alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form of Amendment to Change of Control Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC. 
 AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to the Change of Control Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made effective as of the last date signed below, by and between Sun
Microsystems, Inc. (the “Company”), and [                            ] (the
“Executive”). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into that certain Change of Control Agreement dated January 1, 2009 (the “Agreement”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement to amend the definition of Change of Control. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Executive agree that in consideration of the foregoing and the promises and covenants contained herein, the
parties agree as follows: 
 AGREEMENT 
 1. Definition of Change of Control. Section 2(d)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 (i) The closing of a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior
thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or its parent company) more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power represented by the voting
securities of the Company or such surviving entity, or its parent company, outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company, or the closing of the
sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets. 
 2. Full Force and Effect. To the
extent not expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 3. Entire Agreement. This Amendment and
the Agreement constitute the full and entire understanding and agreement between the parties with regard to the subjects hereof and thereof. 
 4. Successors and Assigns. This Amendment and the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, their respective successors, assigns, and legal representatives. 







 5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall
constitute one instrument, and each of which may be executed by less than all of the parties to this Amendment. 
 6. Governing Law.
This Amendment shall be governed in all respects by the internal laws of California, without regard to principles of conflicts of law. 
 7.
Amendment. Any provision of this Amendment may be amended, waived or terminated by a written instrument signed by the Company and Executive. 
 (Signature page follows) 
  

					
	[                            ]	  		  	SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
			
	  
	  		  	  

	Signature	  		  	Signature
			
		  		  	  

		  		  	Print Name
			
		  		  	  

		  		  	Print Title
			
	Date: ________________________, 2009	  		  	Date:________________________, 2009

 (Signature page to Amendment to Change of Control Agreement)
#### §§ 4280.126-4280.136 [Reserved]
#### §§ 4280.307-4280.309 [Reserved]
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 3, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Richard A. RappaportRichard
                A. RappaportPrincipal
                Executive OfficerMay
                6, 2008
98-1413.

#### State v. Corner.

Shelby App. No. 17-97-13. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Moyer, C. J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent.
§ 3555.8 Conflict of interest. ( a ) *Applicant or borrower responsibility.* The applicant or borrower must disclose to the lender any prohibited relationship or association with any Rural Development employee, and the lender must disclose that information to Rural Development.
( b ) *Lender responsibility.* The lender must disclose to Rural Development any prohibited relationship or association it, or any of its employees, has with any Rural Development employee.
( c ) *Prohibited relationships and associations.* Prohibited relationships and associations include the following: ( 1 ) Immediate family members, including parents and children, whether related by blood or marriage;
( 2 ) Close relatives, including grandmother, grandfather, aunt, uncle, sister, brother, niece, nephew, granddaughter, grandson, or first cousin, whether related by blood or marriage;
( 3 ) Any household residents;
( 4 ) Immediate working relationships, including coworkers in the same office, subordinates, and immediate supervisors; and
( 5 ) Close business associations, including business partnerships, joint ventures, or closely held corporations.
( d ) *Result of disclosure.* Disclosure of prohibited relationships and associations under this section will not necessarily result in applicant, borrower or lender ineligibility. Disclosures may result in reassignment with regard to the loan guarantee in question so that no prohibited relationships or associations exist between the Rural Development employees responsible for loan guarantee transactions and lenders, borrowers, or applicants.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
TERRATECH INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 29,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                          63,172
<SECURITIES>                                    31,362
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,838
<INVENTORY>                                      3,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               187,038
<PP&E>                                         132,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 393,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,723
<BONDS>                                        165,186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,830
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   393,784
<SALES>                                         27,119
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               278,503
<CGS>                                           22,677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  230,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,846
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   625
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,914
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (291)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,705
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (162)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (162)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
(January 11, 1967)

#### In the Matter of Proceedings Against Suffolk County District Court Judge Floyd Sarisohn, Respondent.

Motion by respondent to have this court disqualify itself in this proceeding against him denied. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ and Rabin, JJ., concur; Munder, J., not voting.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 30, 2016

NO. 03-15-00341-CV

Antioch St. Johns Cemetery Company d/b/a American Memorial Park, Grand Prairie, 

Texas; Gerald Weatherall; and Beverly Randall-Weatherall, Appellants

v.

Texas Department of Banking Commissioner, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on April 30, 2015. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0259 SNPRM

Directorate ID: 2010-NM-196-AD

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO, we don’t agree because 
Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PICTURETEL
CORPORATION'S BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 28,
1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          33,638
<SECURITIES>                                    52,545
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,910
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,956)
<INVENTORY>                                     36,651
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               244,135
<PP&E>                                         147,228
<DEPRECIATION>                                  88,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 336,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,618
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           383
<OTHER-SE>                                     221,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   336,808
<SALES>                                        205,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,628
<CGS>                                          119,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,021)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,167)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,854)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,854)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29830]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE:  Wednesday, December 1, 2010; 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE:  Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS:  Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered:

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: November 19, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29830 Filed 11-22-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
#### § 35.8 Date of export.

*Date of export* means the date of loading on board the exporting carrier on which movement of the grapes from the United States is effected. The date of the on board bill of lading (or loading tally sheet) shall be considered to be the date the grapes were loaded on board, unless an “on board” date is shown.
Exhibit 10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 2009 Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers 
 On March 3, 2009, the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors of General Dynamics Corporation (the company) approved the 2009 base salaries and 2008 bonus payments for the company’s named executive officers. The named executive officers listed in the table below reflect those
individuals identified in the company’s 2009 Annual Proxy Statement, as well as Jay L. Johnson, Vice Chairman of the company, who will become chief executive officer following Nicholas D. Chabraja’s retirement on June 30, 2009.

 The table below lists the 2009 annual base salary levels effective March 23, 2009. 
  

					
	 Name and Principal Position
	  	2009 Base Salary	 
		
	 Nicholas D. Chabraja
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	1,400,000	 
		
	 L. Hugh Redd
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	745,000	 
		
	 Gerard J. DeMuro
Executive Vice President, Information Systems and Technology
	  	$	655,000	 
		
	 Charles M. Hall
Executive Vice President, Combat Systems
	  	$	645,000	 
		
	 David A. Savner
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
	  	$	625,000	 
		
	 Jay L. Johnson
Vice Chairman
	  	$	860,000	(1)

  

	(1)	Mr. Johnson’s base salary will increase to $1,400,000 when he becomes chief executive officer on July 1, 2009. 

 Effective March 3, 2009, the Compensation Committee also approved the 2008 bonus payments for the named executive officers which were previously disclosed in the
company’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission March 10, 2009.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-2358

___________ David M. Deloria, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Ed Lightenberg, Director of P.N.P., * SDSP Bd of P.N.P.; Douglas Weber, * [UNPUBLISHED] Warden SDSP; South Dakota Board * of Pardons and Paroles; Kay Nikolas, * Bd. Member; Patricia Meyers, Bd. * Member; Mr. Alders, Bd. Member; * James Smith, Bd. Member; Dave * Nelson, Bd. Member, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 1, 2010 Filed: November 4, 2010

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, Un ited States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable John E. Simko, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota. -2- South Dakota inmate David Deloria appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 comp laint asserting that he was improperly denied parole and good time credits, in violation of his due process rights.
Upon careful de novo review, seeMoore v. Sims , 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (dismissal under 28 U.S .C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)); Cooper v. Schriro , 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per cu riam) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A), we conclude that Deloria failed to state a claim. See Wilkinson v. Dotson , 544 U.S. 74, 81-82 (2005) (state prisoners may use only habeas remedies when they seek to invalidate duration of confinement, eith er directly through injunction compelling speedier release or indirectly through judici al determination that necessarily implies unlawfulness of state’s custody); Figg v. Russell , 433 F.3d 593, 597-600 (8th Cir. 2006) (parole board members are absolutely immune from suit when considering and denying parole questions; extending absolute immunity to parole agent where his function was so associated with function of parole board that hewas also cloaked in immunity); cf. Zar v. S.D. Bd. of Exam’rs of Psychologists , 976 F.2d 459, 464 (8th Cir. 1992) (board of examiners itself was not “person” within meaning of § 1983). We also agree with the district court that , to the extent Deloria asserted an equal protection claim related to his ineligibility for good time credits, he failed to state a claim. Cf. Bergee v. S.D. Bd. of Pardons & Paroles , 608 N.W.2d 636, 644 (S.D. 2000) (inmates’ equal protection rights not vi olated where prisoners sentenced prior to effective date of new parole statute are required to serve out sentences under old statute).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 27, 2009 

d0518 

Order 

 

May 27, 2009 

137872 & (26) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137872 

 COA: 286385 

Muskegon CC: 96-139452-FC 

JIMMY EARL RONE, SR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

miscellaneous relief is DENIED.
Inthe Matter of 

# United States ofAmerica DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

# RECEIVED DEC 3 12012 

## HEARING DOCKET

SouthwestAirlines Co. ) 

### ) ) ) ) FAA Case No. 2010SW290037 DocketNo. 2013-A WA-CPP-16372 FDMS No. FAA 2012-1259



### WITHDRAWAL OFREQUEST FORHEARING COMES NOW Respondent Southwest Airlines Co., through counsel, and pursuant to 14 CFR Section 13.215 hereby withdraws its Request for Hearing inFAA Case No. 2010SW290037.
Dated: December 28,2012 Respectfully submitted,

Dane B. Jaques, Esq. DombroffGihnore Jaques & French, PC 1676 International Drive, Penthouse McLean, VA 22102 (703) 336-8800 djaques@dglitigators.com Counsel for Respondent SouthwestAirlines Co.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this day served the original and one copy of the foregoing WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST FOR HEARING on the following, at the address indicated, viaUPS overnight delivery: Hearing Docket Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue, SW Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 And have served a copy on the following, at the address indicated, via email and UPS overnight delivery:

Signed:

Dated: Yolanda Ayala Bernal, Esq. FederalAviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel Southwest Region 2601 MeachamBlvd., Room 663 FortWorth, TX 76137 Yolanda.A.Bernal@faa.gov

Dane B. Jaques Counsel for Respondent
December 28, 2012

2
#### §§ 3555.210-3555.249 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 29 (Friday, February 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3001]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 9 a.m. (Eastern Time) February 16, 2010.

Place: 4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20005.

Status: Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the 
public.

Matters to be Considered: 

Parts Open to the Public

1. Approval of the minutes of the January 19, 2010 Board member 
meeting.
2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.
    a. Monthly Participant Activity Report.
    b. Monthly Investment Performance Report.
    c. Legislative Report.
3. Vendor Financial Update.
4. Report on Participant Behavior in the Financial Crisis.
5. Thrift Savings Plan Enhancement Act Implementation Update.
6. DOL Audit Briefing.

Parts Closed to the Public

7. Proprietary Data.
8. Personnel.

Contact Person for More Information: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: February 9, 2010.
Thomas K. Emswiler,
Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-3001 Filed 2-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
9.703 Contracting with individual pool members.       (a)                    						            Pool members may submit individual offers, independent of the pool. However, the contracting officer shall not consider an independent offer by a pool member if that pool member participates in a competing offer submitted by the pool.                                          (b)                    						            If a pool member submits an individual offer, independent of the pool, the contracting officer shall consider the pool agreement, along with other factors, in determining whether that pool member is a responsible prospective contractor under subpart  9.1.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 9.7 - Defense Production Pools and Research and Development Pools