alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133433(55)(56)(57) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, AMANDA JEAN ODOM, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133433 

 COA: 270501 
 Wayne CC: 05-503671-NI

WAYNE COUNTY and CITY OF DETROIT, 

Defendants, 

and 

CHRISTINE KELLY,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file briefs amicus curiae are 

GRANTED. The motion for reconsideration of this Court’s January 11, 2008 order is 

considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE our order dated January 11, 2008. On 

reconsideration, the application for leave to appeal the February 1, 2007 judgment of the 

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among 

the issues to be briefed: (1) what is the proper interpretation of MCL 691.1407(3) 

(“[MCL 691.1407(2)] does not alter the law of intentional torts as it existed before July 7, 

1986.”); (2) can intentional torts claims be brought under MCL 691.1407(2); and (3) for 

an intentional tort claim, what must a plaintiff plead to avoid governmental immunity? 

The Michigan Municipal League, the Michigan Municipal League Liability & 

Property Pool, the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office, and the Michigan Association of 

Police Organizations are invited to file additional briefs amicus curiae. The Attorney 

General is invited to file a brief amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the 

determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to 

file briefs amicus curiae. 

d0422 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 25, 2008 

Clerk
9.206-3 Competition.

(a) Presolicitation. If a qualification requirement applies to an acquisition, the contracting officer

shall review the applicable QPL, QML, or QBL or other identification of those sources which have

met the requirement before issuing a solicitation to ascertain whether the number of sources is

adequate for competition. (See 9.204(a) for duties of the agency activity responsible for

establishment of the qualification requirement.) If the number of sources is inadequate, the

contracting officer shall request the agency activity which established the requirement to-

(1) Indicate the anticipated date on which any sources presently undergoing evaluation will have

demonstrated their abilities to meet the qualification requirement so that the solicitation could be

rescheduled to allow as many additional sources as possible to qualify; or

(2) Indicate whether a means other than the qualification requirement is feasible for testing or

demonstrating quality assurance.

(b) Post solicitation. The contracting officer shall submit to the agency activity which established the

qualification requirement the names and addresses of concerns which expressed interest in the

acquisition but are not included on the applicable QPL, QML, or QBL or identified as meeting the

qualification requirement. The activity will then assist interested concerns in meeting the standards

specified for qualification (see 9.202(a)(2) and (4)).

Parent topic: 9.206 Acquisitions subject to qualification requirements.
# ' ·



# ~======== **==== ~~~~~~==~**  **~** 2 Specifications

Aircraft Supported 

### 8et:tery DJI5200mAh Li·Po Ba tt ery 

### W eight 

### re.twry & P ropellera 

### included) 1 242g H overing Acancy(Raedyt.o Fly) Vertical: O.Sm: Hor i z

o nt

al : 25m 

### tiax Yaw A ngular 

### Velocity 200'/s Max iitt.ble 

### Angle 35' Max 

### Aacant 

## I Ouatnt Speed Ascent: 6m/s:

**esce~ t:**  

### 3m/s Max F light Sf)Hd 1 5m/ s ( N ot Re comme nded) 

### Diag ona l mo tor-motor distanc:e 350 mm 

## Gimbal Working Current 

### Control Accurecy 

### Controlla ble 

### Range Maximum Angular 

### Speed 

## Camera Opentt l ng Environment T empenrture 

### Sensor Size Effective P ixels 

### Raeolutlon 

### HD R oco rding R

ecordi ng FOV 

## Remote Controller Openttlng 

### Frequency Cotnm uniaotion Distance

**ope<~** 

### ..-..) Receiver Sensitivity

**(l R)**  

### T,..namitting Power (EIRP) W orldng

**Cu ,..**  **nt/Vo~e** 

### Ba

ttory 

# 1-·------

Range Extender 

# l O penting 

### Frequency muniaotlon Distance

**(ope<~** 

### orea) 

### nom itting p_., 

### er

**Cor~~~~mpt on** 

o20L<l OJ L AI Rights R•M"'ed. 

## 72 1 Sta t ic : 7 50mA: Dynam i c : 9 00mA 

# to . o3· P ' t ch , 

### -90°
- 

# o• P itch: 

### 90°/ s
O"C· 4 0"C 

### 1/2.3" 1 4 

### Mega pixel s 

### 4384 X 3288 1 080p30 /108 0 1

60 

### 110' / 85 '

5
. 728 GHz - 5.85 GH t Cf

**Co p~**  **ance .**  400m: F CC Compfi a nce: 800m ·93dBm C E C omp li anc<'
. ?Sm W : FCC C o m p liance : lOOmW 80mA@6V 

### 4 AA B4 tt e rlos



# - - - --·- - ----------
24 1 ?MH z • 2462MHz 500m -7 00 m 2 0dBm 

## 2W
2006-0034.

#### Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Perris Bros., Inc.

Summit App. Nos. 22581, 22604, 22605, 22606, 22607, 22608, 22609, 22610, 22611, 22612, 22613, 22614, 22615, 22616, 22617, 22618, and 22619, 2005-Ohio-6221. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2005-2134, *Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Power Eng. Group, Inc.,*Summit App. Nos. 22475, 22476, 22477, 22478, 22485, 22486, 22487, 22488, 22489, 22497, 22499, 22506, and 22513, 163 Ohio App.3d 522, 2005-Ohio-5113; and briefing schedule stayed.

Resnicic, J., dissents.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Khutsana Kenya Davis v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00762

- CR

Trial court case number: 1323141

Trial court: 262nd District Court of Harris County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court for the trial court to appoint

counsel to represent appellant, Khutsana Kenya Davis, on appeal. On May 2, 2014, the

trial court clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record showing that the trial court appointed

J. Sidney Crowley to represent Davis. Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the

Court’s active docket.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed by no later than May 2 7, 2014. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(a).

Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the filing of

appellant’s brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 15, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 3:20cr40/MCR

SHELLEY E. JOHNSON

 /

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there has been no timely objections, and subject to this Court’s

consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(3), the plea of

guilty of the Defendant, SHELLEY E. JOHNSON, to Counts One, Two, Three, Four,

Five, Six, Seven, Ten, Eleven, and Twelve of the Indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. 

All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 3rd day of December 2020.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00040-MCR Document 172 Filed 12/03/20 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 5:92cr5006/LAC 

5:06cv63/LAC/MD

GLENN E. LOVETT

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on March 21, 2006, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after

reviewing objections to the Recommendation, the Recommendation is adopted as

the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

The motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2255 (doc. 178) is summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3).

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of April, 2006.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:92-cr-05006-LC-MD Document 181 Filed 04/04/06 Page 1 of 1
| **Shawnee County, Kansas**                            |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
| **Register of Deeds**                                 |
| **Marilyn L. Nichols**                                |
| **Book: 4414 Page: 102**                              |
| **Line #:20060026164**                                |
| **Date Recorded: 10/06/2006 03:31:00.787 PM**

  |

 

 

 

| Lawyers Title of Topeka, Inc. |
|-------------------------------|
| 5715 SW 21st St PO box 4046   |
| Topeka, KS 66604              |
| 7707                          |

 

 

Prepared by, and after recording

Return to:

Moss & Barnett (EHK)

A Professional Association

4800 Wells Fargo Center

90 South Seventh Street

Minneapolis, MN 55402

 

FHLMC Loan No. 940972379

 

**ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INSTRUMENT**

**(Revision Date 11-01-2000)**

 

FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, NorthMarq Capital, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota (the “Assignor”), having its principal office at 3500 American Boulevard West, Suite 500, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431, hereby assigns, grants, sells and transfers to the FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United States (the “Assignee”), having its principal place of business at 8200 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, Virginia 22 102, and the Assignee’s successors, transferees and assigns forever, all of the right, title and interest of the Assignor in and to the Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement dated/effective as of October 4, 2006, entered into by Cascade Joint Venture, L.P., aKansas limited partnership (the “Borrower “) for the benefit of the Assignor, securing an indebtedness of the Borrower to the Assignor in the principal amount of $2,540,000.00 and recorded in the land records of Shawnee County, recorded immediately prior hereto at 4414-100 (the “Instrument”), which indebtedness is secured by the property described in Exhibit A, attached to this Assignment and incorporated into it by this reference.

 

Together with the note or other obligation described in the Instrument and all obligations secured by the Instrument now or in the future.

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1



I, Robert Escobio, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp. (the registrant);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

[Paragraph omitted pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934]

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2008

| |        |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | By:    | /s/ ROBERT ESOCBIO     
| | Name:  | Robert Escobio         
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

LARRY PUGH,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-183-TKW/MJF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 29) and Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 33). The Court 

reviewed the issues raised in the objections de novo as required by 28 U.S.C. 

§636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), and based on that review, the Court agrees 

with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed.

If, as Plaintiff claims in his objections “[t]he BOP’s ultimate failure is not that 

it failed to prescribe Prilosec but that it stopped prescribing Ranitidine and failed to 

prescribe any medication to treat [Plaintiff’s] chronic GERD condition,” Doc. 33, at 

6 (emphasis in original), that “failure” occurred in July 2014, which means that 

Plaintiff’s cause of action likely accrued even earlier than the magistrate judge 

determined. Either way, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s conclusion

that the statute of limitations bars Plaintiff’s medical malpractice claim under the 

Case 5:20-cv-00183-TKW-MJF Document 36 Filed 08/16/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Federal Tort Claim Act. With respect to the other issues discussed in the Report and 

Recommendation, Plaintiff does not contest the magistrate judge’s determination 

that there is no legal basis for Plaintiff to recover his expenditures for medications 

and he disclaims any intent to plead a deliberate indifference claim under the Eighth 

Amendment or a claim under the Freedom of Information Act. Id. at 11, 16.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 14) is GRANTED, and this case 

is DISMISSED with prejudice.

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close 

the case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of August, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00183-TKW-MJF Document 36 Filed 08/16/21 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000755465
<NAME>                                         SANDATA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     $

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-29-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         197,870
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,773,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                   603,263
<INVENTORY>                                    32,728
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,168,958
<PP&E>                                         17,922,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                 9,650,389
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,377,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,139,611
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,481
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,613,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,377,457
<SALES>                                        13,006,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,426,026
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13,036,404
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             176,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                213,320
<INCOME-TAX>                                   87,461
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            125,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   125,859
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .05



</TABLE>
PSD Application Documents 

MCU Facility PSD Permit 

Amendment
§ 3560.562 Loan and grant limits. ( a ) *Determining the security value.* The requirements established under § 3560.63(a) apply to off-farm labor housing loans.
( b ) *Maximum amount of loan.* The requirements established in § 3560.63(c)(1) and (2), regarding borrower equity contribution apply to all applications for off-farm labor housing loans. (For applicants eligible under § 3560.555(a)(2), the amount of Agency financing for the housing will not exceed 95 percent of the total development cost or 95 percent of the security value available for the Agency loan, whichever is lower.) In determining the amount of the loan, the Agency will also review the capacity of the applicant to amortize such loan, considering any rental assistance provided for use in the housing, and any rents anticipated to be paid by farmworkers expected to occupy the housing.
( c ) *Maximum amount of grant.* The amount of any off-farm labor housing grant must not exceed the lesser of: ( 1 ) Ninety percent of the total development cost, or
( 2 ) That portion of the total development cost which exceeds the sum of any amount provided by the applicant from their own resources plus the amount of any loans approved for the applicant, considering the capacity of the applicant to amortize the loan.
**NEITHER THIS WARRANT NOR ANY OF THE SECURITIES ISSUABLE UPON EXERCISE HEREOF HAVE BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE "ACT"), OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAW.  THE WARRANTS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE AND THE SECURITIES ISSUABLE UPON EXERCISE HEREOF MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED, SOLD, ASSIGNED, EXCHANGED, MORTGAGED, PLEDGED, HYPOTHECATED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF OR ENCUMBERED WITHOUT COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF, AND ARE OTHERWISE RESTRICTED BY THE PROVISIONS OF, THE ACT, THE RULES AND REGULATIONS THEREUNDER AND THIS WARRANT.**

Warrant No. 1

**WARRANT**

**TO PURCHASE 626,002 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK**

**(SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENT)**

**OF**

**SKYTERRA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.**

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT BOEING SATELLITE SYSTEMS INC. (“Boeing”), or its registered assigns, is entitled, at any time prior to the Expiration Date (such term, and certain other capitalized terms used herein being hereinafter defined), to purchase from SKYTERRA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), 626,002 shares of Voting Common Stock of the Company at a purchase price of $10.00 per share (the initial “Exercise Price”). The amount and kind of securities obtainable pursuant to the rights granted hereunder and the Exercise Price are subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 4 hereof.

| **1.** | **DEFINITIONS** |
|--------|-----------------|

As used in this Warrant, the following terms have the respective meanings set forth below:

“Additional Construction Deferral” shall have the meaning given to such term in Contract #MSV-ATC-01, dated as of January 9, 2006, between Boeing and the Company, as amended through the date hereof.

“Affiliate” of any Person shall mean any other Person which directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with such Person.  The term “control” (including the terms “controlled by” and “under common control with”) as used with respect to any Person shall mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.

 

 

 

----
Exhibit
      23.1








CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
      have
      issued our report dated December 21, 2007, accompanying the
      consoli­dated finan­cial statements and schedule of APA Enterprises,
      Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
      period ended September 30, 2007 (which report expressed an unqualified
      opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of
      Financial Accounting Standard Board Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based
      Payment).  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
      of said report in the Registration State­ments of APA Enterprises, Inc. on
      Forms S-8 (File No. 333-74214, effective November 30, 2001; File No.
      333-44500, effective August 25, 2000; File No. 333-44488, effective
      August 25, 2000; File No. 333-44486, effective August 25, 2000; and
      File No. 333-136828, effective August 23, 2006).








/s/GRANT
      THORNTON LLP








Minneapolis,
      Minnesota


December
      21, 2007