alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.640 Requirement to file portfolio financing reports with the Agency.

For each Financing you make (excluding guarantees), you must submit a Portfolio Financing Report on SBA Form 1031 or other USDA-approved form(s) within 30 days of the closing date.

[76 FR 80223, Dec. 23, 2011]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 5:89cr5004/RV

TOMMY BIRCH

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Vinson on 05/27/2008 

Type of Motion/Pleading MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIARY NOTICE, construed as

a motion to appeal in forma pauperis

Filed by: Defendant on 5/12/08 Doc. No. 152

( ) Stipulated/Consented/Joint Pleading

RESPONSES:

on Doc. No.

on Doc. No.

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

/s/ V. Harmon

Deputy Clerk

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 27th day of

 May , 2008, that:

(a) The requested relief is DENIED.

(b) This appeal is not taken in good faith. The defendant was granted

a reduction in sentence under Amendment 706 from a term of 720 

months imprisonment to a term of 360 months. (A comparable 

sentence would have been 584 months.) 

(c) The Federal Public Defender was appointed for limited purposes 

of dealing with Amendment 706, which do not include

representation on appeal. See order dated March 28, 2008.

/s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:89-cr-05004-RV Document 155 Filed 05/27/08 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
        32.2
  
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  
 In
        connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Arrow Resources
        Development, Inc. (the Company ) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report
        ), I,
        Peter J. Frugone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that, subject to the disclosure of deficiencies in the Company’s disclosure
        controls and procedures set forth in Item 8A of the Report:
 
 (1)
        the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  June
          26,
          2008


/s/ Peter
                J. FrugonePeter
                J. FrugoneChief
                Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 15, 2015

d0512

Order 

Clerk

May 15, 2015

149742

SIMON KASSEM, Personal Representative of

the Estate of ABDULLA KASSEM,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149742

COA: 311057

Wayne CC: 10-000163-NI

TIMOTHY MICHAEL GADDY and 

EFFICIENT HAULING SERVICES, L.L.C.,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RAYMOND LATSON,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 1:03-CV-148-SPM/AK

NURSE HAGAN, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND DISMISSING DEFENDANT SPANN

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the magistrate judge's report

and recommendation (doc. 94) dated November 17, 2005. The parties have

been furnished a copy and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. 

No objections have been filed.

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have

determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 94) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 1:03-cv-00148-SPM-AK Document 100 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. Defendant Janice Spann is hereby dismissed as a defendant in this

case.

3. The case shall proceed against the remaining defendants.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-first day of December, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

/pao

Case 1:03-cv-00148-SPM-AK Document 100 Filed 12/21/05 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Docket 57-2010]

The comment period for the application for subzone status at the Toho Tenax America, Inc., facility in Rockwood, Tennessee, submitted by the Industrial Development Board of Blount County, Tennessee (75 FR 61696, 10/6/2010), is being extended to January 20, 2011, to allow interested parties additional time in which to comment. Rebuttal comments may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period, until February 4, 2011. Submissions (original and one electronic copy) shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at: Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 2111, 1401 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230.

                    For further information, contact Diane Finver at                     *Diane.Finver@trade.gov*                     or (202) 482-1367.                

Dated: November 22, 2010.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-30132 Filed 11-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
MIAFH * INMATE DISCIPLINE DATA * 05-21-2021 

 PAGE 001 OF 001 * CHRONOLOGICAL DISCIPLINARY RECORD * 10:33:05 

 

 REGISTER NO: 14878-069 NAME..: SEPULVEDA, JOSE ELIAS

 FUNCTION...: PRT FORMAT: CHRONO LIMIT TO ___ MOS PRIOR TO 05-21-2021 

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 REPORT NUMBER/STATUS.: 2242371 - SANCTIONED INCIDENT DATE/TIME: 12-01-2011 1300

 DHO HEARING DATE/TIME: 01-06-2012 1300 

 FACL/CHAIRPERSON.....: COM/CARRERO 

 APPEAL CASE NUMBER(S): 675609 

 REPORT REMARKS.......: INMATE FOUND GUILTY OF CODE 331.

 331 POSSESSNG A NON-HAZARDOUS TOOL - FREQ: 1 

 DS / 30 DAYS / CS 

 COMP: LAW: 30 DAYS D/S. TIME SERVED.

 LP COMM / 120 DAYS / CS 

 COMP: LAW: 120 DAYS LOSS OF COMMISSARY. RESTORE 05-04-2012.

 LP EMAIL / 120 DAYS / CS 

 COMP: LAW: 120 DAYS LOSS OF TRULINCS. RESTORE 05-04-2012.

 LP VISIT / 30 DAYS / CS 

 COMP: LAW: 30 DAYS LOSS OF VISITS. RESTORE 02-04-2012.

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 REPORT NUMBER/STATUS.: 682583 - SANCTIONED INCIDENT DATE/TIME: 05-19-1999 1205

 UDC HEARING DATE/TIME: 05-20-1999 0830 

 FACL/UDC/CHAIRPERSON.: LVN/AL1/SWANSON 

 REPORT REMARKS.......: LOSS OF COMMASSERY AND PHONE FOR 30 DAYS

 306 REFUSING WORK/PGM ASSIGNMENT - FREQ: 1 

 LP COMM / 30 DAYS / CC 

 COMP: LAW: SAME AS ABOVE ALL ARE FOR 30 DAYS TOTAL

 307 REFUSING TO OBEY AN ORDER - FREQ: 1 

 LP PHONE / 30 DAYS / CC 

 COMP: LAW: LOSS OF PHONE 

 05-20-1999 TO 06-20-1999

 316 BEING IN UNAUTHORIZED AREA - FREQ: 1 

 LP COMM / 30 DAYS / CC 

 COMP: LAW: LOSS OF COMMASSERY FOR 30 DAYS

 05-20-1999 TO 06-20-1999

 

 G0005 TRANSACTION SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED - CONTINUE PROCESSING IF DESIRED

Case 1:88-cr-01026-MW-GRJ Document 3578-2 Filed 05/24/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.2  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Denise Smith, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Silver Pearl Enterprises, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 15, 2008        /s/ Denise Smith    Denise Smith     Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 23, 2020

No. 04-19-00811-CV

Yvonne SALAZAR-HERNANDEZ and Tony Hernandez,

Appellants

v.

CHAMPION HOMES AT MISSION DEL RIO,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CV07914

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court’s judgment was signed on November 7, 2019, and appellants timely filed a 

notice of appeal. The reporter’s record was filed on November 20, 2019 and the clerk’s record 

was filed on November 25, 2019. Therefore, appellants’ brief was originally due to be filed on 

December 27, 2019. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension was filed. On January 30, 

2020, the clerk of this court notified appellant that the appellants’ brief was late and that either 

the brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief should be filed within ten days, i.e., by 

February 10, 2020. To date, neither the appellant’s brief nor a motion for extension of time has 

been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b).

It is therefore ORDERED that appellants show cause in writing within ten (10) days

from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a).

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of March, 2020.
___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of Jeff’s Bar & Restaurant Inc., Respondent, v. State Liquor Authority, Appellant.

Determination of the State Liquor Authority, finding the petitioner in violation of subdivision 6 of section 106 and sections 101-a, or 101-aa of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, and canceling the petitioner’s restaurant liquor license, unanimously modified on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion to annul the cancellation of the license and to limit the penalty to 10 days’ suspension on charges numbered 1, 2 and 3; such 10-day suspension to run concurrently, and to limit the penalty for charge numbered 4 to a 5-day suspension, execution of which is to be suspended, and as so modified the determination is confirmed, without costs or disbursements to either party. Although Special Term should have transferred the proceeding to the Appellate Division (CPLR 7803, subd. 4; 7804, subd. [g], the record now being before us, this court will treat the proceeding as if it had been properly transferred. *(Matter of Defiance Paper Co.*v. *Browne,*268 App. Div. 931.) While we, in the first instance, might not have found that the one incident which is involved in charges numbered 1, 2 and 3 necessarily indicated improper supervision, or that the petitioner permitted the licensed premises to become disorderly, we cannot say that the determination of the State Liquor Authority was not supported by substantial evidence. With respect to charge number 4, a plea of no contest was entered with an explanation as to the reasons why the cheeks were issued. While, of course, the explanation does not constitute a defense, standing uncontradicted we give it some weight in determining the penalty. In view of the fact that petitioner has been in business for some 30 years, and the record does not indicate any adverse history and, further, considering that the charges numbered 1, 2 and 3 involved but a single incident, we think that the penalty imposed was an abuse of discretion. (CPLR 7803, subd. 3.) Accordingly, the penalty imposed is reduced as above stated. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Steuer and Rabin, JJ.
13.301 Governmentwide commercial

purchase card.

(a) Except as provided in 32.1108(b)(2), the Governmentwide commercial purchase card is

authorized for use in making and/or paying for purchases of supplies, services, or construction. The

Governmentwide commercial purchase card may be used by contracting officers and other

individuals designated in accordance with 1.603-3. The card may be used only for purchases that are

otherwise authorized by law or regulation.

(b) Agencies using the Governmentwide commercial purchase card shall establish procedures for

use and control of the card that comply with the Treasury Financial Manual for Guidance of

Departments and Agencies (TFM 4-4500) and that are consistent with the terms and conditions of

the current GSA credit card contract. Agency procedures should not limit the use of the

Governmentwide commercial purchase card to micro-purchases. Agency procedures should

encourage use of the card in greater dollar amounts by contracting officers to place orders and to

pay for purchases against contracts established under part 8 procedures, when authorized; and to

place orders and/or make payment under other contractual instruments, when agreed to by the

contractor. See 32.1110(d) for instructions for use of the appropriate clause when payment under a

written contract will be made through use of the card.

(c) The Governmentwide commercial purchase card may be used to-

(1) Make micro-purchases;

(2) Place a task or delivery order (if authorized in the basic contract, basic ordering agreement, or

blanket purchase agreement); or

(3) Make payments, when the contractor agrees to accept payment by the card (but see

32.1108(b)(2)).

Parent topic: Subpart 13.3 - Simplified Acquisition Methods
|  | Ground Water & Drinking WaterRecent Additions | Contact Us | Print 										Version 										Search: 										EPA Home >					 Water > 					Ground Water & Drinking Water >					breadcrumb? >                                         Technical Fact Sheet: Final Filter Backwash Recycling Rule |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Technical Fact Sheet: Final Filter Backwash Recycling Rule  
EPA 815-F-01-001 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# 23.1105 Contract clause.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.223-18, Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving, in all *solicitations* and contracts.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 23.11 - Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving
#### § 3560.50 OMB control number.

The information collection requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and have been assigned OMB control number 0575-0189. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to vary from 15 minutes to 18 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. A person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
EPA REGISTRATION 

NO. 70506-226 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
155

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
______________________________________________________________

Page 170 is not included in this copy. 

Pages through are not included in this copy. 

_________________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of 

information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

__ __ Identity of product impurities. 

__ __ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

__ __ Description of quality control procedures. 

__ __ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

__ __ FIFRA registration data. 

__ __ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _ .

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

__ __ Internal deliberative information. 

__ __ Privileged attorney-client communication. 

__ __ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

 Agency.
-77.4 -77.2 -77.0 -76.8 -76.6 -76.4

 38.6

 38.8

 39.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
#### §§ 4284.515-4284.599 [Reserved]
3.103-3 The need for further certifications.

A contractor that properly executed the certificate before award does not have to submit a separate

certificate with each proposal to perform a work order or similar ordering instrument issued

pursuant to the terms of the contract, where the Government’s requirements cannot be met from

another source.

Parent topic: 3.103 Independent pricing.
**EXHIBIT A**

**MODIFICATIONS TO MULTIFAMILY NOTE**

 

The following modifications are made to the text of the Note that precedes this Exhibit.

 

| 1. | Section 10(e)(B), the definition of “Assumed Reinvestment Rate” shall be deleted and replaced with the following: |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**Assumed Reinvestment Rate**: one-twelfth (1/12) of the sum of the yield rate, as of the date 5 Business Days before the Prepayment Date, on the Treasury Security, as reported in *The Wall Street Journal*, expressed as a decimal calculated to five digits, plus 50 basis points. In the event that no yield is published on the applicable date for the Treasury Security, Lender, in its discretion, shall select the non-callable Treasury Security maturing in the same year as the Treasury Security with the lowest yield published in The Wall Street Journal as of the applicable date. If the publication of such yield rates in The Wall Street Journal is discontinued for any reason, Lender shall select a security with a comparable rate and term to the Treasury Security. The selection of analternate security pursuant to this Section shall be made in Lender’s discretion.

 

 

| /S/WRK          |   | /S/WRK           |
|-----------------|--------|------------------|
| Borrower’s |   | Guarantor’s |
| Initials        |   | Initials         |

 

 

----
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2ND SESSION S. 2447 

To redesignate the White Rocks National Recreation Area in the State of 

Vermont as the ‘‘Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16 (legislative day, MARCH 15), 2006 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself and Mr. JEFFORDS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To redesignate the White Rocks National Recreation Area 

in the State of Vermont as the ‘‘Robert T. Stafford 

White Rocks National Recreation Area’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROBERT T. STAFFORD WHITE ROCKS NATIONAL 

4 RECREATION AREA . 

5 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The White Rocks National 

6 Recreation Area in the State of Vermont, as established 

7 by section 202 of the Vermont Wilderness Act of 1984 

8 (16 U.S.C. 460nn–1), is redesignated as the ‘‘Robert T. 

9 Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 2447 CPS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the recreation area referred to in subsection (a) 

4 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Robert T. Stafford 

5 White Rocks National Recreation Area. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS