UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


             For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14099


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



         California                                               94-2940204
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)


                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     Financial Statements


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                 March 31, 2004

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $ 186
   Receivables and deposits                                                      24
   Other assets                                                                 183
   Investment property:
      Land                                                    $ 916
      Buildings and related personal property                 10,472
                                                              11,388
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (6,233)         5,155

                                                                            $ 5,548
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 37
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           96
   Accrued property taxes                                                        92
   Other liabilities                                                            104
   Due to affiliates (Note B)                                                   111
   Mortgage note payable                                                      4,999

Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
   General partner                                             $ (2)
   Special limited partners                                      (79)
   Limited partners (181,300 units issued and
      outstanding)                                               190            109

                                                                            $ 5,548


         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>



<PAGE>






                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                Three Months Ended
                                                                       March 31,
                                                                 2004          2003
Revenues:
<S>                                                             <C>           <C>
   Rental income                                                $ 427         $ 412
   Other income                                                     51            60
   Casualty gain                                                     5            --
      Total revenues                                               483           472

Expenses:
   Operating                                                       173           205
   General and administrative                                       54            26
   Depreciation                                                    117           119
   Interest                                                         99           103
   Property taxes                                                   30            39
      Total expenses                                               473           492

Net income (loss)                                                $ 10         $ (20)

Net income (loss) allocated to general partner (0.2%)            $ --          $ --

Net income (loss) allocated to limited partners (99.8%)             10           (20)
                                                                 $ 10         $ (20)

Net income (loss) per limited partnership unit                  $ 0.06        $ (.11)
Distributions per limited partnership unit                      $ 0.59         $ --


         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>



<PAGE>




                      CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
     CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIENCY) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                    Limited                 Special
                                  Partnership    General    Limited   Limited
                                     Units       Partner   Partners   Partners     Total

<S>                                 <C>            <C>       <C>      <C>         <C>
Original capital contributions      181,808        $ 1       $ --     $45,452     $45,453

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at December 31, 2003             181,300       $ (2)      $ (75)    $ 283       $ 206

Distributions paid to partners           --          --         (4)      (103)       (107)

Net income for the three
   months ended March 31, 2004           --          --         --         10          10

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at March 31, 2004                181,300       $ (2)      $ (79)    $ 190       $ 109


         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>





                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                       March 31,
                                                                   2004       2003
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                               <C>         <C>
  Net income (loss)                                               $ 10        $ (20)
  Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
   cash provided by operating activities:
   Depreciation                                                     117          119
   Amortization of loan costs                                         2            2
   Casualty gain                                                     (5)          --
  Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                        2           (4)
      Other assets                                                  (58)          (1)
      Accounts payable                                              (42)           6
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                            (2)           6
      Accrued property taxes                                        (32)         (31)
      Other liabilities                                              62            4
      Due to affiliates                                              23           12
         Net cash provided by operating activities                   77           93

Cash flows used in investing activities:
  Insurance proceeds received                                        12           --
  Property improvements and replacements                            (12)         (68)
         Net cash used in investing activities                       --          (68)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                 (27)         (38)
  Distributions paid to partners                                   (107)          --
         Net cash used in financing activities                     (134)         (38)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                           (57)         (13)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    243          178
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                       $ 186        $ 165

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                          $ 65        $ 101


         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>



<PAGE>





                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying  unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements of Consolidated
Capital  Properties VI (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial  statements.  In the opinion of ConCap  Equities,  Inc.  ("CEI" or the
"General  Partner"),  all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating
results  for the  three  months  ended  March  31,  2004,  are  not  necessarily
indicative  of the  results  that may be  expected  for the fiscal  year  ending
December 31, 2004. For further information,  refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's  Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. The General  Partner is
an  affiliate  of Apartment  Investment  and  Management  Company  ("AIMCO"),  a
publicly traded real estate investment trust.

Note B - Related Party Transactions

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership.

Affiliates of the General  Partner are entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts
from  the  Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$23,000  and  $24,000  for the  three  months  ended  March  31,  2004 and 2003,
respectively, which is included in operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of  the  General  Partner  earned  reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $32,000 and $11,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003,  respectively,  which is included in
general  and  administrative  expenses.  Approximately  $111,000  of  cumulative
administrative expenses remained unpaid as of March 31, 2004 and are included in
due to affiliates.

The Partnership Agreement also provides for a special management fee equal to 9%
of the total  distributions  made from operations to the Limited  Partners to be
paid  to  the  General  Partner  for  executive  and  administrative  management
services.  The General  Partner  earned  approximately  $9,000  during the three
months  ended March 31,  2004 which is  included  in general and  administrative
expenses.  No such fee was earned for the three  months  ended March 31, 2003 as
there were no operating distributions.

The  Partnership  insures its  property up to certain  limits  through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability.  The Partnership  insures its property above the AIMCO limits through
insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the General
Partner.  During  2004,  the  Partnership  anticipates  its cost  for  insurance
coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration provided by AIMCO
and its affiliates will be  approximately  $14,000.  The Partnership was charged
approximately $21,000 for 2003.

Note C - Casualty Event

The  casualty  gain is related  to a pipe bomb  explosion  in January  2004 that
damaged 16  electrical  meters and  exterior  siding.  No  apartment  units were
damaged. A casualty gain of approximately $5,000 was recognized during the three
months  ended  March 31,  2004 due to the  receipt of  approximately  $12,000 in
insurance  proceeds,  net  of  the  write  off  of  undepreciated  property  and
improvements of approximately $7,000.

Note D - Contingencies

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purported to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships  (including the Partnership) that are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time,  affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief,  including judicial
dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a
complaint (the "Heller  action") was filed against the same  defendants that are
named in the Nuanes action,  captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or
about August 6, 2001,  plaintiffs  filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller
action was brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserted claims for,
among other things,  breach of fiduciary duty, unfair  competition,  conversion,
unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make at least
one round of tender offers to purchase all of the  partnership  interests in the
Partnerships within one year of final approval, if it is granted, and to provide
partners  with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The
proposed  settlement  also provided for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs
which the General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector")  filed an  appeal  seeking  to  vacate  and/or  reverse  the  order
approving the settlement and entering  judgment  thereto.  On November 24, 2003,
the Objector filed an  application  requesting the Court order AIMCO to withdraw
settlement  tender offers it had  commenced,  refrain from making further offers
pending the appeal and auction any units tendered to third  parties,  contending
that the offers did not conform  with the terms of the  Settlement.  Counsel for
the Objector (on behalf of another  investor)  had  alternatively  requested the
Court take certain  action  purportedly  to enforce the terms of the  settlement
agreement.  On December 18, 2003,  the Court heard oral  argument on the motions
and denied them both in their entirety.  On January 28, 2004, Objector filed his
opening brief in his pending appeal.  On April 23, 2004, the General Partner and
its  affiliates  filed a response  brief in support  of the  settlement  and the
judgment  thereto.  Plaintiffs  have  also  filed  a  brief  in  support  of the
settlement.  Objector is  scheduled  to file a reply brief no later than May 13,
2004.

On August 8, 2003 AIMCO  Properties  L.P., an affiliate of the General  Partner,
was served with a Complaint in the United  States  District  Court,  District of
Columbia alleging that AIMCO Properties L.P.  willfully  violated the Fair Labor
Standards  Act (FLSA) by failing to pay  maintenance  workers  overtime  for all
hours worked in excess of forty per week. On March 5, 2004  Plaintiffs  filed an
amended complaint also naming NHP Management Company, which is also an affiliate
of the General Partner. The Complaint is styled as a Collective Action under the
FLSA and seeks to certify state  subclasses  in  California,  Maryland,  and the
District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties
L.P. failed to compensate  maintenance  workers for time that they were required
to be "on-call".  Additionally,  the Complaint  alleges  AIMCO  Properties  L.P.
failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time that
they worked in responding to a call while  "on-call".  The Defendants have filed
an  answer  to  the  Amended  Complaint  denying  the  substantive  allegations.
Discovery is currently underway.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs,  associated with these cases will be material
to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership  is unaware  of any other  pending  or  outstanding  litigation
matters  involving  it or its  investment  properties  that are not of a routine
nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

Pursuant to a formal order of investigation received by AIMCO on March 29, 2004,
the  Central  Regional  Office of the  United  States  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission is conducting an  investigation  relating to certain  matters.  AIMCO
believes the areas of investigation  include AIMCO's  miscalculated  monthly net
rental  income  figures in third  quarter 2003,  forecasted  guidance,  accounts
payable,  rent concessions,  vendor rebates,  and capitalization of expenses and
payroll.  AIMCO is cooperating  fully.  AIMCO does not believe that the ultimate
outcome  will  have a  material  adverse  effect on its  consolidated  financial
condition  or results of  operations  taken as a whole.  Similarly,  the General
Partner does not believe that the ultimate  outcome will have a material adverse
effect on the  Partnership's  consolidated  financial  condition  or  results of
operations taken as a whole.


<PAGE>

ITEM 2.     Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending   claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes  and   possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment property consists of one apartment complex, Colony
of Springdale Apartments, located in Springdale, Ohio. The average occupancy for
the  three  month  periods  ended  March  31,  2004 and  2003,  was 92% and 89%,
respectively.  The General  Partner  attributes the increase in occupancy at the
property to increased marketing and resident retention efforts.

The  Partnership's  financial  results  are  dependent  upon a number of factors
including  the  ability  to  attract  and  maintain  tenants  at the  investment
property,  interest  rates on  mortgage  loans,  costs  incurred  to operate the
investment  property,  general economic  conditions and weather.  As part of the
ongoing  business  plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner  monitors the
rental market  environment of its investment  property to assess the feasibility
of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing  occupancy levels and protecting
the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of this plan, the General
Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related
increases  in  expenses  by  increasing  rents and  maintaining  a high  overall
occupancy  level.  However,  the General Partner may use rental  concessions and
rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions, accordingly, there
is no  guarantee  that the General  Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.
Further,  a number of factors  which are outside the control of the  Partnership
such as the local  economic  climate  and weather can  adversely  or  positively
impact the Partnership's financial results.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's  net income for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2004 was
approximately  $10,000  compared  to net loss of  approximately  $20,000 for the
corresponding  period in 2003.  Net income  increased for the three months ended
March 31,  2004 as compared to the same period in 2003 as a result of a decrease
in total expenses and an increase in total revenues.

Total  expenses  decreased  for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2004 due to
decreases in operating and property tax expenses partially offset by an increase
in  general  and  administrative  expenses.  Operating  expenses  decreased  due
primarily to a decrease in maintenance expenses.  Maintenance expenses decreased
primarily  due to decreases in contract  services and snow removal  costs at the
Partnership's property.  Property tax expense decreased due to a decrease in the
assessed value of the property.

General and  administrative  expenses increased for the three months ended March
31, 2004  primarily  due to an increase in the cost of services  included in the
management   reimbursements   to  the  General  Partner  as  allowed  under  the
Partnership  Agreement.  The  increase is also due to an increase in the special
management fees earned by the General  Partner for executive and  administration
management services. The fee is equal to 9% of the total distributions made from
operations to the Limited Partners.  Also included in general and administrative
expenses at March 31, 2004 and 2003 are costs  associated with the quarterly and
annual  communications  with  investors and  regulatory  agencies and the annual
audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

The  increase in total  revenues  for the three  months  ended March 31, 2004 is
attributable  to an increase in rental  income and a casualty gain (as discussed
below),  partially offset by a decrease in other income. Rental income increased
primarily  due to an increase in occupancy and a decrease in bad debt expense at
Colony of  Springdale  Apartments.  Other Income  decreased  primarily  due to a
decrease in late charges at the Partnership's property.

The  casualty  gain is related  to a pipe bomb  explosion  in January  2004 that
damaged 16  electrical  meters and  exterior  siding.  No  apartment  units were
damaged. A casualty gain of approximately $5,000 was recognized during the three
months  ended  March 31,  2004 due to the  receipt of  approximately  $12,000 in
insurance  proceeds,  net  of  the  write  off  of  undepreciated  property  and
improvements of approximately $7,000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  March  31,  2004,  the  Partnership   had  cash  and  cash   equivalents  of
approximately  $186,000  compared to  approximately  $165,000 at March 31, 2003.
Cash and cash equivalents  decreased by approximately $57,000 since December 31,
2003  due to  approximately  $134,000  of  cash  used  in  financing  activities
partially  offset  by  approximately  $77,000  of  cash  provided  by  operating
activities.  Cash used in financing  activities  consisted of principal payments
made on the mortgage  encumbering the  Partnership's  property and distributions
paid to  partners.  Cash used in  investing  activities  consisted  of  property
improvements  and  replacements  offset  by  insurance  proceeds  received.  The
Partnership invests its working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal,  state,
and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  General  Partner  monitors
developments in the area of legal and regulatory  compliance and is studying new
federal laws,  including the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002  mandates  or suggests  additional  compliance  measures  with regard to
governance,  disclosure,  audit and other areas. In light of these changes,  the
Partnership  expects that it will incur higher  expenses  related to compliance,
including increased legal and audit fees. Capital  improvements  planned for the
Partnership's property are discussed below.

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2004,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately   $12,000  of  capital   improvements   at  Colony  of  Springdale
Apartments,  consisting primarily of floor covering  replacements and electrical
upgrades.   These  improvements  were  funded  from  operating  cash  flow.  The
Partnership  evaluates the capital  improvement needs of the property during the
year and  currently  expects  to  complete  an  additional  $132,000  in capital
improvements  during the remainder of 2004. The additional capital  improvements
will consist primarily of roof replacements, water/sewer upgrades and structural
improvements.  Additional capital improvements may be considered and will depend
on the physical  condition of the property as well as the anticipated  cash flow
generated by the property.

The  Partnership's  assets are thought to be sufficient  for any near term needs
(exclusive  of  capital   improvements)   of  the   Partnership.   The  mortgage
indebtedness  encumbering the Partnership's property of approximately $4,999,000
matures in November  2019 at which time the  mortgage is  scheduled  to be fully
amortized.


<PAGE>



The Partnership  distributed the following amounts during the three months ended
March 31, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands, except per unit data):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                  Three Months       Per          Three Months         Per
                     Ended         Limited           Ended           Limited
                   March 31,     Partnership       March 31,       Partnership
                      2004          Unit              2003             Unit
<S>                    <C>          <C>             <C>                <C>
   Operations          $107         $  0.59         $   --             $   --
</TABLE>

The  Partnership's  cash  available  for  distribution  is reviewed on a monthly
basis. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated
from  operations,  the  availability of cash reserves and the timing of the debt
maturity,  refinancing,  and/or sale of the property.  There can be no assurance
that the  Partnership  will  generate  sufficient  funds from  operations  after
required capital expenditures to permit further distributions to its partners in
2004 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 101,636 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 56.06% of the outstanding Units at
March 31, 2004. A number of these Units were acquired  pursuant to tender offers
made by AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is possible  that AIMCO or its  affiliates
will acquire  additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and
units in AIMCO  Properties,  L.P., the operating  partnership  of AIMCO,  either
through  private  purchases  or  tender  offers.  Pursuant  to  the  Partnership
Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take
action with  respect to a variety of matters that  include,  but are not limited
to,  voting on certain  amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove  the  General  Partner.  As a result  of its  ownership  of 56.06% of the
outstanding  Units,  AIMCO and its  affiliates  are in a position to control all
voting decisions with respect to the  Partnership.  Although the General Partner
owes fiduciary duties to the limited  partners of the  Partnership,  the General
Partner  also  owes  fiduciary  duties  to AIMCO as its sole  stockholder.  As a
result,  the  duties  of  the  General  Partner,  as  general  partner,  to  the
Partnership  and its limited  partners may come into conflict with the duties of
the General Partner to AIMCO, its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The  investment  property is recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's  investment  property.  These factors include, but are not limited
to,  changes  in the  national,  regional  and  local  economic  climate;  local
conditions,  such as an oversupply of multifamily  properties;  competition from
other available  multifamily property owners and changes in market rental rates.
Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnership's
assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized monthly as it is earned. The
Partnership  evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an
allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than
30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.
The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or
in response to heavy  competition from other similar  complexes in the area. Any
concessions  given at the inception of the lease are amortized  over the life of
the lease.

ITEM 3.     Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.

<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purported to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships  (including the Partnership) that are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time,  affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief,  including judicial
dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a
complaint (the "Heller  action") was filed against the same  defendants that are
named in the Nuanes action,  captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or
about August 6, 2001,  plaintiffs  filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller
action was brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserted claims for,
among other things,  breach of fiduciary duty, unfair  competition,  conversion,
unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make at least
one round of tender offers to purchase all of the  partnership  interests in the
Partnerships within one year of final approval, if it is granted, and to provide
partners  with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The
proposed  settlement  also provided for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs
which the General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
("Objector")  filed an  appeal  seeking  to  vacate  and/or  reverse  the  order
approving the settlement and entering  judgment  thereto.  On November 24, 2003,
the Objector filed an  application  requesting the Court order AIMCO to withdraw
settlement  tender offers it had  commenced,  refrain from making further offers
pending the appeal and auction any units tendered to third  parties,  contending
that the offers did not conform  with the terms of the  Settlement.  Counsel for
the Objector (on behalf of another  investor)  had  alternatively  requested the
Court take certain  action  purportedly  to enforce the terms of the  settlement
agreement.  On December 18, 2003,  the Court heard oral  argument on the motions
and denied them both in their entirety.  On January 28, 2004, Objector filed his
opening brief in his pending appeal.  On April 23, 2004, the General Partner and
its  affiliates  filed a response  brief in support  of the  settlement  and the
judgment  thereto.  Plaintiffs  have  also  filed  a  brief  in  support  of the
settlement.  Objector is  scheduled  to file a reply brief no later than May 13,
2004.

On August 8, 2003 AIMCO  Properties  L.P., an affiliate of the General  Partner,
was served with a Complaint in the United  States  District  Court,  District of
Columbia alleging that AIMCO Properties L.P.  willfully  violated the Fair Labor
Standards  Act (FLSA) by failing to pay  maintenance  workers  overtime  for all
hours worked in excess of forty per week. On March 5, 2004  Plaintiffs  filed an
amended complaint also naming NHP Management Company, which is also an affiliate
of the General Partner. The Complaint is styled as a Collective Action under the
FLSA and seeks to certify state  subclasses  in  California,  Maryland,  and the
District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties
L.P. failed to compensate  maintenance  workers for time that they were required
to be "on-call".  Additionally,  the Complaint  alleges  AIMCO  Properties  L.P.
failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time that
they worked in responding to a call while  "on-call".  The Defendants have filed
an  answer  to  the  Amended  Complaint  denying  the  substantive  allegations.
Discovery is currently underway.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs,  associated with these cases will be material
to the Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a) Exhibits:

            3.1   Certificate of Limited Partnership,  incorporated by reference
                  to the Registration  Statement of Registrant filed October 22,
                  1984, as amended to date.

            3.2   Agreement of Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to
                  the  Registration  Statement of  Registrant  filed October 22,
                  1984, as amended to date.

            31.1  Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Executive  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

            31.2  Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Financial  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

            32.1  Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as Adopted
                  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

            b) Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended March 31, 2004.


<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI


                                    By:   CONCAP EQUITIES, INC.
                                          General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Thomas M. Herzog
                                           Thomas M. Herzog
                                           Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Accounting Officer


                                    Date: May 13, 2004


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Martha L. Long, certify that:


1.    I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Consolidated
      Capital Properties VI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2004

                                    /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Martha L. Long
                                    Senior  Vice   President  of  ConCap
                                    Equities,  Inc.,  equivalent  of the
                                    chief   executive   officer  of  the
                                    Partnership


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Thomas M. Herzog, certify that:


1.    I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Consolidated
      Capital Properties VI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2004

                                    /s/Thomas M. Herzog
                                    Thomas M. Herzog
                                    Senior Vice  President  and Chief
                                    Accounting   Officer   of  ConCap
                                    Equities,   Inc.,  equivalent  of
                                    the chief  financial  officer  of
                                    the Partnership


<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated  Capital
Properties VI (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive  officer of
the Partnership,  and Thomas M. Herzog, as the equivalent of the chief financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Name:  Martha L. Long
                                    Date:  May 13, 2004


                                           /s/Thomas M. Herzog
                                    Name:  Thomas M. Herzog
                                    Date:  May 13, 2004



This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.