alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 371.10 Legislative and Public Affairs. ( a ) *General statement.* Legislative and Public Affairs (LPA) is the communications arm of APHIS.
( b ) *Director of LPA.* The Director of LPA is responsible for: ( 1 ) Advising and assisting the Administrator and other officials on matters relating to agency legislative and media affairs.
( 2 ) Preparing legislative proposals for APHIS programs and responsibilities. Assisting in compiling support material for agency witnesses for congressional hearings. Preparing legislative reports.
( 3 ) Establishing and maintaining liaison with Members of Congress, various congressional committees and subcommittees, and their staffs on matters pertaining to APHIS.
( 4 ) Planning and conducting an information program to promote interest in and increase the public knowledge of APHIS programs and activities.
( 5 ) Drafting and administering policy guidelines on press contacts, photography, audiovisual activities, graphic design, radio-TV, and policy/editorial/graphics clearances for publications. Planning and conducting a program to explain APHIS policies in written form to Members of Congress, State and industry leaders, officials of foreign governments, and private citizens.
( 6 ) Preparing replies to written inquiries and establishing and maintaining a system for the control of written inquiries referred by the Office of the Secretary or sent directly to the agency.
( 7 ) Assisting in the preparation of position papers regarding APHIS programs.
( 8 ) Assisting in the preparation of directives, procedural manuals, articles for publication, and agency correspondence. Coordinating APHIS activities within the scope of the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act.
§ 4280.106 Conflict of interest. ( a ) *General.* No conflict of interest or appearance of conflict of interest will be allowed. Conflict of interest means a situation in which a person has personal, professional, or financial interests that prevent, or appears to prevent the person from acting impartially. For purposes of this subpart, conflict of interest includes, but is not limited to, distribution or payment of grant, guaranteed loan funds, and matching funds to a beneficiary or immediate family member of the applicant.
( b ) *Assistance to employees, relatives, and associates.* The Agency will process any requests for assistance under this subpart in accordance with 7 CFR part 1900, subpart D.
( c ) *Member/delegate clause.* No member of or delegate to Congress shall receive any share or part of this grant or any benefit that may arise there from; but this provision shall not be construed to bar, as a contractor under the grant, a publicly held corporation whose ownership might include a member of Congress.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel

BRANDI STUART and BRANDI STUART,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5602-MCR/HTC

TRACY HARRELL; SIMPLY 

SOUTHERN STYLES CORP.; 

EMMA JEAN KIDS, LLC; 

BANANA SPLIT, LLC; THREE 

SISTERS DESIGNS, LLC; and 

MILLIE JAY, LLC,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Lift Seal and Permit Service 

of Process. The Court notes that due an inadvertent docketing error, the prior order 

unsealing this matter was mistakenly filed under seal. Accordingly, the motion is 

GRANTED as follows:

1. The Clerk is directed to unseal the Court’s prior order, ECF No. 4, and 

comply with all requirements stated therein, including to unseal the complaint and 

the Government’s Notice of Election to Decline Intervention. The parties are

directed to review and comply with all terms of that order as well. 

Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 6 Filed 11/19/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

CASE NO. 5:20cv199-MCR-MJF

2. The Plaintiffs are ordered to serve process on Defendants within 120 

days of the date of this Order. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of November 2020.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 6 Filed 11/19/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 355.20 Marketing and notification requirements for plants imported, exported, or reexported by means other than mail.[4] ( a ) Any terrestrial plant which is to be imported, exported, or reexported by means other than mail and which may be imported, exported, or reexported under 50 CFR part 17 or part 23 only if accompanied by documentation, shall at the time of importation, exportation, or reexportation plainly and correctly bear on the outer container or on a tag, invoice, packing list, or other document accompanying the plant, the following information: ( 1 ) Genus and species, and quantity of each (if a hybrid, genus of each parent, and quantity of each hybrid),
( 2 ) Country and locality where collected from the wild or where produced from cultivated stock,
( 3 ) Name and address (in the United States if exported or reexported) of shipper, owner or person shipping or forwarding the plants,
( 4 ) Name and address (in the United States if imported) of consignee,
( 5 ) Identifying shipper's mark and number, and
( 6 ) Serial number and type (e.g., permit, certificate) of document issued for the importation, exportation, or reexportation of the plant.
( b ) Promptly upon arrival at a port of import (listed in 50 CFR part 24, or, if allowed by the U.S. Department of the Interior, at a nondesignated port) of any terrestrial plant which is imported by means other than mail and which may be imported under 50 CFR part 17 or part 23 only if accompanied by documentation, the importer shall notify Plant Protection and Quarantine of the arrival and of the genus and species of the plant by such means as a manifest, Customs entry document, commercial invoice, waybill, broker's document, or notice form provided for that purpose.
( c ) Prior to the exportation or reexportation of any terrestrial plant which is to be exported or reexported by other than mail and which may be exported or reexported under 50 CFR part 17 or part 23 only if accompanied by documentation, the exporter or reexporter shall notify Plant Protection and Quarantine of the intended exportation or reexportation and of the genus and species of the plant by such means as a manifest, commercial invoice, waybill, broker's document, or notice form provided for that purpose.
(Information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Budget and Management under control number 0579-0076) [49 FR 42912, Oct. 25, 1984, as amended at 70 FR 57995, Oct. 5, 2005] Footnotes -
355.20
[4] Certain terrestrial plants listed in Appendices I, II, or III of the Convention or determined by the U.S. Department of the Interior to be endangered or threatened or similar in appearance to endangered or threatened species are required to be accompanied by documentation at the time of importation, exportation, or reexportation (see 50 CFR chapter I). Plants are allowed to be imported, exported or reexported only at ports authorized for such purposes by the U.S. Department of the Interior, or, under certain circumstances as determined by the U.S. Department of the Interior, at nondesignated ports, pursuant to section 9(f) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1538(f)). (see 50 CFR part 24 for a list of designated ports.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           25687
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2343
<ALLOWANCES>                                       461
<INVENTORY>                                       1164
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 36229
<PP&E>                                          282283
<DEPRECIATION>                                   59846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  389135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            54920
<BONDS>                                         155000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           163
<OTHER-SE>                                      159649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    389135
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                331078
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   151860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                154943
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               21596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3117
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1547
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1570
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1570
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TANIELA F. KIVALU,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

NORTHCENTRAL UNIVERSITY;

TRUSTEE BOARD MEMBERS OF
NORTHCENTRAL UNIVERSITY;
MICHAEL CAHILL; SAM BARSTOSKY;
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION;
UNITED STATES CREDIT BUREAUS;
UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Others,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 21

- 16811

D.C. No

. 2:21

- cv

- 00379

- SPL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2023 * *

Before : CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Taniela F. Kivalu appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 30 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 16811

dismissing his action alleging federal disability discrimination claims

. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Watison v. Carter , 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir.

2012). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Kivalu’s action because Kivalu failed

to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief. See Hebbe v. Pliler

,

627 F.3d 338, 341

- 42 (9t h Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are construed

liberally, a plaintiff must present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible

claim for relief).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief

, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

All pending requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:96-cr-00020-MP-AK

JOHN CALVIN EVERETT,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This case is before the Court on yet another series of motions (docs. 466, 467 and 469)

that seek to reassert the claims that were raised and rejected in the orders at docs. 465, 463, 456,

453, 451, 441, 432, 421, 418, and 413. The motions are therefore denied. Additionally, the

Clerk is directed to not accept for filing any further motions from Mr. Everett unless they allege

imminent threat of serious physical harm.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of October, 2007

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:96-cr-00020-MW-GRJ Document 471 Filed 10/09/07 Page 1 of 1
12.102 Applicability.

(a) This part shall be used for the acquisition of supplies or services that meet the definitions of

“commercial product” or “commercial service” at 2.101.

(b) Contracting officers shall use the policies in this part in conjunction with the policies and

procedures for solicitation, evaluation and award prescribed in part 13, Simplified Acquisition

Procedures; part 14, Sealed Bidding; or part 15, Contracting by Negotiation, as appropriate for the

particular acquisition.

(c) Contracts for the acquisition of commercial products or commercial services are subject to the

policies in other parts of the FAR. When a policy in another part of the FAR is inconsistent with a

policy in this part, this part 12 shall take precedence for the acquisition of commercial products or

commercial services.

(d) The definition of commercial product uses the phrase “purposes other than governmental

purposes”. These purposes are those that are not unique to a government.

(e) This part shall not apply to the acquisition of commercial products or commercial services—

(1) At or below the micro-purchase threshold;

(2) Using the Standard Form 44 (see 13.306);

(3) Using the imprest fund (see 13.305);

(4) Using the Governmentwide commercial purchase card as a method of purchase rather than only

as a method of payment; or

(5) Directly from another Federal agency.

(f)

(1) Contracting officers may treat any acquisition of supplies or services that, as determined by the

head of the agency, are to be used to facilitate defense against or recovery from cyber, nuclear,

biological, chemical, or radiological attack, as an acquisition of commercial products or commercial

services.

(2) A contract in an amount greater than $20 million that is awarded on a sole source basis for a

product or service treated as a commercial product or commercial service under paragraph (f)(1) of

this section but does not meet the definition of a commercial product or commercial service as

defined at FAR 2.101 shall not be exempt from—

(i) Cost accounting standards (see subpart 30.2); or

(ii) Certified cost or pricing data requirements (see 15.403).

Parent topic: Subpart 12.1 - Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services
1 - 1

CHAPTER 1

RADIO DIRECTION FINDER AND RADAR STATIONS

PART I RADIO DIRECTION FINDER STATIONS

100A. General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

100B. Accuracy of Bearings Furnished by Direction Finding Stations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

100C. Obligations of Administrations Operating Direction Finding Stations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

100D. Procedure to Obtain Radio Direction Finder Bearings and Positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

100E. Plotting Radio Bearings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

100F. Radio Bearing Conversion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

100G. Direction Finding Station List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Station List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

PART II RADAR STATIONS

110A. Coast and Port Radar Station List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Station List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal Acquisition Regulation

Part 19 - Small Business Programs

Part 20 - Reserved

Part 21 - Reserved

Part 22 - Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions

Part 23 - Environment, Energy and Water Efficiency, Renewable Energy Technologies,

Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free Workplace

Part 24 - Protection of Privacy and Freedom of Information

Part 25 - Foreign Acquisition

Part 26 - Other Socioeconomic Programs

Parent topic: Subchapter D - Socioeconomic Programs
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:94cr4021-WS

ARTHUR JEROME MARTIN,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 364)

docketed September 28, 2007. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

“writ of habeas corpus” (doc. 363) be summarily dismissed. The defendant has filed no

objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 364) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

Case 4:94-cr-04021-WS-WCS Document 365 Filed 11/09/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:94cr4021-WS

2. The defendant’s “writ of habeas corpus” (doc. 363) is hereby summarily

DISMISSED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of November , 2007.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:94-cr-04021-WS-WCS Document 365 Filed 11/09/07 Page 2 of 2
(December 18, 1979)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony O’Brien, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 6, 1977, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, without a hearing, of defendant’s motion to *657dismiss the indictment on the ground of denial of a speedy trial as required by statute and the due process clauses of the State and Federal Constitutions. Case remanded to Criminal Term to hear and report on defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment upon the ground of denial to him of his right to a speedy trial and appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Criminal Term is to file its report with all convenient speed. The court denied defendant’s speedy trial motion without a hearing. The denial of the motion' prevented the defendant from proving, as he must, that the People were not ready for trial within the specified time (see CPL 30.30, subd 1, par [a]; 210.45, subd 7) and eliminated any need for the District Attorney to show that the delay or some portion of it might be excluded pursuant to the provisions of CPL 30.30. The present record is not sufficiently complete to permit a proper review. A hearing should be held on these points and findings made with respect to these issues. With commendable candor, the District Attorney in his brief concedes that a hearing should be held in order to permit a proper review of the speedy trial issue by this court. Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Cohalan and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
§ 3550.116 Definitions applicable to WWD grants only. ( a ) *Colonia.* Any identifiable community designated in writing by the State or county in which it is located; determined to be a colonia on the basis of objective criteria including lack of a potable water supply, lack of adequate sewage systems, and lack of decent, safe, and sanitary housing, inadequate roads, and drainage; and existed and was generally recognized as a colonia before October 1, 1989.
( b ) *Individual.* Resident of a colonia located in a rural area.
( c ) *Rural areas.* Includes unincorporated areas and any city or town with a population not in excess of 10,000 inhabitants. The population figure is obtained from the most recent decennial Census of the United States (decennial Census). If the applicable population figure cannot be obtained from the most recent decennial Census, RD will determine the applicable population figure based on available population data.
( d ) *System.* A community or central water supply or waste disposal system.
( e ) *WWD.* Water and Waste Disposal grants to individuals.
[67 FR 78331, Dec. 24, 2002, as amended at 80 FR 9911, Feb. 24, 2015]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Canup, Case No. 8:20cv14021

Case No. 3:19md2885

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Hope T. Cannon

ORDER

The Court has been informed that the Parties have reached a settlement of this 

matter. See ECF No. 53. Therefore, the Court hereby DISMISSES the aboveentitled action from the active docket of the Court. In the event the settlement is not 

consummated, the Court reserves the power to reopen the case for further 

proceedings on motion filed by any party within thirty (30) days of the date of this 

Order and a showing of good cause. At this time, the Clerk is directed to close the 

file in this case for administrative purposes. At the expiration of thirty (30) days 

without activity, the Clerk is directed to close the case in its entirety for all purposes.

DONE and ORDERED on this 19th day of September 2024.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 8:20-cv-14021-MCR-HTC Document 55 Filed 09/19/24 Page 1 of 1
#### § 29.20 Sampler.

Person employed, licensed, or authorized by the Secretary to select, tag, and seal official samples of tobacco.
Wimax EU, Ltd
                      Minutes of Board of Directors Meeting
                                January 10, 2005



At 10:00 am, on January 10, 2005, the Board of Directors met to discuss new
business and capitalization strategies. The meeting was attended by Christopher
Miles and Margot Miles via the internet. The Directors discussed the need for
capitalization as well as the possibility of the company repurchasing some of
Christopher Miles' stock at some point in the future in order reduce the total
number of shares outstanding and to make the company more attractive to
prospective executives who might be interested in joining the company in the
future. In this meeting it was:

RESOLVED that in return for an agreement from Christopher to grant the company a
two year option to repurchase up to 8 million of his shares of stock at a rate
of $.025 per share, the company will grant Christopher a two year option to
purchase up to 4 million shares of the company's stock for $.50 per share. It is

FURTHER RESOLVED that the company agree to file a registration document on the 4
million shares as represented by the option granted and it will also include
Miles remaining share in this registration as well. The option period will begin
at such time as the registration is declared effective by the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

There being no further business to conduct the meeting was adjourned.

Signed this 10th day of January, 2005


/s/ Christopher Miles
-----------------------------------------------
Christopher Miles, President/Secretary


<PAGE>