alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
     EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 CONSOLIDATED
     STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (SEE ANNUAL REPORT PAGE 45) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
     BALANCE SHEET (SEE ANNUAL REPORT PAGE 44). THIS INFORMATION IS QUALIFIED IN
     ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000796370
<NAME>                        United Asset Management Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         153,616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               335,096
<PP&E>                                          97,357
<DEPRECIATION>                                (55,209)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,439,511<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          251,781
<BONDS>                                        890,361<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           703
<OTHER-SE>                                     269,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,439,511
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               961,854
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  654,063
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               113,296<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                137,249
<INCOME-TAX>                                    58,742
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             78,507
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    78,507
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
        
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES $931,815 OF COST ASSIGNED TO CONTRACTS ACQUIRED, NET.
<F2> INCLUDES $687,521 IN SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND $202,840 IN SUBORDINATED
     NOTES PAYABLE.
<F3> REPRESENTS AMORTIZATION OF COST ASSIGNED TO CONTACTS ACQUIRED.
</FN>

</TABLE>
7.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes policies and procedures for-

(a) Developing acquisition plans;

(b) Determining whether to use commercial or Government resources for acquisition of supplies or

services;

(c) Deciding whether it is more economical to lease equipment rather than purchase it; and

(d) Determining whether functions are inherently governmental.

Parent topic: Part 7 - Acquisition Planning
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:94-cr-01009-MP-AK

CLAUDE LUIS DUBOC,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 980, Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255,

by Claude Luis Duboc. Defendant is represented by counsel, who has served the motion on

counsel for the Government.

 Pursuant to the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, the Court has reviewed the

motion, and the Government will be required to file an answer or other appropriate response. If

appropriate, the Government shall include the initial brief or other briefs from the direct appeal

and may rely on the statement of facts presented there. Defendant may respond to the

Government's arguments within the time set by this order, but he is not required to do so. 

Upon receipt of the Government's arguments and Defendant's response, if any, the Court

will review the file to determine whether an evidentiary hearing is required. If an evidentiary

hearing is not required, the Court will dispose of the petition as justice requires pursuant to §

2255 Rule 8(a).

The Government should also address the issue of timeliness raised by Duboc’s pro se

motion for extension of time to file. Doc. 973.

Case 1:94-cr-01009-MP-GRJ Document 999 Filed 07/15/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:94-cr-01009-MP-AK

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk shall furnish, by certified mail return receipt requested, a copy of this order

to the United States Attorney for this district, who shall file an answer or other appropriate

pleading by September 12, 2005.

2. If review of the PSR is necessary, the Probation Office shall allow counsel for the

Government to review the PSR upon request.

3. Defendant shall have until October 12, 2005, to file a response, if desired.. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of July, 2005.

s/ A. KORNBLUM ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:94-cr-01009-MP-GRJ Document 999 Filed 07/15/05 Page 2 of 2
Case 5:03-cr-00047-MCR   Document 183   Filed 04/17/15   Page 1 of 1
Subpart 4.20  Prohibition on Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Services Developed or Provided by Kaspersky Lab    **Parent topic:** Part 4 - Administrative and Information Matters4.2001 Definitions.       As used in this subpart—          *Kaspersky Lab covered article* means any hardware, software, or service that–(1)                            Is developed or provided by a Kaspersky Lab covered entity                                                                     (2)                            Includes any hardware, software, or service developed or provided in whole or in part by a Kaspersky Lab covered entity; or                                                                     (3)                            Contains components using any hardware or software developed in whole or in part by a Kaspersky Lab covered entity.                                                                                          *Kaspersky Lab covered entity* means–(1)                            Kaspersky Lab;                                                                     (2)                            Any successor entity to Kaspersky Lab, including any change in name, e.g., “Kaspersky”;                                                                     (3)                            Any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with Kaspersky Lab; or                                                                     (4)                            Any entity of which Kaspersky Lab has a majority ownership.4.2002 Prohibition.       Section 1634 of Division A of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Pub. L. 115-91) prohibits Government use on or after October 1, 2018, of any hardware, software, or services developed or provided, in whole or in part, by a covered entity. Contractors are prohibited from—                                       (a) Providing any Kaspersky Lab covered article that the Government will use on or after October 1, 2018; and                                          (b) Using any Kaspersky Lab covered article on or after October 1, 2018, in the development of data or deliverables first produced in the performance of the contract.4.2003 Notification.       When a contractor provides notification pursuant to 52.204-23, follow agency procedures.4.2004 Contract clause.       The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.204-23, Prohibition on Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Services Developed or Provided by Kaspersky Lab Covered Entities, in all solicitations and contracts.
<page>
                                                           Exhibit 32.2





                         NORDSTROM CREDIT, INC.

                        13531 EAST CALEY AVENUE

                       CENTENNIAL, COLORADO 80111

              CERTIFICATION OF VICE PRESIDENT AND TREASURER
                  REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


I, Michael G. Koppel, the Vice President and Treasurer of Nordstrom
Credit, Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that the Company's Amendment to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended October 30, 2004 (the "Report") filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission:


         -  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         -  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results
            of operations of the Company.


                                          /s/ Michael G. Koppel
                                          ----------------------
                                          Michael G. Koppel
                                          Vice President and Treasurer
                                          August 8, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Nordstrom Credit, Inc. and will be retained by
Nordstrom Credit, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|   | (1) | such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ JAMES G. RAKES                                           |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| James G. RakesChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
No. 89-6706.

#### Berbick *v.*Provident National Bank et al.

Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
16.205-2 Application.       A fixed-price contract with prospective price redetermination may be used in acquisitions of quantity production or services for which it is possible to negotiate a fair and reasonable firm fixed price for an initial period, but not for subsequent periods of contract performance.                                       (a)                    						            The initial period should be the longest period for which it is possible to negotiate a fair and reasonable firm fixed price. Each subsequent pricing period should be at least 12 months.                                          (b)                    						            The contract may provide for a ceiling price based on evaluation of the uncertainties involved in performance and their possible cost impact. This ceiling price should provide for assumption of a reasonable proportion of the risk by the contractor and, once established, may be adjusted only by operation of contract clauses providing for equitable adjustment or other revision of the contract price under stated circumstances.    **Parent topic:** 16.205 Fixed-price contracts with prospective price redetermination.
#### § 412.3 Index.

5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) requires that each agency publish, or otherwise make available, a current index of all materials available for public inspection and copying. RMA and FCIC will maintain a current index providing identifying information for the public as to any material issued, adopted, or promulgated by the Agency since July 4, 1967, and required by section 552(a)(2). Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act provisions, RMA and FCIC have determined that in view of the small number of public requests for such index, publication of such an index would be unnecessary and impracticable. Copies of the index will be available upon request in person or by mail at the address stated in § 412.2(b).
SCPW-15-0000101

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

JONATHAN PAUL BALDWIN; LYNN ANN LINDELL BALDWIN; and MOANA

PROPERTY LLC, Petitioners,

vs.

THE HONORABLE RHONDA I.L. LOO, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

SECOND CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent Judge, 

and

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE ON BEHALF OF THE HOLDERS OF

THE HARBOR VIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST MORTGAGE LOAN PASS-THROUGH

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-12; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION

SYSTEMS INC., SOLELY AS NOMINEE FOR COUNTRYWIDE BANK, N.A.; DANE

S. FIELD, BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE OF THE MORTGAGE STORES, INC.; and

MOANA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Respondents. 

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(Civil No. 13-1-0907(1))

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Petitioners Jonathan Paul

Baldwin, Lynn Ann Lindell Baldwin, and Moana Property LLC’s

petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on February 27, 2015, the

documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and

the record, it appears that Petitioners fail to demonstrate that

they have a clear and indisputable right to relief or that they

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-15-0000101

25-MAR-2015

10:15 AM
lack alternative means to seek relief. Petitioners further fail

to demonstrate that the Respondent Judge exceeded her

jurisdiction, committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of

discretion, or refused to act on a subject properly before the

court under circumstances in which she has a legal duty to act. 

Petitioners, therefore, are not entitled to a writ of mandamus. 

See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999)

(a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not

issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable

right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress

adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action);

Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 59 Haw. 237, 241, 580 P.2d

58, 62 (1978) (a writ of mandamus is not intended to supersede

the legal discretionary authority of the trial courts, cure a

mere legal error, or serve as a legal remedy in lieu of normal

appellate procedure; rather, it is meant to restrain a judge of

an inferior court who has exceeded his or her jurisdiction, has

committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or has

refused to act on a subject properly before the court under

circumstances in which he or she has a legal duty to act). 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus is denied. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 25, 2015. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6693** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v.
EUGENE BARNES , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Clarksburg

. Irene M. Keeley , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cr - 00023

- IMK

- 1 )

Submitted : July 29, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Eugene Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this c ircuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eugene Barnes appeals the district court ’ s order denying
his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of

sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Barnes , No. 1:11

- cr - 00023

- IMK

1 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 25, 2015) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before th is court and argument would not a id the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------

 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-K/A (the "Report") of ANTs software
inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the period ended December 31,
2008:

     1. Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not
to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be "filed" for any
purpose whatsoever.

Date:  May 22, 2009

                                        /s/ Joseph Kozak
                                        ----------------
                                        Joseph Kozak, Chief Executive Officer
                                        and President

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be
retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Financial Data Statement for Adelphia Communications Corp.
for the Year ended March 31, 1997
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000796486
<NAME> ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          61,539
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,692<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         659,575<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,643,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,544,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           270
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,254,151)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,643,826
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               472,778
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  354,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             240,692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (119,290)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (358)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (118,932)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (11,710)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (130,642)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.94)
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are recorded net of allowance
<F2>PP&E recorded net of depreciation
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unitil Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned Robert G. Schoenberger, Chief Executive Officer and President, Mark H. Collin, Chief Financial
Officer and Laurence M. Brock, Chief Accounting Officer, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           |  |                                       |  |               
|-------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|Signature                  |  | Capacity                              |  | Date          
|                           |  |                                      
|/s/ Robert G. Schoenberger |  |                                       |  |               
|Robert G. Schoenberger     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President |  | April 24, 2008
|                           |  |                                      
|/s/ Mark H. Collin         |  |                                       |  |               
|Mark H. Collin             |  | Chief Financial Officer               |  | April 24, 2008
|                           |  |                                      
|/s/ Laurence M. Brock      |  |                                       |  |               
|Laurence M. Brock          |  | Chief Accounting Officer              |  | April 24, 2008
118 STAT. 1394 PUBLIC LAW 108–351—OCT. 21, 2004

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1791:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 108–272 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Sept. 15, considered and passed Senate.

Oct. 6, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 108–351

108th Congress

An Act

To amend the Lease Lot Conveyance Act of 2002 to provide that the amounts

received by the United States under that Act shall be deposited in the reclamation

fund, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEASE LOT CONVEYANCE.

Section 4(b) of the Lease Lot Conveyance Act of 2002 (116

Stat. 2879) is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘As consideration’’ and inserting the following:

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—As consideration’’; and

(2) by adding at the end the following:

‘‘(2) USE.—Amounts received under paragraph (1) shall

be—

‘‘(A) deposited by the Secretary, on behalf of the Rio

Grande Project, in the reclamation fund established under

the first section of the Act of June 17, 1902 (43 U.S.C.

391); and

‘‘(B) made immediately available to the Irrigation Districts, to be credited in accordance with section 4(I) of

the Act of December 5, 1924 (43 U.S.C. 501).’’.

Approved October 21, 2004.

Oct. 21, 2004

[S. 1791]