alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
law offices 

LACHT R 

stephen lachter +associates pile 

Brett Kruger, Acting Chief 

US Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

September 22, 2014 

AT 

Re: Frontier Airlines US-Mexico Exemption Authority 

(Docket DOT -OST -2013-0144) 

Dear Mr. Kruger: 

On August 16, 2013 the Department granted Frontier Airlines, Inc. ("Frontier") 

exemption authority to provide scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property 

and mail between three city-pairs 1. Lansing, Michigan- Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (LANPVR); 2. Lansing, Michigan - Cancun, Mexico (LAN-CUN); and 3. St. Louis, Missouri -

San Jose del Cabo, Mexico (STL-SJD). 

These services were intended to be operated on a seasonal basis only and, consistent 

with the exemption, Frontier operated in all three markets this past winter. 

While Frontier plans, once again, to provide seasonal service next year on the 

STL-SJD route, the carrier has determined not to institute service in either Lansing 

market. Therefore, consistent with the Department's policy, this is to notify you that 

Frontier intends to discontinue seasonal service in both markets. 

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

s 

A ER & ASSOCIATES, PLLC 

COUNSEL FOR FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC. 

stephen.lachter@lachterlaw.coin 

slcpllen lacllter & associates pile- 1150 coniH.:cticul avenue. suite 900- washington, de 20036- telephone: 202J!62.43:2 1 - 1~1';: 202.ll35.3219
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS (SEE ANNUAL REPORT PAGE 33) AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (SEE
ANNUAL REPORT PAGE 32). THIS INFORMATION IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000796370
<NAME>                        United Asset Management Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         123,754
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169,566
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               304,941
<PP&E>                                         100,388
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (62,997)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,321,691<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          222,550
<BONDS>                                        882,138<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       703
<OTHER-SE>                                     184,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,321,691
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               882,306
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  600,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               105,488<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             69,162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                107,154
<INCOME-TAX>                                   45,867
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            61,287
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   61,287
<EPS-BASIC>                                    1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.03

<FN>
<F1>
Includes $841,454 of cost assigned to contracts acquired, net.
<F2>
Includes $700,401 in senior notes payable and $181,737 in subordinated notes
payable.
<F3>
Represents amortization of cost assigned to contracts acquired.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Anto nio, Texas

August 29, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00497

- CV

IN RE Paty MCDERMOTT

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

Beth Watkins , Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

On August 8, 2022

, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus

. This court believes a

serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8( b). R espondent and real part y in interest may file a response to the petition in this

court no later than September 13, 2022

. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 52.4.

It is so ORDERED on August 29, 2022

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________

Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021CI09758 , styled James William McDermott v. Paty McDermott

, pending in the 166th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Martha Tanner presiding.
§ 400.352 State and local laws and regulations preempted. ( a ) No State or local governmental body or non-governmental body shall have the authority to promulgate rules or regulations, pass laws, or issue policies or decisions that directly or indirectly affect or govern agreements, contracts, or actions authorized by this part unless such authority is specifically authorized by this part or by the Corporation.
( b ) The following is a non-inclusive list of examples of actions that State or local governmental entities or non-governmental entities are specifically prohibited from taking against the Corporation or any party that is acting pursuant to this part. Such entities may not: ( 1 ) Impose or enforce liens, garnishments, or other similar actions against proceeds obtained, or payments issued in accordance with the Federal Crop Insurance Act, these regulations, or contracts or agreements entered into pursuant to these regulations;
( 2 ) Tax premiums associated with policies issued hereunder;
( 3 ) Exercise approval authority over policies issued;
( 4 ) Levy fines, judgments, punitive damages, compensatory damages, or judgments for attorney fees or other costs against companies, employees of companies including agents and loss adjustors, or Federal employees arising out of actions or inactions on the part of such individuals and entities authorized or required under the Federal Crop Insurance Act, the regulations, any contract or agreement authorized by the Federal Crop Insurance Act or by regulations, or procedures issued by the Corporation (Nothing herein precludes such damages being imposed against the company if a determination is obtained from FCIC that the company, its employee, agent or loss adjuster failed to comply with the terms of the policy or procedures issued by FCIC and such failure resulted in the insured receiving a payment in an amount that is less than the amount to which the insured was entitled); or
( 5 ) Assess any tax, fee, or amount for the funding or maintenance of any State or local insolvency pool or other similar fund.
The preceding list does not limit the scope or meaning of paragraph (a) of this section. [55 FR 23069, June 6, 1990, as amended at 69 FR 48730, Aug. 10, 2004]
EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors 
Trans World Entertainment Corporation:

We consent to
incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-14572,
33-40399, 33-51094, 33-51516, 33-59319, 333-75231, 333-81685, 333-101532, and
333-128210) on Form S-8 pertaining to the Trans World Music Corp. 1986
Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the Trans World Music Corp. 1990
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, the Trans World Entertainment
Corp. 1994 Stock Option Plan, the Camelot Music Holdings, Inc. 1998 Stock
Option Plan, the Camelot Music Holdings, Inc. Outside Directors Stock Option
Plan, the Trans World Entertainment Corp. 1998 Stock Option Plan, the Trans
World Entertainment Corp. 1999 Stock Option Plan, the Trans World Entertainment
Corporation 2002 Stock Option Plan, and the Trans World Entertainment
Corporation 2005 Long Term Incentive and Share Award Plan of our reports dated
April 15, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Trans World
Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries as of January 30, 2010, and January
31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in
the three-year period ended January 30, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2010 which reports appear in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries
for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Albany, New York
April 15, 2010

---
#### TAW Respondent, v. MICHELSON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Action by Joseph Taw against Michael Michelson.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 6, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41385

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT DWAYNE WALKER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-22-ALL

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Dwayne Walker appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to

distribute five or more grams of cocaine base in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Walker argues that the district court erred

in increasing his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) and

that the enhancement violated the Supreme Court’s ruling in United

States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). However, Walker knowingly

and voluntarily waived his appellate rights, the Government seeks
2

to enforce the waiver, Walker’s sentencing claim does not fall

within any of the exceptions to the appeal waiver, and the plain

language of the waiver bars this appeal. See United States v.

Story, 439 F.3d 226, 230-31 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Bond,

414 F.3d 542, 546 (5th Cir. 2005); United States v. McKinney,

406 F.3d 744, 746 (5th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS58820 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Exhibit 32.1



           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Pioneer Railcorp (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  we, Guy  L.Brenkman,
President and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and J. Michael Carr,  Chief  Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Guy L. Brenkman                           /s/ J. Michael Carr
-------------------------------------         ----------------------------------
Guy L. Brenkman                               J. Michael Carr
President and Chief Executive Officer         Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2004



                                       1
118 STAT. 2252 PUBLIC LAW 108–398—OCT. 30, 2004

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4632:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Sept. 13, considered and passed House.

Oct. 10, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–398

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 19504

Linden Boulevard in St. Albans, New York, as the ‘‘Archie Spigner Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

19504 Linden Boulevard in St. Albans, New York, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Archie Spigner Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Archie

Spigner Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 30, 2004.

Oct. 30, 2004

[H.R. 4632]
8.1103 Contract requirements.       Contracting officers shall include the following items in each contract for leasing motor vehicles:                                       (a)                    						            Scope of contract.                                          (b)                    						            Method of computing payments.                                          (c)                    						            A listing of the number and type of vehicles required, and the equipment and accessories to be provided with each vehicle.                                          (d)                    						            Responsibilities of the contractor or the Government for furnishing gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, and similar items.                                          (e)                    						            Unless it is determined that it will be more economical for the Government to perform the work, a statement that the contractor shall perform all maintenance on the vehicles.                                          (f)                    						            A statement as to the applicability of pertinent State and local laws and regulations, and the responsibility of each party for compliance with them.                                          (g)                    						            Responsibilities of the contractor or the Government for emergency repairs and services.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 8.11 - Leasing of Motor Vehicles
MEDIATION REFERRALS

2006-1038.

#### State ex rel. Boccuzzi v. Cuyahoga Cty. Commrs.

Cuyahoga App. No. 86333, 2006-Ohio-1835.

The following case has been referred to mediation pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6):
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Report of Silver Pearl Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for
the period from January 27, 2005 (Inception) through June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ DENISE D. SMITH
              Denise
      D. Smith
              Sole
      Member of the Board of Directors
              Dated:
      September 26, 2008
              
              
              /s/
      DENISE D. SMITH
              Denise
      D. Smith
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              Dated:
      September 26, 2008
              
              
              /s/
      DENISE D. SMITH
              Denise
      D. Smith
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              Dated:
      September 26, 2008
              
              
              /s/
      DENISE D. SMITH
              Denise
      D. Smith
              Principal
      Accounting Officer
              Dated:
      September 26, 2008


This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of


Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

	In connection with the Quarterly Report of Third-Order
Nanotechnologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frederick J. Goetz,
Jr., President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: September 13, 2007

                                /s/ Frederick J. Goetz, Jr.
                               ---------------------------------------
                               Frederick J. Goetz, Jr., President
                               Third-Order Nanotechnologies, Inc.
#### § 407.17 Area risk protection insurance for wheat.

The wheat crop insurance provisions for Area Risk Protection Insurance for the 2014 and succeeding crop years are as follows:

# UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

# Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

## Area Risk Protection Insurance

### Wheat Crop Insurance Provisions

### 1. Definitions

*Harvest.* Combining or threshing the wheat for grain.

*Planted acreage.* In addition to the definition contained in the Area Risk Protection Insurance Basic Provisions, land on which seed is initially spread onto the soil surface by any method and which subsequently is mechanically incorporated into the soil in a timely manner and at the proper depth will also be considered planted.

### 2. Insured Crop

The insured crop will be all wheat:

(a) Grown on insurable acreage in the county listed on the accepted application;

(b) Properly planted by the final planting date and reported on or before the acreage reporting date;

(c) Planted with the intent to be harvested;

(d) Not planted into an established grass or legume;

(e) Not interplanted with another crop; and

(f) Not planted as a nurse crop, unless seeded at the normal rate and intended for harvest as grain.

### 3. Payment Dates

(a) Unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions the final county revenues and final county yields will be determined prior to April 1 following the crop year.

(b) If an indemnity is due, unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions we will issue any payment to you prior to May 1 following the crop year and following the determination of the final county revenue or the final county yield, as applicable.

### 4. Program Dates

| State and county | Cancellation and termination dates | Contract change date |
| --- | --- | --- |
| All Colorado counties except Alamosa, Conejos, Costilla, Rio Grande, and Saguache; all Montana counties except Daniels and Sheridan Counties; all South Dakota counties except Corson, Walworth, Edmonds, Faulk, Spink, Beadle, Kingsbury, Miner, McCook, Turner, and Yankton Counties and all South Dakota counties east thereof; all Wyoming counties except Big Horn, Fremont, Hot Springs, Park, and Washakie Counties; and all other states except Alaska, Arizona, California, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Utah, and Vermont | September 30 | June 30. |
| Arizona; California; Nevada; and Utah | October 31 | June 30 |
| Alaska; Alamosa, Conejos, Costilla, Rio Grande, and Saguache Counties, Colorado; Maine; Minnesota; Daniels and Sheridan Counties, Montana; New Hampshire; North Dakota; Corson, Walworth, Edmunds, Faulk, Spink, Beadle, Kingsbury, Miner, McCook, Turner, and Yankton Counties, South Dakota, and all South Dakota counties east thereof; Vermont; and Big Horn, Fremont, Hot Springs, Park, and Washakie Counties, Wyoming | March 15 | November 30. |
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:96-cr-00005-MP-GRJ

CLARENCE JOHNSON, JR, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation dated February 13, 2013. (Doc. 59). The parties have been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has

passed, and none have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely

filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s petition for time served in state custody (doc. 58) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of March, 2013

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Skip to main content area
- Login
- Register
- Forgot Password

## Search form

- About   - About DSIAC
  - Director's Welcome
  - The DSIAC Team
  - DTIC STI Program
  - DTIC IAC Program
  - DTIC R&E Gateway
  - Core Analysis Task Program
  - Subject Matter Experts
  - Technical Inquiries 
- Communities   - Advanced Materials
  - Autonomous Systems
  - Directed Energy
  - Energetics
  - Military Sensing
  - Non-lethal Weapons
  - RMQSI
  - Survivability & Vulnerability
  - Weapon Systems 
- Resources   - Announcements
  - The DSIAC Journal     - All DSIAC Journals
    - DSIAC Journal Subscription Request
    - DSIAC Journal Article Submission
    - About the Journal 
  - Legacy Journals
  - Discussions
  - Events
  - Models & Tools     - All Models/Tools
    - About Models
    - Model Services
    - Model Submission 
  - News
  - Reference Documents
  - Standards/Policies
  - Training
  - Calendar
  - Search Site 
- Services   - Request Information
  - DSIAC Store
  - Contact DSIAC 

## You are here

Home

## User login

- Register for Account
- Forgot Password?

## Request Information

- Create Request

## Resources

- Announcements
- The DSIAC Journal
- Legacy Journals
- Discussions
- Events
- Models & Tools
- News
- Reference Documents
- Standards/Policies
- Training
- Calendar
- Search Site

# About

- About DSIAC
- Director's Welcome
- The DSIAC Team
- DTIC STI Program
- DTIC IAC Program
- DTIC R&E Gateway
- Core Analysis Task Program
- Subject Matter Experts
- Technical Inquiries

SURVICE Engineering Company, Copyright © 2015, Privacy PolicyPhone: 443-360-4600 | Fax: 410-272-6763 | Contact Us | Sitemap4695 Millennium Drive, Belcamp, MD 21017For best browsing experience on Internet Explorer, please upgrade to IE8 or higher.