Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 30, 2010 / Notices 74081 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Qisda Corporation, 157 Shan-Ying Road 

Gueishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan. 

Qisda America Corporation, 8941 

Research Drive, Suite 200, Irvine, 

CA 92618. 

Qisda (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., 169 Zhujiang 

Road, Suzhou, China 215015. 

BenQ Corporation, 16 Jihu Road, Neihu, 

Taipei 114, Taiwan. 

BenQ America Corporation, 15375 

Barranca Parkway, Suite A–205, 

Irvine, CA 92618. 

BenQ Latin America Corporation, 8200 

NW 33rd Street, Suite 301, Miami, 

FL 33122. 

AU Optronics Corporation, No. 1, LiHsin Road 2, Hsinchu Science Park, 

Hsinchu, Taiwan. 

AU Optronics Corporation America, 

9720 Cypresswood Drive, Suite 241, 

Houston, TX 77070–3355. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Daniel L. Girdwood, Esq., Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 

20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30010 Filed 11–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–750] 

In the Matter of Certain Mobile Devices 

and Related Software; Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

October 29, 2010, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Apple Inc., f/ 

k/a Apple Computer, Inc. of Cupertino, 

California. The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain mobile devices and related 

software by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 

7,812,828 (‘‘the ’828 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 7,663,607 (‘‘the ’607 patent’’); 

and U.S. Patent No. 5,379,430 (‘‘the ’430 

patent’’). The complaint further alleges 

that an industry in the United States 

exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of 

section 337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue an 

exclusion order and a cease and desist 

order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

202–205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benjamin Levi, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, telephone (202) 

205–2781. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2010). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

November 23, 2010, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain mobile devices 

and related software that infringe one or 

more of claims 1, 2, 10, 11, 24–26 and 

29 of the ‘828 patent; claims 1–7 and 10 

of the ‘607 patent; and claims 1, 3, and 

5 of the ‘430 patent, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Apple Inc., f/ 

k/a Apple Computer, Inc., 1 Infinite 

Loop, Cupertino, CA 95014. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Motorola, Inc., 1303 East Algonquin 

Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196; 

Motorola Mobility, Inc., 600 North U.S. 

Highway 45, Libertyville, IL 60048. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Benjamin Levi, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
74082 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 30, 2010 / Notices 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 23, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30013 Filed 11–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives 

[OMB Number 1140–0091] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: 60-Day notice of information 

collection under review: customer 

satisfaction surveys. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives (ATF), will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

This notice requests comments from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed information collection. 

Comments are encouraged and will be 

accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until January 

31, 2011. This process is conducted in 

accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. 

If you have comments especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact Mary Lynn Wolfe, 

Mary.Wolfe@atf.gov, Arson and 

Explosives Programs Division, Fax# 

(202) 648–9660, 99 New York Avenue, 

NE., Washington, DC 20226. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed information 

collection are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed collection 

of information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the agency, 

including whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the proposed 

collection of information, including the 

validity of the methodology and assumptions 

used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 

the information to be collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on those who are to respond, 

including through the use of appropriate 

automated, electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or other 

forms of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Summary of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

Customer Satisfaction Surveys. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Form Number: None. Bureau 

of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and 

Explosives. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, Primary: State, 

Local or Tribal Government. Other: 

None. 

Need for Collection 

The Arson and Explosives Programs 

Division (AEPD) of the Bureau of 

Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and 

Explosives distribute program-specific 

customer satisfaction surveys to more 

effectively capture customer perception/ 

satisfaction of services. AEPD’s strategy 

is based on a commitment to provide 

the kind of customer service that will 

better accomplish ATF’s mission. 

An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: It is estimated that 500 

respondents will complete a 15 minute 

survey. 

An estimate of the total public burden 

(in hours) associated with the collection: 

There are an estimated 125 annual total 

burden hours associated with this 

collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact Lynn Murray, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, 2 Constitution Square, 

Room 2E–502, 145 N Street, NE., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: November 23, 2010. 

Lynn Murray, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30002 Filed 11–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request; Job Corps 

Placement and Assistance Record 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor 

(DOL) hereby announces the submission 

of the Employment and Training 

Administration (ETA) sponsored 

information collection request (ICR) 

titled, ‘‘Job Corps Placement and 

Assistance Record,’’ to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval for continued use 

in accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 

44 U.S.C. chapter 35). 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

December 30, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR, with 

applicable supporting documentation; 

including a description of the likely 

respondents, proposed frequency of 

response, and estimated total burden 

may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov 

Web site, http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain or by contacting 

Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693– 

4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or 

sending an e-mail to 

DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

Submit comments about this request 

to the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk 

Officer for the Department of Labor, 

Employment and Training 

Administration (ETA), Office of 

Management and Budget, Room 10235, 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES