alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
APN NO. 162-18-801-003,

20010802

01493

 

01125503-029-TDS

 

**ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES ANDRENTS**

 

**SUNWOOD VILLAGE JOINT VENTURE, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**

 

**AS ASSIGNOR**

 

**AND**

 

**FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK,**

 

**AS ASSIGNEE**

 

**County: Clark**

 

**State: Nevada**

 

 

 

 

 

 

Record and Return to:

Winston & Strawn

200 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10166

Attention:  Colette Bonnard

 

FUNB Loan No.: 502694601

Sunwood Apartments

 

 

**MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO:**

**SUNWOOD VILLAGE JOINT VENTURE**

**C/O SPECS, INC.**

**4200 BLUE RIDGE KLVD STE LH-06**

**KANSAS CITY, MO 64133**

 

----
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Annotated BibliographiesChildrens LiteratureDeathDisabilitiesDivorceElementary EducationEmotional ProblemsNatural DisastersProblem SolvingReading Material SelectionSocial ProblemsViolence

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 5:02cr38-RH/AK

MARVIN FLEMING,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING §2255 MOTION

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 110) and the objections thereto (document 115). I

have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. I conclude that the

report and recommendation is correct and should be adopted as the opinion of the

court with this additional note.

Defendant’s court-appointed attorney advised me at a pretrial conference

that defendant had complained about his representation. I inquired of defendant on

the record and determined that there were no good grounds for complaint. 

Defendant seemingly acquiesced in that conclusion. Defendant knowingly,

voluntarily, and intelligently waived a jury trial. Defendant’s attorney provide

Case 5:02-cr-00038-RH-AK Document 116 Filed 04/26/08 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No: 5:02cr38-RH/AK

effective representation at the bench trial, but the government proved defendant

guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and I so ruled. 

Defendant’s contention now is that his attorney had a “conflict.” The only

alleged “conflict,” however, was defendant’s complaint that the attorney was not

rendering satisfactory representation. If a defendant’s own dissatisfaction with his

court-appointed attorney, even though baseless, was always sufficient without

more to require appointment of a new attorney, then management of a criminal

docket would be difficult indeed. When a defendant really cannot get along with

his court-appointed attorney, my practice is to appoint a new attorney, even if it is

the defendant’s fault. In the case at bar, however, I was satisfied that the defendant

and his attorney could work together, as in fact they did. Defendant was not

entitled to appointment of a different attorney. This attorney rendered effective

assistance.

For these reasons and those set forth in the report and recommendation, 

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED. The clerk shall enter

judgment stating, “Defendant’s motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. §2255 (document

93) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE.” The clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED this 26th day of April, 2008.

Case 5:02-cr-00038-RH-AK Document 116 Filed 04/26/08 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No: 5:02cr38-RH/AK

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 5:02-cr-00038-RH-AK Document 116 Filed 04/26/08 Page 3 of 3
22.000 Scope of part.       This part-                                       (a) 						            Deals with general policies regarding contractor labor relations as they pertain to the acquisition process;                                          (b) 						            Prescribes contracting policy and procedures for implementing pertinent labor laws; and                                          (c) 						            Prescribes contract clauses with respect to each pertinent labor law.    **Parent topic:** Part 22 - Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions
EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-9756, 33-19289, 33-28059, 33-43156 and 33-65363) pertaining to
the 1986 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1987 Stock Plan, the 1987 Stock Plan,
as amended,  the 1986 Employee Stock  Purchase Plan as amended,  and the Amended
and Restated 1986 Employee  Stock  Purchase Plan and 1995 Director  Stock Option
Plan, respectively,  of Fluor Daniel GTI, Inc., formerly Groundwater Technology,
Inc.,  of our report  dated  December 10,  1996,  with respect to the  financial
statements of Fluor Daniel Environmental  Services,  Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) of Fluor Daniel GTI,  Inc.  for the  Transition  Period ended
October 31, 1996.

                                                    /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Orange County, California
January 24, 1997
28.313 Contract clauses for insurance of

transportation or transportation-related

services.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.228-9, Cargo Insurance, in solicitations and

contracts for transportation or for transportation-related services, except when freight is shipped

under rates subject to released or declared value.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as that at 52.228-10,

Vehicular and General Public Liability Insurance, in solicitations and contracts for transportation or

for transportation-related services when the contracting officer determines that vehicular liability or

general public liability insurance required by law is not sufficient.

Parent topic: Subpart 28.3 - Insurance
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey A. Leddy, Chief Executive Officer and President of SkyTerra Communications, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 10, 2006

By:

/s/    JEFFREY A. LEDDYName:

Jeffrey A. LeddyTitle:

Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Furia Organization, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Martin Cohen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Martin Cohen
------------------------
Martin Cohen
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M ADMINISTRATIVE

DOCKET

This Document Relates To: 

Admin Docket No. 

Case No. 3:19-mc-87

JUDGE M. CASEY RODGERS

MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R. JONES

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL FROM ADMINISTRATIVE DOCKET

I. PLAINTIFF INFORMATION

MDL Centrality Plaintiff ID:

Name:

First M.I. Last

1. Are there any unresolved representation issues pending before the Court in the

plaintiff’s administrative case?

Yes/No

2. Are there any disputes involving initial census submissions pending before the Court

in the plaintiff’s administrative case?

Yes/No

II. EFFECT OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

A. If there are no unresolved representation issues or disputes involving initial census submissions

pending before the Court in the plaintiff’s administrative case at the time this Request for Dismissal is

docketed, then the Request for Dismissal will be construed as a notice of voluntary dismissal and the

plaintiff’s administrative case will be automatically dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P.

41(a)(1)(A)(i), without a court order.

B. If there is an unresolved representation issue, the attorney of record must follow the process for

withdrawal of counsel set forth in Pretrial Order No. 22, ECF No. 898 at 8.

C. If there is a dispute about the sufficiency of the administrative plaintiff’s initial census submissions and

that dispute is not resolved through the deficiency processes already in place, the parties must proceed

with motions practice in accordance with Pretrial Order No. 22, ECF No. 898 at 7. If the Court finds

the administrative plaintiff’s initial census submissions sufficient, that plaintiff’s case must be either

transitioned to the 3M MDL docket, 3:19md2885, or voluntarily dismissed, within 60 days thereafter.

To the extent the Court finds the administrative plaintiff’s submissions deficient, that plaintiff will be

granted a short time period within which to cure the deficiency. Absent a showing of good cause,

3M Products Liability Litigation

8:20-cv-89222-MCR-GRJ

Javier Abreu

No No

242379

Case 8:20-cv-89222-MCR-GRJ Document 2 Filed 12/08/21 Page 1 of 2
2 

failure to provide nondeficient initial census materials within the applicable deadlines will be grounds 

for dismissal with prejudice. 

Dated: __________________ Respectfully submitted, 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

/s/ Nicole Berg

Nicole Berg (IL Bar # 6305464)*

KELLER LENKNER LLC

150 N. Riverside Plaza, Suite 4270

Chicago, Illinois 60606

ncb@kellerlenkner.com *Admitted Pro Hac Vice

December 8, 2021

Case 8:20-cv-89222-MCR-GRJ Document 2 Filed 12/08/21 Page 2 of 2
24.302 Contract clause.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at FAR 52.224-3, Privacy Training, in solicitations

and contracts when, on behalf of the agency, contractor employees will-

(1) Have access to a system of records;

(2) Create, collect, use, process, store, maintain, disseminate, disclose, dispose, or otherwise handle

personally identifiable information; or

(3) Design, develop, maintain, or operate a system of records.

(b) When an agency specifies that only its agency-provided training is acceptable, use the clause

with its Alternate I.

Parent topic: Subpart 24.3 - Privacy Training
#### § 51.2090 Serious damage.

*Serious damage* means any defect which makes a kernel or piece of kernel unsuitable for human consumption, and includes decay, rancidity, insect injury and damage by mold. The following defect shall be considered as serious damage: Shriveling when the kernel is seriously withered, shrunken, leathery, tough or only partially developed: Provided, that partially developed kernels are not considered seriously damaged if more than one-fourth of the pellicle is filled with meat.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1165

SHAWN OTIS BUMPASS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JESSE HOWARD; JAMES WETZEL; DAVID FREY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00305-JPB-JPM)

Submitted: September 30, 2020 Decided: October 2, 2020

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn Otis Bumpass, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas E. Buck, BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, 

Wheeling, West Virginia; Donald J. Tennant, Jr., TENNANT LAW OFFICES, Wheeling, 

West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Otis Bumpass appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims under 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Bumpass v. Howard, No. 5:19-cv-00305-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 15, 2020). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
 
EXH 99.2



Contact:  Richard E. Gathright - President and Chief Operating Officer
          or Harold R. Logan, Jr. - Executive Vice President/Finance
          303-626-8200


THURSDAY, 12 NOVEMBER 1998           RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EASTERN TIME
--------------------------           ---------------------------------


TRANSMONTAIGNE COMPLETES NEW CREDIT FACILITY

Denver - TransMontaigne Inc. ("TransMontaigne") (ASE:TMG), Denver, Colorado, has
closed a new $500 million Senior Credit Facility which was underwritten by
BankBoston N.A.  The Facility will be used to refinance existing bank debt, fund
the recently closed acquisition of Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp. and future
acquisitions, and for general corporate purposes.

TransMontaigne, operating through wholly-owned subsidiaries, provides a broad
range of seamless mid/downstream integrated logistical services to the petroleum
and chemical industry from locations of production and manufacture to
utilization.

                                    - END -
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 1:20cv141-RH-GRJ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JULIE ANN SMITH,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:20cv141-RH-GRJ

HUNTER WARFIELD, INC.,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER CLOSING THE FILE

The parties have filed a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice. ECF No. 19. 

The notice is effective without an order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Anago 

Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012). This order 

confirms that the case has been dismissed. The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on June 18, 2021.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00141-RH-GRJ Document 20 Filed 06/18/21 Page 1 of 1
#### Frank Kornowski, Respondent, v County of Erie, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Less than three weeks after expiration of the statutory period during which service of a notice of claim could be made (see General Municipal Law, § 50-e, subd 1), plaintiff moved pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law to extend the time to serve such notice. Since defendants filed no papers in opposition to the motion, we accept as true all of the allegations in the moving papers *(Schweickert v State of New York,*64 AD2d 1026). It is amply demonstrated that defendants have suffered no prejudice as a result of plaintiff’s delay in serving the notice of claim and thus Special Term properly exercised its discretion in granting plaintiff’s application (see *Matter of Ziecker v Town of Orchard Park,*70 AD2d 422; *Matter of Wemett v County of Onondaga,*64 AD2d 1025; *Matter of Matey v Bethlehem Cent. School Dist,*63 AD2d 807). (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—late notice of claim.) Present—-Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
#### §§ 4285.83-4285.92 [Reserved]
SCPW-20-0000427

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

NA # AU PONO LIKO O KALANI MARTIN, Petitioner,

vs. DAVID IGE, Governor of the State of Hawai # i and future occupants of the Executive Branch of the State of Hawai # i, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner’s “Petition for a Writ of Prohibition & Justice”, filed on June 19, 2020, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that petitioner is entitled to the requested extraordinary relief from this court or that petitioner lacks alternative means to seek relief. See Honolulu Adv., Inc. v. Takao, 59 Haw. 237, 241, 580 P.2d 58, 62 (1978) (a writ of prohibition “is an extraordinary remedy . . . to restrain a judge of an inferior court from acting beyond or in excess of his jurisdiction”); Gannett Pac. Corp. v. Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-20-0000427 24-JUN-2020 08:28 AMRichardson, 59 Haw. 224, 226, 580 P.2d 49, 53 (1978) (a writ of

prohibition is not meant to serve as a legal remedy in lieu of normal appellate procedures; rather, it is available in “rare and exigent circumstances” where “allow[ing] the matter to wend its way through the appellate process would not be in the public interest and would work upon the public irreparable harm”). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 24, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
# 22.303 Administration and enforcement.

The procedures and reports required for *construction* contracts in subpart  22.4 also apply to investigations of alleged violations of the statute on other than *construction* contracts.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 22.3 - Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act
#### § 457.120 [Reserved]
# L_2013309EN.01000901.xml

| 19.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 309/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 309/9

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1161/2013

of 7 November 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Pecorino di Picinisco (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Pecorino di Picinisco’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Pecorino di Picinisco’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pecorino di Picinisco’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pecorino di Picinisco’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 November 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 57, 27.2.2013, p. 28.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

ITALY

Pecorino di Picinisco (PDO)

---
#### Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Respondent, v Algemene Bank Nederland N. V., Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 20,1980, which dismissed the complaint on the ground of *forum non conveniens*on the condition that the defendant waive the Statute of Limitations as a defense, modified, on the law and the facts, to limit the provision with respect to the waiver of the Statute of Limitations only to that period which may have accrued since the date when the action was commenced, with costs and disbursements. The order entered at Special Term provided for an absolute waiver of the Statute of Limitations. Inasmuch as defendant-appellant’s contention as to *forum non conveniens*was upheld, it is not proper to condition it on a total waiver of the statute. Plaintiff should not be in a better position in another jurisdiction than it would be in this jurisdiction with respect to the Statute of Limitations. We therefore limit the waiver requirement to any such defense which may have accrued since the date when this action was *791commenced. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Ross, Silverman and Carro, JJ.