23622 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by June 19, 2012. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements and Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: April 11, 2012. 

A. Stanley Meiburg, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart B—Alabama 

■ 2. Section 52.50(c) is amended by 

revising the heading for ‘‘Chapter No. 

335–3–20,’’ and the entries for ‘‘Section 

335–3–20–.01,’’ ‘‘Section 335–3–20– 

.02,’’ and ‘‘Section 335–3–20-.03’’ to 

read as follows: 

§ 52.50 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA APPROVED ALABAMA REGULATIONS

State citation Title/subject State effective 

date EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

Chapter No. 335–3–20 Reserved 

Section 335–3–20–.01 .................... Reserved ........................................ 4/3/12 4/20/12 [Insert citation of publication]. 

Section 335–3–20–.02 .................... Reserved ........................................ 4/3/12 4/20/12 [Insert citation of publication]. 

Section 335–3–20–.03 .................... Reserved ........................................ 4/3/12 4/20/12 [Insert citation of publication]. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2012–9446 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0944; FRL–9648–6] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois; 

Leisure Properties LLC/D/B/A 

Crownline Boats; Adjusted Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving into the 

Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

an adjusted standard for Leisure 

Properties LLC/D/B/A Crownline Boats 

(Crownline) at its West Frankfort, 

Illinois facility. On June 10, 2011, the 

Illinois Environmental Protection 

Agency (IEPA) submitted to EPA for 

approval an adjustment to the general 

rule, Use of Organic Material Rule, 

commonly known as the eight pound 

per hour (8 lb/hr) rule, as it applies to 

emissions of volatile organic matter 

(VOM) from Crownline’s manufacturing 

facility. The adjusted standard relieves 

Crownline from being subject to the 

general rule for VOM emissions from its 

West Frankfort facility. EPA is 

approving this SIP revision because it 

will not interfere with attainment or 

maintenance of the ozone National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(NAAQS). 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective June 19, 2012, unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by May 21, 

2012. If adverse comments are received, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final rule in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2011–0944, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312)692–2450. 

4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, 

Control Strategies Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, 

Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 23623 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2011– 

0944. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone Carolyn 

Persoon, Environmental Engineer, at 

(312)353–8290, before visiting the 

Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carolyn Persoon, Environmental 

Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312)353–8290, 

persoon.carolyn@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What is EPA’s analysis of Crownline’s 

adjusted standard? 

II. What action is EPA taking? 

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is EPA’s analysis of Crownline’s 

adjusted standard? 

Background of the 8 lb/hr Rule and the 

Adjusted Standard 

EPA approved the VOM general 8 lb/ 

hr rule into the Illinois SIP on February 

21, 1980 (45 FR 11472). The rule states 

that ‘‘no person shall cause or allow the 

discharge of more than 3.6 kg/hr (8 lb/ 

hr) of organic material into the 

atmosphere from any emission source 

* * *’’ The basis for this rule is 

prevention of ground-level ozone 

formation in order to meet the ozone 

NAAQS. 

Crownline filed a petition for an 

adjusted standard on December 5, 2003, 

in accordance with section 28.1 of the 

Illinois Environmental Protection Act, 

415 ILCS 5/28.1, and Illinois’ 

regulations at 35 Ill. Adm. Code section 

215. Section 28.1 sets out the factors 

that a petitioner must demonstrate to 

justify an adjusted standard. Crownline 

filed the petition describing the factors 

relating to its West Frankfort facility 

that are substantially and significantly 

different from the factors relied on in 

adopting the general rule, specifically 

that the general rule did not take into 

account the specific operations needed 

to make fiberglass boats. Crownline also 

provided an air quality impact analysis 

to support its petition. On April 23, 

2004, the Illinois Pollution Control 

Board (IPCB) held a public hearing on 

the petition in West Frankfort, Illinois 

where testimony was given to support 

Crownline’s petition. A final order by 

the IPCB granted Crownline an adjusted 

standard on July 22, 2004. Among other 

things, the IPCB order stated that 

Crownline must operate in full 

compliance with the Federal Maximum 

Achievable Control Technology (MACT) 

limits on volatile organic compounds 

(VOCs) for the specific production of 

fiberglass boats. 

Analysis of SIP Revision for the 

Adjusted Standard 

EPA’s approval is based on 

consideration of whether the adjusted 

standard meets the requirements of 

section 1l0(l) of the Clean Air Act 

(CAA), 42 U.S.C. 4202(l). In particular, 

EPA considered whether exempting 

Crownline’s West Frankfort facility from 

compliance with 35 Ill. Adm. Code 

215.301 will impact Illinois’ ability to 

attain and maintain the ozone NAAQS 

in the area in which the facility is 

located. 

Under CAA section 110(l) the state 

must show that the SIP revision will not 

interfere with attainment and 

maintenance of both existing eight-hour 

ozone standards, which would be 75 

parts per billion (ppb) promulgated in 

2008 and the 84 ppb promulgated in 

1997. The monitor closest to 

Crownline’s West Frankfort facility is 

located in Hamilton County, Illinois. 

This monitor has been and currently is 

attaining the eight-hour ozone standards 

with a design value of 68 ppb for the 

2008–2010 design period. See EPA’s 

Web site on design values for ozone at 

http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/ 

values.html. The IPCB order granting 

Crownline an adjusted standard became 

effective in July 2004 and Crownline has 

been operating in accordance with this 

adjusted standard since that time. As 

noted, the 2008–2010 design value for 

Hamilton County shows that the county 

is attaining the 2008 eight-hour ozone 

standard with Crownline operating in 

accordance with the adjusted standard. 

Thus, Crownline’s facility in West 

Frankfort, Illinois has not been 

interfering with attainment. 

To support its petition, Crownline did 

a conservative analysis of emissions to 

determine an approximate ozone 

contribution that would result from it 

operating at the maximum capacity 

which Crownline is allowed in its 

approved title V permit. EPA reviewed 

Crownline’s analysis for the one-hour 

ozone standard and applied this 

analysis to the eight-hour ozone 

standard. When adding the potential 

contribution from Crownline to the 

existing monitored design value of 68 

ppb, the 2008 eight-hour ozone standard 

of 75 ppb is still maintained even at the 

facility’s maximum permitted emissions 

allowance. 

Although Crownline is not required to 

comply with the 8 lb/hour rule, 

Crownline is required to operate its 

facility in compliance with Federal 

regulations of the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
23624 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

1 ‘‘Emission standards promulgated under this 

subsection shall require the maximum degree of 

reduction in emissions of the hazardous air 

pollutants subject to this section.’’ Section 

112(d)(2). 

for Boat Manufacturing set forth at 40 

CFR part 63 subpart VVVV. These 

regulations establish emission standards 

for hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) at 

new and existing boat manufacturing 

facilities with resin and gel coat 

operations, carpet and fabric adhesive 

operations, or aluminum recreational 

boat surface coating operations and 

require certain operational practices, 

recordkeeping, and emission limits for 

HAPs. EPA promulgated these 

regulations under section 112(d) of the 

CAA, which contains the MACT 

requirement.1 Styrene is the VOM 

emitted from Crownline’s West 

Frankfort facility and styrene is also a 

HAP. The emissions of styrene from 

Crownline’s West Frankfort facility are 

from two different types of operations: 

(1) Lamination process which uses a 

resin applied by non-atomized spray, 

and (2) open molding, resistant and/or 

high strength gel-coat. The MACT 

requires emission limits on the 

materials used in these processes, with 

HAPs content limited to 35% for the 

resin applied by non-atomized guns, 

and 33.4% HAPs for the gelcoat 

composition. These emission limits are 

enforceable VOM limits for the West 

Frankfort Facility. 

II. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is approving into the Illinois SIP 

an adjusted standard of the 8 lb/hr 

general rule for VOM for Crownline. 

The adjusted standard sets an 

alternative permanent and enforceable 

VOM limit for Crownline that are the 

emission limits set in the Federal MACT 

(40 CFR part 63 subpart VVVV) specific 

to fiberglass boat manufacturing. The 

amendment to Illinois’ SIP adding the 

adjusted standard is approvable because 

the adjusted standard will not interfere 

with attaining or maintaining the 75 ppb 

ozone standard as prescribed by section 

110(l) of the CAA. 

We are publishing this action without 

prior proposal because we view this as 

a noncontroversial amendment and 

anticipate no adverse comments. 

However, in the proposed rules section 

of this Federal Register publication, we 

are publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposal to approve the 

state plan amendment if relevant 

adverse written comments are filed. 

This rule will be effective June 19, 2012 

without further notice unless we receive 

relevant adverse written comments by 

May 21, 2012. If we receive such 

comments, we will withdraw this action 

before the effective date by publishing a 

subsequent document that will 

withdraw the final action. All public 

comments received will then be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on the proposed action. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

Please note that if EPA receives an 

adverse comment on an amendment, 

paragraph, or section of this rule and if 

that provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. If we do not receive any 

comments, this action will be effective 

June 19, 2012. 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements. For 

that reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 

5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by June 19, 2012. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of today’s Federal Register, rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 23625 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: February 29, 2012. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart O—Illinois 

■ 2. Section 52.720 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(190) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.720 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(190) On June 10, 2011, the Illinois 

Environmental Protection Agency 

submitted a revision to its state 

implementation plan. The revision to 

the SIP allows an adjusted standard to 

the general rule, Use of Organic Material 

Rule, known as the eight pound per 

hour (8 lb/hr) rule, for volatile 

organic matter, for Leisure Properties 

LLC/D/B/A Crownline Boats 

manufacturing facility located in West 

Frankfort, Illinois. The adjusted 

standard is that the facility takes an 

alternative standard of the emission 

limit requirements set forth in the 

MACT under 40 CFR part 63 subpart 

VVVV as published in 40 CFR Part 63 

(§ 63.1200 to end) revised as of July 1, 

2002. 

(i) Incorporation by reference. 

(A) July 22, 2004, Opinion and Order 

of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, 

AS–04–01, (identified in error as July 

22, 2002 in the document heading), 

effective July 22, 2004. 

(ii) Additional material. 

(A) Letter from Laurel L. Kroack, 

Illinois Environmental Protection 

Agency, to Cheryl Newton, EPA, dated 

September 2, 2011, identifying that due 

to an ownership change to Crownline 

Boats, the Board transferred the 

adjusted standard to Leisure Properties 

LLC D/B/A Crownline Boats, which is 

the successor to Crownline Boats, by 

Board order AS04–l, effective October 7, 

2010. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9440 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–1018; FRL–9340–5] 

Quizalofop Ethyl; Pesticide Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes 

tolerances for residues of quizalofop 

ethyl in or on multiple commodities 

which are identified and discussed later 

in this document. This regulation 

additionally removes established 

tolerances on canola seed and canola 

meal, as they will be superseded by new 

tolerances. Finally, this regulation 

removes several time-limited tolerances, 

as they have expired. Interregional 

Research Project Number 4 (IR–4) 

requested these tolerances, under the 

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 

(FFDCA). 

DATES: This regulation is effective April 

20, 2012. Objections and requests for 

hearings must be received on or before 

June 19, 2012, and must be filed in 

accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also 

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under docket 

identification (ID) number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2010–1018. All documents in the 

docket are listed in the docket index 

available at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available in the electronic docket at 

http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only 

available in hard copy, at the OPP 

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S– 

4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 

2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The 

Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. 

to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The Docket 

Facility telephone number is (703) 305– 

5805. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laura Nollen, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

(703) 305–7390; email address: 

nollen.laura@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. Potentially 

affected entities may include, but are 

not limited to those engaged in the 

following activities: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

This listing is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather to provide a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

affected by this action. Other types of 

entities not listed in this unit could also 

be affected. The North American 

Industrial Classification System 

(NAICS) codes have been provided to 

assist you and others in determining 

whether this action might apply to 

certain entities. If you have any 

questions regarding the applicability of 

this action to a particular entity, consult 

the person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of EPA’s tolerance 

regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through 

the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR 

site at http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/ 

text/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/ 

Title40/40tab_02.tpl. To access the 

harmonized test guidelines referenced 

in this document electronically, please 

go to http://www.epa.gov/ocspp and 

select ‘‘Test Methods and Guidelines,’’ 

which is listed under ‘‘Documents 

related to our mission.’’ 

C. How can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2010–1018 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES