alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 36.3 Public notification of grade standards action. After developing a standardization proposal, the Agency will publish a notice in the Federal Register describing new or changes to existing standards or to suspend or terminate existing standards. AMS will simultaneously issue a news release about these actions. AMS will also distribute copies of the full text of the proposals to anyone requesting a copy or to anyone the Agency believes may be interested, including other Federal, State, or local government agencies, and on the Internet. For other than minor editorial or technical changes, the notice will provide at least 60 days for interested parties to submit comments to the Agency. ( a ) All comments received within the comment period will be part of the public record maintained by the Agency, will be available to the public for review, and will be considered by the Agency before final action is taken on the proposal. ( 1 ) Based on the comments received, the Agency's knowledge of standards, grading, marketing, and other technical factors, and any other relevant information AMS will decide whether the proposed actions should be implemented.
( 2 ) If AMS concludes that the actions as proposed or with minor modifications should be adopted, AMS will publish a description of the changes or actions in a Federal Register notice. The Agency, through the appropriate AMS Divisions, will make the grade standards and related information available in printed form and electronic media.
( 3 ) If the Agency determines that proposed changes are not warranted, or otherwise are not in the public interest, the Agency will either publish in the Federal Register a notice withdrawing the proposal, or will revise the proposal and again seek public input.
( b ) [Reserved]
### Depth to the Juan de Fuca slab beneath the Cascadia subduction margin– A 3-D model for sorting earthquakes

By: Patricia A. McCrory**J. Luke BlairDavid H. OppenheimerStephen R. Walter

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds91

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Spatial Data:  **Spatial Data**                            (html)
- Version History:  **Version History**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William A. Ganci, Appellant.

Order of the County -Court, Suffolk County, dated May 27, 1968, affirmed. No opinion. Appellant’s notice of appeal is amended to show May 27, 1968 as the date of the order appealed from ('Code Crim. Pro., § 524-e). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 

31.1 

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, Scott W. Absher, certify that: 

> 
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of EntreMetrixCorporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2005.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the quarterly report;and 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theCompany as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report. 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such		disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,		to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including		its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within		those entities, particularly during the period in which the quarterly		report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls		and procedures and presented in the quarterly report our conclusions		about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of		the end of the period covered by the quarterly report based on such		evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in the quarterly report any change in the Company's		internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the		Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is		reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control		over financial reporting; 

> 
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theCompany's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions); 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of		internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to		record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified		for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;		and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or		other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal		controls over financial reporting. 

| Dated: May 17, 2005 |  By: /s/ Scott W. Absher               |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|           |        Scott W. Absher, President                                                   |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Adelphia Communications Corporation ("Adelphia") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vanessa A. Wittman, Chief Financial Officer of Adelphia, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/VANESSA A. WITTMANVanessa A. Wittman Chief Financial
Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|December 23, 2004                                               |  | 

---
Case 4:00-cv-00121-WS-WCS Document 28 Filed 01/18/01 Page 1 of 1
#### §§ 4280.440-4280.442 [Reserved]
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 27 Filed 05/03/21 Page 1 of 1
32.803 Policies.

(a) Any assignment of claims that has been made under the Act to any type of financing institution

listed in 32.802(b) may thereafter be further assigned and reassigned to any such institution if the

conditions in 32.802(d) and (e) continue to be met.

(b) A contract may prohibit the assignment of claims if the agency determines the prohibition to be

in the Government’s interest.

(c) Under a requirements or indefinite quantity type contract that authorizes ordering and payment

by multiple Government activities, amounts due for individual orders for $1,000 or more may be

assigned.

(d) Any contract of a designated agency (see FAR 32.801), except a contract under which full

payment has been made, may include a no-setoff commitment only when a determination of need is

made by the head of the agency, in accordance with the Presidential delegation of authority dated

October 3,1995, and after such determination has been published in the Federal Register. The

Presidential delegation makes such determinations of need subject to further guidance issued by the

Office of Federal Procurement Policy. The following guidance has been provided:

Use of the no-setoff provision may be appropriate to facilitate the national defense; in the event of a

national emergency or natural disaster; or when the use of the no-setoff provision may facilitate

private financing of contract performance. However, in the event an offeror is significantly indebted

to the United States, the contracting officer should consider whether the inclusion of the no-setoff

commitment in a particular contract is in the best interests of the United States. In such an event,

the contracting officer should consult with the Government officer(s) responsible for collecting the

debt(s).

(e) When an assigned contract does not include a no-setoff commitment, the Government may apply

against payments to the assignee any liability of the contractor to the Government arising

independently of the assigned contract if the liability existed at the time notice of the assignment

was received even though that liability had not yet matured so as to be due and payable.

Parent topic: Subpart 32.8 - Assignment of Claims
3.807 Civil penalties.       Agencies shall impose and collect civil penalties pursuant to the provisions of the Program Fraud and Civil Remedies Act,31 U.S.C.3803 (except subsection(c)), 3804-3808, and 3812, insofar as the provisions therein are not inconsistent with the requirements of this subpart.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3.8 - Limitations on the Payment of Funds to Influence Federal Transactions
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 99.6



CONTACTS:  Duane Kimble                          Joel Pomerantz
           Baldwin Piano                         The Dilenschneider Group
           (513) 754-4647                        (212) 922-0900


                   SLACK DEMAND AND HIGHER INVENTORIES PROMPT
             BALDWIN PIANO TO ELIMINATE 67 JOBS AT ITS TRUMANN PLANT


       MASON, OHIO, January 11, 2001 -- Responding to slack consumer demand,
continuing Asian imports and higher than normal piano inventories at its
manufacturing facility in Trumann, Arkansas, the Baldwin Piano & Organ Company
announced today that it was forced to permanently layoff 67 of its 331 workers.
The layoffs at the company's plant at 900 Highway 463 in Trumann are effective
January 11, 2001.

       Karen Hendricks, chairman, president, and CEO of Baldwin Piano, said: "We
deeply regret that economic conditions have made it necessary to layoff any of
our workers. We deferred this decision as long as possible and kept the number
of layoffs as small as we could. It is never easy to say goodbye to loyal,
dedicated employees. But current economic reality prompted us to take action now
in an effort to preserve as many remaining jobs as possible."

       Consistent with the company's long-standing policy, Ms. Hendricks said
that Baldwin would do what it could to help displaced workers find new
employment.

       Baldwin Piano & Organ Company, the maker of America's best selling
pianos, has marketed keyboard musical products for over 140 years.

                                      # # #

       "Safe Harbor" statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform
       Act of 1995: This release contains forward looking statements that are
       subject to risk and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the
       impact of competitive products and pricing, product demand and market
       acceptance, reliance on key strategic alliances, fluctuations in
       operating results and other risks detailed from time to time in the
       company's filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
14.000 Scope of part.       This part prescribes-                                       (a)                    						            The basic requirements of contracting for supplies and services (including construction) by sealed bidding;                                          (b)                    						            The information to be included in the solicitation (invitation for bids);                                          (c)                    						            Procedures concerning the submission of bids;                                          (d)                    						            Requirements for opening and evaluating bids and awarding contracts; and                                          (e)                    						            Procedures for two-step sealed bidding.    **Parent topic:** Part 14 - Sealed Bidding
§ 5001.117 Ineligible WWD projects The following are ineligible projects for the WWD programs only: ( a ) That portion of a project normally provided by a business or industrial user, such as wastewater pretreatment.
( b ) Provided the existing borrower has the capacity to provide adequate service to their service territory, guaranteed loan funds may not be used to take away customers or service areas of existing USDA WWD Program direct or guaranteed loan borrowers. The requirements and limitations of 7 U.S.C. 1926(b) only apply to this section.
( c ) Projects where the borrower acts to circumvent the regulations provided in this subpart, causing the borrower or project being eligible when, previously, the borrower or project was ineligible.
( d ) Projects involving the purchase of existing facilities in which the transaction's purpose is to primarily retire the debt of the seller in order for the seller to continue to use the facility at a lower cost.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOHN ASHLES PERRETTE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20cv228-TKW-MJF

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et 

al.,

Defendants.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 8). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed based on 

Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee and failure to comply with court orders.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the case file.

Case 5:20-cv-00228-TKW-MJF Document 9 Filed 01/05/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00228-TKW-MJF Document 9 Filed 01/05/21 Page 2 of 2
31.205-37 Royalties and other costs for use of patents.       (a) 						            Royalties on a patent or amortization of the cost of purchasing a patent or patent rights necessary for the proper performance of the contract and applicable to contract products or processes are allowable unless-                                                         (1) 								                The Government has a license or the right to a free use of the patent;                                                            (2) 								                The patent has been adjudicated to be invalid, or has been administratively determined to be invalid;                                                            (3) 								                The patent is considered to be unenforceable; or                                                            (4) 								                The patent is expired.                                                                             (b) 						            Care should be exercised in determining reasonableness when the royalties may have been arrived at as a result of less-than-arm’s-length bargaining; e.g.,royalties-                                                         (1) 								                Paid to persons, including corporations, affiliated with the contractor;                                                            (2) 								                Paid to unaffiliated parties, including corporations, under an agreement entered into in contemplation that a Government contract would be awarded; or                                                            (3) 								                Paid under an agreement entered into after the contract award.                                                                             (c) 						            In any case involving a patent formerly owned by the contractor, the royalty amount allowed should not exceed the cost which would have been allowed had the contractor retained title.                                          (d) 						            See 31.109 regarding advance agreements.    **Parent topic:** 31.205 Selected costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           83537
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1505006
<ALLOWANCES>                                    117512
<INVENTORY>                                    1295246
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3128813
<PP&E>                                         2275717
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1099808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5483723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1691538
<BONDS>                                         383542
<COMMON>                                         76546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3332097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5483723
<SALES>                                        7728824
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7728824
<CGS>                                          4307755
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7444480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 14342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (14836)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              70,724
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 270002
<INCOME-TAX>                                     25250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             244752
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    244752
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
§ 3201.61 Animal repellents. ( a ) *Definition.* Products used to aid in deterring animals that cause destruction to plants and/or property.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 79 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 23, 2012, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased animal repellents. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased animal repellents.
[76 FR 43817, July 22, 2011]
US. Deportment of T r ansportation Federal Aviation Administration



# AUG 11 2014 Mr. Brian Anderson L-3 Communications 4240 International Parkway/Suite 100 Carrolton, TX 75007 Dear Mr. Anderson: 800 Independe nce Ave . . S W . Wash i ngton. D .C 2059 1

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

### § § 91.9(b)(2), 9 1. 9(c), 91.203(a) and (b) ofTitle 14, Code ofFeder al Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

### Why We Can Not Pr ocess Your Request We entered your July 14, 2014 exemption request on behalfofL-3 Communicat ions into the public docket (No. FAA-20 14-0480), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of§ 11.81 (copy enclosed) . For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following : • The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole. • Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

### What You Should Do Ifyou want us to p r ocess your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that 

### § 1 1 .63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

### IfWe Do Not Hear From You If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time , you may call (202) 267-9677. Sincerely, Michelle Ferritto Acting Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division Enclosure 2
31.107 Contracts with State, local, and

federally recognized Indian tribal

governments.

(a) subpart 31.6 provides principles and standards for determining costs applicable to contracts

with State, local, and federally recognized Indian tribal governments. They provide the basis for a

uniform approach to the problem of determining costs and to promote efficiency and better

relationships between State, local, and federally recognized Indian tribal governments, and Federal

Government entities. They apply to all programs that involve contracts with State, local, and

federally recognized Indian tribal governments, except contracts with-

(1) Publicly financed educational institutions subject to subpart 31.3; or

(2) Publicly owned hospitals and other providers of medical care subject to requirements

promulgated by the sponsoring Government agencies.

(b) The Office of Management and Budget will approve any other exceptions in particular cases

when adequate justification is presented.

Parent topic: Subpart 31.1 - Applicability
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

 

East West Bank

135 N. Los Robles, 2nd Floor

Pasadena, California 91101

Attention: Kathleen Kwan

 

**COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT OF DEED OF TRUST**

 

The undersigned, EVEREST PROPERTIES II, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Assignor”), hereby assigns, transfers and sets over to EAST WEST BANK, a California banking corporation (“Assignee”), as collateral security for obligations owing from Assignor to Assignee, all of Assignor’s interest in the Deed of Trust and Security Agreement dated as of August 1,2001 executed by Sunwood Village Joint Venture, Limited Partnership, a Nevada limited partnership, for the benefit of First Union National Bank, a national banking association, which was recorded on August 2, 2001 in Book No. 20020802, Document No 01912 in the real property records of Clark County, Nevada. 

 

Dated: As of April 23, 2007

 

 

| EVEREST PROPERTIES II, LLC, a

California limited liability company |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  

By:

 

 

                                  |  

EVEREST PROPERTIES, LLC, a

California limited liability company, its

Manager |
|                                                                     | By:  | /S/ W. ROBERT KOHORST |
|                                                                |   | W. Robert Kohorst

President |

 

 

----