alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Summary of Director's Compensation Benefits, effective 7/1/04



 EXHIBIT 10.08 
  
 SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION BENEFITS 
  
 EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2004 
  
 CASH COMPENSATION 
  

	 	1.	Each director shall receive an annual retainer of $25,000. 

  

	 	2.	Directors who serve on the Compensation or Audit Committees will receive and additional annual retainer of $20,000. Directors who serve on committees other than the Compensation or
Audit Committees will receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000. 

  

	 	3.	Compensation and Audit Committee Chairpersons will receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000. The additional annual retainer for Chairperson positions on committees other
than the Compensation or Audit Committees will be $5,000. 

  

	 	4.	There will be no meeting fees for director attendance of the five scheduled Board meetings per year. For each Special Meeting of the Board called pursuant to proper notice, in
person or by telephone, beyond the five scheduled Board meetings per year, each director will receive a meeting fee of $2,000. There will be no meeting fees for any special committee meetings. 

  
 STOCK OPTIONS 
  

	 	1.	Upon election as a director, the director shall receive a stock option grant of 50,000 shares (an “Initial Grant”) in accordance to the Company’s 1998
Directors Stock Option Plan (the “Directors Plan”) (subject to stockholder approval at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders). 

  

	 	2.	Each director will receive an annual refresh option grant of 25,000 shares in accordance to the Directors Plan (a “Succeeding Grant”) on the anniversary of
the Initial grant (or most recent grant if such director did not receive an Initial Grant) (subject to stockholder approval at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders) so long as such director has served continuously as a member of the Board of
Directors since the date of the Initial Grant (or most recent grant if such director did not receive an Initial Grant). 

  

	 	3.	The exercise price of any option granted under the Directors Plan shall be 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.


  

	 	4.	All options granted under the Directors Plan will vest as to 6.25% of the shares each quarter after the date of grant, provided the optionee continues as a director or, if the
Company so specifies in the grant, as a consultant of the Company.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2376 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

80 Killian Road in Massapequa, New York, as the ‘‘Gerard A. Fiorenza 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2006 

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 80 Killian Road in Massapequa, New York, 

as the ‘‘Gerard A. Fiorenza Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GERARD A. FIORENZA POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 80 Killian Road in Massapequa, 

6 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Gerard 

7 A. Fiorenza Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 2376 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Gerard A. Fiorenza 

3 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### § 29.2506 Clean.

Tobacco is described as clean when it contains only a normal amount of sand or soil particles. Leaves grown on the lower portion of the stalk normally contain more dirt or sand than those from higher stalk positions. (See Rule 4, § 29.2620.)
#### § 3550.111 Appraisals (loans only).

An appraisal is required when the section 504 debt to be secured exceeds $15,000 or whenever RHS determines that it is necessary to establish the adequacy of the security. RHS may charge an appraisal fee. Appraisals must be made in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices. When other real estate is taken as additional security it will be appraised if it represents a substantial portion of the security for the loan.
Exhibit 10.1
 CONFORMED COPY
  
 Agreement to Repurchase Notes Issued Pursuant to NPA
  NPA Company Guarantors Purchaser) Collateral Agent 2010 Notes 2011
Notes 2012 Notes 2013
Notes Notes
  Purchase Purchase
Price




---



##### 



Purchase Date Purchase Notice provided, however, that provided that End Date
  2




---



##### 



Very truly yours,SNTC HOLDING, INC.,  IN ITS CAPACITY AS PURCHASER AND  HOLDER OF 100% OF THE NOTESBy
    /s/ RoseAnn StampeName:
    RoseAnn StampeTitle:
    Assistant SecretarySNTC HOLDING, INC.,  AS COLLATERAL AGENTBy
    /s/ RoseAnn StampeName:
    RoseAnn StampeTitle:
    Assistant Secretary 3




---



##### 



COMPANY
  By
    /s/ Michael MarinoName:
    Michael MarinoTitle:
    Director GUARANTORS
  By
    /s/ Michael MarinoName:
    Michael MarinoTitle:
    Director  By
    /s/ Michael MarinoName:
    Michael MarinoTitle:
    Director 4
TIME	TODAY TOTAL	TIME

PREFLIGHT	PERFORMED	BY

CEILING PA DA

TOTAL	TIME	TODAY

FLIGHT	NO.	6

NAME D HRS

FLIGHT	NO.	5

NAME D HRS

REMARKS

D HRS

FLIGHT	NO.	2

D NAME HRS

AVIONICS	TYPE	AND	S/N ENGINE	MAKE/MODEL/FUEL ELEVATION TEMP

FLIGHT	TIME

																																												NMSU	UAS	FLIGHT	TEST	CENTER SHEET	#

1

2

APM	Ver.	2.6

FLIGHT	INFORMATION

TAKEOFF LANDING

WIND	SPEED

WIND	DIR

3D	RoboCcs	X8 3D	RoboCcs	2830	850Kv,	LiPo

FLT	# ACFT	# FUEL	ON FUEL	OFF FUEL	USED BURN	RATE GCS	On/Off

DATE SYSTEM	NAME

3

4

5

PERSONNEL	DATA

FLIGHT	LOG	V1	19	OCT	12

FLIGHT	NO.	3 FLIGHT	NO.	4

NAME D HRS NAME

6

FLIGHT	NO.	1

NAME HRS D
TIME	TODAY TOTAL	TIME

FLIGHT	NO.	5 FLIGHT	NO.	6 REMARKS

NAME D HRS NAME D HRS

NAME D HRS NAME D HRS NAME D HRS NAME D HRS

TOTAL	TIME	TODAY PREFLIGHT	PERFORMED	BY

PERSONNEL	DATA

FLIGHT	NO.	1 FLIGHT	NO.	2 FLIGHT	NO.	3 FLIGHT	NO.	4

6

5

4

3

2

1

FLIGHT	INFORMATION

FLT	# ACFT	# TAKEOFF LANDING FLIGHT	TIME FUEL	ON FUEL	OFF FUEL	USED BURN	RATE GCS	On/Off

3D	RoboCcs	X8 3D	RoboCcs	2830	850Kv,	LiPo

WIND	SPEED CEILING PA DA

DATE SYSTEM	NAME AVIONICS	TYPE	AND	S/N ENGINE	MAKE/MODEL/FUEL ELEVATION TEMP WIND	DIR

																																												NMSU	UAS	FLIGHT	TEST	CENTER SHEET	#

APM	Ver.	2.6

FLIGHT	LOG	V1	19	OCT	12
ENGINE	MAKE/MODEL

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

STATUS SIGNATURE STATUS

STATUS

ACFT	HRS

STATUS STATUS

ACFT	HRS

STATUS STATUS

STATUS

ACFT	HRS

STATUS STATUS

ACFT	HRS

STATUS STATUS

ACFT	HRS

STATUS STATUS

ACFT	HRS

STATUS STATUS

DATE

LAST	SOFTWARE	CODE	VERSION

AIRCRAFT BASE	STATION LAPTOP

DESCREPANCY REPAIR

DATE

DATE

DATE

DATE

ACFT	HRS

STATUS

ACFT	HRS

DATE

DATE

DATE

ACFT	HRS

STATUS

SYSTEM	DATA

DATE ACFT 3D	RoboCcs	X8 ACFT	# U434455 AIRCRAFT	TIME SHEET	#

DATE

3DR	2830	850Kv ENGINE	S/N N/A ENGINE	HOURS LANDINGS

MAINT	LOG	V1	19	OCT	12
ENGINE	MAKE/MODEL

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

STATUS

ACFT	HRS

STATUS STATUS

STATUS

ACFT	HRS

STATUS STATUS

ACFT	HRS

STATUS STATUS

STATUS STATUS

ACFT	HRS

STATUS STATUS

ACFT	HRS

STATUS STATUS

DATE

DATE

DESCREPANCY REPAIR

ACFT	HRS

STATUS STATUS

ACFT	HRS

SYSTEM	DATA

DATE ACFT 3D	RoboCcs	X8 ACFT	# U434455 AIRCRAFT	TIME SHEET	#

DATE

DATE

3DR	2830	850Kv

DATE

DATE

DATE

DATE

DATE

ACFT	HRS

STATUS

ACFT	HRS

STATUS

ENGINE	S/N N/A ENGINE	HOURS LANDINGS

LAST	SOFTWARE	CODE	VERSION

AIRCRAFT BASE	STATION LAPTOP

MAINT	LOG	V1	19	OCT	12
450044568410107COMMONWEALTHOFPENNSYLVANIAPvOIcsNO.STO—521REV.12:88PUBLICATIONSAUTHORIZATIONANDINVOICEPUBLICATIONSAUTHORIZATION(Tobecompletedbyagency):TO:TVit!VTribuaeFRRE8CY)1ThPN/NI4g5947FederalCourtBureauofAirQualityMeadville,PA16335/‘1I2S12thFloorHarrisburg,PA17105HEREWITHISENCLOSEDCOPYFORPUBUCAT1ONOFADVERTISEMENTFORPROPOSALSTOTYPEOFADLiEMPLOYPURCHASECONTRACTSELLCLASSIFIEDLEGALNOTICEPI.JBUSHADVERTISEMENT(NO.OFTIMES)MAXIMUMNO.OFLINESDATEORDERNO.1December6,2009DATESOFiNSERTiONSIGNiJIREFORAGENDecember10,2U0./...You,asvendor,areauthorizedtopublishthisadvertisementinyournewspaper,subjecttothetermsofthisorder,asfollows:Advertisementtobepublishedinregularadvertisingcolumns,nopositionspecified;captionoftwolinesandsignaturetobeincapitalsandsubjectmatterandtitleofofficer.tobesetsolidintyperegularlyusedby_yournewspaperforpublic(gal)noticeadvertising;chargetobemadeattheratechargedtoandpaidbycommercialadvertisersformattersimilarlysetandoccupyingsimilarspace;advertisementtoberunintheeditionsspecifiedabove.Vendoragreesthat,intheperformanceofanycontractawardedtoithereunder,saidvendorwillnotdiscriminateagainstanyemployeorotherpersonsonaccountofrace,color,sex,religiouscreed,ancestry,ageornationaloriginandthattheCommonwealth,uponreceiptofsatisfactoryevidenceofsuchdiscrimination,shallhavetherighttocancelsaidcontract.Returnthiscopyatonceifyouwillnotacceptthisadvertisementunderthetermssetforth.ProofofadvertisingintheformofatearsheetmustbeincludedonParts1,2&3.Returnoriginalandtwocopies(signedbytheeditororpublisher)toAgencylistedabove.Part1mustbenotarized.Part4isyours.Commonwealthtobebilledonlyforactualnumberofprintedlinespublished.ACCOUNTFUNDDEPTAPPYEARLOGORGCOSTFUNCTIONORJAMOUNTCODE5?2oo7I7o9o4QJ/Q3?7C7I&Vcc37/lNplCE(Tobecompletedbypublisher):..DATEOFINSERTIONACTUALNOOFPRINTEOUNESCOSTPERLINETOTALAMOUNTistAd/./D 

# i/9);2ndAd/‘LI71€,O/3rdAdSOCGRANDTOTAL--.417).‘PAS]’ETEARSHEETHER...--..-:.,,-.,ConmonwealtlpofPertsylvaniaCountyof“Lt..1•Beforeme,thesubscriber,aNotaryPublicinandforsaidcounty,personallycme0ñwhobclngdul.vsworrl.doth..deposeandsaythatheis*U.‘i•1’E‘-‘•r1\.:thecA\1’—I-‘/ageneralnewspaperpublishedatiYeoj/..335thattheadvertisement,ofwhichtearsheetisattachedhereto,waspublishedintheregularadvertisingcolumnsofsaidnewspaper,intheeditionsofsaidnewspaper,inallrespectsasorderedandinvoicedabove;andthattheCommonwealthisnotchargedthereforataratehigherthanischargedanyordinarycommercialadvertiserforasimilaramountofmatteroccupyingsimilarspaceandsetinasimilarmanner,insaidnewspaper.ornandubscribedbeforemethis________________dayof.IA?CiYt)2001NOTARYPUBLICMycommissionexpires‘ThisaffidavitmustbemadebytheOwner,Publisher,orthedesignatedagentoftheownerorpublisher. 

# 152200(-.,,fJISIGNATUREOFAFF1ARTVENDORCHECKTRANSMITTAL
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CRAIG LEGGON, JR,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5539-LC-HTC

ANTHONY S. WILEY,

T. E. A. BEERS,

Defendants.

/

ORD ER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report

and Recommendation dated August 18, 2021 (ECF No. 56). The parties have been

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that

it should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. 56)

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-05539-LC-HTC Document 59 Filed 09/20/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF Doc. 47, is

GRANTED.

3. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment on all claims in favor of

Defendants Beers and Wiley.

4. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of September, 2021.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv5539-LC-HTC

Case 3:20-cv-05539-LC-HTC Document 59 Filed 09/20/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 3430.504 Project types and priorities.

For each RFA, NIFA may develop and include the appropriate project types and priority areas based on stakeholder input and as deemed appropriate by NIFA, in consultation with the Advisory Board, and that involve integrated research, extension, and education activities. Duration and amount of grants may vary depending on the type of project.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.25

                                LITTELFUSE, INC.
                    SUMMARY OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

      The compensation of executive officers of Littelfuse, Inc. (the "Company")
primarily consists of three variable components: base salary, a potential cash
bonus under the Company's annual incentive compensation program, and stock
options or other awards under the 1993 Stock Plan for Employees and Directors of
the Company (the "Stock Plan").

SALARIES

      The base salaries for Mr. Gordon Hunter, who assumed the offices of
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer as of January 1,
2005, and each of the other executive officers named below are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name and Principal Positions                Base Salary
-------------------------------------       -----------
<S>                                         <C>
Gordon Hunter, Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer       $   450,000

Philip G. Franklin, Vice President,         $   285,000
Operations Support and Chief
Financial Officer

David R. Samyn, Vice President and          $   240,000
General Manager of the Automotive
Business Unit

Elizabeth C. Calhoun, Vice President,       $   210,000
Human Resources

Kenneth R. Audino, Vice President,
Organizational Development and              $   190,000
Total Quality Management
</TABLE>

ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

<PAGE>

      The target amounts, financial objectives and individual performance
objectives under the annual incentive compensation program have not yet been,
but are expected to be, established for 2005.

OTHER BENEFITS

      Each of the officers named above is eligible to participate in the
Company's employee benefit plans applicable to executive officers, including the
Stock Plan, the Company's Retirement Plan, as amended, the 401(k) Savings Plan,
and the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, in accordance with the terms and
conditions of such plans. These officers also are parties to Change of Control
Employment Agreements that, among other things, entitle them to payments upon
severance or upon a change of control of the Company.

      These officers also receive certain personal benefits from the Company,
the value of which is less than $50,000 for each of such officers.

WHERE MORE INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND

      Each of the plans and agreements mentioned herein and the forms of awards
thereunder are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended January 1, 2005 (the "Form 10-K"). These plans and agreements
will be discussed further in the Company's Proxy Statement relating to the 2005
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be incorporated by reference into
this Form 10-K when filed.

                                       2
(January *26,*1967)

#### In the Matter of Harry De Leyer, Respondent, v. American Horse Shows Association, Inc., Appellant.

Order and judgment (one paper) appealed from remitting the proceedings to the respondent-appellant, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to respondent-appellant, and the petition is dismissed. In this proceeding the petition in effect concedes conduct which would amount to a violation of the rules and regulations of the respondent-appellant association. Special Term apparently considered the violation charged to be a minor one and felt that the penalty imposed for such violation was too harsh. In so doing the court substituted its judgment for that of the association, and that it may not do unless the penalty imposed can be deemed to be an abuse of discretion (see CPLR 7803, subd 3). On this record we may not come to such conclusion. Indeed, there is ample basis to consider the violations charged, and proven by the facts, to be serious violations of the respondents’ rules, and we cannot say that the penalty imposed was unjustified or too severe in the circumstances. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Steuer, Capozzoli and Rabin, JJ.
#### § 29.3681 Applicable standard sizes.

| Types 35, 36, 37 and 95 |
| --- |
| A1, A2, A3 | 2, 3 |
| B1, B2, B3, B4, B5 | 1, 2, 3 |
| C1, C2, C3, C4, C5 | 1, 2, 3 |

[51 FR 40408, Nov. 7, 1986]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RICHARD MATHIS,

Petitioner,

v. 4:20cv304–WS/ZCB

RICKY D. DIXON,

Respondent.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 23) docketed April 10, 2024. The magistrate judge recommends that the

petitioner’s petition (ECF No. 1) for writ of habeas corpus be denied and that this

case be dismissed. The petitioner has filed no objections to the report and

recommendation.

Having reviewed the record, this court has determined that the magistrate

judge's report and recommendation is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 23) is

Case 4:20-cv-00304-WS-ZCB Document 24 Filed 05/22/24 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The petitioner’s petition (ECF No. 1) for writ of habeas corpus is hereby

DENIED.

 3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “Petitioner’s petition for writ of

habeas corpus is denied, and the case is dismissed.”

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

5. The clerk shall close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of May , 2024.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00304-WS-ZCB Document 24 Filed 05/22/24 Page 2 of 2
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40316 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
NEFI RIZO

- REYES , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12

- CR

- 1308

- 1

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Nefi Rizo

- Reyes was convicted by a jury of illegal reentry following prior deportation and was sentenced below the advisory guidelines range to 57 months of imprisonment. He maintains that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. Because he preserved his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, our review is de novo. See United States v. Frye , 489 F.3d 201, 207 (5th Cir. 2007).

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40316 Document: 00512905503 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/16/2015No. 14

- 40316

Rizo

- Reyes challenges whether the Government proved that he was an alien at the time of his illegal reen try. He argues that the sole issue is whether the evidence established that his parents were married before his birth , a fact that would render him subject to more exacting resid ency requirements that he cannot satisfy

. See 8 U.S.C. § § 1401 , 1409. Rizo

- Reyes maintains that the evidence equally supported that his parents were not married at the time of his birth and, thus, he is entitled to an acquittal. When the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the Government, a rational jury could ha ve found that it was sufficient to uphold Rizo

- Reyes’s conviction. See United States v. Vargas

- Ocampo , 747 F.3d 299, 301 (5th Cir.) (en banc) , cert. denied , 135 S. Ct. 170 (2014) ; United States v. Terrell , 700 F.3d 755, 760 (5th Cir. 2012), cert. denied , 133 S. Ct. 1834 (2013)

. The Government presented a marriage certificate showing that Rizo

- Reyes’s parents were married in Mexico in 1974, which preceded Rizo

- Reyes’s birth in 1978. While Rizo

- Reyes offered contrary evidence suggesting that his parents

we re not married at the time of his birth, the record supports, and we must presume, that the jury resolved any conflict in favor of the Gov ernment

. See Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307, 326 (1979)

. We must defer to the jury’s finding and its construction of the evidence. Id

. Rizo

- Reyes’s reliance on the “equipoise rule” is misguided because we have abandoned that standard in evaluating sufficiency claims. See Vargas

- Ocampo , 747 F.3d at 301

- 02. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRM ED.

2 Case: 14-40316 Document: 00512905503 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/16/2015
1.705 Supersession and modification.       (a)                    						            If a D&F is superseded by another D&F, that action shall not render invalid any action taken under the original D&F prior to the date of its supersession.                                          (b)                    						            The contracting officer need not cancel the solicitation if the D&F, as modified, supports the contract action.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1.7 - Determinations and Findings
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CROUCHING TIGER HIDDEN DRAGON INVESTMENT GROUP LLC,

Appellant,

v.

SHORE WINDOW CLEANING LLC, and ALEX SHORE,

Appellees.

No. 4D22-2353

[March 2, 2023]

Appeal of a non-final order from the County Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Melanie Dale Surber, Judge; L.T. 

Case No. 502020CC004995XXXXSB.

Barry S. Mittelberg of Barry S. Mittelberg, P.A., Coral Springs, for 

appellant.

David Rosenberg of Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, 

PLLC, Boca Raton, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 400.681 Written payment agreement. ( a ) Written payment agreements shall: ( 1 ) Require scheduled installment payments that will allow for full repayment of the debt within the time frame allotted in paragraph (a)(2) of this section;
( 2 ) Not exceed two years in duration; and
( 3 ) Not be modified, replaced, or consolidated after it has been executed in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) To avoid being determined to be ineligible through the execution of a written payment agreement: ( 1 ) For a debt arising from any unpaid premium, administrative fees, or catastrophic risk protection fees: ( i ) Only one written payment agreement is permitted per termination date. A written payment agreement may cover multiple crops provided they all have the same termination date; and
( ii ) The written payment agreement must be signed by both parties, the debtor and the insurance provider or FCIC, as applicable, on or before the termination date specified in the applicable policy to prevent an ineligible determination for a delinquent debt.
( 2 ) For all other debts, the written payment agreement must be signed by both parties, the debtor and the insurance provider or FCIC, as applicable, on or before the due date specified in the notice to the person of the amount due to prevent an ineligible determination for a delinquent debt.