alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:99-cr-00036-MP-AK

5:03-cr-00001-RH-AK

KEITH LORENZO SINGLETON,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 53, Motion to Continue Revocation of Supervised

Release Hearing, filed by Defendant Keith Singleton. In the motion, Defendant states that his

counsel will be out of town during the currently scheduled hearing, and because of this he

requests that the revocation of supervised release hearing set for July 16, 2008, be continued. 

The Government does not object to the requested continuance. Therefore, after considering the

matter, the Court grants Defendant’s motion. Accordingly, the revocation of supervised release

hearing is continued to a date to be set by separate notice. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of July, 2008

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 5:03-cr-00001-RH-AK Document 117 Filed 07/11/08 Page 1 of 1
#### § 3565.13 Exception authority.

An Agency official may request and the Administrator or designee may make an exception to any requirement or provision, or address any omission of this part, if the Administrator determines that application of the requirement or provision, or failure to take action, would adversely affect the government's interest or the program objectives, and provided that such an exception is not inconsistent with any applicable law or statutory requirement.

[64 FR 32372, June 16, 1999]
#### § 3434.2 Purpose.

The Secretary will follow the processes and criteria established in this regulation to certify and designate qualifying colleges and universities as HSACUs. Institutions designated as HSACUs will be eligible for five new programs authorized by Congress in section 7129 of the FCEA as well as for other ongoing NIFA programs for which HSACUs are now eligible (*e.g.,* integrated programs authorized by section 406 of the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998). The five new programs include the HSACU Endowment Fund (formula-based), HSACU Institutional Capacity Building Grants Program (competitive), HSACU Extension Grants Program (competitive), HSACU Applied and Fundamental Research Grants Program (competitive), and HSACU Equity Grants Program (formula-based). The administrative provisions, including reporting requirements, for the HSACU Endowment Fund will be established in a separate part (7 CFR part 3437). The administrative provisions and reporting requirements for the other four new HSACU programs will be established as subparts in 7 CFR part 3430.
# LI2021174EN.01000101.xml

| 18.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | LI 174/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

LI 174/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2021/796

of 17 May 2021

amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 concerning restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 17 May 2019 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 17 May 2019 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 (1).

| (2) | Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 applies until 18 May 2021. On the basis of a review of that Decision, the restrictive measures set out therein should be extended until 18 May 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 applies until 18 May 2021. On the basis of a review of that Decision, the restrictive measures set out therein should be extended until 18 May 2022.

| (3) | Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 10 of Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 10

This Decision shall apply until 18 May 2022 and shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed, or amended as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 17 May 2021.

For the Council

The President

A. P. ZACARIAS

---

(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 of 17 May 2019 concerning restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States (OJ L 129 I 17.5.2019, p. 13).

1

---
(163 App. Div. 468)

#### NORTON v. ERIE R. CO.

(No. 178-M4.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 7, 1914.)

Death (§ 92*)—Wrongful Death—Amount Recoverable—Federal Employers’ Liability Act—Interest.

Code Civ. Proc. § 1904, providing that, when final judgment is rendered for plaintiff in an action for wrongful death, the clerk must add interest from decedent’s death and include it in the judgment, has no application to an action for wrongful death of an interstate railroad employé under the federal Employers’ Liability Act (Act April 22, 1908, c. 149, 35 Stat. 65, as amended by Act April 5, 1910, c. 143, 36 Stat. 291 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, p. 1324]), and, such act containing no provision for the addition of interest to the verdict, none was allowable.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Death, Cent. Dig. § 102; Dec. Dig. § 92.*]

Appeal from Special Term, Steuben County.

Action by Gertrude I. Norton, as administratrix of the gopds, etc., of Shadrach Norton, deceased, against the Erie Railroad .Company. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a retaxation of costs, she appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before KRUSE, P. J., and ROBSON, FOOTE, LAMBERT, and MERRELL, JJ.

James O. Sebring, of Corning, for appellant.

F. A. Robbins, of Rochester, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic. *&*§ number in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep’r Indexes

KRUSE, P. J.

The plaintiff seeks to have included in the judgment interest upon the verdict from the time of the death of the plaintiff’s *772intestate, as is provided by section 1904 of the Code of Civil Procedure. I think that section has no application to this case, for the reason that the action is brought under the federal Employers’ Liability Act, and the verdict rests solely upon the claim arising under that act. The federal statute is paramount and exclusive (Act April 22, 1908, c. 149, 35 Stat. 65 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, p. 1322], as amended by Act April 5, 1910, c. 143, 36 Stat. 291 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, p. 1325]; Mondou v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 223 U. S. 1, 32 Sup. Ct. 169, 56 L. Ed. 327, 38 L. R. A. [N. S.] 44; Taylor y. Taylor, 232 U. S. 363, 34 Sup. Ct. 350, 58 L. Ed.-, reversing 204 N. Y. 135, 97 N. E. 502, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 276), and the defendant’s liability may not be extended by the provisions of our statute. No provision is made in the federal act for adding such interest to the verdict, and I think the provisions of our statute may not be invoked for that purpose.

The order should therefore be affirmed, with $10 costs. All concur.
#### § 29.6002 Air-cured.

Tobacco cured under natural atmospheric conditions. Artificial heat sometimes is used to control excess humidity during the curing period to prevent pole-sweat, pole-burn, and shed-burn in damp weather. Air-cured tobacco should not carry the odor of smoke or fumes resulting from the application of artificial heat.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of ChiefFinancial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

The undersigned,the Chief Financial Officer of TransMontaigne Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)          the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005, filed onthe date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ RANDALL J. LARSON                                    |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Randall J. Larson                                        |
|   | *Chief  Financial Officer and  Chief Accounting Officer* |
|   | November 9, 2005                                    |

 

----
#### § 4287.369 Future recovery.

Unless notified otherwise by the Agency, after the final loss claim has been paid, the Lender must use reasonable efforts to attempt collection from any party still liable for Future Recovery. Any net proceeds from Future Recovery must be split Pro Rata between the Lender and the Agency based on the original amount of the loan guarantee. Any collection of Federal Debt made by the Federal Government from any liable party to the guaranteed loan will not be split with the Lender.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7526

RONALD THOMAS-BEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-97-1363-WMN)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Thomas-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The order from which Thomas-Bey appeals was filed on September 11, 1998, and entered on the district court’s docket sheet on

September 15, 1998. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and

79(a), September 15, 1998, is therefore the effective date of the

district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232,

1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Thomas-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Thomas-Bey v. Corcoran, No. CA97-1363-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 15, 1998).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 3201.15 Bedding, bed linens, and towels. ( a ) *Definition.* ( 1 ) Bedding is that group of woven cloth products used as coverings on a bed. Bedding includes products such as blankets, bedspreads, comforters, and quilts.
( 2 ) Bed linens are woven cloth sheets and pillowcases used in bedding.
( 3 ) Towels are woven cloth products used primarily for drying and wiping.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The minimum biobased content is 12 percent and shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the finished product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product. The 12 percent biobased content must be of a qualifying biobased feedstock. Cotton, wool, linen, and silk are not qualifying biobased feedstocks for the purpose of determining the biobased content of bedding, bed linens, and towels.
( c ) *Preference effective date.* No later than November 20, 2007, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased bedding, bed linens, and towels. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased bedding, bed linens, and towels.
[71 FR 13705, Mar. 16, 2006, as amended at 71 FR 67032, Nov. 20, 2006]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn Intelligent System for Monitoring the Microgravity Environment Quality On-Board the International Space StationAn intelligent system for monitoring the microgravity environment quality on-board the International Space Station is presented. The monitoring system uses a new approach combining Kohonen's self-organizing feature map, learning vector quantization, and back propagation neural network to recognize and classify the known and unknown patterns. Finally, fuzzy logic is used to assess the level of confidence associated with each vibrating source activation detected by the system.Document ID20020081297Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLin, Paul P.*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Jules, Kenol*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 2002Subject CategorySpacecraft Instrumentation And AstrionicsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2002-211809E-13504NAS 1.15:211809Meeting InformationMeeting: 2001 Instrumentation and Measurement Technology ConferenceLocation: BudapestCountry: HungaryStart Date: May 21, 2001End Date: May 23, 2001Sponsors:Institute of Electrical and Electronics EngineersFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 400-35-4CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020081297.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
###### Editorial Note on Part 47

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 64 FR 38108, July 15, 1999.

#### § 47.1 Meaning of words.

Words in the regulations in this part in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand.
#### § 3565.54 Transferability of the guarantee.

A lender must receive the Agency's approval prior to any sale or transfer of the loan guarantee.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of O2 Secure Wireless, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ India Creery India Creery, Interim Chief Financial Officer  Date: August 14, 2006   {A0032168.DOC}
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




The Board of Directors
Polk Audio, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-61463) on Form S-8 of Polk Audio, Inc. of our report dated May 5, 1998
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Polk Audio, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of March 29, 1998 and March 31, 1997 and the related consolidated statements
of earnings, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 29, 1998, and our report dated May 5, 1998
relating to the schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts for each of the
years in the three-year period ended March 29, 1998, which reports appear in the
annual report on Form 10-K of Polk Audio, Inc.



Baltimore, Maryland
June 23, 1998




                                    Page 110
#### SHEPARD, Appellant, v. CAMPBELL, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, *1143Fourth Department.

May 16, 1906.)

Action by Norman A. Shepard against Arthur A. Campbell.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM ZEON CORPORATION'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31,1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000796513
<NAME>                        Zeon Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                           145,521
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    492,965
<ALLOWANCES>                                      25,645
<INVENTORY>                                      429,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,212,943
<PP&E>                                           407,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                   251,471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,397,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            478,424
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          34,471
<OTHER-SE>                                       866,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,397,499
<SALES>                                        3,014,879
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,014,879
<CGS>                                          2,065,531
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    927,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (35,632)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 2,524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   54,876
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (27,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               82,776
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      82,776
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .24



</TABLE>
SECURITY AGREEMENT

 

THIS SECURITY AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of April 23, 2007, by EVEREST PROPERTIES II, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Debtor”), for the benefit of EAST WEST BANK, a California banking corporation (“Secured Party”).

 

RECITALS

 

A.    Secured Party is the payee of the Promissory Note of this date, executed by Debtor in the original principal amount of $9,000,000 (the “Note”). The Note, this Agreement and all other agreements evidencing or securing the loan evidenced by the Note are referred to as the “Loan Documents.”

 

B.        Debtor is executing this Agreement to grant to Secured Party a security interest in a promissory note held by Debtor. Secured Party would not make the loan evidenced by the Note without the security interest provided for in this Agreement. Debtor is therefore willing to deliver this Agreement to satisfy the conditions precedent to the funding of such loan.

 

AGREEMENT

 

1.         Security Interest. Debtor grants to Secured Party a security interest in all of Debtor’s rights to and interest in the following (collectively, the “Collateral”):

 

(a)       The promissory note (the “Assigned Note”) and the deed of trust (the “Assigned Deed of Trust”) described on Schedule 1 attached to this Agreement, together with any extensions, modifications, renewals and substitutions of or for the Assigned Note and Assigned Deed of Trust, and all other documents, instruments and agreements evidencing, securing or otherwise delivered in connection with the loans evidenced by the Assigned Note (collectively, the “Assigned Loan Documents”);

 

(b)        All amounts owing to Debtor pursuant to the Assigned Note, the Assigned Deed of Trust or the Assigned Loan Documents, whether under guaranties, indemnity agreements, insurance policies, other collateral or general intangibles arising or available in connection with the Assigned Note, Assigned Deed of Trust or Assigned Loan Documents; 

 

(c)       Any loan policies of title insurance issued in connection with the Assigned Deed of Trust;

 

(d)        All books, records, files, appraisals, reports; certificates, computer files and records and all other information in whatever form relating to the Assigned Note; and

 

----
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Keyuan Petrochemiclas, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A2 for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Chunfeng Tao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)T he information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.








Date:  October 15, 2010





/s/ Chunfeng Tao


Chunfeng Tao


Chief Executive Officer & Chairman
#### § 4284.501 Purpose.

This subpart outlines the Agency's polices and procedures for making grants for cooperative development in rural areas.
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Driftwood  Ventures,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.    The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


Date:  September 11, 2006


/s/ Keith Smith
---------------------------------------
Keith Smith, Principal Financial Officer