alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70898-70899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29347]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice--AMENDED

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, November 19, 2010; 8:45 a.m. EST.

PLACE: 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning
    <bullet> Approval of New Black Panther Party Enforcement Report
    <bullet> Motion Regarding Healthcare Disparities Report 
Commissioner Statements & Rebuttals
    <bullet> Consideration of Findings and Recommendations for Briefing 
Report on English-Only in the Workplace
    <bullet> Update on FY 2011 Cy Pres Enforcement Report & 
Consideration of Project Outline and Discovery Plan
    <bullet> Consideration of Policy on Commissioner Statements and 
Rebuttals
    <bullet> Discussion of Possible Briefing Topics for FY 2011
    <bullet> Update on Status of Briefing on Disparate Impact in School 
Discipline Policies
    <bullet> Update on Sex Discrimination in Liberal Arts College 
Admissions--Some of the discussion of this agenda item may be held in 
closed session

[[Page 70899]]

    <bullet> Update on Clearinghouse Project
III. State Advisory Committee Issues
    <bullet> Kentucky SAC
    <bullet> Maryland SAC
    <bullet> Vermont SAC
    <bullet> Wisconsin SAC
    <bullet> Update on Status of Remaining SACs to Recharter
IV. Management & Operations
    <bullet> Expiration of Commissioner Terms
V. Approval of Minutes of October 8 Meeting
VI. Adjourn

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: November 17, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-29347 Filed 11-17-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 245 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 245

 To amend the Truth in Lending Act to allow certain loans that are not 
     fully amortizing to be used in seller carryback financing on 
                      residential mortgage loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2013

Mr. Schweikert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Truth in Lending Act to allow certain loans that are not 
     fully amortizing to be used in seller carryback financing on 
                      residential mortgage loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVING LIMITATION.

    Section 103(cc)(2)(E) of the Truth in Lending Act (as added by 
section 1401 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
Protection Act) is amended--
            (1) by striking clause (ii); and
            (2) by redesignating clauses (iii), (iv), and (v) as 
        clauses (ii), (iii), and (iv), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
Forest Roads Discussion 

EPA & NAFO 

3/24/16 

WJC East, Room 4349
§ 3560.574 Operating assistance. Operating assistance may be used in lieu of tenant-specific rental assistance in off-farm labor housing projects financed under section 514 or section 516(i) of the Housing Act of 1949 (U.S.C. 1486(i)) that serve migrant farmworkers. Owners of eligible projects may choose tenant-specific rental assistance as described in § 3560.573 or operating assistance, or a combination of both, however, any tenant or unit assisted under this section may not receive rental assistance under § 3560.572. The objective of this program is to provide assistance toward the cost of operating the project so that rents may be set at rates that are affordable to very low and low-income migrant farmworkers. ( a ) *Project eligibility requirements.* To be eligible for the operating assistance program, projects must be: ( 1 ) Off-farm labor housing projects financed under section 514 or section 516 with units that are for migrant farmworkers. Housing units for year-round farmworker households are ineligible; and
( 2 ) Eligible for the Agency's rental assistance program as defined in § 3560.573.
( b ) *Operating assistance limits.* The amount of operating assistance requested by the owner must be based on the project's actual income and expenses and must be approved by the Agency. In the case of a mixed project, the amount of operating assistance must be based on the portion of actual income and expenses that are attributable to the units that are for migrant farmworkers. In no instance may the annual amount of operating assistance exceed 90 percent of the annual operating costs that are attributable to the migrant units.
( c ) *Owner responsibilities* — ( 1 ) *Requesting for operating assistance program.* Owners of off-farm labor housing projects with units for migrant farmworkers may request operating assistance by submitting a request to the Agency, which must include a budget. The budget must include: ( i ) Estimated operating costs for the migrant units, including authorized expenditures such as reserve deposits;
( ii ) Proposed rental rates for the migrant units to generate sufficient funds for operating costs of those units, taking into consideration all other sources of project income; and
( iii ) Estimated rental income from tenants, based on a tenant contribution of 30 percent of the average adjusted monthly income of migrant farmworker households in the area.
( 2 ) *Requesting operating assistance payments.* Each month, the owner will submit a request for operating assistance to the Agency.
( 3 ) *Verifying tenant income eligibility.* Owners are responsible for verifying tenant income eligibility. Only very low or low-income households are eligible for the operating assistance rents. Households with incomes above the low-income limits must pay the full rent.
( 4 ) *Reporting requirements.* ( i ) Owners will complete and submit to the Agency tenant certifications to document tenant income and eligibility.
( ii ) Owners will complete and submit monthly to the Agency a project worksheet for operating assistance.
( iii ) Owners must submit an annual planning budget to the Agency prior to the project's fiscal year.
§ 3560.624 Occupancy restrictions. ( a ) The immediate relatives of the borrowers are ineligible occupants for on-farm labor housing.
( b ) Occupants must meet the definition of a domestic farm laborer, as defined in § 3560.11. (a) Occupancy of on-farm labor housing is restricted to employees of the borrower unless otherwise approved by the Agency.
( d ) With prior written permission of the Agency, on-farm labor housing may be occupied by ineligible tenants on a short-term basis. The permission of the Agency must also be for a limited duration.
#### § 402.2 Applicability.

This Catastrophic Risk Protection Endorsement is applicable to each crop for which catastrophic risk protection coverage is available and for which the producer elects such coverage.
# 11.304 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.211-5, Material Requirements, in *solicitations* and contracts for *supplies* that are not *commercial products*.          

**Parent topic:**Subpart 11.3 - Acceptable Material
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:99cr84-02/RV

DEBORAH STUCK VEITH

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on May 28, 2009 

Motion/Pleadings: Motion to transfer funds 

Filed by United States on 5/27/2009 Doc.# 88

RESPONSES:

 on Doc.# 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 15th day of 

 June , 2009, that:

(a) The relief requested is GRANTED.

(b) 

 /s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:99-cr-00084-RV Document 89 Filed 06/15/09 Page 1 of 1
#### F. W. Woolworth Company, Respondent, v. Commission of Taxation & Assessment of the City of Plattsburgh, Appellant. S. S. Kresge Company, Respondent, v. Commission of Taxation & Assessment of the City of Plattsburgh, Appellant. Verdun Radio Centre, Inc., Respondent, v. Commission of Taxation & Assessment of the City of Plattsburgh, Appellant.

Decision of this court dated November 7, 1966 [26 A D 2d 759], rescinded and motion for reargument or, in the alternative, for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals, denied, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
- /app03/pdfs/499cv/002/42/2390t/00077001.tif
- /app03/pdfs/499cv/002/42/2390t/00077002.tif
#### § 3430.37 Feedback to applicants.

Copies of individual reviews and/or summary reviews, not including the identity of reviewers, will be sent to the applicant PDs after the review process has been completed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



April 30, 2010

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F
Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the
Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/    Kenneth M. Jacobs                              
|Kenneth M. Jacobs Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 391]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ391.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 2243]]

Public Law 108-391
108th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress in recognition of the contributions 
   of the seven Columbia astronauts by supporting establishment of a 
   Columbia Memorial Space Science Learning Center. <<NOTE: Oct. 30, 
                        2004 -  [H.J. Res. 57]>> 

Whereas the crew of the space shuttle Columbia was dedicated to 
    scientific research and stimulating the interest of American 
    children in space flight and science;

Whereas the Columbia crew carried out science projects of American 
    schoolchildren;

Whereas the members of that crew gave their lives trying to benefit the 
    education of American children;

Whereas a fitting tribute to that effort and to the sacrifice of the 
    Columbia crew and their families is needed;

Whereas an appropriate form for such tribute would be to expand 
    educational opportunities in science by the creation of a center and 
    museum to offer children and teachers activities and information 
    derived from American space research;

Whereas the former manufacturing site of the space shuttles (including 
    the Columbia and the Challenger) in the City of Downey, California, 
    is a fitting site for such a tribute;

Whereas residents of Downey are proud of their role in building the 
    space shuttle fleet and in furthering the Nation's space program; 
    and

Whereas city officials have been working with NASA representatives to 
    develop the center in Downey: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That it is the sense of the 
Congress that--
            (1) <<NOTE: California.>> the space science learning center 
        in Downey, California, should be designated as the Columbia 
        Memorial Space Science Learning Center as a living memorial to 
        the seven Columbia astronauts who died serving their country in 
        the name of science and research; and

[[Page 118 STAT. 2244]]

            (2) the Federal Government, along with public and private 
        organizations and persons, should continue to cooperate in the 
        establishment of such a center.

    Approved October 30, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 57:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Oct. 5, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 10, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 3430.601 Purpose.

The purpose of the Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program (BFRDP) is to establish a beginning farmer and rancher development program that provides local and regional training, education, outreach, and technical assistance initiatives for beginning farmers and ranchers.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00651

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D .B., IV, B.N.B., AND T.L.S. , Children

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 02206 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order of termination is

AFFIRMED. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is DENIED. It is ORDERED that no cos ts be assessed against appellants in relation to this appeal because appellants qualify as indigent under

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.

SIGNED February 20, 2019.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                          932578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1596448
<ALLOWANCES>                                    411317
<INVENTORY>                                      21258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2824842
<PP&E>                                        10411511
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4490074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9185608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2657362
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           916
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4301091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9185608
<SALES>                                        2622024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2762474
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2528415
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              103372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 130687
<INCOME-TAX>                                     57685
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              73002
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     73002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
98-1460.

#### Headley v. Ohio Govt. Risk Mgt. Plan.

Muskingum App. No. CT970022. On motion to consolidate with 98-856, *Headley v. Ohio Govt. Bisk Mgt. Plan,*Muskingum App. No. CT970017, or, in the alternative, for stay. Motion to consolidate granted.

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOSEPH D. BALDINO
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 924

[ August 2, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Gary L. Sweet , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 562011CF001300A

.

Joseph D. Baldino, Bristol, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appe llee.

P ER C URIAM

.

In this appeal of a trial court order denying appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), we conclude that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule because appellant’s direc t appeal was also pending in this Court. Therefore, we

reverse and remand to the trial court to dismiss the motion without prejudice to appellant’s right to refile it after final disposition of the direct appeal. See Everett v. State , 993 So. 2d 1116 (Fl a. 4th DCA 2008); Major

v. State , 882 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Campbell

- Eley v. State , 763 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA ), rev. denied , 789 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 2000).

G ERBER
, C.J., W ARNER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 301
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear at 87 FR 80005, Dec. 29, 2022.

§ 301.45-6 Compliance agreement and cancellation thereof. ( a ) Any person engaged in the business of growing, handling, or moving regulated articles may enter into a compliance agreement to facilitate the movement of such articles under this subpart. Qualified certified applicators must enter into compliance agreements, in accordance with the definition of qualified certified applicator in § 301.45-1. A compliance agreement shall specify safeguards necessary to prevent spread of the gypsy moth, such as disinfestation practices or application of chemical materials in accordance with the treatment manual and part 305 of this chapter. Compliance agreement forms may be obtained from the Administrator or an inspector.
( b ) Any compliance agreement may be canceled by the inspector who is supervising its enforcement, orally or in writing, whenever the inspector finds that such person has failed to comply with the conditions of the agreement. If the cancellation is oral, the decision and the reasons therefore shall be confirmed in writing, as promptly as circumstances permit. Any person whose compliance agreement has been canceled may appeal the decision in writing to the Administrator within ten (10) days after receiving written notification of the cancellation. The appeal shall state all of the facts and reasons upon which the person relies to show that the compliance agreement was wrongfully canceled. The Administrator shall grant or deny the appeal, in writing, stating the reasons for such decision, as promptly as circumstances permit. If there is a conflict as to any material fact, a hearing shall be held to resolve such conflict. Rules of practice concerning such a hearing will be adopted by the Administrator.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0088) [58 FR 39423, July 23, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 46902, Sept. 13, 1994; 70 FR 33268, June 7, 2005]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alice Kegelman, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered February 5, 1979, convicting her of sodomy in the first degree, attempted grand larceny in the first degree, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, assault in the third degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Due to an oversight, and with no indication of bad faith, a taped statement made by the complainant to the police was not made available to the District Attorney, or, therefore, to the defense, until two days after the conclusion of the complainant’s testimony. However, the District Attorney made the existence of the taped statement known to the defense immediately upon his learning of it, and as the trial was still in progress at that time, the court permitted the defense to resume its cross-examination of the complainant relative to the taped statement. Under these facts, we hold that the People complied with their obligations under *People v Rosario*(9 NY2d 286) (see *People v Pinion,*56 AD2d 664). We note further that since defendant interposed a defense of duress at trial, the court acted properly in permitting the People to introduce rebuttal evidence tending to show defendant’s propensity to commit crimes similar to the crimes charged (see *People v Calvano,*30 NY2d 199). Mollen, P. J., Cohalan, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of 155 East Tropicana, LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company and155 East Tropicana Finance Corp., a Nevada corporation (collectively, the “Company”)for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Deborah J. Pierce, asChief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Deborah J. Pierce                                   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Deborah J. Pierce,  Chief Financial OfficerMay 14, 2007 |   |   |

 

The foregoing certifications are beingfurnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and are not being filed as partof the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
2005-2162.

#### Bellman v. Am. Internatl. Group.

Lucas App. No. L-03-1301, 163 Ohio App.3d 540, 2005-Ohio-5250. This cause is pending as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County. Upon consideration of the motion of appellee Auto Insurance Company to supplement the record,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is granted and that the Clerk of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas shall certify and transmit the original filings in Lucas County Common Pleas Case No. CI 2002-3525 to the Clerk of this court within 20 days of the date of this entry.
#### § 29.2266 Elements of quality.

Physical characteristics used to determine the quality of tobacco. Words selected to describe degrees within each element are shown in the chart in § 29.2351.