alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: "Chari, Desi (D)" <dchari@dow.com>

To: Bill Neuffer/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/17/2012 03:52 PM

Subject: Nitric acid NSPS - Information Needed

Dear Bill,

Please find attached information from a single pressure, small scale Nitric Acid plant operated by the Dow 

Chemical Company at its Sterlington Louisiana Plant (formerly Angus Chemicals). Hope this information would be 

helpful as EPA considers our comments on the proposed revisions to the Nitric Acid NSPS regulations. 

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at 978-557-1814 or dchari@dow..com

Regards,

Desi Chari

Operations Regulatory Services

The Dow Chemical Company

60 Willow Street

North Andover, MA 01845

978-57-1814 (Work)

978-758-6332 (Mobile)
160 So.2d 224

#### In re Investigation of Alleged Discrimination against Mrs. Lite B. BIENVENU, Applicant for Public Welfare Director II Position, St. Martin Parish.

No. 47054.

Feb. 7, 1964.

In re: The Commissioner of Public Welfare, State of Louisiana applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. 158 So.2d 213.

Writ refused. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.

McCALEB, J.,

concurs in the denial of the application in view of the provisions of paragraph (N) (2) of Section 15 of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Case 4:20-cr-00042-AW-MAF Document 8 Filed 09/01/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:20-cr-00042-AW-MAF Document 8 Filed 09/01/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:20-cr-00042-AW-MAF Document 8 Filed 09/01/20 Page 3 of 3
#### § 51.1585 Mature.

*Mature* means that the outer skin (epidermis) does not loosen or “feather” readily during the ordinary methods of handling.
#### The State ex rel. Martin, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Martin v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 131.]

(No. 97-501

Submitted July 15, 1998

Decided September 16, 1998.)

*Dean G. Reinhard Co., L.P.A,*and *Charles Zamora,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Craigg E. Gould,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
22.1303 Applicability.

(a) The Act applies to all contracts and subcontracts for personal property and nonpersonal services

(including construction) of $150,000 or more except as waived by the Secretary of Labor.

(b) The requirements of the clause at 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans, in any contract

with a State or local government (or any agency, instrumentality, or subdivision) do not apply to any

agency, instrumentality, or subdivision of that government that does not participate in work on or

under the contract.

(c) The Act requires submission of the VETS-4212 Report in all cases where the contractor or

subcontractor has received an award of $150,000 or more, except for awards to State and local

governments, and foreign organizations where the workers are recruited outside of the United

States.

Parent topic: Subpart 22.13 - Equal Opportunity for Veterans
27.304-2 Contracts placed by or for other

Government agencies.

The following procedures apply unless an interagency agreement provides otherwise:

(a) When a Government agency requests another Government agency to award a contract on its

behalf, the request should explain any special circumstances surrounding the contract and specify

the patent rights clause to be used. The clause should be selected and modified, if necessary, in

accordance with the policies and procedures of this subpart. If, however, the request states that a

clause of the requesting agency is required (e.g., because of statutory requirements, a deviation, or

exceptional circumstances), the awarding agency shall use that clause rather than those of this

subpart.

(1) If the request states that an agency clause is required and the work to be performed under the

contract is not severable and is funded wholly or in part by the requesting agency, then include the

requesting agency clause and no other patent rights clause in the contract.

(2) If the request states that an agency clause is required, and the work to be performed under the

contract is severable, then the contracting officer shall assure that the requesting agency clause

applies only to that severable portion of the work and that the work for the awarding agency is

subject to the appropriate patent rights clause.

(3) If the request states that a requesting agency clause is not required in any resulting contract, the

awarding agency shall use the appropriate patent rights clause, if any.

(b) Any action requiring an agency determination, report, or deviation involved in the use of the

requesting agency’s clause is the responsibility of the requesting agency unless the agencies agree

otherwise. However, the awarding agency may not alter the requesting agency’s clause without

prior approval of the requesting agency.

(c) The requesting agency may require, and provide instructions regarding, the forwarding or

handling of any invention disclosures or other reporting requirements of the specified clauses.

Normally, the requesting agency is responsible for the administration of any subject inventions. This

responsibility shall be established in advance of awarding any contracts.

Parent topic: 27.304 Procedures.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 5:03cr33/MCR

5:09cv135/MCR/CJK

DAVID E. MARTINELLI

 /

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Order and

Second Amended Report and Recommendation (“Report and Recommendation”), dated

November 30, 2011 (doc. 426). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.1

2. The amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (doc. 362)

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of January, 2012.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The court would note, however, that the trial of this matter lasted for three weeks, rather than three

1

days as indicated on page 3 of the Report and Recommendation.

Case 5:03-cr-00033-MCR-CJK Document 428 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 1
28.311-2 Agency solicitation provisions and

contract clauses.

Agencies may prescribe their own solicitation provisions and contract clauses to implement the basic

policies contained in this subpart 28.3.

Parent topic: 28.311 Solicitation provision and contract clause on liability insurance under costreimbursement contracts.
# L_2021283EN.01000901.xml

| 6.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 283/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 283/9

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/1302

of 5 August 2021

implementing Article 11(1) of Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 of 3 May 2012 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (1), and in particular Article 11(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 3 May 2012, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 377/2012. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 3 May 2012, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 377/2012.

| (2) | The Council considers that two persons should be removed from the list of persons subject to restrictive measures, as set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 377/2012. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Council considers that two persons should be removed from the list of persons subject to restrictive measures, as set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 377/2012.

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 August 2021.

For the Council

The President

G. DOVŽAN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 119, 4.5.2012, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

In Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 377/2012, the entries concerning the persons listed below are deleted:

| ‘17. | Commander (Navy) Bion NA TCHONGO (a.k.a. Nan Tchongo) |
| --- | --- |

‘17.

Commander (Navy) Bion NA TCHONGO (a.k.a. Nan Tchongo)

| 19. | Captain Paulo SUNSAI.’ |
| --- | --- |

19.

Captain Paulo SUNSAI.’

---
# 16.203-3 Limitations.

A fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment *shall* not be used unless the *contracting officer* determines that it is necessary either to protect the contractor and the Government against significant fluctuations in labor or material costs or to provide for contract price adjustment in the event of changes in the contractor’s *established prices*.

**Parent topic:**16.203 Fixed-price contracts with economic price adjustment.
15.204 Contract format.       The use of a uniform contract format facilitates preparation of the solicitation and contract as well as reference to, and use of, those documents by offerors, contractors, and contract administrators. The uniform contract format need not be used for the following:                                       (a)                    						            Construction and architect-engineer contracts (see part  36).                                          (b)                    						            Subsistence contracts.                                          (c)                    						            Supplies or services contracts requiring special contract formats prescribed elsewhere in this regulation that are inconsistent with the uniform format.                                          (d)                    						            Letter requests for proposals (see 15.203(e)).                                          (e)                    						            Contracts exempted by the agency head or designee.    **15.204-1 Uniform contract format.****15.204-2 Part I-The Schedule.****15.204-3 Part II-Contract Clauses.****15.204-4 Part III-List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments.****15.204-5 Part IV-Representations and Instructions.****Parent topic:** Subpart 15.2 - Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Kohlberg Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report), I, Dayl W. Pearson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 15, 2012

          

          By:/s/ Dayl W. PearsonDayl W. Pearson President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
32.003 Simplified acquisition procedures

financing.

Unless agency regulations otherwise permit, contract financing shall not be provided for purchases

made under the authority of part 13.

Parent topic: Part 32 - Contract Financing
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of WSB Financial Group, Inc. (the “*Company*”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “*Form 10-K*”), I, David K. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: (1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.Dated: March 28, 2007         By:                                              /s/ David K. Johnson   David K. Johnson   *President and Chief Executive Officer*
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.10 Description of the Rural Business Investment Company Program.

The Rural Business Investment Company (“RBIC”) Program is a Developmental Capital program for the purpose of promoting economic development and the creation of wealth and job opportunities in Rural Areas and among individuals living in such Areas. To this end, the Agency will select and license RBIC Applicants that will agree to address the unmet Equity Capital needs of Smaller Enterprises primarily located in Rural Areas.
SCWC-12-0000095 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

VIHN ALKIRE-CLEMEN, 

Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant,

vs.

CASTLE MEDICAL CENTER, 

Respondent/Employer-Appellee, Self-insured,

and

CRAWFORD AND COMPANY,

Respondent/Insurance Adjuster-Appellee. 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-12-0000095; CASE NO. AB 2003-121(S) (2-02-09980))

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant’s Application for Writ of

Certiorari, filed on July 20, 2013, is hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 19, 2013.

Vihn Alkire-Clemen

petitioner pro se

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-12-0000095

19-AUG-2013

10:59 AM
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John I. Outlaw, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered August 1, 1978, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal also brings up for review the denial at sentencing of defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea. Judgment reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, motion to withdraw defendant’s plea of guilty granted and action remanded to the County Court for further proceedings consistent herewith. When defendant’s counsel reviewed the probation report just prior to sentencing he was first made aware of the codefendant’s acquittal 10 months earlier after a trial on the indictment charging the defendants with aiding and abetting each other in the sale of narcotics. Defendant immediately sought to withdraw his guilty plea and unseal the records in the codefendant’s case. This motion was granted to the extent of unsealing the records and providing defendant with a transcript of the trial. After reviewing the transcript the defendant moved again to withdraw his plea and to dismiss the indictment. This motion was denied, without a hearing, and the defendant was sentenced on his guilty plea entered before he was aware of the acquittal and evidence in the transcript. The evidence at the codefendant’s trial revealed a conflict in testimony between the informer, who led the undercover officers to the defendants, and the undercover officers as to which defendant actually handed over the narcotics, and the clothing which each defendant wore at the time. In an affidavit submitted by the defendant, he maintained his innocence and said his plea, with its inculpatory statement, was prompted by (1) terror and blind fear that a jury would not believe his denial of guilt and he would be convicted on each count based on his prior record and (2) the assumption that the prosecutor’s statement in plea negotiations of an "open and shut” case against the defendant was based on police officers’ testimony to the effect that it was he who possessed and sold the controlled substance. In view of the conflicting testimony in the codefendant’s trial transcript, coupled with the assertion of innocence by the defendant under oath and the misapprehension as to the strength of the prosecution’s case engendered by the prosecutor’s representation, there was presented on the motion to withdraw more than a mere issue of credibility (see *People v Dixon,*29 NY2d 55). "Under the circumstances, the interests of justice would have been served better had he been permitted to withdraw his guilty plea” *(People v McIntyre,*40 AD2d 1038). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, O’Connor and Lazer, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# Time and Date:

9 a.m. (Eastern Time) February 16, 2010.

# Place:

4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

# Status:

Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

## Parts Open to the Public

1. Approval of the minutes of the January 19, 2010 Board member meeting.

2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.

a. Monthly Participant Activity Report.

b. Monthly Investment Performance Report.

c. Legislative Report.

3. Vendor Financial Update.

4. Report on Participant Behavior in the Financial Crisis.

5. Thrift Savings Plan Enhancement Act Implementation Update.

6. DOL Audit Briefing.

## Parts Closed to the Public

7. Proprietary Data.

8. Personnel.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

Dated: February 9, 2010.

Thomas K. Emswiler,

Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-3001 Filed 2-11-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
§ 371.7 Animal Care. ( a ) *General statement.* Animal Care (AC) establishes acceptable standards of humane care and treatment for regulated animals and monitors and achieves compliance through inspections, enforcement, education, and cooperative efforts under the Animal Welfare and Horse Protection Acts.
( b ) *Deputy Administrator of AC.* The Deputy Administrator of AC is responsible for: ( 1 ) Participating with the Administrator of APHIS and other officials in the planning and formulation of policies, programs, and activities of APHIS.
( 2 ) Directing activities to ensure compliance with and enforcement of animal welfare and horse protection laws and regulations. These laws are: ( i ) The Animal Welfare Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 2131 through 2159); and
( ii ) The Horse Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1821 through 1831).
( 3 ) Providing recommendations for policy and program changes and promulgating requirements, procedures, and guidelines for the conduct of field activities relating to AC programs.
162 So.2d 576

#### Felton N. BROWN v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 47203.

April 17, 1964.

Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit.

160 So.2d 776.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices 

# Order

October 25, 2006

132268 (20)

BOBBY WILLIAMS, #147572

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 132268
CoA: 271496 TRANSCOR AMERICA L.L.C.,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it
is DENIED because MCL 600. 2963; MSA 27A.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $27.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned
with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being
filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partia l fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $348.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file furth er appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.
The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of th is order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 25, 2006

jm