Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices 73035 

variable pressure capability, low kV and 

Schottky field emission source, 

secondary and backscatter detection, 

and a temperature control Peltier stage. 

Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There 

are no instruments of the same general 

category manufactured in the United 

States. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: October 27, 

2010. 

Docket Number: 10–066. Applicant: 

Vanderbilt University, 2201 West End 

Avenue, Nashville, TN 37235. 

Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: JEOL Limited, Japan. 

Intended Use: The instrument will be 

used to study cement-based composites, 

environmental materials, and geological 

samples for their microstructure, phase 

characteristics, and interfacial 

processes. This instrument can image 

and analyze samples that are completely 

wet while carrying the humidity and 

pressure in the specimen chamber. This 

instrument also offers a WetSTEM 

detector for imaging completely wet 

samples in both bright field (BF) and 

dark field (DF) modes without special 

sample handling/encapsulation. 

Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There 

are no instruments of the same general 

category manufactured in the United 

States. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: October 27, 

2010. 

Dated: November 22, 2010. 

Gregory Campbell, 

Acting Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement 

Office. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29967 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–405–803] 

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From 

Finland; Notice of Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On August 9, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published in the Federal 

Register the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on purified 

carboxymethylcellulose from Finland. 

See Purified Carboxymethylcellulose 

from Finland; Notice of Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 47788 

(August 9, 2010) (Preliminary Results). 

We gave interested parties an 

opportunity to comment on the 

Preliminary Results and received no 

comments. 

DATES: Effective Date: November 29, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tyler Weinhold, or Robert James, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–1121 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 9, 2010, the Department 

published the preliminary results of 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order covering 

purified carboxymethylcellulose from 

Finland. See Preliminary Results. The 

parties subject to this review are CP 

Kelco Oy and CP Kelco U.S., Inc. 

(collectively, CP Kelco). The petitioner 

in this proceeding is the Aqualon 

Company, a division of Hercules 

Incorporated (Petitioner). 

In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department stated that interested parties 

may submit case briefs within 30 days 

of publication of the Preliminary Results 

and rebuttal briefs within five days after 

the due date for filing case briefs. See 

Preliminary Results at 47794. No 

interested party submitted a case or 

rebuttal brief. Accordingly, we made no 

changes for the final results. See 

Memorandum from Tyler Weinhold, to 

the File, ‘‘Analysis of Data Submitted by 

CP Kelco Oy and CP Kelco U.S. Inc. 

(collectively, CP Kelco) in the 

Preliminary Results of the 2008–2009 

Administrative Review of Purified 

Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from 

Finland,’’ dated August 2, 2010; 

Memorandum from Tyler Weinhold, to 

the File, ‘‘Analysis of Data Submitted by 

CP Kelco Oy and CP Kelco U.S. Inc. 

(collectively, CP Kelco) in the 2008– 

2009 Administrative Review of Purified 

Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from 

Finland,’’ and Memorandum from 

Sheikh M. Hannan, to the File, ‘‘Cost of 

Production and Constructed Value 

Calculation Adjustments for the 

Preliminary Results—CP Kelco Oy.’’ 

Period of Review 

The period of review (POR) is July 1, 

2008, through June 30, 2009. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order is all purified 

carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), 

sometimes also referred to as purified 

sodium CMC, polyanionic cellulose, or 

cellulose gum, which is a white to offwhite, non-toxic, odorless, 

biodegradable powder, comprising 

sodium CMC that has been refined and 

purified to a minimum assay of 90 

percent. Purified CMC does not include 

unpurified or crude CMC, CMC 

Fluidized Polymer Suspensions, and 

CMC that is cross-linked through heat 

treatment. Purified CMC is CMC that 

has undergone one or more purification 

operations which, at a minimum, reduce 

the remaining salt and other by-product 

portion of the product to less than ten 

percent. The merchandise subject to this 

order is classified in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States at 

subheading 3912.31.00. This tariff 

classification is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes; 

however, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Final Results of Review 

The Department has determined that 

the following margin exists for the 

period July 1, 2008, through June 30, 

2009: 

Manufacturer 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

(percentage) 

CP Kelco Oy ......................... 6.10 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to these final results, the 

Department has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. The Department 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

for CP Kelco to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of these final results. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we 

calculated importer-specific (or 

customer-specific) ad valorem duty 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of the dumping 

margins calculated for the examined 

sales to the total entered value of those 

same sales. We will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review if any importer-specific (or 

customer-specific) assessment rate 

calculated in the final results of this 

review are above de minimis. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties). This clarification 

will apply to entries of subject 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

73036 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by CP Kelco for which CP Kelco did not 

know the merchandise was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 6.65 percent allothers rate from the LTFV investigation 

if there is no company-specific rate for 

an intermediary involved in the 

transaction. See Notice of Antidumping 

Duty Orders: Purified 

Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland, 

Mexico, the Netherlands and Sweden, 

70 FR 39734 (July 11, 2005). See 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties for a 

full discussion of this clarification. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Furthermore, the following cash 

deposit requirements will be effective 

upon publication of these final results 

for all shipments of purified 

carboxymethylcellulose from Finland 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act): (1) The cash 

deposit rate for CP Kelco will be the rate 

established in the final results of review; 

(2) if the exporter is not a firm covered 

in this review or the less-than-fair-value 

(LTFV) investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; and (3) if neither the 

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm 

covered in this or any previous review 

conducted by the Department, the cash 

deposit rate will be the all-others rate 

from the LTFV investigation. Id. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this POR. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: November 15, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29961 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) has received requests 

to conduct administrative reviews of 

various antidumping and countervailing 

duty orders and findings with October 

anniversary dates. In accordance with 

the Department’s regulations, we are 

initiating those administrative reviews. 

DATES: Effective Date: November 29, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Unit, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–4697. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department has received timely 

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), for administrative reviews of 

various antidumping and countervailing 

duty orders and findings with October 

anniversary dates. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

various types of information, 

certifications, or comments or actions by 

the Department discussed below refer to 

the number of calendar days from the 

applicable starting date. 

Notice of No Sales 

Under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the 

Department may rescind a review where 

there are no exports, sales, or entries of 

subject merchandise during the 

respective period of review (‘‘POR’’) 

listed below. If a producer or exporter 

named in this notice of initiation had no 

exports, sales, or entries during the 

POR, it must notify the Department 

within 60 days of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. The 

Department will consider rescinding the 

review only if the producer or exporter, 

as appropriate, submits a properly filed 

and timely statement certifying that it 

had no exports, sales, or entries of 

subject merchandise during the period 

of review. All submissions must be 

made in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303 and are subject to verification 

in accordance with section 782(i) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’). Six copies of the submission 

should be submitted to the Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Room 1870, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy of each request 

must be served on every party on the 

Department’s service list. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event the Department limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews, 

the Department intends to select 

respondents based on U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. 

imports during the period of review 

(‘‘POR’’). We intend to release the CBP 

data under Administrative Protective 

Order (‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an 

APO within seven days of publication of 

this initiation notice and to make our 

decision regarding respondent selection 

within 21 days of publication of this 

Federal Register notice. The 

Department invites comments regarding 

the CBP data and respondent selection 

within five days of placement of the 

CBP data on the record of the applicable 

review. 

Separate Rates 

In proceedings involving non-market 

economy (‘‘NME’’) countries, the 

Department begins with a rebuttable 

presumption that all companies within 

the country are subject to government 

control and, thus, should be assigned a 

single antidumping duty deposit rate. It 

is the Department’s policy to assign all 

exporters of merchandise subject to an 

administrative review in an NME 

country this single rate unless an 

exporter can demonstrate that it is 

sufficiently independent so as to be 

entitled to a separate rate. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES