alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 352.3 Enforcement and administration. ( a ) Plants, plant products, plant pests, biological control organisms, noxious weeds, soil, and other products and articles subject to the regulations in this part that are unloaded, landed, or otherwise brought or moved into or through the United States in violation of this part may be seized, destroyed, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with section 414 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7714). Any person who unloads, lands, or otherwise brings or moves into or through the United States any regulated plants, plant products, plant pests, biological control organisms, noxious weeds, soil, or other products or articles in violation of this part will be subject to prosecution under the applicable provisions of law.
( b ) Whenever the Deputy Administrator of the Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs shall find that existing conditions of danger of plant pest escape or dissemination involved in the arrival, unloading, landing, or other movement, or possession in the United States of plants, plant products, plant pests, biological control organisms, noxious weeds, soil, or other products or articles subject to the regulations in this part, make it safe to modify by making less stringent the restrictions contained in any such regulation, he shall publish such findings in administrative instructions, specifying the manner in which the regulations shall be made less stringent with respect thereto, whereupon such modification shall become effective; or he may, upon request in specific cases, when the public interests will permit, authorize arrival, unloading, landing, or other movement, or possession in the United States under conditions that are less stringent than those contained in the regulations in this part.
( c ) The Deputy Administrator also may set forth and publish, in administrative instructions, requirements and conditions for any class of products or articles supplemental to the regulations in this part, and may promulgate interpretations of this part.
( d ) The Deputy Administrator shall employ procedures to carry out the purposes of this part which will impose a minimum of impediment to foreign commerce, consistent with proper precaution against plant pest, noxious weed, or biological control organism dissemination.
[25 FR 1929, Mar. 5, 1960, as amended at 66 FR 21059, Apr. 27, 2001; 75 FR 68952, Nov. 10, 2010; 84 FR 29966, June 25, 2019]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jimmy Scott, Appellant.

Motion granted and order of this court [33 A D 2d 657] entered October 23, 1969 amended to state that certain constitutional questions were presented and passed upon. Present—Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Gabrielli and Bastow, JJ.
§ 460.10 Eligibility. ( a ) For the 2022 crop year, to be eligible for premium support under PCCP, the participant must be a person who is eligible to receive Federal benefits and who has purchased a crop insurance policy for a first insured crop from an AIP for insured acres on which the participant planted a qualifying cover crop after June 15, 2021, during the 2021 crop year, or during the 2022 crop year. ( 1 ) Cover crops must be specifically reported to FSA via the Form-578 with the corresponding crop code.
( 2 ) Potential participants that are uncertain of whether their cover crop was reported to the FSA are encouraged to contact their local FSA county office (*http://farmers.gov/service-locator*).
( 3 ) Only acreage reports that are filed or amended prior to March 15, 2022, (or May 31, 2022, for 2022 crop year qualifying cover crops planted after March 15, 2022), will be considered for PCCP.
( b ) Participants who are in violation of Highly Erodible Land or Wetlands Conservation (16 U.S.C. 3811, 3812, and 3821) are not eligible to receive benefits under PCCP.
( c ) A person is not eligible to receive benefits under PCCP if at any time that person is determined to be ineligible for crop insurance.
( d ) Supplemental Coverage Option, Enhanced Coverage Option, Post-Application Coverage Endorsement, and Hurricane Insurance Protection—Wind Index policies or endorsements are not eligible for PCCP.
( e ) Stacked Income Protection Plan (STAX) and Margin Protection (MP) policies are only eligible for PCCP when insured as a standalone policy. STAX and MP endorsements to underlying polices are not eligible for PCCP.
[87 FR 7929, Feb. 12, 2022, as amended at 87 FR 15839, Mar. 21, 2022]
§ 56.69 Misrepresentation, deceptive, or fraudulent act or practice. Any willful misrepresentation or any deceptive or fraudulent act or practice found to be made or committed by any person in connection with: ( a ) The making or filing of an application for any grading service, appeal, or regrading service;
( b ) The making of the product accessible for sampling or grading;
( c ) The making, issuing, or using or attempting to issue or use any grading certificate, symbol, stamp, label, seal, or identification authorized pursuant to the regulations in this part;
( d ) The use of the terms “United States” or “U.S.” in conjunction with the grade of the product;
( e ) The use of any of the aforesaid terms or any official stamp, symbol, label, seal, or identification in the labeling or advertising of any product.
[71 FR 42011, July 24, 2006]
#### § 51.2957 Bright.

*Bright* means a fairly light, attractive appearance. A slight chalky deposit on the shell shall not be considered as affecting brightness.
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 29, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50820

 

LARRY D. SKINNER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SAN FELIPE DEL RIO CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT

SCHOOL DISTRICT; ET AL.,

Defendants,

SAN FELIPE DEL RIO CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT

SCHOOL DISTRICT; EDDIE BACA, in his individual

capacity; JOANNE RUARK-ACKERMANN, DR., in her

individual capacity; ANN DIXON, DR., in her individual

capacity; KAY HERNANDEZ; FRED HERNANDEZ,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Western District of Texas

(USDC No. DR-01-CV-7)

_______________________________________________________

Before KING, Chief Judge, REAVLEY and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

2

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant appeals both the award of attorney’s fees and the amount awarded to appellee.

We affirm for the following reasons.

In assessing whether fees are appropriate under Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC,

434 U.S. 412, 421 (1978), for frivolous or meritless litigation, this Court has been guided by the

Mississippi factors: (1) whether the plaintiff established a prima facie case; (2) whether the

defendant offered to settle; and (3) whether there was a full-blown trial on the merits. United

States v. Mississippi, 921 F.2d 604, 609 (5th Cir. 1991). It is important to note that “[t]hese

factors are, however, guideposts, not hard and fast rules. Determinations regarding frivolity are to

be made on a case-by-case basis.” See EEOC v. L. B. Foster Co., 123 F.3d 746, 751 (3d Cir.

1997) (internal citations and quotations omitted). While satisfying a prima facie case usually

precludes the award of attorney’s fees, there are instances in which the prima facie case may be

shown but the case is still ultimately frivolous. See EEOC v. Union Camp. Corp., 536 F. Supp.

64, 66 (W.D. Mich. 1982). Whether or not the district court correctly determined that the

appellant did not establish the elements of his prima facie case of discrimination, this litigation was

ultimately groundless and frivolous. The court did not abuse its discretion.

In his reply brief, appellant also challenges the amount of the attorney’s fees. He contests

whether the hours were reasonable as the Defendants did not provide a breakdown of the

reasonable hours expended, argues the Johnson factors did not support the lodestar amount, and

contends that specific deposition and copy costs should not have been deemed recoverable. As
3

these specific issues were not clearly raised before the trial court, they are deemed waived. See

United States ex rel. Wallace v. Flintco Inc., 143 F.3d 955, 971 (5th Cir. 1998). 

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7555

LARRY CHAVIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-04-577)

Submitted: May 17, 2006 Decided: June 8, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Chavis, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant

Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Larry Chavis seeks to appeal the district court’s order

granting the Respondent’s motion for summary judgment and denying

relief on Chavis’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as time-barred.

This order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district

court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S.

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chavis has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-091
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

    The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., and its officers and agents

Date:  September 10, 2007


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum

Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior officer in charge of securitization
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
Exhibit 32

NEWSTAR FINANCIAL, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of NewStar Financial, Inc. (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | NEWSTAR FINANCIAL, INC.                                          
|                     | 
|Date: March 10, 2008 |  | /s/    TIMOTHY J.
CONWAY                                         
|                     |  | Timothy J. Conway Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|                     | 
|Date: March 10, 2008 |  | /s/    JOHN K.
BRAY                                              
|                     |  | John K. Bray Chief Financial Officer
#### § 370.2 Published materials.

Rules and regulations of APHIS relating to its regulatory responsibilities are continuously published in the Federal Register, and codified in this chapter III, title 7, and in 9 CFR chapter I. APHIS issues publications explaining animal and plant health programs and the laws and regulations, including quarantines, under which the programs are conducted. These publications are, for the most part available free from the Office of Governmental and Public Affairs, USDA, Washington, DC 20250; or, in some cases from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402, at established rates.

[44 FR 53490, Sept. 14, 1979]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Nov-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  May-31-1998
<CASH>                        588,648
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 95,624
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              000
<PP&E>                        20,685,342
<DEPRECIATION>                (9,334,668)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                13,258,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         509,579
<BONDS>                       2,429,494
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    7,883,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  13,258,241
<SALES>                       1,389,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,402,931
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 618,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              666,734
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            180,466
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (62,824)
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (62,824)
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  (62,824)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (1.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (1.18)
        

</TABLE>
51.106 Title.       (a) 						            Titleto all property acquired by the contractor under the contracting officer’s authorization shall vest in the parties as provided in the contract, unless specifically provided for otherwise.                                          (b) 						            If contracts are with educational institutions and the Government Property clause at 52.245-1, AlternateII, is used, title to property having a unit acquisition cost of less than $5,000 shall vest in the contractor as provided in the clause. Agencies may provide higher thresholds, if appropriate.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 51.1 - Contractor Use of Government Supply Sources
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LASERGATE
SYSTEMS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          71,952
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  144,537
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (35,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     21,697
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               313,344
<PP&E>                                         560,656
<DEPRECIATION>                                 327,938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,394,297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,553,026
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              171
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       458,982
<OTHER-SE>                                     382,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,394,297
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,013,311
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,747,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,084,051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (799,713)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (799,713)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (799,173)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
```

[107th Congress Public Law 286]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ286.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 2023]]

Public Law 107-286
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  5805 White Oak Avenue in Encino, California, as the ``Francis Dayle 
   `Chick' Hearn Post Office''. <<NOTE: Nov. 6, 2002 -  [H.R. 5340]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5805 
White Oak Avenue in Encino, California, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Francis Dayle `Chick' Hearn Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Francis Dayle `Chick' Hearn 
Post Office''.

    Approved November 6, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5340 (S. 2931):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            Oct. 7, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 17, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2525 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Foramsulfuron. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Foramsulfuron. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FORAMSULFURON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.37 Foramsulfuron (Benzamide, 

2-(((((4,6-dimethoxy-2- 

pyrimidinyl)amino) carbonyl)amino)sulfonyl)–4- 

(formylamino)- N,N-dimethyl-,) (CAS No. 173159– 

57–4), in bulk or put up in 

forms or packaging for retail 

sale (provided for in subheading 2935.00.75 or 

3808.30.15) ......................... 2.6% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 2525 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
§ 59.201 General reporting provisions. ( a ) *Packer-owned swine.* Information required under this section for packer-owned swine shall include quantity and carcass characteristics, but not price.
( b ) *Type of purchase.* If information regarding the type of purchase is required under this section, the information shall be reported according to the numbers and percentages of each type of purchase comprising: ( 1 ) Packer-sold swine; and
( 2 ) All other swine.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Good Earth Land Sales Company (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Petie P. Maguire, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/Petie P. Maguire



PETIE P. MAGUIRE

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Chief Financial Officer

Good Earth Land Sales Company



March 31, 2008