alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
15.202 Advisory multi-step process.

(a) The agency may publish a presolicitation notice (see 5.204) that provides a general description of

the scope or purpose of the acquisition and invites potential offerors to submit information that

allows the Government to advise the offerors about their potential to be viable competitors. The

presolicitation notice should identify the information that must be submitted and the criteria that

will be used in making the initial evaluation. Information sought may be limited to a statement of

qualifications and other appropriate information (e.g., proposed technical concept, past

performance, and limited pricing information). At a minimum, the notice shall contain sufficient

information to permit a potential offeror to make an informed decision about whether to participate

in the acquisition. This process should not be used for multi-step acquisitions where it would result

in offerors being required to submit identical information in response to the notice and in response

to the initial step of the acquisition.

(b) The agency shall evaluate all responses in accordance with the criteria stated in the notice, and

shall advise each respondent in writing either that it will be invited to participate in the resultant

acquisition or, based on the information submitted, that it is unlikely to be a viable competitor. The

agency shall advise respondents considered not to be viable competitors of the general basis for that

opinion. The agency shall inform all respondents that, notwithstanding the advice provided by the

Government in response to their submissions, they may participate in the resultant acquisition.

Parent topic: Subpart 15.2 - Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Saint James Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  February 3, 2004                   By:      /s/ Chih-Chang Chang
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                  Chih-Chang Chang
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
Case 3:20-cr-00064-MCR Document 32 Filed 01/29/21 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:20-cr-00064-MCR Document 32 Filed 01/29/21 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:20-cr-00064-MCR Document 32 Filed 01/29/21 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:20-cr-00064-MCR Document 32 Filed 01/29/21 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:20-cr-00064-MCR Document 32 Filed 01/29/21 Page 5 of 5
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 5:03cr33/MCR

 5:09cv135/MCR/MD

DAVID E. MARTINELLI

O R D E R

Defendant has filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under title 28

United States Code § 2255 along with a supporting memorandum of law. Because

defendant has not submitted the required form, he will be required to file an amended

motion. Rule 5.1(J) of the Local Rules for the Northern District of Florida requires that

motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be on the prescribed form. The use of a prescribed form

was adopted for reasons of administrative convenience. This court, with its large volume

of habeas actions, saves valuable time if it is not required to decipher lengthy and often

unintelligible submissions. This saving would be lost if the defendants were allowed to

either forgo use of the form entirely, or to fill in the form with a notation instead of

completing the form itself. In light of the administrative benefits derived from the use of the

form, defendant must fully complete the form, providing a brief statement of each ground

for relief and the supporting facts in the space provided. Defendant may but is not required

to submit an accompanying and separate memorandum, which shall not exceed twentyfive pages in length. He shall also submit one identical copy of the motion and supporting

Case 5:03-cr-00033-MCR-CJK Document 360 Filed 04/15/09 Page 1 of 2
Case No: 5:03cr33/MCR; 5:09cv135/MCR/MD

memorandum, if any, for service. Defendant is advised that it is not the court’s practice

to return copies of pleadings mailed to the court unless adequate return postage and a

self-addressed stamped envelope has been provided.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Clerk shall mail to the defendant a copy of this order and a copy of the form

for use in Section 2255 cases. This case number should be written on the form.

2. Within thirty days, defendant shall file his amended motion and supporting

memorandum of law, if any. He shall also provide one identical service copy of the

amended motion and attachments, if any. The amended motion should be complete in

and of itself and must not refer to the original motion or any attachments thereto. 

3. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that the motion

be denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of April, 2009.

/s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:03-cr-00033-MCR-CJK Document 360 Filed 04/15/09 Page 2 of 2
§ 58.349 Frozen cream. The flavor shall be sweet, pleasing and desirable, but may possess the following flavors to a slight degree: Aged, bitter, flat, smothered, storage; and cooked and feed flavors to a definite degree. It shall be free from rancid, oxidized or other objectionable flavors. ( a ) In addition, the product shall meet the following specifications when sampled and tested in accordance with §§ 58.336 and 58.337. Samples for analysis should be taken prior to freezing of the product.
( b ) Standard plate count, not more than 30,000 per ml.; coliform count, not more than 10 per ml.; yeast and mold, not more than 20 per ml.
( c ) Optional except when required or requested: Copper content, not more than 0.3 ppm; iron content not more than 1.0 ppm.
47.305-1 Solicitation requirements.

When the acquisition of supplies is on f.o.b. origin or f.o.b. destination delivery terms, the

contracting officer shall include in solicitations a requirement that the offeror furnish the

Government as much of the following data as is applicable to the particular acquisition:

(a) Modes of transportation and, if rail transportation is used, names of rail carriers serving the

offeror’s facility.

(b) The number of railroad cars, motor trucks, or other conveyances that can be loaded per day.

(c) Type of packaging; e.g., box, carton, crate, drum, bundle, skids, and when applicable, package

number from the governing freight classification.

(d) Number of units packed in one container.

(e) Guaranteed maximum shipping weight; cubic measurement; and length, width, and height of

each container.

(f) Minimum size of each shipment.

(g) Number of containers or units that can be loaded in a car, truck, or other conveyance of the size

normally used (specify type and size) for the commodity.

(h) Description of material in terms of the governing freight classification or tariff (or Government

rate tender) under which lowest freight rates are applicable.

(i) Benefits available to the Government under transit arrangements made by the offeror.

(j) Other requirements as stated under specific section headings.

Parent topic: 47.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Federal AidFinancial SupportFund RaisingGrantsGrantsmanshipInformation TechnologyLibrary FundingPrivate Financial SupportPublic LibrariesState Aid

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
§ 51.1856 U.S. Combination. “U.S. Combination” consists of a combination of U.S. No. 1 and U.S. No. 2 tomatoes: *Provided,* That at least 60 percent, by count, meet the requirements of U.S. No. 1 grade. ( a ) For tolerances see § 51.1861.
Exhibit 33.2
                                 ------------





          ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA



The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o  As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



                                      1
<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007



                                      2
162 So.2d 9

#### Clay J. CALHOUN et al. v. AMERICAN MARINE CORPORATION.

No. 47114.

March 30, 1964.

In re: American Marine Corporation applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 159 So.2d 19.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
Lisa K. Peterson, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Heelys, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: March 12, 2010

By:

/s/ LISA K. PETERSON Lisa K. Peterson Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
<page>
                                                           Exhibit 32.1





                         NORDSTROM CREDIT, INC.

                        13531 EAST CALEY AVENUE

                       CENTENNIAL, COLORADO 80111

                       CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
                  REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


I, Kevin T. Knight, the President of Nordstrom Credit, Inc. (the
"Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended July 31, 2004 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission:


         -  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         -  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results
            of operations of the Company.


                                          /s/ Kevin T. Knight
                                          --------------------
                                          Kevin T. Knight
                                          President
                                          August 8, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Nordstrom Credit, Inc. and will be retained by
Nordstrom Credit, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Compliance (Legal)Decision MakingDisabilitiesEducation Work RelationshipEducational LegislationFederal LegislationHigh SchoolsIndividualized Education ProgramsIndividualized Transition PlansStudent NeedsStudent ParticipationStudent RightsTransitional Programs

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### In the Matter of Bruce S. Peachey, Respondent, v Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, respondent appeals from the order of Special Term staying the mandatory order of revocation of petitioner’s New York *721State motor vehicle operator’s license pursuant to section 510 (subd 2, par a, cl [iii]) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. Petitioner alleges that he was arrested and charged with driving while intoxicated in violation of subdivision 3 of section 1192 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law on July 7, 1979; that he subsequently pleaded guilty to the charge on July 9, 1979 in the Town of North Elba Justice Court, located in the Village of Lake Placid; that such plea was improperly taken and was defective; that his motor vehicle operator’s license was thereafter revoked by respondent on August 20, 1979; and that a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to withdraw the guilty plea, vacate the conviction and place the action on the Justice Court Trial Calendar is currently pending in the Justice Court. The petition does not challenge or seek to review any aspect of the commissioner’s action in revoking petitioner’s license, which, it appears, was entirely proper in view of the statutory requirements for mandatory revocation in the circumstances here (see Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 510, subd 2, par a, cl [iii]; § 514, subd 1). The sole purpose of the CPLR article 78 proceeding is to obtain a stay of the revocation pending the determination of the motion in Justice Court. CPLR article 78, however, contains no provisions for a proceeding where the only relief sought is a stay (see CPLR 7801, 7803). A court may grant a stay in a CPLR article 78 proceeding in a proper case but only as relief that is ancillary to the ultimate relief sought pending the determination of the merits of the matter over which it has jurisdiction (see CPLR 7805; see, also, Siegel, New York Practice, § 567, p 795). Nor may the order be sustained as a stay in a proceeding to review the conviction in Justice Court inasmuch as the conviction may not be attacked collaterally in a CPLR article 78 proceeding in Supreme Court (see *Matter of Hickey v Kelly,*9 AD2d 386, 387, affd 8 NY2d 715). (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court— CPLR art 78.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
```

[House Report 107-755]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-755

======================================================================

 
   PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 123, MAKING 
       FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2003

                                _______
                                

  October 15, 2002.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 585]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 585, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of House Joint 
Resolution 123, making further continuing appropriations for 
the fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes, under a closed 
rule. The rule provides one hour of debate in the House equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Appropriations.
    The rule waives all points of order against consideration 
of the joint resolution. The rule provides one motion to 
recommit.
    Finally, the rule provides that House Resolutions 550, 551, 
and 577 are laid on the table.

                            COMMITTEE VOTES

    Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of 
each record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together 
with the names of those voting for and against, are printed 
below:

Rules Committee record vote No. 176

    Date: October 15, 2002.
    Measure: House Joint Resolution 123.
    Motion by: Mr. Frost.
    Summary of motion: To make in order the amendment offered 
by Representatives Carson of Indiana and Hill to ensure that 
states are able to retain their 1998 and 1999 funding for the 
Child Health Insurance Program.
    Results: Defeated 3 to 6.
    Vote by Members: Goss--Nay; Linder--Nay; Pryce--Nay; 
Hastings (WA)--Nay; Myrick--Nay; Frost--Yea; McGovern--Yea; 
Hastings (FL)--Yea; Dreier--Nay.

                                

```
32.202-2 Types of payments for commercial

product and commercial service purchases.

These definitions incorporate the requirements of the statutory commercial financing authority and

the implementation of the Prompt Payment Act.

Commercial advance payment, as used in this section, means a payment made before any

performance of work under the contract. The aggregate of these payments shall not exceed 15

percent of the contract price. These payments are contract financing payments for prompt payment

purposes (i.e., not subject to the interest penalty provisions of the Prompt Payment Act in

accordance with subpart 32.9). These payments are not subject to subpart 32.4, Advance Payments

for Other Than Commercial Acquisitions.

Commercial interim payment (see 32.001).

Delivery payment (see 32.001).

Parent topic: 32.202 General.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reynold Church, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, imposed March 18, 1980. Resentence affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 456.50 (subd 5). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.
#### § 58.714 Cream cheese, Neufchatel cheese.

These cheeses when mixed with other foods, or used for spreads and dips should possess a fresh, pleasing and desirable flavor.
43.103 Types of contract modifications.

Contract modifications are of the following types:

(a) Bilateral. A bilateral modification (supplemental agreement) is a contract modification that is

signed by the contractor and the contracting officer. Bilateral modifications are used to-

(1) Make negotiated equitable adjustments resulting from the issuance of a change order;

(2) Definitize letter contracts; and

(3) Reflect other agreements of the parties modifying the terms of contracts.

(b) Unilateral. A unilateral modification is a contract modification that is signed only by the

contracting officer. Unilateral modifications are used, for example, to-

(1) Make administrative changes;

(2) Issue change orders;

(3) Make changes authorized by clauses other than a changes clause (e.g., Property clause, Options

clause, or Suspension of Work clause); and

(4) Issue termination notices.

Parent topic: Subpart 43.1 - General