alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2021398EN.01005101.xml

| 11.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 398/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 398/51

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1372 of 17 August 2021 amending Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the prohibition to feed non-ruminant farmed animals, other than fur animals, with protein derived from animals

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 295 of 18 August 2021
  )

On page 15, Annex, point (5)(a), the replaced Section A in Chapter V of Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001, paragraph 1, points (m) and (n):

for:

| ‘(m) | authorised compound feed establishments producing, in accordance with Chapter IV, Section G, point (b), compound feed containing processed animal protein derived from porcine animals intended for poultry; |
| --- | --- |

‘(m)

authorised compound feed establishments producing, in accordance with Chapter IV, Section G, point (b), compound feed containing processed animal protein derived from porcine animals intended for poultry;

| (n) | authorised compound feed establishments producing, in accordance with Chapter IV, Section H, point (b), compound feed containing processed animal protein derived from poultry intended for porcine animals;’, |
| --- | --- |

(n)

authorised compound feed establishments producing, in accordance with Chapter IV, Section H, point (b), compound feed containing processed animal protein derived from poultry intended for porcine animals;’,

read:

| ‘(m) | authorised compound feed establishments producing, in accordance with Chapter IV, Section G, point (d), compound feed containing processed animal protein derived from porcine animals intended for poultry; |
| --- | --- |

‘(m)

authorised compound feed establishments producing, in accordance with Chapter IV, Section G, point (d), compound feed containing processed animal protein derived from porcine animals intended for poultry;

| (n) | authorised compound feed establishments producing, in accordance with Chapter IV, Section H, point (d), compound feed containing processed animal protein derived from poultry intended for porcine animals;’. |
| --- | --- |

(n)

authorised compound feed establishments producing, in accordance with Chapter IV, Section H, point (d), compound feed containing processed animal protein derived from poultry intended for porcine animals;’.

---
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document




































 



 
 

  EXHIBIT 10.34    
    


 
    Cellu Tissue Holdings Inc.
  Corporate Bonus Plan
  Fiscal 2009    
    



        Background Principal: To eliminate the previous history of cliff bonus programs and institute a plan that pays out a "sliding scale"
once Adjusted EBITDA surpasses prior year results. Maximum Payout (as defined by employee)is achieved at budget EBITDA of $60MM. 



									
	 	Fiscal 2009 Adj.

EBITDA $(MM) 	 	% of Target

Payout 	 	 
	 
	 	 55.89
	 	 	50	%	 	 	 
	 	 56.40
	 	 	56	%	 	 	 
	 	 56.92
	 	 	63	%	 	 	 
	 	 57.43
	 	 	69	%	 	 	 
	 	 57.94
	 	 	75	%	 	 	 
	 	 58.46
	 	 	81	%	 	 	 
	 	 58.97
	 	 	88	%	 	 	 
	 	 59.48
	 	 	94	%	 	 	 
	 	 60.00
	 	 	100	%	 	 	 
	 	 60.52
	 	 	106	%	 	 	 
	 	 61.03
	 	 	113	%	 	 	 
	 	 61.54 or greater
	 	 	120	%	 	 	 






 Add'l Background Information:  


        Adjusted EBITDA as defined by the Cellu Tissue Monthly Reporting Package 


        Maxium
payout for Fiscal 2009 is 100%. 











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.34


Cellu Tissue Holdings Inc. Corporate Bonus Plan Fiscal 2009
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:92cr4013-WS

MARLIN DAVIS, 4:05cv411-WS

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.

1671) docketed November 8, 2005. The magistrate judge recommends that the

defendant's renewed motion to reopen his section 2255 proceeding be summarily

dismissed. The defendant has filed objections (doc. 1672) to the report and

recommendation.

Upon review of the record in light of the defendant’s objections, the court has

determined that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 1671) is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

Case 4:92-cr-04013-WS-CAS Document 1673 Filed 12/01/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:92cr4013-WS

2. The defendant’s renewed motion to reopen his section 2255 proceeding (doc.

1666) is hereby summarily DISMISSED as an unauthorized second or successive

motion to vacate.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall close Case No.

4:05cv411-WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this December 1, 2005.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:92-cr-04013-WS-CAS Document 1673 Filed 12/01/05 Page 2 of 2
AFS-11-032-E 

Dec 13 2010 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-9032 

Mr. Jeff Goin 

United States Powered Paragliding Association 

931 West 75th Street 

#137-150, 

Naperville, IL 60565 

Dear Mr. Goin: 

This is in response to your October 16, 2010 letter (FAA-2002-12476) and the letter dated 

November 16, 2010 requesting that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) clarify the 

intent of the exemptions issued to United States Powered Paragliding Association (USPPA) 

and to Aero Sports Connection (ASC). The USPPA exemption (9751A) permits training 

using foot-launched, two-place powered paragliders. The ASC exemption (9785A) permits 

training using foot-launched two-place powered or unpowered paragliders or hang gliders. 

Both the USPPA and ASC exemptions contain virtually the same wording and are intended 

to convey the same meaning. These exemptions permit only the operation of foot-launched 

powered or unpowered paragliders or hang gliders. The use of wheels is not acceptable. The 

addition of wheels, skids, carts, etc., will create a powered parachute or a weight shift control 

(WSC) trike, both of which are subject to FAA certification as aircraft. 

Below you will find specific answers to the questions you forwarded to the FAA for 

clarification: 

1. Is it acceptable that foot launchable powered paraglider that happens to have wheels 

be launched or landed on a tandem instructional flight, using those wheels, under 

either exemption listed above? 

Response – It is not acceptable for a two place foot-launched powered paraglider 

(or hang glider) to use wheels for any launch or landing, solo or under the 

exemptions in question. 
2

2. Is it acceptable that the motor unit has skids or wheels intended to support its own 

weight during launch or landing? The instructor or student are supporting their own 

weight during the launch and landing. 

Response – Any support of the motor unit is acceptable only when static. The 

launch and landings must be solely by foot. 

3. Is there any difference in applicability or meaning of the term “foot-launched” 

between the ASC and USPPA exemptions? 

Response – There is no difference in the applicability or meaning of the term 

“foot-launched.” 

A copy of this clarification will be provided to ASC to ensure standardization. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Publication of the tier 2 tax rates for calendar year 2011 as required by section 3241(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. section 3241). Tier 2 taxes on railroad employees, employers, and employee representatives are one source of funding for benefits under the Railroad Retirement Act.

# DATES:

The tier 2 tax rates for calendar year 2011 apply to compensation paid in calendar year 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathleen Edmondson, CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET1, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, Telephone Number (202) 622-0047 (not a toll-free number).

TIER 2 TAX RATES: The tier 2 tax rate for 2011 under section 3201(b) on employees is 3.9 percent of compensation. The tier 2 tax rate for 2011 under section 3221(b) on employers is 12.1 percent of compensation. The tier 2 tax rate for 2011 under section 3211(b) on employee representatives is 12.1 percent of compensation.

Dated: November 17, 2010.

Nancy Marks,

Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities).

[FR Doc. 2010-29887 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
### Page 1 of 3 Disposition Comments Docket No: 

### FAA
- 2011
- 0259 SNPRM Directorate ID: 

### 2010
-NM
- 196
- AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.
Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA
- IR
- M
- 8040.1C Chapter 9. ISSUE 1: Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If PARTIALLY AGREE , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If NO , we don’t agree because ISSUE 2 : Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If PARTIALLY AGREE , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If NO , we don’t agree because

### Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, do uble - click here

### Page 3 of 3 S ignature Section Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Dolce Ventures Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Carl E. Worboys,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Carl E. Worboys
Carl E. Worboys
President, Dolce Ventures Inc.


Date: July 26, 2005
§ 3430.603 Eligibility. To be eligible to receive an award under this subpart, the recipient shall be a collaborative State, tribal, local, or regionally-based network or partnership of public or private entities, including: ( a ) A State cooperative extension service;
( b ) A Federal, State, or tribal agency;
( c ) A community-based or nongovernmental organization;
( d ) A college or university (including a junior college offering an associate's degree) or foundation maintained by a college or university;
( e ) A private for-profit organization; or
( f ) Any other appropriate partner, as determined by the Secretary.
[74 FR 45970, Sept. 4, 2009, as amended at 81 FR 6415, Feb. 8, 2016]
19.1406 Sole source awards.

(a) A contracting officer shall consider a contract award to a SDVOSB concern on a sole source basis

(see 6.302-5(b)(6)), before considering small business set-asides (see 19.203 and subpart 19.5)

provided none of the exclusions of 19.1404 apply and—

(1) The contracting officer does not have a reasonable expectation that offers would be received

from two or more service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns;

(2) The anticipated award price of the contract, including options, will not exceed-

(i) $7 million for a requirement within the NAICS codes for manufacturing; or

(ii) $4 million for a requirement within any other NAICS code;

(3) The requirement is not currently being performed by an 8(a) participant under the provisions of

subpart 19.8 or has been accepted as a requirement by SBA under subpart 19.8;

(4) The service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern has been determined to be a

responsible contractor with respect to performance; and

(5) Award can be made at a fair and reasonable price.

(b) Effective January 1, 2024, a contracting officer shall only award a sole-source contract to a

concern that—

(1) Is designated in SAM as an SDVOSB concern certified by SBA; or

(2) Has represented that it is an SDVOSB concern in SAM and submitted an application for

certification to SBA on or before December 31, 2023. Pending applications for certification are in the

SBA Veteran Small Business Certification Program database at https://veterans.certify.sba.gov.

(c) The SBA has the right to appeal the contracting officer’s decision not to make an SDVOSB solesource award.

Parent topic: Subpart 19.14 - Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement

Program
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2021450DE.01015801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 16.12.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 450/158 |

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2021/1060 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 24. Juni 2021 mit gemeinsamen Bestimmungen für den Europäischen Fonds für regionale Entwicklung, den Europäischen Sozialfonds Plus, den Kohäsionsfonds, den Fonds für einen gerechten Übergang und den Europäischen Meeres-, Fischerei- und Aquakulturfonds sowie mit Haushaltsvorschriften für diese Fonds und für den Asyl-, Migrations- und Integrationsfonds, den Fonds für die innere Sicherheit und das Instrument für finanzielle Hilfe im Bereich Grenzverwaltung und Visumpolitik

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 231 vom 30. Juni 2021](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2021_231_R_TOC)
)

Seite 422, Anhang V Anlage 4 Fußnote

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „1 | NUTS — gemeinsame Klassifikation der Gebietseinheiten für die Statistik. Die Region ist in der Regel auf Ebene 2 anzugeben. Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1059/2003 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 26. Mai 2003 über die Schaffung einer gemeinsamen Klassifikation der Gebietseinheiten für die Statistik (NUTS) ([ABl. L 154 vom 21.6.2003, S. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2003_154_R_TOC)), geändert durch Verordnung (EU) 2016/2066 der Kommission vom 21. November 2016 zur Änderung der Anhänge der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1059/2003 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über die Schaffung einer gemeinsamen Klassifikation der Gebietseinheiten für die Statistik (NUTS) ([ABl. L 322 vom 29.11.2016, S. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2016_322_R_TOC)).“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „1 | NUTS — gemeinsame Klassifikation der Gebietseinheiten für die Statistik. Die Region ist in der Regel auf Ebene 2 anzugeben. Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1059/2003 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 26. Mai 2003 über die Schaffung einer gemeinsamen Klassifikation der Gebietseinheiten für die Statistik (NUTS) ([ABl. L 154 vom 21.6.2003, S. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2003_154_R_TOC)), geändert durch Verordnung (EU) 2016/2066 der Kommission zur Änderung der Anhänge der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1059/2003 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über die Schaffung einer gemeinsamen Klassifikation der Gebietseinheiten für die Statistik (NUTS) ([ABl. L 322 vom 29.11.2016, S. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2016_322_R_TOC)).“ |

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2474 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2474

       To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Violet 11:1 Dye.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2006

  Mr. DeWine introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Violet 11:1 Dye.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BASIC VIOLET 11:1 DYE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking subheading 
9902.70.03 and inserting in numerical sequence the following new 
heading:

``      9902.32.13       Basic Violet 11:1  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Dye (CAS No.                                                       31/2009
                         73398-89-7)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3204.13.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.500 Lawful operations under the Act.

You must engage only in the activities permitted by the Act and in no other activities.
16.602 Labor-hour contracts.

Description. A labor-hour contract is a variation of the time-and-materials contract, differing only in

that materials are not supplied by the contractor. See 12.207(b),16.601(c), and 16.601(d) for

application and limitations, for time-and-materials contracts that also apply to labor-hour contracts.

See 12.207(b) for the use of labor-hour contracts for certain commercial services.

Parent topic: Subpart 16.6 - Time-and-Materials, Labor-Hour, and Letter Contracts
First Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 COMPENSATION AGREEMENT FOR JACQUELYN J. ORR 

GENERAL COUNSEL, VICE PRESIDENT & SECRETARY 
 This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”), dated as of February 1, 2009 (the “Effective Date”), amends that certain Employment Agreement, dated
August 11, 2008 (“Agreement”), by and between Citadel Broadcasting Corporation (“Employer”) and Jacquelyn J. Orr (“Employee”). 
 In consideration of the mutual obligations, agreements, representations and warranties contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Employer and Employee, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree to modify and amend the Agreement as follows: 
  

	 	1.	It is hereby agreed that commencing on the Effective Date, and continuing for the remainder of the Term of the Agreement, the compensation paid by Employer to Employee set forth in
Section 1 of the Agreement shall be reduced by five percent (5%). Thus, Employee’s annual compensation for the remainder of the Term shall be as follows: 

 Annual Salary: 
  

				
	 February 1, 2009 to May 15, 2009:
	  	$	308,750
		
	 May 16, 2009 to May 15, 2010:
	  	$	332,500

  

	 	2.	Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without modification or waiver and shall remain
binding on both parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 

 

			
	ACCEPTED & AGREED TO:
	
	Citadel Broadcasting Corporation:
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Farid Suleman, CEO
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Jacquelyn J. Orr
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of 155 East Tropicana, LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company and155 East Tropicana Finance Corp., a Nevada corporation (collectively, the “Company”)for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Deborah J. Pierce, asChief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Deborah J. Pierce                                           |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Deborah J. Pierce,   Chief Financial Officer  November 10, 2006 |
|                                                            |

 

The foregoing certifications are beingfurnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and are not being filed as partof the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

1

----
156 So.2d 603

#### Hilton H. WILKINSON v. Zeno HUSSER, Rose Husser and Harvey Husser d/b/a Husser’s Store.

No. 46906.

Oct. 9, 1963.

In re: Rose and Harvey Husser applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 154 So.2d 490.

Writ refused. The judgment is not final.