alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10352

Summary Calendar

FERNANDO PATINO,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:06-CV-309

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Fernando Patino, Texas prisoner # 1153575, appeals from the dismissal

of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his murder conviction. This court

granted a certificate of appealability on the issue whether the district court erred

by dismissing Patino’s claims that prospective jurors James Estes and John

Grimland were biased and should have been excused for cause.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 8, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-10352 Document: 00511501979 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2011
No. 10-10352

A federal court must give deference to a state habeas court’s determination

of the merits of the prisoner’s claims, unless the state decision “was contrary to,

or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as

determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,” or “was based on an

unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the

State court proceeding.” § 2254(d)(1) & (2). We review the district court’s

findings of fact for clear error and issues of law de novo. Propes v. Quarterman,

573 F.3d 225, 227 (5th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3272 (2010).

Even if Estes and Grimland were biased, Patino’s constitutional rights

were not violated because he used peremptory challenges to strike both of them

from jury service. SeeUnited States v. Martinez-Salazar, 528 U.S. 304, 307, 311

(2000); United States v. Sanchez-Hernandez, 507 F.3d 826, 830 (5th Cir. 2007).

His arguments that his case falls within the exceptions to Martinez-Salizar are

entirely conclusory. See Ross v. Estelle, 694 F.2d 1008, 1012 (5th Cir. 1983). He

fails to show that he is entitled to habeas relief. See § 2254(d)(1) & (2);

Harrington v. Richter, 131 S. Ct. 770, 786-87 (2011).

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 10-10352 Document: 00511501979 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/08/2011
# L_2020326EN.01000101.xml

| 8.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 326/1

---

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2020/1413

of 29 June 2020

correcting the Swedish language version of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1), and in particular Article 53(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Swedish language version of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 contains an erroneous value in the first and second rows of Category Chronic 3, in point (b)(iii) in Table 4.1.0 of Annex I. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Swedish language version of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 contains an erroneous value in the first and second rows of Category Chronic 3, in point (b)(iii) in Table 4.1.0 of Annex I.

| (2) | The Swedish language version of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Swedish language version of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

(does not concern the English version)

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 June 2020.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 353, 31.12.2008, p. 1.

1

---
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2478 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Tetraethylthiuram Disulfide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2006 

Mr. DEWINE (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Tetraethylthiuram 

Disulfide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TETRAETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.03 Tetraethylthiuram Disulfide 

(CAS No. 97–77–8) (provided for in subheading 

2930.30.60) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 2478 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
§ 356.9 Filing of documents. ( a ) Any document required by this subpart to be filed or served within a certain period of time, will be considered filed or served as of the time of receipt by the party with or upon whom filing or service is required.
( b ) Saturdays, Sundays, and federal holidays shall be included in computing the time allowed for the filing or serving of any document or paper; except that when such time expires on a Saturday, Sunday or federal holiday, such period shall be extended to include the next following business day.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000755465
<NAME>                        SANDATA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    $

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     AUG-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                           814,516
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,028,560
<ALLOWANCES>                                     451,640
<INVENTORY>                                       38,119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,736,223
<PP&E>                                        17,076,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                 8,643,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                13,085,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,364,095
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           2,481
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,252,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  13,085,546
<SALES>                                        4,074,124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,202,469
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,104,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                48,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   49,549
<INCOME-TAX>                                      20,515
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               29,034
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      29,034
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .01



</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2485 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend programs assisting homeless 

veterans and other veterans with special needs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2013 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend programs 

assisting homeless veterans and other veterans with special needs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Homeless Vet5 erans Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS ASSISTING HOMELESS 

7 VETERANS AND OTHER VETERANS WITH SPE8 CIAL NEEDS. 

9 (a) HOMELESS VETERANS REINTEGRATION PRO10 GRAMS.—Section 2021(e)(1)(F) of title 38, United States 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2485 IH

1 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘2014’’. 

3 (b) REFERRAL AND COUNSELING SERVICES FOR

4 VETERANS AT RISK OF HOMELESSNESS WHO ARE

5 TRANSITIONING FROM CERTAIN INSTITUTIONS.—Section 

6 2023(d) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘2014’’. 

8 (c) TREATMENT FOR SERIOUSLY MENTALLY ILL

9 AND HOMELESS VETERANS.—Section 2031(b) of such 

10 title is amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2014’’. 

11 (d) HOUSING ASSISTANCE FOR HOMELESS VET12 ERANS.—Section 2041(c) of such title is amended by 

13 striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2014’’. 

14 (e) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR SUPPORTIVE SERV15 ICES FOR VERY LOW-INCOME VETERAN FAMILIES IN

16 PERMANENT HOUSING.—Section 2044(e)(1) is amended 

17 by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

18 ‘‘(F) $300,000,000 for fiscal year 2014.’’. 

19 (f) GRANT PROGRAM FOR HOMELESS VETERANS

20 WITH SPECIAL NEEDS.—Section 2061(d)(1) is amended 

21 by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2014’’. 

22 (g) ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON HOMELESS VET23 ERANS.—Section 2066(d) is amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ 

24 and inserting ‘‘2014’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 3560.350 OMB control number.

The information collection requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and have been assigned OMB control number 0575-0189. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to vary from 15 minutes to 18 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. A person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2293 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2293

To authorize a military construction project for the construction of an 
 advanced training skills facility at Brooke Army Medical Center, San 
                            Antonio, Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2006

Mr. Lieberman (for himself, Mr. Frist, Mr. Nelson of Florida, and Mrs. 
  Hutchison) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize a military construction project for the construction of an 
 advanced training skills facility at Brooke Army Medical Center, San 
                            Antonio, Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FOR 
              CONSTRUCTION OF TRAINING SKILLS FACILITY.

    (a) Military Construction Project Authorized.--The Secretary of 
Defense may carry out a military construction project for the 
construction of an advanced training skills facility at Brooke Army 
Medical Facility, San Antonio, Texas, for the purpose of serving 
severely injured military personnel.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated for fiscal year 2007 for military construction of the 
Department of Defense $5,500,000 to defray the cost of the military 
construction project authorized by subsection (a). Such amount is in 
addition to any other amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
year 2007 for military construction of the Department of Defense.
                                 <all>
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2470 

To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau of Reclamation 

within the A & B Irrigation District in the State of Idaho. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2006 

Mr. CRAIG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau 

of Reclamation within the A & B Irrigation District 

in the State of Idaho. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Southern Idaho Bu5 reau of Reclamation Repayment Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EARLY REPAYMENT OF A&B IRRIGATION DISTRICT 

7 CONSTRUCTION COSTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 213 of 

9 the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm), 

10 any landowner within the A&B Irrigation District in the 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 2470 IS

1 State (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘District’’) may repay, 

2 at any time, the construction costs of District project fa3 cilities that are allocated to land of the landowner within 

4 the District. 

5 (b) APPLICABILITY OF FULL-COST PRICING LIMITA6 TIONS.—On discharge, in full, of the obligation for repay7 ment of all construction costs described in subsection (a) 

8 that are allocated to each parcel of land of the landowner 

9 in the District, the parcels of land shall not be subject 

10 to the ownership and full-cost pricing limitations under 

11 Federal reclamation law (the Act of June 17, 1902 (32 

12 Stat. 388, chapter 1093), and Acts supplemental to and 

13 amendatory of that Act (43 U.S.C. 371 et seq.), including 

14 the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (13 U.S.C. 390aa 

15 et seq.). 

16 (c) CERTIFICATION.—On request of a landowner that 

17 has repaid, in full, the construction costs described in sub18 section (a), the Secretary of the Interior shall provide to 

19 the landowner a certificate described in section 213(b)(1) 

20 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 

21 390mm(b)(1)). 

22 (d) EFFECT.—Nothing in this Act— 

23 (1) modifies any contractual rights under, or 

24 amends or reopens, the reclamation contract between 

25 the District and the United States; or 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 2470 IS

1 (2) modifies any rights, obligations, or relation2 ships between the District and landowners in the 

3 District under Idaho State law. 

Æ 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### § 360.100 Definitions.

As used in this part, words in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural and vice versa, as the case may require.

*Administrator.* The Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, or any individual authorized to act for the Administrator.

*APHIS.* The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

*Department.* The U.S. Department of Agriculture.

*Interstate.* From one State into or through any other State; or within the District of Columbia, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, or any other territory or possession of the United States.

*Move.* To carry, enter, import, mail, ship, or transport; to aid, abet, cause, or induce the carrying, entering, importing, mailing, shipping, or transporting; to offer to carry, enter, import, mail, ship, or transport; to receive to carry, enter, import, mail, ship, or transport; to release into the environment; or to allow any of the activities described in this definition.

*Noxious weed.* Any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health, or the environment.

*Permit.* A written authorization, including by electronic methods, by the Administrator to move plants, plant products, biological control organisms, plant pests, noxious weeds, or articles under conditions prescribed by the Administrator.

*Person.* Any individual, partnership, corporation, association, joint venture, or other legal entity.

*Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs.* The Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the Department.

*Responsible person.* The person who has control over and will maintain control over the movement of the noxious weed and assure that all conditions contained in the permit and requirements in this part are complied with. A responsible person must be at least 18 years of age and must be a legal resident of the United States or designate an agent who is at least 18 years of age and a legal resident of the United States.

*State.* Any of the several States of the United States, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, or any other territory or possession of the United States.

*Taxon (taxa).* Any grouping within botanical nomenclature, such as family, genus, species, or cultivar.

*Through the United States.* From and to places outside the United States.

*United States.* All of the States.

[41 FR 49988, Nov. 12, 1976, as amended at 75 FR 68953, Nov. 102, 2010]
Case 4:99-cv-00317-RH Document 241 Filed 09/28/00 Page 1 of 7
Case 4:99-cv-00317-RH Document 241 Filed 09/28/00 Page 2 of 7
Case 4:99-cv-00317-RH Document 241 Filed 09/28/00 Page 3 of 7
Case 4:99-cv-00317-RH Document 241 Filed 09/28/00 Page 4 of 7
Case 4:99-cv-00317-RH Document 241 Filed 09/28/00 Page 5 of 7
Case 4:99-cv-00317-RH Document 241 Filed 09/28/00 Page 6 of 7
Case 4:99-cv-00317-RH Document 241 Filed 09/28/00 Page 7 of 7
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ben Furgang, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Brink, J.

Appeal from a decision of Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denying unemployment insurance benefits. Following a hearing, the Referee found that the claimant falsely certified to total unemployment from March 22, to May 31, 1964, during which period he was not totally unemployed. Upon these grounds, a forfeiture of 24 effective days was imposed as a penalty in the reduction of claimant’s future rights, and he was charged with an overpayment of $115 in benefits, ruled to be recoverable. The Referee’s findings were afiifmed by the board. The determination was a factual question supported by evidence. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur with Brink, J.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00172]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2015-4514; Airspace Docket No. 15-AEA-9]

Amendment of Class E Airspace for the Following New York Towns: 
Elmira, NY; Ithaca, NY; Poughkeepsie, NY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment, withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws a Final rule; technical amendment 
published in the Federal Register on November 30, 2015, amending Class 
E airspace at Elmira/Corning Regional Airport, Elmira, NY; Ithaca 
Tompkins Regional Airport, Ithaca, NY; and Duchess County Airport, 
Poughkeepsie, NY is being withdrawn. The FAA has determined that 
withdrawal of the final rule is warranted as additional analysis is 
needed.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC. As of January 13, 2016 the final rule; 
technical amendment published November 30, 2015, at 80 FR 74676, is 
withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-6364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History

    On November 30, 2015, the FAA published in the Federal Register a 
final rule, technical amendment to amend Class E airspace at Elmira/
Corning Regional Airport, Elmira, NY; Ithaca Tompkins Regional Airport, 
Ithaca, NY; and Duchess County Airport, Poughkeepsie, NY. (80 FR 
74676). Docket No. FAA-2015-4514. Subsequent to publication the FAA 
found errors in the airspace descriptions that now need further 
analysis. Therefore, the final rule is being withdrawn.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Withdrawal

    In consideration of the foregoing, the final rule technical 
amendment for FR Doc. FAA-2015-4514, Airspace Docket No. 15-AEA-9 as 
published in the Federal Register of November 30, 2015 (80 FR 74676) 
(FR Doc. 2015-30187), is hereby withdrawn.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on December 18, 2015.
Ryan W. Almasy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air 
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2016-00172 Filed 1-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
§ 3560.258 Terms of agreement. ( a ) *Term of agreement.* Rental assistance agreements will have a term of the later of 12 months from the first disbursement of the obligation or when funds under the agreement are exhausted.
( b ) *Replacing expiring obligations.* Rental assistance agreements may be renewed in accordance with § 3560.255(a)(1).
[87 FR 11283, Mar. 1, 2022]