alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                                  EXHIBIT 27.1

                          FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                    COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
                        ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X

          This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Balance
Sheets of King World Productions, Inc. and its Subsidiaries and is quali-
fied in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

TABLE
<S>                                 <C>
MULTIPLIER                          1,000
CURRENCY                            U.S. DOLLARS
PERIOD-TYPE                         1st QUARTER
FISCAL-YEAR-END                     08/31/98
PERIOD-START                        03/01/98
PERIOD-END                          05/31/98
EXCHANGE-RATE                       1
CASH                                $224,752
SECURITIES                          $77,476
RECEIVABLES                         $78,479
ALLOWANCES                          $3,301
INVENTORY                           $0
CURRENT ASSETS                      $471,188
PP&E                                $29,349
DEPRECIATION                        $13,070
TOTAL-ASSETS                        $993,369
CURRENT-LIABILITIES                 $123,880
BONDS                               $0
COMMON                              $881
PREFERRED-MANDATORY                 $0
PREFERRED                           $0
OTHER-SE                            $1,236,534
TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY          $993,369
SALES                               $0
TOTAL-REVENUES                      $167,968
CGS                                 $0
TOTAL-COSTS                         $106,510
OTHER-EXPENSES                      $18,564
LOSS-PROVISION                      $0
INTEREST-EXPENSE                    $0
INCOME-PRETAX                       $50,514
INCOME-TAX                          $16,312
INCOME-CONTINUING                   $34,202
DISCONTINUED                        $0
EXTRAORDINARY                       $0
CHANGES                             $0
NET-INCOME                          $34,202
EPS-PRIMARY                         $0.47
EPS-DILUTED                         $0.45
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 227 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 227

                   For the relief of Ernesto Guillen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2005

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Ernesto Guillen.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Ernesto 
Guillen shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to 
the United States for permanent residence as of the date of enactment 
of this Act upon payment of any necessary visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Ernesto Guillen under 
section 1, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to 
reduce by one the total number of immigrant visas available during the 
current fiscal year to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1152(e)).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 502.9 Soliciting, vending, debt collection, and distribution of handbills.

The soliciting of alms and contributions, commercial soliciting and vending of all kinds or the display or distribution of commercial advertising, or the collecting of private debts, in or on BARC property, is prohibited. This section does not apply to national or local drives for funds for welfare, health, and other purposes sponsored or approved by the Agricultural Research Service, concessions, or personal notices posted by employees on authorized bulletin boards. Distribution of material such as pamphlets, handbills, and flyers or the posting of materials on bulletin boards or elsewhere is prohibited without prior approval of the Director, Beltsville Area.

[61 FR 51211, Oct. 1, 1996]
32.501-2 Unusual progress payments.       (a) 						            The contracting officer may provide unusual progress payments only if-                                                         (1) 								                The contract necessitates predelivery expenditures that are large in relation to contract price and in relation to the contractor’s working capital and credit;                                                            (2) 								                The contractor fully documents an actual need to supplement any private financing available, including guaranteed loans; and                                                            (3) 								                The contractor’s request is approved by the head of the contracting activity or a designee. In addition, see 32.502-2.                                                                             (b) 						            The excess of the unusual progress payment rate approved over the customary progress payment rate should be the lowest amount possible under the circumstances.                                          (c) 						            Progress payments will not be considered unusual merely because they are on letter contracts or the definitive contracts that supersede letter contracts.    **Parent topic:** 32.501 General.
§ 400.54 Submission and accuracy of production reports. ( a ) The insured is solely responsible for the timely submission and certification of accurate, complete production reports to the agent. Production reports must be provided for all planted units.
( b ) Records may be requested by the FCIC, or an insurance company reinsured by the FCIC, or by anyone acting on behalf of the FCIC or the insurance company. The insured must provide such records upon request.
( c ) The agent will explain the APH Program to insureds and prospective insureds. When necessary, the agent will assist the insured in preparation of production reports. The agent will determine the adjusted or unadjusted transitional or determined yields in accordance with § 400.54(b). The agent will review the production reports and forward them to the verifier, along with any requested and required supporting records for determination of an approved APH yield.
( d ) The verifier will determine if the certified production reports are acceptable and calculate the approved APH yield.
# 28.311-1 Contract clause.

In accordance with agency *acquisition* regulations, the *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.228-7, *Insurance*-Liability to Third Persons, in *solicitations* and contracts, other than those for *construction* contracts and those for *architect-engineer services*, when a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated.

**Parent topic:**28.311 Solicitation provision and contract clause on liability insurance under cost-reimbursement contracts.
| List      of Subsidiaries(1)                         |
|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |   |
|                                                 | Jurisdiction |
| Katonah      Debt Advisors, L.L.C.(2)                | Delaware |
| Kohlberg      Capital Funding LLC I                  | Delaware |
| Katonah      Management Holdings LLC(2)              | Delaware |
| Katonah      X Management LLC(2)(3)                  | Delaware |
| Katonah      2007-I Management LLC(2)(3)             | Delaware |
| Katonah      2008-II Management LLC(2)(3)            | Delaware |
| Katonah      Scott’s Cove Management LLC(2)(3) | Delaware |
| KPKSI      Management Holdings LLC(2)                | Delaware |
| KPKSI      Holdings LLC(2)(4)                        | Delaware |

----

| (1) | Excludes      a 35% interest in PKSIL LLC. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------|

| (2) | Represents      a wholly-owned portfolio company that is not consolidated for financial      reporting purposes. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (3) | A      wholly-owned subsidiary of Katonah Management Holdings  LLC. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (4) | A      wholly-owned subsidiary of KPKSI Management Holdings  LLC. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
# L_2013214EN.01000101.xml

| 9.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 214/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 214/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 765/2013

of 29 July 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Walbecker Spargel (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Walbecker Spargel’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Walbecker Spargel’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Walbecker Spargel’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Walbecker Spargel’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 July 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 288, 25.9.2012, p. 13.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

GERMANY

Walbecker Spargel (PGI)

---
#### Rene Navarro MURILLO; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-71006.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 20, 2007 *.

Filed Aug. 24, 2007.

*456Rene Navarro Murillo, Santa Barbara, CA, pro se.

Patricia Hereida Navarro, Santa Barbara, CA, pro se.

Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of The District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Stuart S. Nickum, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, KLEINFELD and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioners’ motions to reconsider and reopen proceedings as untimely. Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

We conclude that this petition for review is appropriate for summary disposition because the regulations provide that “a motion to reconsider a decision must be filed with the Board within 30 days after the mailing of the Board decision.” *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2). The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider filed on October 23, 2006, more than 30 days after the BIA’s December 30, 2004.

Further, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen because petitioners’ motion violated the time limitation on motions to reopen. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). A motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days after the date on which a final administrative decision was filed. *Id.*The final order of removal was entered by the Board on December 30, 2004. Petitioners’ motion to reopen was not filed until October 23, 2006. Accordingly, this petition for review is denied in part. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Irving Levine et al., Appellants, v. Charles M. Robin et al., Respondents.

'Judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 22, 1965, reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed to be entered in favor of plaintiffs for the return of their down payment, $2,800, plus interest from August 8, 1963, and dismissal of the counterclaim, with costs. Findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed and new fundings are made as indicated herein. In our opinion, it was not necessary for plaintiffs, before canceling the contract, to await the decision of the Veterans’ Administration on the renewed application for a mortgage commitment, since it was apparent that the application would, in any event, be denied because of the unavailability of a proper certificate of occupancy. The law does not require a party to await the happening of a condition which, without the fault of such party, is incapable of fulfillment (cf. *Momberger*v. *Maleca Co.,*82 N. Y. S. 2d 190, affd. 274 App. Div. 932, affd. 299 N. Y. 555). Under the circumstances, plaintiffs’ cancellation was timely made and did, in fact, effect a cancellation of the contract. 'Consequently, plaintiffs were relieved from proceeding any further and were entitled to the return of their down payment. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur. [46 Mise 2d 324.]
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 66 Filed 07/06/00 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 66 Filed 07/06/00 Page 2 of 2
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*April 26, 2006*

[Cite as *04/26/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-1967.]

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

2006-0235.

#### Olynyk v. Andrish.

Cuyahoga App. No. 86009, 2005-Ohio-6632. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that no conflict exists. This cause is therefore dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Resnick, Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.
#### §§ 4280.436-4280.438 [Reserved]
(April 20,1967)

#### Elias Goodman, Respondent, v. Ralph J. Solow, Appellant. Ralph J. Solow, Appellant, v. Elias Goodman et al., Respondents.

Order entered October 25, 1966, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the facts, without costs or disbursements, the motion and cross motion denied without prejudice, and the matter remanded for service of pleadings. A jurisdictional objection raised by a defendant is preserved though coupled with a defense on the merits and is not lost because also joined with a counterclaim reflecting the same issues as the defense. *(Katz & Son Billiard Prods,*v. *Correale & Sons,*26 A D 2d 52.) A jurisdictional challenge may be lost, however, where counterclaims are joined with cross claims against nonresidents and jurisdiction over the latter is obtained in the same manner in which personal jurisdiction over the defendant was obtained and the nonresidents appear and raise no objection. In the face of this issue of jurisdiction and the circumstance that resolution of the action depends upon proof of facts outside the note in suit which are not satisfactorily defined in the papers on this motion pursuant to CPLR 3213, the plaintiff is directed to serve and file his complaint within 20 days from the date of entry of the order herein and the defendant may interpose his answer asserting lack of jurisdiction as a defense. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Tilzer and Rabin, JJ.
#### § 51.1352 Handpicked.

*Handpicked* means that the pears do not show evidence of having been on the ground.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                             639
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   681995
<ALLOWANCES>                                     22075
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                            5155
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  669993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         335000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      165811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    669993
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                100351
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 61847
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               31288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  38504
<INCOME-TAX>                                     13900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              24604
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   1452
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     23152
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 3560.69 Supplemental requirements for congregate housing and group homes. ( a ) *General.* Congregate housing and group homes must be planned and developed in accordance with 7 CFR part 1924, subparts A and C.
( b ) *Design criteria.* Congregate housing and group homes must be designed to accommodate all special services that will be provided.
( c ) *Services.* Congregate housing and group home loan applicants, as part of their loan request, must submit a plan to make affordable services available to residents to assist the residents in living independently. The plan must address the availability of this assistance from service providers throughout the term of the loan. ( 1 ) For congregate housing, the resident services plan must address how the following services will be provided or made available: ( i ) One cooked meal per day, seven days per week;
( ii ) Transportation to and from the property;
( iii ) Assistance in housekeeping;
( iv ) Personal services;
( v ) Recreational and social activities; and
( vi ) Access to medical services.
( 2 ) For group homes, the resident services plan must address how access to the following services will be provided or made available: ( i ) A common kitchen in which to prepare meals;
( ii ) Transportation;
( iii ) Nearby recreational and social activities which may be coordinated by the resident assistant, if applicable; and
( iv ) Medical services as necessary.
( d ) *Necessary items.* Borrowers must ensure items such as tables, chairs, and cookware necessary to furnish common areas are made available to congregate housing or group homes. The 2 percent initial operating capital may be used to purchase these items.
( e ) *Association with other organizations.* Congregate housing and group homes may coordinate services or training with another organization, such as a workshop for the developmentally disabled. However, the housing facility must be a separate entity and not dependent on the other organization.
( f ) *Market feasibility documentation.* Market feasibility documentation for congregate housing and group homes is subject to the following requirements: ( 1 ) Must address the need for housing with services and include information concerning alternative service providers;
( 2 ) Must contain demographic information pertaining to the population that is to be served by the congregate housing or group home project; and
( 3 ) May consider an expanded market area that includes nondesignated places, but the facility must be located in a designated place.
( g ) *Rental assistance for group homes.* A unit in a group home consists of a space occupied by a specific tenant household, which may be an apartment unit, a bedroom, or a part of a bedroom. Agency rental assistance will be made available to tenants sharing a unit so long as the total rent for the unit does not exceed conventional rents for comparable units in the area or a similar area.
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Contents
- Section I - Figures
List of Figures
Asbestosis
Coal Workers' Pneumoconiosis
Silicosis
Exposure to Cotton Dust
Pneumonopathy Due to Inhalation of Other Dust
Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis
Toxic Agents
Dust Diseases of the Lungs
Compensation

- Section II - Tables
List of Detailed Tables
Asbestosis
Coal Workers' Pneumoconiosis
Silicosis
Exposure to Cotton Dust
Pneumonopathy Due to Inhalation of Other Dust
Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis
Toxic Agents
Occupational Illness
Dust Diseases of the Lungs
Dust Exposure Data
Compensation

- Appendix
Sources and Limitations of Data
#### § 4284.17 Member delegate clause.

No Member of Congress shall be admitted to any share or part of a grant program or any benefit that may arise there from, but this provision shall not be construed to bar as a contractor under a grant a publicly held corporation whose ownership might include a Member of Congress.