alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 356.2 Appraisement.

Promptly following the seizure or other receipt of property specified in § 356.1, the Deputy Administrator shall determine the retail value of such property in the same quantity or quantities as seized. If the property may lawfully be sold in the United States, the value thereof shall be determined by ascertaining the price at which the property or similar property in the ordinary course of trade is freely offered for sale at the time of appraisement, and at a principal market as close as possible to the place of appraisement. If the property may not lawfully be sold in the United States, the value thereof shall be determined by other reasonable means.
Exhibit 31.4

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer:

I, J. Michael Carr certify that:

1.   I have reviewed  this Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Pioneer  Railcorp;
     and

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     report.


Date: April 28, 2005



By: /s/ J. Michael Carr
    -----------------------
    J. Michael Carr
    Chief Financial Officer
2006-0219.

#### Hutchins v. FedEx Ground Package Sys.

Summit App. No. 22551, 2005-Ohio-6738. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1504, 2006-Ohio-1389, 844 N.E.2d 851. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
#### Louis Dreyfus Corporation et al., Respondents-Appellants, v ACLI International, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents.

— Motion granted so as to amend the third line of the decretal paragraph of this court’s order entered on November 20, 1979 and the third line of the first paragraph and the fourth line from the bottom of the last paragraph of the memorandum decision filed therewith [72 AD2d 712] by deleting the sum of $142,355 and substituting therefor the sum of $172,280. Concur — Bloom, J. P., Markewich, Lupiano and Ross, JJ.
# L_2021377EN.01003301.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 377/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 377/33

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2021/1866

of 22 October 2021

amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP of 20 December 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo and repealing Common Position 2008/369/CFSP (1),

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 20 December 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/788/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 20 December 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/788/CFSP.

| (2) | On 29 June 2021, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution (‘UNSCR’) 2582 (2021), which amends the criteria for the designation of persons and entities to be subject to the restrictive measures set out in paragraphs 9 and 11 of UNSCR 1807 (2008). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 29 June 2021, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution (‘UNSCR’) 2582 (2021), which amends the criteria for the designation of persons and entities to be subject to the restrictive measures set out in paragraphs 9 and 11 of UNSCR 1807 (2008).

| (3) | Further Union action is needed in order to implement certain measures. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Further Union action is needed in order to implement certain measures.

| (4) | Decision 2010/788/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision 2010/788/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 3(1) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP, point (i) is replaced by the following:

| ‘(i) | planning, directing, sponsoring or participating in attacks against MONUSCO peacekeepers or United Nations personnel, including members of the Group of Experts, or against medical personnel or humanitarian personnel;’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(i)

planning, directing, sponsoring or participating in attacks against MONUSCO peacekeepers or United Nations personnel, including members of the Group of Experts, or against medical personnel or humanitarian personnel;’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 22 October 2021.

For the Council

The President

G. DOVŽAN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 336, 21.12.2010, p. 30.

1

---
4.1704 Contracting officer responsibilities.

(a) For other than indefinite-delivery contracts, the contracting officer shall ensure that 52.204-14,

Service Reporting Requirement, is included in solicitations, contracts, and orders as prescribed at

4.1705. For indefinite-delivery contracts, the contracting officer who awarded the contract shall

ensure that 52.204-15 Service Contract Reporting Requirements for Indefinite-Delivery Contracts, is

included in solicitations and contracts as prescribed at 4.1705. The contracting officer at the order

level shall verify the clause’s inclusion in the contract.

(b) If the contractor fails to submit a report in a timely manner, the contracting officer shall exercise

appropriate contractual remedies. In addition, the contracting officer shall make the contractor’s

failure to comply with the reporting requirements a part of the contractor’s performance information

under subpart 42.15.

Parent topic: Subpart 4.17 - Service Contracts Inventory
# Official Journal C 296/8 Se

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 296 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 588 September 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 296

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 588 September 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2015/C 296/01 | Six-Monthly Progress Report on the implementation of the EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (2015/I) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2015/C 296/01

Six-Monthly Progress Report on the implementation of the EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (2015/I)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 D0 18 4 . W I LLI E BENNETT v . CI TI MORTGAGE, I NC.

In t h i s d i s p o s s e s s o ry act i o n b ro u g h t b y Ci t i m ort g ag e, In c., ag ai n s t W i l l i e Ben net t , t h e m a g i s t r a t e co u rt i s s u ed a wri t o f po s ses s i o n i n fav o r o f Ci ti m o rt g ag e. Ben net t fi l ed a n u m

ber o f m o t i o n s i n t h e m ag i s t rat e co u rt , w h i c h were u l t i m at el y d i s m i s s ed

. Ben n et t t h en fi l ed a p et i t i o n fo r a wri t o f cert i o rari i n t h e st at e co u rt

. On Oct o b er 3 1 , 20 1 6 , t h e s t at e co u rt d en i ed Ben n et t ’s p et i t i on fo r cert i o rari

. Ben n et t

s o u g ht d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal o f t h i s o rd er o n No v em b er 30 , 2 01 6

. W e l ack j u ri s d i ct i o n b ecau s e Ben n et t’ s ap p l i cat i o n i s u n t i m el y

. Gen eral ly
, an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i on ary ap p eal m u s t be fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 day s

o f en t ry o f t h e ord er s o ug h t t o b e ap p eal ed

. OCGA § 5-6 -3 5 (d ). Bu t t h e un d erl y i n g

s u b ject m at t er o f an ap peal co n t ro l s o v er t h e rel i ef s o u g h t i n det erm in i n g t he p ro p er
ap p el l at e p ro ced u re. Reb i ch v. Mi l es , 2 6 4 Ga. 46 7 , 4 6 7 -4 6 8 (4 4 8 SE2 d 1 92 ) (1 9 9 4 ). Th e un d erl y i n g s u b

ject m at ter h ere i s a d i s p os s es so ry act i o n

. OCGA § 4 4 -7 -5 6
p ro v id es t h at an ap p eal fro m an y d i s p o s s es s o ry ju d g m en t m u s t b e fi l ed w i t hi n s ev en d ay s o f t h e d at e t h e ju d g m en t was en t ered

. See Ra y M

. W r ig h t
, In c. v. Jo n es , 2 3 9 Ga. Ap p

. 5 2 1 , 5 2 2 -5 2 3 (5 2 1 SE2 d 4 5 6) (1 9 9 9 ). Becau se Ben n et t ’ s ap p l i cat i o n was fi l ed
3 0 day s aft er t he s t at e co u rt ’ s Oct ob er 3 1 , 2 0 1 6 ord er was en tered
, t h i s ap p l i cat i o n i s December 14, 2016u n t i m el y . Acco rd i n g ly , t h i s ap pl i cat i o n i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 12/14/2016
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NITAR TECH CORP. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jose Gustavo
Brasil, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respect, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Jose Gustavo Brasil
-----------------------
Name: Jose Gustavo Brasil
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: December 5, 2006
#### § 4279.76 [Reserved]
§ 3560.402 Loan payment processing. ( a ) *Predetermined Amortization Schedule System (PASS) requirements.* All loans, except the loans specified in paragraph (c) of this section, must be closed and serviced using the PASS.
( b ) *Required conversion to PASS.* Borrowers with Daily Interest Accrual System (DIAS) accounts must convert to PASS with any loan servicing action.
( c ) *Exceptions.* Seasonal farm labor housing loans and on-farm labor housing loans may be closed on DIAS, monthly, or annual payment schedules.
[69 FR 69106, Nov. 26, 2004, as amended at 87 FR 11286, Mar. 1, 2022]
EXHIBIT 21.1
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                               
The following is a list of the Subsidiaries of the Company:
        
Subsidiary                                           Place of Incorporation
----------                                           ----------------------
Groundwater Technology Government Services, Inc.            Delaware
GTI Investment Company, Inc.                                Delaware
Fluor Daniel GTI International, Inc.                        Delaware
Fluor Daniel GTI Canada, Inc.*                              Province of Ontario,
                                                            Canada
Fluor Daniel GTI International Limited*                     United Kingdom
Groundwater Technology B.V.*                                The Netherlands
Fluor Daniel GTI Australia PTY, Limited*                    Australia
Groundwater Technology Italia S.r.1.*                       Italy
Fluor Daniel Environmental Services, Inc.                   California
              
*  Fluor Daniel GTI Canada,  Inc.  ("Canada"),  Fluor  Daniel GTI  International
   Limited ("UK"), Groundwater Technology B.V. ("Netherlands"), Fluor Daniel GTI
   Australia  PTY,  Limited  ("Australia")  and Fluor  Daniel GTI Italia  S.r.1.
   ("Italy") are indirect or "second-tier"  subsidiaries of the Company. Canada,
   UK,  Netherlands,  Australia and Italy are  subsidiaries  of Fluor Daniel GTI
   International,  Inc.,  which,  in turn, is a  wholly-owned  subsidiary of the
   Company.
§ 3201.28 Stationary equipment hydraulic fluids. ( a ) *Definition.* Fluids formulated for use in stationary hydraulic equipment systems that have various mechanical parts, such as cylinders, pumps, valves, pistons, and gears, that are used for the transmission of power (and also for lubrication and/or wear, rust, and oxidation protection).
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a biobased content of at least 44 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than May 14, 2009, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased stationary equipment hydraulic fluids. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased stationary equipment hydraulic fluids.
( d ) *Determining overlap with an EPA-designated recovered content product.* Qualifying biobased products that fall under this item may, in some cases, overlap with the EPA-designated recovered content product: Re-refined lubricating oils. USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information for the BioPreferred Web site of qualifying biobased products about the intended uses of the product, information on whether or not the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether or not a qualifying biobased product overlaps with EPA-designated re-refined lubricating oils and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing.
Note to paragraph ( d
):
Stationary equipment hydraulic fluid products within this designated item can compete with hydraulic fluid products with recycled content. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designated re-refined lubricating oils containing recovered materials as items for which Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.11. EPA provides recovered materials content recommendations for re-refined lubricating oils in the May 1, 1995, Recovered Materials Advisory Notice (RMAN I). The RMAN recommendations can be found by accessing EPA's Web site *http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/procure/products.htm* and then clicking on the appropriate product name.
[73 FR 27973, May 14, 2008]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000755113
<NAME>                        SurgiCare, Inc
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                        145
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 3166
<ALLOWANCES>                  1471
<INVENTORY>                   48
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              36
<PP&E>                        749
<DEPRECIATION>                439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                2464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1307
<BONDS>                       570
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   1
<COMMON>                      63
<OTHER-SE>                    1073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  2464
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              3192
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              585
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            36
<INCOME-PRETAX>               1505
<INCOME-TAX>                  587
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           918
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  918
<EPS-BASIC>                 .066
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .064



</TABLE>
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2834215-FEB-201107:57 AM
#### Toledo Bar Association *v.*Gatwood.

[Cite as *Toledo Bar Assn. v. Gatwood*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 227.]

(No. 97-2674

No. 98-831

Submitted May 26, 1998

Submitted June 10, 1998

Decided September 23, 1998.)

*228
      *James E. Goranson*and *W. David Arnold,*for relator.

*Per Curiam.*

In *Toledo Bar Assn. v. Gatwood*(1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 610, 522 N.E.2d 523, we publicly reprimanded respondent. In *Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 304, 677 N.E.2d 1182, we indefinitely suspended him. These two new matters present additional incidents that occurred during and after the period of his infractions in *Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood.*

*229In these cases, as in *Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood,*respondent failed to perform services for which he was retained and failed to return client funds. In that previously reported case, and in this one, respondent also wrote checks that were returned for insufficient funds, Even if respondent’s conduct was not willful and dishonest, the gross carelessness and negligence apparent in these repeated violations warrant a severe sanction.

In *Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Churilla*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 348, 678 N.E.2d 515, we said that the appropriate sanction for misappropriation of client funds and continued neglect of duty is disbarment. See, also, *Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Armón*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 497, 678 N.E.2d 1371, and *Columbus Bar Assn. v. Sterner*(1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 164, 167, 672 N.E.2d 633, 635. Respondent is disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in judgment only.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2345 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt passenger vehicles 

eligible for the alternative motor vehicle credit and the credit for qualified 

electric vehicles from the limitation on depreciation for luxury automobiles. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2006 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. BAUCUS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

passenger vehicles eligible for the alternative motor vehicle credit and the credit for qualified electric vehicles 

from the limitation on depreciation for luxury automobiles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘America’s Business 

5 Choice Act’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2345 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION FROM DEPRECIATION LIMITATION FOR 

2 CERTAIN ALTERNATIVE AND ELECTRIC PAS3 SENGER AUTOMOBILES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 280F(a) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limita6 tion) is amended by adding at the end the following new 

7 subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN ALTER9 NATIVE MOTOR VEHICLES AND QUALIFIED

10 ELECTRIC VEHICLES.—Subparagraph (A) shall 

11 not apply to any motor vehicle for which a cred12 it is allowable under section 30 or 30B.’’. 

13 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph (C) 

14 of section 280F(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

15 1986 is amended by striking clause (ii) and by redesig16 nating clause (iii) as clause (ii). 

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

19 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
98-1589.

#### State v. Willingham.

Clermont App. No. CA97-10-085. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that no conflict exists within the meaning of S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(B). See *State v. Rush*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 53, 697 N.E.2d 634. This cause is therefore dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2253 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2253

 To require the Secretary of the Interior to offer the 181 Area of the 
                Gulf of Mexico for oil and gas leasing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2006

 Mr. Domenici (for himself, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Talent, and Mr. Dorgan) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of the Interior to offer the 181 Area of the 
                Gulf of Mexico for oil and gas leasing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS LEASING IN 181 AREA OF GULF OF MEXICO.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) 181 area.--The term ``181 Area'' means the area 
        identified in map 15, page 58, of the Proposed Final Outer 
        Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program for 1997-2002 of 
        the Minerals Management Service.
            (2) Military mission line.--The term ``Military Mission 
        Line'' means the north-south line at 8641' W. longitude.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior, acting through the Minerals Management 
        Service.
    (b) Lease Sale.--Except as otherwise provided in this section, the 
Secretary shall offer the 181 Area for oil and gas leasing pursuant to 
the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.) as soon 
as practicable, but not later than 1 year, after the date of enactment 
of this Act.
    (c) Excluded Areas.--In carrying out subsection (b), the Secretary 
shall not offer for oil and gas leasing--
            (1) any area east of the Military Mission Line, unless the 
        Secretary of Defense agrees in writing before the area is 
        offered for lease that the area can be developed in a manner 
        that will not interfere with military activities; or
            (2) any area that is within 100 miles of the coastline of 
        the State of Florida.
    (d) Leasing Program.--The 181 Area shall be offered for lease under 
this section notwithstanding the omission of the 181 Area from any 
outer Continental Shelf leasing program under section 18 of the Outer 
Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1344).
                                 <all>
```