alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7307

HAROLD GODWIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus M. J. MCDADE, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-5-5-BR) Submitted: December 11, 2001 Decided: January 9, 2002 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce Tracy Cunningham, Jr., CUNNINGHAM, DEDMOND, PETERSEN & SMITH,Southern Pines, North Carolina, for Appellant. Sandra WallaceSmith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Harold Godwin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Godwin v. McDade , No. CA-01-5-5-BR (E.D.N.C. filed July 19, 2001; entered July 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stephan McConnell, Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 905]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Cataldo, J), rendered June 25, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and resisting arrest, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The People made a sufficiently particularized showing of an overriding interest justifying the court’s use of a screening procedure to exclude the general public from the courtroom during an undercover officer’s testimony, in order to protect his safety and effectiveness. The officer had numerous other cases pending in the courthouse, continued to work undercover in the vicinity of defendant’s arrest, and took specific precautions upon entering the courthouse because he feared being recognized as a police officer (see *People v Jones,*96 NY2d 213 [2001]; *People v Ramos,*90 NY2d 490, 498-499 [1997], *cert denied sub nom. Ayala v New York,*522 US 1002 [1997]). The screening procedure was narrowly tailored to accomplish its purpose. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of New Oriental
Education & Technology Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended May 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Louis T. Hsieh, President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 12, 2012



By:

/s/ Louis T. HsiehName:

Louis T. HsiehTitle:

President and Chief Financial Officer
# L_2013210EN.01001501.xml

| 6.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 210/15

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 751/2013

of 29 July 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Kraški med (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Slovenia’s application to register the name ‘Kraški med’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Slovenia’s application to register the name ‘Kraški med’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Kraški med’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Kraški med’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 July 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 290, 26.9.2012, p. 7.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.4.   Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.)

SLOVENIA

Kraški med (PDO)

---
#### Louise R. Solon, Suing on Behalf of Herself as a Stockholder of Haykel Industries, Inc., Respondent, v. Haykel Industries, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Motion denied, with costs. Memorandum: It is recognized that upon a proper showing an appellate court may permit an appellant to withdraw an appeal (10 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, § 70:246). No such proof has been presented by movants. It is reasonably clear that all parties to the stipulation contemplated that the respective appeals should be effectively terminated by dismissal thereof. Defendants have submitted no facts that move us to amend our former order.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2013238EN.01002301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 6.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 238/23 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 780/2013 of 14 August 2013 amending Commission Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 laying down lists of third countries, territories or parts thereof authorised for the introduction into the European Union of certain animals and fresh meat and the veterinary certification requirements

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 219 of 15 August 2013](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2013_219_R_TOC)
)

On page 8, Model RUM-A:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | point II.1.1(b): |

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | which at the date of issuing this certificate has been free for the past 12 months from rinderpest.’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | which at the date of issuing this certificate has been free for 12 months from rinderpest.’; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | text of footnote (1), at bottom of the page: |

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(1) | [(b) they have not been vaccinated against foot-and-mouth disease.’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(1) | (b) They have not been vaccinated against foot-and-mouth disease.’. |

---
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In  connection with the Annual Report of Epolin, Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended February 28, 2005,
as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned certifies,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley  Act  of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's  knowledge,
that:

      (1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

       (2)   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 25, 2005           By:  /s/ Murray S. Cohen
                                   Murray S. Cohen,
                                   Chairman of the Board and
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)



Dated: May 25, 2005           By:  /s/ James Ivchenko
                                   James Ivchenko,
                                   President (Principal Financial
                                   Officer)
#### §§ 457.10-457.100 [Reserved]
Exhibit
      23.1








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








We
      have
      issued our reports dated June 22, 2007, accompanying the consolidated finan-cial
      statements and schedule of APA Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report
      expressed an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph relating
      to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standard Board Statement No. 123(R), *Share-Based
      Payment* ),
      included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31,
      2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in
      the
      Registration State-ments of APA Enterprises, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.
      333-74214, effective November 30, 2001; File No. 333-44500, effective
      August 25, 2000; File No. 333-44488, effective August 25, 2000; File
      No. 333-44486, effective August 25, 2000; and File No. 333-136828 effective
      August 23, 2006).








/s/GRANT
      THORNTON LLP








Minneapolis,
      Minnesota


June
      22,
      2007
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 15, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 15, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20D0241. JOHN O. QUICK v. JUDITH H. QUICK.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2017CV298338
Page 1 of 2

1

 United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 738 (2005).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs CASE NO.: 5:94cr5036-SPM

JESUS MEJIA,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation dated August 7, 2007 (doc. 337). Defendant has been

furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and filed objections (doc.

340). Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I find that the

report and recommendation is correct and should be adopted by the Court.

Defendant’s § 2255 motion was not timely filed and his Booker1

 issues are

not cognizable on collateral review. Varela v. United States, 400 F.3d. 864, 868

(11th Cir. 2005). Furthermore, Defendant cannot state a viable ineffective of

assistance of counsel claim based on his lawyer’s failure to make a Booker

argument. United States v. Ardley, 273 F.3d 991, 993 (11th Cir. 2001). 

Case 5:94-cr-05036-RS-AK Document 341 Filed 09/13/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

 CASE NO.: 5:94cr5036-SPM

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 337) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence 

(doc. 325) is denied. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of September, 2007.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 5:94-cr-05036-RS-AK Document 341 Filed 09/13/07 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,395]

                    By application dated January 11, 2010, the petitioners requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on December 11, 2009. The Notice of Determination will soon be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the finding that imports of precision sheet metal fabrication did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm and no shift of production to a foreign source occurred.

In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided additional information regarding customers of the subject firm and alleged that the subject firm lost bids to foreign competitors.

The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

## Conclusion

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of January 2010.

Del Min Amy Chen,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-3012 Filed 2-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of APA Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anil K. Jain, Chief
Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  that:

1.   The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   The  information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Signature:  /s/  Anil  K.  Jain
            -------------------
Print  Name:  Anil  K.  Jain
              --------------
Print  Title:  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer
               ---------------------------------------------------------
```

EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Eldorado  Artesian  Springs,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-KSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Douglas Larson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
USC SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Douglas Larson
------------------
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 18, 2005
```
149 So.2d 767

#### Carrie Holland EDWARDS v. Emma Brown SMITH et al.

No. 46578.

Feb. 18, 1963.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
INDEX OF STATE COURT DOCUMENTS Page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HARI OM HARI, INC. DBA LA CASA

INN & SUITES,

Plaintiff,

v.

MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE 

COMPANY 

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO. 4:20-CV-000398

INDEX OF STATE COURT DOCUMENTS

No.

Date Filed

or Entered Document

A N/A Index of State Court Documents

B 8/7/20 State Court Case Docket 

C N/A All papers filed or served in the State Court Case

D 5/17/19 AAA Claim Consultants, Inc.’s May 17, 2019 Damages 

Estimate

E N/A List of all counsel of record and contact information

Case 4:20-cv-00398-MW-MAF Document 1-1 Filed 08/07/20 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

November 7, 2006

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/    Bruce Wasserstein                              
|Bruce Wasserstein Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
22.103-5 Contract clauses.       (a) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.222-1, Notice to the Government of Labor Disputes, in solicitations and contracts that involve programs or requirements that have been designated under 22.101-1(e).                                          (b) 						            The contracting officer shall include the clause at 52.222-2, Payment for Overtime Premiums, in solicitations and contracts when a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold; unless-                                                         (1) 								                A cost-reimbursement contract for operation of vessels is contemplated; or                                                            (2) 								                A cost-plus- incentive-fee contract that will provide a swing from the target fee of at least plus or minus 3 percent and a contractor’s share of at least 10 percent is contemplated.    **Parent topic:** 22.103 Overtime.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2417 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to designate the President William 

Jefferson Clinton Birthplace Home in Hope, Arkansas, as a National 

Historic Site and unit of the National Park System, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2006 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself and Mrs. LINCOLN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to designate the 

President William Jefferson Clinton Birthplace Home 

in Hope, Arkansas, as a National Historic Site and 

unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON BIRTHPLACE 

4 HOME NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE. 

5 (a) ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY; ESTABLISHMENT OF

6 HISTORIC SITE.—Should the Secretary of the Interior ac7 quire, by donation only from the Clinton Birthplace FounVerDate Aug 31 2005 05:39 Mar 16, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2417.IS S2417

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2417 IS

1 dation, Inc., fee simple, unencumbered title to the William 

2 Jefferson Clinton Birthplace Home site located at 117 

3 South Hervey Street, Hope, Arkansas, 71801, and to any 

4 personal property related to that site, the Secretary shall 

5 designate the William Jefferson Clinton Birthplace Home 

6 site as a National Historic Site and unit of the National 

7 Park System, to be known as the ‘‘President William Jef8 ferson Clinton Birthplace Home National Historic Site’’. 

9 (b) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER LAWS.—The Sec10 retary shall administer the President William Jefferson 

11 Clinton Birthplace Home National Historic Site in accord12 ance with the laws generally applicable to national historic 

13 sites, including the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to establish a Na14 tional Park Service, and for other purposes’’, approved 

15 August 25, 1916 (16 U.S.C. 1–4), and the Act entitled 

16 ‘‘An Act to provide for the preservation of historic Amer17 ican sites, buildings, objects and antiquities of national 

18 significance, and for other purposes’’, approved August 

19 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.). 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS