alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3550.117 WWD grant purposes. Grant funds may be used to pay the reasonable costs for individuals to: ( a ) Extend service lines from the system to their residence.
( b ) Connect service lines to residence's plumbing.
( c ) Pay reasonable charges or fees for connecting to a system.
( d ) Pay for necessary installation of plumbing and related fixtures within dwellings lacking such facilities. This is limited to one bathtub, sink, commode, kitchen sink, water heater, and outside spigot.
( e ) Construction and/or partitioning off a portion of the dwelling for a bathroom, not to exceed 4.6 square meters (48 square feet) in size.
( f ) Pay reasonable costs for closing abandoned septic tanks and water wells when necessary to protect the health and safety of recipients of a grant for a purpose provided in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section and is required by local or State law.
( g ) Make improvements to individual's residence when needed to allow the use of the water and/or waste disposal system.
[67 FR 78331, Dec. 24, 2002]
- PREFACES; BACKGROUND; TOXICOLOGY
PREFACE
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
BACKGROUND
TOXICOLOGY
- Metabolism
- Toxicologic Mechanisms
- Toxicity in Humans & Animals
- Genotoxic Effects
- Carcinogenic Effects

- MONITORING; EXPOSURE & ADVERSE EFFECTS; SUMMARIES; APPX
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I, Eric Bello, Chief Financial Officer of Quipp, Inc., a Florida corporation (the Company), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:



(1)

The Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

* * *





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | / s / ERIC BELLO       
| | Eric Bello             
| | Chief Financial Officer



Date:

March 31, 2008
#### §§ 3555.55-3555.99 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**          I, James E. Minarik, certify that:          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Directed Electronics, Inc.;          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;          4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and          5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                                   /s/ James E. Minarik   James E. Minarik  Date: August 14, 2006 Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Meeting and Roundtable Discussion.

# DATE AND TIME:

 Thursday, December 2, 2010. 10-11:30 a.m. (EST). 1:30-5 p.m. (EST).

# PLACE:

 U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave., Suite 150,  Washington, DC 20005, 202-566-3100.

# MEETING AGENDA:

 The Commission will hold a public meeting to receive updates on the following topics: Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) products; election official mentorship project. Commissioners will consider other administrative matters.

# ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION:

The Commission will host a roundtable discussion with participants from the election official community and voting manufacturer industries to review the 2010 election.

Members of the public may observe but not participate in EAC meetings unless this notice provides otherwise. Members of the public may use small electronic audio recording devices to record the proceedings. The use of other recording equipment and cameras requires advance notice to and coordination with the Commission's Communications Office.*

                        * View                         *EAC Regulations Implementing Government in the Sunshine Act*.                    

This meeting and hearing will be open to the public.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

 Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-3100. 

Alice Miller,

Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-29791 Filed 11-22-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
#### Parochial Bus System, Inc., Respondent, v Harrison J. Goldin, as Comptroller of the City of New York, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered September 18, 1978, which granted petitioner’s application for an order quashing the Comptroller’s subpoena duces tecum and denying Comptroller’s cross motion for an order compelling compliance, modified, on the law and the facts, without costs, to grant Comptroller’s cross motion for compliance and correspondingly denying petitioner’s motion to quash, limiting, however, those items which specify varied financial and corporate records and documents for the period of 1970 to 1977 and 1971 to 1977 to the period 1974 to 1977, and otherwise affirmed, without prejudice to the issuance of a new subpoena duces tecum for an earlier period after examination of the subpoenaed documents and upon a further showing of relevance. The question presented is whether the Comptroller of the City of New York, in connection with an audit of the New York City Board of Education pupil transportation system, is authorized by section 93 of the New York City Charter to issue a subpoena duces tecum for corporate and financial books and records of a contractor which has been supplying pupil transportation for a number of years. In *Matter of Goldin v Greenberg*(49 NY2d 566), a case presenting essentially the same issue, the Court of Appeals decided this dispositive question in the affirmative. We also conclude, as did the Court of Appeals in *Goldin v Greenberg (supra),*that the record adequately supports the conclusion that the categories of materials sought bear a reasonable relationship to the Comptroller’s inquiry. We are not, however, persuaded that an adequate showing has been made justifying the examination of detailed corporate and financial records for periods extending back to 1971 and 1970. As to such items in the subpoena duces tecum, a period extending back to 1974 appears to us on this record adequate for the indicated purposes. This, of course, is without prejudice to the issuance of a new subpoena duces tecum by the Comptroller after an examination of the subpoenaed documents on an appropriate showing of need for documents extending back to an earlier period. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan and Bloom, JJ.
#### John L. CORRIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VISA USA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-35129.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 27, 2007.*

Filed Aug. 31, 2007.

*509John L. Corrigan, Auburn, WA, pro se.

Aloysius Grant Lingg, Forsberg & Umlaut, P.S., Seattle, WA, for Visa USA.

Philip M. Guess, Esq., Martha Rodriguez-Lopez, Esq., Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis, LLP, Seattle, WA, for Boeing Employees’ Credit Union Financial Services Inc.

Janine C. Blatt, Esq., Jeffrey J. Druckman, Esq., Druckman & Blatt, Portland, OR, for Walgreen Company, Destination Harley-Davidson LLC and Radioshack Corporation.

James M. Shore, Esq., Maren Roxanne Norton, Esq., Stoel Rives, LLP, Seattle, WA, for Peekay Inc.

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

John L. Corrigan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging, *inter alia,*that his credit card issuer and various merchants violated the Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”) by requiring Corrigan to provide valid identification before processing his credit card transactions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After de novo review, *Vestar Dev. II v. Gen. Dynamics Corp.,*249 F.3d 958, 960 (9th Cir.2001), we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Corrigan’s TILA claims because TILA does not prohibit the practice of which Corrigan complains, and the statute clearly contemplates that such methods of identification will be used. *See*15 U.S.C. § 1643(a)(1)(F).

The district court also properly dismissed Corrigan’s contract claims because Corrigan failed to plead any facts indicating the breach of any valid contract to which Corrigan is a party. *See Hairston v. Pac. 10 Conf.,*101 F.3d 1315, 1320 (9th Cir.1996) (explaining meaning of “third-party beneficiary” under Washington law); *see also*Wash. Rev.Code § 19.192.020 (“Any provision of a contract between a merchant or retailer and a credit or debit card issuer ... that prohibits the merchant or retailer from verifying the identity of a customer ... by requiring or requesting that the customer present additional identification is void for violation of public policy.”)

Corrigan’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      L. Paul Latham                            |
|----------------------------------------------------|
| L.      Paul Latham                                |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer         |
| of      Southwest Royalties, Inc., the             |
| Managing      General Partner of                   |
| Southwest      Royalties, Inc. Income Fund VI      |
|                                               |
| March      28, 2008                                |
|                                               |
|                                               |
| /s/      Mel G. Riggs                              |
| Mel      G. Riggs                                  |
| Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer of |
| Southwest      Royalties, Inc., the                |
| Managing      General Partner of                   |
| Southwest      Royalties, Inc. Income Fund VI      |
|                                               |
| March      28, 2008                                |
# 4.1303 Contract clause.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.204-9, Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel, in *solicitations* and contracts when contract performance requires contractors to have routine physical access to a Federally-controlled facility and/or routine access to a *Federally-controlled information system*. The clause *shall* not be used when contractors require only intermittent access to *Federally-controlled facilities*.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 4.13 - Personal Identity Verification
#### § 3560.629 Security deposits.

Borrowers that require security deposits to be paid by the tenants will be required to comply with the requirements of § 3560.204.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2591 

To amend certain provisions of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act 

of 2012. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2013 

Mr. GRIMM (for himself, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. HANNA, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. ROSKAM, and Mr. BURGESS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend certain provisions of the FAA Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROLLOVER OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED IN AIRLINE 

4 CARRIER BANKRUPTCY. 

5 (a) EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CLAIM FOR RE6 FUND.—Section 1106(a)(3) of the FAA Modernization 

7 and Reform Act of 2012 (26 U.S.C. 408 note) is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2591 IH

1 (b) DEFINITIONS AND SPECIAL RULES.—Section 

2 1106(c) of such Act is amended— 

3 (1) in paragraph (1)(A)(i) by inserting ‘‘or filed 

4 on November 29, 2011,’’ after ‘‘2007,’’; and 

5 (2) in paragraph (2)(B)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘terminated or’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘terminated,’’; and 

8 (B) by inserting ‘‘, or was frozen effective 

9 November 1, 2012’’ after ‘‘Pension Protection 

10 Act of 2006’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
ss.1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Datascension Inc. (the "Company")on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report")"Report"), I,
David Lieberman, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ David LiebermanDAVID
      LIEBERMAN
                    Prin.
      Accounting
Officer





Dated:  April 10, 2009
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS 

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JUAN CATANO v. 3M COMPANY, et al.

7:20-cv-73072-MCR-HTC

Case No. 3:19-md-2885

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Hope T. Cannon

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Gregory D. Brown of Fleming Nolen & Jez, LLP, has been 

admitted to practice pro hac vice in this Court, and hereby enters his appearance as counsel for 

Plaintiff Juan Catano. Counsel requests all further papers and pleadings in this action be served 

upon him at the e-mail address listed below. 

Dated: 2/27/2023 Respectfully submitted,

FLEMING, NOLEN & JEZ, LLP

/s/ Gregory D. Brown

Gregory D. Brown (admitted pro hac vice)

2800 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 4000

Houston, Texas 77056

(713) 621-7944

(713) 621-9638 (Fax)

gregory_brown@fleming-law.com

Counsel for Plaintiff Juan Catano

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3684 Filed 02/27/23 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify a true and correct copy of the foregoing was electronically filed via the 

Court’s CM/ECF system on February 27, 2023, which will automatically service notice of this 

filing via e-mail to all registered counsel of record. 

/s/ Gregory D. Brown

Gregory D. Brown 

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3684 Filed 02/27/23 Page 2 of 2
```

[108th Congress Public Law 396]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ396.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 2250]]

Public Law 108-396
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To modify the boundary of the Harry S Truman National Historic Site in 
    the State of Missouri, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 30, 
                         2004 -  [H.R. 4579]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Truman Farm Home 
Expansion Act. 16 USC 461 note.>> 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Truman Farm Home Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. HARRY S TRUMAN NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

    The first section of Public Law 98-32 (16 U.S.C. 461 note) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:

    ``(d) Acquisition of Additional Land.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may acquire, by donation, 
        purchase with donated or appropriated funds, transfer from 
        another Federal agency, or any other means, the land described 
        in paragraph (2) for inclusion in the Harry S Truman National 
        Historic Site.
            ``(2) Description of land.--The land referred to in 
        paragraph (1) consists of the approximately 5 acres of land 
        (including the structure located south of the Truman Farm Home 
        site), as generally depicted on the map entitled `Harry S Truman 
        National Historic Site Proposed Boundary', numbered 492/80,027, 
        and dated April 17, 2003.
            ``(3) Boundary modification.--On acquisition of the land 
        under this subsection, the Secretary shall modify the boundary 
        of the Harry S Truman National Historic Site to reflect the 
        acquisition of the land.''.

    Approved October 30, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4579:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108-703 (Comm. on Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Sept. 28, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 10, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
#### § 3300.40 General.

Any public or private organization incorporated or chartered under the laws of, and with principal office in, the United States may apply to have one or more of its facilities in the United States designated as a U.S. ATP testing laboratory.
**Exhibit
      23.1**




**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**








We
      consent
      to the use of our report dated March 12, 2007 (“Report”), in the 2006 Annual
      Report on Form 10-K of ANTs software inc. (the “Company”) and we further consent
      to the incorporation by reference of our Report in the Registration Statements
      on Form S-8 (No. 333-46766, No. 333-62206 and No. 333-105507) of the
      Company.








/s/
      Burr,
      Pilger & Mayer LLP





San
      Francisco, California


March
      15,
      2007