v)(2)(ii) of the provision at 52.212-3, the offeror will be required to complete the representation in

paragraph (d)(2) of the provision at 52.204-24.

(2)

(i) If the offeror selects "will not" in paragraph (d)(1) of the provision at 52.204-24 or "does not" in

paragraph (d)(2) of the provision at 52.204-24, the contracting officer may rely on the

representations, unless the contracting officer has reason to question the representations. If the

contracting officer has a reason to question the representations, the contracting officer shall follow

agency procedures.

(ii) If an offeror selects "will" in paragraph (d)(1) of the provision at 52.204-24, the offeror must

provide the information required by paragraph (e)(1) of the provision at 52.204-24, and the

contracting officer shall follow agency procedures.

(iii) If an offeror selects "does" in paragraph (d)(2) of the provision at 52.204-24, the offeror must

complete the disclosure at paragraph (e)(2) of the provision at 52.204-24, and the contracting officer

shall follow agency procedures.

(b) Reporting. If a contractor provides a report pursuant to paragraph (d) of the clause at 52.204-25,

Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or

Equipment, follow agency procedures.

Parent topic: Subpart 4.21 Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video

Surveillance Services or Equipment
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7835

KEVIN M. BALLANCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAGE TRUE, Warden, S1SP; GENE JOHNSON, Assistant Director; SERGEANT BYRD, Property Sergeant; INVESTIGATOR SMITH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-1263-AM) Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 23, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin M. Ballance, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kevin M. Ballance appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. SeeBallance v. True , No. CA-03-1263-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 17. 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
22.1009-4 All possible places of performance

not identified.

If the contracting officer believes that there may be offerors interested in performing in unidentified

places or areas, the contracting officer may use the following procedures:

(a) Include the following information in the synopsis and solicitation:

(1) That the place of performance is unknown.

(2) The possible places or areas of performance that the contracting officer has already identified.

(3) That the contracting officer will obtain wage determinations for additional possible places of

performance if asked to do so in writing.

(4) The time and date by which offerors must notify the contracting officer of additional places of

performance.

(b) Include the information required by paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(4) of this section in the clause at

52.222-49, Service Contract Labor Standards–Place of Performance Unknown (see 22.1006(f)). The

closing date for receipt of offerors’ requests for wage determinations for additional possible places

of performance should allow reasonable time for potential offerors to review the solicitation and

determine their interest in competing. Generally, 10 to 15 days from the date of issuance of the

solicitation may be considered a reasonable period of time.

(c) The procedures in 14.304 shall apply to late receipt of offerors’ requests for wage determinations

for additional places of performance. However, late receipt of an offeror’s request for a wage

determination for additional places of performance does not preclude the offeror’s competing for the

proposed acquisition.

(d) If the contracting officer receives any timely requests for wage determinations for additional

places of performance the contracting officer shall-

(1) Obtain wage determinations for the additional places of performance; and

(2) Amend the solicitation to include all wage determinations and, if necessary, extend the time for

submission of final offers.

(e) If the successful offeror did not make a timely request for a wage determination and will perform

in a place of performance for which the contracting officer therefore did not request a wage

determination, the contracting officer shall-

(1) Award the contract;

(2) Obtain a wage determination; and

(3) Incorporate the wage determination in the contract, retroactive to the date of contract award and

with no adjustment in contract price, pursuant to the clause at 52.222-49, Service Contract Labor

Standards–Place of Performance Unknown.
Parent topic: 22.1009 Place of performance unknown.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 242

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to carry out a study

to determine the suitability and feasibility of establishing

memorials to the Space Shuttle Columbia on parcels

of land in the State of Texas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Columbia Space Shut5 tle Memorial Study Act of 2005’’.
 †

2

S 242 ES

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

2 In this Act:

3 (1) MEMORIAL.—The term ‘‘memorial’’ means

4 a memorial to the Space Shuttle Columbia the suit5 ability and feasibility of the establishment of which

6 is a subject of the study under section 3(a).

7 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means

8 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di9 rector of the National Park Service.

10 SEC. 3. STUDY OF SUITABILITY AND FEASIBILITY OF ES11 TABLISHING MEMORIALS TO THE SPACE

12 SHUTTLE COLUMBIA.

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years after the

14 date on which funds are made available to carry out this

15 Act, the Secretary shall carry out a study to determine

16 the suitability and feasibility of establishing, as units of

17 the National Park System on land in the State of Texas

18 described in subsection (b) (on which large debris from

19 the Space Shuttle Columbia was recovered), memorials to

20 the Space Shuttle Columbia.

21 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcels of land re22 ferred to in subsection (a) are—

23 (1) the parcel of land owned by the Fredonia

24 Corporation, located at the southeast corner of the

25 intersection of East Hospital Street and North Fre26 donia Street, Nacogdoches, Texas;
†

3

S 242 ES

1 (2) the parcel of land owned by Temple Inland

2 Inc., 10 acres of a 61-acre tract bounded by State

3 Highway 83 and Bayou Bend Road, Hemphill,

4 Texas;

5 (3) the parcel of land owned by the city of

6 Lufkin, Texas, located at City Hall Park, 301

7 Charlton Street, Lufkin, Texas; and

8 (4) the parcel of land owned by San Augustine

9 County, Texas, located at 1109 Oaklawn Street, San

10 Augustine, Texas.

11 (c) ADMINISTRATION.—In carrying out the study, the

12 Secretary shall assume that, if established after comple13 tion of the study, each memorial shall be administered by

14 the Secretary.

15 (d) ADDITIONAL SITES.—The Secretary may rec16 ommend to Congress additional sites in the State of Texas

17 relating to the Space Shuttle Columbia for establishment

18 as memorials to the Space Shuttle Columbia.
†

4

S 242 ES

1 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

2 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec3 essary to carry out this Act.

Passed the Senate November 16, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 242

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to carry out

of Texas.Shuttle Columbia on parcels of land in the Statebility of establishing memorials to the Spacea study to determine the suitability and feasi-
36.508 Other contracts.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-8, Other Contracts, in solicitations and

contracts when a fixed-price construction contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or

removal of improvements contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed

the simplified acquisition threshold. The contracting officer may insert the clause in solicitations and

contracts when a fixed-price construction or a fixed-price contract for dismantling, demolition, or

removal of improvements is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to be at or below the

simplified acquisition threshold.

Parent topic: Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000

18 12 06 00 08/15 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 15 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
36.501 Performance of work by the

contractor.

(a) To assure adequate interest in and supervision of all work involved in larger projects, the

contractor shall be required to perform a significant part of the contract work with its own forces.

The contract shall express this requirement in terms of a percentage that reflects the minimum

amount of work the contractor must perform with its own forces. This percentage is (1) as high as

the contracting officer considers appropriate for the project, consistent with customary or necessary

specialty subcontracting and the complexity and magnitude of the work, and (2) ordinarily not less

than 12 percent unless a greater percentage is required by law or agency regulation. Specialties

such as plumbing, heating, and electrical work are usually subcontracted, and should not normally

be considered in establishing the amount of work required to be performed by the contractor.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-1, Performance of Work by the

Contractor, in solicitations and contracts, except those awarded pursuant to subparts 19.5, 19.8,

19.13, 19.14, or 19.15 when a fixed-price construction contract is contemplated and the contract

amount is expected to exceed $1.5 million. The contracting officer may insert the clause in

solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract is contemplated and the contract

amount is expected to be $1.5 million or less.

Parent topic: Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
# 42.802 Contract clause.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.242-1, Notice of Intent to Disallow Costs, in *solicitations* and contracts when a cost-reimbursement contract, a fixed-price incentive contract, or a contract providing for price redetermination is contemplated.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 42.8 - Disallowance of Costs
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2352 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2352

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 
                               equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2006

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 
                               equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.84.81 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain manufacturing 
equipment) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/
2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```