alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                                         207
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  176
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   140
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                       1,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                               1,090
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   663
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               417
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                93
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                160
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            160
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                866
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 1,026
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 5.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
#### Mary L. McKay, Respondent, v Dennis J. McKay, Appellant.

In an action for divorce, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered January 18, 1978, as (1) dismissed his counterclaim for divorce, (2) awarded custody of the parties’ minor child to the plaintiff, (3) awarded alimony and child support to the plaintiff, and (4) awarded exclusive possession of the marital residence to the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Special Term correctly dismissed defendant’s counterclaim for divorce based on cruel and inhuman treatment and granted plaintiff a divorce on the same ground. The court did not find any conduct on the part of the plaintiff which would make it unsafe or improper for the defendant to continue to cohabit with her and, on the record before us, we agree. Moreover, as the trial court possesses wide discretion to determine the issue of cruel and inhuman conduct, such determinations will not be lightly overturned by this tribunal (see *Arnold v Arnold,*52 AD2d 546). We have considered defendant’s contentions regarding the award of custody of the infant child, the granting of alimony and child support, and the award of exclusive possession of the marital residence to the plaintiff, and have found them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
#### § 46.38 Sundays and holidays included.

Sundays and holidays shall be included in the computation of all other periods mentioned in the Act or in the regulations in this part.
149 So.2d 769

#### PIONEER BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. Paul L. ODUM, Sr.

No. 46612.

Feb. 21, 1963.

Writs refused. The applicant has not shown that he is ready and willing to purge himself of contempt.

HAWTHORNE, McCALEB and SUMMERS, JJ., believe that the sentence is illegal, being violative of R.S. 13:4611(A) (3); Art. 226, C.C.P. Hence, the writs, should be granted to that extent as the majority view herein divests applicant of his absolute statutory rights to purge himself of contempt.
<page>
                                                                 Exhibit 31.1

Certification required by Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Kevin T. Knight, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Nordstrom Credit, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date:  June 14, 2005                      /s/ Kevin T. Knight
       -------------                      ----------------------
                                          Kevin T. Knight
                                          President of Nordstrom Credit, Inc.
Case 4:97-cv0212-WS Document 64Filed 04/2798 Page1of
#### §§ 4279.79-4279.83 [Reserved]
Exhibit 99.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

        Inconnection with the Annual Report of Theragenics Corporation®, (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, James A. MacLennan, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:
#### § 3560.10 Conflict of interest.

To reduce the potential for employee conflict of interest, all RHS activities will be conducted in accordance with 7 CFR part 1900, subpart D.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

FREDDIE WILSON,

Petitioner,

v. Case No.: 4:20cv326-MW/MAF

KATHLEEN HAWKINS SAWYER,

Federal Bureau of Prisons,

Respondent.

______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation, ECF No. 8. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “This action is DISMISSED with 

prejudice as moot.” The Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on December 14, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00326-MW-MAF Document 9 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 1
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60407 

Conference Calendar

__________________

BILLY J. PATTON,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STANFORD YOUNG, Attorney at Law,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:95-CV-40LN

- - - - - - - - - -

December 19, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Billy J. Patton appeals the district court's dismissal as

frivolous of his in forma pauperis (IFP) civil rights complaint. 

Patton sued his privately-retained counsel, alleging that counsel

rendered ineffective assistance in a criminal proceeding.

 We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Patton's appeal is without

arguable merit and is thus frivolous. Accordingly, we DISMISS
No. 95-60407

-2-

the appeal. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Patton's motion for extraordinary

relief is DENIED. We caution Patton that any additional

frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of

sanctions. To avoid sanctions Patton is further cautioned to

review any pending appeals to ensure that they are not frivolous.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

WILLIAM ALLEN HAWTHORNE,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5856-MCR-EMT

MARK S. INCH,

Respondent.

______________________________/

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on July 2, 

2021. ECF No. 14. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-05856-MCR-EMT Document 16 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5856-MCR-EMT

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 

14, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 12, is GRANTED; and the 

petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 7, is DISMISSED with prejudice as 

untimely.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of September 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05856-MCR-EMT Document 16 Filed 09/09/21 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       9,200,190
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     121,305,276
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,598,817
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  9,830,142
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      12,097,160
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        12,587,232
<LOANS>                                    130,837,049
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,568,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             174,374,063
<DEPOSITS>                                 147,452,886
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,195,049
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,450,398
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       807,800
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,467,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             174,374,063
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,483,673
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              354,035
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                34,577
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,872,285
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,254,041
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,343,658
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,528,627
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  135,800
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (12,171)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,886,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,013,531
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,013,531
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   638,731
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.43
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,393,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   328,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               293,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,422,603
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   77,142
<RECOVERIES>                                    87,207
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,568,468
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,568,468
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice of Intent to enter into an Enhanced-Use Lease.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Secretary of VA intends to enter into an EUL on a 1-acre parcel of land at the George E. Wahlen VAMC in Salt Lake City, Utah. The selected lessee will finance, design, develop, construct, manage, maintain and operate the EUL development. As consideration for the lease, the lessee will be required to build, operate, and maintain a transitional housing facility; provide preference and priority placement for homeless Veterans and Veterans at risk of homelessness; and provide a                               ( print page 72872)                            supportive services program that guides resident Veterans toward attaining long-term self-sufficiency.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Edward Bradley, Office of Asset Enterprise Management (044C), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-7778 (this is not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Title 38 U.S.C. 8161                     *et seq.*                     states that the Secretary may enter into an enhanced-use lease if he determines that implementation of a business plan proposed by the Under Secretary for Health for applying the consideration under such a lease for the provision of medical care and services would result in a demonstrable improvement of services to eligible Veterans in the geographic service-delivery area within which the property is located. This project meets this requirement.                

Approved: November 10, 2010.

John R. Gingrich,

Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2010-29750 Filed 11-24-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 5:91cr5014LAC

CLARENCE WILLARD WOMBLE

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on August 9, 2006 

Motion/Pleadings MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF A PREVIOUSLY DENIED

RULE 60(b)(4), pursuant to a motion to invalidate the District Court’s order denying Womble’s

original 2255 motion 

Filed byDEFENDANT PRO SE on 7/27/06 Doc.# 708

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 15

th day of

August, 2006, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 5:91-cr-05014-LC-MD Document 709 Filed 08/15/06 Page 1 of 1
§ 4284.512 Evaluation process. ( a ) Applications will be evaluated by qualified reviewers appointed by the Agency.
( b ) After all proposals have been evaluated using the evaluation criteria and scored in accordance with the point allocation specified in the applicable RFP, the Agency will present to the Administrator of RBS a list of all applications in rank order, together with funding level recommendations.
#### § 3570.251 Purpose.

This subpart contains the provisions and procedures by which the Agency will administer the Essential Community Facilities Technical Assistance and Training Program. The purpose of the program is to provide technical assistance and training with respect to essential community facilities programs. To meet this purpose, the Agency will make grants to public bodies and private nonprofit corporations, (such as States, counties, cities, townships, and incorporated towns and villages, boroughs, authorities, districts, and Indian tribes on Federal and State reservations) to provide associations Technical Assistance and/or training with respect to essential community facilities programs. The Technical Assistance and/or training will assist communities, Indian Tribes, and Nonprofit Corporations to identify and plan for community facility needs that exist in their area. Once those needs have been identified, the Grantee can assist in identifying public and private resources to finance those identified community facility needs.
IllO O2l0 02 07/ 12/20 10 10:53 FAX 512239 2346 RE~IEDI ATl OS 

mC!: rr:r.r.y 

July 8, 2010 

Alfredo "1'.1" Am1endariz, Ph.D. 


Reglona.l AdminiSlra!or, 6-A 


U.S. En vironme~taJ Protection Agency, Region 6 


1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 


DnlJa$, Tcxa~ 75 20:-2733 


RE: 	 ?roposed Listing ofth/! es~ County Rosd 11 2 Grouncw31t:r ~;! e OJ! the Federal Nati onal 

Priorities Lis! 

Dear Dr Armendanz: 

Texa." supports the C.S. E!!VlfOnrnent&J :!'role.::!ion Agency' s (EPA) decisicr: th~! the West 

Count y-Road 112 grv:mdv.-:.ller "ile be con id~red a candidate for the National Prioril) eS Lis! 

(N"PL) for c.lcanup. 

Tr.t Texas Corr..'l1iss!on on Env;rOJul1ental Quality (TCEQ) believes that this sile is eligihie for 

the propo5ed NPL based on EP,\ ·s cvabatin!": ofihe site under the federa: Hazard RMking 

System 

Sin::-cely. 

70ik ?~J 

-

'" '­ ~ 

c:: 

r­

"") 

N 

:x " < ~ 

0 

en 

Rick Perry R.ECEIVED 

Govcrr.or 

RY tzp PEMEDlAJION DlvlSlON 

cc: Bryan 'V Shaw, Ph.D., ·Chainn2n, TCEQ 

Mark R. VicK ery, P.G .. Executi""Je Directo)", TCEQ 

Mr .John Sadlier, DeputY Dr,e::tor. OfflC~ of Compli an:::c and Enforcement. TCEQ 

:--·1 r Breni Wade, Directo;·, RCr:1.:.aiatHHl Division. TCEQ