alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 3407
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3407 appear at 76 FR 4810, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3407.11 Preparation of environmental impact statements. ( a ) *Actions involving more than one agency.* If more than one Federal agency participates in a program activity, a lead agency shall be selected in accordance with 40 CFR 1501.5(c). The lead agency, in full cooperation with all participating agencies, shall assume responsibility for involving the public as required in 40 CFR 1501.4(b) and shall prepare the EIS or shall cause the EIS to be prepared as provided in 40 CFR 1501.5.
( b ) *Notice of intent.* If a responsible NIFA official designated in § 3407.4(b) of this part recommends the preparation of an EIS, the public shall be apprised of the decision. This notice shall be prepared according to 40 CFR 1508.2.
( c ) *Draft and Final EIS.* The process of preparing the draft and final EIS, as well as the format of the document, shall comply with the provisions of 40 CFR parts 1502-1506.
( d ) *Supplemental statements.* Where substantial changes occur or new information becomes available under a project or activity for which an EIS or draft EIS has been prepared and it is determined by a responsible NIFA official specified in § 3407.4(b) that the changes are pertinent to environmental concerns, a supplement to the EIS or draft EIS may be required. The supplement shall be evaluated and processed in accordance with 40 CFR 1502.9(c).
( e ) *Decisionmaking and implementation.* A responsible NIFA official designated in § 3407.4(b) may make a decision no sooner than thirty days after the notice of availability of the final EIS has been published in the Federal Register by the Environmental Protection Agency (40 CFR 1506.10). The decision will be documented in a record of decision as required by 40 CFR 1505.2, and monitoring and mitigation activities will be implemented as required by 40 CFR 1505.3.
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130221.eng.txt[3/4/2013 11:56:22 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0221

Focus Ready Draft 2/4/2013

ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ REC

PV (kg/yr): 1,000 Import Only

SUBMITTER: 

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: MSDS provided written in German.

Respirator:

Health Effects:

TLV/PEL:
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130221.eng.txt[3/4/2013 11:56:22 AM]

SAT (concerns) (01/25/2013):

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P1B1T2 .

Health: 2 Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 6.00 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 0-1

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

No Pollution Prevention information provided by the

submitter.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0221

Processing: 
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130221.eng.txt[3/4/2013 11:56:22 AM]
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130221.eng.txt[3/4/2013 11:56:22 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0221

Use: 
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130221.eng.txt[3/4/2013 11:56:22 AM]
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130221.eng.txt[3/4/2013 11:56:22 AM]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2241 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2241

               For the relief of Carmen Shahrzad Kulcsar.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 2006

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Carmen Shahrzad Kulcsar.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law or any order, for 
purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et 
seq.), Carmen Shahrzad Kulcsar shall be deemed to have been lawfully 
admitted to the United States for permanent residence as of the date of 
enactment of this Act upon the payment of the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Carmen Shahrzad Kulcsar 
under section 1, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by 1 the total number of immigrant visas available 
during the current fiscal year to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 02-4782

KEVIN LEE MILLER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham.

William L. Osteen, District Judge.

(CR-02-89, CR-02-90, CR-02-91, CR-02-92,

CR-02-93, CR-02-94, CR-02-95, CR-02-96, CR-02-97)

Submitted: April 24, 2003

Decided: May 2, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, William S. Trivette,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Paul A.

Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Winston-Salem, North

Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Kevin Miller appeals his 142-month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to eight counts of bank robbery

and attempted bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)

(2000). Counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Additionally, Miller has filed a pro se

supplemental brief. Finding no reversible error, we affirm. 

In counsel’s Anders brief, Miller contends the district court erred

in including three prior allegedly uncounseled convictions in determining his criminal history level. In assessing challenges to a sentencing court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines, we review

factual determinations for clear error and legal issues de novo. United

States v. Singh, 54 F.3d 1182, 1190 (4th Cir. 1995). The district court,

based on Miller’s own testimony at his sentencing hearing, found

Miller waived his right to counsel in each of the contested convictions. We find no error in this determination. 

We have reviewed the additional arguments and issues raised by

Miller in his pro se supplemental brief and find them to be without

merit. Pursuant to Anders, we have reviewed the record and find no

error. Accordingly, we affirm Miller’s conviction and sentence. This

court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right

to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review.

If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes such

a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for

leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state

that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. MILLER
#### §§ 3550.75-3550.99 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 31.2



I, Michael J. Castellano, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 of Lazard Group LLC (the
Registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;



(b) [Reserved]



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 11, 2006



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|/s/    Michael J. Castellano                 
|Michael J. Castellano Chief Financial
Officer
Unassociated Document


    

     

    
      215 N.
Pine St.

      P. O. Box
3508

      Spartanburg,
SC  29304

       (864)
948-9001

    

     

     

     

    April 30,
2009

    


    


    Mr.
Linwood Gill

    Vice
President

    Federal
Reserve Bank of Richmond

    P.O. Box
27622

    Richmond,
VA 23261

    


    Dear Mr.
Gill:

    


    Our subsidiary bank, First National
Bank of the South, executed a consent order with its primary regulator, the OCC,
on April 27, 2009.  Included in this consent order is an article that
does not allow the bank to be classified as “well-capitalized,” regardless of
its capital levels while the bank is subject to the terms of the
order.  As a result, we understand that we are not in compliance with
the requirements to maintain our status as a financial holding
company.  Therefore, we are writing you this letter to decertify First
National Bancshares as a financial holding company.

    


    The
nonbanking activities that we are involved in are limited to ownership of common
securities of our three statutory trust subsidiaries, FNSC Capital Trust I, FNSC
Statutory Trust II and FNSC Statutory Trust III.  It is our
understanding that our participation in these Trusts is permissible for a bank
holding company and that no changes to our role in these Trusts will be required
as a result of our request to decertify.  We also understand that our
ownership of other debt and equity securities is permissible as a bank holding
company and that no changes to this ownership will be required.

    


    Please do not hesitate to contact me
should you require additional information with regard to our decertification
request.  Please confirm your receipt of this request by signing this
letter below and returning in the enclosed envelope.

    


    Sincerely,

    


            /s/ Jerry
L. Calvert_________

    Jerry L. Calvert

    President and Chief Executive
Officer

    First National Bancshares

    


    Received
by:

    


    


    _________________________

    Name

    


    _________________________

    Date
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. Case Nos.: 3:97cr6/RV/CJK

 3:17cv354/RV/CJK

SHERWIN D. KNIGHT,

Defendant. 

______________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Defendant

commenced this action by filing a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (ECF No. 515). By order of this court dated May 30, 2017,

Defendant had twenty-eight (28) days to file an amended § 2255 motion on the proper

court form or file a notice of voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 516). Defendant did not

file anything in response to the order. Therefore, on July 26, 2017, the court issued

an order requiring Defendant to show cause, within twenty-one (21) days, why this

action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court. (ECF

No. 517). The time for compliance with the show cause order has now elapsed, and

Case Nos.: 3:97cr6/RV/CJK: 3:17cv354/RV/CJK
Page 2 of 2

Defendant has failed to file an amended § 2255 motion or a notice of voluntary

dismissal.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Defendant’s failure to

comply with an order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 24th day of August, 2017.

/s/ Charles J. Kahn, Jr. 

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed

within fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different

deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use

only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the

magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a magistrate

judge's findings or recommendations contained in a report and recommendation

in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to

challenge on appeal the district court's order based on unobjected-to factual and

legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Case Nos.: 3:97cr6/RV/CJK: 3:17cv354/RV/CJK
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Investors Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 10, 2007
    /s/ Domenick A. CamaDomenick A. CamaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 37
§ 400.685 Criteria for regaining eligibility. After the period of ineligibility as specified in § 400.683 has ended, the ineligible person is eligible to participate in programs authorized under the Act, provided the person meets all eligibility requirements. ( a ) After a person regains eligibility for crop insurance when their policy was terminated or voided, the person must submit a new application for crop insurance coverage on or before the applicable sales closing date to obtain insurance coverage for the crop. If the date of regaining eligibility occurs after the applicable sales closing date for the crop, the person may not participate until the following year unless that crop policy allows for applications to be accepted after the sales closing date.
( b ) If a person who was determined ineligible according to this subpart is subsequently determined to be an eligible person for crop insurance through reinstatement, mediation, arbitration, appeal, or judicial review, such person's policies will be reinstated effective at the beginning of the crop year for which the producer was determined ineligible, and such person will be entitled to all applicable benefits under such policies, provided the person meets all eligibility requirements and complies with the terms of the policy.
[79 FR 2079, Jan. 13, 2014, as amended at 79 FR 37161, July 1, 2014]
EX-10.1






EXHIBIT 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

THE GEON COMPANY

SECTION 401(a)(17) BENEFIT RESTORATION PLAN

(December 31, 2007 Restatement)




          PolyOne Corporation hereby adopts this First Amendment to The Geon Company Section 401(a)(17)
Benefit Restoration Plan (December 31, 2007 Restatement) (the “Plan”) effective March 20, 2009.
Words and phrases used herein with initial capital letters that are defined in the Plan are used
herein as so defined.




I.




          The Preamble to the Plan is hereby amended by the addition of the following new paragraph at
the end thereof:





“Effective as of the close of business on March 20, 2009, all Supplemental Restoration
Benefits and Supplemental Preretirement Surviving Spouse Death Benefits under the Plan are
permanently frozen.”



II.




          Section 3.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by the addition of the following new subsection (d)
at the end thereof:





“(d) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 3.1 or any other provision of
the Plan to the contrary, all Supplemental Restoration Benefits and Supplemental
Preretirement Surviving Spouse Death Benefits under the Plan are permanently frozen
effective as of the close of business on March 20, 2009. In furtherance of, but without
limiting the foregoing, a Participant shall not receive credit under this Plan for any
eligible earnings that are paid on or after March 20, 2009.”



 









 







EXECUTED as of the 15th day of January, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	POLYONE CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Gordon D. Harnett 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chair, Compensation and
Governance Committee 	 




2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Revis L. Stephenson, III

Revis L. Stephenson, III, Chairman and Principal
Executive OfficerDated: May 15, 2006