alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3565.302 Allowable fees. ( a ) *Lender fees.* The lender is authorized to charge reasonable and necessary fees in connection with a borrower's application for a guaranteed loan.
( b ) *Agency fees.* The Agency will charge one or more types of fees deemed appropriate as reimbursement for reasonable and necessary costs incurred in connection with applications received from lenders. Agency fees may include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) *Site assessment and market analysis or preliminary feasibility fee.* A fee for review of an application for a determination of preliminary feasibility.
( 2 ) *Application fee.* A fee submitted in conjunction with the application for a loan guarantee.
( 3 ) *Inspection fee.* A fee for inspection of the property in conjunction with a loan guarantee.
( 4 ) *Transfer fee.* A fee in connection with a request for approval of a transfer of physical assets or a change in the composition of the ownership entity.
( 5 ) *Extension or reopening fees.* A fee to extend the guarantee commitment or to reopen an application when a commitment has expired.
[63 FR 39458, July 22, 1998, as amended at 84 FR 55036, Oct. 15, 2019]
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 258 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2013 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to 

fraudulent representations about having received military 

decorations or medals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 258 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stolen Valor Act of 

3 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RECEIPT 

5 OF MILITARY DECORATIONS OR MEDALS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 704 of title 18, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘wears,’’; and 

9 (2) so that subsection (b) reads as follows: 

10 ‘‘(b) FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RE11 CEIPT OF MILITARY DECORATIONS OR MEDALS.—Who12 ever, with intent to obtain money, property, or other tan13 gible benefit, fraudulently holds oneself out to be a recipi14 ent of a decoration or medal described in subsection (c)(2) 

15 or (d) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more 

16 than one year, or both.’’. 

17 (b) ADDITION OF CERTAIN OTHER MEDALS.—Sec18 tion 704(d) of title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

19 (1) by striking ‘‘If a decoration’’ and inserting 

20 the following: 

21 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a decoration’’; 

22 (2) by inserting ‘‘a combat badge,’’ after ‘‘1129 

23 of title 10,’’; and 

24 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

25 ‘‘(2) COMBAT BADGE DEFINED.—In this sub26 section, the term ‘combat badge’ means a Combat 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 258 RDS

1 Infantryman’s Badge, Combat Action Badge, Com2 bat Medical Badge, Combat Action Ribbon, or Com3 bat Action Medal.’’. 

4 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 704 of title 

5 18, United States Code, is amended in each of subsections 

6 (c)(1) and (d) by striking ‘‘or (b)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Entremetrix Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George LeFevre, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)        Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Dated:           November 17, 2006 | /s/ George LeFevre            |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                               | By:  George LeFevre           |
|                               | Its:  Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Entremetrix Corporation and will be retained by Entremetrix Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 22.       List of Subsidiaries of NTN Canada, Inc.
                                          

Name of Subsidiary (1)                      Jurisdiction of Incorporation
----------------------                      -----------------------------

B.C. Learning Connection, Inc. (2).......................British Columbia
Magic Lantern Communications Ltd (3)...............................Canada
NTN Interactive Network Inc........................................Canada
1113659 Ontario Ltd. (4)..........................................Ontario
745695 Ontario Ltd. (5)...........................................Ontario
Sonoptic Technologies Inc. (6).....................................Canada

----------

(1)       Unless otherwise indicated, all named entities are wholly owned 
          subsidiaries of NTN Canada, Inc.
(2)       Wholly owned subsidiary of 745695 Ontario Ltd.
(3)       Wholly owned subsidiary of NTN Interactive Network Inc.
(4)       Partially owned (50%) subsidiary of Magic Lantern Communications Ltd.
(5)       Wholly owned subsidiary of Magic Lantern Communications Ltd.
(6)       Majority owned (75%) subsidiary of Magic Lantern Communications Ltd.

                                     - 110 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EPOLIN,
INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                          675,728
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   330,914
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     279,624
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,462,933
<PP&E>                          1,093,235
<DEPRECIATION>                  631,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,016,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           128,976
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        2,220,384
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,732,406
<SALES>                         1,681,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,681,243
<CGS>                           670,793
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   670,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                730,816
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 306,938
<INCOME-TAX>                    159,010
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             147,928
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    147,928
<EPS-BASIC>                   .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .01



</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Serdar
Kirmizioglu, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Gryphon
Resources Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1) The Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report.






/s/
Serdar Kirmizioglu


Serdar
Kirmizioglu


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer


January
13, 2009






A signed
original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2449 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2449

To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the age for receipt of 
military retired pay for nonregular service from 60 years of age to 55 
                             years of age.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 16 (legislative day, March 15), 2006

   Mr. Kerry (for himself, Mr. Dayton, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Johnson, Mr. 
 Lautenberg, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Menendez, and Mr. Reid) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the age for receipt of 
military retired pay for nonregular service from 60 years of age to 55 
                             years of age.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN AGE FOR RECEIPT OF MILITARY RETIRED PAY FOR 
              NONREGULAR SERVICE.

    (a) Reduction in Age.--Section 12731(a)(1) of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``at least 60 years of age'' and 
inserting ``at least 55 years of age''.
    (b) Application to Existing Provisions of Law or Policy.--With 
respect to any provision of law, or of any policy, regulation, or 
directive of the executive branch that refers to a member or former 
member of the uniformed services as being eligible for, or entitled to, 
retired pay under chapter 1223 of title 10, United States Code, but for 
the fact that the member or former member is under 60 years of age, 
such provision shall be carried out with respect to that member or 
former member by substituting for the reference to being 60 years of 
age, a reference to the age in effect for qualification for such 
retired pay under section 12731(a) of title 10, United States Code, as 
amended by subsection (a).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the first day of the first month beginning on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to retired pay 
payable for that month and subsequent months.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:94-cr-01009-AW-GRJ Document 1223 Filed 06/15/22 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:94-cr-01009-AW-GRJ Document 1223 Filed 06/15/22 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:94-cr-01009-AW-GRJ Document 1223 Filed 06/15/22 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:94-cr-01009-AW-GRJ Document 1223 Filed 06/15/22 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:94-cr-01009-AW-GRJ Document 1223 Filed 06/15/22 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:94-cr-01009-AW-GRJ Document 1223 Filed 06/15/22 Page 6 of 6
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 5:03cr13-RH/WCS

5:04cv230-RH/WCS

CESAR ESTRADA,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING §2255 MOTION

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s second report and

recommendation (document 269), to which no objections have been filed. The

recommendation is for denial of the last remaining claim for relief under 28 U.S.C.

§2255, without an evidentiary hearing (defendant having moved for determination

of the claim without a hearing). The other claims presented in the same §2255

motion were denied by an earlier order (document 261) accepting an earlier report

and recommendation (document 259). I conclude that the second report and

recommendation is correct and that judgment denying all defendant’s claims thus

should be entered. 

Accordingly, 

Case 5:03-cr-00013-RS Document 271 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 5:03cr13-RH/WCS and 5:04cv230-RH/WCS

IT IS ORDERED:

The second report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the

opinion of the court. Defendant’s motion to waive an evidentiary hearing

(document 266) is GRANTED. Defendant’s motion, as amended, for relief under

28 U.S.C. §2255 (document 231) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. The clerk shall

enter judgment and close the file.

SO ORDERED this 2d day of October, 2006.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 5:03-cr-00013-RS Document 271 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of O2 Secure Wireless, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), doeshereby certify, to the best of her knowledge, that:

1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) of the Company complies in all material respectswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ India Creery                               |
|------------------------------------------------|
| India Creery,  Interim Chief Financial Officer |
| Date: May 15,  2007                            |

 

----
# L_2013315EN.01003201.xml

| 26.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 315/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 315/32

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1196/2013

of 22 November 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Stakliškės (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Lithuania’s application to register the name ‘Stakliškės’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Lithuania’s application to register the name ‘Stakliškės’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 November 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 166, 12.6.2013, p. 8.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.8.   Other products listed in Annex I to the Treaty (spices, etc.)

LITHUANIA

Stakliškės (PGI)

---
## List of Documents Posted in Docket No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2012-0028

**# Document Title**  1 List of Documents Posted in Docket No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2012-0028 2 List of Coal Plant and Closest Receiving Water 3 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation [FHW/06-NAT] 4 Plume Interception by a Stream and Contaminant Concentrations at Receptor Wells Located Downgradient from the Stream 5 Algorithms to Pre-Process Leaching Data to Generate Source Terms for Modeling Landfill Leachate Migration in Ground Water. 6 Chemical Specific Data 7 North Carolina Documented Cases of Structural Fills Using Coal Ash as of January 2010 8 Structural Fills That Have Resulted in Damage Cases 9 Advances in Design of Landfills over CCR Ponds and CCR Landfills 10 Houlihan, M., Advances in Design of Landfills Over CCB Ponds and Landfills. 16 January 2013
11 Use of Bottom Ash in the Reinforced Zone of a Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall for the Vertical Expansion of a Sluiced CCR Pond at the Trimble County Generating Station 12North Carolina Statute Allowing Landfills On Top of Surface Impoundments 13 Comment to the Proposed Rule from The Detroit Edison Company 14Assessment of Dam Safety Coal Combustion Surface Impoundments (Task 3) Final Report, Allegheny Energy R. Paul Smith Station 15 Coal Combustion Waste Impoundment Task 3- Dam Assessment Report, American Electric Power John E. Amos Plant
16 Xcel Energy Response to Request for Information relating to Surface Impoundments Under 104 (e) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9604(e). 17 Coal Combustion Waste Impoundment Dam Assessment Report, PPL Generation Martins Creek Steam Electric Station Attachments:
18 Coal Combustion Waste Impoundment Dam Assessment Report, PPL Generation Martins Creek Steam Electric Station Supplemental Information
19 Santee Cooper Grainger Generating Station Proposed Closure Plan Cover Letter. Attachments: 20 Santee Cooper Grainger Generating Station Proposed Closure Plan Executive Summary 21 Santee Cooper Grainger Generating Station Proposed Closure Plan Description 22 Santee Cooper Grainger Generating Station Proposed Closure Plan Engineering Schedule 23 Santee Cooper Grainger Generating Station Proposed Closure Plan Construction Schedule 24 Santee Cooper Grainger Generating Station Proposed Closure Plan Grading Plan 25 Santee Cooper Grainger Generating Station Proposed Closure Plan Section Drawings 26 Santee Cooper Grainger Generating Station Proposed Closure Plan Alternatives Analysis 27 Santee Cooper Grainger Generating Station Proposed Closure Plan Laboratory Analytical Data 28 Challenges of Closing Large Fly Ash Ponds 29 Comparison of the Final Notice to the Draft Notice received by the Office of Management and Budget on February 2, 2012.
§ 3.15 Liquidation of collateral. ( a ) In accordance with applicable laws and regulations, agencies may liquidate security or collateral through a sale or a nonjudicial foreclosure and apply the proceeds to the applicable debt(s), if the debtor fails to pay the debt(s) within a reasonable time after demand and if such action is in the interest of the United States. Collection from other sources, including liquidation of security or collateral, is not a prerequisite to requiring payment by a surety, insurer, or guarantor unless such action is expressly required by statute or contract.
( b ) When an agency learns that a bankruptcy petition has been filed with respect to a debtor, the agency may request legal advice from OGC concerning the impact of the Bankruptcy Code, including, but not limited to, 11 U.S.C. 362, to determine the applicability of the automatic stay and the procedures for obtaining relief from such stay prior to proceeding under paragraph (a) of this section.
Exhibit
23.1




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board
of Directors and Stockholders


Animal
Health International, Inc.:




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-142521) on Form S-8 of Animal Health International, Inc. of our reports
dated September 9, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Animal Health International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2008 and
2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’
equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of years in the
three-year period ended June 30, 2008 and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as of June 30, 2008, which reports appear in the
2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Animal Health International,
Inc.




Our
report dated September 9, 2008, contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that Animal Health International, Inc. adopted the provisions of the
Financial Accounting Standards Board's (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" in
fiscal year 2008, and adopted the provisions of the FASB's Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 (revised 2004),
“Share-Based Payment” in fiscal year 2007.




/s/
      KPMG LLP




Dallas,
Texas


September 9,
2008
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BAY MEDICAL

CENTER, et al.,

VS CASE NO. 5:03cv144/MCR/MD

HUMANA MILITARY HEALTHCARE

SERVICES INC.

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Magistrate Judge Davis on December 21, 2006 

Type of Motion/Pleading: ...MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING PRODUCTION OF

DOCUMENTS FROM PLAINTIFF BAPTIST HOSPITAL, INC., AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW

Filed by: defendant/HMHS on 12/21/06 Document 277

( ) Stipulated/Consented/Joint Pleading

RESPONSES:

Plaintiff Baptist Hospital on 12/29/06 Doc.# 280 

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 /s/ C. Justice

Deputy Clerk

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 8th day of

January, 2007, that:

(a)The requested relief is DENIED.

(b)See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3); the requested documents (an e-mail

inquiry and responses) were clearly “prepared in anticipation of

litigation” by a representative of the plaintiff, and defendant

has not shown substantial need or undue hardship as the rule

requires. The matter of an attorney’s mental impressions becomes

relevant only if the documents are ordered produced. Defendant’s

speculation that there may have been “improper communications,”

without substantive allegations of any such communications, is

meaningless.

(c)To the extent that they support defendant’s theory, Hudson v.

General Dynamics Corp., 186 F.R.D. 271 (D.Conn 1999) and Dobbs v.

Lamonts Apparel, Inc., 155 F.R.D. 650 (D.Alaska 1994) are

unpersuasive. The e-mails in question were prepared and obtained

in anticipation of litigation at the direction of counsel, and

are not discoverable absent the requisite showings. 

/s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 5:03-cv-00144-MCR-MD Document 282 Filed 01/08/07 Page 1 of 1