alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Investors Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: February 14, 2006
    /s/ Domenick A. CamaDomenick A. CamaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# Foreword

The FAR is the primary regulation for use by all executive agencies in their acquisition of supplies and services with appropriated funds. It became effective on April 1, 1984, and is issued within applicable laws under the joint authorities of the Administrator of General Services, the Secretary of Defense, and the Administrator for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, under the broad policy guidelines of the Administrator, Office of Federal Procurement Policy, Office of Management and Budget.

The FAR precludes agency acquisition regulations that unnecessarily repeat, paraphrase, or otherwise restate the FAR, limits agency acquisition regulations to those necessary to implement FAR policies and procedures within an agency, and provides for coordination, simplicity, and uniformity in the Federal acquisition process. It also provides for agency and public participation in developing the FAR and agency acquisition regulation.

The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) includes all Federal Acquisition Circulars through 2024-03 effective February 23, 2024. Beginning in fiscal year 2019, designation of Federal Acquisition Circulars was changed to reflect the fiscal year in the first four digits and the sequence of the issued circular in the last two digits.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of
Adelphia Communications Corporation (Adelphia) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William T. Schleyer, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Adelphia, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Adelphia.  /s/ William T. SchleyerWilliam T. SchleyerChairman and Chief Executive OfficerOctober 6, 2005
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 5:03cr18-RH/WCS

5:04cv168-RH/WCS

CARLTON GWYN SEIGLER,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING §2255 MOTION

This matter is before the court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation (document 26), to which no objections have been filed. I

conclude that the Report and Recommendation is correct, with this note of

clarification.

Defendant has filed a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. §2255, raising

claims under the line of cases that includes Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466

(2000), Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), and United States v.

Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). This is defendant’s first §2255 motion; the motion

is not second or successive. And the motion was filed within the one-year

statutory limitations period. Cases dealing with the prerequisites to the filing of a

second or successive motion, or to the tolling or reopening of the limitations

Case 5:03-cr-00018-RH-WCS Document 27 Filed 04/20/05 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No: 5:03cr18-RH/WCS and 5:04cv168-RH/WCS

period, thus have no applicability here.

The Apprendi line of cases recognizes two rights: first, the right to trial by

jury with respect to any fact (other than a prior conviction) that would increase the

maximum sentence that could be imposed on a defendant; and second, the right to

have any such fact established by proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The Supreme

Court has held that the jury-right component of the Apprendi principle is not

retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. See Schriro v. Summerlin,

124 S. Ct. 2519, 159 L. Ed. 2d 442 (2004). As an original matter, one could argue

either side of the issue whether the same should be true of the proof-beyond-areasonable-doubt component of the Apprendi principle. Decisions of the Eleventh

Circuit, however, foreclose, at least at the district court level, any assertion that the

proof-beyond-a-reasonable doubt component of Apprendi can be raised on

collateral review. See, e.g., Varela v. United States, 40 F.3d 864 (11th Cir. 2005)

(concluding that Booker does not apply retroactively to §2255 cases on collateral

review); McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1256-58 (11th Cir. 2001)

(holding that Apprendi is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review).

 For these reasons, 

IT IS ORDERED:

The Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the further

Case 5:03-cr-00018-RH-WCS Document 27 Filed 04/20/05 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No: 5:03cr18-RH/WCS and 5:04cv168-RH/WCS

opinion of the court. Defendant’s motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C.

§2255 (document 23) is DENIED. The clerk shall enter judgment and close the

file.

SO ORDERED this 20th day of April, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 5:03-cr-00018-RH-WCS Document 27 Filed 04/20/05 Page 3 of 3
#### Benjamin Margolis, Appellant, v. New York Telephone Company, Respondent.

Herlihy, J.

Appeal from a judgment and order granting summary judgment. The action was for a judgment declaring the demand for payment of monthly telephone service charges in advance unconstitutional. In the first instance, the reasonableness of a utility’s tariff provision is a question to be determined by the Public Service Commission. On the meager papers presented by the plaintiff there is no showing that the defendant has acted unreasonably or to the prejudice or discrimination of the plaintiff. The requirement of advanced payment of telephone charges has been considered to be a reasonable provision. (See *Hare*v. *New York Tel. Co.,*101 Misc. 490, affd. 181 App. Div. 907; *Southwestern Tel. Co.*v. *Danaher,*238 U. S. 482, 490.) Judgment and order affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Brink, JJ., concur with Herlihy, J.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Denise Smith, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Silver Pearl Enterprises, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date: November 16, 2006



|/s/ | Denise Smith            | 
|--- | ----------------------- | 
|    | Chief Financial Officer |
§ 3560.65 Reserve account. ( a ) For new construction, to meet major capital expenses of a housing project, applicants must establish and fund a reserve account that meets the requirements of § 3560.306. The applicant must agree to make monthly contributions to the reserve account pursuant to a reserve account analysis which sets forth how the reserve account funds will meet the capital needs of the property over an acceptable 20-year period. The reserve account analysis is based on either a Capital Needs Assessment or life cycle cost analysis, provided and acceptable to Rural Development by the applicant. Adjustments may be made to the contribution amount at 5 or 10-year intervals, either through an updated Capital Needs Assessment or as part of the original life cycle cost analysis. The cost of conducting either a Capital Needs Assessment or life cycle cost analysis will be paid for by the applicant. The cost of the initial Capital Needs Assessment or life cycle cost analysis may be included in the loan financing.
( b ) For ownership transfers or sales, the requirements of § 3560.406(d)(5) will be met.
( c ) For other existing properties, at a minimum the borrower must agree to make monthly contributions to the reserve account at the rate of 1 percent annually of the amount of total development cost until the reserve account equals 10 percent of the total development cost.
( d ) The agency may establish an escrow account for the collection and disbursement of reserve account funds.
[77 FR 40255, July 9, 2012, as amended at 87 FR 11280, Mar. 1, 2022]
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
          REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
                       OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         I, Eric Bello, Treasurer (principal financial officer) of Quipp, Inc.,
a Florida corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my
knowledge:


         (1)      The Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended
                  December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                      * * *




ERIC BELLO
---------------------------------------
Eric Bello
Treasurer (principal financial officer)


Date:    March 29, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2383 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2383

  To amend the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation 
     Equity Act: A Legacy for Users to make a technical correction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2006

  Mr. Baucus introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation 
     Equity Act: A Legacy for Users to make a technical correction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONTRACT AUTHORITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 1940 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, 
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (Public Law 
109-59; 119 Stat. 1511) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Contract Authority.--Funds made available to carry out this 
section shall be available for obligation in the same manner as if the 
funds were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States 
Code.''.
    (b) Recision.--Of the unobligated balances of funds apportioned to 
States under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, $50,000,000 is 
rescinded.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of APA Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anil K. Jain, Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
                15(d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Signature: /s/
      Anil K. Jain


Print
      Name: Anil
      K. Jain


Print
      Title: Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
§ 4280.150 Project eligibility. To be eligible for an EA or a REDA grant, the grant funds for a project must be used by the grantee to assist agricultural producers or rural small businesses in one of the purposes specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, and must also comply with paragraphs (c) through (f) of this section. ( a ) Conducting and promoting energy audits as defined in 4280.103.
( b ) Conducting and promoting REDA by providing to agricultural producers and rural small businesses recommendations and information on how to improve the energy efficiency of the operations and to use renewable energy technologies and resources in their operations.
( c ) EA and REDA can be provided only to a project located in a rural area unless the grantee of such project is an agricultural producer. If the project is owned by an agricultural producer, the project for which such services are being provided may be located in either a rural or non-rural area and the EA or REDA can only be for an EEI or RES on components that support the production, processing, vertical integration, or marketing of agricultural products. If the agricultural producer's operation is in a non-rural area, then the Energy Audit or REDA can only be for RES or EEI components of the business operation that are directly related to and their use and purpose is limited to the agricultural production operation, such as vertically integrated operations, and are part of and co-located with the agricultural production operation.
( d ) The EA or REDA must be provided to a recipient in a State.
( e ) The applicant must have a place of business in a State.
( f ) The applicant is cautioned against taking any actions or incurring any obligations prior to the Agency completing the environmental review that would either limit the range of alternatives to be considered or that would have an adverse effect on the environment, such as the initiation of construction. If the applicant takes any such actions or incurs any such obligations, it could result in project ineligibility.
Exhibit 32(ii)

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Form 10-K of National Bankshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, I, J. Robert Buchanan, Treasurer of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:

 

(1)  such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securties Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.

 

 

 

| /s/ J. ROBERT BUCHANAN                                       |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| J. Robert Buchanan

Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer) |
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

- 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TIMOTHY BOISVERT,

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

GC SERVICES, LP, 

 Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 3:20-cv-05612-RV-HTC 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff, TIMOTHY BOISVERT (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, GC SERVICES, LP 

(“Defendant”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate to the 

dismissal of all of Plaintiff’s claims in this action against Defendant WITH PREJUDICE, with 

each party to bear its own costs and fees. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 

Dated: October 5, 2020 

 

By: /s/ Jason S. Weiss

Jason S. Weiss 

Florida Bar #356890 

WEISS LAW GROUP, P.A. 

5531 N. University Drive, Suite 103 Coral 

Springs, FL 33067 

Tel: (954) 573-2800 

Fax: (954) 573-2798 

E: Jason@jswlawyer.com 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

By: Ryan Kent Hilton (with permission)

Ryan Kent Hilton 

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP 

Tampa Fl 

400 North Ashley Drive, Ste 2300 

Tampa, Fl 33602 

Tel: 813-281-1900 

Fax: 813-281-0900 

Email: rhilton@butler.legal 

Counsel for Defendant

 

Case 3:20-cv-05612-RV-HTC Document 13 Filed 10/05/20 Page 1 of 2
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on October 5, 2020, a true and correct copy of the foregoing JOINT 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL was filed using the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will notify 

all attorneys of record. 

Ryan Kent Hilton 

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP 

Tampa Fl 

400 North Ashley Drive, Ste 2300 

Tampa, Fl 33602 

Tel: 813-281-1900 

Fax: 813-281-0900 

Email: rhilton@butler.legal

Counsel for Defendant

By: /s/ Jason S. Weiss

Jason S. Weiss 

Florida Bar #356890 

WEISS LAW GROUP, P.A. 

5531 N. University Drive, Suite 103 Coral 

Springs, FL 33067 

Tel: (954) 573-2800 

Fax: (954) 573-2798 

E: Jason@jswlawyer.com 

Case 3:20-cv-05612-RV-HTC Document 13 Filed 10/05/20 Page 2 of 2
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-3264 

MARIEO L. FOSTER, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, 

Respondent. 

Richard L. Thompson, II, Law Firm of Nathaniel D. Johnson, LLC, of La Plata, 

Maryland, argued for petitioner. With him on the brief was Nathaniel D. Johnson. 

Sean M. Dunn, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United 

States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the 

brief were Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General; Jeanne E. Davidson, 

Director; and Harold D. Lester, Jr., Assistant Director. 

 

Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-3264 

MARIEO L. FOSTER, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, 

 Respondent. 

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 

 

in CASE NO(S). DC0752060765-I-1

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (SCHALL and PROST, Circuit Judges, and WARD, District Judge∗ 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED June 6, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk 

 ∗

 Honorable T. John Ward, District Judge, United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Texas, sitting by designation.