alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 305.7 Quick freeze treatment requirements.

Quick freeze treatment for fruits and vegetables imported into the United States or moved interstate from Hawaii or Puerto Rico must be conducted in accordance with §§ 319.56-12 or 318.13-13, respectively, of this chapter. The PPQ Treatment Manual indicates fruits and vegetables for which quick freeze is an authorized treatment. Requests to authorize quick freeze as a treatment for other fruits and vegetables may be made in accordance with § 305.2(c).

[75 FR 4241, Jan. 26, 2010, as amended at 76 FR 60361, Sept. 29, 2011]
U.S. Fuel Ethanol Plant Production Capacity

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/dkorotne/My%20Documents/Capacity.htm[1/10/2013 1:00:34 PM]

U.S. Energy Information Administration - EIA - Independent Statistics and Analysis

PETROLEUM & OTHER LIQUIDS

OVERVIEW DATA ANALYSIS & PROJECTIONS GLOSSARY › FAQS ›

‹ SEE ALL PETROLEM REPORTS

U.S. Fuel Ethanol Plant Production Capacity

Release Date: May 30, 2012 | Next Release Date: May 2013 

Previous Issues

Year: 2012

About EIA Press Room Careers Feedback Contact Us

Topics

Analysis & Projections

Environment

Markets & Finance

Today in Energy

Geography

States

Countries

Maps

Tools

A-Z Index

All Reports

& Publications

EIA Survey Forms

Policies

Privacy/Security

Copyright & Reuse

Accessibility

Related Sites

U.S. Department of Energy

USA.gov

FedStats

Sources & Uses

Petroleum

Coal

Natural Gas

Renewable

Nuclear

Electricity

Consumption

Total Energy

Stay Connected

Facebook

Twitter

YouTube

Email Updates

RSS Feeds

Nameplate and Maximum Sustainable Ethanol Production Capacity January 2012

PAD

District

Number

of Plants

Nameplate

Capacity

Maximum

Sustainable

Capacity

Nameplate

Capacity

Maximum

Sustainable

Capacity

million gallons per year thousand barrels per day

PADD 1 4 316 323 21 21

PADD 2 172 12,488 13,050 815 851

PADD 3 6 449 453 29 30

PADD 4 5 190 216 12 14

PADD 5 7 285 279 19 18

U.S. Total 194 13,728 14,321 895 934

Nameplate Capacity: volume of denatured fuel ethanol that can be produced during a period of 12

months under normal operating conditions

Maximum Sustainable Capacity: annualized maximum denatured fuel ethanol production that can be

achieved over a period of any 6 consecutive months

Source: Form EIA-819M Monthly Oxygenate Report

Notice: Changes to Petroleum Supply Survey Forms for 2013

This is the second release of U.S. Energy Information Administration data on fuel ethanol production capacity. EIA first reported fuel ethanol production capacities for

January 2011 on November 29, 2011. This new report contains production capacity data for all operating U.S. fuel ethanol production plants as of January 1, 2012.
U.S. Fuel Ethanol Plant Production Capacity

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/dkorotne/My%20Documents/Capacity.htm[1/10/2013 1:00:34 PM]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RAY DONOVAN NEVELS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:20cv365-MW/MAF

GOV. RON DESANTIS, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation, ECF No. 14. Upon consideration, with no objections having 

been filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “This action is DISMISSED for 

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e)(2).” The Clerk shall further note on the docket that this cause was dismissed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on January 13, 2021.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00365-MW-MAF Document 16 Filed 01/13/21 Page 1 of 1
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: November 21, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Region 7, EPA

SUBJECT: June 18, 2014, Conference Call Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A conference call was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on June 18, 2014

to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The majority of the 

discussion centered on how goals were established for the states in Region 7: Iowa, Kansas, 

Missouri, and Nebraska. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on 

June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

EPA Region 7:

Rebecca Weber

Josh Tapp

Mark A. Smith

Ward Burns

Iowa Department of Natural Resources

Catharine Fitzsimmons

Kansas Department of Health and 

Environment

Rick Brunetti

Tom Gross

Missouri Department of Natural Resources 

Kyra Moore

Nebraska Department of Environmental 

Quality

Shelly Schneider
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29633]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7246]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Salvator Rosa: Bandits, Wilderness and Magic''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Salvator Rosa: Bandits, Wilderness and 
Magic'', imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, TX, from on or about December 12, 
2010, until on or about March 27, 2011, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: November 18, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-29633 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7167

SHONDELL M. FLETCHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WOMEN’S CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Medical, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Falcon B. Hawkins, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1663-4-11-B) Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 31, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shondell M. Fletcher, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Shondell M. Fletcher appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice and advised that failure to file specific written objections shall constitute a waiver of a party’s right to further judicial review, including appellate review. The magistrate judge also noted that “any written objections must specifically identify the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections are made and the basis for such objections.” Despite this warning, Fletcher failed to note specific objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 844-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see alsoOrpiano v. Johnson , 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982) (failure to file specific objections to particular conclusions in magistrate judge’s report, after being warned of consequences waives further review). Because Fletcher was warned of the consequences of failing to file specific objections and because she failed to specify the portions of the3 magistrate judge’s report to which she objected, we find that Fletcher has waived appellate review. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2310 

To repeal the requirement for 12 operational aircraft carriers within the 

Navy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2006 

Mr. WARNER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To repeal the requirement for 12 operational aircraft carriers 

within the Navy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR 12 OPER4 ATIONAL AIRCRAFT CARRIERS WITHIN THE 

5 NAVY. 

6 Section 5062 of title 10, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by striking subsection (b); and 
2 

•S 2310 IS 

1 (2) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as 

2 subsections (b) and (c), respectively. 

Æ
**Attachment C Fu**  **migant Reregistration Eligibility Decisions and Supporting Documents** Documents to support the reregistration or registration actions for the group of soil fumigants listed below can be found in the public docket at www.regulations.gov under the following docket numbers: Methyl bromide: EPA- HQ - OPP - 2005 - 0123 1,3 - dichloropropene: EPA- HQ - OPP - 2005 - 0124 Metam sodium/potassium: EPA- HQ - OPP - 2005 - 0125 Dazomet: EPA- HQ - OPP - 2005 - 0128 Chloropicrin: EPA- HQ - OPP - 2007 - 0350 Iodomethane: EPA- HQ - OPP - 2005 - 0252 Dimethyl disulfide (DMDS): EPA- HQ - OPP - 2007 - 0092
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-2013MN

_____________ William W. Swanson; * * Petitioner-Appellant, * * Thomas W. Bock; John Edward Allen; * Brian L. Reigstad; Alan A. Orfi; Harry * Gardner; Jeffrey A. Sebeck; Steven * Krusel; Charles W. Ware; Charles R. * Mitchell; Bruce Virgil Robinson; * Richard J. Kellogg; Jason Hart; Jeffrey * Appeal from the United States P. Hess; Brian J. Laramy; Lyf C. * District Court for the District Wildenberg; Kevin Lamont Howard, * of Minnesota. * Petitioners, * [UNPUBLISHED] * v. * * Frank Wood; Dennis Benson; Fred G. * Lafleur; Mary Hogan, of Minnesota * Department of Corrections, or their * successors, * * Respondents-Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: February 6, 1998

Filed: February 11, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________-2-

PER CURIAM. William W. Swanson appeals the district court' s denial of Swanson's petition for awrit of habeas corpus. Swanson contends corrections officers misconstrued th e state' s "good time" statute in violation of Swanson's constitutional rights. Havin g revi ewedthe record and the parties' submissions, we conclude the district court' s judgment was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 3201.36 Concrete and asphalt release fluids. ( a ) *Definition.* Products that are designed to provide a lubricating barrier between the composite surface materials (e.g., concrete or asphalt) and the container (e.g., wood or metal forms, truck beds, roller surfaces).
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 87 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than May 14, 2009, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased concrete and asphalt release fluids. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased concrete and asphalt release fluids.
[73 FR 27994, May 14, 2008]
Subpart 4.1 - Contract Execution

Parent topic: Part 4 - Administrative and Information Matters

4.101 Contracting officer’s signature.

Only contracting officers shall sign contracts on behalf of the United States. The contracting

officer’s name and official title shall be typed, stamped, or printed on the contract. The contracting

officer normally signs the contract after it has been signed by the contractor. The contracting officer

shall ensure that the signer(s) have authority to bind the contractor (see specific requirements in

4.102 of this subpart).

4.102 Contractor’s signature.

(a) Individuals. A contract with an individual shall be signed by that individual. A contract with an

individual doing business as a firm shall be signed by that individual, and the signature shall be

followed by the individual’s typed, stamped, or printed name and the words ", an individual doing

business as _________" [insert name of firm].

(b) Partnerships. A contract with a partnership shall be signed in the partnership name. Before

signing for the Government, the contracting officer shall obtain a list of all partners and ensure that

the individual(s) signing for the partnership have authority to bind the partnership.

(c) Corporations. A contract with a corporation shall be signed in the corporate name, followed by

the word "by" and the signature and title of the person authorized to sign. The contracting officer

shall ensure that the person signing for the corporation has authority to bind the corporation.

(d) Joint venturers. A contract with joint venturers may involve any combination of individuals,

partnerships, or corporations. The contract shall be signed by each participant in the joint venture in

the manner prescribed in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section for each type of participant.

When a corporation is participating, the contracting officer shall verify that the corporation is

authorized to participate in the joint venture.

(e) Agents. When an agent is to sign the contract, other than as stated in paragraphs (a) through (d)

of this section, the agent’s authorization to bind the principal must be established by evidence

satisfactory to the contracting officer.

4.103 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.204-1 Approval of Contract, in solicitations and

contracts if required by agency procedures.
§ 361.2 Preemption of State and local laws; general restrictions on the importation of seed and screenings. ( a ) The regulations in this part preempt State and local laws regarding seed and screenings imported into the United States while the seed and screenings are in foreign commerce. Seed and screenings imported for immediate distribution and sale to the consuming public remain in foreign commerce until sold to the ultimate consumer. The question of when foreign commerce ceases in other cases must be considered on a case-by-case basis.
( b ) No person shall import any agricultural seed, vegetable seed, or screenings into the United States unless the importation is in compliance with this part.
( c ) Any agricultural seed, vegetable seed, or screenings imported into the United States not in compliance with this part shall be subject to exportation, destruction, disposal, or any remedial measures that the Administrator determines are necessary to prevent the dissemination into the United States of noxious weeds.
( d ) Except as provided in § 361.7(b), and in addition to the permit requirements of § 319.37-5 of this chapter, coated or pelleted seed, or seed that is embedded in a substrate that obscures visibility may enter the United States only if each lot of seed is accompanied by an officially drawn and sealed sample of seed drawn from the lot before the seed was coated or pelleted. The sample must be drawn in a manner consistent with that described in § 361.5 of this part.
( e ) Except as provided in §§ 361.4(a)(3) and 361.7(c), screenings of all agricultural seed and vegetable seed are prohibited entry into the United States.
[62 FR 48460, Sept. 16, 1997, as amended at 74 FR 53400, Oct. 19, 2009; 79 FR 74594, Dec. 16, 2014; 83 FR 11867, Mar. 19, 2018]
Exhibit
31.2






CERTIFICATIONS




I, Keith
A. Greaves, the acting chief financial officer of O2 Secure Wireless, Inc.,
certify that:




(1) I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2009 of O2 Secure Wireless, Inc.;




(2) Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




(3) Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




(4) The
small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and




(5) The
small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.





/s/ Keith
A. Greaves
                                                               
..


Keith A.
Greaves, Chief Financial Officer





Date:
August 19, 2009
§ 322.24 Packaging of transit shipments. ( a ) Restricted organisms transiting the United States must be packaged in securely closed and completely enclosed containers that prevent the escape of organisms and the leakage of any contained materials. The container must be sufficiently strong and durable to prevent it from rupturing or breaking during shipment.
( b ) In addition to the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section, each pallet of cages containing honeybees transiting the United States must be covered by an escape-proof net that is secured to the pallet so that no honeybees can escape from underneath the net.
( c ) The outside of the package must be clearly marked with the contents of the transit shipment, *i.e.*, either “Live Bees,” “Bee Germ Plasm,” or “Live Bee Brood,” and the name of the exporting region.
Subpart 4.1 - Contract Execution    **Parent topic:** Part 4 - Administrative and Information Matters4.101 Contracting officer’s signature.       Only contracting officers shall sign contracts on behalf of the United States. The contracting officer’s name and official title shall be typed, stamped, or printed on the contract. The contracting officer normally signs the contract after it has been signed by the contractor. The contracting officer shall ensure that the signer(s) have authority to bind the contractor (see specific requirements in 4.102 of this subpart).4.102 Contractor’s signature.       (a)                   *Individuals*. A contract with an individual shall be signed by that individual. A contract with an individual doing business as a firm shall be signed by that individual, and the signature shall be followed by the individual’s typed, stamped, or printed name and the words ", an individual doing business as _________" [*insert name of firm*].                                          (b)                   *Partnerships*. A contract with a partnership shall be signed in the partnership name. Before signing for the Government, the contracting officer shall obtain a list of all partners and ensure that the individual(s) signing for the partnership have authority to bind the partnership.                                          (c)                   *Corporations*. A contract with a corporation shall be signed in the corporate name, followed by the word "by" and the signature and title of the person authorized to sign. The contracting officer shall ensure that the person signing for the corporation has authority to bind the corporation.                                          (d)                   *Joint venturers*. A contract with joint venturers may involve any combination of individuals, partnerships, or corporations. The contract shall be signed by each participant in the joint venture in the manner prescribed in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section for each type of participant. When a corporation is participating, the contracting officer shall verify that the corporation is authorized to participate in the joint venture.                                          (e)                   *Agents*. When an agent is to sign the contract, other than as stated in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, the agent’s authorization to bind the principal must be established by evidence satisfactory to the contracting officer.4.103 Contract clause.       The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.204-1 Approval of Contract, in solicitations and contracts if required by agency procedures.