alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(May 8, 1980)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andre Sanchez, Also Known as Chino Sanchez, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County, rendered December 8, 1976, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of two counts of burglary in the third degree. In satisfaction of three separate indictments charging defendant with a total of four counts of burglary in the third degree, seven counts of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree and six counts of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of burglary in the third degree on October 13, 1976. At the plea proceeding defendant stated that he had discussed the matter with his lawyer. He further stated that the plea was not induced by any promise and was what he wanted to do. Defendant admitted that he committed each of the two burglaries and told the court that he understood that he subjected himself to a maximum sentence of seven years imprisonment on each crime. Defendant was sentenced on December 8, 1976 to an indeterminate term of imprisonment having a maximum óf five years on each count with the terms to be served concurrently. No appeal was taken by or on defendant’s behalf until this court granted permission to defendant to file a notice of appeal *nunc pro tunc.*Thereafter, it was discovered that a transcript of the sentence was not available because the stenographer had died before his notes were transcribed and the notes could not be located. On November 2, 1978, this court ordered defendant to prepare a statement of the sentencing minutes from the best available sources. The People agreed to stipulate to accept the extract of the clerk’s minutes of the sentencing hearing as a substitute for the stenographic transcript, but the defendant declined. Instead, defendant sought a reconstruction hearing. This motion was denied. Defendant first argues that this denial was error. We disagree. The record amply demonstrates that such a hearing would be useless. Further, defendant’s contention that grounds existed which would *919justify allowance of a withdrawal of the plea is also without merit. The transcript of the plea proceedings reveals no irregularity in the acceptance of the plea. Defendant points to no evidence of the existence of any appealable issues at the time of the sentencing. The clerk’s minutes contain no indication that a motion for withdrawal of the plea was made at sentencing. Neither defendant nor his attorney alleges in affidavits that any such motion was made. It is not enough to show that the sentencing transcript is missing. Rather, it is the burden of the defendant in a case, such as exists here, to demonstrate the existence of a specific appealable issue *(People v Horton,*49 AD2d 805; *People v Bell,*36 AD2d 406, 408, affd 29 NY2d 882; see *People v Mason,*67 AD2d 747). The defendant herein has not met that burden. The judgment should be affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Sweeney, J. P., Staley, Jr., Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.
exv10w19






EXHIBIT 10.19




Bonuses
for Fiscal Year 2008 and Base Salaries for Fiscal Year 2009 for
Executive Officers




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	2008	 	 	2009	 
	Name and Title	 	Bonus	 	 	Salary	 
	 
	N. Anthony Coles, M.D.

President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	625,000	 	 	$	650,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Matthew K. Fust

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 	$	—	(1)	 	$	420,000	
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Laura A. Brege

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	 	$	187,425	 	 	$	452,600	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Juergen Lasowski

Senior Vice President of Corporate Development
	 	$	88,592	 	 	$	376,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Judy Batlin

Vice President of Organizational Development,
Learning and Human Resources
	 	$	93,033	 	 	$	318,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Gregory W. Schafer

Former Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 	$	102,900      	 	 	$	300,000	(2)
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 








 




			
	(1)	 	Mr. Fust was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective
January 5, 2009.
	 
	(2)	 	As previously disclosed, Mr. Schafer resigned as Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer effective January 5, 2009. His annualized salary for
2009 is the same as for 2008.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 236 (Thursday, December 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30062]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCOF00000-L18200000-XX0000]


Notice of Resource Advisory Council Meeting for the Front Range 
Resource Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976 and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Front Range 
Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 12, 2011, from 9:15 a.m. to 
4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: BLM Royal Gorge Field Office (RGFO), 3028 East Main Street, 
Canon City, CO 81212.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cass Cairns, Front Range RAC 
Coordinator (see address above) Phone: (719) 269-8553. E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a39393b332834291a383637743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bddededcd4cfd3cefddfd1d093dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member Council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and 
management issues associated with public land management in the BLM 
Colorado Front Range District, which includes the RGFO and the San Luis 
Valley Public Lands Center and its respective field offices: Saguache 
Field Office, Del Norte Field Office, and La Jara Field Office. Planned 
topics of discussion and agenda items include: Saguache Field Office's 
Zapata Falls Campground fee proposals, a tour and discussion of the 
Wild Horse Inmate Program (WHIP) at the Ca[ntilde]on City Correctional 
Facility, and manager updates on current land management issues.
    The meeting at the RGFO is open to the public. The public is 
encouraged to make oral comments to the RAC at 9:30 a.m. Written 
statements may also be submitted for the RAC's consideration. The 
public will not be able to attend the WHIP tour due to security 
protocols. Summary minutes for the RAC meetings will be maintained in 
the RGFO and will be available for public inspection and reproduction 
during regular business hours within thirty (30) days following the 
meeting. The agenda will be available 10 days prior to each meeting at: 
http://www.blm.gov/rac/co/frrac/co_fr.htm.

John Mehlhoff,
Associate State Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-30062 Filed 12-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DANIEL K. MAXWELL,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv463–WS/MJF

BRIAN A. HIGGINS, et al,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 9) docketed March 26, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that this case

be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with court

orders. Plaintiff has filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 9) is adopted

Case 4:20-cv-00463-WS-MJF Document 10 Filed 04/27/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint and this action are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with court orders.

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment, stating: "All claims are dismissed

without prejudice."

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of April , 2021.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00463-WS-MJF Document 10 Filed 04/27/21 Page 2 of 2
24.302 Contract clause.       (a) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at FAR 52.224-3, Privacy Training, in solicitations and contracts when, on behalf of the agency, contractor employees will-                                                         (1) 								                Have access to a system of records;                                                            (2) 								                Create, collect, use, process, store, maintain, disseminate, disclose, dispose, or otherwise handle personally identifiable information; or                                                            (3) 								                Design, develop, maintain, or operate a system of records.                                                                             (b) 						            When an agency specifies that only its agency-provided training is acceptable, use the clause with its Alternate I.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 24.3 - Privacy Training
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.650 Requirement to report portfolio valuations to the Agency

You must determine the value of your Loans and Investments in accordance with § 4290.503. You must report such valuations to the Agency within 90 days of the end of the fiscal year in the case of annual valuations, and within 30 days following the close of other reporting periods. You must report material adverse changes in valuations at least quarterly, within 30 days following the close of the quarter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,035,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,063,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                   282,740
<INVENTORY>                                     59,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,487,925
<PP&E>                                      10,804,252
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,255,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,576,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,976,346
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,487,506
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,576,104
<SALES>                                      2,974,907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,080,888
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,907,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,516
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                150,476
<INCOME-TAX>                                    66,209
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             84,267
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    84,267
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
4.1703 Reporting requirements.

(a) Thresholds.

(1) Except as exempted by OFPP guidance, service contractor reporting shall be required for

contracts and first-tier subcontracts for services based on type of contract and estimated total value.

For indefinite-delivery contracts, reporting shall be determined based on the type and estimated

total value of each order under the contract. Indefinite-delivery contracts include, but are not limited

to, contracts such as indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts, Federal Supply

Schedule contracts (FSSs), Governmentwide acquisition contracts (GWACs), and multi-agency

contracts.

(2) Reporting is required according to the following thresholds:

(i) All cost-reimbursement, time-and-materials, and labor-hour service contracts and orders with an

estimated total value above the simplified acquisition threshold.

(ii) All fixed-price service contracts awarded and orders issued according to the following thresholds:

(A) Awarded or issued in Fiscal Year 2014, with an estimated total value of $2.5 million or greater.

(B) Awarded or issued in Fiscal Year 2015, with an estimated total value of $1 million or greater.

(C) Awarded or issued in Fiscal Year 2016, and subsequent years, with an estimated total value of

$500,000 or greater.

(3) Reporting is required for all first-tier subcontracts for services as prescribed in paragraphs

(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section.

(b) Agency reporting responsibilities.

(1) Agencies shall ensure that contractors comply with the reporting requirements of 52.204-14,

Service Contract Reporting Requirements and 52.204-15, Service Contract Reporting Requirements

for Indefinite-Delivery Contracts. Agencies shall review contractor reported information for

reasonableness and consistency with available contract information. The agency is not required to

address data for which the agency would not normally have supporting information. In the event the

agency believes that revisions to the contractor reported information are warranted, the agency

shall notify the contractor no later than November 15. By November 30, the contractor shall revise

the report, or document its rationale for the agency. Authorized agency officials may review the

reports at www.sam.gov.

(2) Agencies are required to compile annually an inventory of service contracts performed for, or on

behalf of, the agency during the prior fiscal year in order to determine the extent of the agency’s

reliance on service contractors. Agencies shall submit a service contract inventory to OMB by

January 15 annually. Then, each agency must post the inventory on its Web site and publish a

Federal Register Notice of Availability by February 15 annually.

(3) Most of the required information is already collected in the Federal Procurement Data System

(FPDS). Information not collected in FPDS will be provided by the contractor, as specified in
52.204-14, Service Contract Reporting Requirements and 52.204-15, Service Contract Reporting

Requirements for Indefinite-Delivery Contracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 4.17 - Service Contracts Inventory
EXHIBIT 12

                        UNUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                              (Dollars in millions)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             ------------------------------
                                                                             1996        1995          1994
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                         <C>          <C>          <C>   
Earnings:
   Income from continuing operations before income taxes                    $341.6       $381.9       $198.6

Add:
   Fixed charges                                                              52.2         48.0         29.6
                                                                            ------       ------       ------
Earnings as adjusted                                                        $393.8       $429.9       $228.2
                                                                            ======       ======       ======


Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                                                         $ 40.7       $ 37.2       $ 18.7
    Interest portion of rent expense                                          11.5         10.8         10.9
                                                                            ------       ------       ------
Total fixed charges                                                         $ 52.2       $ 48.0       $ 29.6
                                                                            ======       ======       ======


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                             7.5          9.0          7.7
                                                                            ======       ======       ======
</TABLE>



For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings as
adjusted consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes plus
fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense and the estimated
interest portion of rent expense.
# 10.003           Contract clause.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.210-1, *Market Research*, in *solicitations* and contracts over $6 million, other than *solicitations* and contracts for the *acquisition* of *commercial products* or *commercial services*.

**Parent topic:**Part 10 - Market Research
Exhibit
      32.1





***CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***


***PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Sputnik, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
      capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
              David LaDukeName: David
              LaDukeTitle: President,
              Chief Executive Officer, and Treasurer





November 8, 2006





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Sputnik, Inc. and will be retained by Sputnik, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





I-2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6258

JEFFREY L. TAYLOR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH HALL, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise M. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-hc-02107-FL) Submitted: August 20, 2007 Decided: August 31, 2007 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey L. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jeffrey L. Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Taylor has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 51.1408 Sample for grade or size determination.

Each sample shall consist of 100 pecans. The individual sample shall be drawn at random from a sufficient number of packages to form a 100-count composite sample. The number of such individual 100-count samples drawn for grade or size determination will vary with the size of the lot. When practicable, at point of packaging the sample may be obtained from the grading belt after sorting has been completed.