alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Title: Radium isotopes as sediment-water interface tracers: Indian River Lagoon, Florida

Author(s): Swarzenski, P.W.

Publishing Organization: U.S. Geological Survey

Publication Series and Number: Open-File Report OF-2000-482

Publication Date: 2000

Map Scale: 1:1,034,000

Cross Section: None

Northernmost Latitude: 29° 0' 0"N (29.0000)

Southernmost Latitude: 28° 0' 0"N (28.0000)

Easternmost Longitude: 80°30' 0"W (-80.5000)

Westernmost Longitude: 81°30' 0"W (-81.5000)

Publication Format: Digital and Paper

Online:

 View the publication from the USGS Publications Warehouse

This Product Is Available, Please note the

publication series and number, and then

contact: U.S. Geological Survey

Postal Address:

USGS Information Services

Box 25286

Denver, CO 80225

Voice Telephone: (303) 202-4700 or 1-888-ASK-USGS

Facsimile Telephone: (303) 202-4693

If any fields in this record

contain errors, please send us

your

Has this record

been

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA

URL http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ngmdb/ngm_catalog.ora.html

Database project personnel.

Last modified: 7-Nov-2011

Product Description Page http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_34774.htm

1 of 1 11/8/2011 4:38 PM
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Linn Energy, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark E. Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date: October 28, 2010

/s/  Mark E. EllisMark E. EllisPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      ss.1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Datascension Inc. (the
      "Company")on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
      "Report")"Report"), I, D. Scott Kincer, Chief Executive Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
      the
      best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                D. Scott KincerDAVID
                  SCOTT KINCER
                CEO
                  and Prin. Accounting OfficerDated:
                March 28, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 3402
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3402 appear at 76 FR 4807, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3402.11 Proposal cover page. The Proposal Cover Page, Form NIFA-2002, must be completed in its entirety, including all authorizing signatures. One copy of each grant application must contain the original pen-and-ink signatures, or approved electronic equivalent, of: ( a ) The Project Director(s); and
( b ) The Authorized Organizational Representative for the institution.
2.201 Contract clause.       Insert the clause at 52.202-1, Definitions, in solicitations and contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2.2 - Definitions Clause
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|             |   |                                        |
|------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
| November 5, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Mark Stevenson                     |
|             |   | Mark Stevenson, Principal Executive Officer |
|             |   |                                        |
| November 5, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Robert Wesolek                          |
|             |   | Robert Wesolek, Principal Financial Officer |
Message Information Date 08/27/2012 02:34 PM From pubIicaccess@supportportaI.com To LisaP Jackson/DC/USEPAIUS@EPA
cc Subject Ticket #23002-358897 Response Sent Message Body
Message to: Shari Clayman Thank you for your inquiry to the EPA Web site. Your request has been received by the Headquarters Public Access Service, a contractor operated reference and referral service. Thank you for your email. We are forwarding your comments to the Office of the Administrator for response. You can also find contact information for the office at:http://www.epa.qov/aboutepa/ao.html. *********************** Public Access Reference Service, operated by ASRC Primus EPA Headquarters Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. (3404T) Washington, DC 20460 Fax: (202) 566-0574 The following Customers have been CC'ed: The following CSR(s) have been CC'ed: jackson.lisapepa.gov Ticket Summary: Ticket #: 23002-358897 Date Created: 8/16/2012 05:25 PM EDT Customer: N/A N/A (tihicke y iowatelecom .net) Summary: ethanol Question: Due to the poor corn crop this year, please suspend the ethanol mandate. Topic: Other
To access the Ticket:

Go to: https://dl 1 .parature.com/Iink/desk/23002/2301 2/Ticket/358897

Powered by ParatureOEX Processing Information Processed Date: 08/27/2012 02:57 PM Processed By Jacqueline Leavy P0 Office Category: OEX CMS Message Count 1
3.906 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.203-17, Contractor Employee Whistleblower

Rights, in all solicitations and contracts, except solicitations and contracts of DoD, NASA, the Coast

Guard, or applicable elements of the intelligence community (see 3.900(a)).

Parent topic: Subpart 3.9 - Whistleblower Protections for Contractor Employees
EXHIBIT 11.

UNITIL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE
OUTSTANDING

(000s except for per share data)

(UNAUDITED)



|                                                               |  |                            |           |                           |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | --------- | ------------------------- | - | --------- |  | ---- | --------- |  | - | ---------
|                                                               |  | Three Months EndedJune 30, |           | Six Months Ended June 30,
|(000s, except per share data)                                 |  | 2006                       |           | 2005                      |   | 2006      |  | 2005
|Net Income                                                     |  | $                          | 1,435     |                           | $ | 1,536     |  | $    | 3,478     |  | $ | 4,246    
|Less: Dividend Requirements on Preferred Stock                 |  |                            | 34        |                           |   | 39        |  |      | 64        |  |   | 78       
|                                                               |  |                            |           |                           |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          
|Net Income Applicable to Common Stock                          |  | $                          | 1,401     |                           | $ | 1,497     |  | $    | 3,414     |  | $ | 4,168    
|                                                               |  |                            |           |                           |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          
|Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding  Basic   |  |                            | 5,592,616 |                           |   | 5,547,269 |  |      | 5,584,935 |  |   | 5,540,196
|Dilutive Effect of Stock Options and Restricted Stock          |  |                            | 13,993    |                           |   | 15,846    |  |      | 14,173    |  |   | 15,194   
|Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding  Diluted |  |                            | 5,606,609 |                           |   | 5,563,115 |  |      | 5,599,108 |  |   | 5,555,390
|Earnings Per Share  Basic                                     |  | $                          | 0.25      |                           | $ | 0.27      |  | $    | 0.61      |  | $ | 0.75     
|Earnings Per Share  Diluted                                   |  | $                          | 0.25      |                           | $ | 0.27      |  | $    | 0.61      |  | $ | 0.75
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 26 Filed 05/03/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 26 Filed 05/03/21 Page 2 of 2
#### Jowell FINLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. GONZALES; et al., DefendantsAppellees.

No. 06-15195.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 13, 2007.*

Filed Aug. 22, 2007.

Jowell Finley, Represa, CA, pro se.

Alvin Gittisriboongul, Attorney General’s Office for the State of California, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*439MEMORANDUM **

Jowell Finley, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants in Finley’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his Eighth Amendment rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment, *Barnett v. Centoni,*31 F.3d 813, 815 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Finley’s failureto-protect claim because Finley did not raise a triable issue as to whether defendants were deliberately indifferent to his safety where defendants twice notified their commanding officer of Finley’s concerns regarding an alleged threat from his cellmate. *See Farmer v. Brennan,*511 U.S. 825, 837-39, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 47638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19203]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice 2014-0036]

Application for Final Commitment for a Long-Term Loan or 
Financial Guarantee in Excess of $100 Million: AP088866XX

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice is to inform the public, in accordance with 
Section 3(c)(10) of the Charter of the Export-Import Bank of the United 
States (``Ex-Im Bank''), that Ex-Im Bank has received an application 
for final commitment for a long-term loan or financial guarantee in 
excess of $100 million (as calculated in accordance with Section 
3(c)(10) of the Charter). Comments received within the comment period 
specified below will be presented to the Ex-Im Bank Board of Directors 
prior to final action on this Transaction.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 8, 2014 to be 
assured of consideration before final consideration of the transaction 
by the Board of Directors of Ex-Im Bank.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted through Regulations.gov at 
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV. To submit a comment, enter EIB-2014-0036 under the 
heading ``Enter Keyword or ID'' and select Search. Follow the 
instructions provided at the Submit a Comment screen. Please include 
your name, company name (if any) and EIB-2014-0036 on any attached 
document.
    Reference: AP088866XX
    Purpose and Use:
    Brief description of the purpose of the transaction:
    To support the export of U.S.-manufactured commercial aircraft to 
Ethiopia.
    Brief non-proprietary description of the anticipated use of the 
items being exported:
    To be used by Ethiopian Airlines for air cargo transport primarily 
between Ethiopia and other countries in Africa, Asia and Europe.
    To the extent that Ex-Im Bank is reasonably aware, the items being 
exported are not expected to produce exports or provide services in 
competition with the exportation of goods or provision of services by a 
United States industry.
    Parties:
    Principal Supplier: The Boeing Company
    Obligor: Ethiopian Airlines
    Guarantor(s): None
    Description Of Items Being Exported: Boeing 777 aircraft
    Information On Decision: Information on the final decision for this 
transaction will be available in the ``Summary Minutes of Meetings of 
Board of Directors'' on http://exim.gov/newsandevents/boardmeetings/board/
    Confidential Information: Please note that this notice does not 
include confidential or proprietary business information; information 
which, if disclosed, would violate the Trade Secrets Act; or 
information which would jeopardize jobs in the United States by 
supplying information that competitors could use to compete with 
companies in the United States.

Lloyd Ellis,
Program Specialist, Export Import Bank.
[FR Doc. 2014-19203 Filed 8-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

DOUGLAS REED, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5451/LAC/EMT 

MIRANDA W. SANTIAGO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER

 The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 

31, 2020 (ECF No. 17). Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 

 1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

17) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 

Case 3:20-cv-05451-LC-EMT Document 21 Filed 10/01/20 Page 1 of 2
Case No.: 3:20cv54551/LAC/EMT 

Page 2 of 2

2. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and § 1915A(b)(1).

3. The clerk of court must enter judgment accordingly and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of October, 2020. 

LACEY A. COLLIER 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier 

Case 3:20-cv-05451-LC-EMT Document 21 Filed 10/01/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 35.13 Minimum quantity.

Any person may, without regard to the provisions of this part, ship or offer for shipment, and any carrier may, without regard to the provisions of this part, transport or receive for transportation to any foreign destination, a shipment of 25 packages or less of vinifera species table grapes, either a single variety or a combination of two or more varieties, not exceeding 1,250 pounds gross weight.

[41 FR 32878, Aug. 6, 1976]
*Wednesday, August 5, 1998*

MOTION DOCKET

96-2624.

#### Hamilton v. Ohio Sav. Bank.

Cuyahoga App. No. 69757. On motion to recover costs. Motion granted only for the filing fee of $40.

Douglas, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent and would grant the motion in full.

Joseph J. Vukovich, J., of the Seventh Appellant District, sitting for F.E. Sweeney, J.
§ 319.56-11 Importation of dried, cured, or processed fruits, vegetables, nuts, and legumes. ( a ) Dried, cured, or processed fruits and vegetables (except frozen fruits and vegetables), including cured figs and dates, raisins, nuts, and dried beans and peas, may be imported without permit, phytosanitary certificate, or other compliance with this subpart, except as specifically provided otherwise in this section or elsewhere in this part.
( b ) *Acorns and chestnuts* — ( 1 ) *From countries other than Canada and Mexico; treatment required.* Acorns and chestnuts intended for purposes other than propagation, except those grown in and shipped from Canada and Mexico, must be imported into the United States under permit, and subject to all the requirements of § 319.56-3, and must be treated in accordance with part 305 of this chapter.[2]
( 2 ) *From Canada and Mexico.* Acorns and chestnuts grown in and shipped from Canada and Mexico for purposes other than propagation may be imported in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( 3 ) *For propagation.* Acorns and chestnuts from any country may be imported for propagation only in accordance with the applicable requirements in §§ 319.37-1 through 319.37-23.
( c ) *Macadamia nuts.* Macadamia nuts in the husk or shell are prohibited importation into the United States unless the macadamia nuts were produced in, and imported from, St. Eustatius.
[72 FR 39501, July 18, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 4252, Jan. 26, 2010; 83 FR 11866, Mar. 19, 2018] Footnotes -
319.56-11
[2] Acorns and chestnuts imported into Guam are subject to the requirements of § 319.56-7(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2363 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2363

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the educational flexibility program under section 4 of the 
             Education Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EDUCATIONAL FLEXIBILITY PROGRAM EXTENSION.

    (a) Extension Authority.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the Secretary of Education is authorized to carry out the 
educational flexibility program under section 4 of the Education 
Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999 (20 U.S.C. 5891b), until the date 
of enactment of an Act that reauthorizes programs under part A of title 
I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311 
et seq.), for any State that was an Ed-Flex Partnership State on 
September 30, 2004.
    (b) Designation.--
            (1) In general.--Any designation of a State as an Ed-Flex 
        Partnership State that was in effect on September 30, 2004, 
        shall be extended until the date of enactment of an Act that 
        reauthorizes programs under part A of title I of the Elementary 
        and Secondary Education Act of 1965, if the Secretary of 
        Education makes the determination described in paragraph (2).
            (2) Determination.--The determination referred to in 
        paragraph (1) is a determination that the performance of the 
        State educational agency, in carrying out the programs for 
        which the State has received a waiver under the educational 
        flexibility program, justifies the extension of the 
        designation.

            Passed the Senate March 2, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2363

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To extend the educational flexibility program under section 4 of the 
             Education Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JASON TUCKER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20cv125-MW/GRJ

ELIZABETH MARIE TIMOTHY,

Defendant.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 3. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “This case is DISMISSED sua 

sponte as frivolous without leave to amend.” The Clerk shall also close the file.

SO ORDERED on July 24, 2020.

s/ MARK E. WALKER

Chief United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00125-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/24/20 Page 1 of 1
#### § 29.3620 Rule 19.

Any lot of tobacco containing 20 percent or more of green leaves or any lot which is not crude but contains 20 percent or more of green and crude combined shall be designated by the color symbol “G.”
# L_2021087EN.01001701.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 87/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 87/17

---

COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) 2021/445

of 12 March 2021

repealing Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 215 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/449 of 12 March 2021 repealing Decision 2011/172/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (1),

Having regard to the joint proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/172/CFSP (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/172/CFSP (2).

| (2) | Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 (3) gives effect to Decision 2011/172/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 (3) gives effect to Decision 2011/172/CFSP.

| (3) | On 12 March 2021, the Council adopted Decision (CSFP) 2021/449, which repealed Decision 2011/172/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 12 March 2021, the Council adopted Decision (CSFP) 2021/449, which repealed Decision 2011/172/CFSP.

| (4) | Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 should therefore be repealed, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 should therefore be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 is hereby repealed.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 March 2021.

For the Council

The President

A. P. ZACARIAS

---

(1)  See page 46 of this Official Journal.

1

(2)  Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 63).

2

(3)  Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 4).

3

---