alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the City of Rochester, Appellant, Relative To Acquiring Title To Real Property Required for an Urban Renewal Project, in Front Street and Other Streets, Known as Genesee Crossroads in the City of Rochester. State Street Holding Corporation et al., Respondents.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The findings of the trial court are incomplete and inadequate. The court awarded a stated sum but failed to allocate such amount between land and-buildings. It further failed to reveal what method it used in arriving at its determination. We have previously adverted to similar deficiencies in decisions in condemnation proceedings made in Monroe County Supreme Court (cf. *Matter of City of Rochester [Genesee*Crossroads], 30 A D 2d 1033; *Matter of City of Rochester [Genesee*Crossroads], 29 A D 2d 1045). To avoid the delays incident to a remand of the case for appropriate findings we have assumed the burden of re-evaluating the proof and making additional findings. (Cf. *Shafer Bldg. Corp.*v. *State of New York,*29 A D 2d 832.) If repeated deficiencies by the trial court are continued in future cases we shall remand the matters for adequate findings to supply these deficiencies which the trial courts continue to make despite what we have written in the past. Upon the trial all experts agreed that the economic approach was the proper method of fixing values. We concur and further agree with one of respondents’ appraisers that the land and buildings should be valued as a single unit. We fix land value at $850,000. Gross rental income (estimated) from both buildings is found to be the annual sum of $230,000. Estimated annual expenses and allowances for vacancies is fixed at $55,000 leaving estimated net income of $175,000. We attribute therefrom to the land $51,000 ($850,000 at 6%) leaving the sum of $124,000 attributable to the improvements (including fixtures). This sum we capitalize at 11.5% (the opinion of the several experts ranged between 8.559% and 15%) which produces $1,078,260 (say $1,075,000) as the value of the improvements. These found land and improvement values ($1,075,000 plus $850,000) produce a total of $1,925,000 the value fixed by the trial court. (Appeal from judgment and order of Monroe Trial Term in action for permanent appropriation.) Present — Del Yecchio, J. P., Marsh, Moule, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:95-cr-01019-MP-AK

GREGORY ROBERT ROLAND,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 148, Motion to Continue Revocation Hearing,

filed by Defendant Gregory Roland. Defendant Roland was arrested on January 14, 2008, by the

Levy County Sheriff’s Office. Because he is currently incarcerated at the Levy County Jail,

Defendant states that it would be impossible for him to attend the presently scheduled revocation

hearing. Therefore, Defendant requests that the revocation hearing, currently scheduled for

January 18, 2008, be continued. This request is granted, and the revocation of supervised release

hearing is continued to Thursday, February 28, 2008, at 10:00 a.m.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of January, 2008

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:95-cr-01019-MP-AK Document 149 Filed 01/15/08 Page 1 of 1
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                   INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MICROTECH MEDICAL
                   SYSTEMS, INC.  UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF
                   SEPTEMBER 3 1996 AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF
                   INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
                   QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
                     
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         21,219
<SECURITIES>                                   52,012
<RECEIVABLES>                                  687,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               906,311
<PP&E>                                         713,183
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,934,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          476,963
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       36,403
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,251,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,934,213
<SALES>                                        499,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               499,011
<CGS>                                          412,698
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  707,107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,466
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                351,822
<INCOME-TAX>                                   27,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            324,822
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (25,490)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   299,332
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.0045
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.0042
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-46766, 333-62206, 333-105507, 333-124295, and 333-153370) of our report dated March 31, 2010 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of ANTs software inc. included in the 2009 annual report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1. Our report contains an emphasis of a matter paragraph regarding substantial doubt as to the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.


/s/ Weiser LLP
  New York, NY
 April 20, 2010
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                `--------------

                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-OA16 (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
            other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
            period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
            periodic reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee and Residential Funding Company, LLC.

Date: March 27, 2007


       /s/ Steve Bailey
       -------------------------
       Steve Bailey
       Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Case No. 3:20cr57-MCR

RAY ANTONIO MANUEL, JR.

/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. 

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects 

mentioned in Rule 11, I determined the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary and 

the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of 

the essential elements thereof. I therefore recommend the plea of guilty be 

accepted and the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence imposed 

accordingly.

Dated: January 26, 2021.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00057-MCR Document 31 Filed 01/26/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cr57-MCR

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed 

within twenty-four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different 

deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use 

only and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the 

magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a magistrate 

judge’s findings or recommendations contained in a report and 

recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 

waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court’s order based on 

unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir. 

Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Case 3:20-cr-00057-MCR Document 31 Filed 01/26/21 Page 2 of 2
#### VAN SISE, Appellant, v. VAN SISE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 17, 1906.)

Action by Sarah M. Van Sise against C. Franklyn Van Sise, individually and as executor, etc., of Charles A. Van Sise, deceased.

No opinion. Motion granted.
**UNITED STATES**

 

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

 

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

 

**FORM 10-KSB**

 (Mark One)

x

ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

o

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 000-14542

 

SECURED INVESTMENT RESOURCES FUND, L.P. II

 

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

 

 

|                            |                 |
|---------------------------------|----------------------|
| Delaware                        | 48-0979566           |
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer     |
| incorporation or organization)  | (Identification No.) |

 

199 South Los Robles Avenue, Suite 200

 

Pasadena, California 91101

 

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

Issuer’s telephone number    (626) 585-5920

 

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

 

None

 

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

 

Units of Limited Partnership Interest

 

(Title of class)

 

----
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 1 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 2 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 3 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 4 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 5 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 6 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 7 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 8 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 9 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 10 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 11 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 12 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 13 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 14 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 15 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 16 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 17 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 18 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 19 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 20 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 21 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 22 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 23 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 24 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 25 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 26 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 27 of 28
Case 4:99-cv-00020-WS-WCS Document 33 Filed 12/29/99 Page 28 of 28
###### Editorial Note on Part 3404

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3404 appear at 76 FR 4808, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3404.3 Requests for records.

Requests for records of NIFA under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3) shall be made in accordance with § 1.5 of this title and submitted to the FOIA Coordinator, Information Staff, ARS, REE, USDA, Room 1-2248, Mail Stop 5128, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705-5128; Telephone (301) 504-1640 or (301) 504-1655; TTY-VOICE (301) 504-1743; Facsimile (301) 504-1648; or E-mail *shutchison@ars.usda.gov.* The FOIA Coordinator is delegated authority to make determinations regarding such requests in accordance with § 1.3(c) of this title.

[66 FR 57842, Nov. 19, 2001, as amended at 76 FR 4808, Jan. 27, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                                                   
<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>                          
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
financial  statements  of  News  Communications,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  as of
November  30,  1996  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                   <C>  

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                       DEC-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                         NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                               1,494,887
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4,725,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                         862,615
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     5,700,127
<PP&E>                                               1,387,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                       866,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       9,711,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,554,356
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             80,380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          200,449
<OTHER-SE>                                           4,808,378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         9,711,124
<SALES>                                              18,334,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     18,334,866
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        21,972,383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (177,471)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (3,881,428)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (3,881,428)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (3,881,428)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.48)

 
        

                                     

<PAGE>



</TABLE>
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:96-cr-00021-MP

LORENZO ATKINS,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 71, Motion to Continue Revocation of Supervised

Release Hearing, filed by Lorenzo Atkins. A telephone hearing was held on this matter on

Wednesday, February 15, 2006. Defendant requests the continuance so that defendant's

competency evaluation can be completed. The Government does not object. Accordingly,

defendant's motion is GRANTED. Defendant's revocation hearing is hereby rescheduled for

Wednesday, April 5, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of February, 2006

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:96-cr-00021-MP Document 74 Filed 02/15/06 Page 1 of 1
22.1803 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.222-54, Employment Eligibility Verification, in all solicitations and contracts

that exceed $150,000, except those that—

(a) Are only for work that will be performed outside the United States;

(b) Are for a period of performance of less than 120 days; or

(c) Are only for-

(1) Commercially available off-the-shelf items;

(2) Items that would be COTS items, but for minor modifications (as defined at paragraph (3)(ii) of

the definition of "commercial products" at 2.101);

(3) Items that would be COTS items if they were not bulk cargo; or

(4) Commercial services that are-

(i) Part of the purchase of a COTS item (or an item that would be a COTS item, but for minor

modifications);

(ii) Performed by the COTS provider; and

(iii) Are normally provided for that COTS item.

Parent topic: Subpart 22.18 - Employment Eligibility Verification
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Michael S. Kady, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Quipp, Inc.; and

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
         statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
         to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
         such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
         covered by this report.





MICHAEL S. KADY
Michael S. Kady
Chief Executive Officer

Date:    April 28, 2006
#### Sun SHIN, aka June, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-71196.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 20, 2007.*

Filed Aug. 24, 2007.

Alex C. Park, Esq., Law Offices of Alex C. Park, Santa Clara, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Lindsay L. Chichester, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, KLEINFELD and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing the appeal of the immigration judge’s removal order.

Petitioner claims the immigration judge erred by issuing the removal order without allowing petitioner sufficient time to cure the deficiencies in her application for a “U” Visa. However, the record reflects that petitioner did not seek a continuance, but instead requested the removal order be *459entered. Thus, the BIA did not err in dismissing the appeal.

Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam). This petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.