alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of The State ofConnecticut and Capitol District Energy Center Cogeneration Associates ) ) ) ) ) ) Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8249 Modification No.3

Whereas, the Commissioner ofEnvironmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Capitol District Energy Center Cogeneration Associates CRespondent") having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8249 and all previous modification thereto, do now, by mutual agreement, further modify said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows: 1. All references to May 1, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits andNOx allowances to comply with the emissions limits ofSubsections 22a-174-22(d)(l) through 22a-174- 22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies ("Regulations") are hereby replaced with May 1, 20IO. 2. Any references to October 1st with respect to the date by which the Respondent shall estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits CDERCs") and/or allowances for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1, 2009. 3. Any references to May 31,2007 and May 31,2008 with respect to calculation and retirement ofnon-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31, 2009 and May 31, 2010. 4. All references to September 1,2008 with respect to the submission ofFuture Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September 1,2009. 5. No laterthan May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8249 and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent shall comply with the requirements ofSections 22a-174-22(d)(l) and 22a-174- 22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations. 6. All otherterms and conditions ofTrading Agreement and OrderNo. 8249, as modified, shall remain in effect.

(Printed on Recycled Paper) 79 Elm Street • Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/dep All Equal Opportunity EmployerCapitol DistrictEnergy Center Cogeneration Associates 2 Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8249 ModificationNO.3
The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement and Order without further notice. Capitol DistrictEnergy Center Cogeneration Associates Signature:

# ~4 

# L;". Name: 

## /"Za:."j [. 

# 6.,.,:(' Title: 

### !CwT ;tt,><-A

## J '-c Date: 

## <f- 1"3 - /;/9
Issued as a modification ofa Trading Agreement and Order. 

# A.4 G Ro

### ~------'-==-- Di ctor Engineering and EnforcementDivision Bureau ofAir Management Date

. "" -t-
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Arrow Resources Development, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Peter J. Frugone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | i. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|                       
|/s/ Peter J. Frugone   
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 16, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION 

ADA A. GONZALEZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 4:19cv507-MW/CAS 

U. S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, etc. 

/Defendants. 

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 5. Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by 

the parties, 

IT IS ORDERED: 

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s opinion. 

The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “This case is DISMISSED for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction.” The Clerk shall also close the file. 

SO ORDERED on December 9, 2019. 

s/ MARK E. WALKER 

Chief United States District Judge
§ 3550.100 OMB control number. The information collection requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and have been assigned OMB control number 0575-0172. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to vary from 5 minutes to 3 hours per response, with an average of 11 ⁄ 2 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. [61 FR 59779, Nov. 22, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 78330, Dec. 24, 2002]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE AND TALLAHASSEE DIVISIONS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:94cr1009

CLAUDE DUBOC,

Defendant.

______________________________/

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 4:98cr46-RH

CLAUDE DUBOC,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER ADVANCING THE DEADLINE FOR THE

GOVERNMENT TO RESPOND TO THE MOTION

FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE

The deadline for the government to respond to the motion for compassionate 

release, ECF No. 1204 in Case No. 1:94cr1009 and ECF No. 461 in Case No. 

Case 1:94-cr-01009-MP-GRJ Document 1205 Filed 05/12/20 Page 1 of 2
4:98cr46-RH, is advanced to May 20, 2020. 

SO ORDERED on May 12, 2020.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 1:94-cr-01009-MP-GRJ Document 1205 Filed 05/12/20 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000755465
<NAME>                        SANDATA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                   1               
<CURRENCY>                     $               
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAY-31-1999       
<PERIOD-START>                  JUN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                    AUG-31-1998       
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1       
<CASH>                          493,938               
<SECURITIES>                    0          
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,425,852               
<ALLOWANCES>                    445,472               
<INVENTORY>                     11,996               
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,681,192               
<PP&E>                          13,240,116               
<DEPRECIATION>                  6,742,536               
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  9,902,198               
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,937,092               
<BONDS>                         0               
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0               
<PREFERRED>                     0               
<COMMON>                        3,169               
<OTHER-SE>                      4,257,243               
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    9,902,198              
<SALES>                         3,223,510               
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                3,501,236               
<CGS>                           0               
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   3,450,011               
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0               
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0               
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              5,730               
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 45,495               
<INCOME-TAX>                    16,287               
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             29,208               
<DISCONTINUED>                  0               
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0               
<CHANGES>                       0               
<NET-INCOME>                    29,208               
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .01               
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .01               
        


</TABLE>
#### §§ 4279.62-4279.70 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2502 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2502

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the energy credit 
                for certain property under construction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2013

  Mr. Thompson of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the energy credit 
                for certain property under construction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Renewable Energy Parity Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ENERGY CREDIT FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY UNDER 
              CONSTRUCTION.

    (a) Solar Energy Property.--Paragraphs (2)(A)(i)(II) and (3)(A)(ii) 
of section 48(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are each amended 
by striking ``periods ending'' and inserting ``property the 
construction of which begins''.
    (b) Qualified Fuel Cell Property.--Section 48(c)(1)(D) of such Code 
is amended by striking ``for any period after December 31, 2016'' and 
inserting ``the construction of which does not begin before January 1, 
2017''.
    (c) Qualified Microturbine Property.--Section 48(c)(2)(D) of such 
Code is amended by striking ``for any period after December 31, 2016'' 
and inserting ``the construction of which does not begin before January 
1, 2017''.
    (d) Combined Heat and Power System Property.--Section 
48(c)(3)(A)(iv) of such Code is amended by striking ``which is placed 
in service'' and inserting ``construction of which begins''.
    (e) Qualified Small Wind Energy Property.--Section 48(c)(4)(C) of 
such Code is amended by striking ``for any period after December 31, 
2016'' and inserting ``the construction of which does not begin before 
January 1, 2017''.
    (f) Thermal Energy Property.--Section 48(a)(3)(A)(vii) of such Code 
is amended by striking ``periods ending'' and inserting ``property the 
construction of which begins''.
    (g) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2225 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2225

 To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of entries of certain 
                        manufacturing equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2006

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of entries of certain 
                        manufacturing equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENTRY OF CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, the Bureau of 
Customs and Border Protection of the Department of Homeland Security 
shall, not later than 90 days after the receipt of the request 
described in subsection (b), liquidate or reliquidate as free of duty 
the entry described in subsection (d).
    (b) Request.--Liquidation or reliquidation may be made under 
subsection (a) with respect to an entry described in subsection (d) 
only if a request therefor is filed with the Bureau of Customs and 
Border Protection not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Refund of Amounts Owed.--Any amounts owed by the United States 
pursuant to the liquidation or reliquidation of the entry described in 
subsection (d) (including interest from the date of entry) shall be 
refunded not later than 90 days after the date of such liquidation or 
reliquidation.
    (d) Entry.--The entry referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:

 
 
 
  669 01774563....................  February 9, 2002
 

                                 <all>
```
06844.144 RACE TO TH E TOP EARLY LEARNING CHALLENGE MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH

1 **Response to comment from Yasmina Vinci, National Head Start Association** The Department thanks Yasmina Vinci , Executive Director of the National Head Start Association , for her comments. The comments expressed concerns about potentially limited utility of the study to the field due to the following factors:

 Correlating TQRIS ratings with KEA scores would not paint an accurate picture of how children’s outcomes arise as a result of complex interactions between experiences and environments ;
 Results of the study would not be generalizable to states beyond the 2 or 3 included in the analysis; and
 Kindergarten Entry Assessment s are not designed to validate TQRIS and using them for this purpose in this study may elicit high

- stakes interpretations of the relationship between TQRIS and child outcomes. We acknowledge that there are limitations to the study design but would like to highlight three strategies that the study team is i mplementing to ensure that results of the study can be useful to the field. First, this study is not an evaluation of TQRIS and will not be presented as such. If conducted, the study’s analyses will be state

- specific
. Recognizing that TQRIS are constantly evolving, as the commenter notes, the study is intended for formative (not evaluative) purposes. It is meant to provide information that RTT
- ELC and other states could use to further develop, implement, and refine their rating systems. Second , prior to u ndertaking the correlational analysis, the study team is assessing the feasibility of mov ing forward. This assessment includes collection of detailed information , through interviews with state administrators and reviews of state documents, about states’ KEAs, including their validity, the developmental domains covered, and timing of assessments and exclusion policies. These factors will all be considered in selecting states for the correlational study. Third, the report for the study will clearly state the analyses’ limitations and provide information beyond findings from analyses of the association between TQRIS ratings and student outcomes by state
. Specifically, the report will describe the distribution of overall TQRIS ratings and (if data are available) the component

- level ratings for the programs included in the analysis in each state, the demographic characteristics of the children who attended these programs, and the children’s kindergarten entry assessment outcomes. These descripti ve statistics will provide useful information about the construction of each state’s TQRIS. For example, i f the rating system fails to differentiate among programs because most programs receive the same rating, the ratings will not be associated with child outcomes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997             SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-30-1997             SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997             JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          12,372                  12,372
<SECURITIES>                                    13,785                  13,785
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,004                  12,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (476)                   (476)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,684                   4,684
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,454                  46,454
<PP&E>                                          10,788                  10,788
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (6,656)                 (6,656)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,154                  57,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,559                  14,559
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            85                      85
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,290                  42,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,154                  57,154
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,429                  43,093
<CGS>                                            2,771                   8,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,263                   9,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,267                  30,818
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,751)                  3,732
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,407)                  1,386
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,344)                  2,346
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,344)                  2,346
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.28)                   0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.28)                   0.26
        

</TABLE>
(April 30, 1980)

#### In the Matter of John A Gunderson, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Third Judicial Department, Petitioner.

Respondent was admitted to the Bar by this court on August 1, 1973. In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct, petitioner moves to confirm in part and to disaffirm in part the report of the Judge to whom the issues were referred. Respondent cross-moves to confirm the findings favorable to him and to disaffirm those which are unfavorable. Preliminarily, we note that the Hearing Judge ruled that petitioner is required to establish a. charge of professional misconduct by "clear and convincing” evidence. We take this occasion to reiterate that the questions involved in a disciplinary proceeding are to be determined upon a fair preponderance of the evidence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom (see *Matter of Feola,*37 AD2d 789). The petition contains three charges of professional misconduct. After carefully reviewing the evidence, we conclude that the record supports the findings and conclusion of the Hearing Judge that respondent attempted to steal a pewter porringer from a museum in New Haven, Connecticut, as alleged in Charge No. 1. Accordingly, petitioner’s motion to confirm the report of the Hearing Judge, insofar as it sustained Charge No. 1, is granted and respondent is suspended forthwith from the practice of law pending the further order of this court. As to Charges Nos. 2 and 3, we are of the opinion that they should be remitted to the Hearing Judge for the taking of such further evidence as may be presented by the parties, with the Hearing Judge to thereafter report thereon. Respondent suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor at law until the further order of the court and Charges Nos. 2 and 3 remitted to the Hearing Judge for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KEVIN EDWARDS,

A# 075–002–549,

Petitioner,

v. 4:20cv350–WS/MAF

WILLIAM P. BARR, et al.,

Respondents.

 

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 11) docketed October 14, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus be granted. No objections to the

report and recommendation have been filed. 

The court having reviewed the report and recommendation, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 11) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. Petitioner’s petition (ECF No. 1) for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED.

Case 4:20-cv-00350-WS-MAF Document 12 Filed 11/17/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. Petitioner shall be immediately released from custody upon conditions of

supervision pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(3).

4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “Kevin Edwards’s petition for writ

of habeas corpus is granted.”

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of November , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00350-WS-MAF Document 12 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 3565.50 OMB control number.

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no party is required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0575-0174.