alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SEALED
v. INDICTMENT

PHILLIP GOLIGHTLY AZo or 82- Mw

THE GRAND JURY CHARGES:
COUNT ONE
On or about November 10, 2019, in the Northern District of Florida, the
defendant,
PHILLIP GOLIGHTLY,
while in a Federal prison, namely, the Federal Correctional Institution in
Tallahassee, did knowingly engage in a sexual act with K.D., who was in official
detention and under the custodial, supervisory, and disciplinary authority of
PHILLIP GOLIGHTLY, a correctional officer.
In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2243(b).
COUNT TWO
On or about November 17, 2019, in the Northern District of Florida, the
defendant,

PHILLIP GOLIGHTLY,

FILED USDC FLND TL
JUL 7°20 pu


while in a Federal prison, namely, the Federal Correctional Institution in
Tallahassee, did knowingly engage in a sexual act with K.D., who was in official
detention and under the custodial, supervisory, and disciplinary authority of
PHILLIP GOLIGHTLY, a correctional officer.

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2243(b).

A TRUE BILL:

Depests

1|1 p20

T

DATE |

Vl

LAWRENCE KEEFE
United States Attorney

Assistant Urfited States Attorney
Exhibit 32.2




Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of
Title 18 of the United States Code




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PharmAthene, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Charles A. Reinhart III,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.
            
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act2.
            
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
      Charles A. Reinhart IIICharles
      A. Reinhart IIIChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      13 , 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,270,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  205,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,476,038
<PP&E>                                      19,600,065
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,241,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,834,203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          152,296
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,834,203
<SALES>                                      2,306,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,479,904
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,329,053
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,076,798
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (925,947)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (925,947)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (925,947)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PICTURETEL'S
BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING OCTOBER 3, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q FILING
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          21,170
<SECURITIES>                                    51,864
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,876)
<INVENTORY>                                     35,425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,031
<PP&E>                                         212,737
<DEPRECIATION>                               (123,639)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,015
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         45
<COMMON>                                           405
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   309,395
<SALES>                                        240,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,969
<CGS>                                          164,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               151,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (65,671)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,698
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (68,369)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (68,369)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.83)


</TABLE>
```

[108th Congress Public Law 428]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ428.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 2432]]

Public Law 108-428
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To extend the liability indemnification regime for the commercial space 
    transportation industry. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2004 -  [H.R. 5245]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INDEMNIFICATION EXTENSION.

    Section 70113(f) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``December 31, 2004.'' and inserting ``December 31, 2009.''.

SEC. 2. STUDY.

    Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Transportation shall enter into an arrangement with a 
nonprofit entity for the conduct of an independent comprehensive study 
of the liability risk sharing regime in the United States for commercial 
space transportation under section 70113 of title 49, United States 
Code. To ensure that Congress has a full analysis of the liability risk 
sharing regime, the study shall assess methods by which the current 
system could be eliminated, including an estimate of the time required 
to implement each of the methods assessed. The study shall assess 
whether any alternative steps would be needed to maintain a viable and 
competitive United States space transportation industry if the current 
regime were eliminated. In conducting the assessment under this section, 
input from commercial space transportation insurance experts shall be 
sought. The study also shall examine liability risk sharing in other 
nations with commercial launch capability and evaluate the direct and 
indirect impact that ending this regime would have on the 
competitiveness of the United States commercial

[[Page 118 STAT. 2433]]

space launch industry in relation to foreign commercial launch providers 
and on United States assured access to space.

    Approved November 30, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5245:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Oct. 8, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
2006-0978.

#### Rowe v. Brunsman.

Ross App. No. 06CA2891, 2006-Ohio-1964. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
Exhibit 10.8.1


 


AMENDMENT TO PIER 1 IMPORTS, INC. STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


 


WHEREAS, the Pier 1 Imports, Inc. Stock Purchase Plan
(the “Plan”) was established in 1980 and was most recently amended and restated
on June 20, 2008; and


 


WHEREAS, on January 22, 2009, the Board of Directors
of the Company, upon recommendation of the Administrative Committee, approved a
resolution (i) to suspend Participant compensation deductions, Company
matching contributions and enrollment of new Participants under the Plan and (ii) to
suspend purchases of shares of Common Stock under the Plan, each to occur after
the last event in which Participant compensation deductions plus Company
matching contributions could be used to purchase shares of Common Stock within
the authorized aggregate amount for issuance under the Plan of 2,541,025 shares
of Common Stock;


 


NOW THEREFORE:


 


A.            Commencing as
of March 28, 2009 (the “Suspension Date”), Participant compensation
deductions, Company matching contributions, enrollment of new Participants and
purchases of shares of Common Stock under the Plan (excluding the purchase of
shares made in early April from the Participant and Company contributions
made prior to the Suspension Date) are suspended.


 


B.            The suspension
period (the “Suspension Period”) commences on the Suspension Date and will end if
and when a restated and amended Plan is approved by the Company’s shareholders.
During the Suspension Period, all aspects of the Plan other than the
suspensions effected pursuant to item A above will continue in full force and
effect.


 


C.            All terms used
in this Amendment, unless specifically defined herein, have the same meanings
attributed to them in the Plan. As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically
ratified and reaffirmed.


 


Signed
effective as of March 28, 2009.


 


 


	
   

  	
  Pier
  1 Imports, Inc.,

  
	
   

  	
  a
  Delaware corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Gregory
  S. Humenesky

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Executive
  Vice President

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  March       ,
  2009
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case Nos.: 3:96cr80-LAC-HTC

3:20cv5908-LAC-HTC

STEVEN ANTHONY GRAHAM,

Defendant.

______________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on November 9,

2020 (ECF No. 391). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 391) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant Steven Anthony Graham’s Motion under 28 U.S.C. ' 2255

to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (ECF No. 389) is SUMMARILY

Case Nos. 3:96cr80-LAC-HTC; 3:20cv5908-LAC-HTC

Case 3:96-cr-00080-LC-HTC Document 392 Filed 12/21/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

4. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close

this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of December, 2020.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case Nos. 3:96cr80-LAC-HTC; 3:20cv5908-LAC-HTC

Case 3:96-cr-00080-LC-HTC Document 392 Filed 12/21/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Driftwood  Ventures,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  November 14, 2006


/s/ Steven Chan
-------------------------------------------
Steven Chan, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 3201.81 Floor coverings (non-carpet). ( a ) *Definition.* Products, other than carpet products, that are designed for use as the top layer on a floor. Examples are bamboo, hardwood, and cork tiles.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 91 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than April 4, 2013, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased floor coverings (non-carpet). By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased floor coverings (non-carpet).
( d ) *Determining overlap with an EPA-designated recovered content product.* Qualifying products within this item may overlap with the EPA-designated recovered content product: Construction Products—floor tiles. USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information on the USDA Web site of qualifying biobased products about the intended uses of the product, information on whether or not the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether or not a qualifying biobased product overlaps with EPA-designated floor tile products and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing.
Note to paragraph ( d
):
Biobased floor coverings within this designated product category can compete with similar floor tile products with recycled content. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designated floor tile products containing recovered materials as products for which Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.17.
[77 FR 20289, Apr. 4, 2012]
#### McCOLLUM, Appellant, v. SALMON, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

September 28, 1906.)

Action by Alexander J. McCollum against William Salmon.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
#### § 4279.59 Environmental requirements.

The Agency is responsible for ensuring that the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (under 40 CFR part 1500) and related compliance actions, such as Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (under 36 CFR part 800) and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, are met and will complete the appropriate level of environmental review in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970, “Environmental Policies and Procedures,” or successor regulation. Because development of the loan application occurs simultaneously with development of the environmental review, applicants, including lenders and borrowers, must not take any actions or incur any obligations that would either limit the range of alternatives to be considered in the environmental review or that would have an adverse effect on the environment. Satisfactory completion of the environmental review process must occur prior to issuance of the Conditional Commitment to the lender.
#### Austin W. Bender, Jr. et al., as Executors of Austin W. Bender, Sr., Deceased, Respondents-Appellants, v. State of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

(Claim No. 42065.)

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts in accordance with the Memorandum, and as modified affirmed, with costs. New findings made and inconsistent findings reversed. Memorandum: The Trial Judge awarded $93,032 and interest for the direct taking, but found that there were no consequential or severance damages, and disallowed that portion of the claim. We disagree with that disallowance and find that the claimant suffered consequential damages in the amount of $17,413 and interest. We find as follows: Fair Market Value prior to appropriation: 73,438 square feet at $4.50 per square foot, $330,471; Fair Market Value after appropriation: 52,764 square feet at $4.17 per square foot, $220,026; Total Damage, $110,445; Less Direct Damage allowed, $93,032; Consequential Damages, $17,413. This last amount should be added to the award for the direct taking, making a total award of $110,445, plus interest. The highest and best available use to which the remainder, not appropriated, could have been put was substantially reduced by the appropriation. (Appeals from judgment of Court of Claims, for claimants on a claim for permanent appropriation.) Present—-Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lightwave Logic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James S. Marcelli, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 14, 2008



/s/ James S. Marcelli

James S. Marcelli,

Chief Executive Officer

Lightwave Logic, Inc.
Exhibit 10.8



 Exhibit 10.8 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 2007 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN 
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2007 EQUITY COMPENSATION
PLAN (this “First Amendment”) is effective as of February 26, 2009. 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and stockholders
of DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) on October 18, 2007; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XV of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the following amendment to the Plan, which, pursuant to that Article, is not contingent on the approval of the
Company’s stockholders; 
 1. Article I, Section 1.06 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:

 “Change in Control” means (i) a Person is or becomes an Acquiring Person; (ii) the consummation of a transaction that
results in the transfer to a Person of all or substantially all of the Company’s total assets on a consolidated basis, as reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements; (iii) the consummation of a merger, consolidation,
or statutory share exchange with a Person, regardless of whether the Company is intended to be the surviving or resulting entity after the merger, consolidation, or statutory share exchange, other than a transaction in which the holders of
the Company’s voting securities immediately prior to the transaction own securities representing at least 50% (fifty percent) of the voting securities of such surviving entity or its parent, immediately after the closing of such transaction;
(iv) the Continuing Directors cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board; (v) holders of the securities of the Company entitled to vote thereon approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the
sale or liquidation by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets (or, if such approval is not required by applicable law and is not solicited by the Company, the commencement of actions constituting such a plan or the
closing of such an agreement); or (vi) the Board adopts a resolution to the effect that, in its judgment, as a consequence of any one or more transactions or events or series of transactions or events, a Change in Control of the Company has
effectively occurred. The Board shall be entitled to exercise its sole and absolute discretion in exercising its judgment and in the adoption of such resolution, whether or not any such transaction(s) or event(s) might be deemed, individually or
collectively, to satisfy any of the criteria set forth in subparagraphs (i) through (v) above. 
 2. Unless specifically modified
herein, all other terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in effect.