alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Silver Pearl Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   Dated:  May 15, 2008  /s/ Denise Smith  Name: Denise Smith Title:  Chief Executive Officer    Dated:  May 15, 2008  /s/ Denise Smith  Name: Denise Smith Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-10621, 33-21756, 33-34288, 33-48858, 33-54233
and 33-28981) of United Asset Management Corporation of our report dated
February 2, 2000 relating to the financial statements, which appears in the
Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 2, 2000 relating to the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears in
this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 21, 2000
# CI2021406EN.01000201.xml

| 8.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 406/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 406/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 5 October 2021

adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 5 of the European Union for the financial year 2021

(2021/C 406 I/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (1), and in particular Article 44 thereof,

Whereas:

| — | the Union’s budget for the financial year 2021 was definitively adopted on 18 December 2020 (2); |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union’s budget for the financial year 2021 was definitively adopted on 18 December 2020 (2);

| — | on 9 July 2021, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 5 to the general budget for the financial year 2021; |
| --- | --- |

—

on 9 July 2021, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 5 to the general budget for the financial year 2021;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council’s position on draft amending budget No 5 of the European Union for the financial year 2021 was adopted on 5 October 2021.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Luxembourg, 5 October 2021.

For the Council

The President

A. ŠIRCELJ

---

(1)  OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 93, 17.3.2021, p. 1.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oakmont Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, (the Report), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael C. Azar, President, Secretary, Principal Accounting Officer and a Director of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 14, 2007                                            
|                                                               
|/s/ Michael C. Azar                                            
|Michael C. Azar                                                
|President, Secretary, Principal Accounting Officer and Director
Exhibit 12

RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS

The ratio of earnings to fixed charges
and preferred dividends are presented in the following table. No shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, or any other class of preferred stock, were outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 and we did not pay
preferred stock dividends during these periods. Consequently, the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends are the same as the ratios of earnings to fixed charges for the same periods listed above. The ratios of earnings to fixed
charges and preferred dividends for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:



|                               |  |                          |  |      |  |      |  |      |  |     
|------------------------------ |  | ------------------------ |  | ---- |  | ---- |  | ---- |  | ----
|                               |  | Years ended December 31,
|                               |  | 2008                     |  | 2007 |  | 2006 |  | 2005 |  | 2004
|Excluding interest on deposits |  | 2.41                     |  | 2.16 |  | 2.13 |  | 2.60 |  | 3.20
|Including interest on deposits |  | 1.43                     |  | 1.32 |  | 1.30 |  | 1.49 |  | 1.71

For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings are the sum of income
before taxes and fixed charges, less the amount of preference security dividends (calculated as the amount of the dividend divided by one minus the Companys effective tax rate).

For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, fixed charges are the sum of



| | ¡ |  | interest and debt expenses, excluding interest on deposits, and, in the second alternative shown above, including interest on deposits; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ¡ |  | that portion of net rental expense deemed to be the equivalent to interest on long-term debt.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of Directors' Fees



 Exhibit 10-27 
  
 SUMMARY OF DIRECTORS’ FEES 
 AS OF MAY 1, 2004 
  
 The Duke Energy
Corporation Board of Directors approved the following retainer and attendance fees for directors, effective May 1, 2004: 
  

			
	 Board Retainer (cash)
  
 Board Retainer (stock)
	  	 •      $45,000
  
 •      $50,000
value (equity vehicle may vary)

		
	Board Meeting Fees	  	 •      $1,500, including telephonic meetings

		
	Lead Director Retainer	  	 •      $20,000

		
	Audit Committee Chair Retainer	  	 •      $20,000

		
	Other Committee Chair Retainers	  	 •      $7,500

		
	Audit Committee Meeting Fee	  	 •      $3,000 for in-person meetings held in conjunction with Board
meetings, including bifurcated meetings (e.g., meeting on day 1, with second meeting on day 2, both around Board meeting);
  
 •      $2,000 for telephonic meetings not in conjunction with Board meetings or for telephonic
participation in meetings held in conjunction with Board meetings

		
	Other Committee Meeting Fees	  	 •      $1,500 for in-person meetings held in conjunction with Board
meetings, including bifurcated meetings (e.g., meeting on day 1, with second meeting on day 2, both around Board meeting), telephonic meetings and telephonic participation in meetings held in conjunction with Board meetings;
  
 •      $2,500
for special, in-person meetings not in conjunction with Board meetings
2009 Short-Term Incentive Plan of Andrew S. Heyman



 Exhibit 10.4 
 2009 Short-Term Incentive Plan of Andrew S. Heyman 
 2009 STI Goals 
  

			
	Name: Andy Heyman	  	Job Title: COO
		
	Effective Dates of Plan: 1/1/09 – 12/31/09	  	Business Unit: Industries
		
	STI Potential: 100% of Base Salary	  	Manager: John Heyman

 Goals: 
  

												
	 Goal Description
	  	Weight	 	 	Payout
Timing	  	 Budget
 (show qtrly if applicable)
	  	 Target
 (show qtrly if applicable)
	  	Comments
	 Company Operating Income – 67% paid at Budget & 33% paid linearly between Budget & Target
	  	100	%	 	Annual	  	 Q1 = N/A
 Q2 = N/A
 Q3 = N/A
 Q4 = N/A
 Annual = [xxxxxx]*
	  	 Q1 = N/A
 Q2 = N/A
 Q3 = N/A
 Q4 = N/A
 Annual = [xxxxxx]*
	  	

  

	*	Filed under an application for confidential treatment.
#### § 319.55-4 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 22.0

List of Subsidiaries

First Tier

Matthews & Wright, Inc. (Delaware)
Snider, Williams & Co., Inc. (Delaware)
Randolph, Hudson & Co., Inc. (Delaware)
Eden Consulting, Inc. (New York)
Shaw Realty Company, Inc. (New York)
Burrows, Hayes Company, Inc. (New York)
Dover, Sussex Company, Inc. (New York)
Housing Capital Corporation (New York)
Randel, Palmer & Co., Inc. (New York)
Parker, Reld & Co., Inc. (New York)
McAdam, Taylor & Co., Inc. (New York)
Helmstar Funding, Inc. (Pennsylvania)
Ryan, Jones & Co., Inc. (New York)

Second Tier

Randolph, Hudson & Co., Inc. (99% investor)
Snider, Williams & Co., Inc. (1% investor)

Movieplex Realty Leasing, L.L.C. (New Jersey)
# L_2021057EN.01009401.xml

| 18.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 57/94 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 57/94

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1648 of 6 November 2020 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 370 I of 6 November 2020
  )

On pages 4 and 5, the Annex (amending Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006), the table concerning the list of persons, fifth column (‘Reasons for listing’), in each of entries 50 to 53:

for:

‘investigations launched against the Coordination Council launched by the opposition to challenge the outcome of that election and peaceful demonstrators.’,

read:

‘investigations launched against the Coordination Council and peaceful demonstrators.’.

---
Case 7:20-cv-00137-MCR-GRJ Document 184 Filed 04/30/21 Page 1 of 6
Case 7:20-cv-00137-MCR-GRJ Document 184 Filed 04/30/21 Page 2 of 6
Case 7:20-cv-00137-MCR-GRJ Document 184 Filed 04/30/21 Page 3 of 6
Case 7:20-cv-00137-MCR-GRJ Document 184 Filed 04/30/21 Page 4 of 6
Case 7:20-cv-00137-MCR-GRJ Document 184 Filed 04/30/21 Page 5 of 6
Case 7:20-cv-00137-MCR-GRJ Document 184 Filed 04/30/21 Page 6 of 6
# L_2021253EN.01001101.xml

| 16.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 253/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 253/11

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/1164

of 12 July 2021

conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Willamette Valley’ (PGI)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Willamette Valley’ forwarded by Willamette Valley Wineries Association (United States of America) and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Willamette Valley’ forwarded by Willamette Valley Wineries Association (United States of America) and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Willamette Valley’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Willamette Valley’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Willamette Valley’ (PGI) is hereby protected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2021.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 58, 18.2.2021, p. 86.

2

---
Exhibit 99.1




           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pioneer Railcorp (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  we, Guy  L.Brenkman,
President and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and J. Michael Carr,  Chief  Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Guy L. Brenkman                                /s/ J. Michael Carr
-------------------------------------              -----------------------------
Guy L. Brenkman                                    J. Michael Carr
President and Chief Executive Officer              Chief Financial Officer

March 25, 2003


                                       1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0623

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRANDON JEROME LAMBRIGHT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 6, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 28 2022

11/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0623
#### § 400.210 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NITAR TECH CORP. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Luiz Augusto
Brasil, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that;

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Luiz Augusto Brasil
-----------------------
Name: Luiz Augusto Brasil
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: December 5, 2006
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amalgamated Pictures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: August 20, 2011

/s/ Avery Pack_____________________Avery Pack, President andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) andActing Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)
#### § 29.3022 Finish.

The reflectance factor in color perception. Finish indicates the sheen or shine of the surface of a tobacco leaf. Descriptive terms range from bright to dingy. (See Elements of quality.)

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
§ 46.27 Types of broker operations. ( a ) Brokers carry on their business operations in several different ways and are generally classified by their method of operation. The following are some of the broad groupings by method of operation. The usual operation of brokers consists of the negotiation of the purchase and sale of produce either of one commodity or of several commodities. A broker is usually engaged by only one of the parties, but in negotiating a contract the broker acts as a special agent of first one and then the other party in conveying offers, counter offers, and acceptances between the parties. Once the contract is formed, and the confirmation issued, the broker's duties are usually ended, and the broker is not the proper party to whom notice of breach or of rejection should be directed. However, a broker receiving notice has a duty to promptly convey the notice to the proper party. Frequently, brokers never see the produce they are quoting for sale or negotiating for purchase by the buyer, and they carry out their duties by conveying information received from the parties between the buyer and seller until a contract is effected. Generally, the seller of the produce invoices the buyer, however, when there is a specific agreement between the broker and its principal, the seller invoices the broker who, in turn, invoices the buyer, collects, and remits to the seller. Under other types of agreements, the seller ships the produce to pool buyers, and the broker as an accommodation to the seller invoices the buyers, collects, and remits to the seller. Also, there are times when the broker is authorized by the seller to act much like a commission merchant, being given blanket authority to dispose of the produce for the seller's account either by negotiation of sales to buyers not known to the seller or by placing the produce for sale on consignment with receivers in the terminal markets.
( b ) There is a second general grouping of brokers which are commonly referred to as buying brokers. Their operations are typified by the fact that they act as the buyer's representative in negotiating purchases at shipping points, terminal markets, or intermediate points. Their typical type of operation is to negotiate a purchase on the buyer's instructions and authorization. Sometimes the broker negotiates the purchase without seeing the produce. In other instances he may select the merchandise after forming an appraisal of the quality of the produce being offered for sale on the market. Generally, a purchase is made in the buyer's name and the seller invoices the buyer direct. On the other hand, acting on authority given him by the buyer, the broker may negotiate purchases in his own name, pay the seller for the produce, make arrangements for its loading and shipment, and bill the buyer direct for the cost price plus the brokerage fee and the cost of any agreed upon accessorial service charges such as ice, loading, etc.
[28 FR 7067, July 11, 1963; 28 FR 7287, July 17, 1963, as amended at 62 FR 15087, Mar. 31, 1997]
#### § 4280.421 Term requirement.

A grant may be considered for the amount needed to assist with the completion of a proposed Project, provided that the Project can reasonably be expected to be completed within 1 full year after it has begun.