alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
iii i i i



### MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00406-CR Shariel SANCHEZ , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006-CR-1519 Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice Catherine Stone, Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 27, 2008 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Appellant was sentenced on February 4, 2008. No timely motion for new trial having been filed, appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed no later than March 5, 2008. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.2. The notice of appeal was not filed until June 9, 2008. On July 22, 2008, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We noted that this court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal of a criminal conviction in the absence of a timely, written notice of appeal. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d04-08-00406-CR

-2- 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Appellant did not respond to our order; however, appellant’s attorney previously had filed written notice that the attorney could find no right of appeal for appellant pursuant to Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Because we lack jurisdiction to consider appellant’s untimely appeal, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH
#### State Tax Commission, Plaintiff, v Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, and Feature Sports, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. Roy Cohn, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County, both entered on March 31, 1980, unanimously affirmed, without prejudice to an application at Special Term to modify or clarify the original order of Fraiman, J., for installment payment as that order may be affected by appointment of the receiver. Respondent shall recover of appellant $75 costs and disbursements of these appeals. Concur—Sandler, J. P., Markewich, Silverman and Bloom, JJ. .
§ 360.300 Notice of restrictions on movement of noxious weeds. No person may move a Federal noxious weed into or through the United States, or interstate, unless: ( a ) He or she applies for a permit to move a noxious weed in accordance with § 360.301;
( b ) The permit application is approved; and
( c ) The movement is consistent with the specific conditions contained in the permit.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0054) [75 FR 68954, Nov. 10, 2010]
§ 371.13 Reservation of authority. The following are reserved to the Administrator, or to the individual designated to act for the Administrator: ( a ) The initiation, change, or discontinuance of major program activities.
( b ) The issuance of regulations pursuant to law.
( c ) The transfer of functions between Deputy Administrators and Directors.
( d ) The transfer of funds between Deputy Administrators and Directors.
( e ) The transfer of funds between work projects within each Deputy Administrator's or Director's area, except those not exceeding 10 percent of base funds or $50,000 in either work project, whichever is less.
( f ) The approval of any change in the formal organization, including a section, its equivalent, or higher level.
( g ) The making of recommendations to the Department concerning establishment, consolidation, change in location, or abolishment of any regional, State, area, and other field headquarters, and any region or other program area that involves two or more States, or that crosses State lines.
( h ) Authority to establish, consolidate, change a location, abolish any field office, or change program area boundaries not included in paragraph (g) of this section.
( i ) Approval of all appointments, promotions, and reassignments at the GS-14 level and above.
( j ) Authorization for foreign travel and for attendance at foreign and international meetings, including those held in the United States.
( k ) Approval of all appointments, promotions, and reassignments of employees to foreign countries.
( l ) Approval of program budgets.
( m ) Authority to determine the circumstances under which commuted traveltime allowances may be paid to employees performing inspections and necessary auxiliary services after normal working hours or on holidays, when these services come within the scope of the Act of August 28, 1950 (7 U.S.C. 2260).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2476 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2476

    To suspend temporarily the duty on N-Cyclohexylthiophthalimide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2006

  Mr. DeWine (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on N-Cyclohexylthiophthalimide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. N-CYCLOHEXYLTHIOPHTHALIMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.01      N-                  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Cyclohexylthiopht                                                  31/2009
                         halimide (CAS No.
                         17796-82-6)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2930.90.24)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 4280.37 Application forms and filing dates. ( a ) The Intermediary may obtain forms that supplement the written narrative sections of its application from the Rural Development State Office for the State where the Intermediary is located.
( b ) An original copy only of the application is to be filed with the Rural Development State Office. No other copies are required.
II 

Calendar No. 363 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2320 

To make available funds included in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 

for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program for fiscal year 

2006, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2006 

Ms. SNOWE (for herself, Mr. COLEMAN, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read the first time 

FEBRUARY 17, 2006 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To make available funds included in the Deficit Reduction 

Act of 2005 for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program for fiscal year 2006, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 2320 PCS

1 SECTION 1. FUNDS FOR LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY AS2 SISTANCE PROGRAM. 

3 Section 9001 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘for a 1-time only obliga7 tion and expenditure’’; 

8 (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘fiscal 

9 year 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2006’’; 

10 and 

11 (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fiscal 

12 year 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2006’’; 

13 (2) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub14 section (c); 

15 (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol16 lowing: 

17 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—None of the funds made available 

18 under this section may be used for the planning and ad19 ministering described in section 2605(b)(9) of the Low20 Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C. 

21 8624(b)(9)).’’; and 

22 (4) in subsection (c) (as redesignated by para23 graph (2)), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2007’’ and 

24 inserting ‘‘September 30, 2006’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS

cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
Calendar No. 363 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2320 

A BILL 

To make available funds included in the Deficit Reand for other purposes. Energy Assistance Program for fiscal year 2006, duction Act of 2005 for the Low-Income Home 

FEBRUARY 17, 2006 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
EXHIBIT
      32





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





I,
      Adam
      R. Cegielski, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      of
      Konigsberg Corporation on Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal quarter ended September
      30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
      10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of Konigsberg Corporation.





Date:
      April 20, 2007





By:
/s/
      Adam R.
      Cegielski


Adam
      R.
      Cegielski,


Chief
      Executive
      Officer and


Principal
      Financial
      Officer
17.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes policies and procedures for the acquisition of supplies and services through

special contracting methods, including-

(a) Multi-year contracting;

(b) Options; and

(c) Leader company contracting.

Parent topic: Part 17 - Special Contracting Methods
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-22-00307-CV

IN RE GEORGE BERGIN

Original Proceeding

From the 414th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022-2156-5

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator George Bergin’s petition for writ of mandamus filed on September 21, 

2022, is denied.

STEVE SMITH

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson,

and Justice Smith,

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed November 9, 2022

[OT06]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

KEVIN JEROME PARKER, JR., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2893 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 27, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Joseph C. Fuller, Jr., Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Siobhan Helene Shea, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
#### BAHR Respondent, v. CLARKE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 16, 1906.)

Action by Mary Bahr against John J. Clarke.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Paine v. Upton, 87 N. Y. 327, 41 Am. Rep. 371.

WILLIAMS, J., dissents, on authority of Curtis v. Albee, 167 N. Y. 360, 60 N. E. 660.
4.102 Contractor’s signature.

(a) Individuals. A contract with an individual shall be signed by that individual. A contract with an

individual doing business as a firm shall be signed by that individual, and the signature shall be

followed by the individual’s typed, stamped, or printed name and the words ", an individual doing

business as _________" [insert name of firm].

(b) Partnerships. A contract with a partnership shall be signed in the partnership name. Before

signing for the Government, the contracting officer shall obtain a list of all partners and ensure that

the individual(s) signing for the partnership have authority to bind the partnership.

(c) Corporations. A contract with a corporation shall be signed in the corporate name, followed by

the word "by" and the signature and title of the person authorized to sign. The contracting officer

shall ensure that the person signing for the corporation has authority to bind the corporation.

(d) Joint venturers. A contract with joint venturers may involve any combination of individuals,

partnerships, or corporations. The contract shall be signed by each participant in the joint venture in

the manner prescribed in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section for each type of participant.

When a corporation is participating, the contracting officer shall verify that the corporation is

authorized to participate in the joint venture.

(e) Agents. When an agent is to sign the contract, other than as stated in paragraphs (a) through (d)

of this section, the agent’s authorization to bind the principal must be established by evidence

satisfactory to the contracting officer.

Parent topic: Subpart 4.1 - Contract Execution
97-1251.

#### State ex rel. Presley v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 96APD08-1090. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellants’ application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
#### Dean M. Szajna, Appellant, v Ellis D. Rand et al., Respondents.

In a medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered October 19, 1979, which granted defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 5) to dismiss the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations. Order and judgment reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements and motion to dismiss complaint denied. Defendants’ time to serve an *618answer is extended until 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, together with notice of entry thereof. Contrary to Special Term’s conclusion, CPLR 214-a does not apply to those causes of action arising prior to its effective date, July 1, 1975 (L 1975, ch 109, § 37). Consequently, the facts of this case are controlled not by CPLR 214-a, but by prior decisional law. In our opinion, Murphy v *St. Charles Hosp.*(35 AD2d 64) is dispositive of the case at bar. There, reviewing the rationale underlying the creation of the "foreign object exception” in *Flanagan*v *Mount Eden Gen. Hosp.*(24 NY2d 427), this court concluded that an identity of relevant criteria warranted the extension of this exception to cases involving surgically implanted prosthetic devices. Although the Legislature has since indicated its intent to restrict the *Flanagan*exception and exclude from it prosthetic or fixation devices, as already noted, this restriction is to he applied prospectively from July 1, 1975 and is inapplicable to the case at bar. Therefore, under *Murphy,*which remains a viable interpretation of *Flanagan*for those acts preceding July 1, 1975, insertion of an intra-medullary nail would be within the foreign object exception. The cause of action thus accrued upon discovery of the broken nail and service of process within three years of that discovery was timely. Nor was plaintiffs failure to submit, in opposition to defendants’ motion, an affidavit of an individual, with personal knowledge of the facts fatal since the facts upon which the Statute of Limitations issue depended were not in dispute. Finally, we note that, as with any other corporation, professional corporations are liable for the actions of their members or officers when acting in these capacities (see Business Corporation Law, § 1505, subd [a]; § 1513; 12 NY Jur, Corporations, § 855, p 389). Damiani, J. P., Margett, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



November 5, 2007

Securities and Exchange
Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group
LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/    Bruce Wasserstein                              
|Bruce Wasserstein Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Salary & Bonus Agreement


 Exhibit 10.7 
  
 Named Executive Officer Salary and Bonus Arrangements for 2005 
  
 Base Salaries 
  
 The base salaries for 2005 for the executive officers (the “named executive officers”) of First PacTrust Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
and Pacific Trust Bank who will be named in the compensation table that will appear in the Company’s upcoming 2005 annual meeting proxy statement are as follows: 
  

				
	 Name and Title

	  	Base Salary


	 Hans R. Ganz
 President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	225,493
	 James P. Sheehy
 Secretary and Treasurer
	  	$	121,763
	 Melanie M. Stewart
 Executive Vice President – Lending
	  	$	130,499
	 Regan J. Gallagher
 Senior Vice President – Controller
	  	$	89,918
	 Rachel M. Carrillo
 Senior Vice President – Branch Operations
	  	$	85,821

  
 Description of 2005 Bonus Incentive
Plan 
  
 On March 15, 2005, the Company’s Board of
Directors approved a cash incentive bonus plan for 2005 (the “2005 Bonus Plan”) for all officers and employees of the Company and the Bank. Bonuses will be paid under the 2005 Bonus Plan in early 2006 if and to the extent the
Company’s performance in 2005 meets or exceeds certain minimum levels on certain key performance indicators. 
  
 The key performance indicators used to determine whether any bonuses will be paid under the 2005 Bonus Plan will be the same for all employees. The
amounts of the bonuses under the 2005 Bonus Plan, if earned, will be determined, in part, by multiplying the employee’s salary by an the employee’s payout percentage up to a maximum of 45% of salary, plus a discretionary component which
may or may not be paid in whole or in part based on the Compensation Committee’s qualitative assessment of individual contributions toward the Company’s success relative to Customer Service, Deposit Growth, Compliance, Loan Originations
and Portfolio Growth, Loan Charge-Off and Delinquency Ratios. While the payout percentages will vary from employee to employee, they will increase proportionately for all employees if and to the extent the Company attains a net income level above
the minimum threshold. All named executive officers are eligible under the plan. 
  
 Discretionary Bonus 2005: The total discretionary amount available for distribution to all employees will not to exceed 4% of after-tax net income. 






 Director Fee Arrangements for 2005 
  
 Each director of First PacTrust Bancorp, Inc., (the “Company”) also is a director of Pacific Trust Bank (the
“Bank”). As of the March 11, 2005 shareholder record date for the 2005 annual meeting, as for 2004, each non-employee director receives a fee of $600 for each Bank board meeting attended. In addition, the Chairman of the Board receives an
additional $300 per Bank board meeting attended and each director receives $200 per Bank committee meeting attended. Attendance by telephone is compensated at one-third the rate for directors attending in person. Directors are not paid a fee for
service on the Company’s board. There are no deferred compensation arrangements with any non-employee director.
§ 3565.212 Multiple guaranteed loans. The Agency may guarantee more than one loan on any project if all guaranteed loans, in the aggregate, comply with these regulations, including without limitation: ( a ) In the aggregate, loans do not exceed the maximum guaranteed loan amount and loan-to-value limits, as contained in § 3565.204;
( b ) In the aggregate, loans are all to be secured equally by a first lien as the Agency may, at its sole discretion, determine necessary to ensure repayment of the loans; and
( c ) If different lenders originate the loans, each lender has executed an intercreditor agreement in form and substance acceptable to the Agency.
[63 FR 39458, July 22, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 2931, Jan. 19, 2005]
§ 360.400 Treatments. ( a ) Seeds of *Guizotia abyssinica* (niger seed) are commonly contaminated with noxious weed seeds listed in § 360.200, including (but not limited to) *Cuscuta* spp. Therefore, *Guizotia abyssinica* seeds may be imported into the United States only if: ( 1 ) They are treated in accordance with part 305 of this chapter at the time of arrival at the port of first arrival in the United States; or
( 2 ) They are treated prior to shipment to the United States at a facility that is approved by APHIS[4] and that operates in compliance with a written agreement between the treatment facility owner and the plant protection service of the exporting country, in which the treatment facility owner agrees to comply with the provisions of § 319.37-9(c) of this chapter and allow inspectors and representatives of the plant protection service of the exporting country access to the treatment facility as necessary to monitor compliance with the regulations. Treatments must be certified in accordance with the conditions described in § 319.37-9(c) of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
[75 FR 68955, Nov. 10, 2010, as amended at 83 FR 11867, Mar. 19, 2018] Footnotes -
360.400
[4] Criteria for the approval of heat treatment facilities are contained in part 305 of this chapter.
§ 3560.552 Program objectives. ( a ) In addition to the objectives stated in § 3560.52, off-farm labor housing loan and grant funds will be used to increase: ( 1 ) The supply of affordable housing for farm labor; and
( 2 ) The ability of communities to attract farm labor by providing housing which is affordable, decent, safe and sanitary.
( b ) Under section 516(i) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1486(i)), the Agency may award technical assistance grants to encourage the development of farm labor housing.
§ 4279.173 Loan approval and obligating funds. ( a ) Upon approval of a loan guarantee, the Agency will issue a Conditional Commitment to the lender, containing conditions under which a Loan Note Guarantee will be issued. No Conditional Commitment can be issued until the loan is obligated. If a Loan Note Guarantee is not issued by the Conditional Commitment expiration date, the Conditional Commitment may be extended at the request of the lender and only if there has been no material adverse change in the borrower or the borrower's financial condition since issuance of the Conditional Commitment. If the Conditional Commitment is not accepted, the Conditional Commitment may be withdrawn and funds may be deobligated. Likewise, if the Conditional Commitment expires, funds may be deobligated.
( b ) If certain conditions of the Conditional Commitment cannot be met, the lender and borrower may request changes to the Conditional Commitment. Within the requirements of the applicable regulations and prudent lending practices, the Agency may negotiate with the lender and the borrower regarding any proposed changes to the Conditional Commitment. Any changes to the Conditional Commitment must be documented by written amendment to the Conditional Commitment.
( c ) The borrower must comply with all Federal requirements then in effect for receiving Federal assistance.