alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2021342EN.01004301.xml

| 27.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 342/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 342/43

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/1715

of 24 September 2021

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 of 7 July 2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2465/96 (1), and in particular Article 11(b) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists public bodies, corporations and agencies and natural and legal persons, bodies and entities of the previous government of Iraq covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources that were located outside Iraq on 22 May 2003 under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists public bodies, corporations and agencies and natural and legal persons, bodies and entities of the previous government of Iraq covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources that were located outside Iraq on 22 May 2003 under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 21 September 2021, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one entity from the list of persons and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 21 September 2021, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one entity from the list of persons and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.

| (3) | Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 September 2021.

For the Commission,

On behalf of The President,

Director-General

Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union

---

(1)  
  OJ L 169, 8.7.2003, p. 6.

1

---

ANNEX

In Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003, the following entry is deleted:

| ‘22. | BAGHDAD STOCK EXCHANGE. Address: The White Palace, Al Nidhal Street, P.O. Box 5157, Baghdad, Iraq.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘22.

BAGHDAD STOCK EXCHANGE. Address: The White Palace, Al Nidhal Street, P.O. Box 5157, Baghdad, Iraq.’

---
1 h 

### From: Peacock, Rebecca [mailto:Rebecca.Peacock@Rolls

- Royce.com]



### Sent: Monday, April 27

1 2015 11:03 AM



### To: Cerra, Anthony (FAA); Green, Robert ( FAA )



### Cc: Fernandes, Carlos (FAA); Swain, Belinda A; Jakeway

1 Ian



### Subject: Trent 1000 Enhanced Ratings

- petition for exemption from 33.27(f)(6)

- Response to clarifying questions

Dear Mr Cerra

, Mr Green,

We are in receipt of FAA's March 2 0 1 2015 letter requesting more information in support of the Rolls

- Royce Petition for

Exemption from Title 14

, CFR 33.27(f)(6) for the Enhanced Ratings Trent 1000 models.

In response to the questions posed in the letter we would !ike to provide the attached Rolls

- Royce technical report,

DNS200125 issue 5. This report has been shared with FAA previously at an earlier revision, and has now been updated

to issue 5 specifically to provide more information on the topics highlighted by FAA for the new engine models under

consideration.

Please contact me if you need any further

information, Yours sincerely,

Rebecca Peacock

Airworthines s Specialist

Rolls

- Royce pic



### Moor Lane, A2



### Ml

- 52

PO Box 31, Derby DE24 8BJ, UK



### +44(0)1332 2 49428

+44(0)7827 257290

rebecca

. peacock@ r o lis

- royc e .com



### The data contained in, or attached to, this e

- mail, may contain confidential information. If you have received it

in error you should notify the sender immediately by reply e

- mail, delete the message from your system and

contact +44 (0) 1332 622800(Security Operations Centre) if you need assistance. Please do not copy it for any

purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person.

An e

- mail response to this address may be subject to interception or monitoring for operational reasons or for

lawful business practices.

(c) 2015 Rolls

- Royce plc

Registered office: 62 Buckingham Gate, London SWI E 6AT Company number: 1003142. Registered in

England.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PICTURTEL'S
BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 1, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q FILING.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          23,974
<SECURITIES>                                    27,891
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,303
<INVENTORY>                                     39,115
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,172
<PP&E>                                         216,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                 131,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,346
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         45
<COMMON>                                           411
<OTHER-SE>                                     118,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   265,098
<SALES>                                         65,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,067
<CGS>                                           47,348
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,348
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,762
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,048
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       834
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,842)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,842)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.59)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Alisa R. Kantor, Respondent, v Richard P. Schmidt, Individually and as the Present President of the State University of New York at Stony Brook, Appellant.

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel Richard P. Schmidt, president of the State University of New York at Stony Brook, to grant, produce and deliver to the petitioner a Baccalaureate Degree in Arts, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 20, 1979, which granted the petition and directed the appellant to approve, authorize and confer upon the petitioner the degree of Bachelor of Arts *nunc pro tunc*as of May, 1979. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Despite the statement in Special Term’s memorandum decision that this article 78 proceeding previously had been converted to a declaratory judgment action, the judgment actually rendered makes no declaration and grants mandamus-type relief. Special Term’s difficulty undoubtedly derived from the fact that petitioner improperly attached to her petition a previously dismissed complaint for declaratory relief in the United States District Court. Since an article 78 proceeding was the proper remedy, we now reconvert the matter to such a proceeding and affirm the grant of the requested relief. Petitioner is entitled to relief solely on the ground that the appellant failed to comply with a regulation of the Commissioner of Education. The university was required to make adequate provision "to record student progress toward the achievement of requirements, and to inform students periodically of their progress and remaining obligations” (see 8 NYCRR 52.2 [b] [4]). Since this regulation was not complied with in petitioner’s case and she completed 120 credits, she was entitled to receive her degree. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Lazer and Margett, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT March 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR FISCAL QUARTER ENDED March 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<CASH>                            1,925,884
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       512,570
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                         487,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  5,110,535
<PP&E>                            3,280,653
<DEPRECIATION>                      972,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   14,131,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,957,790
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                         140,003
<COMMON>                            350,915
<OTHER-SE>                       11,201,265
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     14,131,616
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,549,519
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    3,201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (2,622,628)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (2,622,628)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (2,622,628)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (0.077)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.078)

        

</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2383 

To amend the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity 

Act: A Legacy for Users to make a technical correction. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2006 

Mr. BAUCUS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users to make a 

technical correction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONTRACT AUTHORITY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1940 of the Safe, Ac5 countable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: 

6 A Legacy for Users (Public Law 109–59; 119 Stat. 1511) 

7 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(c) CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—Funds made available 

9 to carry out this section shall be available for obligation 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 2383 IS

1 in the same manner as if the funds were apportioned 

2 under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code.’’. 

3 (b) RECISION.—Of the unobligated balances of funds 

4 apportioned to States under chapter 1 of title 23, United 

5 States Code, $50,000,000 is rescinded. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott Macleod, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                                                  |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Scott Macleod                                     |
| Scott Macleod                                         |
| Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer |

August 7, 2009
Page 1 of 2 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

JOSEPH JACKSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5061/LAC/EMT 

OFFICER JOSEPH GUNN, et al., 

 Defendants. 

__________________________/ 

O R D E R

 The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on June 18, 

2020 (ECF No. 6). Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

 1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

6) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court. 

 

Case 3:20-cv-05061-LC-EMT Document 7 Filed 07/20/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 

Case No. 3:20cv5061/LAC/EMT

 3. The clerk is directed to close this case. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of July, 2020. 

 

 LACEY A. COLLIER 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier 

Case 3:20-cv-05061-LC-EMT Document 7 Filed 07/20/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 3600.1 General.

The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) was established on April 17, 1986, by Secretary's Memorandum 1020-24, which renamed the Statistical Reporting Service concurrent with an internal restructuring. Primary NASS responsibilities are development and dissemination of national and State agricultural statistics, statistical research, and coordination of Department statistical programs.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Uniwell Electronic Corporation., on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending April 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Luiz Brasil, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended April 30, 2013, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and April 30, 2013 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Uniwell Electronic Corporation.



|                  |     |                                                               | 
|----------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|September 5, 2013 | By: | /s/ Luiz Brasil                                               | 
|                  |     | Luiz Brasil                                                   | 
|                  |     | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer               | 
|                  |     | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KRISTOPHER K. JERNIGAN,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5670/LAC/EMT

ESCAMBIA COUNTY ROAD PRISON, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on October

19, 2020 (ECF No. 6). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.

6) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an order of the court.

Case No.: 3:20cv5670/LAC/EMT

Case 3:20-cv-05670-LC-EMT Document 7 Filed 11/18/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk is directed to close this file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of November, 2020.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 3:20cv5670/LAC/EMT

Case 3:20-cv-05670-LC-EMT Document 7 Filed 11/18/20 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:96-cr-00056-RH-WCS   Document 742   Filed 01/06/06   Page 1 of 2

Case 4:96-cr-00056-RH-WCS   Document 742   Filed 01/06/06   Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-79979 on Form S-8 of National Bankshares, Inc. of our reports dated February 26, 2009 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of National Bankshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

 

|   |  |
|--------|--|

Winchester, Virginia

March 16, 2009
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.510 Approval of RBIC's Investment Adviser/Manager. ( a ) *General.* You may employ an Investment Adviser/Manager who will be subject to the supervision of your board of directors, managing member(s), or general partner(s). If you have Leverage or plan to seek Leverage, you must obtain the Agency's prior written approval of the management contract. Approval of an Investment Adviser/Manager for one RBIC does not indicate approval of that manager for any other RBIC.
( b ) *Management contract.* The contract must: ( 1 ) Specify the services the Investment Adviser/Manager will render to you and to your Portfolio Concerns; and
( 2 ) Indicate the basis for computing Management Expenses.
( c ) *Material change to approved management contract.* Any proposed material change must be approved by both you and the Agency in advance. If you are uncertain whether the change is material, submit the proposed revision to the Agency.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:03-CR-1-SPM

NATALIE COTTON PETERS,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant’s request for a sentence

reduction under the retroactive crack cocaine amendment (Amendments 706 and 711)

and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (doc. 158) and her Motion to Appoint Counsel (doc. 162). The

Government has filed a response in opposition (doc. 159).

Upon review, the Court finds that Defendant is not entitled to a sentence

reduction because application of the guideline amendment results in no change to her

sentencing range. Defendant’s offense involved more than 12 kilograms of cocaine

base and corresponds to a base offense level of 38 under the both old drug quantity

table and the amended drug quantity table. Because Defendant’s sentencing range

remains the same after the application of the amendment, she is not eligible for a

reduction. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

Case 4:03-cr-00001-SPM-AK Document 163 Filed 05/01/08 Page 1 of 2
2

1. Defendant’s request for a sentence reduction (doc. 158) is denied.

2. Defendant’s Motion to Appoint Counsel (doc. 162) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this first day of May, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cr-00001-SPM-AK Document 163 Filed 05/01/08 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer ofTransMontaigne Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)          the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, filed onthe date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|        | /s/ RANDALL J. LARSON                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Randall J. Larson                                       |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting  Officer* |
|   | February 9, 2006                                   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 21

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF UNUM CORPORATION

Listed below are the subsidiaries of UNUM Corporation, as of December 31, 1996,
with their respective jurisdiction of incorporation.

UNUM Holding Company (Delaware)

         First UNUM Life Insurance Company (New York)
         Claims Service International, Inc. (Delaware)

UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (Maine)

Colonial Companies, Inc. (Delaware)

         Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Company (South Carolina)
         BenefitAmerica, Inc. (South Carolina)

UNUM European Holding Company Limited (United Kingdom)

         UNUM Limited (United Kingdom)
         Claims Services International Limited (United Kingdom)

Duncanson & Holt, Inc. (New York)

         Duncanson & Holt Services, Inc. (Maine)
         Group Management Services, Inc. (Washington)
         Duncanson & Holt Administrative Services, Inc. (Delaware)
         Duncanson & Holt Canada Ltd. (Canada)
         TRI-CAN Reinsurance, Inc. (Canada)
         Duncanson & Holt Asia PTE Ltd. (Singapore)
         Duncanson & Holt Europe Ltd. (United Kingdom)

                    Duncanson & Holt Underwriters Ltd. (United Kingdom)
                    Duncanson & Holt Agencies Ltd. (United Kingdom)
                    Duncanson & Holt Syndicate Management Ltd. (United Kingdom)
                    Trafalgar Underwriting Agencies Ltd. (United Kingdom)

UNUM Japan Accident Insurance Company Limited (Japan)

UNUM (Bermuda) Holdings Ltd.

         Duncanson & Holt (Bermuda) Ltd.
         UNUM International Ltd. (Bermuda)
#### §§ 4287.181-4287.199 [Reserved]