alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### L. F. Rothschild, Unterberg, Towbin, Appellant, v Robert Thompson, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 26, 1979, and judgment entered December 27,1979, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs and disbursements, the motion to dismiss the complaint denied, and the judgment vacated. This is an action by a stockbroker to recover some $17,000 from a customer whose transactions resulted in a negative account balance. The stockbroker is a New York firm licensed to do business in Alabama. The defendant is an Alabaman businessman, who dealt directly with the plaintiff-appellant in New York, and did so only by telephone and mail. While the defendant-respondent never came to New York, he sent checks and securities and his agreement covering his arrangement with the plaintiff-appellant to New York. His “option agreement” provided that New York law would apply. There were some 25 transactions in four months. The court at Special Term confirmed the report of the Referee to the effect that jurisdiction had not been acquired in New York. We believe that there was sufficient “purposeful activity within the state so as to confer jurisdiction upon our courts under section 302, CPLR.” *(Hirschler v American Securities Co., S. A.,*NYLJ, Jan. 10,1972, p 17, col 2; see, also, *Ehrlich-Bober & Co. v University of Houston,*49 NY2d 574.) Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Ross, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
Execution Copy

 

Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I, Ltd.

Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P.

Harbinger Capital Partners Fund I, L.P.

Harbinger Co-Investment Fund, L.P.

555 Madison Avenue, 16th Floor

New York, New York 10022

 

September 16, 2008

 

SkyTerra Communications, Inc.

10802 Parkridge Boulevard

Reston, Virginia 20191

Attention: General Counsel

 

Gentlemen:

 

Reference is made to that certain Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Harbinger Purchase Agreement”), dated as of September 12, 2008, by and among Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I, Ltd. (“Harbinger Master”), Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P. (“Harbinger Special” and, together with Harbinger Master, “Harbinger”) and Motient Ventures Holding Inc. (“Motient”), pursuant to which Harbinger purchased from Motient 23,376,074 shares (the “Purchased Shares”) of the non-voting common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the“Non-Voting Common Stock”) of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. (the “Company”).

Reference is also made to that certain Letter Agreement (the “Initial Letter Agreement”), dated as of September 12, 2008, by and among Harbinger and the Company, pursuant to which the Company (i) agreed to exchange the Purchased Shares for shares of Voting Common Stock (as hereinafter defined), (ii) agreed to amend the Registration Rights Agreement (as hereinafter defined) to include the Purchased Shares in the definition of ‘Registrable Shares’, and (iii) consented to the purchase of the Purchased Shares by Harbinger pursuant to the Harbinger Purchase Agreement.

Reference is also made to that certain Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), dated as of July 24, 2008 and as may be amended from time to time, by and among Harbinger Master, Harbinger Special, Harbinger Co-Investment Fund, L.P. (“Satellite Fund”), Harbinger Capital Partners Fund I, L.P. (“Capital Fund” and, collectively with Harbinger and Satellite Fund, the “Securityholders”) and the Company, pursuant to which the Company has granted the Securityholders certain registration rights with respect to certain securities issued or to be issued by the Company.

Further reference is made to that certain Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”), dated as of May 6, 2006, by and among TerreStar Corporation (f/k/a Motient Corporation) (“TerreStar”), Motient and the Company  pursuant to which the Company purchased from Motient 9,034,848.51 limited partnership units of Mobile Satellite Ventures, LP (“MSV”) and 1,572.11 shares of common stock of Mobile Satellite Ventures GP, Inc. in exchange for 25,478,273 shares of the Company’s Non-Voting Common Stock exchangeable in 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29676]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Approval of Camin Cargo Control, Inc., as a Commercial Gauger

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of approval of Camin Cargo Control, Inc., as a 
commercial gauger.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, Camin 
Cargo Control, Inc., 73 Castle Coakely, Unit 3, Christiansted, St. 
Croix, VI 00821, has been approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum 
products for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 
CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct gauger 
services should request and receive written assurances from the entity 
that it is approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 
conduct the specific gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires 
regarding the specific gauger service this entity is approved to 
perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by 
calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#355657451b5954575d4475515d461b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93f0f1e3bdfff2f1fbe2d3f7fbe0bdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.

http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The approval of Camin Cargo Control, Inc., as commercial gauger 
became effective on August 9, 2010. The next triennial inspection date 
will be scheduled for August 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: November 16, 2010.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-29676 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 5001.206 Compliance with USDA Departmental Regulations, Policies, and other Federal laws. ( a ) *Departmental regulations.* All projects receiving a loan guarantee under this part are subject to the provisions of USDA's Departmental Regulations, as applicable.
( b ) *Other Federal laws.* Lenders and borrowers must comply with other applicable Federal laws including, but not limited to, Equal Employment Opportunities, Americans with Disabilities Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Fair Housing Act.
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 1 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 2 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 3 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 4 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 5 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 6 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 7 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 8 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 9 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 10 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 11 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 12 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 13 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 14 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 15 of 16
Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 120 Filed 05/12/22 Page 16 of 16
#### Harvey Alston, Jr., Respondent-Appellant, v. Constitution Realty Corporation, Appellant-Respondent, and North American Continental Company, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the Civil Court in favor of plaintiff, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, complaint dismissed and cross appeal dismissed as moot, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, on the dissenting opinion of Hecht, J., at Appellate Term. Concur—Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.
23.405 Procedures.

(a) Designated items and procurement guidelines.

(1) Recovered Materials. Contracting officers should refer to EPA’s list of EPA-designated items

(available via the Internet at

https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program#products) and to

their agencies’ affirmative procurement program when purchasing products that contain recovered

material, or services that could include the use of products that contain recovered material.

(2) Biobased products. Contracting officers should refer to USDA’s list of USDA-designated items

(available through the Internet at http://www.biopreferred.gov) and to their agencies affirmative

procurement program when purchasing supplies that contain biobased material or when purchasing

services that could include supplies that contain biobased material.

(3) When acquiring recovered material or biobased products, the contracting officer may request

information or data on such products, including recycled or biobased content or related standards of

the products (see 11.302(c)).

(b) Procurement exemptions.

(1) Once an item has been designated by either EPA or USDA, agencies shall purchase conforming

products unless an exemption applies (see 23.404(b)).

(2) When an exemption is used for an EPA-designated item or the procurement of a product

containing recovered material does not meet or exceed the EPA recovered material content

guidelines, the contracting officer shall place a written justification in the contract file.

(c) Program priorities. When both the USDA-designated item and the EPA-designated item will be

used for the same purposes, and both meet the agency’s needs, the agency shall purchase the EPAdesignated item.

Parent topic: Subpart 23.4 - Use of Recovered Materials and Biobased Products
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2449 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the age for receipt of 

military retired pay for nonregular service from 60 years of age to 

55 years of age. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16 (legislative day, MARCH 15), 2006 

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Mr. REID) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the age 

for receipt of military retired pay for nonregular service 

from 60 years of age to 55 years of age. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN AGE FOR RECEIPT OF MILITARY 

4 RETIRED PAY FOR NONREGULAR SERVICE. 

5 (a) REDUCTION IN AGE.—Section 12731(a)(1) of 

6 title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘at 

7 least 60 years of age’’ and inserting ‘‘at least 55 years 

8 of age’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2449 IS

1 (b) APPLICATION TO EXISTING PROVISIONS OF LAW

2 OR POLICY.—With respect to any provision of law, or of 

3 any policy, regulation, or directive of the executive branch 

4 that refers to a member or former member of the uni5 formed services as being eligible for, or entitled to, retired 

6 pay under chapter 1223 of title 10, United States Code, 

7 but for the fact that the member or former member is 

8 under 60 years of age, such provision shall be carried out 

9 with respect to that member or former member by sub10 stituting for the reference to being 60 years of age, a ref11 erence to the age in effect for qualification for such retired 

12 pay under section 12731(a) of title 10, United States 

13 Code, as amended by subsection (a). 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall take effect on the first day of the first 

16 month beginning on or after the date of the enactment 

17 of this Act and shall apply to retired pay payable for that 

18 month and subsequent months. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
# 19.811 Preparing the contracts.

- 19.811-1 Sole source. 
- 19.811-2 Competitive. 
- 19.811-3 Contract clauses. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 19.8 - Contracting with the Small Business Administration (The 8(a) Program)
§ 4284.920 Applicant eligibility. To be eligible for a grant under this subpart, an Applicant must demonstrate that they meet the requirements specified in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, as applicable, and are subject to the limitations specified in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section. ( a ) *Type of Applicant.* The Applicant, including any Federally-recognized Tribes and tribal entities (Rural Development State Offices and posted application guidelines will provide additional information on Tribal eligibility), must demonstrate that they meet all definition requirements for one of the following Applicant types: ( 1 ) An Independent Producer;
( 2 ) An Agricultural Producer Group;
( 3 ) A Farmer or Rancher Cooperative; or
( 4 ) A Majority-Controlled Producer-Based Business Venture.
( b ) *Emerging market.* An applicant that is an agricultural producer group, a farmer or rancher cooperative, or a majority-controlled producer-based business venture must demonstrate that they are entering into an emerging market as a result of the proposed project.
( c ) *Citizenship.* ( 1 ) Individual Applicants must certify that they: ( i ) Are citizens or nationals of the United States (U.S.), the Republic of Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, or American Samoa; or
( ii ) Reside in the U.S. after legal admittance for permanent residence.
( 2 ) Entities other than individuals must certify that they are more than 50 percent owned by individuals who are either citizens as identified under paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section or legally admitted permanent residents residing in the U.S.
( d ) *Legal authority and responsibility.* Each Applicant must demonstrate that they have, or can obtain, the legal authority necessary to carry out the purpose of the grant, and they must evidence good standing from the appropriate State agency or equivalent.
( e ) *Multiple grant eligibility.* An Applicant may submit only one application in response to a solicitation, and must explicitly direct that it compete in either the general funds competition or in one of the named reserved funds competitions. Multiple applications from separate entities with identical or greater than 75 percent common ownership, or from a parent, subsidiary or affiliated organization (with “affiliation” defined by Small Business Administration regulation 13 CFR 121.103, or successor regulation) are not permitted. Further, Applicants who have already received a Planning Grant for the proposed project cannot receive another Planning Grant for the same project. Applicants who have already received a Working Capital Grant for the proposed project cannot receive any additional grants for that project.
( f ) *Active VAPG grant.* If an Applicant has an active value-added grant at the time of a subsequent application, the currently active grant must be closed out within 90 days of the application submission deadline for the subsequent competition, as published in the annual solicitation.
OAO 247 (02/08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

United States of America )

)

)

)

)

)

v.

DUANE ROSHELL Case No: 3:95cr3089-015

USM No: 03842-017

Date of Previous Judgment: June 12, 1996 Thomas S. Keith, Assistant Federal Public Defender

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) Defendant’s Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of 9 the defendant 9 the Director of the Bureau of Prisons : the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

9 DENIED. X GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in 

the last judgment issued) of 324 months is reduced to 262 .

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: 40 Amended Offense Level: 38

Criminal History Category: II Criminal History Category: II

Previous Guideline Range: 324 to 405 months Amended Guideline Range: 262 to 327 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

X The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

9 The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time

of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the

amended guideline range.

9 Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated June 12, 1996 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: April 8, 2009 /s/ Roger Vinson

Judge’s signature

Effective Date: Roger Vinson, Senior U.S. District Judge

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

Case 3:95-cr-03089-RV Document 1254 Filed 04/08/09 Page 1 of 1
§ 500.8 Soliciting, vending, debt collection, and distribution of handbills. ( a ) The following activities are prohibited on USNA grounds: ( 1 ) Soliciting of alms or contributions;
( 2 ) Display or distribution of commercial advertising;
( 3 ) Collecting private debts;
( 4 ) Campaigning for election to any office;
( 5 ) Soliciting and vending for commercial purposes (including, but not limited to, the vending of newspapers and other publications);
( 6 ) Soliciting signatures on petitions, polls, or surveys (except as authorized by the USNA); and
( 7 ) Impeding ingress to or egress from the USNA.
( b ) Distribution to USNA general public visitors of material such as pamphlets, handbills, and flyers is prohibited without prior approval of the Director, USNA.
( c ) The prohibitions in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section do not apply to: ( 1 ) Commercial or nonprofit activities performed under contract or concession with the USNA or pursuant to the provisions of the Randolph Sheppard Act;
( 2 ) The solicitation of USNA personnel for contributions for the Combined Federal Campaign (CFC);
( 3 ) National or local drives for funds for welfare, health, and other purposes sponsored or approved by the Agricultural Research Service; or
( 4 ) Personal notices posted by employees on authorized bulletin boards.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KIMBERLY GRIPPA,

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No.: 4:20cv457-MW/MAF

RONALD RUBIN,

Defendant.

__________________________/

ORDER GRANTING STAY AND EXTENSION

This Court has considered, without hearing, Plaintiff’s motion to stay, ECF 

No. 112, and Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time, ECF No. 113. Defendant

opposes both motions, arguing that Plaintiff filed her motions too late and that 

granting a stay would be futile as the documents Plaintiff seeks from Seth Gordon 

have no bearing on this case. ECF No. 114. Plaintiff, pursuant to this Court’s 

directive, ECF No. 115, filed a reply arguing that the Gordon documents are highly 

relevant to her claims. ECF No. 116.

Upon reading the parties’ thoughtful arguments, this Court has determined 

that the Gordon documents likely have some relevance to the instant case and 

granting a stay would not be futile. Moreover, the only delay in this case resulted 

from this Court’s own error. This Court has a “strong preference for deciding cases 

on the merits—not based on a single missed deadline—whenever reasonably 

Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 117 Filed 03/11/22 Page 1 of 2
2

possible.” Perez v. Wells Fargo N.A., 774 F.3d 1329, 1332 (11th Cir. 2014). This 

Court is responsible for the delay, and the parties should not be prejudiced as a result. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to stay, ECF No. 112, and Plaintiff’s motion for 

extension of time, ECF No. 113, are GRANTED. This case is stayed pending a 

ruling from the Southern District of Florida on Plaintiff’s motion to compel. Plaintiff 

shall file her response to Defendant’s pending motion for summary judgment within 

ten days of the Southern District’s order. 

SO ORDERED on March 11, 2022.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 117 Filed 03/11/22 Page 2 of 2
§ 51.1153 Size. ( a ) Fruits shall be fairly uniform in size and shall be packed in containers according to approved and recognized methods.
( b ) “Fairly uniform in size” means that not more than 10 percent of the oranges per sample may vary more than one-half inch in diameter.
( c ) In order to allow for variations incident to proper sizing, not more than 10 percent of the samples in any lot may fail to meet the requirements of size.
# L_2013310EN.01000301.xml

| 20.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 310/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 310/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1169/2013

of 7 November 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Maçã Riscadinha de Palmela (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1151/2012, Portugal’s application to register the name ‘Maçã Riscadinha de Palmela’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1151/2012, Portugal’s application to register the name ‘Maçã Riscadinha de Palmela’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EC) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Maçã Riscadinha de Palmela’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EC) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Maçã Riscadinha de Palmela’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 November 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 85, 23.3.2013, p. 16.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

PORTUGAL

Maçã Riscadinha de Palmela (PDO)

---
THE NATIONWIDE STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING WATER-QUALITY MONITORING         IN THE UNITED STATES