alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
22.406-13 Semiannual enforcement reports.

A semiannual report on compliance with and enforcement of the construction labor standards

requirements of the Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute and Contract Work Hours and

Safety Standards statute is required from each contracting agency. The reporting periods are

October 1 through March 31 and April 1 through September 30. The reports shall only contain

information as to the enforcement actions of the contracting agency and shall be prepared as

prescribed in Department of Labor memoranda and submitted to the Department of Labor within 30

days after the end of the reporting period. This report has been assigned interagency report control

number 1482-DOL-SA.

Parent topic: 22.406 Administration and enforcement.
Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Westerbeke Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended October 25, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gregory Haidemenos, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

                                       By: /s/ Gregory Haidemenos
                                           ----------------------
                                           Gregory Haidemenos
                                           Chief Financial Officer and
                                           Treasurer

January 23, 2004


<PAGE>
#### § 3431.4 Solicitation of stakeholder input.

The Secretary will solicit stakeholder input on the process and procedures used to designate veterinarian shortage situations prior to the publication of the solicitation for nomination of veterinarian shortage situations. A notice may be published in the Federal Register *,* on the Agency's Web site, or other appropriate format or forum. This request for stakeholder input may include the solicitation of input on the administration of VMLRP and its impact on meeting critical veterinarian shortage situations. All comments will be made available and accessible to the public.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JEFFERY HUDSON MCELWAIN,

 Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5839-MCR-HTC

WILLIAM EDDINS and

LAURA YOUNG,

 Defendants.

______________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated October 6, 2020. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff was provided a 

copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file 

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made 

a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections 

thereto timely filed, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-05839-MCR-HTC Document 7 Filed 11/09/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5839-MCR-HTC

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 5, is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 

2. Plaintiff’s complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED for failure to state a 

claim on which relief may be granted.

3. The clerk is directed to close this file.

DONE and ORDERED this 9th day of November 2020.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05839-MCR-HTC Document 7 Filed 11/09/20 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:95-cr-03089-RV   Document 1160   Filed 03/17/06   Page 1 of 1
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

)

INDEPENDENT PARTY OF )

FLORIDA and PARTY FOR )

SOCIALISM AND LIBERATION, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 4:20-cv-00110-MW-CAS

)

LAUREL M. LEE, Florida )

Secretary of State, in her official )

capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

)

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF RICHARD WINGER

I, Richard Winger, hereby declare that:

1. My name is Richard Winger. I make this declaration based on my 

own personal knowledge. I am competent to testify to the matters 

stated herein.

2. I reside at 3201 Baker Street, San Francisco, California 94123.

3. I submitted a comprehensive declaration in support of the 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction. I submit this declaration 

to supplement information set forth in my first declaration, in 

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 04/23/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 04/23/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

         The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Orion
HealthCorp, Inc. (the "small business issuer"), hereby certifies as follows:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer (the
"Report"), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the small
business issuer.

Dated this 13th day of November, 2006.

/s/ Terrence L. Bauer
----------------------------------------------
 Terrence L. Bauer, Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the small business issuer and
will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2320

AN ACT

To make available funds included in the Deficit Reduction

Act of 2005 for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program for fiscal year 2006, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2320 ES

1 SECTION 1. FUNDS FOR LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY AS2 SISTANCE PROGRAM.

3 Section 9001 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005

4 is amended—

5 (1) in subsection (a)—

6 (A) by striking ‘‘for a 1-time only obliga7 tion and expenditure’’;

8 (B) in paragraph (1), by striking

9 ‘‘$250,000,000 for fiscal year 2007’’ and in10 serting ‘‘$500,000,000 for fiscal year 2006’’;

11 and

12 (C) in paragraph (2), by striking

13 ‘‘$750,000,000 for fiscal year 2007’’ and in14 serting ‘‘$500,000,000 for fiscal year 2006’’;

15 (2) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub16 section (c);

17 (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol18 lowing:

19 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—None of the funds made available

20 under this section may be used for the planning and ad21 ministering described in section 2605(b)(9) of the Low22 Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C.

23 8624(b)(9)).’’; and
†

3

S 2320 ES

1 (4) in subsection (c) (as redesignated by para2 graph (2)), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2007’’ and

3 inserting ‘‘September 30, 2006’’.

Passed the Senate March 7, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2320

AN ACT

To make available funds included in the Deficit Reand for other purposes. Energy Assistance Program for fiscal year 2006, duction Act of 2005 for the Low-Income Home
#### § 301.51-1 Definitions.

*Administrator.* The Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, or any individual authorized to act for the Administrator.

*Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).* The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the United States Department of Agriculture.

*Asian longhorned beetle.* The insect known as Asian longhorned beetle (*Anoplophora glabripennis*) in any stage of development.

*Certificate.* A document which is issued for a regulated article by an inspector or by a person operating under a compliance agreement, and which represents that such article is eligible for interstate movement in accordance with § 301.51-5(a).

*Compliance agreement.* A written agreement between APHIS and a person engaged in growing, handling, or moving regulated articles that are moved interstate, in which the person agrees to comply with the provisions of this subpart and any conditions imposed under this subpart.

*Infestation.* The presence of the Asian longhorned beetle in any life stage.

*Inspector.* Any employee of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, or other individual authorized by the Administrator to enforce the provisions of this subpart.

*Interstate.* From any State into or through any other State.

*Limited permit.* A document in which an inspector affirms that the regulated article not eligible for a certificate is eligible for interstate movement only to a specified destination and in accordance with conditions specified on the permit.

*Moved (movement, move).* Shipped, offered for shipment, received for transportation, transported, carried, or allowed to be moved, shipped, transported, or carried.

*Person.* Any association, company, corporation, firm, individual, joint stock company, partnership, society, or any other legal entity.

*Quarantined area.* Any State, or any portion of a State, listed in accordance with § 301.51-2 or otherwise designated as a quarantined area in accordance with § 301.51-3(b).

*Regulated article.* Any article identified as a regulated article under § 301.51-2 as follows: listed as of January 30, 2023, added in accordance with § 301.51-2(b), or otherwise designated in accordance with § 301.51-2(c).

*State.* The District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, or any State, territory, or possession of the United States.

[62 FR 10416, Mar. 7, 1997, as amended at 87 FR 80006, Dec. 29, 2022]
#### In the Matter of Alan Kolanda, Appellant, v. John R. Brunner, as Mayor of the Village of Endicott, et al., Respondents.

Aulisi, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court which denied petitioner’s motion to dismiss certain charges against him in a police department disciplinary action. Petitioner contends that respondents have not adequately responded to the court’s orders and judgments requiring bills of. particulars to amplify the specifications against him. It is our view, however, that insofar as they are amplified by the second bill of particulars, the charges appear adequate at this point, but can better be assessed in light of the proof adduced after the proceeding is had. CPLR 7801 provides that an article 78 proceeding can not be used to challenge a determination “ which is not final ”. The authorities relied upon by petitioner are all eases where review of the charges was had on review of the whole ease, a remedy petitioner will be entitled to here pursuant to section 188-g of the Village Law, Order affirmed, without costs. *887Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Aulisi, J.
Page 1 of 3

Case No. 5:03cr38-RH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 5:03cr38-RH

ADAM FRANKLIN BOYD,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER REDUCING SENTENCE

The defendant Adam Franklin Boyd has moved to reduce his sentence under 

United States Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782. That amendment allows a 

court to reduce a defendant’s sentence, effective as of November 1, 2015, under 

specific circumstances. By order docketed on August 5, 2015, ECF No. 47, I gave 

notice of my intent to reduce Mr. Boyd’s sentence to the greater of 181 months or 

time served, unless the government or Mr. Boyd showed that I should not do so. 

The government has filed a response that acknowledges my discretion to 

reduce Mr. Boyd’s sentence and does not oppose the reduction. Based on the 

existing record, including the presentence report, I conclude that Mr. Boyd’s 

sentence should be reduced as set out in the prior order. 

Case 5:03-cr-00038-RH-WCS Document 50 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No. 5:03cr38-RH

One other matter deserves mention. The government’s response refers to a 

memorandum from the probation office to the court. Without my knowledge, a 

copy of the memorandum was provided to the government. So far as I know, a 

copy was not provided to Mr. Boyd. My practice is to provide materials of that 

kind to a party only if it is simultaneously provided to the other party. In any 

event, I consider 782 issues de novo, without deference to the probation office’s 

analysis; I use memoranda of this kind only to verify my own calculations. In 

instances in which, unlike here, there is factual information in a probation 

memorandum that affects the 782 analysis—for example, information about a 

defendant’s post-sentencing conduct or prison disciplinary record—I always 

provide the information to both sides and give both sides an opportunity to be 

heard. Here I have not provided the probation memorandum to Mr. Boyd or made 

it part of the record because it has not affected the analysis.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The motion to reduce sentence, ECF No. 45, is granted.

2. Mr. Boyd’s sentence is reduced to the greater of 181 months or time 

served, effective as of November 1, 2015. The judgment remains the same in all 

other respects.

Case 5:03-cr-00038-RH-WCS Document 50 Filed 09/18/15 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No. 5:03cr38-RH

3. The clerk must provide a copy of this order to Mr. Boyd himself by 

mail and to the attorneys of record and the Federal Public Defender through the 

electronic filing system. 

SO ORDERED on September 18, 2015.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:03-cr-00038-RH-WCS Document 50 Filed 09/18/15 Page 3 of 3
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 5:03cr33/MCR

5:09cv135/MCR/CJK

DAVID E. MARTINELLI

 /

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Order and

Second Amended Report and Recommendation (“Report and Recommendation”), dated

November 30, 2011 (doc. 426). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.1

2. The amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (doc. 362)

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of January, 2012.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The court would note, however, that the trial of this matter lasted for three weeks, rather than three

1

days as indicated on page 3 of the Report and Recommendation.
[Cite as State v. Bodyke , 126 Ohio St.3d 1235, 2010-Ohio-3737.]

T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLEE , v . B ODYKE ET AL ., A PPELLANTS . [Cite as State v. Bodyke , 126 Ohio St.3d 1235, 2010-Ohio-3737.] Motion for reconsideration and/or clarification denied. (No. 2008-2502

— Submitted July 6, 2010

— Decided August 17, 2010.) A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Huron County, Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387. O N M OTION FOR R ECONSIDERATION AND / OR C LARIFICATION

__________________ {¶ 1} On June 3, 2010, the court reversed the judgment of the court of appeals in this case. State v. Bodyke , 126 Ohio St.3d 266, 2010-Ohio-2424, ___ N.E.2d ___. {¶ 2} Appellee, state of Ohio, and amicus curiae Ohio Attorney General have filed a joint motion for rec onsideration and/or clarification. {¶ 3} The motion for reconsideration a nd/or clarification is denied.
B ROWN , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , and L ANZINGER , JJ., concur. O’D ONNELL and C UPP , JJ., dissent.

__________________ C UPP , J., dissenting. {¶ 4} I would grant the state’s motion for clarification of this court’s decision in State v. Bodyke, to clarify that Bodyke does not apply to cases in which there is no prior court order classi fying the defendant into a sex-offender category that existed under Megan’s Law. The majority decision in Bodyke states that it was based on the concern th at R.C. 2950.031 and 2950.032 “require the attorney general to reclassify sex offe nders whose classifica tions have already been adjudicated by a court and made the subject of a final order.” Bodyke , 126S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 Ohio St.3d 266, 2010-Ohio-2424, ___ N.E.2d ___, at ¶ 61. To the extent that particular sex offenders have not been previously “adjudicated by a court” to be within a particular classifi cation under prior law, those offenders are not affected by the Bodyke decision. I believe that the court should grant clarification for this limited purpose. {¶ 5} For these reasons, I dissent from the majority’s decision to deny the motion for reconsiderati on and/or clarification. O’D ONNELL , J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.

__________________ Russell V. Leffler, Huron County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Gamso, Helmick & Hoolahan and Je ffrey M. Gamso; and Hiltz, Wiedemann, Allton & Koch Co., L.P.A., and John D. Allton, for appellants. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, Benjamin C. Mizer, Solicitor General, Alexandra T. Schimmer, Chief Deputy Solicitor General, David M. Lieberman, Deputy Solicitor, Christopher P. Conomy, Assistant Solicitor, and James A. Hogan, Assistant Attorney General, for amicus curiae Ohio Attorney General.

______________________
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned, William Lieberman, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Fox Petroleum Inc. hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fox Petroleum Inc. for the period ended May 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Fox Petroleum Inc.








Date: January 18, 2011





/s/   "William Lieberman"William Lieberman

President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Fox Petroleum Inc. and will be retained by Fox Petroleum Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 4280.16 REDL and REDG Loan terms. REDL and REDG loans made by the Intermediary are governed by the following terms: ( a ) The maximum term of a loan is 10 years, including any principal deferment period. The Intermediary may choose a shorter term if desired.
( b ) Deferments on Zero-Interest Loans will automatically be granted by Rural Development upon request of the Intermediary as follows: ( 1 ) A deferral for up to 1 year for Projects involving an Established Operation; or
( 2 ) A deferral for up to 2 years for Projects involving a Start-Up venture or a Community Facilities Project whether or not such Project also receives funding under USDA Community Facilities funding programs.
( c ) The Intermediary must provide the Ultimate Recipient with the same loan terms as the Intermediary receives from Rural Development.
( d ) The Intermediary is solely responsible for the financial approval of Fund loans and all other Fund decisions and actions.
Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ASA
International Ltd. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Alfred C. Angelone, Director, Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                 /s/ Alfred C. Angelone
                                 ----------------------
Dated:  March 31, 2003           Alfred C. Angelone
                                 Director, Chief Executive Officer and President
#### § 3555.1 Applicability.

This part sets forth policies for the Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program (SFHGLP) administered by USDA Rural Development. It addresses the requirements of section 502(h) of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and includes policies regarding originating, servicing, holding and liquidating SFHGLP loans. Any provision regarding the expenditure of funds under this part is contingent upon the availability of funds.
# L_2021382EN.01005601.xml

| 28.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 382/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 382/56

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/618 of 15 April 2021 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for diclofop, fluopyram, ipconazole and terbuthylazine in or on certain products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 131 of 16 April 2021
  )

Between pages 69 and 71, in 14 separate instances:

for:

‘[Office of Publication: please insert date 2 years after publication]’,

read:

‘
  16 April 2023
  ’

---