Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices 73039 

3 If one of the above named companies does not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks from the 

PRC who have not qualified for a separate rate are 

deemed to be covered by this review as part of the 

single PRC entity of which the named exporters are 

a part. 

4 In the notice of initiation for September 

anniversary cases, published in the Federal 

Register on October 28, 2008 (75 FR 66349) and 

corrected on November 10, 2010 (75 FR 69054), the 

Department postponed initiation of five companies. 

We have determined to initiate on two of the 

companies (listed above). Regarding the three 

additional companies, the Department does not 

conduct administrative reviews to investigate 

transshipment allegations. See Globe Metallurgical 

Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 10–100 (Ct. Int’l 

Trade Sept. 1, 2010). Petitioners (SSW Holding 

Company, Inc. and Nashville Wire Products, Inc.) 

have not provided any reason, other than potential 

transshipment of subject merchandise, for 

requesting a review of these three additional 

companies. Therefore, we are not initiating a review 

with respect to the following companies: Asia 

Pacific CIS (Thailand) Co., Ltd.; Taiwan Rail 

Company; and King Shan Wire Co., Ltd. 

5 If one of the above-named companies does not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the PRC who 

have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to 

be covered by this review as part of the single PRC 

entity of which the named exporter is a part. 

6 In the notice of initiation for September 

anniversary cases, published in the Federal 

Register on October 28, 2008 (75 FR 66349) and 

corrected on November 10, 2010 (75 FR 69054), the 

Department postponed initiation of five companies. 

We have determined to initiate on two of the 

companies (listed above). Regarding the three 

additional companies, the Department does not 

conduct administrative reviews to investigate 

transshipment allegations. See Globe Metallurgical 

Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 10–100 (Ct. Int’l 

Trade Sept. 1, 2010). Petitioners (SSW Holding 

Company, Inc. and Nashville Wire Products, Inc.) 

have not provided any reason, other than potential 

transshipment of subject merchandise, for 

requesting a review of these three additional 

companies. Therefore, we are not initiating a review 

with respect to the following companies: Asia 

Pacific CIS (Thailand) Co., Ltd.; Taiwan Rail 

Company; and King Shan Wire Co., Ltd. 

Period to be 

reviewed 

Transtek Automotive Products Co. Ltd. 

Tri-star Trading Co. 

Uasha Group International Shanghai Ltd. 

Universal Houseware (Dongguan) 

Wenzhou N. & A. Foreign Trade Corp. 

Wenzhou Pan Pacific Foreign Trade Co., Ltd. 

Wesken International (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. 

World Trading Service Limited. 

X&Y Papa-Fix Industry Limited. 

Yiwu Ao-Si Metal Products Co., Ltd. 

Zhangjiagang Maohua Coating & Adorn 

Zhejiang Arts and Crafts Import. 

Zhejiang Huamao International Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Lucky Cloud Hanger Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Wenzhou Packaging Imp. & Exp. 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

The People’s Republic of China: Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks 6 C–570–942 ............................................................. 1/7/09–12/31/09 

Asia Pacific CIS (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. 

Hengtong Hardware Manufacturing (Huizhou) Co., Ltd. 

Suspension Agreements 

None. 

During any administrative review 

covering all or part of a period falling 

between the first and second or third 

and fourth anniversary of the 

publication of an antidumping duty 

order under section 351.211 or a 

determination under section 

351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or 

suspended investigation (after sunset 

review), the Secretary, if requested by a 

domestic interested party within 30 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the review, will 

determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. 

United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed Cir. 

2002), as appropriate, whether 

antidumping duties have been absorbed 

by an exporter or producer subject to the 

review if the subject merchandise is 

sold in the United States through an 

importer that is affiliated with such 

exporter or producer. The request must 

include the name(s) of the exporter or 

producer for which the inquiry is 

requested. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable for the POR. 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On 

January 22, 2008, the Department 

published Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Documents Submission Procedures; 

APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 

22, 2008). Those procedures apply to 

administrative reviews included in this 

notice of intiation. Parties wishing to 

participate in any of these 

administrative reviews should ensure 

that they meet the requirements of these 

procedures (e.g., the filing of separate 

letters of appearance as discussed in 19 

CFR 351.103(d)). 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 1675(a)), and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: November 22, 2010. 

Susan H. Kuhbach, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29970 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Renewable Energy and Energy 

Efficiency Advisory Committee 

(RE&EEAC) 

November 22, 2010. 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting; 

Correction. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce published a document in the 

Federal Register of November 17, 2010 

concerning a notification of an open 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

73040 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices 

1The petitioner is Seaman Paper Company of 

Massachusetts, Inc. 

meeting of the Renewable Energy and 

Energy Efficiency Advisory Committee 

(RE&EEAC) on December 7, 2010. The 

document contained an incorrect e-mail 

address and an incorrect mailing 

address. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brian O’Hanlon, 202–482–3492. 

Correction 

In the Federal Register of November 

17, 2010, in FR Doc. 75–70214 on page 

70214 in the second column, correct the 

e-mail listed under ‘‘FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT’’ header to read: 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brian O’Hanlon, Office of Energy and 

Environmental Industries, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce at (202) 482–3492; e-mail: 

brian.ohanlon@trade.gov. This meeting 

is physically accessible to people with 

disabilities. Requests for sign language 

interpretation or other auxiliary aids 

should be directed to OEEI at (202) 482– 

5225. 

Correction 

In the Federal Register of November 

17, 2010, in FR Doc. 75–70214 on page 

70214 in the third column, correct the 

address ‘‘Public Participation’’ to read: 

Public Participation: The meeting is 

open to the public and the room is 

disabled-accessible. Public seating is 

limited and available on a first-come, 

first-served basis. Members of the public 

wishing to attend the meeting must 

notify Brian O’Hanlon at the contact 

information above by 5 p.m. EST on 

Thursday, December 2, in order to preregister for clearance into the building. 

Please specify any requests for 

reasonable accommodation at least five 

business days in advance of the 

meeting. Last minute requests will be 

accepted, but may be impossible to fill. 

A limited amount of time, from 3 p.m.– 

3:30 p.m., will be available for pertinent 

brief oral comments from members of 

the public attending the meeting. 

Any member of the public may 

submit pertinent written comments 

concerning the RE&EEAC’s affairs at any 

time before or after the meeting. 

Comments may be submitted to the 

Renewable Energy and Energy 

Efficiency Advisory Committee, C/O: 

Brian O’Hanlon, Office of Energy and 

Environmental Technologies, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, Mail Stop: 

4053, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230. To be 

considered during the meeting, written 

comments must be received no later 

than 5 p.m. EST on Thursday, December 

2, 2010, to ensure transmission to the 

Committee prior to the meeting. 

Comments received after that date will 

be distributed to the members but may 

not be considered at the meeting. 

Edward A. O’Malley, 

Director, Office of Energy and Environmental 

Industries. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29882 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–894] 

Certain Tissue Paper Products From 

the People’s Republic of China: Notice 

of Partial Rescission and Extension of 

Time Limit for Preliminary Results of 

2009–2010 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (the Department) is 

rescinding in part the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain tissue paper products from 

the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for 

the period of review (POR) of March 1, 

2009, to February 28, 2010, with respect 

to Max Fortune Industrial Limited (Max 

Fortune Industrial), Max Fortune (FZ) 

Paper Products Co., Ltd. (formerly 

known as Max Fortune (FETDE) Paper 

Products Co., Ltd.) (Max Fortune 

Fuzhou), and Fujian Provincial Shaowu 

City Huaguang Special Craft Co., Ltd. 

(Huaguang Special Craft). This partial 

rescission is based on the timely 

withdrawal of the requests for review by 

the only interested parties that 

requested the review of these 

companies. The Department is also fully 

extending the time limit for completion 

of the preliminary results of this 

administrative review with respect to 

Max Fortune (Vietnam) Paper Products 

Company Limited (Max Fortune 

Vietnam) to no later than March 31, 

2011. 

DATES: Effective Date: November 29, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brian Smith or Gemal Brangman, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–1766 or (202) 482– 

3773, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 1, 2010, the Department 

published a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

tissue paper products from the PRC. See 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity to Request 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 9162 

(March 1, 2010). In response, on March 

31, 2010, the petitioner 1 timely 

requested an administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

tissue paper products from the PRC for 

entries of the subject merchandise 

during the POR, from Max Fortune 

Industrial, Max Fortune Fuzhou, and 

Max Fortune Vietnam (i.e., exporters of 

the subject merchandise). Similarly, in a 

letter dated March 31, 2010, Huaguang 

Special Craft (i.e., an exporter of the 

subject merchandise) submitted a timely 

request for an administrative review of 

its entries of the subject merchandise 

during the POR. Therefore, on April 19, 

2010, the Department initiated a review 

of Max Fortune Industrial, Max Fortune 

Fuzhou, Max Fortune Vietnam, and 

Huaguang Special Craft. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Request for 

Revocation in Part, 75 FR 22107 (April 

27, 2010). 

In a letter dated July 6, 2010, 

Huaguang Special Craft informed the 

Department that it had withdrawn from 

this review and would no longer be 

participating in this segment of the 

proceeding. In a letter dated July 26, 

2010, the petitioner withdrew its 

request for review of Max Fortune 

Industrial and Max Fortune Fuzhou, 

and requested that the Department 

rescind the review with respect to these 

companies. No other parties requested a 

review of Max Fortune Industrial, Max 

Fortune Fuzhou, or Huaguang Special 

Craft. The request for review of Max 

Fortune Vietnam was not withdrawn, 

and therefore, this administrative 

review will continue with respect to 

that company to examine its claim that 

it did not use PRC jumbo rolls or sheets 

of tissue paper in its shipments of tissue 

paper to the United States during the 

period of review. Max Fortune Vietnam 

is also a respondent in an ongoing 

anticircumvention inquiry and the 

Department intends to conduct 

verification of the above-mentioned 

claim in the context of that segment (see 

discussion below). 

On March 29, 2010, the Department 

also initiated a circumvention inquiry 

on certain imports of tissue paper from 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES