alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 72816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29899]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday December 31, 2010.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-29899 Filed 11-23-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
4.102 Contractor’s signature.       (a)                   *Individuals*. A contract with an individual shall be signed by that individual. A contract with an individual doing business as a firm shall be signed by that individual, and the signature shall be followed by the individual’s typed, stamped, or printed name and the words ", an individual doing business as _________" [*insert name of firm*].                                          (b)                   *Partnerships*. A contract with a partnership shall be signed in the partnership name. Before signing for the Government, the contracting officer shall obtain a list of all partners and ensure that the individual(s) signing for the partnership have authority to bind the partnership.                                          (c)                   *Corporations*. A contract with a corporation shall be signed in the corporate name, followed by the word "by" and the signature and title of the person authorized to sign. The contracting officer shall ensure that the person signing for the corporation has authority to bind the corporation.                                          (d)                   *Joint venturers*. A contract with joint venturers may involve any combination of individuals, partnerships, or corporations. The contract shall be signed by each participant in the joint venture in the manner prescribed in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section for each type of participant. When a corporation is participating, the contracting officer shall verify that the corporation is authorized to participate in the joint venture.                                          (e)                   *Agents*. When an agent is to sign the contract, other than as stated in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, the agent’s authorization to bind the principal must be established by evidence satisfactory to the contracting officer.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 4.1 - Contract Execution
§ 4285.70 Evaluation criteria. ( a ) In evaluating the proposal, the RDA or its successor agency staff review panel and the awarding official will take into account the degree to which the proposal demonstrates the following: ( 1 ) Focus on a practical solution to a significant problem involving one or more of the following on a cooperative business basis: the preparation for market, processing, packaging, handling, storing, transporting, distributing, or marketing of agricultural products. (35%)
( 2 ) Adequacy, soundness, and appropriateness of the proposed approach to solve the identified problem. (30%)
( 3 ) Feasibility and probability of success of project solving the problem. (10%)
( 4 ) Qualifications, experience in related work, competence, and availability of project personnel to direct and carry out the project. (25%)
( b ) In addition, the cost relative to the expected research results will be considered in determining the awarding of the agreements.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 244 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 412
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 244

                          [Report No. 109-682]

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

            Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

                           September 26, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
             hydroelectric project in the State of Wyoming.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY 
              COMMISSION HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 1651, the 
Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the project, and 
after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the 
Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time period 
during which the licensee is required to commence the construction of 
the project for 3 consecutive 2-year periods from the date of the 
expiration of the extension originally issued by the Commission.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 412

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 244

                          [Report No. 109-682]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
             hydroelectric project in the State of Wyoming.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 26, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 1 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 2 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 3 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 4 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 5 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 6 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 7 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 8 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 9 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 10 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 11 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 12 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 13 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 14 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 15 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 16 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 17 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 18 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 19 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 20 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 21 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 22 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 23 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 24 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 25 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 26 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 27 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 28 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 29 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 30 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 31 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 32 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 33 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 34 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 35 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 36 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 37 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 38 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 39 of 40Case 4:95-mc-40102-DJ Document 19 Filed 10/20/08 Page 40 of 40
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSALIO LOPEZ FRANCISCO,

Petitioner,

v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 16

- 73842

Agency No. A096

- 045

- 578

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2022 * *

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges

. Rosalio Lopez Francisco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, a nd relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPE ALS2 16

- 73842

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th

Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for r eview.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that the harm

Lopez Francisco experienced did not rise to the level of persecution. See Duran

Rodriguez v. Barr , 918 F.3d 1025, 1028

- 29 (9th Cir. 2019) (record did not compel

finding that harm rises to the level of persecution where perpetrators took no

violent actions against the petitioner or his family beyond threats). Substantial

evidence also supports the age ncy’s determination that Lopez Francisco did not

establish a well

- founded fear of future persecution. See Gu v. Gonzales , 454 F.3d

1014, 1022 (9th Cir. 2006) (petitioner failed to present “compelling, objective

evidence demonstrating a well

- founded fear of persecution”). Thus, Lopez

Francisco’s asylum claim fails.

Because Lopez Francisco failed to establish eligibility for asylum, in this

case, he did not establish eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye , 453

F.3d at 119 0.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

Lopez Francisco failed to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured by

or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico

. See

Aden v. Holder , 5 89 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).3 16

- 73842

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
§ 371.11 Delegations of authority. ( a ) *Associate Administrator.* The Associate Administrator is delegated the authority to perform the duties and to exercise the functions and powers that are now, or that may become, vested in the Administrator, including the power of redelegation except where prohibited, and including authority reserved to the Administrator in § 371.14 of this part. The Associate Administrator is also authorized to act for the Administrator in the absence of the Administrator.
( b ) *Deputy Administrators and Directors.* The Deputy Administrators of Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ), Veterinary Services (VS), Wildlife Services (WS), Marketing and Regulatory Programs Business Services (MRPBS), Animal Care (AC), and International Services (IS); the Directors of Policy and Program Development (PPD) and Legislative and Public Affairs (LPA); and the officers they designate to act for them, with prior specific approval of the Administrator, are delegated the authority, severally, to perform duties and to exercise the functions and powers that are now, or that may become vested in the Administrator (including the power of redelegation, except where prohibited) except authority that is reserved to the Administrator. Each Deputy Administrator or Director shall be responsible for the programs and activities in APHIS assigned to that Deputy Administrator or Director.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Carl E. Worboys, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dolce Ventures Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I have  indicated  in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                         Date: May 15, 2006

                                                    _/s/ Carl E. Worboys_____
                                                    Carl E. Worboys, President
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Green Planet Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 Date:   July 18, 2011By:
/s/ James C. MarshallName:  James C. MarshallTitle:  Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Green Planet Group, Inc. and will be retained by Green Planet Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31.1** **Certification    Pursuant to    Rule 13a-14(a)    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**     I, Mark R. Holden, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of American Commercial Lines Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this quarterly report,    fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosures controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over the financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/      Mark R. Holden    Mark R. Holden
§ 3570.264 Ineligible project purposes. Ineligible purposes for grant funds and any matching funds include, but are not limited to: ( a ) Duplicate services, such as those previously performed by an association's consultant in developing a Project, including feasibility, design, Professional Services, and cost estimates prior to receiving the grant award.
( b ) Purchase real estate or vehicles, improve or renovate office space, or repair and maintain privately owned property.
( c ) Pay the costs for construction, improvement, rehabilitation, modification, or operation and maintenance of an Essential Community Facility.
( d ) Procure applications for the Agency's community facilities or other loan or grant program. Grant funds cannot be used to generate new applications; however, as stated in § 3570.263(a)(4) funds can be used to assist with application preparation for Agency programs.
( e ) Pay for other costs that are not allowed under 2 CFR part 200.
( f ) Pay an outstanding judgment obtained by the U.S. in a Federal Court (other than in the United States Tax Court), which has been recorded. An Applicant will be ineligible to receive a grant until the judgment is paid in full or otherwise satisfied.
( g ) Intervene in Federal or adjudicatory proceedings.
( h ) Fund political or lobbying activities.
( i ) Conduct an income survey associated with developing a complete application for a potential Applicant.
( j ) Pay for indirect or administrative costs in excess of 10% of the amount of grant.
( k ) [Reserved]
( l ) Provide assistance to an Ultimate Recipient, or a Project, that is not located in a Rural Area.
( m ) Pay for expenses incurred more than three years after the date of the grant agreement.
( n ) Provide assistance to a Project that primarily serves an area that is not considered Low Income.
( o ) Fund a project where a Conflict of Interest exists.
[81 FR 1866, Jan. 14, 2016, as amended at 81 FR 27295, May 6, 2016]
Order filed September 15, 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00575

- CV

____________ IN THE ESTATE OF MANUELA MESA CASAS, DECEASED

On Appeal from the Probate Court No

. 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 468899



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed August 12, 2020

. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant . Rebecca Ayala, is excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Appellant is ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the c lerk of this court on or before September 25, 2020. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee, the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Zimmerer.