alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Comverge, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael D. Picchi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that to his knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/Michael D. PicchiMichael D. PicchiExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 9, 2011




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
22.001 Definitions.       *Administrator* or "Administrator, Wage and Hour Division," as used in this part, means the—Administrator                                                   Wage and Hour Division                                                   U.S. Department of Labor                                                   Washington, DC 20210                                                   or an authorized representative.                                                 *Agency labor advisor* means an individual responsible for advising contracting agency officials on Federal contract labor matters.          *e98* means the Department of Labor’s approved electronic application (                https://www.sam.gov                             ), whereby a contracting officer submits pertinent information to the Department of Labor and requests a Service Contract Labor Standards statute wage determination directly from the Wage and Hour Division.          *Service contract* means any Government contract, or subcontract thereunder, the principal purpose of which is to furnish services in the United States through the use of service employees, except as exempted by 41 U.S.C. chapter 67, Service Contract Labor Standards; see 22.1003-3 and 22.1003-4). See 22.1003-5 and 29 CFR 4.130 for a partial list of services covered by the Service Contract Labor Standards statute.          *Service employee* means any person engaged in the performance of a service contract other than any person employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity, as those terms are defined in 29 CFR part 541. The term "service employee" includes all such persons regardless of any contractual relationship that may be alleged to exist between a contractor or subcontractor and such persons.          *Wage Determinations at SAM.gov* means the Government internet website for both Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute and Service Contract Labor Standards statute wage determinations available at https://www.sam.gov.    **Parent topic:** Part 22 - Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Volcom, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), Richard R. Woolcott, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Douglas P. Collier, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Volcom, Inc. and will be retained
by Volcom, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |                                                                                                                            
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2010 |  | /s/ Richard R. Woolcott                                                                                                    
|                        |  | Richard R. Woolcott Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                                     
|                        | 
|Dated: November 9, 2010 |  | /s/ Douglas P. Collier                                                                                                     
|                        |  | Douglas P. Collier Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

The foregoing certifications are being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. These certifications shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by
reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
QUIPP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                 SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

         Diluted                                                              1998             1997              1996
         -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                                           <C>               <C>              <C>       
         Net Income (loss)                                                    $3,347,645        $3,081,304       $2,219,828

                                                                        ----------------------------------------------------

         Weighted average number of common
             shares outstanding during the year                                1,630,706         1,576,556        1,565,765

         Add-common equivalent shares (determined using the
             "treasury stock" method) representing shares
             issuable upon exercise of employee stock options                     76,660            53,657                0
                                                                        ----------------------------------------------------

         Weighted average number of shares used in calculation
             of net income per share                                           1,707,366         1,630,213        1,565,765
                                                                        ----------------------------------------------------

         Diluted income per common and common
             equivalent share                                                       1.96              1.89             1.42
         -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DARIUS DARNELL JONES,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5440-MCR-HTC

GRAHAM FOUNTAIN, et al, 

Defendants.

__________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated July 16, 2020. ECF No. 6. The parties were provided 

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and were afforded an opportunity to file 

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made 

a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection was made.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and all objections thereto 

timely filed, I conclude that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-05440-MCR-HTC Document 10 Filed 08/28/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 6, is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff's 

failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted, failure to prosecute, and failure 

to comply with Court orders. 

3. The clerk is directed to close this case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of August 2020.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05440-MCR-HTC Document 10 Filed 08/28/20 Page 2 of 2
# L_2021384EN.01010801.xml

| 29.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 384/108 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 384/108

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2021/1893

of 28 October 2021

amending Decision 2010/573/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 27 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/573/CFSP (1), concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 27 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/573/CFSP (1), concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova.

| (2) | On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/573/CFSP, the restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova should be extended until 31 October 2022. The Council will carry out a review of the situation with regard to the restrictive measures after six months. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/573/CFSP, the restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova should be extended until 31 October 2022. The Council will carry out a review of the situation with regard to the restrictive measures after six months.

| (3) | Decision 2010/573/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2010/573/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 4(2) of Decision 2010/573/CFSP is hereby replaced by the following:

‘2.   This Decision shall apply until 31 October 2022. It shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed or amended, as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2021.

For the Council

The President

G. DOVŽAN

---

(1)  Council Decision 2010/573/CFSP of 27 September 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova (OJ L 253, 28.9.2010, p. 54).

1

---
§ 400.306 Spouses and minor children. ( a ) The spouse and minor children of an individual are considered to be the same as the individual for purposes of this subpart except that: ( 1 ) The spouse who was actively engaged in farming in a separate farming operation prior to their marriage will be a separate person with respect to that separate farming operation so long as that operation remains separate and distinct from any farming operation conducted by the other spouse;
( 2 ) A minor child who is actively engaged in farming in a separate farming operation will be a separate person with respect to that separate farming operation if: ( i ) The parent or other entity in which the parent has a substantial beneficial interest does not have any interest in the minor's separate farming operation or in any production from such operation;
( ii ) The minor has established and maintains a separate household from the parent;
( iii ) The minor personally carries out the farming activities with respect to the minor's farming operation; and
( iv ) The minor establishes separate accounting and recordkeeping for the minor's farming operation.
( b ) An individual shall be considered to be a minor until the age of 18 is reached. Court proceedings conferring majority on an individual under 18 years of age will not change such individual's status as a minor.
4.905 Solicitation provision.       The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.204-3, Taxpayer Identification, in solicitations that-                                       (a)                    						            Do not include the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management; and                                          (b)                    						            Are not conducted under the procedures of part  12.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 4.9 - Taxpayer Identification Number Information
98-1170.

#### Estate of Glenn v. Lake Hosp. Sys., Inc.

Lake App. No. 96-L-154. Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 1419, 698 N.E.2d 1007. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas and-Resnick, JJ., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                      
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                         549,722
<SECURITIES>                                   131,314
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               922,556
<PP&E>                                         10,603,814
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,381,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,444,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          425,799
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,223,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,444,105
<SALES>                                        508,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               508,477
<CGS>                                          171,987
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  234,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,558)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             116,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,900)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.52)
        


</TABLE>
# Industrial Noise Control Manual

Print

Minus

###### December 1978

###### DHHS (NIOSH) Publication Number 79-117

Employer and employee awareness of the problems of industrial noise has increased notably in the past decade. Industry’s concern about noise, especially since the mid—1960s, has been growing steadily. In the early 1970s the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) established a noise exposure regulation specifically for workplaces. Industry has responded to the new Interest in noise reduction, but has encountered difficulties in correctingindividual noise problems and implementing company—wide noise reduction programs. Company personnel who may have little or no understanding of the causes or solutions of the problems of noise may be asked to select a noise control method or device, to choose noise control materials, to use noise measuring Instruments, or to decide whether to call upon a qualified consultant.

Industrial Noise Control Manual

August 7, 2023
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

- Facebook
- Twitter
- LinkedIn
- Syndicate
# L_2020384EN.01000201.xml

| 17.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 384/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 384/2

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1711

of 10 November 2020

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications

‘Szomolyai rövidszárú fekete cseresznye’ (PDO)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Szomolyai rövidszárú fekete cseresznye’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Szomolyai rövidszárú fekete cseresznye’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Szomolyai rövidszárú fekete cseresznye’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Szomolyai rövidszárú fekete cseresznye’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Szomolyai rövidszárú fekete cseresznye’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6: Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 November 2020.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 235, 17.7.2020, p. 7.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Liberty Energy Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ian Spowart, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of November, 2009.


/s/ Ian Spowart
-------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
1.705 Supersession and modification.

(a) If a D&F is superseded by another D&F, that action shall not render invalid any action taken

under the original D&F prior to the date of its supersession.

(b) The contracting officer need not cancel the solicitation if the D&F, as modified, supports the

contract action.

Parent topic: Subpart 1.7 - Determinations and Findings
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:02cr36-SPM/AK

JASEN ALLEN BADIA,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

This cause comes before the Court upon Defendant Jasen Allen Badia’s

notice of appeal, which has been treated in accordance with Federal Rule of

Appellate Procedure 22(b) and 28 United States Code, Section 2253(c), as a

motion for certificate of appealability. Doc. 136. The Court will not issue a

certificate of appealability because Defendant has failed to make a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 

For reasons explained in the Report and Recommendation (doc. 128),

Defendant has not demonstrated deficient performance on any of the grounds

advanced on his conflict of interest claim. Defendant’s claim that his lawyer

failed to properly inform him of his right to testify was not credible. In any event,

Defendant did not demonstrate any resulting prejudice. Finally, Defendant’s

claims under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005) are not cognizable on

collateral review. Varela v. United States, 400 F.3d 864 (11th Cir. 2005). Based

Case 4:02-cr-00036-SPM-AK Document 137 Filed 03/26/08 Page 1 of 2
on the foregoing, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion for certificate of appealability

(doc. 136) is denied. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of March, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cr-00036-SPM-AK Document 137 Filed 03/26/08 Page 2 of 2