1 In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ NO
. 09 -20- 00 0 40 -CV

__________________
KYLE M. JAEGER AND JAEGER REO HOLDING TRUST , Appellants V. SCOTT BROWN, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County , Texas Trial Cause No. 18

- 05

- 06244 -CV

__________________________________________________________________ SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION On August 4, 2022, we issued our original opinion in this case, conditionally affirming the trial court ’ s judgment and suggesting a remittitur , which when combined total s $247,500

. See Tex. R. App. P.
46.3. We further provided that should the appellee, Scott Brown, file a remittitur within fifteen days from the date of our opinion and agree to2 accept the proposed remittitur , we would reform the trial co urt ’ s judgment , reduc ing the trial court’s awards of economic and punitive damages to the amounts the evidence supported and then affirm the judgment as reformed , except for the amount award ed to Brown for attorney’s fees

. On August 19, 2022 , Brown filed a remittitur with the Clerk of the Court, in which he stated he would accept the remittitur , as suggested by the Court . In the remittitur that Brown filed , he asked the Court to affirm the economic and exemplary damages awards as reformed

. Because Brown agreed to the proposed remittitur, we issue this supplemental opinion . I n accordance with our original opinion and Brown’s timely

- filed remittitur, the trial court ’ s judgment is reformed as follows. The trial court’s economic and exemplary da mages awards are reduced by $247,500, which represents a reduction of $83,500 of the amount awarded in the original judgment as economic damages and a reduction of $165,000 of the amount awarded in the original judgment as exemplary damages

. Consequently, page two of the trial court’s Final Default Judgment , as reformed , state s : It is ORDERED, ADJUDED and DECREED that Scott Brown, Plaintiff, shall have as JUDGMENT against Kyle M.3 Jaeger and the Jaeger Reo Holding Trust, Defendants, the following: Economi c Damages in the amount of $409,250.00. Exemplary Damages in the amount of $818,500.00. To the extent the judgment award s attorney’s fees to Scott Brown, the Court REVERSES the attorney’s fees award, and we REMAND the

case to the trial court for further proceedings solely on Brown’s claims against Kyle M. Jaeger and the Jaeger Reo Holding Trust on the issue of attorney’s fee s, if any, recoverable under the theories raised by Brown in Plaintiff’s Original Petition. And since the appellants did not challenge the trial court’s awards of prejudgment or post

- judgment interest in their appeal from the trial court’s judgment , those awards are affirmed. Because the appellants were successful in only a small part o f their appeal, we order costs of the appeal assessed ninety percent (90%) against the appellants and ten percent (10%) against the appellee. Based on the above, the trial c ourt ’ s judgment , with the exception of the attorney’s fees awarded in the trial court’s judgment, is affirmed as reformed. The Court’s original opinion explain ing how the Court resolved the issues raised in the appeal remains in effect.4 We order the Court’s decision certified below for observance. AFFIRMED AS REFORMED IN PART , REVERSED AND REMAND ED IN PART.

_______ __________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice Submitted on September 28, 2021 Opinion Deliv ered September 8, 2022 Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.