# Patent

## Title
Maize chloroplast aldolase promoter compositions and methods for use thereof

## Abstract

The current invention provides the promoter of the Zea mays nuclear gene encoding chloroplast-localized fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (F16BP) aldolase. Compositions comprising this sequence are described, as are plants transformed with such compositions. Further provided are methods for the expression of transgenes in plants comprising the use of these sequences. The methods of the invention include the direct creation of transgenic plants with the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter by genetic transformation, as well as by plant breeding methods. The sequences of the invention represent a valuable new tool for the creation of transgenic plants, preferably having one or more added beneficial characteristics.

## Background
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to transgenic plants. More specifically, it relates to methods and compositions for transgene expression using a promoter naturally associated with a Zea mays nuclear gene encoding a chloroplast localized fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase.
2. Description of the Related Art
An important aspect in the production of genetically engineered crops is obtaining sufficient levels of transgene expression in the appropriate plant tissues. In this respect, the selection of promoters for directing expression of a given transgene is crucial. Promoters which are useful for plant transgene expression include those that are inducible, viral, synthetic, constitutive as described (Paszkowski et al., 1984; Odell et al., 1985), temporally regulated, spatially regulated, and spatio-temporally regulated (Chau et al., 1989).
A number of plant promoters have been described with various expression characteristics. Examples of some constitutive promoters which have been described include the rice actin 1 (Wang et al., 1992; U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,876), CaMV 35S (Odell et al., 1985), CaMV 19S (Lawton et al., 1987), Ti plasmid nopaline synthase (nos, Ebert et al., 1987), alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh, Walker et al., 1987), and sucrose synthase (Yang and Russell, 1990).
Examples of tissue specific promoters which have been described include the lectin (Vodkin et al., 1983; Lindstrom et al., 1990), corn alcohol dehydrogenase 1 (Vogel et al., 1989; Dennis et al., 1984), corn light harvesting complex (Simpson, 1986; Bansal et al., 1992), corn heat shock protein (Odell et al., 1985; Rochester et al., 1986), pea small subunit RuBP carboxylase (Poulsen et al., 1986; Cashmore et al., 1983), Ti plasmid mannopine synthase (Langridge et al., 1989), Ti plasmid nopaline synthase (Langridge et al., 1989), petunia chalcone isomerase (Van Tunen et al., 1988), bean glycine rich protein 1 (Keller et al., 1989), truncated CaMV 35s (Odell et al., 1985), potato patatin (Wenzler et al., 1989), root cell (Conkling et al., 1990), maize zein (Reina et al., 1990; Kriz et al., 1987; Wandelt and Feix, 1989; Langridge and Feix, 1983; Reina et al., 1990), globulin-1 (Belanger and Kriz et al., 1991), α-tubulin (Carpenter et al., 1992; Uribe et al., 1998), cab (Sullivan et al., 1989), PEPCase (Hudspeth and Grula, 1989), R gene complex-associated promoters (Chandler et al., 1989), and chalcone synthase promoters (Franken et al., 1991).
Inducible promoters which have been described include ABA- and turgor-inducible promoters, the promoter of the auxin-binding protein gene (Schwob et al., 1993), the UDP glucose flavonoid glycosyl-transferase gene promoter (Ralston et al., 1988); the MPI proteinase inhibitor promoter (Cordero et al., 1994), and the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene promoter (Kohler et al., 1995; Quigley et al., 1989; Martinez et al., 1989).
Fructose-1,6-bisphospate (F16BP) aldolase (International Classification of Enzymes No. 4.1.2.13) is a gene which is expressed in an inducible constitutive manner in maize. This enzyme is essential in carbon metabolism and participates in the Calvin cycle, gluconeogenesis and glycolysis. F16BP aldolase catalyzes the conversion of fructose-1,6-bisphospate to dihydroxyacetone phosphate and 3-phosphoglyceraldehyde in a reversible manner. Antisense inhibition of potato aldolase activity has been found to result in a decrease in the rate of photosynthesis, a decrease in starch synthesis and an overall reduction in growth (Haake et al., 1998; Haake et al., 1999).
Two distinct classes of aldolases have been identified (Rutter 1964; Marsh and Lebherz, 1992; Gross et al., 1994; Pelzer-Reith et al., 1994). Class I aldolases are found predominantly in higher plants, animals, ferns, mosses and some eukaryotic algae. These aldolases function as tetramers and can be found in the cytoplasm or plastids, preferably chloroplasts, in the cell. The genes encoding aldolases localized to either the cytoplasm or the plastids, particularly the chloroplasts, are encoded by genes residing in the nuclear genome (Anderson and Levin, 1970; Lebherz et al., 1984; Kayaga et al., 1995). Herein, aldolases localized to the chloroplasts are referred to as chloroplastic aldolases. Class II aldolases are typically found in bacteria, cyanobacteria, fungi and some algae. Class II aldolases function as a dimer and can also be found in either the cytoplasm or plastids of the cell. The two classes of aldolases can be further distinguished as Class I types form a Schiff-base with the substrate and are not inhibited by EDTA; in contrast, Class II types do not form a Schiff-base and can be inhibited by EDTA (Rutter, 1964).
C3 and C4 plants differ greatly in their initial fixation of CO2 and in their physical compartmentalization of carbon metabolism. In the chloroplasts of C3 plants (such as rice), ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate is the acceptor molecule for CO2 and the 6 carbon intermediate is catalyzed to 2 molecules of 3-phosphoglycerate. Both carbon fixation and subsequent use of the products in the Calvin cycle is carried out in the chloroplasts of mesophyll cells. In contrast, C4 plants (such as maize) fix CO2 into four-carbon acids such as malate. The fixed carbon is then transported from the mesophyll cells into the bundle sheath cells which surround the vascular tissues. It is in the bundle sheath cells where the fixed CO2, carried as malate, is released and metabolized via the Calvin cycle. F16BP aldolase is an essential enzyme in the Calvin cycle in both C3 and C4 plants. However, since these two plant types vary significantly in their compartmentalization and regulation of carbon metabolism, it is unknown whether mechanisms regulating carbon metabolism will show similar control functions in C3 and C4 plants.
F16BP aldolases have been reported from a number of plant sources including spinach (Kruger and Schnarrenberger, 1983; Lebherz et al., 1984; Pelzer-Reith et al., 1993), potato (Haake et al., 1998; Haake et al., 1999), rice (Hidaka et al., 1990; Tsutsumi et al., 1994; Schaeffer et al., 1997), Arabidopsis (Chopra et al., 1990) and maize (Gasperini and Pupillo, 1982/3; Kruger and Schnarrenberger, 1983; Kelly and Tolan, 1986). The complexity of the aldolase encoding genes vary from versions with a single intron in maize (Dennis et al., 1988) to those with 5 introns in rice (Tsutusmi et al., 1994). The genes appear to be single to low copy in several species examined (Pelzer-Reith et al., 1993; Tsutsumi et al., 1994).
In rice, which is a C3 monocot, genomic clones for both the cytoplasmic and chloroplastic F16BP aldolases have been isolated (Hidaka et al., 1990; Tsutsumi et al., 1994; Nakamura et al., 1996). A published AldP chloroplast genomic sequence discloses 182 base pairs upstream of the initiating ATG (GenBank Accession number D13513; Tsutsumi et al., 1994). A published AldC-a cytoplasmic genomic sequence discloses 211 bp upstream of the initiating ATG (GenBank Accession number D13512; Tsutsumi et al., 1994). In young seedlings, aldolase was found to be induced by oxygen deprivation (Umeda and Uchimiya, 1994). The chloroplastic version of aldolase was found to be expressed mainly in the mesophyll cells in the leaf blade and to be light-responsive (Nakamura et al., 1997). When the rice chloroplastic aldolase promoter was fused with the uidA reporter gene and transformed into tobacco (a C3 dicot), GUS expression was found mainly in the leaves (Kayaga et al., 1995).
In maize, a C4 monocot, only the nuclear gene encoding the cytoplasmic form of F16BP aldolase has been cloned (Kelly and Tolan, 1986; Dennis et al., 1988) and this version of the enzyme has been localized to mesophyll cells (Taylor, 1989). Although the nuclear gene encoding the chloroplastic version of maize aldolase has not bee cloned, the protein product has been localized to the bundle sheath cells in leaves (Kruger and Schnarrenberger, 1983). Because of the marked differences in C3 and C4 carbon metabolism, it is unknown whether an aldolase promoter from a C4 type plant will show the same expression pattern or regulation as an aldolase promoter from a C3 type plant.
Although the above studies have provided a number of useful tools for the generation of transgenic plants, there is still a great need in the art for novel promoter sequences with beneficial expression characteristics. The number of effective promoters available for use with transgenes in maize is not abundant. New promoters, especially promoters that will express differentially in maize tissues, are spatially and/or temporally expressed, show proper regulation with regard to essential metabolic processes, or are induced to express by different environmental signals, would be useful. Such expression specific promoters could be useful in minimizing yield drag and other potential adverse physiological effects on maize growth and development that might be encountered by high-level, non-inducible, constitutive expression of a transgenic protein in a plant. A wider range of effective promoters also would make it possible to introduce multiple transgenes into a plant, each fused to a different promoter, thereby minimizing the risk of DNA sequence homology dependent transgene inactivation (co-suppression). Therefore, there is a great need in the art for the identification of novel inducible promoters which can be used for the high-level expression of selected transgenes in economically important crop plants.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one aspect, the invention provides an isolated nucleic acid comprising a maize chloroplast F16BP aldolase promoter. Still further provided by the invention is a maize chloroplast F16BP aldolase promoter isolatable from the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2. In particular embodiments, a maize chloroplast F16BP aldolase promoter in accordance with the invention may comprise from about 40 to about 1864, about 95 to about 1864, about 110 to about 1864, about 125 to about 1864, about 250 to about 1864, about 400 to about 1864, about 750 to about 1864, about 1000 to about 1864, about 1500 to about 1864, about 1750 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2, as well as all lengths of contiguous nucleotides within such sizes. In further embodiments, the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter may comprise the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.
An isolated nucleic acid comprising a maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter in accordance with the invention may further comprising an enhancer, for example, an intron. In one embodiment, the intron is a rice actin 1 intron 1 or a rice actin 2 intron 1. The isolated nucleic acid may further comprise a terminator, such as a nos terminator.
In another aspect, the invention provides a transgenic plant stably transformed with a selected DNA comprising a maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter. In particular embodiments of the invention, the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter may comprise from about 40 to about 1864, about 95 to about 1864, about 110 to about 1864, about 125 to about 1864, about 250 to about 1864, about 400 to about 1864, about 750 to about 1864, about 1000 to about 1864, about 1500 to about 1864, about 1750 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2. In one embodiment of the invention, the chloroplastic aldolase F16BP promoter comprises the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.
The selected DNA may further comprise any additional desired sequences. In one embodiment of the invention, the selected DNA further comprises a selected heterologous coding region operably linked to the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter. Potentially any coding sequence could be employed with the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, including a selected coding region which encodes a protein imparting insect resistance, bacterial disease resistance, fungal disease resistance, viral disease resistance, nematode disease resistance, herbicide resistance, enhanced grain composition or quality, enhanced nutrient utilization, enhanced environment or stress resistance, reduced mycotoxin contamination, male sterility, a selectable marker phenotype, a screenable marker phenotype, a negative selectable marker phenotype, or altered plant agronomic characteristics. Where the selected coding region encodes a protein imparting a selectable marker phenotype, the protein may be selected from, for example, the group consisting of phosphinothricin acetyltransferase, glyphosate resistant EPSPS, aminoglycoside phosphotransferase, hygromycin phosphotransferase, neomycin phosphotransferase, dalapon dehalogenase, bromoxynil resistant nitrilase, anthranilate synthase and glyphosate oxidoreductase. The selected coding region may be operably linked to a terminator, for example, a nos terminator. Benefit may also be realized by including an enhancer with the selected DNA. Examples of such an enhancer include the rice actin 1 intron 1 and rice actin 2 intron 1.
The selected DNA may further comprise DNA from a cloning vector, such as plasmid DNA, or alternatively, may have been introduced as an expression cassette isolated from such vector DNA. The selected DNA may also comprise a sequence encoding a signal peptide. Examples of signal peptides that could be used include a peroxisomal targeting peptide or a chloroplast transit peptide. Examples of a chloroplast transit peptide include the group consisting of chlorophyll a/b binding protein transit peptide, small subunit of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase transit peptide, EPSPS transit peptide and dihydrodipocolinic acid synthase transit peptide.
A transgenic plant comprising a selected DNA in accordance with the invention may be potentially any type of plant, including a monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous plant. Examples of monocotyledonous plants include wheat, maize, rye, rice, oat, barley, turfgrass, sorghum, millet and sugarcane. In one embodiment of the invention, the monocotyledonous plant is maize. Examples of dicotyledonous plants include tobacco, tomato, potato, soybean, cotton, canola, alfalfa, sunflower, and cotton. In one embodiment of the invention the dicotyledonous plant is a soybean plant. The transgenic plant prepared in accordance with the invention may be of any generation, including a fertile R0 transgenic plant as well as seeds thereof, wherein the seed comprises the selected DNA. Also included within the invention are progeny plants of any generation such a fertile R0 transgenic plant, wherein the progeny plant comprises said selected DNA, as well as seed of a progeny plant, wherein said seed comprises said selected DNA.
In yet another aspect, the invention provides a crossed fertile transgenic plant prepared according to the method comprising the steps of: (i) obtaining a fertile transgenic plant comprising a selected DNA comprising a maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, wherein the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter is isolatable from the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2; (ii) crossing the fertile transgenic plant with itself or with a second plant lacking said selected DNA to prepare the seed of a crossed fertile transgenic plant, wherein said seed comprises said selected DNA; and (iii) planting said seed to obtain a crossed fertile transgenic plant. The invention also includes a seed or seeds of such a crossed fertile transgenic plant, wherein said seed comprises said selected DNA. The crossed fertile transgenic plant may be potentially any type of plant, including a monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous plant. Examples of monocotyledonous plants include wheat, maize, rye, rice, oat, barley, turfgrass, sorghum, millet and sugarcane. In one embodiment of the invention, the monocotyledonous plant is maize. Examples of dicotyledonous plants include tobacco, tomato, potato, soybean, cotton, canola, alfalfa, sunflower, and cotton. In one embodiment of the invention the dicotyledonous plant is a soybean plant. The selected DNA may have been inherited through a parent used a male or a female at any given generation. In one embodiment of the invention, the second plant is an inbred plant. Where the second plant is an inbred, the crossed fertile transgenic plant may be a hybrid, or also inbred where it is crossed with itself.
The crossed fertile transgenic plant may comprise any of the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter compositions provided by the invention. In one embodiment of the invention, the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 40 to about 1864, about 95 to about 1864, about 110 to about 1864, about 125 to about 1864, about 250 to about 1864, about 400 to about 1864, about 750 to about 1864, about 1000 to about 1864, about 1500 to about 1864, about 1750 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2. In another embodiment of the invention, the fertile transgenic plant may comprise the full length of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2, or a derivative thereof. The maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter may further be operably linked to a selected heterologous coding region. Potentially any coding region could be used, including a selected coding region which encodes a protein selected from the group consisting of a protein imparting insect resistance, bacterial disease resistance, fungal disease resistance, viral disease resistance, nematode disease resistance, herbicide resistance, enhanced grain composition or quality, enhanced nutrient utilization, enhanced environment or stress resistance, reduced mycotoxin contamination, male sterility, a selectable marker phenotype, a screenable marker phenotype, a negative selectable marker phenotype, or altered plant agronomic characteristics. The plant may further comprise a selected DNA comprising an enhancer, for example, a rice actin 1 intron 1 and rice actin 2 intron 1. The selected coding region may be operably linked to a terminator, for example, a nos terminator.
In still yet another aspect, the invention provides a method of expressing a selected protein in a transgenic plant comprising the steps of: (i) obtaining a construct comprising a selected coding region operably linked to a maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, wherein the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter is isolatable from the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2; (ii) transforming a recipient plant cell with the construct; and (iii) regenerating a transgenic plant expressing the selected protein from the recipient plant cell. In one embodiment of the invention, the transgenic plant is fertile. The method may further comprise the step of obtaining seed from the fertile transgenic plant, and may still further comprise obtaining a progeny plant of any generation from the fertile transgenic plant. The transforming may be achieved in any manner, including a method selected from the group consisting of microprojectile bombardment, PEG mediated transformation of protoplasts, electroporation, silicon carbide fiber mediated transformation, or Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. In one embodiment of the invention, the step of transforming comprises microprojectile bombardment. The recipient plant cell may be of any type desired, including from a monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous plant. Examples of such a monocotyledonous plant include wheat, maize, rye, rice, turfgrass, oat, barley, sorghum, millet, and sugarcane. In one embodiment of the invention, the monocotyledonous plant is a maize plant. Examples of dicotyledonous plants include tobacco, tomato, potato, soybean, canola, sunflower, alfalfa and cotton.
Any type of selected coding region may be used with the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, including a coding region encoding a protein imparting insect resistance, bacterial disease resistance, fungal disease resistance, viral disease resistance, nematode disease resistance, herbicide resistance, enhanced grain composition or quality, enhanced nutrient utilization, enhanced environment or stress resistance, reduced mycotoxin contamination, male sterility, a selectable marker phenotype, a screenable marker phenotype, a negative selectable marker phenotype, or altered plant agronomic characteristics. The construct used may further comprise any additional sequences desired, including an enhancer. Exemplary enhancers include the rice actin 1 intron 1 and rice actin 2 intron 1. The selected coding region may be operably linked to a terminator, for example, a nos terminator.
In still yet another aspect, the invention provides a method of plant breeding comprising the steps of: (i) obtaining a transgenic plant comprising a selected DNA comprising a maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, wherein the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter is isolatable from the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2; and (ii) crossing the transgenic plant with itself or a second plant. The transgenic plant may be of potentially any species, including monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous plants. Examples of such monocotyledonous plants include wheat, maize, oat, barley, rye, rice, turfgrass, sorghum, millet and sugarcane. In one embodiment of the invention, the monocotyledonous plant is a maize plant. Examples of dicotyledonous plants include tobacco, tomato, potato, soybean, canola, sunflower, alfalfa and cotton. The selected DNA may comprise any of the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter compositions provided by the invention, and may comprise from about 40 to about 1864, about 95 to about 1864, about 110 to about 1864, about 125 to about 1864, about 250 to about 1864, about 400 to about 1864, about 750 to about 1864, about 1000 to about 1864, about 1500 to about 1864, about 1750 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2. The maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter may also comprise the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2, or a derivative thereof, such as a deletion mutant.
In one embodiment of the invention, the transgenic plant is crossed with the second plant. The second plant may be an inbred plant. The method may further comprise the steps of: (i) collecting seeds resulting from said crossing; (ii) growing said seeds to produce progeny plants; (iii) identifying a progeny plant comprising said selected DNA; and (iv) crossing said progeny plant with itself or a third plant. The progeny plant can inherit the selected DNA through a parent used as a male or female at any given generation. In one embodiment of the invention, the second plant and the third plant are of the same genotype, and further, may be inbred plants. The selected DNA may comprise potentially any coding region, for example, a coding region which encodes a protein imparting insect resistance, bacterial disease resistance, fungal disease resistance, viral disease resistance, nematode disease resistance, herbicide resistance, enhanced grain composition or quality, enhanced nutrient utilization, enhanced environment or stress resistance, reduced mycotoxin contamination, male sterility, a selectable marker phenotype, a screenable marker phenotype, a negative selectable marker phenotype, or altered plant agronomic characteristics. The selected DNA may further comprise a genetic element which enhances the expression of the protein in the transgenic plant, including a rice actin 1 intron 1 and the rice actin 2 intron 1.
In still yet another aspect, the invention provides a transgenic plant cell stably transformed with a selected DNA comprising a maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, wherein said maize chloroplastic aldolase promoter is isolatable from the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2. The plant cell may comprise any of the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter compositions provided by the invention, and may comprise from about 40 to about 1864, about 95 to about 1864, about 110 to about 1864, about 125 to about 1864, about 250 to about 1864, about 400 to about 1864, about 750 to about 1864, about 1000 to about 1864, about 1500 to about 1864, about 1750 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2. The maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter may also comprise the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2, or a derivative thereof The selected DNA may further comprise potentially any selected coding region operably linked to the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, including a selected coding region which encodes a protein imparting insect resistance, bacterial disease resistance, fungal disease resistance, viral disease resistance, nematode disease resistance, herbicide resistance, enhanced grain composition or quality, enhanced nutrient utilization, enhanced environment or stress resistance, reduced mycotoxin contamination, male sterility, a selectable marker phenotype, a screenable marker phenotype, a negative selectable marker phenotype, or altered plant agronomic characteristics. Where the selected coding sequence encodes a protein which imparts a selectable marker phenotype, exemplary coding sequences encode a protein selected from the group consisting of phosphinothricin acetyltransferase, glyphosate resistant EPSPS, aminoglycoside phosphotransferase, hygromycin phosphotransferase, neomycin phosphotransferase, dalapon dehalogenase, bromoxynil resistant nitrilase, anthranilate synthase and glyphosate oxidoreductase. The selected coding region may be operably linked to a terminator, such as a nos terminator. The selected DNA may also comprise an enhancer, including a rice actin 1 intron 1 and rice actin 2 intron 1.
The selected DNA may also comprise vector DNA, such as plasmid DNA, or may be isolated from such DNA. The selected DNA also may comprise a sequence encoding a signal peptide, including a peroxisomal targeting peptide or a chloroplast transit peptide. Exemplary transit peptides include a transit peptide selected from the group consisting of chlorophyll a/b binding protein transit peptide, small subunit of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase transit peptide, EPSPS transit peptide and dihydrodipocolinic acid synthase transit peptide. The transgenic plant cell may be of any species, and may be from a monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous plant. Exemplary monocotyledonous plants include wheat, maize, rye, rice, oat, barley, turfgrass, sorghum, millet and sugarcane. In one embodiment of the invention, the plant is a maize plant. Exemplary dicotyledonous plants include tobacco, tomato, potato, soybean, cotton, canola, alfalfa and sunflower. In one embodiment of the invention, the dicotyledonous plant is a soybean plant.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1: Map of plasmid pDPG595. The plasmid comprises a 2.2 Kb sequence comprising the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, the E. coli uidA gene and the Agrobacterium tumefaciens nos 3′ region.
FIG. 2: Sequence of the 1864 bp maize chloroplastic fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase promoter element (SEQ ID NO:2). The Bgl II site used for cloning is in bold type and the Sac I site used for cloning is underlined.
FIG. 3: Map of plasmid pDPG712. The plasmid comprises an 1864 base pair sequence comprising the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, the rice actin 1 intron 1, the E. coli uidA gene and the Agrobacterium tumefaciens nos 3′ region.
FIG. 4: Map of plasmid pMON30113. The plasmid comprises an expression cassette containing a Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S promoter operably linked to an hsp70 intron, a neomycin phosphotransferase II coding sequence, and termination and polyadenylation signal sequences derived from the nopaline synthase gene. PMON30113 further contains an expression cassette comprising a Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S promoter operably linked to a rice actin 1 intron 1 sequence, a green fluorescent protein coding sequence, and termination and polyadenylation signal sequences derived from the hsp70 gene.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The current invention overcomes deficiencies in the prior art by providing novel methods and compositions for the efficient expression of transgenes in plants. In particular, the current invention provides a promoter of a Zea mays chloroplastic fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (F16BP) aldolase gene. The chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter described herein represents an inducible constitutive promoter in which a basal level of expression may change in response to certain environmental factors including but not limited to nutrients, light, water stress, temperature and CO2 levels. An inducible constitutive promoter such as chloroplastic F16BP aldolase may find wide utility in directing the expression of potentially any gene which one desires to have expressed in a plant. This promoter represents a significant advance in that it is capable of directing inducible, high-level expression of transgenes in plants. The inducible nature of the promoter of the invention is important in that it allows expression of a transgene operatively linked to the promoter under specific environmental conditions as well as in specific tissues of the plant. For example, the light inducible nature of the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter means that enhanced nutrient utilization genes could be expressed primarily during daylight hours, which is when the bulk of carbon fixation and light-dependent carbon metabolism occurs. Additionally, the leaf-specific nature of the expression would allow for expression of genes in green tissues, thus not effecting expression of transgenes in root tissue. By avoiding continuous high-level expression of transgenes and avoiding expression in non-target tissues, potentially energy-draining effects caused by continual overexpression of transgenes can be minimized or eliminated.
The chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter sequence of the invention is exemplified by the nucleic acid sequence given in SEQ ID NO:2. However, in addition to the unmodified chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter sequence of SEQ ID NO:2, the current invention includes derivatives of this sequence and compositions made therefrom. In particular, the present disclosure provides the teaching for one of skill in the art to make and use derivatives of the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter. For example, the disclosure provides the teaching for one of skill in the art to delimit the functional elements within the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter and to delete any non-essential elements. Functional elements also could be modified to increase the utility of the sequences of the invention for any particular application. For example, a functional region within the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter of the invention could be modified to cause or increase inducible expression. Such changes could be made by site-specific mutagenesis techniques, for example, as described below.
One important application of the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter will be in the construction of vectors designed for introduction into plants by genetic transformation. By including an enhancer with the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, such as an actin 1 intron 1 or actin 2 intron 1, one may potentially increase the level of expression of coding regions operably linked to the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter. It also is believed that benefit will be obtained by including a transcriptional terminator with transgenes operably linked to the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter. One such terminator that could be used is from a gene encoding nopaline synthase (nos) from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Bevan et al., 1983). A second possible terminator that could be used is from a gene encoding the small subunit of a ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco), and more specifically, from a rice Rubisco gene (PCT Publication WO 00/70066).
I. Derivatives of the Sequences of the Invention
As indicated, an important aspect of the invention provides derivatives of the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter. In particular, the current invention includes sequences which have been derived from the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter disclosed herein. One efficient means for preparing such derivatives comprises introducing mutations into the sequences of the invention, for example, the sequence given in SEQ ID NO:2. Such mutants may potentially have enhanced or altered function relative to the native sequence or alternatively, may be silent with regard to function.
Mutagenesis may be carried out at random and the mutagenized sequences screened for function in a trial-by-error procedure. Alternatively, particular sequences which provide the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter with desirable expression characteristics could be identified and these or similar sequences introduced into other related or non-related sequences via mutation. Similarly, non-essential elements may be deleted without significantly altering the function of the elements. It further is contemplated that one could mutagenize these sequences in order to enhance their utility in expressing transgenes in a particular species, for example, in maize.
The means for mutagenizing a DNA segment encoding a chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter sequence of the current invention are well-known to those of skill in the art. Mutagenesis may be performed in accordance with any of the techniques known in the art, such as, but not limited to, synthesizing an oligonucleotide having one or more mutations within the sequence of a particular regulatory region. In particular, site-specific mutagenesis is a technique useful in the preparation of promoter mutants, through specific mutagenesis of the underlying DNA. The technique further provides a ready ability to prepare and test sequence variants, for example, incorporating one or more of the foregoing considerations, by introducing one or more nucleotide sequence changes into the DNA. Site-specific mutagenesis allows the production of mutants through the use of specific oligonucleotide sequences which encode the DNA sequence of the desired mutation, as well as a sufficient number of adjacent nucleotides, to provide a primer sequence of sufficient size and sequence complexity to form a stable duplex on both sides of the deletion junction being traversed. Typically, a primer of about 17 to about 75 nucleotides or more in length is preferred, with about 10 to about 25 or more residues on both sides of the junction of the sequence being altered.
In general, the technique of site-specific mutagenesis is well known in the art, as exemplified by various publications. As will be appreciated, the technique typically employs a phage vector which exists in both a single-stranded and double-stranded form. Typical vectors useful in site-directed mutagenesis include vectors such as the M13 phage. These phage are readily commercially available and their use is generally well known to those skilled in the art. Double-stranded plasmids also are routinely employed in site-directed mutagenesis which eliminates the step of transferring the gene of interest from a plasmid to a phage.
Site-directed mutagenesis in accordance herewith typically is performed by first obtaining a single-stranded vector or melting apart of two strands of a double-stranded vector which includes within its sequence a DNA sequence which encodes the maize cytoplasmic F16BP aldolase promoter. An oligonucleotide primer bearing the desired mutated sequence is prepared, generally synthetically. This primer is then annealed with the single-stranded vector and subjected to DNA polymerizing enzymes such as the E. coli polymerase I Klenow fragment, in order to complete the synthesis of the mutation-bearing strand. Thus, a heteroduplex is formed wherein one strand encodes the original non-mutated sequence and the second strand bears the desired mutation. This heteroduplex vector is then used to transform or transfect appropriate cells, such as E. coli cells, and cells are selected which include recombinant vectors bearing the mutated sequence arrangement. Vector DNA can then be isolated from these cells and used for plant transformation. A genetic selection scheme was devised by Kunkel et al. (1987) to enrich for clones incorporating mutagenic oligonucleotides. Alternatively, the use of PCR with commercially available thermostable enzymes such as Taq polymerase may be used to incorporate a mutagenic oligonucleotide primer into an amplified DNA fragment that can then be cloned into an appropriate cloning or expression vector. The PCR-mediated mutagenesis procedures of Tomic et al. (1990) and Upender et al. (1995) provide two examples of such protocols. A PCR employing a thermostable ligase in addition to a thermostable polymerase also may be used to incorporate a phosphorylated mutagenic oligonucleotide into an amplified DNA fragment that may then be cloned into an appropriate cloning or expression vector.
The preparation of sequence variants of the selected promoter DNA segments using site-directed mutagenesis is provided as a means of producing potentially useful species and is not meant to be limiting as there are other ways in which sequence variants of DNA sequences may be obtained. For example, recombinant vectors encoding the desired promoter sequence may be treated with mutagenic agents, such as hydroxylamine, to obtain sequence variants.
As used herein, the term “oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis procedure” refers to template-dependent processes and vector-mediated propagation which result in an increase in the concentration of a specific nucleic acid molecule relative to its initial concentration, or in an increase in the concentration of a detectable signal, such as amplification. As used herein, the term “oligonucleotide directed mutagenesis procedure” also is intended to refer to a process that involves the template-dependent extension of a primer molecule. The term “template-dependent process” refers to nucleic acid synthesis of an RNA or a DNA molecule wherein the sequence of the newly synthesized strand of nucleic acid is dictated by the well-known rules of complementary base pairing (see, for example, Watson and Ramstad, 1987). Typically, vector mediated methodologies involve the introduction of the nucleic acid fragment into a DNA or RNA vector, the clonal amplification of the vector, and the recovery of the amplified nucleic acid fragment. Examples of such methodologies are provided by U.S. Pat. No. 4,237,224, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. A number of template dependent processes are available to amplify the target sequences of interest present in a sample, such methods being well known in the art and specifically disclosed herein below.
One efficient, targeted means for preparing mutagenized promoters or enhancers relies upon the identification of putative regulatory elements within the target sequence. This can be initiated by comparison with, for example, promoter sequences known to be expressed in a similar manner. Sequences which are shared among elements with similar functions or expression patterns are likely candidates for the binding of transcription factors and are thus likely elements which confer expression patterns. Confirmation of these putative regulatory elements can be achieved by deletion analysis of each putative regulatory region followed by functional analysis of each deletion construct by assay of a reporter gene which is functionally attached to each construct. As such, once a starting promoter or intron sequence is provided, any of a number of different functional deletion mutants of the starting sequence could be readily prepared.
As indicated above, deletion mutants of the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter also could be randomly prepared and then assayed. With this strategy, a series of constructs are prepared, each containing a different portion of the clone (a subclone), and these constructs are then screened for activity. A suitable means for screening for activity is to attach a deleted promoter construct to a selectable or screenable marker, and to isolate only those cells expressing the marker protein. In this way, a number of different, deleted promoter constructs are identified which still retain the desired, or even enhanced, activity. The smallest segment which is required for activity is thereby identified through comparison of the selected constructs. This segment may then be used for the construction of vectors for the expression of exogenous protein.
II. Plant Transformation Constructs
The construction of vectors which may be employed in conjunction with plant transformation techniques according to the invention will be known to those of skill of the art in light of the present disclosure (see for example, Sambrook et al., 1989; Gelvin et al., 1990). The techniques of the current invention are thus not limited to any particular DNA sequences in conjunction with the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter of the invention. For example, the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter alone could be transformed into a plant with the goal of enhancing or altering the expression of one or more genes in the host genome.
One important use of the sequences of the invention will be in directing the expression of a selected coding region which encodes a particular protein or polypeptide product. The inventors also contemplate that, where both an expressible gene that is not necessarily a marker gene is employed in combination with a marker gene, one may employ the separate genes on either the same or different DNA segments for transformation. In the latter case, the different vectors are delivered concurrently to recipient cells to maximize cotransformation.
In certain embodiments, the present inventors contemplate the transformation of a recipient cell with more than transformation construct. Two or more transgenes can be introduced in a single transformation event using either distinct selected-protein encoding vectors, or using a single vector incorporating two or more gene coding sequences. Of course, any two or more transgenes of any description, such as those conferring, for example, herbicide, insect, disease (viral, bacterial, fungal, nematode) or drought resistance, male sterility, drydown, standability, prolificacy, starch quantity or properties, oil quantity and quality, or those increasing yield or nutritional quality may be employed as desired.
In other embodiments of the invention, it is contemplated that one may wish to employ replication-competent viral vectors for plant transformation. Such vectors include, for example, wheat dwarf virus (WDV) “shuttle” vectors, such as pW1-11 and pW1-GUS (Ugaki et al., 1991). These vectors are capable of autonomous replication in maize cells as well as E. coli, and as such may provide increased sensitivity for detecting DNA delivered to transgenic cells. A replicating vector also may be useful for delivery of genes flanked by DNA sequences from transposable elements such as Ac, Ds, or Mu. It has been proposed that transposition of these elements within the maize genome requires DNA replication (Laufs et al., 1990). It also is contemplated that transposable elements would be useful for producing transgenic plants lacking elements necessary for selection and maintenance of the plasmid vector in bacteria, e.g., antibiotic resistance genes, or other selectable markers, and origins of DNA replication. It also is proposed that use of a transposable element such as Ac, Ds, or Mu would actively promote integration of the desired DNA and hence increase the frequency of stably transformed cells.
It further is contemplated that one may wish to co-transform plants or plant cells with two or more genes of interest. Co-transformation may be achieved using a vector containing the marker and another gene or genes of interest. Alternatively, different vectors, e.g. plasmids, may contain the different genes of interest, and the plasmids may be concurrently delivered to the recipient cells. It is the present applicants' experience using microprojectile bombardment that a certain percentage of cells in which the marker has been introduced also have received the other gene(s) of interest, and that the selectable marker and gene(s) of interest are cointegrated at a single locus in the host genome. However, not all cells selected by means of the marker, will express the other proteins of interest which had been presented to the cells concurrently.
Vectors used for plant transformation may include, for example, plasmids, cosmids, YACs (yeast artificial chromosomes), BACs (bacterial artificial chromosomes), PACs (plant artificial chromosomes), or any other suitable cloning system. It is contemplated that utilization of cloning systems with large insert capacities will allow introduction of large DNA sequences comprising more than one selected gene. Introduction of such sequences may be facilitated by use of bacterial or yeast artificial chromosomes (BACs or YACs, respectively), or even plant artificial chromosomes (PACs). For example, the use of BACs for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was disclosed by Hamilton et al. (1996).
Particularly useful for transformation are expression cassettes which have been isolated from such vectors. DNA segments used for transforming plant cells will, of course, generally comprise the cDNA, gene or genes which one desires to introduced into and have expressed in the host cells. These DNA segments can further include, in addition to a chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, structures such as promoters, enhancers, terminators, polylinkers, or even regulatory genes as desired. The DNA segment or gene chosen for cellular introduction may encode a protein which will be expressed in the resultant recombinant cells resulting in a screenable or selectable trait and/or which will impart an improved phenotype to the resulting transgenic plant. However, this may not always be the case, and the present invention also encompasses transgenic plants incorporating non-expressed transgenes. Preferred components likely to be included with vectors used in the current invention are as follows.
A. Regulatory Elements
Constructs prepared in accordance with the current invention will include a chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter or a derivative thereof However, these sequences may be used in the preparation of transformation constructs which comprise a wide variety of other elements. One such application in accordance with the instant invention will be the preparation of transformation constructs comprising the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter operably linked to a selected coding region. By including an enhancer sequence with such constructs, the expression of the selected protein may be enhanced. These enhancers often are found 5′ to the start of transcription in a promoter that functions in eukaryotic cells, but can often be inserted in the forward or reverse orientation 5′ or 3′ to the coding sequence. In some instances, these 5′ enhancing elements are introns. Deemed to be particularly useful as enhancers are the 5′ introns of the rice actin 1 and rice actin 2 genes. Examples of other enhancers which could be used in accordance with the invention include elements from the CaMV 35S promoter, octopine synthase genes (Ellis et al., 1987), the maize alcohol dehydrogenase gene, the maize shrunken 1 gene and promoters from non-plant eukaryotes (e.g., yeast; Ma et al., 1988).
Where an enhancer is used in conjunction with a chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter for the expression of a selected protein, it is believed that it will be preferred to place the enhancer between the promoter and the start codon of the selected coding region. However, one also could use a different arrangement of the enhancer relative to other sequences and still realize the beneficial properties conferred by the enhancer. For example, the enhancer could be placed 5′ of the promoter region, within the promoter region, within the coding sequence (including within any other intron sequences which may be present), or 3′ of the coding region.
In addition to introns with enhancing activity, other types of elements can influence gene expression. For example, untranslated leader sequences predicted to enhance gene expression as well as “consensus” and preferred leader sequences have been made (Joshi, 1987). Preferred leader sequences are contemplated to include those which have sequences predicted to direct optimum expression of the attached coding region, i.e., to include a preferred consensus leader sequence which may increase or maintain mRNA stability and prevent inappropriate initiation of translation. The choice of such sequences will be known to those of skill in the art in light of the present disclosure. Sequences that are derived from genes that are highly expressed in plants, and in maize in particular, will be most preferred, for example, sequences derived from the small subunit of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (rubisco).
Specifically contemplated for use in accordance with the present invention are vectors which include the ocs enhancer element. This element was first identified as a 16 bp palindromic enhancer from the octopine synthase (ocs) gene of Agrobacterium (Ellis et al., 1987), and is present in at least 10 other promoters (Bouchez et al., 1989). It is proposed that the use of an enhancer element, such as the ocs element and particularly multiple copies of the element, may be used to increase the level of transcription from adjacent promoters when applied in the context of monocot transformation.
Ultimately, the most desirable DNA segments for introduction into a plant genome may be homologous genes or gene families which encode a desired trait, and which are introduced under the control of the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter. For example, it is envisioned that a particular use of the present invention may be the production of transformants comprising a transgene, the expression of which is directed by the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, whereby the expression is enhanced by an actin 1 intron 1 or actin 2 intron 1. In addition, it is contemplated that the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter may be inducible during water stress as it contains two copies of the 6-base pair sequence TGGTTT, a previously described anaerobic response element found in other maize promoters (U.S. Pat. No. 5,001,060).
It also is contemplated that expression of one or more transgenes may be eliminated upon induction of the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter provided herein. In particular, by operably linking the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter to a particular coding sequence in antisense orientation, accumulation of the respective protein encoded by the sense transcript could be eliminated or decreased upon induction of the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter. This could allow, for example, inducible elimination of a particular gene product which would contribute to the ill effects of osmotic stress or attack by pests, disease, or other conditions.
It also is contemplated that it may be useful to target DNA within a cell. For example, it may be useful to target introduced DNA to the nucleus as this may increase the frequency of transformation. Particular DNA sequences which are capable of targeting DNA to the nucleus are known, e.g., the Agrobacterium tumefaciens virD2 gene (Tinland et al., 1995). Within the nucleus itself, it would be useful to target a gene in order to achieve site specific integration. For example, it would be useful to have a gene introduced through transformation replace an existing gene in the cell. Furthermore, it would be useful to target a transgene to integrate into the genome at a predetermined site from which it is known that gene expression occurs. Several site specific recombination systems exist which are known, including cre-lox (U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,317) and FLP-FRT (U.S. Pat. No. 5,527,695). Both of these cited site specific recombination systems have been shown to function in plants (Albert et al., 1995; Lyznik et al., 1996).
B. Terminators
Transformation constructs prepared in accordance with the invention will typically include a 3′ end DNA sequence that acts as a signal to terminate transcription and allow for the poly-adenylation of the mRNA produced by coding sequences operably linked to the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter. One type of terminator sequence which may be used is a terminator from the nopaline synthase gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (nos 3′ end; Bevan et al., 1983). Where a 3′ end other than a nos terminator is used in accordance with the invention, the most preferred 3′ ends are contemplated to be those from a gene encoding the small subunit of a ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (rbcS), and more specifically, from a rice rbcS gene (PCT Publication WO 00/70066), the terminator for the T7 transcript of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Dhaese et al., 1983), the 3′ end of the protease inhibitor I or II genes from potato (Graham et al., 1986) or tomato (Pearce et al., 1991), and the 3′ region isolated from Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (Timmermans et al., 1990). Alternatively, one also could use a gamma coixin, oleosin 3 or other terminators from the genus Coix (PCT Publication WO 99/58659).
C. Transit or Signal Peptides
Sequences that are joined to the coding sequence of an expressed gene, which are removed post-translationally from the initial translation product and which facilitate the transport of the protein into or through intracellular or extracellular membranes, are termed transit (usually into vacuoles, vesicles, plastids and other intracellular organelles) and signal sequences (usually to the endoplasmic reticulum, golgi apparatus, peroxisomes or glyoxysomes, and outside of the cellular membrane). By facilitating the transport of the protein into compartments inside and outside the cell, these sequences may increase the accumulation of a gene product protecting the protein from intracellular proteolytic degradation. These sequences also allow for additional mRNA sequences from highly expressed genes to be attached to the coding sequence of the genes. Since mRNA being translated by ribosomes is more stable than naked mRNA, the presence of translatable MRNA 5′ of the gene of interest may increase the overall stability of the mRNA transcript from the gene and thereby increase synthesis of the gene product. Since transit and signal sequences are usually post-translationally removed from the initial translation product, the use of these sequences allows for the addition of extra translated sequences that may not appear on the final polypeptide. It further is contemplated that targeting of certain proteins may be desirable in order to enhance the stability of the protein (U.S. Pat. No. 5,545,818, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety).
A particular example of such a use concerns the direction of a protein conferring herbicide resistance, such as a mutant EPSPS protein, to a particular organelle such as the chloroplast rather than to the cytoplasm. This is exemplified by the use of the rbcS transit peptide, the chloroplast transit peptide described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,728,925, or the optimized transit peptide described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,510,471, which confers plastid-specific targeting of proteins. In addition, it may be desirable to target certain genes responsible for male sterility to the mitochondria, or to target certain genes for resistance to phytopathogenic organisms to the extracellular spaces, or to target proteins to the vacuole. A further use concerns the direction of enzymes involved in amino acid biosynthesis or oil synthesis to the plastid. Such enzymes include dihydrodipicolinic acid synthase which may contribute to increasing lysine content of a feed.
Additionally, vectors may be constructed and employed in the intracellular targeting of a specific gene product within the cells of a transgenic plant or in directing a protein to the extracellular environment. This generally will be achieved by joining a DNA sequence encoding a transit or signal peptide sequence to the coding sequence of a particular gene. An intracellular targeting DNA sequence may be operably linked 5′ or 3′ to the coding sequence depending on the particular targeting sequence. The resultant transit, or signal, peptide will transport the protein to a particular intracellular, or extracellular destination, respectively, and will then be post-translationally removed.
D. Marker Genes
One application of the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter of the current invention will be in the expression of marker proteins. By employing a selectable or screenable marker gene as, or in addition to, the gene of interest, one can provide or enhance the ability to identify transformants. “Marker genes” are genes that impart a distinct phenotype to cells expressing the marker gene and thus allow such transformed cells to be distinguished from cells that do not have the marker. Such genes may encode either a selectable or screenable marker, depending on whether the marker confers a trait which one can “select” for by chemical means, i.e., through the use of a selective agent (e.g., a herbicide, antibiotic, or the like), or whether it is simply a trait that one can identify through observation or testing, i.e., by “screening” (e.g., the green fluorescent protein). Of course, many examples of suitable marker genes are known to the art and can be employed in the practice of the invention.
Included within the terms selectable or screenable marker genes also are genes which encode a “secretable marker” whose secretion can be detected as a means of identifying or selecting for transformed cells. Examples include marker genes which encode a secretable antigen that can be identified by antibody interaction, or even secretable enzymes which can be detected by their catalytic activity. Secretable proteins fall into a number of classes, including small, diffusible proteins detectable, e.g., by ELISA; small active enzymes detectable in extracellular solution (e.g., α-amylase, β-lactamase, phosphinothricin acetyltransferase); and proteins that are inserted or trapped in the cell wall (e.g., proteins that include a leader sequence such as that found in the expression unit of extensin or tobacco PR-S).
With regard to selectable secretable markers, the use of a gene that encodes a protein that becomes sequestered in the cell wall, and which protein includes a unique epitope is considered to be particularly advantageous. Such a secreted antigen marker would ideally employ an epitope sequence that would provide low background in plant tissue, a promoter-leader sequence that would impart efficient expression and targeting across the plasma membrane, and would produce protein that is bound in the cell wall and yet accessible to antibodies. A normally secreted wall protein modified to include a unique epitope would satisfy all such requirements.
One example of a protein suitable for modification in this manner is extensin, or hydroxyproline rich glycoprotein (HPRG). The use of maize HPRG (Steifel et al., 1990) is preferred, as this molecule is well characterized in terms of molecular biology, expression and protein structure. However, any one of a variety of extensins and/or glycine-rich wall proteins (Keller et al., 1989) could be modified by the addition of an antigenic site to create a screenable marker.
One exemplary embodiment of a secretable screenable marker concerns the use of a HPRG sequence modified to include a 15 residue epitope from the pro-region of murine interleukin-1β (IL-1β). However, virtually any detectable epitope may be employed in such embodiments, as selected from the extremely wide variety of antigen:antibody combinations known to those of skill in the art. The unique extracellular epitope, whether derived from IL-1β or any other protein or epitopic substance, can then be straightforwardly detected using antibody labeling in conjunction with chromogenic or fluorescent adjuncts.

    
    
        1. Selectable Markers
    
    


Many selectable marker coding regions may be used in connection with the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter of the present invention including, but not limited to, neo (Potrykus et al., 1985) which provides kanamycin resistance and can be selected for using kanamycin, G418, paromomycin, etc.; bar, which confers bialaphos or phosphinothricin resistance; a mutant EPSP synthase protein (Hinchee et al., 1988) conferring glyphosate resistance; a nitrilase such as bxn from Klebsiella ozaenae which confers resistance to bromoxynil (Stalker et al., 1988); a mutant acetolactate synthase (ALS) which confers resistance to imidazolinone, sulfonylurea or other ALS inhibiting chemicals (EP 0 154 204); a methotrexate resistant DHFR (Thillet et al., 1988), a dalapon dehalogenase that confers resistance to the herbicide dalapon; or a mutated anthranilate synthase that confers resistance to 5-methyl tryptophan or other anthranilate synthase inhibiting compounds. Where a mutant EPSP synthase is employed, additional benefit may be realized through the incorporation of a suitable chloroplast transit peptide, CTP (U.S. Pat. No. 5,188,642) or OTP (U.S. Pat. No. 5,633,448) and use of a modified maize EPSPS (PCT Publication WO 97/04103).
An illustrative embodiment of selectable markers capable of being used in systems to select transformants are the enzyme phosphinothricin acetyltransferase, such as bar from Streptomyces hygroscopicus or pat from Streptomyces viridochromogenes. The enzyme phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT) inactivates the active ingredient in the herbicide bialaphos, phosphinothricin (PPT). PPT inhibits glutamine synthetase, (Murakami et al., 1986; Twell et al., 1989) causing rapid accumulation of ammonia and cell death.
Where one desires to employ bialaphos or phosphinothricin resistance in the practice of the invention, particularly useful genes for this purpose are the bar or pat genes obtainable from species of Streptomyces (e.g., ATCC No. 21,705). The cloning of the bar gene has been described (Murakami et al., 1986; Thompson et al., 1987) as has the use of the bar gene in the context of plants (De Block et al., 1987; DeBlock et al., 1989; U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,318).

    
    
        2. Screenable Markers
    
    


Screenable markers that may be employed include a β-glucuronidase or uidA gene (Jefferson et al., 1986; the protein product is commonly referred to as GUS), isolated from E. coli, which encodes an enzyme for which various chromogenic substrates are known; an R-locus gene, which encodes a product that regulates the production of anthocyanin pigments (red color) in plant tissues (Dellaporta et al., 1988); a β-lactamase gene (Sutcliffe, 1978), which encodes an enzyme for which various chromogenic substrates are known (e.g., PADAC, a chromogenic cephalosporin); a xylE gene (Zukowsky et al., 1983) which encodes a catechol dioxygenase that can convert chromogenic catechols; an α-amylase gene (Ikuta et al., 1990); a tyrosinase gene (Katz et al., 1983) which encodes an enzyme capable of oxidizing tyrosine to DOPA and dopaquinone which in turn condenses to form the easily-detectable compound melanin; a β-galactosidase gene, which encodes an enzyme for which there are chromogenic substrates; a luciferase (lux) gene (Ow et al., 1986), which allows for bioluminescence detection; an aequorin gene (Prasher et al., 1985) which may be employed in calcium-sensitive bioluminescence detection; or a gene encoding for green fluorescent protein (Sheen et al., 1995; Haseloff et al., 1997; Reichel et al., 1996; Tian et al., 1997; PCT Publication WO 97/41228).
Genes from the maize R gene complex are contemplated to be particularly useful as screenable markers. The R gene complex in maize encodes a protein that acts to regulate the production of anthocyanin pigments in most seed and plant tissue. Maize strains can have one, or as many as four, R alleles which combine to regulate pigmentation in a developmental and tissue specific manner. Thus, an R gene introduced into such cells will cause the expression of a red pigment and, if stably incorporated, can be visually scored as a red sector. If a maize line carries dominant alleles for genes encoding for the enzymatic intermediates in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway (C2, A1, A2, Bz1 and Bz2), but carries a recessive allele at the R locus, transformation of any cell from that line with R will result in red pigment formation. Exemplary lines include Wisconsin 22 which contains the rg-Stadler allele and TR112, a K55 derivative which has the genotype r-g, b, P1. Alternatively, any genotype of maize can be utilized if the C1 and R alleles are introduced together.
It further is proposed that R gene regulatory regions may be employed in chimeric constructs in order to provide mechanisms for controlling the expression of chimeric genes. More diversity of phenotypic expression is known at the R locus than at any other locus (Coe et al., 1988). It is contemplated that regulatory regions obtained from regions 5′ to the structural R gene would be valuable in directing the expression of genes for, e.g., insect resistance, herbicide tolerance or other protein coding regions. For the purposes of the present invention, it is believed that any of the various R gene family members may be successfully employed (e.g., P, S, Lc, etc.) in conjunction with the chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter described herein. However, the most preferred will generally be Sn (particularly Sn:bol3). Sn is a dominant member of the R gene complex and is functionally similar to the R and B loci in that Sn controls the tissue specific deposition of anthocyanin pigments in certain seedling and plant cells, therefore, its phenotype is similar to R.
Other screenable markers provide for visible light emission as a screenable phenotype. A screenable marker contemplated for use in the present invention is firefly luciferase, encoded by the lux gene. The presence of the lux gene in transformed cells may be detected using, for example, X-ray film, scintillation counting, fluorescent spectrophotometry, low-light video cameras, photon counting cameras or multiwell luminometry. It also is envisioned that this system may be developed for populational screening for bioluminescence, such as on tissue culture plates, or even for whole plant screening. The gene which encodes green fluorescent protein (GFP) is contemplated as a particularly useful reporter gene (Sheen et al., 1995; Haseloff et al., 1997; Reichel et al., 1996; Tian et al., 1997; PCT Publication WO 97/41228). Expression of green fluorescent protein may be visualized in a cell or plant as fluorescence following illumination by particular wavelengths of light. Where use of a screenable marker gene such as lux or GFP is desired, the inventors contemplated that benefit may be realized by creating a gene fusion between the screenable marker gene and a selectable marker gene, for example, a GFP-NPTII gene fusion. This could allow, for example, selection of transformed cells followed by screening of transgenic plants or seeds. In a similar manner, it is possible to utilize other readily available fluorescent proteins such as red fluorescent protein (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, Calif.).
III. Exogenous Genes for Modification of Plant Phenotypes
A particularly important advance of the present invention is that it provides methods and compositions for the efficient expression of selected genes in plant cells. In particular, the current invention provides a chloroplast F16BP aldolase promoter for the expression of selected proteins in plants. By including an enhancer with transformation constructs comprising the chloroplast F16BP aldolase promoter, increased expression of selected genes can be realized following introduction of the transformation construct into a host plant cell.
The choice of a selected gene for expression in a plant host cell in accordance with the invention will depend on the purpose of the transformation. One of the major purposes of transformation of crop plants is to add commercially desirable, agronomically important or end-product traits to the plant. Such traits include, but are not limited to, herbicide resistance or tolerance, insect resistance or tolerance, disease resistance or tolerance (viral, bacterial, fungal, nematode), stress tolerance and/or resistance, as exemplified by resistance or tolerance to drought, heat, chilling, freezing, excessive moisture, salt stress and oxidative stress, increased yield, food or feed content and value, physical appearance, male sterility, drydown, standability, prolificacy, starch quantity and quality, oil quantity and quality, protein quality and quantity, amino acid composition, and the like.
In certain embodiments of the invention, transformation of a recipient cell may be carried out with more than one exogenous (selected) gene. As used herein, an “exogenous coding region” or “selected coding region” is a coding region not normally found in the host genome in an identical context. By this, it is meant that the coding region may be isolated from a different species than that of the host genome, or alternatively, isolated from the host genome, but is operably linked to one or more regulatory regions which differ from those found in the unaltered, native gene. Two or more exogenous coding regions also can be supplied in a single transformation event using either distinct transgene-encoding vectors, or using a single vector incorporating two or more coding sequences. For example, plasmids bearing a gene encoding phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (conferring resistance to glufosinate herbicide, e.g. bar or pat) and a gene encoding a glyphosate resistant EPSPS gene, e.g., CP4 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,627,061) in either convergent, divergent, or colinear orientation, are considered to be particularly useful. Further preferred combinations are those of an insect resistance gene, such as a Bt gene, along with a protease inhibitor gene such as pinII, or the use of bar in combination with either of the above genes. Of course, any two or more transgenes of any description, such as those conferring herbicide, insect, disease (viral, bacterial, fungal, nematode) or drought resistance, male sterility, drydown, standability, prolificacy, starch properties, oil quantity and quality, or those increasing yield or nutritional quality may be employed as desired.
A. Herbicide Resistance
The DNA segments encoding phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (bar and pat), EPSP synthase encoding genes conferring resistance to glyphosate, the glyphosate degradative enzyme gene gox encoding glyphosate oxidoreductase, deh (encoding a dehalogenase enzyme that inactivates dalapon), herbicide resistant (e.g., sulfonylurea and imidazolinone) acetolactate synthase, and bxn genes (encoding a nitrilase enzyme that degrades bromoxynil) are examples of herbicide resistant genes for use in transformation. The bar and pat genes code for an enzyme, phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT), which inactivates the herbicide phosphinothricin and prevents this compound from inhibiting glutamine synthetase enzymes. The enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase (EPSP Synthase), is normally inhibited by the herbicide N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine (glyphosate) in plants and most microorganisms. However, genes are known that encode glyphosate-resistant EPSP synthase enzymes, including mutated EPSPS genes, e.g., the Salmonella typhimurium aroA CT7 mutant (Comai et al., 1985) and the naturally occurring glyphosate resistant EPSPS from Agrobacterium, CP4 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,627,061). These genes are particularly contemplated for use in plant transformation. The deh gene encodes the enzyme dalapon dehalogenase and confers resistance to the herbicide dalapon (U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,708). The bxn gene codes for a specific nitrilase enzyme that converts bromoxynil to a non-herbicidal degradation product.
B. Insect Resistance
Potential insect resistance genes that can be introduced include Bacillus thuringiensis crystal toxin genes or Bt genes (Watrud et al., 1985). Bt genes may provide resistance to economically important lepidopteran or coleopteran pests such as European Corn Borer (ECB) and Western Corn Rootworm, respectively. It is contemplated that preferred Bt genes for use in the transformation protocols disclosed herein will be those in which the coding sequence has been modified to effect increased expression in plants, and more particularly, in maize. Means for preparing synthetic genes are well known in the art and are disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,500,365 and 5,689,052, each of the disclosures of which are specifically incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Examples of such modified Bt toxin genes include a synthetic Bt CryIA(b) gene (Perlak et al., 1991), and the synthetic CryIA(c) gene termed 1800b (PCT Publication WO 95/06128). Some examples of other Bt toxin genes known to those of skill in the art are given in Table 1 below.







TABLE 1







Bacillus thuringiensis δ-Endotoxin Genesa











New
Old
GenBank



Nomenclature
Nomenclature
Accession







Cry1Aa
CryIA(a)
M11250



Cry1Ab
CryIA(b)
M13898



Cry1Ac
CryIA(c)
M11068



Cry1Ad
CryIA(d)
M73250



Cry1Ae
CryIA(e)
M65252



Cry1Ba
CryIB
X06711



Cry1Bb
ET5
L32020



Cry1Bc
PEG5
Z46442



Cry1Bd
CryE1
U70726



Cry1Ca
CryIC
X07518



Cry1Cb
CryIC(b)
M97880



Cry1Da
CryID
X54160



Cry1Db
PrtB
Z22511



Cry1Ea
CryIE
X53985



Cry1Eb
CryIE(b)
M73253



Cry1Fa
CryIF
M63897



Cry1Fb
PrtD
Z22512



Cry1Ga
PrtA
Z22510



Cry1Gb
CryH2
U70725



Cry1Ha
PrtC
Z22513



Cry1Hb

U35780



Cry1Ia
CryV
X62821



Cry1Ib
CryV
U07642



Cry1Ja
ET4
L32019



Cry1Jb
ET1
U31527



Cry1K

U28801



Cry2Aa
CryIIA
M31738



Cry2Ab
CryIIB
M23724



Cry2Ac
CryIIC
X57252



Cry3A
CryIIIA
M22472



Cry3Ba
CryIIIB
X17123



Cry3Bb
CryIIIB2
M89794



Cry3C
CryIIID
X59797



Cry4A
CryIVA
Y00423



Cry4B
CryIVB
X07423



Cry5Aa
CryVA(a)
L07025



Cry5Ab
CryVA(b)
L07026



Cry6A
CryVIA
L07022



Cry6B
CryVIB
L07024



Cry7Aa
CryIIIC
M64478



Cry7Ab
CryIIICb
U04367



Cry8A
CryIIIE
U04364



Cry8B
CryIIIG
U04365



Cry8C
CryIIIF
U04366



Cry9A
CryIG
X58120



Cry9B
CryIX
X75019



Cry9C
CryIH
Z37527



Cry10A
CryIVC
M12662



Cry11A
CryIVD
M31737



Cry11B
Jeg80
X86902



Cry12A
CryVB
L07027



Cry13A
CryVC
L07023



Cry14A
CryVD
U13955



Cry15A
34kDa
M76442



Cry16A
cbm71
X94146



Cry17A
cbm71
X99478



Cry18A
CryBP1
X99049



Cry19A
Jeg65
Y08920



Cyt1Aa
CytA
X03182



Cyt1Ab
CytM
X98793



Cyt2A
CytB
Z14147



Cyt2B
CytB
U52043







aAdapted from: http://epunix.biols.susx.ac.uk/Home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/index.html






Protease inhibitors also may provide insect resistance (Johnson et al., 1989), and thus will have utility in plant transformation. The use of a protease inhibitor II gene, pinII, from tomato or potato is envisioned to be particularly useftil. Even more advantageous is the use of a pinII gene in combination with a Bt toxin gene, the combined effect of which has been discovered to produce synergistic insecticidal activity. Other genes which encode inhibitors of the insect's digestive system, or those that encode enzymes or co-factors that facilitate the production of inhibitors, also may be useful. This group may be exemplified by oryzacystatin and amylase inhibitors such as those from wheat and barley.
Also, genes encoding lectins may confer additional or alternative insecticide properties. Lectins (originally termed phytohemagglutinins) are multivalent carbohydrate-binding proteins which have the ability to agglutinate red blood cells from a range of species. Lectins have been identified recently as insecticidal agents with activity against weevils, ECB and rootworm (Murdock et al., 1990; Czapla & Lang, 1990). Lectin genes contemplated to be useful include, for example, barley and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) and rice lectins (Gatehouse et al., 1984), with WGA being preferred.
Genes controlling the production of large or small polypeptides active against insects when introduced into the insect pests, such as, e.g., lytic peptides, peptide hormones and toxins and venoms, form another aspect of the invention. For example, it is contemplated that the expression of juvenile hormone esterase, directed towards specific insect pests, also may result in insecticidal activity, or perhaps cause cessation of metamorphosis (Hammock et al., 1990).
Transgenic plants expressing genes which encode enzymes that affect the integrity of the insect cuticle form yet another aspect of the invention. Such genes include those encoding, e.g., chitinase, proteases, lipases and also genes for the production of nikkomycin, a compound that inhibits chitin synthesis, the introduction of any of which is contemplated to produce insect resistant plants. Genes that code for activities that affect insect molting, such as those affecting the production of ecdysteroid UDP-glucosyl transferase, also fall within the scope of the useful transgenes of the present invention.
Genes that code for enzymes that facilitate the production of compounds that reduce the nutritional quality of the host plant to insect pests also are encompassed by the present invention. It may be possible, for instance, to confer insecticidal activity on a plant by altering its sterol composition. Sterols are obtained by insects from their diet and are used for hormone synthesis and membrane stability. Therefore, alterations in plant sterol composition by expression of novel genes, e.g., those that directly promote the production of undesirable sterols or those that convert desirable sterols into undesirable forms, could have a negative effect on insect growth and/or development and hence endow the plant with insecticidal activity. Lipoxygenases are naturally occurring plant enzymes that have been shown to exhibit anti-nutritional effects on insects and to reduce the nutritional quality of their diet. Therefore, further embodiments of the invention concern transgenic plants with enhanced lipoxygenase activity which may be resistant to insect feeding.
Tripsacum dactyloides is a species of grass that is resistant to certain insects, including corn root worm. It is anticipated that genes encoding proteins that are toxic to insects or are involved in the biosynthesis of compounds toxic to insects will be isolated from Tripsacum and that these novel genes will be useful in conferring resistance to insects. It is known that the basis of insect resistance in Tripsacum is genetic, because said resistance has been transferred to Zea mays via sexual crosses (Branson and Guss, 1972). It further is anticipated that other cereal, monocot or dicot plant species may have genes encoding proteins that are toxic to insects which would be useful for producing insect resistant corn plants.
Further genes encoding proteins characterized as having potential insecticidal activity also may be used as transgenes in accordance herewith. Such genes include, for example, the cowpea trypsin inhibitor (CpTI; Hilder et al., 1987) which may be used as a rootworm deterrent; genes encoding avermectin (Campbell, 1989; Ikeda et al., 1987) which may prove particularly useful as a corn rootworm deterrent; ribosome inactivating protein genes; and even genes that regulate plant structures. Transgenic maize including anti-insect antibody genes and genes that code for enzymes that can convert a non-toxic insecticide (pro-insecticide) applied to the outside of the plant into an insecticide inside the plant also are contemplated.
C. Environment or Stress Resistance Improvement of a plants ability to respond to various environmental signals, such as but not limited to, light, CO2 or nitrogen, or to tolerate various environmental stresses such as, but not limited to, drought, excess moisture, chilling, freezing, high temperature, salt, and oxidative stress, also can be effected through expression of novel genes. As the chloroplast F16BP aldolase promoter of the instant invention can be induced by environmental light signals and perhaps by environmental stresses, genes conferring resistance to these conditions may find particular use with this promoter.
It is proposed that benefits may be realized in terms of increased resistance to freezing temperatures through the introduction of an “antifreeze” protein such as that of the Winter Flounder (Cutler et al., 1989) or synthetic gene derivatives thereof. Improved chilling tolerance also may be conferred through increased expression of glycerol-3-phosphate acetyltransferase in chloroplasts (Wolter et al., 1992). Resistance to oxidative stress (often exacerbated by conditions such as chilling temperatures in combination with high light intensities) can be conferred by expression of superoxide dismutase (Gupta et al., 1993), and may be improved by glutathione reductase (Bowler et al., 1992). Such strategies may allow for tolerance to freezing in newly emerged fields as well as extending later maturity higher yielding varieties to earlier relative maturity zones.
It is proposed that expression of a gene encoding hemoglobin may enhance a plant's ability to assimilate and utilize oxygen, resulting in quicker germination, faster growing or maturing crops, or higher crop yields (Holmberg et al. 1997).
It is contemplated that the expression of novel genes that favorably effect plant water content, total water potential, osmotic potential, and turgor will enhance the ability of the plant to tolerate drought. As used herein, the terms “drought resistance” and “drought tolerance” are used to refer to a plants increased resistance or tolerance to stress induced by a reduction in water availability, as compared to normal circumstances, and the ability of the plant to function and survive in lower-water environments. In this aspect of the invention it is proposed, for example, that the expression of genes encoding for the biosynthesis of osmotically-active solutes, such as polyol compounds, may impart protection against drought. Within this class are genes encoding for mannitol-L-phosphate dehydrogenase (Lee and Saier, 1983), trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (Kaasen et al., 1992), and myo-inositol O-methyl transferase (U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,324). Through the subsequent action of native phosphatases in the cell or by the introduction and coexpression of a specific phosphatase, these introduced genes will result in the accumulation of either mannitol or trehalose, respectively, both of which have been well documented as protective compounds able to mitigate the effects of stress. Mannitol accumulation in transgenic tobacco has been verified and preliminary results indicate that plants expressing high levels of this metabolite are able to tolerate an applied osmotic stress (Tarczynski et al., 1992, 1993). Altered water utilization in transgenic corn producing mannitol also has been demonstrated (U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,709).
Similarly, the efficacy of other metabolites in protecting either enzyme function (e.g., alanopine or propionic acid) or membrane integrity (e.g., alanopine) has been documented (Loomis et al., 1989), and therefore expression of genes encoding for the biosynthesis of these compounds might confer drought resistance in a manner similar to or complimentary to mannitol. Other examples of naturally occurring metabolites that are osmotically active and/or provide some direct protective effect during drought and/or desiccation include fructose, erythritol (Coxson et al., 1992), sorbitol, dulcitol (Karsten et al., 1992), glucosylglycerol (Reed et al., 1984; Erdmann et al., 1992), sucrose, stachyose (Koster and Leopold, 1988; Blackman et al., 1992), raffinose (Bernal-Lugo and Leopold, 1992), proline (Rensburg et al., 1993), glycine betaine, ononitol and pinitol (Vernon and Bohnert, 1992). Continued canopy growth and increased reproductive fitness during times of stress will be augmented by introduction and expression of genes such as those controlling the osmotically active compounds discussed above and other such compounds. Currently preferred genes which promote the synthesis of an osmotically active polyol compound are genes which encode the enzymes mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase, trehalose-6-phosphate synthase and myoinositol 0-methyltransferase.
It is contemplated that the expression of specific proteins also may increase drought tolerance. Three classes of Late Embryogenic Proteins have been assigned based on structural similarities (see Dure et al., 1989). All three classes of LEAs have been demonstrated in maturing (i.e., desiccating) seeds. Within these 3 types of LEA proteins, the Type-II (dehydrin-type) have generally been implicated in drought and/or desiccation tolerance in vegetative plant parts (i.e., Mundy and Chua, 1988; Piatkowski et al., 1990; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki et al., 1992). Recently, expression of a Type-III LEA (HVA-1) in tobacco was found to influence plant height, maturity and drought tolerance (Fitzpatrick, 1993). In rice, expression of the HVA-1 gene influenced tolerance to water deficit and salinity (Xu et al., 1996). Expression of structural genes from all three LEA groups may therefore confer drought tolerance. Other types of proteins induced during water stress include thiol proteases, aldolases and transmembrane transporters (Guerrero et al., 1990), which may confer various protective and/or repair-type functions during drought stress. It also is contemplated that genes that effect lipid biosynthesis and hence membrane composition might also be useful in conferring drought resistance on the plant.
Many of these genes for improving drought resistance have complementary modes of action. Thus, it is envisaged that combinations of these genes might have additive and/or synergistic effects in improving drought resistance in crop plants such as, for example, corn, soybean, cotton, or wheat. Many of these genes also improve freezing tolerance (or resistance); the physical stresses incurred during freezing and drought are similar in nature and may be mitigated in similar fashion. Benefit may be conferred via constitutive expression of these genes, but the preferred means of expressing these novel genes may be through the use of a turgor-induced promoter (such as the promoters for the turgor-induced genes described in Guerrero et al., 1990 and Shagan et al., 1993, which are incorporated herein by reference) or an ABA-inducible promoter such as the promoter of the present invention. Inducible, spatial and temporal expression patterns of these genes may enable plants to better withstand stress.
It is proposed that expression of genes that are involved with specific morphological traits that allow for increased water extractions from drying soil would be of benefit. For example, introduction and expression of genes that alter root characteristics may enhance water uptake. It also is contemplated that expression of genes that enhance reproductive fitness during times of stress would be of significant value. For example, expression of genes that improve the synchrony of pollen shed and receptiveness of the female flower parts, i.e., silks, would be of benefit. In addition it is proposed that expression of genes that minimize kernel abortion during times of stress would increase the amount of grain to be harvested and hence be of value.
Given the overall role of water in determining yield, it is contemplated that enabling corn and other crop plants to utilize water more efficiently, through the introduction and expression of novel genes, will improve overall performance even when soil water availability is not limiting. By introducing genes that improve the ability of plants to maximize water usage across a full range of stresses relating to water availability, yield stability or consistency of yield performance may be realized.
D. Disease Resistance
It is proposed that increased resistance to diseases may be realized through introduction of genes into plants, for example, into monocotyledonous plants such as maize. It is possible to produce resistance to diseases caused by viruses, bacteria, fungi and nematodes. It also is contemplated that control of mycotoxin producing organisms may be realized through expression of introduced genes.
Resistance to viruses may be produced through expression of novel genes. For example, it has been demonstrated that expression of a viral coat protein in a transgenic plant can impart resistance to infection of the plant by that virus and perhaps other closely related viruses (Cuozzo et al., 1988, Hemenway et al., 1988, Abel et al., 1986). It is contemplated that expression of antisense genes targeted at essential viral functions also may impart resistance to viruses. For example, an antisense gene targeted at the gene responsible for replication of viral nucleic acid may inhibit replication and lead to resistance to the virus. It is believed that interference with other viral functions through the use of antisense genes also may increase resistance to viruses. Similarly, ribozymes could be used in this context. Further, it is proposed that it may be possible to achieve resistance to viruses through other approaches, including, but not limited to the use of satellite viruses. Examples of viral and viral-like diseases, for which one could introduce resistance to in a transgenic plant in accordance with the instant invention, are listed below, in Table 2.







TABLE 2







Plant Virus and Virus-like Diseases








DISEASE
CAUSATIVE AGENT





American wheat striate
American wheat striate mosaic


(wheat striate mosaic)
virus mosaic (AWSMV)


Barley stripe mosaic
Barley stripe mosaic virus



(BSMV)


Barley yellow dwarf
Barley yellow dwarf virus



(BYDV)


Brome mosaic
Brome mosaic virus (BMV)


Cereal chlorotic mottle*
Cereal chlorotic mottle



virus (CCMV)


Corn chlorotic vein banding
Corn chlorotic vein banding


(Brazilian maize mosaic) 1
virus (CCVBV)


Corn lethal necrosis
Virus complex (Maize chlorotic



mottle virus(MCMV) and Maize



dwarf mosaic virus (MDMV) A



or B or Wheat streak mosaic



virus(WSMV))


Cucumber mosaic
Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV)


Cynodon chlorotic streak*, 1
Cynodon chlorotic streak



virus (CCSV)


Johnsongrass mosaic
Johnsongrass mosaic virus



(JGMV)


Maize bushy stunt
Mycoplasma-like organism



(MLO) associated


Maize chlorotic dwarf
Maize chlorotic dwarf virus



(MCDV)


Maize chlorotic mottle
Maize chlorotic mottle virus



(MCMV)


Maize dwarf mosaic
Maize dwarf mosaic virus



(MDMV) strains A, D, E and F


Maize leaf fleck
Maize leaf fleck virus



(MLFV)


Maize line*
Maize line virus (MLV)


Maize mosaic (corn leaf stripe,
Maize mosaic virus (MMV)


enanismo rayado)


Maize mottle and chlorotic
Maize mottle and chlorotic


stunt 1
stunt virus*


Maize pellucid ringspot*
Maize pellucid ringspot



virus (MPRV)


Maize raya gruesa*, 1
Maize raya gruesa virus



(MRGV)


maize rayado fino* (fine
Maize rayado fino virus


striping disease)
(MRFV)


Maize red leaf and red stripe*
Mollicute?


Maize red stripe*
Maize red stripe virus



(MRSV)


Maize ring mottle*
Maize ring mottle virus



(MRMV)


Maize rio IV*
Maize rio cuarto virus



(MRCV)


Maize rough dwarf* (nanismo
Maize rough dwarf virus


ruvido)
(MRDV) (= Cereal



tillering disease virus*)


Maize sterile stunt*
Maize sterile stunt virus



(strains of barley yellow



striate virus)


Maize streak*
Maize streak virus (MSV)


Maize stripe (maize chlorotic
Maize stripe virus


stripe, maize hoja blanca)


Maize stunting*, 1
Maize stunting virus


Maize tassel abortion*
Maize tassel abortion virus



(MTAV)


Maize vein enation*
Maize vein enation virus



(MVEV)


Maize wallaby ear*
Maize wallaby ear virus



(MWEV)


Maize white leaf*
Maize white leaf virus


Maize white line mosaic
Maize white line mosaic



virus (MWLMV)


Millet red leaf*
Millet red leaf virus



(MRLV)


Northern cereal mosaic*
Northern cereal mosaic



virus (NCMV)


Oat pseudorosette*
Oat pseudorosette virus


(zakuklivanie)


Oat sterile dwarf*
Oat sterile dwarf virus



(OSDV)


Rice black-streaked dwarf*
Rice black-streaked dwarf



virus (RBSDV)


Rice stripe*
Rice stripe virus (RSV)


Sorghum mosaic
Sorghum mosaic virus (SrMV),



formerly sugarcane mosaic



virus (SCMV) strains H, I



and M


Sugarcane Fiji disease*
Sugarcane Fiji disease virus



(FDV)


Sugarcane mosaic
Sugarcane mosaic virus



(SCMV) strains A, B,



D, E, SC, BC, Sabi and



MB (formerly MDMV-B)


Vein enation*, 1
Virus?


Wheat spot mosaic 1
Wheat spot mosaic virus



(WSMV)





*Not known to occur naturally on corn in the United States.


1 Minor viral disease.






It is proposed that increased resistance to diseases caused by bacteria and fungi also may be realized through introduction of novel genes. It is contemplated that genes encoding so-called “peptide antibiotics,” pathogenesis related (PR) proteins, toxin resistance, and proteins affecting host-pathogen interactions such as morphological characteristics will be useful. Peptide antibiotics are polypeptide sequences which are inhibitory to growth of bacteria and other microorganisms. For example, the classes of peptides referred to as cecropins and magainins inhibit growth of many species of bacteria and fungi. It is proposed that expression of PR proteins in monocotyledonous plants such as maize may be useful in conferring resistance to bacterial disease. These genes are induced following pathogen attack on a host plant and have been divided into at least five classes of proteins (Bol et al., 1990). Included amongst the PR proteins are β-1, 3-glucanases, chitinases, and osmotin and other proteins that are believed to function in plant resistance to disease organisms. Other genes have been identified that have antifungal properties, e.g., UDA (stinging nettle lectin), hevein (Broakaert et al., 1989; Barkai-Golan et al., 1978), and sor1 conferring resistance to photosensitizing toxins (Ehrenshaft et al., 1999). It is known that certain plant diseases are caused by the production of phytotoxins. It is proposed that resistance to these diseases would be achieved through expression of a novel gene that encodes an enzyme capable of degrading or otherwise inactivating the phytotoxin. It also is contemplated that expression of novel genes that alter the interactions between the host plant and pathogen may be useful in reducing the ability of the disease organism to invade the tissues of the host plant, e.g., an increase in the waxiness of the leaf cuticle or other morphological characteristics. Examples of bacterial and fungal diseases, including downy mildews, for which one could introduce resistance to in a transgenic plant in accordance with the instant invention, are listed below, in Tables 3, 4 and 5.







TABLE 3







Plant Bacterial Diseases










DISEASE
CAUSATIVE AGENT







Bacterial leaf blight
Pseudomonas avenae subsp.



and stalk rot
avenae



Bacterial leaf spot
Xanthomonas campestris pv.




holcicola



Bacterial stalk rot
Enterobacter dissolvens =




Erwinia dissolvens



Bacterial stalk and
Erwinia carotovora subsp.



top rot
carotovora, Erwinia




chrysanthemi pv. zeae



Bacterial stripe
Pseudomonas andropogonis



Chocolate spot
Pseudomonas syringae pv.




coronafaciens



Goss's bacterial wilt and
Clavibacter michiganensis



blight (leaf freckles
subsp. nebraskensis =



and wilt)
Corynebacterium michiganense




pv. nebraskense



Holcus spot
Pseudomonas syringae




pv. syringae



Purple leaf sheath
Hemiparasitic bacteria +




(See under Fungi)



Seed rot-seedling blight
Bacillus subtilis



Stewart's disease
Pantoea stewartii =



(bacterial wilt)
Erwinia stewartii



Corn stunt (achapparramiento,
Spiroplasma kunkelii



maize stunt, Mesa Central or



Rio Grande maize stunt)

















TABLE 4







Plant Fungal Diseases








DISEASE
PATHOGEN





Anthracnose leaf blight
Colletotrichum graminicola (teleomorph:


and anthracnose stalk
Glomerella graminicola Politis), Glomerella


rot
tucumanensis (anamorph: Glomerella falcatum



Went)


Aspergillus ear and
Aspergillus flavus Link: Fr.


kernel rot


Banded leaf and
Rhizoctonia solani Kühn = Rhizoctonia


sheath spot*
microsclerotia J. Matz (teleomorph:



Thanatephorus cucumeris)


Black bundle disease
Acremonium strictum W. Gams =



Cephalosporium acremonium Auct. non Corda


Black kernel rot*
Lasiodiplodia theobromae = Botryodiplodia



theobromae


Borde blanco*
Marasmiellus sp.


Brown spot (black
Physoderma maydis


spot, stalk rot)


Cephalosporium
Acremonium strictum = Cephalosporium


kernel rot
acremonium


Charcoal rot
Macrophomina phaseolina


Corticium ear rot*
Thanatephorus cucumeris = Corticium sasakii


Curvularia leaf spot
Curvularia clavata, C. eragrostidis, =



C. maculans (teleomorph: Cochliobolus



eragrostidis), Curvularia inaequalis,



C. intermedia (teleomorph: Cochliobolus



intermedius), Curvularia lunata (teleomorph:



Cochliobolus lunatus), Curvularia pallescens



(teleomorph: Cochliobolus pallescens),



Curvularia senegalensis, C. tuberculata



(teleomorph: Cochliobolus tuberculatus)


Didymella leaf spot*
Didymella exitalis


Diplodia ear rot and
Diplodia frumenti (teleomorph:


stalk rot
Botryosphaeria festucae)


Diplodia ear rot,
Diplodia maydis = Stenocarpella maydis


stalk rot, seed rot


and seedling blight


Diplodia leaf spot or
Stenocarpella macrospora = Diplodia


leaf streak
macrospora





*Not known to occur naturally on corn in the United States.













TABLE 5







Plant Downy Mildews








DISEASE
CAUSATIVE AGENT





Brown stripe downy
Sclerophthora rayssiae var. zeae


mildew*


Crazy top downy
Sclerophthora macrospora = Sclerospora


mildew
macrospora


Green ear downy
Sclerospora graminicola


mildew (graminicola


downy mildew)


Java downy mildew*
Peronosclerospora maydis = Sclerospora



maydis


Philippine downy
Peronosclerospora philippinensis =


mildew*
Sclerospora philippinensis


Sorghum downy
Peronosclerospora sorghi = Sclerospora


mildew
sorghi


Spontaneum downy
Peronosclerospora spontanea = Sclerospora


mildew*
spontanea


Sugarcane downy
Peronosclerospora sacchari = Sclerospora


mildew*
sacchari


Dry ear rot (cob,
Nigrospora oryzae (teleomorph: Khuskia


kernel and stalk rot)
oryzae)


Ear rots, minor
Alternaria alternata = A. tenuis, Aspergillus



glaucus, A. niger, Aspergillus spp., Botrytis



cinerea (teleomorph: Botryotinia fuckeliana),



Cunninghamella sp., Curvularia pallescens,



Doratomyces stemonitis = Cephalotrichum



stemonitis, Fusarium culmorum, Gonatobotrys



simplex, Pithomyces maydicus, Rhizopus



microsporus Tiegh., R. stolonifer =



R. nigricans, Scopulariopsis brumptii.


Ergot* (horse's tooth,
Claviceps gigantea (anamorph: Sphacelia sp.)


diente de caballo)


Eyespot
Aureobasidium zeae = Kabatiella zeae


Fusarium ear and
Fusarium subglutinans = F. moniliforme var.


stalk rot
subglutinans


Fusarium kernel, root
Fusarium moniliforme (teleomorph: Gibberella


and stalk rot, seed
fujikuroi)


rot and seedling


blight


Fusarium stalk rot,
Fusarium avenaceum (teleomorph: Gibberella


seedling root rot
avenacea)


Gibberella ear and
Gibberella zeae (anamorph: Fusarium


stalk rot
graminearum)


Gray ear rot
Botryosphaeria zeae = Physalospora zeae



(anamorph: Macrophoma zeae)


Gray leaf spot
Cercospora sorghi = C. sorghi var. maydis,


(Cercospora leaf spot)
C. zeae-maydis


Helminthosporium
Exserohilum pedicellatum = Helminthosporium


root rot
pedicellatum (teleomorph: Setosphaeria



pedicellata)


Hormodendrum ear rot
Cladosporium cladosporioides =


(Cladosporium rot)
Hormodendrum cladosporioides, C. herbarum



(teleomorph: Mycosphaerella tassiana)


Hyalothyridium leaf
Hyalothyridium maydis


spot*


Late wilt*
Cephalosporium maydis


Leaf spots, minor
Alternaria alternata, Ascochyta maydis,



A. tritici, A. zeicola, Bipolaris victoriae =



Helminthosporium victoriae (teleomorph:



Cochliobolus victoriae), C. sativus (anamorph:



Bipolaris sorokiniana = H. sorokinianum =



H. sativum), Epicoccum nigrum, Exserohilum



prolatum = Drechslera prolata (teleomorph:



Setosphaeria prolata) Graphium penicillioides,



Leptosphaeria maydis, Leptothyrium zeae,



Ophiosphaerella herpotricha, (anamorph:



Scolecosporiella sp.), Paraphaeosphaeria



michotii, Phoma sp., Septoria zeae, S. zeicola,



S. zeina


Northern corn leaf
Setosphaeria turcica (anamorph: Exserohilum


blight (white blast,
turcicum = Helminthosporium turcicum)


crown stalk rot,


stripe)


Northern corn leaf spot,
Cochliobolus carbonum (anamorph: Bipolaris


Helminthosporium ear
zeicola = Helminthosporium carbonum)


rot (race 1)


Penicillium ear rot
Penicillium spp., P. chrysogenum,


(blue eye, blue mold)
P. expansum, P. oxalicum


Phaeocytostroma stalk
Phaeocytostroma ambiguum, =


rot and root rot
Phaeocytosporella zeae


Phaeosphaeria leaf
Phaeosphaeria maydis = Sphaerulina maydis


spot*


Physalospora ear rot
Botryosphaeria festucae = Physalospora


(Botryosphaeria ear
zeicola (anamorph: Diplodia frumenti)


rot)


Purple leaf sheath
Hemiparasitic bacteria and fungi


Pyrenochaeta stalk
Phoma terrestris = Pyrenochaeta terrestris


rot and root rot


Pythium root rot
Pythium spp., P. arrhenomanes,



P. graminicola


Pythium stalk rot
Pythium aphanidermatum = P. butleri L.


Red kernel disease
Epicoccum nigrum


(ear mold, leaf and


seed rot)


Rhizoctonia ear rot
Rhizoctonia zeae (teleomorph: Waitea


(sclerotial rot)
circinata)


Rhizoctonia root rot
Rhizoctonia solani, Rhizoctonia zeae


and stalk rot


Root rots, minor
Alternaria alternata, Cercospora sorghi,



Dictochaeta fertilis, Fusarium acuminatum



(teleomorph: Gibberella acuminata),



F. equiseti (teleomorph: G. intricans),



F. oxysporum, F. pallidoroseum, F. poae,



F. roseum, G. cyanogena, (anamorph:



F. sulphureum), Microdochium bolleyi, Mucor



sp., Periconia circinata, Phytophthora



cactorum, P. drechsleri, P. nicotianae var.



parasitica, Rhizopus arrhizus


Rostratum leaf spot
Setosphaeria rostrata, (anamorph: Exserohilum


(Helminthosporium
rostratum = Helminthosporium rostratum)


leaf disease, ear


and stalk rot)


Rust, common corn
Puccinia sorghi


Rust, southern corn
Puccinia polysora


Rust, tropical corn
Physopella pallescens, P. zeae = Angiopsora



zeae


Sclerotium ear rot*
Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. (teleomorph: Athelia


(southern blight)
rolfsii)


Seed rot-seedling
Bipolaris sorokiniana, B. zeicola =


blight
Helminthosporium carbonum, Diplodia



maydis, Exserohilum pedicillatum,



Exserohilum turcicum = Helminthosporium



turcicum, Fusarium avenaceum, F. culmorum,



F. moniliforme, Gibberella zeae (anamorph.



F. graminearum), Macrophomina phaseolina,



Penicillium spp., Phomopsis sp., Pythium spp.,



Rhizoctonia solani, R. zeae, Sclerotium rolfsii,



Spicaria sp.


Selenophoma leaf
Selenophoma sp.


spot*


Sheath rot
Gaeumannomyces graminis


Shuck rot
Myrothecium gramineum


Silage mold
Monascus purpureus, M. ruber


Smut, common
Ustilago zeae = U. maydis)


Smut, false
Ustilaginoidea virens


Smut, head
Sphacelotheca reiliana = Sporisorium holci-



sorghi


Southern corn leaf
Cochliobolus heterostrophus (anamorph:


blight and stalk rot
Bipolaris maydis = Helminthosporium maydis)


Southern leaf spot
Stenocarpella macrospora = Diplodia



macrospora


Stalk rots, minor
Cercospora sorghi, Fusarium episphaeria,



F. merismoides, F. oxysporum Schlechtend,



F. poae, F. roseum, F. solani (teleomorph:



Nectria haematococca), F. tricinctum,



Mariannaea elegans, Mucor sp.,



Rhopographus zeae, Spicaria sp.


Storage rots
Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp. and other



fungi


Tar spot*
Phyllachora maydis


Trichoderma ear rot
Trichoderma viride = T. lignorum teleomorph:


and root rot
Hypocrea sp.


White ear rot, root
Stenocarpella maydis = Diplodia zeae


and stalk rot


Yellow leaf blight
Ascochyta ischaemi, Phyllosticta maydis



(teleomorph: Mycosphaerella zeae-maydis)


Zonate leaf spot
Gloeocercospora sorghi





*Not known to occur naturally on corn in the United States.






Plant parasitic nematodes are a cause of disease in many plants, including maize. It is proposed that it would be possible to make plants resistant to these organisms through the expression of novel gene products. It is anticipated that control of nematode infestations would be accomplished by altering the ability of the nematode to recognize or attach to a host plant and/or enabling the plant to produce nematicidal compounds, including but not limited to proteins. It is known that certain endotoxins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis are nematicidal (Bottjer et al., 1985; U.S. Pat. No. 5,831,011). Examples of nematode-associated plant diseases, for which one could introduce resistance to in a transgenic plant in accordance with the invention are given below, in Table 6.







TABLE 6







Parasitic Nematodes








DISEASE
PATHOGEN





Awl
Dolichodorus spp., D. heterocephalus


Bulb and stem
Ditylenchus dipsaci


(Europe)


Burrowing
Radopholus similis


Cyst
Heterodera avenae, H. zeae, Punctodera



chalcoensis


Dagger
Xiphinema spp., X. americanum,



X. mediterraneum


False ro0ot-knot
Nacobbus dorsalis


Lance, Columbia
Hoplolaimus columbus


Lance
Hoplolaimus spp., H. galeatus


Lesion
Pratylenchus spp., P. brachyurus, P. crenatus,



P. hexincisus, P. neglectus, P. penetrans,



P. scribneri, P. thornei, P. zeae


Needle
Longidorus spp., L. breviannulatus


Ring
Criconemella spp., C. ornata


Root-knot
Meloidogyne spp., M. chitwoodi, M. incognita,



M. javanica


Spiral
Helicotylenchus spp.


Sting
Belonolaimus spp., B. longicaudatus


Stubby-root
Paratrichodorus spp., P. christiei, P. minor,



Quinisulcius acutus, Trichodorus spp.


Stunt
Tylenchorhynchus dubius









E. Mycotoxin Reduction/Elimination
Production of mycotoxins, including aflatoxin and fumonisin, by fungi associated with monocotyledonous plants such as maize is a significant factor in rendering the grain not useful. These fungal organisms do not cause disease symptoms and/or interfere with the growth of the plant, but they produce chemicals (mycotoxins) that are toxic to animals. It is contemplated that inhibition of the growth of these fungi would reduce the synthesis of these toxic substances and therefore reduce grain losses due to mycotoxin contamination. It also is proposed that it may be possible to introduce novel genes into monocotyledonous plants such as maize that would inhibit synthesis of the mycotoxin. Further, it is contemplated that expression of a novel gene which encodes an enzyme capable of rendering the mycotoxin nontoxic would be useful in order to achieve reduced mycotoxin contamination of grain. The result of any of the above mechanisms would be a reduced presence of mycotoxins on grain.
F. Grain Composition or Quality
Genes may be introduced into monocotyledonous plants, particularly commercially important cereals such as maize, to improve the grain for which the cereal is primarily grown. A wide range of novel transgenic plants produced in this manner may be envisioned depending on the particular end use of the grain.
The largest use of maize grain is for feed or food. Introduction of genes that alter the composition of the grain may greatly enhance the feed or food value. The primary components of maize grain are starch, protein, and oil. Each of these primary components of maize grain may be improved by altering its level or composition. Several examples may be mentioned for illustrative purposes, but in no way provide an exhaustive list of possibilities.
The protein of cereal grains including maize is suboptimal for feed and food purposes especially when fed to monogastric animals such as pigs, poultry, and humans. The protein is deficient in several amino acids that are essential in the diet of these species, requiring the addition of supplements to the grain. Limiting essential amino acids may include lysine, methionine, tryptophan, threonine, valine, arginine, and histidine. Some amino acids become limiting only after corn is supplemented with other inputs for feed formulations. For example, when corn is supplemented with soybean meal to meet lysine requirements methionine becomes limiting. The levels of these essential amino acids in seeds and grain may be elevated by mechanisms which include, but are not limited to, the introduction of genes to increase the biosynthesis of the amino acids, decrease the degradation of the amino acids, increase the storage of the amino acids in proteins, direct the storage of amino acids in proteins comprising a nutritionally enhanced balance of amino acids, or increase transport of the amino acids to the seeds or grain.
One mechanism for increasing the biosynthesis of the amino acids is to introduce genes that deregulate the amino acid biosynthetic pathways such that the plant can no longer adequately control the levels that are produced. This may be done by deregulating or bypassing steps in the amino acid biosynthetic pathway which are normally regulated by levels of the amino acid end product of the pathway. Examples include the introduction of genes that encode deregulated versions of the enzymes aspartokinase or dihydrodipicolinic acid (DHDP)-synthase for increasing lysine and threonine production, and anthranilate synthase for increasing tryptophan production. Reduction of the catabolism of the amino acids may be accomplished by introduction of DNA sequences that reduce or eliminate the expression of genes encoding enzymes that catalyze steps in the catabolic pathways such as the enzyme lysine-ketoglutarate reductase. It is anticipated that it may be desirable to target expression of genes relating to amino acid biosynthesis to the endosperm or embryo of the seed. More preferably, the gene will be targeted to the embryo. It will also be preferable for genes encoding proteins involved in amino acid biosynthesis to target the protein to a plastid using a plastid transit peptide sequence.
The protein composition of the grain may be altered to improve the balance of amino acids in a variety of ways including elevating expression of native proteins, decreasing expression of those with poor composition, changing the composition of native proteins, or introducing genes encoding entirely new proteins possessing superior composition. Examples may include the introduction of DNA that decreases the expression of members of the zein family of storage proteins. This DNA may encode ribozymes or antisense sequences directed to impairing expression of zein proteins or expression of regulators of zein expression such as the opaque-2 gene product. It also is proposed that the protein composition of the grain may be modified through the phenomenon of co-suppression, i.e., inhibition of expression of an endogenous gene through the expression of an identical structural gene or gene fragment introduced through transformation (Goring et al., 1991; PCT Publication WO 98/26064). Additionally, the introduced DNA may encode enzymes which degrade zeins. The decreases in zein expression that are achieved may be accompanied by increases in proteins with more desirable amino acid composition or increases in other major seed constituents such as starch. Alternatively, a chimeric gene may be introduced that comprises a coding sequence for a native protein of adequate amino acid composition such as for one of the globulin proteins or 10 kD delta zein or 20 kD delta zein or 27 kD gamma zein of maize and a promoter or other regulatory sequence designed to elevate expression of said protein. The coding sequence of the gene may include additional or replacement codons for essential amino acids. Further, a coding sequence obtained from another species, or, a partially or completely synthetic sequence encoding a completely unique peptide sequence designed to enhance the amino acid composition of the seed may be employed. It is anticipated that it may be preferable to target expression of these transgenes encoding proteins with superior composition to the endosperm of the seed.
The introduction of genes that alter the oil content of the grain may be of value. Increases in oil content may result in increases in metabolizable-energy-content and density of the seeds for use in feed and food. The introduced genes may encode enzymes that remove or reduce rate-limitations or regulated steps in fatty acid or lipid biosynthesis. Such genes may include, but are not limited to, those that encode acetyl-CoA carboxylase, ACP-acyltransferase, β-ketoacyl-ACP synthase, plus other well known fatty acid biosynthetic activities. Other possibilities are genes that encode proteins that do not possess enzymatic activity such as acyl carrier protein. Genes may be introduced that alter the balance of fatty acids present in the oil providing a more healthful or nutritive feedstuff. The introduced DNA also may encode sequences that block expression of enzymes involved in fatty acid biosynthesis, altering the proportions of fatty acids present in the grain such as described below. Some other examples of genes specifically contemplated by the inventors for use in creating transgenic plants with altered oil composition traits include 2-acetyltransferase, oleosin, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, acetyl CoA synthetase, ATP citrate lyase, ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase and genes of the carnitine-CoA-acetyl-CoA shuttles. It is anticipated that expression of genes related to oil biosynthesis will be targeted to the plastid, using a plastid transit peptide sequence and preferably expressed in the seed embryo.
Genes may be introduced that enhance the nutritive value of the starch component of the grain, for example by increasing the degree of branching, resulting in improved utilization of the starch, for example, in cows by delaying its metabolism. It is contemplated that alteration of starch structure may improve the wet milling properties of grain or may produce a starch composition with improved qualities for industrial utilization. It is anticipated that expression of genes related to starch biosynthesis will preferably be targeted to the endosperm of the seed.
Besides affecting the major constituents of the grain, genes may be introduced that affect a variety of other nutritive, processing, or other quality aspects of the grain as used for feed or food. For example, pigmentation of the grain may be increased or decreased. Enhancement and stability of yellow pigmentation is desirable in some animal feeds and may be achieved by introduction of genes that result in enhanced production of xanthophylls and carotenes by eliminating rate-limiting steps in their production. Such genes may encode altered forms of the enzymes phytoene synthase, phytoene desaturase, or lycopene synthase. Alternatively, unpigmented white corn is desirable for production of many food products and may be produced by the introduction of DNA which blocks or eliminates steps in pigment production pathways.
Most of the phosphorous content of the grain is in the form of phytate, a form of phosphate storage that is not metabolized by monogastric animals. Therefore, in order to increase the availability of seed phosphate, it is anticipated that one will desire to decrease the amount of phytate in seed and increase the amount of free phosphorous. It is anticipated that one can decrease the expression or activity of one of the enzymes involved in the synthesis of phytate. For example, suppression of expression of the gene encoding inositol phosphate synthetase (INOPS) may lead to an overall reduction in phytate accumulation. It is anticipated that antisense or sense suppression of gene expression may be used. Alternatively, one may express a gene in corn seed which will be activated, e.g., by pH, in the gastric system of a monogastric animal and will release phosphate from phytate, e.g., phytase. It is further contemplated that one may provide an alternate storage form for phosphate in the grain, wherein the storage form is more readily utilized by a monogastric animal.
Feed or food comprising primarily maize or other cereal grains possesses insufficient quantities of vitamins and must be supplemented to provide adequate nutritive value. Introduction of genes that enhance vitamin biosynthesis in seeds may be envisioned including, for example, vitamins A, E, B12, choline, and the like. Maize grain also does not possess sufficient mineral content for optimal nutritive value. Genes that affect the accumulation or availability of compounds containing phosphorus, sulfur, calcium, manganese, zinc, and iron among others would be valuable. An example may be the introduction of a gene that reduced phytic acid production or encoded the enzyme phytase which enhances phytic acid breakdown. These genes would increase levels of available phosphate in the diet, reducing the need for supplementation with mineral phosphate.
Numerous other examples of improvement of maize or other cereals for feed and food purposes might be described. The improvements may not even necessarily involve the grain, but may, for example, improve the value of the corn for silage. Introduction of DNA to accomplish this might include sequences that alter lignin production such as those that result in the “brown midrib” phenotype associated with superior feed value for cattle.
In addition to direct improvements in feed or food value, genes also may be introduced which improve the processing of corn and improve the value of the products resulting from the processing. The primary method of processing corn is via wetmilling. Maize may be improved though the expression of novel genes that increase the efficiency and reduce the cost of processing such as by decreasing steeping time.
Improving the value of wetmilling products may include altering the quantity or quality of starch, oil, corn gluten meal, or the components of corn gluten feed. Elevation of starch may be achieved through the identification and elimination of rate limiting steps in starch biosynthesis or by decreasing levels of the other components of the grain resulting in proportional increases in starch. An example of the former may be the introduction of genes encoding ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase enzymes with altered regulatory activity or which are expressed at higher level. Examples of the latter may include selective inhibitors of, for example, protein or oil biosynthesis expressed during later stages of kernel development.
The properties of starch may be beneficially altered by changing the ratio of amylose to amylopectin, the size of the starch molecules, or their branching pattern. Through these changes a broad range of properties may be modified which include, but are not limited to, changes in gelatinization temperature, heat of gelatinization, clarity of films and pastes, rheological properties, and the like. To accomplish these changes in properties, genes that encode granule-bound or soluble starch synthase activity or branching enzyme activity may be introduced alone or combination. DNA such as antisense constructs also may be used to decrease levels of endogenous activity of these enzymes. The introduced genes or constructs may possess regulatory sequences that time their expression to specific intervals in starch biosynthesis and starch granule development. Furthermore, it may be worthwhile to introduce and express genes that result in the in vivo derivatization, or other modification, of the glucose moieties of the starch molecule. The covalent attachment of any molecule may be envisioned, limited only by the existence of enzymes that catalyze the derivatizations and the accessibility of appropriate substrates in the starch granule. Examples of important derivations may include the addition of functional groups such as amines, carboxyls, or phosphate groups which provide sites for subsequent in vitro derivatizations or affect starch properties through the introduction of ionic charges. Examples of other modifications may include direct changes of the glucose units such as loss of hydroxyl groups or their oxidation to aldehyde or carboxyl groups.
Oil is another product of wetmilling of corn, the value of which may be improved by introduction and expression of genes. The quantity of oil that can be extracted by wetmilling may be elevated by approaches as described for feed and food above. Oil properties also may be altered to improve its performance in the production and use of cooking oil, shortenings, lubricants or other oil-derived products or improvement of its health attributes when used in the food-related applications. Novel fatty acids also may be synthesized which upon extraction can serve as starting materials for chemical syntheses. The changes in oil properties may be achieved by altering the type, level, or lipid arrangement of the fatty acids present in the oil. This in turn may be accomplished by the addition of genes that encode enzymes that catalyze the synthesis of novel fatty acids and the lipids possessing them or by increasing levels of native fatty acids while possibly reducing levels of precursors. Alternatively, DNA sequences may be introduced which slow or block steps in fatty acid biosynthesis resulting in the increase in precursor fatty acid intermediates. Genes that might be added include desaturases, epoxidases, hydratases, dehydratases, and other enzymes that catalyze reactions involving fatty acid intermediates. Representative examples of catalytic steps that might be blocked include the desaturations from stearic to oleic acid and oleic to linolenic acid resulting in the respective accumulations of stearic and oleic acids. Another example is the blockage of elongation steps resulting in the accumulation of C8 to C12 saturated fatty acids.
Improvements in the other major corn wetmilling products, corn gluten meal and corn gluten feed, also may be achieved by the introduction of genes to obtain novel corn plants. Representative possibilities include but are not limited to those described above for improvement of food and feed value.
In addition, it may further be considered that the corn plant be used for the production or manufacturing of useful biological compounds that were either not produced at all, or not produced at the same level, in the corn plant previously. The novel corn plants producing these compounds are made possible by the introduction and expression of genes by corn transformation methods. The vast array of possibilities include but are not limited to any biological compound which is presently produced by any organism such as proteins, nucleic acids, primary and intermediary metabolites, carbohydrate polymers, etc. The compounds may be produced by the plant, extracted upon harvest and/or processing, and used for any presently recognized useful purpose such as pharmaceuticals, fragrances, and industrial enzymes to name a few.
Further possibilities to exemplify the range of grain traits or properties potentially encoded by introduced genes in transgenic plants include grain with less breakage susceptibility for export purposes or larger grit size when processed by dry milling through introduction of genes that enhance γ-zein synthesis, popcorn with improved popping quality and expansion volume through genes that increase pericarp thickness, corn with whiter grain for food uses though introduction of genes that effectively block expression of enzymes involved in pigment production pathways, and improved quality of alcoholic beverages or sweet corn through introduction of genes which affect flavor such as the shrunken 1 gene (encoding sucrose synthase) or shrunken 2 gene (encoding ADPG pyrophosphorylase) for sweet corn.
G. Plant Agronomic Characteristics
Two of the factors determining where crop plants can be grown are the average daily temperature during the growing season and the length of time between frosts. Within the areas where it is possible to grow a particular crop, there are varying limitations on the maximal time the crop has available to grow to maturity and be harvested. For example, maize to be grown in a particular area is selected for its ability to mature and dry down to harvestable moisture content within the required period of time with maximum possible yield. Therefore, corn of varying maturities is developed for different growing locations. Apart from the need to dry down sufficiently to permit harvest, it is desirable to have maximal drying take place in the field to minimize the amount of energy required for additional post-harvest drying. Also, the more readily the grain can dry down, the more time there is available for growth and seed maturation. It is considered that genes that influence maturity and/or dry down can be identified and introduced into corn or other plants using transformation techniques to create new varieties adapted to different growing locations or the same growing location, but having improved yield to moisture ratio at harvest. Expression of genes that are involved in regulation of plant development may be especially useful, e.g., the liguleless and rough sheath genes that have been identified in corn.
It is contemplated that genes may be introduced into plants that would improve standability and other plant growth characteristics. Expression of novel genes in maize which confer stronger stalks, improved root systems, or prevent or reduce ear droppage would be of great value to the farmer. It is proposed that introduction and expression of genes that increase the total amount of photoassimilate available by, for example, increasing light distribution and/or interception would be advantageous. In addition, the expression of genes that increase the efficiency of photosynthesis and/or the leaf canopy would further increase gains in productivity. It is contemplated that expression of a phytochrome gene in corn may be advantageous. Expression of such a gene may reduce apical dominance, confer semidwarfism on a plant, and increase shade tolerance (U.S. Pat. No. 5,268,526). Such approaches would allow for increased plant populations in the field.
Delay of late season vegetative senescence would increase the flow of assimilate into the grain and thus increase yield. It is proposed that overexpression of genes within corn that are associated with “stay green” or the expression of any gene that delays senescence would be advantageous. For example, a nonyellowing mutant has been identified in Festuca pratensis (Davies et al., 1990). Expression of this gene as well as others may prevent premature breakdown of chlorophyll and thus maintain canopy function.
H. Nutrient Utilization
The ability to utilize available nutrients may be a limiting factor in growth of monocotyledonous plants such as maize. It is proposed that it would be possible to alter nutrient uptake, tolerate pH extremes, mobilization through the plant, storage pools, and availability for metabolic activities by the introduction of novel genes. These modifications would allow a plant such as maize to more efficiently utilize available nutrients. It is contemplated that an increase in the activity of, for example, an enzyme that is normally present in the plant and involved in nutrient utilization would increase the availability of a nutrient. An example of such an enzyme would be phytase. It further is contemplated that enhanced nitrogen utilization by a plant is desirable. Expression of a glutamate dehydrogenase gene in corn, e.g., E. coli gdhA genes, may lead to increased fixation of nitrogen in organic compounds. Furthermore, expression of gdhA in corn may lead to enhanced resistance to the herbicide glufosinate by incorporation of excess ammonia into glutamate, thereby detoxifying the ammonia. It also is contemplated that expression of a novel gene may make a nutrient source available that was previously not accessible, e.g., an enzyme that releases a component of nutrient value from a more complex molecule, perhaps a macromolecule. It would be beneficial to utilize an inducible constitutive promoter such as the chloroplast F1 6BP aldolase promoter to express nutrient utilization genes as described in but not limited to this discussion, in a manner in which expression was enhanced by light.
I. Male Sterility
Male sterility is useful in the production of hybrid seed. It is proposed that male sterility may be produced through expression of novel genes. For example, it has been shown that expression of genes that encode proteins that interfere with development of the male inflorescence and/or gametophyte result in male sterility. Chimeric ribonuclease genes that express in the anthers of transgenic tobacco and oilseed rape have been demonstrated to lead to male sterility (Mariani et al., 1990).
A number of mutations were discovered in maize that confer cytoplasmic male sterility. One mutation in particular, referred to as T cytoplasm, also correlates with sensitivity to Southern corn leaf blight. A DNA sequence, designated TURF-13 (Levings, 1990), was identified that correlates with T cytoplasm. It is proposed that it would be possible through the introduction of TURF-13 via transformation, to separate male sterility from disease sensitivity. As it is necessary to be able to restore male fertility for breeding purposes and for grain production, it is proposed that genes encoding restoration of male fertility also may be introduced.
J. Negative Selectable Markers
Introduction of genes encoding traits that can be selected against may be useful for eliminating undesirable linked genes. It is contemplated that when two or more genes are introduced together by cotransformation that the genes will be linked together on the host chromosome. For example, a gene encoding Bt that confers insect resistance on the plant may be introduced into a plant together with a bar gene that is useful as a selectable marker and confers resistance to the herbicide Liberty® on the plant. However, it may not be desirable to have an insect resistant plant that also is resistant to the herbicide Liberty®. It is proposed that one also could introduce an antisense bar coding region that is expressed in those tissues where one does not want expression of the bar gene product, e.g., in whole plant parts. Hence, although the bar gene is expressed and is useful as a selectable marker, it is not useful to confer herbicide resistance on the whole plant. The bar antisense gene is a negative selectable marker.
It also is contemplated that negative selection is necessary in order to screen a population of transformants for rare homologous recombinants generated through gene targeting. For example, a homologous recombinant may be identified through the inactivation of a gene that was previously expressed in that cell. The antisense construct for neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPT II) has been investigated as a negative selectable marker in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and Arabidopsis thaliana (Xiang. and Guerra, 1993). In this example, both sense and antisense NPT II genes are introduced into a plant through transformation and the resultant plants are sensitive to the antibiotic kanamycin. An introduced gene that integrates into the host cell chromosome at the site of the antisense NPT II gene, and inactivates the antisense gene, will make the plant resistant to kanamycin and other aminoglycoside antibiotics. Therefore, rare, site-specific recombinants may be identified by screening for antibiotic resistance. Similarly, any gene, native to the plant or introduced through transformation, that when inactivated confers resistance to a compound, may be useful as a negative selectable marker.
It is contemplated that negative selectable markers also may be useful in other ways. One application is to construct transgenic lines in which one could select for transposition to unlinked sites. In the process of tagging it is most common for the transposable element to move to a genetically linked site on the same chromosome. A selectable marker for recovery of rare plants in which transposition has occurred to an unlinked locus would be useful. For example, the enzyme cytosine deaminase may be useful for this purpose. In the presence of this enzyme the non-phytotoxic compound 5-fluorocytosine is converted to 5-fluorouracil which is toxic to plant and animal cells. If a transposable element is linked to the gene for the enzyme cytosine deaminase, one may select for transposition to unlinked sites by selecting for transposition events in which the resultant plant is now resistant to 5-fluorocytosine. The parental plants and plants containing transpositions to linked sites will remain sensitive to 5-fluorocytosine. Resistance to 5-fluorocytosine is due to loss of the cytosine deaminase gene through genetic segregation of the transposable element and the cytosine deaminase gene. Other genes that encode proteins that render the plant sensitive to a certain compound will also be useful in this context. For example, T-DNA gene 2 from Agrobacterium tumefaciens encodes a protein that catalyzes the conversion of α-naphthalene acetamide (NAM) to α-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) renders plant cells sensitive to high concentrations of NAM (Depicker et al., 1988).
It also is contemplated that negative selectable markers may be useful in the construction of transposon tagging lines. For example, by marking an autonomous transposable element such as Ac, Master Mu, or En/Spn with a negative selectable marker, one could select for transformants in which the autonomous element is not stably integrated into the genome. It is proposed that this would be desirable, for example, when transient expression of the autonomous element is desired to activate in trans the transposition of a defective transposable element, such as Ds, but stable integration of the autonomous element is not desired. The presence of the autonomous element may not be desired in order to stabilize the defective element, i.e., prevent it from further transposing. However, it is proposed that if stable integration of an autonomous transposable element is desired in a plant the presence of a negative selectable marker may make it possible to eliminate the autonomous element during the breeding process.
K. Non-Protein-Expressing Sequences
DNA may be introduced into plants for the purpose of expressing RNA transcripts that function to affect plant phenotype yet are not translated into protein. Two examples are antisense RNA and RNA with ribozyme activity. Both may serve possible functions in reducing or eliminating expression of native or introduced plant genes. However, as detailed below, DNA need not be expressed to effect the phenotype of a plant.

    
    
        1. Antisense RNA
    
    


Genes may be constructed or isolated, which when transcribed, produce antisense RNA that is complementary to all or part(s) of a targeted messenger RNA(s). The antisense RNA reduces production of the polypeptide product of the messenger RNA. The polypeptide product may be any protein encoded by the plant genome. The aforementioned genes will be referred to as antisense genes. An antisense gene may thus be introduced into a plant by transformation methods to produce a novel transgenic plant with reduced expression of a selected protein of interest. For example, the protein may be an enzyme that catalyzes a reaction in the plant. Reduction of the enzyme activity may reduce or eliminate products of the reaction which include any enzymatically synthesized compound in the plant such as fatty acids, amino acids, carbohydrates, nucleic acids and the like. Alternatively, the protein may be a storage protein, such as a zein, or a structural protein, the decreased expression of which may lead to changes in seed amino acid composition or plant morphological changes respectively. The possibilities cited above are provided only by way of example and do not represent the full range of applications.

    
    
        2. Ribozymes
    
    


Genes also may be constructed or isolated, which when transcribed, produce RNA enzymes (ribozymes) which can act as endoribonucleases and catalyze the cleavage of RNA molecules with selected sequences. The cleavage of selected messenger RNAs can result in the reduced production of their encoded polypeptide products. These genes may be used to prepare novel transgenic plants which possess them. The transgenic plants may possess reduced levels of polypeptides including, but not limited to, the polypeptides cited above.
Ribozymes are RNA-protein complexes that cleave nucleic acids in a site-specific fashion. Ribozymes have specific catalytic domains that possess endonuclease activity (Kim and Cech, 1987; Gerlach et al., 1987; Forster and Symons, 1987). For example, a large number of ribozymes accelerate phosphoester transfer reactions with a high degree of specificity, often cleaving only one of several phosphoesters in an oligonucleotide substrate (Cech et al., 1981; Michel and Westhof, 1990; Reinhold-Hurek and Shub, 1992). This specificity has been attributed to the requirement that the substrate bind via specific base-pairing interactions to the internal guide sequence (“IGS”) of the ribozyme prior to chemical reaction.
Ribozyme catalysis has primarily been observed as part of sequence-specific cleavage/ligation reactions involving nucleic acids (Joyce, 1989; Cech et al., 1981). For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,354,855 reports that certain ribozymes can act as endonucleases with a sequence specificity greater than that of known ribonucleases and approaching that of the DNA restriction enzymes.
Several different ribozyme motifs have been described with RNA cleavage activity (Symons, 1992). Examples include sequences from the Group I self splicing introns including Tobacco Ringspot Virus (Prody et al., 1986), Avocado Sunblotch Viroid (Palukaitis et al., 1979; Symons, 1981), and Lucerne Transient Streak Virus (Forster and Symons, 1987). Sequences from these and related viruses are referred to as hammerhead ribozyme based on a predicted folded secondary structure.
Other suitable ribozymes include sequences from RNase P with RNA cleavage activity (Yuan et al., 1992, Yuan and Altman, 1994, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,168,053 and 5,624,824), hairpin ribozyme structures (Berzal-Herranz et al., 1992, Chowrira et al., 1993) and Hepatitis Delta virus based ribozymes (U.S. Pat. No. 5,625,047). The general design and optimization of ribozyme directed RNA cleavage activity has been discussed in detail (Haseloff and Gerlach, 1988, Symons, 1992, Chowrira et al., 1994; Thompson et al., 1995).
The other variable on ribozyme design is the selection of a cleavage site on a given target RNA. Ribozymes are targeted to a given sequence by virtue of annealing to a site by complimentary base pair interactions. Two stretches of homology are required for this targeting. These stretches of homologous sequences flank the catalytic ribozyme structure defined above. Each stretch of homologous sequence can vary in length from 7 to 15 nucleotides. The only requirement for defining the homologous sequences is that, on the target RNA, they are separated by a specific sequence which is the cleavage site. For hammerhead ribozyme, the cleavage site is a dinucleotide sequence on the target RNA is a uracil (U) followed by either an adenine, cytosine or uracil (A,C or U) (Perriman et al., 1992; Thompson et al., 1995). The frequency of this dinucleotide occurring in any given RNA is statistically 3 out of 16. Therefore, for a given target messenger RNA of 1000 bases, 187 dinucleotide cleavage sites are statistically possible.
Designing and testing ribozymes for efficient cleavage of a target RNA is a process well known to those skilled in the art. Examples of scientific methods for designing and testing ribozymes are described by Chowrira et al., (1994) and Lieber and Strauss (1995), each incorporated by reference. The identification of operative and preferred sequences for use in down regulating a given gene is simply a matter of preparing and testing a given sequence, and is a routinely practiced “screening” method known to those of skill in the art.

    
    
        3. Induction of Gene Silencing
    
    


It also is possible that genes may be introduced to produce novel transgenic plants which have reduced expression of a native gene product by the mechanism of co-suppression. It has been demonstrated in tobacco, tomato, petunia, and corn (Goring et al., 1991; Smith et al., 1990; Napoli et al., 1990; van der Krol et al., 1990; PCT Publication WO 98/26064) that expression of the sense transcript of a native gene will reduce or eliminate expression of the native gene in a manner similar to that observed for antisense genes. The introduced gene may encode all or part of the targeted native protein but its translation may not be required for reduction of levels of that native protein.

    
    
        4. Non-RNA-Expressing Sequences
    
    


DNA elements including those of transposable elements such as Ds, Ac, or Mu, may be inserted into a gene to cause mutations. These DNA elements may be inserted in order to inactivate (or activate) a gene and thereby “tag” a particular trait. In this instance the transposable element does not cause instability of the tagged mutation, because the utility of the element does not depend on its ability to move in the genome. Once a desired trait is tagged, the introduced DNA sequence may be used to clone the corresponding gene, e.g., using the introduced DNA sequence as a PCR primer target sequence together with PCR gene cloning techniques (Shapiro, 1983; Dellaporta et al., 1988). Once identified, the entire gene(s) for the particular trait, including control or regulatory regions where desired, may be isolated, cloned and manipulated as desired. The utility of DNA elements introduced into an organism for purposes of gene tagging is independent of the DNA sequence and does not depend on any biological activity of the DNA sequence, i.e., transcription into RNA or translation into protein. The sole function of the DNA element is to disrupt the DNA sequence of a gene.
It is contemplated that unexpressed DNA sequences, including novel synthetic sequences, could be introduced into cells as proprietary “labels” of those cells and plants and seeds thereof It would not be necessary for a label DNA element to disrupt the function of a gene endogenous to the host organism, as the sole function of this DNA would be to identify the origin of the organism. For example, one could introduce a unique DNA sequence into a plant and this DNA element would identify all cells, plants, and progeny of these cells as having arisen from that labeled source. It is proposed that inclusion of label DNAs would enable one to distinguish proprietary germplasm or germplasm derived from such, from unlabelled germplasm.
Another possible element which may be introduced is a matrix attachment region element (MAR), such as the chicken lysozyme A element (Stief et al., 1989), which can be positioned around an expressible gene of interest to effect an increase in overall expression of the gene and diminish position dependent effects upon incorporation into the plant genome (Stief et al., 1989; Phi-Van et al., 1990).
IV. Assays of Transgene Expression
Assays may be employed with the instant invention for determination of the relative efficiency of transgene expression. For example, assays may be used to determine the efficacy of deletion mutants of the chloroplast F16BP aldolase promoter in directing expression of exogenous proteins. Similarly, one could produce random or site-specific mutants of the chloroplast F16BP aldolase promoter of the invention and assay the efficacy of the mutants in the expression of a given transgene. Alternatively, assays could be used to determine the efficacy of the chloroplast F16BP aldolase promoter in directing protein expression when used in conjunction with various different enhancers, terminators or other types of elements potentially used in the preparation of transformation constructs.
For plants, expression assays may comprise a system utilizing embryogenic or non-embryogenic cells, or alternatively, whole plants. An advantage of using cellular assays is that regeneration of large numbers of plants is not required. However, the systems are limited in that promoter activity in the non-regenerated cells may not directly correlate with expression in a plant. Additionally, assays of tissue or developmental specific promoters are generally not feasible.
The biological sample to be assayed may comprise nucleic acids isolated from the cells of any plant material according to standard methodologies (Sambrook et al., 1989). The nucleic acid may be genomic DNA or fractionated or whole cell RNA. Where RNA is used, it may be desired to convert the RNA to a complementary DNA. In one embodiment of the invention, the RNA is whole cell RNA; in another, it is poly-A RNA. Normally, the nucleic acid is amplified.
Depending on the format, the specific nucleic acid of interest is identified in the sample directly using amplification or with a second, known nucleic acid following amplification. Next, the identified product is detected. In certain applications, the detection may be performed by visual means (e.g., ethidium bromide staining of a gel). Alternatively, the detection may involve indirect identification of the product via chemiluminescence, radioactive scintigraphy of radiolabel or fluorescent label or even via a system using electrical or thermal impulse signals (Affymax Technology; Bellus, 1994).
Following detection, one may compare the results seen in a given plant with a statistically significant reference group of non-transformed control plants. Typically, the non-transformed control plants will be of a genetic background similar to the transformed plants. In this way, it is possible to detect differences in the amount or kind of protein detected in various transformed plants. Alternatively, clonal cultures of cells, for example, callus or an immature embryo, may be compared to other cells samples.
As indicated, a variety of different assays are contemplated in the screening of cells or plants of the current invention and associated promoters. These techniques may in cases be used to detect for both the presence and expression of the particular genes as well as rearrangements that may have occurred in the gene construct. The techniques include but are not limited to, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), direct DNA sequencing, pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis, Southern or Northern blotting, single-stranded conformation analysis (SSCA), RNase protection assay, allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO), dot blot analysis, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, RFLP and PCR-SSCP.
A. Quantitation of Gene Expression with Relative Quantitative RT-PCR
Reverse transcription (RT) of RNA to cDNA followed by relative quantitative PCR (RT-PCR) can be used to determine the relative concentrations of specific mRNA species isolated from plants. By determining that the concentration of a specific mRNA species varies, it is shown that the gene encoding the specific mRNA species is differentially expressed. In this way, a promoters expression profile can be rapidly identified, as can the efficacy with which the promoter directs transgene expression.
In PCR, the number of molecules of the amplified target DNA increase by a factor approaching two with every cycle of the reaction until some reagent becomes limiting. Thereafter, the rate of amplification becomes increasingly diminished until there is no increase in the amplified target between cycles. If a graph is plotted in which the cycle number is on the X axis and the log of the concentration of the amplified target DNA is on the Y axis, a curved line of characteristic shape is formed by connecting the plotted points. Beginning with the first cycle, the slope of the line is positive and constant. This is said to be the linear portion of the curve. After a reagent becomes limiting, the slope of the line begins to decrease and eventually becomes zero. At this point the concentration of the amplified target DNA becomes asymptotic to some fixed value. This is said to be the plateau portion of the curve.
The concentration of the target DNA in the linear portion of the PCR amplification is directly proportional to the starting concentration of the target before the reaction began. By determining the concentration of the amplified products of the target DNA in PCR reactions that have completed the same number of cycles and are in their linear ranges, it is possible to determine the relative concentrations of the specific target sequence in the original DNA mixture. If the DNA mixtures are cDNAs synthesized from RNAs isolated from different tissues or cells, the relative abundances of the specific mRNA from which the target sequence was derived can be determined for the respective tissues or cells. This direct proportionality between the concentration of the PCR products and the relative mRNA abundances is only true in the linear range of the PCR reaction.
The final concentration of the target DNA in the plateau portion of the curve is determined by the availability of reagents in the reaction mix and is independent of the original concentration of target DNA. Therefore, the first condition that must be met before the relative abundances of a mRNA species can be determined by RT-PCR for a collection of RNA populations is that the concentrations of the amplified PCR products must be sampled when the PCR reactions are in the linear portion of their curves.
The second condition that must be met for an RT-PCR study to successfully determine the relative abundances of a particular mRNA species is that relative concentrations of the amplifiable cDNAs must be normalized to some independent standard. The goal of an RT-PCR study is to determine the abundance of a particular mRNA species relative to the average abundance of all mRNA species in the sample.
Most protocols for competitive PCR utilize internal PCR standards that are approximately as abundant as the target. These strategies are effective if the products of the PCR amplifications are sampled during their linear phases. If the products are sampled when the reactions are approaching the plateau phase, then the less abundant product becomes relatively over represented. Comparisons of relative abundances made for many different RNA samples, such as is the case when examining RNA samples for differential expression, become distorted in such a way as to make differences in relative abundances of RNAs appear less than they actually are. This is not a significant problem if the internal standard is much more abundant than the target. If the internal standard is more abundant than the target, then direct linear comparisons can be made between RNA samples.
The above discussion describes theoretical considerations for an RT-PCR assay for plant tissue. The problems inherent in plant tissue samples are that they are of variable quantity (making normalization problematic), and that they are of variable quality (necessitating the co-amplification of a reliable internal control, preferably of larger size than the target). Both of these problems are overcome if the RT-PCR is performed as a relative quantitative RT-PCR with an internal standard in which the internal standard is an amplifiable cDNA fragment that is larger than the target cDNA fragment and in which the abundance of the mRNA encoding the internal standard is roughly 5–100 fold higher than the mRNA encoding the target. This assay measures relative abundance, not absolute abundance of the respective mRNA species.
Other studies may be performed using a more conventional relative quantitative RT-PCR assay with an external standard protocol. These assays sample the PCR products in the linear portion of their amplification curves. The number of PCR cycles that are optimal for sampling must be empirically determined for each target cDNA fragment. In addition, the reverse transcriptase products of each RNA population isolated from the various tissue samples must be carefully normalized for equal concentrations of amplifiable cDNAs. This consideration is very important since the assay measures absolute mRNA abundance. Absolute mRNA abundance can be used as a measure of differential gene expression only in normalized samples. While empirical determination of the linear range of the amplification curve and normalization of cDNA preparations are tedious and time consuming processes, the resulting RT-PCR assays can be superior to those derived from the relative quantitative RT-PCR assay with an internal standard.
One reason for this advantage is that without the internal standard/competitor, all of the reagents can be converted into a single PCR product in the linear range of the amplification curve, thus increasing the sensitivity of the assay. Another reason is that with only one PCR product, display of the product on an electrophoretic gel or another display method becomes less complex, has less background and is easier to interpret.
B. Marker Gene Expression
Marker genes represent an efficient means for assaying the expression of transgenes. Using, for example, a selectable marker gene, one could quantitatively determine the resistance conferred upon a plant or plant cell by a construct comprising the selectable marker coding region operably linked to the promoter to be assayed, e.g., a chloroplast F16BP aldolase promoter. Alternatively, various plant parts could be exposed to a selective agent and the relative resistance provided in these parts quantified, thereby providing an estimate of the tissue specific expression of the promoter.
Screenable markers constitute another efficient means for quantifying the expression of a given transgene. Potentially any screenable marker could be expressed and the marker gene product quantified, thereby providing an estimate of the efficiency with which the promoter directs expression of the transgene. Quantification can readily be carried out using either visual means, or, for example, a photon counting device.
A preferred screenable marker gene assay for use with the current invention constitutes the use of the screenable marker gene β-glucuronidase (Jefferson et al., 1986; uidA gene; the product of which is commonly referred to as GUS). Detection of GUS activity can be performed histochemically using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl glucuronide (X-gluc) as the substrate for the GUS enzyme, yielding a blue precipitate inside of cells containing GUS activity. This assay has been described in detail (Jefferson, 1987). The blue coloration can then be visually scored, and estimates of expression efficiency thereby provided. GUS activity also can be determined by immunoblot analysis or a fluorometric GUS specific activity assay (Jefferson, 1987).
C. Purification and Assays of Proteins
One means for determining the efficiency with which a particular transgene is expressed is to purify and quantify a polypeptide expressed by the transgene. Protein purification techniques are well known to those of skill in the art. These techniques involve, at one level, the crude fractionation of the cellular milieu to polypeptide and non-polypeptide fractions. Having separated the polypeptide from other proteins, the polypeptide of interest may be further purified using chromatographic and electrophoretic techniques to achieve partial or complete purification (or purification to homogeneity). Analytical methods particularly suited to the preparation of a pure peptide are ion-exchange chromatography, exclusion chromatography; polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; and isoelectric focusing. A particularly efficient method of purifying peptides is fast protein liquid chromatography or even HPLC.
Various techniques suitable for use in protein purification will be well known to those of skill in the art. These include, for example, precipitation with ammonium sulphate, PEG, antibodies and the like or by heat denaturation, followed by centrifugation; chromatography steps such as ion exchange, gel filtration, reverse phase, hydroxylapatite and affinity chromatography; isoelectric focusing; gel electrophoresis; and combinations of such and other techniques. As is generally known in the art, it is believed that the order of conducting the various purification steps may be changed, or that certain steps may be omitted, and still result in a suitable method for the preparation of a substantially purified protein or peptide.
There is no general requirement that the protein or peptide being assayed always be provided in their most purified state. Indeed, it is contemplated that less substantially purified products will have utility in certain embodiments. Partial purification may be accomplished by using fewer purification steps in combination, or by utilizing different forms of the same general purification scheme. For example, it is appreciated that a cation-exchange column chromatography performed utilizing an HPLC apparatus will generally result in a greater “-fold” purification than the same technique utilizing a low pressure chromatography system. Methods exhibiting a lower degree of relative purification may have advantages in total recovery of protein product, or in maintaining the activity of an expressed protein.
It is known that the migration of a polypeptide can vary, sometimes significantly, with different conditions of SDS/PAGE (Capaldi et al., 1977). It will therefore be appreciated that under differing electrophoresis conditions, the apparent molecular weights of purified or partially purified expression products may vary.
High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is characterized by a very rapid separation with extraordinary resolution of peaks. This is achieved by the use of very fine particles and high pressure to maintain an adequate flow rate. Separation can be accomplished in a matter of minutes, or at most an hour. Moreover, only a very small volume of the sample is needed because the particles are so small and close-packed that the void volume is a very small fraction of the bed volume. Also, the concentration of the sample need not be very great because the bands are so narrow that there is very little dilution of the sample.
Gel chromatography, or molecular sieve chromatography, is a special type of partition chromatography that is based on molecular size. The theory behind gel chromatography is that the column, which is prepared with tiny particles of an inert substance that contain small pores, separates larger molecules from smaller molecules as they pass through or around the pores, depending on their size. As long as the material of which the particles are made does not adsorb the molecules, the sole factor determining rate of flow is the size. Hence, molecules are eluted from the column in decreasing size, so long as the shape is relatively constant. Gel chromatography is unsurpassed for separating molecules of different size because separation is independent of all other factors such as pH, ionic strength, temperature, etc. There also is virtually no adsorption, less zone spreading and the elution volume is related in a simple matter to molecular weight.
Affinity Chromatography is a chromatographic procedure that relies on the specific affinity between a substance to be isolated and a molecule that it can specifically bind to. This is a receptor-ligand type interaction. The column material is synthesized by covalently coupling one of the binding partners to an insoluble matrix. The column material is then able to specifically adsorb the substance from the solution. Elution occurs by changing the conditions to those in which binding will not occur (alter pH, ionic strength, temperature, etc.).
A particular type of affinity chromatography useful in the purification of carbohydrate containing compounds is lectin affinity chromatography. Lectins are a class of substances that bind to a variety of polysaccharides and glycoproteins. Lectins are usually coupled to agarose by cyanogen bromide. Conconavalin A coupled to Sepharose was the first material of this sort to be used and has been widely used in the isolation of polysaccharides and glycoproteins other lectins that have been include lentil lectin, wheat germ agglutinin which has been useful in the purification of N-acetyl glucosaminyl residues and Helix pomatia lectin. Lectins themselves are purified using affinity chromatography with carbohydrate ligands. Lactose has been used to purify lectins from castor bean and peanuts; maltose has been useful in extracting lectins from lentils and jack bean; N-acetyl-D galactosamine is used for purifying lectins from soybean; N-acetyl glucosaminyl binds to lectins from wheat germ; D-galactosamine has been used in obtaining lectins from clams and L-fucose will bind to lectins from lotus.
The matrix should be a substance that itself does not adsorb molecules to any significant extent and that has a broad range of chemical, physical and thermal stability. The ligand should be coupled in such a way as to not affect its binding properties. The ligand should also provide relatively tight binding. And it should be possible to elute the substance without destroying the sample or the ligand. One of the most common forms of affinity chromatography is immunoaffinity chromatography. The generation of antibodies that would be suitable for use in accord with the present invention is discussed below.
V. Methods for Plant Transformation
Suitable methods for plant transformation for use with the current invention are believed to include virtually any method by which DNA can be introduced into a cell, such as by direct delivery of DNA such as by PEG-mediated transformation of protoplasts (Omirulleh et al., 1993), by desiccation/inhibition-mediated DNA uptake (Potrykus et al., 1985), by electroporation (U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,253, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), by agitation with silicon carbide fibers (Kaeppler et al., 1990; U.S. Pat. No. 5,302,523, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,464,765, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,591,616 and 5,563,055; both specifically incorporated herein by reference) and by acceleration of DNA coated particles (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,318; 5,538,877; and 5,538,880; each specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), etc. Through the application of techniques such as these, maize cells as well as those of virtually any other plant species may be stably transformed, and these cells developed into transgenic plants. In certain embodiments, acceleration methods are preferred and include, for example, microprojectile bombardment and the like.
A. Electroporation
Where one wishes to introduce DNA by means of electroporation, it is contemplated that the method of Krzyzek et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,253, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) will be particularly advantageous. In this method, certain cell wall-degrading enzymes, such as pectin-degrading enzymes, are employed to render the target recipient cells more susceptible to transformation by electroporation than untreated cells. Alternatively, recipient cells are made more susceptible to transformation by mechanical wounding.
To effect transformation by electroporation, one may employ either friable tissues, such as a suspension culture of cells or embryogenic callus or alternatively one may transform immature embryos or other organized tissue directly. In this technique, one would partially degrade the cell walls of the chosen cells by exposing them to pectin-degrading enzymes (pectolyases) or mechanically wounding in a controlled manner. Examples of some species which have been transformed by electroporation of intact cells include maize (U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,253; Rhodes et al., 1995; D'Halluin et al., 1992), wheat (Zhou et al., 1993), tomato (Hou and Lin, 1996), soybean (Christou et al., 1987) and tobacco (Lee et al., 1989).
One also may employ protoplasts for electroporation transformation of plants (Bates, 1994; Lazzeri, 1995). For example, the generation of transgenic soybean plants by electroporation of cotyledon-derived protoplasts is described by Dhir and Widholm in PCT Publication WO 92/17598 (specifically incorporated herein by reference). Other examples of species for which protoplast transformation has been described include barley (Lazerri, 1995), sorghum (Battraw and Hall, 1991), maize (Bhattacharjee et al., 1997), wheat (He et al., 1994) and tomato (Tsukada, 1989).
B. Microprojectile Bombardment
A preferred method for delivering transforming DNA segments to plant cells in accordance with the invention is microprojectile bombardment (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,318; 5,538,880; 5,610,042; and PCT Publication WO 95/06128; each of which is specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). In this method, particles may be coated with nucleic acids and delivered into cells by a propelling force. Exemplary particles include those comprised of tungsten, platinum, and preferably, gold. It is contemplated that in some instances DNA precipitation onto metal particles would not be necessary for DNA delivery to a recipient cell using microprojectile bombardment. However, it is contemplated that particles may contain DNA rather than be coated with DNA. Hence, it is proposed that DNA-coated particles may increase the level of DNA delivery via particle bombardment but are not, in and of themselves, necessary.
For the bombardment, cells in suspension are concentrated on filters or solid culture medium. Alternatively, immature embryos or other target cells may be arranged on solid culture medium. The cells to be bombarded are positioned at an appropriate distance below the macroprojectile stopping plate.
An illustrative embodiment of a method for delivering DNA into plant cells by acceleration is the Biolistics Particle Delivery System (BioRad, Hercules, Calif.), which can be used to propel particles coated with DNA or cells through a screen, such as a stainless steel or Nytex screen, onto a filter surface covered with monocot plant cells cultured in suspension. The screen disperses the particles so that they are not delivered to the recipient cells in large aggregates. It is believed that a screen intervening between the projectile apparatus and the cells to be bombarded reduces the size of projectiles aggregate and may contribute to a higher frequency of transformation by reducing the damage inflicted on the recipient cells by projectiles that are too large.
Microprojectile bombardment techniques are widely applicable, and may be used to transform virtually any plant species. Examples of species for which have been transformed by microprojectile bombardment include monocot species such as maize (PCT Publication WO 95/06128), barley (Ritala et al., 1994; Hensgens et al., 1993), wheat (U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,055, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), rice (Hensgens et al., 1993), oat (Torbet et al., 1995; Torbet et al., 1998), rye (Hensgens et al., 1993), sugarcane (Bower et al., 1992), and sorghum (Casa et al., 1993; Hagio et al., 1991); as well as a number of dicots including tobacco (Tomes et al., 1990; Buising and Benbow, 1994), soybean (U.S. Pat. No. 5,322,783, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), sunflower (Knittel et al. 1994), peanut (Singsit et al., 1997), cotton (McCabe and Martinell, 1993), tomato (Van Eck et al. 1995), and legumes in general (U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,055, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety).
C. Agrobacterium-mediated Transformation
Agrobacterium-mediated transfer is a widely applicable system for introducing genes into plant cells because the DNA can be introduced into whole plant tissues, thereby bypassing the need for regeneration of an intact plant from a protoplast. The use of Agrobacterium-mediated plant integrating vectors to introduce DNA into plant cells is well known in the art. See, for example, the methods described by Fraley et al., (1985), Rogers et al., (1987) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,055, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is most efficient in dicotyledonous plants and is the preferable method for transformation of dicots, including Arabidopsis, tobacco, tomato, and potato. Indeed, while Agrobacterium-mediated transformation has been routinely used with dicotyledonous plants for a number of years, it has only recently become applicable to monocotyledonous plants. Advances in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation techniques have now made the technique applicable to nearly all monocotyledonous plants. For example, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation techniques have now been applied to rice (Hiei et al., 1997; Zhang et al., 1997; U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,616, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), wheat (McCormac et al., 1998), barley (Tingay et al., 1997; McCormac et al., 1998), and maize (Ishida et al., 1996).
Modern Agrobacterium transformation vectors are capable of replication in E. coli as well as Agrobacterium, allowing for convenient manipulations as described (Klee et al., 1985). Moreover, recent technological advances in vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer have improved the arrangement of genes and restriction sites in the vectors to facilitate the construction of vectors capable of expressing various polypeptide coding genes. The vectors described (Rogers et al., 1987) have convenient multi-linker regions flanked by a promoter and a polyadenylation site for direct expression of inserted polypeptide coding genes and are suitable for present purposes. In addition, Agrobacterium containing both armed and disarmed Ti genes can be used for the transformations. In those plant strains where Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is efficient, it is the method of choice because of the facile and defined nature of the gene transfer.
D. Other Transformation Methods
Transformation of plant protoplasts can be achieved using methods based on calcium phosphate precipitation, polyethylene glycol treatment, electroporation, and combinations of these treatments (see, e.g., Potrykus et al., 1985; Lorz et al., 1985; Omirulleh et al., 1993; Fromm et al., 1986; Uchimiya et al., 1986; Callis et al., 1987; Marcotte et al., 1988).
Application of these systems to different plant strains depends upon the ability to regenerate that particular plant strain from protoplasts. Illustrative methods for the regeneration of cereals from protoplasts have been described (Toriyama et al., 1986; Yamada et al., 1986; Abdullah et al., 1986; Omirulleh et al., 1993 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,508,184; each specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). Examples of the use of direct uptake transformation of cereal protoplasts include transformation of rice (Ghosh-Biswas et al., 1994), sorghum (Battraw and Hall, 1991), barley (Lazerri, 1995), oat (Zheng and Edwards, 1990) and maize (Omirulleh et al., 1993).
To transform plant strains that cannot be successfully regenerated from protoplasts, other ways to introduce DNA into intact cells or tissues can be utilized. For example, regeneration of cereals from immature embryos or explants can be effected as described (Vasil, 1989). Also, silicon carbide fiber-mediated transformation may be used with or without protoplasting (Kaeppler, 1990; Kaeppler et al., 1992; U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,055, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). Transformation with this technique is accomplished by agitating silicon carbide fibers together with cells in a DNA solution. DNA passively enters as the cell are punctured. This technique has been used successfully with, for example, the monocot cereals maize (PCT Publication WO 95/06128, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety; Thompson, 1995) and rice (Nagatani, 1997).
VI. Optimization of Microprojectile Bombardment
For microprojectile bombardment transformation in accordance with the current invention, both physical and biological parameters may be optimized. Physical factors are those that involve manipulating the DNA/microprojectile precipitate or those that affect the flight and velocity of either the macro- or microprojectiles. Biological factors include all steps involved in manipulation of cells before and immediately after bombardment, such as the osmotic adjustment of target cells to help alleviate the trauma associated with bombardment, the orientation of an immature embryo or other target tissue relative to the particle trajectory, and also the nature of the transforming DNA, such as linearized DNA or intact supercoiled plasmids. It is believed that pre-bombardment manipulations are especially important for successful transformation of immature embryos.
Accordingly, it is contemplated that one may wish to adjust various of the bombardment parameters in small scale studies to fully optimize the conditions. One may particularly wish to adjust physical parameters such as DNA concentration, gap distance, flight distance, tissue distance, and helium pressure. It further is contemplated that the grade of helium may effect transformation efficiency. For example, differences in transformation efficiencies may be witnessed between bombardments using industrial grade (99.99% pure) or ultra pure helium (99.999% pure), although it is not currently clear which is more advantageous for use in bombardment. One also may optimize the trauma reduction factors (TRFs) by modifying conditions which influence the physiological state of the recipient cells and which may therefore influence transformation and integration efficiencies. For example, the osmotic state, tissue hydration and the subculture stage or cell cycle of the recipient cells may be adjusted for optimum transformation.
A. Physical Parameters

    
    
        1. Gap Distance
    
    


The variable nest (macro holder) can be adjusted to vary the distance between the rupture disk and the macroprojectile, i.e., the gap distance. This distance can be varied from 0 to 2 cm. The predicted effects of a shorter gap are an increase of velocity of both the macro- and microprojectiles, an increased shock wave (which leads to tissue splattering and increased tissue trauma), and deeper penetration of microprojectiles. Longer gap distances would have the opposite effects but may increase viability and therefore the total number of recovered stable transformants.

    
    
        2. Flight Distance
    
    


The fixed nest (contained within the variable nest) can be varied between 0.5 and 2.25 cm in predetermined 0.5 cm increments by the placement of spacer rings to adjust the flight path traversed by the macroprojectile. Short flight paths allow for greater stability of the macroprojectile in flight but reduce the overall velocity of the microprojectiles. Increased stability in flight increases, for example, the number of centered GUS expressing foci. Greater flight distances (up to some point) increase velocity but also increase instability in flight. Based on observations, it is recommended that bombardments typically be done with a flight path length of about 1.0 cm to 1.5 cm.

    
    
        3. Tissue Distance
    
    


Placement of tissue within the gun chamber can have significant effects on microprojectile penetration. Increasing the flight path of the microprojectiles will decrease velocity and trauma associated with the shock wave. A decrease in velocity also will result in shallower penetration of the microprojectiles.

    
    
        4. Helium Pressure
    
    


By manipulation of the type and number of rupture disks, pressure can be varied between 400 and 2000 psi within the gas acceleration tube. Optimum pressure for stable transformation has been determined to be between 1000 and 1200 psi.

    
    
        5. Coating of Microprojectiles
    
    


For microprojectile bombardment, one will attach (i.e., “coat”) DNA to the microprojectiles such that it is delivered to recipient cells in a form suitable for transformation thereof. In this respect, at least some of the transforming DNA must be available to the target cell for transformation to occur, while at the same time during delivery the DNA must be attached to the microprojectile. Therefore, availability of the transforming DNA from the microprojectile may comprise the physical reversal of bonds between transforming DNA and the microprojectile following delivery of the microprojectile to the target cell. This need not be the case, however, as availability to a target cell may occur as a result of breakage of unbound segments of DNA or of other molecules which comprise the physical attachment to the microprojectile. Availability may further occur as a result of breakage of bonds between the transforming DNA and other molecules, which are either directly or indirectly attached to the microprojectile. It further is contemplated that transformation of a target cell may occur by way of direct recombination between the transforming DNA and the genomic DNA of the recipient cell. Therefore, as used herein, a “coated” microprojectile will be one which is capable of being used to transform a target cell, in that the transforming DNA will be delivered to the target cell, yet will be accessible to the target cell such that transformation may occur.
Any technique for coating microprojectiles which allows for delivery of transforming DNA to the target cells may be used. Methods for coating microprojectiles which have been demonstrated to work well with the current invention have been specifically disclosed herein. DNA may be bound to microprojectile particles using alternative techniques, however. For example, particles may be coated with streptavidin and DNA end labeled with long chain thiol cleavable biotinylated nucleotide chains. The DNA adheres to the particles due to the streptavidin-biotin interaction, but is released in the cell by reduction of the thiol linkage through reducing agents present in the cell.
Alternatively, particles may be prepared by functionalizing the surface of a gold oxide particle, providing free amine groups. DNA, having a strong negative charge, binds to the functionalized particles. Furthermore, charged particles may be deposited in controlled arrays on the surface of mylar flyer disks used in the PDS-1000 Biolistics device, thereby facilitating controlled distribution of particles delivered to target tissue.
As disclosed above, it further is proposed, that the concentration of DNA used to coat microprojectiles may influence the recovery of transformants containing a single copy of the transgene. For example, a lower concentration of DNA may not necessarily change the efficiency of the transformation, but may instead increase the proportion of single copy insertion events. In this regard, approximately 1 ng to 2000 ng of transforming DNA may be used per each 1.8 mg of starting microprojectiles. In other embodiments of the invention, approximately 2.5 ng to 1000 ng, 2.5 ng to 750 ng, 2.5 ng to 500 ng, 2.5 ng to 250 ng, 2.5 ng to 100 ng, or 2.5 ng to transforming DNA may be used per each 1.8 mg of starting microprojectiles.
Various other methods also may be used to increase transformation efficiency and/or increase the relative proportion of low-copy transformation events. For example, the inventors contemplate end-modifying transforming DNA with alkaline phosphatase or an agent which will blunt DNA ends prior to transformation. Still further, an inert carrier DNA may be included with the transforming DNA, thereby lowering the effective transforming DNA concentration without lowering the overall amount of DNA used. These techniques are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,153,811, the disclosure of which is specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
B. Biological Parameters
Culturing conditions and other factors can influence the physiological state of the target cells and may have profound effects on transformation and integration efficiencies. First, the act of bombardment could stimulate the production of ethylene which could lead to senescence of the tissue. The addition of antiethylene compounds could increase transformation efficiencies. Second, it is proposed that certain points in the cell cycle may be more appropriate for integration of introduced DNA. Hence synchronization of cell cultures may enhance the frequency of production of transformants. For example, synchronization may be achieved using cold treatment, amino acid starvation, or other cell cycle-arresting agents. Third, the degree of tissue hydration also may contribute to the amount of trauma associated with bombardment as well as the ability of the microprojectiles to penetrate cell walls.
The position and orientation of an embryo or other target tissue relative to the particle trajectory also may be important. For example, the PDS-1000 biolistics device does not produce a uniform spread of particles over the surface of a target petri dish. The velocity of particles in the center of the plate is higher than the particle velocity at further distances from the center of the petri dish. Therefore, it is advantageous to situate target tissue on the petri dish such as to avoid the center of the dish, referred to by some as the “zone of death.” Furthermore, orientation of the target tissue with regard to the trajectory of targets also can be important. It is contemplated that it is desirable to orient the tissue most likely to regenerate a plant toward the particle stream. For example, the scutellum of an immature embryo comprises the cells of greatest embryogenic potential and therefore should be oriented toward the particle stream.
It also has been reported that slightly plasmolyzed yeast cells allow increased transformation efficiencies (Armaleo et al., 1990). It was hypothesized that the altered osmotic state of the cells helped to reduce trauma associated with the penetration of the microprojectile. Additionally, the growth and cell cycle stage may be important with respect to transformation.

    
    
        1. Osmotic Adjustment
    
    


It has been suggested that osmotic pre-treatment could potentially reduce bombardment associated injury as a result of the decreased turgor pressure of the plasmolyzed cell. In a previous study, the number of cells transiently expressing uidA increased following subculture into both fresh medium and osmotically adjusted medium (PCT Publication WO 95/06128, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). Pretreatment times of 90 minutes showed higher numbers of uicA expressing foci than shorter times. Cells incubated in 500 mOSM/kg medium for 90 minutes showed an approximately 3.5 fold increase in transient GUS foci than the control. Preferably, immature embryos are precultured for 4–5 hours prior to bombardment on culture medium containing 12% sucrose. A second culture on 12% sucrose is performed for 16–24 hours following bombardment. Alternatively, type II cells are pretreated on 0.2M mannitol for 3–4 hours prior to bombardment. It is contemplated that pretreatment of cells with other osmotically active solutes for a period of 1–6 hours also may be desirable.

    
    
        2. Plasmid Configuration
    
    


In some instances, it will be desirable to deliver DNA to maize cells that does not contain DNA sequences necessary for maintenance of the plasmid vector in the bacterial host, e.g., E. coli, such as antibiotic resistance genes, including but not limited to ampicillin, kanamycin, and tetracycline resistance, and prokaryotic origins of DNA replication. In such case, a DNA fragment containing the transforming DNA may be purified prior to transformation. An exemplary method of purification is gel electrophoresis on a 1.2% low melting temperature agarose gel, followed by recovery from the agarose gel by melting gel slices in a 6–10 fold excess of Tris-EDTA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 70° C.–72° C.); frozen and thawed (37° C.); and the agarose pelleted by centrifugation. A Qiagen Q-100 column then may be used for purification of DNA. For efficient recovery of DNA, the flow rate of the column may be adjusted to 40 ml/hr.
Isolated DNA fragments can be recovered from agarose gels using a variety of electroelution techniques, enzyme digestion of the agarose, or binding of DNA to glass beads (e.g., Gene Clean). In addition, HPLC and/or use of magnetic particles may be used to isolate DNA fragments. As an alternative to isolation of DNA fragments, a plasmid vector can be digested with a restriction enzyme and this DNA delivered to maize cells without prior purification of the expression cassette fragment.
VII. Recipient Cells for Transformation
Tissue culture requires media and controlled environments. “Media” refers to the numerous nutrient mixtures that are used to grow cells in vitro, that is, outside of the intact living organism. The medium usually is a suspension of various categories of ingredients (salts, amino acids, growth regulators, sugars, buffers) that are required for growth of most cell types. However, each specific cell type requires a specific range of ingredient proportions for growth, and an even more specific range of formulas for optimum growth. Rate of cell growth also will vary among cultures initiated with the array of media that permit growth of that cell type.
Nutrient media is prepared as a liquid, but this may be solidified by adding the liquid to materials capable of providing a solid support. Agar is most commonly used for this purpose. Bactoagar, Hazelton agar, Gelrite, and Gelgro are specific types of solid support that are suitable for growth of plant cells in tissue culture.
Some cell types will grow and divide either in liquid suspension or on solid media. As disclosed herein, plant cells will grow in suspension or on solid medium, but regeneration of plants from suspension cultures typically requires transfer from liquid to solid media at some point in development. The type and extent of differentiation of cells in culture will be affected not only by the type of media used and by the environment, for example, pH, but also by whether media is solid or liquid. Table 7 illustrates the composition of various media useful for creation of recipient cells and for plant regeneration.
Recipient cell targets include, but are not limited to, meristem cells, Type I, Type II, and Type III callus, immature embryos and gametic cells such as microspores, pollen, sperm and egg cells. It is contemplated that any cell from which a fertile plant may be regenerated is useful as a recipient cell. Type I, Type II, and Type III callus may be initiated from tissue sources including, but not limited to, immature embryos, seedling apical meristems, microspores and the like. Those cells which are capable of proliferating as callus also are recipient cells for genetic transformation. The present invention provides techniques for transforming immature embryos and subsequent regeneration of fertile transgenic plants. Transformation of immature embryos obviates the need for long term development of recipient cell cultures. Pollen, as well as its precursor cells, microspores, may be capable of functioning as recipient cells for genetic transformation, or as vectors to carry foreign DNA for incorporation during fertilization. Direct pollen transformation would obviate the need for cell culture. Meristematic cells (i.e., plant cells capable of continual cell division and characterized by an undifferentiated cytological appearance, normally found at growing points or tissues in plants such as root tips, stem apices, lateral buds, etc.) may represent another type of recipient plant cell. Because of their undifferentiated growth and capacity for organ differentiation and totipotency, a single transformed meristematic cell could be recovered as a whole transformed plant. In fact, it is proposed that embryogenic suspension cultures may be an in vitro meristematic cell system, retaining an ability for continued cell division in an undifferentiated state, controlled by the media environment.
Cultured plant cells that can serve as recipient cells for transforming with desired DNA segments may be any plant cells including corn cells, and more specifically, cells from Zea mays L. Somatic cells are of various types. Embryogenic cells are one example of somatic cells which may be induced to regenerate a plant through embryo formation. Non-embryogenic cells are those which typically will not respond in such a fashion. An example of non-embryogenic cells are certain Black Mexican Sweet (BMS) corn cells.
The development of embryogenic maize calli and suspension cultures useful in the context of the present invention, e.g., as recipient cells for transformation, has been described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,134,074; and 5,489,520; each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Certain techniques may be used that enrich recipient cells within a cell population. For example, Type II callus development, followed by manual selection and culture of friable, embryogenic tissue, generally results in an enrichment of recipient cells for use in, microprojectile transformation. Suspension culturing, particularly using the media disclosed herein, may improve the ratio of recipient to non-recipient cells in any given population. Manual selection techniques which can be employed to select recipient cells may include, e.g., assessing cell morphology and differentiation, or may use various physical or biological means. Cryopreservation also is a possible method of selecting for recipient cells.
Manual selection of recipient cells, e.g., by selecting embryogenic cells from the surface of a Type II callus, is one means that may be used in an attempt to enrich for recipient cells prior to culturing (whether cultured on solid media or in suspension). The preferred cells may be those located at the surface of a cell cluster, and may further be identifiable by their lack of differentiation, their size and dense cytoplasm. The preferred cells will generally be those cells which are less differentiated, or not yet committed to differentiation. Thus, one may wish to identify and select those cells which are cytoplasmically dense, relatively unvacuolated with a high nucleus to cytoplasm ratio (e.g., determined by cytological observations), small in size (e.g., 10–20 μm), and capable of sustained divisions and somatic proembryo formation.
It is proposed that other means for identifying such cells also may be employed. For example, through the use of dyes, such as Evan's blue, which are excluded by cells with relatively non-permeable membranes, such as embryogenic cells, and taken up by relatively differentiated cells such as root-like cells and snake cells (so-called due to their snake-like appearance).
Other possible means of identifying recipient cells include the use of isozyme markers of embryogenic cells, such as glutamate dehydrogenase, which can be detected by cytochemical stains (Fransz et al., 1989). However, it is cautioned that the use of isozyme markers including glutamate dehydrogenase may lead to some degree of false positives from non-embryogenic cells such as rooty cells which nonetheless have a relatively high metabolic activity.
A. Culturing Cells to be Recipients for Transformation
The ability to prepare and cryopreserve cultures of plant cells is important to certain aspects of the present invention, in that it provides a means for reproducibly and successfully preparing cells for transformation. A variety of different types of media have been previously developed and may be employed in carrying out various aspects of the invention. The following table, Table 7, sets forth the composition of the media preferred by the inventor for carrying out these aspects of the invention.







TABLE 7







Tissue Culture Media Which are Used for Type II Callus


Development, Development of Suspension Cultures and Regeneration


of Plant Cells (Particularly Maize Cells)















OTHER


MEDIA
BASAL
SU-

COMPONENTS**


NO.
MEDIUM
CROSE
pH
(Amount/L)





 7
MS*
2%
6.0
.25 mg thiamine






.5 mg BAP






.5 mg NAA






Bactoagar


 10
MS
2%
6.0
.25 mg thiamine






1 mg BAP






1 mg 2,4-D






400 mg L-proline






Bactoagar


 19
MS
2%
6.0
.25 mg thiamine






.25 mg BAP






.25 mg NAA






Bactoagar


 20
MS
3%
6.0
.25 mg thiamine






1 mg BAP






1 mg NAA






Bactoagar


 52
MS
2%
6.0
.25 mg thiamine






1 mg 2,4-D






10−7M ABA






BACTOAGAR


101
MS
3%
6.0
MS vitamins






100 mg myo-inositol






Bactoagar


105
MS
—
3.5
0.04 mg NAA






3 mg BAP






1 mg thiamine.HCl






0.5 mg niacin






0.91 mg L-asparagine






monohydrate






100 mg myo-inositol






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






1.4 g L-proline






20 g sorbitol






2.0 g Gelgro


110
MS
6%
5.8
1 mg thiamine.HCl






1 mg niacin






3.6 g Gelgro


142
MS
6%
6.0
MS vitamins






5 mg BAP






0.186 mg NAA






0.175 mg IAA






0.403 mg 2IP






Bactoagar


157
MS
6%
6.0
MS vitamins






100 mg myo-inositol






Bactoagar


163
MS
3%
6.0
MS vitamins






3.3 mg dicamba






100 mg myo-inositol






Bactoagar


171
MS
3%
6.0
MS vitamins






.25 mg 2,4-D






10 mg BAP






100 mg myo-inositol






Bactoagar


173
MS
6%
6.0
MS vitamins






5 mg BAP






.186 mg NAA






.175 mg IAA






.403 mg 2IP






10−7M ABA






200 mg myo-inositol






Bactoagar


177
MS
3%
6.0
MS vitamins






.25 mg 2,4-D






10 mg BAP






10−7M ABA






100 mg myo-inositol






Bactoagar


185
MS
—
5.8
3 mg BAP






.04 mg NAA






RT vitamins






1.65 mg thiamine






1.38 g L-proline






20 g sorbitol






Bactoagar


189
MS
—
5.8
3 mg BAP






.04 mg NAA






.5 mg niacin






800 mg L-asparagine






100 mg casamino acids






20 g sorbitol






1.4 g L-proline






100 mg myo-inositol






Gelgro


201
N6
2%
5.8
N6 vitamins






2 mg L-glycine






1 mg 2,4-D






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






2.9 g L-proline






Gelgro


205
N6
2%
5.8
N6 vitamins






2 mg L-glycine






.5 mg 2,4-D






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






2.9 g L-proline






Gelgro


209
N6
6%
5.8
N6 vitamins






2 mg L-glycine






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






0.69 g L-proline






Bactoagar


210
N6
3%
5.5
N6 vitamins






2 mg 2,4-D






250 mg Ca






pantothenate






100 mg myo-inositol






790 mg L-asparagine






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






1.4 g L-proline






Hazelton agar****






2 mg L-glycine


211
N6
2%
5.8
1 mg 2,4-D






0.5 mg niacin






1.0 mg thiamine






0.91 g L-asparagine






100 mg myo-inositol






0.5 g MES






100 mg/L casein






hydrolysate






1.6 g MgCl2-6H20






0.69 g L-proline






2 g Gelgro


212
N6
3%
5.5
N6 vitamins






2 mg L-glycine






2 mg 2,4-D






250 mg Ca






pantothenate






100 mg myo-inositol






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






1.4 g L-proline






Hazelton agar****


227
N6
2%
5.8
N6 vitamins






2 mg L-glycine






13.2 mg dicamba






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






2.9 g L-proline






Gelgro


273 (also,
N6
2%
5.8
N6 vitamins


201V, 236S,



2 mg L-glycine


201D, 2071,



1 mg 2,4-D


2366, 201SV,



16.9 mg AgNO3


2377, and



100 mg casein


201BV)



hydrolysate






2.9 g L-proline


279
N6
2%
5.8
3.3 mg dicamba






1 mg thiamine






.5 mg niacin






800 mg L-asparagine






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






100 mg myoinositol






1.4 g L-proline






Gelgro****


288
N6
3%

3.3 mg dicamba






1 mg thiamine






.5 mg niacin






.8 g L-asparagine






100 mg myo-inosital






1.4 g L-proline






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






16.9 mg AgNO3






Gelgro


401
MS
3%
6.0
3.73 mg Na2EDTA






.25 mg thiamine






1 mg 2,4-D






2 mg NAA






200 mg casein






hydrolysate






500 mg K2SO4






400 mg KH2PO4






100 mg myo-inositol


402
MS
3%
6.0
3.73 mg Na2EDTA






.25 mg thiamine






1 mg 2,4-D






200 mg casein






hydrolysate






2.9 g L-proline






500 mg K2SO4






400 mg KH2PO4






100 mg myo-inositol


409
MS
3%
6.0
3.73 mg Na2EDTA






.25 mg thiamine






9.9 mg dicamba






200 mg casein






hydrolysate






2.9 g L-proline






500 mg K2SO4






400 mg KH2PO4






100 mg myo-inositol


501
Clark's
2%
5.7



Medium***


607
1⁄2 × MS
3%
5.8
1 mg thiamine






1 mg niacin






Gelrite


615
MS
3%
6.0
MS vitamins






6 mg BAP






100 mg myo-inositol






Bactoagar


617
1⁄2 × MS
1.5%
6.0
MS vitamins






50 mg myo-inositol






Bactoagar


708
N6
2%
5.8
N6 vitamins






2 mg L-glycine






1.5 mg 2,4-D






200 mg casein






hydrolysate






0.69 g L-proline






Gelrite


721
N6
2%
5.8
3.3 mg dicamba






1 mg thiamine






.5 mg niacin






800 mg L-asparagine






100 mg myo-inositol






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






1.4 g L-proline






54.65 g mannitol






Gelgro


726
N6
3%
5.8
3.3 mg dicamba






.5 mg niacin






1 mg thiamine






800 mg L-asparagine






100 mg myo-inositol






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






1.4 g L-proline


727
N6
3%
5.8
N6 vitamins






2 mg L-glycine






9.9 mg dicamba






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






2.9 g L-proline






Gelgro


728
N6
3%
5.8
N6 vitamins






2 mg L-glycine






9.9 mg dicamba






16.9 mg AgNO3






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






2.9 g L-proline






Gelgro


734
N6
2%
5.8
N6 vitamins






2 mg L-glycine






1.5 mg 2,4-D






14 g Fe sequestreene






(replaces Fe-EDTA)






200 mg casein






hydrolyste






0.69 g L-proline






Gelrite


735
N6
2%
5.8
1 mg 2,4-D






.5 mg niacin






.91 g L-asparagine






100 mg myo-inositol






1 mg thiamine






.5 g MES






.75 g MgCl2






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






0.69 g L-proline






Gelgro


2004 
N6
3%
5.8
1 mg thiamine






0.5 mg niacin






3.3 mg dicamba






17 mg AgNO3






1.4 g L-proline






0.8 g L-asparagine






100 mg casein






hydrolysate






100 mg myo-inositol






Gelrite


2008 
N6
3%
5.8
1 mg thiamine






0.5 mg niacin






3.3 mg dicamba






1.4 g L-proline






0.8 g L-asparagine






Gelrite





*Basic MS medium described in Murashige and Skoog (1962). This medium is typically modified by decreasing the NH4NO3 from 1.64 g/l to 1.55 g/l, and omitting the pyridoxine HCl, nicotinic acid, myo-inositol and glycine.


**NAA = Napthol Acetic Acid IAA = Indole Acetic Acid 2-IP = 2, isopentyl adenine 2,4-D = 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid BAP = 6-Benzyl aminopurine ABA = abscisic acid


***Basic medium described in Clark (1982)


****These media may be made with or without solidifying agent.






A number of exemplary maize cultures which may be used for transformation have been developed and are disclosed in PCT publication WO 95/06128, the disclosure of which is specifically incorporated herein by reference.
B. Media
In certain embodiments of the current invention, recipient cells may be selected following growth in culture. Where employed, cultured cells may be grown either on solid supports or in the form of liquid suspensions. In either instance, nutrients may be provided to the cells in the form of media, and environmental conditions controlled. There are many types of tissue culture media comprised of various amino acids, salts, sugars, growth regulators and vitamins. Most of the media employed in the practice of the invention will have some similar components (see Table 7), but may differ in the composition and proportions of their ingredients depending on the particular application envisioned. For example, various cell types usually grow in more than one type of media, but will exhibit different growth rates and different morphologies, depending on the growth media. In some media, cells survive but do not divide.
Various types of media suitable for culture of plant cells previously have been described. Examples of these media include, but are not limited to, the N6 medium described by Chu et al. (1975) and MS media (Murashige and Skoog, 1962). It has been discovered that media such as MS which have a high ammonia/nitrate ratio are counterproductive to the generation of recipient cells in that they promote loss of morphogenic capacity. N6 media, on the other hand, has a somewhat lower ammonia/nitrate ratio, and is contemplated to promote the generation of recipient cells by maintaining cells in a proembryonic state capable of sustained divisions.
C. Maintenance
The method of maintenance of cell cultures may contribute to their utility as sources of recipient cells for transformation. Manual selection of cells for transfer to fresh culture medium, frequency of transfer to fresh culture medium, composition of culture medium, and environmental factors including, but not limited to, light quality and quantity and temperature are all important factors in maintaining callus and/or suspension cultures that are useful as sources of recipient cells. It is contemplated that alternating callus between different culture conditions may be beneficial in enriching for recipient cells within a culture. For example, it is proposed that cells may be cultured in suspension culture, but transferred to solid medium at regular intervals. After a period of growth on solid medium cells can be manually selected for return to liquid culture medium. It is proposed that by repeating this sequence of transfers to fresh culture medium it is possible to enrich for recipient cells. It also is contemplated that passing cell cultures through a 1.9 mm sieve is useful in maintaining the friability of a callus or suspension culture and may be beneficial in enriching for transformable cells.
D. Cryopreservation Methods
Cryopreservation is important because it allows one to maintain and preserve a known transformable cell culture for future use, while eliminating the cumulative detrimental effects associated with extended culture periods.
Cell suspensions and callus were cryopreserved using modifications of methods previously reported (Finkle, 1985; Withers & King, 1979). The cryopreservation protocol comprised adding a pre-cooled (0° C.) concentrated cryoprotectant mixture stepwise over a period of one to two hours to pre-cooled (0° C.) cells. The mixture was maintained at 0° C. throughout this period. The volume of added cryoprotectant was equal to the initial volume of the cell suspension (1:1 addition), and the final concentration of cryoprotectant additives was 10% dimethyl sulfoxide, 10% polyethylene glycol (6000 MW), 0.23 M proline and 0.23 M glucose. The mixture was allowed to equilibrate at 0° C. for 30 minutes, during which time the cell suspension/cryoprotectant mixture was divided into 1.5 ml aliquot (0.5 ml packed cell volume) in 2 ml polyethylene cryo-vials. The tubes were cooled at 0.5° C./minute to −8° C. and held at this temperature for ice nucleation.
Once extracellular ice formation had been visually confirmed, the tubes were cooled at 0.5° C./minute from −8° C. to −35° C. They were held at this temperature for 45 minutes (to insure uniform freeze-induced dehydration throughout the cell clusters). At this point, the cells had lost the majority of their osmotic volume (i.e., there is little free water left in the cells), and they could be safely plunged into liquid nitrogen for storage. The paucity of free water remaining in the cells in conjunction with the rapid cooling rates from −35° C. to −196° C. prevented large organized ice crystals from forming in the cells. The cells are stored in liquid nitrogen, which effectively immobilizes the cells and slows metabolic processes to the point where long-term storage should not be detrimental.
Thawing of the extracellular solution was accomplished by removing the cryo-tube from liquid nitrogen and swirling it in sterile 42° C. water for approximately 2 minutes. The tube was removed from the heat immediately after the last ice crystals had melted to prevent heating the tissue. The cell suspension (still in the cryoprotectant mixture) was pipetted onto a filter, resting on a layer of BMS cells (the feeder layer which provided a nurse effect during recovery). The cryoprotectant solution is removed by pipetting. Culture medium comprised a callus proliferation medium with increased osmotic strength. Dilution of the cryoprotectant occurred slowly as the solutes diffused away through the filter and nutrients diffused upward to the recovering cells. Once subsequent growth of the thawed cells was noted, the growing tissue was transferred to fresh culture medium. If initiation of a suspension culture was desired, the cell clusters were transferred back into liquid suspension medium as soon as sufficient cell mass had been regained (usually within 1 to 2 weeks). Alternatively, cells were cultured on solid callus proliferation medium. After the culture was reestablished in liquid (within 1 to 2 additional weeks), it was used for transformation experiments. When desired, previously cryopreserved cultures may be frozen again for storage.
VIII. Production and Characterization of Stably Transformed Plants
After effecting delivery of exogenous DNA to recipient cells, the next steps generally concern identifying the transformed cells for further culturing and plant regeneration. As mentioned herein, in order to improve the ability to identify transformants, one may desire to employ a selectable or screenable marker gene as, or in addition to, the expressible gene of interest. In this case, one would then generally assay the potentially transformed cell population by exposing the cells to a selective agent or agents, or one would screen the cells for the desired marker gene trait.
A. Selection
It is believed that DNA is introduced into only a small percentage of target cells in any one experiment. In order to provide an efficient system for identification of those cells receiving DNA and integrating it into their genomes one may employ a means for selecting those cells that are stably transformed. One exemplary embodiment of such a method is to introduce into the host cell, a marker gene which confers resistance to some normally inhibitory agent, such as an antibiotic or herbicide. Examples of antibiotics which may be used include the aminoglycoside antibiotics neomycin, kanamycin and paromomycin, or the antibiotic hygromycin. Resistance to the aminoglycoside antibiotics is conferred by aminoglycoside phosphostransferase enzymes such as neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPT II) or NPT I, whereas resistance to hygromycin is conferred by hygromycin phosphotransferase.
Potentially transformed cells then are exposed to the selective agent. In the population of surviving cells will be those cells where, generally, the resistance-conferring gene has been integrated and expressed at sufficient levels to permit cell survival. Cells may be tested further to confirm stable integration of the exogenous DNA. Using the techniques disclosed herein, greater than 40% of bombarded embryos may yield transformants.
One herbicide which constitutes a desirable selection agent is the broad spectrum herbicide bialaphos. Bialaphos is a tripeptide antibiotic produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus and is composed of phosphinothricin (PPT), an analogue of L-glutamic acid, and two L-alanine residues. Upon removal of the L-alanine residues by intracellular peptidases, the PPT is released and is a potent inhibitor of glutamine synthetase (GS), a pivotal enzyme involved in ammonia assimilation and nitrogen metabolism (Ogawa et al., 1973). Synthetic PPT, the active ingredient in the herbicide LibertyTM also is effective as a selection agent. Inhibition of GS in plants by PPT causes the rapid accumulation of ammonia and death of the plant cells.
The organism producing bialaphos and other species of the genus Streptomyces also synthesizes an enzyme phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT) which is encoded by the bar gene in Streptomyces hygroscopicus and the pat gene in Streptomyces viridochromogenes. The use of the herbicide resistance gene encoding phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT) is referred to in DE 3642 829 A, wherein the gene is isolated from Streptomyces viridochromogenes. In the bacterial source organism, this enzyme acetylates the free amino group of PPT preventing auto-toxicity (Thompson et al., 1987). The bar gene has been cloned (Murakami et al., 1986; Thompson et al., 1987) and expressed in transgenic tobacco, tomato, potato (De Block et al., 1987) Brassica (De Block et al., 1989) and maize (U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,318). In previous reports, some transgenic plants which expressed the resistance gene were completely resistant to commercial formulations of PPT and bialaphos in greenhouses.
Another example of a herbicide which is useful for selection of transformed cell lines in the practice of the invention is the broad spectrum herbicide glyphosate. Glyphosate inhibits the action of the enzyme EPSPS, which is active in the aromatic amino acid biosynthetic pathway. Inhibition of this enzyme leads to starvation for the amino acids phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan and secondary metabolites derived thereof. U.S. Pat. No. 4,535,060 describes the isolation of EPSPS mutations which confer glyphosate resistance on the Salmonella typhimurium gene for EPSPS, aroA. The EPSPS gene was cloned from Zea mays and mutations similar to those found in a glyphosate resistant aroA gene were introduced in vitro. Mutant genes encoding glyphosate resistant EPSPS enzymes are described in, for example, PCT Publication WO 97/04103. The best characterized mutant EPSPS gene conferring glyphosate resistance comprises amino acid changes at residues 102 and 106, although it is anticipated that other mutations will also be useful (PCT Publication WO 97/04103). Furthermore, a naturally occurring glyphosate resistant EPSPS may be used, e.g., the CP4 gene isolated from Agrobacterium encodes a glyphosate resistant EPSPS (U.S. Pat. No. 5,627,061).
To use the bar-bialaphos or the EPSPS-glyphosate selective system, bombarded tissue is cultured for 0–28 days on nonselective medium and subsequently transferred to medium containing from 1–3 mg/l bialaphos or 1–3 mM glyphosate as appropriate. While ranges of 1–3 mg/l bialaphos or 1–3 mM glyphosate will typically be preferred, it is proposed that ranges of 0.1–50 mg/l bialaphos or 0.1–50 mM glyphosate will find utility in the practice of the invention. Tissue can be placed on any porous, inert, solid or semi-solid support for bombardment, including but not limited to filters and solid culture medium. Bialaphos and glyphosate are provided as examples of agents suitable for selection of transformants, but the technique of this invention is not limited to them.
It further is contemplated that the herbicide dalapon, 2,2-dichloropropionic acid, may be useful for identification of transformed cells. The enzyme 2,2-dichloropropionic acid dehalogenase (deh) inactivates the herbicidal activity of 2,2-dichloropropionic acid and therefore confers herbicidal resistance on cells or plants expressing a gene encoding the dehalogenase enzyme (Buchanan-Wollaston et al., 1992; U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,708).
Alternatively, a gene encoding anthranilate synthase, which confers resistance to certain amino acid analogs, e.g., 5-methyltryptophan or 6-methyl anthranilate, may be useful as a selectable marker gene. The use of an anthranilate synthase gene as a selectable marker was described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,508,468 and PCT Publication WO 97/26366.
An example of a screenable marker trait is the red pigment produced under the control of the R-locus in maize. This pigment may be detected by culturing cells on a solid support containing nutrient media capable of supporting growth at this stage and selecting cells from colonies (visible aggregates of cells) that are pigmented. These cells may be cultured further, either in suspension or on solid media. The R-locus is useful for selection of transformants from bombarded immature embryos. In a similar fashion, the introduction of the C1 and B genes will result in pigmented cells and/or tissues.
The enzyme luciferase may be used as a screenable marker in the context of the present invention. In the presence of the substrate luciferin, cells expressing luciferase emit light which can be detected on photographic or x-ray film, in a luminometer (or liquid scintillation counter), by devices that enhance night vision, or by a highly light sensitive video camera, such as a photon counting camera. All of these assays are nondestructive and transformed cells may be cultured further following identification. The photon counting camera is especially valuable as it allows one to identify specific cells or groups of cells which are expressing luciferase and manipulate those in real time. Another screenable marker which may be used in a similar fashion is the gene coding for green fluorescent protein.
It further is contemplated that combinations of screenable and selectable markers will be useful for identification of transformed cells. In some cell or tissue types a selection agent, such as bialaphos or glyphosate, may either not provide enough killing activity to clearly recognize transformed cells or may cause substantial nonselective inhibition of transformants and nontransformants alike, thus causing the selection technique to not be effective. It is proposed that selection with a growth inhibiting compound, such as bialaphos or glyphosate at concentrations below those that cause 100% inhibition followed by screening of growing tissue for expression of a screenable marker gene such as luciferase would allow one to recover transformants from cell or tissue types that are not amenable to selection alone. It is proposed that combinations of selection and screening may enable one to identify transformants in a wider variety of cell and tissue types. This may be efficiently achieved using a gene fusion between a selectable marker gene and a screenable marker gene, for example, between an NPTII gene and a GFP gene.
B. Regeneration and Seed Production
Cells that survive the exposure to the selective agent, or cells that have been scored positive in a screening assay, may be cultured in media that supports regeneration of plants. In an exemplary embodiment, MS and N6 media may be modified (see Table 7) by including further substances such as growth regulators. A preferred growth regulator for such purposes is dicamba or 2,4-D. However, other growth regulators may be employed, including NAA, NAA+2,4-D or perhaps even picloram. Media improvement in these and like ways has been found to facilitate the growth of cells at specific developmental stages. Tissue may be maintained on a basic media with growth regulators until sufficient tissue is available to begin plant regeneration efforts, or following repeated rounds of manual selection, until the morphology of the tissue is suitable for regeneration, at least 2 wk, then transferred to media conducive to maturation of embryoids. Cultures are transferred every 2 wk on this medium. Shoot development will signal the time to transfer to medium lacking growth regulators.
The transformed cells, identified by selection or screening and cultured in an appropriate medium that supports regeneration, will then be allowed to mature into plants. Developing plantlets are transferred to soiless plant growth mix, and hardened off, e.g., in an environmentally controlled chamber at about 85% relative humidity, 600 ppm CO2, and 25–250 microeinsteins m−2 s−1 of light, prior to transfer to a greenhouse or growth chamber for maturation. Plants are preferably matured either in a growth chamber or greenhouse. Plants are regenerated from about 6 wk to 10 months after a transformant is identified, depending on the initial tissue. During regeneration, cells are grown on solid media in tissue culture vessels. Illustrative embodiments of such vessels are petri dishes and Plant Cons. Regenerating plants are preferably grown at about 19 to 28° C. After the regenerating plants have reached the stage of shoot and root development, they may be transferred to a greenhouse for further growth and testing.
Note, however, that seeds on transformed plants may occasionally require embryo rescue due to cessation of seed development and premature senescence of plants. To rescue developing embryos, they are excised from surface-disinfected seeds 10–20 days post-pollination and cultured. An embodiment of media used for culture at this stage comprises MS salts, 2% sucrose, and 5.5 g/l agarose. In embryo rescue, large embryos (defined as greater than 3 mm in length) are germinated directly on an appropriate media. Embryos smaller than that may be cultured for 1 wk on media containing the above ingredients along with 10−5M abscisic acid and then transferred to growth regulator-free medium for germination.
Progeny may be recovered from transformed plants and tested for expression of the exogenous expressible gene by localized application of an appropriate substrate to plant parts such as leaves. In the case of bar transformed plants, it was found that transformed parental plants (RO) and their progeny of any generation tested exhibited no bialaphos-related necrosis after localized application of the herbicide Basta to leaves, if there was functional PAT activity in the plants as assessed by an in vitro enzymatic assay. All PAT positive progeny tested contained bar, confirming that the presence of the enzyme and the resistance to bialaphos were associated with the transmission through the germline of the marker gene.
C. Characterization
To confirm the presence of the exogenous DNA or “transgene(s)” in the regenerating plants, a variety of assays may be performed. Such assays include, for example, “molecular biological” assays, such as Southern and Northern blotting and PCR; “biochemical” assays, such as detecting the presence of a protein product, e.g., by immunological means (ELISAs and Western blots) or by enzymatic function; plant part assays, such as leaf or root assays; and also, by analyzing the phenotype of the whole regenerated plant.

    
    
        1. DNA Integration, RNA Expression and Inheritance
    
    


Genomic DNA may be isolated from callus cell lines or any plant parts to determine the presence of the exogenous gene through the use of techniques well known to those skilled in the art. Note, that intact sequences will not always be present, presumably due to rearrangement or deletion of sequences in the cell.
The presence of DNA elements introduced through the methods of this invention may be determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Using this technique discreet fragments of DNA are amplified and detected by gel electrophoresis. This type of analysis permits one to determine whether a gene is present in a stable transformant, but does not prove integration of the introduced gene into the host cell genome. Typically, DNA has been integrated into the genome of all transformants that demonstrate the presence of the gene through PCR analysis. In addition, it is not possible using PCR techniques to determine whether transformants have exogenous genes introduced into different sites in the genome, i.e., whether transformants are of independent origin. It is contemplated that using PCR techniques it would be possible to clone fragments of the host genomic DNA adjacent to an introduced gene.
Positive proof of DNA integration into the host genome and the independent identities of transformants may be determined using the technique of Southern hybridization. Using this technique specific DNA sequences that were introduced into the host genome and flanking host DNA sequences can be identified. Hence the Southern hybridization pattern of a given transformant serves as an identifying characteristic of that transformant. In addition it is possible through Southern hybridization to demonstrate the presence of introduced genes in high molecular weight DNA, i.e., confirm that the introduced gene has been integrated into the host cell genome. The technique of Southern hybridization provides information that is obtained using PCR, e.g., the presence of a gene, but also demonstrates integration into the genome and characterizes each individual transformant.
It is contemplated that using the techniques of dot or slot blot hybridization which are modifications of Southern hybridization techniques one could obtain the same information that is derived from PCR, e.g., the presence of a gene.
Both PCR and Southern hybridization techniques can be used to demonstrate transmission of a transgene to progeny. In most instances the characteristic Southern hybridization pattern for a given transformant will segregate in progeny as one or more Mendelian genes (Spencer et al., 1992) indicating stable inheritance of the transgene.
Whereas DNA analysis techniques may be conducted using DNA isolated from any part of a plant, RNA will only be expressed in particular cells or tissue types and hence it will be necessary to prepare RNA for analysis from these tissues. PCRTM techniques also may be used for detection and quantitation of RNA produced from introduced genes. In this application of PCR it is first necessary to reverse transcribe RNA into DNA, using enzymes such as reverse transcriptase, and then through the use of conventional PCR techniques amplify the DNA. In most instances PCRTM techniques, while useful, will not demonstrate integrity of the RNA product. Further information about the nature of the RNA product may be obtained by Northern blotting. This technique will demonstrate the presence of an RNA species and give information about the integrity of that RNA. The presence or absence of an RNA species also can be determined using dot or slot blot Northern hybridizations. These techniques are modifications of Northern blotting and will only demonstrate the presence or absence of an RNA species.

    
    
        2. Gene Expression
    
    


While Southern blotting and PCR may be used to detect the gene(s) in question, they do not provide information as to whether the gene is being expressed. Expression may be evaluated by specifically identifying the protein products of the introduced genes or evaluating the phenotypic changes brought about by their expression.
Assays for the production and identification of specific proteins may make use of physical-chemical, structural, functional, or other properties of the proteins. Unique physical-chemical or structural properties allow the proteins to be separated and identified by electrophoretic procedures, such as native or denaturing gel electrophoresis or isoelectric focusing, or by chromatographic techniques such as ion exchange or gel exclusion chromatography. The unique structures of individual proteins offer opportunities for use of specific antibodies to detect their presence in formats such as an ELISA assay. Combinations of approaches may be employed with even greater specificity such as western blotting in which antibodies are used to locate individual gene products that have been separated by electrophoretic techniques. Additional techniques may be employed to absolutely confirm the identity of the product of interest such as evaluation by amino acid sequencing following purification. Although these are among the most commonly employed, other procedures may be additionally used.
Assay procedures also may be used to identify the expression of proteins by their functionality, especially the ability of enzymes to catalyze specific chemical reactions involving specific substrates and products. These reactions may be followed by providing and quantifying the loss of substrates or the generation of products of the reactions by physical or chemical procedures. Examples are as varied as the enzyme to be analyzed and may include assays for PAT enzymatic activity by following production of radiolabeled acetylated phosphinothricin from phosphinothricin and 14C-acetyl CoA or for anthranilate synthase activity by following an increase in fluorescence as anthranilate is produced, to name two.
Very frequently the expression of a gene product is determined by evaluating the phenotypic results of its expression. These assays also may take many forms including but not limited to analyzing changes in the chemical composition, morphology, or physiological properties of the plant. Chemical composition may be altered by expression of genes encoding enzymes or storage proteins which change amino acid composition and may be detected by amino acid analysis, or by enzymes which change starch quantity which may be analyzed by near infrared reflectance spectrometry. Morphological changes may include greater stature or thicker stalks. Most often changes in response of plants or plant parts to imposed treatments are evaluated under carefully controlled conditions termed bioassays.
D. Event Specific Transgene Assays
Southern blotting, PCR and RT-PCR techniques can be used to identify the presence or absence of a given transgene but, depending upon experimental design, may not specifically and uniquely identify identical or related transgene constructs located at different insertion points within the recipient genome. To more precisely characterize the presence of transgenic material in a transformed plant, one skilled in the art could identify the point of insertion of the transgene and, using the sequence of the recipient genome flanking the transgene, develop an assay that specifically and uniquely identifies a particular insertion event. Many methods can be used to determine the point of insertion such as, but not limited to, Genome WalkerTM technology (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, Calif.), VectoretteTM technology (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), restriction site oligonucleotide PCR (Sarkar et al., 1993; Weber et al., 1998), uneven PCR (Chen and Wu, 1997) and generation of genomic DNA clones containing the transgene of interest in a vector such as, but not limited to, lambda phage.
Once the sequence of the genomic DNA directly adjacent to the transgenic insert on either or both sides has been determined, one skilled in the art can develop an assay to specifically and uniquely identify the insertion event. For example, two oligonucleotide primers can be designed, one wholly contained within the transgene and one wholly contained within the flanking sequence, which can be used together with the PCR technique to generate a PCR product unique to the inserted transgene. In one embodiment, the two oligonucleotide primers for use in PCR could be designed such that one primer is complementary to sequences in both the transgene and adjacent flanking sequence such that said primer spans the junction of the insertion site while the second primer could be homologous to sequences contained wholly within the transgene. In another embodiment, the two oligonucleotide primers for use in PCR could be designed such that one primer is complementary to sequences in both the transgene and adjacent flanking sequence such that said primer spans the junction of the insertion site while the second primer could be homologous to sequences contained wholly within the genomic sequence adjacent to the insertion site. Confirmation of the PCR reaction may be monitored by, but not limited to, size analysis on gel electrophoresis, sequence analysis, hybridization of the PCR product to a specific radiolabeled DNA or RNA probe or to a molecular beacon (Tyagi and Kramer, 1996), or use of the primers in conjugation with a TaqManTM probe and technology (PerkinElmer Corporation, Wellesley, Mass.).
IX. Site Specific Integration or Excision of Transgenes
It is specifically contemplated by the inventors that one could employ techniques for the site-specific integration or excision of transformation constructs prepared in accordance with the instant invention. An advantage of site-specific integration or excision is that it can be used to overcome problems associated with conventional transformation techniques, in which transformation constructs typically randomly integrate into a host genome and multiple copies of a construct may integrate. This random insertion of introduced DNA into the genome of host cells can be detrimental to the cell if the foreign DNA inserts into an essential gene. In addition, the expression of a transgene may be influenced by “position effects” caused by the surrounding genomic DNA. Further, because of difficulties associated with plants possessing multiple transgene copies, including gene silencing, recombination and unpredictable inheritance, it is typically desirable to control the copy number of the inserted DNA, often only desiring the insertion of a single copy of the DNA sequence.
Site-specific integration can be achieved in plants by means of homologous recombination (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,527,695, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). Homologous recombination is a reaction between any pair of DNA sequences having a similar sequence of nucleotides, where the two sequences interact (recombine) to form a new recombinant DNA species. The frequency of homologous recombination increases as the length of the shared nucleotide DNA sequences increases, and is higher with linearized plasmid molecules than with circularized plasmid molecules. Homologous recombination can occur between two DNA sequences that are less than identical, but the recombination frequency declines as the divergence between the two sequences increases.
Introduced DNA sequences can be targeted via homologous recombination by linking a DNA molecule of interest to sequences sharing homology with endogenous sequences of the host cell. Once the DNA enters the cell, the two homologous sequences can interact to insert the introduced DNA at the site where the homologous genomic DNA sequences were located. Therefore, the choice of homologous sequences contained on the introduced DNA will determine the site where the introduced DNA is integrated via homologous recombination. For example, if the DNA sequence of interest is linked to DNA sequences sharing homology to a single copy gene of a host plant cell, the DNA sequence of interest will be inserted via homologous recombination at only that single specific site. However, if the DNA sequence of interest is linked to DNA sequences sharing homology to a multicopy gene of the host eukaryotic cell, then the DNA sequence of interest can be inserted via homologous recombination at each of the specific sites where a copy of the gene is located.
DNA can be inserted into the host genome by a homologous recombination reaction involving either a single reciprocal recombination (resulting in the insertion of the entire length of the introduced DNA) or through a double reciprocal recombination (resulting in the insertion of only the DNA located between the two recombination events). For example, if one wishes to insert a foreign gene into the genomic site where a selected gene is located, the introduced DNA should contain sequences homologous to the selected gene. A single homologous recombination event would then result in the entire introduced DNA sequence being inserted into the selected gene. Alternatively, a double recombination event can be achieved by flanking each end of the DNA sequence of interest (the sequence intended to be inserted into the genome) with DNA sequences homologous to the selected gene. A homologous recombination event involving each of the homologous flanking regions will result in the insertion of the foreign DNA. Thus only those DNA sequences located between the two regions sharing genomic homology become integrated into the genome.
Although introduced sequences can be targeted for insertion into a specific genomic site via homologous recombination, in higher eukaryotes homologous recombination is a relatively rare event compared to random insertion events. In plant cells, foreign DNA molecules find homologous sequences in the cell's genome and recombine at a frequency of approximately 0.5–4.2×10−4. Thus any transformed cell that contains an introduced DNA sequence integrated via homologous recombination will also likely contain numerous copies of randomly integrated introduced DNA sequences. Therefore, to maintain control over the copy number and the location of the inserted DNA, these randomly inserted DNA sequences can be removed. One manner of removing these random insertions is to utilize a site-specific recombinase system (U.S. Pat. No. 5,527,695).
A number of different site specific recombinase systems could be employed in accordance with the instant invention, including, but not limited to, the Cre/lox system of bacteriophage P1 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,658,772, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), the FLP/FRT system of yeast (Golic and Lindquist, 1989), the Gin recombinase of phage Mu (Maeser et al., 1991), the Pin recombinase of E. coli (Enomoto et al., 1983), and the R/RS system of the pSR1 plasmid (Araki et al., 1992). The bacteriophage P1 Cre/lox and the yeast FLP/FRT systems constitute two particularly useful systems for site specific integration or excision of transgenes. In these systems, a recombinase (Cre or FLP) will interact specifically with its respective site-specific recombination sequence (lox or FRT, respectively) to invert or excise the intervening sequences. The sequence for each of these two systems is relatively short (34 bp for lox and 47 bp for FRT) and therefore, convenient for use with transformation vectors.
The FLP/FRT recombinase system has been demonstrated to function efficiently in plant cells. Experiments on the performance of the FLP/FRT system in both maize and rice protoplasts indicate that FRT site structure, and amount of the FLP protein present, affects excision activity. In general, short incomplete FRT sites leads to higher accumulation of excision products than the complete full-length FRT sites. The systems can catalyze both intra- and intermolecular reactions in maize protoplasts, indicating its utility for DNA excision as well as integration reactions. The recombination reaction is reversible and this reversibility can compromise the efficiency of the reaction in each direction. Altering the structure of the site-specific recombination sequences is one approach to remedying this situation. The site-specific recombination sequence can be mutated in a manner that the product of the recombination reaction is no longer recognized as a substrate for the reverse reaction, thereby stabilizing the integration or excision event.
In the Cre-lox system, discovered in bacteriophage P1, recombination between lox sites occurs in the presence of the Cre recombinase (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,658,772, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). This system has been utilized to excise a gene located between two lox sites which had been introduced into a yeast genome (Sauer, 1987). Cre was expressed from an inducible yeast GAL1 promoter and this Cre gene was located on an autonomously replicating yeast vector.
Since the lox site is an asymmetrical nucleotide sequence, lox sites on the same DNA molecule can have the same or opposite orientation with respect to each other. Recombination between lox sites in the same orientation results in a deletion of the DNA segment located between the two lox sites and a connection between the resulting ends of the original DNA molecule. The deleted DNA segment forms a circular molecule of DNA. The original DNA molecule and the resulting circular molecule each contain a single lox site. Recombination between lox sites in opposite orientations on the same DNA molecule result in an inversion of the nucleotide sequence of the DNA segment located between the two lox sites. In addition, reciprocal exchange of DNA segments proximate to lox sites located on two different DNA molecules can occur. All of these recombination events are catalyzed by the product of the Cre coding region.
During the transformation process it is often necessary to include ancillary sequences, such as selectable marker or reporter genes, for tracking the presence or absence of a desired trait gene transformed into the plant on the DNA construct. Such ancillary sequences often do not contribute to the desired trait or characteristic conferred by the phenotypic trait gene. Homologous recombination is a method by which introduced sequences may be selectively deleted in transgenic plants.
It is known that homologous recombination results in genetic rearrangements of transgenes in plants. Repeated DNA sequences have been shown to lead to deletion of a flanked sequence in various dicot species, e.g. Arabidopsis thaliana (Swoboda et al., 1994; Jelesko et al., 1999), Brassica napus (Gal et al., 1991; Swoboda et al., 1993) and Nicotiana tabacum (Peterhans et al., 1990; Zubko et al., 2000). One of the most widely held models for homologous recombination is the double-strand break repair (DSBR) model (Szostak et al., 1983).
Deletion of sequences by homologous recombination relies upon directly repeated DNA sequences positioned about the region to be excised in which the repeated DNA sequences direct excision utilizing native cellular recombination mechanisms. The first fertile transgenic plants are crossed to produce either hybrid or inbred progeny plants, and from those progeny plants, one or more second fertile transgenic plants are selected which contain a second DNA sequence that has been altered by recombination, preferably resulting in the deletion of the ancillary sequence. The first fertile plant can be either hemizygous or homozygous for the DNA sequence containing the directly repeated DNA which will drive the recombination event.
The directly repeated sequences are located 5′ and 3′ to the target sequence in the transgene. As a result of the recombination event, the transgene target sequence may be deleted, amplified or otherwise modified within the plant genome. In the preferred embodiment, a deletion of the target sequence flanked by the directly repeated sequence will result.
X. Breeding Plants of the Invention
In addition to direct transformation of a particular plant genotype with a construct prepared according to the current invention, transgenic plants may be made by crossing a plant having a construct of the invention to a second plant lacking the construct. For example, a selected coding region operably linked to a chloroplast F16BP aldolase promoter can be introduced into a particular plant variety by crossing, without the need for ever directly transforming a plant of that given variety. Therefore, the current invention not only encompasses a plant directly regenerated from cells which have been transformed in accordance with the current invention, but also the progeny of such plants. As used herein the term “progeny” denotes the offspring of any generation of a parent plant prepared in accordance with the instant invention, wherein the progeny comprises a construct prepared in accordance with the invention. “Crossing” a plant to provide a plant line having one or more added transgenes relative to a starting plant line, as disclosed herein, is defined as the techniques that result in a transgene of the invention being introduced into a plant line by crossing a starting line with a donor plant line that comprises a transgene of the invention. To achieve this one could, for example, perform the following steps:
(a) plant seeds of the first (starting line) and second (donor plant line that comprises a transgene of the invention) parent plants;
(b) grow the seeds of the first and second parent plants into plants that bear flowers;
(c) pollinate a flower from the first parent plant with pollen from the second parent plant; and
(d) harvest seeds produced on the parent plant bearing the fertilized flower.
Backcrossing is herein defined as the process including the steps of:
(a) crossing a plant of a first genotype containing a desired gene, DNA sequence or element to a plant of a second genotype lacking said desired gene, DNA sequence or element;
(b) selecting one or more progeny plant containing the desired gene, DNA sequence or element;
(c) crossing the progeny plant to a plant of the second genotype; and
(d) repeating steps (b) and (c) for the purpose of transferring said desired gene, DNA sequence or element from a plant of a first genotype to a plant of a second genotype.
Introgression of a DNA element into a plant genotype is defined as the result of the process of backcross conversion. A plant genotype into which a DNA sequence has been introgressed may be referred to as a backcross converted genotype, line, inbred, or hybrid. Similarly a plant genotype lacking said desired DNA sequence may be referred to as an unconverted genotype, line, inbred, or hybrid.
XI. Definitions
Genetic Transformation: A process of introducing a DNA sequence or construct (e.g., a vector or expression cassette) into a cell or protoplast in which that exogenous DNA is incorporated into a chromosome or is capable of autonomous replication.
Exogenous gene: A gene which is not normally present in a given host genome in the exogenous gene's present form In this respect, the gene itself may be native to the host genome, however, the exogenous gene will comprise the native gene altered by the addition or deletion of one or more different regulatory elements.
Expression: The combination of intracellular processes, including transcription and translation undergone by a coding DNA molecule such as a structural gene to produce a polypeptide.
Expression cassette: A chimeric DNA molecule which is designed for introduction into a host genome by genetic transformation. Preferred expression cassettes will comprise all of the genetic elements necessary to direct the expression of a selected gene. Expression cassettes prepared in accordance with the instant invention will include a maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter.
Expression vector: A vector comprising at least one expression cassette.
Obtaining: When used in conjunction with a transgenic plant cell or transgenic plant, obtaining means either transforming a non-transgenic plant cell or plant to create the transgenic plant cell or plant, or planting transgenic plant seed to produce the transgenic plant cell or plant.
Progeny: Any subsequent generation, including the seeds and plants therefrom, which is derived from a particular parental plant or set of parental plants.
Promoter: A recognition site on a DNA sequence or group of DNA sequences that provides an expression control element for a structural gene and to which RNA polymerase specifically binds and initiates RNA synthesis (transcription) of that gene.
R0 Transgenic Plant: A plant which has been directly transformed with a selected DNA or has been regenerated from a cell or cell cluster which has been transformed with a selected DNA.
Regeneration: The process of growing a plant from a plant cell (e.g., plant protoplast, callus or explant).
Selected DNA: A DNA segment which one desires to introduce into a plant genome by genetic transformation.
Selected Gene: A gene which one desires to have expressed in a transgenic plant, plant cell or plant part. A selected gene may be native or foreign to a host genome, but where the selected gene is present in the host genome, will include one or more regulatory or functional elements which differ from native copies of the gene.
Transformation construct: A chimeric DNA molecule which is designed for introduction into a host genome by genetic transformation. Preferred transformation constructs will comprise all of the genetic elements necessary to direct the expression of one or more exogenous genes. Transformation constructs prepared in accordance with the instant invention will include a chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter. In particular embodiments of the instant invention, it may be desirable to introduce a transformation construct into a host cell in the form of an expression cassette.
Transformed cell: A cell the DNA complement of which has been altered by the introduction of an exogenous DNA molecule into that cell.
Transgene: A segment of DNA which has been incorporated into a host genome or is capable of autonomous replication in a host cell and is capable of causing the expression of one or more cellular products. Exemplary transgenes will provide the host cell, or plants regenerated therefrom, with a novel phenotype relative to the corresponding non-transformed cell or plant. Transgenes may be directly introduced into a plant by genetic transformation, or may be inherited from a plant of any previous generation which was transformed with the DNA segment.
Transgenic plant: A plant or progeny plant of any subsequent generation derived therefrom, wherein the DNA of the plant or progeny thereof contains an introduced exogenous DNA segment not originally present in a non-transgenic plant of the same strain. The transgenic plant may additionally contain sequences which are native to the plant being transformed, but wherein the “exogenous” gene has been altered in order to alter the level or pattern of expression of the gene.
Transit peptide: A polypeptide sequence which is capable of directing a polypeptide to a particular organelle or other location within a cell.
Vector: A DNA molecule capable of replication in a host cell and/or to which another DNA segment can be operatively linked so as to bring about replication of the attached segment. A plasmid is an exemplary vector.
XII. EXAMPLES
The following examples are included to illustrate preferred embodiments of the invention. It should be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the techniques disclosed in the examples which follow represent techniques discovered by the inventor to function well in the practice of the invention, and thus can be considered to constitute preferred modes for its practice. However, those of skill in the art should, in light of the present disclosure, appreciate that many changes can be made in the specific embodiments which are disclosed and still obtain a like or similar result without departing from the concept, spirit and scope of the invention. More specifically, it will be apparent that certain agents which are both chemically and physiologically related may be substituted for the agents described herein while the same or similar results would be achieved. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The utility of transgene expression in plants is a function on the transgene's promoter. The number of effective promoters available for use with transgenes in plants is limited. New promoters, especially promoters that will express differentially in plant tissues, such as those that are spatially and/or temporally expressed or are induced to express by different environmental signals, would have significant utility in transgenic plants. Such expression specific promoters could be useful in minimizing yield drag and other potential adverse physiological effects on maize growth and development that might be encountered by constitutive expression of a particular transgenic proteins in maize plants. For example, a corn drought resistance gene under the control of a stress-induced promoter, would be especially useful in this respect.
The current inventors have demonstrated the utility of a novel maize promoter, designated the Zea mays chloroplastic fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (F16BP) aldolase promoter, in transgenic plants, particularly maize. The chloroplast F16BP aldolase promoter was isolated from a maize B73 genomic library and fused to the uidA reporter gene (Jefferson et al., 1986) with intron 1 from the rice actin 1 gene (McElroy et al., 1990) and nos 3′ terminator (Bevan et al., 1983; see Example 2). The promoter of the current invention was shown to be functionally active alone and in conjunction with the rice actin 1 intron 1 described by Zhang et al., 1991.
Example 1 
Isolation of a Zea mays Chloroplastic F16BP Aldolase Promoter
A fragment of a maize aldolase cDNA was isolated and used as described herein to isolate the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter from a Zea mays B73 genomic library. Collar/sheath tissue was collected from pre-tasseling maize plants, RNA was extracted and a cDNA library was prepared using the phagemid vector Lambda ZAPTM (STRATAGENE, La Jolla, Calif.). The collar/sheath cDNA plasmid library was excised from the Lambda ZAPTM phagemid, transformed into E. coli cells and 672 colonies were selected and bound to duplicate nitrocellulose filters for dot-blot analysis. One set of dot-blot filters was probed with 32P labeled, reverse-transcribed B73 poly(A+)RNA isolated from collar/sheath tissue collected from pre-tasseling plants. The duplicate dot-blot filters were probed with 32P labeled, reverse-transcribed B73 poly(A+)RNA isolated from kernel tissue collected from ears 18 to 30 days after pollination, preferably selected from kernel tissue collected from ears at 22 days after pollination.
Clones that hybridized with the collar/sheath cDNA probe but not the kernel cDNA probe were selected for further analysis. Maize line B73 genomic DNA (gDNA) was digested with Sac I or Eco RI and several Southern blots prepared (Southern, 1975). Northern blots (Sambrook, Fritsch and Maniatis, 1989) were prepared to contain RNA isolated from B73 collar/sheath or kernel tissue. The blots were probed with cDNA inserts from the collar/sheath positive, kernel negative cDNAs isolated from the collar/sheath cDNA library. Clones that were low or single copy on the Southern blot and specific for collar/sheath RNA on the Northern blot were partially sequenced. Southern blots were carried out using high stringency conditions of hybridization at 65°–68° C. and final wash conditions of 0.2% SSC and 0.1% SDS also at 65°–68° C. Northern blots were carried out using lower stringency conditions of hybridization at room temperature in the presence of 50% formamide, with final washes carried out in 0.5% SSC and 0.5% SDS at room temperature, although one of skill in the art could vary the stringency of the hybridization of either the Northern or the Southern blots as well as the stringency of the wash to generate similar data. Sequences obtained were compared against GenBank using BLAST alignment tools (default parameters). A sequence (SEQ ID NO:1) located within a clone, designated 3A2, was found to share some sequence homology to a rice chloroplastic aldolase gene (GenBank Accession number D13513; Tsutsumi et al., 1994). Thus, clone 3A2 was believed to contain a fragment of a maize chloroplastic aldolase gene and was used as a probe to isolate a maize chloroplastic aldolase promoter.
Clone 3A2 was then used to isolate the maize chloroplast F16BP aldolase promoter from maize B73 lambda gDNA library. B73 gDNA was partially digested with Sau3A restriction enzyme and size separated via centrifugation on a 10–40% sucrose gradient followed by fraction collection. Sub-samples from each fraction were electrophoresed on a 0.4% agarose gel and fractions containing fragments in the size ranges of approximately >20 Kb, between approximately 10 to 20 Kb and <10 Kb, were selected for purification. The Sau 3A fragments between approximately 10 to 20 Kb were cloned into Bam HI arms of phagemid vector Lambda EMBL3TM (STRATAGENE, La Jolla, Calif.). The resulting Lambda EMBL3TM library was subsequently blotted onto nitrocellulose and probed with the maize insert in clone 3A2. Eight different plaques that hybridized to the probe were subjected to multiple rounds of screening until single clone purity was obtained. DNA from each lambda clone was characterized by restriction mapping and Southern blot analysis, wherein B73 gDNA and DNA from the different plaques was digested with at least 10 different restriction enzymes. A single clone, denoted 3A2, with a banding pattern most similar to that of the gDNA, was selected and found to contain an insert of 6.6 Kb. This 6.6 Kb fragment, containing the putative maize chloroplastic aldolase promoter region, was removed by digestion with Sal I and subcloned into plasmid vector pUC19. Sequence alignments with BLAST analysis tools (using default parameters) showed that the B73 genomic fragment in 3A2 contained sequences with homology to exon 1, including the transit peptide, intron 1 and a portion of exon 2 from a rice chloroplastic fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase gene (Genbank Accession number D13513; Tsutsumi et al., 1994). Sequences 5′ to the regions showing homology to the rice aldolase gene contained sequences for a maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter.
An approximately 1 Kb portion of the 6.6 Kb fragment was labled with 32P and used as a probe to localize the 3A2 sequence in the maize genome. Recombinant inbred population T×CM (T232×CM27 RI) was used. The 3A2 sequence maps to chromosome 10S, in bin 10.03, near markers npi250a and umc130.
Example 2 
Construction of Chloroplastic F16BP Aldolase Promoter Containing Transformation Vectors
This example descibes the creation of vector pDPG595. Sequence characterization of a portion of the 6.6 Kb genomic fragment in clone 3A2 revealed homology to the rice chloroplastic aldolase exon I (including the transit peptide), intron 1 and the 5′ portion of exon 2. Sequences 5′ to these regions were found to constitute the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter. Cloning of the second exon of the putative promoter with the uidA/nos terminator fragment in vector pDPG141 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,990,390) necessitated the creation of an Nco I site within the genomic clone. A non-phosphorylated linker (SEQ ID NO:3 and SEQ ID NO:4) containing the 3′ end of the 3A2 intron 1 and 5′ end of exon 2 was synthesized to contain Sph I and Nco I restriction sites, respectively. The linker was made by hybridizing the two oligonucleotides together to generate the Sph I and Nco I sites (SEQ ID NO:3 and SEQ ID NO:4):








5′ CTGTGTATACGTACGTACGTACGTATGTGTGGACAGAAAACGATCGCGTCGCC 3′



 


GTACGACACATATGCATGCATGCATGCATACACACCTGTCTTTTGCTAGCGCAGCGGGTAC






The synthesized linker was ligated to an Sph I/Nco I fragment of vector pDPG141 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,990,390) containing the uidA/nos terminator and vector backbone. An approximately 2.2 Kb Sph I fragment of 3A2, containing the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, exon I (including the transit peptide), intron 1 and the 5′ portion of exon 2 was ligated to the synthetic linker/uidA/nos terminator construct to generate plasmid pDPG595 (FIG. 1).

Approximately 1864 bp of the putative maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter (SEQ ID NO:2; FIG. 2) was joined with the rice actin 1 intron 1 and the uidA/nos terminator expression cassette in a three way ligation with: 1) an approximately 1.8 Kb Bgl II/Sac I fragment from clone 3A2 was joined with 2) an approximately 500 bp Sac I/Nco I rice actin 1 intron 1 fragment (U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,876; modified at the 3′ end to generate an Nco I site for cloning purposes) and 3) an approximately 5 Kb Nco I/Bgl II uidA/nos terminator/vector backbone from pDPG595. The resultant vector was designated pDPG712 (FIG. 3).
Example 3 
Transient Expression Analysis of Maize Chloroplastic F16BP Aldolase Promoter Function
Histochemical staining (Table 8) was used for analysis of expression of the uidA reporter gene (E. coli beta-glucuronidase; Jefferson et al., 1986) fused to the maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter of the invention with an actin 1 intron 1 (PCT Publication WO 00/70067; pDPG595) or with the rice actin 1 promoter/intron 1 construct (pAct1-D; Zhang et al., 1991). Transient expression analysis was performed using A188×B73 derived suspension cultures using 1×6 (716) (U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,318, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) callus suspension cells, and excised maize root and leaf tissue. Equal molar concentrations (50 uM) of plasmid DNA were precipitated onto 1.0 micron gold particles and introduced into the tissues by microprojectile bombardment. For the histochemical staining, bombarded tissues were incubated for approximately 40 hrs at 24° C., followed by incubation in buffered solution containing 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl glucuronide (X-gluc), overnight at 37° C. Assays for transient expression of GUS were performed as described by Jefferson (1987). Expression levels from the maize F16BP promoter/uidA reporter gene fusion constructs (FIG. 1) relative to levels from the rice actin 1 promoter/intron 1/uidA reporter construct (pAct1-D; Zhang et al., 1991) were visually assessed, as indicated in Table 8.







TABLE 8







Promoter activity in transient assays of microparticle bombarded maize


cells: in situ histochemical staining of uidA reporter gene expression.

















Relative GUS








Activity in
Relative GUS
Relative GUS






Susp. Culture
Activity in
Activity in


Promoter
Intron
Reporter
3′
Cells
Leaf Tissue
Root Tissue





rice actin 1
rice actin 1
uidA
nos
++++
++++
++


Maize
maize
uidA
nos
+++
+
++


F16BP
F16BP


(pDPG595)
(pDPG595)









Example 4 
Stable Maize Transformation with Maize Chloroplastic F16BP Promoter Transformation Vectors
The maize chloroplastic F16BP promoter/rice actin 1 intron 1/uidA/nos terminator vector in vector pDPG712 was introduced into HiII immature embryos using the technique of Example 6. Transgenic calli were identified for the promoter construct and transformed maize plants were regenerated. Small regenerated plants from a number of independent transformation events were assayed for GUS activity by histochemical staining and were positive for uidA reporter gene expression. The Ro plants were crossed to a proprietary inbred line (CV) and resultant R1 plant progeny, as well as progeny of subsequent generations, were analyzed for GUS expression.
In stably transformed maize plants produced from seed, the chloroplast F16BP aldolase promoter/rice actin 1 intron 1/uidA/nos terminator construct was shown to drive expression of GUS protein in the aleurone, embryo and pedicel of developing kernels 39 days post-pollination. GUS expression as directed by the maize chloroplastic F16BP promoter was observed in the embryo and coleoptile of newly germinating seeds. The germinating seeds ranged in age from imbibition to the two leaf stage, and were preferably collected at 7 days post-germination. Furthermore, the F16BP aldolase promoter construct was shown to drive expression of high levels of GUS protein in bundle sheath cells in leaf, collar and sheath tissue of seedlings. The seedlings ranged in age from seven days post-germination to the four leaf stage, and were preferably collected at the two leaf stage. GUS expression as directed by the maize chloroplastic F16BP promoter was seen in leaf, root and stem tissue of young plants grown from maize seed. The young maize plants ranged in age from the two leaf stage to 48 days post-germination, and were preferably collected at the three to four leaf stage. The F16BP aldolase promoter construct was shown to drive GUS expression in leaf, stalk, ligule and husk tissue of mature plants. The mature plants ranged in age up to anthesis, and were preferably sampled at 48 days post-germination. In the male inflorescence, the F16BP aldolase promoter construct was shown to drive expression of GUS in pollen, glume and anther tissue. The F16BP aldolase promoter construct was also shown to drive expression of GUS in the bundle sheath cells in the outer and inner husks of ear shoots and in the stem and some silks in the female inflorescence tissue.
Example 5 
Preparation of Microprojectiles
Microprojectiles were prepared by adding 60 mg of 0.6 μm gold particles (BioRad, cat. no. 165-2262) to 1000 μl absolute ethanol and incubating for at least 3 hours at room temperature followed by storage at −20° C. Twenty to thirty five μl of the sterile gold particles or more preferably 30 to 35 μl of gold particles (30 μl contains 1.8 mg of particles) were centrifuged in a microcentrifuge for up to 1 min. The supernatant was removed and one ml sterile water was added to the tube, followed by centrifugation at 1800–2000 rpm for 2-5 minutes. Microprojectile particles were resuspended in 30 μl of DNA solution containing about 500 ng of vector DNA.
Two hundred twenty microliters sterile water, 250 μl 2.5 M CaCl2 and 50 μl stock spermidine (14 μl spermidine in 986 μl water) were then added to the particle containing solution. The solution was then thoroughly mixed and placed on ice, followed by vortexing at 4° C. for 10 minutes and centrifugation at 500 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant was removed and the pellet resuspended in 600 μl absolute ethanol. Following centrifugation at 500 rpm for 5 minutes, the pellet was resuspended in 36–38 μl of absolute ethanol, vortexed for approximately 20 seconds, and sonicated for 20–30 seconds. At this stage the particles were typically allowed to sit for 2–5 minutes, after which 5–10 μl of the supernatant was removed and dispensed on the surface of a flyer disk and the ethanol was allowed to dry completely. Alternatively, particles may be removed directly after resuspension and vortexing 20 to 30 seconds in 36 μl–38 μl of ethanol, placed on the flyer disk and allowed to dry as done for the settled treatment. The bombardment chamber was then evacuated to approximately 28 in. Hg prior to bombardment. The particles were then used for bombardment by a helium blast of approximately 1100 psi using the DuPont Biolistics PDS1000He particle bombardment device.
Example 6 
Bombardment of Hi-II Immature Embryos
Immature embryos (1.2–3.0 mm in length) of the corn genotype Hi-II were excised from surface-sterilized, greenhouse-grown ears of Hi-II 10–12 days post-pollination. The Hi-II genotype was developed from an A188×B73 cross (Armstrong et al., 1991). Approximately 30 embryos per petri dish were plated axis side down on a modified N6 medium containing 1 mg/l 2,4-D, 100 mg/l casein hydrolysate, 2.9 g/L L-proline, 16.9 mg/L silver nitrate, 2 mg/L L-glycine, and 2% sucrose solidified with 2 g/l Gelgro, pH 5.8 (#201V medium). Embryos were cultured in the dark for two to six days at 24° C.
Approximately 3–4 hours prior to bombardment, embryos were transferred to the above culture medium with the sucrose concentration increased from 3% to 12%. When embryos were transferred to the high osmoticum medium they were arranged in concentric circles on the plate, starting 1 cm from the center of the dish, positioned such that their coleorhizal end was orientated toward the center of the dish. Usually two concentric circles were formed with 25–35 embryos per plate.
The plates containing embryos were placed on the third shelf from the bottom, 5 cm below the stopping screen. The 1100 psi rupture discs were used for bombardment. Each plate of embryos was bombarded once with the DuPont Biolistics PDS1000He particle gun. Following bombardment, embryos were allowed to recover on high osmoticum medium (#201SV, 12% sucrose) overnight (16–24 hours) and were then transferred to selection medium containing 1 mg/l bialaphos (plus 1 mg/l bialaphos). Embryos were maintained in the dark at 24° C. After three to four weeks on the initial selection plates about 90% of the embryos typically formed Type II callus and were transferred to selective medium containing 3 mg/l bialaphos (#201D). Southern or PCR analysis can then be used for analysis of transformants and assays of gene expression may be carried out.
Transformed callus is maintained on medium #204D. Regeneration of plants is initiated by transfer of callus to MS medium containing 0.04 mg/L NAA and 3 mg/L BAP (medium #105). Tissue is cultured in the dark for two weeks, followed by two weeks of culture on fresh medium #105 in low light. Tissue is subsequently transferred to MS medium with 6% sucrose without growth regulators (medium #110) and cultured in low light. Tissue is subcultured once in Petri dishes, followed by two subcultures on #110 medium in PHYTATRAYS. Regenerated plants are transferred from PHYTATRAYS to soil and grown further in a growth chamber or greenhouse. Tissue in PHYTATRAYS is grown under high light in a growth chamber.
Example 7 
Methods for Microprojectile Bombardment
Many variations in techniques for microprojectile bombardment are well known in the art and therefore deemed useful with the current invention. Exemplary procedures for bombardment are discussed in, for example, PCT Publication No. WO 95/06128, the disclosure of which is specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Examples of target tissues which may be used with the current invention include immature embryos, Type I callus, Type II callus, Type III callus, suspension cultures and meristematic tissue (PCT Publication WO 96/04392). Some genotypes which are especially useful for maize transformation are specifically disclosed herein above, as well as in, for example, PCT Publication WO 95/06128. Preferred genotypes will be those which are readily transformable and which also may be regenerated to yield a fertile transgenic plant.
Any method for acceleration of microprojectiles may potentially be used to transform a plant cell with the current invention. A preferred method will be a gas-driven particle gun such as the DuPont Biolistics PDS1000He particle bombardment device. Exemplary particles for bombardment include those comprised of tungsten, gold, platinum, and the like. Gold particles are deemed particularly useful in the current invention, with 0.6 μm or 0.7 μm gold particles being preferred and 0.6 μm particles most preferred. The most preferred particles will be DNA coated and have a mean size between 0.6 μm and 1.0 μm. Alternatively, particles may be allowed to settle for 2–5 minutes following precipitation of DNA onto particles. Particles are then removed from the supernatant and used for microprojectile bombardment. It is believed that the settling step enriches for a population of particles coated with DNA in which fewer aggregates of particles are present.
As disclosed herein, any DNA sequence may potentially be used for transformation. The DNA segments used for transformation will preferably include one or more selectable, secretable or screenable markers. Many examples of such are well known in the art and are specifically disclosed herein. In the case of selectable markers, selection may be in solid or liquid media. The DNA segments used will preferably also include one or more genes which confer, either individually or in combination with other sequences, a desired phenotype on the transformed plant. Exemplary genes for transformation and the corresponding phenotypes these sequences may confer on the transformed plant are disclosed herein.
Example 8 
Transformation of Maize Using Agrobacterium tumefaciens 
Methods of Agrobacterium mediated transformation of maize cells and other monocots are known (Hiei et al., 1997; U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,616; U.S. Pat. No. 5,981,840; published EP patent application EP 0 672 752). Although various strains of Agrobacterium may be used (see references above), strain ABI is used preferably by the present inventors. The ABI strain of Agrobacterium is derived from strain A208, a C58 nopaline type strain, from which the Ti plasmid was eliminated by culture at 37° C., and further containing the modified Ti plasmid pMP90RK (Koncz and Schell, 1986). An Agrobacterium tumefaciens binary vector system (An et al., 1998) is preferably used to transform maize. Alternative cointegrating Ti plasmid vectors have been described (Rogers et al., 1988) and could be used to transform maize. A binary vector comprising one or more genes of interest may be introduced into a disarmed Agrobacterium strain using electroporation (Wen-jun and Forde, 1989) or triparental mating (Ditta et al., 1980). A binary vector may contain a selectable marker gene, a screenable marker gene and/or one or more genes that confer a desirable phenotypic trait on the transformed plant. An exemplary binary vector, pMON30113, is shown in FIG. 4. Other binary vectors may be used and are known to those of skill in the art.
Prior to co-culture of maize cells, Agrobacterium cells may be grown at 28° C. in LB (DIFCO) liquid medium comprising appropriate antibiotics to select for maintenance of the modified Ti plasmid and binary vector. For example, ABI/pMON30113, may be grown in LB medium containing 50 ug/ml kanamycin to select for maintenance of the pMP90RK modified Ti plasmid and 100 ug/ml spectinomycin to select for maintenance of the binary vector pMON30113. It will be obvious to one of skill in the art to use appropriate selection agents to maintain plasmids in the host Agrobacterium strain. Prior to inoculation of maize cells, Agrobacterium cells are grown overnight at room temperature in AB medium (Chilton et al., 1974) comprising appropriate antibiotics for plasmid maintenance and 200 uM acetosyringone. Immediately prior to inoculation of maize cells, Agrobacterium are preferably pelleted by centrifugation, washed in 1⁄2 MSVI medium (1.1 g/L GIBCO MS salts, 2 mg/L glycine, 0.5 g/L niacin, 0.5 g/L L-pyridoxine-HCl, 0.1 mg/L thiamine, 115 g/L L-proline, 10 g/L D-glucose, and 10 g/L sucrose, pH 5.4) containing 200 uM acetosyringone, and resuspended at 0.1 to 1.0×109 cells/ml in 1⁄2 MSPL medium (1.1 g/L GIBCO MS salts, 2 mg/L glycine, 0.5 g/L niacin, 0.5 g/L L-pyridoxine-HCl, 0.1 mg/L thiamine, 115 g/L L-proline, 26 g/L D-glucose, 68.5 g/L sucrose, pH 5.4) containing 200 uM acetosyringone. One of skill in the art may substitute other media for 1⁄2 MSPL.
Immature maize embryos are isolated as described previously. Embryos are inoculated with Agrobacterium 0–7 days after excision, preferably immediately after excision. Alternatively, immature embryos may be cultured for more than 7 days. For example, embryogenic callus may be initiated as described above and co-cultured with Agrobacterium. Preferably, immature maize embryos are excised, immersed in an Agrobacterium suspension in 1⁄2 MSPL medium prepared as described above and incubated at room temperature with Agrobacterium for 5–20 minutes.
Following inoculation embryos are transferred to one-half strength MS medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) containing 3.0 mg/L 2,4-dichlorophenyoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 1% D-glucose, 2% sucrose, 0.115 g/L L-proline, 0.5 mg/L thiamine-HCl, 200 uM acetosyringone, and 20 uM silver nitrate or silver thiosulfate. Immature embryos are co-cultured with Agrobacterium for 1 to 3 days at 23° C. in the dark. One of skill in the art may substitute other media for the described media.
Co-cultured embryos are transferred to medium 15AA (462 mg/L (NH4)SO4, 400 mg/L KH2PO4, 186 mg/L MgSO4-7H20, 166 mg/L CaCl2-2H20, 10 mg/L MnSO4-H2O, 3 mg/L H3B03, 2 mg/L ZnSO4-7H20, 0.25 mg/L NaMoO4-2H20, 0.025 mg/L CuSO4-5H20, 0.025 mg/L CoCl2-6H20, 0.75 mg/L KI, 2.83 g/L KNO3, 0.2 mg/L niacin, 0.1 mg/L thiamine-HCl, 0.2 mg/L pyridoxine-HCl, 0.1 mg/L D-biotin, 0.1 mg/L choline chloride, 0.1 mg/L calcium pantothenate, 0.05 mg/L folic acid, 0.05 mg/L p-aminobenzoic acid, 0.05 mg/L riboflavin, 0.015 mg/L vitamin B12, 0.5 g/L casamino acids, 33.5 mg/L Na2EDTA, 1.38 g/L L-proline, 20 g/L sucrose, 10 g/L D-glucose), or MS medium containing 1.5 mg/L 2,4-D, 500 mg/L carbenicillin, 3% sucrose, 1.38 g/L L-proline and 20 uM silver nitrate or silver thiosulfate and cultured for 0 to 8 days in the dark at 27° C. without selection. Culture media used for selection of transformants and regeneration of plants preferably contains 500 mg/L carbenicillin. One of skill in the art may substitute other antibiotics that control growth of Agrobacterium. Other culture media that support cell culture may be used alternatively. In the absence of a delay of selection (0 day culture), selection may be initiated on 25 mg/L paromomycin. Selection medium may comprise medium 211 (described above) or a variant of medium 211 in which N6 salts are replaced by MS salts. After two weeks, embryogenic callus are transferred to culture medium containing 100 mg/L paromomycin and subcultured at about two week intervals. When selection is delayed following co-culture, embryos were initially cultured on medium containing 50 mg/L paromomycin followed by subsequent culture of embryogenic callus on medium containing 100–200 mg/L paromomycin. One of skill in the art will culture tissue on concentrations of paromomycin which inhibit growth of cells lacking the selectable marker gene, but a concentration on which transformed callus will proliferate. Alternatively, one may use other selectable markers to identify transformed cells. It is believed that initial culture on 25 to 50 mg/L paromocyin for about two weeks, followed by culture on 50–200 mg/L paromoycin will result in recovery of transformed callus. Transformants are recovered 6 to 8 weeks after initiation of selection. Plants are regenerated from transformed embryogenic callus as described above for transformants recovered following microprojectile bombardment.
Example 9 
Introgression of Transgenes Into Elite Varieties
Backcrossing can be used to improve a starting plant. Backcrossing transfers a specific desirable trait from one source to an inbred or other plant that lacks that trait. This can be accomplished, for example, by first crossing a superior inbred (A) (recurrent parent) to a donor inbred (non-recurrent parent), which carries the appropriate gene(s) for the trait in question, for example, a construct prepared in accordance with the current invention. The progeny of this cross first are selected in the resultant progeny for the desired trait to be transferred from the non-recurrent parent, then the selected progeny are mated back to the superior recurrent parent (A). After five or more backcross generations with selection for the desired trait, the progeny are hemizygous for loci controlling the characteristic being transferred, but are like the superior parent for most or almost all other genes. The last backcross generation would be selfed to give progeny which are pure breeding for the gene(s) being transferred, i.e. one or more transformation events.
Therefore, through a series a breeding manipulations, a selected transgene may be moved from one line into an entirely different line without the need for further recombinant manipulation. Transgenes are valuable in that they typically behave genetically as any other gene and can be manipulated by breeding techniques in a manner identical to any other corn gene. Therefore, one may produce inbred plants which are true breeding for one or more transgenes. By crossing different inbred plants, one may produce a large number of different hybrids with different combinations of transgenes. In this way, plants may be produced which have the desirable agronomic properties frequently associated with hybrids (“hybrid vigor”), as well as the desirable characteristics imparted by one or more transgene(s).
Example 10 
Marker Assisted Selection
Genetic markers may be used to assist in the introgression of one or more transgenes of the invention from one genetic background into another. Marker assisted selection offers advantages relative to conventional breeding in that it can be used to avoid errors caused by phenotypic variations. Further, genetic markers may provide data regarding the relative degree of elite germplasm in the individual progeny of a particular cross. For example, when a plant with a desired trait which otherwise has a non-agronomically desirable genetic background is crossed to an elite parent, genetic markers may be used to select progeny which not only possess the trait of interest, but also have a relatively large proportion of the desired germplasm. In this way, the number of generations required to introgress one or more traits into a particular genetic background is minimized.
In the process of marker assisted breeding, DNA sequences are used to follow desirable agronomic traits in the process of plant breeding (Tanksley et al., 1989). Marker assisted breeding may be undertaken as follows. Seed of plants with the desired trait are planted in soil in the greenhouse or in the field. Leaf tissue is harvested from the plant for preparation of DNA at any point in growth at which approximately one gram of leaf tissue can be removed from the plant without compromising the viability of the plant. Genomic DNA is isolated using a procedure modified from Shure et al. (1983). Approximately one gram of leaf tissue from a seedling is lypholyzed overnight in 15 ml polypropylene tubes. Freeze-dried tissue is ground to a powder in the tube using a glass rod. Powdered tissue is mixed thoroughly with 3 ml extraction buffer (7.0 urea, 0.35 M NaCI, 0.05 M Tris-HCI pH 8.0, 0.01 M EDTA, 1% sarcosine). Tissue/buffer homogenate is extracted with 3 ml phenol/chloroform. The aqueous phase is separated by centrifugation, and precipitated twice using 1/10 volume of 4.4 M ammonium acetate pH 5.2, and an equal volume of isopropanol. The precipitate is washed with 75% ethanol and resuspended in 100–500 μl TE (0.01 M Tris-HCI, 0.001 M EDTA, pH 8.0).
Genomic DNA is then digested with a 3-fold excess of restriction enzymes, electrophoresed through 0.8% agarose (FMC), and transferred (Southern, 1975) to Nytran using 10×SCP (20 SCP: 2M NaCl, 0.6 M disodium phosphate, 0.02 M disodium EDTA). The filters are prehybridized in 6×SCP, 10% dextran sulfate, 2% sarcosine, and 500 μg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA and 32P-labeled probe generated by random priming (Feinberg & Vogelstein, 1983). Hybridized filters are washed in 2×SCP, 1% SDS at 65° C. for 30 minutes and visualized by autoradiography using Kodak XAR5 film. Genetic polymorphisms which are genetically linked to traits of interest are thereby used to predict the presence or absence of the traits of interest.
Those of skill in the art will recognize that there are many different ways to isolate DNA from plant tissues and that there are many different protocols for Southern hybridization that will produce identical results. Those of skill in the art will recognize that a Southern blot can be stripped of radioactive probe following autoradiography and re-probed with a different probe. In this manner one may identify each of the various transgenes that are present in the plant. Further, one of skill in the art will recognize that any type of genetic marker which is polymorphic at the region(s) of interest may be used for the purpose of identifying the relative presence or absence of a trait, and that such information may be used for marker assisted breeding.
Each lane of a Southern blot represents DNA isolated from one plant. Through the use of multiplicity of gene integration events as probes on the same genomic DNA blot, the integration event composition of each plant may be determined. Correlations may be established between the contributions of particular integration events to the phenotype of the plant. Only those plants that contain a desired combination of integration events may be advanced to maturity and used for pollination. DNA probes corresponding to particular transgene integration events are useful markers during the course of plant breeding to identify and combine particular integration events without having to grow the plants and assay the plants for agronomic performance.
It is expected that one or more restriction enzymes will be used to digest genomic DNA, either singly or in combinations. One of skill in the art will recognize that many different restriction enzymes will be useful and the choice of restriction enzyme will depend on the DNA sequence of the transgene integration event that is used as a probe and the DNA sequences in the genome surrounding the transgene. For a probe, one will want to use DNA or RNA sequences which will hybridize to the DNA used for transformation. One will select a restriction enzyme that produces a DNA fragment following hybridization that is identifiable as the transgene integration event. Thus, particularly useful restriction enzymes will be those which reveal polymorphisms that are genetically linked to specific transgenes or traits of interest.
Example 11 
General Methods for Assays
DNA analysis of transformed plants is performed as follows. Genomic DNA is isolated using a procedure modified from Shure et al., 1983. Approximately 1 gm callus or leaf tissue is ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. Powdered tissue is mixed thoroughly with 4 ml extraction buffer (7.0 M urea, 0.35 M NaCl, 0.05 M Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.01 M EDTA, 1% sarcosine). Tissue/buffer homogenate is extracted with 4 ml phenol/chloroform. The aqueous phase is separated by centrifugation, passed through Miracloth, and precipitated twice using 1/10 volume of 4.4 M ammonium acetate, pH 5.2 and an equal volume of isopropanol. The precipitate is washed with 70% ethanol and resuspended in 200–500 μl TE (0.01 M Tris-HCl, 0.001 M EDTA, pH 8.0).
The presence of a DNA sequence in a transformed cell may be detected through the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Using this technique specific fragments of DNA can be amplified and detected following agarose gel electrophoresis. For example, two hundred to 1000 ng genomic DNA is added to a reaction mix containing 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 0.1 mg/ml gelatin, 200 μM each dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP, 0.5 μM each forward and reverse DNA primers, 20% glycerol, and 2.5 units Taq DNA polymerase. The reaction is run in a thermal cycling machine as follows: 3 minutes at 94° C., 39 repeats of the cycle 1 minute at 94° C., 1 minute at 50° C., 30 seconds at 72° C., followed by 5 minutes at 72° C. Twenty μl of each reaction mix is run on a 3.5% NuSieve gel in TBE buffer (90 mM Tris-borate, 2 mM EDTA) at 50V for two to four hours. Using this procedure, for example, one may detect the presence of the uidA gene. Primers for the maize F16BP aldolase promoter can be readily prepared by one of skill in the art in light of the sequence given in SEQ ID NO:2.
A method to detect the presence of phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT) involves the use of an in vitro enzyme reaction followed by thin layer chromatography, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,990,890 (specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). The procedure is conducted by preparing various protein extracts from homogenates of potentially transformed cells, and from control cells that have neither been transformed nor exposed to bialaphos selection, and then assaying by incubation with PPT and 14C-Acetyl Coenzyme A followed by thin layer chromatography. The results of this assay provide confirmation of the expression of the bar gene which codes for phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT).
For Southern blot analysis genomic DNA is digested with a 3-fold excess of restriction enzymes, electrophoresed through 0.8% agarose (FMC), and transferred (Southern, 1975) to Nytran using 10×SCP (20×SCP: 2 M NaCl, 0.6 M disodium phosphate, 0.02 M disodium EDTA). Probes are labeled with 32P using the random priming method (Boehringer Mannheim) and purified using Quik-Sep® spin columns (Isolab Inc., Akron, Ohio). Filters are prehybridized at 65° C. in 6×SCP, 10% dextran sulfate, 2% sarcosine, and 500 μg/ml heparin (Chomet et al., 1987) for 15 min. Filters then are hybridized overnight at 65° C. in 6×SCP containing 100 μg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA and 32P-labeled probe. Filters are washed in 2×SCP, 1% SDS at 65° C. for 30 min. and visualized by autoradiography using Kodak XAR5 film. For rehybridization, the filters are boiled for 10 min. in distilled H2O to remove the first probe and then prehybridized as described above.
Example 12 
Utilization of Transgenic Crops
The ultimate goal in plant transformation is to produce plants which are useful to man. In this respect, transgenic plants created in accordance with the current invention may be used for virtually any purpose deemed of value to the grower or to the consumer. For example, one may wish to harvest seed from transgenic plants. This seed may in turn be used for a wide variety of purposes. The seed may be sold to farmers for planting in the field or may be directly used as food, either for animals or humans. Alternatively, products may be made from the seed itself. Examples of products which may be made from the seed include, oil, starch, animal or human food, pharmaceuticals, and various industrial products. The food uses of maize, in addition to human consumption of maize kernels, include both products of dry- and wet-milling industries. The principal products of maize dry milling are grits, meal and flour. The maize wet-milling industry can provide maize starch, maize syrups, and dextrose for food use. Maize oil is recovered from maize germ, which is a by-product of both dry- and wet-milling industries.
Maize, including both grain and non-grain portions of the plant, also is used extensively as livestock feed, primarily for beef cattle, dairy cattle, hogs, and poultry. Industrial uses of maize include production of ethanol, maize starch in the wet-milling industry and maize flour in the dry-milling industry. The industrial applications of maize starch and flour are based on functional properties, such as viscosity, film formation, adhesive properties, and ability to suspend particles. The maize starch and flour have application in the paper and textile industries. Other industrial uses include applications in adhesives, building materials, foundry binders, laundry starches, explosives, oil-well muds, and other mining applications. Plant parts other than the grain of maize also are used in industry, for example, stalks and husks are made into paper and wallboard and cobs are used for fuel and to make charcoal. Other means for utilizing plants, such as those that may be made with the current invention, have been well known since the dawn of agriculture and will be known to those of skill in the art in light of the instant disclosure. Specific methods for crop utilization may be found in, for example, Sprague and Dudley (1988), and Watson and Ramstad (1987).
REFERENCES
The references listed below are incorporated herein by reference to the extent that they supplement, explain, provide a background for, or teach methodology, techniques, and/or compositions employed herein.

    U.S. Pat. No. 4,237,224
    U.S. Pat. No. 4,535,060
    U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,317
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,001,060
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,134,074
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,188,642
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,268,526
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,302,523
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,322,783
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,354,855
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,253
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,464,765
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,489,520
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,500,365
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,508,184
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,508,468
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,510,471
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,527,695
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,877
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,880
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,545,818
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,318
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,055
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,324
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,616
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,610,042
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,625,047
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,627,061
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,633,448
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,876
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,658,772
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,689,052
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,728,925
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,708
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,709
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,831,011
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,981,840
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,990,390
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,990,890
    U.S. Pat. No. 6,153,811
    EP 0 154 204
    EP 0 672 752
    PCT Publication WO 92/17598
    PCT Publication WO 95/06128
    PCT Publication WO 97/04103
    PCT Publication WO 96/04392
    PCT Publication WO 97/26366
    PCT Publication WO 97/41228
    PCT Publication WO 98/26064
    PCT Publication WO 99/58659
    PCT Publication WO 00/70066
    PCT Publication WO 00/70067
    Abdullah et al., Biotechnology, 4:1087, 1986.
    Abel et al., Science, 232:738–743, 1986.
    Albert et al., Plant J., 7(4):649–659, 1995.
    An et al., Plant Molecular Biology Manual A3:1–19, 1998.
    Anderson and Levin, Plant Physiol., 46:819–820, 1970.
    Araki et al., J. Mol. Biol. 225(1):25–37, 1992.
    Armaleo et al., Curr. Genet. 17(2):97–103, 1990.
    Armstrong et al., Maize Genetics Coop Newsletter, 65:92–93, 1991.
    Bansal et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89:3654–3658, 1992.
    Barkai-Golan et al., Arch. Microbiol., 116:119–124, 1978.
    Bates, Mol. Biotechnol., 2(2):135–145, 1994.
    Battraw and Hall, Theor. App. Genet., 82(2):161–168, 1991.
    Belanger and Kriz, Genet., 129:863–872, 1991.
    Bellus, J. Macromol. Sci. Pure Appl. Chem., 1(1):1355–1376, 1994.
    Bernal-Lugo and Leopold, Plant Physiol., 98:1207–1210, 1992.
    Berzal-Herranz et al., Genes and Devel., 6:129–134, 1992.
    Bevan et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 11(2):369–385, 1983.
    Bhattacharjee et al., J. Plant Bioch. and Biotech. 6, (2):69–73. 1997.
    Blackman et al., Plant Physiol., 100:225–230, 1992.
    Bol et al., Annu. Rev. Phytopath., 28:113–138, 1990.
    Bottjer et al., Experimental Parasitology, 60:239–244, 1985.
    Bouchez et al., EMBO Journal, 8(13):4197–4204, 1989.
    Bower et al., The Plant Journal, 2:409–416. 1992.
    Bowler et al., Ann Rev. Plant Physiol., 43:83–116, 1992.
    Branson and Guss, Proceedings North Central Branch Entomological Society of America, 27:91–95, 1972.
    Broakaert et al., Science, 245:1100–1102, 1989.
    Buchanan-Wollaston et al., Plant Cell Reports 11:627–631. 1992
    Buising and Benbow, Mol Gen Genet, 243(1):71–81. 1994.
    Callis et al., Genes Dev., 1:1183–1200, 1987.
    Campbell (ed.), In: Avermectin and Abamectin, 1989.
    Capaldi et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 74(2):425–433, 1977.
    Carpenter et al., Plant Cell, 4(5):557–571, 1992.
    Casa et al., Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA, 90(23):11212–11216, 1993.
    Cashmore et al., Gen. Eng. of Plants, Plenum Press, New York, 29–38, 1983.
    Cech et al., Cell, 27:487–496, 1981.
    Chandler et al., The Plant Cell, 1:1175–1183, 1989.
    Chau et al., Science, 244:174–181, 1989.
    Chen and Wu, Gene, 185:195–199, 1997.
    Chilton et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 71:3672–3676, 1974.
    Chomet et al., EMBO J., 6:295–302, 1987.
    Chopra et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 15:517–520, 1990.
    Chowrira et al., J Biol. Chem., 268:19458–62, 1993.
    Chowrira et al., J. Biol. Chem., 269:25856–25864, 1994.
    Christou et al., Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA, 84(12):3962–3966, 1987.
    Chu et al., Scientia Sinica, 18:659–668, 1975.
    Clark, J. Plant Nutrition, 5(8):1039–1057, 1982.
    Coe et al., In: Corn and Corn Improvement, 81–258, 1988.
    Comai et al., Nature, 317:741–744, 1985.
    Conkling et al., Plant Physiol., 93:1203–1211, 1990.
    Cordero et al., Plant J., 6(2):141–150, 1994.
    Coxson et al., Biotropica, 24:121–133, 1992.
    Cuozzo et al., Bio/Technology, 6:549–553, 1988.
    Cutler et al., J. Plant Physiol., 135:351–354, 1989.
    Czapla and Lang, J. Econ. Entomol., 83:2480–2485, 1990.
    Davies et al., Plant Physiol., 93:588–595, 1990.
    De Block et al., The EMBO Journal, 6(9):2513–2518, 1987.
    De Block et al., Plant Physiol., 91:694–701, 1989.
    Dellaporta et al., In: Chromosome Structure and Function: Impact of New Concepts, 18th Stadler Genetics Symposium, 11:263–282, 1988.
    Dennis et al., Nucl. Acids Res., 12(9):3983–4000, 1984.
    Dennis et al., J. Mol. Biol., 202:759–767, 1988.
    Depicker et al., Plant Cell Reports, 7:63–66, 1988.
    Dhaese et al., EMBO Journal, 2(3):419–426, 1983.
    D'Halluin et al., Plant Cell, 4(12):1495–1505, 1992.
    Ditta et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 77:7374–7351, 1980.
    Dure et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 12:475–486, 1989.
    Ebert et al., Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA, 84:5745–5749, 1987.
    Ehrenshaft et al., Current Genetics, 34(6):478–485, 1999.
    Ellis et al., EMBO Journal, 6(11):3203–3208, 1987.
    Enomoto, et al., J. Bacteriol, 6(2):663–668, 1983.
    Erdmann et al., Mol. Jour. Gen. Micro., 138:363–368, 1992.
    Feinberg and Vogelstein, Anal. Biochem., 132:6–13, 1983.
    Finkle et al., Plant Sci., 42:133–140, 1985.
    Fitzpatrick, Gen. Engineering News, 22:7, 1993.
    Forster and Symons, Cell, 49:211–220, 1987.
    Fraley et al., Bio/Technology, 3:629–635.
    Franken et al., EMBO J., 10(9):2605–2612, 1991.
    Fransz et al., Plant Cell Reports, 8:67–70, 1989.
    Fromm et al., Nature 319:791–793, 1986
    Gal et al., EMBO J., 10:1571–1578, 1991.
    Gasperini and Pupillo, Plant Science Letters, 28:163–171, 1982/3.
    Gatehouse et al., J. Sci. Food. Agric., 35:373–380, 1984.
    Gelvin et al., In: Plant Molecular Biology Manual, 1990.
    Gerlach et al., Nature 328:802–805, 1987.
    Ghosh-Biswas et al., J. Biotechnol., 32(1):1–10, 1994.
    Golic and Lindquist, Cell, 59:3, 499–509. 1989.
    Goring et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88:1770–1774, 1991.
    Graham et al., Mol. Cell. Biol., 2:1044–1051, 1986.
    Gross et al., Plant Physiol., 105:1393–1398, 1994.
    Guerrero et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 15:11–26, 1990.
    Gupta et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:1629–1633, 1993.
    Haake et al., Plant Journal, 14(2):147–157, 1998.
    Haake et al., Plant Journal, 17(5):479–489, 1999.
    Hagio et al., Plant Cell Rep., 10(5):260–264, 1991.
    Hamilton et al., pi Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93(18):9975–9979, 1996.
    Hammock et al., Nature, 344:458–461, 1990.
    Haseloff and Gerlach, Nature, 334:585–591, 1988.
    Haseloff et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94(6):2122–2127, 1997.
    He et al., Plant Cell Reports, 14 (2–3):192–196, 1994.
    Hemenway et al., The EMBO J., 7:1273–1280, 1988.
    Hensgens et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 22(6):1101–1127, 1993.
    Hidaka et al., Nuc. Acids Res., 18(13):3991, 1990.
    Hiei et al., Plant. Mol. Biol., 35(1–2):205–218, 1997.
    Hilder et al., Nature, 330:160–163, 1987.
    Hinchee et al., Bio/technol, 6:915–922, 1988.
    Holmberg et al., Nature Biotechnology, 15(3):244–247, 1997.
    Hou and Lin, Plant Physiology, 111(2 Supp.):166, 1996.
    Hudspeth and Grula, Plant Mol. Biol., 12:579–589, 1989.
    Ikeda et al., J. Bacteriol., 169:5615–5621, 1987.
    Ikuta et al., Bio/technol., 8:241–242, 1990.
    Ishida et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 14(6):745–750, 1996.
    Jelesko et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96:10302–10307, 1999.
    Jefferson et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83(22):8447–8451, 1986.
    Jefferson, Plant Mol. Biol. Rep., 5:387–405, 1987.
    Johnson et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86:9871–9875, 1989.
    Joshi, Nucleic Acids Res., 15:6643–6653, 1987.
    Joyce, Nature, 338:217–244, 1989.
    Kaasen et al., J. Bacteriology, 174:889–898, 1992.
    Kaeppler et al., Plant Cell Reports 9: 415–418, 1990.
    Kaeppler et al., Theor. Appl. Genet., 84(5–6):560–566, 1992.
    Karsten et al., Botanica Marina, 35:11–19, 1992.
    Katz et al., J. Gen. Microbiol., 129:2703–2714, 1983.
    Kayaga et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 248:668–674, 1995.
    Keller et al., EMBO J., 8(5):1309–1314, 1989.
    Kelley and Tolan, Plant Physiol., 82:1076–1080, 1986.
    Kim and Cech, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84:8788–8792, 1987.
    Klee et al., Bio-Technology, 3(7):637–642, 1985.
    Knittel et al., Plant Cell Reports, 14(2–3):81–86, 1994.
    Kohler et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 29(6):1293–1298, 1995.
    Koncz et al., Mol. Gen. Gen., 204:383–396, 1986.
    Koster and Leopold, Plant Physiol., 88:829–832, 1988.
    Kriz et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 207(1):90–98, 1987.
    Kruger and Schnarrenberger, Eur. J. Biochem., 136:101–106, 1983.
    Kunkel et al., Methods Enzymol, 154:367–382, 1987.
    Langridge and Feix, Cell, 34:1015–1022, 1983.
    Langridge et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86:3219–3223, 1989.
    Laufs et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 87(19):7752–7756, 1990.
    Lawton et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 9:315–324, 1987.
    Lazzeri, Methods Mol. Biol., 49:95–106, 1995.
    Lebherz et al., J. of Biol. Chem., 259(2):1011–1017, 1984.
    Lee and Saier, J. of Bacteriol., 153(2):685–692, 1983.
    Lee et al., Korean J. Genet., 11(2):65–72, 1989.
    Levings, Science, 250:942–947, 1990.
    Lieber and Strauss, Mol. Cell. Biol., 15: 540–551, 1995.
    Lindstrom et al., Developmental Genetics, 11:160–167, 1990.
    Loomis et al., J. Expt. Zoology, 252:9–15, 1989.
    Lorz et al., Mol Gen Genet, 199:178–182, 1985.
    Lyznik et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 24(19):3784–3789, 1996.
    Ma et al., Nature, 334:631–633, 1988.
    Maeser et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 230(1–2):170–176, 1991.
    Marcotte et al., Nature, 335:454–457, 1988.
    Mariani et al., Nature, 347:737–741, 1990.
    Marsh and Lebherz, Trends Biochem. Sci., 17:110–113, 1992.
    Martinez et al., J. Mol. Biol., 208(4):551–565, 1989.
    McCabe and Martinell, Bio-Technology, 11(5):596–598, 1993.
    McCormac et al., Euphytica, 1:17–25, 1998.
    McElroy et al., Plant Cell, 2:163–171, 1990.
    Michel and Westhof, J. Mol. Biol., 216:585–610, 1990.
    Mundy and Chua, The EMBO J., 7:2279–2286, 1988.
    Murakami et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 205:42–50, 1986.
    Murashige and Skoog, Physiol. Plant., 15:473–497, 1962.
    Murdock et al., Phytochemistry, 29:85–89, 1990.
    Nagatani et al., Biotech. Tech., 11(7):471–473, 1997.
    Nakamura et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 30:381–385, 1996.
    Nakamura et al., Biosci. Biotech. Biochem., 61(2):256–262, 1997.
    Napoli et al., Plant Cell, 2:279–289, 1990.
    Odell et al., Nature, 313:810–812, 1985.
    Ogawa et al., Sci. Rep., 13:42–48, 1973.
    Omirulleh et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 21(3):415–428, 1993.
    Ow et al., Science, 234:856–859, 1986.
    Palukaitis et al., Virology, 99:145–151, 1979.
    Paszkowski et al., EMBO J., 3:2717–2722, 1984.
    Pearce et al., Science, 253:895–898, 1991.
    Pelzer-Reith et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 21:331–340, 1993.
    Perlak et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88:3324–3328, 1991.
    Perriman et al., Gene, 113:157–163, 1992.
    Peterhans et al., EMBO J., 9(11):3437–3445, 1990.
    Phi-Van et al., Mol. Cell. Biol., 10:2302–2307, 1990.
    Piatkowski et al., Plant Physiol., 94:1682–1688, 1990.
    Potrykus et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 199:183–188, 1985.
    Poulsen et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 205(2):193–200, 1986.
    Prasher et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 126(3):1259–1268, 1985.
    Prody et al., Science, 231:1577–1580, 1986.
    Quigley et al., J. Mol. Evol., 29(5):412–421, 1989.
    Ralston et al., Genet., 119(1):185–197, 1988.
    Reed et al., J. Gen. Microbiology, 130:1–4, 1984.
    Reichel et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93(12):5888–5893, 1996.
    Reina et al., Nucl. Acids Res., 18(21):6426, 1990.
    Reinhold-Hurek and Shub, Nature, 357:173–176, 1992.
    Rensburg et al., J. Plant Physiol., 141:188–194, 1993.
    Rhodes et al., Methods Mol. Biol., 55:121–131, 1995.
    Ritala et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 24(2):317–325, 1994.
    Rochester, Winer, Shah, EMBO J., 5:451–458, 1986.
    Rogers et al., Methods Enzymol., 153:253–277, 1987.
    Rogers et al., Plant Molecular Biology Manual A2:1–12, 1988.
    Rutter, Fed. Proc. 23:1248–1257, 1964.
    Sambrook, Fritsch, and Maniatis, In Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1989.
    Sarkar et al., PCR Methods Appl., 2:318–322, 1993.
    Sauer, Mol. and Cell. Biol., 7:2087–2096, 1987.
    Schaeffer et al., Phytochemistry, 46(8):1335–1338, 1997.
    Schwob et al., Plant J., 4(3):423–432, 1993.
    Shagan and Bar-Zvi, Plant Physiol., 101:1397–1398, 1993.
    Shapiro, In: Mobile Genetic Elements, 1983.
    Sheen et al., Plant Journal, 8(5):777–784, 1995.
    Shure et al., Cell, 35:225–233, 1983.
    Simpson, Science, 233:34–38, 1986.
    Singsit et al., Transgenic Res., 6(2):169–176, 1997.
    Smith et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 224:447–481, 1990.
    Southern, J. Mol. Biol., 98:503–517, 1975.
    Spencer et al., Plant Molecular Biology, 18:201–210, 1992.
    Sprague and Dudley, eds., Corn and Improvement, 3rd ed., 1988.
    Stalker et al., Science, 242:419–422, 1988.
    Stief et al., Nature 341:343–345, 1989.
    Stiefel et al., Plant Cell, 2(8):785–793, 1990.
    Sullivan, et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 215(3):431–440, 1989.
    Sutcliffe, pi Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 75:3737–3741, 1978.
    Swoboda et al., Mol. Gen. Gen., 237:33–40, 1993.
    Swoboda et al., EMBO J., 13:484–489, 1994.
    Symons, Nucl. Acids Res., 9(23):6527–6537, 1981.
    Symons, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 61:641–671, 1992.
    Szostak et al., Cell, 33:25–35, 1983.
    Tanksley et al., Bio/Technology, 7:257–264, 1989.
    Tarczynski et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89:1–5, 1992.
    Tarczynski et al., Science, 259:508–510, 1993.
    Taylor, Plant Cell, 1:259–264, 1989.
    Thillet et al., J. Biol. Chem., 263:12500–12508, 1988.
    Thompson et al., The EMBO Journal, 6(9):2519–2523, 1987.
    Thompson et al., Euphytica, 85(1–3):75–80, 1995.
    Tian et al., Plant Cell Rep., 16:267–271, 1997.
    Timmermans et al., J. Biotechnol., 14:333–344, 1990.
    Tingay et al., The Plant Journal, 11(6):1369–1376, 1997.
    Tinland et al., EMBO J., 14(14):3585–3595, 1995.
    Tomes et al., Plant. Mol. Biol. 14(2):261–268, 1990.
    Tomic et al., Nucl. Acids Res., 18:1656, 1990.
    Torbet et al., Crop Science, 38(1):226–231, 1998.
    Torbet et al., Plant Cell Reports, 14(10):635–640, 1995.
    Toriyama et al., Theor Appl. Genet., 73:16, 1986.
    Tsukada et al., Plant Cell Physiol., 30(4):599–604, 1989.
    Tsutsumi et al., Gene, 141:215–220, 1994.
    Twell et al., Plant Physiol., 91:1270–1274, 1989.
    Tyagi and Kramer, Nature Biotech., 14:303–308, 1996.
    Uchimiya et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 204:204–207, 1986.
    Ugaki et al., Nucl. Acid Res., 19:371–377, 1991.
    Umeda and Uchimiya, Plant Physiol., 106:1015–1022, 1994.
    Upender et al., Biotechniques 18(1):29–30, 1995.
    Uribe et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 37(6):1069–1078, 1998.
    Van der Krol et al., Plant Cell, 2:291–299, 1990.
    Van Eck et al., Plant Cell Reports, 14(5):299–304, 1995.
    Van Tunen et al., EMBO J., 7(5):1257–1263, 1988.
    Vasil et al., Plant Physiol., 91:1575–1579, 1989.
    Vernon and Bohnert, The EMBO J., 11:2077–2085, 1992.
    Vodkin et al., Cell, 34:1023–31, 1983.
    Vogel et al., J. Cell. Biochem., (Suppl. 0) 13:Part D, 1989.
    Walker et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84:6624–6628, 1987.
    Wandelt and Feix, Nucl. Acids Res., 17(6):2354, 1989.
    Wang et al., Molecular and Cellular Biology, 12(8):3399–3406, 1992.
    Watrud et al., In: Engineered Organisms and the Environment, 1985.
    Watson and Ramstad, eds., Corn: Chemistry and Technology, 1987.
    Weber et al., BioTechniques, 25(3):415–419, 1988.
    Wen-jun and Forde, Nucl. Acids. Res. 17:8385, 1989.
    Wenzler et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 12:41–50, 1989.
    Withers and King, Plant Physiol., 64:675–678, 1979.
    Wolter et al., The EMBO J., 11(13):4685–4692, 1992.
    Xiang and Guerra, Plant Physiol., 102:287–293, 1993.
    Xu et al., Plant Physiol., 110:249–257, 1996.
    Yamada et al., Plant Cell Rep., 4:85–88, 1986.
    Yamaguchi-Shinozaki et al., Plant Cell Physiol., 33:217–224, 1992.
    Yang and Russell, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87:4144–4148, 1990.
    Yuan and Altman, Science, 263:1269–1273, 1994.
    Yuan et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89:8006–8010, 1992.
    Zhang et a., The Plant Cell, 3:1155–1165, 1991.
    Zhang et al., Mol. Biotechnology, 8:223–231, 1997.
    Zheng and Edwards, J. Gen. Virol., 71:1865–1868, 1990.
    Zhou et al., Plant Cell Reports, 12(11):612–616, 1993.
    Zubko et al., Nature Biotech., 18:442–445, 2000.
    Zukowsky et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80:1101–1105, 1983.


All of the compositions and methods disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While the compositions and methods of this invention have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations may be applied to the compositions and methods and in the steps or in the sequence of steps of the methods described herein without departing from the concept, spirit and scope of the invention. More specifically, it will be apparent that certain agents which are both chemically and physiologically related may be substituted for the agents described herein while the same or similar results would be achieved. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

## Claims

1. An isolated nucleic acid comprising a maize chioroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, said promoter comprising from 95 to 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

2. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 1, wherein said chloroplastic F 16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 110 to about 1864 contigous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

3. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 1, wherein said chloroplastic F1I6BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 125 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

4. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 1, wherein said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 250 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

5. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 1, wherein said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 400 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

6. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 1, wherein said chloroplastic F 1 6BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 750 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

7. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 1, wherein said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 1000 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

8. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 1, wherein said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 1500 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

9. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 1, wherein said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 1750 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

10. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 1, wherein said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

11. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 1, further comprising a terminator.

12. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 11, wherein said terminator comprises a NOS terminator.

13. A transgenic plant stably transformed with a selected DNA comprising a maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, said promoter comprising from 95 to 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

14. The transgenic plant of claim 13, wherein said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 110 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

15. The transgenic plant of claim 13, wherein said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 125 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

16. The transgenic plant of claim 13, wherein said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 250 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

17. The transgenic plant of claim 13, wherein said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 400 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

18. The transgenic plant of claim 13, wherein said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 750 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

19. The transgenic plant of claim 13, wherein said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 1000 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

20. The transgenic plant of claim 13, wherein said chloroplastic F 16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 1500 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

21. The transgenic plant of claim 13, wherein said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 1750 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

22. The transgenic plant of claim 13, wherein said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

23. The transgenic plant of claim 13, wherein said selected DNA further comprises a selected heterologous coding region operably linked to said chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter.

24. The transgenic plant of claim 23, wherein said selected heterologous coding region encodes a protein imparting insect resistance, bacterial disease resistance, fungal disease resistance, viral disease resistance, nematode disease resistance, herbicide resistance, enhanced grain composition or quality, enhanced nutrient utilization, enhanced environment or stress resistance, reduced mycotoxin contamination, male sterility, a selectable marker phenotype, a screenable marker phenotype, a negative selectable marker phenotype, or altered plant agronomic characteristics.

25. The transgenic plant of claim 24, wherein said selected heterologous coding region encodes a protein imparting a selectable marker phenotype, wherein said protein is selected from the group consisting of phosphinothricin acetyltransferase, glyphosate resistant EPSPS, aminoglycoside phosphotransferase, hygromycin phosphotransferase, neomycin phosphotransferase, dalapon dehalogenase, bromoxynil resistant nitrilase, anthranilate synthase and glyphosate oxidoreductase.

26. The transgenic plant of claim 23, wherein said selected heterologous coding region is operably linked to a terminator.

27. The transgenic plant of claim 26, wherein said terminator is a NOS terminator.

28. The transgenic plant of claim 13, wherein said selected DNA comprises plasmid DNA.

29. The transgenic plant of claim 13, further defined as a monocotyledonous plant.

30. The transgenic plant of claim 29, wherein said monocotyledonous plant is selected from the group consisting of wheat, maize, rye, rice, oat, barley, turfgrass, sorghum, millet and sugarcane.

31. The transgenic plant of claim 30, wherein the monocotyledonous plant is maize.

32. The transgenic plant of claim 13, further defined as a dicotyledonous plant.

33. The transgenic plant of claim 32, wherein said dicotyledonous plant is selected from the group consisting of tobacco, tomato, potato, soybean, cotton, canola, alfalfa, sunflower, and cotton.

34. The transgenic plant of claim 33, wherein said dicotyledonous plant is a soybean plant.

35. The transgenic plant of claim 13, further defined as a fertile R0 transgenic plant.

36. A seed of the fertile R0 transgenic plant of claim 35, wherein said seed comprises said selected DNA.

37. The transgenic plant of claim 13, further defined as a progeny plant of any generation of a fertile R0 transgenic plant, wherein said progeny plant comprises said selected DNA.

38. A seed of the progeny plant of claim 37, wherein said seed comprises said selected DNA.

39. A transgenic plant cell stably transformed with a selected DNA comprising a maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, wherein said maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from 95 to 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

40. The transgenic plant cell of claim 39, wherein said maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 110 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

41. The transgenic plant cell of claim 39, wherein said maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 125 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

42. The transgenic plant cell of claim 39, wherein said maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 200 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

43. The transgenic plant cell of claim 39, wherein said maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 400 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

44. The transgenic plant cell of claim 39, wherein said maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 750 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

45. The transgenic plant cell of claim 39, wherein said maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 1000 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

46. The transgenic plant cell of claim 39, wherein said maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 1500 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

47. The transgenic plant cell of claim 39, wherein said maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from about 1750 to about 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

48. The transgenic plant cell of claim 39, wherein said maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2.

49. The transgenic plant cell of claim 39, wherein said selected DNA further comprises a selected coding region operably linked to said maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter.

50. The transgenic plant cell of claim 49, wherein said selected coding region encodes a protein imparting insect resistance, bacterial disease resistance, fungal disease resistance, viral disease resistance, nematode disease resistance, herbicide resistance, enhanced grain composition or quality, enhanced nutrient utilization, enhanced environment or stress resistance, reduced mycotoxin contamination, male sterility, a selectable marker phenotype, a screenable marker phenotype, a negative selectable marker phenotype, or altered plant agronomic characteristics.

51. The transgenic plant cell of claim 50, wherein said selected protein imparts a selectable marker phenotype, wherein said protein is selected from the group consisting of phosphinothricin acetyltransferase, glyphosate resistant EPSPS, aminoglycoside phosphotransferase, hygromycin phosphotransferase, neomycin phosphotransferase, dalapon dehalogenase, bromoxynil resistant nitrilase, anthranilate synthase and glyphosate oxidoreductase.

52. The transgenic plant cell of claim 49, wherein said selected coding region is operably linked to a terminator.

53. The transgenic plant cell of claim 52, wherein said terminator is a NOS terminator.

54. The transgenic plant cell of claim 39, wherein said selected DNA comprises plasmid DNA.

55. The transgenic plant cell of claim 39, fuirther defined as a monocotyledonous plant.

56. The transgenic plant cell of claim 55, wherein said monocotyledonous plant is selected from the group consisting of wheat, maize, rye, rice, oat, barley, turfgrass, sorghum, millet and sugarcane.

57. The transgenic plant cell of claim 56, wherein said monocotyledonous plant is a maize plant.

58. The transgenic plant cell of claim 39, further defined as a dicotyledonous plant.

59. The transgenic plant cell of claim 58, wherein said dicotyledonous plant is selected from the group consisting of tobacco, tomato, potato, soybean, cotton, canola, alfalfa and sunflower.

60. The transgenic plant cell of claim 59, wherein said dicotyledonous plant is a soybean plant.

61. A method of preparing a transgenic plant comprising the steps of:
(i) obtaining a construct comprising a maize chioroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter, wherein said maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter comprises from 95 to 1864 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2;
(ii) transforming a recipient plant cell with said construct; and
(iii) regenerating said recipient plant cell to obtain a transgenic plant transformed with said construct.

62. The method of claim 61, wherein said maize chloroplastic F16BP aldolase promoter is operably linked to a selected coding region.

63. The method of claim 61, wherein said transgenic plant is fertile.

64. The method of claim 63, further comprising the step of obtaining seed from said fertile transgenic plant, wherein said seed comprise said construct.

65. The method of claim 64, further comprising obtaining a progeny plant of any generation from said fertile transgenic plant, wherein said progeny comprise said construct.

66. The method of claim 61, wherein said step of transforming comprises a method selected from the group consisting of microprojectile bombardment, PEG mediated transformation of protoplasts, electroporation, silicon carbide fiber mediated transformation, or Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.

67. The method of claim 66, wherein said step of transforming comprises microprojectile bombardment.

68. The method of claim 61, wherein said recipient plant cell is from a monocotyledonous plant.

69. The method of claim 68, wherein said monocotyledonous plant is selected from the group consisting of wheat, maize, rye, rice, turfgrass, oat, barley, sorghum, millet, and sugarcane.

70. The method of claim 69, wherein the monocotyledonous plant is a maize plant.

71. The method of claim 61, wherein said recipient plant cell is from a dicotyledonous plant.

72. The method of claim 71, wherein said dicotyledonous plant is selected from the group consisting of tobacco, tomato, potato, soybean, canola, sunflower, alfalfa and cotton.

73. The method of claim 62, wherein said selected coding region encodes a protein imparting insect resistance, bacterial disease resistance, fungal disease resistance, viral disease resistance, nematode disease resistance, herbicide resistance, enhanced grain composition or quality, enhanced nutrient utilization, enhanced environment or stress resistance, reduced mycotoxin contamination, male sterility, a selectable marker phenotype, a screenable marker phenotype, a negative selectable marker phenotype, or altered plant agronomic characteristics.

74. The method of claim 62, wherein said selected coding region is operably linked to a terminator.

75. The method of claim 74, wherein said terminator is a NOS terminator.