alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2329 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain filament yarns. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2006 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

filament yarns. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FILAMENT YARNS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.91 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain filament yarns) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2329 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### Andrew Jesacher, defendant in error, v. Abraham B. Lewis et al., plaintiffs in error.

Gen. No. 37,574.

Opinion filed November 5, 1934.

Tage Joranson, for plaintiffs in error. Arthur J. Hughes, for de- • fendant in error; Frank Michels, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                      10,874
<SECURITIES>                                 2,308
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (801)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,909
<PP&E>                                      17,836
<DEPRECIATION>                            (12,587)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,096
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,905
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                        88
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,096
<SALES>                                     11,049
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,405
<CGS>                                        2,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,728
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,458
<INCOME-TAX>                                   365
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,093
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,093
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.11


</TABLE>
§ 3550.104 Applications. ( a ) *Application submissions.* All persons applying for section 504 loans or grants must file a complete written application in a format specified by RHS. Applications will be accepted even when funds are not available.
( b ) *Application processing.* ( 1 ) Incomplete applications will be returned to the applicant specifying in writing the additional information that is needed to make the application complete.
( 2 ) An applicant may voluntarily withdraw an application at any time.
( 3 ) RHS may periodically request in writing that applicants reconfirm their interest in obtaining a loan or grant. RHS may withdraw the application of any applicant who does not respond within the specified timeframe.
( 4 ) Applicants who are eligible will be notified in writing. If additional information becomes available that indicates that the original eligibility determination may have been in error or that circumstances have changed, RHS may reconsider the application and the applicant may be required to submit additional information.
( 5 ) Applicants who are ineligible will be notified in writing and provided with the specific reasons for the rejection.
( c ) *Processing priorities.* When funding is not sufficient to serve all eligible applicants, applications for assistance to remove health and safety hazards will receive priority for funding. In the case of applications with equivalent priority status that are received on the same day, preference will be extended to applicants qualifying for a veterans' preference. After selection for processing, requests for assistance are funded on a first-come, first-served basis.
[61 FR 59779, Nov. 22, 1996, as amended at 87 FR 6772, Feb. 7, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Physics; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Stony Brook FY11 Site Visit (1208).
    Date and Time: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 1 p.m.-5:20 p.m. 
Wednesday, December 1, 2010, 8:30 a.m.-4:15 p.m.
    Place: Stony Brook--Long Island Campus.
    Type of Meeting: Partially Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Marvin Goldberg, Program Director for 
Elementary Particle Physics, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7392.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide an evaluation concerning the 
proposal submitted to the National Science Foundation.

Agenda

Tuesday, Nov. 30

1 p.m. Executive session (Closed)
1:15 p.m. Group Overview (JH)
1:30 p.m. Atlas Overview (JH)
2 p.m. D0 Overview (PG)
2:30 p.m. Outreach (RM)
3:10 p.m. Break
3:20 p.m. Tour
4 p.m. Grannis research
4:40 p.m. Tsybychev research
5:20 p.m. Executive session (Closed)

Wednesday, Dec. 1

8:30 a.m. Executive session (Closed)
9:15 a.m. Rijssenbeek research (video)
9:55 a.m. Schamberger research
10:35 a.m. Break
10:50 a.m. Engelmann research
11:30 a.m. Hobbs research
12:10 p.m. Lunch
1:15 p.m. McCarthy research
2 p.m. Budget and Panel-PI discussion
3 p.m. Break
3:15 p.m. Executive session (Closed)
    Reason for Closing: The proposal contains proprietary or 
confidential material including technical information; financial 
data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning 
individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt 
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine 
Act.

    Dated: November 16, 2010.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-29213 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
# 3.101-2 Solicitation and acceptance of gratuities by Government personnel.

As a rule, no Government employee *may* solicit or accept, directly or indirectly, any gratuity, gift, favor, entertainment, loan, or anything of monetary value from anyone who (a) has or is seeking to obtain Government business with the employee’s agency, (b) conducts activities that are regulated by the employee’s agency, or (c) has interests that *may* be substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the employee’s official duties. Certain limited exceptions are authorized in agency regulations.

**Parent topic:**3.101 Standards of conduct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000755113
<NAME>                        SurgiCare, Inc
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                        91
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 3527
<ALLOWANCES>                  1546
<INVENTORY>                   90
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              2202
<PP&E>                        1184
<DEPRECIATION>                527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                3022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1785
<BONDS>                       33
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   1
<COMMON>                      63
<OTHER-SE>                    1139
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  3022
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1229
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              252
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            15
<INCOME-PRETAX>               629
<INCOME-TAX>                  210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           419
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  419
<EPS-BASIC>                   .030
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .020



</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNASA/DOD Aerospace Knowledge Diffusion Research Project. Paper 9: Information intermediaries and the transfer of aerospace Scientific and Technical Information (STI): A report from the fieldFrom the NASA/DOD survey data, there can be no way of inferring what strategy for knowledge transfer is best; indeed, given the fact that the respondents were all presumably well qualified professionals, the data tend to call into serious question the idea that any one model might meet the needs of more than a distinct minority of possible users. The evidence to date appears to reinforce the concept that different information environments take many different shapes, and interact with each other and with formal data transmission sources in many different and equally valuable ways. Any overall strategy for improving the effectiveness and efficiency of scientific and technical information sharing must take this divergence into account, and work toward the creation of systems that reinforce true interactive knowledge utilization rather than simply disseminating data.Document ID19910012646Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsEveland, J. D.*(Claremont Graduate School CA., United States)*Pinelli, Thomas E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryDocumentation And Information ScienceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:103384AD-A252561NASA-TM-103384Meeting InformationMeeting: 1991 NASA STI Annual ConferenceLocation: Huntsville, ALCountry: United StatesStart Date: April 9, 1991Accession Number91N21959Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910012646.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Anne B. Hamilton, Respondent, v. William Dudley et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously reversed and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: The inordinate delay in the prosecution of this action requires the granting of the motion to dismiss. A mere recitation of the time table impels us to this determination. The accident occurred on October 31, 1959 and summons were served on December 13, 1959. Defendants promptly served notice of retainer and demand for the complaint. Nothing was done by plaintiff and defendants moved to dismiss on April 18, 1961. Plaintiff then served her complaint on April 21, 1961, as a result of which the motion was marked *“*off ”. On May 11, 1961 an answer and demand for a bill of particulars were served. Plaintiff did not furnish the bill of particulars and nearly six months later defendants moved for and were granted an order of preclusion on November 6, 1961, but pursuant to permission given by Special Term plaintiff served the bill on that day. No further effort was made by the plaintiff to bring the ease to trial until four years later when on November 26, 1965 (six years after the accident) plaintiff, through a different attorney, served a note of issue. No notice of change of attorneys, as required by CPLR 321, subd. [b], was served upon defendants’ atl orneys. Defendants then made their motion to dismiss *“*by reason of plaintiff’s unreasonable neglect and failure to prosecute ” and it is from the denial of this motion that defendants appeal. No 45 days demand was served by defendants. Under the facts of gross delay present here, a note of issue having been filed by plaintiff, the demand was not necessary *(Commercial Credit Corp.*v. *Lafayette,*17 N Y 2d 367, 370). Special Term stated that defendants’ failure to submit proof of prejudice by the delay was a serious omission. Although prejudice may be one of the factors for consideration under certain circumstances, we do not find it a necessary element in this case. For several years we have condemned tardiness and made it clear that one asking for excuse for great delay in prosecution comes with a heavy burden of explanation *(Goldstein*v. *Wickett,*3 A D 2d 135; *Walker*v. *Ferri,*5 A D 2d 24; *Nicotera*v. *Aliasso,*22 A D 2d 758; *Gino*v. *Syracuse Mem. Hosp.,*23 A D 2d 964). *702The record discloses inexcusable neglect upon the part of plaintiff’s first attorney which cannot be cured by substitution of attorneys. The denial of defendants’ motion after such a lapse of time was an improvident exercise of Special Term’s discretion. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oswego County denying motion to dismiss complaint for failure to prosecute.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecehio and Marsh, JJ.
§ 3431.16 Certifications and verifications. ( a ) The application for the loan repayment program shall include a personal statement describing how the applicant would meet the requirements of: ( 1 ) The veterinary service shortage situations as defined in the RFA;
( 2 ) The eligibility criteria for application of section § 3431.9 of this part; and
( 3 ) The selection priority of § 3431.14 of this part.
( b ) The applicant shall provide sufficient documentation to establish that the applicant has qualifying loans as described in § 3431.15 of this part.
( c ) The applicant shall provide sufficient documentation to establish that the applicant has the capacity to secure an offer of employment or establish and/or maintain a veterinary practice in a veterinary service shortage situation as defined in subpart A of this part.
( d ) The applicant shall provide, if applicable, sufficient documentation to establish that the applicant is licensed to practice veterinary medicine in the jurisdiction in which the applicant has an offer of employment.
( e ) The applicant shall provide, if applicable, the required documentation to establish whether the applicant receives payments under any other Federal, State, institutional, or private loan repayment programs.
( f ) The applicant shall provide the required documentation to show that he/she has completed, or is in the process of completing, the National Veterinary Accreditation Program (NVAP) if national accreditation is required for the veterinary shortage position for which the applicant has an offer of employment.
( g ) The applicant shall provide authorization to the appropriate staff as designated by the Secretary to obtain a copy of the participant's credit report.
#### § 4279.114 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000             OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000             APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                          11,832                  11,832
<SECURITIES>                                     3,516                   3,516
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,986                  12,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (801)                   (801)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,513                   3,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,211                  31,211
<PP&E>                                          18,384                  18,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,351)                (13,351)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,540                  37,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,039                  19,039
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            88                      88
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,413                  18,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,540                  37,540
<SALES>                                         12,403                  23,452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,799                  32,204
<CGS>                                            2,456                   5,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,671                   7,399
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,043                  21,354
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,184                   3,642
<INCOME-TAX>                                       540                     905
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,644                   2,737
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,644                   2,737
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.19                   $0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.17                   $0.28


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightwave Logic, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew J. Ashton, Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company

.

|                         |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Date:  November 15, 2010 |  | /s/Andrew J. Ashton          
|                         |  | Andrew J. Ashton             
|                         |  | Treasurer                    
|                         |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
Subject: ANNOUNCEMENT OF AVAILABILITY:

AIRPORT SURFACE SAFETY TRAINING 

PROGRAMS FOR MECHANICS AND RAMP 

PERSONNEL

Date: 9/23/03 

Initiated By: AFS-305 

AC No: 150/5210-21

Change:

1. PURPOSE. This Advisory Circular (AC) announces the availability of two training 

programs on aircraft taxi procedures and tug and tow procedures, and also provides information 

about how to acquire these programs. 

2. BACKGROUND. Preventing runway incursions is one of the top safety goals of the Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA). In support of this goal, the Office of Runway Safety, ARI-1, 

and the Flight Standards Service Aircraft Maintenance Division, AFS-300, have produced two 

interactive CD-ROMs (listed below). These CD programs inform mechanics and ramp 

personnel about important practices for preventing runway incursions, ramp safety practices, 

proper taxi procedures, and proper tug and tow procedures. 

a. Taxi 101. This training program covers: weather; airport familiarization; runway and 

taxiway signs, surface markings, and lighting; aircraft preflight; flight deck procedures; and air 

traffic control procedures. 

b. Tug & Tow 101. This training program covers: personal safety; ramp operations and 

safety; aircraft and engine hazards; communications; push back; aircraft towing; airport signs, 

surface markings, and weather; and air traffic control procedures. 

3. HOW TO ORDER. These CD-ROMs may be obtained free of charge from the FAA by 

visiting the Office of Runway Safety Web site at http://www.faa.gov/runwaysafety and clicking 

on the ordering instructions link. They may also be obtained by writing to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Runway Safety 

ATTN.: AVR/AFS Representative 

490 L’Enfant Plaza, Suite 7225 

Washington, DC 20024 

/s/ John M. Allen for 

James J. Ballough 

Director, Flight Standards Service
```

[Federal Register: September 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 182)]
[Notices]               
[Page 57457]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21se10-41]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, October 1, 2010.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-23645 Filed 9-17-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:94cr3012LAC

LEONARD BRADSHAW

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on September 20 , 2006

Motion/Pleadings: RESPONSE TO THE ORDER DENYING HIS REQUEST FOR A NUNC

PRO TUNC REVIEW PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) 

Filed byDEFENDANT PRO SE on 9/7/2006 Doc.# 738

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 26th day of

September, 2006, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:94-cr-03012-LC-MD Document 739 Filed 09/26/06 Page 1 of 1