alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[107th Congress Public Law 215]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ215.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 1054]]

Public Law 107-215
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To expand the boundary of the Booker T. Washington National Monument, 
     and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Aug. 21, 2002 -  [H.R. 1456]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in <<NOTE: Booker T. Washington National 
Monument Boundary Adjustment Act of 2002. Virginia.>> Congress 
assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 16 USC 450ll note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Booker T. Washington National 
Monument Boundary Adjustment Act of 2002''.

SEC. 2. BOUNDARY OF BOOKER T. WASHINGTON NATIONAL MONUMENT EXPANDED.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the establishment of the 
Booker T. Washington National Monument'', approved April 2, 1956 (16 
U.S.C. 450ll et seq.), is amended by adding at the end the following new 
section:

``SEC. 5. <<NOTE: 16 USC 450ll-3.>> ADDITIONAL LANDS.

    ``(a) Lands Added to Monument.--The boundary of the Booker T. 
Washington National Monument is modified to include the approximately 15 
acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled `Boundary Map, Booker 
T. Washington National Monument, Franklin County, Virginia', numbered 
BOWA 404/80,024, and dated February 2001. The map shall be on file and 
available for inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park 
Service, Department of the Interior.
    ``(b) Acquisition of Additional Lands.--The Secretary of the 
Interior is authorized to acquire from willing owners the land or 
interests in land described in subsection (a) by donation, purchase with 
donated or appropriated funds, or exchange.
    ``(c) Administration of Additional Lands.--Lands added to the Booker 
T. Washington National Monument by subsection (a) shall be administered 
by the Secretary of the Interior as part of the monument in accordance 
with applicable laws and regulations.''.

    Approved August 21, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1456:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107-223 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 107-199 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 147 (2001):
                                    Oct. 2, considered and passed House
                                                        Vol. 148 (2002):
                                    Aug. 1, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:88-cr-01007-MP-AK

RICHARD KEITH WILLIAMS,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1206, Motion for Reconsideration, filed by

Defendant Williams. In the motion, Defendant requests reconsideration of the Court’s order

denying Defendant’s motion for sentence reduction, Doc. 1194. As Defendant states,

Amendment 505 to the Sentencing Guidelines changed the offense levels in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c),

the Drug Quantity Table, and U.S.S.G. § 1B 1.10 indicates that the change is retroactively

applicable. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1 .10(c), and U.S.S.G.App. C, amend. 505. Defendant was

sentenced to a statutorily mandated sentence of life imprisonment on June 28, 1991. Because the

amendments to the Drug Quantity Table had no effect on the Defendant’s sentencing range, he

therefore is not entitled to be considered for a reduction in his sentence based on 18 U.S.C.

3582(c)(2). Therefore, Defendant Williams’ motion for reconsideration is denied. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of December, 2007

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:88-cr-01007-MW-GRJ Document 1208 Filed 12/04/07 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         27
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               196
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       694,537
<OTHER-SE>                                     (694,341)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   196
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
22.1007 Requirement to obtain wage determinations.       The contracting officer shall obtain wage determinations for the following service contracts:                                       (a) 						            Each new solicitation and contract in excess of $2,500.                                          (b) 						            Each contract modification which brings the contract above $2,500 and-                                                         (1) 								                Extends the existing contract pursuant to an option clause or otherwise; or                                                            (2) 								                Changes the scope of the contract whereby labor requirements are affected significantly.                                                                             (c) 						            Each multiple year contract in excess of $2,500 upon-                                                         (1) 								                Annual anniversary date if the contract is subject to annual appropriations; or                                                            (2) 								                Biennial anniversary date if the contract is not subject to annual appropriations and its proposed term exceeds 2 years-unless otherwise advised by the Wage and Hour Division.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 22.10 - Service Contract Labor Standards
27.203-1 General.

(a) Unauthorized disclosure of classified subject matter, whether in patent applications or resulting

from the issuance of a patent, may be a violation of 18 U.S.C. 792, et seq. (Chapter 37-Espionage

and Censorship), and related statutes, and may be contrary to the interests of national security.

(b) Upon receipt of a patent application under paragraph (a) or (b) of the clause at 52.227-10, Filing

of Patent Applications-Classified Subject Matter, the contracting officer shall ascertain the proper

security classification of the patent application. If the application contains classified subject matter,

the contracting officer shall inform the contractor how to transmit the application to the United

States Patent Office in accordance with procedures provided by legal counsel. If the material is

classified "Secret" or higher, the contracting officer shall make every effort to notify the contractor

within 30 days of the Government’s determination, pursuant to paragraph (a) of the clause.

(c) Upon receipt of information furnished by the contractor under paragraph (d) of the clause at

52.227-10, the contracting officer shall promptly submit that information to legal counsel in order

that the steps necessary to ensure the security of the application will be taken.

(d) The contracting officer shall act promptly on requests for approval of foreign filing under

paragraph (c) of the clause at 52.227-10 in order to avoid the loss of valuable patent rights of the

Government or the contractor.

Parent topic: 27.203 Security requirements for patent applications containing classified subject

matter.
4.001 Definitions.       As used in this part-          *Procurement Instrument Identifier (PIID)* means the Government-unique identifier for each solicitation, contract, agreement, or order. For example, an agency may use as its PIID for procurement actions, such as delivery and task orders or basic ordering agreements, the order or agreement number in conjunction with the contract number (see 4.1602).          *Supplementary procurement instrument identifier* means the non-unique identifier for a procurement action that is used in conjunction with the Government-unique identifier. For example, an agency may use as its PIID for an amended solicitation, the Government-unique identifier for a solicitation number (*e.g.*, N0002309R0009) in conjunction with a non-unique amendment number (*e.g.*, 0001). The non-unique amendment number represents the supplementary PIID.    **Parent topic:** Part 4 - Administrative and Information Matters
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Eadie, Appellanta.

Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings, in accordance with *715the same memorandum as in *People v Cadby*(75 AD2d 713). (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court—sodomy, first degree, and another charge.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Callahan and Moule, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of APA Optics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K  for  the  period  ending  March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anil K. Jain, Chief
Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  that:

1.   The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   The  information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Signature:  /s/  Anil  K.  Jain
            -------------------
Print  Name:  Anil  K.  Jain
              --------------
Print  Title:  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer
               ---------------------------------------------------------


<PAGE>
CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
              UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Chell Group Corporation (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending August 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"),
I, David Bolink, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my best
knowledge:

      (1) the Annual  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.

Date: October 22, 2004

                                    /s/ David Bolink
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    David Bolink
                                    President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                    Accounting Officer
#### G. L. Root Oil, Ltd., Appellant-Respondent, v State of New York, Respondent-Appellant.

(Claim No. 60743.)

Cross appeals from a judgment in favor of claimant, entered April 2, 1979, upon a decision of the Court of Claims. The claim sought compensation for the appropriation of a gasoline service station bounded by streets on all three of its triangular sides and located in the Village of Owego. The Court of Claims found, upon the evidence before it, that a portion of the garage structure and certain improvements were located upon State land prior to the appropriation. In spite of claimant’s protestations, that finding is not against the weight of the evidence. The claimant’s appraise/ valued the appropriated parcel at $19,-200 and the State’s appraiser valued it at $8,750 before the appropriation. *710The Court of Claims valued the property at $12,850 which is well within the range of the testimony. The claimant contends that the court erred because it did not adopt its calculation of fair rental value based on the number of gallons sold. The court’s decision reveals that it relied upon all of the proffered evidence of value and considered the expert opinions. The unusual circumstances of a small parcel of land with encroachments existing on State land would certainly be a matter which a prospective purchaser would consider. Upon this record the court’s determination of value is not without support and should not be disturbed. On the issue of consequential damages to a noncontiguous structure used for storage, the court duly explained why it did not accept the claimant’s estimation of damages. The findings that the unity of use was not for a substantial portion of the premises and that the limited use of the premises was not in accordance with the highest and best use of the land are in accord with the evidence. Accordingly, the claimant’s attempt to recover the full value of the structure has no support in the record. The award of $500 for consequential damages is reasonable on the record, and, therefore, the award of consequential damages should not be disturbed. Although the State has cross-appealed, it stated in its brief that it is not pursuing the cross appeal. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
# L_2021430DE.01004301.xml

| 2.12.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 430/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 430/43

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2021/923 der Kommission vom 25. März 2021 zur Ergänzung der Richtlinie 2013/36/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates durch technische Regulierungsstandards zur Festlegung der Kriterien für die Definition der Managementverantwortung, der Kontrollaufgaben, der wesentlichen Geschäftsbereiche und einer erheblichen Auswirkung auf das Risikoprofil eines wesentlichen Geschäftsbereichs sowie zur Festlegung der Kriterien für die Ermittlung der Mitarbeiter oder Mitarbeiterkategorien, deren berufliche Tätigkeiten vergleichsweise ebenso wesentliche Auswirkungen auf das Risikoprofil des Instituts haben wie diejenigen der in Artikel 92 Absatz 3 der genannten Richtlinie aufgeführten Mitarbeiter oder Mitarbeiterkategorien

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 203 vom 9. Juni 2021
  )

Seite 1, Erwägungsgrund 1 Satz 2:

Anstatt:

„Dies dürfte insbesondere dann der Fall sein, wenn diese Mitarbeiter Managementzuständigkeiten für wesentliche Geschäftsbereiche oder für Kontrollaufgaben haben, da sie strategische oder andere grundlegende Entscheidungen treffen können, die sich auf die Geschäftstätigkeiten oder auf den angewendeten Kontrollrahmen auswirken.“

muss es heißen:

„Dies dürfte insbesondere dann der Fall sein, wenn diese Mitarbeiter Managementverantwortungen für wesentliche Geschäftsbereiche oder für Kontrollaufgaben haben, da sie strategische oder andere grundlegende Entscheidungen treffen können, die sich auf die Geschäftstätigkeiten oder auf den angewendeten Kontrollrahmen auswirken.“

Seite 5, Artikel 5 Buchstabe b:

Anstatt:

| „b) | der Mitarbeiter hat Managementzuständigkeiten für eine der in den Artikeln 79 bis 87 der Richtlinie 2013/36/EU genannten Risikokategorien oder ist stimmberechtigtes Mitglied eines Ausschusses, der für das Management einer der in diesen Artikeln genannten Risikokategorien zuständig ist;“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

der Mitarbeiter hat Managementzuständigkeiten für eine der in den Artikeln 79 bis 87 der Richtlinie 2013/36/EU genannten Risikokategorien oder ist stimmberechtigtes Mitglied eines Ausschusses, der für das Management einer der in diesen Artikeln genannten Risikokategorien zuständig ist;“

muss es heißen:

| „b) | der Mitarbeiter hat Managementverantwortungen für eine der in den Artikeln 79 bis 87 der Richtlinie 2013/36/EU genannten Risikokategorien oder ist stimmberechtigtes Mitglied eines Ausschusses, der für das Management einer der in diesen Artikeln genannten Risikokategorien zuständig ist;“. |
| --- | --- |

„b)

der Mitarbeiter hat Managementverantwortungen für eine der in den Artikeln 79 bis 87 der Richtlinie 2013/36/EU genannten Risikokategorien oder ist stimmberechtigtes Mitglied eines Ausschusses, der für das Management einer der in diesen Artikeln genannten Risikokategorien zuständig ist;“.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Consolidated
Capital Properties VI First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000755908
<NAME> CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          10,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          4,324
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,722
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,295
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   461
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   447
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        14
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
22.810 Solicitation provisions and contract

clauses.

(a) When a contract is contemplated that will include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity,

the contracting officer shall insert-

(1) The clause at 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities, in the solicitation and contract; and

(2) The provision at 52.222-22, Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports, in the solicitation.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.222-23, Notice of Requirement for

Affirmative Action to Ensure Equal Employment Opportunity for Construction, in solicitations for

construction when a contract is contemplated that will include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal

Opportunity, and the amount of the contract is expected to be in excess of $10,000.

(c) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.222-24, Preaward On-Site Equal

Opportunity Compliance Evaluation, in solicitations other than those for construction when a

contract is contemplated that will include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, and the

amount of the contract is expected be $10 million or more.

(d) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.222-25, Affirmative Action Compliance, in

solicitations, other than those for construction, when a contract is contemplated that will include the

clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.

(e) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, in solicitations

and contracts (see 22.802) unless the contract is exempt from all of the requirements of E.O.11246

(see 22.807(a)). If the contract is exempt from one or more, but not all, of the requirements of

E.O.11246, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its Alternate I.

(f) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.222-27, Affirmative Action Compliance

Requirements for Construction, in solicitations and contracts for construction that will include the

clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, when the amount of the contract is expected to be in excess

of $10,000.

(g) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.222-29, Notification of Visa Denial, in

contracts that will include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, if the contractor is required

to perform in or on behalf of a foreign country.

Parent topic: Subpart 22.8 - Equal Employment Opportunity
#### In the Matter of Jessie Jordan, Petitioner, v Barbara Blum, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated October 12, 1978 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency insofar as it ordered the recovery of overpayments of assistance. Petition granted, determination annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements and respondents are directed to restore any moneys already recouped pursuant to the October 12, 1978 determination. We find that there is insufficient evidence in the record, as a whole, to sustain respondent State commissioner’s determination that petitioner was employed from January 7, 1977 through March 11, 1977 and willfully failed to report the income from such employment to the local agency (cf. *Matter of Hagood v Berger,*42 NY2d 901; *Matter of Bolden v Toia,*55 AD2d 677). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.