alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 372.7 Planning and decision points and public involvement. ( a ) *Major planning and decisions points.* The NEPA process will be fully coordinated with APHIS planning in cooperation with program personnel. Specific decision points or milestones will be identified and communicated to the public and others in a notice of intent and in the context of the public scoping process.
( b ) *Public involvement.* There will be an early and open process for determining the scope of issues to be addressed in the environmental impact statement process. ( 1 ) A notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement will be published in the Federal Register as soon as it is determined that a proposed major Federal action has the potential to affect significantly the quality of the human environment. The notice may include a preliminary scope of environmental study. All public and other involvement in APHIS' environmental impact statement process, including the scoping process, commenting on draft documents, and participation in the preparation of any supplemental documents, will be pursuant to CEQ's implementing regulations.
( 2 ) Opportunities for public involvement in the environmental assessment process will be announced in the same fashion as the availability of environmental assessments and findings of no significant impact.
( 3 ) Notification of the availability of environmental assessments and findings of no significant impact for proposed activities will be published in the Federal Register, unless it is determined that the effects of the action are primarily of regional or local concern. Where the effects of the action are primarily of regional or local concern, notice will normally be provided through publication in a local or area newspaper of general circulation and/or the procedures implementing Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs.”
( 4 ) All environmental documents and comments received will be made available to the public via *Regulations.gov*.
[60 FR 6002, Feb. 1, 1995, Redesignated and amended at 83 FR 24011, May 24, 2018]
#### In the Matter of Burns International Security Services, Inc., Petitioner, v Mario Cuomo, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents dated June 1, 1977, which found that petitioner demonstrated untrustworthiness, pursuant to section 79 of the General Business Law, and which ordered that its private investigator license be suspended for a period of one month or that $450 be paid to respondents. Petition granted, determination annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, charge dismissed and the fine paid by the petitioner is ordered remitted. There is no substantial evidence in the record to sustain respondents’ findings and conclusion that petitioner demonstrated untrustworthiness. Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
#### § 4288.106 Forms, regulations, and instructions.

Copies of all forms, regulations, instructions, and other materials related to this Program may be obtained from the USDA Rural Development State Office, Rural Energy Coordinator and the USDA Rural Development website at *https://www.rd.usda.gov/.*

[84 FR 71302, Dec. 27, 2019]
19–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 2d Session 107–739

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 122, MAKING FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2003

OCTOBER 10, 2002.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 580]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 580, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of House Joint Resolution 122, making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal 

year 2003, and for other purposes, under a closed rule. The rule 

provides one hour of debate in the House equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

joint resolution. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR FISCAL QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<CASH>                              207,693
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     2,054,445
<ALLOWANCES>                         16,570      
<INVENTORY>                         808,046
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  3,272,452
<PP&E>                            5,861,738
<DEPRECIATION>                    2,710,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   15,423,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             9,863,235
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                         140,119
<COMMON>                          1,131,255
<OTHER-SE>                        4,039,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     15,423,416
<SALES>                           4,391,991
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  4,391,991
<CGS>                             3,456,529
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     3,456,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,818,558
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  105,965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (1,989,061)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,989,061)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,989,061)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.19)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM PICTURETEL
CORPORATION'S BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 29,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          43,077
<SECURITIES>                                    30,802
<RECEIVABLES>                                  129,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,858)
<INVENTORY>                                     62,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               280,569
<PP&E>                                         114,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                (69,004)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 351,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,624
<BONDS>                                          4,114
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           342
<OTHER-SE>                                     261,037
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   351,117
<SALES>                                        230,460
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               230,460
<CGS>                                          125,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  125,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     85
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 55
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        55
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
§ 3430.1007 Planning activities. ( a ) *Required plan.* The Centers and Subcenter shall jointly develop and submit to NIFA for approval a plan for addressing the bioenergy, biomass, and bioproducts research priorities of the Department and the other appropriate Federal agencies at the State and regional levels. Proposals submitted to the Sun Grant Program must be sufficiently detailed and of high enough quality and demonstrate adequate evidence of collaboration to meet this requirement. Funds available for administrative costs (see § 3430.1005(b)) may be used to meet this requirement.
( b ) [Reserved]
[75 FR 70580, Nov. 18, 2010, as amended at 81 FR 6418, Feb. 8, 2016]
## Appliances & Commercial Equipment Standards: Residential Furnaces and Boilers Adva... Page 1 of 1

Energy Eiciency and Rene 

## ble Energy EERE Home

Appliances Home About Standards Laws & Regulations EPACT 2005 Test Procedures Information Resources Notices & Rules Schedule Setting Public Workshops & Hearings Search Help ^ More Search Options EERE Information Center 

### Residential Furnaces and B oilers Advance N otice of Proposed Rule aking (A PR) Following the Framework Document, the Department of Energy is now publishing its Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR). The ANOPR is the first stage of the overall standards rulemaking process. This will be followed by a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) and a final rule. At the ANOPR stage, the Department carries out several analyses, including the Engineering Analysis, the Life-Cycle Cost Analysis, and the National Impact Analysis. Stakeholders are invited to review the ANOPR documents and the analytical tools, participate in webcasts, attend the public meetings, and submit comments on the Department's analysis. State Petitions Useful Links Commercial Equipment Residential Products Battery Chargers & External Power Supplies Central Air Conditioners & Heat Pumps Clothes Dryers Clothes Washers Cooking Products Dehumidifiers Dishwashers Furna-:e. Boiler: Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts Fluorescent & Incandescent Lamps Plumbing Products Pool Heaters Refrigerators & Freezers Room Air Conditioners Small Duct, High Velocity Air Conditioners Water Heaters Some of the following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Acrobat Reader. • ANOPR Internet Webcast • ANOPR PubIicMeeting • ANOPR Federal Register Notice (PDF 270 KB) o ANOPR Technical Support Document o ANOPR Analytical Tools 

### How to Submit Comments You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or by courier. Wherever possible, comments in the electronic format should carry the electronic signature of the author. Absent an electronic signature, comments submitted electronically must be followed and authenticated by submitting the signed original paper document. Email: ResidentialFBANOPRComments(o)ee.doe.gov Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards -Jones, U

. S. Department of Energy , Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington , DC 20585-0121 Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program, Room 1J-018, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone: 202-586-2945 Comments should clearly identify the Docket number, which is EERM/STD - 01-350. The deadline for submitting comments is November 10, 2004. Printable Version Webmaster I Security & Privacy I Building Technologies Program Home I EERE Home U.S. Department of Energy Content Last Updated: 08/03/2006 Ji



## http://eere.energy. gov/buildings/appliance_standards/res idential/furnace_boiler_anopr.html 4/18/2007
#### § 42.109 Sampling plans for normal condition of container inspection, Tables I and I-A.

Table I—Single Sampling Plans for Normal Condition of Container Inspection

| Code | Lot size ranges— Number of containers in lot | Type of Plan | Acceptable quality levels | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Origin Inspection | | | | | | | Other Than Origin Inspection | | | | | |
| Sample size | 0.25 | | 1.5 | | 6.5 | | 0.25 | | 2.5 | | 10.0 | |
| Ac | Re | Ac | Re | Ac | Re | Ac | Re | Ac | Re | Ac | Re |
| CA | 6,000 or less | Single | 84 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 13 | 14 |
| CB | 6,001-12,000 | Single | 168 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 16 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 23 | 24 |
| CC | 12,001-36,000 | Single | 315 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 28 | 29 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 14 | 41 | 42 |
| CD | Over 36,000 | Single | 500 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 13 | 42 | 43 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 19 | 62 | 63 |
| CE | | Single | 800 | 4 | 5 | 18 | 19 | 64 | 65 | 4 | 5 | 27 | 28 | 95 | 96 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ac = Acceptance number. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Re = Rejection number. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER17SE13.004/ER17SE13.004_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER17SE13.004/ER17SE13.004_original_size.png)

[[78 FR 57035](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/78-FR-57035), Sept. 17, 2013]
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Citibank, N.A.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix
I, that Citibank, N.A. (or "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation
AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-
backed securities, automobile loan or lease-backed securities and student
loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the
Company provides the following servicing functions:  paying agent, securities
administration and trustee; or securities administration and paying agent;
or paying agent and trustee; or paying agent, collectively "Servicing
Functions." (the "Platform"), excluding servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i),
1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)
(ii) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) through 1122(d)(4)(xiv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with
respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31,
2006.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing
of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities
that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing
activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company
processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities
in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were
limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the
Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not
designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or
subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve month ended
December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

                                         /s/ KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2007
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2577 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the definition 

of applicable large employer for purposes of the employer mandate in 

the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2013 

Mr. MESSER (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the definition of applicable large employer for purposes 

of the employer mandate in the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Job 

5 Protection Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF APPLICABLE LARGE EMPLOYER. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4980H(c) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2577 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking ‘‘at least 

2 50’’ and inserting ‘‘at least 100’’; and 

3 (2) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ‘‘50’’ each 

4 place it occurs and inserting ‘‘100’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the 

7 amendments made by section 1513 of the Patient Protec8 tion and Affordable Care Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:96-cr-00020-MP-AK

JOHN CALVIN EVERETT,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 478, Motion for Certificate of Appealability by

John Calvin Everett and doc. 481, a motion to reconsider the order denying his motion to

proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 477). For the reasons given in the previous orders denying Mr.

Everett’s many previous collateral attacks on his conviction and sentence, the motions are

denied. Additionally, with regard to allowing Mr. Everett to pay the filing fee in monthly

installments, such an approach would allow Mr. Everett an end run around the frivolousness

check in Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4) and is not appropriate in this case. Accordingly it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The motion for Certificate of Appealability (doc. 478) is denied, and the motion to

reconsider (doc. 481) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of January, 2008

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:96-cr-00020-MW-GRJ Document 484 Filed 01/02/08 Page 1 of 1
9.103 Policy.       (a)                    						            Purchases shall be made from, and contracts shall be awarded to, responsible prospective contractors only.                                          (b)                    						            No purchase or award shall be made unless the contracting officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. In the absence of information clearly indicating that the prospective contractor is responsible, the contracting officer shall make a determination of nonresponsibility. If the prospective contractor is a small business concern, the contracting officer shall comply with subpart  19.6, Certificates of Competency and Determinations of Responsibility. (If Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C.637) applies, see subpart  19.8.)                                          (c)                    						            The award of a contract to a supplier based on lowest evaluated price alone can be false economy if there is subsequent default, late deliveries, or other unsatisfactory performance resulting in additional contractual or administrative costs. While it is important that Government purchases be made at the lowest price, this does not require an award to a supplier solely because that supplier submits the lowest offer. A prospective contractor must affirmatively demonstrate its responsibility, including, when necessary, the responsibility of its proposed subcontractors.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 9.1 - Responsible Prospective Contractors
§ 3560.652 Prepayment and restrictive-use categories. ( a ) Loans with prepayment prohibitions include: ( 1 ) Initial section 515 loans made on or after December 15, 1989, and
( 2 ) Subsequent loans made on or after December 15, 1989, for additional rental units.
( b ) Loans without prepayment prohibitions but with restrictive-use provisions include: ( 1 ) All loans made after December 21, 1979, but prior to December 15, 1989;
( 2 ) Subsequent loans made on or after December 15, 1989, for purposes other than additional rental units; or
( 3 ) Loans subsequently restricted by servicing actions including transfers.
( c ) Loans without prepayment prohibitions or restrictive-use provisions include all loans made on or before December 21, 1979 or loans that had restrictive-use provisions that have expired. Such loans are eligible to receive incentives subject to the provisions of this subpart.
( d ) Loans may be prepaid if another loan or grant from the Agency imposes the same or more stringent restrictive-use provisions on the housing project covered by the loan being prepaid.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Zoo Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Form
10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August
14, 2009





/s/
      Mark SeremetMark
      Seremet
                President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)




Date:  August
14, 2009





/s/
      David FremedDavid
      FremedChief
      Financial Officer
                (Principal
      Financial Officer)
#### § 27.83 No fees for certain certificates.

No fee shall be collected for a new cotton class certificate issued in lieu of a prior certificate solely for the purpose of correcting clerical errors therein or for the purpose of substituting a new form applicable to outstanding certificates, or without an application therefor.