alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 4279.150 Feasibility studies.

A feasibility study, by a qualified independent consultant acceptable to the Agency, is required for new businesses. The Agency may require a feasibility study for existing businesses when the project will significantly affect the borrower's operations, and cash flow from the existing facility is not sufficient to service the new debt. At a minimum, a feasibility study must include an evaluation of the economic, market, technical, financial, and management feasibility and an executive summary that reaches an overall conclusion as to the business' chance of success. The income approach of an appraisal is not an acceptable feasibility study.
§ 3.53 Procedures. ( a ) USDA has determined to pursue administrative wage garnishment of USDA debtors by referral of nontax legally enforceable debts to Treasury for issuance of garnishment orders by Treasury or its contractors.
( b ) As specified in § 3.11, agencies must notify debtors of their intent to pursue garnishment of their disposable pay through referral of the debt to Treasury for issuance of an administrative wage garnishment order and provide debtors with the opportunity for review of the existence of the debt under subpart F of this part within 60 days of the date of the demand letter.
( c ) Upon expiration of the 60-day period for review, or upon completion of a review under subpart F of this part that upholds the agency's determination of the debt, USDA will transfer the debt for collection through administrative wage garnishment as well as other means through cross-servicing or centralized administrative offset.
( d ) If Treasury elects to pursue collection through administrative wage garnishment, Treasury, or its contractor, will notify the debtor of its intent to initiate garnishment proceedings and provide the debtor with the opportunity to inspect and copy agency records related to the debt, enter into a repayment agreement, or request a hearing as to the existence or amount of the debt or the terms of the proposed repayment schedule under the proposed garnishment order, in accordance with 31 CFR 285.11.
( e ) If the debtor requests a hearing at any time, Treasury will forward the request to the USDA creditor agency to which the debt is owed, and the creditor agency will contact the Office of the CFO (OCFO) for selection of a hearing official. The issuance of proposed garnishment orders by Treasury will not be subject to appeal to NAD under part 11 of this title. Hearings will be conducted in accordance with 31 CFR 285.11(f).
( f ) OCFO will provide a copy of the hearing official's final decision to Treasury for implementation with respect to the subject garnishment order.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 316]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ316.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 1202]]

Public Law 108-316
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 
  Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 
  Williamson County, Texas, Water Recycling and Reuse Project, and for 
         other purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 5, 2004 -  [H.R. 1732]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: Williamson County Water Recycling Act of 2004. 43 USC 
            390h note.>> PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ``Williamson 
County Water Recycling Act of 2004''.
    (b) In General.--The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (Title XVI of Public Law 102-575; 43 U.S.C. 390h et 
seq.) is amended by inserting after section 1635 the following new 
section:

``SEC. 1636. <<NOTE: 43 USC 390h-17a.>> WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, WATER 
            RECYCLING AND REUSE PROJECT.

    ``(a) Authorization.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the Lower 
Colorado River Authority, Texas, is authorized to participate in the 
design, planning, and construction of permanent facilities to reclaim 
and reuse water in Williamson County, Texas.
    ``(b) Cost Share.--The Federal share of the costs of the project 
described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total 
cost.
    ``(c) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not provide funds for the 
operation and maintenance of the project described in subsection (a).''.

[[Page 118 STAT. 1203]]

SEC. 2. CLERICAL AMENDMENT.

    The table of sections in section 2 of the Reclamation Projects 
Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4600.>> is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1635 the 
following:

``Sec. 1636. Williamson County, Texas, Water Recycling and Reuse 
           Project.''.

    Approved October 5, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1732:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108-364 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 108-288 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 149 (2003):
                                    Nov. 17, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 150 (2004):
                                    Sept. 15, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
2004-0485.

#### State v. Ketterer.

Butler C.P. No. CR-2003-03-0309. On motion for leave to file supplemental briefing to address sentencing issues. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                               IKOS SYSTEMS INC.
                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                   (in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                     December 28,  December 30,
                                                         1996         1995
                                                     ------------  ------------
<S>                                                  <C>           <C>
Net income                                                 $2,175       $1,375
                                                           ======       ====== 
Number of shares used in computing per share amounts:                         
   Weighted average common shares outstanding               8,241        6,886
   Common equivalent shares attributable to stock                             
    options (treasury stock method)                           615          633

                                                           ------       ------ 
Total weighted average common shares outstanding            8,856        7,519
                                                           ======       ====== 

Net income per share                                        $0.25        $0.18
                                                           ======       ====== 
</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

TAJHON WILSON, 

FDOC Inmate No. R21310, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5468/LAC/EMT 

G. CULPEPPER, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________/ 

ORDER

 The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on June 23, 

2021 (ECF No. 28). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 

 1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

28) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 

 2. “Plaintiff’s Motion to Voluntary Dismissal [sic] with Prejudice” (ECF 

No. 27) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

Case 3:20-cv-05468-LC-EMT Document 29 Filed 07/23/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 

Case No.: 3:20cv5468/LAC/EMT 

 3. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 20) is 

DENIED as moot. 

 4. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

order and close the case. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of July, 2021. 

 

 LACEY A. COLLIER 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier 

Case 3:20-cv-05468-LC-EMT Document 29 Filed 07/23/21 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of L. B. R. Enterprises, Inc., Doing Business as Tuey’s, Petitioner, v New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the *872respondent, dated December 11, 1979, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of suffering or permitting the licensed premises to become disorderly in that it suffered or permitted an altercation to occur therein, and imposed a penalty of a 60-day suspension, 30 days forthwith and 30 days deferred, and a bond claim of $500. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. The determination was supported by substantial evidence. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Rabin and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:03cr60-SPM

SHARON SHERMAN HALL

a/k/a SHARON P. SHERMAN,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER CONTINUING VIOLATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE HEARING

For good cause shown, Defendant’s Motion to Continue Violation of

Supervised Release Hearing (doc. 35) is granted. The hearing is rest for 1:30

p.m. on March 17, 2008, at the United States Courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of February, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cr-00060-SPM-WCS Document 36 Filed 02/15/08 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50950 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. PATRICK JONES Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:07-CR-22-2
Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Patrick Jones appeals the sentence imposed following hisjury conviction for possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine within 1,000 feet of a protected location. He argues that the district court’s drug quantity calculation
was erroneously based on the unreliable tri al testimony of Sharon Jones. In the absence of rebuttal evidence from Jones, the district court correctly relied on the presentence report in calculating drug quantity. S ee United States United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 29, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50950

2 v. Gracia, 983 F.2d 625, 630 (5th Cir. 1993). Additionally, Sharon Jones’s testimony supports the district court’s calculation; her testimony was not ambiguous regarding the quantity ofcrack the Joneses sold versus the quantity they consumed for personal use, it established that theJoneseswere heavy users of crack cocaine and used a significant portion of the profits from its sale to purchase more drugs, and it did not support Jones’s allegation that Sharon Jones suffered from a mental illness that affected the credibi lity of her testimony. The district court’s drug quantity calculation therefore was not error, plain or otherwise. S ee United States v. Betancourt, 422 F.3d 240, 246 (5th Cir. 2005).Jones has moved pro se for “clarification” and appointment ofnewcounsel, raising ineffective assistance ofcounsel claims. Ineffective assistance of counsel claims generally cannot be addressed on direct appeal unless they have been presented to the district court. Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500, 505 (2003); United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Jones’s ineffective assistance claims are therefore best addressed on 28 U.S.C. § 2255 review. Insofar as Jones requested the appointment of new appellate counsel, he did so after counsel had filed a brief; therefore his request is untimely. Cf. United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND APPOINTMENT OF NEW COUNSEL DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70722-70723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN: 0648-XA044


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council's (Council) VMS/
Enforcement Committee will meet to consider actions affecting New 
England fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ).

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 7, 2010 at 9:30 
a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Sheraton Harborside Hotel, 
250 Market Street, Portsmouth, NH 03801; telephone: (603) 431-2300; 
fax: (603) 433-5649.
    Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

[[Page 70723]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The items of discussion in the committee's 
agenda are as follows:
    The Committee will develop recommendations on proposed penalty 
schedule. Other business may be discussed.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically identified in this notice and any issues 
arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action 
under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's 
intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Paul J. Howard (see ADDRESSES) at least 5 days 
prior to the meeting date.

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: November 15, 2010.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-29082 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
# 4.1902 Applicability.

This subpart applies to all *acquisitions*, including *acquisitions* of *commercial products* or *commercial services* other than commercially available off-the-shelf items, when a contractor's *information system**may* contain *Federal contract information*.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 4.19 - Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems
From: <Hall.Josh@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <Thomas.Finseth@erg.com>

CC: <Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov>, <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

Date: 1/25/2010 3:27 PM

Subject: Fw: Cardinal Site Visit

Attachments: CD NPDES Fact Sheet 08.pdf; Cardinal Water Balance 11-2008.pdf; pic05556.gif

FYI

----- Forwarded by Josh Hall/DC/USEPA/US on 01/25/2010 03:22 PM -----

 

 From: twlohner@aep.com 

 

 To: Josh Hall/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

 Date: 01/25/2010 10:26 AM 

 

 Subject: Re: Cardinal Site Visit 

 

Josh, as you requested, I am providing a Cardinal Plant flow diagram, as

well as the most recent NPDES fact sheet (attached). I will also be

sending you hard copies of the FGD wastewater treatment engineering

diagrams/reports and water balance/flow diagrams. For now, I ask that

you please keep the FGD wastewater treatment plant information

confidential. If this becomes problematic, it can be discussed during

you visit on February 2nd.

By the way, have you finalized your agenda for the site visit? Knowing

the anticipated times of your arrival and departure, lunch plans, etc.,

would be helpful. Also, can you give me an address for the hard copies?

Tim

(See attached file: CD NPDES Fact Sheet 08.pdf)(See attached file:

Cardinal Water Balance 11-2008.pdf)(Embedded image moved to file:

pic05556.gif)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 73082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Notice of Open Meeting of the Advisory Committee of the Export-
Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank)

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee was established by Public Law 98-181, 
November 30, 1983, to advise the Export-Import Bank on its programs and 
to provide comments for inclusion in the reports of the Export-Import 
Bank of the United States to Congress.

TIME AND PLACE: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. A 
break for lunch will be at the expense of the attendee. Security 
processing will be necessary for reentry into the building. The meeting 
will be held at Ex-Im Bank in the Main Conference Room 1143, 811 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

AGENDA: Agenda items include a briefing of the Advisory Committee 
members on challenges for 2011, their roles and responsibilities and an 
ethics briefing.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to public participation, 
and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or 
comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) 
before or after the meeting. If you plan to attend, a photo ID must be 
presented at the guard's desk as part of the clearance process into the 
building, and you may contact Susan Houser to be placed on an attendee 
list. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such as a sign language 
interpreter) or other special accommodations, please contact, prior to 
December 6, 2010, Susan Houser, Room 1273, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20571. Voice: (202) 565-3232.

FURTHER INFORMATION: For further information, contact Susan Houser, 
Room 1273, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3232.

Jonathan Cordone,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-29919 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
9.110-1           Definitions.       As used in this section—          *Covered agency* means–(1)The Department of Defense;                                                                     (2)Any department or agency for which regular appropriations are made in a Department of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act;                                                                     (3)The Department of Homeland Security;                                                                     (4)The National Nuclear Security Administration of the Department of Energy;                                                                     (5)The Department of Transportation; or                                                                     (6)The Central Intelligence Agency.                                                                                          *Institution of higher* education means an institution that meets the requirements of 20 U.S.C. 1001 and includes all sub-elements of such an institution.    **Parent topic:** 9.110 Reserve Officer Training Corps and military recruiting on campus.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 72826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29724]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 20, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291: 1. Bitterroot Holding Company, Lolo, Montana; to acquire 
additional voting shares of West One Bank, Kalispell, Montana. Comments 
regarding this application must be received not later than December 13, 
2010.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Carlile Bancshares, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Treaty 
Oak Bank, Austin, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 22, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-29724 Filed 11-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 155 East Tropicana, LLC, a Nevadalimited-liability company and 155 East Tropicana Finance Corp., a Nevadacorporation (collectively, the “Company”) for the three months ended September 30,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Deborah J. Pierce, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                 The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                 The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Deborah J. Pierce   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Deborah  J. Pierce,      |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |
| November 13,  2009  |   |

 

 

The foregoing certificationsare being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and are not being filedas part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
#### §§ 4279.145-4279.149 [Reserved]