# Patent

## Title
Optical glass suitable for mold forming

## Abstract

An optical glass suitable for mold forming having a metal composition in wt % in terms of metal oxides calculated from the composition of the following components: P2O5 34–50%, Li2O 2–9%, Na2O 7–28%, K2O 3–27%, provided that the total of R2O is 17–41% (R: Li, Na, K), Al2O3 6.5–30%, ZnO 0–22%, BaO 0–21%, SrO 0–18%, CaO 0–16%, MgO 0–14%, provided that the total of R′O is 0–34% (R′: Zn, Ba, Sr, Ca, Mg), ZrO2 0–1.5% and F 1.5–32% relative to the total weight of the oxides, and exhibits a glass transition temperature (Tg) of 350° C. or lower and a specific gravity (Sg) of 3.1 or less and is excellent in chemical durability. The optical glass can be press formed at a low temperature of about 270 to 400° C.

## Background
FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
This invention relates to an optical glass for molding, in particular, an optical glass for a precision molding lens capable of carrying out molding at most 400° C., having a glass transformation temperature (Tg) of at most 350° C. and specific gravity (Sg) of at most 3.1.
BACKGROUND TECHNIQUE 
Of late, aspheric lenses or micro optical lenses used in the optical lens system have often been produced by a molding technique using a high precision die without polishing. However, the quality of a die suitable for molding is subject to various limitations from the respect of workability, durability and mass productivity. This indicates that the property of a glass to be molded is also limited. The most important property limited is a softening temperature. Molding of a glass having a softening temperature of 600 to 700° C. or higher, for example, has a large influence upon the life of a die and thus results in lowering of the mass productivity of lenses. Accordingly, it has been considered difficult from the standpoint of mass productivity to mold commercially available optical glasses of all kinds having been marketed and consequently, it becomes a subject of research to develop a glass excellent in moldability.
In JP-A-02-124743, for example, there is disclosed a low softening point, medium refractive index and low dispersion optical glass for precision molded lens, having a yielding point (At) of at most 500° C., refractive index (nd) of 1.53 to 1.62 and Abbe number (ν d) of 59.0 to 64.0, and comprising P2O5 and ZnO, as an essential element, and 28 to 49 weight % of ZnO+BaO+SrO+CaO+MgO. This optical glass has such a feature that grinding or polishing after molding is not required because of having a low yielding point (At) and excellent stability, chemical durability, as well as melting property.
JP-A-08-183632 and JP-A-11-139845 have made similar proposals, with which lowering of the softening temperature of the glass is a common subject.
Many of these glasses, however, have softening temperatures of about 400–500° C., since if lower than this temperature range, there arises a problem that chemical durability is lowered and no practical glass is obtained. When the composition of such a glass is so selected as to correspond to the optical properties of commercially available optical glasses, a sufficient softening temperature cannot be obtained sometimes.
Phosphate glasses having relatively a lower softening temperature of oxide glasses have hitherto been proposed as a low softening point glass, for example, as shown in JP-A-60-171244, JP-A-61-036136, JP-A-02-116642, JP-A-02-124743, JP-A-03-040934, JP-A-05-132339, JP-A-08-183632, JP-A-09-278479, JP-A-09-301735, etc.
The inventors have hitherto made efforts to develop a glass capable of being subjected to molding at a low temperature, i.e. at most 400° C., in particular, about 380° C. in the above described oxide glass compositions of phosphate type, and thus have found that it is possible to incorporate a considerable quantity of Al2O3 without increasing the quantity of P2O5 while increasing in essential manner the quantity of Li2O, Na2O and K2O, whereby the above described problems can be solved. The present patent application has thus been filed (JP-A-2003-026439).
It is well known that in general, addition of fluorine is effective for lowering the softening temperature of glass. However, fluorophosphate glasses up to the present time have often been used for the purpose of realizing the optical properties thereof such as low refractive index, low dispersion property, etc., as disclosed in JP-A-60-210545 or JP-A-63-144141.
Further, a glass described in JP-A-57-027941 is known as a low softening point glass (having a low glass transformation temperature). This fluorophosphate glass is a glass having a glass transformation temperature (Tg) of about 100° C., i.e. very low sortening point glass, but meets with low productivity because of containing a large amount of tin fluorides as a low boiling point compound, resulting in more vaporization during glass melting.
Thus, this glass is not considered suitable for mass production. The glass transformation temperature of about 100° C. is not considered practical as an optical glass.
The phosphate glass described in the former JP-A-02-116642 aims at a low softening point and can contain fluorine in an amount of up to 5%, but this glass does not have an object of positively adding fluorine to lower the softening point and the fluorine is only an additive component.
JP-B-59-033545 of Corning Co. (which will hereinafter be referred to as Corning Publication) discloses a low softenting point glass of fluorophosphate type for molding, having a glass transformation temperature (Tg) of at most about 350° C. This known invention is considered to be based on finding that when Al2O3 having hitherto been considered to markedly raise the glass transformation temperature (Tg) simultaneously contains fluorides in an amount of more than 3% of F as an analytical value, Tg of the glass is not markdely raised. And this publication states that it is important for obtaining a low softening point glass excellent in durability to maintain an atomic ratio of the analytical value of F: Al within a range of 0.75 to 5 and that even in Examples, the atomic ratio of F: Al is described. In Claims of the Corning Publication, there is shown % by weight on oxide basis, but this is determined by calculation, not from the component composition, but from the analytical value of the glass after melted.
In Tables 2 and 6 of the Corning Publication, there are shown residual ratios of F when melted under each condition, according to which it is apparent that there is a large dispersion over 9.11 to 69.5% and accordingly, the evaporation quantity of F is felt very large and not even. As one of factors thereof, it is considered that there is a high possibility of a reaction with a crucible. In the invention disclosed in the Corning Publication, there are used various crucibles, for example, a crucible of SiO2 type very reactive with F or Al2O3 affecting the durability thereof, resulting in one factor that the resulting glass composition is fluctuated. Furthermore, in Examples, raw materials containing water of crystallization causing vaporization of P2O5 or F are used.
As described above, the Corning Publication does not have a sufficient disclosure, since in Claims, the analytical values of F and a part of Al and the atomic ratios of F: Al are only described and no analytical values of P, Li, Na, K, etc., which are important for lowering the softening point of the glass and have a large influence upon durability, are described, in spite of that the melting conditions are not constant and the final glass composition considered to be largely affected thereby.
Optional components, PbO and CdO are useful as a component for not only raising the refractive index but also giving a low softening point as disclosed in JP-B-40-014301 and are also used in about half of Examples of the Corning Publication, because the other components for giving a low softening point, such as F, P, Li, Na, K, etc., can be reduced by the use of PbO and CdO, which are very effective for lowering the softening point while simultaneously improving the durability. However, PbO or CdO is so poisonous that the use thereof tends to be avoided lately from optical glasses in view of the standpoint of protecting the environmental pollution, and thus it is not preferred to use PbO or CdO.
In the glass composition of phosphate type of JP-A-2003-026439 having lately been filed, the inventors have found that a considerable amount of Al2O3 can be incorporated without increasing the amount of P2O5 while increasing the amounts of Li2O, Na2O and K2O components as essential components and thus reached an invention relating to a low softening point glass excellent in durability. The present invention is achieved by aiming at further lowering the softening point and improving the durability of the former glass composition and thus incorporating F, as an essential component, thereinto.
However, the present invention is considerably similar to the invention of the Corning Publication, as a whole, since the essential components of the glass composition of the former are same as those of the latter. The difference between the present invention and Corning Invention will now be illustrated:
In the Corning Publication, there are pointed out various problems as described in Prior Art. That is, claims thereof are represented by % by weight based on oxide basis, which is based on not a range calculated from the component composition but an analytical value of the glass obtained by melting, while on the other hand, the claims of the present invention are represented by % by weight based on oxide basis, calculated from the component compositions of Examples. That is, in the present invention, claims thereof are similarly represented by % by weight based on oxide basis, and accordingly, comparison of this with that described in the Corning Publication using the representation obtained from the analytical value of the glass is difficult. Since Examples show only the analytical values of F and Al and as described in Prior Art, have a number of problems relating to evaporation such as melting conditions, such a comparison is meaningless and in other words, the Corning Publication does not have a substantial disclosure of the composition of the present invention.
Thus, the comparison will now be carried out with % by weight based on oxide basis, calculated from the component compositions of Examples. In the present invention, furthermore, PbO, CdO, etc. capable of imparting a low softening point but having poisonous property being generally pointed out are not used from the standpoint of proofing the environmental pollution, so the comparison is concerned with the compositons of Examples free from PbO, CdO, etc.
In Table 1 are shown the composition ranges of weight percents on oxide basis, calculated from Examples of the present invention and Corning Publication. In claims of the Corning Publication, the composition comprises 30 to 75 wt % of P2O5, 3 to 25 wt % of R2O, 3 to 20 wt % of Al2O3, more than 3 wt % to less than 24 wt % of F and 0.75 to 5 of F: Al. Accordingly, it is understood therefrom that this composition is largely different from the real composition range calculated from Examples.
It is apparent from Table 1 that in the present invention, the range of P2O5 is less than the lower limit of the Corning Publication, the range of R2O (R: Li, Na, K) is considerably more than the upper limit of the Corning Publication and Li2O, Na2O and K2O are all contained as essential components. The upper limit of Al2O3 is considerably more than that of the Corning Publication, although partly overlapped in composition.
This is results of finding according to the present invention that a considerable amount of Al2O3 can be incorporated without increasing the amount of P2O5 while increasing the amounts of Li2O, Na2O and K2O as essential components, and further lowering of the softening point and improvement of the durability can be realized by incorporating F as an essential component.
As described above, it is apparent that the present invention is different in composition from the invention described in the Corning Publication.
Accordingly, it is the first object of the present invention is to provide an optical glass for molding, in particular, being excellent in workability and chemical durability, and capable of being subjected to precise molding at a low temperature of, e.g., at most 400° C. and having a low transformation temperature (Tg) of at most 350° C. and a specific gravity (Sg) of at most 3.1.
It is the second object of the present invention is to provide with an excellent producibility, an optical glass having optical properties, i.e. refractive index (nd) of 1.43 to 1.55 and Abbe number (ν d) of 55 to 85.
DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION 
(1) An optical glass for molding, being excellent in chemical durability and having a transformation temperature (Tg) of at most 350° C. and a specific gravity (Sg) of at most 3.1, which is represented, in term of elements for making up the glass, by the following chemical composition (wt % on oxide basis, calculated from the component composition):

















P2O5
 34 to 50%,




Li2O
  2 to 9%,



Na2O
  7 to 28%,



K2O
  3 to 27%,



Sum of R2O
 17 to 41%
(R: Li, Na, K),



Al2O3
6.5 to 30%,



ZnO
  0 to 22%,



BaO
  0 to 21%,



SrO
  0 to 18%,



CaO
  0 to 16%,



MgO
  0 to 14%,



Sum of R′O
  0 to 34%
(R′: Zn, Ba, Sr, Ca, Mg),



ZrO2
  0 to 1.5% and



F
1.5 to 32%










(2) An optical glass for molding, being excellent in chemical durability and having a transformation temperature (Tg) of at most 300° C. and a specific gravity (Sg) of at most 3.1, which is represented, in term of elements for making up the glass, by the following chemical composition (wt % on oxide basis, calculated from the component composition):
Preferred Embodiment

















P2O5
 39 to 47%,




Li2O
  6 to 9%,



Na2O
  7 to 15%,



K2O
  3 to 5%,



Sum of R2O
 17 to 26%
(R: Li, Na, K),



Al2O3
8.5 to 22%,



ZnO
  0 to 17%,



BaO
  0 to 17%,



SrO
  0 to 12%,



CaO
  0 to 10%,



MgO
  0 to 5%,



Sum of R′O
  0 to 32%
(R′: Zn, Ba, Sr, Ca, Mg) and



F
12 to 27%










The composition ranges of the basic application (Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-332531, WO 03/037813 A1) of the present invention is represented by mol % and claims of the present PCT application are represented by weight % on oxide basis, which are different but any of which are based on the component composition (wt %) in Examples.
Example 1 of the basic application will be illustrated.
For conversion of the representation of the component composition (mol %) in [Table 1] of the basic application into that by weight % on oxide basis, it is first returned to the component composition in [Table 6]. In this method, the mol % value of each component is multiplied by the molecular weight to give a sum total to be a denominator. Namely, the denominator will be 28.79×141.95+12.16×29.88+20.52×61.98+9.64×94.20+27.04×83.98+1.11×81.39+0.74×123.22=9082.34.
Then, the mol % value of each component is multiplied by the molecular weight to give a value to be a numerator, which is divided by the above described denominator and multiplied by 100 to give a component composition (wt %).
In the case of P2O5, for example, it will be:

    
    
        {(28.79×141.95)÷9082.34}×100=45 (wt %)
        Cf. [Table 6] in Basic Application.
    
    


As to the other components, the similar calculation is carried out. As such, all the components are subjected to the calculation to obtain wt % re-presentation shown in [Table 6] of the basic application.
Then, the component composition (wt %) is converted into a wt % re-presentation on oxide basis. In this method, the fluoride component in the component composition (wt %) is divided into cation and anion (F). For example, the fluoride used in Example 1 is only AlF3: 25 wt %, which is divided into Al and F.
Since the molecular weight of AlF3 is 83.98, the atomic weight of Al is 26.98 and the atomic weight of F is 19.00, the amount of Al in AlF3: 25 wt % is 25×(26.98+83.98)=8.03 wt % (atomic wt %) and the amount of F in AlF3: 25 wt % is 25×{(19.00×3)÷83.98}=16.97 wt % (atomic wt %). This means that the proportion of Al in the component composition (wt %) is 8.03 wt % and that of F is 16.97 wt %, that is, 8.03 g of Al and 16.97 g of F are present in 100 g.
Then, if Al: 8.03 wt % in AlF3 is all oxides, the amount of Al2O3 is to be obtained. Since the molecular weight of Al2O3 is 101.96, 2Al of which corresponds to 8.03 wt %, the amount of Al2O3 is 8.03+{(2×26.98)÷101.96}=15.17. (This teaches that when the Al component in AlF3: 25 g is all oxides, Al2O3 is 15.17 g.)
When in Table 6, calculation is carried out to be 100% as a whole by substituting AlF3: 25 with Al2O3: 15.17 in the component composition (wt %) of Example 1, the weight % representation on oxide basis of Example 1 in Table 7 of the present PCT application is given. In this case, the weight of F in 100 g weight is 16.97 g (Cf. Table 7, Example 1).
It is to be noted herein that conversion of from the component composition (mol % or wt %) to a weight % on oxide basis is possible but conversion of from the weight % representation on oxide basis to the component composition is not possible. (Since the weight % representation on oxide basis shows only the weight proportion of cation, it is not clear which cation is used for the fluoride only by this information and specification of the fluoride is impossible.)
Therefore, it is understood that representation of only the weight % on oxide basis does not disclose or teach the component composition.


BEST EMBODIMENT FOR CARRYING OUT INVENTION 
The low softening point glass according to the present invention is a glass of phosphate type which can mainly be used for optical uses and pre-dominantly comprises P2O5—Al2O3—R2O—F (R: Li, Na, K), and in particular, at least 6.5% of Al2O3 is incorporated as a durability improving component, with success, whereby to impart an excellent chemical durability and stability which is represented by a weight loss of at most 0.3 weight % , preferably at most 0.05 weight % in a durability test. This glass has a glass transformation temperature (Tg) of 230 to 350° C., molding temperature of 270 to 400° C. and optical characteristic values i.e. refractive index (nd) at d-line of 1.43 to 1.55 and Abbe number (ν d) of 55 to 85.
In a Chemical Durability Test employed herein, a glass sample (1.5×1.5×1.0 cm) is treated in boiled distilled water for 2 hours and during the same time, a weight loss is measured and represented by percent to the initial weight.
The reasons for limiting the composition range ( % should be taken as those by weight % on oxide basis unless otherwise indicated) of each component of this low softening point, optical glass according to the present invention to the above described (1) are as follows:
P2O5 is a glass forming component, which is present in a proportion of 34 to 50%, since if less than 34%, glass formation is difficult, while if more than 50%, the durability is lowered. The preferred range is 39 to 47%.
Li2O is a component for improving the melting property of the glass and for lowering the softening temperature of the glass. If the proportion thereof is less than 2%, the above described effect is not sufficient, while if more than 9%, the durability and stability are deteriorated. The preferred range is 6 to 9%.
Na2O is a component for improving the melting property of the glass and for lowering the softening temperature, similar to Li2O. If the proportion thereof is less than 7%, the above described effect is not sufficient, while if more than 28%, the stability and durability are deteriorated. The preferred range is 7 to 15%.
K2O is a component for improving the melting property of the glass and for lowering the softening temperature of the glass, not so as alkaline components (Li2O, Na2O). If the proportion thereof is less than 3%, the above described effect is not sufficient, while if more than 27%, the durability particularly is deteriorated. The preferred range is 3 to 5%.
The sum of Li2O, Na2O and K2O is 17 to 41%. If the proportion thereof is less than 17%, the effect of improving the melting property of the glass and for lowering the softening temperature is not sufficient, while if more than 41%, the stability and durability are deteriorated. The preferred range is 17 to 26%.
Al2O3 has an effect of improving the durability. If the proportion is less than 6.5%, the effect thereof is not sufficient and if more than 30%, the melting property of the glass is deteriorated. The preferred range is 8.5 to 22%.
ZnO is a component for improving the melting property of the glass. If the proportion exceeds 22%, the stability is deteriorated. The preferred range is 0 to 17%.
BaO is a component for improving the melting property of the glass. If the proportion exceeds 21%, the stability is deteriorated. The preferred range is 0 to 17%.
SrO is a component for improving the melting property of the glass. If the proportion exceeds 18%, the stability is deteriorated. The preferred range is 0 to 12%.
CaO is a component for improving the melting property of the glass. If the proportion exceeds 16%, the stability is deteriorated. The preferred range is 0 to 10%.
MgO is a component for improving the melting property of the glass. If the proportion exceeds 14%, the stability is deteriorated. The preferred range is 0 to 5%.
The sum of ZnO, BaO, SrO, CaO and MgO (R′O) should be 0 to 34%, since if exceeding 34%, the stability is deteriorated. The preferred range is 0 to 32%.
ZrO2 is a component for improving the durability. If the proportion exceeds 1.5%, the melting property of the glass is deteriorated.
F is a component for improving the melting property of the glass and for lowering the softening temperature of the glass. If the proportion thereof is less than 1.5%, the above described effect is not sufficient, while if more than 32%, vaporization and others are caused, resulting in difficulty of preparing the glass. The preferred range is 12 to 27%.
Production of the low softening point optical glass according to the present invention is carried out by a conventional glass production process, using as a raw material, ordinary glass raw materials such as salts such as metaphosphates, sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate, aluminum fluoride, sodium fluoride, etc. A transparent glass can be prepared by adequately melting these raw materials in a platinum crucible at a temperature of about 800 to 1100° C. and then casting the resulting adequately melted glass melt in a mold made of carbon, etc., thus obtaining a transparent glass. Then, the resulting glass is subjected to annealing at about glass transformation temperature, thus obtaining a thermally stable glass.
In these glasses, the glass transformation temperature is low, for example, about 230 to 350° C. and molding is carried out at about 270 to 400° C. The chemical durability thereof can be represented by a weight loss in distilled water in a range of at most 0.30%, which does not constitute any problem on practical use.
The following examples and comparative examples are given in order to illustrate the low softening point glass of present invention in detail without limiting the same.
EXAMPLES 1 TO 45 
Using the corresponding metaphosphates, oxides, fluorides, carbonates, nitrates, etc., as a raw material of each component, the component compositions were mixed as shown in Tables 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. These materials were weighed to give 100 g as a glass weight, adequately mixed, then charged in a platinum crucible, covered, melted for several hours in an electric furnace at a temperature of 800 to 1100° C., homogenized and refined by stirring and then poured into a metallic mold, followed by gradually cooling, to obtain a clear and homogeneous glass.
In Tables 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 are shown compositions obtained by converting the component compositions of Tables 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 into weight % on oxide basis.
In Tables 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 are shown the thermal properties (glass transformation temperature (Tg), yielding point (At), thermal expansion coefficient (α) at 50–250° C.) and optical properties (refractive index (nd), Abbe number (ν d)), specific gravity (Sg) and data of the Chemical Durability Test of the resulting glasses. In the Chemical Durability Test employed herein, a glass sample (1.5×1.5×1.0 cm) was treated in boiled distilled water for 2 hours, during which a weight loss was measured and represented by percent to the initial weight.
In the composition of Example 43, the raw materials were mixed so as to give a glass weight of 30 g, melted at 900° C. for 30 minutes in an analogous manner to Comparative Example 1 and then the glass weight was measured to obtain a weight loss.
Thus, the weight loss of about 1.4% was confirmed. In Comparative Example 1, the weight loss reaches 15.9% by only fluorine this indicates that vaporization was suppressed in Example 43.
In the composition of Example 41, the raw materials were mixed so as to give a glass weight of 600 g and melted at 1000° C. for 2 hours. The melting was carried out in a similar manner three times to examine change of the refractive index and consequently it was found that the refractive index difference by nd was well in agreement with 0.00014.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1 
Example 19 of the Corning Publication was employed as Comparative Example 1. The batch composition is shown in Table 6 and the weight % composition of oxide basis obtained from the batch composition is shown in Table 11. In Table 16, there are shown the main properties and analytical values shown in Table 2 of the Corning Publication.










TABLE 1









Composition Range












Oxide

JP-B-59-033545



Basis

Composition free



(wt %)
Present Invention
from CdO, PbO







P2O5
34.58 to 49.9 
50.71 to 79.89



Li2O
2.64 to 8.41
  0 to 5.54



Na2O
 7.34 to 27.24
  0 to 7.52



K2O
 3.24 to 26.53
   0 to 12.24



R2O
17.86 to 40.71
 9.36 to 16.04



Al2O3
 6.55 to 29.66
 3.99 to 10.99



ZnO
  0 to 21.4
   0 to 24.83



BaO
   0 to 20.21
   0 to 34.20



SrO
   0 to 17.02
   0 to 26.09



CaO
   0 to 15.15
   0 to 18.53



MgO
   0 to 13.57
 0 to 14



CdO
—
—



PbO
—
—



ZrO2
  0 to 1.19
—



F
 1.81 to 31.99
10.06 to 42.45



F/Al
0.37 to 7.00
 3.63 to 14.07



















TABLE 2









Examples

















wt %
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10




















P2O5
45
37
29
45
45
40
40
40
40
40


Li2O
4
4
4
4

4
4
4
4


LiF




10




4


Na2O
14
14
14
14
14

14

24


NaF





24

24

24


K2O
10
10
10
10
10
10

10
10


KF






20


10


Al2O3




9
15
10
22
5
15


AlF3
25
33
41
17
1
7
12

17
7


ZnO
1
1
1
1
5


ZnF2


BaO




6


BaF2



8


SrO


SrF2


CaO


CaF2


MgO


MgF2


ZrO2
1
1
1
1








Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100


















TABLE 3









Examples

















wt %
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20




















P2O5
30
40
40
45
45
45
45
45
40
40


Li2O

4
4
4
3
3
3
8
4
4


LiF
4


Na2O

14
14

7
7
25


NaF
24
10

24
25


14
21
18


K2O

10
10
10
5
5
5
10
10
10


KF
10




25


Al2O3
10
5

10
15
15
17
20
15
13


AlF3
22
17
17
7


5
3


ZnO








10


ZnF2


BaO









15


BaF2


15


SrO


SrF2


CaO


CaF2


MgO


MgF2


ZrO2












Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100


















TABLE 4









Examples

















wt %
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30




















P2O5
45
45
45
40
43
45
40
44
44
46


Li2O
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5.5
5
6


LiF






2


Na2O
14
14
14
15

9
10


NaF




13
4
5
10
10
10


K2O
8
6
6
8
6
5
7
5.5
6
5


KF


Al2O3




7
13
10
5
5
5


AlF3
25
25
21
22
10

12
10
10
13


ZnO







20

15


ZnF2




17

10

20


BaO





20


BaF2


SrO


10


SrF2


CaO

6


CaF2


MgO
4


11


MgF2


ZrO2












Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100


















TABLE 5









Examples

















wt %
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40




















P2O5
40
40
40
40
40
40
43
40
35
40


Li2O
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
5


LiF
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
2
2
2


Na2O
5
5
5
5
5
5
6


NaF
11
11
11
11
11
9
6
10
10
10


K2O
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
3
3
3


KF


Al2O3





5
10


AlF3
22
24
16
24
16
13

25
13
25


ZnO







10
10
10


ZnF2


BaO


BaF2






21

5


SrO








5


SrF2



10
18



5
5


CaO







5
3


CaF2

10
18


MgO








2


MgF2
12




18


2


ZrO2












Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100




















TABLE 6









Examples

Comparative














wt %
41
42
43
44
45
wt %
Example 1

















P2O5
35
35
40
40
35
Al(PO3)3
44.7


Li2O
5
5
5
5
5
KPF6
29


LiF
2
2
2
2
2
NaPF6
26.3


Na2O



5
5


NaF
10
10
10
10
10


K2O
3
3
3
3
3


KF


Al2O3


AlF3
15
15
10
25
30


ZnO
5
5
15


ZnF2


BaO
10
5


BaF2
5


SrO

5
10
5
5


SrF2
5


CaO
5
5
5
5
5


CaF2

5


MgO


MgF2

5


ZrO2









Total
100
100
100
100
100
Total
100

















TABLE 7







Oxide



Basis
Examples

















wt %
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10




















P2O5
49.90
42.52
34.58
48.74
47.18
43.97
43.71
42.69
42.87
45.78


Li2O
4.44
4.60
4.77
4.34
6.05
4.40
4.37
4.27
4.29
2.64


Na2O
15.53
16.09
16.69
15.17
14.69
19.47
15.30
18.90
25.71
20.27


K2O
11.09
11.49
11.92
10.83
10.48
10.99
17.72
10.67
10.71
9.28


Al2O3
16.83
23.01
29.66
11.18
10.06
21.16
18.89
23.47
16.42
22.03


ZnO
1.10
1.14
1.19
1.08
5.25


BaO



7.58
6.29


SrO


CaO


MgO


ZrO2
1.11
1.15
1.19
1.08


Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100


Weight of
16.97
22.40
27.83
13.27
8.00
15.61
14.68
10.86
11.54
21.81


F in 100 g


(g)

















TABLE 8







Oxide



Basis
Examples

















wt %
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20




















P2O5
36.81
44.10
43.75
49.47
48.16
47.24
45.91
47.28
42.33
41.98


Li2O
2.83
4.41
4.38
4.40
3.20
3.14
3.05
8.41
4.24
4.20


Na2O
21.74
23.57
15.32
19.47
27.24
7.34
25.51
10.86
16.40
13.95


K2O
9.95
11.02
10.93
10.99
5.35
26.53
5.10
10.51
10.58
10.49


Al2O3
28.67
16.89
11.28
15.66
16.06
15.75
20.43
22.93
15.88
13.64


ZnO








10.58


BaO


14.35






15.74


SrO


CaO


MgO


ZrO2



Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100


Weight of
31.99
16.06
14.79
15.61
11.31
8.18
3.39
8.37
9.50
8.14


F in 100 g


(g)

















TABLE 9







Oxide



Basis
Examples

















wt %
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30




















P2O5
49.90
49.90
49.04
43.79
48.29
45.48
43.96
47.07
49.32
49.86


Li2O
4.44
4.44
4.36
4.38
4.50
4.05
5.65
5.90
5.60
6.51


Na2O
15.53
15.53
15.26
16.42
10.78
12.08
15.05
7.90
8.28
8.00


K2O
8.87
6.65
6.54
8.75
6.74
5.05
7.69
5.89
6.73
5.42


Al2O3
16.83
16.82
13.90
14.62
14.68
13.14
19.00
11.85
12.41
13.96


ZnO




15.02

8.64
21.40
17.65
16.25


BaO





20.21


SrO


10.90


CaO

6.66


MgO
4.43


12.03


ZrO2



Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100


Weight of
16.97
16.97
14.25
14.93
18.92
1.81
15.55
11.31
18.66
13.35


F in 100 g


(g)

















TABLE 10







Oxide



Basis
Examples

















wt %
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40




















P2O5
47.73
47.38
46.88
46.78
45.85
46.65
45.90
46.14
39.21
46.60


Li2O
6.65
6.60
6.53
6.52
6.39
6.50
7.35
7.10
6.90
7.17


Na2O
15.65
15.53
15.37
15.34
15.03
13.58
11.14
8.52
8.28
8.61


K2O
4.77
4.74
4.69
4.68
4.58
4.66
5.34
3.46
3.36
3.49


Al2O3
15.94
17.25
11.38
17.04
11.13
15.03
10.67
17.50
8.85
17.68


ZnO







11.53
11.20
11.64


BaO






19.60

4.91


SrO



9.65
17.02



10.23
4.81


CaO

8.50
15.15




5.76
3.36


MgO
9.26




13.57


3.70


ZrO2



Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100


Weight of
27.96
26.87
25.33
25.02
22.01
24.61
10.93
22.96
18.63
24.47


F in 100 g


(g)

















TABLE 11







Oxide
Oxide










Basis
Examples
Basis
Comparative














wt %
41
42
43
44
45
wt %
Example 1

















P2O5
39.25
40.00
43.20
46.14
41.29
P2O5
73.62


Li2O
6.91
7.04
6.65
7.10
7.27
Na2O
6.12


Na2O
8.29
8.45
7.98
14.27
14.60
K2O
9.36


K2O
3.37
3.43
3.24
3.46
3.54
Al2O3
10.89


Al2O3
10.22
10.41
6.55
17.50
21.50


ZnO
5.61
5.72
16.19


BaO
16.12
5.72


SrO
4.63
5.72
10.80
5.77
5.90


CaO
5.60
9.82
5.39
5.76
5.90


MgO

3.70


ZrO2









Total
100
100
100
100
100
Total
100


Weight of F
18.77
21.65
12.78
22.96
26.35
Weight of F
36


in 100 g





in 100 g


(g)





(g)


















TABLE 12









Examples


















1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10





















Tg (° C.)
308
329
348
276
299
332
316
326
287
336


At (° C.)
342
366
374
309
331
358
342
354
317
372


α50–250° C.
195
193
185
218
192
188
197
180
219
193


(×10−7° C.−1)


Loss Ratio (%)
0.009
0.004
0.092
0.164
0.097
0.009
0.031
0.027
0.023
0.007


Specific Gravity (Sg.)
2.71
2.77
2.83
2.82
2.8
2.75
2.71
2.7
2.68
2.75


nd
1.47779
1.46673
1.45547
1.48671
1.51066
1.48492
1.48087
1.49223
1.48078
1.46389


nF − nC
0.00652
0.00614
0.0057
0.00684
0.00761
0.00664
0.00659
0.00705
0.00693
0.00609


νd
73.3
76
79.9
71.2
67.1
73
73
69.8
69.4
76.2


F/Al Ratio
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.45
2.24
2.18
2.28
1.33
2.02
3.04


















TABLE 13









Examples


















11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20





















Tg (° C.)
316
298
269
316
328
322
317
340
320
319


At (° C.)
352
327
299
350
354
351
351
365
344
356


α50–250° C.
209
223
228
203
201
196
191
163
185
174


(×10−7° C.−1)


Loss Ratio (%)
0.025
0.079
0.086
0.03
0.008
0.046
0.032
0.003
0.007
0.008


Specific Gravity (Sg.)
2.78
2.71
2.86
2.69
2.71
2.65
2.62
2.67
2.83
2.94


nd
1.43269
1.4716
1.48095
1.47931
1.48658
1.49151
1.49904
1.50916
1.50624
1.5148


nF − nC
0.00526
0.0065
0.00669
0.00659
0.00694
0.00691
0.00766
0.0073
0.00756
0.00753


νd
82.3
72.6
71.9
72.7
70.1
71.1
65.1
69.7
67
68.4


F/Al Ratio
3.68
2.81
3.85
2.94
2.02
1.46
0.45
1.03
1.70
1.68


















TABLE 14









Examples


















21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30





















Tg (° C.)
329
317
305
350
287
350
339
326
277
324


At (° C.)
368
358
343
385
323
386
369
354
306
360


α50–250° C.
182
181
192
170
184
164
171
153
185
155


(×10−7° C.−1)


Loss Ratio (%)
0.007
0.007
0.01
0.037
0.022
0.005
0
0.004
0.042
0.006


Specific Gravity (Sg.)
2.72
2.74
2.82
2.78
2.85
3
2.85
2.98
2.87
2.9


nd
1.47722
1.4827
1.48796
1.48998
1.4824
1.54259
1.49691
1.52052
1.48903
1.51049


nF − nC
0.0062
0.00648
0.00879
0.00677
0.00678
0.00816
0.00702
0.00831
0.00697
0.00733


νd
77
74.5
55.5
72.4
71.2
66.5
70.8
62.6
70.2
69.6


F/Al Ratio
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.88
0.37
2.41
2.74
4.52
2.78


















TABLE 15









Examples


















31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40





















Tg (° C.)
292
254
237
255
234
326
318
295
274
284


At (° C.)
318
287
264
285
261
364
350
329
311
314


α50–250° C.
197
215
259
228
272
182
186
164
181
182


(×10−7° C.−1)


Loss Ratio (%)
0.062
0.27
0.22
0.19
0.27
0.045
0.012
0.008
0.007
0.02


Specific Gravity (Sg.)
2.71
2.71
2.7
2.79
2.84
2.76
2.97
2.87
2.98
2.9


nd
1.46083
1.45388
1.45974
1.45507
1.46283
1.46517
1.51682
1.48189
1.5034
1.47619


nF − nC
0.006
0.00574
0.00619
0.0059
0.00618
0.006
0.00739
0.00647
0.00711
0.00638


νd
76.8
79.1
74.3
77.1
74.9
77.5
69.9
74.5
70.8
74.6


F/Al Ratio
5.62
4.95
7.00
4.61
6.08
5.12
2.93
4.06
6.33
4.33



















TABLE 16









Examples
Comparative














41
42
43
44
45
Example 1

















Tg (° C.)
260
282
280
295
294
290


At (° C.)
294
316
317
331
331



α50–250° C.
197
185
175
182
190



(×10−7° C.−1)







Loss Ratio (%)
0.008
0.007
0.006
0.015
0.004



Specific Gravity (Sg.)
3.07
2.98
3.06
2.8
2.82



F Batch Weight





36


F Analytic Value





18.1


nd
1.49628
1.48993
1.52008
1.47162
1.46434
1.45


nF − nC
0.00682
0.00663
0.00763
0.00617
0.0059



νd
72.8
73.9
68.2
76.4
78.7



F/Al Ratio
5.53
6.38
5.65
4.06
3.88
11.13









Utility of Present Invention of Commercial Scale
As illustrated above, the inventors have tried to develop a glass of fluorophosphate type capable of being subjected to molding at a temperature of at most 400° C. and consequently have reached an epoch-making glass composition. According to the present invention, it is considered that a micro optical element can be molded with high producibility, which has hitherto been considered difficult. Furthermore, the optical glass of the present invention is so excellent in chemical durability that it is of high practical value.

## Claims

1. An optical glass for molding, being excellent in chemical durability and having a transformation temperature (Tg) of at most 350° C., a chemical durability represented by a weight loss in distilled water in a range of at most 0.30%, and a specific gravity (Sg) of at most 3.1, which is represented, in term of elements for making up the glass, by the following chemical composition (wt % on oxide basis, calculated from the component composition):

















P2O5
 39 to 47%,




Li2O
  2 to 9%,



Na2O
  7 to 28%,



K2O
  3 to 27%,



Sum of R2O
 17 to 41%
(R: Li, Na, K),



Al2O3
6.5 to 30%,



ZnO
  0 to 22%,



BaO
  0 to 17%,



SrO
  0 to 18%,



CaO
  0 to 16%,



MgO
  0 to 14%,



Sum of R′O
  0 to 34%
(R′: Zn, Ba, Sr, Ca, Mg),



ZrO2
  0 to 1.5% and



F
1.5 to 32%.