alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 74769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30026]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Secretary


List of Countries Requiring Cooperation with an International 
Boycott

    In accordance with section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of 
countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation 
with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    On the basis of the best information currently available to the 
Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may 
require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott 
(within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986).
    Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab 
Emirates, Yemen, Republic of Iraq is not included in this list, but its 
status with respect to future lists remains under review by the 
Department of the Treasury.

    Dated: November 23, 2010.
Manal Corwin,
International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2010-30026 Filed 11-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
#### Ercelle H. Moore, Plaintiff, v. Rosco C. Washington et al., Respondents. Alvin V. Moore, Administrator of the Estate of Ercelle H. Moore, Deceased, Proposed Substitute Party Plaintiff-Appellant.

-Order entered November 24, 1969 denying the motion to substitute the administrator of the estate of Ercelle Harmon Moore as party plaintiff in place of Ercelle Harmon Moore, deceased, and granting the cross motion of the defendants to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed on the law, the motion granted and the *904cross motion dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. As the Special Term originally noted, an action in libel and slander does not abate upon the death of the plaintiff, except insofar as punitive damages are sought. (EPTL 11-3.2.) On reargument, the court found that the compensatory damages allegedly sustained by the plaintiff, the loss of salary and emoluments, did not flow from the tortious acts of the defendants. Upholding a claim of qualified privilege on the defendants’ part, the court concluded that the loss of the deceased’s postion as Imperial Commandress was dictated by the by-laws of the organization which directed her suspension pending the hearing and determination of the charges against her. Accordingly, the cross motion to dismiss the complaint was granted. It had previously been established as the law of the case, however, that the papers raised triable issues on the question of express malice or actual ill-will affecting the defense of privilege. ('See *Shapiro*v. *Health Ins. Flam,*7 27 Y 2d 56, 61.) In any event, until substitution of the plaintiff’s administrator, no proceeding could be taken in the action by the defendants so that Special Term lacked jurisdiction to pass upon the cross motion. *(Warren*v. *Cole,*29 A D 2d 988, affd. 26 27 Y 2d 803; *Thompson*v. *Raymond ICramer, Inc.,*23 A D 2d 746; *Dooley*v. *Gray,*22 A D 2d 791; *Ruder-man*v. *Feffer,*10 A D 2d 704.) Hence, the cross motion should have been dismissed. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., Markewich, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donald Kello, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Guinness Exploration Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:				       (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended May 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.*/s/ Donald Kello*Donald Kello					Chief Executive Officer				Chief Financial Officer				August 23, 2007				A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

****

----
<PAGE>
   Amendment dated as of September 3, 1997, to Master Note Agreement, 
dated June 10, 1985, as amended (the "Agreement") by and between 
Nordstrom Credit, Inc. and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as 
custodian, fiduciary and advisor.

   WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend the Agreement so as to 
change the rate at which interest under the Agreement is computed;

   Now, Therefore, the parties hereto agree as follows:

   1.  The third paragraph of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety 
and the following is inserted in lieu thereof:

The principal amount of each such note shall be specified from time to 
time in the manner hereinafter provided.  Each such note shall be dated 
as of the date of its issue and shall bear interest from said date on 
the principal amount from time to time outstanding, payable on the first 
day of each month, at a rate per annum for each day equal to the One 
Month LIBOR Rate (as hereinafter defined) for such day, less fourteen 
(14) basis points, or, if such day is not a business day, the rate for 
the immediately preceding business day.  For the purposes of this 
Agreement the term One Month LIBOR Rate shall mean the one month USD 
LIBOR Rate (British Bankers Association) quoted on page 3750 of 
Telerate.  If the One Month LIBOR Rate is not available for any business 
day, the applicable rate for such day shall be the one month LIBOR rate 
for such day as determined by you, in a commercially reasonable manner, 
on the basis of quotations received by you from three U.S. money center 
banks of recognized standing.  For purposes of computing interest, 
principal amounts loaned hereunder shall be deemed to be outstanding on 
the date loaned but not on the date repaid.

   2.  Except as hereby expressly amended, the Agreement and all the 
terms, conditions and provisions thereof shall continue in full force 
and effect.

   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto set their names as at the 
date first above written.


MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY               NORDSTROM CREDIT, INC.
OF NEW YORK


By:   /s/ Robert R. Johnson                 By:    /s/John C. Walgamott
      ------------------------                     ---------------------

Title: Vice President                       Title: President
      ------------------------                     ---------------------
Exhibit 32(ii)

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Form 10-K of National Bankshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, I, David K. Skeens, Treasurer of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:

 

(1)  such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securties Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.

 

 

 

| /s/ DAVID K. SKEENS                                                                     |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| David K. Skeens

Treasurer and 

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer) |
23.804 Contract provision and clauses.

(a) Except for contracts for supplies that will be delivered outside the United States and its outlying

areas, or contracts for services that will be performed outside the United States and its outlying

areas, insert the following clauses:

(1) 52.223-11, Ozone-Depleting Substances and High Global Warming Potential Hydrofluorocarbons,

in solicitations and contracts for–

(i) Refrigeration equipment (in product or service code (PSC) 4110);

(ii) Air conditioning equipment (PSC 4120);

(iii) Clean agent fire suppression systems/equipment (e.g., installed room flooding systems, portable

fire extinguishers, aircraft/tactical vehicle fire/explosion suppression systems) (in PSC 4210);

(iv) Bulk refrigerants and fire suppressants (in PSC 6830);

(v) Solvents, dusters, freezing compounds, mold release agents, and any other miscellaneous

chemical specialty that may contain ozone-depleting substances or high global warming potential

hydrofluorocarbons (in PSC 6850);

(vi) Corrosion prevention compounds, foam sealants, aerosol mold release agents, and any other

preservative or sealing compound that may contain ozone-depleting substances or high global

warming potential hydrofluorocarbons (in PSC 8030);

(vii) Fluorocarbon lubricants (primarily aerosols) (in PSC 9150); and

(viii) Any other manufactured end products that may contain or be manufactured with ozonedepleting substances.

(2) 52.223-12, Maintenance, Service, Repair, or Disposal of Refrigeration Equipment and Air

Conditioners, in solicitations and contracts that include the maintenance, service, repair, or disposal

of–

(i) Refrigeration equipment, such as refrigerators, chillers, or freezers; or

(ii) Air conditioners, including air conditioning systems in motor vehicles.

(3) 52.223-20, Aerosols, in solicitations and contracts–

(i) For products that may contain high global warming potential hydrofluorocarbons as a propellant,

or as a solvent; or

(ii) That involve maintenance or repair of electronic or mechanical devices.

(4) 52.223-21, Foams, in solicitations and contracts for–

(i) Products that may contain high global warming potential hydrofluorocarbons or refrigerant

blends containing hydrofluorocarbons as a foam blowing agent, such as building foam insulation or

appliance foam insulation; or
(ii) Construction of buildings or facilities.

(b) The provision at 52.223-22, Public Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Reduction GoalsRepresentation, is required only when 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is included in the

solicitation (see 52.204-8, Annual Representations and Certifications).

Parent topic: Subpart 23.8 - Ozone-Depleting Substances and Greenhouse Gases
#### § 3565.17 Demonstration programs.

To test ways to expand the availability or enhance the effectiveness of the guarantee program, or for similar purposes, the Agency may, from time to time, propose demonstration programs that use loan guarantees or interest credit. Toward this end, the Agency may enter into special partnerships with lenders, financial intermediaries, or others to carry out one or more elements of a demonstration program. Demonstration programs will be publicized by notices in the Federal Register.
#### § 51.1264 Unclassified.

“Unclassified” consists of pears which have not been classified in accordance with any of the foregoing grades. The term “unclassified” is not a grade within the meaning of these standards, but is provided as a designation to show that no grade has been applied to the lot.
Pioneer Railcorp Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries


Alabama Railroad Co., incorporated in Iowa
Alabama & Florida Railway Co., incorporated in Iowa
Decatur Junction Railway Co., incorporated in Iowa
Fort Smith Railroad Co., incorporated in Iowa
Minnesota Central Railroad Co., incorporated in Iowa
Mississippi Central Railroad Co., incorporated in Mississippi
Pioneer Air, Inc., incorporated in Iowa
Pioneer Railroad Equipment Co., Ltd., incorporated in Iowa
Pioneer Railroad Services, Inc., incorporated in Iowa
Vandalia Railroad Company, incorporated in Illinois
Wabash & Western Railway Co., incorporated in Iowa
West Michigan Railroad Co., Incorporated in Iowa
[874 NE2d 722, 842 NYS2d 758]

#### In the Matter of Simone D., Appellant. Kathleen Iverson, Respondent.

Argued May 31, 2007;

decided June 27, 2007

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Mental Hygiene Legal Service, Second Judicial Department,*Mineola *(Kim L. Darrow, Sidney Hirschfeld*and *Dennis B. Feld*of counsel), for appellant.

*Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General,*New York City *(Patrick J. Walsh, Barbara D. Underwood*and *Michael S. Belohlavek*of counsel), for respondent.

*New York Lawyers for the Public Interest,*New York City *(John A. Gresham*of counsel), for Disability Advocates, Inc. and others, amici curiae.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed without costs.

*829Petitioner, the acting director of Creedmoor Psychiatric Center, sought permission to administer electroconvulsive therapy to a patient at the center without the patient’s consent. Supreme Court granted the application, and the Appellate Division affirmed, two Justices dissenting. The patient appeals to us as of right, pursuant to CPLR 5601 (a).

The sole ground for the patient’s appeal is that Supreme Court improperly limited the patient’s cross-examination of the State’s psychiatric expert witness. We agree with the Appellate Division majority that, when the cross-examination is viewed as a whole, the record shows no abuse of discretion. While specific evidentiary rulings can be debated, the patient’s attorney was allowed to and did make clear to the court all the claimed weaknesses in the psychiatrist’s testimony. The record does not show that Supreme Court excluded any evidence material to the only disputed issue: whether the proposed treatment was narrowly tailored to give substantive effect to the patient’s liberty interest, taking into consideration all relevant circumstances *(Rivers v Katz,*67 NY2d 485, 497-498 [1986]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
#### Barbara J. Howard, Respondent, v. Sidney Howard, Appellant.

Order entered November 15, 1968, awarding temporary alimony, counsel fee and other relief, unanimously modified on the law and the facts to the extent of striking the fifth decretal paragraph awarding an interim counsel fee, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that counsel fee was not requested and plaintiff’s counsel expressly disavowed any application for such relief at that time. Concur—' Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tilzer, McGivem and McNally, JJ.
#### § 51.1268 Condition after storage or transit.

Decay, scald, or other deterioration which may have developed on pears after they have been in storage or transit shall be considered as affecting condition and not grade.
#### Pamela Deyo, Respondent-Appellant, v City of Auburn et al., Respondents, and Samuel Testa, Appellant-Respondent. David C. Deyo, Respondent-Appellant, v City of Auburn et al., Respondents, and Alan Wilson, Appellant-Respondent.

— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. (See *Fahey v County of Ontario,*44 NY2d 934; *Sindle v New York City Tr. Auth.,*33 NY2d 293.) (Appeals from order of Cayuga Supreme Court— amend complaint and answer.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DANIEL BENITEZ,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:02-cv-00019-MP

ROBERT WALLIS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 36, Order in Lieu of Mandate by the United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, as to Doc. 14, Notice of Appeal filed by Daniel

Benitez, dismissing this appeal as moot and vacating the district court's order. This matter was

remanded with instructions to the district court to dismiss the petition as moot.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The Petitioner for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as MOOT. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of July, 2005.

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 5:02-cv-00019-MP Document 37 Filed 07/19/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      31.1


**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      David
      LaDuke, certify that:





1. I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sputnik, Inc.;





2. Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I
      am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
      business issuer and have:





(a) designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) evaluated
      the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) disclosed
      in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
      reporting.





5. I
      have
      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit
      committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing
      the equivalent functions):





(a) all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial information; and




(b) any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
      financial reporting.





Date: October 26, 2007
            /s/ David LaDukeName:David
              LaDukeTitle:Principal
              Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
              Officer
#### §§ 3550.212-3550.249 [Reserved]
#### The State ex rel. Groves, Appellee, *v.*Community Action Program; Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Groves v. Community Action Program*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 357.]

(No. 97-2271

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*Richard L. Williger,*for appellee.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Jonathan A. Good,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State ex rel. Russell v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 516, 696 N.E.2d 1069.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          16,259
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  192,992
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     43,309
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               253,940
<PP&E>                                          28,925
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 269,297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          254,113
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,754,585
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,866,263)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   269,267
<SALES>                                        391,675
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               393,057
<CGS>                                          342,389
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  342,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,375
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,707)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (34,707)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,707)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.070)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.070)
        

</TABLE>