UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
     ACT OF 1934

                       For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                    For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14099


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



         California                                             94-2940204
(State or other jurisdiction of                              (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                             Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)


                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     Financial Statements


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                 March 31, 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $ 165
   Receivables and deposits                                                      29
   Other assets                                                                 114
   Investment property:
      Land                                                    $ 916
      Buildings and related personal property                 10,408
                                                              11,324
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (5,772)         5,552

                                                                            $ 5,860
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficit) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 45
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                          104
   Accrued property taxes                                                        81
   Other liabilities                                                            114
   Due to affiliates                                                             12
   Mortgage note payable                                                      5,156

Partners' (Deficit) Capital
   General partner                                             $ (2)
   Special limited partners                                      (73)
   Limited partners (181,300 units issued and
      outstanding)                                               423            348

                                                                            $ 5,860

                See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                Three Months Ended
                                                                     March 31,
                                                                 2003          2002
Revenues:
<S>                                                             <C>           <C>
   Rental income                                                $ 412         $ 424
   Other income                                                     60            45
      Total revenues                                               472           469

Expenses:
   Operating                                                       205           174
   General and administrative                                       26            43
   Depreciation                                                    119           111
   Interest                                                        103           107
   Property taxes                                                   39            30
      Total expenses                                               492           465

Net (loss) income                                               $ (20)         $ 4

Net (loss) income allocated to general partner (0.2%)            $ --          $ --

Net (loss) income allocated to limited partners (99.8%)            (20)            4
                                                                $ (20)         $ 4

Net (loss) income per limited partnership unit                  $ (.11)       $ .02


                See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

                             CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
              CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIT) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                    Limited                 Special
                                  Partnership    General    Limited   Limited
                                     Units       Partner   Partners   Partners     Total

<S>                                 <C>            <C>       <C>      <C>         <C>
Original capital contributions      181,808        $ 1       $ --     $45,452     $45,453

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at December 31, 2002             181,300       $ (2)      $ (73)    $ 443       $ 368

Net loss for the three
   months ended March 31, 2003           --          --         --        (20)        (20)

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at March 31, 2003                181,300       $ (2)      $ (73)    $ 423       $ 348


                See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                     March 31,
                                                                   2003       2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>           <C>
  Net (loss) income                                              $ (20)        $ 4
  Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net
   cash provided by operating activities:
   Depreciation                                                     119          111
   Amortization of loan costs                                         2            2
  Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                       (4)          42
      Other assets                                                   (1)         (28)
      Accounts payable                                                6           46
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                             6           (1)
      Accrued property taxes                                        (31)         (35)
      Other liabilities                                               4            2
      Due to affiliates                                              12           --
         Net cash provided by operating activities                   93          143

Cash flows used in investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                            (68)        (164)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                 (38)         (35)
  Payments on advances from affiliates                               --          (53)
         Net cash used in financing activities                      (38)         (88)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                           (13)        (109)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    178          240
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                       $ 165        $ 131

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                         $ 101        $ 106

                See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying  unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements of Consolidated
Capital  Properties VI (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial  statements.  In the opinion of ConCap  Equities,  Inc.  ("CEI" or the
"General  Partner"),  all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating
results  for the  three  months  ended  March  31,  2003,  are  not  necessarily
indicative  of the  results  that may be  expected  for the fiscal  year  ending
December 31, 2003. For further information,  refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's  Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. The General  Partner is
an  affiliate  of Apartment  Investment  and  Management  Company  ("AIMCO"),  a
publicly traded real estate investment trust.

Note B - Related Party Transactions

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership.

Affiliates of the General  Partner are entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts
from  the  Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management services. The Partnership paid such affiliates  approximately $24,000
and $30,000 for the three  months  ended March 31, 2003 and 2002,  respectively,
which is included in operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of  the  General  Partner  earned  reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $11,000 and $26,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002,  respectively,  which is included in
general and  administrative  expenses.  The fees for 2003 remained  unpaid as of
March 31, 2003.

The Partnership Agreement also provides for a special management fee equal to 9%
of the total  distributions  made from operations to the Limited  Partners to be
paid  to  the  General  Partner  for  executive  and  administrative  management
services.  No such fee was earned for the three  months  ended March 31, 2003 or
2002.

The  Partnership  had  advances  from an  affiliate  of the  General  Partner of
approximately  $139,000 as of December 31,  2001.  During the three months ended
March 31, 2002, the  Partnership  repaid  approximately  $55,000 of this advance
including  approximately $2,000 in accrued interest. The balance of this advance
was repaid during the remainder of 2002.  Interest was charged at the prime rate
plus 2% and  amounted to  approximately  $2,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2002.  There were no loans from the General  Partner or associated  interest
expense during the three months ended March 31, 2003.

The  Partnership  insures its  property up to certain  limits  through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability.  The Partnership  insures its property above the AIMCO limits through
insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the General
Partner.  During 2003 and 2002, the  Partnership's  insurance  coverage and fees
associated  with policy claims  administration  owed to AIMCO and its affiliates
will be approximately $21,000 and $25,000, respectively.

Note C - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order granting in part the demurrer.  The Court has dismissed without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General Partner and affiliated  defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002,
the Court held a hearing on plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took
the matter under submission after further briefing, as ordered by the court, was
submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002, the Court entered an order vacating
the trial date of  January  13,  2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and  discovery
cut-off dates) and stayed the case in its entirety  through  November 7, 2002 so
that the parties could have an opportunity to discuss settlement. On October 30,
2002, the court entered an order  extending the stay in effect  through  January
10, 2003.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action  described below. On April
4, 2003, the Court preliminarily approved the settlement and scheduled a hearing
on final approval for June 2, 2003.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of  settlement)  and up to $ 1 million toward the cost
of independent  appraisals of the Partnerships'  properties by a Court appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make a tender
offer to purchase all of the partnership  interests in the  Partnerships  within
one year of final approval,  if it is granted,  and to provide partners with the
independent  appraisals at the time of these  tenders.  The proposed  settlement
also  provides  for the  limitation  of the  allowable  costs  which the General
Partner or its affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships in connection with this
litigation  and  imposes  limits  on the  class  counsel  fees and costs in this
litigation.  On April 11,  2003,  notice was  distributed  to  limited  partners
providing the details of the proposed settlement.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike the  complaint.  On December  11, 2001,  the court heard  argument on the
motions and took the matters under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court
served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the Heller
complaint  as a violation  of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On
March 27, 2002, the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking the
complaint.  Before completing briefing on the appeal, the parties stayed further
proceedings  in the  appeal  pending  the  Court's  review  of the  terms of the
proposed settlement described above.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs,  associated with these cases will be material
to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

ITEM 2.     Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  The discussions of the  Registrant's
business  and  results  of  operations,   including  forward-looking  statements
pertaining to such matters,  do not take into account the effects of any changes
to the  Registrant's  business  and results of  operations.  Actual  results may
differ  materially  from those described in the  forward-looking  statements and
will  be  affected  by  a  variety  of  risks  and  factors  including,  without
limitation:  national and local economic  conditions;  the terms of governmental
regulations that affect the Registrant and interpretations of those regulations;
the competitive  environment in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks,
including the risk that cash flows from  operations may be  insufficient to meet
required  payments of  principal  and  interest;  real estate  risks,  including
variations  of real  estate  values and the  general  economic  climate in local
markets and competition for tenants in such markets; and possible  environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment property consists of one apartment complex, Colony
of Springdale Apartments, located in Springdale, Ohio. The average occupancy for
the  three  month  periods  ended  March  31,  2003 and  2002,  was 89% and 94%,
respectively.  The decrease in occupancy at The Colony of Springdale  Apartments
is due to a decline in market  conditions  and an increase in home  purchases by
tenants.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's  net loss for the  three  months  ended  March  31,  2003 was
approximately  $20,000  compared to net income of  approximately  $4,000 for the
corresponding  period in 2002.  Net income  decreased for the three months ended
March 31, 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002 as a result of an increase
in total expenses offset by a slight increase in total revenues.  Total expenses
increased for the three months ended March 31, 2003 primarily due to an increase
in operating  expenses and property tax expenses  partially offset by a decrease
in general  and  administrative  expenses.  Depreciation  and  interest  expense
remained  relatively  constant for the  comparable  periods.  Operating  expense
increased due to an increase in maintenance and property  expenses.  Maintenance
expenses  increased  primarily due to an increase in contract  services and snow
removal expenses at the  Partnership's  property.  Property  expenses  increased
primarily due to an increase in utility expenses. Property tax expense increased
due to an increase in the assessed value of the Partnership's property.

General and  administrative  expenses decreased for the three months ended March
31, 2003 due to a decrease in the cost of  services  included in the  management
reimbursements   to  the  General  Partner  as  allowed  under  the  Partnership
Agreement.  Also  included in general and  administrative  expenses at March 31,
2003 are costs  associated  with the  quarterly and annual  communications  with
investors  and  regulatory  agencies  and  the  annual  audit  required  by  the
Partnership Agreement.

Total revenues increased  primarily due to an increase in other income,  largely
offset by a decrease in rental income. Other income increased due to an increase
in utility  reimbursements and late fees. Rental revenue decreased primarily due
to a decrease in  occupancy  and an  increase  in bad debt  expense at Colony of
Springdale Apartments, partially offset by an increase in average rental rates.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner
monitors the rental market environment of its investment  property to assess the
feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and
protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the
General  Partner  attempts  to  protect  the  Partnership  from  the  burden  of
inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a
high overall occupancy level. However, due to changing market conditions,  which
can  result in the use of rental  concessions  and rental  reductions  to offset
softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the General Partner will
be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  March  31,  2003,  the  Partnership   had  cash  and  cash   equivalents  of
approximately  $165,000  compared to  approximately  $131,000 at March 31, 2002.
Cash and cash equivalents  decreased by approximately $13,000 since December 31,
2002 due to  approximately  $68,000  and $38,000 of cash used in  investing  and
financing activities, respectively, partially offset by approximately $93,000 of
cash  provided  by  operating  activities.  Cash  used in  investing  activities
consisted  of property  improvements  and  replacements.  Cash used in financing
activities  consisted of principal payments made on the mortgage encumbering the
Partnership's  property. The Partnership invests its working capital reserves in
interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal,  state,
and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  General  Partner  monitors
developments in the area of legal and regulatory  compliance and is studying new
federal laws,  including the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002  mandates  or suggests  additional  compliance  measures  with regard to
governance,  disclosure,  audit and other areas. In light of these changes,  the
Partnership  expects that it will incur higher  expenses  related to compliance,
including increased legal and audit fees. Capital  improvements  planned for the
Partnership's property are discussed below.

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2003,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $68,000  of  capital  improvements  at the  property,  consisting
primarily of structural improvements,  gutters, parking area improvements,  roof
replacements,   floor  covering   replacements  and  heating   upgrades.   These
improvements were funded from operating cash flow. The Partnership evaluates the
capital  improvement needs of the property during the year and currently expects
to complete an additional $43,000 in capital  improvements  during the remainder
of 2003.  The additional  capital  improvements  will consist  primarily of roof
replacement,  floor covering, HVAC and appliance replacements and concrete work.
Additional  capital  improvements  may be  considered  and  will  depend  on the
physical  condition  of the  property  as  well  as the  anticipated  cash  flow
generated by the property and Partnership reserves.

The  Partnership's  assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term  needs
(exclusive  of  capital   improvements)   of  the   Partnership.   The  mortgage
indebtedness of approximately  $5,156,000 matures December 1, 2019 at which time
the mortgage is scheduled to be fully amortized.

The  Partnership  did not make any  distributions  during the three months ended
March 31, 2003 and 2002. Future cash  distributions will depend on the levels of
net cash generated from  operations,  the  availability of cash reserves and the
timing of the debt maturity, refinancing and/or property sale. The Partnership's
cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis.  There can be no
assurance that the Partnership  will generate  sufficient funds from operations,
after required  capital  expenditures,  to permit  distributions to its partners
during the remainder of 2003 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 91,747 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 50.61% of the outstanding Units at
March 31, 2003. A number of these Units were acquired  pursuant to tender offers
made by AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is possible  that AIMCO or its  affiliates
will acquire additional units of limited partnership interest in the Partnership
in  exchange  for  cash or a  combination  of cash and  units  in the  operating
partnership of AIMCO either through  private  purchases or tender offers.  Under
the  Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders  holding a  majority  of the Units are
entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters which would include
voting on certain  amendments to the Partnership  Agreement and voting to remove
the General  Partner.  As a result of its ownership of 50.61% of the outstanding
Units,  AIMCO is in a position to control all voting  decisions  with respect to
the  Partnership.  Although  the General  Partner owes  fiduciary  duties to the
limited  partners of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner also owes fiduciary
duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.  As a result, the duties of the General
Partner,  as general  partner,  to the Partnership and its limited  partners may
come into conflict with the duties of the General  Partner to AIMCO, as its sole
stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The  investment  property is recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's   investment  property.  These  factors  include  changes  in  the
national,  regional and local economic  climate;  local  conditions,  such as an
oversupply  of  multifamily   properties;   competition   from  other  available
multifamily  property  owners and changes in market  rental  rates.  Any adverse
changes in these factors could cause an impairment in the Partnership's assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized  monthly as it is earned and
the Partnership  fully reserves all  outstanding  balances over thirty days. The
Partnership will offer rental concessions during  particularly slow months or in
response  to  heavy  competition  from  other  similar  complexes  in the  area.
Concessions are charged to income as incurred.

ITEM 3.  Controls and Procedures

The principal  executive officer and principal  financial officer of the General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and  principal  financial  officer,  respectively,  have,  within 90 days of the
filing  date  of this  quarterly  report,  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the
Partnership's  disclosure  controls and  procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)) and have determined that such disclosure controls
and  procedures  are  adequate.  There have been no  significant  changes in the
Partnership's  internal  controls or in other  factors that could  significantly
affect the  Partnership's  internal  controls since the date of evaluation.  The
Partnership does not believe any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses
exist in the Partnership's internal controls. Accordingly, no corrective actions
have been taken.

                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order granting in part the demurrer.  The Court has dismissed without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General Partner and affiliated  defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002,
the Court held a hearing on plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took
the matter under submission after further briefing, as ordered by the court, was
submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002, the Court entered an order vacating
the trial date of  January  13,  2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and  discovery
cut-off dates) and stayed the case in its entirety  through  November 7, 2002 so
that the parties could have an opportunity to discuss settlement. On October 30,
2002, the court entered an order  extending the stay in effect  through  January
10, 2003.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action  described below. On April
4, 2003, the Court preliminarily approved the settlement and scheduled a hearing
on final approval for June 2, 2003.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of  settlement)  and up to $ 1 million toward the cost
of independent  appraisals of the Partnerships'  properties by a Court appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make a tender
offer to purchase all of the partnership  interests in the  Partnerships  within
one year of final approval,  if it is granted,  and to provide partners with the
independent  appraisals at the time of these  tenders.  The proposed  settlement
also  provides  for the  limitation  of the  allowable  costs  which the General
Partner or its affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships in connection with this
litigation  and  imposes  limits  on the  class  counsel  fees and costs in this
litigation.  On April 11,  2003,  notice was  distributed  to  limited  partners
providing the details of the proposed settlement.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike the  complaint.  On December  11, 2001,  the court heard  argument on the
motions and took the matters under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court
served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the Heller
complaint  as a violation  of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On
March 27, 2002, the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking the
complaint.  Before completing briefing on the appeal, the parties stayed further
proceedings  in the  appeal  pending  the  Court's  review  of the  terms of the
proposed settlement described above.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs,  associated with these cases will be material
to the Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a) Exhibits:

            3.1   Certificate of Limited Partnership,  incorporated by reference
                  to the Registration  Statement of Registrant filed October 22,
                  1984, as amended to date.

            3.2   Agreement of Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to
                  the  Registration  Statement of  Registrant  filed October 22,
                  1984, as amended to date.

            99    Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as Adopted
                  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

            b) Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended March 31, 2003.



                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI


                                    By:   CONCAP EQUITIES, INC.
                                          General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Accounting Officer


                                  Date:   May 14, 2003

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Patrick J. Foye, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated  Capital
Properties VI;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;


      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


      a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: May 14, 2003




                                    /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Patrick J. Foye
                                    Executive Vice President of ConCap Equities,
                                    Inc., equivalent  of  the  chief  executive
                                    officer of the Partnership

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Paul J. McAuliffe, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated  Capital
Properties VI;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;


      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


      a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: May 14, 2003

                                    /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                    Officer of ConCap Equities, Inc., equivalent
                                    of the chief financial officer of the
                                    Partnership


Exhibit 99


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated  Capital
Properties VI (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  Patrick J. Foye, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of
the Partnership, and Paul J. McAuliffe, as the equivalent of the chief financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                     /s/Patrick J. Foye
                               Name: Patrick J. Foye
                               Date: May 14, 2003


                                     /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                               Name: Paul J. McAuliffe
                               Date: May 14, 2003



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.