alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 5:97-cv-00039-RH Document 17 Filed 04/07/99 Page 1 of 4
Case 5:97-cv-00039-RH Document 17 Filed 04/07/99 Page 2 of 4
Case 5:97-cv-00039-RH Document 17 Filed 04/07/99 Page 3 of 4
Case 5:97-cv-00039-RH Document 17 Filed 04/07/99 Page 4 of 4
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2623 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 40% Polymer acid salt/polymer amide 

60% butyl acetate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24, 2006 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. DEWINE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 40% Polymer acid salt/ 

polymer amide 60% butyl acetate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 40% POLYMER ACID SALT/POLYMER AMIDE 60% 

4 BUTYL ACETATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.29.32 40% Polymer acid salt/polymer amide 60% butyl acetate (CAS Nos. P–98–288 

and 123–86–4) (provided for 

in subheading 3208.90.00) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 2623 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
23.704 Electronic products environmental

assessment tool.

(a)

(1) General. As required by E.O.s 13423 and 13514, agencies, when acquiring an electronic product

to meet their requirements, shall meet at least 95 percent of those requirements with Electronic

Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT®)-registered electronic products, unless-

(i) There is no EPEAT® standard for such product;

(ii) No EPEAT®-registered product meets agency requirements; or

(iii) The agency head has provided an exemption in accordance with 23.105.

(2) Contracting officers, when acquiring an electronic product, except as specified in paragraphs

(a)(1)(i), (ii), or (iii) of this section, shall acquire an EPEAT®-registered electronic product, unless

the agency determines, in accordance with agency procedures, that the EPEAT®-registered product

will not be cost effective over the life of the product.

(3) This section applies to acquisitions of electronic products to be used in the United States, unless

otherwise provided by agency procedures. When acquiring electronic products to be used outside

the United States, agencies must use their best efforts to comply with this section.

(b) Personal computer products, imaging equipment, and televisions. These are categories of

EPEAT®-registered electronic products.

(1) The IEEE 1680.1TM-2009 Standard for the Environmental Assessment of Personal Computer

Products, the IEEE 1680.2TM-2012 Standard for the Environmental Assessment of Imaging

Equipment, and the IEEE 1680.3TM-2012 Standard for the Environmental Assessment of Televisions-

(i) Were as issued by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., on March 5, 2010;

October 19, 2012, and October 19, 2012, respectively;

(ii) Are voluntary consensus standards consistent with section 12(d) of Public Law 104-113, the

"National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995", (see 11.101(b));

(iii) Meet EPA-issued guidance on environmentally preferable products and services; and

(iv) Are described in more detail at

https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/recommendations-specifications-standards-and-ecolabels-fede

ral-purchasing.

(2) A list of EPEAT® product categories and EPEAT®-registered electronic products that are in

conformance with these standards can be found at

https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/recommendations-specifications-standards-and-ecolabels-fede

ral-purchasing.

(3) EPEAT® electronic products are designated "bronze–," "silver–," or "gold–" registered.
(4) Agencies shall, at a minimum, acquire EPEAT® bronze-registered products.

(5) Agencies are encouraged to acquire EPEAT® silver– or gold–registered products.

Parent topic: Subpart 23.7 - Contracting for Environmentally Preferable Products and Services
§ 56.17 Equipment and facilities for graders. Equipment and facilities to be furnished by the applicant for use of graders in performing service on a resident basis shall include, but not be limited to, the following: ( a ) ( 1 ) An accurate metal stem thermometer;
( 2 ) Electronic digital-display scales graduated in increments of 1 ⁄ 10-ounce or less for weighing individual eggs and test weights for calibrating such scales. Plants packing product based on metric weight must provide scales graduated in increments of 1-gram or less;
( 3 ) Electronic digital-display scales graduated in increments of 1 ⁄ 4-ounce or less for weighing the lightest and heaviest consumer packages packed in the plant and test weights for calibrating such scales;
( 4 ) Scales graduated in increments of 1 ⁄ 4-pound or less for weighing shipping containers and test weights for calibrating such scales;
( 5 ) Two candling lights that provide a sufficient combined illumination through both the aperture and downward through the bottom to facilitate accurate interior and exterior quality determinations.
( 6 ) A candling booth adequately darkened and located in close proximity to the work area that is reasonably free of excessive noise. The booth must be sufficient in size to accommodate two graders, two candling lights, and other necessary grading equipment.
( b ) Furnished office space, a desk, and file or storage cabinets (equipped with a satisfactory locking device) suitable for the security and storage of official supplies, and other facilities and equipment as may otherwise be required. Such space and equipment must meet the approval of the national supervisor.
[32 FR 8230, June 8, 1967. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 39570, Aug. 4, 1981. Redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 60 FR 12402, Mar. 7, 1995; 63 FR 13330, Mar. 19, 1998; 69 FR 76375, Dec. 21, 2004; 71 FR 42008, July 24, 2006]
§ 51.3056 Application of tolerances. ( a ) The contents of individual packages in the lot, based on sample inspection, are subject to the following limitations: *Provided,* That the averages for the entire lot are within the tolerances specified for the grade: ( 1 ) For packages which contain more than 20 avocados and a tolerance of 10 percent or more is provided, individual packages in any lot shall have not more than one and one-half times the tolerance specified. For packages which contain more than 20 avocados and a tolerance of less than 10 percent is provided, individual packages in any lot shall have not more than double the tolerance specified, except that at least one defective and one off-size specimen may be permitted in any package; and,
( 2 ) For packages which contain 20 avocados or less, individual packages shall have not more than double the tolerance specified, except that at least one defective and one off-size specimen may be permitted in any package.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            3101
<SECURITIES>                                      2946
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9411
<ALLOWANCES>                                        64
<INVENTORY>                                       1262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 17038
<PP&E>                                             819
<DEPRECIATION>                                     723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   20068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            14251
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             1200
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                        3640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     20068
<SALES>                                          23745
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 23745
<CGS>                                            22630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   466
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    27
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     82
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 74
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        74
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Public Hearing Attendees

Test Procedures for Water Heaters, Ranges,Ovens, Cooktops and

Microwave Ovens and Clothes Washers

Docket Number EE-RM-94-230

Forrestal Building, Room IE-245 July 12, 1995

Panel Members

Ingrid M. Watson

Presiding Official

Program Manager

Kitchen Products

Marc LaFrance

Profram Manager

Clothes Washers

Bryan Berringer

Program Manager

Water Heaters

Eugene Margolis

Attorney

Steve Nabinger

Test Engineer

Kitchen Products

Brian Dougherty

Test Engineer

Water Heaters

Jim Kao

Test Engineer

Clothes Washers

Office of Codes and Standards

U.S. Department of Energy

Office of Codes and Standards

U.S. Department of Energy

Office of Codes and Standards

U.S. Department of Energy

Office of General Counsel

U.S. Department of Energy

National Institute of Standards and Technology

NationaLInstitute of Standards and Technology

National Institute of Standards and Technology

*__6 b

EE-RM-94-230 COMMENT 0B
SCHEDULE OF PRESENTATIONS

Opening Remarks

Ingrid M. Watson

Presiding Official

Scheduled Sneakers

Water Heaters

1. Frank Stanonik

2. Matt Chwalowski

Ragesw

4. Jack Weizeorick

5. Charles Samuels

Organization

GAMA

Edison Electric Institute

AHAM

AHAM

Microwave Ovens

Jack Weizeorick

Dennis Wilson

Joy Daniels

AHAM

Frigidaire

Sharp

LUNCH BREAK

Clothes Washers

9. Charles Samuels

10. Curt Riechman

11. Earl Jones

12. Larry Hawkins

13. Dick Stilwell

AHAM

Whirlpool

General Electric

General Electric

Maytag

UNSCHEDULED SPEAKERS

REBUTTAL STATEMENTS

QUESTIONS

Time

9:30

9:50

10:05

6.

7.

8.

10:20

10:35

10:50

11:00

11:15

11:45

12:45

12:55

1:10

1:25

1:40

2:10

2:40

3:10

EE-RM-94-230 COMMENT 0B
GE Appliances

Beth A. McClurg

Proauct Manager

Laundry

General Electric Comoany

Appliance Park, AP1.2NC-1, Lousville, KY 40225

502 452-4476 Dial Comm 8'334-4476

Fax 502 452-0924

Test Procedures for Water Heaters, Ranges, Ovens

Cooktops and Microwave Ovens and Clothes Washers

July 12, 1996

&A , . I.

-O C f . If C I_ I l

Prod eL t c ItM V :a __

-ir 5Y v I-- -- 4-)2 - A P-2/\JCS V Z- _-- 7 Fax No.- S-2-_ 9 2 - Telephone _ Fax No. -

Name

Title

Address (S n / \ Ce 5&

P., .4-4-

EE-RM-94-230 COMMENT 0B
Test Procedures for Water Heaters, Ranges, Ovens

Cooktops and Microwave Ovens and Clothes Washers

July 12, 1995

Name

Title

Address

Be;C. H M C.CifL

Productf la .XctLePa4'

6c App/,l,'c ., A-PI-- 2 C-/

v 1o. ^

LOL' V' { V j') 41 e )K a -1 C) Z- 2 _S_

Telephone C2-452 L2- No. „ 2 - 4 S 2- 9 .

~~________Fax No. _____

EE-RM-94-230 COMMENT 0B
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ex rel. RAYME M. EDLER, M.D.,
Civil No. 3:20-ev-05503-MCR-HTC
Plaintiff,
(FILED UNDER SEAL)
vs.

ESCAMBIA COUNTY,

Defendants.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S NOTICE OF ELECTION TO
DECLINE INTERVENTION

Pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(4)(B), the United States
notifies the Court of its decision not to intervene in this action relating to the claims
in the Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 58-1].

Although the United States declines to intervene, we respectfully refer the
Court to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1), which allows the relator to maintain the action in
the name of the United States; providing, however, that the “action may be dismissed
only if the court and the Attorney General give written consent to the dismissal and
their reasons for consenting.” Jd. Therefore, the United States requests that, should
either the relator or the defendant propose that this action be dismissed, settled, or

otherwise discontinued, this Court solicit the written consent of the United States

30 FLND PN 1
99 men 1,)



before ruling or granting its approval. Furthermore, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. §
3730(c)(3), the United States requests that all pleadings filed in this action be served
upon the United States; the United States also requests that orders issued by the Court
be sent to the Government’s counsel. The United States reserves its right to order
any deposition transcripts, to intervene in this action, for good cause, at a later date,
and to seek the dismissal of the relator’s action or claim. The United States also
requests that it be served with all notices of appeal.

Finally, the Government requests that the relator’s Second Amended

Complaint and this Notice be unsealed.

Respectfully submitted,

JASON R. COODY
United States Attorney

4s/ Marie A. Moyle
MARIE A. MOYLE, ESQ.

Assistant United States Attorney

Florida Bar No. 1003498

Email: marie.moyle@usdoj.gov

111 N. Adams Street, 4° Floor
Tallahassee, FL 32301

Telephone: 850-942-8430

Fax: 850-942-8466

Counsel for the United States of America


LOCAL RULE 7.1(F)

I] HEREBY CERTIFY that this memorandum contains 250 words, per
Microsoft Word’s word count, which complies with the word limit requirements set

forth in Local Rule 7.1(F).

/s/ Marie A. Moyle
Marie A. Moyle
Assistant U.S. Attorney
#### § 51.2834 U.S. No. 1 Picklers.

*U.S. No. 1 Picklers* consists of onions which meet all the requirements for the U.S. No. 1 grade except for size. (See § 51.2830.) Size: The maximum diameter of onions of this grade shall be not more than 1 inch. (See § 51.2837.)
EXHIBIT 31.01
CERTIFICATION
       I, Michael D. Alexander, certifythat:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of The Furia Organization, Inc. for the three month period ended December31, 2003;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this quarterly report; 
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and have

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date");and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

6.     The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 5, 2005

By:

/s/ Michael D. Alexander    
  
Michael D. Alexander
  
Chief Executive Officer
 
****
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Michael Hill, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Gemini Explorations,
      Inc.. for the year ended April 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Gemini Explorations, Inc.                                                               

Dated: February 6, 2012

| | /s/
      Michael Hill                                         
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | Michael Hill                                                   
| | President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary
      Treasurer  
| | and Director                                                   
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer
| | and Principal Accounting Officer)                              
| | Gemini Explorations, Inc.                                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Gemini
Explorations, Inc. and will be retained by Gemini Explorations, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
52.211-5 Material Requirements.       As prescribed in 11.304, insert the following clause:          Material Requirements (Aug 2000)                                       (a)                   *Definitions*.                As used in this clause-                *New* means composed of previously unused components, whether manufactured from virgin material, recovered material in the form of raw material, or materials and by-products generated from, and reused within, an original manufacturing process; *provided* that the supplies meet contract requirements, including but not limited to, performance, reliability, and life expectancy.                *Reconditioned* means restored to the original normal operating condition by readjustments and material replacement.                *Recovered material* means waste materials and by-products recovered or diverted from solid waste, but the term does not include those materials and by-products generated from, and commonly reused within, an original manufacturing process.                *Remanufactured* means factory rebuilt to original specifications.                *Virgin material* means-(1) Previously unused raw material, including previously unused copper, aluminum, lead, zinc, iron, other metal or metal ore; or                                                                     (2) Any undeveloped resource that is, or with new technology will become, a source of raw materials.                                                                                                   (b) 						            Unless this contract otherwise requires virgin material or supplies composed of or manufactured from virgin material, the Contractor shall provide supplies that are new, reconditioned, or remanufactured, as defined in this clause.                                          (c) 						            A proposal to provide unused former Government surplus property shall include a complete description of the material, the quantity, the name of the Government agency from which acquired, and the date of acquisition.                                          (d) 						            A proposal to provide used, reconditioned, or remanufactured supplies shall include a detailed description of such supplies and shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer for approval.                                          (e) 						            Used, reconditioned, or remanufactured supplies, or unused former Government surplus property, may be used in contract performance if the Contractor has proposed the use of such supplies, and the Contracting Officer has authorized their use.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.211 [Reserved]