UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
    1934

                    For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002


[] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
   1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14099


                         CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
         (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                             94-2940204
(State or other jurisdiction of                              (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                             Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                      (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)


                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)

                                  June 30, 2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $   93
   Receivables and deposits                                                      42
   Other assets                                                                 135
   Investment property:
      Land                                                    $ 916
      Buildings and related personal property                 10,186
                                                              11,102
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (5,425)         5,677

                                                                            $ 5,947
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficit) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 14
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           71
   Accrued property taxes                                                        59
   Other liabilities                                                            130
   Due to affiliates                                                             77
   Mortgage note payable                                                      5,266

Partners' (Deficit) Capital
   General partner                                             $ (2)
   Special limited partners                                      (76)
   Limited partners (181,300 units issued and
      outstanding)                                               408            330

                                                                            $ 5,947



            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>






                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except per unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                          Three Months               Six Months
                                         Ended June 30,            Ended June 30,
                                        2002         2001         2002         2001

   Revenues:
<S>                                    <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>
      Rental income                    $ 443        $ 381         $ 867        $ 772
      Other income                         62           40           107           90
      Casualty gain                        18           --            18           --
          Total revenues                  523          421           992          862

   Expenses:
      Operating                           197          200           371          388
      General and administrative           37           47            80          142
      Depreciation                        114          110           225          218
      Interest                            107           99           214          207
      Property taxes                       38           28            68           55
          Total expenses                  493          484           958        1,010

   Net income (loss)                    $ 30        $ (63)        $ 34        $ (148)

   Net income (loss) allocated to
      general partner (0.2%)            $ --         $ --         $ --         $ --

   Net income (loss) allocated to
      limited partners (99.8%)             30          (63)           34         (148)

                                        $ 30        $ (63)        $ 34        $ (148)

   Net income (loss) per limited
      partnership unit                 $ 0.17      $ (0.35)      $ 0.19       $ (0.82)

   Distribution per limited
      partnership unit                  $ --         $ --         $ --        $ 2.83

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>




                         CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIT) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                    Limited                 Special
                                  Partnership    General    Limited   Limited
                                     Units       Partner   Partners   Partners     Total

<S>                                 <C>            <C>       <C>      <C>         <C>
Original capital contributions      181,808        $ 1       $ --     $45,452     $45,453

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at December 31, 2001             181,300       $ (2)      $ (81)    $ 379       $ 296

Amortization of timing
   difference                            --          --          5         (5)         --

Net income for the six
   months ended June 30, 2002            --          --         --         34          34

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at June 30, 2002                 181,300       $ (2)      $ (76)    $ 408       $ 330
</TABLE>

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

<PAGE>


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                   (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Six Months Ended
                                                                        June 30,
                                                                  2002        2001
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                               <C>        <C>
  Net income (loss)                                               $ 34       $ (148)
  Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
   cash provided by operating activities:
   Depreciation                                                     225          218
   Amortization of loan costs                                         3            3
   Casualty gain                                                    (18)          --
  Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                       13           10
      Other assets                                                  (18)         (17)
      Accounts payable                                              (75)           3
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                             8           (8)
      Accrued property taxes                                        (63)         (72)
      Other liabilities                                              59           48
      Due to affiliates                                              23           --
         Net cash provided by operating activities                  191           37

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (201)         (95)
  Insurance proceeds received                                        19           --
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (182)         (95)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                 (70)         (73)
  Advances from affiliates                                           98           --
  Payments on advances from affiliates                             (184)          --
  Distributions paid to partners                                     --         (534)
         Net cash used in financing activities                     (156)        (607)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                          (147)        (665)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    240          810
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                        $ 93        $ 145

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                         $ 211        $ 169

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>




                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                     NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying  unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements of Consolidated
Capital  Properties VI (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial  statements.  In the opinion of ConCap  Equities,  Inc.  ("CEI" or the
"General  Partner"),  all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating
results for the three and six months  ended June 30, 2002,  are not  necessarily
indicative  of the  results  that may be  expected  for the fiscal  year  ending
December 31, 2002. For further information,  refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's  Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001. The General  Partner is
an  affiliate  of Apartment  Investment  and  Management  Company  ("AIMCO"),  a
publicly traded real estate investment trust.

Note B - Related Party Transactions

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership.

Affiliates of the General  Partner are entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts
from  the  Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$58,000  and  $46,000  for  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2002  and  2001,
respectively, which is included in operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of the General  Partner  received  reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $63,000 and $54,000 for the
six months  ended June 30,  2002 and 2001,  respectively,  which is  included in
investment  property and general and  administrative  expenses.  Included in the
amount for the six months ended June 30, 2002, are fees related to  construction
management  services  provided  by  an  affiliate  of  the  General  Partner  of
approximately  $15,000. The construction  management service fees are calculated
based on a percentage  of current year  additions  to the  investment  property.
There were no such fees paid during the six months  ended June 30,  2001.  As of
June 30, 2002, the Partnership owed approximately $24,000 to an affiliate of the
General Partner for reimbursement of accountable  administrative  expenses which
is included in Due to affiliates on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

The Partnership Agreement also provides for a special management fee equal to 9%
of the total  distributions  made from operations to the Limited  Partners to be
paid  to  the  General  Partner  for  executive  and  administrative  management
services.  No such  fee  was  earned  in  2002.  The  General  Partner  received
approximately  $46,000 in March 2001, resulting from a distribution declared and
paid during the six months  ended June  30,2001.  The fee is included in general
and administrative expenses.

The  Partnership  had  advances  from an  affiliate  of the  General  Partner of
approximately $139,000 as of December 31, 2001. During the six months ended June
30, 2002, the Partnership  received additional advances from an affiliate of the
General Partner of approximately  $98,000 and repaid  approximately  $188,000 of
these advances including  approximately $4,000 in accrued interest.  At June 30,
2002, the  Partnership  owed an affiliate of the General  Partner  approximately
$53,000  which  is  included  in  Due  to  an  affiliates  on  the  accompanying
consolidated balance sheet.  Interest is being charged at the prime rate plus 2%
and  amounted to  approximately  $3,000 for the six months  ended June 30, 2002.
There were no loans from the  General  Partner or  associated  interest  expense
during the six months ended June 30, 2001.

Beginning in 2001,  the  Partnership  began  insuring its property up to certain
limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally  self-insured for a
portion of losses and  liabilities  related  to workers  compensation,  property
casualty and vehicle liability.  The Partnership  insures its property above the
AIMCO  limits  through  insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers
unaffiliated with the General Partner. During the six months ended June 30, 2002
and 2001, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates  approximately
$17,000 and $19,000,  respectively,  for insurance  coverage and fees associated
with policy claims administration.

Note C - Change in Status of Non-Corporate General Partner

During the year ended December 31, 1991, the  Partnership  Agreement was amended
to convert the  general  partner  interests  held by the  non-corporate  general
partner,  Consolidated  Capital  Group II  ("CCG"),  to that of special  limited
partners ("Special Limited Partners").  The Special Limited Partners do not have
a vote and do not have any of the other rights of a Limited  Partner  except the
right to inspect  the  Partnership's  books and  records;  however,  the Special
Limited Partners  retained the economic  interest in the Partnership  which they
previously owned as general partner.

ConCap Equities, Inc. ("CEI") became the sole general partner of the Partnership
effective  December 31, 1991. In  connection  with CCG's  conversion,  a special
allocation of gross income was made to the Special Limited  Partners in order to
eliminate its tax basis negative capital account.

After the conversion,  the various Special Limited Partners transferred portions
of their  interests to CEI so that CEI now holds a .2% interest in all allocable
items of income,  loss and  distribution.  The  differences  between the Special
Limited  Partners'  capital  accounts for financial  statement and tax reporting
purposes are being amortized to the Limited  Partners'  capital  accounts as the
components of the timing differences which created the balance reverse.

Note D - Casualty Gain

The casualty gain is related to a fire at the property in August 2001. A gain of
approximately $43,000 was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2001. An
additional gain of  approximately  $18,000 was recognized  during the six months
ended June 30,  2002 due to the  receipt of  additional  insurance  proceeds  of
approximately $19,000, net of the write off of additional undepreciated property
improvements and replacements of approximately $1,000.


<PAGE>

Note E - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative  unitholders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order granting in part the demurrer.  The Court has dismissed without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General Partner and affiliated  defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002,
the Court held a hearing on plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took
the matter under submission after further briefing, as ordered by the court, was
submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002, the Court entered an order vacating
the  current  trial  date of  January  13,  2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and
discovery cut-off dates) and stayed the case in its entirety through November 7,
2002 so that the parties can have an opportunity to discuss settlement.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike the  complaint.  On December  11, 2001,  the court heard  argument on the
motions and took the matters under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court
served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the Heller
complaint  as a violation  of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On
March 27, 2002, the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking the
complaint. The parties are currently in the midst of briefing that appeal.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any  costs,  whether  legal or
settlement  costs,   associated  with  these  cases  will  be  material  to  the
Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.


<PAGE>




ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The  matters  discussed  in this Form  10-QSB  contain  certain  forward-looking
statements  and  involve  risks and  uncertainties  (including  changing  market
conditions,   competitive  and  regulatory   matters,   etc.)  detailed  in  the
disclosures  contained  in this  Form  10-QSB  and the  other  filings  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission made by the  Partnership  from time to time.
The  discussion  of  the  Partnership's  business  and  results  of  operations,
including  forward-looking  statements pertaining to such matters, does not take
into  account  the  effects of any  changes to the  Partnership's  business  and
results of operation.  Accordingly,  actual results could differ materially from
those  projected in the  forward-looking  statements  as a result of a number of
factors, including those identified herein.

The Partnership's  investment property consists of one apartment complex, Colony
of Springdale Apartments, located in Springdale, Ohio. The average occupancy for
the six  month  periods  ended  June  30,  2002  and  2001,  was  95%  and  89%,
respectively.  The increase in occupancy at The Colony of Springdale  Apartments
is due to a more aggressive marketing campaign.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's  net income for the six months  ended June 30,  2002  totaled
approximately  $34,000 compared to a net loss of approximately  $148,000 for the
corresponding  period of 2001. The Partnership realized net income for the three
months ended June 30, 2002 of  approximately  $30,000  compared to a net loss of
approximately  $63,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2001. The increase in
net  income  for the three  months  ended June 30,  2002 is  attributable  to an
increase in total revenues  partially  offset by an increase in total  expenses.
The  increase in net income for the six months  ended June 30, 2002 is due to an
increase in total  revenues  and a decrease in total  expenses.  The increase in
total  revenues  for  both the  three  and six  months  ended  June 30,  2002 is
attributable  to an  increase  in rental  income  and,  to a lesser  extent,  an
increase in other income. The increase in rental income is due to an increase in
occupancy  and a  decrease  in  concessions  offered  to  tenants  at  Colony of
Springdale  Apartments.  The  increase in other  income is  primarily  due to an
increase in utility  reimbursements,  partially offset by a decrease in interest
income due to lower average cash balances in interest bearing accounts.

The  increase in total  expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2002 is due
to an increase in property tax expense partially offset by a decrease in general
and administrative  expenses.  The decrease in total expenses for the six months
ended June 30,  2002 is the result of a decrease  in  operating  and general and
administrative expenses partially offset by an increase in property tax expense.
Operating  expenses  decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2002  primarily
due to a decrease in  maintenance  expenses  partially  offset by an increase in
property management fees. The decrease in maintenance  expenses is primarily due
to a decrease in contract services at the investment  property.  The increase in
property  management fees is primarily due to the increase in rental revenues at
the investment property. The increase in property tax expense for both the three
and six months  ended June 30,  2002 is due to the timing of the  receipt of the
tax bills,  which affected the recording of the associated  accrual at both June
30, 2002 and 2001.

The  decrease  in general  and  administrative  expenses  is due to the  special
management  fee of 9% on  distributions  from  operations  earned during the six
months ended June 30, 2001.  No such fee was earned  during the six months ended
June 30, 2002.  General and  administrative  expenses  also  decreased  due to a
decrease in the cost of services  included in the management  reimbursements  to
the General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement. Also included in
general and  administrative  expenses at both June 30, 2002 and 2001,  are costs
associated  with the  quarterly  and annual  communications  with  investors and
regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

The casualty gain is related to a fire at the property in August 2001. A gain of
approximately $43,000 was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2001. An
additional gain of  approximately  $18,000 was recognized  during the six months
ended June 30,  2002 due to the  receipt of  additional  insurance  proceeds  of
approximately $19,000, net of the write off of additional undepreciated property
improvements and replacements of approximately $1,000.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner
monitors the rental market environment of its investment  property to assess the
feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and
protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the
General  Partner  attempts  to  protect  the  Partnership  from  the  burden  of
inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a
high overall occupancy level. However, due to changing market conditions,  which
can  result in the use of rental  concessions  and rental  reductions  to offset
softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the General Partner will
be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2002, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$93,000  compared  to  approximately  $145,000 at June 30,  2001.  Cash and cash
equivalents  decreased by approximately  $147,000 since December 31, 2001 due to
approximately  $156,000  and $182,000 of cash used in  financing  and  investing
activities,  respectively,  partially offset by  approximately  $191,000 of cash
provided by operating activities. Cash used in financing activities consisted of
payments on advances from affiliates and principal payments made on the mortgage
encumbering  the  Partnership's  property  partially  offset  by  advances  from
affiliates. Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements
and  replacements   partially  offset  by  insurance  proceeds   received.   The
Partnership invests its working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating  needs of the Registrant and to comply with Federal,  state,
and local legal and regulatory  requirements.  Capital  improvements planned for
the Partnership's property are discussed below.

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2002,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $201,000 in budgeted and unbudgeted  capital  improvements at the
property.  Approximately $97,000 of these expenditures were repairs completed as
a result of a casualty  during 2001.  These  repairs were funded from  insurance
proceeds  received in 2001 and 2002.  The  improvements  consisted  primarily of
floor  covering  and  roof  replacements  and  structural  improvements.   These
improvements  were funded from operating cash flow.  Approximately  $166,000 has
been budgeted for capital improvements at Colony of Springdale for the year 2002
consisting  primarily  of  floor  covering,  roof,  appliance,  heating  and air
conditioning   unit   replacements  and  structural   improvements.   Additional
improvements may be considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the
property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property. The capital
expenditures  will be incurred only if cash is available from operations or from
Partnership  reserves. To the extent that such budgeted capital improvements are
completed,  the Registrant's  distributable  cash flow, if any, may be adversely
affected at least in the short term.

The Partnership's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs  (exclusive  of capital  improvements)  of the  Partnership.  The mortgage
indebtedness of approximately  $5,266,000 matures December 1, 2019 at which time
the mortgage is scheduled to be fully amortized.


<PAGE>



The Partnership  distributed  the following  amounts during the six months ended
June 30, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands except per unit data):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                      Six Months      Per Limited       Six Months      Per Limited
                        Ended         Partnership         Ended         Partnership
                    June 30, 2002         Unit        June 30, 2001         Unit

<S>                      <C>              <C>             <C>              <C>
Operations               $ --             $ --            $ 534            $ 2.83
</TABLE>

Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net cash generated from
operations,  the  availability  of cash  reserves  and the  timing  of the  debt
maturity,  refinancing and/or property sale. The Registrant's cash available for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis.  There can be no assurance that the
Partnership  will generate  sufficient  funds from  operations,  after  required
capital  expenditures,  to  permit  distributions  to its  partners  during  the
remainder of 2002 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interests in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 91,675 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 50.57% of the outstanding Units at
June 30, 2002. A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender offers
made by AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is possible  that AIMCO or its  affiliates
will acquire additional units of limited partnership interest in the Partnership
in  exchange  for  cash or a  combination  of cash and  units  in the  operating
partnership of AIMCO either through private  purchases or tender offers. In this
regard, on June 25, 2002, a tender offer by AIMCO  Properties,  L.P., to acquire
any and all of the units not owned by affiliates  of AIMCO for a purchase  price
of $2.00 per unit expired.  Pursuant to this offer,  AIMCO  acquired 2,877 units
during  the  quarter  ended  June 30,  2002.  Under the  Partnership  Agreement,
unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take action with
respect to a variety of matters which would include voting on certain amendments
to the  Partnership  Agreement  and voting to remove the General  Partner.  As a
result  of its  ownership  of  50.57% of the  outstanding  Units,  AIMCO is in a
position  to  control  all voting  decisions  with  respect  to the  Registrant.
Although the General  Partner owes fiduciary  duties to the limited  partners of
the Partnership,  the General Partner also owed fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its
sole  Stockholder.  As a result,  the duties of the General Partner,  as general
partner,  to the  Partnerships  and its limited  partners may come into conflict
with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO, as it sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The  investment  property is recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's   investment  property.  These  factors  include  changes  in  the
national,  regional and local economic  climate;  local  conditions,  such as an
oversupply  of  multifamily   properties;   competition   from  other  available
multifamily  property  owners and changes in market  rental  rates.  Any adverse
changes in these factors could cause an impairment in the Partnership's assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized monthly as it is earned. The
Partnership will offer rental concessions during  particularly slow months or in
response  to  heavy  competition  from  other  similar  complexes  in the  area.
Concessions are charged to income as incurred.



<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative  unitholders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the Partnership,  its General Partner and several of
their  affiliated  partnerships and corporate  entities.  The action purports to
assert  claims on behalf of a class of  limited  partners  and  derivatively  on
behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are
named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of
interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia  Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia;  past
tender offers by the Insignia  affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units;
management of the  partnerships  by the Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of
transactions  which  closed on October 1, 1998 and  February  26,  1999  whereby
Insignia and Insignia  Properties Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.
The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial
dissolution of the  Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General  Partner filed a
motion seeking dismissal of the action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the
plaintiffs  filed an amended  complaint.  The General Partner filed demurrers to
the amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case and an appeal was taken  from the order on  October  5,  2000.  On
December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff Cabraser  Heimann &
Bernstein  LLP as new  lead  counsel  for  plaintiffs  and the  putative  class.
Plaintiffs  filed a third  amended  complaint on January 19,  2001.  On March 2,
2001,  the  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the demurrer to the third
amended  complaint.  On July 10,  2001,  the Court  issued  an order  sustaining
defendants'  demurrer on certain grounds.  On July 20, 2001,  Plaintiffs filed a
motion for  reconsideration  of the Court's July 10, 2001 order granting in part
and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001, Plaintiffs filed
a fourth amended class and derivative action  complaint.  On September 12, 2001,
the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On October 5, 2001, the
General Partner and affiliated defendants filed a demurrer to the fourth amended
complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001. On February 2, 2002, the Court
served its order granting in part the demurrer.  The Court has dismissed without
leave  to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'  claims.  On  February  11,  2002,
plaintiffs  filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class  comprised of all
non-affiliated  persons  who own or have owned  units in the  partnerships.  The
General Partner and affiliated  defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002,
the Court held a hearing on plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took
the matter under submission after further briefing, as ordered by the court, was
submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002, the Court entered an order vacating
the  current  trial  date of  January  13,  2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and
discovery cut-off dates) and stayed the case in its entirety through November 7,
2002 so that the parties can have an opportunity to discuss settlement.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the General Partner and affiliated defendants
moved to strike the first  amended  complaint in its entirety for  violating the
Court's  July 10, 2001 order  granting  in part and denying in part  defendants'
demurrer in the Nuanes action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of
the  complaint  based on the statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the
action demurred to the fourth amended complaint,  and,  alternatively,  moved to
strike the  complaint.  On December  11, 2001,  the court heard  argument on the
motions and took the matters under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court
served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the Heller
complaint  as a violation  of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On
March 27, 2002, the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking the
complaint. The parties are currently in the midst of briefing that appeal.

The  General  Partner  does not  anticipate  that any  costs,  whether  legal or
settlement  costs,   associated  with  these  cases  will  be  material  to  the
Partnership's overall operations.



<PAGE>



ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a)    Exhibits:

                  3.1   Certificate  of Limited  Partnership,  incorporated  by
                        reference to the  Registration  Statement of  Registrant
                        filed October 22, 1984, as amended to date.

                  3.2   Agreement  of  Limited  Partnership,   incorporated  by
                        reference to the  Registration  Statement of  Registrant
                        filed October 22, 1984, as amended to date.

                  99    Certification of Chief  Executive   Officer   and  Chief
                        Financial Officer.

            b)    Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended June 30, 2002.




<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI


                                    By:   CONCAP EQUITIES, INC.
                                          General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Accounting Officer


                                    Date: August 14, 2002


<PAGE>


Exhibit 99


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                   Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated  Capital
Properties VI (the "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  Patrick J. Foye, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of
the Partnership, and Paul J. McAuliffe, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial
Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Name:  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Date:  August 14, 2002


                                           /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Name:  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Date:  August 14, 2002



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.