alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE UF MAINE.

+^1 Crr,^ OFFICE oF T'HL GUVERNOR I S'TATE HOUSE STATIC)N

. ^^..^yqct^^ ^ AUGUSTA, MAINF. 04 3 3 3-000 1 Paul R. LePage

GOVLIINOR
July 23, 2013

Mr. Robert Perciasepe Acting Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street, SW Washington, DC 20460 Dear Mr. Perciasepe: 

### On June 11, 2013, Maine enacted legislation calling for the use of reformulated gasoline (RFG) in York, Cumberland, Sagadahoc, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Knox and Lincoln counties beginning May 1, 2014. Pursuant to section 211(k)(6)(B) of the Clean Air Act, I hereby formally request that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency extend the requirement for the sale of RFG to these counties 

### beginning on this date. Implementation of the RFG program in Maine's southern counties will provide additional nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds emission reductions that will facilitate Maine's efforts to maintain the federal ground level ozone standards while also reducing emissions of toxic compounds such as benzene. In addition to providing air quality benefits, RFG will remove the need for a"boutique" fuel, thereby improving stability in the marketplace by reducing costs to consumers and simplifying gasoline supply and distribution efforts in Maine. I am also asking that the existing 7.8 Reid Vapor Pressure fuel requirements for these counties be removed from the Maine State Implementation Plan (SIP), and be replaced with the new RFG requirement. Maine plans to subsequently amend its Chapter 119 Motor Vehicle Fuel Volatility Limit rule and submit it as a SIP revision upon the granting of this request Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to the successful implementation of the RFG program in southern Maine. If you have any questions regarding this requdst, please contact Ms. Patricia W. Aho, Commissioner of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection at 207 287-2812.

Sincerely,


### Paul R, LePage Governor 

# ^•«^

PRiN I)T ON RI?<, Cl YJ, (',, P1:1t PHONE: (207) 287-3531 (Voice) TTY USERS CALL 711 FAX: (207) 287•1034 www.mainr.gov
Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JACOB RYAN FOUST,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5649-MCR-EMT

TOBY JAMES DOWN, 

Defendant.

______________________/

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on June 15, 

2021. ECF No. 14. Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 

14, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

Case 3:20-cv-05649-MCR-EMT Document 15 Filed 07/27/21 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No. 3:20cv5649-MCR-EMT

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court.

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of July 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05649-MCR-EMT Document 15 Filed 07/27/21 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No. 3:20cv5649-MCR-EMT

Case 3:20-cv-05649-MCR-EMT Document 15 Filed 07/27/21 Page 3 of 3
§ 4284.921 Ineligible Applicants. ( a ) Consistent with the Departmental Regulations, an Applicant is ineligible if the Applicant is debarred or suspended or is otherwise excluded from, or ineligible for participation in, Federal assistance programs under Executive Order 12549, “Debarment and Suspension.”
( b ) An Applicant will be considered ineligible for a grant due to an outstanding judgment obtained by the U.S. in a Federal Court (other than U.S. Tax Court), is delinquent on the payment of Federal income taxes, or is delinquent on Federal debt.
§ 4287.180 Termination of guarantee. The Loan Note Guarantee will terminate under any of the following conditions: ( a ) Upon full payment of the guaranteed loan;
( b ) Upon full payment of any loss obligation; or
( c ) Upon written notice from the lender to the Agency that the guarantee will terminate 30 days after the date of notice, provided that the lender holds all of the guaranteed portion and the Loan Note Guarantee is returned to the Agency to be canceled.
Exhibit 23.01









INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement Nos. 333-23175 and 033-61139 of Adelphia Communications Corporation on
Form S-3 of our report dated June 11, 1997 for Adelphia Communications
Corporation and subsidiaries, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Adelphia Communications Corporation for the year ended March 31, 1997. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement Nos. 333-23175 and 033-61139 of Adelphia Communications Corporation on
Form S-3 of our report dated March 26, 1997 for Olympus Communications, L.P. and
subsidiaires, contained in Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No.
333-19327 of Olympus Communications, L.P. and Olympus Capital Corporation on
Form S-4.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
June 19, 1997


                                       84
#### § 4287.303 Exception authority.

The Administrator may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture, make an exception, on a case-by-case basis, to any requirement or provision of this subpart that is not inconsistent with any authorizing statute or applicable law, if the Administrator determines that application of the requirement or provision would adversely affect the Federal government's interest.
9.102 Applicability.

(a) This subpart applies to all proposed contracts with any prospective contractor that is located-

(1) In the United States or its outlying areas; or

(2) Elsewhere, unless application of the subpart would be inconsistent with the laws or customs

where the contractor is located.

(b) This subpart does not apply to proposed contracts with-

(1) Foreign, State, or local governments;

(2) Other U.S. Government agencies or their instrumentalities; or

(3) Agencies for people who are blind or severely disabled (see subpart 8.7).

Parent topic: Subpart 9.1 - Responsible Prospective Contractors
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-18-00391-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 393rd District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-5268-393

Before Pittman, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

DARVETTE CHETAYE MCLEMORE, Appellant

V.

SEAN FITZGERALD MCLEMORE, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On November 30, 2018, and December 11, 2018, we notified appellant, in 

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal 

unless appellant paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3. Appellant

has not done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellant has not complied with a procedural requirement and the 

Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015,1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 10, 2019

 1

See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases 

in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).
#### In the Matter of William Unterman, Individually and on Behalf of His Wife, Louise Unterman, and Another, Petitioner, v Noah Weinberg, as Commissioner of the Rockland County Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

— Proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to review a determination of the respondent State Commissioner of Social Services, dated November 15, 1978 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency to discontinue the grant of aid to petitioner, his wife and one minor dependent child. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determination of the State commissioner was supported by substantial evidence. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
§ 4279.119 Loan guarantee limits. ( a ) *Loan amount.* The total amount of B&I loans to one borrower (including the guaranteed and unguaranteed portions, the outstanding principal and interest balance of any existing B&I guaranteed loans, and the new loan request) must not exceed $10 million, except as outlined in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section. In addition to the borrower loan limit, there is a guarantor loan limit of $50 million. ( 1 ) The Administrator may, at the Administrator's discretion, grant an exception to the $10 million limit for loans of $25 million or less under the following circumstances: ( i ) The project to be financed is a high-priority project as defined in § 4279.2. Priority points will be awarded in accordance with the criteria contained in § 4279.166;
( ii ) The lender must document to the satisfaction of the Agency that the loan will not be made and the project will not be completed if the guaranteed loan is not approved; and
( iii ) The percentage of guarantee will not exceed 60 percent. No exception to this requirement will be approved under paragraph (b) of this section for loans exceeding $10 million.
( 2 ) The Secretary, whose authority may not be redelegated, may approve guaranteed loans in excess of $25 million, at the Secretary's discretion, for rural cooperative organizations that process value-added agricultural commodities in accordance with § 4279.113(j)(1).
( b ) *Percentage of guarantee.* The percentage of guarantee, up to the maximum allowed by this section, is a matter of negotiation between the lender and the Agency. The maximum percentage of guarantee is 80 percent for loans of $5 million or less, 70 percent for loans between $5 and $10 million, and 60 percent for loans exceeding $10 million. For subsequent guaranteed loans, the maximum percentage of guarantee will be based on the cumulative amount of outstanding principal and interest of any existing B&I guaranteed loans and the new loan request. Notwithstanding the preceding, the Administrator may, at the Administrator's discretion, grant an exception allowing guarantees of up to 90 percent on loans of $5 million or less if the conditions of either paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) are met. Each fiscal year, the Agency will establish a limit on the maximum portion of guarantee authority available for that fiscal year that may be used to guarantee loans with an increased percentage of guarantee. The Agency will publish a notice announcing this limit in the Federal Register. ( 1 ) The project to be financed is a high-priority project as defined in § 4279.2. Priority points will be awarded in accordance with the criteria contained in § 4279.166; or
( 2 ) The lender documents, to the satisfaction of the Agency, that the loan will not be made and the project will not be completed due to the bank's legal or regulatory lending limit if the higher percentage of guarantee is not approved.
|   | Exhibit      32.2 |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Bruce G.      Blackey |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          45,738
<SECURITIES>                                   118,779
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               204,212
<PP&E>                                       3,038,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 705,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,570,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,669,734
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,570,012
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               701,246
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,835,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             248,057
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (206,428)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,588,616)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

vs. Case No. 5:19cr73-TKW/MJF

DEMETRIUS WHITSETT

_________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed.

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Count I of the Indictment. After

cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects

mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary,

and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing

each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea

of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence

imposed accordingly.

Dated: December 6, 2019

/s/ Michael J. Frank 

MICHAEL J. FRANK

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

twenty four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that

may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. If a party fails to

object to the magistrate judge's findings or recommendations as to any particular claim

or issue contained in a report and recommendation, that party waives the right to

challenge on appeal the district court's order based on the unobjected-to factual and

legal conclusions. See 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Case No.: 5:19cr73-TKW/MJF
#### § 3560.625 Maintaining the physical asset.

On-farm labor housing must meet state and local building and occupancy codes.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2306 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2306

   To amend the National Organ Transplant Act to clarify that kidney 
paired donation and kidney list donation do not involve the transfer of 
               a human organ for valuable consideration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2006

     Mr. Levin (for himself, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Dorgan, and Mr. Bond) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the National Organ Transplant Act to clarify that kidney 
paired donation and kidney list donation do not involve the transfer of 
               a human organ for valuable consideration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Living Kidney Organ Donation 
Clarification Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE NATIONAL ORGAN TRANSPLANT ACT.

    Section 301(a) of the National Organ Transplant Act (42 U.S.C. 
274e(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``For purposes 
of this section, kidney paired donation and kidney list donation shall 
not be considered to involve the transfer of a human organ for valuable 
consideration.''.
                                 <all>
```
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daniel Martinez-Atkinson, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Liberty Energy Corp.
      for the year ended July 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Liberty Energy Corp.                                                           

Dated: November 9, 2011

| | /s/
      Daniel Martinez-Atkinson                     
| | -------------------------------------------------------
| | Daniel Martinez-Atkinson                               
| | Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
      and
| | Director                                               
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal             
| | Accounting Officer)                                    
| | Liberty Energy Corp.                                   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Liberty Energy
Corp. and will be retained by Liberty Energy Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### §§ 4287.359-4287.368 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            3033
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      186
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3219
<PP&E>                                           11966
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5289)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    9932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1081
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        8851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      9932
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  8221
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   868
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   850
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4559
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4559
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4559
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    23.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    23.58


</TABLE>
EX-3.7
        CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                      Certificate of Amendment to
                       Articles of Incorporation
                     For Nevada Profit Corporation
      (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)

1.  Name of corporation: Justwebit.com, Inc.

2.  The articles have been amended as follows (provide article
numbers, if available):

     Article I.  Name of Corporation: Synthetic Turf Corporation of
     America.

3.  The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the
corporation entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the
voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be
required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may be
required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation have voted
in favor of the amendment is: 56,100,000 *

4.  Officer Signature (Required)


/s/Gary Borglund


* If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or
any relative or other right given to any class or series of
outstanding shares, then the amendment must be approved by the vote,
in addition to the affirmative vote otherwise required, of the holders
of shares representing a majority of the voting power of each class or
series affected by the amendment regardless of limitations or
restrictions on the voting power thereof.

IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and remit
the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.