# C_2021304EN.01006301.xml

| 29.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/63

---

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

of 18 June 2021

delivering a Council opinion on the 2021 Stability Programme of Latvia

(2021/C 304/14)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies (1), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation of the European Commission,

Having regard to the resolutions of the European Parliament,

After consulting the Economic and Financial Committee,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 20 March 2020, the Commission adopted a communication on the activation of the general escape clause of the Stability and Growth Pact. The general escape clause, as set out in Articles 5(1), 6(3), 9(1) and 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 and Articles 3(5) and 5(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 (2), facilitates the coordination of budgetary policies in times of severe economic downturn. In that communication, the Commission set out its view that, given the expected severe economic downturn resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, the conditions for activating the general escape clause were met. On 23 March 2020, the ministers of finance of the Member States agreed with the assessment of the Commission. The general escape clause has granted Member States budgetary flexibility to deal with the COVID-19 crisis. It has facilitated the coordination of budgetary policies in times of severe economic downturn. Its activation allows for a temporary departure from the adjustment path towards the medium-term budgetary objective of each Member State, provided that this does not endanger fiscal sustainability in the medium term. On 17 September 2020, in its communication on the 2021 Annual Sustainable Growth Strategy, the Commission announced that the general escape clause would remain active in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 20 March 2020, the Commission adopted a communication on the activation of the general escape clause of the Stability and Growth Pact. The general escape clause, as set out in Articles 5(1), 6(3), 9(1) and 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 and Articles 3(5) and 5(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 (2), facilitates the coordination of budgetary policies in times of severe economic downturn. In that communication, the Commission set out its view that, given the expected severe economic downturn resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, the conditions for activating the general escape clause were met. On 23 March 2020, the ministers of finance of the Member States agreed with the assessment of the Commission. The general escape clause has granted Member States budgetary flexibility to deal with the COVID-19 crisis. It has facilitated the coordination of budgetary policies in times of severe economic downturn. Its activation allows for a temporary departure from the adjustment path towards the medium-term budgetary objective of each Member State, provided that this does not endanger fiscal sustainability in the medium term. On 17 September 2020, in its communication on the 2021 Annual Sustainable Growth Strategy, the Commission announced that the general escape clause would remain active in 2021.

| (2) | On 20 July 2020, the Council adopted a Recommendation (3) (‘the Council Recommendation of 20 July 2020’). It recommended Latvia to take all necessary measures, in line with the general escape clause, to effectively address the COVID-19 pandemic, sustain the economy and support the ensuing recovery. It also recommended Latvia to pursue, when economic conditions allow, fiscal policies aimed at achieving prudent medium-term fiscal positions and ensuring debt sustainability, while enhancing investment. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 20 July 2020, the Council adopted a Recommendation (3) (‘the Council Recommendation of 20 July 2020’). It recommended Latvia to take all necessary measures, in line with the general escape clause, to effectively address the COVID-19 pandemic, sustain the economy and support the ensuing recovery. It also recommended Latvia to pursue, when economic conditions allow, fiscal policies aimed at achieving prudent medium-term fiscal positions and ensuring debt sustainability, while enhancing investment.

| (3) | The 2021 Council Recommendation on the economic policy of the euro area indicates that fiscal policies should remain supportive in all euro-area Member States throughout 2021 and that policy measures should be tailored to country-specific circumstances and be timely, temporary and targeted. When the epidemiological and economic conditions allow, emergency measures should be phased out, while combatting the social and labour-market impact of the crisis. Member States should pursue fiscal policies that are aimed at achieving prudent medium-term fiscal positions and ensuring debt sustainability, while enhancing investment. Member States should pursue reforms that strengthen the coverage, adequacy, and sustainability of health and social protection systems for all. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The 2021 Council Recommendation on the economic policy of the euro area indicates that fiscal policies should remain supportive in all euro-area Member States throughout 2021 and that policy measures should be tailored to country-specific circumstances and be timely, temporary and targeted. When the epidemiological and economic conditions allow, emergency measures should be phased out, while combatting the social and labour-market impact of the crisis. Member States should pursue fiscal policies that are aimed at achieving prudent medium-term fiscal positions and ensuring debt sustainability, while enhancing investment. Member States should pursue reforms that strengthen the coverage, adequacy, and sustainability of health and social protection systems for all.

| (4) | On 18 November 2020, the Commission adopted its opinions on the 2021 draft budgetary plans of the euro-area Member States, which were based on a qualitative assessment of the fiscal measures. The Commission was of the opinion that the draft budgetary plan of Latvia was overall in line with the fiscal policy recommendations set out in the Council Recommendation of 20 July 2020, and that most of the measures included in the draft budgetary plan supported economic activity against the background of considerable uncertainty. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

On 18 November 2020, the Commission adopted its opinions on the 2021 draft budgetary plans of the euro-area Member States, which were based on a qualitative assessment of the fiscal measures. The Commission was of the opinion that the draft budgetary plan of Latvia was overall in line with the fiscal policy recommendations set out in the Council Recommendation of 20 July 2020, and that most of the measures included in the draft budgetary plan supported economic activity against the background of considerable uncertainty.

| (5) | Next Generation EU, including the Recovery and Resilience Facility, will ensure a sustainable, inclusive and fair recovery. Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4), which established the Recovery and Resilience Facility, entered into force on 19 February 2021. The Recovery and Resilience Facility will provide financial support for the implementation of reforms and investment, entailing a fiscal impulse financed by the Union. It will contribute to the economic recovery and to the implementation of sustainable and growth-enhancing reforms and investment, in particular to promote the green and digital transitions and will strengthen the resilience and potential growth of the Member States’ economies. It will also help public finances to return to more favourable positions in the near term and will contribute to strengthening sustainable public finances and to growth and job creation in the medium and long term. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Next Generation EU, including the Recovery and Resilience Facility, will ensure a sustainable, inclusive and fair recovery. Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4), which established the Recovery and Resilience Facility, entered into force on 19 February 2021. The Recovery and Resilience Facility will provide financial support for the implementation of reforms and investment, entailing a fiscal impulse financed by the Union. It will contribute to the economic recovery and to the implementation of sustainable and growth-enhancing reforms and investment, in particular to promote the green and digital transitions and will strengthen the resilience and potential growth of the Member States’ economies. It will also help public finances to return to more favourable positions in the near term and will contribute to strengthening sustainable public finances and to growth and job creation in the medium and long term.

| (6) | On 3 March 2021, the Commission adopted a communication providing further policy orientations to facilitate the coordination of fiscal policies and the preparation of Member States’ Stability and Convergence Programmes. The overall fiscal stance, taking into account national budgets and the Recovery and Resilience Facility, should remain supportive in 2021 and 2022. At the same time, given the expectation that economic activity will gradually normalise in the second half of 2021, Member States’ fiscal policies should become more differentiated in 2022. Member States’ fiscal policies should take into account the state of the recovery, fiscal sustainability and the need to reduce economic, social and territorial divergences. In view of the need to support a sustainable recovery for the Union, Member States with low sustainability risks should gear their budgets towards maintaining a supportive fiscal policy in 2022, taking into account the impact of the Recovery and Resilience Facility. Member States with high debt levels should pursue prudent fiscal policies, while preserving nationally financed investment and making use of grants under the Recovery and Resilience Facility to fund additional high-quality investment projects and structural reforms. For the period beyond 2022, fiscal policies should continue to take into account the strength of the recovery, the degree of economic uncertainty and fiscal sustainability considerations. A refocusing of fiscal policies towards achieving prudent medium-term fiscal positions, including by phasing out support measures in due course, will contribute to ensuring fiscal sustainability in the medium term. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

On 3 March 2021, the Commission adopted a communication providing further policy orientations to facilitate the coordination of fiscal policies and the preparation of Member States’ Stability and Convergence Programmes. The overall fiscal stance, taking into account national budgets and the Recovery and Resilience Facility, should remain supportive in 2021 and 2022. At the same time, given the expectation that economic activity will gradually normalise in the second half of 2021, Member States’ fiscal policies should become more differentiated in 2022. Member States’ fiscal policies should take into account the state of the recovery, fiscal sustainability and the need to reduce economic, social and territorial divergences. In view of the need to support a sustainable recovery for the Union, Member States with low sustainability risks should gear their budgets towards maintaining a supportive fiscal policy in 2022, taking into account the impact of the Recovery and Resilience Facility. Member States with high debt levels should pursue prudent fiscal policies, while preserving nationally financed investment and making use of grants under the Recovery and Resilience Facility to fund additional high-quality investment projects and structural reforms. For the period beyond 2022, fiscal policies should continue to take into account the strength of the recovery, the degree of economic uncertainty and fiscal sustainability considerations. A refocusing of fiscal policies towards achieving prudent medium-term fiscal positions, including by phasing out support measures in due course, will contribute to ensuring fiscal sustainability in the medium term.

| (7) | In its communication of 3 March 2021, the Commission also took the view that the decision on the deactivation or continued application of the general escape clause should be taken as an overall assessment of the state of the economy, with the level of economic activity in the Union or euro area compared to pre-crisis levels (end of 2019) as a key quantitative criterion. On the basis of the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast, on 2 June 2021 the Commission considered that the conditions for continuing to apply the general escape clause in 2022 and for deactivating it as of 2023 were met. Country-specific situations will continue to be taken into account after the deactivation of the general escape clause. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

In its communication of 3 March 2021, the Commission also took the view that the decision on the deactivation or continued application of the general escape clause should be taken as an overall assessment of the state of the economy, with the level of economic activity in the Union or euro area compared to pre-crisis levels (end of 2019) as a key quantitative criterion. On the basis of the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast, on 2 June 2021 the Commission considered that the conditions for continuing to apply the general escape clause in 2022 and for deactivating it as of 2023 were met. Country-specific situations will continue to be taken into account after the deactivation of the general escape clause.

| (8) | On 15 April 2021, Latvia submitted its 2021 Stability Programme, in line with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1466/97. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

On 15 April 2021, Latvia submitted its 2021 Stability Programme, in line with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1466/97.

| (9) | In 2020, based on data validated by Eurostat, Latvia’s general government deficit was 4,5 % of gross domestic product (GDP), while general government debt increased to 43,5 % of GDP. The annual change in the primary budget balance amounted to - 4 % of GDP, including discretionary budgetary measures of 3,5 % of GDP in support of the economy and the operation of automatic stabilisers. Latvia also provided liquidity support to companies and households (such as guarantees and tax deferrals, which do not have a direct and immediate budgetary impact) estimated at 1,7 % of GDP; the actual take-up of the public guarantees in 2020 is estimated by the Commission at below 1⁄2 % of GDP. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

In 2020, based on data validated by Eurostat, Latvia’s general government deficit was 4,5 % of gross domestic product (GDP), while general government debt increased to 43,5 % of GDP. The annual change in the primary budget balance amounted to - 4 % of GDP, including discretionary budgetary measures of 3,5 % of GDP in support of the economy and the operation of automatic stabilisers. Latvia also provided liquidity support to companies and households (such as guarantees and tax deferrals, which do not have a direct and immediate budgetary impact) estimated at 1,7 % of GDP; the actual take-up of the public guarantees in 2020 is estimated by the Commission at below 1⁄2 % of GDP.

| (10) | On 2 June 2021, the Commission issued a report under Article 126(3) of the Treaty. That report discusses the budgetary situation of Latvia, as its general government deficit in 2020 exceeded the 3 %-of-GDP Treaty reference value. The report concluded that the deficit criterion was not fulfilled. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

On 2 June 2021, the Commission issued a report under Article 126(3) of the Treaty. That report discusses the budgetary situation of Latvia, as its general government deficit in 2020 exceeded the 3 %-of-GDP Treaty reference value. The report concluded that the deficit criterion was not fulfilled.

| (11) | The macroeconomic scenario underpinning the budgetary projections is cautious in 2021 and 2022. Real GDP growth rates are projected to be lower in the 2021 Stability Programme than in the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast, mostly due to lower export growth. Moreover, the 2021 Stability Programme projects a further decline in employment in 2021 and a slower recovery in 2022 than the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

The macroeconomic scenario underpinning the budgetary projections is cautious in 2021 and 2022. Real GDP growth rates are projected to be lower in the 2021 Stability Programme than in the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast, mostly due to lower export growth. Moreover, the 2021 Stability Programme projects a further decline in employment in 2021 and a slower recovery in 2022 than the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast.

| (12) | In its 2021 Stability Programme, the government plans an increase of the general government deficit from 5,4 % of GDP in 2020 to 9,3 % of GDP in 2021, while the debt ratio is planned to increase to 48,9 % of GDP in 2021. According to the 2021 Stability Programme, the change in the primary budget balance in 2021 compared with the pre-crisis level (2019) is set to amount to -8,7 % of GDP, reflecting the discretionary budgetary measures of 2,9 % of GDP in support of the economy and the operation of automatic stabilisers. The deficit and debt projections are above the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast. The 2021 Stability Programme projects a higher increase in expenditure, in particular in other expenditure, than the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast. Moreover, revenue developments are projected to be more favourable in the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast, in line with the more upbeat macroeconomic scenario in that forecast. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

In its 2021 Stability Programme, the government plans an increase of the general government deficit from 5,4 % of GDP in 2020 to 9,3 % of GDP in 2021, while the debt ratio is planned to increase to 48,9 % of GDP in 2021. According to the 2021 Stability Programme, the change in the primary budget balance in 2021 compared with the pre-crisis level (2019) is set to amount to -8,7 % of GDP, reflecting the discretionary budgetary measures of 2,9 % of GDP in support of the economy and the operation of automatic stabilisers. The deficit and debt projections are above the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast. The 2021 Stability Programme projects a higher increase in expenditure, in particular in other expenditure, than the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast. Moreover, revenue developments are projected to be more favourable in the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast, in line with the more upbeat macroeconomic scenario in that forecast.

| (13) | In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic downturn, Latvia has adopted budgetary measures to strengthen the capacity of its health system, contain the COVID-19 pandemic and provide relief to those individuals and sectors that have been particularly affected. This forceful policy response has cushioned the contraction in GDP, which, in turn, has curtailed the increase in government deficit and public debt. Fiscal measures should maximise support to the recovery without pre-empting future fiscal trajectories. Therefore, measures should avoid creating a permanent burden on public finances. When Member States introduce permanent measures, they should properly fund them to ensure budgetary neutrality in the medium term. The measures taken by Latvia in 2020 and 2021 have been in line with the Council Recommendation of 20 July 2020. Some of the discretionary measures adopted by the government over the period 2020 and 2021 do not appear to be temporary or matched by offsetting measures. Beyond the horizon of the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast, in 2023, the cumulative remaining impact of those non-temporary measures is preliminarily estimated at around 1 % of GDP, mainly consisting of public-sector wage increases, in particular for healthcare workers. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic downturn, Latvia has adopted budgetary measures to strengthen the capacity of its health system, contain the COVID-19 pandemic and provide relief to those individuals and sectors that have been particularly affected. This forceful policy response has cushioned the contraction in GDP, which, in turn, has curtailed the increase in government deficit and public debt. Fiscal measures should maximise support to the recovery without pre-empting future fiscal trajectories. Therefore, measures should avoid creating a permanent burden on public finances. When Member States introduce permanent measures, they should properly fund them to ensure budgetary neutrality in the medium term. The measures taken by Latvia in 2020 and 2021 have been in line with the Council Recommendation of 20 July 2020. Some of the discretionary measures adopted by the government over the period 2020 and 2021 do not appear to be temporary or matched by offsetting measures. Beyond the horizon of the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast, in 2023, the cumulative remaining impact of those non-temporary measures is preliminarily estimated at around 1 % of GDP, mainly consisting of public-sector wage increases, in particular for healthcare workers.

| (14) | The 2021 Stability Programme assumes investment and reforms financed by grants under the Recovery and Resilience Facility amounting to 0,1 % in 2021, 0,8 % in 2022 and 0,8 % in 2023. The 2021 Stability Programme assumes expenditure financed by the Recovery and Resilience Facility to be slightly back-loaded, with higher spending planned in 2024 and 2025. The Commission’s 2021 spring forecast includes those grants in its budgetary projections. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

The 2021 Stability Programme assumes investment and reforms financed by grants under the Recovery and Resilience Facility amounting to 0,1 % in 2021, 0,8 % in 2022 and 0,8 % in 2023. The 2021 Stability Programme assumes expenditure financed by the Recovery and Resilience Facility to be slightly back-loaded, with higher spending planned in 2024 and 2025. The Commission’s 2021 spring forecast includes those grants in its budgetary projections.

| (15) | The established indicators of fiscal adjustment set out in Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 need to be considered in the context of the current circumstances. First, there is significant uncertainty surrounding output gap estimates. Second, there is a need for fiscal policy to stand ready to rapidly adapt to the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic, shifting from emergency relief to more targeted measures once health risks diminish. Third, the current context is characterised by a significant policy response to support economic activity. In the presence of sizeable transfers from the Union budget (such as those from the Recovery and Resilience Facility), the established indicators do not capture the full impulse provided to the economy by fiscal policies. Against this background, the structural balance does not appear adequate in the current circumstances. The expenditure benchmark also needs to be adapted (5) and complemented with additional information in order to fully gauge the fiscal policy orientation. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

The established indicators of fiscal adjustment set out in Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 need to be considered in the context of the current circumstances. First, there is significant uncertainty surrounding output gap estimates. Second, there is a need for fiscal policy to stand ready to rapidly adapt to the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic, shifting from emergency relief to more targeted measures once health risks diminish. Third, the current context is characterised by a significant policy response to support economic activity. In the presence of sizeable transfers from the Union budget (such as those from the Recovery and Resilience Facility), the established indicators do not capture the full impulse provided to the economy by fiscal policies. Against this background, the structural balance does not appear adequate in the current circumstances. The expenditure benchmark also needs to be adapted (5) and complemented with additional information in order to fully gauge the fiscal policy orientation.

| (16) | As in the approach pursued in the assessment of the 2021 draft budgetary plans, temporary emergency measures have been excluded from the expenditure aggregate. These crisis-related temporary emergency measures support health systems and compensate workers and firms for the losses in income due to lockdowns and supply chain disruptions; their reversal by the public authorities is contingent on the return of the public health and economic situation to normality. To assess the overall fiscal stance at the current juncture, the sizeable transfers from the Union budget (such as those from the Recovery and Resilience Facility) should be included in the relevant expenditure aggregate. The overall fiscal stance is therefore measured by the change in primary expenditure (net of discretionary revenue measures and excluding crisis-related temporary emergency measures) including expenditure financed by grants under the Recovery and Resilience Facility and other Union funds. Going beyond the overall fiscal stance, the analysis also aims to assess whether national fiscal policy is prudent and its composition is conducive to a sustainable recovery consistent with the green and digital transitions. For that reason, particular attention is paid to the evolution of nationally financed primary current expenditure and investment. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

As in the approach pursued in the assessment of the 2021 draft budgetary plans, temporary emergency measures have been excluded from the expenditure aggregate. These crisis-related temporary emergency measures support health systems and compensate workers and firms for the losses in income due to lockdowns and supply chain disruptions; their reversal by the public authorities is contingent on the return of the public health and economic situation to normality. To assess the overall fiscal stance at the current juncture, the sizeable transfers from the Union budget (such as those from the Recovery and Resilience Facility) should be included in the relevant expenditure aggregate. The overall fiscal stance is therefore measured by the change in primary expenditure (net of discretionary revenue measures and excluding crisis-related temporary emergency measures) including expenditure financed by grants under the Recovery and Resilience Facility and other Union funds. Going beyond the overall fiscal stance, the analysis also aims to assess whether national fiscal policy is prudent and its composition is conducive to a sustainable recovery consistent with the green and digital transitions. For that reason, particular attention is paid to the evolution of nationally financed primary current expenditure and investment.

| (17) | In its 2021 Stability Programme, Latvia’s general government deficit is planned to decrease to 2,7 % of GDP in 2022, mainly due to a discontinuation of the temporary support measures adopted in 2020 and 2021. The general government debt ratio is planned to increase to 50,3 % of GDP in 2022. These projections are above the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast, mainly due to the more favourable macroeconomic scenario in that forecast. Based on the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast and on the basis of the specific methodology that reflects the above mentioned challenges, the overall fiscal stance — including the impact on aggregate demand in 2022 from investment financed by both the national and Union budgets, in particular the Recovery and Resilience Facility — is estimated at -0,8 % of GDP (6). The positive contribution of expenditure financed by Recovery and Resilience Facility grants and other Union funds is projected to increase by 0,6 percentage point of GDP. Nationally financed investment is projected to provide a contractionary contribution of 0,3 percentage point of GDP (7). Nationally financed primary current expenditure (net of discretionary revenue measures) is projected to provide an expansionary contribution of 0,5 percentage point of GDP. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

In its 2021 Stability Programme, Latvia’s general government deficit is planned to decrease to 2,7 % of GDP in 2022, mainly due to a discontinuation of the temporary support measures adopted in 2020 and 2021. The general government debt ratio is planned to increase to 50,3 % of GDP in 2022. These projections are above the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast, mainly due to the more favourable macroeconomic scenario in that forecast. Based on the Commission’s 2021 spring forecast and on the basis of the specific methodology that reflects the above mentioned challenges, the overall fiscal stance — including the impact on aggregate demand in 2022 from investment financed by both the national and Union budgets, in particular the Recovery and Resilience Facility — is estimated at -0,8 % of GDP (6). The positive contribution of expenditure financed by Recovery and Resilience Facility grants and other Union funds is projected to increase by 0,6 percentage point of GDP. Nationally financed investment is projected to provide a contractionary contribution of 0,3 percentage point of GDP (7). Nationally financed primary current expenditure (net of discretionary revenue measures) is projected to provide an expansionary contribution of 0,5 percentage point of GDP.

| (18) | The quality of Member States’ budgetary measures appears particularly important. Fiscal structural reforms aimed at improving the composition of national budgets can support potential growth, create much-needed fiscal space and help to ensure fiscal sustainability over the longer term, including in view of climate change and health challenges. On the revenue side, the COVID-19 crisis has reinforced the importance of reforms for more efficient and fairer public revenue systems. On the expenditure side, it has made it even more crucial to increase the level and quality of sustainable and growth-enhancing investments, in a manner consistent with serving the objectives of enhancing growth potential, economic and social resilience, and the green and digital twin transition. The national recovery and resilience plans will allow to improve the composition of national budgets. |
| --- | --- |

(18)

The quality of Member States’ budgetary measures appears particularly important. Fiscal structural reforms aimed at improving the composition of national budgets can support potential growth, create much-needed fiscal space and help to ensure fiscal sustainability over the longer term, including in view of climate change and health challenges. On the revenue side, the COVID-19 crisis has reinforced the importance of reforms for more efficient and fairer public revenue systems. On the expenditure side, it has made it even more crucial to increase the level and quality of sustainable and growth-enhancing investments, in a manner consistent with serving the objectives of enhancing growth potential, economic and social resilience, and the green and digital twin transition. The national recovery and resilience plans will allow to improve the composition of national budgets.

| (19) | According to the 2021 Stability Programme’s medium-term budgetary plans, the general government deficit is planned to decrease from 1,3 % in 2023, to 0,3 % of GDP in 2024. Based on the 2021 Stability Programme, the overall fiscal stance –including the impact on aggregate demand from investment financed by both the national and Union budgets, in particular the Recovery and Resilience Facility –is estimated at +1,4 % of GDP in 2023 and 2024 on average. The positive contribution of expenditure financed by Recovery and Resilience Facility grants and other Union funds is projected to decrease by 0,3 percentage point of GDP in 2023 and 2024 on average. Nationally financed investment is projected to provide a contractionary contribution of 0,1 percentage point of GDP (8). Nationally financed primary current expenditure (net of discretionary revenue measures) is projected to provide a contractionary contribution of 1 percentage point of GDP. The current estimate of the 10-year average nominal potential growth is 43⁄4 % (9). However, this estimate does not include the impact of the reforms that are part of the recovery and resilience plan and could therefore boost Latvia’s potential growth. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

According to the 2021 Stability Programme’s medium-term budgetary plans, the general government deficit is planned to decrease from 1,3 % in 2023, to 0,3 % of GDP in 2024. Based on the 2021 Stability Programme, the overall fiscal stance –including the impact on aggregate demand from investment financed by both the national and Union budgets, in particular the Recovery and Resilience Facility –is estimated at +1,4 % of GDP in 2023 and 2024 on average. The positive contribution of expenditure financed by Recovery and Resilience Facility grants and other Union funds is projected to decrease by 0,3 percentage point of GDP in 2023 and 2024 on average. Nationally financed investment is projected to provide a contractionary contribution of 0,1 percentage point of GDP (8). Nationally financed primary current expenditure (net of discretionary revenue measures) is projected to provide a contractionary contribution of 1 percentage point of GDP. The current estimate of the 10-year average nominal potential growth is 43⁄4 % (9). However, this estimate does not include the impact of the reforms that are part of the recovery and resilience plan and could therefore boost Latvia’s potential growth.

| (20) | The general government debt ratio is planned to decrease from 48,8 % of GDP in 2023 to 48,5 % of GDP in 2024. Latvia is considered to face low fiscal sustainability risks over the medium term, as per the latest debt sustainability analysis. |
| --- | --- |

(20)

The general government debt ratio is planned to decrease from 48,8 % of GDP in 2023 to 48,5 % of GDP in 2024. Latvia is considered to face low fiscal sustainability risks over the medium term, as per the latest debt sustainability analysis.

| (21) | In view of the currently still exceptionally high degree of uncertainty, the fiscal policy guidance should remain predominantly qualitative. More precise quantified guidance for the later years should be provided in 2022, if the degree of uncertainty has sufficiently declined by then. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

In view of the currently still exceptionally high degree of uncertainty, the fiscal policy guidance should remain predominantly qualitative. More precise quantified guidance for the later years should be provided in 2022, if the degree of uncertainty has sufficiently declined by then.

| (22) | The Council has assessed the 2021 Stability Programme and the follow-up by Latvia to the Council Recommendation of 20 July 2020, |
| --- | --- |

(22)

The Council has assessed the 2021 Stability Programme and the follow-up by Latvia to the Council Recommendation of 20 July 2020,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS LATVIA TO:

1.

In 2022, maintain a supportive fiscal stance, including the impulse provided by the Recovery and Resilience Facility, and preserve nationally financed investment. Keep the growth of nationally financed current expenditure under control.

2.

When economic conditions allow, pursue a fiscal policy aimed at achieving prudent medium-term fiscal positions and ensuring fiscal sustainability in the medium term. At the same time, enhance investment to boost growth potential.

3.

Pay particular attention to the composition of public finances, on both the revenue and expenditure sides of the budget, and to the quality of budgetary measures, in order to ensure a sustainable and inclusive recovery. Prioritise sustainable and growth-enhancing investment, in particular investment supporting the green and digital transition. Give priority to fiscal structural reforms that will help provide financing for public policy priorities and contribute to the long-term sustainability of public finances, including, where relevant, by strengthening the coverage, adequacy, and sustainability of health and social protection systems for all.

Done at Luxembourg, 18 June 2021.

For the Council

The President

J. LEÃO

---

(1)  OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure (OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 6).

2

(3)  Council Recommendation of 20 July 2020 on the 2020 National Reform Programme of Latvia and delivering a Council opinion on the 2020 Stability Programme of Latvia (OJ C 282, 26.8.2020, p. 89).

3

(4)  Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 February 2021 establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility (OJ L 57, 18.2.2021, p. 17).

4

(5)  In particular, the four-year smoothing of investment used in the expenditure benchmark does not allow for a proper assessment of the fiscal support for the recovery provided by nationally financed investments.

5

(6)  A negative sign of the indicator corresponds to an excess of the primary expenditure growth compared with medium-term economic growth, which indicates an expansionary fiscal policy.

6

(7)  Other nationally financed capital expenditure is projected to provide a neutral contribution.

7

(8)  Other nationally financed capital expenditure is projected to provide a neutral contribution.

8

(9)  Estimated by the Commission in accordance with the commonly agreed methodology.

9

---