alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS AND NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: #'S 2 AND 4, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             327
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,187
<INVENTORY>                                     51,089
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,789
<PP&E>                                          41,330
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,180
<BONDS>                                         42,817
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,233
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,250
<SALES>                                        134,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               145,918
<CGS>                                          113,970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  113,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,777
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,146
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    887
<INCOME-TAX>                                       150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                737
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       737
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21


</TABLE>
§ 3201.127 Epoxy systems. ( a ) *Definition.* Epoxy systems are two-component systems that are epoxy-based and are used as coatings, adhesives, surface fillers, and composite matrices.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 23 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased epoxy systems. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased epoxy systems.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]
Pages 2-3 removed Internal deliberative information*Internal deliberative information*


Pages 6-9 *Confidential Statements of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*






















































































Pages 96-97 *Confidential Statements of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5



       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997

<CASH>                                         196
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               196
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          516,704
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       177,833
<OTHER-SE>                                     (694,341)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (516,508)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (142,773)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             52,295
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (195,068)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (195,068)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.007)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.007)
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Marshall R. and another, Children Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Broome County Department of Social Services, Appellant; Cheryl S. et al., Respondents.

— Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County, entered January 16, 1979, which dismissed a child abuse and neglect petition. The issue here involves the ruling of the Family Court that testimony given by an interpreter for the deaf, concerning a statement of a six-year-old' deaf child, should not be admitted in evidence at the hearing (cf. Family Ct Act, § 1046, subd [a], par [vi]). The court found that the statement was given by the child to the interpreter after the filing of the petition. The best interests of the child are far more important than some technical objection which, on this record, appears to have little substance. The testimony of the interpreter should have been admitted, and then it would become the duty of the court to weigh and evaluate such testimony in the light of the circumstances under which it was given. In so deciding, we do not pass on the issue as to whether the children were abused or neglected. Order reversed, on the law, without costs, and a new trial directed in accordance herewith. Greenblott, J.P., Staley, Jr., Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
22.610 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.222-20, Contracts for Materials, Supplies,

Articles, and Equipment, in solicitations and contracts covered by the statute (see 22.603, 22.604,

and 22.605).

Parent topic: Subpart 22.6 - Contracts for Materials, Supplies, Articles, and Equipment
24.301 Privacy training.

(a) Contractors are responsible for ensuring that initial privacy training, and annual privacy training

thereafter, is completed by contractor employees who-

(1) Have access to a system of records;

(2) Create, collect, use, process, store, maintain, disseminate, disclose, dispose, or otherwise handle

personally identifiable information on behalf of the agency; or

(3) Design, develop, maintain, or operate a system of records (see FAR subpart 24.1 and 39.105).

(b) Privacy training shall address the key elements necessary for ensuring the safeguarding of

personally identifiable information or a system of records. The training shall be role-based, provide

foundational as well as more advanced levels of training, and have measures in place to test the

knowledge level of users. At a minimum, the privacy training shall cover-

(1) The provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), including penalties for violations of the

Act;

(2) The appropriate handling and safeguarding of personally identifiable information;

(3) The authorized and official use of a system of records or any other personally identifiable

information;

(4) The restriction on the use of unauthorized equipment to create, collect, use, process, store,

maintain, disseminate, disclose, dispose, or otherwise access personally identifiable information;

(5) The prohibition against the unauthorized use of a system of records or unauthorized disclosure,

access, handling, or use of personally identifiable information; and

(6) Procedures to be followed in the event of a suspected or confirmed breach of a system of records

or unauthorized disclosure, access, handling, or use of personally identifiable information (see Office

of Management and Budget guidance for Preparing for and Responding to a Breach of Personally

Identifiable Information).

(c) The contractor may provide its own training or use the training of another agency unless the

contracting agency specifies that only its agency-provided training is acceptable (see 24.302(b)).

(d) The contractor is required to maintain and, upon request, to provide documentation of

completion of privacy training for all applicable employees.

(e) No contractor employee shall be permitted to have or retain access to a system of records,

create, collect, use, process, store, maintain, disseminate, disclose, or dispose, or otherwise handle

personally identifiable information, or design, develop, maintain, or operate a system of records,

unless the employee has completed privacy training that, at a minimum, addresses the elements in

paragraph (b) of this section.

Parent topic: Subpart 24.3 - Privacy Training
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:94cr3012 LAC

RAY ANTHONY WILLIAMS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on JULY 17, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT 

MATTER JURISDICTION, CONSTRUCTIVE AMENDMENT AND “STRUCTURAL 

ERROR” 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on6/30/08 Doc.# 801

RESPONSES:

BY GOVERNMENT on 7/16/08 Doc.# 808

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 22nd day of

July, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Untimely and without merit. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:94-cr-03012-LC-MD Document 813 Filed 07/22/08 Page 1 of 1
# L_2021186EN.01003301.xml

| 27.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 186/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 186/33

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/810 of 20 May 2021 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2021/808 as regards transitional provisions for certain substances listed in Annex II to Decision 2002/657/EC

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 180 of 21 May 2021
  )

The title is replaced with the following:

‘Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/810 of 20 May 2021 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/808 as regards transitional provisions for certain substances listed in Annex II to Decision 2002/657/EC’.

---
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER JON PERGROSSI,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-184-AW-GRJ

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This is one of the many frivolous pro se cases Christopher Jon Pergrossi has 

recently filed in this court. I have considered the magistrate judge’s omnibus order 

to show cause and report and recommendation. ECF No. 4. No objections were 

filed.* I agree with the magistrate judge that the action is frivolous and has wasted 

court resources. On the issue of sanctions, the judge in the first-filed case found it to 

be a close call but did not impose sanctions. See No. 1:20-cv-181-MW-GRJ, ECF 

No. 7. I will likewise not impose sanctions at this time.

The clerk will enter judgment that says, “This case is DISMISSED without 

leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).” The clerk will close the file.

* In another of his cases, Pergrossi filed an objection to the omnibus Report 

and Recommendation. See No. 1:20-cv-181-MW-GRJ, ECF No. 6. Although he did 

not file that objection (or any objection) in this case, I have nonetheless considered 

de novo the issues raised in that objection. 

Case 1:20-cv-00184-AW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 10/05/20 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED on October 5, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00184-AW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 10/05/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2447 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2447

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the White Rocks National Recreation Area in the State of 
  Vermont as the ``Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation 
                                Area''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT T. STAFFORD WHITE ROCKS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA .

    (a) Redesignation.--The White Rocks National Recreation Area in the 
State of Vermont, as established by section 202 of the Vermont 
Wilderness Act of 1984 (16 U.S.C. 460nn-1), is redesignated as the 
``Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the recreation area 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area.

            Passed the Senate March 16 (legislative day, March 15), 
      2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2447

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To redesignate the White Rocks National Recreation Area in the State of 
  Vermont as the ``Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation 
                                Area''.
```
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 1 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 2 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 3 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 4 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 5 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 6 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 7 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 8 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 9 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 10 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 11 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 12 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 13 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 14 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 15 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 16 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 17 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 18 of 19
Case 4:02-cv-00202-WS-WCS Document 1 Filed 06/06/02 Page 19 of 19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,464,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              124,033,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,629,000
<INVENTORY>                                 61,942,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           197,379,000
<PP&E>                                     122,849,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,963,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             497,234,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       95,740,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 33,008,000
<COMMON>                                       330,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 215,051,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               497,234,000
<SALES>                                    570,035,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           570,035,000
<CGS>                                      517,894,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              517,894,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            81,844,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,995,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (38,962,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (4,555,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (34,407,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 200,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (41,307,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.99)
        

</TABLE>
# L_2021057EN.01008301.xml

| 18.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 57/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 57/83

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/247

of 11 February 2021

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Liptovské droby’ (PGI)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovakia’s application to register the name ‘Liptovské droby’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovakia’s application to register the name ‘Liptovské droby’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Liptovské droby’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Liptovské droby’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Liptovské droby’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.8. Other products listed in Annex I to the Treaty (spices etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 February 2021.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 321, 29.9.2020, p. 58.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201800010

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

RON E. HILL

Hospital Corpsman Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Libretto, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, 3d Marine Division, 

Okinawa, Japan.

Staff Judge Advocate Recommendation: Major Adam J. Workman, 

USMC.

For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Lee C. Kindlon, USMCR.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 26 April 2018

_________________________

Before HUTCHISON, FULTON, and KOVAC, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
             RALI SERIES 2006-QS11 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
STAFF REPORT: INITIAL STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR

PROPOSED RULEMAKING

PROPOSED REGULATION FOR IN

- USE ON

- ROAD DIESEL VEHICLES

Mobile Source Control Division

Heavy

- Duty Diesel In

- Use Strategies Branch

October 2008Table III

- 1: Vehicles Potentially Affected by the Proposed Regulation, by Fleet

Type

- 2008

Fleet/Population Type Number of Vehicles Percent of

Vehicles

**Instate Total**  **379,168 40%** 

Instate MHD 210,760 22%

Instate HHD 141,964 15%

Motor Coach & School buses 26,443 3%

**Interstate Total**  **561,499 60%** 

Interstate MHD 8,896 1%

Interstate HHD (CA Registered) 60,263 6%

Interstate HHD (non

- CA Registered) 492,340 52%

**Total 940,667**  **100%**