alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013313EN.01003001.xml

| 22.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 313/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 313/30

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1183/2013

of 12 November 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Slovenski med (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovenia’s application to register the name ‘Slovenski med’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovenia’s application to register the name ‘Slovenski med’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 November 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Algirdas ŠEMETA

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 157, 4.6.2013, p. 12.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.4.   Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.)

SLOVENIA

Slovenski med (PGI)

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Juan OBANDO-ROMERO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-4707.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 18, 2007.

Decided: Aug. 24, 2007.

*227Michael S. Nachmanoff, Acting Federal Public Defender, Mary E. Maguire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Sara E. Flannery, Assistant United States Attorney, Bonnie B. Silcox, Third Year Intern, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Juan Obando-Romero pled guilty to simple assault on a federal officer, 18 U.S.C.A. § 111(a) (West Supp.2007) (Count Two), and possession of contraband in prison, 18 U.S.C. § 1791(a)(2) (2000) (Count Three), and was sentenced to forty-one months imprisonment. ObandoRomero appeals his sentence, contending that his sentence was unreasonable because the district court applied a two-level enhancement for bodily injury. *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 2A2.4(b)(2) (2005). We affirm.

During a search which revealed that he was in possession of marijuana, federal inmate Obando-Romero elbowed Correctional Officer Doyle Cox in the face, breaking his glasses. Cox suffered abrasions on his nose and cheeks, and subsequently developed a black eye. At the sentencing hearing, over Obando-Romero’s objection, the district court determined that Cox’s injury was sufficient to warrant the enhancement.

Application Note 1 to § 2A2.4 provides that the term “bodily injury,” as used in § 2A2.4, is defined in the commentary to USSG § 1B1.1. Application Note 1(B) to § 1B1.1 defines “bodily injury” as “any significant injury; *e.g.,*an injury that is painful and obvious, or is of a type for which medical attention ordinarily would be sought.” We review the district court’s determination that a significant injury was sustained under the clearly erroneous standard. *United States v. Lancaster,*6 F.3d 208, 210 (4th Cir.1993); *United States v. Isaacs,*947 F.2d 112, 114 (4th Cir.1991).

Here, the court viewed a photograph of Cox which showed his black eye. The injury was obvious and the court could safely infer that it was painful. We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in determining that the enhancement applied.

Accordingly, we affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
19.502-2 Total small business set-asides.

(a) Before setting aside an acquisition under this paragraph, refer to 19.203(b). Each acquisition of

supplies or services that has an anticipated dollar value above the micro-purchase threshold, but not

over the simplified acquisition threshold, shall be set aside for small business unless the contracting

officer determines there is not a reasonable expectation of obtaining offers from two or more

responsible small business concerns that are competitive in terms of fair market prices, quality, and

delivery. If the contracting officer receives only one acceptable offer from a responsible small

business concern in response to a set-aside, the contracting officer should make an award to that

firm. If the contracting officer receives no acceptable offers from responsible small business

concerns, the set-aside shall be withdrawn and the requirement, if still valid, shall be resolicited on

an unrestricted basis. The small business set-aside does not preclude the award of a contract as

described in 19.203.

(b) Before setting aside an acquisition under this paragraph, refer to 19.203(c). The contracting

officer shall set aside any acquisition over the simplified acquisition threshold for small business

participation when there is a reasonable expectation that-

(1) Offers will be obtained from at least two responsible small business concerns; and

(2) Award will be made at fair market prices. Total small business set-asides shall not be made

unless such a reasonable expectation exists (see 19.502-3 for partial set-asides). Although past

acquisition history and market research of an item or similar items are always important, these are

not the only factors to be considered in determining whether a reasonable expectation exists. In

making research and development small business set-asides, there must also be a reasonable

expectation of obtaining from small businesses the best scientific and technological sources

consistent with the demands of the proposed acquisition for the best mix of cost, performances, and

schedules.

Parent topic: 19.502 Setting aside acquisitions.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 5:89cr5014-WS

IVORY JOE PRUITT,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 137)

docketed September 7, 2006. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

"Motion to Void a Complete Miscarriage of Justice" (doc. 133), "Motion for This Court to

Take Judicial Notice" (doc. 135), and "Motion for This Court to Entertain and Hear This

Jurisdictional 'Void-for-Vagueness' Question" (doc. 136) be summarily dismissed. The

defendant has filed objections (doc. 138) to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record in light of the defendant’s objections, the court has

determined that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 137) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

Case 5:89-cr-05014-RS-WCS Document 139 Filed 09/29/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:89cr5014-WS

2. The defendant’s "Motion to Void a Complete Miscarriage of Justice" (doc.

133), "Motion for This Court to Take Judicial Notice" (doc. 135), and "Motion for This

Court to Entertain and Hear This Jurisdictional 'Void-for-Vagueness' Question" (doc.

136) are hereby summarily DISMISSED because leave for filing a second or successive

section 2255 motion has not been granted by the court of appeals. 

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of September , 2006.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:89-cr-05014-RS-WCS Document 139 Filed 09/29/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ROBERT JOHNSON,

D.O.C. #L10847,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 4:20cv410-MW/MAF

CAPTAIN A. MASSEY,

et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

By prior order, this Court rejected the report and recommendation regarding 

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment concluding there are genuine issues of 

material fact in dispute and remanded this case to the Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 51. 

Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 45, is DENIED and the 

Clerk is directed to terminate the motion. 

SO ORDERED on March 8, 2022.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00410-MW-MAF Document 52 Filed 03/08/22 Page 1 of 1
#### § 3300.28 Response to application for renewal of approval.

The Administrator will, within 30 days of receipt of application and any relevant information required, advise the applicant whether or not approval is renewed. A renewal is good for 5 years.
#### § 51.1439 Premier half-kernel (Premier halves).

*Premier half-kernel (Premier halves)* means one of the separated halves of an entire pecan kernel with not more than one-eighth of its original volume missing, exclusive of the portion which formerly connected the two halves of the kernel.
§ 5001.455 Periodic guarantee retention fee. The Agency will collect a periodic guarantee retention fee from the lender for as long as the loan note guarantee is outstanding in accordance with the annual notice published in the Federal Register in accordance with § 5001.10. Payment of the periodic guarantee retention fee is required to maintain the validity of the loan note guarantee. The lender may pass the fee on to the borrower but may not delay payment of the fee to the Agency while collecting the payment from the borrower. The fee rates may differ by program as published annually in a document in the Federal Register in accordance with § 5001.10. The annual Federal Register notification will include the frequency of payment for the fees. ( a ) *Calculation.* The guarantee retention fee is calculated by multiplying the full outstanding principal guaranteed loan balance as of a date(s) as published in the annual Federal Register notification, by the percentage of guarantee, by the fee rate as noted in the guaranteed loan conditional commitment.
( b ) *Effective fee rate.* The effective guarantee retention fee rate that is published in a Federal Register document in accordance with § 5001.10 at the time the guaranteed loan is obligated will be noted in the guarantee loan conditional commitment and the fee will remain in effect for the life of the loan note guarantee.
( c ) *Payments.* The guarantee retention fee payment frequency and related due date provisions will be published in the annual Federal Register notification. ( 1 ) Guarantee retention fee payments not received within 60 days after their due date are considered delinquent and, at the Agency's discretion, may result in cancellation of the loan note guarantee to the lender. The Agency will provide the lender 30 calendar days' written notice that the fee is delinquent before canceling the loan note guarantee. Holders' rights will continue in effect as specified in the loan note guarantee and assignment guarantee agreement, unless the holder took possession of an interest in the loan note guarantee knowing guarantee retention fees had not been paid.
( 2 ) Until the loan note guarantee is canceled by the Agency, any delinquent periodic guarantee retention fee will bear interest at the promissory note rate.
( 3 ) When the Agency repurchases 100 percent of the guaranteed portion of the guaranteed loan as prescribed in § 5001.511(c), the Agency will discontinue collection of the periodic guarantee retention fee.
( d ) *Secondary market prohibition.* Lenders are prohibited from selling any portion of the guaranteed loan on the secondary market if there are unpaid periodic guarantee retention fees.
§ 4280.63 Exception authority. Except as specified in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section, the RBS Administrator may, on a case-by-case basis, make exceptions to any requirement or provision of this subpart, if such exception is necessary to implement the intent of the authorizing statute in a time of national emergency or in accordance with a Presidentially-declared disaster, or when such an exception is in the best interests of the Federal Government and is otherwise not in conflict with applicable law. ( a ) *Applicant eligibility.* No exception to applicant eligibility can be made.
( b ) *Project eligibility.* No exception to project eligibility can be made.
( c ) *Rural area definition.* No exception to the definition of rural area, as defined, can be made.
Case 3:20-cv-05697-TKW-EMT   Document 2   Filed 07/29/20   Page 1 of 2

Case 3:20-cv-05697-TKW-EMT   Document 2   Filed 07/29/20   Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Michael Horan, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB (the “Annual Report”) of Dynatem, Inc. (the “Company”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and otherfinancial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report; 

 

4. The Company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Omitted; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Annual Reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Dated:  August 15, 2003
§ 370.5 Requests for records. ( a ) Requests for APHIS records or information other than material published or made available under the preceding sections, shall be made in writing in accordance with 7 CFR 1.3(a) and submitted to the APHIS Freedom of Information Act Coordinator at the following address: Freedom of Information Act Coordinator, (FOIA Request), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Legislative and Public Affairs, Freedom of Information, 4700 River Road, Unit 50, Riverdale, Maryland 20737-1231.
The request shall identify each record with reasonable specificity as prescribed in § 1.3(b) of this title. The APHIS FOIA Coordinator is hereby delegated authority to make determinations with respect to such requests in accordance with 7 CFR.
( b ) The FOIA Coordinator or his designee is authorized to receive requests and to exercise the authority under § 1.4(c) of this title to: ( 1 ) Make determinations to grant or deny requests,
( 2 ) Extend the administrative deadline,
( 3 ) Make discretionary releases of exempt records, and
( 4 ) Make determinations regarding charges pursuant to the fee schedule.
( c ) In exercising his authority under § 1.4(c) of this title to grant and deny requests, the Coordinator will comply with subsection (b) of the Freedom of Information Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552(b)), which requires that any reasonably segregable portion of a document shall be provided to a person requesting such document after deletion of any portions which are exempt under the Act. Therefore, unless the disclosable and non-disclosable portions are so inextricably linked that it is not reasonably possible to separate them, the document will be released with the non-disclosable portions deleted, except that the Coordinator may exercise discretion as limited by § 1.11 of this title, to release the entire document, or to make only a minimum number of deletions, e.g., the names of individuals.
[40 FR 43223, Sept. 19, 1975, as amended at 44 FR 53490, Sept. 14, 1979; 51 FR 30837, Aug. 29, 1986; 59 FR 67611, Dec. 30, 1994]
#### § 51.1318 Black end.

*Black end* is evidenced by an abnormally deep green color around the calyx, or black spots usually occurring on the one-third of the surface nearest to the calyx, or by an abnormally shallow calyx cavity.
**Bureau of Land Management							Environmental Education
**K****i****d****'****s********C****o****r****n****e****r**
****

**Walk on the Wild Side:			Explore Your Public Lands**

Did you know that there are millions of acres of land in this country that belong to you? 223 million hectares (550 million acres), to be more specific. This land is not owned by any individual or company. Instead, it's Federal land and it's owned by the American people . . . and that means you!
We developed a booklet of amazing facts and activities about America's Public Lands. Each page describes something about the land, or what you can do to protect it. Each page also has an activity that you can do on your own to learn more about Public Lands--perfect for when you're stuck in the back seat of the minivan on the way to a National Monument!

We have made available the pages and activities of Walk on the Wild Side for you to download and print out. They are in "PDF" form, which means you will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader to see them. To get the Adobe Acrobat Reader, click here.

Good luck--and don't check the answers until you are ready.CONTENTS
To Teachers and Parents

America's Public Lands**Activity:** Map Talk

What Can You See?**Activity:** I Spy Scramble

What Can You Do?**Activity:** Just Imagine

Silent Invaders (Weeds)**Activity:**Where's Weedo?

Burning Point (Wildfires)**Activity:**Little House Near the Wildlands

On the Edge **Activity**: Down by the Riverside

Forest Keepers (Wildlife) **Activity:** Finding Forest Friends

Creature Feature (Wildlife)**Activity**: Habitat Match-up

Horsing Around (Wild Horses and Burros)**Activity:** Mustang Roundup

Riches from the Earth (Minerals)**Activity**: Minerals Match

Secret Chambers (Caves)**Activity:** Cave Pictionary

Paleopuzzles (Dinosaurs)**Activity**: Boneyard Mystery

Time Travel (Archaeology)**Activity**: The Past: Can You Dig It?

The Big Squeeze (Using Public Lands)**Activity:** Climbing the Chart

The Big Picture (Watersheds)**Activity:** Making Connections

Help Wanted (Careers in Public Lands)**Activity:** Career Fair

Doing Your Part (Ethics)**Activity:** Leave No Trace

Answers to Activity Pages.

**Return to the BLM****Environmental Education****Home Page******Environmental Education****News and Features****

For questions about our Kids Activity Guide contact Betsy Wooster			This site is maintained by Kevin Flynn

Last updated: April 12, 2001

Bureau of Land Management			Environmental Education and Volunteer Programs

**
#### §§ 5001.11-5001.99 [Reserved]