UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                    For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14099


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



         California                                              94-2940204
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

<PAGE>

                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     Financial Statements


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                  June 30, 2003
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $ 119
   Receivables and deposits                                                      29
   Other assets                                                                 136
   Investment property:
      Land                                                    $ 916
      Buildings and related personal property                 10,459
                                                              11,375
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (5,893)         5,482

                                                                            $ 5,766
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 26
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           84
   Accrued property taxes                                                        72
   Other liabilities                                                            116
   Due to affiliates                                                             17
   Mortgage note payable                                                      5,118

Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
   General partner                                             $ (2)
   Special limited partners                                      (73)
   Limited partners (181,300 units issued and
      outstanding)                                               408            333

                                                                            $ 5,766

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          Three Months                 Six Months
                                         Ended June 30,              Ended June 30,
                                       2003          2002          2003          2002
Revenues:
<S>                                    <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>
   Rental income                       $ 405         $ 443         $ 817        $ 867
   Other income                            64            62           124          107
   Casualty gain (Note C)                  --            18            --           18
       Total revenues                     469           523           941          992

Expenses:
   Operating                              197           197           402          371
   General and administrative              25            37            51           80
   Depreciation                           121           114           240          225
   Interest                               102           107           205          214
   Property taxes                          39            38            78           68
       Total expenses                     484           493           976          958

Net (loss) income                      $ (15)        $ 30          $ (35)        $ 34

Net (loss) income allocated to
   general partner (0.2%)              $ --          $ --          $ --          $ --

Net (loss) income allocated to
   limited partners (99.8%)               (15)           30           (35)          34

                                       $ (15)        $ 30          $ (35)        $ 34

Net (loss) income per limited
   partnership unit                   $ (0.08)      $ 0.17        $ (0.19)      $ 0.19

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                         CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIENCY) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                    Limited                 Special
                                  Partnership    General    Limited   Limited
                                     Units       Partner   Partners   Partners     Total

<S>                                 <C>            <C>       <C>      <C>         <C>
Original capital contributions      181,808        $ 1       $ --     $45,452     $45,453

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at December 31, 2002             181,300       $ (2)      $ (73)    $ 443       $ 368

Net loss for the six months
   ended June 30, 2003                   --          --         --        (35)        (35)

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at June 30, 2003                 181,300       $ (2)      $ (73)    $ 408       $ 333

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Six Months Ended
                                                                        June 30,
                                                                  2003        2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>
  Net (loss) income                                              $ (35)       $ 34
  Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net
   cash provided by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                   240          225
     Amortization of loan costs                                       3            3
     Casualty gain                                                   --          (18)
     Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                       (4)          13
      Other assets                                                  (24)         (18)
      Accounts payable                                              (13)         (75)
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                             9            8
      Accrued property taxes                                        (63)         (63)
      Other liabilities                                               6           59
      Due to affiliates                                              17           23
         Net cash provided by operating activities                  136          191

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (119)        (201)
  Insurance proceeds received                                        --           19
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (119)        (182)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                 (76)         (70)
  Advances from affiliates                                           --           98
  Payments on advances from affiliates                               --         (184)
         Net cash used in financing activities                      (76)        (156)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                           (59)        (147)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    178          240
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                       $ 119        $ 93

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                         $ 201        $ 211

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying  unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements of Consolidated
Capital  Properties VI (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial  statements.  In the opinion of ConCap  Equities,  Inc.  ("CEI" or the
"General  Partner"),  all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating
results for the three and six months  ended June 30, 2003,  are not  necessarily
indicative  of the  results  that may be  expected  for the fiscal  year  ending
December 31, 2003. For further information,  refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's  Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. The General  Partner is
an  affiliate  of Apartment  Investment  and  Management  Company  ("AIMCO"),  a
publicly traded real estate investment trust.

Note B - Related Party Transactions

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership.

Affiliates of the General  Partner are entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts
from  the  Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management services. The Partnership paid such affiliates  approximately $48,000
and $58,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, which
is included in operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of  the  General  Partner  earned  reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $25,000 and $63,000 for the
six months  ended June 30,  2003 and 2002,  respectively,  which is  included in
general and administrative expenses.  Approximately $17,000 of the fees for 2003
remained unpaid as of June 30, 2003.

The Partnership Agreement also provides for a special management fee equal to 9%
of the total  distributions  made from operations to the Limited  Partners to be
paid  to  the  General  Partner  for  executive  and  administrative  management
services. No such fee was earned for the six months ended June 30, 2003 or 2002.

The  Partnership  had  advances  from an  affiliate  of the  General  Partner of
approximately $139,000 as of December 31, 2001. During the six months ended June
30, 2002, the Partnership  received additional advances from an affiliate of the
General Partner of approximately  $98,000 and repaid  approximately  $188,000 of
these advances including  approximately $4,000 in accrued interest.  The balance
of this advance was repaid during the remainder of 2002. Interest was charged at
the prime rate plus 2% and amounted to  approximately  $3,000 for the six months
ended June 30, 2002.  There were no loans from the General Partner or associated
interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2003.

The  Partnership  insures its  property up to certain  limits  through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability.  The Partnership  insures its property above the AIMCO limits through
insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the General
Partner. During the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Partnership was
charged  by  AIMCO  and  its  affiliates   approximately  $21,000  and  $25,000,
respectively,  for  insurance  coverage and fees  associated  with policy claims
administration.

Note C - Casualty Gain

The casualty gain is related to a fire at the property in August 2001. A gain of
approximately $43,000 was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2001. An
additional gain of  approximately  $18,000 was recognized  during the six months
ended June 30,  2002 due to the  receipt of  additional  insurance  proceeds  of
approximately $19,000, net of the write off of additional undepreciated property
improvements and replacements of approximately $1,000.

Note D - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purported to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships  (including the Partnership) that are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time,  affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief,  including judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint, which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order  granting in part the  demurrer.  The Court  dismissed  without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General Partner and affiliated defendants opposed the motion. On April 29, 2002,
the Court held a hearing on plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took
the matter under submission after further briefing, as ordered by the court, was
submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002, the Court entered an order vacating
the trial date of  January  13,  2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and  discovery
cut-off dates) and stayed the case in its entirety  through  November 7, 2002 so
that the parties could have an opportunity to discuss settlement. On October 30,
2002, the court entered an order  extending the stay in effect  through  January
10, 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first  amended  complaint.  The  Heller  action  was  brought  as a  purported
derivative  action,  and  asserted  claims for,  among other  things,  breach of
fiduciary duty, unfair competition,  conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial
dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a motion to consolidate  the
Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that the Heller action was filed
in order to preserve the derivative  claims that were dismissed without leave to
amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated July 10, 2001. On October 5,
2001, the General  Partner and affiliated  defendants  moved to strike the first
amended  complaint in its entirety for violating the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes action,
or  alternatively,  to strike  certain  portions of the  complaint  based on the
statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants in the action demurred to the fourth
amended  complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to  strike  the  complaint.  On
December 11, 2001,  the court heard argument on the motions and took the matters
under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court  served  notice of its order
granting defendants' motion to strike the Heller complaint as a violation of its
July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On March 27,  2002,  the  plaintiffs
filed a notice  appealing the order  striking the complaint.  Before  completing
briefing on the appeal, the parties stayed further  proceedings in the appeal in
light of a settlement.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action described below.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make a tender
offer to purchase all of the partnership  interests in the  Partnerships  within
one year of final approval,  if it is granted,  and to provide partners with the
independent  appraisals at the time of these  tenders.  The proposed  settlement
also  provided  for the  limitation  of the  allowable  costs  which the General
Partner or its affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships in connection with this
litigation  and  imposes  limits  on the  class  counsel  fees and costs in this
litigation.  On April 11,  2003,  notice was  distributed  to  limited  partners
providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs,  associated with these cases will be material
to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

ITEM 2.     Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending   claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes  and   possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment property consists of one apartment complex, Colony
of Springdale Apartments, located in Springdale, Ohio. The average occupancy for
the six  month  periods  ended  June  30,  2003  and  2002,  was  90%  and  95%,
respectively.  The decrease in occupancy at Colony of  Springdale  Apartments is
due to competitive market conditions and unfavorable  economic conditions in the
local market area.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's  net  loss  for  the six  months  ended  June  30,  2003  was
approximately  $35,000 compared to net income of  approximately  $34,000 for the
corresponding  period in 2002. The  Partnership's  net loss for the three months
ended  June  30,  2003 was  approximately  $15,000  compared  to net  income  of
approximately $30,000 for the corresponding period in 2002. Net income decreased
for the six months ended June 30, 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002 as
a result of a decrease in total revenues and an increase in total expenses.  Net
income  decreased  for the three  months  ended June 30, 2003 as compared to the
same period in 2002 as a result of a decrease in total revenues.

The decrease in total  revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003
is  attributable  to a decrease in rental revenue and a casualty gain recognized
during the six months ended June 30, 2002 (as discussed  below) partially offset
by an  increase in other  income.  During the three  months  ended June 30, 2003
other income remained  relatively  constant.  Rental revenue decreased primarily
due to a decrease in occupancy at Colony of Springdale  Apartments (as discussed
above).  Other income increased for the six months ended June 30, 2003 due to an
increase in net utility  reimbursements,  late charges,  and lease  cancellation
fees.

The casualty gain is related to a fire at the property in August 2001. A gain of
approximately $43,000 was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2001. An
additional gain of  approximately  $18,000 was recognized  during the six months
ended June 30,  2002 due to the  receipt of  additional  insurance  proceeds  of
approximately $19,000, net of the write off of additional undepreciated property
improvements  and  replacements  of  approximately  $1,000.  No such  gains were
recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2003.

Total expenses increased for the six months ended June 30, 2003 primarily due to
an  increase  in  operating  and  depreciation  expenses  partially  offset by a
decrease in general and  administrative  expenses.  Total expenses decreased for
the three months ended June 30, 2003 as increases in operating and  depreciation
expenses  were more than  offset by a  decrease  in general  and  administrative
expenses.  Operating  expenses  increased due to an increase in maintenance  and
property expenses partially offset by a decrease in management fees. Maintenance
expenses  increased  primarily due to an increase in contract  services and snow
removal expenses at the  Partnership's  property.  Property  expenses  increased
primarily due to an increase in utility expenses  partially offset by a decrease
in employee  salaries and related benefits and reduced  commissions and bonuses.
Management fees decreased due to decreased rental revenues at the  Partnership's
property.  Depreciation  expense  increased  due to  property  improvements  and
replacements  completed  during the twelve month period ended June 30, 2003 that
are now being depreciated.

General and administrative expenses decreased for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2003  primarily  due to a decrease in the cost of services  included in
the  management  reimbursements  to the  General  Partner as  allowed  under the
Partnership Agreement.  Also included in general and administrative  expenses at
June 30, 2003 are costs associated with the quarterly and annual  communications
with  investors  and  regulatory  agencies and the annual audit  required by the
Partnership Agreement.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner
monitors the rental market environment of its investment  property to assess the
feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and
protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the
General  Partner  attempts  to  protect  the  Partnership  from  the  burden  of
inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a
high overall occupancy level. However, due to changing market conditions,  which
can  result in the use of rental  concessions  and rental  reductions  to offset
softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the General Partner will
be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2003, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$119,000  compared  to  approximately  $93,000 at June 30,  2002.  Cash and cash
equivalents  decreased by  approximately  $59,000 since December 31, 2002 due to
approximately  $119,000  and  $76,000 of cash used in  investing  and  financing
activities,  respectively,  partially offset by  approximately  $136,000 of cash
provided by operating activities. Cash used in investing activities consisted of
property  improvements  and  replacements.  Cash  used in  financing  activities
consisted  of  principal   payments  made  on  the  mortgage   encumbering   the
Partnership's  property. The Partnership invests its working capital reserves in
interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal,  state,
and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  General  Partner  monitors
developments in the area of legal and regulatory  compliance and is studying new
federal laws,  including the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002  mandates  or suggests  additional  compliance  measures  with regard to
governance,  disclosure,  audit and other areas. In light of these changes,  the
Partnership  expects that it will incur higher  expenses  related to compliance,
including increased legal and audit fees. Capital  improvements  planned for the
Partnership's property are discussed below.

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2003,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately   $119,000  of  capital   expenditures  at  Colony  of  Springdale
Apartments,  consisting  primarily  of  structural  improvements,  parking  area
improvements,   roofing,   gutter,  and  floor  covering   replacements.   These
improvements were funded from operating cash flow. The Partnership evaluates the
capital  improvement needs of the property during the year and currently expects
to complete an  additional  $26,000 in capital  improvements  during  2003.  The
additional  capital  improvements  will  consist  of  floor  covering,  HVAC and
appliance  replacements  and  concrete  work.  Additional  improvements  may  be
considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well as
the anticipated cash flow generated by the property and Partnership reserves.

The  Partnership's  assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term  needs
(exclusive  of  capital   improvements)   of  the   Partnership.   The  mortgage
indebtedness of approximately  $5,118,000 matures December 1, 2019 at which time
the mortgage is scheduled to be fully amortized.

The Partnership did not make any distributions  during the six months ended June
30, 2003 and 2002.  Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net
cash generated from operations, the availability of cash reserves and the timing
of the debt maturity,  refinancing  and/or property sale. The Partnership's cash
available  for  distribution  is  reviewed on a monthly  basis.  There can be no
assurance that the Partnership  will generate  sufficient funds from operations,
after required  capital  expenditures,  to permit  distributions to its partners
during the remainder of 2003 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 91,747 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 50.61% of the outstanding Units at
June 30, 2003. A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender offers
made by AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is possible  that AIMCO or its  affiliates
will acquire  additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and
units in the operating  partnership of AIMCO either through private purchases or
tender offers.  Pursuant to the  Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders  holding a
majority of the Units are  entitled to take action with  respect to a variety of
matters that include,  but are not limited to,  voting on certain  amendments to
the Partnership  Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. As a result
of its ownership of 50.61% of the  outstanding  Units,  AIMCO and its affiliates
are  in a  position  to  control  all  voting  decisions  with  respect  to  the
Partnership.  Although the General Partner owes fiduciary  duties to the limited
partners of the  Partnership,  the General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to
AIMCO as its sole stockholder.  As a result,  the duties of the General Partner,
as general  partner,  to the Partnership and its limited  partners may come into
conflict  with  the  duties  of the  General  Partner  to  AIMCO,  as  its  sole
stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The  investment  property is recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's   investment  property.  These  factors  include  changes  in  the
national,  regional and local economic  climate;  local  conditions,  such as an
oversupply  of  multifamily   properties;   competition   from  other  available
multifamily  property  owners and changes in market  rental  rates.  Any adverse
changes in these factors could cause an impairment in the Partnership's assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized  monthly as it is earned and
the Partnership  fully reserves all  outstanding  balances over thirty days. The
Partnership will offer rental concessions during  particularly slow months or in
response to heavy  competition  from other  similar  complexes in the area.  Any
concessions  given at the inception of the lease are amortized  over the life of
the lease.

ITEM 3.     Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.

                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purported to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships  (including the Partnership) that are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time,  affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief,  including judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint, which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order  granting in part the  demurrer.  The Court  dismissed  without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General Partner and affiliated defendants opposed the motion. On April 29, 2002,
the Court held a hearing on plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took
the matter under submission after further briefing, as ordered by the court, was
submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002, the Court entered an order vacating
the trial date of  January  13,  2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and  discovery
cut-off dates) and stayed the case in its entirety  through  November 7, 2002 so
that the parties could have an opportunity to discuss settlement. On October 30,
2002, the court entered an order  extending the stay in effect  through  January
10, 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first  amended  complaint.  The  Heller  action  was  brought  as a  purported
derivative  action,  and  asserted  claims for,  among other  things,  breach of
fiduciary duty, unfair competition,  conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial
dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a motion to consolidate  the
Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that the Heller action was filed
in order to preserve the derivative  claims that were dismissed without leave to
amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated July 10, 2001. On October 5,
2001, the General  Partner and affiliated  defendants  moved to strike the first
amended  complaint in its entirety for violating the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes action,
or  alternatively,  to strike  certain  portions of the  complaint  based on the
statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants in the action demurred to the fourth
amended  complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to  strike  the  complaint.  On
December 11, 2001,  the court heard argument on the motions and took the matters
under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court  served  notice of its order
granting defendants' motion to strike the Heller complaint as a violation of its
July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On March 27,  2002,  the  plaintiffs
filed a notice  appealing the order  striking the complaint.  Before  completing
briefing on the appeal, the parties stayed further  proceedings in the appeal in
light of a settlement.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action described below.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make a tender
offer to purchase all of the partnership  interests in the  Partnerships  within
one year of final approval,  if it is granted,  and to provide partners with the
independent  appraisals at the time of these  tenders.  The proposed  settlement
also  provided  for the  limitation  of the  allowable  costs  which the General
Partner or its affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships in connection with this
litigation  and  imposes  limits  on the  class  counsel  fees and costs in this
litigation.  On April 11,  2003,  notice was  distributed  to  limited  partners
providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs,  associated with these cases will be material
to the Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

      a) Exhibits:

            3.1   Certificate of Limited Partnership,  incorporated by reference
                  to the Registration  Statement of Registrant filed October 22,
                  1984, as amended to date.

            3.2   Agreement of Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to
                  the  Registration  Statement of  Registrant  filed October 22,
                  1984, as amended to date.

            31.1  Certification   of  equivalent  of  Chief  Executive   Officer
                  pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
                  as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
                  of 2002.

            31.2  Certification   of  equivalent  of  Chief  Financial   Officer
                  pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
                  as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
                  of 2002.

            32.1  Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as Adopted
                  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      b) Reports on Form 8-K:

            None filed during the quarter ended June 30, 2003.




<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI


                                    By:   CONCAP EQUITIES, INC.
                                          General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Accounting Officer


                                    Date: August 13, 2003


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Patrick J. Foye, certify that:


1.    I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Consolidated
      Capital Properties VI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2003

                                /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                Patrick J. Foye
                                Executive  Vice  President  of ConCap  Equities,
                                Inc.,  equivalent of the chief executive officer
                                of the Partnership


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Paul J. McAuliffe, certify that:


1.    I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Consolidated
      Capital Properties VI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2003

                                /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                Paul J. McAuliffe
                                Executive  Vice  President  and Chief  Financial
                                Officer of ConCap Equities,  Inc., equivalent of
                                the chief financial officer of the Partnership



<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated  Capital
Properties VI (the "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  Patrick J. Foye, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of
the Partnership, and Paul J. McAuliffe, as the equivalent of the chief financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Name:  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Date:  August 13, 2003


                                           /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Name:  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Date:  August 13, 2003



This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.