T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S AL VA DO R R UI Z MAGA NA , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 72031 A ge nc yN o. A 092- 034- 740 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y12, 2011 ** B e f o r e : S C H R O E D E R , A L A R C Ó N , an dL E A V Y , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . S al vado r Rui z M agana, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f M exi co, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew o f th e B o ar do f I m m ig ra ti o n A p p ea ls’ (“B IA ”) o rd ersu stain in g th e g o v ern m en t’ s appe a l f r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) gr antof c anc e l l a t i on of

r e m ova l . O ur j u r i s d i c t i o n i s g o v e rn e db y8 U. S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . We r e v i e w d e n o v o q u e s t i o n s o f l aw, 

# FI LED JU L 25 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 72031 2 an df o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e th e a g e n c y ’s f in d in g s o f

f a c t. B rezi l i en v. H

older , 569 F . 3d 403, 411 ( 9th C i r . 2009) . W e de nyi n part , and di s m i s s i n part , the pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. M a gana ’ s c ont e nt i on tha thi s c onvi c t i on f orvi ol a t i on of

C a l i f orni aH e a l th & S af ety C od e § 11 36 0(a) i s notcat egori ca l l y acontrol l ed subst ance offe nse und er 8 U . S . C . § 1227( a ) ( 2) ( B ) ( i ) i s f or e c l os e d byourde c i s i on i n Mi elew cz yk v. H older , 5 7 5 F .3 d9 9 2 , 9 9 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ( “[ O ]u rs ta te m e n t th a t ‘s o lic ita tio n is n o t a [ r e m o v ab le ] o f

f e n s e u n d e r[ 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 7 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ( i) ],’ ap p lie do n lyto vi ol a t i ons of

ge ne r i c s ol i c i t a t i on l aw s . ” ) ( c i t i ng Co r o n a do -D u ra z o v . I NS , 123 F . 3d 1 3 2 2 , 1 3 2 6 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 7 ) ) . C o n tr aryto M a g an a ’s c o n te n tio n s , th e B I A d idn o t e n g a g e in im p r o p e rf a c tfi nd i ng un der 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 1(d)(3)(i v), or vi ol at e the st andard of revi ew that g o v e rn s r e v ie w o f

th e I J ’s f

a c tu a l f in d in g s . See 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 1( d) ( 3) ( i ) . T he B I A ’s d e te rm in a tio n th a t M a g an a ’s e v id e n c e o f r e h ab ilita tio n w a s in s u f f ic ie n t to m er i tcancel l at i on of re m ov ali s adi sc re t i on ary det erm i nat i on thatw e l ac k ju r is d ic tio n to r e v ie w . See Mej i a v. G on zales , 499 F . 3d 991, 999 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ( s ta tin g th a t th e B I A ’s c o n s id e r a tio n o f a lie n ’s r e h ab ilita tio n f

a lls w ith in its d is c r e tio n aryau th o r ityan dis n o t s ub je c t to r e v ie w ) . P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D in p a r t ; D I S M I S S E D in p a r t .