alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 319.59-3 Articles prohibited importation pending risk evaluation. The articles listed in paragraph (a) of this section from the countries and localities listed in paragraph (b) of this section are prohibited from being imported or offered for entry into the United States, except as provided in § 319.59-2(b), pending the completion of an evaluation by APHIS of the potential pest risks associated with the articles. The national plant protection organization of any listed country or locality may contact APHIS[1] to initiate the preparation of a risk evaluation. If supported by the results of the risk evaluation, APHIS will take action to remove that country or locality from the list in paragraph (b) of this section. ( a ) The following articles of *Triticum* spp. (wheat) or of *Aegilops* spp. (barb goatgrass, goatgrass): Straw (other than straw, with or without heads, which has been processed or manufactured for use indoors, such as for decorative purposes or for use in toys); chaff; and products of the milling process (*i.e.,* bran, shorts, thistle sharps, and pollards) other than flour.
( b ) Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Cyprus, Egypt, Estonia, Falkland Islands, Georgia, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Libya, Lithuania, Moldova, Morocco, Nepal, North Korea, Oman, Pakistan, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Spain, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, South Africa, South Korea, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and Venezuela.
[70 FR 8231, Feb. 18, 2005, as amended at 70 FR 71212, Nov. 28, 2005; 83 FR 11866, Mar. 19, 2018] Footnotes -
319.59-3
[1] Requests should be submitted in writing to Phytosanitary Issues Management, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 140, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236.
#### § 51.1560 Damage.

“Damage” means any defect, or any combination of defects, which materially detracts from the edible or marketing quality, or the internal or external appearance of the potato, or any external defect which cannot be removed without a loss of more than 5 percent of the total weight of the potato. See Tables III, IV, V and VI in § 51.1564 and Table VII in § 51.1565.

[76 FR 31789, June 2, 2011]
#### § 4284.6 Applicant eligibility.

An outstanding judgment obtained against an applicant by the United States in a Federal Court (other than in the United States Tax Court), which has been recorded, shall cause the applicant to be ineligible to receive any assistance until the judgment is paid in full or otherwise satisfied. RBS grant funds may not be used to satisfy the judgment.
(April 25, 1967)

#### In the Matter of Sidney J. Ungar, an Attorney.

Respondent’s motion for reconsideration is denied. The motion is grounded on *Spevack*v. *Klein*(385 U. S. 511). Respondent expressly abandoned his reliance on his Federal privilege against self incrimination (U. S. Const., 5th Amdt.). He did not raise the question in the Court of Appeals or on his application for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. *Spevaek*prohibits a waiver of the privilege under the compulsion of the threat of loss of employment. It does not inhibit the use in a disciplinary proceeding of testimony resulting from respondent’s immunity from prosecution therefor. The Fifth Amendment proscribes compelled testimony in “ any criminal case ”, Although forfeiture proceedings have been held to be in the nature of criminal proceedings *(Plymouth Sedan*v. *Pennsylvania,*380 U. S. 693), it has not been held that a disciplinary proceeding is in the nature of a criminal cause. The constitutional question respondent belatedly seeks to revive does not affect the charges based on the contempt adjudication against the respondent *(Ungar*v. *Sarafite,*376 U. S. 575) and respondent’s contumacious conduct in the trial of *People*v. *Jack*(12 N Y 2d 721) heretofore sustained *(Matter of Ungar,*25 A D 2d 322, app. dsmd. 18 N Y 2d 690, cert. den. 385 U. S. 1006), and are sufficient to warrant disbarment. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

1
31.107 Contracts with State, local, and federally recognized Indian tribal governments.       (a)                   subpart  31.6 provides principles and standards for determining costs applicable to contracts with State, local, and federally recognized Indian tribal governments. They provide the basis for a uniform approach to the problem of determining costs and to promote efficiency and better relationships between State, local, and federally recognized Indian tribal governments, and Federal Government entities. They apply to all programs that involve contracts with State, local, and federally recognized Indian tribal governments, except contracts with-                                                         (1) 								                Publicly financed educational institutions subject to subpart  31.3; or                                                            (2) 								                Publicly owned hospitals and other providers of medical care subject to requirements promulgated by the sponsoring Government agencies.                                                                             (b) 						            The Office of Management and Budget will approve any other exceptions in particular cases when adequate justification is presented.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 31.1 - Applicability
# 9.109-5 Solicitation provision.

Unless the exception at 9.109-3 applies, the *contracting officer**shall* include the provision at 52.209-13, Violation of Arms Control Treaties or Agreements-Certification, in each *solicitation* for the *acquisition* of *products* or services (including *construction*) that exceeds the *simplified acquisition threshold*, other than *solicitations* for the *acquisition* of *commercial products* or *commercial services*.

**Parent topic:**9.109 Prohibition on contracting with an entity involved in activities that violate arms control treaties or agreements with the United States.
PROMISSORY NOTE

 

|   | $9,000,000.00 | Springfield, Illinois |
|--------|---------------|-----------------------|

____________ ____, 20__

 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, EVEREST HICKORY GLEN, LP, a Kansas limited partnership, as maker, having its principal place of business at c/o Everest Properties, 199 South Los Robles Avenue, Suite 200, Pasadena, California 91101 (“Borrower”), hereby unconditionally promises to pay to the order of LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, FSB, a federal stock savings bank, having its principal place of business at c/o Lehman Brothers, Inc., 1000 West Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attention: John Herman (“Lender”), or at such other place as the holder hereof may from time to time designate in writing, the principal sum of Nine Million and 00/100 Dollars ($9,000,000.00), in lawful money of the United States of America with interest thereon to be computed from the date of disbursement under this Note at the Applicable Interest Rate (defined below), and to be paid in installments as provided herein.

 

| 1 . | CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS |
|-----|-----------------------|

 

As used herein, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:

 

(a)       “Accrual Period” shall mean the period commencing on the eleventh (11th) day of a calendar month and ending on the tenth (10th) day of the succeeding calendar month; provided that if this Note is dated as of any date other than the eleventh (11th) day of a month, the first Accrual Period shall (i) consist of only the date hereof, if the date hereof is the tenth (10th) day of a month, or (ii) commence on the date hereof and shall end on the next tenth (10th) day of a calendar month to occur after the date hereof.

 

(b)       “Applicable Interest Rate” shall mean an interest rate equal to Five and Ninety-Four Hundredths Percent (5.94%) per annum.

 

|   | (c) | “Loan” shall mean the loan evidenced by this Note. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

(d)       “Loan Documents’’ shall mean this Note, the Security Instrument, and any other documents or instruments which now or shall hereafter wholly or partially secure or guarantee payment of this Note or which have otherwise been executed by Borrower and/or any other person in connection with the Loan.

 

(e)       “Lockout Period Expiration Date” shall mean the earlier of (a) the fourth (4th) anniversary of the date hereof, and (b) two years and one day from the “startup day” of any “real estate mortgage investment conduit” (as such terms are defined in Sections 860G and 860D, respectively, of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended or any successor statute thereto) which may acquire the Loan.

 

|   | (f) | “Maturity Date” shall mean January 11, 2012. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

----
§ 3565.304 Lender loan processing responsibilities. ( a ) *Application.* The lender will be responsible for submitting an application for a loan guarantee in a format prescribed by the Agency. Lenders may submit an application at the feasibility stage or when they request a conditional commitment.
( b ) *Project servicing, management and disposition.* Unless otherwise permitted by the Agency, the originating lender must perform all loan functions during the period of the guarantee. These functions include servicing, asset management, and, if necessary, property disposition. The lender must maintain and service the loan in accordance with the provisions of subpart I of this part and Agency servicing procedures.
§ 51.2105 U.S. Fancy. “U.S. Fancy” consists of shelled almonds of similar varietal characteristics which are whole, clean and well dried, and which are free from decay, rancidity, insect injury, foreign material, doubles, split or broken kernels, particles and dust, and free from injury caused by chipped and scratched kernels, and free from damage caused by mold, gum, shriveling, brown spot or other means. (See §§ 51.2113 and 51.2114.) In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, the following tolerances, by weight, shall be permitted: ( a ) *For dissimilar varieties.* 5 percent, including not more than one-fifth of this amount, or 1 percent, for bitter almonds mixed with sweet almonds;
( b ) *For doubles.* 3 percent;
( c ) *For kernels injured by chipping and/or scratching.* 5 percent;
( d ) *For foreign material.* One-twentieth of 1 percent (0.05 percent). No part of this percentage shall be allowed for glass and metal;
( e ) *For particles and dust.* One-tenth of 1 percent (0.10 percent); and,
( f ) *For other defects.* 2 percent, including not more than one-half of this amount, or 1 percent, for split or broken kernels, and including not more than one-half of the former amount, or 1 percent, for seriously damaged kernels.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No: 5:03cr5/MCR

5:08cv266/MCR/MD

STACY L. BUTLER

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes onfor consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated August 27, 2008. The defendant previously has been

furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an

objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 153) is summarily DISMISSED as untimely.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of October, 2008.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:03-cr-00005-MCR-CJK Document 84 Filed 10/08/08 Page 1 of 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00163

- CR

Jerry VILLARREAL

, Appellant

v.

The State of

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR10521W

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARIO N, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED May 15, 2013.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No: 5:03cr42/MCR

5:06cv238/MCR/MD

WILLARD TIMOTHY CARROLL

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for considerationuponthe magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated April 5, 2007. The defendant previously has been furnished

a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Havingconsidered the report and recommendation and any objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (doc. 75) is

DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of April, 2007.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:03-cr-00042-MCR-MD Document 88 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 241 

To amend section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 to provide that 

funds received as universal service contributions and the universal service 

support programs established pursuant to that section are not subject 

to certain provisions of title 31, United States Code, commonly known 

as the Antideficiency Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2005 

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. STEVENS, and Mr. 

INOUYE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 

to provide that funds received as universal service contributions and the universal service support programs 

established pursuant to that section are not subject to 

certain provisions of title 31, United States Code, commonly known as the Antideficiency Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 241 IS 

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 

2 1934. 

3 Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

4 U.S.C. 254) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(m) APPLICATION OF ANTIDEFICIENCY ACT.—Sec7 tion 1341 and subchapter II of chapter 15 of title 31, 

8 United States Code, do not apply— 

9 ‘‘(1) to any amount collected or received as 

10 Federal universal service contributions required by 

11 this section, including any interest earned on such 

12 contributions; nor 

13 ‘‘(2) to the expenditure or obligation of 

14 amounts attributable to such contributions for uni15 versal service support programs established pursuant 

16 to this section.’’. 

Æ
2006-0857.

#### Shaheen v. Snyder.

Tuscarawas App. No. 2005AP090070, 2006-Ohio-1492. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
# 22.103 Overtime.

- 22.103-1 Definition. 
- 22.103-2 Policy. 
- 22.103-3 Procedures. 
- 22.103-4 Approvals. 
- 22.103-5 Contract clauses. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 22.1 - Basic Labor Policies
APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-0185.

#### State v. Siler.

Ashland App. No. 02 COA 028, 2003-Ohio-5749. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2005-0773, *State v. Stahl,*Summit App. No. 22261, 2005-Ohio-1137; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., would accept the appeal without holding.

Lanzinger, J., dissents.
9.108-2 Prohibition.

(a) Section 745 of Division D of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Pub. L. 110-161) and its

successor provisions in subsequent appropriations acts (and as extended in continuing resolutions)

prohibit, on a Governmentwide basis, the use of appropriated (or otherwise made available) funds

for contracts with either an inverted domestic corporation, or a subsidiary of such a corporation,

except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section and in 9.108-4 Waiver.

(b)

(1) Section 745 and its successor provisions include the following exception: This section shall not

apply to any Federal Government contract entered into before the date of the enactment of this Act,

or to any task order issued pursuant to such contract.

(2) To ensure appropriate application of the prohibition and this exception, contracting officers

should consult with legal counsel if, during the performance of a contract, a contractor becomes an

inverted domestic corporation or a subsidiary of one.

Parent topic: 9.108 Prohibition on contracting with inverted domestic corporations.
#### Richard Dubi et al., Appellants, v Jericho Fire District et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 18, 2007;

decided September 11, 2007

Reported below, 22 AD3d 631.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]).
23.601 Requirements.       (a) 						            The clause at 52.223-7, Notice of Radioactive Materials, requires the contractor to notify the contracting officer prior to delivery of radioactive material.                                          (b) 						            Upon receipt of the notice, the contracting officer shall notify receiving activities so that appropriate safeguards can be taken.                                          (c) 						            The clause permits the contracting officer to waive the notification if the contractor states that the notification on prior deliveries is still current. The contracting officer may waive the notice only after consultation with cognizant technical representatives.                                          (d) 						            The contracting officer is required to specify in the clause at 52.223-7, the number of days in advance of delivery that the contractor will provide notification. The determination of the number of days should be done in coordination with the installation/facility radiation protection officer (RPO). The RPO is responsible for insuring the proper license, authorization or permit is obtained prior to receipt of the radioactive material.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 23.6 - Notice of Radioactive Material
§ 51.2730 U.S. No. 1 Spanish. “U.S. No. 1 Spanish” consists of shelled Spanish type peanut kernels which are whole and free from foreign material, damage and minor defects, and which will not pass through a screen having 15 ⁄ 64 × 3 ⁄ 4 inch openings. ( a ) In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, the following tolerances, by weight, shall be permitted: ( 1 ) 1 percent for other types of peanuts;
( 2 ) 3 percent for sound peanuts which are split or broken;
( 3 ) 1.5 percent for damaged or unshelled peanuts;
( 4 ) 0.5 percent for minor defects: *Provided,* That in addition, any unused part of the tolerance for damaged or unshelled peanuts shall be allowed for minor defects;
( 5 ) 0.1 percent for foreign material; and,
( 6 ) 2 percent for sound whole peanuts which will pass through the prescribed screen.
#### § 51.2005 Badly misshapen.

*Badly misshapen* means that the kernel is so malformed that the appearance is materially affected.
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.1900 Termination of participation as a RBIC.

You may not terminate your participation as a RBIC without the Agency's prior written approval. Your request for approval must be accompanied by an offer of immediate repayment of all of your outstanding Leverage (including any prepayment penalties thereon), or by a plan satisfactory to the Agency for the orderly liquidation of the RBIC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1998, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,645,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,200
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       8,390,800
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,510,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,979,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          472,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,979,700
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               769,700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  550,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (20,300)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                236,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            236,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   236,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of KCAP Financial, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report), I, Edward U. Gilpin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 9, 2017

          

          By:/s/ Edward U. GilpinEdward U. GilpinChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)