alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3011.4 Initial requests for records. ( a ) *Background.* The Freedom of Information Act Officer is authorized to: ( 1 ) Grant or deny requests for OFM records,
( 2 ) Make discretionary release of OFM records when the benefit to the public in releasing the document outweighs any harm likely to result from disclosure,
( 3 ) Reduce or waive fees to be charged where determined to be appropriate.
( b ) *Procedures.* This part provides the titles and mailing address of officials who are authorized to release records to the public. The normal working hours of these offices are 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., local time, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays, during which public inspection and copying of certain kinds of records is permitted. Persons wishing to request records from the Office of Finance and Management may do so by submitting each initial written request for OFM records to the appropriate OFM official shown below: ( 1 ) For records held at the Washington, DC Headquarters units, submit initial requests to the Freedom of Information Act Officer, Office of Finance and Management, USDA, 14th and Independence Ave., SW., Room 117-W, Administration Building, Washington, DC 20250-9000.
( 2 ) For records held at the National Finance Center in New Orleans, Louisiana, submit initial requests to the Freedom of Information Act Officer, National Finance Center, OFM, USDA, 13800 Old Gentilly Road, Building 350, (P.O. Box 60,000, New Orleans, LA 70160), New Orleans, Louisiana 70129.
If the requester is unable to determine the official to whom the request should be addressed, it should be submitted to the Headquarters Freedom of Information Act Officer who will refer such requests to the appropriate officials.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title 18 of the United States Code





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PharmAthene, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Charles A. Reinhart III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act.





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Charles A. Reinhart IIICharles A. Reinhart IIIChief Financial OfficerMay 11, 2011
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 155 East Tropicana, LLC, a Nevadalimited-liability company and 155 East Tropicana Finance Corp., a Nevadacorporation (collectively, the “Company”) for the three months ended September30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), Deborah J. Pierce, as Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Deborah J. Pierce   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Deborah  J. Pierce,      |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
| November  14, 2007       |

 

 

The foregoing certificationsare being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and are not being filedas part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1997, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,334,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,400
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      10,385,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,735,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,634,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          543,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,634,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               939,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  679,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (25,100)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                277,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            277,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   277,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     9.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 257 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 257

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide grant eligibility for 
a State that adopts a program for the impoundment of vehicles operated 
            by persons while under the influence of alcohol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 2005

 Mr. Corzine (for himself and Mr. Lautenberg) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide grant eligibility for 
a State that adopts a program for the impoundment of vehicles operated 
            by persons while under the influence of alcohol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``John's Law of 2005''.

SEC. 2. ALCOHOL-IMPAIRED DRIVING COUNTERMEASURES.

    Section 410(b)(1) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
                    ``(H) Program for impoundment of vehicles.--A 
                program to impound a vehicle for no less than 12 hours 
                that is operated by a person who is arrested for 
                operating the vehicle while under the influence of 
                alcohol.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 51.1825 Well formed.

*Well formed* means that the fruit has the characteristic tangerine shape and is not deformed.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2555 Reported in Senate (RS)]







                                                       Calendar No. 566
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2555

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, as the ``Lane Evans Post 
                           Office Building''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2006

 Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Obama) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             August 1, 2006

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, as the ``Lane Evans Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANE EVANS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lane Evans Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lane Evans 
Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 566

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2555

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, as the ``Lane Evans Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 2006

                       Reported without amendment`
[No. 8904.

Department Two.

December 12, 1910.]

#### A. D. McAdam, *Respondent,*v. C. E. Russell, *Appellant.*
      *1*

Appeal — Review—Harmless Error. Error in instructions are harmless where the jury was not misled, and the only question in the .case was one of law for the determination of the court.

Contracts — Building Contract — Performance. Failure to put saddle boards on the ridge pole of a house, when the total cost of doing so would not exceed one dollar, and which were not in the specifications and are not put on all houses, does not amount to nonperformance of a building contract preventing a recovery of the contract price.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Carey, J., entered November £0, 1909, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

Affirmed.

*Padgett fy*Bell, for appellant.

*Robert McMurchie,*for respondent.

Reported in 112 Pac. 345.

Pee Curiam.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff to recover the contract price agreed to be paid by defendant in the sum of $490, upon the completion of an addition to a certain building, besides the sum of five dollars as an extra. After the building was substantially completed, the plaintiff claiming that it was completed according to the contract on *177July 28, 1909, and the defendant claiming that there had been some slight failure to complete the building, it was destroyed by fire on August 2, without fault of either party it is conceded. ,. The defendant refused, on demand, to pay the contract price for the building. Trial was had, and a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

Appellant assigns as error some of the instructions of the court. But we think the instructions correctly stated the law, with the possible exception of the use of the words “preponderance of testimony” in one of them, and we feel certain, from an examination of the whole instruction, that the jury were in no way misled by this. In any event they become immaterial, for the reason that this case really presents a question of law rather than of fact, as under the conceded facts the only thing that was left to be done by the contractor was the putting of what are called “saddle boards” on the ridge of the roof. While we think the jury rightly reached the conclusion from the evidence that such boards were not necessary for the completion of the building, and were not within the contemplation of the contract, at the most this was too trifling a matter for the law to take notice of, the testimony being that the whole cost of the saddle boards, including labor and material, would not exceed one dollar. The testimony shows that these boards were not put on all houses. They were not called for in the specifications, and it was a matter of choice whether or not they should be put on. At most it was a trifling omission, and we think one which was seized upon by the appellant to aid him in escaping from the payment of a just debt.

The judgment is affirmed.
201 3 Electric Integrated

Resource Plan

Appendix C

– 201 3 Electric IRP

Avista Electric Conservation Potential Assessment Study
#### § 4284.1011 Evaluation screening.

The Agency will conduct an initial screening of all proposals to determine whether the applicant is eligible and whether the application is complete and sufficiently responsive to the requirements set forth in the applicable RFP so as to allow for an informed review. Incomplete or non-responsive applications will not be evaluated further, and may be returned to the applicant. Applicants may revise their applications and re-submit them prior to the published deadline if there is sufficient time to do so.
161 So.2d 279

#### Wilbur Joseph CORMIER v. TRADERS & GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 47161.

March 11, 1964.

Court of Appeal, Third Circuit.

159 So.2d 746.

Writ granted. Limited solely to the question of quantum awarded to Mrs. Fontenot.
Case 3:20-cv-05911-RV-HTC Document 5 Filed 11/05/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:20-cv-05911-RV-HTC Document 5 Filed 11/05/20 Page 2 of 2
#### Harold Peck et al., Respondents, v Ernst Brothers, Inc., Appellant.

— Appeal from an order' of the County Court of Saratoga County, entered October 5, 1978, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment in favor of plaintiffs. Even though defendant promptly moved to vacate the instant default judgment, it is not entirely without significance that there had been a prior default in the same action. While plaintiffs consented to have the former judgment vacated, it was not unreasonable to expect that defendant would avoid future lapses. Accordingly, when defendant failed to appear on the scheduled trial date, we do not believe the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to accept the excuse offered by its attorney that the pendency thereof had escaped his attention. Moreover, defendant’s moving papers fail to elaborate any evidentiary detail tending to demonstrate the existence of a meritorious defense. Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

AssignmentsComputer Uses in EducationElementary Secondary EducationHomeworkInternetNational StandardsParent ParticipationParent RoleResource MaterialsScience CurriculumScience EducationStudy Habits

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29661]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION


Founding Fathers Advisory Committee (FFAC)

AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), and the Presidential Historical Records 
Preservation Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-404), the National Archives and 
Records Administration (NARA) announces the inaugural meeting of the 
Founding Fathers Advisory Committee. The Committee will advise the 
Archivist of the United States on the progress of the Founding Fathers 
editorial projects funded by the National Historical Publications and 
Records Commission (NHPRC), the grant making arm of the National 
Archives. The meeting will discuss the goals and purposes of the 
committee, how it will proceed with its work, and anticipated future 
accomplishments.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, December 13, 2010 from 2 
p.m. to 3:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Archives and Records Administration, 700 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Archivist's Board Room, Room 119, Washington, 
DC 20408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting will be open to the public. 
However, due to space limitations and access procedures, the name, 
email address, and telephone number of individuals planning to attend 
must be submitted to the National Archives no later than Tuesday, 
December 7. NARA staff will provide additional instructions for gaining 
access to the location of the meeting. Please RSVP to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c1f140e150f0815121952180912141d113c121d0e1d521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3c5f544e554f4855525912584952545d517c525d4e5d125b534a">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 357-5094.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Williams, Executive Director 
of the NHPRC, National Archives Building, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Room 106, Washington, DC 20408, telephone number: (202) 357-5010, or at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#acc7cdd8c4c0c9c9c282dbc5c0c0c5cdc1dfecc2cddecd82cbc3da"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4cfc5d0ccc8c1c1ca8ad3cdc8c8cdc5c9d7e4cac5d6c58ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 17, 2010.
Mary Ann Hadyka,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-29661 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 47
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 64 FR 38108, July 15, 1999.

§ 47.17 Subpoenas. ( a ) *Issuance of subpoenas.* The attendance of witnesses and the production of documentary evidence from any place in the United States on behalf of any party to the proceeding may, by subpoena, be required at any designated place of hearing or at any designated place for the taking of a deposition. Subpoenas may be issued by the Secretary, or by the examiner, over the facsimile signature of the Secretary upon a reasonable showing by the applicant of the grounds, necessity, and reasonable scope thereof. Except for good cause shown, applications for subpoenas shall be filed with the Hearing Clerk at least 30 days prior to the designated date of hearing or deposition. Except for good cause shown, the examiner shall not issue subpoenas less than 20 days prior to the designated date of hearing or deposition.
( b ) *Application for subpoena duces tecum.* Subpoenas for the production of documentary evidence shall be issued only upon a verified written application. Such application shall specify, as exactly as possible, the documents desired and shall show their competency, relevancy, materiality, and the necessity for their production.
( c ) *Service of subpoenas.* Subponeas may be served by any person not less than 18 years of age. The party at whose instance a subponea is issued shall be responsible for service thereof. Subpoenas shall be served as provided in § 47.4.
[10 FR 2209, Feb. 27, 1945; 11 FR 224, Jan. 4, 1946; 19 FR 57, Jan. 6, 1954, as amended at 38 FR 30445, Nov. 5, 1973; 56 FR 175, Jan. 3, 1991; 60 FR 8462, Feb. 14, 1995; 64 FR 38107, July 15, 1999]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Willie J. Smith, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered December 15,1978, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Defendant’s motion to suppress certain physical evidence was properly denied (see *People v Finlayson,*76 AD2d 670). His remaining contentions are also without merit. Damiani, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. Case No: 5:96cr20/LAC

MARK HARRIS

_____________________________/

ORDER

This cause is before the court on defendant’s notice of appeal (doc. 124) of the

court’s order denying his motion pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) and his motion for

reconsideration of the denial of that motion. (Doc. 121 & 123). The court construes his

notice of appeal as a request for a certificate of appealability. Edwards v. United States,

114 F.3d 1083 (11th Cir. 1997). Unless a certificate of appealability is issued, the

defendant may not take an appeal from the final order denying Rule 60(b) relief. Gonzalez

v. Secretary of Department of Corrections, 317 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11th Cir. 2003). Such a

certificate may issue “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of

a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123

S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Because the defendant has not made a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, his request for a certificate of

appealability is DENIED.

Case 5:96-cr-00020-LC-MD Document 128 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 5:96cr20/LAC

No motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been filed. The defendant

has not shown that the appeal is taken in good faith or that he is otherwise entitled to so

proceed on appeal. Therefore, he shall pay the $455.00 filing fee within thirty days.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of September, 2006.

s/L.A. Collier 

 LACEY A. COLLIER

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:96-cr-00020-LC-MD Document 128 Filed 09/28/06 Page 2 of 2
Part 20 - Reserved

Parent topic: Federal Acquisition Regulation