alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

         The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Orion
HealthCorp, Inc. (the "small business issuer"), hereby certifies as follows:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer (the
"Report"), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the small
business issuer.

Dated this 9th day of August, 2007.

/s/ Terrence L. Bauer
----------------------------------------------
 Terrence L. Bauer, Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the small business issuer and
will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2603 

To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to allow access 

to certain business records only if an investigation relates to a specific 

individual or specific group of individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2013 

Mr. ROSS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Select Committee on Intelligence 

(Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 

to allow access to certain business records only if an 

investigation relates to a specific individual or specific 

group of individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Relevancy Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2603 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ACCESS TO CERTAIN BUSINESS 

2 RECORDS UNDER THE FOREIGN INTEL3 LIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 1978 TO IN4 VESTIGATIONS OF SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS OR 

5 GROUPS OF INDIVIDUALS. 

6 Section 501(a) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveil7 lance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1861(a)) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘for an inves9 tigation’’ and inserting ‘‘related to a specific person 

10 that is the subject of an investigation’’; and 

11 (2) in paragraph (2)— 

12 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘; 

13 and’’ and inserting a semicolon; 

14 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the 

15 period and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

16 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

17 subparagraph: 

18 ‘‘(C) be conducted of a specific person or spe19 cific group of persons.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[108th Congress Public Law 379]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ379.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 2209]]

Public Law 108-379
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to remove the requirement that 
   processors be members of an agency administering a marketing order 
      applicable to pears. <<NOTE: Oct. 30, 2004 -  [H.R. 2984]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PEAR MARKETING ORDERS.

    Section 8c(7)(C) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 
608c(7)(C)), reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing 
Agreement Act of 1937, is amended in the last sentence--
            (1) by striking ``or pears''; and
            (2) by striking ``: Provided,'' and all that follows through 
        ``be equal''.

    Approved October 30, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2984:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Oct. 5, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 11, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 30, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136299 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

GAYNELL MCINTYRE, Personal Representative Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. of the Estate of LORENE PENDLEY, Deceased, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136299 

 COA: 274462 
 Bay CC: 04-003784-NH

KOCHUNNIK MOHAN, MD, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

SUBBA CHAVALI, MD, 

Defendant.
 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

1215 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 30, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp., (the Corporation) each certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



| |                       
| | ----------------------
| | /s/ Robert Escobio    
| | Robert Escobio        
| | Chief Executive Office

August 12, 2008



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Fernando Fussa     
| | Fernando Fussa         
| | Chief Financial Officer

August 12, 2008



This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason other than as specifically required by law.
Followup Completed Gormas. Michael 

### (OSn

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: ' Attachments:

Follow Up Flag: Flag Status:

Hello everyone, Faulk,Scott (OST) Tuesday,April29, 20149:0SAM 'Icooper.hu

ronairport@midconetwork.com';'Mayor@H uronSD .co.l]1' Gormas,Michael(OST);

Schlemmer,Kevin(OST);

Martin,Michae~OST), EAS Proposalsto ServeHuron,SD ;;;: , 0' '-,' BoutiqueAir.pdf;GreatLakes.pdf -<: 

## r.;~~~,~ I -:.:;,-r1=-J .....J vO,;~

fTl::OfTl ::o~z >::"':--f -1- ,00 ~~::;.;.-:;-"


# ~-- co

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Huron, SD, as well as give you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.

By Order 2014-3-16, issued on March 28, 2014, the Department requesting proposals from air carriers interested in providing EAS for a new term. In response to our request, Boutique Air and Great Lakes Aviation submitted a proposal.

I have attached each air carrier's proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime today. I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but no later than Thursday, May 29. Please send your comments directly to michael.gormas@dot.gov_ Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution list.

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Scott Faulk Transportation Industry Analyst U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-9721

1
4.2100 Scope of part.       This subpart implements paragraphs (a)(1)(A) and (a)(1)(B) of section 889 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 4.21 Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2434 

To require the Director of National Intelligence to conduct a study on the 

use of contractors for intelligence activities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2013 

Ms. JACKSON LEE (for herself, Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr. LEWIS, Mr. JOHNSON of 

Georgia, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. 

CUMMINGS, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. CASTRO of Texas, Ms. BASS, Mr. 

JEFFRIES, Ms. FUDGE, and Mr. CICILLINE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent 

Select) 

A BILL 

To require the Director of National Intelligence to conduct 

a study on the use of contractors for intelligence activities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Civilian Contractors 

5 Engaged in Intelligence Activities Reduction Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2434 IH

1 SEC. 2. DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE STUDY ON 

2 THE USE OF CONTRACTORS IN THE CONDUCT 

3 OF INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. 

4 (a) STUDY.—The Director of National Intelligence 

5 shall conduct a study to ascertain the extent to which con6 tractors are used in the conduct of intelligence activities 

7 and the type of information to which such contractors are 

8 exposed or have access. 

9 (b) REPORT.—Not later than December 31, 2013, 

10 the Director of Intelligence shall submit to Congress a re11 port containing— 

12 (1) the results of the study conducted under 

13 subsection (a); and 

14 (2) a plan for reducing by 25 percent the num15 ber of contractors to the intelligence community with 

16 top secret security clearances that are engaged in in17 telligence activities (including intelligence analysis). 

18 (c) REDUCTION OF CONTRACTORS.—Not later than 

19 December 31, 2014, the Director of National Intelligence 

20 shall reduce the number of contractors to the intelligence 

21 community with top secret security clearances that are en22 gaged in intelligence activities (including intelligence anal23 ysis) as of the date of the enactment of this Act by 25 

24 percent. 

25 (d) INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DEFINED.—In this 

26 section, the term ‘‘intelligence community’’ has the meanVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:32 Jun 24, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2434.IH H2434

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2434 IH

1 ing given the term in section 3(4) of the National Security 

2 Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# L_2021365EN.01004601.xml

| 14.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 365/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 365/46

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1099 of 5 July 2021 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 238 of 6 July 2021
  )

On page 31, in the Annex, point (2), in the first column of the table:

for:

‘321’,

read:

‘322’.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Metal Management,
Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I,
Daniel W. Dienst, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Corporation, and I, Robert C. Larry, Executive Vice President,
Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, each certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



  /s/ Daniel W. Dienst
-------------------------------
Daniel W. Dienst
Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President
May 26, 2005



  /s/ Robert C. Larry
-------------------------------------
Robert C. Larry
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
May 26, 2005



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 4279.15 Exception authority.

The Administrator may, on a case-by-case basis, grant an exception to any requirement or provision of this subpart provided that such an exception is in the best financial interests of the Federal government. Exercise of this authority cannot be in conflict with applicable law.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Dolce Ventures Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  John  F.
Passalaqua,  Secretary/Treasurer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ John F. Passalaqua
John F. Passalaqua
Secretary/Treasurer, Dolce Ventures Inc.

July 26, 2005





                                  END OF FILING
#### Smith, Appellant, *v.*Walker, Warden, Appellee.

[Cite as *Smith v. Walker*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 431.]

*432(No. 98-1036

Submitted September 29, 1998

Decided October 28, 1998.)

*Paul Douglas Smith, pro se.*

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Karen L. Killian,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

Smith asserts in his sole proposition of law that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his petition based on the *in forma pauperis*requirements set forth in R.C. 2969.25 for inmates filing civil actions against a government entity or employee. Smith’s assertion lacks merit because even if the court of appeals’ rationale was incorrect, dismissal was warranted for the following reasons. See *State ex rel. The V Cos. v. Marshall*(1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 467, 474, 692 N.E.2d 198, 204, fn. 1.

First, Smith had adequate remedies at law by appeal or postconviction relief to review the alleged sentencing error. *State ex rel. Massie v. Rogers*(1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 449, 450, 674 N.E.2d 1383. Sentencing errors are not jurisdictional. *Majoros v. Collins*(1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 442, 443, 596 N.E.2d 1038, 1039.

Second, *res judicata*precluded Childers from filing successive habeas corpus petitions. *State ex rel. Brantley v. Ghee*(1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 287, 288, 685 N.E.2d 1243,1244.

Based on the foregoing, the court of appeals properly dismissed Smith’s petition. By so holding, as we have held in comparable cases, we need not *433address the issue of whether R.C. 2969.25 applies to habeas corpus actions. Cf. *State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 270, 271, 695 N.E.2d 254, 255; *State ex rel. Alford v. Winters*(1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 285, 286, 685 N.E.2d 1242, 1242-1243. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 3, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard A. RappaportRichard
      A. RappaportPrincipal
      Executive OfficerOctober
      23, 2009
§ 407.7 The contract. ( a ) The insurance contract shall become effective upon the acceptance by FCIC or the insurance provider of a complete, duly executed application for insurance on a form prescribed or approved by FCIC.
( b ) The contract shall consist of the accepted application, Area Risk Protection Insurance Basic Provisions, Crop Provisions, Special Provisions, Actuarial Documents, and any amendments, endorsements, or options thereto.
( c ) Changes made in the contract shall not affect its continuity from year to year.
( d ) No indemnity shall be paid unless the person complies with all terms and conditions of the contract.
( e ) The forms required under this part and by the contract are available at the office of the insurance provider, or such other location as specified by FCIC, if applicable.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Jurisdiction of
                Name                                                Incorporation
                ----                                               ---------------
<S>                                                                <C>
Mark VII Transportation Company, Inc.                              Delaware

   Subsidiaries of Mark VII Transportation Company, Inc.:

     Mark VII Trucking, Inc.                                       Delaware

     Apollo Express, Inc.                                          Kansas

     Neptune Trucking, Inc.                                        Kansas

     Jupiter Transportation, Inc.                                  Kansas

     Taurus Trucking, Inc.                                         Kansas

     Orion Express, Inc.                                           Kansas

       Subsidiary of Orion Express, Inc.:

         Mark VII Canada, ULC                                      Nova Scotia, Canada

     Union Team Leasing, Inc.                                      Kansas

Mark VII Risk Management, Inc.                                     Delaware

Mark VII Transportation Solutions, Inc.                            Missouri

Mark VII Logistics, S.A. de C.V.                                   Mexico

MNX Carriers, Inc.:                                                Delaware            .

   Subsidiary of MNX Carriers, Inc.:

     MNX Transport, Inc.                                           Missouri

       Subsidiary of MNX Transport, Inc.

         MNX Trucking, Inc.                                        Missouri

</TABLE>
Case 1:20-mj-00056-GRJ Document 1 Filed 07/21/20 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This financial data schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Company's year ended December 31, 1995 consolidated statement of income
(see Annual Report page 45) and the consolidated Balance Sheet (see Annual
Report page 44).  This information is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         123,768
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  124,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               260,700
<PP&E>                                          58,463
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,384,937<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          181,332
<BONDS>                                        673,020<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           308
<OTHER-SE>                                     485,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,384,937
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               698,462
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  443,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,192<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                117,690
<INCOME-TAX>                                    50,373
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             67,317
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.16
<FN>
<F1>Includes $1,037,280,000 of cost assigned to contracts acquired, net.
<F2>Includes $150,000,000 in Senior notes payable and $523,020,000 in
Subordinated notes payable.
<F3>Represents amortization of cost assigned to contracts acquired for FY '95.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>