alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit No. 3(i)

                            ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT OF
                            NATIONAL BANKSHARES, INC.


    The undersigned corporation, pursuant to Title 13.1, Chapter 9, Article 11
of the Code of Virginia, hereby executes the following articles of amendment and
sets forth:

                                       ONE
    The name of the corporation is National Bankshares, Inc.

                                       TWO
    The text of the amendment adopted is as follows:
    To increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, Paragraph
 2.(a). is amended in pertinent part as follows,
        2.(a.) The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation is
               authorized to issue is as follows: Class Number of Shares Par
               Value Common 10,000,000 $2.50

                                      THREE
    The amendment does not provide for an exchange, reclassification, or
cancellation of issued shares.

                                      FOUR
    The date that the amendment of Paragraph 2.(a.) of the articles of
incorporation  was adopted was April 8, 2003.

                                      FIVE
    The amendment was proposed by the board of directors and submitted to the
shareholders in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9 of Title 13.1 of the
Code of Virginia, and:

(a)      The designation, number of outstanding shares, and number of votes
         entitled to be cast by each voting group entitled to vote separately on
         the amendment was: Designation No. of Outstanding Shares No. of Votes
         Entitled to be Cast Common Stock 3,511,377 Shares 3,511,377 Shares

(b)      The total number of:

      (i) Votes cast for and against the amendment by each voting group entitled
          to vote separately on the amendment was:

                               Total No. of Votes        Total No. of Votes
                                 Cast FOR the             Cast AGAINST the
          Voting Group             Amendment                 Amendment
          ------------        --------------------     ---------------------

          Common Stock             3,051,535                  143,693

(c)      And the number cast for the amendment by the voting group was
         sufficient for approval by that voting group.

    The undersigned Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief
Executive Officer declares that the facts herein stated are true as of April 8,
2003.

                            NATIONAL BANKSHARES, INC.


                                            By: /s/ JAMES G. RAKES
                                                --------------------------------
                                                James G. Rakes
                                                Chairman
                                                President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer

                                       62
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR FISCAL QUARTER ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<CASH>                               35,692
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,544,298
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                         607,528
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,187,518
<PP&E>                            5,556,451
<DEPRECIATION>                    2,940,530
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   12,368,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             6,218,857
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                         140,113
<COMMON>                          1,327,304
<OTHER-SE>                        4,458,823
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     12,368,867
<SALES>                           2,353,424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  2,353,424
<CGS>                             1,796,132
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     1,796,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,431,004
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   76,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (1,869,542)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,869,542)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,860,207
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         (9,335)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.00)
        


</TABLE>
#### § 51.1522 U.S. Combination.

“U.S. Combination” consists of a combination of U.S. No. 1 and U.S. No. 2 plums or prunes: *Provided,* That at least 75 percent, by count, meet the requirements of U.S. No. 1 grade. (*See* § 51.1525.)
§ 3570.67 Project selection priorities. Applications are scored on a priority basis. Points will be distributed as follows: ( a ) *Population priorities.* The proposed project is located in a rural community having a population of: ( 1 ) 5,000 or less—30 points;
( 2 ) Between 5,001 and 12,000, inclusive—20 points;
( 3 ) Between 12,001 and 20,000, inclusive—10 points; or
( 4 ) Between 20,001 and 50,000, inclusive, when applicable—5 points.
( b ) *Income priorities.* The median household income of the population to be served by the proposed project is below the higher of the poverty line or: ( 1 ) 60 percent of the State nonmetropolitan median household income—30 points;
( 2 ) 70 percent of the State nonmetropolitan median household income—20 points;
( 3 ) 80 percent of the State nonmetropolitan median household income—10 points; or
( 4 ) 90 percent of the State nonmetropolitan median household income—5 points.
( c ) *Other priorities.* Points will be assigned for one or more of the following initiatives: ( 1 ) Project is consistent with, and is reflected in, the State Strategic Plan—10 points;
( 2 ) Project is for health care—10 points; or
( 3 ) Project is for public safety—10 points.
( d ) *Discretionary.* ( 1 ) The State Director may assign up to 15 points to a project in addition to those that may be scored under paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section. These points are to address unforeseen exigencies or emergencies, such as the loss of a community facility due to an accident or natural disaster or the loss of joint financing if Agency funds are not committed in a timely fashion. In addition, the points will be awarded to projects benefiting from the leveraging of funds in order to improve compatibility and coordination between the Agency and other agencies' selection systems and for those projects that are the most cost effective.
( 2 ) In selecting projects for funding at the National Office level, additional points will be awarded based on the priority assigned to the project by the State Office. These points will be awarded in the manner shown below. Only the three highest priority projects for a State will be awarded points. The Administrator may assign up to 30 additional points to account for geographic distribution of funds, emergency conditions caused by economic problems, natural disasters, or leveraging of funds.
Priority
Points 1
5 2
3 3
1
<page>

Exhibit 99.1
NORDSTROM CREDIT, INC.
13531 EAST CALEY
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO  80111
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
I, Kevin T. Knight, the President of Nordstrom Credit, Inc. (the
"Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended July 31, 2002 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission:

-  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      -  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
   all material respects, the financial condition and results of
   operations of the Company.


                                          /s/ Kevin T. Knight
                                          ------------------
                                          Kevin T. Knight
                                          President
                                          September 12, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73075-73076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL10-77-000]


Notice of Motion To Add Exhibit to Petition for Declaratory Order 
and Complaint

November 18, 2010.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Pella, Iowa                       Docket No. EL10-77-000.
v.
Midwest Independent Transmission System
 Operator, Inc.,
MidAmerican Energy Company, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that on November 15, 2010, the City of Pella, Iowa 
(Complainant) filed a motion to add a document as Exhibit P-28 to its 
July 2, 2010 petition for declaratory order and formal complaint 
against Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc. and MidAmerican 
Energy Company, Inc. (Respondents).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's 
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before 
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and 
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the

[[Page 73076]]

``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file 
electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest 
or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#13555641505c7d7f7a7d76406663637c616753757661703d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="571112051418393b3e393204222727382523173132253479303821">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on December 15, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29848 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
32.007 Contract financing payments.

(a)

(1) Unless otherwise prescribed in agency policies and procedures or otherwise specified in

paragraph (b) of this section, the due date for making contract financing payments by the designated

payment office is the 30 thday after the designated billing office receives a proper contract financing

request.

(2) If an audit or other review of a specific financing request is required to ensure compliance with

the terms and conditions of the contract, the designated payment office is not compelled to make

payment by the specified due date.

(3) Agency heads may prescribe shorter periods for payment based on contract pricing or

administrative considerations. For example, a shorter period may be justified by an agency if the

nature and extent of contract financing arrangements are integrated with agency contract pricing

policies.

(4) Agency heads must not prescribe a period shorter than 7 days or longer than 30 days.

(b) For advance payments, loans, or other arrangements that do not involve recurrent submission of

contract financing requests, the designated payment office will make payment in accordance with

the applicable contract financing terms or as directed by the contracting officer.

(c) A proper contract financing request must comply with the terms and conditions specified by the

contract. The contractor must correct any defects in requests submitted in the manner specified in

the contract or as directed by the contracting officer.

(d) The designated billing office and designated payment office must annotate each contract

financing request with the date their respective offices received the request.

(e) The Government will not pay an interest penalty to the contractor as a result of delayed contract

financing payments.

Parent topic: Part 32 - Contract Financing
OAO 247 (02/08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

United States of America )

)

)

)

)

)

v.

ANTHONY DEXTER WILLIAMS Case No: 3:99cr50/RV

USM No: 24174-018

Date of Previous Judgment: December 15, 2000 Randolph Murrell, Federal Public Defender

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) Defendant’s Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of : the defendant 9 the Director of the Bureau of Prisons 9 the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

: DENIED. 9 GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in 

the last judgment issued) of months is reduced to .

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: 33 Amended Offense Level: 31

Criminal History Category: IV Criminal History Category: IV

Previous Guideline Range: 188 to 235 months Amended Guideline Range: 151 to 188 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

9 The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

: The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time

of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction.

9 Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Because the defendant was subject to a mandatory minimum of 240 months imprisonment, defendant Williams is

ineligible for a sentence reduction. See United States v. Williams, 549, F.3d 1337, 1342 (11th Cir. 2008).

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated December 15, 2000 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: June 19, 2009 /s/ Roger Vinson

Judge’s signature

Effective Date: Roger Vinson, Senior United States District Judge

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

Case 3:99-cr-00050-RV-WCS Document 203 Filed 06/19/09 Page 1 of 1
#### Sally S. Harvey, as Executrix of the Estate of Robert B. Harvey, Deceased, Respondent, v Alfred Harvey et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 1, 1980, directing defendants *628jointly and severally to post a $100,000 surety undertaking to insure obedience and compliance with all orders and judgments of the court, *pendente lite,*unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of allowing each defendant to post a separate surety bond in the amount of $100,000, and otherwise affirmed, with costs. Our modification is in response to expressed apprehensions as to the risk of forfeiture by either defendant based solely on the basis of his brother’s failure to comply. We have concluded that the amount fixed is appropriate, under the circumstances, for each defendant in his individual capacity. Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 1, 1980, adjudging defendant Leon Harvey guilty of contempt of court for violating and disobeying a prior order of the court, and fining him $250-plus costs and expenses in the amount of $2,610.85, is unanimously affirmed, with costs. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Fein, Lupiano and Carro, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DEVON A. PEMBERTON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20cv453-TKW-MAF

ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 6) and Plaintiff’s objection (Doc. 7). Based on the my de

novo review of the issues raised in the objection, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), I agree 

with the magistrate judge’s determination that Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed 

in forma pauperis (Doc. 5) should be denied. Plaintiff does not dispute the 

magistrate judge’s finding that he has sufficient funds in his inmate trust account to 

pay the filing fee and the Court finds that Plaintiff’s speculation that he might need 

the money for other purposes does not justify allowing him to proceed with this Fair 

Credit Reporting Act case without paying the filing fee. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

Case 4:20-cv-00453-TKW-MAF Document 8 Filed 11/02/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 5) is 

DENIED.

3. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this Order to pay the 

filing fee or this case will be dismissed.

4. This case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

DONE and ORDERED this 2nd day of November, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00453-TKW-MAF Document 8 Filed 11/02/20 Page 2 of 2
# L_2013332EN.01001401.xml

| 11.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 332/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 332/14

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1283/2013

of 10 December 2013

correcting the French language version of Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 laying down detailed rules concerning the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein (1), and in particular Article 19(2), (3) and (4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | There is an error in the French language version of Annex VII to Commission Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 of 4 May 2006 laying down detailed rules concerning the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein (2). The error, which does not affect the validity of permits and certificates or permit and certificate applications, concerns the code assigned to the description of the specimen ‘Caviar’. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

There is an error in the French language version of Annex VII to Commission Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 of 4 May 2006 laying down detailed rules concerning the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein (2). The error, which does not affect the validity of permits and certificates or permit and certificate applications, concerns the code assigned to the description of the specimen ‘Caviar’.

| (2) | Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 should therefore be corrected accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 should therefore be corrected accordingly.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Trade in Wild Fauna and Flora, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Trade in Wild Fauna and Flora,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Concerns only the French language version.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 December 2013.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 61, 3.3.1997, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 166, 19.6.2006, p. 1.

2

---
Case 5:03-cr-00045-MCR   Document 71   Filed 04/08/09   Page 1 of 1
# 22.403-1 Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute.

40 U.S.C. chapter 31, subchapter IV, Wage Rate Requirements (*Construction*), formerly known as the Davis-Bacon Act, provides that contracts in excess of $2,000 to which the *United States* or the District of Columbia is a party for *construction, alteration, or repair* (including painting and decorating) of public buildings or public works within the *United States*, *shall* contain a clause (see 52.222-6) that no laborer or mechanic employed directly upon the site of the work *shall* receive less than the prevailing wage rates as determined by the Secretary of Labor.

**Parent topic:**22.403 Statutory, Executive Order, and regulatory requirements.
#### § 3560.618 Supplemental requirements for on-farm labor housing.

The management plan for on-farm labor housing operated on a seasonal basis must have specific opening and closing dates. During the off-season, on-farm labor housing may be used under short-term lease provisions.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:95-cr-01017 MMP

GLENN LEVINSON,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 28, Motion to Amend Order of Judgment and

Commitment, filed by Defendant Glenn Levinson. In his motion, Mr. Levinson requests that the

judgment, Doc. 14, be amended to reflect that the offense to which he entered a plea of guilty

was a misdemeanor. Because Mr. Levinson is currently attempting to receive his insurance

license from the State of Florida, he states that an official court document is necessary to clarify

whether he was adjudged guilty of a felony or misdemeanor. The judgment as it stands reflects

the standard practice of the Court, and therefore Mr. Levinson’s motion to amend the judgment

is denied. However, since the information against Mr. Levinson was filed as a misdemeanor

rather than felony, when Mr. Levinson entered a plea of guilty, it was to a misdemeanor offense. 

It is the Court’s understanding that Mr. Levinson requires only an official court document

clarifying this issue. Accordingly, on June 19, 1995, Defendant Glenn Levinson entered a plea

of guilty to a misdemeanor offense, admitting a violation of 26 U.S.C. § 6050I(f)(1)(A). The

Clerk is directed to send Mr. Levinson a certified copy of this order. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of February, 2007

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:95-cr-01017-MP Document 29 Filed 02/13/07 Page 1 of 1