CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

### SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST ***TO BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICTAND RETURNED TOARB ~ All rules submitted to the EPA as State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions must be supported by certain information and documentation forthe rule packages to be deemed complete for review bythe EPA. Rules will not be evaluated for approvability by the EPA unless the submittal packages are complete. To 

### assist you in determining that all necessary materials are included in rules packages sentthe ARB forsubmittal to the EPA, please fill outthe following form and include itwith the rule packageyou send ARB. SeetheARB’s Guidelines on the Implementation ofthe EPA’s Draft SIP Completeness Policy, October 1989, fora more detailed explanation than is provided here. District South CoastAQMD Rule No. 1610 DateAmended May9, 1997 RuleTitle Old-Vehicle Scrapping

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

Not Attached Attached N/A (X) 

### () () COMPLETE COPY OF THE RULE: Provide an unmarked copy ofthe entire rule as adopted oramended byyour District Board. (X) 

### () () UNDERLINE AND STRIKEOUT COPY OF THE RULE: If an amended rule, provide a complete copy of the rule indicating in underline and strikeout format all languagewhich has been added, deleted, orchanged sincethe rule was last adopted oramended. (X) 

### () 0 COMPLETE COPY OF THE REFERENCED RULE(S): For any rule which includes language specifically referencing another rule, a copy ofthat other rule must also be submitted, unless it has already been submitted to EPA as partofa previous SIP submittal. (X) 

### () () PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE: Include a copy ofthe local newspaperclipping certification(s), stating the date of publication, which must be at least30 days before the hearing. As an alternative, include a copy ofthe actual published notice ofthe public hearing as it appeared in the local newspaper(s). In this case, however, enough ofthe newspaper page must be included to showthe date of publication. The notice must specifically identify bytitle and number each rule adopted oramended. (X) 

### () () RESOLUTIONIMINUTE ORDER: Providethe Board Clerkcertified resolution or minute order. This document must include certification that the hearing was held in accordance with the information in the public notice. It must also list the rules thatwere adopted or amended, the date ofthe public hearing, and a statement of compliance with California Health and Safety Code Sections40725-40728 (Administrative ProceduresAct). 

### () () (X) PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES: Submit copies of written public comments made during the notice period and at the public hearing. Also submit anywritten responses prepared bythe Districtstafforpresented tothe District Board atthe public hearing. A summary ofthe public comments and responses is adequate. Ifthere were no comments made during the notice period oratthe hearing, please indicate N/Atothe left.CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

### SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

TECHNICAL MATERIALS

Not Attached Attached NIA 

### (X) 

### () () RULE EVALUATION FORM: See instructions for completing the Rule Evaluation 

### Form and the accompanying sampleform. 

### () () (X) NON-EPA TEST METHOD: Include all test methods referenced in the 

### rule, but not previouslysubmitted to EPA. Provide an explanation ofthe purpose and principle for the test method and include the following supporting technical data: describe the test details (number oftests to be carried out, theirprecision accuracy, and repeatability); on a technical basis, comparethe method with the appropriate EPAIASTM method; explain the technical differences of the 

### two methods and how they affect monitoring of the parameters of interest; explain how the test method affects the implementation and enforcement of the applicable rule; explain the advantages and any potential shortcomingsofthe test method. (X) MODELING SUPPORT: Provide ifappropriate; in general modeling support is

not required for VOC and NOx rules to determine their impacts on ozone levels. Modeling is required where a rule is a relaxation that affects large sources 

### (~ 100 TPY) in an attainment area for SO2, directly emitted PMIO, CO, or NOx (for NO2 purposes). In cases where EPA is concerned with the impact on air quality of rule revisions which relax limits or cause a shift in emission patterns in a nonattainment area, a reference backtothe approved SIP will be sufficient provided the approved SIP used the current EPA modeling guidelines. Ifcurrent EPA modeling guidelineswere not used, then new modeling may be required. (X) 

### () ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS FROM EPA POLICIES: As appropriate, describe special circumstances, i.e., where alternative RACT is used, extended compliance date are included, etc. A completed SIP Approvability Checklist-Enforceability will fulfill this requirement. (X) 

### () ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: Provide any other supporting information concerning developmentofthe rule or rule changes, such asstaffreports.

(ARBFORM

-6/93)