alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:93cr4028-WS

KARIM SHAREEF MATEEN, f/k/a

REGINALD MARCEL DENNIS,

Defendant.

 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 844)

docketed May 16, 2005. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

motion for reduction in sentence be summarily denied. The defendant has filed no

objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 844) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

Case 4:93-cr-04028-WS-WCS Document 847 Filed 06/22/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:93cr4028-WS

2. The defendant’s motion for reduction in sentence (doc. 842) is hereby

summarily DENIED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this June 22, 2005.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:93-cr-04028-WS-WCS Document 847 Filed 06/22/05 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:02-cr-00039-MP   Document 91   Filed 04/03/08   Page 1 of 1
§ 4284.1109 Ineligible applicants. Applicants will be ineligible to receive funds under this subpart as discussed in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. ( a ) If the applicant has an outstanding judgment obtained by the U.S. in a Federal Court (other than in the United States Tax Court), is delinquent in the payment of Federal income taxes, or is delinquent on a Federal debt, the applicant is not eligible to receive a grant until the judgment is paid in full or otherwise satisfied or the delinquency is resolved. The Agency will check the Do Not Pay System to verify this information.
( b ) If the applicant is debarred or suspended from receiving Federal assistance, the applicant is not eligible to receive a grant under this subpart. The Agency will check the System for Award Management (SAM) to determine if the applicant has been debarred or suspended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
sheet at December 31, 1995 (Audited) and the Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended December 31, 1995 (Audited) and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         126,941
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  239,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               366,709
<PP&E>                                       8,552,301
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,670,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,249,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              535
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,248,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,249,010
<SALES>                                      1,024,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,030,181
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               420,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                610,015
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            610,015
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   610,015
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    27.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    27.45
        

</TABLE>
Summary of Changes to Compensation of Non-employee Directors



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Summary of Changes to Compensation of Non-employee Directors 
 The compensation arrangements for our non-employee directors
(“Outside Directors”) were described on Exhibit 10.13 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We have made certain changes to these arrangements, as described below. 
 The fee to an Outside Director for attending each quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors that the Outside Director attends in person was increased
to $18,000. An Outside Director may be paid such fee for attending a quarterly Board meeting via telephonic conference call if the Outside Director has good reason for the Outside Director’s failure to attend such meeting in person as
determined by the Chairman of the Board, but such payment is limited to one occurrence in any given fiscal year. The fee to an Outside Director who is a member of the Audit Committee for attending each quarterly meeting of such committee that
the Outside Director attends in person was increased to $7,200. In addition, the fee which is paid quarterly to each Outside Director who is a member of the Compensation Committee was increased to $3,600, provided that, in order to be eligible
to receive the fee with respect to a fiscal quarter, the Outside Director must have served on the Compensation Committee on the last day of such fiscal quarter. The foregoing changes were effective April 1, 2009. 
 All other elements of the compensation arrangements for our Outside Directors, as described on Exhibit 10.13 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, remain in effect.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 1/2/97

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

PABLO LUIS GOMEZ ANGARRA,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6167

(D.C. No. CIV-95-441-A)

(W.D. Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, LOGAN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
1

 Defendant received some sentencing relief pursuant to his first 28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion. I R. doc. 47. We affirmed the denial of a second § 2255 motion. United States

v. Gomez, No. 96-6225 (10th Cir. filed March 1, 1996).

- 2 -

Defendant Pablo Louis Gomez Angarra appeals the denial of his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction in sentence. In this third effort to obtain a lower

sentence,1 defendant seeks the benefit of the “safety valve” provision of USSG

§ 5C1.2(1)-(5) providing for sentences below the mandatory statutory minimum in certain

circumstances. Defendant is now serving the mandatory minimum term but raises various

arguments why he qualifies for further relief. The government erroneously conceded that

§ 5C1.2, which became effective approximately two years after defendant’s original

sentencing, may be applied retroactively. The district court did not discuss retroactivity,

but concluded that defendant did not meet the § 5C1.2(5) criteria of truthful disclosure.

A defendant may seek modification of a term of imprisonment when the Sentencing Commission later lowers the applicable sentencing range. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). A

reduction in sentence, however, must be “consistent with applicable policy statements

issued by the Sentencing Commission.” Id. § 3582(c)(2). The policy statement at

§ 1B1.10(c) does not include Amendment 509, which added § 5C1.2, among the amendments to be applied retroactively. Therefore, we have held that § 5C1.2 may not be

applied retroactively to a sentence entered before its effective date. United States v.

Torres, 99 F.3d 360, 362-63 (10th Cir. 1996). Torres controls the determination of this

appeal.
- 3 -

AFFIRMED.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

James K. Logan

Circuit Judge
From: <twlohner@aep.com>

To: Thomas.Finseth@erg.com

CC: Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov

Date: 3/13/2012 10:03 AM

Subject: Re: MT ABMet System

System start up date: Nov. 11, 2011 

Steady-state achieved: Feb. 11, 2012

"Thomas Finseth" <Thomas.Finseth@erg.com> 

03/12/2012 08:12 AM

To

<twlohner@aep.com>

cc

<Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov>

Subject

Re: MT ABMet System

Tim,

Thanks for the response and providing the NPDES permit. I have a couple 

of follow-up questions regarding the system and your response.

1) For the ABMet start up date that you provided, November 10, 2011, was 

that the actual start up date (i.e., system started operation on that 

day), or was it the projected start up date (i.e., based on the project 

schedule it was supposed to start operation that day). If the latter, 

please provide the actual start up date.

2) Please provide the date that the system reached steady-state operation.

Thanks again for your time.

TJ

>>> <twlohner@aep.com> 3/9/2012 2:21 PM >>>

TJ, the project schedule for the ABMet System shows that construction was 

substantially complete, and the facility went on-line, on November 10, 

2011. Attached is a copy of the Mountaineer Plant NPDES permit and its 

modification. 

Let me know if you need anything else. 

Tim
Message Information 

Date 08/27/2012 02:34 PM 

From pubIicaccess@supportportaI.com

To LisaP Jackson/DC/USEPAIUS@EPA 

cc 

Subject Ticket #23002-358897 Response Sent 

Message Body 

Message to: Shari Clayman 

Thank you for your inquiry to the EPA Web site. Your request has been received by the Headquarters 

Public Access Service, a contractor operated reference and referral service. 

Thank you for your email. We are forwarding your comments to the Office of the Administrator for 

response. You can also find contact information for the office at:http://www.epa.qov/aboutepa/ao.html.

*********************** 

Public Access Reference Service, operated by ASRC Primus 

EPA Headquarters 

Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. (3404T) 

Washington, DC 20460 

Fax: (202) 566-0574 

The following Customers have been CC'ed: 

The following CSR(s) have been CC'ed: jackson.lisapepa.gov

Ticket Summary: 

Ticket #: 23002-358897 

Date Created: 8/16/2012 05:25 PM EDT 

Customer: N/A N/A (tihickey iowatelecom .net) 

Summary: ethanol 

Question: Due to the poor corn crop this year, please suspend the ethanol mandate. 

Topic: Other 

To access the Ticket: 

Go to: https://dl 1 .parature.com/Iink/desk/23002/2301 2/Ticket/358897 

Powered by Parature
OEX Processing Information 

Processed Date:	08/27/2012 02:57 PM 

Processed By	Jacqueline Leavy 

P0 Office	 Category: 

OEX	 CMS 

Message Count	

1
# - Devany, Dennis (OST) From: Don Craig [dcraig@westelcom.com] "**"'Sent'~l** .'-"" :; Satuxday, February 13, 2010 3:30 PM 

### ";' ?::**:;To:£"~:** . . Devany, Dennis (OST)**~ubject:** Keep Cape Air as EAS provider



# ..
..

### _.~**~~,P~V~IlY,** As a resident of Clinton County, NY, and afrequent flyer, I urge you to continue to approve Cape Air as the Essential Air Service provider at Plattsburgh International Airport (PSG). Cape Air has proven itself reliable and has been accepted by our community. They provide regular and frequent service at affordable prices. . The bigger planes, higher rates and less frequent service proposed by Colgan are not an improvement. Colgan also has aquestionable safety record due to cutting corners. Cape Air is mychoice for service andcontinued economic developmentthrough Plattsburgh International Airport. Thank you foryour consideration. . Respectfully Don Craig Saranac, NY

1
Exhibit
        32.1
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Each
        of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Sino
        Gas
        International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1)
         The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period
        ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
 
 Date:
        November 14, 2008
 
 /s/
                  Yuchuan LiuYuchuan
                  LiuChief
                  Executive Officer/s/
                  Yugang ZhangYugang
                  ZhangChief
                  Financial Officer
§ 42.103 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart outlines the procedure to be used to establish the condition of containers in stationary lots of packaged foods. This subpart shall be used to determine the acceptability of a lot based on specified acceptable quality levels and defects referenced in § 42.104 or any alternative plan which is approved by the Administrator. In addition, any other sampling plan in the tables with a larger first sample size than that indicated by the lot size range may be specified when approved by the Administrator. This subpart or approved alternative plan will be applied when a Government agency or private user of the inspection or grading services requests that filled primary containers or shipping cases, or both, be certified for condition. Unless the request for certification specifically asks that only the primary container or only the shipping case be examined, both containers will be examined.
( b ) Unless otherwise specified by the user of service, this subpart will not apply to inspection lots of less than 50 shipping cases or to inspection lots of less than 300 primary containers. When the primary container is the shipping case, the shipping case limit will apply. When the lot size exceeds either the 50 shipping case limit or the 300 primary container limit or both, the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section will apply.
( c ) Under certain conditions, special procedures (Skip Lot Sampling and Inspection) may be used to determine the condition of containers in stationary lots of packaged foods. Subpart C sets forth the requirements and procedures for Skip Lot Sampling and Inspection.
[31 FR 4687, Mar. 19, 1966, as amended at 36 FR 18456, Sept. 15, 1971; 41 FR 42639, Sept. 28, 1976. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further amended at 45 FR 69424, Oct. 21, 1980. Redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981]
#### In the Matter of Verna N. Seward, Respondent, v Donald Seward, Appellant.

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated December 18, 1978, which granted the petitioner wife support and counsel fees. Order affirmed, with costs. Petitioner commenced this proceeding for support pursuant to section 412 of the Family Court Act. Prior to this proceeding, the estranged parties had entered into a separation agreement which provides for child support but makes no provision for support of the petitioner. Significantly, the agreement expressly states that the husband understands that the wife is not prohibited from asserting a future claim for her support. After conducting a hearing, the Family Court concluded that petitioner was now entitled to support because of her present inability to work due to the disabling effects of an accident. The court also awarded counsel fees. The order should be affirmed. The husband’s constitutional challenge to section 412 of the Family Court Act is entirely without merit in view of our recent decision in *Lebensfeld v Lebensfeld*(72 AD2d 790), in which the statute was construed to be gender neutral thereby complying with the requirements of *Orr v Orr*(440 US 268; see, also, *Childs v Childs,*69 AD2d 406). We similarly construe section 438 of the Family Court Act, which provides for the award of counsel fees *(Childs v Childs, supra).*Based upon the relative circumstances of the parties as fully developed in the record, the award of support and counsel fees was entirely proper. Rabin, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Case 4:02-cv-00363-SPM Document 67 Filed 08/04/03 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:02-cv-00363-SPM Document 67 Filed 08/04/03 Page 2 of 2
#### § 4279.203 Exception authority.

The Administrator may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture, make an exception, on a case-by-case basis, to any requirement or provision of this subpart that is not inconsistent with any authorizing statute or applicable law, if the Administrator determines that application of the requirement or provision would adversely affect the Federal government's interest.
#### § 3560.463 Obstruction of Federal audits.

The Agency will act in accordance with U.S. Code Title 18, part I, chapter 73, section 1516(a).
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM

PART I. TRANSCRIPT ORDER INFORMATION

Appellant to complete and file with the District Court Clerk within 10 days of the filing of the notice of appeal in all cases, including 

those in which there was no hearing or for which no transcript is ordered.

Short Case Style: vs

District Court No.: Date Notice of Appeal Filed: Court of Appeals No.:

(If Available)

CHOOSE ONE: No hearing No transcript is required for appeal purposes All necessary transcript(s) on file

I AM ORDERING A TRANSCRIPT OF THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS:

Check appropriate box(es) and provide all information requested:

 HEARING DATE(S) JUDGE/MAGISTRATE COURT REPORTER NAME(S) 

 Pre-Trial Proceedings

 Trial

 Sentence

 Other

METHOD OF PAYMENT:

I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONTACTED THE COURT REPORTER(S) AND HAVE MADE SATISFACTORY

 ARRANGEMENTS WITH THE COURT REPORTER(S) FOR PAYING THE COST OF THE TRANSCRIPT.

CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT. Attached for submission to District Judge/Magistrate is my completed CJA Form 24 requesting authorization

for government payment of transcript. [A transcript of the following proceedings will be provided ONLY IF SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED

in Item 13 on CJA Form 24: Voir Dire; Opening and Closing Statements of Prosecution and Defense; Prosecution Rebuttal; Jury Instructions.]

Ordering Counsel/Party:

Name of Firm:

Street Address/P.O. Box:

City/State/Zip Code: Phone No. :

I certify that I have completed and filed PART I with the District Court Clerk, sent a copy to the appropriate Court Reporter(s) if ordering a

transcript, mailed a filed copy to the Court of Appeals Clerk, and served all parties.

DATE: SIGNED: Attorney for:

PART II. COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Court Reporter to complete and file with the District Court Clerk within 10 days of receipt. The Court Reporter shall send

a copy to the Court of Appeals Clerk and to all parties.

Date Transcript Order received:

 Satisfactory arrangements for paying the cost of the transcript were completed on: 

 Satisfactory arrangements for paying the cost of the transcript have not been made.

No. of hearing days: Estimated no. of transcript pages: Estimated filing date:

DATE: SIGNED: Phone No. :

NOTE: The transcript is due to be filed within 30 days of the date satisfactory arrangements for paying the cost of the

transcript were completed unless the Court Reporter obtains an extension of time to file the transcript.

PART III. NOTIFICATION THAT TRANSCRIPT HAS BEEN FILED IN DISTRICT COURT

Court Reporter to complete and file with the District Court Clerk on date of filing transcript in District Court. The Court

Reporter shall send a copy to the Court of Appeals Clerk on the same date.

This is to certify that the transcript has been completed and filed with the district court on (date):

Actual No. of Volumes and Hearing Dates:

Date: Signature of Court Reporter:

Rev. 2/06

USCA11 Case: 22-11607 Date Filed: 05/24/2022 Page: 1 of 1

Case 7:20-cv-00153-MCR-GRJ Document 193 Filed 05/26/22 Page 1 of 1
Notice 609

(Rev. October 2013)

Privacy Act Notice

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Cat. No. 45963A

Notice 609 (10-2013)

The Privacy Act of 1974 says that when we ask 

you for information about yourself, we must rst 

tell you our legal right to ask for the information, 

why we are asking for it, and how it will be used. 

We must also tell you what could happen if you do 

not provide it and whether or not you must 

respond under the law. 

This notice applies to tax returns and any 

papers led with them. It also applies to any 

questions we need to ask you so we can 

complete, correct, or process your return; gure 

your tax; and collect tax, interest, or penalties. We 

ask for information to carry out the U.S. tax laws. 

We need the information to gure and collect the 

right amount of tax. 

Our legal right to ask for information is found in 

Internal Revenue Code sections 6001, 6011, and 

6012 and their regulations. They say that you must 

le a return or statement with us for any tax you 

are liable for. Your response is mandatory under 

these sections. Sections 7601–7613 authorize us 

to examine books and records and ask questions 

to obtain information we need. Section 6109 and 

its regulations say that you must provide your 

identication number on what you le. Paid tax 

return preparers and electronic return originators 

are also required to provide their identifying 

numbers.

We may give the information to the Department 

of Justice to enforce the federal civil and criminal 

tax laws, and to other federal agencies as 

provided by law. We may also give it to cities, 

states, the District of Columbia, and to U.S. 

commonwealths or possessions to carry out their 

tax laws. We may give it to certain foreign 

governments under tax treaties they have with the 

United States. We may also disclose this 
information to federal and state agencies to 

enforce federal nontax criminal laws, or to federal 

law enforcement and intelligence agencies to 

combat terrorism. 

If you do not le a return, the law says that you 

may be subject to penalties and interest, and in 

certain cases, criminal prosecution. If you do not 

provide required information, or provide false or 

fraudulent information, the law says that we may 

have to disallow the exemptions, exclusions, 

credits, deductions, or adjustments shown on your 

return. This could make your tax higher or delay 

any refund. You may also be subject to additional 

interest, penalties, or criminal prosecution. 

Please keep this notice with your records. You 

may want to refer to it if we ask you for other 

information. If you have questions about the rules 

for ling and giving information, please visit our 

website at IRS.gov, or call or visit any Internal 

Revenue Service ofce.
#### § 3560.568 Supplemental requirements for seasonal off-farm labor housing.

For off-farm labor housing operating on a seasonal basis, the management plan must establish specific opening and closing dates. During the off-season, off-farm labor housing may be used as defined in subpart A of this part under short-term lease provisions. Where rents are charged on a per-unit basis and family income qualifies the household for rental assistance, rental assistance may be used.