alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WAIVER AGREEMENT

                           DATED AS OF AUGUST 18, 1997


           Waiver  Agreement dated as of August 18, 1997 to the Revolving Credit
Agreement and Factoring  Facilities between The CIT  Group/Commercial  Services,
Inc. and Leslie Fay Marketing, Inc. dated as of June 2, 1997.

           Waiver.  In response to the  Borrower's  request,  the Lender  hereby
waives  compliance by the Borrower with the  requirements  of Section 10.17 with
respect to the fiscal quarter ending July 5, 1997.


           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Agreement
as of the date first written above.


                                   LESLIE FAY MARKETING, INC.


                                   By: /s/Warren T. Wishart
                                      ----------------------------
                                           Warren T. Wishart
                                           Secretary and Chief Financial Officer


                                   THE CIT GROUP/COMMERCIAL SERVICES


                                   By: /s/John Hendrickson
                                      ----------------------------
                                           John Hendrickson
                                           Vice President
#### § 29.2561 Tobacco products.

Manufactured tobacco, including cigarettes, cigars, smoking tobacco, chewing tobacco, and snuff.

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984 and 51 FR 40406, Nov. 7, 1986]
CDC - NIOSH Publications and Products - NIOSH Alert: Preventing As... http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-111/

1 of 13 2/1/2016 9:41 AM
CDC - NIOSH Publications and Products - NIOSH Alert: Preventing As... http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-111/

2 of 13 2/1/2016 9:41 AM
CDC - NIOSH Publications and Products - NIOSH Alert: Preventing As... http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-111/

3 of 13 2/1/2016 9:41 AM
CDC - NIOSH Publications and Products - NIOSH Alert: Preventing As... http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-111/

4 of 13 2/1/2016 9:41 AM
† ‡

†

‡

CDC - NIOSH Publications and Products - NIOSH Alert: Preventing As... http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-111/

5 of 13 2/1/2016 9:41 AM
CDC - NIOSH Publications and Products - NIOSH Alert: Preventing As... http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-111/

6 of 13 2/1/2016 9:41 AM
CDC - NIOSH Publications and Products - NIOSH Alert: Preventing As... http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-111/

7 of 13 2/1/2016 9:41 AM
CDC - NIOSH Publications and Products - NIOSH Alert: Preventing As... http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-111/

8 of 13 2/1/2016 9:41 AM
CDC - NIOSH Publications and Products - NIOSH Alert: Preventing As... http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-111/

9 of 13 2/1/2016 9:41 AM
CDC - NIOSH Publications and Products - NIOSH Alert: Preventing As... http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-111/

10 of 13 2/1/2016 9:41 AM
†

CDC - NIOSH Publications and Products - NIOSH Alert: Preventing As... http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-111/

11 of 13 2/1/2016 9:41 AM
†

CDC - NIOSH Publications and Products - NIOSH Alert: Preventing As... http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-111/

12 of 13 2/1/2016 9:41 AM
How do I view different file formats (PDF, DOC, PPT, MPEG) on this site? (http://www.cdc.gov/Other

/plugins/)

CDC - NIOSH Publications and Products - NIOSH Alert: Preventing As... http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-111/

13 of 13 2/1/2016 9:41 AM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JEFFREY S. WALLACE,

Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 4:03cv141-SPM

vs.

HENRY A. ALTMAN, et al.,

Defendants,

STANLEY AND MARGARET BOOSE, et al.,

Third-Party Plaintiffs,

vs.

CENDANT GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.,

successor-in-interest to CENDANT

GLOBAL SERVICES B.V. by assignment, et al.,

Third-Party Defendants.

_______________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Upon notification (see doc. 124) that the parties have reached a

settlement which is in the process of being finalized, pursuant to Northern District

of Florida Local Rule 16.2(D), it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. This case is dismissed.

2. The Court retains jurisdiction for a period of sixty (60) days, during

Case 4:03-cv-00141-SPM-AK Document 126 Filed 07/08/05 Page 1 of 2
which period the case may be reopened for good cause shown.

3. All pending motions are denied as moot and the pretrial conference

scheduled for July 11, 2005 is cancelled. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of July, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cv-00141-SPM-AK Document 126 Filed 07/08/05 Page 2 of 2
§ 205.100 What has to be certified. ( a ) Except for the exempt operations described in § 205.101, each operation or portion of an operation that produces or handles agricultural products intended to be sold, labeled, or represented as “100 percent organic,” “organic,” or “made with organic (specified ingredients or food group(s))” must be certified according to the provisions of subpart E of this part and must meet all other applicable requirements of this part.
( b ) Any production or handling operation or specified portion of a production or handling operation that has been already certified by a certifying agent on the date that the certifying agent receives its accreditation under this part shall be deemed to be certified under the Act until the operation's next anniversary date of certification. Such recognition shall only be available to those operations certified by a certifying agent that receives its accreditation within 18 months from February 20, 2001.
( c ) Any person or responsibly connected person that: ( 1 ) Knowingly sells or labels a product as organic, except in accordance with the Act, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than the amount specified in § 3.91(b)(1) of this title per violation.
( 2 ) Makes a false statement under the Act to the Secretary, a governing State official, or an accredited certifying agent shall be subject to the provisions of section 1001 of title 18, United States Code.
[65 FR 80637, Dec. 21, 2000, as amended at 70 FR 29579, May 24, 2005; 80 FR 6429, Feb. 5, 2015; 88 FR 3621, Jan. 19, 2023]
98-1156.

#### Bagnoli v. Northbrook Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.

Stark App. No. 97CA00415.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Report of Silver Pearl Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ DENISE D.
      SMITH
                Denise
      D. Smith
                Sole
      Member of the Board of Directors
                Dated:
      August 12, 2009
                
                
                /s/ DENISE D. SMITH
                Denise
      D. Smith
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                Dated:
      August 12, 2009
                
                
                /s/
      DENISE D. SMITH
                Denise
      D. Smith
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                Dated:
      August 12, 2009
                
                
                /s/ DENISE D. SMITH
                Denise
      D. Smith
                Principal
      Accounting Officer
                Dated:
      August 12, 2009




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 99.2
          TO CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC. REPORT ON FORM 10K
                          NOVEMBER 30, 2002
           CERTIFICATION BY KEVIN J. MCANDREW PURSUANT TO
        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of Canterbury Consulting Group,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that
the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended November 30, 2002 (the
"Periodic Report") accompanying this certification fully complies with
the requirements of the Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained
in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The
foregoing certification is incorporated solely for purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not
intended to be used for any other purpose.


                 /s/Kevin J. McAndrew
                  Kevin J. McAndrew
                  Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 7, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Investors Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: February 9, 2007
    /s/ Domenick A. CamaDomenick A. CamaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 36
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk March 4, 2013

d0225 

# Order

March 4, 2013

145153(38)

MARKELL VANSLEMBROUCK, a Legally

Incapacitated Minor, by and through her

Conservator, ERIC BRAVERMAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

and SC: 145153

COA: 309680

Oakland CC: 2006

- 074585

- NH

KIMBERLY A. VANSLEMBROUCK,

Plaintiff,

v

ANDREW JAY HALPERIN, M.D. and

WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL,

Defendants

- Appellants,

and

MICHIGAN INSTITUTE OF

GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, P.C.,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s December 7,

2012 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.

V IVIANO , J., not participating.
149 So.2d 764

#### SOUTHLAND RENTALS, INC. v. Scott WALKER et al.

No. 46530.

Feb. 8, 1963.

The application is denied. We find no error in the judgment complained of.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILLIAM MORRIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1231

[March 22, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502015CF009533A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

July 24, 2012

t0716

Order 

July 24, 2012

144950 & (21)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144950

COA: 307873 

St Joseph CC: 02-011244-FC

ROBERT EARL HACKNEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 29, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is 

DENIED.
September 25, 2014

To: expartecommunication@hq.doe.gov (sent via email) Re: Corrected Memorandum Summarizing Ex Parte Communication This memorandum is submitted to revise and correct our earlier memorandum submitted on September 23 rd

. On September 12, 2014, representatives of the American Gas Association (AGA) met with staff of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to share and discuss the results of a national survey of builders and contractors designed to identify the likely rates of fu el switching under a scenario of a national condensing standard for gas furnaces and the output from a sp readsheet model developed by AGA and the Gas Technology Institute designed to assess and quantify the impacts of the fuel switching data gathered from the contractor/builder survey. The purpose of this meeting was to encourage DOE to incorporate similar types of analyses in the rulemaking proceeding underway on a new gas furnace standard. The subject of establishing two product categories for furnaces was also discussed as a possible option for consideration in the rulemaking proceeding. The following persons attended the meeting: Representing the Department of Energy

 Judith Greenwald

 Joseph Hezir

 Melanie Kenderdine Representing the American Gas Association

 Kathryn Clay

 David McCurdy Documents review and discussed at the meeting are attached. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Kathryn Clay Kathryn Clay | Vice President, Policy Strategy American Gas Association 400 N. Capitol St., NW | Washington, DC | 20001 P: 202- 824 -7122 | F: 202-824-9125 | kclay@aga.org
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Morlex, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
      for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald Barrick,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
                Donald Barrick
              -----------------------------------
              Donald
                Barrick
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              June
                20, 2006







16
#### The State ex rel. Holt, Appellant, *v.*St. Elizabeth Medical Center et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Holt v. St. Elizabeth Med. Ctr.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 359.]

(No. 96-1848

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*Michael J. Muldoon,*for appellant.

*Dinsmore & Shohl, P.L.L., Joan M. Verchot*and *Kim Wilson Burke,*for appellee St. Elizabeth Medical Center.

*360
      *Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Michael A Vanderhorst,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### The State ex rel. Woodruff, Appellant, *v.*United Parcel Service et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Woodruff v. United Parcel Serv.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 147.]

(No. 97-143

Submitted July 15, 1998

Decided September 16, 1998.)

*Barkan & Neff Co., L.P.A.,*and *Robert E. DeRose,*for appellant.

*Millisor & Nobil, Preston J. Garvin*and *Sara L. Rose,*for appellee United Parcel Service.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *William J. McDonald,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2963

In Re: CHRIS J. EUBANKS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-95-117)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chris J. Eubanks, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Chris J. Eubanks petitions this court for a writ of mandamus

pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21, requesting that we direct a district court judge to enter a default judgment against the Defendants in Eubanks's pending civil rights action.

Mandamus is an extraordinary writ that should be granted only

in unusual circumstances not present here. Kerr v. United States

District Court, 426 U.S. 394 (1976). Further, it cannot be used as

a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958,

960 (4th Cir. 1979). Accordingly, we deny Eubanks's petition for

writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Editorial Note on Part 3402
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3402 appear at 76 FR 4807, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3402.1 Applicability of regulations. ( a ) The regulations of this part apply to competitive grants awarded under the provisions of section 1417(b)(6) of the National Agricultural Research, Extension and Teaching Policy Act of 1977, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 3152(b)(6). The Act designates the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) as the lead Federal agency for agricultural research, extension, and teaching in the food and agricultural sciences. Section 1417(b)(6) authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture, who has delegated the authority to theNational Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), to make competitive grants to land-grant colleges and universities, colleges and universities having significant minority enrollments and a demonstrable capacity to carry out the teaching of food and agricultural sciences, and to other colleges and universities having a demonstrable capacity to carry out the teaching of food and agricultural sciences, to administer and conduct graduate and postdoctoral fellowship programs to help meet the Nation's needs for development of scientific and professional expertise in the food and agricultural sciences. The Graduate Fellowships are intended to encourage outstanding students to pursue and complete graduate degrees in the areas of food and agricultural sciences designated by NIFA through the Office of Higher Education Programs (HEP) as national needs. The postdoctoral Fellowships are intended to provide additional mentoring and training to outstanding USDA Graduate Fellows who completed their doctoral degrees no more than five (5) years before they begin the postdoctoral Fellowships.
( b ) The regulations of this part do not apply to grants awarded by the Department of Agriculture under any other authority.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Dolce Ventures Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Carl E. Worboys,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                             /s/ Carl E. Worboys
                                             -------------------
                                             Carl E. Worboys
                                             President, Dolce Ventures Inc.
                                             (Principal Executive Officer)

                                             Date: May 15, 2006