alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nova Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alexander Craven, the Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 19, 2007

 
| By: | /s/  Alexander Craven |  
 

Alexander Craven, President, Chief Executive Officer

 
 

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

  |
|-----|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Arrow Resources Development, Inc. (the Company ) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), I, Peter J. Frugone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, subject to the disclosure of deficiencies in the Company ’ s disclosure controls and procedures set forth in Item 8A of the Report:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





April 15, 2011





/s/ Peter J. FrugonePeter J. FrugoneChief Financial Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2328 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain synthetic filament 

yarns. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2006 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

synthetic filament yarns. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SYNTHETIC FILAMENT YARNS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.90 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain filament yarns) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2328 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
# L_2021420EN.01013201.xml

| 25.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 420/132 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 420/132

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2032 of 19 November 2021 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to support military units trained by the EU Training Mission in Mozambique

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 415 of 22 November 2021
  )

On page 28, Article 6, first sentence:

for:

‘... the High Representative shall provide the PSC with six monthly reports on the implementation of the Assistance Measure ...’,

read:

‘... the High Representative shall provide the PSC with six-monthly reports on the implementation of the Assistance Measure ...’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                           4,259
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,374
<INVENTORY>                                     87,639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,332
<PP&E>                                          63,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 331,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,749
<BONDS>                                        156,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,462
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   331,899
<SALES>                                        362,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               362,954
<CGS>                                          228,358
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,520
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,429
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,091
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,091
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 3560.157 Occupancy rules. ( a ) *General.* The purpose of a borrower's occupancy rules is to outline the basis for the tenant and management relationship. Prior to Agency approval of occupancy rules, borrowers must provide written certification from their attorney that the housing project's occupancy rules are consistent with applicable Federal, state, and local laws, as well as Agency requirements, and the requirements of all programs participating in the housing project. Borrowers must obtain Agency approval of the occupancy rules prior to initial occupancy and obtain Agency approval prior to the implementation date of any subsequent modifications to the rules.
( b ) *Requirements.* The occupancy rules must be in writing and posted for easy tenant access. A copy of these rules must be attached to the tenant's lease upon initial occupancy. At a minimum, the occupancy rules must address: ( 1 ) The tenant's rights and responsibilities under the lease or occupancy agreement;
( 2 ) The rent payment or occupancy charge policies;
( 3 ) The policies regarding periodic inspection of units;
( 4 ) The system for responding to tenant complaints;
( 5 ) The maintenance request and work order procedures;
( 6 ) The housing services and facilities available to tenants or members;
( 7 ) The office locations, hours, and emergency telephone numbers;
( 8 ) The restrictions on storage and prohibitions on non-functional vehicles in the housing project area;
( 9 ) Other requirements related to a subsidy provided to a tenant from non-Agency sources;
( 10 ) When a guest becomes a member of the tenant household; and
( 11 ) The procedures tenants must follow to request reasonable accommodations.
( c ) *Modification of occupancy rules.* The Agency must concur with any modification to the occupancy rules prior to implementation. Proper notice must be given to each tenant at least 30 days in advance of implementation of such rules in accordance with § 3560.160.
( d ) *Federal, state and local requirements.* The occupancy rules must be consistent with Federal, state, and local law.
( e ) *Pets/Assistance Animals.* All housing projects should establish reasonable written pet rules. No rules may be promulgated that would prevent occupancy by a household member who requires a service or assistance animal. In elderly housing, borrowers must not prohibit tenants from keeping domestic animals in their rental units as pets.
( f ) *Tenant organizations.* Borrowers must not infringe on the rights of tenants to organize an association of tenants. Borrowers (or a designated management representative) should be available and willing to work with a tenant organization.
( g ) *Community rooms.* Borrowers may not place unreasonable restrictions on tenants that desire to use a community room.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Investors Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 9, 2006
    
    /s/ Robert M. Cashill

Robert M. CashillPresident and Chief Executive Officer
98-1339.

#### State v. Blanton.

Warren App. No. CA97-12-125. Discretionary appeal allowed on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II only; *sua sponte,*cause held for the decision in 97-1985, *State v. Cook,*Allen App. No. 1-97-21; briefing schedule stayed.
EXHIBIT 1

Case 7:20-cv-00137-MCR-GRJ Document 157-1 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 2
TRX - Trial Exhibit 

Number TRX - Description TRX - Plaintiffs' Objections Served (EHK Trial) TRX - Depo Exhibit Rulings

D-Gen-0099 Regulation: Army Hearing Program 3D Infantry 

Division (Mechanized) Hearing Program, dated 

01/10/2007

FRE 401, 402, 403; MIL G-2 OVERRULED

D-Gen-0127 Email from D. Ohlin to D. Ohlin re Letter for Combat 

Arms Earplug reviewed by B. Myers making few 

corrections re our company, dated 4/9/1999

Hearsay (FRE 802); MIL G3, G7 OVERRULED

D-Gen-0187 Email from J. Capone to B. Myers re Combat Arms 

Earplug, dated 5/1/2004

FRE 802 OVERRULED

D-Gen-0250 Letter from K. Michael to B. Mishkin re Hearing 

Protective Device Test Report number Q2558A 

Revision 0, dated 03/28/2012

Foundation; FRE 403; Hearsay 

(FRE 802); Prior Court Order 

Excluding

OVERRULED

D-Gen-0365 Sail the Sound 29th Annual NHCA Hearing 

Conservation Conference February 19-21, 2004

FRE 802; FRE 803(18) Babeu, Lorraine 05 SUSTAINED

D-Gen-0379 Hearing Loss Prevention Improvements to DOD 

Hearing Conservation Programs Could Lead to 

Better Outcomes, dated January 2011

FRE 802; FRE 803(18) Battler, Leanne (aka 

Cleveland) PX 24

SUSTAINED

D-Gen-1836 General Operations Checklist Comments & 

Deficiencies by R. Peppin, P.E., dated 2/03/1999, 

AERO Company E-A-RCAL Acoustical Lab

FRE 401/402; NVLAP report is 

hearsay

SUSTAINED as to 

auditor comments 

consistent with ECF No. 

1702 (MDL docket) and 

NVLAP Order, see, e.g. , 

ECF No. 141 (Hacker). 

Otherwise 

OVERRULED. 

D-Gen-1885 Email from D. Ohlin to B. Myers, E. Berger re The 

M2STF: Acoustic Protection, Lead Officer SME 

(Unclassified), dated 05/17/2005

FRE 403; FRE 802 Hearsay; MIL 

G5; MIL G7

OVERRULED

Case 7:20-cv-00137-MCR-GRJ Document 157-1 Filed 04/16/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 33.13 Notice.

If the Secretary is considering withholding the issuance of certificates under the Act for a period of not exceeding 90 days to any person who ships, or offers for shipment, apples to any foreign destination in violation of any provisions of the Act or this part, he or she shall cause notice to be given to the person accused of the nature of the charges against him or her and of the specific instances in which violation of the Act or the regulations in this part is charged.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DAMIEN C. LING,

Petitioner,

v. 4:20cv362–WS/HTC

MARK S. INCH,

Respondent.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 15) docketed April 12, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that the

petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) be dismissed as

untimely. The petitioner has filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

Having reviewed the record, this court has determined that the magistrate

judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 15) is

hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.
Page 2 of 2

2. The respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13) is GRANTED.

3. The petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) is

DISMISSED as untimely.

 4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “Petitioner’s petition for writ of

habeas corpus is dismissed.”

5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

6. Leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of May , 2021.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### STEVENS v. McADOO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Lawrence Stevens against William McAdoo.

No opinion. Motion granted. Settle order on notice.
1120 East Diehl Road, Suite 200 | Naperville, IL 60563-1486 | P: 866.730.6735 F: 630.649.6700

www.relmidwest.org

OMB Control Number XXXX-XXXX (Exp XX/XX)

REL Midwest Implementation Study of the Ramp-Up to Readiness Program—1

Extant Document Collection Request

Month XX, 20XX

Dear [SCHOOL STAFF MEMBER]:

REL Midwest at American Institutes for Research (AIR) is studying the Ramp-Up to Readiness program 

at [SCHOOL]. In [MONTH/YEAR], our research team received approval from your school to conduct 

this study. As part of our study, we are collecting existing, publicly available documents related to 

college-readiness programs and initiatives in your school. We are interested in the programs, services, 

activities, and resources that [SCHOOL] offers to help students prepare for college.

The types of documents that we would like to receive are the following:

 Calendars of events related to college readiness (e.g., college fairs, visits from college 

representatives, financial aid night for families)

 Agendas from professional development activities related to college readiness

 Written descriptions of college readiness programs offered in your school (e.g., Upward Bound)

 Written descriptions of activities or services related to college offered in your school

 A description of how [SCHOOL] calculates a student’s cumulative GPA

 Master schedule showing the availability of advanced courses (e.g., honors, advanced placement, 

dual-enrollment courses)

In the recently conducted focus groups, we heard about several college-readiness supports that we would 

like to request more information about. They are:

[LIST RELEVANT PROGRAMS, SERVICES, ACTIVITIES, AND RESOURCES]

Please do not create any original documents to fulfill this request. Documents can be e-mailed to me at [email address]. To meet our analysis and reporting deadlines, we will need to receive the complete 

collection of documents no later than [DATE].

We have found that an initial phone discussion about the requested documents can help prevent 

misunderstandings. That said, we would like to find a 30-minute window of time next week, [DATES], 

when we can discuss this document request. Please let me know of your availability (or the availability of 

someone else who is familiar with the data), and we will arrange a phone conference.

We appreciate your support for this study. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at the phone 

number below.

Best regards,

Jim Lindsay, Ph.D.

Principal Investigator, REL Midwest

630-649-6591
#### § 4279.180 Changes in borrower.

Any changes in borrower ownership or organization prior to the issuance of the Loan Note Guarantee must meet the eligibility requirements of the program and be approved by the Agency.
### MCELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY 

## & CARPENTER, LLP

ALBERT J. PUCCIARELLI Direct dial: (201) 493-3718 apucciarelli@mdmc-law.com
U.S. Department ofTransportation Federal Aviation Administration Docket Management System 1200 New JerseyAve., SE Washington, D.C. 20590 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 40 West Ridgewood Avenue Ridgewood, NJ 07450 (201) 445-6722 FACSIMILE (201) 445-5376

November 20,2015

Re: Amendment to Exemption No. 11311 issued pursuant to Section 333 oftheFAA Reform Act and Part 11 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1055 Dear Sirs/Madams: Next Generation Aviation Services, LLC ("Next Generation") was issued Exemption number 11311 (hereinafterthe "Exemption") using the DJI S1 000+ Premium Unmanned Aircraft System. The Exemption hadbeen amended earlierthis year to include the DJI Inspire 1model T600 quadcopter. At this time, Next Generation respectfullyrequests that the Exemptionbe further amended to permit its use ofan additional unmanned aircraft system ("UAS") platform, specifically, the FreeflyAlta. The Freefly Alta falls within all the operating limitations in our approved Exemption and therefore Next Generation will also beusing the same Operations and SafetyManual submitted as confidential documents under the original approved Exemption. Attached hereto and submitted as a confidential document is the FreeflyAlta User Manual that will be used in conjunction withNext Generation's Operations and Safety Manual to maintain full compliance withthe terms ofthe Exemption. As this is a second amendment to an existing Exemption, it is Next Generation'sposition that good cause for the amendment exists and that notice ofthe requested amendment does not have to bepublished in the Federal Register. All operations ofthe additional UAS will bein full compliance with the terms ofthe Exemption.

AJP:gdm Cc: Frank R. Galella, III

NEW JERSEY NEW YORK PENNSYLVANIA CONNECTICUT MASSACHUSETTS COLORADO DELAWARE
Schedule of Compensation for Non-Employee Directors



 Exhibit 10.23 
  
 Schedule of Cash Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 
  

				
	 Annual Retainer
	  	$	40,000
	 Committee Chairman Annual Retainer:
	  	 	 
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	10,000

  

 1
Case 5:02-cv-00136-MP Document 2 Filed 04/02/02 Page 1 of 4
Case 5:02-cv-00136-MP Document 2 Filed 04/02/02 Page 2 of 4
Case 5:02-cv-00136-MP Document 2 Filed 04/02/02 Page 3 of 4
Case 5:02-cv-00136-MP Document 2 Filed 04/02/02 Page 4 of 4
149 So.2d 764

#### S. P. BEDINGFIELD v. Tiny WATSON et al.

No. 46570.

Feb. 8, 1963.

Writ refused. On the facts found by, the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.
#### §§ 1957.7-1957.50 [Reserved]
# 3.907 Whistleblower Protections Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act).

- 3.907-1 Definitions. 
- 3.907-2 Policy. 
- 3.907-3 Procedures for filing complaints. 
- 3.907-4 Procedures for investigating complaints. 
- 3.907-5 Access to investigative file of Inspector General. 
- 3.907-6 Remedies and enforcement authority. 
- 3.907-7 Contract clause. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 3.9 - Whistleblower Protections for Contractor Employees
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:92-cr-01027-MP-AK

EDGAR ARNOLD GARCIA,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 110, Edgar Arnold Garcia’s Motion for

Reconsideration of this Court’s Order Adopting the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation

and denying Defendant’s Motion to Vacate, Doc. 107. Defendant has also filed an inquiry as to

whether his motion for reconsideration was timely filed pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, Doc. 111. Under Rule 59(e), “[a]ny motion to alter or amend a

judgment shall be filed no later than 10 days after entry of the judgment.” FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e). 

Defendant’s motion was not filed within ten days of entry of the judgment. “The 10-day time

limitation for serving a Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(b) motion is jurisdictional and cannot be extended by the

district court.” Nisson v. Lundy, 975 F.2d 802, 806 (11th Cir. 1992). Therefore, this court is

without jurisdiction to entertain defendant’s motion. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration, Doc. 110, is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of July, 2006

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:92-cr-01027-MP-AK Document 112 Filed 07/20/06 Page 1 of 1
#### § 29.6023 Leaf structure.

The cell development of a leaf as indicated by its porosity. The degrees range from close (slick and tight) to open (porous). (See chart.)
- /app03/pdfs/499cv/002/42/2776t/00103001.tif