alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 5:91cr5008LAC

 

THOMAS LEE STEPHENS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on September 29, 2005

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION TO RECALL REFERRAL AND ORDER DATED 9/6/05

Filed byDEFENDANT PRO SE on 9/15/05 Doc.# 198

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

/s/ / Mary Maloy-Wells

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy-Wells

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 3rd day of

October, 2005, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 5:91-cr-05008-WS-CAS Document 199 Filed 10/03/05 Page 1 of 1
§ 3430.307 Coordination and stakeholder input requirements. ( a ) *Stakeholder input.* In making grants under this Part, NIFA shall solicit and consider input from persons who conduct or use agricultural research, extension, or education in accordance with section 102(b) of the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998 (7 U.S.C. 7612(b)).
( b ) *Allocation of funds to high-priority research.* To the maximum extent practicable, the Secretary, in coordination with the Under Secretary, shall allocate grants under this subpart to high-priority research as defined in section 1672 of Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, 7 U.S.C. 5925. NIFA shall take into consideration, when available, the determinations made by the Advisory Board.
#### § 51.1523 U.S. No. 2.

“U.S. No. 2” consists of plums or prunes of one variety which are not badly misshapen, which are clean, mature but not overripe or soft or shriveled; which are free from decay and sunscald, and free from serious damage caused by broken skins, heat injury, growth cracks, sunburn, split pits, hail marks, drought spots, gum spots, russeting, scars, other disease, insects or mechanical or other means. (*See* § 51.1525.)
Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William Tay, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Stoneleigh Acquisition
Corp. for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
we have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and
the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors:

      (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the
internal controls which could adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the small business issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
controls.

Date: February 9, 2007


/s/ William Tay
------------------------------------
Signature:
Title: William Tay, President
       Principal Executive Officer & Principal Accounting Officer
#### § 3570.283 Exception authority.

The Administrator may make an exception to any requirement or provision of this subpart, if such an exception is necessary to implement the intent of the authorizing statutes in a time of national emergency or in accordance with a Presidentially-declared disaster, or on a case-by-case basis, when such an exception is in the best financial interest of the Federal Government and is otherwise not in conflict with applicable laws. No exceptions, however, will be granted for Applicant, Ultimate Recipient, or Project eligibility.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 74146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30074]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from 
McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, P.C. on behalf of the State of Montana 
(WB10-069(1)), for permission to use certain data from the Board's 2006 
through 2009 (when available) Carload Waybill Sample. This request was 
made pursuant to 49 CFR 1244.9(b)(4) because it is related to a 
proceeding before the Board, State of Montana v. BNSF Railway Company, 
NOR 42124. Because some of the waybill information requested is from 
entities not party to this proceeding (i.e., Union Pacific Railroad 
Company and Canadian Pacific Railway Company), the Board is providing 
notice and an opportunity to comment on the request. (The Board's 
regulations do not specifically require Federal Register notice for 
this category of request.) A copy of the request may be obtained from 
the Office of Economics. See the contact listed below.
    The Board will follow its procedures set forth in 49 CFR 1244.9(d) 
for handling this waybill sample request. The waybill sample contains 
confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any party objects 
to this request, it should file the objections with the Director of the 
Board's Office of Economics within 14 calendar days of the publication 
of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 
49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Scott Decker, (202) 245-0330.

Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010-30074 Filed 11-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
```
11.501 Policy.       (a)                    						            The contracting officer must consider the potential impact on pricing, competition, and contract administration before using a liquidated damages clause. Use liquidated damages clauses only when-                                                         (1)                          								                The time of delivery or timely performance is so important that the Government may reasonably expect to suffer damage if the delivery or performance is delinquent; and                                                            (2)                          								                The extent or amount of such damage would be difficult or impossible to estimate accurately or prove.                                                                             (b)                    						            Liquidated damages are not punitive and are not negative performance incentives (see 16.402-2). Liquidated damages are used to compensate the Government for probable damages. Therefore, the liquidated damages rate must be a reasonable forecast of just compensation for the harm that is caused by late delivery or untimely performance of the particular contract. Use a maximum amount or a maximum period for assessing liquidated damages if these limits reflect the maximum probable damage to the Government. Also, the contracting officer may use more than one liquidated damages rate when the contracting officer expects the probable damage to the Government to change over the contract period of performance.                                          (c)                    						            The contracting officer must take all reasonable steps to mitigate liquidated damages. If the contract contains a liquidated damages clause and the contracting officer is considering terminating the contract for default, the contracting officer should seek expeditiously to obtain performance by the contractor or terminate the contract and repurchase (see subpart  49.4). Prompt contracting officer action will prevent excessive loss to defaulting contractors and protect the interests of the Government.                                          (d)                    						            The head of the agency may reduce or waive the amount of liquidated damages assessed under a contract, if the Commissioner, Financial Management Service, or designee approves (see Treasury Order 145-10).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 11.5 - Liquidated Damages
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000757545
<NAME> 84A
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         144,868
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,921
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               347,789
<PP&E>                                      18,233,645
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,217,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,363,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,124
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,309,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,363,838
<SALES>                                        573,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               576,700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  531,921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 44,779
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             44,779
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,779
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Summary of Named Executive Officer & Director Compensation Arrangements


 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 Summary of Named Executive Officer & Director Compensation Arrangements 
  

							
	 Name of Director/Named Executive Officer

	  	 Annual Base Salary
 Effective March 20, 2005

	  	 Cash Award
 Payable March 2005


	 Donald G. Fisher
	  	$	544,700	  	$	162,559
	 Paul Pressler
	  	$	1,500,000	  	$	1,119,140
	 Nick Cullen
	  	$	600,000	  	$	376,103
	 Anne Gust
	  	$	600,000	  	$	232,781
	 Jenny Ming
	  	$	1,000,000	  	$	0
	 Byron Pollitt
	  	$	675,000	  	$	259,268

  
 The above individuals are also
eligible to receive equity compensation awards under the company’s employee benefit plans and certain perquisites as more fully described in the company’s annual proxy statement.
§ 400.412 Record retention. ( a ) FCIC or the insurance provider will retain all records of policyholders for a period of not less than 3 years from the date of final action on a policy for the crop year, unless further maintenance of specific records is requested by FCIC. Final actions on insurance policies include conclusion of insurance events, such as the latest of termination of the policy, completion of loss adjustment, or satisfaction of claim.
( b ) The statute of limitations for FCIC contract claims may permit litigation to be instituted after the period of record retention. Destruction of records prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations will not provide a defense to any action by FCIC against any private insurance company.
[62 FR 28609, May 27, 1997]
#### § 51.1316 Clean.

*Clean* means free from excessive dirt, dust, spray residue or other foreign material.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Quarterly Report of Analytica Bio-Energy Corp., on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Luiz Brasil, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and March 31, 2014 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Analytica Bio-Energy Corp.  May 14, 2014By:/s/ Luiz BrasilLuiz BrasilPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

__________________________ 

CHRISTOPHER A. FINGER, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, 

Respondent. 

__________________________ 

2012-3122 

__________________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in case no. AT3330110522-I-1. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION 

__________________________ 

O R D E R 

Christopher A. Finger moves without opposition for a 

58-day extension of time, until January 9, 2013, to file his 

reply brief. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Case: 12-3122 Document: 48 Page: 1 Filed: 12/06/2012
FINGER V. MSPB 2

The motion is granted. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk 

s27 

Case: 12-3122 Document: 48 Page: 2 Filed: 12/06/2012
#### §§ 4280.45-4280.46 [Reserved]
#### In re CHAPMAN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 22, 1906.)

In the matter of the application of *1110Charles MeC. Chapman for admission to the bar.

No opinion. i\lotion granted.
2009 Salary Reduction Letter from Colleen B. Brown, dated February 27, 2009



 Exhibit 10.1 
 [Fisher Letterhead] 
  

			
	 DATE:
	  	February 27, 2009
		
	 TO:
	  	Compensation Committee Members
		
	 FROM:
	  	Colleen B. Brown
		
	 RE:
	  	Voluntary Salary Reduction

 Consistent with my communication to the Board in early December and to the shareholders in late December, this
letter will serve as formal notification to the Committee of my decision to take a voluntary 10% reduction in base salary for the 2009 compensation period. 
 This is in response to the worsening economic conditions the country is experiencing and its resulting impact on advertising. 
 I am also very
pleased to inform you that Rob Dunlop is joining me in this effort by volunteering to reduce his salary by 10% for 2009. In addition, there are 25 other officers, managers, and employees who have joined together in an effort to help reduce expenses
in 2009 and have taken similar voluntary reductions. 
 I am personally touched by the number of dedicated people that have chosen voluntarily to reduce
their salaries or have foregone merit increases contractually due them, in an effort to do their part in helping Fisher through a very economically challenging environment. I think it speaks volumes to the spirit of this organization and the loyalty
and commitment these individuals have demonstrated to seeing our mission through. 
 We have taken significant steps to control operating expenses and are
pursuing additional ways to drive revenue and opportunity while reducing costs. We are faced with limited visibility for the year and anticipate extensive continued pressure on our business for the near term. 
 Please let me know if you have any questions.
#### § 4279.283 Refusal to execute Loan Note Guarantee.

If the Agency determines that it cannot execute the Loan Note Guarantee, the Agency will inform the Lender, in writing, of the reasons and give the Lender a reasonable period within which to satisfy the objections. If the Lender satisfies the objections within the time allowed, the Agency will issue the Loan Note Guarantee. If the Lender requests additional time in writing and within the period allowed, the Agency may grant the request.
#### In the Matter of John A. Lally, Petitioner, v. William S. Hults, Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.

Determination unanimously confirmed, without costs (See *People*v. *Blake,*5 N Y 2d 118; *Matter of Prudhomme*v. *Hults,*27 A D 2d 234.) (Review of determination revoking driver’s license, transferred by order of Onondaga Special Term.) Present—■ Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Del Veechio and Marsh, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lou Jurinak, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Gryphon Resources Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:				          (1)  The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.*/s/ Lou Jurinak*Lou Jurinak					Chief Executive Officer				Chief Financial Officer				December 17, 2007				A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

****

----
Editorial Note on Part 47
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 64 FR 38108, July 15, 1999.

§ 47.22 Argument before Secretary. ( a ) *Oral argument.* There shall be no right to oral argument other than as provided in § 47.15(h).
( b ) *Briefs.* The Secretary will consider any proposed findings of fact, conclusions, and orders, statements of objections, and briefs filed as provided in § 47.19(b). Briefs filed in accordance with § 47.19(c) and those filed in support of statements of fact will also be considered by the Secretary.
[10 FR 2209, Feb. 27, 1945, as amended at 12 FR 1026, Feb. 13, 1947; 60 FR 8462, Feb. 14, 1995]
#### § 4287.124 Alterations of loan instruments.

The lender must neither alter nor approve any alterations or modifications of any loan instrument without the prior written approval of the Agency.
§ 51.2116 Similar varietal characteristics. *Similar varietal characteristics* means that the kernels are similar in shape and appearance. For example, long types shall not be mixed with short types, or broad types mixed with narrow types, and bitter almonds shall not be mixed with sweet almonds. Color of the kernels shall not be considered, since there is often a marked difference in skin color of kernels of the same variety. ( a ) When a lot is specified as “one type,” all kernels shall be the same in shape and appearance; and,
( b ) When a lot is specified and carton marked as “California,” kernels present may include any one or a combination of blanchable varieties within the “California” Marketing Classification. In addition, Nonpareil or similar types may be included provided that it does not exceed twenty-five percent (25%), by weight, of the lot.
§ 407.8 The application and policy. ( a ) Application for insurance, developed in accordance with standards established by FCIC, must be made by any person who wishes to participate in the program in order to cover such person's share in the insured crop as landlord, owner-operator, tenant, or other crop ownership interest. ( 1 ) No other person's interest in the crop may be insured under the application.
( 2 ) To obtain coverage, the application must be submitted to the insurance provider on or before the applicable sales closing date on file in the insurance provider's local office.
( b ) FCIC or the insurance provider may reject, no longer accept applications, or cancel existing insurance contracts upon the FCIC's determination that the insurance risk is excessive. Such determination must be made not later than 15 days before the cancellation date for the crop and may be made on an area, county, state, or crop basis.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BRUCE L. SMALL,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20cv499-TKW-MJF

STATE OF FLORIDA LEGISLATION, 

et al.,

Defendants.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 5) and Plaintiff’s objection (Doc. 8). The Court reviewed 

the issues raised in the objection de novo as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), and 

based on that review, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge that this case should 

be dismissed with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §1915A(b) and Heck v. Humphrey, 512 

U.S. 477 (1994).1 The Court did not overlook that Plaintiff purported to “amend[] 

his claim” in the objection by making additional allegations, see Doc. 8, at 2-3, but 

1

 Based on this conclusion, the Court need not address the magistrate judge’s alternative 

finding that dismissal is warranted based on Plaintiff’s failure to pay the partial filing fee. 

However, it is noteworthy that the Court has no record of receiving the $10 filing fee that, 

according to the receipt attached to Plaintiff’s objection (Doc. 8, at 6), was withdrawn from his 

prison account on November 3, 2020.

Case 4:20-cv-00499-TKW-MAF Document 9 Filed 12/18/20 Page 1 of 2
2

those allegations do not cure the deficiencies in the complaint that were detailed in 

the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s objection to the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice, and the Clerk shall close the 

file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of December, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00499-TKW-MAF Document 9 Filed 12/18/20 Page 2 of 2