alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
13.403 Preparation and execution of orders.

Priced or unpriced contracts, purchase orders, or BPAs using the fast payment procedure shall

include the following:

(a) A requirement that the supplies be shipped transportation or postage prepaid.

(b) A requirement that invoices be submitted directly to the finance or other office designated in the

order, or in the case of unpriced purchase orders, to the contracting officer (see 13.302-2(c)).

(c) The following statement on the consignee’s copy:

Consignee’s Notification to Purchasing Activity of Nonreceipt, Damage, or Nonconformance

The consignee shall notify the purchasing office promptly after the specified date of delivery of

supplies not received, damaged in transit, or not conforming to specifications of the purchase order.

Unless extenuating circumstances exist, the notification should be made not later than 60 days after

the specified date of delivery.

Parent topic: Subpart 13.4 - Fast Payment Procedure
#### Alice Louise Kinney, appellee, v. City of Chicago et al., defendants. City of Chicago, appellant.

Gen. No. 37,398.

*626Opinion filed November 27, 1934.

William H. Sexton, Corporation Counsel, and Alexander M. Srnietanka, City Attorney, for appellant; Robert E. Dowling, Assistant City Attorney, of counsel. Charles C. Spencer and F. W. Jaros, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Seanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.
EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the annual Report of TDI Holding  Corp.  (the  "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Blair Zykan, CEO
and Chief Financial Officer of the company,  certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sction 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Blair Zykan
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Blair Zykan, CEO & CFO

Dated:  7/27/04
EXHIBIT
32.1





SARBANES-OXLEY
SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION





CERTIFICATION
OF DR. RALPH S. CUNNINGHAM, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


OF
EPE HOLDINGS, LLC, THE GENERAL PARTNER OF


ENTERPRISE GP
HOLDINGS L.P.





In
connection with this quarterly report of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dr. Ralph S. Cunningham, Chief Executive Officer of EPE Holdings,
LLC, the general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








/s/ Dr. Ralph S.
Cunningham


Name:   Dr.
Ralph S. Cunningham


Title:     Chief
Executive Officer of EPE Holdings, LLC


on
behalf of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.





Date:      May
12, 2008
EXHIBIT 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Quipp, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333−75085) on Form S−8 of Quipp, Inc. and subsidiary (the Company) of our report dated March 31, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive (loss) income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10−K of the Company.

/s/ KPMG LLP

March 31, 2008
Miami, Florida
Certified Public Accountants
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-41279) pertaining to the Eateries, Inc. Omnibus Equity
Compensation Plan of our report dated March 26, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Eateries, Inc. for the year ended December
29, 1996, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December
27, 1998.



                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
March 25, 1999
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:92cr4013-WS

EMERSON DAVIS, 4:05cv256-WS

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.

1633) docketed July 25, 2005. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

documents entitled “Jurisdictional Question” (doc. 1631) and “Void Judgment Fraude

[sic] on the Court Lack of Jurisdiction” (doc. 1632) be summarily denied. The defendant

has filed objections (doc. 1638) to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record in light of the defendant’s objections, the court has

determined that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 1633) is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

Case 4:92-cr-04013-WS-CAS Document 1640 Filed 08/19/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:05cv256-WS

2. The defendant’s motions (docs. 1631 & 1632) are hereby summarily DENIED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall close Case No.

4:05cv256-WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this August 19, 2005.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:92-cr-04013-WS-CAS Document 1640 Filed 08/19/05 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BOBBI BOLTON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:03cv307-RH/WCS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

 /

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION

TO: James V. Cook

Attorney for Plaintiff

314 West Jefferson Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32302

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 30 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned will take the

deposition of BOBBI BOLTON, beginning at 9:00 a.m., EST, on the

3rd day of May, 2004, at the Federal Correctional Institution, 331⁄2

Pembroke Road, Danbury, Connecticut 06811, before an officer

authorized to administer oaths. You are authorized to attend and

appear as you deem proper.
2

The deposition shall continue until completed and shall be

taken for all purposes permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

Respectfully submitted,

GREGORY R. MILLER

United States Attorney

 s/ Robert D. Stinson

Robert D. Stinson

Assistant U.S. Attorney

U.S. Attorney’s Office

111 North Adams St., 4th Floor

Tallahassee, FL 32301-1841

(850) 942-8430

FL Bar No. 319406

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing was filed electronically

on this 23rd day of April, 2004, and that James V. Cook, Attorney

for Plaintiff, is registered to be notified by the CM/ECF

electronic mail system.

s/ Robert D. Stinson 

Attorney
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Manfredi, Appellant.

Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on March 6, 1979, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Fein, Markewich and Lupiano, JJ.
SERVED MARCH 2, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

RAYMOND H. FESSLER 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10WP0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0020 

ORDER 

Venue is currently undetermined. 

The agency has requested the matter be set in Los Angeles, CA 

Respondent lists a home address in Idaho Falls, ID. 

Respondent's attorney has an address in Honolulu, HI. 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED as follows: 

on or before March 19, 2010, the parties shall either agree on venue or they shall 

each submit their requests for venue to the undersigned setting forth their reasons for the 

venue request. 

ichard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10WP0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Eric A. Seitz, Respondent's Attorney 

820 Mililani Street, Suite 714 

Honolulu, HI 96813 

TEL: 808-533-7434 

Christopher I. Merrill, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7105 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
149 So.2d 767

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Johnny Stanley SIENDA, McKinley Reddick, Jr., George Donivan.

No. 46559.

Feb. 18, 1963.

The application is denied. Applicant’s remedy, if any, is by appeal. See Marr’s Cr. Jurisprudence of Louisiana 2nd edition, Vols. 1 & 2, Sec. 298, at p. 447. Also State v. Shelton, 227 La. 27, 78 So.2d 498.
No. AP-77,051

In the

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

at Austin



No. 0475122 

In the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas



WARREN DARRELL RIVERS

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee



APPELLANT’S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

WITHIN WHICH TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF



TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

APPELLANT, pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1, 10.5(b) and 38.6(d), moves for an 

extension of time within which to file its appellate brief. In support of its motion, appellant 

submits the following: 

1. Appellant was charged with capital murder.

2. A jury convicted appellant of the charged offense. In accordance with the 

jury’s answers to the special issues, the court sentenced appellant to death on 

November 18, 2014. 

3. Notice of appeal was filed on November 18, 2014. 

4. Appellant’s brief is due on May 18, 2015.

AP-77,051

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 5/12/2015 3:18:46 PM

Accepted 5/12/2015 3:21:45 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
5. Appellant seeks an extension to file his brief until November 18, 2014.

6. The following facts are relied upon to show good cause for the requested

extension:

a. The record in this case is voluminous, consisting of 32 volumes and many

exhibits. 

b. Appellant’s motion is not for purposes of delay, but so that justice may be

done.

WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant the requested extension.

 Respectfully submitted,

 /s/PATRICK MCCANN

 PATRICK MCCANN

 SBN 00792680

 MANDY MILLER

 SPN 24055561

 Attorneys for appellant

 909 Texas Ave., Ste. 205

 Houston, TX 77022

 PHONE (713) 223-3805

 FAX (281) 667-3352

 writlawyer@justice.com

 mandy@mandymillerlegal.com

2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been delivered via

electronic mail to the following address:

Alan Curry

curry_alan@dao.hctx.net

 /s/PATRICK MCCANN

 PATRICK MCCANN

 SBN 00792680

 MANDY MILLER

 SPN 24055561

 Attorneys for appellant

 909 Texas Ave., Ste. 205

 Houston, TX 77022

 PHONE (713) 223-3805

 FAX (281) 667-3352

 writlawyer@justice.com

 mandy@mandymillerlegal.com

3
# L_2022245DE.01007201.xml

| 22.9.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 245/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 245/72

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2021/1256 der Kommission vom 21. April 2021 zur Änderung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2015/35 im Hinblick auf die Einbeziehung von Nachhaltigkeitsrisiken in die Governance von Versicherungs- und Rückversicherungsunternehmen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 277 vom 2. August 2021
  )

Seite 15, Artikel 1 Nummer 1 zur Einfügung der Nummern 55c bis 55e in Artikel 1 der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2015/35, Nummer 55e einleitender Satzteil:

Anstatt:

„
  ‚Nachhaltigkeitspräferenzen‘ die Entscheidung eines Kunden oder potenziellen Kunden darüber, ob und, wenn ja, inwieweit eines der folgenden Finanzinstrumente in seine Anlage einbezogen werden sollte:“

muss es heißen:

„
  ‚Nachhaltigkeitspräferenzen‘ die Entscheidung eines Kunden oder potenziellen Kunden darüber, ob und, wenn ja, inwieweit eines oder mehrere der folgenden Finanzinstrumente in seine Anlage einbezogen werden sollten:“.

---
PUBLIC LAW 108–402—OCT. 30, 2004 118 STAT. 2257

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5027:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Sept. 28, considered and passed House.

Oct. 10, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–402

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 411 Midway

Avenue in Mascotte, Florida, as the ‘‘Specialist Eric Ramirez Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

411 Midway Avenue in Mascotte, Florida, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Specialist Eric Ramirez Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Specialist

Eric Ramirez Post Office’’.

Approved October 30, 2004.

Oct. 30, 2004

[H.R. 5027]
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Form REP-703

Rev. 1, 11/2013

Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 5/7/2014

Sample Number: 141503-001 Date Collected: 04/29/2014 08:49 Date Received: 4/29/2014

Clearwater Pond at Weir 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 20.1 ng/L 2 0.8 TLT 05/02/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141503-002 Date Collected: 04/29/2014 09:02 Date Received: 4/29/2014

Recirculation Pond Outlet at Weir 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 2.14 ng/L 1 0.4 TLT 05/02/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141503-003 Date Collected: 04/29/2014 09:02 Date Received: 4/29/2014

FGD Landfill Discharge to Pond 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 295 ng/L 20 8 TLT 05/02/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141503-004 Date Collected: 04/29/2014 09:22 Date Received: 4/29/2014

WWTP Outlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 352 ng/L 20 8 JAB 05/06/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141503-005 Date Collected: 04/29/2014 09:18 Date Received: 4/29/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 390 ng/L 50 20 JAB 05/06/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141503-006 Date Collected: 04/29/2014 09:17 Date Received: 4/29/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 379 ng/L 50 20 JAB 05/06/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141503-007 Date Collected: 04/29/2014 09:28 Date Received: 4/29/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 2000 ng/L 50 20 JAB 05/06/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Amos Plant, 141503 Page 1 of 2
Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 5/7/2014

Sample Number: 141503-008 Date Collected: 04/29/2014 09:27 Date Received: 4/29/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 2810 ng/L 50 20 JAB 05/06/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141503-009 Date Collected: 04/29/2014 09:32 Date Received: 4/29/2014

WWTP Inlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 172000 ng/L 10000 4000 JAB 05/06/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit

J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Amos Plant, 141503 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KEVIN DONALDSON, AS 

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF 

SARAH C. DONALDSON, DECEASED 

AND KEVIN DONALDSON, AS 

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF 

SARAH C. DONALDSON, ON BEHALF 

OF MICHAEL DONALDSON AND 

PAMELA DOUGLAS, NATURAL 

PARENTS AND STATUTORY HEIRS OF 

DECENDENT SARAH C. DONALDSON

v.

DAVIDSON BROTHERS, INC., MICHAEL 

R. DAVIDSON, AND GEORGE E. 

DONLEY

v.

LJF, INC., AND WILBERT QUADE

PETITION OF: LJF, INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 736 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000755465
<NAME>                        SANDATA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    $
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   NOV-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                1
<CASH>                         1,292,127
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  2,636,643
<ALLOWANCES>                   443,156
<INVENTORY>                    61,074
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               3,789,992
<PP&E>                         14,511,668
<DEPRECIATION>                 7,241,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 11,776,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          2,260,529
<BONDS>                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<COMMON>                       2,481
<OTHER-SE>                     4,252,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   11,776,424
<SALES>                        6,558,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               6,919,758
<CGS>                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  6,774,995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             16,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                128,218
<INCOME-TAX>                   48,325
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            79,893
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   79,893
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                  .04
        


</TABLE>
EX-10.1






IMAX CORPORATION




EXHIBIT 10.1




SUMMARY OF EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENT




Larry O’Reilly



On January 6, 2005, IMAX Corporation (the “Company”) reached an arrangement with Mr. Larry
O’Reilly, Executive Vice President, Theatre Development. Under the arrangement, Mr. O’Reilly
receives an annual base salary of Cdn$263,877 and is entitled to participate in the Company’s
management bonus plan and sales commission plans, which are described in the Company’s Proxy
Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2009 (File
No. 000-24216).
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joseph Wolf, Respondent, v Exxon Corporation, Appellant. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 29, 1979. The board found: "based on the testimony of the claimant and Dr. Galang and Dr. Acquilina, that the claimant lifted two projectors and a screen at work on 11/5/75 and experienced back pain radiating into his leg; that this condition was diagnosed as a herniated disc at L4-L5 and constitutes an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment and the resultant disability is causally related thereto. * * * finds that *758statutory written notice is excused on the grounds that this was an unwitnessed accident, the claimant received prompt medical attention and the self-insured employer was not prejudiced in that it had ample opportunity to make necessary inquiry after timely knowledge of claimant’s hospitalization.” The board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence in all respects and should be affirmed. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur; Staley, Jr., J., not taking part.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6173
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JEFFREY ROY CROSBY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Flor ence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-96-361) Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: April 24, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey Roy Crosby, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Chastain Wicker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for release of exhibits. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion. See Shafer v. Preston Mem'l Hosp. Corp. , 107 F.3d 274, 281-82 (4th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order anddeny Appellant's motion to order the United States Attorney to permit forensic laboratory analysis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 4:20-cv-00181-AW-MJF Document 3-1 Filed 04/17/20 Page 1 of 1