alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ISAAC MATHIS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:20cv278-MW-MAF

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, and MARTIN 

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se, initiated this case in late May

2020, by submitting an in forma pauperis motion, ECF No. 2, and a § 1983

civil rights complaint, ECF No. 1. Noting that Plaintiff’s complaint

concerned events which transpired at Martin Correctional Institution, a

Report and Recommendation was entered on June 1, 2020, to transfer this

case. ECF No. 4. However, Plaintiff has now filed a notice of voluntary

dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a). ECF No. 5. 

Case 4:20-cv-00278-WS-MAF Document 6 Filed 06/08/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) provides that an action

may be dismissed without an order of the court by filing a notice of

dismissal at any time before the adverse party serves his answer, or files a

motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal is

appropriately accepted under Rule 41(a). Although Plaintiff’s notice is

effective without an order, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A), Anago

Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012), this Order

confirms that the case has been dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk

must close the file. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal, ECF No. 5, filed pursuant

to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), is ACCEPTED.

2. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 4, is VACATED.

3. The Clerk of Court shall administratively close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED on June 8, 2020.

S/ Martin A. Fitzpatrick 

MARTIN A. FITZPATRICK 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 4:20cv278-WS-MAF

Case 4:20-cv-00278-WS-MAF Document 6 Filed 06/08/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Terra Energy Resources, Ltd., formerly Terra Media, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Monahan, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 21st day of October, 2008.   /s/ Thomas Monahan --------------------------------- President, Secretary, Treasurer, Director, and Chief Financial Officer and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ANTHONY M. HOOD,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5:20cv184-RV/MAF

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

 /

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of 

the U.S. Magistrate Judge dated July 10, 2020 (ECF No. 4), to dismiss the

petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF 

No. 1). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections 

pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having 

considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined the Report 

and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order. 

Case 5:20-cv-00184-RV-MAF Document 5 Filed 08/10/20 Page 1 of 2
2. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The petition for writ of 

habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED. Any certificate of appealability 

is DENIED and leave to appeal in forma pauperis is also DENIED.” 

3. The Clerk shall close the file. 

DONE AND ORDERED on this 10th day of August, 2020.

s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00184-RV-MAF Document 5 Filed 08/10/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Material Sciences Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Clifford D.
Nastas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



July 2, 2008By:

/s/ Clifford D. NastasClifford D. NastasChief Executive Officer


In connection with the Report, I, James M. Froisland, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief
Information Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



July 2, 2008By:

/s/ James M. FroislandJames M. FroislandSenior Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer, Chief InformationOfficer and Corporate Secretary
#### Victoria Corona et al., Respondents, v Suffolk Transportation Service, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[815 NYS2d 254]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Suffolk Transportation Service, Inc., and Sally Pancotto appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated April 20, 2005, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

During March and April of 2001, the infant plaintiff, then a first-grader, allegedly was assaulted on three separate occasions by a second-grader while being transported on a school bus owned and operated by the defendant Suffolk Transportation Service, Inc. (hereinafter STS), and driven by the defendant Sally Pancotto. The plaintiffs commenced this action alleging, inter alia, that STS and Pancotto (hereinafter collectively the defendants) failed to provide adequate supervision of the students on the bus. The Supreme Court denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. We reverse.

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by submitting evidence that they had no *727actual or constructive notice or knowledge of the assailant’s alleged proclivity to engage in misconduct *(see Mirand v City of New York,*84 NY2d 44, 49 [1994]). The deposition testimony established that there was no prior notice of any problems or complaints regarding the assailant, and that the infant plaintiff did not inform anyone of the assaults until she told her mother about them approximately six months after the latest incident *(see Murnyack v Rebon,*21 AD3d 1406 [2005]; *Doe v Rohan, 17*AD3d 509 [2005]).

In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to the defendants’ breach of the duty to adequately supervise the students on the bus *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557 [1980]; *see also Mirand v City of New York, supra).*The affidavit of a licensed clinical social worker who opined, after treating the infant plaintiff, that she was assaulted, was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact regarding the defendants’ notice or knowledge of any prior similar conduct by the assailant *(see Doe v Rohan, supra; Whitfield v Board of Educ. of City of Mount Vernon,*14 AD3d 552 [2005]).

In light of our determination on the issue of the breach of the defendants’ duty of care, we need not reach the issue of proximate cause.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Adams, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.
No. 89-931.

#### Portland Audubon Society et al. *v.*Lujan, Secretary of the Interior, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 301.32-2 Regulated articles. ( a ) *List of regulated articles.* Certain berries, fruits, nuts, and vegetables are regulated articles for one or more species of fruit fly unless the berries, fruits, nuts, or vegetables are canned, dried, or frozen below −17.8 °C (0 °F). The relevant commodity (both botanical name and common name), as well as the fruit fly species for which it is a regulated article, is found at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/fruit-flies/fruit-flies-home .*
( b ) *Normal process for adding regulated articles.* ( 1 ) If the Administrator determines that an article not already listed at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/fruit-flies/fruit-flies-home* presents a risk of spreading one or more species of fruit flies, APHIS will publish a notice in the Federal Register proposing to designate the article as a regulated article for the relevant species of fruit flies. The notice will provide the basis for this determination and will request public comment.
( 2 ) If no comments are received on the notice, or if the comments do not change the Administrator's determination, APHIS will publish a second notice in the Federal Register designating the article as a regulated article for the relevant species of fruit flies and listing it.
( c ) *Soil and plants as regulated articles.* Soil is a regulated article if it is within the dripline of a regulated article that is listed at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/fruit-flies/fruit-flies-home* and that is annotated with an asterisk. Plants are regulated articles if they are producing or have produced species in the family Cucurbitaceae that are listed at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/fruit-flies/fruit-flies-home* as regulated articles for melon fruit fly.
( d ) *Immediate designation of other regulated articles.* Any other product, article, or means of conveyance not listed at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/fruit-flies/fruit-flies-home* is a regulated article, if an inspector determines it presents a risk of spreading fruit flies, when the inspector notifies the person in possession of the product, article, or means of conveyance that it is subject to the restrictions of this subpart.
[88 FR 80003, Dec. 29, 2022]
#### § 4280.314 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:92cr4034-WS

THOMAS DEWAYNE WHITE,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 87)

docketed April 8, 2008. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendants' request

for jail credit (doc. 86) be denied. The defendant has filed no objections to the report

and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 87) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

Case 4:92-cr-04034-WS-WCS Document 88 Filed 04/28/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:92cr4034-WS

2. The defendant's request for jail credit (doc. 86) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of April , 2008.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:92-cr-04034-WS-WCS Document 88 Filed 04/28/08 Page 2 of 2
# L_2021396EN.01000101.xml

| 10.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 396/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 396/1

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/1932

of 9 November 2021

implementing Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 of 18 January 2016 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya and repealing Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 (1), and in particular Article 21(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 January 2016, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/44. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 January 2016, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/44.

| (2) | On the basis of a review by the Council, the entry for one listed person should be deleted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review by the Council, the entry for one listed person should be deleted.

| (3) | Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 November 2021.

For the Council

The President

A. ŠIRCELJ

---

(1)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

In Regulation (EU) 2016/44, Annex III (List of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies referred to in Article 6(2)), Part A (persons) entry 6 (concerning AL-MAHMOUDI, Baghdadi) is deleted.

---
Unassociated Document


    
      EXHIBIT
10.4

    

     

    No:
C-B-07

    


    


    Hangzhou
Bank Co. Ltd.

    


    Financing
Guarantee Letter

    


    


    


    To:
Shenzhen Branch, Hangzhou Bank Co. Ltd.

    


    I am
willing to provide the debtor Shenzhen SCM Shenzhen Ltd., which signs the
Comprehensive Financing Line Contract (No. 2009SC000000841 ) with irrevocable
jointly and severally guarantee liabilities.

    


    Guarantee
validity: since the starting day of the obligation performance of the principal
contract till 2 years after the expiration date.

    


    Security
range: RMB43,750,000.00 (including bill discounts, acceptance, guarantee,
advance for L/C), interest (including compound interest) and penalty rate,
penalty, compensation and all the notary, evaluation, auction, litigation, legal
expenses occurred in order to recall the creditor rights.

    


    I
recognize and accept the validity of the Comprehensive Financing Line Contract
and this Financing Guarantee Letter, and commit to carry it out conscientiously.
In case of other guarantee or warranty of the principal claim guaranteed besides
that agreed in this Financing Guarantee Letter, it shall not influence any of
your rights and its fulfillment under this Financing Guarantee Letter, and I
shall not raise a plea against you on this basis.

    


    


    


    


    ID
number:__________________________

    


    Address:___________________________

     

    Telephone
No.: ______________________

    


    Postal
Code: ________________________

    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    Guarantor
(chop): Hantao Cui

    /s/Hantao
Cui

    


    April
2009
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Purtell, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on October 20, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Bloom and Markewich, JJ.
#### § 3430.906 Matching requirements.

There are no matching requirements for grants under this subpart.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOE N. WILFORD,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:03cv22-RH/WCS

PEAVY & SON CONSTRUCTION

CO., INC.,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER DETERMINING DEFENDANT’S

ENTITLEMENT TO AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES

Defendant has prevailed on plaintiff’s motion to enforce the settlement

agreement in this matter. The settlement agreement provided that any breach “may

be addressed by the federal district court with the prevailing party recovering

attorney fees and costs, together with damages, as decided by the court.” 

(Document 37, attachment 3 (exhibit C) at 1 ¶2.) At the hearing on plaintiff’s

motion to enforce, after the ruling in defendant’s favor was announced, defendant

moved orally for an award of fees, and plaintiff was given until July 20, 2005, to

file any argument in opposition to entry of an order determining that defendant is

entitled to such an award. Plaintiff has filed no such argument, apparently

Case 4:03-cv-00022-RH Document 66 Filed 07/31/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:03cv22-RH/WCS

acquiescing in entry of such an order. And even absent acquiescence, defendant is

the “prevailing party” on the motion to enforce and thus is entitled to an award of

fees.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

Defendant is hereby determined, in accordance with Local Rule 54.1, to be

entitled to an award of attorney’s fees in connection with plaintiff’s motion to

enforce. Further proceedings for determination of the amount of fees to be

awarded will go forward under Local Rule 54.1(E).

SO ORDERED this 31st day of July, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:03-cv-00022-RH Document 66 Filed 07/31/05 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 22.1




                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



                                            Jurisdiction of
         Name                                Incorporation
         ----                               ---------------

The Wurlitzer Company                            Delaware

Baldwin Trading Company                          Ohio

The Baldwin Piano Company                        Canada
     (Canada) Limited

Desarrollos Baldwin, S.A. de C.V.                Mexico

Fabricantes Tecnicos, S.A.                       Mexico

Servicios Baldwin, S.A.                          Mexico

Immobiliaria Baldwin, S.A.                       Mexico

Korean American Musical Instrument               Korea
   Corporation
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order 

September 28, 2005 

128366 

RAYMOND PIGG,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v 

GENERAL STEEL ERECTORS, INC.,

and LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

SUPER CAR WASH SYSTEMS EAST, 

INC., and FARM BUREAU INSURANCE

COMPANY, ABZ STEEL FABRICATION, 

TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE 

COMPANY, and McDONALD'S

(UNINSURED),

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

 SC: 128366 

 COA: 258414 

WCAC: 03-000368 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 

2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005
 

Clerk
22.609 [Reserved]

Parent topic: Subpart 22.6 - Contracts for Materials, Supplies, Articles, and Equipment
#### §§ 4286.146-4287.155 [Reserved]
**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED **

**PURSUANT        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company.   |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |                                                                                                              |
|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                  March 29, 2007 | /s/                  E.F.H. RobertsE.                  F. H. RobertsExecutive                  Vice-President and |
|                                  | Chief                  Financial Officer                                                                          |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

TYRONE SUMMERS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 4:20cv340-MW/MAF

SERGEANT SPIRES,

Defendant.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 15. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED

for failure to comply with a court order and for want of prosecution.” The Clerk shall 

close the file. 

SO ORDERED on March 15, 2021.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00340-MW-MAF Document 16 Filed 03/15/21 Page 1 of 1