alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5    
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          3664
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  3664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            476
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       31420
<OTHER-SE>                                    (28232)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    3664
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               22664
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22664)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22664)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22664)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
        


</TABLE>
Subpart 4.19 - Basic Safeguarding of Covered

Contractor Information Systems

Parent topic: Part 4 - Administrative and Information Matters

4.1901 Definitions.

As used in this subpart–

Covered contractor information system means an information system that is owned or operated by a

contractor that processes, stores, or transmits Federal contract information.

Federal contract information means information, not intended for public release, that is provided by

or generated for the Government under a contract to develop or deliver a product or service to the

Government, but not including information provided by the Government to the public (such as that

on public Web sites) or simple transactional information, such as that necessary to process

payments.

Information means any communication or representation of knowledge such as facts, data, or

opinions in any medium or form, including textual, numerical, graphic, cartographic, narrative, or

audiovisual (Committee on National Security Systems Instruction (CNSSI) 4009).

Information system means a discrete set of information resources organized for the collection,

processing, maintenance, use, sharing, dissemination, or disposition of information (44 U.S.C. 3502).

Safeguarding means measures or controls that are prescribed to protect information systems.

4.1902 Applicability.

This subpart applies to all acquisitions, including acquisitions of commercial products or commercial

services other than commercially available off-the-shelf items, when a contractor's information

system may contain Federal contract information.

4.1903 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.204-21, Basic Safeguarding of Covered

Contractor Information Systems, in solicitations and contracts when the contractor or a

subcontractor at any tier may have Federal contract information residing in or transiting through its

information system.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7247]

Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, and Executive Order 13372 of February 16, 2005, I hereby determine that the organization known as Falah-i-Insaniat (and other aliases) has committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.

Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 13224 that “for those persons * * * determined to be subject to the order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States * * * prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render these measures ineffectual,” I determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: September 28, 2010.

Hillary Rodham Clinton,

Secretary of State, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-29872 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
### SERVE D MARC H 2 , 201 0 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C INTH EMATTE RO F 

### RAYMON D H . FESSLE R FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10WP000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-002 0 

### ORDE R Venu e i s currentl y undetermined . Th e agenc y ha s requeste dth e matte r b e se t i nLo s Angeles , C A Responden t

list s ahom e addres s i nIdah o Falls , ID . Respondent' s attorne y ha s anaddres s i nHonolulu , HI . WHEREFORE , th e partie s b e an dar e hereb y ORDERE D a s follows : o n o r befor e Marc h19 , 2010 , th e partie s shal l eithe r agre e o nvenu e o r

the y shal l eac hsubmi t

thei r request s for

venu e t o th e undersigne dsettin g fort hthei r reason s for

th e venu e request .

ichar dC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e Law Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP10WP000 2 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Eri c A . Seitz , Respondent' s Attorne y 82 0 Mililan i Street , Suit e 71 4 Honolulu , H I 9681 3 TEL : 808-533-743 4 Christophe r

I . Merrill , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacifi c Region , AWP- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-7105 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Hearin g Docket, Federa

l Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S . W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building - Roo

m 2014 , Washington , DC 20591 , Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
98-1864.

#### State ex rel. Anderson v. Scioto Cty. Probate Court.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
§ 3430.204 Project types and priorities. ( a ) For each RFA, NIFA may develop and include the appropriate project types and focus areas (in addition to the five focus areas identified in § 3430.201) based on the critical needs of the specialty crop industry as identified through stakeholder input and deemed appropriate by NIFA. In making awards for this program, NIFA will give higher priority to projects that are multistate, multi-institutional, and multidisciplinary; and include explicit mechanisms to communicate the results to producers and the public.
( b ) In awarding grants under § 3430.208, priority will be given to grants that address the research and extension priorities established pursuant to section 1408A of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3123a).
[74 FR 45740, Sept. 4, 2009, as amended at 81 FR 6414, Feb. 8, 2016]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DINA PARTIN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.:4:20-cv-00065-RH-CAS

AMTEC LESS LETHAL 

SYSTEMS, INC, 

Defendant.

/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, DINA PARTIN, by and through the undersigned attorney of record

and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby 

dismisses all causes of action in the complaint against Defendant, AMTEC LESS 

LETHAL SYSTEMS, INC., without prejudice.

Defendant has neither filed an answer to the complaint nor a motion for 

summary judgment as to these claims. Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is therefore 

appropriate. 

Respectfully submitted this 16th day of March 2020.

Case 4:20-cv-00065-RH-CAS Document 9 Filed 03/16/20 Page 1 of 2
2

/s/ Matthew D. MacNamara

Matthew D. MacNamara

Florida Bar No. 113002

matt@scottandwallacelaw.com

SCOTT & WALLACE LLP

209 E. Brevard St.

Tallahassee, Florida 32301

Telephone: (850) 222-7777

Facsimile: (850) 222-7778

Attorney for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 16th day of March 2020, the foregoing

Plaintiff’s Notice of Dismissal of Complaint was served on counsel for Defendant 

via this Court’s CM/ECF filing system, as well as by facsimile and electronic mail:

David L. McGee

dlm@beggslane.com

BEGGS & LANE RLLP

501 Commendencia St.

Pensacola, FL 32502

Telephone: (850) 469-3332

Facsimile: (850) 469-3331

Attorney for Defendant

/s/ Matthew D. MacNamara 

 Matthew D. MacNamara (#113002)

Case 4:20-cv-00065-RH-CAS Document 9 Filed 03/16/20 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

FLORIDA PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH

GROUP CITIZEN LOBBY, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 4:02cv408-WS

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL 

PROTECTION AGENCY, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER APPROVING PARTIES’ THIRD STIPULATION

REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Before the court is the parties’ third stipulation regarding briefing schedule. Doc.

131. The court having reviewed the stipulation, it is ORDERED:

1. The parties’ third stipulation (doc. 131) is APPROVED.

2. The parties’ shall abide by the schedule set out in the stipulation.

3. Plaintiffs’ motion to strike (doc. 129) and supporting memorandum (doc. 130)

are WITHDRAWN.

DONE AND ORDERED this December 19, 2005.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:02-cv-00408-WS-WCS Document 133 Filed 12/19/05 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 VS CASE NO. 4:96-CR-69-02 RLH 

 DANIEL D. WHEELIS

FINANCIAL REFERRAL AND ORDER

Regarding release of funds for: Fine, X Restitution, Filing Fee, Attorney Admission Fee,

 Copy Fee, Bond, Other (Specify) 

By: Daniel D. Wheelis #10559-017 (Payee)

Address: USP Leavenworth

PO Box 1000

Leavenworth, KS 66048

Receipt Numbers 802 107149-05 Date of Receipts 04/12/05 

Motion: N/A

Explanation: Daniel Wheelis was ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $2,352.00, jointly and

severally with co-defendants. The restitution has been jointly and severally paid. On April 12, 2005,

$25.00 was received from the March 2005 Bureau of Prisons report. Resulting in an overpayment of

$25.00. Requesting authorization to refund the overpayment of $25.00 to Mr. Wheelis and any additional

money we may receive from him in this case. There may be a timing difference in the Bureau of Prisons

stopping the payments from Mr. Wheelis account.

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, Clerk of Court

Prepared by: ____s/Philip Detweiler___________

 Philip Detweiler, Financial Specialist Date: June 1, 2005 

ORDER OF COURT

It is ORDERED this 1st day of June, 2005, that the Clerk refund the identified funds to co-defendant

Pamela Jo Warner, for the reasons set forth in the separate order entered this date.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Adopted: 12/03/99

Case 4:96-cr-00069-RH Document 209 Filed 06/01/05 Page 1 of 1
| skip navigation     español
Kid's Zone Get InvolvedContact UsEspañol                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Home
President's Vision
• Who We Are• Advisory Commission
News
• What's New• Publications
Tool Kits
• Early Childhood• Elementary• Secondary• Post Secondary• Safe and Drug Free
Bridging the Gap
• Call to Service Special ThanksPrivacy Policy   |  | Ten Reasons to Become a TeacherAmerica's Children Are Counting On You
As a former public school teacher and librarian, Mrs. Laura Bush knows firsthand the rewards that come from teaching."People all across our great nation express their desire to make a difference in America, to share their pride in our country's values, to shape the future of our children," Mrs. Bush says in her forward to the list."When they ask me what they can do to find personal and professional satisfaction, my advice is simple: become a teacher....The challenges of teaching are outnumbered only by the rewards that come from helping children realize their dreams."

For more information call:**1-800-USA-LEARN1-877-4ED-PUBS**or visit:TheNewTeacherProject.orgTeachForAmerica.org

  |  |  |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 6.23

                 AGREEMENT FOR RETIREMENT OF KCD HOLDINGS OPTION
          SHARES, DATED SEPTEMBER 12, 1996, BY AND BETWEEN THE COMPANY
                          AND DENISE VAN DAALEN WETTERS

<PAGE>   2

                               September 12, 1996

Ms. Denise van Daalen Wetters
2835 Townsgate Road, Suite 110
Westlake Village, CA 91361

    Re:      Retirement of KCD Holdings ("KCD") Option Shares

Dear Denise:

    In connection with your agreement to tender to KCD for retirement the
100,000 shares of KCD common stock issued to you upon exercise of "Option 1" and
"Option 2" under paragraph 4.1.1 of your Employment Agreement with KCD dated
August 15, 1995, KCD has agreed to extend the Option 1 exercise period through
and including the expiration of the Option 2 exercise period set forth in
paragraph 4.1.1 of your Employment Agreement.

    If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please act to countersign this
letter where indicated hereinbelow and return same to KCD.

                                             Sincerely,

                                             KCD HOLDINGS INCORPORATED



                                             Wellington Ewen, President

AGREED AND ACCEPTED:


--------------------------------
Denise van Daalen Wetters
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:89cr4013-WS

NORMAN SPRATLEY, 4:06cv358-WS

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 418)

docketed October 12, 2007. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

section 2255 motion be denied. The defendant has filed objections (doc. 419) to the

report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record in light of the defendant’s objections, this court has

determined that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 418) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

Case 4:89-cr-04013-WS-WCS Document 420 Filed 11/09/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:89cr4013-WS

2. The defendant’s amended section 2255 motion (doc. 412) is hereby DENIED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

4. The clerk shall close Case No. 4:06cv358-WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of November , 2007.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:89-cr-04013-WS-WCS Document 420 Filed 11/09/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.32


 


Summary of Equifax Inc.


Annual Incentive Plan Summary


(As of March 9, 2005)


 


 


Equifax’s Annual
Incentive Plan, adopted under the shareholder-approved Key Management Long-Term
Incentive Plan, is a management incentive program (covering approximately 30%
of Equifax’s global workforce) that provides cash compensation to participants
based upon the achievement of certain financial and individual objectives
appropriate for the business for which they perform services. Bonus amounts for
achievement of target levels of performance are established based on each
participant’s position.  Performance is
measured at either the business unit or corporate level, in alignment with the
entity for which the participant performs services.  Target opportunities are expressed as a
percentage of base salary.


Annual bonuses are earned
based on company and individual performance against the specific criteria
established which are allocated as follows: 
corporate earnings per share or business unit profit (which represents
65% of target bonus), corporate or business unit revenue (which represents 15%
of target bonus) and performance against individual objectives (which
represents 20% of target bonus).  The
financial measures to be used for target bonuses require the achievement of
outstanding company performance relative to expectations. A threshold level of
performance is set (typically representing no less than the prior year’s actual
performance) at which level the Annual Incentive would be 25% of the targeted
bonus.  No incentive is paid if
performance falls below this threshold. The maximum opportunity for all Annual
Incentive participants is two times the targeted percentage. The maximum is
payable only if significant and challenging financial performance goals are
achieved.


Corporate, business unit
and personal goals are established at the beginning of each annual measurement
period.  The Compensation, Human
Resources and Management Succession Committee approves goals for all plans covering
Executive Officers within the first 90 days of the measurement period and
determines their degree of achievement following the end of the performance
period.
§ 3560.704 Unauthorized assistance determination notice. ( a ) The Agency will notify borrowers, in writing, when a determination has been made that unauthorized assistance was received by the borrower. Borrowers will notify tenants, in writing, when a determination is made that unauthorized assistance was received by the tenant and will simultaneously send the Agency of copy of the written notice to the tenant.
( b ) The unauthorized assistance determination notice is a preliminary notice, not a demand letter. The unauthorized assistance determination notice will: ( 1 ) Specify the reasons the assistance was determined to be unauthorized;
( 2 ) State the amount of unauthorized assistance to be repaid and specify the party responsible for repayment of the unauthorized assistance (*i.e.*, the tenant or borrower) according to the provision of § 3560.708;
( 3 ) Establish a place and time when the person receiving the unauthorized assistance determination notice may meet with the Agency or, in the case of tenants, may meet with the borrower, to discuss issues related to the unauthorized assistance notice such as the establishment of a repayment schedule; and
( 4 ) Advise the borrower or tenant that they may present facts, figures, written records, or other information within a specified period of time which might alter the determination that the assistance received was unauthorized.
( c ) Upon request, the Agency or borrower, in the case of tenants, will grant additional time for discussions related to an unauthorized assistance determination notice. Borrowers must notify the Agency of schedule revisions when additional time is granted to a tenant in unauthorized assistance claims.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of TWC Holding LLC (the “Company”) for the quarterly period endedJuly 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian A. Lutes, Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: August 15, 2006

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Brian A. Lutes                     |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Brian  A. Lutes                        |
|   |   | Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

 

 

----