alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Masha Chomski et al., Respondents, v. Alston Cab Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Order entered March 5, 1969, preferring and advancing this personal injury action for trial, unanimously reversed and vacated, on the law and the facts in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements. We derogate in no way from our view, previously expressed, that the Justice at Pretrial Term should act as a catalyst in bringing the parties together to a fair settlement and to that end should evince all reasonable exhortation, guidance and direction, eschewing however undue pressure or any coercive measures, no matter how subtly applied. *(Wolff*v. *Laverne, Inc.,*17 A D 2d 213.) Nor do we question the objective and well-intentioned zeal of the Justice whose order is under review. Nevertheless, mere refusal on the part of defendant’s counsel, or reluctance to accede to the court’s specific view of a settlement should not be followed by judicial lightning. This is so, even when here, the tactics of defendant are open to the reproach of dilatory foot-dragging. Yet, the particular record before us is an insufficient basis to support an affirmative finding of bad faith on the part of defendant’s counsel. *(Binninger*v. *Grillo,*28 A D 2d 1100.) And to permit this disposition to stand would only leave behind a vexatious precedent, be unfair to the general tort litigants who must stand and wait, and borrow trouble of the future. Accordingly, the case should be restored to its original position on the calendar. Concur—Capozzoli, J. P., MeGivern, Markewich, McNally and Steuer, JJ.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp., Inc. (the Corporation) each certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|             |  |     |                        
|------------ |  | --- | -----------------------
|             |  | By: | /s/ Robert Escobio     
|             |  |     | Robert Escobio         
|             |  |     | Chief Executive Officer
|May 15, 2009 |  |     |                        



|             |  |     |                        
|------------ |  | --- | -----------------------
|             |  | By: | /s/ Fernando Fussa     
|             |  |     | Fernando Fussa         
|             |  |     | Chief Financial Officer
|May 15, 2009 |  |     |                        



This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason other than as specifically required by law.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Franklin D. Chu, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Shanghai Century Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

 

|   | • |   | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarters ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | • |   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Date: August 14, 2006

 

|                                                                                                    |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Franklin D. Chu

Franklin D. Chu

Co-Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)

  |
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Sino Gas International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q (“Report”) for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 15, 2011





/s/ Yuchuan LiuYuchuan LiuChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Baoling WangBaoling Wang(Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 6.11

           AGREEMENT TO EXTEND TERM OF SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE, DATED
                 APRIL 17, 1996, BY AND BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND
                            TREVOR AND KATE PHILLIPS

<PAGE>   2

               AGREEMENT TO EXTEND TERM OF SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

         THIS AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT") is made this 17th day of April, 1996 by
and between KCD HOLDINGS INCORPORATED, a Nevada corporation; KCD INCORPORATED, a
California corporation (collectively referred to herein as "Borrower"); and
TREVOR AND KATE PHILLIPS (collectively referred to herein as "Lender").

                               W I T N E S S E T H

         WHEREAS, Borrower has previously executed a Secured Promissory Note
dated October 17, 1995 (the "Note") in favor of Lender;

         WHEREAS, Borrower and Lender desire to extend the term of the Note from
April 17, 1996 to October 17, 1996.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein
contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1. The term of the Note is hereby extended to October 17, 1996 from
April 17, 1996.

         2. All of the remaining terms and conditions of the Note shall remain
in full force and effect and shall not be affected by this Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound,
have executed this Agreement.


                                    KCD HOLDINGS INCORPORATED


                                    By:      
                                             ----------------------------
                                             Bonnie Richards, President

                                    KCD INCORPORATED


                                    By:
                                             ----------------------------
                                             Bonnie Richards, President


                                             ----------------------------
                                             Trevor Phillips


                                             ----------------------------
                                             Kate Phillips
4.1008 Solicitation provision.       Insert the provision at 52.204-22, Alternative Line Item Proposal, in all solicitations.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 4.10 - Uniform Use of Line Items
§ 4280.17 Additional REDL terms. ( a ) The Intermediary is responsible for fully repaying the Zero-Interest Loan to RBS even if the Ultimate Recipient does not repay the Intermediary.
( b ) The Intermediary is responsible for remitting any partial or full payment to RBS at the time the Ultimate Recipient pays the Intermediary.
( c ) Unless deferred pursuant to § 4280.16(b) of this subpart, loan payments to Rural Development under the REDL Program are due monthly.
( d ) If the Intermediary does not have an outstanding loan with RUS, the Intermediary must immediately provide, as security for any REDL loan it receives, a Rural Development-approved irrevocable letter of credit that remains in effect until the loan is repaid.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 4:99cr16-RH/WCS

 4:11cv18-RH/WCS

MARK ANTHONY JONES,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING THE PETITION 

FOR A WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA

This case is before the court on the report and recommendation, ECF No. 

132, and the objections, ECF No. 133. I have reviewed de novo the issues raised 

by the objections. I conclude that the report and recommendation is correct and 

that the petition should be denied. A certificate of appealability may not be 

required on a petition like this—but the petitioner has not met the requirements for 

a certificate, so one will not be issued. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the 

court’s opinion. 
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:99cr16-RH/WCS and 4:11cv18-RH/WCS

2. The petition for writ of audita querela, ECF No. 125, is DENIED. 

3. Leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED.

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

5. The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on September 22, 2011.

Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
Exhibit 32



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



In connection with the Report of Material Sciences Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald L. Stewart, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





November 24, 2004By:

/s/ Ronald L. StewartRonald L. StewartPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director




In connection with the Report,
I, Jeffrey J. Siemers, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



November 24, 2004By:

/s/ Jeffrey J. SiemersJeffrey J. SiemersVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary




34
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2517 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2517

        To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chlorobenzaldehyde.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2006

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chlorobenzaldehyde.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-CHLOROBENZALDEHYDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.10.72      4-                  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Chlorobenzaldehyd                                                  31/2009
                         e (CAS No. 104-88-
                         1) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2913.00.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2591 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2591

To amend certain provisions of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 
                                 2012.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2013

    Mr. Grimm (for himself, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
    DeFazio, Mr. Hanna, Mr. Bishop of New York, Mr. Roskam, and Mr. 
   Burgess) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend certain provisions of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 
                                 2012.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROLLOVER OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED IN AIRLINE CARRIER BANKRUPTCY.

    (a) Extension of Time To File Claim for Refund.--Section 1106(a)(3) 
of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (26 U.S.C. 408 note) is 
amended by striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2015''.
    (b) Definitions and Special Rules.--Section 1106(c) of such Act is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(A)(i) by inserting ``or filed on 
        November 29, 2011,'' after ``2007,''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)(B)--
                    (A) by striking ``terminated or'' and inserting 
                ``terminated,''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, or was frozen effective 
                November 1, 2012'' after ``Pension Protection Act of 
                2006''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 4:02-cr-00014-SPM   Document 4   Filed 12/11/07   Page 1 of 1
Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF Document 6 Filed 09/22/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF Document 6 Filed 09/22/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF Document 6 Filed 09/22/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF Document 6 Filed 09/22/20 Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 

31.1 

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, Scott W. Absher, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-QSB of EntreMetrix Corporation (the "Company") for thequarterly period ending September 30, 2004.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofcircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by the quarterly report; and 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterlyreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periodspresented in the quarterly report. 

 

4. The registrant's other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) forthe Company and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure		controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and		procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material		information relating to the Company, including its consolidated		subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,		particularly during the period in which the quarterly report is being		prepared; 

b) evaluated the		effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and		presented in the quarterly report our conclusions about the		effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end		of the period covered by the quarterly report based on such evaluation;		and 

c) disclosed in the quarterly		report any change in the Company's internal control over financial		reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter		that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially		affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;

 

5. The registrant's other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the auditcommittee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions); 

 

a) all significant		deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could		adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and		report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any		material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not		material, that involves management or other employees who have a		significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial		reporting. 

 

 

 

| Dated: November 15, 2004   | By: /s/Scott W. Absher     |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                            | Scott W. Absher, President |
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



               We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
          registration statements of Sepragen Corporation on Form S-8 (File
          Nos. 33-95182 and 333-11903) of our report, which includes an
          explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue
          as a going concern, dated February 28,  1997, on our audits of
          the financial statements of Sepragen Corporation as of December
          31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years then ended, which report is
          included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.










          /s/Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
          COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
          San Francisco, California
          April 4, 1997
#### § 4280.100 OMB control number.

The information collection requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and have been assigned OMB control number 0575-0035. A person is not required to respond to this collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
[No. 9234.

Department Two.

January 23, 1911.]

#### A. F. Nelson, *Respondent,*v. Western Steel Corporation, Appellant.1

Damages — Personal Injuries — Excessive Verdict. A verdict for ■ $8,000 for injuries to a coal miner caused by an explosion, reduced by the trial judge to $6,000, will not be held excessive on appeal, where in addition- to great pain and suffering, loss of time, and temporary disability, the plaintiff was marred and disfigured for life.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Shackleford, J., entered July 7, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee through an explosion of gas in a coal mine.

Affirmed.

*Lyter Sf Folsom,*for appellant.

*Govnor Teats, Hugo Metzler,*and *Leo Teats,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 112 Pac. 924.

Rudkin, J.

The injuries for which a recovery was here sought arose out of the same accident as those involved in the case of *Mrozevich v. Western Steel Corporation, ante*p. 668, 112 Pac. 925. In this case, however, liability on the part of the defendant company was admitted, the amount of damages was the only question submitted to the jury, and the claim that excessive damages were allowed, under the influence of passion and prejudice, is the only question presented to this court. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $8,000, but the court below refused a new trial only upon condition that the plaintiff remit the sum of $2,000 from the verdict. The remission was made as directed, and from a judgment on the verdict as reduced, this appeal is prosecuted.

The pain and suffering endured by respondent in this case and the disfigurement of his person do not differ materially *673from those present in the case cited, but here there was no •evidence of permanent disability, unless the jury might infer such disability from the condition of the respondent at the time of the trial and from his appearance on the witness stand. It must be conceded that the recovery in this case was liberal, even as reduced by order of the trial court, but so much depends upon the physical appearance of the respondent, who appeared before the trial judge and jury, that we do not feel warranted in overriding their judgment in the matter of damages. Aside from the pain and suffering, loss •of time and at least temporary disability, the respondent must *go*through life marred and disfigured, deprived in a large measure of the comfort and companionship of others, an object of pity and abhorrence to his fellowmen, and an object of ridicule to the thoughtless and unfeeling. *Gray v. Washington Water Power Co.,*30 Wash. 665, 71 Pac. 206.

Under all the circumstances, therefore, we do not feel •called upon to further reduce a verdict which has already been 'reduced by the trial court, nor do we feel that we would be justified in so doing. Finding no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Dunbar, C. J., Chadwick, Crow, and Morris, JJ., concur.