alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4 - 1

CHAPTER 4

DISTRESS, EMERGENCY, AND SAFETY TRAFFIC

PART I

400A. General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

400B. Obligations and Responsibilities of U.S. Vessels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

400C. Reporting Navigational Safety Information to Shore Establishments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

400D. Assistance by SAR Aircraft and Helicopters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

400E. Reports of Hostile Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

400F. Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRBs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

400G. Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

400H. The Inmarsat System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

400I. The SafetyNET System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

400J. Inmarsat-C SES Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

400K. Digital Selective Calling (DSC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

400L. Use of GMDSS Equipment for Routine Telecommunications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

400M. Instructions for Canceling Inadvertent Distress Alerts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

List of Operational VHF DSC Coast Stations for Sea Areas A1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

List of Operational MF DSC COAST Stations for Sea Areas A2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

List of Operational HF DSC COAST Stations for Sea Areas A3 and A4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

PART II

410A. Requests for U.S. Navy Assistance in Emergency Situations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

APPENDIX A Ocean Areas and Command Centers/Communications Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

APPENDIX B High Frequencies Guarded by Air Force, Navy, Coast Guard,

and Commercial Stations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

List of Inmarsat Coast Earth Stations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

List of Rescue Coordination Centers using Ship Earth Stations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
#### In the Matter of Ryan R. Administration for Children’s Services, Appellant; Yvonne M.-B. et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Sonya B. Administration for Children’s Services, Appellant; Yvonne M.-B. et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. *2.)*

[815 NYS2d 221]

*807In related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the petitioner appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Lim, J.), dated November 3, 2005, as paroled the children Ryan R. and Sonya B. to the paternal aunt and uncle, who reside in the State of New Jersey, pending final determination of the proceedings. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 25, 2005, enforcement of so much of the order dated November 3, 2005, as paroled Ryan R. and Sonya B. was stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the children Ryan R. and Sonya B. are remanded to the care and custody of the petitioner.

We agree with the Administration for Children’s Services and the children’s Law Guardian that, under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court erred in releasing the children Ryan R. and Sonya B. to live in the State of New Jersey without compliance with the Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children (hereinafter the ICPC). The stated purpose of the ICPC is to ensure that “[e]ach child requiring placement shall receive the maximum opportunity to be placed in a suitable environment and with persons or institutions having appropriate qualifications and facilities to provide a necessary and desirable degree and type of care” (Social Services Law § 374-a [1], art I [a]; *see Matter of Shaida*W, 85 NY2d 453, 458-459 [1995]; *Matter of Melinda D.,*31 AD3d 24 [2006]). Here, by refusing to wait for the ICPC process to be properly completed, the Family Court failed to ensure that the children were being sent to “a suitable environment” and that such a placement was in the children’s best interests *(see*Social Services Law § 374-a [1], art I [a]; *Matter of Shaida W., supra; Matter of Keanu Blue R.,*292 AD2d 614, 615 [2002]). Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Rivera and Dillon, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Morlex,
Inc. financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety be reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                         3101
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               3101
<PP&E>                                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 3101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          1480
<BONDS>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                      38920
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                                   (37299)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 3101
<SALES>                                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  0
<CGS>                                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              14067
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (14067)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (14067)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (14067)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0



</TABLE>
#### Antoni Grochowski, appellee, v. Polish National Alliance of the United States of North America, appellant.

Gen. No. 37,548.

Opinion filed November 5, 1934.

Joseph X. Waynne, for appellant. John J. Rooney and William H. Kailes, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-K/A (the “Report”) of ANTs software inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for the period ended December 31, 2009:
 
 1.      Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.
 
 Date:    April 20, 2010
  /s/Joseph KozakJoseph Kozak, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and

President
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
# Subpart 2.2 - Definitions Clause

**Parent topic:**Part 2 - Definitions of Words and Terms

## 2.201 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.202-1, Definitions, in *solicitations* and contracts that exceed the *simplified acquisition threshold*.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3405

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3405 appear at 76 FR 4808, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3405.12 Intent to submit a proposal.

To assist NIFA in preparing for the review of proposals, institutions planning to submit proposals may be requested to complete Form NIFA-711, “Intent to Submit a Proposal,” provided in the application package. NIFA will determine each year if Intent to Submit a Proposal forms will be requested and provide such information in the program announcement. If Intent to Submit a Proposal forms are required, one form should be completed and returned for each proposal an institution anticipates submitting. Submitting this form does not commit an institution to any course of action, nor does failure to send this form prohibit an institution from submitting a proposal.
#### Sun Ho Chung, Respondent, v Jeong Sook Joh et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[815 NYS2d 641]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Jeong Sook Joh, Shung-Peg Joh, and Bethel General Contracting, Inc., appeal, and the defendant Han Kook Gates separately appeals, from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss J.), dated April 5, 2005, which denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs to the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs, the motions are granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendants Jeong Sook Joh, *678Shung-Peg Joh, Bethel General Contracting, Inc., and Han Kook Gates, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when she tripped over yellow warning tape used to block off the sidewalk in front of a construction site as she was trying to cross the street to avoid the construction area. According to the plaintiff, the portion of the tape over which she tripped was stretched low to the ground and held beneath the tire of a van parked in the street.

The plaintiff commenced this action against, among others, the owner of the building where the construction was taking place, the general contractor, and a subcontractor (hereinafter collectively the defendants). The defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment on the ground that the yellow warning tape was open and obvious and did not constitute a dangerous condition were denied.

Summary judgment should have been granted in favor of the defendants since they made a prima facie showing that the complained-of condition was both open and obvious, i.e., readily observable by those employing the reasonable use of their senses, and not inherently dangerous *(see Cupo v Karfunkel,*1 AD3d 48, 49-53 [2003]). In opposition, the plaintiff presented no evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the yellow warning tape, even if placed low to the ground or partly obscured by a parked van, constituted a dangerous condition *(see e.g. Zimkind v Costco Wholesale Corp.,*12 AD3d 593, 594 [2004]; *Plis v North Bay Cadillac,*5 AD3d 578 [2004]; *Gibbons v Lido & Point Lookout Fire Dist.,*293 AD2d 646, 647 [2002]; *Tresgallo v Danica,*286 AD2d 326 [2001]; *Connor v Taylor Rental Ctr.,*278 AD2d 270 [2000]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the motions for summary judgment.

In light of our determination, we need not address the parties’ remaining contentions. Prudenti, P.J., Santucci, Krausman and Dillon, JJ., concur.
§ 3201.134 Gardening supplies and accessories. ( a ) *Definition.* Gardening supplies and accessories are products that are used to grow plants in outdoor and indoor settings. Examples include seedling starter trays, nonwoven mats or substrates for hydroponics, and flower or plant pots. This category excludes compost activators and accelerators; erosion control materials; fertilizers, including soil inoculants; foliar sprays; mulch and compost materials; and soil amendments.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 43 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased gardening supplies and accessories. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased gardening supplies and accessories.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]
19.1506 Women-Owned Small Business

Program sole-source awards.

(a) A contracting officer shall consider a contract award to an EDWOSB concern on a sole-source

basis (see 6.302-5(b)(7)) before considering small business set-asides (see 19.203 and subpart 19.5)

provided none of the exclusions at 19.1504 apply and-

(1) The acquisition is assigned a NAICS code in which SBA has determined that WOSB concerns are

underrepresented in Federal procurement;

(2) The contracting officer does not have a reasonable expectation that offers would be received

from two or more EDWOSB concerns; and

(3) The conditions in paragraph (c) of this section exist.

(b) A contracting officer shall consider a contract award to a WOSB concern (including EDWOSB

concerns) eligible under the WOSB Program on a sole-source basis (see 6.302-5(b)(7)) before

considering small business set-asides (see 19.203 and subpart 19.5) provided none of the exclusions

at 19.1504 apply and-

(1) The acquisition is assigned a NAICS code in which SBA has determined that WOSB concerns are

substantially underrepresented in Federal procurement;

(2) The contracting officer does not have a reasonable expectation that offers would be received

from two or more WOSB concerns (including EDWOSB concerns); and

(3) The conditions in paragraph (c) of this section exist.

(c)

(1) The anticipated award price of the contract, including options, will not exceed-

(i) $7 million for a requirement within the NAICS codes for manufacturing; or

(ii) $4.5 million for a requirement within any other NAICS codes.

(2) The EDWOSB concern or WOSB concern has been determined to be a responsible contractor

with respect to performance.

(3) The award can be made at a fair and reasonable price.

(d) A contracting officer shall only award a sole-source contract to a concern that has been certified

pursuant to 13 CFR 127.300 as an EDWOSB or WOSB eligible under the WOSB program.

Contracting officers shall not request a status determination from SBA on pending applications for

certification for EDWOSB or WOSB sole-source awards.

(e) The SBA has the right to appeal the contracting officer’s decision not to make a sole-source

award to either an EDWOSB concern or WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB program.

Parent topic: Subpart 19.15 - Women-Owned Small Business Program.
2006-0727.

#### State v. Lohmeyer.

Lucas App. No. L-05-1059. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
CHAPTER 11. CONSUMER SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

11.1 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 11-1

11-i 
CHAPTER 11. CONSUMER SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

11.1 METHODOLOGY

The consumer subgroup analysis evaluates impacts on any identifiable groups or 

consumers who may be disproportionately affected by any national energy conservation

standard. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will conduct this analysis as one of the analyses 

for the notice of proposed rulemaking. DOE will accomplish this, in part, by analyzing the LCC 

and payback periods (PBPs) for those consumers that fall into any identifiable groups. DOE 

plans to evaluate variations in regional energy prices and variations in energy use that might 

affect the net present value of a standard to consumer subpopulations. To the extent possible, 

DOE will obtain estimates of each input parameter’s variability and will consider this variability 

in its calculation of consumer impacts. 

DOE will determine the impact on consumer subgroups using the LCC Spreadsheet 

Model, which allows for different data inputs. The standard LCC analysis (described in chapter 8 

of this preliminary technical support document (TSD)) focuses on the households that use 

residential dehumidifiers. DOE can use the LCC Spreadsheet Model to analyze the LCC for any 

subgroup by sampling only that subgroup. (Chapter 8 of the preliminary TSD explains in detail 

the inputs to the model used in determining LCC and PBPs.) In the case of residential 

dehumidifiers, possible subgroups DOE may choose to consider are: (1) low-income households, 

and (2) senior citizens. 

DOE will be especially sensitive to increases in the purchase price of the product due to 

amended standards, to avoid negative impacts on identifiable population groups that may not be 

able to afford significant increases in product price. 

11-1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

CIM Trucking, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Mac Leod Metals Co., a California corporation
Metal Management Aerospace, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Alabama, Inc., a Delaware corporation
MTLM Arizona, Inc., an Arizona corporation
Metal Management Arizona, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company
Metal Management Connecticut, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Gulf Coast, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Indiana, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Metal Management Memphis, L.L.C., a Tennessee limited liability company
Metal Management Midwest, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Metal Management Mississippi, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
Metal Management New Haven, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Northeast, Inc., a New Jersey corporation
Metal Management Ohio, Inc., a Ohio corporation
Metal Management S&A Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Pittsburgh, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Realty, Inc., an Arizona corporation
Metal Management Stainless & Alloy, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management West, Inc., a Colorado corporation
Metal Management West Coast Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Proler Southwest Inc., a Texas corporation
Reserve Iron & Metal Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership

Southern Recycling, L.L.C., a Louisiana limited liability company (ownership of
a 28.5% interest)

Rondout Iron & Metal, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (ownership of
50%)
# L_2021336DE.01004701.xml

| 23.9.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 336/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 336/47

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2021/695 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 28. April 2021 zur Einrichtung von „Horizont Europa“, dem Rahmenprogramm für Forschung und Innovation, sowie über dessen Regeln für die Beteiligung und die Verbreitung der Ergebnisse und zur Aufhebung der Verordnungen (EU) Nr. 1290/2013 und (EU) Nr. 1291/2013

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 170 vom 12. Mai 2021
  )

Seite 19, Artikel 4 Absatz 1 Buchstabe b Ziffer iv

Anstatt:

| „iv) | Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Raumfahrt‘;“ |
| --- | --- |

„iv)

Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Raumfahrt‘;“

muss es heißen:

| „iv) | Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Weltraum‘;“. |
| --- | --- |

„iv)

Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Weltraum‘;“.

Seite 25, Artikel 12 Absatz 2 Buchstabe b Ziffer iv

Anstatt:

| „iv) | 13 462 000 000 EUR für das Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Raumfahrt‘;“ |
| --- | --- |

„iv)

13 462 000 000 EUR für das Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Raumfahrt‘;“

muss es heißen:

| „iv) | 13 462 000 000 EUR für das Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Weltraum‘;“. |
| --- | --- |

„iv)

13 462 000 000 EUR für das Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Weltraum‘;“.

Seite 25, Artikel 12 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b Ziffer iii

Anstatt:

| „iii) | 171 000 000 EUR zu konstanten Preisen von 2018 für das Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Raumfahrt‘;“ |
| --- | --- |

„iii)

171 000 000 EUR zu konstanten Preisen von 2018 für das Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Raumfahrt‘;“

muss es heißen:

| „iii) | 171 000 000 EUR zu konstanten Preisen von 2018 für das Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Weltraum‘;“. |
| --- | --- |

„iii)

171 000 000 EUR zu konstanten Preisen von 2018 für das Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Weltraum‘;“.

Seite 26, Artikel 13 Absatz 3 Buchstabe b

Anstatt:

| „b) | 25 % für das Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Raumfahrt‘;“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

25 % für das Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Raumfahrt‘;“

muss es heißen:

| „b) | 25 % für das Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Weltraum‘;“. |
| --- | --- |

„b)

25 % für das Cluster ‚Digitalisierung, Industrie und Weltraum‘;“.

---