alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2



I, Fernando Fussa, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp. (the registrant);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

[Paragraph omitted pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934]

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2008

| |        |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | By:    | /s/ FERNANDO FUSSA     
| | Name:  | Fernando Fussa         
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. *Leonard*Threadgill, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered May 14, 1965, convicting defendant of burglary and attempted rape, both in the first degree, and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. No questions of fact have been considered. In our opinion, the court below should have instructed the jury as to the corroboration required by law in the event it should find that an actual rape had been committed. Assuming the jury did conclude that there was a consummated rape —■ and the complainant’s story was equally susceptible of such an interpretation— it might have found a lack of the necessary corroboration to sustain a guilty verdict *(People*v. *English,*16 N Y 2d 719). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Docket No: FAA-2015-2464 Dir ID: 2014-NM-195-AD
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7212

DAVID JAMES BARROW,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-00-637-2, CA-00-771-2)

Submitted: November 14, 2001 Decided: December 12, 2001

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David James Barrow, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

David James Barrow seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Barrow v. Angelone, Nos. CA-00-637-2; CA00-771-2 (E.D. Va. June 20, 2001). We also deny Barrow’s motion to

strike the affidavit of Henry Allen Thompson, Sr. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JASON TUCKER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20cv124-MW/GRJ

MICHAEL E. HOROWITZ,

et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 3. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “This case is DISMISSED sua 

sponte as malicious without leave to amend.” The Clerk shall also close the file.

SO ORDERED on July 6, 2020. 

s/ MARK E. WALKER

Chief United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00124-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/06/20 Page 1 of 1
#### The State ex rel. Cook, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Cook v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 119.]

(No. 96-2820

Submitted July 15, 1998

Decided September 16, 1998.)

*William D. Snyder & Associates*and *John Lesko,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *William D. Haders,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

*120The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and grant relief consistent with *State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm,*(1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Douglas, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report of Linn Energy, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kolja Rockov,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 15, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Kolja Rockov                                     |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   | Kolja Rockov                                         |
|                  |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
§ 400.683 Period of ineligibility. ( a ) The beginning of the period of ineligibility will be: ( 1 ) For ineligibility as a result of a delinquent debt, beginning on the date stated in the applicable policy;
( 2 ) For ineligibility as a result of a conviction under Federal or State law of: ( i ) Planting, cultivating, growing, producing, harvesting, or storing a controlled substance, the beginning of the crop year in which the individual is convicted; or
( ii ) Possession of or trafficking in a controlled substance, the beginning of the crop year in which the individual is convicted, unless determined otherwise by the court.
( 3 ) For ineligibility as a result of a disqualification, debarment, or suspension under 515(h) of the Act, 2 CFR part 180, 2 CFR part 417, the date the person was disqualified, debarred, or suspended by debarring official, Administrative Law Judge, or such other person authorized to take such action; and
( 4 ) For debarment under 7 U.S.C. 2209j, the beginning of the crop year in which the person is convicted.
( b ) The duration of the period of ineligibility will be: ( 1 ) For ineligibility as a result of a delinquent debt, until the debt has been paid in full discharged in bankruptcy, or the person has executed a written payment agreement.
( 2 ) For ineligibility as a result of a conviction under Federal or State law of: ( i ) Planting, cultivating, growing, producing, harvesting, or storing a controlled substance, four crop years succeeding the crop year in which the person was convicted; and
( ii ) Possession of a controlled substance or trafficking in a controlled substance, in addition to the time of ineligibility imposed in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, until the period of time imposed by a court has expired.
( 3 ) For ineligibility as a result of a disqualification, debarment, or suspension under section 515(h) of the Act, or 2 CFR part 180 and 2 CFR part 417 until the period of time of disqualification, debarment, or suspension, as applicable, has expired.
( 4 ) For ineligibility as a result of not being a United States citizen, United States non-citizen national, or a qualified alien, until the date such individual becomes a United States citizen, United States non-citizen national, or a qualified alien.
( 5 ) For ineligibility as a result of a conviction falling under 7 U.S.C. 2209j, permanent unless otherwise determined by the Secretary of Agriculture for a period of not less than 10 years.
[Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Jacob , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2018-Ohio-2467.]

O HIO S TATE B AR A SSOCIATION v . J ACOB . [Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Jacob , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2018-Ohio-2467.] (No. 2016-1488

— Submitted June 22, 2018

— Decided June 26, 2018.)
O N A PPLICATION FOR R EINSTATEMENT

.

____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further c onsideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Harry Joseph Jacob III, Attorney Registration No. 0008620, last know n address in Solon, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consid er its order of May 10, 2017, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years, with the second year stayed on
the condition that he commit no further mis conduct, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this cour t that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Jacob , 150 Ohio St.3d 162, 2017-Ohio-2733, 80 N.E.3d 440.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and O’D ONNELL , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , F ISCHER , D E W INE , and D E G ENARO , JJ., concur.

________________________
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
ss.1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Datascension Inc. (the "Company")on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report")"Report"), I,
Lou Persico, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Lou PersicoLOU
      PERSICO
                CEO
      and Prin. Executive Officer





Dated:
April 10, 2009
9.104-2 Special standards.

(a) When it is necessary for a particular acquisition or class of acquisitions, the contracting officer

shall develop, with the assistance of appropriate specialists, special standards of responsibility.

Special standards may be particularly desirable when experience has demonstrated that unusual

expertise or specialized facilities are needed for adequate contract performance. The special

standards shall be set forth in the solicitation (and so identified) and shall apply to all offerors.

(b) Contracting officers shall award contracts for subsistence only to those prospective contractors

that meet the general standards in 9.104-1 and are approved in accordance with agency sanitation

standards and procedures.

Parent topic: 9.104 Standards.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
 CERTIFICATION OF W. RANDALL FOWLER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF EPE HOLDINGS, LLC, THE GENERAL PARTNER OF
ENTERPRISE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 /s/ W. Randall FowlerName: W. Randall FowlerName:
    
    W. Randall FowlerTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer of EPE Holdings, LLCon behalf of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.Date:
    
    August 9, 2007
§ 3560.662 Restrictive-use provisions and agreements. All restrictions require Agency approval and must be in accordance with the following restrictions: ( a ) The undersigned, and any successors in interest, agree to use the property (described herein) in compliance with 42 U.S.C. 1484 or 1485, whichever is applicable, and applicable regulations and the subsequent amendments, for the purpose of housing: ( 1 ) Very low-, or low-income households when required by § 3560.658(a)(2), or
( 2 ) Very low-, low-, or moderate-income households.
( b ) The period of the restriction will be inserted in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) 10 years if required by § 3560.658(a)(1);
( 2 ) The last existing tenant (that occupied the property on the date of prepayment) voluntarily vacates if required by § 3560.658(b)(3);
( 3 ) 30 years if required by § 3560.406(g);
( 4 ) Remaining period of existing restrictive-use provisions and any agreed extension if required by § 3560.655 or § 3560.658 (b)(1);
( 5 ) The remaining useful life of the housing and related facilities if required by § 3560.658(a)(2); and
( 6 ) 20 years in all other cases.
( c ) When required by § 3560.658(a)(1) or (a)(2), the undersigned agrees that at the end of the expiration of the period described in paragraph (b) of this section, the property will be offered for sale to a qualified nonprofit organization or public body, in accordance with previously cited statutes and regulations.
( d ) The Agency and eligible tenants or applicants may enforce these restrictions.
( e ) The undersigned also agrees to: ( 1 ) To set rents, other charges, and conditions of occupancy in a manner to meet these restrictions;
( 2 ) To post an Agency approved notice of this restriction for the tenants of the property;
( 3 ) To adhere to applicable local, state, and Federal laws; and
( 4 ) To obtain Agency concurrence for any rental procedures that deviate from those approved at the time of prepayment, prior to implementation.
( f ) The undersigned will be released from these obligations before the termination period in paragraph (b) of this section only when the Agency determines that there is no longer a need for the housing or that financial assistance provided the residents of the housing will no longer be provided due to no fault, action or lack of action on the part of the borrower.
[69 FR 69106, Nov. 26, 2004, as amended at 73 FR 65506, Nov. 4, 2008]
ctlI<nl Rf.l'lCES

r4910-13-Pj ~f~':':~~"'I0'·

DEPARTMENT OF TR4.NSPORTA nON

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

file;

[Docket No. FAA-2009)****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-116-AD)

RtN 2120-AA64

''''irIN(i ~\·M"O~

ANf'.-171

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2CIO (Regional Jet Series 700,

701 & 702), CL-GOO-2DI5 (Regional Jet Series 705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet

Series 900) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products

listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This proposed AD results from

mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnatioll (MeAl) originated by an aviation

authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation

product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

During testing, it was discovered that when the outflow valve (OFY)

manual mode connector is not COlll1ccted,the manual mode motor and

altitude limitation are not properly tested. Consequently, a disconnect of

the OFV manual mode and/or a related wiring failure could potentially

result in a dormant loss of several CPC [cabin pressure control]

backup/safety functions, including OFV manual control, altitude

limitation, emergency depressurization and smoke clearance. *' *' *'

Il<)UnNG SYMlIO,.

ANE·171

L'C/~

""" -

I ,ft-~;'1

"""nNG SYM"O~

- 11'/

r~A"rnlr:'11 ,j /

"'~/1~0'1

-11>0

'~IllAl..SiS'~

~,l

* * * * * * * ".,,"

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition

described in the MeAl.
§ 3201.80 Electronic components cleaners. ( a ) *Definition.* Products that are designed to wash or remove dirt or extraneous matter from electronic parts, devices, circuits, or systems.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 91 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than April 4, 2013, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased electronic components cleaners. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased electronic components cleaners.
[77 FR 20289, Apr. 4, 2012]
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2527 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide veterans 

with counseling and treatment for sexual trauma that 

occurred during inactive duty training. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2527 EH

1 SECTION 1. COUNSELING AND TREATMENT FOR SEXUAL 

2 TRAUMA OCCURRING DURING INACTIVE 

3 DUTY FOR TRAINING. 

4 Section 1720D of title 38, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘active 

7 duty or active duty for training’’ and inserting ‘‘ac8 tive duty, active duty for training, or inactive duty 

9 training’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (f)— 

11 (A) by striking ‘‘this section, the’’ and in12 serting the following: ‘‘this section: 

13 ‘‘(1) The’’; and 

14 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

15 paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(2) The term ‘veteran’, with respect to inactive duty 

17 training described in subsection (a)(1), also includes an 

18 individual who— 

19 ‘‘(A) is not otherwise eligible for the benefits of 

20 this chapter; and 
3 

•HR 2527 EH

1 ‘‘(B) while serving in the reserve components of 

2 the Armed Forces, performed such inactive duty 

3 training but did not serve on active duty.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 28, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2527 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide 

training. ual trauma that occurred during inactive duty veterans with counseling and treatment for sex-
#### § 35.14 Notice.

If the Secretary is considering withholding the issuance of certificates under the Act for a period of not exceeding 90 days to any person who ships, or offers for shipment, any variety of vinifera species table grapes to any foreign destination in violation of any provisions of the Act or this part, he shall cause notice to be given to the person accused of the nature of the charges against him and of the specific instances in which violation of the Act or the regulations in this part is charged.

[41 FR 32878, Aug. 6, 1976]
§ 3555.204 Security requirements. Rural Development will only guarantee loans that are adequately secured. A loan will be considered adequately secured only when all of the following requirements are met: ( a ) *Recorded security document.* The lender obtains at closing, a mortgage on all required ownership and leasehold interests in the security property and ensures that the loan is properly closed.
( b ) *Prior liens.* No liens prior to the guaranteed mortgage exist except in conjunction with a supplemental loan for transfer and assumption. The guaranteed loan must have first lien position at closing. Junior liens by other parties are permitted as long as the junior liens do not adversely affect repayment ability or the security for the guaranteed loan.
( c ) *Adequate security.* Existing and proposed property improvements are completely on the site and do not encroach on adjoining property.
( d ) *Collateral.* All collateral secures the entire loan.
#### §§ 3560.710-3560.749 [Reserved]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 20, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 20, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24D0320. IN THE INTEREST OF S. S. S. et al., CHILDREN (MOTHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 23JV00068 23JV69