alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER JON PERGROSSI,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-192-AW-GRJ

UNITED STATES POLICE,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This is one of the many frivolous pro se cases Christopher Jon Pergrossi has 

recently filed in this court. I have considered the magistrate judge’s omnibus order 

to show cause and report and recommendation. ECF No. 4. No objections were 

filed.* I agree with the magistrate judge that the action is frivolous and has wasted 

court resources. On the issue of sanctions, the judge in the first-filed case found it to 

be a close call but did not impose sanctions. See No. 1:20-cv-181-MW-GRJ, ECF 

No. 7. I will likewise not impose sanctions at this time.

The clerk will enter judgment that says, “This case is DISMISSED without 

leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).” The clerk will close the file.

* In another of his cases, Pergrossi filed an objection to the omnibus Report 

and Recommendation. See No. 1:20-cv-181-MW-GRJ, ECF No. 6. Although he did 

not file that objection (or any objection) in this case, I have nonetheless considered 

de novo the issues raised in that objection. 

Case 1:20-cv-00192-AW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 10/05/20 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED on October 5, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00192-AW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 10/05/20 Page 2 of 2
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSuckdown, fountain lift, and pressures induced on several tandem jet V/STOL configurationsAs part of a program to improve the methods for predicting the suckdown and hot gas ingestion for jet V/STOL aircraft in ground effect, a data base is being created that provides a systematic variation of parameters so that a new empirical prediction procedure can be developed. The first series of tests in this program was completed. Suckdown, fountain lift, and pressures induced on several two-jet V/STOL configurations are described. It is one of three reports that present the data obtained from tests conducted at Lockheed Aeronautical Systems-Rye Canyon Facility and in the High Bay area of the 40 by 80 foot wind tunnel complex at NASA Ames Research Center.Document ID19910014795Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBellavia, David C.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Wardwell, Douglas A.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Corsiglia, Victor R.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Kuhn, Richard E.*(STO-VL Technology San Diego, CA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1991Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102817NAS 1.15:102817A-90144Accession Number91N24108Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-71Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910014795.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 51.2113 Size requirements.

The size may be specified in terms of range in count of whole almond kernels per ounce or in terms of minimum, or minimum and maximum diameter. When a range in count is specified, the whole kernels shall be fairly uniform in size, and the average count per ounce shall be within the range specified. Doubles and broken kernels shall not be used in determining counts. Count ranges per ounce commonly used are shown below, but other ranges may be specified: Provided, that the kernels are fairly uniform in size.

16 to 18, inclusive.

18 to 20, inclusive.

20 to 22, inclusive.

22 to 24, inclusive.

23 to 25, inclusive.

24 to 26, inclusive.

26 to 28, inclusive.

27 to 30, inclusive.

30 to 34, inclusive.

34 to 40, inclusive.

40 to 50, inclusive.

50 and smaller.
#### Curling v. The State.

’ Appeal from Tuscaloosa Law and Equity Court.

Tried before the Hon.'I. J. Mayfield.

No counsel marked as appearing for appellant.

William C. Fitts, Attorney-General, for the State.

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of robbery, and sentenced to the penitentiary for 35 years. The defendant pleaded guilty. The defendant requested the court to give to the jury the following written charge, and duly excepted to the court’s refusal1 to give the same as asked: “The court charges the jury that they must convict upon the indictment alone to the exclusion of all else ; they must not travel outside of the indictment and rely upon any fact with which they may be personally acquainted in fixing the punishment of the defendant.”

On this appeal the court, holds that the charge asked by the defendant was properly refused. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Opinion by

Haralson, J,
Exhibit 10.2
                                  ------------


International
         Strategic
                  Assets
                           Inc.



                              Management Agreement
                              --------------------
                             (updated March 3, 2003)

         This  management   agreement  will  re-define  the  parameters  of  the
agreement in place between  International  Strategic Assets,  Inc. and Strategic
Futures and Options.

         International Strategic Assets, Inc. shall pay all overhead each month.
During the first week of each month, International Strategic Assets, Inc., shall
invoice  Strategic  Futures and Options for half (50%) of the overhead  paid the
previous month, or $6,976.64 (this change reflects updated billing).

         Strategic  Futures and Options  shall pay that invoice for $6,976.64 in
full on the fifteenth of the month.

         Dated as of March 3, 2003.


International Strategic Assets, Inc.        Strategic Futures and Options, Inc.


By  /s/ Ronald G. Wolfbauer                 By  /s/ Ronald G. Wolfbauer
    -----------------------                     -----------------------
Ronald G. Wolfbauer, Jr.                    Ronald G. Wolfbauer, Jr.
President                                   President and CEO




                       1750 Yankee Doodle Road, Suite 202
                                 Eagan, MN 55121
                       Phone: 651-681-8408 1-800-822-7734
                                Fax: 651-406-9331
#### Khatoun Der Bedrosian et al., Respondents, v City of Cohoes et al., Appellants.

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered March 9, 1979 in Albany County, which granted a motion to strike defendants’ answer and render judgment by default to the plaintiffs unless the defendants produce, for inspection within 20 days, a copy of the defendant police officer’s personnel file and other related material. Appeal dismissed as moot, with costs to respondents. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RANDY HARRY BROOMALL, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 554 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-36928,
33-44215, 33-46310, 33-63350, 33-69034, 33-51443, 33-52517, 33-57049 and
33-64449) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-10621,
33-21756, 33-34288, 33-48858 and 33-54233) of United Asset Management
Corporation of our report dated February 7, 1996 appearing on page 56 of the
Annual Report to Shareholders which is incorporated in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on
the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.



/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 25, 1996


                                       F-2
[Cite as Feazel v. Mills, 123 Ohio St.3d 240, 2009-Ohio-5257.]

F EAZEL ET AL ., A PPELLEES , v . M ILLS ET AL ; S TATE F ARM M UTUAL A UTOMOBILE I NSURANCE C OMPANY , A PPELLANT . [Cite as Feazel v. Mills, 123 Ohio St.3d 240, 2009-Ohio-5257.] Discretionary appeal accepted, court of appeals’ judgment vacated on the authority of Walburn v. Dunlap, and cause remanded to apply Walburn v. Dunlap. (No. 2009-0949

— Submitted September 1, 2009

— Decided October 6, 2009.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Butler County, Nos. CA2009-02-063 and
CA2009-03-091.

__________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals issued on April 9, 2009 dismissing the appeal below is vacated on the authority of Walburn v. Dunlap , 121 Ohio St.3d 373, 2009-Ohio-1221, 904 N.E.2d 863, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals to apply Walburn v. Dunlap

. M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , and C UPP , JJ., concur.
L ANZINGER , J., dissents.

__________________ Gallagher, Gams, Pryor, Tallan & Littrell, L.L.P., and James R. Gallagher, for appellant.

______________________
# L_2015116DE.01002501.xml

| 7.5.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 116/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 116/25

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 1320/2013 der Kommission vom 3. Dezember 2013 zur Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 385/2012 über den Betriebsbogen für die Feststellung der Einkommen in den landwirtschaftlichen Betrieben und die Untersuchung von deren betriebswirtschaftlichen Verhältnissen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 333 vom 12. Dezember 2013
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 333 vom 12. Dezember 2013

Seite 51, Anhang „Betriebsbogen“, Nummer III „Tabellen und spezifische Definitionen und Anleitungen“, Tabelle M „Beihilfen“, Code 2331:

anstatt:

„Olivenanlagen“

muss es heißen:

„Beeren und Schalenobst“

.

---
9.308-1 Testing performed by the contractor.

(a)

(1) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.209-3, First Article Approval-Contractor

Testing, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price contract is contemplated and it is intended

that the contract require-

(i) First article approval; and

(ii) That the contractor be required to conduct the first article testing.

(2) If it is intended that the contractor be required to produce the first article and the production

quantity at the same facility, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its Alternate I.

(3) If it is necessary to authorize the contractor to purchase material or to commence production

before first article approval, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its Alternate II.

(b)

(1) The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 52.209-3,

First Article Approval—Contractor Testing, in solicitations and contracts when a cost-reimbursement

contract is contemplated and it is intended that the contract require

(i) First article approval and

(ii) That the contractor be required to conduct the first article test.

(2) If it is intended that the contractor be required to produce the first article and the production

quantity at the same facility, the contracting officer shall use a clause substantially the same as the

clause at 52.209-3, First Article Approval—Contractor Testing, with its Alternate I.

(3) If it is necessary to authorize the contractor to purchase material or to commence production

before first article approval, the contracting officer shall use a clause substantially the same as the

clause at 52.209-3, First Article Approval—Contractor Testing, with its Alternate II.

Parent topic: 9.308 Contract clauses.
22.300 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for applying the requirements of 40 U.S.C.chapter

37, Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards (the statute) to contracts that may require or involve

laborers or mechanics. In this subpart, the term "laborers or mechanics" includes apprentices,

trainees, helpers, watchmen, guards, firefighters, fireguards, and workmen who perform services in

connection with dredging or rock excavation in rivers or harbors, but does not include any employee

employed as a seaman.

Parent topic: Subpart 22.3 - Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act
#### § 51.1876 Very serious damage.

*Very serious damage* means any specific defect described in § 51.1877, Table II; or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which very seriously detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the tomato.
§ 331.14 Incident response.[5] ( a ) An individual or entity required to register under this part must develop and implement a written incident response plan[6] based upon a site specific risk assessment. The incident response plan must be coordinated with any entity-wide plans, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review. The current incident response plan must be submitted for initial registration, renewal of registration, or when requested.
( b ) The incident response plan must fully describe the entity's response procedures for the theft, loss, or release of a select agent or toxin; inventory discrepancies; security breaches (including information systems); severe weather and other natural disasters; workplace violence; bomb threats and suspicious packages; and emergencies such as fire, gas leak, explosion, power outage, and other natural and man-made events.
( c ) The response procedures must account for hazards associated with the select agent or toxin and appropriate actions to contain such select agent or toxin, including any animals (including arthropods) or plants intentionally or accidentally exposed to or infected with a select agent.
( d ) The incident response plan must also contain the following information: ( 1 ) The name and contact information (*e.g.*, home and work) for the individual or entity (*e.g.*, responsible official, alternate responsible official(s), biosafety officer, etc.);
( 2 ) The name and contact information for the building owner and/or manager, where applicable;
( 3 ) The name and contact information for tenant offices, where applicable;
( 4 ) The name and contact information for the physical security official for the building, where applicable;
( 5 ) Personnel roles and lines of authority and communication;
( 6 ) Planning and coordination with local emergency responders;
( 7 ) Procedures to be followed by employees performing rescue or medical duties;
( 8 ) Emergency medical treatment and first aid;
( 9 ) A list of personal protective and emergency equipment, and their locations;
( 10 ) Site security and control;
( 11 ) Procedures for emergency evacuation, including type of evacuation, exit route assignments, safe distances, and places of refuge; and
( 12 ) Decontamination procedures.
( e ) [Reserved]
( f ) The plan must be reviewed annually and revised as necessary. Drills or exercises must be conducted at least annually to test and evaluate the effectiveness of the plan. The plan must be reviewed and revised, as necessary, after any drill or exercise and after any incident. Drills or exercises must be documented to include how the drill or exercise tested and evaluated the plan, any problems that were identified and corrective action(s) taken, and the names of registered entity personnel participants.
[70 FR 13278, Mar. 18, 2005, as amended at 77 FR 61076, Oct. 5, 2012; 82 FR 6206, Jan. 19, 2017] Footnotes -
331.14
[5] Nothing in this section is meant to supersede or preempt incident response requirements imposed by other statutes or regulations.
[6] Technical assistance and guidance may be obtained by contacting APHIS.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 22, 2011

t0419 

# Order

April 22, 2011

142267 & (33)

CHARLOTTE HOFFNER, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, and

BLUE CROSS AND BL UE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142267 COA: 292275 Gogebic CC: 08-000085-NO RICHARD LANCTOE and LORI LANCTOE, Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, and

PAMELA MACK, TIFFANY K. AHO, and MOUSIE, INC., d/b/a FITNESS XPRESS,
Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 2, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedul e oral argument on whether to grant the application for leave to appeal or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they
should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant remains pending.
Bank
of China Shenzhen Branch

    
      Loan
Certificate

      Date:
March 13, 2009

      
        
          	
                  Applicant

                	
                  Shenzhen
      BAK

                  Battery
      Co., Ltd

                	
                  ID
      card of the Applicant

                	 
      
	
                  Currency

                	
                  RMB

                	
                  Amount

                	
                  100,000,000.00

                
	
                  Contract
      No.

                	
                  09853563

                
	
                  Loan
      Term

                	
                  From
      March 13, 2009 to March 13, 2010

                
	
                  Annual
      rate

                	
                  5.31%

                
	
                  Business
      Transaction No.

                	
                  101LAAA09003808

                	
                  Loan
      type

                	
                  Guaranty

                
	
                  Stamp
      of Applicant

                	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      


        

      

      


      Lending
Bank: (Stamp)
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of KCAP Financial, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the Report), I, Dayl W. Pearson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 7, 2018

          

          By:/s/ Dayl W. PearsonDayl W. Pearson President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

REGINALD HARPER, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv259–WS/HTC

WARDEN OF TAYLOR

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 6) docketed July 16, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that this case be

dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a

court order. Plaintiff has filed no objections to the report and recommendation. 

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 6) is adopted

Case 4:20-cv-00259-WS-HTC Document 7 Filed 08/14/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint and this action are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute the case.

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment, stating: "All claims are dismissed

without prejudice."

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of August , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00259-WS-HTC Document 7 Filed 08/14/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 5001.204 Personal, partnership, and corporate guarantees. The provisions of this section do not apply to passive investors. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, Agency-approved, unsecured personal, partnership, and corporate guarantees for the full term of the guaranteed loan and at least equal to the guarantor's percent interest or membership in the borrower times the guaranteed loan amount are required from any person or entity owning a 20-percent or greater interest or membership in the borrower. In the event a portion of the borrower's ownership interest stock is sold or transferred, the Agency reserves the right to require personal or corporate guarantees from the new owners of a 20-percent or more interest in the borrower.
( b ) When warranted by an Agency assessment of potential financial risk, the Agency may require the following: ( 1 ) Guarantees to be secured;
( 2 ) Guarantees from any person or entity owning less than a 20-percent Interest or membership in the borrower; and
( 3 ) Guarantees from persons whose ownership Interest in the borrower is held indirectly through intermediate or affiliated entities.
( c ) Exceptions to the requirement for personal, partnership or corporate guarantees may be requested by the lender. The lender must document, to the Agency's satisfaction, that collateral, equity, cash flow, and profitability indicate an above-average ability of the borrower to repay the loan. The Agency will evaluate these requests on a case-by-case basis.
( d ) Each guarantor must execute an Agency-approved guarantee form in addition to any guarantee form required by the lender.
( e ) Any amounts paid by the Agency pursuant to a claim by a guaranteed program lender will constitute a Federal debt owed to the Agency by a guarantor of the loan, to the extent of the amount of the guarantor's guarantee.
[85 FR 42518, July 14, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 70357, Dec. 10, 2021; 87 FR 7368, Feb. 9, 2022]