alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 74711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30156]



[[Page 74711]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-2069-000]


Duke Energy Lee II, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

November 23, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Duke Energy Lee II, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is December 13, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e383b2c3d31101217101b2d0b0e0e110c0a3e181b0c1d50191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a2c2f382925040603040f391f1a1a05181e2a0c0f1809440d051c">[email protected]</span></a> 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30156 Filed 11-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.1





EXHIBIT 10.1


SUMMARY OF 2009 BONUS AWARD
ARRANGEMENT


On March 24 and
March 26, 2009, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors of
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the
performance award for Daniel R. Lee, the Company’s Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer, for 2009 in lieu of a bonus under
Mr. Lee’s employment agreement for 2009. Pursuant to the performance
award, Mr. Lee is entitled to earn a bonus equal to 1.25% of the
Company’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization
(subject to adjustments contemplated in the Company’s 2005 Equity and
Performance Incentive Plan, as amended) (“Adjusted Plan EBITDA”)
but not to exceed the lesser of: (i) 175% of his annual base salary; or
(ii) the amount determined based on the achievement of specified Adjusted
Plan EBITDA targets up to 100% of his annual salary and other leadership and
development goals established by the Compensation Committee up to 75% of his
annual salary. The performance award was granted under the Company’s 2005
Equity and Performance Incentive Plan, as amended.


The Company
contemplates that Mr. Lee’s performance award and the bonus paid
thereunder will qualify as “performance-based” compensation under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Faust Blasetti, Appellant.

On the court’s motion, the notice of appeal and the order of this court dated January 22, 1968 which assigned counsel to prosecute the appeal are amended to show that the appeal is from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, dated November 27, 1967. It appears that that was the order intended to be appealed from; and both sides briefed the appeal as being from that order. (Code Crim. Pro., § 524-c.) Order dated November 27, 1967 affirmed. No opinion. Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KIMBERLY GRIPPA, CASE NO. _______________

Plaintiff,

vs.

RONALD RUBIN,

Defendant.

____________________________/

DECLARATION OF RONALD RUBIN 

I, Ronald Rubin, hereby declare and state as follows:

1. I am over eighteen years of age, of sound mind, and suffer from no

disease or defect that would render me incompetent to make this declaration. The 

facts set forth in this declaration are based on my personal knowledge.

2. In August 2019, I moved my residence from Florida to the District of

Columbia. 

3. I intend to remain in the District of Columbia indefinitely.

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing document 

and that the facts stated in it are true.

Executed September 15, 2020.

___________________________

Ronald Rubin

EXHIBIT 1

Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 09/18/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, William Lieberman, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Fox Petroleum Inc. hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fox Petroleum Inc. for the period ended May 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Fox Petroleum Inc.





Date: July 27, 2010





/s/   William LiebermanWilliam Lieberman



President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Fox Petroleum Inc. and will be retained by Fox Petroleum Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 550.118 Peer review.

Upon request of the REE Agency, Cooperators may be required to provide documentation in support of peer review activities, and Cooperator's personnel may be requested to participate in peer review forums to assist the REE Agency with their reviews.
36.609-2 Redesign responsibility for design

errors or deficiencies.

(a) Under architect-engineer contracts, contractors shall be required to make necessary corrections

at no cost to the Government when the designs, drawings, specifications, or other items or services

furnished contain any errors, deficiencies, or inadequacies. If, in a given situation, the Government

does not require a firm to correct such errors, the contracting officer shall include a written

statement of the reasons for that decision in the contract file.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-23, Responsibility of the ArchitectEngineer Contractor, in fixed-price architect-engineer contracts.

Parent topic: 36.609 Contract clauses.
§ 319.7-5 Appeal of denial or revocation. ( a ) All denials of an application for a permit, or revocations of an existing permit, will be provided in writing, including by electronic methods, as promptly as circumstances permit and will include the reasons for the denial or revocation.
( b ) Any person whose application for a permit has been denied or whose permit has been revoked may appeal the decision in writing to APHIS within 10 business days from the date the communication of notification of the denial or revocation of the permit was received. The appeal must state all facts and reasons upon which the person is relying to show that the denial or revocation was incorrect.
( c ) APHIS will grant or deny the appeal in writing and will state in writing the reason for the decision. The denial or revocation will remain in effect during the resolution of the appeal.
§ 51.3051 U.S. Combination. “U.S. Combination” consists of a combination of U.S. No. 1 and U.S. No. 2 avocados: *Provided,* That at least 60 percent, by count, of the avocados in each container meet the requirements of the U.S. No. 1 grade. ( a ) *Tolerances.* In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, not more than a total of 10 percent, by count, of the avocados in any lot may fail to meet the requirements of the U.S. No. 2 grade: *Provided,* That not more than one-half of this amount, or 5 percent, shall be allowed for avocados affected by decay or seriously damaged by anthracnose, including therein not more than 1 percent for avocados affected by decay. No part of any tolerance shall be allowed to reduce for the lot as a whole the percentage of U.S. No. 1 fruit required or specified in the combination, but individual containers may have not more than 10 percent less than the percentage of U.S. No. 1 fruit required or specified. (See §§ 51.3055 and 51.3056.)
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott Macleod, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                                                  |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Scott Macleod                                     |
| Scott Macleod                                         |
| Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer |

November 10, 2008
### NUMBER 13 - 1 4 - 00 715 - CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ CARLOS GUTIERREZ , A ppellant ,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee
.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 105 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Ro driguez and Garza Order Per Curiam Appellant, Carlos Gutierrez , has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his conviction in trial court cause number 13

- CR

- 1766

- D . The trial court's certification of the defendant's right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have the right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2).2

On December 16, 2014 , we ordered appellant's counsel, Gabi S. Canal e s , to, within t hirty days, review the record and advise this Court as to whether appellant has a right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 44.3, 44.4. No response to this Court's order has been received. Therefore, we ABATE this appeal and REMAND this cause to the trial

co urt for a hearing to determine why counsel has failed to comply with this Court's order. The trial court's findings and conclusions shall be included in a supplemental clerk's record. The trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and reporte r's record, if any, with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days of the date of this order. If the trial court determines that counsel is unable to represent appellant in this matter, the trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellan t desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether appellant is entitled to appointed counsel. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 83

- 84 (1988); Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding these issues. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to pursue this appeal, is indigent, and is entitled to appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel. If co unsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed the 4th day of February , 20 1 5

.3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JAMES L. GIBSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:20cv467-MW/MAF

DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMIN.,

et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation, ECF No. 3. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, as this Court’s 

opinion. This case is transferred to the Western District of Virginia. The Clerk shall 

take all necessary steps to effect the transfer and close the file. 

SO ORDERED on October 27, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00467-MW-MAF Document 4 Filed 10/27/20 Page 1 of 1
#### § 502.16 Penalties and other law.

Whoever shall be found guilty of violating the rules and regulations in this part is subject to fine of not more than $50 or imprisonment of not more than 30 days, or both (see 40 U.S.C. 318c). Nothing contained in the rules and regulations in this part shall be construed as abrogating or authorizing the abrogation of any other regulations or any Federal law or any laws and regulations of the State of Maryland.

[37 FR 2424, Feb. 1, 1972. Redesignated at 61 FR 51212, Oct. 1, 1996]
#### §§ 4279.3-4279.14 [Reserved]
#### Sanford Aroneck et al., Appellants, v Morris Atkin et al., Respondents.

— Order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We affirm because plaintiffs have not demonstrated that they have an interest in the litigation; nor have they made a showing of special or extraordinary circumstances *(Gardner v Fyr-Fyter Co.,*55 AD2d 816). All concur, except Callahan, J., who dissents and votes to reverse the order and grant the motion, in the following memorandum.

Callahan, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. In my view it was an improvident exercise of judicial discretion to deny an application for all potential parties to be included thereby permitting a determination at one trial of all the pending and probable issues inherent in this lawsuit. Leave to amend pleadings “shall be freely given” absent prejudice or surprise resulting directly from a delay (CPLR 3025, subd [b]; *Fahey v County of Ontario,*44 NY2d 934, revg 55 AD2d 1034). CPLR 3025 (subd [b]) contains no time limit and the motion may be made at any time. It was not only proper but necessary for new counsel to make the motion herein rather than waiting until the eve of trial or making application before the court during the course of trial (see *Gardner v Fyr-Fyter Co., supra). A*review of the record discloses that unnamed parties have a probable interest and could be necessary to the disposition of the issues in the course of one trial. It is in the interest of justice and judicial economy that this motion was made. It was therefore improper to deny the application where no *981surprise or prejudice is present. CPLR 3025 (subd [b]) was specifically designed to accommodate the application made herein. (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court — amend complaint.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Moule, JJ.
# 17.200 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for the use of *option**solicitation* provisions and *contract clauses*. Except as provided in agency regulations, this subpart does not apply to contracts for (a) services involving the *construction*, alteration, or repair (including dredging, excavating, and painting) of buildings, bridges, roads, or other kinds of real property; (b) *architect-engineer services*; and (c) research and development services. However, it does not preclude the use of *options* in those contracts.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 17.2 - Options
EXHIBIT 

31.2 

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, George Lefevre, certify that: 

> 
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of EntreMetrixCorporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2005.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the quarterly report;and 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theCompany as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report. 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such		disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,		to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including		its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within		those entities, particularly during the period in which the quarterly		report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls		and procedures and presented in the quarterly report our conclusions		about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of		the end of the period covered by the quarterly report based on such		evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in the quarterly report any change in the Company's		internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the		Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is		reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control		over financial reporting; 

> 
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theCompany's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions); 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of		internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to		record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified		for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;		and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or		other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal		controls over financial reporting. 

 

| Dated: May 17, 2005 |  By: /s/ George Lefevre               |
|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|           |        George Lefevre, Chief Financial		Officer                                    |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Novell, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended
April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Dana C. Russell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * *



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dana C. Russell                              
|Dana C. Russell                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date:
June 8, 2010
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2537 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to employee protective 

arrangements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2013 

Mr. GINGREY of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to 

employee protective arrangements, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EMPLOYEE PROTECTIVE ARRANGEMENTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5333 of title 49, United 

5 States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘(a) PREVAILING WAGES RE7 QUIREMENT.—’’; and 

8 (2) by striking subsection (b). 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2537 IH

1 (1) FORMULA GRANTS FOR RURAL AREAS.— 

2 Section 5311(i) of title 49, United States Code, is 

3 repealed. 

4 (2) ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS.—Section 

5 5334(a)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘(except terms the Secretary of 

7 Labor prescribes under section 5333(b) of this 

8 title)’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS