alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ann J. Noble, an Infant, by Daniel V. Noble, Individually and as Parent, et al., Respondents, v. Peter G. Kowalenko et al., Appellants (And 3 Other Actions.)

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from an order, Supreme Court, Ulster County, granting plain tiff s-respondents’ motion for a severance upon ground that it would be prejudicial to the rights of the infant plaintiff to be compelled to proceed to trial (CPLR 603). In support of the motion plaintiffs-respondents introduced an affidavit from an orthopedic specialist, in which he stated that while most of the infant plaintiff’s injuries had responded to treatment, aseptic necrosis had developed, that there was a possibility that further surgery might be necessary, and that six months to a year would be required before the nature and extent of the permanent disability could be determined. In light of this uncontested affidavit and additionally in view of the fact that the order granting consolidation specifically granted leave to the infant plain tiff-respondent herein to apply for severance when the actions were reached for trial if the right of the infant would be prejudiced, we find no basis to disturb the discretion of Special Term in granting the instant motion. Order affirmed, with costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MICHAEL JOE MCCOY,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 5:20cv283/TKW/EMT

MARK S. INCH,

Respondent.

_____________________/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 16) and Petitioner’s objection (Doc. 23). The Court 

reviewed the issues raised in the objection de novo as required by 28 U.S.C. 

§636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), and based on that review, the Court agrees 

with the magistrate judge’s determination that Petitioner is not entitled to federal 

habeas relief. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close 

the case file.

Case 5:20-cv-00283-TKW-EMT Document 24 Filed 10/01/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 5:20cv283/TKW/EMT

DONE and ORDERED this 1st day of October, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00283-TKW-EMT Document 24 Filed 10/01/21 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75698-75699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30340]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Sunshine Act Notice

Public Announcement; Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act 
(Pub. L. 94-409) [5 U.S.C. Section 552b]

DATE AND TIME: 12 a.m., Tuesday, December 7, 2010.

PLACE: U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor 
Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

STATUS: Closed.

[[Page 75699]]


MATTERS CONSIDERED: The following matter will be considered during the 
closed meeting: Consideration of two original jurisdiction cases 
pursuant to 28 CFR 2.27.

AGENCY CONTACT: Patricia W. Moore, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, 
United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5933.

    Dated: November 29, 2010.
Rockne Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-30340 Filed 12-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
#### §§ 4280.138-4280.148 [Reserved]
#### Hertz Corporation, Respondent, v Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on November 30, 1978, unanimously affirmed, for reasons stated by Egeth, J., at Special Term. Respondent shall recover of appellant $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Sandler, Markewich and Carro, JJ.
Subpart 41.6 - Forms

Parent topic: Part 41 - Acquisition of Utility Services

41.601 Utility services forms.

(a) If acquiring utility services under other than an areawide contract, a purchase order or an

interagency agreement, the Standard Form (SF) 33, Solicitation, Offer and Award; SF 26,

Award/Contract; or SF 1447, Solicitation/Contract, shall be used.

(b) The contracting officer shall incorporate the applicable rate schedule in each contract, purchase

order or modification.
46.504 Certificate of conformance.

A certificate of conformance (see 46.315) may be used in certain instances instead of source

inspection (whether the contract calls for acceptance at source or destination) at the discretion of

the contracting officer if the following conditions apply:

(a) Acceptance on the basis of a contractor’s certificate of conformance is in the Government’s

interest.

(b)

(1) Small losses would be incurred in the event of a defect; or

(2) Because of the contractor’s reputation or past performance, it is likely that the supplies or

services furnished will be acceptable and any defective work would be replaced, corrected, or

repaired without contest. In no case shall the Government’s right to inspect supplies under the

inspection provisions of the contract be prejudiced.

Parent topic: Subpart 46.5 - Acceptance
Editorial Note on Part 47
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 64 FR 38108, July 15, 1999.

§ 47.49 Determinations. ( a ) The PACA Branch shall determine whether a person was at the time in issue responsibly connected with a licensee whose license is subject to suspension, revocation, or termination or which is subject to having the facts and circumstances of violations of the act published. Such determination shall be made on the basis of license records on file with the PACA Branch, and such other information as may be available.
( b ) Upon determining that a person was responsibly connected at the time in issue with a licensee which is subject to the suspension or revocation of its license, or which is subject to having the facts and circumstances of violations of the Act published, and that the employment status and licensing of such person may be restricted, the PACA Branch shall notify the person in writing of his or her status and of any employment and licensing restrictions resulting therefrom.
( c ) If a person believes he or she was not responsibly connected with a licensee at the time in issue, he or she may submit the reasons for such belief in written form, along with all pertinent documents, within 30 days of the receipt of such notification to the Chief, who will promptly review the matter and advise the person in writing of the Chief's determination and the reasons for reaching such determination.
( d ) Within 30 days of receipt of notification of the Chief's determination, a person who disagrees with such determination may file with the Hearing Clerk, pursuant to § 1.130-1.151 of this title, a petition for review of the determination.
[43 FR 30788, July 18, 1978, as amended at 60 FR 8462, Feb. 14, 1995; 61 FR 11504, Mar. 21, 1996]
#  Federal Acquisition Regulation

- Part 52 - Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses 
- Part 53 - Forms 

**Parent topic:**Subchapter H - Clauses and Forms
#### § 58.23 How to obtain appeal inspection or grading.

Appeal inspection or grading may be obtained by filing a request therefore, (a) with the Administrator, (b) with the inspector or grader who issued the inspection or grading certificate or report with respect to which the appeal service is requested, or (c) with the supervisor of such inspector or grader. The application for appeal inspection or grading shall state the reasons therefore, and may be accompanied by a copy of the aforesaid inspection or grading certificate or report or any other information the applicant may have secured regarding the product or the service from which the appeal is requested. Such application may be made orally (in person or by telephone), in writing, or by telegraph. If made orally, written confirmation may be required.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SoPac Cellular Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ezra E.
Ezra, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
28th day of November, 2011.


/s/ Ezra E. Ezra, Chief Financial Officer
------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael W. Hessong, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Heelys, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:



Date:
March 31, 2009

|    |  |                                                    |  | 
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By: |  | MICHAEL W. HESSONG Interim Chief Executive Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
# C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

o f t h e S t a t e o f G eo rg i a

AT L ANT A,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

T h e Co u rt o

f A p p e a l s h e re b y p a sse s t h e fo l lo w i n g o rd e r:

A1 6 A0 6 5 3

. CEDRIC K IM BRO UG H v

. TH E S TATE.

Ce d ri c K i m b ro u g h w a s c o n v i c t e d f

o r se l l i n g c o c a i n e a n d c o c a i n e t ra f f i c k i n g

,

a n d h i s c o n v i c ti o n wa s a f

f i rm e d o n a

p p e a l

. S e e Ki mb ro u g h v

. S t a t e
, 2 1 5 G a

. Ap p

. 3 0 3

(4 5 0 S E 2 d 4 5 7 ) (1 9 9 4 ). K im b ro u g h su b se q u e n t l y f

i l e d a m o t i o n t o “ v a c a t e / c o rre c t

v o i d se n t e n c e

, ” wh i c h t h e tri a l c o u rt d e n ie d

. K i m b ro u g h a p p e a le d t h e ru li n g

, a n d we

v a c a t e d t h e ru l i n g a

n d re m a n d e d t o t h e tri a l c o u rt t o d i sm i ss ra t h e r t h a n d e n y t h e

m o t i o n

. S e e Ki mb r o u g h v

. S t a t e
, 3 2 5 G a

. A p p

. 5 1 9 (7 5 4 S E 2 d 1 0 9 ) (2 0 1 4 ).

F o l l o wi n g re m

i t t i t u r, t h e t ri a l c o u rt e n t e re d a n o rd e r d i sm

i ssi n g t h e m o t i o n

, a n d

K i m b ro u g h f i l e d t h i s a p p e a l

. 1

K i m b ro u g h h a s a l re a d y h a d o n e a p p e a l i n t h is Co u rt i n wh ic h h e c h a l l e n g e d t h e

l e g a l i t y o f h i s se n t e n c e

. H e i s n o t e n t i t l e d t o a n o t h e r. “ I t i s a x i o m a t ic t h a t th e sa m e

i ssu e c a n n o t b e re l i ti g a t e d a d i n f i n i t u m

. T h e sa m e i s t ru e o f a p p e a l s o f t h e sa m e i ssu e

o n t h e s a m e g r o u n d s

. ” E c h o l s v

. S t a t e
, 2 4 3 G a

. Ap p

. 7 7 5

, 7 7 6 (5 3 4 S E 2 d 4 6 4 )

(2 0 0 0 ); se e a lso J

o rd a n v

. S t a t e
, 2 5 3 G a

. Ap p

. 5 1 0

, 5 1 1 (2 ) (5 5 9 S E 2 d 5 2 8 ) (2 0 0 2 ).

Ou r ru l i n g i n t h e p ri o r a

p p e a l i s re s j u d ic a t a

. S e e Ho o k v

. Be rg e n
, 2 8 6 G a

. A p p

. 2 5 8

,

2 6 1 (1 ) (6 4 9 S E 2 d 3 1 3 ) (2 0 0 7 ). T h u s, K i m b ro u g h i s e st o p p e d f

ro m se e k in g f

u rt h e r

j u d i c i a l re v i e w o n t h i s i ssu e

. S e e i d

. ; se e a l so R o ss v

. S t a t e
, 3 1 0 G a

. Ap p

. 3 2 6

, 3 2 8

(7 1 3 S E 2 d 4 3 8 ) (2 0 1 1 ) (l a w o f t h e c a se ru l e b a rs s u c c e ssi v e v o i d se n te n c e a p p e a l s).

Ac c o rd i n g l y
, t h is a

p p e a l i s h e re b y DI S M I S S E D.

1 K i m b ro u g h f i l e d h i s a p p e a l i n t h e S u p re m e Co u rt

, wh i c h t ra n s f e rre d t h e m a t t e r

t o th i s Co u rt

. December 23, 2015C o u rt o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o rg i a

C l e rk ’ s O f f i c e

, A t l a n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e rt i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t ru e e x t ra c t f ro m

t h e mi n u t e s o

f t h e C o u rt o

f A p p e a l s o f Ge o rg i a

. W i t n e ss my si g n a t u re a n d t h e se a l o f sa i d c o u rt

h e re t o a f f i x e d t h e d a

y a n d y e a r l a st a b o v e w

ri t t e n

.

, C l e rk

. 12/23/2015
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2539 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2539

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Bromoxynil Meo.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2006

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Bromoxynil Meo.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BROMOXYNIL MEO.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Hrmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

``      9902.10.57      2,6-Dibromo-4-      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         cyanophenyl                                                        31/2009
                         octanoate/
                         heptanoate (CAS
                         Nos. 1689-99-2
                         and 56634-95-8)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3808.30.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
36.204 Disclosure of the magnitude of construction projects.       Advance notices and solicitations shall state the magnitude of the requirement in terms of physical characteristics and estimated price range. In no event shall the statement of magnitude disclose the Government’s estimate. Therefore, the estimated price should be described in terms of one of the following price ranges:                                       (a) 						            Less than $25,000.                                          (b) 						            Between $25,000 and $100,000.                                          (c) 						            Between $100,000 and $250,000.                                          (d) 						            Between $250,000 and $500,000.                                          (e) 						            Between $500,000 and $1,000,000.                                          (f) 						            Between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000.                                          (g) 						            Between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000.                                          (h) 						            More than $10,000,000.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 36.2 - Special Aspects of Contracting for Construction
1

The Honorable Garnett Thomas Eisele, United States District

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

 

___________

No. 95-3064

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Otis R. Banks, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: February 5, 1996 

 Filed: February 14, 1996 ___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Otis Ray Banks appeals from the district court's1 order

imposing a six-month term of imprisonment and one-year term of

supervised release upon revocation of his probation. Having

carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm

the sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 58.347 Butteroil or anhydrous milkfat.

The flavor shall be bland and free from rancid, oxidized, or other objectionable flavors.

(a) In addition, the finished products shall meet the following specifications when sampled and tested in accordance with §§ 58.336 and 58.337:

| | Butteroil | Anhydrous milkfat |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Milkfat | Not less than 99.6 percent | Not less than 99.8 percent. |
| Moisture | Not more than 0.3 percent | Not more than 0.1 percent. |
| Other butter constituents including salt | Not more than 0.1 percent | Not more than 0.1 percent. |
| Salt | Not more than 0.05 percent | Not more than 0.05 percent. |
| Antioxidants | Those permitted by standards of the Codex Alimentarius Commission and authorized for use by the Food and Drug Administration | Those permitted by standards of the Codex Alimentarius Commission and authorized for use by the Food and Drug Administration. |
| Free fatty acids | Not more than 0.5 percent (calculated as oleic acid) | Not more than 0.3 percent (calculated as oleic acid). |
| Peroxide value | Not more than 0.1 milliequivalent per kilogram of fat | Not more than 0.1 milliequivalent per kilogram of fat. |
| Iron content | Not more than 0.2 ppm | Not more than 0.2 ppm. |
| Copper content | Not more than 0.05 ppm | Not more than 0.05 ppm. |

(b) [Reserved]

[60 FR 4826, Jan. 24, 1995]
# 47.103 Transportation Payment and Audit Regulation.

- 47.103-1 General. 
- 47.103-2 Contract clause. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 47.1 - General
52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available

Information Regarding Responsibility

Matters.

As prescribed at 9.104-7(c), insert the following clause:

Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (Oct 2018)

(a) The Contractor shall update the information in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity

Information System (FAPIIS) on a semi-annual basis, throughout the life of the contract, by posting

the required information in the System for Award Management via https://www.sam.gov.

(b) As required by section 3010 of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub. L. 111-212), all

information posted in FAPIIS on or after April 15, 2011, except past performance reviews, will be

publicly available. FAPIIS consists of two segments-

(1) The non-public segment, into which Government officials and the Contractor post information,

which can only be viewed by-

(i) Government personnel and authorized users performing business on behalf of the Government; or

(ii) The Contractor, when viewing data on itself; and

(2) The publicly-available segment, to which all data in the non-public segment of FAPIIS is

automatically transferred after a waiting period of 14 calendar days, except for-

(i) Past performance reviews required by subpart 42.15;

(ii) Information that was entered prior to April 15, 2011; or

(iii) Information that is withdrawn during the 14-calendar-day waiting period by the Government

official who posted it in accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of this clause.

(c) The Contractor will receive notification when the Government posts new information to the

Contractor’s record.

(1) If the Contractor asserts in writing within 7 calendar days, to the Government official who posted

the information, that some of the information posted to the non-public segment of FAPIIS is covered

by a disclosure exemption under the Freedom of Information Act, the Government official who

posted the information must within 7 calendar days remove the posting from FAPIIS and resolve the

issue in accordance with agency Freedom of Information procedures, prior to reposting the

releasable information. The contractor must cite 52.209-9 and request removal within 7 calendar

days of the posting to FAPIIS.

(2) The Contractor will also have an opportunity to post comments regarding information that has

been posted by the Government. The comments will be retained as long as the associated

information is retained, i.e., for a total period of 6 years. Contractor comments will remain a part of

the record unless the Contractor revises them.
(3) As required by section 3010 of Pub. L. 111-212, all information posted in FAPIIS on or after April

15, 2011, except past performance reviews, will be publicly available.

(d) Public requests for system information posted prior to April 15, 2011, will be handled under

Freedom of Information Act procedures, including, where appropriate, procedures promulgated

under E.O. 12600.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.209 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 23.4 **

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLICACCOUNTANTS **

** **

We have issued our report dated March 12, 2014, with respectto the financial statements of Katonah X CLO Ltd., included in the Annual Report of KCAP Financial, Inc. on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2013. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of KCAPFinancial, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-175838, effective July 28, 2011; and File No. 333-151995, effective June 27, 2008).

 

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

 

New York, New York

March 12, 2014