alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Nova Resources Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material
       respects, the financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
       Company.


Date:  October 16, 2006


/s/ Alexander Craven
---------------------------------
Alexander Craven, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2614 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2614

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
    to provide the President with the authority to exempt civilian 
      Department of Defense personnel accounts from sequestration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2013

Mr. Barrow of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                     to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
    to provide the President with the authority to exempt civilian 
      Department of Defense personnel accounts from sequestration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPTIONAL EXEMPTION OF CIVILIAN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
              PERSONNEL WHO HAVE SERVED IN THE UNIFORM SERVICES.

    Section 255(f) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985 is amended--
            (1) in the side heading by inserting before the period at 
        the end ``and Certain Civilian Personnel of the Department of 
        Defense''; and
            (2) in paragraph (1) by adding at the end the following new 
        sentence: ``The President may also, with respect to civilian 
        employees of the Department of Defense who served in the Armed 
        Forces on or after August 2, 2011, exempt that portion of the 
        personnel account covering them from sequestration or provide 
        for a lower uniform percentage reduction than would otherwise 
        apply.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Uniwell Electronic Corporation., on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Luiz Brasil, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended January 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and January 31, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Uniwell Electronic Corporation.



|                  |     |                                                               | 
|----------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|September 5, 2013 | By: | /s/ Luiz Brasil                                               | 
|                  |     | Luiz Brasil                                                   | 
|                  |     | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer               | 
|                  |     | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
#### § 3550.153 Fees.

RHS may assess reasonable fees including a tax service fee, fees for late payments, and fees for checks returned for insufficient funds.
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the December 1, 1987
Prospectus (Registration No. 33-07056-A) of our report, dated February 5, 1997,
on the financial statements of Yager/Kuester Public Fund Limited Partnership,
which appears on page 6 of this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996 and to the reference to our Firm under the caption "Experts"
in such Prospectus.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Charlotte,  North Carolina
March 31, 1997




                                       30
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the quarterly report of SurgiCare, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Phillip C. Scott,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(1)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Phillip C. Scott, Chief Financial Officer(1)
May 14, 2003

------------------
(1) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SurgiCare, Inc. and will be retained by SurgiCare, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 351.7 Regulations governing importation by mail of plant material for immediate export. To collectors of customs and others concerned: ( a ) Shipments of plant material may be imported by mail free of duty for immediate exportation by mail subject to the following regulations, which have been approved by the Department of Agriculture and the Post Office Department: ( 1 ) Each shipment shall be dispatched in the mails from abroad, accompanied by a yellow and green special mail tag bearing the serial number of the permit for entry for immediate exportation or immediate transportation and exportation, issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and also the postal form of customs declaration.
( 2 ) Upon arrival, the shipment shall be detained by, or redispatched to, the postmaster at Washington, DC, Brownsville, Tex., Hoboken, N.J., Honolulu, Hawaii, Jamaica, L.I., N.Y., Laredo, Tex., Miami, Fla., New Orleans, La., San Francisco, Calif., San Juan, P.R., San Pedro, Calif., or Seattle, Wash., as may be appropriate, according to the address on the yellow and green tag, and there submitted to the customs officer and the Federal quarantine inspector. The merchandise shall under no circumstances be permitted to enter the commerce of the United States.
( 3 ) After inspection by the customs and quarantine officers, and with their approval, the addressee, or his authorized agent, shall repack and readdress the mail parcel under customs supervision; affix to the parcel the necessary postage, and comply with other mailing requirements, after which the parcel shall be delivered to the postmaster for exportation by mail pursuant to 19 CFR 9.11(a). The contents of the original parcel may be subdivided and exported in separate parcels in like manner.
( 4 ) It will not be necessary to issue a customs mail entry nor to require formal entry of the shipments.
( 5 ) The mail shipments referred to shall be accorded special handling only at the points specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( 6 ) The foregoing procedure shall not affect the movement of plant material in the international mails in transit through the United States.
[24 FR 9923, Dec. 9, 1959, as amended at 28 FR 5204, May 24, 1963]
#### § 4279.137 Financial statements.

Except for audited financial statements required by § 4279.71, the lender will determine the type and frequency of submission of financial statements by the borrower and any guarantors. At a minimum, annual financial statements prepared by an accountant in accordance with GAAP are required, except for personal financial statements and cooperative stock purchase loans in accordance with § 4279.115(a) that do not have to be prepared in accordance with GAAP. However, if the loan amount exceeds $10 million or if circumstances warrant, the Agency may require annual audited financial statements.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2267 

To withdraw normal trade relations treatment from, and apply certain provisions of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 to, the products of the 

People’s Republic of China. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2006 

Mr. DORGAN (for himself and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To withdraw normal trade relations treatment from, and 

apply certain provisions of title IV of the Trade Act 

of 1974 to, the products of the People’s Republic of 

China. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WITHDRAWAL OF NORMAL TRADE RELATIONS 

4 TREATMENT FROM THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC 

5 OF CHINA. 

6 Notwithstanding the provisions of title I of the Act 

7 to authorize extension of nondiscriminatory treatment 

8 (normal trade relations treatment) to the People’s Repub-
2 

•S 2267 IS

1 lic of China, and to establish a framework for relations 

2 between the United States and the People’s Republic of 

3 China (Public Law 106–286), or any other provision of 

4 law, effective on the date of the enactment of this Act— 

5 (1) normal trade relations treatment shall not 

6 apply pursuant to section 101 of that Act to the 

7 products of the People’s Republic of China; 

8 (2) normal trade relations treatment may there9 after be extended to the products of that country 

10 only in accordance with the provisions of sections 

11 401 through 409 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 

12 U.S.C. 2431–2439) as in effect with respect to the 

13 products of the People’s Republic of China on the 

14 day before the effective date of the accession of the 

15 People’s Republic of China to the World Trade Or16 ganization; and 

17 (3) the extension of waiver authority that was 

18 in effect with respect to the People’s Republic of 

19 China under section 402(d)(1) of the Trade Act of 

20 1974 on the day before the effective date of the ac21 cession of the People’s Republic of China to the 

22 World Trade Organization shall, upon the enactment 

23 of this Act, be deemed not have expired, and shall 
3 

•S 2267 IS

1 continue in effect until the date that is 90 days after 

2 the date of such enactment. 

Æ
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:02-cr-00035-MP-AK

SHANE MARSHALL STARR,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 108, Motion to Seal Proceedings, filed by

Defendant Shane Starr. In the motion, Defendant requests the Court to seal the record of the

revocation of supervised release hearing that occurred on June 21, 2007. Because of the nature

of the proceedings, the Court agrees with Defendant that this matter should be sealed. 

Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Defendant’s Motion to Seal Proceedings, Doc. 108, is granted, and the Clerk is directed

to seal the revocation proceedings that occurred on June 21, 2007.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of June, 2007

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:02-cr-00035-MP-AK Document 109 Filed 06/26/07 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28730]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2010-0052]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Notice of Claim and Proof of Loss, Working Capital 
Guarantee.

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (``Ex-Im Bank'') 
is the official export credit agency of the United States. Its mission 
is to create and sustain U.S. jobs by financing U.S. exports through 
direct loans, guarantees, insurance and working capital credits. By 
neutralizing the effect of export credit support offered by foreign 
governments and by absorbing credit risks that the private sector will 
not accept, Ex-Im Bank enables U.S. exporters to compete fairly in 
foreign markets on the basis of price and product. Under the Working 
Capital Guarantee Program, Ex-Im Bank provides repayment guarantees to 
lenders on secured, short-term working capital loans made to qualified 
exporters. The guarantee may be approved for a single loan or a 
revolving line of credit.
    In the event that a borrower defaults on a transaction guaranteed 
by Ex-Im Bank the guaranteed lender may seek payment by the submission 
of a claim. This collection of information is necessary, pursuant to 12 
U.S.C. 635(a)(1), to determine if such claim complies with the terms 
and conditions of the relevant insurance policy.
    This form can be reviewed at http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/EIB_10_04 Claim_Filing_Form-Working Capital.pdf.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before January 18, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Comments maybe submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Michele Kuester, Export Import Bank 
of the United States, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Titles and Form Number: Notice of Claim and Proof of Loss, Working 
Capital Guarantee (EIB 10-04).
    OMB Number: 3048-XXXX.
    Type of Review: New.
    Need and Use: This collection provides Ex-Im Bank staff with the 
information necessary to process the filing of a claim for a defaulted 
transaction under Ex-Im Bank's Working Capital Guarantee program.
    Number of respondents: 20.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-28730 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
EXHIBIT 21.1

                           Subsidiaries of Registrant


1.       Bonneville Fuels Corporation
a.       Bonneville Fuels Marketing Corporation
b.       Bonneville Fuels Operating Corporation
c.       Bonneville Fuels Management Corporation
d.       Colorado Gathering Corporation

2.       Bonneville Pacific Services Company, Inc.
a.       Cogeneracion de Navojoa  S.A. de C.V. (CONAV)
b.       Proveedora de Energia Servicios y Conexos, S. de R.L. de C. V. (PESCO)

3.       Bonneville Nevada Corporation

4.       Bonneville Las Vegas Corporation

5.       Nevada Cogeneration Associates #1

6.       Nevada Cogeneration Associates #3

7.       Bonneville McKenzie Energy Corporation
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALBER I. SAID; GEORGETTE H. SAID,

Petitioners

- Appellants,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

Respondent

- Appellee. No. 20

- 70223

Tax Ct. No. 18597

- 19

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted February 17, 2021 * *

Before: FERNANDEZ, BYBEE and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Alber I. Said and Georgette H. Said appeal pro se from the Tax Court’s

order dismissin g for lack of jurisdiction their petition regarding their tax liabilities

for the 1993 to 1995 tax years. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 70223

We review de novo. Gor ospe v. Comm ’ r , 451 F.3d 966, 968 (9th Cir. 2006). We

affirm.

The Tax Court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over the Saids’

petition because the Saids did not file it within 90 days of a notice of deficiency or

30 days of a notice of determination. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 6213(a) (establishing a 90

-

day requirement for appealing a notice of deficiency); 6320(c) & 6330(d)(1)

(establishing a 30

- day requirement for ap pealing a notice of determination

concerning notices of lien or notices of intent to levy); Gorospe , 451 F.3d at 968

(the Tax Court is a court of limited jurisdiction, and its subject matter is defined by

Title 26 of the United States Code).

We reject as merit less the Saids’ contention s that the Tax Court’s final

decision s sustaining the deficiency for 1993 to 1995 were reached by fraud or

mutual mistake

, and that Tax Court R ul e s 314 and 341 create jurisdiction for their

petition.

We do not consider matte rs not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

.

All pending motions and requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.
§ 3201.87 Wood and concrete stains. ( a ) *Definition.* Products that are designed to be applied as a finish for concrete and wood surfaces and that contain dyes or pigments to change the color without concealing the grain pattern or surface texture.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 39 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than April 4, 2013, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased wood and concrete stains. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased wood and concrete stains.
[77 FR 20289, Apr. 4, 2012]
```

[106th Congress Public Law 239]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ239.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 492]]

Public Law 106-239
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate certain facilities of the United States Postal Service in 
         South Carolina. <<NOTE: July 6, 2000 -  [H.R. 3018]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAYFORD R. JOHNSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The United States Post Office located at 301 Main 
Street in Eastover, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as the 
``Layford R. Johnson Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United States Post 
Office referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Layford R. Johnson Post Office''.

SEC. 2. RICHARD E. FIELDS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The United States Post Office located at 78 
Sycamore Street in Charleston, South Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Richard E. Fields Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United States Post 
Office referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Richard E. Fields Post Office''.

SEC. 3. MARYBELLE H. HOWE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The United States Post Office located at 557 East 
Bay Street in Charleston, South Carolina, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Marybelle H. Howe Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United States Post 
Office referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Marybelle H. Howe Post Office''.

SEC. 4. MAMIE G. FLOYD POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The United States Post Office located at 4026 
Lamar Street in (the Eau Claire community of ) Columbia, South Carolina, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Mamie G. Floyd Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United

[[Page 114 STAT. 493]]

States Post Office referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Mamie G. Floyd Post Office''.

    Approved July 6, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3018:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: Vol. 146 (2000):
            Mar. 8, considered and passed House.
            June 23, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 3201.133 Foliar sprays. ( a ) *Definition.* Foliar sprays are products that are applied to the leaves of plants and provide plants with nutrients. These products may also repair plants from previous pest attacks. Examples include liquid fertilizers, foliar feeds, and micronutrient solutions.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 50 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased foliar sprays. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased foliar sprays.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]