alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRobust controller designs for second-order dynamic system: A virtual passive approachA robust controller design is presented for second-order dynamic systems. The controller is model-independent and itself is a virtual second-order dynamic system. Conditions on actuator and sensor placements are identified for controller designs that guarantee overall closed-loop stability. The dynamic controller can be viewed as a virtual passive damping system that serves to stabilize the actual dynamic system. The control gains are interpreted as virtual mass, spring, and dashpot elements that play the same roles as actual physical elements in stability analysis. Position, velocity, and acceleration feedback are considered. Simple examples are provided to illustrate the physical meaning of this controller design.Document ID19900016053Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsJuang, Jer-Nan*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Phan, Minh*(National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council Washington, DC., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1990Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102666NAS 1.15:102666Accession Number90N25369Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 590-14-61-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016053.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Amalgamated Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10- KSB for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Wang Xiao Peng, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





June 20, 2011





/s/Wang Xiao PengWang Xiao Peng, President and Chief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer &Principal Financial Officer
23.1104 Policy.       Agencies shall encourage contractors and subcontractors to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving-                                       (a) 						            Company-owned or rented vehicles or Government-owned vehicles; or                                          (b) 						            Privately-owned vehicles when on official Government business or when performing any work for or on behalf of the Government.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 23.11 - Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving
EXHIBIT 31.1



I, Bruce Wasserstein, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 of Lazard Group LLC (the Registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) [Reserved]



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 10, 2005



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/  Bruce Wasserstein                                
|Bruce Wasserstein Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.30 Amendments to Act and regulations.

A RBIC is subject to all existing and future provisions of the Act and part 4290 of title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
#### § 3560.700 OMB control number.

The information collection requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and have been assigned OMB control number 0575-0189. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to vary from 15 minutes to 18 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. A person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
----

----

Fox Petroleum Inc. 10-Q/A

| (1)   | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |   |                                                                   |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: August 19, 2011   | By:    | /s/ William Lieberman                                                  |   |
|                              |   | William Lieberman                                                      |   |
|                              |   | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Fox Petroleum Inc. |   |
|                              |   |                                                                   |   |

----
27.202-4 Refund of royalties.

The clause at 52.227-9, Refund of Royalties, establishes procedures to pay the contractor royalties

under the contract and recover royalties not paid by the contractor when the royalties were included

in the contractor’s fixed price.

Parent topic: 27.202 Royalties.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

FRANCIS ESPOSITO, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No.: 5:20cv245-MW/MJF

NATIONAL BASKETBALL

ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 28. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation, ECF No. 28, is accepted and adopted as 

this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Plaintiffs’ claims are 

DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with court orders.” The Clerk 

Case 5:20-cv-00245-MW-MJF Document 29 Filed 06/10/21 Page 1 of 2
2

shall close the file.

SO ORDERED on June 10, 2021.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 5:20-cv-00245-MW-MJF Document 29 Filed 06/10/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 4284.1105 Review or appeal rights.

Agency decisions that are adverse to the individual participant are appealable, while matters of general applicability are not subject to appeal; however, such decisions are reviewable for appealability by the National Appeals Division (NAD). All appeals will be conducted by NAD and will be handled in accordance with 7 CFR part 11.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73163-73164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

November 23, 2010.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. A copy of the submission 
may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer 
listed. Comments regarding these information collections should be 
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury PRA Clearance 
Officer, Department of the Treasury, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Suite 11010, Washington, DC 20220.

[[Page 73164]]


DATES: Written comments should be received on or before December 29, 
2010 to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0199.
    Type of Review: Extension without change to a currently approved 
collection.
    Title: Application for Approval of Prototype Simplified Employee 
Pension (SEP) or Savings Incentive Match Plan for Employees of Small 
Employers (SIMPLE IRA Plan).
    Form: 5306-A.
    Abstract: This form is used by banks, credit unions, insurance 
companies, and trade or professional associations to apply for approval 
of a Simplified Employee Pension Plan or Savings Incentive Match Plan 
to be used by more than one employer. The data collected is used to 
determine if the prototype plan submitted is an approved plan.
    Respondents: Private sector: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 94,400 hours.
    Bureau Clearance Officer: Allan Hopkins, Internal Revenue Service, 
1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224; (202) 622-6665.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and Budget, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-
7873.

Dawn D. Wolfgang,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-29931 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
3.104-2 General.

(a) This section implements 41 U.S.C. chapter 21, Restrictions on Obtaining and Disclosing Certain

Information. Agency supplementation of 3.104, including specific definitions to identify individuals

who occupy positions specified in 3.104-3(d)(1)(ii), and any clauses required by 3.104 must be

approved by the senior procurement executive of the agency, unless a law establishes a higher level

of approval for that agency.

(b) Agency officials are reminded that there are other statutes and regulations that deal with the

same or related prohibited conduct, for example-

(1) The offer or acceptance of a bribe or gratuity is prohibited by 18 U.S.C. 201 and 10 U.S.C. 4651.

The acceptance of a gift, under certain circumstances, is prohibited by 5 U.S.C. 7353 and 5 CFR Part

2635;

(2) Contacts with an offeror during the conduct of an acquisition may constitute "seeking

employment," (see Subpart F of 5 CFR Part 2636 and 3.104-3(c)(2)). Government officers and

employees (employees) are prohibited by 18 U.S.C. 208 and 5 CFR Part 2635 from participating

personally and substantially in any particular matter that would affect the financial interests of any

person with whom the employee is seeking employment. An employee who engages in negotiations

or is otherwise seeking employment with an offeror or who has an arrangement concerning future

employment with an offeror must comply with the applicable disqualification requirements of 5 CFR

2635.604 and 2635.606. The statutory prohibition in 18 U.S.C. 208 also may require an employee’s

disqualification from participation in the acquisition even if the employee’s duties may not be

considered "participating personally and substantially," as this term is defined in 3.104-1;

(3) Post-employment restrictions are covered by 18 U.S.C. 207 and 5 CFR parts 2637 and 2641, that

prohibit certain activities by former Government employees, including representation of a contractor

before the Government in relation to any contract or other particular matter involving specific

parties on which the former employee participated personally and substantially while employed by

the Government. Additional restrictions apply to certain senior Government employees and for

particular matters under an employee’s official responsibility;

(4) parts 14 and 15 place restrictions on the release of information related to procurements and

other contractor information that must be protected under 18 U.S.C. 1905;

(5) Release of information both before and after award (see 3.104-4) may be prohibited by the

Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), the Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. 1905), and other laws; and

(6) Using nonpublic information to further an employee’s private interest or that of another and

engaging in a financial transaction using nonpublic information are prohibited by 5 CFR 2635.703.

Parent topic: 3.104 Procurement integrity.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2533 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphorus Thiochloride. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphorus 

Thiochloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHORUS THIOCHLORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.75 Phosphorus Thiochloride 

(CAS No. 3982–91–0) (provided for in subheading 

2851.00.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 2533 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-5464

_____________________________

HORACE CUMMINGS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Bruce R. Anderson, Jr., Judge.

April 13, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Horace Cummings, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
22.300 Scope of subpart.       This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for applying the requirements of 40 U.S.C.chapter 37, Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards (the statute) to contracts that may require or involve laborers or mechanics. In this subpart, the term "laborers or mechanics" includes apprentices, trainees, helpers, watchmen, guards, firefighters, fireguards, and workmen who perform services in connection with dredging or rock excavation in rivers or harbors, but does not include any employee employed as a seaman.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 22.3 - Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act
#### Michael Ring et al., Respondents, v Anabil USA, Inc., Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 68]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered March 25, 2005, which, in an action to recover rent due under a commercial lease, upon the prior grant of plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, awarded plaintiffs the total sum of $341,346.24, unanimously modified, on the law, to reduce the amount of the award by the amount of the security deposit defendant is entitled to have returned to it, and otherwise affirmed, without costs, and the matter remanded for further proceeding to calculate such offset.

There are no issues of fact precluding an award of summary judgment to plaintiffs. The evidence demonstrates that plaintiffs did not consent to defendant’s early termination of the lease and, pursuant to the lease, defendant was responsible for the payment of rent and other costs through March 31, 2005. Defendant is, however, entitled to have the judgment offset as above indicated.

Defendant’s additional argument is unavailing. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 5:92cr5006LAC

G. E. LOVETT

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on February 6, 2006

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION TO REDUCE OR SENTENCE PURSUANT TO RULE 35 

Filed by DEFT PRO SE on2/3/06 Doc.# 176

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 7th day of

February, 2006, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) The decision to file or not file a Rule 35 motion is a matter of

prosecutorial discretion. The government has a power, not a duty, to file such

a motion when a defendant has substantially assisted. Only the government can

make the decision, not the court.

 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 5:92-cr-05006-LC-MD Document 177 Filed 02/07/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of SRKP 3, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
      in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Richard RappaportRichard
                RappaportPresident
                (Principal Executive Officer)/s/
                Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
                C. PintsopoulosChief
                Financial Officer (Principal Financial
                Officer)




November  13,
      2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      SRKP 3, Inc. and will be retained by SRKP 3, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

STEVEN H. BEASLEY, 

Plaintiff,

vs. 5:02cv129-MP/WCS

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 / 

O R D E R

The answer has been filed, doc. 107, and it is time for the parties to file

memoranda in support of their respective positions. Plaintiff has the burden to

demonstrate that Defendant's decision to deny benefits was incorrect. Thus, Plaintiff

has the burden to file the first memorandum. Failure of Plaintiff to file a memorandum

specifically addressing the claimed error as instructed by this order will be deemed to be

a failure to prosecute and will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed

for that reason.

Case 5:02-cv-00129-MP-WCS Document 115 Filed 08/28/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:02cv129-MP

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall have until October 15, 2008, to file a memorandum in support of

the complaint. The memorandum shall set forth Plaintiff's legal contentions and shall

cite the record by page number for every factual contention.

2. Defendant shall have 30 days from receipt of Plaintiff's memorandum in which

to file a response and shall cite the record by page number for every factual contention. 

3. Neither memorandum shall exceed 35 pages without a showing of good

cause and approval by the court; the page limit of Local Rule 7.1 is so modified.

DONE AND ORDERED on August 28, 2008.

 S/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:02-cv-00129-MP-WCS Document 115 Filed 08/28/08 Page 2 of 2