alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

I, Scott W. Absher, certify that: 

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EntreMetrix Corporation; 

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: 

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant‘s internal control over financial reporting.
**Exhibit 17.1** 

**Charles S. Cohen						8902 Loch Lomond Ct.						Houston, TX  77096						713-240-2464**

Mr. Phil Scott				CFO SurgiCare, Inc.				12727 Kimberley Lane #200				Houston, TX  77024

October 29, 2003

Dear Mr. Scott: 

As you are aware I have not been an active member of the SurgiCare, Inc. board of directors since September of 2002. I cannot in good conscious continue to be an inactive member of the board of directors. 

Please accept this letter as my official resignation from the SurgiCare, Inc. board of directors, effective immediately. 

Of course, it goes without saying; if I can ever be of any assistance to SurgiCare, please feel free to contact me. 

Sincerely, 

***/s/ Charles S. Cohen***Charles S. Cohen
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 27, 2017

t0920 

# Order

Clerk September 27, 2017

155994

In re WILLIAMS, Minors. SC: 155994

COA: 335932

Macomb CC Family Div:

2012

- 000291

- NA

2012

- 000292

- NA

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 8, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall

address whether the respon dent

- father was entitled, under the Michigan Indian Family

Preservation Act, MCL 712B.1 et seq ., to withdraw his consent to the termination of his

parental rights for the purpose of adoption at any time before entry of a final order of

adoption. MCL 712B. 13(3). The time allowed for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for

each side. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

The Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Inter

- Tribal Council of

Michigan, Inc., United Tribes of Michigan, National Indian Child Welfare Association,

Indigenous Law & Policy Center of the Michigan State University College of Law, and

the Children’s Law, Family Law, and American Indian Law Sections of the State Bar of

Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in

the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission

to file briefs amicus curiae.
Exhibit
          32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO
 18
          U.S.C.
          SECTION 1350,
 AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Each
          of
          the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Dolce
          Ventures, Inc. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
          as
          adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
          to the
          best of his or her knowledge:
 
 (1)
          The
          Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
          30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
          The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated: November
                  14,
                  2006/s/ Yu-Chuan LiuYu-Chuan
                  LiuChief Executive Officer
 /s/ Chen FangChen
                  Fang
  
 A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
          to
          Dolce Ventures, Inc. and will be retained by Dolce Ventures, Inc. and furnished
          to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
          request.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:97-cr-00011-MMP

WELDON WASHINGTON, JR.,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on the disposition of the Final Hearing on the Revocation

of Supervised Release as to Weldon Washington, Jr., which was continued by prior order to

allow the United State Probation Office to find a suitable in-patient treatment facility. The

Probation Office has completed its investigation, and this matter is now ready for final

disposition. Accordingly, the disposition hearing on the revocation of supervised release is

hereby set for Thursday, August 2, 2007, at 1:30 p.m.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of July, 2007

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:97-cr-00011-MP-AK Document 467 Filed 07/27/07 Page 1 of 1
p120169.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 12-0169 Focus Ready Draft 2/16/2012

ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ JD PV (kg/yr):

SAT (concerns) (02/07/2012):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Ecotox Related Cases: Analogs: Migration to groundwater: PMN slow; Deg Pdt rapid PBT rating: P3B2T2 PMN: Health - 1, Eco - 1, P3B1T1 // Deg PDt: Health - 2, Eco - 3, P3B2T2 Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation Low Concern Page 1p120169.eng

Eco: 3 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 12-0169

Page 2p120169.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 12-0169

Page 3p120169.eng

Page 5p120169.eng

Page 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            5185
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      139
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5362
<PP&E>                                           26425
<DEPRECIATION>                                    9980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   21924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1149
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       20775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     21924
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5327
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  4782
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2849)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2849)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2849)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (16.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (16.54)
        

</TABLE>
CONSULTING AGREEMENT

This agreement is by and between Natural Venture, a British Virgin Island
Corporation (Natural) and Atlantic Capital Ventures, Inc, a Nevada Corporation
(Atlantic), for consulting services to be rendered by Natural Venture on behalf
of Capital Ventures for a period of one year commencing December 1, 2000 and
ending November 30, 2001.

Whereas Natural desires to provide certain consulting services to Atlantic and
Atlantic wishes Natural to provide those services, Atlantic hereby agrees to
issue Natural a total 100,000 shares of unregistered common stock at a value of
$.05 per share for a total value of $5,000 USD.

In return for a period of 12 months commencing December 1, 2000 and ending on
November 30, 2001, Natural Venture will use its best efforts to refer potential
business partners, strategic alliances or candidates for possible merger or
acquisition with Atlantic for the purpose of furthering their business
objectives.

Further, Atlantic agrees to hold Natural harmless for any consequences of any
business transactions consummated by Atlantic with any person's or companies
that Natural may introduce to it.

Further, Atlantic and Natural mutually agree that all transactions and
introductions shall be done in full compliance with all applicable local and
federal securities laws as dictated by the Securities Act of 1933 and the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Agreed this 23rd day of November 2000

/s/ Nicolet Roulet
--------------------------------------
Natural Venture



Agreed this 23 day of November 2000




/s/  Christopher Miles
--------------------------------------
Christopher Miles, President
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION IX
 

75 Hawthorne Street
 

San Francisco, CA 94105
 

Mr. Herbert J. Verville NOV 1 7 2011 

Lhoist North America, Nelson Plant 

P.O. Box 370 

Peach Springs, Arizona 86434 

Dear Mr. Verville: 

I am writing to inform you that EPA Region 9 is developing a partial Regional Haze Federal 

Implementation Plan (FIP) for the state of Arizona. The purpose of the Regional Haze FIP is to improve 

visibility in national parks and wilderness areas in Arizona and surrounding states as required by Section 

169A of the Clean Air Act (Act). During the process of developing the Arizona Regional Haze State 

Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted to EPA on March 2, 2011, the Arizona Department of 

Environmental Quality (ADEQ) determined that the Nelson Lime Plant was exempt from Best Available 

Retrofit Technology (BART) requirements. We believe ADEQ's analysis leads to a different conclusion, 

and have made a preliminary determination that this facility is subject to BART requirements under 

section 169A(b)(2)(A) of the Act, and EPA's implementing regulations and BART guidelines at 40 CFR 

Part 51, Subpart P and Appendix Y. Accordingly, we will perform a five-factor BART analysis to 

determine whether any additional emissions controls are warranted. 

As we begin our FIP analysis, we have requested that ADEQ provide us with all background materials, 

including BART analyses, that were performed by them or the affected facilities. We may also request 

that you provide us with additional information on the Nelson Lime Plant as our analysis proceeds. In 

the meantime, we welcome the submission of any additional, relevant information that you would like to 

provide to our office. 

EPA has entered into a consent decree that requires the Agency to propose approval of Arizona's 

Regional Haze SIP and/or propose a Regional Haze FIP that meets the requirements of the Act and 

EPA's regional haze regulations by May 15,2012. The consent decree also requires the Agency to take 

final action on the Arizona Regional Haze SIP and/or FIP by November 15,2012. EPA Region 9 will 

hold public hearings in Arizona and solicit public comments on a proposed Arizona Regional Haze FIP 

in the months preceding the November 15 deadline. 

If you would like to submit any additional information or analysis, we request that you send it by 

February 29,2012. Any modeling of the facility should use the regulatory versions of CALPUFF 

(version 5.8, level 070623), CALMET (version 5.8, level 070623), and CALPOST (version 6.221). You 

may wish to prepare a modeling protocol and consult with EPA Region 9 about the preparation of 

modeling inputs in accord with EPA guidance. Submit any information to: 

Thomas Webb 

US EPA (AIR-2) 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 
You can also reach Thomas at webb.thornas@epa.gov or by phone at 415-947-4139. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please contact Thomas Webb or 

myself (mckaughan.colle n@epa.gov, 520-498-0118). 

~.~~ Colleen McKaughan 

Associate Director, Air Division 

cc: Henry R. Darwin, ADEQ 

Eric Massey, ADEQ
-

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

From: Don Craig [dcraig@westelcom.com] 

" "'Sent'~l .' -"" :; Satuxday, February 13, 2010 3:30 PM ";' ?:: :;To:£"~: . . Devany, Dennis (OST) 

~ubject: Keep Cape Air as EAS provider 

.. .. _.~ ~~,P~V~IlY, 

As a resident of Clinton County, NY, and a frequent flyer, I urge you to continue to approve Cape Air as the Essential 

Air Service provider at Plattsburgh International Airport (PSG). Cape Air has proven itself reliable and has been accepted 

by our community. They provide regular and frequent service at affordable prices. . 

The bigger planes, higher rates and less frequent service proposed by Colgan are not an improvement. Colgan also 

has a questionable safety record due to cutting corners. 

Cape Air is my choice for service and continued economic development through Plattsburgh International Airport. 

Thank you for your consideration. . 

Respectfully 

Don Craig 


Saranac, NY 


1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 4:97cr36-RH/WCS

SANDRA LURRY,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO MOTION

FOR EARLY TERMINATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

The government shall file by May 31, 2005, a response to defendant Sandra

Lurry’s motion for early termination of supervised release. If known, the response

shall include a statement of the position of the assigned probation officer—that is,

whether the officer supports, opposes, or takes no position on the motion. Ms.

Lurry may file a reply in support of the motion within 21 days after service of the

government’s response.

SO ORDERED this 9th day of May, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:97-cr-00036-RH-WCS Document 723 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case Nos.: 3:98cr49/RV

 3:11cv240/RV/EMT

ERNEST SOLOMON HICKS

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated December 22, 2011 (doc. 182). The parties have been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. The Government’s motion to dismiss (doc. 179) is GRANTED.

3. The motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(doc. 170) is DISMISSED. 

4. No certificate of appealability shall issue.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of January, 2012.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 255 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 256
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 255

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2013

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend certain definitions contained in the Provo River Project 
Transfer Act for purposes of clarifying certain property descriptions, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFYING CERTAIN PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS IN PROVO RIVER 
              PROJECT TRANSFER ACT.

    (a) Pleasant Grove Property.--Section 2(4)(A) of the Provo River 
Project Transfer Act (Public Law 108-382; 118 Stat. 2212) is amended by 
striking ``of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``on which the 
parcel is conveyed under section 3(a)(2)''.
    (b) Provo Reservoir Canal.--Section 2(5) of the Provo River Project 
Transfer Act (Public Law 108-382; 118 Stat. 2212) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``canal, and any associated land, rights-
        of-way, and facilities'' and inserting ``water conveyance 
        facility historically known as the Provo Reservoir Canal and 
        all associated bridges, fixtures, structures, facilities, 
        lands, interests in land, and rights-of-way held,'';
            (2) by inserting ``and forebay'' after ``Diversion Dam'';
            (3) by inserting ``near the Jordan Narrows to the point 
        where water is discharged to the Welby-Jacob Canal and the Utah 
        Lake Distributing Canal'' after ``Penstock''; and
            (4) by striking ``of enactment of this Act'' and inserting 
        ``on which the Provo Reservoir Canal is conveyed under section 
        3(a)(1)''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 256

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 255

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend certain definitions contained in the Provo River Project 
Transfer Act for purposes of clarifying certain property descriptions, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 9, 2013

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
#### § 48.3 Director.

The Director shall perform, for and under the supervision of the Secretary and the Deputy Administrator, such duties as the Secretary or the Deputy Administrator may require in enforcing the provisions of the Act and the regulations issued thereunder.
#### § 4279.44 Access to records.

The lender must permit representatives of the Agency (or other agencies of the United States) to inspect and make copies of any records of the lender pertaining to Agency guaranteed loans during regular office hours of the lender or at any other time upon agreement between the lender and the Agency. In addition, the lender must cooperate fully with Agency oversight and monitoring of all lenders involved in any manner with any guarantee to ensure compliance with this subpart, subpart B of this part, and subpart B of part 4287 of this chapter. Such oversight and monitoring will include, but is not limited to, reviewing lender records and meeting with lenders in accordance with subpart B of part 4287 of this chapter.
#### § 3570.91 Regulations.

Grants under this part will be in accordance with 2 CFR part 200 as adopted by USDA through 2 CFR part 400, as applicable, and any conflicts between those parts and this part will be resolved in favor of applicable 2 CFR part 200 as adopted by USDA through 2 CFR part 400.

[79 FR 76013, Dec. 19, 2014]
32.006 Reduction or suspension of contract

payments upon finding of fraud.

32.006-1 General.

32.006-2 Definition.

32.006-3 Responsibilities.

32.006-4 Procedures.

32.006-5 Reporting.

Parent topic: Part 32 - Contract Financing