alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2320 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2320

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To make available funds included in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 
for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program for fiscal year 2006, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDS FOR LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 9001 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``for a 1-time only obligation and 
                expenditure'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``$250,000,000 
                for fiscal year 2007'' and inserting ``$500,000,000 for 
                fiscal year 2006''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ``$750,000,000 
                for fiscal year 2007'' and inserting ``$500,000,000 for 
                fiscal year 2006'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c);
            (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Limitation.--None of the funds made available under this 
section may be used for the planning and administering described in 
section 2605(b)(9) of the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 
(42 U.S.C. 8624(b)(9)).''; and
            (4) in subsection (c) (as redesignated by paragraph (2)), 
        by striking ``September 30, 2007'' and inserting ``September 
        30, 2006''.

            Passed the Senate March 7, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2320

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To make available funds included in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 
for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program for fiscal year 2006, 
                        and for other purposes.
```
DEWEY KESSLER

,
Appellant,

v.

STAGE CALL, INC. AND TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY

,
Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 5445

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 21, 2014.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation C laims

. Thomas W. Sculco , Judge

.
Date of Accident: February 25, 2012.

Bill McCabe , Longwood, and Gary J. Boynton, Winter Park , for Appellant.

Justin R. Crum, Orlando

, and Thomas H. McDonald of Law Office of Jack D. Evans, Orlando, for Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF and ROWE, JJ., PARKER, GREGORY S., ASSOCIATE JUDGE, CONCUR.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ismael Martell, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on December 1, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Concur—Birns, J. P., Ross, Lupiano and Bloom, JJ.

Fein, J.,

concurs in the result in the following memorandum: I concur in result on constraint of *People v Pickett*(71 AD2d 575), in which I dissented. Defendant was arrested on an unrelated charge on May 9, 1978 at about 11:00 p.m. He was taken to the holding pens at the Bronx Criminal Court awaiting arraignment. On May 11, 1978, prior to arraignment on the unrelated charge, defendant was removed from the court holding pen, without court order, and taken to the 42nd Precinct and placed in the lineup in which he was identified as one of the perpetrators of the subject crime. Prior to the lineup he indicated to the police officer that he wished to have counsel. The record is equivocal as to whether counsel was requested for the unrelated charge, or for the lineup or possible questioning with respect to the subject charge. In my view it is immaterial which version of the testimony one accepts. I believe the right to counsel attached prior to the lineup and was not waived. It is now settled that defendant would have been entitled to counsel before the lineup if a court order had been obtained *536authorizing his removal from the court pens to the precinct. "Judicial action” had intervened at a "critical stage” of the proceedings *(People v Coleman, 43*NY2d 222). As that case indicates, had defendant been arraigned on the unrelated charge and counsel retained or assigned, defendant’s right to consult with such counsel prior to the lineup could not properly have been denied (see *People v Settles,*46 NY2d 154, 165). As I stated in my dissent in *People v Pickett (supra),*I believe the happenstance that the police were able to remove defendant to the precinct in which the lineup occurred without a court order did not make the lineup less "critical” to this defendant than it was to Coleman in his case. Defendant was entitled to counsel at the lineup. In my view the suppression court should have ruled that the lineup identification was to be excluded and should have determined whether or not the remaining identification testimony was tainted by the lineup identification. However, in the light of the majority determination in *People v Pickett (supra),*I am constrained to concur in result.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JASON WAYNE MCDIVITT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv3773-MCR-MJF

ANDREW M. SAUL,

Defendant.

/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation dated April 26, 2021. ECF No. 25. The parties have been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should 

be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

Case 3:20-cv-03773-MCR-MJF Document 26 Filed 06/10/21 Page 1 of 2
2. Plaintiff shall recover costs in the amount of $421.06, and attorney fees 

of $7,062.04 for time expended by his counsel in representing him before the United 

States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The fee award is subject 

to an offset to satisfy any disqualifying debt that Plaintiff owes to the United States.

3. If Plaintiff receives all or any portion of the EAJA fee award, Defendant 

shall mail it to Plaintiff in care of his attorney, Sarah H. Bohr, 2337 Seminole Road, 

Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of June 2021.

s/M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-03773-MCR-MJF Document 26 Filed 06/10/21 Page 2 of 2
OFFICF pF ^,iR AND RACiiATIQN

Casey Gadbury, Director Offiee of the National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221

Dear Mr. Gadbury:

We received your letter dated January 28, 2008, requesting the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the revised draft recertification letter you plan to issue to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). Your request is in aecordance with the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) procedures that are intended to ensure that the Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site certifications correlate appropriately with EPA approvals for waste charaeterization activities at DOE transuranic (TRU) waste generator sites.

On November 2, 2005 (for contact handled (CH) waste) and January 12, 2007 (for remote handled (RH) waste), EPA issued final baseline inspection reports and letters approving the INL CCP waste characterization programs (EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49, Item II-A4-59 (CH) and Item II-A4-72 (RH)). EPA has also received and reviewed tiering reports covering the waste charaeterization program implemented by CCP at INL and have found all changes made to be acceptable. Your draft recertification aceurately reflects our recent approval to include 56 RH waste containers from K Cell to waste stream ID-ANLE-S5000.

EPA concurs that the waste characterization equipment, procedures and waste streams encompassed in DOE's draft recertification letter comport with all of EPA's existing approvals for CH and RI I waste at 1NL-CCP.

(ntemei Address (URL) - ht#p:iJwww.epa.go

~ z R®cyeledt6iecynlable a?I#aRed ;xlth Vega€ahle oi1 Base6la,ks on Recycled °aper fMinlrsu.As 3o;E Posiconsurtu;r;'I'hank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft recertification letter

for INL-CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Bd Feltcorn at (202) 343- 9422.

Sincerel y,


# O j ~~x 2 ~ Tom Peake, Acting Director Center for Federal Regulations

cc: Electronic Distribution Ava Holland, CBFO Vernon Daub, CBFO Courtland Fesmire, CBFO J. R. Stroble, CBFO Norma Castaneda, CBFO Martin Navarrete, CBFO Dennis Miehls, CBFO Allison Pangle, CTAC Wayne Ledford, CTAC Steve Zappe, NMED
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350of Chapter 63**

**of Title 18 of the United StatesCode**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of PharmAthene, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David P. Wright,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto the best of my knowledge:

 
| 1.     |   | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange                                  |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     |   | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 
| /s/ David P. Wright          |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| **David  P. Wright**         |   |
| **Chief  Executive Officer** |   |
| November 13, 2009       |   |

 

----
Genera l Counse l U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n Offic e o fth e Secretar

yo fTransportatio n 40 0Sevent hSt . S,W . Washingto nD

C 2059 0 Joann e Petri e 202-366-931 5 Dbcke t Managemen t Facility : U.S . Dept . o f Transpbr'atip n 120 0 Ne wjerse yAvenu e S.E. , Wes t Buildin g Groun d Floor , Roo mW12-140 , Washingto n D.C . 20590-000 1 Writ e Attention : Rober t C.Ashby Above , nea r th e Address : 

# mo^i

: /

Subject : Etoppse d Tim e Zon e Change ; 

## /)£IT : 

# ObK:io(a-QqH ' Fina l Decision : Shoul d b e o n a Ballo t fo r Peopl e t o Decid e b

ya Vot e , o n th e Novembe r 201 0 Generh J Election. . j l .4ld^ - ^ 

## Mj^'.^%c: > S ^T

T ^.A^^t^ 'i^^i}^^-li^Z . dJ^^AYj , A^aA^.^ - )^^.J^:^^^^-^-^'^'^^^^^j^ - ,,nj^^tKMA^'ii^,),.^^^.^ ^ ^ ^XAJI- U%AA - £hMJt J ^c a•'V^^-y^-k ' /r\^^^^^^r^M^.^ ^ \ ^ ) \J-u y ':^l^- ^ -^^/^^.-rx-^uL^^-ydul^ ^ * • ^.0jl.U? . \ijM^e ^ Uju3-<j.^fl . 

# Tkvv^X.-^ - >^.' ^/^w--^'<^ ^^-^^'^

- .^w.^i^--..j^^^^fc/-4.^^* ^ \U ) .& ^ Let . /f ^ ^...^ WV^i^^-^-^^- t •^^^- jO^^t A^^_^V^-^^- ^
§ 3201.143 Shopping and trash bags. ( a ) *Definition.* Shopping and trash bags are open-ended bags that are typically made of thin, flexible film and are used for containing and transporting items such as consumer goods and waste. Examples include trash bags, can liners, shopping or grocery bags, pet waste bags, compost bags, and yard waste bags. This category does not include product packaging, disposable containers, or semi-durable and non-durable films.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 22 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased shopping and trash bags. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased shopping and trash bags.
( d ) *Determining overlap with a designated product category in the EPA's CPG program.* Qualifying products within this product category may overlap with the EPA's CPG-designated recovered content product category of Non-Paper Office Products: Plastic Trash Bags. USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information on the BioPreferred Program's website about the intended uses of the product, information on whether the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether a qualifying biobased product overlaps with the EPA's CPG-designated product category of Non-Paper Office Products: Trash Bags and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing.
Note 1 to Paragraph ( d
):
Shopping and trash bags within this designated product category can compete with similar shopping and trash bags with recycled content. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CPG-designated Non-Paper Office Products: Trash Bags containing recovered materials as products for which Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.17.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]
Case 3:20-mj-00113-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/12/20 Page 1 of 10
Case 3:20-mj-00113-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/12/20 Page 2 of 10
Case 3:20-mj-00113-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/12/20 Page 3 of 10
Case 3:20-mj-00113-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/12/20 Page 4 of 10
Case 3:20-mj-00113-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/12/20 Page 5 of 10
Case 3:20-mj-00113-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/12/20 Page 6 of 10
Case 3:20-mj-00113-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/12/20 Page 7 of 10
Case 3:20-mj-00113-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/12/20 Page 8 of 10
Case 3:20-mj-00113-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/12/20 Page 9 of 10
Case 3:20-mj-00113-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/12/20 Page 10 of 10
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

FREDERICK JAMES SCHMIDT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5605-MCR-EMT

DR. DELGATO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on 

September 11, 2020. ECF No. 8. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report 

and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of 

all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-05605-MCR-EMT Document 10 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5605-MCR-EMT

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 8,

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious, 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of April 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05605-MCR-EMT Document 10 Filed 04/21/21 Page 2 of 2
§ 3201.20 Fluid-filled transformers. ( a ) *Definition* — ( 1 ) *Synthetic ester-based fluid-filled transformers.* Electric power transformers that are designed to utilize a synthetic ester-based dielectric (non-conducting) fluid to provide insulating and cooling properties.
( 2 ) *Vegetable oil-based fluid-filled transformers.* Electric power transformers that are designed to utilize a vegetable oil-based dielectric (non-conducting) fluid to provide insulating and cooling properties.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The minimum biobased content requirement for all fluid-filled transformers shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product. The applicable minimum biobased contents are: ( 1 ) Synthetic ester-based fluid-filled transformers—66 percent.
( 2 ) Vegetable oil-based fluid-filled transformers—95 percent.
( c ) *Preference compliance date* — ( 1 ) *Synthetic ester-based fluid-filled transformers.* Determination of the compliance date for synthetic ester-based fluid-filled transformers is deferred until USDA identifies two or more manufacturers of synthetic ester-based fluid-filled transformers. At that time, USDA will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing that Federal agencies have one year from the date of publication to give procurement preference to biobased synthetic ester-based fluid-filled transformers.
( 2 ) *Vegetable oil-based fluid-filled transformers.* No later than May 14, 2009, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased vegetable oil-based fluid-filled transformers. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased vegetable oil-based fluid-filled transformers.
[73 FR 27953, May 14, 2008]
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2464 

To amend the Consumer Product Safety Act to remove the exclusion of 

pistols, revolvers, and other firearms from the definition of ‘‘consumer 

product’’ in order to permit the issuance of safety standards for such 

articles by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2013 

Ms. KELLY of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Product Safety Act to remove the 

exclusion of pistols, revolvers, and other firearms from 

the definition of ‘‘consumer product’’ in order to permit 

the issuance of safety standards for such articles by 

the Consumer Product Safety Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINI4 TION OF CONSUMER PRODUCT. 

5 Section 3(a)(5) of the Consumer Product Safety Act 

6 (15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(5)) is amended by striking subparaVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:41 Jun 25, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2464.IH H2464

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2464 IH

1 graph (E) and redesignating subparagraphs (F) through 

2 (I) as subparagraphs (E) through (H), respectively. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 28, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                           1,331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,296
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,559
<PP&E>                                          27,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,403
<BONDS>                                          7,637
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,775
<SALES>                                         62,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,542
<CGS>                                           17,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,722
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,968
<INCOME-TAX>                                       569
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,399
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,399
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
        

</TABLE>
## 

## Complexity, Global Politics, and NationalSecurity

### **Edited by David S. Alberts and ThomasJ. Czerwinski**

### 

National Defense University

Washington, D.C.

----

### Contents

Acknowledgments

Foreword

Preface

Part One. Setting the Scene

Part Two. Complexity Theory and National Security Policy

Part Three. Complexity Theory, Strategy, and Operations

Contributors

Editors

Bibliography

Complexity Index

  

----

Contact   UsNDU   Press Home PageNDU Home PageINSS Home Page

  Last Update:      April 28, 2003