alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
3.909-3 Solicitation provision and contract clause.       When using funding subject to the prohibitions in 3.909-1(a), the contracting officer shall-                                       (a)                                                         (1)                          								                Include the provision at 52.203-18, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements-Representation, in all solicitations, except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section; and                                                            (2)                          								                Do not insert the provision in solicitations for a personal services contract with an individual if the services are to be performed entirely by the individual, rather than by an employee of the contractor or a subcontractor.                                                                             (b)                                                         (1)                          								                Include the clause at 52.203-19, Prohibition on Requiring Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements, in all solicitations and resultant contracts, other than personal services contracts with individuals.                                                            (2)                          								                Modify existing contracts, other than personal services contracts with individuals, to include the clause before obligating FY 2015 or subsequent FY funds that are subject to the same prohibition on internal confidentiality agreements or statements.    **Parent topic:** 3.909 Prohibition on providing funds to an entity that requires certain internal confidentiality agreements or statements.
#### § 29.6007 Clean.

Tobacco is described as clean when it contains only a normal amount of sand or soil particles. Leaves grown on the lower portion of the stalk normally contain more sand or dirt than those from higher stalk positions. (See Rule 4.)
Santa Barbara County Rule 206 206 - 1 October 15, 1991

RULE 206. CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT OR PERMIT TO

OPERATE. (Adopted 10/18/1971, revised 5/1/1972, readopted 10/23/1978, revised

10/15/1991)

The Control Officer may issue an Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate to any new, modified, or

reevaluated source for which a permit is required, subject to specified written conditions. Such conditions are

for the purpose of ensuring that construction and operation of the source complies with all applicable local,

state, and federal air quality laws, rules, and regulations. This includes, but is not limited to, Section 44382 of

the Health and Safety Code. Commencing construction or operation under such an Authority to Construct or

Permit to Operate shall be deemed acceptance of all the specified conditions. The Control Officer shall issue a

new Permit to Operate with revised conditions upon receipt of an application, if the applicant demonstrates that

the source can operate in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal air quality laws, rules and

regulations. Failure to comply with any condition specified pursuant to the provisions of this rule shall be a

violation of this rule as well as of the applicable section of the Health and Safety Code.
(April 10, 1980)

#### Theodore Hosa, Also Known as Theodore Hosa, Sr., Appellant, v State of New York et al., Respondents. Theodore Hosa, Also Known as Theodore Hosa, Jr., Appellant, v State of New York et al., Respondents.

(Claim No. 61787.)

(Claim No. 61788.)

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims, entered May 3, 1978, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss both claims herein upon the ground that they fail to state a cause of action. The claimants in these actions are a father and his son, and at approximately 7:15 p.m. on February 27, 1976 they were injured when the car in which they were traveling collided with a car driven by one James Tucci on State Route 28 in the Town of Olive, Ulster County. As a result, claimants instituted the present actions, wherein they allege that defendant State of New York and defendant New York State Thruway Authority negligently caused the subject accident by failing to stop the Tucci vehicle from proceeding further after it had stopped at the Kingston toll booth while exiting from the Thruway just prior to the accident. Basically, claimants contend that the toll booth attendants on duty knew, or should have known, of Tucci’s intoxicated condition as he left the Thruway and, therefore, should have detained his vehicle. Instead, Tucci was allowed to proceed, and the accident thereafter occurred on Route 28 approximately four miles west of the Kingston Toll Plaza. Subsequently, in the Court of Claims, defendants moved to dismiss the claims for failure to state a cause of action, and their motion was granted. These appeals followed. Seeking a reversal of the order of dismissal, claimants do not now dispute the dismissal of the claims against the State of New York, but argue solely that they are entitled to a trial on the factual issues involved with their claims against the Thruway Authority. We find, however, that the claims against the Thruway Authority were likewise properly dismissed. When the mishap in question occurred, claimants were not even using the Thruway, and clearly no special relationship existed between them and the Thruway Authority so as to impose upon the Authority a duty to protect them from the actions of third-party drivers such as Tucci. We hold that, under the circumstances of this case, the Thruway Authority owed a general duty to the public but not a special duty to claimants to control Tucci’s actions *(Burchins v State of New York,*46 AD2d 705, affd 39 NY2d 954; *Evers v Westerberg,*38 AD2d 751, affd 32 NY2d 684). In conclusion, we would also note on the issue of control that, even though Tucci allegedly stopped at the Kingston Toll Plaza for 20 minutes before proceeding onward, there is nothing in the record to indicate that the Authority in any way attempted to control his actions so as to be chargeable with a special duty to care for him (see *Parvi v City of Kingston,*41 NY2d 553). Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
§ 4279.132 Personal and corporate guarantees. ( a ) Full, unconditional personal and/or corporate guarantees for the full term of the loan are required from those owning 20 percent or more interest in the borrower, where legally permissible, unless the Agency grants an exception. The Agency may grant an exception for existing businesses only when the lender requests it and documents to the Agency's satisfaction that collateral, equity, cash flow and profitability indicate an above-average ability to repay the loan. Partial guarantees for the full term of the loan at least equal to each owner's percentage of interest in the borrower times the loan amount may be required in lieu of full, unconditional guarantees when the guarantors' percentages equal 100 percent so that the loan is fully guaranteed.
( b ) When warranted by an Agency assessment of potential financial risk, the Agency may require the following: ( 1 ) Guarantees to be secured;
( 2 ) Guarantees of parent, subsidiaries, or affiliated companies owning less than a 20 percent interest in the borrower; and
( 3 ) Guarantees from persons whose ownership interest in the borrower is held indirectly through intermediate entities.
( c ) All personal and corporate guarantors must execute Form RD 4279-14, “Unconditional Guarantee,” and any guarantee form required by the lender. The Agency will retain the original, executed Form RD 4279-14. ( 1 ) Any amounts paid by the Agency on behalf of an Agency guaranteed loan borrower will constitute a Federal debt owed to the Agency by the guaranteed loan borrower.
( 2 ) Any amounts paid by the Agency pursuant to a claim by a guaranteed program lender will constitute a Federal debt owed to the Agency by a guarantor of the loan, to the extent of the amount of the guarantor's guarantee.
( 3 ) In all instances under paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section, interest charges will be assessed in accordance with 7 CFR 1951.133.
p120406.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0406

Focus Ready Draft 7/9/2012

ENGINEER: Arnold \ BCS

 

 

 

 

 ppm

Page 1
p120406.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

Page 2
p120406.eng

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0406

 

 

Page 3

p120406.eng

 

Page 5
p120406.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0406

 

Page 6
p120406.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0406

 

Page 7
p120406.eng

 

 

Page 8

p120406.eng

 

 

 

 

Page 10
p120406.eng

Page 11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Estes, 7:20cv137

Hacker, 7:20cv131

Keefer, 7:20cv104

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

EXHIBITS ORDER NO. 6

This Order addresses Plaintiffs’ objections to several exhibits identified on 

Defendants’ fourth priority exhibit list submitted to the Court on April 11, 2021. 

The Court’s rulings are set forth in the attached Exhibit 1. 

SO ORDERED, on this 16th day of April, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00137-MCR-GRJ Document 157 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 1
#### § 29.9403 Flue-Cured Tobacco Advisory Committee.

To assist the Secretary in making the apportionment and assignment of inspectors, a Flue-Cured Tobacco Advisory Committee, appointed in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. appendix I), shall advise and recommend to the Secretary marketing area opening dates and selling schedules for both designated and undesignated flue-cured tobacco to be sold in each marketing area and in each warehouse within each marketing area.

[39 FR 30475, Aug. 23, 1974, as amended at 49 FR 4067, Feb. 2, 1984; 50 FR 45806, Nov. 4, 1985; 51 FR 5987, Feb. 19, 1986; 67 FR 61468, Oct. 1, 2002]
3:19-cr-117/TKW

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 3:19-cr-117/TKW

ALBERTO LEIBA

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. 

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts One and Two of the 

indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning 

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined the guilty plea was knowing 

and voluntary and the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact 

containing each of the essential elements thereof. I therefore recommend the plea 

of guilty be accepted and the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence 

imposed accordingly.

Dated: December 6, 2019.

/s/ Hope Thai Cannon HOPE THAI CANNON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
3:19-cr-117/TKW

Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed 

within twenty-four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different 

deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use 

only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the 

magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a magistrate 

judge's findings or recommendations contained in a report and 

recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 

waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on 

unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir. Rule 

3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  26  LLC  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ended
September  30,  2010, as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              November 10, 2010



                          /s/ PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              November 10, 2010
§ 3565.451 Preclaim requirements. ( a ) *Lender certifications.* After borrower default and before filing a claim or assignment of the loan to the Agency, the lender must make every reasonable and prudent effort to resolve the default. The lender must provide the Agency with an accounting of all proposed and actual actions taken to cure the default. The lender must certify that all reasonable efforts to cure the default have been exhausted. Where the lender fails to comply with the terms of the loan guarantee agreement and the corresponding regulations and guidance with regard to liquidating the property, the Agency, at its option, may take possession of the security collateral and dispose of the property.
( b ) *Due diligence by lender.* For all loan servicing actions where a market, net recovery or liquidation value determination is required, guaranteed lenders shall perform due diligence in conjunction with the appraisal and submit it to the Agency for review. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment published by the American Society of Testing and Materials is considered an acceptable format for due diligence.
( c ) *Environmental review.* The Agency is required to complete an environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act, in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970. Servicing actions as defined in § 1970.6 are part of financial assistance already provided and do not require additional NEPA review. However, certain post-financial assistance actions that have the potential to have an effect on the environment, such as lien subordinations, sale or lease of Agency-owned real property, or approval of a substantial change in the scope of a project, as defined in § 1970.8, are subject to a NEPA analysis in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970.
[63 FR 39458, July 22, 1998, as amended at 81 FR 11050, Mar. 2, 2016]
#### § 3565.503 Repurchase.

Lenders and security Holders must comply with Ginnie Mae requirements regarding the repurchase of loans from pools backing Ginnie Mae guaranteed securities.
Order entered December 12 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 16 - 00209 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF L.E. M., A CHILD On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court

Da llas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 13 - 12693 - V



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s December 6, 2016 motion for extension of t ime to file appellant’s brief and request for assistance in obtaining findings of fact and conclusions of l aw.

We GRAN T appellant’s motion for extension to the extent that appellant’s brief shall be filed by December 30, 2016.

We DENY appellant’ s request for assistance in obtaining findings of f a ct and conclusions of l aw because the record shows appellant’s notice of pas t due findings of fact and conclusions of law was untimely. See T EX . R. C IV . P. 297

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7218

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PERCIVAL NORMAN FENTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief 

District Judge. (5:07-cr-00025-GEC-BWC-1; 5:11-cv-80354-GEC)

Submitted: November 17, 2011 Decided: November 23, 2011

Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Percival Norman Fenton, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia; Rick 

A. Mountcastle, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Percival Norman Fenton seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Fenton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay (AMA)

OCSPP 890.1100

Additional Information

22 May 2013
Spinal Curvature in X. tropicalis

2

A. Tadpoles that possessed straight tails and 

backbones were considered to be absent of 

scoliosis. 

B. A curvature of the tail that was posterior to 

the hips was classified as moderate. 

C. Severe scoliosis was present when there 

was curvature of the tail and backbone anterior 

to the hips which would be expected to be 

present even after absorption of the tail during 

metamorphosis. 

(From Olmstead et al., unpublished manuscript. USEPA ORD)
Normalization Approaches

3
Normalization Approaches

4
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2289 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase the per resident 

payment floor for direct graduate medical education payments under 

the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2006 

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase 

the per resident payment floor for direct graduate medical education payments under the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 2289 IS

1 SECTION 1. INCREASING TO 100 PERCENT OF THE LOCAL2 ITY ADJUSTED NATIONAL AVERAGE PER 

3 RESIDENT AMOUNT THE PAYMENT FLOOR 

4 FOR DIRECT GRADUATE MEDICAL EDU5 CATION PAYMENTS UNDER THE MEDICARE 

6 PROGRAM. 

7 Section 1886(h)(2)(D)(iii) of the Social Security Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)(2)(D)(iii)) is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘and for the cost reporting period beginning during fiscal 

10 year 2002 shall not be less than 85 percent’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘, for cost reporting periods beginning during or after fis12 cal year 2002 (and before fiscal year 2006) shall not be 

13 less than 85 percent, and for cost reporting periods begin14 ning during or after fiscal year 2006 shall not be less than 

15 100 percent’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Material Sciences Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Clifford
D. Nastas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



October 10, 2007By:

/s/ Clifford D. NastasClifford D. NastasChief Executive Officer


In connection with the Report, I, James M. Froisland, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief
Information Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



October 10, 2007By:

/s/ James M. FroislandJames M. FroislandSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Information Officer and Corporate Secretary