alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RALI Series 2006-QS12 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  National City Mortgage
Co., SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ---------------------
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title: Managing Director
From: Garth Tayler <gtayler@brick.com>

Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 3:46 PM

To: Nizich, Sharon

Cc: 'Susan Miller'; Terry Schimmel
Subject: Memo: Mercury data

Dear Sharon

Further to tour recent conference call with Susan Miller, Terry Schimmel and other Task Force members on 6/25/2015, I submit for your information a short memo explaining a recent development in the industry that we did not mention on the call. Please don’t hesitate to call if you have questions. Thank you

Dr. Garth Tayler
Technical Director Acme Brick Company Fort Worth, Texas. (817) 907 1208 (cell) (817) 8708354 (office)

<< NBRCMERCURY.docx >>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00444

- CV

Tawnya Brigandi

v.

American Mortgage Investment

Partners Fund I Trust §

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 2

of Denton County (CV

- 2016

- 01542)

April 20, 2017

Per Curiam



### JUDGMENT

This court has co nsidered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. We grant American Mortgage Investment

Partners Fund I Trust’s motion to dismiss, vacate the underlying court’s

judgments without consideration of the merits, and dis miss the case as moot

.

It is further ordered that appellant Tawnya Brigandi shall bear the costs of

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
#### Angelina Rosse, Appellant, v Scott A. Sobsey, Respondent.

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 9, 1979, affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see *London v Moore,*32 AD2d 543). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74052-74053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29997]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 2010-29489) published on 
pages 71440 and 71441 of the issue for Tuesday, November 23, 2010.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas heading, the entry for 
Commercial Bancshares, Inc., El Campo, Texas, is revised to read as 
follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200

[[Page 74053]]

North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Commercial Bancshares, Inc., El Campo, Texas; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 75 percent of the voting shares of El 
Campo Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 
Commercial State Bank, both of El Campo, Texas.
    Comments on this application must be received by December 17, 2010.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 23, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-29997 Filed 11-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
26.206 Solicitation provision and contract

clauses.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.226-3, Disaster or Emergency Area

Representation, in solicitations involving the local area set-aside. For commercial products and

commercial services, see 12.301(e)(5).

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.226-4, Notice of Disaster or Emergency Area

Set-aside in solicitations and contracts involving local area set-asides.

(c) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.226-5, Restrictions on Subcontracting

Outside Disaster or Emergency Area, in all solicitations and contracts that involve local area setasides.

Parent topic: Subpart 26.2 - Major Disaster or Emergency Assistance Activities
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-11703

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

COLUMBUS DONAVAN JEFFREY, 

a.k.a. hideme1977,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 3:20-cr-00017-TJC-PDB-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 21-11703 Date Filed: 04/15/2022 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-11703

Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Meghan Ann Collins, counsel for Columbus Donavan Jeffrey in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from 

further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review 

of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative 

merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination 

of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s 

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jeffrey’s convictions and 

sentence are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 21-11703 Date Filed: 04/15/2022 Page: 2 of 2
§ 4284.1102 Organization of subpart. This subpart is organized into distinct sections as described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. ( a ) Sections 4284.1103 through 4284.1111 discuss definitions; exception authority; review or appeal rights; conflict of interest; USDA departmental regulations; other applicable laws; ineligible applicants; general applicant, application, and funding provisions; and notifications, which are applicable to funding the program under this subpart.
( b ) Sections 4284.1112 and 4284.1113 discuss, respectively, applicant and project eligibility. Section 4284.1114 addresses funding provisions for these grants. Sections 4284.1115 through 4284.1120 address grant application content and required documentation, scoring, selection, awarding and administering grant applications, and servicing of grant awards.
19.707 The Small Business Administration’s

role in carrying out the program.

(a) Under the program, the SBA may-

(1) Assist both Government agencies and contractors in carrying out their responsibilities with

regard to subcontracting plans;

(2) Review (within 5 working days) any solicitation that meets the dollar threshold in 19.702(a)(1)(i)

or (ii) before the solicitation is issued;

(3) Review (within 5 working days) before execution any negotiated contractual document requiring

a subcontracting plan, including the plan itself, and submit recommendations to the contracting

officer, which shall be advisory in nature; and

(4) Evaluate compliance with subcontracting plans, either on a contract-by-contract basis, or, in the

case of contractors having multiple contracts, on an aggregate basis.

(b) The SBA is not authorized to-

(1) Prescribe the extent to which any contractor or subcontractor shall subcontract,

(2) Specify concerns to which subcontracts will be awarded, or

(3) Exercise any authority regarding the administration of individual prime contracts or

subcontracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 19.7 - The Small Business Subcontracting Program
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">South Shore Adjustment Co., LLC, as Successor Assignee in Interest To HSBC/Household/Orchard Bank, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Raul R. Marcia, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Raul R. Marcia, appellant pro se.E. Hope Greenberg, Esq., for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the District Court of Suffolk County, First District (Vincent J. Martorana, J.), entered June 15, 2016. The order denied defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment of that court entered March 9, 2007 upon defendant's failure to appear or answer the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this action to recover for breach of a credit card agreement and upon an account stated, a default judgment was entered on March 9, 2007 against defendant in the sum of $1,843.28. Thereafter, the parties entered into a stipulation of settlement wherein defendant was required to make installment payments until the balance due was paid in full. In the event of a default by defendant, plaintiff was entitled to enforce the judgment entered on default. After defendant defaulted in making the installment payments pursuant to the stipulation of settlement, plaintiff sought to enforce the judgment. Thereafter, defendant moved to vacate the default judgment. The District Court denied defendant's motion.</p><p>While a stipulation's enforcement remains subject to the supervision of the courts (<i>see Malvin v Schwartz</i>, 65 AD2d 769 [1978], <i>affd</i> 48 NY2d 693 [1979]), settlement stipulations are favored and will not be undone absent proof that the settlement was obtained by fraud, collusion, mistake, accident or other ground sufficient to invalidate a contract (<i>see e.g. Hallock v State of New York</i>, 64 NY2d 224 [1984]; <i>Matter of Frutiger</i>, 29 NY2d 143 [1971]; <i>Cach, LLC v Woodsnajac</i>, 42 Misc 3d 129[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 52165[U], *1 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2013]). Here, defendant's moving papers merely raised his defenses in the underlying action, which defenses were waived by his entry into the stipulation, and failed to offer any basis for why he had not complied with the stipulation or a sufficient ground for vacating it.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>MARANO, P.J., TOLBERT and GARGUILO, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: November 09, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Amendment No.2 to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.8 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 WHEREAS, Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC (“Company”) George H. Cave and (“Executive”) entered into an Employment
Agreement dated as of May 26, 2005 (“Agreement”) and as previously amended; 
 WHEREAS, all defined terms used herein
shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement unless specifically defined herein; 
 WHEREAS, as of November 12, 2008 the
Compensation Committee (“Committee”) of the Board of Directors of ON Semiconductor Corporation considered and approved an increase, effective January 4, 2009, of the maximum target bonus percentage for the Executive from 50% to 60% of
his Base Salary during the applicable Performance Cycle under a bonus Program established and approved by the Committee and/or Board; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive now wish to amend the Agreement to reflect the increase to the maximum target bonus percentage to 60% consistent with the Committee’s approvals and make certain related conforming changes
to the Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for mutual consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Agreement is hereby
amended as follows: 
 1. Effective January 4, 2009, Section 2(b) of the Agreement related to “Compensation” is hereby amended by
replacing such section in its entirety with the following: 
 “(b) In addition to the Base Salary, during the Employment
Period, the Executive shall be eligible to participate in the bonus program established and approved by the Board (the “Program”) and, pursuant to the Program, the Executive may earn a bonus (the “Bonus”) on an annual or other
performance period basis (a “Performance Cycle”) of up to a maximum target of 60% of Base Salary earned during the applicable Performance Cycle or an additional amount as approved by the Board under the Program and in each case based on
certain performance criteria; provided that the Executive is actively employed by the Company on the date the Bonuses are paid under the Program, except as provided in Section 5(a) herein. The Bonus may be paid annually or more frequently
depending upon the Performance Cycle, as determined by the Board and pursuant to the Program. The Bonus will be specified by the Board, and the Bonus will be reviewed at least annually by the Board.” 
  

 1 








 2. This Agreement shall amend only the provisions of the Agreement as set forth herein. Those provisions of the Agreement
not expressly amended shall be considered in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Company have executed
this Amendment as of the 30 day of April 2009. 
  

									
	COMPANY:	 		 	Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/    COLLEEN MCKEOWN

		 		 		 	Name:	 	Colleen McKeown
		 		 		 	Title:	 	Senior Vice President of Human Resources
			
	EXECUTIVE:	 		 	George H. Cave, in his individual capacity
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/    GEORGE H. CAVE

		 		 		 	Name:	 	George H. Cave
		 		 		 	Title:	 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance and Ethics Officer and Secretary

  

 2
§ 3201.86 Pneumatic equipment lubricants. ( a ) *Definition.* Lubricants designed specifically for pneumatic equipment, including air compressors, vacuum pumps, in-line lubricators, rock drills, jackhammers, etc.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 67 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than April 4, 2013, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased pneumatic equipment lubricants. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased pneumatic equipment lubricants.
( d ) *Determining overlap with an EPA-designated recovered content product.* Qualifying products within this item may overlap with the EPA-designated recovered content product: Vehicular Products—re-refined lubricating oils. USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information on the USDA Web site of qualifying biobased products about the intended uses of the product, information on whether or not the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether or not a qualifying biobased product overlaps with EPA-designated re-refined lubricating oil products and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing.
Note to paragraph ( d
):
Biobased pneumatic equipment lubricants within this designated product category can compete with similar re-refined lubricating oil products with recycled content. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designated re-refined lubricating oil products containing recovered materials as products for which Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.17.
[77 FR 20289, Apr. 4, 2012]
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Material Sciences Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Clifford D. Nastas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



July 9, 2010By:

/s/ Clifford D. NastasClifford D. NastasChief Executive Officer


In connection with the Report,
I, James D. Pawlak, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



July 9, 2010By:

/s/ James D. PawlakJames D. PawlakVice President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller and Corporate Secretary




31
16.603-2 Application.       (a) 						            A letter contract may be used when (1) the Government’s interests demand that the contractor be given a binding commitment so that work can start immediately and (2) negotiating a definitive contract is not possible in sufficient time to meet the requirement. However, a letter contract should be as complete and definite as feasible under the circumstances.                                          (b) 						            When a letter contract award is based on price competition, the contracting officer shall include an overall price ceiling in the letter contract.                                          (c) 						            Each letter contract shall, as required by the clause at 52.216-25, Contract Definitization, contain a negotiated definitization schedule including (1) dates for submission of the contractor's price proposal, required certified cost or pricing data and data other than certified cost or pricing data; and, if required, make-or-buy and subcontracting plans, (2) a date for the start of negotiations, and (3) a target date for definitization, which shall be the earliest practicable date for definitization. The schedule will provide for definitization of the contract within 180 days after the date of the letter contract or before completion of 40 percent of the work to be performed, whichever occurs first. However, the contracting officer may, in extreme cases and according to agency procedures, authorize an additional period. If, after exhausting all reasonable efforts, the contracting officer and the contractor cannot negotiate a definitive contract because of failure to reach agreement as to price or fee, the clause at 52.216-25 requires the contractor to proceed with the work and provides that the contracting officer may, with the approval of the head of the contracting activity, determine a reasonable price or fee in accordance with subpart  15.4 and part  31, subject to appeal as provided in the Disputes clause.                                          (d) 						            The maximum liability of the Government inserted in the clause at 52.216-24, Limitation of Government Liability, shall be the estimated amount necessary to cover the contractor’s requirements for funds before definitization. However, it shall not exceed 50 percent of the estimated cost of the definitive contract unless approved in advance by the official that authorized the letter contract.                                          (e) 						            The contracting officer shall assign a priority rating to the letter contract if it is appropriate under 11.604.    **Parent topic:** 16.603 Letter contracts.
§ 4279.234 Terms of loan. The loan terms, other than Interest, must be the same for both the guaranteed and unguaranteed portions of the loan. ( a ) The repayment term for a loan under this subpart will be no greater than the lesser of 20 years from the date of loan closing or the useful life of the Project, as determined by the Lender and confirmed by the Agency. Both the guaranteed and unguaranteed portions of the loan must be amortized over the same term.
( b ) A loan's maturity will take into consideration the use of proceeds, the useful life of assets being financed, and the Borrower's ability to repay the loan.
( c ) The first installment of principal and Interest will, if possible, be scheduled for payment after the Project is operational and has begun to generate income. However, the first full installment must be due and payable within three years from the date of the Promissory Note and be paid at least annually thereafter. In cases where there is an Interest-only period, Interest will be paid at least annually from the date of the Promissory Note.
( d ) Only loans that require a periodic payment schedule that will retire the debt over the term of the loan without a balloon payment will be guaranteed except the final payment may be the funds held in the debt service reserve account.