alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 73078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29982]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0761; FRL-8854-7]


FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; Notice of Change of Meeting 
Location

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency is issuing this notice to change the meeting 
location of the December 7, 2010 Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and 
Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel (FIFRA SAP) meeting. The 
FIFRA SAP is meeting to consider and review scientific issues 
associated with pesticide exposure models and climate change.

DATES: The meeting will be held on December 7, 2010, from 8:30 a.m. to 
approximately 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hyatt Regency, Tidewater 
Room Hyatt Regency Crystal City at Reagan National Airport, 2799 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Jenkins, DFO, Office of Science 
Coordination and Policy (7201M), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 
(202) 564-3327; fax number: (202) 564-8382; e-mail address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f69c93989d9f9885d890849392b6938697d8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b7ddd2d9dcded9c499d1c5d2d3f7d2c7d699d0d8c1">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All other information provided in the 
September 29, 2010 (75 FR 60110) Federal Register notice remains 
unchanged.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: November 23, 2010.
Frank Sanders,
Director, Office of Science Coordination and Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-29982 Filed 11-23-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
ATENCIÓN DE SALUD

PARA LAS VETERANAS

Serviste, mereces 

la mejor atención

 que hay

REQUSITOS GENERALES 

•	 2 años de servicio activo

•	 Misiones realizadas en Operación

Enduring Freedom u Operación Iraqi

Freedom (OEF/OIF)

•	 Traumas sexuales militares

Cada veterana es única. Ponte en

contacto con el centro de VA más

próximo o llama al 1 800 827-1000

para recibir ayuda en la determinación

de tu situación particular.

PARA MAYOR INFORMACIÓN 

Llama a la línea de ayuda para informarte 

sobre los beneficios de salud de VA 

(VA Health Benefits Call Center) 

1877222VETS (18772228387) 

Marca el cero y pide hablar con 

un intérprete

Veterans Benefits Administration

1-800-827-1000

www.vba.va.gov

Women Veterans Health 

Strategic Health Care Group

www.publichealth.va.gov/womenshealth

PROMESA CUMPLIDA

El WomenVeterans Health Strategic 

Health Care Group o Grupo de 

Atención Estratégica a la Salud 

de las Veteranas promueve la salud, 

el bienestar y la dignidad de las 

Veteranas y su familia garantizando 

el acceso equitativo a una atención 

en salud oportuna y de alta calidad 

que responde a las necesidades 

particulares de la mujer.

www.publichealth.va.gov/womenshealth

Women Veterans Health Strategic 

Health Care Group (13E)

Department of Veterans Affairs

Veterans Health Administration

810 Vermont Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20420

P96360 IB 10-306

March 2010
todos los centros de va están 

comprometidos a satisfacer las nece-

sidades particulares de las veteranas 

prestando asistencia médica de la más 

alta calidad a toda mujer y a la vez 

ofreciéndole la privacidad, la dignidad y 

la atención a las necesidades específicas 

del género que ella merece. Integra el 

personal de planta del centro de VA de 

tu localidad una mujer responsable del 

Programa de las Veteranas quien se 

encuentra a tu entera disposición para 

ayudarte a conseguir acceso oportuno a 

la atención de salud que requieres.

SALUD GENERAL 

Atención primaria de salud 

Atención ginecológica 

Atención de maternidad 

Métodos anticonceptivos

Evaluación y tratamiento de la infertilidad 

Evaluación y tratamiento de la menopausia 

Examen y tratamiento de la osteoporosis 

Examen de cáncer y mamografías 

Bienestar y régimen de vida saludable

Nutrición y control de peso 

Programa para dejar de fumar 

SALUD MENTAL 

Control de la depresión, la ansiedad y el estrés 

Adaptación post-misión 

Orientación, consejería y tratamiento para: 

•	Trauma sexual militar

•	Problemas con la crianzao el cuidado

de los niños

•	Violenciay abuso

•	Dependencia del alcoholy las drogas

PROGRAMAS ESPECIALES 

Rehabilitación vocacional 

Oportunidades educativas 

Enlaces con orientación sobre puestos de 

trabajo y las carreras profesionales

Servicios para los veteranos que no tienen 

dónde vivir

Programa de control de obesidad para los 

veteranos, conocido por sus siglas en inglés 

MOVE! – (Managing Obesity inVeterans 

Everywhere)

Nuestra visión es 

brindar atención 

de la más alta 

calidad a todas las 

veteranas.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of Blue Dolphin
Energy Company (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December
31, 2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, I, Gregory W. Starks, Vice President, Treasurer (Principal
Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Gregory W. Starks
-------------------------
Gregory W. Starks
Treasurer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

August 18, 2005
MEMORANDUM

To : File From : Tab Tesnau Subject : Meeting with the Treated Wood Council Date : December 13, 2012

On December 13, 2012, EPA met with representatives from the Treated W ood Council to discuss how treated wood is characterized within the context of the December 2011 Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials (NHSM) proposed rule. Th e representatives for the Treated Wood Council discussed a comparison of treated wood to re sinated wood and how treated wood might be a potential candidate for a categor ical determination as discussed in the December 2011 proposed rule. They also discussed a life- cycle assessment of treated wood.

The Agency asked clarifying questions. Material s distributed during the meeting are attached.

Invitees :

Treated Wood Council Representatives included the following:

Jeff Miller, Treated Wood Council Jane Luxton, Pepper Hamilton for Treated Wood Council Patrick Kirkman, Stella-Jones Corp Jeff Lloyd, Nisus Corp. Bill Sheeler, Zwicky Processing and Recycling

EPA Representatives included the following: Lisa Feldt James Berlow Matt Straus Suzanne Rudzinski Sandra Connors George Faison Kenneth Dixon
Case 3:94-cr-03010-RV Document 39 Filed 12/16/05 Page 1 of 1
#### Moosa Ebrahimian, Respondent, v Champion Leather Corp. Appellant.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 14, 1979, as modified by order dated March 21, 1979, denying defendant’s motion to vacate default judgment, is unanimously reversed, in the exercise of discretion, and said default judgment is vacated and defendant is granted leave to serve its verified answer contained in the record on appeal on condition that within 20 days after service of the order entered hereon, and simultaneously with the service of its answer, defendant shall pay to plaintiff $250 in costs in addition to the costs and disbursements of this appeal; and should such payment of costs not be made as specified, the order is affirmed, with costs. While defendant’s affidavit of merits leaves much to be desired, the default arises from service of an answer two days late. We are reluctant to deprive defendant of its opportunity to defend the case and to impose so severe a penalty as a default judgment for $34,576 for so minor a default. On the other hand, particularly in view of the conclusory nature of the showing of merits by defendant, some sanction for the default is appropriate. Our present determination is no indication of our views as to whether defendant has presented an issue of fact sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment if made. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Birns, Markewich, Lupiano and Silverman, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Robert D’Agostino et al., Respondents, v. Village Clerk of the Village of Tuckahoe et al., Appellants.

Order of the *849Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 17, 1967, granting petitioners’ application and declaring valid a certain independent nominating petition of the Fusion party which designated certain candidates for office in the Village of Tuckahoe in the village election to be held on March 21, 1967, affirmed, without costs. The court does not reach the question of the validity of sheets numbered 11 and 12 of the nominating petition, which contain pasted overlays plus attachments of separate parts of sheets to constitute a single numbered sheet, containing addresses and other pertinent information. We find that sheets 1 through 10 of the petition, inclusive, are valid, are in substantial compliance with the requirements of section 138 of the Election Law and contain a sufficient number of signatures. While these sheets (1 through 10) contain stapling and pasting of separate parts of sheets, the court is agreed that in this case, because (1) there was a concession that there was no proof of fraud, (2) there is no claim or showing of any fraud and (3) the chairman of the Fusion party Committee testified at the hearing at Special Term, without contradiction, that these sheets were sent out the gathering of signatures in the form now objected to, the petition should not be rejected. We therefore concur in the decision of the learned Justice at Special Term. Nevertheless, we do not approve generally of the use of nominating petition sheets in the form here presented. Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Rabin and Munder, JJ., concur.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43099

STATE OF IDAHO
,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

JERMAIN SHERELL WILEY
,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 539

Filed: May 18, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
OPINION AND SHALL NOT
BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho,
Fremont County. Hon. Gregory W. Moeller , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and determinate fifteen

- year sentence for attempted first degree murder, affirmed

.

Nevin , Benjamin, McKay & Bartlett, LLP; Deborah A. Whipple , Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for r espondent.

________________________________________________
Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Jermain Sherell Wiley pled guilty to attempted first degree murder . I.C. § 18

- 4001

. In

exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed including an allegation that he

was a persistent violator. The district court sentenced Wiley to a determinate fifteen

- year term

. Wiley appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the re asonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. T

oohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having revi ewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Wiley ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
§ 4284.1007 Eligibility for grant assistance. Non-profit and for-profit corporations, institutions of higher learning and other entities, including a consortium where a lead entity has been designated and agrees to act as funding agent, that meet the following requirements are eligible for grant assistance: ( a ) The entity— ( 1 ) Has provided services similar to those listed for Producer Services; or
( 2 ) Demonstrates the capability of providing Producer Services;
( b ) The application includes a plan that meets the requirements of § 4284.1010(c)(5)(iv) that also outlines— ( 1 ) The support for the entity in the agricultural community;
( 2 ) The technical and other expertise of the entity; and
( 3 ) The goals of the entity for increasing and improving the ability of local agricultural producers to develop markets and processes for Value-Added agricultural commodities or products;
( c ) The entity demonstrates that adequate resources (in cash or in kind) are available, or have been committed to be made available to the entity, to increase and improve the ability of local agricultural producers to develop markets and processes for Value-Added agricultural commodities or products; and
( d ) The proposed Center has a Qualified Board of Directors.
Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RANDY A. HART,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5733-MCR-EMT

MARK INCH,

Defendant.

__________________________/

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on February 

8, 2021. ECF No. 16. Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

16) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

Case 3:20-cv-05733-MCR-EMT Document 18 Filed 03/29/21 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No. 3:20cv5733-MCR-EMT

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court.

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close 

this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of March 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05733-MCR-EMT Document 18 Filed 03/29/21 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No. 3:20cv5733-MCR-EMT

Case 3:20-cv-05733-MCR-EMT Document 18 Filed 03/29/21 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1994
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERNCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMTENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997             MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997             JUN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997             MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                         561,511                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  292,237                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,825)                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    264,700                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,133,009                       0
<PP&E>                                         672,278                   8,004
<DEPRECIATION>                               (654,957)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,196,622                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          142,714                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     2,383,385                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,329,477)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,196,622                       0
<SALES>                                      2,490,919               2,683,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,490,919               2,683,188
<CGS>                                        1,569,654               1,858,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,569,654               1,858,944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               855,463                 804,459
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 89,213                 356,748
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800                     800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             88,413                  35,948
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    88,413                  35,948
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06                    0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06                    0.03
        

</TABLE>
11.403 Supplies or services.

(a) The contracting officer may express contract delivery or performance schedules in terms of-

(1) Specific calendar dates;

(2) Specific periods from the date of the contract; i.e., from the date of award or acceptance by the

Government, or from the date shown as the effective date of the contract;

(3) Specific periods from the date of receipt by the contractor of the notice of award or acceptance

by the Government (including notice by receipt of contract document executed by the Government);

or

(4) Specific time for delivery after receipt by the contractor of each individual order issued under the

contract, as in indefinite delivery type contracts and GSA schedules.

(b) The time specified for contract performance should not be curtailed to the prejudice of the

contractor because of delay by the Government in giving notice of award.

(c) If the delivery schedule is based on the date of the contract, the contracting officer shall mail or

otherwise furnish to the contractor the contract, notice of award, acceptance of proposal, or other

contract document not later than the date of the contract.

(d) If the delivery schedule is based on the date the contractor receives the notice of award, or if the

delivery schedule is expressed in terms of specific calendar dates on the assumption that the notice

of award will be received by a specified date, the contracting officer shall send the contract, notice

of award, acceptance of proposal, or other contract document by certified mail, return receipt

requested, or by any other method that will provide evidence of the date of receipt.

(e) In invitations for bids, if the delivery schedule is based on the date of the contract, and a bid

offers delivery based on the date the contractor receives the contract or notice of award, the

contracting officer shall evaluate the bid by adding 5 calendar days (as representing the normal time

for arrival through ordinary mail). If the contract or notice of award will be transmitted

electronically, (1) the solicitation shall so state; and (2) the contracting officer shall evaluate delivery

schedule based on the date of contract receipt or notice of award, by adding oneworking day. (The

term "working day" excludes weekends and U.S. Federal holidays.) If the offered delivery date

computed with mailing or transmittal time is later than the delivery date required by the invitation

for bids, the bid shall be considered nonresponsive and rejected. If award is made, the delivery date

will be the number of days offered in the bid after the contractor actually receives the notice of

award.

Parent topic: Subpart 11.4 - Delivery or Performance Schedules
§ 301.51-6 Compliance agreements and cancellation. ( a ) Persons engaged in growing, handling, or moving regulated articles interstate may enter into a compliance agreement[1] if such persons review with an inspector each stipulation of the compliance agreement. Any person who enters into a compliance agreement with APHIS must agree to comply with the provisions of this subpart and any conditions imposed under this subpart.
( b ) Any compliance agreement may be canceled orally or in writing by an inspector whenever the inspector determines that the person who has entered into the compliance agreement has not complied with this subpart or any conditions imposed under this subpart. If the cancellation is oral, the cancellation will become effective immediately, and the cancellation and the reasons for the cancellation will be confirmed in writing as soon as circumstances permit. Any person whose compliance agreement has been cancelled may appeal the decision in writing to the Administrator within 10 days after receiving the written cancellation notice. The appeal must state all of the facts and reasons that the person wants the Administrator to consider in deciding the appeal. A hearing may be held to resolve a conflict as to any material fact. Rules of practice for the hearing will be adopted by the Administrator. As soon as practicable, the Administrator will grant or deny the appeal, in writing, stating the reasons for the decision.
[62 FR 10416, Mar. 7, 1997, as amended at 87 FR 80006, Dec. 29, 2022] Footnotes -
301.51-6
[1] Compliance agreements may be initiated by contacting a local office of APHIS. The addresses and telephone numbers of local offices are listed in local telephone directories and may also be obtained from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Domestic and Emergency Operations, 4700 River Road Unit 134, Riverdale, Maryland 20737-1236.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2005-1106.

#### Campbell v. TES Franchising, LLC.

Butler App. No. CA2004-06-151, 2005-Ohio-2271. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Butler County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.