alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 361 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2273 

To make available funds included in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 

for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 program 

for fiscal year 2006, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 9), 2006 

Ms. SNOWE (for herself, Mr. COLEMAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. 

GRASSLEY, Mr. SMITH, Mr. THUNE, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. 

SUNUNU, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. KERRY, Mr. 

MENENDEZ, and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; which was 

read the first time 

FEBRUARY 13, 2006 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To make available funds included in the Deficit Reduction 

Act of 2005 for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 program for fiscal year 2006, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 2273 PCS

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT 

2 OF 2005. 

3 Section 9001 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘for a 1-time only obliga7 tion and expenditure’’; 

8 (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘fiscal 

9 year 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2006’’; 

10 and 

11 (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fiscal 

12 year 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2006’’; 

13 and 

14 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘September 

15 30, 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2006’’. 

Calendar No. 361 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2273 

A BILL 

To make available funds included in the Deficit Recal year 2006, and for other purposes. Energy Assistance Act of 1981 program for fis- duction Act of 2005 for the Low-Income Home 

FEBRUARY 13, 2006 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSEPH FRANCIS MASTERSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-109

[November 4, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Mark T. Eissey, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

502019MM003970AXXX and 502019AP000180AXXX.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Logan T. Mohs, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NOS. 5:02cr8-RH/WCS

5:04cv41-RH/WCS

MICHAEL RAY ALFORD,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING §2255 MOTION

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 125) and the objections thereto (document 126). I

have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the opinion

of the court. The clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Defendant’s motion, as

amended, for relief under 28 U.S.C. §2255 (document 111) is DENIED WITH

PREJUDICE.” The clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED this 11th day of September, 2007.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 5:02-cr-00008-RH-CAS Document 127 Filed 09/11/07 Page 1 of 1
(May 27, 1980)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Howard W. Nicoleau, Appellant, v John B. Wilmot, as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Application for writ of habeas corpus dated April 10, 1980 denied. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Casey, JJ., concur.
#### § 372.1 Purpose.

These procedures implement section 102(2) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by assuring early and adequate consideration of environmental factors in Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service planning and decisionmaking and by promoting the effective, efficient integration of all relevant environmental requirements under the NEPA. The goal of timely, relevant environmental analysis will be secured principally by adhering to the NEPA implementing regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), especially provisions pertaining to timing (§ 1502.5), integration (§ 1502.25), and scope of analysis (§ 1508.25).

[60 FR 6002, Feb. 1, 1995, as amended at 83 FR 24009, May 24, 2018]
#### § 319.55-5 Notice of arrival by permittee.

Immediately upon the arrival of a shipment at the port of first arrival, the permittee or his agent shall submit a notice, in duplicate, to the Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs, through the United States Collector of Customs, or, in the case of Guam, through the Customs officer of the Government of Guam, on a form provided for that purpose, stating the number of the permit, the quantity in the shipment, the locality where grown, the date of arrival, and, if by rail, the name of the railroad company, the car numbers, and the terminal where the shipment is to be unloaded, or, if by vessel, the name of the vessel and the designation of the dock where the shipment is to be landed.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0049)

[24 FR 10788, Dec. 29, 1959, as amended at 48 FR 57466, Dec. 30, 1983]
Case 5:02-cv-00343-MP Document 11 Filed 01/07/03 Page 1 of 9
Case 5:02-cv-00343-MP Document 11 Filed 01/07/03 Page 2 of 9
Case 5:02-cv-00343-MP Document 11 Filed 01/07/03 Page 3 of 9
Case 5:02-cv-00343-MP Document 11 Filed 01/07/03 Page 4 of 9
Case 5:02-cv-00343-MP Document 11 Filed 01/07/03 Page 5 of 9
Case 5:02-cv-00343-MP Document 11 Filed 01/07/03 Page 6 of 9
Case 5:02-cv-00343-MP Document 11 Filed 01/07/03 Page 7 of 9
Case 5:02-cv-00343-MP Document 11 Filed 01/07/03 Page 8 of 9
Case 5:02-cv-00343-MP Document 11 Filed 01/07/03 Page 9 of 9
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2472 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Red 1:1 Dye. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2006 

Mr. DEWINE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Red 1:1 Dye. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BASIC RED 1:1 DYE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by striking subheading 9902.70.03 and inserting 

7 in numerical sequence the following new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.32.03 Basic Red 1:1 Dye (CAS 

No. 3068–39–1) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.13.60) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 2472 IS 

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification of ChiefExecutive Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2005 (the “Report”) of Federal Services Acquisition Corporation (the “Registrant”),as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,Joel R. Jacks, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, herebycertify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Date: December 23, 2005 |   | By:    | /s/    Joel  R. Jacks              |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |   | **Joel R.  Jacks**                                     |   |
|                    |   |   | **Chairman of  the Board and Chief Executive Officer** |   |

 

----
PUBLIC LAW 108–349—OCT. 21, 2004 118 STAT. 1389

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5122:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Sept. 28, considered and passed House.

Oct. 4, considered and passed Senate, amended.

Oct. 6, House concurred in Senate amendment.

Æ

Public Law 108–349

108th Congress

An Act

To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to permit members of

the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance to serve for 2 terms.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING SECOND TERM FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

OF OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The second sentence of section 301(e)(1) of

the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1381(e)(1))

is amended to read as follows: ‘‘A member of the Board may be

reappointed, but no individual may serve as a member for more

than 2 terms.’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a)

shall apply with respect to individuals serving on the Board of

Directors of the Office of Compliance on or after September 30,

2004.

Approved October 21, 2004.

2 USC 1381 note.

Oct. 21, 2004

[H.R. 5122]
---

Exhibit 32.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350                       
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
  Quarterly Report of Driftwood Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form
  10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in
  the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.

|Date: August 13, 2007                    | 
|---------------------------------------- | 
|                                         | 
|                                         | 
|/s/
      Keith Smith                    | 
|Keith Smith, Principal Financial Officer | 

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.130 Identified Rural Areas.

A RBIC must identify the specific Rural Area or Areas in which it intends to make Developmental Capital investments and provide Operational Assistance under the RBIC program. The scope of the identified areas must be consistent with Applicant's business plan, especially as the plan relates to the Applicant's ability to operate actively, soundly, and profitably in such areas.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Zoo Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Form
10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  June
4, 2010





/s/ Mark SeremetMark
      Seremet
                President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)





Date:  June
4, 2010





/s/ David FremedDavid
      FremedChief
      Financial Officer
                (Principal
      Financial Officer)
TABLE 2-4. OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION OPERATIONS AVERAGE EMISSION FACTORS (kg/hr/source)

Equipment Type Service a Emission Factor (kg/hr/source) b

Valves Gas Heavy Oil Light Oil Water/Oil 4.5E-03 8.4E-06 2.5E-03 9.8E-05
Pump seals Gas Heavy Oil Light Oil Water/Oil 2.4E-03
NA 1.3E-02 2.4E-05

Others c Gas Heavy Oil Light Oil Water/Oil 8.8E-03 3.2E-05 7.5E-03 1.4E-02

Connectors Gas Heavy Oil Light Oil Water/Oil 2.0E-04 7.5E-06 2.1E-04 1.1E-04
Flanges Gas Heavy Oil Light Oil Water/Oil 3.9E-04 3.9E-07 1.1E-04 2.9E-06
Open-ended lines Gas Heavy Oil Light Oil Water/Oil 2.0E-03 1.4E-04 1.4E-03 2.5E-04

a Water/Oil emission factors apply to water streams in oil service

with a water content greater than 50%, from the point of origin to the point where the water content reaches 99%. For water streams with a water content greater than 99%, the emission rate is considered negligible. bThese factors are for total organic compound emission rates

(including non-VOC’s such as methane and ethane) and apply to light crude, heavy crude, gas plant, gas production, and off shore facilities. "NA" indicates that not enough data were available to develop the indicated emission factor.

c The "other" equipment type was derived from compressors,

diaphrams, drains, dump arms, hatches, instruments, meters, pressure relief valves, polished rods, relief valves, and vents. This "other" equipment type should be applied for any equipment type other than connectors, flanges, open-ended lines, pumps, or valves.

2-15
Schneider Electric 1 

Manufacturer Stance – National Impact Analysis 

● Proposal – using EL2 

● Equipment Class 4 (DL7 and DL8) 

●Quads of savings 

– EL2 1.09 

– EL4 1.24 

●NPV 3% ($ billions) 

– EL2 7.51 

– EL4 8.00 

●NPV 7% ($ billions) 

– EL2 1.88 

– EL4 1.85 

●Manufacture expenses 

Double between EL2 and EL4 

● NEMA PREMIUM = TSL7 (EL3 & EL2) 

● Equipment Class 4 (DL7 and DL8) 

●Quads of savings 

– TSL7 1.10 

– TSL2 1.25 

●NPV 3% ($ billions) 

– TSL7 2.08 

– TSL2 8.45 

●NPV 7% ($ billions) 

– TSL7 2.05 

– TSL2 2.08 

●Manufacture expenses 

Double between TSL7 and TSL2 
Schneider Electric 2 

Change Manufacturer Stance to below 

(with scaling factor modified for 15, 750, and 1000kVA) 
Schneider Electric 3 

Manufacturer Data 

●DL7 @ EL3 or TSL7 

● LCC savings: 1630 mean and 1567 median (EL4: 1695/1630) 

● 97.6% of consumers would see benefit (EL4: 97.3%) 

● Allows manufactures to build with multiple materials but also strive for 

lowest cost solution which would lead to EL4 units being offered into market 

based on modeling data 

●DL8 @ EL2 or TSL7 

● LCC savings: 2448 mean and 2297 median (EL4: 2632/2400) 

● 94.54% of consumers would see benefit (EL4: 84.59%) 
Schneider Electric 4 

Modeling Data for Lowest Cost 

(using the exclusion scenario) 

● dEL 3 

● Still allows M6 for 

smaller manufactures 

● M4 and M3 cost very 

similar giving larger 

manufacturers options 

for material 

● M4 and M3 allow 

manufacturers to offer 

dEL 4 and dEL 5 to 

market for early adopters 
Schneider Electric 5 

Modeling Data for Lowest Cost 

(using the exclusion scenario) 

● dEL 2 

● Still allows M6 for 

smaller manufacturers 

● M5, and M3 cost very 

similar giving larger 

manufacturers options 

for material 

(M4 also an option) 

● M3 allow manufacturers 

to offer dEL 4 to market 

for early adopters 
Schneider Electric 6 

Modeling Data for Lowest Cost 

● Comments 

● New materials and process are low cost solutions for DL7 and DL8 

●Manufacturer have ability to use the H0 and SA1 material and if 

model is correct – will migrate towards since shows as lowest cost 

products at dEL2/3 and dEL3
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2010-0853

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM116AD

737-27-1289 IN 01 --- 5/17/10

737-27-1289 IN 02 --- 9/27/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29580]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act--Public Hearing November 24, 2010

    OPIC's Sunshine Act notice of its Public Hearing in Conjunction 
with each Board meeting was published in the Federal Register (Volume 
75, Number 210, Page 67145) on November 1, 2010. No requests were 
received to provide testimony or submit written statements for the 
record; therefore, OPIC's public hearing scheduled for 2 PM, November 
24, 2010 in conjunction with OPIC's December 9, 2010 Board of Directors 
meeting has been cancelled.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Information on the hearing cancellation 
may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, via facsimile 
at (202) 218-0136, or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b28040505020e452f041c05182b041b0208450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d6e42434344480369425a435e6d425d444e034a425b">[email protected]</span></a>.

     November 19, 2010.
Connie M. Downs,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29580 Filed 11-19-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 201.56-4 Cucurbit family, (Cucurbitaceae). Kinds of seed: Citron, cucumber, West India gherkin, melon, pumpkin, squash, and watermelon. ( a ) General description. ( 1 ) Germination habit: Epigeal dicot.
( 2 ) Food reserves: Cotyledons which are large and fleshy; they expand, become photosynthetic, and usually persist beyond the seedling stage.
( 3 ) Shoot system: The hypocotyl elongates and the cotyledons are pulled free of the seed coat, which often adheres to a peg-like appendage at the base of the hypocotyl. The epicotyl usually does not show any development within the test period.
( 4 ) Root system: A long primary root with numerous secondary roots.
( b ) Abnormal seedling description. ( 1 ) Cotyledons: ( i ) Less than half of the original cotyledon tissue remaining attached.
( ii ) Less than half of the original cotyledon tissue free of necrosis or decay. (Remove any attached seed coats at the end of the test period for evaluation of cotyledons.)
( 2 ) Epicotyl: ( i ) Missing. (May be assumed to be present if the cotyledons are intact.)
( ii ) [Reserved]
( 3 ) Hypocotyl: ( i ) Deep open cracks extending into the conducting tissue.
( ii ) Malformed, such as markedly shortened, curled, or thickened.
( 4 ) Root: ( i ) None.
( ii ) Weak, stubby, or missing primary root, with less than two strong secondary or adventitious roots.
( 5 ) Seedling: ( i ) One or more essential structures impaired as a result of decay from primary infection.
( ii ) Albino.
[59 FR 64501, Dec. 14, 1994]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Oliva, Appellant.

— Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, ren*545dered May 23, 1979, affirmed (see *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230). Damiani, J. P., Gibbons, Rabin and Margett, JJ., concur.
§ 3201.135 Heating fuels and wick lamps. ( a ) *Definition.* Heating fuels and wick lamps are products that create controlled sources of heat or sustain controlled open flames that are used for warming food, portable stoves, beverage urns, or fondue pots. This category also includes wick lamps and their fuels that create controlled sources of light indoors and in camping or emergency preparedness situations. This category excludes fire logs and fire starters and candles and wax melts.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 75 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased heating fuels and wick lamps. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased heating fuels and wick lamps.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 18 

, 2019

Order 

Clerk

March 18, 2019

159139(56)

ANNE M. WINTHROP,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 159139

v COA: 338773

Oakland CC: 2016-151187-CK

LAURA HINES DECK,

Defendant-Appellee

________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee to extend the time 

for filing her answer is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if 

submitted on or before April 16, 2019.