I

.-; HOLDING THE LINE

THE 5lst ENGINEER COMBAT BATTALION

AND THE BATTLE OF THE BULGE

; i DECEMBERl944-JANUARY 1945

bY

Ken Hechler

with a prologue and epilogue by

Barry W. Fowle

. Studies in Military Engineering

Number 4

OFFICE OF HISTORY

UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA

1988

Foreword

On 16 December 1944, when the 51st Engineer Combat

Battalion faced the Germans' last gasp effort to win the

war, it had been operating 30 sawmills in support of the

First United States Army. Within days the battalion was

spread over the Belgian countryside, defending roads,

bridges, and towns from the Nazi attempt to break through

to the Meuse River and to split the British and American

forces. The men set up roadblocks, using mines and

abatis; mined bridges and culverts; and defended river

crossings with machine guns, recoilless rifles, and

bazookas.

This narrative by Ken Hechler, a combat historian and

Infantry captain at the time, was drawn from numerous oral

history interviews of participants. Captain Hechler and

Technician Fourth Class Harvey R. George did the interviews shortly after the battles.

This volume is another in the Office of History's

series of Studies in Military Engineering. It describes

the 51st's successful defensive operations during a period

in the Battle of the Bulge. This unit's story is especially interesting because it identifies the specific

locations of all defenses, allowing the reader to follow

in detail the tactics of Engineer commanders.

PAT M. STEVENS, IV

Colonel, Corps of Engineers

Chief of Staff

iii
Acknowledgments

Ken Hechler's manuscript lay in the files for over 40

years, and some effort was required to make it

publishable. Kathy Richardson and Connie Potter edited

and proofed the manuscript, and Robert R. Weekes prepared

all the graphic art. Diane Arms, editor for the Office of

History, assisted with the cartographic research and

verification of the place names mentioned in the text.

Thanks also go to Center of Military History personnel

Howell C. Brewer, Jr., for locating the 1:100,000 base map

from which many of the maps were drawn, and Arthur S.

Hardyman, for his advice on map making.

iv


THE 5lstENGINEEFt COMBAT BATTALION

ANDTHEBATTLEOl?THEBULGE

DECEMBl3R 1944-JANUARY 1945

Prologue

bY

Barry W. Fowle

The invasion of Nazi-held Europe at Normandy in June

1944 started a highly successful Allied offensive against

the Germans. After the breakout from the beachhead and

the pursuit across northern France sent the foe reeling

back into the Reich, the Allies thought that the enemy was

incapable of mounting a heavy counteroffensive. After

all, the Germans had suffered heavy losses on both fronts,

and several of their allies had deserted the Axis cause.

In the face of the deteriorating military situation,

Hitler decided on a desperate gamble: a massive counterattack that would send 25 divisions against the western

allies in the Ardennes region of Belgium and Luxembourg.

(Map 1) He designated the scheme WACHT AM RHEIN or "watch

on the Rhine" to give the impression that it was to defend

the Rhine River.

The plan's real purpose was to surround and destroy

the British and American forces north of the BastogneBrussels-Antwerp line. The drive would cross the Meuse

River and culminate in the capture of Antwerp, with German

forces moving northwestward along a narrow front on an

axis of advance through Butgenbach, Trois-Ponts, Werbomont, and the Ourthe River, to a Meuse River crossing

north of the Huy-Antwerp line.

On 16 December 1944, the Germans attacked the northern flank of the American line, hitting the 106th Infantry

Division, an inexperienced unit fresh from the United

States that had been on the front line only a week. The

3
Germans tore huge holes in the defenses, and their troops

raced through, heading for the Meuse River. American

troops reeled under the surprise onslaught; some frontline

units were virtually destroyed and others fled to the

rear. In places, small American units, such as the 51st

Engineer Combat Battalion, held firm, but there appeared

to be no stopping the Germans.

The 51st was not supposed to be on the front line.

For two months before the surprise counterattack, the

battalion had been operating 30 sawmills throughout the

Ardennes area, producing lumber to construct winter

quarters for First united States Army troops. When the

Germans poured into the forest, the 51st became engulfed

in the battle that swirled all around it. Quickly, the

unit's mission changed, and it hurriedly established

roadblocks, mined and destroyed bridges, and did whatever

else it could along a 25-mile front to stall the German

armor and infantry thrusts until superior forces relieved

it.

When the Germans struck, the 51st Engineer Combat

Battalion was about 30 months old and had no experience in

countermobility operations. The unit had been activated

at Camp Bowie, Texas, on 13 June 1942, as the first

battalion of the 51st Engineer Combat Regiment. On 18

March 1943, the 51st Engineer Combat Regiment was

reorganized as the 1111th Engineer Combat Group under

the command of Colonel H. Wallis Anderson. The first

battalion of the group became the 51st Engineer Combat

Battalion, with Captain Robert B. Yates in command.

At least winter was no stranger to the 51st. The

battalion spent March of 1943 at Macomb Reservation, a

cold barren post near Plattsburg, New York. There the

51st learned to build and dismantle tactical bridges.

They put a combination wooden trestle and H-10 steel

bridge over the Salmon River at night, then recovered the

bridge the next day. They also conducted a ponton bridge
exercise on frozen Lake Champlain and built a 30-foot-high

timber trestle bridge.

The 51st stayed in New York through April, living in

pup tents and putting ponton bridges across newly thawed

lakes. In addition to bridge construction, the battalion

conducted combined training exercises at platoon, company,

and battalion levels, practicing combat firing, attack of

a fortified area, combat in cities, mine laying and

removal, and road construction.

In September 1943, the battalion started the long

trek that eventually led to the Ardennes. A train ride

ended at the XIII Corps maneuver area nearElkins, West

Virginia, where the 51st participated in a 10-day

exercise, with activities including construction of a

road, a landing strip, and a Bailey bridge. In October,

the battalion moved to Fort Dix, New Jersey, to prepare to

go overseas. From there, the battalion's organizational

equipment went to the Los Angeles Port of Embarkation, and

the troops went to Hampton Roads, Virginia, and shipped

out. While on the high seas, the battalion received

orders to proceed to the Mediterranean Base Section, Oran,

Algeria, for transshipment to India. The 51st debarked on

5 December at Oran but, with its equipment still headed

from Los Angeles to Asia, received an unscheduled break in

its training.

While the 51st waited in North Africa, the plans of

the Allies changed. The 5lst, along with four other

engineer battalions awaiting movement to India, were

ordered to England for the invasion of Europe. On 12

January 1944, the battalion left Casablanca on an eightday voyage to Liverpool.

The 51st spent five months in England. The unit was

assigned to the First Army under the command of General

Omar N. Bradley.. Training resumed, with combined and

specialist activities, including night operations and

related bridge construction, Bailey and fixed bridge

5
construction, road construction, mines and minefields, and

explosives and demolitions.

On 19 June 1944, the 51st loaded onto three Liberty

ships, cooled their heels aboard ship for a week, then

crossed the English Channel to Normandy on 26 June. For

the next four months the battalion provided combat

engineer support to the First Army. Most of the work consisted of road repair and maintenance, engineer reconnaissance, mine clearing, and water supply. During this

time, the battalion suffered casualties that included six

wounded from the explosion of stray artillery shells and

the strafing of a German plane.

On 4 September 1944, the battalion moved 152 miles

from the vicinity of Chartres, west of Paris, to an area

near Soissons, northeast of Paris. The Germans had been

retreating rapidly, destroying bridges and culverts and

cratering roads. As a result, the major activity of the

5lst changed from road repair and maintenance to bridge

and culvert construction, replacing Bailey bridges and

other temporary bridges for reuse in forward areas.

On 17 September, the 51st moved to Germany, 110 miles

east of Soissons, almost to the Luxembourg border. Here

it built bridges for two weeks, then moved to Malmedy,

Belgium, where for three weeks the battalion kept busy

training as infantry. Then it began the job it would keep

until the German surprise, cutting wood for First Army

billets.

Just before the German Ardennes offensive, two men

arrived who would exert significant influence on the

battalion. On 14 December, Major Robert Yates, now the

battalion executive officer, returned from several months

in the hospital. A day later, Lieutenant Colonel Harvey

R. Fraser assumed command of the battalion. Less than six

years out of the Military Academy, the peripatetic Fraser

soon became known as "Hurry Up Harvey." He and the easygoing Yates played key roles in the unit's efforts to hold

6
off the Germans.

This publication tells the story of Fraser, Yates,

and the 51st during the Ardennes counteroffensive.

Written even before V-E Day, the narrative is a fine

example of combat history. Based on interviews and afteraction reports, it is an important and little-known

primary source for the Engineer role in the battle. Its

author, combat historian Ken Hechler, was a captain in the

Armored Force and held a Ph.D. from Columbia University.

He later served nine terms in the United States House of

Representatives and is. secretary of state for West

Virginia. His narrative provides a detailed description

of the battalion‘s actions to delay the German offensive.

The accompanying maps and coordinates allow the reader to

locate precisely the Engineers* defensive positions and

make it possible to follow the tactics of the 51st's

officers. Of the six maps provided with this history,

Maps 3-5 were reproduced from the original manuscript.

Hechler's clear and comprehensive record of the battalion's actions is a worthwhile instructional tool for

the study of countermobility operations.

A Note on the Maps

The source for Maps 2, 4, and 6 is a 1:100,000-scale

map of Belgium and Northeast France, encompassing the

Marche area (sheet no. 13). These maps follow the Military

Grid Coordinate System. It is a system of rectangular

coordinates, with the vertical (Y) grid line running true

north and south and the horizontal (X) grid line running

at right angles to the Y grid line. To plot a six-digit

coordinate, read the first and second numbers as the X -

coordinate and the fourth and fifth numbers as the Y -

coordinate. This will direct you to a grid block, which

you then mentally divide into ten parts on each axis. TO

locate a point within the block, read the third number to
the riqht and then the sixth number up. The phrase to

remember is read right-up.
The 5lst Engineer Combat Battalion

and the Battle of the Bulge

December 1944 - January 1945

bY

Ken Hechler

During the German breakthrough in the Ardennes, the

51st Engineer Combat Battalion held and delayed the enemy

at a number of vital points along the lines of

penetration. For four days--18 to 21 December--Companies

A and B held a barrier line from Barvaux to Hotton, south

of Marche to Rochefort, blowing up and defending three

footbridges, two highway bridges, and one railway bridge,

while holding a 25-mile front against enemy armored and

infantry thrusts. At the same time, Company C was holding

Trois-Ponts, denying the enemy the use of the vital eastwest Highway N23 to Werbomont. Company C stood its ground

in Trois-Ponts, tricked the enemy into believing it had

superior forces and armor, and, after being relieved by

a regiment of the 82d Airborne Division, covered the

withdrawal of that regiment from the town after its

abortive attack east of the Salm River.1

There was nothing in the background of the battalion

that was related to these achievements. Since activation

as the 1st Battalion of the 51st Engineer Combat Regiment

on 13 June 1942, this unit had passed a rather

uninteresting career. They trained at Camp Bowie [Texas];

shivered through a hard winter at Plattsburg Barracks, New

9
York; did the dirty work on target ranges and road

construction at XIII Corps' West Virginia maneuvers of

1943; and acted as demonstration troops for the Engineer

School at Fort Belvoir [Virginia].

The battalion landed at Normandy on D-Day plus 21,

but life degenerated into dumping crushed rock on

Carentan's roads, maintaining a few water points, and

sweeping some mines. Two incidents stood out during the

routine months on the Continent: quick thinking and heroic

action saved many lives and equipment during a Normandy

ammunition-dump fire, and eight men of the battalion

quelled and captured 60 German paratroopers after a brief,

sharp firefight in mid-September.2 The battalion did have

one common bond that assisted it during the December fight

against overwhelming odds: nearly all of the officers and

men were veterans of some two years of service in the

battalion; the companies had worked together as units; and

teamwork was clicking smoothly.3

On the eve of the breakthrough, the battalion was

operating about 30 sawmills in the vicinity of Marche,

Dinant, Rochefort, Ciney, Hotton, and Erezee, thereby

contributing materially to the First Army winterization and timber-cutting program. The battalion had cut

2,600,000 board feet since the inauguration of the program

in October. The average for the first 17 days of December

was 58,717 board feet per day, with a maximum of 80,600

board feet in one day.4

At that time, the 158th Engineer Combat Battalion had

been charged with the defense of the Marche area. 5

Routine activities in the running of the sawmills were

conducted by the 51st on the first day of the German

breakthrough, but on 17 December at 1730 the battalion was

alerted for ground activity.6 The alert came from the CO

[commanding officer1 of the 158th Engineer Combat

Battalion. The line companies were immediately alerted

and a staff meeting was called to make plans for action.7

10
Lieutenant Colonel Harvey

R. Fraser, CO, 51st

Engineer Combat Battalion

(foreground), and Captain

William R. Mueller,

Adjutant, during February

1945 awards ceremony at

Huertgen Forest, Germany.

Commanding Officers

The performance of the 51st Engineer Combat Battalion

during the following days can better be appreciated by

knowing the commanding officer, Lieutenant Colonel Harvey

R. Fraser, and his executive officer, Major Robert

B. Yates. They were two different personalities who

complemented each other in directing the battalion.*

During the breakthrough, Colonel Fraser was with that

portion of his battalion along the Barvaux-HottonRochefort front; Major Yates was at Trois-Ponts.

The peculiar angle to the performance of these

officers is that they both arrived at the battalion within

two days of the start of the breakthrough. Major Yates, a

veteran member of the battalion, had been hospitalized in

August and returned to his post on 15 December. Colonel

Fraser was a newcomer to the battalion, having assumed

command on 14 December. Both officers were almost imme-
Captain (later Major)

Robert B. Yates (left) and

First Lieutenant (later

Captain) Preston C. Hodges

at Macomb Reservation,

Plattsburg, NY, 1943.

diately called on to command units and slow the German

advance.9

When Colonel Fraser arrived, the first thing he did

was call the battalion officers together, introduce

himself, and outline his policies. He sketched his own

past and had an opportunity to talk

officers long enough to find out their

them up personally.10

Prior to coming to the battalion,

with each of the

background and size

Colonel Fraser had

a brilliant background, but it was almost entirely

confined to staff work. After graduating from the U.S.

Military Academy in 1939, he spent a period of close to

three years on Oahu (Hawaii) at Schofield Barracks. He

was due to return 8 December 1941, but remained by request for nine more months. The remainder of his prebreakthrough career was spent as an Engineer battalion

commander working on routine road and airstrip construction, plus doing a few shifts with Communications

12
Zone base sections checking training and allocating

troops. At St. Malo, with sniper fire still chattering

on the day the citadel fell, Colonel Fraser led a

reconnaissance party that obtained timely information on

harbor, beach, and railroad facilities. But this was as

close as this 28-year-old, nervously active, and sharpminded officer was allowed to come to combat operations.11

Irked by this inactivity, Colonel Fraser went to see

p the First Army Engineer on 12 December to ask for a combat

assignment. He was so sure he would not return to

Brittany Base Section that he took all his equipment to

Spa; two days later he was commanding the 51st. "When I

saw what they were doing at the sawmills and along the

roads," said Colonel Fraser, "I asked whether it really

was a combat outfit. I was soon to find out."12

When the 158th Engineer Combat Battalion departed to

assist in the defense of the Bastogne area, the 51st was

left with the responsibility of defending the [Marche]

area. Captain John W. Barnes, battalion S-3, states,

"Colonel Fraser sat down with a map and decided that the

Ourthe River was a natural defense line, and he prepared

plans to erect roadblocks and prepare key bridges for

demolition. Several days later group sent down an overlay

directing that defenses be established at precisely the

same points which Colonel Fraser had selected."13

It was not only his organizing ability but also his

leadership that made Colonel Fraser a factor in the

success of the battalion. Throughout the defense of the

25-mile front, he was ubiquitous. At times it is impossible to trace his trail because so many men claim that

he was with them at widely separated points. During the

severest test of the battalion--at Hotton on 21 December--

Colonel Fraser was on the enemy side of the river for a

period. He kept the widely separated forces unified.14

Major Yates had a different task at Trois-Points. His

forces were concentrated in a small area, and his problem
was more one of deceiving the enemy into thinking that

there was a superior force defending Trois-Ponts. He also

had the job of inspiring confidence in 150 men who after

the first day of action had no tank destroyers or antitank

guns and were opposed by German armor.15

Before the breakthrough, Major Yates had held various

staff positions within the battalion for the preceding two

years, having been its CO for several months in 1943. His

6-foot, 3-inch, 200-pound figure towered over the scene at

Trois-Ponts. An affable Texan, easy-going in nature but

determined in spirit, Major Yates held together his little

company by prodding, cajoling, and encouraging them to

resist long after they had reached reasonable limits of

human endurance. "I would find them asleep standing up

after 94 hours on the job," said Major Yates, "but they

were standing up."16

Colonel William E. Ekman, CO of the 505th Parachute

Infantry Regiment, which entered Trois-Ponts on 20

December, paid high tribute to the spirit and courage of

Company C of the 51st and singled out Major Yates for his

leadership. "He had everything under control," said

Colonel Ekman, "and appeared ready and able to hold the

town indefinitely. When the 82d Airborne Division came

in, we expected to find this unit decimated and

discouraged. Instead, Major Yates approached me and

uttered a classic phrase, 'Say, I'll bet you fellows are

glad we're here.'"17

Adding a note of commendation to the many other

tributes for Major Yates, Colonel Fraser observed, "I do

not know another officer who could have handled such a

difficult situation as admirably as you did."18

Defense at Trois-Ponts

Company C left Melreux at 2200 on 17 December and

arrived at Trois-Ponts at 2330 the same day.19 (Map 2) The

company, commanded by Captain Sam Scheuber, immediately

14

started to establish defensive positions on the west bank

of the Ambleve River, which skirts the east edge of town.

Company C's strength at this time was approximately 140

men, about 20 still being absent at the sawmills.20 The

company had eight bazookas, six .50-caliber machine guns,

and four .30-caliber machine guns. A 57-mm. antitank [At]

gun from the 526th Armored Infantry Battalion also became

available. In personnel, the company was reinforced by a

squad each from the 526th Armored Infantry Battalion and

Company A of the 291st Engineer Combat Battalion, as well

as several stragglers who were picked up coming through

Trois-Points.21

Trois-Ponts is studded with bridges, underpasses,

railroads, rivers, cliffs, and road junctions.22 The

Ambleve and Salm rivers join there, as do railroad lines

running south to Vielsalm, northwest to Avwaille, and

northeast to Stavelot. Highway N23 enters Trois-Ponts

from Stavelot by underpassing the railroad at two points

just before it joins north-south Highway N33, merges with

N33 south for a few hundred yards, crosses the Ambleve

River, and then turns west across another bridge over the

Salm River and proceeds toward Werbomont. The enemy

approached Trois-Ponts by this road and was thwarted in

its attempts to go west to Werbomont because the 51st had

blown up two bridges over the rivers. The enemy then

turned its columns north after clearing the railroad

underpasses and proceeded toward Stoumont.23

The 1111th Engineer Combat Group had its CP [command

post1 in Trois-Ponts at the start of the action, and its

small staff hurried the preparations for defense before

the arrival of Company C of the 51st. Somebody asked

Colonel Harry Anderson, CO of the group (and former

battalion commander of the 51st), whether he intended to

withdraw. His reply was characteristic, "We have come

several thousand miles to fight these Nazis-not to

withdraw from them."24

16
On the morning of 18 December, the columns of the 7th

Armored Division were passing through Trois-Ponts on their

way to stem the enemy attack in the Vielslm-St. Vith

area. The 7th Armored had two accidents in twisting

through Trois-Ponts, which rebounded to the benefit of the

defenders of the town. A half-track with a personnel

complement of 12 men, towing a 57-mm. antitank gun, broke

down in Trois-Ponts. This half-track belonged to Company

B of the 526th Armored Infantry Battalion. (The 526th

Armored Infantry Battalion was not a part of 7th Armored

Division; it was a separate battalion. Company B was on

its way to Malmedy.) Colonel Anderson directed his S-4,

Captain Robert N. Jewett, to take command of the squad and

supervise the placing of the gun. Captain Jewett put the

gun and crew in position on Highway N23 on the road to

Stavelot, about a mile toward Stavelot from the two

railroad underpasses.25

The second accident benefited the defenders of TroisPonts a little less directly. A tracked vehicle (observers do not agree on whether it was an M5 light tank

or an M7 105-mm. self-propelled armored field artillery

"Priest") slipped off the road while making a sharp turn

at the bridge (674988). The vehicle went over on its side

into the river and was abandoned. Later in the day, when

the 51st was forced to blow the bridge, the ensuing fire

set off the ammunition in the tank. However, it did not

go off all at once but exploded at intervals all afternoon

and into the evening of the 18th. Enough time elapsed

between explosions to allow for loading an artillery

piece, possibly tricking the enemy into thinking that

artillery was available to the group defending TroisPonts.26

Little by little, the 51st company picked up a few

more reinforcements. Three men from the 341st Engineer

Battalion who had originally been in Trois-Ponts guarding

the bridge at (676989) were attached to Company C. A

17
soldier in a British uniform drove his truck through town

several times before being apprehended and attached to

Company C. He had a carbine, a second lieutenant's

insignia, and a captain's map case, but the news of

Operation GREIF had not yet caused suspicion toward such

characters. A GI who said he was from a nearby artillery

unit walked up and down the town with a girl on his arm

until he too was called in and attached to Company C.27

A somewhat larger group was attached during the

morning of the 18th. At 0800, Lieutenant Albert J.

Walters, a platoon leader in Company A, 291st Engineer

Combat Battalion, left his battalion CP at Basse-Bodeux to

assist in preparing for demolition of the bridge at

(683977), one mile southeast of Trois-Ponts. En route, he

was intercepted by Lieutenant Colonel James A. Kirkland,

executive officer of the 1111th Engineer Combat Group.

Colonel Kirkland attached Lieutenant Walters and his squad

to Company C, and they continued to defend the bridge on

the south flank of the defenders of Trois-ponts.28

The defense of the town initially consisted of one

platoon with two bazookas on high ground covering the

approach from Aisomont; Captain Jewett's group with the

lone antitank gun covering the road from Stavelot; a rear

guard covering the N23 approach from Werbomont; and the

remainder of the company deployed with bazookas, machine

guns, and M1s in the buildings of the town that fronted

the Salm and Ambleve rivers.29

Captain Jewett sent two of the 526th Armored Infantry

men, Corporal Bruce W. Frazier and Private First Class

Ralph J. Bieker, 250 yards up the road toward Stavelot

with a daisy chain of ten mines and instructions to jerk

them across the road when a tank approached and then run

back to where the 57-mm. antitank gun was placed.

Four 526th Armored Infantry men (McCollum, Hollenback,

Buchanan, and Alonzo B. Higgins) were manning the antitank gun. Lieutenant Richard Green, platoon leader of 3d

18
Platoon, Company C, 51st Engineer Combat Battalion, along

with Private First Class Andrew Salazar of the same unit,

was immediately behind the gun. The half-track, with its

driver from the 526th and with Captain Jewett, was backed

into N23 on the opposite side of the road from the

antitank gun, ready to pull out in the event of a tank

attack that might overrun the position.30

Several more men from Company C and the 526th were in

a ditch along the road back of the antitank gun. Just

beyond the underpass on the Stavelot side Staff Sergeant

Fred Salatino was manning the .50-caliber antiaircraft gun

in a 2 1/2-ton truck, along with Technician Fifth Class

Jacob Young. A wire was strung from this truck back to

the company CP in the Trois-Ponts railroad station.31

About 200 yards up the Stavelot road beyond the

antitank gun, Lieutenant Green posted a combination

outpost and getaway consisting of Technicians Fifth Class

Robert Logan and Elmer Helton and Private First Class

Milbert Brown of Company C.Brown as driver had his jeep;

up until that time Helton had been an air compressor

operator and Logan a truck driver, but they were pressed

into service for reconnaissance. The plan was to have the

three watch the men with the daisy chain and then alert

the gunners and the rest of the squad if a tank

approached.32

Firing was heard in the vicinity of Stavelot during

the early part of the morning. Shortly before noon, a

Tiger Royal tank nosed around the bend toward the AT gun.

Frazier and Bieker strung their mines, but could not

resist the temptation to take a few shots with their

rifles at the heads of enemy tankers that protruded from

the lead tank. Several other tanks soon followed the lead

tank, which stopped at the daisy chain. Brown, Logan, and

Helton say that the tank started firing its machine gun,

so they returned with their jeep to Lieutenant Green's

position with the simple report, "they're comming!"

19
Lieutenant Green replied, "OK, notify them at the CP in

case I can't get them on the telephone, and then come back

here with the jeep."33

By this time, the squad on and near the gun could see

the lead tanks and hear others through the trees. "Now

let's be damn sure they're Jerries let's not mess this

thing up," somebody said. Others echoed this thought.

Perhaps as a result of this, the enemy tank in third place

fired four rounds before the 57-mm. gun could get off a

round. One shell, an AP [antipersonnel] tracer, skipped

on the river to their backs. Another zipped no more than

six inches over their heads. ’ Another hit a tree behind

the gun, tipping over the tree and showering fragments in

the area. Then the gun crew opened up, and one of their

early rounds started the leading'enemy tank smoking.34

There was some difficulty at first with ammunition

for the antitank gun. There were seven rounds for the

gun, and the crew said that if they couldn't repulse the

attack with seven rounds that would be all they would ever

get a chance to use. It soon became apparent from the

strength of the enemy armored attack that more rounds

would be needed. Captain Jewett said that he could

observe eight tanks coming around the bend toward his

position. There were no dismounted infantry accompanying

along the road, but about a dozen infantrymen were working

their way along the south side of the road.35 Colonel

Anderson, observing from across the river through field

glasses, counted a total of 19 tanks that came through the

position and later turned right on the road to Stoumont.36

The little crew of defenders started an ammunition bucket

brigade, with Captain Jewett tossing the shells across the

road to Lieutenant Green, who forwarded them to Private

Salazar, who handed them up to the gun crew.

The morale of the defenders was not raised any when a

resounding roar from the town told them that the northern

two bridges had been blown, cutting them off from Trois20
Ponts. The 880mm. shells hit closer and closer until one

hit at the base of the gun, killing all four of the crew

and stunning Private Salazar. Realizing the futility of

further resistance, the remainder of the crew piled into

the half-track and proceeded by their only escape

route--toward Stoumont. The 2 1/2-ton truck followed.

Lieutenant Green and his survivors from Company C made a

wide circle at Petit Coo and returned to Trois-Ponts at

1500 by coming in from the west on Highway N23, while

Captain Jewett and the survivors of the 526th Armored

Infantry Battalion found their way back to the new group

CP at Modave.37

Almost simultaneous with the battle along the

Stavelot road, the 2d Platoon of Company C, commanded by

Lieutenant Fred L. Nabors, was also attacked by enemy

armor. Lieutenant Nabors' platoon was deployed along the

hill on the Aisomont road. One bazooka was firing southeast from the road below at (677988), from which it had

a perfect field of fire. Another bazooka had a good

flanking firing position slightly to the east.

During the morning of 18 December, three enemy tanks

approached the 2d Platoon's position, and they were

detected approximately 1/2 mile away. The first tank had

reinforced armor plate on the front and was allowed to

pass by toward a string of daisy-chain mines across the

road. The bazooka then engaged the second tank, but did

not knock it out. The third tank started to fire its

machine guns and forced the 2d Platoon out of position by

the intensity of the fire. Thereafter, the 2d Platoon

retired to the town side of the river and took up

protection of the right (south) flank of the Company C

line. The defense collapsed because one of the bazookas

failed to fire, another was knocked out of the loader's

hands with machine gun fire, and the daisy chain was

exploded by machine guns. None of the three enemy tanks,

however, attempted to follow the 2d Platoon, Company C,

21
into Trois-Ponts. (See -___-Appendix A.)

The bridge over the railroad at the junction of N33

with the Aisomont road was blown on 18 December, but

foot troops could still cross the structure. Lieutenant

Nabors' platoon blew it up again the following day. A

footbridge across the Salm River at (674982) was also

blown on the first day of action.38 At 1300, the bridge

over the Salm River on Highway N23 was demolished.

Shortly thereafter, Major Yates arrived in Trois-Ponts,

unaware of the situation and merely bound for the daily

liaison meeting at the 1111th Engineer Combat Group.

Colonel Anderson charged him with the defense of the city,

and under FUSA [First U.S. Army] orders, the group left

Trois-Ponts for Modave.

Major Yates deployed his men in houses along the

river, providing flank and rear guards and good fields of

fire for machine guns and bazookas. One enemy tank, which

turned left on N33 instead of taking the Stoumont road

when it reached the junction of N23 and N33, was surprised with .50-caliber machine gun fire. The crew had

dismounted, and five of them were hit by a gun manned by

Sergeant Evers Gossard. A sixth member of the crew

remounted the tank and started to turn its gun toward the

.50-caliber machine gun, whereupon Sergeant Gossard and

his crew discreetly retired. The enemy tank hovered

around for the remainder of the day, firing sporadically.

It withdrew on the night of the 18th.

"We kept sniping at them across the river for the

next few days," said Major Yates, "but every shot of ours

seemed to draw about a thousand in return. So we decided

to deceive them as to how great a force we had available."

The company had about six 2 1/2-ton trucks available,

and they were kept running in and out of town. After

dark, they were run out of Trois-Ponts on Highway N23

toward Werbomont without lights and then run back on the

same road with their lights on, simulating the arrival of

22
reinforcements. Major Yates hit on the idea of simulating

the presence and arrival of armor in Trois-Ponts. This

was done by putting chains on a single four-ton truck, and

it was clanked back and forth repeatedly during the next

few days. The closest facsimile to artillery or antitank

guns that the company had were the bazookas, and as Major

Yates said, "They made a pretty loud noise, so we used to

shift them around from place to place after dark and it

may have deceived the enemy into thinking we had a couple

of light artillery pieces." In addition, he moved small

groups of riflemen from place to place and had them fire

in such a way as to create the impression of considerable

strength in small arms.39

On the afternoon of the 18th, P-47s were observed to

take a toll of four or five enemy tanks that were circling

north and northwest along N33 toward Stoumont. Enemy

armored columns passing along this road were strafed and

dive-bombed quite effectively. "But lots of us in TroisPonts felt pretty helpless with rifles and carbines on our

shoulders," said Lieutenant Green.40

After the return of Lieutenant Green's group and the

withdrawal of Lieutenant Nabors' platoon, the three

platoons of the company were consolidated into two-one

group being placed on the river south of town, with its

line swinging back to the west on the edge of town. Most

of Lieutenant Green's 3d Platoon was on the north side of

Trois-Ponts, also swinging its line to the west on the

outskirts. Listening posts were established 500 to 600

yards out from the MLR [main line of resistance], and

pulled into a tight perimeter defense after dark. (This

was done because the small number of men available for

listening posts were widely separated and would have given

the enemy opportunity to infiltrate patrols between them

had they not been pulled in about 300 yards from their

daytime positions.)41

At 0900 on 19 December, Lieutenant Green and Techni23
cal Sergeant Matthew R. Carlyle crossed the river, covered

by Major Yates and three others, and went up the Stavelot

road toward the knocked-out 57-mm. gun. (Map 3) They

found nothing in the railroad underpasses but noticed four

men in American uniforms around the gun. A little farther

up the road was an M8 armored car and a jeep with freshly

painted white stars. "Hey, Joe,m yelled Sergeant Carlyle,

and the men excitedly cried, "Amerikans!" and started to

fire. The motors of the M8 and jeep turned over, but

Lieutenant Green and Sergeant Carlyle did not wait to see

if they were being followed.42 "After that," said Major

Yates, "we did not need any patrols; we could see

everything that was happening across the river."43

A brief firefight occurred on 19 December when men in

Lieutenant Nabors' platoon engaged enemy on the hill just

south of the Aisomont road at (680985). When rifle fire

was directed at this infantry group, the enemy replied

with both small arms and artillery on Trois-Ponts No

casualties resulted from this brief scuffle, but it taught

Company C to keep better hidden and change positions

frequently in order to avoid artillery concentrations.44

After the bridges had been blown, Colonels Anderson

and Kirkland observed several enemy tanks approach one of

the blown bridges. An elderly couple ran out in front of

their house and motioned with their arms; it was difficult

to tell at first whether they were waving at the tanks or

trying to tell them that the bridge was blown. One of the

dismounted tank men was observed shooting the woman with

his pistol; the man caught her when she fell and then he

was, also shot. Additional shots were fired into the

motionless figures on the ground.45

During the engagement, Major Yates observed a Belgian

boy of about 12 running toward the river chased by a

German rifleman, who was firing after him. Four or five

other German soldiers were standing across the river,

laughingly watching the performance. Enraged, Major Yates

24

fired several shots at these spectators and dropped one

of them before they dispersed, while the boy and his

tormentor disappeared behind the buildings.

Enemy patrols attempted to probe across the river

throughout the period, but were all repulsed by rifle and

machine gun fire and grenades. The enemy had no way to

bring armor across to Company C's positions without

building a bridge. They did not give signs of desiring to

build a bridge or make an assault crossing of the river.46

On the night of 19 December, Lieutenant Walters'

squad from the 291st Engineer Combat Battalion blew the

bridge that they were defending at (683977). Just as

enemy infantry coming up from the south started to cross

the bridge, Sergeant Jean B. Miller touched off the

charge, and the squad worked its way back to join Company

C in the defense of Trois-Ponts.47

Another welcome addition to the small force atTroisPonts arrived at 2000 on 19 December, when a patrol from

the 85th Reconnaissance Squadron, consisting of fifteen

men and three M8 assault gunsr arrived on Highway N23 from

Basse-Bodeux. Not realizing that they were friendly

troops, Company C's rear guard fired on them, but

identification was quickly made. The next day the three

guns were set up on the outskirts of town on high ground

where the patrol could observe and still keep its guns in

defiladed positions. Although the assault guns remained

in position outside of Trois-Ponts, the patrol never

actually engaged the enemy.48

On 20 December, elements of the 505th Parachute

Infantry Regiment of the 82d Airborne Division learned of

the presence of the force defending Trois-Ponts, and the

regimental commander, Colonel William E. Ekman, ordered

his 2d and 3d Battalions to send three bazooka teams each

to the beleaguered town. The rest of the regiment then

started to move into Trois-Ponts and the 505th's CP was

established at 1300 on 20 December.49

26
Company C had its greatest casualties on 20 December,

although this was by no means the day of greatest

fighting. From 1930 to 2100, enemy artillery intensified

in the entire waterfront area. Private Carl Strawser was

killed when a shell hit his .50-caliber machine gun

position, and Sergeant Joseph Gyure was seriously wounded

at the same time. Staff Sergeant William W. Rankin was

killed by a 20-mm. shell while stationed at an O P

[observation post].50

A platoon of Engineers from the attachments of

the 505th Parachute Regiment (307th Airborne Engineer

Battalion), assisted by Company C, then repaired the

bridges at (677982) and (674986) for a company of the

505th to cross. Later in the night a second company

crossed on the repaired bridge, while the defenders of

Trois-Ponts held their positions in the face of sporadic

enemy artillery fire.

At 1100 on 21 December, reports began coming in that

the two companies of the 505th were having difficulty

across the river. The enemy launched a strong counterattack and started to surround elements that were

defending on the hill overlooking Trois-Ponts from the

east. At 1500, Major Yates received a message from the

1111th Engineer Combat Group ordering Company C to

withdraw. He brushed it aside and characteristically

replied that it was impossible to disengage from the

enemy, inasmuch as Company C was covering the withdrawal

of the 82d Airborne Division.51

Captain Scheuber, Company C's commander, at 1500

ordered that the bridge at (674986) over the Salm River

and the bridge at (677982) over the Ambleve River be

prepared again for imminent demolition.52 Of these, the

timber trestle bridge over the Salm was the most difficult

to blow. The task was assigned to Lieutenant Joseph B.

Milgram, Jr., and six [enlisted] men--Sergeant Elvin

Goldsmith, Corporal Odis C. Faust, Technician Fifth Class

27
Paul H. Keck, Private Jessie R. Mock, Private Maurice S.

Walker, and Private Jose E. Marquez. Knowing that the

bridge posts had previously been blown, Lieutenant Milgram

decided to use necklace charges for the stringers and to

use time fuzes and primacord to set off the charges. He

ordered his men to make nine necklace charges.

When these were ready, the group proceeded toward the

bridge on both sides of the road and were subjected to

machine gun and small arms fire along the route.

Lieutenant Milgram's plan had been to prepare the

stringers on the friendly side of the bridge first by

working from the top side of the bridge and placing the

charges on the sides of the stringers. However, the

removal of the decking would have entailed too much work

under fire, so the group crossed the bridge to the enemy

side and climbed underneath in order to get the maximum

amount of cover from enemy fire.

Their movement was observed, and the fire increased,

so Lieutenant Milgram ordered all but Technician Fifth

Class Keck to crawl along the enemy side of the river and

wade across at a point lower downstream that would give a

little more cover. The next job was to secure the

primacord on the friendly side of the river at a point

where it might be reached to blow up the bridge. After

this was completed, the entire group waded the river and

reported to Captain Scheuber that the bridge was ready for

demolition. At 1650, the order was given to blow the

bridges.

The Ambleve bridge presented no unusual problems, but

the Salm bridge was more difficult. Lieutenant Milgram

and Technician Fifth Class Keck proceeded to within 60

yards from where the primacord lay. From there Lieutenant

Milgram crawled the remainder of the distance, checked the

cord, pulled the fuze lighter, and then ran about 50 yards

in the fading light but in full view of the enemy until he

reached the cover of a building.53

28
Having accomplished his aim and mission of covering

the withdrawal of the 505th Regiment% elements from the

east of Trois-Ponts, Major Yates ordered Company C to

begin withdrawing from the town at 1930 on 21 December.

The withdrawal was completed by 2000, and the company

rejoined the battalion at 2330 at Marche.54

The Battle of Hotton

The most bitter and tactically important battle

fought by the remainder of the 51st Engineer Combat

Battalion was in defense of the vital Ourthe River bridge

at Hotton on 21 December.55

In the days preceding the battle of Hotton, the two

companies in the Marche area feverishly prepared bridges,

roadblocks, minefields, demolitions, and abatis along the

Ourthe River line from Durbuy to La Roche [Laroche]. They

had numerous minor brushes with enemy forces during the

period. With the departure of the 158th Engineer Combat

Battalion for the Bastogne area, Colonel Fraser was

formally charged with the defense of the area at 1930 on

19 December. He had already prepared and started to

execute plans; at 0500 that morning Companies A and B were

combat loaded and poised for action near Hargimont and

Hogne, respectively.56

Confusion reigned in the towns and along the roads.

The local gendarmerie unsuccessfully attempted to check

evacuations and then tried to keep the roads clear.

Parachutists and rumors of parachutists kept everyone in

turmoil. Colonel Fraser finally instituted a rigid

civilian check system that resulted in the capture and

execution of many enemy spies and agents in civilian

clothes. The largest such group was apprehended by

Company B in Hotton; it consisted of 21 men in civilian

clothes whose baggage contained considerable supplies of

American cigarettes, rations, and uniforms. The next

largest bag was made the following day when eight

29
The vital Ourthe River bridge at Hotton

civilians were picked up by Headquarters and Service

Company at Humain after they refused to surrender their

arms.57

The next problem that faced Colonel Fraser was the

stream of stragglers pouring through the area. Some came

with units evacuating in an orderly manner, albeit a bit

hurriedly, to the rear. Others rushed through in batches,

with clothes ripped, feet soaked, and moraleshatteredthoroughly beaten men from overrun units. All of them

asked the same questions: "Where is my unit? How far

have the Germans broken through?" The next most favorite

question concerned traffic and road information--almost

invariably regarding the area toward the west. To create

a semblance of order out of this Grand Central Station

bedlam, Colonel Fraser directed that a clearing point be

established where the name and unit of all these birds

of passage be recorded. This information proved invaluable as an aid to reuniting the lost, strayed, and

30
straggling.58

During the early morning hours of 19 December, the

barrier lines were completed. Company B covered the area

on the west bank of the Ourthe River from Hotton to Durbuy

inclusive. The 1st Platoon defended the immediate area of

Hotton and Melreux; the 2d Platoon the area from Melreux

to Durbuy; and the 3d Platoon the vicinity of Durbuy and

the left flank.59

At 0400 on 19 December, the 1st Platoon of Company A,

under Lieutenant Floyd D. Wright, was ordered to Hampteau

to prepare a roadblock and a footbridge for demolition.60

Ten minutes later the 2d Platoon, under Lieutenant Paul

Curtis, departed for Marcourt on a similar mission

regarding a class 10 bridge. At the same time, the 3d

Platoon, under Lieutenant Raymond A. Trafford, was ordered

to remain as battalion reserve in the vicinity of Harsin,

the battalion CP. Later in the morning, the 2d Platoon

reinforced its right flank at (432791) with a strong

roadblock consisting of one squad, two bazooka teams, and

one .50-caliber machine gun.

More specifically, the following defenses were completed on 19 December. (Map 4)

1. Two antitank minefields at (368880), 200 yards

down-stream from [the railroad bridge mentioned below].

2. A railroad bridge at (360890) prepared for

demolition, and a ford beneath mined.

3. Highway bridge on N29 at (369879) prepared for

demolition and defended by two 40-mm. guns from the 440th

AAA [Antiaircraft Artillery] Weapons Battalion, two .50-

caliber machine guns, and two bazookas.

4. Footbridge at Hampteau at (384867) prepared for

demolition, defended by two .50-caliber machine guns and

one .30-caliber machine gun.

5. Refugee and straggler point established at

(390865) in cooperation with local defense officials.

6. Two footbridges at (3998591 guarded and prepared

31

,

for demolition.

7. Class 10 bridge at Marcourt (421820) prepared for

destruction, defended by a half-track, bazooka, two .50-

caliber machine guns, and one .30-caliber machine gun.

8. Road junction at (433790) defended by one squad,

one bazooka, and one .50-caliber machine gun.

9. Abatis at (390686), 30 mines to be installed

after trees blown.

10. Intersection at (383698) defended by platoon of

9th Canadian Forestry Company, 10 men from 158th Engineer

Combat Battalion, 13 men from 51st Engineer Combat

Battalion, 1 3 men from 440th AAA Weapons Battalion, one

40-mm. gun, one bazooka, and one .50-caliber machine gun.

Enemy air was active over the barrier line on 19

December, strafing Highway N35 north of Marche at

Baillonville (295907) and the N4 road junction near Pisson

[Pessoux] (180903).

Defenses were strengthened on 20 December, and by

2400 on that date the following barrier line had been

established:

1 . Bridge prepared for demolition at (363961).

2. Weak bridge at (341950) defended by a bazooka and

a .30-caliber machine gun.

3.l Piers of destroyed bridge prepared for demolition

at (362961); crossing protected by a .50-caliber machine

gun and bazooka.

4. Masonry bridge at (373717) prepared for demolition.

5. String of mines at (337761).

6. Intersection at (306773) defended by tank retriever with 81-mm. mortar, four railroad cars ready to

push across road, and one .50-caliber machine gun.

7. Intersection at (310815) defended by 40-mm. gun,

and all men and equipment falling back from road from

south and east.

8. Roadblock at Rochefort (202762), with bridge

33
prepared for demolition and defended by 40-mm. gun,

bazooka, one .50-caliber machine gun, and one .30-caliber

machine gun.

9 l Highway N35: Marche-Aye-Humain-Rochefort blocked

to enemy advance from southeast with debris at

intersection (300907); at (295936) with abatis and mines;

and at (279861) culvert prepared for demolition.

10. Roadblock on N4 at (430662). This block was

reported complete at 2230, with one squad of Company A in

position defending it.

11 l Contact was made with one squad of the 299th

Engineer Combat Battalion maintaining a roadblock on

Highway N28 at (392721). This roadblock and its defenses

were then tied in and coordinated with the plan of defense

for the intersection of Highways N4 and N28.

Much of the credit for coordinating the scattered

defenses between Hotton and Marche is due to Captain Karl

G.. Pedersen, the modest and diffident-looking CO of

Company A. When his roadblocks were established about

0400 on 20 December, Captain Pedersen cleared with the CO

of the 158th Engineer Combat Battalion, which was about

two miles south of the junction of N4 and N28. The CO of

the 158th informed Captain Pedersen that there were 15

tanks and an unknown number of infantry approximately five

miles south of his position. About 1300 on 20 December,

the 158th displaced to the west on another mission,

leaving only scattered elements between Captain Pedersen's

roadblocks and the enemy's concentration of troops.

Although 50 Canadian foresters reinforced Captain

Pedersen's unit at 0400 on 21 December, these men were

also called away on another mission at 1510 the same day.

He was reinforced by an unknown major with a bazooka team,

an unknown chief warrant officer with a .50-caliber

machine gun, and one 40-mm. AA [antiaircraft] gun from the

440th AAA Battalion.61

During the days when these roadblocks were held, they

34
were subjected to numerous minor probings by jeeps and

armored vehicles. As with the remainder of the 51st

Engineer Combat Battalion, the successful defense of these

roadblocks hinged on deception. According

Fraser, it was due to "deceiving the enemy

strength of my small, practically isolated

spite of known superiority to my front and

infiltration to my rear." The significance of

to Colonel

as to the

force, in

known enemy

the defense

in the larger picture was that it enabled the 84th

Division to reorganize defensive positions around the city

of Marche and to keep that city out of enemy hands.62

The battle of Hotton occurred on 21 December. Just

before the enemy struck at the Hotton bridge, he attempted

to break through the Company A positions and at Hampteau

overcame resistance put up by a squad of Company A. The

Hampteau defense had been organized by Lieutenant Floyd D.

Wright, platoon leader of the 1st Platoon of Company A .

About 30 yards northeast of the footbridge across the

river, on the road to Soy, a minefield was hastily laid

and the position across the river was outposted with

Private Stanley A. Driggs and his Ml rifle. Thirty to 40

yards from the footbridge, on the southwest side of the

river, a bazooka team of three men and a detonator for the

bridge were placed. Along the Hotton-La Roche [Laroche]

road, two bazooka teams were placed 700 yards apart,

protected by daisy chains of mines. Two .50-caliber

machine guns, half a squad of riflemen, and two tanks were

placed west of the Hotton-La Roche [Laroche] road.63

Three jeep patrols from the 820th Tank Destroyer

Battalion reported that they had received small arms fire

in the vicinity of La Roche [Laroche], that they had

relayed this information to the 2d Platoon of Company A at

Marcourt, and that the 2d Platoon had subsequently blown

their Marcourt bridge. After attempting unsuccessfully to

persuade the 820th to reinforce the 2d Platoon's roadblock

at Marcourt, Lieutenant Wright sent his platoon sergeant,

35
Staff Sergeant Donald A. Bonifay, with an M8 armored car

and one squad (Sergeant Benjamin Ham's) to Marcourt. Task

Force Bonifay arrived at the 2d Platoon at 0130 on 21

December, where Lieutenant Paul Curtis, 2d Platoon leader,

put them out to assist in the defense of the town.

Lieutenant Curtis reported that there had been a brief,

brisk firefight between two half-tracks approaching

the bridge and his own .50-caliber machine guns. No

casualties resulted from this firefight, but through

mistaken identity one guard was killed and one wounded

when they halted an American patrol atMarcourt.

Leaving Sergeant Ham's squad in Marcourt, Sergeant

Bonifay returned to Hampteau just in time to get in on the

excitement there. At 0510, Private Driggs ran back across

the bridge and reported that an armored car was

approaching along the secondary road from the northeast.

The armored car started shelling the high ground behind

and in the village and then started firing its small arms

at the bazooka teams. A battalion staff officer, Captain

Richard F. Huxmann, directed Sergeant Bonifay to blow the

bridge; however, this was impossible because the detonator

had been removed. The shelling set Hampteau on fire, and

by this time the battle of Hotton was commencing and

Colonel Fraser ordered Lieutenant Wright to send his men

 to reinforce Company B at Hotton. Taking a last look at

the burning and completely deserted town of Hampteau at

0900, Sergeant Bonifay made his way back to Hotton on foot

to join the battle that was in progress there.

The sequel to the Hampteau action is that Lieutenant

Paul Curtis, accompanied by Sergeants Joseph H. Ochson and

Harry S. Wimberley, returned in the afternoon in an

attempt to rewire and blow the bridge. Lieutenant Curtis

was killed in the unsuccessful attempt.64

On 21 December bitter fighting took place at the

point (369879) where a vital class 70 bridge spanned the

Ourthe River at Hotton. (Map 5) Hotton is at the junction

36
Map 5

51st Engineer Combat Battalion Defenses,

Hotton Area, 21 December 1944

REAR ECHELON

DESTROYED BY U.S.

PVT. LEE J. ISHMAEL
of N4 (which runs southeast to La Roche [Laroche]) and N28

(which runs northeast toward Barvaux and southwest toward

Marche). The bridge is perpendicular to N4 and connects

N28 on both sides of the river. On the east side of the

river the road to Soy branches off to the northeast.

Along the southern borders of this road are wooded areas

and rising ground. Houses line both sides of the river

and are closely spaced. The main enemy thrusts at Hotton

came from the northeast; from the direction of Soy and

Erezee.65

The sparkplug of the defense of Hotton was Captain

Preston C. Hodges, a veteran graduate of Fort Belvoir's

sixth OCS [Officer Candidate School] class, who had

commanded or been associated with Company B of the 51st

for two years.66 His leadership held together the miscellaneous elements present at the bridge and inspired them

to stand and ward off the enemy attacks. Captain Hodges

remained exposed to small arms and artillery fire during

the battle in order to coordinate the firing of the

various weapons and elements under his command. Although

slightly wounded by a shell fragment during the battle,

Captain Hodges remained at his station until the battle of

Hotton had been won and the town was firmly in Allied

hands.67

The personnel and equipment available to Captain

Hodges for the defense of Hotton initially consisted of

the following: one squad of the 1st Platoon of Company B,

51st Engineers, commanded by First Lieutenant Bruce W.

Jamison; half a squad of men from Company A, 51st

Engineers; a squad of Armored Engineers from the 3d Armored Division, equipped with a 37-mm. antitank gun; two

40-mm. Bofors antiaircraft guns (pressed into service from

the 440th AAA Battalion); and a smattering of bazookas and

.50-caliber machine guns. Most of this equipment and

personnel was on the southwest side of the river bridge.

On the northeast side of the bridge were personnel of the

38
3d Armored Division trains, supported by what appeared to

be a platoon of light tanks and a platoon of medium tanks.

A medical unit also was present on the northeast side of

the river, lining the Barvaux road. This unit was also

part of the 3d Armored Division.68

The Hotton bridge was a two-way timber bridge.

Defense from the northeast side of the bridge and river

was difficult due to limited observation and the

obstruction to movement caused by the buildings of the

town. Positions on the west bank could be observed by the

enemy but were choicer because they allowed freedom of

movement, fields of fire, and better sight of what the

enemy was doing. On the night of 19-20 December,

Lieutenant Jamison prepared this bridge and the Melreux

railroad bridge for demolition. He used 800 pounds of TNT

and 300 pounds of satchel charges on the Hotton bridge,

preparing one abutment and three piers.69

The same night that the bridge had been prepared for

demolition, an enemy patrol of 20 men dressed in American

uniforms advanced on the bridge, and they came down and

started to walk across the bridge. It was never learned

what their mission was, but it was supposed that they were

to blow the bridge.70 (See Appendix A.)

One of the most valuable assets that the small group

of the 51st Engineer Combat Battalion had available at

Hotton was a vehicle from the 7th Armored Division, with a

five-man crew.71 There is disagreement in both oral and

written testimony as to whether this was a tank destroyer

or an M4 medium tank with a 76-mm. gun. All observers and

participants agree it had a 76-mm. gun. They also agree

that its crew did a heroic job in the defense of the

Hotton bridge, away from their unit. It is unfortunate

that none of the Engineers present at the battle of Hotton

have clues to the identity of the tank crew.72

Before daylight on the morning of 21 December,

Lieutenants Wright and Jamison located this armored

39
vehicle in an ordnance detachment on the outskirts of

Hotton. These officers prevailed on the sergeant (tank

commander) to get his tank into action to support the

detachment defending the Hotton bridge. The tank was

employed near the end of the bridge on the west side of

the river, close to a protecting house that shielded its

hull but allowed it a good field of fire.73

Early on the morning of the 21st, Captain Hodges

borrowed a 37-mm. antitank gun from the 23d Armored

Engineers of the 3d Armored Division across the river.

(See e- Map 5.) The crew, according to all observers, was

very hesitant about manning the gun. Private Lee J.

Ishmael, driver for Colonel Fraser, volunteered to fire

the gun and he manned it throughout the battle.74

About 0700 on the morning of 21 December, the enemy

commenced shelling Hotton. Shortly thereafter, a firefight developed between elements of the 3d Armored

Division and enemy armor and infantry coming out of the

woods on the east side of the river. Captain John W.

Barnes, S-3 of the 51st Engineer Combat Battalion, who had

just returned from inspecting roadblocks on Highway N4,

received the information from Lieutenant Wright that

Hampteau had fallen and the group there had been forced

back to Hotton which was being threatened. Captain

Barnes asked for volunteers from Headquarters and Service

Company to go to Hotton and check the enemy vehicles

attempting to break through there. The others in Captain

Barnes' group were Warrant Officer Julius J. Horecka,

Master Sergeant Edward Colley, Technical Sergeant Kenneth

Kelly, Sergeant Arnold Parker, Private Lee J. Ishmael,

Private Peter Serianni, and Private Willis Rackus.

Horecka took these men ahead in a 2 1/2-ton truck. When

they arrived in Hotton there was a small-scale battle in

progress between the 3d Armored and enemy armor.75

The 3d Armored tanks started engaging enemy infantry,

which came out of the woods east of Hotton and up the road

40
on the east side of the Ourthe River. A medium and a

light tank from the 3d Armored started down the Soy road

toward the enemy infantry, but they were both stopped by a

Mark VI tank approaching the bridge from the Soy road.

The Mark VI quickly knocked out the light tank; the M4

fired one shot at the enemy Tiger and then backed into a

building. The enemy tank crippled the 3d Armored medium

tank, and the crew evacuated. The Tiger tank continued

toward the bridge unmolested.76

At this point Private Ishmael manned the 37-mm.

antitank gun, which the crew from the 23d Armored Engineer

Battalion had hesitated to put into action. Ishmael was a

veteran member of the battalion. During late 1942 and

1943, when the battalion had been at Plattsburg Barracks,

Private Ishmael had instructed on the 37-mm. He shot

approximately 16 rounds in three minutes of rapid firing,

during which observers noted a few tracers bounce off the

Mark VI. Three shots hit the tank's bogie wheels, and the

most effective shot wedged between the turret and the

hull. This shell apparently prevented the tank's gun from

turning around.77

Sergeant Kenneth Kelly, who assisted Private Ishmael

in swinging the 37-mm. gun around, also fired at the tank

with a bazooka, which was loaded by Lieutenant Munny Y. M.

Lee. Results were not observed because of the smoke and

dust, but it is believed that the rounds from the 37-mm.

gun knocked the tank out. The crew dispersed, but two

were killed and one captured from the group in the tank.

Sergeant Kelly also observed a 2 1/2-ton truck, hit by

this same German Mark VI, go up in flames.78

About the time that Private Ishmael was dealing with

this tank, Colonel Fraser was leaving the battalion CP in

the Marche area. He had been in close touch with the

situations at Hampteau and Hotton until the wire to Hotton

went out. Colonel Fraser had appealed to the 84th

Division for help to be sent to Hotton When the 84th (at

41
Marche) scoffed at reports of activity at Hotton, Colonel

Fraser put the Hotton telephone close to the Marche line

to allow the 84th to hear the sounds of shelling at

Hotton. Finally, at about 0830, he went to Hotton himself.

In order to coordinate the activities of his battalion

with what the 3d Armored Division was doing on the other

side of the river, Colonel Fraser crossed the bridge and

was isolated in the enemy territory for much of the

morning after the enemy armored spearhead started to

advance toward the bridge. He made his way back safely,

saw that Captain Hodges had the situation well under

control, and then proceeded to Marche to recheck with the

84th Division on reinforcements for Hotton.79

Meanwhile, Captain John W. Barnes, battalion S-3, was

off on another mission. After Captain Barnes had sent a

squad of volunteers from Headquarters and Service Company

to Hotton, he went down N4 to the outskirts of Marche,

where a Captain Siegal of the 523d Ordnance Battalion was

manning an Ml0 at one of the 51st's roadblocks. Captain

Barnes brought the Ml0 back through Marche toward Hotton

to reinforce the position there. He was stopped by the

commanding general of the 84th Division, to whom Captain

Barnes explained the situation. According to Captain

Barnes, "General Alexander R. Bolling told me he wanted

facts and not rumors or hearsay and he would not allow me

to go on with the Ml0 until he knew more of the

situation." General Bolling then dispatched one of his

reconnaissance officers in his personal armored car to

confirm the seriousness of the situation. When the 84th's

troops did arrive, however, it was already 1500 and the

battle was over.80

Captain Hodges states that the three most decisive

actions of the battle of Hotton were the manning of the

37-mm. AT gun by Private Ishmael, the effective firing

done by the stray tank of the 7th Armored Division, and

the bravery of an unknown, unnamed soldier who volunteered

42
to cross the bridge and flush out several tanks with his

bazooka. Captain Hodges

recognize this unknown

opportunity in the heat

and the men from the 51st did not

hero, nor did they have an

of battle to ask his name

they were all loud in their praise of his action.

Private Ishmael had knocked out his tank, mortar

started coming in fairly heavily around the bridge

Another enemy tank started

Erezee toward the bridge;

toward the bridge from the

fired from the 7th Armored

enemy tank approaching from

to edge along the road

, but

After

fire

site.

from

still another came directly

northeast. Three shots were

tank. The third one hit the

the northeast, knocking it out

and killing the crew. On later inspection it was found

that the tank was loaded with U.S. GI equipment. The tank

had reached within 75 yards of the bridge when it was

knocked out. The other enemy tank approaching from Erezee

slid in behind some buildings on the northeast side of the

river. It was close enough to the bridge to menace the

personnel guarding the bridge. Captain Hodges relates

that at this time an unknown soldier approached him at the

bridge and said: "Captain, I'll flush out that tank over

there." "Well, boy, go ahead," Captain Hodges replied.

The unnamed soldier took off alone across the bridge

with a bazooka and two rounds of ammunition in his pocket.

He was seen ducking into a building on the far right

corner of the bridge. Shortly thereafter the personnel at

the bridge heard a smash like a bazooka round and the

enemy tank pulled up between two buildings so that part of

its hull was showing out of an aperture of only two

feet between the buildings. The 7th Armored Division tank

fired accurately through this two-foot opening, destroying

the tank. Expending all but two rounds of its ammunition,

this tank remained in position, unscathed, near the

bridge. Captain Hodges estimates that it destroyed or

damaged at least four enemy tanks and scared away several

others.81

43
During the battle, the wiring on the demolition

charges on the bridge was shot out by enemy shell fire.

Lieutenants Jamison and Wright, without waiting for

orders, entered the shoulder-deep water and, under enemy

small arms fire, repaired the wiring.82

Throughout the morning and during the early afternoon, the tank-infantry battle raged. About 1400, the

enemy armor showed signs that it had had about enough and

started to withdraw, but the sniper small arms fire was

still hot on the northeast side of the bridge. The

situation was finally relieved at 1500 with the arrival of

a task force of the 3d Armored Division under command of

Brigadier General Maurice Rose. The relief force of the

84th Division then appeared on the scene from Marche.

Most of the elements of the 51st Battalion withdrew toward

Marche, having accomplished their mission of holding the

bridge. Half of a squad was left at the Hotton bridge to

blow it if necessary during the ensuing days.83 Captain

Hodges reports that there were frequent arguments between

the commands of the 3d Armored Division and the 84th

Division as to whether the bridge should be blown. In

lieu of an agreement between the generals involved, the

squad at the bridge took no action and refused to blow the

bridge.84

Despite the bitter fighting at Hotton on 21 December,

only two members of the 51st's force were casualties, both

from shell fragments. Captain Hodges received a shell

fragment wound in his leg, while Private Ishmael was

wounded in the hand. (These casualty figures do not

include casualties among the attached personnel who fought

with the 51st at Hotton.)85

The significance of the defense of the Hotton bridge,

which elements of the 51st carried on during the sevenhour battle, is that the actions preserved a key link in

Allied supply lines to forward units, behind which the

84th Division was organizing and arriving at Marche.86
During the next ten days, prior to being relieved by

British troops on 3 January, the companies of the 51st

continued their mission of maintaining roadblocks and

bridge protection along an extended front. On 22

December, a barrier line was installed from Hamoir

(423052) to Hotton (369879), along the Ourthe River,

thence through Marche and southwest to Rochefort. The

line consisted of prepared demolitions in culverts; mines

in roads at critical intersections, combined with bazooka

teams; and 40-mm. AA guns.87

At 1500 on 22 December, Company C, now returned from

its defense of Trois-Ponts, sent a reconnaissance party

along Highway N4 to set up roadblocks. The party consisted of Major Yates, Captain Scheuber, Lieutenant Green,

and Lieutenant Nabors. The men approached southeast of

Marche and were fired on by the lead vehicles of an

enemy armored column at (310805). They stopped their jeep

and advanced on foot and were soon cut off by five enemy

tanks, two half-tracks filled with enemy personnel, and

additional armor that was not actually seen. All officers

but Major Yates escaped by taking off through fields and

avoiding roads. Major Yates, who had only a few days

before returned from the hospital where he had been

confined with a foot injury, could not run and hence hid

in a bush by the road. After two hours he was discovered,

disarmed, and taken prisoner. When the man guarding Major

Yates relaxed his vigil for a moment, Major Yates dived

into a stream beside which they stood, worked his way

downstream under about three feet of water, and escaped

under a hail of small arms fire to return to friendly

lines shortly before 2200 the same night.88

On 22 December, Company A relieved Company B of the

responsibility of roadblocks in the vicinity of Aye,

Humain, and Rochefort; Company B extended its defenses

from Durbuy to Hamoir, taking over from the 300th Engineer

Combat Battalion. (Map 6) The following guards and defen45

sive positions were established and maintained by Company B on 22 December:

(341950)--guard on footbridge;

(390868) --reconnaissance made of Hampteau bridge

(quiet);

(424001)--bridge mined, up and downstream; 

(415985) --footbridge;

(377972) --footbridge;

(360962)--bridge mined;

(341950) --footbridge mined;

(322920)--bridge out;

(362892) --railroad bridge out;

(369879) --bridge mined;

(295932) --abatis;

(407025)--culvert mined; and

(419040)--crater for road and railroad.89

At noon on 22 December, a party led by Lieutenant

Wright proceeded as far a Jemelle, where it was reported

to them that enemy tanks and infantry were in Manogne.

Lieutenant Wright was then ordered to prepare abatis in

the vicinity of (242741) and to mine the road at (243798).

The 3d Platoon of Company A was ordered to prepare

roadblocks on Highway N35 between Jemelle and Marche.

Lieutenant Wright's 1st Platoon of Company A then

commenced a merry chase that eventually carried them

back as far as Givet. After establishing a roadblock at

(242745) in the vicinity of Forrieres, he successfully

moved his platoon to Rochefort, the Aye, and Marche.

Lieutenant Wright returned to Rochefort at 1900 on 22

December to blow a bridge there, accomplished his mission, and returned to Marche. The following morning, he

received orders to repair the Rochefort bridge. While in

the town, the platoon was attacked and driven back to

Givet along with the 84th Division.

The 2d and 3d Platoons of Company A were responsible

for the following defenses prepared and/or maintained on

47
22 December:

(226883)--abatis;

(235889)--bridge mined;

(221894) and (229900) --roadblocks coordinated with

elements of 309th Engineer Combat Battalion:

(236902) --road and bridge mined;

(264411)--bridge mined; coordinated with elements of

309th Engineer Combat Battalion; and

(278915) --bridge and road mined.

Company C strengthened the defenses of the 51st on 23

December by manning the following positions:

(298878) --abatis with string of mines;

(267871)--bridge mined;

(250860)--bridge mined;

(219866)--culvert mined and minefield

of road;

(236875) --road mined; and

(226883)--abatis.

The ensuing days were anticlimactic.

relieved of all duties on the barrier line

on both sides

Company B was

on the Ourthe

River from Hotton to Hamoir, with the exception of the

demolition crew in Hotton. The latter was strengthened on

27 December from half a squad to one officer and 10 EM

[enlisted men], and the bridge was rewired so it could be

demolished from either side. At 0140 on 26 December,

the railroad bridge at Melreux was blown. During the

remainder of the period before being relieved, Company B

maintained a roadblock on Highway N35 south of the

junction at N29 and also maintained a roadblock on N35

north of the junction with N29.

Although the enemy had been held off at Hotton, and

its advance toward Marche on N4 had been delayed, there

was still some enemy activity after 22 December--generally

to the east and southeast, and south and southwest of

Marche. The enemy appeared to be attempting to encircle

Marche and to move to the Meuse River to the west. During

48
the period from 24 December until relieved by elements of

the XXX British Corps on 3 January, the battalion was

attached to the 84th Division in direct support. The

battalion continued to hold a series of roadblocks and

bridges against numerous enemy probings, but experienced

no serious threats.90

 Total battalion casualties for the operation were

five killed, six wounded, and two missing.91

49
Epilogue

bY

Barry W. Fowle

Following the Battle of the Bulge, as the fighting in

the Ardennes became known, the 51st supported a succession

of frontline divisions. In January 1945, the battalion

operated in close cooperation with the 307th Engineer

Combat Battalion of the 82d Airborne Division. Later the

51st worked with the 275th Battalion of the 75th Infantry

Division. The weather rather than the Germans became the

battalion's main foe, as the troops struggled to keep open

the main supply routes in spite of the heavy snowfall and

wind-swept drifts.

In the first two months of 1945, as the Allied armies

pushed east into Germany, the battalion built many

bridges. Most were double-single Baileys. They built at

least seven of these, ranging in length from 50 to 130

feet. They also built a 130-foot double--double Bailey

near Trois-Ponts as well as some treadways and foot

bridges. Some of these they finished under fire.

During the first part of February the battalion

entered Germany in support of the 82d Airborne Division in

its drive toward the east through the Ardennes. In this

sector there were no roads, only woods. The 51st blazed

forest trails, cut firebreaks, and opened third-class

roads to take the pounding of division traffic. The

battalion performed other time-honored sapper roles as

well, clearing obstructions, mines, and booby traps when

needed. On 17 February, recognition for the 51st's part

in stopping the Germans in the Ardennes caught up with the

51
battalion in the form of a Presidential Unit Citation

In March, the battalion was once again at the center

of a critical operation. It was carrying out a routine

road maintenance mission, clearing mines, filling craters,

and moving debris, when it was relieved from direct

support of the 9th Infantry Division. The 51st moved to

Bad Neuenahr in preparation for constructing a heavy

ponton bridge across the Rhine River at Kripp in support

of the seizure of the Ludendorff Bridge at Remagen. Late

at night on the 11th, the 51st completed a 969-foot 25-ton

ponton bridge. The bridge was constructed under harassing

enemy artillery fire and intermittent strafing by enemy

planes. One man was killed and one wounded from Company

C , while two men were killed and one wounded from the

supporting 181st Heavy Ponton Battalion. The bridge was

the second put across the Rhine by the Allies.

Then it was back to road maintenance and bridge

construction, including one extraordinary burst of energy.

On 25 March, Company C constructed a 50-foot double-single

Bailey bridge in the morning and built a 110-foot triplesingle Bailey in the afternoon. After nightfall, the unit

built yet a third bridge, a 50-foot double-single Bailey.

After that remarkable day's work for Company C, it was

back to fixing roads, removing obstacles, constructing

culverts, and posting signs for the advance across

Germany.

In April, the last month of the war, the 51st still

concentrated on road maintenance" For a time, the

battalion supported the 9th Infantry Division. Then it

was reassigned to the 86th. The transfer involved more

than paperwork: the 86th was hundreds of miles away. To 

get to its new assignment, the 51st made a forced motor

march of 255 miles in one day to its new command post in

Petersaurach. Only one vehicle broke down during the

march, a tribute to the care which the battalion took of

its equipment.

52
Shortly after joining the 86th, the battalion became

involved in another major bridging operation, this time

over the Danube River. Company A began the treadway

bridge at Ingolstadt late at night on 26 April. The men

worked past midnight into the early hours of the morning.

All the while, heavy fire came from a barracks building

about 200 feet in front of the landing site. A sniper

with a burp gun almost hit Colonel Fraser while he

supervised construction from the incomplete span. With

the bridge only 40 feet from the far shore, the 300

desperate SS men who had barricaded themselves in the

building were finally driven out by a landing party from

the 86th. At eight o'clock in the morning the 324-foot

treadway was across, just in time for the Germans, now

prisoners of war, to come across.

The battalion was lucky at Ingolstadt. There were no

men killed or wounded. Every commander realized that the

war was coming to an end and hoped to avoid casualties.

But, although the end was in sight, the war still was not

over. On 7 May, just one day before V-E Day, Sergeant

Alex George was killed and T-5 William Schender injured

when a premature blast occurred while destroying unserviceable explosives.

The battalion stayed in Germany through the summer.

It joined in the first stages of the long and arduous

reconstruction task that faced victors and vanquished

alike in Europe, removing rubble from the Main River so

that commercial barge traffic could start anew. In a way

the 51st came full circle that summer. In July the

battalion once again operated sawmills, this time for

peaceful uses rather than for troops on the march. In

early October, active service in Europe ended. On 16

October8 the battalion boarded the SS Eufaula Victory at

Marseille, France, and sailed the next morning. Ten days

later, at Camp Patrick Henry, Virginia, the 51st Engineer

Combat Battalion was inactivated. In existence for just

53
over two years and seven months, the 51st Engineer Combat

Battalion had served overseas 18 days short of two years

and had made a major contribution to Allied success on the

western front.

54
Appendix A

COMMENTS

Headquarters III Corps, G-3

27 March 1945

The 51st Engineer Combat Battalion story has been

checked by the battalion staff, and approved. The

following comments were offered on the points that were

raised by you [Major Richard Shappell, CO, First Army

History Team] and [Major] Frank [Ferriss]:

1 What happened to the three enemy tanks? (See

pages 21-22.) Captain Sam Scheuber, CO of Company C,

states that none of the three enemy tanks attempted to

follow Company C into the town of Trois-Ponts. He says

that he cannot explain this by any fact other than that

they anticipated stronger defenses in Trois-Ponts. Later

the same day that the three tanks approached, P-47s gave

the positions a working over and one armored vehicle--

believed to have been one of the three tanks--was observed

burning for a long period.

2 What happened when the Germans in American

uniforms attempted to cross the bridge? (Code Name:

LITTLE MAN, WHAT NOW?) (See page 39.)

Captain Karl Pedersen, CO of Company A, states that

there was no firefight; no tussle; no real contact. The

enemy merely thought better of the idea when they

discovered that there were real GIs at the bridge.

55
Appendix B

AWARDS DURING WORLD WAR II

Legion of Merit

FRASER, LTC Harvey R. Headquarters

Silver Star

CONNELLY, T/5 Oliver M. Company A

HODGES, CPT Preston C. Company B

MILGRAM, 1LT Joseph E., Jr. Company C

SCHEUBER, CPT Sam C. Company C

YATES, MAJ Robert B. Headquarters

Bronze Star Medal With Oak Leaf Cluster

FRASER, LTC Harvey R. Headquarters

Bronze Star Medal

BONIFAY, S/SGT Donald Company A

CHASTAIN, PFC Winford C. Medical Detachment

CLARK, SGT Fayne B. Company C

COATS, CPT Maurice E. Headquarters

CUNDIFF, SGT William S. Company C

GOLDSMITH, SGT Elvin Company C

GOSSARD, SGT Evers Company C

GREEN, 1LT Richard I. Headquarters

HODGES, CPT Preston C. Company B

ISHMAEL, PVT Lee J. Headquarters & Service Co.

56
JAMISON, 1LT Bruce W.

KECK, T/5 Paul H.

MACK, PFC Jessie R.

MARQUEZ, PFC Jose E.

MORIN, CWO Wilfred G.

MUELLER, 1LT William R.

NABORS, 1LT Fred L.

PEDERSEN, CPT Karl G.

REYNOLDS, SGT Payton E.

Company B

Company C

Company C

Company C

Headquarters & Service Co.

Headquarters

Company C

Company A

Company A

SIFTINGER, SGT John J. Company A

WALKER, PVT Morris S. Company C

WRIGHT, 1LT FLOYD D. Company A

WRIGHT, PFC Philip F. Medical Detachment

YATES, MAJ Robert B. Headquarters

Soldiers Medal

BANKS, T/5 Thomas G. Headquarters & Service Co.

BARNES, CPT J. W. Headquarters

CASH, PFC G. M. Headquarters &1 Service Co.

HENRY, 1LT D. H. Headquarters

MURPHY, 2LT J. A. Company B

RAPER, M/SGT M. L. Headquarters & Service Co.

YATES, MAJ Robert B. Headquarters

57
Appendix C

PRESIDENTIAL UNIT CITATION

Unit citation awarded to battalion per Sec I, GO #29 Hq.,

First U.S. Army, 17 February 1945

The 51st Engineer Combat Battalion, United States

Army, is cited for outstanding performance of duty in

action against the enemy from 17 to 22 December 1944, in

Belgium. When German forces had penetrated deep into

friendly lines on 17 December 1944, and were rolling

westward rapidly, the 51st Engineer Combat Battalion was

ordered into strongpoint defensive positions in the

vicinity of Trois-Ponts, Hotton and Marche, Belgium with

the mission of impeding and containing the enemy advance

at strategic points. Faced by numerically superior forces

in armor, firepower and manpower8 the battalion quickly

constructed and stubbornly defended roadblocks, prepared

vital bridges for demolition and served as infantrymen.

By their determination and devotion to duty, regardless of

the odds, the battalion denied the enemy important avenues

of advance, thus permitting strong friendly forces to move

into counterattack positions. By skillful use of the

weapons at hand, excellent terrain appreciation and the

use of ingenious ruses, the enemy was led to believe that

strong formations confronted them and that they were

being rapidly reinforced. When German tanks attacked

repeatedly, fierce fire from rocket launchers destroyed

them; infantry attacks, supported by intense artillery

barrages, were met by a hail of small arms fire with heavy

losses on enemy ranks; when bridges could no longer be

58
held, they were demolished at the last possible moment,

denying their use to the hostile advancing forces.

Throughout the five-day period, the enemy was never able

to penetrate the defenses manned by the officers and men

of the 51st Engineer Combat Battalion. Their courageous

actions and fortitude contributed materially to the

ultimate defeat of German offensive plans in this area and

are worthy of high praise.

59
Appendix D

FRENCH CROIX DE GUERRE WITH SILVER STAR

GENERAL ORDERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

NO. 43 Washington 25, D.C., 19 December 1950

LIST OF UNITS AND CITATIONS Section II

FRENCH CROIX DE GUERRE WITH SILVER STAR, awarded under

Decision No. 246, 15 July 1946, by the President of

the Provisional Government of the French Republic,

with the following citation: [51st Engr Combat Bn]

An elite unit which attracted special attention in

the course of the German offensive in the Ardennes.

During the period from 12 to 22 December 1944, it was

thrown into the breach, with the mission of holding the

enemy advance in the Ligneuville-Stavelot-Trois Ponts

areas. In spite of a lack of heavy arms and being

attacked by an adversary greatly superior in number, it

held the position which had been assigned to it, thus

giving proof of the finest qualities of courage and

military discipline.

60
Notes

1.. History of the 51st Engr. Combat Bn., on file at

Battalion rear echelon; After-Action Report and S-3

Journal, 51st Engr. Combat Bn.

2. History of the 51st Engr. Combat Bn., on file at

Battalion rear echelon.

3. Interviews, author with Capt. Preston C. Hodges,

CO, Co. B , 51st Engr. Combat Bn., vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945; with Lt. Richard Green, Plat. Ldr.

of Co. C, 51st Engr. Combat Bn., vicinity Roetgen,

Germany, 24 Feb. 1945; and with Lt. Floyd D. Wright, Plat.

Ldr., 1st Plat., Co. A, 51st Engr. Combat Bn., vicinity

Zweifall, Germany, 25 Feb. 1945.

4. S-l Daily Log, After-Action Report, and S-3

Journal, all 51st Engr. Combat Bn.

5. Interview, author with Lt. Col. Harvey R. Fraser,

CO, 51st Engr. Combat Bn., vicinity Zweifall, Germany, 23

Feb. 1945.

6. S-l Daily Log, 51st Engr. Combat Bn.

7. Interview, author with Fraser, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

a. Author's personal observations or conclusions as

a result of talking with a number of officers and men and

examining many records.

9. S-1 Daily Log, 51st Engr. Combat Bn.

10 l Interview, author with Fraser, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945

11. Ibid. Author's personal observations or

conclusions as a result of talking with a number of

officers and men and examining many records.

12. Interview, author with Fraser, vicinity Zweifall,

61
Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

13.. Interview, T/4 Harvey R. George, 2d Information

and History Service (III Corps), with Capt. John W.

Barnes, S-3, 51st Engr. Combat Bn., vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

14. Ibid.; Interviews, author with Hodges, and with

Pvt. Lee J. Ishmael, HQ & Service Co., both vicinity

Zweifall, Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

15. Interviews, author with Maj. Robert B. Yates,

Exec. Ofcr., 51st Engr. Combat Bn., vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 19 Feb. 1945, and vicinity Roetgen, Germany, 24

Feb. 1945; with Capt. Sam Scheuber, CO, Co. C, 51st Engr.

Combat Bn., vicinity Zweifall, Germany, 23 Feb. 1945; and

with Green, vicinity Roetgen, Germany, 24 Feb. 1945

16. Ibid.

17. Interview, author with Col. William E. Ekman, CO,

505th Parachute Inf. Rgt., vicinity Schmidt, Germany, 18

Feb. 1945.

18. 3d Ind. to Ltr., 505th Parachute Inf. Rgt. to

51st Engr. Combat Bn., 24 Dec. 1944, sub: Commendation;

endorsed to Maj. Yates.

19. History of Co. C, 51st Engr. Combat Bn., Dec.

1944.

20 l Interviews, author with Yates, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 19 Feb. 1945, and vicinity Roetgen, Germany, 24

Feb. 1945.

21. Ibid.

22. Author's personal observations or conclusions as

a result of talking with a number of officers and men and

examining many records.

23. Ibid.

24. Interview, author with Scheuber, vicinity Zweifall, Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

25 l Interview, author with Capt. Robert N. Jewett,

S-4, 1111th Engr. Combat Group, vicinity Walheim, Germany,

24 Feb. 1945.

62
26 . Interview, author with Lt. Col. James A. Kirkland, Exec. Ofcr., 1111th Engr. Combat Group, vicinity

Walheim, Germany, 24 Feb. 1945.

27. Ibid.

28. After-Action Report, 291st Engr. Combat Bn., Dec.

19440

29. Interviews, author with Yates, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 19 Feb. 1945, and vicinity Roetgen, Germany, 24

Feb. 1945; and with Green, vicinity Roetgen, Germany, 24

Feb. 1945.

30 l Interviews, author with Jewett, vicinity Walheim,

Germany, 24 Feb. 1945; and with Green, vicinity Roetgen,

Germany, 24 Feb. 1945.

31. Interview, author with Jewett, vicinity- Walheim,

Germany, 24 Feb. 1945.

32. Interview, author with Green, vicinity Roetgen,

Germany, 24 Feb. 1945.

33. Ibid.; Interview, author with Jewett, vicinity

Walheim, Germany, 24 Feb. 1945.

34. Ibid.

35. Interview, author with Jewett, vicinity Walheim,

Germany, 24 Feb. 1945.

36. Interview, author with Kirkland, vicinity Walheim, Germany, 24 Feb. 1945.

37. Interviews, author with Jewett, vicinity Walheim,

Germany, 24 Feb. 1945; and with Green, vicinity Roetgen,

Germany, 24 Feb. 1945.

38. Interviews, author with Yates, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 19 Feb. 1945, and vicinity Roetgen, Germany, 24

Feb. 1945.

39. Ibid.

40. Interviews, author with Scheuber, vicinity Zweifall, Germany, 23 Feb. 1945; and with Green, vicinity

Roetgen, Germany, 24 Feb. 1945.

41. Interview, author with Green, vicinity Roetgen,

Germany, 24 Feb. 1945.

63
42 l Ibid.

 43. Interviews, author with Yates, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 19 Feb. 1945, and vicinity Roetgen, Germany, 24

Feb. 1945.

 4. Interview, 4 author with Scheuber, vicinity Zweifall, Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

45. Interview, author with Kirkland, vicinity Walheim, Germany, 24 Feb. 1945.

46. S-l Daily Log, 51st Engr. Combat Bn.

47 l After-Action Report, 291st Engr. Combat Bn., Dec.

1944.

48 l Interview, author with Scheuber, vicinity Zweifall, Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

49. Interview, author with Ekman, vicinity Schmidt,

Germany, 18 Feb. 1945.

50. S-l Daily Log, 51st Engr. Combat Bn.

51. Interviews, author with Yates, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 19 Feb. 1945, and vicinity Roetgen, Germany, 24

Feb. 1945; After-Action Report and S-3 Journal, 51st Engr.

Combat Bn.

52. Interview, author with Scheuber, vicinity Zweifall, Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

53 l Citation for Lt. Joseph B. Milgram, Jr., files of

51st Engr. Combat Bn.

54. After-Action Report and S-3 Journal, 51st Engr.

Combat Bn.

55. Interview, author with Hodges, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

56. S-l Daily Log, 51st Engr. Combat Bn.

57. Interview, author with Fraser, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

58. Ibid.

59. After-Action Report and S-3 Journal, 51st Engr.

Combat Bn.

60 l Interview, author with Wright, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 25 Feb. 1945.

64
61.l After-Action Report and S-3 Journal, 51st Engr.

Combat Bn.; Interview, author with Capt. Karl G. Pedersen,

CO, Co A, 51st Engr. Combat Bn., vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

62. Interview, author with Fraser, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

63. Interviews, George with S/Sgt. Donald A. Bonifay,

Plat. Sgt., 1st Plat., Co. A; and with Pvt. Wilbur H.

Hofmann, Radio Operator, Co. A, both vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945; and Interview, author with Wright,

vicinity Zweifall, Germany, 25 Feb. 1945.

64 l Interviews, George with Bonifay, and with Hofmann, both vicinity Zweifall, Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

65. Interviews, author with Fraser, and with Hodges,

both vicinity Zweifall, Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

66. Ibid.

67. Interview, author with Fraser, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

68. Ibid.; Interview, author with Hodges, vicinity

Zweifall, Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

69. Interview, author with Hodges, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 2 3 Feb. 1945.

70. Interviews, George with S/Sgt. Alex George, Plat.

Sgt., 3d Plat., Co. B, 51st; with S/Sgt. Andrew B. Engle,

Plat. Sgt., 1st Plat., Co. B, 51st; with Cpl. Loren H.

Porter, Asst. Squad Ldr., 2d Plat., Co. B; and with Cpl.

George W. Bray, C&R Driver, Co. B, 51st, all vicinity

Zweifall, Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

71. Interview, author with Hodges, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

72. Author's personal observations or conclusions as

a result of talking with a number of officers and men and

examining many records.

73. S-l Daily Log, 51st Engr. Combat Bn.

74. Interview, author with Hodges, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

65
75 0 Interviews, George with Barnes, and with T/Sgt.

Kenneth Kelly, S-3 Sect., 51st Engr. Combat Bn., both

vicinity Zweifall, Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

76. Interviews, author with Hodges, and with Ishmael,

both vicinity Zweifall, Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

77. Interview, author with Ishmael, vicinity Zweifall, Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

78. Interview, George with Kelly, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

79. Interview, author with Fraser, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

80. Interview, George with Barnes, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

81. Interview, author with Hodges, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

82. History of Co. B, 51st Engr. Combat Bn. Dec.

1944.

83 l History of the 51st. Engr. Combat Bn., on file at

Battalion rear echelon.

84. Interview, author with Hodges, vicinity Zweifall,

Germany, 23 Feb. 1945.

85. S-1 Daily Log, 51st Engr. Combat Bn.

86 l Author's personal observations or conclusions as

a result of talking with a number of officers and men and

examining many records.

87. After-Action Report and S-3 Journal, 51st Engr.

Combat Bn.

88. Ibid.; Interviews, author with Yates, vicinity

Zweifall, Germany, 19 Feb. 1945, and vicinity Roetgen,

Germany, 24 Feb. 1945.

89. After-Action Report and S-3 Journal, 51st Engr.

Combat Bn.

90. Ibid.

91 l S-l Daily Log, 51st Engr. Combat Bn.

66
mI I I ql I

US Army Corps

of Engineers

EP 870-1 -38

APRIL 1988