alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
22.1102 Definition.

Professional employee, as used in this subpart, means any person meeting the definition of

"employee employed in a bona fide . . . professional capacity" given in 29 CFR541. The term

embraces members of those professions having a recognized status based upon acquiring

professional knowledge through prolonged study. Examples of these professions include

accountancy, actuarial computation, architecture, dentistry, engineering, law, medicine, nursing,

pharmacy, the sciences (such as biology, chemistry, and physics, and teaching). To be a professional

employee, a person must not only be a professional but must be involved essentially in discharging

professional duties.

Parent topic: Subpart 22.11 - Professional Employee Compensation
23.204 Procurement exemptions.       An agency is not required to procure an ENERGY STAR® or FEMP-designated product if the head of the agency determines in writing that-                                       (a) 						            No ENERGY STAR® or FEMP-designated product is reasonably available that meets the functional requirements of the agency; or                                          (b) 						            No ENERGY STAR® or FEMP-designated product is cost effective over the life of the product taking energy cost savings into account.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 23.2 - Energy and Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy
114 STAT. 320 PUBLIC LAW 106–209—MAY 26, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1377:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 145 (1999): May 24, considered and passed House.

Nov. 19, considered and passed Senate, amended.

Vol. 146 (2000): May 15, House concurred in Senate amendments.

Æ

Public Law 106–209

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 9308 South

Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘John J. Buchanan Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service, located at

9308 South Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60617, is designated

as the ‘‘John J. Buchanan Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘John

J. Buchanan Post Office Building’’.

Approved May 26, 2000.

May 26, 2000

[H.R. 1377]
#### § 3550.3 Civil rights.

RHS will administer its programs fairly, and in accordance with both the letter and the spirit of all equal opportunity and fair housing legislation and applicable executive orders. Loans, grants, services, and benefits provided under this part shall not be denied to any person based on race, color, national origin, sex, religion, marital status, familial status, age, physical or mental disability, receipt of income from public assistance, or because the applicant has, in good faith, exercised any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1601 *et seq.*). All activities under this part shall be accomplished in accordance with the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-3620), Executive Order 11246, and Executive Order 11063, as amended by Executive Order 12259, as applicable. The civil rights compliance requirements for RHS are in 7 CFR part 1901, subpart E.
§ 51.2003 Damage. *Damage* means any specific defect described in this section; or an equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, any other defect, or any combination of defects which materially detracts from the appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the filberts. The following specific defects shall be considered as damage: ( a ) Stains which are dark and materially affect the appearance of the individual shell.
( b ) Adhering husk when covering more than 5 percent of the surface of the shell in the aggregate.
( c ) Shriveling when the kernel is materially shrunken, wrinkled, leathery or tough.
( d ) Discoloration when the appearance of the kernel is materially affected by black color.
[Cite as State ex rel. Paige v. Corrigan, 129 Ohio St.3d 448, 2011-Ohio-4057.]

T HE S TATE EX REL . P AIGE , A PPELLANT , v. C ORRIGAN , J UDGE , A PPELLEE . [Cite as State ex rel. Paige v. Corrigan, 129 Ohio St.3d 448, 2011-Ohio-4057.] Mandamus to correct sentencing error — Adequate remedy by appeal to correct
sentencing error — Denial of writ affirmed.
(No. 2011-0478 — Submitted August 8, 2011 — Decided August 17, 2011.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 95864, 2011-Ohio-743.

__________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the c ourt of appeals denying the request of appellant, Arnold Paige, for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Pete r Corrigan, to vacate his sentence and resentence him. Paige “had an adequate remedy by way of direct appeal from his
sentence to raise his claim that he did not receive proper notification about postrelease control at his sentencing hearing.” Briseno v. Cook , 121 Ohio St.3d 38, 2009-Ohio-308, 901 N.E.2d 798, ¶ 1; Patterson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.
, 120 Ohio St.3d 311, 2008-Ohio-6147, 898 N.E.2d 950, ¶ 8. Paige also had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise hi s claims that his March 2004 sentencing entry contained incorrect terms of postrelease control. State ex rel. Tucker v.
Forchione , 128 Ohio St.3d 298, 2010-Ohio-6291, 943 N.E.2d 1006, ¶ 1; State ex rel. Pruitt v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas , 125 Ohio St.3d 402, 2010- Ohio-1808, 928 N.E.2d 722, ¶ 4. This disposition renders moot Judge Corrigan’s motion to strike Paige’s merit brief. Judgment affirmed.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , C UPP , and M C G EE B ROWN , JJ., concur.

__________________ Arnold Paige, pro se.

______________________
PROMISSORY NOTE

 

|   | $10,080,000.00 | August 1, 2001 |
|--------|----------------|----------------|

 

 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, SUNWOOD VILLAGE JOINT VENTURE, LIMITED PARTNERSHJP, a Nevada limited partnership (“Borrower”), whose address is c/o SPECS, Inc., Suite LH-06, 4200 Blue Ridge Boulevard, Kansas City, Missouri 64133, promises to pay to the order of FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association (“Lender”), at the office of Lender at 201 South Tryon Street, Suite 130, PMB Box #4, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202, or at such other place as Lender may designate to Borrower in writing from time to time, the principal sum of TEN MILLION EIGHTY THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($10,080,000.00) together with interest on so much thereof as is from time to time outstanding and unpaid, from the date of the advance of the principal evidenced hereby, at the rate of seven and one hundred twenty-five thousandths (7.125%) percent per annum (the “NoteRate”), in la* money of the United Stares of America, which shall at the time of payment be legal tender in payment of all debts and dues, public and private.

 

|   | ARTICLE 1 | TERMS AND CONDITIONS |
|--------|-----------|----------------------|

 

1.0      Computation of Interest. Interest shall be computed hereunder based on a 360-day year and paid for on the actual number of days elapsed for any whole or partial month in which interest is being calculated. Interest shall accrue from the date on which funds are advanced (regardless of the time of day) through and including the day on which funds are credited pursuant to Section 1.02 hereof.

 

1.02    Payment of Principal and Interest. Payments in federal funds immediately available in the place designated for payment received by Lender prior to 2:00 p.m. local time on a day on which Lender is open for business at said place of payment shall be credited prior to close of business, while other payments may, at the option of Lender, not be credited until immediately available to Lender in federal h d s at the place designated for payment prior to 2:00 p.m. local time at said place of payment on a day on which Lender is open for business. Such principal and interest shall be payable in equal consecutive monthly installments of $69,620.06 each, beginning on the first day of the second full calendar month following the date of this Note (or on the first day of the first full calendar month following the date hereof, inthe event the advance of the principle amount evidenced by this Note is the first day of a calendar month) (the “First Payment Date”), and continuing on the first day of each and every month thereafter (each, a “Payment Date”) through and including August 3,2006 (the “Maturity Date”), at 

 

----
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00453

- CV

Maurilio Navarro and Zulema Cavazos v. National General Insurance Co.
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 9 of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CL

- 23

- 2735

- I

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH CO URT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant s

. We further order this decision cert i fied below for observance. February 22, 2024
Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We have issued our reports dated March 4, 2011, with respect to the financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, included in the Annual Report of Kohlberg Capital Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Kohlberg Capital Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-152364, effective July 16, 2008 and File No. 333-151995, effective June 27, 2008). /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP New York, New York March 4, 2011
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to their knowledge:

(1)          this periodic report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced BioEnergy, LLC.

Dated:  May 15, 2007
|        | */s/Revis  L. Stephenson III* |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Revis L. Stephenson III       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   |                          |
|   | */s/ Richard Peterson*        |
|   | Richard Peterson              |
|   | Chief Financial Officer       |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TROY OLIVER,

Inmate No. 802668,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:19cv3520/LAC/EMT

K. RICE et al.,

Defendants.

___________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s

Report and Recommendation dated November 22, 2020 (ECF No. 46). Plaintiff

has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendations, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of February,2020.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:19cv3520/LAC/EMT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000755465
<NAME>                        Sandata, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1
<CURRENCY>                                               $

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              May-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                             605,889
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,519,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                       461,197
<INVENTORY>                                         45,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,685,638
<PP&E>                                          20,051,643
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,892,788
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,796,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,609,004
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             2,506
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,284,045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,796,525
<SALES>                                          4,429,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,571,416
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,459,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  51,265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     60,226
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50,998
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  9,268
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         9,268
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .00



</TABLE>
# 27.304 Procedures.

- 27.304-1 General. 
- 27.304-2 Contracts placed by or for other Government agencies. 
- 27.304-3 Subcontracts. 
- 27.304-4 Appeals. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 27.3 - Patent Rights under Government Contracts
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case Nos. 3:98cr47/LAC

 3:11cv597/LAC/EMT

JOHNNIE FRANK EMMANUEL

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated December 16, 2011 (doc. 232). The parties have been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of

objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(doc. 231) is summarily DISMISSED as untimely. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 3 day of January, 2012. rd

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19.1508 Contract clauses.

(a)The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.219-29, Notice of Set-Aside for, or SoleSource Award to, Economically Disadvantaged Women-owned Small Business Concerns, in

solicitations and contracts for acquisitions that are set aside or awarded on a sole-source basis to,

EDWOSB concerns under 19.1505(b) or 19.1506(a). This includes multiple-award contracts when

orders may be set aside for EDWOSB concerns as described in 8.405-5 and 16.505(b)(2)(i)(F) or

when orders may be issued directly to one EDWOSB contractor in accordance with 19.504(c)(1)(ii).

(b)The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.219-30, Notice of Set-Aside for, or SoleSource Award to, Women-Owned Small Business Concerns Eligible Under the Women-Owned Small

Business Program, in solicitations and contracts for acquisitions that are set aside or awarded on a

sole-source basis to WOSB concerns under 19.1505(c) or 19.1506(b). This includes multiple-award

contracts when orders may be set aside for WOSB concerns eligible under the WOSB Program as

described in 8.405-5 and 16.505(b)(2)(i)(F) or when orders may be issued directly to one WOSB

contractor in accordance with 19.504(c)(1)(ii).

(c)For use of clause 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting, see the prescription at 19.507(e).

(d)For use of clause 52.219-33, Nonmanufacturer Rule, see the prescription at 19.507(h).

Parent topic: Subpart 19.15 - Women-Owned Small Business Program.
#### § 48.6 Failure to account.

Any person receiving produce in interstate commerce or in the District of Columbia for or on behalf of another shall be considered to have violated the Act if, knowingly and with intent to defraud, he fails truly and correctly to account to the person from whom such produce was received.
# L_2021277EN.01002601.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 277/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 277/26

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/1259

of 26 July 2021

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Tuzséri alma’ (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Tuzséri alma’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Tuzséri alma’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Tuzséri alma’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Tuzséri alma’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Tuzséri alma’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 July 2021.

For the Commission

on behalf of the President

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 102, 24.3.2021, p. 21.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2464 

To revise a provision relating to a repayment obligation of the Fort McDowell 

Yavapai Nation under the Fort McDowell Indian Community Water 

Rights Settlement Act of 1990, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 28, 2006 

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. KYL) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To revise a provision relating to a repayment obligation 

of the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation under the Fort 

McDowell Indian Community Water Rights Settlement 

Act of 1990, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fort McDowell Indian 

5 Community Water Rights Settlement Revision Act of 

6 2006’’. 

7 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

8 In this Act: 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 2464 IS

1 (1) FORT MCDOWELL WATER RIGHTS SETTLE2 MENT ACT.—The term ‘‘Fort McDowell Water 

3 Rights Settlement Act’’ means the Fort McDowell 

4 Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Act of 

5 1990 (Public Law 101–628; 104 Stat. 4480). 

6 (2) NATION.—The term ‘‘Nation’’ means the 

7 Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, formerly known as 

8 the ‘‘Fort McDowell Indian Community’’. 

9 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

10 the Secretary of the Interior. 

11 SEC. 3. CANCELLATION OF REPAYMENT OBLIGATION. 

12 (a) CANCELLATION OF OBLIGATION.—The obligation 

13 of the Nation to repay the loan made under section 408(e) 

14 of the Fort McDowell Water Rights Settlement Act (104 

15 Stat. 4489) is cancelled. 

16 (b) EFFECT OF ACT.— 

17 (1) RIGHTS OF NATION UNDER FORT

18 MCDOWELL WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT.— 

19 (A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in 

20 subparagraph (B), nothing in this Act alters or 

21 affects any right of the Nation under the Fort 

22 McDowell Water Rights Settlement Act. 

23 (B) EXCEPTION.—The cancellation of the 

24 repayment obligation under subsection (a) shall 

25 be considered— 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 2464 IS

1 (i) to fulfill all conditions required to 

2 achieve a full and final settlement of all 

3 claims to water rights or injuries to water 

4 rights under the Fort McDowell Water 

5 Rights Settlement Act; and 

6 (ii) to relieve the Secretary of any re7 sponsibility or obligation to obtain mitiga8 tion property or develop additional farm 

9 acreage under section 410 the Fort 

10 McDowell Water Rights Settlement Act 

11 (104 Stat. 4490). 

12 (2) ELIGIBILITY FOR SERVICES AND BENE13 FITS.—Nothing in this Act alters or affects the eligi14 bility of the Nation or any member of the Nation for 

15 any service or benefit provided by the Federal Gov16 ernment to federally recognized Indian tribes or 

17 members of such Indian tribes. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### Helena Juergens, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

In a claim against the State of New York to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death due to the alleged failure of the State to properly supervise a parolee, claimant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims, dated February 22, 1979, which, after a trial, dismissed said claim. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Claimant failed to prove by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence that the State inadequately supervised a 14-year-old parolee in accordance with the risk to be perceived by said parolee’s prior pattern of behavior. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.