alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,687
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     43,310
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               187,663
<PP&E>                                          17,506
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,386
<BONDS>                                        140,062
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,754,585
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,812,585)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,448
<SALES>                                        131,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,583
<CGS>                                           88,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,490
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 60,389
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,097
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,916)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 10,097
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    60,389
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2008-1118; Dir ID 2007-NM-318-AD
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of ANTs software inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for the period ended December 31,
2007:





1.           Fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification is being provided
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is
it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.





Date:    March
14, 2008


/s/ Kenneth
      RuotoloKenneth
      Ruotolo, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the
Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request.
#### Leon R. Switzer, Appellant, v Sanitary District No. 7, Town of Hempstead, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent to reinstate petitioner to his prior position as secretary of the respondent sanitary district or, alternatively to pay petitioner for unused sick leave, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 29, 1979, which, after a hearing, dismissed the proceeding. Judgment modified, on the law, by adding thereto, immediately after the word "dismissed” the following: "only with respect to petitioner’s claim for reinstatement.” As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remitted to Special Term for a hearing on the question of unused sick leave. Appellant did not meet his burden of showing a lack of good faith on the part of the respondent sanitary district in abolishing his position. Rather, the record clearly shows that the abolition was motivated by reasons of economy and efficiency. Since appellant’s position was not improperly abolished, a hearing must now be held on the issue of appellant’s unused sick leave (see *Switzer v Sanitary Dist. No.*7, *Town of Hempstead,*59 AD2d 889). Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Hargett, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEquivalent circuit models for ac impedance data analysisA least-squares fitting routine has been developed for the analysis of ac impedance data. It has been determined that the checking of the derived equations for a particular circuit with a commercially available electronics circuit program is essential. As a result of the investigation described, three equivalent circuit models were selected for use in the analysis of ac impedance data.Document ID19900015961Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsDanford, M. D.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:100402NASA-TM-100402Accession Number90N25277Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900015961.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

HistoryMilitary PersonnelMilitary ScienceMilitary TrainingStudy Guides

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

**Note:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Page 1 of 2

1

 United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 5:00cr2/SPM

5:03cv136/SPM/MD

BYRON DANIELS,

Defendant.

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s request for a certificate of

appealability. (doc. 364). Because Defendant has not made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right, his request for a certificate of appealability will

be denied. 

As explained in the Report and Recommendation (doc. 345), the Court’s

determination of the amount of cocaine attributable to Defendant had no practical

effect on his guideline sentence because the jury found Defendant guilty of an

offense involving more than five kilograms of cocaine (see doc. 197), which on its

own justified Defendant’s base offense level of 32. Defendant’s complaint about his

fine and the delegation of his payment schedule to the probation officer is not

cognizable on § 2255 review. Blaik v. United States, 161 F.3d 1341, 1342-43 (11th

Cir. 1998). Finally, to the extent Defendant claims relief based on Booker1, Booker

is not retroactive on collateral review. Varela v. United States, 400 F.3d. 864, 868

(11th Cir. 2005). Defendant’s position on these matters are not debatable among

Case 5:00-cr-00002-RH-MD Document 369 Filed 07/05/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

 Case No: 5:00cr2/SPM; 5:03cv40/SPM/MD

reasonable jurists.

Based on the foregoing, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s request for a certificate of

appealability is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of July, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 5:00-cr-00002-RH-MD Document 369 Filed 07/05/05 Page 2 of 2
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amalgamated Pictures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 19, 2009

| /s/ Avery Pack                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| Avery Pack, President and          Chief Executive Officer          (Principal Executive Officer) and          Acting Chief Financial Officer          (Principal Financial Officer and          Principal Accounting Officer) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT September 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR FISCAL QUARTER ENDED September 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<CASH>                            1,906,745
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,206,840
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                         440,949
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  4,105,913
<PP&E>                            5,685,265
<DEPRECIATION>                    4,097,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   13,031,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             2,573,414
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                         130,723
<COMMON>                          1,929,394
<OTHER-SE>                        6,100,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     13,031,991
<SALES>                           2,300,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  2,745,055
<CGS>                             1,856,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     2,017,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  3,267,873
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   95,888
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (2,635,954)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (2,635,954)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (2,635,954)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.16)



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.140 Approval of initial Management Expenses.

A RBIC must have its Management Expenses approved by the Agency at the time it is licensed. (*See* § 4290.520 for the definition of Management Expenses.)
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Transnational Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form  10-KSB/A-1  for the fiscal year ended ended January 31, 2004
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Paul L. Dailey,  Executive  Vice  President  and Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


/s/ Paul L. Dailey
------------------
Paul L. Dailey
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 21,2004

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
#### § 51.1163 Damage.

*Damage* means any specific defect described in § 51.1175, Table I; or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects, which materially detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the fruit.
13.302 Purchase orders.

13.302-1 General.

13.302-2 Unpriced purchase orders.

13.302-3 Obtaining contractor acceptance and modifying purchase orders.

13.302-4 Termination or cancellation of purchase orders.

13.302-5 Clauses.

Parent topic: Subpart 13.3 - Simplified Acquisition Methods
§ 3201.141 Product packaging. ( a ) *Definition.* Product packaging items are used to protect, handle, and retain a product during activities related but not limited to its storage, distribution, sale, and use. These containers are typically designed to be used once. This category excludes packing and insulating materials and shopping and trash bags.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 25 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased product packaging. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased product packaging.
( d ) *Determining overlap with a designated product category in the EPA's CPG program.* Qualifying products within this product category may overlap with the EPA's CPG-designated recovered content product category of Paper Products: Paperboard and Packaging. USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information on the BioPreferred Program's website about the intended uses of the product, information on whether the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether a qualifying biobased product overlaps with the EPA's CPG-designated product category of Paper Products: Paperboard and Packaging and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing.
Note 1 to Paragraph ( d
):
Product packaging within this designated product category can compete with similar product packaging with recycled content. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CPG-designated Paper Products: Paperboard and Packaging containing recovered materials as products for which Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.10.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6587

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ADRIAN HOWARD JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (0:98-cr-01126-JFA)

Submitted: September 11, 2007 Decided: September 14, 2007

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adrian Howard Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Adrian Howard Jackson appeals the district court’s order

denying his Rule 59(e) motion to reconsider the denial of his Rule

60(b)(4) motion and alternatively to allow his pleadings to serve

as a notice of appeal of the Rule 60(b) motion. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Jackson, No. 0:98-cr-01126-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# 3.202 Contract clause.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.203-3, Gratuities, in *solicitations* and contracts with a value exceeding the *simplified acquisition threshold*, except those for personal services and those between military departments or defense agencies and foreign governments that do not obligate any funds appropriated to the Department of Defense.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 3.2 - Contractor Gratuities to Government Personnel
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION Case No.: 3:19md2885

This Document Relates to: 

Theodore Elwood Finley, 7:20cv170-MCR-GRJ

___________________________________/

 JUDGMENT

Final judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff, THEODORE ELWOOD 

FINLEY, and against Defendants, 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL 

SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, 

AEARO LLC, and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, in the amount of One 

Million, Five-Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000.00) for past pain and 

suffering, Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000.00) for future pain and suffering, for a 

total of Seven Million, Five-Hundred Thousand ($7,500,000.00) in compensatory 

damages plus Fifteen Million ($15,000,000.00) in exemplary damages, for a total 

award of Twenty-Two Million, Five-Hundred Thousand ($22,500,000.00), 

together with costs taxed against Defendants and post-judgment interest to be 

calculated from December 13, 2021.

Case 7:20-cv-00170-MCR-GRJ Document 178 Filed 12/13/21 Page 1 of 2
JESSICA J LYUBLANOVITS,

CLERK OF COURT

December 13, 2021 s/Samantha Buckhalt

DATE DEPUTY CLERK

Case 7:20-cv-00170-MCR-GRJ Document 178 Filed 12/13/21 Page 2 of 2
9.308 Contract clauses.

9.308-1 Testing performed by the contractor.

9.308-2 Testing performed by the Government.

Parent topic: Subpart 9.3 - First Article Testing and Approval
9.206 Acquisitions subject to qualification

requirements.

9.206-1 General.

9.206-2 Contract clause.

9.206-3 Competition.

Parent topic: Subpart 9.2 - Qualifications Requirements
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.20 Legal basis and applicability of this part 4290.

The regulations in this part implement Subtitle H of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 2009cc *et seq.*) (“Act”). All RBICs must comply with all applicable regulations, accounting guidelines and valuation guidelines for RBICs.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             TDI HOLDING CORPORATION
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of TDI Holding Corporation for the fiscal year ending March 31,
2003:

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of TDI
Holding Corporation.





/s/ Blair Zykan
Blair Zykan
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
July 15, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to TDI Holding Corporation and
will be retained by TDI Holding Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission upon request.