alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31
Section 302 Certifications I, Catherine Balloqui, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 of Terra Energy Resources, Ltd. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operation and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), and I have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to me. (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of the internal cover over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Dated: April 15, 2009 By: _/s/Catherine Balloqui__Catherine Balloqui 
President, Secretary, Treasurer, 
Director, and Chief Financial Officer 
and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 5:00cr32-SPM

JUDY GRACE SELLERS,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EARLY

TERMINATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

This cause comes before the Court for consideration of Defendant’s letter

dated September 19, 2005, which has been treated as a motion for early

termination of supervised release. (Doc. 86). Defendant has been on

supervised release for approximately 14 months, during which time she has

complied with all conditions. 

After a period of one year, supervised release may be terminated if

“warranted by the conduct of the defendant released and in the interest of

justice.” 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). The statute directs the Court to make an

evaluation based on 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1) (nature and circumstances of the

offense and the defendant's history and characteristics), (a)(2)(B) (need to deter

criminal conduct), (a)(2)(C) (need to protect public from further crime by

defendant), (a)(2)(D) (need to provide defendant with correctional treatment),

Case 5:00-cr-00032-SPM Document 87 Filed 10/20/05 Page 1 of 2
(a)(4) (the kinds of sentences and sentencing range established for defendants

with similar characteristics under applicable Sentencing Commission guidelines

and policy statements), (a)(5) (any pertinent policy statement of the Sentencing

Commission in effect on the date of sentencing), and (a)(6) (need to avoid

unwarranted disparities among similar defendants).

In considering these factors, the Court notes that Defendant absconded

before sentencing and remained a fugitive from April 30, 2001 until she was

arrested in Biloxi, Mississippi on May 30, 2002. See doc. 47. Since being

released from prison (for making and passing off counterfeit currency and for

failure to appear), Defendant has not integrated into the community. Defendant

is dependent on others for her support, which adds to the risk that she may

reoffend. 

Upon completion of two years of supervised release, Defendant may

reapply for early termination. At this time, however, it is in the interest of justice

to keep Defendant on supervised release to insure that Defendant remains in

compliance with the law. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s motion for early

termination of supervised release (doc. 86) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of October, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 5:00-cr-00032-SPM Document 87 Filed 10/20/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Kohlberg Capital
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Michael I. Wirth, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 29, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/    MICHAEL I.
WIRTH                                                                          
|                     |  |     |  | Michael I. Wirth                                                                                 
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Frank Joseph Mason, administrator of the Estate of Katherine Mason, deceased, appellee, v. Isaac Goldman, appellant.

Gen. No. 37,012.

Opinion filed October 24, 1934.

Rider & Thuma, for appellant; Chester D. Kern, of counsel. Blake, Burns & Campbell, for appellee; Harris J. Blake, Jr., of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Hebei

delivered the opinion of the court.
Case 5:20-cv-00133-AW-MJF   Document 3   Filed 10/08/15   Page 1 of 6

Case 5:20-cv-00133-AW-MJF   Document 3   Filed 10/08/15   Page 2 of 6

Case 5:20-cv-00133-AW-MJF   Document 3   Filed 10/08/15   Page 3 of 6

Case 5:20-cv-00133-AW-MJF   Document 3   Filed 10/08/15   Page 4 of 6

Case 5:20-cv-00133-AW-MJF   Document 3   Filed 10/08/15   Page 5 of 6

Case 5:20-cv-00133-AW-MJF   Document 3   Filed 10/08/15   Page 6 of 6
22.403-3 Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards.       40 U.S.C.chpater 37, Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards, requires that certain contracts (see 22.305) contain a clause (see 52.222-4) specifying that no laborer or mechanic doing any part of the work contemplated by the contract shall be required or permitted to work more than 40 hours in any workweek unless paid for all additional hours at not less than 1 1/2 times the basic rate of pay (see 22.301).    **Parent topic:** 22.403 Statutory, Executive Order, and regulatory requirements.
#### Joseph D. Stim, Appellant, v. Muriel Lap et al., Defendants, and David M. Roseman et al., Respondents.

Order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 9, 1965, affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with $10 costs and disbursements (Real Property Law, § 291-e). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 3201.115 Intermediates—Binders. ( a ) *Definition.* Intermediates—Binders are materials used to provide cohesiveness throughout an entire finished product. Binders are generally polymers or polymer precursors (such as epoxies) and include the polymeric materials used to formulate coatings, adhesives, sealants, and elastomers. The product category does not include adhesives and glues that are finished products used to attach the surfaces of two or more distinct and separate components to one another.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 47 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 10, 2019, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased Intermediates—Binders. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased Intermediates—Binders.
[83 FR 31848, July 10, 2018]
2006-0519.

#### Langley v. Sherck.

In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.470 Prior approval of merger, consolidation, or reorganization of RBIC.

You may not merge, consolidate, change form of organization (corporation, limited liability company, or limited partnership) or reorganize without the Agency's prior written approval. Any such merger, consolidation, or change of form is subject to § 4290.440.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Jerome Allen, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on April 18, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Lupiano and Bloom, JJ.
RVAAC Sub-committee on Rooms and Spaces - Meeting #2

Conference Call – June 19, 2014 (1 to 3 pm ET)

Agenda

1. Introductions – Jim Pecht/Rose

2. Categorize elements in the various rooms and spaces requiring 

access – Dennis Cannon

2.1 Sleeper Car Compartments

2.2 Toilet and Bathing Rooms

3. Discuss possible scoping requirements for identified elements–

Dennis Cannon

4. Sub-committee Homework – Dennis Cannon

5. Date of next conference call: July 17th, 1-3 pm

6. Closing remarks

Attachments
# 27.204 Patented technology under trade agreements.

- 27.204-1 Use of patented technology under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. 
- 27.204-2 Use of patented technology under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 27.2 - Patents and Copyrights
```

[108th Congress Public Law 403]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ403.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 2258]]

Public Law 108-403
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
United States Route 1 in Ridgeway, North Carolina, as the ``Eva Holtzman 
         Post Office''. <<NOTE: Oct. 30, 2004 -  [H.R. 5039]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at United 
States Route 1 in Ridgeway, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Eva Holtzman Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Eva Holtzman Post Office''.

    Approved October 30, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5039:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Sept. 22, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 10, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit
      33 c)


REPORT
      ON
      ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE





First
      American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of The
      First American Corporation, and the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
      assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006, and for the period from January
      1,
      2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing
      criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(l)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
      (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code
      of
      Federal Regulations (the "CFR") applicable to the Asserting Party (the
      "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report
      include all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which
      the Asserting Party served as the residential tax service provider (the
      "Platform").





The
      Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
      Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that, except as set forth
      herein below, the Asserting Party has complied, m all material respects, with
      the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
      Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.





The
        Asserting Party assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
        for the Reporting Period and has identified a material instance of noncompliance
        with the servicing criterion sot forth in Section 229.1 122(d)(2)(vii)(B)
        of the
        CFR with respect to the Platform. Specifically, the Asserting Party did not
        prepare reconciliations for all asset-backed securities related bank accounts
        within 30 calendar days after the bank statement cut-off date or such number
        of
        days specified in the transaction agreements.





PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
      report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
      as
      of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this
      assertion.





FIRST
      AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.


By:
      First
      American Real Estate Solutions LLC


General
      Partner


/s/
      Lucy
      A. Przybyla


Lucy
      A.
      Przybyla


Senior
      Vice President


February
      28, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         103,080
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,595,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    413,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,118,263
<PP&E>                                         236,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,073,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,980,683
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,128,370
<COMMON>                                       143,091
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,073,970
<SALES>                                        684,709
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               684,709
<CGS>                                          632,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  632,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,177,716
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             334,307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (501,770)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (501,770)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
19.1403          Status.(a) Status as an SDVOSB concern is determined by SBA in accordance with 13 CFR part 128; also see 19.307.                             (b)                   For an SDVOSB concern that seeks an SDVOSB set-aside or sole-source contract, the contracting officer shall verify that the offeror—                                      (1)                         Effective January 1, 2024, is designated in the System for Award Management (SAM) as an SDVOSB concern certified by SBA; or                                         (2)                         Has represented that it is an SDVOSB concern in SAM and submitted an application for certification to SBA on or before December 31, 2023. Pending applications for certification are in the SBA Veteran Small Business Certification Program database at https://veterans.certify.sba.gov.                                                (c)                   If there is a decision issued by SBA as a result of a current eligibility examination finding that the concern did not qualify as an SDVOSB concern eligible under the SDVOSB Program or SBA denies a concern’s application for SDVOSB certification, the concern must update its SDVOSB status in SAM within 2 days of SBA’s final decision to reflect that the concern is not an eligible SDVOSB. SBA will update the concern’s SDVOSB status in SAM within 2 days of the concern’s failure to make the update.                             (d)                   Effective January 1, 2024, a joint venture may be considered an SDVOSB concern eligible under the SDVOSB Program if—                                      (1)                         The joint venture qualifies as small under 19.301-1(a)(2)(i);                                         (2)                         The managing SDVOSB joint venture partner—                                                  (i)                               Is designated in SAM as an SDVOSB concern certified by SBA; or                                                     Has represented that it is an SDVOSB concern in SAM and submitted an application for certification to SBA on or before December 31, 2023. Pending applications for certification are in the SBA Veteran Small Business Certification database at https://veterans.certify.sba.gov; and                               (ii)                                                                  (3)                         The joint venture complies with the requirements of 13 CFR 128.402.**Parent topic:** Subpart 19.14 - Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program
#### REISS, Appellant, v. PFEIFFER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by Solomon L. Reiss, as surviving partner, against William Pfeiffer, as executor, etc., of Minnie Pfeiffer, deceased, and others.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal denied:
**PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT**

BAYBERRY CROSSING

 

This **PROPERTY/MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT**(the “Agreement”) is dated as of March 15,**2005 between SECURED INVESTMENT RESOURCES FUND, L.P. II, a Delaware limited partnership (“Owner”), and WINBURY REALTY OF K.C., INC., a Missouri corporation (“Manager”).

 

Owner owns the retail shopping center commonly known as Bayberry Crossing, located at 523 SE Melody Lane, Lee’s Summit, MO 64063 (the “Property”). Owner desires to engage Manager, and Manager desires to accept such engagement, to manage, lease, operate, and maintain the Property on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein.

 

THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

 

**ARTICLE 1. COMMENCEMENT AND TERM**

 

1.1      Commencement and Term. Manager’s duties and responsibilities under this Agreement shall begin on the date hereof (the “Start Date”) and shall terminate on the earlier of (i) the conveyance of the Property or any portion thereof, as to such conveyed portion thereof only, or (ii) termination as provided in Article 10.

 

**ARTICLE 2. MANAGER’S RESPONSIBILITIES**

 

2.1      Management. Manager shall manage, operate and maintain the Property in an efficient and economic manner and shall arrange the performance of everything reasonably necessary to accomplish the foregoing, subject to the budgets, policies and limitations provided to Manager in writing by Owner from time to time. Manager shall keep the Property clean and in good repair, shall promptly order and supervise the completion of such repairs as may be required and shall generally do and perform, or cause to be done or performed, all things necessary or desirable to ensure the proper and efficient management, operation, and maintenance of the Property. Manager shall perform all services in a diligent and professional manner. Additionally, Manager shall upon Owner’s request cooperate with any proposed purchaserof the Property, any proposed lender evaluating the Property as collateral or any broker named by Owner in connection with a sale or financing of the Property. Manager is hereby authorized to take any action with respect to the Property which Manager believes in good faith is necessary for Manager to comply with all laws, rules and regulations applicable to Manager, as a licensed real estate broker or otherwise, and, when possible, Manager agrees to provide advance notice to and consult with Owner about any such action that has not been previously authorized. Manager shall exercise reasonable efforts to comply with all directions or instructions from Owner pertaining to the Property.

 

----