alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 29.9234 Who may obtain certification.

Certification of nonquota tobacco may be requested by an interested party (applicant) by filing an application in accordance with §§ 29.9236 and 29.9237.
<PAGE>
 
EXH 3.1 C

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                              TRANSMONTAIGNE INC.

                                        
TransMontaigne Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation")

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT:

FIRST:  That pursuant to Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law,
resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring said amendment to be
advisable and further declaring that said amendment be presented to the
stockholders of the Corporation pursuant to written consent solicitation to all
stockholders of record as of October 30, 1998 for consideration thereof. The
resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

RESOLVED, that the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be
amended by changing Section 5.1 of Article V thereof so that, as amended, said
Section shall be and read as follows:

     "5.1 The total number of shares that the Corporation shall have
     authority to issue is 82,000,000 shares, of which 80,000,000
     shares shall be common stock, each with a par value of $0.01
     ("Common Stock"), and 2,000,000 shares shall be preferred stock,
     each with a par value of $0.01 ("Preferred Stock")."

SECOND: That said amendment was duly adopted by written consent of the
stockholders given in accordance with the provisions of Section 228 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

THIRD:  That the capital of the Corporation shall not be reduced under or by
reason of said amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TransMontaigne Inc. has caused this Certificate to be
executed by Erik B. Carlson, its authorized officer, on this 18/th/ day of
December, 1998.


                              /s/ Erik B. Carlson
                              ------------------------------------------
                              Erik B. Carlson, Senior Vice President and
                              Corporate Secretary
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1276

DIAN C. KISHUN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security; LISA DE 

SOTO, Deputy Commissioner of Disability Adjudication and 

Review Board,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:08-cv-00614-BO)

Submitted: January 25, 2011 Decided: March 14, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dian C. Kishun, Appellant Pro Se. Robert K. Crowe, SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee 

Astrue. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dian C. Kishun appeals the district court’s order 

granting Astrue’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, 

affirming the decision of the administrative law judge, and 

denying Kishun’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kishun 

v. Astrue, No. 5:08-cv-00614-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 13, 2010). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
Sound Advice, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-27051) on Form S-8 of Sound Advice, Inc. of our report dated March 28, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Sound Advice, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of January 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the two-year period ended January 31, 2000, the seven-month
period ended January 31, 1998 and the year ended June 30, 1997, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the January 31, 2000
annual report on Form 10-K of Sound Advice, Inc.




KPMG LLP
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
April 28, 2000
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2284 

To extend the termination date for the exemption of returning workers from 

the numerical limitations for temporary workers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2006 

Ms. MIKULSKI (for herself, Mr. WARNER, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. KERRY, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. SARBANES, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. 

GREGG, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. SUNUNU, and Mr. DORGAN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To extend the termination date for the exemption of returning workers from the numerical limitations for temporary 

workers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save Our Small and 

5 Seasonal Businesses Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF RETURNING WORKER EXEMPTION. 

7 Section 402(b)(1) of the Save Our Small and Sea8 sonal Businesses Act of 2005 (title IV of division B of 
2 

•S 2284 IS

1 Public Law 109–13; 8 U.S.C. 1184 note) is amended by 

2 striking ‘‘2006’’ and inserting ‘‘2009’’. 

Æ
#### § 3560.9 Reviews and appeals.

Rural Housing Service decisions may be appealed pursuant to 7 CFR part 11.
From: Kacenjar, Allen A. [mailto:allen.kacenjar@squirepb.com]  

Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 9:30 PM

To: Greenberg, Alan (ENRD); 'Marks.Matthew@epa.gov'

Cc: McWilliams, Douglas A.

Subject: Taconite Settlement Documents

Alan and Matt –

As discussed last week, with the few redactions indicated, ArcelorMittal is willing to release its CBI claims on the attached

presentation for the purpose of allowing its use to support the rulemaking efforts called for in our settlement.

As always, I’m happy to discuss any questions either you or EPA’s rulemaking team may have.

Best regards,

The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. Allen A. Kacenjar 

Partner 

Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP 

4900 Key Tower 

127 Public Square 

Cleveland, Ohio 44114 

T +1 216 479 8296 

O +1 216 479 8500 

F +1 216 479 8780 

M +1 216 406 0072 

allen.kacenjar@squirepb.com | squirepattonboggs.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------- 

44 Offices in 21 Countries 

This message is confidential and may be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the 

intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system; 

you must not copy or disclose the contents of this message or any attachment to any other person. 

Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP is part of the international legal practice Squire Patton Boggs, which operates 

worldwide through a number of separate legal entities. Please visit www.squirepattonboggs.com for more information.

#US 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to: 

Kelley, 7:20cv153

Case No. 3:19md2885

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that Plaintiff, Denise Kelley, by and through the 

undersigned counsel of record, hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals 

for the Eleventh Circuit from a Final Judgment entered in favor of Defendants 3M 

Company, 3M Occupational Safety LLC, Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate 

LLC, Aearo LLC, and Aearo Technologies LLC on the 8th day of April, 2022.

Date: May 6, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Trent B. Miracle

Trent B. Miracle

Daniel P. Blouin

John J. Foley

SIMMONS HANLY CONROY

One Court Street

Alton, IL 62002

618-259-2222

618-259-2251 (fax)

tmiracle@simmonsfirm.com

dblouin@simmonsfirm.com

jfoley@simmonsfirm.com

Case 7:20-cv-00153-MCR-GRJ Document 188 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 4
2

Bryan F. Aylstock

Bobby J. “Brad” Bradford

Daniel Thornburgh

Jennifer Hoekstra

AYLSTOCK, WITKIN, KDREIS & 

OVERHOLTZ, PLLC

baylstock@awkolaw.com 

jhoekstra@awkolaw.com

bbradford@awkolaw.com

dthornburgh@awkolaw.com

Jason M. Milne

CLARK, LOVE & HUTSON, PLLC

440 Louisiana St., Ste. 1700

Houston, TX 77002

Phone: (713) 757-1400

Facsimile: (713) 759-1217

jmilne@triallawfirm.com

Caleb A. Seeley

SEEGER WEISS

55 Challenger Road, Sixth Floor

Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660

Phone: 973-693-9100

cseeley@seegerweiss.com

Brett Schwartz, Esq.

Nevada Bar No. 13755

8945 W. Russell Road Ste 300

Las Vegas, Nevada 89148

Bschwartz@messner.com

M. Palmer Lambert (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Claire E. Kreider (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

GAINSBURGH BENJAMIN DAVID 

MEUNIER & WARSHAUER, LLC

2800 Energy Centre, 1100 Poydras Street

New Orleans, LA 70163-2800

Phone: 504-522-2304

plambert@gainsben.com

Case 7:20-cv-00153-MCR-GRJ Document 188 Filed 05/09/22 Page 2 of 4
3

ckreider@gainsben.com

Robert W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Hayden N. Wyatt (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

BAILEY COWAN HECKAMAN PLLC

Four Oaks Place

1360 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 2300

Houston, TX 77056

Phone: 713-425-7100

Fax: 713-425-7101

rcowan@bchlaw.com

hwyatt@bchlaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiff Denise Kelley

Case 7:20-cv-00153-MCR-GRJ Document 188 Filed 05/09/22 Page 3 of 4
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on May 6, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send 

notifications of such filing to the CM/ECF participants registered to receive service 

in this MDL.

/s/ Trent Miracle

Case 7:20-cv-00153-MCR-GRJ Document 188 Filed 05/09/22 Page 4 of 4
§ 3570.65 Processing preapplications and applications. For combination proposals for loan and grant funds, only one preapplication package and one application package should be prepared and submitted. Preapplications and applications for grants will be developed in accordance with applicable portions of 7 CFR 1942.2, 1942.104, and 3575.52. ( a ) *Preapplications.* Applicants will file an original and one copy of “Application for Federal Assistance (For Construction),” with the appropriate Agency office. This form is available in all Agency offices. The preapplication and supporting documentation are used to determine applicant eligibility and priority for funding. ( 1 ) All preapplications shall be accompanied by: ( i ) Evidence of applicant's legal existence and authority; and
( ii ) Appropriate clearinghouse agency comments.
( b ) *Application processing.* Upon notification on “Notice of Preapplication Review Action” that the applicant is eligible for CFG funding, the applicant will be provided forms and instructions for filing a complete application. The forms required for a complete application, including the following, will be submitted to the processing office by the applicant: ( 1 ) Updated “Application for Federal Assistance (For Construction).”
( 2 ) Financial feasibility report.
( c ) *Discontinuing the processing of the application.* If the applicant fails to submit the application and related material by the date shown on “Notice of Preapplication Review Action” (normally 60 days from the date of this form), the Agency will discontinue consideration of the application.
# L_2021074EN.01000101.xml

| 4.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 74/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 74/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/381

of 25 February 2021

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Escavèche de Chimay’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Belgium’s application to register the name ‘Escavèche de Chimay’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Belgium’s application to register the name ‘Escavèche de Chimay’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Escavèche de Chimay’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Escavèche de Chimay’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Escavèche de Chimay’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.7. Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 February 2021.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 340, 13.10.2020, p. 12.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      Three Months Ended
                                                                                --------------------------------
                                                                                March 29,              March 30,
                                                                                  1997                   1996
                                                                                ---------              ---------
                                                                          (In thousands, except per share amounts)
<S>                                                                              <C>                    <C>
CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE:
PRIMARY:
Weighted average common shares outstanding during the period..................     34,068                 32,816
Dilutive effect of stock options using the treasury stock method..............      1,494                  3,299
                                                                                --------------------------------
    Total common equivalent shares............................................     35,562                 36,115
                                                                                --------------------------------
Net income....................................................................    $ 3,075                $ 7,469
Net income per share..........................................................    $  0.09                $  0.21

FULLY DILUTED:(1)
Weighted average common shares outstanding during the period..................     34,068                 32,816
Diluted effect of stock options using the treasury stock method...............      1,494                  3,299
                                                                                --------------------------------
    Total common equivalent shares............................................     35,562                 36,115
                                                                                --------------------------------
Net income....................................................................    $ 3,075                $ 7,469
Net income per share..........................................................    $  0.09                $  0.21
</TABLE>

-------------
(1) This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item
    601(b)(11) although not required by Footnote 2 to Paragraph 14 of APB 
    Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.
3.101 Standards of conduct.

3.101-1 General.

3.101-2 Solicitation and acceptance of gratuities by Government personnel.

3.101-3 Agency regulations.

Parent topic: Subpart 3.1 - Safeguards
#### § 407.14 Area risk protection insurance for peanuts.

The peanut crop insurance provisions for Area Risk Protection Insurance for the 2014 and succeeding crop years are as follows:

# UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

# Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

## Area Risk Protection Insurance

### Peanut Crop Insurance Provisions

### 1. Definitions

*Harvest.* The completion of digging and threshing and removal of peanuts from the field.

*Planted acreage.* In addition to the definition contained in the Area Risk Protection Insurance Basic Provisions, peanuts must initially be planted in a row pattern which permits mechanical cultivation, or that allows the peanuts to be cared for in a manner recognized by agricultural experts as a good farming practice. Acreage planted in any other manner will not be insurable unless otherwise provided by the Special Provisions.

### 2. Insured Crop

(a) The insured crop will be all peanuts:

(1) Grown on insurable acreage in the county listed on the accepted application;

(2) Properly planted by the final planting date and reported on or before the acreage reporting date;

(3) Planted with the intent to be harvested as peanuts; and

(4) Not planted into an established grass or legume or interplanted with another crop.

### 3. Payment Dates

(a) Unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions the final county revenues and or final county yields will be determined prior to June 16 following the crop year.

(b) If an indemnity is due, unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions we will issue any payment to you prior to July 16 and following the determination of the final county revenue or the final county yield, as applicable.

### 4. Program Dates

| State and county | Cancellation and termination dates | Contract change date |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Jackson, Victoria, Goliad, Bee, Live Oak, McMullen, La Salle, and Dimmit Counties, Texas and all Texas Counties lying south thereof | January 15 | November 30. |
| El Paso, Hudspeth, Culberson, Reeves, Loving, Winkler, Ector, Upton, Reagan, Sterling, Coke, Tom Green, Concho, McCulloch, San Saba, Mills, Hamilton, Bosque, Johnson, Tarrant, Wise, and Cooke Counties, Texas, and all Texas counties south and east thereof; and all other states except New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Virginia | February 28 | November 30. |
| New Mexico; Oklahoma; Virginia; and all other Texas Counties | March 15 | November 30. |
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

GURPREET MICHAEL SINGH,

A# 065–998–045,

Petitioner,

v. 4:20cv345–WS/MAF

WILLIAM BARR, et al.,

Respondents.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 4) docketed July 10, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that this action

be transferred to the Middle District of Florida. Plaintiff has filed no objections to

the report and recommendation.

The court having reviewed the matter, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 10) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. The clerk shall TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court

Case 4:20-cv-00345-WS-MAF Document 5 Filed 08/12/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division, for all further

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of August , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00345-WS-MAF Document 5 Filed 08/12/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Report of
Material Sciences Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Clifford D. Nastas, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



October 10, 2006By:

/s/ Clifford D. NastasClifford D. NastasChief Executive Officer


In connection with the Report, I, James M. Froisland, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief
Information Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



October 10, 2006By:

/s/ James M. FroislandJames M. FroislandSenior Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer, Chief InformationOfficer and Corporate Secretary




38