alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
22.810 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       (a) 						            When a contract is contemplated that will include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, the contracting officer shall insert-                                                         (1) 								                The clause at 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities, in the solicitation and contract; and                                                            (2) 								                The provision at 52.222-22, Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports, in the solicitation.                                                                             (b) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.222-23, Notice of Requirement for Affirmative Action to Ensure Equal Employment Opportunity for Construction, in solicitations for construction when a contract is contemplated that will include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, and the amount of the contract is expected to be in excess of $10,000.                                          (c) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.222-24, Preaward On-Site Equal Opportunity Compliance Evaluation, in solicitations other than those for construction when a contract is contemplated that will include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, and the amount of the contract is expected be $10 million or more.                                          (d) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.222-25, Affirmative Action Compliance, in solicitations, other than those for construction, when a contract is contemplated that will include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.                                          (e) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, in solicitations and contracts (see 22.802) unless the contract is exempt from all of the requirements of E.O.11246 (see 22.807(a)). If the contract is exempt from one or more, but not all, of the requirements of E.O.11246, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its Alternate I.                                          (f) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.222-27, Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction, in solicitations and contracts for construction that will include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, when the amount of the contract is expected to be in excess of $10,000.                                          (g) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.222-29, Notification of Visa Denial, in contracts that will include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, if the contractor is required to perform in or on behalf of a foreign country.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 22.8 - Equal Employment Opportunity
19.1402 Applicability.       The procedures in this subpart apply to all Federal agencies that employ one or more contracting officers.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 19.14 - Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105 - 2498

**ME MORA**  **NDUM** SUBJECT: Heavy- Duty Hy brid Onboard Diagnostics FROM: Am y Kopin TO: The Docket DATE: July

19 , 2011 

### On June 9 th, 2011 we held a conference call with Allison to discuss concerns raised by Allison regarding heavy - duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. Specifically , they have requested a delay

of the application of HD OBD requirements for hy brid applications until 2020. C oncerns were raised during the comment period for the heavy - duty greenhouse gas notice of p roposed rulemaking that heavy- duty hy brid applications may

not be able to meet the 2013 heavy - duty

OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking . 1 , 2 

### Attendees from the EPA and Allison are shown in the table below.

**Attendee Affil**  **iation** Cleophas Jackson EPA Anthony Neam EPA Amy Kopin EPA Barb Chance Allison Kevin Rodgers Allison

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heavy - Duty Engines and Vehicles,” r epublished December 29, 2010. Available here: http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR - 2010 - 12 - 29/html/2010 - 32726.htm 2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule Regulations Requiring Onboard Dia gnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy - Duty Engines Used in Highway Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy - Duty Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds ,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd - obd - frm - 02 - 24 - 09 - notice - 74 - fr - 8310.pdf OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
#### § 29.3550 Stemmed.

A form of tobacco, including strips and strip scrap, from which the stems or midribs have been removed.

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LEDAWN GIBSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:19cv512-MW/MAF

FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY

BOARD OF TRUSTEES,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

The Mediator has filed his Mediation Report, indicating that “[a]ll issues have 

been resolved.” ECF No. 54. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The parties must comply with their settlement agreement.

2. All claims other than for enforcement of the settlement agreement are 

voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.

3. Jurisdiction is retained to enforce the order to comply with the settlement 

agreement.

4. The Clerk must enter judgment stating, “The parties are ordered to comply 

with their settlement agreement. The court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the order 

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-MAF Document 55 Filed 11/10/20 Page 1 of 2
2

to comply with the settlement agreement. All claims in this case are voluntarily 

dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.” 

5. The trial scheduled for May 17, 2021 is cancelled and all deadlines 

associated with the trial are cancelled. 

6. The Clerk must close the file.

7. A party who objects to the terms of this order or the judgment to be entered 

based on this order must file a timely motion to alter or amend under Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 59(e).

SO ORDERED on November 10, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-MAF Document 55 Filed 11/10/20 Page 2 of 2
#### Shirley Tieppo, Respondent, v Earl Tieppo, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: At oral argument the parties agreed, as they did at Special Term, that the child support provision in issue should be construed in the light of the separation agreement and the subsequent modifying stipulation and without parol evidence. Accordingly, we deem any request in the briefs for a remand for additional testimony to have been abandoned. We agree with the conclusion reached in Special Term’s decision as to the intended meaning of the provision. (Appeal from order of Monroe *979Supreme Court — support.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Moule, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to their knowledge:

(1)          this periodic report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced BioEnergy, LLC.

Dated:  August 14, 2007
|        | * * | */s/Revis L. Stephenson III* |
|--------|----------|------------------------------|
|   |     | Revis L. Stephenson III      |
|   |     | Chief Executive Officer      |
|   |     |                         |
|   |     |                         |
|   | * * | */s/ Richard Peterson*       |
|   |     | Richard Peterson             |
|   |     | Chief Financial Officer      |

 

----
§ 3800.3 Functions. The WAOB has four major areas of responsibility: ( a ) *Agricultural outlook and situation.* ( 1 ) Coordinate and review all crop and commodity data used to develop outlook and situation material within the Department of Agriculture.
( 2 ) Oversee and clear for consistency of analytical assumptions and results, all estimates and analyses which significantly relate to international and domestic commodity supply and demand. This includes such estimates and analyses prepared for public distribution by the Foreign Agricultural Service, the Economic Research Service, or by any other agency or office of the Department.
( 3 ) Participate in planning and developing research programs relating to improving the Department's forecasting and estimating capabilities.
( 4 ) Provide liaison between the Department and Commodity Futures Trading Commission to assure that the futures market serves the best interest of agriculture and the public.
( 5 ) Plan and participate in Departmental, interdepartmental, regional and international outlook conferences and briefings, to maintain an awareness of current and upcoming economic issues significant to the food and agricultural system.
( b ) *Interagency commodity estimates.* ( 1 ) Establish Interagency Commodity Estimates Committees to bring together estimates and analyses from supporting agencies and to develop official estimates of supply, utilization, and prices for commodities.
( 2 ) Review for consistency of analytical assumptions and results, all proposed decisions made by the Interagency Commodity Estimates Committee prior to any release outside the Department.
( c ) *Weather and climate.* ( 1 ) Serve as a focal point within the Department for coordination of weather, climate, and related crop monitoring activities.
[53 FR 5358, Feb. 24, 1988, as amended at 79 FR 44117, July 30, 2014]
Order entered December 12, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00209-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.E.M., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-12693-V

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 6, 2016 motion for extension of time to file 

appellant’s brief and request for assistance in obtaining findings of fact and conclusions of law. 

We GRANT appellant’s motion for extension to the extent that appellant’s brief shall be 

filed by December 30, 2016. 

We DENY appellant’s request for assistance in obtaining findings of fact and conclusions 

of law because the record shows appellant’s notice of past due findings of fact and conclusions 

of law was untimely. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 297.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Subpart 4.19 - Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems    **Parent topic:** Part 4 - Administrative and Information Matters4.1901 Definitions.       As used in this subpart–                                          *Covered contractor information system* means an information system that is owned or operated by a contractor that processes, stores, or transmits Federal contract information.                                          *Federal contract information* means information, not intended for public release, that is provided by or generated for the Government under a contract to develop or deliver a product or service to the Government, but not including information provided by the Government to the public (such as that on public Web sites) or simple transactional information, such as that necessary to process payments.                                          *Information* means any communication or representation of knowledge such as facts, data, or opinions in any medium or form, including textual, numerical, graphic, cartographic, narrative, or audiovisual (Committee on National Security Systems Instruction (CNSSI) 4009).                                          *Information system* means a discrete set of information resources organized for the collection, processing, maintenance, use, sharing, dissemination, or disposition of information (44 U.S.C. 3502).                                          *Safeguarding* means measures or controls that are prescribed to protect information systems.4.1902 Applicability.       This subpart applies to all acquisitions, including acquisitions of commercial products or commercial services other than commercially available off-the-shelf items, when a contractor's information system may contain Federal contract information.4.1903 Contract clause.       The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.204-21, Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems, in solicitations and contracts when the contractor or a subcontractor at any tier may have Federal contract information residing in or transiting through its information system.
#### Margit Andre, Respondent, v Stephen Andre, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Appellant and his wife were divorced in 1977 and he was ordered to pay $135 per week alimony, an additional sum for child support and certain costs in maintaining the marital home. At the time of the divorce, appellant was an engineer employed at Calspan Laboratories and earning approximately $33,000 per year. In 1978 he voluntarily resigned his position at Calspan and accepted a college teaching position at a substantially lower salary. He has moved to reduce the alimony payments based upon this change of circumstances. The court denied the application finding that appellant’s hardship was self-imposed for the purpose of avoiding his support obligations (see *Hickland v Hickland,*39 NY2d 1). The record contains ample evidence that although the change in employment may have been precipitous, it was made for valid occupational reasons. Appellant testified that he had received a change in his assignment at Calspan and that similar changes for his colleagues in the past had been the prelude to their discharge. He introduced convincing evidence that •the business of the corporation was declining, that its level of employment had severely contracted over the past few years and that there had been a recent change in ownership. Appellant’s proof thus established a substantial change in circumstances and overcame any inference from the facts that his conduct prevented a modification in the alimony required of him. Accordingly, the *975matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, so that it may review the record, accept such additional evidence as the parties wish to offer, make appropriate findings, and enter an order of modification. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court — modify alimony.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
§ 4280.39 Contents of an application. An application for a loan or a Grant must contain the following: ( a ) Required forms and certifications: ( 1 ) Standard Form 424, “Application for Federal Assistance,” signed by an authorized representative of the Intermediary.
( 2 ) A Resolution of the Board of Directors signed by the directors and certified by the Intermediary's board secretary. The board resolution must indicate whether the Intermediary is requesting a loan or Grant, agree to the provisions of this subpart and the loan or Grant agreement including the Intermediary's 20 percent Fund contribution, and state that the Intermediary has the legal authority to enter into a loan or Grant agreement under these Programs;
( 3 ) Form AD 1047, “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and other Responsibility Matters—Primary Covered Transactions,” and Form AD-1048, “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Transactions.”
( 4 ) Assurance statement for the Uniform Act signed by the Ultimate Recipient. This statement provides Rural Development with the required assurance statement that any relocations of persons or acquisitions of real property, as part of completing the Ultimate Recipient Project, will be handled in accordance with this statute.
( 5 ) RD Instruction 1940-Q, Exhibit A-1, applies if the loan is greater than $150,000 or the Grant is greater than $100,000;
( 6 ) SF LLL, “Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,” (if the Intermediary or the Ultimate Recipient engages in lobbying activities);
( 7 ) Form AD 1049, “Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace Requirements,” for Grants only;
( 8 ) Seismic certification if construction of a building is proposed. The Project owner certifies that any building constructed will comply with standards that reduce the damage caused by earthquakes;
( 9 ) Environmental documentation in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970.
( 10 ) RUS Form 7, “Financial and Statistical Report” and RUS Form 7a “Investments, Loan Guarantees, and Loans,” or similar information.
( b ) A written narrative section must be provided. This section consists of the following: ( 1 ) A Project description, including details of the work to be performed with Rural Development funds, and a business plan, including a discussion of management and prior experience of the Ultimate Recipient.
( 2 ) A discussion of how the Project meets each selection factor in § 4280.42(b).
( 3 ) A Revolving Loan Fund Plan is required if the Intermediary is applying for a Grant to establish a Revolving Loan Fund.
[72 FR 29843, May 30, 2007, as amended at 81 FR 11052, Mar. 2, 2016]
#### In the Matter of Phil Jiminez, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[815 NYS2d 342]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

During a search of petitioner’s cell, various items were recovered including two journals from the law library, sheets of paper with inmate names, commissary items and dollar amounts and an inmate change sheet. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing authorized items in an unauthorized area, stealing state property, possessing gambling paraphernalia and receiving compensation for legal work. At the subsequent tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner pleaded guilty, with explanation, to possessing authorized items in an unauthorized area and was found guilty of the remaining charges except for the charge of possessing gambling paraphernalia. The determination was upheld on administrative appeal, resulting in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Initially, inasmuch as petitioner pleaded guilty to possessing authorized items in an unauthorized area, he is precluded from challenging the sufficiency of the evidence underlying this charge *(see Matter of Cannon v Artus,*18 AD3d 993, 994 [2005]). The misbehavior report, documentary evidence and testimony *1247presented at the hearing establish that petitioner impermissibly possessed state property in his cell and constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination finding him guilty of stealing *(see Matter of O’Connor v Selsky,*24 AD3d 841 [2005]). On the other hand, the Attorney General concedes and we agree that the evidence presented does not support the determination finding petitioner guilty of receiving compensation for legal work, as the author of the misbehavior report stated that he was unsure whether the list of inmate names and items was for gambling or payment for legal services. Consequently, that part of the determination must be annulled and all references thereto expunged from petitioner’s institutional record.* Finally, we find no merit to petitioner’s assertion that he was denied the right to present witnesses, as the record indicates that their testimony would have been redundant to other testimony presented *(see Matter of Seymour v Goord,*24 AD3d 831, 832 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 711 [2006]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of receiving compensation for legal work; petition granted to that extent and the Commissioner of Correctional Services is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner’s institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed.

*

 Remittal for a redetermination of the penalty is unnecessary as no loss of good time was imposed and petitioner has already served the penalty *(see Matter of Taylor v Katz,*16 AD3d 741, 741 [2005]).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

EMANUEL BELL, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-152-AW-GRJ

COREY SHORT, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF 

No. 13), to which no objections have been filed. I agree with the magistrate judge’s 

conclusions, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated into 

this order. The clerk will enter a judgment that says “This case is dismissed for 

failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute.” The clerk will then 

close the file.

SO ORDERED on January 14, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00152-AW-GRJ Document 14 Filed 01/14/21 Page 1 of 1