alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2210 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6 Dichlorotoluene. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2006 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6 

Dichlorotoluene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,6 DICHLOROTOLUENE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.32.82 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2,6 Dichlorotoluene) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•S 2210 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DARRELL WASHINGTON,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5450-LC-HTC

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

/

ORD ER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report

and Recommendation dated July 16, 2020 (ECF No. 5). The parties have been

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that

it should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. 5) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-05450-LC-HTC Document 6 Filed 08/19/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The complaint (ECF Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a

Court order.

3. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of August, 2020.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv5450-LC-HTC

Case 3:20-cv-05450-LC-HTC Document 6 Filed 08/19/20 Page 2 of 2
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2495 

To authorize the National Mall Liberty Fund D.C. to establish a memorial 

on Federal land in the District of Columbia to honor slaves and other 

persons that fought for independence, liberty, and justice for all during 

the American Revolution. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 3, 2006 

Mr. DODD (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. BYRD, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. OBAMA, 

Mr. ALLEN, and Mrs. DOLE) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the National Mall Liberty Fund D.C. to establish a memorial on Federal land in the District of Columbia to honor slaves and other persons that fought for 

independence, liberty, and justice for all during the 

American Revolution. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Liberty Me5 morial Act’’. 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 2495 IS

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL LIBERTY MEMORIAL. 

2 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The National Mall Liberty 

3 Fund D.C. may establish the National Liberty Memorial 

4 (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Memorial’’) on the Federal 

5 land described in subsection (b) to honor— 

6 (1) the thousands of persons of African descent 

7 that volunteered as free persons or were compelled 

8 as slaves during the American Revolution to— 

9 (A) serve as soldiers and sailors; or 

10 (B) provide civilian assistance; 

11 (2) the men, women, and children that fled 

12 bondage or filed petitions with courts and legisla13 tures seeking liberty; and 

14 (3) other people of the United States, including 

15 whites and members of Indian tribes, that advocated 

16 for liberty, justice, and citizenship for persons of Af17 rican descent. 

18 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The Federal land re19 ferred to in subsection (a) is the portion of Constitution 

20 Gardens, located on the south side of Constitution Lake 

21 and west of the island, that was selected as the site for 

22 the memorial authorized under section 1 of Public Law 

23 99–558 (40 U.S.C. 1003 note; 100 Stat. 3144). 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•S 2495 IS

1 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The Memorial shall be estab2 lished in accordance with chapter 89 of title 40, United 

3 States Code. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Subpart 8.1 - Excess Personal Property

Parent topic: Part 8 - Required Sources of Supplies and Services

8.101 [Reserved]

8.102 Policy.

When practicable, agencies shall use excess personal property as the first source of supply for

agency and cost-reimbursement contractor requirements. Agency personnel shall make positive

efforts to satisfy agency requirements by obtaining and using excess personal property (including

that suitable for adaptation or substitution) before initiating a contract action.

8.103 Information on available excess personal property.

Information regarding the availability of excess personal property can be obtained through—-

(a) Reviewing and requesting available excess personal property in GSAXcess® (see

https://gsaxcess.gov); and

(b) Personal contact with GSA or the activity holding the property.

8.104 Obtaining nonreportable property.

GSA will assist agencies in meeting their requirements for supplies of the types excepted from

reporting as excess by the Federal Management Regulations (41 CFR 102-36.220). Federal agencies

requiring such supplies should contact the appropriate GSA Personal Property Management office.

Visit www.gsa.gov/ppmo for contact information.
#### §§ 4279.211-4279.213 [Reserved]
4.404 Contract clause.       (a)                    						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.204-2, Security Requirements, in solicitations and contracts when the contract may require access to classified information, unless the conditions specified in paragraph (d) of this section apply.                                          (b)                    						            If a cost contract (see 16.302) for research and development with an educational institution is contemplated, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its Alternate I.                                          (c)                    						            If a construction or architect-engineer contract where employee identification is required for security reasons is contemplated, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its Alternate II.                                          (d)                    						            If the contracting agency is not covered by the NISP and has prescribed a clause and alternates that are substantially the same as those at 52.204-2, the contracting officer shall use the agency-prescribed clause as required by agency procedures.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 4.4 - Safeguarding Classified Information Within Industry
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Ellis Clanton, Appellant, v Harold J. Smith, as Superintendent of the Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The question of the timeliness of the preliminary hearing was not raised or considered at Special Term. (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming Supreme Court—habeas corpus.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Witmer and Moule, JJ.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:96-cr-00020-MP-AK-4

JOHN CALVIN EVERETT,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 559, Defendant's Motion for Leave to

Amend Doc. 556, his Motion for Reconsideration of the order at Doc. 555. That motion

for reconsideration has already been denied as without merit, and nothing in the motion

at Doc. 559 justifies revisiting the issues raised. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

The Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. 559) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of October, 2011. 

áBZtÜç eA ]ÉÇxá 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:96-cr-00020-MW-GRJ Document 561 Filed 10/27/11 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to
be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not
constitute a part of the annual report on Form 10-K (the Report) accompanying
this letter.

Kevin J. McAndrew, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc., certifies that:

1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Canterbury
Consulting Group, Inc. (as of and for the periods presented in the Report).


               /s/ Kevin J. McAndrew
               -----------------------------
               Kevin J. McAndrew
               President and Chief Executive Officer


               /s/ Kevin J. McAndrew
               -----------------------------
               Kevin J. McAndrew
               Chief Financial Officer


Date: June 3, 2005
Exhibit 22. List of Subsidiaries of Chell Group Corporation as at November 26,
2001

Name of Subsidiary(1)                              Jurisdiction of Incorporation
---------------------                              -----------------------------

Chell Merchant Capital Group, Inc................................Ontario
Magic Lantern Communications Ltd.(2) .............................Canada
NTN Interactive Network Inc.......................................Canada
3484751 Canada Inc................................................Canada
Sonoptic Technologies Inc.(4).....................................Canada
GalaVu Entertainment Network Inc. ...............................Ontario
TutorBuddy Inc.(3)...............................................Ontario
Chell.com (USA) Ltd...............................................Nevada

----------

Notes:

      (1)   Unless otherwise indicated, all named entities are wholly-owned
            subsidiaries of Chell Group Corporation.

      (2)   Wholly-owned subsidiary of NTN Interactive Network Inc.

      (3)   Wholly-owned subsidiary of Magic Lantern Communications Ltd.

      (4)   Majority owned (75%) subsidiary of Magic Lantern Communications Ltd.
**ALLONGE**

 

 

This Allonge is attached to the Promissory Note dated August 1, 2001 (the “Note”), in the principal amount of $10,080,000, made by Sunwood Village Joint Venture, Limited Partnership, a Nevada limited partnership, and payable to First Union National Bank, a national banking association.

 

|   | Pay to the order of East West Bank, a California banking corporation. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated:  April 23 2007 |
|-----------------------|

 

 

| EVEREST PROPERTIES II, LLC, aCalifornia limited liability company |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  

By:

 

 

                                |  

EVEREST PROPERTIES, LLC, aCalifornia limited liability company, itsManager |
|                                                                   | By:  | /S/ W. ROBERT KOHORST |
|                                                              |   | W. Robert Kohorst, President and Manager |

 

 

 

W:\Working\05904\88\W0057889.DOC v1
79-008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–732

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT

TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES COMMITTEE

JULY 13, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 550]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 550, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to a special rule reported on the legislative day of July 17, 2000, providing for consideration or disposition of any Senate amendments to H.R. 4810, the

Marriage Penalty Tax Elimination Reconciliation Act of 2000.

Æ
3.909-2 Representation by the offeror.

(a) In order to be eligible for contract award, an offeror must represent that it will not require its

employees or subcontractors to sign internal confidentiality agreements or statements prohibiting or

otherwise restricting such employees or subcontractors from lawfully reporting waste, fraud, or

abuse related to the performance of a Government contract to a designated investigative or law

enforcement representative of a Federal department or agency authorized to receive such

information (e.g., agency Office of the Inspector General). Any offeror that does not so represent is

ineligible for award of a contract.

(b) The contracting officer may rely on an offeror's representation unless the contracting officer has

reason to question the representation.

Parent topic: 3.909 Prohibition on providing funds to an entity that requires certain internal

confidentiality agreements or statements.
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 4:19cv488-RH-MJF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JAMAAL BERNARD KING,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:19cv488-RH-MJF

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART

The plaintiff Jamaal Bernard King is a prisoner in the Florida Department of 

Corrections. He alleges the Department and two of its contracted medical providers

failed to respond properly to his serious medical needs. One of the contracted 

medical providers, Centurion of Florida, LLC, moved for judgment on the 

pleadings. The order of October 13, 2020 granted the motion in part. 

First, the order dismissed Mr. King’s federal-law claims against Centurion.

Second, as to the state-law claims, the order converted the motion for judgment on 

the pleadings into a summary-judgment motion and required Mr. King to respond.

Case 4:19-cv-00488-RH-MJF Document 66 Filed 11/05/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:19cv488-RH-MJF

Mr. King now has responded, acknowledging that Centurion is entitled to 

summary judgment on the state-law claims. This is correct for the reasons set out 

in the October 13 order. This order thus grants summary judgment. And because 

this disposes of the only remaining claims against Centurion, I expressly determine 

that there is no just reason for delay and direct the clerk to enter judgment.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Summary judgment is granted for Centurion on Mr. King’s claims arising 

under state law.

2. The clerk must enter judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

54(b) stating, “The claims against the defendant Centurion of Florida, LLC were 

resolved on a motion for judgment on the pleadings as partly deemed a summaryjudgment motion. It is adjudged that the plaintiff Jamaal Bernard King recover 

nothing on his claims against Centurion. The claims against Centurion are 

dismissed with prejudice.” 

SO ORDERED on November 5, 2020.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:19-cv-00488-RH-MJF Document 66 Filed 11/05/20 Page 2 of 2
98-980.

#### State v. Campbell.

Franklin C.P. No. 97CR042020. On motion to provide transcript at state expense. Motion granted.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.
No. 89-6642.

#### Doolan *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 3560.256 Rental assistance payments. ( a ) *Borrower submission requirements.* The borrower must submit monthly requests for RA payments to the Agency based on occupancy as of the first day of the month previous to the month in which the request is being made.
( b ) *Basis of RA requests.* Borrower requests for RA payments must be based on the difference between the basic rent plus utility allowances for each rental unit eligible for RA and the net tenant contribution of the tenant.
( c ) *Payments to borrower.* Prior to making RA payments to a borrower, the Agency will deduct from the approved RA payment amount any unpaid loan payments, late fees, and other amounts which the borrower owes to the Agency.
( d ) *Utility payments to tenants.* The borrower must pay tenants the difference between the utility allowance and the tenant's net contribution to rent when a tenant receiving RA is billed directly for utilities and the utility allowance exceeds the net tenant contribution to rent. Such utility payments to tenants must be made on a monthly basis.
( e ) *Administrative errors.* Borrowers are responsible for correcting borrower errors made in regard to RA requests for payments. In accordance with subpart O of this part, borrowers will be required to repay the Agency for any unauthorized RA received or any unauthorized use of RA except in certain cases of tenant error or fraud.
§ 3560.705 Recapture of unauthorized assistance. ( a ) The Agency will seek repayment of all unauthorized assistance received by a borrower or tenant, plus the cost of collection, to the fullest extent permitted by law. Agency efforts to collect unauthorized assistance may include offsets, the use of private or public collection agents, and any other remedies available. Agency findings related to unauthorized assistance determinations will be referred to credit reporting bureaus and other federal, state, or local agencies with jurisdictions related to the unauthorized assistance findings for suspension, debarment, civil or criminal action to the fullest extent permitted by law.
( b ) If a borrower or tenant agrees to repay unauthorized assistance, the amount due will be the amount stated in the unauthorized assistance determination notice unless another amount has been approved by the Agency.
( c ) Repayment may be made either with a lump sum payment or through payments made over a period of time. If a borrower or tenant agrees to repay unauthorized assistance, the borrower or tenant proposed repayment schedule must be approved by Agency prior to implementation. Agency approval of a repayment schedule will take into consideration the best interest of the borrower, the tenant, and the Federal Government.
( d ) Borrowers must retain copies of all correspondence and a record of all conversations between the borrower and a tenant regarding unauthorized assistance received by a tenant.
( e ) When a tenant, who has received unauthorized assistance due to tenant error or fraud as determined by the Agency, moves out of a housing project, the borrower is no longer responsible for recapturing the unauthorized assistance provided that the borrower notifies the Agency of the tenant's move and transfers all records related to the tenant's unauthorized assistance to the Agency within 30 days of the tenant's move. The Agency will pursue collection of the unauthorized assistance from the tenant.
( f ) If a borrower refuses to enter into an unauthorized assistance repayment schedule with the Agency, the Agency will initiate liquidation procedures, in accordance with § 3560.456, or other enforcement actions, such as suspension, debarment, civil, or criminal penalties, in accordance with § 3560.461. If a tenant refuses to enter into an unauthorized assistance repayment schedule, the Agency will initiate recovery actions against the tenant.
( g ) Borrowers may not use housing project funds to pay amounts due to the Agency as a result of unauthorized assistance due to borrower fraud.
#### § 29.39 Permissive inspection.

Inspection authorized under section 6 of the Act.
WE/12/24/2014 Corporate Offices Alaska Airlines, Ben Minicucci, COO, Brad Tilden, CEO P.O. Box 68900 Seattle, WA 98168 206-433-3200 Horizon ,Air, David 

### L. Campbell, President & COO; Gene Hahn, Senior V-P, Operations, Bradley Tilden, CEO P.O. Box 68977 Seattle, WA 98168 206-241-6757 Per our local TV news see link below... Changes ahead for Del Norte County Airport CRESCENT CITY- It's no secret at this point. A new airline is looking to bring its services to the Del Norte Countyjirport. Alaska Air Group is in talks with airport staffand the Department ofTransportation about 

### the possibility of coming into the Crescent City hub. Currently Sky West provides service to the ail-port, but that contract ends in 

### 2015. Jill-port :Lvfanager J\1atthcw Leitner says air service providers have untilJanuary 1') to "U.bt'·"ll·.,..

**p-O"j"J(J"S·"t:~ '1**  **1~-lf-). ~.,** . .,.. - ,. **·---~~--. ~-1·!:··.-n**  L.? ..·,::_·,

**.~()** J.·::·-,-:>.·. ·,,c<"_·l

**-:.:.~-:.7't-")!J".l1** 1·n._

**(~** .. n. • . v 1 L JL . , < ,,_,,

**~** •'-· •.

**Ut!l~,** llii.LIL_Y

**.~.,** •• •• , - v ,_,,._ • , . •• -·o" ,.. . '-' the possibility of"'\laska Air or another air service coming in. Another future change the airnort is considcrinz

**i~; movin~t**  the connection hub from San L

**~ {.~**  ') Francisco to Portland, Oregon. 

### So,. 

## if yoN have tlvo El11B-120JjJer 

### dqy RTSFO/ CEC, JP.i:'/J 

### half the seats empty, and!eJs demand 

### for a flight north them

**ajl~gJ;t** 

### Jotrth, taApt:t;JerJ are

### ,going 

### to be sttdfing a lot 

## rif cash iJZto the empty seats 

## rif a 76-sealn: DoJtblt d.it:rl 

### !fthere are l7Pojllcgl1iJ'jJCr dqy. This isgoing to be one exne1ui1;e 

### E_,-'15 contract. 

### Om:

**!Jom~~;** 

### cmd luJet:tv minNtes, 

### 76 mi!e.r to

### ACV 2 r J • I 

### l 

### fi . 110 ., "1 '' . - 

### h / T't 0 0 l 

### nottrs am;. zve JJ1mtttes, mtteJ to Ndi1/or:i cln? citrborts t

### _at arc nedrt'J1!. 

### ,)zs azrport !Jas· .../ J ! j'

### not completedit runwqy sqfe!J areaprqject that is reqttired

# ry the FAA. Ata minimttm, yottr

### Q is likefy to run 80% empty. Horizon**~lir** 

### woztld haz.•e to set up a station,presumabfy with all the e_'x:jJense C!fa manager, e:mplqyees and eqttipmmtjor v.Jhat, atmost, two flightsper dqy. By the wq_y, there is a large obstruction**~ff.rhore** 

### t!/tl?i.r airport. c F 

### A4's Susan Kurland, /lssistant Secretary forAviation, DOT/OST 1200 NewJersry Ave. SE, Washington 

### DC20590 Sincere thanks,

# RickO~ PO Box506 Bltte Lake, CA 95525-0506
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:90-cr-01036-MP

ROBERT REE SMITH,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 374, Mr. Smith's motion to alter the order entered

at Doc. 372. Nothing in the motion justifies altering the conclusion that Mr. Smith's previous

motion was an attempt to file a successive § 2255 petition. Accordingly, the Order at doc. 372

should not be altered, and the motion to alter, Doc. 374, is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of June, 2006

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:90-cr-01036-MP-GRJ Document 375 Filed 06/21/06 Page 1 of 1