alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
TransMontaigne's financial statements for the nine months ended January 31, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997  
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996  
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997  
<CASH>                                      28,168,373  
<SECURITIES>                                         0  
<RECEIVABLES>                               41,758,953  
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0  
<INVENTORY>                                 49,296,802  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           120,534,394  
<PP&E>                                     113,694,325  
<DEPRECIATION>                             (8,151,832)  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             248,201,779  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,451,675  
<BONDS>                                    124,906,667  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                       210,742  
<OTHER-SE>                                  73,072,869  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               248,201,779  
<SALES>                                              0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           811,476,612  
<CGS>                                                0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              797,453,937  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,808,287  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,355,540  
<INCOME-TAX>                                   450,000  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,905,540  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,905,540  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28  
        

</TABLE>
In the 

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas 

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00159-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.W., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 360th District 

Court

of Tarrant County (360-670381-19) 

November 19, 2020

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that as to 

Mother’s appeal there was no error in the trial court’s judgment but that Father’s appeal 

should be dismissed. It is ordered that the trial court’s judgment terminating Mother’s 

parental rights is affirmed but that Father’s appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

It is further ordered that Mother shall pay all of the costs of this appeal for which 

let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KORNEAL TOLLIVER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:20cv384-MW/HTC

FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER

TALLAHASSEE, D ARNOLD, and

C BARNES,

Defendants. 

__________________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation, ECF No. 7. Upon consideration, with no objections having 

been filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “This action is DISMISSED

without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute.”

The Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on January 4, 2021.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00384-MW-HTC Document 9 Filed 01/04/21 Page 1 of 1
4.2003 Notification.       When a contractor provides notification pursuant to 52.204-23, follow agency procedures.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 4.20 Prohibition on Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Services Developed or Provided by Kaspersky Lab
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JEFFERY TODD CRYSTAL,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5565-LC/MAF

MARK INCH,

Respondent.

 /

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation

of the U.S. Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 12) that the petition for writ of

habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, be denied. The parties

have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have

been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and 

Recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is adopted and

Case 3:20-cv-05565-LC-MAF Document 15 Filed 12/07/21 Page 1 of 2
incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The petition for writ of

habeas corpus filed by Jeffery Todd Crystal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is

DENIED. Any certificate of appealability is DENIED and leave to appeal in

forma pauperis is also DENIED.” 

3. The Clerk shall close the file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 7

th

day of December, 2021.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05565-LC-MAF Document 15 Filed 12/07/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 3560.250 OMB control number.

The information collection requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and have been assigned OMB control number 0575-0189. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to vary from 15 minutes to 18 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. A person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
1 EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

Submittal Date May 13, 2014

District Name Ventura County APCD

Date Reviewed July 8, 2014

EPA Reviewer Arnold Lazarus Key:

C = Complete

I = Incomplete

N/A = Not Applicable To Rule

O = Material Missing

N/S = None Submitted

RULE #: 23 74.31

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee C C

(b) Evidence of adoption C C

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt C C

(d1) Copy of actual rule/plan C C

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross

- out C N/A

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements C C

(f) Copy of public notice C C

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice C C

(h) Public comments & agency response C C

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified C C

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified C C

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact N/A C

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions N/A C

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements C C

(h) Compliance/enforcement strategies C C

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C



### Notes::2
#### In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes Cases.

[Cite as *In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes Cases,*109 Ohio St.3d 509, 2006-Ohio-2721.]

*510(Submitted May 24, 2006

Decided June 7, 2006.)

{¶ 1} The following dispositions of currently pending appeals are hereby entered based on our decision in *State v. Foster,*109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470.

Moyek, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

{¶ 2} Discretionary appeals are accepted in the following cases, the judgments of the courts of appeals are reversed, and the causes are remanded to the trial courts for resentencing. If propositions of law are noted, such reversals apply only to those portions of the judgments of the courts of appeals as are implicated by the applicable propositions of law:

{¶ 3} 2006-0277. *State v. Jones,*Allen App. No. 1-04-53, 2005-Ohio-6859, 2005 WL 3526781. Accepted on Proposition of Law No. V.

{¶ 4} 2006-0313. *State v. Hines,*Allen App. No. 1-04-47, 2005-Ohio-6870, 2005 WL 3527004.

{¶ 5} 2006-0318. *State v. Wassil,*Portage App. No. 2004-P-0102, 2005-Ohio-7053, 2005 WL 3610436. Accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

{¶ 6} 2006-0327. *State v. Mitchell,*Summit App. No. 22830, 2005-Ohio-6915, 2005 WL 3537651.

{¶ 7} 2006-0337. *State v. Harris,*Hamilton App. No. C-040483, 2005-Ohio-6995, 2005 WL 3557397. Accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

{¶ 8} 2006-0387. *State v. Axson,*Cuyahoga App. No. 86029, 2005-Ohio-6342, 2005 WL 3219727. Accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

{¶ 9} 2006-0466. *State v. Moser,*Richland App. No. 05CA39, 2006-Ohio-165, 2006 WL 136158. Accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 10} 2006-0475. *State v. Bryant,*Summit App. No. 22723, 2006-Ohio-517, 2006 WL 287958. Accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.
**GUARANTY**

 

THIS GUARANTY is entered into as of April 23, 2007, by W. ROBERT KOHORST (“Guarantor”), in favor of EAST WEST BANK, a California banking corporation (“Lender”).

 

**RECITALS**

 

A.    Lender is the payee under the Promissory Note of this date in the principal amount of $9,000,000 (the “Note”) made by Everest Properties II**,**LLC (“Borrower”). The Note evidences a loan from Lender to Borrower in the maximum principal amount of the Note (the “Loan”). Borrower’s performance under the Note is secured by the Security Agreement of this date executed by Borrower for the benefit of Lender (the “Security Agreement”). The Note, Security Agreement and all other documents, agreements and instruments evidencing, securing or otherwise delivered in connection with the Loan are referred to as the “Loan Documents.”

 

B.        Guarantor’s execution and delivery of this Guaranty is a condition precedent to Lender’s making the Loan. Guarantor has in interest in Borrower and will directly benefit from Lender’s making the Loan to Borrower. Guarantor is therefore willing to enter into this Guaranty to induce Lender to make the Loan to Borrower.

 

**AGREEMENT**

 

|   | 1. | Guaranty. |
|--------|----|-----------|

 

(a)       Guarantor unconditionally and irrevocably guarantees the full and prompt payment of all principal, interest, fees, costs and other sums owed under the Loan Documents at the times and according to the terms expressed in the Loan Documents, including any interest, late charges, default interest, fees and costs (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) that would have accrued under the Loan Documents but for the commencement of a case under Title 11 of the United States Code or any successor statute (the “Bankruptcy Code”).

 

(b)       Guarantor’s liability under this Guaranty is a guaranty of payment and performance of the Note and not of collectibility only.

 

2.**       Chances Do Not Affect Liability. Guarantor agrees that Lender may without notice to Guarantor and without limiting Guarantor’s liability under, or affecting the enforceability of, this Guaranty:

 

(a)       grant extensions of time, renewals or other indulgences and modifications to Borrower or any other party under the Loan Documents;

 

|   | (b) | change the rate of interest under the Note; |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------|

 

 

----
# L_2013293EN.01003401.xml

| 5.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 293/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 293/34

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1090/2013

of 4 November 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Travia da Beira Baixa (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Portugal’s application to register the name ‘Travia da Beira Baixa’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Portugal’s application to register the name ‘Travia da Beira Baixa’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Travia da Beira Baixa’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Travia da Beira Baixa’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 November 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 353, 17.11.2012, p. 14.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.4.   Other products of animal origin (milk products)

PORTUGAL

Travia da Beira Baixa (PDO)

---
# CI2021234EN.01000301.xml

| 17.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 234/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 234/3

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 June 2021

appointing one member and one alternate member of the Management Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) for Latvia

(2021/C 234 I/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2019/126 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 January 2019 establishing the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA), and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 2062/94 (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to the list of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States and by the employees’ and the employers’ organisations,

Having regard to the lists of members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decisions of 9 April 2019 (2), 6 June 2019 (3) (4), and 8 July 2019 (5), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Management Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2023. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decisions of 9 April 2019 (2), 6 June 2019 (3) (4), and 8 July 2019 (5), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Management Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2023.

| (2) | The employers’ organisation BusinessEurope has submitted two nominations for two posts to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The employers’ organisation BusinessEurope has submitted two nominations for two posts to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are appointed as member and alternate member of the Management Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 31 March 2023:

| III. | REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS’ ORGANISATIONS







  Country | Members | Alternate members |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Latvia | Mr Jānis PUMPIŅŠ | Ms Inese STEPIŅA |

III.

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS’ ORGANISATIONS

Country

Members

Alternate members

Latvia

Mr Jānis PUMPIŅŠ

Ms Inese STEPIŅA

Article 2

The Council shall appoint the members and alternate members not yet nominated at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 16 June 2021.

For the Council

The President

A. MENDES GODINHO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 30, 31.1.2019, p. 58.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 135, 11.4.2019, p. 7.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 195, 11.6.2019, p. 4.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 156, 13.6.2019, p. 3.

4

(5)  
  OJ C 232,10.7.2019, p. 4.

5

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Paul Holmes, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 1, 1965, dismissed. An order denying a motion for resentence is not appealable *(People*v. *Brown,*26 A D 2d 779). However, we have examined the record and considered, defendant’s contention; and, if we did not dismiss the appeal, we would have affirmed the order *(People*v. *844
      *Gross,*5 N Y 2d 131; *People*v. *Sullivan,*3 N Y 2d 196). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Animal Health International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, James C. Robison, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and William
F. Lacey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ James C. RobisonName:

James C. RobisonTitle:

Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

September 3, 2009




/s/ William F. LaceyName:

William F. LaceyTitle:

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

September 3, 2009




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NTP Comments on 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene

During our review of the document on 1,2,4- and 1,3,5-TMB we along with other agencies 

recommended inclusion of information on 1,2,3-TMB. We are pleased that EPA accepted the 

recommendation and has prepared the supplemental information on 1,2,3-TMB. EPA has 

selected the appropriate critical studies, clearly described the critical endpoints of toxicity and 

derived the RfC based on the neurotoxicity, the most consistently observed endpoint in the 

toxicology database. The rationale for each uncertainty factor applied to derive the RfC is 

clearly and convincingly rationalized. Overall, we fully agree with the contents of the document 

and commend the authors for preparing an excellent document.

Submitted by:

Rajendra S. Chhabra, BVSc, PhD, DABT
Exhibit 21.1



Pioneer Railcorp Subsidiaries


Alabama Railroad Co. (ALAB)
Alabama & Florida Railway Co., Inc. (AF)
Decatur Junction Railway Co. (DT)
Elkhart & Western Railroad Co. (EWR)
Fort Smith Railroad Co. (FSR)
Gettysburg & Northern Railroad Co. (GET)
Indiana Southwestern Railway Co. (ISW)
Kendallville Terminal Railway Co. (KTR)
Keokuk Junction Railway Co. (KJRY)
Michigan Southern Railroad Company (MSO)
Mississippi Central Railroad Co. (MSCI)
Pioneer Air, Inc. (PAR)
Pioneer Industrial Railway Co. (PRY)
Pioneer Resources, Inc. (PRI)
Pioneer Railroad Services, Inc. (PRS)
Pioneer Railroad Equipment Co., Ltd. (PREL)
Shawnee Terminal Railway Company (STR)
The Garden City Western Railway, Inc. (GCW)
Vandalia Railroad Company (VRRC)
West Michigan Railroad Co. (WMI)


                                       1
#### § 4288.26 Fiscal Year 2009 and Fiscal Year 2010 applications.

Any entity that submitted an application for payment to the Agency under this program prior to March 14, 2011 will have their payments made and serviced in accordance with the provisions specified in this subpart.