alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 231 (Thursday, December 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30284]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than December 17, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Texas Country Bancshares Inc., Brady, Texas; to engage de novo 
through its subsidiary bank, in lending activities pursuant to section 
225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 29, 
2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-30284 Filed 12-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 for May Limited  Partnership 1984-2 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000757385
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1984-2
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         67
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  56
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         325
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   448
<SALES>                                        216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  35
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                129
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            129
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   129
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                 PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of uniView
 Technologies Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31,
 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
 hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick A. Custer, Chief Executive Officer
 and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. S1350, as adopted pursuant to S906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
 of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.


                                    /s/  PATRICK A. CUSTER
                                    ----------------------
                                    Patrick A. Custer
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Principal Financial Officer

 May 20, 2003
98-1671.

#### State ex rel. Watkins v. Crawford.

In Procedendo. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,552
<SECURITIES>                                     3,144
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,847
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,680
<INVENTORY>                                      1,470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,863
<PP&E>                                          11,875
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,829
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,157
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,961
<SALES>                                         52,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,150
<CGS>                                           14,968
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,820
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    362
<INCOME-TAX>                                       127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                235
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
# L_2021387EN.01007701.xml

| 3.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 387/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 387/77

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/1899

of 25 October 2021

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Fertőd vidéki sárgarépa’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Fertőd vidéki sárgarépa’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Fertőd vidéki sárgarépa’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Fertőd vidéki sárgarépa’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Fertőd vidéki sárgarépa’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Fertőd vidéki sárgarépa’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 October 2021.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 283, 15.7.2021, p. 12.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1187. KEVIN L. PELLETT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

BOARD OF REVIEW.

In this direct appeal, Kevin Pellett seeks review of the superior court’s order

affirming the decision of the Georgia Department of Labor to deny his claim for

pandemic unemployment benefits. Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), however, a party

seeking to appeal a superior court decision reviewing a state agency ruling must follow

the discretionary appeal procedure. See Dunlap v. City of Atlanta, 272 Ga. 523, 524

(531 SE2d 702) (2000). Because Pellett failed to follow the proper appellate

procedure, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See id.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

April 12, 2024

04/12/2024
15.403-2 Other circumstances where

certified cost or pricing data are not

required.

(a) The exercise of an option at the price established at contract award or initial negotiation does not

require submission of certified cost or pricing data.

(b) Certified cost or pricing data are not required for proposals used solely for overrun funding or

interim billing price adjustments.

Parent topic: 15.403 Obtaining certified cost or pricing data.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of The Furia Organization, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 6, 2004 (the "Report"), I,
Martin Cohen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Martin Cohen
------------------------------
Martin Cohen
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
July 6, 2004


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Louis Grinthal, as Administrator of the Estate of Jamie Grinthal, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. Stanley Sharp, Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury of a minor child and for loss of services and medical expenses of the child’s father, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered February 17, 1969 in favor of plaintiffs, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted in the interests of justice, with costs to abide the event. The findings of fact are affirmed. In our opinion this was a close ease on liability. There were no eyewitnesses to the actual impact. In the posture of the record, we are of the view that prejudicial error was committed by reception into evidence of the testimony of plaintiff’s sole, nontreating medical expert to the effect that the major injury sustained by the infant could not have been caused by impact with the bicycle operated by defendant at the speed subsequently testified to by him. Clearly, the speed of defendant’s bicycle before impact was crucial on the issue of negligence. In addition, there appears to be no proof or claim that the impact between the two bicycles caused the infant’s major injury. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Randolph Gress,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos Investments Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by
Innophos Investments Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned
expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                      |  |                                                                                  
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2006 |  | /s/    RANDOLPH GRESS                                                            
|                      |  | Randolph Gress Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
(April 15, 1970)

#### Angelo Grinaldo, Appellant, v. Henry Meusburger, Respondent.

Motion to amend decision dated March 2,1970 (34 A D 2d 586) granted, without costs, and decision amended to read “ Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs”. Cross motion denied, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur.
# L_2021158DE.01002501.xml

| 6.5.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 158/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 158/25

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2021/241 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 12. Februar 2021 zur Einrichtung der Aufbau- und Resilienzfazilität

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 57 vom 18. Februar 2021
  )

Seite 34, Artikel 10 Absatz 5 Buchstabe c

Anstatt:

| „c) | beim Fall der Nichteinhaltung einer empfohlenen Korrekturmaßnahme im Rahmen eines Verfahrens bei einem übermäßigen Defizit gemäß Absatz 2 Buchstabe b;“ |
| --- | --- |

„c)

beim Fall der Nichteinhaltung einer empfohlenen Korrekturmaßnahme im Rahmen eines Verfahrens bei einem übermäßigen Defizit gemäß Absatz 2 Buchstabe b;“

muss es heißen:

| „c) | beim Fall der Nichteinhaltung einer empfohlenen Korrekturmaßnahme im Rahmen eines Verfahrens bei einem übermäßigen Ungleichgewicht gemäß Absatz 2 Buchstabe b;“. |
| --- | --- |

„c)

beim Fall der Nichteinhaltung einer empfohlenen Korrekturmaßnahme im Rahmen eines Verfahrens bei einem übermäßigen Ungleichgewicht gemäß Absatz 2 Buchstabe b;“.

---
9.108-5 Solicitation provision and contract

clause.

The contracting officer shall-

(a) Include the provision at 52.209-2, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic

Corporations-Representation, in each solicitation for the acquisition of products or services

(including construction); and

(b) Include the clause at 52.209-10, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations,

in each solicitation and contract for the acquisition of products or services (including construction).

Parent topic: 9.108 Prohibition on contracting with inverted domestic corporations.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 52
          - [R09-OAR-2010-0718; FRL-9233-1]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Withdrawal of direct final rule.

# SUMMARY:

Due to the receipt of an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing the November 2, 2010 (75 FR 67220), direct final rule determining that the Hayden, Nogales, and Paul Spur/Douglas areas in Arizona had attained the national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than or equal to ten microns by the applicable attainment date. On the basis of this determination, EPA concluded that these three “moderate” nonattainment areas were not subject to reclassification. In the direct final rule, EPA stated that if adverse comments were submitted by December 2, 2010, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. On November 3, 2010, EPA received a comment. EPA believes this comment is adverse and, therefore, EPA is withdrawing the direct final rule. EPA will address the comment in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed action also published on November 2, 2010 (75 FR 67303). EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.

# DATES:

The direct final rule published at 75 FR 67220 on November 2, 2010, is withdrawn as of November 29, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Wienke Tax, Air Planning Office, Air Division (AIR-2), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 947-4192,                         *tax.wienke@epa.gov*.                    

# List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

        - Environmental protection
        - Air pollution control
        - Incorporation by reference
        - National Parks
        - Particulate matter
        - Wilderness Areas

Authority:42 U.S.C. 7401*et seq.*

Dated: November 19, 2010.

Keith Takata,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

[FR Doc. 2010-29937 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### Monroe Yale Mann, Respondent, v Bernard Abel et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted June 4, 2007;

decided June 28, 2007

Reported below, 37 AD3d 778.

Motion by Advance Publications, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the Court’s examination of its subject matter jurisdiction of the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.