alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1. |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                         |
|--------|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                         | India      Globalization Capital, Inc. |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |
| Date:      November 14, 2008 | By:                                    | /s/ John B.      Selvaraj                                                                |   |
|                         |                                   | John      B. Selvaraj                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|                         |                                   | Treasurer,      Principal Financial and Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alliance Financial Corporation (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack H. Webb, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 20,
2008



/s/ Jack H.
WebbName: Jack H. WebbTitle: Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40737 Conference Calendar

WILLIE A. ROSS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TIM WEST ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-CV-358

- - - - - - - - - - October 24, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Willie A. Ross, Jr., Texas inmate #371414, appeals the dismissal, as frivolous, of his civil rights complaint. Ross argues that the defendants, by failing to provide a safe work area for him, were deliberately indifferent toward him and thus violated his right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. For essentially the same reasons as relied upon by the district court in its order of dismissal, we detect no abuse of discretionNo. 96-40737 - 2 - in the court’s frivolousness determination. See Ross v. West , No. 1:95cv358 (E.D. Tex. July 5, 1996). This appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. It is DISMISSED. We caution Ross that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Ross is further cautioned to review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court.
APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EQK REALTY INVESTORS I FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 
30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,739
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       135,875
<OTHER-SE>                                    (141,055)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,265
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,509
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      629
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (198)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (198)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
|   | 1. |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                         |
|--------|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                         | India      Globalization Capital, Inc. |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |
| Date:      February 17, 2009 | By:                                    | /s/ John B.      Selvaraj                                                                |   |
|                         |                                   | John      B. Selvaraj                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|                         |                                   | Treasurer,      Principal Financial and Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 4:96cr76-RH/WCS

4:06cv479-RH/WCS

JOE TRAVIS,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING RULE 60(b) MOTION

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 197) and the objections thereto (document 198). I

have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the opinion

of the court. Defendant’s Rule 60(b) motion (document 195) for modification of

his sentence is DENIED for failure to obtain authorization from the Court of

Appeal for the filing a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

SO ORDERED this 21st day of January, 2007.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:96-cr-00076-RH-WCS Document 199 Filed 01/22/07 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                      5
<LEGEND>
(Replace this text with legend, if applicable)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                 0000796333
<NAME>                                  Brown Flournoy Equity Income Fund
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                          U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                1
<CASH>                                                 1,467,365
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             19,744
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       1,557,609
<PP&E>                                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        16,006,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    417,042
<BONDS>                                               20,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          16,006,582
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       4,861,864
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       3,299,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1,933,782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (371,349)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (371,349)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (371,349)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.000
        


</TABLE>
Case 5:01-cr-00002-SPM-LB   Document 27   Filed 11/17/05   Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.1140 RBIC's acceptance of remedies under § 4290.1810.

If you issue Leverage, you automatically agree to the terms and conditions in § 4290.1810 as it exists at the time of issuance. The effect of these terms and conditions is the same as if they were fully incorporated in the terms of your Leverage.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:92cr4013-WS

PATRICIA CARLENE CLARKE, 4:13cv138-WS

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.

2063) docketed May 21, 2013. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

successive section 2255 motion be summarily dismissed. The defendant has filed

objections (doc. 2066) to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record in light of the defendant’s objections, this court has

determined that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 2063) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The defendant’s successive section 2255 motion (doc. 2062) is hereby

summarily DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are summarily dismissed."
Page 2 of 2

4. The clerk shall close Case No. 4:13cv138-WS.

5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of June , 2013.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 4:92cr4013-WS
§ 4274.331 IRP revolving loan fund loan conditions and terms. ( a ) *Conditions and terms.* Loan conditions and terms made by an intermediary to an ultimate recipient from the IRP revolving loan fund will be negotiated by the intermediary and ultimate recipient. ( 1 ) *Interest rate.* The interest rate must be within limits established by the intermediary's work plan approved by the Agency. The rate must be the lowest rate sufficient to cover the loan's proportional share of the IRP revolving loan fund's debt service reserve and administrative costs.
( 2 ) *Repayment.* The loan term must be reasonable and prudent considering the purpose of the loan, expected repayment ability of the ultimate recipient, and the useful life of collateral, and must be within any limits established by the intermediary's work plan approved by the Agency.
( b ) *Security.* The intermediary is responsible for adherence to prudent lending practices when obtaining adequate security on each of its ultimate recipient loans.
( c ) *Loan limits.* Loans from intermediaries to ultimate recipients using the IRP revolving loan fund must not exceed the limits in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section. In accordance with § 4274.321(b)(5), these loan limits apply to ultimate recipients cumulatively based on all existing and pending loans from one or multiple IRP intermediaries. The loan limits of ultimate recipient loans made from Agency IRP funds may be based on the total amount of the Agency IRP loans awarded. However, should any portion of an intermediary's Agency IRP loan funds be de-obligated by the Agency, the ultimate recipient loan limit will thereafter be based on the actual amount of Agency IRP loan funds advanced to the intermediary and loaned out to ultimate recipients. Intermediaries with multiple IRP loans that have combined those IRP funds in accordance with § 4274.332(b)(6) may base their ultimate recipient loan limits on the combined amount of Agency IRP loans. The maximum amount of an IRP Agency loan made by an intermediary to an ultimate recipient, whether directly or held through loan participation and including the balance of any existing ultimate recipient loans, shall be the lesser of: ( 1 ) $400,000; and
( 2 ) Fifty percent of the originally-approved Agency IRP loan amount to an intermediary (including the unpaid balance of any existing ultimate recipient loans).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Estes, 7:20cv137

Hacker, 7:20cv131

Keefer, 7:20cv104

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

EXHIBITS ORDER NO. 2

This Order addresses a portion of the parties’ objections to exhibits. The 

Court’s rulings are set forth in the attached Exhibit 1. 

SO ORDERED, on this 24th day of March, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00137-MCR-GRJ Document 115 Filed 03/24/21 Page 1 of 1
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2320 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]







                                                       Calendar No. 363
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2320

 To make available funds included in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 
for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program for fiscal year 2006, 
                        and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2006

 Ms. Snowe (for herself, Mr. Coleman, and Ms. Collins) introduced the 
             following bill; which was read the first time

                           February 17, 2006

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To make available funds included in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 
for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program for fiscal year 2006, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDS FOR LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 9001 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``for a 1-time only obligation and 
                expenditure'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``fiscal year 
                2007'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2006''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ``fiscal year 
                2007'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2006'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c);
            (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Limitation.--None of the funds made available under this 
section may be used for the planning and administering described in 
section 2605(b)(9) of the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 
(42 U.S.C. 8624(b)(9)).''; and
            (4) in subsection (c) (as redesignated by paragraph (2)), 
        by striking ``September 30, 2007'' and inserting ``September 
        30, 2006''.
                                                       Calendar No. 363

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2320

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To make available funds included in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 
for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program for fiscal year 2006, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 17, 2006

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar`