alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2022241EN.01001601.xml

| 19.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 241/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 241/16

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 231 of 30 June 2021
  )

On page 467, Annex VII, ‘Table 5: Common and programme specific output indicators for the ERDF, the Cohesion Fund, the JTF and the EMFAF (point (b) of Article 42(2))’, second row:

for:

| ‘Data on output indicators from the programme
  [extracted from table 2 of point 2.1.1.1.2 of Annex V] | Progress in output indicators to date’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Data on output indicators from the programme

[extracted from table 2 of point 2.1.1.1.2 of Annex V]

Progress in output indicators to date’

read:

| ‘Data on output indicators from the programme
  [extracted from table 2 of point 2.1.1.1.2 of Annex V and table 2 of point 2.1.1.2.2. of Annex V] | Progress in output indicators to date’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Data on output indicators from the programme

[extracted from table 2 of point 2.1.1.1.2 of Annex V and table 2 of point 2.1.1.2.2. of Annex V]

Progress in output indicators to date’

---
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Kohlberg Capital
Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
(the “Report”), I, Michael I. Wirth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      March 16, 2009
                  
                  
                  
                  By:
                  
                  /
      S / Michael I.
      WirthMichael
      I. WirthChief
      Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer(Principal
      Financial
Officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of EMTA Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
      capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:
              August 14,
              2007By:
            /s/
              James C. MarshallName:James
                C. MarshallTitle:       
                Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
      statement required by Section 906, has been provided to EMTA Holdings, Inc.
      and will be retained by EMTA Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Joseph Harvey, Appellant, v Frank X. Gargiulo et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Frank Payne, Respondent.

In a proceeding, *inter alia,*to validate a petition designating Joseph Harvey as a candidate in the Liberal Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1980 for the public office of Member of the Assembly from the 32nd Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 18, 1980, which, *inter alia,*dismissed the proceeding. By order dated August 26, 1980 this court remanded the matter to Special Term to make appropriate specific findings of fact with respect to its invalidation of appellant’s designating petition and held the appeal in abeyance in the interim. Special Term has now complied. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The findings of fact are sufficient to sustain Special Term’s determination. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Mangano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
4.1403 Contract clause.       (a)                    						            Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards, in all solicitations and contracts of $30,000 or more.                                          (b)                    						            The clause is not prescribed for contracts that are not required to be reported in the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) (see subpart  4.6).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 4.14 - Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 5:01cr4-RH/WCS

TRAVIS WORKS,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER CLARIFYING PROCEDURES

Defendant Travis Works filed a pro se motion for a sentence reduction under

United States Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 706. The government

responded, acknowledging that a reduction is authorized.

Later, as part of the processing of more than 100 sentences potentially

affected by Amendment 706, I entered an order on August 15, 2008, noting that

Mr. Works might qualify for a reduction, and setting procedures for consideration

of any reduction. The August 15 order directed the government to file a response

by October 1, 2008.

The matter could have been considered on the pro se motion and the

government’s response without the entry of the August 15 order. Now, however,

Case 5:01-cr-00004-RH Document 35 Filed 08/25/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 5:01cr4-RH

because either side may have determined to make a further filing in accordance

with the August 15 order, the schedule established by that order will remain in

place. Even so, the government will be allowed to stand on its original response to

the pro se motion; the government need not file anything further.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The order entered August 15, 2008, remains in effect, except that paragraph

1 on page 6 of that order is amended to provide that the government “may,” instead

of “must,” file a memorandum by October 1, 2008. 

SO ORDERED on August 25, 2008.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 5:01-cr-00004-RH Document 35 Filed 08/25/08 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
TERRATECH INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER
28, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                          68,733
<SECURITIES>                                    28,426
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,022
<INVENTORY>                                      3,425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               189,590
<PP&E>                                         132,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 410,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,797
<BONDS>                                        191,671
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,828
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   410,635
<SALES>                                         11,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,887
<CGS>                                            9,620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,092
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   574
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   388
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,570
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,940
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,908
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,908
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
159 So.2d 289

#### NATIONAL CRANKSHAFT COMPANY v. NATURAL GAS INDUSTRIES, INC., James H. Hoag, Liquidator and James H. Hoag, Individually, in solido.

No. 47035.

Jan. 20, 1964.

Court of Appeal, Second Circuit.

158 So.2d 370.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### In re COONEY’S WILL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 10, 1906.)

In the matter of the probate of the last will and testament of Johanna Cooney, deceased.

No opinion. Decree of Surrogate’s Court affirmed, with costs, .on the opinion in same case on former appeal, reported in 112 App. Div. 659, 98 N. Y. Supp. 676.
#### In the Matter of Robert D. Young, Appellant, v State Board for Ophthalmic Dispensing, Division of Professional Licensing Services, et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered August 28, 1979 in Albany County, which dismissed a proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the State Board for Ophthalmic Dispensing which refused to sustain petitioner’s challenges to two questions on the June, 1978 licensing examination. The petitioner sought to compel the respondents to accept his answers to two particular multiple choice questions on a licensing examination. The appropriate standard was stated by Special Term, as follows: "In determining the rationality of the Board’s determination, the court is mindful that the petitioner does not have to show that there is no reasonable basis for the Board’s answer but merely has to show that his answers are better or at least as good *([Matter of] Acosta v Lang,*13 NY2d [1079]).” While the petitioner did raise some question in his papers as to the correct answers, the affidavit submitted on behalf of respondents as to the correctness of the answers selected establishes that petitioner failed to carry his burden of proof. There was nothing to indicate that a hearing would be of any practical assistance to Special Term and, accordingly, the assertion of petitioner that a hearing should have been held is erroneous (see *Matter of O’Brien v Commissioner of Educ. of State of N. Y.,*3 AD2d 321, 325). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
---

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ian S. Grant, President, Secretary and
Treasurer of Raven Biofuels International Corporation, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Raven Biofuels
International Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the 'Report')
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Raven Biofuels International Corporation

Dated: April 11, 2008

| | /s/
      Ian S. Grant                  
| | ----------------------------------------
| | Ian S. Grant                            
| | President, Secretary and Treasurer,     
| | Raven Biofuels International Corporation

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Raven Biofuels
International Corporation and will be retained by Raven Biofuels International
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
#### § 4284.100 OMB control number.

The information collection requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and have been assigned OMB control number 0570-0045.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Cecil Dominique, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, *Respondent.*

*Per Curiam.*

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 10, 1967, which, upon reopening and reconsideration, adhered to its original *719decision, filed January 24, 1967, disqualifying claimant from unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause by provoking his discharge. Whether claimant’s conduct constituted a voluntary leaving of employment without good cause by provoking his discharge is a factual determination for the board (Labor Law, § 623, *Matter of Fishbein [Catherwood],*28 A D 2d 1059; *Matter of Bartels [Catherwood],*28 A D 2d 1018; *Matter of Monahan [Catherwood],*27 A D 2d 781), issues of credibility regarding the alleged disruptive conduct of claimant during employment being in the sole province of the board *(Matter of Gadson [Catherwood],*28 A D 2d 1049; *Matter of Golia [Catherwood],*27 A D 2d 594). The board had a right to find from the testimony, although disputed, that claimant’s outward, persistent and offensive behavior during employment was such that one could reasonably anticipate would lead to intolerable disruption, great business loss and eventual termination of the work relation, amounting to an election not to meet a condition of the work, and that claimant became separated from his employment by his own choice (cf. *Matter of Gadson [Catherwood], supra; Matter of Socol [Catherwood],*29 A D 2d 1020; *Matter of MacDevitt [Catherwood],*29 A D 2d 588; *Matter of Irizarry [Catherwood],*28 A D 2d 765; *Matter of Lewis [Catherwood],*25 A D 2d 473; *Matter of Gorman [Catherwood],*17 A D 2d 885; *Matter of Malaspina [Corsi],*285 App. Div. 564, affd. 309 N. Y. 413). It was warranted in concluding that claimant *“*deliberately engaged in a course of conduct calculated to result in his discharge from the job ”. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Cooke and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum *Per Curiam.*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Craig J. Kaufmann, Controller and Treasurer of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    CRAIG J. KAUFMANNName:

Craig J. KaufmannTitle:

Controller and Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer)Date:

August 9, 2006
Exhibit 10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
  
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORNERSTONE REALTY INCOME 
  
 TRUST, INC. AND STANLEY J. OLANDER, JR. 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT, dated September 21, 2004, to the Employment Agreement between Cornerstone Realty Income Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) and Stanley
J. Olander, Jr. (the “Executive”). The Company and the Executive entered into an Employment Agreement as of October 1, 2001. Pursuant to Section 15 of the Employment Agreement, the Company and the Executive have the power to amend the
Employment Agreement and now wish to do so. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE,
effective September 21, 2004, except as otherwise provided, the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
  
 I. Section 14 of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the remaining Section of the Employment Agreement is renumbered accordingly.

  
 II. Wherever a provision of this Amendment causes a change in
any internal cross-reference to any Section or subsection of the Employment Agreement, such cross-reference shall be updated accordingly. 
  
 III. In all respects not amended, the Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Employee have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the
dates set forth below. 
  

	
	CORNERSTONE REALTY INCOME TRUST, INC.
	
	 /s/ Glade M. Knight


	GLADE M. KNIGHT
	
	Title:    CEO
	
	Date:    9/21/04
	
	 /s/ Stanley J. Olander, Jr.


	STANLEY J. OLANDER, JR.
	
	Date:    9/21/04


  

 -2-
Incorporation by Reference Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0764 January 21, 2016

The contents of the following dockets are he reby incorporated by re ference into and are considered to be included in, contained in and to have been placed in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR2015-0764 (Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule: Leak Detection Methodology Revisions and Confidentiality Determinations for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems):

1) EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0508 (Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting) 2) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923 (Oil and Natural Gas Systems) 3) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0924 (Determination of C onfidential Business Information) 4) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0925 (Corporate Parent an d NAICS Code in the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule) 5) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0926 (Carbon Dioxide Injec tion and Geologic Sequestration) 6) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0927 (Additional Sour ces of Fluorinated Gases) 7) EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0929 (Change to the Reporti ng Date for Certain Data Elements Required Under the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule) 8) EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0147 (Minor Technical Co rrections and Amendments to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rules) 9) EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0417 (Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems, Subpart W: Extension of 2011 BAMM Deadlines) 10) EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0512 (Technical Revisions fo r Subpart I and W of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule) 11) EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0831 (Greenhouse Gas Repor ting Program Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems 2015 Revisions)

Accessing dockets: Publicly available docket materials ar e available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Docket, EPA/ DC, WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC . This Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, ex cluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, a nd the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 5:03cr37-RH/WCS

MICHAEL J. SHERROD,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER REDUCING SENTENCE

The term of imprisonment to which defendant Michael J. Sherrod is

sentenced is hereby reduced to a term of fifty-four (54) months on count one,

which, together with the existing consecutive sentence of twelve (12) months on

count five, results in a combined sentence of sixty-six (66) months. In all other

respects the original sentence remains unchanged.

SO ORDERED this 27th day of November, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 5:03-cr-00037-RH-WCS Document 84 Filed 11/27/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the year ended May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Minhong Yu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 23, 2008



By:

/s/     Michael Minhong YuName:

Michael Minhong YuTitle:

Chief Executive Officer