alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Incorporation by Reference 

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0764 

January 21, 2016 

The contents of the following dockets are hereby incorporated by reference into and are 

considered to be included in, contained in and to have been placed in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR2015-0764 (Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule: Leak Detection Methodology Revisions and 

Confidentiality Determinations for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems): 

1) EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0508 (Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting) 

2) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923 (Oil and Natural Gas Systems) 

3) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0924 (Determination of Confidential Business Information) 

4) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0925 (Corporate Parent and NAICS Code in the Greenhouse Gas 

Reporting Rule) 

5) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0926 (Carbon Dioxide Injection and Geologic Sequestration) 

6) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0927 (Additional Sources of Fluorinated Gases) 

7) EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0929 (Change to the Reporting Date for Certain Data Elements 

Required Under the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule) 

8) EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0147 (Minor Technical Corrections and Amendments to the 

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rules) 

9) EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0417 (Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Petroleum and 

Natural Gas Systems, Subpart W: Extension of 2011 BAMM Deadlines) 

10) EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0512 (Technical Revisions for Subpart I and W of the Greenhouse 

Gas Reporting Rule) 

11) EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0831 (Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program Petroleum and Natural 

Gas Systems 2015 Revisions) 

Accessing dockets: 

Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in 

http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Docket, EPA/DC, WJC West Building, 

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. This Docket Facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number 

for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is 

(202) 566-1742.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2513 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2513

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Spiroxamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2006

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Spiroxamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SEC. 1180. SPIROXAMINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.10.70      8-(1,1-             Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Dimethylethyl)-N-                                                  31/2009
                         ethyl-N-propyl-
                         1,4-
                         dioxaspiro[4,5]de
                         cane-2-
                         methanamine (CAS
                         118134-30-8)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2932.99.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Earnest A. DARDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECURE HORIZONS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-15133.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 13, 2007.*

Filed Aug. 22, 2007.

*442Earnest A. Darden, Berkeley, CA, pro se.

David M. Hurmiston, Esq., Edward A. Stumpp, Esq., Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Paul T. Hammerness, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, Bryan M. Tierney, Esq., Scott E. Murray, Esq., Donnelly & Nelson LLP, Walnut Creek, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Earnest A. Darden appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for failure to state a claim his action alleging, *inter alia,*civil rights violations in connection with a prostate examination. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After de novo review, *Ortez v. Washington County,*88 F.3d 804, 807 (9th Cir.1996), we affirm.

The district court properly concluded that the majority of Darden’s claims against the California Department of Health Services were barred by the Eleventh Amendment. *See Burning v. Citibank, N.A.,*950 F.2d 1419, 1422-23 (9th Cir.1991). The district court also properly concluded that any Title VI claim based on the 2001 prostate examination was barred by the statute of limitations. *See Taylor v. Regents of Univ. of Cal,*993 F.2d 710, 711-12 (9th Cir.1993) (per curiam) (holding that Title VI claims, like claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, are governed by the forum state’s statute of limitations for personal injury actions).

Because neither Dr. Unger nor Secure Horizons is a “state actor,” the district court properly concluded that Darden failed to state a claim against those defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. *See Rendell-Baker v. Kohn,*457 U.S. 830, 839-43, 102 S.Ct. 2764, 73 L.Ed.2d 418 (1982).

The district court also properly dismissed Darden’s claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1986 because his conclusory allegations of conspiracy lacked specificity. *See Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Bep’t,*839 F.2d 621, 626 (9th Cir.1988).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Darden’s state-law claims. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) (permitting district court to decline supplemental jurisdiction if it has “dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction”); Acri *v. Varian Associates, Inc.,*114 F.3d 999, 1001 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc) (describing factors district court should consider in declining supplemental jurisdiction).

Darden’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2460 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2460

 To permit access to certain information in the Firearms Trace System 
                               database.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2006

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To permit access to certain information in the Firearms Trace System 
                               database.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIREARMS TRACE SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--The Science, State, Justice, Commerce, and Related 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-108; 119 Stat. 2295) 
is amended in title I, under the heading ``Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 
Firearms and Explosives'', by striking ``Provided further, That no 
funds appropriated under this or any other Act with respect to any 
fiscal year may be used to disclose part or all of the contents of the 
Firearms Trace System database'' and all that follows through ``section 
921(a)(10) of such title):''.
    (b) Access to Information.--The Attorney General shall provide 
public access to the Crime Gun Trace Report (both nationally and for 
individual cities) from the Youth Crime Gun Interdiction Initiative, 
which is generated using information in the Firearms Trace System 
database maintained by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and 
Explosives.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 
 MARK L. WETZEL 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “First Amendment”) is dated as of January 6, 2009, by and between DuPont Fabros
Technology, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and Mark L. Wetzel (the “Executive”). 
 A. The
Company and the Executive are parties to an Employment Agreement (the “Original Agreement”), dated as of June 13, 2008. 
 B. The parties desire to amend the Original Agreement, pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Amendment. 
 Accordingly, the
parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Section 3.7(ii) of the Original Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:

 In addition, the Company shall provide Executive with $60,000 to be used for expenditures related to interim living and travel
arrangements. 
 2. Unless specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain in effect.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed their names as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Lammot J. du Pont

	Name:	 	Lammot J. du Pont
	Title:	 	Executive Chairman
	
	 /s/ Mark L. Wetzel

	Mark L. Wetzel
1999 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-14-1999

Carter v. City of Philadelphia

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 98-1581

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1999 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Carter v. City of Philadelphia" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 127.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/127
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 No. 98-1581 

 Re: Carter v. City of Philadelphia, et al. 

 The following modifications have been made to the Court's Opinion 

issued on 

 April 28, 1999 and to the prior corrections noted in the above-entitled 

appeal and will 

appear as part of the final version of the opinion:

 Page 31, n.61, add the following sentence at the end: 

"To the extent that 

 Carter's claims are predicated on inadequate training, 

supervision or 

 discipline of police officers (as opposed to assistant district 

attorneys), 

 Carter will be required to establish sufficient de jure or de 

facto control by 

 the defendants to supporting a finding of causation. 

 In the prior corrections "de jure" had been incorrectly spelled due 

to a typographic 

error. 

 Very truly yours, 

 /s/ P. Douglas Sisk, Clerk 

Dated: May 14, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           10772709
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                 0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                   0
<EQUITIES>                                         2313
<MORTGAGE>                                            0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                         0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 10974133
<CASH>                                           199112
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                33531
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           358733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13206783
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 3662392
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              129636
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  3514133
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            239932
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         466239
<OTHER-SE>                                      3788112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13206784
<PREMIUMS>                                     21527171
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              584117
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                22556
<OTHER-INCOME>                                        0
<BENEFITS>                                     15529373
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                       21185
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            2770139
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   28982
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               28982
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      28982
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  2650000
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                   0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                     0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             12552822
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                2778498
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 2432000
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        (128498)


</TABLE>
§ 5001.305 Specific application requirements for WWD projects. In addition to the requirements specified in § 5001.303, a lender seeking a loan guarantee for a WWD project must submit the documents specified in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section. ( a ) *Engineering documentation.* ( 1 ) Engineering documentation must meet the level of detail the lender would typically require for a standard commercial loan, and include, at a minimum, a description of the proposed project, a cost estimate, the number of residential and non-residential connections, and the population served. The lender may request assistance to clarify the Agency's requirements and regulations; however, the Agency does not provide technical oversight or recommendations as to the technical feasibility of the project.
( 2 ) The lender must ensure that the project is designed utilizing accepted architectural and engineering practices and conforms to applicable Federal requirements (*e.g.* the seismic requirements of Executive Order 12699 (55 FR 835, 3 CFR, 1990 Comp., p. 269), the debarment requirements of 2 CFR part 417, American Iron and Steel (Section 746 of Title VII of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2017), and the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act (18 U.S.C. 874)); State, local and Tribal codes and requirements; and facility plans or plans and specifications reviewed and approved by the applicable State, local and/or Tribal regulatory agency. The lender must also ensure that the planned project will be completed within the available funds and, once completed, will be suitable for the borrower's needs. Upon completion of the project, the lender must certify that all applicable Federal requirements were met.
( b ) *Feasibility considerations.* All projects financed under this part must be based on projected taxes, assessments, revenues, fees, or other sources of revenues in an amount sufficient to provide for project operation and maintenance, any reserves required by the lender, and debt payment. The lender's financial credit analysis must take into consideration any interest rate adjustment that may be instituted under the terms of the loan note guarantee.
( c ) *Credit analysis requirements.* In addition to the requirements of § 5001.202, if the majority user of the system is a business and the financial success of the system is dependent on that business, then the economic viability of that business must be assessed.
May 19,2015 

U.S. Department ofTra:nsportation 

Office of Aviation Ana1ysis 

Essential Air Service (EAS) 

Washington D.C 

Attn: Michael Martin 

City of Hydaburg 

g:n Street Extension 

P.O. Box 49 

Hydaburg, AK 99922-0049 

(907) 285-376l(voice) 

(907) 285-3760(fax) 

Re: DOCKET DOT-OST-1999-6245 

Proposal to Provide EAS at Hydaburg 

Dear Sir, 

Since 2000, Taquan Air has prov1ded excellent Hoatplane service to Hydaburg, AK. This service 

is vital to our community. Living and working in Southeast Alaska presents many challenges, 

including difficult weather conditions, but TaquM has proven to be reliable, safe and committed 

to serving our cominunity. 

It is our recommendation that a continued EAS be issued to Taquan Air for Hydaburg; AK. 

Thanks fm your consideration and time. 

Sincerely, 

.,.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Public Hearing Attendees Test Procedures for Water Heaters, Ranges,Ovens, Cooktops and Microwave Ovens and Clothes Washers Docket Number EE-RM-94-230 Forrestal Building, Room IE-245 July 12, 1995 Panel Members Ingrid M. Watson Presiding Official Program Manager Kitchen Products Marc LaFrance Profram Manager Clothes Washers Bryan Berringer Program Manager Water Heaters Eugene Margolis Attorney Steve Nabinger Test Engineer Kitchen Products Brian Dougherty Test Engineer Water Heaters Jim Kao Test Engineer Clothes Washers Office of Codes and Standards U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Codes and Standards U.S. Department of Energy Office of Codes and Standards U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy National Institute of Standards and Technology
NationaLInstitute of Standards and Technology
National Institute of Standards and Technology 

# *__6 bSCHEDULE OF PRESENTATIONS Opening Remarks Ingrid M. Watson Presiding Official Scheduled Sneakers WaterHeaters 1. Frank Stanonik 2. Matt Chwalowski 

### Ragesw 4. Jack Weizeorick 5. Charles Samuels Organization
GAMA Edison Electric Institute

AHAM AHAM Microwave Ovens Jack Weizeorick Dennis Wilson Joy Daniels AHAM Frigidaire Sharp

LUNCH BREAK Clothes Washers 9. Charles Samuels 10. Curt Riechman 11. Earl Jones 12. Larry Hawkins 13. Dick Stilwell AHAM Whirlpool General Electric General Electric Maytag UNSCHEDULED SPEAKERS

REBUTTAL STATEMENTS QUESTIONS 

### Time 9:30

9:50 10:05

6. 7. 8. 10:20 10:35

10:50 11:00 11:15 11:45

12:45 12:55 1:10 1:25 1:40 2:10 2:40 3:10GEAppliances
BethA.McClurg Proauct Manager Laundry General Electric Comoany Appliance Park,AP1.2NC-1, Lousville, KY40225 502452-4476 Dial Comm 8'334-4476 Fax 502452-0924



### TestProcedures forWater Heaters, Ranges, Ovens Cooktops andMicrowave Ovens andClothes Washers July 12, 1996
&A , .I. -OC . C f If I_ I l 

## Prod 

# eL c t ItM V 

### _ :a



### _ 

### -ir 5Y 

### v 

## -- I-- 4-)2 - 

# A P-2/\JCS 

### Z- _-- V 7 

### Fax No.- S-2-_ 9 2 -

_ FaxNo. - Telephone Name Title Address 

## (S n/\ Ce 

## 5& P., .4-4-

### TestProcedures forWater Heaters, Ranges, Ovens Cooktops and Microwave Ovens and ClothesWashers July 12, 1995
Name 

### Title Address 

# Be;C. H

# M C.CifL Productf la 

### .XctLePa4' 

# 6c App/,l,'c ., 

# A-PI-- 2 C-/ 1o. v ^ 

### LOL' V'{ V j') 41 

### e )K a 

# -1 C) Z-

## 2 _S_ Telephone C2-452 L2- „ 2 

### - 4 

### S 2

### - No. 9 ~~________Fax No.

_____

.
Exhibit 12.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mindray Medical International Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   /s/ Xu Hang
#### § 51.1158 Mature.

*Mature* shall have the same meaning assigned the term in the Florida Citrus Code, Chapter 601, 1995 Edition, and the Official Rules Affecting the Florida Citrus Industry, in effect as of February 12, 1995. These orange maturity requirements are contained in the Florida Citrus Code, Chapter 601, Florida Statutes, Sections 601.19, and 601.20, 1995 Edition, and the State of Florida Department of Citrus Official Rules Affecting the Florida Citrus Industry, Part 1, Chapter 20-13 Market Classification, Maturity Standards and Processing or Packing Restrictions for Hybrids in effect as of February 12, 1995. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from, Florida Department of Citrus, Post Office Box 148, Lakeland, Florida 33802 or copies of both regulations may be inspected at USDA, AMS, F&VD, FPB, Standardization Section, Room 2065-S, 14th and Independence Ave., Washington, DC 20250 or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.*
22.604 Exemptions.

22.604-1 Statutory exemptions.

22.604-2 Regulatory exemptions.

Parent topic: Subpart 22.6 - Contracts for Materials, Supplies, Articles, and Equipment
#### F. A. Ballard, Doing Business as Fred Ballard Construction Co., Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No. 39892.)

—Motion to resettle order entered on January 12, 1967, denied, without costs. (See *Matter of Sipal Realty Corp.*v. *William,*15 A D 2d 456.) Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
#### Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, et al., Plaintiffs, v Foster Wheeler Corporation, Respondent, and Affiliated FM Insurance Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted June 25, 2007;

decided June 27, 2007

Reported below, 36 AD3d 17.

*832Motion by Complex Insurance Claims Litigation Association for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.