CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

***TO BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICT AND RETURNED TO ARB ~

All rules submitted to the EPA as State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions must be supported by certain information

and documentation for the rule packages to be deemed complete for review by the EPA. Rules will not be evaluated

for approvability by the EPA unless the submittal packages are complete. To assist you in determining that all

necessary materials are included in rules packages sent the ARB for submittal to the EPA, please fill out the following

form and include it with the rule package you send ARB. See the ARB’s Guidelines on the Implementation of the EPA’s

Draft SIP Completeness Policy, October 1989, for a more detailed explanation than is provided here.

District South Coast AQMD Rule No. 1610 Date Amended May 9, 1997

Rule Title Old-Vehicle Scrapping

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

Not

Attached Attached N/A

(X) () () COMPLETE COPY OF THE RULE: Provide an unmarked copy of the entire

rule as adopted or amended by your District Board.

(X) () () UNDERLINE AND STRIKEOUT COPY OF THE RULE: If an amended rule,

provide a complete copy of the rule indicating in underline and strikeout

format all language which has been added, deleted, or changed since the rule

was last adopted or amended.

(X) () 0 COMPLETE COPY OF THE REFERENCED RULE(S): For any rule which

includes language specifically referencing another rule, a copy of that other

rule must also be submitted, unless it has already been submitted to EPA as

part of a previous SIP submittal.

(X) () () PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE: Include a copy of the local newspaper clipping

certification(s), stating the date of publication, which must be at least 30 days

before the hearing. As an alternative, include a copy of the actual published

notice of the public hearing as it appeared in the local newspaper(s). In this

case, however, enough of the newspaper page must be included to show the

date of publication. The notice must specifically identify by title and number

each rule adopted or amended.

(X) () () RESOLUTIONIMINUTE ORDER: Provide the Board Clerk certified resolution

or minute order. This document must include certification that the hearing

was held in accordance with the information in the public notice. It must also

list the rules that were adopted or amended, the date of the public hearing,

and a statement of compliance with California Health and Safety Code

Sections 40725-40728 (Administrative Procedures Act).

() () (X) PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES: Submit copies of written public

comments made during the notice period and at the public hearing. Also

submit any written responses prepared by the District staff or presented to the

District Board at the public hearing. A summary of the public comments and

responses is adequate. If there were no comments made during the notice

period or at the hearing, please indicate N/A to the left.
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

TECHNICAL MATERIALS

Not

Attached Attached NIA

(X) () () RULE EVALUATION FORM: See instructions for completing the Rule

Evaluation Form and the accompanying sample form.

() () (X) NON-EPA TEST METHOD: Include all test methods referenced in the rule,

but not previously submitted to EPA. Provide an explanation of the purpose

and principle for the test method and include the following supporting

technical data: describe the test details (number of tests to be carried out,

their precision accuracy, and repeatability); on a technical basis, compare the

method with the appropriate EPAIASTM method; explain the technical

differences of the two methods and how they affect monitoring of the

parameters of interest; explain how the test method affects the

implementation and enforcement of the applicable rule; explain the

advantages and any potential shortcomings of the test method.

(X) MODELING SUPPORT: Provide if appropriate; in general modeling support is

not required for VOC and NOx rules to determine their impacts on ozone

levels. Modeling is required where a rule is a relaxation that affects large

sources (~ 100 TPY) in an attainment area for SO2, directly emitted PMIO,

CO, or NOx (for NO2 purposes). In cases where EPA is concerned with the

impact on air quality of rule revisions which relax limits or cause a shift in

emission patterns in a nonattainment area, a reference back to the approved

SIP will be sufficient provided the approved SIP used the current EPA

modeling guidelines. If current EPA modeling guidelines were not used, then

new modeling may be required.

(X) () ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS FROM

EPA POLICIES: As appropriate, describe special circumstances, i.e., where

alternative RACT is used, extended compliance date are included, etc. A

completed SIP Approvability Checklist-Enforceability will fulfill this

requirement.

(X) () ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: Provide any other supporting information

concerning development of the rule or rule changes, such as staff reports.

(ARBFORM - 6/93)