alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DUSTIN H. RAKER,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv335–WS/HTC

THE STATE OF FLORIDA,

et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 10) docketed August 25, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that the

plaintiff's complaint and this case be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A 

based on the plaintiff's failure to disclose his complete prior litigation history. The

plaintiff has filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

Having reviewed the record, this court has determined that the magistrate

judge’s report and recommendation is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

Case 4:20-cv-00335-WS-HTC Document 13 Filed 10/07/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 10) is

ADOPTED and incorporated into this order by reference.

2. The plaintiff’s complaint and this action are DISMISSED without

prejudice as malicious for abuse of the judicial process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915A, and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “All claims are dismissed without

prejudice.”

4. The clerk shall close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of October , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00335-WS-HTC Document 13 Filed 10/07/20 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Silver Pearl Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  October 19, 2007



/s/ Denise Smith



Name: Denise Smith

Title:  Chief Executive Officer







Dated:  October 19, 2007



/s/ Denise Smith



Name: Denise Smith

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
i- - >

Texts &*^/ «*? L^i^t

J I ''Sfe/s

APR 01 2015 Wtim? tlfiiWHpPEALS

7$ Thk&S*,^ r // /? y. APR 012015 '1/5 ^t>r,om6fe 6^/-<//>bel Acosta, Clerk

1« /2W .^st a/p/«./ S^cj 6JL re^mf^

MM dyS UM^T keeled 4 tutie&rj

"Tr-7. /J ^ i \ / / /
#### § 3550.7 Demonstration programs.

From time to time, RHS may authorize limited demonstration programs. The purpose of these demonstration programs is to test new approaches to offering housing under the statutory authority granted to the Secretary. Therefore, such demonstration programs may not be consistent with some of the provisions contained in this part. However, any program requirements that are statutory will remain in effect. Demonstration programs will be clearly identified as such.
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 10-0224 Focus Ready Draft 3/11/2010 ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ CLM PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER: USE: OTHER USES: MSDS: Label: No Gen Eqpt: Respirator: Health Effects: TLV/PEL:

CRSS : Chemical Name: S-H20: 1 g/L @ VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ MW: %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:Consumer Use: SAT (concerns) (03/02/2010):

Migration to groundwater: Anion rapid; Cation moderate PBT rating: P3B1T2 Anion: P3B1T2 // Cation: P1B1T1 Health: 2 Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 1 No releases to Water OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: P2 Claims:EXPOSURE -BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 10-0224 Use: Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation: Dermal:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS AND NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: #'S 2 AND 4, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,705
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                       699
<INVENTORY>                                     38,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,006
<PP&E>                                          40,807
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,554
<BONDS>                                         32,562
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,992
<SALES>                                        124,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,185
<CGS>                                          120,902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  120,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,195
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   391
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,822)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,221)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,601)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,858
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,743)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.24)


</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1168

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

THIRD DIMENSION (3D) SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maine

in case no. 08-CV-158, Judge D. Brock Hornby.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Third Dimension Semiconductor, Inc. (3D) moves to stay proceedings due to

settlement efforts. 3D states that Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation consents.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted to the extent that Fairchild's brief is due within 60

days of the date of filing of this order.

The motion for judicial notice remains in abeyance.

FOR THE COURT

MAY 21 2009	

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Date	 Jan Horbaly

Clerk	PILED

cc:	Robert H. Stier, Jr., Esq.	

US. eaVRTDP APPEALS PON

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT Michael W. Shore, Esq.

s17	 MAY 21 2009

JAN HOiitskthi

CLERK
§ 51.1904 Maturity classification. Tomatoes which are characteristically red when ripe, but are not overripe or soft, may be classified for maturity as follows: ( a ) Turning, when at least some part of the surface of the tomato, but less than one-half of the surface in the aggregate, is covered with pink color.
( b ) Pink, when the tomato shows from one-half to three-fourths of the surface in the aggregate covered with pink or red color.
( c ) Hard ripe, when the tomato shows three-fourths or more of the surface in the aggregate covered with pink or red color.
( d ) Firm ripe, when the tomato shows three-fourths or more of the surface in the aggregate covered with red color characteristic of reasonably well ripened tomatoes.
( e ) Incident to proper maturity determination, not more than a total of 10 percent, by count, of the tomatoes in any lot may fail to meet the maturity specified: *Provided,* That not more than 5 percent shall be allowed for tomatoes which are immature or are overripe or soft.
EXHIBIT 32

     CERTIFICATIONS OF JOSEPH R. ROZELLE, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
       PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VPGI Corp. (the
 "Company") for  the period  ended  September 30, 2006,  as  filed  with  the
 Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, the
 undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to  18 U.S.C. S1350,
 as adopted pursuant to S906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to  the
 best of my knowledge:

      1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information contained in  the Report fairly  presents, in  all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the
 Company.


 Date:  November 14, 2006      /s/    JOSEPH R. ROZELLE
                               -------------------------------
                               JOSEPH R. ROZELLE
                               Chief Executive Officer
                               and Principal Financial Officer


 The foregoing certification is being furnished  as  an  exhibit to the  Form
 10-Q pursuant to Item  601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section  906 of  the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed  as
 part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities  Exchange
 Act of  1934, as  amended, and  is not  incorporated by  reference into  any
 filings of  the Company,  whether  made before  or  after the  date  hereof,
 regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Case 1:02-cr-00038-MP-AK   Document 197   Filed 04/23/08   Page 1 of 1
6 - 1

CHAPTER 6

LONG RANGE NAVIGATIONAL AIDS

PART I LORAN-C

600A. General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

600B. Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

600C. Receivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

600D. Station List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

PART II SATELLITE NAVIGATION

610A. General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

610B. GPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

610C. DGPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

610D. GLONASS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Notes: Greater detail on the theory, principles, and operation of long range navigational aids may be found i

American Practical Navigator (Bowditch)(NVPUB9).

5.0The U.S. Naval Observatory Website provides LORAN-C and GPS user information and data at:

5.0http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/gps.html

5.0The U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website provides Loran-C, GPS, DGPS and g

radionavigation user information and status at:

5.0http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/

5.0http://www.navcenter.org (Mirror site)

5.0GPS status is also broadcast from WWV and WWVH (See sec. 200H.).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Curtis Jackson, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on November 17, 1978, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Concur — Birns, J. P., Fein, Markewich, Lupiano and Ross, JJ.
§ 51.1307 Application of tolerances. ( a ) The contents of individual packages in the lot, based on sample inspection, are subject to the following limitations, provided the averages for the entire lot are within the tolerances specified for the grade: ( 1 ) For packages which contain more than 10 pounds, and a tolerance of 10 percent or more is provided, individual packages in any lot shall have not more than one and one-half times the tolerance specified. For packages which contain more than 10 pounds and a tolerance of less than 10 percent is provided, individual packages in any lot shall have not more than double the tolerance specified, except that at least one pear which is seriously damaged by insects or affected by decay or internal breakdown may be permitted in any package.
( 2 ) For packages which contain 10 pounds or less, individual packages in any lot are not restricted as to the percentage of defects or off-size: *Provided,* That not more than four times the tolerance specified may be permitted in any package for pears which are seriously damaged by insects or affected by decay or internal breakdown except that at least one defective pear may be permitted in any package.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs

HOWARD SILVER

Case No.4:03cr47-RH

ORDER

Your documents, LETTERS (received 10/13/05, 10/14/05 and 10/17/05), were referred to the

undersigned with the following deficiencies:

The document does not have a Certificate of Service as required by Rule 5(b) and

(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, showing that you provided a copy to

the attorney for the government.

Your document is not properly captioned for this court. Every paper you file after

the complaint must have the name of this court, the case style, the case number

and the title of your pleading. The body of your document should state succinctly

the nature of your request and what you want the court to do for you.

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:

The document shall remain in the electronic file, but the court will not consider it until

you have corrected the above deficiencies through the filing of a corrected document, and

no further papers will be accepted unless they comply with NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

FLORIDA local rules.

SO ORDERED this 19th day of October, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:03-cr-00047-RH-WCS Document 119 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 1
Rev 0 (9/08) 

## Com **ments i**  **n Response to “**  **Final r**  **ule; r**  **equest for c**  **om ments**  **”**
**Docket: FAA**  **- 20**  **11 -**  **0573 -**  **Directorate Identifier 2011**  **- NM**  **- 082**  **- AD**  Comments have been received in response to : **“ Final rule** **; request for comments,”** Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. (Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted. Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, if necessary. Then **include your name and**  **the date**  in the spaces provided, and return it to the AD directorate focal.
Th e FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we re ceived from: Virgin America on July

07, 2011 and Delta Airlines on July 28, 2011. Both comments were regarding clarification on definition of "new" part in paragraph (m) o f AD. The FAA clarified that intent of "new" includes new or servceable units. **(Please check on**  **e**

**)** These comments **have not** been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration or change of this AD. The se comments **have** been found to contain information that warrants consideration of additional regulatory

action. 

### (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual **FAA -**  **IR -**  **M -**  **8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)**

______ Sanjay

Ralhan

_____ 08/18/11

__ Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                   QUIPP, INC.

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
          REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
                       OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

     I, Michael S. Kady, Chief Executive Officer of Quipp, Inc., a Florida
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

    (1) The Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
        2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

                                      * * *

                                                         Michael S. Kady
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         MICHAEL S. KADY
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 25, 2004
> 
Exhibit

32.1

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS

ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE

SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Entremetrix Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three-month period ending March 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), I, Richard R. McKinley, Chief Executive Officer andInterim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:
-  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Dated:May 17, 2004                                                    By:  /s/ Richard R. McKinley                                           
                                                                                           RichardR. McKinley, President and Interim CFO
#### In the Matter of Merline McIntosh, Respondent, v Borough of Manhattan Community College et al., Appellants.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 21, 1980, directing the respondents to give petitioner a passing grade and a nursing degree, unanimously reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed, without costs. Respondent Borough of Manhattan Community College (college) has an educational policy that any student, who fails “Nursing 410” on two occasions, will not receive a nursing degree. Petitioner McIntosh failed that course twice. The passing grade for that course was 70.00; petitioner received a failing mark of 69.713 upon her second enrollment. At Special Term, petitioner, sought to show that two of her answers on the final examination were as correct or more correct than the designated answers. Alternatively, petitioner asked that her final mark be “rounded off’ to a passing grade of70.00. Special Term found that it was arbitrary and capricious for the petitioner’s instructor to fail a graduating senior by a score of .287. That court did not reach the issue of whether the petitioner’s two answers were as correct or more correct than the designated answers. Generally, the courts may not interfere with the administrative discretion exercised by an educational institution unless the circumstances disclosed by a record leave no scope for the use of that discretion in the manner under scrutiny. *(Matter of Lesser v Board of Educ.,*18 AD2d 388, 390.) This judicial reluctance to intervene encompasses controversies involving academic standards. This policy of judicial restraint is founded upon sound considerations of public policy. When an educational institution issues a diploma to one of its students, it is, in effect, certifying to society that the student possesses all of the knowledge and skills that are required by the chosen discipline. An educational institution is not required to confer a diploma before the student has demonstrated competence in accordance with the institution’s academic standards *(Matter of Olsson v Board of Higher Educ.,*49 NY2d 408, 413, 414). In accordance with this principle, we find no reason to substitute our opinion for the college’s policy that no student should receive a nursing degree unless the student passes “Nursing 410”. Likewise, we do not take it upon ourselves to “round off’ the petitioner’s failing mark since the college has no policy to support such action. Upon this appeal, petitioner has made no attempt to demonstrate that her two answers were as correct or more correct than the designated answers. Consequently, we cannot grant her any relief on that basis. Petitioner is still free to enroll in the external degree program maintained by the Board of Regents or to take an equivalent program. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Fein, Ross, Bloom and Carro, JJ.