alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:97-cr-00011-MP

RODERICK LEANDER DAWSON,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 438, Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of

this court's previous orders denying defendant's motions for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

While defendant states that this request is not to be construed as a petition under § 2255,

defendant is ultimately seeking to vacate his sentence. Therefore, defendant's motion is actually

a request for a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Farris v. United States, 333

F.3d 1211, 1216 (11th Cir. 2003) (citing Mobley v. Head, 306 F.3d 1096 (11th Cir.2002)).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, "a second or successive motion must be certified as provided in

section 2244 by a panel of the appropriate court of appeals ." Defendant has failed to obtain

authorization from the court of appeals prior to filing this motion. Therefore, this Court is

without jurisdiction to consider the Petitioner's motion. See Farris, 333 F.3d at 1216. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

That the defendant's motion for reconsideration, construed as a second or successive

motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, is DISMISSED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of January, 2006

Case 1:97-cr-00011-MP Document 441 Filed 01/19/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:97-cr-00011-MP

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:97-cr-00011-MP Document 441 Filed 01/19/06 Page 2 of 2
### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. FAA Case No. 2010NM010105 In the Matters of: FDMS No. FAA-2011-0682 Aviation Technical Services, Inc. Honorable Richard 

### C. Goodwin


### Declaration

.(Confidential Order) I have read the administrative lawjudge'sOrder ofOctober 18, 2012, sealing the exhibits and tnmscript in the above proceeding. Iunderstand that the Initial Decision in this case is subject to the same restrictions.

Per paragraph 4 ofthe October 18, 2012 Order, I agree to be bound and al:>ide 

### by its tenus.

Principal Maintenance Inspector



# RECEIVED MAY 292013 

## HEARING uOCKET

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY that the foregoing Declaration hasbeen served via facsimile and regular mail this date, to 

### the following: The Honorable Richard 

### C. Goodwin Office ofHearings, 

### M-20 · 1200 New Jersey Avenue, 

### S.E. EastBuilding Ground Floor, Rm E12-320 Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: (202) 366-2139 FAX: (202) 366-7536 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright**Building~** Suite 2Wl

### 000 Federal Aviation Administration 800 

### Independence Ave. SW. Washington, DC 20591 FAX: (202) 493-5142 DATED this 

### 21st day of

### May, 2013. 

## I'

# Kti(.tt~ tJf·{uL ,- :'



# ;vr Dana Stephenson 

### Office ofRegional Cotinsel 

### (ANM-7) Federal Aviation Administration· 1601 Lind Ave. SW Renton, W A 98057 (425)227-2164.
#### In re TRINITY AVE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 20, 1906.)

In the matter of Trinity Avenue.

No opinion. Motion denied, on paynient of $10 costs; leave given as stated in order. Order filed.
#### § 3800.4 Authority to act for the Chairperson.

When the Chairperson is absent or temporarily unavailable, the Deputy Chairperson is authorized to act for the Chairperson.
#### § 46.40 Inspection service.

The rules and regulations of the Secretary governing inspection and certification of fresh fruits and vegetables as outlined in part 51 of this chapter; and frozen fruits and vegetables as outlined in part 52 of this chapter, and amendments thereto, and such additional amendments as may from time to time be promulgated shall govern the inspection of such products under the Act and are hereby made a part of the regulations in this part.
#### § 457.1 Applicability.

The provisions of this part are applicable only to crops for which a crop provision is published as a section to 7 CFR part 457 and then only for the crops and crop year designated by the application section.
#### § 51.1554 Mature.

*Mature* means that the skins of the potatoes are generally firmly set and not more than 5 percent of the potatoes in the lot have more than one-tenth of the skin missing or “feathered.”
28.102-3 Contract clauses.

(a) Insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 52.228-15, Performance and Payment

Bonds-Construction, in solicitations and contracts for construction that contain a requirement for

performance and payment bonds if the resultant contract is expected to exceed $150,000. The

contracting officer may revise paragraphs (b)(1) and/or (b)(2) of the clause to establish a lower

percentage in accordance with 28.102-2(b). If the provision at 52.228-1 is not included in the

solicitation, the contracting officer must set a period of time for return of executed bonds.

(b) Insert the clause at 52.228-13, Alternative Payment Protections, in solicitations and contracts for

construction, when the estimated or actual value exceeds $35,000 but does not exceed $150,000.

Complete the clause by specifying the payment protections selected (see 28.102-1(b)(1)) and the

deadline for submission. The contracting officer may revise paragraph (b) of the clause to establish a

lower percentage in accordance with 28.102-2(c).

Parent topic: 28.102 Performance and payment bonds and alternative payment protections for

construction contracts.
#### Frankie M. Florence et al., Appellants, v Henry Krasucki et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: This is an appeal from an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 dismissing plaintiffs’ action for declaratory and injunctive relief arising from an incident on October 20, 1978 when defendant Freer and defendants State troopers evicted plaintiffs, migrant farm workers, from the dwellings provided for them as a part of their compensation as apple pickers at defendant Freer Fruit Farms, Inc. Plaintiffs request a decree declaring that the eviction, which allegedly was not preceded by notice and hearing, violated their rights under article 7 of Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law and under the New York State Constitution. They further request a permanent injunction prohibiting defendants from removing or threatening to remove plaintiffs from their residences. An action in United States District Court, previously commenced by plaintiffs against the same defendants, is pending. Special Term did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint (see CPLR 3001; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3001.07). Plaintiffs do not dispute that they no longer reside on the premises in question and do not claim that they will or might do so in the future; thus, neither declaratory nor injunctive relief would have an "immediate and practical effect of influencing [the] conduct” of the parties *(New York Public Interest Research Group v Carey,*42 NY2d 527, 531; see 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3001.09b) and any decree would be advisory only. Moreover, plaintiffs’ pending action in Federal court for money damages against the same defendants will determine essentially the same issues as those raised in the instant action (see *Ithaca Textiles v Waverly Lingerie Sales Co.,*24 AD2d 133, 134, affd 18 NY2d 885; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3001.09a). Dismissal of the instant complaint also avoids possible contradictory judicial determinations (see *Prashker v United States Guar. Co., 1*NY2d 584, 591) and increased litigation (see *Smith v Western Union Tel. Co.,*276 App Div 210, 213, affd 302 NY 683; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3001.09d). We do not reach the other issues raised on appeal. (Appeal from order of Wayne Supreme Court—injunction.) Present— Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<LEGEND>
                                                  EXHIBIT 27.1

                          FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                    COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
                        ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X

          This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Balance
Sheets of King World Productions, Inc. and its Subsidiaries and is quali-
fied in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                   <C>

MULTIPLIER                            1,000
CURRENCY                              U.S. DOLLARS
PERIOD-TYPE                           2nd QUARTER
FISCAL-YEAR-END                       08/31/98
PERIOD-START                          12/01/97
PERIOD-END                            02/28/98
EXCHANGE-RATE                         1
CASH                                  $213,189
SECURITIES                            $0
RECEIVABLES                           $91,685
ALLOWANCES                            $3,301
INVENTORY                             $0
CURRENT ASSETS                        $555,907
PP&E                                  $28,561
DEPRECIATION                          $12,608
TOTAL-ASSETS                          $952,186
CURRENT-LIABILITIES                   $98,863
BONDS                                 $0
COMMON                                $880
PREFERRED-MANDATORY                   $0
PREFERRED                             $0
OTHER-SE                              $852,443
TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY            $952,186
SALES                                 $0
TOTAL-REVENUES                        $173,916
CGS                                   $0
TOTAL-COSTS                           $110,694
OTHER-EXPENSES                        $19,115
LOSS-PROVISION                        $0
INTEREST-EXPENSE                      $0
INCOME-PRETAX                         $51,285
INCOME-TAX                            $17,707
INCOME-CONTINUING                     $33,578
DISCONTINUED                          $0
EXTRAORDINARY                         $0
CHANGES                               $0
NET-INCOME                            $33,578
EPS-PRIMARY*                          $0.46
EPS-DILUTED*                          $0.44

-------------------
* Adjusted to reflect a two-for-1 stock split, effected as a stock
dividend, on February 17, 1998.
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Kohlberg Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Dayl W. Pearson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 28, 2010 |  | By: |  | /S/ DAYL W. PEARSON                  
|                   |  |     |  | Dayl W. Pearson                      
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

STEPHAN HOMEWOOD, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 1:20cv244-MW/GRJ

ALACHUA COUNTY 

SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation, ECF No. 5. Upon consideration, with no objections having 

been filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “This action is DISMISSED for 

failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute.” The Clerk shall close 

the file. 

SO ORDERED on December 30, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00244-MW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 12/30/20 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1916

ROSE B. MOUMOUNI,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WENDELL SUMTER; DANIEL PFIEFFER; DANA COLTER-WILLIAMS; DR. 

JEANIE LIGON; DR. ANTWON SUTTON; DEMORRIOUS ROBINSON,

 Defendants - Appellees,

and

CHESTER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (0:22-cv-01697-MGL-SVH)

Submitted: January 17, 2023 Decided: January 19, 2023

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rose B. Moumouni, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1916 Doc: 5 Filed: 01/19/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Rose B. Moumouni seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate 

judge’s recommendation and dismissing some, but not all, Defendants from her civil case. 

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Moumouni seeks 

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1916 Doc: 5 Filed: 01/19/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
23.301 Definition.

Hazardous material is defined in the latest version of Federal Standard No.313 (Federal Standards

are sold to the public and Federal agencies throughGeneral Services Administration Specifications Unit (3 FBP-W) 7 th & D Sts. SW Washington, DC

20407.

Parent topic: Subpart 23.3 - Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS AND NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: #'S 2 AND 4, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             327
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,187
<INVENTORY>                                     51,089
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,789
<PP&E>                                          41,330
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,180
<BONDS>                                         42,817
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,233
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,250
<SALES>                                        134,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               145,918
<CGS>                                          113,970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  113,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,777
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,146
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    887
<INCOME-TAX>                                       150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                737
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       737
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
12.505 Applicability of certain laws to contracts for the acquisition of COTS items.       COTS items are a subset of commercial products. Therefore, any laws listed in sections 12.503 and 12.504 are also inapplicable or modified in their applicability to contracts or subcontracts for the acquisition of COTS items. In addition, the following laws are not applicable to contracts for the acquisition of COTS items:                                       (a)                                                         (1) The portion of 41 U.S.C. 8302 , American Materials Required for Public Use, paragraph (a)(1) that reads “substantially all from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States,” Buy American—Supplies, domestic content test, except as provided in 25.101(a)(2)(ii) (see 52.225-1 and 52.225-3).                                                            (2)The portion of 41 U.S.C. 8303, Contracts for Public Works, paragraph (a)(2) that reads “substantially all from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States,” Buy American—Construction Materials, domestic content test, except as provided in 25.201(b)(2)(ii)(see 52.225-9 and 52.225-11).                                                                             (b)                   42 U.S.C. 69 62(c)(3)(A), Certification and Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material.                                          (c) Compliance Plan and Certification Requirement, section 1703 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Pub. L. 112-239), Title XVII, Ending trafficking in Government Contracting (see 52.222-50(h) and 52.222-56).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 12.5 - Applicability of Certain Laws to the Acquisition of Commercial Products, Commercial Services and Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf Items
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  26 LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended
March  31,  2006,  as  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                        /s/ Robert P Johnson
                            Robert P. Johnson, President
                            AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                            Managing Member
                            May 5, 2006



                        /s/ Patrick W Keene
                            Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                            AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                            Managing Member
                            May 5, 2006
29–008 

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 108–710 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 5183, SURFACE 

TRANSPORTATION EXTENSION ACT OF 2004, PART V 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2004.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 811] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 811, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5183, Surface 

Transportation Extension Act of 2004, Part V, under a closed rule. 

The rule provides one hour of debate in the House equally divided 

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,887,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      10,220,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,388,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,311,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          433,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,311,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,986,300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,186,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (134,300)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                46,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                923,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            923,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   923,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    30.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 500.4 Conformity with signs and emergency directions.

Persons in and on property of the USNA shall comply with official signs of prohibitory or directive nature and with the directions of authorized individuals.