alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2363 

To extend the educational flexibility program under section 4 of the Education 

Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2006 

Mr. BURR (for himself, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. 

SALAZAR, Mr. CARPER, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. KENNEDY, 

Mr. KERRY, Mrs. DOLE, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. CORNYN, 

Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. WYDEN, and Mr. FRIST) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To extend the educational flexibility program under section 

4 of the Education Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EDUCATIONAL FLEXIBILITY PROGRAM EXTEN4 SION. 

5 (a) EXTENSION AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding any 

6 other provision of law, the Secretary of Education is au7 thorized to carry out the educational flexibility program 

8 under section 4 of the Education Flexibility Partnership 

9 Act of 1999 (20 U.S.C. 5891b), until the date of enactVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:17 Mar 03, 2006 Jkt 049196 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2363.CPS S2363

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 2363 CPS

1 ment of an Act that reauthorizes programs under part A 

2 of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

3 of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311 et seq.), for any State that was 

4 an Ed-Flex Partnership State on September 30, 2004. 

5 (b) DESIGNATION.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Any designation of a State 

7 as an Ed-Flex Partnership State that was in effect 

8 on September 30, 2004, shall be extended until the 

9 date of enactment of an Act that reauthorizes pro10 grams under part A of title I of the Elementary and 

11 Secondary Education Act of 1965, if the Secretary 

12 of Education makes the determination described in 

13 paragraph (2). 

14 (2) DETERMINATION.—The determination re15 ferred to in paragraph (1) is a determination that 

16 the performance of the State educational agency, in 

17 carrying out the programs for which the State has 

18 received a waiver under the educational flexibility 

19 program, justifies the extension of the designation. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### DONNELLY, Appellant, v. HELLMAN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by John H. Donnelly against Myer Hellman,

No opinion. Motion denied.
# 19.805 Competitive 8(a).

- 19.805-1 General. 
- 19.805-2 Procedures. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 19.8 - Contracting with the Small Business Administration (The 8(a) Program)
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Zoo Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Form
10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  May
17, 2010




/s/
      Mark SeremetMark
      Seremet
                President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)




Date:  May
17, 2010





/s/
      David FremedDavid
      FremedChief
      Financial Officer
                (Principal
      Financial Officer)
§ 5001.456 Other fees. The Agency has the authority and may at its discretion charge additional fees in order to maintain adequate levels of program funding. Prior to the Agency charging any additional fees, the Agency will publish a notice of those fees in the Federal Register in accordance with § 5001.10. All fees will be disclosed in the conditional commitment specific to the project as issued to the lender at the time approval. ( a ) Until the loan note guarantee is canceled by the Agency, any delinquent fees will bear interest at the promissory note rate.
( b ) Lenders are prohibited from selling any portion of the guaranteed loan on the secondary market if there are unpaid fees.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                      Washington, D.C. 20549

                            FORM 10-Q/A

       QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF
               THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




For Quarter Ended June 30, 1996                File No. 0-12993




                         TELS Corporation

      (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



        Utah                                             87-0373840

(State or other jurisdiction of                     (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization)                       Identification No.)



406 West South Jordan Parkway, Suite 250, South Jordan, Utah       84095
(Address of principal executive offices)                          Zip Code



Registrant's telephone number, including area code     (801) 571-1182




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed  by  Section  13 or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter  period that the  registrant
was  required  to file such  reports),  and (2) has been  subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.


    YES      X        NO



Shares of common stock outstanding on July 31, 1996       3,899,819

<PAGE>


                                TELS Corporation

                                     INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION                                 Page 


          Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, 1996 
           and December 31, 1995                                3

          Consolidated Statements of Operations - Six 
            and Three Months Ended June 30, 1996 and 
            1995, respectively                                  4

          Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Six  
            Months Ended June 30, 1996 and 1995, 
            respectively                                        5

          Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements            6

          Management's Discussion and Analysis of 
           Financial Condition and Results of Operations       7,8

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

          Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of 
                   Security Holders                             9

          Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K              9


SIGNATURES                                                     10


 
<PAGE>












                                TELS Corporation

                                   Signatures


      Pursuant ot the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934,  the
Registrant  has  duly  caused  this  report  to  be  signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized. 


                                                 TELS Corporation 

Dated: October 16, 1996                        By: /s/ Stephen M. Nelson 
                                                   Stephen M. Nelson, President

Dated: October 16, 1996                        By: /s/ Deborah Walford
                                                   Deborah Walford, Controller

<PAGE>
§ 3560.661 Sale or transfers. ( a ) If a sale or transfer is to take place in conjunction with the Agency incentive offer, the sale or transfer must comply with the processing provisions of subpart I of this part.
( b ) If a proposed transferee is determined not to be eligible for the transfer and assumption, the borrower will be given an additional 45 days to find another transferee.
( c ) In cases where the existing owner is in program non-compliance or default, the Agency may make an offer of incentives contingent on the successful transfer of the housing to an acceptable purchaser. The Agency may offer a smaller incentive or no incentive if the borrower does not agree to transfer the project to an acceptable purchaser, or if the transfer does not take place.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              SEP-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.3685
<CASH>                                       1,777,889
<SECURITIES>                                 3,577,151
<RECEIVABLES>                                  602,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                    39,000
<INVENTORY>                                    631,171
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,061,815
<PP&E>                                       2,983,339
<DEPRECIATION>                                 535,402
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,883,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          975,659
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,523
<COMMON>                                       150,187
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,715,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,883,093
<SALES>                                        148,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,318,251
<CGS>                                          298,243
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,505,673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                54,990
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,004,059
<INCOME-TAX>                                   463,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            541,059
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   541,059
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*April 24, 2006*

[Cite as *04/24/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-1978.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2003-1572.

#### State ex rel. Howard v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 97AP-860. This cause came on for further consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to file a motion to invoke Section 38 of Article II of the Ohio Constitution against Chief Justice Moyer. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave is denied.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01206**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 01206\01206_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 01206\01206_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 01206\01206_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 01206\01206_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01206\01206_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01206\01206_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01206\01206_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01206\01206_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 01206\Supplemental Documents\01206_IPL's Response to EPA ICR_IPL_091510.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 01206\Supplemental Documents\01206_KAP A5-2 MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01206\Supplemental Documents\01206_KAP A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01206\Supplemental Documents\01206_KAP A5-3 WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01206\Supplemental Documents\01206_KAP C3-29.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 01206\Supplemental Documents\01206_KAP Certification - Signed by Terry Kouba.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 01206\Supplemental Documents\01206_KAP D2-3 Pond1 Ash Pond Redesign.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01206\Supplemental Documents\01206_KAP D2-3 Pond2 Ash Pond Redesign.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01206\Supplemental Documents\01206_KAP D3-1 D-1 and D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#  Federal Acquisition Regulation

- Part 5 - Publicizing Contract Actions 
- Part 6 - Competition Requirements 
- Part 7 - Acquisition Planning 
- Part 8 - Required Sources of Supplies and Services 
- Part 9 - Contractor Qualifications 
- Part 10 - Market Research 
- Part 11 - Describing Agency Needs 
- Part 12 - Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services 

**Parent topic:**Subchapter B - Competition and Acquisition Planning
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


The undersigned, Roger S. Huntington, Chief Financial Officer of SurgiCare,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certifies that:

(1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:    November 18, 2004

By:             /S/ Roger S. Huntington
                -----------------------
                Roger S. Huntington, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Material Sciences Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Clifford D.
Nastas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



July 2, 2008By:

/s/ Clifford D. NastasClifford D. NastasChief Executive Officer


In connection with the Report, I, James M. Froisland, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief
Information Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



July 2, 2008By:

/s/ James M. FroislandJames M. FroislandSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Information Officer and Corporate Secretary
§ 3560.207 Annual adjustment factors for Section 8 units. ( a ) *General.* For rental units receiving project-based Section 8 assistance, the Agency will review rents annually without regard to HUD's automatic annual adjustment.
( b ) *Establishing rents in housing with HUD rent assistance.* Borrowers will set basic, note, and HUD contract rents for housing receiving HUD project-based Section 8 assistance, as specified in § 3560.202(c).
( c ) *Excess HUD rents.* When permitted by the Agency interest credit agreement, the Agency may reduce or cancel the interest credit on the housing, if excess HUD rents deposited in the reserve account result in the reserve account being funded beyond the fully funded level approved by the Agency.
[69 FR 69106, Nov. 26, 2004, as amended at 87 FR 11282, Mar. 1, 2022]
#### LUTGEN, Respondent, v. KRUSE, Appellant

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 10, 1906.)

Action by George Lutgen against Frederick Kruse.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

McLennan, P. j., and NASH, J., dissent
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:89cr4006-WS

KENNETH GASTON,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 745)

docketed April 5, 2005. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's motion

to correct illegal sentence be summarily dismissed. The defendant has filed objections

(doc. 747) to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, the court has determined that the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation must be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 745) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

Case 4:89-cr-04006-WS-WCS Document 748 Filed 04/21/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:89cr4006-WS

2. The defendant's motion (doc. 744) to correct illegal sentence is hereby

summarily DISMISSED.

DONE AND ORDERED this April 21, 2005.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:89-cr-04006-WS-WCS Document 748 Filed 04/21/05 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:95-cr-01007-MMP

GARY FLOWERS,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 318, Motion for Jail-Time Credits, filed by

Defendant Flowers. In his motion, Defendant seeks sixty-four days removed from his twelvemonth sentence for time spent in federal custody while awaiting sentencing for his violation of

supervised release. As Defendant was incarcerated by the Florida Department of Corrections at

that time, and received credit on his state sentence for the time spent in federal custody, the

Court finds that Defendant is not entitled to any credit in his federal sentence. Accordingly,

Defendant’s Motion for Jail-Time Credits, Doc. 318, is denied. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of November, 2006

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:95-cr-01007-MP Document 319 Filed 12/01/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report
of Sputnik Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ David LaDukeName:
                David
      LaDukeTitle:
                President,
      Chief Executive Officer, andTreasurer





May 12,
2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Sputnik Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Sputnik Enterprises, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER JON PERGROSSI,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20cv181-MW/GRJ

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

CREATING AMERICAN

PROFESSIONAL SPORTS,

Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Omnibus 

Order to Show Cause and Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 4, and has also 

reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation.1 ECF 

No. 6.

Plaintiff filed 33 cases over a four-day period, from August 17 through August 

20, 2020. These cases were assigned to three U. S. District Judges in the Northern 

District of Florida. The cases are frivolous. Understandably, the Magistrate Judge 

1 Plaintiff filed a document in Case No. 1:20cv181-MW/GRJ, ECF No. 6, which this Court has 

construed as an omnibus response to the Order to Show Cause and as objections to the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones, ECF No. 4.

Case 1:20-cv-00181-MW-GRJ Document 7 Filed 09/23/20 Page 1 of 2
2

found this extraordinary volume of frivolous cases merits the imposition of 

restrictions on future filings in order to preserve scarce judicial resources and protect 

the efficient administration of justice. While a close call, this Court will not restrict 

future filings unless Plaintiff continues to abuse the process. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted in part, over

Plaintiff’s objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, 

“This case is DISMISSED without leave to amend as frivolous and/or for failure to 

state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

No restrictions are imposed on future filings unless Plaintiff continues to abuse the 

judicial process.” The Clerk shall also close the file. 

SO ORDERED on September 23, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00181-MW-GRJ Document 7 Filed 09/23/20 Page 2 of 2
#### Lillian Schoninger, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v Vector Yardarm Corporation et al., Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 6, 1978, dismissed (see *Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgment of the same court, dated October 2, 1979 affirmed. No opinion. One bill of costs is awarded to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Rabin, JJ., concur.