Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices 73041 

1See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty 

Investigation, 75 FR 22109 (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

Vietnam. See Certain Tissue Paper 

Products from the People’s Republic of 

China: Initiation of Anti-circumvention 

Inquiry, 75 FR 17127 (April 5, 2010) 

(Initiation). In the Initiation notice, the 

Department stated that it would focus 

its analysis on the significance of the 

production process in Vietnam by Max 

Fortune Vietnam, the company the 

petitioner identified in its 

circumvention request (which is the 

same company on which the 

Department initiated an administrative 

review). In its June 28, 2010, response 

to the Department’s April 23, 2010, 

questionnaire in the anticircumvention 

inquiry, Max Fortune Vietnam claimed 

that it did not export tissue paper to the 

United States produced from jumbo 

rolls imported from the PRC since 

January 2008. Likewise, in its August 

17, 2010, response to the Department’s 

May 7, 2010, questionnaire, in this 

review, Max Fortune Vietnam claimed 

that it did not export subject 

merchandise from the PRC or Vietnam. 

Rescission, in Part, of Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if the party 

who requested the review withdraws 

the request within 90 days of the date 

of publication of the notice of initiation 

of the requested review. Accordingly, 

the petitioner timely withdrew its 

request for review of Max Fortune 

Industrial and Max Fortune Fuzhou. In 

addition, Huaguang Special Craft 

withdrew its own request for review 

within the 90-day period. Because no 

other party requested a review of these 

companies’ entries, we are rescinding 

this administrative review with respect 

to these companies in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). 

Extension of Time Limits for 

Preliminary Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to issue the preliminary 

results of an administrative review 

within 245 days after the last day of the 

anniversary month of the date of 

publication of an order for which a 

review is requested. If it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within this time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend this deadline to a 

maximum of 365 days. 

As noted above, Max Fortune Vietnam 

claimed that it made no shipments from 

Vietnam of tissue paper made from PRCorigin jumbo rolls or sheets to the U.S. 

market during the POR. Data on the 

record does indicate, however, that Max 

Fortune Vietnam has exported tissue 

paper from Vietnam to the U.S. market 

during the period overlapping the 

administrative review POR. In response 

to the Department’s questionnaire in the 

anticircumvention inquiry, Max Fortune 

Vietnam claimed that it has not 

exported to the United States tissue 

paper produced from jumbo rolls 

imported from the PRC since January 

2008. Depending on the Department’s 

finding in the anticircumvention 

segment, Max Fortune Vietnam may or 

may not continue to be a respondent in 

the administrative review. Because the 

Department intends to conduct 

verification of Max Fortune Vietnam’s 

claims in the circumvention segment, 

the results of that verification will 

directly impact the administrative 

review segment of this proceeding. The 

Department, therefore, requires 

additional time in this review to make 

a preliminary finding on Max Fortune 

Vietnam’s ‘‘no shipment’’ claim. For this 

reason, it is not practicable to complete 

this review within the original time 

limit. Thus, the Department is fully 

extending the time limit for completion 

of the preliminary results by 120 days 

to 365 days, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. The preliminary 

results are now due no later than March 

31, 2011. The final results continue to 

be due 120 days after publication of the 

preliminary results. 

Assessment 

For the companies for which the 

Department is rescinding this review, 

the Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. Therefore, for Max 

Fortune Industrial, Max Fortune 

Fuzhou, and Huaguang Special Craft, 

antidumping duties shall be assessed, if 

applicable, at rates equal to the cash 

deposit of estimated antidumping duties 

required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after publication of this notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4) and 351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: November 19, 2010. 

Susan H. Kuhbach, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29969 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–967] 

Aluminum Extrusions From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Postponement of Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: November 29, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Stolz or Lori Apodaca, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4474 

and (202) 482–4551, respectively. 

Postponement of Final Determination 

The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) initiated the 

antidumping duty investigation of 

aluminum extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) on April 27, 

2010.1 On November 12, 2010, the 

Department published the Preliminary 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

73042 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices 

2See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Notice of Preliminary 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 

and Preliminary Determination of Targeted 

Dumping, 75 FR 69403 (November 12, 2010) 

(‘‘Preliminary Determination’’). 

3See Aluminum Extrusions from the PRC: 

Request by Guang Ya Group for an Extension of the 

Final Determination (November 1, 2010). See also 

Preliminary Determination, finding that Guang Ya 

Group, Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., 

Ltd., Zhongya Shaped Aluminium (HK) Holding 

Limited and Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd., and 

Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd. 

should be considered a single entity for purposes 

of this investigation. 

4March 27, 2011, is 135 days after the date of the 

publication of the preliminary determination. 

However, because March 27, 2011, is a Sunday, we 

will postpone the due date to the next business day, 

Monday, March 28, 2011. 1C2H8O7P2 or C(CH3)(OH)(PO3H2)2. 

Determination in the Federal Register.2

The final determination of this 

antidumping duty investigation is 

currently due on January 10, 2011. 

Section 735(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’) provides that a final 

determination may be postponed until 

not later than 135 days after the date of 

the publication of the preliminary 

determination if, in the event of an 

affirmative determination, a request for 

such postponement is made by 

exporters who account for a significant 

proportion of exports of the subject 

merchandise, or in the event of a 

negative preliminary determination, a 

request for such postponement is made 

by petitioner. In addition, 19 CFR 

351.210(e)(2) requires that requests by 

respondents for postponement of a final 

determination be accompanied by a 

request for extension of provisional 

measures from a four-month period to 

not more than six months. 

On November 1, 2010, Guang Ya 

Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd., Foshan 

Guangcheng Aluminium Co., Ltd., Kong 

Ah International Company Limited, and 

Guang Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong 

Kong) Limited, (collectively, ‘‘Guang Ya 

Group’’), one of the entities comprising 

the sole active mandatory respondent in 

this investigation, requested an 

extension of the final determination and 

extension of the provisional measures.3

Thus, because the Preliminary 

Determination is affirmative, the 

respondent requesting extension of the 

final determination and extension of the 

provisional measures accounts for 

significant proportion of exports of the 

subject merchandise, and no compelling 

reasons for denial exist, we are 

extending the due date for the final 

determination in this investigation to no 

later than 135 days after the date of the 

publication of the preliminary 

determination. 

For the reasons identified above, we 

are postponing the final determination 

until March 28, 2011.4

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to sections 777(i) and 735(a)(2) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(g). 

Dated: November 15, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29874 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–847] 

1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 

1-Diphosphonic Acid From India: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a timely 

request by one manufacturer/exporter, 

Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt., Ltd. 

(Aquapharm), the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) is 

conducting an administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on 1- 

hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-diphosphonic 

acid (HEDP) from India with respect to 

Aquapharm. The review covers the 

period April 23, 2009, through March 

31, 2010. We preliminarily determine 

that Aquapharm did not make sales 

below normal value (NV). 

If the preliminary results are adopted 

in our final results of the administrative 

review, we will issue appropriate 

assessment instructions to U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Goldberger or Brandon Custard, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–4136 or (202) 482– 

1823, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In response to a timely request by 

Aquapharm, on May 28, 2010, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on HEDP from 

India with respect to Aquapharm 

covering the period April 23, 2009, 

through March 31, 2010. See Initiation 

of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Reviews, 75 FR 

29976 (May 28, 2010). 

On June 11, 2010, we issued the 

antidumping duty questionnaire to 

Aquapharm. On July 19, 2010, we 

received a response to section A (i.e., 

the section covering general information 

about the company), and on August 10, 

2010, we received responses to sections 

B (i.e., the section covering comparisonmarket sales) and C (i.e., the section 

covering U.S. sales) of the antidumping 

duty questionnaire from Aquapharm. 

On September 15, 2010, we issued to 

Aquapharm a supplemental 

questionnaire regarding its responses to 

sections A, B, and C of the original 

questionnaire, and received a response 

to this supplemental questionnaire on 

September 29, 2010. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order includes all grades of aqueous, 

acidic (non-neutralized) concentrations 

of 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1- 

diphosphonic acid,1 also referred to as 

hydroxethlylidenediphosphonic acid, 

hydroxyethanediphosphonic acid, 

acetodiphosphonic acid, and etidronic 

acid. The CAS (Chemical Abstract 

Service) registry number for HEDP is 

2809–21–4. The merchandise subject to 

this order is currently classified in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) at subheading 

2931.00.9043. It may also enter under 

HTSUS subheading 2811.19.6090. 

While HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes 

only, the written description of the 

scope of this order is dispositive. 

Period of Review 

The period of review (POR) is April 

23, 2009, through March 31, 2010. 

Comparisons to Normal Value 

To determine whether Aquapharm’s 

sales of HEDP from India to the United 

States were made at less than NV, we 

compared the export price (EP) or 

constructed export price (CEP) to NV, as 

described in the ‘‘Export Price and 

Constructed Export Price’’ and ‘‘Normal 

Value’’ sections of this notice. 

Pursuant to section 777A(d)(2) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

we compared the EPs and CEPs of 

individual U.S. transactions to the 

weighted-average NV of the foreign like 

product where there were sales made in 

the ordinary course of trade. See 

discussion below. 

Product Comparisons 

In accordance with section 771(16) of 

the Act, we considered all products 

produced by Aquapharm covered by the 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES