alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 3560.706 Offsets.

Offsets and any other available remedies may be used by the Agency to recapture unauthorized assistance. Guidance concerning use of offsets can be found at 7 CFR 3550.210.
9.108-2 Prohibition.       (a)                    						            Section 745 of Division D of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Pub. L. 110-161) and its successor provisions in subsequent appropriations acts (and as extended in continuing resolutions) prohibit, on a Governmentwide basis, the use of appropriated (or otherwise made available) funds for contracts with either an inverted domestic corporation, or a subsidiary of such a corporation, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section and in 9.108-4 Waiver.                                          (b)                                                         (1)                          								                Section 745 and its successor provisions include the following exception: This section shall not apply to any Federal Government contract entered into before the date of the enactment of this Act, or to any task order issued pursuant to such contract.                                                            (2)                          								                To ensure appropriate application of the prohibition and this exception, contracting officers should consult with legal counsel if, during the performance of a contract, a contractor becomes an inverted domestic corporation or a subsidiary of one.    **Parent topic:** 9.108 Prohibition on contracting with inverted domestic corporations.
ex10_26.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit
10.26

    


    


    Orthofix
International N.V.

    Director
Fee Policy

    


    


    The Board
of Directors (“Board”) of Orthofix
International N.V. (the “Company”) has adopted
this policy to assist the compensation committee of the Board (the “Committee”) in
establishing fees (and payment thereof) associated with director
compensation.  Any new director fee policies enacted from time to time
are deemed to be incorporated herein upon their effective date. The Committee
and/or the Board shall review and reassess this policy from time to time to
determine whether the policy should be updated.

    


    Directors
are traditionally elected each year at the Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders of the Company, usually held in June.  Other director
appointments occur from time to time as determined by the Board, for instance,
in the event of vacancies on the Board resulting from a director’s death or
resignation.  Upon election or appointment to the Board, each director
is entitled to an annual fee of $55,000 for his or her services, pro-rated for
any partial year of service.  Chairmen of Committees are entitled to
additional compensation ranging from $5,000 to $10,000 for serving in those
capacities.  The Chairman of the Board receives an annual fee of
$200,000. The Company does not pay any other meeting or Board
fees.  These fees may be modified or adjusted from time to time as
determined by the Board on recommendation of the Committee.

    


    Further,
upon election, re-election or appointment to the Board, each director shall have
the option to be paid his or her director fee in either U.S. dollars or his or
her local currency.  The local currency shall be the currency of the
country of such director’s residence at the time of his or her election,
re-election or appointment.  If the director opts to be paid his or
her fee in his or her local currency (other than the U.S. dollar), any exchange
rate used in calculating such fee shall be established upon such director’s
election to the Board at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of the
Company or, if occurring at another time, upon his or her election or
appointment to the Board.  If no such currency election is made by the
director, the Company shall pay director fees in US dollars. By notice to the
Secretary of the Corporation, upon a director’s re-election to the Board, a
director may revoke his or her request to have director fees paid based on local
currency.
Amendment to Deferred Financing Fee Agreement



 Exhibit 10.7.1 
  
 AMENDMENT TO 
 DEFERRED FINANCING FEE AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS
AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED FINANCING FEE AGREEMENT, dated as of March 7, 2005 (this “Amendment”), is entered into by and between FREIGHTCAR AMERICA, INC. (formerly known as Rabbit Hill Holdings, Inc.), a Delaware corporation
(“FCA”), and CARAVELLE INVESTMENT FUND, L.L.C. (“Caravelle”). 
  
 RECITALS: 
  
 WHEREAS, FCA
and Caravelle are parties to that certain Deferred Financing Agreement, dated as of June 3, 1999 (the “Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, FCA and Caravelle desire to amend certain provisions in the Agreement relating to the termination of the Agreement, subject to the terms and
conditions set forth herein. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto
agree as follows: 
  
 1. Definitions. All capitalized
terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. 
  
 2. Amendment. The Agreement is hereby amended by replacing Section 4 of the Agreement in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 “Section 4. Termination. This Agreement will terminate automatically upon the earlier of (a) the date on which
Caravelle shall own less than 1,250 shares of Common Stock (other than due to a recapitalization of the Company, whether by reclassification, merger, reorganization or otherwise) or (b) an initial public offering of the Company’s common stock
and the payment of a termination fee of $100,000 to Caravelle, which amount shall be payable promptly following the completion of such initial public offering. The provisions of Section 2 shall survive any termination of this Agreement.”

  
 3. No Further Amendments. Except as expressly amended
hereby, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. Each party agrees to be bound by all of the terms of the Agreement, as amended hereby. 
  
 4. Miscellaneous. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

  

			
	 FREIGHTCAR AMERICA, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Kevin P. Bagby


	 Name:
	 	Kevin P. Bagby
	 Title:
	 	Chief Financial Officer
	
	 CARAVELLE INVESTMENT FUND, L.L.C.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Jay Bloom


	 Name:
	 	 Jay Bloom

	 Title:
The mission of the Office of the Clerk of the Northern District of Florida is to provide superior service to the public and the Court.

Tallahassee Division (850) 521-3501 • Pensacola Division (850) 435-8440 • Panama City Division (850) 769-4556

Northern District of Florida

William M. McCool, Clerk of Court

401 Southeast First Avenue

Gainesville, Florida 32601

(352) 380-2400

May 9, 2007

To:

U.S. District Court

Federal Building and United States Courthouse

315 South McDuffie Street, 2nd Floor

Anderson, South Carolina 29624

Re: USA v. Calvin Brewington; NDFL Case No. 1:02cr42 MMP

Your Case No. Unknown

The above-styled criminal action is being transferred to your district pursuant to

an order entered on 4/12/07 by Senior Judge Maurice M. Paul.

Attached are a copy of the order of transfer, indictment, judgment, docket sheet

and instructions on how to obtain the electronic file (Our official file).

Please acknowledge receipt on the enclosed copy of this letter of transmittal.

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Blair K. Patton

Deputy Clerk: Blair K. Patton

Attachments

Date of receipt of case in your district: 

Your Case No: 

Case 1:02-cr-00042-MP-AK Document 139 Filed 05/09/07 Page 1 of 1
#### § 3565.253 Form of ownership.

The property must be owned in fee simple or be subject to a ground lease or other legal right in land acceptable to the Agency.
§ 3560.62 Technical, legal, insurance, and other services. ( a ) *Legal services.* Applicants must have written contracts for any legal services that are to be paid out of Agency loan funds.
( b ) *Title clearance.* Applicants must obtain title clearance in accordance with the provisions of 7 CFR part 1927, subpart B applicable to title clearance, which would include title insurance or title opinion, unless the loan applicant is leasing the property or is an organization or an individual with special title or loan closing problems, in which case title clearance and related legal services will be obtained in accordance with procedures approved by the Agency.
( c ) *Architectural services.* Applicants must obtain a written contract for architectural services in accordance with the provisions of 7 CFR part 1924, subpart A.
( d ) *Insurance.* Applicants must have property and liability coverage at loan closing as well as flood insurance, if needed. Fidelity coverage must be in force as soon as there are assets within the organization and it must be obtained before any loan funds or interim financing funds are made available to the borrower. At a minimum, applicants must meet the property, liability, flood, and fidelity insurance requirements in § 3560.105.
( e ) *Surety bonding.* Applicants must comply with the surety bonding provisions of 7 CFR part 1924, subpart A.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50888

Summary Calendar

SCOTT K. SINKS,

Petitioner-Appellee,

versus

J. SLADE, Warden, FCI La Tuna,

Respondent-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-97-CV-116-F

- - - - - - - - - - November 27, 1998

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Respondent appeals the district court’s g rant of an

application for writ of habeas corpus filed by Scott K. Sinks,

federal prisone r # 19753-009. Sinks had applied for the writ on

the ground that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) had erroneously

classified his drug conviction as a crime of violence and therefore

had determined that he was ineligible for early release pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3621(e)(2)(B). S ee BOP Program Statement No. 5612.02,

Section 9. The district court granted the writ, holding that theNo. 97-50888

- 2 -

BOP had misapplied § 3621(e)(2)(B) when it took into consideration

Sinks’ sentencing enhancement for possession of a firearm during

the commission of the offense.

After the district co urt reached its decision, this court

squarely addressed the issue in Venegas v. Henman , 126 F.3d 760,

761-65 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied

, 118 S. Ct. 1679 (1998). The

court held that the BOP’s exclusion from eligibility for early

release of prisoners with drug conv ictions who had received

enhanced sentences for possession of a weapon, “is consistent with

the letter and spirit of the Bureau’s authority as derived from

section 3621(e).” Id. at 765.

Sinks argues that this court’s decisi on in V enegas is

incorrect. However, only an “overriding Supreme Court decision,”

a change in s tatutory law, or this court sitting en banc may

overrule a panel decision. S ee United States v. Zuniga-Salinas

,

952 F.2d 876, 877 (5th Cir. 1992) (en banc). In light of the

court’s decision in Venegas

, the judgment of the district court is

REVERSED and the case REMANDED.

Sinks’ motion for appointment of counsel and for oral argument

is DENIED.

REVERSED AND REMANDED; MOTION DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32

     CERTIFICATIONS OF JOSEPH R. ROZELLE, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
       PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VPGI Corp. (the
 "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
 and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,   the
 undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to  18 U.S.C. S1350,
 as adopted pursuant to S906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to  the
 best of my knowledge:

      1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information contained in  the Report fairly  presents, in  all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the
 Company.


 Date:  May 15, 2007            /s/   JOSEPH R. ROZELLE
                               -------------------------------
                               JOSEPH R. ROZELLE
                               Chief Executive Officer
                               and Principal Financial Officer



 The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-
 Q pursuant  to Item  601(b)(32) of  Regulation S-K  and Section  906 of  the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed  as
 part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities  Exchange
 Act of  1934, as  amended, and  is not  incorporated by  reference into  any
 filings of  the Company,  whether  made before  or  after the  date  hereof,
 regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2376 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2376

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 80 Killian Road in Massapequa, New York, as the ``Gerard A. Fiorenza 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2006

  Mrs. Clinton (for herself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 80 Killian Road in Massapequa, New York, as the ``Gerard A. Fiorenza 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GERARD A. FIORENZA POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 80 Killian Road in Massapequa, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Gerard A. Fiorenza Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Gerard A. 
Fiorenza Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. - Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K (03-16-05)



Exhibit 10.17




          The following persons have a percentage benefit multiplier under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the "Plan") of 2.4% or 2.0%, as indicated below, in lieu of the 1.6% of final average monthly remuneration benefit multiplier described in the Plan:


	
 
	
2.4%
	
2.0%
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Steven M. Duffy
	
William J.B. Brown
	
 

	
 
	
V. Dean Estes
	
Arthur G. Croci
	
 

	
 
	
Stephen L. Gulis, Jr.
	
Richard C. DeBlasio
	
 

	
 
	
Blake W. Krueger
	
Gary Fountain
	
 

	
 
	
Timothy J. O'Donovan
	
Ted Gedra
	
 

	
 
	
Robert J. Sedrowski
	
Jacques Lavertue
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Thomas P. Mundt
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Nicholas P. Ottenwess
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
A. T. Payne
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
James Weston
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Spencer E. Zimmerman
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
James D. Zwiers
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Bruce Scott Sible
§ 3560.68 Permitted return on investment (ROI). ( a ) *Permitted return.* Borrowers operating on a limited profit basis will be permitted a return not to exceed 8 percent of their required initial investment determined at the time of loan approval in accordance with § 3560.63(c).
( b ) *Calculation of permitted return.* The permitted return will be based on the borrower's contributions from their own resources, which, when added to the Agency loan amount and all sources of funding or financing, do not exceed the security value of the MFH project as specified in § 3560.63(a). ( 1 ) Proceeds received by the borrower from the syndication of low-income housing tax credit and contributed to the MFH project may be considered funds from the borrower's own resources for the portion of the proceeds which exceeds: ( i ) The allowable developer's fee determined by the state agency administering the low-income housing tax credit, and
( ii ) The borrower's expected contribution to the transaction, as determined by the state agency administering the low-income housing tax credit.
( 2 ) A building site contributed by the borrower will be appraised by the Agency to determine its market value. A return may not be allowed on the amount above the equity contribution required by § 3560.63(c) if the market value as determined by the Agency, when added to the loan and grant amounts from all sources, exceeds the security value of the MFH project as specified in § 3560.63(a).
( c ) *Return on additional investment.* The initial investment may exceed the equity contribution required by § 3560.63(c) and a return allowed on the investment if the additional return does not increase basic rents and rental assistance costs above what basic rents and rental assistance costs would have been with the Agency financing 95 or 97 percent of the total development cost.
( d ) *Compensation to nonprofit organizations.* Although nonprofit organizations are not eligible to take a return on investment, with prior Agency approval, cooperatives and nonprofit organizations may use housing project funds to pay asset management expenses directly attributable to ownership responsibilities, as described in § 3560.303(b)(1)(ii).
# L_2021329EN.01000601.xml

| 17.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 329/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 329/6

---

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2021/1528

of 8 June 2021

correcting the Swedish language version of Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items (1), and in particular Article 15(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Swedish language version of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 contains errors in Category 1, Section 1A005.b; Category 3, Section 3B001.a.3, Category 5, Part 2, Section 5A002.a, Note 2, point (e) and Note 2 j, ‘Technical Notes’, point 1; Category 5, Part 2, Section 5A003.a and Category 9, Section 9A010.c that affect the definitions of the products in question. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Swedish language version of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 contains errors in Category 1, Section 1A005.b; Category 3, Section 3B001.a.3, Category 5, Part 2, Section 5A002.a, Note 2, point (e) and Note 2 j, ‘Technical Notes’, point 1; Category 5, Part 2, Section 5A003.a and Category 9, Section 9A010.c that affect the definitions of the products in question.

| (2) | The Swedish language version of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Swedish language version of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

(does not concern the English language)

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 June 2021.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 134, 29.5.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.820 Financings in the form of guarantees. ( a ) *General rule.* At the request of an Enterprise or where necessary to protect your existing Financing in a Portfolio Concern, you may guarantee the monetary obligation of an Enterprise to any non-Associate creditor.
( b ) *Exception.* You may not issue a guaranty if: ( 1 ) You would become subject to State regulation as an insurance, guaranty or surety business; or
( 2 ) The amount of the guaranty plus any direct Financings to the Enterprise exceed the overline limitations of § 4290.740, except that a pledge of the Equity Securities of the issuer or a subordination of your lien or creditor position does not count toward your overline.
( c ) *Pledge of RBIC's assets as guaranty.* For purposes of this section, a guaranty with recourse only to specific asset(s) you have pledged is equal to the fair market value of such asset(s) or the amount of the debt guaranteed, whichever is less.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Silver Pearl Enterprises, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  August
13, 2008





/s/ Denise
Smith





Name: Denise Smith


Title:  Chief
Executive Officer











Dated:  July
15, 2008





/s/ Denise
Smith





Name: Denise Smith


Title:  Chief
Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2240 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of SurgiCare, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith G. LeBlanc,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

3. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

4. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


--------------------------------
Phil Scott, CFO
November 19, 2002

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------