alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3555.253 Late payment charges. Late payment charges will not be covered by the guarantee and cannot be added to the principal and interest due under any guaranteed note. ( a ) *Maximum amount.* Any late payment charge must be reasonable and customary for the area.
( b ) *Loans with interest assistance.* The lender must not charge a late fee if the only unpaid portion of the borrower's scheduled payment is interest assistance owed by Rural Development.
#### § 46.11 What constitutes valid license, form and use.

Each license shall bear a serial number, the names in which authorized to conduct business, type of ownership, if the business is individually owned, the name of the owner; if a partnership, the names of all general partners; if a limited liability company, the names of all members, managers, officers, directors and holders of more than 10 percent of the ownership stake, and the percentage of ownership in the company held by each such person; if a corporation or association, the names of all officers, directors, and shareholders of more than 10 percent of the outstanding stock and the percentage of stock held by each such person; the facsimile signature of the Deputy Administrator, the seal of the Department and shall be duly countersigned. The licensee may place upon his stationery, trucks, or business sign an inscription indicating that he is licensed under the Act, but such inscription must not be of such form or arrangement as to be deceptive or misleading to the public, nor shall any such inscription be displayed or used unless the person using the inscription has a license valid and effective at the time.

[28 FR 7067, July 11, 1963; 28 FR 7287, July 17, 1963, as amended at 65 FR 24854, Apr. 28, 2000]
| 1.     |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange                                       |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| /s/      Eric I. Richman                   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Eric      I. Richman                       |   |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| November      15, 2010                     |   |

----
PROJECT ASSIGNMENT


This Project Assignment is issued under the Independent Contractor
Services Agreement (“Original Agreement”) dated August 14, 2008, between Scientific Learning Corporation of
Oakland, California (“SLc”) and School
Executive Consulting, Inc. of Dallas,
Texas (“Contractor”).


Services to be performed: 


Under the direction of the CEO or the person to whom he delegates this
role, provide executive-level marketing and sales consulting services on a
nationwide basis, including but not limited to (1) activities nationwide
directed toward increasing the awareness about the Fast ForWord products and
the research behind the products and (2) assisting in the organization of a
team of prominent educational authorities in Texas to support SLC’s marketing
and sales activities in Texas under the direction of the Regional Sales
Director. 


Time Period during which Services will be
performed:


The term of
this Project Assignment will begin January 1, 2009 and end December 31, 2009.


Fees for Services:



SLC will pay
Contractor a consulting fee of $3,333 per month.


Expenses: 


SLC will also reimburse Contractor for reasonable travel, lodging,
phone, mileage and meal expenses incurred in connection with the performance of
services under this Agreement provided that Contractor has obtained prior
approval from Contractor’s principal SLC contact and submits verification of
such expenses as SLC may require. 


Payment Requirements: 


SLC
will pay Contractor the monthly consulting fee by the 15th of the applicable
month, without the need for invoice. For expenses, Contractor shall invoice
SLC. SLC will pay invoices within thirty (30) days of receipt.


NOTE:  This Project Assignment is governed by the
terms of an Independent Contractor Services Agreement in effect between SLc and
Contractor. Any item in this Project Assignment which is inconsistent with that
Agreement is invalid.


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Signed: 

	
/s/ Mike
 Moses

	
 

	
/s/ Cheryl
 Leatherbury


	
 

	 

	
 

	 


	
 

	
For Client
 Hiring Manager

	
 

	
For
 Contractor








	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Dated: 

	
3/3/09

	
 

	
3/3/09
#### Lynis M. Anderson, Appellant, v Shimella “Star” Abodeen, Defendant, and Louis Desportes et al., Respondents.

[816 NYS2d 415]

*432Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karen S. Smith, J.), entered July 8, 2005, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs causes of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress and sexual harassment based on hostile work environment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs allegation that the supervisor at his regular job as a security guard maliciously displayed to his coworkers nude photos that he had taken of himself in connection with his sideline as a model does not show conduct sufficiently outrageous to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress *(see Howell v New York Post Co.,*81 NY2d 115, 122 [1993]). While the supervisor’s display of the photos allegedly for no reason other than to ridicule and harass was certainly offensive, there is no evidence, indeed no claim, that such display was motivated by an animus against men such as might support a claim of sexual harassment *(see Brennan v Metropolitan Opera Assn.,*284 AD2d 66, 74 [2001]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
#### § 3555.250 OMB control number.

The report and recordkeeping requirements contained in this subpart are currently with the Office of Management and Budget under review and awaiting approval.
§ 3201.70 Hair care products. ( a ) *Definitions.* ( 1 ) Personal hygiene products specifically formulated for hair cleaning and treating applications, including shampoos and conditioners.
( 2 ) Hair care products for which Federal preferred procurement applies are: ( i ) *Shampoos.* These are products whose primary purpose is cleaning hair. Products that contain both shampoos and conditioners are included in this subcategory because the primary purpose of these products is cleaning the hair.
( ii ) *Conditioners.* These are products whose primary purpose is treating hair to improve the overall condition of hair.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The minimum biobased content for all hair care products shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product. The applicable minimum biobased contents for the Federal preferred procurement products are: ( 1 ) Shampoos—66 percent.
( 2 ) Conditioners—78 percent.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 23, 2012, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased hair care products. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased hair care products.
[76 FR 43817, July 22, 2011]
19.805 Competitive 8(a).

19.805-1 General.

19.805-2 Procedures.

Parent topic: Subpart 19.8 - Contracting with the Small Business Administration (The 8(a)

Program)
4.2105 Solicitation provisions and contract

clause.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.204-24, Representation Regarding Certain

Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment–

(1) In all solicitations for contracts; and

(2) Under indefinite delivery contracts, in all notices of intent to place an order, or solicitations for

an order (e.g., subpart 8.4 and 16.505).

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.204-25, Prohibition on Contracting for

Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment, in all solicitations and

contracts.

(c) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.204-26, Covered Telecommunications

Equipment or Services-Representation, in all solicitations.

Parent topic: Subpart 4.21 Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video

Surveillance Services or Equipment
# L_2021195EN.01000101.xml

| 3.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 195/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 195/1

---

IMPLEMENTING REGULATION COMMISSION (EU) 2021/890

of 27 May 2021

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Hegykői petrezselyemgyökér’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Hegykői petrezselyemgyökér’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Hegykői petrezselyemgyökér’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Hegykői petrezselyemgyökér’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Hegykői petrezselyemgyökér’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Hegykői petrezselyemgyökér’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 May 2021.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 40, 5.2.2021, p. 22.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
### -76.8 -76.6 -76.4 -76.2 -76.0
39.2 39.4 39.6 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/22 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★
★ ● ● ● ●
§ 460.11 Calculating PCCP amounts for first insured crops. ( a ) For the 2022 crop year, for eligible insured acres covered under a crop insurance policy for a first insured crop, the amount of premium support under PCCP for each insured acre will be $5, calculated on a CLU basis, with a maximum equal to the amount of premium owed by the insured.
( b ) For the 2022 crop year, in states administering a cover crop program providing premium subsidy under an active MOU with RMA, as authorized by Section 508(c)(8) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act, insured acres qualifying for a state premium subsidy amount are eligible for a matching amount under PCCP, calculated on a CLU basis, which may be in addition to the amount in paragraph (a) of this section. ( 1 ) The matching amount under PCCP per insured acre will be equal to the state contribution per insured acre on a CLU basis.
( 2 ) The matching amount under PCCP per insured acre will be limited by the amount of premium owed by the insured on a CLU basis. If limited, the state contribution amount and matching PCCP amount will be reduced proportionately on a CLU basis.
( c ) Amounts under PCCP are limited to the full amount of premium owed by the insured for the eligible insured acres on a CLU basis. If the full amount under PCCP would result in a negative premium balance for the insured on a CLU basis, PCCP amounts will be limited to the full amount of premium owed on a CLU basis, with the amount calculated in paragraph (b) of this section being applied first and the amount calculated in paragraph (a) of this section being applied second. ( 1 ) In cases where insureds are eligible for both paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, and premium owed on a CLU basis is less than the amount in paragraph (b) of this section, the state contribution amount and matching PCCP amount in paragraph (b) of this section will be reduced proportionally on a CLU basis, and there will be no PCCP premium support amount applied in paragraph (a) of this section.
( 2 ) In cases where insureds are eligible for both paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, and premium owed on a CLU basis is greater than the amount in paragraph (b) of this section but less than the sum of the amounts in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, there will be no reduction to the state contribution amount and matching PCCP amount in paragraph (b) of this section, and the PCCP premium support amount in paragraph (a) of this section will be reduced.
( d ) If the eligible insured acres are adjusted or revised for any reason, such as an overreporting of insured acres, the amount under PCCP will be based on the eligible insured acres after any such amendment.
156 So.2d 605

#### Mrs. Bess BRIDGES et al. v. Mrs. Charlene Willoughby JONES.

No. 46925.

Oct. 10, 1963.

In re: Charlene IVilloughby Jones applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 155 So.2d 457.

Writ refused. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
       Date:
    
    30 March 2007By:
    
    /s/ Roger K McGregorName:
    
    Roger K. McGregorTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer, HSBC Bank plc
 14




---



##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
       Date:
    
    30 March 2007By:
    
    /s/ Roger K McGregorName:
    
    Roger K. McGregorTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer, HSBC Bank plc
 15




---



##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
       Date:
    
    30 March 2007By:
    
    /s/ Roger K McGregorName:
    
    Roger K. McGregorTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer, HSBC Bank plc
 16
#### Irene Robbins, Respondent, v. Elliot Robbins, Appellant.

Order entered November 23, 1966, awarding plaintiff judgment in the sum of $5,534 against defendant-appellant for support and alimony arrears, and other relief, unanimously modified, on the law and facts, and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of vacating the adjudication of contempt of court, and as so modified affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. This record does not establish willful failure and refusal to make the required payments. Moreover, the plaintiff did not apply for an order of commitment. Concur—Botein, P. J., Stevens, Steuer, Rabin and McNally, JJ.
3.807 Civil penalties.

Agencies shall impose and collect civil penalties pursuant to the provisions of the Program Fraud

and Civil Remedies Act,31 U.S.C.3803 (except subsection(c)), 3804-3808, and 3812, insofar as the

provisions therein are not inconsistent with the requirements of this subpart.

Parent topic: Subpart 3.8 - Limitations on the Payment of Funds to Influence Federal Transactions
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Performanceand accountability report [electronic resource].**
 
SuDoc:HS 1.1:
ItemNumber:0520-B-05(online)
CGPsystem Number:000581495
 
2003
2004
2005
2006
§ 3201.12 Water tank coatings. ( a ) *Definition.* Coatings formulated for use in potable water storage systems.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The minimum biobased content is 59 percent and shall be based on the entire product.
( c ) *Preference effective date.* No later than November 20, 2007, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased water tank coatings. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased water tank coatings.
[71 FR 13705, Mar. 16, 2006, as amended at 71 FR 67032, Nov. 20, 2006]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Luke E. Estes, 7:20-cv-137

Case No. 3:19-MD-2885-MCR-GRJ

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that Defendants in the above-named case appeal to 

the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from the order denying 

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the government contractor defense

and granting Plaintiffs’ cross-motion (MDL Dkt. 1280), from the amended final 

judgment entered in this action on July 14, 2021 (Estes Dkt. 203), and from the 

orders denying Defendants’ Rule 50(b) and Rule 59 motions (Estes Dkt. 204, 205). 

Dated: September 7, 2021

/s/ Charles F. Beall, Jr.

Larry Hill

Florida Bar No. 173908

lhill@mhw-law.com

Charles F. Beall, Jr. 

Florida Bar No. 66494

cbeall@mhw-law.com

Respectfully submitted:

/s/ Robert C. “Mike” Brock

Robert C. “Mike” Brock

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

Telephone: (202) 389-5991

mike.brock@kirkland.com

Case 7:20-cv-00137-MCR-GRJ Document 207 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 2
2

Haley J. VanFleteren

Florida Bar No. 1003674

hvanfleteren@mhw-law.com

MOORE, HILL & WESTMORELAND, P.A.

350 West Cedar Street

Maritime Place, Suite 100

Pensacola FL 32502

Telephone: (850) 434-3541

Mark J. Nomellini

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

300 North LaSalle

Chicago, Illinois 60654

Telephone: (312) 862-3254 

mnomellini@kirkland.com

Kimberly Branscome

DECHERT LLP 

633 W. 5th St., Suite 4900

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 808-5762 

kimberly.branscome@dechert.com

Counsel for Defendants 3M Company, 

3M Occupational Safety LLC, Aearo 

Technologies LLC, Aearo Holding, 

LLC, Aearo Intermediate, LLC and 

Aearo, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 7, 2021, I caused a copy of the foregoing 

to be filed through the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will serve all counsel of 

record.

/s/ Charles F. Beall, Jr.

Charles F. Beall, Jr.

Case 7:20-cv-00137-MCR-GRJ Document 207 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2
§ 4288.121 Contract. Advanced biofuel producers determined to be eligible to receive payments must then enter into a contract with the Agency in order to participate in this Program. ( a ) *Contract.* The Agency will forward the contract to the advanced biofuel producer. The advanced biofuel producer must agree to the terms and conditions of the contract, sign, date, and return it to the Agency within the time provided by the Agency.
( b ) *Length of contract.* Once signed, a contract will remain in effect until terminated as specified in paragraph (d) of this section.
( c ) *Contract review.* All contracts will be reviewed at least annually to ensure compliance with the contract and ensure the integrity of the program.
( d ) *Contract termination.* Contracts under this Program will be terminated in writing by the Agency. Contracts may be terminated under any one of the following conditions: ( 1 ) At the mutual agreement of the parties;
( 2 ) In accordance with applicable Program notices and regulations;
( 3 ) The advanced biofuel producer withdraws from the Program and so notifies the Agency, in writing;
( 4 ) The advanced biofuel producer fails to submit the enrollment application during a sign-up period;
( 5 ) The Program is discontinued or not funded;
( 6 ) All of a participating advanced biofuel producer's advanced biofuel facilities no longer exist or no longer produce any eligible advanced biofuel; or
( 7 ) The Agency determines that the advanced biofuel producer is ineligible for participation.
§ 3560.708 Unauthorized assistance received by tenants. ( a ) Tenant actions that require tenant repayment of unauthorized assistance received by tenants include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Knowingly or mistakenly misrepresenting income, assets, adjustments to income, or household status to the borrower as required under subpart D of this part; or
( 2 ) Failure to properly report changes in income, assets, adjustments to income, or household status to the borrower as required in subpart D of this part.
( b ) Borrower actions that require borrower repayment of unauthorized assistance received by tenants include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Incorrect determination of tenant income or household status by the borrower, resulting in rental assistance or interest credit that is not allowable under the provisions of subparts D, E, or F of this part, as applicable; or
( 2 ) Assignment of rental assistance to a household that is ineligible under the requirements of subpart F of this part.
( c ) When it is determined that a tenant has received unauthorized assistance, the borrower shall notify the tenant and the Agency through the procedure specified in § 3560.704.
( d ) Borrowers may not charge tenants to pay amounts due to the Agency as a result of unauthorized assistance to tenants through borrower error.
( e ) Borrowers must notify the Agency of all collections from tenants as repayments for unauthorized assistance and must remit or credit the amounts collected to applicable housing project accounts.
( f ) When rental assistance was improperly assigned to a tenant, for any reason, the rental assistance benefit must be canceled and reassigned. ( 1 ) Before a borrower notifies a tenant of rental assistance cancellation, the borrower must request Agency approval. If the Agency determines that the unauthorized rental assistance was received by the tenant due to borrower fraud or error, the borrower must give the tenant 30 days notice, in writing, that the unit was assigned in error and that the rental assistance benefit will be canceled effective on date that the next monthly rental payment is due after the end of the 30-day notice period.
( 2 ) Tenants also must be notified, in writing, that they may cancel their lease without penalty at the time the rental assistance is canceled. Tenants must be offered an opportunity to meet with a borrower to discuss the rental assistance cancellation.