alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amalgamated Pictures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2010

| /s/ Avery Pack                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| Avery Pack, President and          Chief Executive Officer          (Principal Executive Officer) and          Acting Chief Financial Officer          (Principal Financial Officer and          Principal Accounting Officer) |
Exhibit 10.1


 


Amendment 2 to


The New York Times
Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan,


as amended and
restated effective January 1, 2009


 


The
New York Times Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and
restated effective January 1, 2009, is hereby amended, effective January 1,
2009 as follows:


 


1.                                       Section 3.3
is hereby amended by changing the reference to “Normal Retirement Date” to “Postponed
Retirement Date”.  Section 3.3., as
amended, shall read as follows:


 


“3.3                           The annual Retirement benefit payable to
a Participant who Retires on a Postponed Retirement Date shall be equal to the
benefit determined in accordance with Section 3.1 based on the Participant’s
Service and Final Average Earnings as of the Participant’s Postponed Retirement
Date.”
§ 3560.702 Unauthorized assistance sources and situations. ( a ) Unauthorized assistance can be received by a borrower or tenant in the form of loans, grants, interest credit, rental assistance, or other assistance provided by the Agency including assistance received as a result of an incorrect interest rate being applied to an Agency loan. Agency officials may pursue identification and recapture of unauthorized assistance through any legal remedies available.
( b ) Unauthorized assistance may result from situations such as: ( 1 ) Assistance being provided to an ineligible borrower or tenant;
( 2 ) Assistance to an eligible borrower or tenant being used for an unauthorized purpose;
( 3 ) Assistance being obtained as a result of inaccurate, incomplete, or fraudulent information provided by a borrower or tenant; or
( 4 ) Assistance being obtained as a result of errors by the Agency, borrower, or tenant.
Exhibit 32



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



In connection with the Report of Material Sciences Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Clifford D. Nastas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



January 9, 2006By:

/s/ Clifford D. NastasClifford D. NastasChief Executive Officer and Director




In connection with the Report,
I, Jeffrey J. Siemers, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative and Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



January 9, 2006By:

/s/ Jeffrey J. SiemersJeffrey J. SiemersExecutive Vice President, ChiefAdministrative and Financial Officer and Secretary




36
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN LEE SMITH,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a municipal

corporation; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-55393

D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02254-LABBLM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 2, 2011** 

Before: RYMER, IKUTA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Steven Lee Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that city officials violated his First

Amendment right to petition the government by refusing to accept further inFILED

AUG 10 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-55393

person complaints concerning purported zoning and municipal code violations

after Smith had lodged numerous complaints on the same matter. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Corrie v. Caterpillar, Inc.,

503 F.3d 974, 979 (9th Cir. 2007), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Smith’s action because it is devoid of

merit given that Smith had sufficient opportunities to submit complaints to

defendants, and the action appears to be an attempt to obtain federal jurisdiction to

review prior state and local proceedings concerning Smith’s complaints. See Steel

Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 89 (1998) (a claim may be

dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction if it appears to be made for the

purpose of obtaining jurisdiction or is wholly devoid of merit); Jones v. N.C.

Prisoners’ Labor Union, Inc., 433 U.S. 119, 131 n.6 (1977) (the restriction of

some avenues for petitioning the government does not violate the First

Amendment). 

Smith’s motion to expedite this appeal is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fox
Petroleum Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended August 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Jonathan Wood, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

October 20, 2008

*/s/ Jonathan
Wood*Jonathan WoodChief Financial Officer and Director
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                               236,293,594
<SECURITIES>                              71,614
<RECEIVABLES>                         20,545,050
<ALLOWANCES>                         (1,100,593)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     266,365,777
<PP&E>                                20,892,386
<DEPRECIATION>                       (5,271,445)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       403,822,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 19,607,354
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 39,025,084
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                 494,282
<OTHER-SE>                           344,474,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         403,822,400
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      23,816,483
<CGS>                                 13,061,222
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         13,061,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      31,778,472
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (21,193,088)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (21,193,088)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                        (21,193,088)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.74)




</TABLE>
Subpart 23.11 - Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving    **Parent topic:** Part 23 - Environment, Energy and Water Efficiency, Renewable Energy Technologies, Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free Workplace23.1101 Purpose.       This subpart implements the requirements of the Executive Order (E.O.) 13513, dated October 1, 2009 (74 FR 51225, October 6, 2009), Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging while Driving.23.1102 Applicability.       This subpart applies to all solicitations and contracts.23.1103 Definitions.       As used in this subpart-          *Driving*-1. Means operating a motor vehicle on an active roadway with the motor running, including while temporarily stationary because of traffic, a traffic light, stop sign, or otherwise.                                                                     2. Does not include operating a motor vehicle with or without the motor running when one has pulled over to the side of, or off, an active roadway and has halted in a location where one can safely remain stationary.                                                                                          *Text messaging* means reading from or entering data into any handheld or other electronic device, including for the purpose of short message service texting, e-mailing, instant messaging, obtaining navigational information, or engaging in any other form of electronic data retrieval or electronic data communication. The term does not include glancing at or listening to a navigational device that is secured in a commercially designed holder affixed to the vehicle, provided that the destination and route are programmed into the device either before driving or while stopped in a location off the roadway where it is safe and legal to park.23.1104 Policy.       Agencies shall encourage contractors and subcontractors to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving-                                       (a) 						            Company-owned or rented vehicles or Government-owned vehicles; or                                          (b) 						            Privately-owned vehicles when on official Government business or when performing any work for or on behalf of the Government.23.1105 Contract clause.       The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.223-18, Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving, in all solicitations and contracts.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 21, 2017

NO. 03

- 16

- 00322

- CV

Rebeca D. Balderas

- Ramirez, Appellant

v.

Anthony Carl Felder, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUS TICES PURYEAR, PEMBE RTON, AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED

— OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on February 19, 2016

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. The

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
STATE OF DELAWARE 

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 

& ENViRONMENTAL CONTROL 

DIVISION OF AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT 

AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT 156 S. STATE STREET TELEPHONE: (302) 739 - 9402 

SECTION DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 FAX No.: (302) 739 ­ 3106 

CERTIFICATION
 

September 15, 2009
 

I hereby certify that a public hearing was held August 27,2009, on the Amendment to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision for Ozone, Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.sJ, NAAQS, and 

Visibility (as submitted on December, 2007). The purpose of this amended SIP is to respond to the 

EPA's requests for Delaware to clarify and provide supplemental language to Delaware's State 

Implementation Plan Revision for Ozone, Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.sJ, and Visibility, which 

was originally submitted on December 17,2007. The effective date of this amended Revision is 

September 1, 2009. 

I further certify that the hearing was held in accordance with the notice required by Subsection 

51.102 of 40 CFR 51. 

PRINTED ON
 

RECYCLED PAPER
Editorial Note on Part 3407
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3407 appear at 76 FR 4810, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3407.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Authorized Departmental Officer* means the NIFA official, acting within the scope of delegated authority, who is responsible for awarding and administering project grants on behalf of USDA and for carrying out NEPA responsibilities as outlined in § 3407.4(d) of this part. The Authorized Departmental Officer's responsibilities do not include the review, approval, management, or similar activity relating to programs or projects funded by NIFA on the basis of statutory formula and also do not include parallel responsibilities relating to the management or administration of cooperative agreements awarded by NIFA.
( b ) Other terms used in this regulation have the same meaning as they have in the CEQ regulations.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:02-cr-00043 MMP

FREDDIE LEE MURPHY,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 402, Motion for Clarification, filed by

Defendant Freddie Lee Murphy. The Government was directed to respond to Defendant’s

motion, and has done so. Doc. 404. In its Response, the Government states it has determined

that there is an insufficient factual basis to support the filing of a Rule 35 motion on Defendant

Murphy’s behalf. Because this decision rests within the discretion of the Government, and

because Defendant has not alleged or demonstrated any unconstitutional motive, Defendant’s

motion is denied. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of September, 2007

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:02-cr-00043-MP-GRJ Document 405 Filed 09/20/07 Page 1 of 1
# 22.610 Contract clause.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert	the clause at 52.222-20,	Contracts for Materials, *Supplies*, Articles, and Equipment, in *solicitations*	and contracts covered by the statute (see 22.603, 22.604, and 22.605).

**Parent topic:**Subpart 22.6 - Contracts for Materials, Supplies, Articles, and Equipment
27.404 Basic rights in data clause.

This section describes the operation of the clause at 52.227-14, Rights in Data-General, and also the

use of the provision at 52.227-15, Representation of Limited Rights Data and Restricted Computer

Software.

27.404-1 Unlimited rights data.

27.404-2 Limited rights data and restricted computer software.

27.404-3 Copyrighted works.

27.404-4 Contractor’s release, publication, and use of data.

27.404-5 Unauthorized, omitted, or incorrect markings.

27.404-6 Inspection of data at the contractor’s facility.

Parent topic: Subpart 27.4 - Rights in Data and Copyrights
3.909-1 Prohibition.

(a) The Government is prohibited from using fiscal year 2015 and subsequent fiscal year funds for a

contract with an entity that requires employees or subcontractors of such entity seeking to report

waste, fraud, or abuse to sign internal confidentiality agreements or statements prohibiting or

otherwise restricting such employees or subcontractors from lawfully reporting such waste, fraud, or

abuse to a designated investigative or law enforcement representative of a Federal department or

agency authorized to receive such information. See section 743 of Division E, Title VII, of the

Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235) and its successor

provisions in subsequent appropriations acts (and as extended in continuing resolutions.)

(b) The prohibition in paragraph (a) of this section does not contravene requirements applicable to

Standard Form 312 (Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement), Form 4414 (Sensitive

Compartmented Information Nondisclosure Agreement), or any other form issued by a Federal

department or agency governing the nondisclosure of classified information.

Parent topic: 3.909 Prohibition on providing funds to an entity that requires certain internal

confidentiality agreements or statements.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LADIES MEMORIAL 

ASSOCIATION INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No.: 3:20cv5681/MCR/ZCB

CITY OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on January 20, 

2023. (Doc. 68). The Court furnished the parties a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There have been no timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, I have 

determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 68) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-05681-MCR-ZCB Document 69 Filed 03/17/23 Page 1 of 2
2

2. The Plaintiffs’ Application for Attorneys’ Fees, (Doc. 60), is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of March 2023.

M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05681-MCR-ZCB Document 69 Filed 03/17/23 Page 2 of 2
**Hartsfield -** **Jackson At**  **lanta International Airport**

City of A tlanta  Department of A viation 

## Providing equal access **to passengers and**  **visitors with disabilities or other special needs.**  **U. S. Access**  **Board Meeting**  **May 8, 2012** 

## Providing equal access **to passengers and**  **visitors with disabilities or other special needs.**  **U. S. Access**  **Board Meeting**  **May 8, 2012** 92 million passenger s in 2011  920,000 total flights per y ear  250,000 a ve ra ge daily passenger s  Nons top flights to 156 U .S. cities  Nons top flights to mor e than 80 cities in 50 c oun tries  5.6 million - squar e - fo ot terminal comple x  4,700 - acr e c ampus with cargo , main te nance and support

with car and support fa cilities“T he Pr esident is committed to nurturing a society that v alues the contribution of all our citiz ens and r esidents, including appr ox imately 50 million people in this country living with disabilities.” “T he Pr esident believ es tha t disability rights ar en’t jus t civil rights to be enfor ced her e a t home, but they ar e univ ersal rights to be recogniz ed and

t home, but they ar rights to be recogniz pr omoted ar ound the w orld. T oda y 650 million people — 10% of the wo rld’ s population – liv e with a disability.”



## www **.w hitehouse.gov** The en tire Hartsfield -Jack son Community is co mmitte d to pr oviding ser vices and resour ces t o assist passeng er s and visit or s with disabilities or other special needs. AT L works closely with the c ommunity to co ntinually identify wa ys to pr ovide greater access t o the airport. It is our goal t o make everyone’ s tr ave l thr ough Hartsfield -Jack son an enjoy able e xperience.

### • Our facilities ar e fully accessible including our new In te rnational Te rminal. • Pa rking -- ex tra wide parking

a wide parking spaces; AD A parking locations close to the terminal en tr ances. • Tr ave lers Aid — info. & services. • Wheelchair Service with cus to mer service r epr esen tat ives.

### • Defibrillator s • Te lephones - TTY lephones (T elephone/t eletypewrit er) 

### • New Elev ators • Re sta ur an ts and shops -- all seating & transaction coun te rs ar e AD A complian t.

### • Re st ro oms -- ex tra wide to ilet s ta lls. Unise x and Fa mily r es tr ooms equipped fo r persons with disabilities. • Ramps fr om s tr eet t o sidew alk lev els at T

erminal en trances. • Check - in ticketing lanes

### • Signage conforms to AD A re quir emen ts • An in - house design r eview

design r pr ocess t o main ta in compliance of all new facilities. • Information Kiosks. • Service Animal Re lief St ations.• New W ayfinding -- Interior GPS syste m to guide passeng er s thru the airport with audible dir ections in an y languag e • Electr onic dir ect ories • Visual P aging • Guidebook • Special dr op - off or pick up locations at Curbside**Hartsfield -** **Jackson At**  **lanta International Airport**

City of A tlanta  Department of A viation



## Thank **Yo u**