alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 371.9 Policy and Program Development. ( a ) *General statement.* Policy and Program Development (PPD) provides analytical support for agency decisions and plans.
( b ) *Director of PPD.* The Director of PPD is responsible for: ( 1 ) Participating with the Administrator of APHIS and other officials in the planning and formulation of APHIS policies, programs, and activities.
( 2 ) Providing planning and evaluations; regulations development; and policy, risk, and economic analysis for APHIS programs.
( 3 ) Analyzing the environmental effects of APHIS programs to ensure their compliance with environmental laws and regulations and providing support for pesticide registration and drug approval.
( 4 ) Coordinating registration of chemicals and other substances used in APHIS control and eradication programs.
Exhibit 10.27


 


 


Description of annual cash incentive awards
to executives


 


The Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees (the “Compensation
Committee”) of Corporate Office Properties Trust (the “Company”) considers the
award of annual cash incentive awards designed to correlate executive
compensation to the overall performance of the Company and to the performance
of each executive’s specific business unit.


 


The Compensation Committee establishes target performance levels for
the Company in general and for the business units specifically by using two REIT
peer groups' bonus information, along with a summary of the objectives for the
Company and its business units. The Committee then establishes annual cash
incentive award targets based on different thresholds of performance in meeting
the performance levels.


 


The Committee uses the median bonus level for executive positions in
the REIT peer groups as a guideline for determining a Company executive’s
target bonus to be awarded if the Company and the executive’s business unit
meet target performance levels. Each executive may generally earn up to an
established maximum percentage of his or her annual salary if
higher-than-target performance levels are achieved, and will generally receive
less than the target bonus if the target performance levels are not met,
although bonuses could not be paid at all if a defined minimum performance
level is not met.


 


The measures used in defining overall Company performance objectives
for determining bonuses are diluted funds from operations per share and diluted
adjusted funds from operations per share (both of which are measurements used
by equity REITs to evaluate financial performance).  The measures used in
defining business unit performance are tailored to apply to the nature of each
business unit’s operations.  The measures
used in computing the bonus of the Chief Operating Officer include only overall
Company performance measures.  The measures used in computing the bonuses
of the other executives include overall Company performance measures as well as
measures applicable to each executive’s business unit.


 


The Compensation Committee has the discretion to award higher or lower
annual cash incentive awards to executives relative to amounts computed in
accordance with the methodology set forth above.
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**


**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      David
      LaDuke, certify that:





1. I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sputnik, Inc.;





2. Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I
      am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
      business issuer and have:





(a) designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) evaluated
      the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) disclosed
      in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
      reporting.





5. I
      have
      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit
      committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing
      the equivalent functions):





(a) all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial information; and




(b) any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
      financial reporting.





Date: 
      May 11, 2007


/s/
      David
      LaDuke


Name: David
      LaDuke


Title: President,
      Chief Executive Officer, and Treasurer
Editorial Note on Part 3407
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3407 appear at 76 FR 4810, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3407.5 Classes of action. The following describes typical classes of action associated with NIFA programs and related activities: ( a ) Actions which normally do not require the preparation of an EA or an EIS are those actions which ordinarily do not have significant individual or cumulative effect on the quality of the human environment. These include those activities described in §§ 3407.6 (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this part.
( b ) Actions normally requiring an EA, but not necessarily an EIS, are those projects in which at least some level of uncertainty exists regarding individual or cumulative effects on the quality of the human environment. Such actions generally include those identified in §§ 3407.6(b) and 3407.7 of this part.
( c ) Actions normally requiring an EIS are projects which are determined to have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment or which will be performed under extraordinary circumstances. These types of actions are identified in §§ 3407.6(b) and 3407.8 of this part.
Editorial Note on Part 3402
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3402 appear at 76 FR 4807, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3402.23 Documentation of progress on funded projects. ( a ) Fellowships/Scholarships Entry/Exit Forms (Form NIFA-2010) are available from NIFA upon request. Upon request by HEP, Project Directors awarded Graduate Fellowship (excluding supplemental international and postdoctoral) grants under the program shall complete and submit this form. ( 1 ) Appointment Information shall be submitted to HEP within 3 months of appointment of a Fellow;
( 2 ) The Project Director shall submit an annual update of each Fellow's progress to HEP by September 30 each year. Additional progress reports may be needed to assess continuing progress of Fellows supported by any special international study or thesis/dissertation research allowance and/or institutional adherence to program guidelines.
( 3 ) Exit Information shall be completed and submitted to HEP by the Project Director for each Fellow supported by a grant as soon as a Fellow either: Graduates; is officially terminated from the Fellowship or the academic program due to unsatisfactory academic progress; or voluntarily withdraws from the Fellowship or the academic program. If a Fellow has not completed all degree requirements at the end of the five-year grant duration, HEP may request a preliminary exit report. In such a case, a final exit report shall be required at a later date. When a final exit report for each Fellow supported by a grant has been accepted by HEP, the grantee will have satisfied the requirement of a final performance report for the grant. Additional follow-up reports to track Fellows' career patterns may be requested.
( b ) All grantees (supplemental international, graduate, and postdoctoral) shall submit initial project information and annual and summary reports to NIFA' Current Research Information System (CRIS). The CRIS database contains narrative project information, progress/impact statements, and final technical reports that are made available to the public. For applications recommended for funding, instructions on preparation and submission of project documentation will be provided to the applicant by the agency contact. Documentation must be submitted to CRIS before NIFA funds will be released. Project reports will be requested by the CRIS office when required. For more information about CRIS, visit *http://cris.nifa.usda.gov .*
Mr. Warren Paschal 

Manager of Environmental Compliance 

General Shale Brick 

1600 Colon Road 

Sanford, North Carolina 27330 

Dear Mr. Paschal: 

 Thank you for reviewing and commenting on the trip report for the July 29, 2008 visit to 

the General Shale Brick facility in Moncure, North Carolina, by representatives from the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and RTI International (RTI). Your comments have 

been incorporated in the enclosed final trip report. As you did not designate any information in 

the trip report as confidential, EPA will consider the trip report to be non-confidential. Also, 

unless we hear from you by January 21, 2009 with corrections, EPA will consider the enclosed 

report to be final. 

 If you have any questions or additional comments, please contact Mr. Jeff Telander of 

EPA at (919) 541-5427 or Mr. Rick Marinshaw of RTI at (919) 316-3735. Thank you for your 

cooperation. 

Sincerely, 

 Steve Fruh, Group Leader 

 Metals and Minerals Group 

 Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Enclosure
AAM

- 13

- 056

- E December 11, 2012

Exemption No. 9852B Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2009

- 0289

Mr. Kevin Waters Director of Operations

Waters Aero

- Marine, Inc.

P.O. Box 273 South Thomaston, ME 04 858

Dear Mr. Waters :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 9852 , as amended . It explain the basis our decision and describes its effect , and lists the conditions and

limitations

.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 29, 2012

, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA)

on behalf of Waters Aero

- Marine, Inc. ( Waters Aero

- Marine )

, for an extension of Exemption No. 9852, as amended. That exemption part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Waters Aer o

- Marine to cover its safety

- sensitive employees under one testing program.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original e xemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Waters Aero

- Marine

.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9852, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore,2

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Waters Aero

- Marine are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of

the Waters Aero

- Marine part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 201 5 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. Federal Air Surgeon
#### § 3560.557 [Reserved]
§ 330.402 Garbage generated in Hawaii. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to garbage generated in households, commercial establishments, institutions, and businesses prior to interstate movement from Hawaii, and includes used paper, discarded cans and bottles, and food scraps. Such garbage includes, and is commonly known as, municipal solid waste. ( 1 ) Industrial process wastes, mining wastes, sewage sludge, incinerator ash, or other wastes from Hawaii that the Administrator determines do not pose risks of introducing animal or plant pests or diseases into the continental United States are not regulated under this section.
( 2 ) The interstate movement from Hawaii to the continental United States of agricultural wastes and yard waste (other than incidental amounts (less than 3 percent) that may be present in municipal solid waste despite reasonable efforts to maintain source separation) is prohibited.
( 3 ) Garbage generated onboard any means of conveyance during interstate movement from Hawaii is regulated under § 330.401.
( b ) *Restrictions on interstate movement of garbage.* The interstate movement of garbage generated in Hawaii to the continental United States is regulated as provided in this section. ( 1 ) The garbage must be processed, packaged, safeguarded, and disposed of using a methodology that the Administrator has determined is adequate to prevent the introduction or dissemination of plant pests into noninfested areas of the United States.
( 2 ) The garbage must be moved under a compliance agreement in accordance with § 330.403. APHIS will only enter into a compliance agreement when the Administrator is satisfied that the Agency has first satisfied all its obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act and all applicable Federal and State statutes to fully assess the impacts associated with the movement of garbage under the compliance agreement.
( 3 ) All such garbage moved interstate from Hawaii to any of the continental United States must be moved in compliance with all applicable laws for environmental protection.
Exhibit 10.16


               Summary Sheet of Non-Employee Director Compensation
                               (effective 1/1/04)
                               ------------------

a.   Annual cash retainer -- $25,000

b.   Annual deferred stock unit award -- $30,000 value

c.   Board meeting attendance -- $1,500 per meeting ($750 if attendance by
     telephone)

d.   Committee meeting attendance -- $2,000 per meeting ($750 if attendance by
     telephone)

e.   Committee chairperson annual retainer -- $5,000 ($10,000 for chairperson of
     Audit Committee)

f.   Lead Director annual retainer -- $10,000
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
   2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of Advanced BioEnergy, LLC, as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;
 4.
    
    Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for Advanced BioEnergy, LLC, and have:
 d)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Advanced BioEnergy, LLC, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;e)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andf)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs
auditors and the audit committee of Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs internal controls over
financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2006
    /s/ Robert W. HolmesRobert W. Holmes, (Principal Financial Officer)
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2348 

To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to require a licensee to notify 

the Atomic Energy Commission, and the State and county in which 

a facility is located, whenever there is an unplanned release of fission 

products in excess of allowable limits. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2006 

Mr. OBAMA (for himself and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to require a 

licensee to notify the Atomic Energy Commission, and 

the State and county in which a facility is located, whenever there is an unplanned release of fission products 

in excess of allowable limits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Release Notice 

5 Act of 2006’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2348 IS

1 SEC. 2. NUCLEAR RELEASE NOTICE REQUIREMENT. 

2 Section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 

3 U.S.C. 2133) is amended— 

4 (1) by redesignating subsection f. as subsection 

5 e.; and 

6 (2) in subsection e. (as so redesignated)— 

7 (A) by designating the first, second, and 

8 third sentences as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), 

9 respectively; 

10 (B) by striking the subsection designation 

11 and paragraph (1) (as so designated) and in12 serting the following: 

13 ‘‘f. NOTICE OF UNPLANNED RELEASE OF RADIO14 ACTIVE SUBSTANCES.— 

15 ‘‘(1) NOTICE REQUIRED.— 

16 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Each license issued 

17 for a utilization facility under this section or 

18 section 104 b. shall require as a condition of 

19 the license that in case of an unplanned release 

20 described in subparagraph (B), the licensee 

21 shall immediately notify the Commission, and 

22 the State and county in which the facility is lo23 cated, of the release. 

24 ‘‘(B) UNPLANNED RELEASES.—Subpara25 graph (A) applies to any unplanned release of 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•S 2348 IS

1 quantities of fission products or other radio2 active substances— 

3 ‘‘(i) in excess of allowable limits for 

4 normal operation established by the Com5 mission or other applicable Federal laws or 

6 standards; and 

7 ‘‘(ii) within allowable limits for nor8 mal operation established by the Commis9 sion or other applicable Federal laws or 

10 standards but that occurs more than twice 

11 within a 2-year period originating from the 

12 same source, process, or equipment at a 

13 facility.’’; and 

14 (C) in paragraph (3) (as so designated), by 

15 striking ‘‘date of enactment of this subsection’’ 

16 and inserting ‘‘date of enactment of the Nu17 clear Release Notice Act of 2006’’. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
# L_2020326EN.01000401.xml

| 8.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 326/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 326/4

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1416

of 1 October 2020

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Ρόδι Ερμιόνης’ (Rodi Ermionis) (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Greece’s application to register the name ‘Ρόδι Ερμιόνης’ (Rodi Ermionis) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Greece’s application to register the name ‘Ρόδι Ερμιόνης’ (Rodi Ermionis) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Ρόδι Ερμιόνης’ (Rodi Ermionis) should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Ρόδι Ερμιόνης’ (Rodi Ermionis) should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Ρόδι Ερμιόνης’ (Rodi Ermionis) (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 October 2020.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 200, 15.6.2020, p. 12.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---