alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
mum OF 

Edward p. Horan " "'ANSPORTATiO N 

103 Pikemont Drive ' v/c f OPERATIONS 'i 

Wexford. PA 15090 ' " '' 

August 4. 201 

U.S. Department ot'Transportation Docket Operations - M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New .lersey Avenue. SE 

Wishington. DC 20590 

Rf. 14 CI'R 39 Docket No. FAA-2011-0639; Directorate Identifier 2011-CF,-016-AD 

To Whom it may concern: 

Alter careful review of the text of the proposed airworthiness directive published in the Federal Retiisier. (Volume 7b. 

No 120. dated Wednesday, .lune 22. 2011. pages 36395-36398) regarding the Piper P.A24 stabilator horn stress crack 

issue. I vould like to request that the applicability portion of the proposed AD be altered 

From: 

c) This .'\D applies to the following Piper Aircraft, inc. airplanes, certificated in an\ category: 

(1) Model PA-24. serial numbers (Sns) 24-1 through 24-3687; 

(2) Model PA-24-250. Sns 24-1. 24-103 throtigh 24-3687: and 

(3 ' Ivlodei PA-24-260. Sns 24-3642 and 24-4000 through 24-5034. 

Reason for Request: 

1) I he Int'. rnational Comanche Society (ICS) has. with the knowledge of the FAA. been pursuing an alternative 

solution \\hich consists of replacing the original Piper horn (P/N 20397-00) with a horn thai would be installed under a 

sufiplemeiital type certificate. An aircraft modified under this potential SIC wotild. ob\iousl>. not be able to coiiipiv 

with paragraph (f) of the proposed AD because the Piper S/B would not be applicable. 

2) On page 36396 of the previously referenced Federal-Register, the last paragraph .states that "there is no ser\ ice 

hisJory of this unsafe condition on the Models PA-24-400...Also. these models have a thicker torque lube, which 

reduce t lamp up forces; clamp up forces are a key factor of the stress corrosion cracking..." 

Discuss ons/Contemplations are underway of approaching the AD b_\ replacing the loniue tube with one with a thicker 

wall thickness. 

If either option is installed on one of the affected aircraft, the propo.sed applicabilit> change would clearlv issisl the 

ins'iector/meihanic in determining the stale of the AD with respect to a particular aircraft. 

Re ear 

Edward P. Horan 

A&P 2797220 lA 

\ 

To: 

c) This AD applies to the following Piper Aircraft. Inc. airplanes, certificated in an_\ category, equipped with a Piper | 

P/N 20397-00 stabilator liorn and a Piper P/N 20203-02 torque tube. 

(1) Model PA-24. serial numbers (Sns) 24-1 through 24-3687; t' 

(2) Model PA-24-250. Sns 24-1. 24-103 through 24-3687: and 

(3) Model PA-24-260. Sns 24-3642 and 24-4000 through 24-5034.
```
**Exhibit 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection  with the Annual  Report of Eldorado  Artesian  Springs,  Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Douglas
Larson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 USC SS.
1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

        /s/ Douglas Larson
        ------------------
        Chief Executive Officer

        Dated: June 29, 2005
```
###### Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear at 87 FR 80005, Dec. 29, 2022.

#### § 301.45-3 [Reserved]
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, EIGHTH 

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR 

ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 2019-CA-2558

MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE and

ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, 

husband and wife, 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC. and

JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, 

Defendants.

____________________________________/

DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS’

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

Defendants, ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC. and JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, by and 

through undersigned counsel, hereby file their Answer to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint

and Affirmative Defenses and, respectfully requesting a trial by jury of all disputed issues of 

fact, say: 

1. Admitted, for jurisdictional purposes only, the averment made in Paragraph 1. 

2. Admitted the allegations in Paragraphs 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 14, and 15.

3. Defendants are without knowledge as to the truth or veracity of those allegations made in

Paragraphs 2, 3, and 28. 

4. Defendants deny each and every, all and singular, the remaining allegations of the 

Second Amended Complaint.
FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Just before, and at the time and place, of the incident of which the Plaintiffs complain, 

Plaintiff, Romanus Sylvester Leonce, was himself guilty of negligence, which was the sole or 

contributing legal cause of the incident and his own professed resulting injuries and damages.

SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

The Plaintiffs’ claims herein, in accordance with Florida law, should be reduced by any 

and all collateral sources received by the Plaintiffs.

THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

To the extent that the Plaintiffs have failed to mitigate the damages complained of herein, 

Plaintiffs are barred from recovering those damages, which would not have occurred but for the 

failure of this mitigation.

FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Plaintiffs are subject to the threshold requirements of Florida’s No Fault Law before they

can recover any damages for claimed intangible and non-economic losses.

FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE and ROMANUS SYLVESTER 

LEONCE, failed to wear available and fully operational seatbelts—which failure produced or 

contributed substantially to producing said Plaintiffs’ injuries and resulting damages.

(Certificate of Service on Next Page)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished to Jack J. 

Fine, Esquire, Fine, Farlash & Parlapiano, P.A., 622 Northeast First Street, Gainesville, Florida 

32601, jfine@ffplaw.com and jduchaj@ffplaw.com, via Electronic Mail, in this 1st day of April, 

2020. 

FERNANDEZ TRIAL LAWYERS, P.A.

 /s/ John Moffitt Howell

ELLIS T. FERNANDEZ, III, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 371556

JOHN M. HOWELL, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 243027

CATHERINE V. ARPEN, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 124025

8780-200 Perimeter Park Court

Jacksonville, Florida 32216

(904) 398-8008 (Phone)

(904) 398-0332 (Fax)

Attorneys for Defendants

Primary Email: Pleadings@FernandezTL.com 

Secondary Email: Jhowell@FernandezTL.com

 KLang-Thorbs@FernandezTL.com
Executive Compensation Arrangements



 EXHIBIT 10.32 
  
 SALARY INFORMATION FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
  
 The table below provides information regarding the salary of each executive officer of Kosan Biosciences Incorporated (“Kosan”) as of March 15, 2005. All other
compensation arrangements between Kosan and each of its executive officers are referenced in the Exhibit Index to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 
  

				
	 Executive Officer

	  	Salary


	 Daniel V. Santi, M.D., Ph.D.
	  	$	425,000
	 Robert G. Johnson, Jr., M.D., Ph.D.
	  	$	350,000
	 Susan M. Kanaya
	  	$	292,000
	 Bruce E. MacMillan
	  	$	252,000
#### § 3601.2 Public inspection, copying, and indexing.

5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) requires that certain materials be made available for public inspection and copying and that a current index of these materials be published quarterly or otherwise be made available. Members of the public may request access to such materials maintained by NASS at the following office: Information Staff, ARS, REE, USDA, Room 1-2248, Mail Stop 5128, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705-5128; Telephone (301) 504-1640 or (301) 504-1655; TTY-VOICE (301) 504-1743. Office hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Information maintained in our electronic reading room can be accessed at *http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/foia/#Electronic.*
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO
      SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) by
      Sino Gas International Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”), I, Yuchuan Liu, hereby
      certify that:





1.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Registrant.




Dated:
                November 16, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Yuchuan LiuName:Yuchuan
                LiuTitle:  
                Chief Executive Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2312 

To exempt the natural aging process in the determination of the production 

period for distilled spirits under section 263A of the Internal Revenue 

Code of 1986. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2013 

Mr. BARR (for himself, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. YARMUTH, and Mr. MASSIE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To exempt the natural aging process in the determination 

of the production period for distilled spirits under section 

263A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aged Distilled Spirits 

5 Competitiveness Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2312 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF NATURAL AGING PROCESS IN DE2 TERMINATION OF PRODUCTION PERIOD FOR 

3 DISTILLED SPIRITS UNDER SECTION 263A. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 263A(f) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general exceptions) is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new para7 graph: 

8 ‘‘(5) EXEMPTION OF NATURAL AGING PROCESS

9 IN DETERMINATION OF PRODUCTION PERIOD FOR

10 DISTILLED SPIRITS.—For purposes of this sub11 section, the production period for distilled spirits 

12 shall be determined without regard to any period al13 located to the natural aging process.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 this section shall apply to production periods beginning 

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 21-1

THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC.  AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT AT DECEMBER 31, 2001

|Name                                              |  | Jurisdiction in
which organized
|------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Navigators Insurance Company                      |  | New York                       
|NIC Insurance Company                             |  | New York                       
|Navigators Management Company, Inc.               |  | New York                       
|Navigators Insurance Services of Texas, Inc.      |  | Texas                          
|Navigators California Insurance Services, Inc.    |  | California                     
|Navigators Insurance Services of Washington, Inc. |  | Washington                     
|Navigators Management (UK) Ltd.                   |  | United Kingdom                 
|Navigators Corporate Underwriters Ltd.            |  | United Kingdom                 
|Navigators Holdings (UK) Ltd.                     |  | United Kingdom                 
|Navigators Underwriting Agency Ltd.               |  | United Kingdom                 
|Millennium Underwriting Ltd.                      |  | United Kingdom                 
|Pennine Underwriting Limited                      |  | United Kingdom                 
|Somerset Asia Pacific Pty Ltd. (inactive)         |  | Australia                      
|Somerset Services Pte Ltd. (inactive)             |  | Singapore                      

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002







I,
Adam R. Cegielski, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of GoldMountain Exploration Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
quarter ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of GoldMountain Exploration
Corporation.





Date:
February 19, 2008





By: /s/ Adam R.
Cegielski


Adam R.
Cegielski,


Chief
Executive Officer and


Principal
Financial Officer
#### § 3560.400 OMB control number.

The information collection requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and have been assigned OMB control number 0575-0189. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to vary from 15 minutes to 18 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. A person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2306 

To amend the National Organ Transplant Act to clarify that kidney paired 

donation and kidney list donation do not involve the transfer of a human 

organ for valuable consideration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2006 

Mr. LEVIN (for himself, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. DORGAN, and Mr. BOND) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the National Organ Transplant Act to clarify 

that kidney paired donation and kidney list donation 

do not involve the transfer of a human organ for valuable 

consideration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Living Kidney Organ 

5 Donation Clarification Act’’. 
2 

•S 2306 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE NATIONAL ORGAN TRANS2 PLANT ACT. 

3 Section 301(a) of the National Organ Transplant Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 274e(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: ‘‘For purposes of this section, kidney paired do6 nation and kidney list donation shall not be considered to 

7 involve the transfer of a human organ for valuable consid8 eration.’’. 

Æ
#### § 29.3044 Offtype.

Tobacco of distinctly different characteristics which cannot be classified as Burley, Type 31 or 93. (See Rule 23.)

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 51721, Nov. 17, 1982. Redesignated and amended at 49 FR 16757, 16758, Apr. 20, 1984]
Exhibit
      32.2








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of APA Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce
      G. Blackey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
                15(d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
                Bruce G. BlackeyBruce
                G. BlackeyChief
                Financial Officer
MEMORANDUM

DATE: May 6, 2015

TO: Dockets EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602, EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0603, and EPA-HQOAR-2013-0495

FROM: Lora Strine

SUBJECT: Summary of Stakeholder Conference Call with RGGI States and EPA Staff

SUMMARY

Discussion of 111(d) Clean Power Plan

ATTENDEES

Mike Gordon, EPA Region 3

Lora Strine, EPA 

Shutsu Wong, EPA Region 1

Raymond Ford, EPA Region 2 

State Representative

CT Jaimeson Sinclair, Keri Enright-Kato, Eric Annes, Dino Pascua

DE Valerie Gray

ME Erle Townsend, John Brautigam, Marc Cone

MD George (Tad) S. Aburn Jr., Scott Zacharko, Luke Wisniewski, Diane Franks

MA Rachel Evans, William Space, Bill Lamkin

NH Joe Fontaine, Karla McManus

NY Jim Austin, Allison Rose, Anthony Belsito , Dave Coup, Lois New, Jon 

Binder

RI Frank Stevenson, Dena Gonsalves

VT Brian Woods, Megan O’Toole

RGGI, Inc. Lisa DeVito, Anna Ngai, Jiin Park, Nicole Singh
Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

ROBERT AMIS REYES, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5671/RV/EMT 

GAY LYNN REYES, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________/ 

ORDER

 The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on October 

21, 2020 (ECF No. 8). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that 

it should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 

 1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 8) 

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 

 2. This case is remanded to the County Court of the First Judicial Circuit 

in and for Okaloosa County, Florida. 

 3. The Clerk is directed to close the file. 

Case 3:20-cv-05671-RV-EMT Document 9 Filed 11/30/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 

Case No.: 3:20cv5671/RV/EMT 

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of November 2020. 

 /s/ Roger Vinson 

 ROGER VINSON 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05671-RV-EMT Document 9 Filed 11/30/20 Page 2 of 2
|  | Technology Transfer Network            Air Toxics Website             Contact Us |                     Print                     Version                     Search:                     EPA                     Home > Technology Transfer Network> Air                     Toxics Website > Air Toxics Strategy |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

||
||
#### RUBIN v. MAAS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 18, 1914.)

Negligence (§ 33*)—Use of Land—Care as to Trespasser.

Plaintiff, who, while descending some steps leading to a cellar to bring back her child, who was playing there, stepped into a hole in one of the steps and was injured, was a mere trespasser, and in the absence of even gratuitous permission by the lessee of the premises, he owed her no obligation whatever, and was not liable.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Negligence, Cent. Dig, §§ 45-47; Dec. Dig. § 33.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.

Action by Dora Rubin against Morris Maas. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Reversed, and new trial granted.

Argued June term, 1914, before SEABURY, BIJUR, and PAGE, JJ.

Abraham I. Spiro, of New York City, for appellant.

Robson & Simpson, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

*180BIJUR, J.

Defendant was the lessee of a building. Plaintiff, learning that her child was playing in the cellar of the building, descended some steps leading from the street to bring the child back. In doing so she stepped into a hole in one of the steps and was injured. As plaintiff was a mere trespasser, and as it was not shown that even gratuitous permission to enter on the premises had been given by the defendant, defendant owed her no obligation whatsoever. See Fox v. Warner, etc., Co., 204 N. Y. 240, 97 N. E. 497, 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 395, Ann. Cas. 1913C, 842. Under the circumstances of this case the recovery was unwarranted.

The attempt to sustain the, judgment because of the supposed violation of section 194 of the Code of City Ordinances must fail, because the record is devoid of any proof that the flight of stairs referred to comes within the terms of the ordinance.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.. All concur..
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

WAYNE WILLIAM TUCKER,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:19cv1713/RV/EMT

JULIE L. JONES, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________/

O R D E R

The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on May 11, 

2020 (ECF No. 22). The court provided Plaintiff a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded him an opportunity to file objections pursuant to 

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined the 

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

22) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s claims against Gilead Sciences, Inc. are DISMISSED 

without prejudice to Plaintiff’s bringing them in a separate civil action, pursuant to 

Rule 20 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Case 5:20-cv-00187-TKW-MJF Document 25 Filed 07/09/20 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No. 3:19cv1713/RV/EMT

3. Plaintiff’s claims against the remaining Defendants are DISMISSED

with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), because they are frivolous, 

fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief against 

a defendant who is immune from such relief, with the exception of the following 

claims:

a. Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims for declaratory relief and 

monetary damages against Centurion and Dr. Hosseini for their failure to provide 

Ensure supplement drinks (asserted in Claim Seven of the Second Amended 

Complaint); and

b. Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim for declaratory relief 

against Defendants Angela Gaskins and Brenda Patterson for their discontinuing the 

4,000-calorie prescription diet option (asserted in Claim Eight of the Second 

Amended Complaint).

4. This case is recommitted to a magistrate judge for further proceedings 

on ONLY the claims against Centurion, Dr. Hosseini, Angela Gaskins, and Brenda 

Patterson identified supra in paragraph 2, subparagraphs a. and b.

Case 5:20-cv-00187-TKW-MJF Document 25 Filed 07/09/20 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No. 3:19cv1713/RV/EMT

5. This case is TRANSFERRED to the court’s Panama City Division, 

pursuant to Local Rule 3.1(B)–(C).

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of July, 2020.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00187-TKW-MJF Document 25 Filed 07/09/20 Page 3 of 3