alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee (#13883).                    

*Date and Time:*                         March 4, 2010, 12 p.m.-2 p.m. EST.                    

*Place:*                         Teleconference. National Science Foundation, Room 320, Stafford I Building, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Craig B. Foltz, Acting Division Director, Division of Astronomical Sciences, Suite 1045, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-292-4908.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of mutual interest and concern to the agencies.                    

*Agenda:*                         To discuss the Committee's draft annual report due 15 March 2009.                    

Susanne E. Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-3035 Filed 2-17-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Aaron W. Davis, Deceased. Sonia Davis, Appellant; Hilda Rosenthal, Respondent.

In a proceeding by the administratrix for a judicial determination of the validity of a portion of a certain claim against the intestate, the claimant appeals from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, dated November 8, 1968, as adjudged said portion of the claim invalid and unenforceable and disallowed it. Decree reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant, payable out of the estate, and (1) claim adjudged valid in full, and (2) proceeding remitted to the Surrogate’s Court with direction (a) to determine, actuarially or otherwise, how much of the decedent’s estate shall be deposited or held in trust to guarantee the payments in question to appellant and (b) to enter a decree consistent herewith, including a direction that, as to those payments which have already accrued and will accrue in the future, the administratix shall make payment to appellant at the rate of $50 per jveek from the time of the decedent’s death. The claim is by the former wife of the decedent for weekly support payments of $50 allegedly due her under a separation agreement which (1) requires the payments “to continue during her lifetime or until such time as the wife *668shall remarry” and (2) makes all provisions of the agreement “binding upon the respective heirs, next-of-kin, executors, administrators and assigns of the parties hereto.” It is the opinion of this court that both these provisions of the agreement manifest a clear intention by the decedent to make the support payments survive his death and become an obligation of his estate *(Matter of Howe,*15 Misc 2d 1044, affd. 8 A D 2d 720). Brennan, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alexander H. Good, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                                  |
|---------------------------------------|
| /s/ Alexander H. Good                 |
| Alexander H. Good                     |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

May 1, 2009
42.703-2 Certificate of indirect costs.

(a) General. In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 3747 and 41 U.S.C.4307, a proposal shall not be accepted

and no agreement shall be made to establish final indirect cost rates unless the costs have been

certified by the contractor.

(b) Waiver of certification.

(1) The agency head, or designee, may waive the certification requirement when-

(i) It is determined to be in the interest of the United States; and

(ii) The reasons for the determination are put in writing and made available to the public.

(2) A waiver may be appropriate for a contract with-

(i) A foreign government or international organization, such as a subsidiary body of the North

Atlantic Treaty Organization;

(ii) A State or local government subject to the OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200, subpart E

and appendices V and VII;

(iii) An educational institution (defined as an institution of higher education in the OMB Uniform

Guidance at 2 CFR part 200, subpart A, and 20 U.S.C. 1001) subject to the OMB Uniform Guidance

at 2 CFR part 200, subpart E and appendix III; and

(iv) A nonprofit organization (as defined in the OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200) subject to

the OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200, subpart E and appendix IV.

(c) Failure to certify.

(1) If the contractor has not certified its proposal for final indirect cost rates and a waiver is not

appropriate, the contracting officer may unilaterally establish the rates.

(2) Rates established unilaterally should be-

(i) Based on audited historical data or other available data as long as unallowable costs are

excluded; and

(ii) Set low enough to ensure that unallowable costs will not be reimbursed.

(d) False certification. The contracting officer should consult with legal counsel to determine

appropriate action when a contractor’s certificate of final indirect costs is thought to be false.

(e) Penalties for unallowable costs. 10 U.S.C. 3743 and 41 U.S.C.4303 prescribe penalties for

submission of unallowable costs in final indirect cost rate proposals (see 42.709 for penalties and

contracting officer responsibilities).

(f) Contract clause.
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (f)(2) of this subsection, the clause at 52.242-4, Certification of

Final Indirect Costs, shall be incorporated into all solicitations and contracts which provide for

establishment of final indirect cost rates.

(2) The Department of Energy may provide an alternate clause in its agency supplement for its

Management and Operating contracts.

Parent topic: 42.703 General.
§ 52.42 Schedule of fees. ( a ) For each calendar year, AMS will calculate the rate for services, per hour per program employee using the following formulas: ( 1 ) *Regular rate.* The total AMS inspection program personnel direct pay divided by direct hours, which is then multiplied by the next year's percentage of cost of living increase, plus the benefits rate, plus the operating rate, plus the allowance for bad debt rate. If applicable, travel expenses may also be added to the cost of providing the service.
( 2 ) *Overtime rate.* The total AMS inspection program personnel direct pay divided by direct hours, which is then multiplied by the next year's percentage of cost of living increase and then multiplied by 1.5 plus the benefits rate, plus the operating rate, plus an allowance for bad debt. If applicable, travel expenses may also be added to the cost of providing the service.
( 3 ) *Holiday rate.* The total AMS inspection program personnel direct pay divided by direct hours which is then multiplied by the next year's percentage of cost of living increase and then multiplied by 2, plus benefits rate, plus the operating rate, plus an allowance for bad debt. If applicable, travel expenses may also be added to the cost of providing the service.
( b ) For each calendar year, based on previous fiscal year/historical actual costs, AMS will calculate the benefits, operating, and allowance for bad debt components of the regular, overtime and holiday rates as follows: ( 1 ) *Benefits rate.* The total AMS inspection program direct benefits costs divided by the total hours (regular, overtime, and holiday) worked, which is then multiplied by the next calendar year's percentage cost of living increase. Some examples of direct benefits are health insurance, retirement, life insurance, and Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) retirement basic and matching contributions.
( 2 ) *Operating rate.* The total AMS inspection program operating costs divided by total hours (regular, overtime, and holiday) worked, which is then multiplied by the percentage of inflation.
( 3 ) *Allowance for bad debt rate.* Total AMS inspection program allowance for bad debt divided by total hours (regular, overtime, and holiday) worked.
( c ) The calendar year cost of living expenses and percentage of inflation factors used in the formulas in this section are based on the most recent Office of Management and Budget's Presidential Economic Assumptions.
[79 FR 67321, Nov. 13, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
 <CIK>                        0000755465
<NAME>                        Sandata, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     $

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                       SEP-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         NOV-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                              1.0
<CASH>                                   401,791
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                          2,413,994
<ALLOWANCES>                             484,746
<INVENTORY>                               18,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       3,828,044
<PP&E>                                20,584,308
<DEPRECIATION>                        11,513,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        13,856,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  2,416,965
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   2,506
<OTHER-SE>                             4,284,045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          13,856,527
<SALES>                                4,523,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       4,660,750
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          4,538,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        77,725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           40,051
<INCOME-TAX>                              36,221
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        7,830
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               7,830
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.01



</TABLE>
19.811-3 Contract clauses.       (a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.219-11, Special 8(a) Contract Conditions, in contracts between the SBA and the agency when the acquisition is accomplished using the procedures of 19.811-1(a) and (b).                                          (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.219-12, Special 8(a) Subcontract Conditions, in contracts between the SBA and its 8(a) contractor when the acquisition is accomplished using the procedures of 19.811-1(a) and (b).                                          (c) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.219-17, Section 8(a) Award, in competitive solicitations and contracts when the acquisition is accomplished using the procedures of 19.805 and in sole source awards which utilize the alternative procedure in 19.811-1(c).                                          (d) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.219-18, Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Participants, in competitive solicitations and contracts when the acquisition is accomplished using the procedures of 19.805. Use the clause at 52.219-18 with its Alternate I when competition is to be limited to 8(a) participants within one or more specific SBA districts pursuant to 19.804-2.                                          (e) For contracts or orders resulting from this subpart, see 19.507(e) for use of 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting, and 19.507(h) for use of 52.219-33, Nonmanufacturer Rule.    **Parent topic:** 19.811 Preparing the contracts.
IntroductionPast Floods in theLower Mississippi ValleyThe Great Flood of 1927The MR&T; ProjectSpillway Site SelectionDesign AdvancesSpillway OperationSpillway Operational EffectsNatural Resource ValuesEnvironmental ValuesCultural Resource ValuesRecreational ValuesReturn to Home Page

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  
Top of Page
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  
Top of Page
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  
**[Take our Bonnet Carre' Spillway Quiz after reading this brochure.]**
 Introduction
The Bonnet Carre' Spillway is a vital element of thecomprehensive plan for flood control in the LowerMississippi Valley. This multi-state plan, called theMississippi River and Tributaries Project (MR&T;),provides flood protection for the alluvial valley betweenCape Girardeau, Missouri, and the mouth of the river.Due to the wide expanse of the project and the complexproblems involved, the plan contains an array of features.The MR&T; Project provides for levees to contain flood flows,floodways such as the Bonnet Carre' to redirect excessflows away from the Mississippi River, plus features suchas channel improvement and river bank stabilization for efficientnavigation and protection of the levee system. It alsoinvolves reservoirs and pumping plants for flood controldrainage.
Floodways and flow distribution during major floods in theLower Mississippi River Valley
The Bonnet Carre' Spillway is the southernmost floodwayin the MR&T; system. Located in St. Charles Parish,Louisiana, the spillway protects New Orleans and otherdownstream communities during major floods on theMississippi River. This protection is accomplished bydiverting a portion of the flood waters into LakePontchartrain and thence into the Gulf of Mexico,bypassing New Orleans. This spillway was first openedduring the flood of 1937, and seven times thereafterthrough 1997 to lower river stages at New Orleans.
The spillway is part of the Mississippi River Levee System. The spillwayextends northward to Lake Ponchartrain.
The Bonnet Carre Spillway consists of two basic components:a control structure along the east bank of the MississippiRiver and a floodway that conveys the diverted flood watersto the lake. The control structure is a mechanicallycontrolled concrete weir which extends for over a mile and ahalf parallel to the river. Confined by guide levees, thefloodway stretches nearly six miles to Lake Pontchartrain.
The spillway (highlighted in green) stretches from the Mississippi River,,at right, northward to Lake Ponchartrain, on the left of the photo.
In addition to its flood control function, the project's nearly8,000-acre floodway is the site of diverse and extensiverecreational activities. Also of importance are the fish andwildlife benefits derived from the floodway's varied habitatsand the introduction of fresh water and nutrients into theLake Pontchartrain estuary.
**The POC for this page:***Jim Addison, CEMVN-PAChief, Public Affairs Office New Orleans, LA 504-862-2201  James.D.Addison@MVN02.usace.army.mil*Page last updated: 6 May 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2536 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2536

       To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Acetylbutyrolactone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2006

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Acetylbutyrolactone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-ACETYLBUTYROLACTONE.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

``      9902.10.65      2-                  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Acetylbutyrolacto                                                  31/2009
                         ne (CAS No. 517-
                         23-7) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2932.29.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 58.36 Identification.

Each licensee shall have his license card in his possession at all times while performing any function under the regulations in this subpart and shall identify himself by such card upon request.
#### §§ 4279.121-4279.124 [Reserved]
#### Wyndover Woods Properties Corp., Respondent, v. Town of Greenburgh et al., Appellants.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered March 19, 1965, reversed on the law, without costs, petition dismissed and proceeding remitted to the trial court for entry of judgment dismissing the petition and making appropriate provision as to the payment of the Referee’s fee, the amount of which as fixed by the trial court, $500, we approve; without prejudice to petitioner’s testing its rights under Local Law No. 3 of the 1965 Local Laws of the Town of Greenburgh, as amended by Local Law No. 1 of the 1966 Local Laws. We apply the law as it stands at the time of this appeal. There is now an ordinance governing the matters in issue (the above-mentioned Local Law). Petitioner may test its rights as provided by said ordinance and such other remedies as are appropriate to test the validity of said ordinance. Section III of the ordinance provides for an appeal by an aggrieved person to the Town Board. The validity of a legislative act may not be tested in a CPLR article 78 proceeding *(Matter of Neddo*v. *Schrade,*270 N. Y. 97, 102; *Casterlin*v. *Mullin,*26 A D 2d 629; CPLR 7801). Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER J. THORPE,

Petitioner,

v. 4:20cv408–WS/HTC

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, STATE OF 

FLORIDA, 

Respondent.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 14) docketed December 1, 2022. The magistrate judge recommends that

Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED. Petitioner has filed

objections (ECF No. 19) to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, and

those objections have been carefully reviewed by the undersigned. 

Upon review of the record in light of Petitioner’s objections, the court has

determined that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is due to be

Case 4:20-cv-00408-WS-HTC Document 20 Filed 02/14/23 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

adopted. Like the magistrate judge, the undersigned finds that Petitioner has failed

to demonstrate that he is entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 14) is

hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1), challenging

the conviction in State v. Thorpe, 2011–CF–1190, in Leon County, Florida, is

DENIED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "Petitioner's petition for writ of

habeas corpus is DENIED."

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of February , 2023.

s/ William Stafford

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. 

Case 4:20-cv-00408-WS-HTC Document 20 Filed 02/14/23 Page 2 of 2
#### § 54.31 OMB control number.

The information collection and recordkeeping requirements of this part have been approved by OMB under 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 and have been assigned OMB Control Number 0581-0128.

[84 FR 48563, Sept. 16, 2019]
3.909 Prohibition on providing funds to an

entity that requires certain internal

confidentiality agreements or statements.

3.909-1 Prohibition.

3.909-2 Representation by the offeror.

3.909-3 Solicitation provision and contract clause.

Parent topic: Subpart 3.9 - Whistleblower Protections for Contractor Employees
#### § 51.897 Wet.

*Wet* means that the grapes are wet from moisture from crushed, leaking, or decayed berries or from rain. Grapes which are moist from dew or other moisture condensation such as that resulting from removing grapes from a refrigerator car or cold storage to a warmer location shall not be considered as wet.

[36 FR 9126, May 20, 1971. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981. Redesignated at 56 FR 15802, Apr. 18, 1991]
#### § 51.47 Political activity.

All inspectors are forbidden, during the period of their respective appointments or while holding a valid inspectors' license to take an active part in political campaigns and a violation by a licensee shall constitute grounds for revocation of his license. All Federal employees are subject to the applicable provisions of the Department's administrative regulations relating to political activity.
#### § 51.2660 Metric conversion table.

| Inches | Millimeters (mm) |
| --- | --- |
| 8/64 equals | 3.2 |
| 16/64 equals | 6.4 |
| 24/64 equals | 9.5 |
| 32/64 equals | 12.7 |
| 40/64 equals | 15.9 |
| 48/64 equals | 19.1 |
| 51/64 equals | 20.2 |
| 52/64 equals | 20.6 |
| 54/64 equals | 21.4 |
| 56/64 equals | 22.2 |
| 1 equals | 25.4 |
| 18/64 equals | 28.6 |
| 116/64 equals | 31.8 |
| 124/64 equals | 34.9 |