alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0307 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. ROBERT MICHAEL ZERMENO,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 5, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 28 2024

05/28/2024
Case Number: DA 23-0307
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DYLAN EGLESTON, individually and 

on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-106-AW-GRJ

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD 

OF TRUSTEES, AS THE PUBLIC 

BODY CORPORATE OF UNIVERSITY 

OF FLORIDA,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for an extension (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED.

Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to the pending motion to dismiss (ECF No. 9) is

extended to July 10, 2020.

SO ORDERED on June 15, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00106-AW-GRJ Document 11 Filed 06/15/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29030]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. ER11-1939-000]


AP Gas & Electric (PA), LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

November 9, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding AP 
Gas & Electric (PA), LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 29, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#682e2d3a2b27060401060d3b1d1818071a1c280e0d1a0b460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5a1c1f081915343633343f092f2a2a35282e1a3c3f2839743d352c">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29030 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 

32.1 

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF

THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Entremetrix Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for thequarterly period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott W. Absher, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in	the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial	condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: November 15, 2004   |  By: /s/Scott W. Absher            |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                            | Scott W. Absher, Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
2005-0338.

#### State v. Bezak.

Cuyahoga App. No. 84008, 2004-Ohio-6623. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this case is no longer held for the decisions in 2004-1171, *State v. Mathis,*Cuyahoga App. No. 83311, 2004-Ohio-2982, and 2004-1267, *State v. Fair,*Cuyahoga App. No. 82278, 2004-Ohio-2971. The Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, and the parties shall brief this case on Proposition of Law No. I in accordance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio.
§ 3565.215 Special conditions. ( a ) *Use of third party funds.* As a condition of receiving a guaranteed loan, the Agency, or the lender if designated by the Agency, must review the terms and conditions of any secondary financing or funding of projects, including loans, capital grants or rental assistance.
( b ) *Recourse.* If required by the lender, loans guaranteed under this program may be made on a recourse or nonrecourse basis, or with any personal or special borrower guarantees on collateralization.
Notification of the Interim Final FIP – Signed by Lisa Jackson Notification of the Interim Final FIP – Signed by Lisa Jackson , , EPA Administrator 40 CFR Part CFR Part CFR Part

49 – Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities Production Facilities ,

, Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation ( Mandan , Hidatsa and

Hidatsa and Hidatsa and Arikara Nations Arikara Nations ,

, or MHA Nation or MHA Nation or MHA Nation )

, North Dakota North Dakota North Dakota . (

as defined in § as defined in § as defined in § 49.152 Carl Daly Carl Daly to: dbell 08/02/2012 11:18 AM Cc: tskinner, bjamieson, Deirdre Rothery, Kate Fay, Sara Laumann This message is digitally signed. Mr. Bell, This email is to inform you that Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, has signed an interim final rule “Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities Production Facilities ,

, Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation ( Mandan , Hidatsa and Arikara Nations

Hidatsa and Arikara Nations Hidatsa and Arikara Nations , or MHA Nation Nation) ) , North Dakota North Dakota North Dakota ,

” (Fort Berthold Oil and Gas FIP) a federal rule that applies to oil and gas operations producing from the Bakken Pool on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation in North Dakota . The FIP requires owners and operators of oil and natural gas production facilities to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds emanating from well completions , recompletions, and production and storage operations. The agency proposed a Reservation-specific FIP concurrently with this interim final rule . Please find, attached, a copy of the notification sent by certified mail to the primary contact for Spotted Hawk Development:

Spotted Hawk_Actual Notice of FIP Letter 8-1-12.pdf And a copy of the interim final rule:

Fort Berthold FIP NFR_8-1-12 (interim final rule) f or ACTUAL NOTICE LETTERS.pdf If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me or Deirdre Rothery, Chief Air Permitting, Monitoring and Modeling Unit at rothery.deirdre@epa.gov or 303-312-6431. Thank you, Carl Daly, Director, Air Program 303-312-6416
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:03cr40-SPM

HONAY RODRIGUEZ HERNANDEZ

and FRANCISCO PEREZ,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER DEEMING RESTITUTION SATISFIED

This cause comes before the Court on the Government’s Petition

Requesting to Have Restitution Deemed Satisfied (doc. 80). The Government

explains that Defendants were ordered in their criminal judgments to make

restitution to Allied Insurance, a.k.a. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. A

settlement has been accepted by Nationwide, which is closing its account as

paid in full. Nationwide requests that no further restitution payments be sent. 

Based on the foregoing, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Government’s petition (doc. 80) is granted. 

2. The restitution owed by Defendants to Allied Insurance, a.k.a.

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, is deemed satisfied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of July, 2008.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cr-00040-SPM Document 81 Filed 07/02/09 Page 1 of 1
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amalgamated Pictures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 17, 2013

| /s/ Avery Pack                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| Avery Pack, President and          Chief Executive Officer          (Principal Executive Officer) and          Acting Chief Financial Officer          (Principal Financial Officer and          Principal Accounting Officer) |
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


The undersigned, Roger S. Huntington, Chief Financial Officer of SurgiCare,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certifies that:

(1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  September 2, 2004

By:        /s/ Roger S. Huntington
           -----------------------
           Roger S. Huntington, Chief Accounting Officer



                                       29
**BRIEFING ONCIVIL RIGHTSISSUESFACINGMUSLIMS ANDARABAMERICANSIN INDIANAPOST-SEPTEMBER 11**

**BEFORE THEINDIANAADVISORYCOMMITTEE TOTHE  U.S. COMMISSION ONCIVILRIGHTS**

**MAY30, 2002**

Members of the Indiana   Advisory Committee

Executive Summary

Transcript
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10180 Conference Calendar

JAMES MCCARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MARTIN A. LEET, TDCJ Clements Unit Employee, Defendant-Appellee.

************* JAMES MCCARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN A. CONNELLY, JR., TDCJ Clements Unit Officiers of Transporation Department; PAUL T. GEORGE, TDCJ Clements Unit Officers of Transportation Department, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:94-CV-8 & 2:94-CV-9

- - - - - - - - - - February 11, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * James McCarter (TDCJ #498365) appeals the jury verdict in favor of the defendants in his civil rights suit. McCarter,No. 97-10180 -2- however, merely reargues the merits of why he believes the defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights. As reflected by its verdict, the jury obviously credited the testimony of the defendants over that of McCarter. This court will not disturb such choice on appeal. See Martin v. Thomas , 973 F.2d 449, 453 & n.3 (5th Cir. 1992). Insofar as McCarter challenges the weight of the evidence supporting the jury verdict, this court is unable to review such a claim without the transcript. See Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp. , 5 F.3d 877, 890 (5th Cir. 1993), reh’g en banc granted , 20 F.3d 614 (1994), opinion reinstated in pertinent part , 61 F.3d 1113, 1118 (1995). Because there is no issue of arguable merit, the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution McCarter that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, McCarter is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 31.1
                         CERTIFICATION

I, Greg Amato, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Epolin, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

          (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

          (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal
quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

          (a)  All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting.



Dated:  May 22, 2006         By: /s/ Greg Amato
                                Greg Amato, Chief Executive
                                Officer (Principal Executive
                                Officer)
ex_10-12.htm


    
      

      

    

    Exhibit
10.12

     

    
      LOAN
AGREEMENT

      February
11, 2009

      


      Richard N. Jeffs (the
“Lender”) of 4 Montpelier Street, Suite 521, London, SW71EE, advanced US$25,000 (the “Principal
Sum”) to Red Metal Resources Ltd. (the “Borrower”) of 195 Park Avenue, Thunder
Bay, Ontario, P7B 1B9.  The Lender advanced the funds on February 11,
2009

       

      The
Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest
calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 8% per year (the “Interest”)
from February 11, 2009.  The Borrower is liable for repayment for the
Principal Sum and accrued Interest and any costs that the Lender incurs in
trying to collect the Principal Sum and the Interest.

       

      The
Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the
Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.

       

      
        
          	LENDER    	 	 	BORROWER	 
	Richard N.
      Jeffs  	 	 	Red Metal Resources
      Ltd.	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Per:   	 	 	Per:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  /s/
      Richard N. Jeffs

                	 	 	
                  /s/
      Caitlin Jeffs 

                	 
	
                  Name

                	 	 	
                  Authorized
      Signatory

                	 


        

      

                                                                    

      
        
          
          

        

        
          1

          
            

          

        

        
          
          

        

      

      


      PROMISSORY
NOTE

       

      
        	Principal
      Amount:  US$25,000 	
                February 11,
      2009

              


      

       

      For value
received Red Metal Resources Ltd., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to
the order of Richard N. Jeffs (the “Lender”) the sum
of $25,000 lawful money of United States of America (the “Principal Sum”)
together with interest on the Principal Sum from February 11, 2009 (“Effective
Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate
as defined below.

      


      For the
purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 8 per cent per
year.  Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded
monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective
rate of 8.3% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the
Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.

      


      The
Borrower may repay the Principal Sum and the Interest in whole or in part at any
time.

      


      The
Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour
of this promissory note.

      


      
        	 	 	 	BORROWER	 
	 	 	 	Red Metal Resources
      Ltd.	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	Per:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                 

              	 	 	
                /s/
      Caitlin Jeffs

              	 
	
                 

              	 	 	
                

                  Authorized Signatory 

                

              	 


      

    

     

     

    2
§ 3201.48 General purpose household cleaners. ( a ) *Definition.* Products designed to clean multiple common household surfaces. This designated item does not include products that are formulated for use as disinfectants. Task-specific cleaning products, such as spot and stain removers, upholstery cleaners, bathroom cleaners, glass cleaners, etc., are not included in this item.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 39 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than October 27, 2010, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased general purpose household cleaners. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased general purpose household cleaners.
[74 FR 55093, Oct. 27, 2009]
PUBLIC LAW 108–433—DEC. 3, 2004 118 STAT. 2613

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 111:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Nov. 17, considered and passed House.

Nov. 19, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–433

108th Congress

Joint Resolution

Appointing the day for the convening of the first session of the One Hundred

Ninth Congress.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the first

regular session of the One Hundred Ninth Congress shall begin

at noon on Tuesday, January 4, 2005.

Approved December 3, 2004.

Dec. 3, 2004

[H.J. Res. 111]