alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                                   EXHIBIT 21

                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
             (MAJORITY OR WHOLLY OWNED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Name of Subsidiary                                        State of Incorporation
------------------                                        ----------------------
<S>                                                       <C>

CogenAmerica Newark Inc.                                  Delaware
CogenAmerica Parlin Inc.                                  Delaware
O'Brien (Philadelphia) Cogeneration, Inc.                 Delaware
NRG Generating Ltd.                                       United Kingdom
PoweRent*                                                 United Kingdom
Puma Manufacturing Ltd.                                   United Kingdom
Puma Export Finance Ltd.                                  United Kingdom
Puma Freight Forwarding Ltd.                              United Kingdom
Puma Far East Ltd.                                        United Kingdom
Enercol Energy Systems, Ltd.                              United Kingdom
O'Brien Energy Europe                                     United Kingdom
Philadelphia Biogas Supply, Inc.                          Delaware
CogenAmerica Parlin Supply Corporation                    Delaware
CogenAmerica Newark Supply Corporation                    Delaware
Grays Ferry Cogeneration Partnership*                     Pennsylvania
CogenAmerica Schuylkill Inc.                              Delaware
Grays Ferry Services Partnership                          Pennsylvania
CogenAmerica Funding Inc.                                 Delaware
CogenAmerica Morris, Inc.                                 Delaware
CogenAmerica Morris LLC                                   Delaware
CogenAmerica Asia, Inc.                                   Delaware
Power Service Company                                     Delaware
O'Brien Fuels, Inc.                                       Delaware
SDN Power, Inc.                                           Delaware
CogenAmerica Pryor Inc.                                   Delaware
Oklahoma Loan Acquisition Corporation                     Delaware

</TABLE>

* The Company owns 50% or less of the equity interest in these subsidiaries.



                                       72
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2014
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James R. Maher, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Corinne Pankovcin, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ James R. Maher   
|Name:                 |  | James R. Maher         
|Title:                |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                 |  | July 31, 2014          
|                     
|/s/ Corinne Pankovcin
|Name:                 |  | Corinne Pankovcin      
|Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                 |  | July 31, 2014
#### § 3203.8 Costs.

The designated organization must pay any costs associated with packaging and transportation of the property unless it has made other arrangements. The designated organization must remove property from the USDA agency's premises within 15 calendar days after being notified that the property is available for pickup, unless otherwise coordinated with the USDA agency. If the recipient decides prior to picking up or removing the property that it no longer wants the property, it must notify the USDA agency that approved the transfer request that the property is no longer needed.
S. 2363

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and six

An Act

To extend the educational flexibility program under section 4 of the Education

Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EDUCATIONAL FLEXIBILITY PROGRAM EXTENSION.

(a) EXTENSION AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Education is authorized to carry

out the educational flexibility program under section 4 of the Education Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999 (20 U.S.C. 5891b), until

the date of enactment of an Act that reauthorizes programs under

part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311 et seq.), for any State that was an EdFlex Partnership State on September 30, 2004.

(b) DESIGNATION.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Any designation of a State as an EdFlex Partnership State that was in effect on September 30,

2004, shall be extended until the date of enactment of an

Act that reauthorizes programs under part A of title I of the

Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, if the Secretary of Education makes the determination described in paragraph (2).

(2) DETERMINATION.—The determination referred to in

paragraph (1) is a determination that the performance of the

State educational agency, in carrying out the programs for

which the State has received a waiver under the educational

flexibility program, justifies the extension of the designation.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7226]

Pursuant to section 1007(b)(1) of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub. L. 111-212), and Department of State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that the Government of Haiti is cooperating with United States reconstruction and reform efforts; and is demonstrating a commitment to accountability by removing corrupt officials, implementing fiscal transparency and other necessary reforms of government institutions, and facilitating active public engagement in governance and oversight of public resources.

                    This Determination shall be transmitted to the Congress and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: November 5, 2010.

Jacob J. Lew,

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.

[FR Doc. 2010-29508 Filed 11-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-K/A (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the year ended December 31, 2010:





1. Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.





Date:  May 2, 2011
/s/ David A. BuckelDavid A. Buckel, Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6307
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM DEAGO SALES, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CR-94-37-BO, CA-96-803-5-BO) Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 1997 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Deago Sales, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sales , Nos. CR-94-37-BO; CA-96-803-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 1996; Feb. 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Investors Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 9, 2006
    
    /s/ Domenick A. Cama

Domenick A. Cama
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 1

1

See Edwards v. United States, 114 F.3d 1083 (11TH Cir. 1997) (district courts must treat notices of

appeal in Section 2255 actions as applications for certificates of appealability).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 3:96cr80/LAC

STEVEN ANTHONY GRAHAM

ORDER

The defendant has filed a notice of appeal (doc. 184) which this court construes as

a request for a certificate of appealability.1 Defendant appeals the court’s denial of his

Rule 60(b) motion. (Doc. 183). Unless a certificate of appealability is issued, the

defendant may not take an appeal from the final order denying a Rule 60(b) motion.

Gonzalez v. Secretary of Department of Corrections, 317 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11th Cir. 2003).

A certificate of appealability should not issue in the appeal from the denial of a Rule 60(b)

motion in a habeas case unless the petitioner/defendant shows, at a minimum, that it is

debatable among jurists of reason whether the district court abused its discretion, see

Mobley v. Head, 306 F.3d 1096, 1097 (11th Cir. 2002) (“This Court reviews a denial of a

60(b) motion for an abuse of discretion.”). Because the court finds the defendant has not

made the requisite showing, his request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of April, 2008.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:96-cr-00080-LC-CJK Document 191 Filed 04/22/08 Page 1 of 1
# L_2022285EN.01003101.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 285/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 285/31

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1189 of 7 May 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the production and marketing of plant reproductive material of organic heterogeneous material of particular genera or species

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 258 of 20 July 2021
  )

On page 24, the heading and the title of Article 7 are replaced as follows:

for:

‘Artikel 7

Anforderungen an die Verpackung und Kennzeichnung von Pflanzenvermehrungsmaterial aus ökologischem/biologischem heterogenem Material’,

read:

‘Article 7

Requirements concerning packaging and labelling of plant reproductive material of organic heterogeneous material’.

---
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of TransMontaigne Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randall J. Larson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 
| | 

| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|/S/ Randall J. Larson                                                                                                        
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Randall J. Larson Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, ChiefAccounting Officer and Controller February 14, 2003
§ 4285.24 Eligibility. To enter into a cooperative agreement for these funds, the applicant must: ( a ) Be a State Agency as defined in § 4285.3 of this subpart;
( b ) Have the financial, legal, administrative, and actual capacity to assume and carry out the responsibilities imposed by the Agreement. To meet the requirement of actual capacity it must either: ( 1 ) Have necessary background and experience with proven ability to perform responsibly in the field of economic, business management, or other needed research area; or
( 2 ) Have the necessary administrative and supervisory controls in place to assure an agreed upon contracting organization has the proven ability to perform responsibly in the field of economic, business management, or other needed research area;
( c ) Legally obligate itself to administer cooperative agreement funds, provide adequate accounting of the expenditure of such funds, and comply with the cooperative agreement;
( d ) Provide at least 50 percent of the funds necessary to conduct the research from non-federal funds; and
( e ) Agree to conduct proposed research related to cooperatives and agricultural marketing.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 22-20469 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus Carlos Etcheverry Hernandez-Guerrero, Defendant—Appellant

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21-CR-535-1

______________________________ Before Stewart, Dennis, and Willett, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * Carlos Etcheverry Hernandez-Gu errero appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for reentry of a removed alien. He contends, and the Government agrees , that the written judgment must be corrected because it contains a conditio n of supervised release that conflicts with the district court’s oral pronouncement of his sentence.

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 10, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-20469 Document: 00516745475 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/10/2023No. 22-20469

2 We agree with the parties that the written condition requiring Hernandez-Guerrero to submit to, and pay for, substance-abuse testing to determine if he has used a prohibited substance and prohibiting him from tampering with the testing methods is a discretionary condition under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) that the district court did not pronounce as required at sentencing. See United States v. Diggles , 957 F.3d 551, 559-63 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc). That condit ion materially differs from the oral pronouncement and must be excised from the written judgment. See United States v. Prado , 53 F.4th 316, 318-19 (5th Cir. 2022); United States v. Perez-Espinoza , 31 F.4th 988, 989 (5th Cir. 2022). Accordingly, we VACATE in part and REMAND to the district court to amend the written judg ment to conform with the oral pronouncement, consistent with this opinion. In all other respects, the judgment is AFFIRMED

. Case: 22-20469 Document: 00516745475 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/10/2023
§ 4280.156 Selecting EA and REDA grant applications for award. Unless otherwise provided for in a Federal Register notice, EA and REDA grant applications will be processed in accordance with this section. EA and REDA grant funding is maintained at the National Office and applications compete for funds only once in a nationwide competition. ( a ) *Application competition.* Complete EA and REDA applications received by the Agency by 4:30 p.m. local time on January 31 will be competed against each other. If January 31 falls on a weekend or a Federally observed holiday, the next Federal business day will be considered the last day for receipt of a complete application. Complete applications received after 4:30 p.m. local time on January 31, regardless of the postmark on the application, will be processed in the subsequent fiscal year. Unless otherwise specified in a Federal Register notice, the two highest scoring applications from each State, based on the scoring criteria established under § 4280.155, will compete for initial funding. If undersubscribed on eligible applications, the third highest scoring application from each state shall be requested for National Office review and potential competition, ranking and funding, until funds are expended.
( b ) *Ranking of applications.* All applications submitted to the National Office under paragraph (a) of this section will be ranked in priority score order. All applications that are ranked and meet the minimum scoring threshold will be considered for selection for funding.
( c ) *Selection of applications for funding.* Using the ranking created under paragraph (a) of this section, the Agency will consider the score an application has received compared to the scores of other ranked applications, with higher scoring applications receiving first consideration for funding. If two or more applications score the same and if remaining funds are insufficient to fund each such application, the Agency will distribute the remaining funds to each such application on a pro-rata basis. At its discretion, the Agency may also elect to redirect unused funds into the RES/EEI program or allow any remaining multi-year funds to be carried over to the next fiscal year rather than funding on a pro-rata basis.
( d ) *Handling of ranked applications not funded.* Based on the availability of funding, a ranked application submitted for EA or REDA funds may not be funded. Such ranked applications will not be carried forward into the next Federal fiscal year's competition.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     We have issued our reports dated May 5, 1998, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Kent
Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended March
28, 1998. We do hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports
in the Registration Statements of Kent Electronics Corporation on Form S-3, File
No. 333-20265 and Form S-8, File Nos. 33-12028, 33-17821, 33-18527, 33-66030,
and 333-20367.



GRANT THORNTON LLP


Houston, Texas
June 24, 1998