Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 227 / Friday, November 26, 2010 / Notices 72839 

importation of certain gaming and 

entertainment consoles, related 

software, and components thereof. The 

complaint names as respondent 

Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, WA. 

The complainant, proposed 

respondents, other interested parties, 

and members of the public are invited 

to file comments, not to exceed five 

pages in length, on any public interest 

issues raised by the complaint. 

Comments should address whether 

issuance of an exclusion order and/or a 

cease and desist order in this 

investigation would negatively affect the 

public health and welfare in the United 

States, competitive conditions in the 

United States economy, the production 

of like or directly competitive articles in 

the United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the orders are used 

in the United States; 

(ii) Identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the potential orders; 

(iii) Indicate the extent to which like 

or directly competitive articles are 

produced in the United States or are 

otherwise available in the United States, 

with respect to the articles potentially 

subject to the orders; and 

(iv) Indicate whether Complainant, 

Complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to an exclusion order 

and a cease and desist order within a 

commercially reasonable time. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business, five 

business days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. There will be further 

opportunities for comment on the 

public interest after the issuance of any 

final initial determination in this 

investigation. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document and 12 

true copies thereof on or before the 

deadlines stated above with the Office 

of the Secretary. Submissions should 

refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 

2770’’) in a prominent place on the 

cover page and/or the first page. The 

Commission’s rules authorize filing 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means only to the 

extent permitted by section 201.8 of the 

rules (see Handbook for Electronic 

Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ 

secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ 

documents/ 

handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). 

Persons with questions regarding 

electronic filing should contact the 

Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All nonconfidential 

written submissions will be available for 

public inspection at the Office of the 

Secretary. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 

210.50(a)(4)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 22, 2010. 

William R. Bishop, 

Acting Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29736 Filed 11–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[USITC SE–10–032] 

Government in the Sunshine Act 

Meeting Notice 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United 

States International Trade Commission. 

TIME AND DATE: December 3, 2010 at 11 

a.m. 

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 

(202) 205–2000. 

STATUS: Open to the public. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1. Agendas for future meetings: none. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701–TA–476 and 

731–TA–1179 (Preliminary). 

(Multilayered Wood Flooring from 

China). The Commission is currently 

scheduled to transmit its determinations 

to the Secretary of Commerce on or 

before December 6, 2010; 

Commissioners’ opinions are currently 

scheduled to be transmitted to the 

Secretary of Commerce on or before 

December 13, 2010. 

5. Vote in Inv. No. 731–TA–282 

(Third Review)(Petroleum Wax Candles 

from China). The Commission is 

currently scheduled to transmit its 

determination and Commissioners’ 

opinions to the Secretary of Commerce 

on or before December 16, 2010. 

6. Outstanding action jackets: None. 

In accordance with Commission 

policy, subject matter listed above, not 

disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 

may be carried over to the agenda of the 

following meeting. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 22, 2010. 

William R. Bishop, 

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29875 Filed 11–23–10; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

(CERCLA) 

Notice is hereby given that on 

November 19, 2010, a proposed Consent 

Decree in The United States of America, 

the Coeur d’Alene Tribe, and the State 

of Idaho v. Atlantic Richfield Company, 

Civ. No. 10–578–EJL, was lodged with 

the United States District Court for the 

District of Idaho. 

Plaintiffs the United States, the Tribe 

and the State filed a complaint 

concurrently with the Consent Decree 

alleging that Defendant Atlantic 

Richfield Company is liable pursuant to 

Section 107(a)(2) of CERCLA for 

response costs incurred and to be 

incurred by the United States and the 

State and for natural resources damages 

in connection with releases of 

hazardous substances at or from 

Operable Unit 3 of the Bunker Hill 

Mining and Metallurgical Complex 

Superfund Site (Bunker Hill Site) in 

northern Idaho. The Complaint alleges 

Defendant, and its predecessor The 

Anaconda Company, owned and/or 

operated mining or milling related 

facilities within Operable Unit 3. The 

proposed Consent Decree grants the 

Defendant a covenant not to sue for 

response costs, as well as natural 

resource damages, in connection with 

the Bunker Hill Site. The United States 

Environmental Protection Agency 

incurred response costs, and the United 

States Department of the Interior, the 

United States Department of 

Agriculture, the Tribe and the State are 

trustees of injured natural resources. 

The settlement requires the Defendant 

to pay a total of $6.75 million 

($5,062,500 will be paid to EPA for 

response costs and $1,687,500 will be 

paid to the natural resource trustees for 

natural resources damages). 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
72840 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 227 / Friday, November 26, 2010 / Notices 

For thirty (30) days after the date of 

this publication, the Department of 

Justice will receive comments relating to 

the Consent Decree. Comments should 

be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and either e-mailed 

to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. In either case, the 

comments should refer to U.S., et al. v. 

Atlantic Richfield Company., Civ No. 

10–578–EJL and D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3– 

128/9. 

During the comment period, the 

Consent Decree may be examined on the 

following Department of Justice Web 

site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please enclose a check 

in the amount of $6.25 (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

United States Treasury or, if by e-mail 

or fax, forward a check in that amount 

to the Consent Decree Library at the 

stated address. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29716 Filed 11–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Office of Justice Programs 

[OMB Number 1121–0283] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Reinstatement, With Change 

of a Previously Approved Collection 

for Which Approval Has Expired, 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: 30-day notice of information 

Collection under review: State Court 

Organization 2009. 

The Department of Justice, Office of 

Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice 

Statistics, will be submitting the 

following information collection request 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed 

information collection is published to 

obtain comments from the public and 

affected agencies. The proposed 

information collection was previously 

published in the Federal Register 

Volume 75, Number 186, pages 59293– 

59294, on September 27, 2010, allowing 

for a 60-day public comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

an additional 30 days for public 

comment until December 27, 2010. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to the Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–5806. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the pubic and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

function of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

(1) Type of information collection: 

Reinstatement, with change, of a 

previously approved collection for 

which OMB approval has expired, State 

Court Organization, 2009. 

(2) The title of the form/collection: 

State Court Organization, 2009 or SCO 

2009. 

(3) The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

The form label is SCO–2009, Bureau of 

Justice Statistics, Office of Justice 

Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. 

(4) Affected Public Who Will be Asked 

or Required to Respond, as well as a 

Brief Abstract: State trial and appellate 

courts and state administrative court 

offices. Abstract: State Court 

Organization 2009 will focus on the 

organizational structure of state courts 

throughout the country. Emphasis will 

be placed on collecting information 

pertaining to the number of trial and 

appellate court judges, the selection of 

judicial officers, the governance of the 

judicial branch, the funding and budgets 

of state courts, appellate and trial court 

staffing, the use of juries, and 

sentencing procedures. Moreover, 

information will be collected on the 

utilization of information technology 

systems in state courts. All data 

collected will be accurate as of 

December 2009. 

(5) An Estimate of the Total Number 

of Respondents and the Amount of Time 

Estimated for an Average Respondent to 

Respond: The State Court Organization 

(SCO) data collection forms will be sent 

to each of the nation’s 56 court systems 

(those for the 50 states, the District of 

Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S 

territories including American Samoa, 

Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and 

the Virgin Islands). The data collection 

instruments will be in the form of 

spreadsheets that will basically mirror 

the electronic and PDF tables produced 

for the SCO report. There are a total of 

62 spreadsheets that the respondents 

will be asked to complete for their 

individual states or courts. Consistent 

with past data collections, recurring 

tables will be populated with data 

previously reported in prior SCO 

publications. Previous SCO surveys, 

along with pretests of the current data 

collection spreadsheet, have shown that 

it should take an estimated half an hour 

for the 56 court systems to review and 

revise each pre-populated spreadsheet. 

Since 38 of the 62 spreadsheets hail 

from prior SCO surveys, the total 

burden hours to review, revise, and 

update the pre-populated SCO 

spreadsheets for each of the court 

systems should be about 19 hours (38 

spreadsheets * half an hour per 

spreadsheet = 19 hours per state or U.S. 

territory). For new spreadsheets, no 

historical data will be available, and the 

data collection forms will be blank. 

Pretests have shown that it should take 

an hour to provide the requested 

information for each data collection 

spreadsheet. Since 24 of the 62 

spreadsheets involve the collection of 

new SCO data, the total burden hours to 

collect the requested data for each court 

systems should be about 24 hours (24 

spreadsheets * one hour per spreadsheet 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES