alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**Consent of Independent Auditors**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 333-218594) pertaining to the 2017 Equity Incentive and 2017 Non-EmployeeDirector Plans of KCAP Financial, Inc. of our report dated March 7, 2018, with respect to the combined financial statements ofthe Asset Manager Affiliates, included in KCAP Financial Inc.’s Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2017, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

 

/s/ Ernst& Young LLP

New York, New York

March 7, 2018
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

DAVID L DICE, JR, 

Case No. 3:20cv5777-LC-HTC

Plaintiff,

v.

SECRETARY FDOC MARK S. 

INCH, LT J NEEL, 

OFC E R MANNERS, 

OFC T MILLER, 

OFC A ALLIGOOD, 

NURSE JANE DOE, 

NURSE JANE DOE, 

Defendants. 

/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation dated September 3, 2020 (ECF No. 5). The parties have been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the objections 

thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Case 3:20-cv-05777-LC-HTC Document 7 Filed 09/29/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5777-LC-HTC 

 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. 5) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and the pending 

motion for temporary restraining order (ECF Doc. 4) terminated for 

Plaintiff's abuse of the judicial process and because he is a threestriker under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

3. The Clerk is directed to close the file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of September, 2020. 

LACEY A. COLLIER 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

s/L.A. Collier 

Case 3:20-cv-05777-LC-HTC Document 7 Filed 09/29/20 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:99-cv-00242-RH Document 67 Filed 01/30/01 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 5
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 62 FR 8361, Feb. 25, 1997.

§ 5.1 Parity index and index of prices received by farmers. ( a ) The parity index and related indices for the purpose of calculating parity prices after May 1, 1976, according to the formula contained in section 301(a) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended by the Agricultural Acts of 1948, 1949, 1954, and 1956 (hereinafter referred to as section 301(a)) shall be the index of prices paid by farmers, interest, taxes, and farm wage rates, as revised May 1976 and published in the May 28, 1976, and subsequent issues of the monthly report, “Agricultural Prices.” The publication of these indices by the National Agricultural Statistics Service in the monthly report, “Agricultural Prices”, shall be continued.
( b ) The measure of the general level of prices received by farmers as provided for in section 301(a)(1)(B)(ii) after January 1, 1959, shall be the index of prices received by farmers as revised January 1959 and published in the January 30, 1959, and subsequent issues of “Agricultural Prices”. The simple average of the 120 monthly indices included in the preceding 10 calendar years plus an adjustment to take account of the effect on the index of any adjustment made on average prices of individual commodities as hereinafter specified shall be used in the calculation of the adjusted base prices. Parity prices heretofore published for periods prior to January 1, 1959 shall not be revised.
( c ) The term *milkfat* as used in these regulations is synonymous with the term *butterfat,* and when any statute requires calculation of the parity price of butterfat, the parity price of milkfat shall be the parity price of butterfat.
[24 FR 697, Jan. 31, 1959, as amended by Amdt. 6, 24 FR 9778, Dec. 5, 1959; Amdt. 29, 41 FR 22333, June 3, 1976]
#### § 4288.3 Review or appeal rights.

A person may seek a review of an Agency decision or appeal to the National Appeals Division in accordance with 7 CFR part 11 of this title.
160 So.2d 226

#### ALGIERS HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION v. Richard E. BROWN, Jr., Administrator of the Division of Employment Security of the Department of Labor of the State of Louisiana, and Brenda P. Migaud.

No. 47077.

Feb. 7, 1964.

Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit.

158 So.2d 863.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
# 28.106 Administration.

- 28.106-1 Bonds and bond-related forms. 
- 28.106-2 Substitution of surety bonds. 
- 28.106-3 Additional bond and security. 
- 28.106-4 Contract clause. 
- 28.106-5 Consent of surety. 
- 28.106-6 Furnishing information. 
- 28.106-7 Withholding contract payments. 
- 28.106-8 Payment to subcontractors or suppliers. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 28.1 - Bonds and Other Financial Protections
§ 3555.352 Loss covered by the guarantee. Subject to § 3555.351, the loss claim payment will be calculated as the difference between the Total Indebtedness on the loan and the Net Recovery Value calculated according to § 3555.353. The Total Indebtedness on the loan includes: ( a ) *Principal balance.* The unpaid principal balance;
( b ) *Accrued interest.* Accrued interest at the guaranteed loan note rate from the last day interest was paid by the borrower to the settlement date, as defined at § 3555.10;
( c ) *Additional interest.* Additional interest on the unsatisfied principal accrued from the settlement date to the date the claim is paid, but not more than 60 days from the settlement date;
( d ) *Protective advances.* Principal and interest for protective advances, as described in § 3555.303; and
( e ) *Liquidation costs.* Reasonable and customary liquidation costs, such as attorney fees, market value appraisals, and foreclosure costs. Annual fees advanced by the lender to the Agency are ineligible for reimbursement when calculating the loss claim payment.
[78 FR 73941, Dec. 9, 2013, as amended at 81 FR 31164, May 18, 2016; 84 FR 70886, Dec. 26, 2019]
TS-ASLT60

Attachment #7

Pt. 2, Sec. B, 1a 

Processing Information on the New Chemical Substances at Industrial Sites 

Controlled by Others 
Attachment #7

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical 

Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by Others – Manufacture and Processing

TS-ASLT60
2006-0696.

#### Compton v. Jeffreys.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Jeremy G. Compton. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RICHARD DELGADO CRUZ,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-248-TKW-MJF

SECRETARY INCH, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 17) and Plaintiff’s objection (Doc. 19). The Court reviewed 

the issues raised in the objection de novo as required by 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), and based on that review, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that Plaintiff’s amended complaint fails to state a 

plausible deliberate indifference claim under 42 U.S.C. §1983 against any of the 

Defendants. This does not mean that Plaintiff lacks a judicial remedy because, to 

the extent that the named defendants (or others) were negligent in allowing 

Plaintiff’s CT scan to “fall through the cracks,” he can seek relief in state court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

Case 5:20-cv-00248-TKW-MJF Document 20 Filed 08/02/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of August, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00248-TKW-MJF Document 20 Filed 08/02/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Material Sciences Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Clifford D.
Nastas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



October 9, 2008By:

/s/ Clifford D. NastasClifford D. NastasChief Executive Officer


In connection with the Report, I, James M. Froisland, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief
Information Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



October 9, 2008By:

/s/ James M. FroislandJames M. FroislandSenior Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer, Chief InformationOfficer and Corporate Secretary




38
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     Inconnection with the Annual Report of WSB Financial Group, Inc. (the“*Company*”) on Form 10-K/Afor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “*Form 10-K*”), I, David K. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: (1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.Dated:March 29, 2007         By:                                              /s/ David K. Johnson   David K. Johnson   *President and Chief Executive Officer*
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 155 East Tropicana, LLC, a Nevadalimited-liability company and 155 East Tropicana Finance Corp., a Nevadacorporation (collectively, the “Company”) for the three months ended September30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), Neil G. Kiefer, as President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Neil G. Kiefer      |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Neil  G. Kiefer,         |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
| November  14, 2007       |

 

 

The foregoing certificationsare being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and are not being filedas part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

1

----
#### § 4288.7 Exception authority.

The Administrator of the Agency (“Administrator”) may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture, make an exception, on a case-by-case basis, to any requirement or provision of this subpart that is not inconsistent with any authorizing statute or applicable law, if the Administrator determines that application of the requirement or provision would adversely affect the Federal government's interest.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND UNASSIGNED
DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     1,242,033,780
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                 116,789,936
<MORTGAGE>                                 415,927,088
<REAL-ESTATE>                               24,792,423
<TOTAL-INVEST>                           1,799,543,227
<CASH>                                     (7,449,538)
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             382,866
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           9,455,323,503
<POLICY-LOSSES>                          1,779,134,485
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                       28,165,401
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             51,168,673
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,500,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 325,342,718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             9,455,323,503
<PREMIUMS>                                 452,275,781
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         64,412,527
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                         (1,007,710)
<OTHER-INCOME>                             261,862,698
<BENEFITS>                                 611,113,402
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,955,213
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (378,747)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,333,960
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
§ 4280.55 Monitoring responsibilities. ( a ) The Intermediary must monitor the Project to ensure that: ( 1 ) Funds are used only for the approved purposes as specified in the legal documents;
( 2 ) Disbursements and expenditures of funds are properly supported with certifications, invoices, contracts, bills of sale, or other forms of evidence, which are maintained on the premises of the Intermediary;
( 3 ) Project time schedules are being met, projected work by time periods is being accomplished, and other performance objectives are being achieved; and
( 4 ) The Project is in compliance with all applicable regulations.
( b ) Rural Development may inspect and copy records and documents that pertain to the Project. The Intermediary must retain these records for the term of the Project loan plus 2 years. In addition, Rural Development may also perform Project site visits and reviews of the use of loan or Grant proceeds.
( c ) Rural Development will review and monitor Grants in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, as adopted by USDA in 2 CFR parts 400, 415, 417, 418, and 421 as applicable.
[72 FR 29843, May 30, 2007, as amended at 79 FR 76015, Dec. 19, 2014]
§ 42.121 Sampling and inspection procedures. ( a ) Following skip lot procedure authorization, inspect every lot consecutively offered for inspection using normal inspection procedures as set forth in Subpart B of this part. When 10 consecutive lots are acceptable, inspect only one-half of the lots offered for inspection using normal inspection procedures. While on the one-half inspection rate, when 10 consecutively inspected lots are acceptable, inspect only one-fourth of the lots offered for inspection using normal inspection procedures. While on the one-half or one-fourth inspection rate, if any formally inspected lot is unacceptable, revert immediately to the inspection of every lot using normal inspection procedures and recommence the above procedure. See § 42.123 for a flow diagram of the skip lot sampling plan.
( b ) Two exceptions to the procedures in paragraph (a) of this section are as follows: ( 1 ) The skip lot sampling and inspection rate of one-half can be instituted immediately if the lots from the producer are currently on, or eligible to be on, reduced inspection and all other conditions in § 42.120 are met. After skip lot sampling and inspection begins, however, only normal inspection is permitted.
( 2 ) While inspecting every lot consecutively as offered for inspection, i.e., while not on the one-half or one-fourth sampling and inspection rate, if requirements for switching from normal to tightened inspection are met as specified in § 42.108 then skip lot procedures terminate, tightened inspection is initiated, and stationary lot sampling and inspection procedures in Subpart B are instituted. Skip lot procedures may be instituted again only when all conditions of § 42.120 are met.
( c ) All lot selections for the one-half and one-fourth inspection rates must be strictly random (for example, not every other lot or every fourth lot). Use of random number tables, coin flipping, or numbered cards is encouraged.
( d ) Preliminary scanning procedures (see § 42.105) shall be used on all lots scheduled for formal inspection and also shall be used on lots not scheduled for inspection (“skipped” lots) whenever the inspector feels such action is prudent to further insure the acceptability of such lots.
§ 3560.155 Assignment of rental units and occupancy policies. ( a ) *General.* Available rental units are assigned in accordance with the requirements of this section and the priorities and preferences outlined in § 3560.154.
( b ) *Rental units accessible to individuals with disabilities.* If a rental unit accessible to individuals with disabilities is available and there are no applicants that require the features of the unit, borrowers may rent the unit to a non-disabled tenant subject to the inclusion of a lease provision that requires the tenant to vacate the unit within 30 days of notification from management that an eligible individual with disabilities requires the unit and provided the accessible unit has been marketed as an accessible unit, outreach has been made to organizations representing the disabled, and marketing of the unit as an accessible unit continues after it has been rented to a tenant who is not in need of the special design features.
( c ) *Transfer of existing tenants within a housing project.* When a rental unit becomes available for occupancy and an eligible tenant in the housing project is either over housed or under housed as provided for in paragraph (e) of this section, the borrower must use the available unit for the over housed or under housed tenant, if suitable, prior to selecting an eligible applicant from the waiting list.
( d ) *Applicant placement.* When a specific rental unit type becomes available for occupancy, borrowers must select eligible applicants suitable for the available unit according to the priorities established in § 3560.154.
( e ) *Occupancy policies.* Borrowers must establish occupancy policies for each housing project. Households living in a rental unit with more bedrooms than persons in the household will be considered over housed and must be relocated in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. Households under housed as defined by the project's occupancy standards must be relocated in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. Borrowers with no one-bedroom units in a housing project may make an exception to this requirement in their occupancy policies. In addition, a borrower's occupancy policies must establish: ( 1 ) Reasonable standards for determining when a tenant household is considered under housed. The standards will describe the maximum number of persons that may occupy units of a given size based on occupancy guidelines provided by the Agency or another governmental source;
( 2 ) The order in which eligible applicants and existing tenants will be housed or re-housed; and
( 3 ) How fair housing requirements will be met, including how reasonable accommodations will be made for applicants and tenants with disabilities.
( f ) *Agency concurrence.* The Agency must concur with a borrower's occupancy rules prior to initial occupancy of the housing project. All modifications to occupancy rules must be posted for tenant comment in accordance with § 3560.160 and receive Agency concurrence prior to implementation.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Kohlberg Capital
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Dayl W. Pearson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 14, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/    DAYL W.
PEARSON               
|                     |  |     |  | Dayl W. Pearson                      
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer