74024 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 30, 2010 / Notices 

the responsible program secretarial officer to 

develop a formal plan to meet this 

requirement within a reasonable timeframe. 

3. Revise DOE Standard 3009–94 to 

identify clearly and unambiguously the 

requirements that must be met to 

demonstrate that an adequate level of 

protection for the public and workers is 

provided through a DSA. This should be 

accomplished, at a minimum, by: 

a. Clearly defining methodologies and 

providing acceptability criteria for controls, 

parameters, processes, analytical tools, and 

other data that should be used in preparation 

of a DSA, 

b. Delineating the criteria to be met for 

identification and analyses of an adequate set 

of Design Basis Accidents (for new facilities), 

or Evaluation Basis Accidents (for existing 

facilities), 

c. Providing criteria that must be met by 

the safety-class SSCs to (i) mitigate the 

consequences to a fraction of the Evaluation 

Guideline, or (ii) prevent the events by 

demonstrating an acceptable reliability for 

the preventive features, and 

d. Establishing a process and path forward 

to meeting (a) through (c) above through 

compensatory measures and planned 

improvements if the DSA cannot demonstrate 

compliance. 

4. Amend 10 CFR Part 830 by 

incorporating the revised version of DOE 

Standard 3009–94 into the text as a 

requirement, instead of as a safe harbor cited 

in Table 2. 

5. Formally establish the minimum criteria 

and requirements that govern federal 

approval of a DSA, by revision to DOE 

Standard 1104–2009 and other appropriate 

documents. The criteria and requirements 

should include: 

a. The authorities that can be delegated, the 

required training and qualification of the 

approval authority, and the boundaries and 

limitations of the approval authority’s 

responsibilities, 

b. Actions to be taken if conditions are 

beyond the delegated approval authority’s 

specified boundaries or limitations, 

c. The organization or the individual who 

can approve a DSA that is beyond the 

delegated approval authority’s specified 

boundaries or limitations, 

d. The regulatory process that must be 

followed if conditions are beyond the 

delegated approval authority’s specified 

boundaries or limitations, and any 

compensatory actions to be taken, and 

e. The criteria an approval authority must 

use to quantify the acceptance of risk for 

continued operations when offsite dose 

consequences approach the Evaluation 

Guideline. 

6. Formally designate the responsible 

organization and identify the processes for 

performing oversight to ensure that the 

responsibilities identified in Item 5 above are 

fully implemented. 

Peter S. Winokur, Ph.D., Chairman 

[FR Doc. 2010–30004 Filed 11–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3670–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Notice of Submission for OMB Review 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

ACTION: Comment Request. 

SUMMARY: The Director, Information 

Collection Clearance Division, 

Regulatory Information Management 

Services, Office of Management invites 

comments on the submission for OMB 

review as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13). 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before 

December 30, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments should 

be addressed to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention: Education Desk Officer, 

Office of Management and Budget, 725 

17th Street, NW., Room 10222, New 

Executive Office Building, Washington, 

DC 20503, be faxed to (202) 395–5806 

or e-mailed to 

oira_submission@omb.eop.gov with a 

cc: to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please note 

that written comments received in 

response to this notice will be 

considered public records. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) requires that 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) provide interested Federal 

agencies and the public an early 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection requests. The OMB is 

particularly interested in comments 

which: (1) Evaluate whether the 

proposed collection of information is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; (2) Evaluate the 

accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information, including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (4) Minimize the burden 

of the collection of information on those 

who are to respond, including through 

the use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Dated: November 24, 2010. 

Darrin A. King, 

Director, Information Collection Clearance 

Division Regulatory Information Management 

Services Office of Management. 

Institute of Education Sciences 

Type of Review: New. 

Title of Collection: Study of Schools 

Targeted for Improvement Using Title I 

Section 1003(g) Funds Provided Under 

the American Recovery and 

Reinvestment Act (Study of School 

Turnaround). 

OMB Control Number: Pending. 

Agency Form Number(s): N/A. 

Frequency of Responses: Annually. 

Affected Public: Not-for-profit 

institutions; State, Local, or Tribal 

Government, State Educational 

Agencies, Local Educational Agencies. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Responses: 8,463. 

Total Estimated Annual Burden 

Hours: 3,803. 

Abstract: The purpose of the Study of 

School Turnaround is to document over 

time the intervention models, 

approaches, and strategies adopted and 

implemented by a subset of 60 schools 

receiving federal School Improvement 

Grants (SIG), Title I Section 1003(g), 

provided under the American Recovery 

and Reinvestment Act. To this end, the 

evaluation will employ multiple data 

collection strategies, including 

telephone interviews with school 

principals, district administrators and 

state officials; site visits to case study 

schools; teacher surveys; and collection 

of fiscal data. Specifically, the study 

will conduct telephone interviews with 

building principals and will administer 

teacher surveys in 60 schools, over three 

years. This set of 60 SIG-awarded 

schools will include three nested 

subsamples: One set of 25 schools in 

which the study team will conduct indepth case studies over three years, and 

two sets of 10 ‘‘special topics’’ schools in 

which the study team will collect 

interview, focus group, and survey data 

on topics of policy interest over a period 

of two years. The study will produce 

annual reports, accompanied by more 

focused research briefs on special topics 

related to the change process in the 

nation’s lowest-performing schools. 

Requests for copies of the information 

collection submission for OMB review 

may be accessed from the RegInfo.gov 

Web site at http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain or from the 

Department’s Web site at http:// 

edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the 

‘‘Browse Pending Collections’’ link and 

by clicking on link number 4446. When 

you access the information collection, 

click on ‘‘Download Attachments ’’ to 

view. Written requests for information 

should be addressed to U.S. Department 

of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, 

SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537. 

Requests may also be electronically 

mailed to the Internet address 

ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202– 

401–0920. Please specify the complete 

title of the information collection and 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 30, 2010 / Notices 74025 

OMB Control Number when making 

your request. 

Individuals who use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Information 

Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877– 

8339. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30128 Filed 11–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Notice of Submission for OMB Review 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

ACTION: Comment Request. 

SUMMARY: The Director, Information 

Collection Clearance Division, 

Regulatory Information Management 

Services, Office of Management invites 

comments on the submission for OMB 

review as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13). 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before 

December 30, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments should 

be addressed to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention: Education Desk Officer, 

Office of Management and Budget, 

725 17th Street, NW., Room 10222, 

New Executive Office Building, 

Washington, DC 20503, be faxed to (202) 

395–5806 or e-mailed to 

oira_submission@omb.eop.gov with a 

cc: to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please note 

that written comments received in 

response to this notice will be 

considered public records. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) provide interested 

Federal agencies and the public an early 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection requests. The OMB is 

particularly interested in comments 

which: (1) Evaluate whether the 

proposed collection of information is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; (2) Evaluate the 

accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information, including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (4) Minimize the burden 

of the collection of information on those 

who are to respond, including through 

the use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Dated: November 23, 2010. 

Darrin A. King, 

Director Information Collection Clearance 

Division, Regulatory Information 

Management Services Office of Management. 

Institute of Education Sciences 

Type of Review: New. 

Title of Collection: Integrated 

Evaluation of ARRA Funding, 

Implementation and Outcomes, 

Recruitment Package. 

OMB Control Number: 1850–NEW. 

Agency Form Number(s): N/A. 

Frequency of Responses: Once. 

Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal 

Government, State Educational 

Agencies or Local Educational Agencies. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Responses: 5,551. 

Total Estimated Annual Burden 

Hours: 1,509. 

Abstract: On February 17, 2009, 

President Obama signed the American 

Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) 

into law (Pub. L. 111–5). ARRA 

supports investments in innovative 

strategies that are intended to lead to 

improved results for students, long-term 

gains in school and local education 

agency (LEA) capacity for success, and 

increased productivity and 

effectiveness. 

This evaluation will focus on 

answering four sets of policy/research 

questions: 

• To what extent did ARRA funds go 

to the intended recipients? 

• Is ARRA associated with the 

implementation of the key reform 

strategies it promoted? 

• What implementation supports and 

challenges are associated with ARRA? 

• Is ARRA associated with improved 

outcomes? 

The integrated evaluation will draw 

on existing data, including ED data 

collections, ED ARRA program files, 

ARRA required reporting, and databases 

of achievement and other outcomes. The 

evaluation will also collect new 

information through surveys of (1) the 

50 states and the District of Columbia, 

(2) a nationally representative sample of 

school districts, and (3) a nationally 

representative sample of schools within 

the sampled school districts. Surveys 

are planned for spring 2011, spring 

2012, and spring 2013. Subsamples of 

school districts will also be drawn to 

receive a smaller set of questions (polls); 

these polls will be administered twice 

between 2011 and 2013. 

A report will be prepared in the first 

year of the evaluation to describe the 

distribution of funding. A report and 

state tabulations will be prepared after 

each annual survey. The first report, 

based on the 2011 surveys, will focus on 

early ARRA implementation and 

strategies. The second report, based on 

the 2012 surveys, will expand upon 

strategies implemented under ARRA. 

The final report will draw upon existing 

data on outcomes as well as data from 

the 2013 surveys. 

This collection is for the recruitment 

phase of the evaluation. 

Requests for copies of the information 

collection submission for OMB review 

may be accessed from the RegInfo.gov 

Web site at http://www.reginfo.gov/

public/do/PRAMain or from the 

Department’s Web site at http:// 

edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the 

‘‘Browse Pending Collections’’ link and 

by clicking on link number 4385. When 

you access the information collection, 

click on ‘‘Download Attachments’’ to 

view. Written requests for information 

should be addressed to U.S. Department 

of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, 

SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537. 

Requests may also be electronically 

mailed to the Internet address 

ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202– 

401–0920. Please specify the complete 

title of the information collection and 

OMB Control Number when making 

your request. 

Individuals who use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Information 

Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877– 

8339. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30131 Filed 11–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION 

Procedural Manual for the Election 

Assistance Commission’s Voting 

System Testing and Certification 

Program, Version 2.0 

AGENCY: United States Election 

Assistance Commission (EAC). 

ACTION: Notice; publication of Voting 

System Testing and Certification 

Manual, Version 2.0, for 60 day public 

comment period on EAC Web site. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Election Assistance 

Commission (EAC) is publishing a 

procedural manual for its Voting System 

Testing and Certification Program. This 

manual sets the administrative 

procedures for obtaining an EAC 

Certification for voting systems. 

Participation in the program is strictly 

voluntary. The program is mandated by 

the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) at 

42 U.S.C. 15371. 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES