alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:97cr44-RH

JOHANN ROSHE WOLMARANS,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER DENYING CORAM NOBIS PETITION

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 131). No objections have been filed, but the

defendant has submitted a letter seeking the magistrate judge’s disqualification. A

separate order treated the letter as a motion to disqualify the magistrate judge and

denied the motion. In order to give the defendant the benefit of every doubt, I also

treat the letter as an objection to the report and recommendation, and I have

considered de novo the issues raised in the letter, at least to the extent they are

comprehensible. The defendant plainly is entitled to no relief. Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:97cr44-RH

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The motion for writ of error coram nobis (document 130) is DENIED

with prejudice. The clerk must close the file. 

SO ORDERED on October 6, 2009.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
§ 250.67 Charitable institutions. ( a ) *Distribution to charitable institutions.* The Department provides donated foods to distributing agencies for distribution to charitable institutions, as defined in this part. A charitable institution must have a signed agreement with the distributing agency in order to receive donated foods, in accordance with § 250.12(b). However, the following organizations may not receive donated foods as charitable institutions: ( 1 ) Schools, summer camps, service institutions, and child and adult care institutions that participate in child nutrition programs or as commodity schools; and
( 2 ) Adult correctional institutions that do not conduct rehabilitation programs for a majority of inmates.
( b ) *Types of charitable institutions.* Some types of charitable institutions that may receive donated foods, if they meet the requirements of this section, include: ( 1 ) Hospitals or retirement homes;
( 2 ) Emergency shelters, soup kitchens, or emergency kitchens;
( 3 ) Elderly nutrition projects or adult day care centers;
( 4 ) Schools, summer camps, service institutions, and child care institutions that do not participate in child nutrition programs; and
( 5 ) Adult correctional institutions that conduct rehabilitation programs for a majority of inmates.
( c ) *Determining service to predominantly needy persons.* To determine if a charitable institution serves predominantly needy persons, the distributing agency must use: ( 1 ) Socioeconomic data of the area in which the organization is located, or of the clientele served by the organization;
( 2 ) Data from other public or private social service agencies, or from State advisory boards, such as those established in accordance with 7 CFR 251.4(h)(4); or
( 3 ) Other similar data.
( d ) *Types and quantities of donated foods distributed.* A charitable institution may receive donated foods under Section 4(a), Section 32, Section 416, or Section 709, as available. The distributing agency must distribute donated foods to charitable institutions based on the quantities that each may effectively utilize without waste, and the total quantities available for distribution to such institutions.
( e ) *Contracts with food service management companies.* A charitable institution may use donated foods in a contract with a food service management company. The contract must ensure that all donated foods received for use by the charitable institution in a fiscal year are used in the charitable institution's food service. However, the charitable institution is not subject to the other requirements in subpart D of this part relating to the use of donated foods under such contracts.
[73 FR 46184, Aug. 8, 2008]
§ 4279.290 Requirements after Project construction. Once the Project has been constructed, the Lender must meet the requirements specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. ( a ) Provide the Agency annual reports from the Borrower commencing the first full calendar year following the year in which Project construction was completed and continuing for the life of the guaranteed loan. The Borrower's reports will include, but not be limited to, the information specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (8), as applicable, of this section. ( 1 ) The actual amount of Advanced Biofuels, Biobased Products including Renewable Chemicals, and Byproducts produced.
( 2 ) If applicable, documentation that identified health or sanitation problems have been solved.
( 3 ) A summary of the cost of operating and maintaining the facility.
( 4 ) A description of any maintenance or operational problems associated with the facility.
( 5 ) Certification that the Project is and has been in compliance with all applicable State and Federal environmental laws and regulations.
( 6 ) The number of jobs created.
( 7 ) A description of the status of the Project's feedstock including, but not limited to, the feedstock being used, outstanding feedstock contracts, feedstock changes and interruptions, and quality of the feedstock.
( 8 ) The results of the annual inspections conducted under paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) For the life of the guaranteed loan, conduct annual inspections.
3.404 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.203-5, Covenant Against Contingent Fees, in all

solicitations and contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, other than those for

commercial products or commercial services (see parts 2 and 12).

Parent topic: Subpart 3.4 - Contingent Fees
§ 3201.106 Paint removers. ( a ) *Definition.* Products formulated to loosen and remove paint from painted surfaces.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 41 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than June 11, 2014, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased paint removers. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased paint removers.
[78 FR 34872, June 11, 2013]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2221 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain extruders used in 

the production of radial tires. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2006 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

extruders used in the production of radial tires. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN EXTRUDERS USED IN THE PRODUC4 TION OF RADIAL TIRES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.84.85 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain manufacturing equipment) is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•S 2221 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
§ 4279.278 Loan approval and obligating funds. ( a ) Applications for loan guarantees may be approved as their Phase 2 applications are completed and approved. If an application has been selected for phase 2, but has not been approved because additional information is needed, the Agency will notify, in writing, the Lender of what information is needed, including a timeframe for the Lender to provide the information. If the Lender does not provide the information within the specified timeframe, the Agency will remove the application from further consideration and will so notify the Lender in writing.
( b ) Upon approval of a loan guarantee application, the Agency will issue a Conditional Commitment to the Lender containing conditions under which a Loan Note Guarantee will be issued. The Agency will not issue a Conditional Commitment until the Agency has satisfactorily completed a Civil Rights Impact Analysis. The Conditional Commitment becomes null and void unless the conditions are accepted by the Lender and Borrower within 60 days from the date of issuance by USDA. If the conditions are not met or the Loan Note Guarantee is not issued by the Conditional Commitment expiration date, the Agency may extend the Conditional Commitment expiration date when requested by the Lender and only if there has been no Material Adverse Change in the Borrower's or Borrowers' financial condition since issuance of the Conditional Commitment.
( c ) The Lender and Borrower may request changes to the Conditional Commitment. The Agency may negotiate with the Lender and the Borrower regarding any proposed changes to the Conditional Commitment. Any changes to the Conditional Commitment must be documented by written amendment to the Conditional Commitment. The changes must be for Good Cause and the Agency may deny, solely at is discretion, changes to the Conditional Commitment even if the change is otherwise in compliance with this subpart.
( d ) The Borrower must comply with all Federal requirements then in effect for receiving Federal assistance.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 13, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 13, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0291. BRANDON SHANDREA BATTS v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2012F12395
#### § 301.85-9 Movement of live golden nematodes.

Regulations requiring a permit for and otherwise governing the movement of live golden nematodes in interstate or foreign commerce are contained in the Federal Plant Pest Regulations in part 330 of this chapter. Applications for permits for the movement of the pest may be made to the Deputy Administrator.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TERRANCE D. DAVISON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5627-MCR/MAF

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

 /

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. 

Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 10. The parties have been furnished a copy of the 

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file 

objections pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of 

all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 10, is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order. 

Case 3:20-cv-05627-MCR-MAF Document 12 Filed 03/15/21 Page 1 of 2
2. The § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is 

DISMISSED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED and leave to appeal in forma 

pauperis is also DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of March 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05627-MCR-MAF Document 12 Filed 03/15/21 Page 2 of 2
# 9.105 Procedures.

- 9.105-1 Obtaining information. 
- 9.105-2 Determinations and documentation. 
- 9.105-3 Disclosure of preaward information. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 9.1 - Responsible Prospective Contractors
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Richard Moore, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Fox Petroleum Inc.
      for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Fox Petroleum Inc.                                                                                

Dated: January 22, 2008

*/s/ Richard Moore*

Richard Moore
  President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
  (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Fox Petroleum
Inc. and will be retained by Fox Petroleum Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### Orenstein Snitow Sutak & Pollack, P. C., Appellant, v William Chazen et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 29, 1979, reversed, so far as appealed from, on the law, and plaintiff-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing defendants-respondents’ counterclaims granted, with costs and with disbursements. The suit is for fees for legal services rendered by plaintiff professional corporation. Counterclaims are asserted for breach of contract, negligent malpractice, and misrepresentation. No details in any of these categories are set forth in opposition to the motion, and Special Term explains denial of the motion: "facts essential to justify opposition to the motion are exclusively within the knowledge and control of plaintiff.” This does not appear from the recital in defendants’ papers. There are many conclusory allegations, stated in broad generalities, lacking details in respect of the counterclaims. Nor is there any indication that defendants’ lack of knowledge as to these claims will be improved by discovery. Particularly as to alleged malpractice, the affidavit states that this charge is based on the opinion of "some other attorney,” who is not named. Indeed, far from being ignorant of the matters, the affiant stated that "other instances of malpractice [are omitted] for the sake of brevity.” Nothing having been presented to indicate existence of an issue to be tried, the motion should have been granted. (See *Capelin Assoc, v Globe Mfg. Corp.,*34 NY2d 338, 342.) Concur—Birns, J. P., Fein, Sullivan, Markewich and Lynch, JJ.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. Case No. 3:99cr77/LAC

TYRELL PLAIR,

Defendant.

________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated April 19, 2013. (Doc. 159). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have

made a de novo determination of the objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed

objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 151)

is SUMMARILY DISMISSED. 

3. Defendant’s motion (doc. 158) is DENIED as moot.
Page 2 of 2

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10 day of May, 2013.

th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1491Q-13-PI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 

### ~~~O



## -Mc3)_ IDocket No. FAA *****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-140-AD; 

# \i,'l.~~

;;;z.OiO-0Ci,-07 Amendment 39

## Y ; AD ~-** -**] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model 340-500 and -600 Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT). ACT10N: Final rule; request forcomments. SU1\1MARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products lis above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct anunsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: Following successive EeAM [electronic centralized aircraft monitoring] warnings during the approach phase,just after the landing gear extension sequence and an uneventful landing, the maintenance inspection on an Airbus A340 has revealed an hydraulic leak that was caused by the failure ofthe Yellow high pressure (HP) hydraulic pipe supplying the back-up Nose Wheel Steering (NWS) which runs along the lower part ofthe avionic bay from frame 17to frame 20. This leak resulted in the loss ofthe Yellow hydraulic system and contamination ofthe avionics bay with sprayed hydraulic fluid. This condition, ifnot detected and corrected, could result in an ingestion ofhydraulic fluid inthe electrical connectors, which could generate an arcing phenomenon and, ifsufficient energy isprovided by the arcing, lead to anignition source, which would be anunsafe condition. O)<CIJRRENCI;S ROlJTING SYMlIOJ ••

UTn:G5
#### § 4280.18 [Reserved]
#### §§ 3560.75-3560.99 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.1200 Leverage commitment to a RBIC—application procedure, amount, and term. ( a ) *General.* Under the provisions in §§ 4290.1200 through 4290.1240, you may apply for the Agency's conditional commitment to reserve a specific amount of Leverage and type of Debenture (standard or discounted) for your future use. You may then apply to draw down Leverage against the commitment.
( b ) *Applying for a Leverage commitment.* The Agency will notify you when requests for Leverage commitments are being accepted, and upon receipt of your request, will send you a complete application package.
( c ) *Limitations on the amount of a Leverage commitment.* The amount of a Leverage commitment must be a multiple of $5,000. The Agency in its discretion may determine a minimum dollar amount for Leverage commitments. Any such minimum amounts will be published in Notices in the Federal Register from time to time.
( d ) *Term of Leverage commitment.* Your Leverage commitment will automatically lapse on the expiration date stated in the commitment letter issued to you by the Agency. The Agency's Leverage commitment will be included in the Participation Agreement at the time of your licensing as a RBIC, under § 4290.390.
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:99cr10LAC

DINO M. GENTILE

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on February 15, 2007

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 2/12/2007 Doc.# 101

RESPONSES:

BY GOVERNMENT on 2/8/2007 Doc.# 100

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 21st day of

February, 2007, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) The proper avenue for relief is the filing of a second or successive motion

to vacate under section 2255, which requires pre-authorization from the Eleventh

Circuit. See Gonzalez v. Secretary for Dept. of Corrections, 366 F.3d 1253,

1277 (11th Cir. 2004).

(c) The Government’s motion to dismiss Defendant’s motion (doc. 100) is DENIED

as moot in light of the instant Order. 

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:99-cr-00010-LC-MD Document 102 Filed 02/21/07 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 241 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 241

To amend section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 to provide that 
  funds received as universal service contributions and the universal 
 service support programs established pursuant to that section are not 
subject to certain provisions of title 31, United States Code, commonly 
                    known as the Antideficiency Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2005

   Ms. Snowe (for herself and Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Stevens, and Mr. 
    Inouye) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 to provide that 
  funds received as universal service contributions and the universal 
 service support programs established pursuant to that section are not 
subject to certain provisions of title 31, United States Code, commonly 
                    known as the Antideficiency Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934.

    Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(m) Application of Antideficiency Act.--Section 1341 and 
subchapter II of chapter 15 of title 31, United States Code, do not 
apply--
            ``(1) to any amount collected or received as Federal 
        universal service contributions required by this section, 
        including any interest earned on such contributions; nor
            ``(2) to the expenditure or obligation of amounts 
        attributable to such contributions for universal service 
        support programs established pursuant to this section.''.
                               <all>D23/
```