alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 51.1164 Fairly well colored.

*Fairly well colored* as applied to common oranges and tangelos means that except for an aggregate area of green color which does not exceed the area of a circle 1 inch (25.4 mm) in diameter, the characteristic color predominates over the green color.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ROBERT DONNELL DONALDSON,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent,

AND

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Intervenor.

______________________ 

2013-3097

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. DC300A120619-I-1. 

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Robert Donnell Donaldson moves without opposition 

to reform the caption to designate the Merit Systems 

Protection Board as the respondent. Mr. Donaldson also 

moves to stay briefing. The Department of Homeland 

Case: 13-3097 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 06/19/2013
2 ROBERT DONALDSON v. MSPB

Security opposes. The Department of Homeland Security 

moves unopposed for leave to intervene.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board’s decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The 

employing agency is designated as the respondent when the 

Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the 

Board dismissed Mr. Donaldson’s petition for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this 

petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

1) The motion to reform the caption with the Board 

as respondent is granted.

2) The motion to intervene is granted. The revised 

official caption is reflected above.

3) The motion to stay is denied. Mr. Donaldson’s 

opening brief is due within 30 days of the filing of this 

order.

 FOR THE COURT

 

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk

s25

Case: 13-3097 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 06/19/2013
#### § 3560.301 General.

This subpart contains requirements for the financial management of Agency-financed multi-family housing (MFH) projects, including accounts, budgets, and reports. Financial management systems and procedures must cover all housing operations and provide adequate documentation to ensure that program objectives are met.

[82 FR 49285, Oct. 25, 2017]
ply, disappearance, and price, U.S., 1980/81-2009/10

Supply Disappearance Price

Ending Crude,

duction Imports Total Domestic Exports Total stocks Decatur

------------------- Million pounds -------------------- Cents/lb.

1,270 0 12,480 9,113 1,631 10,744 1,736 22.730,979 0 12,716 9,536 2,077 11,613 1,103 18.952,040 0 13,143 9,857 2,025 11,882 1,261 20.620,863 0 12,124 9,579 1,824 11,403 721 30.551,468 20 12,209 9,916 1,660 11,576 632 29.521,617 8 12,257 10,054 1,257 11,311 947 18.022,783 15 13,745 10,833 1,187 12,020 1,725 15.362,975 194 14,893 10,927 1,874 12,801 2,092 22.671,737 138 13,967 10,591 1,661 12,252 1,715 21.093,004 22 14,741 12,082 1,353 13,435 1,305 22.283,408 17 14,730 12,136 808 12,944 1,786 20.984,345 1 16,132 12,248 1,644 13,892 2,239 19.133,778 10 16,028 13,012 1,461 14,473 1,555 21.243,951 68 15,574 12,940 1,531 14,471 1,103 26.965,613 17 16,733 12,914 2,683 15,597 1,137 27.515,240 95 16,472 13,465 992 14,457 2,015 24.705,752 53 17,821 14,267 2,033 16,300 1,520 22.518,143 60 19,723 15,262 3,079 18,341 1,382 25.83

8,078 83 19,543 15,652 2,372 18,024 1,520 19.80

7,825 83 19,427 16,059 1,375 17,434 1,993 15.59

8,420 73 20,486 16,318 1,401 17,719 2,767 14.098,898 46 21,711 16,833 2,519 19,352 2,359 16.468,430 46 20,835 17,081 2,263 19,344 1,491 22.047,080 306 18,877 16,866 936 17,802 1,076 29.979,360 26 20,462 17,439 1,324 18,763 1,699 23.010,387 35 22,122 17,959 1,153 19,112 3,010 23.410,489 37 23,536 18,574 1,877 20,451 3,085 31.020,580 65 23,730 18,335 2,911 21,246 2,485 52.038,746 90 21,321 16,385 2,193 18,578 2,742 32.16

9,270 75 22,087 16,200 3,250 19,450 2,637 33.5-36.5

s , Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA and Global Agricultural Trade System, Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA and 

32

Oil Crops Yearbook/OCS-2010/March 2010

Economic Research Service, USDA
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.1610 Effect of prepayment or early redemption of Leverage on a Trust Certificate. ( a ) The rights, if any, of a RBIC to prepay any Debenture is established by the terms of such security, and no such right is created or denied by the regulations in this part.
( b ) The Agency's rights to purchase or prepay any Debenture without premium are established by the terms of the Guaranty Agreement relating to the Debenture.
( c ) Any prepayment of a Debenture pursuant to the terms of the Guaranty Agreement relating to such security shall reduce the Agency's guarantee of timely payment of principal and interest on a TC in proportion to the amount of principal that such prepaid Debenture represents in the Trust or Pool backing such TC.
( d ) The Agency shall be discharged from its guarantee obligation to the holder or holders of any TC, or any successor or transferee of such holder, to the extent of any such prepayment, whether or not such successor or transferee shall have notice of any such prepayment.
( e ) Interest on prepaid Debentures shall accrue only through the date of prepayment.
( f ) In the event that all Debentures constituting a Trust or Pool are prepaid, the TCs backed by such Trust or Pool shall be redeemed by payment of the unpaid principal and interest on the TCs; provided, however, that in the case of the prepayment of a Debenture pursuant to the provisions of the Guaranty Agreement relating to the Debenture, the Central Registration Agent (CRA) shall pass through pro rata to the holders of the TCs any such prepayments including any prepayment penalty paid by the obligor RBIC pursuant to the terms of the Debenture.
§ 3201.21 Disposable containers. ( a ) *Definition.* Products designed to be used for temporary storage or transportation of materials including, but not limited to, food items.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a biobased content of at least 72 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Biodegradability.* At the time a manufacturer offers a product under this item for Federal purchase under the BioPreferred Program, the preferred procurement product must be capable of meeting the current version of ASTM D6400 if disposed of in a non-marine environment, the current version of ASTM D7081 if disposed of in a marine environment, or other appropriate and applicable standard for biodegradability.
( d ) *Determining overlap with an EPA-designated recovered content product.* Qualifying biobased products that fall under this item may, in some cases, overlap with the EPA-designated recovered content product: Paper and Paper Products. USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information on the BioPreferred Web site of qualifying biobased products about the intended uses of the product, information on whether or not the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether or not a qualifying biobased product overlaps with EPA-designated paper and paper products and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing. Note to paragraph ( d
):
Disposable containers can include boxes and packaging made from paper. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designated paper and paper products containing recovered materials as items for which Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.10. EPA provides recovered materials content recommendations for paper and paper products in the Recovered Materials Advisory Notice (RMAN) published for these products. The RMAN recommendations can be found on EPA's Web site *http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/procure/products.htm* and then clicking on the appropriate product name.
( e ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than May 14, 2009, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased disposable containers. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased disposable containers.
[73 FR 27953, May 14, 2008]
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.1500 Restrictions on distributions to RBIC investors while RBIC has outstanding Leverage. ( a ) *Restriction on distribution.* If you have outstanding Leverage, whenever you make a distribution to your investors you must make, at the same time, a prepayment to or for the benefit of the third-party holder of the Debenture sold pursuant to § 4290.1240 of this part, accrued unpaid interest and the principal, in whole or in part, of one or more of your Debentures outstanding as of the date of the distribution (subject to the terms of such Debentures).
( b ) *Amount of prepayment.* You must calculate the amount due the third-party holder by multiplying the total amount you intend to distribute by a fraction whose numerator is the outstanding principal of your Debenture(s) immediately preceding your distribution, and whose denominator is the sum of your Leverageable Capital as of that time plus the outstanding principal amount of your Debentures. For purposes of the preceding sentence “principal” means both the net proceeds and interest accrued to date of a discounted Debenture. The amount of any payment received under this section will be credited first against unpaid interest accrued to the date of distribution and then to the principal in whole or in part of the first Debenture you select to prepay and then to the interest and principal in whole or in part of such other Debenture(s) as you select to prepay. You may elect to prepay in whole any discounted Debenture under this section only within five years of its maturity date. Payments under this section must be made on the next occurring March 1 or September 1.
( c ) *Effect of prepayment.* Subject to the terms of the Debenture(s), you may voluntarily prepay additional principal, but neither mandatory nor voluntary prepayment will increase your future Leverage eligibility.
#### In the Matter of Carl A.G., Appellant, v Myriam L.G., Respondent.

Submitted May 29, 2007;

decided July 2, 2007

Reported below, 39 AD3d 1232.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 5:94cr5004/LAC 

5:06cv20/LAC/MD

ALPHONSE GAINER

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on January 23, 2006, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after

reviewing objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

The motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2255 (doc. 116) is summarily DISMISSED as successive.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of February, 2006.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:94-cr-05004-LC-MD Document 124 Filed 02/14/06 Page 1 of 1
#### William Young, Respondent-Appellant, v. Forest Hills General Hospital, Respondent, and Samuel Henken, Appellant-Respondent.

Appeal by defendant Henken, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 15, 1966, as is against him and in favor of plaintiff. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from by said defendant, with costs. Plaintiff cross-appealed from so much of the judgment as is in favor of defendant Forest Hills General Hospital and, on the ground of inadequacy, from the portion of the judgment against defendant Henken; and the defendant Hospital made a motion to dismiss the cross appeal as to it, following which a written stipulation, dated February 5, 1969, was made withdrawing the cross appeal as to the defendant Hospital. The cross appeal as to both defendants is herewith deemed withdrawn and abandoned, without costs, as to the Hospital upon the stipulation and as to defendant Henken because plaintiff’s brief makes no contention with respect thereto. In our opinion there was full and complete cross-examination of plaintiff’s expert witness. His failure to return for the completion of his redirect examination and for recross-examination was impliedly acquiesced in by defense *counsel in*their failure to seek a direction for his return the following day in the face of the probability that he would not otherwise reappear. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RICHIE JONES,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5532-MCR-EMT

ANDREW SAUL,

Defendant.

/

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on March 

26, 2021. ECF No. 21. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 

21, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5532-MCR-EMT

2. Defendant’s unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence 

Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with Reversal and Remand of the Cause to the Defendant,

ECF No. 20, is GRANTED.

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff 

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, REVERSING the Commissioner’s decision pursuant to 

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and REMANDING the case for further 

administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. ECF 

No. 21. 

3. The clerk of court is directed to close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of April 2021.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                               5
<CIK>                          0000797324
<NAME>                         LASERGATE SYSTEMS, INC.
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                          1,924,825
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     868,931
<ALLOWANCES>                      147,000
<INVENTORY>                       254,901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                3,089,623
<PP&E>                            579,457
<DEPRECIATION>                    275,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  6,436,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,180,392
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                           240
<COMMON>                          222,961
<OTHER-SE>                      2,895,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    6,436,945
<SALES>                         4,024,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,024,626
<CGS>                           2,937,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   9,188,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  (67,674)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 53,577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (4,997,962)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (4,997,962)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (4,997,962)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0
        



</TABLE>
§ 51.1145 U.S. No. 1 Bronze. The requirements for this grade are the same as for U.S. No. 1 except at least 30 percent, by count, of the fruit shall have more than one-third of their surface, in the aggregate, affected by discoloration. The predominating discoloration on each fruit shall be of rust mite type. ( a ) For tolerances see § 51.1151.
( b ) Internal quality: Lots meeting the internal requirements for “U.S. Grade AA Juice (Double A)” or “U.S. Grade A Juice” may be so specified in connection with the grade. (See §§ 51.1176-51.1179.)
#### In the Matter of Posh Bagel, Inc., Petitioner, v Board of Health of the County of Westchester et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Department of Health of the County of Westchester, dated December 5, 1977, which, after a hearing, found petitioner to be in violation of the Public Health Law and directed, *inter alia,*the payment of a $6,000 civil penalty. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The petitioner received notice of the hearing and charges at its place of business by certified mail, return receipt requested. At the hearing it was represented by its supervisor of maintenance. Although the person selected *899may not have been the most qualified representative, petitioner was fully apprised of the nature of the hearing and the charges. Under the facts and circumstances, it was petitioner’s responsibility to see that it was properly represented. The hearing officer acted within his discretion in proceeding with the hearing, and all due process requirements were met. (See *Matter of Hecht v Monaghan,*307 NY 461.) We also note that the transfer by Special Term was improper. There was no substantial evidence question raised inasmuch as the evidence presented by respondents was uncontradicted. (See *Matter of Weiss v Berger,*86 Misc 2d 109.) The only issue presented, the adequacy of the notice and hearing, was a question of law, which should have been resolved in the first instance by Special Term. (See *Falkenbury v Schultz,*44 AD2d 827; cf. *Matter of Mistler v Tofany,*39 AD2d 710.) Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PATRICK ANTHONY RIBBING,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv1413-TKW-MJF 

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.,

Defendants.

/

OR D E R

This case is before the Court based upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 12). No objections to the Report and Recommendation 

were filed. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the case file, I 

agree with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed 

based on Plaintiff’s failure to respond to court orders1and failure to prosecute.

2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the case file.

1

 The orders with which Plaintiff failed to comply were mailed to Plaintiff at his address of record, but they 

were returned as undeliverable. See Docs. 7, 8, 13.

2

 Plaintiff’s failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address reflects an abandonment of the case and 

a failure to prosecute.

Case 3:20-cv-01413-TKW-MJF Document 14 Filed 04/20/20 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE and ORDERED this 20th day of April, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-01413-TKW-MJF Document 14 Filed 04/20/20 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PICTURETEL
CORPORATION'S BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 29,
1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          45,490
<SECURITIES>                                    15,478
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,813)
<INVENTORY>                                     36,390
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               224,541
<PP&E>                                          86,995
<DEPRECIATION>                                (51,284)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 315,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,390
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           334
<OTHER-SE>                                     227,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   315,607
<SALES>                                        221,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               221,083
<CGS>                                          114,452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  114,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,844
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,887
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,957
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,957
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
        

</TABLE>