UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TRACY BOWEN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CENTURION OF FLORIDA, LLC and 

MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS,

LLC,

Defendants.

________________________/

Case No. __________________

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Tracy Bowen sues Defendants Centurion of Florida, LLC and 

MHM Health Professionals, LLC, and alleges:

Nature of the Action

1. This is an action to remedy unlawful discrimination, a racially 

hostile work environment, and retaliation under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., 

42 U.S.C. § 1981, and Florida Statutes § 760.01, et seq.

Parties

2. At all material times, Plaintiff Tracy Bowen has been a resident 

of Escambia County, Florida. Plaintiff is a member of a protected class 

because of her race (African-American) and because she reported and/or 

opposed unlawful employment practices.

Case 3:20-cv-05823-TKW-EMT Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 1 of 10
2

3. Defendant Centurion of Florida, LLC (“Centurion”) is a Florida

limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State 

of Florida. At all material times, Centurion has been an “employer” as that 

term is used under the applicable laws.

4. Defendant MHM Health Professionals, LLC (“MHMHP”) is a 

foreign limited liability company authorized and doing business in the State 

of Florida. At all material times, MHMHP has been an “employer” as that 

term is used under the applicable laws.

Jurisdiction and Venue

5. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 because 

Plaintiff asserts claims arising under the laws of the United States. 

6. The Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state-law 

claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a) because those claims are so related to the 

federal claims that they form part of the same case or controversy.

7. Venue is proper in this Court because a substantial part of the 

events or omissions giving rise to the claims occurred in this District.

Conditions Precedent

8. All conditions precedent to bringing this action have been 

performed or have occurred.

Case 3:20-cv-05823-TKW-EMT Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 2 of 10
3

Factual Allegations

9. Centurion and MHMHP jointly employed Plaintiff.

10. Plaintiff began her employment with Defendants in April 2018 as 

an Activities Therapist at the Santa Rosa Correctional Institution (“SRCI”) in 

Milton, Florida. In July 2018, she became a Mental Health Counselor after 

she was licensed as a mental health counselor intern.

11. In October 2018, some of Plaintiff’s co-workers and supervisors 

attended a meeting in the Warden’s office at the SRCI to address an incident 

in which a Corrections Officer at the facility had fashioned and displayed a 

noose to an African-American co-worker. 

12. Plaintiff’s co-workers reported during the meeting that they 

considered the Officer’s actions to be racist, that the actions created a racially 

hostile work environment, and that the Officer’s continued presence at the 

facility sent a message that racist acts of intimidation were accepted and 

condoned at the SRCI.

13. In April 2019, one of Plaintiff’s African-American co-workers 

was suspended the day after she reported an incident in which she saw an 

African-American inmate who appeared to have beaten by Corrections 

Officers. Two weeks later, the co-worker was fired. This caused the Mental 

Case 3:20-cv-05823-TKW-EMT Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 3 of 10
4

Health Professionals at the facility to fear that they would be retaliated 

against for reporting misconduct including actual or potential unlawful acts.

14. On several occasions in the following weeks, Plaintiff and her

fellow Mental Health Professionals met with their supervisors and voiced 

their concerns about the racially hostile work environment and their fear of 

being retaliated against for writing mandated incident reports. Plaintiff and 

her co-workers suggested several possible actions that could be taken to 

ameliorate the situation. Defendants responded, however, that little (if 

anything) could be done because the Corrections Officers involved were 

employed by the Florida Department of Corrections and not Defendants.

15. On April 22, 2019, Plaintiff and the other Mental Health 

Professionals attended a meeting with their supervisors and the Warden. 

During this meeting, rather than having their concerns addressed, Plaintiff 

and her co-workers were yelled at, told not to “stir the pot,” and ordered to 

“cease and desist” discussing the noose incident in the workplace.

16. On or about July 4, 2019, one of Plaintiff’s African-American coworkers was told that a Corrections Officer at the SRCI had been overheard 

talking about locking her in a room with inmates and letting the inmates

“beat the shit out of” her. After viewing the facility’s videotapes and 

confirming that the allegations were true, the co-worker met with her 

Case 3:20-cv-05823-TKW-EMT Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 4 of 10
5

department supervisor, reported that she was concerned for her safety and 

that of her co-workers, and requested to meet with the Warden to discuss her 

concerns.

17. At the request of some of the Mental Health Professionals, 

another meeting was held with their supervisors on July 11, 2019. 

18. At the meeting, Plaintiff and her fellow Mental Health 

Professionals complained that the Corrections Officers who had engaged in 

racist and threatening behavior were still working at the facility, and that

Defendants had failed to provide a safe, non-hostile work environment. 

When Defendants again indicated that little (if anything) could be done, it 

was agreed that Plaintiff and her co-workers would take a “mental health 

day.”

19. When they attempted to return to work on July 12, 2019, Plaintiff 

and the other Mental Health Professionals who had attended the meeting on 

July 11 were told that their hostile work environment complaints were being 

investigated and that they would not be permitted to return until the 

investigation was complete. They were later advised that they had been 

suspended without pay for “abandoning” their patients.

Case 3:20-cv-05823-TKW-EMT Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 5 of 10
6

20. Defendants later advised Plaintiff that she could transfer to 

another correctional facility that was about two hours away from her home, 

but they refused to put the offer in writing. 

21. By email dated August 6, 2019, Plaintiff advised Defendants that 

she was resigning due to their failure to provide her with a safe work 

environment free from retaliation and hostility.

COUNT 1

RACE DISCRIMINATION

22. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 21 above.

23. Plaintiff has been discriminated against because of her race in 

that she was treated differently than similarly situated non-AfricanAmerican employees based, at least in part, on her race. 

24. Defendants are liable for the differential treatment towards 

Plaintiff because they controlled the actions and inactions of the persons 

making decisions affecting Plaintiff or they knew or should have known 

about those actions or inactions and failed to take prompt and adequate 

remedial action or took no action at all to prevent the abuses of Plaintiff.

25. Defendants also knowingly condoned and ratified the differential 

treatment of Plaintiff because they allowed and/or participated in the 

differential treatment.

Case 3:20-cv-05823-TKW-EMT Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 6 of 10
7

26. The discrimination complained of herein affected a term,

condition, or privilege of Plaintiff’s employment with Defendants and 

constitutes adverse employment action.

27. Defendants’ acts and omissions constitute intentional 

discrimination and unlawful employment practices based on race, in 

violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., and Florida Statutes 

§ 760.01, et seq.

28. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ conduct 

described above, Plaintiff has suffered emotional distress, mental pain and 

suffering, past and future pecuniary losses, inconvenience, mental anguish, 

loss of enjoyment of life and other non-pecuniary losses. These damages 

have occurred in the past, are permanent and continuing. Plaintiff is entitled 

to injunctive relief.

29. Plaintiff is entitled to recover her attorney’s fees and costs under 

42 U.S.C. § 1988, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k), and Florida Statutes § 760.11(5).

COUNT 2

HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT

30. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 21 above.

31. Plaintiff was subjected to unwelcome harassment based, at least 

in part, on her race and/or because she had complained about or opposed 

race discrimination. 

Case 3:20-cv-05823-TKW-EMT Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 7 of 10
8

32. The harassment was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the 

terms and conditions of Plaintiff’s employment and create an abusive 

working environment.

33. Defendants are liable for the harassment because they controlled 

the actions and inactions of the persons making decisions affecting Plaintiff 

or they knew or should have known about those actions or inactions and 

failed to take prompt and adequate remedial action.

34. Defendants also knowingly condoned and ratified the hostile 

work environment because they participated in and/or allowed it to occur.

35. Defendants’ knowing allowance and ratification of the actions 

and inactions created, perpetuated, and facilitated an abusive and offensive 

work environment under the law.

36. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ conduct 

described above, Plaintiff has suffered emotional distress, mental pain and 

suffering, past and future pecuniary losses, inconvenience, mental anguish, 

loss of enjoyment of life and other non-pecuniary losses. These damages 

have occurred in the past, are permanent and continuing. Plaintiff is entitled 

to injunctive relief.

37. Plaintiff is entitled to recover her attorney’s fees and costs under 

42 U.S.C. § 1988, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k), and Florida Statutes § 760.11(5).

Case 3:20-cv-05823-TKW-EMT Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 8 of 10
9

COUNT 3

RETALIATION

38. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 21 above.

39. Plaintiff reported and/or opposed unlawful employment 

practices during her employment with Defendants.

40. Defendants retaliated against Plaintiff for reporting and/or 

opposing the unlawful employment practices.

41. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ acts and 

omissions, Plaintiff has suffered emotional distress, mental pain and 

suffering, past and future pecuniary losses, inconvenience, mental anguish, 

loss of enjoyment of life and other non-pecuniary losses. These damages 

have occurred in the past, are permanent and continuing. Plaintiff is entitled 

to injunctive relief.

42. Plaintiff is entitled to recover her attorney’s fees and costs under 

42 U.S.C. § 1988, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k), and Florida Statutes § 760.11(5).

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the Court enter judgment in her

favor and against Defendants awarding compensatory damages, punitive 

damages, pre- and post-judgment interest, attorney’s fees, and costs;

granting equitable relief mandating Defendants’ obedience to the laws 

enumerated above and permanently enjoining Defendants from future 

Case 3:20-cv-05823-TKW-EMT Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 9 of 10
10

violations of those laws; and granting such other and further relief as the

Court deems just and appropriate.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all matters so triable.

DATED: September 15, 2020

TEIN MALONE PLLC

/s/ Gaye L. Huxoll

Gaye L. Huxoll

Florida Bar No. 149497

ghuxoll@teinmalone.com

(305) 442-1101

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 3:20-cv-05823-TKW-EMT Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 10 of 10