alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[108th Congress Public Law 397]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ397.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 2251]]

Public Law 108-397
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
    10 West Prospect Street in Nanuet, New York, as the ``Anthony I. 
Lombardi Memorial Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 30, 2004 -  [H.R. 
                                4618]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10 West 
Prospect Street in Nanuet, New York, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Anthony I. Lombardi Memorial Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Anthony I. Lombardi Memorial 
Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 30, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4618:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Sept. 7, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 10, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 1 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 2 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 3 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 4 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 5 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 6 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 7 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 8 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 9 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 10 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 11 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 12 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 13 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 14 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 15 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 16 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 17 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 18 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 19 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 20 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 21 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 22 of 23
Case 4:99-cv-00483-RH Document 3 Filed 01/19/00 Page 23 of 23
§ 3570.263 Eligible project purposes. ( a ) Grant funds and any matching funds may be used by Technical Assistance Providers to: ( 1 ) Assist communities in identifying and planning for community facility needs;
( 2 ) Identify resources to finance community facility needs from public and private sources;
( 3 ) Prepare reports and surveys necessary to request financial assistance to develop community facilities;
( 4 ) Prepare applications for Agency financial assistance;
( 5 ) Improve the management, including financial management, related to the operation of community facilities; or
( 6 ) Assist with other areas of need identified by the Secretary.
( b ) Grant Funds and any matching funds may be used by Ultimate Recipients only to prepare reports and surveys necessary to request financial assistance to develop community facilities. Applicants applying as Ultimate Recipients will be limited to this purpose.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2573 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow qualified scholarship 

funding corporations to access tax-exempt financing for alternative private student loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2013 

Mr. FLORES (for himself and Mr. CUELLAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow qualified scholarship funding corporations to access tax-exempt financing for alternative private student loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Loan Oppor5 tunity Act of 2013’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2573 IH

1 SEC. 2. QUALIFIED SCHOLARSHIP FUNDING CORPORATION 

2 TAX-EXEMPT FINANCING FOR ALTERNATIVE 

3 PRIVATE STUDENT LOANS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 150(d) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik6 ing ‘‘established and’’ and ‘‘incurred under the Higher 

7 Education Act of 1965’’ in subparagraph (A) thereof. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of 

10 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
1The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District

of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

2The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-3708

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Northern District of Iowa.

*

Juan Diego Molina, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: September 12, 2000

Filed: September 28, 2000 

___________

Before BOWMAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,1 District Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Juan Diego Molina, convicted after trial by jury on three counts of distribution

of methamphetamine and one count of using a communication facility in the

commission of a drug offense, appeals both his conviction and the resulting sentence.

He argues that the District Court2 erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal,
-2-

claiming entrapment as a matter of law. As to his sentence, he argues that the District

Court committed plain error in applying a two-level enhancement for obstruction of

justice.

Molina's entrapment argument must fail, inasmuch as the evidence does not

clearly show entrapment as a matter of law. In particular, there is testimony from the

government's cooperator, one Burdette Twiford, that prior to any request by Twiford

to purchase drugs from Molina, Molina asked Twiford whether Twiford wanted to buy

thirty pounds of marijuana that Molina's brother was trying to sell. Thereafter, Twiford

asked Molina whether Molina could get him pound quantities of methamphetamine,

which Molina was able to do and did do, delivering a pound of methamphetamine. On

the basis of this and other evidence in the trial record, the case is distinguishable from

United States v. Brooks, 215 F.3d 842 (8th Cir. 2000), and other cases in which

entrapment as a matter of law has been found. We are satisfied that the government

presented a submissible case and that Molina's motion for a judgment of acquittal was

correctly denied.

The imposition of the two-level sentencing enhancement for obstruction of

justice, to which Molina did not object, was not plain error. At the sentencing hearing,

and as part of an agreement with the government to a total offense level of thirty-four,

Molina withdrew all objections to the pre-sentence investigation report, including his

objection to the obstruction of justice enhancement. Molina thus has waived the issue.

Molina's conviction and sentence are affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 3430.404 Project types and priorities.

For each RFA, NIFA may develop and include the appropriate project types and priority areas based on stakeholder input and as deemed appropriate by NIFA. Duration and amount of grants may vary depending on the type of project.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

 <S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,050,129
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      155,636
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,952,334
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,158,099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,453,766
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,703,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,158,099
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,651,557
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,361,628
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,289,929
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,289,929
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6234
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WALTER EUGENE MOORE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Russell A. Eliason, Magistrate Judge. (CR-89-218-G, CA-96-369-2) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter Eugene Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's supplemental recommendation, recommending denial of Appellant's motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdictionbecause the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ex. 21

Pioneer Railcorp Subsidiaries:

Alabama & Florida Railway Co., Inc.
Alabama Railroad Co.
Decatur Junction Railway Co.
Fort Smith Railroad Co.
Keokuk Junction Railway Co.
Minnesota Central Railroad Co. 
Mississippi Central Railroad Co.
Pioneer Railroad Equipment Co., Ltd.
Pioneer Railroad Services, Inc. (PRS).
Pioneer Resources, Inc.
Pioneer Air, Inc.
Rochelle Railroad Co.
Shawnee Terminal Railway Company 
Vandalia Railroad Company
Wabash & Western Railway Co. d/b/a Michigan Southern Railroad
West Michigan Railroad Co.
|   | 1.     | I                have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A                of                ANTs software inc. (the “Company”);                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | 2.     | Based                on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form                10-K/A                does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit                to state                a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of                the                circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading                with                respect to the period covered by this                report; |

| Date:                ** **June 27, 2007 |   |                                                               |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                         | By:    | /s/Joseph                Kozak                                     |
|                                         |   | Joseph                Kozak, Chief Executive Officer and President |
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2540 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2540

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the authority of the 
          Secretary of Veterans Affairs to hire psychiatrists.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2013

 Mr. Cartwright (for himself, Mr. Rooney, Ms. Kaptur, Ms. Jenkins, Mr. 
    Cassidy, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Ms. Shea-Porter, Mr. Chabot, and Ms. 
  Duckworth) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the authority of the 
          Secretary of Veterans Affairs to hire psychiatrists.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expedited Hiring for VA Trained 
Psychiatrists Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF PSYCHIATRISTS BY VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 74 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 7406 the following new section:
``Sec. 7406A. Appointment of certain psychiatrists who complete 
              residencies
    ``(a) In General.--(1) Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary may 
appoint, without regard to civil service or classification laws a 
psychiatrist who completes a residency under section 7406 of this title 
to a position under section 7401 or 7405 immediately after such 
residency, if the psychiatrist meets the qualifications established in 
regulations prescribed by the Secretary for such position.
    ``(2) The Secretary may begin the process of appointing a 
psychiatrist under paragraph (1) before the psychiatrist completes a 
residency.
    ``(b) Positions Permitted.--The Secretary may appoint a 
psychiatrist under subsection (a) if the position to which the 
psychiatrist is appointed has been unfilled for not less than 35 days 
as of the date of the appointment.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
7406 the following new item:

``7406A. Appointment of certain psychiatrists who complete 
                            residencies.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oakmont Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, (the Report), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael C. Azar, President, Secretary, Principal Accounting Officer and a Director of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 14, 2007



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael C. Azar                                            
|Michael C. Azar                                                
|President, Secretary, Principal Accounting Officer and Director
#### § 29.6097 Rule 11.

The use of any grade may be restricted by the Director during any marketing season when it is found that the grade is not needed or appears in insufficient volume to justify its use.
# 9.409 Contract clause.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.209-6, Protecting the Government’s Interests when Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for *Debarment*, in *solicitations* and contracts where the contract value exceeds $35,000.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 9.4 - Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility
#### In the Matter of Frederick M. Dell, Jr., an Attorney, Respondent. New York State Bar Association, Petitioner.

Third Department,

October 15, 1969.

*501
      *Paul C. Gouldin*for petitioner.

*Joseph F. Barbano*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Respondent was admitted to practice on December 9, 1957 in the First Judicial Department. He is charged with professional misconduct in five specifications. The Referee appointed to take testimony reports that four of the five charges have been sustained by a fair preponderance of the evidence; and the petitioner has moved to confirm the Referee’s report.

Of the four charges which the Referee sustained, respondent takes no exception to the findings in charges II and V. The evidence in charge II establishes that respondent collected $2,100 for a client on October 20, 1966 which he refused to pay over, and, indeed, denied to his client that the account had been collected, until June 21, 1968, three days prior to the institution of the present proceeding. The evidence in charge V establishes that on March 7, 1968 respondent was convicted after a trial of the misdemeanor of selling alcoholic beverages to two boys of minor age.

Of the contested charges, the Referee has found, with respect to charge I, that respondent breached an escrow agreement in August, 1966 in a real property closing, and converted $143.95 of the escrow fund. With respect to charge III, the Referee reports that in September, 1966 respondent breached a second escrow agreement and converted $451.90 which had been paid to him by a client to make restitution on a bad check. The creditors for whom the escrow funds were created in both transactions remain unpaid.

The Referee’s findings in each of the specifications have ample support in the record, and his report should be confirmed in all respects. ~ The proof. of guilt is clear and compelling. The gravity and diversity of respondent’s derelictions in his professional and fiduciary responsibilities are likewise clear and *502require no elaboration. The public interest requires that his license to practice law be revoked.

The réspondent should be disbarred.

Heblihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley* Jr., Gbeenélott and Cooke, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           8,718
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,113
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,852
<PP&E>                                           9,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,925
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               478,802
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  418,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,349
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,305
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,908
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,397
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,397
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
#### §§ 3565.11-3565.12 [Reserved]