FORM 10-QSB--QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
                      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                        QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT


                    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
                            Washington, D.C.  20549


                                  FORM 10-QSB


[X]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
     ACT OF 1934


                 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 1999


[ ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
     EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

               For the transition period from_________to_________

                         Commission file number 0-14099


                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI
       (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)


         California                                            94-2940204
(State or other jurisdiction of                             (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                            Identification No.)

                        55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                          (Issuer's telephone number)



Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  X  No
                         
                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

a)
                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                  (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                 March 31, 1999





Assets

 Cash and cash equivalents                                    $ 1,937

 Receivables and deposits                                         173

 Restricted escrows                                                90

 Other assets                                                      59

 Investment property:

   Land                                           $   916

   Buildings and personal property                  9,199

                                                   10,115

   Less accumulated depreciation                   (4,079)      6,036


                                                              $ 8,295


Liabilities and Partners' Capital (Deficit)


Liabilities

 Accounts payable                                             $    12

 Tenant security deposit liabilities                               68

 Accrued property taxes                                            92

 Other liabilities                                                 77

 Mortgage note payable                                          4,324


Partners' Capital (Deficit)

 General partner                                  $     1

 Special limited partners'                            (41)

 Limited partners (181,300 units issued

   and outstanding)                                 3,762        3,722


                                                               $ 8,295

          See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

b)
                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI

                     CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                  (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)





                                                          Three Months Ended

                                                                March 31,

                                                            1999         1998

Revenues:

  Rental income                                           $  426       $  373

  Other income                                                35           60

     Total revenues                                          461          433


Expenses:

  Operating                                                  191          207

  General and administrative                                  30           33

  Depreciation                                                90           87

  Interest                                                   110          110

  Property taxes                                              26           30

     Total expenses                                          447          467


Net income (loss)                                         $   14       $  (34)


Net income (loss) allocated to general partner (0.2%)     $   --       $   --

Net income (loss) allocated to limited

  partners (99.8%)                                            14          (34)


                                                          $   14       $  (34)


Net income (loss) per limited partnership unit            $  .08       $ (.19)


Distribution per limited partnership unit                 $   --       $ 2.76

          See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

c)
                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI

        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
                                  (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)





                                   Limited            Special

                                 Partnership General  Limited  Limited

                                    Units    Partner  Partners Partners  Total


Original capital contributions    181,808    $     1  $    --  $45,452  $45,453


Partners' capital (deficit)

 at December 31, 1998             181,300    $     1  $   (43) $ 3,750  $ 3,708


Amortization of timing

 difference                            --         --        2       (2)      --


Net income for the three months

 ended March 31, 1999                  --         --       --       14       14

Partners' capital (deficit)

 at March 31, 1999                181,300    $     1  $   (41) $ 3,762  $ 3,722

          See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

d)
                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI

                     CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                  (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)


                                                           Three Months Ended

                                                                March 31,

                                                             1999       1998

Cash flows from operating activities:

  Net income (loss)                                       $   14     $  (34)

  Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net

    cash provided by operating activities:

    Depreciation                                              90         87

    Amortization of loan costs                                 6          6

    Changes in accounts:

      Receivables and deposits                                85        169

      Other assets                                            (1)         5

      Accounts payable                                         1         21

      Tenant security deposit liabilities                     --          9

      Accrued taxes                                          (26)       (28)

      Other liabilities                                       (1)       (18)

        Net cash provided by operating activities            168        217


Cash flows from investing activities:

  Property improvements and replacements                     (54)       (20)

  Proceeds from sale of investments                           --        302

  Net deposits to restricted escrows                         (22)       (22)


        Net cash (used in) provided by

           investing activities                              (76)       260


Cash flows from financing activities:

  Payments on mortgage notes payable                         (17)       (16)

  Distribution paid to limited partners                       --       (500)


        Net cash used in financing activities                (17)      (516)


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents          75        (39)


Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period           1,862      1,949


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                $1,937     $1,910


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

  Cash paid for interest                                  $  103     $  105

          See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

e)
                       CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                  (Unaudited)


NOTE A - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Consolidated
Capital Properties VI (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Item 310(b) of
Regulation S-B. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of ConCap Equities, Inc. ("CEI" or the
"General Partner"), all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating
results for the three month period ended March 31, 1999, are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 1999.  For further information, refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's annual report on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998.

Principles of Consolidation

The Partnership's financial statements include the accounts of Colony of
Springdale Associates, Ltd. ("Colony Associates"), which holds fee title to the
Colony of Springdale Apartments.  The results of its operations are included in
the Partnership's consolidated financial statements.  All intercompany
transactions between the Partnership and Colony Associates have been eliminated.

NOTE B - TRANSFER OF CONTROL

Pursuant to a series of transactions which closed on October 1, 1998 and
February 26, 1999, Insignia Financial Group, Inc. and Insignia Properties Trust
merged into Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly
traded real estate investment trust, with AIMCO being the surviving corporation
(the "Insignia Merger").  As a result, AIMCO acquired 100% ownership interest in
the General Partner. The General Partner does not believe that this transaction
will have a material effect on the affairs and operations of the Partnership.

NOTE C - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities.
The Partnership Agreement provides for payments to affiliates for services and
the reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership. The following expenses were paid or accrued to an affiliate of the
General Partner during the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998:

                                                         1999      1998
                                                         (in thousands)
Property management fees
   (included in operating expenses)                       $22       $20

Reimbursements for services of affiliates
   (included in investment property and operating
   and general and administrative expenses ) (1)           14        20

(1)Included in "reimbursements for services of affiliates" is approximately
   $1,000, of reimbursements for construction oversight costs for the three
   months ended March 31, 1998.  No such fees were paid in 1999.

During the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, affiliates of the General
Partner were entitled to receive 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership's
property as compensation for providing property management services.  The
Partnership paid to such affiliates $22,000 and $20,000 for each of the three
months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.

An affiliate of the Managing General Partner received reimbursement of
accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $14,000 and
$20,000 for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.

NOTE D - COMMITMENT

The Partnership is required to maintain working capital reserves for
contingencies of not less than 5% of Net Invested Capital as defined in the
Partnership Agreement. In the event expenditures are made from these reserves,
operating revenue shall be allocated to such reserves to the extent necessary to
maintain the foregoing level. Reserves, consisting of cash and cash equivalents,
tenant security deposits, investments, and reserves for capital improvements and
contingencies, totaling approximately $2,182,000 exceed the reserve requirement
of approximately $2,070,000 at March 31, 1999.

NOTE E - CHANGE IN STATUS OF NON-CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

During the year ended December 31, 1991, the Partnership Agreement was amended
to convert the General Partner interests held by the non-corporate General
Partner, Consolidated Capital Group II ("CCG"), to that of special limited
partners ("Special Limited Partners").  The Special Limited Partners do not have
a vote and do not have any of the other rights of a Limited Partner except the
right to inspect the Partnership's books and records; however, the Special
Limited Partners retained the economic interest in the Partnership which they
previously owned as general partner.

CEI became the sole general partner of the Partnership effective December 31,
1991. In connection with CCG's conversion, a special allocation of gross income
was made to the Special Limited Partners in order to eliminate its tax basis
negative capital account.

After the conversion, the various Special Limited Partners transferred portions
of their interests to CEI so that CEI now holds a .2% interest in all allocable
items of income, loss and distribution.  The differences between the Special
Limited Partners' capital accounts for financial statement and tax reporting
purposes are being amortized to the Limited Partners' capital accounts as the
components of the timing differences which created the balance reverse.

NOTE F - DISTRIBUTIONS

In the first quarter of 1998, the Partnership declared and paid a cash
distribution to the limited partners in the amount of $500,000.  The
distribution was from surplus funds from the sale of Celina Plaza in October
1997.  No distributions were paid in the first quarter of 1999.

NOTE G - SEGMENT REPORTING

Description of the types of products and services from which the reportable
segment derives its revenues:

The Partnership has one reportable segment: residential properties.  The
Partnership's residential property segment consists of one apartment complex in
Ohio.  The Partnership rents apartment units to people for terms that are
typically twelve months or less.
   

Measurement of segment profit or loss:

The Partnership evaluates performance based on net income.  The accounting
policies of the reportable segment are the same as those of the Partnership as
described in the Partnership's annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 1998.

Factors management used to identify the enterprise's reportable segment:

Segment information for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998 (in
thousands) is shown in the tables below.  The "Other" column includes
partnership administration related items and income and expense not allocated to
the reportable segment.




                1999                 Residential      Other         Totals

Rental income                          $    426       $     --    $    426
Other income                                 18             17          35
Interest expense                            110             --         110
Depreciation                                 90             --          90
General and administrative expense           --             30          30
Segment profit (loss)                        30            (16)         14
Total assets                              6,094          2,201       8,295
Capital expenditures for investment
  property                                   54             --          54

                1998                 Residential      Other         Totals

Rental income                          $    373       $     --    $    373
Other income                                19              41          60
Interest expense                           110              --         110
Depreciation                                87              --          87
General and administrative expense          --              33          33
Segment (loss) profit                      (39)              5         (34)
Total assets                             6,261           2,193       8 454
Capital expenditures for investment
  properties                                20              --          20

NOTE H - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership commenced an action entitled Rosalie Nuanes, et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Mateo.  The plaintiffs named as defendants, among others,
the Partnership, the General Partner and several of their affiliated
partnerships and corporate entities. The complaint purports to assert claims on
behalf of a class of limited partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of
limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are named as nominal
defendants, challenging the acquisition by Insignia and entities which were, at
the time, affiliates of Insignia ("Insignia Affiliates") of interests in certain
general partner entities, past tender offers by Insignia Affiliates as well as a
recently announced agreement between Insignia and AIMCO.  The complaint seeks
monetary damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the
Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General Partner filed a motion seeking
dismissal of the action.  In lieu of responding to the motion, the plaintiffs
have filed an amended complaint.  The General Partner has filed demurrers to the
amended complaint which were heard during February 1999.  No ruling on such
demurrers has been received.  The General Partner does not anticipate that costs
associated with this case, if any, will be material to the Partnership's overall
operations.

The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.


ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The matters discussed in this Form 10-QSB contain certain forward-looking
statements and involve risks and uncertainties (including changing market
conditions, competitive and regulatory matters, etc.) detailed in the disclosure
contained in this Form 10-QSB and the other filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission made by the Partnership from time to time.  The discussion
of the Partnership's business and results of operations, including forward-
looking statements pertaining to such matters, does not take into account the
effects of any changes to the Partnership's business and results of operation.
Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those projected in the
forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those
identified herein.

The Partnership's investment property consists of one apartment complex, Colony
of Springdale Apartments, located in Springdale, Ohio. The average occupancy for
the three month periods ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, was 94% and 90%,
respectively. The Partnership attributes the improvement in occupancy to the
improved curbside appeal of the property.

Results of Operations

The Partnership realized net income of approximately $14,000 compared to a net
loss of approximately $34,000 for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and
1998, respectively.  This increase in net income is primarily due to the
increase in rental income and the decrease in operating expenses.  The increase
in rental income resulted from an increase in occupancy, as noted above.  This
was partially offset by the decrease in other income resulting from low cash
balances in 1999.  The decrease in operating expenses is primarily due to a
decrease in courtesy patrol expenses in 1999.  Included in general and
administrative expenses at both March 31, 1999 and 1998 are management
reimbursements to the General Partner allowed under the Partnership Agreement.
In addition, costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with
investors and regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the
Partnership agreement are also included.

As part of the ongoing business plan of the Partnership, the General Partner
monitors the rental market environment of its investment property to assess the
feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and
protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses.  As part of this plan,
the General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of
inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a
high overall occupancy level. However, due to changing market conditions, which
can result in the use of rental concessions and rental reductions to offset
softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the General Partner will
be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 1999, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $1,937,000 as compared to approximately $1,910,000 at March 31,
1998.  For the three months ended March 31, 1999 cash and cash equivalents
increased by approximately $75,000 from the Partnership's year ended December
31, 1998.  The increase in cash and cash equivalents is due to approximately
$168,000 of cash provided by operating activities which was partially offset by
approximately $76,000 of cash used in investing activities and approximately
$17,000 of cash used in financing activities.  Cash used in investing activities
consisted of deposits to restricted escrows held by the mortgage lender and
property improvements and replacements.  Cash used in financing activities
consisted of principal payments made on the mortgage encumbering the
Partnership's property   The Partnership invests its working capital reserves in
a money market account.

The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital
expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical asset
and other operating needs of the Registrant and to comply with Federal, state,
and local legal and regulatory requirements.  Capital improvements planned for
the Partnership's property is discussed below.

During the three month period ended March 31, 1999, the Partnership completed
approximately $54,000 of capital improvements at the property.  These
improvements consisted of flooring and interior and exterior improvements.
These improvements were funded from operating cash flow.  Based on a report
received from an independent third party consultant analyzing necessary exterior
improvements and estimates made by the General Partner on interior improvements,
it is estimated that the property requires approximately $344,000 of capital
improvements over the near term.  Capital improvements planned for 1999 consist
of, but are not limited to, appliances, landscaping and outdoor lighting,
asphalt repairs, roof replacement, and carpeting. These improvements are
expected to cost approximately $359,000.

The additional capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from operations or from Partnership reserves.  To the extent that such budgeted
capital improvements are completed, the Registrant's distributable cash flow, if
any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The Partnership is required to maintain working capital reserves for
contingencies of not less than 5% of Net Invested Capital as defined in the
Partnership Agreement.  In the event expenditures are made from these reserves,
operating revenue shall be allocated to such reserves to the extent necessary to
maintain the foregoing level. Reserves, consisting of cash and cash equivalents,
tenant security deposits, investments and reserves for capital improvements and
contingencies totaling approximately $2,182,000 are more than the reserve
requirement of approximately $2,070,000 at March 31, 1999.

The Partnership's current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs (exclusive of capital improvements) of the Partnership.  The mortgage
indebtedness of approximately $4,324,000 is amortized over 300 months with a
balloon payment of approximately $4,152,000 due on May 31, 2001.  The General
Partner will attempt to refinance such indebtedness or sell the property prior
to such maturity date.  If the property cannot be refinanced or sold for a
sufficient amount, the Partnership will risk losing such property through
foreclosure.

A cash distribution from surplus cash of approximately $500,000 from proceeds of
the sale of Celina Plaza in 1997 was made during the year ended December 31,
1998. No distributions were made in 1999.  The Partnership's distribution policy
is reviewed on a quarterly basis.  Future cash distributions will depend on the
levels of net cash generated from operations, the availability of cash reserves,
and the timing of debt maturities, refinancings and/or property sale.  There can
be no assurance, however, that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds
from operations after required capital expenditures to permit further
distributions to its partners in 1999 or subsequent periods.


Year 2000 Compliance

General Description of the Year 2000 Issue and the Nature and Effects of the
Year 2000 on Information Technology (IT) and Non-IT Systems

The Year 2000 issue is the result of computer programs being written using two
digits rather than four digits to define the applicable year.  The Partnership
is dependent upon the General Partner and its affiliates for management and
administrative services ("Managing Agent").  Any of the computer programs or
hardware that have date-sensitive software or embedded chips may recognize a
date using "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000.  This could result
in a system failure or miscalculations causing disruptions of operations,
including, among other things, a temporary inability to process transactions,
send invoices, or engage in similar normal business activities.

Over the past two years, the Managing Agent has determined that it will be
required to modify or replace significant portions of its software and certain
hardware so that those systems will properly utilize dates beyond December 31,
1999.  The Managing Agent presently believes that with modifications or
replacements of existing software and certain hardware, the Year 2000 issue can
be mitigated.  However, if such modifications and replacements are not made, or
not completed in time, the Year 2000 issue could have a material impact on the
operations of the Partnership.

The Managing Agent's plan to resolve Year 2000 issues involves four phases:
assessment, remediation, testing, and implementation.  To date, the Managing
Agent has fully completed its assessment of all the information systems that
could be significantly affected by the Year 2000, and has begun the remediation,
testing and implementation phases on both hardware and software systems.
Assessments are continuing in regards to embedded systems.  The status of each
is detailed below.

Status of Progress in Becoming Year 2000 Compliant, Including Timetable for
Completion of Each Remaining Phase

Computer Hardware:

During 1997 and 1998, the Managing Agent identified all of the computer systems
at risk and formulated a plan to repair or replace each of the affected systems.
In August 1998, the mainframe system used by the Managing Agent became fully
functional. In addition to the mainframe, PC-based network servers, routers and
desktop PCs were analyzed for compliance.  The Managing Agent has begun to
replace each of the non-compliant network connections and desktop PCs and, as of
March 31, 1999, had completed approximately 75% of this effort.

The total cost to the Managing Agent to replace the PC-based network servers,
routers and desktop PCs is expected to be approximately $1.5 million of which
$1.3 million has been incurred to date.  The remaining network connections and
desktop PCs are expected to be upgraded to Year 2000 compliant systems by July
31, 1999.

Computer Software:

The Managing Agent utilizes a combination of off-the-shelf, commercially
available software programs as well as custom-written programs that are designed
to fit specific needs.  Both of these types of programs were studied, and
implementation plans written and executed with the intent of repairing or
replacing any non-compliant software programs.


During 1998, the Managing Agent began converting the existing property
management and rent collection systems to its management properties Year 2000
compliant systems.  The estimated additional costs to convert such systems at
all properties, is $200,000, and the implementation and the testing process is
expected to be completed by July 31, 1999.

The final software area is the office software and server operating systems.
The Managing Agent has upgraded all non-compliant office software systems on
each PC and has upgraded 80% of the server operating systems.  The remaining
server operating systems are planned to be upgraded to be Year 2000 compliant by
July 31, 1999.

Operating Equipment:

The Managing Agent has operating equipment, primarily at the property sites,
which needed to be evaluated for Year 2000 compliance.  In September 1997, the
Managing Agent began taking a census and inventory of embedded systems
(including those devices that use time to control systems and machines at
specific properties, for example elevators, heating, ventilating, and air
conditioning systems, security and alarm systems, etc.).

The Managing Agent has chosen to focus its attention mainly upon security
systems, elevators, heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems, telephone
systems and switches, and sprinkler systems.  While this area is the most
difficult to fully research adequately, management has not yet found any major
non-compliance issues that put the Managing Agent at risk financially or
operationally.  The Managing Agent intends to have a third-party conduct an
audit of these systems and report their findings by July 31, 1999.


Any of the above operating equipment that has been found to be non-compliant to
date has been replaced or repaired.  To date, these have consisted only of
security systems and phone systems.  As of March 31, 1999 the Managing Agent has
evaluated approximately 86% of the operating equipment for the Year 2000
compliance.

The total cost incurred for all properties managed by the Managing Agent as of
March 31, 1999 to replace or repair the operating equipment was approximately
$400,000. The Managing Agent estimates the cost to replace or repair any
remaining operating equipment is approximately $325,000, which is expected to be
completed by August 30, 1999.

The Managing Agent continues to have "awareness campaigns" throughout the
organization designed to raise awareness and report any possible compliance
issues regarding operating equipment within its enterprise.

Nature and Level of Importance of Third Parties and Their Exposure to the Year
2000

The Managing Agent continues to conduct surveys of its banking and other vendor
relationships to assess risks regarding their Year 2000 readiness.  The Managing
Agent has banking relationships with three major financial institutions, all of
which have indicated their compliance efforts will be complete before May 1999.
The Managing Agent has updated data transmission standards with two of the three
financial institutions.  The Managing Agent's contingency plan in this regard is
to move accounts from any institution that cannot be certified Year 2000
compliant by June 1, 1999.

The Partnership does not rely heavily on any single vendor for goods and
services, and does not have significant suppliers and subcontractors who share
information systems (external agent).  To date the Partnership is not aware of
any external agent with a Year 2000 compliance issue that would materially
impact the Partnership's results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources.
However, the Partnership has no means of ensuring that external agents will be
Year 2000 compliant.

The Managing Agent does not believe that the inability of external agents to
complete their Year 2000 remediation process in a timely manner will have a
material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the
Partnership.  However, the effect of non-compliance by external agents is not
readily determinable.

Costs to Address Year 2000

The total cost of the Year 2000 project to the Managing Agent is estimated at
$3.5 million and is being funded from operating cash flows.  To date, the
Managing Agent has incurred approximately $2.8 million ($0.6 million expensed
and $2.2 million capitalized for new systems and equipment) related to all
phases of the Year 2000 project.  Of the total remaining project costs,
approximately $0.5 million is attributable to the purchase of new software and
operating equipment, which will be capitalized.  The remaining $0.2 million
relates to repair of hardware and software and will be expensed as incurred.
The Partnership's portion of these costs are not material.

Risks Associated with the Year 2000

The Managing Agent believes it has an effective program in place to resolve the
Year 2000 issue in a timely manner.  As noted above, the Managing Agent has not
yet completed all necessary phases of the Year 2000 program.  In the event that
the Managing Agent does not complete any additional phases, certain worst case
scenarios could occur.  The worst case scenarios could include elevators,
security and heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems that read
incorrect dates and operate with incorrect schedules (e.g., elevators will
operate on Monday as if it were Sunday).  Although such a change would be
annoying to residents, it is not business critical.

In addition, disruptions in the economy generally resulting from Year 2000
issues could also adversely affect the Partnership.  The Partnership could be
subject to litigation for, among other things, computer system failures,
equipment shutdowns or failure to properly date business records.  The amount of
potential liability and lost revenue cannot be reasonably estimated at this
time.

Contingency Plans Associated with the Year 2000

The Managing Agent has contingency plans for certain critical applications and
is working on such plans for others.  These contingency plans involve, among
other actions, manual workarounds and selecting new relationships for such
activities as banking relationships and elevator operating systems.


                          PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership commenced an action entitled Rosalie Nuanes, et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Mateo.  The plaintiffs named as defendants, among others,
the Partnership, the General Partner and several of their affiliated
partnerships and corporate entities. The complaint purports to assert claims on
behalf of a class of limited partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of
limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are named as nominal
defendants, challenging the acquisition by Insignia and entities which were, at
the time, affiliates of Insignia ("Insignia Affiliates") of interests in certain
general partner entities, past tender offers by Insignia Affiliates as well as a
recently announced agreement between Insignia and AIMCO.  The complaint seeks
monetary damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the
Partnership.  On June 25, 1998, the General Partner filed a motion seeking
dismissal of the action.  In lieu of responding to the motion, the plaintiffs
have filed an amended complaint.  The General Partner has filed demurrers to the
amended complaint which were heard during February 1999.  No ruling on such
demurrers has been received.  The General Partner does not anticipate that costs
associated with this case, if any, will be material to the Partnership's overall
operations.


ITEM 6.   EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)Exhibits:


   Exhibit 27, Financial Data Schedule, is filed as an exhibit to this report.

(b)Reports on Form 8-K:

   None filed during the quarter ended March 31, 1999.


                                   SIGNATURES


In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.


                                        CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES VI

                                        By: CONCAP EQUITIES, INC.
                                            General Partner


                                        By: /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                            Patrick J. Foye
                                            Executive Vice President

                                        By: /s/Timothy R. Garrick
                                            Timothy R. Garrick
                                            Vice President - Accounting

                                        Date: