alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
,-,- F

,

'61

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

PR 21-0005

IN RE THE MOTION OF JAESON D.

WHITE FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR

OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

FILED

JUN 1 5 2021

Bower) Greenw000

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Mor-utano

ORDER

Jaeson D. White has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of Montana

pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions

Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on

Character and Fitness has certified that White has provided the necessary documentation

and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions

Administrator, Jaeson D. White may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk

of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State

Bar of Montana.

DATED this -5 day of June, 2021.

06/15/2021

Case Number: PR 21-0005
'46 

jgroitire.441 3

AtI 

Justices
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000757528
<NAME> First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd. - 3
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                   8,325,900
<SECURITIES>                                62,500
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0     
<INVENTORY>                                      0     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         8,411,700     
<PP&E>                                  20,818,100     
<DEPRECIATION>                           5,651,000    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          29,439,900     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    1,229,100     
<BONDS>                                          0     
<COMMON>                                         0     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0      
<PREFERRED>                                      0      
<OTHER-SE>                              28,167,700     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            29,439,900      
<SALES>                                          0     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         3,034,700     
<CGS>                                            0      
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,130,300      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           166,700     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,110,800     
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      1,110,800      
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0     
<CHANGES>                                        0      
<NET-INCOME>                             1,110,800     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                19.95        
<EPS-DILUTED>                                19.95      
        
                                  





</TABLE>
----

News
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WILLIE JAMES FLANDERS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 4:20cv342-TKW-HTC

A CANNON and C ATKINS,

Defendants.

______________________/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 22). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that the Plaintiff has not alleged facts that would 

establish a Fourteenth Amendment claim independent from his Eighth Amendment 

claim. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendants’ partial motion to dismiss (Doc. 20) is GRANTED, and the 

Fourteenth Amendment claims in the amended complaint are DISMISSED.

Case 4:20-cv-00342-TKW-HTC Document 23 Filed 03/29/21 Page 1 of 2
2

3. This case is recommitted to the magistrate judge for further proceedings 

on Plaintiff’s remaining claims.

DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of March, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00342-TKW-HTC Document 23 Filed 03/29/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DAVID BAITY,

Petitioner,

v. 4:03cv356-WS

JAMES V. CROSBY,

Respondent.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed 

June 17, 2005. See Doc. 22. The magistrate judge recommends that the petitioner's

petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. The petitioner has filed objections (doc.

11) to the magistrate judge’s report. Doc. 23.

Having carefully considered the record in light of the objections, this court has

determined that the petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus must be denied for the

reasons given by the magistrate judge.

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 22) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

Case 4:03-cv-00356-WS-WCS Document 24 Filed 07/18/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:03cv356-WS

2. The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is hereby DENIED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this July 18, 2005.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:03-cv-00356-WS-WCS Document 24 Filed 07/18/05 Page 2 of 2
### BRIEFING ON THE REAUTHORIZATION   OF THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES   EDUCATION ACT (IDEA)

**APRIL 12, 2002**

Commission Recommendations   for the Reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)

Making a Good IDEA Better (Briefing   Paper)

Briefing Transcript

Bios of Briefing   Panelists

Acknowledgments
#### § 5001.119 Ineligible REAP projects.

Owner occupied bed and breakfasts are ineligible projects in the REAP program.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American CommercialLines Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Mark R. Holden, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company.     /s/ Mark R. Holden       Mark R. Holden     President and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 11, 2006
EXHIBIT 31.01
CERTIFICATION
       I, Michael D. Alexander, certifythat:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of The Furia Organization, Inc. for the three month period endedSeptember 30, 2004;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this quarterly report; 
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and have

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date");and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

6.     The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: April 1, 2005
By: 
/s/ Michael D. Alexander    
 
Michael D. Alexander
 
Chief Executive Officer

****
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Edward McDuffy, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The only issue raised by the petitioner in his petition is the failure to comply with section 335-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The record shows substantial compliance with the code, and the order dismissing the writ should be affirmed. (Appeal from order of Cayuga County Court dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Del Yecehio and Marsh, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Estes, 7:20cv137

Hacker, 7:20cv131

Keefer, 7:20cv104

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 3

This Order addresses the Defendants’ objections and counter-designations to 

Plaintiffs’ affirmative deposition designations and Plaintiffs’ objections to 

Defendants’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions: 

1. Doug Moses 30(b)(6), 10-17-2019

2. Doug Moses, 12-05-2019

3. Doug Moses, 12-06-2019

The Court’s rulings with respect to the above depositions are set forth in the 

attached Exhibit 1. 

SO ORDERED, on this 18th day of March, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

PAUL WHITE,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-242-AW-GRJ

SECRETARY, FLA. DEP’T OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Paul White is serving a life sentence for sexual battery on a child. At issue is 

his § 2254 petition. The State moved to dismiss the petition, contending it is 

untimely. ECF No. 11. The magistrate judge has issued a report and 

recommendation, concluding the petition should be dismissed. ECF No. 15. Having 

fully considered the matter—and having considered de novo the issues raised in 

White’s objections (ECF No. 16)—I now dismiss the petition. 

As White acknowledges, his petition comes long after the AEDPA one-year 

limitations period ran. His claim is that he can proceed through the actual-innocence

gateway. But like the magistrate judge, I conclude White has not shown that he can 

meet this exception. Cf. McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 386 (2013) (cautioning 

“that tenable actual-innocence gateway pleas are rare: A petitioner does not meet the 

threshold requirement unless he persuades the district court that, in light of the new 
2

evidence, no juror, acting reasonably, would have voted to find him guilty beyond a 

reasonable doubt.” (marks omitted) (quoting Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 329

(1995)).

The report and recommendation (ECF No. 15) is adopted and incorporated 

into this order. The motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED. The clerk will

enter a judgment that says, “The § 2254 petition is dismissed as untimely.” The clerk 

will then close the file.

A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

SO ORDERED on June 19, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 3:20-cr-74-TKW

COLIN FISHER

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. 

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts One and Two of the

Information. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning 

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined the guilty plea was knowing 

and voluntary and the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact 

containing each of the essential elements thereof. I therefore recommend the plea 

of guilty be accepted and the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence 

imposed accordingly.

Dated: August 31, 2020.

/s/ Hope Thai Cannon HOPE THAI CANNON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00074-TKW Document 20 Filed 08/31/20 Page 1 of 2
3:20-cr-74-TKW

Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed 

within twenty-four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different 

deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use 

only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the 

magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a magistrate 

judge's findings or recommendations contained in a report and 

recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 

waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on 

unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir. Rule 

3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Case 3:20-cr-00074-TKW Document 20 Filed 08/31/20 Page 2 of 2
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Cognitive PsychologyCognitive StyleConcept FormationConstructivism (Learning)Educational ChangeElementary Secondary EducationMathematics CurriculumMathematics EducationScience CurriculumScience Education

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         505,571
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               882,802
<PP&E>                                         10,744,015
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,636,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,272,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          444,102
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,115,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,272,627
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,057,208
<CGS>                                          333,970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  477,179
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (10,082)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               230,919
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                25,222
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            25,222
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   25,222
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.49
        


</TABLE>
§ 301.91-2 Regulated articles. ( a ) *List of regulated articles.* The Deputy Administrator has determined that certain articles present a risk of spreading European larch canker. A list of all such regulated articles is found on the internet at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/plant-disease/elc/european-larch-canker*. Lists of all regulated articles may also be obtained by request from any local Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) office; local offices are listed in telephone directories and on the internet at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/ppq-program-overview/sphd*.
( b ) *Normal process for designating additional regulated articles.* ( 1 ) If the Deputy Administrator determines that an article not already listed at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/plant-disease/elc/european-larch-canker* presents a risk of spreading European larch canker, APHIS will publish a notice in the Federal Register proposing to designate the article as a regulated article for European larch canker. The notice will provide the basis for this determination, and will request public comment.
( 2 ) If no comments are received on the notice, or if the comments do not change the Deputy Administrator's determination, APHIS will publish a second notice in the Federal Register designating the article as a regulated article for European larch canker and listing it.
( c ) *Immediate designation of regulated articles.* An inspector may designate any other product, article, or means of conveyance as a regulated article for European larch canker, if the inspector determines that it presents a risk of spreading European larch canker, and after the inspector provides actual notification to the person in possession of the product, article, or means of conveyance that it is subject to the restrictions of this subpart.
[87 FR 80017, Dec. 29, 2022]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EUGENIO L. RODRIGUEZ,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00146-CR

Appeal from the

109th District Court

of Andrews County, Texas 

(TC# 1532)

O R D E R

The Appellant’s brief in the above styled and numbered cause was due December 22, 2021.

As of the date of this order, no brief or motion for extension of time to file the brief has been filed 

with this Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing to determine whether

Appellant wishes to continue the appeal and is entitled to appointment of counsel. Further, the 

trial court shall forward its findings to the District Clerk of Andrews County, Texas, on or 

before February 3, 2022. The District Clerk shall prepare and forward a supplemental clerk’s 

record containing the findings and forward the same to this Court on or before February 13, 

2022. Further, the transcription of the hearing shall be prepared, certified and filed with this Court 

on or before February 13, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of January, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
Exhibit 12.2CERTIFICATIONI, Xu Hang, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mindray Medical International Limited;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe company and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: June 27, 2007/s/ Xu Hang