alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:88-cr-01007-MP-AK-3

RUFUS C ROCHELL,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1414, Motion for Relief Pursuant to Old Law

Rule 35(a) by Rufus C Rochell. Defendant moves the Court to modify his sentence, pursuant to

the old version of Rule 35(a), which is applicable to offenses committed prior to November 1,

1987. This rule as in effect prior to amendment by Pub. L. 98-473 read as follows: “The court

may correct an illegal sentence at any time and may correct a sentence imposed in an illegal

manner within the time provided herein for the reduction of sentence.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a)

(1987). This motion, which attacks the sentence imposed by this Court, is construed as a § 2255

motion. Defendant was previously denied collateral relief on the merits of his § 2255 motion,

and therefore he is barred from seeking such relief in this Court absent prior certification from

the Eleventh Circuit. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h), 2244(b)(3). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Case 1:88-cr-01007-MW-GRJ Document 1415 Filed 09/07/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. Motion to modify sentence, Doc. 1414, is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of September, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:88-cr-01007-MP-AK-3

Case 1:88-cr-01007-MW-GRJ Document 1415 Filed 09/07/11 Page 2 of 2
23.506 Suspension of payments, termination of contract, and debarment and suspension actions.       (a) 						            After determining in writing that adequate evidence to suspect any of the causes at paragraph (d) of this section exists, the contracting officer may suspend contract payments in accordance with the procedures at 32.503-6(a)(1).                                          (b) 						            After determining in writing that any of the causes at paragraph (d) of this section exist, the contracting officer may terminate the contract for default.                                          (c) 						            Upon initiating action under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, the contracting officer shall refer the case to the agency suspension and debarment official, in accordance with agency procedures, pursuant to subpart  9.4.                                          (d) 						            The specific causes for suspension of contract payments, termination of a contract for default, or suspension and debarment are-                                                         (1) 								                The contractor has failed to comply with the requirements of the clause at 52.223-6, Drug-Free Workplace; or                                                            (2) 								                The number of contractor employees convicted of violations of criminal drug statutes occurring in the workplace indicates that the contractor has failed to make a good faith effort to provide a drug-free workplace.                                                                             (e) 						            A determination under this section to suspend contract payments, terminate a contract for default, or debar or suspend a contractor may be waived by the agency head for a particular contract, in accordance with agency procedures, only if such waiver is necessary to prevent a severe disruption of the agency operation to the detriment of the Federal Government or the general public (see subpart  9.4). The waiver authority of the agency head cannot be delegated.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 23.5 - Drug-Free Workplace
22.603 Applicability.

The requirements in 22.602 apply to contracts (including for this purpose, indefinite-delivery

contracts, basic ordering agreements, and blanket purchase agreements) and subcontracts under

Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act, for the manufacture or furnishing of supplies that-

(a) Will be performed in the United States, Puerto Rico, or the U.S. Virgin Islands;

(b) Exceed or may exceed $15,000; and

(c) Are not exempt under 22.604.

Parent topic: Subpart 22.6 - Contracts for Materials, Supplies, Articles, and Equipment
Case 1:19-cv-00200-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 10/17/19 Page 1 of 1
#### § 3560.628 Establishing and modifying rental charges.

If it becomes necessary to establish or modify a shelter cost, the borrower must obtain Agency approval as specified in subpart E of this part.
3.907-7 	Contract clause.       Use the clause at 52.203-15, Whistleblower Protections Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, in all solicitations and contracts funded in whole or in part with Recovery Act funds.    **Parent topic:** 3.907 Whistleblower Protections Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act).
4.904 Reporting payment information to the

IRS.

26 U.S.C. 6041 and 6041 A, as implemented in 26 CFR, in part, require payors, including

Government agencies, to report to the IRS, on Form 1099, payments made to certain contractors. 26

U.S.C. 6109 requires a contractor to provide its TIN if a Form 1099 is required. The payment office

is responsible for submitting reports to the IRS.

Parent topic: Subpart 4.9 - Taxpayer Identification Number Information
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1606
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1614
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              235
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1614
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   223
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (78)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (78)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (78)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 3550.112 Maximum loan and grant. ( a ) *Maximum loan permitted.* The sum of all outstanding section 504 loans to one household for one dwelling may not exceed an amount determined by the Agency based on factors such as average loan amounts and repair costs, but no greater than twenty percent of the national average area loan limit. ( 1 ) Transferees who have assumed a section 504 loan and wish to obtain a subsequent section 504 loan are limited to the difference between the unpaid principal balance of the debt assumed and the maximum loan permitted.
( 2 ) For a secured loan, the total of all debts on the secured property may not exceed the value of the security, except by the amount of any required appraisal and tax monitoring fees, and the contributions to an escrow account for taxes and insurance.
( b ) *Maximum loan based upon ability to pay.* The maximum loan is limited to the principal balance that can be supported given the amount the applicant has available, as determined by RHS, to repay a loan at 1 percent interest with a 20-year term.
( c ) *Maximum grant.* The lifetime total of the grant assistance to any one household or one dwelling may not exceed ten percent of the national average area loan limit.
[61 FR 59779, Nov. 22, 1996, as amended at 87 FR 6772, Feb. 7, 2022]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TEVIN THOMAS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 609 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of June, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Willie Bell, appellee, v. City of Chicago, appellant.

Gen. No. 37,483.

Opinion filed October 16, 1934.

William H. Sexton, Corporation Counsel, and Alexander M. Smietanka, City Attorney, for appellant; Quin O’Brien and James Dana-her, Assistant Corporation Counsel, and Lionel J. Berc, Assistant City Attorney, of counsel. Augustine J. Bowe and William J. Bowe, for appellee; John D. Casey, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 4279.205 Prohibition under Agency programs. ( a ) No loan guaranteed by the Agency under this subpart will be conditioned on any requirement that the recipient(s) of such assistance accept or receive electric service from any particular utility, supplier, or cooperative.
( b ) No loan guaranteed by the Agency may be made with the proceeds of any obligation the Interest on which is excludable from income under 26 U.S.C. 103 or a successor statute. Funds generated through the issuance of tax-exempt obligations may neither be used to purchase the guaranteed portion of any Agency guaranteed loan nor may an Agency guaranteed loan serve as Collateral for a tax-exempt issue. The Agency may guarantee a loan for a Project which involves tax-exempt financing only when the guaranteed loan funds are used to finance a part of the Project that is separate and distinct from the part which is financed by the tax-exempt obligation, and the guaranteed loan has at least a Parity security position with the tax-exempt obligation.
( c ) The Agency may not issue a guarantee for a loan where there may be, directly or indirectly, a Conflict of Interest or an appearance of a Conflict of Interest involving any action by the Agency.
( d ) The Agency may not guarantee lease payments.
( e ) The Agency may not guarantee loans made by other Federal agencies.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:94-cr-01009-MP-AK-2

CLAUDE LOUIS DUBOC,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1168, Motion for Reconsideration by Claude

Louise Duboc. On August 22, 2011, the government submitted a motion to amend the order of

forfeiture of the assets belonging to defendant, Claude Louis Duboc. On September 12, 2011,

the Court granted the government's motion to amend the order of forfeiture. On September 27,

2011, defendant filed a motion for enlargement of time to respond to the government’s motion to

amend the order of forfeiture, which the Court denied. 

Defendant now moves the Court for reconsideration of its order denying him an

enlargement of time to respond to the government’s motion. Defendant states that he did not

receive a complete copy of the government’s motion until September 19, 2011, which was after

the deadline to timely respond. Upon reconsideration, the Court will allow defendant to file a

response out of time. However, the Court will not vacate or stay the final order of forfeiture at

this time but will consider defendant’s response when filed. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Defendant’s motion for reconsideration, Doc. 1168, is GRANTED.

Case 1:94-cr-01009-MP-GRJ Document 1169 Filed 10/21/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. Defendant may respond to the government’s motion to amend the order of

forfeiture on or before November 11, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:94-cr-01009-MP-AK-1

Case 1:94-cr-01009-MP-GRJ Document 1169 Filed 10/21/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WAYNE LOBBAN,

Petitioner,

v. 4:03cv325-WS

GOVERNOR JEB BUSH, et al.,

Respondents.

 

ORDER REOPENING THE TIME TO FILE AN APPEAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 45)

docketed November 1, 2005. The magistrate judge recommends that the petitioner’s

Motion for Court Order Allowing Appeal, construed as a motion to reopen the time for

appeal, be granted. No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed.

The court having reviewed the record, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 45) is ADOPTED

and incorporated into this order by reference.

2. The petitioner’s Motion for Court Order Allowing Appeal (doc. 44), construed

as a motion to reopen the time for appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6), is

GRANTED.

Case 4:03-cv-00325-WS-WCS Document 49 Filed 12/08/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The time for filing an appeal to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals shall be

reopened for a period of 14 days after entry of this order. A motion for rehearing

directed to this court will not toll the time for filing an appeal.

4. The clerk shall forward a copy of document #44 to the respondent with this

recommendation. 

DONE AND ORDERED this December 8, 2005.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:03-cv-00325-WS-WCS Document 49 Filed 12/08/05 Page 2 of 2
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*May 26, 2006*

[Cite as *05/26/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-2589.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2006-0105.

#### State v. Tooley.

Portage App. No. 2004-P-0064, 2005-Ohio-6709. This cause is pending before this court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Portage County.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the following exhibits contained in the court of appeals’ record are placed under seal: Plaintiffs Exhibits 7, 8, 10, 11, 17, 20, and 21, and Defendant’s Exhibit “A.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000755465
<NAME>                        Sandata, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                           $

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         727,520
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,509,906
<ALLOWANCES>                                   471,044
<INVENTORY>                                     54,940
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,214,840
<PP&E>                                      17,327,610
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,149,471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,316,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,188,570
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,481
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,252,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,316,321
<SALES>                                      4,432,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,570,554
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,461,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 44,950
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,230
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,720
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,720
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01



</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00453-CV

Maurilio Navarro and Zulema Cavazos

v.

National General Insurance Co.

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 9 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CL-23-2735-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 22, 2024
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 4:96cr56-RH/WCS

RENEE PATTERSON,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING THIRD MOTION FOR EARLY 

TERMINATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

For the reasons set out in the order of August 7, 2005 (document 739),

defendant Renee Patterson’s third motion for early termination of supervised

release (document 742) is DENIED.

SO ORDERED this 9th day of January, 2006.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:96-cr-00056-RH-WCS Document 743 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:20-cr-00037-MCR Document 32 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00037-MCR Document 32 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00037-MCR Document 32 Filed 12/14/20 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00037-MCR Document 32 Filed 12/14/20 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00037-MCR Document 32 Filed 12/14/20 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00037-MCR Document 32 Filed 12/14/20 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00037-MCR Document 32 Filed 12/14/20 Page 7 of 7
Exhibit  99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of APA Optics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K  for  the  period  ending  March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anil K. Jain, Chief
Executive  Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Sec.  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

1.   The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   The  information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Signature:     /s/  Anil  K.  Jain
               -------------------
Print  Name:   Anil  K.  Jain
               --------------
Print  Title:  Chief  Executive  Officer
               -------------------------


<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-63350,
33-52517, 33-57049, 33-64449, 333-11395 and 333-11397) and in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-10621, 33-21756, 33-34288, 33-48858, 33-54233
and 33-28981) of United Asset Management Corporation of our report dated
February 3, 1998 appearing on page 59 of the Annual Report to Stockholders which
is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule,
which appears on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.





/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
------------------------
Price Waterhouse LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 25, 1998


                                          F-2
Case 1:95-cr-01022-MP   Document 102   Filed 06/01/06   Page 1 of 1
#### The State ex rel. Wheeler, Appellee, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al.; Metro Electric, Inc., Appellant.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Wheeler v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 394.]

(No. 97-2477

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*Harris & Burgin, L.P.A.,*and *Andrea L. Bums,*for appellee.

*Brickler & Eckler, L.L.P., Charles D. Smith*and *Nelson M. Reid,*for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2600 

To amend the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act to clarify how 

the Act applies to condominiums. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2013 

Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. NADLER, Mr. 

GRIMM, and Mr. MCHENRY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act 

to clarify how the Act applies to condominiums. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM 

4 UNITS. 

5 (a) EXEMPTION.—Section 1403 of the Interstate 

6 Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (15 U.S.C. 1702) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (b)— 

9 (A) in paragraph (7)(C), by striking ‘‘or’’ 

10 at the end; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2600 IH

1 (B) in paragraph (8)(G), by striking the 

2 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

3 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(9) the sale or lease of a condominium unit 

5 that is not exempt under subsection (a).’’; and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(d) For purposes of subsection (b), the term ‘condo8 minium unit’ means a unit of residential or commercial 

9 property to be designated for separate ownership pursuant 

10 to a condominium plan or declaration provided that upon 

11 conveyance— 

12 ‘‘(1) the owner of such unit will have sole own13 ership of the unit and an undivided interest in the 

14 common elements appurtenant to the unit; and 

15 ‘‘(2) the unit will be an improved lot.’’. 

16 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

17 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 

18 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS