alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ROBERT H. BEVERLIN,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-178-AW-GRJ

LAURA PETERSEN, 

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Laura Petersen, the remaining defendant, has moved to dismiss. ECF No. 13. 

The magistrate judge has issued a report and recommendation, concluding I should 

grant that motion. ECF No. 18. Neither party has filed any objection. Having 

carefully considered the matter, I agree with the magistrate judge.

Beverlin has not stated a plausible Eighth Amendment claim because he has 

not alleged facts that would support a finding of deliberate indifference. And he has 

stated no plausible state-law claim for elder abuse. Beverlin will have a final 

opportunity to amend to state a claim. 

The report and recommendation (ECF No. 18) is adopted and incorporated 

into this order. The motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13) is GRANTED. Beverlin has 20 

days to file a second amended complaint. If he does not do so, the case will be 

dismissed. 

Case 1:20-cv-00178-AW-GRJ Document 20 Filed 08/16/21 Page 1 of 2
2

The magistrate judge will conduct further appropriate proceedings. 

SO ORDERED on August 16, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00178-AW-GRJ Document 20 Filed 08/16/21 Page 2 of 2
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:94CR3012LAC

LEONARD BRADSHAW

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on May 10, 2007

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURES 60(b)(6) 

Filed byDEFENDANT PRO SE on4/26/07 Doc.# 740

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 15th day of

May, 2007, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Rule 60(b) cannot be used to circumvent the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 2255,

as is being attempted here. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:94-cr-03012-LC-MD Document 741 Filed 05/15/07 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cv5688/LAC/EMT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

STONEY GLENN,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5688/LAC/EMT

A. POWELL, et al., 

Defendants.

____________________/

ORDER

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on February 

8, 2021 (ECF No. 11). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

11) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court.

Case 3:20-cv-05688-LC-EMT Document 12 Filed 03/10/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cv5688/LAC/EMT

3. The clerk of court is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of March, 2021.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05688-LC-EMT Document 12 Filed 03/10/21 Page 2 of 2
§ 322.29 Dead bees. ( a ) Dead bees imported into or transiting the United States must be either: ( 1 ) Immersed in a solution containing at least 70 percent alcohol or a suitable fixative for genetic research;
( 2 ) Immersed in liquid nitrogen; or
( 3 ) Pinned and dried in the manner of scientific specimens.
( b ) Dead bees are subject to inspection at the port of entry in the United States to confirm that the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section have been met.
Case 3:20-cr-00057-MCR Document 3 Filed 07/28/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:20-cr-00057-MCR Document 3 Filed 07/28/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:20-cr-00057-MCR Document 3 Filed 07/28/20 Page 3 of 3
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 221 (Thursday, November 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 68102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27531]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2012 / 
Notices

[[Page 68102]]

ARCTIC RESEARCH COMMISSION

Programs and Research Projects Affecting the Arctic; 99th Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Arctic Research Commission 
will hold its 99th meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, on 
December 10-11, 2012. The business sessions, open to the public, will 
convene at 9 a.m. on December 10 and December 11. An afternoon meeting 
on December 10 from 2:15-5:30 p.m. will be closed to the public.
    The Agenda items include:

(1) Call to order and approval of the agenda
(2) Approval of the minutes from the 98th meeting
(3) Commissioners and staff reports
(4) Discussion and presentations concerning Arctic research activities

    The focus of the meeting will be reports and updates on programs 
and research projects affecting the Arctic.
    If you plan to attend this meeting, please notify us via the 
contact information below. Any person planning to attend who requires 
special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign 
language interpreters, must inform the Commission of those needs in 
advance of the meeting.

Contact Person For Further Information: John Farrell, Executive 
Director, U.S. Arctic Research Commission, 703-525-0111 or TDD 703-306-
0090.

John Farrell,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-27531 Filed 11-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   5


<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      790,001
<SECURITIES>                                8,397
<RECEIVABLES>                               991,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,794,758
<PP&E>                                      49,637
<DEPRECIATION>                              28,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,779,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       131,998
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    3,310
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,643,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,779,055
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            0
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            362,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (362,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (362,182)
<DISCONTINUED>                              (65,925)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                (428,107)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.76)


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

AH/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

HENRY A. PANIAGUA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-30165

D.C. No. 3:03-cr-00171-JKS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Alaska

James K. Singleton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2010** 

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Henry A. Paniagua appeals from the 18-month sentence imposed following

revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1291, and we affirm.

FILED

MAR 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
AH/Research 09-30165

Paniagua contends that his sentence impermissibly increases the sentence

imposed for the underlying offense and that it violates the Eighth Amendment’s

prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. The district court imposed the

bottom-of-the-Guidelines 18-month sentence to run consecutive to the sentence

imposed for the drug conspiracy conviction underlying the supervised release

violation.

The record reflects that the district court imposed the 18-month sentence for

the legitimate purpose of punishing Paniagua for breaching the court’s trust by

violating the conditions of his supervised release. See United States v. Simtob, 485

F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir. 2007). Moreover, Paniagua failed to demonstrate that

his consecutive sentence is grossly disproportionate to his violation of mandatory

terms of supervised release. See United States v. Meiners, 485 F.3d 1211, 1213

(9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam); see also Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63, 72 (2003).

AFFIRMED.
25.302-6 Contract clause.       (a) 						            Use the clause at 52.225-26, Contractors Performing Private Security Functions Outside the United States, in solicitations and contracts for performance outside the United States in an area of-                                                         (1) 								                Combat operations, as designated by the Secretary of Defense; or                                                            (2) 								                Other significant military operations, as designated by the Secretary of Defense and only upon agreement of the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State.                                                                             (b) 						            The clause is not required to be used for-                                                         (1) 								                Contracts entered into by elements of the intelligence community in support of intelligence activities; or                                                            (2) 								                Temporary arrangements entered into by non-DoD contractors for the performance of private security functions by individual indigenous personnel not affiliated with a local or expatriate security company.    **Parent topic:** 25.302 Contractors performing private security functions outside the United States.
§ 4280.26 Administration and operation of the Revolving Loan Fund. ( a ) The Intermediary will operate and administer the Revolving Loan Fund. The Intermediary may contract with a third party for administrative services regarding the Fund. However, the Intermediary must permanently retain all Project review, approval, and monitoring authority and responsibility. This authority and responsibility cannot be delegated to any other person or entity.
( b ) Up to 10 percent of Rural Development Grant funds may be applied toward operating expenses over the life of the Fund. Operating expenses include the costs of administering the Fund and Technical Assistance provided to Project owners by Independent Providers.
( c ) In cases where the Intermediary uses its supplemental contribution to the Revolving Loan Fund for a Project other than the Project that resulted in the Intermediary being awarded the Grant, the loan terms must not exceed 10 years and the interest rate must be less than, or equal to, the prevailing prime rate.
Exhibit 32



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



In connection with the Report of Material Sciences Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Clifford D. Nastas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



January 9, 2006By:

/s/ Clifford D. NastasClifford D. NastasChief Executive Officer and Director




In connection with the Report,
I, Jeffrey J. Siemers, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative and Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



January 9, 2006By:

/s/ Jeffrey J. SiemersJeffrey J. SiemersExecutive Vice President, ChiefAdministrative and Financial Officerand Secretary




36
§ 4287.356 Protective Advances. Protective Advances are advances made by the Lender for the purpose of preserving and protecting the Collateral where the Borrower has failed to, will not, or cannot meet its obligations. Lenders must exercise sound judgment in determining that the Protective Advance preserves Collateral and recovery is actually enhanced by making the advance. Lenders cannot make Protective Advances in lieu of additional loans. A Protective Advance claim will be paid only at the time of the final payment as indicated in the Guaranteed Loan Report of Loss. ( a ) The maximum loss to be paid by the Agency will never exceed the original loan amount plus accrued Interest times the percentage of guarantee regardless of any Protective Advances made.
( b ) In the event of a final loss, Protective Advances will accrue Interest at the Promissory Note rate and will be guaranteed at the same percentage of loss as provided in the Loan Note Guarantee. The guarantee will not cover Interest on the Protective Advance accruing after the Interest Termination Date.
( c ) Protective Advances must constitute an indebtedness of the Borrower to the Lender and be secured by the security instruments. Agency written authorization is required when the cumulative total of Protective Advances exceeds $200,000 or 10 percent of the outstanding balance of principal, whichever is less.
#### § 3560.565 Participation with other funding or financing sources.

The requirements established in § 3560.66 apply to all applications for off-farm labor housing loans and grants, except that the 25 percent requirements stated in paragraph § 3560.66(b)(1) may consist of loan and/or grant funds.
AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE 
THE OPERATING AGREEMENT FOR 
VISA ACCOUNTS AND RECEIVABLES
BETWEEN
NORDSTROM NATIONAL CREDIT BANK 
AND
NORDSTROM CREDIT, INC.



     It is hereby agreed that the Operating Agreement for Visa Accounts 
and
Receivables (the Agreement) dated May 1, 1994 between Nordstrom 
National Credit 
Bank (the Bank) and Nordstrom Credit, Inc. (Credit) is terminated 
effective August
14, 1996, upon agreement of both parties.  

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank and Credit have caused this Agreement
to be terminated by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized
as of August 14, 1996.

Nordstrom National Credit Bank



By /s/ John A. Goesling
      -----------------------------
       John A. Goesling, Chairman

By /s/ John C. Walgamott
      -----------------------------
       John C. Walgamott, President


Nordstrom Credit, Inc.



By /s/ John C. Walgamott
       ----------------------------
       John C. Walgamott, President
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:94cr3012 LAC

RODNEY BRIDGES

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on July 21, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on7/21/08 Doc.# 812

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 27

th day of

January, 2009, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) The defendant was held accountable for 50 kilograms or more of cocaine base.

Pursuant to Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines, the Drug Quantity Table

at §2D1.1 assigns a base offense level of 38 for 4.5 kilograms or more of cocaine

base. Since the defendant’s base offense level is unchanged, he is not eligible

for any reduction in his sentence of imprisonment. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:94-cr-03012-LC-MD Document 869 Filed 01/27/09 Page 1 of 1
§ 3560.608 Site and construction requirements. ( a ) *General.* Cost and development standards for on-farm labor housing will be consistent with the requirements, standards, and cost limits specified in subpart B of this part, if the housing is a multi-family housing type structure, or consistent with section 502 of the Housing Act of 1949, if the housing is a single family type structure.
( b ) *Permanent units.* On-farm labor housing occupied for 8 months or more of the year will be required to meet the following requirements. ( 1 ) Housing may be multi-family or single family in type and may be located on the farm away from farm service buildings, or in the nearby community. Single-family type housing is defined as an individual or a group of individual single family detached dwelling units. All sites and housing shall be planned and constructed in accordance with 7 CFR part 1924, subparts A and C.
( 2 ) Sites must be accessible from a public road, when feasible.
( c ) *Seasonal units.* On-farm labor housing occupied for less than 8 months of the year will be considered seasonal housing. Such housing must meet the following requirements. ( 1 ) Housing designed for seasonal occupancy may be either single family or multi-family.
( 2 ) Seasonal housing may be constructed in accordance with exhibit I of 7 CFR part 1924, subpart A. If constructed in accordance with exhibit I, the housing must be suitable to allow for conversion to full-year occupancy if the need for migrant farmworkers in the area declines.
( d ) *Accessibility.* On-farm labor housing that consists of buildings with less than three units, need not meet the requirement that five percent of the units be constructed as fully accessible units, as described in § 3560.60(d). This does not, however, eliminate any other accessibility requirements.
25.301-3 Weapons.

The contracting officer shall follow agency procedures and the weapons policy established by the

combatant commander or the chief of mission when authorizing contractor personnel to carry

weapons (see paragraph (i) of the clause at 52.225-19, Contractor Personnel in a Designated

Operational Area or Supporting a Diplomatic or Consular Mission outside the United States).

Parent topic: 25.301 Contractor personnel in a designated operational area or supporting a

diplomatic or consular mission outside the United States.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CHEYANNE RIVER CROSBY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-220-AW-MJF

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting 

Commissioner of the Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have carefully considered the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 20, and the Plaintiff’s objections, ECF No. 21, which I

have considered de novo. I now conclude that the Report and Recommendation 

should be approved, and it is adopted and incorporated by reference into this order.

The clerk will enter a judgment that states “The decision of the Commissioner is 

affirmed.” The clerk will then close the file.

SO ORDERED on May 10, 2022.

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00220-AW-MJF Document 22 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 1
1

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

All Cases

Case No. 3:19-md-2885

Judge M. Casey Rodgers 

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned counsel hereby enters 

her appearance in this action. Counsel respectfully requests that all 

notices, correspondence, filings and other papers in the Master Docket of MDL 

2885 be served upon her at the email address listed below. 

Dated: March 20, 2023

Respectfully submitted, 

PARAFINCZUK WOLF, P.A. 

/s/ Rachel Lucuara

Rachel Lucuara

Florida Bar: 1010540

5550 Glades Rd., Ste 500

Boca Raton, FL 33431

Tel:(954)678-0263

rlucuara@parawolf.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3702 Filed 03/20/23 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 20th day of March 2023, a true and correct copy of 

the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court and served using 

the CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Rachel Lucuara

Rachel Lucuara

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3702 Filed 03/20/23 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:97-cr-00097-LC Document 106-2 Filed 05/22/98 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:97-cr-00097-LC Document 106-2 Filed 05/22/98 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:97-cr-00097-LC Document 106-2 Filed 05/22/98 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:97-cr-00097-LC Document 106-2 Filed 05/22/98 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:97-cr-00097-LC Document 106-2 Filed 05/22/98 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:97-cr-00097-LC Document 106-2 Filed 05/22/98 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:97-cr-00097-LC Document 106-2 Filed 05/22/98 Page 7 of 7
#### Jamaica Savings Bank, Respondent, v Lincoln Plaza, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Lincoln Plaza Towers Associates et al., Appellants.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 14, 1978 unanimously affirmed on the opinion of Nusbaum, J., at Trial Term. Respondent shall recover of appellants one bill of $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Birns, Fein, Lupiano and Ross, JJ.