alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2901.7 Review of denials. ( a ) *Request for review.* ( 1 ) Any person aggrieved or adversely affected by a denial of a request for any interpretation under § 2901.4 may request a review of the denial by the Secretary, within 30 days from the date of the denial.
( 2 ) Any person aggrieved or adversely affected by a denial of a request for a modification or rescission under § 2901.5, may request a review of the denial by the Secretary within 30 days from the date of the denial.
( 3 ) Any person aggrieved or adversely affected by a denial of a request for an exception or an exemption under § 2901.6, may request a review of the denial by the Secretary within 30 days from the date of the denial.
( b ) *Procedures.* Any request for review under § 2901.7(a) shall be in writing and shall set forth the specific ground upon which the request is based. There is no final agency action for purposes of judicial review under § 2901.8 until that request has been acted upon. If the request for review has not been acted upon within 30 days after it is received, the request shall be deemed to have been denied. That denial shall then constitute final agency action for the purpose of judicial review under § 2901.8.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Belen Ramos, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB (the “Annual Report”) of Dynatem, Inc. (the “Company”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and otherfinancial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report; 

 

4. The Company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Omitted; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Annual Reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Dated:  August 15, 2003
#### § 3570.274 Fund disbursement.

The Agency will make payments under this agreement in accordance with 2 CFR 200.305. All requests for advances or reimbursements must be in compliance with 2 CFR 200.306 and include any required matching fund usage.
# United States Court of Appeals **For the First Circuit**

Nos. 00-1461 00-1491 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v. PEDRO LUIS TEJADA, Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA The opinion of the court published on June 27, 2001, is amended as follows: One page 7, on the second line following the block quote, insert after "We acknowledge" the words "counsel’s argument."Possible dates for lunch with
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




Memo




	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	April 24, 2009
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	To:

	 	Eric Ceyrolle	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	From:

	 	Dick Morin	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	RE:

	 	Separation from Cognex	 	 





The following summarizes our agreement regarding the compensation and related benefits to be paid
to you in connection with your separation from Cognex Corporation and its affiliate, Cognex
International, Inc. The payment of such amounts shall be made in accordance with applicable French
and U.S. law and in such manner as we may otherwise agree.





	 	•	 	You will receive your gross monthly salary (28,800 Euros) through July 15, 2009 (the
“Termination Date”) and on the usual payment dates.
	 
	 	•	 	You will receive payment of any outstanding vacation days accrued but not taken up to
the Termination Date (subject to social contributions).
	 
	 	•	 	You will receive an additional payment of 299,200 Euros on the Termination Date in
settlement of your rights under French law.
	 
	 	•	 	You will be entitled to receive up to a total maximum amount of 15,360 Euros to cover
(upon presentation of related receipts) reasonable and customary costs incurred by you to
prepare your tax documents for 2009.
	 
	 	•	 	Cognex will pay to your current French “mutuelle” health insurance the greater of (a)
the employer and employee contributions due until the end of 2009 and (b) the amount
required of us by French law.
	 
	 	•	 	You will be entitled to the reimbursement of customary professional expenses incurred
by you prior to the Termination Date in accordance with our policies and procedures.
#### § 3570.76 Planning, bidding, contracting, and construction.

Planning, bidding, contracting, and construction will be handled in accordance with 7 CFR 1942.9, 1942.18, and 1942.126.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joseph Carapazza, Respondent, v Owens Trucking Co., et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 15, 1978, which discharged the Special Funds Conservation Committee from liability. The claimant sustained a permanent partial disability as the result of a compensable myocardial infarction on October 17, 1973. The insurance carrier sought to be reimbursed for liability after 104 weeks of disability, pursuant to the provisions of section 15 (subd 8, par [d]) of the Workers’ Compensation Law, on the ground that the claimant had a *prior*"permanent physical impairment” which resulted "in a permanent disability caused by both conditions that is materially and substantially greater than that which would have resulted from the subsequent injury * * * alone”. (Workers’ Compensation Law, § 15, subd 8, par [d].) The board found: "Upon review, the majority of the Board Panel finds, based on the testimony of Dr. Lehv, claimant’s ulcer does not materially or substantially affect the degree of the disability caused by the accident of October 17, 1973.” The decision is supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Special Funds Conservation Committee against the employer and its insurance carrier. Sweeney, J. P., Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
#### Rosa Miriam TOLEDO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-70832.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 20, 2007.*

Filed Aug. 24, 2007.

Vargas & Associates, Alhambra, CA, for Petitioner.

District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District *455Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jennifer Levings, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, KLEINFELD and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing petitioner’s appeal as untimely.

The regulations state that a notice of appeal must be filed with the BIA within 30 calendar days of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) oral decision or the mailing of a written decision. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1003.38(b), (c). The IJ’s decision was rendered on October 31, 1996. The Notice of Appeal was filed with the BIA on August 23, 2006. Because petitioner’s notice of appeal was filed nearly ten years past the deadline, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the appeal on that ground. Further, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in declining to extend the filing deadline for the appeal.

Accordingly, respondent’s unopposed motion for summary denial is granted because the questions raised by this petition are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). This petition for review is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# 3.908           [Reserved]       

**Parent topic:**Subpart 3.9 - Whistleblower Protections for Contractor Employees
3.1004 Contract clauses.

(a) Insert the clause at FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, in

solicitations and contracts if the value of the contract is expected to exceed $6 million and the

performance period is 120 days or more.

(b)

(1) Unless the contract is for the acquisition of a commercial product or commercial service or will

be performed entirely outside the United States, insert the clause at 52.203-14, Display of Hotline

Poster(s), if–

(i) The contract exceeds $6 million or a lesser amount established by the agency; and

(ii)

(A) The agency has a fraud hotline poster; or

(B) The contract is funded with disaster assistance funds.

(2) In paragraph (b)(3) of the clause, the contracting officer shall–

(i) Identify the applicable posters; and

(ii) Insert the website link(s) or other contact information for obtaining the agency and/or

Department of Homeland Security poster.

(3) In paragraph (d) of the clause, if the agency has established policies and procedures for display

of the OIG fraud hotline poster at a lesser amount, the contracting officer shall replace " $6 million "

with the lesser amount that the agency has established.

Parent topic: Subpart 3.10 - Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct
#### In the Matter of Peter Marzano, Petitioner, v General Electric Company et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review a determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing a discrimination complaint after preliminary investigation for lack of probable cause. On October 25, 1978, petitioner, then 57 years old, filed a complaint with the State Division of Human Rights in which he charged that General Electric discriminated against him by refusing to hire him because of his age and disability. The regional director of the division wrote on the following day to General Electric and required it to respond to an investigatory inquiry form. On November 14, 1978, a field representative of the division interviewed a representative of General Electric and filed an investigation report. On December 19, 1978, the field representative forwarded to petitioner General Electric’s answers to the allegations of his complaint, and on December 21, 1978 he met with petitioner to discuss his complaint. By determination dated December 22, 1978, the division dismissed the complaint for lack of probable cause to believe that General Electric had engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice against petitioner. The Human Rights Appeal Board affirmed that determination, and this proceeding ensued. Petitioner’s contention that the board failed to consider General Electric’s alleged discrimination against him in August of 1972 must be rejected. Subdivision 5 of section 297 of the Executive Law requires that a complaint must be filed within one year of the alleged unlawful discriminatory practice. Petitioner’s complaint was filed on October 25, 1978 and, therefore, was untimely. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Uniwell Electronic Corporation., on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Luiz Brasil, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended October 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and October 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Uniwell Electronic Corporation.



|                  |     |                                                               | 
|----------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|September 5, 2013 | By: | /s/ Luiz Brasil                                               | 
|                  |     | Luiz Brasil                                                   | 
|                  |     | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer               | 
|                  |     | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit
      31.1


**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      David
      LaDuke, certify that:





1. I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sputnik, Inc.;





2. Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I
      am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
      business issuer and have:





(a) designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) evaluated
      the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) disclosed
      in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
      reporting.





5. I
      have
      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit
      committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing
      the equivalent functions):





(a) all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial information; and




(b) any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
      financial reporting.





Date:
                August 14, 2007
              /s/
                David LaDukeName:David
                LaDukeTitle:President,
                Chief Executive Officer, andTreasurer
# C_2021049EN.01000101.xml

| 12.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/1

---

Joint Declaration of the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament on an instrument to deter and counteract coercive actions by third countries

(2021/C 49/01)

The Commission takes note of the concerns of the Parliament and Member States as to the practices of certain third countries to seek to coerce the Union and/or its Member States to take or withdraw particular policy measures. The Commission shares the view that such practices raise significant concerns. The Commission confirms its intention to further examine a possible instrument, which could be adopted in order to dissuade or offset coercive actions by third countries and which would allow the expeditious adoption of countermeasures triggered by such actions. The Commission intends to continue its assessment and on the basis of that assessment, taking into account all relevant circumstances, adopt a legislative proposal providing for a mechanism allowing to dissuade or offset such actions in a manner consistent with international law. As announced in the Letter of Intent of the President of the Commission to the President of the Parliament and President in office of the Council of 16 September 2020 the Commission shall adopt the proposal in any case no later than the end of 2021, or earlier, should the need arise as a result of coercive action taken by a third country.

The Council and the European Parliament take note of the intention of the Commission to submit a proposal for an instrument to deter and counteract coercive actions by third countries. Both institutions are committed to fulfil their institutional role as co-legislators and to consider the proposal in a timely manner, taking into account the Union’s obligations under public international law and WTO law as well as relevant developments in international trade.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MARK VII, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 29, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1996
<CASH>                                             409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,607
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,152
<PP&E>                                           8,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,436
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,822
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           489
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,988
<SALES>                                        264,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               264,785
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  260,176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   173
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   384
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,436
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,863
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,573
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,573
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
        

</TABLE>
----

 Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Amalgamated Pictures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Amended Report"), I, Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Amended Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: September 24, 2008

| /s/ Avery Pack                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| Avery Pack, President and            Chief Executive Officer            (Principal Executive Officer) and            Acting Chief Financial Officer            (Principal Financial Officer and            Principal Accounting Officer) |