alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:96-cr-00020-MP-GRJ-4

JOHN CALVIN EVERETT, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation. (Doc. 645). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Petitioner has filed objections at Doc. 646. I have made

a de novo review based on those objections. Having considered the Report and

Recommendation, and the timely filed objections, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted. The Court agrees that Mr. Everett’s § 2255 motion at Doc.

642 -- relying upon Amendment 742 of the Sentencing Guidelines -- does not fall within the

narrow set of second § 2255 petitions that are not deemed successive. Additionally, even had

Mr. Everett relied upon 18 U.S.C. § 3582(b), Amendment 742 has not been made retroactively

applicable, and so that section does not help him. The Court has also reviewed the motion to

amend, found at Doc. 647, and concludes that nothing in that document would change the

Court’s 

Case 1:96-cr-00020-MW-GRJ Document 649 Filed 11/02/16 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

decision.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order. 

2. The motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Doc. 642, is SUMMARILY

DISMISSED, as this court lacks jurisdiction to consider a successive motion

absent authorization from the Eleventh Circuit.

3. The motion to amend at Doc. 647 is denied as any amendment would be futile.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of November, 2016

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:96-cr-00020-MP-GRJ-4

Case 1:96-cr-00020-MW-GRJ Document 649 Filed 11/02/16 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                            MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                            286
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  58,108
<ALLOWANCES>                                    4,280
<INVENTORY>                                    66,326
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              133,640
<PP&E>                                        378,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                159,230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                398,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          80,818
<BONDS>                                       124,013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          352
<OTHER-SE>                                    156,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  398,827
<SALES>                                       125,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              125,774
<CGS>                                         101,821
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 101,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               17,414
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,203
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,555
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,648
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,648
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.18



</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2532 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Cyclopropane-1,1-dicarboxylic acid, 

dimethyl ester. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Cyclopropane-1,1- 

dicarboxylic acid, dimethyl ester. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SEC. 1179. CYCLOPROPANE-1,1-DICARBOXYLIC ACID, DI4 METHYL ESTER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.69 Cyclopropane-1,1- 

dicarboxylic acid, dimethyl 

ester (CAS No. 6914–71–2) 

(provided for in subheading 

2917.20.00) ......................... 1.8% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 2532 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Report of Silver Pearl Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ DENISE D. SMITH
Denise D. Smith
Sole Member of the Board of Directors
Dated: October 30, 2009


/s/ DENISE D. SMITH
Denise D. Smith
Chief Executive Officer
Dated: October 30, 2009


/s/ DENISE D. SMITH
Denise D. Smith
Chief Financial Officer
Dated: October 30, 2009


/s/ DENISE D. SMITH
Denise D. Smith
Principal Accounting Officer
Dated: October 30, 2009




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:96-cr-00005-MP

CLARENCE JOHNSON, JR,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 52, Motion to obtain Credit for Time Served by

Clarence Johnson, Jr. On July 18, 1996, defendant Johnson was sentenced to a term of 262

months for possession of firearms and ammunition by a convicted felon. Johnson was

subsequently sentenced by the state to a term of 4 years, 8 month, and 24 days. Johnson was

released from state custody on May 8, 2000 at which time the federal sentence commenced. 

Johnson now requests credit toward the federal sentence for time spent in state custody. The

Court would like to hear the government’s response to defendant’s motion. Accordingly, it is

hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The government is directed to file a response to defendant’s motion to obtain

credit for time served in state custody on or before May 30, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of April, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:96-cr-00005-MW-GRJ Document 53 Filed 04/29/11 Page 1 of 1
§ 4280.416 Applicant eligibility. To receive an RBDG under this subpart, an applicant must meet the requirements specified in paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section. If an award is made to an applicant, that applicant (grantee) must continue to meet the requirements specified in this section. If the grantee does not, then grant funds may be recovered from the grantee by the Agency in accordance with Departmental Regulations. ( a ) *Type of applicant.* The Applicant must be one of the following: ( 1 ) A Public Body/Government Entity;
( 2 ) An Indian Tribe; or
( 3 ) A Nonprofit entity.
( b ) *Financial strength and expertise.* The Applicant must have sufficient financial strength and expertise in activities proposed in the application to ensure accomplishment of the described activities and objectives. ( 1 ) Financial strength will be analyzed by the Agency based on financial data provided in the application. The analysis will consider the applicant's tangible net worth, which must be positive, and whether the applicant has dependable sources of revenue or a successful history of raising revenue sufficient to meet cash requirements.
( 2 ) Expertise will be analyzed by the Agency based on the applicant staff's training and experience in activities similar to those proposed in the application and, if consultants will be used, on the staff's experience in choosing and supervising consultants.
( c ) *Universal identifier and system for awards management.* Unless exempt under 2 CFR 25.110, the Applicant must: ( 1 ) Be registered in the System for Awards Management (SAM) prior to submitting an application;
( 2 ) Maintain an active SAM registration with current information at all times during which it has an active Federal award or an application under consideration by the Agency; and
( 3 ) Provide its Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) in each application it submits to the Agency. The UEI is included on the Standard Form (SF) 424, “Application for Federal Assistance.”
( d ) *Delinquent debt.* The applicant must not have any delinquent debt to the Federal Government. If an applicant has any delinquent debt to the Federal Government, the applicant will be ineligible to receive any funds obligated under this subpart until the debt has been paid.
( e ) *Legal authority and responsibility.* Each Applicant must have the legal authority necessary to apply for and carry out the purpose of the grant.
[80 FR 15667, Mar. 25, 2015, as amended at 89 FR 34959, May 1, 2024]
#### The State ex rel. Burnes, Appellant, *v.*Athens County Clerk of Courts, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Burnes v. Athens Cty. Clerk of Courts*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 523.]

(Nos. 98-808 and 98-1130

Submitted September 15, 1998

Decided November 10, 1998.)

*524
      *Ellyn J. Burnes, pro se.*

*Per Curiam.*

Burnes asserts that the court of appeals erred in its various rulings. For the reasons that follow, however, Burnes’s contentions lack merit.

First, the court of appeals properly denied the writ. When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in Civ.R. 56, the nonmoving party may not rest on the mere allegations of her pleading, but her response, by affidavit or as otherwise provided in Civ.R. 56, must set forth specific facts showing the existence of a genuine triable issue. *Mootispaw v. Eckstein*(1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 383, 385, 667 N.E.2d 1197, 1199; Civ.R. 56(E). The clerk supported her summary judgment motion with an affidavit, which established that all of Burnes’s documents were properly docketed and filed. Burnes rested on the mere allegations of her complaint, and she failed to file Civ.R. 56 evidence setting forth specific, material facts supporting her claimed entitlement to extraordinary relief in mandamus.

Second, Burnes’s request for reconsideration was a nullity because her mandamus action was an original action filed in the court of appeals, thus rendering App.R. 26(A) inapplicable. *State ex rel. Clark v. Lile*(1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 220, 221, 685 N.E.2d 535, 536; *State ex rel. Pajestka v. Faulhaber*(1977), 50 Ohio St.2d 41, 42, 4 O.O.3d 113, 113-114, 362 N.E.2d 263, 263-264.

Finally, unlike criminal litigation, there is no general right of counsel in civil litigation. See, generally, *State ex rel. Jenkins v. Stern*(1987), 33 Ohio St.3d 108, 110, 515 N.E.2d 928, 930-931. Burnes has also not specified any pertinent statute or rule entitling her to appointed counsel in this appeal. See *State ex rel. Karmasu v. Tate*(1992), 83 Ohio App.3d 199, 206-207, 614 N.E.2d 827, 832; cf. *State ex rel. Asberry v. Payne*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 44, 693 N.E.2d 794.

*525Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.1

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

. We deny Burnes’s motion for “restraint and injunction” to prevent the clerk from “invading [her] privacy.” We lack jurisdiction to issue relief in the nature of a prohibitory injunction. *State ex rel. Lanham v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.*(1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 425, 426, 687 N.E.2d 283, 284.
4.905 Solicitation provision.

The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.204-3, Taxpayer Identification, in solicitations

that-

(a) Do not include the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management; and

(b) Are not conducted under the procedures of part 12.

Parent topic: Subpart 4.9 - Taxpayer Identification Number Information
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS:

ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL

FURNACES AND BOILERS

September, 2004

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585
This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

and

Navigant Consulting, Inc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday December 10, 2010.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to Be Considered:

Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-29903 Filed 11-23-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                 2885
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                          1117
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       4160
<PP&E>                                 7401
<DEPRECIATION>                        (4102)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         7819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   949
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 34
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                             6735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           7819
<SALES>                                3097
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       4197
<CGS>                                  2144
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          3215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       70
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         912
<INCOME-TAX>                            670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     242
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                            242
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. Case No. 1:96cr20-MW/GRJ-4

JOHN CALVIN EVERETT,

DefendantPetitioner.

___________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 667, and has also reviewed de novo Petitioner’s

objections to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 670. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Petitioner’s

objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating,

“Petitioner’s motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2255, ECF No. 666, is 

summarily DISMISSED as this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider a successive 

motion absent authorization from the Eleventh Circuit, or, alternatively, Petitioner’s 

motion should be DENIED as Petitioner is not entitled to resentencing. A 
2

Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.” The Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on January 2, 2018.

s/Mark E. Walker ____

United States District Judge
###### Editorial Note on Part 3406

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3406 appear at 76 FR 4809, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3406.14 Proposal review—teaching.

The proposal evaluation process includes both internal staff review and merit evaluation by peer review panels comprised of scientists, educators, business representatives, and Government officials who are highly qualified to render expert advice in the areas supported. Peer review panels will be selected and structured to provide optimum expertise and objective judgment in the evaluation of proposals.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

NICHOLAS WRAY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-156-AW-HTC

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting 

Commissioner of the Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF 

No. 21, and I have considered de novo the issues raised in Plaintiff’s objection, ECF 

No. 23. I now conclude that the Report and Recommendation should be approved, 

and it is adopted and incorporated by reference into this order. The clerk will enter 

a judgment that states “The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.” The clerk 

will then close the file.

SO ORDERED on April 5, 2022.

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00156-AW-HTC Document 24 Filed 04/05/22 Page 1 of 1
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 29 Filed 09/03/20 Page 1 of 8
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 29 Filed 09/03/20 Page 2 of 8
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 29 Filed 09/03/20 Page 3 of 8
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 29 Filed 09/03/20 Page 4 of 8
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 29 Filed 09/03/20 Page 5 of 8
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 29 Filed 09/03/20 Page 6 of 8
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 29 Filed 09/03/20 Page 7 of 8
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 29 Filed 09/03/20 Page 8 of 8
---

Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Quarterly Report of PDC 2005-B Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Richard W. McCullough

May 18, 2009Richard W. McCulloughChief Executive OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner/s/ Gysle R. Shellum

May 18, 2009Gysle R. ShellumChief Financial OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided by the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### §§ 4290.3031-4290.3034 [Reserved]
# 14.201 Preparation of invitations for bids.

- 14.201-1 Uniform contract format. 
- 14.201-2 Part I—The Schedule. 
- 14.201-3 PartII-Contract clauses. 
- 14.201-4 PartIII-Documents, exhibits, and other attachments. 
- 14.201-5 PartIV-Representations and instructions. 
- 14.201-6 Solicitation provisions. 
- 14.201-7 Contract clauses. 
- 14.201-8 Price related factors. 
- 14.201-9 Simplified contract format. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 14.2 - Solicitation of Bids
#### Saul Weprin, as Temporary Receiver of Freston Realty Corp., Respondent, v. First National City Bank, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 12, 1966, reversed insofar as appealed from, with $10 costs and disbursements, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s second cause of action granted, without costs. In our opinion, plaintiff wholly failed to raise any triable issue of fact with respect to the second cause of action. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin and Munder, JJ., concur; Ughetta, J., not voting.
- /app03/pdfs/396cv/002/74/29161t/00296001.tif
- /app03/pdfs/396cv/002/74/29161t/00296002.tif
Case 1:02-cr-00038-MP-AK Document 211 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:02-cr-00038-MP-AK Document 211 Filed 05/21/10 Page 2 of 2
# 16.203 Fixed-price contracts with economic price adjustment.

- 16.203-1 Description. 
- 16.203-2 Application. 
- 16.203-3 Limitations. 
- 16.203-4 Contract clauses. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 16.2 - Fixed-Price Contracts