alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THERMO INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994             
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1994             
<CASH>                                         152,933            
<SECURITIES>                                    15,931              
<RECEIVABLES>                                  168,394              
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,779             
<INVENTORY>                                    121,353                 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               489,656                 
<PP&E>                                         170,907                 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,983                 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,011,917                
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          259,350               
<BONDS>                                        122,225                 
<COMMON>                                         4,816               
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                
<PREFERRED>                                          0                 
<OTHER-SE>                                     435,947                 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,011,917                 
<SALES>                                        649,992               
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               649,992                 
<CGS>                                          335,341                
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  335,341                
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,924               
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   733                
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,761                
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 95,880                
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,507              
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             58,261                 
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,959               
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                    
<CHANGES>                                            0                    
<NET-INCOME>                                    60,220               
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68                
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63                   
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the December 1, 1987
Prospectus (Registration No. 33-07056-A) of our report, dated February 11, 2003,
on the financial statements of Yager/Kuester Public Fund Limited Partnership,
which appears on page 5 of this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 and to the reference of our Firm under the caption "Experts"
in such Prospectus.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
March 31, 2003
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:02-cr-00035 MMP

SHANE MARSHALL STARR,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 99, Motion for Status of Defendant’s

Examination, Filed by Defendant Shane Marshall Starr. In his motion, Defendant states that he

has not been designated to see a physician, a psychologist, or a psychiatrist, and has not received

any treatment for his underlying problems, as was ordered by the Court in Doc. 98. Defendant

requests an update on the status of his examination and treatment. A hearing on this matter was

held on Friday, March 23, 2007. At the hearing, the United States Marshal stated that daily

attempts have been made to transport the Defendant to a facility, but so far no facility has been

available to accept the Defendant. In accordance with the Court’s prior order, the United States

Marshal shall transport the Defendant to the designated facility at the earliest possible time and

in the most expeditious manner for evaluation, and the Government shall keep the Court and the

Defendant’s lawyer, Thomas E. Miller, apprised of the status of the Defendant’s examination.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of March, 2007

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:02-cr-00035-MP-AK Document 101 Filed 03/23/07 Page 1 of 1
#### Abraham Resnikoff, Respondent, v Abraham Yagoda, Individually and Doing Business as Aywon Wire & Metal Company, et al., Appellants.

ts. Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 2, 1979, affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. No opinion. The discovery and inspection shall proceed at the place directed in the order under review at a time to be specified in a written notice of not less than 60 days, to be given by plaintiff or at such other time and place as may be agreed to by the parties. Damiani, J. P., Margett, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.20

THIRD AMENDMENT TOEXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

        ThisAmendment is made as of the 3rd day of September 2002, between THERAGENICS CORPORATION, aDelaware Corporation (the “Company”) and BRUCE W. SMITH (the“Executive”). 

INTRODUCTION 

        TheCompany and the Executive are parties to that certain executive employment agreement datedJanuary 1, 1999, amendment to executive employment agreement dated June 29, 1999 andsecond amendment to executive employment agreement dated June 15, 2001 (hereinaftercollectively referred to as the “Executive Employment Agreement”). The partiesnow desire to amend the Executive Employment Agreement to provide as follows: 

        NOWTHEREFORE, the parties amend the Executive Employment Agreement as follows: 

1.              By substituting the following for Section 4(f): 

    (f)                 Certain Terminations in Connection with a Change in Control. If, within          ninety (90) days preceding or within one year following a Change in Control,          either the Company terminates the Executive’s employment without Cause or          the Executive terminates his Employment for any reason before notification by          the Company to the Executive that the Executive’s Employment will be          terminated for Cause, the Company shall be obligated to pay the Executive an          amount equal to whichever of the following results in the Executive receiving a          larger after-tax amount: (i) three (3) times the Executive’s annual base          salary at the time of termination of employment or (ii) if less than three times          the Executive’s annual base salary at the time of termination of          employment, then the largest amount that could be paid to the Executive, which          will not result in a nondeductible “parachute payment” under Section          280G of the Internal Revenue Code. Such amount shall be paid to the Executive          ratably over two (2) years following termination. 

        Exceptas specifically amended hereby, the Executive Employment Agreement shall remain in fullforce and effect as prior to this Amendment. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company andthe Executive have each executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first shownabove. 

      THECOMPANY:

THERAGENICS CORPORATION 

By: /s/ M. ChristineJacobsTitle:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-QSB

(Mark One)

(X) Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 

For the quarterly period year ended August 31, 1997

(  ) Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 

For the transition period from            to 

Commission file number 0-14401

SANDATA, INC.
(Name of Small Business Issuer in Its Charter)

Delaware                                               11-2841799
(State or Other Jurisdiction of                      (IRS Employer
 Incorporation or Organization)                   Identification No.)

26 Harbor Park Drive, Port Washington, NY             11050
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)            (Zip Code)

             516-484-9060
(Issuer's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since 
Last Report)

Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed 
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months 
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file 
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements 
for the past 90 days.

Yes        X         No  

APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS

Check whether the issuer has filed all documents and reports required 
to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the 
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes                  No  

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of 
common equity, as of October 10, 1997 was 1,587,199 shares.


Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format  (check one):



Yes                  No  X
#### § 4284.8 Grant approval and obligation of funds.

The following statement will be entered in the comment section of the Request for Obligation of Funds, which must be signed by the grantee:

The grantee certifies that it is in compliance with and will continue to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, Executive Orders and other generally applicable requirements, including those contained in the applicable 7 CFR part 4284 and the Grants and Agreements Departmental Regulations as currently codified in 2 CFR parts 400, 415, 417, 418, and 421, in effect on the date of grant approval, and the approved Letter of Conditions.

[79 FR 76017, Dec. 19, 2014]
#### § 4284.941 Application withdrawal.

During the period between the submission of an application and the execution of award documents, the Applicant must notify the Agency in writing if the project is no longer viable or the Applicant no longer is requesting financial assistance for the project. When the Applicant notifies the Agency, the selection will be rescinded or the application withdrawn.
#### CLARK, Respondent, v. ULSTER & D. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

June 27, 1906.)

Action by W. Frank Clark against the Ulster & Delaware Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph M. Paquette, Appellant, v. Charles Cyrta, as Warden of the Suffolk County Jail, Respondent.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 21, 1969, affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to relator instituting another habeas corpus proceeding if he is not brought to trial on the indictment, dated March 29, 1967, charging him with murder in the first degree, by June 2, 1969. No opinion. The notice of appeal is herewith amended to show that the appeal is from said judgment instead of from a supposed order dated January 20,1969. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Bleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-46766, 333-62206, and 333-105507) of our
report dated April 29, 2009 relating to our audit of the consolidated financial
statements of ANTs software inc. included in the 2008 annual report on Form
10-K. Our audit report on the consolidated financial statements contains an
emphasis of a matter paragraph regarding substantial doubt as to the ability of
the Company to continue as a going concern. We also consent to the incorporation
by reference in such Registration Statements of our report on the effectiveness
of the Company's internal control over financial reporting dated April 29, 2009.
Our report contains an adverse opinion due to a material weakness in internal
controls.


/s/ Weiser LLP

New York, NY
April 29, 2009
1334 YORK AVENUE     NEW
 YORK NY 10021     212 606.7000 WWW.SOTHEBYS.COM





Exhibit_10.6



SOTHEBY’S NEVADA, INC.

5600
Spring Mountain Road, Suite 104

Las Vegas, Nevada 89102



February 11, 2009


Acquavella Contemporary Art,
Inc.

c/o Mr. William R. Acquavella

300 Pleasure Drive

Flanders, NY 11901


Dear Bill:


This letter agreement amends
the Agreement of Partnership (the “Partnership Agreement”) of Acquavella Modern
Art, a Nevada general partnership, dated May 29, 1990, between Sotheby’s Nevada, Inc., a Nevada Corporation
(“Sotheby’s
Partner”), and Acquavella Contemporary Art, Inc., a Nevada Corporation
(“Acquavella Partner”).


By prior letters of
amendment, we have agreed to extend the term of the Partnership Agreement
through March 31, 2009. By this
letter of amendment, we are agreeing to extend the term of the Partnership
Agreement for one additional year through March 31, 2010. Accordingly, each of
the Sotheby’s Partner and the Acquavella Partner hereby agree to amend Section
1.5 (iii) of the Partnership Agreement, as heretofore
amended, to delete the reference to March 31, 2009 and substitute therefor the
date of “March 31, 2010.”


Except as amended hereby,
the Partnership Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and is hereby
ratified and confirmed.


Please sign this letter
agreement in the space provided below. Upon execution on behalf of the
Acquavella Partner, this letter agreement shall be effective as of the date of
this letter.


SOTHEBY’S NEVADA, INC.


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
By:

	
/s/ William F. Ruprecht

	
 


	
 

	


	
 


	
 

	
William F. Ruprecht, President

	
 





AGREED
AND ACCEPTED

ACQUAVELLA CONTEMPORARY ART, INC.


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
By:

	
/s/ William R. Acquavella

	
 


	
 

	


	
 


	
 

	
William R. Acquavella,
 President
#### §§ 4284.910-4284.914 [Reserved]
§ 318.13-1 Notice of quarantine. ( a ) Under the authority of section 412 of the Plant Protection Act, the Secretary of Agriculture may prohibit or restrict the movement in interstate commerce of any plant or plant product if the Secretary determines that the prohibition or restriction is necessary to prevent the introduction into the United States or the dissemination within the United States of a plant pest or noxious weed.
( b ) The Secretary has determined that it is necessary to prohibit the interstate movement of cut flowers and fruits and vegetables and plants and portions of plants from Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands except as provided in this subpart or as provided in “Subpart B—Territorial Cotton, Cottonseed, and Cottonseed Products” and “Subpart C—Sand, Soil, or Earth, with Plants from Territories and Districts” in this part.
[74 FR 2775, Jan. 16, 2009, as amended at 74 FR 15641, Apr. 7, 2009; 84 FR 2428, Feb. 7, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TRANSMONTAIGNE INC. FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,523
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  156,690
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    286,602
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               453,248
<PP&E>                                         490,338
<DEPRECIATION>                                (43,549)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 985,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          189,396
<BONDS>                                        427,489
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                           306
<OTHER-SE>                                     368,601<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   985,794
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,148,867
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,148,160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   321<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,488
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,460)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,384)<F3>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,076)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,202)<F4>
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES ($1,100) UNEARNED COMPENSATION
<F2>OTHER INCOME NET OF OTHER EXPENSES
<F3>BENEFIT
<F4>NET LOSS AVAILABLE FOR COMMON STOCKHOLDERS AFTER $2,126 PREFERRED STOCK
DIVIDENDS
</FN>


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ALEXANDER F. THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv349–WS/HTC

SENIOR CHAPLAIN J. FRAMBO,

CHAPLAIN SPARKES,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 14) docketed January 11, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that this

case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with a

court order. Plaintiff has filed no objections to the report and recommendation. 

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No.14) is

Case 4:20-cv-00349-WS-HTC Document 15 Filed 02/10/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint and this action are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with a court order.

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment, stating: "All claims are dismissed

without prejudice."

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of February , 2021.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00349-WS-HTC Document 15 Filed 02/10/21 Page 2 of 2
3.103 Independent pricing.

3.103-1 Solicitation provision.

3.103-2 Evaluating the certification.

3.103-3 The need for further certifications.

Parent topic: Subpart 3.1 - Safeguards
§ 3201.59 Topical pain relief products. ( a ) *Definition.* Products that can be balms, creams and other topical treatments used for the relief of muscle, joint, headache, and nerve pain, as well as sprains, bruises, swelling, and other aches.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 91 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than October 18, 2011, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased topical pain relief products. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased topical pain relief products.
[75 FR 63701, Oct. 18, 2010]
**CH** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. OP 22 - 0472 CASSANDRA A. LARUE,

Petitioner, v. JENNIE HANSEN, Warden,

Respondent . **ORDER** Upon consideration of Respondent ’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Respondent is gran ted an extension of time to and including November 6 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s response.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 3 2022

10/03/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0472
#### § 4279.103 Exception authority.

Section 4279.15 applies to this subpart.
#### § 361.10 Costs and charges.

Unless a user fee is payable under § 354.3 of this chapter, the services of an APHIS inspector during regularly assigned hours of duty and at the usual places of duty will be furnished without cost. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's provisions relating to overtime charges for an APHIS inspector's services are set forth in part 354 of this chapter. The U.S. Department of Agriculture will not be responsible for any costs or charges incident to inspections or compliance with this part, other than for the services of the APHIS inspector during regularly assigned hours of duty and at the usual places of duty. All expenses incurred by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (including travel, per diem or subsistence, and salaries of officers or employees of the Department) in connection with the monitoring of cleaning, labeling, other reconditioning, or destruction of seed, screenings, or refuse under this part shall be reimbursed by the owner or consignee of the seed or screenings.
# L_2021440DE.01001301.xml

| 9.12.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 440/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 440/13

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2021/535 der Kommission vom 31. März 2021 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EU) 2019/2144 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates hinsichtlich einheitlicher Verfahren und technischer Spezifikationen für die Typgenehmigung von Fahrzeugen sowie von Systemen, Bauteilen und selbstständigen technischen Einheiten für diese Fahrzeuge im Hinblick auf ihre allgemeinen Baumerkmale und ihre Sicherheit

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 117 vom 6. April 2021
  )

Seite 154, Anhang XIII, Teil 2, Abschnitt F, Nummer 1, einleitender Satz:

Anstatt:

„Nach Maßgabe der in den folgenden Tabellen enthaltenen zusätzlichen Einschränkungen werden die in den Tabellen I, II und III aufgeführten Einrichtungen bzw. Ausrüstungen bei der Bestimmung bzw. Berechnung der größten Abmessungen berücksichtigt, vorausgesetzt, sie erfüllen die folgenden Anforderungen:“

muss es heißen:

„Nach Maßgabe der in den folgenden Tabellen enthaltenen zusätzlichen Einschränkungen bleiben die in den Tabellen I, II und III aufgeführten Einrichtungen bzw. Ausrüstungen bei der Bestimmung bzw. Berechnung der größten Abmessungen unberücksichtigt, vorausgesetzt, sie erfüllen die folgenden Anforderungen:“.

---