alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2227 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2227

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to remove 
  the 100 percent tariff imposed on roasted chicory and other roasted 
                          coffee substitutes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2006

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to remove 
  the 100 percent tariff imposed on roasted chicory and other roasted 
                          coffee substitutes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF 100 PERCENT TARIFF ON ROASTED CHICORY AND OTHER 
              ROASTED COFFEE SUBSTITUTES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter III of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking heading 
9903.02.37.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Chapter 21 of such Schedule is amended 
by striking footnote 1 to subheading 2101.30.00.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          81,865
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             196
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                77,548
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    354,436
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         160,132
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           168,419
<LOANS>                                      1,680,195
<ALLOWANCE>                                     23,291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,429,651
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,008,963
<SHORT-TERM>                                    60,847
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             25,188
<LONG-TERM>                                     95,234
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,609
<OTHER-SE>                                     223,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,429,651
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                149,032
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               30,282
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 3,113
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               182,427
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              78,642
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,239
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           95,188
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,438
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 331
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 61,726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,848
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      47,848
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,497
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.52
<LOANS-NON>                                     13,351
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,673
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                21,099
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,416
<RECOVERIES>                                       425
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               23,291
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            23,291
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
          REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
                       OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         I, Eric Bello, Treasurer (principal financial officer) of Quipp, Inc.,
a Florida corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my
knowledge:


         (1)      The Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended
                  December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                      *   *   *




/s/ ERIC BELLO
---------------------------------------
Eric Bello
Treasurer (principal financial officer)

Date:    March 29, 2005
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Guillermo Puente v. Alicia Marie Puente

Appellate case number: 01-18-00583-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-34059

Trial court: 280th District Court of Harris County

Guillermo Puente has filed a Motion to Remove Filings From Website, in which he 

requests that “all filings made in the above styled cause number be removed from the website.”

His motion is DISMISSED because this court lacks jurisdiction to hear motions in this appeal 

due to the expiration of the court’s plenary power. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1(a), 19.3.

Justice’s signature: /s/ Gordon Goodman

Acting individually

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss.

Date: March 12, 2020
Exhibit 23

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

      99 High Street       Telephone 617 988 1000       Telefax 617 988 0800
      Boston, MA 02110-2371




                       Consent of Independent Auditors
                       -------------------------------

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
 of Westerbeke Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(File No. 33-24435 and 333-25687) on Form S-8 of Westerbeke Corporation of 
our report dated December 23, 1998 relating to the consolidated balance 
sheets of Westerbeke Corporation and subsidiary as of October 24, 1998 and 
October 25, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, 
changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the 
three-year period ended October 24, 1998, and related schedule, which report 
appears in the October 24, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Westerbeke 
Corporation.



                                       By /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                       ----------------------------

Boston, Massachusetts
January 20, 1999
Exhibit
32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Trans World Entertainment Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Robert J. Higgins,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John J. Sullivan,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                      |  |                                                        
|------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Higgins                 |  | /s/ John J. Sullivan                                   
|                                      |  |                                                        
|Chairman and Chief
 Executive Officer |  | Executive Vice President
 and 
 Chief Financial Officer
|                                      |  |                                                        
|April 16, 2009                        |  | April 16, 2009                                         

This certification shall not
be deemed to be filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by reference
into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, unless specifically identified as being incorporated therein by
reference.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Trans World Entertainment and will be retained by
Trans World Entertainment and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

F-31

---
CERTIFICATION



I, Bruce Hollingshead, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I (we) have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (Evaluation Date); and

(c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were any significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.







/s/ Bruce Hollingshead

Date: April 24, 2007

Bruce Hollingshead, President/Director

Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANDREW LAUD BARNETT, AKA 

Anthony Andrew Delrossey,

Defendant - Appellant.

Nos. 23-1078

 23-1082

 23-1081

D.C. Nos. 3:12-cr-00441-HZ-1

 3:08-cr-00165-HZ-1

 3:11-cr-00386-HZ-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Marco A. Hernández, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 12, 2023**

Before: WALLACE, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Andrew Laud Barnett appeals from the district 

court’s judgments and challenges the aggregate sentence imposed upon the second 

revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 18 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-1078

We dismiss in part and affirm in part. 

During the pendency of this appeal, Barnett completed his term of 

imprisonment. Because Barnett is not serving a term of supervised release in 

Appeal Nos. 23-1082 and 23-1081, these appeals are moot. See United States v. 

King, 891 F.3d 868, 869-70 (9th Cir. 2018).

In Appeal No. 23-1078, Barnett contends that the district court procedurally 

erred by failing to consider his arguments and adequately explain its sentencing 

decision. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 

F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude that there is none. The record 

reflects that the district court considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) factors and

Barnett’s arguments for a time-served sentence, and sufficiently explained that the 

five-month sentence was warranted in light of Barnett’s repeated failure to comply 

with the terms of his supervision despite repeated admonishments by the court. 

See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). 

Moreover, the below-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the

§ 3583(e) factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Barnett’s repeated 

breaches of the court’s trust, his history and characteristics, and the need for 

deterrence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). 

We do not reach Barnett’s argument that the district court relied on an 

impermissible sentencing factor, which he raised for the first time in his reply 
3 23-1078

brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Appeal Nos. 23-1081 and 23-1082 DISMISSED; 

Appeal No. 23-1078 AFFIRMED.
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Driftwood  Ventures,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Date:  September 11, 2006


/s/ Steven Chan
---------------------------------
Steven Chan, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 301.85 Quarantine; restriction on interstate movement of specified regulated articles. ( a ) *Notice of quarantine.* Under the authority of sections 411, 412, 414, and 434 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7711, 7712, 7714, and 7754), the Secretary of Agriculture quarantines the State of New York in order to prevent the spread of the golden nematode (*Globodera rostochiensis*), which causes a dangerous disease of potatoes and certain other plants and is not widely prevalent or distributed within and throughout the United States. Through the aforementioned authorities, the Secretary imposes a quarantine on the State of New York with respect to the interstate movement from that State of regulated articles, issues regulations in this subpart governing the movement of such articles, and gives notice of this quarantine action.
( b ) *Quarantine restrictions on the interstate movement of regulated articles.* No common carrier or other person shall move interstate from any quarantined State any regulated articles, except in accordance with the conditions prescribed in this subpart.
( c ) *List of regulated articles.* The Deputy Administrator has determined that certain articles present a hazard of spread of golden nematodes. A list of all such regulated articles is found on the internet at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/golden-nematode/nematodes*. Lists of all regulated articles may also be obtained by request from any local PPQ office; local offices are listed in telephone directories and on the internet at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/ppq-program-overview/sphd*.
( d ) *Normal process for designating additional regulated articles.* ( 1 ) If the Deputy Administrator determines that an article not already listed at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/golden-nematode/nematodes* presents a hazard of spread of golden nematodes, APHIS will publish a notice in the Federal Register proposing to designate the article as a regulated article for golden nematode. The notice will provide the basis for this determination, and will request public comment.
( 2 ) If no comments are received on the notice, or if the comments do not change the Deputy Administrator's determination, APHIS will publish a second notice in the Federal Register designating the article as a regulated article for golden nematode and listing it.
( e ) *Immediate designation of regulated articles.* An inspector may designate any other article, product, or means of conveyance as a regulated article, if the inspector determines that it presents a hazard of spread of golden nematodes, and after the person in possession of the article has been so notified.
[87 FR 80013, Dec. 29, 2022]
# L_2020326EN.01001401.xml

| 8.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 326/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 326/14

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1201 of 14 August 2020 as regards measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.)

(
  Official journal of the European Union L 269 of 17 August 2020
  )

Annex I,
  “List of plants known to be susceptible to one or more subspecies of the specified pest (‘host plants’)”,

“List of plants known to be susceptible to one or more subspecies of the specified pest (‘host plants’)

| – | On page 23: |
| --- | --- |

–

On page 23:

for :

« Coelorachis cylindrica (Michx.) Nash Coffea”

read:

“
  Coelorachis cylindrica (Michx.) Nash

Coffea
  ”

| – | On page 26 : |
| --- | --- |

–

On page 26 :

for:

“
  UlexUlmus
  ”

read:

“
  Ulex

Ulmus
  ”

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Leo Stein, Respondent, v New York Times Company et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 21, 1979, which held that claimant was disabled by reason of an occupational disease. Claimant, who had worked as a newspaper pressman for over 29 years, filed a disability claim due to occupational disease in the nature of asthmatic bronchitis and emphysema due to prolonged exposure to dust, fumes and ink. The claim was controverted and after hearings a referee held that claimant was disabled due to occupational hazards. Upon application by the employer and its carrier for review, the board rescinded the referee’s decision and referred the case to the Chairman of the Workers’ Compensation Board for the designation of an impartial specialist. Following the receipt of the specialist’s report and the taking of his testimony, the board affirmed the referee’s decision. This appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier ensued. While the specialist’s report and testimony did not clearly establish a causal relationship between claimant’s disability and his working conditions, both the report and oral evidence referred to recent medical studies in the printing industry suggestive of a positive relationship between bronchitis and the occupation of pressman. Juxtaposing this proof with that of claimant’s doctor who unconditionally testified that claimant’s occupation was the causative factor of his aggravated bronchitis and emphysema, the board affirmed the referee’s conclusion and found an occupational disease. We agree. Under the applicable statute (Workers’ Compensation Law, § 21) there is a continuing presumption that the claimant’s occupational disease was work related. The Court of Appeals has held that where, as here, there is some evidence to rebut the statutory presumption, such proof is insufficient to work that effect if the board does not credit such evidence *(Matter of Daly v Opportunities for Broome,*39 NY2d 862). In the instant case, the board rejected the specialist’s proof and relied on the testimony of claimant’s physician who stated that claimant’s constant inhalation of various noxious substances present in the environment of his employment caused the claimant’s disabling condition. The board was free to choose between conflicting medical opinions, each based on the same facts, and was free to resolve the conflicting medical views by crediting one and rejecting the other *(Matter of Rodriguez v Atlantic Gummed Paper Corp.,*61 AD2d 873). We cannot say the board’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents filing briefs against the employer and its insurance carrier. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur; Staley, Jr., J., not taking part.