alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-04-00669- CR

M ic hae l Lin daa s a ka M ic hae l La ndaa s a ka M ic hae l G r e e r , A ppe lla nt
v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF WILLI AMSO N COUNTY , 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 03-8 11- K2 77, H ONO RAB LE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N A j ur y fo un d a pp e lla nt M ic ha e l L ind a a s guil ty of po sse ssi ng mor e tha n f our gra ms of methamphetamine w ith intent to deliver. See Tex. Hea lth & Saf ety Code Ann. § 481.112(a ), (d) (West 2003). The jury

assessed punishment, e nhance d by two previous fe lony

convictions, at life imp ri so nme nt. Ap pe lla

nt’ s c ourt -a

pp ointe d atto rn e y

fi le d a br ie f c on c lud ing

that th e a

pp e a l is frivolous and without mer it. The brief me ets the re quirements of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by p re s en t i n ga prof essional eva luation of the re cord de monstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be adva nced. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 4 88 U. S. 7 5 ( 19 88 ); Hi gh v . S tate , 573 S.W. 2d 80 7 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 516 S.W .2d 68 4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); J ac k so n v . S tate , 4 85 S.W. 2d

55 3 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); Ga ino us v . S tate , 4 3 6 S. W. 2 d

1 3 7 ( T e x.2

Cr im. Ap p. 19 69 ). App e lla nt r e c e ive d a

c op y of c ouns e l’ s b ri e f a

nd wa s a dv ise d o f h is r ig ht t o examine the appellate rec ord and to file a pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed. We have r eviewe d the re c o r d and counse l’s brief a

nd ag ree that the appe al is frivolous
and wi tho ut m e ri t. We fi nd

no thi ngin t

he re c or d th at mi g ht a

rgua bly su pp or t th e a pp e a l. The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Patter son and Pury ear Affir med Filed: Jul y

13, 2005 Do No t Pu

bli sh
# 51.205 Contract clause.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.251-2, Interagency Fleet Management System (IFMS) Vehicles and Related Services, in *solicitations* and contracts when a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated and the *contracting officer**may* authorize the contractor to use interagency fleet management system (IFMS) vehicles and related services.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 51.2 - Contractor Use of Interagency Fleet Management System (IFMS) Vehicles
§ 58.644 Test methods. ( a ) *Microbiological.* Microbiological determinations shall be made in accordance with the methods described in the latest edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products.
( b ) *Chemical.* Chemical analysis shall be made in accordance with the methods described in the latest edition of Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, the latest edition of Standard Methods, or by other methods giving equivalent results.
#### § 58.132 Basis for classification.

The quality classification of raw milk for manufacturing purposes from each producer shall be based on an organoleptic examination for appearance and odor, a drug residue test, and quality control tests for sediment content, bacterial estimate and somatic cell count. All milk received from producers shall not exceed the Food and Drug Administration's established limits for pesticide, herbicide and drug residues. Producers shall be promptly notified of any shipment or portion thereof of their milk that fails to meet any of these quality specifications.

[58 FR 26912, May 6, 1993]
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 5:94CR5026 LAC

RICHARD A. THOMAS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on January 28, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION UNDER 18 U.S.C. SECTION 3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on1/28/08 Doc.# 320

RESPONSES:

BY GOVERNMENT on1/29/08 Doc.# 321 and 322

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 29th day of

January, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Without prejudice. The retroactive application does not become effective

until 3 March 2008. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 5:94-cr-05026-LC-MD Document 324 Filed 01/29/08 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Animal Health International, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statement (No. 333-142521) on Form S-8 of Animal Health International, Inc. of our report dated September 18, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Animal Health International, Inc. andsubsidiaries as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended and cash flows on June 30, 2005 (Successor periods) and the consolidatedstatements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Walco Holdings, Inc. (Predecessor) for the year ended June 30, 2005 (Predecessor period) (collectively the Company), which report appears in the June 30, 2007, annualreport on Form 10-K of Animal Health International, Inc. 

Our report dated September 18, 2007, contains explanatory paragraphs that state AnimalHealth International, Inc. acquired all of the outstanding stock of Walco Holdings, Inc. in a business combination accounted for as a purchase and accordingly the consolidated financial information for the period after the acquisition is presentedon a different cost basis than that for the periods before the acquisition and, therefore, is not comparable, and refers to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 (revised2004), “Share-Based Payment” in fiscal year 2007. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

September 18, 2007
27.304 Procedures.

27.304-1 General.

27.304-2 Contracts placed by or for other Government agencies.

27.304-3 Subcontracts.

27.304-4 Appeals.

Parent topic: Subpart 27.3 - Patent Rights under Government Contracts
#### § 58.138 Quality testing of milk from new producers.

A quality examination and tests shall be made on the first shipment of milk from a producer shipping milk to a plant for the first time or resuming shipment to a plant after a period of non-shipment. The milk shall meet the requirements for acceptable milk, somatic cell count and drug residue level (§§ 58.133, 58.134 and 58.135). The buyer shall also confirm that the producer's milk is currently not excluded from the market (§ 58.137). Thereafter, the milk shall be tested in accordance with the provisions in §§ 58.133, 58.134 and 58.135.

[58 FR 26913, May 6, 1993]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 5:99cr15-SPM

FELIPE GUERRA JAIMES,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Defendant

Felipe Guerra Jaimes’ motion entitled “File Notice of Appeal and Bail Bond

Motion and Stay the Court Judgement Pursuant to Fed R. App. Rule 10(b)(3)(A).

and Fed. R. App. R. Rule 26(b). Doc. 1709. Defendant is not entitled to release

on bail or a stay of his criminal judgment. Defendant has not demonstrated that

he is entitled to free copies of transcripts and court records. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion (doc. 1709) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of September, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
|  | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Paramount Gold Corp. for the year ended August 31, 2017 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of American Paramount Gold Corp. |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Ron Loudoun                                                                                  |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Ron Loudoun                                                                                      |
|   | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,Secretary and Treasurer and Director |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officerand Principal Accounting Officer)       |
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2650 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2650

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Federal courthouse to be constructed in Greenville, 
South Carolina, as the ``Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. Federal Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARROLL A. CAMPBELL, JR. FEDERAL COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal courthouse to be constructed in 
Greenville, South Carolina, building number SC0017ZZ, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. Federal Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal courthouse 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. Federal Courthouse.

            Passed the Senate June 27, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2650

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the Federal courthouse to be constructed in Greenville, 
South Carolina, as the ``Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. Federal Courthouse''.
```
#### § 54.1022 When request for appeal service may be withdrawn.

A request for appeal service may be withdrawn by the applicant at any time before the appeal service has been performed, upon payment of any expenses already incurred under the regulations by the Branch in connection therewith.
#### § 51.2848 Scallions.

*Scallions* are onions which have thick necks and relatively small and poorly developed bulbs.
28.305 Overseas workers’ compensation and

war-hazard insurance.

(a) "Public-work contract," as used in this subpart, means any contract for a fixed improvement or

for any other project, fixed or not, for the public use of the United States or its allies, involving

construction, alteration, removal, or repair, including projects or operations under service contracts

and projects in connection with the national defense or with war activities, dredging, harbor

improvements, dams, roadways, and housing, as well as preparatory and ancillary work in

connection therewith at the site or on the project.

(b) The Defense Base Act (42 U.S.C.1651, etseq.) extends the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’

Compensation Act (33 U.S.C.901) to various classes of employees working outside the United States,

including those engaged in performing-

(1) Public-work contracts; or

(2) Contracts approved or financed under the Foreign Assistance Act of1961 (Pub.L.87-195) other

than-

(i) Contracts approved or financed by the Development Loan Fund (unless the Secretary of Labor,

acting upon the recommendation of a department or agency, determines that such contracts should

be covered); or

(ii) Contracts exclusively for materials or supplies.

(c) When the Defense Base Act applies (see 42 U.S.C.1651, etseq.) to these employees, the benefits

of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act are extended through operation of

the War Hazards Compensation Act (42 U.S.C.1701, etseq.) to protect the employees against the risk

of war hazards (injury, death, capture, or detention). When, by means of an insurance policy or a

self-insurance program, the contractor provides the workers’ compensation coverage required by

the Defense Base Act, the contractor’s employees automatically receive war-hazard risk protection.

(d) When the agency head recommends a waiver to the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary may waive

the applicability of the Defense Base Act to any contract, subcontract, work location, or classification

of employees.

(e) If the Defense Base Act is waived for some or all of the contractor’s employees, the benefits of

the War Hazards Compensation Act are automatically waived with respect to those employees for

whom the Defense Base Act is waived. For those employees, the contractor shall provide workers’

compensation coverage against the risk of work injury or death and assume liability toward the

employees and their beneficiaries for war-hazard injury, death, capture, or detention. The contract

shall provide either that the costs of this liability or the reasonable costs of insurance against this

liability shall be allowed as a cost under the contract.

Parent topic: Subpart 28.3 - Insurance
157 So.2d 470

#### Frances M. MATTHEWSON, Mary V. Mitzel and Hiram A. Matthewson v. Judge Leo W. McCUNE, Frank Evans, Burl Thibodeaux, Margaret D. Pellegrin, Laura Strahorn and William R. Vanderwall.

No. 47009.

Nov. 20, 1963.

■ In re: Frances M. Matthewson, Mary V. Mitzel and Hiram A. Matthewson applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application not considered. This Court is without jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus in a case such as this, of which it has no appellate jurisdiction. See Sections 2, 10 and 29 of Art. VII of the Constitution, LSA.
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Michael Minhong Yu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 13, 2007



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Michael Minhong Yu 
|Name:  |  | Michael Minhong Yu     
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### Daniel F. Cardone, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Daniel M. Cardone, et al., Appellants, v University Hospital et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Daniel F. Cardone, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Daniel M. Cardone, et al., Plaintiffs, v New York University Medical Center (University Hospital) et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

In a medical malpractice action, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 10, 1980, as denied the branches of their motion which sought leave to (1) serve a supplemental bill of particulars in Action No. 1 (while granting the same relief as to Action No. 2), and (2) conform the *ad damnum*clause in Action No. 1 to the *ad damnum*clause in Action No. 2. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable jointly by respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, the provisions denying the branches of plaintiffs’ motion which sought leave to serve a supplemental bill of particulars in Action No. 1 and to conform the *ad damnum*clause in Action No. 1 to the *ad damnum*clause in Action No. 2, are deleted therefrom, and the said branches of the motion are granted, except that the words "and/or postoperative” are deleted from the proposed supplemental bill of particulars. The supplemental bill of particulars in the form annexed to the moving papers, as so modified, is deemed served in Action No. 1. On the record before us, it appears that the issues raised on this appeal are not the same as those decided in *Cardone*v *University Hosp.*(72 AD2d 544). The proposed supplemental bill of particulars does not set forth a new legal theory of liability or new injuries, but merely expands upon the continuing disabilities alleged in the original bill. As such, plaintiffs should have been permitted to serve their supplemental bill in Action No. 1 (see CPLR 3043, subd [b]; *Shillingford v Eckert,*73 AD2d 601; *Lotto v Beth Shalom Center of Amityville & Massapequas,*68 AD2d 881). However, the phrase "and/or post-operative” in Item No. 2 of the proposed supplemental bill in Action No. 1 should be deleted (see *Cardone v University Hosp., supra).*The delay in making the instant motion to increase the *ad damnum*clause is not per se an acceptable ground for denial, in view of the fact that defendants have failed to demonstrate in what manner they would be actually prejudiced thereby (see *Hampton v Lefkowitz,*72 AD2d 805; *Hillenbrand v 3801 Review Place,*72 AD2d 554). Moreover, the application to increase the *ad damnum*clause is essentially based upon an update and re-evaluation of the original injuries (see *Hampton v Lefkowitz, supra; Hillenbrand v 3801 Review Place, supra).*We further note that the facts of this case strongly suggest the advisability of a joint or consolidated trial of-these actions. Gibbons, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 232 (Friday, December 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75474-75475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic 
Substances and Disease Registry (NCEH/ATSDR); Notice of National 
Conversation on Public Health and Chemical Exposures Leadership Council 
Meeting

    Time and Date: 9 a.m.-5 p.m. EST, Wednesday, December 15, 2010.
    Location: Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle, NW., 
Washington, DC 20005.
    Status: Open to the public, on a first come, first served basis, 
limited by the space available. An opportunity for the public to listen 
to the meeting by phone will be available. For information on observing 
the meeting in person or by phone, see ``contact for additional 
information'' below.
    Purpose: This is the seventh meeting of the National Conversation 
on Public Health and Chemical Exposures Leadership Council, which is 
convened by RESOLVE, a non-profit independent facilitator. The National 
Conversation on Public Health and Chemical Exposures is a collaborative 
initiative supported by NCEH/ATSDR and through which many organizations 
and individuals are helping develop an action agenda for strengthening 
the Nation's approach to protecting the public's health from harmful 
chemical exposures. The Leadership Council provides overall guidance to 
the National Conversation project and is responsible for issuing the 
final action agenda. For additional information on the National 
Conversation on Public Health and Chemical Exposures, visit this Web 
site: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/nationalconversation/.
    Meeting agenda: The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the draft 
action agenda.
    Contact for additional information: If you would like to receive 
additional information on attending this meeting in person or listening 
by telephone, please

[[Page 75475]]

contact: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f49a95809d9b9a9598979b9a8291868795809d9b9ab4979097da939b82"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="711f1005181e1f101d121e1f071403021005181e1f311215125f161e07">[email protected]</span></a> or Julie Fishman at 770-488-0629.

Tanja Popovic,
Deputy Associate Director for Science, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-30165 Filed 12-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2626 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2626

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 50 percent amine 
   neutralized phosphated polyester polymer, 50 percent solvesso 100.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 2006

  Mr. Voinovich (for himself and Mr. DeWine) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 50 percent amine 
   neutralized phosphated polyester polymer, 50 percent solvesso 100.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 50 PERCENT AMINE NEUTRALIZED PHOSPHATED POLYESTER POLYMER, 
              50 PERCENT SOLVESSO 100.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.25 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 50 percent amine neutralized 
phosphated polyester polymer, 50 percent solvesso 100) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 51.1348 Culls.

“Culls” are pears which do not meet the requirements of either of the foregoing grades.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v Willie Gene Thomas, Defendant.

— Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendants have not on this application met their burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Cayuga County (CPL 230.20, subd 2). If it develops during the *voir dire*that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in the application before us now is premature. (See *People v Di Piazza,*24 NY2d 342; *People v Hatch,*46 AD2d 721; *People v Sekou,*45 AD2d 982, app dsmd 35 NY2d 844.)
#### § 51.1813 U.S. No. 1 Golden.

The requirements for this grade are the same as for U.S. No. 1 except that not more than 30 percent, by count, of the fruit shall have than more one-third of their surface, in the aggregate, affected by discoloration. For tolerances see § 51.1820.