FORM 10-QSB--QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                        THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                        Quarterly or Transitional Report



                      U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2000


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14099


                         CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
         (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                              94-2940204
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                      (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)


Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act  during the  preceding  12 months (or for such
shorter period that the Partnership was required to file such reports),  and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No___



<PAGE>



                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

a)

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)

                               September 30, 2000
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $  656
   Receivables and deposits                                                     139
   Other assets                                                                 139
   Investment property:
      Land                                                    $  916
      Buildings and related personal property                  9,725
                                                              10,641
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (4,689)         5,952

                                                                            $ 6,886
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficit) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $   14
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           83
   Accrued property taxes                                                       101
   Other liabilities                                                            115
   Mortgage note payable                                                      5,507

Partners' (Deficit) Capital
   General partner                                             $  (1)
   Special limited partners                                      (73)
   Limited partners (181,300 units issued and
      outstanding)                                             1,140          1,066

                                                                            $ 6,886
</TABLE>

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
<PAGE>

b)

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                          Three Months               Nine Months
                                       Ended September 30,       Ended September 30,
                                        2000         1999         2000         1999

   Revenues:
<S>                                    <C>           <C>         <C>          <C>
      Rental income                    $  423        $ 414       $ 1,281      $ 1,260
      Other income                         46           42           125          117
          Total revenues                  469          456         1,406        1,377

   Expenses:
      Operating                           200          225           588          548
      General and administrative           67           42           152          126
      Depreciation                        104           68           325          255
      Interest                            109          109           371          327
      Property taxes                       34           29           109           83
          Total expenses                  514          473         1,545        1,339

   Net (loss) income                   $ (45)       $ (17)       $  (139)       $  38

   Net (loss) income allocated to
      general partner (0.2%)            $  --        $ --         $   --         $ --

   Net (loss) income allocated to
      limited partners (99.8%)            (45)         (17)         (139)          38

                                       $  (45)       $ (17)       $ (139)       $  38

   Net (loss) income per limited
      partnership unit                $ (0.25)     $ (0.09)      $ (0.77)     $ 0.21
</TABLE>

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


<PAGE>


c)

                         CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIT) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                    Limited                 Special
                                  Partnership    General    Limited   Limited
                                     Units       Partner   Partners   Partners     Total

<S>                                 <C>            <C>       <C>      <C>         <C>
Original capital contributions      181,808        $ 1       $ --     $45,452     $45,453

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at December 31, 1999             181,300       $ (1)      $ (79)   $ 1,285     $ 1,205

Amortization of timing
   difference                            --          --          6         (6)         --

Net loss for the nine months
   ended September 30, 2000              --          --         --       (139)       (139)

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at September 30, 2000            181,300       $ (1)      $ (73)   $ 1,140     $ 1,066
</TABLE>


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

<PAGE>

d)

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Nine Months Ended
                                                                   September 30,
                                                                  2000        1999
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>
  Net (loss) income                                              $ (139)      $   38
  Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net
   cash provided by operating activities:
   Depreciation                                                     325          255
   Amortization of loan costs                                         5           19
  Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                       86          101
      Other assets                                                    3          (20)
      Accounts payable                                              (23)          95
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                             4           10
      Accrued property taxes                                        (19)         (27)
      Other liabilities                                            (104)          (7)
         Net cash provided by operating activities                  138          464

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (234)        (279)
  Net withdrawals from (deposits to) restricted escrows             135          (17)
         Net cash used in investing activities                      (99)        (296)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage notes payable                                (83)         (53)
  Loan costs paid                                                   (35)          --
  Distributions paid to partners                                 (2,297)          --
         Net cash used in financing activities                   (2,415)         (53)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents             (2,376)         115
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                  3,032        1,862
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                       $  656      $ 1,977

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                         $  366        $ 308

Distributions  to partners of  approximately  $2,297,000 was accrued at December
31, 1999 and paid in January 2000.
</TABLE>

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

<PAGE>

e)

                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
                     NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying  unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements of Consolidated
Capital  Properties VI (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial  statements.  In the opinion of ConCap  Equities,  Inc.  ("CEI" or the
"General  Partner"),  all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.  Operating
results for the three and nine month periods ended  September 30, 2000,  are not
necessarily  indicative  of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year
ending  December 31, 2000. For further  information,  refer to the  consolidated
financial  statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.

Principles of Consolidation

The  Partnership's  financial  statements  include  the  accounts  of  Colony of
Springdale Associates, Ltd. ("Colony Associates"),  which holds fee title to the
Colony of Springdale  Apartments.  The results of its operations are included in
the   Partnership's   consolidated   financial   statements.   All  inter-entity
transactions between the Partnership and Colony Associates have been eliminated.

Note B - Transfer of Control

Pursuant  to a series  of  transactions  which  closed  on  October  1, 1998 and
February 26, 1999,  Insignia Financial Group, Inc. and Insignia Properties Trust
merged into Apartment  Investment and Management Company  ("AIMCO"),  a publicly
traded real estate investment trust, with AIMCO being the surviving  corporation
(the "Insignia Merger").  As a result, AIMCO acquired 100% ownership interest in
the General Partner.  The General Partner does not believe that this transaction
has had or will have a material  effect on the  affairs  and  operations  of the
Partnership.

Note C - Related Party Transactions

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The Partnership  Agreement  provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership.  The following expenses were paid or accrued to an affiliate of the
General Partner during the nine months ended September 30, 2000 and 1999:

                                                                  2000      1999
                                                                  (in thousands)

 Property management fees (included in operating expenses)        $ 69      $ 68
 Reimbursement for services of affiliates (included in
   investment property and operating and general and
   administrative expenses)                                         85        44

During the nine months  ended  September  30, 2000 and 1999,  affiliates  of the
General  Partner  were  entitled  to  receive  5% of  gross  receipts  from  the
Partnership's   property  as  compensation  for  providing  property  management
services.  The  Partnership  paid to such affiliates  approximately  $69,000 and
$68,000  for  each of the  nine  months  ended  September  30,  2000  and  1999,
respectively.

An  affiliate  of the General  Partner  received  reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $85,000 and $44,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  currently own 79,035 limited partnership
units in the Partnership representing 43.593% of the outstanding units. A number
of these  units were  acquired  pursuant  to tender  offers made by AIMCO or its
affiliates.  It is possible that AIMCO or its  affiliates  will make one or more
additional offers to acquire  additional  limited  partnership  interests in the
Partnership  for cash or in exchange for units in the operating  partnership  of
AIMCO.  In this regard,  on August 2, 2000,  an  affiliate of AIMCO  commenced a
tender offer to purchase any and all of the remaining Partnership interest for a
purchase  price of  $11.67  per  limited  partnership  unit.  As a  result,  the
affiliate  of  AIMCO  acquired  4,783  limited   partnership  units.  Under  the
Partnership Agreement,  unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled
to take action with respect to a variety of matters, which would include without
limitation, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting
to remove the General  Partner.  As a result of its  ownership of 43.593% of the
outstanding units, AIMCO is in a position to significantly  influence all voting
decisions with respect to the Registrant. When voting on matters, AIMCO would in
all likelihood vote the Units it acquired in a manner  favorable to the interest
of the General Partner because of their affiliation with the General Partner.

Note D - Commitment

The  Partnership  is  required  to  maintain   working   capital   reserves  for
contingencies  of not less than 5% of Net  Invested  Capital  as  defined in the
Partnership  Agreement.  In the event expenditures are made from these reserves,
operating revenue shall be allocated to such reserves to the extent necessary to
maintain the foregoing level. Reserves, consisting of cash and cash equivalents,
tenant security  deposits and investments  totaling  approximately  $782,000 are
less than the reserve  requirement of approximately  $2,070,000 at September 30,
2000. On September 16, 2000, the Partnership sought the vote of limited partners
to  amend  the  Partnership  Agreement  to  eliminate  the  requirement  for the
Partnership to maintain  reserves equal to at least 5% of the limited  partners'
capital  contributions less distributions to limited partners and instead permit
the  General  Partner  to  determine  reasonable  reserve  requirements  of  the
Partnership. The vote was sought pursuant to a Consent Solicitation that expired
on October 16, 2000 at which time the  amendment  was approved by the  requisite
percent of limited partnership interests. Upon expiration of the consent period,
a total number of 110,551  units had voted of which  102,214  units had voted in
favor of the  amendment,  6,832  voted  against  the  amendment  and 1,505 units
abstained.

Note E - Change in Status of Non-Corporate General Partner

During the year ended December 31, 1991, the  Partnership  Agreement was amended
to convert the  general  partner  interests  held by the  non-corporate  general
partner,  Consolidated  Capital  Group II  ("CCG"),  to that of special  limited
partners ("Special Limited Partners").  The Special Limited Partners do not have
a vote and do not have any of the other rights of a Limited  Partner  except the
right to inspect  the  Partnership's  books and  records;  however,  the Special
Limited Partners  retained the economic  interest in the Partnership  which they
previously owned as general partner.

CEI became the sole general  partner of the Partnership  effective  December 31,
1991. In connection with CCG's conversion,  a special allocation of gross income
was made to the Special  Limited  Partners in order to  eliminate  its tax basis
negative capital account.

After the conversion,  the various Special Limited Partners transferred portions
of their  interests to CEI so that CEI now holds a .2% interest in all allocable
items of income,  loss and  distribution.  The  differences  between the Special
Limited  Partners'  capital  accounts for financial  statement and tax reporting
purposes are being amortized to the Limited  Partners'  capital  accounts as the
components of the timing differences which created the balance reverse.

Note F - Distributions

A distribution  of  approximately  $2,297,000  (approximately  $2,250,000 to the
limited  partners or $12.41 per  limited  partnership  unit) was accrued  during
December 1999 and paid in January 2000. This distribution consisted of cash from
operations of approximately $1,175,000  (approximately $1,128,000 to the limited
partners  or $6.22 per limited  partnership  unit) and  refinancing  proceeds of
approximately  $1,122,000 to the limited partners ($6.19 per limited partnership
unit).  No  distributions  were made during the nine months ended  September 30,
1999.

Note G - Segment Reporting

Description  of the types of products  and  services  from which the  reportable
segment derives its revenues:

The  Partnership  has  one  reportable  segment:   residential  properties.  The
Partnership's  residential property segment consists of one apartment complex in
Ohio.  The  Partnership  rents  apartment  units to  tenants  for terms that are
typically twelve months or less.

Measurement of segment profit or loss:

The  Partnership  evaluates  performance  based on segment  profit (loss) before
depreciation.  The accounting policies of the reportable segment are the same as
those of the Partnership as described in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999.

Segment  information  for the three and nine month periods  ended  September 30,
2000 and 1999 (in  thousands) is shown in the tables below.  The "Other"  column
includes  Partnership  administration  related  items and income and expense not
allocated to the reportable segment.


 Three Months Ended September 30, 2000   Residential     Other       Totals

Rental income                               $  423        $  --       $ 423
Other income                                    42            4          46
Interest expense                               109           --         109
Depreciation                                   104           --         104
General and administrative expense              --           67          67
Segment profit (loss)                           18          (63)        (45)


  Nine Months Ended September 30, 2000   Residential     Other       Totals

Rental income                              $ 1,281       $   --     $ 1,281
Other income                                   102           23         125
Interest expense                               371           --         371
Depreciation                                   325           --         325
General and administrative expense              --          152         152
Segment loss                                   (10)        (129)       (139)
Total assets                                 6,474          412       6,886
Capital expenditures for
  investment property                          234           --         234


  Three Months Ended September 30, 1999    Residential     Other      Totals

Rental income                                 $  414         $ --      $ 414
Other income                                      30           12         42
Interest expense                                 109           --        109
Depreciation                                      68           --         68
General and administrative expense                --           42         42
Segment profit (loss)                             13          (30)       (17)


  Nine Months Ended September 30, 1999     Residential     Other      Totals

Rental income                                $ 1,260       $   --    $ 1,260
Other income                                      70           47        117
Interest expense                                 327           --        327
Depreciation                                     255           --        255
General and administrative expense                --          126        126
Segment profit (loss)                            117          (79)        38
Total assets                                   6,568        1,812      8,380
Capital expenditures for
  investment property                            279           --        279

Note H - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial  Group,  Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs  named as defendants,  among others,
the   Partnership,   its  General  Partner  and  several  of  their   affiliated
partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action  purports to assert claims on
behalf of a class of limited  partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of
limited  partnerships  (including  the  Partnership)  which are named as nominal
defendants,  challenging the acquisition of interests in certain general partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units; the management of partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the  Insignia  Merger.  The  plaintiffs  seek
monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial  dissolution of the
Partnership.  On June 25,  1998,  the  General  Partner  filed a motion  seeking
dismissal of the action.  In lieu of  responding to the motion,  the  plaintiffs
have filed an amended  complaint.  The General  Partner  filed  demurrers to the
amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims,  subject to final court approval,  on behalf of the Partnership
and all limited  partners  who owned  units as of November 3, 1999.  Preliminary
approval of the settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at
which time the Court set a final approval  hearing for December 10, 1999.  Prior
to the December 10, 1999 hearing,  the Court received various  objections to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case.  The Court is considering  applications  for lead counsel and has
currently  scheduled a hearing on the matter for November 20, 2000.  The General
Partner  does not  anticipate  that  costs  associated  with  this  case will be
material to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

<PAGE>

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The  matters  discussed  in this Form  10-QSB  contain  certain  forward-looking
statements  and  involve  risks and  uncertainties  (including  changing  market
conditions,   competitive  and  regulatory   matters,   etc.)  detailed  in  the
disclosures  contained  in this  Form  10-QSB  and the  other  filings  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission made by the  Partnership  from time to time.
The  discussion  of  the  Partnership's  business  and  results  of  operations,
including  forward-looking  statements pertaining to such matters, does not take
into  account  the  effects of any  changes to the  Partnership's  business  and
results of operation.  Accordingly,  actual results could differ materially from
those  projected in the  forward-looking  statements  as a result of a number of
factors, including those identified herein.

The Partnership's  investment property consists of one apartment complex, Colony
of Springdale Apartments, located in Springdale, Ohio. The average occupancy for
the nine month  periods  ended  September  30,  2000 and 1999,  was 92% and 94%,
respectively.

Results of Operations

The Partnership  realized a net loss of approximately  $139,000  compared to net
income of approximately $38,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2000 and
1999, respectively. The Partnership realized a net loss of approximately $45,000
and  $17,000  for  the  three  months  ended   September   30,  2000  and  1999,
respectively.  The  increase  in net loss for the  three and nine  months  ended
September 30, 2000 is due to an increase in total expenses  partially  offset by
an increase in total revenues. The increase in total expenses for the nine month
period  is  due  to  increases  in   operating,   general  and   administrative,
depreciation,  property  tax,  and  interest  expenses.  The  increase  in total
expenses  for  the  three  month  period  is due to  increases  in  general  and
administrative  and  depreciation  expenses  partially  offset by a decrease  in
operating expense.

The increase in operating  expense for the nine month period is due primarily to
increased  maintenance,  insurance,  and property expenses.  Maintenance expense
increased as a result of decreased insurance proceeds received for casualty loss
repairs  during the nine months ended  September  30, 2000 compared to insurance
proceeds  received  for  casualty  loss  repairs  during the nine  months  ended
September 30, 1999. Insurance expense increased as a result of the timing of the
insurance  premium  invoice which  affected the timing of the accrual during the
nine months ended September 30, 1999.  Property expense increased as a result of
increased  salary,   employee  benefits,  and  utility  expenses  at  Colony  of
Springdale  Apartments.  The decrease in  operating  expense for the three month
period is due primarily to net insurance  expense  incurred for casualty repairs
during the three months ended  September  30, 1999.  No such costs were incurred
during the three months ended  September  30, 2000.  The increase in general and
administrative  expense is primarily due to an increase in the costs of services
included in the  management  reimbursements  to the  General  Partner as allowed
under the Partnership Agreement.  Costs associated with the quarterly and annual
communications  with  investors  and  regulatory  agencies  and the annual audit
required by the  Partnership  Agreement are also included at both  September 30,
2000 and 1999.  The increase in  depreciation  expense is due to the increase in
fixed asset additions during 1999 and 2000.  Interest  expense  increased due to
increased  interest paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2000 related
to the  refinancing of the  Partnership's  property during the fourth quarter of
1999 (see discussion  below).  The increase in total revenues resulted primarily
from an increase in rental income as the result of an increase in average rental
rates despite a slight decrease in occupancy.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner
monitors the rental market environment of its investment  property to assess the
feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and
protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the
General  Partner  attempts  to  protect  the  Partnership  from  the  burden  of
inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a
high overall occupancy level. However, due to changing market conditions,  which
can  result in the use of rental  concessions  and rental  reductions  to offset
softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the General Partner will
be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  September  30,  2000,  the  Partnership  had cash and  cash  equivalents  of
approximately $656,000 as compared to approximately  $1,977,000 at September 30,
1999. For the nine months ended  September 30, 2000,  cash and cash  equivalents
decreased by approximately $2,376,000 from the Partnership's year ended December
31, 1999.  The  decrease in cash and cash  equivalents  is due to  approximately
$2,415,000 of cash used in financing  activities  and  approximately  $99,000 of
cash used in investing  activities slightly offset by approximately  $138,000 of
cash  provided  by  operating  activities.  Cash  used in  financing  activities
consisted  primarily of  distributions  to the partners and, to a lesser extent,
loan costs paid,  and principal  payments made on the mortgage  encumbering  the
Partnership's  property. Cash used in investing activities consisted of property
improvements  and   replacements   partially  offset  by  net  withdrawals  from
restricted escrows  maintained by the mortgage lender.  The Partnership  invests
its working capital reserves in a money market account.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the property to adequately maintain the physical asset
and other operating  needs of the Registrant and to comply with Federal,  state,
and local legal and regulatory  requirements.  Capital  improvements planned for
the Partnership's property are discussed below.

During the nine month period ended September 30, 2000, the Partnership completed
approximately  $234,000 of budgeted and unbudgeted  capital  improvements at the
property. These improvements consisted primarily of appliance and floor covering
replacements, structural improvements, and roof replacements. These improvements
were funded from operating  cash flow and  replacement  reserves.  Approximately
$242,000 has been budgeted for capital  improvements at Colony of Springdale for
the year  2000  consisting  primarily  of floor  coverings,  sprinkler  systems,
plumbing  enhancements,  and  heating  units.  Additional  improvements  may  be
considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well as
replacement  reserves and anticipated  cash flow generated by the property.  The
capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations
or  from  Partnership  reserves.  To  the  extent  that  such  budgeted  capital
improvements are completed,  the Registrant's  distributable  cash flow, if any,
may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The  Partnership  is  required  to  maintain   working   capital   reserves  for
contingencies  of not less than 5% of Net  Invested  Capital  as  defined in the
Partnership  Agreement.  In the event expenditures are made from these reserves,
operating revenue shall be allocated to such reserves to the extent necessary to
maintain the foregoing level. Reserves,  consisting of cash and cash equivalents
and tenant security deposits and investments totaling approximately $782,000 are
less than the reserve  requirement of approximately  $2,070,000 at September 30,
2000. On September 16, 2000, the Partnership sought the vote of limited partners
to  amend  the  Partnership  Agreement  to  eliminate  the  requirement  for the
Partnership to maintain  reserves equal to at least 5% of the limited  partners'
capital  contributions less distributions to limited partners and instead permit
the  General  Partner  to  determine  reasonable  reserve  requirements  of  the
Partnership. The vote was sought pursuant to a Consent Solicitation that expired
on October 16, 2000 at which time the  amendment  was approved by the  requisite
percent of limited partnership interests. Upon expiration of the consent period,
a total number of 110,551  units had voted of which  102,214  units had voted in
favor of the  amendment,  6,832  voted  against  the  amendment  and 1,505 units
abstained.

On October 25, 1999, the Partnership  refinanced the mortgage encumbering Colony
of Springdale Apartments. Interest on the old mortgage was 9.5%. The refinancing
replaced  indebtedness  of  $4,247,000  with a new  mortgage  in the  amount  of
$5,600,000.  Interest on the new  mortgage is 7.79%.  Payments of  approximately
$46,000 are due on the first day of each month until the loan  matures  December
1, 2019. Loan costs of approximately $86,000 were capitalized as of December 31,
1999. Additional loan costs of approximately $35,000 were capitalized during the
nine months ended  September 30, 2000.  The loan costs are being  amortized over
the life of the  mortgage and the  amortization  expense is included in interest
expense.

The Partnership's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs  (exclusive  of capital  improvements)  of the  Partnership.  The mortgage
indebtedness  of  approximately  $5,507,000  is  amortized  over 240  months and
matures  December 1, 2019.  The General  Partner will attempt to refinance  such
indebtedness  and/or  sell the  property  prior to such  maturity  date.  If the
property cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient  amount,  the Partnership
will risk losing such property through foreclosure.

A distribution  of  approximately  $2,297,000  (approximately  $2,250,000 to the
limited  partners or $12.41 per  limited  partnership  unit) was accrued  during
December 1999 and paid in January 2000. This distribution consisted of cash from
operations of approximately $1,175,000  (approximately $1,128,000 to the limited
partners  or $6.22 per limited  partnership  unit) and  refinancing  proceeds of
approximately  $1,122,000 to the limited partners ($6.19 per limited partnership
unit).  No  distributions  were made during the nine months ended  September 30,
1999. Future cash  distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated
from  operations,  the  availability of cash reserves and the timing of the debt
maturity, refinancing and/or property sale. The Registrant's distribution policy
is reviewed on an annual  basis.  There can be no assurance,  however,  that the
Registrant will generate sufficient funds from operations after required capital
improvements  to  permit  further  distributions  to  its  partners  during  the
remainder of 2000 or subsequent periods.


<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial  Group,  Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs  named as defendants,  among others,
the   Partnership,   its  General  Partner  and  several  of  their   affiliated
partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action  purports to assert claims on
behalf of a class of limited  partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of
limited  partnerships  (including  the  Partnership)  which are named as nominal
defendants,  challenging the acquisition of interests in certain general partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited  partnership units; the management of partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the  Insignia  Merger.  The  plaintiffs  seek
monetary damages and equitable  relief,  including  judicial  dissolution of the
Partnership.  On June 25,  1998,  the  General  Partner  filed a motion  seeking
dismissal of the action.  In lieu of  responding to the motion,  the  plaintiffs
have filed an amended  complaint.  The General  Partner  filed  demurrers to the
amended complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims,  subject to final court approval,  on behalf of the Partnership
and all limited  partners  who owned  units as of November 3, 1999.  Preliminary
approval of the settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at
which time the Court set a final approval  hearing for December 10, 1999.  Prior
to the December 10, 1999 hearing,  the Court received various  objections to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December  14,  1999,  the General  Partner  and its  affiliates  terminated  the
proposed settlement.  In February 2000, counsel for some of the named plaintiffs
filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who negotiated
the settlement.  On June 27, 2000, the Court entered an order disqualifying them
from the case.  The Court is considering  applications  for lead counsel and has
currently  scheduled a hearing on the matter for November 20, 2000.  The General
Partner  does not  anticipate  that  costs  associated  with  this  case will be
material to the Partnership's overall operations.

Item 4.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

On September 16, 2000, the  Partnership  sought the vote of limited  partners to
amend the Partnership Agreement to eliminate the requirement for the Partnership
to  maintain  reserves  equal to at least 5% of the  limited  partners'  capital
contributions  less  distributions  to limited  partners and instead  permit the
General Partner to determine reasonable reserve requirements of the Partnership.
The vote was sought pursuant to a Consent  Solicitation  that expired on October
16, 2000 at which time the amendment  was approved by the  requisite  percent of
limited  partnership  interests.  Upon expiration of the consent period, a total
number of 110,551  units had voted of which  102,214 units had voted in favor of
the amendment, 6,832 voted against the amendment and 1,505 units abstained.

<PAGE>


ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a)    Exhibits:

                  Exhibit 27, Financial Data Schedule, is filed as an exhibit to
                  this report.

            b)    Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended September 30, 2000.




<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI


                                    By:   CONCAP EQUITIES, INC.
                                          General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Controller


                                    Date: