alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Quarterly Report of PDC 2005-B Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Richard W. McCullough

May 14, 2010Richard W. McCulloughChief Executive OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner/s/ Gysle R. Shellum

May 14, 2010Gysle R. ShellumChief Financial OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided by the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of 155 East Tropicana, LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company, and 155East Tropicana Finance Corp., a Nevada corporation, (collectively, the “Company”)for the three months ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Neil G. Kiefer, asPresident and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Neil G. Kiefer                                                        |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Neil G. Kiefer,  President and Chief Executive Officer  November 14, 2005 |

 

 

The foregoingcertifications are being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and arenot being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
#### Irving Polin, and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondent, v Sentry Insurance, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Appeal by defendant Sentry Insurance (1) as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 1, 1979, as denied its motion for a protective order vacating a notice for discovery and inspection on the ground that the motion was untimely, and (2) from a further order of the same court, dated June 14, 1979, which denied its motion for "renewal and/ or reargument” of the June 1, 1979 order. Appeal from the order dated June 14, 1979 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. We have reviewed the motion papers and find that the motion was actually one for reargument. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument *(Mundy v Nassau County Civ. Serv. Comm.,*56 AD2d 885). Order dated June 1, 1979 reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, the provision denying Sentry’s motion for a protective order as untimely is deleted therefrom, and the matter is remitted to Special Term for a determination of the motion on the merits. It is conceded that the notice for discovery and inspection was placed in the mail by the plaintiff on March 13, 1979, and was received by the appellant three days later, on March 16. On March 20, 1979 the appellant served its motion for protective order. CPLR 2103 (subd [b], par 2) provides, *inter alia,*that "where a period of time prescribed by law is measured from the service of a paper and service is by mail, three days shall be added to the prescribed period”. Adding three days to the five days prescribed by CPLR 3122 for the service of a motion for a protective order (as it then read), yields a total of eight days within which to so move, and since the instant motion was made on the *seventh*day following the service of plaintiffs notice for discovery and inspection, it was timely when made. Accordingly, it was entitled to be considered on the merits. We note in passing that CPLR 3122 has since been amended to enlarge the time within which to move for a protective order to 10 days (L 1979, ch 80, eff Sept. 1, 1979) and that the foregoing, when coupled with the other circumstances of this case, would have prompted us to exercise our discretion to excuse appellant’s lack of compliance with the five-day period prescribed by CPLR 3122 even had the application proved untimely (see *Matter of Handel v Handel,*26 NY2d 853). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Gibbons, Rabin and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000795662
<NAME> STERLING CHEMICALS HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,958
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169,077
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,829
<INVENTORY>                                     87,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               284,037
<PP&E>                                         742,426
<DEPRECIATION>                                 250,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 878,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          163,933
<BONDS>                                        876,281
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           15,793
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                   (288,648)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   878,971
<SALES>                                        908,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               908,787
<CGS>                                          813,148
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  813,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              88,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,432)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,296)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,136)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,924)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,060)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.58)
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BRIAN MARKEITH GAGE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:19cv3650-MCR-HTC

WALTER CLEMMONS,

CAPTAIN JOHN DOE,

TIMOTHY STEPHENS,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation dated September 4, 2020, ECF No. 39, which recommends that 

the Defendant Clemmons’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 30, be granted. The parties 

have been given an opportunity to file objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any duly filed 

objections, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Case 3:19-cv-03650-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 10/09/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:19cv3650-MCR-HTC

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

(1)The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 39, is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

(2) Defendant Clemmons’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 30, is GRANTED, 

and the First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 9, is DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE as to Defendant Clemmons.

(3)The Clerk is directed to refer the matter back to the magistrate judge for 

further proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of October 2020.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:19-cv-03650-MCR-HTC Document 40 Filed 10/09/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 3555.52 Lender approval. ( a ) *Initial approval.* The lender must apply for and receive approval from Rural Development to participate in the SFHGLP. Application forms are available from Rural Development.
( b ) *Conditions of approval.* The lender must provide evidence to support their ability to originate, underwrite and/or service SFHGLP loans as outlined in § 3555.51(a), including evidence of the lender's internal loan criteria and quality control. New lenders will be subject to mandatory training prior to lender approval in accordance with Agency procedures.
( c ) *Termination of approval.* Lender approval may be terminated in any of the following situations: ( 1 ) *Lapse of any eligibility requirement.* In the event that a lender fails to meet any of the requirements described in § 3555.51, the lender must notify Rural Development immediately. Rural Development may terminate the lender's approval upon written notice and in accordance with the lender's agreement. The Agency may take other appropriate corrective action due to non-compliance with any of the requirements in this part and the lender's agreement. A lender whose approval has been terminated must sell any SFHGLP loans it holds to an approved lender immediately, and in no event later than 6 months, after termination of approval.
( 2 ) *Voluntary withdrawal.* The lender may choose to end participation in the SFHGLP at any time. If the withdrawing lender has originated SFHGLP loans and obtained conditional commitments but has not closed the loans, or is holding or servicing SFHGLP loans, the lender must make arrangements prior to withdrawing for the transfer of such loans to lenders approved to participate in the SFHGLP.
In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

February 15, 2006.

Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 2275) entitled ‘‘An Act to temporarily increase the borrowing authority 

of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for carrying 

out the national flood insurance program’’, do pass with the 

following

AMENDMENT:

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Flood Insur3 ance Program Enhanced Borrowing Authority Act of 

4 2006’’. 

5 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN BORROWING AUTHORITY. 

6 The first sentence of subsection (a) of section 1309 of 

7 the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 

8 4016(a)), as amended by the National Flood Insurance Pro9 gram Further Enhanced Borrowing Authority Act of 2005 

10 (Public Law 109–106; 119 Stat. 2288), is amended by strik11 ing ‘‘$18,500,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,775,000,000’’. 
2

•S 2275 EAH 

1 SEC. 3. EMERGENCY SPENDING. 

2 Amendments made pursuant to this Act are designated 

3 as emergency spending, as provided under section 402 of 

4 H. Con. Res. 95 (109th Congress).

Attest:

Clerk. 
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2275

AMENDMENT
7.204 Responsibilities of contracting officers.

(a) Contracting officers are responsible for transmitting offeror responses to the solicitation

provision at 52.207-4 to appropriate inventory management/requirements development activities in

accordance with agency procedures. The economic purchase quantity data so obtained are intended

to assist inventory managers in establishing and evaluating economic order quantities for supplies

under their cognizance.

(b) In recognition of the fact that economic purchase quantity data furnished by offerors are only

one of many data inputs required for determining the most economical order quantities, contracting

officers should generally take no action to revise quantities to be acquired in connection with the

instant procurement. However, if a significant price variation is evident from offeror responses, and

the potential for significant savings is apparent, the contracting officer shall consult with the

cognizant inventory manager or requirements development activity before proceeding with an award

or negotiations. If this consultation discloses that the Government should be ordering an item of

supply in different quantities and the inventory manager/requirements development activity concurs,

the solicitation for the item should be amended or canceled and a new requisition should be

obtained.

Parent topic: Subpart 7.2 - Planning for the Purchase of Supplies in Economic Quantities
# LI2021129EN.01000101.xml

| 15.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | LI 129/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

LI 129/1

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/612

of 15 April 2021

implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 imposing additional restrictive measures directed against ISIL (Da’esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 of 20 September 2016 imposing additional restrictive measures directed against ISIL (Da’esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 20 September 2016 the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/1686. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 20 September 2016 the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/1686.

| (2) | In view of the continued threat posed by ISIL (Da’esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them, one person should be added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In view of the continued threat posed by ISIL (Da’esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them, one person should be added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686.

| (3) | Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 April 2021.

For the Council

The President

A. P. ZACARIAS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 255, 21.9.2016, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

The following entry is added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686:

| ‘7. | Mesut SEKERCI; date of birth: 22 July 1995; place of birth: Evreux (France); nationality: French, Turkish.’. |
| --- | --- |

‘7.

---
#### § 29.6081 Elements of quality and degrees of each element.

These standardized words or terms are used to describe tobacco quality and to assist in interpreting grade specifications. Tobacco attributes or characteristics which constitute quality are designated as elements of quality. The range within each element is expressed by the use of words or terms designated as degrees. These degrees are arranged to show their relative value, but the actual value of each degree varies with type and group.

| Elements | Degrees | | |
| Body | Heavy | Medium | Thin. |
| Maturity | Immature | Mature | Ripe. |
| Leaf structure | Close | Firm | Open. |
| Elasticity | Inelastic | Semielastic | Elastic. |
| Strength (tensile) | Weak | Normal | Strong. |
| Width | Narrow | ......do | Spready. |
| Length | (1) | (1) | (1) |
| Uniformity | (2) | (2) | (2) |
| Injury tolerance | (2) | (2) | (2) |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Expressed in inches. | | | |
| 2 Expressed in percentages. | | | |
## Forest Roads Discussion EP A 

### & NAFO 3/24/16 WJC East , Room 4349
# 3.503-2 Contract clause.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.203-6, Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government, in *solicitations* and contracts exceeding the *simplified acquisition threshold*. For the *acquisition* of *commercial products* or *commercial services*, the *contracting officer**shall* use the clause with its *Alternate* I.

**Parent topic:**3.503 Unreasonable restrictions on subcontractor sales.
#### § 3570.284 Review or appeal rights.

A person may seek a review of an Agency decision under this subpart from the appropriate Agency official that oversees the program in question or appeal to the USDA National Appeals Division in accordance with 7 CFR part 11.
98-1532.

#### State ex rel. Farley v. McIntosh.

Montgomery App. No. 16682. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
#### § 402.1 General statement.

The Federal Crop Insurance Act, as amended by the Federal Crop Insurance Reform Act of 1994, requires the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation to implement a catastrophic risk protection plan of insurance that provides a basic level of insurance coverage to protect producers in the event of a catastrophic crop loss due to loss of yield or prevented planting, if provided by the Corporation, provided the crop loss or prevented planting is due to an insured cause of loss specified in the crop insurance policy. This Catastrophic Risk Protection Endorsement is a continuous endorsement that is effective in conjunction with a crop insurance policy for the insured crop. Catastrophic risk protection coverage will be offered through approved insurance providers if there are a sufficient number available to service the area. If there are an insufficient number available, as determined by the Secretary, local offices of the Farm Service Agency will provide catastrophic risk protection coverage.
# L_2021108EN.01005901.xml

| 29.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 108/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 108/59

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2021/543

of 26 March 2021

amending Decision 2011/173/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/173/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/173/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

| (2) | On the basis of a review of Decision 2011/173/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 31 March 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review of Decision 2011/173/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 31 March 2022.

| (3) | Decision 2011/173/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2011/173/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The second paragraph of Article 6 of Decision 2011/173/CFSP is replaced by the following:

‘This Decision shall apply until 31 March 2022.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 26 March 2021.

For the Council

The President

A. P. ZACARIAS

---

(1)  Council Decision 2011/173/CFSP of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina (OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 68).

1

---
#### § 3555.53 Contracting for loan origination.

Lenders may contract with mortgage brokers, non-approved lenders, or other entities for loan origination services, closing services, or both, provided the loan is transferred immediately after closing to an Agency approved lender to which the guarantee will be issued. The approved lender is responsible for ensuring that the loan is properly underwritten, obtaining the conditional commitment, ensuring that the loan is properly closed, and ensuring that all closing costs, financing, and settlement fees meet Agency program requirements.
#### In re DONOHUE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 12, 1906.)

In the matter of Robert D. Donohue.

No opinion. Application denied.
§ 360.301 Information required for applications for permits to move noxious weeds. ( a ) *Permit to import a noxious weed into the United States.* A responsible person must apply for a permit to import a noxious weed into the United States.[2] The application must include the following information: ( 1 ) The responsible person's name, address, telephone number, and (if available) e-mail address;
( 2 ) The taxon of the noxious weed;
( 3 ) Plant parts to be moved;
( 4 ) Quantity of noxious weeds to be moved per shipment;
( 5 ) Proposed number of shipments per year;
( 6 ) Origin of the noxious weeds;
( 7 ) Destination of the noxious weeds;
( 8 ) Whether the noxious weed is established in the State of destination;
( 9 ) Proposed method of shipment;
( 10 ) Proposed port of first arrival in the United States;
( 11 ) Approximate date of arrival;
( 12 ) Intended use of the noxious weeds;
( 13 ) Measures to be employed to prevent danger of noxious weed dissemination; and
( 14 ) Proposed method of final disposition of the noxious weeds.
( b ) *Permit to move noxious weeds interstate.* A responsible person must apply for a permit to move a noxious weed interstate.[3] The application must include the following information: ( 1 ) The responsible person's name, address, telephone number, and (if available) e-mail address;
( 2 ) The taxon of the noxious weed;
( 3 ) Plant parts to be moved;
( 4 ) Quantity of noxious weeds to be moved per shipment;
( 5 ) Proposed number of shipments per year,
( 6 ) Origin of the noxious weeds;
( 7 ) Destination of the noxious weeds;
( 8 ) Whether the noxious weed is established in the State of destination;
( 9 ) Proposed method of shipment,
( 10 ) Approximate date of movement;
( 11 ) Intended use of the noxious weeds;
( 12 ) Measures to be employed to prevent danger of noxious weed dissemination; and
( 13 ) Proposed method of final disposition of the noxious weeds.
( c ) *Permits to move noxious weeds through the United States.* Permits to move noxious weeds through the United States must be obtained in accordance with part 352 of this chapter.
[75 FR 68954, Nov. 10, 2010] Footnotes -
360.301
[2] Information on applying for a permit to import a noxious weed into the United States is available at *http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/permits/plantproducts.shtml .*
[3] Information on applying for a permit to move a noxious weed interstate is available at *http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/permits/plantproducts.shtml .*