alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                 $ 7,256,092
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            2,871,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        10,289,860
<PP&E>                                  11,743,834
<DEPRECIATION>                           9,345,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          12,696,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    2,390,717
<BONDS>                                    825,811
<COMMON>                                13,849,658
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                              (4,373,383)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            12,696,536
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                           4,136,223
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             4,136,223
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .89


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the annual Report of TDI Holding Corp.  (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Blair Zykan, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Blair Zykan
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Blair Zykan, CEO & CFO

Dated:  7/15/05

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# 31.102 Fixed-price contracts.

The applicable subparts of part  31*shall* be used in the *pricing* of fixed-price contracts, subcontracts, and modifications to contracts and subcontracts whenever (a) cost analysis is performed, or (b)a fixed-price *contract clause* requires the determination or negotiation of costs. However, application of cost principles to fixed-price contracts and subcontracts *shall* not be construed as a requirement to negotiate agreements on individual elements of cost in arriving at agreement on the total price. The final price accepted by the parties reflects agreement only on the total price. Further, notwithstanding the mandatory use of cost principles, the objective will continue to be to negotiate prices that are fair and reasonable, cost and other factors considered.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 31.1 - Applicability
Exhibit 32(ii)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Form 10-K of National Bankshares, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2003, I, J. Robert Buchanan, Treasurer of National Bankshares,
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief that:

      (1) such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies
         with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securties Act of
         1934; and

      (2) the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended
         December 31, 2003, fairly presents in all material respects, the
         financial condition and results of operations of National Bankshares,
         Inc.




 /s/ J. ROBERT BUCHANAN
-----------------------------
J. Robert Buchanan
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)

                                       60
# L_2014079EN.01000201.xml

| 18.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 79/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 79/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 28 January 2014

on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius

(2014/146/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43, in conjunction with point (a) of Article 218(6) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Union negotiated with the Republic of Mauritius a Fisheries Partnership Agreement providing EU vessels with fishing opportunities in the waters over which the Republic of Mauritius exercises its sovereignty or jurisdiction. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Union negotiated with the Republic of Mauritius a Fisheries Partnership Agreement providing EU vessels with fishing opportunities in the waters over which the Republic of Mauritius exercises its sovereignty or jurisdiction.

| (2) | The Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius (‘the Fisheries Partnership Agreement’) was signed in accordance with Council Decision 2012/670/EU of 9 October 2012 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius (1). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius (‘the Fisheries Partnership Agreement’) was signed in accordance with Council Decision 2012/670/EU of 9 October 2012 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius (1).

| (3) | The Fisheries Partnership Agreement should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Fisheries Partnership Agreement should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.

The text of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council shall give, on behalf of the Union, the notifications provided for in Article 17 of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement (2).

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 28 January 2014.

For the Council

The President

G. STOURNARAS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 300, 30.10.2012, p. 34.

1

(2)  The date of entry into force of the Agreement will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union by the General Secretariat of the Council.

2

Official Journal of the European Union

---
#### § 46.23 Evidence of dumping.

Reasonable cause for destroying any produce exists when the commodity has no commercial value or when it is dumped by order of a local health officer or other authorized official or when the shipper has specifically consented to such disposition. The term “commercial value” means any value that a commodity may have for any purpose that can be ascertained by the exercise of due diligence without unreasonable expense or loss of time. When produce is being handled for or on behalf of another person, proof as to the quantities of produce destroyed or dumped in excess of five percent of the shipment shall be provided by procuring an official certificate showing that the produce has no commercial value from any person authorized by the Department to inspect fruits and vegetables. Where such inspection service is not available certification may be obtained from (a) any health officer or food inspector of any State, county, parish, city or municipality or of the District of Columbia; (b) any established commercial agency or service making inspections for the fruit and vegetable industry; or (c) when no inspector or health officer designated above is available consideration will be given to other evidence such as inspection and certification made by any two persons having no financial interest in the produce involved or in the business of any person financially interested therein, and who are unrelated by blood or marriage to any such financially interested person, and who, at the time of the inspection and certification, and for a period of at least one year immediately prior thereto, have been engaged in the handling of the same general kind or class of produce with respect to which the inspections and certification are to be made. Any certificate issued by any persons designated in paragraph (c) of this section shall include a statement that each of them possesses the requisite qualifications. Any such certificate shall properly identify the produce by showing the commodity, lot number, brand or principal identifying marks on the containers, quantity dumped, name and address of shipper, name and address of applicant, condition of the produce, time, place, and date of inspection and a statement that the produce possesses no commercial value.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Solera
Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned chief executive officer and chief
financial officer of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Tony Aquila         |  |  |  | /s/ Jack Pearlstein    
|Tony Aquila             |  |  |  | Jack Pearlstein        
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 6, 2008  |  |  |  | Date: November 6, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WILLTON KEN HERBERT,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-25-AW-GRJ

J K IRBY, ALACHUA

COUNTY CLERK,

Respondent.

 /

O R D E R

I have considered the magistrate judge’s April 7, 2020 Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 7. There have been no objections. I have determined the 

Report and Recommendation should be adopted, and it is incorporated into this 

order. The clerk will enter a judgment saying, “The Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus is dismissed as premature and pursuant to the Younger abstention doctrine.”

A certificate of appealability is denied. The clerk will close the file.

SO ORDERED on May 10, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00025-AW-GRJ Document 8 Filed 05/10/20 Page 1 of 1
32.501-3 Contract price.

(a) For the purpose of making progress payments and determining the limitation on progress

payments, the contract price shall be as follows:

(1) Under firm-fixed price contracts, the contract price is the current amount fixed by the contract

plus the not-to-exceed amount for any unpriced modifications.

(2) If the contract is redeterminable or subject to economic price adjustment, the contract price is

the initial price until modified.

(3) Under a fixed-price incentive contract, the contract price is the target price plus the not-toexceed amount of unpriced modifications. However, if the contractor’s properly incurred costs

exceed the target price, the contracting officer may provisionally increase the price up to the ceiling

or maximum price.

(4) Under a letter contract, the contract price is the maximum amount obligated by the contract as

modified.

(5) Under an unpriced order issued against a basic ordering agreement, the contract price is the

maximum amount obligated by the order, as modified.

(6) Any portion of the contract specifically providing for reimbursement of costs only shall be

excluded from the contract price.

(b) The contracting officer shall not make progress payments or increase the contract price beyond

the funds obligated under the contract, as amended.

Parent topic: 32.501 General.
§ 51.2336 Tolerances. In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, the following tolerances by count, shall be permitted in any lot: ( a ) U.S. Fancy and U.S. No. 1. ( 1 ) For defects at shipping point.[2] 8 percent for fruit which fail to meet the requirements of the specified grade: *Provided,* That included in this amount not more than 4 percent shall be allowed for defects causing serious damage, including in this latter amount not more than 1 percent for fruit affected by internal breakdown or decay.
( 2 ) For defects en route or at destination. 12 percent for fruit which fail to meet the requirements of the specified grade: *Provided,* That included in this amount not more than the following percentages shall be allowed for defects: ( i ) 8 percent for permanent defects;
( ii ) 6 percent for defects causing serious damage, including therein not more than 4 percent for serious damage by permanent defects and not more than 2 percent for fruit affected by internal breakdown or decay.
( b ) U.S. No. 2. ( 1 ) For defects at shipping point.2 8 percent for fruit which fail to meet the requirements of this grade: *Provided,* That included in this amoung not more than 4 percent shall be allowed for sunscald, insects, internal breakdown or decay, including in this latter amount not more than 1 percent for fruit affected by internal breakdown or decay.
( 2 ) For defects en route or at destination. 12 percent for fruit which fail to meet the requirements of this grade: *Provided,* That included in this amount not more than the following percentages shall be allowed for defects: ( i ) 8 percent for permanent defects including therein not more than 4 percent for sunscald, or insects; and,
( ii ) 2 percent for internal breakdown or decay.
Footnotes -
51.2336
[2] Shipping point, as used in these standards, means the point of origin of the shipment in the producing area or at port of loading for ship stores or overseas shipment, or, in the case of shipments from outside the continental United States, the port of entry into the United States.
# L_2021174EN.01000101.xml

| 18.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 174/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 174/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/794

of 11 May 2021

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Nagykun rizs’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Nagykun rizs’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Nagykun rizs’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Nagykun rizs’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Nagykun rizs’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Nagykun rizs’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 May 2021.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 27, 25.1.2021, p. 26.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
<page>

Exhibit 99.2

NORDSTROM CREDIT, INC.

13531 EAST CALEY

ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO  80111

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, Michael G. Koppel, the Vice President and Treasurer of Nordstrom
Credit, Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended April 30, 2003 (the "Report") filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission:

-  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

-  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
   all material respects, the financial condition and results
   of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael G. Koppel
-----------------------
                                          Michael G. Koppel
                                          Vice President and Treasurer
                                          June 9, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Nordstrom, Inc. and will be retained by Nordstrom,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
27.203-2 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.227-10, Filing of Patent Applications-Classified Subject Matter, in all

classified solicitations and contracts and in all solicitations and contracts where the nature of the

work reasonably might result in a patent application containing classified subject matter.

Parent topic: 27.203 Security requirements for patent applications containing classified subject

matter.
17.200 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for the use of option solicitation provisions and

contract clauses. Except as provided in agency regulations, this subpart does not apply to contracts

for (a) services involving the construction, alteration, or repair (including dredging, excavating, and

painting) of buildings, bridges, roads, or other kinds of real property; (b) architect-engineer services;

and (c) research and development services. However, it does not preclude the use of options in those

contracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 17.2 - Options
T.C. Memo. 2001-40 UNITED STATES TAX COURT GENNARO AND PATRICIA LABATO, Petitioners v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 4781-99. Filed February 23, 2001. 

### This opinion was withdrawn by order dated July 10, 2001.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 21-0640 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ANTHONY CHINCHOLL, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

ir f L.) 

OCT 2 5 2022 

Bowen Greenwood 

CI,--rk of Suprerne Court 

State of IVIontana ORDER 

ORIGINAL 

Pursuant to Appellant Anthony Chincholl's motion for extension to of time to file 

his response to the Anders Brief and Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and good cause 

appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant has until November 28, 2022, to file his 

response to the Anders Brief and Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. 

DATED this ZSd day of October, 2022. 

For the Court, 

Chief Justice 

10/25/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0640
§ 4287.380 Termination of guarantee. The Loan Note Guarantee will terminate under any of the following conditions: ( a ) Upon full payment of the guaranteed loan;
( b ) Upon full payment of any loss obligation; or
( c ) Upon written notice from the Lender to the Agency that the guarantee will terminate 30 days after the date of notice, provided that the Lender owns the entire guaranteed interest in the loan and the Loan Note Guarantee is returned to the Agency to be canceled.
#### § 4279.280 Changes in Borrowers.

Any changes in Borrower ownership or organization prior to the issuance of the Loan Note Guarantee must meet the eligibility requirements of the Program and be approved by the Agency.