alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The State ex rel. Eldridge, Appellant, *v.*Devery, Acting Admr., et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Eldridge v. Devery*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 122.]

(No. 97-583

Submitted July 15, 1998

Decided September 16, 1998.)

*123
      *Mark B. Weisser,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *William D. Haders,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Resnick, J., dissents.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1997
<CASH>                                           2,874
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                       682
<INVENTORY>                                        891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,421
<PP&E>                                         179,613
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,860
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,559
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,894
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               256,688
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  250,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,783
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,626
<INCOME-TAX>                                       721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                905
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       766
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
§ 3550.108 Security requirements (loans only). When the total section 504 indebtedness is $7,500 or more, the property will be secured by a mortgage on the property, leasehold interest, or land purchase contract. ( a ) RHS does not require a first lien position, but the total of all debts on the secured property may not exceed the value of the security, except by the amount of any required contributions to an escrow account for taxes and insurance and any required appraisal fee.
( b ) Title clearance and the use of legal services generally must be conducted in accordance with 7 CFR part 1927, subpart B. These requirements need not be followed for: ( 1 ) Loans where the total section 504 indebtedness does not exceed an amount determined by the Agency based on factors such as average costs for title insurance and closing agents compared to average housing repair costs, but no greater than twenty percent of the national average area loan limit.
( 2 ) Subsequent loans made for minimal essential repairs necessary to protect the Government's interest.
[61 FR 59779, Nov. 22, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 78331, Dec. 24, 2002; 87 FR 6772, Feb. 7, 2022]
|  | Safe Drinking Water Information System / State Version             Recent Additions | Contact Us | Print 							Version 							Search: 							EPA Home > 					Water > 					Ground Water & Drinking Water >					Data & Databases > 					SDWIS/STATE>                     About SDWIS/STATE |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Safe Drinking         Water Information System/STATE Version United States |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Terra Energy Resources, Ltd. on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Catherine Balloqui, President and Principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  April 15, 2009  /S/Catherine Balloqui Catherine Balloqui President, Secretary, Treasurer, 
Director, and Chief Financial Officer 
and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
Peter Robson Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 SUN hydraulics corporation 
 1500 COUNTY LINE ROAD · P.O. BOX 3377 
 SARASOTA, FL 33578 
 TELEPHONE: 813/355-2983 
 April 22, 1981 
 Mr. Peter Robson 
 15 Rose Croft 
 Kenilworth, Warwickshire 
 England 
 Dear Peter: 
 This letter is
a confirmation of an employment agreement between Sun Hydraulics Corporation (“Sun”) and Peter Robson (“Robson”) reached in our phone conversation of April 21, 1981, as follows: 
  

	I.	General Conditions: 

  

	 	a.	Robson will give notice to his present employer effective May 1, 1981. Sun recognizes that Robson has a six-month termination clause and may not be released from his existing
contract for six months. 

  

	 	b.	Employment will begin with a wholly owned subsidiary of Sun as soon as Robson is released from his present contract. 

  

	 	c.	Sun will review Robson’s salary on November 1, 1981, without regard to the actual date employment begins. 

  

	 	d.	This contract may be terminated by either party upon giving six months’ notice in writing to the other party. 

  

	II.	Remuneration: 

  

	 	a.	Sun will pay Robson a beginning salary of £ 10,000 per year. 

  

	 	b.	Sun will pay for medical insurance supplement equal to Bupacare’s family coverage – National Scale. 

  

	 	c.	Sun will pay a retirement supplement equal to ten per cent (10%) of Robson’s base salary. Robson will choose a private plan approved by the Inland Revenue for tax
deferral. 










			
	Mr. Peter Robson	  	April 22, 1981

  


	III.	Transportation and Expenses: 

  

	 	a.	Sun will purchase a Ford Cortina GL or equivalent car for Robson’s use. 

  

	 	b.	Sun will pay Robson’s travel expenses (including car maintenance). 

  

	 	c.	Sun will provide £500 expense advance to Robson. This fund will be replenished from time to time upon presentation by Robson of paid expense vouchers 


 

	IV.	Office Costs: 

  

	 	a.	Sun will provide suitable office space. 

  

	 	b.	Sun will provide necessary secretarial service. 

  

	 	c.	Sun will provide telephone and Telex service. 

 If you
concur with the summary of our agreement, please sign the enclosed copy and return it to me. 
 All of us at Sun Hydraulics are please that
you are joining us and look forward to your visit to Sarasota. 
  

	
	Sun Hydraulics Corporation
	
	 /s/ William F. Clendenin

	William F. Clendenin
	Secretary and Treasurer
	
	 /s/ Robert E. Koski

	Robert E. Koski
	President


  

	
	Accepted:
	
	 /s/ Peter Robson

	Peter Robson

  

 Page 2
COMMUNICATIONS , INC
. 210 4 Joll yRoad , Suit e 200 , Okemos , M l 4886 4 (517 ) 706-000 1 Fa x(517 ) 706-028 2 Februaryl? , 201 2 Docke t Managemen t

Facility [^~ ' U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n |_ J 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e SE. , - o Wes t Buildin g Gran dFloor , Roo mW12-14 0 ~ * Washington , D C 2059 0 n "?^'c:5!:' 1 Ref : Su n Countr y Slo t

Exemptio n - Docke t

Numbe r FA A 2012-008 9 " • : Ladie s an dGentlemen : _ o Su n Country Airline s ha s requeste da n exemptio n fromth e slo t limi t for Ronal dReaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airport (DCA ) t o permi t

th e FA A t o creat e ai r

carrie r slot s durin g certai n limite dhou r

for Su n Country' s use . Th e propose dai r carrier s slot s woul dreplac e tw o slo t exemption s unde r

DO T Orde r

2010-12-1 6 awarde dt o Su n Country
. O n January 6 , 2012 , th e U.S
. Court o f Appeal s vacate dth e DO T Order , an dSu n Country ma y los e it s existin g servic e betwee n DC A an dLansing' s Capita l Regio n Internationa l Airport
. Specifically , Su n Country desire s on e dail y slo t durin g eac ho f

th e 100 0 an d110 0 hours
. Th e propose dexemptio n woul dpermi t Su n Country t o continu e operatin g it s existin g service s an d avoi da n inequitabl e resul t

o f th e Court' s order
. I hav e personall y enjoye dth e Su n Country LAN-DC A flight severa l time s an dca n testif y thi s non-sto p ai r

servic e i s great

fo r th e peopl e o f

Michigan
. Passenger s fro mthroughou t th e stat e trave l t o Lansin g t o fly non-sto p o n Su n Country t o DC A fo r busines s o r

pleasure , savin g million s o f

dollar s i n excessiv e airlin e fare s offere dby othe r carriers
. Th e FA A mad e th e righ t decisio n t o gran t

aDC A slo t

t o Su n Country a s anew , low-fare carrie r t o agreatl y underserve d market
. Th e Su n Country DCA servic e i s essentia l t o th e future economi c growtho f th e Greate r

Lansin g Region
. Th e dail y servic e i s th e onl y larg e aircraf t servic e t o Washingto n Reagan Airport i n th e stat e o f Michiga n outside o f

Detroit
. Prio r

t o Su n Country , th e regiona l communit y ha d requeste dth e introductio n o f thi s servic e fromnumerou s othe r airlin e operator s withou t success . I t i s critica l th e FA A tak e th e necessary step s t o ensur e th e continuatio n o f th e Su n Country slot s a t th e establishe dflight

time s i n support

o f Greate r Lansing' s busines s an deconomi c growth
. You r immediat e approva l o f

thi s exemption , s o that

Su n Country can begi n t o ente r flight schedule s for

sal e for th e balanc e o f

2012 , wil l b e greatl y appreciated
. Sincerel y

Robert Kol t President/CE O RK/m f
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
MARK VII, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 30, 1995 AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 30, 1995
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                             272
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,336
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,254
<PP&E>                                           8,392
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,552
<BONDS>                                            712
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           489  
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,152
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               459,160
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  391,845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,797
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,024
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,290
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,734
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,734
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .95
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 VS CASE NO. 3:98-CR-108-003/LAC

 JEREMY L. HAGAN

FINANCIAL REFERRAL AND ORDER

Regarding refund of funds for: X Fine, Restitution, Filing Fee, Attorney Admission Fee,

 Copy Fee, Bond, Other (Specify) 

By: Jeremy Hagan (Payee)

Address: 201 Dwight Ave.

Pensacola, FL 32507

Receipt Number 4-4822 

Date of Receipt 6/2/08 

Motion: N/A

Explanation: On March 25, 2008 the Clerk’s Office received $893.00 from the Treasury Offset Program

(TOP) for Mr. Hagan’s case. Mr. Hagan has been making payments of $50.00 a month. On June 2,

2008 his $50.00 payment paid his fine in full, as well as, an $8.00 overpayment. Requesting

authorization to refund the $8.00 overpayment, as well as, any other payments from Mr. Hagan for this

case. There may be a timing difference in him receiving notice that the case is paid in full. 

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, Clerk of Court

Prepared by: __s/Philip Detweiler_____________

 Philip Detweiler, Financial Specialist Date: June 6, 2008 

Referred by: Mary Maloy, Deputy Clerk

ORDER OF COURT

It is ORDERED this 6th day of June, 2008, that the Clerk refund the identified funds to the payee.

APPROVED X 

DENIED_________________ s/L.A. Collier 

 LACEY A. COLLIER 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Adopted: 12/03/99

Case 3:98-cr-00108-LC-MD Document 271 Filed 06/06/08 Page 1 of 1
#### § 5001.100 OMB control number.

The report and recordkeeping requirements contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget and have been assigned OMB control number 0572-0155.
#### §§ 3560.355-3560.399 [Reserved]
Sarbanes Oxley Certification


  I, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:

   1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-S3,
(the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted
in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange
Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under
the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item
1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed
in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in
such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Citibank, N.A., as Trustee and Paying Agent; Clayton Fixed Income Services
Inc., as Credit Risk Manager; LaSalle Bank National Association, as
Custodian; U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian; First American
Real Estate Solutions of Texas LP, as sub-contractor for Aurora Loan
Services LLC; Newport Management Corporation, as sub-contractor for
Aurora Loan Services LLC.

     Dated:    March 30, 2007

By : /s/ E. Todd Whittemore
    --------------------------------------------------------
         E. Todd Whittemore
         Executive Vice President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Estes, 7:20cv137

Hacker, 7:20cv131

Keefer, 7:20cv104

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

EXHIBITS ORDER NO. 7

This Order addresses Plaintiffs’ objectionsto the remaining exhibitsidentified 

on Defendants’ fourth priority exhibit list submitted to the Court on April 11, 2021. 

The Court’s rulings are set forth in the attached Exhibit 1. 

SO ORDERED, on this 16th day of April, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00137-MCR-GRJ Document 158 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 1
PUBLIC LAW 106–241—JULY 6, 2000 114 STAT. 495

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3701:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: Vol. 146 (2000):

Mar. 14, considered and passed House.

June 23, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–241

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3118 Washington Boulevard in Arlington, Virginia, as the ‘‘Joseph L. Fisher Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

3118 Washington Boulevard in Arlington, Virginia, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Joseph L. Fisher Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph

L. Fisher Post Office Building’’.

Approved July 6, 2000.

July 6, 2000

[H.R. 3701]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7246

ROY FRANKLIN ECHOLS, Jr.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-01-155-3)

Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 6, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Franklin Echols, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells,

Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Roy Franklin Echols appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Echols v. Angelone, CA-01-155-3 (E.D.

Va. June 18, 2001). We deny Echols’ motion for appointment of

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Investors Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 9, 2008
    /s/ Thomas F. Splaine, Jr.Thomas F. SplaineSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 35
#### § 3200.7 Title.

Title to excess personal property obtained under Part 3200 will automatically pass to the 1890 Land Grant Institutions (including Tuskegee University), 1994 Land Grant Institutions, and the Hispanic-Serving Institutions once USDA receives the SF-122 indicating that the institution has received the property. Note: When competing Federal claims are made for particular items of excess personal property held by agencies other than USDA, with or without payment of reimbursement, GSA will give preference to the Federal agency that will retain title in the Government.