### SUPPORTING STATEMENT PART A: **INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST**

**FOR THE GREENHOUSE GAS**  **REPORTING PROGRAM**

**OMB Control No. 2060**  **- 0629**  **EPA ICR No. 23**  **0 0.10** **TABLE OF CONTENTS**

1. ID ENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION
................................ .... 1 1(a) Title of the Information Collection
................................ ................................ ................. 1 1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract
................................ ................................ ..................... 1 2. NEED FOR AND USE OF THE COLLECTION
................................ ........................... 2 2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection
................................ ................................ .................. 2 2(b) Practical Utility

/Users of the Data
................................ ................................ ................. 2 3. NONDUPLICATION, CONSULTATIONS, AND OTHER COLLECTION CRITERIA
................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 4 3(a) Nonduplication
................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 4 3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to Information Collection Request (ICR) Submissions to OMB
................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ 6 3(c) Consultations
................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 9 3(d) Effects o f Less Frequent Collection
................................ ................................ ............. 11 3(e) General Guidelines
................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 11 3(f) Confidentiality
................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 11 3(g) Sensitive Questions
................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 12 4. THE RESPONDENTS AND THE INFORMATION REQUESTED
........................... 12 4(a) Respondents/North American Industrial Classification Systems (NAICS) Codes
...... 13 4(b) Information Requested
................................ ................................ ................................ . 16 5. THE INFORMATION COLLECTED

– AGENCY ACTIVITIES, COLLECTI ON METHODS, AND INFORMATI ON MANAGEMENT
................................ .............................. 22 5(a) Agency

Activities
................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 22 5(b) Collection Methodology and Management
................................ ................................ .. 22 5(c) Small Entity

Flexibility
................................ ................................ ................................ 23 5(d) Collection Schedule
................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 24 6. ESTIMATING THE BURDEN AND COST OF THE COLLECTION
....................... 24 6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden
................................ ................................ .................... 25 6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs
................................ ................................ ....................... 25 6(c) Estimating Agency

Burden and Cost
................................ ................................ ........... 27 6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs
.............................. 28 6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Costs
................................ ................................ .......... 28 6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden
................................ ................................ ...................... 29 6(g) Burden Statement
................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 32**LIST OF APPEND ICES** 

A. Current Information Collection Requests Associated with the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program B. Notice of Proposed Collection and Request for Comment: Information Collection Request for the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program; EPA ICR No. 2300.10 (77 FR 28376, May 14, 2012) C. Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: Reporting Thresholds and Reporting Requirements D. Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: Recordkeeping Requirements E. Burden and Cost by Subpart and Year, All Subparts and All Activities F. Summary of Labor Rate Derivation G. Burden and Cost for “Track 1” Subparts G
- 1. Detailed Burden and Cost for “Track 1” Subparts G
- 2. Summary of Burden and Cost for “Track 1” Subparts by Activity and Year G
- 3. Change in Burden and Cost f or “Track 1” Subparts H. Burden and Cost for Magnesium Production, Underground Coal Mines, Industrial Wastewater Treatment, and Industrial Waste Landfills (Subparts T, FF, II, and TT) H
- 1. Detailed Burden and Cost for Magnesium Production, Underground Co al Mines, Industrial Wastewater Treatment, and Industrial Waste Landfills (Subparts T, FF, II, and TT) H
- 2. Summary of Burden and Cost for Magnesium Production, Underground Coal Mines, Industrial Wastewater Treatment, and Industrial Waste Landfills (Subparts T, FF, II, and TT) by Activity and Year H
- 3. Change in Burden and Cost for Magnesium Production, Underground Coal Mines, Industrial Wastewater Treatment, and Industrial Waste Landfills (Subparts T, FF, II, and TT) I. Burden and Cost for Petroleum and N atural Gas Systems (Subpart W) I
- 1. Detailed Unit Burden and Costs for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems (Subpart W) I
- 2. Summary of Burden and Cost for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems (Subpart W) by Activity and Year I
- 3. Change in Burden and Cost for P etroleum and Natural Gas Systems (Subpart W) J. Burden and Cost for Additional Sources of Fluorinated GHG (Subparts I, L, DD, QQ, and SS) J
- 1. Detailed Unit Burden and Cost for Additional Sources of Fluorinated GHG (Subparts I, L, DD, QQ, and SS) J
- 2. Summary of Burden and Cost for Additional Sources of Fluorinated GHG (Subparts I, L, DD, QQ, and SS) J
- 3. Change in Burden and Cost for Additional Sources of Fluorinated GHG (Subparts I, L, DD, QQ, and SS)K. Burden and Cost for Injection and Geologic Seq uestration of Carbon Dioxide (Subparts RR and UU) K
- 1. Detailed Unit Burden and Cost for Injection and Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide (Subparts RR and UU) K
- 2. Summary of Burden and Cost for Cost for Injection and Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide (Subparts RR and UU) K
- 3. Change in Burden and Cost for Injection and Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide (Subparts RR and UU) L. Burden and Cost for the Provision of Information on Parent Companies, NAICS Codes, and Whether Emissions are from Cogeneration L
- 1. Summary of Burden and Cost for the Provision of Information on Parent Companies, NAICS Codes, and Whether Emissions are from Cogeneration L
- 2. Change in Burden and Cost for the Provision of Information on Parent Companies, NAICS Code s, and Whether Emissions are from Cogeneration M. Burden and Cost for the Provision of Information on Mobile Sources M
- 1. Summary of Burden and Cost for the Provision of Information on Mobile Sources M
- 2. Change in Burden and Cost for the Provision of Information on Mobile SourcesICR for the GHGRP Page 1 **SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR**  **THE GREENHOUSE GAS REPORTING PROGRAM**

**EPA ICR # 2300.10** 
**1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION**  **1(a) Title of the Information Collection** TITLE: Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (Renewal) ICR Number: 2300.10 OMB Control Number : 2060
- 0629 **1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract** In response to the FY2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act (H.R. 2764; Public L aw 110
- 161) and under authority of the Clean Air Act (CAA) , EPA finalized a greenhouse gas reporting rule in October of 2009 (henceforth referred to as the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program or GHGRP ) (74 FR 56260; October 30, 2009). The Rule, which became effective on December 29, 2009, requires reporting of greenhouse gas es ( GHGs ) from certain facilities and suppliers
. It does not require control of greenhouse gases. Instead, it requires that sources emitting above certain threshold levels of carbon dioxide ( CO 2 ) equivalent ( CO 2 e) monitor and report emissions. Subsequent rules provide corrections and clarification on existing requirements (e.g., modif y reporting deadlines, amend calculation methodologies and data reporting requirements, clarif y rule provisions and compliance obligations, and correc t technical an d editorial errors); include requirements for additional facilities suppliers, and mobile sources ; require reporters to provide information about parent companies, N orth American Industry Classification System (NAICS ) code(s), and whether emissions are fro m cogeneration; and finalize confidentiality business information (CBI) determinations
. The Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB’s) approval of the Information Collection Request (I CR) for the GHG Reporting Rule expires on November 30, 2012. The purpose for this ICR is to renew and revise the GHG Reporting Rul e ICR to update and combine the burdens and costs imposed by all of the current I CRs under the GHGRP
. Appendix A summarizes the I CRs associated with the GHGRP
. Th e decrease in burden reflects the completion of one - time activities that occurred in the firs t year of data collection and a reduction in the number of respondents.ICR for the GHGRP Page 2

**2. NEED FOR AND USE OF THE COLLECTION**  **2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection** Signed into law o n December 26, 2007, the FY200 8 Consolidated Appropriations A ct (henceforth referred to as the “Appropriations Act”) directed EPA to “ develop and publish a draft rule not later than 9 months after the date of enactment of this Act, and a final rule not later than 18 months aft er the date of enactment of this Act, to require mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions above appropriate thresholds in all sectors of the economy of the United States. ” The accompanying explanatory statement further directed EPA to “use its ex isting authority under the Clean Air Act” (CAA) to develop a GHG reporting rule. “ The Agency is further directed to include in its rule reporting of emissions resulting from upstream production and downstream sources, to the extent that the Administrator d eems it appropriate. The Administrator shall determine appropriate thresholds of emissions above which reporting is required, and how frequently reports shall be submitted to EPA. The Administrator shall have discretion to use existing reporting requirements for electric generating units under Section 821 ” of the 1990 CAA amendments. Sections 114 and 208 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) provide EPA authority to require the information mandated b y the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) because such data wil l inform and are relevant to future policy decisions. CAA section 114(a)(1) authorizes the Administrator to require emissions sources, persons subject to the CAA, or persons whom the Administrator believes may have necessary

information to monitor and repo rt emissions and provide such other information the Administrator requests for the purposes of carrying out any provision of the CAA (except for a provision of title II with respect to manufacturers of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines). Section 208 of the CAA provides EPA with similar authority

regarding the manufacturers of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines, and other persons subject to the requirements of parts A and C of title II. For these reasons, the Administrator may requ est that a person, on a one

- time, periodic or continuous basis, establish and maintain records, make reports, install and operate monitoring equipment and, among other things, provide such information the Administrator may reasonabl y require. Because EPA does not yet know the specific policies that will be adopted, the data reported under the GHGRP is of sufficient quality to inform policy

and program development. The requirements in the GHGRP maximize the amount of emissions reported while excluding small emitters and are consistent with existing GHG reporting programs in order to reduce reporting burden for all parties involved. Also, consistent with the Appropriations Act, the GHGRP covers a broad range of sectors of the economy
. **2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data**  The GHGRP collects information from facilities that directl y emit GHGs and from suppliers of products that release GHGs if combusted, oxidized, or used. The comprehensive GHG data reported directly from large facilities and suppliers across the country are now easil yICR for the GHGRP Page 3

accessible to the public at: http://ghgdata.epa.gov/ghgp/main.do
. Reporting entities use uniform methods for estimating emissions, which enables data to be compared and anal yz ed. EPA’s online data publication tool allows users to view and sort GHG data for calendar ye ar 2010 from over 6,000 entities in a variety of ways, including by location, industrial sector, and the type of GHG emitted. Data collection in the GHGRP complements the Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks (Inventory) and can help EPA transition to use of the 2006 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. EPA presented the GHGRP dataset in the most recent Inventory (published in April 2012). Transparent, public data on emissions allows for accountability of polluters to the public stakeholders who bear the cost of the polluti on. This powerful data resource provide s a critical tool for communities to identify nearb y sources of GHGs and provide information to state and local governments. The standardization of GHG data provides businesses with the necessary information to benchmark themselves against similar facilities, better understand their relative standing within their industry , and achieve and disseminate their environmental achievem ents. B usinesses and other innovators can use the data to determin e their GHG footprints, find cost

- and fuel

- saving efficiencies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions (e.g., through energy audits or other forms of assistance) , and foster technologies to protect public health and the environment
. The facility

- specific GHG emissions data improve the understanding of the factors that influence GHG emission rates as well as the actions that facilities take to reduce emissions. The facility

- based data can be aggregated to the corporate level in order to track emis sion trends from industries, within industries , and across industries over time, particularly in response to policies and potential regulations. In formation collected from the oil and gas facilities (in subpart W) and CO 2 injection faciliti es (in subparts RR and UU) allow s EPA to gain a better understanding of the entire CO 2 capture and sequestration (CCS) system
. In formation collected from fluorocarbons allows EPA to assess the overall volume and importance of compounds for which global warming potentials (GWPs ) have not been evaluated and help identify

which compounds should have their GWPs evaluated first
. Inaddition, historical reports in tons of chemical can be converted into CO 2 e , provided GWPs have been identified for these compounds
. Without this comprehensive reporting requirement, such historical information could be lost
. The GHGRP is not intended to be a survey and the respondents affected b y the program are not intended to be a statis tical sample of a larger universe of entities
. EPA does not intend to use the data collected under the GHGRP to characterize non

- reporting entities or to draw statistical inferences about a larger population.ICR for the GHGRP Page 4

**3. NONDUPLICATION, CONSULTATIONS, A** **ND OTHER C O**  **LLECTION CRITERIA**  **3(a) Nonduplication**  EPA evaluated existing GHG programs and the GHG data currently available to determine whether this request duplicates other information collections. In developing the GHGRP, EPA reviewed monitoring methods including:

 Federal programs within the United States , such as the Inventory , the U.S. Department of Energy ’s ( DOE’s ) Energy Information Administration ’s (EIA ’s ) 1605b program, the Acid Rain Program, EPA Natural Gas STAR Program , and voluntary GHG partnership programs;

 State and regional GHG reporting programs , such as The Climate Registry , the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, the Western Regional Air Partnership , and programs in several states including California, New Mexico, Connecticut, and New Jersey ;

 Reporting protocols developed by nongovernmental organizations, such as the World Resources Institute/World Business Council for Sustainable Development; and

 Programs from industrial trade organizations, such a s the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America ’s GHG Emission Estimation Guidelines , the American Petroleum Institute’s Compendium of GHG Estimation Methodologies for the Oil and Gas Industry , and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development ’s Cement Sustainability

Initiative’s CO 2 A ccounting and Reporting Standard for the Cement Industry
. These are important programs that not only led the way

in reporting of GHG emissions before the federal government acted but also assist ed in quantifying the GHG reductions achieved b y various po licies
. Many of these programs collect different or additional data as compared to the GHGRP
. For example, state programs may establish lower thresholds for reporting, request information on areas not addressed in the GHGRP , or include different data elements to support other programs (e.g., offsets)
. While some programs collect similar information on GHG emissions , the Agency has determined that the GHGRP supplement s and complement s , rather than duplicate s , existing programs’ data. Further, EPA has made significant efforts over the past 4 ye ars to facilitate the reporting in the event a single entity has to report both the federal and state level. For example, EPA has supported efforts b y the California Air Resources Board to harmonize the reporting of information under California’s Global Warming Solutions Act, AB32 with EPA’s GHGRP . The product of the collaboration is referred to as California Electronic Greenhouse Gas Reporting Tool, or Cal e

- GGRT. D ocument ation of EPA’s review of GHG monitoring protocols used by federal and state voluntary and mandatory GHG programs a s well as GHG reporting rules can be found in theICR for the GHGRP Page 5

docket at EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2008
- 0508
- 056
. For further discussion on the relationship of the GHGRP to other programs, please refer to the pre ambles of each of the GHGRP rulemakings , the June 6, 2008 memorandum entitled Review of Existing Programs (which can be found in the docket at EPA

- HQ
- OAR
- 2008
- 0508
- 005 2 ) , and the January 27, 200 9 memorandum entitled Review of Existing State Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rules (which can be found in the docket at EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2008
- 05 08
- 0054)
. Some GHG programs are described below:

 A number of EPA ’s voluntary partnership programs include a GHG emissions and/or reductions reporting component (e.g., Natural Gas STAR program , etc.). However, the GHGRP has much broader coverage than the voluntary programs and therefore help s EPA learn more about emissions from facilities not included in current programs.

 EPA considered CO 2 data currently collected under Section 821 of the 1990 CAA Amendments. To avoid duplication and because the Acid Rain program already requires reporting of high quality CO 2 data from electrical generating units (EGUs), the GHGRP allows for use of the same CO 2 data rather than requiring additional reporting of CO 2 from EGUs. Facility operators do, however, have to report the emissions of GHGs that are not included under Section 821, such as methane ( CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O )
.
 EPA reviewed the Inventory , which is an annual comprehensive top

- down assessment of national greenhouses gas emissions
. While the Inventory is generall y compiled from national surveys (i.e., not broken down at the geographic or facility level ) , the GHGRP focus es on bottom

- up data from individual facilities that exceed appropriate thresholds
. The bottom

- up approach to data collection in the GHGRP can help reduce uncertainty in emissions estimates for specific industries, and more broadly, help s EPA transition to use of the 2006 IP CC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, which will be required to meet international reporting obligations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in the near future.

 EPA published the Federal Requirements Under the Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program for Carbon Dioxide Geologic Sequestration (GS) Wells Final Rule (henceforth referred to as the “GS Rule”) (75 FR 77230, December 10, 2010)
. EPA determined that the GHGRP is complementary to and builds on EPA’s UI C permit requirements. Requirements under the UIC program are focused on demonstrating that underground sources of drinking water are not endangered as a result of CO 2 injection into the subsurface, while re quirements under the GHGRP through subpart RR enable reporters to quantify the amount of CO 2 that is geologicall y sequestered. For example, the UIC Class VI permit (including the Testing and Monitoring Plan) and subpart RR ’s monitoring, reporting, and veri fication plan have separate monitoring objectives.

 EPA reviewed the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Notice 2009

- 83 Credit for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration under Section 45Q. To claim the credit, a taxpayer must follow general monitoring and verification principles, calculate CO 2 sequestered in the fiscalICR for the GHGRP Page 6 ye ar using a mass

-balance equation, and report to IRS the amount of qualified CO 2 sequestered in the fiscal year. However, the level of reporting and transparency of the IRS data collected would not meet the verification needs of the GHGRP . Th e IRS reporting requirement expire s after 75 million metric tons of CO 2 is reported as sequestered to IR S , data reporting is only as robust as to meet the standards in the case of an IRS audit , and the IRS does not outline procedures for quantifying and reporting any CO 2 leakage that may occur as is necessary

for th e rule. Therefore, EPA has concluded that the IR S data would not meet the needs outlined in the GHGRP
. As noted in the I CR for the 2009 GHG Reporting Rule , a number of programs at the state, trib al, t erritorial , and l ocal level require emission sources in their respective jurisdictions to monitor and report GHG emissions. To reduce burden on reporters and program agencies, the Agency plans to share emission s data with the exception of any CBI with relevant agencies or approved entities using, where practical, shared tools , and infrastructure. **3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to Information**  **Collection Request ( ICR** **) Submissions to OMB**  As part of the Federal Register notice on each of the rulemakings under the GHGRP , EPA solicited comments on the proposed rules, the estimates in the proposed I CRs, and specific aspects of the information collection , as described below: 1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency , including whether the information would have practical utility ; 2) Whether the Agency ’s burden estimate is accur ate , including the validity of the methodology

and assumptions used; 3) How to enhance the quality , utility , and clarity of the information to be collected; and 4) How to minimize the burden on respondents, including use of appropriate automated electronic, mech anical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology
. Across all the ICRs associated with the GHGRP, EPA receive d only a couple of comments that specifically addressed the proposed I CR s, as follows
. EPA received one comment about the April 2010 proposed ICR for s ubpart W
. The commenter stated that use of CAA Section 114 as the basis for the rule runs counter to its longstanding use which has been limited to issuing I CRs and that ICRs are limited to collecting data from specific sources over a discrete period of time
. EPA determined that this comment confuses CAA Section 114 and I CR requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. EPA received two written comments that questioned the need for EPA to collect parent company information under the Corporate ID Rule Amendment . One commenter submitted that company affiliation should not be used as a factor in policy development. The other commenter’s primary objection was that EPA had been vague and non

- specific in justifying collection ofICR for the GHGRP Page 7

parent company information , i.e., that EPA’s authority to collect information under Section 114 is limited by

the requirements of Paperwork Reduction Act (5 C.F.R. 1320) under which EPA must demonstrate that the requested inform ation has “practical utility .” EPA explained that S ection 114 of the CAA is sufficiently broad for EPA to collect this information. In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 USC 3501 , et seq.), EPA solicited public comment on this GHGRP IC R for a 60

- day period before it was submitted to OMB. Specificall y, EPA published a notice in the Federal Register (FR) requesting comment on the estimated respondent burden and other aspects of this I CR ( 77 FR 28376, May 14, 2014) ( see Appendix B ). EPA received one written comment about the GHGRP Renewal I CR. The commenter presented data from oil and gas sectors and asserted that EPA significantly underestimate d the burden b y as much as an order of magnitude or more . The commenter provided the following reasons for the underestimation of burden: EPA uses average industrial labor rates, neglects significant contributors that cause variability in burden (e.g., facility size and complexity ), and miscalculated burden hours
. EPA responded in the following manner. In response to the commenter, EPA ad justed labor estimates for the oil and gas industry to reflect the higher labor costs for the industry . EPA notes that the Agency ’s overall methodology and assumptions were sound and relied on best available data to estimate the costs. Overall, EPA has determined that the cost estimates provided by the commenter do not take into consideration the completion of one

- time activities that occurred in the first year of data collection. The commenter is providing cost estimates for the 2010 and 2011 reporting years. These cost estimates are directly comparable to cost estimates EPA made for the 2010 and 2011 reporting year ICRs. In EPA’s cost estimates, EPA assumed the startup costs would be incurred during the first year of reporting. For Subpart W, the first ye ar of reporting is the 2011 reporting ye ar. In the renewal ICR, EPA is not including the startup costs for the 2013 through 2015 reporting years because the startup costs should already be assumed b y the facility. Even in cases of facilities using BAMM, startup costs should be assumed prior to the 2013 reporting year. These costs will include the labor burden of planning, registration, and installing required equipment to comply

with the rule. In comparing the commenter’s cost estimates to EPA’s cost estimates for the 2010 and 2011 reporting year, EPA finds that the commenter’s cost estimates are comparable to EPA’s cost estimate. Even for facilities that used BAMM, it is expected that the majority

of the startup costs would occur within the first couple years of reporting. As the startup costs were already included in the 2011 model year IC R costs, EPA finds that it would be duplicative to include the startup costs for the 2013 reporting year and beyond. While it is possible that facilities will apply for BAMM for 2013 and beyond, EPA anticipates that the use of BAMM in 2013 and beyond would not result in a burden increase. EPA’s estimate of labor hours is based on previous analy ses of the costs of monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping for other rules; information from the industry characterization on the number of units or process inputs and outputs to be monitored; and engineering judgment by industry and EPA industry

experts and engineers. While the commenter provided a generalICR for the GHGRP Page 8

categorization of the s ize of facilities in each segment, the cost estimates were onl y provided at the facility

level, and EPA cannot evaluate if the facilities are representative of the industry as a whole. While the costs provided by the commenter are in some cases significantly higher than EPA’s estimates, EPA is unable to determine from the commenter’s submitted data what costs are incurred as a result of Part 98 and what costs are the result of normal business practices. Complete details of the cost analyses are found in th e Appendix E of the Renewal ICR, the regulatory

impact analysis (RIA) for the final rule, and the economic impact anal ys is (EIA) for Subpart W. The Technical Support Documents (TSDs) for each source category provide a discussion of the applicable measurement technologies and any existing programs and practices. The commenter also urged EPA to consider how to reduce burden on reporters. The commenter suggested that EPA sunset the reporting program, pull back to a less frequent reporting , or use a more focu sed approach that centers on the most significant emitting sources. EPA has determined that it is appropriate to gather the information on an annual basis given the strong public interest in facility level emissions data, the breadth of potential uses of the information, and the program's purpose to provide accurate and timely information to inform future policy

making decisions. Should EPA find it appropriate to revise the reporting requirements in the future, it will occur as a result of a notice and co mment rulemaking. In order to minimize burden in the future, EPA is committed to working with stakeholders to coordinate implementation of reporting programs, reduce burden on reporters, provide timely access to verified emissions data, establish mechanism s to efficientl y share data, and harmonize data systems to the extent possible. The commenter expressed other concern s, e.g., that EPA is over

- reaching its authority under CAA Sections 114 and 208. EPA responded that its exercise of its authority under S ections 114 and 208 of the CAA is reasonable, relevant to the purpose, not overl y broad, and not unreasonabl y disruptive. The complete response to comment document can be found in the docket (EPA
- HQ
OAR
- 2012
- 0333 ). An additional FR notice will be publis hed prior to submission of this GHGRP IC R to OMB. The public comment period for this additional notice is 30 days.ICR for the GHGRP Page 9

**3(c) Consultations**  In developing the GHG Reporting Rule , EPA established several Agency workgroups , conducted a proactive communications outreach program , and met with federal agencies
. EPA established several Agency workgroup s to develop the reporting requirements for the GHG emitting processes within each of seven categories of processes that emit greenhouse gases
. These workgroups addres sed: (1) Fossil Fuel Combustion: Stationary , (2) Fossil Fuel Combustion: Mobile, (3) Fuel Suppliers, (4) Industrial Processes, (5) Industrial GHG Suppliers, (6) Fossil Fuel Fugitive Emissions, and (7) Biological Processes. An eighth workgroup develop ed the electronic data reporting s ys tem. The Climate Change Division within the Office of Atmospheric Programs coordinated the eight workgroups. Prior to developing the proposed 2009 rule, e ach of the workgroups performed a comprehensive review of existing voluntary and mandatory GHG reporting programs, as well as guidance documents for quantifying greenhouse gas emissions from specific sources. A list of these reviews can be found in Section 3(a) above. The workgroups also reviewed international programs, including the IPCC , the EU Emissions Trading System, the Australian GHG Reporting S ys tem, and the Canadian Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. In reviewing these programs, EPA anal yz ed the sectors covered, reporting thresholds, monitoring or emission s estimating methods used, quality assur anc e measures , the point of monitoring, data input needs, and information that respondents must report or retain
. During the development of the GHG Reporting Rule , EPA conducted a proactive communications outreach p rogram to inform the public about the rule development effort. Prior to the proposal signature, EPA staff held more than 100 meetings with stakeholders, including:

 Trade associations and firms in potentially affected industries/sectors;

 State, local, and trib al environmental control agencies and regional air quality planning organizations;

 State and regional organizations already involved in GHG emissions reporting, such as The Climate Registry , California Air Resources Board, and the Western Climate Ini tiative; and

 Environmental groups and other nongovernmental organizations. EPA also met with federal agencies , including DOE and the U.S. Department of Agriculture , which have programs relevant to GHG emissions. After the proposed GHG Reporting Rule was signed on March 10, 2009 (74 FR 16448 ; April 10, 2009 ), EPA held two public hearings, received approximately 16,800 written public comments, and met with over 4,000 people and 135 groups. Details of these meetings are available in the docket (EPA

- HQ
- OAR
- 2008
- 0508).ICR for the GHGRP Page 10

EPA has been continuously updating the GHGRP and providing technical correction s based on feedback. Specifically , EPA has been working closely with owners and operators of facilities subject to the GHGRP to communicate reporting re quirements. Through these discussions, EPA has identified specific sections of the GHGRP that were either not clear or did not have the intended effect. EPA has amended specific provisions to resolve issues raised during implementation and to correct technical and editorial errors that have been identified since publication. Some of these amendments affected burden, but most amendments reduced burden or did not affect it
. In addition to correcting and clarifying existing requirements , EPA has amended the GHGRP in other ways based o n public comments and stakeholder feedback, e.g., promulgated rulemakings that re

-propose certain subparts, add ed requirements for new facilities and supplier s, and added reporting requirements that provide information about parent companies
. Each action has had separate IC Rs a s noted in Appendix A
. As noted in Section 3(b) above, EPA received one written comment about the GHGRP Renewal ICR as part of the public notice required p rior to I CR s ubmissions to OMB . In addition, a s part of the required consultations, EPA contacted four reporters and asked for feedback on the supporting statement. EPA contacted Carter Kell y of Waste Management, Niki Wuestenberg of Republic Services, Nicole Roper of PCS Nitrogen, and Lorraine Anderson of Shell Chemical. We did not receive feedback from either PCS Nitrogen or Shell Chemical. Waste Management and Republic Services both provided feedback. The feedback we received generall y indicated that these companies believed the cost estimates provided b y EPA were too low. The major factor influencing the cost from both companies was the frequency of monitoring required for estimating emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills (Subpart HH). EPA disagrees with the feedback provided. In making the cost estimates, EPA assumes that the operators will pick the lowest cost operations for monitoring emissions. Part of this assumption includes that landfill operators will be visiting the landfills at least once a week under normal operation to check on and maintain equipment. The majority of landfills in the US are active, and would not require additional visits to monitor emissions. Neither Waste Management nor Republic Services provided feedback on what percent of facilities required traveling to take weekly measurements, therefore EPA was unable to update the costs using best information. It was also not clear from the feedback what proportion of landfills are required to do weekl y monitoring. In addition, higher than estimated cost estimates were provided on the time it takes to submit e

- GGRT reports. During the first year of reporting EPA estimated a higher burden to compile and QA annual reports, but for the future submissions, EPA anticipates that companies will be more efficient in submitting reports as w ell as the reports having fewer errors and this is reflected in the renewal ICR. As a result, EPA is not changing the cost estimates for the ICR based on the received feedback. The feedback we received also urged EPA to consider how to reduce burden on reporters. EPA is committed to working with stakeholders to coordinate implementation of reporting programs, reduce burden on reporters, provide timely access to verified emission s data, establish mechanisms to efficiently share data, and harmonize data systems to the extent possible.ICR for the GHGRP Page 11

**3 (d)**  **Effects of Less Frequent Collection** The reporting frequency for emissions data to EPA ha s been established to minimize the burden on owners and operators of affected facilities , while ensuring that the GHGRP collects facility

- specific data of sufficient quality to achieve the A gency ’s objectives
. The GHGRP require s annual reporting , except for a limited number of facilities that are already subject to more frequent reporting requirements. EPA recognizes that the highest level U
. S
. parent company and primary

NAI CS code(s) may change more frequently

than annually
. However, EPA believes that the burden of requiring facilities to update these data elements on a more frequent basis, such as every time a facility ’s highest level U
. S
. parent company , primary product(s), activity(s), or service(s) change, is greater than the benefit of obtaining that additional information. Therefore, EPA is only requiring these data elements annually , thus lessening the burden as much as possible while still gathering necessary information. EPA needs the data quickly at the beginning of e very reporting ye ar in order to electronically

verify it, publish it as authorize d by the C AA, and use it for the purposes described. If the information collection were not carried out on this schedule , the Agency would not be able to develop an informed tracking s ys tem of trends in GHG emissions across the country
. **3(e) General Guid**  **elines** This collection of information is consistent with all OMB guidelines under 5 CFR 1320.6
. However, although the GHGRP generally has a 3 year requirement for record retention, in limited cases the GHGRP require s that facilities retain records for longer than the 3 year retention period specified in the general information collection guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.6(f) of the OMB regulations implementing th e Paperwork Reduction Act
. This is because facilities or suppliers that have emissions or products with emission s less than 25,000 metric tons CO 2 e/year for five ye ars in a row or less than 1 5,000 metric tons CO 2 e/year for three years in a row may cease reporting. Those that cease reporting must h ave records to cover those consecutive ye ars of emissions and must retain such records for three years following the ye ar that reporting was discontinued
. EPA selected these two time frames and reporting thresholds because it allows these facilities or suppliers to stop reporting, but avoids the situation where a facility or supplier near this level would be constantly moving in and out of the reporting program due to small variations from one ye ar to the next. EPA believes the additional three ye ar s of recordkeeping for these respondents is needed to resolve any possible questions about past emission estimates. Thus, the additional record retention requirement of the rule adds no additional burden. **3(f) Confidentiality** Data collected under the GHGRP must be made available to the public unless the data qualify for CBI treatment under the C AA and EPA regulations
. EPA ty pically makes CBIICR for the GHGRP Page 12

determinations under the CAA on a case -by

- case basis under 40 CFR 2.301 . Due to the large numbers of entities reporting under the GHGRP and the large number of data reporting elements, EPA concluded that case

-by

- case determinations would not result in a timely release of emission data and other non - CBI data. EPA has issued guidance on what constitutes emissions data that cannot be co nsidered CBI (956 FR 7042

–7043 ; February 21, 1991). EPA protect s CBI in accordance with regulations in 40 CFR Chapter 1, P art 2, S ubpart B. All information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of CBI is made is safeguarded according to the final CBI determination published on May 26, 2011 ( 76 FR 30782 )
. The se CBI determinations conclude which data reporting elements in 40 CFR Part 98 were CBI , which were non - CBI, and which were emission data and therefore, under Section 114 of the CAA, ineligible for CBI protection
. Under the special provisions for 40 CFR Part 98 data at 40 CFR 2.301(d), EPA has grouped data elements into data categories and generall y made CBI determinations on a category basis f or 34 source categories
. These 34 source categories represent all reporting ye ar 2010 source categories and four reporting ye ar 2011 source categories ( s ubparts T, FF, II and TT). Additionally , EPA finalized CBI determinations for most of the remaining data elements to be reported under nine subparts ( s ubparts I, W, DD, II, QQ, RR, SS, TT, and UU) ( 77 FR 48072; August 13, 2012 ) and fo r new data elements in subpart L (77 FR 51477; August 24, 2012 ). EPA has deferred the reporting deadline for data elements that are used as inputs t o emissions equations to provide EPA time needed to fully evaluate and resolve issues regarding the reporting and potential release of these data (76 FR 53057 ; August 25, 2011 ). EPA has deferred the deadline for reporting some inputs to emissions equations until March 2013 and the deadline for others until March 2015 ( 77 FR 11039; February 24, 2012 )
. EPA further deferred the reporting deadline for certain recently added data elements that are inputs to emission equations in s ubparts W, FF , and TT (77 FR 48072; August 13, 2012 ) and for one data element in s ubpart L (77 FR 51477; August 24, 2012). **3(g) Sensitive Questions** This information collection does not ask any questions concerning sexual behavior or attitudes, religious beliefs, or other matters usually considered private.
**4. THE RESPONDENTS AND THE INFORMATION REQUESTED**  The respondents in this information collection include owners and operators of facilities that must report their GHG emiss ions to EPA to comply with the rulemaking. To facilitate the anal ys is, EPA has divided respondents into groups that align with the source categories identified in the rule
. This section lists the industry sectors ( i.e., GHG source categories ) that must participate in the GHGRP , the data items required of program participants, and the activities in which participants must engage to collect, assess, and in some cases submit the required data items.ICR for the GHGRP Page 13

**4(a) Respondents/ North American Industrial Classification Systems (NAICS)**  **Codes** Reporting facilities include , but are not limited to, those operating one or more units that exceed the CO 2 e threshold for the industry sectors listed below or those in the categories in which all must report, such as petroleum refining facilitie s and all other l arge emitters listed in Table A

- 3 of 40 CFR 98. 2(a)(1)
. Additionally , the GHGRP also require s reporting of certain emissions information associated with mobile sources (e.g., for permit applications or emissions control certification testing procedures). Industry secto rs are listed below by their corresponding subpart of the rule and their NAI CS code for reference.
**Part and Subpart**  **NAICS code(s)** Parts 86, 87, 89, 90, 94 , 1033, 1039, 1042, 1045, 1048, 1051, 1054 , 1064, 1065 481 Air t ransportation ; 482 Rail t ransportation ; 483 Water t ransportation

**Part 98** C. General Stationary Fuel Combustion Sources Facilities operating boilers, process heaters, incinerators, turbines, and internal combustion engines: 211 Extractors of crude petroleum and natural gas; 321 Manufacturers of lumber and wood products; 322 Pulp and paper mills; 325 Chemical manufacturers; 324 Petroleum refineries, and manufacturers of coal products; 316, 326, 339 Manufacturers of rubber and miscellaneous plastic products; 331 Steel works, blast furnaces; 332 Electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring; 336 Manufacturers of motor vehicle parts and accessories; 221 Electric, gas, and sanitary services; 622 Health services; 611 Educational services D. Electricity Generation 221112 Fossil

- fuel fired electric generating units , including units owned by federal and municipal governments and units located in Indian Country E. Adipic Acid Production 325199 Adipic acid manufacturing facilities F. Aluminum Production 331312 Primary Alumin um production facilities G. Ammonia Manufacturing 325311 Anhydrous and aqueous ammonia manufacturing facilities H. Cement Production 327310 Portland Cement manufacturing plants I. Electronics Manufacturing 334111 Microcomputers manufacturing facilities ; 334413 Semiconductor, photovoltaic cells (PV) (solid

- state) device manufacturing facilities ; 334419 Liquid crystal display (LCD) unit screens manufacturing facilities ; 334419 Microelectricomechanical devices (MEMS) manufacturing facilities K. Ferroalloy Production 331112 Ferroalloys manufacturing facilities L
. Fluorinated GHG Production 325120 Industrial gases manufacturing facilitiesICR for the GHGRP Page 14

**Part and Subpart**  **NAICS code(s)** N. Glass Production 327211 Flat glass manufacturing facilities; 327213 Glass container manufacturing facilities; 327212 Other pressed and blown glass and glassware manufacturing facilities O. HCFC
- 22 Production and HFC

- 23 Destruction 325120 Chlorodifluoromethane manufacturing facilities P. Hydrogen Production 325120 Hydrogen manufacturing facilities Q. Iron and Steel Production 331111 Integrated iron and steel mills, steel companies, sinter plants, blast furnaces, basic oxygen process furnace (BOPF) shops R. Lead Production 331419 Primary lead smelting and refining facilities; 331492 Secondary lead smelting and refini ng facilities S. Lime Manufacturing 327410 Calcium oxide, calcium hydroxide, dolomitic hydrates manufacturing facilities T. Magnesium Production 331419 Primary refiners of nonferrous metals by electrolytic methods; 331492 Secondary magnesium processing plants U. Miscellaneous Uses of Carbonate Facilities included elsewhere V. Nitric Acid Production 325311 Nitric acid manufacturing facilities W
. Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems 486210 Pipeline transportation of natural gas ; 221210 Natural gas distribution facilities; 211 Extractors of crude petroleum and natural gas; 211112 Natural gas liquid extraction facilities X. Petrochemical Production 32511 Ethylene dichloride manufacturing facilities; 325199 Acrylonitrile, ethylene oxide, m ethanol manufacturing facilities; 325110 Ethylene manufacturing facilities; 325182 Carbon black manufacturing facilities Y. Petroleum Refineries 324110 Petroleum refineries Z. Phosphoric Acid Production 325312 Phosphoric acid manufacturing facilities AA . Pulp and Paper Manufacturing 322110 Pulp mills; 322121 Paper mills; 322130 Paperboard mills BB. Silicon Carbide Production 327910 Silicon carbide abrasives manufacturing facilities CC. Soda Ash Manufacturing 325181 Alkalis and chlorine manufacturing facilities, 212391 Soda ash, natural, mining and/or beneficiation DD. Electrical Equipment Use 221121 Electric bulk power transmission and control facilities EE
. Titanium Dioxide Production 325188 Titanium dioxide manufacturing facilities FF. Underground Coal Mines 212113 Underground an thracite coal mining operations; 212112 Underground bituminous coal mining operations GG
. Zinc Production 331419 Primary zinc refining facilities; 331492 Zinc dust reclaiming facilities, recovering from scrap and/or alloying purchased metals HH
. Municipal Solid Waste Landfills 562212 Solid waste landfills; 221320 Sewage Treatment FacilitiesICR for the GHGRP Page 15

**Part and Subpart**  **NAICS code(s)** II. Industrial Wastewater Treatment 322110 Pulp mills; 322121 Paper mills ; 322122 Newsprint mills ; 322130 Paperboard mil ls ; 311611 Meat processing facilities ; 311411 Frozen fruit, juice, and vegetable manufacturing facilities ; 311421 Fruit and vegetable canning facilities ; 325193 Ethanol manufacturing facilities ; 324110 Petroleum refineries JJ. Manure Management Note: EPA will not be implementing subpart JJ of 40 CFR Part 98 using funds provided in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (Public Law 112

- 74), due to a Congressional restriction prohibiting the expenditure of funds for this purpose. LL. Suppliers of Coal

based Liquid Fuels 211111 Coal liquefaction at mine sites MM. Suppliers of Petroleum Products 324110 Petroleum refineries NN. Suppliers of Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids 221210 Natural gas distribution facilities; 211112 Natural gas liquid extr action facilities OO. Suppliers of Industrial Greenhouse Gases 325120 Industrial greenhouse gas manufacturing facilities PP. Suppliers of Carbon Dioxide 325120 Industrial greenhouse gas manufacturing facilities QQ. Importers and Exporters of Pre

- charged Equipment and Closed

Cell Foams 423730 Air
- conditioning equipment (except room units) merchant wholesalers ; 333415 Air
- conditioning equipment (except motor vehicle) manufacturing ; 336391 Motor vehicle air
conditionin g manufacturing; 423620 Air
- conditioners, room, merchant wholesalers ; 443111 Household Appliance Stores ; 423730 Automotive air
- co nditioners merchant wholesalers; 326150 Polyurethane foam products manufacturing ; 335313 Circuit breakers, power, manufacturing ; 423610 Circuit breakers merchant wholesalers RR. Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide 211 Oil and gas extraction projects using CO 2 enhanced oil and gas recovery; 211111 or 211112 Projects that inject acid gas containing CO 2 underground; N/A CO 2 geologic sequestration projects SS
. Electrical Equipment Manufacture or Refurbishment 33531 Power transmission and distribution switchgear and specialty transformers manufacturing facilities TT
. Industrial Waste Landfills 562212 Solid waste landfills ; 322110 Pulp mills ; 322121 Paper mills ; 322122 Newsprint mills ; 322130 Paperboard mills ; 311611 Meat processing facilities ; 311411 Frozen fruit, juice, and vegetable manufacturing facilities ; 311421 Fruit and vegetable canning facilities ; 221320 Sewage trea tment facilities UU. I njection of Carbon Dioxide 211 Oil and gas extraction projects using CO 2 enhanced oil and gas recovery; 211111 or 211112 Projects that inject acid gas containing CO 2 undergroundICR for the GHGRP Page 16

**Part and Subpart**  **NAICS code(s)** Mobile Sources 333618 Heavy
- duty, non

- road, aircraft, locomotive, and marine diesel engine manufacturing; 336312 Small non

- road, and marine spark

- ignition engine manufacturing facilities; 336999 Personal watercraft manufacturing facilities; 336991 Motorcycle manufacturing facilities **4(b) Information Request ed**  (i ) Data Items Re porting Requirements The GHGRP applies to certain facilities that emit GHGs and to suppliers of products that release GHGs if combusted, oxidized, or used. Applicability depends on the source categories located at the facility

and, for some source categories, the emission level or production capacity
. Fossil fuel and industrial GHG suppliers, motor vehicle and engine manufacturers, and facilities that emit 25 ,000 metric tons or more of CO 2 e/ye ar report GHG emissions data to EPA annuall y. Specificall y, the facilities in the source list of Table A

- 3 of 40 CFR 98. 2(a)(1) are the large emitters and subject to an all

- in threshold, in which they report emissions re gardless of a CO 2 e/year emissions threshold. These large emitters report all emissions from all

- in emission source categories (Table A

- 3) as well as threshold source categories (Table A

- 4 of 40 CFR 98. 2(a)( 2 ) source list) , stationary fuel combustion sources (subpart C ) , and miscellaneous use of carbonates (subpart U). Suppliers in the source list of Table A

- 5 of 40 CFR 98. 2(a)(4 ) report all applicable products in Table A

- 5
. In addition, facilities that do not contain sources listed in Table A

- 3, but that emit at least 25,000 metric tons CO 2 e/year in combined emissions from stationary combustion sources and other sources listed in Table A

- 4 report emissions from stationary fuel combustion sources (subpart C), miscellaneous use of carbonates (subpart U) , and all applicable source categories listed in Table A

- 4
. Facilities with only combustion emissions that emit at least 25,000 metric tons CO 2 e/year are onl y required to report emissions from combustion sources. Respondents comply

with the following categories of requirements (if applicable): th e G eneral Provisions applicable to all sources ; stationary combustion ; and requirements applicable to other specific source categories identified in subparts D through UU of the rule. In addition, vehicle and engine manufacturers subject to the requirements of CFR part s 86, 87, 89, 90, 94, 1033, 1039, 1042, 1045, 1048, 1051, 1054, and 1065 report CO 2 , N 2 O, and CH 4 emissions associated with the mobile sources that they produce. The f ollowing is a summary

of the information requested by source category ; requirements that apply to specific sources are found in Appendix C (reporting requirements) and Appendix D (recordkeeping requirements)
.ICR for the GHGRP Page 17

**General requirements that apply to all sources.** All respondents that exceed the reporting threshold or that belong to a source category in which all respondents report submit the following information electronicall y: 1. Facility name or supplier name (as appropriate), and physical street address of the facility or supplier, including the city, State, and zip code. 2. Year and months covered by the report; 3. Date of submittal; 4. For facilities, except as otherwise provided in 40 CFR 98.3 (c)(12) , annual emissions of CO 2 , CH 4 , N2 O, and each fluorinated GHG (as defined in 40 CFR 98. 6) as follows: a. Annual emissions (excluding biogenic CO 2 ) aggregated for all GHG from all applicable source categories and expressed in metric tons of CO 2 e calculated using Equation A

- 1 provided in subpart A ; b. Annual emissions of biogenic CO 2 aggregated for all applicable source categories, expressed in metric tons ; c. Annual emissions from each applicable s ource category , expressed in metric tons of each GHG listed as follows: i) Biogenic CO 2 ; ii) CO 2 (excluding biogenic CO 2 ); iii) CH 4 ; iv); N2 O; and v) Each fluorinated GHG (including tho se not listed in Table A

- 1 of subpart A). d. Except as provided in 40 CFR 98.2 (c)(4)(vii), emissions and other data for individual units, processes, activities, and operations as specified in the “Data reporting requirements” sec tion of each applicable subpart. e. Emissions and other data for individual units, processes, activities, and operations as specified in the “Data reporting requirements” section of each applicable subpart. f. Indicate (yes or no) whether reported emissions include emissions from a cogeneration unit located at the facility. g. When applying 40 CFR 98.2 (c)(4)(i) to fluorinated GHGs, calculate and report CO 2 e for onl y those fluorinated GHGs listed in Table A

– 1 of subpart A. h. The owner or operator of a faci lity is not required to report the data elements specified in Table A

–6 of subpart A for calendar years 2010 through 2011 until March 31, 2013. The owner or operator of a facility is not required to report the data el ements specified in Table A

–7 of subpart A for calendar ye ars 2010 through 2013 until March 31, 2015. 5. For suppliers, annual quantities of CO 2 , CH4 , N 2 O, and each fluorinated GHG (as defined in 40 CFR 98. 6) that would be emitted from combustion or use of the products supplied, imported, and exported during the year . Calculate and report quantities at the following levels: a. Total quantity

of GHG aggregated for all GHG from all applicable supply categories in Table A

– 5 of subpart A and expressed in metric tons of CO 2 e calculated using Equation A

– 1 of subpart A . For fluorinated GHGs, calculate and report CO 2 e for onl y those fluorinated GHGs listed in Table A

– 1 of subpart A ; b. Quantity

of each GHG from each applicable supply category in Table A

– 5 of subpart A , expressed in metric tons of each GHG
. Fo r fluorinated GHG,ICR for the GHGRP Page 18 report emissions of all fluorinated GHG, including those not listed in Table A

- 1 of subpart A ; and c. Any other data specified in the “Data reporting requirements” section of each applicable subpart. 6. A written explanation, as required under 40 CFR 98. 3(e), if emission calculation methodologies are changed during the reporting period. 7. A brief description of each “best available monitoring method , ” the parameter s measured using the method, and the time period during which the “best available monitoring method” was used , if applicable
. 8. Each data element for which a missing data procedure was used according to the procedures of an applicable subpart and the number o f hours in the year that a missing data procedure was used for each data element. 9. A signed and dated certification statement provided by the designated representative of the owner or operator, according to the requirements of 40 CFR 98. 4(e)(1). 10. NAI CS code( s) that apply to the facility

or supplier. a. Primary

NAICS code. Report the NAICS code that most accurately describes the facility or supplier's primary product/activity /service. The primary product/activity

/service is the principal source of revenue for the facility or supplier. A facility

or supplier that has two distinct products/activities/services providing comparable revenue may report a second primary

NAICS code. b. Additional NAI CS code(s). Report all additional NAI CS codes that describe all product(s)/a ctivity(s)/service(s) at the facility or supplier that are not related to the principal source of revenue. 11. Legal name(s) and phys ical address(es) of the highest

- level United States parent company(s) of the owners (or operators) of the facility or supplier and the percentage of ownership interest for each listed parent company as of December 31 of the year for which data are being reported according to the following instructions: a. If the facility

or supplier is entirely

owned by

a single United States company that is not owned by another company , provide that company's legal name and phys ical address as the United States parent company and report 100 percent ownership. b. If the facility

or supplier is entirely

owned by

a single United States company that is, its elf, owned b y another company (e.g. , it is a division or subsidiary

of a higher

- level company), provide the legal name and physical address of the highest

- level company in the ownership hierarchy as the United States parent company and report 100 percent o wnership. c. If the facility

or supplier is owned by

more than one United States company ( e.g. , company

A owns 40 percent, company B owns 35 percent, and company C owns 25 percent), provide the legal names and phys ical addresses of all the highest

- level companies with an ownership interest as the United States parent companies, and report the percent ownership of each company. d. If the facility

or supplier is owned by

a joint venture or a cooperative, the joint venture or cooperative is its own United States parent company
. Provide the legal name and physical address of the joint venture orICR for the GHGRP Page 19 cooperative as the United States parent company, and report 100 percent ownership b y the joint venture or cooperative. e. If the facility

or supplier is entirely

owned by

a forei gn company, provide the legal name and phys ical address of the foreign company's highest

- level company based in the United States as the United States parent company, and report 100 percent ownership. f. If the facility

or supplier is partially

owned by

a foreign company and partially owned by

one or more U.S. companies, provide the legal name and physical address of the foreign company's highest

- level company based in the United States, along with the legal names and physical addresses of the other U.S. parent companies, and report the percent ownership of each of these companies. g. If the facility

or supplier is a federally

owned facility , report “U.S. Government” and do not report phys ical address or percent ownership. Under 40 CFR 98.3(h), the owner or operator submit s a revised rep o rt within 45 days of discovering that an annual GHG report that the owner or operator previously submitted contains one or more substantive errors or being notified by EPA of errors in its GHG report. The revised report must corre ct all substantive errors. Under 40 CFR 98.4( d), the designated representative submit s the certificate of representation at least 60 days before the report deadline
. Under 40 CFR 98.4(i ), the certificate of representation include s : 1. An identification of the facility or supplier for which the certificate of representation is s ubmitted; 2. The name, organization name (company affiliation

- employer), address, e

- mail address (if any), telephone number, and facsimile transmission number (if any) of the designated representative and any alternate designated representative ; 3. A list of the owners and operators of the facility or supplier, provided that, if the list includes the operators of the facility or supplier and the owners with control of the facility or supplier, the failure to include any other owners does not make the certificate of representation incomplete; 4. The certification statements listed in 40 CFR 98.4(i)(4); and 5. The signature of the designated representative and any alternate designated representative and the dates signed. The GHGRP also includes notification procedures for changing a designated representative or alternate designated representative (40 CFR 98.4(g))
. Under 40 CFR 98.4(m)(2), in order to delegate his or her own authority to one or more individuals to submit an electronic submission of the GHG reports, the designated representative or alternate designated representative submit s electronically to the Administrator a notice of delegati on that includes the following elements:ICR for the GHGRP Page 20

1. The name, org anization name (company affiliation

- employer) address, e

- mail address (if any), telephone number, and facsimile transmission number (if any) of such designated representative or alternate designated representative. 2. The name, address, e

- mail address, teleph one number, and facsimile transmission number (if any) of each such individual (referred to as an “agent”). 3. For each such individual, a list of the ty pe or ty pes of electronic submissions under 40 CFR 98.4 (m)(1) for which authority is delegated to him or her. 4. For each type of electronic submission listed in accordance with clause (iii), the facility or supplier for which the electronic submission may be made. 5. The certification statements in 40 CFR 98.4(m)(2)(v)
. 6. The signature of such designated representative or alternate designated representative and the date signed. **Facilities that m**  **ay d**  **iscontinue r**  **eporting .**  Under 98.2(i), i f reported emissions are less than 25,000 metric tons CO 2 e/year for five consecutive years or less than 15,000 metric tons CO2e/year for three consecutive years , then the owner or operator may discontinue complying provided that the owner or operator submits a notification to the Administrator that announces the cessation of reporting and explains the reasons for the reduction in emissions
. The owner or operator maintain s the corresponding records required under 40 CFR 98.3(g) for the five (or three) consecutive ye ars and then retain such records for three years following the year that reporting was discontinued
. If the operations of a facility or supplier are changed such that all applicable GHG

- emitting processes and operations cease to operate, then the owner or operator is exempt from reporting in the years following the year in which cessation of such operations occurs, provide d that the owner or operator submits a notification to the Administrator that announces the cessation of reporting and certifies to the closure of all GHG

- emitting processes and operations. This does not apply to seasonal or other temporary cessation of op erations or facilities with municipal solid waste landfills, in dustrial waste landfills, or underground coal mines. The owner or operator resume s reporting for any future calendar year during which any of the GHG

- emitting processes or operations resume ope ration. **Other source categories.** F acilities that contain any of the source categories listed in S ection 4(a) and that exceed the threshold for any source category (or include a source category in which all facilities report) report information specific to each source category at the facility

for which methods are specified in 40 CFR Part 98, in addition to the general reporting and stationary combustion requirements outlined above. Many facilities that are affected b y the GHGRP emit GHGs from multiple sources. The sector

- specific reporting requirements are outlined in Appendix C
.ICR for the GHGRP Page 21

Recordkeeping Requirements **General requirements that apply to all sources.** The owner or operator of each facility that is subject to the GHG emissions reporting requirements keeps the following records for at least three ye ars from the date of submission of the annual GHG report for the reporting year in which the record was generat ed. Upon request by the Administrator, the records required under this section must be made available to EPA. Records may be retained off site if the records are readil y available for expeditious inspection and review. For records that are electronicall y g enerated or maintained, the equipment or software necessary to read the records shall be made available, or, if requested by EPA, electronic records shall be converted to paper documents. 1. A list of all units, operations, processes, and activities for whi ch GHG emissions were calculated
. 2. The data used to calculate the GHG emissions for each unit, operation, process, and activity , categorized by

fuel or material type, including: (i) The GHG emissions calculations and methods used; (ii) Anal ytical results fo r the development of site

spe cific emissions factors; (iii) The results of all required analyses for high heat value, carbon content, and other required fuel or feedstock parameters; and (iv) Any facility operating data or process information used for the GHG emission calculations. 3. The annual GHG reports. 4. Missing data computations
. For each missing data event, respondents must maintain records of the cause of the event and the corrective actions taken to restore malfunctioning monitoring equipment. 5. A writt en GHG Monitoring Plan, which must include, at a minimum, the following: (i) Id entification of positions of responsibility (i.e., job titles) for collection of the emissions data; (ii) Explanation of the processes and methods used to collect the necessary data for the GHG calculations; and (iii) Description of the procedures and methods that are used for quality assurance, maintenance, and repair of all continuous monitoring systems, flow meters, and other instrumentation used to provide data for th e GHGs reported. a. The owner or operator must revise the GHG Monitoring Plan as needed to reflect changes in production processes, monitoring instrumentation, and quality assurance procedures; or to improve procedures for the maintenance and repair of monitoring systems to reduce the frequency of moni toring equipment downtime. b. Upon request b y the Administrator, the owner or operator must make all information that is collected in conformance with the GHG Monitoring Plan available for review during an audit. Electronic storage of the information in the plan is permissible, provided that the information can be made available in hard copy upon request during an audit
. 6. The results of all required certification and quality assurance tests of continuous monitoring systems, fuel flow meters, and other instrumentation used to provide data for the GHGs reported
. 7. Maintenance records for all continuous monitoring s ys tems, flow meters, and other instrumentation used to provide data fo r the GHGs reported under 40 CFR 98.ICR for the GHGRP Page 22

**Other source categories.** Facilities that report and that contain any of the source categories listed in Section 4(a) also retain records for information specific to the given source category
. The sector

- specific recordkeeping requirements are outlined in Appendix D
. (ii) Respondent Activities The owner or operator of a facility that is subject to th e GHGRP ’s reporting requirements report s total annual GHG emissions in metric tons of CO 2 e , as applicable
. The primary tasks that reporting program respondents perform include : 1. Implement and update, as necessary , appropriate monitoring plan s for each affected source and each affected unit at a source , as applicable ; 2. Operation and maintenance activities associated with the monitoring, including quality assurance activities; 3. Ensuring data qual ity , preparing annual reports for submission to EPA , and submitting these reports to EPA; 4. Potentially

responding to questions or error messages from EPA; and 5. Maintaining records for a minimum of three ye ars. Respondents that use CEMS also conduct tests to certify the operations of monitors, submit the results of these tests, and record emissions data (this activity generall y is performed electronically). Reports present the annual mass GHG emissions from each source category separately
. The calculations used to determine GHG emissions, the frequency at which those calculations are required, the methods used to estimate missing data, and the QA/QC requirements depend on the specific source category
. **5. THE INFORMATION COLLECTED** 

**– AGENCY**  **ACTIVITIES, COLLECTION METHOD**  **S , AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT**  **5(a) Agency Activities**  EPA Headquarters activities include the monitoring and verification of emission reports, database and software maintenance, communication and outreach, and program evaluation. **5 (b)**  **Collection Methodology and Management** EPA has establish ed a central repository of inventory

data for all respondents , the web

based Electronic Greenhouse Gas Reporting Tool (e

- GGRT). Respondents report data electronically , and EPA store s the data in the database. Facilities and suppliers subject to the GHGRP register online through th e e - GGRT system. All data is submitted to EPA electronicall y in e

- GGRT except the one

- time Electronic Signature Agreement (ESA) which is submitted on paper. The tool has an XMLreportingICR for the GHGRP Page 23

schema that allow s facilities to upload GHG data directly in lieu of using the web fo rms provided through e

- GGRT. The XMLreporting schema contains all of the data elements needed to comply with the GHGRP . The electronic repo rts submitted under the GHGRP are subject to the provisions of 40 CFR Part 3, specifying EPA s ys tems to which electronic submissions must be made and the requirements for valid electronic signatures. Additionally , E
- GGRT can handle CBI. The new s ys tem fol low s Agency standards for design, security , data element and reporting format conformance, and accessibility . EPA designed the database in an attempt to minimize respondents’ burden b y integrating the new reporting requirements with existing data collectio n and data management systems, when feasible. All facilities or suppliers must have a Designated Representative (DR) in order to report. The DR may

appoint an Alternative Designated Representative (ADR) and agents. The D R , ADR, and agent are all able to enter data and submit the electronic report. Before submitting a report, the DR (or ADR) must certify the annual report. An electronic signature device (e.g., a PI N or password) is required to submit a report. **5(c) Sm**  **all Entity Flexibility** EPA took several steps to minimize the impacts on small entities. The Agency met several times with industry trade associations to discuss the reporting options considered and their possible impacts on small entities. EPA further minimized impacts on small entities by not requiring facilities below a certain emissions threshold to report their emissions. Where feasible, EPA also use s existing GHG emission s estimation and reporting methodologies and provide s simplified methodological options to reduce repo rting burden. According to the Agency’s anal ys is, a facility with stationary

combustion units that have a maximum rated heat input capacity of less than 30 mmBtu/hr, operating full time with any ty pe of fossil fuel , would not exceed 25,000 metric tons CO 2 e/year. Exempting facilities based on combustion unit capacity has allowed for small entities to perform a simple calculation to determine if they

are even required to estimate emissions for applicability purposes. Additionally , EPA minimize d the impact on small entities in subpart NN ( Suppliers of Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids ) b y amending the reporting threshold from an all

- in threshold to a capacity-based threshold
. EPA revised the applicability threshold so that only

local distribution companie s (LDCs) that deliver 460,000 thousand standard cubic feet (mscf) or more of natural gas per ye ar are subject to the GHGRP ( 75 FR 79092 ; December 17 , 2010 )
. The rule includes a mechanism in 40 CFR 98.2 to allow facilities and suppliers that report less than 25,000 metric tons of CO 2 e/year for 5 years or less than 15,000 metric tons CO2e/year for 3 years to cease annual reporting to EPA
.ICR for the GHGRP Page 24

**5(d) Collection Schedule** Facilities collect data and calculate emissions at varying frequencies, as described in the GHGRP , and summarized in Appendi ces C and D
. M ost facilities that meet the GHGRP ’s reporting requirements submit GHG emission reports annually
. Facilities report all U
. S
. parent company( s) information and facility primary NAICS code(s) annuall y. EPA requires that the US parent company(s) and NAICS code(s) be reported as of December 31st of the reporting year, to remain consistent with the other requirements of the GHGRP. A facility or supplier that become s subject to the GHGRP because of a physical or op erational change report emissions for the first calendar ye ar in which the change occurs beginning with the first month of the change
. A f acility or supplier that become s subject to the GHGRP solely

because of an increase in hours of operation or level of production report s emissions beginning the first month of the change if it would cause the facility or supplier to exceed the applicable threshold if maintained for the remainder of the ye ar . F acilities or suppliers that have emissio ns or products with emission less than 25,000 metric tons of CO 2 e for five ye ars in a row or less than 15,000 metric tons of CO 2 e for three ye ars in a row may

discontinue complying provided that the owner or operator submits a notification to the Administrator that announces the cessation of reporting and explains the reasons for the reduction in emissions. The notification must be submitted no later than March 31 of the year immediately

following the fifth (or third) consecutive ye ar of emissions less than 25,000 (or 15,000) tons CO 2 e/year. The owner or operator must maintain the corresponding records required under 40 CFR 98 .3(g) for each of the five (or three) consecutive years and retain such records for three ye ars following the year that reporting was discontinued. The owner or operator must resume reporting if annual emissions in any future calendar year increase to 25,000 (or 15,000 ) metric tons CO 2 e/year or more.
**6. ESTIMATING THE BURDEN AND COST OF**  **THE COLLECTION**  This section presents EPA’s estimates of the burden and costs to respondents associated with the activities described in Section 4 as well as the federal burden hours and costs associated with the activities described in Section 5(a)
. EPA estimates that, o ver the three ye ars covered b y this request, the total respondent burden associated with this reporting will average 981 thousand hours per ye ar and the cost of all respondents of the information collection will average $ 90 .8 million per year. Section 6( a) of this ICR provides estimates of burden (hours ) for all respondent ty pes. Section 6(b) contains estimates of respondent costs for the information collection. Section 6(c) summarizes federal burden and costs. Section 6(d) describes the respondent universe and the total burden and cost of this collection to respondents. Section 6(e) presents the bottom line burden and cost. Section 6(f) provides reasons for any change in burden
. The burden statement for this information collection is in Section 6( g)
.ICR for the GHGRP Page 25

**6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden** Respondent burden estimates are presented in Exhibit 6 .1
. EPA estimates that the total annual burden to all affected entities is 981,032 hours per ye ar over the three years covered by this information collection. EPA also estimated the number of responses, or actions taken as a result of the rule, per respondent (facility) per year; for facilities collecting samples on a dail y basis, this mean s a minimum of 365 responses per year. Exhibit 6.1 presents aggregate burden by sector onl y; for the details of burden calculations, please see the cost appendices
. **6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs**  Costs to respondents associated with this information collection include labor costs (i.e., the cost of labor by facility staff to meet the rule’s information collection requirements ) and non

labor costs (e.g., the cost of purchasing and installing monitoring equipment or contractor costs associated with providing the required information). To calculate labor costs , EPA estimated Bureau of L abor Statistics using an approach consistent with the IC R s associated with the GHGRP currently approved by

OMB [1

. For all subparts the labor rates are: $ 59.12 for technical workers, $77.23 for managers, $31.35 for clerical suppo rt, and $109.94 for legal support. In addition, sector- specific labor rates are used for certain subparts in the oil and gas industry : $121.72 for senior managers, $106. 89 for middle managers, $78.29 for engineers, $66.57 for technicians , and $148.92 for g eoscientists
. Non
- labor costs (capital and O&M) for individual sectors are summarized in Exhibit 6

- 1. EPA estimates that the total annual cost to all affected non - federal entities is $ 90 .8 million over the three ye ars covered b y this information collection. Exhibit 6.1 presents aggregate costs b y sector ; for the details of EPA’s cost calculations, please see Appendices E
- M
.

[1] May 2011 National Industry

- Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates (http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oessrci.htm) and Em ployer Costs for Employee Compensation for June of 2011 (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/ecec_09082011.pdf ) . See Appendix F for more information.ICR for the GHGRP Page 26 

### Exhibit **6.1 Annual Average Respondent**  **Burden and Cost F**  **or the GHG Reporting Program**  **($K)**

**Source Ca** **te go**  **ry No.**  **Re sp**  **ondents Re**  **spons es**  **/ Re**  **sp onde**  **nt To**  **ta l** 

**Re spons** **es To**  **ta l** 

**Burde n**  **(h rs)**  **To ta**  **l La**  **bor**

**Cos t**  **($ K)**  **Ca pita**  **l**

**Cos t**  **($ K)**  **O& M**  **Cos**

**t ($**  **K) To**  **ta l**  **Cos**

**t ($**  **K)**
C. Sta tiona ry Combustion (ge nera l uns pecified) 2,568 41 104,674 262,854 $15,551 $820 $2,366 $18,737 D. El ectricity Ge nera tion 1,259 9 9,815 68,171 $4,035 $0 $0 $4,035 E. Ad ipic Ac id Prod. 3 28 84 555 $33 $0 $25 $58 F. Al uminum Production 12 17 198 3,604 $232 $0 $3 $235 G. Am monia Ma nufac turing 22 107 2,355 2,150 $129 $1 $129 $259 H. Ce ment Production 98 510 50,007 28,152 $1,698 $546 $1,681 $3,925 I. El ectronics Ma nufac turing 94 7 662 35,001 $2,055 $3,512 $0 $5,567 K. Fe rroa lloy Production 10 99 987 821 $48 $0 $16 $65 L. Fl uorina ted Gre enhous e Ga s Prod 14 7 99 2,601 $142 $33 $14 $190 N. Gla ss Production 106 102 10,816 8,506 $508 $0 $107 $615 O. H CFC- 22 Production an d HFC23 De str ucti on 5 92 460 768 $42 $0 $0 $42 P. Hydroge n Production 46 23 1,057 3,428 $203 $0 $87 $290 Q. I ron an d Ste el Production 122 92 11,229 35,158 $1,848 $0 $275 $2,123 R. Lead Production 12 102 1,224 1,053 $62 $0 $19 $81 S. Lime Ma nufacturing 70 544 38,083 15,312 $909 $422 $1,109 $2,439 T. Ma gne siu m Production 11 9 99 2,061 $123 $0 $2 $124 U. Mi sc. Us es of

C ar bona te 0 0 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 V. Ni tric Ac id Production 37 42 1,557 6,728 $421 $14 $177 $613 W. Oi l an d Na tura l Ga s Sys tems 2,786 8 21,201 229,624 $18,324 $730 $1,687 $20,741 X. Petrochemica l Prod. 63 92 5,799 12,807 $737 $0 $582 $1,319 Y. P etroleum Re fi ne ri es 146 92 13,438 57,512 $3,332 $173 $224 $3,728 Z. Phos phori c Ac id Prod 10 544 5,440 2,187 $130 $60 $158 $348 AA. P ulp & Pa per Mn fc trng 116 92 10,677 11,148 $655 $1,709 $43 $2,407 BB. Si licon Ca rbi de Pr oduction 1 37 37 153 $9 $0 $0 $9 CC. Soda As h Ma nufacturing 4 93 372 932 $57 $0 $7 $64 DD. Sulfur He xa fl uoride (S F6 ) fr om El ectric Power Sys tems 141 7 993 10,635 $596 $0 $0 $596 EE. Ti tanium Dioxide P roduction 7 93 651 1,091 $65 $0 $3 $68 FF. Underg round Coa l Mi ne s 114 21 2,366 39,558 $2,339 $220 $456 $3,015 GG. Zi nc Production 6 108 648 657 $39 $1 $5 $45 HH. Landfills 1,195 92 109,989 45,311 $2,611 $66 $127 $2,804 II. Wa stewater 358 7 2,525 3,203 $188 $284 $1,017 $1,489 JJ. Ma nure Ma na ge ment (2 ) 107 91 9,801 4,643 $275 $1 $0 $276 L L. Suppl ier s of

C oa l- ba sed Liquid Fue ls, MM. S upplie rs o f P et rol
. Prod. 315 99 31,057 13,375 $936 $0 $0 $936 NN. Supplies o f N at G as an d Na t Ga s Liquids 474 53 25,240 31,095 $1,852 $0 $0 $1,852 OO. S uppliers of

I ndus tria l GHG 49 15 737 2,733 $163 $0 $0 $163 PP. Suppliers o f C O2 130 36 4,685 5,882 $346 $0 $0 $346 QQ - I mports a nd Ex ports o f Fl uorina ted GHGs i n Products 158 7 1,112 11,063 $661 $0 $0 $661 RR. Geolog ic Se ques tra tion of Ca rbon Dioxide 3 23 61 2,136 $194 $135 $327 $656 SS - S F6 Eq uipment Producers 10 7 70 441 $24 $0 $0 $24 TT -I ndus tria l Landfills 200 8 1,608 13,493 $782 $11 $88 $881 UU. Injection of

C ar bon Dioxide 92 12 1,108 3,805 $264 $0 $208 $472 Mo bi le Sources 316 1 316 626 $36 $8,514 $0 $8,550 **TOTA L**  11,039 Va ries 483,340 981,032 $62,655 $17,253 $10,940 $90,848 (1) So me r es po ndent s belo ng to m ult iple so urce ca te go ries, s o th e num ber ofres po ndent s is n ot a ddit iv e. (2) EP A will no t be im plem ent ing Subpart J J due to a C on gres sio nal res tr ic ti on pro hibit ing th e expendit ure off unds f or t his purpo se .ICR for the GHGRP Page 27

**6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost**  This section describes the burden and cost to the federal government associated with this information collection. Federal activities under this information collection include EPA Headquarters oversight of the reporting pro gram and required reporting by federal l y owned GHG generating facilities. EPA Burden and C

ost for Program Oversight EPA activities associated with the GHG reporting program include Headquarters oversight and implementation of the reporting program, e.g., monitoring and verific ation of emission reports, database and software maintenance, communication and outreach, and program evaluation
. EPA estimates that Headquarters will devote up to 25 full time equivalents (FTEs), or an estimated 52,000 hours to these activities. To develop EPA labor costs, EPA estimates the average hourl y labor rate for salary and overhead and benefits for Agency staff to be $ 52.37
. To derive this figure, EPA multiplied the hourly compensation at GS

- 12, Step 5 on the 2011 GS pay scale ($ 32.73 ) by

the standard government benefits multiplication factor of 1.6 to account for overhead and benefits. In addition to the labor cost, EPA will incur a non - labor cost of approximately $10.7 million in each of the three ye ars of the information collection for dev eloping guidance, training, responding to stakeholders, communication and outreach , database maintenance, and other contractor support. B urden and cost for federal facilities covered by the rule F ederal ly owned facilities that exceed the CO 2 e threshold must report their GHG emissions
. In2010, federally owned facilities reported in subparts C (Stationary Combustion, general unspecified) , D (E lectricity Generation), V (Nitric Acid Production), and HH (L andfills ). It is anticipated that federally owned facilities will also report under s ubparts RR and UU ( s equestration of CO 2 , under which federally owned facilities are anticipated to seek exemptions, and Injection of CO 2 ). EPA calculated the reporting burden and cost for these facilities in the sam e manner as it did for other reporting facilities. EPA estimates that the federal burden for these facilities is approximately 6 , 635 hours, for an annual total cost of $ 470, 645
. Exhibit 6. 2 presents the annual burden and cost for federal facilities that must comply with the rule.ICR for the GHGRP Page 28 

### Exhibit 6 **.2 Annual Agency Burden and Cost** 

**6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs** The number of respondents in each sector that perform the required activities under this information collection is presented in Exhibit 6. 1
. The required activities depend on whether the facility must report its GHG emissions and on the applicable sector

- specific reporting requirements. These activities are described in Section 4 (b) of this I CR
. **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Costs**  The bottom line burden hours and costs are shown in Exhibit 6.3
. **Inf orm**  **at ion C**  **olle cti**  **on Acti**  **vi ty**  **An nua**  **l Re**  **sp ons** 

**es Tot** **al Annua**  **l Burde**  **n La**  **bor C os**  **t Non-La**  **bor**

**Co st**  **Tot al**  **A nnua**  **l**

**Co st** 
Guidanc e Dev

el opm ent , Trai ni ng, Au di ts, a nd General O ve rs ight 1 52, 000 $2, 723, 240 $10, 666, 667 $13, 389, 907
C. Sta tio nary C ombus tio n (general uns pec if

ied) 2091 5, 016 $296, 727 $60, 792 $357, 518 D. Ele ctricity G enerat ion 148 1, 029 $60, 887 $0 $60, 887 V. N itric Acid Pr

oduc tio n 42 182 $11, 382 $5, 174 $16, 555 HH. L andf

ills 92 228 $13, 112 $965 $14, 077 RR. G eol ogi c Se ques trat io n of Carbon Di ox ide 1 16 $1, 097 $0 $1, 097 UU. I nj ec ti on of CO 2 4 165 $11, 486 $9, 024 $20, 510 **TOTA L**  **2 ,3**  **79 5**  **8, 635**  **$3, 117,**  **931 $10,**  **742, 621**  **$13, 860,**  **552 Bu**  **rde n**  **for Co**  **mplia nce**  **b y**  **Fe de**  **ra l Fa**  **ci lit**  **ies Ove**  **rs ig**  **ht**ICR for the GHGRP Page 29 

### Exhibit 6.3 **Bottom Line Annual Burden and Cost** 

**6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden**  This section presents the change in burden and explains the reasons for the change in burden. Exhibit 6.4 summarizes the adjustments that have affected the overall burden inventory for the final GHGRP I CR s . Nu mb er of Re sp onde nt s 11, 039 Fr om E xhi bi t 6. 1
To ta l An nua l Res pons es 483, 340 Fr om E xhi bi t 6. 1

44 = 483, 340 To ta l an nua l re sp ons es fr om a bove **÷**

11, 039 To ta l re sp onde nt s from a bove To ta l Re sp onde ntHour s 981, 032 Fr om E xhi bi t 6. 1
Ho urs pe r Re sp ons e 2. 03 = 981, 032 To ta l an nua l hour s from a bove **÷** 483, 340 To ta l re sp ons es fr om a bove An nua l O& M a nd Ca pi ta l Cos t $ 28, 192, 763 Fr om E xhi bi t 6. 1
To ta l Re sp onde ntCos t (l ab or + non) $ 90, 847, 769 Fr om E xhi bi t 6. 1

1 ,0 39, 667 = 981, 032 To ta l re sp onde nthours fr om a bove **+** 58, 635 To ta l EP A hour s from E xhi bi t 6-2 $104, 708, 321 = $90, 847, 769 To ta l re sp onde ntc os t fr om a bove **+** $13, 860, 552 To ta l EP A co st fr om Ex hi bi t 6- 2 Nu mb er of Re sp ons es pe r Re sp onde nt

To ta l Hours (Re sp onde nt s an d Age ncy)
To ta l Cos t (Re sp onde nt s an d Age ncy)ICR for the GHGRP Page 30 

### Exhibit **6.4 Summary of Changes in Annual Burden** 

**Tit le**  **Current**

**OM B Cont**  **rol Number**  **Re fe**  **ren ce** 

**EP A I**  **CR Nu**  **mb er(**  **s) No.** 

**Re sponde**  **nts To**  **ta l Bur**  **de n** 

**(hr s)**  **To ta**  **l L abor** 

**Cost ($**  **K) Ca**  **pit al C**  **ost**

**($ K)**  **O&M Cost**

**($K) To**  **ta l Cost** 

**($ K)** 

Curre ntI nve nt or y 2060- 0629 2300. 03 - 2300. 09 16, 408 1, 024, 285 $54, 994 $8, 770 $10, 314 $74, 079 Revi se d I nve nt or y 6, 742 622 ,2 22 $36, 628 $3, 813 $7, 142 $47, 582 Cha nge -9, 666 (402 ,0 62) -$ 18, 367 -$ 4, 957 -$3, 173 -$26, 496

Curre ntI nve nt or y 2060- 0647 2396. 01, 2396. 02 683 65 ,9 58 $3, 635 $515 $1, 563 $5, 713 Revi se d I nve nt or y 683 57 ,8 52 $3, 401 $515 $1, 563 $5, 479 Cha nge 0 (8 ,1 07) -$234 $0 $0 -$234

Curre ntI nve nt or y 2060- 0651 2376. 02, 2376. 03, 2376. 05 2, 786 394 ,7 57 $25, 139 $745 $1, 687 $27, 570 Revi se d I nve nt or y 2, 786 227 ,7 38 $18, 201 $730 $1, 687 $20, 618 Cha nge 0 (167 ,0 19) -$6, 938 -$15 $0 -$6, 953

Curre ntI nve nt or y 2060- 0650 2373. 02 - 2373. 04 417 76 ,7 01 $4, 152 $2, 705 $10 $6, 866 Revi se d I nve nt or y 417 59 ,4 58 $3, 461 $3, 545 $14 $7, 020 Cha nge 0 (17 ,2 43) -$691 $841 $5 $154 **Re ason**  **for Cha nge**  **in Burden (se e Appendix I**  **-3 for more**  **de ta**  **ils):** • Ad ju st ed thel ab or hours a nd l ab or cos t pe r fa ci lity t o re cog ni ze the com pl eti on of theone -ti me act iv it ie s th atoc curre d i n t hefi rs t ye ar of da ta c ol le ct io n (2011). • Corre ct ed a n e rro r i n t he2010 I CR, i n whi ch t heburde n hours for two a ct iv it ie s wer e su mmed i ncorre ct ly(s ee Ap pe ndi x I ). **Addit iona**  **l Sourc es** **of Fluor inat**  **ed GHG (Subpar**  **ts I**  **, L,** **DD, QQ, and SS)***

**Re ason**  **for Cha nge**  **in Burden (se e Appendix J**  **-3 for more**  **de ta**  **ils):** • Ad ju st ed thel ab or hours , l ab or cos t, O &M c os ts , a nd ca pi ta l cos t pe r fa cility to r ec ogni ze the c ompl eti on of t heone -ti me ac ti vi ti es tha t oc curre d i n t hefi rs t ye ar of da ta c ol le ct io n (2 011). • Note: EP A is cons id er in g fut ur e am en dme nt s to Subpa rtI . The sec ha ng es woul d bedocum en ted i n a futur e IC R, whi ch w oul d a men d thi s re newa l IC R. **“T ra**  **ck 1” S**  **ubpa rts** **, No**  **t In**  **cluding Mobile S**  **ource s (Subpar**  **ts C,** **D, E, F, G, H, N ,**  **O, P,** **Q, R, S, U, V**  **, X, Y, Z, AA, BB, CC, EE, GG, HH, JJ, L**  **L, M**  **M, N N,**  **OO, a**  **nd PP)**

**Magne sium**  **Produc ti**  **on, U**  **nderground Coal M ine**  **s, In dust**  **ri al W**  **ast ewa**  **ter Tr**  **ea tmen**  **t, a**  **nd I ndust**  **ri al W**  **ast e**  **La ndfills (Subpa**  **rts T**  **, FF,** **I I,**  **an d T** 

**T)***

**Pe tro**  **le um and N**  **at ur**  **al Gas Syst ems** **(Subpa rt W)** * **Re ason**  **for Cha nge**  **in Burden (See Appendix G-3 for mor**  **e de ta**  **ils)** • Re mo ve d one -ti me burde n for c ove rag e deter mi na ti on, w hi ch a ffe ct ed 19, 848 re sp onde nt s, w ho i ncurre d 258, 019 hours i n burde n (ove r th re e ye ars, t hi s av er ag ed 6, 610 re sp onde nt s an d 8 6, 006 hours ). • Ad ju st ed thenum be r of r es ponde nt s ba se d on t henumbe r of fa cilit ie s th atre port ed t o e GGRT. • Ad ju st ed thel ab or hours , l ab or cos t, O &M c os ts , a nd ca pi ta l cos t pe r fa cility to r ec ogni ze the c ompl eti on of t heone -ti me ac ti vi ti es tha t oc curre d i n t hefi rs t ye ar of da ta c ol le ct io n (2 010). • Ad ju st ed l ab or hour s an d dol lar s to c or re cta n e rro r i n t heI CR a sso ciat ed w it h t heDe ce mb er 17, 2 010, a men dm en ts to the GHGRP (I CR N o. 2300. 06)
.

**Re ason**  **for Cha nge**  **in Burden (se e Appendix H-3 for**  **mor e det**  **ails)** • Ad ju st ed thel ab or hours a nd l ab or cos t pe r fa ci lity t o re cog ni ze the com pl eti on of theone -ti me act iv it ie s th atoc curre d i n t hefi rs t ye ar of da ta c ol le ct io n (2011).ICR for the GHGRP Page 31 

### Exhibit **6.4 Summary of Changes in Annual Burden**  **(continued)**

**Title Current** 

**OMB Control Number**  **Reference**

**EPA ICR Number(s)**  **No.**

**Respondents Total Burden** 

**(hrs) Total Labor** 

**Cost ($K)**  **Capital Cost**

**($K) O&M Cost** 

**($K) Total Cost** 

**($K)**

Current Inventory 2060
- 0649 2372.02, 2372.03 89 4,794 $357 $88 $439 $884 Revised Inventory 95 5,877 $454 $135 $534 $1,124 Change 6 1,083 $97 $47 $95 $240

Current Inventory 2060
- 0646 2374.02 10,551 9,487 $571 $0 $0 $571 Revised Inventory 10,723 7,259 $475 $0 $0 $475 Change 172 (2,228)

- $97 $0 $0

- $97

Current Inventory, Not Including Below 2060
- 0629 2300.03 317 140,680 $8,605 $0 $0 $8,605 Current Inventory, Aircraft Engines 2060
- 0680 2427.02 10 60 $3,646 $0 $0 $3,646 Revised Inventory 316 626 $36 $8,514 $0 $8,550 Change

- 11 (140,114)

- $12,216 $8,514 $0

- $3,702

Current Inventory 20,710 1,716,722 $100,529 $12,823 $14,013 $127,364 Revised Inventory 11,039 981,032 $62,655 $17,253 $10,940 $90,848 Change

- 9,671 (735,690)

- $37,874 $4,430

- $3,073

- $36,517 * Does not include the provision of information on parent companies, NAICS codes, and whether emissions are from cogeneration. applies to all respondents, the number of respondents is not additive. ** Because respondents to the request for data on parent companies, NAICS codes, and whether emissions are from cogeneratio n **Injection and Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide (Subparts RR and UU)***

**Reason for Change in Burden (see Appendix K -**  **3 for more details):** • Shifted the activities associated with Subpart RR two years into the future to reflect the fact that Class VI UIC permits w ere not issued as quickly as anticipated in the ICR. For example, the activities estimated for Year 1 of the current ICR (2011 ) have been shifted to Year 1 of the renewal ICR (2013, the first year in which Class VI injection is expected to begin). • Adjusted the labor hours, labor cost, O& M costs, and capital cost per facility for Subpart UU to recognize the completion of the one

- time activities that occurred in the first year of data collection (2011). • Adjusted the number of respondents for Subpart UU to reflect the slightly highe r number of facilities anticipated in the out

- years of the previous ICR. **Provision of Information on Parent Companies, NAICS Codes, and Whether Emissions are from Cogeneration, Not Including Mobile Sources** 

**Reason for Change in Burden (see Appendix L** **- 2 for more details):**  • Adjusted the number of respondents to reflect available information on the actual number of facilities that reported to eGG RT (in the case of the “Track 1” sectors) and to reflect the number of respondents estimate d for the “Track 2” sectors. • Adjusted the labor hours and labor cost facility to recognize the completion of the one

- time activities that occurred in the first year of data collection (2010 and 2011).

**All Subparts, All Activities  ** Mobile Sources**

**Reason for Change in Burden (see Appendix M -**  **3 for more details):** • Removed heavy

- duty engine manufacturers, in which are accounted for in other ICRs (OMB No. 2060

- 0104, ICR No. 0783.58 and OMB No. 2060
- 0678, ICR No. 2394.02) • Corrected an error in the 2010 ICR, which capital costs were expressed as burden.ICR for the GHGRP Page 32

**6( g** **) Burden Statement** The respondent reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 981,032 hours per ye ar for a three

- ye ar period. The average annual burden to EPA for this period is estimated to be 52,000 hours for oversight activities and 6, 635 hours for f ederal facilities that must comply

with the rule. The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 2 hours per re sponse. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a federal agency . This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing way s to comply with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to resp ond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations are listed in 40 CFR Part 9
. To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this I CR under Docket ID Number EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2012
- 0333 , which is available for online viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Air and Radiation docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West Building , Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday

through Friday , excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiatio n docket is (202) 566
- 1742. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov. This site can be used to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically . When in the system, select “search,” then key in the Docket ID Number identified above. Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2012
- 0333 and OMB Control Number 2060
- 0629 on any correspondence
.