alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jonathan Moore, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Language Enterprises Corp. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
      year ended July 31, 2007, and to which this certification is attached as
      Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                            



| | By:    | /s/
      Jonathan Moore                               
| | ------ | -------------------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                        
| | Name:  | JONATHAN MOORE                                         
| |        |                                                        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
      Officer,
| |        | President and Treasurer                                
| |        |                                                        
| | Date:  | October 29, 2007                                       
| |        |                                                        



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
# L_2013245EN.01000701.xml

| 14.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 245/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 245/7

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 880/2013

of 13 September 2013

amending for the 201st time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al Qaida network

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al-Qaida network, (1) and in particular Article 7(1)(a) and 7a(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 4 September 2013 the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) decided to remove one entity from its list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply after considering a de-listing request submitted by this entity and the Comprehensive Report of the Ombudsperson established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1904(2009). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 4 September 2013 the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) decided to remove one entity from its list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply after considering a de-listing request submitted by this entity and the Comprehensive Report of the Ombudsperson established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1904(2009).

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be updated accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be updated accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 September 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments

---

(1)  
  OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9.

1

---

ANNEX

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as follows:

The following entry under the heading ‘Legal persons, groups and entities’ is deleted:

‘Lajnat Al Daawa Al Islamiya (alias (a) LDI, (b) Lajnat Al Dawa, (c) Islamic Missionary Commission). Address: (a) Afghanistan, (b) Pakistan. Other information: Associated with the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. Date of designation referred to in Article 2a (4) (b): 20.2.2003.’

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John Burkholder, Jr., Appellant, v Burkholder Bros., Inc., et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondents.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 23, 1979, which modified an Administrative Law Judge’s decision by reducing the rate of reduced earnings payable to claimant as a result of his permanent total disability. By decision of the board filed on August 2, 1977, it was determined that claimant sustained a compensable neck injury while operating a backhoe on December 16, 1974. He had previously sustained a compensable back injury on April 4, 1957. Subsequent to these injuries claimant was receiving weekly compensation payments of $89 apportioned between the two injuries when, in November, 1977, the insurance carrier on the 1974 claim filed a form C-22 seeking to suspend its payments to claimant based upon medical reports allegedly showing a change in claimant’s condition on and after November 8, 1977. An Administrative Law Judge ruled that the $89 weekly payments should continue, however, and the carrier appealed to the board. Upon its review of the matter, the board held that claimant has a permanent total disability causally related to both accidents and that he should receive weekly payments of $80 apportioned $36 against the 1957 back injury and $44 against the 1974 neck injury. Claimant now appeals. Initially, we hold that the board’s decision reducing claimant’s weekly rate to $80 relates solely to payments made subsequent to November 8, 1977. Not only did the carrier’s form C-22 allege a change in claimant’s condition on or after that date, but also the only evidence in support of the carrier’s position comes from a medical examination of claimant on that date. Such being the case, there is no evidence in the record of any change in claimant’s condition prior to November 8, 1977, and under these circumstances, any attempt by the carrier to apply the $80 rate to payments made before November 8, 1977 and thereby recoup alleged overpayments to claimant is clearly unjustified and cannot be permitted. Additionally, and most significantly, we also find no explanation in the record for the board’s reduction of claimant’s weekly compensation rate from $89 to $80. This reduction appears particularly incongruous when it is noted that the board continues to find that claimant has a permanent total disability. Moreover, since claimant’s attorney mistakenly indicated during a hearing before the board that the maximum rate which plaintiff could receive was $80, the board might well have utilized this erroneous $80 figure in determining claimant’s benefit rate. Accordingly, with these circumstances prevailing, we conclude that this matter must be remitted to the board for either a clarification as to how the $80 rate was established or a further adjustment of the rate. Decision withheld, and matter remitted to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Greenblott, J. P., Staley, Jr., Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.
# 37.402 Contracting officer responsibilities.

*Contracting officers**shall* obtain evidence of insurability concerning medical liability *insurance* from the apparent successful *offeror* prior to contract award and *shall* obtain evidence of *insurance* demonstrating the required coverage prior to commencement of performance.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 37.4 - Nonpersonal Health Care Services
52.214-5 Submission of Bids.

As prescribed in 14.201-6(c)(1), insert the following provision:

Submission of Bids (Dec 2016)

(a) Bids and bid modifications shall be submitted in sealed envelopes or packages (unless submitted

by electronic means)-

(1) Addressed to the office specified in the solicitation; and

(2) Showing the time and date specified for receipt, the solicitation number, and the name and

address of the bidder.

(b) Bidders using commercial carrier services shall ensure that the bid is addressed and marked on

the outermost envelope or wrapper as prescribed in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this provision when

delivered to the office specified in the solicitation.

(c) Facsimile bids, modifications, or withdrawals, will not be considered unless authorized by the

solicitation.

(d) Bids submitted by electronic commerce shall be considered only if the electronic commerce

method was specifically stipulated or permitted by the solicitation.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.214 [Reserved]
37.111 Extension of services.

Award of contracts for recurring and continuing service requirements are often delayed due to

circumstances beyond the control of contracting offices. Examples of circumstances causing such

delays are bid protests and alleged mistakes in bid. In order to avoid negotiation of short extensions

to existing contracts, the contracting officer may include an option clause (see 17.208(f)) in

solicitations and contracts which will enable the Government to require continued performance of

any services within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract. However, these rates may be

adjusted only as a result of revisions to prevailing labor rates provided by the Secretary of Labor.

The option provision may be exercised more than once, but the total extension of performance

thereunder shall not exceed 6 months.

Parent topic: Subpart 37.1 - Service Contracts-General
35.017-7 Limitation on the creation of new

FFRDC’s.

Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 4126, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Army, the Secretary of

the Navy, the Secretary of the Air Force, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Administrator

of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration may not obligate or expend amounts

appropriated to the Department of Defense for purposes of operating an FFRDC that was not in

existence before June 2, 1986, until—

(a) The head of the agency submits to Congress a report with respect to such center that describes

the purpose, mission, and general scope of effort of the center; and

(b) A period of 60 days, beginning on the date such report is received by Congress, has elapsed.

Parent topic: 35.017 Federally Funded Research and Development Centers.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:94cr03135-07/LAC

JOSEPH SYKOSKY

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on June 9, 2009 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF SENTENCING

GUIDELINES TO CRACK COCAINE OFFENSE 18 USC 3582 

Filed by DEFENDANT on 5/20/2009 Doc.# 664

RESPONSES:

 None on Doc.# 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 6 day of

th

July, 2009, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Application Note 1 to §1B1.10 of the guidelines states a reduction in the

defendant’s term of imprisonment is not authorized under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2)

if the amendment is applicable to the defendant but does not have the effect of

lowering the defendant’s applicable guideline range because of the operation of

another guideline or statutory provision. Since the defendant’s sentence was

based upon application of §2A1.1 (First Degree Murder), and not the drug offense

(§2D1.1), he is not eligible for relief pursuant to Amendments 706, 711, and 715

of the Sentencing Guidelines.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

 

Case 3:94-cr-03135-LC Document 665 Filed 07/06/09 Page 1 of 1
```

Wells
Fargo

                                                   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
                                                   Document Custody
                                                   1015 10th Avenue SE
                                                   Minneapolis, MN 55414

                                                   Appendix I

           ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for
the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after
January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides document custody services,
excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by
the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). The Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform, the Company provides the following assessment of
compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for
the Period.

                                WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
                                By: /s/ Shari L. Gillund
                                -------------------------------------
                                Shari L. Gillund

                                Its: Senior Vice President

                                Dated: March 1, 2007
```
52.211-2 Availability of Defense

Specifications, Standards, and Data Item

Descriptions in the Acquisition Streamlining

and Standardization Information System

(ASSIST) website.

As prescribed in 11.204(b), insert the following provision:

Availability of Defense Specifications, Standards, and Data Item Descriptions in the Acquisition

Streamlining and Standardization Information System (ASSIST) website (Sep 2023)

(a) Most unclassified Defense specifications and standards may be downloaded from the ASSIST

website at https://assist.dla.mil.

(b) Defense documents not available from ASSIST may be requested from the Defense

Standardization Program Office by—

(1) Using the ASSIST feedback module ( https://assist.dla.mil/feedback ); or

(2) Contacting the Defense Standardization Program Office by telephone at 571–767–6888 or email

at assisthelp@dla.mil.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.211 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:96-cr-00021-MP

LORENZO ATKINS,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 60, Motion to Continue Revocation Hearing filed

by Lorenzo Atkins. A telephone hearing was held on the matter on Friday, November 4, 2005. 

The Government indicated that it did not object to continuing the hearing. Accordingly,

Defendant's motion is hereby GRANTED. Defendant's revocation hearing is hereby rescheduled

to Friday, December 9, 2005, at 10:00 a.m.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2005

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:96-cr-00021-MP Document 64 Filed 11/08/05 Page 1 of 1
#### § 51.32 Who may be licensed.

Persons who are employed by a cooperative Federal-State Inspection Agency and possess adequate qualifications, as determined by such examinations as the Administrator may consider to be appropriate, may be licensed as inspectors of products which may be inspected under the regulations in this part. Such license shall bear the printed signature of the Secretary and shall be countersigned by an authorized employee of the Department. A licensed inspector shall perform his duties pursuant to the regulations in this subpart as directed by the Administrator.
42.902 Procedures.

(a) When notified of bankruptcy proceedings, agencies shall, as a minimum-

(1) Furnish the notice of bankruptcy to legal counsel and other appropriate agency offices (e.g.,

contracting, financial, property) and affected buying activities;

(2) Determine the amount of the Government’s potential claim against the contractor (in assessing

this impact, identify and review any contracts that have not been closed out, including those

physically completed or terminated);

(3) Take actions necessary to protect the Government’s financial interests and safeguard

Government property; and

(4) Furnish pertinent contract information to the legal counsel representing the Government.

(b) The contracting officer shall consult with legal counsel, whenever possible, prior to taking any

action regarding the contractor’s bankruptcy proceedings.

Parent topic: Subpart 42.9 - Bankruptcy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                              99
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  584,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                    29,626
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           4,595
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 574,617
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        303,350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   574,617
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,274
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,876
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,767
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,631
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,531
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,531
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 232 (Friday, December 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 30, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. Old Line Bancshares, Inc., Bowie, Maryland; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Maryland Bankcorp, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Maryland Bank & Trust Company, 
National Association, both of Lexington Park, Maryland.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 30, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-30362 Filed 12-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P