UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14099


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



         California                                               94-2940204
(State or other jurisdiction of                                (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

<PAGE>

                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     Financial Statements


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                               September 30, 2003
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $ 241
   Receivables and deposits                                                      30
   Other assets                                                                 139
   Investment property:
      Land                                                    $ 916
      Buildings and related personal property                 10,459
                                                              11,375
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (6,009)         5,366

                                                                            $ 5,776
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 28
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           97
   Accrued property taxes                                                       111
   Other liabilities                                                            138
   Mortgage note payable                                                      5,079

Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
   General partner                                             $ (2)
   Special limited partners                                      (73)
   Limited partners (181,300 units issued and
      outstanding)                                               398            323

                                                                            $ 5,776

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          Three Months               Nine Months
                                       Ended September 30,       Ended September 30,
                                        2003         2002         2003         2002

   Revenues:
<S>                                    <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
      Rental income                    $ 435        $ 446        $ 1,252      $ 1,313
      Other income                         59           70           183          177
      Casualty gain (Note C)               --           --            --           18
          Total revenues                  494          516         1,435        1,508

   Expenses:
      Operating                           222          204           624          575
      General and administrative           27           41            78          121
      Depreciation                        116          112           356          337
      Interest                            100          105           305          319
      Property taxes                       39           38           117          106
          Total expenses                  504          500         1,480        1,458

   Net (loss) income                   $ (10)        $ 16         $ (45)       $ 50

   Net (loss) income allocated to
      general partner (0.2%)            $ --         $ --         $ --         $ --

   Net (loss) income allocated to
      limited partners (99.8%)            (10)          16           (45)          50

                                       $ (10)        $ 16         $ (45)       $ 50

   Net (loss) income per limited
      partnership unit                $ (0.06)      $ 0.09       $ (0.25)     $ 0.28


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>


<PAGE>

                         CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIENCY) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                    Limited                 Special
                                  Partnership    General    Limited   Limited
                                     Units       Partner   Partners   Partners     Total

<S>                                 <C>            <C>       <C>      <C>         <C>
Original capital contributions      181,808        $ 1       $ --     $45,452     $45,453

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at December 31, 2002             181,300       $ (2)      $ (73)    $ 443       $ 368

Net loss for the nine months
   ended September 30, 2003              --          --         --        (45)        (45)

Partners' (deficiency) capital
   at September 30, 2003            181,300       $ (2)      $ (73)    $ 398       $ 323

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Nine Months Ended
                                                                   September 30,
                                                                 2003         2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>
  Net (loss) income                                              $ (45)       $ 50
  Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net
   cash provided by operating activities:
   Depreciation                                                     356          337
   Amortization of loan costs                                         4            5
   Casualty gain                                                     --          (18)
  Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                       (5)          23
      Other assets                                                  (28)         (11)
      Accounts payable                                              (11)         (56)
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                            22           10
      Accrued property taxes                                        (24)         (25)
      Other liabilities                                              28           76
      Due to affiliates                                              --           26
         Net cash provided by operating activities                  297          417

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (119)        (261)
  Insurance proceeds received                                        --           19
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (119)        (242)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                (115)        (106)
  Advances from affiliates                                           --           98
  Payments on advances from affiliates                               --         (237)
         Net cash used in financing activities                     (115)        (245)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                 63          (70)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    178          240
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                       $ 241        $ 170

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                         $ 335        $ 314


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying  unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements of Consolidated
Capital  Properties VI (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial  statements.  In the opinion of ConCap  Equities,  Inc.  ("CEI" or the
"General  Partner"),  all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating
results  for the  three  and nine  months  ended  September  30,  2003,  are not
necessarily  indicative  of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year
ending  December 31, 2003. For further  information,  refer to the  consolidated
financial  statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2002.  The General
Partner  is  an  affiliate  of  Apartment   Investment  and  Management  Company
("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.

Note B - Related Party Transactions

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership.

Affiliates of the General  Partner are entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts
from  the  Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$72,000  and  $87,000 for the nine  months  ended  September  30, 2003 and 2002,
respectively, which is included in operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of  the  General  Partner  earned  reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $36,000 and $89,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002,  respectively,  which is included
in general and administrative  expenses and investment  properties.  Included in
the  amount  for the nine  months  ended  September  30,  2003 and 2002 are fees
related to  construction  management  services  provided by an  affiliate of the
General  Partner  of  approximately  $3,000  and  $17,000,   respectively.   The
construction  management  service fees are  calculated  based on a percentage of
current year additions to the investment properties. Approximately $8,000 of the
fees  remained  unpaid  as of  September  30,  2003  and are  included  in other
liabilities.

The Partnership Agreement also provides for a special management fee equal to 9%
of the total  distributions  made from operations to the Limited  Partners to be
paid  to  the  General  Partner  for  executive  and  administrative  management
services. No such fee was earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 or
2002.

The  Partnership  had  advances  from an  affiliate  of the  General  Partner of
approximately  $139,000 as of December  31,  2001.  During the nine months ended
September  30,  2002,  the  Partnership  received  additional  advances  from an
affiliate  of the  General  Partner of  approximately  $98,000.  During the nine
months  ended  September  30,  2002,   these  advances  were  repaid   including
approximately $5,000 in accrued interest. Interest was charged at the prime rate
plus 2% and amounted to approximately $4,000 for the nine months ended September
30, 2002.  There were no loans from the General  Partner or associated  interest
expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2003.

The  Partnership  insures its  property up to certain  limits  through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability.  The Partnership  insures its property above the AIMCO limits through
insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the General
Partner.  During  the  nine  months  ended  September  30,  2003 and  2002,  the
Partnership  was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates  approximately  $21,000 and
$25,000,  respectively,  for insurance  coverage and fees associated with policy
claims administration.

Note C - Casualty Gain

The casualty gain in 2002 is related to a fire at the property in August 2001. A
gain of approximately  $43,000 was recognized during the year ended December 31,
2001. An additional gain of approximately $18,000 was recognized during the nine
months  ended  September  30,  2002 due to the receipt of  additional  insurance
proceeds  of  approximately   $19,000,  net  of  the  write  off  of  additional
undepreciated property improvements and replacements of approximately $1,000.

Note D - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purported to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships  (including the Partnership) that are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time,  affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief,  including judicial
dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a
complaint (the "Heller  action") was filed against the same  defendants that are
named in the Nuanes action,  captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or
about August 6, 2001,  plaintiffs  filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller
action was brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserted claims for,
among other things,  breach of fiduciary duty, unfair  competition,  conversion,
unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make at least
one round of tender offers to purchase all of the  partnership  interests in the
Partnerships within one year of final approval, if it is granted, and to provide
partners  with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The
proposed  settlement  also provided for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs
which the General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
filed an appeal  seeking  to vacate  and/or  reverse  the  order  approving  the
settlement and entering judgment thereto.  The General Partner intends to file a
respondent's  brief in support of the order  approving  settlement  and entering
judgment thereto.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs,  associated with these cases will be material
to the Partnership's overall operations.

On August 8, 2003 AIMCO  Properties  L.P., an affiliate of the General  Partner,
was served with a Complaint in the United  States  District  Court,  District of
Columbia alleging that AIMCO Properties L.P.  willfully  violated the Fair Labor
Standards  Act (FLSA) by failing to pay  maintenance  workers  overtime  for all
hours  worked  in  excess  of forty  per  week.  The  Complaint  is  styled as a
Collective  Action  under  the FLSA and seeks to  certify  state  subclasses  in
California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs
contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. failed to compensate  maintenance workers for
time  that they were  required  to be  "on-call".  Additionally,  the  Complaint
alleges AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  failed to comply with the FLSA in  compensating
maintenance  workers  for time that they  worked in  responding  to a call while
"on-call".  The  Complaint  also  attempts  to certify a subclass  for  salaried
service  directors who are challenging  their  classification as exempt from the
overtime  provisions of the FLSA.  AIMCO  Properties L.P. has filed an answer to
the Complaint denying the substantive  allegations.  Although the outcome of any
litigation is uncertain,  in the opinion of the General  Partner the claims will
not result in any material liability to the Partnership.

The  Partnership  is unaware  of any other  pending  or  outstanding  litigation
matters  involving  it or its  investment  properties  that are not of a routine
nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

ITEM 2.     Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending   claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes  and   possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment property consists of one apartment complex, Colony
of Springdale Apartments, located in Springdale, Ohio. The average occupancy for
the nine month  periods  ended  September  30,  2003 and 2002,  was 91% and 94%,
respectively.  The decrease in occupancy at Colony of  Springdale  Apartments is
due to competitive market conditions and unfavorable  economic conditions in the
local market area.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's  net loss for the nine months  ended  September  30, 2003 was
approximately  $45,000 compared to net income of  approximately  $50,000 for the
corresponding  period in 2002. The  Partnership's  net loss for the three months
ended  September 30, 2003 was  approximately  $10,000  compared to net income of
approximately $16,000 for the corresponding period in 2002. Net income decreased
for the three and nine months ended  September  30, 2003 as compared to the same
period in 2002 as a result of a decrease  in total  revenues  and an increase in
total expenses.

The decrease in total  revenues for the nine months ended  September 30, 2003 is
attributable  to a  decrease  in  rental  revenue  partially  offset by a slight
increase in other income and a casualty gain  recognized  during the nine months
ended  September 30, 2002 (as discussed  below).  The decrease in total revenues
for the three months ended  September 30, 2003 is  attributable to a decrease in
rental  income and other  income.  Rental  revenue  decreased  for both  periods
primarily due to a decrease in occupancy at Colony of Springdale  Apartments (as
discussed above). Other income increased for the nine months ended September 30,
2003 due to an  increase  in late  charges and lease  cancellation  fees.  Other
income  decreased  during the three  months  ended  September  30, 2003 due to a
decrease in net utility  reimbursements  and late charges partially offset by an
increase in laundry income and lease cancellation fees.

The casualty gain in 2002 is related to a fire at the property in August 2001. A
gain of approximately  $43,000 was recognized during the year ended December 31,
2001. An additional gain of approximately $18,000 was recognized during the nine
months  ended  September  30,  2002 due to the receipt of  additional  insurance
proceeds  of  approximately   $19,000,  net  of  the  write  off  of  additional
undepreciated property improvements and replacements of approximately $1,000. No
such gains were recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2003.

Total expenses  increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003
primarily due to increases in operating, depreciation, and property tax expenses
partially  offset by a decrease  in  interest  and  general  and  administrative
expenses.  Operating  expenses  increased  due to increases in  maintenance  and
property expenses partially offset by a decrease in management fees. Maintenance
expenses  increased  primarily  due to increases  in contract  services and snow
removal expenses at the  Partnership's  property.  Property  expenses  increased
primarily due to an increase in utility expenses  partially offset by a decrease
in employee  salaries and related benefits and reduced  commissions and bonuses.
Management fees decreased due to decreased rental revenues at the  Partnership's
property.  Depreciation  expense  increased  due to  property  improvements  and
replacements  completed  during the twelve month period ended September 30, 2003
that  are now  being  depreciated.  Property  tax  expense  increased  due to an
increase in the assessed value of the Partnership's  property.  Interest expense
decreased due to the declining of mortgage  principal as a result of the payment
of scheduled mortgage payments.

General  and  administrative  expenses  decreased  for the three and nine months
ended  September  30, 2003  primarily  due to a decrease in the cost of services
included in the  management  reimbursements  to the  General  Partner as allowed
under the  Partnership  Agreement.  Also included in general and  administrative
expenses at  September  30, 2003 are costs  associated  with the  quarterly  and
annual  communications  with  investors and  regulatory  agencies and the annual
audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner
monitors the rental market environment of its investment  property to assess the
feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and
protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the
General  Partner  attempts  to  protect  the  Partnership  from  the  burden  of
inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a
high  overall  occupancy  level.  However,  the  General  Partner may use rental
concessions and rental rate reductions to offset  softening  market  conditions,
accordingly,  there is no  guarantee  that the General  Partner  will be able to
sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  September  30,  2003,  the  Partnership  had cash and  cash  equivalents  of
approximately $241,000 compared to approximately $170,000 at September 30, 2002.
Cash and cash equivalents  increased by approximately $63,000 since December 31,
2002 due to  approximately  $297,000 of cash  provided by  operating  activities
partially  offset  by  approximately  $119,000  and  $115,000  of  cash  used in
investing and financing activities.  Cash used in investing activities consisted
of property  improvements and  replacements.  Cash used in financing  activities
consisted of principal  payments made on the mortgage  indebtedness  encumbering
the Partnership's property. The Partnership invests its working capital reserves
in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal,  state,
and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  General  Partner  monitors
developments in the area of legal and regulatory  compliance and is studying new
federal laws,  including the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002  mandates  or suggests  additional  compliance  measures  with regard to
governance,  disclosure,  audit and other areas. In light of these changes,  the
Partnership  expects that it will incur higher  expenses  related to compliance,
including increased legal and audit fees. Capital  improvements  planned for the
Partnership's property are discussed below.

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2003,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately   $119,000  of  capital   expenditures  at  Colony  of  Springdale
Apartments,  consisting  primarily  of  structural  improvements,  parking  area
improvements,  roofing, and floor covering replacements. These improvements were
funded  from  operating  cash  flow.  The  Partnership   evaluates  the  capital
improvement  needs of the  property  during  the year and  currently  expects to
complete  an  additional  $26,000  in  capital  improvements  during  2003.  The
additional  capital  improvements  will  consist  of  floor  covering,  HVAC and
appliance  replacements.  Additional  improvements  may be  considered  and will
depend on the physical condition of the property as well as the anticipated cash
flow generated by the property and Partnership reserves.

The  Partnership's  assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term  needs
(exclusive  of  capital   improvements)   of  the   Partnership.   The  mortgage
indebtedness  encumbering the Partnership's property of approximately $5,079,000
matures  December 1, 2019 at which time the  mortgage is  scheduled  to be fully
amortized.

The  Partnership  did not make any  distributions  during the nine months  ended
September 30, 2003 and 2002. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels
of net cash generated from operations, the availability of cash reserves and the
timing of the debt maturity, refinancing and/or property sale. The Partnership's
cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis.  There can be no
assurance that the Partnership  will generate  sufficient funds from operations,
after required  capital  expenditures,  to permit  distributions to its partners
during the remainder of 2003 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 91,747 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 50.61% of the outstanding Units at
September  30,  2003. A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender
offers  made by  AIMCO  or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its
affiliates will acquire  additional  Units in exchange for cash or a combination
of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO,
either through private  purchases or tender offers.  Pursuant to the Partnership
Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take
action with  respect to a variety of matters that  include,  but are not limited
to,  voting on certain  amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove  the  General  Partner.  As a result  of its  ownership  of 50.61% of the
outstanding  Units,  AIMCO and its  affiliates  are in a position to control all
voting decisions with respect to the  Partnership.  Although the General Partner
owes fiduciary duties to the limited  partners of the  Partnership,  the General
Partner  also  owes  fiduciary  duties  to AIMCO as its sole  stockholder.  As a
result,  the  duties  of  the  General  Partner,  as  general  partner,  to  the
Partnership  and its limited  partners may come into conflict with the duties of
the General Partner to AIMCO, as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The  investment  property is recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's  investment  property.  These factors include, but are not limited
to,  changes  in the  national,  regional  and  local  economic  climate;  local
conditions,  such as an oversupply of multifamily  properties;  competition from
other available  multifamily property owners and changes in market rental rates.
Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnership's
assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized  monthly as it is earned and
the Partnership  fully reserves all  outstanding  balances over thirty days. The
Partnership will offer rental concessions during  particularly slow months or in
response to heavy  competition  from other  similar  complexes in the area.  Any
concessions  given at the inception of the lease are amortized  over the life of
the lease.

ITEM 3.     Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purported to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships  (including the Partnership) that are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time,  affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief,  including judicial
dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a
complaint (the "Heller  action") was filed against the same  defendants that are
named in the Nuanes action,  captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or
about August 6, 2001,  plaintiffs  filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller
action was brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserted claims for,
among other things,  breach of fiduciary duty, unfair  competition,  conversion,
unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the General Partner has also agreed to make at least
one round of tender offers to purchase all of the  partnership  interests in the
Partnerships within one year of final approval, if it is granted, and to provide
partners  with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The
proposed  settlement  also provided for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs
which the General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
filed an appeal  seeking  to vacate  and/or  reverse  the  order  approving  the
settlement and entering judgment thereto.  The General Partner intends to file a
respondent's  brief in support of the order  approving  settlement  and entering
judgment thereto.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any costs to the  Partnership,
whether legal or settlement costs,  associated with these cases will be material
to the Partnership's overall operations.

On August 8, 2003 AIMCO  Properties  L.P., an affiliate of the General  Partner,
was served with a Complaint in the United  States  District  Court,  District of
Columbia alleging that AIMCO Properties L.P.  willfully  violated the Fair Labor
Standards  Act (FLSA) by failing to pay  maintenance  workers  overtime  for all
hours  worked  in  excess  of forty  per  week.  The  Complaint  is  styled as a
Collective  Action  under  the FLSA and seeks to  certify  state  subclasses  in
California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs
contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. failed to compensate  maintenance workers for
time  that they were  required  to be  "on-call".  Additionally,  the  Complaint
alleges AIMCO  Properties  L.P.  failed to comply with the FLSA in  compensating
maintenance  workers  for time that they  worked in  responding  to a call while
"on-call".  The  Complaint  also  attempts  to certify a subclass  for  salaried
service  directors who are challenging  their  classification as exempt from the
overtime  provisions of the FLSA.  AIMCO  Properties L.P. has filed an answer to
the Complaint denying the substantive  allegations.  Although the outcome of any
litigation is uncertain,  in the opinion of the General  Partner the claims will
not result in any material liability to the Partnership.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

      a) Exhibits:

            3.1   Certificate of Limited Partnership,  incorporated by reference
                  to the Registration  Statement of Registrant filed October 22,
                  1984, as amended to date.

            3.2   Agreement of Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to
                  the  Registration  Statement of  Registrant  filed October 22,
                  1984, as amended to date.

            31.1  Certification   of  equivalent  of  Chief  Executive   Officer
                  pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
                  as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
                  of 2002.

            31.2  Certification   of  equivalent  of  Chief  Financial   Officer
                  pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
                  as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
                  of 2002.

            32.1  Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as Adopted
                  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      b) Reports on Form 8-K:

            None filed during the quarter ended September 30, 2003.




<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI


                                    By:   CONCAP EQUITIES, INC.
                                          General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                          Paul J. McAuliffe
                                          Executive Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                                    Date: November 13, 2003


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Patrick J. Foye, certify that:


1.    I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Consolidated
      Capital Properties VI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2003




                                    /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                 Patrick J. Foye
                                Executive  Vice  President  of ConCap  Equities,
                                Inc.,  equivalent of the chief executive officer
                                of the Partnership


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Paul J. McAuliffe, certify that:


1.    I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Consolidated
      Capital Properties VI;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2003

                                    /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                Paul J. McAuliffe
                                Executive  Vice  President  and Chief  Financial
                                Officer of ConCap Equities,  Inc., equivalent of
                                the chief financial officer of the Partnership



<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                   Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated  Capital
Properties VI (the "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  Patrick  J. Foye,  as the  equivalent  of the chief  executive
officer of the  Partnership,  and Paul J.  McAuliffe,  as the  equivalent of the
chief financial officer of the Partnership,  each hereby certifies,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Name:  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Date:  November 13, 2003


                                           /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Name:  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Date:  November 13, 2003



This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.