alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT MICHAEL MCDONALD,

Inmate No. 00030838,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5388/LAC/EMT

GRAHAM FOUNTAIN, et al.,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on January

21, 2021 (ECF No. 53). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.

53) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-05388-LC-EMT Document 66 Filed 12/07/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. Plaintiff’s “Emergency Motion for an [sic] Restrictive Injunction”

(ECF No. 36) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of December, 2021.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 3:20cv5388/LAC/EMT

Case 3:20-cv-05388-LC-EMT Document 66 Filed 12/07/21 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Wayne Holley, Individually and on Behalf of His Wife Gayle Holley, and His Minor Children, Robert Holley et al., Respondent, v Barbara Blum, Individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Appellants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners-respondents, a family of five (Wayne Holley, his wife Gayle Holley and their children) reside in the same household with the four McQuoid children (offspring of Gayle by a previous marriage). The Holleys receive Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance (OASDI) benefits from the United States Social Security Administration. The McQuoids are recipients of New York State public assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program. The Holleys sought to qualify for medically indigent Medicaid under section 366 (subd 2, par [a]) of the Social Services Law. In determining the "spend-down” amount (i.e., the amount of medical expenses that the Holleys would have to pay each month from their own income before they could look to Medicaid for reimbursement) appellants computed the amount of the Holley income exemption under section 366 (subd 2, par [a], cl [8], subcl [i]) of the Social Services Law by considering their household to be composed of nine family members (i.e., the five Holleys and the four McQuoids) and "pro-rating” the exemption to a household of five. As stated in the memorandum at Special Term this was error. *Matter of Padilla v Wyman*(34 NY2d 36, app dsmd 419 US 1084), relied upon by the appellants, is inapplicable (see *Swift v Toia,*450 F Supp 983, 990). The Holleys, as recipients of Federal OASDI payments, are not on public assistance (see *Leone v Blum,*73 AD2d 252). Nor can they, as persons seeking to be qualified as medically indigent under section 366 (subd 2, par [a], cl [8], subcl [i]) of the Social Services Law in order to be able to obtain reimbursement in *999the event of excess expenditures for medical costs, be considered recipients of public assistance so as to come within the *Padilla*rationale; i.e., that in a "multiperson household the per capita costs of many items, since they are shared, will be less.” *(Matter of Padilla v Wyman, supra,*p 40). There is no reason to believe that the medical needs of a person who lives in a nine-member household will be any less than the needs of a person who lives alone. The petition alleges violations of the United States Constitution, the Social Security Act and the Federal regulations promulgated thereunder, and Special Term could have based its decision on such violations (see *Swift v Toia,*461 F Supp 578, 583, affd 598 F2d 312). The award of counsel fees pursuant to section 1988 of title 42 of the United States Code was, therefore, proper (see *Matter of McNeil v Shang,*69 AD2d 985; *Matter of Ashley v Curtis,*67 AD2d 828; *Young v Toia,*66 AD2d 377). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court—CPLR art 78.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
| CERTIFICATION                PURSUANT TO                                    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 18                U.S.C. SECTION 1350                                       |
| AS                ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                       |
| SECTION                906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF                2002 |

| 1.     | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| 2.     | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| Date:                May 19, 2008                                                                            |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                         |   |   |   |
| /s/                Robert Ellin                                                                              |   |   |   |
| Robert                Ellin, President and Chief Executive OfficerPrincipal                Executive Officer |   |   |   |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 16, 2010.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:

                    1.                     *FA Capital, LLC, and Community Bank Investors of America, L.P.,*                     both of Richmond, Virginia; to retain 9.86 percent of the voting shares of ICB Financial, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Inland Community Bank, N.A., both of Ontario, California.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 16, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-29268 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO STATEMENT OF WORK 
 TO: TERRESTAR NETWORKS 
 DOCUMENT ID: P07009S0WOIR08 Amendment_No_l, AMENDING DOCUMENT ID P07009S0WOIR08 
 DATE: JANUARY 22, 2008 







 1. INTRODUCTION 
 Elektrobit inc. (“EB”) and TerreStar Networks Inc. (“TerreStar”) are parties to a statement of work dated September 19, 2007 (Document No. P07009S0W01R08, hereinafter the SOW) that defines the
scope of technical work to be performed by EB for development of two core engines and two reference phones for TerreStar’s innovative hybrid terrestrial-satellite network. The work is governed by terms and conditions set forth in the Master
Development and Licensing Agreement between the parties, as amended. 
 The parties desire to amend the SOW to include as an additional task
of the project described in the SOW, the development of User Interface Definitions, and to add to the parties’ respective responsibilities certain related deliverables, all as hereinafter set forth. 
 2. AMENDMENTS TO SOW 
 The SOW is hereby amended,
effective the date set forth on the cover page, as follows: 
 A. Section 2, “PROJECT OVERVIEW,” is amended by adding the following at the end
thereof: 
 “2.8 User Interface Definitions 
 The Project will include a User Interface (hereinafter “UI”) Definition phase. Ul will be developed for PDA/ Business Phone. UI Definition will consist of: 
  

	 	•	 	 a UI style guide, which describes in generic terms the look and feel of the UI, detailed UI elements of the product and the applications; and



  

	 	•	 	 a UI Plan, which describes how UI definition will be carried out in detail. 


 UI Plan will describe in detail the following, separately from the timelines, etc. for other aspects of the Project: 
  

	 	•	 	 worksplit between companies 


  

	 	•	 	 members of the team, and related roles and responsibilities 


  

	 	•	 	 contents of the documents 


  

	 	•	 	 implementation timelines 


  

	 	•	 	 review and approval processes and participants 


  

	 	•	 	 inputs 


  

	 	•	 	 deliverables.” 









 B. Appendix 2 is amended as follows: 
 (i) by the addition of the following at the end of Appendix 2A: 
  

							
	 Domain
	  	 TerreStar Furnished Item
	  	 Milestone
	  	 Responsible

	 DOCUMENTATION
	  	UI Requirements for PDA Phone Product Line	  	M1	  	TerreStar

 C. Appendix 3 is amended as follows: 
 (i) by the addition of the following at the end of Appendix 3A: 
  

							
	 Domain
	  	 TerreStar Furnished Item
	  	 Milestone
	  	 Responsible

	 DOCUMENTATION
	  	UI Plan	  	M1	  	Elektrobit
	 DOCUMENTATION
	  	UI Style Guide for PDA Product Line	  	M1	  	Elektrobit

 3. STATUS OF SOW. Except as specifically amended, the SOW remains in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have duly executed this Amendment NO.1 to 
 [SIGNATURES FOLLOW] 







 SOW as of the date set forth on the cover page above. 
  

			
	TERRESTAR NETWORKS INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Steve Aubuchon

	Name:	 	Steve Aubuchon
	Title:	 	VP Product Management
	Date:	 	February 8, 2008
	
	ELEKTROBIT, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Veli-Matti Ihme

	Name:	 	Veli-Matti Ihme
	Title:	 	VP, Global Manager
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


The undersigned, Keith G. LeBlanc, President and Chief Executive Officer of
SurgiCare, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certifies that:

(1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  September 2, 2004

By:        /s/ Keith G. LeBlanc
           --------------------
           Keith G. LeBlanc, Chief Executive Officer



                                       28
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03497**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03497\03497_Checklist_110510_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03497\03497_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03497\03497_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03497\03497_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03497\03497_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03497\03497_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03497\Certification Statement Plant ID 03497.pdf Plant certification statement x 03497\Supplemental Documents\A5.2_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03497\Supplemental Documents\A5.2_MAP-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03497\Supplemental Documents\A5.3_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03497\Supplemental Documents\cover letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 510
[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0002]
 AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
 ACTION: Final rule.
 SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal drug regulations to reflect a change of sponsor's name from Belcher Pharmaceuticals, Inc., to Belcher Pharmaceuticals, LLC. The sponsor's mailing address will also be changed.
 DATES: This rule is effective November 26, 2010.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven D. Vaughn, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV-100), Food and Drug Administration, 7520 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855; 240-276-8300, e-mail: 
                        *steven.vaughn@fda.hhs.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Belcher Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 12393 Belcher Rd., suite 420, Largo, FL 33773 has informed FDA that it has changed its name and address to Belcher Pharmaceuticals, LLC, 6911 Bryan Dairy Rd., Largo, FL 33777. Accordingly, the Agency is amending the regulations in 21 CFR 510.600 to reflect this change. This rule does not meet the definition of “rule” in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because it is a rule of “particular applicability.” Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements in 5 U.S.C. 801-808. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 510 Administrative practice and procedure
Animal drugs
Labeling
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
 Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 510 is amended as follows: PART 510—NEW ANIMAL DRUGS
 1.The authority citation for 21 CFR part 510 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                        21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 360b, 371, 379e. 2.In § 510.600, in the table in paragraph (c)(1), revise the entry for “Belcher Pharmaceuticals, Inc.”; and in the table in paragraph (c)(2), revise the entry for “062250” to read as follows: § 510.600
  
 (c) * * * (1) * * * Firm name and address
Drug labeler code*    *    *    *    *Belcher Pharmaceuticals, LLC, 6911 Bryan Dairy Rd., Largo, FL 33777
062250*    *    *    *    *
 (2) * * * Drug labeler code
Firm name and address*    *    *    *    *062250
Belcher Pharmaceuticals, LLC, 6911 Bryan Dairy Rd., Largo, FL 33777.*    *    *    *    *
 Dated: November 19, 2010. Elizabeth Rettie, Deputy Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine.


[FR Doc. 2010-29693 Filed 11-24-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NITAR TECH CORP. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Luiz Augusto
Brasil, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that;

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/S/ LUIZ AUGUSTO BRASIL
-----------------------
Name: Luiz Augusto Brasil
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 26, 2007
#### § 3560.3 Environmental review requirements.

RHS will consider environmental impacts of proposed housing as equal with economic, social, and other factors. By working with applicants, Federal agencies, Indian tribes, state and local governments, interested citizens, and organizations, RHS will formulate actions that advance program goals in a manner that protects, enhances, and restores environmental quality. Actions taken under this part must comply with the environmental review requirements in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970. Servicing actions as defined in § 1970.6 of this title are part of financial assistance already provided and do not require additional NEPA review. However, certain post-financial assistance actions that have the potential to have an effect on the environment, such as lien subordinations, sale or lease of Agency-owned real property, or approval of a substantial change in the scope of a project, as defined in § 1970.8 of this title, are actions for the purposes of this part.

[81 FR 11049, Mar. 2, 2016]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2363 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2363

 To extend the educational flexibility program under section 4 of the 
             Education Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2006

    Mr. Burr (for himself, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Allard, Mr. 
   Salazar, Mr. Carper, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. 
     Kerry, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Specter, Mr. Cornyn, Mrs. 
  Hutchison, Mr. Wyden, and Mr. Frist) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the educational flexibility program under section 4 of the 
             Education Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EDUCATIONAL FLEXIBILITY PROGRAM EXTENSION.

    (a) Extension Authority.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the Secretary of Education is authorized to carry out the 
educational flexibility program under section 4 of the Education 
Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999 (20 U.S.C. 5891b), until the date 
of enactment of an Act that reauthorizes programs under part A of title 
I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311 
et seq.), for any State that was an Ed-Flex Partnership State on 
September 30, 2004.
    (b) Designation.--
            (1) In general.--Any designation of a State as an Ed-Flex 
        Partnership State that was in effect on September 30, 2004, 
        shall be extended until the date of enactment of an Act that 
        reauthorizes programs under part A of title I of the Elementary 
        and Secondary Education Act of 1965, if the Secretary of 
        Education makes the determination described in paragraph (2).
            (2) Determination.--The determination referred to in 
        paragraph (1) is a determination that the performance of the 
        State educational agency, in carrying out the programs for 
        which the State has received a waiver under the educational 
        flexibility program, justifies the extension of the 
        designation.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2022092EN.01009801.xml

| 21.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 92/98 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 92/98

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/2148 of 8 October 2020 amending Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 as regards runway safety and aeronautical data

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 428 of 18 December 2020
  )

On page 26, in the Annex, point (3)(j), in the amendment to point ADR.OPS.B.016(c) of Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 139/2014:

for:

| ‘(c) | collect and analyse data and information to identify FOD sources and trends, and implement corrective or preventive measures, or both, to improve the effectiveness of the programme.’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(c)

collect and analyse data and information to identify FOD sources and trends, and implement corrective or preventive measures, or both, to improve the effectiveness of the programme.’,

read:

| ‘(4) | collect and analyse data and information to identify FOD sources and trends, and implement corrective or preventive measures, or both, to improve the effectiveness of the programme.’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(4)

collect and analyse data and information to identify FOD sources and trends, and implement corrective or preventive measures, or both, to improve the effectiveness of the programme.’.

---